UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
x ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013
o TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ___ until ___
Commission File Number 000-22573
AXION POWER INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| Delaware | 65-0774638 | |
| (State or other jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer | |
| incorporation organization) | Identification No.) | |
| 3601 Clover Lane | ||
| New Castle, Pennsylvania | 16105 | |
| (Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) | |
| Registrant’s telephone number, including area code | (724) 654-9300 | |
Securities Registered under Section 12(b) of the Act
None
Securities Registered under Section 12(g) of the Act
Common Stock, par value $.0001 per share
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ¨ No x
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨ No x
Indicate by check mark whether the issuer (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
| Large accelerated filer ¨ | Accelerated filer ¨ |
| Non-accelerated filer ¨ | Smaller reporting company x |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
The aggregate market value of the 118,198,330 shares of voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant based on the closing price on the OTCQX on June 28, 2013 was $17,113,992.
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
| Shares Outstanding | |
| Title of Class | February 28, 2014 |
| Common Stock | 205,261,452 |
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Definitive Proxy Statement for the 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by reference in Part III hereof.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
| PART I | 4 | ||
| Item 1. | Business. | 4 | |
| Item 1A. | Risk Factors. | 12 | |
| Item 2. | Properties. | 17 | |
| Item 3. | Legal Proceedings. | 17 | |
| Item 4. | Mine Safety Disclosures | 17 | |
| PART II | 17 | ||
| Item 5. | Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases Equity of Securities. | 17 | |
| Item 7. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. | 18 | |
| Item 8. | Financial Statements and Supplementary Data. | 28 | |
| Item 9. | Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure. | 47 | |
| Item 9A | Controls and Procedures. | 47 | |
| PART III | 48 | ||
| Item 10. | Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance. | 48 | |
| Item 11. | Executive Compensation. | 48 | |
| Item 12. | Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters. | 48 | |
| Item 13. | Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence. | 48 | |
| Item 14. | Principal Accountant Fees and Services. | 48 | |
| PART IV | 49 | ||
| Item 15. | Exhibits. | 49 |
| 3 |
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Information
This Annual Report on Form 10-K, in particular the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” contains certain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). These forward-looking statements represent our expectations, beliefs, intentions or strategies concerning future events, including, but not limited to, any statements regarding our assumptions about financial performance; the continuation of historical trends; the sufficiency of our cash balances for future liquidity and capital resource needs; the expected impact of changes in accounting policies on our results of operations, financial condition or cash flows; anticipated problems and our plans for future operations; and the economy in general or the future of the energy storage device industry, all of which are subject to various risks and uncertainties.
When used in this Annual Report on Form 10-K as well as in reports, statements, and information we have filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission” or “SEC”), in our press releases, presentations to securities analysts or investors, in oral statements made by or with the approval of an executive officer, the words or phrases “believes,” “may,” “will,” “expects,” “should,” “continue,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “will likely result,” “estimates,” “projects” or similar expressions and variations thereof are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. However, any statements contained in this periodic report that are not statements of historical fact may be deemed to be forward-looking statements. We caution that these statements by their nature involve risks and uncertainties, certain of which are beyond our control, and actual results may differ materially depending on a variety of important factors.
PART I
Item 1 Description of Business
The primary business of Axion Power International, Inc. (the “Company”, Axion, “we”, “our”, or “us”) is to develop, design, manufacture and sell advanced energy storage devices, components and systems that are based on our patented PbC® technology. We also manufacture standard and specialty lead-acid batteries. Our PbC batteries and battery components, which are manufactured primarily through the use of activated carbon as an alternative to lead in the battery’s negative electrode, have application to varied energy system storage functions.
The Energy Storage Industry
The energy storage industry has traditionally been based on battery, flywheel, capacitor, thermal, chemical systems, power to gas, gravity, pumped storage hydroelectricity, and compressed air systems, to provide a temporary or back-up source for energy. The major industries utilizing energy storage systems are automotive for stop/start, hybrid and electric vehicle applications, heavy duty truck and rail for hybrid applications, renewable energy for storage and smoothing, and electrical utilities for back-up, energy smoothing and frequency regulation.
Energy storage for vehicles, including stop/start technology, electric drive, hybrid electric cars, trucks and locomotives is a fundamental factor to improving vehicles’ economic, social, and environmental sustainability. The combination of high fuel costs and increasingly more stringent government regulation of emissions, fuel efficiency and mileage requirements for vehicles for passenger and freight transport, and other commercial applications, is a major impetus for the development of new green technologies.
The electric power sector’s demands for energy storage continue to increase. The amount of electricity which can be generated is relatively fixed over short periods of time, although demand for electricity fluctuates throughout the day. Energy storage devices and systems store electrical energy for use as required, even during periods when power is not generated. Electrical storage devices can manage the amount of power required to supply customers at times when need is greatest, which is typically during peak load. These devices assist in regulating the flow of power from renewable energy applications, like wind and solar power. The result is a system which is smoother and more dispatchable, which makes it easier for grid operators to control the power output from those sources. Energy storage devices and systems can also balance microgrids to achieve a good match between generation and load. They can provide frequency regulation, to maintain the balance between the network's load and power generated, and can achieve a more reliable power supply for high tech industrial facilities.
There are several revenue opportunities (e.g. peak shaving, load shifting, synchronized reserve, etc.) that can be accessed when a storage component is included in a renewable energy application. The greatest current rate of return is achieved when the storage asset is focused on the frequency regulation sector of the demand response market. Revenue rates are set per the Federal Regulatory Energy Commission’s (“FERC”) 'pay for performance' regulations ( FERC Order No. 755 adopted in 2011 and FERC Order No. 784 adopted in 2013), which means that systems that respond faster than other systems, and respond with measured accuracy within the parameter guidelines, will be paid at the highest revenue rate. Solar photovoltaic farms as a stand- alone system cannot effectively participate in the ancillary markets because of lack of availability (evening hours), intermittency and other factors. When a solar photovoltaic farm is combined with a storage source, we believe the revenue provided by the system, when augmented with tax subsidies, is increased by more than double when combined with participation in ancillary services such as frequency regulation. In addition, the storage system in this application can be a source of emergency power if the grid goes completely down.
| 4 |
Our Corporate History
Axion Power Corporation, our wholly owned subsidiary, was formed in September 2003 to acquire and develop certain innovative battery technology. Since inception Axion Power Corporation has been engaged in research and development (“R&D”) of new technology for the production of our PbC batteries. On December 31, 2003, Axion Power Corporation engaged in a reverse acquisition with Tamboril Cigar Company, a public shell company whereby Axion Power Corporation became a wholly owned subsidiary of Tamboril, which subsequently changed its name to Axion Power International, Inc.
In February 2006, we commenced operations at our Clover Lane facility in New Castle, PA. We have utilized this space to manufacture our PbC and specialty lead-acid battery products and to continue to produce and test prototypes which incorporate our developed technology. Our Clover Lane plant allows us to manufacture batteries for sale under the Axion brand name; to manufacture for third parties under specific contract arrangements; or to manufacture prototypes for our own use and testing, or for testing by our customers. Our facility has been fully tested and found to be in compliance with emission standards established by new federal guidelines in accordance with the Clean Air Act–Title III. In November 2010, we expanded into our Green Ridge facility, also in New Castle, PA, to house offices, research & development, electrode manufacturing and warehousing.
Since inception, our operations have been financed through the sale of equity and debt instruments to investors, as well as loans and proceeds from government grants, and with minimal revenue generated from our operations. We transitioned from an R&D - based development stage company to a commercial manufacturing company in the fourth quarter of 2012, and we believe that the transition is providing us with the growth opportunities to commercialize our PbC technology and thereby improve our financial condition, cash flow and market presence.
Development History
Since 2008, we have invested in upgrading, and where necessary, replacing existing battery manufacturing equipment in order to support our long range business plan. These early improvements included the installation of a new automatic paste mixer and a fixed orifice pasting line for improved quality and dimensional tolerances of battery plates, an automatic stacker for precise wrap and alignment of absorbed glass matt separator that is needed for the production of our premium PbC products, the modernization of our second lead-acid production line; the rebuild of five casting machines; the addition of new welding equipment; and a 35% expansion of our formation area. Subsequently, a new robotic carbon electrode manufacturing line was installed at our Green Ridge Road facility in New Castle, PA. These initiatives have provided the manufacturing framework and capability for improvements in our quality, cost and ability to deliver our products.
From March 2011 through 2013, we utilized our capability and capacity primarily to produce specialty lead-acid batteries for a third party. Shipments of these products generated sales of $8.6 million and $7.9 million, respectively, in 2013 and 2012. The flooded lead-acid batteries were manufactured in our facility, with the purchaser carrying the cost of inventory and providing the raw materials required. As 2014 progresses, we expect a decline in our lead-acid battery production and an increase in the production of our PbC batteries.
In 2011, we continued our automotive work and added new OEM partners. There is an increasing body of empirical evidence being presented with respect to the lack of merit, and/or practicality, of existing stop/start battery solutions, while the potential applicability of our PbC product gains more traction. We and others believe that the fastest, and least expensive, method of reducing CO2 emissions from an internal combustion engine vehicle, and the way to helping meet current and future Corporate Average Fuel Economy (“CAFE”) standards is attained by equipping the vehicle with stop/start technology. The solution offered by our PbC technology combines low cost, with a fast rate of charge acceptance, and achieves the specified stop/start performance that is needed to comply with CO2 emissions regulations, while at the same time improving miles per gallon performance to help meet CAFE standards. We believe our PBC technology is well suited for the emerging micro-hybrid market incorporating stop/start systems; therefore, we have devoted considerable time and money in working with our supply chain partners and prospective customers in this area.
We continue our efforts in hybrid heavy duty truck and hybrid locomotive market. Similar to the hybrid automotive market, battery charge acceptance, fast re-charge ability and high cycle life are critical characteristics required in a product for the heavy duty truck and locomotive hybrid markets. Most of our work in the heavy duty truck market has been in partnership with ePower Engine Systems, Inc. and with Norfolk Southern Corporation in conjunction with their all electric and hybrid locomotive programs.
| 5 |
With the financial assistance provided by the Pennsylvania Energy Development Authority and Commonwealth Financing Authority grants, we commissioned our first PowerCube™ product onsite at our Clover Lane facility in 2011. The PowerCube was fully integrated by us and, in addition to the batteries, contains a racking system, electronics and power equipment, battery management system, climate control and fire suppression systems. As part of this undertaking, we entered into a partnership with Viridity Energy and PJM Interconnection (the largest regional power transmission organization in the US which coordinates the movement of wholesale electricity for more than 61 million people in all or parts of 13 states (http://www.pjm.com/about-pjm/who-we-are.aspx)). The PowerCube was network-connected to the PJM system and allows us to respond through Viridity to curtailment and demand response signals from PJM and participate in frequency regulation. Due to the implementation of the FERC “pay for performance” provisions, there are economic incentives to utilize our PowerCube as fast response to these signals from PJM increases therate the utility will pay on a per kilowatt basis based on set performance metrics.
Since the PowerCube can be scaled, we also commenced development of smaller PowerCube units (mini-cubes). These mini-cube applications include residential storage (at levels down to 10kW) and small commercial storage. The units can be connected to wind and solar power sources in addition to filtering power directly from the grid. The end product will provide backup power, power quality, power smoothing, and potential peak shaving. We are working with installers and integrators and have begun to take this product to market in North America, as was the case with the Washington Naval Yard which was brought online in 2012 and has continued to function with all of the original equipment and batteries since that time.
In November 2013, the Company announced it had received the first in a series of expected orders, for our PowerCube that is being commissioned into a solar project. The PowerCubes will provide storage for energy created by the solar panel system and also service the frequency regulation market. The order includes batteries, racks, wiring, and data communication system encompassing electronics coordination. Shipment and installation began in the fourth quarter of 2013, and the first installation is being completed early in 2014. Axion's PowerCube has proven its effectiveness and reliability by providing daily frequency regulation and demand response services in the PJM grid utility network for the last two years. The solar storage adaptation of the PowerCube was developed with data extracted from the PJM network model, including the important "frequency regulation market" component.
We have consummated two major financing transactions in recent years. On February 3, 2012, we completed a registered direct common stock offering at a price of $0.35 per share. This straight equity transaction provided total gross proceeds of $9.4 million and net cash proceeds of $8.6 million to us after allowing for placement fees and expenses of the offering. On May 8, 2013, the Company consummated the sale of $9 million in aggregate principal amount of senior convertible notes due on February 8, 2015 and warrants to various institutional investors). At closing, the Company received $2.76 million in net proceeds. The $6,000,000 balance of the gross proceeds was deposited into a series of control accounts in the Company’s name, and withdrawals from the control accounts are permitted upon meeting certain conditions. Simultaneously, the Company raised $1 million through the sale of subordinated notes to insiders and one accredited investor. The 2013 financing transactions were exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
Our Business and Products
We have devoted more than ten years to research and development on our PbC technology. Our work has focused on developing our intellectual property, characterizing baseline performance, developing proprietary treatment processes for the activated carbon we use in our electrodes, developing proprietary designs and manufacturing techniques for electrode assemblies and fabricating a series of material and design evaluation prototypes that range from single cell to multi-cell batteries for use in energy storage devices and systems.
Our PbC energy storage device is a hybrid battery supercapacitor that combines the simplicity of lead-acid batteries with the faster recharge rate, longer cycle life and greater charge acceptance of supercapacitors. The result is a relatively low cost device that has versatility of design that will allow differing iterations to deliver maximum power, maximum energy, or a range of balances between the two.
Our PbC technology is protected by thirteen issued U.S. patents and other proprietary features and structures, and we typically have a number of additional patent applications in process at any point in time. The resulting devices are technically sophisticated yet simple in design. The carbon negative electrode assemblies are fabricated from readily available raw materials using, for the most part, standard industrial processes and techniques. The PbC negative electrodes that are then assembled into PbC batteries can be used with the same cases, covers, positive electrodes, separators and electrolyte that are used in conventional lead-acid batteries. Our PbC batteries can be assembled with the same equipment and methodology commonly used for manufacturing conventional lead-acid batteries. PbC batteries use significantly less lead than standard lead-acid batteries with a comparable footprint. Moreover, the lead, plastics and acid employed, just like lead-acid batteries, can be routinely and profitably recycled at existing recycling facilities around the world. As is the case with the lead-acid battery, we expect that in the United States our PbC battery will be fully recycled 99.2% of the time (United States Environmental Protection Agency, Solid Waste and Energy Response [5306P]).
| 6 |
We believe our advanced battery technologies are uniquely situated to answer the current challenges facing the lead-acid battery industry and newer battery chemistries such as lithium-ion, nickel metal hydride, etc. While we further commercialize and continue to explore various potential applications for our PbC technology, the two facilities in New Castle, Pennsylvania provide us with both an excellent R&D facility and a production plant in which to produce our advanced energy storage devices. In manufacturing our PbC battery using conventional lead-acid battery production methods, we provide proof to our potential future PbC negative electrode customers that our product is suitable for immediate use in their lead-acid battery factories.
As we transitioned to commercial manufacturing, in 2010 we entered into a long term lease for an additional New Castle, Pennsylvania facility that we had been subleasing since 2008 (our Green Ridge Road facility). This 45,000 square foot facility currently houses our Gen II robotic PbC negative electrode production line. In addition, during this transition we:
| · | refined our fabrication methods for carbon sheeting, packet assembly and other key components of our carbon electrode assemblies; |
| · | demonstrated the feasibility of manufacturing our PbC device and our other technologies, using standard techniques and equipment; |
| · | demonstrated that the proper quality control can be achieved on our robotic PbC negative electrode manufacturing line; |
| · | demonstrated and documented the performance of our products in key applications; and |
| · | demonstrated that we can respond appropriately to anticipated and unanticipated technical and manufacturing challenges. |
Our Clover Lane facility has a permitted manufacturing capacity of 3,000 batteries per day, so we currently have excess lead-acid battery manufacturing capacity. This allows us to dedicate a portion of this production capacity to direct sale high margin specialty batteries that are required in relatively small numbers, as well as have the flexibility to respond to industry requests to provide contract manufacturing. We are also able to respond quickly if other opportunities to manufacture traditional products present themselves.
Meanwhile, we continue to develop our lead carbon technology for use in a variety of applications in different markets including:
| · | motive power, hybrid and stop/start; |
| · | utility grid connected power and frequency regulation; |
| · | standby power (UPS); | |
| · | renewable energy buffering; and |
| · | military applications. |
We believe demand for cost-effective energy storage systems produced using our PbC technology will grow rapidly. We also believe that our technologies can be among the leaders in the high performance battery market, and that our competitive advantages will include:
| 7 |
We anticipate our ability to establish and maintain a competitive position will be dependent on several factors, including:
| · | the availability of raw materials and key components; |
| · | our ability to manufacture commercial carbon electrode assemblies; |
| · | our ability to operate facilities that can fabricate PbC negative electrode assemblies and commercially manufacture our PbC device with consistent quality at a predictable cost; |
| · | our ability to establish and expand a customer base; |
| · | our ability to execute and perform on any future strategic distribution agreements with tier one and/or tier two battery manufacturers; |
| · | our ability to compete against established, emerging, and other storage technologies; |
| · | the market for batteries in general; and |
| · | our ability to attract and retain key personnel. |
Our objective has consistently been to become an industry leader in the development, production and sourcing of components for low cost, high performance energy storage systems. We plan to achieve this objective by pursuing the following core strategies:
The battery industry is mature, capital intensive, heavily regulated, highly competitive and averse to product performance risks associated with radical departures from established technology. We believe we will be able to make a credible entry into the battery market as we continue to prove the advantages of our PbC device technology in projects with end users in our targeted markets. Therefore, our business plan has had two discrete phases: the development phase (including prototype and demonstration) and the commercialization phase.
| 8 |
In the fourth quarter of 2012, we began early stage commercialization of our PbC technology products. We began implementation of a platform technology business model including fine tuning both the development and manufacturing of our proprietary carbon electrode assemblies that are unique to our PbC batteries. In addition to using these assemblies in our batteries, we eventually intend to sell the assemblies to other established battery manufacturers that are seeking to market more advanced batteries. We believe a platform technology business model will reduce our time to market, allow us to rely on the established business abilities of existing manufacturers and forge a strong brand identity for our PbC products, while, at the same time, allow us to focus on a narrow band of value-added activities that should minimize our investment and maximize our profitability.
Our Patents and Intellectual Property
We own thirteen issued U.S. patents at the date of this report covering various aspects of our PbC technologies, and we typically have a number of patent applications in process at any point in time. There is no assurance that any of the pending patent applications will ultimately be granted. Our issued patents are:
| · | U.S. Patent No. 6,466,429 (expires May 2021) - Electric double layer capacitor |
| · | U.S. Patent No. 6,628,504 (expires May 2021) - Electric double layer capacitor |
| · | U.S. Patent No. 6,706,079 (expires May 2022) - Method of formation and charge of the negative polarizable carbon electrode in an electric double layer capacitor |
| · | U.S. Patent No. 7,006,346 (expires April 2024) - Positive Electrode of an electric double layer capacitor |
| · | U.S. Patent No. 7,110,242 (expires February 2021) - Electrode for electric double layer capacitor and method of fabrication thereof |
| · | U.S. Patent No. 7,119,047 (expires February 2021) - Modified activated carbon for carbon for capacitor electrodes and method of fabrication thereof |
| · | U.S. Patent No. 7,569,514 (expires May 22, 2021) - Method of Fabrication of Modified Activated Carbon |
| · | U.S. Patent No. 7,881,042 (expires March 2027) – Activated Carbon Electrode with PTFE B |
| · | U.S. Patent No. 7,998,616 (expires February 2028) – Negative Electrode for a Hybrid Energy Storage Device |
| · | U.S. Patent No. 8,023,251 (expires November 2028) – Hybrid Energy Storage Device and Method of Making Same |
| · | U.S. Patent No. 8,192,865 (expires October 2027) – Negative Electrode for a Hybrid Energy Storage Device |
| · | U.S. Patent No. 8,202,653 (expires February 2028) – Electrode Grid Structure |
| · | U.S. Patent No. 8,347,468 (expires February 2031) – Method of Making a Current Collector |
Presently, we have no obligation to pay any royalties or license fees with respect to the commercialization of our PbC device technology, and we are not subject to any field of use restrictions. We believe our patents and patent applications, along with our trade secrets, know-how and other intellectual property will be critical to our success.
Our ability to compete effectively with other companies will depend on our ability to maintain and protect the PbC device intellectual property and technology. We plan to file additional patent applications in the future. However, the degree of protection offered by our existing patents or the likelihood that our future applications will be granted, or the degree of protection afforded by future patents, if granted, is uncertain. Competitors in both the United States and foreign countries, many of which have substantially greater resources and have made substantial investment in competing technologies, may have, or may apply for and obtain patents that may prevent, limit or interfere with our ability to make and sell products based on our PbC device technology. Competitors may also intentionally infringe on our patents. The prosecution and defense of patent litigation is both costly and time-consuming, even if the outcome is favorable to us. An adverse outcome in the defense of a patent infringement suit could subject us to significant liabilities to third parties and prevent us from using all or any portion of the technology covered by such a patent. Although third parties have not asserted any infringement claims against us to date, there is no assurance that third parties will not assert such claims in the future.
We also rely on trade secrets and know-how, and there is no assurance that others will not independently develop the same or similar technology or obtain unauthorized access to our trade secrets, know-how and other unpatented technology. To protect our rights in these areas, we require all employees, consultants, advisors and collaborators to enter into strict confidentiality agreements. These agreements may not provide meaningful protection for our unpatented technology in the event of an unauthorized use, misappropriation or disclosure. While we have attempted to protect the unpatented proprietary technology that we develop or acquire, and will continue to attempt to protect future proprietary technology through patents, copyrights and trade secrets, we believe that our success will depend, to a large extent, upon continued innovation and technological expertise.
| 9 |
In general, the level of protection afforded by a patent is directly proportional to the ability of the patent owner to protect and enforce those rights through legal action. Since our financial resources are limited, and patent litigation can be both expensive and time consuming, there can be no assurance that we will be able to successfully prosecute an infringement claim in the event that a competitor develops a technology or introduces a product that infringes on one or more of our patents or patent applications. There can be no assurance that our competitors will not independently develop other technologies that render our proposed products obsolete. In general, we believe the best protection of our proprietary technology will come from market position, technical innovation, speed-to-market, and product performance. There is no assurance that we will realize any benefit from our intellectual property rights.
Our Competition
Our PbC technology is competitive with technologies being developed by a number of new and established companies engaged in the manufacture of energy storage components, devices and systems. In addition, many universities, research institutions and other companies are developing advanced electrochemical energy storage technologies including:
| · | symmetric supercapacitors; |
| · | asymmetric supercapacitors with organic electrolytes; |
| · | nickel metal hydride batteries; |
| · | lithium-ion batteries; |
| · | other advanced lead-acid devices; and |
| · | flow batteries. |
Other business entities are developing advanced energy production technologies like fuel cells, solar cells and windmills which may use our products, or, in some cases, compete with our products. Since some of our competitors are developing technologies that may ultimately have costs similar to, or lower than, our projected costs, there can be no assurance we will be able to compete effectively.
Our competitors with more diversified product offerings may be better positioned to withstand changing market conditions. Some of our competitors own, partner with, or have longer term or stronger relationships with suppliers of raw materials and components, which could result in them being able to obtain raw materials on a more favorable basis than us. It is possible that new competitors or alliances among existing competitors could emerge and rapidly acquire significant market share, which would harm our business.
The development of technology, equipment and manufacturing techniques and the operation of a facility for the automated production of rechargeable batteries require large capital expenditures. In order to minimize our capital investment in manufacturing facilities and establish strong brand name recognition for our products, our overall strategy is to negotiate strategic alliances and other production agreements with established battery manufacturers that want to add high-performance co-branded products to their existing product lines. There can be no assurance that our PbC platform technology business model will succeed in the battery industry.
Raw Materials and Components
During the research stage, we used available raw materials, off-the-shelf components manufactured by others and hand-made components fabricated by our staff. When we begin manufacturing our PbC products in large commercial quantities, we will need to establish reliable supply channels for commercial quantities of raw materials and components. We believe established suppliers of raw materials and components will be able to satisfy our requirements on a timely basis. However, we do not have any long-term supply contracts and the unavailability of necessary raw materials or components could delay the production of our products and impact our results of operations.
Lead is an important raw material in lead-acid batteries and currently accounts for 80% of our raw material and component costs in the specialty conventional lead-acid batteries we now manufacture. Lead prices historically, have fluctuated similar to other industrial commodity metals. Although our PbC battery does not require as much lead as a conventional lead-acid battery, lead is still an important raw material cost component.
| 10 |
Environmental Protection
Lead is a toxic material that is an important raw material in our PbC batteries. We also use, generate and discharge other toxic, volatile and hazardous chemicals and wastes in our research, development and manufacturing activities. We comply with federal, state and local laws and regulations regarding pollution control and environmental protection. Under some statutes and regulations, a government agency, or other parties, may seek to recover response costs from operators of property where releases of hazardous substances have occurred or are ongoing, even if the operator was not responsible for such release or otherwise at fault. In addition, more stringent laws and regulations may be adopted in the future, and the costs of complying with those laws and regulations could be substantial. If we fail to control the use of, or to adequately restrict the discharge of, hazardous substances, we could be subject to significant monetary damages and fines, or forced to suspend certain operations. Our facility was previously tested and found to be in compliance with emission standards as established by new federal guidelines in accordance with the Clean Air Act – Title III.
Our Research and Development
As we embark on our second full year of commercialization, we acknowledge that R&D activities are still an integral part of our business. We engage in extensive R&D activities for the purpose of improving our PbC technology and our proposed products. We remain focused on continuous improvement increase our manufacturing efficiency and reduce our total supply chain costs in order to maximize our competitive advantage. Our R&D organization works closely with our engineering and business development teams, our suppliers and our potential customers as we continue to improve our product design and lower our manufacturing costs as well as our total supply chain costs. Going forward R&D will be primarily focused working with prospective customers to determine how our PbC technology best fits their unique energy storage system requirements. During 2013 and 2012, we spent $2.2 million and $2.6 million, respectively, on R&D.
Our Employees
As of December 31, 2013 we employed a staff of 83, including a 10 member scientific and engineering team, and 50 people who are involved principally in manufacturing. We are not subject to any collective bargaining agreements, and we believe we have a good relationship with our employees.
Description of Properties
On March 10, 2013, we exercised our option for a 5 year renewal on our lease on existing space at our manufacturing plant located at 3601 Clover Lane in New Castle, Pennsylvania. The salient terms of the renewal lease are as follows:
| · | The renewal term commenced on March 10, 2013 with a term of five years. |
| · | The lease may be extended for one additional five-year term with future rent to be negotiated at a commercially reasonable rate. |
| · | The battery manufacturing facility includes 70,438 square feet of floor space, including 7,859 square feet of office, locker, lab and lunch area, 46,931 square feet of manufacturing space, 1,488 square feet of dedicated lab space, 9,200 square feet of storage buildings and 5,000 square feet of basement area. |
| · | The rental amount for the initial term is $16,700 per month, which is fixed through March 2015. In addition to the monthly rental, we are obligated to pay all required maintenance costs, taxes and special assessments, maintain public liability insurance, and maintain fire and casualty insurance for an amount equal to 100% of the replacement value of the leased premises. |
| · | On May 26, 2011 we executed an addendum to the existing lease agreement which resulted in the lease of an additional 2,160 square feet of additional space for $500.00 per month. There were no other changes to the existing lease. |
| · | With the execution of the addendum we now lease 72,598 square feet for a monthly rent of $17,200. |
On November 4, 2010, the Company entered into a Commercial Lease (“Lease”) with Becan Development, LLC (“Lessor”) to lease a 45,000 square foot building, located at 209 Green Ridge Road in New Castle PA, (the “Property”), which the Company currently occupies to house various offices and manufacturing facilities. The salient terms of the Lease are as follows:
| · | The Lease term commenced on January 1, 2011 and the term expires on December 31, 2015. |
| · | The Lease may be extended for two 5-year terms, by giving notice not less than 30 nor more than 120 days before the expiration of the initial term or first renewal term (as applicable). The renewal leases shall be on terms substantially similar to the terms of the initial Lease except for any adjustment to rent, if warranted, as mutually agreed upon by Lessor and the Company. |
| · | The rental amount for the initial term is $19,297 per month and is on a “triple net” basis. |
| · | If the Company is able to obtain sufficient funding from either the federal or state government or agencies, and it enters into a binding agreement to purchase the Property, the Lease shall be immediately terminated and Lessor shall credit the most recent 6 months of actual rental payments made to Lessor against the purchase price of the Property. |
| · | The Company also has a right of first refusal to purchase the property within 30 days of receipt of notice of a third party offer from Lessor upon substantially the same terms as those offered by the third party. |
| · | The Lease contains market terms on standard provisions such as defaults and maintenance. |
| 11 |
Item 1A Risk Factors
Investing in our common stock is very speculative and involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider all of the information in this report before making an investment decision. The following are among the risks we face related to our business, assets and operations. They are not the only risks we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently believe to be immaterial may also arise. Any of these risks could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition, which in turn could materially and adversely affect the trading price of our common stock. You should not purchase our shares unless you can afford to lose your entire investment.
Our business may not be able to continue as a going concern, and we will need to raise additional capital to continue operations through the 4th quarter of 2014.
We believe that our current financial resources will support ongoing operations, working capital, and capital expenditures into the 4th quarter of 2014. However, we will not be able to continue operations through the 4th quarter, without raising additional funding. We believe that there is sufficient risk in achieving revenue levels sufficient to generate liquidity adequate to cover our costs of operations, working capital, and capital expenditures without raising additional capital. We cannot assure you that any additional capital will be available to us on favorable terms, or at all. If we are unable to obtain additional capital when needed, our production, research, development and testing, and other commercial activities will be materially and adversely affected, and we may be unable to take advantage of future opportunities or respond to competitive pressures or to continue our operations through the 4th quarter of 2014. The inability to raise capital in sufficient amounts and on acceptable terms would have a material adverse effect on our ability to continue operations and could result in our inability to continue as a going concern which would mean that we would need to wind down our business.
We are subject to stringent environmental regulation.
We use or generate certain hazardous substances in our research and manufacturing facilities. We do not carry environmental impairment insurance. We believe that all permits and licenses required for our current business activities are in place. Although we do not know of any material environmental, safety or health problems in our property or processes, there can be no assurance that problems will not develop in the future which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operation, or financial condition.
Our products contain hazardous materials including lead.
Lead is a toxic material that is an important raw material in our batteries. We also use, generate and discharge other toxic, volatile and hazardous chemicals and wastes in our research, development and manufacturing activities. We are required to comply with federal, state and local laws and regulations regarding pollution control and environmental protection. Under some statutes and regulations, a government agency, or other parties, may seek to recover response costs from operators of property where releases of hazardous substances have occurred or are ongoing, even if the operator was not responsible for such release or otherwise at fault. In addition, more stringent laws and regulations may be adopted in the future, and the costs of complying with those laws and regulations could be substantial. If we fail to control the use of, or inadequately restrict the discharge of, hazardous substances, we could be subject to significant monetary damages and fines, or be forced to suspend certain operations.
As we sell our products, we may become the subject of product liability claims.
Due to the hazardous nature of many of the key materials used in the manufacturing of our batteries, the producers of such products may be exposed to a greater number of product liability claims, including possible environmental claims. We currently have domestic product liability insurance up to $1,000,000 per occurrence and $5,000,000 in the aggregate to protect us against the risk that in the future a product liability claim or product recall could materially and adversely affect our business operations. Inability to obtain sufficient insurance coverage at an acceptable cost or otherwise to protect against potential product liability claims could prevent or inhibit the commercialization of our product. We cannot assure you that as we continue distribution of our products that we will be able to obtain or maintain adequate coverage on acceptable terms, or that such insurance will provide adequate coverage against all potential claims. Even if we maintain adequate insurance, any successful claim could materially and adversely affect our reputation and prospects, and divert management’s time and attention. If we are sued for any injury allegedly caused by our future products our liability could exceed our total assets and our ability to pay such liability.
| 12 |
We depend on key personnel, and our business may be severely disrupted if we lose the services of our key executives, employees, and consultants.
Our business is dependent upon the knowledge and experience of our key scientists, engineers, manufacturing staff and executive officers. Given the competitive nature of our industry, there is the risk that one or more of our key scientists or engineers will resign their positions, which could have a disruptive impact on our operations. If any of our key scientists, engineers or executive officers do not continue in their present positions, we may not be able to easily replace them and our business may be severely disrupted. If any of these individuals joins a competitor or forms a competing company, we could lose important know-how and experience and incur substantial expense to recruit and train suitable replacements. Our Compensation Committee remains committed to keeping our key team members in place as we move forward into greater commercialization of our PbC product. Currently, all of our key employees have employment contracts that include non-compete provisions.
Our operations expose us to litigation, tax, environmental and other legal compliance risks.
We are subject to a variety of litigation, tax, environmental, health and safety and other legal compliance risks. These risks include, among other things, possible liability relating to product liability matters, personal injuries, intellectual property rights, contract-related claims, government contracts, taxes, health and safety liabilities, environmental matters and compliance with U.S. and foreign laws, competition laws and laws governing improper business practices. We or one of our business units could be charged with wrongdoing as a result of such matters. If convicted or found liable, we could be subject to significant fines, penalties, repayments or other damages (in certain cases, treble damages). As a business with international reach, we are subject to complex laws and regulations in the U.S. and other countries in which we operate. Those laws and regulations may be interpreted in different ways. They may also change from time to time, as may related interpretations and other guidance. Changes in laws or regulations could result in higher expenses and payments, and uncertainty relating to laws or regulations may also affect how we conduct our operations and structure our investments and could limit our ability to enforce our rights.
In the area of taxes, changes in tax laws and regulations, as well as changes in related interpretations and other tax guidance could materially impact our tax receivables and liabilities and our deferred tax assets and tax liabilities. Additionally, in the ordinary course of business, we are subject to examinations by various authorities, including tax authorities. In addition to ongoing investigations, there could be additional investigations launched in the future by governmental authorities in various jurisdictions and existing investigations could be expanded. The global and diverse nature of our operations means that these risks will continue to exist and additional legal proceedings and contingencies will arise from time to time. Our results may be affected by the outcome of legal proceedings and other contingencies that cannot be predicted with certainty.
In the sourcing of our products throughout the world, we process, store, dispose of and otherwise use large amounts of hazardous materials, especially lead and acid. As a result, we are subject to extensive and changing environmental, health and safety laws and regulations governing, among other things: the generation, handling, storage, use, transportation and disposal of hazardous materials; remediation of polluted ground or water; emissions or discharges of hazardous materials into the ground, air or water; and the health and safety of our employees. Compliance with these laws and regulations results in ongoing costs. Failure to comply with these laws or regulations, or to obtain or comply with required environmental permits, could result in fines, criminal charges or other sanctions by regulators. From time to time we have had instances of alleged or actual noncompliance that have resulted in the imposition of fines, penalties and required corrective actions. Our ongoing compliance with environmental, health and safety laws, regulations and permits could require us to incur significant expenses, limit our ability to modify or expand our facilities or continue production and require us to install additional pollution control equipment and make other capital improvements. In addition, private parties, including current or former employees, could bring personal injury or other claims against us due to the presence of, or exposure to, hazardous substances used, stored or disposed of by us or contained in our products.
Certain environmental laws assess liability on owners or operators of real property for the cost of investigation, removal or remediation of hazardous substances at their current or former properties or at properties at which they have disposed of hazardous substances. These laws may also assess costs to repair damage to natural resources. We may be responsible for remediating damage to our properties caused by former owners. Soil and groundwater contamination has occurred at some of our current and former properties and may occur or be discovered at other properties in the future. We are currently investigating and monitoring soil and groundwater contamination at several of our properties, in most cases as required by regulatory permitting processes. We may be required to conduct these operations at other properties in the future. In addition, we have been and in the future may be liable to contribute to the cleanup of locations owned or operated by other persons to which we or our predecessor companies have sent wastes for disposal, pursuant to federal and other environmental laws. Under these laws, the owner or operator of contaminated properties and companies that generated, disposed of or arranged for the disposal of wastes sent to a contaminated disposal facility can be held jointly and severally liable for the investigation and cleanup of such properties, regardless of fault.
| 13 |
Changes in environmental and climate laws or regulations, including laws relating to greenhouse gas emissions, could lead to new or additional investment in production designs and could increase environmental compliance expenditures. Changes in climate change concerns, or in the regulation of such concerns, including greenhouse gas emissions, could subject us to additional costs and restrictions, including increased energy and raw materials costs. Additionally, we cannot assure you that we have been or at all times will be in compliance with environmental laws and regulations or that we will not be required to expend significant funds to comply with, or discharge liabilities arising under, environmental laws, regulations and permits, or that we will not be exposed to material environmental, health or safety litigation.
Risks related to our PbC Technology
We have limited manufacturing experience with respect to our PbC technology, which may translate into cost overruns in manufacturing our products.
We have limited manufacturing experience with respect to production of our commercial PbC negative electrodes in quantities required to achieve our operational goals, and there is no assurance that we will be able to retain a qualified manufacturing staff or effectively manage the manufacturing of our proposed products when we are ready to do so.
We began the commercial production of our energy storage devices in the fourth quarter of 2012. As production levels increase, we may experience cost overruns in manufacturing our PbC products, and we may not have sufficient capital in the future to successfully complete such tasks. In addition, we may not be able to manufacture our products because of industry conditions, general economic conditions, and/or competition from potential manufacturers and distributors. These inabilities could cause us to abandon our current business plan and may cause our operations to eventually fail.
We need to continue to improve the performance of our commercial PbC products to meet future requirements and competitive pressures
We need to continue to improve various aspects of our PbC technology as we move forward with larger scale production and new applications of our products. Future developments and competition may reveal additional technical issues that are not currently recognized as obstacles. If we cannot continue to improve the performance of our products in a timely manner, we may be forced to redesign or delay large scale production or possibly abandon our product development efforts altogether.
We do not have any long-term supplier contracts.
We currently purchase the raw materials for our carbon electrodes and a variety of other components from third parties. We then fabricate our carbon electrodes and build our products in-house. We do not have any long-term contracts with suppliers of raw materials and components, and our current suppliers may be unable to satisfy our future requirements on a timely basis. Moreover, the price of purchased raw materials and components could fluctuate significantly due to circumstances beyond our control. If our current suppliers are unable to satisfy our long-term requirements on a timely basis, we may be required to seek alternative sources for necessary materials and components or redesign our proposed products to accommodate available substitutes.
We are a small player in an intensely competitive international market and may be unable to compete.
The lead-acid battery industry is large, intensely competitive and resistant to technological change. We may need to compete or enter into further strategic relationships with well-established companies that are much larger and have greater financial capital and other resources than we do. We may be unable to convince end users that products based on our PbC technology are superior to available alternatives. Moreover, if competitors introduce similar products, they may have a greater ability to withstand price competition and finance their marketing programs. There is no assurance that we will be able to compete effectively.
Our failure to introduce new products and product enhancements and broad market acceptance of new technologies introduced by our competitors could adversely affect our business.
Many new energy storage technologies have been introduced over the past several years. For certain important and growing international energy storage markets, lithium-based battery technologies have a large and growing market share. Our ability to achieve significant and sustained penetration of key developing markets, including aerospace and defense, will depend upon our success in developing or acquiring these and other technologies, either independently, through joint ventures or through acquisitions. If we fail to develop or acquire, and manufacture and sell, products that satisfy our customers’ demands, or we fail to respond effectively to new product announcements by our competitors by quickly introducing competitive products, then market acceptance of our products could be reduced and our business could be adversely affected. We cannot assure you that our products will remain competitive with products based on new technologies.
| 14 |
To the extent we enter into strategic relationships, we will be dependent upon our partners.
Some of our products are not intended for direct sale to end users and our business may require us to enter into strategic relationships with manufacturers of other power industry equipment that use batteries and other energy storage devices as important components of their finished products. The agreements governing any future strategic relationships may not provide us with control over the activities of any strategic relationship we negotiate and our future partners, if any, could retain the right to terminate the strategic relationship at their option. Our future partners will have significant discretion in determining the efforts and level of resources that they dedicate to our products and may be unwilling or unable to fulfill their obligations to us. In addition, our future partners may develop and commercialize, either alone or with others, products that are similar to or competitive with the products that we intend to produce.
Risks relating to our intellectual property
We may rely on licenses for our PbC technology, which may affect our continued operations with respect thereto.
As we develop our PbC technology, we may need to license additional technologies to optimize the performance of our products. We may not be able to license these technologies on commercially reasonable terms or at all. In addition, we may fail to successfully integrate any licensed technology into our proposed products. Our inability to obtain any necessary licenses could delay our product development and testing until alternative technologies can be identified, licensed and integrated. The inability to obtain any necessary third-party licenses could cause us to abandon a particular development path, which could seriously harm our business, financial position and results of our operations.
New technology may lead to our competitors developing superior products which would reduce demand for our products.
Research into the electrochemical applications for carbon nanotechnology and other storage technologies is proceeding at a rapid pace, and many private and public companies and research institutions are actively engaged in the development of new battery technologies based on carbon nanotubes, nanostructured carbon materials and other non-carbon materials. These new technologies may, if successfully developed, offer significant performance or price advantages when compared with our technologies. There is no assurance that our existing patents or our pending and proposed patent applications will offer meaningful protection if a competitor develops a novel product based on a new technology.
If we are unable to protect our proprietary technology and preserve our trade secrets, we will increase our vulnerability to competitors which could materially adversely impact our ability to remain in business.
Our ability to successfully commercialize our products will depend on our ability to protect those products and our technology with domestic and foreign patents. We will also need to continue to preserve our trade secrets. The issuance of a patent is not conclusive as to its validity or as to the enforceable scope of the claims of the patent. The patent positions of technology companies, including us, are uncertain and involve complex legal and factual issues.
We cannot assure you that our patents will prevent other companies from developing similar products or products which produce benefits substantially the same as our products, or that other companies will not be issued patents that may prevent the sale of our products or require us to pay significant licensing fees in order to market our products.
From time to time, we may need to obtain licenses to patents and other proprietary rights held by third parties in order to develop, manufacture and market our products. If we are unable to timely obtain these licenses on commercially reasonable terms, our ability to commercially exploit such products may be inhibited or prevented. Additionally, we cannot assure investors that any of our products or technology will be patentable or that any future patents we obtain will give us an exclusive position in the subject matter claimed by those patents. Furthermore, we cannot assure investors that our pending patent applications will result in issued patents, that patent protection will be secured for any particular technology, or that our issued patents will be valid or enforceable or provide us with meaningful protection.
If we are required to engage in expensive and lengthy litigation to enforce our intellectual property rights, the costs of such litigation could be material to our results of operations, financial condition and liquidity and, if we are unsuccessful, the results of such litigation could materially adversely impact our entire business.
We may find it necessary to initiate litigation to enforce our patent rights, to protect our trade secrets or know-how or to determine the scope and validity of the proprietary rights of others. We plan to aggressively defend our proprietary technology and any issued patents if funding is available to do so. Litigation concerning patents, trademarks, copyrights and proprietary technologies can often be time-consuming and expensive and, as with litigation generally, the outcome is inherently uncertain.
| 15 |
Although we have entered into invention assignment agreements with our employees and with certain advisors, if those employees or advisors develop inventions or processes independently which may relate to products or technology under development by us, disputes may also arise about the ownership of those inventions or processes. Time-consuming and costly litigation could be necessary to enforce and determine the scope of our rights under these agreements.
We also rely on confidentiality agreements with our strategic partners, customers, suppliers, employees and consultants to protect our trade secrets and proprietary know-how. We may be required to commence litigation to enforce such agreements, and it is certainly possible that we will not have adequate remedies for breaches of our confidentiality agreements.
Other companies may claim that our technology infringes on their intellectual property or proprietary rights and commence legal proceedings against us which could be time-consuming and expensive and could result in our being prohibited from developing, marketing, selling or distributing our products.
Because of the complex and difficult legal and factual questions that relate to patent positions in our industry, we cannot assure you that our products or technology will not be found to infringe upon the intellectual property or proprietary rights of others. Third parties may claim that our products or technology infringe on their patents, copyrights, trademarks or other proprietary rights and demand that we cease development or marketing of those products or technology or pay license fees. We may not be able to avoid costly patent infringement litigation, which will divert the attention of management away from the development of new products and the operation of our business. We cannot assure investors that we would prevail in any such litigation. If we are found to have infringed on a third party’s intellectual property rights, we may be liable for money damages, encounter significant delays in bringing products to market or be precluded from manufacturing particular products or using particular technology.
Other parties may challenge certain of our foreign patent applications. If such parties are successful in opposing our foreign patent applications, we may not gain the protection afforded by those patent applications in particular jurisdictions and may face additional proceedings with respect to similar patents in other jurisdictions, as well as related patents. The loss of patent protection in one jurisdiction may influence our ability to maintain patent protection for the same technology in other jurisdictions.
Risks relating to our recent financing
Our recently acquired indebtedness reduces our financial flexibility and could impede our ability to operate.
We consummated a private placement on May 8, 2013 in which we issued an aggregate $9 million principal amount of Senior Convertible Notes and $1 million principal amount of Junior Convertible Notes. The Senior Convertible Notes are payable in nine equal monthly installments with the first prepayment made in June, 2013. The Junior Convertible Notes are payable 91 days after the principal amount of the Senior Convertible Notes is repaid. Although the notes are payable through the issuance of shares of our common stock to the noteholders, our ability to issue stock, instead of paying cash, to satisfy our payment obligations under the notes, is limited and subject to various conditions (including trading volume and stock price conditions for our Senior Convertible Notes) that we may not be able to meet. If we cannot meet these conditions, we could be required to repay some or all of the amounts due under the notes in cash, and we may not have the funds available to make one or more of such payments when due. Even if we do have funds so available, the use of cash to make such payments could adversely affect our ability to fund operations due to the diversion of necessary cash flow to fund operations to utilization for note payments. Furthermore, the notes impose certain restrictive covenants on us which may impede our ability to operate our business or raise further funds in the capital markets. For example, there are restrictions on incurring additional indebtedness, with exceptions, while the notes are outstanding.
We are making, and intend to continue making, payments on our Senior Convertible Notes and Subordinated Convertible Notes in shares of our common stock, which could be highly dilutive to our shareholders.
As of the date of this document, we do not believe that we will have the financial ability, nor would it be in the best interests of our shareholders, to make all payments on the notes in cash when due. Thus, we intend, as of the date hereof, to make such payments in shares of our common stock, to the greatest extent possible. Such payments shall be very dilutive to our shareholders.
Risks relating to our common stock
We have issued a large number of warrants and options, which if exercised, would substantially increase the number of common shares outstanding.
On February 28, 2014, we had 205,261,452 shares of common stock outstanding, and (a) we have warrants outstanding that, if fully exercised, would generate proceeds of $6,366,162 and cause us to issue up to an additional 20,826,436 shares of common stock, with 17,281,107 of these warrants classified as derivative liabilities, and (b) we have options outstanding to purchase common stock that, if fully exercised, would generate proceeds of $5,734,116 and result in the issuance of an additional 3,431,729 shares of common stock.
| 16 |
Our stock price may not stabilize at current levels.
Our common stock is quoted on the OTC Market, Inc.’s OTCQB. Trading in our common stock has demonstrated wide ranges of volume, and the market price has been volatile. The closing price reported as of March 6, 2014, the latest practicable date, was $0.15 per share. Current quotations are not necessarily a reliable indicator of value and there is no assurance that the market price of our stock will stabilize at or near current levels.
Item 2 Properties
We do not own any real property and lease our two New Castle, PA facilities. The terms of the leases are set forth above in Item 1. Business (Description of Properties).
Item 3 Legal Proceedings
From time to time, we are involved in lawsuits, claims, investigations and proceedings, including pending opposition proceedings involving patents that arise in the ordinary course of business. There are no matters pending that we expect to have a material adverse impact on our business, results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.
Item 4 Mine Safety Disclosures
Not Applicable.
PART II
Item 5 Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Market information
Our common stock trades on the OTCQB under the symbol “AXPW”. Trading in our common stock has historically lacked consistent volume, and the market price has been volatile.
The following table shows the range of high and low bid prices for our common stock as reported by the OTCQB. The quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail markup, markdown or commission and may not represent actual transactions.
| Period | High | Low | ||||||
| First Quarter 2012 | $ | 0.64 | $ | 0.28 | ||||
| Second Quarter 2012 | $ | 0.47 | $ | 0.30 | ||||
| Third Quarter 2012 | $ | 0.36 | $ | 0.25 | ||||
| Fourth Quarter 2012 | $ | 0.34 | $ | 0.20 | ||||
| First Quarter 2013 | $ | 0.38 | $ | 0.27 | ||||
| Second Quarter 2013 | $ | 0.29 | $ | 0.14 | ||||
| Third Quarter 2013 | $ | 0.20 | $ | 0.12 | ||||
| Fourth Quarter 2013 | $ | 0.14 | $ | 0.10 | ||||
On March 6, 2014, the sale price for our common stock as reported on the OTCQB was $0.15 per share.
Securities outstanding and holders of record
On December 31, 2013 there were 392 shareholders of record for our common stock and 180,401,405 shares of our common stock outstanding.
Dividends
We have never paid dividends.
| 17 |
Information respecting equity compensation plans
Summary Equity Compensation Plan Information: The following table provides summary information on our equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2013:
| Equity Compensation Plan Category | Number of shares Issuable on exercise of Outstanding options | Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options | Number of shares available for future issuance under equity compensation plans | |||||||||
| Compensation plans approved by stockholders | ||||||||||||
| 2004 Directors’ Option Plan | 1,222,847 | $ | 0.69 | 1,777,153 | ||||||||
| Compensation not approved by stockholders | ||||||||||||
| 2010 Employees and Officers Stock Option Plan | 3,969,293 | $ | 1.71 | 2,030,707 | ||||||||
| Total equity awards | 5,192,140 | $ | 1.22 | |||||||||
The 2004 Directors’ Option Plan is an equity compensation plan and the 2010 Employees and Officers Stock Option Plan are unqualified plans. On December 18, 2013, the board of directors amended both plans and ratified the changes on March 19, 2014, to increase the authorized shares for each plan to 3,000,000 shares and 6,000,000 shares, respectively. For certain positions, the Company enters into employment and other contracts that provide for equity compensation arrangements other than those contemplated by the stockholder approved plans.
Item 7 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) is written to help the reader understand our Company. The MD&A is provided as a supplement to, and should be read in conjunction with, our unaudited consolidated financial statements, the accompanying consolidated financial statement notes appearing elsewhere in this report and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.
| 18 |
Key Performance Indicators, Material Trends and Uncertainties
We utilize appropriate non-financial measures to evaluate the performance of our R&D and engineering activities and projects with prospective customers. Our demonstration projects entail extended periods of time to assess our energy devices over multiple charge and discharge cycles. Further, the results of our demonstration projects do not lend themselves to simple measurement and presentation.
The three most significant financial metrics for our business during the first two years of our initial commercialization phase have been:
| · | Revenue growth of our PbC technologies. |
| · | Extracting an acceptable and competitive level of operating profit from our revenue (as measured by EBITDA). |
| · | Ensuring we have sufficient capital to fund our short and long-term business requirements. |
We will continue to characterize and perfect our products through working with certain prospective customers in a number of projects as we move into full commercial production. While the results of this work are moving toward that goal, we cannot provide assurances that the products will be successful in their present design or that further R&D will not be needed. The successful completion of present and future characterization and demonstration projects is critical to the development and acceptance of our PbC technology.
We must continue to improve methodologies for manufacturing carbon electrode assemblies for our energy storage devices in commercial quantities. While we have assembled an engineering team that we believe can accomplish this goal, and are adding to it as we go forward, there is no assurance that we will be able to successfully commercialize our PbC products in large quantities.
Financing Activities
On February 3, 2012, the Company completed a registered direct common stock offering providing gross proceeds of approximately $9.4 million and net proceeds were approximately $8.6 million after the expenses of the offering and placement fees. In May 2013, we entered into a $9.0 million private placement of senior and $1.0 million subordinated convertible notes for which we received approximately $2.76 million in net proceeds at closing from the senior convertible note, after deducting our placement agent’s fee of $240,000. Our other offering expenses, other than our placement agent’s fee, are approximately $100,000 in related expenses were paid out of the proceeds at closing. Also at closing, $6.0 million was placed into a restricted account; amounts are being released from the account for the Company’s use in 12 equal monthly installments. At each Funds Release, we receive approximately $460,000 in net proceeds, after deducting our placement agent’s fee of $40,000. With respect to the subordinated convertible notes, we received the entire $1.0 million principal amount at closing.
Award Activities: Grants and Contracts
The $298,605 solar energy program grant from the Pennsylvania Department of Community and Economic Development was completed during 2011. Final payment of $41,171 was received in May 2012.
In May 2012, the Company was awarded a $150,000 Phase I grant from the U.S. Department of Energy to fund a commercialization plan for the use of its PbC batteries in a “low-cost, high-efficiency” dual battery architecture for micro-hybrid vehicles. We completed a substantial amount of work on this program in 2012 and successfully completed review of that work and of our overall program. We completed billing on this grant and received all monies in January of 2013.
There was no other grant activity in 2013.
| 19 |
Results of Operations
Our strategy has been to utilize traditional production to train our work force, test our systems and incorporate quality improvements that we believe will ultimately benefit future PbC production. We continued that strategy in 2013. Throughout 2013, we have made continuous improvements in the operating software and equipment for our automated robotic electrode production line. These changes have improved the throughput and consistency of the processes and the line currently provides us more than enough capacity for our short to mid-term needs.
We completed our “continuous roll carbon sheeting” line in the first quarter of 2013 and began producing carbon sheeting for our PbC batteries. Production of carbon sheeting is the last step in automating our negative carbon electrode manufacturing and demonstrates an incrementally significant event in terms of commercial production. Completion of this line brings us quality control, meaningful production quantities (this line currently outpaces the full electrode production line while utilizing one shift) and significant labor cost reduction. A crew of two running this line can produce more carbon sheet product than could our previous crew of ten operating a manual process. In addition, utilizing this line has resulted in no loss of carbon sheet “energy capacity”. In fact it has resulted in a modest gain due in part to the more uniform disbursement of activated carbon in the sheet. Initial quantities of waste created by the process have also been reduced. The obvious result of commissioning this line is an improved product at a reduced unit cost.
Work continues with the vehicle manufacturers of micro-hybrid vehicles that we have been working with for the past several years. Serious discussions, and the exchange of test results, continue with vehicle manufacturers regarding partnering with them on advanced stage testing of a two battery system. As we have previously reported, the interest of several OEMs has been fueled by our White Paper that highlights the importance of “charge acceptance” in battery products designed for the micro hybrid and stop/start markets.
Our onsite PowerCube project continues to respond to signals from the grid in conjunction with our partnership arrangement with Viridity and PJM. There is a high interest level in our PowerCube technology for several applications. In addition to demonstrating dispatchable power, we will be proving out the PowerCube’s ability to provide power quality, back- up power, power smoothing, frequency regulation, and load leveling. Our .5MW PowerCube is a building block size unit that can easily be scaled up or down.
We continue to evaluate the market for smaller PowerCubes for residential and community storage and larger PowerCubes for utilities, oil rigs and other larger applications such as solar and wind.
Other highlights for 2013 included:
| · | In November 2013, we announced that the Company had received a purchase order, along with a substantial down payment, for a PowerCube to be commissioned into a solar project. The Cube will provide storage for energy created by the solar panel system and also service the frequency regulation market. The order includes batteries, racks, wiring, data communication system and electronics coordination (electronics and power system to be provided by Owner). The project has been in development for some time and the Company shipped the equipment to the site in the fourth quarter of 2013. The solar panel installation is behind schedule due to this year’s weather patterns in the northeast, but the installation is expected to be completed in the second quarter of 2014. | |
| · | Subsequently, in the first quarter of 2014, as part of our growing relationship with the New Jersey integrator of our PowerCube, we visited the solar project site to inspect the progress made to date. Although the solar portion of the project has been slowed by weather conditions, the racking system and the PbC batteries have been installed in their permanent location and all related wiring has been completed. When the solar panel work and the bi-directional inverter hook up is completed, probably by mid-second quarter 2014, we will qualify the Reg. D signal (a couple of days). Once qualified, the PowerCube will begin participating full time in the PJM network at a full 500kw up and 500kw down. Having the New Jersey PowerCube project online is a further 'proof in market' validation for our technology and for our model and is one more important data point for the potential multi MW customer groups with whom we are currently in various stages of negotiation. Based on our model, and past PJM records, this .5MW installation will provide the Owner more than $9,000 per month (net after expenses). This attractive ROI and IRR are major points of focus in our go forward marketing plan for our PowerCubes. And this revenue is in addition to the storage and emergency back up the PowerCube will provide. |
| · | In September 2013, we announced that we believe the PowerCube energy storage system would qualify as a potential provider in the new California proposed state mandate calling for the creation of 1.3 gigawatts of energy storage to support the state's power grid by 2020 (and beginning in 2014). Axion has initiated discussions and will be entertaining proposals from potential strategic partners as we explore the best business and technology combination packages for pursuing the California energy storage initiative. Our initiative gained further traction with the September 3, 2013 announcement by the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) calling for the establishment of a new regulatory regime that enables utilities, third-party storage providers like Axion and others to integrate their assets and technologies to create and operate an energy storage system connected to the state's power grid. The CPUC's proposal is a response to a 2010 California law that mandated the creation of an energy storage system that integrates solar and wind energy into the state power grid while managing peak power needs. |
| · | In July 2013, we announced the receipt of an order from privately held ePower Engine Systems LLC, headquartered in Florence KY. The order is for PbC batteries and management systems required to convert ten (10) Class 8 trucks from standard internal combustion engines (ICE) to 'series diesel electric hybrid drive train systems' utilizing ePower's proprietary technology (the 'System'). This purchase order is a follow on order between Axion and ePower and further validates the performance of the PbC batteries in this hybrid application. At ePower's current specifications, each conversion kit System would require 56 PbC batteries and the PbC battery management system (BMS). Axion values each potential truck conversion battery order at in excess of $20,000. The batteries and BMS will not only be utilized in ePower’s in house truck conversions but they will also make up part of the conversion kits, which ePower will market to fleets, trucking firms and OEMs that are in the business of retrofitting Class 8 trucks and beyond. Axion will also be free to market PbC batteries and technologies to others in the trucking market. | |
| · | In an event subsequent to year end, in February of 2014 we appointed Dr. James Smith to a position of consultant to the company and liaison to ePower. Dr. Smith previously owned, and was directly involved in, a Class 8 trucking business for more than 20 years. This appointment further demonstrates our commitment to the ePower series hybrid initiative and underscores our recognition of the tremendous revenue opportunity this market offers to our PbC battery product. ePower has continued their progress in improving fuel economy, on a miles per gallon basis, over and above their promising early test results. Their system will also significantly reduce emissions of all types, which meshes well with the US government's newly announced emphasis in this area. Dr. Smith, in his new position, will be spending time at Axion and at ePower. |
| 20 |
| · | In January 2013 we announced that our Residential Energy Storage Hub ("HUB"), had achieved certification to UL1741, IEEE 1547 and Canadian Standards Association (CSA) safety standards. The certification effectively allows the HUB to be marketed and installed throughout North America. The UL 1741 Standard covers converters, inverters, controllers and interconnection system equipment for use with distributed energy resources. The Residential Energy Storage Hub offers secure home power for the residential market segment including uninterruptible power capabilities, as well as an ability to store energy from renewable sources or from the electric grid. The HUB also protects a residence's electrical circuitry, prioritizes its circuits and has the ability to be grid-connected so that, either on a regular or occasional basis, the homeowner – through a group - can participate with a local utility in demand-response and/or power curtailment. |
| · | In January 2013, we announced the completion and shipment of our high-performance PbC batteries to Norfolk Southern Corp. (NS), one of North America's leading transportation providers, for use in Norfolk Southern's first all-electric locomotive - the NS-999. Axion Power shipped the last skids that comprised this battery order to NS in late December for use in powering the NS-999 "yard switcher" locomotive. The switcher functions in the train yard where its responsibilities include moving rail cars and assisting in disassembling and assembling various train configurations. In parallel, Axion and Norfolk Southern continue to participate in the development of an energy system for "over the road" hybrid locomotives that will be much more powerful units that would require significantly more batteries. |
Overview
Axion Power International, Inc. (the “Company”, Axion, “we”, “our”, or “us”) is a company whose primary purpose is to develop, design, manufacture, source related components and sell advanced energy storage devices and components that are based on our patented PbC Technology. Net sales are derived from the sale of lead-acid batteries for specialty collector and racing cars; sales of AGM batteries and flooded lead-acid batteries; sales of PbC batteries and PbC energy storage components, devices and systems. Advanced batteries using our PbC technology are manufactured primarily through the use of activated carbon as an alternative to lead in the battery’s negative electrode and have application in virtually all energy system storage functions. It is the Company’s long term goal to become a primary supply source of PbC negative electrodes to established battery manufacturers.
| · | Our primary activity is the development, design, manufacture, sourcing and marketing of advanced energy storage devices, components and systems that are primarily based on our patented PBC technology. |
| · | Net sales are derived from the sale of lead - acid batteries for specialty collector and racing cars; sales of AGM batteries and flooded lead- acid batteries: sales of PbC batteries and PbC energy storage components and devices and from the sales of products and services related to advanced battery applications for our PbC technology. |
| · | Cost of tangible goods sold include raw materials, components, labor, and allocated manufacturing overhead to produce batteries and provide components for PbC energy storage devices sold to customers. Cost of tangible goods sold represented in our current financial statements may not be indicative of the future costs to produce batteries and provide components for PbC energy storage devices. Also included in tangible cost of goods sold are provisions for inventory valuation and obsolescence reserves. |
| · | Cost of goods sold – idle capacity include direct production costs in excess of charges allocated to our finished goods in production. Operating costs include labor, production supplies, repairs and maintenance. Our charges for labor and overhead allocated to our finished goods are determined on a basis which is calculated presuming normal capacity utilization of two shifts a day, five days per week, which is lower than our actual production costs incurred. Operating costs in excess of production allocations are expensed in the period incurred rather than to the cost of finished goods produced. Idle capacity expenses for the year ended December 31, 2013 was $1,758,407. The Company has reclassified amounts identified as “idle capacity” for the year ended December 31, 2012 of $1,534,138 and has reclassified that expense as part of cost of sales. |
| · | Research and development expenses (‘R&D”) include expenses to design, develop and test advanced batteries, carbon electrode assemblies and systems for our energy storage products with prospective customers based on our patented lead carbon technology. Also included in R&D are materials consumed in the production of pilot plant production and our engineering activities | |
| · | Selling, general and administrative expenses include business development, sales and marketing expenses; administrative expenses; and, expenses associated with being a public company. |
Results of Operations
Summarized selected statement of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012.
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||
| 2013 | 2012 | |||||||
| Net Sales | $ | 10,187,362 | $ | 9,779,711 | ||||
| Cost of tangible goods sold | 10,219,654 | 9,840,755 | ||||||
| Cost of goods sold – idle capacity | 1,758,407 | 1,534,138 | ||||||
| Gross Profit | (1,790,699 | ) | (1,595,182 | ) | ||||
| Research and development | 2,171,954 | 2,552,581 | ||||||
| Selling, general and administrative | 4,591,054 | 4,404,040 | ||||||
| Other (income) expense | (322,683 | ) | (1,490 | ) | ||||
| Operating loss | (8,231,024 | ) | (8,550,313 | ) | ||||
| Change in value of senior warrants, gain | (2,419,568 | ) | - | |||||
| Change in value conversion feature senior notes, gain | (1,511,968 | ) | - | |||||
| Debt discount amortization expense | 3,771,948 | - | ||||||
| Interest expense, note payable | 19,405 | 17,594 | ||||||
| Extinguishment los on senior notes conversion | 1,957,689 | - | ||||||
| Derivative revaluations (gain) loss | (1,217 | ) | (14,626 | ) | ||||
| Interest on convertible notes | 1,915,725 | - | ||||||
| Net income (loss) | $ | (11,963,038 | ) | $ | (8,553,281 | ) | ||
Reconciliation of net loss to EBITDA
| 2013 | 2012 | |||||||
| GAAP net (loss) | $ | (11,963,038 | ) | $ | (8,553,281 | ) | ||
| Plus: Interest expense | 19,405 | 17,594 | ||||||
| Depreciation expense | 1,505,944 | 1,320,594 | ||||||
| Stock based compensation | 201,757 | 445,966 | ||||||
| Derivative revaluations (income) | (1,217 | ) | (14,626 | ) | ||||
| Change in value senior warrants, gain | (2,419,568 | ) | - | |||||
| Change in value, conversion feature senior notes, gain | (1,511,968 | ) | - | |||||
| Debt discount amortization expense | 3,771,948 | - | ||||||
| Extinguishment loss on senior notes conversion | 1,957,689 | - | ||||||
| Interest on convertible debt | 1,915,725 | - | ||||||
| EBITDA (1) | $ | (6,523,323 | ) | $ | (6,783,753 | ) | ||
| (1) |
EBITDA, a non-GAAP financial measure, is defined as earnings before interest expense and interest income, taxes, depreciation, amortization, share based compensation, derivative revaluations, and impairment of assets. EBITDA is used by management to internally measure our operating and management performance and by investors as a supplemental financial measure to evaluate the performance of our business that, when viewed with our GAAP results and the accompanying reconciliation, we believe provides additional information that is useful to gain an understanding of the factors and trends affecting our business.
|
| 21 |
Summary of Consolidated Operating Results for the Year Ended December 31, 2013 Compared with the Year Ended December 31, 2012
Net Sales
Net sales for the year ended December 31, 2013 were $10.2 million compared to $9.8 million for the same period in 2012. We had one customer that accounted for 84.5% of sales in 2013 and one customer that accounted for 80.7% of sales in 2012. The increase in net sales in 2013 compared to 2012 is due to a general increase in customer demand for our products.
Cost of Tangible Goods Sold
Cost of tangible goods sold for the year ended December 31, 2013 were $10.2 million compared to $9.8 million for the same period in 2012. The increase in tangible goods sold resulted primarily from an increase in the related product sales.
Cost of Goods Sold – Idle Capacity
Cost of goods sold – idle capacity for the year ended December 31, 2013 was $1.8 million compared to $1.5 million for the same period in 2012. The increase in cost of goods sold – idle capacity, resulted primarily from an increase in non-direct manufacturing costs.
Gross Profit
Gross loss for the year ended December 31, 2013 was $(1.8) million. Gross loss for the year ended December 31, 2012 was $(1.6) million.
Research and Development
Research and development expenses for the year ended December 31, 2013 were $2.2 million compared to $2.6 million for the same period in 2012, due mainly to a reduction in contract research & development costs.
Selling, General and Administrative
Selling, general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2013 were $4.6 million compared to $4.4 million for the same period in 2012. The change was due mainly to increases in general administrative costs, legal and directors fees.
Other Income
Other income for the year ended December 31, 2013 was $0.3 million compared to $0.0 million for the same period in 2012. The increase was due primarily from the sale of tax credits and a sales tax refund.
Operating Loss
The resulting operating loss for the year ended December 31, 2013 was $(8.2) million compared to $(8.6) million for the same period in 2012.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our primary source of liquidity has historically been cash generated from issuances of our equity securities. From inception through December 31, 2013, we have not generated revenue from operations that was significant enough to produce an operating profit.
| 22 |
We believe that the currently available funds at December 31, 2013, which includes the net remaining amount available in the restricted cash account and funds generated from products sales will provide sufficient financial resources for our operations, working capital and will fund our anticipated continued growth of sales in traditional batteries and PbC products and maintain our anticipated capital expenditures into the fourth quarter of 2014.
Subsequent sources of outside funding will be required to fund the Company’s working capital, capital expenditures and corporate operations through the fourth quarter of 2014. No assurances can be given that the Company will be successful in arranging the further funding needed to continue the execution of its business plan including the development and commercialization of new products, or if successful, on what terms. Failure to obtain such funding will require management to substantially curtail, if not cease operations, which will result in a material adverse effect on the financial position and results of operations of the Company.
Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Working Capital
At year end December 31, 2013 we had cash and cash equivalents of $1.2 million. At year ended December 31, 2012 we had $2.0 million of cash and cash equivalents. At December 31, 2013 working capital was $4.5 million compared to a working capital of $4.8 million at December 31, 2012. Cash equivalents consist of short-term liquid investments with original maturities of no more than six months and are readily convertible into cash.
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
In 2013, $6.2 million was used for operating activities. Of the net cash used in 2013, $5.8 million was used to fund the operations of the business while $0.4 million was generated from changes in operating assets and liabilities. Of the net cash used of $7.7 million in 2012, $6.8 million was used to fund the operations of the business while $0.9 million was used to fund changes in operating assets and liabilities
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Net cash used by investing activities for year ended December 31, 2013 was $0.2 million compared to net cash used by investing activities of $0.9 million for the same period in 2012. Investing activities were primarily for purchases of property and equipment.
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Net cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2013 was $5.6 million compared to net cash provided by financing activities of $8.5 million for the same period in 2012. Cash from financing activities is being used to fund ongoing operational requirements, research & development, administrative and capital needs.
Significant Financing Arrangements
On May 8, 2013 we entered into a private placement transaction with respect to the issuance of $9.0 million principal amount of Senior Convertible Notes and $1.0 million principal amount of Subordinated Convertible Notes.
Description of the Private Placement and Convertible Notes
$9 Million Financing Transaction
On May 7, 2013 (“Closing”), we entered into a financing transaction for the sale of our Senior Convertible Notes (“Senior Convertible Notes”) and warrants issued by us in connection therewith (“Senior Warrants”) with gross proceeds of $9 million to us. On Closing, we received cash proceeds of $3 million and deposit an additional $6 million into a series of control accounts in our name. We are permitted to withdraw funds from our control accounts (i) in connection with certain conversions of the Senior Convertible Notes or (ii) otherwise, as follows: $500 thousand on each 30 day anniversary of the Effective Date commencing on the 60th day after the Effective Date until there are no more funds in the control accounts (each, a “Funds Release”).
We received approximately $2.76 million in net proceeds at Closing, after deducting our placement agent’s fee of $240,000. Our other offering expenses, other than our placement agent’s fee, were approximately $100,000, which expenses were paid out of the proceeds at Closing. At each Funds Release, we received approximately $460 thousand in net proceeds, after deducting our placement agent’s fee of $40,000.
| 23 |
Securities Purchase Agreement
The Senior Convertible Notes and Senior Warrants were issued pursuant to the terms of a Securities Purchase Agreement (“Purchase Agreement”) among us and the Investors. The Purchase Agreement provided for the sale of the Senior Convertible Notes and Senior Warrants for gross proceeds of $9 million to us.
Senior Convertible Notes
Ranking
The Senior Convertible Notes are senior unsecured obligations of the Company, subject only to certain secured obligations of the Company for up to a maximum of $1 million of government issued indebtedness for purchase of plant and machinery and other purchase money financing for property, plant and equipment.
Maturity Date
Unless earlier converted or redeemed, the Senior Convertible Notes mature 21 months from the Closing (“Maturity Date”), subject to the right of the investors to extend the date (i) if an event of default under the Senior Convertible Notes has occurred and is continuing or any event shall have occurred and be continuing that with the passage of time and the failure to cure would result in an event of default under the Senior Convertible Notes and (ii) for a period of 20 business days after the consummation of a fundamental transaction if certain events occur.
Interest
The Senior Convertible Notes bear interest at the rate of 8% per annum and are compounded monthly, on the first calendar day of each calendar month. The interest rate will increase to 18% per annum upon the occurrence and continuance of an event of default (as described below).
Interest on the Senior Convertible Notes is payable in arrears on each Installment Date (as defined below). If a holder elects to convert or redeem all or any portion of a Senior Convertible Note prior to the Maturity Date, all accrued and unpaid interest on the amount being converted or redeemed will also be payable. If we elect to redeem all or any portion of a Senior Convertible Note prior to the Maturity Date, all accrued and unpaid interest on the amount being redeemed will also be payable.
Conversion
All amounts due under the Senior Convertible Notes are convertible at any time, in whole or in part, at the option of the holders into shares of our common stock at a fixed conversion price, which is subject to adjustment as described below. The Senior Convertible Notes are initially convertible into shares of our common stock at the initial price of $0.264 per share. This conversion price is subject to adjustment for stock splits, combinations or similar events and “full ratchet” antidilution provisions.
Payment of Principal and Interest
We have agreed to make amortization payments with respect to the principal amount of each Senior Convertible Note in shares of our common stock, subject to the satisfaction of certain equity conditions, or at our option, in cash on each of the following installment dates:
| • | the twenty-third trading day after the earlier of: |
| • | the initial effective date of a registration statement filed in connection with this offering or |
| • | October 1, 2013; the first trading day of the calendar month immediately following the initial installment date (or if such date is less than twenty trading days after the initial installment date, the second calendar month immediately following the initial installment date to the extent); and then each month through and including the Maturity Date, each in an amount equal to 1/9 of the principal amount of each Senior Convertible Note. |
The holder of each Senior Convertible Note agrees that, with respect to shares of our common stock received in payment of a Senior Convertible Note as described above, to not sell shares of our common stock during any trading day in an amount, in the aggregate, exceeding 15% of the composite aggregate share trading volume of the common stock measured at the time of each sale of securities during such trading day.
| 24 |
Acceleration and Deferral of Amortization Amounts
During each period after an installment date and prior to the immediately subsequent installment date, a holder may elect to accelerate the amortization of a Senior Convertible Note at the applicable amortization conversion price for such prior installment date, if either:
| • | in the aggregate, all such accelerations in such period does not exceed the sum of two (2) other installment amounts (or, if the Company has delivered shares of Common Stock in satisfaction of the entire installment amount of such installment date, one (1) other installment amount), | |
| • | no more than five (5) separate accelerations have been consummated in such period, or | |
| • | such holder has not accelerated any portion of any installment amount in six (6) prior periods. |
The holder of a Senior Convertible Note may, at the holder’s election by giving notice to us, defer the payment of the installment amount due on any installment dates, in whole or in part, to another installment date, in which case the amount deferred will become part of such subsequent Installment Date and will continue to accrue interest.
Events of Default
The Senior Convertible Notes contain standard and customary events of default including but not limited: (i) failure to register our Common Stock within certain time periods; (ii) failure to make payments when due under the Senior Convertible Notes; and (iii) bankruptcy or insolvency of the Company.
If an event of default occurs, each holder may require us to redeem all or any portion of the Senior Convertible Notes (including all accrued and unpaid interest thereon), in cash, at a price equal to the greater of (i) up to 125% of the amount being redeemed, depending on the nature of the default, and (ii) the intrinsic value of the shares of Common Stock then issuable upon conversion of the Senior Convertible Note.
Fundamental Transactions
The Senior Convertible Notes prohibit us from entering into specified transactions involving a change of control, unless the successor entity assumes in writing all of our obligations under the Senior Convertible Notes under a written agreement.
In the event of transactions involving a change of control, the holder of a Senior Convertible Note will have the right to require us to redeem all or any portion of the Senior Convertible Note it holds (including all accrued and unpaid thereon) at a price equal to the greater 125% of the amount of the Senior Convertible Note being redeemed and the intrinsic value of the shares of Common Stock then issuable upon conversion of the Senior Convertible Note being redeemed.
Limitations on Conversion and Issuance
A Senior Convertible Note may not be converted and shares of common stock may not be issued under the Senior Convertible Notes if, after giving effect to the conversion or issuance, the holder together with its affiliates would beneficially own in excess of 4.99% of our outstanding shares of common stock. At each holder’s option, the Senior Convertible Note Blocker may be raised or lowered to any other percentage not in excess of 9.99%, except that any raise will only be effective upon 61-days’ prior notice to us.
Senior Warrants
The Senior Warrants entitle the holders of the Senior Warrants to purchase, in aggregate, 17,281,107 million shares of our common stock. The Senior Warrants will not be exercisable until the six month anniversary of the Closing and will expire 5 years from the date of first exercise. The Senior Warrants are initially exercisable at an exercise price equal to $0.302, subject to certain adjustments.
The Senior Warrants may be exercised for cash, provided that, if there is no effective registration statement available registering the exercise of the Senior Warrants, the Senior Warrants may be exercised on a cashless basis.
The exercise price of the Senior Warrants is subject to adjustment for stock splits, combinations or similar events, and, in this event, the number of shares issuable upon the exercise of the Senior Warrant will also be adjusted so that the aggregate exercise price shall be the same immediately before and immediately after the adjustment. In addition, the exercise price is also subject to a “full ratchet” anti-dilution adjustment where if we issue or are deemed to have issued securities at a price lower than the then applicable exercise price.
| 25 |
Limitations on Exercise
The Senior Warrants may not be exercised if, after giving effect to the exercise, the holder of the Senior Warrant together with its affiliates would beneficially own in excess of 4.99% of our outstanding shares of common stock. At each holder’s option, the warrant blocker applicable to the exercise of the Senior Warrants may be raised or lowered to any other percentage not in excess of 9.99%, except that any increase will only be effective upon 61-days’ prior notice to us.
Fundamental Transactions
The Senior Warrants prohibit us from entering into specified transactions involving a change of control, unless the successor entity assumes all of our obligations under the Senior Warrants under a written agreement before the transaction is completed. When there is a transaction involving a permitted change of control, a holder of a Senior Warrant will have the right to require us to repurchase the holder’s Senior Warrant for a purchase price in cash equal to the Black Scholes value (as calculated under the Senior Warrants) of the then unexercised portion of the Senior Warrant.
Registration Rights Agreement
The Company entered into a Registration Rights Agreement with the Holders as of the date of Closing. Under this Agreement, the Company has agreed to register 125% of the shares issuable under the Notes and 100% of the shares issuable under the Senior Warrants, with filing to occur no later than 20 days of the Closing and with effectiveness to occur no later than 75 days of the Closing. If we are unable to meet either of these deadlines, we may be required to pay certain cash damages under the Registration Rights Agreement or, with the passage of additional time, an Event of Default under the Notes may occur.
$1 Million Financing Transaction
Simultaneously with the Closing of the $9 million financing transaction, the Company sold $1 million principal amount of Subordinated Convertible Notes to investors consisting of management and directors of the Company and one individual investor. The sale of the Subordinated Convertible Notes did not carry any additional fees and expenses, so the entire $1 million investment netted to the Company. The Subordinated Convertible Notes are subordinated in right of repayment to the Convertible Notes to the Company and mature 91 days subsequent to the Maturity Date of the Convertible Notes. The Subordinated Convertible Notes bear interest at the rate of 8% per annum which shall accrue. Once 2/3 of the Senior Convertible Notes have been repaid, then the Subordinated Convertible Notes may be converted and/or prepaid in cash or in shares so long as there is no Event of Default with respect to the Convertible Notes and all Equity Conditions of the Senior Convertible Notes are met. The conversion price for the Subordinated Convertible Notes is $0.264 per share. The holders of the Subordinated Convertible Notes were issued five year warrants to purchase 1,920,123 shares of Company common stock. Each warrant has an exercise price of $0.302 per share.
On February 3, 2012, we completed a registered direct common stock offering at a price of $0.35 per share. This straight equity transaction, at a 10% discount to market based on trailing average, provided total gross proceeds of $9.4 million and net cash proceeds of $8.6 million to us after allowing for placement fees and expenses of the offering.
The “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition or Plan of Operation” section of this Annual Report discusses our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. To prepare these consolidated financial statements, we must make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities. These estimates also affect our reported revenues and expenses. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates its estimates and judgment, including those related to revenue recognition, accrued expenses, financing operations and contingencies and litigation. Management bases its estimates and judgment on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. The following represents a summary of our critical accounting policies, defined as those policies that we believe are the most important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations and that require management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effects of matters that are inherently uncertain.
Critical Accounting Policies, Judgments and Estimates
Use of Estimates: The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States requires management to make estimates, assumptions and judgments that affect reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statement and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from the estimates.
| 26 |
Principles of Consolidation: The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Axion Power Battery Manufacturing, Inc., APC and C&T. All significant inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Derivative Financial Instruments: The Company’s objective in using derivative financial instruments is to obtain the lowest cash cost-source of funds. Derivative liabilities are recognized in the consolidated balance sheets at fair value based on the criteria specified in FASB ASC topic 815-40 " Derivatives and Hedging – Contracts in Entity’s own Equity ". The estimated fair value of derivative liabilities is calculated using either the Black-Scholes-Merton method or the Monte Carlo simulation model where applicable and such estimates are revalued at each balance sheet date, with changes in value recorded as income or expense in the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss.
Inventory: Inventory is recorded at the lower of cost or market value, and adjusted as appropriate for changes in valuation and obsolescence. Adjustments to the valuation and obsolescence reserves are made after analyzing market conditions, current and projected sales activity, inventory costs and composition to determine appropriate reserve levels.
Revenue Recognition: The Company recognizes revenue when there is persuasive evidence of an agreement, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the sales price to the buyer is fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured. Evidence of an agreement and fixed or determinable sales price is predominantly based on a customer purchase order or other form of written sales order or written agreement. Sales on account are approved only for credit-worthy customers; otherwise payment is generally received prior to shipment. Shipping terms are generally FOB shipping point and revenue is recognized when product is shipped to the customer. In limited cases, if terms are FOB destination or contingent upon collection by a prime contractor, then in these cases, revenue is recognized when the product is delivered to the customer’s delivery site or the conditions for collection have been fulfilled. The Company records sales net of discounts and estimated customer allowances and returns. We offer a 90 day free replacement warranty on some specialty collector car and motorsports products. Collector car products also carry a four year prorated warranty that begins at the end of the 90 days. To date, our warranty exposure on these products has been minimal. Flooded battery sales do not have standard warranty provisions and instead are sold at a discount in lieu of warranty. There are no other post shipment obligations that may impact the timing of revenue recognition for the year ending December 31, 2013.
Cost of Sales-Idle Capacity: Idle capacity consists of direct production costs in excess of charges allocated to our finished goods in production. Operating costs include labor, production supplies, repairs and maintenance. Our charges for labor and overhead allocated to our finished goods are determined on a basis which is calculated presuming normal capacity utilization of two shifts per day, five days per week, which is lower than our actual costs incurred. Operating costs in excess of production allocations are expensed in the period incurred rather than added to the cost of finished goods produced. Idle capacity expenses for the year ended December 31, 2013 are $1,758,407. The Company has reclassified amounts identified as “idle capacity” for the year ended December 31, 2012 of $1,534,138 and has reclassified that the expense as part of cost of sales. The year over year increase is due to higher material and labor costs and a year-end lower of cost and market adjustment to inventory.
Grants: We recognize government grants when there is a reasonable assurance that we will comply with the conditions attached to the grant arrangement and the grant will be received. For reimbursements of expenses, the government grants are recognized as reduction of the related expense. For reimbursements of capital expenditures, the grants are recognized as a reduction of the basis of the asset. The grant is recognized in profit or loss over the life of a depreciable asset as reduced depreciation expense.
Stock-Based Compensation: Stock-based compensation related to employee and non-employees is recognized as compensation expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and is based on the fair value of the services received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more readily determinable. Our accounting policy for equity instruments issued to consultants and vendors in exchange for goods and services follows the provisions of FASB ASC 505-50 “Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees”. The measurement date for the fair value of the equity instruments issued is determined at the earlier of (1) the date at which a commitment for performance by the consultant or vendor is reached or (2) the date at which the consultant or vendor’s performance is complete. In the case of equity instruments issued to consultants, the fair value of the equity instrument is recognized over the term of the consulting agreement.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.
| 27 |
Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and
Stockholders of Axion Power International, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Axion Power International, Inc. as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2013. Axion Power International, Inc.’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Axion Power International, Inc. as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2013 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 4 to the financial statements, these conditions raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 4. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of asset carrying amounts or the amount and classification of liabilities that might result should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.
/s/ EFP Rotenberg, LLP
EFP Rotenberg, LLP
Rochester, New York
March 31, 2014
| 28 |
| AXION POWER INTERNATIONAL, INC. | |||||
| CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS |
| December 31, 2013 | December 31, 2012 | |||||||
| ASSETS | ||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 1,169,093 | $ | 2,004,391 | ||||
| Restricted cash | 3,780,341 | - | ||||||
| Accounts receivable, net | 562,583 | 771,410 | ||||||
| Other current assets | 281,055 | 194,975 | ||||||
| Inventory, net | 2,250,637 | 2,838,791 | ||||||
| Total current assets | 8,043,709 | 5,809,567 | ||||||
| Property & equipment, net | 6,698,536 | 7,963,041 | ||||||
| Other receivables | 29,000 | 41,000 | ||||||
| Total assets | $ | 14,771,245 | $ | 13,813,608 | ||||
| LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY | ||||||||
| Accounts payable | $ | 420,337 | $ | 581,503 | ||||
| Other liabilities | 352,857 | 305,510 | ||||||
| Note payable | 104,777 | 113,921 | ||||||
| Accrued interest convertible notes | 52,001 | - | ||||||
| Subordinated convertible notes, net of discount | 583,574 | - | ||||||
| Senior convertible notes, net of discount | 2,046,948 | - | ||||||
| Total current liabilities | 3,560,494 | 1,000,934 | ||||||
| Deferred revenue | 922,362 | 1,262,295 | ||||||
| Note payable | 219,722 | 331,247 | ||||||
| Derivative liability senior warrants | 518,433 | - | ||||||
| Derivative liabilities | - | 1,217 | ||||||
| Total liabilities | 5,221,011 | 2,595,693 | ||||||
| Stockholders' equity | ||||||||
| Convertible preferred stock-12,500,000 shares authorized | ||||||||
Series A preferred – 2,000,000 shares designated 0 shares issued and outstanding | - | - | ||||||
| Common stock-350,000,000 shares authorized $0.0001 par value | ||||||||
| 180,401,405 issued & outstanding (113,260,006 in 2012) | 18,039 | 11,326 | ||||||
| Additional paid in capital | 106,302,018 | 96,013,439 | ||||||
| Retained Earnings(Deficit) | (96,518,212 | ) | (84,555,174 | ) | ||||
| Cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment | (251,611 | ) | (251,676 | ) | ||||
| Total stockholders' equity | 9,550,234 | 11,217,915 | ||||||
| Total liabilities & stockholders’ equity | $ | 14,771,245 | $ | 13,813,608 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
| 29 |
| AXION POWER INTERNATIONAL, INC. | |||||||||
| CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS and COMPREHENSIVE LOSS |
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||
| 2013 | 2012 | |||||||
| Net sales | $ | 10,187,362 | $ | 9,779,711 | ||||
| Cost of tangible goods sold | 10,219,654 | 9,840,755 | ||||||
| Cost of goods sold – idle capacity | 1,758,407 | 1,534,138 | ||||||
| Gross profit | (1,790,699 | ) | (1,595,182 | ) | ||||
| Research and development | 2,171,954 | 2,552,581 | ||||||
| Selling, general and administrative | 4,591,054 | 4,404,040 | ||||||
| Other (income) expense | (322,683 | ) | (1,490 | ) | ||||
| Operating loss | (8,231,024 | ) | (8,550,313 | ) | ||||
| Change in value of senior warrants, gain | (2,419,568 | ) | - | |||||
| Change in value conversion feature senior notes, gain | (1,511,968 | ) | - | |||||
| Debt discount amortization expense | 3,771,948 | - | ||||||
| Interest expense, note payable | 19,405 | 17,594 | ||||||
| Extinguishment loss on senior notes conversion | 1,957,689 | - | ||||||
| Derivative revaluations (gain) loss | (1,217 | ) | (14,626 | ) | ||||
| Interest on convertible notes | 1,915,725 | - | ||||||
| Loss before income taxes | (11,963,038 | ) | (8,553,281 | ) | ||||
| Income taxes | - | - | ||||||
| Net Loss | (11,963,038 | ) | (8,553,281 | ) | ||||
| Foreign Translation Adjustment | 65 | (4 | ) | |||||
| Comprehensive Income/(Loss) | $ | (11,962,973 | ) | $ | (8,553,285 | ) | ||
| Basic and diluted net loss per share | $ | (0.09 | ) | $ | (0.08 | ) | ||
| Weighted average common shares outstanding | 127,351,677 | 110,689,664 | ||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
| 30 |
AXION POWER INTERNATIONAL, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||
| 2013 | 2012 | |||||||
| Operating Activities | ||||||||
| Net Loss | $ | (11,963,038 | ) | $ | (8,553,281 | ) | ||
| Adjustments to reconcile deficit accumulated for noncash items | ||||||||
| Depreciation expense | 1,505,944 | 1,320,594 | ||||||
| Derivative revaluations (gain) loss | (1,217 | ) | (14,626 | ) | ||||
| Change in value senior warrants, gain | (2,419,568 | ) | - | |||||
| Change in value conversion feature senior notes, gain | (1,511,968 | ) | - | |||||
| Debt discount amortization expense | 3,771,948 | - | ||||||
| Interest accrued, senior convertible notes paid in common stock | 1,180,870 | - | ||||||
| Debt discount amortization expense on subordinated note | 81,368 | - | ||||||
| Extinguishment loss on senior notes conversion | 1,957,689 | - | ||||||
| Amortization deferred finance costs | 601,486 | - | ||||||
| Stock based compensation expense | 201,757 | 445,966 | ||||||
| Changes in operating assets & liabilities | ||||||||
| Accounts receivable | 208,827 | - | ||||||
| - | (462,053 | ) | ||||||
| Other receivables | - | 140,389 | ||||||
| Other current assets | (19,150 | ) | (27,673 | ) | ||||
| Inventory, net | 588,154 | (121,618 | ) | |||||
| Accounts payable | (161,166 | ) | 61,145 | |||||
| Other current liabilities | 43,507 | (141,742 | ) | |||||
| Accrued interest | 52,001 | - | ||||||
| Deferred revenue | (339,933 | ) | (311,667 | ) | ||||
| Cash (used) by operating activities | (6,222,489 | ) | (7,664,566 | ) | ||||
| Investing Activities | ||||||||
| Other receivables | 12,000 | 12,000 | ||||||
| Capital expenditures | (241,439 | ) | (866,472 | ) | ||||
| Net cash used by investing activities | (229,439 | ) | (854,472 | ) | ||||
| Financing Activities | ||||||||
| Repayment of note payable | (120,670 | ) | (99,089 | ) | ||||
| Proceeds from senior and subordinated convertible notes | 10,000,000 | - | ||||||
| Net proceeds from sale of common stock | 8,634,881 | |||||||
| Payment of debt issuance costs | (482,424 | ) | - | |||||
| Amount deposited into restricted cash account | (3,780,341 | ) | - | |||||
| Net cash provided (used) by financing activities | 5,616,565 | 8,535,792 | ||||||
| Net change in cash and cash equivalents | (835,363 | ) | 16,758 | |||||
| Effect of exchange rate on cash | 65 | (4 | ) | |||||
| Cash and cash equivalents - beginning | 2,004,391 | 1,987,637 | ||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents - ending | $ | 1,169,093 | $ | 2,004,391 | ||||
| Supplemental Schedule of Non Cash Investing and Financing Activities: | ||||||||
| Common stock issued for principal payments on senior notes $6,275,000 | ||||||||
| Warrants issued for placement agent fees $172,804 | ||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
| 31 |
Axion Power International, Inc.
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Equity
For Periods Ended December 31, 2013 and 2012
| Common | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Shares | Common Stock Amount | Additional Paid- In Capital | Retained Earnings (Deficit) | Other Comprehensive Income (loss) | Total Stockholder’s Equity (Deficit) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Balance at December 31, 2011 | 85,531,114 | $ | 8,552 | $ | 86,953,180 | $ | (76,001,893 | ) | $ | (251,672 | ) | $ | 10,708,167 | |||||||||||
| Proceeds from common stock offering-net of costs | 27,651,870 | 2,766 | 8,632,115 | 8,634,881 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Stock based compensation | 77,022 | 8 | 428,144 | 428,152 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Net Loss | (8,553,281 | ) | (8,553,281 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Other comprehensive income (loss): | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Foreign currency translation adjustment | (4 | ) | (4 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Comprehensive Loss | (8,553,285 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance at December 31, 2012 | 113,260,006 | 11,326 | 96,013,439 | (84,555,174 | ) | (251,676 | ) | 11,217,915 | ||||||||||||||||
| Stock issuances related to senior convertible notes | 67,006,417 | 6,700 | 9,667,838 | 9,667,638 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Beneficial conversion feature associated with subordinated notes | 246,212 | 246,212 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Placement agent fees | 172,785 | 172,785 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Stock based compensation | 134,982 | 13 | 201,744 | 201,757 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Net loss | (11,963,038 | ) | (11,963,038 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Other comprehensive income (loss): | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Foreign currency translation adjustment | 65 | 65 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Comprehensive loss | (11,962,973 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance at December 31, 2013 | 180,401,405 | $ | 18,039 | $ | 106,302,018 | $ | (96,518,212 | ) | $ | (251,611 | ) | $ | 9,550,234 | |||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements
| 32 |
AXION POWER INTERNATIONAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1 — Basis of Presentation
These consolidated financial statements of Axion Power International, Inc., a Delaware corporation (API), include the operations of its wholly owned subsidiaries; Axion Power Battery Manufacturing, Inc. (APB), Axion Power Corporation, a Canadian Federal corporation (“APC”), and C & T Co. Inc., an Ontario corporation (“C&T”) (collectively, the “Company”).
Note 2 — Accounting Policies
Use of Estimates: The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates, assumptions and judgments that affect reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statement and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from the estimates.
Principles of Consolidation: The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Axion Power Battery Manufacturing, Inc., APC and C&T. All significant inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Segment Reporting: Management has determined that the Company is organized, managed and internally reported as one business segment.
Foreign Currency Translation: The accounts of APC and C&T are measured using the Canadian dollar as the functional currency for all the periods presented in the financial statements. The translation from Canadian dollars to U.S. dollars is performed for the balance sheet accounts using current exchange rates in effect at each of the balance sheet dates, and for the revenue and expense accounts using the average rate in effect during the periods. The resulting translation adjustments are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) within stockholders’ equity. Gains or losses resulting from transactions denominated in currencies other than the functional currency are included in the results of operations as incurred. Any gains or losses arising from the inter-company loan denominated in U.S. dollars are directly reflected in other comprehensive income, as the amounts are not expected to be repaid in the foreseeable future.
Comprehensive Income: The Company follows FASB ASC 220, “Comprehensive Income.” Comprehensive income is the change in equity of a business enterprise during a reporting period from transactions and other events and circumstances from non-owner sources. In addition to the Company’s net loss, the change in equity components under comprehensive income include any foreign currency translation adjustment.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments: FASB ASC 825, “Financial Instruments," requires disclosure of fair value information about certain financial instruments, including, but not limited to, cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, refundable tax credits, prepaid expenses, accounts payable, accrued expenses, notes payable to related parties and convertible debt-related securities. Fair value estimates discussed herein are based upon certain market assumptions and pertinent information available to management as of December 31, 2013 and 2012. The carrying value of the balance sheet financial instruments included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements approximated their fair values.
Cash and Cash Equivalents: The Company considers those short-term, highly liquid investments to be cash or cash equivalents. Our investment policy is that we only invest cash in U.S. Government Treasuries with original maturities of six months or less.
Accounts Receivable and Concentration of Credit Risk: The Company records its accounts receivable net of any allowance for doubtful accounts. The Company manages its credit risk exposure and establishes an allowance for doubtful accounts for accounts that are deemed at risk for collection. When management determines that an account is uncollectible, it is written off against the related allowance. An allowance in the amount of $10,500 was established as of December 31, 2013 compared to no allowance for the year ended December 31, 2012.
Inventory: Inventory is recorded at the lower of cost or market value, and adjusted as appropriate for decreases in valuation and obsolescence. Adjustments to the valuation and obsolescence reserves are made after analyzing market conditions, historical sales activity, inventory costs and inventory composition to determine appropriate reserve levels. Cost is determined using the first-in first-out (FIFO) method. Many components and raw materials we purchase have minimum order quantities.
| 33 |
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED
A summary of inventory at December 31, 2013 and 2012 is as follows:
| 2013 | 2012 | |||||||
| Raw materials | $ | 1,073,034 | $ | 945,763 | ||||
| Work in process | 1,235,029 | 1,677,605 | ||||||
| Finished goods | 163,228 | 471,935 | ||||||
| Inventory reserves | (220,654 | ) | (256,512 | ) | ||||
| $ | 2,250,637 | $ | 2,838,791 | |||||
Property and Equipment: Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Depreciation is computed using the straight line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, ranging from 3 to 22 years. Expenditures for renewals and betterments are capitalized. Expenditures for minor items are charged to repairs and maintenance expense. Gain or loss upon sale or retirement is reflected in operating results in the period the event takes place.
A summary of property and equipment at December 31, 2013 and 2012 is as follows:
| Estimated useful life | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||
| Construction in progress | $ | 434,082 | $ | 476,257 | ||||||
| Leasehold improvements | Lesser of lease term or 10 years | 530,091 | 382,680 | |||||||
| Machinery & equipment | 3-22 years | 11,323,042 | 11,186,840 | |||||||
| Less accumulated depreciation | (5,588,679 | ) | (4,082,736 | ) | ||||||
| Net | $ | 6,698,536 | $ | 7,963,041 | ||||||
Depreciation expense was $ 1,505,944 and $1,320,594 for the years ended December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.
Certain of our machinery and equipment amounting to $1,582,111 are secured by the Pennsylvania Department of Community and Economic Development in relation to the Machinery and Equipment Loan Fund financing. The initial loan proceeds in the amount of $776,244 were received by us on September 14, 2009. The proceeds of the loan were used to defray part of the cost of equipment purchased for use at our Green Ridge Road and Clover Lane facilities. The loan bore an interest at the rate of 3% interest per annum and payable in equal monthly installments of principal and interest over a period of seven years, maturing on October 1, 2016. Effective October 23, 2013, the interest rate was increased to 5.25% as Axion was unable to achieve the required headcount in order to maintain the lower interest rate. The 5.25% interest rate will continue through the remainder of the loan.
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets: The Company adopted the provisions of FASB ASC 360-10-15-3, “Impairment or Disposal of Long-lived Assets.” This standard requires, among other things, that long-lived assets be reviewed for potential impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts may not be recoverable. The assessment of possible impairment is based on the ability to recover the carrying value of the asset from the expected future pre-tax cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) of the related operations. If these expected cash flows are less than the carrying value of such asset, an impairment loss is recognized for the difference between estimated fair value and carrying value. The primary measure of fair value is based on undiscounted future cash flows. The measurement of impairment requires management to make estimates of these cash flows related to long-lived assets, as well as other fair value determinations. There was no impairment loss recorded for the years ended December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012.
Derivative Financial Instruments: The Company’s objectives in using derivative financial instruments are to obtain the lowest cash cost-source of funds. Derivative liabilities are recognized in the consolidated balance sheets at fair value based on the criteria specified in FASB ASC topic 815-40 " Derivatives and Hedging – Contracts in Entity’s own Equity ". The estimated fair value of the derivative liabilities is calculated using either the Black-Scholes-Merton or Monte Carlo simulation model method where applicable and such estimates are revalued at each balance sheet date, with changes in value recorded as other income or expense in the consolidated statement of operations. As a result of the Company’s adoption of ASC topic 815-40, effective January 1, 2009 some of the Company’s warrants are now accounted for as derivatives. (See Footnote 3)
Certain warrants classified as derivatives at year end December 31, 2012 expired during 2013.
| 34 |
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED
Revenue Recognition: The Company recognizes revenue when there is persuasive evidence of an agreement, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the sales price to the buyer is fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured. Evidence of an agreement and fixed or determinable sales price is predominantly based on a customer purchase order or other form of written sales order or written agreement. Sales on account are approved only for credit-worthy customers; otherwise partial or full payment.is received prior to shipment. Shipping terms are generally FOB shipping point and revenue is recognized when product is shipped to the customer. In limited cases, if terms are FOB destination or contingent upon collection by a prime contractor, then in these cases, revenue is recognized when the product is delivered to the customer’s designated delivery site or the conditions for collection have been fulfilled. The Company records sales net of discounts and estimated customer allowances and returns. We offer a 90 day free replacement warranty on some specialty collector car and motorsports products. Collector car products also carry a four year prorated warranty that begins at the end of the 90 days. To date, our warranty exposure on these battery products has been minimal. Flooded battery sales do not have standard warranty provisions and instead are sold at a discount in lieu of warranty. There were no other post shipment obligations that may impact the timing of revenue recognition for the year ending December 31, 2013.
Cost of Sales - Idle Capacity: Idle capacity consists of direct production costs in excess of charges allocated to our finished goods in production. Operating costs include labor, production supplies, repairs and maintenance. Our charges for labor and overhead allocated to our finished goods are determined on a basis which is calculated presuming normal capacity utilization of two shifts per day, five days per week, which is lower than our actual costs incurred. Operating costs in excess of production allocations are expensed in the period incurred rather than added to the cost of finished goods produced. Idle capacity expenses for the year ended December 31, 2013 are $1,758,407. The Company has reclassified amounts identified as “idle capacity” for the year ended December 31, 2012 of $1,534,138 and has reclassified the expense as part of cost of sales. The year over year increase is due to higher material and labor costs and a year-end lower of cost and market adjustment to inventory.
Grants: The Company recognizes government grants when there is reasonable assurance that the Company will comply with the conditions attached to the grant arrangement and the grant will be received. Government grants are recognized in the consolidated statements of operations on a systematic basis over the periods in which the Company recognizes the related costs for which the government grant is intended to compensate. Specifically, when government grants are related to reimbursements for cost of revenues or operating expenses, the government grants are recognized as a reduction of the related expense in the consolidated statements of operations. For government grants related to reimbursements of capital expenditures, the government grants are recognized as a reduction of the basis of the asset and recognized in the consolidated statements of operations over the estimated useful life of the depreciable asset as a reduced depreciation expense. The Company records government grants receivable in the consolidated balance sheets in other receivables. Deferred revenue is amortized into income over the estimated useful life of the related equipment. As of December 31, 2013, the liability for deferred revenue was $ 922,362 and there are no grant receivables at either December 31, 2013 or December 31, 2012. During the year 2013, $339,934 of income was recorded for the amortization of deferred revenue compared to $338,562 during 2012.
Stock based Compensation: Stock-based compensation related to employees and non-employees is recognized as compensation expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss is based on the fair value of the services received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more readily determinable. Our accounting policy for equity instruments issued to consultants and vendors in exchange for goods and services follows the provisions of ASC 505-50 “Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees”. The measurement date for the fair value of the equity instruments issued is determined at the earlier of (1) the date at which a commitment for performance by the consultant or vendor is reached or (2) the date at which the consultant or vendor’s performance is complete. In the case of equity instruments issued to consultants, the fair value of the equity instrument is recognized over the term of the consulting agreement.
Income Taxes: Deferred income taxes are recorded in accordance with FASB ASC 740, “Income Taxes”, and deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences between financial reporting and the tax basis of assets and liabilities using the tax rates and laws in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. FASB ASC 740 provides for the recognition of deferred tax assets if realization of such assets is more likely than not to occur. Realization of net deferred tax assets is dependent upon generating sufficient taxable income in future years in appropriate tax jurisdictions to realize benefit from the reversal of temporary differences and from net operating loss, or NOL carry forwards. The Company has determined it is more likely than not that the deferred tax asset resulting from these timing differences will not materialize and have provided a valuation allowance against the entire net deferred tax asset. Management will continue to evaluate the realizability of the deferred tax asset and its related valuation allowance. If the assessment of the deferred tax assets or the corresponding valuation allowance were to change, the Company would record the related adjustment to income during the period in which the determination is made. The tax rate may also vary based on actual results and the mix of income or loss in domestic and foreign tax jurisdictions in which operations take place. The provision for taxes represents corporate-level franchise taxes which may be based on assets, equity, capital stock or a variation thereof.
| 35 |
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements: During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company has conformed its presentation of results of operations, in accordance with new guidance on the presentation of comprehensive income (loss). The guidance requires total comprehensive income (loss) for interim periods to be presented in a single continuous statement or in two separate, but consecutive, statements. The new guidance does not change where the components of comprehensive income (loss) are recognized.
There are no new accounting standards if adopted that would have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
Reclassifications: Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to current year presentation.
Note 3. — Senior Convertible Notes and Warrants, and Subordinated Notes and Warrants
On May 8, 2013, the Company consummated the sale of $9 million in aggregate principal amount of senior convertible notes (the “Senior Notes”) due on February 8, 2015 and warrants (the “Senior Warrants”) to various institutional investors (“Investors”). At closing, the Company received $2.76 million in net proceeds, after deducting placement agent fees of $240,000. Total offering expenses were $494,500 and were recorded as deferred financing fees. The $6,000,000 balance of the gross proceeds from the sale of Senior Notes was deposited into a series of control accounts in the Company’s name. Withdrawals from the control accounts are permitted (i) in connection with certain conversions of the Senior Notes or (ii) otherwise, as follows: $500,000 on each 30 day anniversary of the closing date (May 8, 2013) commencing on the 60th day after the effective date until there are no more funds in the control accounts. The Senior Notes and Senior Warrants and the Subordinated Notes and Subordinated Warrants described below were issued in transactions exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. As of December 31, 2013, we have received one $2,000,000 funds release and an additional $212,500 due to accelerated note conversions by two investors.
Securities Purchase Agreement
The Senior Convertible Notes and Senior Warrants were issued pursuant to the terms of a Securities Purchase Agreement (“Purchase Agreement”) entered into among us and the Investors. The Purchase Agreement provided for the sale of the Senior Convertible Notes and Senior Warrants for gross proceeds of $9 million to us.
Ranking - The Senior Notes are senior unsecured obligations of the Company, subject only to certain secured obligations of the Company for up to a maximum of $1 million of government issued indebtedness for purchase of plant and machinery and other purchase money financing for property, plant and equipment.
Maturity Date - Unless earlier converted or redeemed, the Senior Notes mature 21 months from the closing date subject to the right of the investors to extend the date (i) if an event of a default under the Senior Notes has occurred and (ii) for a period of 20 business days after the consummation of a fundamental transaction if certain events occur.
Interest - The Senior Notes bear interest at the rate of 8% per year, compounded monthly on the first calendar day of each calendar month. The interest rate will increase to 18% per year upon the occurrence and continuance of an event of default (as described below).
Conversion - The Senior Notes are convertible at any time at the option of the holders, into shares of the Company’s common stock at an initial conversion price of $0.264 per share (subsequent conversions are based on the company’s volume weighted average price per share). The conversion price is subject to adjustment for stock splits, combinations or similar events. In addition, the conversion price is also subject to a “full ratchet” anti-dilution adjustment if the company issues or is deemed to have issued securities at a price lower than the then applicable conversion price. In the event certain equity conditions are not met, the company may be prevented from issuing shares to satisfy the installments due on the note.
| 36 |
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED
The Senior Notes may not be converted with respect to any note holder if, after giving effect to the conversion or issuance, the holder together with its affiliates would beneficially own in excess of 4.99% of the Company’s outstanding shares of common stock. At each holder’s option, the limit on percentage ownership may be raised or lowered to any other percentage not in excess of 9.99%, except that any raise will only be effective upon 61-days’ prior notice to the Company.
Events of Default
The Senior Notes contain standard and customary events of default including but not limited to: (i) failure to register our Common Stock within certain time periods; (ii) failure to make payments when due under the Senior Notes; and (iii) bankruptcy or insolvency of the Company.
If an event of default occurs, the Senior Note holders may require the Company to redeem all or any portion of the Senior Notes (including all accrued and unpaid interest thereon), in cash, at a price equal to the greater of (i) up to 125% of the amount being redeemed, depending on the nature of the default, and (ii) the intrinsic value of the shares of Common Stock then issuable upon conversion of the Convertible Note.
Fundamental Transactions
The Senior Notes prohibit the Company from entering into specified transactions involving a change of control, unless the successor entity assumes in writing all obligations under the Senior Notes under a written agreement.
In the event of transactions involving a change of control, the Senior Notes will be redeemable whole or in part (including all accrued and unpaid thereon) at a price equal to the greater 125% of the amount of the face value of the Senior Note being redeemed and the intrinsic value of the shares of Common Stock then issuable upon conversion of the Senior Note being redeemed.
Warrants
The Warrants entitle the holders to purchase, in the aggregate, 17,281,107 shares of common stock. The Warrants were exercisable beginning November 8, 2013 and will expire 5 years from the Closing Date. The Warrants are initially exercisable at an exercise price equal to $0.302, subject to certain adjustments.
The Warrants may be exercised for cash, provided that, if there is no effective registration statement available registering the exercise of the Warrants, the Warrants may be exercised on a cashless basis.
The exercise price of the Warrants is subject to adjustment for stock splits, combinations or similar events. In addition, the exercise price is also subject to a “full ratchet” anti-dilution adjustment if we issue or are deemed to have issued securities at a price lower than the then applicable exercise price.
The Warrants may not be exercised with respect to any warrant holder if, after giving effect to the exercise, the warrant holder together with its affiliates would beneficially own in excess of 4.99% of our outstanding shares of common stock. At each Warrant holder’s option, the limit on percentage ownership may be raised or lowered to any other percentage not in excess of 9.99%, except that any increase will only be effective upon 61-days’ prior notice to the Company.
The Senior Warrants prohibit the Company from entering into specified transactions involving a change of control, unless the successor entity assumes all obligations under the Senior Warrants under a written agreement before the transaction is completed. When there is a transaction involving a permitted change of control, a Senior Warrant holder will have the right to require us to repurchase their Senior Warrant for a purchase price in cash equal to the Black-Scholes value of the then unexercised portion of the Senior Warrant.
Accounting for the Conversion Option and Warrants
The Company first considered whether the Senior Notes met the criteria under ASC 480-10-25-14 to be recorded as a liability and determined that, due to the Senior Note’s differing potential settlement features, it did not meet the criteria. The Company next considered whether the conversion option met the definition of a derivative, requiring it to be bifurcated and recorded as a liability. Pursuant to ASC 815-40, due to full-ratchet down-round price protection on the conversion price of the Senior Notes and the exercise price of the Warrants, the Company determined that the conversion features of the Senior Notes and the exercise price of the Warrants, the Company determined that the conversion features of the Senior Notes and the exercise price of the Senior Warrants, the Company determined that the conversion features of the Senior Notes and the exercise features of the Senior Warrants are not indexed to the Company’s owned stock and must be recognized separately as a derivative liability in the consolidated balance sheet, measured at fair value and marked to market each reporting period until the Senior Notes have been fully paid or converted and the Senior Warrants fully exercised.
| 37 |
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED
The conversion feature of the Senior Notes was valued using the Monte Carlo simulation model under the following assumptions; (i) expected life of 0.9 years, (ii) volatility of 60%, (iii) risk-free interest rate of 0.10% and (iv) dividend rate of 0. The Senior Warrants were also valued using the Monte Carlo simulation model, under the following assumptions: (i) expected life of 5 years, (ii) volatility of 80%, (iii) risk-free interest rate of 0.75%, and (iv) dividend rate of zero. The initial fair values of the conversion feature and the warrants were estimated to be $2.9 million and $1.5 million, respectively, totaling $4.4 million. This amount was recorded as debt discount on May 8, 2013 and is being amortized over the term of the Senior Notes using the effective interest method. In addition, debt issuance costs totaling $494,500 are being amortized over the term of the note using the effective interest method.
As of December 31, 2013, the conversion feature was valued at $32 and the Senior Warrants were valued at $518,433. The change in fair value of $3,931,535 million was recorded as a non-cash (gain) in change in value of these derivatives for the quarter ended December 31, 2013. The Senior Warrants and the conversion feature of the Senior Notes are classified as a liability in the consolidated condensed balance sheet as follows:
| Warrants | Conversion Feature | Total | ||||||||||
| Original valuation – May 8, 2013 | $ | 2,938,000 | $ | 1,512,000 | $ | 4,450,000 | ||||||
| Adjustment to fair value | 2,419,567 | 1,511,968 | 3,931,535 | |||||||||
| Ending Balance-December 31, 2013 | $ | 518,433 | $ | 32 | $ | 518,465 | ||||||
Pursuant to the terms of the Senior Notes, the Company opted to pay the installment payments due prior to December 31, 2013 with shares of the Company’s common stock. As of December 31, 2013, the Company issued 61,385,008 shares of common stock at a weighted average conversion price of $0.1081 for the first $5,750,000 in principal and $1,180,870 of interest. In addition, 5,621,411 shares were issued for accelerated conversions netted a release of $ 525,000. A loss on extinguishment was recognized in the amount of $1,957,689 for the difference between the installment amount and the fair value of the shares at the issuance date. As of December 31, 2013, the principal balance of the Senior Notes (net of discount) was as follows:
| Convertible Note | Debt Discount | Net Total | ||||||||||
| Original valuation – May 8, 2013 | $ | 9,000,000 | $ | (4,450,000 | ) | $ | 4,550,000 | |||||
| Installation Payment in Shares | (6,275,000 | ) | - | (6,275,000 | ) | |||||||
| Amortization of debt discount | - | 3,771,948 | 3,771,948 | |||||||||
| Ending balance-December 31, 2013 | $ | 2,725,000 | $ | (678,052 | ) | $ | 2,046,948 | |||||
Placement Agent Warrants
Upon the closing of the issuance of the Senior Notes and Senior Warrants, the Company issued 909,090 warrants to its placement agent and is obligated to issue additional warrants when and if the Company receives further proceeds from the sale of the Senior Notes and Senior Warrants which are currently being held in the control accounts described above. The initial placement agent warrants have been recognized as additional financing fees and are being amortized over the life of the Senior Notes. These warrants were determined not to be derivative instruments, and as such they have been recorded as equity. The fair value of the initial issuance of 909,090 placement agent warrants was estimated to be $144,000 using the Black-Scholes model with the following assumptions: (i) expected life of 5 years, (ii) volatility of 80%, (iii) risk free interest rate of 0.75% and (iv) dividend yield of zero.
| 38 |
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED
Subordinated Convertible Notes and Subordinated Warrants
Simultaneously with the closing of the $9 million principal amount Senior Note transaction, the Company sold $1 million principal amount of its Subordinated Convertible Notes (the “Subordinated Notes”) to investors consisting of management and directors of the Company and one individual investor. The sale of the Subordinated Notes did not carry any additional fees and expenses, so the Company received the entire $1 million in proceeds from the Subordinated Notes at closing. The Subordinated Notes are subordinated in right of repayment to the Senior Notes and mature 91 days subsequent to the maturity date of the Senior Notes bear interest at the rate of 8% per year. Once 2/3 of the Senior Notes have been repaid, then the Subordinated Notes may be converted and/or prepaid in cash so long as there is no Event of Default with respect to the Senior Notes and all Equity Conditions (as defined in the securities purchase agreement for the Senior Notes) are met. The conversion price for the Subordinated Notes is $0.264 per share. The holders of the Subordinated Convertible Notes were issued five year warrants to purchase 1,920,123 shares of Company common stock (“Subordinated Warrants”). Each Subordinated Warrant has an exercise price of $0.302 per share.
As the conversion feature of the Subordinated Notes and the related warrants were determined not to be derivative instruments, in accordance with the guidance in ASC Topic 470-20 Debt with Conversion and Other Options (“ASC 470”), the Company first calculated the fair value of the warrants issued and then calculated the relative value of the note and determined that there was a beneficial conversion feature in the amount of $246,000. Conversion of the Subordinated Notes was conditioned upon 2/3 of the Senior Notes being repaid, and therefore the beneficial conversion feature was determined to be contingent and therefore not booked at the date of the issuance. At December 31, 2013, the contingency was met, and therefore, the beneficial conversion feature was recorded as additional debt discount net of $11,129 of amortization.
The fair value of the warrants, issued in connection with the Subordinated Notes is $304,000 in the aggregate and was calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: (i) expected life of 5 years, (ii) volatility of 80% (iii) risk free interest rate of 0.75% and (iv) dividend yield of zero.
The relative value of the warrants to the subordinated note was $263,000, which was the amount recorded as original debt discount.
The balance at December 31, 2013 related to the Subordinated Notes was comprised of:
| Subordinated convertible notes payable, related and unrelated parties at May 8, 2013 | $ | 1,000,000 | ||
| Unamortized debt discount | (416,426 | ) | ||
| Ending balance at December 31, 2013 | $ | 583,574 |
Fair Value Disclosure
The Company has two Level 3 financial instruments, Senior Warrants and the conversion feature associated with the Senior Notes, which are both recorded at fair value on a periodic basis. The Senior Warrants and the conversion feature are evaluated under the hierarchy of FASB ASC Subtopic 480-10, FASB ASC Paragraph 815-25-1 and FASB ASC Subparagraph 815-10-15-74 addressing embedded derivatives. The fair value of the warrants and the conversion feature are estimated using the Monte Carlo simulation model. As of December 31, 2013, the following table represents the Company’s fair value hierarchy for items that are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
| Fair | ||||||||||||||||
| Value | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | |||||||||||||
| Embedded note conversion feature | $ | 32 | - | - | $ | 32 | ||||||||||
| Warrant liability | $ | 518,433 | - | - | $ | 518,433 | ||||||||||
Note 4 — Going Concern
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. At December 31, 2013 the Company’s working capital was $4.5 million. The financial resources of the Company will not provide sufficient funds for the Company’s operations beyond September 30, 2014, as those operations currently exist. Subsequent funding will be required to fund the Company’s ongoing operations, working capital, and capital expenditures beyond September 30, 2014. No assurances can be given that the Company will be successful in arranging the further funds needed to continue the execution of its business plan, which includes the development and commercialization of new products, or even if further funding is available, upon what terms. Failure to obtain such funds on terms acceptable to the Company’s management will require management to substantially curtail, if not cease, operations, which will result in a material adverse effect on the financial position and results of operations of the Company. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might occur if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.
| 39 |
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED
Note 5 — Stockholders' Equity
Authorized Capitalization: The Company’s authorized capitalization includes 350,000,000 shares of common stock and 12,500,000 shares of preferred stock. The number of authorized common shares was increased by 150,000,000 pursuant to the Shareholder meeting vote on September 26, 2013.
Common Stock: At December 31, 2013, 180,401,405 shares of common stock were issued and outstanding. The holders of common stock are entitled to one vote for each share held of record on all matters to be voted on by stockholders. There is no cumulative voting with respect to the election of directors, with the result that the holders of more than 50% of the shares voted for the election of directors can elect all of the directors. Holders of common stock are entitled to receive dividends when and if declared by the board out of funds legally available. In the event of liquidation, dissolution or winding up, the common stockholders are entitled to share ratably in all assets remaining available for distribution to them after payment of liabilities and after provision has been made for each class of stock, if any, having preference over the common stock. The common stockholders have no conversion, preemptive or other subscription rights and there are no redemption provisions applicable to the common stock. All of the outstanding shares of common stock are fully paid and non-assessable.
Preferred Stock: The Company’s certificate of incorporation authorizes the issuance of 12,500,000 shares of blank check preferred stock. The Company’s board of directors has the power to establish the designation, rights and preferences of any preferred stock. Accordingly, the board of directors has the power, without stockholder approval, to issue preferred stock with dividend, liquidation, conversion, voting or other rights that could adversely affect the voting power or other rights of the holders of common stock. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, no shares of Series-A Convertible Preferred stock were issued and outstanding.
Warrants: The following table provides summary information on warrants outstanding as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, with summary information on the various warrants issued by the Company in private placement transactions, warrants exercised to date, warrants that are presently exercisable and the current exercise prices of such warrants.
| 2013 | 2012 | |||||||||||||||
| Shares | Weighted Average Exercise price | Shares | Weighted Average Exercise Price | |||||||||||||
| Warrants outstanding January 1 | 11,712,315 | $ | 0.83 | 11,896,070 | $ | 0.83 | ||||||||||
| Granted during year | 20,780,775 | 0.31 | - | - | ||||||||||||
| Exercised | - | - | - | |||||||||||||
| Lapsed | (11,666,654 | ) | 0.83 | (183,755 | ) | 2.35 | ||||||||||
| Outstanding at December 31 | 20,826,436 | $ | 0.30 | 11,712,315 | $ | 0.83 | ||||||||||
| Weighted average years remaining | 4.3 | 0.30 | ||||||||||||||
As of December 31, 2013 there are 17,281,107 warrants classified as derivative liabilities relating to senior convertible notes issued on May 8, 2013, which were exercisable on November 8, 2013. For year ended December 31, 2012 there were 1,085,714 warrants classed as derivative liabilities. Each reporting period the warrants are re-valued and adjusted through the caption “change in value senior warrants gain” on the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss.
| 40 |
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED
Note 6 – Equity Compensation
Incentive Stock Plan Approved by Stockholders: The Company’s stockholders have adopted an incentive stock plan for the benefit of its employees, consultants and advisors. Under the terms of the original plan, the Company was authorized to grant incentive awards for up to 1,000,000 shares of common stock. At the Company’s 2005 annual meeting, its shareholders increased the authorization under the incentive stock plan to 2,000,000 shares.
The incentive stock plan authorizes a variety of awards including incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, shares of restricted stock, and shares of phantom stock and stock bonuses. In addition, the plan authorizes the payment of cash bonuses when a participant is required to recognize income for federal income tax purposes because of the vesting of shares of restricted stock or the grant of a stock bonus.
The plan authorizes the grant of incentive awards to full-time employees of the Company who are not eligible to receive awards under the terms of an employment contract or another specialty plan. The plan also authorizes the grant of incentive awards to directors who are not eligible to participate in the Company’s outside directors’ stock option plan, independent agents, consultants and advisors who have contributed to the Company’s success.
The Compensation Committee administers the plan. The Committee has absolute discretion to decide which employees, consultants and advisors will receive incentive awards, the type of award to be granted and the number of shares covered by the award. The committee also determines the exercise prices, expiration dates and other features of awards.
The exercise price of incentive stock options must be equal to the fair market value of such shares on the date of the grant or, in the case of incentive stock options granted to the holder of more than 10% of the Company’s common stock, at least 110% of the fair market value of such shares on the date of the grant. The maximum exercise period for incentive stock options is ten years from the date of grant, or five years in the case of an individual who owns more than 10% of the Company’s common stock. The aggregate fair market value determined at the date of the option grant, of shares with respect to which incentive stock options are exercisable for the first time by the holder of the option during any calendar year, shall not exceed $100,000.
There are no incentive stock options outstanding at December 31, 2013.
Outside Directors' Stock Option Plan Approved by Stockholders: The Company’s stockholders have adopted an outside directors' stock option plan for the benefit of its non-employee directors in order to encourage their continued service as directors. Under the terms of the original plan, the Company was authorized to grant incentive awards for up to 125,000 shares of common stock. At the 2005 annual meeting, the Company’s shareholders increased the authorization under the incentive stock plan to 500,000 shares.
| On October 17, 2012, the Board of Directors amended the Axion Power International, Inc. independent director’s stock option plan to increase the number of shares of common stock available thereunder from 500,000 shares to 1,000,000 shares. |
On December 18, 2013, the Board of Directors amended the Axion Power International, Inc. independent director’s stock option plan and ratified the changes March 18, 2014, to increase the number of shares of common stock available thereunder from 1,000,000 shares to 3,000,000 shares.
Each eligible director who is, on or after the effective date, appointed to fill a vacancy on the Board or elected to serve as a member of the Board may participate in the plan. Each eligible director shall automatically be granted an option to purchase the maximum number of shares having an aggregate fair market value on the date of grant of twenty thousand dollars ($20,000). The option price of the stock subject to each option is required to be the fair market value of the stock on its date of grant. Options generally expire on the fifth anniversary of the date of grant. Any option granted under the plan shall become exercisable in full on the first anniversary of the date of grant, provided that the eligible director has not voluntarily resigned or been removed "for cause" as a member of the Board of Directors on or prior to the first anniversary of the date of grant (qualified option). Any qualified option shall remain exercisable after its first anniversary regardless of whether the optionee continues to serve as a member of the Board.
During 2013, the Company issued a total of 1,398,501 as follows: On September 26, 2013 the Company issued 498,501 options to one of its directors. The options will vest evenly at 166,167 per year over the next three years. These options are exercisable at a price of $0.12 per share, expiring five years from vest date and are valued at $37,836 utilizing the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model, with $9,964 recorded as compensation in 2013. During 2012 the Company issued 171,429 five year options to one of its directors, vesting one third per year over the next three years. These options are exercisable at a price of $0.35 per share, expiring five years from the vest date and are valued at $35,136 using the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model, with $6,832 recorded as compensation in 2012.
| 41 |
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED
During 2013 the company also issued to one of its employees 900,000 options of which 120,000 vested immediately with 20,000 vesting per month through September 30, 2016. These options are exercisable at a price of $0.15 per share, expiring five years from vest date and are valued at $64,836 utilizing the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model, with $5,403 recorded as compensation in 2013.
Stock Options Held by Officers, Employees, and Consultants Not Approved by Stockholders:
The Company uses the Black-Scholes-Merton Option Pricing Model to estimate the fair value of awards on the measurement date using the weighted average assumptions noted in the following table:
| Year | Interest rate % | Dividend Yield % | Expected Volatility % | Expected Life | ||||||||||
| 2013 | 0.63 | 0.0 | 65.36 | 96 months | ||||||||||
| 2012 | 0.42 | 0.0 | 61.12 | 96 months | ||||||||||
Expected volatilities are calculated based on the historical volatility of the Company’s stock since its listing on the public markets. Management has determined that it cannot reasonably estimate a forfeiture rate given the insufficient amount of time and activity of share option exercise and employee termination patterns. The expected life of options, representing the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding, was determined using the contractual term. The risk-free interest rate for periods within the expected life of the option is based on the interest rate for a similar time period of a U.S. Treasury note in effort on the date of the grant.
The following table provides consolidated summary information on the Company’s stock option activity for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012.
| 2013 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Weighted Average | ||||||||||||||||||||
| All Plan & Non-Plan Compensatory Options | Number of Options | Exercise | Fair Value | Remaining Life (years) | Aggregate Intrinsic Value | |||||||||||||||
| Options outstanding at December 31, 2012 | 4,076,145 | $ | 1.70 | $ | 0.56 | 3.8 | $ | - | ||||||||||||
| Granted | 1,398,501 | 0.14 | 0.25 | 5.5 | - | |||||||||||||||
| Exercised | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Forfeited or lapsed | (282,506 | ) | 2.87 | 0.77 | - | |||||||||||||||
| Options outstanding at December 31, 2013 | 5,192,140 | $ | 1.22 | $ | 0.46 | 3.7 | $ | - | ||||||||||||
| Options exercisable at December 31, 2013 | 3,431,729 | $ | 1.66 | $ | 0.58 | 2.6 | $ | - | ||||||||||||
| 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Weighted Average | ||||||||||||||||||||
| All Plan & Non-Plan Compensatory Options | Number of Options | Exercise | Fair Value | Remaining Life (years) | Aggregate Intrinsic Value | |||||||||||||||
| Options outstanding at December 31, 2012 | 3,909,300 | $ | 1.85 | $ | 0.64 | 4.2 | $ | - | ||||||||||||
| Granted | 536,429 | 1.13 | 0.15 | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Exercised | - | |||||||||||||||||||
| Forfeited or lapsed | (369,584 | ) | 2.45 | 0.82 | - | |||||||||||||||
| Options outstanding at December 31, 2013 | 4,076,145 | $ | 1.70 | $ | 0.56 | 3.0 | $ | - | ||||||||||||
| Options exercisable at December 31, 2013 | 2,965,998 | $ | 1.90 | $ | 0.65 | 3.0 | $ | - | ||||||||||||
| 42 |
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – CONTINUED
The following table summarizes the status of the Company’s non-vested options:
| All non-vested stock options as of December 31, 2013 | Shares | Fair Value | ||||||
| Options subject to future vesting at December 31, 2012 | 1,110,147 | $ | 0.40 | |||||
| Options granted | 1,398,501 | 0.25 | ||||||
| Options forfeited or lapsed | (51,201 | ) | 0.17 | |||||
| Options vested | (697,036 | ) | 0.24 | |||||
| Options subject to future vesting at December 31, 2013 | 1,760,411 | $ | 0.27 | |||||
As of December 31, 2013, there was $159,037 of unrecognized compensation related to non-vested options compared to $328,400 at December 31, 2012. The Company expects to recognize the cost over a weighted average period of 1.4 years. The total fair value of options vested was $1,985,062 and $1,945,085 for 2013 and 2012, respectively.
The compensation expense that has been recognized for options granted was $160,987 and $410,326 for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 respectively. In addition, the Company recognized non-cash compensation expense of $40,770 and $35,640 for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, for stock granted to directors in lieu of cash.
Note 7 — Earnings/Loss Per Share
Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing income available to common shareholders (the numerator) by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding (the denominator) for the period. Diluted earnings per share are computed by assuming that any dilutive convertible securities outstanding were converted, with related preferred stock dividend requirements and outstanding common shares adjusted accordingly. It also assumes that outstanding common shares were increased by shares issuable upon exercise of those stock options for which market price exceeds the exercise price, less shares which could have been purchased by us with the related proceeds. In periods of losses, diluted loss per share is computed on the same basis as basic loss per share as the inclusion of any other potential shares outstanding would be anti-dilutive.
Had the Company recorded income applicable to common shareholders for the periods ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 weighted-average number of common shares outstanding would have increased by 260,793, and 161,219 respectively, for the fiscal years, reflecting no change to dilutive securities in the calculation of diluted earnings per share.
Note 8 — Income Taxes Expense (Benefit)
A summary of the components giving rise to the income tax expense (benefit) for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 is as follows:
| 2013 | 2012 | |||||||
| Current income tax expense: | ||||||||
| Federal | $ | - | $ | - | ||||
| State | - | - | ||||||
| Foreign | - | - | ||||||
| $ | - | $ | - | |||||
| Deferred income tax provision (benefit): | ||||||||
| Federal | $ | (3,003,000 | ) | $ | (2,905,000 | ) | ||
| State | (583,000 | ) | (564,000 | ) | ||||
| Foreign | 149,000 | (51,000 | ) | |||||
| Total deferred tax | (3,438,000 | ) | (3, 520,000) | |||||
| Less increase in allowance | 3,438,000 | 3,520,000 | ||||||
| Net deferred tax | $ | - | $ | - | ||||
| Total income tax expense (recovery) | $ | - | $ | - | ||||
| Individual components giving rise to the deferred tax asset are as follows: | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||
| Future tax benefit arising from net operating loss carry forwards | $ | 24,453,000 | $ | 21,100,000 | ||||
| Future tax benefit arising from available tax credits | 1,373,000 | 1,373,000 | ||||||
| Future tax benefit arising from options/warrants issued for Services | 1,292,000 | 1, 210,000 | ||||||
| Other | 214,000 | 222,000 | ||||||
| Total future tax benefit | 27,332,000 | 23,905,000 | ||||||
| Less valuation allowance | (27,332,000 | ) | (23,905,000 | ) | ||||
| Net deferred tax | $ | - | $ | - | ||||
| The components of pretax loss are as follows: | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||
| United States | $ | (11,959,188 | ) | $ | (8,553,281 | ) | ||
| Foreign | (3,850 | ) | - | |||||
| $ | (11,963,068 | ) | $ | (8,553,281 | ) | |||
| 43 |
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – CONTINUED
The Company has net operating loss carry forwards of $56,700,000 and $2,800,000 available to reduce future income taxes in United States and Canada, respectively. The United States carry forwards expire at various dates between 2024 and 2033. The Canadian loss carry forwards expire at various dates between 2013 and 2028. The Company also has generated Canadian tax credits related to research and development activities. The credit, amounting to $734,000 U.S. Dollars, is available to offset future taxable income in Canada and expires at various dates between 2024 and 2026. The Company has adopted FASB ASC 740, which provides for the recognition of a deferred tax asset based upon the value certain items will have on future income taxes and management's estimate of the probability of the realization of these tax benefits. The Company has determined it more likely than not that these timing differences will not materialize and have provided a valuation allowance against the entire net deferred tax asset. The utilization of NOL and tax credit carry forwards from Tamboril prior to the reorganization may be subject to a substantial annual limitation due to the ownership change limitations provided by the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended and similar state provisions. Accordingly, these amounts have not been included in the gross deferred tax asset number above. In addition, due to equity transactions that have occurred subsequent to the reorganization with Tamboril, the utilization of NOL carry forwards may be subject to further change in control limitations that generally restricts the utilization of the NOL per year.
The reconciliation of the United States statutory federal income rate and the effective income tax rate in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 is as follows:
| 2013 | 2012 | |||||||
| Statutory U.S. federal income tax rate | (34.0 | %) | (34.0 | %) | ||||
| Prior period adjustments | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | ||||
| State taxes, net | (4.9 | %) | (6.6 | %) | ||||
| Foreign currency fluctuation | 1.3 | % | (0.6 | %) | ||||
| U.S. tax credits | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | ||||
| Revaluation of Derivatives | (5.6 | %) | (0.1 | %) | ||||
| Debt Discount Amortization | 14.5 | % | 0.1 | % | ||||
| Change in valuation allowance | 28.7 | % | 41.1 | % | ||||
| Effective income tax rate | 0.0 | % | 0.00 | % | ||||
The Company adopted the provisions of FASB ASC 740-10 “Income Taxes” on January 1, 2008. As the result of the assessment, the Company recognized no material adjustments to unrecognized tax benefits. At the adoption date of January 1, 2008 and as of
December 31, 2013, the Company has no unrecognized tax benefits. By statute, tax years ending December 31, 2008 through 2013 remain open to examination by the major taxing jurisdictions to which the Company is subject.
Note 9 — Related Party Transactions
None.
| 44 |
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – CONTINUED
Note 10 — Supplemental Cash Flow Information
Cash payments for interest during the years ended December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 were $19,405 and $17,595, respectively. There were no payments of income taxes during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012
Note 11 — Commitments and Contingencies and Significant Contracts
Facilities: On March 28, 2010, we renewed our lease for existing space at our manufacturing plant, located at 3601 Clover Lane, in New Castle, Pennsylvania. The salient terms of the Lease are as follows:
| · | The term commenced on April 3, 2010 with an initial term of three years. |
| · | The renewal lease may be extended for two successive five-year renewal options with future rent to be negotiated at a commercially reasonable rate. |
| · | The battery manufacturing facility includes 70,438 square feet of floor space, including 7,859 square feet of office, locker, lab and lunch area, 46,931 square feet of manufacturing space, 1,488 square feet of dedicated lab space, 9,200 square feet of storage buildings and 5,000 square feet of basement area. |
| · | The rental amount for the initial term is $17,200 per month, which is fixed through 2013. In addition to the monthly rental, we are obligated to pay all required maintenance costs, taxes and special assessments, maintain public liability insurance and maintain fire and casualty insurance for an amount equal to 100% of the replacement value of the leased premises. |
| · | On May 26, 2011 we executed an addendum to the existing lease agreement which resulted in the lease of an additional 2,160 square feet of additional space for $500.00 per month. There were no other changes to the existing lease. |
| · | With the execution of the addendum we now lease 72,598 square feet for a monthly rent of $17,200. |
On November 4, 2010, the Company entered into a Commercial Lease (“Lease”) with Becan Development, LLC (“Lessor”) to lease a 45,000 square foot building, located at 209 Green Ridge Road in New Castle PA, (the “Property”). The salient terms of the Lease are as follows:
| · | The Lease term commenced on January 1, 2011 and the term expires on December 31, 2015. |
| · | The Lease may be extended for two 5-year terms, by giving notice not less than 30 nor more than 120 days before the expiration of the initial term or first renewal term (as applicable). The renewal leases shall be on terms substantially similar to the terms of the initial Lease except for any adjustment to rent, if warranted, as mutually agreed upon by Lessor and the Company. |
| · | The rental amount for the initial term is $19,297 per month and is on a “triple net” basis. |
| · | If the Company is able to obtain sufficient funding from either the federal or state government or agencies, and it enters into a binding agreement to purchase the Property, the Lease shall be immediately terminated and Lessor shall credit the most recent 6 months of actual rental payments made to Lessor against the purchase price of the Property |
| · | The Company also has a right of first refusal to purchase the property within 30 days of receipt of notice of a third party offer from Lessor upon substantially the same terms as those offered by the third party. |
| · | The Lease contains market terms on standard provisions such as defaults and maintenance. |
| 45 |
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – CONTINUED
Employment Agreements: The Company has entered into executive employment agreements with Thomas Granville, Charles R. Trego, Phillip S. Baker, and Vani K. Dantam. These agreements generally require each executive to devote substantially all of his business time to the Company’s affairs, establish standards of conduct, prohibit competition with our company during their term, affirm our rights respecting the ownership and disclosure of patents, trade secrets and other confidential information, provide for the acts and events that would give rise to termination of such agreements and provide express remedies for a breach of the agreement. Each of the executives is allowed to participate in our standard employee benefit programs, including medical/hospitalization insurance and group life insurance, as in effect from time to time. Each of the covered executives will generally receive an automobile allowance, reimbursement for all reasonable business expenses incurred by him on behalf of the Company in the performance of his duties, and a severance package that guarantees continued remuneration equal to the executives base salary for a total of 23 months so long as the Company elects to enforce the provisions of the Non-Competition Agreement, should the executive be unable to find employment or accepts employment at a reduced rate of pay due solely to the Non-Competition Agreement. The provisions of the individual agreements are set forth in the following table:
| Name | Position | Date | Term | Salary | Options | Price | Vesting | Stock | ||||||||||||||||
| Thomas Granville (1) | CEO | 6/29/13 | 3-year | $ | 380,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Charles R. Trego (2) | CFO (resigned August 2, 2013) | 4/01/13 | 3-year | $ | 225,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Stephen Graham (3) | CFO | 10/21/2013 | 3-year | $ | 250,000 | 900,000 | $ | 0.15 | Monthly | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Philip S. Baker (4) | COO | 4/01/13 | 3-year | $ | 199,800 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Vani K. Dantam (5) | Sr. VP | 1/23/12 | 3-year | $ | 225,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
| 1. | Thomas Granville. On April 1, 2013, the Company renewed the Executive Employment Agreement with Thomas Granville as Chief Executive Officer. Pursuant to this agreement, Mr. Granville receives an annual salary of $380,000, an annual stipend of $38,000 and an annual car allowance of $9,000 for the period commencing April 1, 2013, and terminating March 31, 2016. Mr. Granville’s base salary is subject to annual review, and he is eligible for an annual bonus as determined by the compensation committee. Any such salary adjustment or bonus amount is on the basis of Mr. Granville’s and the Company’s performance. In addition, on June 29, 2010, Mr. Granville was granted a signing bonus of $270,000 and was paid on July 9, 2010. The Company also granted Mr. Granville an option to purchase 360,000 shares of our common stock at a price of $1.50 per share at a vesting rate of 10,000 shares per month through the term of the agreement. Mr. Granville is eligible to participate in any executive compensation plans adopted by the shareholders of the Company and the Company's standard employee benefit programs. |
| 2. | Charles R. Trego. On April 1, 2013, the Company entered into an Executive Employment Agreement with Charles R. Trego as Chief Financial Officer. Under the terms of his employment agreement, which had a term of three years, Mr. Trego was to receive an annual salary of $225,000, which was subject to review annually, an annual stipend of $22,500, an annual car allowance of $9,000, and bonus as determined by the compensation committee. On April 1, 2010, Mr. Trego received a 5-year option to purchase 265,000 shares of our common stock at a price of $1.50 per share. 27,000 options vested April 1, 2010 and, beginning in June 2010, 7,000 options vested monthly over a 34 month period. Mr. Trego resigned from the Company effective August 2, 2013. |
| 3. | Stephen Graham. On October 9, 2013 the Company entered into an Executive Employment Agreement with Stephen Graham as the new Chief Financial Officer effective October 21, 2013. Mr. Graham receives an annual salary of $250,000, which is subject to annual review, and an annual car allowance of $9,000, an annual stipend of $25,000and bonuses as determined by the compensation committee. Mr. Graham was granted a 5-year option to purchase 900,000 shares of common stock at a price of $0.15 per share, 180,000 options vested immediately and thereafter 20,000 options shall vest on the last day of each consecutive calendar month, commencing on October 31, 2013 and ending on September 30, 2016. |
| 4. | Philip S. Baker. On April 1, 2013, the Company renewed the Executive Employment Agreement with Philip S. Baker as Chief Operating Officer. Under the terms of his employment agreement, which has a term of three years, Mr. Baker receives an annual salary of $199,800, which is subject to review annually, an annual stipend of $19,980, an annual bonus as determined by the compensation committee , and an annual car allowance of $6,000. On April 1, 2010, Mr. Baker was granted a 5-year option to purchase 230,000 shares of our common stock at a price of $1.50 per share. 26,000 options vested on April 1, 2010 and, beginning in June, 2010, 6,000 options vested monthly through the remaining 34 months of this contract. |
| 5. | Vani K. Dantam. On April 1, 2013, The Company entered into a new Executive Employment Agreement with Vani Dantam as Senior Vice President Business Development, Sales & Marketing. Under the terms of this agreement, which has a term of three years, Mr. Dantam receives an annual salary of $225,000 , which is subject to review on an annual basis, an annual stipend of $22,500, is eligible for an annual bonus as determined by the compensation committee and an annual car allowance of $6,000. On January 1, 2012, Mr. Dantam received a $20,000 sign-on bonus , , and a 5- year option to purchase to purchase 150,000 shares of our common stock at a price of $1.50 per share , 15,020 options vested on January 1, 2012, and, beginning March 2012, 3,970 options vest monthly. |
We have no retirement plans or other similar arrangements for any directors, executive officers or employees, other than a noncontributory 401(k) plan.
| 46 |
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – CONTINUED
Purchase Orders
On May 11, 2010, the Company was awarded federal contract number N00014-10-C-0094. Under the terms of the agreement, Axion shall furnish personnel and facilities to conduct the research effort for the development of new lightweight, high-powered batteries for use in vehicles operated by the U.S. Marine Corps. This cost-plus-fixed-fee completion contract requires scientific or technical reports to be delivered, inspected and accepted prior to reimbursement. Costs incurred during the performance period, will be reimbursed quarterly. The final report was delivered in July, 2011. The contract, provided $1,004,747 to us in funding for this project, and is subject to a financial audit upon contract completion which we anticipate will occur in 2013.
Selling price was determined by periodic spending using the hourly labor, overhead, and G&A rates submitted with the proposal. The rates are subject to adjustment at the end of contract, and secured by the unpaid fixed fee. Revenue based on the proportionate performance of the work performed was recognized from inception to completion when collection of the reimbursement was reasonably assured. Recognition of the fixed fee was postponed to contract completion. Fixed fee billings were recorded under deferred revenue. The contract contributed no service revenue in either year 2013 or 2012.
Note 12 — Subsequent events
Stephen Graham, has notified us of his resignation as our Chief Financial Officer, effective as of April 1, 2014.
| Item 9 | Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure. |
None.
Item 9A Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of December 31, 2013 (“Evaluation Date”), the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K, management performed, with the participation of our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer, an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the report we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management including our Principal Executive Officer and our Principal Accounting Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. Based upon the evaluation, our Principal Executive Officer and our Principal Accounting Officer concluded that, as of the Evaluation Date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projection of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods is subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management has conducted, with the participation of our Principal Executive Officer and our Principal Accounting Officer, an assessment, including testing of the effectiveness, of our internal control over financial reporting as of Evaluation Date. Management’s assessment of internal control over financial reporting was conducted using the criteria in Internal Control over Financial Reporting - Guidance for Smaller Public Companies issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. In connection with our management’s assessment of our internal control over financial reporting as required under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we have not identified any material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting as of Evaluation Date. We have thus concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of the Evaluation Date.
During the three months ended December 31, 2013, there were no significant changes in our internal control over financial reporting. This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company's registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management's report was not subject to attestation by the Company's registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Commission that permit the Company to provide only management's report in this annual report.
| 47 |
PART III
Item 10 Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Information with respect to our executive officers and directors and disclosure of delinquent Form 3, 4 or 5 filers required by this item will be contained in the Definitive Proxy Statement relating to our 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders; said information is incorporated herein by reference.
Code of business conduct and ethics
Our Board of Directors has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, which has been distributed to all directors, officers, and employees and is given to new employees at the time of hire. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics contains a number of provisions that apply principally to our President, Chief Financial Officer and other key accounting and financial personnel. A copy of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics can be found under the “Investor Information” section of our website at www.axionpower.com. We intend to disclose any amendments or waivers of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics on our website.
Item 11 Executive Compensation
A description of the compensation of our executive officers will be contained in the Definitive Proxy Statement relating to our 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders; said information is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 12 Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
A description of the security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management will be contained in the Definitive Proxy Statement relating to our 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders; said information is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 13 Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
A description of certain relationships and related transactions with management will be contained in the Definitive Proxy Statement relating to our 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders; said information is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 14 Principal Accounting Fees and Services
Fees of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
A description of principal accounting fees and services will be contained in the Definitive Proxy Statement relating to our 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders; said information is incorporated herein by reference.
| 48 |
PART IV
Item 15 Exhibits
| 2.1 | Reorganization Agreement (without exhibits) between Tamboril Cigar Company, Axion Power Corporation and certain stockholders of Axion Power Corporation dated December 31, 2003. | (1) | ||
| 2.2 | First Addendum to the Reorganization Agreement between Tamboril Cigar Company, Axion Power Corporation and certain stockholders of Axion Power Corporation dated January 9, 2004. | (1) | ||
| 3.1 | Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Tamboril Cigar Company dated February 13, 2001. | (2) | ||
| 3.3 | Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of Tamboril Cigar Company dated June 4, 2004. | (3) | ||
| 3.4 | Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of Axion Power International, Inc. dated June 4, 2004. | (3) | ||
| 3.5 | Amended By-laws of Axion Power International, Inc. dated June 4, 2004. (3) | |||
| 3.6 | Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of Axion Power International, Inc., dated June 14, 2010. | (25) | ||
|
3.7 4.1 |
Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of Axion Power International, Inc., dated July 22, 2011. Specimen Certificate for shares of Company’s $0.00001 par value common stock. |
(9) |
||
| 4.2 | Trust Agreement for the Benefit of the Shareholders of Mega-C Power Corporation dated December 31, 2003. | (1) | ||
| 4.3 | Succession Agreement Pursuant to the Provisions of the Trust Agreement for the Benefit of the Shareholders of Mega-C Power Corporation dated March 25, 2004. | (4) | ||
| 4.4 | Form of Warrant Agreement for 1,796,300 capital warrants. | (9) | ||
| 4.5 | Form of Warrant Agreement for 667,000 Series I investor warrants. | (9) | ||
| 4.6 | Form of Warrant Agreement for 350,000 Series II investor warrants. | (9) | ||
| 4.7 | Form of Warrant Agreement for 313,100 Series III investor warrants. | (9) | ||
| 4.8 | Form of 8% Cumulative Convertible Senior Preferred Stock Certificate | (D) | ||
| 4.9 | First Amended and Restated Trust Agreement for the Benefit of the Shareholders of Mega-C Power Corporation dated February 28, 2005. | (11) | ||
| 4.10 | Second Amendment and Restated Trust Agreement for the Benefit of the Shareholders of Mega-C Power Corporation dated November 21, 2006. | (19) | ||
| 4.11 | Certificate of Powers, Designations, Preferences and Rights of the 8% Convertible Senior Preferred Stock of Axion Power International, Inc. dated March 17, 2005. | (12) | ||
| 4.12 | Certificate of Powers, Designations, Preferences and Rights of the Series-A Convertible Preferred Stock, Par Value $0.0001 Per Share, of Axion Power International, Inc. dated October 23, 2006. | (13) | ||
| 4.13 | Amended Certificate of Powers, Designations, Preferences and Rights of the Series-A Convertible Preferred Stock, Par Value $0.0001 Per Share, of Axion Power International, Inc. dated October 26, 2006. | (13) | ||
| 4.14 | Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Powers, Designations, Preferences and Rights of the Series-A Convertible Preferred Stock, Par Value $.0001 Per Share, of Axion Power International, Inc. dated February 24, 2010. | |||
| 9.1 | Agreement respecting the voting of certain shares beneficially owned by the Trust for the Benefit of the Shareholders of Mega-C Power Corporation. | Included in Exhibit 4.2 | ||
| 10.1 | Development and License Agreement between Axion Power Corporation and C and T Co. Incorporated dated November 15, 2003. | (1) | ||
| 10.2 | Letter Amendment to Development and License Agreement between Axion Power Corporation and C and T Co. Incorporated dated November 17, 2003. | (1) | ||
| 10.3 | Tamboril Cigar Co. Incentive Stock Plan dated January 8, 2004. | (A) | ||
| 10.4 | Tamboril Cigar co. Outside Directors Stock Option Plan dated February 2, 2004. | (A) | ||
| 10.5 | Stock Purchase & Investment Representation Letter among John L. Petersen, Sally A. Fonner and C and T Co. Incorporated dated January 9, 2004. | (1) | ||
| 10.6 | Letter Amendment to Development and License Agreement between Axion Power Corporation and C and T Co. Incorporated dated January 9, 2004. | (1) | ||
| 10.7 | First Amendment to Development and License Agreement between Axion Power Corporation and C and T Co. Incorporated dated as of January 9, 2004. | (5) | ||
| 10.8 | Definitive Incentive Stock Plan of Axion Power International, Inc. dated June 4, 2004. | (3) | ||
| 10.9 | Definitive Outside Directors’ Stock Option Plan of Axion Power International, Inc. dated June 4, 2004. | (3) | ||
| 10.10 | Executive Employment Agreement of Charles Mazzacato. | (9) | ||
| 10.11 | Executive Employment Agreement of Peter Roston. | (9) | ||
| 10.12 | Amended Retainer Agreement between the law firm of Fefer, Petersen & Cie dated March 31, 2005. | (C) | ||
| 10.13 | Retainer Agreement between the law firm of Fefer, Petersen & Cie and Tamboril Cigar Company dated January 2, 2004. | (10) | ||
| 10.14 | Bankruptcy Settlement Agreement Between Axion Power International, Inc. and Mega-C Power Corporation dated December, 2005. | (E) | ||
| 10.15 | Second Amendment to Development and License Agreement between Axion Power International, Inc. and C and T Co. Incorporated dated as of March 18, 2005. | (12) | ||
| 10.16 | Executive Employment Agreement of Thomas Granville dated June 23, 2008. | (20) | ||
| 49 |
| 10.17 | Loan agreement between Axion Battery Products, Inc. as borrower, Axion Power International, Inc. as accommodation party and Robert Averill as lender respecting a $1,000,000 purchase money and working capital loan dated January 31, 2006. | (14) |
| 10.18 | Security agreement between Axion Battery Products, Inc. as debtor and Robert Averill as secured party dated January 31, 2006. | (14) |
| 10.19 | Security agreement between Axion Power International, Inc. as debtor and Robert Averill as secured party dated January 31, 2006. | (14) |
| 10.20 | Promissory Note between Axion Battery Products, Inc. as maker and Robert Averill as payee dated February 14, 2006. | (14) |
| 10.21 | Form of Warrant Agreement between Axion Power International, Inc. and Robert Averill. | (14) |
| 10.22 | Commercial Lease Agreement between Axion Battery Products, Inc. as lessee and Steven F. Hoye and Steven C. Warner as lessors dated February 14, 2006. | (14) |
| 10.23 | Asset Purchase Agreement dated between Axion Battery Products, Inc. as buyer and National City Bank of Pennsylvania as seller February 10, 2006. | (14) |
| 10.24 | Escrow Agreement between Axion Battery Products, Inc. and National City Bank of Pennsylvania as parties in interest and William E. Kelleher, Jr. and James D. Newell as escrow agents dated February 14, 2006. | (14) |
| 10.25 | Executive Employment Agreement of Edward Buiel dated June 23, 2008. | (21) |
| 10.26 | Consulting Agreement, by and between Axion Power International, Inc. and Andrew Carr Conway, Jr. dated as of September 27, 2007. | (16) |
| 10.27 | Amendment No. 1 to Consulting Agreement by and between Axion Power International, Inc. and Andrew Carr Conway, Jr. dated as of October 31, 2007. | (16) |
| 10.28 | Securities Purchase Agreement by and between Axion Power International, Inc. and Quercus Trust dated as of January 14, 2008. | (17) |
| 10.29 | Common Stock Purchase Warrant executed by Axion Power International, Inc. dated January 14, 2008. | (17) |
| 10.30 | Executive Employment Agreement of Donald T. Hillier dated June 18, 2008. | (19) |
| 10.31 | Amendment to Warrants and Securities Purchase Agreement by and between Axion Power International, Inc. and Quercus Trust dated as of September 22, 2009. | (22) |
| 10.32 | Securities Purchase Agreement by and between Axion Power International, Inc. and the Investors named therein dated as of December 18, 2009. | (23) |
| 10.33 | Registration Rights Agreement, executed by Axion Power International Inc. and the Investors named therein. | (23) |
| 10.34 | Amendment No. 2 to Securities Purchase by and between Axion Power International, Inc. and Quercus Trust Agreement dated as of January 14, 2008. | (23) |
| 10.35 | Lock-Up Agreement executed by Quercus Trust and David Gelbaum and Monica Chavez Gelbaum. | (23) |
| 10.36 | Lease Agreement by and between Steven F. Hoye and Steven C. Warner, Lessor, and Axion Power Battery Manufacturing, Inc., Lessee dated March 28, 2010. | (6) |
| 10.37 | Executive Employment Agreement of Charles R. Trego dated April 1, 2010. | (24) |
| 10.38 | Executive Employment Agreement of Phillip S. Baker dated April 1, 2010. | (24) |
| 10.39 | Executive Employment Agreement of Thomas Granville dated June 29, 2010. | (26) |
| 10.40 | Amendment No. 3 to Securities Purchase Agreement by and between Axion Power International, Inc. and the Quercus Trust dated September 30, 2010. | (27) |
| 10.42 | Form of Subscription Agreement | (31) | ||
| 10.43 | Placement Agency Agreement, dated January 31, 2012 | (31) | ||
| 10.44 | Securities Purchase Agreement, dated May 7, 2013, between Axion Power International, Inc. and the Investors | (32) | ||
| 10.45 | Form of Note | (32) | ||
| 10.46 | Form of Warrant | (32) | ||
| 10.47 | Registration Rights Agreement, dated May 8, 2013, between Axion Power International, Inc. and the Investors | (32) | ||
| 10.48 | Subordinated Note Purchase Agreement, dated May 7, 2013, between Axion Power International, Inc. and the Subordinated Investors | (32) | ||
| 10.49 | Form of Subordinated Note | (32) | ||
| 10.50 | Form of Subordinated Note Warrant | (32) | ||
| 10.51 | Subordination Agreement, dated May 8, 2013, by and among Axion Power International, Inc., the Investors and the Subordinated Investors | (32) | ||
| 10.52 | Executive Employment Agreement of Thomas Granville, effective April 1, 2013 | (33) | ||
| 10.53 | Executive Employment Agreement of Charles Trego, effective April 1, 2013 | (33) | ||
| 10.54 | Executive Employment Agreement of Phillip Baker, effective April 1, 2013 | (33) | ||
| 10.55 | Executive Employment Agreement of Vani Dantam, effective April 1, 2013 | (33) | ||
| 10.56 | Executive Employment Agreement of Stephen Graham, effective October 21, 2013 | (34) | ||
| 10.57 | Form of Senior Note Amendment | (35) | ||
| 14.1 | Code of Business Conduct and Ethics | (6) |
| 50 |
| (1) | Incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 15, 2004. |
| (2) | Incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 5, 2003. |
| (3) | Incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 7, 2004. |
| (4) | Incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 13, 2004. |
| (5) | Incorporated by reference from our Form S-3 registration statement dated May 20, 2004. |
| (6) | Incorporated by reference from our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB dated March 30, 2004 |
| (7) | Incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 13, 2003. |
| (8) | Incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 16, 2004. |
| (9) | Incorporated by reference from our Form S-1 registration statement dated September 2, 2004. |
| (10) | Incorporated by reference from our Form S-1 registration statement dated December 17, 2004. |
| (11) | Incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 28, 2005. |
| (12) | Incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 21, 2005. |
| (13) | Incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 8, 2006. |
| (14) | Incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 16, 2006. |
| (15) | Incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 3, 2007. |
| (16) | Incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 6, 2007. |
| (17) | Incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 17, 2008. |
| (18) | Incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 31, 2008. |
| (19) | Incorporated by reference from our Registration Statement on Form S-1 dated July 3, 2008. |
| (20) | Incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 27, 2008. |
| (21) | Incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 2, 2008. |
| (22) | Incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 22, 2009. |
| (23) | Incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 18, 2009. |
| (24) | Incorporated by reference from our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 filed on March 30, 2010 |
| (25) | Intentionally omitted. |
| (26) | Incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on April 6, 2010. |
| (27) | Incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 6, 2010. |
| (28) | Incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 4, 2010. |
| (29) | Incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 10, 2010. |
| (30) | Incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 22, 2011. |
| (31) | Incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 31, 2012. |
| (32) | Incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 8, 2013 |
| (33) | Incorporated by reference from our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q dated May 15, 2013 |
| (34) | Incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K, dated October 15, 2013 |
| (35) | Incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 3, 2014. |
| (A) | Incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K/A dated February 2, 2004. |
| (B) | Incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 4, 2005. |
| (C) | Incorporated by reference from our Registration Statement on Form SB-2 dated April 16, 2005. |
| (D) | Incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 13, 2005. |
|
31.1 32.2 32.1 |
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) Statement of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code. |
| 32.2 | Statement of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code. |
| 51 |
The following materials from the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, formatted in eXtensible Business Reporting Language: (i) the Condensed Balance Sheets, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (v) the Notes to Condensed Financial Statements, as follows:
| 101.INS | XBRL Instance Document |
| 101.SCH | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema |
| 101.CAL | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase |
| 101.DEF | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase |
| 101.LAB | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase |
| 101.PRE | XBRL Extension Presentation Linkbase |
Financial Statements
Consolidated Financial Statements for Axion Power International, Inc. for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively as set forth in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
| 52 |
SIGNATURES
In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| AXION POWER INTERNATIONAL, INC. | |
| By: | /s/ Thomas Granville |
| Thomas Granville, Principal Executive Officer and Director | |
| Dated: March 31, 2014 | |
| AXION POWER INTERNATIONAL, INC. | |
| By: | /s/ Stephen Graham |
| Stephen Graham, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer | |
| Dated: March 31, 2014 | |
In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
| Signature | Title | Date | ||
| /s/ Thomas Granville | ||||
| Thomas Granville | Director | March 31, 2014 | ||
| /s/ Michael Kishinevsky | ||||
| Michael Kishinevsky | Director | March 31, 2014 | ||
| /s/ Howard K. Schmidt | ||||
| Howard K. Schmidt | Director | March 31, 2014 | ||
| /s/ Charles Trego | ||||
| Charles Trego | Director | March 31, 2014 | ||
| /s/ D. Walker Wainwright | ||||
| D. Walker Wainwright | Director | March 31, 2014 | ||
| /s/ David DiGiacinto | ||||
| David DiGiacinto | Director | March 31, 2014 |
| 53 |