Form 10-Q

 


 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 


 

FORM 10-Q

 

(Mark One)

x   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the quarterly period (16 weeks) ended June 14, 2003.

 

¨   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from                     to                    .

 

Commission file number 1-5418

 


 

SUPERVALU INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its Charter)

 

 

DELAWARE   41-0617000
(State or other jurisdiction of   (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)   identification No.)
     
11840 VALLEY VIEW ROAD,    
EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA   55344
(Address of principal executive offices)   (Zip Code)

 

(952) 828-4000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

N/A

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

 


 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes  x  No  ¨

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes x No ¨

 

The number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of Common Stock as of July 24, 2003 is as follows:

 

 

Title of Each Class


  

Shares Outstanding


Common Shares

   133,873,530

 

 


 

1


PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

ITEM 1.   FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

SUPERVALU INC. and Subsidiaries

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS

 

(In thousands, except percent and per share data)

 

     First Quarter (16 weeks) Ended

 
     June 14, 2003

   % of sales

    June 15, 2002

   % of sales

 

Net sales

   $ 5,836,287    100.0 %   $ 5,654,424    100.0 %

Costs and expenses

                          

Cost of sales

     5,035,541    86.3       4,897,468    86.6  

Selling and administrative expenses

     637,745    10.9       582,682    10.3  

Restructure and other charges

     1,171    —         —      —    
    

  

 

  

Operating earnings

     161,830    2.8       174,274    3.1  

Interest

                          

Interest expense

     49,575    0.8       58,052    1.0  

Interest income

     5,147    0.1       6,217    0.1  
    

  

 

  

Interest expense, net

     44,428    0.7       51,835    0.9  
    

  

 

  

Earnings before income taxes

     117,402    2.1       122,439    2.2  

Provision for income taxes

                          

Current

     34,159    0.6       39,718    0.7  

Deferred

     9,573    0.2       5,566    0.1  
    

  

 

  

Income tax expense

     43,732    0.8       45,284    0.8  
    

  

 

  

Net earnings

   $ 73,670    1.3 %   $ 77,155    1.4 %
    

  

 

  

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding

                          

Diluted

     134,118            136,139       

Basic

     133,719            133,812       

Net earnings per common share—diluted

   $ 0.55          $ 0.57       

Net earnings per common share—basic

   $ 0.55          $ 0.58       

Dividends per common share

   $ .1425          $ .1400       

 

All data subject to year-end audit.

 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

2


SUPERVALU INC. and Subsidiaries

 

CONSOLIDATED COMPOSITION OF NET SALES AND OPERATING EARNINGS

 

(In thousands, except percent data)

 

     First Quarter (16 weeks) Ended

 
     June 14, 2003

    June 15, 2002

 

Net sales

                

Retail food

   $ 2,956,511     $ 2,812,221  

% of total

     50.7 %     49.7 %

Food distribution

     2,879,776       2,842,203  

% of total

     49.3       50.3 %
    


 


Total net sales

   $ 5,836,287     $ 5,654,424  
       100.0 %     100.0 %
    


 


Operating earnings

                

Retail food operating earnings

   $ 123,624     $ 129,145  

% of sales

     4.2 %     4.6 %

Food distribution operating earnings

     58,174       57,173  

% of sales

     2.0 %     2.0 %
    


 


Subtotal

     181,798       186,318  

% of sales

     3.1 %     3.3 %
    


 


General corporate expenses

     (18,797 )     (12,044 )

Restructure and other charges

     (1,171 )     —    
    


 


Total operating earnings

     161,830       174,274  

% of sales

     2.8 %     3.1 %

Interest expense

     (49,575 )     (58,052 )

Interest income

     5,147       6,217  
    


 


Earnings before income taxes

     117,402       122,439  

Provision for income taxes

     (43,732 )     (45,284 )
    


 


Net earnings

   $ 73,670     $ 77,155  
    


 


 

The company’s business is classified by management into two reportable segments: Retail food and food distribution. Retail food operations include three retail formats: extreme value stores, regional price superstores and regional supermarkets. The retail formats include results of food stores owned and results of sales to extreme value stores licensed by the company. Food distribution operations include results of sales to affiliated food stores, mass merchants and other customers, and other logistics arrangements. Management utilizes more than one measurement and multiple views of data to assess segment performance and to allocate resources to the segments. However, the dominant measurements are consistent with the consolidated financial statements. Reportable segment operating earnings were computed as total revenue less associated operating expenses.

 

All data subject to year-end audit.

 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

3


SUPERVALU INC. and Subsidiaries

 

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

 

(In thousands)

 

    

June 14,

2003


   February 22,
2003


Assets

             

Current Assets

             

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 71,777    $ 29,188

Receivables, net ($0 as of June 14, 2003 and $264,392 as of February 22, 2003 pledged as collateral)

     493,344      477,429

Inventories, net

     1,109,139      1,049,283

Other current assets

     94,004      91,466
    

  

Total current assets

     1,768,264      1,647,366

Long-term notes receivable, net

     131,989      126,435

Property, plant and equipment, net

     2,180,869      2,220,850

Goodwill

     1,581,764      1,576,584

Other assets

     344,705      325,010
    

  

Total assets

   $ 6,007,591    $ 5,896,245
    

  

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

             

Current Liabilities

             

Notes payable

   $ —      $ 80,000

Accounts payable

     1,166,138      1,081,734

Current debt and obligations under capital leases

     64,063      61,580

Other current liabilities

     340,993      301,993
    

  

Total current liabilities

     1,571,194      1,525,307

Long-term debt and obligations under capital leases

     2,018,390      2,019,658

Other liabilities and deferred income taxes

     352,473      342,040

Commitments and contingencies

             

Total stockholders’ equity

     2,065,534      2,009,240
    

  

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

   $ 6,007,591    $ 5,896,245
    

  

 

All data subject to year-end audit.

 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

4


SUPERVALU INC. and Subsidiaries

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

(In thousands, except per share data)

 

     Common Stock

  

Capital in

Excess of

Par Value


    Treasury Stock

    

Accumulated

Other

Comprehensive

Losses


    

Retained

Earnings


     Total

 
     Shares

   Amount

     Shares

     Amount

          

BALANCES AT FEBRUARY 23, 2002

   150,670    $ 150,670    $ 121,444     (17,781 )    $ (335,885 )    $ (7,075 )    $ 1,969,984      $ 1,899,138  

Comprehensive income:

                                                              

Net earnings

          —              —          —          —          257,042        257,042  

Amortization of loss on derivative financial instrument, net of deferred taxes of $0.2 million

   —        —        —       —          —          340        —          340  

Minimum pension liability, net of deferred taxes of $47.1 million

   —        —        —       —          —          (72,328 )      —          (72,328 )
                                                          


Total comprehensive income

                                                           185,054  

Sales of common stock under option plans

   —        —        (9,196 )   2,155        47,618        —          —          38,422  

Cash dividends declared on common stock—$.5675 per share

   —        —        —       —          —          —          (76,094 )      (76,094 )

Compensation under employee incentive plans

   —        —        1,780     152        3,099        —          —          4,879  

Purchase of shares for treasury

   —        —        —       (1,508 )      (42,159 )      —          —          (42,159 )
    
  

  


 

  


  


  


  


BALANCES AT FEBRUARY 22, 2003

   150,670      150,670      114,028     (16,982 )      (327,327 )      (79,063 )      2,150,932        2,009,240  

Comprehensive income:

                                                              

Net earnings

   —        —        —       —          —          —          73,670        73,670  

Amortization of loss on derivative financial instrument, net of deferred taxes of $0.068 million

   —        —        —       —          —          105        —          105  
                                                          


Total comprehensive income

   —        —        —       —          —          —          —          73,775  

Sales of common stock under option plans

                 (2,475 )   107        3,889                          1,414  

Cash dividends declared on common stock—$.1425 per share

   —        —        —       —          —          —          (19,086 )      (19,086 )

Compensation under employee incentive plans

                 (634 )   102        2,407        —          —          1,773  

Purchase of shares for treasury

   —        —        —       (93 )      (1,582 )      —          —          (1,582 )
    
  

  


 

  


  


  


  


BALANCES AT JUNE 14, 2003

   150,670    $ 150,670    $ 110,919     (16,866 )    $ (322,613 )    $ (78,958 )    $ 2,205,516      $ 2,065,534  
    
  

  


 

  


  


  


  


 

All data subject to year-end audit.

 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

5


SUPERVALU INC. and Subsidiaries

 

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 

(In thousands)

 

    

Year-to-date

(16 weeks ended)


 
    

June 14,

2003


   

June 15,

2002


 

Net cash provided by operating activities

   $ 214,939     $ 221,547  
    


 


Cash flows from investing activities

                

Additions to long-term notes receivable

     (9,000 )     (6,154 )

Proceeds received on long-term notes receivable

     4,070       6,150  

Proceeds from sale of assets

     11,340       12,441  

Purchases of property, plant and equipment

     (62,724 )     (137,786 )
    


 


Net cash used in investing activities

     (56,314 )     (125,349 )
    


 


Cash flows from financing activities

                

Net reduction of notes payable

     (80,000 )     (24,000 )

Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt

     —         296,535  

Repayment of long-term debt

     (5,443 )     (4,034 )

Reduction of obligations under capital leases

     (10,826 )     (9,290 )

Dividends paid

     (19,111 )     (18,724 )

Net proceeds from the sale of common stock under option plans

     926       29,960  

Payment for purchase of treasury shares

     (1,582 )     (31,968 )
    


 


Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities

     (116,036 )     238,479  
    


 


Net increase in cash and cash equivalents

     42,589       334,677  

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

     29,188       12,171  
    


 


Cash and cash equivalents at the end of period

   $ 71,777     $ 346,848  
    


 


Supplemental Information:

                

Pretax LIFO expense

   $ 783     $ 975  

Pretax depreciation and amortization

   $ 88,840     $ 86,907  

 

All data subject to year-end audit.

 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

6


SUPERVALU INC. and Subsidiaries

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

GENERAL

 

Accounting Policies:

 

The summary of significant accounting policies is included in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements set forth in the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended February 22, 2003 (fiscal 2003). References to the company refer to SUPERVALU INC. and Subsidiaries.

 

Fiscal Year:

 

The company’s fiscal year ends on the last Saturday in February. The company’s first quarter consists of 16 weeks, the second and third quarters each consist of 12 weeks and the fourth quarter consists of 13 weeks for a total of 53 weeks for fiscal 2004. Fiscal 2003 comprised 52 weeks with the first quarter consisting of 16 weeks, while the second, third and fourth quarters each consisted of 12 weeks.

 

Statement of Registrant:

 

The data presented herein is unaudited but, in the opinion of management, includes all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of the condensed consolidated financial position of the company and its subsidiaries at June 14, 2003 and June 15, 2002, and the results of the company’s operations and condensed consolidated cash flows for the periods then ended. These interim results are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full fiscal year.

 

Use of Estimates:

 

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

 

Facilitative Services:

 

The company provides certain facilitative services between its independent retailers and vendors related to products typically known as direct store delivery products. These services include sourcing, invoicing and payment services. The net gross margin associated with such facilitative services is reflected as a component of net sales.

 

    

First Quarter

(16 weeks) Ended


     June 14, 2003

   June 15, 2002

     (In thousands)

Amounts invoiced to independent retailers

   $ 206,800    $ 199,240

Amounts due and paid to vendors

     202,499      194,807
    

  

Net gross margin

   $ 4,301    $ 4,433
    

  

 

7


Comprehensive Income:

 

The components of comprehensive income, net of related tax, for the 16 week periods ended June 14, 2003 and June 15, 2002 are as follows:

 

    

First Quarter

(16 weeks) Ended


     June 14, 2003

   June 15, 2002

Net earnings

   $ 73,670    $ 77,155

Amortization of loss on derivative financial instrument

     105      105
    

  

Total comprehensive income

   $ 73,775    $ 77,260
    

  

 

Net Earnings Per Share (EPS):

 

Basic EPS is calculated using earnings available to common shareholders divided by the weighted average of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS is similar to basic EPS except that the weighted average of common shares outstanding is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the dilutive potential common shares, such as options, had been exercised.

 

The following table reflects the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share:

 

    

First Quarter

(16 weeks) Ended


     June 14, 2003

   June 15, 2002

     (In thousands, except per share data)

Earnings per share—basic

             

Earnings available to common shareholders

   $ 73,670    $ 77,155

Weighted average shares outstanding

     133,719      133,812

Earnings per share—basic

   $ 0.55    $ 0.58

Earnings per share—diluted

             

Earnings available to common shareholders

   $ 73,670    $ 77,155

Weighted average shares outstanding

     133,719      133,812

Dilutive impact of options outstanding

     399      2,327
    

  

Weighted average shares and potential dilutive shares outstanding

     134,118      136,139

Earnings per share—diluted

   $ 0.55    $ 0.57
    

  

 

Stock-based Compensation:

 

The company has stock based employee compensation plans, which are described more fully in the Stock Option Plans note in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements set forth in the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2003. The company utilizes the intrinsic value-based method, per Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” for measuring the cost of compensation paid in company common stock. This method defines the company’s cost as the excess of the stock’s market value at the time of the grant over the amount that the employee is required to pay. In accordance with APB Opinion No. 25, no compensation expense was recognized for options issued under the stock option plans in fiscal 2004 and 2003

 

8


as the exercise price of all options granted was not less than 100 percent of fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant.

 

The following table illustrates the effect on net earnings and net earnings per share if the company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” to stock-based employee compensation:

 

    

First Quarter

(16 weeks) Ended


 
     June 14, 2003

    June 15, 2002

 
     (In thousands, except per share data)  

Net earnings, as reported

   $ 73,670     $ 77,155  

Deduct: total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax effect

     (3,361 )     (4,165 )
    


 


Pro forma net earnings

   $ 70,309     $ 72,990  
    


 


Earnings per share—basic:

                

As reported

   $ 0.55     $ 0.58  

Pro forma

   $ 0.53     $ 0.55  

Earnings per share—diluted:

                

As reported

   $ 0.55     $ 0.57  

Pro forma

   $ 0.52     $ 0.54  

 

Reclassifications:

 

Certain reclassifications have been made to conform prior years’ data to the current presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on reported earnings.

 

Prior to the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003, the amounts invoiced to independent retailers by the company for facilitative services were recorded as net sales and the related amounts due and paid by the company to its vendors were recorded as cost of sales. Commencing with the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003, the company has revised amounts previously reported by reclassifying cost of sales against net sales for all prior periods. The effect is to present the net gross margin associated with such facilitative services as a component of net sales. This reclassification had no impact on gross profit, earnings before income taxes, net earnings, cash flows, or financial position for any period or their respective trends.

 

New Accounting Standards

 

Recently Adopted Accounting Standards

 

In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations”, which addresses financial accounting and reporting for obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the associated asset retirement costs. The company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 143 in the first quarter of fiscal 2004. SFAS No. 143 did not have a material impact on the company’s consolidated financial statements.

 

In April 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 145, “Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44 and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections”. SFAS No. 145 allows only those gains and losses on the extinguishment of debt that meet the criteria of extraordinary items to be treated as such in the financial statements. SFAS No. 145 also requires sale-leaseback accounting for certain lease modifications that have economic effects that are similar to sales-leaseback transactions. Certain provisions of SFAS No. 145 were effective for transactions occurring after May 15, 2002, while the remaining provisions were effective for the company in the first quarter of fiscal 2004. SFAS No. 145 did not have a material impact on the company’s consolidated financial statements.

 

In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation (FIN) No. 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities”. FIN No. 46 states that companies that have exposure to the economic risks and potential rewards from another entity’s assets and activities have a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity and should consolidate the entity, despite the absence of clear control through a voting equity interest. The consolidation requirements apply to all variable interest entities created after January 31, 2003. For variable interest entities that existed prior to February 1, 2003, the consolidation requirements are effective for annual or interim periods beginning after June 15, 2003. Disclosure of significant variable interest entities is required in all financial statements issued after January 31, 2003, regardless of when the variable interest was created. FIN No. 46 did not have a material impact on the company’s consolidated financial statements.

 

9


Recently Issued Accounting Standards

 

Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 00-21, “Accounting for Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables”, addresses certain aspects of the accounting by a vendor for arrangements under which it will perform multiple revenue-generating activities. EITF Issue No. 00-21 establishes three principles: revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables should be divided into separate units of accounting, arrangement consideration should be allocated among the separate units of accounting based on their relative fair values, and revenue recognition criteria should be considered separately for separate units of accounting. EITF Issue No. 00-21 is effective for all revenue arrangements entered into in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2003. The company does not expect the adoption of EITF No. 00-21 to have a material impact on the company’s consolidated financial statements.

 

In April 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 149, “Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”. SFAS No. 149 amends and clarifies financial accounting and reporting for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments imbedded in other contracts and for hedging activities under SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”. SFAS No. 149 is effective for contracts entered into or modified after June 30, 2003, and for hedging relationships designated after June 30, 2003. The company does not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 149 to have a material impact on the company’s consolidated financial statements.

 

In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150, “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity”. SFAS No. 150 establishes standards for how an issuer classifies and measures certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. SFAS No. 150 is effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, and otherwise is effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. The company does not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 150 to have a material impact on the company’s consolidated financial statements.

 

RESTRUCTURE AND OTHER CHARGES

 

In the first quarter of fiscal 2004, the company recognized pre-tax restructure and other charges of $1.2 million reflected in the “Restructure and other charges” line in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings primarily due to continued softening of real estate in certain markets. The charges represent the net adjustment for changes in estimates related to prior years’ restructure reserves, including a net increase of $1.1 million to restructure 2001 and a net increase of $0.1 million to restructure 2000.

 

Restructure 2002

 

In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002, the company identified additional efforts that would allow it to extend its distribution efficiency program that began early in fiscal 2001. The additional distribution efficiency initiatives identified resulted in pre-tax restructure charges of $16.3 million, primarily related to personnel reductions in administrative and transportation functions. Management began the initiatives in fiscal 2003 and the majority of these actions were completed by the end of fiscal 2003.

 

In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003, the fiscal 2002 restructure charges were decreased by $3.6 million, including a decrease of $1.4 million due to lower than anticipated lease related costs in transportation efficiency initiatives and a decrease of $2.2 million in employee related costs due to lower than anticipated severance costs.

 

10


Remaining reserves for the fiscal 2002 restructure plan represent future lease payments as well as unpaid severance and employee related costs. Details of the fiscal 2002 restructure activity for fiscal 2004 are as follows:

 

    

Balance

February 22,

2003


  

Fiscal

2004
Usage


   

Balance

June 14,

2003


     (In thousands)

Lease related costs:

                     

Transportation efficiency initiatives

   $ 1,054    $ (266 )   $ 788
    

  


 

       1,054      (266 )     788

Employee related costs:

                     

Administrative realignment

     2,390      (1,835 )     555
    

  


 

       2,390      (1,835 )     555
    

  


 

Total restructure and other charges

   $ 3,444    $ (2,101 )   $ 1,343
    

  


 

 

 

Details of the fiscal 2002 restructure activity as it relates to the number of terminated employees are as follows:

 

 

    

Original

Estimate


  

Employees

Terminated

in Fiscal 2003


   

Balance
February 22,

2003


  

Employees

Terminated

in Fiscal 2004


   

Balance

June 14,

2003


Employees

   800    (650 )   150    (90 )   60

 

Restructure 2001

 

In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2001, the company completed a strategic review that identified certain assets that did not meet return objectives, provide long-term strategic opportunities or justify additional capital investments. This review process culminated in the company recording pre-tax restructure and other charges of $181.6 million, including $89.7 million for asset impairment charges, $52.1 million for lease subsidies, lease cancellation fees, future payments on exited real estate and guarantee obligations and $39.8 million for severance and employee related costs.

 

In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002, the fiscal 2001 restructure and other charges were increased by $17.8 million as a result of changes in estimates primarily due to the softening real estate market, including $19.1 million for increased lease liabilities in exiting the non-core retail markets and the disposal of non-core assets, offset by a net decrease of $1.3 million in restructure reserves for the consolidation of distribution centers.

 

In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003, the fiscal 2001 restructure and other charges were increased by $8.1 million, including an $11.7 million increase to the restructure reserves offset by a decrease in asset impairment charges of $3.6 million. The reserve increase of $11.7 million was a result of changes in estimates on exited real estate primarily due to the continued softening of real estate marketed for sublease in certain markets, including approximately $5 million relating to the consolidation of distribution centers and approximately $6 million relating to the exit of non-core retail markets and $1.2 million in higher than anticipated employee related costs primarily in the exit of non-core retail markets.

 

In the first quarter of fiscal 2004, the fiscal 2001 restructure and other charges were increased by $1.1 million as a result of changes in estimates on exited real estate primarily due to the continued softening of real estate marketed for sublease in certain markets.

 

11


Included in the asset impairment charges in fiscal 2001 of $89.7 million were $57.4 million of charges related to retail food properties and $32.3 million of charges related to food distribution properties. Writedowns for property, plant and equipment, goodwill and other intangibles, and other assets were $58.4 million, $21.8 million and $9.5 million, respectively, and were reflected in the “Restructure and other charges” line in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings for fiscal 2001. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003, the fiscal 2001 asset impairment charges for property, plant and equipment were decreased by $3.6 million primarily due to changes in estimates on exited real estate in certain markets and includes a decrease of $8.2 million in estimates related to certain food distribution properties offset by an increase of $4.6 million in estimates related to certain retail food properties. The impairment charges reflect the difference between the carrying value of the assets and the estimated fair values, which were based on the estimated market values for similar assets.

 

All activity for the fiscal 2001 restructure plan has been completed. Remaining reserves represent future payments on exited real estate and unpaid employee benefits. Details of the fiscal 2001 restructure activity for fiscal 2004 are as follows:

 

    

Balance

February 22,

2003


  

Fiscal

2004

Usage


   

Fiscal

2004

Adjustment


    

Balance

June 14,

2003


     (In thousands)

Lease related costs:

                              

Consolidation of distribution centers

   $ 6,473    $ (159 )   $ 602      $ 6,916

Exit of non-core retail markets

     8,844      (949 )     (279 )      7,616

Disposal of non-core assets and other administrative reductions

     4,299      (347 )     383        4,335
    

  


 


  

       19,616      (1,455 )     706        18,867

Employee related costs:

                              

Consolidation of distribution centers

     9,604      (1,625 )     319        8,298

Exit of non-core retail markets

     2,980      (1,086 )     13        1,907
    

  


 


  

       12,584      (2,711 )     332        10,205
    

  


 


  

Total restructure and other charges

   $ 32,200    $ (4,166 )   $ 1,038      $ 29,072
    

  


 


  

     Previously
Recorded


        

Fiscal

2004

Adjustment


    

June 14,

2003


Impairment charges

   $ 86,169            $ —        $ 86,169

 

12


The number of actual employees terminated under the fiscal 2001 restructure plan was adjusted to a lower number than originally expected primarily due to higher than anticipated voluntary attrition. There was no activity in fiscal 2004. Details of the fiscal 2001 restructure activity as it relates to the number of terminated employees are as follows:

 

    

Original

Estimate


  

Employees

Terminated

in Prior Years


    Adjustments
in Prior Years


   

Balance
February 22,

2003


Employees

   4,500    (3,767 )   (733 )   —  

 

Restructure 2000

 

In fiscal 2000, the company recorded pre-tax restructure and other charges of $103.6 million as a result of an extensive review to reduce costs and enhance efficiencies. Included in this total was $17.4 million for asset impairment costs. The restructure and other charges include costs for facility consolidation, non-core store disposal, and rationalization of redundant and certain decentralized administrative functions. The original reserve amount was reduced by $10.3 million in fiscal 2001, primarily as a result of a change in estimate for the closure of a remaining facility. The reserve amount was subsequently increased $12.2 million in fiscal 2002, due to a change in estimate on a remaining facility primarily due to the softening real estate market.

 

In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003, the fiscal 2000 restructure and other charges were decreased by $1.6 million, including a $2.9 million increase to the restructure reserves offset by a decrease in asset impairment charges of $4.5 million. The reserve increase of $2.9 million was a result of changes in estimates on exited real estate primarily due to the continued softening of real estate marketed for sublease in certain markets and higher than anticipated employee related costs.

 

In the first quarter of fiscal 2004, the fiscal 2000 restructure and other charges were increased by $0.1 million as a result of changes in estimates on exited real estate primarily due to the continued softening of real estate marketed for sublease in certain markets.

 

Included in the asset impairment charges in fiscal 2000 of $17.4 million were writedowns on food distribution assets of $10.6 million for property, plant and equipment, $5.6 million of goodwill and other intangibles, and $1.2 million for other assets that were reflected in the “Restructure and other charges” line in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings for fiscal 2000. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003, the fiscal 2000 asset impairment charges for property, plant and equipment on food distribution properties were decreased by $4.5 million primarily due to changes in estimates on exited real estate in certain markets. The impairment charges reflect the difference between the carrying value of the assets and the estimated fair values, which were based on the estimated market values for similar assets.

 

All activity for the fiscal 2000 restructure plan has been completed. Remaining reserves represent future payments on exited real estate. Details of the fiscal 2000 restructure activity for fiscal 2004 are as follows:

 

    

Balance

February 22,

2003


  

Fiscal

2004

Usage


   

Fiscal

2004

Adjustment


   

Balance

June 14,

2003


     (In thousands)

Lease related costs:

                             

Facility consolidation

   $ 8,083    $ (722 )   $ (14 )   $ 7,347

Non-core store disposal

     3,042      (513 )     147       2,676
    

  


 


 

Total restructure and other charges

   $ 11,125    $ (1,235 )   $ 133     $ 10,023
    

  


 


 

     Previously
Recorded


        

Fiscal

2004

Adjustment


   

June 14,

2003


Impairment charges

     12,964            $     $ 12,964

 

13


The number of actual employees terminated under the fiscal 2000 restructure plan was adjusted to a lower number than originally expected primarily due to higher than anticipated voluntary attrition. There was no activity in fiscal 2003 or fiscal 2004. Details of the fiscal 2000 restructure activity as it relates to employees are as follows:

 

    

Original

Estimate


  

Employees

Terminated
in Prior Years


   

Adjustments

in Prior Years


   

Balance

February 23,

2002


Employees

   2,517    (1,693 )   (824 )   —  

 

RESERVES FOR CLOSED PROPERTIES AND ASSET IMPAIRMENT

 

The company maintains reserves for estimated losses on retail stores, distribution warehouses and other properties that are no longer being utilized in current operations. The reserves for closed properties include management’s estimates for lease subsidies, lease terminations, future payments on exited real estate and severance. Details of the activity in the closed property reserves for fiscal 2004 are as follows:

 

    

Balance

February 22,

2003


   Additions

   Usage

   

Balance

June 14,

2003


Reserves for Closed Properties

   $ 49,873    1,644    (2,487 )   $  49,030

 

The company recognized impairment charges of $1.1 million for fiscal 2004 on the write-down of property, plant and equipment for closed properties, all of which related to food distribution. Impairment charges, a component of selling and administrative expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings, reflect the difference between the carrying value of the assets and the estimated fair values, which were based on the estimated market values for similar assets.

 

GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS

 

At June 14, 2003, the company had approximately $1.6 billion of goodwill on its Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets of which $0.9 billion was related to retail food and $0.7 billion was related to food distribution.

 

The carrying amount of other intangible assets as of June 14, 2003 are as follows:

 

    

Balance

June 14, 2003


     Gross Carrying
Amount


  

Accumulated

Amortization


    Net Carrying
Amount


     (in thousands)

Non-compete agreements

   $ 8,506    $ (4,661 )   $ 3,845

Customer lists and other

     8,443      (4,464 )     3,979
    

  


 

Total

   $ 16,949    $ (9,125 )   $ 7,824
    

  


 

 

Other intangible assets are presented in the “Other assets” line in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. Amortization expense of approximately $0.4 million was recorded in the first quarter of fiscal 2004. Future amortization expense will approximate $1.0 million per year for each of the next five years. Intangible assets with a definite life are amortized on a straight-line basis with estimated useful lives ranging from five to ten years.

 

14


FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

 

Interest Rate Swap Agreements

 

On February 25, 2001, the effective date of SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”, the company’s existing interest rate swap agreements were recorded at fair value in the company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. On July 6, 2001, the swaps were terminated and the remaining fair market value adjustments, which are offsetting, are being amortized over the original term of the hedge. Approximately $0.3 million of after-tax loss is expected to be amortized into the Consolidated Statements of Earnings from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Losses within the next 12 months.

 

In the first quarter of fiscal 2003, the company entered into swap agreements in the notional amount of $225.0 million that exchange a fixed interest rate payment obligation for a floating interest rate payment obligation. The swaps have been designated as a fair value hedge on long-term fixed rate debt of the company and are reflected in “Other assets” in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. At June 14, 2003, the hedge was highly effective. Changes in the fair value of the swaps and debt are reflected as a component of selling and administrative expense in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings, and through June 14, 2003, the net earnings impact was zero.

 

The company has limited involvement with derivative financial instruments and uses them only to manage well-defined interest rate risks. The company does not use financial instruments or derivatives for any trading or other speculative purposes.

 

COMMITMENTS, CONTINGENCIES AND OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

 

The company has guaranteed certain leases, fixture financing loans and other debt obligations of various retailers at June 14, 2003. These guarantees were made to support the business growth of affiliated retailers. The guarantees are generally for the entire term of the lease or other debt obligation. For each guarantee issued, if the affiliated retailer defaults on a payment, the company would be required to make payments under its guarantee. Generally, the guarantees are secured by indemnification agreements or personal guarantees of the affiliated retailer. At June 14, 2003, the maximum amount of undiscounted payments the company would be required to make in the event of default of all guarantees is $301.5 million and represents $197.9 million on a discounted basis. In addition, the company has guaranteed construction loans on warehouses of $34.2 million at June 14, 2003 that the company will purchase upon completion. In April 2003, the company refinanced a synthetic lease including a residual value guarantee with a fair value of approximately $3.5 million reflected in “Other liabilities” in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 14, 2003.

 

In July and August 2002, several class action lawsuits were filed against the company and certain of its officers and directors in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota on behalf of purchasers of the company’s securities between July 11, 1999 and June 26, 2002. The lawsuits have been consolidated into a single action, in which it is alleged that the company and certain of its officers and directors violated Federal securities laws by issuing materially false and misleading statements relating to its financial performance. The company believes that the lawsuit is without merit and intends to vigorously defend the action. No damages have been specified. The company is unable to evaluate the likelihood of prevailing in the case at this stage of the proceedings.

 

The company is a party to various other legal proceedings arising from the normal course of business activities, none of which, in management’s opinion, is expected to have a material adverse impact on the company’s consolidated statement of earnings or consolidated financial position.

 

SEGMENT INFORMATION

 

Refer to page 3 for the company’s segment information.

 

15


ITEM 2.   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

In the first quarter of fiscal 2004, the company achieved net sales of $5.8 billion compared with $5.7 billion in the first quarter of last year. Net earnings for the first quarter of fiscal 2004 were $73.7 million, and diluted earnings per share were $0.55 compared with $77.2 million and diluted earnings per share of $0.57 in the first quarter of last year.

 

Net Sales

 

Net sales for the first quarter of fiscal 2004 were $5.8 billion, an increase of 3.2 percent from the first quarter of last year. Retail food sales were 50.7 percent of net sales for the first quarter of fiscal 2004 compared with 49.7 percent for the first quarter of last year. Food distribution sales were 49.3 percent of net sales for the first quarter of fiscal 2004 compared with 50.3 percent for the first quarter of last year.

 

Retail food sales for the first quarter of fiscal 2004 increased 5.1 percent compared with the first quarter of last year, primarily reflecting new store openings and the full quarter inclusion of Deals$—Nothing Over a Dollar (Deals) stores, which was acquired late in last year’s first quarter. Same-store retail sales for the first quarter of fiscal 2004 were 0.4 percent, impacted by approximately 0.7 percent in cannibalization within key expansion markets. Cannibalization is defined as the negative sales impact the opening of a new store has on an existing store in the same market. As the company adds new stores to major existing markets, it experiences cannibalization.

 

Store activity since last year’s first quarter, including licensed stores, resulted in 152 new stores opened and 46 stores closed for a total of 1,436 stores at the end of first quarter fiscal 2004. Total retail square footage, including licensed stores, increased approximately 4.7 percent from last year’s first quarter.

 

Food distribution sales for the first quarter of fiscal 2004 increased 1.3 percent compared with the first quarter of last year, primarily reflecting new business with existing customers, which more than offset customer attrition.

 

Gross Profit

 

Gross profit (calculated as net sales less cost of sales), as a percentage of net sales, was 13.7 percent for the first quarter of fiscal 2004 compared with 13.4 percent for the first quarter of last year. The increase in gross profit, as a percentage of net sales, reflects the growing proportion of the company’s retail food business, including the higher gross profit margin of Deals acquired late in last year’s first quarter, which operates at a higher gross profit margin as a percentage of net sales than does the food distribution business.

 

Selling and Administrative Expenses

 

Selling and administrative expenses, as a percentage of net sales, were 10.9 percent for the first quarter of fiscal 2004 compared with 10.3 percent in the first quarter of last year. The increase in selling and administrative expenses, as a percentage of net sales, reflects the growing proportion of the company’s retail food business, including the higher selling and administrative expense ratio of Deals acquired late in last year’s first quarter, which operates at a higher selling and administrative expense as a percentage of net sales than does the food distribution business. In addition, the increase reflects a lack of expense leverage from increases in employee benefit related costs and approximately $5 million, net, in litigation settlements.

 

Operating Earnings

 

Operating earnings for the first quarter of fiscal 2004 decreased 7.1 percent to $161.8 million compared with $174.3 million in the first quarter of last year. First quarter of fiscal 2004 operating earnings include approximately $5 million, net, in litigation settlements and $1.2 million in pre-tax restructure and other charges. Retail food first quarter of fiscal 2004 operating earnings decreased 4.3 percent to $123.6 million, or 4.2 percent of net sales, from last year’s first quarter operating earnings of $129.1 million, or 4.6 percent of net sales. The decrease in retail food operating earnings was primarily due to a lack of expense leverage from increases in employee benefit related costs, which continue to increase at a rate faster than sales growth, and the higher mix of new stores, primarily Deals stores, both new and acquired. Food distribution first quarter of fiscal 2004 operating earnings increased 1.8 percent to $58.2 million, or 2.0 percent of net sales, from last year’s first quarter operating earnings of $57.2 million, or 2.0 percent of net sales. The increase in food distribution operating earnings primarily reflects the impact of higher sales volume and benefits of efficiency initiatives implemented during the course of the prior year, which more than offset the changing customer mix and increases in employee benefit related costs.

 

16


Net Interest Expense

 

Interest expense decreased to $49.6 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2004 compared with $58.1 million in the first quarter of last year, reflecting lower borrowing levels and lower average interest rates, largely due to the interest rate swap agreements entered into in the first quarter of fiscal 2003. Interest income decreased to $5.1 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2004 compared with $6.2 million in the first quarter of last year, reflecting lower invested cash balances and lower average interest rates.

 

Income Taxes

 

The effective tax rate was 37.25 and 37.0 percent in the first quarter of fiscal 2004 and fiscal 2003, respectively.

 

Net Earnings

 

Net earnings were $73.7 million, or $0.55 per diluted share, in the first quarter of fiscal 2004 compared with net earnings of $77.2 million, or $0.57 per diluted share in the first quarter of last year.

 

Weighted average diluted shares decreased to 134.1 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2004 compared with 136.1 shares in the first quarter of last year, reflecting the net impact of stock option activity and shares repurchased under the treasury stock program.

 

RESTRUCTURE AND OTHER CHARGES

 

In the first quarter of fiscal 2004, the company recognized pre-tax restructure and other charges of $1.2 million reflected in “Restructure and other charges” line in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings primarily due to continued softening of real estate in certain markets. The charges represent the net adjustment for changes in estimates related to prior years’ restructure reserves, including a net increase of $1.1 million to restructure 2001 and a net increase of $0.1 million to restructure 2000.

 

Restructure 2002

 

In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002, the company identified additional efforts that would allow it to extend its distribution efficiency program that began early in fiscal 2001. The additional distribution efficiency initiatives identified resulted in pre-tax restructure charges of $16.3 million, primarily related to personnel reductions in administrative and transportation functions. Management began the initiatives in fiscal 2003 and the majority of these actions were completed by the end of fiscal 2003.

 

In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003, the fiscal 2002 restructure charges were decreased by $3.6 million, including a decrease of $1.4 million due to lower than anticipated lease related costs in transportation efficiency initiatives and a decrease of $2.2 million in employee related costs due to lower than anticipated severance costs.

 

17


Remaining reserves for the fiscal 2002 restructure plan represent future lease payments as well as unpaid severance and employee related costs. Details of the fiscal 2002 restructure activity for fiscal 2004 are as follows:

 

    

Balance

February 22,

2003


  

Fiscal

2004

Usage


   

Balance

June 14,

2003


     (In thousands)

Lease related costs:

                     

Transportation efficiency initiatives

   $ 1,054    $ (266 )   $ 788
    

  


 

       1,054      (266 )     788

Employee related costs:

                     

Administrative realignment

     2,390      (1,835 )     555
    

  


 

       2,390      (1,835 )     555
    

  


 

Total restructure and other charges

   $ 3,444    $ (2,101 )   $ 1,343
    

  


 

 

Details of the fiscal 2002 restructure activity as it relates to the number of terminated employees are as follows:

 

    

Original

Estimate


  

Employees

Terminated

in Fiscal 2003


   

Balance
February 22,

2003


  

Employees

Terminated

in Fiscal 2004


   

Balance

June 14,

2003


Employees

   800    (650 )   150    (90 )   60

 

Restructure 2001

 

In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2001, the company completed a strategic review that identified certain assets that did not meet return objectives, provide long-term strategic opportunities or justify additional capital investments. This review process culminated in the company recording pre-tax restructure and other charges of $181.6 million, including $89.7 million for asset impairment charges, $52.1 million for lease subsidies, lease cancellation fees, future payments on exited real estate and guarantee obligations and $39.8 million for severance and employee related costs.

 

In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002, the fiscal 2001 restructure and other charges were increased by $17.8 million as a result of changes in estimates primarily due to the softening real estate market, including $19.1 million for increased lease liabilities in exiting the non-core retail markets and the disposal of non-core assets, offset by a net decrease of $1.3 million in restructure reserves for the consolidation of distribution centers.

 

In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003, the fiscal 2001 restructure and other charges were increased by $8.1 million, including an $11.7 million increase to the restructure reserves offset by a decrease in asset impairment charges of $3.6 million. The reserve increase of $11.7 million was a result of changes in estimates on exited real estate primarily due to the continued softening of real estate marketed for sublease in certain markets, including approximately $5 million relating to the consolidation of distribution centers and approximately $6 million relating to the exit of non-core retail markets and $1.2 million in higher than anticipated employee related costs primarily in the exit of non-core retail markets.

 

18


In the first quarter of fiscal 2004, the fiscal 2001 restructure and other charges were increased by $1.1 million as a result of changes in estimates on exited real estate primarily due to the continued softening of real estate marketed for sublease in certain markets.

 

Included in the asset impairment charges in fiscal 2001 of $89.7 million were $57.4 million of charges related to retail food properties and $32.3 million of charges related to food distribution properties. Writedowns for property, plant and equipment, goodwill and other intangibles, and other assets were $58.4 million, $21.8 million and $9.5 million, respectively, and were reflected in the “Restructure and other charges” line in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings for fiscal 2001. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003, the fiscal 2001 asset impairment charges for property, plant and equipment were decreased by $3.6 million primarily due to changes in estimates on exited real estate in certain markets and includes a decrease of $8.2 million in estimates related to certain food distribution properties offset by an increase of $4.6 million in estimates related to certain retail food properties. The impairment charges reflect the difference between the carrying value of the assets and the estimated fair values, which were based on the estimated market values for similar assets.

 

All activity for the fiscal 2001 restructure plan has been completed. Remaining reserves represent future payments on exited real estate and unpaid employee benefits. Details of the fiscal 2001 restructure activity for fiscal 2004 are as follows:

 

    

Balance

February 22,

2003


  

Fiscal

2004

Usage


   

Fiscal

2004

Adjustment


   

Balance

June 14,

2003


     (In thousands)

Lease related costs:

                             

Consolidation of distribution centers

   $ 6,473    $ (159 )   $ 602     $ 6,916

Exit of non-core retail markets

     8,844      (949 )     (279 )     7,616

Disposal of non-core assets and other administrative reductions

     4,299      (347 )     383       4,335
    

  


 


 

       19,616      (1,455 )     706       18,867

Employee related costs:

                             

Consolidation of distribution centers

     9,604      (1,625 )     319       8,298

Exit of non-core retail markets

     2,980      (1,086 )     13       1,907
    

  


 


 

       12,584      (2,711 )     332       10,205
    

  


 


 

Total restructure and other charges

   $ 32,200    $ (4,166 )   $ 1,038     $ 29,072
    

  


 


 

                               
     Previously
Recorded


        

Fiscal

2004

Adjustment


   

June 14,

2003


Impairment charges

   $ 86,169            $ —       $ 86,169

 

19


The number of actual employees terminated under the fiscal 2001 restructure plan was adjusted to a lower number than originally expected primarily due to higher than anticipated voluntary attrition. There was no activity in fiscal 2004. Details of the fiscal 2001 restructure activity as it relates to the number of terminated employees are as follows:

 

    

Original

Estimate


  

Employees

Terminated

in Prior Years


    Adjustments
in Prior Years


   

Balance
February 22,

2003


Employees

   4,500    (3,767 )   (733 )       —  

 

Restructure 2000

 

In fiscal 2000, the company recorded pre-tax restructure and other charges of $103.6 million as a result of an extensive review to reduce costs and enhance efficiencies. Included in this total was $17.4 million for asset impairment costs. The restructure and other charges include costs for facility consolidation, non-core store disposal, and rationalization of redundant and certain decentralized administrative functions. The original reserve amount was reduced by $10.3 million in fiscal 2001, primarily as a result of a change in estimate for the closure of a remaining facility. The reserve amount was subsequently increased $12.2 million in fiscal 2002, due to a change in estimate on a remaining facility primarily due to the softening real estate market.

 

In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003, the fiscal 2000 restructure and other charges were decreased by $1.6 million, including a $2.9 million increase to the restructure reserves offset by a decrease in asset impairment charges of $4.5 million. The reserve increase of $2.9 million was a result of changes in estimates on exited real estate primarily due to the continued softening of real estate marketed for sublease in certain markets and higher than anticipated employee related costs.

 

In the first quarter of fiscal 2004, the fiscal 2000 restructure and other charges were increased by $0.1 million as a result of changes in estimates on exited real estate primarily due to the continued softening of real estate marketed for sublease in certain markets.

 

Included in the asset impairment charges in fiscal 2000 of $17.4 million were writedowns on food distribution assets of $10.6 million for property, plant and equipment, $5.6 million of goodwill and other intangibles, and $1.2 million for other assets that were reflected in the “Restructure and other charges” line in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings for fiscal 2000. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003, the fiscal 2000 asset impairment charges for property, plant and equipment on food distribution properties were decreased by $4.5 million primarily due to changes in estimates on exited real estate in certain markets. The impairment charges reflect the difference between the carrying value of the assets and the estimated fair values, which were based on the estimated market values for similar assets.

 

All activity for the fiscal 2000 restructure plan has been completed. Remaining reserves represent future payments on exited real estate. Details of the fiscal 2000 restructure activity for fiscal 2004 are as follows:

 

    

Balance

February 22,

2003


  

Fiscal

2004

Usage


   

Fiscal

2004

Adjustment


   

Balance

June 14,

2003


     (In thousands)

Lease related costs:

                             

Facility consolidation

   $ 8,083    $ (722 )   $ (14 )   $ 7,347

Non-core store disposal

     3,042      (513 )     147       2,676
    

  


 


 

Total restructure and other charges

     11,125      (1,235 )     133       10,023
    

  


 


 

                               
     Previously
Recorded


        

Fiscal

2004

Adjustment


   

June 14,

2003


Impairment charges

   $ 12,964            $ —       $ 12,964

 

 

20


The number of actual employees terminated under the fiscal 2000 restructure plan was adjusted to a lower number than originally expected primarily due to higher than anticipated voluntary attrition. There was no activity in fiscal 2003 or fiscal 2004. Details of the fiscal 2000 restructure activity as it relates to employees are as follows:

 

    

Original

Estimate


  

Employees

Terminated

in Prior Years


   

Adjustments

in Prior Years


   

Balance

February 23,

2002


Employees

   2,517    (1,693 )   (824 )   —  
    
  

 

 

 

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

 

Net cash provided by operating activities was $214.9 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2004 compared with $221.5 million for the first quarter of last year.

 

Net cash used in investing activities was $56.3 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2004 compared with $125.3 million for the first quarter of last year. First quarter of fiscal 2004 investing activities primarily reflect capital spending to fund retail store expansion, store remodeling, Save-A-Lot distribution facilities and technology enhancements. First quarter of fiscal 2003 investing activities primarily reflect capital spending to fund retail store expansion, including the acquisition of Deals, store remodeling and technology enhancements.

 

Net cash used in financing activities was $116.0 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2004 compared with cash provided by financing activities of $238.5 million for the first quarter of last year. First quarter of fiscal 2004 financing activities primarily reflect a net reduction of $80.0 million in notes payable. First quarter of fiscal 2003 financing activities primarily reflect the issuance of $300.0 million 10-year 7.50% Senior Notes, completed in May 2002.

 

Management expects that the company will continue to replenish operating assets with internally generated funds. There can be no assurance, however, that the company’s business will continue to generate cash flow at current levels. The company will continue to obtain short-term financing from its revolving credit agreement with various financial institutions, as well as through its accounts receivable securitization program. Long-term financing will be maintained through existing and new debt issuances. The company’s short-term and long-term financing abilities are believed to be adequate as a supplement to internally generated cash flows to fund its capital expenditures and acquisitions as opportunities arise. Maturities of debt issued will depend on management’s views with respect to the relative attractiveness of interest rates at the time of issuance and other debt maturities.

 

As of June 14, 2003, the company had no outstanding borrowings under its unsecured $650.0 million revolving credit facility. As of June 14, 2003, letters of credit outstanding under the credit facility were $144.4 million and the unused available credit under the facility was $505.6 million.

 

As of June 14, 2003 the company had no outstanding borrowings under the company’s $200.0 million accounts receivable securitization program. The company is in the process of renewing its accounts receivable securitization program, which expires in August of 2003.

 

In November 2001, the company sold zero-coupon convertible debentures due 2031. Holders of the debentures may require the company to purchase all or a portion of their debentures on the first day of October 2003, 2006 and 2011 at a purchase price equal to the accreted value of the debentures, which includes accrued and unpaid interest. The timing and volume of future repurchases will depend on market conditions. In the event SUPERVALU’s stock price reaches the convertible debentures’ conversion trigger price of $35.40 in the second quarter of fiscal 2004, the company would be required to include an additional 7.8 million shares in its diluted shares outstanding calculation for the third quarter of fiscal 2004.

 

The company is party to synthetic leasing programs for two of its major warehouses. The leases expire in September 2004 and April 2008. The lease that expires in September 2004 may be renewed with the lessor’s consent through September 2006, and has a purchase option of approximately $25 million. In April 2003, the company refinanced the lease that now expires in April 2008. This lease may be renewed with the lessor’s consent through April 2013, and has a purchase option of approximately $60 million.

 

21


COMMITMENTS, CONTINGENCIES AND OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

 

The company has guaranteed certain leases, fixture financing loans and other debt obligations of various retailers at June 14, 2003. These guarantees were made to support the business growth of affiliated retailers. The guarantees are generally for the entire term of the lease or other debt obligation. For each guarantee issued, if the affiliated retailer defaults on a payment, the company would be required to make payments under its guarantee. Generally, the guarantees are secured by indemnification agreements or personal guarantees of the affiliated retailer. At June 14, 2003, the maximum amount of undiscounted payments the company would be required to make in the event of default of all guarantees is $301.5 million and represents $197.9 million on a discounted basis. In addition, the company has guaranteed construction loans on warehouses of $34.2 million at June 14, 2003 that the company will purchase upon completion. In April 2003, the company refinanced a synthetic lease including a residual value guarantee with a fair value of approximately $3.5 million reflected in “Other liabilities” in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 14, 2003.

 

In July and August 2002, several class action lawsuits were filed against the company and certain of its officers and directors in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota on behalf of purchasers of the company’s securities between July 11, 1999 and June 26, 2002. The lawsuits have been consolidated into a single action, in which it is alleged that the company and certain of its officers and directors violated Federal securities laws by issuing materially false and misleading statements relating to its financial performance. The company believes that the lawsuit is without merit and intends to vigorously defend the action. No damages have been specified. The company is unable to evaluate the likelihood of prevailing in the case at this stage of the proceedings.

 

The company is a party to various other legal proceedings arising from the normal course of business activities, none of which, in management’s opinion, is expected to have a material adverse impact on the company’s consolidated statement of earnings or consolidated financial position.

 

NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

 

Recently Adopted Accounting Standards

 

In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations”, which addresses financial accounting and reporting for obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the associated asset retirement costs. The company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 143 in the first quarter of fiscal 2004. SFAS No. 143 did not have a material impact on the company’s consolidated financial statements.

 

In April 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 145, “Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44 and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections”. SFAS No. 145 allows only those gains and losses on the extinguishment of debt that meet the criteria of extraordinary items to be treated as such in the financial statements. SFAS No. 145 also requires sales-leaseback accounting for certain lease modifications that have economic effects that are similar to sales-leaseback transactions. Certain provisions of SFAS No. 145 were effective for transactions occurring after May 15, 2002, while the remaining provisions were effective for the company in the first quarter of fiscal 2004. SFAS No. 145 did not have a material impact on the company’s consolidated financial statements.

 

In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation (FIN) No. 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities”. FIN No. 46 states that companies that have exposure to the economic risks and potential rewards from another entity’s assets and activities have a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity and should consolidate the entity, despite the absence of clear control through a voting equity interest. The consolidation requirements apply to all variable interest entities created after January 31, 2003. For variable interest entities that existed prior to February 1, 2003, the consolidation requirements are effective for annual or interim periods beginning after June 15, 2003. Disclosure of significant variable interest entities is required in all financial statements issued after January 31, 2003, regardless of when the variable interest was created. FIN No. 46 did not have a material impact on the company’s consolidated financial statements.

 

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

 

Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 00-21, “Accounting for Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables”, addresses certain aspects of the accounting by a vendor for arrangements under which it will perform multiple revenue-generating activities. EITF Issue No. 00-21 establishes three principles: revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables should be divided into separate units of accounting, arrangement consideration should be allocated among the separate units of accounting based on their relative fair values, and revenue recognition criteria should be considered separately for separate units of accounting. EITF Issue No. 00-21 is effective for all revenue arrangements entered into in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2003. The company does not expect the adoption of EITF No. 00-21 to have a material impact on the company’s consolidated financial statements.

 

22


In April 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 149, “Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”. SFAS No. 149 amends and clarifies financial accounting and reporting for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments imbedded in other contracts and for hedging activities under SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”. SFAS No. 149 is effective for contracts entered into or modified after June 30, 2003, and for hedging relationships designated after June 30, 2003. The company does not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 149 to have a material impact on the company’s consolidated financial statements.

 

In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150, “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity”. SFAS No. 150 establishes standards for how an issuer classifies and measures certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. SFAS No. 150 is effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, and otherwise is effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. The company does not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 150 to have a material impact on the company’s consolidated financial statements.

 

Cautionary Statements for Purposes of the Safe Harbor Provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995

 

Any statements in this report regarding SUPERVALU’s outlook for its businesses and their respective markets, such as projections of future performance, statements of management’s plans and objectives, forecasts of market trends and other matters, are forward-looking statements based on management’s assumptions and beliefs. Such statements may be identified by such words or phrases as “will likely result,” “are expected to,” “will continue,” “outlook,” “is anticipated,” “estimate,” “project,” “management believes” or similar expressions. Such forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those discussed in such forward-looking statements and no assurance can be given that the results in any forward-looking statement will be achieved. For these statements, SUPERVALU claims the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

 

The following is a summary of certain factors, the results of which could cause SUPERVALU’s future results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in any forward-looking statements contained in this report:

 

  ·   competitive practices in the retail food and food distribution industries,

 

  ·   the nature and extent of the consolidation of the retail food and food distribution industries,

 

  ·   our ability to attract and retain customers for our food distribution business and to control food distribution costs,

 

  ·   our ability to grow through acquisitions and successfully integrate acquired entities,

 

  ·   economic conditions that affect the food industry, such as food price deflation and softness in local and national economies, as well as general economic or political conditions that affect consumer buying habits generally,

 

  ·   wartime activities, threats, and acts of terror directed at the food industry that affect consumer behavior, as well as related security costs,

 

  ·   potential work disruptions from labor disputes or national emergencies,

 

  ·   the timing and implementation of certain restructure activities we have announced, including our consolidation of certain distribution facilities and our disposition of under-performing stores and non-operating properties,

 

  ·   our ability to manage increases in health care and pension costs,

 

  ·   the availability of favorable credit and trade terms, and

 

  ·   other risk factors inherent in the retail food and food distribution industries.

 

These risks and uncertainties are set forth in further detail in Exhibit 99.1 to this report. Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which such statement is made, and SUPERVALU undertakes no obligation to update such statement to reflect events or circumstances arising after such date.

 

ITEM 3.   QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

 

There were no material changes in market risk for the company in the period covered by this report. See our Annual Report on Form 10-K for a discussion of market risk for the company.

 

23


ITEM 4.   CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

 

(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.

 

The company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the company’s management, including the company’s chief executive officer and its chief financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)) as of June 14, 2003, the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, the chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that as of the Evaluation Date, the company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the company in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms.

 

(b) Changes in internal controls.

 

During the fiscal quarter ended June 14, 2003, there has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

24


PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

 

Item 1.   Legal Proceedings

 

In July and August 2002, several class action lawsuits were filed against the company and certain of its officers and directors in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota on behalf of purchasers of the company’s securities between July 11, 1999 and June 26, 2002. The lawsuits have been consolidated into a single action, in which it is alleged that the company and certain of its officers and directors violated Federal securities laws by issuing materially false and misleading statements relating to its financial performance. The company believes that the lawsuit is without merit and intends to vigorously defend the action. No damages have been specified. The company is unable to evaluate the likelihood of prevailing in the case at this stage of the proceedings.

 

The company is a party to various other legal proceedings arising from the normal course of business activities, none of which, in management’s opinion, is expected to have a material adverse impact on the company’s consolidated statement of earnings or consolidated financial position.

 

Item 2.   Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds

 

None

 

Item 3.   Defaults Upon Senior Securities

 

None

 

Item 4.   Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

 

The Registrant held its Annual Meeting of Stockholders on May 29, 2003 at which the stockholders took the following actions:

 

  (i)   Elected Irwin Cohen, Lawrence A. Del Santo, Susan E. Engel and Harriet Perlmutter to the Board of Directors for terms expiring in 2006. The votes cast for and withheld with respect to each such Director were as follows:

 

     Votes For

   Votes Withheld

Irwin Cohen

   119,989,050    2,276,310

Lawrence A. Del Santo

   119,962,863    2,302,497

Susan E. Engel

   117,832,337    4,433,023

Harriet Perlmutter

   117,641,536    4,623,824

 

The Directors whose terms continued after the meeting are as follows: Edwin C. Gage, Garnett L. Keith, Jr., Richard L. Knowlton, Charles M. Lillis, Jeffrey Noddle, and Steven S. Rogers.

 

  (ii)   Approved by a vote of 62,068,945 for, 34,515,580 against, and 5,429,651 abstaining, a stockholder proposal requesting the company’s Board of Directors to establish a policy of expensing in the company’s annual income statement the costs of all future stock options issued by the company.

 

  (iii)   Ratified by a vote of 117,497,208 for, 3,888,306 against, and 879,846 abstaining, the appointment of KPMG LLP as independent auditors of the Registrant for the fiscal year ending February 28, 2004.

 

25


Item 5.   Other Information

 

None

 

Item 6.   Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K.

 

(a) Exhibits filed with this Form 10-Q:

 

(12 )   

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.

(31.1 )    Chief Executive Officer Certification of Periodic Financial Report pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
(31.2 )    Chief Financial Officer Certification of Periodic Financial Report pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
(32.1 )    Chief Executive Officer Certification of Periodic Financial Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
(32.2 )    Chief Financial Officer Certification of Periodic Financial Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
(99.1 )   

Cautionary Statements Pursuant to the Securities Litigation Reform Act.

 

Reports on Form 8-K:

 

  (i)   On April 10, 2003, the Registrant furnished a report on Form 8-K reporting under Item 9 “Regulation FD Disclosure”, the results for its fourth quarter ended February 22, 2003

 

  (ii)   On June 2, 2003, the Registrant furnished a report on Form 8-K reporting under Item 9 “Regulation FD Disclosure”, the presentations of Jeffrey Noddle, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer and Pamela K. Knous, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, delivered at the company’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders held May 29, 2003.

 

 

 

26


SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

       

Supervalu Inc. (Registrant)

Dated: July 29, 2003

     

By:

 

/s/    PAMELA K. KNOUS


               

Pamela K. Knous

Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer

(principal financial and accounting officer)

 

27


EXHIBIT INDEX

 

 

Exhibit

    
(12)   

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.

(31.1)    Chief Executive Officer Certification of Periodic Financial Report pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
(31.2)    Chief Financial Officer Certification of Periodic Financial Report pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
(32.1)    Chief Executive Officer Certification of Periodic Financial Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
(32.2)    Chief Financial Officer Certification of Periodic Financial Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
(99.1)   

Cautionary Statements Pursuant to the Securities Litigation Reform Act.

 

28