|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UNITED STATES
|
|||||||||||||||||
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION |
|||||||||||||||||
Washington, D.C. 20549 |
|||||||||||||||||
FORM 10-Q |
|||||||||||||||||
(Mark One) |
|||||||||||||||||
[x] |
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
||||||||||||||||
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2018 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[ ] |
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
||||||||||||||||
For the transition period from to |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commission file number 001-14157 |
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter) |
|||||||||||||||||
Delaware |
|
|
36-2669023 |
||||||||||||||
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
|
|
(IRS Employer Identification No.) |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 North LaSalle Street, Suite 4000, Chicago, Illinois 60602 |
|||||||||||||||||
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code) |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (312) 630-1900 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
Yes |
No |
|||||||||||||||
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. |
[x] |
[ ] |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). |
[x] |
[ ] |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. |
|||||||||||||||||
Large accelerated filer |
[x] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accelerated filer |
[ ] |
|||||||
Non-accelerated filer |
[ ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Smaller reporting company |
[ ] |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Emerging growth company |
[ ] |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. |
[ ] |
||||||||||||||||
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). |
[ ] |
[x] |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date. |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class |
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2018 |
||||||||||||||
Common Shares, $0.01 par value |
|
|
104,636,089 Shares |
||||||||||||||
Series A Common Shares, $0.01 par value |
|
|
7,273,678 Shares |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q |
|
For the Period Ended June 30, 2018 |
|
|
|
Index |
Page No. |
|
|
Management Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
|
Supplemental Information Relating to Non-GAAP Financial Measures |
|
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 Safe Harbor Cautionary Statement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
The following discussion and analysis compares Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.’s (TDS) financial results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, to the three and six months ended June 30, 2017. It should be read in conjunction with TDS’ interim consolidated financial statements and notes included herein, and with the description of TDS’ business, its audited consolidated financial statements and Management's Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in TDS’ Annual Report on Form 10-K (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2017. Certain numbers included herein are rounded to millions for ease of presentation; however, calculated amounts and percentages are determined using the unrounded numbers.
This report contains statements that are not based on historical facts, including the words “believes,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “expects,” “plans,” “intends,” “projects,” and similar expressions. These statements constitute and represent “forward looking statements” as this term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results, events or developments to be significantly different from any future results, events or developments expressed or implied by such forward looking statements. See Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 Safe Harbor Cautionary Statement for additional information.
TDS uses certain “non-GAAP financial measures” and each such measure is identified in the MD&A. A discussion of the reason TDS determines these metrics to be useful and a reconciliation of these measures to their most directly comparable measures determined in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) are included in the Supplemental Information Relating to Non-GAAP Financial Measures section within the MD&A of this Form 10-Q Report.
General TDS is a diversified telecommunications company that provides high-quality communications services to approximately 6 million connections nationwide. TDS provides wireless services through its 83%-owned subsidiary, United States Cellular Corporation (U.S. Cellular). TDS also provides wireline and cable services through its wholly-owned subsidiary, TDS Telecommunications LLC (TDS Telecom). See Note 12 — Business Segment Information in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for summary financial information on each business segment. TDS re-evaluated internal reporting roles with regard to its hosted and managed services (HMS) business unit and, as a result, changed its reportable segments. Effective January 1, 2018, HMS was considered a non-reportable segment and is no longer being reported under TDS Telecom. Prior periods have been recast to conform to this revised presentation. |
|
TDS’ mission is to provide outstanding communications services to its customers and meet the needs of its shareholders, its people, and its communities. In pursuing this mission, TDS seeks to grow its businesses, create opportunities for its associates and employees, and build value over the long-term for its shareholders. Across all of its businesses, TDS is focused on providing exceptional customer experiences through best-in-class services and products and superior customer service.
TDS’ long-term strategy calls for the majority of its capital to be reinvested in its operating businesses to strengthen their competitive positions and financial performance, while also returning value to TDS shareholders through the payment of a regular quarterly cash dividend and share repurchases.
In 2018, TDS is working to build shareholder value by continuing to execute on its strategies to build strong, competitive businesses providing high-quality, data-focused services and products. Strategic efforts include:
The following is a list of definitions of certain industry terms that are used throughout this document:
Results of Operations — TDS Consolidated
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
||||||||||||
|
|
2018¹ |
|
2017 |
|
2018 vs. 2017 |
|
2018¹ |
|
2017 |
|
2018 vs. 2017 |
|||||||
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Operating revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
U.S. Cellular |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
1% |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
1% |
||||||
|
TDS Telecom |
|
|
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
|
|
– |
||||||
|
All other2 |
|
|
|
|
|
(4)% |
|
|
|
|
|
(18)% |
||||||
|
|
Total operating revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
1% |
|
|
|
|
|
– |
|||||
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
U.S. Cellular |
|
|
|
|
|
(4)% |
|
|
|
|
|
(2)% |
||||||
|
TDS Telecom |
|
|
|
|
|
6% |
|
|
|
|
|
5% |
||||||
|
All other2 |
|
|
|
|
|
4% |
|
|
|
|
|
(8)% |
||||||
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
(2)% |
|
|
|
|
|
(2)% |
|||||
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
U.S. Cellular |
|
|
|
|
|
>100% |
|
|
|
|
|
>100% |
||||||
|
TDS Telecom |
|
|
|
|
|
(41)% |
|
|
|
|
|
(29)% |
||||||
|
All other2 |
|
|
|
|
|
(53)% |
|
|
|
|
|
>(100)% |
||||||
|
|
Total operating income |
|
|
|
|
|
>100% |
|
|
|
|
|
29% |
|||||
Investment and other income (expense) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities |
|
|
|
|
|
23% |
|
|
|
|
|
20% |
||||||
|
Interest and dividend income |
|
|
|
|
|
65% |
|
|
|
|
|
48% |
||||||
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
(1)% |
|
|
|
|
|
(1)% |
||||||
|
Other, net |
|
|
|
|
|
(33)% |
|
|
|
|
|
(39)% |
||||||
|
|
Total investment and other income (expense) |
|
|
|
|
|
>100% |
|
|
|
|
|
>100% |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Income before income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
>100% |
|
|
|
|
|
47% |
|||||||
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
|
|
|
>100% |
|
|
|
|
|
1% |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
>100% |
|
|
|
|
|
84% |
|||||||
|
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
>100% |
|
|
|
|
|
>100% |
||||||
Net income attributable to TDS shareholders |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
>100% |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
52% |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Adjusted OIBDA (Non-GAAP)3 |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
12% |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
9% |
|||||||
Adjusted EBITDA (Non-GAAP)3 |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
14% |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
10% |
|||||||
Capital expenditures |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
3% |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
10% |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
1 |
As of January 1, 2018, TDS adopted ASU 2014-09 using a modified retrospective approach. Under this method, the new accounting standard is applied only to the most recent period presented. See Note 2 — Revenue Recognition in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information. |
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
Consists of corporate and other operations and intercompany eliminations. |
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
Refer to Supplemental Information Relating to Non-GAAP Financial Measures within this MD&A for a reconciliation of this measure. |
Refer to individual segment discussions in this MD&A for additional details on operating revenues and expenses at the segment level.
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities represents TDS’ share of net income from entities in which it has a noncontrolling interest and that are accounted for by the equity method. TDS’ investment in the Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership (LA Partnership) contributed $20 million and $17 million for the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and $38 and $33 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively, to Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities. See Note 8 — Investments in Unconsolidated Entities in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
TDS’ effective tax rate on Income before income taxes for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, was 31.5% and 30.5%, respectively. The effective tax rate for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, was 45.0% and 44.4%, respectively. The lower rate in 2018 as compared to 2017 is due primarily to the reduction of the U.S. federal corporate tax rate from 35% to 21% as a result of the Tax Act enacted in December 2017. Due to difficulty in reliably projecting an annual tax rate, TDS calculated income taxes for the six months ended June 30, 2017, based on an estimated year-to-date tax rate.
The bonus depreciation provision of the Tax Act is expected to substantially reduce TDS’ current federal income tax liability in 2018. See Note 5 — Income Taxes in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information related to income taxes.
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests, net of tax
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|||||||||
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
||||||||
|
2018 |
|
2017 |
|
2018 |
|
2017 |
||||
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Cellular noncontrolling public shareholders’ |
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
||||
Noncontrolling shareholders’ or partners’ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests, net of tax |
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests, net of tax includes the noncontrolling public shareholders’ share of U.S. Cellular’s net income and the noncontrolling shareholders’ or partners’ share of certain U.S. Cellular subsidiaries’ net income.
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests, net of tax increased during the six months ended June 30, 2018, due primarily to an out-of-period adjustment recorded in the first quarter of 2018. TDS determined that this adjustment was not material to any of the periods impacted. See Note 10 — Variable Interest Entities in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
Three and Six Months Ended
Net income and Adjusted EBITDA increased due primarily to improved Operating income levels at U.S. Cellular as a result of cost savings initiatives and a decrease in Cost of equipment sold. |
|
*Represents a non-GAAP financial measure. Refer to Supplemental Information Relating to Non-GAAP Financial Measures within this MD&A for a reconciliation of this measure. |
|
Business Overview
U.S. Cellular owns, operates, and invests in wireless markets throughout the United States. U.S. Cellular is an 83%-owned subsidiary of TDS. U.S. Cellular’s strategy is to attract and retain wireless customers through a value proposition comprised of a high-quality network, outstanding customer service, and competitive devices, plans, and pricing, all provided with a local focus.
OPERATIONS |
|
|
|
As of June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
2018 |
|
2017 |
||||
|
Retail Connections – End of Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Postpaid |
|
|
|
|
4,468,000 |
|
4,478,000 |
||||
|
|
Prepaid |
|
|
|
|
527,000 |
|
484,000 |
||||
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
4,995,000 |
|
4,962,000 |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
Q2 2018 |
|
Q2 2017 |
|
YTD 2018 |
|
YTD 2017 |
|||||
|
Postpaid Activity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
Gross Additions |
146,000 |
|
174,000 |
|
275,000 |
|
320,000 |
||||
|
|
Net Additions (Losses) |
(13,000) |
|
23,000 |
|
(50,000) |
|
(4,000) |
||||
|
|
Churn |
1.19% |
|
1.13% |
|
1.21% |
|
1.21% |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
The decrease in postpaid net additions for the three months ended June 30, 2018, when compared to the same period last year, was driven mainly by both lower handset and tablet gross additions as well as an increase in tablet churn. The decline in tablet gross additions reflects U.S. Cellular‘s decision to curtail promotions of heavily discounted tablets.
The increase in postpaid net losses for the six months ended June 30, 2018, when compared to the same period last year, was driven mainly by lower tablet gross additions and higher tablet churn.
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
||||||||
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|||||||
|
|
2018 |
|
2017 |
|
2018 |
|
2017 |
||||
Average Revenue Per User (ARPU) |
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|||||
Average Billings Per User (ABPU)1 |
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Average Revenue Per Account (ARPA) |
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|||||
Average Billings Per Account (ABPA)1 |
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
1 |
Postpaid ABPU and Postpaid ABPA are non-GAAP financial measures. Refer to Supplemental Information Relating to Non-GAAP Financial Measures within this MD&A for a reconciliation of these measures. |
On January 1, 2018, U.S. Cellular adopted the provisions of ASU 2014-09, using a modified retrospective method. Under this method, the new accounting standard is applied only to the most recent period presented, recognizing the cumulative effect of the accounting change as an adjustment to retained earnings at January 1, 2018. See Note 2 — Revenue Recognition in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details.
Postpaid ARPU increased for the three months ended June 30, 2018, when compared to the same period last year, driven by increases in device protection plan and regulatory recovery revenues. Such factors were partially offset by the impact of adopting the provisions of ASU 2014-09. Postpaid ARPA decreased for the three months ended June 30, 2018, when compared to the same period last year, due primarily to a decrease in postpaid connections per account driven by higher tablet churn. Application of the new accounting standard had the impact of reducing ARPU and ARPA for the three months ended June 30, 2018, by $0.41 and $1.07, respectively.
Postpaid ARPU and Postpaid ARPA decreased for the six months ended June 30, 2018, when compared to the same periods last year, due primarily to the impact of adopting the provisions of ASU 2014-09, as well as the impact of overall price reductions on plan offerings. Such factors were partially offset by the increases in device protection plan and regulatory recovery revenues. Application of the new accounting standard had the impact of reducing ARPU and ARPA for the six months ended June 30, 2018, by $0.47 and $1.24, respectively.
Under equipment installment plans, customers pay for their wireless devices in installments over a period of time. In order to show the trend in estimated cash collections from postpaid customer billings for both service and equipment, U.S. Cellular has presented Postpaid ABPU and Postpaid ABPA, which are calculated as Postpaid ARPU and Postpaid ARPA plus average monthly equipment installment plan billings per connection and account, respectively.
Postpaid ABPU and ABPA increased for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, due primarily to an increase in equipment installment plan billings driven primarily by increased penetration of equipment installment plans.
Financial Overview — U.S. Cellular
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018 vs. |
|
|
|
|
2018 vs. |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
2018¹ |
|
2017 |
|
2017 |
|
2018¹ |
|
2017 |
|
2017 |
||||
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Retail service |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
1% |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
– |
|||||||
Inbound roaming |
|
|
|
|
|
26% |
|
|
|
|
|
15% |
|||||||
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
(20)% |
|
|
|
|
|
(22)% |
|||||||
|
Service revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
|
|
(1)% |
||||||
Equipment sales |
|
|
|
|
|
5% |
|
|
|
|
|
9% |
|||||||
|
Total operating revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
1% |
|
|
|
|
|
1% |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
System operations (excluding Depreciation, amortization and accretion reported below) |
|
|
|
|
|
(1)% |
|
|
|
|
|
– |
|||||||
Cost of equipment sold |
|
|
|
|
|
(8)% |
|
|
|
|
|
(6)% |
|||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
|
|
|
(2)% |
|
|
|
|
|
(3)% |
|||||||
Depreciation, amortization and accretion |
|
|
|
|
|
3% |
|
|
|
|
|
3% |
|||||||
(Gain) loss on asset disposals, net |
|
|
|
|
|
(84)% |
|
|
|
|
|
(75)% |
|||||||
(Gain) loss on license sales and exchanges, net |
|
|
|
|
|
>(100)% |
|
|
|
|
|
8% |
|||||||
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
(4)% |
|
|
|
|
|
(2)% |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Operating income |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
>100% |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
>100% |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net income |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
>100% |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
>100% |
|||||||
Adjusted OIBDA (Non-GAAP)2 |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
26% |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
19% |
|||||||
Adjusted EBITDA (Non-GAAP)2 |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
25% |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
19% |
|||||||
Capital expenditures |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
2% |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
7% |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
As of January 1, 2018, U.S. Cellular adopted ASU 2014-09 using a modified retrospective approach. Under this method, the new accounting standard is applied only to the most recent period presented. See Note 2 — Revenue Recognition in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information. |
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
Refer to Supplemental Information Relating to Non-GAAP Financial Measures within this MD&A for a reconciliation of this measure. |
Service revenues consist of:
Equipment revenues consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
Key components of changes in the statement of operations line items were as follows:
Total operating revenues
Retail service revenues increased for the three months ended June 30, 2018, and decreased for the six months ended June 30, 2018, as a result of the changes in Postpaid ARPU as previously discussed in the Operational Overview section.
Inbound roaming revenues increased for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, primarily driven by higher data roaming usage.
Other service revenues decreased for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, reflecting the exclusion of imputed interest income in 2018 due to the impact of adopting the provisions of ASU 2014-09. Federal USF revenues remained flat at $23 million and $46 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018. See the Regulatory Matters section in this MD&A for a description of the FCC Mobility Fund II Order (MF2 Order) and its expected impacts on U.S. Cellular’s current Federal USF support.
Equipment sales revenues increased for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, due to the impact of adopting the provisions of ASU 2014-09, an increase in the average revenue per device sold, a mix shift from feature phones and connected devices to higher end smartphone devices, and an increase in accessories revenue. Such factors were partially offset by a decrease in the number of devices sold and a reduction in guarantee liability amortization for equipment installment contracts as a result of changes in plan offerings.
See Note 2 — Revenue Recognition in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details on the financial statement impact of ASU 2014-09.
Cost of equipment sold
Cost of equipment sold decreased for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, due primarily to a decrease in the number of devices sold, as well as the impact of adopting the provisions of ASU 2014-09. Such factors were partially offset by increases due to a higher average cost per device sold, an increase in accessories cost, and a mix shift from feature phones and connected devices to higher cost smartphones.
Selling, general and administrative expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased by $9 million and $23 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively, due to lower commissions, advertising and bad debts expenses.
Depreciation, amortization and accretion
Depreciation, amortization, and accretion increased for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, due primarily to an increase in amortization expense related to billing system upgrades.
(Gain) loss on asset disposals, net
Loss on asset disposals, net decreased primarily as a result of fewer disposals of certain network assets.
(Gain) loss on license sales and exchanges, net
Net gains in 2018 and 2017 were due to gains recognized on license sale and exchange transactions with various third parties.
Business Overview
TDS Telecom operates in two reportable segments: Wireline and Cable. TDS Telecom’s business objective is to provide a wide range of communication services to both residential and commercial customers, focused on high-quality broadband and video products.
OPERATIONS |
|
Financial Overview — TDS Telecom
Components of Operating Income
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018 vs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018 vs. |
|
|
2018¹ |
|
2017 |
|
2017 |
|
2018¹ |
|
2017 |
|
2017 |
|||||||
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Operating revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Wireline |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
(4)% |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
(3)% |
||||||
|
Cable |
|
|
|
|
|
12% |
|
|
|
|
|
12% |
||||||
|
|
TDS Telecom operating revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
|
|
– |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Wireline |
|
|
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
|
|
(1)% |
||||||
|
Cable |
|
|
|
|
|
24% |
|
|
|
|
|
22% |
||||||
|
|
TDS Telecom operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
6% |
|
|
|
|
|
5% |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
TDS Telecom operating income |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
(41)% |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
(29)% |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
(22)% |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
(7)% |
|||||||
Adjusted OIBDA (Non-GAAP)2 |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
(9)% |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
(5)% |
|||||||
Adjusted EBITDA (Non-GAAP)2 |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
(8)% |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
(4)% |
|||||||
Capital expenditures |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
4% |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
22% |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Numbers may not foot due to rounding. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
As of January 1, 2018, TDS adopted ASU 2014-09 using a modified retrospective approach. Under this method, the new accounting standard is applied only to the most recent period presented. See Note 2 — Revenue Recognition in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information. |
||||||||||||||||||
2 |
Refer to Supplemental Information Relating to Non-GAAP Financial Measures within this MD&A for a reconciliation of this measure. |
Three and Six Months Ended Operating revenues were flat for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018. Lower Wireline wholesale special access revenue and legacy voice and commercial products decreased revenues offset by Cable broadband and Cable and Wireline video connection growth and price increases. |
Total operating expenses
Operating expenses increased for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, due primarily to higher Wireline and Cable video programming costs, Wireline network maintenance and Cable IT-related expenses. In addition, operating expenses increased due to the impacts of adopting the provisions of ASU 2014-09. See Note 2 — Revenue Recognition in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
Capital expenditures
Capital spending increased for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, to support strategic build-outs including market expansions, A-CAM and Cloud TV.
Business Overview
TDS Telecom’s Wireline business provides broadband, video and voice services. These services are provided to residential, commercial, and wholesale customers in a mix of rural, small town and suburban markets, with the largest concentration of its customers in the Upper Midwest and the Southeast. TDS Telecom’s strategy is to offer its residential customers broadband, video, and voice services through value-added bundling. In its commercial business, TDS Telecom’s focus is on small- to medium-sized businesses and its sales efforts emphasize advanced IP-based data and voice services.
Operational Overview
Residential broadband customers are increasingly choosing higher speeds in ILEC markets with 60% choosing speeds of 10 Mbps or greater and 28% choosing speeds of 50 Mbps or greater. |
Increases in broadband speeds and video connection growth drove increases in average residential revenue per connection. |
|
|
||
Total residential connections decreased by 2% as declines in voice connections outpaced the growth in video and broadband connections. |
|
Total commercial connections decreased by 7% due primarily to a 9% decrease in voice connections, mostly in CLEC markets.
|
Components of operating Income
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
||||||||||||
|
|
2018¹ |
|
2017 |
|
2018 vs. 2017 |
|
2018¹ |
|
2017 |
|
2018 vs. 2017 |
||||||||
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Residential |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
(1)% |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
– |
||||||||
Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
(8)% |
|
|
|
|
|
(7)% |
||||||||
Wholesale |
|
|
|
|
|
(5)% |
|
|
|
|
|
(5)% |
||||||||
|
Service revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
(4)% |
|
|
|
|
|
(3)% |
|||||||
Equipment and product sales |
|
|
|
|
|
53% |
|
|
|
|
|
39% |
||||||||
|
Total operating revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
(4)% |
|
|
|
|
|
(3)% |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Cost of services (excluding Depreciation, amortization and accretion reported below) |
|
|
|
|
|
2% |
|
|
|
|
|
2% |
||||||||
Cost of equipment and products |
|
|
|
|
|
(41)% |
|
|
|
|
|
(32)% |
||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
|
|
|
1% |
|
|
|
|
|
(1)% |
||||||||
Depreciation, amortization and accretion |
|
|
|
|
|
(4)% |
|
|
|
|
|
(5)% |
||||||||
(Gain) loss on asset disposals, net |
|
|
|
|
|
94% |
|
|
|
|
|
17% |
||||||||
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
|
|
(1)% |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Operating income |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
(25)% |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
(16)% |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Income before income taxes |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
(21)% |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
(13)% |
||||||||
Adjusted OIBDA (Non-GAAP)2 |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
(13)% |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
(9)% |
||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA (Non-GAAP)2 |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
(12)% |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
(9)% |
||||||||
Capital expenditures |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
2% |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
24% |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numbers may not foot due to rounding. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|