UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
MB FINANCIAL, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Maryland |
|
0-24566-01 |
|
36-4460265 |
(State or other jurisdiction |
|
(Commission File No.) |
|
(IRS Employer |
801 West Madison Street, Chicago, Illinois 60607
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (312) 633-0333
N/A
(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)
Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:
o Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
o Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)
o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))
o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17CFR 240.13e-4(c))
Item 7.01. Regulation FD Disclosure
Forward-Looking Statements
When used in this presentation and in filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, in other press releases or other public shareholder communications, or in oral statements made with the approval of an authorized executive officer, the words or phrases believe, will likely result, are expected to, will continue, is anticipated, estimate, project, plans, or similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made. These statements may relate to future financial performance, strategic plans or objectives, revenues or earnings projections, or other financial items. By their nature, these statements are subject to numerous uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated in the statements.
Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results anticipated or projected include, but are not limited to, the following: (1) expected cost savings and synergies from our merger and acquisition activities might not be realized within the expected time frames, and costs or difficulties relating to integration matters might be greater than expected; (2) expenses associated with the planned expansion of our retail branch services and business hours during the second half of 2005 might be greater than expected, whether due to a possible need to hire more employees than currently anticipated or other costs incurred in excess of estimated amounts; (3) the credit risks of lending activities, including changes in the level and direction of loan delinquencies and write-offs and changes in estimates of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses; (4) competitive pressures among depository institutions; (5) interest rate movements and their impact on customer behavior and net interest margin; (6) the impact of repricing and competitors pricing initiatives on loan and deposit products; (7) the ability to adapt successfully to technological changes to meet customers needs and developments in the market place; (8) MB Financials ability to realize the residual values of its direct finance, leveraged, and operating leases; (9) the ability to access cost-effective funding; (10) changes in financial markets; (11) changes in economic conditions in general and in the Chicago metropolitan area in particular; (12) the costs, effects and outcomes of litigation; (13) new legislation or regulatory changes, including but not limited to changes in federal and/or state tax laws or interpretations thereof by taxing authorities; (14) changes in accounting principles, policies or guidelines; and (15) future acquisitions by MB Financial of other depository institutions or lines of business.
MB Financial does not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect circumstances or events that occur after the date on which the forward-looking statement is made.
Set forth below are investor presentation materials.
2
Searchable text section of graphics shown above
[LOGO]
West Coast
Super-Community Bank Conference
Mitchell Feiger, President and Chief Executive Officer
Jill E. York, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
September 9, 2005
NASDAQ: MBFI
Forward Looking Statements
When used in this presentation and in filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, in other press releases or other public shareholder communications, or in oral statements made with the approval of an authorized executive officer, the words or phrases believe, will likely result, are expected to, will continue, is anticipated, estimate, project, plans, or similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made. These statements may relate to future financial performance, strategic plans or objectives, revenues or earnings projections, or other financial items. By their nature, these statements are subject to numerous uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated in the statements.
Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results anticipated or projected include, but are not limited to, the following: (1) expected cost savings and synergies from our merger and acquisition activities might not be realized within the expected time frames, and costs or difficulties relating to integration matters might be greater than expected; (2) the credit risks of lending activities, including changes in the level and direction of loan delinquencies and write-offs and changes in estimates of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses; (3) competitive pressures among depository institutions; (4) interest rate movements and their impact on customer behavior and net interest margin; (5) the impact of repricing and competitors pricing initiatives on loan and deposit products; (6) the ability to adapt successfully to technological changes to meet customers needs and developments in the market place; (7) MB Financials ability to realize the residual values of its direct finance, leveraged, and operating leases; (8) the ability to access cost-effective funding; (9) changes in financial markets; (10) changes in economic conditions in general and in the Chicago metropolitan area in particular; (11) the costs, effects and outcomes of litigation; (12) new legislation or regulatory changes, including but not limited to changes in federal and/or state tax laws or interpretations thereof by taxing authorities; (13) changes in accounting principles, policies or guidelines; and (14) future acquisitions by MB Financial of other depository institutions or lines of business.
MB Financial does not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect circumstances or events that occur after the date on which the forward-looking statement is made.
[LOGO]
2
MB Financial Snapshot
(Dollars amounts in millions, except per share data)
|
|
2nd Qtr |
|
2nd Qtr |
|
|
|
||
|
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
Change |
|
||
Assets |
|
$ |
4,996 |
|
$ |
5,589 |
|
+11.9 |
% |
Loans |
|
$ |
3,193 |
|
$ |
3,647 |
|
+14.2 |
% |
Deposits |
|
$ |
3,759 |
|
$ |
4,171 |
|
+11.0 |
% |
Net income |
|
$ |
15.5 |
|
$ |
18.0 |
|
+16.3 |
% |
Fully diluted EPS |
|
$ |
0.55 |
|
$ |
0.62 |
|
+12.7 |
% |
Return on equity - annualized |
|
15.33 |
% |
14.96 |
% |
-0.37 |
% |
||
Cash return on tangible equity - annualized* |
|
20.17 |
% |
20.80 |
% |
+0.63 |
% |
||
Net interest margin - FTE - annualized* |
|
3.72 |
% |
3.78 |
% |
+0.06 |
% |
||
Efficiency ratio |
|
54.60 |
% |
54.29 |
% |
-0.31 |
% |
||
Non-performing loan ratio |
|
0.90 |
% |
0.66 |
% |
-0.24 |
% |
* See Non-GAAP Disclosure Reconciliations on page 30.
3
(Dollars amounts in millions, except per share data)
|
|
2000 |
|
2004 |
|
Change |
|
||
Assets |
|
$ |
3,287 |
|
$ |
5,254 |
|
+59.8 |
% |
Loans |
|
$ |
2,019 |
|
$ |
3,346 |
|
+65.7 |
% |
Deposits |
|
$ |
2,639 |
|
$ |
3,962 |
|
+50.1 |
% |
Net income |
|
$ |
27.0 |
|
$ |
64.4 |
|
+138.6 |
% |
Fully diluted EPS |
|
$ |
1.02 |
|
$ |
2.25 |
|
+120.6 |
% |
Return on equity |
|
10.24 |
% |
14.88 |
% |
+4.64 |
% |
||
Cash return on tangible equity* |
|
13.00 |
% |
20.69 |
% |
+7.69 |
% |
||
Net interest margin - FTE* |
|
3.75 |
% |
3.79 |
% |
+0.04 |
% |
||
Efficiency ratio |
|
64.80 |
% |
53.68 |
% |
-11.12 |
% |
||
Non-performing loan ratio |
|
0.81 |
% |
0.71 |
% |
-0.10 |
% |
* See Non-GAAP Disclosure Reconciliations on page 30.
4
Marketplace Dynamics
Fragmented banking market
Slowly consolidating
Target market includes 8,000+ middle market companies
[GRAPHIC]
5
Bank Holding Companies
Cook County Deposit Market Share
As of June 30, 2004
Pending Ownership as of September 2, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Branch |
|
Market |
|
Market |
|
Rank |
|
Institution |
|
Count |
|
($000s) |
|
Share |
|
1 |
|
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NY) (Bank One) |
|
183 |
|
28,240,123 |
|
18.9 |
% |
2 |
|
LaSalle Bank Corporation (IL) |
|
91 |
|
26,063,977 |
|
17.4 |
% |
3 |
|
BMO Financial Group (Harris) |
|
76 |
|
14,937,173 |
|
10.0 |
% |
4 |
|
Northern Trust Corp. (IL) |
|
9 |
|
6,369,328 |
|
4.3 |
% |
5 |
|
Royal Bank of Scotland Group (Charter One) |
|
82 |
|
4,805,561 |
|
3.2 |
% |
6 |
|
Citigroup Inc. (NY) |
|
39 |
|
4,421,363 |
|
3.0 |
% |
7 |
|
Fifth Third Bancorp (OH) |
|
40 |
|
3,527,520 |
|
2.4 |
% |
8 |
|
MAF Bancorp Inc. (IL) |
|
34 |
|
3,430,691 |
|
2.3 |
% |
9 |
|
MB Financial Inc. (IL) |
|
36 |
|
3,242,330 |
|
2.2 |
% |
10 |
|
Bank of America Corp. (NC) |
|
14 |
|
3,087,480 |
|
2.1 |
% |
11 |
|
Corus Bankshares Inc. (IL) |
|
14 |
|
2,993,795 |
|
2.0 |
% |
12 |
|
Wintrust Financial Corp. (IL) |
|
23 |
|
2,392,615 |
|
1.6 |
% |
13 |
|
FBOP Corp. (IL) |
|
21 |
|
2,118,074 |
|
1.4 |
% |
14 |
|
Taylor Capital Group Inc. (IL) |
|
12 |
|
2,109,047 |
|
1.4 |
% |
15 |
|
Metropolitan Bank Group Inc. (IL) |
|
65 |
|
1,905,509 |
|
1.3 |
% |
16 |
|
TCF Financial Corp. (MN) |
|
117 |
|
1,896,575 |
|
1.3 |
% |
17 |
|
First Midwest Bancorp Inc. (IL) |
|
17 |
|
1,696,963 |
|
1.1 |
% |
18 |
|
Parkway Bancorp Inc. (IL) |
|
14 |
|
1,331,845 |
|
0.9 |
% |
19 |
|
Popular Inc. (PR) |
|
17 |
|
1,255,821 |
|
0.8 |
% |
20 |
|
U.S. Bancorp (MN) |
|
24 |
|
1,205,083 |
|
0.8 |
% |
Source - SNL Datasource
6
Key Strategies
Our EPS growth has been fueled by dual growth sources
Core business lines are growing
Commercial Banking
Wealth Management
Retail Banking
Mergers and acquisitions supplement core business growth
[CHART]
* Includes $19.2 million after tax merger charge.
7
Commercial Banking
Well developed business line
Target market is companies with revenues ranging from $5 to 100 million
Heavy investment in personnel over past 10 years
Robust training program for recent graduates
Focused on:
Middle-market business financing
Treasury management
Real estate investor, construction, developer financing
Lease banking
[CHART]
8
Market Feedback
Based upon third party research, commercial client satisfaction leads the market.
9 out of 10 customers with sales over $10 million in 2004 said MB Financial Bank was:
Excellent or Above Average in overall satisfaction.
Above market standard for prompt follow-up and closure on requests.
Excellent or Above Average on top management support.
9
Commercial Banking - Diversified Loan Portfolio
As of June 30, 2005
Loan Portfolio Composition |
|
Commercial Loans by Industry Type |
|
|
|
[CHART] |
|
[CHART] |
* Includes Lease Loans.
10
Credit Quality
Excellent, stable, predictable
Improving non-performing loan ratios
Loans are granular typical size is $3 to $6 million; 88% of credits are under $15 million.
Extensive due diligence prior to acquisitions
Net Charge-offs to Average Loans |
|
Allowance vs. NPL to Total Loans |
|
|
|
[CHART] |
|
[CHART] |
11
Granularity of Non-Performing Loans
As of June 30, 2005
|
|
Number of |
|
Outstanding |
|
Percent of |
|
|
Non-performing Loan Size |
|
Credits |
|
Balance |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Over $3.0 million |
|
1 |
|
$ |
4,181 |
|
17.5 |
% |
$2.0 to $3.0 million |
|
2 |
|
5,208 |
|
21.7 |
% |
|
$1.0 to $2.0 million |
|
2 |
|
2,368 |
|
9.9 |
% |
|
Less $1.0 million |
|
151 |
|
12,193 |
|
50.9 |
% |
|
Total |
|
156 |
|
$ |
23,950 |
|
100.0 |
% |
12
Retail Banking
Consumer and small business
Deposit and credit services
11% annual deposit growth over past five years
Growing transaction accounts
Sales/service culture
Cost efficient lending platform
Upgrading branches and branch locations to maximize growth and profitability
13
Betsimpsier
Deposit Strategy
Better. Simpler. Easier.
Goals
Improve deposit growth
Improve deposit mix
Reduce funding costs
Implementation activities
Extended hours
Simplified transaction processes
Consistent customer experience
More ATMs
Increased marketing and advertising
Better. Simpler. Easier. Betsimpsier!
7 days a week. Open early. Open late.
[LOGO]
14
Better. Simpler. Easier. Betsimpsier!
[LOGO] |
|
7 Days A Week. Open Early. Open Late. |
Additional expenses to support strategy
Personnel
50 FTEs added
$750 thousand increase in salary and benefits expense in second half of 2005
Marketing
In July media rollout supporting strategy began
Majority of our second half 2005 marketing dollars are reserved for Betsimpsier
Total marketing for second half 2005 including Betsimpsier and other various marketing initiatives will total $4.0 million
15
Wealth Management
Expanding business and capabilities
Private Banking
Staff are deep generalists (loans, deposits, asset management and trust services, estate and financial planning)
Asset Management and Trust
Open architecture asset management format
Objective advice
Superior returns
Vision Investment Services
Provides brokerage services through MB and other banks
Works closely with MB Retail Banking
16
Significant opportunity for growth within MB Financial customer base
Adding revenue producing people and capabilities
Adding investment management depth
Continuing to upgrade relationships from custodied to managed
[CHART]
17
M & A Highlights
2001 to 2004
|
|
Assets |
|
|
1990 to 2000 (10 mergers and acquisitions) |
|
$ |
1.9 billion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired FSL Holdings, Inc. |
|
$ |
222 million |
|
April 2001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MidCity Financial and MB Financial merge |
|
MOE |
|
|
November 2001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired Lincolnwood Financial Corp. |
|
$ |
228 million |
|
April 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired LaSalle Systems Leasing |
|
$ |
92 million |
|
August 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired South Holland Bancorp |
|
$ |
560 million |
|
February 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Divested Abrams Centre Bancshares |
|
$ |
98 million |
|
May 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired First SecurityFed Financial |
|
$ |
567 million |
|
May 2004 |
|
|
|
18
Recent Acquisition Pricing
|
|
|
|
P/E |
|
|
|
Prem/ |
|
Transaction |
|
P/E |
|
Adj* |
|
P/B |
|
Dep |
|
FSL |
|
21.7 |
|
9.7 |
|
1.2 |
|
4.3 |
% |
Lincolnwood |
|
14.4 |
|
9.7 |
|
1.6 |
|
6.9 |
% |
LaSalle Leasing |
|
10.0 |
|
6.3 |
|
1.3 |
|
N/A |
|
South Holland |
|
18.1 |
|
10.3 |
|
1.2 |
|
4.4 |
% |
First SecurityFed |
|
16.8 |
|
9.8 |
|
1.7 |
|
18.8 |
% |
* P/E Adj is computed as (price excess equity) / (pre-acquisition core earnings + after-tax cost savings in year one after tax earnings on excess equity).
19
|
|
|
|
1st Yr |
|
1st Yr |
|
Transaction |
|
IRR |
|
EPS |
|
Saves |
|
FSL |
|
27 |
% |
+3.5 |
% |
42 |
% |
Lincolnwood |
|
27 |
% |
+4.5 |
% |
50 |
% |
LaSalle Leasing |
|
22 |
% |
+3.4 |
% |
0 |
% |
South Holland |
|
22 |
% |
+3.5 |
% |
21 |
% |
First SecurityFed* |
|
21 |
% |
+3.5 |
% |
15 |
% |
* For First SecurityFed, second year EPS accretion is projected to be 3.8% and second year cost saves are estimated to be 32%.
20
MB Financial Performance
Five years of strong results
Robust core business growth
Capitalized on M&A opportunities
|
|
Dollars in millions, except per share amounts. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2000 to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Growth |
|
1st Half |
|
1st Half |
|
% |
|
|||||||
|
|
2000 |
|
2001* |
|
2002 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
Rate |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
Change |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Assets |
|
$ |
3,287 |
|
$ |
3,466 |
|
$ |
3,760 |
|
$ |
4,355 |
|
$ |
5,254 |
|
12 |
% |
$ |
4,996 |
|
$ |
5,589 |
|
11.9 |
% |
Loans |
|
$ |
2,019 |
|
$ |
2,312 |
|
$ |
2,505 |
|
$ |
2,826 |
|
$ |
3,346 |
|
13 |
% |
$ |
3,193 |
|
$ |
3,647 |
|
14.2 |
% |
Deposits |
|
$ |
2,639 |
|
$ |
2,822 |
|
$ |
3,020 |
|
$ |
3,432 |
|
$ |
3,962 |
|
11 |
% |
$ |
3,759 |
|
$ |
4,171 |
|
11.0 |
% |
Net income |
|
$ |
27.0 |
|
$ |
12.4 |
|
$ |
46.4 |
|
$ |
53.4 |
|
$ |
64.4 |
|
24 |
% |
$ |
30.1 |
|
$ |
35.2 |
|
17.0 |
% |
Diluted EPS |
|
$ |
1.02 |
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
$ |
1.75 |
|
$ |
1.96 |
|
$ |
2.25 |
|
22 |
% |
$ |
1.08 |
|
$ |
1.21 |
|
12.0 |
% |
ROA - annualized |
|
0.85 |
% |
0.36 |
% |
1.27 |
% |
1.28 |
% |
1.34 |
% |
|
|
1.34 |
% |
1.31 |
% |
|
|
|||||||
ROE - annualized |
|
10.24 |
% |
4.27 |
% |
14.60 |
% |
14.82 |
% |
14.88 |
% |
|
|
15.29 |
% |
14.72 |
% |
|
|
|||||||
Cash ROTE - annualized** |
|
13.00 |
% |
13.53 |
% |
17.09 |
% |
18.79 |
% |
20.69 |
% |
|
|
19.69 |
% |
20.50 |
% |
|
|
* |
|
Includes $19.2 million net merger expenses. |
|
|
|
** |
|
See Non-GAAP Disclosure Reconciliations on page 30. |
21
Net Interest Income
NII consistently growing as we expand our business
NIM has been stable through various interest rate environments
Funding sources are stable
Net Interest Income |
|
NIM vs. Fed Funds Rate |
|
|
|
[CHART] |
|
[CHART] |
22
Interest Rate Risk As of June 30, 2005
Slightly asset sensitive
Naturally hedged
NII Sensitivity (Ramped) |
|
NII Sensitivity (Shocked) |
|
|
|
[CHART] |
|
[CHART] |
|
|
|
Twist Scenario |
||
|
||
[CHART] |
23
Other Income
Diversifying revenue sources
Wealth Management, Deposit Services and Lease Banking are strong contributors to growth
Other category includes securities and asset gains and varies significantly
[CHART]
24
Efficiency Ratio
We carefully manage expenses
We are making investments in revenue producing personnel
Extensive investing in infrastructure electronic and physical
Investing in Betsimpsier deposit strategy
[CHART]
* Excludes $19.2 million after tax merger charge.
25
Cash Return on Tangible Equity
[CHART]
* Excludes $19.2 million after tax merger charge.
See Non-GAAP Disclosure Reconciliations on page 30.
26
Key Investment Considerations
Strategy
Build market share in key business lines (Commercial, Retail, Wealth Management)
Diversify revenue streams
Lower cost of funds
Capitalize on key M&A opportunities
Invest in people and process
Results
Strong, consistent loan growth
Stable credit quality
Robust EPS growth
High return on equity/tangible equity
Increasing commercial market share
27
Non-GAAP Disclosure Reconciliations
These materials contain certain financial measures determined by methods other than in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). Such measures include cash return on tangible equity and net interest margin on a fully tax equivalent basis.
Cash return on tangible equity is determined by dividing cash earnings by average tangible stockholders equity. The most directly comparable GAAP measure, return on equity, is determined by dividing net income by average stockholders equity. Cash earnings excludes from net income the effect of amortization expense for intangible assets other than goodwill (which is not amortized but tested for impairment annually), and average tangible stockholders equity excludes from average stockholders equity acquisition-related goodwill and other intangible assets, net of tax benefit. We believe that the presentation of cash return on tangible equity is helpful in understanding our financial results, as it provides a method to assess our success in utilizing our tangible capital.
Net interest margin on a fully tax equivalent basis is determined by dividing net interest income on a fully tax equivalent basis by average interest-earning assets. The most directly comparable GAAP measure, net interest margin, is determined by dividing net interest income by average interest-earning assets. The tax equivalent adjustment to net interest income recognizes the income tax savings when comparing taxable and tax-exempt assets and assumes a 35% tax rate. We believe that it is a standard practice in the banking industry to present net interest margin on a fully tax equivalent basis, and accordingly believe that providing this measure may be useful for peer comparison purposes.
The following tables reconcile cash earnings to net income, average tangible stockholders equity to average stockholders equity and net interest margin on a fully tax equivalent basis to net interest margin for the periods presented: (dollars in thousands)
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2nd Qtr |
|
2nd Qtr |
|
YTD |
|
YTD |
|
|||||||||
|
|
2000 |
|
2001 |
|
2002 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
|||||||||
Net income, as reported |
|
$ |
26,961 |
|
$ |
31,538 |
|
$ |
46,370 |
|
$ |
53,392 |
|
$ |
64,429 |
|
$ |
15,470 |
|
$ |
17,987 |
|
$ |
30,058 |
|
$ |
35,164 |
|
Plus: Intangible amortization, net of tax benefit |
|
3,022 |
|
3,212 |
|
631 |
|
754 |
|
660 |
|
173 |
|
163 |
|
361 |
|
336 |
|
|||||||||
Cash earnings |
|
$ |
29,983 |
|
$ |
34,750 |
|
$ |
47,001 |
|
$ |
54,146 |
|
$ |
65,089 |
|
$ |
15,643 |
|
$ |
18,150 |
|
$ |
30,419 |
|
$ |
35,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Average stockholders equity |
|
$ |
263,311 |
|
$ |
289,291 |
|
$ |
317,693 |
|
$ |
360,210 |
|
$ |
432,992 |
|
$ |
405,920 |
|
$ |
482,291 |
|
$ |
395,274 |
|
$ |
481,611 |
|
Less: Goodwill |
|
27,634 |
|
30,439 |
|
40,773 |
|
67,391 |
|
110,302 |
|
87,016 |
|
123,691 |
|
78,655 |
|
123,659 |
|
|||||||||
Less: Other intangible assets, net of tax benefit |
|
5,049 |
|
2,082 |
|
1,914 |
|
4,692 |
|
8,038 |
|
7,005 |
|
8,572 |
|
5,912 |
|
8,657 |
|
|||||||||
Average tangible stockholders equity |
|
$ |
230,628 |
|
$ |
256,770 |
|
$ |
275,006 |
|
$ |
288,127 |
|
$ |
314,652 |
|
$ |
311,899 |
|
$ |
350,028 |
|
$ |
310,707 |
|
$ |
349,295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Cash Return on Tangible Equity - Annualized |
|
13.00 |
% |
13.53 |
% |
17.09 |
% |
18.79 |
% |
20.69 |
% |
20.17 |
% |
20.80 |
% |
19.69 |
% |
20.50 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2nd Qtr |
|
2nd Qtr |
|
YTD |
|
YTD |
|
|
|
2000 |
|
2001 |
|
2002 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
Net interest margin |
|
3.66 |
% |
3.65 |
% |
3.97 |
% |
3.72 |
% |
3.69 |
% |
3.62 |
% |
3.67 |
% |
3.62 |
% |
3.68 |
% |
Plus: Tax equivalent effect |
|
0.09 |
% |
0.08 |
% |
0.06 |
% |
0.08 |
% |
0.10 |
% |
0.10 |
% |
0.11 |
% |
0.10 |
% |
0.11 |
% |
Net interest margin, fully tax equivalent - Annualized |
|
3.75 |
% |
3.73 |
% |
4.03 |
% |
3.80 |
% |
3.79 |
% |
3.72 |
% |
3.78 |
% |
3.72 |
% |
3.79 |
% |
30
[LOGO]
West Coast
Super-Community Bank Conference
Mitchell Feiger, President and Chief Executive Officer
Jill E. York, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
September 9, 2005
NASDAQ: MBFI
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, MB Financial, Inc. has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on the 8th day of September, 2005.
MB FINANCIAL, INC. |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
By: |
|
/s/ Jill E. York |
|
Jill E. York |
|||
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|||
(Principal Financial and Principal Accounting Officer) |
3