Unassociated Document
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
DC 20549
FORM
10-K
(Mark One)
þ
|
ANNUAL
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
|
|
|
For
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009
|
|
OR
|
|
|
¨
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
|
|
|
For
the transaction period from __________________ to
__________________
|
Commission
File Number: 0-25248
CONSOLIDATED
WATER CO. LTD.
(Exact
name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
CAYMAN ISLANDS
|
|
N/A
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
incorporation
or organization)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regatta
Office Park
|
|
|
Windward
Three, 4th Floor, West Bay Road
|
|
|
P.O.
Box 1114
|
|
|
Grand Cayman, KY1-1102, Cayman
Islands
|
|
N/A
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip
Code)
|
Registrant’s
Telephone number, including area code: (345) 945-4277
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title
of each class:
|
|
Name
of each exchange on which registered:
|
Common
Stock, $.60 Par Value
|
|
The
NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (NASDAQ Global Select
Market)
|
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in
Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes ¨ No
þ
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to
Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
Yes ¨ No
þ
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days. Yes þ No
¨
Indicate
by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this 10-K or any amendments to this
Form 10-K. [Not Applicable]
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See
the definition of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller
reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large
accelerated filer ¨
|
Accelerated
filer þ
|
Non-accelerated
filer ¨
|
Smaller
reporting company ¨
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No
þ
The
aggregate market value of common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant,
based on the closing sales price for the registrant’s common shares, as reported
on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on June 30, 2009, was
$230,334,831.
As of
March 10, 2010,
14,541,878 shares of the registrant’s common shares were
outstanding.
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE: None
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
Section
|
|
Description
|
|
Page
|
Cautionary
Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
|
|
3
|
PART
I
|
|
|
|
4
|
Item
1.
|
|
Business
|
|
4
|
Item
1A.
|
|
Risk
Factors
|
|
21
|
Item
1B.
|
|
Unresolved
Staff Comments
|
|
28
|
Item
2.
|
|
Properties
|
|
28
|
Item
3.
|
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
|
31
|
Item
4.
|
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
|
31
|
PART
II
|
|
|
|
31
|
Item
5.
|
|
Market
for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities
|
|
31
|
Item
6.
|
|
Selected
Financial Data
|
|
34
|
Item
7.
|
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
|
34
|
Item
7A.
|
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk
|
|
48
|
Item
8.
|
|
Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data
|
|
49
|
Item
9.
|
|
Changes
in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial
Disclosure
|
|
87
|
Item
9A.
|
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
|
87
|
PART
III
|
|
|
|
88
|
Item
10.
|
|
Directors,
Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
|
|
88
|
Item
11.
|
|
Executive
Compensation
|
|
94
|
Item
12.
|
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related
Stockholder Matters
|
|
115
|
Item
13.
|
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director
Independence
|
|
118
|
Item
14.
|
|
Principal
Accounting Fees and Services
|
|
118
|
PART
IV
|
|
|
|
119
|
Item
15.
|
|
Exhibits,
Financial Statement Schedules
|
|
119
|
SIGNATURES
|
|
|
|
120
|
CAUTIONARY
NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This
Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements, including but
not limited to, statements regarding our future revenues, future plans,
objectives, expectations and events, assumptions and estimates. Forward-looking
statements can be identified by use of the words or phrases “will”, “will likely
result”, “are expected to”, “will continue”, “estimate”, “project”, “potential”,
“believe”, “plan”, “anticipate”, “expect”, “intend”, or similar expressions and
variations of such words. Statements that are not historical facts are based on
our current expectations, beliefs, assumptions, estimates, forecasts and
projections for our business and the industry and markets related to our
business.
The
forward-looking statements contained in this report are not guarantees of future
performance and involve certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions which are
difficult to predict. Actual outcomes and results may differ materially from
what is expressed in such forward-looking statements. Important factors which
may affect these actual outcomes and results include, without limitation,
tourism and weather conditions in the areas we service, scheduled new
construction within our operating areas, the economies of the U.S. and the areas
we service, regulatory matters, availability of capital to repay debt and for
expansion of our operations, and other factors, including those set forth under
Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” in this Annual Report.
The
forward-looking statements in this Annual Report speak as of its date. We
expressly disclaim any obligation or undertaking to update or revise any
forward-looking statement contained in this Annual Report to reflect any change
in our expectations with regard thereto or any change in events, conditions or
circumstances on which any forward-looking statement is based, except as may be
required by law.
Unless
otherwise indicated, references to “we,” “our,” “ours” and “us” refer to
Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. and its subsidiaries.
Note Regarding Currency and Exchange
Rates.
Unless
otherwise indicated, all references to “$” or “US$” are to United States
dollars.
The
exchange rate for conversion of Cayman Island dollars (CI$) into US$, as
determined by the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority, has been fixed since April
1974 at US$1.20 per CI$1.00.
The
exchange rate for conversion of Belize dollars (BZE$) into US$, as determined by
the Central Bank of Belize, has been fixed since 1976 at US $0.50 per
BZE$1.00.
The
exchange rate for conversion of Bahamas dollars (B$) into US$, as determined by
the Central Bank of The Bahamas, has been fixed since 1973 at US$1.00 per
B$1.00.
The
official currency of the British Virgin Islands is the United States
dollar.
The
exchange rate for conversion of Bermuda dollars (BMD$) into US$ as determined by
the Bermuda Monetary Authority, has been fixed since 1970 at US$1.00 per
BMD$1.00.
PART
I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Overview
We
develop and operate seawater desalination plants and water distribution systems
in areas where naturally occurring supplies of potable water are scarce or
nonexistent. Through our subsidiaries and affiliates, we operate 16 reverse
osmosis desalination plants and provide the following services to our customers
in the Cayman Islands, the Bahamas, Belize, the British Virgin Islands and
Bermuda:
|
•
|
Retail Water Operations.
We produce and supply water to end-users, including residential,
commercial and government customers in the Cayman Islands under an
exclusive retail license issued by the government to provide water in two
of the most populated and rapidly developing areas in the Cayman Islands.
In 2009, our retail water operations generated approximately 40% of our
consolidated revenues.
|
|
•
|
Bulk Water Operations.
We produce and supply water to government-owned distributors in the
Cayman Islands, Belize and the Bahamas. In 2009, our bulk water operations
generated approximately 45% of our consolidated
revenues.
|
|
•
|
Services Operations. We
provide engineering and management services for desalination projects,
including designing and constructing desalination plants and managing and
operating desalination plants owned by other companies. In 2009, our
services operations generated approximately 15% of our consolidated
revenues.
|
|
•
|
Affiliate Operations.
Our affiliate, Ocean Conversion (BVI) Ltd. (“OC-BVI”), produces and
supplies bulk water to the British Virgin Islands Water and Sewerage
Department. We account for our interests in OC-BVI using the equity method
of accounting and do not consolidate OC-BVI’s operating results in our
consolidated financial statements. Our affiliate, Consolidated Water
(Bermuda) Limited, has constructed and sold a plant to the Bermuda
government and is presently operating this plant on behalf of the Bermuda
government. We expect to continue to manage the plant on behalf
of the Bermuda government into mid
2011.
|
As of
December 31, 2009, the number of plants we, or our affiliates, manage in each
country and the production capacities of these plants are as
follows:
Location
|
|
Plants
|
|
|
Capacity
(1)
|
|
Cayman
Islands
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
Bahamas
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
Belize
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
British
Virgin Islands
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
Bermuda
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
Total
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
24.3 |
|
(1)
|
In
millions of U.S. gallons per day.
|
Strategy
Our
strategy is to provide water services in areas where the supply of potable water
is scarce and we believe the production of potable water by reverse osmosis
desalination is, or will be, profitable. We have focused on the Caribbean basin
and adjacent areas as our principal market because they possess the following
characteristics which make them attractive for our business:
|
•
|
little
or no naturally occurring fresh
water;
|
|
•
|
limited
regulations and taxes allowing for higher
returns;
|
|
•
|
a
large proportion of tourist properties, which historically have generated
higher volume sales than residential properties;
and
|
|
•
|
growing
population and tourism levels.
|
Although
we are currently focused primarily on these areas, we believe that our potential
market includes any location with a demand for, but a limited supply of, potable
water. The desalination of seawater is the most widely used process for
producing fresh water in areas with an insufficient natural supply. In addition,
in many locations, desalination is the only commercially viable means to expand
the existing water supply. We believe that our experience in the development and
operation of reverse osmosis desalination plants provides us with the
capabilities to successfully expand our operations.
Key
elements of our strategy include:
• Maximizing the benefits of our
exclusive retail license on Grand Cayman. We plan to continue to increase
operations within our exclusive retail license service area through organic
growth and possible further investments, if opportunities become
available.
• Expanding our existing operations
in the Cayman Islands, Belize and The Bahamas. We plan to continue
to seek new water supply agreements and licenses and focus on renewing our
existing service contracts with extended terms and greater production
levels.
• Penetrating new markets where there
is demand for potable water and where we believe production would be
profitable. We plan to continue to seek opportunities to expand our
operations into new markets including, but not limited to, markets throughout
the Caribbean basin, Central America and South America. We may pursue these
opportunities either on our own or through joint ventures and strategic
alliances.
• Broadening our existing and future
operations into complementary services. We continue to consider and
pursue opportunities to leverage our water-related expertise to enter
complementary service industries, such as wastewater management.
Our
Company
We
conduct our operations in the Cayman Islands, The Bahamas, the British Virgin
Islands, Belize, Bermuda and the United States through the following principal
operating subsidiaries and affiliates:
|
•
|
Cayman
Water Company Limited (“Cayman Water”). In 1998, we
established Cayman Water, which operates under an exclusive retail license
granted by the Cayman Islands government to provide water to customers
within a prescribed service area on Grand Cayman that includes the Seven
Mile Beach and West Bay areas, two of the three most populated areas in
the Cayman Islands. The only non-government owned public water utility on
Grand Cayman, Cayman Water owns and operates four desalination plants on
Grand Cayman.
|
|
•
|
Ocean
Conversion (Cayman) Limited (“OC-Cayman”). OC-Cayman provides bulk
water under various licenses and agreements to the Water Authority-Cayman,
a government-owned utility and regulatory agency, which distributes the
water to properties located outside our exclusive retail license service
area in Grand Cayman. OC-Cayman operates four desalination plants owned by
the Water Authority-Cayman.
|
|
•
|
Consolidated
Water (Bahamas) Limited (“CW-Bahamas”). We own a 90.9% equity
interest in CW-Bahamas, which provides bulk water under long-term
contracts to the Water and Sewerage Corporation of The Bahamas, a
government agency. CW-Bahamas’ operates our largest desalination plant.
CW-Bahamas pays fees to two of our other subsidiaries for certain
administrative services.
|
|
•
|
Consolidated
Water (Belize) Limited (“CW-Belize”). CW-Belize, (formerly Belize
Water Limited), has an exclusive contract to provide bulk water to Belize
Water Services Ltd., a water distributor that serves residential,
commercial and tourist properties in Ambergris Caye,
Belize.
|
|
•
|
Aquilex,
Inc. This subsidiary, a United States company, provides financial,
engineering and supply chain management support services to our
subsidiaries and affiliates.
|
|
•
|
Ocean
Conversion (BVI) Ltd. (“OC-BVI”). We own 50% of the voting stock of
our affiliate, OC-BVI, a British Virgin Islands company, which sells bulk
water on a month-to-month basis to the Government of The British Virgin
Islands Water and Sewage Department. We own an overall 43.5% equity
interest in OC-BVI’s profits and certain profit sharing rights that raise
our effective interest in OC-BVI’s profits to approximately 45%. OC-BVI
also pays our subsidiary DesalCo Limited fees for certain engineering and
administrative services.
|
|
•
|
DesalCo
Limited (“DesalCo”). A Cayman Islands company, DesalCo provides
management, engineering and construction services for desalination
projects.
|
|
•
|
Consolidated
Water (Bermuda) Limited (“CW-Bermuda”). In January 2007, our
affiliate, Consolidated Water (Bermuda) Limited (“CW-Bermuda”) entered
into a design, build, sale and operating agreement with the Government of
Bermuda for a desalination plant to be built in two phases at Tynes Bay
along the northern coast of Bermuda. Under the agreement, CW-Bermuda
constructed and has been operating the plant since the second quarter of
2009. We expect CW-Bermuda to operate the plant through
mid-2011. We have entered into a management services agreement
with CW-Bermuda for the design, construction and operation of the Tynes
Bay plant, under which we receive fees for direct services, purchasing
activities and proprietary technology. Although we own only 40% of the
common shares of CW-Bermuda, we consolidate its results in our
consolidated financial statements as we are its primary financial
beneficiary.
|
Our
Operations
We have
three principal business segments: retail water operations, bulk water
operations and services operations. Our retail water operations supply water to
end-users, including residential, commercial and government customers. Through
our bulk water operations we supply water to distributors and commercial
suppliers, including governments and wholesalers. Our retail and bulk operations
serve customers in the Cayman Islands, Belize, the British Virgin Islands and
The Bahamas. Our services operations provide engineering and management
services, which include designing and constructing desalination plants, and
managing and operating plants owned by other companies.
For
fiscal year 2009, our retail water, bulk water and service operations generated
approximately 40%, 45% and 15%, respectively, of our consolidated revenues. For
information about our business segments and geographical information about our
operating revenues and long-lived assets, see Note 17 to our audited
consolidated financial statements at Item 8 of this Annual Report.
Retail
Water Operations
For
fiscal years 2009, 2008 and 2007, our retail water operations accounted for
approximately 40%, 34% and 41%, respectively, of our consolidated revenues. This
business in the Cayman Islands produces and supplies water to end-users,
including residential, commercial and government customers.
We sell
water through our retail operations to a variety of residential and commercial
customers through our wholly-owned subsidiary Cayman Water, which operates under
an exclusive license issued to us by the Cayman Islands government under The
Water Production and Supply Law of 1979. Pursuant to the license, we have the
exclusive right to produce potable water and distribute it by pipeline to our
licensed service area which consists of the Seven Mile Beach and West Bay areas
of Grand Cayman, two of the three most populated areas in the Cayman
Islands.
Under our
exclusive license, we pay a royalty to the government of 7.5% of our gross
retail water sales revenues (excluding energy adjustments). The selling prices
of water sold to our customers, except for the prices under our agreements with
the Cayman Beach Suites Hotel, Britannia Golf Course and North Sound Golf Club,
are set out under the license and vary depending upon the type and location of
the customer and the monthly volume of water purchased. The license provides for
an automatic adjustment for inflation or deflation on an annual basis, subject
to temporary limited exceptions, and an automatic adjustment for the cost of
electricity on a monthly basis. The Water Authority-Cayman, on behalf of the
government, reviews and confirms the calculations of the price adjustments for
inflation and electricity costs. If we want to adjust our prices for any reason
other than inflation or electricity costs, we have to request prior approval of
the Cabinet of the Cayman Islands government. Disputes regarding price
adjustments are referred to arbitration. Our last price increase, requested in
June 1985, was granted in full.
Under our
exclusive license, we must provide any requested piped water service within our
exclusive retail license service area that is commercially feasible, as
determined by the Cabinet of the Cayman Islands government. Where service is not
considered commercially feasible, we may require the potential customer to
contribute toward the capital costs of pipe-laying. We then repay these
contributions to the customer, without interest, by way of a 10% discount on
future billings for water sales until this advance in aid of construction has
been repaid.
Unless
renewed, our exclusive license expires in July 2010. We
began negotiations to renew this license in 2008. Unless we are in
default under the license, and upon expiration of the license, the government
may not grant a license to any other party without first offering the license to
us on terms that are no less favorable than those which the government offers to
a third party. We are not, nor have we been in the past, in default under the
retail license.
During
our retail license renewal negotiations conducted with representatives of the
Cayman Island government during the fourth quarter of 2009, we were informed
that the Cayman Island government seeks to restructure the terms of our retail
license to employ a “rate of return on invested capital model’ similar to that
governing the sale of water to most U.S. municipalities. We have
formally objected to the implementation of a “rate of return on invested capital
model” on the basis that we believe that such a model would not promote the
efficient operation of our water utility, and could ultimately increase water
rates to our customers. We believe such a model, if ultimately
implemented, could significantly reduce the operating income we have
historically generated from our retail license.
Facilities
Our
retail operations in the Cayman Islands currently produce potable water at four
reverse osmosis seawater conversion plants in Grand Cayman located at our Abel
Castillo Water Works (“ACWW”, formerly Governor’s Harbour), West Bay and
Britannia sites. We own the land for our ACWW and West Bay plants and have
entered into a lease for the land for our Britannia plant which has more than 18
years remaining. The current production capacity of the two plants located at
ACWW is 2.2 million U.S. gallons of water per day. This production capacity was
expanded on a temporary basis during 2007 from the original capacity of 1.2
million U.S. gallons per day. The temporary capacity was replaced by
permanent production capacity which came online at the end of
2009. The production capacity of the Britannia plant is 715,000 U.S.
gallons of water per day. The Britannia plant was destroyed by Hurricane Ivan in
September 2004 but was rebuilt and placed back in operation in October 2005. The
production capacity of the West Bay plant is 910,000 U.S. gallons of water per
day; we completed an expansion of the production capacity of this plant from
710,000 U.S. gallons of water per day in January 2008. Since the ACWW and West
Bay plants began production of water and the Britannia plant was rebuilt, these
plants have consistently been capable of operating at or near their rated
capacity.
Electricity
to our plants is supplied by Caribbean Utilities Co. Ltd., a publicly traded
utility company. At all four plant sites from which we supply water to our
distribution pipeline, we maintain diesel driven, standby generators with
sufficient capacity to operate our distribution pumps and other essential
equipment during any temporary interruptions in electricity supply. Standby
generation capacity is also maintained at our West Bay Plant and ACWW plant to
operate a portion of the water production capacity as well.
In the
event of an emergency, our distribution system is connected to the distribution
system of the Water Authority-Cayman. In prior years in order to efficiently
maintain our equipment, we have purchased water from the Water Authority-Cayman
for brief periods of time. We have also sold potable water to the Water
Authority-Cayman.
Our
pipeline system in the Cayman Islands covers the Seven Mile Beach and West Bay
areas of Grand Cayman and consists of approximately 71 miles of
polyvinylchloride and polyethylene pipeline. We extend our distribution system
periodically as property developments are completed. We have a main pipe loop
covering a major part of the Seven Mile Beach area. We place extensions of
smaller diameter pipe off our main pipe to service new developments in our
service area. This system of building branches from the main pipe keeps
construction costs low and allows us to provide service to new areas in a timely
manner. During 2009, we completed a number of small pipeline extensions into
newly developed properties within our distribution system. Developers are
responsible for laying the pipeline within their developments at their own cost,
but in accordance with our specifications. When a development is completed, the
developer then transfers operation and maintenance of the pipeline to
us.
We have a
comprehensive layout of our pipeline system, superimposed upon digital aerial
photographs, which is maintained using a computer aided design system. This
system is interconnected with a computer generated hydraulic model, which allows
us to accurately locate pipes and equipment in need of repair and maintenance.
It also helps us to plan extensions and upgrades.
Customers
We enter
into standard contracts with hotels, condominiums and other properties located
in our existing licensed area to provide potable water. In the Seven Mile Beach
area, our primary customers are the hotels and condominium complexes that serve
the tourist industry. In the West Bay area, our primary customers are
residential homes.
Development
continues to take place on Grand Cayman, and particularly in our licensed area,
to accommodate both the growing local population and the tourism market. Because
our license requires us to supply water to developments in our licensed area,
the planning department of the Cayman Islands government routinely advises us of
proposed developments. This advance notice allows us to manage our production
capacity to meet anticipated demand. We believe that we have a sufficient supply
of water to meet the foreseeable future demand.
We bill
our customers on a monthly basis based on metered consumption and bills are
typically collected within 30 to 35 days after the billing date and receivables
not collected within 45 days subject the customer to disconnection from water
service. In 2009, 2008 and 2007, bad debts represented less than 1% of our total
annual retail sales. Customers who have had their service disconnected must pay
re-connection charges.
The
following table sets forth our approximate total number of customer connections
and the volume of water sold in the Cayman Islands as of, and for the indicated
years ended December 31:
Retail
Water Customer Connections and Volume of Water Sold
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
Number
of Customer Connections
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
4,600 |
|
|
|
4,600 |
|
|
|
4,300 |
|
|
|
3,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volume
of Water Sold (U.S. Gallons, In Thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
543,658 |
|
|
|
534,614 |
|
|
|
554,087 |
|
|
|
562,702 |
|
|
|
427,439 |
|
Residential
|
|
|
218,662 |
|
|
|
211,090 |
|
|
|
202,988 |
|
|
|
173,665 |
|
|
|
157,924 |
|
Government
|
|
|
41,714 |
|
|
|
25,967 |
|
|
|
45,623 |
|
|
|
12,789 |
|
|
|
8,929 |
|
Total
|
|
|
804,034 |
|
|
|
771,671 |
|
|
|
802,698 |
|
|
|
749,156 |
|
|
|
594,292 |
|
The table
above does not precisely represent our actual number of customers or facilities
that we serve. For example, in hotels and condominiums, we may only have a
single customer who is the operator of the hotel or the condominium while
supplying water to all of the units within that hotel or condominium
development. Historically, demand on our pipeline distribution has varied
throughout the year. Demand depends upon the number of tourists visiting and the
amount of rainfall during any particular time of the year. In general, the
majority of tourists come from the United States during the winter
months.
Before
1991, any owner of property within our licensed area could install water-making
equipment for its own use. Since 1991, that option is only available to private
residences, although water plants in existence prior to 1991 can be maintained
but not replaced or expanded. We know of only one plant that continues to
operate under such exemption at a hotel within our license area and we believe
that the amount of water produced by this plant is insignificant to our
operations.
Retail
Water Demand and Average Sales Prices
The table
below sets forth the total volume of water we supplied to our retail water
customers on a quarterly basis for the indicated years ended December
31:
Retail
Water Total Volume by Quarter
(U.S.
Gallons, In Thousands)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
First
Quarter
|
|
|
217,890 |
|
|
|
203,899 |
|
|
|
215,044 |
|
|
|
207,572 |
|
|
|
145,295 |
|
Second
Quarter
|
|
|
214,854 |
|
|
|
213,679 |
|
|
|
219,191 |
|
|
|
211,772 |
|
|
|
158,474 |
|
Third
Quarter
|
|
|
194,076 |
|
|
|
194,971 |
|
|
|
187,796 |
|
|
|
174,490 |
|
|
|
136,784 |
|
Fourth
Quarter
|
|
|
177,214 |
|
|
|
159,122 |
|
|
|
180,667 |
|
|
|
155,322 |
|
|
|
153,739 |
|
Total
|
|
|
804,034 |
|
|
|
771,671 |
|
|
|
802,698 |
|
|
|
749,156 |
|
|
|
594,292 |
|
Our
average sales prices of potable water sold to our retail water customers for the
indicated years ended December 31 were:
Retail
Water Average Sales Prices
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Average
Sales Price Per 1,000 U.S. Gallons
|
|
$ |
28.90 |
|
|
$ |
28.99 |
|
|
$ |
27.69 |
|
Bulk
Water Operations
For
fiscal years 2009, 2008 and 2007, our bulk water operations accounted for
approximately 45%, 46% and 45%, respectively, of our consolidated revenues and
are comprised of businesses in the Cayman Islands, The Bahamas and Belize. These
businesses produce potable water from seawater and sell this water to
governments and private customers.
Bulk
Water Operations in the Cayman Islands
We sell
bulk water in the Cayman Islands through our wholly-owned subsidiary
OC-Cayman.
Facilities
We
operate four reverse osmosis seawater conversion plants in Grand Cayman that are
owned by the Water Authority-Cayman: the Red Gate Road, Lower Valley, North
Sound and North Side Water Works plants, which have production capacities of
approximately 1.3 million, 1.1 million, 1.6 million and 2.4 million U.S. gallons
of water per day, respectively. The North Side Water Works (“NSWW”) plant was
commissioned in June 2009. The North Sound plant operating capacity
was expanded from approximately 0.8 million U.S. gallons to 1.6 million U.S.
gallons of water per day during 2007. The Red Gate plant was temporarily
de-commissioned in December 2009 in order to carry out extensive rehabilitative
and upgrade work to the plant. We expect the Red Gate plant to be
re-commissioned in April 2010. The plants that we operate for the
Water Authority-Cayman are located on land owned by the Cayman Islands
government.
Customers
We
provide bulk water on a take-or-pay basis to the Water Authority-Cayman, a
government owned utility and regulatory agency, under various licenses and
agreements. The Water Authority-Cayman in turn distributes that water to
properties in the parts of Grand Cayman that are outside of our retail licensed
area. During 2009, we supplied the Water Authority-Cayman with approximately 1.1
billion U.S. gallons of water.
In
January 2001, we were granted a 7-year extension, effective December 2001, to
the water supply license by the Cayman Islands government to supply desalinated
water from the Red Gate Road plant through November 2008. Under the terms of the
water production and supply license between OC-Cayman and the government of the
Cayman Islands, we are allowed to use the property and the plant to produce
approximately 1.3 million U.S. gallons of desalinated water per day for sale to
the Water Authority-Cayman. On November 30, 2008, the Water Authority-Cayman
took possession of the plant for no consideration, in accordance with the terms
of the water production and supply license, and the license was also extended
for a period of one year, during which time we are required to operate and
maintain the plant. The plant was originally powered only by electricity, but
was upgraded in 1994 to include diesel driven high-pressure pumps. In August
2008, the Water Authority-Cayman contracted with us to convert the high-pressure
pumps back to electrical power and make other modifications and improvements to
the plant. This work is expected to be completed in April 2010, for which
OC-Cayman will obtain a seven year license and operating agreement for the
plant.
In
December 2001, we were granted a seven-year water supply license, effective
November 2002, by the Cayman Islands government to supply desalinated water from
the North Sound plant through November 2009. Under the terms of this license
OC-Cayman is obligated to deliver to the Water Authority-Cayman the amount of
water it demands or 713,000 U.S. gallons of water per day on average each month,
whichever is less. In January 2007, we were granted an extension to this water
supply license for a period of seven years by the Cayman Island government,
effective on April 1, 2007. Under the terms of this extension, we are obligated
to deliver to the Water Authority-Cayman the amount of water it demands from the
North Sound Plant or 1.43 million U.S. gallons per day, whichever is
less.
In August
2005, we were granted a seven-year extension to the water supply license, with
effect from January 2006, by the Cayman Islands government to supply desalinated
water from the Lower Valley plant through January 2013. Under the terms of this
license, we increased the capacity of the Lower Valley plant to 1.1 million U.S.
gallons of water per day in exchange for an increase in the capital component of
the total price we charge for the water produced by the plant.
On March
11, 2008, we signed a ten-year agreement with the Water Authority-Cayman to
finance, design, build and operate a seawater reverse osmosis water production
plant at their NSWW site on Grand Cayman. Under the terms of this license,
OC-Cayman is obligated to deliver to the Water Authority-Cayman the amount of
water it demands or 2.14 million U.S. gallons of water per day on average each
month, whichever is less. The NSWW plant was completed in June 2009 and has a
production capacity of 2.4 million U.S. gallons per day.
Bulk
Water Operations in Belize
In
Belize, we sell bulk water through our wholly-owned subsidiary
CW-Belize.
Facilities
We own
the reverse osmosis seawater conversion plant in Belize and lease the land on
which our plant is located from the Belize government at an annual rent of
BZE$1.00. The lease, which was entered into in April 1993 and extended in
January 2004, expires in April 2026. The production capacity of the plant is
550,000 U.S. gallons of water per day.
Electricity
to our plant is supplied by Belize Electricity Limited. At the plant site, we
maintain a diesel driven, standby generator with sufficient capacity to operate
our water production equipment during any temporary interruption in the
electricity supply. Feed water for the reverse osmosis units is drawn from deep
wells with associated pumps on the property. Reject water is discharged into
brine wells on the property at a level below that of the feed water
intakes.
Customers
We are
the exclusive provider of water in Ambergris Caye, Belize to Belize Water
Services Ltd. (“BWSL”), which distributes the water through its own pipeline
system to residential, commercial and tourist properties. BWSL distributes our
water primarily to residential properties, small hotels, and businesses that
serve the tourist market. The base price of water supplied, and adjustments
thereto, are determined by the terms of the contract, which provides for annual
adjustments based upon the movement in the government price indices specified in
the contract, as well as monthly adjustments for changes in the cost of diesel
fuel and electricity. Demand is less cyclical than in our other locations due to
a higher proportion of residential to tourist demand. During 2009, we supplied
BWSL with 151.7 million U.S. gallons of water.
We have
an exclusive 23-year contract with BWSL to supply a minimum of 1.75 million U.S.
gallons of water per week, or upon demand up to 2.1 million U.S. gallons per
week, on a take or pay basis. This contract terminates on March 23, 2026. BWSL
has the right, with six months advance notice to us before the termination date,
to renew the contract for a further 25-year period on the same terms and
conditions.
On
October 3, 2005, a controlling interest in BWSL was sold back to the Belize
government. This transaction effectively reversed the 2001 privatization of
BWSL. This change in control of our customer has not affected our contractual
arrangement with BWSL.
Bulk
Water Operations in The Bahamas
In The
Bahamas, we sell bulk water through our majority-owned subsidiary,
CW-Bahamas.
Facilities
We
currently supply bulk water in The Bahamas from our Windsor, Blue Hills and
Bimini plants. We supply water from our Windsor plant under the terms of a
15-year water supply agreement dated May 7, 1996 effective March 1998. In
October 2005, we temporarily expanded this plant’s capacity from 2.6 to 4.1
million U.S. gallons per day. During August 2006 we relocated some of the
portable reverse osmosis units used to expand our Windsor plant to our retail
water operations in the Cayman Islands, reducing our Windsor plant production
capacity to 3.1 million U.S. gallons per day. We supply water from our Blue
Hills plant under the terms of a twenty-year water supply agreement dated May
20, 2005, effective July 2006. The Blue Hills plant is capable of producing 7.2
million U.S. gallons of potable water per day, and is our largest seawater
conversion facility to date. The Bimini plant has a capacity of
115,000 U.S gallons per day.
Electricity
to our plants is supplied by Bahamas Electricity Corporation. We maintain a
standby generator with sufficient capacity to operate essential equipment at our
Windsor and Blue Hills plants and are able to produce water with these plants
during any temporary interruptions in the electricity supply.
Feed
water for the reverse osmosis unit is drawn from deep wells with associated
pumps on the property. Reject water is discharged into brine wells on the
property at a deeper level than the feed water intakes.
Customers
We
provide bulk water to the Water and Sewerage Corporation of The Bahamas (“WSC”),
which distributes the water through its own pipeline system to residential,
commercial and tourist properties on the Island of New Providence. During 2009,
CW-Bahamas supplied WSC with approximately 3.1 billion U.S. gallons of
water.
We are
required to provide the WSC with at least 16.8 million U.S. gallons per week of
potable water from our Windsor plant, and the WSC has contracted to purchase at
least that amount from us on a take-or-pay basis. This water supply agreement
expires on the later of March 1, 2013 or after the plant has produced
approximately 13.1 billion U.S. gallons of water. At the conclusion of the
initial term, the WSC has the option to:
|
•
|
extend
the term for an additional five years at a rate to be
negotiated;
|
|
•
|
exercise
a right of first refusal to purchase any materials, equipment and
facilities that CW-Bahamas intends to remove from the site, and negotiate
a purchase price with CW-Bahamas;
or
|
|
•
|
require
CW-Bahamas to remove all materials, equipment and facilities from the
site.
|
Within
the past three years, we have incurred penalties relating to the Windsor plant
for not meeting diesel fuel and electricity efficiencies specified in our water
sale agreement with the WSC. These penalties totaled $63,433, $112,622, and
$436,184 in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. We have undertaken a program to
replace certain equipment prone to repetitive failure, and in 2008 successfully
completed a program which significantly reduced the adverse impact on our
operations of the fouling tendency of the feed water to the plant.
We are
required to provide the WSC with at least 33.6 million U.S. gallons per week of
potable water from the Blue Hills plant, and the WSC has contracted to purchase
at least that amount from us on a take-or-pay basis. This water supply agreement
expires on the later of July 26, 2026 or after the plant has produced 35.0
billion U.S. gallons of water. At the conclusion of the initial term, the WSC
has the option to:
|
•
|
extend
the term for an additional five years at a rate to be
negotiated;
|
|
•
|
exercise
a right of first refusal to purchase any materials, equipment and
facilities that CW-Bahamas intends to remove from the site, and negotiate
a purchase price with CW-Bahamas;
or
|
|
•
|
require
CW-Bahamas to remove all materials, equipment and facilities from the
site.
|
Bulk
Water Demand and Average Sales Prices
The table
below sets forth the total volume of water we supplied to our bulk water
customers on a quarterly basis for the indicated years ended December
31:
Bulk
Water Total Volume By Quarter
(U.S.
Gallons, In Thousands)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
First
Quarter
|
|
|
1,086,979 |
|
|
|
1,066,238 |
|
|
|
1,101,720 |
|
|
|
585,297 |
|
|
|
441,498 |
|
Second
Quarter
|
|
|
1,087,330 |
|
|
|
1,088,372 |
|
|
|
1,079,858 |
|
|
|
684,452 |
|
|
|
456,625 |
|
Third
Quarter
|
|
|
1,119,447 |
|
|
|
1,046,255 |
|
|
|
1,070,677 |
|
|
|
1,040,096 |
|
|
|
442,404 |
|
Fourth
Quarter
|
|
|
1,080,275 |
|
|
|
1,043,686 |
|
|
|
1,112,370 |
|
|
|
1,044,701 |
|
|
|
506,892 |
|
Total
|
|
|
4,374,031 |
|
|
|
4,244,551 |
|
|
|
4,364,625 |
|
|
|
3,354,546 |
|
|
|
1,847,419 |
|
Our
average sales prices of potable water sold to our bulk water customers for the
indicated years ended December 31 were as follows:
Bulk
Water Average Sales Prices
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Average
Sales Price Per 1,000 U.S. Gallons
|
|
$ |
5.92 |
|
|
$ |
7.10 |
|
|
$ |
5.57 |
|
Services
Operations
For
fiscal years 2009, 2008 and 2007, our services operations accounted for
approximately 15%, 20%, and, 14%, respectively, of our consolidated revenues and
are comprised of businesses in the Cayman Islands, the British Virgin Islands
and Bermuda. These businesses provide engineering and management services,
including designing and constructing desalination plants, and managing and
operating plants owned by other companies. Through June 2007, we had a service
contract for a plant in Barbados. Revenues recorded from this
contract amounted to $238,000 in 2007.
Engineering
and Management Services Operations
We
provide management, engineering and construction services for desalination
projects through DesalCo, which is recognized by suppliers as an original
equipment manufacturer of reverse osmosis seawater desalination plants for our
Company.
In late
2005, we established Aquilex, Inc., a wholly-owned U.S. subsidiary located in
Deerfield Beach, Florida, to provide financial, engineering and supply chain
support services to our operating segments.
Affiliate
Operations
Our
affiliate, OC-BVI, sells water to one bulk customer in the British Virgin
Islands. We own 50% of the voting shares of OC-BVI and have an overall 43.5%
equity interest in the profits of OC-BVI. We also own separate profit sharing
rights in OC-BVI that raise our effective interest in OC-BVI’s profits from
43.5% to approximately 45%. Sage Water Holdings (BVI) Limited (“Sage”) owns the
remaining 50% of the voting shares of OC-BVI and the remaining 55% interest in
its profits. Under the Articles of Association of OC-BVI, we have the right to
appoint three of the six directors of OC-BVI. Sage is entitled to appoint the
remaining three directors. In the event of a tied vote of the Board, the
President of the Caribbean Water and Wastewater Association, a regional trade
association comprised primarily of government representatives, is entitled to
appoint a junior director to cast a deciding vote.
We
provide certain engineering and administrative services to OC-BVI for a monthly
fee and a bonus arrangement which provides for payment of 4.0% of the net
operating income of OC-BVI.
We
account for our interests in OC-BVI using the equity method of
accounting.
Customer
OC-BVI
sells bulk water to the Government of The British Virgin Islands Water and
Sewerage Department (“BVIW&S”), which distributes the water through its own
pipeline system to residential, commercial and tourist properties on the islands
of Tortola and Jost Van Dyke in the British Virgin Islands. During 2009, OC-BVI
supplied BVIW&S with 576 million U.S. gallons of water from three
desalination plants located at Baughers Bay and Bar Bay, Tortola, and the island
of Jost Van Dyke in the British Virgin Islands.
Facilities
Through
the end of 2009, OC-BVI operated a seawater reverse osmosis plant at Baughers
Bay, Tortola, in the British Virgin Islands, which has a production capacity of
1.7 million U.S. gallons per day. The plant has an advanced energy recovery
system, generates its own electrical power on site using two large diesel driven
generator units and also purchases electricity from the BVI Electric Co. to
power ancillary equipment and provide building lighting.
In
October 2006, we were notified by OC-BVI that the Ministry of Communications and
Works of the Government of the British Virgin Islands (the “Ministry”) had
asserted a purported right of ownership of OC-BVI’s Baughers Bay desalination
plant pursuant to the terms of a Water Supply Agreement dated May 1990 (the
“1990 Agreement”) and had invited OC-BVI to submit a proposal for its continued
involvement in the production of water at the Baughers Bay plant in light of the
Ministry’s planned assumption of ownership. In November 2007 the Ministry
commenced litigation against OC-BVI in the Eastern Supreme Court of the
Caribbean seeking ownership of the Baughers Bay plant and was awarded ownership
and possession of this plant by the Court in October 2009. See
further discussion at “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations — Material Commitments, Expenditures and
Contingencies.”
In 2007,
OC-BVI completed the construction of a 720,000 U.S. gallons per day plant at Bar
Bay, Tortola, in the British Virgin Islands. This plant began supplying water to
the BVI government in January 2009. The definitive contract for the
sale of water from this plant was signed in March 2010. The contract
has a term of seven years with a seven year renewal option exercisable by the
BVI government.
OC-BVI’s
plant on the island of Jost Van Dyke was expanded in 2009 and has a capacity of
60,000 U.S. gallons per day. This plant operates under a contract
with the BVI government that expires July 8, 2013.
Reverse
Osmosis Technology
The
conversion of seawater to potable water is called desalination. The two primary
forms of desalination are distillation and reverse osmosis. Both methods are
used throughout the world and technologies are improving to lower the costs of
production. Reverse osmosis is a fluid separation process in which the saline
water is pressurized and the fresh water is separated from the saline water by
passing through a semi-permeable membrane which rejects the salts. The saline
(or seawater) water is first passed through a pretreatment system, which
generally consists of fine filtration and the addition of treatment chemicals if
required. Pre-treatment removes suspended solids and organics which could cause
fouling of the membrane surface. Next, a high-pressure pump pressurizes the
saline water thus enabling a 40% conversion of the saline water to fresh water
as it passes through the membrane, while 99% of the dissolved salts are rejected
and remain the concentrated saline water. This remaining feed water which has
now been concentrated is discharged without passing through the membrane. The
remaining hydraulic energy in the concentrated feed water is transferred to the
initial saline feed water with an energy recovery device thus reducing the total
energy requirement for the reverse osmosis system. The final step is
post-treatment, which consists of stabilizing the produced fresh water, thereby
removing undesirable dissolved gases, adjusting the pH and providing
chlorination to prepare it for distribution.
We use
reverse osmosis technology to convert seawater to potable water at all of the
plants we construct and operate. We believe that this technology is the most
effective and efficient conversion process for our market. However, we are
always seeking ways to maximize efficiencies in our current processes and
investigating new, more efficient processes to convert seawater to potable
water. The equipment at our plants is among the most energy efficient available
and we monitor and maintain the equipment in an efficient manner. As a result of
our decades of experience in seawater desalination, we believe that we have an
expertise in the development and operation of desalination plants which is
easily transferable to locations outside of our current operating
areas.
Raw
Materials and Sources of Supply
All
materials, parts and supplies essential to our business operations are obtained
from multiple sources and we use the latest industry technology. We do not
manufacture any parts or components for equipment essential to our business. Our
access to seawater for processing into potable water is granted through our
licenses and contracts with governments of the various jurisdictions in which we
have our operations.
Seasonal
Variations in Our Business
Our
operations are affected by the levels of tourism and are subject to seasonal
variations in our service areas. Demand for our water in the Cayman Islands,
Belize, the British Virgin Islands and The Bahamas is affected by variations in
the level of tourism and local weather, primarily rainfall. Tourism in our
service areas is affected by the economies of the tourists’ home countries,
primarily the United States and Europe, terrorist activity and perceived threats
thereof, and increased costs of fuel and airfares. We normally sell slightly
more water during the first and second quarters, when the number of tourists is
greater and local rainfall is less, than in the third and fourth quarters. We do
not believe that our operations in Nassau and Tortola are subject to significant
seasonal variations in demand.
Government
Regulations, Custom Duties and Taxes
Our
operations and activities are subject to the governmental regulations and taxes
of the countries in which we operate. The following summary of regulatory
developments and legislation does not purport to describe all present and
proposed regulation and legislation that may affect our businesses. Legislative
or regulatory requirements currently applicable to our businesses may change in
the future. Any such changes could impose new obligations on us that may
adversely affect our businesses and operating results.
The
Cayman Islands
The
Cayman Islands are a British Overseas Territory and have had a stable political
climate since 1670, when the Treaty of Madrid ceded the Cayman Islands to
England. The Queen of England appoints the Governor of the Cayman Islands to
make laws with the advice and consent of the legislative assembly. There are 15
elected members of the legislative assembly and three members appointed by the
Governor from the Civil Service. The Cabinet is responsible for day-to-day
government operations. The Cabinet consists of five ministers who are chosen by
the legislative assembly from its 15 popularly elected members, and the three
Civil Service members. The elected members choose from among themselves a leader
who is designated the Premier and is in effect the leader of the elected
government. The Governor has reserved powers and the United Kingdom retains full
control over foreign affairs and defense. The Cayman Islands are a common law
jurisdiction and have adopted a legal system similar to that of the United
Kingdom.
The
Cayman Islands have no taxes on profits, income, distributions, capital gains or
appreciation. We have exemptions from, or receive concessionaire rates of
customs duties on capital expenditures for plant and major consumable spare
parts and supplies imported into the Cayman Islands as follows:
|
•
|
We
do not pay import duty or taxes on reverse osmosis membranes, electric
pumps and motors and chemicals, but we do pay duty at the rate of 10% of
the cost, including insurance and transportation to the Cayman Islands, of
other plant and associated materials and equipment to manufacture or
supply water in the Seven Mile Beach or West Bay areas;
and
|
|
•
|
OC-Cayman
pays full customs duties in respect of all plants that it operates for the
Water Authority-Cayman.
|
The stamp
tax on the transfer of ownership of land in the Cayman Islands is a major source
of revenue to the Cayman Islands government. To prevent stamp tax avoidance by
transfer of ownership of the shares of a company which owns land in the Cayman
Islands (as opposed to transfer of the land itself), The Land Holding Companies
(Share Transfer Tax) Law was passed in 1976. The effect of this law is to charge
a company, which owns land or an interest in land in the Cayman Islands, a tax
based on the value of its land or interest in land attributable to each share
transferred. The stamp tax calculation does not take into account the proportion
which the value of a company’s Cayman land or interest in land bears to its
total assets and whether the intention of the transfer is to transfer ownership
of part of a company’s entire business or a part of its Cayman land or interest
in land.
Prior to
our common shares becoming publicly traded in the United States, we paid this
tax on private share transfers. We have never paid the tax on transfers of our
publicly traded shares and requested an exemption in 1994. On April 10, 2003, we
received notice that the Cayman Islands government had granted an exemption from
taxation for all transfers of our shares. We believe it is unlikely that
government will seek to collect this tax on transfers of our publicly traded
shares during 1994 through April 10, 2003.
The
Bahamas
The
Commonwealth of The Bahamas is an independent nation and a constitutional
parliamentary democracy with the Queen of England as the constitutional head of
state. The basis of the Bahamian law and legal system is the English common law
tradition with a Supreme Court, Court of Appeals, and a Magistrates
court.
We have
not been granted any tax exemptions for our Bahamian operations. Bahamian
companies are subject to an annual business license fee ranging from 1% to 2% of
their gross revenues.
Belize
Belize
(formerly British Honduras) achieved full independence from the United Kingdom
in 1981. Today, Belize is a constitutional monarchy with the adoption of a
constitution in 1991. Based on the British model with three independent
branches, the Queen of England is the constitutional head of state, represented
by a Governor General in the government. A Prime Minister and cabinet make up
the executive branch, while a 29 member elected House of Representatives and a
nine member appointed Senate form a bicameral legislature. The cabinet consists
of a prime minister, other ministers and ministers of state who are appointed by
the Governor-General on the advice of the Prime Minister, who has the support of
the majority party in the House of Representatives. Belize is an English common
law jurisdiction with a Supreme Court, Court of Appeals and local Magistrate
Courts.
The
Government of Belize has exempted CW-Belize from certain customs duties and all
revenue replacement duties until April 18, 2026, and had exempted CW-Belize from
company taxes until January 28, 2006. Belize levies a gross receipts tax on
corporations at a rate varying between 0.75% and 25%, depending on the type of
business, and a corporate income tax at a rate of 25% of chargeable income.
Gross receipts tax payable amounts are credited towards corporate income tax.
The Government of Belize also implemented certain environmental taxes and a
general sales tax effective July 1, 2006 and increased certain business and
personal taxes and created new taxes effective March 1, 2005. Belize levies
import duty on most imported items at rates varying between 0% and 45%, with
most items attracting a rate of 20%. In 2008, it was determined that the tax
exemption was no longer valid and CW-Belize paid approximately $156,000 of
business and corporate income tax for the period 2004 through 2008. Under the
terms of our water supply agreement with BWSL we are reimbursed by BWSL for all
taxes and customs duties that we are required to pay and have recorded this
reimbursement as an offset to our tax expense.
The
British Virgin Islands
The
British Virgin Islands is a British Overseas Territory that was first settled by
the Dutch in 1648 and annexed by the British in 1672. It adopted a new
constitution in 2007 and is a constitutional democracy with three branches of
government: the Executive Council, the Judiciary and the Legislative Council.
Executive authority is vested in the Queen of England, exercised through her
representative, the Governor. The Governor has responsibility for the courts,
public service, police, and foreign affairs, defense and full policy-making
authority. The Governor is not a member of the Executive Council but receives
assistance with the day-to-day operations of the government. The Executive
Council, comprised of various members of the legislature, is nominated by the
Premier and appointed by the Governor. The Parliament or Legislative Council is
made up of thirteen (13) seats with members elected by popular vote, serving up
to but no more than four-year terms. The British Virgin Islands are an English
common law jurisdiction with a Supreme Court, Court of Appeals and Magistrates
Court.
OC-BVI
received an exemption under the water supply agreement with The British Virgin
Islands government from all taxes, duties, levies and impositions on items which
it imports for the Baughers Bay plant. Under the terms of the March
2010 Bar Bay water sale agreement, OC-BVI must apply to the British Virgin
Islands government for duty and tax concessions relating to the Bar Bay plant’s
construction and operation. In the event that such concessions are
not granted or are partially granted, the British Virgin Islands government has
agreed to allow OC-BVI to increase its water rate to account for any duties and
taxes that are payable by OC-BVI.
Market
and Service Area
Although
we currently operate in the Cayman Islands, Belize, The British Virgin Islands,
The Bahamas and Bermuda, we believe that our potential market consists of any
location where there is a need for potable water. The desalination of seawater,
either through distillation or reverse osmosis, is the most widely used process
for producing fresh water in areas with an insufficient natural supply. We
believe our experience in the development and operation of distillation and
reverse osmosis desalination plants provides us with a significant opportunity
to successfully expand our operations beyond the markets in which we currently
operate.
Prior to
our acquisition of OC-Cayman in February 2003, the market that we serviced under
our exclusive license in the Cayman Islands consisted of Seven Mile Beach and
West Bay, Grand Cayman, two of the three most populated areas in the Cayman
Islands. The Cayman Islands Government, through the Water Authority-Cayman,
supplies water to parts of Grand Cayman, which are not within our licensed area,
as well as to Little Cayman and Cayman Brac. We operate all the reverse osmosis
desalination plants owned by the Water Authority-Cayman on Grand Cayman and
supply water under licenses and supply agreements held by OC-Cayman with the
Water Authority-Cayman.
According
to the most recent information published by the Economics and Statistics Office
of the Cayman Islands Government, the population of the Cayman Islands was
estimated in December 2005 to be approximately 52,000. According to the figures
published by the Department of Tourism Statistics Information Center, during the
year ended December 31, 2009, tourist air arrivals decreased by 10.2% and
tourist cruise ship arrivals decreased 2.1% over the same period in
2008.
Total
visitors for the year decreased from 1.9 million in 2009 to 1.8 million in 2008.
We believe that our water sales in the Cayman Islands are more positively
impacted by tourists that arrive by air than by those arriving by cruise ship,
since cruise ship tourists generally only remain on island for one day or less
as they do not remain on island overnight.
Tourist
air arrivals increased 6.8% and cruise ship arrivals increased 2.3% in January
2010, compared to the same period in 2009. At this time we are not able to
determine whether these trends will continue through 2010.
In
December 2005, the Ritz-Carlton Hotel, condominiums and golf course development
began operations. This development is required to purchase potable water from us
for the hotel and condominiums under the terms of our exclusive license
agreement, but not for its golf course.
During
2002, the government of the Cayman Islands amended the Development and Planning
Law to permit construction of buildings up to seven stories in certain zones
within our license area, including commercial and hotel zones. Previously,
buildings in these zones were only permitted to be built to three stories. We
believe that this change in the law has and will continue to facilitate the
development of certain properties within our license area that may have
otherwise not developed under the old height restriction, and it has already
facilitated the re-development of a number of existing properties, which have
been demolished re-built under the terms of the new height
restrictions.
The Town
of Camana Bay commenced construction in 2005 and will be developed over several
decades. The Camana Bay development is situated on 500 acres stretching from the
Caribbean sea to the North Sound within our retail license area on West Bay
Beach, and is mixed-use masterplanned community, which includes retail,
residential and institutional properties.
Our
current operations in Belize are located on Ambergris Caye, which consists of
residential, commercial and tourist properties in the town of San Pedro. This
town is located on the southern end of Ambergris Caye. Ambergris Caye is one of
many islands located east of the Belize mainland and off the southeastern tip of
the Yucatan Peninsula. Ambergris Caye is approximately 25 miles long and,
according to the Belize National Population Census 2000, has a population of
about 4,500 residents, which has increased approximately 144% over the previous
ten years. We provide bulk potable water to BWSL, which distributes this water
to this market. BWSL currently has no other source of potable water on Ambergris
Caye. Our contract with BWSL makes us their exclusive producer of desalinated
water on Ambergris Caye though 2026.
A 185
mile long barrier reef, which is the largest barrier reef in the Western
Hemisphere, is situated just offshore of Ambergris Caye. This natural attraction
is becoming a choice destination for scuba divers and tourists. According to
information published by the Belize Trade and Investment Development Service,
tourism is Belize’s second largest source of foreign income, next to
agriculture.
Our
current operations in The Bahamas are located on South Bimini Island and in
Nassau on New Providence. The Bimini Islands consist of North Bimini and South
Bimini, and are two of 700 islands which comprise The Bahamas. The Bimini
Islands are located approximately 50 miles east of Ft. Lauderdale, Florida and
are a premier destination for sport fishing enthusiasts. The population of the
Bimini Islands is approximately 1,600 persons and the islands have about 200
hotel and guest rooms available for tourists. The total land area of the Bimini
Islands is approximately 9 square miles. New Providence, Lyford Caye
and Paradise Island, connected by several bridges, are located approximately 150
miles east southeast of the Bimini Islands. With an area of 151 square miles and
a population of approximately 211,000, Nassau is the political capital and the
commercial hub of The Bahamas. As the largest city with its famed Cable Beach,
it accounts for more than two-thirds of the 4.0 million tourists who visit The
Bahamas annually.
The
British Virgin Islands are a British Overseas Territory and are situated east of
Puerto Rico. They consist of 16 inhabited and more than 20 uninhabited islands,
of which Tortola is the largest and most populated island. The islands are the
center for many large yacht-chartering businesses.
Competition
Cayman Islands. Pursuant to
our license granted by the Cayman Islands government, we have the exclusive
right to provide potable, piped water within our licensed service area on Grand
Cayman. At the present time, we are the only non-government-owned public water
utility on Grand Cayman. The Cayman Islands government, through the Water
Authority-Cayman, supplies water to parts of Grand Cayman located outside of our
licensed service area. Although we have no competition within our exclusive
retail license service area, our ability to expand our service area is at the
discretion of the Cayman Island government. Prior to 1991, any owner of property
within our exclusive retail license service area could install water-making
equipment for its own use. Since 1991, that option is only available to private
residences, although water plants in existence prior to 1991 can be maintained
but not replaced or expanded. The Cayman Islands government, through the Water
Authority-Cayman, supplies water to parts of Grand Cayman outside of our
licensed service area. We have competed with such companies as GE Water, Veolia,
and IDE for bulk water supply contracts with the Water
Authority-Cayman.
Belize. On Ambergris Caye in
Belize, our water supply contract with Belize Water Services Limited is
exclusive, and Belize Water Services Limited can no longer seek contracts with
other water suppliers, or produce water themselves, to meet their future needs
in San Pedro, Ambergris Caye, Belize.
The Bahamas. On South Bimini
Island in The Bahamas, we supply water to a private developer and do not have
competitors. GE Water operates a seawater desalination plant on North Bimini
Island. We competed with companies such as GE Water, Veolia,
IDE, Inima and Biwater for the new contract with the Bahamian
government to build and operate a seawater desalination plant at Blue Hills, New
Providence, Bahamas. We expect to compete with these companies and others for
future water supply contracts in The Bahamas.
British Virgin Islands. In
the British Virgin Islands, GE Water operates seawater desalination plants in
West End and Sea Cows Bay, Tortola, and on Virgin Gorda and generally bids
against OC-BVI for projects. Biwater PLC was recently awarded a 16
year contract to construct and operate a 2.75 million US gallon per day
desalination plant in Tortola for the British Virgin Islands
government. This contract was negotiated solely with Biwater and did
not go to competitive tender.
To
implement our growth strategy outside our existing operating areas, we will have
to compete with some of the same companies we competed with for the Blue Hills
project in Nassau, Bahamas such as GE Water, Veolia, IDE Technologies,
Inima, and Biwater and as well as other smaller companies like Seven Seas
Water. Some of these companies currently operate in areas in which we would like
to expand our operations and already maintain worldwide operations having
greater financial, managerial and other resources than our company. We believe
that our low overhead costs, knowledge of local markets and conditions and our
efficient manner of operating desalinated water production and distribution
equipment provide us with the capabilities to effectively compete for new
projects in the Caribbean basin and surrounding areas.
Environmental
Matters
Cayman Islands. With respect
to our Cayman Islands operations, although not required by local government
regulations, we operate our water plants in accordance with guidelines of the
Cayman Islands Department of Environment. We are licensed by the government to
discharge concentrated seawater, which is a byproduct of our desalination
process, into deep disposal wells.
Our
Cayman Islands license requires that our potable water quality meet the World
Health Organization’s Guidelines for Drinking Water Quality and contain less
than 200 mg/l of total dissolved solids. We completed upgrades to our ACWW, West
Bay and Britannia plants before October 1, 2003, and we meet all of the water
quality requirements in our Cayman license. In addition, noise levels at our
plants cannot exceed the standards established by the U.S. Occupational Safety
and Health Act.
Belize, The Bahamas, British Virgin
Islands. With respect to our Belize and Bahamas operations and OC-BVI’s
British Virgin Islands operations, we and OC-BVI are required by our water
supply contracts to take all reasonable measures to prevent pollution of the
environment. We are licensed by the Belize and Bahamian governments to discharge
concentrated seawater, which is a byproduct of our desalination process, into
deep disposal wells. OC-BVI is licensed by the British Virgin Islands government
to discharge concentrated seawater into the sea. We operate our plants in a
manner so as to minimize the emission of hydrogen sulfide gas into the
environment.
We are
not aware of any existing or pending environmental legislation, which may affect
our operations. To date we have not received any complaints from any regulatory
authorities.
Employees
As of
March 3, 2010, we employed a total of 120 persons, 73 in the Cayman Islands, 20
in The Bahamas, 19 in the United States, two in Bermuda and six in Belize. We
also managed the eight employees of OC-BVI in the British Virgin Islands. We
have eight management personnel and 27 administrative and clerical employees.
The remaining employees are engaged in engineering, purchasing, plant
maintenance and operations, pipe laying and repair, leak detection, new customer
connections, meter reading and laboratory analysis of water quality. None of our
employees is a party to a collective bargaining agreement. We consider our
relationships with our employees to be good.
Available
Information
Our
website address is http://www.cwco.com.
Information contained on our website is not incorporated by reference into this
Annual Report, and you should not consider information contained on our website
as part of this Annual Report.
We have
adopted a written code of conduct and ethics that applies to all of our
employees and directors, including, but not limited to, our principal executive
officer, principal financial officer, and principal accounting officer or
controller, or persons performing similar functions. The code of conduct and
ethics, the charters of the audit, compensation, and nomination committees of
our Board of Directors, are available at the Investors portion of our
website.
You may
access, free of charge, our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q, and current reports on Form 8-K, plus amendments to such reports as
filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, on our website and on the website of the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) as soon as reasonably practicable after we
electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC. In addition,
paper copies of these documents may be obtained free of charge by writing us at
the following address: Consolidated Water Co. Ltd., Regatta Office Park ,
Windward Three, 4th Floor, West Bay Road, P.O. Box 1114, Grand Cayman, KY1-1102,
Cayman Islands, Attention: Investor Relations; or by calling us at (345)
945-4277.
ITEM 1A. RISK
FACTORS
Investing
in our common shares involves risks. Prior to making a decision about investing
in our common shares, you should consider carefully the factors discussed below
and the information contained in this Annual Report. Each of these risks, as
well as other risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we
currently deem immaterial, could adversely affect our business, operating
results, cash flows and financial condition, and cause the value of our common
shares to decline, which may result in the loss of all or part of your
investment.
Our exclusive license to provide
water to retail customers in the Cayman Islands may not be renewed in the
future.
In the
Cayman Islands, we provide water to retail customers under a license, issued to
us in July 1990 by the Cayman Islands government that grants us the exclusive
right to provide water to retail customers within our licensed service area. Our
service area is comprised of an area on Grand Cayman that includes the Seven
Mile Beach and West Bay areas, two of the three most populated areas in the
Cayman Islands. For the year ended December 31, 2009, we generated approximately
40% of our consolidated revenues and 58% of our consolidated gross profits from
the retail water operations conducted pursuant to our exclusive license. Our
license expires in July 2010. If we are not in default of any terms of the
license, we have a right of first refusal to renew the license on terms that are
no less favorable than those that the government offers to any third
party.
During
our retail license renewal negotiations conducted with representatives of the
Cayman Island government during the fourth quarter of 2009 we were informed that
the Cayman Island government seeks to restructure the terms of our license to
employ a “rate of return on invested capital model’ similar to that governing
the sale of water to most U.S. municipalities. We have formally
objected to the implementation of a “rate of return on invested capital model”
on the basis that we believe that such a model would not promote the efficient
operation of our water utility, and could ultimately increase water rates to our
customers. We believe such a model, if ultimately implemented, could
significantly reduce the operating income we have historically generated from
our retail license.
If we are
unable to renew our license or if we negotiate a new license on terms that are
less favorable to us, we could lose a significant portion of our current
revenues and our results of operations, cash flows and financial condition could
be adversely affected.
We rely on fixed-term water supply
and/or service agreements with our bulk customers in the Cayman Islands,
Belize and The Bahamas, which may not be renewed or may be renewed on terms
less favorable to us.
All of
our bulk water supply agreements are for fixed terms ranging originally from
seven to 23 years and with a range of approximately one to 17 years remaining.
Upon expiration, these agreements may not be renewed or may be renewed on terms
less favorable to us. In addition, certain of these agreements for plants not
owned by us provide for our customers to take over the operations of the plant
upon expiration of the contract term. If this occurs, we may no longer generate
income from such plant. In instances where we own the plant that produces the
water under an agreement that is not renewed or renewed with lower production
quantities, we may not be able to find a new customer for the plant’s excess
production capacity. If our fixed-term agreements are not renewed or are renewed
on terms less favorable to us, our results of operations, cash flows and
financial condition could be adversely affected.
The
value of our investment in our affiliate OC-BVI is dependent upon the collection
of amounts recently awarded by the Eastern Supreme Court of the
Caribbean.
Since
expiration in May 1999 of the initial term of their bulk water supply agreement
dated May 1990 (the “1990 Agreement”), OC-BVI has supplied water to the British
Virgin Islands Water and Sewerage Department under what OC-BVI considers to be a
month-to-month supply arrangement. Under this arrangement, the British Virgin
Islands government could cease purchasing water from OC-BVI at any time.
Subsequent to May 1999, OC-BVI continued to make attempts to negotiate a new
water supply agreement.
In
October 2006, the British Virgin Islands government notified OC-BVI that it was
asserting a purported right of ownership of OC-BVI’s desalination plant in
Baughers Bay, Tortola pursuant to the terms of the 1990 Agreement and invited
OC-BVI to submit a proposal for its continued involvement in the production of
water at the Baughers Bay plant. Early in 2007, the British Virgin Islands
government unilaterally took the position that until such time as a new
agreement is reached on the ownership of the Baughers Bay plant and for the
price of the water produced by the plant, the BVI government would only pay that
amount of OC-BVI’s invoices that the BVI government purports constitutes
OC-BVI’s costs of producing the water. OC-BVI responded to the BVI government
that the amount the Ministry proposed to pay was significantly less than
OC-BVI’s production costs. Payments made by the BVI government to
OC-BVI since the BVI government’s assumption of this reduced price have been
sporadic.
On
November 15, 2007, OC-BVI issued a demand letter to the BVI government for
approximately $6.2 million representing amounts that OC-BVI claimed were due by
the BVI government for water sold and delivered plus interest and legal
fees. In response to OC-BVI’s demand for payment, the BVI government
issued a letter dated November 19, 2007 that reasserted its claim that ownership
of the Baughers Bay plant has passed to the BVI government and rejected OC-BVI’s
claim for payment. On November 22, 2007, OC-BVI’s management was
informed that the BVI government had filed a lawsuit with the Eastern Caribbean
Supreme Court seeking ownership and possession of the Baughers Bay
plant. OC-BVI counterclaimed that it was entitled to continued
possession and operation of the Baughers Bay plant until the BVI government pays
OC-BVI approximately $4.7 million, which it believes represents the value of the
Baughers Bay plant at its present expanded production
capacity. OC-BVI also took the legal position that since the BVI
government never paid the $1.42 million to purchase the Baughers Bay plant, the
1990 agreement terminated on May 31, 1999, which was eight months after the date
that the Ministry provided written notice of its intention to purchase the
plant.
On July
4, 2008, OC-BVI filed a claim with the Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court seeking
recovery of $7,806,629, representing amounts owed to OC-BVI for water sold and
delivered to the BVI government from the Baughers Bay plant through May 31,
2008, $842,188 for interest accrued on amounts owed as of May 31, 2008 and
future interest and costs. This claim was amended and increased on
April 22, 2009 to $13,773,954 for amounts owed for water delivered through March
31, 2009 plus accrued interest of $2,537,334 on amounts owed as of March 31,
2009 plus future interest and costs. The $13,773,954 amount
represents amounts billed at the contract prices in effect before the BVI
government asserted its purported right of ownership of the plant.
The
Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court held a three-day trial from July 22 through July
24, 2009 to address both the Baughers Bay ownership issue and OC-BVI’s claim for
payment of amounts owed for water sold and delivered to the BVI
government. On September 17, 2009, the Court issued a preliminary
ruling with respect to the litigation between the BVI government and
OC-BVI. The Court determined that the BVI government was entitled to
immediate possession of the Baughers Bay plant and dismissed OC-BVI’s claim for
compensation of approximately $4.7 million for improvements to the
plant. However, the Court determined that OC-BVI was entitled to full
payment of water invoices issued up to December 20, 2007, which had been
calculated under the terms of the original 1990 water supply agreement, and
ordered the BVI government to make an immediate interim payment of $5.0 million
to OC-BVI for amounts owed to OC-BVI. The Court deferred deciding the
entire dispute between the parties until it could conduct a hearing to determine
the reasonable rate for water produced by OC-BVI for the period from December
20, 2007 to the present.
After
conducting hearings on October 12 and 16, 2009, on October 28, 2009, the Court
ordered the BVI government to pay OC-BVI at the rate of $13.91 per thousand
imperial gallons for water produced by OC-BVI from December 20, 2007 to present,
which amounted to a total recovery for OC-BVI of $10.3 million as of September
30, 2009. The BVI government made a payment of $2 million to OC-BVI
under the Court order during the fourth quarter of 2009.
On
October 28, 2009, OC-BVI filed an appeal with the Eastern Caribbean Court of
Appeals (the “Appellate Court”) asking the Appellate Court to review the
September 17, 2009 ruling by the Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court as it relates
to OC-BVI’s claim for compensation for improvements to the Baughers Bay
plant.
On
October 29, 2009, the BVI government filed an appeal with the Appellate Court
seeking the Appellate Court’s review of the September 17, 2009 ruling of the
Court that the BVI government pay OC-BVI the reasonable rate for water produced
by OC-BVI for the period from December 20, 2007 to the present. The
BVI government is requesting a ruling from the Appellate Court that the BVI
government should only pay OC-BVI the actual cost of water produced at the
plant.
After
considering the September and October 2009 rulings of the Court of the Caribbean
relating to the Baughers Bay dispute, we determined that the carrying value of
our investment in OC-BVI exceeded the estimated fair value for our investment in
OC-BVI by approximately $160,000 as of September 30, 2009 and therefore
recognized an impairment loss of this amount on this investment during the three
months ended September 30, 2009. In February 2010, the BVI government announced
it had signed a long term contract with Biwater, PLC for the construction of a
new water plant to serve Tortola. We believe this new contract with
Biwater makes it unlikely that OC-BVI will be able to obtain a new long-term
operating contract for Baughers Bay. Accordingly, our calculation of
the estimated fair value of our equity investment in OC-BVI as of December 31,
2009 did not include any future cash flows to OC-BVI from a long term operating
contract for the Baughers Bay plant and as a result we recorded an additional
impairment loss for our equity investment in OC-BVI of $(4,500,000) during the
fourth quarter of 2009. The remaining carrying value of our
investment in OC-BVI of $9,157,995 at December 31, 2009 assumes OC-BVI will
collect in full the remaining $8 million awarded by the Court and will not be
required to return any of the $2 million paid to date by the BVI government on
the award. Should the BVI government be successful in its
appeal to reduce the $10 million award we will be required to record an
additional impairment charge in an amount equal to any reduction in the amount
previously awarded. Such impairment loss would reduce our earnings
and could have a significant adverse impact on our results of operations,
financial condition and cash flows.
We do not have sole control over our
affiliate, OC-BVI. A divergence of our interests and the interests of
OC-BVI’s other voting shareholder may adversely affect the operations of OC-BVI and,
in turn, decrease the value of our investment in
OC-BVI.
We own
43.5% of the equity and 50% of the voting shares of OC-BVI. We and Sage, which
owns the remaining 50% of the voting shares, are each entitled to appoint three
of the six directors of OC-BVI. If there is a tie vote of the directors on any
matter, the president of the Caribbean Water and Wastewater Association, a
regional trade association comprised primarily of government representatives, is
entitled to appoint a temporary director to cast the deciding vote. As a result,
although we provide operating management and engineering services to OC-BVI, we
share the overall management of OC-BVI with Sage and do not fully control its
operations. A divergence of our interests and the interests of Sage could
adversely affect the operations of OC-BVI and in turn decrease the value of our
investment in OC-BVI, in which case we could be required to record an impairment
charge to reduce the carrying value of our investment in OC-BVI. Such an
impairment charge would reduce our earnings and have a significant adverse
impact on our result of operations and financial condition.
The profitability of our plants is
dependent upon our ability to accurately estimate the costs of their
construction and operation.
The cost
estimates prepared in connection with the construction and operation of our
plants are subject to inherent uncertainties. Additionally, the terms of our
supply contracts may require us to guarantee the price of water on a per unit
basis, subject to certain annual inflation and monthly fuel cost adjustments,
and to assume the risk that the costs associated with producing this water may
be greater than anticipated. Because we base our contracted price of water in
part on our estimation of future construction and operating costs, the
profitability of our plants is dependent on our ability to estimate these costs
accurately. The cost of materials and services and the cost of the delivery of
such services may increase significantly after we submit our bid for a plant,
which could cause the gross margin and net return on investment for a plant to
be less than we anticipated when the bid was made. The profit margins we
initially expect to generate from a plant could be further reduced if future
operating costs for that plant exceed our estimates of such costs. These future
operating costs could be affected by a variety of factors, including lower than
anticipated production efficiencies and hydrological conditions at the plant
site that differ materially from those that existed at the time we submitted our
bid. Any construction and operating costs for our plants that significantly
exceed our initial estimates could adversely affect our results of operations,
financial condition and cash flows.
A significant portion of our
consolidated revenues are derived from two customers. A loss of, or a less
favorable relationship with, either of these customers would adversely affect our
results of operations.
Our top
two bulk water customers, the Water Authority-Cayman and the WSC, accounted for
approximately 15% and 26%, respectively, of our consolidated revenues for the
year ended December 31, 2009. If either of these customers terminate or decide
not to renew their contracts with us, or renew such contracts on terms that are
less favorable to us, or become unable for financial or other reasons to comply
with the terms of our contracts with them, our results of operations and
financial condition would be adversely affected.
Our operations are affected by
tourism and are subject to seasonal fluctuations which could affect demand for our
water and impact our revenues and results of operations.
Our
operations are affected by the levels of tourism and are subject to seasonal
variations in our service areas. Demand for our water in the Cayman Islands,
Belize and The Bahamas is affected by variations in the level of tourism and
local weather, primarily rainfall. Tourism in our service areas is affected by
the economies of the tourists’ home countries, primarily the United States and
Europe, terrorist activity and perceived threats thereof, and increased costs of
fuel and airfares. We normally sell slightly more water during the first and
second quarters, when the number of tourists is greater and local rainfall is
less, than in the third and fourth quarters. A downturn in tourism or greater
than expected rainfall in the locations we serve could adversely affect our
revenues and results of operations.
We may have difficulty accomplishing
our growth strategy within and outside of our current operating
areas.
Our
expansion both within our current operating areas and into new areas involves
significant risks, including, but not limited to, the following:
|
•
|
regulatory
risks, including government relations difficulties, local regulations and
currency controls;
|
|
•
|
receiving
and maintaining necessary permits, licenses and
approvals;
|
|
•
|
risks
related to operating in foreign countries, including political
instability, reliance on local economies, environmental problems,
shortages of materials, immigration restrictions and limited skilled
labor;
|
|
•
|
risks
related to development of new operations, including inaccurate assessment
of the demand for water, engineering difficulties and inability to begin
operations as scheduled; and
|
|
•
|
risks
relating to greater competition in these new territories, including the
ability of our competitors to gain or retain market share by reducing
prices.
|
Even if
we successfully expand our operations, we may have difficulty managing our
growth. We cannot assure you that any new operations within or outside of our
current operating areas will attain or maintain profitability or that the
results from these new operations will not negatively affect our overall
profitability.
Production shortfalls under any of
our bulk supply contracts could result in penalties or cancellation of the
contract.
Our bulk
water supply contracts require us to deliver specified minimum volumes of water.
From time to time since October 2004, we have been unable to deliver the minimum
water volumes required under one of our bulk water supply contracts because of
mechanical equipment problems and membrane fouling. At present, we believe we
have resolved the minimum supply issues for this plant. However, membrane
fouling or other technical problems could occur at any of our plants, and if we
are unable to meet the production minimums due to such operating issues, we
could be in technical default of the supply contract and subject to various
adverse consequences, including financial penalties or cancellation of the
contract.
Our operations could be harmed by
hurricanes or tropical storms.
A
hurricane or tropical storm could cause major damage to our equipment and
properties and the properties of our customers, including the large tourist
properties in our areas of operation. For example, in September 2004 Hurricane
Ivan caused significant damage to our plants and our customers’ properties,
which adversely affected our revenues. Any future damage could cause us to lose
use of our equipment and properties and incur additional repair costs. Damage to
our customers’ properties and the adverse impact on tourism could result in a
decrease in water demand. A hurricane or tropical storm could also disrupt the
delivery of equipment and supplies, including electricity, necessary to our
operations. These and other possible effects of hurricanes or tropical storms
could have an adverse impact on our results of operations and financial
condition.
Contamination of our processed water
may cause disruption in our services and adversely affect our
revenues.
Our
processed water may become contaminated by natural occurrences and by
inadvertent or intentional human interference, including acts of terrorism. In
the event that a portion of our processed water is contaminated, we may have to
interrupt the supply of water until we are able to install treatment equipment
or substitute the flow of water from an uncontaminated water production source.
In addition, we may incur significant costs in order to treat a contaminated
source of plant feed water through expansion of our current treatment
facilities, or development of new treatment methods. An inability by us to
substitute processed water from an uncontaminated water source or to adequately
treat the contaminated plant feed water in a cost-effective manner may have an
adverse effect on our revenues and our results of operations.
Potential government decisions,
actions and regulations could negatively affect our operations.
We are
subject to the local regulations of the Cayman Islands, Belize, the British
Virgin Islands, The Bahamas and Bermuda, all of which are subject to change. Any
government that regulates our operations may issue legislation or adopt new
regulations, including but not limited to:
|
•
|
restricting
foreign ownership of us;
|
|
•
|
providing
for the expropriation of our assets by the
government;
|
|
•
|
providing
for nationalization of public utilities by the
government;
|
|
•
|
providing
for different water quality
standards;
|
|
•
|
unilaterally
changing or renegotiating our licenses and
agreements;
|
|
•
|
restricting
the transfer of U.S. currency; or
|
|
•
|
causing
currency exchange fluctuations/devaluations or making changes in tax
laws.
|
As new
laws and regulations are issued, we may be required to modify our operations and
business strategy, which we may be unable to do in a cost-effective manner.
Failure by us to comply with applicable regulations could result in the loss of
our licenses or authorizations to operate, the assessment of penalties or fines,
or otherwise may have a material adverse effect on our results of
operations.
The rates we charge our retail
customers in the Cayman Islands are subject to regulation. If we are unable to
obtain government approval of our requests for rate increases, or if approved rate
increases are untimely or inadequate to cover our projected expenses, our
results of operations may be adversely affected.
Under our
exclusive retail license in the Cayman Islands, we must obtain prior approval
from the Cayman Islands government to increase our water supply rates, except
for inflation-related and energy-related adjustments. However, the expenses we
incur in supplying water under this license may increase due to circumstances
that were unforeseen at the time we entered into the license. We may incur
additional costs in attempting to obtain government approval of any rate
increase, which may be granted on a delayed basis, if at all. Failure to obtain
timely and adequate rate increases could have an adverse effect on our results
of operations.
We rely on the efforts of key
employees. Our failure to retain these employees could adversely affect our results of
operations.
Our
success depends upon the abilities of our executive officers. In particular, the
loss of the services of Fredrick W. McTaggart, our President and Chief Executive
Officer, could be detrimental to our operations and our continued success. Mr.
McTaggart has an employment agreement expiring on December 31, 2012. Each year,
the term of this agreement may be extended for an additional year. However, we
cannot guarantee that Mr. McTaggart will continue to work for us during the term
of his agreement or will enter into any extensions thereof.
We are exposed to credit risk through
our relationships with several customers and our
affiliate.
We are
subject to credit risk posed by possible defaults in payment by our bulk water
customers in the Cayman Islands, Belize, the British Virgin Islands and The
Bahamas and by possible defaults in payment of loan receivables by OC-BVI and
the Water Authority-Cayman. Adverse economic conditions affecting, or financial
difficulties of, those parties could impair their ability to pay us or cause
them to delay payment. We depend on these parties to pay us on a timely basis.
Our outstanding accounts receivable are not covered by collateral or credit
insurance. Any delay or default in payment could adversely affect our cash
flows, financial condition and results of operations.
We are exposed to the risk of
variations in currency exchange rates.
Although
we report our results in United States dollars, the majority of our revenue is
earned in other currencies. All of the currencies in our operating areas have
been fixed to the United States dollar for over 20 years and we do not employ a
hedging strategy against exchange rate risk associated with our reporting in
United States dollars. If any of these fixed exchange rates becomes a floating
exchange rate our results of operations and financial condition could be
adversely affected.
We may enter new markets in the
future in which we do not have a contractual commitment for our products or
existing customers.
Our
strategy contemplates potential entry into new markets where we believe a demand
for potable water exists beyond the current supply of potable water in those
markets. We may incur significant business development expenses in
the pursuit of new markets prior to obtaining a contract for services in these
markets, and such expenses could have an adverse impact on our results of
operations. We may decide to enter such markets by building new
reverse osmosis desalination plants before we have obtained a contract for the
sale of water produced by the new plant or before we have established a customer
base for the water produced by the new plant. If after completing such plant we
are unable to obtain a contract or sufficient number of customers for the plant,
we may be unable to recover the cost of our investment in the plant, which could
have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows.
Future sales of our common shares may
depress the market price of our common shares.
If we or
our existing shareholders sell substantial amounts of common shares or if it is
perceived that such sales could occur, the market price of our common shares
could decline. In addition, if these sales were to occur, we may find it
difficult to sell equity or equity-related securities in the future at a time
and price that we deem desirable.
We may not pay dividends in the
future. If dividends are paid, they may be in lesser amounts than past
dividends.
Our
shareholders may receive dividends out of legally available funds if, and when,
they are declared by our Board of Directors. We have paid dividends in the past,
but may cease to do so at any time. Under the agreements governing certain of
our outstanding debt obligations, we may only pay dividends from “cash flows,”
defined under the applicable agreement as consolidated net income plus non-cash
charges less capital expenditures and scheduled debt repayment, calculated
annually on a fiscal year basis. We may incur increased capital requirements or
additional indebtedness in the future that may restrict our ability to declare
and pay dividends. We may also be restricted from paying dividends in the future
due to restrictions imposed by applicable corporate laws, our financial
condition and results of operations, covenants contained in our financing
agreements, management’s assessment of future capital needs and other factors
considered by our Board of Directors. We may not continue to pay dividends in
the future or, if dividends are paid, they may not be in amounts similar to past
dividends.
Service of process and enforcement of
legal proceedings commenced against us in the United States may be difficult to
obtain.
We are
incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands and a substantial portion of
our assets are located outside of the United States. In addition, 11 out of 15
of our directors and officers reside outside the United States. As a result, it
may be difficult for investors to affect service of process within the United
States upon us and such other persons, or to enforce judgments obtained against
such persons in United States courts, and bring any action, including actions
predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the United States securities
laws. In addition, it may be difficult for investors to enforce, in original
actions brought in courts or jurisdictions located outside of the United States,
rights predicated upon the United States securities laws.
Based on
the advice of our Cayman Islands legal counsel, we believe there is no
reciprocal statutory enforcement of foreign judgments between the United States
and the Cayman Islands, and that foreign judgments originating from the United
States are not directly enforceable in the Cayman Islands. A prevailing party in
a United States proceeding against us or our officers or directors would have to
initiate a new proceeding in the Cayman Islands using the United States judgment
as evidence of the party’s claim. A prevailing party could rely on the summary
judgment procedures available in the Cayman Islands, subject to available
defenses in the Cayman Islands courts, including, but not limited to, the lack
of competent jurisdiction in the United States courts, lack of due service of
process in the United States proceeding and the possibility that enforcement or
recognition of the United States judgment would be contrary to the public policy
of the Cayman Islands.
Depending
on the nature of damages awarded, civil liabilities under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended (or the Securities Act), or the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (or the Exchange Act), for original actions instituted outside
the Cayman Islands may or may not be enforceable. For example, a United States
judgment awarding remedies unobtainable in any legal action in the courts of the
Cayman Islands, such as treble damages, would likely not be enforceable under
any circumstances.
Low trading volume of our stock may
limit your ability to sell your shares at or above the price you pay for
them.
During
the year ended December 31, 2009, the average daily trading volume of our common
shares was approximately 94,284 shares, a much lower trading volume than the
stock of many other companies listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market. A
public trading market having the desired characteristics of depth, liquidity and
orderliness depends on the presence in the market of willing buyers and sellers
of our common shares at any given time. This presence in turn depends on the
individual decisions of investors and general economic and market conditions
over which we have no control. As a consequence of the limited volume of trading
in our common shares, an investor in our stock may have difficulty selling a
large number of our common shares in the manner or at the price that might be
attainable if our common shares were more actively traded. In addition, as a
result of our low trading volume, the market price of our common shares may not
accurately reflect their value.
Competition may threaten the
sustainability and growth of our current operations and impede the expansion
of our operations into new areas.
We face
competition in our areas of operation in renewing our present supply contracts
and in our efforts to expand our current operations within those areas. We also
face competition in attempting to expand our operations to new areas. We often
compete with larger companies, including units of General Electric Company and
Veolia Environment. Some of our current and potential competitors have technical
and financial resources and marketing and service organizations that are
significantly greater than ours. Moreover, our competitors may forecast the
course of market developments more accurately and could in the future develop
new technologies that compete with our services. Additional competitors with
significant market presence and financial resources may enter those markets,
thereby further intensifying competition. These competitors may be able to
reduce our market share by adopting more aggressive pricing policies than we can
adopt or by developing technology and services that gain wider market acceptance
than our technology and/or services. If we do not compete successfully, we may
be unable to maintain or increase our operations and our results of operations
and financial condition could be adversely affected.
We are subject to anti-takeover
measures that may discourage, delay or prevent changes of control of Consolidated
Water Co. Ltd.
Classified Board of
Directors. We have a classified Board that consists of three groups of
directors. Only one group of directors is elected each year. Our classified
Board may increase the length of time necessary for an acquirer to change the
composition of a majority of directors in order to gain control of our
Board.
Option Deed. Our Board of
Directors has adopted an Option Deed that is intended to improve the bargaining
position of our Board of Directors in the event of an unsolicited offer to
acquire our outstanding stock. Under the terms of the Option Deed, a stock
purchase right is attached to each of our current or future outstanding common
shares issued prior to the time the purchase rights become exercisable, are
redeemed or expire. The purchase rights will become exercisable only if an
individual or group has acquired, or obtained the right to acquire, or announced
a tender or exchange offer that if consummated would result in such individual
or group acquiring beneficial ownership of 20% or more of our outstanding common
shares. Upon the occurrence of a triggering event, the rights will entitle every
holder of our common shares, other than the acquirer, to purchase our shares or
shares of our successor on terms that would likely be economically dilutive to
the acquirer. Under certain circumstances, instead of common shares, our Board
of Directors may issue cash or debt securities. Our Board of Directors, however,
has the power to amend the Option Deed so that it does not apply to a particular
acquisition proposal or to redeem the rights for a nominal value before they
become exercisable. These features will likely encourage an acquirer to
negotiate with our Board of Directors before commencing a tender offer or to
condition a tender offer on our Board of Directors taking action to prevent the
purchase rights from becoming exercisable. In March 2007, our Board extended the
expiration date of the Option Deed through July 2017.
As a
result of these anti-takeover measures, we could deter efforts to make changes
to, or exercise control over, current management. In addition, our shareholders
may not have an opportunity to sell their common shares to a potential acquirer
at the acquirer’s offering price, which is typically at a premium to market
price.
Restrictive covenants in our credit
facilities and trust deeds could adversely affect our business by limiting our
flexibility; our failure to comply with these covenants could cause
foreclosure on our assets.
Our
credit facilities and the trust deeds governing the terms of our debt securities
contain restrictive covenants. These covenants and requirements limit our
ability, without approval of the lender or trustee, to take various actions,
including incurring additional debt, making capital expenditures, guaranteeing
indebtedness, engaging in various types of transactions, including mergers and
sales of assets, and paying dividends and making distributions or other
restricted payments. These covenants could place us at a disadvantage compared
to some of our competitors which may not be required to operate under these or
similar restrictions. Further, these covenants could have an adverse effect on
our business by limiting our ability to take advantage of financing, acquisition
or investment opportunities. A material breach of any of these covenants would
constitute a default under our credit facilities or trust deeds. In the event of
default, the lender or trustee may accelerate repayment of our outstanding
indebtedness. If we are unable to repay the amounts accelerated, the lender or
trustee has the right to foreclose on substantially all of our assets, which we
have pledged to secure that indebtedness. Foreclosure upon our assets would have
a significant adverse affect on our results of operations, financial condition
and our ability to continue operations.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF
COMMENTS
None.
ITEM
2. PROPERTIES
Cayman
Island Properties
Abel Castillo Water Works
(formerly Governor’s Harbour)
We own
our Abel Castillo Water Works (“ACWW”) site and the 12,812 square feet of
buildings, which contain two reverse osmosis water treatment plants, a
distribution pump house and warehouse space, and operate and maintain the site
through our wholly-owned subsidiary, Cayman Water. The site is located on 3.2
acres, including 485 feet of waterfront. The current water production capacity
of our site is 2.2 million U.S. gallons per day by two separate water plants
designated GHB-1 and GHB-2 with rated production capacities of 1.2 million and 1
million US gallons per day respectively. On this site we also have three 1.0
million U.S. gallon potable water storage tanks and a high service distribution
pump house.
We own an
approximately 1 acre property adjacent to our ACWW plant which we purchased in
2007 to provide space for future additional water production and storage
facilities. An approximately 8,000 square foot, single story concrete block
building is currently on the site, which was formerly used as a school. We
expect to demolish this building in the future in order to utilize this site for
its ultimate intended purpose.
West Bay
Plant
We own,
operate and maintain our West Bay plant in Grand Cayman, which is located on 6.1
acres in West Bay. The plant began operating in 1995 and was expanded in 1998,
2000 and 2008. On this site we have a 2,600 square foot building which houses
our water production facilities, a 2,400 square foot building which houses the
potable water distribution pumps, a water quality testing laboratory, and office
space and water storage capacity consisting of three 1.0 million U.S. gallon
potable water tanks. The capacity of our West Bay plant was expanded to 910,000
U.S. gallons per day in 2008.
Britannia
Plant
We own
the Britannia seawater desalination plant in Grand Cayman, which consists of a
seawater reverse osmosis production plant with a capacity of 715,000 U.S.
gallons of water per day, an 840,000 U.S. gallon bolted steel water tank,
potable water high service pumps, and various ancillary equipment to support the
operation. We have entered into a lease of the 0.73 acre site and steel frame
building which houses the plant from Cayman Hotel and Golf Inc., for a term of
25 years at an annual rent of $1.00.
Distribution
System
We own
our Seven Mile Beach and West Bay potable water distribution systems in Grand
Cayman. The combined systems consist of polyvinyl chloride and polyethylene
water pipes, valves, curb stops, meter boxes, and water meters installed in
accordance to accepted engineering standards in the United States of
America.
Corporate
Office
We lease
approximately 5,500 square feet of office space at the Regatta Office Park, West
Bay Road, Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands. In October 2007, we exercised an option
to extend this lease through April 30, 2011.
Red Gate Road
Plant
Under the
terms of the water production and supply license between OC-Cayman and the
government of the Cayman Islands, OC-Cayman is allowed to use the property and
the plant for the Red Gate Road plant to produce approximately 1.3 million U.S.
gallons of desalinated water per day for sale to the Water Authority-Cayman. On
November 30, 2008, the license was extended for a period of one year, during
which time OC-Cayman was required to continue to operate and maintain the plant.
The plant was originally powered only by electricity, but was upgraded in 1994
to include diesel driven high-pressure pumps. In August 2008, the Water
Authority-Cayman asked OC-Cayman to convert the high-pressure pumps back to
electrical power and make other modifications and improvements to the plant.
This work is expected to be completed by April 2010, for which OC-Cayman will
obtain a seven year license and operating agreement for the plant.
Lower Valley
Plant
OC-Cayman
provided the plant and equipment to the Water Authority-Cayman under a
vendor-financed sale and operating agreement which has been extended on two
occasions. OC-Cayman operates the electrically-powered 1.1 million U.S. gallons
per day rated plant and supplies approximately 916,000 U.S. gallons of
desalinated water per day to the Water Authority-Cayman.
In 2005,
the Water Authority-Cayman accepted our proposal to increase the capacity of the
Lower Valley plant to 1.1 million U.S. gallons per day in exchange for a
seven-year extension of the license.
OC-Cayman
leases the property on which the plant is located from the Water
Authority-Cayman for a minimal annual rent for the duration of the operating
agreement, which originally was set to expire on March 9, 2006, but was extended
effective January 2006 with the seven-year extension of the license.
Responsibility for operation of the plant passes to the Water Authority-Cayman
upon expiration of the operating agreement.
North Sound
Plant
Construction
of this plant was completed in November 2002. OC-Cayman provided the plant and
equipment to the Water Authority-Cayman under a seven-year vendor-financed sale
and operating agreement. OC-Cayman operates the electrically powered plant and
supplies approximately 1.59 million U.S. gallons of desalinated water per day to
the Water Authority-Cayman. OC-Cayman leases the property on which the plant is
located from the Water Authority-Cayman for a minimal annual rent, for the
duration of the sale and operating agreement. The sale and operating agreement
and property lease were recently extended and are expected to expire in the
first quarter of 2014. Responsibility for operation of the plant passes to the
Water Authority-Cayman upon expiration of the sale and operating
agreement.
North Side Water Works Plant
(NSWW)
Construction
of this plant was completed in June 2009. OC-Cayman provided the plant and
equipment to the Water Authority-Cayman under a ten-year vendor-financed sale
and operating agreement. OC-Cayman operates the electrically powered plant which
can supply up to approximately 2.38 million U.S. gallons of
desalinated water per day to the Water Authority-Cayman. OC-Cayman leases the
property on which the plant is located from the Water Authority-Cayman for a
minimal annual rent, for the duration of the sale and operating agreement.
Responsibility for operation of the plant passes to the Water Authority-Cayman
upon expiration of the sale and operating agreement.
Belize
Properties
We own
our San Pedro water production facility in Ambergris Caye, Belize. The plant
consists of a one story concrete block building, which contains a seawater RO
water production plant with a production capacity of 550,000 U.S. gallons per
day. We lease the land on which our plant is located from the Government of
Belize at an annual rent of BZE$1.00. This lease expires in April
2026.
Bahamas
Properties
We own
the water production facility in South Bimini. The facility consists of a
250,000 U.S. gallon bolted steel potable water tank and two 40 foot long
standard shipping containers which contain a seawater reverse osmosis production
plant with a rated capacity of 115,000 U.S. gallons per day, a high service pump
skid and an office. The facility is located on a parcel of land owned by South
Bimini International Ltd., and we are allowed, under the terms of our agreement,
to utilize the land for the term of the agreement without charge.
We own a
water production facility, the Windsor plant, located in Nassau, New Providence,
with a production capacity of 3.1 million U.S. gallons per day. The plant is
powered by a combination of diesel engine-driven high-pressure pumps, and
electrical power purchased from the Bahamas Electricity Corporation to power all
other loads in the plant. The plant is contained within a 13,000 sq. ft.
concrete and steel building that also contains a warehouse, workshop and
offices. It is located on land owned by the Water and Sewerage Corporation of
The Bahamas and our 15 year water sales agreement gives us a license to use the
land throughout the term of that agreement.
In July
2006, we substantially completed construction of a second water production
facility in Nassau, New Providence: the Blue Hills plant. With a production
capacity of 7.2 million U.S. gallons per day this plant is the largest
desalination plant we have built or operated to date. The plant is powered by a
combination of diesel engine-driven high-pressure pumps, and electrical power
purchased from the Bahamas Electricity Corporation to power all other loads in
the plant. The plant is contained within a 16,000 sq. ft. concrete and steel
building that also contains a warehouse, workshop and offices. It is located on
land owned by the Water and Sewerage Corporation of The Bahamas and our 20 year
water sales agreement gives us a license to use the land throughout the term of
that agreement.
U.S.
Property
In July
2005, we guaranteed the financial obligations of a five year lease in Deerfield
Beach, Florida for approximately 7,200 square feet of office and warehouse space
for Aquilex, Inc., our wholly-owned subsidiary that was incorporated in the
United States for the purpose of providing financial, engineering and supply
chain management support services to our operating
subsidiaries.
ITEM
3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
On
November 17, 2006, Gruppozecca Bahamas Limited (“GBL”) filed a Statement of
Claim in the Supreme Court of the Commonwealth of The Bahamas against CW-Bahamas
seeking damages in excess of $950,000 for CW-Bahamas alleged breach of its
obligations under an agreement between GBL and CW-Bahamas relating to the
construction of our Blue Hills plant. On April 2, 2009, this
litigation was settled and all claims against CW-Bahamas were dismissed in
exchange for a final progress payment under the construction agreement between
the parties in the amount of $480,000.
Our
affiliate, OC-BVI, is involved in litigation with the BVI
government. For information relating to this dispute, see “Item
7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations Material Commitments, Expenditures and
Contingencies.”
From time
to time the Company is involved in legal proceedings or claims arising in the
normal course of business. Other than already disclosed, the Company is not
aware of any legal proceedings or claims, either threatened or pending, that
management believes would result in a material adverse effect on the financial
position or results of operations.
ITEM
4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF
SECURITY HOLDERS
No matter
was submitted during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this
Annual Report to a vote of security holders, through the solicitation of proxies
or otherwise.
PART
II
ITEM 5.
|
MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON
EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY
SECURITIES
|
|
Market
Information
Our Class
A common stock is listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market and trades under the
symbol “CWCO.” Listed below, for each quarter of the last two fiscal years, are
the high and low closing prices for our Class A common stock on the NASDAQ
Global Select Market.
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
First
Quarter 2009
|
|
$ |
12.71 |
|
|
$ |
6.56 |
|
Second
Quarter 2009
|
|
|
18.18 |
|
|
|
10.30 |
|
Third
Quarter 2009
|
|
|
19.96 |
|
|
|
14.85 |
|
Fourth
Quarter 2009
|
|
|
14.29 |
|
|
|
12.63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
Quarter 2008
|
|
$ |
28.78 |
|
|
$ |
18.00 |
|
Second
Quarter 2008
|
|
|
24.95 |
|
|
|
15.92 |
|
Third
Quarter 2008
|
|
|
23.20 |
|
|
|
16.00 |
|
Fourth
Quarter 2008
|
|
|
15.12 |
|
|
|
8.64 |
|
No
trading market exists for our redeemable preferred shares, which are only issued
to, or purchased by, long-term employees of our company and must be held by
these employees for a period of four years before they vest.
On
October 12, 2009, we issued 3,928 shares of common stock to our directors under
the Non-Executive Directors’ Share Plan in consideration for their service on
our Board of Directors and the committees thereof. See “Item 11. Executive
Compensation — Director Compensation.”
On
September 27, 2005, the Company entered into a Second Deed of Amendment (the
“Amendment”) to its Option Deed dated as of August 6, 1997 and as amended on
August 8, 2005 between the Company and American Stock Transfer & Trust
Company (the “Option Deed”). In March 2007, our Board extended the expiration
date of the Option Deed through July 2017.
The
Option Deed grants to each holder of a common and preferred share an option to
purchase one one-hundredth of a class B common share at an exercise price of
$100.00, subject to adjustment. If an attempt to take over control of the
Company occurs, each shareholder of the Company would be able to exercise the
option and receive common shares with a value equal to twice the exercise price
of the option. Under circumstances described in the Option Deed, as amended,
instead of receiving common shares, the Company may issue to each shareholder
(i) cash; (ii)other equity or debt securities of the Company; or (iii) the
equity securities of the acquiring company, as the case may be, with a value
equal to twice the exercise price of the option.
Pursuant
to the Amendment to the Option Deed, each holder of a common and redeemable
preferred share has the option to purchase one one-hundredth of a class B common
share at an exercise price of $50.00, subject to adjustment. The Amendment does
not modify the Option Deed in any other material respect.
The
options are attached to each common share and redeemable preferred share, and
presently have no monetary value. The options will not trade separately from the
Company’s shares unless and until they become exercisable. The options, which
expire on July 31, 2017, may be redeemed, at the option of the Company’s Board
of Directors, at a price of CI$.01 per option at any time until ten business
days following the date that a group or person acquires ownership of 20% or more
of the Company’s outstanding common shares.
Our
2,023,850 Bahamian Depository Receipts (“BDRs”) are listed and traded only on
the Bahamian International Stock Exchange (“BISX”). Currently 404,770 shares of
our common stock underlie the BDRs and are held in a custodial account in The
Bahamas. The BDRs are subject to dividend payments, when and if declared, in
proportion to their relative value to our common shares.
Holders
On March
10, 2010, we had 859 holders of record of our common stock.
Dividends
We have
paid dividends to owners of our common shares and redeemable preference shares
since we began declaring dividends in 1985. However, the payment of any future
cash dividends will depend upon our earnings, financial condition, cash flows,
capital requirements and other factors our Board deems relevant in determining
the amount and timing of such dividends.
The Board
of Directors declares and approves all dividends.
Listed
below, for each quarter of the last two fiscal years, is the amount of dividends
declared on our issued and outstanding shares of common stock and redeemable
preferred shares.
Fourth
Quarter 2009
|
|
$ |
0.075 |
|
Per Share
|
Third
Quarter 2009
|
|
|
0.075 |
|
Per
Share
|
Second
Quarter 2009
|
|
|
0.065 |
|
Per
Share
|
First
Quarter 2009
|
|
|
0.065 |
|
Per
Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth
Quarter 2008
|
|
$ |
0.065 |
|
Per
Share
|
Third
Quarter 2008
|
|
|
0.065 |
|
Per
Share
|
Second
Quarter 2008
|
|
|
0.065 |
|
Per
Share
|
First
Quarter 2008
|
|
|
0.13 |
|
Per
Share
|
Exchange
Controls and Other Limitations Affecting Security Holders
Our
Company is not subject to any governmental laws, decrees or regulations in the
Cayman Islands which restrict the export or import of capital, or that affect
the remittance of dividends, interest or other payments to non-resident holders
of our securities. The Cayman Islands does not impose any limitations on the
right of non-resident owners to hold or vote our common stock other than stated
below. There are no exchange control restrictions in the Cayman
Islands.
Taxation
The
Cayman Islands presently impose no taxes on profit, income, distribution,
capital gains, or appreciations of our Company and no taxes are currently
imposed in the Cayman Islands on profit, income, capital gains, or appreciations
of the holders of our securities or in the nature of estate duty, inheritance,
or capital transfer tax. There is no income tax treaty between the United States
and the Cayman Islands.
As
discussed in Part I, Item 1, we were subject in the Cayman Islands to a stamp
tax when our shares are transferred. Prior to our common shares becoming quoted
in the United States, we paid this tax on private share transfers. We have never
paid the tax on transfers of our publicly traded shares. Since 1994, we
requested that the Cayman Islands government exempt us from the share transfer
tax. On April 10, 2003, we received notice that the Cayman Islands government
had granted an exemption from taxation for all transfers of our shares. The
government has not, and we believe it is unlikely that government will, seek to
collect this tax on transfers of our publicly traded shares during the period
1994 through April 10, 2003.
The
information required by Item 201(d) of Regulation S-K is provided under Item 12
of this Annual Report.
ITEM
6. SELECTED FINANCIAL
DATA
The table
below contains selected financial data, expressed in U.S. dollars, derived from
our audited consolidated financial statements for each of the years in the
five-year period ended December 31, 2009. Our consolidated financial statements
are prepared in accordance with the accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States (“US-GAAP”). As a result, all financial information presented
herein has been prepared in accordance with US-GAAP. This selected financial
data should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and with our consolidated
financial statements and related notes thereto contained elsewhere in this
Annual Report.
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
Statement
of Income Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
(1)
|
|
$ |
58,019,517 |
|
|
$ |
65,678,959 |
|
|
$ |
54,076,865 |
|
|
$ |
42,607,330 |
|
|
$ |
28,365,680 |
|
Net
Income
|
|
|
6,098,571 |
|
|
|
7,209,716 |
|
|
|
11,387,651 |
|
|
|
7,521,126 |
|
|
|
5,514,258 |
|
Balance
Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Assets
|
|
|
154,475,781 |
|
|
|
154,656,574 |
|
|
|
149,330,884 |
|
|
|
138,961,343 |
|
|
|
88,365,191 |
|
Long
Term Debt Obligations (including current portion)
|
|
|
21,129,267 |
|
|
|
22,358,340 |
|
|
|
23,500,593 |
|
|
|
24,654,660 |
|
|
|
19,378,212 |
|
Redeemable
Preferred Stock
|
|
|
10,315 |
|
|
|
10,420 |
|
|
|
12,650 |
|
|
|
14,983 |
|
|
|
19,382 |
|
Noncontrolling
interests
|
|
|
1,449,030 |
|
|
|
2,020,721 |
|
|
|
1,954,754 |
|
|
|
1,495,755 |
|
|
|
833,695 |
|
Dividends
Declared Per Share
|
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
$ |
0.325 |
|
|
$ |
0.195 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
Basic
Earnings Per Share
|
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
|
$ |
0.50 |
|
|
$ |
0.79 |
|
|
$ |
0.60 |
|
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
Weighted
Average Number of Shares
|
|
|
14,535,192 |
|
|
|
14,519,847 |
|
|
|
14,404,732 |
|
|
|
12,440,195 |
|
|
|
11,767,573 |
|
Diluted
Earnings Per Share
|
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
|
$ |
0.50 |
|
|
$ |
0.79 |
|
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
Weighted
Average Number of Shares
|
|
|
14,588,144 |
|
|
|
14,538,971 |
|
|
|
14,495,364 |
|
|
|
12,737,486 |
|
|
|
12,161,407 |
|
(1) During
the fourth quarter of 2008, we reclassified to revenues certain amounts charged
to our customers for increases in energy costs. Such amounts had previously been
reflected in our consolidated results of operations as a reduction of the energy
component of our cost of revenues. These reclassifications had no impact on
previously reported amounts of gross profit or net income. Revenues amounts
presented above have been revised consistent with this reclassification for all
years presented.
ITEM 7.
|
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OFOPERATIONS
|
Overview
Our
objective is to provide water services in areas where the supply of potable
water is scarce and where the use of reverse osmosis (“RO”) technology to
produce potable water is economically feasible.
We intend
to increase revenues by developing new business opportunities both within our
current service areas and in new areas. We expect to maintain operating
efficiencies by continuing to focus on our successful business model and by
properly executing our equipment maintenance and water loss mitigation programs.
We believe that many Caribbean basin and adjacent countries, being water scarce,
present opportunities for operation of our plants in favorable regulatory
environments.
Our
operations and activities are now conducted at 16 plants in five countries: the
Cayman Islands, The Bahamas, the British Virgin Islands, Belize and Bermuda and
in three business segments: retail, bulk and services. The following table sets
forth the comparative combined production capacity of our retail, bulk and
affiliate operations as of December 31 of each year.
Comparative Operations
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Location
|
|
Plants
|
|
|
Capacity(1)
|
|
|
Location
|
|
Plants
|
|
|
Capacity(1)
|
|
Cayman
Islands
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
Cayman
Islands
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
|
Bahamas
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
Bahamas
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
Belize
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
Belize
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
British
Virgin Islands
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
British
Virgin Islands
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
Bermuda
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
Bermuda
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
Total
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
24.3 |
|
|
Total
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
21.8 |
|
(1)
|
In
millions of U.S. gallons per day.
|
Cayman
Islands
We have
been operating our business on Grand Cayman Island since 1973 and have been
using RO technology to convert seawater to potable water since 1989. There is a
limited natural supply of fresh water on the Cayman Islands. We currently have
an exclusive license from the Cayman Islands government to process potable water
from seawater and then sell and distribute that water by pipeline to Seven Mile
Beach and West Bay, Grand Cayman. Our operations consist of eight reverse
osmosis seawater conversion plants which provide water to approximately 5,000
retail residential and commercial customers within a government licensed area
and bulk water sales to the Water Authority-Cayman. Our pipeline system in the
Cayman Islands covers the Seven Mile Beach and West Bay areas of Grand Cayman
and consists of approximately 71 miles of polyvinyl chloride and high density
polyethylene pipe. During 2009, we supplied approximately 804 million U.S.
gallons (2008: 772 million U.S. gallons) of water to our retail water customers
and 1,108 million U.S. gallons (2008: 1,045 million U.S. gallons) to our bulk
customers in Grand Cayman.
Bahamas
CW-Bahamas
produces potable water from three reverse osmosis seawater conversion plants.
Two of these plants, the Windsor plant and the Blue Hills plant, are located in
New Providence and have a total installed capacity of 10.4 million U.S. gallons
per day. CW-Bahamas supplies water from these plants on a take or pay basis to
the Water and Sewerage Corporation of The Bahamas under long-term build, own and
operate supply agreements. During 2009, we supplied approximately 3.1 billion
U.S. gallons (2008: 3.2 billion U.S. gallons) of water to the Water and Sewerage
Corporation from these plants. CW-Bahamas’ third plant is located in Bimini, has
a capacity of 115,000 U.S. gallons per day, and provides potable water to the
Bimini Sands Resort and to the Bimini Beach Hotel. During 2009, we supplied
approximately 6.1 million U.S. gallons (2008: 6.0 million U.S. gallons) of water
to these customers. We have also sold water intermittently to the WSC from our
Bimini plant when their regular supply was unavailable. During 2009, we supplied
the WSC with 0.5 million U.S. gallons of water from our Bimini
plant.
Belize
Our
Belize operation, which was acquired on July 21, 2000, consists of one reverse
osmosis seawater conversion plant on Ambergris Caye, Belize, Central America
capable of producing 550,000 U.S. gallons per day. We sell water to one
customer, Belize Water Services Limited, which then distributes the water
through its own distribution system to residential, commercial and tourist
properties on Ambergris Caye. During 2009, we supplied approximately 152 million
U.S. gallons (2008: 155 million U.S. gallons) of water to our Bulk water
customer in Belize.
British
Virgin Islands
We hold
an equity position in, and shared management of, OC-BVI. This affiliate produces
potable water from two reverse osmosis seawater conversion plants in Tortola,
British Virgin Islands. These plants have a total installed capacity of 2.4
million U.S. gallons per day and provide water to the Department of Water and
Sewerage of the Ministry of Communications and Works of the Government of the
British Virgin Islands. OC-BVI’s third plant, located on the island of Jost van
Dyke, has a capacity of 60,000 U.S. gallons per day and provides potable water
to the Department of Water and Sewerage of the British Virgin Islands
Government. During 2009, OC-BVI supplied approximately 531 million U.S. gallons
(2008: 536 million U.S. gallons) of water to its customer.
Bermuda
In June
2006, we formed a Bermuda-based affiliate, CW-Bermuda with two other
shareholders. We own 40% of the equity interest and voting rights of CW-Bermuda.
CW-Bermuda entered into a contract with the Government of Bermuda for the
design, construction, sale and operation of a desalination plant in two phases,
located on Tynes Bay along the northern coast of Bermuda. The plant was
completed at the end of 2008 and began operating during the second quarter of
2009. We expect to operate the plant until mid 2011.
We have
entered into a management services agreement with CW-Bermuda for the design,
construction and operation of the Tynes Bay plant, under which we receive fees
for direct services, purchasing activities and proprietary
technology.
Critical
Accounting Estimates
The
preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires us to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting period. Our actual results could differ
significantly from such estimates and assumptions.
Certain
of our accounting estimates or assumptions constitute “critical accounting
estimates” for us due to the fact that:
|
•
|
the
nature of these estimates or assumptions is material due to the levels of
subjectivity and judgment necessary to account for highly uncertain
matters or the susceptibility of such matters to change;
and
|
|
•
|
the
impact of the estimates and assumptions on financial condition and results
of operations is material.
|
Our
critical accounting estimates relate to (i) the valuation of our equity
investment in our affiliate, OC-BVI; (ii) goodwill and intangible assets; and
(iii) plant construction revenues and costs.
Valuation of Equity Investment in
Affiliate. We account for our investment in OC-BVI under the equity
method of accounting for investments in common stock. This
method requires recognition of a loss on an equity investment that is other than
temporary, and indicates that a current fair value of an equity investment that
is less than its carrying amount may indicate a loss in the value of the
investment. OC-BVI’s on-going dispute with the BVI government relating to its
Baughers Bay plant may indicate that the current fair value of our investment in
OC-BVI is less than our carrying value for this investment.
As a
quoted market price for OC-BVI’s stock is not available, to test for possible
impairment of our investment in OC-BVI we estimate its fair value by calculating
the expected cash flows from our investment in OC-BVI by (i) identifying various
possible outcomes of the Baughers Bay dispute; (ii) estimating the cash flows
associated with each possible outcome, and (iii) assigning a probability to each
outcome based upon discussions held to date by OC-BVI’s management with the BVI
government and OC-BVI’s legal counsel. The resulting probability weighted sum
represents the expected cash flows, and our best estimate of future cash flows,
to be derived from our investment in OC-BVI.
The
identification of the possible outcomes for the Baughers Bay dispute, the
projections of cash flows for each outcome, and the assignment of relative
probabilities to each outcome all represent significant estimates made by us.
While we have used our best judgment to identify the possible outcomes and
expected cash flows for these outcomes and assign relative probabilities to each
outcome, these estimates are by their nature highly subjective and are also
subject to material change by our management over time based upon additional
information from OC-BVI’s management and legal counsel, a change in the status
of negotiations and/or OC-BVI’s litigation with the BVI government. After
considering the September and October 2009 rulings of the Eastern Supreme Court
of the Caribbean relating to the Baughers Bay dispute, we determined that the
carrying value of our investment in OC-BVI exceeded the estimated fair value for
our investment in OC-BVI by approximately $160,000 as of September 30,
2009 and therefore recognized an impairment loss of this amount on this
investment during the three months ended September 30, 2009. In
February 2010, the BVI government announced that it had signed a 16 year
contract with Biwater, PLC for the construction and operation of a water plant
with a production capacity of 2.75 million U.S. gallons per day. This
new plant will provide potable water to the greater Tortola area and we believe
will replace the current production of the Baughers Bay plant. As a
result of the decision by the BVI government to enter into the agreement with
Biwater PLC, we now believe it unlikely that OC-BVI will derive any significant
future revenues from an operating contract for the Baughers Bay
plant. Consequently, we determined that an additional impairment loss
of $(4,500,000) was required (and was recorded) during the fourth quarter of
2009 to reduce our investment in OC-BVI to its estimated fair
value.
The
Appellate Court could ultimately overturn the ruling of the Court requiring the
BVI government to pay OC-BVI at the rate of $13.91 per thousand imperial gallons
for water previously supplied. If this occurs, the actual
cash flows from OC-BVI will vary materially from the expected cash flows we used
in determining OC-BVI’s fair value as of December 31, 2009, and we would be
required to record an additional loss to reduce the carrying value of our
investment in OC-BVI. Such impairment loss would reduce our earnings and could
have a material adverse impact on our results of operations and financial
condition.
Goodwill and other intangible
assets. Goodwill represents the excess costs over fair value of the
assets of an acquired business. Goodwill and intangible assets acquired in a
business combination accounted for as a purchase and determined to have an
indefinite useful life are not amortized, but are tested for impairment at least
annually. Generally accepted accounting principles require
the amortization of intangible assets with estimable useful lives over their
respective estimated useful lives to their estimated residual values, and
reviewed for impairment periodically. We evaluate the possible
impairment of goodwill annually. Management identifies our reporting
units and determines the carrying value of each reporting unit by assigning the
assets and liabilities, including the existing goodwill and intangible assets,
to those reporting units. We determine the fair value of each reporting unit by
calculating the expected cash flows from each reporting unit and compare the
fair value to the carrying amount of the reporting unit. To the extent the
carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds the fair value of the reporting
unit, we are required to perform the second step of the impairment test, as this
is an indication that the reporting unit goodwill may be impaired. In this step,
we compare the implied fair value of the reporting unit goodwill with the
carrying amount of the reporting unit goodwill. The implied fair value of
goodwill is determined by allocating the fair value of the reporting unit to all
the assets (recognized and unrecognized) and liabilities of the reporting unit
in a manner similar to a purchase price allocation. The residual fair value
after this allocation is the implied fair value of the reporting unit goodwill.
If the implied fair value is less than its carrying amount, the impairment loss
is recorded. Based upon our annual tests to date, we have not experienced any
impairment losses on our recorded amounts of goodwill.
Plant construction revenue and cost
of plant construction revenue. We recognize revenue and related costs as
work progresses on fixed price contracts for the construction of desalination
plants to be sold to third parties using the percentage-of-completion method,
which relies on contract revenue and estimates of total expected costs. We
follow this method since we can make reasonably dependable estimates of the
revenue and costs applicable to various stages of a contract. Under the
percentage-of-completion method, we record revenue and recognize profit or loss
as work on the contract progresses. Our engineering personnel estimate total
project costs and profit to be earned on each long term, fixed price contract
prior to commencement of work on the contract and update these estimates as work
on the contract progresses. The cumulative amount of revenue recorded on a
contract at a specified point in time is that percentage of total estimated
revenue that incurred costs to date comprise of estimated total contract costs.
As work progresses, if the actual contract costs exceed estimates, the profit
recognized on revenue from that contract decreases. We recognize the full amount
of any estimated loss on a contract at the time the estimates indicate such a
loss. To date we have not experienced a material adverse variation from our cost
estimates for plants constructed for sale to third parties.
We assume
the risk that the costs associated with constructing the plant may be greater
than we anticipated in preparing our bid. However, the terms of each of the
sales contracts with our customers require us to guarantee the sales price for
the plant at the bid amount. Because we base our contracted sales price in part
on our estimation of future construction costs, the profitability of our plant
sales is dependent on our ability to estimate these costs accurately. The cost
estimates we prepare in connection with the construction of plants to be sold to
third parties are subject to inherent uncertainties. The cost of materials and
construction may increase significantly after we submit our bid for a plant due
to factors beyond our control, which could cause the gross margin for a plant to
be less than we anticipated when the bid was made. The profit margin we
initially expect to generate from a plant sale could be further affected by
other factors, such as hydro-geologic conditions at the plant site that differ
materially from those we believed existed and relied upon when we submitted our
bid.
Quarterly
Results of Operations
The
following table presents unaudited quarterly results of operations for the eight
quarters ended December 31, 2009. We believe that all necessary adjustments,
consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, have been included in the
amounts stated below to present fairly such quarterly information.
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
2009
|
|
|
|
First
Quarter
|
|
|
Second
Quarter
|
|
|
Third
Quarter
|
|
|
Fourth
Quarter
|
|
Total
revenues
|
|
$ |
15,864,055 |
|
|
$ |
15,454,998 |
|
|
$ |
13,526,059 |
|
|
$ |
13,174,405 |
|
Gross
profit
|
|
|
5,980,500 |
|
|
|
7,587,053 |
|
|
|
5,036,068 |
|
|
|
4,395,456 |
|
Net
income (loss)
|
|
|
2,550,158 |
|
|
|
3,867,616 |
|
|
|
657,900 |
|
|
|
(977,103 |
) |
Diluted
earnings per share
|
|
|
0.18 |
|
|
|
0.26 |
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
|
(0.07 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
2008
|
|
|
|
First
Quarter
|
|
|
Second
Quarter
|
|
|
Third
Quarter
|
|
|
Fourth
Quarter
|
|
Total
revenues
|
|
$ |
14,291,562 |
|
|
$ |
17,842,585 |
|
|
$ |
17,204,593 |
|
|
$ |
16,340,219 |
|
Gross
profit
|
|
|
4,536,058 |
|
|
|
4,907,175 |
|
|
|
4,625,261 |
|
|
|
4,565,349 |
|
Net
income
|
|
|
1,673,867 |
|
|
|
1,979,623 |
|
|
|
1,780,017 |
|
|
|
1,776,209 |
|
Diluted
earnings per share
|
|
|
0.12 |
|
|
|
0.14 |
|
|
|
0.12 |
|
|
|
0.12 |
|
Results
of Operations
The
following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of
operations should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial
statements and accompanying notes included under Part II, Item 8 of this Annual
Report.
Year
Ended December 31, 2009 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2008
Consolidated
Results
Net
income attributable to controlling interests for the year ended
December 31, 2009 was $6,098,571 ($0.42 per share on a fully-diluted
basis) as compared to $7,209,716 ($0.50 per share on a fully-diluted basis) for
the year ended December 31, 2008. Our results for both of these years were
adversely affected by the losses we recorded for our equity investment in OC-BVI
which amounted to $(5,685,968) and $(2,345,612) for 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
Total
revenues for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 were $58,019,517 and
$65,678,959, respectively. The decrease in consolidated revenues from
2008 to 2009 reflects lower revenues for our bulk and services segments. Gross
profit for the year ended December 31, 2009 was $22,999,077 or 40% of total
revenues, as compared to $18,633,843 or 28% of total revenues, for the year
ended December 31, 2008. All three segments reported increased gross profits for
2009 as compared to 2008. For further discussion of revenues and
gross profit for the year ended December 31, 2009, see the “Results by Segment”
analysis that follows.
General
and administrative (“G&A”) expenses on a consolidated basis were $10,101,257
for the year ended December 31, 2009 as compared to $8,789,185 for 2008.
Increases in (i) employee costs of approximately $585,000 attributable to salary
increases, incremental hires, accrued bonuses and stock option compensation;
(ii) professional fees of approximately $63,000; (iii) insurance expenses
of $94,000 due to higher premiums; (iv) bank charges of approximately
$158,000 resulting from our Bahamas subsidiary’s conversion
of Bahamian dollars to U.S. dollars and the subsequent transfer of
such dollars to other Company bank accounts; and (v) costs incurred of
approximately $90,000 to bid new projects constituted the majority of the
additional G&A expense for 2009. Our G&A expense for 2009 also includes
approximately $183,000 in penalties and interest assessed against our Belize
subsidiary for delinquent business taxes. These penalties and
interest arose because we were erroneously informed in the past that our Belize
subsidiary was not subject to these taxes.
Interest
income decreased, from $1,393,691 in 2008 to $917,330 in 2009, as a result of a
reduction in the rates of interest earned on the average balances invested in
interest bearing deposit accounts.
See
further discussion of the OC-BVI situation at “Liquidity and Capital Resources —
Material Commitments, Contingencies and Expenditures — OC-BVI Contract Dispute
..”
Results by
Segment
Retail
Segment:
The
retail segment contributed $5,212,180 to our income from operations for the year
ended December 31, 2009, as compared to $4,652,610 for the year ended December
31, 2008.
Revenues
generated by our retail water operations were $23,239,756 and $22,369,806 for
the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The volume
of water sold increased by 4% in 2009 from 2008. This increase in
volume and inflation index related increases in base water rates that went
into effect during the first quarter of 2009 served to offset a decrease of
approximately $1,014,000 in revenues attributable to our pass-through billing of
energy costs to our customers, as energy prices declined significantly from 2008
to 2009.
Retail
segment gross profit was $13,427,322 (58% of revenues) and $11,803,059 (53% of
revenues) for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. The retail segment’s gross profit percentage in 2009
benefited from a reduction in certain operating and maintenance costs, lower
energy prices and inflation index related increases in base water rates
that went into effect in the first quarter of 2009.
Consistent with prior periods, we record all non-direct G&A
expenses in our retail business segment and do not allocate any of these
non-direct costs to our other two business segments. Retail G&A expenses for
the year ended December 31, 2009 were $8,215,142, up $1,064,693 from the
$7,150,449 in G&A expenses for the year ended December 31, 2008. Employee
costs for 2009 exceeded those for 2008 by approximately $615,000 due to salary
increases, new hires, accrued bonuses and stock option expense . Costs incurred
in connection with bidding for new projects in 2009 exceeded such costs for 2008
by approximately $90,000 and professional fees for 2009 were approximately
$63,000 higher than for 2008.
Bulk
Segment:
The bulk
segment contributed $4,078,781 and $3,184,107 to our income from operations for
the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Bulk
segment revenues in 2009 and 2008 were $25,905,077 and $30,121,536,
respectively. Total gallons of water sold by the bulk segment increased by 2% in
2009 from 2008. However, revenues from the bulk segment decreased
from 2008 to 2009 due to a reduction in energy costs passed through to our
customers, as diesel and electricity prices were significantly lower in 2009
than in 2008.
Gross
profit for our bulk segment was $5,755,108 and $4,563,704 for the years ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Gross profit as a percentage of bulk
revenues was 22% for 2009 and 15% for 2008. Approximately $778,000 of the
increase from 2008 to 2009 in bulk gross profits is attributable to our Cayman
operations, which benefited from (i) the expiration of the original contract for
the Red Gate plant and the elimination of approximately $400,000 in amortization
expense for the intangible asset associated with this contract; and (ii) the
annual inflation index related increases in base water rates that went into
effect during the first quarter of 2009. Our Bahamas operations
generated approximately $264,000 more in gross profits in 2009 than 2008 as a
result of improved operating efficiencies for our Windsor operations located in
Nassau, New Providence. We constructed and commissioned new feed water wells and
replaced the reverse osmosis membranes on 50% of our production trains at our
Windsor plant effective September 2008 and replaced the reverse osmosis
membranes on the remaining production trains at the Windsor plant during the
quarter ended June 30, 2009. These capital expenditures improved the
energy efficiency of the Windsor plant. In addition, last year we
implemented an improved feed water pretreatment regime at our Blue Hills plant
in Nassau which has reduced electrical power consumption at that plant.
Our overall bulk segment gross profit percentage for 2009 also benefited
from a reduction in diesel and electricity prices.
Bulk
segment G&A expenses for the year ended December 31, 2009 increased to
$1,676,327 from $1,379,597 for the same period in 2008 primarily as a
result of approximately $183,000 in penalties and interest assessed to our
Belize operations during the first quarter of 2009 relating to delinquent
business taxes (these penalties and interest arose because we were erroneously
informed in the past that our Belize subsidiary was not subject to these
taxes).and an increase in bank charges of approximately $158,000 resulting from
our Bahamas subsidiary’s conversion of Bahamian dollars to U.S.
dollars and the subsequent transfer of such dollars to other Company bank
accounts
Services
Segment:
The
services segment contributed $3,606,859 and $2,007,941 to our income from
operations for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
Revenues
from services provided in 2009 were $8,874,684 as compared to $13,187,617 in
2008. Services revenues decreased from 2008 to 2009 due to relatively
lower project construction activity in 2009. The decline in project
revenues in 2009 was partially offset by fees from our services
contract for the Tynes Bay, Bermuda plant, which commenced during the
second quarter of 2009.
The
increase in gross profit for the services segment to $3,816,647 in 2009 from
$2,267,080 in 2008 reflects incremental revenues arising from the commencement
during the second quarter of 2009 of our contract to operate the Tynes Bay,
Bermuda plant and downward adjustments made during the second quarter of 2009 of
our estimated costs to complete the North Side Water Works (NSWW) and Bermuda
plants. These downward adjustments of estimated costs to complete
increased the percentages of completion to date on these projects, thus we
recorded a cumulative upward adjustment to construction revenues. Both the NSWW
and Bermuda projects were accepted by the customers as of June 30,
2009.
G&A
expenses for the services segment were $209,788 and $259,139 for 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
Year
Ended December 31, 2008 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2007
Consolidated
Results
Net
income attributable to controlling interests was $7,209,716 ($0.50 per share on
a fully-diluted basis) for the year ended December 31, 2008 as compared to
$11,387,651 ($0.79 per share on a fully-diluted basis) for the year ended
December 31, 2007. The variation in the amount we recognized in our results of
operations relating to our equity investment in our affiliate OC-BVI was the
primary factor for our decline in net income from 2007 to 2008.
Total
revenues for the year ended December 31, 2008 increased to $65,678,959 from
$54,076,865 for the year ended December 31, 2007 due to an increase in bulk
water revenues and revenues from plant construction contracts. Gross profit for
the year ended December 31, 2008 was $18,633,843, or 28% of total revenues, as
compared to $18,684,226, or 35%, for the previous year. For further discussion
of revenues and gross profit for the year ended December 31, 2008, see the
“Results by Segment” analysis that follows.
General
and administrative (“G&A”) expenses were $8,789,185 and $9,478,308 on a
consolidated basis for 2008 and 2007, respectively. During 2008, we changed the
bonus arrangements for our executive management. Consequently, consolidated
compensation expense declined from 2007 to 2008 by approximately $376,000 due to
a reduction of approximately $911,000 in bonuses paid to our Chairman and our
Chief Executive Officer. We also lowered professional fees by approximately
$399,000 from 2007 to 2008 by reducing our use of consultants. Offsetting these
cost reductions was an increase of approximately $166,000 in insurance expense,
reflecting an increase in premiums.
Interest
income for 2008 was $1,393,691, down $518,000 from 2007 due to a decrease in
both the average balance of funds invested and the rates earned on such
balances.
Due to
OC-BVI’s inability to resolve its on-going contractual dispute with the BVI
government relating to its Baughers Bay plant, we changed our policy for
recognizing the results of this affiliate effective January 1, 2008.
Consequently, we reported a loss from our investment in OC-BVI for the year
ended December 31, 2008 of approximately $(2,346,000). For the year ended
December 31, 2007, our equity in the earnings of OC-BVI was approximately
$1,663,000 and we earned approximately $652,000 on our profit sharing agreement
for OC-BVI. See further discussion of the OC-BVI situation at “Liquidity and
Capital Resources — Material Commitments, Contingencies and Expenditures — OC-BVI Contract
Dispute.”
Results by
Segment
Retail Segment:
The
retail segment contributed $4,652,610 to our income from operations in 2008 as
compared to $4,472,237 in 2007.
Revenues
generated by our retail water operations were $22,369,806 and $22,225,765 for
2008 and 2007, respectively. Total U.S. gallons sold by retail operations
decreased by approximately 4% from 2007 to 2008. The increase in retail revenues
for 2008, despite the decrease in volume of water sold, is attributable to
energy cost increases billed to customers which in 2008 exceeded by
approximately $939,000 the comparable amounts billed to customers in
2007.
The
retail segment generated gross profit of $11,803,059 (53% of revenues) in 2008
as compared to $12,294,829 (55% of revenues) in 2007. The slightly lower gross
profit in 2008 results from the decrease in plant utilization.
Consistent
with prior periods, we record all non-direct G&A expenses in our retail
business segment and do not allocate any of these non-direct costs to our other
two business segments. Retail G&A expenses for 2008 were $7,150,449, down
$672,143 from 2007. During 2008 we changed the bonus arrangements for our
executive management. Consequently, consolidated compensation expense declined
from 2007 to 2008 by approximately $419,000 due to a reduction of approximately
$911,000 in bonuses paid to our Chairman and our Chief Executive Officer. We
also lowered professional fees by approximately $191,000 from 2007 to 2008 by
reducing our use of consultants.
Bulk Segment:
The bulk
segment contributed $3,184,107 to our income from operations in 2008, as
compared to $2,803,738 in 2007.
Revenues
from our bulk segment for the year ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 were
$30,121,536 and $24,320,392, respectively. Revenues from the bulk segment grew
from 2007 to 2008 due to increased revenues for our operations in the Bahamas
and Grand Cayman of approximately $3,999,000 and $1,527,000, respectively. The
additional revenues in 2008 for our Bahamas operations result from water
produced and invoiced by our Blue Hills plant and from an increase in diesel and
electricity pass-through charges. In 2007, we provided a comparable amount of
water from our Blue Hills plant but did not invoice for the equivalent of 1.2
million U.S. gallons per day for the first six months of 2007 due to our
commitment under our non-revenue water (“NRW”) agreement with the WSC. The
additional revenues in 2008 for our Grand Cayman operations result primarily
from an increase in diesel and electricity pass-through charges.
Gross
profit for our bulk segment was $4,563,704 and $4,241,634 for the year ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Gross profit as a percentage of bulk
revenues was 15% for the year ended December 31, 2008 and 17% for the year ended
December 31, 2007. In 2007, we incurred approximately $427,000 in variable
production costs for NRW we supplied from our Blue Hills plant which were not
incurred in 2008. Our gross profit in 2008 for our bulk segment was adversely
impacted by our Bahamas operations due to additional diesel costs for our
Windsor plant. Our contracts with the WSC allow us to invoice increases in
diesel costs to the WSC if our plants are operating at or better than the
efficiency specified in the contracts. In early 2006, we reconfigured the
Windsor plant in order to mitigate membrane fouling. However, this
reconfiguration resulted in a decrease in the fuel efficiency of the Windsor
plant to a level below that required under our contract with the WSC and as a
result, we could not charge a portion of the Windsor plant’s diesel costs to the
WSC. The impact of this inefficiency was exacerbated by a 70.2% rise in diesel
fuel prices over the first nine months of 2008 as compared to same period of
2007. Consequently, our diesel costs for the Windsor plant for the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 exceeded the amount that could be billed to the WSC by
approximately $638,000. We constructed and commissioned new feed water wells and
replaced the reverse osmosis membranes on two of four of our production trains
effective September 2008. These improvements have allowed us to reverse the
plant reconfiguration, and the results for the fourth quarter of 2008 indicate
that the Windsor plant’s fuel efficiency has improved. However, the gross profit
for our Bahamas operations may continue to be adversely affected by its diesel
costs if these improvements do not maintain the efficiency of the plant at the
minimum required by contract. Our gross profit in 2008 was also adversely
impacted by our Belize operations due to a fixed asset write-off of
approximately $82,000.
Bulk
segment G&A expenses for, 2008 and 2007 were $1,379,597 and $1,437,896
respectively. The reduction in G&A expenses from 2007 to 2008 primarily
reflects a $172,000 reduction in consultant fees.
Services
Segment:
The
services segment contributed $2,007,941 and $1,929,943 to our income from
operations years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Revenues
from services were $13,187,617 for the year ended December 31, 2008 as compared
to $7,530,708 for the same period in 2007. Services revenues increased from 2007
to 2008 due to higher relative project construction expenditures in
2008.
Gross
profit for the year ended December 31, 2008 increased to $2,267,080 from
$2,147,763 for the same period in 2007. Gross profit in 2008 was reduced by a
write-off of approximately $177,000 relating to a damaged diesel generator that
was leased to our Windsor plant in the Bahamas by our services segment.
Additionally, the gross profit for our services segment no longer benefits from
our former Barbados service contract which expired in June 2007. Our Barbados
gross profit amounted to approximately $114,000 for the year ended December 31,
2007.
G&A
expenses for the services segment were $259,139 and $217,820 for 2008 and 2007,
respectively.
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Overview
Our
sources of cash are (i) revenues generated from our retail license, plant
operating contracts and management agreements; (ii) borrowings under
term loans, credit facilities and debt securities; and (iii) sales of equity
securities.
Our cash
flows from operations are affected by tourism, rainfall patterns, weather
conditions (such as hurricanes), changes in our customer base, the timing and
level of rate increases, overall economic conditions and other factors and the
timing of the collection of these revenues from our customers.
Our
ability to access the debt and equity capital markets is impacted by our current
and anticipated financial results, financial condition; existing level of
borrowings; credit rating, and terms of debt agreements (including our
compliance therewith), and by conditions in the debt and equity
markets.
Our
primary uses of cash other than for operations are construction costs and
capital expenditures, including plant expansion and new plant construction.
Other significant uses include payment of dividends, repayment of debt and
pursuit of new business opportunities.
We have
generated approximately $31.3 million in net cash from our operating activities
over the last three years. As of December 31, 2009, we had cash
balances totaling approximately $44.4 million and working capital of
approximately $50.5 million. We believe our cash on hand and cash to
be generated from operations will be sufficient to meet our liquidity
requirements for the next 12 months. These requirements include
approximately $2,100,000 in principal and interest payments on debt, capital
expenditures of approximately $1,378,000, and quarterly dividends, if declared
by our Board. Our dividend payments amounted to approximately
$3,997,000 in 2009.
We are
not presently aware of anything that would lead us to believe that we will not
have sufficient liquidity to meet our needs for 2011 and
thereafter.
Discussion
of Cash Flows for the Year Ended December 31, 2009
Our cash
and cash equivalents increased to $44,429,190 as of December 31, 2009 from
$36,261,345 as of December 31, 2008.
Cash
Flows from Operating Activities
Operating
activities provided net cash for the year ended December 31, 2009 of
$15,471,092. This cash provided reflects net income generated for the
year of $6,098,571 as adjusted for (i) various items included in the
determination of net income that do not affect cash flows during the year and
(ii) changes in the other components of working capital. The more significant of
such items for 2009 included depreciation and amortization of approximately $6.4
million, the impairment of the investment in OC-BVI of approximately $4.7
million and a net increase in accounts receivable during the year of
approximately $2.2 million.
Cash
Flows Used in Investing Activities
Our
investing activities used $951,927 in net cash during the year ended December
31, 2009. Approximately $600,000 was used to fund expansion of new desalination
plant at the Abel Castillo Water Works location Harbour, and we has
miscellaneous other property additions of approximately $1.1
million. We collected $1,608,567 on our loans receivable.
Cash
Flows Used in Financing Activities
Our
financing activities used $6,351,320 in net cash during the year ended December
31, 2009. During the year, we made $1,361,267 in scheduled payments
on our debt and paid dividends of $4,999,514.
Financial
Position
Accounts
receivable as of December 31, 2009 were approximately $10 million, down almost
$4 million from December 31, 2008. This decrease is due to WSC’s more timely
payment of amounts invoiced by CW-Bahamas.
The
balance of costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings — construction
project of approximately $1.9 million as of December 31, 2009 represents
revenues earned to date on the construction of the Red Gate plant for the Water
Authority — Cayman. This receivable balance is non-current as it will be paid by
the Water Authority — Cayman through the issuance of a long term note to us upon
the commissioning of the plant. The decrease in this balance from the
prior year is due to the completion and sale of the North Side Water Works plant
to the WAC in 2009.
Borrowings
Outstanding
As of
December 31, 2009, we had total borrowings outstanding aggregating $21,129,267,
all of which consisted of bonds payable.
5.95% Secured
Bonds
In August
2006, we issued $15,771,997 principal amount secured fixed rate bonds in a
private offering and received net proceeds (excluding issuance costs and after
the offering discount) of $14,445,720. These bonds bear interest at a rate of
5.95%, are repayable in quarterly principal and interest installments of
$526,010, and mature in 2016. We have the right to redeem the bonds in full at
any time after August 4, 2009 at a premium of 1.5% of the outstanding principal
and accrued interest on the bonds on the date of redemption. As of December 31,
2009, $11,626,534 in principal amount was outstanding on these secured bonds.
Our obligations under the bonds are secured by fixed and floating charges (i) on
all of our assets, including an equitable charge of all of the shares of Cayman
Water, and (ii) on all of Cayman Water’s assets including its real estate.
Cayman Water has also guaranteed our payment obligations under the
bonds.
The trust
deed for these bonds restricts our ability to enter into new borrowing
agreements or any new guarantees without prior approval of the trustee and
limits our capital expenditures, with the exception of capital expenditures to
be incurred on certain defined projects, to $2,000,000 annually without prior
approval by the trustee. The trust deed also contains financial covenants that
require us to maintain a debt service coverage ratio of not less than 1.25 to 1,
a ratio of long term debt to EBITDA (i.e. earnings before interest, taxes,
depreciation and amortization) for the 12 months preceding the ratio calculation
date not greater than 2.5 to 1 and a ratio of long term debt to equity equal to
or less than 1.5 to 1. As of December 31, 2009, we were in compliance with the
covenants under the trust.
CW-Bahamas
Series A Bonds
In July
2005, CW-Bahamas sold B$10,000,000 Series A bonds to Bahamian citizens and
permanent resident investors in The Bahamas to finance a portion of the
construction cost of its Blue Hills plant. These bonds mature on June 30, 2015
and accrue interest at the annual fixed rate of 7.5%. Interest is payable
quarterly. CW-Bahamas’ option to redeem the bonds in whole or in part without
penalty commenced June 30, 2008. We have guaranteed CW-Bahamas repayment
obligations upon an “event of default” as defined in the guarantee agreement. If
we pay any amounts pursuant to the guarantee, we will be subrogated to all
rights of the bondholders in respect of any such payments. The guarantee is a
general unsecured obligation junior to our other secured obligations. As of
December 31, 2009, B$10,000,000 of the Series A bonds was
outstanding.
CW-Bahamas
Credit Facility
CW-Bahamas
has a credit facility with Scotiabank of Canada that consists of a B$500,000
revolving working capital loan. The obligations under the credit facility are
secured by the assets of CW-Bahamas. Borrowings under the working capital loan
accrue interest at the Nassau Prime rate plus 1.50% per annum. As of December
31, 2009, no amounts were outstanding under this facility.
The
credit facility contains certain covenants applicable to CW-Bahamas, including
restrictions on additional debt, guarantees and sale of assets. The credit
facility limits the payment of dividends by CW-Bahamas to available cash flow
(as defined in the governing loan agreement). All obligations under the credit
facility are repayable on demand.
Material
Commitments, Expenditures and Contingencies
OC-BVI
Contract Dispute
In
October 2006, our affiliate OC-BVI notified us that the Ministry of
Communications and Works of the Government of the British Virgin Islands (the
“Ministry”) had asserted a purported right of ownership of the Baughers Bay
plant pursuant to the terms of the Water Supply Agreement between the parties
dated May 1990 (the “1990 Agreement”) and had invited OC-BVI to submit a
proposal for its continued involvement in the production of water at the
Baughers Bay plant in light of the Ministry’s planned assumption of ownership.
Under the
terms of the 1990 Agreement, upon the expiration of the initial seven year term
in May 1999, the agreement would automatically be extended for another seven
year term unless the Ministry provided notice, at least eight months prior to
such expiration, of its decision to purchase the plant from OC-BVI for
approximately $1.42 million.
In
correspondence between the parties from late 1998 through early 2000, the
Ministry indicated that the BVI government intended to purchase the plant but
would be amenable to negotiating a new water supply agreement, and that it
considered the 1990 Agreement to be in force on a monthly basis until
negotiations between the BVI government and OC-BVI were concluded. Occasional
discussions were held between the parties since 2000 without resolution of the
matter. OC-BVI has continued to supply water to the Ministry and expended
approximately $4.7 million between 1995 and 2003 to significantly expand the
production capacity of the plant beyond that contemplated in the 1990
Agreement.
OC-BVI
submitted a proposal to the Ministry in late 2006 to continue to supply water
from the Baughers Bay plant. The Ministry held discussions with
OC-BVI regarding a new contract but did not formally respond to OC-BVI’s
proposal. Early in 2007, the Ministry unilaterally took the position
that until such time as a new agreement was reached on the ownership of the
plant and the price for the water produced by the plant, the Ministry would only
pay that amount of OC-BVI’s billings that the Ministry purported constituted
OC-BVI’s costs of producing the water. OC-BVI responded to the Ministry that the
amount the Ministry proposed to pay was significantly less than OC-BVI’s
production costs. Payments made by the Ministry to OC-BVI since the Ministry’s
assumption of this reduced price have been sporadic. On November 15,
2007, OC-BVI issued a demand letter to the BVI government for approximately $6.2
million representing amounts that OC-BVI claimed were due by the BVI government
for water sold and delivered plus interest and legal fees. In response to
OC-BVI’s demand for payment, the BVI government issued a letter dated November
19, 2007 that reasserted its claim that ownership of the Baughers Bay plant has
passed to the BVI government and rejected OC-BVI’s claim for
payment. On November 22, 2007, OC-BVI’s management was informed that
the BVI government had filed a lawsuit with the Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court
(the “Court”) seeking ownership of the Baughers Bay plant. OC-BVI
counterclaimed that it was entitled to continued possession and operation of the
Baughers Bay plant until the BVI government paid OC-BVI approximately $4.7
million, which it believes represents the value of the Baughers Bay plant at its
present expanded production capacity. OC-BVI took the legal position that since
the BVI government never paid the $1.42 million to purchase the Baughers Bay
plant, the 1990 agreement terminated on May 31, 1999, which was eight months
after the date that the Ministry provided written notice of its intention to
purchase the plant.
On July
4, 2008, OC-BVI filed a claim with the Court seeking recovery of $7,806,629,
representing amounts owed to OC-BVI for water sold and delivered to the BVI
government through May 31, 2008, $842,188 for interest accrued on amounts owed
as of May 31, 2008, and future interest and costs. This claim was
amended and increased on April 22, 2009 to $13,773,954 for amounts owed for
water delivered through March 31, 2009 plus accrued interest of $2,537,334 on
amounts owed as of March 31, 2009 plus future interest and costs. The
$13,773,954 amount represented amounts billed at the contract prices in effect
before the BVI government asserted its purported right of ownership of the
plant.
The Court
held a three-day trial from July 22 through July 24, 2009 to address both the
Baughers Bay ownership issue and OC-BVI’s claim for payment of amounts owed for
water sold and delivered to the BVI government. On September 17,
2009, the Court issued a preliminary ruling with respect to the litigation
between the BVI government and OC-BVI. The Court determined that the
BVI government was entitled to immediate possession of the Baughers Bay plant
and dismissed OC-BVI’s claim for compensation of approximately $4.7 million for
of expenditures made to expand the production capacity of the
plant. As a result of this determination by the Court, OC-BVI
recorded an impairment loss of approximately $2.1 million during the three
months ended September 30, 2009 for fixed assets associated with the Baughers
Bay plant. However, the Court determined that OC-BVI was entitled to
full payment of water invoices issued up to December 20, 2007, which had been
calculated under the terms of the original 1990 Agreement, and ordered the BVI
government to make an immediate interim payment of $5.0 million to OC-BVI for
amounts owed to OC-BVI. The Court deferred deciding the entire
dispute between the parties until it could conduct a hearing to determine the
reasonable rate for water produced by OC-BVI for the period from December 20,
2007 to the present.
After
conducting hearings on October 12 and 16, 2009, on October 28, 2009, the Court
ordered the BVI government to pay OC-BVI at the rate of $13.91 per thousand
imperial gallons for water produced by OC-BVI from December 20, 2007 to present,
which amounts to a total recovery for OC-BVI of $10.3 million as of September
30, 2009. The BVI government made a payment of $2.0 million to OC-BVI
under the Court order during the fourth quarter of 2009.
On
October 28, 2009, OC-BVI filed an appeal with the Eastern Caribbean Court of
Appeals (the “Appellate Court”) asking the Appellate Court to review the
September 17, 2009 ruling by the Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court as it relates
to OC-BVI’s claim for compensation for expenditures made to expand the
production capacity of the Baughers Bay plant.
On
October 29, 2009, the BVI government filed an appeal with the Appellate Court
seeking the Appellate Court’s review of the September 17, 2009 ruling of the
Court that the BVI government pay OC-BVI the reasonable rate for water produced
by OC-BVI for the period from December 20, 2007 to the present. The
BVI government is requesting a ruling from the Appellate Court that the BVI
government should only pay OC-BVI the actual cost of water produced at the
plant.
During
2007, OC-BVI completed, for a total cost of approximately $8.2 million, the
construction of a 700,000 U.S. gallons per day desalination plant located at Bar
Bay, Tortola (the “Bar Bay plant”). We provided OC-BVI with a $3.0 million loan
to fund part of this plant’s construction costs, of which $2.0 million remained
outstanding as of June 30, 2009. Principal on this loan was payable
in quarterly installments of $125,000 with a final balloon payment of $2.0
million due on August 31, 2009 and interest on the loan was due quarterly at the
rate of LIBOR plus 3.5%. In August 2009, we amended the terms of this loan with
OC-BVI, increasing its balance to $2,800,000 by converting $800,000 in trade
receivables due to us from OC-BVI. Under the terms of this
amendment, the interest rate on the loan was increased to the rate of LIBOR plus
5.5% and the maturity date for the final balloon payment extended to August 31,
2011. The terms for this loan were amended again in January 2010 to
increase the interest rate to LIBOR plus 7.5% as a result of OC-BVI’s inability
to comply with the loan covenant requiring OC-BVI to obtain a new contract for
Baughers Bay by December 31, 2009. On December 19, 2008, OC-BVI and the
BVI government executed a binding term sheet for the purchase of water by the
BVI government from OC-BVI’s Bar Bay plant. The parties intended the binding
term sheet to govern the terms of sale of water by OC-BVI to the BVI government
until the parties executed a definitive contract. On March 4, 2010, OC-BVI and
the BVI government executed the definitive contract for the Bar Bay plant (the
“Bar Bay Agreement”). Under the terms of the Bar Bay Agreement,
OC-BVI will deliver up to 600,000 U.S. gallons of water per day to the BVI
government from the Bar Bay plant and the BVI government will be obligated to
pay for this water at a specified price as adjusted by a monthly energy factor.
Prior to completion of the construction of the first phase of certain additional
facilities by OC-BVI in August 2009, the BVI government was not obligated to
purchase any minimum volumes of water from OC-BVI. However, since completion of
this first phase the BVI government has been obligated to purchase at least
600,000 gallons of water per day from the plant. The first phase of such
facilities construction involved the installation of water pipes from the plant
to a BVI government-owned reservoir site and from this site to the BVI
government’s piped water distribution system. A second phase of
construction requires OC-BVI to complete a storage reservoir on the BVI
government site within twelve months of the signing of the Bar Bay agreement.
The Bar Bay Agreement includes a seven-year extension option exercisable by the
BVI government.
Under
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles revenue is generally realized or
realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met:
|
•
|
Persuasive
evidence of an arrangement exists.
|
|
•
|
Delivery
has occurred or services have been
rendered.
|
|
•
|
The
seller’s price to the buyer is fixed and determinable;
and
|
|
•
|
Collectability
is reasonably assured.
|
Effective
January 1, 2008, OC-BVI changed its policy for the recording of its revenues
from the Baughers Bay plant from the accrual to the equivalent of the cash
method due to an inability to meet all of the above revenue recognition
criteria. As a result of this adjustment to OC-BVI’s revenues, we
recorded losses from our equity in OC-BVI’s results of operations for all fiscal
quarters of 2008 and for the first three quarters of
2009. Any cash payments made by the BVI government on
Baughers Bay related invoices were applied by OC-BVI to the remaining balance of
outstanding accounts receivable that arose from billings for periods prior to
and including December 2007 and thus were not recognized as
revenues. Sufficient payments were received from the BVI government
during the three months ended September 30, 2009 to repay the remaining accounts
receivable balances relating to period prior to December 31,
2007. OC-BVI continues to apply the equivalent of the cash method
with respect to the recognition of revenues from Baughers
Bay. Consequently, OC-BVI will not recognize as revenues any
amounts to be paid to OC-BVI as a result of the Court ruling until such
amounts are paid by the BVI government. The BVI government made a $2
million payment on the Court award during the fourth quarter of
2009. OC-BVI also applied the equivalent of the cash basis of
accounting for revenue recognition for its Bar Bay plant until such time as the
Bar Bay Agreement was signed.
In
February 2010 the BVI government announced that it had signed a 16 year contract
with Biwater, PLC for the construction and operation of a water plant with a
production capacity of 2.75 million U.S. gallons per day. This new
plant will provide potable water to the greater Tortola area and we believe will
replace the current production of the Baughers Bay plant.
We
account for our investment in OC-BVI in accordance with the equity method of
accounting for investments in common stock. This method requires recognition of
a loss on an equity investment that is other than temporary, and indicates that
a current fair value of an equity investment that is less than its carrying
amount may indicate a loss in the value of the investment. To test for possible
impairment of our investment in OC-BVI, we estimate its fair value as of the end
of each fiscal quarter. In making this estimate, we calculate the expected cash
flows from our investment in OC-BVI by (i) identifying various possible outcomes
of the Baughers Bay dispute and negotiations for a definitive contract on the
new Bar Bay plant; (ii) estimating the cash flows associated with each possible
outcome, and (iii) assigning a probability to each outcome based upon
discussions held to date by OC-BVI’s management with the BVI government and
OC-BVI’s legal counsel. The resulting probability-weighted sum represents the
expected cash flows, and our best estimate of future cash flows, to be derived
from our investment in OC-BVI. After considering the September and October 2009
rulings of the Court, we determined that the carrying value of our investment in
OC-BVI exceeded the estimated fair value for our investment in OC-BVI by
approximately $160,000 as of September 30, 2009 and therefore recognized an
impairment loss of this amount on this investment during the three months ended
September 30, 2009. As a result of the decision by the BVI
government to enter into the agreement with Biwater, we now believe it unlikely
that OC-BVI will derive any significant future revenues from an operating
contract for the Baughers Bay plant. Consequently, we determined that
an additional impairment loss of $(4,500,000) was required ( and was recorded)
during the fourth quarter of 2009 to reduce our investment in OC-BVI to its
estimated fair value.
The
Appellate Court could ultimately overturn the ruling of the Court requiring the
BVI government to pay OC-BVI at the rate of $13.91 per thousand imperial gallons
for water previously supplied. If this occurs the actual
cash flows from OC-BVI will vary materially from the expected cash flows we used
in determining OC-BVI’s fair value as of December 31, 2009 and we would be
required to record an additional impairment loss to reduce the carrying value of
our investment in OC-BVI. Such impairment loss would reduce our earnings and
could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations and financial
condition.
The
impairment losses we recorded in 2009 for our investment in OC-BVI reduced our
earnings and adversely affected our financial condition, but have no impact on
our liquidity or cash flows. The BVI
government has announced their intention to seek an interim one year contract
with OC-BVI for the operation of the Baughers Bay plant, but OC-BVI may not be
willing to enter into such a contract and may at any time elect to cease
operating the Baughers Bay plant. While OC-BVI has continued to
operate the Baughers Bay plant through the date of this filing, the BVI
government has paid OC-BVI only $2 million of the $10.3 million awarded by the
Court and has continued to pay OC-BVI for each thousand gallons supplied from
Baughers Bay at the rate of $6.88, rather than at the $13.91 rate deemed
equitable by the Court. OC-BVI continues to use the cash method for recognizing
any revenues from the Baughers Bay plant.
While
OC-BVI expects the contract for the operation of its Bar Bay plant to be
profitable, it may continue to report net losses (of which we will recognize
43%) during 2010 to the extent that (1) it elects to continue to operate the
Baughers Bay plant and (2) payments received from BVI government are
insufficient to cover its operating costs. We do not anticipate that our
investment in OC-BVI will adversely impact our liquidity in 2010.
Material
Expenditures and Commitments
The
following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of December 31,
2009:
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2011-2013
|
|
|
|
2014-2016
|
|
|
2017
and
Thereafter
|
|
Secured
5.95% bonds (1)(2)
|
|
$ |
14,202,269 |
|
|
$ |
2,104,040 |
|
|
$ |
6,312,120 |
|
|
$ |
5,786,110 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
Series
A bonds (1)
|
|
|
14,125,000 |
|
|
|
750,000 |
|
|
|
2,250,000 |
|
|
|
11,125,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Employment
agreements
|
|
|
1,529,850 |
|
|
|
1,141,650 |
|
|
|
388,200 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Operating
leases
|
|
|
386,589 |
|
|
|
314,634 |
|
|
|
71,955 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Other
|
|
|
306,810 |
|
|
|
276,915 |
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
(1)
|
Includes
interest costs to be incurred.
|
(2)
|
Secured
5.95% bonds are shown gross of
discount.
|
In
addition to the commitments in the table above, we estimate the costs as of
December 31, 2009 to complete the renovation of the Red Gate Road plant in Grand
Cayman to be approximately $1.3 million. We project these costs will all be
incurred in 2010.
CW-Bahamas
Liquidity
As of
December 31, 2009, CW-Bahamas was due approximately $5.4 million from the WSC.
We have been informed previously by representatives of the Bahamas government
that the delay in paying our accounts receivables is due to operating issues
within the WSC, that the delay does not reflect any type of dispute with us with
respect to the amounts owed, and that the amounts will ultimately be paid in
full. We have been informed by these representatives that monthly payments to
CW-Bahamas will continue from April 2010 through June 2010 in sufficient amounts
to meet current invoices and reduce the amount of the delinquent
receivables. Based upon these communications, we believe that the
accounts receivable from the WSC are fully collectible and therefore have not
provided any allowance for possible non-payment of these receivables as of
December 31, 2009.
Transfers
of U.S. dollars from CW-Bahamas to our other subsidiaries requires
authorization in advance from the Central Bank of the Bahamas.
CW-Bahamas
Performance Bonds
We have
two contracts, one for our Windsor plant and one for our Blue Hills plant, to
supply water to the WSC. Each contract requires us to guarantee delivery of a
minimum quantity of water per week. If we do not meet this minimum, we are
required to pay the WSC for the difference between the minimum and actual
gallons delivered at a per gallon rate equal to the price per gallon that WSC is
currently paying us under the contract. The Windsor and Blue Hills contracts
expire in 2013 and 2026, respectively and require us to deliver 14.0 million
imperial gallons and 28.0 million imperial gallons, respectively, of water each
week. We are required to provide the WSC with performance and operating
guarantees, in the form of bank-issued letters of credit, to secure any payments
we may be required to make under the minimum delivery requirements of these
contracts On August 1, 2009, a performance bond with the Royal Bank of Canada in
Nassau, Bahamas in the amount of $1,910,775 for the Windsor plant expired and
was not subsequently replaced. We expect to obtain performance bonds
for the Windsor and Blue Hills plants once CW-Bahamas has received payment of
its delinquent accounts receivable from the WSC.
Dividends
On
January 31, 2009, we paid a dividend of $0.065 to shareholders of record on
January 1, 2009.
On April
30, 2009, we paid a dividend of $0.065 to shareholders of record on April 1,
2009.
On July
31, 2009, we paid a dividend of $0.065 to shareholders of record on July 1,
2009.
On
October 31, 2009, we paid a dividend of $0.075 to shareholders of record on
October 1, 2009.
On
November 24, 2009, our Board declared a dividend of $0.075 payable on January
31, 2010 to shareholders of record on January 1, 2010.
We have
paid dividends to owners of our common shares and redeemable preference shares
since we began declaring dividends in 1985. Our payment of any future cash
dividends will depend upon our earnings, financial condition, cash flows,
capital requirements and other factors our Board deems relevant in determining
the amount and timing of such dividends.
Dividend Reinvestment and Common
Stock Purchase Plan.
This
program is available to our shareholders, who may reinvest all or a portion of
their common cash dividends into shares of common stock at prevailing market
prices and may also invest optional cash payments to purchase additional shares
at prevailing market prices as part of this program.
Impact
of Inflation
Under the
terms of our Cayman Islands license and our water sales agreements in Belize,
Bahamas and the British Virgin Islands, our water rates are automatically
adjusted for inflation on an annual basis, subject to temporary exceptions. We,
therefore, believe that the impact of inflation on our gross profit, measured in
consistent dollars, will not be material. However, significant increases in
items such as fuel and energy costs could create additional credit risks for us,
as our customers’ ability to pay our invoices could be adversely affected by
such increases.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE
DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK
Credit
Risk
We are
not exposed to significant credit risk on retail customer accounts in the Cayman
Islands, Bimini or the Bahamas, as our policy is to cease supply of water to
customers whose accounts are more than 45 days overdue. Our primary exposure to
credit risk is from accounts receivable arising from bulk water sales to the
governments of Belize, The Bahamas, The British Virgin Islands, and the Cayman
Islands.
As of
December 31, 2009, we had approximately $12.1 million in loans receivable due
from the Water Authority-Cayman and $2,675,000 in a loan receivable due from our
affiliate OC-BVI. Both of these loans were current as to scheduled
principal and interest payments as of December 31, 2009.
Interest
Rate Risk
We are
not exposed to significant interest rate risk as the annual interest rates on
our Series A bonds and 5.95% bonds are fixed at 7.5% and 5.95%,
respectively.
Foreign
Exchange Risk
All of
our foreign currencies have fixed exchange rates to the U.S. dollar. If any of
these fixed exchange rates become a floating exchange rate, however, our results
of operations could be adversely affected.
ITEM
8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY
DATA
|
Page
|
CONSOLIDATED
WATER CO. LTD.
|
|
INDEX
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
50
|
Consolidated
Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2009 and 2008
|
51
|
Consolidated
Statements of Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and
2007
|
52
|
Consolidated
Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2009,
2008 and 2007
|
53
|
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and
2007
|
54
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
55
|
Schedule
II, Valuation and Qualifying Accounts, is omitted because the information
is included in the financial statements and notes. |
|
OCEAN
CONVERSION (BVI) LTD
|
|
INDEX
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
75
|
Consolidated
Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2009 and 2008
|
76
|
Consolidated
Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and
2007
|
77
|
Consolidated
Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2009,
2008 and 2007
|
78
|
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and
2007
|
79
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
80
|
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of
Directors and Stockholders
Consolidated
Water Co. Ltd.
We have
audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Consolidated Water Co.
Ltd. as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements
of income, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2009. We also have audited Consolidated
Water Co. Ltd.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,
2009, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO). Consolidated Water Co. Ltd.’s management is responsible for these
financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial
reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements and an opinion on the Company’s internal
control over financial reporting based on our audits.
We
conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective
internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test
basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an
understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk
that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and
operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our
audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary
in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for
our opinions.
A
company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over
financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to
the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2)
provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to
permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are
being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of
the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s
assets that could have a material effect on the financial
statements.
Because
of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not
prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of
effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance
with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
As
discussed in Note 24 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company
adopted SFAS No. 160, Non-controlling Interests in
Consolidated Financial
Statements - an amendment of ARB No. 51, Consolidated Financial
Statements (incorporated into ASC Topic 810, Consolidation), effective January 2009.
In our
opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the consolidated financial position of Consolidated Water Co.
Ltd. as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the consolidated results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period
ended December 31, 2009 in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, Consolidated
Water Co. Ltd. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on criteria established
in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
/s/
MarcumRachlin, a division of Marcum LLP
Fort
Lauderdale, Florida
March 16,
2010
CONSOLIDATED
WATER CO. LTD.
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
(Expressed
in United States dollars)
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
44,429,190 |
|
|
$ |
36,261,345 |
|
Accounts
receivable, net
|
|
|
9,980,928 |
|
|
|
13,911,312 |
|
Inventory
|
|
|
1,832,564 |
|
|
|
1,617,484 |
|
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
1,689,874 |
|
|
|
1,444,445 |
|
Current
portion of loans receivable
|
|
|
1,216,098 |
|
|
|
768,803 |
|
Total
current assets
|
|
|
59,148,654 |
|
|
|
54,003,389 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property,
plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
60,245,525 |
|
|
|
58,937,980 |
|
Construction
in progress
|
|
|
1,000,882 |
|
|
|
6,157,958 |
|
Costs
and estimated earnings in excess of billings - construction
project
|
|
|
1,872,552 |
|
|
|
7,377,554 |
|
Inventory
non-current
|
|
|
3,352,054 |
|
|
|
2,971,949 |
|
Loans
receivable
|
|
|
10,875,848 |
|
|
|
1,560,420 |
|
Investment
in affiliate
|
|
|
9,157,995 |
|
|
|
14,371,312 |
|
Intangible
assets, net
|
|
|
1,919,656 |
|
|
|
2,144,162 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
3,587,754 |
|
|
|
3,587,754 |
|
Other
assets
|
|
|
3,314,861 |
|
|
|
3,544,096 |
|
Total
assets
|
|
$ |
154,475,781 |
|
|
$ |
154,656,574 |
|
LIABILITIES
AND EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
payable and other current liabilities
|
|
$ |
6,187,606 |
|
|
$ |
7,310,327 |
|
Dividends
payable
|
|
|
1,152,702 |
|
|
|
1,006,414 |
|
Current
portion of long term debt
|
|
|
1,322,483 |
|
|
|
1,229,071 |
|
Total
current liabilities
|
|
|
8,662,791 |
|
|
|
9,545,812 |
|
Long
term debt
|
|
|
19,806,784 |
|
|
|
21,129,269 |
|
Other
liabilities
|
|
|
465,408 |
|
|
|
430,717 |
|
Total
liabilities
|
|
|
28,934,983 |
|
|
|
31,105,798 |
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
Water Co. Ltd. stockholders’ equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redeemable
preferred stock, $0.60 par value. Authorized 200,000
shares;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
issued
and outstanding 17,192 and 17,366 shares, respectively
|
|
|
10,315 |
|
|
|
10,420 |
|
Class
A common stock, $0.60 par value. Authorized 24,655,000
shares;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
issued
and outstanding 14,541,878 and 14,529,360 shares,
respectively
|
|
|
8,725,127 |
|
|
|
8,717,616 |
|
Class
B common stock, $0.60 par value. Authorized 145,000
shares;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
none
issued or outstanding
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Additional
paid-in capital
|
|
|
80,990,686 |
|
|
|
80,461,942 |
|
Retained
earnings
|
|
|
34,365,640 |
|
|
|
32,340,077 |
|
Total
Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. stockholders’ equity
|
|
|
124,091,768 |
|
|
|
121,530,055 |
|
Noncontrolling
interests
|
|
|
1,449,030 |
|
|
|
2,020,721 |
|
Total
equity
|
|
|
125,540,798 |
|
|
|
123,550,776 |
|
Total
liabilities and equity
|
|
$ |
154,475,781 |
|
|
$ |
154,656,574 |
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
CONSOLIDATED
WATER CO. LTD.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Expressed
in United States dollars)
|
|
Year
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail
water revenues
|
|
$ |
23,239,756 |
|
|
$ |
22,369,806 |
|
|
$ |
22,225,765 |
|
Bulk
water revenues
|
|
|
25,905,077 |
|
|
|
30,121,536 |
|
|
|
24,320,392 |
|
Services
revenues
|
|
|
8,874,684 |
|
|
|
13,187,617 |
|
|
|
7,530,708 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
revenues
|
|
|
58,019,517 |
|
|
|
65,678,959 |
|
|
|
54,076,865 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
of retail revenues
|
|
|
9,812,434 |
|
|
|
10,566,747 |
|
|
|
9,930,936 |
|
Cost
of bulk revenues
|
|
|
20,149,969 |
|
|
|
25,557,832 |
|
|
|
20,078,758 |
|
Cost
of services revenues
|
|
|
5,058,037 |
|
|
|
10,920,537 |
|
|
|
5,382,945 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
cost of revenues
|
|
|
35,020,440 |
|
|
|
47,045,116 |
|
|
|
35,392,639 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
profit
|
|
|
22,999,077 |
|
|
|
18,633,843 |
|
|
|
18,684,226 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General
and administrative expenses
|
|
|
10,101,257 |
|
|
|
8,789,185 |
|
|
|
9,478,308 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
from operations
|
|
|
12,897,820 |
|
|
|
9,844,658 |
|
|
|
9,205,918 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
income
|
|
|
917,330 |
|
|
|
1,393,691 |
|
|
|
1,911,303 |
|
Interest
expense
|
|
|
(1,698,084 |
) |
|
|
(1,755,969 |
) |
|
|
(1,856,277 |
) |
Other
income
|
|
|
168,584 |
|
|
|
138,915 |
|
|
|
263,912 |
|
Equity
in earnings (loss) of affiliate
|
|
|
(1,025,968 |
) |
|
|
(2,345,612 |
) |
|
|
2,314,594 |
|
Impairment
of investment in affiliate
|
|
|
(4,660,000 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
income (expense), net
|
|
|
(6,298,138 |
) |
|
|
(2,568,975 |
) |
|
|
2,633,532 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income
|
|
|
6,599,682 |
|
|
|
7,275,683 |
|
|
|
11,839,450 |
|
Income
attributable to non-controlling interests
|
|
|
501,111 |
|
|
|
65,967 |
|
|
|
451,799 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income attributable to Consolidated Water Co. Ltd.
stockholders
|
|
$ |
6,098,571 |
|
|
$ |
7,209,716 |
|
|
$ |
11,387,651 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
earnings per common share attributable to Consolidated Water Co.
Ltd. common
stockholders
|
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
|
$ |
0.50 |
|
|
$ |
0.79 |
|
Diluted
earnings per common share attributable to Consolidated Water Co.
Ltd. common
stockholders
|
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
|
$ |
0.50 |
|
|
$ |
0.79 |
|
Dividends
declared per common share
|
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
$ |
0.325 |
|
|
$ |
0.195 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average number of common shares used in the determination
of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
earnings per share
|
|
|
14,535,192 |
|
|
|
14,519,847 |
|
|
|
14,404,732 |
|
Diluted
earnings per share
|
|
|
14,588,144 |
|
|
|
14,538,971 |
|
|
|
14,495,364 |
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
CONSOLIDATED
WATER CO. LTD.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(Expressed
in United States dollars)
|
|
Redeemable
preferred
stock
|
|
|
Common
stock
|
|
|
Additional
paid-in
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Non-controlling
|
|
|
Total
stockholders’
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Dollars
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Dollars
|
|
|
capital
|
|
|
earnings
|
|
|
interest
|
|
|
equity
|
|
Balance
as of December 31, 2006
|
|
|
24,971 |
|
|
$ |
14,983 |
|
|
|
14,132,860 |
|
|
$ |
8,479,716 |
|
|
$ |
76,071,710 |
|
|
$ |
21,278,246 |
|
|
$ |
1,495,755 |
|
|
$ |
107,340,410 |
|
Conversion
of preferred shares
|
|
|
(5,698 |
) |
|
|
(3,418 |
) |
|
|
5,698 |
|
|
|
3,418 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Issue
of share capital
|
|
|
1,809 |
|
|
|
1,085 |
|
|
|
368,928 |
|
|
|
221,358 |
|
|
|
3,666,117 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
3,888,560 |
|
Net
income
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
11,387,651 |
|
|
|
451,799 |
|
|
|
11,839,450 |
|
Dividends
declared
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(2,812,177 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(2,812,177 |
) |
Issue
of options
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
33,266 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
33,266 |
|
Capital
contributions
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
7,200 |
|
|
|
7,200 |
|
Balance
as of December 31, 2007
|
|
|
21,082 |
|
|
|
12,650 |
|
|
|
14,507,486 |
|
|
|
8,704,492 |
|
|
|
79,771,093 |
|
|
|
29,853,720 |
|
|
|
1,954,754 |
|
|
|
120,296,709 |
|
Issue
of share capital
|
|
|
1,735 |
|
|
|
1,041 |
|
|
|
16,423 |
|
|
|
9,853 |
|
|
|
447,995 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
458,889 |
|
Conversion
of preferred shares
|
|
|
(5,451 |
) |
|
|
(3,271 |
) |
|
|
5,451 |
|
|
|
3,271 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Net
income
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
7,209,716 |
|
|
|
65,967 |
|
|
|
7,275,683 |
|
Dividends
declared
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(4,723,359 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(4,723,359 |
) |
Issue
of options
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
242,854 |