Edgar Filing: DREW INDUSTRIES INC

Unassociated Document

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended: JUNE 30, 2007

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _________________ to _________________

Commission File Number: 0-13646

DREW INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	13-3250533
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

200 Mamaroneck Avenue, White Plains, NY 10601

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(914) 428-9098

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report) N/A

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Large Accelerated Filer ____ Accelerated Filer x Non-accelerated filer o

Indicated by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date. 21,816,529 shares of common stock as of July 31, 2007.

DREW INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FILED WITH

QUARTERLY REPORT OF REGISTRANT ON FORM 10-Q

FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2007

(UNAUDITED)

		Page
PART I -	FINANCIAL INFORMATION

	Item 1 - FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

	CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME	3

	CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS	4

	CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS	5

	CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY	6

	NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS	7-16

	Item 2 - MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
	OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS	17-30

	Item 3 - QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES
	ABOUT MARKET RISK	31

	Item 4 - CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	32

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

	Item 1 - LEGAL PROCEEDINGS	35

	Item 1A - RISK FACTORS	36

	Item 6 - EXHIBITS	36

SIGNATURES		37

EXHIBIT 31.1 - SECTION 302 CEO CERTIFICATION

EXHIBIT 31.2 - SECTION 302 CFO CERTIFICATION

EXHIBIT 32.1 - SECTION 906 CEO CERTIFICATION

EXHIBIT 32.2 - SECTION 906 CFO CERTIFICATION

DREW INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(Unaudited)

	Six Months Ended June 30,				Three Months Ended June 30,
	2007		2006		2007		2006
(In thousands, except per share amounts)

Net sales	$	357,400	$	410,437	$	184,456	$	201,976
Cost of sales		272,455		322,131		138,683		157,371
Gross profit		84,945		88,306		45,773		44,605
Selling, general and administrative expenses		48,063		53,471		24,789		26,898
Other income		656		574		-		-
Operating profit		37,538		35,409		20,984		17,707
Interest expense, net		1,552		2,134		640		1,015
Income before income taxes		35,986		33,275		20,344		16,692
Provision for income taxes		13,835		12,839		7,782		6,461
Net income	$	22,151	$	20,436	$	12,562	$	10,231

Net income per common share:
Basic	$	1.02	$	0.95	$	0.57	$	0.47
Diluted	$	1.01	$	0.93	$	0.57	$	0.47

Weighted average common shares outstanding:
Basic		21,817		21,579		21,852		21,591
Diluted		22,025		21,896		22,091		21,894

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

DREW INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)

	June 30,						December 31,
	2007			2006			2006
(In thousands, except shares and per share amount)

ASSETS
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	38,561		$	5,345		$	6,785
Accounts receivable, trade, less allowances		36,521			40,485			17,828
Inventories		75,053			109,528			83,076
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		9,830			9,666			13,351

Total current assets		159,965			165,024			121,040

Fixed assets, net		115,080			128,412			124,558
Goodwill		35,868			34,804			34,344
Other intangible assets		28,858			26,412			24,801
Other assets		7,218			5,716			6,533

Total assets	$	346,989		$	360,368		$	311,276

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities
Notes payable, including current maturities of
long-term indebtedness	$	10,478		$	9,852		$	9,714
Accounts payable, trade		20,235			29,356			12,027
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities		44,733			38,895			37,320

Total current liabilities		75,446			78,103			59,061

Long-term indebtedness		37,295			89,121			45,966
Other long-term liabilities		3,816			2,481			1,361

Total liabilities		116,557			169,705			106,388

Stockholders’ equity
Common stock, par value $.01 per share: authorized
30,000,000 shares; issued 23,960,754 shares at June 2007;
23,679,561 shares at June 2006 and 23,833,045 at
December 2006		240			237			238
Paid-in capital		57,323			50,080			53,973
Retained earnings		192,189			159,451			170,038
Accumulated other comprehensive income		147			362			106
		249,899			210,130			224,355
Treasury stock, at cost - 2,149,325 shares		(19,467	)		(19,467	)		(19,467	)
Total stockholders’ equity		230,432			190,663			204,888

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	346,989		$	360,368		$	311,276

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

DREW INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2007			2006
(In thousands)
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	22,151		$	20,436
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash flows provided by
operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		8,941			7,310
Deferred taxes		(310	)		1,050
Loss / (gain) on disposal of fixed assets		1,631			(289	)
Stock-based compensation expense		1,214			1,701
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of business acquisitions:
Accounts receivable, net		(18,069	)		(5,385	)
Inventories		8,849			(6,233	)
Prepaid expenses and other assets		741			1,636
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities		18,360			2,366
Net cash flows provided by operating activities		43,508			22,592

Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures		(5,425	)		(16,391	)
Acquisition of businesses		(6,594	)		(32,977	)
Proceeds from sales of fixed assets		6,072			1,349
Other investments		(16	)		(2	)
Net cash flows used for investing activities		(5,963	)		(48,021	)

Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from line of credit and other borrowings		23,792			128,620
Repayments under line of credit and other borrowings		(31,699	)		(103,612	)
Exercise of stock options		2,138			725
Other		-			(44	)
Net cash flows (used for) provided by financing activities		(5,769	)		25,689

Net increase in cash		31,776			260

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		6,785			5,085
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	38,561		$	5,345

Supplemental disclosure of cash flows information:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest on debt	$	1,658		$	1,965
Income taxes, net of refunds	$	7,225		$	10,426

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

DREW INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(Unaudited)

	Common Stock		Paid-in Capital		Retained Earnings		Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income		Treasury Stock			Total Stockholders’ Equity

(In thousands, except shares)

Balance - December 31, 2006	$	238	$	53,973	$	170,038	$	106	$	(19,467	)	$	204,888
Net income for the six months
ended June 30, 2007						22,151							22,151
Unrealized gain on interest rate
swap, net of taxes								41					41
Comprehensive income													22,192
Issuance of 126,620 shares of
common stock pursuant to stock
options exercised		2		1,150									1,152
Income tax benefit relating to
issuance of common stock
pursuant to stock options exercised				986									986
Stock-based compensation expense				1,214									1,214

Balance - June 30, 2007	$	240	$	57,323	$	192,189	$	147	$	(19,467	)	$	230,432

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

DREW INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

1. Basis of Presentation

The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Drew Industries Incorporated and its subsidiaries (“Drew” or the “Company”). Drew has no unconsolidated subsidiaries. Drew’s wholly-owned active subsidiaries are Kinro, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively “Kinro”), and Lippert Components, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively “Lippert”). Drew, through its wholly-owned subsidiaries, manufactures a broad array of components for recreational vehicles (“RVs”) and manufactured homes, and to a lesser extent manufactures specialty trailers and related axles. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. Certain prior year balances have been reclassified to conform to current year presentation.

The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements presented herein have been prepared by the Company in accordance with the accounting policies described in its December 31, 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K and should be read in conjunction with the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements which appear in that report.

In the opinion of management, the information furnished in this Form 10-Q reflects all adjustments necessary for a fair statement of the financial position and results of operations as of and for the six and three month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and therefore do not include some information and notes necessary to conform with annual reporting requirements.

2. Segment Reporting

The Company has two reportable operating segments, the recreational vehicle products segment (the "RV Segment") and the manufactured housing products segment (the "MH Segment"). The RV Segment, which accounted for 74 percent and 70 percent of consolidated net sales for the six month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, manufactures a variety of products used in the production of RVs, including windows, doors, chassis, chassis parts, slide-out mechanisms and related power units and electric stabilizer jacks. During the last few years, the Company has also introduced leveling devices, axles, steps, bedlifts, suspension systems, ramp doors, exterior panels, and thermoformed bath and kitchen products for RVs. Approximately 90 percent of the Company’s RV Segment sales are of products used in travel trailers and fifth wheel RVs. The balance represents sales of components for motorhomes, as well as specialty trailers for hauling equipment, boats, personal watercraft and snowmobiles, and axles for specialty trailers.

The MH Segment, which accounted for 26 percent and 30 percent of consolidated net sales for the six month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, manufactures a variety of products used in the production of manufactured homes and to a lesser extent, modular housing and office units, including vinyl and aluminum windows and screens, chassis, chassis parts, axles, tires and thermoformed bath and kitchen products.

Other than sales of specialty trailers, which aggregated $10 million and $15 million in the first six months of 2007 and 2006, respectively, and $25 million in all of 2006, sales other than to manufacturers of RVs and manufactured homes are not considered significant. However, certain of the Company’s MH Segment customers manufacture both manufactured homes and modular homes, and certain of the products manufactured by the Company are suitable for both manufactured homes and modular homes, thus the Company is not always able to determine in which type of home its products are installed. Intersegment sales are insignificant.

DREW INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(Unaudited)

Decisions concerning the allocation of the Company's resources are made by the Company's key executives. This group evaluates the performance of each segment based upon segment operating profit or loss, defined as income before interest, amortization of intangibles and income taxes. Decisions concerning the allocation of resources are also based on each segment’s utilization of operating assets. Management of debt is considered a corporate function. The accounting policies of the RV and MH segments are the same as those described in Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company’s December 31, 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Information relating to segments follows (in thousands):

	Six Months Ended June 30,						Three Months Ended June 30,
	2007			2006			2007			2006
Net sales:
RV segment	$	263,037		$	289,317		$	133,905		$	139,901
MH segment		94,363			121,120			50,551			62,075
Total net sales	$	357,400		$	410,437		$	184,456		$	201,976

Operating profit:
RV segment	$	35,631		$	27,359		$	19,765		$	13,815
MH segment		7,071			12,306			4,271			6,385
Total segment operating profit		42,702			39,665			24,036			20,200
Amortization of intangibles		(1,903	)		(937	)		(1,022	)		(507	)
Corporate and other		(3,917	)		(3,893	)		(2,030	)		(1,986	)
Other income		656			574			-			-
Total operating profit	$	37,538		$	35,409		$	20,984		$	17,707

3. Acquisitions

On July 6, 2007, Lippert acquired certain assets, liabilities and the business of Extreme Engineering, Inc. (“Extreme Engineering”), a manufacturer of specialty trailers for high-end boats, along with its affiliate, Pivit Hitch, Inc. Extreme Engineering and Pivit Hitch had combined annual sales of $12 million prior to the acquisition. The purchase price for the two companies was $10.7 million, which was financed from available cash. Extreme Engineering's Extreme Custom Trailers^® are built according to customer specifications, and are sold through dealers and manufacturers of ski boats and high performance boats across the United States. Lippert will continue production at Extreme Engineering's existing leased facility in Riverside, California. Lippert also intends to transfer certain of its existing specialty trailer manufacturing operations to Extreme's facility in connection with the anticipated consolidation of certain existing West Coast factories.

On May 21, 2007, Lippert acquired certain assets and the business of Coach Step, a manufacturer of patented electric steps for motorhomes. Coach Step had annual sales of $2 million prior to the acquisition. The purchase price was $3.0 million, which was financed from available cash. The results of the acquired Coach Step business have been included in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Income beginning May 21, 2007. The Company is in the process of integrating Coach Step’s business into existing Lippert facilities.

DREW INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(Unaudited)

Total consideration for the Coach Step acquisition was allocated on an estimated basis, pending the final valuations for certain intangible assets, as follows (in thousands):

Net tangible assets acquired	$	718
Identifiable intangible assets		1,800
Goodwill		599
Total cash consideration	$	3,117

On January 2, 2007, Lippert acquired Trailair, Inc. (“Trailair”) and certain assets and the business of Equa-Flex, Inc. (“Equa-Flex”), two affiliated companies, which manufacture several patented products, including innovative suspension systems used primarily for towable RVs. Trailair and Equa-Flex had combined annual sales of $3 million prior to the acquisition. The minimum aggregate purchase price was $5.7 million, of which $3.5 million was paid at closing and the balance will be paid annually over the next five years. The aggregate purchase price, including non-compete agreements, could increase to a maximum of $8.3 million if certain sales targets for these products are achieved by Lippert over the next five years. The annual payments to be made over the next five years bear interest at the stated rate of 3 percent per annum from the date of the acquisition. The results of the acquired Trailair and Equa-Flex businesses have been included in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Income beginning January 2, 2007. The acquisition was financed with borrowings under the Company's existing Line of Credit pursuant to the Credit Agreement (the “Line of Credit”). The Company has integrated Trailair and Equa-Flex’s business into existing Lippert facilities.

Total consideration for the Trailair and Equa-Flex acquisitions was allocated on an estimated basis, pending the final valuations for certain intangible assets, as follows (in thousands):

Net tangible assets acquired	$	544
Identifiable intangible assets		4,000
Goodwill		894
Total consideration		5,438
Less: Present value of future minimum payments		(1,961	)
Total cash consideration	$	3,477

4. Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents. Investments, which consist of money market funds, are recorded at cost which approximates market value. Investments were $36.3 million and $3.5 million at June 30, 2007 and June 30, 2006, respectively.

5. Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (using the first-in, first-out method) or market. Cost includes material, labor and overhead; market is replacement cost or realizable value after allowance for costs of distribution.

DREW INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Inventories consist of the following (in thousands):

	June 30,				December 31,
	2007		2006		2006

Finished goods	$	11,477	$	16,075	$	13,513
Work in process		3,375		5,831		3,868
Raw material		60,201		87,622		65,695
Total	$	75,053	$	109,528	$	83,076

6. Long-term Indebtedness

Long-term indebtedness consists of the following (dollars in thousands):

	June 30,				December 31,
	2007		2006		2006
Senior Promissory Notes payable at the rate of $1,000 per
quarter on January 29, April 29, July 29 and October 29,
with interest payable quarterly at the rate of 5.01 percent per
annum, final payment to be made on April 29, 2010	$	12,000	$	16,000	$	14,000
Senior Promissory Notes payable at the rate of $536 per
quarter on the last business day of March, June, September,
and December, with interest payable at the rate of LIBOR
plus 1.65 percent per annum, final payment to be
made on June 28, 2013		12,857		15,000		13,929
Notes payable pursuant to a Credit Agreement expiring
June 30, 2009 consisting of a Line of Credit, not to exceed
$70,000, with interest at prime rate or LIBOR plus a rate
margin based upon the Company’s performance		10,000		49,000		12,000
Industrial Revenue Bonds, interest rates at June 30, 2007
of 4.68% to 6.28%, due 2008 through 2017; secured by
certain real estate and equipment		6,097		8,756		8,077
Other loans primarily secured by certain real estate and
equipment, due 2008 to 2011, with fixed interest rates
at June 30, 2007 of 5.18% to 6.63%		5,019		6,741		5,780
Other loans primarily secured by certain real estate and
equipment, due 2011 to 2016, with variable interest rates
at June 30, 2007 of 7.00% to 8.50%		1,800		3,476		1,894
		47,773		98,973		55,680
Less current portion		10,478		9,852		9,714

Total long-term indebtedness	$	37,295	$	89,121	$	45,966

The weighted average interest rate for the Company’s indebtedness was 5.63 percent at June 30, 2007.

DREW INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

(Unaudited)

On October 18, 2004, the Company entered into a five-year interest rate swap with KeyBank National Association with an initial notional amount of $20.0 million from which it will receive periodic payments at the 3 month LIBOR rate (5.36 percent at June 30, 2007 based upon the May 15, 2007 reset date), and make periodic payments at a fixed rate of 3.35 percent, with settlement and rate reset dates every November 15, February 15, May 15 and August 15. The notional amount of the interest rate swap decreases by $1.0 million on each quarterly reset date. At June 30, 2007, the notional amount was $10.0 million. The fair value of the swap was zero at inception, and $0.3 million at June 30, 2007. The Company has designated this swap as a cash flow hedge of certain borrowings under the Line of Credit and recognized the effective portion of the change in fair value as part of other comprehensive income, with the ineffective portion, which was insignificant, recognized in earnings currently.

On June 13, 2006, the Company entered into a seven-year interest rate swap with HSBC Bank USA, NA with an initial notional amount of $15.0 million from which it will receive periodic payments at the 3 month LIBOR rate (5.36 percent at June 30, 2007 based upon the June 29, 2007 reset date) and make periodic payments at a fixed rate of 5.39 percent, with settlement and rate reset dates on the last business day of every March, June, September and December. The notional amount of the interest rate swap decreases by $0.5 million on each quarterly reset date beginning September 29, 2006. At June 30, 2007, the notional amount was $12.9 million. The fair value of the swap was zero at inception, and ($18,000) at June 30, 2007. The Company has designated this swap as a cash flow hedge of the Senior Promissory Notes due on June 28, 2013, and recognized the effective portion of the change in fair value as part of other comprehensive income, with the ineffective portion, which was insignificant, recognized in earnings currently.

Pursuant to the Senior Promissory Notes, Credit Agreement, and certain other loan agreements, the Company is required to maintain minimum net worth and interest and fixed charge coverages and to meet certain other financial requirements. At June 30, 2007, the Company was in compliance with all such requirements. Certain of the Company’s loan agreements contain prepayment penalties. The Senior Promissory Notes and the Line of Credit are secured by first priority liens on the capital stock (or other equity interests) of each of the Company’s direct and indirect subsidiaries.

The maximum borrowings under the Line of Credit can be increased by $20.0 million, upon approval of the lenders.

The Company has a “shelf-loan” facility with Prudential Investment Management, Inc. (“Prudential”) under which the Company had borrowed $35.0 million, of which $24.9 million was outstanding at June 30, 2007. Pursuant to the terms of the shelf loan facility, the Company can issue, and Prudential’s affiliates may, in their sole discretion, consider purchasing in one or a series of transactions, Senior Promissory Notes of the Company in the aggregate principal amount of an additional $25.0 million, to mature no more than seven years after the date of original issue of each transaction. Prudential and its affiliates have no obligation to purchase the Senior Promissory Notes.

DREW INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

(Unaudited)

7. Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding

The following reconciliation details the denominator used in the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share (in thousands):

	Six Months Ended				Three Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
	2007		2006		2007		2006

Weighted average shares outstanding
for basic earnings per share		21,817		21,579		21,852		21,591
Common stock equivalents pertaining
to stock options		208		317		239		303
Total for diluted shares		22,025		21,896		22,091		21,894

8. Commitments and Contingencies

Litigation

On or about October 11, 2005 and October 12, 2005, two actions were commenced in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Sacramento, entitled Arlen Williams, Jr. vs. Weekend Warrior Trailers, Inc., Zieman Manufacturing Company, et. al. (Case No. CV027691), and Joseph Giordano and Dennis Gish, vs. Weekend Warrior Trailers, Inc, and Zieman Manufacturing Company, et. al. (Case No. 05AS04523). Each case purports to be a class action on behalf of the named plaintiffs and all others similarly situated. The complaints in both cases are substantially identical and the cases were consolidated. Defendant Zieman Manufacturing Company (“Zieman”) is a subsidiary of Lippert.

Plaintiffs allege that defendant Weekend Warrior sold certain toy hauler trailers during the model years 1999 - 2005 equipped with frames manufactured by Zieman that are defective in design and manufacture. Plaintiffs allege that the defects cause the trailer to place excessive weight on the trailer coach tongue and the towing vehicle’s trailer hitch, causing damage to the trailers and the towing vehicles, and that the tires on the trailers do not support the advertised maximum towing capacity of the trailers. Plaintiffs seek to certify a class of residents of California who purchased such new or used models. Plaintiffs seek monetary damages in an unspecified amount (including compensatory, incidental and consequential damages), punitive damages, restitution, declaratory and injunctive relief, attorney’s fees and costs.

Zieman is vigorously defending against the allegations made by plaintiffs, as well as plaintiffs’ ability to pursue the claims as a class action. Zieman and Lippert’s liability insurers have agreed to defend Zieman, subject to reservation of the insurers’ rights. Mandatory mediation was conducted. The parties reached a settlement in principle, and are negotiating the terms of a long-form settlement agreement. The settlement would not result in a material liability to Zieman. However, unless and until the long-form settlement agreement is executed by the parties and approved by the Court, the outcome cannot be predicted.

On or about January 3, 2007, an action was commenced in the United States District Court, Central District of California entitled Gonzalez vs. Drew Industries Incorporated, Kinro, Inc., Kinro Texas Limited Partnership d/b/a Better Bath Components; Skyline Corporation, and Skylines Homes, Inc. (Case No. CV06-08233). The case purports to be a class action on behalf of the named plaintiff and all others similarly situated.

DREW INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

(Unaudited)

Plaintiffs allege that certain bathtubs manufactured by Kinro Texas Limited Partnership, a subsidiary of Kinro, Inc., and sold under the name “Better Bath” for use in manufactured homes, fail to comply with certain safety standards relating to fire spread control established by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”). Plaintiff alleges that sale of these products is in violation of various provisions of the California Consumers Legal Remedies Act (Sec. 1770 et seq.), the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act (Sec. 2301 et seq.), and the California Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act (Sec. 1790 et seq.).

Plaintiffs seek to require defendants to notify members of the class of the allegations in the proceeding and the claims made, to repair or replace the allegedly defective products, to reimburse members of the class for repair, replacement and consequential costs, to cease the sale and distribution of the allegedly defective products, and to pay actual and punitive damages and plaintiffs’ attorneys fees.

Defendant Kinro has conducted a comprehensive investigation of the allegations made in connection with the claims, including with respect to the HUD safety standards, prior test results, testing procedures, and the use of labels. In addition, multiple tests were recently conducted by independent laboratories at Kinro’s initiative.

Although discovery by plaintiff and by Kinro is continuing, at this point, based on the foregoing investigation and testing, Kinro believes that plaintiff may not be able to prove the essential elements of her claim. As a result, defendants intend to vigorously defend against the claims, as well as against plaintiff’s ability to pursue the claims as a class action.

Moreover, Kinro believes that, because test results received by Kinro confirm that it is in compliance with HUD safety standards, no remedial action is required or appropriate.

If plaintiff nevertheless pursues its claims, protracted litigation could result, and the outcome of such litigation cannot be predicted.

In the normal course of business, the Company is subject to proceedings, lawsuits and other claims. All such matters are subject to uncertainties and outcomes that are not predictable with assurance. While these matters could materially affect operating results when resolved in future periods, it is management’s opinion that after final disposition, including anticipated insurance recoveries, any monetary liability or financial impact to the Company beyond that provided in the consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2007, would not be material to the Company’s financial position or annual results of operations.

Income Taxes

The Company periodically undergoes examinations by the IRS, as well as various state jurisdictions. The IRS and other taxing authorities routinely challenge certain deductions and positions reported by the Company on its income tax returns. During the third quarter of 2006, the IRS completed an audit of the Company’s 2003 federal tax return, and found no changes. For federal income tax purposes, the tax years 2004 through 2006 remain subject to examination.

DREW INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

(Unaudited)

In connection with a tax audit by the Indiana Department of Revenue pertaining to calendar years 1998 to 2000, the Company received an initial examination report asserting, in the aggregate, $1.2 million of proposed tax adjustments, including interest and penalties. After two hearings with the Indiana Department of Revenue, the audit findings were upheld. The Company believes that it has properly reported its income and paid taxes in Indiana in accordance with applicable laws, and filed an appeal in December 2006 with the Indiana Tax Court. A trial date has been set for February 2008. All tax years subsequent to 2000 also remain open to examination by the Indiana Department of Revenue.

The Company has assessed its risks associated with the above matter, as well as all other tax return positions, and believes that its tax reserve estimates reflect its best estimate of the deductions and positions that it will be able to sustain, or that it may be willing to concede as part of a settlement. While these tax matters could materially affect operating results when resolved in future periods, it is management’s opinion that after final disposition, any monetary liability or financial impact to the Company beyond that provided in the consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2007, would not be material to the Company’s financial position or annual results of operations.

Other Income

In February 2004, the Company sold certain intellectual property rights for $4.0 million, consisting of cash of $0.1 million at closing and a note of $3.9 million, payable over five years. The note was initially recorded net of a reserve of $3.4 million. In January 2007 and 2006, the Company received payments aggregating $0.8 million and $0.7 million, respectively, including interest, which had been previously fully reserved, and the Company therefore recorded a gain. In July 2007, the Company received $0.1 million, representing the semi-annual interest payment. The balance of the note is $1.7 million at June 30, 2007, which is fully reserved.

Sale-Leaseback

On July 3, 2006, the Company entered into a sale-leaseback transaction for one of its facilities in California. Under the sale-leaseback, the facility, with a net book value of $2.7 million, was sold for $5.7 million and leased-back under an operating lease, currently scheduled to terminate in September 2007, at $15,000 per month. In connection with the sale, the Company received $1.8 million in cash and a $3.9 million purchase money mortgage bearing interest at 5 percent per annum payable monthly. The mortgage is due and payable in the fourth quarter of 2007, and is secured only by the facility sold. The gain on this transaction, approximately $2.8 million after direct costs incurred on the transaction, was deferred, and will be recognized upon the payment of the mortgage. The Company intends to combine the operations conducted at this facility with its other West Coast operations.

Facilities Consolidation

Over the past twelve months, the Company has consolidated 10 facilities into other existing facilities, and plans have been made to consolidate at least an additional 5 facilities over the balance of 2007. Five facilities were sold during the first six months of 2007. In connection with the determination to close facilities, the Company recorded a net charge of $1.6 million ($1.4 million after the direct impact on incentive compensation) in the first six months of 2007 and $0.9 million ($0.8 million after the direct impact on incentive compensation) during the second quarter of 2007 to reflect the net loss on sold facilities and the write-down to estimated current market value of facilities to be sold. In addition, the Company eliminated more than 90 salaried positions. The severance costs incurred by the Company were not significant.

DREW INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

(Unaudited)

Use of Estimates

The preparation of these financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires the Company to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, the Company evaluates its estimates, including, but not limited to, those related to product returns, accounts receivable, inventories, notes receivable, goodwill and other intangible assets, income taxes, warranty obligations, self insurance obligations, lease terminations, asset retirement obligations, long-lived assets, post-retirement benefits, segment allocations, and contingencies and litigation. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience, other available information, and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other resources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

The Company has remained profitable in the MH Segment despite the 73 percent decline in manufactured housing industry production since 1998. The Company continues to monitor the goodwill and other intangible assets related to the MH Segment for potential impairment. A further significant downturn in this industry could result in an impairment of the goodwill or other intangible assets of the MH Segment.

9. New Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes - an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109,” (“FIN 48”). FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in tax positions and requires that a company recognize in its financial statements the impact of a tax position, only if that position is more likely than not of being sustained on audit, based on the technical merits of the position. The Company adopted the provisions of FIN 48 on January 1, 2007. As a result of the implementation of FIN 48, the Company recognized no material adjustment to the liability for unrecognized income tax benefits.

As of January 1, 2007, the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits is $3.8 million, which, if recognized, would impact the Company’s annual effective tax rate. The amount of unrecognized tax benefit as of June 30, 2007 did not change significantly from the amount as of the adoption of FIN 48.

The Company’s policy regarding the classification of interest and penalties recognized in accordance with FIN 48 is to classify them as income tax expense in its financial statements. On January 1, 2007, the total amount of such accrued interest and penalties is $0.9 million.

DREW INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

(Unaudited)

In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”, which establishes a framework for reporting fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The provisions of SFAS No. 157 are effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this standard.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities - Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115.” SFAS No. 159 permits companies to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value at specified election dates, and report unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected in earnings. The provisions of SFAS No. 159 are effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this standard.

DREW INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The Company has two reportable operating segments, the recreational vehicle products segment (the “RV Segment”) and the manufactured housing products segment (the “MH Segment”). The Company’s operations are conducted through its operating subsidiaries, Kinro, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively, “Kinro”) and Lippert Components, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively, “Lippert”). Each has operations in both the RV and MH segments. At June 30, 2007, the Company’s subsidiaries operated 41 plants in the United States.

The RV Segment accounted for 74 percent of consolidated net sales for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 70 percent of the annual consolidated net sales for 2006. The RV Segment manufactures a variety of products used primarily in the production of recreational vehicles, including windows, doors, chassis, chassis parts, slide-out mechanisms and related power units, and electric stabilizer jacks. During the last few years, the Company has also introduced leveling devices, axles, steps, bedlifts, suspension systems, ramp doors, exterior panels and thermoformed bath and kitchen products for RVs. Approximately 90 percent of the Company’s RV Segment sales are of products used in travel trailers and fifth wheel RVs. The balance represents sales of components for motorhomes, as well as specialty trailers for hauling equipment, boats, personal watercraft and snowmobiles, and axles for specialty trailers. Travel trailers and fifth wheel RVs accounted for 75 percent of all RVs shipped by the industry in 2006, up from 61 percent in 2001.

The MH Segment, which accounted for 26 percent of consolidated net sales for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 30 percent of the annual consolidated net sales for 2006, manufactures a variety of products used in the production of manufactured homes, and to a lesser extent, modular housing and office units, including vinyl and aluminum windows and screens, chassis, chassis parts, axles, tires and thermoformed bath and kitchen products.

Other than sales of specialty trailers and related axles, which aggregated $10 million and $15 million in the first six months of 2007 and 2006, respectively, and $25 million in all of 2006, sales of products other than components for RVs and manufactured homes are not considered significant. However, certain of the Company’s MH Segment customers manufacture both manufactured homes and modular homes, and certain of the products manufactured by the Company are suitable for both manufactured homes and modular homes. As a result, the Company is not always able to determine in which type of home its products are installed. Intersegment sales are insignificant.

BACKGROUND

Recreational Vehicle Industry

In the first half of 2006, wholesale shipments of travel trailers and fifth wheel RVs, the Company’s primary market, exceeded retail sales, resulting in increased dealer inventories. Further, retail sales of travel trailers and fifth wheel RVs began to decline in the summer of 2006, caused by a combination of factors, including rapidly increasing fuel prices, higher interest rates and continued conflict in the Middle East which threatened fuel supplies. In response to reduced retail demand and the resulting high dealer inventory levels, dealers reduced their orders for new RVs.

Since August 2006, retail sales of travel trailers and fifth wheel RVs have been about the same as the comparable period for the prior year, while wholesale shipments of travel trailers and fifth wheel RVs to dealers have declined over the same period, an indication that there has been a reduction in dealer inventories. Retail sales of travel trailers and fifth wheel RVs increased approximately 2 percent through May 2007, the last month for which information is available, compared to a 16 percent decline in the first six months of 2007 in wholesale shipments of travel trailers and fifth wheel RVs.

DREW INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

(Continued)

For the second quarter of 2007, the Recreational Vehicle Industry Association (“RVIA”) reported a 13 percent decrease in wholesale shipments of travel trailers and fifth wheel RVs. However, retail sales of travel trailers and fifth wheel RVs increased approximately 2 percent for April and May 2007, collectively, the last months for which information is available.

As a result of the decrease in wholesale shipments and the increase in retail sales, recent dealer surveys indicate inventories of towable RVs are more in line with dealer targets. With fewer towable RVs on their lots, dealers should be in a better position to increase their orders in response to an improvement in retail demand, if it should occur.

The RVIA has projected a 12 percent decline in wholesale shipments of travel trailers and fifth wheel RVs in 2007. Based upon the actual wholesale shipments for the first six months of 2007, the RVIA projection for all of 2007 implies a 7 percent decrease in wholesale shipments of travel trailers and fifth wheel RVs for the second half of 2007.

In the long-term, RV sales are expected to be driven by positive demographics, as demand for RVs is strongest from the over 50 age group, which is the fastest growing segment of the population. According to U.S. Census Bureau projections released in March 2004, there will be in excess of 20 million more people over the age of 50 by 2014. Since 1997, the RVIA has employed an advertising campaign, with the fourth phase commenced in February 2006, targeted at both parents aged 30-49 with children at home, and couples aged 50-64 with no children at home. Further, the popularity of traveling to NASCAR and other sporting events also appears to be a motivation for consumers to purchase RVs.

Manufactured Housing Industry

As a result of (i) limited credit availability for typical purchasers of manufactured homes, and (ii) high interest rate spreads between conventional mortgages on site built homes and chattel loans for manufactured homes (chattel loans are loans secured only by the home which is sited on leased land), industry production declined approximately 69 percent since 1998, to 117,400 homes in 2006.

The Manufactured Housing Institute (“MHI”) reported that for the six months ended June 30, 2007, industry wholesale shipments of manufactured homes decreased 28 percent over the same period in the prior year. In addition, the slowdown in the real estate market for site-built homes in 2007 may be delaying retirees from selling their primary residence and purchasing a manufactured home. The MHI also that reported industry wholesale shipments of manufactured homes decreased 18 percent in the second quarter of 2007, as compared to the same period in the prior year.

Several economic and industry indicators, including increased backlog levels reported by several producers of manufactured homes, along with an increase in loan applications and the tightening of credit on mortgages for site-built homes, point to the potential for modest increases in wholesale shipments of manufactured homes, although wholesale shipments of manufactured homes to date have remained below prior year levels.

DREW INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

(Continued)

The Company believes that long-term prospects for manufactured housing are positive because of the quality and affordability of the home, and the favorable demographic trends, including increased numbers of retirees, who have been a significant market for manufactured homes.

Raw Material Prices

The prices the Company pays for steel, which represents about half of the Company’s raw material costs, and other key raw materials have increased significantly since the beginning of 2004. During 2006, and continuing into the early part of 2007, except for a temporary decline during the fourth quarter of 2006 for certain raw materials, the Company received further cost increases from its suppliers of key raw materials. To offset the impact of higher raw material costs, the Company implemented sales price increases to its customers. The Company estimates that substantially all raw material cost increases received through June 2007 were passed on to customers.

While the Company has historically been able to obtain sales price increases to offset raw material cost increases, there can be no assurance that future cost increases can be passed on to customers in the form of sales price increases.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Net sales and operating profit are as follows (in thousands):

	Six Months Ended June 30,						Three Months Ended June 30,
	2007			2006			2007			2006
Net sales:
RV segment	$	263,037		$	289,317		$	133,905		$	139,901
MH segment		94,363			121,120			50,551			62,075
Total net sales	$	357,400		$	410,437		$	184,456		$	201,976

Operating profit:
RV segment	$	35,631		$	27,359		$	19,765		$	13,815
MH segment		7,071			12,306			4,271			6,385
Total segment operating profit		42,702			39,665			24,036			20,200
Amortization of intangibles		(1,903	)		(937	)		(1,022	)		(507	)
Corporate and other		(3,917	)		(3,893	)		(2,030	)		(1,986	)
Other income		656			574			-			-
Total operating profit	$	37,538		$	35,409		$	20,984		$	17,707

Consolidated Highlights

Net sales for the second quarter of 2007 decreased $18 million (9 percent) from the second quarter of 2006. The decrease in net sales this quarter was due to an organic sales decline of about $32 million (approximately 16 percent) resulting from the weakness in both the RV and manufactured housing industries, partially offset by sales price increases of approximately $11 million, primarily due to material cost increases, and sales growth of $4 million due to acquisitions.

DREW INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

(Continued)

Net income for the second quarter of 2007 increased 23 percent from the second quarter of 2006 for the following reasons:

In response to the slowdowns in both the RV and manufactured housing industries, over the past 12 months the Company closed 10 facilities and consolidated those operations into other existing facilities, and reduced fixed overhead where prudent, including reducing staff levels by more than 90 salaried employees. These facility consolidations and fixed overhead reductions increased operating profit in the second quarter of 2007 by approximately $1.4 million ($0.9 million after taxes). These cost cutting measures are expected to improve operating profit by more than $5 million in 2007.

Improved production and procurement efficiencies.

Increased profit margins on certain of the Company’s newer product lines, particularly in the axle product line, which had been underperforming.

2006 operating profit was reduced by $1.0 million ($0.6 million after taxes) due to losses at the Indiana specialty trailer operation which was closed in September 2006.

These favorable factors were partially offset by:

Charges to operating profit aggregating $0.8 million ($0.5 million after taxes) to reflect the net loss on sold facilities, and the write-down to estimated current market value of facilities to be sold.

DREW INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

(Continued)

During the last few years, the Company introduced several new products for the RV and specialty trailer markets, including products for the motorhome market, a relatively new RV category for the Company. New products include slide-out mechanisms and leveling devices for motorhomes, axles for towable RVs and specialty trailers, ramp doors and suspension systems for towable RVs, and bed lifts, entry steps, thermoformed bath and kitchen products, and exterior panels for both towable RVs and motorhomes. The Company estimates that the market potential of these products is over $700 million. In the second quarter of 2007, the Company’s sales of these products were running at an annualized rate of approximately $110 million, as compared to an annualized rate of approximately $100 million in the second quarter of 2006, an increase of approximately 10 percent, despite the decline in industry-wide shipments of RVs.

RV Segment - Second Quarter

Net sales of the RV Segment in the second quarter of 2007 decreased 4 percent, or $6 million, as compared to the second quarter of 2006 due to:

A 2007 organic sales decline of approximately $14 million, or 10 percent, of RV related products, as compared to a decline of 13 percent in wholesale shipments of travel trailers and fifth wheel RVs for the same period.

A decline of approximately $2 million in sales of specialty trailers primarily due to the September 2006 closure of the Indiana specialty trailer operation.

Partially offset by:

Sales price increases of approximately $7 million, primarily due to material cost increases.

The impact of sales from acquisitions of approximately $4 million.

The Company’s average product content per type of RV, calculated based upon the Company’s net sales of components for the different types of RVs, excluding Emergency Living Units (“ELUs”) purchased by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (“FEMA”), for the twelve months ended June 30, divided by the wholesale shipments of the different types of RVs by the industry, excluding ELUs, for the twelve months ended June 30, are as follows:

	2007		2006		Percent Change
Content per Travel Trailer and
Fifth Wheel RVs	$	1,663	$	1,447		15	%
Content per Motorhomes	$	321	$	279		15	%
Content per all RVs	$	1,273	$	1,135		12	%

DREW INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

(Continued)

According to the RVIA, industry production for the twelve months ended June 30, are as follows:


	2007		2006		Percent Change
Travel Trailer and Fifth
Wheel RVs		265,800		312,600		(15	)%
Motorhomes		56,600		57,500		(2	)%
All RVs		361,500		412,600		(12	)%

Operating profit of the RV Segment in the second quarter of 2007 increased 43 percent to $19.8 million due to an increase in the operating profit margin to 14.8 percent of net sales in the second quarter of 2007, compared to 9.9 percent of net sales in the second quarter of 2006, partially offset by the decline in sales.

The operating profit margin of the RV Segment in the second quarter of 2007 was favorably impacted by:

Implementation of cost-cutting measures.

Improved production and procurement efficiencies.

Increased profit margins on certain of the Company’s newer product lines, particularly in the axle product line, which had been underperforming.

The elimination of $1.0 million in losses incurred in the Company’s Indiana specialty trailer operation in the second quarter of 2006. This operation was closed in September 2006.

A decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses to 11.1 percent of net sales in the second quarter of 2007 from 11.6 percent of net sales in the second quarter of 2006 due to cost cutting measures implemented, partially offset by the spreading of fixed costs over a smaller sales base, and higher incentive compensation as a percent of net sales due to increased operating profits.

Partially offset by:

The negative impact on the second quarter of 2007 of spreading fixed manufacturing costs over a smaller sales base.

Higher warranty costs based on experience and an industry-wide increase in the number of months between production and the retail sale of RVs.

RV Segment - Year to Date

Net sales of the RV Segment in the first six months of 2007 decreased 9 percent, or $26 million, as compared to the first six months of 2006 due to:

A 2007 organic sales decline of approximately $27 million, or 9 percent, of RV related products.

DREW INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

(Continued)

A decline of approximately $17 million in hurricane-related sales as compared to the first six months of 2006. Subsequent to March 2006, there was no significant hurricane-related activity.

A decline of approximately $5 million in sales of specialty trailers primarily due to the September 2006 closure of the Indiana specialty trailer operation.

DREW INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

(Continued)

Partially offset by:

Sales price increases of approximately $13 million, primarily due to material cost increases.

The impact of sales from acquisitions of approximately $10 million.

The 9 percent organic sales decline in the Company’s RV related products approximated the 11 percent decrease in industry shipments of travel trailers and fifth wheel RVs, which industry shipments exclude both the ELUs purchased by FEMA and the estimated 9,000 travel trailers purchased by dealers related to the 2005 Gulf Coast hurricanes during the first six months of 2006. The Company’s average content for the RVs and ELUs purchased by FEMA was substantially less than the Company’s average content in typical travel trailers.

Operating profit of the RV Segment in the first six months of 2007 increased 30 percent to $35.6 million due to an increase in the operating profit margin to 13.5 percent of net sales in the first six months of 2007, compared to 9.5 percent of net sales in the first six months of 2006, partially offset by the decline in sales.

The operating profit margin of the RV Segment in the first six months of 2007 was favorably impacted by:

Implementation of cost-cutting measures.

Improved production and procurement efficiencies.

A temporary decline in certain raw materials costs purchased during the fourth quarter of 2006 which favorably impacted cost of sales during the early part of 2007.

Increased profit margins on certain of the Company’s newer product lines, particularly in the axle product line, which had been underperforming.

The elimination of $1.9 million in losses incurred in the Company’s Indiana specialty trailer operation in the first six months of 2006. This operation was closed in September 2006.

Lower workers compensation costs.

Selling, general and administrative expenses were consistent at 11.2 percent of net sales in both the first six months of 2007 and 2006 as the cost cutting measures implemented were offset by the spreading of fixed costs over a smaller sales base and higher incentive compensation as a percent of net sales due to increased operating profits.

Partially offset by:

The negative impact on the second quarter of 2007 of spreading fixed manufacturing costs over a smaller sales base.

DREW INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

(Continued)

Higher warranty costs, based on experience and an industry-wide increase in the number of months between production and the retail sale of RVs.

MH Segment - Second Quarter

Net sales of the MH Segment in the second quarter of 2007 decreased 19 percent, or $12 million, as compared to the second quarter of 2006. Excluding the impact of sales price increases (approximately $4 million), primarily due to material cost increases, organic sales of the MH Segment decreased approximately $16 million, or 26 percent, compared to a 18 percent decrease in industry-wide production of manufactured homes. The organic sales of the Company’s MH segment decreased by a greater amount than the manufactured housing industry due largely to a reduction in the average size of the homes produced by the manufactured housing industry, and partly due to a small amount of business the Company exited because of inadequate margins.

The Company’s average product content per manufactured home produced by the industry and total manufactured home floors produced by the industry, calculated based upon the Company’s net sales of components for manufactured homes for the twelve months ended June 30, divided by the number of manufactured homes and manufactured home floors produced by the industry, respectively, for the twelve months ended June 30, are as follows:

	2007		2006		Percent Change
Content per Homes Produced	$	1,853	$	1,631		14	%
Content per Floors Produced	$	1,063	$	981		8	%

According to the MHI, industry production for the twelve months ended June 30, are as follows:

	2007		2006		Percent Change
Total Homes Produced		99,300		147,900		(33	)%
Total Floors Produced		173,000		245,800		(30	)%

Operating profit of the MH Segment in the second quarter of 2007 decreased 33 percent to $4.3 million due to the decrease in net sales, and a decrease in the operating profit margin to 8.4 percent of net sales in the second quarter of 2007, compared to 10.3 percent of net sales in the second quarter of 2006. Operating profit of this segment for the second quarter of 2007 includes charges aggregating $0.6 million to reflect the net loss on sold facilities, and the write-down to estimated current market value of facilities to be sold. Excluding the net impact of these facility write-downs, the operating profit margin of this segment would have been 9.7 percent for the second quarter of 2007.

The operating profit margin of the MH Segment in the second quarter of 2007 was negatively impacted by:

The spreading of fixed manufacturing costs over a smaller sales base.

DREW INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

(Continued)

An increase in selling, general and administrative expenses to 14.3 percent of net sales in the second quarter of 2007 from 13.4 percent of net sales in the second quarter of 2006 due to higher delivery costs as a percent of net sales and the spreading of fixed costs over a smaller sales base.

Partially offset by:

Implementation of cost-cutting measures.

Improved production and procurement efficiencies.

MH Segment - Year to Date

Net sales of the MH Segment in the first six months of 2007 decreased 22 percent, or $27 million, as compared to the first six months of 2006. Excluding the impact of sales price increases (approximately $8 million), primarily due to material cost increases, organic sales of the MH Segment decreased approximately $35 million, or 29 percent, compared to a 28 percent decrease in industry-wide production of manufactured homes. This decline in industry-wide production of manufactured homes from 2006 to 2007 is partly a result of the estimated 3,000 units purchased by FEMA during the early part of 2006 related to the 2005 Gulf Coast hurricanes, which did not recur in 2007. The Company estimates that its hurricane-related sales in the early part of 2006 were approximately $3 million. The purchases by FEMA in early 2006 were primarily single-section homes, in which the Company has substantially less product content per home than multi-section homes, which have represented 72 percent of industry sales since 1999.

Operating profit of the MH Segment in the first six months of 2007 decreased 43 percent to $7.1 million due to the decrease in net sales, and a decrease in the operating profit margin to 7.5 percent of net sales in the first six months of 2007, compared to 10.2 percent of net sales in the first six months of 2006. Operating profit of this segment for the first six months of 2007 includes charges aggregating $0.7 million to reflect the net loss on sold facilities, and the write-down to estimated current market value of facilities to be sold. Excluding the net impact of these facility write-downs, the operating profit margin of this segment would have been 8.3 percent for the first six months of 2007.

The operating profit margin of the MH Segment in the first six months of 2007 was negatively impacted by:

The spreading of fixed manufacturing costs over a smaller sales base.

An increase in selling, general and administrative expenses to 14.4 percent of net sales in the first six months of 2007 from 13.6 percent of net sales in the first six months of 2006 due to higher delivery costs as a percent of net sales and the spreading of fixed costs over a smaller sales base, partially offset by lower incentive compensation as a percent of net sales due to reduced operating profits.

Partially offset by:

Implementation of cost-cutting measures.

DREW INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

(Continued)

Improved production and procurement efficiencies.

The Company has remained profitable in this segment despite the 73 percent decline in manufactured housing industry production since 1998. The Company continues to monitor the goodwill and other intangible assets related to this segment for potential impairment. A further significant downturn in this industry could result in an impairment of the goodwill or other intangible assets of this segment.

Corporate and Other

Corporate and other expenses for the first six months and second quarter of 2007 were consistent with the comparable periods of 2006.

DREW INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

(Continued)

Other Income

Taxes

The effective tax rate for the first six months of 2007 was 38.4 percent, compared to 38.6 percent in the first six months of 2006. The effective tax rate for the second quarter of 2007 was 38.3 percent as compared to 38.7 percent for the second quarter of 2006. The effective tax rate for the full year 2006 was 38.8 percent. The decrease in the effective tax rate for 2007 is due to the Jobs Creation Act of 2004, which reduced the effective Federal tax rate on manufacturing activities by approximately 1 percent in 2006, and approximately 2 percent in 2007, as well as tax-free interest income, partially offset by a change in the composition of pre-tax income for state tax purposes.

Interest Expense, Net

The decrease in interest expense, net, for the first six months and second quarter of 2007, as compared to the prior year, was primarily due to a decrease in the average debt levels as a result of strong operating cash flows during the latter half of 2006 and the first half of 2007, which more than offset the $40 million the Company has invested in acquisitions since early 2006. In addition, for the first six months of 2007, the Company earned $0.2 million in interest income.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

The Statements of Cash Flows reflect the following for the six months ended June 30, (in thousands):

	2007			2006
Net cash flows provided by operating activities	$	43,508		$	22,592
Net cash flows used for investment activities	$	(5,963	)	$	(48,021	)
Net cash flows (used for) provided by financing activities	$	(5,769	)	$	25,689

Cash Flows from Operations

Net cash flows from operating activities in the first six months of 2007 increased by $20.9 million from the same period in 2006. The 2007 period was impacted by a concerted effort by management to reduce inventory on hand, while the traditional seasonal working capital increase was less than typical during the first six months of 2006 because of higher working capital at January 1, 2006 due to the unusually high sales levels during the fourth quarter of 2005 resulting from the sales related to the Gulf Coast hurricanes of 2005.

DREW INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

(Continued)

Cash Flows from Investing Activities:

Cash flows used for investing activities of $6.0 million in 2007 include $6.6 million for the acquisition of businesses and $5.4 million for capital expenditures, offset by proceeds of $6.1 million received from the sale of fixed assets. Capital expenditures and the acquisitions were financed with borrowings under the Company’s line of credit pursuant to the Credit Agreement (the “Line of Credit”) and cash flow from operations. Capital expenditures for 2007 are anticipated to be approximately $12 million to $15 million and are expected to be funded by cash flow from operations.

Cash flows used for investing activities of $48.0 million in the first six months of 2006 include $33.0 million for the acquisition of businesses and $16.4 million for capital expenditures, offset by proceeds of $1.3 million received from the sale of fixed assets. Capital expenditures and the acquisitions were financed with borrowings under the Company’s Line of Credit, Senior Promissory Notes and cash flow from operations.

At June 30, 2007, the Company was in the process of selling 15 facilities with an aggregate book value of $10.4 million. As of the end of July 2007, four of such properties, with an aggregate book value of $2.3 million, have either been sold or are under contract for sale, at a small aggregate gain. In addition, on July 3, 2006, the Company entered into a sale-leaseback transaction for one of its facilities in California. In connection with the sale, the Company received $1.8 million in cash and a $3.9 million purchase money mortgage bearing interest at 5 percent per annum payable monthly. The mortgage is due and payable in the fourth quarter of 2007.

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

Cash flows used for financing activities for the first six months of 2007 of $5.8 million included a net decrease in debt of $7.9 million, offset by cash flows provided by the exercise of employee stock options of $2.1 million, which includes the related tax benefits. The decrease in debt is primarily due to debt payments of $8.1 million.

Cash flows provided by financing activities for the first six months of 2006 include a net increase in debt of $25.0 million, and cash flows provided by the exercise of employee stock options of $0.7 million, which includes the related tax benefits. The increase in debt includes a net increase in the amount borrowed under the Company’s Line of Credit of $17.6 million and new Senior Promissory Notes of $15.0 million, offset by debt payments of $7.6 million. The increase in borrowings under the Company’s Line of Credit and Senior Promissory Notes was used primarily to fund acquisitions.

DREW INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

(Continued)

At June 30, 2007 and 2006, the Company had $36.3 million and $3.5 million, respectively, of cash invested in money market funds.

Borrowings under the Company’s $70.0 million Line of Credit at June 30, 2007 were $10.0 million. The Company’s excess cash was not used to pay down these borrowings under the Line of Credit, as these borrowings are associated with an interest rate swap which results in a favorable fixed interest rate of 4.4 percent. The Company also had $2.2 million in outstanding letters of credit under the Line of Credit. Availability under the Company’s Line of Credit was $57.8 million at June 30, 2007. Such availability, along with available cash and anticipated cash flows from operations, is expected to be adequate to finance the Company’s anticipated working capital and anticipated capital expenditure requirements. The maximum borrowings under the Line of Credit can be increased by $20.0 million, upon approval of the lenders.

At June 30, 2007, the Company was in compliance with all of its debt covenants and expects to remain in compliance for the next twelve months. Certain of the Company’s loan agreements contain prepayment penalties.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The Company is in compliance with the corporate governance requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the New York Stock Exchange. The Company’s governance documents and committee charters and key practices have been posted to the Company’s website (www.drewindustries.com) and are updated periodically. The website also contains, or provides direct links to, all SEC filings, press releases and investor presentations. The Company has also established a toll-free hotline (877-373-9123) to report complaints about the Company’s accounting, internal controls, auditing matters or other concerns.

In July 2007, the Company received notification from Institutional Stockholders Services, Inc., (“ISS”) a Rockville, Maryland-based independent research firm that advises institutional investors, that the Company’s corporate governance policies outranked 94.8 percent of all companies listed in the Russell 3000 index. The Company has no business relationships with ISS.

CONTINGENCIES

Additional information required by this item is included under Item 1 of Part II of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q.

DREW INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

(Continued)

INFLATION

The prices of key raw materials, consisting primarily of steel, vinyl, aluminum, glass and ABS resin are influenced by demand and other factors specific to these commodities, such as the price of oil, rather than being directly affected by inflationary pressures. Prices of certain commodities have historically been volatile. After a temporary decline in the fourth quarter of 2006, the Company received further cost increases for certain key raw materials, particularly steel and aluminum, during the early part of 2007. The Company did not experience any significant increase in its labor costs in the first six months of 2007 related to inflation.

NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

USE OF ESTIMATES

DREW INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

(Continued)

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AND RISK FACTORS

This Form 10-Q contains certain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 with respect to financial condition, results of operations, business strategies, operating efficiencies or synergies, competitive position, growth opportunities for existing products, plans and objectives of management, markets for the Company’s common stock and other matters. Statements in this Form 10-Q that are not historical facts are “forward-looking statements” for the purpose of the safe harbor provided by Section 21E of the Exchange Act and Section 27A of the Securities Act. Forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, those relating to our future business prospects, revenues, expenses and income, wherever they occur in this Form 10-Q, are necessarily estimates reflecting the best judgment of our senior management, at the time such statements were made, and involve a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those suggested by forward-looking statements. The Company does not undertake to update forward-looking statements to reflect circumstances or events that occur after the date the forward-looking statements are made. You should consider forward-looking statements, therefore, in light of various important factors, including those set forth in this Form 10-Q.

There are a number of factors, many of which are beyond the Company’s control, which could cause actual results and events to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements. These factors include pricing pressures due to domestic and foreign competition, costs and availability of raw materials (particularly steel and related components, vinyl, aluminum, glass and ABS resin), availability of retail and wholesale financing for manufactured homes, availability and costs of labor, inventory levels of retailers and manufacturers, levels of repossessed manufactured homes, the disposition into the market by FEMA by sale or otherwise of RVs or manufactured homes purchased by FEMA in connection with natural disasters, changes in zoning regulations for manufactured homes, the decline in the manufactured housing industry, the financial condition of our customers, retention of significant customers, interest rates, oil and gasoline prices, the outcome of litigation, and adverse weather conditions impacting retail sales. In addition, national and regional economic conditions and consumer confidence may affect the retail sale of recreational vehicles and manufactured homes.

DREW INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED

Item 3.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The Company is exposed to changes in interest rates primarily as a result of its financing activities.

On October 18, 2004, the Company entered into a five-year interest rate swap with KeyBank National Association with an initial notional amount of $20.0 million from which it will receive periodic payments at the 3 month LIBOR rate (5.36 percent at June 30, 2007 based upon the May 15, 2007 reset date), and make periodic payments at a fixed rate of 3.35 percent, with settlement and rate reset dates every November 15, February 15, May 15 and August 15. The notional amount of the interest rate swap decreases by $1.0 million on each quarterly reset date. At June 30, 2007, the notional amount was $10.0 million. The fair value of the swap was zero at inception, and $0.3 million at June 30, 2007. The Company has designated this swap as a cash flow hedge of certain borrowings under the line of credit pursuant to the Credit Agreement and recognized the effective portion of the change in fair value as part of other comprehensive income, with the ineffective portion, which was insignificant, recognized in earnings currently.

At June 30, 2007, the Company had $21.8 million of fixed rate debt plus $22.9 million outstanding under the two interest rate swaps. Assuming there is a decrease of 100 basis points in the interest rate for borrowings of a similar nature subsequent to June 30, 2007, which the Company becomes unable to capitalize on in the short-term as a result of the structure of its fixed rate financing, future cash flows would be $0.4 million lower per annum than if the fixed rate financing could be obtained at current market rates.

At June 30, 2007, the Company had $3.1 million of variable rate debt, excluding the $22.9 million outstanding under the two interest rate swaps. Assuming there is an increase of 100 basis points in the interest rate for borrowings under these variable rate loans subsequent to June 30, 2007, and outstanding borrowings of $3.1 million, future cash flows would be reduced by less than $0.1 million per annum.

In addition, the Company is periodically exposed to changes in interest rates as a result of temporary investments in money market funds; however, such investing activity is not material to the Company’s financial position, results of operations, or cash flow.

If the actual change in interest rates is substantially different than 100 basis points, or the outstanding borrowings change significantly, the net impact of interest rate risk on the Company’s cash flow may be materially different than that disclosed above. Additional information required by this item is included under the caption “Inflation” in the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations section of this Report.

DREW INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED

Item 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Company’s Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure, in accordance with the definition of “disclosure controls and procedures” in Rule 13a-15 under the Exchange Act. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, cannot provide absolute assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. Management included in its evaluation the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. The Company continually evaluates its system of internal controls over financial reporting to determine if changes are appropriate based upon changes in the Company’s operations or the business environment in which it operates.

As of the end of the period covered by this Form 10-Q, the Company performed an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures. Based on the foregoing, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

Changes in Internal Controls

There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended June 30, 2007, or subsequent to the date the Company completed its evaluation, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

During 2005, one of the Company’s subsidiaries installed new computer software and has subsequently implemented certain functions of the new software. Over the last few years, the internal controls of the Company have incrementally been strengthened due both to the new software, and business process changes. The Company anticipates that it will implement certain additional functionalities of the new computer software to further strengthen the Company’s internal controls.

DREW INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1 - LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Moreover, Kinro believes that, because test results received by Kinro confirm that it is in compliance with HUD safety standards, no remedial action is required or appropriate.

If plaintiff nevertheless pursues its claims, protracted litigation could result, and the outcome of such litigation cannot be predicted.

Item 1A - RISK FACTORS

There have been no material changes to the matters discussed in Part I, Item 1A - Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 13, 2007, except as noted below.

Sales or other dispositions by FEMA of RVs or manufactured homes could cause a decline in the demand for our products.

Sales or other dispositions by FEMA of RVs and manufactured homes purchased by FEMA for use by victims of the Gulf Coast hurricanes may cause manufacturers of RVs and manufactured homes to reduce production of new RVs and manufactured homes, which could cause a decline in the demand for our products.

Item 6 - EXHIBITS

a) Exhibits as required by item 601 of Regulation 8-K:

31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Exhibit 31.1 is filed herewith.

31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Exhibit 31.2 is filed herewith.

32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. Exhibit 32.1is filed herewith.

32.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. Exhibit 32.2 is filed herewith.

DREW INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


	DREW INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED Registrant

		/s/ Fredric M. Zinn
		Fredric M. Zinn Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

August 9, 2007