UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

FORM 10-QSB

ý                                 QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 28, 2005

o                                 TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File Number 000-29643

GRANITE CITY FOOD & BREWERY LTD.

(Exact Name of Small Business Issuer as Specified in Its Charter)

5831 Cedar Lake Road

St. Louis Park, MN 55416

(952) 525-2070

(Address of Principal Executive Offices and Issuer’s

Telephone Number, including Area Code)

Check whether the issuer:  (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes ý    No o.

As of August 8, 2005, the issuer had outstanding 11,623,285 shares of common stock and 1,000,000 Class A Warrants.  The number of outstanding shares of common stock includes the shares issuable upon separation of the units, each consisting of one share of common stock and one redeemable Class A Warrant, sold in the issuer’s initial public offering.

Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format:

Yes o    No ý.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

i

PART I          FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1  Financial Statements

GRANITE CITY FOOD & BREWERY LTD.

CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS

See notes to condensed financial statements.

1

GRANITE CITY FOOD & BREWERY LTD.

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

See notes to condensed financial statements.

2

GRANITE CITY FOOD & BREWERY LTD.

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

See notes to condensed financial statements.

3

GRANITE CITY FOOD & BREWERY LTD.

NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 27, 2004 and June 28, 2005

1.              Nature of business and basis of presentation:

Nature of business:

Granite City Food & Brewery Ltd. (the “Company”) develops and operates casual dining restaurants featuring on-premise breweries known as Granite City Food & Brewery®, in selected markets throughout the United States.  The theme is casual dining with a wide variety of menu items that are prepared fresh daily, combined with freshly brewed hand-crafted beers made on-premise.  The Company produces its beer using a process called Fermentus Interruptus™, which is intended to maintain high beer quality while enhancing overall profitability by reducing unit-level brewing costs.  The first restaurant, located in St. Cloud, Minnesota, opened in July 1999.  Subsequently, the Company opened restaurants in Sioux Falls, South Dakota; Fargo, North Dakota; West Des Moines, Cedar Rapids and Davenport, Iowa; Lincoln, Nebraska; Minneapolis, Minnesota; and Wichita, Kansas.

The Company’s current expansion strategy focuses on development of restaurants in markets where management believes the Company’s concept will have broad appeal and attractive restaurant-level economics.

Interim financial statements:

The Company has prepared the condensed financial statements for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 27, 2004 and June 28, 2005 without audit by the Company’s independent auditors.  In the opinion of the Company’s management, all adjustments necessary to present fairly the financial position of the Company at June 28, 2005 and the results of operations and cash flows for the thirteen and twenty-six week periods ended June 27, 2004 and June 28, 2005 have been made. Those adjustments consist only of normal and recurring adjustments.

The balance sheet at December 28, 2004 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date, but does not include all of the information and notes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements.  Certain information and note disclosures normally included in the Company’s annual financial statements have been condensed or omitted.  These condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2004, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 24, 2005.

The results of operations for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 28, 2005 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the entire year.

Earnings (loss) per share:

Basic earnings (loss) per common share is calculated by dividing net income (loss) less the sum of preferred stock dividends declared, by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding in each year. Diluted earnings (loss) per common share assumes that outstanding common shares were increased by shares issuable upon exercise of stock options and warrants for which the market price exceeds the exercise price, less shares which could have been purchased by the Company with related proceeds.  Calculations of the Company’s net loss per common share for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 27, 2004 and June 28, 2005 are set forth in the following table:

4

2.              Stock compensation:

The Company accounts for its stock-based compensation awards using the intrinsic value method prescribed by Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.  No compensation cost has been recognized for options issued to employees when the exercise price of the options granted is at least equal to the fair value of the common stock on the date of grant.  Had compensation cost been determined consistent with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, as amended by SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation—Transition and Disclosure, the Company’s net loss and net loss per common share would have been changed to the following pro forma amounts:

The fair value of each option grant for the pro forma disclosure required by SFAS No. 123, as amended by SFAS No. 148, is estimated on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions for the grants:

5

3.              Change in capitalization:

Exercise of warrants and options:

On January 3, 2005, an employee of the Company exercised a stock option for the purchase of 1,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $1.65 per share.  These options were issued pursuant to the 1997 Stock Option Plan.

On January 27, 2005, a former employee of the Company exercised a stock option for the purchase of 18,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $1.65 per share.  These options were issued outside the Company’s plans.

On May 16, 2005, the Company issued 2,219 shares of common stock upon the cashless exercise of a warrant for the purchase of 3,955 shares of common stock originally issued April 30, 2003 to one of its agents for the private placement of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock and warrants.  The foregoing warrant had an exercise price of $1.58 per share and an expiration date of April 30, 2008.

Dividends:

On November 4, 2004, the last day shares of the Company’s Series A Convertible Preferred Stock were outstanding, the Company, pursuant to the terms of the preferred stock, authorized cash payment of dividends to holders of its preferred stock as of that date.  Such dividends aggregated $41,068 and were paid on December 31, 2004.

4.              Line of credit:

In September 2004, the Company entered into a revolving line of credit agreement with maximum availability of $750,000 with an independent financial institution.  The Company incurred no interest expense and borrowed no money against this line in the first half of fiscal year 2005.  In April 2005, the Company terminated this line of credit agreement.

5.              Reclassification:

As of June 28, 2005, the Company has reclassified certain of its restaurant operating costs relating to complimentary and employee meals from operating expenses to a contra-revenue account. This reclassification has no effect on net loss or accumulated deficit.  The total amount reclassified is reflected as a reduction of operating expenses and a corresponding reduction of revenues in the same amount in each period affected. For the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 27, 2004, the reclassification totaled $164,997 and $318,501, respectively.

6.              Leases

On February 7, 2005, the Office of the Chief Accountant of the Securities and Exchange Commission issued a letter to the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants expressing its views regarding certain operating lease-related accounting issues and their application under generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America.  In light of this letter, the Company’s management initiated a review of its lease accounting and determined that instead of accruing rent costs during the period of constructing restaurants, the Company had accrued rent beginning as of the commencement of the lease term, which was typically the commencement of operations.  Management concluded that in order to conform its method of accounting to that set forth in the letter, it would begin accruing lease costs during the construction period and capitalize the lease costs as part of the costs of the constructed property.  As a result, the Company increased its property and equipment by $603,947, and increased its other long-term liabilities by $603,947 on its consolidated balance sheet at June 28, 2005.  The Company has determined the effects of conforming to this accounting method were not material to prior years’ financial statements or the financial statements for the first quarter of 2005.

6

ITEM 2  Management’s Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation

This discussion and analysis contains various non-historical forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Exchange Act.  Although we believe that, in making any such statement, our expectations are based on reasonable assumptions, any such statement may be influenced by factors that could cause actual outcomes and results to be materially different from those projected.  When used in the following discussion, the words “anticipates,” “believes,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “estimates” and similar expressions, as they relate to us or our management, are intended to identify such forward-looking statements.  You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements, which are qualified in their entirety by the cautions and risks described herein.  Please refer to our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2004, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 24, 2005, for additional factors known to us that may cause actual results to vary.

Overview

We operate nine casual dining restaurants featuring on-premises breweries under the name Granite City Food & Brewery®.  The location of each restaurant and the month and year of its opening appear in the following chart:

We developed the foregoing restaurants using proceeds from the sale of our securities, building and equipment leases, debt financing and cash flow from operations.

The last six units were built based upon the prototype we developed in early 2003.  These units were developed under our multi-site development agreement with a commercial developer that provides us with assistance in site selection, construction management and financing for new restaurants.  Under this agreement, we lease each new restaurant from our developer.

In September 2004, we entered into a securities purchase agreement with accredited investors for the sale of approximately $8.5 million of common stock and warrants to purchase common stock.  Using the proceeds from this private placement and equipment loans as needed, we intend to add three additional restaurants in 2005, six additional restaurants in 2006, and eight additional restaurants in 2007.  The remaining restaurants we plan to open in 2005 include sites in Kansas, Minnesota and Missouri.  We anticipate that all of these restaurants will be designed based on our 2003 prototype.

7

In 2001, we developed a patent-pending brewing process called Fermentus Interruptus™.  We believe that Fermentus Interruptus improves the economics of our microbrewing process as it eliminates the initial stages of brewing and storage at multiple locations, thereby reducing equipment and development costs at new restaurant locations.  Having a common starting point for our initial brewing process creates consistency of taste for our product from unit to unit.  In December 2004, we entered into a lease agreement for a building which will facilitate the initial stage of our brewing process, the production of wort.  The non-alcoholic wort produced at this facility will be transported via truck to the fermentation vessels at each of our restaurants where the brewing process will be completed.  We believe this commissary brewing process will allow us to service approximately 30 restaurant locations from one wort production site.  We are evaluating strategies to capitalize on Fermentus Interruptus, including licensing of our brewing technology.

We believe that our operating results will fluctuate significantly because of several factors, including the timing of new restaurant openings and related expenses, profitability of new restaurants, changes in food and labor costs, increases or decreases in comparable restaurant sales, general economic conditions, consumer confidence in the economy, changes in consumer preferences, competitive factors and weather conditions.

We expect the timing of new restaurant openings to have a significant impact on restaurant revenues and costs.  We believe we will incur the most significant portion of pre-opening costs associated with a new restaurant within the two months immediately preceding, and the month of, the opening of such restaurant.

Our restaurant revenues are comprised almost entirely of the sales of food and beverages.  The sale of retail items, such as cigarettes and promotional items, typically represents approximately less than one percent of total revenue.  Product costs include the costs of food, beverages and retail items.  Labor costs include direct hourly and management wages, taxes and benefits for restaurant employees.  Direct and occupancy costs include restaurant supplies, marketing costs, rent, utilities, real estate taxes, repairs and maintenance and other related costs.  Pre-opening costs consist of direct costs related to hiring and training the initial restaurant workforce and certain other direct costs associated with opening new restaurants.  General and administrative expenses are comprised of expenses associated with all corporate and administrative functions that support existing operations, management and staff salaries, employee benefits, travel, information systems and training and market research.  Depreciation and amortization includes depreciation on capital expenditures.  Other income and expense represents the cost of interest on debt and capital leases, interest income on invested assets and loss on disposal of assets.

8

Results of Operations

The following table compares operating results expressed as a percentage of total revenue for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 27, 2004 and June 28, 2005.

Certain percentage amounts do not sum due to rounding.

Critical Accounting Policies

This discussion and analysis is based upon our financial statements, which were prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America.  These principles require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes.  We believe our estimates and assumptions are reasonable; however, actual results and the timing of the recognition of such amounts could differ from those estimates.  We have identified the following critical accounting policies and estimates utilized by management in the preparation of our financial statements:

Property and equipment

The cost of property and equipment is depreciated over the estimated useful lives of the related assets ranging from three to 20 years.  The cost of leasehold improvements is depreciated over the initial term of the related lease.  Depreciation is computed on the straight-line method for financial reporting purposes and accelerated methods for income tax purposes.  Amortization of assets acquired under capital lease is included in depreciation expense.  We review property and equipment, including leasehold improvements, for impairment when events or circumstances indicate these assets might be impaired pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 144.  We base this assessment upon the carrying value versus the fair market value of the asset and whether that difference is recoverable.  Such assessment is performed on a

9

restaurant-by-restaurant basis and includes other relevant facts and circumstances, including the physical condition of the asset.

Our accounting policies regarding property and equipment include certain management judgments regarding the estimated useful lives of such assets and the determination as to what constitutes enhancing the value of or increasing the life of existing assets.  These judgments and estimates may produce materially different amounts of depreciation and amortization expense than would be reported if different assumptions were used.

We continually reassess our assumptions and judgments and make adjustments when significant facts and circumstances dictate.  Historically, actual results have not been materially different than the estimates we have made.

Results of Operations for the Thirteen and Twenty-six Weeks Ended June 27, 2004 and June 28, 2005

Revenue

We generated $7,460,935 and $8,534,251 of revenues during the second quarter of 2004 and 2005, respectively.  During the first half of 2004 and 2005, we generated revenue of $13,600,302 and $16,404,588, respectively.  The twenty-six weeks ended June 28, 2005 included 208 restaurant weeks, which is the sum of the actual number of weeks each restaurant operated.  The twenty-six weeks ended June 27, 2004 included 161 restaurant weeks.  The increase in sales of 20.6% for the first half of the fiscal year 2005 over the first half of fiscal year 2004 was primarily the result of 47 additional restaurant weeks in 2005.

Due to increased demand fostered by the publicity surrounding the opening of a new restaurant, that restaurant typically experiences a temporary period of high revenues immediately following its opening (the “honeymoon effect”).  During the first half of 2004, we had five restaurants experiencing the honeymoon effect while no restaurants were experiencing this honeymoon effect in the first half of 2005.  As such, average weekly sales decreased from $85,758 per week in the second quarter of 2004 to $82,060 per week in the second quarter of 2005.  Average weekly sales decreased from $84,474 per week in the first half of 2004 to $78,868 per week in the first half of 2005.  Comparable restaurant sales, which include restaurants in operation over 18 months, decreased 0.6% and 2.5% in the second quarter and first half of the year, respectively.

We anticipate that restaurant revenues will vary from quarter to quarter.  We anticipate seasonal fluctuations in restaurant revenues due in part to increased outdoor seating and generally favorable weather conditions at our locations during the summer months.  Due to the honeymoon effect, we expect the timing of new restaurant openings to cause fluctuations in restaurant revenues.  Additionally, consumer confidence in the economy and changes in consumer preferences may affect our future revenues.

Restaurant Costs

Food and Beverage

Our food and beverage costs decreased 1.6% as a percentage of revenue from 31.3% in the second quarter of 2004 to 29.7% in the second quarter of 2005.  These costs decreased 1.2% as a percentage of revenue from 31.0% in the first half of 2004 to 29.8% in the first half of 2005.  These decreases were due primarily to more staff members becoming familiar with our operations, thereby generating less waste, since our most recent restaurant opening in June 2004.

We expect that our food and beverage costs will vary going forward due to numerous variables, including seasonal changes in food costs and guest preferences.  We periodically create new menu offerings and introduce new craftbrewed beers based upon guest preferences.  Although such menu modifications may temporarily result in increased food and beverage cost, we believe we are able to offset such increases with

10

our weekly specials which provide variety and value to our guests.  Our varieties of craftbrewed beer, which we can produce at lower cost than beers we purchase for resale, also enable us to keep our food and beverage costs low while fulfilling guest requests and building customer loyalty.  As we have opened additional units, we have experienced increased purchasing power and believe we will continue to do so with additional expansion, thereby partially offsetting food and beverage cost increases and maintaining or reducing our food and beverage costs as a percentage of revenue.  Additionally, as we add new units, we believe our brewing process, Fermentus Interruptus, will allow us to keep our high quality product intact while reducing production cost, thereby enhancing overall profitability.

Labor

Our labor costs expressed as a percentage of revenue decreased 0.2% from 33.9% in the second quarter of 2004 to 33.7% in the second quarter of 2005.  These costs increased 0.5% as a percentage of revenue from 33.6% in the first half of 2004 to 34.1% in the first half of 2005.  The overall increase in labor costs for the first half of 2005 was due primarily to increases in management wages, health insurance and workers compensation insurance expenses.

We expect that labor costs will vary as we add new restaurants.  Minimum wage laws, local labor laws and practices, as well as unemployment rates vary from state to state and will affect our labor costs, as will hiring and training expenses at our new units.  Our management believes that retaining good employees and more experienced staff ensures high quality guest service and reduces hiring and training costs.

Direct and Occupancy

Our direct and occupancy expenses increased 1.1% as a percentage of revenues from 16.3% in the second quarter of 2004 to 17.4% in the second quarter of 2005.  These expenses increased 1.0% from 17.1% in the first half of 2004 to 18.1% in the first half of 2005.  Operating supplies, rent and occupancy costs, repairs and maintenance, promotions and restaurant-level administrative expense represent the majority of our direct and occupancy expenses, a substantial portion of which is fixed or indirectly variable.  These increases in direct and occupancy expense were due primarily to the increase in the cost of utilities.

Pre-Opening Costs

Pre-opening costs during the first half of 2004 represented a portion of the pre-opening costs at our Davenport and Minneapolis restaurants as well as all such costs related to our Lincoln restaurant.  Pre-opening costs in the first half of 2005 related to our Wichita restaurant which we opened July 5, 2005.  Based upon the costs of labor, travel, lodging and training incurred prior to opening, we expect pre-opening expenses to average between $275,000 and $300,000 per unit.  Such costs are primarily incurred in the month of, and two months prior to, the restaurant opening.

General and Administrative

General and administrative expenses include salaries and benefits associated with our corporate staff that is responsible for overall restaurant quality, future expansion into new locations and financial controls and reporting.  Other general and administrative expenses include advertising, professional fees, office administration, centralized accounting system costs, and travel by our corporate management to the restaurant locations.  General and administrative expenses increased $573,578 from $605,478 in the second quarter of 2004 to $1,179,056 in the second quarter of 2005.  Such expenses increased $937,347 from $1,194,062 in the first half of 2004 to $2,131,409 in the first half of 2005.  In order to retain and recruit core management and further build our infrastructure to facilitate growth and allow for restaurant management attrition, we incurred increased expenses primarily related to payroll, employee benefits, recruiting and relocation.  Additionally, our professional fees, including investor relations, legal and accounting increased in the first half of 2005 over the first half of 2004.

11

We expect that general and administrative costs will continue to fluctuate as a percentage of restaurant revenues in the near term as we build our infrastructure to adequately sustain operations through further expansion.  The anticipated additional restaurant revenues associated with further expansion are expected to result in greater economies of scale for our corporate expenses in the long term.

Depreciation and Amortization

Depreciation and amortization expense increased $106,418 during the second quarter of 2005 and $220,774 during the first half of 2005 compared to the same periods in 2004, due principally to the additional depreciation related to the newly opened restaurants. As a percentage of revenues, depreciation expense increased 0.4% from 5.3% in the first half of 2004 to 5.7% in the first half of 2005.

Other Income and Expense

Interest expense increased $41,770 and $133,585 in the second quarter and first half of 2005 compared to the second quarter and first half of 2004, respectively, due to an increase in debt and capital leases as a result of additional restaurants.  Interest income increased $30,864 and $65,154 in the second quarter and first half of 2005 compared to the second quarter and first half of 2004, respectively, due to interest earned on cash obtained from the sale of our securities in September 2004.  Management expects interest expense will increase and interest income will decrease as we pursue our three-year expansion schedule.  As we completed the remodeling of our three older restaurants to mirror the 2003 prototype, we recorded a $50,475 loss on assets which had not been fully depreciated.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We have funded our capital requirements since inception through sales of securities, building and equipment leases, debt financing and cash flow from operations.  As of June 28, 2005, we had net working capital of $3,030,342, compared to net working capital of $6,216,713 at December 28, 2004.

During the twenty-six weeks ended June 28, 2005, we used $467,519 of net cash in operating activities, $2,691,852 in net cash to purchase equipment and other assets primarily for our wort production facility and our Wichita, Eagan and Kansas City locations, and made payments aggregating $385,444 on our debt and capital lease obligations.  Additionally, during the first quarter of 2005, we paid cash dividends to shareholders of our preferred stock aggregating $41,068 and received net cash of $31,349 from the issuance of our common stock upon the exercise of options and warrants.

During the twenty-six weeks ended June 27, 2004, operating activities provided us $663,003 of cash, issuance of common stock pursuant to the exercise of warrants provided us $79,977 in cash and proceeds from long-term debt and our line of credit provided us $845,348 net cash.  We used $2,009,186 of cash to purchase equipment and other assets primarily for our Davenport, Lincoln and Minneapolis locations, and made payments on our debt and capital lease obligations aggregating $314,627.

Using the proceeds from our 2004 private placement, we continue to expand into markets where we believe our concept will have broad appeal and attractive restaurant-level economics.  We plan to develop three additional restaurants in 2005, six additional restaurants in 2006 and eight additional restaurants in 2007.  We are utilizing the multi-site development agreement we entered into in October 2002 with Dunham Capital Management L.L.C. (“Dunham”) to facilitate this expansion plan.  Dunham is controlled by Donald A. Dunham, Jr., who is an affiliate of Granite Partners, L.L.C., a beneficial owner of approximately 1.6% of our securities.  Under this agreement, our developer provides us assistance in site selection, construction management and restaurant financing for new restaurants.

As part of our expansion strategy, we will continue using the prototype model we developed in 2003 and used for our six most recently constructed restaurants.  We anticipate that each of these prototypical restaurants will require an investment by our developer of approximately $3.5 million to $4.0 million each for

12

land, building and equipment.    We anticipate these costs will vary from one market to another based on real estate values, zoning regulations, labor markets and other variables. Under our development agreement, we will lease each new restaurant from our developer.  We anticipate that pre-opening expenses and the initial purchase of furniture, fixtures and equipment will require an investment by us of approximately $1.0 million to $1.6 million per unit.

In February 2005, we commenced leasing a building in Ellsworth, Iowa which is being constructed in accordance with our specifications by an unrelated third party. This building will be used to facilitate the initial stage of our Fermentus Interruptus brewing process, the production of wort.  We have the option to purchase the facility at any time during the lease term for one dollar plus the unamortized construction costs.  Because the construction costs will be fully amortized through payment of rent during the base term, if the option is exercised at or after the end of the initial ten-year period, the option price will be one dollar.  As such, the lease is classified as a capital lease.

In July 2005, we opened our restaurant in Wichita.   We are leasing this property from our developer under a 20-year lease agreement.   Our annual lease payments are $336,000.  This lease may be extended at our option for up to five additional five-year periods.

With cash generated from operations, proceeds from our 2004 private placement and equipment financing, management believes that we will have sufficient funds to pursue our business strategy over the next three years.  If we do not generate the cash needed from operations and/or are not able to obtain suitable equipment financing, we may have to reduce or delay our planned expansion.

Commitments and Contingent Liabilities

Operating and Capital Leases:

As of June 28, 2005, we had seven land and building lease agreements.  One of these leases expires in 2019, one in 2020, two in 2023, and the remaining three expire in 2024, all with renewable options for additional periods.  The building portions of these leases are classified as capital leases because their present value was greater than 90% of the estimated fair value at the beginning of the lease.  The land portions of these leases are classified as operating leases because the fair value of the land was more than 25% of the leased property at the inception of each lease.  Under three of the leases, we are required to pay additional percentage rent based upon restaurant sales.  As of June 28, 2005, future obligations relating to the land portion of these seven leases aggregated $14,962,101 plus percentage rent.  The scheduled rent increases for the land during the life of each lease are recognized on a straight-line basis.  Future obligations relating to the building portion of these seven leases aggregated $22,894,345 as of June 28, 2005.

In 2001, we entered into a 20-year operating lease for land upon which we built our Fargo restaurant.  As of June 28, 2005, future obligations under the terms of this lease aggregated $1,179,800 plus percentage rent.

In December 2004, we entered into a land and building lease agreement for a facility to be used for wort production.  This ten-year lease commenced February 1, 2005 and is classified as a capital lease as it contains a bargain purchase option.  As of June 28, 2005, future obligations under the terms of this lease aggregated $828,004.

As of June 28, 2005, we have additional capital lease obligations outstanding aggregating $572,333 for equipment leases expiring in 2008, and an operating lease obligation outstanding of $16,750 for a lease expiring in 2005 for office space.

We have entered into five separate 20-year net leases relating to future restaurants in Kansas, Missouri and Minnesota.  The annual rent for each lease will be equal to 10.5% of the sum of the construction cost and land cost.  The terms of these leases will commence when operations begin at each location.

13

Personal Guaranties:

Certain of our directors have personally guaranteed certain of our leases and loan agreements.  In connection with the $1.5 million loan we obtained in July 2001 to finance our Fargo restaurant, we entered into an agreement concerning guaranty which provides, among other things, that such guarantors will be indemnified from any liabilities they may incur by reason of their guaranties of our indebtedness. The agreement contains various covenants, one of which requires us to use our best efforts to obtain a release of one individual’s guarantee obligation by January 1, 2006.  If we have not accomplished this, we are obligated to pay him a monthly guarantee fee in the amount of $1,000 until such release is obtained.  Additionally, at a meeting held in March 2004, our board of directors agreed to compensate our President and Chief Executive Officer for his personal guaranties of equipment loans entered into in August 2003 and January 2004.  The amount of annual compensation is 3% of the balance of such loans.  This amount is calculated and accrued based on the weighted average daily balances of such loans at the end of each monthly accounting period.  As of June 28, 2005, $33,896 of loan guarantee fees were included as a liability on our balance sheet, $19,002 of which was accrued during the twenty-six weeks ended June 28, 2005.

Employment Agreement:

We have entered into an employment agreement with our President and Chief Executive Officer.  In lieu of a salary, we issued stock options to him in 1999, 2001 and 2003 as compensation for his services through March 30, 2003.  Effective April 1, 2003, we began paying an annual salary to such officer.  Among other provisions, the employment agreement includes change in control provisions that would entitle him to receive severance pay equal to 18 months of salary if there is a change in control of our company and his employment terminates.  On March 15, 2005, the Compensation Committee of our board of directors authorized a new three-year employment and compensation arrangement with him.  The arrangement provides for a minimum base salary of $225,000, commencing January 1, 2005, cash incentive compensation for 2005 ranging from $0 to $125,550 based on performance, and a stock option for the purchase of 150,000 shares of common stock.

Development Agreement:

We have entered into a development agreement with Dunham for the development of our restaurants.  The agreement gives Dunham the right to develop, construct and lease up to 22 restaurants for us prior to December 31, 2012.  We are not bound to authorize the construction of restaurants during that time period, but generally cannot use another developer to develop or own a restaurant as long as the development agreement is in effect.  We can use another developer if Dunham declines to build a particular restaurant, if the agreement is terminated because of a default by Dunham, or if our company is sold or merged into another company.  In the case of a merger or sale of our company, the development agreement may be terminated at such time as Dunham has completed seven restaurants under the agreement.  As of June 28, 2005, six restaurants had been constructed for us under this development agreement.

The development agreement provides for a cooperative process between Dunham and our company for the selection of restaurant sites and the development of restaurants on those sites, scheduling for the development and construction of each restaurant once a location is approved, and controls on the costs of development and construction using bidding and guaranteed maximum cost concepts.  The development agreement provides that restaurants will be leased to us on the basis of a triple net lease.  The rental rate of each lease will be calculated using a variable formula which is based on approved and specified costs of development and construction and an indexed interest rate.  The term of each lease is 20 years with five five-year options to renew.

14

Summary of Contractual Obligations:

The following table summarizes our obligations under contractual agreements as of June 28, 2005 and the time frame within which payments on such obligations are due.  This table does not include amounts related to percentage rent as such amounts have not yet been determined.  In addition, whether we would incur any additional expense on our employment agreement with Mr. Wagenheim depends upon the existence of a change in control of the company.  Therefore, no percentage rent nor severance expense has been included in the following table.

Based on our working capital position at June 28, 2005, we believe we have sufficient working capital to meet our current obligations.

Qualitative and Quantitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Our company is exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates on debt and changes in commodity prices.

Changes in Interest Rate:

In February 2007, we will have a balloon payment due of approximately $1,325,000 on the loan we obtained from an independent financial institution in July 2001.  Currently, this loan bears a fixed interest rate of 8.75%. If it becomes necessary to refinance such balloon balance, we may not be able to secure financing at the same interest rate.  The effect of a higher interest rate would depend upon the negotiated financing terms.

Changes in Commodity Prices:

                                                Many of the food products we purchase are affected by commodity pricing and are, therefore, subject to unpredictable price volatility.   These commodities are generally purchased based upon market prices established with vendors.  Extreme fluctuations in commodity prices and/or long-term changes could have an adverse affect on us.  Although SYSCO Corporation is our primary supplier of food, substantially all of the food and supplies we purchase are available from several sources, which helps to control commodity price risks.  Additionally, we have the ability to increase menu prices, or vary the menu items offered, in response to a food product price increases.  If, however, competitive circumstances limit our menu price flexibility, margins could be negatively impacted.

Our company does not enter into derivative contracts either to hedge existing risks or for speculative purposes.

15

Seasonality

We expect that our sales and earnings will fluctuate based on seasonal patterns.  We anticipate that our highest sales and earnings will occur in the second and third quarters due to the milder climate and availability of outdoor seating during those quarters in our existing and proposed markets.

Inflation

The primary inflationary factors affecting our operations are food, supplies and labor costs.  A large number of our restaurant personnel are paid at rates based on the applicable minimum wage, and increases in the minimum wage directly affect our labor costs.  In the past, we have been able to minimize the effect of these increases through menu price increases and other strategies.  To date, inflation has not had a material impact on our operating results.

ITEM 3                                                        Controls and Procedures

We maintain a system of disclosure controls and procedures that is designed to provide reasonable assurance that information, which is required to be disclosed, is accumulated and communicated to management timely.  At the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15.  Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

During our most recent fiscal quarter, there has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

16

PART II          OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1                                                      Legal Proceedings

Not applicable.

ITEM 2                                                      Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

(a)                                  On May 16, 2005, we issued 2,219 shares of common stock upon the cashless exercise of a warrant for the purchase of 3,955 shares of common stock originally issued April 30, 2003 to one of our agents for the private placement of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock and warrants.  The foregoing warrant had an exercise price of $1.58 per share and an expiration date of April 30, 2008.

The foregoing issuance was made in reliance upon the exemption provided in Section 4(2) of the Securities Act.  The certificate representing such securities contains a restrictive legend preventing sale, transfer or other disposition, absent registration or an applicable exemption from registration requirements.  The recipient of such securities received, or had access to, material information concerning our company, including, but not limited to, our reports on Form 10-KSB, Form 10-QSB, and Form 8-K, as filed with the SEC.  No discount or commission was paid in connection with the issuance of common stock upon exercise of the warrant.

(b)                                 Not applicable.

(c)                                  Not applicable.

ITEM 3                                                      Defaults upon Senior Securities

Not applicable.

ITEM 4                                                      Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

Not applicable.

ITEM 5                                                      Other Information

Not applicable.

ITEM 6                                                      Exhibits

See “Index to Exhibits.”

17

SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

18

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

19