UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Quarterly Period Ended June 28, 2009
Commission File Number 1-4949
CUMMINS INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Indiana |
|
35-0257090 |
500 Jackson Street
Box 3005
Columbus, Indiana 47202-3005
(Address of principal executive offices)
Telephone (812) 377-5000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definition of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer x |
Accelerated filer o |
Non-accelerated filer o |
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No x
As of June 28, 2009, there were 201,805,312 shares of common stock outstanding with a par value of $2.50 per share.
Website Access to Companys Reports
Cummins maintains an internet website at www.cummins.com. Investors can obtain copies of our filings from this website free of charge as soon as reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed with, or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission.
CUMMINS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
|
|
Page |
|
|
|
|
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 1. |
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) |
3 |
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the three and six months ended June 28, 2009, and June 29, 2008 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 28, 2009, and December 31, 2008 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 28, 2009, and June 29, 2008 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity for the six months ended June 28, 2009, and June 29, 2008 |
6 |
|
|
|
|
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements |
7 |
|
|
|
ITEM 2. |
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
22 |
|
|
|
ITEM 3. |
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
40 |
|
|
|
ITEM 4. |
Controls and Procedures |
40 |
|
|
|
|
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
ITEM 1. |
Legal Proceedings |
41 |
|
|
|
ITEM 1A. |
Risk Factors Relating to Our Business |
41 |
|
|
|
ITEM 2. |
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
47 |
|
|
|
ITEM 4. |
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
48 |
|
|
|
ITEM 6. |
Exhibits |
48 |
|
|
|
|
Signatures |
49 |
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. Condensed Financial Statements
CUMMINS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited)
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Six months ended |
|
||||||||
|
|
June 28, |
|
June 29, |
|
June 28, |
|
June 29, |
|
||||
In millions (except per share amounts) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
||||
NET SALES (a) |
|
$ |
2,431 |
|
$ |
3,887 |
|
$ |
4,870 |
|
$ |
7,361 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
1,983 |
|
3,008 |
|
3,977 |
|
5,775 |
|
||||
GROSS MARGIN |
|
448 |
|
879 |
|
893 |
|
1,586 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
OPERATING EXPENSES AND INCOME |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
287 |
|
370 |
|
587 |
|
721 |
|
||||
Research, development and engineering expenses |
|
79 |
|
104 |
|
164 |
|
207 |
|
||||
Equity, royalty and interest income from investees (Note 5) |
|
57 |
|
69 |
|
90 |
|
136 |
|
||||
Restructuring charges (Note 6) |
|
7 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
||||
Other operating (expense) income, net |
|
(11 |
) |
(6 |
) |
(9 |
) |
(7 |
) |
||||
OPERATING INCOME |
|
121 |
|
468 |
|
150 |
|
787 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Interest income |
|
1 |
|
4 |
|
3 |
|
10 |
|
||||
Interest expense |
|
10 |
|
12 |
|
17 |
|
23 |
|
||||
Other (expense) income, net |
|
(13 |
) |
(3 |
) |
(16 |
) |
(13 |
) |
||||
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES |
|
99 |
|
457 |
|
120 |
|
761 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Income tax expense |
|
29 |
|
147 |
|
36 |
|
249 |
|
||||
NET INCOME |
|
70 |
|
310 |
|
84 |
|
512 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
14 |
|
17 |
|
21 |
|
29 |
|
||||
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO CUMMINS INC. |
|
$ |
56 |
|
293 |
|
$ |
63 |
|
$ |
483 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE ATTRIBUTABLE TO CUMMINS INC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Basic |
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
$ |
1.50 |
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
$ |
2.47 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
$ |
1.49 |
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
$ |
2.46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Basic |
|
197.1 |
|
195.2 |
|
197.0 |
|
195.1 |
|
||||
Dilutive effect of stock compensation awards |
|
0.3 |
|
1.4 |
|
0.2 |
|
1.4 |
|
||||
Diluted |
|
197.4 |
|
196.6 |
|
197.2 |
|
196.5 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
CASH DIVIDENDS DECLARED PER COMMON SHARE |
|
$ |
0.175 |
|
$ |
0.125 |
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
(a) Includes sales to nonconsolidated equity investees of $422 million and $851 million and $570 million and $1,082 million for the three and six months ended June 28, 2009 and June 29, 2008, respectively.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
CUMMINS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
|
|
June 28, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
In millions (except par value) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
534 |
|
$ |
426 |
|
Marketable securities |
|
17 |
|
77 |
|
||
Accounts and notes receivable, net |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Trade and other |
|
1,533 |
|
1,551 |
|
||
Nonconsolidated equity investees |
|
192 |
|
231 |
|
||
Inventories (Note 7) |
|
1,535 |
|
1,783 |
|
||
Deferred income taxes |
|
364 |
|
347 |
|
||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
198 |
|
298 |
|
||
Total current assets |
|
4,373 |
|
4,713 |
|
||
Long-term assets |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Property, plant and equipment |
|
4,681 |
|
4,539 |
|
||
Accumulated depreciation |
|
(2,821 |
) |
(2,698 |
) |
||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
1,860 |
|
1,841 |
|
||
Investments and advances related to equity method investees |
|
527 |
|
588 |
|
||
Goodwill |
|
362 |
|
362 |
|
||
Other intangible assets, net |
|
241 |
|
223 |
|
||
Deferred income taxes |
|
499 |
|
491 |
|
||
Other assets |
|
259 |
|
301 |
|
||
Total assets |
|
$ |
8,121 |
|
$ |
8,519 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Current portion of long-term debt and loans payable |
|
$ |
63 |
|
$ |
69 |
|
Accounts payable (principally trade) |
|
773 |
|
1,009 |
|
||
Current portion of accrued product warranty (Note 8) |
|
373 |
|
434 |
|
||
Accrued compensation, benefits and retirement costs |
|
283 |
|
364 |
|
||
Other accrued expenses |
|
622 |
|
763 |
|
||
Total current liabilities |
|
2,114 |
|
2,639 |
|
||
Long-term liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Long-term debt |
|
617 |
|
629 |
|
||
Pensions |
|
561 |
|
574 |
|
||
Postretirement benefits other than pensions |
|
442 |
|
452 |
|
||
Other liabilities and deferred revenue |
|
792 |
|
745 |
|
||
Total liabilities |
|
4,526 |
|
5,039 |
|
||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 9) |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cummins Inc. shareholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Common stock, $2.50 par value, 500 shares authorized, 222.1 and 221.7 shares issued |
|
1,796 |
|
1,793 |
|
||
Retained earnings |
|
3,280 |
|
3,288 |
|
||
Treasury stock, at cost, 20.3 and 20.4 shares |
|
(714 |
) |
(715 |
) |
||
Common stock held by employee benefits trust, at cost, 4.8 and 5.1 shares |
|
(58 |
) |
(61 |
) |
||
Unearned compensation |
|
(1 |
) |
(5 |
) |
||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Defined benefit postretirement plans |
|
(794 |
) |
(798 |
) |
||
Other |
|
(137 |
) |
(268 |
) |
||
Total accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
(931 |
) |
(1,066 |
) |
||
Total Cummins Inc. shareholders equity |
|
3,372 |
|
3,234 |
|
||
Noncontrolling interests |
|
223 |
|
246 |
|
||
Total equity |
|
3,595 |
|
3,480 |
|
||
Total liabilities and equity |
|
$ |
8,121 |
|
$ |
8,519 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
CUMMINS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
|
|
Six months ended |
|
||||
|
|
June 28, |
|
June 29, |
|
||
In millions |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net income |
|
$ |
84 |
|
$ |
512 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Restructuring charges, net of cash payments (Note 6) |
|
20 |
|
|
|
||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
154 |
|
158 |
|
||
Deferred income taxes |
|
20 |
|
14 |
|
||
Equity in income of investees, net of dividends |
|
60 |
|
(62 |
) |
||
Pension expense, net of pension contributions (Note 4) |
|
(15 |
) |
(3 |
) |
||
Other post-retirement benefits expense, net of cash payments (Note 4) |
|
(16 |
) |
(5 |
) |
||
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
12 |
|
17 |
|
||
Excess tax deficiencies (benefits) on stock-based awards |
|
2 |
|
(12 |
) |
||
Translation and hedging activities |
|
51 |
|
8 |
|
||
Changes in current assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions and dispositions: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Accounts and notes receivable |
|
86 |
|
(316 |
) |
||
Inventories |
|
282 |
|
(202 |
) |
||
Other current assets |
|
22 |
|
(16 |
) |
||
Accounts payable |
|
(253 |
) |
172 |
|
||
Accrued expenses |
|
(242 |
) |
102 |
|
||
Changes in long-term liabilities |
|
73 |
|
47 |
|
||
Other, net |
|
(19 |
) |
(8 |
) |
||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
321 |
|
406 |
|
||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Capital expenditures |
|
(139 |
) |
(201 |
) |
||
Investments in internal use software |
|
(19 |
) |
(36 |
) |
||
Proceeds from disposals of property, plant and equipment |
|
7 |
|
10 |
|
||
Investments in and advances (to) from equity investees |
|
1 |
|
(41 |
) |
||
Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired |
|
(2 |
) |
(76 |
) |
||
Investments in marketable securitiesacquisitions |
|
(69 |
) |
(158 |
) |
||
Investments in marketable securitiesliquidations |
|
133 |
|
159 |
|
||
Cash flows from derivatives not designated as hedges |
|
(21 |
) |
(18 |
) |
||
Other, net |
|
|
|
5 |
|
||
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
(109 |
) |
(356 |
) |
||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Proceeds from borrowings |
|
10 |
|
77 |
|
||
Payments on borrowings and capital lease obligations |
|
(44 |
) |
(101 |
) |
||
Net borrowings under short-term credit agreements |
|
(5 |
) |
1 |
|
||
Distributions to noncontrolling interests |
|
(10 |
) |
(6 |
) |
||
Dividend payments on common stock |
|
(71 |
) |
(51 |
) |
||
Repurchases of common stock |
|
|
|
(45 |
) |
||
Excess tax (deficiencies) benefits on stock-based awards |
|
(2 |
) |
12 |
|
||
Other, net |
|
3 |
|
2 |
|
||
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
(119 |
) |
(111 |
) |
||
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
15 |
|
6 |
|
||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
108 |
|
(55 |
) |
||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
|
426 |
|
577 |
|
||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD |
|
$ |
534 |
|
$ |
522 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
CUMMINS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
|
Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
Common |
|
paid-in |
|
Retained |
|
Comprehensive |
|
Treasury |
|
Held in |
|
Unearned |
|
Shareholders |
|
Noncontrolling |
|
Total |
|
||||||||||
In millions |
|
Stock |
|
Capital |
|
Earnings |
|
Loss |
|
Stock |
|
Trust |
|
Compensation |
|
Equity |
|
Interests |
|
Equity |
|
||||||||||
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
551 |
|
$ |
1,168 |
|
$ |
2,660 |
|
$ |
(286 |
) |
$ |
(593 |
) |
$ |
(79 |
) |
$ |
(11 |
) |
$ |
3,410 |
|
$ |
292 |
|
$ |
3,702 |
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
483 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
483 |
|
29 |
|
512 |
|
||||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Unrealized loss on marketable securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
(2 |
) |
(4 |
) |
||||||||||
Unrealized gain on derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
(11 |
) |
(17 |
) |
||||||||||
Change in pensions and other postretirement defined benefit plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
505 |
|
16 |
|
521 |
|
||||||||||
Effect of changing pension plan measurement date pursuant to SFAS No. 158 |
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
||||||||||
Issuance of shares |
|
3 |
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
4 |
|
6 |
|
||||||||||
Acquisition of shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
(45 |
) |
||||||||||
Cash dividends on common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
(51 |
) |
||||||||||
Distribution to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
(8 |
) |
||||||||||
Stock option exercises |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
||||||||||
Other shareholder transactions |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
18 |
|
2 |
|
20 |
|
||||||||||
BALANCE AT JUNE 29, 2008 |
|
$ |
554 |
|
$ |
1,180 |
|
$ |
3,087 |
|
$ |
(266 |
) |
$ |
(634 |
) |
$ |
(79 |
) |
$ |
(7 |
) |
$ |
3,835 |
|
$ |
306 |
|
$ |
4,141 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
554 |
|
$ |
1,239 |
|
$ |
3,288 |
|
$ |
(1,066 |
) |
$ |
(715 |
) |
$ |
(61 |
) |
$ |
(5 |
) |
$ |
3,234 |
|
$ |
246 |
|
$ |
3,480 |
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63 |
|
21 |
|
84 |
|
||||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Unrealized gain on derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87 |
|
6 |
|
93 |
|
||||||||||
Change in pensions and other postretirement defined benefit plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
198 |
|
27 |
|
225 |
|
||||||||||
Issuance of shares |
|
1 |
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
||||||||||
Cash dividends on common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
(71 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(71 |
) |
|
|
(71 |
) |
||||||||||
Distribution to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
(15 |
) |
||||||||||
Stock option exercises |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Conversion to capital lease (Note 12) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35 |
) |
(35 |
) |
||||||||||
Other shareholder transactions |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
4 |
|
8 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
||||||||||
BALANCE AT JUNE 28, 2009 |
|
$ |
555 |
|
$ |
1,241 |
|
$ |
3,280 |
|
$ |
(931 |
)(1) |
$ |
(714 |
) |
$ |
(58 |
) |
$ |
(1 |
) |
$ |
3,372 |
|
$ |
223 |
|
$ |
3,595 |
|
(1) Comprised of defined benefit postretirement plans of $(794) million, foreign currency translation adjustments of $(116) million, unrealized gain on marketable securities of $2 million and unrealized loss on derivatives of $(23) million.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
CUMMINS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTE 1. NATURE OF OPERATIONS
Cummins Inc. (Cummins, the Company, the registrant, we, our, or us) is a leading global power provider that designs, manufactures, distributes and services diesel and natural gas engines, electric power generation systems and engine-related component products, including filtration and emissions solutions, turbochargers, fuel systems, controls and air handling systems. We were founded in 1919 as one of the first manufacturers of diesel engines and are headquartered in Columbus, Indiana. We sell our products to Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs), distributors and other customers worldwide. We serve our customers through a network of more than 500 company-owned and independent distributor locations and approximately 5,200 dealer locations in more than 190 countries and territories.
NOTE 2. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements reflect all adjustments which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair statement of the results of operations, financial position and cash flows. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) for interim financial information. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted as permitted by such rules and regulations. Certain reclassifications have been made to prior period amounts to conform to the presentation of the current period condensed financial statements.
Our reporting period ends on the Sunday closest to the last day of the quarterly calendar period. The second quarters of 2009 and 2008 ended on June 28, and June 29, respectively. The interim periods for both 2009 and 2008 contain 13 weeks. Our fiscal year ends on December 31, regardless of the day of the week on which December 31 falls.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. Significant estimates and assumptions in these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements require the exercise of judgment and are used for, but not limited to, allowance for doubtful accounts, estimates of future cash flows and other assumptions associated with goodwill and long-lived asset impairment tests, useful lives for depreciation and amortization, warranty programs, determination of discount and other rate assumptions for pension and other postretirement benefit expenses, income taxes and deferred tax valuation allowances and contingencies. Due to the inherent uncertainty involved in making estimates, actual results reported in future periods may be different from these estimates.
The weighted-average diluted common shares outstanding exclude the anti-dilutive effect of certain stock options since such options had an exercise price in excess of the monthly average market value of our common stock. The options excluded from diluted earnings per share for the three and six month periods ended June 28, 2009, and June 29, 2008, were as follows:
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Six months ended |
|
||||
|
|
June 28, 2009 |
|
June 29, 2008 |
|
June 28, 2009 |
|
June 29, 2008 |
|
Options excluded |
|
99,167 |
|
4,317 |
|
75,671 |
|
7,286 |
|
Comprehensive income is comprised of net income, as well as adjustments for foreign currency translation, marketable securities, derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges and pension and other postretirement defined benefits. Total comprehensive income attributable to Cummins Inc. for the three and six month periods ended June 28, 2009, was $177 million and $198 million, respectively. Total comprehensive income attributable to Cummins Inc. for the three and six month periods ended June 29, 2008, was $269 million and $505 million, respectively.
Total comprehensive income attributable to the noncontrolling interests for the three and six month periods ended June 28, 2009, was $25 million and $27 million, respectively. Total comprehensive income attributable to the noncontrolling interests for the three and six month periods ended Jun 29, 2008, was $7 million and $16 million, respectively.
7
Consolidated comprehensive income for the three and six month periods ended June 28, 2009, was $202 million and $225 million, respectively. Consolidated comprehensive income for the three and six month periods ended June 29, 2008, was $276 million and $521 million, respectively.
You should read these interim condensed financial statements in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. Our interim period financial results for the three and six month interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for any other interim period or for the entire year. The year-end Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet data was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by GAAP.
NOTE 3. RECENTLY ADOPTED AND RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
Accounting Pronouncements Recently Adopted
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements (SFAS 160), which is effective for interim and annual fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2008. This standard amends Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, Consolidated Financial Statements (ARB 51) and establishes accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the accounting for future ownership changes with respect to those subsidiaries. This standard defines a noncontrolling interest, previously called a minority interest, as the portion of equity in a subsidiary not attributable, directly or indirectly, to a parent. This standard requires, among other items, that a noncontrolling interest be included in the consolidated balance sheet within equity separate from the parents equity; consolidated net income to be reported at amounts inclusive of both the parents and noncontrolling interests shares and, separately, the amounts of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and noncontrolling interest all on the consolidated statements of income; and if a subsidiary is deconsolidated, any retained noncontrolling equity investment in the former subsidiary be measured at fair value and a gain or loss be recognized in net income based on such fair value. We adopted this standard effective January 1, 2009, and applied it retrospectively. As a result, we reclassified noncontrolling interests of $246 million from the mezzanine section to equity in the December 31, 2008, balance sheet. Certain reclassifications have been made to prior period amounts to conform to the presentation of the current period under this standard.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (SFAS 161), which is effective for interim and annual fiscal periods beginning after November 15, 2008. This standard amends SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (SFAS 133) and requires enhanced disclosures about a companys derivative and hedging activities. We adopted this standard effective January 1, 2009, and applied it prospectively. The new disclosures required by this standard are included in Note 11.
In April 2009, the FASB issued three new FASB Staff Positions (FSPs) all of which impact the accounting and disclosure related to certain financial instruments. FSP FAS 157-4, Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly (FSP FAS 157-4) provides additional guidance for estimating fair value in accordance with SFAS 157 when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability have significantly decreased. It also includes guidance on identifying circumstances that indicate a transaction is not orderly. FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, Recognition of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment (FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2) amends the other-than-temporary impairment guidance for debt securities to make the guidance more operational and to improve the presentation and disclosure of other-than-temporary impairments on debt and equity securities in the financial statements. FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments (FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1) amends FASB Statement No. 107 to require disclosures about the fair value of financial instruments on an interim basis in addition to the annual disclosure requirements. The new disclosures required by this FSP are included in Note 11. These FSPs were required to be adopted for interim periods ending after June 15, 2009. These staff positions did not have a material impact on our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, Subsequent Events (SFAS 165), which is effective for interim and annual fiscal periods ending after June 15, 2009. This standard establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. This standard sets forth the period after the balance sheet date during which we should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements, the circumstances under which we should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in our financial
8
statements and the disclosures that we should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. In preparing our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, we evaluated subsequent events through July 30, 2009, which is the date our quarterly report was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commision.
Accounting Pronouncements Issued But Not Yet Effective
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140 (SFAS 166), which is effective for interim and annual fiscal periods beginning after November 15, 2009. This standard removes the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity from FASB Statement No. 140 and removes the exception from applying FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) (revised December 2003) Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities to variable interest entities that are qualifying special-purpose entities (FIN 46(R)). This standard modifies the financial-components approach used in SFAS 140 and limits the circumstances in which a financial asset, or portion of a financial asset, should be derecognized. This standard also requires enhanced disclosure regarding transfers of financial interests and a transferors continuing involvement with transferred assets. We are currently evaluating the impact of this standard on our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) (SFAS 167), which is effective for interim and annual fiscal periods beginning after November 15, 2009. This standard requires entities to analyze whether their variable interests give it a controlling financial interest of a variable interest entity (VIE) and outlines what defines a primary beneficiary. This statement amends FIN 46(R) by: (a) changing certain guidance for determining whether an entity is a VIE; (b) eliminating the quantitative approach previously required for determining the primary beneficiary; and (c) requiring entities to continuously analyze whether they are the primary beneficiary of a VIE among other amendments. This statement also requires enhanced disclosures regarding an entitys involvement in a VIE. It is possible that application of this revised guidance will change our assessment of which entities in which we are involved are VIEs or whether or not we are the primary beneficiary. We are currently evaluating the impact of this standard on our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
In July 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principlesa replacement of FASB Statement No. 162 (SFAS 168), which is effective for interim and annual fiscal periods ending after September 15, 2009. This standard replaces SFAS 162, and the codification from this standard will supersede all then-existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards to become the sole source of authoritative U.S. GAAP. The adoption of this standard will have no impact on our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
NOTE 4. PENSION AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS
We sponsor funded and unfunded domestic and foreign defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans. Cash contributions to these plans were as follows:
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Six months ended |
|
||||||||
|
|
June 28, |
|
June 29, |
|
June 28, |
|
June 29, |
|
||||
In millions |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
||||
Defined benefit pension and postretirement plans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Voluntary |
|
$ |
45 |
|
$ |
12 |
|
$ |
45 |
|
$ |
24 |
|
Mandatory |
|
20 |
|
14 |
|
41 |
|
30 |
|
||||
Total defined benefit plans |
|
$ |
65 |
|
$ |
26 |
|
$ |
86 |
|
$ |
54 |
|
Defined contribution pension plans |
|
$ |
7 |
|
$ |
8 |
|
$ |
23 |
|
$ |
18 |
|
We presently anticipate contributing $125 million to $135 million to our defined benefit pension plans in 2009 and paying approximately $53 million in claims and premiums for other postretirement benefits. The $125 million to $135 million of contributions for the full year include voluntary contributions of $100 million to $105 million. These contributions and payments include payments from Company funds either to increase pension assets or to make direct payments to plan participants.
9
The components of net periodic pension and other postretirement benefit cost under our plans consisted of the following:
|
|
Pension |
|
Other |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
U.S. Plans |
|
Non-U.S. Plans |
|
Benefits |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
Three months ended |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
June 28, |
|
June 29, |
|
June 28, |
|
June 29, |
|
June 28, |
|
June 29, |
|
||||||
In millions |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
||||||
Service cost |
|
$ |
12 |
|
$ |
12 |
|
$ |
4 |
|
$ |
7 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Interest cost |
|
28 |
|
29 |
|
14 |
|
16 |
|
8 |
|
8 |
|
||||||
Expected return on plan assets |
|
(35 |
) |
(38 |
) |
(14 |
) |
(19 |
) |
|
|
|
|
||||||
Amortization of prior service (credit) cost |
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
(2 |
) |
(2 |
) |
||||||
Recognized net actuarial loss (gain) |
|
7 |
|
5 |
|
5 |
|
5 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
||||||
Other |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
12 |
|
$ |
8 |
|
$ |
10 |
|
$ |
10 |
|
$ |
6 |
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
|
Pension |
|
Other |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
U.S. Plans |
|
Non-U.S. Plans |
|
Benefits |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
Six months ended |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
June 28, |
|
June 29, |
|
June 28, |
|
June 29, |
|
June 28, |
|
June 29, |
|
||||||
In millions |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
||||||
Service cost |
|
$ |
23 |
|
$ |
24 |
|
$ |
8 |
|
$ |
14 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Interest cost |
|
57 |
|
58 |
|
27 |
|
32 |
|
15 |
|
16 |
|
||||||
Expected return on plan assets |
|
(70 |
) |
(76 |
) |
(28 |
) |
(38 |
) |
|
|
|
|
||||||
Amortization of prior service (credit) cost |
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
2 |
|
(4 |
) |
(5 |
) |
||||||
Recognized net actuarial loss (gain) |
|
15 |
|
10 |
|
10 |
|
10 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
||||||
Other |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
25 |
|
$ |
16 |
|
$ |
19 |
|
$ |
20 |
|
$ |
11 |
|
$ |
10 |
|
NOTE 5. EQUITY, ROYALTY AND INTEREST INCOME FROM INVESTEES
Equity, royalty and interest income from investees included in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the interim reporting periods was as follows:
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Six months ended |
|
||||||||
|
|
June 28, |
|
June 29, |
|
June 28, |
|
June 29, |
|
||||
In millions |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
||||
Distribution Entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
North American distributors |
|
$ |
23 |
|
$ |
24 |
|
$ |
49 |
|
$ |
46 |
|
All other distributors |
|
4 |
|
3 |
|
7 |
|
4 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Manufacturing Entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Chongqing Cummins Engine Company, Ltd |
|
12 |
|
7 |
|
20 |
|
14 |
|
||||
Dongfeng Cummins Engine Company, Ltd |
|
7 |
|
20 |
|
7 |
|
34 |
|
||||
Shanghai Fleetguard Filter Co. Ltd. |
|
2 |
|
2 |
|
3 |
|
5 |
|
||||
Tata Cummins Ltd. |
|
2 |
|
2 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
||||
Cummins MerCruiser Diesel Marine LLC. |
|
(2 |
) |
2 |
|
(3 |
) |
6 |
|
||||
All other manufacturers |
|
5 |
|
3 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
||||
Cummins share of net income |
|
53 |
|
63 |
|
83 |
|
125 |
|
||||
Royalty and interest income |
|
4 |
|
6 |
|
7 |
|
11 |
|
||||
Equity, royalty and interest income from investees |
|
$ |
57 |
|
$ |
69 |
|
$ |
90 |
|
$ |
136 |
|
NOTE 6. RESTRUCTURING CHARGES
2009 Restructuring Actions
In 2009, we executed restructuring actions in response to a reduction in orders in most of our U.S. and foreign markets due to the continuing deterioration in the global economy. We reduced our global workforce by
10
approximately 850 professional employees. In addition, we took numerous employee actions at many of our manufacturing locations, including approximately 2,600 hourly employees, significant downsizing at numerous facilities and complete closure of several facilities and branch distributor locations. Employee termination and severance costs were recorded based on approved plans developed by the businesses and corporate management which specified positions to be eliminated, benefits to be paid under existing severance plans, union contracts or statutory requirements and the expected timetable for completion of the plan. Estimates of restructuring were made based on information available at the time charges were recorded. Due to the inherent uncertainty involved, actual amounts paid for such activities may differ from amounts initially recorded and we may need to revise previous estimates. Total workforce reductions as of June 28, 2009, were substantially completed.
In response to closures and downsizing noted above, we incurred $2 million of restructuring expenses for lease terminations and $4 million of restructuring expenses for asset impairments. During 2009 we recorded a total pre-tax restructuring charge of $73 million, net of the $1 million favorable change in estimate related to 2008 actions, in Restructuring charges in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income related to the 2009 actions. These restructuring actions included:
In millions |
|
2009 |
|
Estimated
Completion |
|
|
Workforce reductions |
|
$ |
68 |
|
September 2009 |
|
Exit activities |
|
6 |
|
September 2009 |
|
|
The following table summarizes the balance of accrued restructuring charges by expense type and the changes in the accrued amounts for the applicable periods. The restructuring related accruals were recorded in Other accrued expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
In millions |
|
Severance |
|
Exit |
|
Total |
|
|||
2009 Restructuring charges |
|
$ |
68 |
|
$ |
6 |
|
$ |
74 |
|
Cash payments for 2009 actions |
|
(51 |
) |
(1 |
) |
(52 |
) |
|||
Noncash items |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
(4 |
) |
|||
Balance at June 28, 2009 |
|
$ |
17 |
|
$ |
1 |
|
$ |
18 |
|
We do not include restructuring charges in our operating segment results. The pretax impact of allocating restructuring charges to the segment results would have been as follows:
In millions |
|
2009 Charges |
|
|
Engine |
|
$ |
33 |
|
Power Generation |
|
6 |
|
|
Components |
|
26 |
|
|
Distribution |
|
4 |
|
|
Non-segment |
|
4 |
|
|
Total restructuring charges |
|
$ |
73 |
|
2008 Restructuring Actions
In 2008 we executed restructuring actions in response to the continued deterioration in our U.S. businesses and most key markets around the world in the second half of 2008, as well as a reduction in orders in most U.S. and foreign markets for 2009. In 2008 we announced reductions of our global workforce by approximately 650 professional employees. In addition, we took numerous employee actions at many of our manufacturing locations, including approximately 800 hourly employees. Total workforce reductions as of June 28, 2009, were substantially completed.
The charges recorded during the year ended December 31, 2008, included severance costs related to both voluntary and involuntary terminations. During 2008, we incurred a pretax charge related to the professional and hourly
11
restructuring initiatives of $37 million. The following table summarizes the balance of accrued restructuring charges and the changes in the accrued amounts for the applicable periods. The restructuring related accruals were recorded in Other accrued expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
In millions |
|
Severance Costs |
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
34 |
|
Cash payments for 2008 actions |
|
(26 |
) |
|
Change in estimate |
|
(1 |
) |
|
Balance at June 28, 2009 |
|
$ |
7 |
|
NOTE 7. INVENTORIES
Inventories included the following:
|
|
June 28, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
In millions |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
||
Finished products |
|
$ |
858 |
|
$ |
860 |
|
Work-in-process and raw materials |
|
774 |
|
1,021 |
|
||
Inventories at FIFO cost |
|
1,632 |
|
1,881 |
|
||
Excess of FIFO over LIFO |
|
(97 |
) |
(98 |
) |
||
Total inventories |
|
$ |
1,535 |
|
$ |
1,783 |
|
NOTE 8. PRODUCT WARRANTY LIABILITY
We charge the estimated costs of warranty programs, other than product recalls, to income at the time products are shipped to customers. We use historical claims experience to develop the estimated liability. We review product recall programs on a quarterly basis and, if necessary, record a liability when we commit to an action. We also sell extended warranty coverage on several engines. The following is a tabular reconciliation of the product warranty liability, including the deferred revenue related to our extended warranty coverage:
|
|
Six months ended |
|
||||
|
|
June 28, |
|
June 29, |
|
||
In millions |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
||
Balance, beginning of period |
|
$ |
962 |
|
$ |
749 |
|
Provision for warranties issued |
|
157 |
|
218 |
|
||
Deferred revenue on extended warranty contracts sold |
|
53 |
|
43 |
|
||
Payments |
|
(242 |
) |
(175 |
) |
||
Amortization of deferred revenue on extended warranty contracts |
|
(36 |
) |
(31 |
) |
||
Changes in estimates for pre-existing warranties |
|
53 |
|
50 |
|
||
Foreign currency translation |
|
11 |
|
|
|
||
Balance, end of period |
|
$ |
958 |
|
$ |
854 |
|
The amount of deferred revenue related to extended coverage programs as of June 28, 2009, was $243 million. As of June 28, 2009, we had $12 million of receivables related to estimated supplier recoveries of which $6 million was included in Trade and other receivables and $6 million was included in Other assets in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
During 2008 and 2009, actual cost trends for certain midrange engine products, including product launched in 2007 and for which warranty periods can extend to five years, indicated higher per claim repair cost than the product on which the initial accrual rate was developed. These products include more electronic parts than historical models, contributing to the higher cost per claim. In addition, certain products introduced in 2003 and sold prior to 2007 for which the warranty period extended five years also demonstrated higher cost per claim than that of predecessor products. We increased our liability in 2008 as these experience trends became evident.
NOTE 9. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
We are subject to numerous lawsuits and claims arising out of the ordinary course of our business, including actions related to product liability; personal injury; the use and performance of our products; warranty matters; patent, trademark or other intellectual property infringement; contractual liability; the conduct of our business; tax reporting in foreign jurisdictions; distributor termination; workplace safety; and environmental matters. We also have been identified as a potentially responsible party at multiple waste disposal sites under federal and related state environmental statutes and regulations and may have joint and several liability for any investigation and remediation costs incurred with respect to such sites. Some of these lawsuits, claims and proceedings involve substantial amounts. We have denied liability with respect to many of these lawsuits, claims and proceedings and are vigorously defending such lawsuits, claims and proceedings. We carry various forms of commercial, property and
12
casualty, product liability and other forms of insurance; however, such insurance may not be applicable or adequate to cover the costs associated with a judgment against us with respect to these lawsuits, claims and proceedings. We do not believe that these lawsuits are material individually or in the aggregate. While we believe we have also established adequate accruals for our expected future liability with respect to pending lawsuits, claims and proceedings, where the nature and extent of any such liability can be reasonably estimated based upon then presently available information, there can be no assurance that the final resolution of any existing or future lawsuits, claims or proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operation, financial condition or cash flows.
In June 2008, four Cummins sites in Southern Indiana, including our Technical Center, experienced extensive damage caused by flood water from an unusually high amount of rainfall. We have been in ongoing discussions with our insurance carriers regarding our claim. In May 2009, our insurance carriers filed a law suit seeking a declaratory judgment that a lower policy sublimit applies to the Technical Center based upon an allegation that the site is located in a flood plain. In addition, they allege that certain other damages and losses claimed by Cummins are not covered by insurance. Cummins has also filed suit seeking a declaratory judgment that all losses suffered by Cummins are covered under the insurance policies, as well as a claim that the insurance companies have acted in bad faith. We have finalized the documentation of Cummins $199 million claim ($116 million expense and $83 million capital), which does not include an additional claim amount related to business interruption. We remain confident that we will recover a majority of the amounts due to us under the insurance policies. We have incurred approximately $88 million in expense and $42 million in capital of our $199 million claim through June 28, 2009. We recorded flood damage expenses of $9 million and $3 million for the three and six months ended June 28, 2009. These expenses were included in Other operating (expense) income in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.
U.S. Distributor Commitments
We had an operating agreement with a financial institution that provided financing to certain independent Cummins and Onan distributors in the U.S., and to certain distributors in which we own an equity interest. Under this agreement, if any distributor defaulted under its financing arrangement with the financial institution, and the maturity of amounts owed under the agreement were accelerated, then we were required to purchase from the financial institution, at amounts approximating fair market value, certain property, inventory and rental generator sets manufactured by Cummins that are secured by the distributors financing agreement.
The distributor agreement with the financial institution was refinanced and Cummins did not make any new commitments, thereby relieving Cummins of responsibility to purchase any assets from the financial institution in event of default by the distributors.
Our licensing agreements with independent and partially owned distributors generally have a three-year term and are restricted to specified territories. Our distributors develop and maintain a network of dealers with which we have no direct relationship. The distributors are permitted to sell other, noncompetitive products only with our consent. We license all of our distributors to use our name and logo in connection with the sale and service of our products, with no right to assign or sublicense the marks, except to authorized dealers, without our consent. Products are sold to the distributors at standard domestic or international distributor net prices, as applicable. Net prices are wholesale prices we establish to permit our distributors an adequate margin on their sales. Subject to local laws, we can refuse to renew these agreements at will and we may terminate them upon 90-day notice for inadequate sales, change in principal ownership and certain other reasons. Distributors also have the right to terminate the agreements upon 60-day notice without cause, or 30-day notice for cause. Upon termination or failure to renew, we are required to purchase the distributors current inventory, signage and special tools, and may, at our option purchase other assets of the distributor, but are under no obligation to do so.
Residual Value Guarantees
We have various residual value guarantees on equipment leased under operating leases. The total amount of these residual value guarantees at June 28, 2009, was $8 million.
13
Other Guarantees and Commitments
In addition to the guarantees discussed above, from time to time we enter into other guarantee arrangements, including guarantees of non-U.S. distributor financing and other miscellaneous guarantees of third-party obligations. As of June 28, 2009, the maximum potential loss related to these other guarantees is $64 million ($62 million of which relates to the Beijing Foton discussion below).
We have arrangements with certain suppliers that require us to purchase minimum volumes or be subject to monetary penalties. The penalty amounts are less than our purchase commitments and essentially allow the supplier to recover their tooling costs in most instances. As of June 28, 2009, if we were to stop purchasing from each of these suppliers, the amount of the penalty would be approximately $87 million, of which $73 million relates to a contract with an engine parts supplier that extends to 2013. This arrangement enables us to secure critical components. We do not anticipate paying any penalties under these contracts.
In July 2008, Beijing Foton Cummins Engine Company, a 50 percent owned entity accounted for under the equity method, entered into a line of credit agreement with a borrowing capacity of up to $176 million (at current exchange rates). The line will be used primarily to fund equipment purchases for a new manufacturing plant. As a part of this transaction, we guaranteed 50 percent of any outstanding borrowings up to a maximum guarantee of $88 million (at current exchange rates). As of June 28, 2009, outstanding borrowings under this agreement were $124 million and our guarantee was $62 million (at current exchange rates). We recorded a liability for the fair value of this guarantee in accordance with FASB Interpretation No. 45, Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Othersan interpretation of FASB Statements No. 5, 57, and 107 and rescission of FASB Interpretation No. 34. The amount of the liability was less than $1 million. The offset to this liability was an increase in our investment in the joint venture.
We have a standby commitment with Irwin Financial Corporation (Irwin) to purchase up to $25 million of its common shares in connection with a potential rights offering being planned by Irwin. Our commitment is subject to the satisfaction of several conditions. William I. Miller, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Irwin, is currently a member of the board of directors of Cummins and has agreed to resign from that position if the Company makes any investment in Irwin. The decision by us to enter into our commitment or to make any investment in Irwin has been and will continue to be made by our Board of Directors without the participation of Mr. Miller.
Indemnifications
Periodically, we enter into various contractual arrangements where we agree to indemnify a third-party against certain types of losses. Common types of indemnifications include:
· product liability and license, patent or trademark indemnifications,
· asset sale agreements where we agree to indemnify the purchaser against future environmental exposures related to the asset sold and
· any contractual agreement where we agree to indemnify the counter-party for losses suffered as a result of a misrepresentation in the contract.
We regularly evaluate the probability of having to incur costs associated with these indemnifications and accrue for expected losses that are probable. Because the indemnifications are not related to specified known liabilities and due to their uncertain nature, we are unable to estimate the maximum amount of the potential loss associated with these indemnifications.
Joint Venture Commitments
As of June 28, 2009, we have committed to invest $12 million into existing joint ventures and joint ventures that will be formed in 2009. It is expected that $10 million will be funded in 2009.
NOTE 10. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The majority of the assets and liabilities we carry at fair value are available-for-sale (AFS) securities and derivatives. AFS securities are derived from level 1 or level 2 inputs. The predominance of market inputs are actively quoted and can be validated through external sources, including brokers, market transactions and third-party pricing services.
14
The fair value measurement of derivatives results primarily from level 2 inputs. Many of our derivative contracts are valued utilizing publicly available pricing data of contracts with similar terms. In other cases, the contracts are valued using current spot market data adjusted for the appropriate current forward curves provided by external financial institutions. We participate in commodity swap contracts, currency forward contracts, and interest rate swaps. When material, we adjust the values of our derivative contracts for counter-party or our credit risk.
The following table summarizes our financial instruments recorded at fair value in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 28, 2009:
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using |
|
||||||||||
In millions |
|
Quoted
prices in active |
|
Significant
other |
|
Significant |
|
Total |
|
||||
Available-for-sale securities |
|
$ |
11 |
|
$ |
6 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
17 |
|
Derivative assets |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
||||
Derivative liabilities |
|
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
(32 |
) |
||||
Total |
|
$ |
11 |
|
$ |
23 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
34 |
|
Fair Value of Other Financial Instruments
Based on borrowing rates currently available to us for bank loans with similar terms and average maturities, considering our risk premium, the fair value of total debt, including current maturities, at June 28, 2009, was approximately $550 million. The carrying value at that date was $680 million. At December 31, 2008, the fair and carrying values of total debt, including current maturities, were $567 million and $698 million, respectively. The carrying values of all other receivables and liabilities approximated fair values.
NOTE 11. DERIVATIVES
We are exposed to financial risk resulting from volatility in foreign exchange rates, commodity prices and interest rates. This risk is closely monitored and managed through the use of financial derivative instruments including foreign currency forward contracts, commodity forward contracts and interest rate swaps. As stated in our internal policies and procedures, financial derivatives are used expressly for hedging purposes, and under no circumstances are they used for speculative purposes. When material, we adjust the value of our derivative contracts for counter-party or our credit risk. The results and status of our hedging transactions are reported to senior management on a monthly and quarterly basis.
Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk
As a result of our international business presence, we are exposed to foreign currency exchange risks. We transact business in foreign currencies and, as a result, our income experiences some volatility related to movements in foreign currency exchange rates. To help manage our exposure to exchange rate volatility, we use foreign exchange forward contracts on a regular basis to hedge forecasted intercompany and third-party sales and purchases denominated in non-functional currencies. Our internal policy allows for managing anticipated foreign currency cash flows for up to one year. These foreign currency forward contracts are designated and qualify as foreign currency cash flow hedges under SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (SFAS 133). The effective portion of the unrealized gain or loss on the forward contract is deferred and reported as a component of Accumulated other comprehensive loss (AOCL). When the hedged forecasted transaction (sale or purchase) occurs, the unrealized gain or loss is reclassified into income in the same line item associated with the hedged transaction in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction affects income. The ineffective portion of the hedge, unrealized gain or loss, if any, is recognized in current income during the period of change. As of June 28, 2009, we expect to reclassify an unrealized net gain of $5 million from AOCL to income over the next year. For the six month periods ended June 28, 2009, and June 29, 2008, there were no circumstances that would have resulted in the discontinuance of a foreign currency cash flow hedge.
To minimize the income volatility resulting from the remeasurement of net monetary assets and payables denominated in a currency other than the functional currency, we enter into foreign currency forward contracts, which are considered economic hedges. The objective is to offset the gain or loss from remeasurement with the gain or loss from the fair market valuation of the forward contract. These derivative instruments are not designated as hedges under SFAS 133.
15
The table below summarizes our outstanding foreign currency forward contracts. The currencies in this table represent 88% of the notional amounts of contracts outstanding as of June 28, 2009.
In millions |
|
Currency Denomination |
|
Currency |
|
June 28, 2009 |
|
United States Dollar (USD) |
|
57 |
|
British Pound Sterling (GBP) |
|
106 |
|
Euro (EUR) |
|
22 |
|
Singapore Dollar (SGD) |
|
22 |
|
Indian Rupee (INR) |
|
1,407 |
|
Romanian Leu (RON) |
|
41 |
|
Chinese Renminbi (CNY) |
|
57 |
|
Commodity Price Risk
We are exposed to fluctuations in commodity prices due to contractual agreements with component suppliers. In order to protect ourselves against future price volatility and, consequently, fluctuations in gross margins, we periodically enter into commodity forward contracts with designated banks to fix the cost of certain raw material purchases with the objective of minimizing changes in inventory cost due to market price fluctuations. The forward contracts are derivative contracts that are designated as cash flow hedges under SFAS 133. The effective portion of the unrealized gain or loss is deferred and reported as a component of AOCL. When the hedged forecasted transaction (purchase) occurs, the unrealized gain or loss is reclassified into income in the same line item associated with the hedged transaction in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction affects income. The ineffective portion of the hedge, if any, is recognized in current income in the period in which the ineffectiveness occurs. As of June 28, 2009, we expect to reclassify an unrealized net loss of $17 million from AOCL to income over the next year. For the six month period ended June 28, 2009, we discontinued hedge accounting on certain contracts where the forecasted transactions were no longer probable. The amount reclassified to income as a result of this action was a loss of $2 million.
Our internal policy allows for managing these cash flow hedges for up to three years. The following table summarizes our outstanding commodity forward contracts that were entered into to hedge the cost of certain raw material purchases:
Dollars in millions |
|
June 28, 2009 |
|
|||
Commodity |
|
Notional Amount |
|
Quantity |
|
|
Copper |
|
$ |
130 |
|
19,133 metric tons |
(1) |
Platinum |
|
26 |
|
27,194 troy ounces |
(2) |
|
Palladium |
|
1 |
|
4,958 troy ounces |
(2) |
|
(1) A metric ton is a measurement of mass equal to 1,000 kilograms. |
(2) A troy ounce is a measurement of mass equal to approximately 31 grams. |
Interest Rate Risk
We are exposed to market risk from fluctuations in interest rates. We manage our exposure to interest rate fluctuations through the use of interest rate swaps. The objective of the swaps is to more effectively balance our borrowing costs and interest rate risk.
16
In November 2005, we entered into an interest rate swap to effectively convert our $250 million debt, due in 2028, from a fixed rate of 7.125% to a floating rate based on a LIBOR spread. The terms of the swap mirror those of the debt, with interest paid semi-annually. This swap qualifies as a fair value hedge under SFAS 133. The gain or loss on this derivative instrument as well as the offsetting gain or loss on the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk are recognized in current income as Interest expense. These gains and losses for the three and six month periods ended June 28, 2009, were as follows:
|
|
June 28, 2009 |
|
||||||||||
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Six months ended |
|
||||||||
In
millions |
|
Gain/(Loss) |
|
Gain/(Loss)
on |
|
Gain/(Loss) |
|
Gain/(Loss)
on |
|
||||
Interest expense |
|
$ |
(17 |
) |
$ |
17 |
|
$ |
(46 |
) |
$ |
46 |
|
Location and Fair Value Amount of Derivative Instruments
The following tables summarize the location and fair value of derivative instruments on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets:
|
|
Asset Derivatives |
|
|||
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
In millions |
|
June 28, |
|
Balance Sheet Location |
|
|
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments under SFAS 133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
$ |
8 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
Commodity forward contracts |
|
4 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
Commodity forward contracts |
|
3 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
Interest rate contract |
|
33 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments under SFAS 133 |
|
$ |
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under SFAS 133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
$ |
1 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under SFAS 133 |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total asset derivatives |
|
$ |
49 |
|
|
|
|
|
Liability Derivatives |
|
|||
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
In millions |
|
June 28, |
|
Balance Sheet Location |
|
|
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments under SFAS 133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity forward contracts |
|
$ |
23 |
|
Other accrued expenses |
|
Commodity forward contracts |
|
9 |
|
Other liabilities and deferred revenue |
|
|
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments under SFAS 133 |
|
$ |
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liability derivatives |
|
$ |
32 |
|
|
|
17
Cash Flow Hedging
The tables below summarize the effect on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for derivative instruments classified as cash flow hedges for the three and six month interim reporting periods presented below. The tables do not include amounts related to ineffectiveness as it was not material for the periods presented.
|
|
Three months ended June 28, 2009 |
|
|
|
||||
In millions Hedging Relationships |
|
Amount of Gain/(Loss) |
|
Amount of Gain/(Loss) |
|
Location of Gain/(Loss) |
|
||
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
$ |
10 |
|
$ |
2 |
|
Sales |
|
Commodity forward contracts |
|
(2 |
) |
(10 |
) |
Cost of sales |
|
||
Total |
|
$ |
8 |
|
$ |
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 28, 2009 |
|
|
|
||||
In millions Hedging Relationships |
|
Amount of Gain/(Loss) |
|
Amount of Gain/(Loss) |
|
Location of Gain/(Loss) |
|
||
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
$ |
9 |
|
$ |
(8 |
) |
Sales |
|
Commodity forward contracts |
|
29 |
|
(17 |
) |
Cost of sales |
|
||
Total |
|
$ |
38 |
|
$ |
(25 |
) |
|
|
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
The following table summarizes the effect on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for derivative instruments that are not classified as hedges for the three and six month interim reporting periods ended June 28, 2009.
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain/(Loss) Recognized in |
|
||||
In millions |
|
|
|
Income on Derivatives |
|
||||
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging |
|
Location of Gain/(Loss) Recognized |
|
June 28, 2009 |
|
||||
Instruments under SFAS 133 |
|
in Income on Derivatives |
|
Three months ended |
|
Six months ended |
|
||
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
Other (expense) income, net |
|
$ |
19 |
|
$ |
18 |
|
NOTE 12. LEASE AMENDMENT AND EXTENSION
During 2001, we entered into a sale-leaseback transaction with a financial institution with regard to certain heavy-duty engine manufacturing equipment. The lease was classified as an operating lease with a lease term of 11.5 years, expiring June 28, 2013. The financial institution created a grantor trust to act as the lessor in the arrangement. The financial institution owns all of the equity in the trust. The grantor trust has no assets other than the equipment and its rights to the lease agreement with us. On the initial sale, we received $125 million from the financial institution which was financed with $99 million of non-recourse debt and $26 million of equity. Our obligations to the grantor trust consisted of the payments due under the lease and a $9 million guarantee of the residual value of the equipment. In addition, we had a fixed price purchase option that was exercisable on January 14, 2009, for approximately $35 million; however, we decided not to exercise this option.
In December 2003, the grantor trust which acts as the lessor in the sale and leaseback transaction described above was consolidated as a result of the adoption of FIN 46(R), due primarily to the existence of the residual value guarantee. As a result of the consolidation, the manufacturing equipment and the trusts obligations under its non-recourse debt arrangement was included in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as property, plant and equipment and long-term debt, respectively. The equity in the trust held by the financial institution was reported as noncontrolling interest. The non-recourse debt arrangement is more fully discussed in Note 10 to our annual Consolidated Financial Statements included in our 2008 Form 10-K. In addition, our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income included interest expense on the lessors debt obligations and depreciation expense on the manufacturing equipment rather than rent expense under the lease agreement. In April 2008, the trust made the final payment on the non-recourse debt.
In February 2009, we amended the lease agreement to extend the lease for an additional two years to June 2015, and we removed the residual value guarantee. As a result of removing the residual value guarantee, we are no longer
18
required to consolidate the grantor trust and we deconsolidated the trust in the first quarter of 2009. With the deconsolidation, we are now required to account for the leasing arrangement with the trust which qualifies as a capital lease. The deconsolidation of the trust had minimal impact on our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements as the present value of the minimum lease payments (including the extension) approximated the amount that was reported as noncontrolling interest as of the date of the amendment. The reduction in noncontrolling interests and increase in our capital lease liabilities was $35 million.
The future lease payments required under the amended lease are as follows:
In millions |
|
Payment |
|
|
Due date |
|
amount |
|
|
2009 |
|
$ |
3 |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
|
2012 |
|
12 |
|
|
2013 |
|
10 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
18 |
|
|
The lease agreement includes certain default provisions requiring us to make timely rent payments, maintain, service, repair and insure the equipment and maintain minimum debt ratings for our long-term senior unsecured debt obligations.
NOTE 13. OPERATING SEGMENTS
Our reportable operating segments consist of the following: Engine, Power Generation, Components and Distribution. This reporting structure is organized according to the products and markets each segment serves. We use segment EBIT (defined as earnings or loss before interest expense, income taxes and noncontrolling interests) as the primary basis for the chief operating decision-maker to evaluate the performance of each operating segment.
19
A summary of operating results by segment for the three and six month periods is shown below:
In millions |
|
Engine |
|
Power |
|
Components |
|
Distribution |
|
Non-segment |
|
Total |
|
||||||
Three months ended June 28, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
External sales |
|
$ |
1,133 |
|
$ |
481 |
|
$ |
355 |
|
$ |
462 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
2,431 |
|
Intersegment sales |
|
173 |
|
129 |
|
147 |
|
1 |
|
(450 |
) |
|
|
||||||
Total sales |
|
1,306 |
|
610 |
|
502 |
|
463 |
|
(450 |
) |
2,431 |
|
||||||
Depreciation and amortization(2) |
|
45 |
|
11 |
|
17 |
|
4 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
||||||
Research, development and engineering expense |
|
51 |
|
8 |
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
79 |
|
||||||
Equity, royalty and interest income from investees |
|
17 |
|
6 |
|
4 |
|
30 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
||||||
Restructuring charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
7 |
|
||||||
Interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
||||||
Segment EBIT |
|
(4 |
) |
41 |
|
(10 |
) |
55 |
|
27 |
|
109 |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Three months ended June 29, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
External sales |
|
$ |
2,030 |
|
$ |
692 |
|
$ |
584 |
|
$ |
581 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
3,887 |
|
Intersegment sales |
|
356 |
|
246 |
|
271 |
|
|
|