UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF
REGISTERED MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act file number 811-5785
MFS INVESTMENT GRADE MUNICIPAL TRUST
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)
500 Boylston Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02116
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Susan S. Newton
Massachusetts Financial Services Company
500 Boylston Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02116
(Name and address of agents for service)
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (617) 954-5000
Date of fiscal year end: November 30
Date of reporting period: May 31, 2010
ITEM 1. | REPORTS TO STOCKHOLDERS. |
Semiannual report
MFS® Investment Grade Municipal Trust
5/31/10
CXH-SEM
MFS® Investment Grade Municipal Trust
New York Stock Exchange Symbol: CXH
NOT FDIC INSURED MAY LOSE VALUE NO BANK GUARANTEE
Dear Shareholders:
After having suffered their biggest declines since the Great Depression, most global markets experienced an impressive resurgence during the latter months of 2009 and the first quarter of 2010. The global economy was able to reap the benefits of two major trends. The first of these was the massive efforts of governments and central banks to increase liquidity in the financial system as they sought to prevent the credit crisis from further affecting the banking system. The second was the move by companies around the world to cut costs and operations to prepare for rapidly changing market conditions. We believe that these moves not only shortened the length of the downturn but also set the stage for recovery.
Even with the significant market gains of 2009 and the early part of 2010, the recovery is unrolling at a moderate pace, with rebounds in the manufacturing sector and corporate America leading the way. Central bankers are proceeding with caution and many have held benchmark interest rates unchanged as they debate the best way to withdraw stimulus measures without disrupting the fragile growth process. Complicating that debate late in the period was the emergence of the European debt crisis and worries about whether this crisis could derail the global recovery.
While hurdles remain, we believe that the global economy is proceeding on the road to recovery. As always, we continue to be mindful of the many challenges faced at the individual, national, and international levels. It is at times such as these that we want to remind investors of the merits of maintaining a long-term view, adhering to basic investing principles such as asset allocation and diversification, and working closely with advisors to identify and research investment opportunities. At MFS®, we take particular pride in how well mutual funds can help investors by providing the diversification that is important in any type of market climate.
Respectfully,
Robert J. Manning
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
MFS Investment Management®
July 15, 2010
The opinions expressed in this letter are subject to change, may not be relied upon for investment advice, and no forecasts can be guaranteed.
1
2
Portfolio Composition continued
(a) | Included in the rating categories are: debt securities and the underlying bonds of non-primary inverse floaters, which have long-term public ratings. All rated securities are assigned a rating in accordance with the following ratings hierarchy: If a security is rated by Moodys, then that rating is used; if not rated by Moodys, then a Standard & Poors rating is used; if not rated by S&P, then a Fitch rating is used. Any equity securities are listed separately. The Other category includes cash, other assets, liabilities (including any derivative offsets), short-term and unrated debt securities. Ratings from Moodys (e.g., Aaa) are shown in the S&P and Fitch scale (e.g. AAA). All ratings are subject to change. |
(d) | Duration is a measure of how much a bonds price is likely to fluctuate with general changes in interest rates, e.g., if rates rise 1.00%, a bond with a 5-year duration is likely to lose about 5.00% of its value. |
(i) | For purposes of this presentation, the components include the market value of securities, and reflect the impact of the equivalent exposure of derivative positions, if applicable. These amounts may be negative from time to time. The bond component will include any accrued interest amounts. Equivalent exposure is a calculated amount that translates the derivative position into a reasonable approximation of the amount of the underlying asset that the portfolio would have to hold at a given point in time to have the same price sensitivity that results from the portfolios ownership of the derivative contract. When dealing with derivatives, equivalent exposure is a more representative measure of the potential impact of a position on portfolio performance than market value. |
(j) | For the purpose of managing the funds duration, the fund holds short treasury futures with a bond equivalent exposure of (11.8)%, which reduce the funds interest exposure but not its credit exposure. |
(m) | In determining an instruments effective maturity for purposes of calculating the funds dollar-weighted average effective maturity, MFS uses the instruments stated maturity or, if applicable, an earlier date on which MFS believes it is probable that a maturity-shortening device (such as a put, pre-refunding or prepayment) will cause the instrument to be repaid. Such an earlier date can be substantially shorter than the instruments stated maturity. |
From time to time Cash & Other Net Assets may be negative due to borrowings for leverage transactions, timing of cash receipts, and/or equivalent exposure from any derivative holdings.
Percentages are based on net assets, including the value of auction preferred shares, as of 5/31/10, unless otherwise noted.
The portfolio is actively managed and current holdings may be different.
3
After having suffered through one of the largest and most concentrated downturns since the 1930s, most asset markets staged a remarkable rebound during 2009 and early 2010. This recovery in global activity, which covers this reporting period, has been led importantly by emerging Asian economies, but broadening to include most of the global economy to varying degrees. Primary drivers of the recovery included an unwinding of the inventory destocking that took place earlier, the production of manufacturing and capital goods, as well as massive fiscal and monetary stimulus.
During the worst of the credit crisis, policy makers globally loosened monetary and fiscal policy on a massive scale. Having reached their lower bound on policy rates prior to the beginning of the reporting period, several central banks were implementing quantitative easing as a means to further loosen monetary policy to offset the continuing fall in global economic activity. However, by the beginning of the period, there were ever-broadening signs that the global macroeconomic deterioration had passed, which caused the subsequent rise in asset valuations. As most asset prices rebounded during the period and the demand for liquidity waned, the debate concerning the existence of asset bubbles and the need for monetary exit strategies had begun, creating added uncertainty regarding the forward path of policy rates. Late in the period, though, heightened risk surrounding the public-debt profiles of several of the peripheral European countries caused risky asset valuations to retrench considerably.
Headline risk will likely continue to be a source of volatility in the municipal bond market as issuers prepare and finalize their 2011 fiscal year budgets. Heightened sensitivity to sovereign risk issues has exacerbated the markets concerns about the state of municipal finance, giving rise to comparisons to peripheral European issuers that we feel divert investor attention from the fundamental solvency and sustainability of the majority of municipal issuers. We think it will take time for spending cuts to catch up with reduced revenue and for deficits to abate, and we recognize the challenges posed by unfunded liabilities, exhaustion of Federal stimulus monies, and a variety of other factors. Nevertheless, we feel that municipal bond issuers revenues are beginning to stabilize.
4
INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE, PRINCIPAL
INVESTMENT STRATEGIES AND RISKS
OF THE FUND
Investment Objective
The funds investment objective is to seek high current income exempt from federal income tax, but may also consider capital appreciation. The funds objective may be changed without shareholder approval.
Principal Investment Strategies
The fund invests, under normal market conditions, at least 80% of its net assets, including assets attributable to preferred shares and borrowings for investment purposes, in tax-exempt bonds and tax-exempt notes. This policy may not be changed without shareholder approval. Tax-exempt bonds and tax-exempt notes are municipal instruments, the interest of which is exempt from federal income tax. Interest from the funds investments may be subject to the federal alternative minimum tax. MFS may also invest in taxable instruments.
MFS normally invests at least 80% of the funds net assets, including assets attributable to preferred shares and borrowings for investment purposes, in investment grade debt instruments. Investment grade debt instruments are those that are rated at the time of purchase in one of the top four rating categories by Moodys; or if not rated by Moodys, by S&P; or if not rated by Moodys or S&P, by Fitch. If a debt instrument is unrated, MFS may assign a rating which it considers to be equivalent to that of a major credit rating.
MFS may also invest in lower quality debt instruments.
MFS may invest 25% or more of the funds total assets in municipal instruments that finance similar projects, such as those relating to education, healthcare, housing, utilities, water, or sewers.
MFS may invest a relatively high percentage of the funds assets in the debt instruments of a single issuer or a small number of issuers.
MFS may use derivatives for different purposes, including to earn income and enhance returns, to increase or decrease exposure to a particular market, to manage or adjust the risk profile of the fund, or as alternatives to direct investments.
MFS uses a bottom-up investment approach in buying and selling investments for the fund. Investments are selected primarily based on fundamental analysis of instruments and their issuers in light of current market, economic, political, and regulatory conditions. Factors considered may include the instruments credit quality, collateral characteristics, and indenture provisions, and the issuers management ability, capital structure, leverage, and ability to meet its current obligations. Quantitative analysis of the structure of the instrument and its features may also be considered.
The fund uses leverage through the issuance of preferred shares and/or the creation of tender option bonds, and then investing the proceeds pursuant to
5
Investment Objective, Principal Investment Strategies and Risks of the Fund continued
its investment strategies. If approved by the funds Board of Trustees, the fund may use leverage by other methods.
MFS may engage in active and frequent trading in pursuing the funds principal investment strategies.
In response to market, economic, political, or other conditions, MFS may depart from the funds principal investment strategies by temporarily investing for defensive purposes.
Principal Risks
The portfolios yield and share prices change daily based on the credit quality of its investments and changes in interest rates. In general, the value of debt securities will decline when interest rates rise and will increase when interest rates fall. Debt securities with longer maturity dates will generally be subject to greater price fluctuations than those with shorter maturities. Municipal instruments can be volatile and significantly affected by adverse tax or court rulings, legislative or political changes and the financial condition of the issuers and/or insurers of municipal instruments. If the Internal Revenue Service determines an issuer of a municipal security has not complied with applicable tax requirements, interest from the security could become taxable and the security could decline significantly in value. Derivatives can be highly volatile and involve risks in addition to those of the underlying indicators upon whose value the derivative is based. Gains or losses from derivatives can be substantially greater than the derivatives original cost. Lower quality debt securities involve substantially greater risk of default and their value can decline significantly over time. To the extent that investments are purchased with the proceeds from the issuance of preferred shares, the funds net asset value will increase or decrease at a greater rate than a comparable unleveraged fund. To the extent that the fund participates in the creation of tender option bonds, it will hold more concentrated positions in individual securities and so its performance may be more volatile than the performance of more diversified funds. A tender option bond issue may terminate upon the occurrence of certain enumerated events, which would result in a reduction in the funds leverage. In connection with the creation of tender option bonds and for other investment purposes, the fund may invest in inverse floating rate instruments, whose potential income return is inversely related to changes in a floating interest rate. Inverse floating rate instruments may provide investment leverage and be more volatile than other debt instruments. When you sell your shares, they may be worth more or less than the amount you paid for them. Please see the funds registration statement for further information regarding these and other risk considerations. A copy of the funds registration statement on Form N-2 is available on the EDGAR database on the Securities and Exchange Commissions Internet Web site at http://sec.gov and on the MFS Web site at mfs.com.
In accordance with Section 23(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, the fund hereby gives notice that it may from time to time repurchase common and/or preferred shares of the fund in the open market at the option of the Board of Trustees and on such terms as the Trustees shall determine.
6
Michael Dawson | | Investment Officer of MFS; employed in the investment area of MFS since 1998. Portfolio Manager of the fund since June 2007. | ||
Geoffrey Schechter | | Investment Officer of MFS; employed in the investment area of MFS since 1993. Portfolio Manager of the fund since June 2007. |
The funds shares may trade at a discount or premium to net asset value. Shareholders do not have the right to cause the fund to repurchase their shares at net asset value. When fund shares trade at a premium, buyers pay more than the net asset value underlying fund shares, and shares purchased at a premium would receive less than the amount paid for them in the event of the funds liquidation. As a result, the total return that is calculated based on the net asset value and New York Stock Exchange price can be different.
7
CASH PURCHASE PLAN
The fund offers a Dividend Reinvestment and Cash Purchase Plan (the Plan) that allows common shareholders to reinvest either all of the distributions paid by the fund or only the long-term capital gains. Generally, purchases are made at the market price unless that price exceeds the net asset value (the shares are trading at a premium). If the shares are trading at a premium, purchases will be made at a price of either the net asset value or 95% of the market price, whichever is greater. You can also buy shares on a quarterly basis in any amount $100 and over. The Plan Agent will purchase shares under the Cash Purchase Plan on the 15th of January, April, July, and October or shortly thereafter.
If shares are registered in your own name, new shareholders will automatically participate in the Plan, unless you have indicated that you do not wish to participate. If your shares are in the name of a brokerage firm, bank, or other nominee, you can ask the firm or nominee to participate in the Plan on your behalf. If the nominee does not offer the Plan, you may wish to request that your shares be re-registered in your own name so that you can participate. There is no service charge to reinvest distributions, nor are there brokerage charges for shares issued directly by the fund. However, when shares are bought on the New York Stock Exchange or otherwise on the open market, each participant pays a pro rata share of the transaction expenses, including commissions. Dividends and capital gains distributions are taxable whether received in cash or reinvested in additional shares the automatic reinvestment of distributions does not relieve you of any income tax that may be payable (or required to be withheld) on the distributions.
You may withdraw from the Plan at any time by going to the Plan Agents website at www.computershare.com, by calling 1-800-637-2304 any business day from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. Eastern time or by writing to the Plan Agent at P.O. Box 43078, Providence, RI 02940-3078. Please have available the name of the fund and your account number. For certain types of registrations, such as corporate accounts, instructions must be submitted in writing. Please call for additional details. When you withdraw from the Plan, you can receive the value of the reinvested shares in one of three ways: your full shares will be held in your account, the Plan Agent will sell your shares and send the proceeds to you, or you may transfer your full shares to your investment professional who can hold or sell them. Additionally, the Plan Agent will sell your fractional shares and send the proceeds to you.
If you have any questions or for further information or a copy of the Plan, contact the Plan Agent Computershare Trust Company, N.A. (the Transfer Agent for the fund) at 1-800-637-2304, at the Plan Agents website at www.computershare.com, or by writing to the Plan Agent at P.O. Box 43078, Providence, RI 02940-3078.
8
5/31/10 (unaudited)
The Portfolio of Investments is a complete list of all securities owned by your fund. It is categorized by broad-based asset classes.
Municipal Bonds - 147.4% | ||||||
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||
Airport & Port Revenue - 0.1% | ||||||
Maryland Economic Development Corp. Rev. (Terminal Project), B, 5.75%, 2035 | $ | 150,000 | $ | 152,393 | ||
General Obligations - General Purpose - 4.3% | ||||||
Chicago, IL (Emergency Telecommunications Systems), FGIC, 5.5%, 2023 | $ | 1,000,000 | $ | 1,143,900 | ||
Chicago, IL, A, AMBAC, 6.25%, 2014 | 1,480,000 | 1,701,068 | ||||
Highlands Ranch, CO, Metropolitan District, AGM, 6.5%, 2011 | 650,000 | 690,846 | ||||
Highlands Ranch, CO, Metropolitan District, ETM, AGM, 6.5%, 2011 (c) | 725,000 | 771,030 | ||||
Luzerne County, PA, AGM, 6.75%, 2023 | 370,000 | 399,929 | ||||
State of California, 5.75%, 2019 | 70,000 | 70,666 | ||||
$ | 4,777,439 | |||||
General Obligations - Schools - 6.6% | ||||||
Beverly Hills, CA, Unified School District, Capital Appreciation (Election of 2008), 0%, 2031 | $ | 130,000 | $ | 42,974 | ||
Beverly Hills, CA, Unified School District, Capital Appreciation (Election of 2008), 0%, 2032 | 235,000 | 72,620 | ||||
Beverly Hills, CA, Unified School District, Capital Appreciation (Election of 2008), 0%, 2033 | 470,000 | 136,197 | ||||
Frenship, TX, Independent School District, AGM, 5%, 2033 | 1,000,000 | 1,035,010 | ||||
Los Angeles, CA, Unified School District, D, 5%, 2034 | 95,000 | 96,591 | ||||
Modesto, CA, High School District (Stanislaus County), Capital Appreciation, A, FGIC, 0%, 2019 | 1,350,000 | 879,701 | ||||
Pomona, CA, Unified School District, A, NATL, 6.45%, 2022 | 1,000,000 | 1,162,790 | ||||
San Lorenzo, CA, Unified School District, Alameda County, Election 2004, B, FGIC, 4.75%, 2037 | 640,000 | 642,662 | ||||
St. Johns, MI, Public Schools, FGIC, 5.1%, 2025 | 1,000,000 | 1,159,410 | ||||
West Contra Costa, CA, Unified School District, B, NATL, 6%, 2024 | 250,000 | 269,178 | ||||
Will County, IL, School District (Channahon), AMBAC, 8.5%, 2015 | 1,400,000 | 1,795,556 | ||||
$ | 7,292,689 | |||||
Healthcare Revenue - Hospitals - 27.6% | ||||||
Allegheny County, PA, Hospital Development Authority Rev. (West Penn Allegheny Health), A, 5.375%, 2040 | $ | 405,000 | $ | 319,176 | ||
Birmingham, AL, Baptist Medical Center, Special Care Facilities Rev. (Baptist Health Systems, Inc.), A, 5%, 2030 | 485,000 | 425,689 |
9
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||
Healthcare Revenue - Hospitals - continued | ||||||
Brunswick, GA, Hospital Authority Rev. (Glynn-Brunswick Memorial Hospital), 5.625%, 2034 | $ | 165,000 | $ | 171,268 | ||
California Health Facilities Financing Authority Rev. (Catholic Healthcare West), I, 4.95%, 2026 (b) | 200,000 | 217,746 | ||||
California Health Facilities Financing Authority Rev. (St. Joseph Health System), A, 5.75%, 2039 | 195,000 | 203,533 | ||||
California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev. (Childrens Hospital), 5%, 2047 | 575,000 | 460,564 | ||||
California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev. (Enloe Medical Center), CHCLI, 5.75%, 2038 | 360,000 | 361,364 | ||||
California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev. (St. Joseph Health System), FGIC, 5.75%, 2047 |
255,000 | 258,685 | ||||
Cullman County, AL, Health Care Authority (Cullman Regional Medical Center), A, 6.75%, 2029 | 355,000 | 366,214 | ||||
District of Columbia Hospital Rev. (Childrens Hospital Obligated Group), AGM, 5.25%, 2045 | 265,000 | 266,200 | ||||
Harris County, TX, Health Facilities Development Corp., Hospital Rev. (Memorial Hermann Healthcare Systems), B, 7%, 2027 | 205,000 | 232,033 | ||||
Harris County, TX, Health Facilities Development Corp., Hospital Rev. (Memorial Hermann Healthcare Systems), B, 7.25%, 2035 | 250,000 | 284,095 | ||||
Health Care Authority for Baptist Health, AL, D, 5%, 2021 | 850,000 | 814,623 | ||||
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Childrens Memorial Hospital), A, ASSD GTY, 5.25%, 2047 | 540,000 | 539,077 | ||||
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Edward Hospital), A, AMBAC, 5.5%, 2040 | 470,000 | 473,173 | ||||
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (KishHealth Systems Obligated Group), 5.75%, 2028 | 380,000 | 392,137 | ||||
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Provena Health), A, 7.75%, 2034 | 400,000 | 459,576 | ||||
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Resurrection Health), 6.125%, 2025 | 460,000 | 474,840 | ||||
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Silver Cross Hospital & Medical Centers), 6.875%, 2038 | 395,000 | 413,431 | ||||
Indiana Health & Educational Facilities Finance Authority, Hospital Rev. (Clarian Health), A, 5%, 2039 | 390,000 | 365,723 | ||||
Indiana Health & Educational Facilities Finance Authority, Hospital Rev. (Community Foundation of Northwest Indiana), 5.5%, 2037 | 705,000 | 698,211 | ||||
Indiana Health & Educational Financing Authority Rev. (Community Foundation of Northwest Indiana ), A, 6%, 2034 | 150,000 | 153,636 | ||||
Johnson City, TN, Health & Educational Facilities Board Hospital Rev. (Mountain States Health Alliance), A, 5.5%, 2036 | 845,000 | 817,698 | ||||
Kentucky Economic Development Finance Authority, Hospital Facilities Rev. (Baptist Healthcare System), A, 5.375%, 2024 | 255,000 | 276,841 |
10
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||
Healthcare Revenue - Hospitals - continued | ||||||
Kentucky Economic Development Finance Authority, Hospital Facilities Rev. (Baptist Healthcare System), A, 5.625%, 2027 | $ | 85,000 | $ | 92,333 | ||
Kentucky Economic Development Finance Authority, Hospital Facilities Rev. (Owensboro Medical Health System), A, 6.375%, 2040 | 440,000 | 451,968 | ||||
Lake County, OH, Hospital Facilities Rev. (Lake Hospital), C, 6%, 2043 | 265,000 | 269,179 | ||||
Louisiana Public Facilities Authority Hospital Rev. (Lake Charles Memorial Hospital), 6.375%, 2034 | 415,000 | 392,217 | ||||
Louisville & Jefferson County, KY, Metropolitan Government Healthcare Systems Rev. (Norton Healthcare, Inc.), 5.25%, 2036 | 385,000 | 376,903 | ||||
Lufkin, TX, Health Facilities Development Corp. Rev. (Memorial Health System), 5.5%, 2032 | 45,000 | 42,027 | ||||
Lufkin, TX, Health Facilities Development Corp. Rev. (Memorial Health System), 5.5%, 2037 | 45,000 | 41,404 | ||||
Maryland Health & Higher Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Anne Arundel Health System), A, 6.75%, 2039 | 175,000 | 200,975 | ||||
Maryland Health & Higher Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Mercy Medical Center), A, 5.5%, 2042 | 300,000 | 292,056 | ||||
Maryland Health & Higher Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Washington County Hospital), 6%, 2043 | 95,000 | 96,378 | ||||
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Boston Medical Center), 5.25%, 2038 | 110,000 | 97,771 | ||||
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Milford-Whitinsville Regional), C, 5.75%, 2013 | 355,000 | 355,440 | ||||
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Quincy Medical Center), A, 6.5%, 2038 | 165,000 | 145,862 | ||||
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (South Shore Hospital), F, 5.75%, 2029 | 370,000 | 376,360 | ||||
New Hampshire Business Finance Authority Rev. (Elliot Hospital Obligated Group), A, 6%, 2027 | 445,000 | 456,454 | ||||
New Hampshire Health & Education Facilities Authority Rev. (Catholic Medical Center), A, 6.125%, 2012 (c) | 440,000 | 492,703 | ||||
New Hampshire Health & Education Facilities Authority Rev. (Catholic Medical Center), A, 6.125%, 2032 | 60,000 | 60,544 | ||||
New Hampshire Health & Education Facilities Authority Rev. (Memorial Hospital at Conway), 5.25%, 2036 | 300,000 | 264,132 | ||||
New Jersey Health Care Facilities, Financing Authority Rev. (St. Peters University Hospital), 5.75%, 2037 |
415,000 | 419,245 | ||||
New York Dormitory Authority Rev. (North Shore Long Island Jewish Group), 5.5%, 2013 (c) | 100,000 | 113,435 |
11
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||
Healthcare Revenue - Hospitals - continued | ||||||
New York Dormitory Authority Rev., Non-State Supported Debt (Bronx-Lebanon Hospital Center), LOC, 6.5%, 2030 | $ | 165,000 | $ | 184,495 | ||
New York Dormitory Authority Rev., Non-State Supported Debt (Bronx-Lebanon Hospital Center), LOC, 6.25%, 2035 | 100,000 | 109,832 | ||||
New York Dormitory Authority Rev., Non-State Supported Debt (Mt. Sinai NYU Health), 5.5%, 2026 |
200,000 | 200,492 | ||||
Northampton County, PA, General Purpose Authority Hospital Rev. (St. Lukes Hospital), A, 5.5%, 2035 | 100,000 | 99,721 | ||||
Northampton County, PA, General Purpose Authority Hospital Rev. (St. Lukes Hospital), A, 5.5%, 2040 | 115,000 | 113,986 | ||||
Orange County, FL, Health Facilities Authority Hospital Rev. (Orlando Regional Healthcare), 5.75%, 2012 (c) | 150,000 | 168,261 | ||||
Orange County, FL, Health Facilities Authority Hospital Rev. (Orlando Regional Healthcare), C, ETM, NATL, 6.25%, 2013 (c) | 1,740,000 | 2,011,562 | ||||
Palomar Pomerado Health Care District, CA, COP, 6.75%, 2039 | 340,000 | 363,661 | ||||
Philadelphia, PA, Hospitals & Higher Education Facilities Authority Rev. (Temple University Health System), A, 6.625%, 2023 | 335,000 | 335,067 | ||||
Philadelphia, PA, Hospitals & Higher Education Facilities Authority Rev. (Temple University Health System), A, 5.5%, 2030 | 395,000 | 354,291 | ||||
Rhode Island Health & Educational Building Corp. Rev., Hospital Financing (Lifespan Obligated Group), A, ASSD GTY, 7%, 2039 | 855,000 | 968,570 | ||||
Rhode Island Health & Educational Building Corp., Hospital Financing (Lifespan Obligated Group), 6.375%, 2012 (c) | 435,000 | 476,864 | ||||
Richmond, IN, Hospital Authority Rev. (Reid Hospital & Health Center Services), A, 6.625%, 2039 | 525,000 | 567,163 | ||||
Royal Oak, MI, Hospital Finance Authority Rev. (William Beaumont Hospital), 8.25%, 2039 | 230,000 | 274,645 | ||||
Scioto County, OH, Hospital Facilities Rev. (Southern Ohio Medical Center), 5.75%, 2038 | 555,000 | 569,164 | ||||
Skagit County, WA, Public Hospital District No. 001 Rev. (Skagit Valley Hospital), 5.75%, 2032 | 535,000 | 527,039 | ||||
South Carolina Jobs & Economic Development Authority (Bon Secours - Venice Healthcare Corp.), 5.5%, 2012 (c) | 110,000 | 122,064 | ||||
South Carolina Jobs & Economic Development Authority (Bon Secours - Venice Healthcare Corp.), 5.5%, 2023 | 390,000 | 394,524 | ||||
South Lake County, FL, Hospital District Rev. (South Lake Hospital), A, 6%, 2029 | 105,000 | 107,884 | ||||
South Lake County, FL, Hospital District Rev. (South Lake Hospital), A, 6.25%, 2039 | 155,000 | 159,320 | ||||
Southwestern, IL, Development Authority Rev. (Anderson Hospital), 5.375%, 2015 | 380,000 | 381,919 |
12
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||
Healthcare Revenue - Hospitals - continued | ||||||
Southwestern, IL, Development Authority Rev. (Anderson Hospital), 5.125%, 2036 | $ | 1,000,000 | $ | 898,410 | ||
St. Paul, MN, Housing & Redevelopment Authority Healthcare Facilities Rev. (Healthpartners Obligated Group), 5.25%, 2023 | 325,000 | 327,464 | ||||
St. Paul, MN, Housing & Redevelopment Authority Healthcare Facilities Rev. (Healthpartners Obligated Group), 5.25%, 2036 | 615,000 | 580,099 | ||||
Sullivan County, TN, Health, Educational & Housing Facilities Board Hospital Rev. (Wellmont Health Systems Project), C, 5.25%, 2026 | 1,365,000 | 1,292,054 | ||||
Sullivan County, TN, Health, Educational & Housing Facilities Board Hospital Rev. (Wellmont Health Systems Project), C, 5.25%, 2036 | 135,000 | 120,546 | ||||
Sumner County, TN, Health, Educational & Housing Facilities Board Rev. (Sumner Regional Health Systems, Inc.), A, 5.5%, 2046 | 1,000,000 | 860,000 | ||||
Tarrant County, TX, Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp. (Scott & White Memorial Hospital), A, 5.5%, 2031 | 85,000 | 90,052 | ||||
Tyler, TX, Health Facilities Development Corp. (East Texas Medical Center), A, 5.25%, 2032 | 265,000 | 248,726 | ||||
Tyler, TX, Health Facilities Development Corp. (East Texas Medical Center), A, 5.375%, 2037 | 220,000 | 206,087 | ||||
Washington Health Care Facilities Authority Rev. (Highline Medical Center), FHA, 6.25%, 2036 | 700,000 | 763,868 | ||||
Washington Health Care Facilities Authority Rev. (Virginia Mason Medical Center), A, 6.25%, 2042 | 570,000 | 586,553 | ||||
West Virginia Hospital Finance Authority, Hospital Rev. (Thomas Health System), 6.5%, 2038 | 285,000 | 273,249 | ||||
Wisconsin Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Aurora Health Care, Inc.), 6.4%, 2033 | 175,000 | 179,389 | ||||
Wisconsin Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Fort Healthcare, Inc. Project), 5.375%, 2018 | 385,000 | 394,032 | ||||
Wisconsin Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (ProHealth Care, Inc. Obligated Group), 6.625%, 2032 | 195,000 | 204,157 | ||||
Wisconsin Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (ProHealth Care, Inc. Obligated Group), 6.625%, 2039 | 100,000 | 108,694 | ||||
Wisconsin Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Wheaton Franciscan Services), 5.25%, 2034 | 695,000 | 616,708 | ||||
$ | 30,723,531 | |||||
Healthcare Revenue - Long Term Care - 7.6% | ||||||
ABAG Finance Authority for Non-Profit Corps., CA, Rev. (Casa de las Campanas), 6%, 2037 | $ | 70,000 | $ | 70,745 | ||
Abilene, TX, Health Facilities Development Corp., Retirement Facilities Rev. (Sears Methodist Retirement Systems, Inc.), A, 7%, 2033 | 500,000 | 442,615 | ||||
Bucks County, PA, Industrial Development Authority Retirement Community Rev. (Anns Choice, Inc.), A, 6.125%, 2025 | 500,000 | 472,145 |
13
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||
Healthcare Revenue - Long Term Care - continued | ||||||
Capital Projects Finance Authority, FL (Glenridge on Palmer Ranch), A, 8%, 2012 (c) | $ | 500,000 | $ | 574,095 | ||
Chartiers Valley, PA, Industrial & Commercial Development Authority Rev. (Friendship Village South), A, 5.25%, 2013 | 500,000 | 519,330 | ||||
Chester County, PA, Industrial Development Authority Rev. (RHA Nursing Home), 8.5%, 2032 | 705,000 | 635,057 | ||||
Cumberland County, PA, Municipal Authority Rev. (Diakon Lutheran Social Ministries), 6.125%, 2029 | 570,000 | 578,123 | ||||
Fulton County, GA, Residential Care Facilities, Elderly Authority Rev. (Canterbury Court), A, 6.125%, 2034 | 250,000 | 224,573 | ||||
Fulton County, GA, Residential Care Facilities, Elderly Authority Rev. (Lenbrook Square Foundation, Inc.), A, 5%, 2029 | 270,000 | 190,995 | ||||
Hamden, CT, Facility Rev. (Whitney Center Project), A, 7.625%, 2030 | 35,000 | 36,504 | ||||
Hamden, CT, Facility Rev. (Whitney Center Project), A, 7.75%, 2043 | 205,000 | 213,833 | ||||
Hawaii Department of Budget & Finance, Special Purpose Rev. (15 Craigside Project), A, 9%, 2044 | 115,000 | 128,923 | ||||
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Hoosier Care, Inc.), A, 7.125%, 2034 | 420,000 | 362,036 | ||||
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Smith Village), A, 6.25%, 2035 | 500,000 | 424,955 | ||||
Illinois Health Facilities Authority Rev. (Lutheran Senior Ministries, Inc.), 7.375%, 2011 (c) | 250,000 | 272,893 | ||||
Illinois Health Facilities Authority Rev. (Smith Crossing), A, 7%, 2032 | 250,000 | 229,933 | ||||
La Verne, CA, COP (Brethren Hillcrest Homes), B, 6.625%, 2025 | 350,000 | 350,165 | ||||
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency Rev. (Loomis Communities, Inc.), A, 5.625%, 2015 | 150,000 | 147,933 | ||||
Montgomery County, PA, Industrial Development Authority Rev. (Whitemarsh Continuing Care), 6.125%, 2028 | 200,000 | 162,562 | ||||
Montgomery County, PA, Industrial Development Authority Rev. (Whitemarsh Continuing Care), 6.25%, 2035 | 300,000 | 231,996 | ||||
New Jersey Economic Development Authority Rev. (Lions Gate), A, 5.75%, 2025 | 310,000 | 278,321 | ||||
New Jersey Economic Development Authority Rev. (Lions Gate), A, 5.875%, 2037 | 100,000 | 84,090 | ||||
Savannah, GA, Economic Development Authority, First Mortgage (Marshes of Skidway), A, 7.4%, 2024 | 250,000 | 250,463 | ||||
Shelby County, TN, Health, Educational & Housing Facilities Board Rev. (Germantown Village), A, 7.25%, 2034 | 150,000 | 146,643 | ||||
South Carolina Jobs & Economic Development Authority, Health Facilities Rev. (Wesley Commons), 5.3%, 2036 | 250,000 | 196,200 |
14
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||
Healthcare Revenue - Long Term Care - continued | ||||||
Suffolk County, NY, Industrial Development Agency, Civic Facilities Rev. (Gurwin Jewish Phase II), 6.7%, 2039 | $ | 490,000 | $ | 415,216 | ||
Tarrant County, TX, Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp. Retirement Facility (Air Force Village), 6.125%, 2029 | 40,000 | 40,155 | ||||
Tarrant County, TX, Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp. Retirement Facility (Air Force Village), 6.375%, 2044 | 315,000 | 314,332 | ||||
Tarrant County, TX, Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp. Retirement Facility (Stayton at Museum Way), 8.25%, 2044 | 500,000 | 499,395 | ||||
$ | 8,494,226 | |||||
Healthcare Revenue - Other - 0.3% | ||||||
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Civic Investments, Inc.), A, 9%, 2012 (c) | $ | 250,000 | $ | 290,203 | ||
Human Services - 0.2% | ||||||
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency Rev. (Evergreen Center, Inc.), 5%, 2024 | $ | 250,000 | $ | 232,038 | ||
Industrial Revenue - Airlines - 0.4% | ||||||
Clayton County, GA, Development Authority Special Facilities Rev. (Delta Airlines, Inc.), A, 8.75%, 2029 | $ | 125,000 | $ | 133,854 | ||
Clayton County, GA, Development Authority Special Facilities Rev. (Delta Airlines, Inc.), B, 9%, 2035 | 95,000 | 99,165 | ||||
Dallas Fort Worth, TX, International Airport Facility Improvement Corp. (American Airlines, Inc.), 5.5%, 2030 | 105,000 | 71,001 | ||||
New York, NY, City Industrial Development Agencies Rev. (American Airlines, Inc.), 7.5%, 2016 | 115,000 | 116,789 | ||||
$ | 420,809 | |||||
Industrial Revenue - Chemicals - 1.0% | ||||||
Brazos River, TX, Harbor Navigation District (Dow Chemical Co.), B-2, 4.95%, 2033 | $ | 590,000 | $ | 560,500 | ||
Michigan Strategic Fund Ltd. Obligation Rev. (Dow Chemical Co.), 6.25%, 2014 | 525,000 | 586,472 | ||||
$ | 1,146,972 | |||||
Industrial Revenue - Environmental Services - 1.3% | ||||||
California Pollution Control Financing Authority, Solid Waste Disposal Rev. (Republic Services, Inc.), B, 5.25%, 2023 (b) | $ | 135,000 | $ | 140,684 | ||
California Pollution Control Financing Authority, Solid Waste Disposal Rev. (Waste Management, Inc.), A, 5%, 2022 | 305,000 | 303,926 | ||||
California Pollution Control Financing Authority, Solid Waste Disposal Rev. (Waste Management, Inc.), C, 5.125%, 2023 | 335,000 | 333,539 |
15
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||
Industrial Revenue - Environmental Services - continued | ||||||
Mission, TX, Economic Development Corp., Solid Waste Disposal Rev. (Allied Waste N.A., Inc.), A, 5.2%, 2018 | $ | 650,000 | $ | 652,984 | ||
$ | 1,431,133 | |||||
Industrial Revenue - Other - 2.5% | ||||||
California Statewide Communities, Development Authority Facilities (Microgy Holdings Project), 9%, 2038 (a) | $ | 26,773 | $ | 2,677 | ||
Gulf Coast, TX, Industrial Development Authority Rev. (CITGO Petroleum Corp.), 8%, 2028 | 250,000 | 250,585 | ||||
Houston, TX, Industrial Development Corp. (United Parcel Service, Inc.), 6%, 2023 | 315,000 | 302,772 | ||||
Indianapolis, IN, Airport Authority Rev., Special Facilities (FedEx Corp.), 5.1%, 2017 | 250,000 | 262,428 | ||||
Michigan Strategic Fund Ltd. Obligation Rev. (Michigan Sugar Co., Carrollton), 6.55%, 2025 | 250,000 | 214,835 | ||||
New Jersey Economic Development Authority Rev. (GMT Realty LLC), B, 6.875%, 2037 | 500,000 | 409,035 | ||||
Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority, Finance Authority Facilities Rev. (Amtrak), A, 6.25%, 2031 | 180,000 | 182,830 | ||||
Toledo Lucas County, OH, Authority Port Rev., Facilities (CSX, Inc. Project), 6.45%, 2021 | 1,000,000 | 1,124,030 | ||||
$ | 2,749,192 | |||||
Industrial Revenue - Paper - 1.1% | ||||||
Camden, AL, Industrial Development Board Exempt Facilities Rev., B (Weyerhaeuser Co.), 6.375%, 2013 (c) | $ | 275,000 | $ | 318,843 | ||
Escambia County, FL, Environmental Improvement Rev. (International Paper Co.), A, 5.75%, 2027 | 250,000 | 242,240 | ||||
Rockdale County, GA, Development Authority Project Rev. (Visy Paper Project), A, 6.125%, 2034 | 320,000 | 297,965 | ||||
Sabine River Authority Rev., Louisiana Water Facilities (International Paper Co.), 6.2%, 2025 | 310,000 | 314,858 | ||||
$ | 1,173,906 | |||||
Miscellaneous Revenue - Entertainment & Tourism - 0.9% | ||||||
Brooklyn, NY, Arena Local Development Corp. (Barclays Center Project), 6%, 2030 | $ | 200,000 | $ | 206,356 | ||
Brooklyn, NY, Arena Local Development Corp. (Barclays Center Project), 6.25%, 2040 | 130,000 | 133,901 | ||||
Brooklyn, NY, Arena Local Development Corp. (Barclays Center Project), 6.375%, 2043 | 90,000 | 92,718 | ||||
Cow Creek Band of Umpqua Tribe of Indians, OR, C, 5.625%, 2026 (n) | 350,000 | 259,004 |
16
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||
Miscellaneous Revenue - Entertainment & Tourism - continued | ||||||
New York Liberty Development Corp. Rev. (National Sports Museum), A, 6.125%, 2019 (d) | $ | 220,000 | $ | 660 | ||
New York, NY, City Industrial Development Agency Rev. (Queens Baseball Stadium), ASSD GTY, 6.125%, 2029 | 65,000 | 72,690 | ||||
New York, NY, City Industrial Development Agency Rev. (Queens Baseball Stadium), ASSD GTY, 6.375%, 2039 | 45,000 | 49,734 | ||||
New York, NY, City Industrial Development Agency Rev. (Queens Baseball Stadium), ASSD GTY, 6.5%, 2046 | 195,000 | 217,205 | ||||
$ | 1,032,268 | |||||
Miscellaneous Revenue - Other - 2.0% | ||||||
Austin, TX, Convention Center (Convention Enterprises, Inc.), A, SYNCORA, 5.25%, 2017 | $ | 95,000 | $ | 93,034 | ||
Austin, TX, Convention Center (Convention Enterprises, Inc.), A, SYNCORA, 5.25%, 2019 | 190,000 | 181,401 | ||||
Austin, TX, Convention Center (Convention Enterprises, Inc.), A, SYNCORA, 5.25%, 2020 | 155,000 | 146,292 | ||||
Austin, TX, Convention Center (Convention Enterprises, Inc.), A, SYNCORA, 5.25%, 2024 | 90,000 | 82,845 | ||||
Dallas, TX, Civic Center Convention Complex Rev., ASSD GTY, 5.25%, 2034 | 465,000 | 482,833 | ||||
New Orleans, LA, Aviation Board Gulf Opportunity Zone CFC Rev. (Consolidated Rental Car), A, 6.25%, 2030 | 185,000 | 192,709 | ||||
Oklahoma Industries Authority Rev. (Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation Project), 5.5%, 2029 | 600,000 | 625,782 | ||||
Summit County, OH, Port Authority Building Rev. (Seville Project), A, 5.1%, 2025 | 415,000 | 355,335 | ||||
V Lakes Utility District, MS, Water Systems Rev., 7%, 2037 | 85,000 | 75,291 | ||||
$ | 2,235,522 | |||||
Multi-Family Housing Revenue - 4.7% | ||||||
Broward County, FL, Housing Finance Authority Rev. (Chaves Lakes Apartments Ltd.), A, 7.5%, 2040 | $ | 500,000 | $ | 485,845 | ||
Capital Trust Agency, FL, Housing Rev. (Atlantic Housing Foundation), B, 7%, 2032 | 355,000 | 150,449 | ||||
Charter Mac Equity Issuer Trust, FHLMC, 6.3%, 2019 (n) | 500,000 | 523,990 | ||||
Charter Mac Equity Issuer Trust, B, FHLMC, 7.6%, 2050 (b)(n) | 500,000 | 516,850 | ||||
Clay County, FL, Housing Finance Authority Rev. (Madison Commons Apartments), A, 7.45%, 2040 | 235,000 | 222,637 | ||||
District of Columbia Housing Finance Agency (Henson Ridge), E, FHA, 5.1%, 2037 | 500,000 | 492,790 | ||||
Durham, NC, Durham Housing Authority Rev. (Magnolia Pointe Apartments), 5.65%, 2038 (b) | 370,988 | 294,824 |
17
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||
Multi-Family Housing Revenue - continued | ||||||
Minneapolis, MN, Student Housing Rev. (Riverton Community Housing Project), A, 5.7%, 2040 | $ | 250,000 | $ | 195,995 | ||
MuniMae TE Bond Subsidiary LLC, 5.5%, 2049 (b)(z) | 1,000,000 | 634,240 | ||||
New Mexico Mortgage Finance Authority, Multi-Family Housing Rev. (Sun Pointe Apartments), E, FHA, 4.8%, 2040 | 500,000 | 483,695 | ||||
Resolution Trust Corp., Pass-Through Certificates, 1993, 9.75%, 2016 (z) | 227,741 | 216,192 | ||||
Tacoma, WA, Housing Authority Multi-Family Rev. (Redwood/Juniper, Pine Tree Harbor, & Conifer South), GNMA, 5.05%, 2037 | 1,040,000 | 1,011,379 | ||||
$ | 5,228,886 | |||||
Sales & Excise Tax Revenue - 1.4% | ||||||
Bolingbrook, IL, Sales Tax Rev., 6.25%, 2024 | $ | 250,000 | $ | 158,388 | ||
Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority, Sales Tax Rev., A-1, 5.25%, 2029 | 350,000 | 412,115 | ||||
Tampa Bay, FL, Sports Authority Rev. (Sales Tax-Tampa Bay Arena), NATL, 5.75%, 2025 | 1,000,000 | 1,041,950 | ||||
$ | 1,612,453 | |||||
Single Family Housing - Local - 0.8% | ||||||
Chicago, IL, Single Family Mortgage Rev., A, GNMA, 7.15%, 2031 | $ | 15,000 | $ | 15,595 | ||
Minneapolis & St. Paul Housing Authority Rev. (City Living), A-2, GNMA, 5%, 2038 | 404,190 | 398,151 | ||||
Pittsburgh, PA, Urban Redevelopment Authority Rev., C, GNMA, 4.8%, 2028 | 500,000 | 507,480 | ||||
$ | 921,226 | |||||
Single Family Housing - State - 2.8% | ||||||
California Housing Finance Agency Rev., G, 5.5%, 2042 | $ | 385,000 | $ | 389,123 | ||
Colorado Housing & Finance Authority, A, 5.5%, 2029 | 1,080,000 | 1,143,072 | ||||
Colorado Housing & Finance Authority, B-2, 7.25%, 2031 | 30,000 | 30,972 | ||||
Maine Housing Authority Mortgage, A-2, 4.95%, 2027 | 500,000 | 499,405 | ||||
Montana Board Housing (Single Family Mortgage), A, 5%, 2036 | 730,000 | 714,407 | ||||
North Dakota Housing Finance Agency Rev., A, 4.85%, 2021 | 310,000 | 313,915 | ||||
$ | 3,090,894 | |||||
Solid Waste Revenue - 1.8% | ||||||
Delaware County, PA, Industrial Development Authority Rev. (American Ref-Fuel), A, 6.1%, 2013 | $ | 675,000 | $ | 676,917 | ||
Massachusetts Industrial Finance Agency, Resource Recovery Rev. (Ogden Haverhill Associates), A, 5.45%, 2012 | 1,250,000 | 1,265,475 | ||||
Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority, Sewer Sludge Disposal Rev. (Philadelphia Biosolids Facility), 6.25%, 2032 | 55,000 | 58,500 | ||||
$ | 2,000,892 |
18
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||
State & Agency - Other - 0.2% | ||||||
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (Mepsi Campus), A, 6.25%, 2024 | $ | 100,000 | $ | 97,318 | ||
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (Mepsi Campus), A, 6.5%, 2037 | 100,000 | 92,566 | ||||
$ | 189,884 | |||||
State & Local Agencies - 17.8% | ||||||
Andover, MN, Economic Development Authority Public Facilities Lease Rev. (Andover Community Center), 5%, 2014 (j) | $ | 245,000 | $ | 270,725 | ||
Andover, MN, Economic Development Authority Public Facilities Lease Rev. (Andover Community Center), 5%, 2014 (j) | 355,000 | 392,275 | ||||
Berkeley County, SC, School District Installment Lease (Securing Assets for Education), 5%, 2028 | 500,000 | 506,870 | ||||
Dorchester County, SC, School District No. 2, Growth Remedy Opportunity Tax Hike, 5.25%, 2029 | 250,000 | 259,613 | ||||
Golden State, CA, Tobacco Securitization Corp., Tobacco Settlement Rev., Enhanced, A, 5%, 2045 | 420,000 | 378,311 | ||||
Golden State, CA, Tobacco Securitization Corp., Tobacco Settlement Rev., Enhanced, B, 5.5%, 2013 (c) | 500,000 | 563,365 | ||||
Indiana Office Building Commission Correction Facilities Program Rev. (Womens Prison), B, AMBAC, 6.25%, 2016 | 2,820,000 | 3,199,769 | ||||
Lancaster, SC, Educational Assistance Program, Inc., School District Lancaster County Project, 5%, 2026 | 550,000 | 558,393 | ||||
Laurens County, SC, School District No. 55, Installment Purchase Rev., 5.25%, 2030 | 350,000 | 333,130 | ||||
Los Angeles County, CA, Schools (Regionalized Business Service Corp.) Capital Appreciation Pooled Financing, A, AMBAC, 0%, 2021 | 2,135,000 | 1,071,877 | ||||
Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson County, TN, Health & Educational Facilities Board Rev. (Meharry Medical College), AMBAC, 6%, 2016 | 1,575,000 | 1,737,351 | ||||
New York Dormitory Authority Rev. (City University) A, 5.75%, 2018 | 5,000,000 | 5,708,700 | ||||
New York Urban Development Corp. Rev. (State Facilities), 5.6%, 2015 | 1,000,000 | 1,105,230 | ||||
Newberry, SC, Investing in Childrens Education (Newberry County School District Program), 5%, 2030 | 350,000 | 334,863 | ||||
Philadelphia, PA, Municipal Authority Rev., 6.5%, 2034 | 105,000 | 110,753 | ||||
Riverside, MO, Tax Increment Rev. (L-385 Levee Project), 5.25%, 2020 | 500,000 | 509,280 | ||||
St. Louis, MO, Industrial Development Authority Leasehold Rev. (Convention Center Hotel), AMBAC, 0%, 2018 | 300,000 | 172,572 | ||||
Utah Building Ownership Authority Lease Rev. (State Facilities Master Lease Program), C, AGM, 5.5%, 2019 | 1,750,000 | 2,034,358 |
19
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||
State & Local Agencies - continued | ||||||
West Virginia Building Commission, Lease Rev. (WV Regional Jail), A, AMBAC, 5.375%, 2018 | $ | 500,000 | $ | 550,375 | ||
$ | 19,797,810 | |||||
Student Loan Revenue - 0.4% | ||||||
Massachusetts Educational Financing Authority, Education Loan Rev., H, ASSD GTY, 6.35%, 2030 | $ | 445,000 | $ | 478,273 | ||
Tax - Other - 3.4% | ||||||
Dallas County, TX, Flood Control District, 7.25%, 2032 | $ | 500,000 | $ | 522,175 | ||
Dona Ana County, NM, Gross Receipts Tax Rev., AMBAC, 5.5%, 2015 | 1,000,000 | 1,044,740 | ||||
New York, NY, Transitional Finance Authority Rev., A, 5%, 2026 (f) | 1,960,000 | 2,054,746 | ||||
Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority Rev. (Diageo Project), A, 6.75%, 2037 | 160,000 | 175,528 | ||||
$ | 3,797,189 | |||||
Tax Assessment - 4.0% | ||||||
Atlanta, GA, Tax Allocation (Eastside Project), A, 5.625%, 2016 | $ | 300,000 | $ | 315,573 | ||
Celebration Community Development District, FL, A, 6.4%, 2034 | 220,000 | 222,099 | ||||
Chicago, IL, Tax Increment Allocation (Pilsen Redevelopment), B, 6.75%, 2022 | 610,000 | 585,362 | ||||
Du Page County, IL, Special Service Area (Monarch Landing Project), 5.4%, 2016 | 189,000 | 181,062 | ||||
Grand Bay at Doral Community Development District, FL, B, 6%, 2017 | 405,000 | 263,149 | ||||
Heritage Harbour North Community Development District, FL, Capital Improvement Rev., 6.375%, 2038 | 130,000 | 106,786 | ||||
Huntington Beach, CA, Community Facilities District, Special Tax (Grand Coast Resort), 2000-1, 6.45%, 2031 | 300,000 | 300,570 | ||||
Lincoln, CA, Special Tax (Community Facilities District ), 2003-1, 5.55%, 2013 (c) | 445,000 | 515,279 | ||||
Lincolnshire, IL, Special Service Area No. 1 (Sedgebrook Project), 6.25%, 2034 | 225,000 | 193,907 | ||||
Magnolia Park Community Development District, FL, Special Assessment, A, 6.15%, 2039 | 180,000 | 120,593 | ||||
Plano, IL, Special Service Area No. 4 (Lakewood Springs Project Unit 5-B), 6%, 2035 | 738,000 | 623,595 | ||||
Portage, IN, Economic Development Rev. (Ameriplex Project), 5%, 2027 | 105,000 | 94,968 | ||||
Seven Oaks, FL, Community Development District II Special Assessment Rev., A, 5.875%, 2035 | 455,000 | 257,198 | ||||
Tolomato Community Development District, FL, Special Assessment, 6.65%, 2040 | 100,000 | 82,891 |
20
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||
Tax Assessment - continued | ||||||
Volo Village, IL, Special Service Area No. 3, Special Tax (Symphony Meadows Project), 1, 6%, 2036 | $ | 250,000 | $ | 182,828 | ||
West Villages Improvement District, FL, Special Assessment Rev. (Unit of Development No. 3), 5.5%, 2037 (a) | 490,000 | 215,600 | ||||
Westridge, FL, Community Development District, Capital Improvement Rev., 5.8%, 2037 (d) | 480,000 | 197,995 | ||||
$ | 4,459,455 | |||||
Tobacco - 4.6% | ||||||
Badger, WI, Tobacco Asset Securitization Corp., 6.375%, 2012 (c) | $ | 250,000 | $ | 277,365 | ||
Buckeye, OH, Tobacco Settlement Financing Authority, A-2, 5.875%, 2030 | 480,000 | 388,013 | ||||
Buckeye, OH, Tobacco Settlement Financing Authority, A-2, 5.875%, 2047 | 1,405,000 | 999,236 | ||||
Buckeye, OH, Tobacco Settlement Financing Authority, A-2, 6.5%, 2047 | 635,000 | 501,129 | ||||
Golden State, CA, Tobacco Securitization Corp., Tobacco Settlement Rev., A-1, 6.25%, 2013 (c) | 555,000 | 619,424 | ||||
Inland Empire, CA, Tobacco Securitization Corp., Tobacco Settlement Rev., Asset Backed, Capital Appreciation, C-1, 0%, 2036 | 250,000 | 17,325 | ||||
Louisiana Tobacco Settlement Authority Rev., 2001-B, 5.875%, 2039 | 300,000 | 292,857 | ||||
Michigan Tobacco Settlement Finance Authority Rev., Asset Backed, A, 6%, 2048 | 1,380,000 | 1,025,989 | ||||
South Carolina Tobacco Settlement Authority Rev., B, 6.375%, 2011 (c) | 400,000 | 424,592 | ||||
Virginia Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp., B-1, 5%, 2047 | 105,000 | 69,087 | ||||
Washington Tobacco Settlement Authority Rev., 6.625%, 2032 | 460,000 | 464,020 | ||||
$ | 5,079,037 | |||||
Toll Roads - 2.6% | ||||||
Northwest Parkway, CO, Public Highway Authority (First Tier), D, 7.125%, 2011 (c) | $ | 490,000 | $ | 530,900 | ||
Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, Capital Appreciation, C, AGM, 0%, 2033 | 1,180,000 | 891,525 | ||||
San Joaquin Hills, CA, Transportation Corridor Agency Toll Road Rev., A, NATL, 0%, 2015 | 2,000,000 | 1,481,300 | ||||
$ | 2,903,725 | |||||
Transportation - Special Tax - 1.2% | ||||||
Regional Transportation Authority, IL, C, FGIC, 7.75%, 2020 | $ | 1,000,000 | $ | 1,285,560 |
21
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||
Universities - Colleges - 25.8% | ||||||
Anderson, IN, Economic Development Rev. (Anderson University Project), 5%, 2028 | $ | 225,000 | $ | 207,936 | ||
California Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (California Lutheran University), 5.75%, 2038 | 350,000 | 355,754 | ||||
California Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (University of Southern California), A, 5.25%, 2038 | 535,000 | 572,546 | ||||
California Municipal Finance Authority Rev. (Biola University), 5.8%, 2028 | 100,000 | 104,267 | ||||
California State University Rev., A, AMBAC, 5%, 2026 | 960,000 | 1,002,826 | ||||
District of Columbia Rev. (Georgetown University), BHAC, 0% to 2018, 5% to 2040 |
1,430,000 | 884,970 | ||||
Grand Valley, MI, State University Rev., 5.5%, 2027 | 115,000 | 122,814 | ||||
Grand Valley, MI, State University Rev., 5.625%, 2029 | 55,000 | 58,834 | ||||
Harris County, TX, Cultural Education Facilities Rev. (Baylor College of Medicine), D, 5.625%, 2032 | 490,000 | 463,442 | ||||
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Illinois Institute of Technology), A, 5%, 2031 | 335,000 | 306,213 | ||||
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Illinois Institute of Technology), A, 5%, 2036 | 335,000 | 300,967 | ||||
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Roosevelt University Project), 6.25%, 2029 | 545,000 | 567,203 | ||||
Illinois Finance Authority Rev. (Roosevelt University Project), 6.5%, 2039 | 125,000 | 128,593 | ||||
Lubbock, TX, Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Lubbock Christian University), 5.125%, 2027 | 285,000 | 278,727 | ||||
Lubbock, TX, Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Lubbock Christian University), 5.25%, 2037 | 255,000 | 235,850 | ||||
Marietta, GA, Development Facilities Authority Rev. (Life University), 7%, 2030 | 100,000 | 98,831 | ||||
Marietta, GA, Development Facilities Authority Rev. (Life University), 7%, 2039 | 100,000 | 97,456 | ||||
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency Rev. (Simmons College), SYNCORA, 5.25%, 2026 | 125,000 | 131,164 | ||||
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency Rev. (Western New England College), 6.125%, 2012 (c) | 315,000 | 355,985 | ||||
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Simmons College), I, 8%, 2029 | 225,000 | 256,095 | ||||
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Springfield College), 5.625%, 2040 | 90,000 | 90,808 | ||||
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Suffolk University), A, 6.25%, 2030 | 415,000 | 438,506 | ||||
Miami-Dade County, FL, Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (University of Miami), A, 5.75%, 2028 | 125,000 | 131,030 |
22
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||
Universities - Colleges - continued | ||||||
Michigan Higher Education Facilities Authority Rev. (College for Creative Studies), 6.125%, 2037 | $ | 475,000 | $ | 451,735 | ||
New Jersey Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (University of Medicine & Dentistry), B, 7.5%, 2032 | 460,000 | 529,529 | ||||
New York Dormitory Authority Rev. (Columbia University), 5%, 2038 (u) | 15,000,000 | 16,090,500 | ||||
Pennsylvania Higher Educational Facilities Authority Rev. (Lasalle University), A, 5.25%, 2027 | 45,000 | 45,438 | ||||
San Leanna, TX, Educational Facilities Corp., Higher Education Rev. (St. Edwards University), 5.125%, 2036 | 115,000 | 106,090 | ||||
Tulsa, OK, Industrial Authority Rev. (University of Tulsa), 6%, 2027 | 535,000 | 586,574 | ||||
University of Minnesota, A, ETM, 5.75%, 2014 (c) | 500,000 | 587,865 | ||||
University of Minnesota, A, ETM, 5.5%, 2021 (c) | 2,000,000 | 2,394,820 | ||||
University of Southern Indiana Rev., Student Fee, J, ASSD GTY, 5.75%, 2028 | 210,000 | 233,694 | ||||
University of Southern Mississippi Educational Building Corp. Rev. (Campus Facilities Project), 5.25%, 2032 | 190,000 | 204,991 | ||||
University of Southern Mississippi, Educational Building Corp. Rev. (Campus Facilities Project), 5.375%, 2036 | 65,000 | 70,074 | ||||
Washington Higher Education Facilities Authority Rev. (Whitworth University), 5.875%, 2034 | 225,000 | 235,249 | ||||
$ | 28,727,376 | |||||
Universities - Dormitories - 0.8% | ||||||
California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev. (Lancer Educational Student Housing Project), 5.625%, 2033 | $ | 500,000 | $ | 408,765 | ||
California Statewide Communities Development Authority Rev. (Student Housing, SUCI East Campus), 6%, 2040 | 220,000 | 223,265 | ||||
Maryland Economic Development Corp. Student Housing (University of Maryland - College Park), 5.875%, 2043 | 130,000 | 131,860 | ||||
Pennsylvania Higher Education Facilities Authority Rev. (Edinboro University Foundation), 5.8%, 2030 | 65,000 | 64,691 | ||||
Pennsylvania Higher Education Facilities Authority Rev. (Edinboro University Foundation), 6%, 2043 | 85,000 | 85,059 | ||||
$ | 913,640 | |||||
Universities - Secondary Schools - 0.5% | ||||||
Clifton, TX, Higher Education Finance Corp. Rev. (Uplift Education), A, 6.125%, 2040 | $ | 100,000 | $ | 100,345 | ||
Clifton, TX, Higher Education Finance Corp. Rev. (Uplift Education), A, 6.25%, 2045 | 70,000 | 70,267 | ||||
Colorado Educational & Cultural Facilities Authority Rev. (Academy of Charter Schools Project), 5.625%, 2040 | 230,000 | 230,934 |
23
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||
Universities - Secondary Schools - continued | ||||||
La Vernia, TX, Higher Education Finance Corp. Rev. (KIPP, Inc.), A, 6.25%, 2039 | $ | 150,000 | $ | 155,828 | ||
$ | 557,374 | |||||
Utilities - Cogeneration - 1.0% | ||||||
Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority Rev., Resource Recovery Rev. (Colver), G, 5.125%, 2015 | $ | 325,000 | $ | 316,290 | ||
Puerto Rico Industrial, Tourist, Educational, Medical & Environmental Central Facilities (Cogeneration Facilities - AES Puerto Rico Project), 6.625%, 2026 | 320,000 | 322,870 | ||||
Suffolk County, NY, Industrial Development Agency Rev. (Nissequoque Cogeneration Partners Facilities), 5.5%, 2023 | 550,000 | 485,073 | ||||
$ | 1,124,233 | |||||
Utilities - Investor Owned - 11.4% | ||||||
Brazos River Authority, TX, Pollution Control Rev. (Texas Utility Co.), A, 7.7%, 2033 | $ | 250,000 | $ | 149,548 | ||
Brazos River Authority, TX, Pollution Control Rev. (TXU Electric Co. LLC), C, 5.75%, 2036 (b) | 65,000 | 62,051 | ||||
Brazos River Authority, TX, Pollution Control Rev. (TXU Electric Co. LLC), C, 6.75%, 2038 | 270,000 | 155,914 | ||||
Chula Vista, CA, Industrial Development Rev. (San Diego Gas), 5.875%, 2034 | 195,000 | 216,175 | ||||
Clark County, NV, Industrial Development Rev. (Nevada Power Co. Project), B, 5.9%, 2030 | 250,000 | 242,498 | ||||
Clark County, NV, Industrial Development Rev. (Southwest Gas Corp. Project), E, 5.8%, 2038 (b) | 250,000 | 270,703 | ||||
Farmington, NM, Pollution Control Rev. (Public Service New Mexico), D, 5.9%, 2040 | 400,000 | 400,296 | ||||
Hawaii Department of Budget & Finance Special Purpose Rev. (Hawaiian Electric Co. & Subsidiary), 6.5%, 2039 | 410,000 | 446,519 | ||||
Maricopa County, AZ, Pollution Control Corp., Pollution Control Rev. (Arizona Public Service Co.), D, 6%, 2029 (b) | 195,000 | 214,917 | ||||
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, Solid Waste Disposal Rev. (Dominion Energy Brayton), 5.75%, 2042 (b) | 70,000 | 74,668 | ||||
Matagorda County, TX, Navigation District 1 (Houston Lighting.), AMBAC, 5.125%, 2028 | 2,000,000 | 1,927,200 | ||||
Michigan Strategic Fund, Ltd. Obligation Rev. (Detroit Edison), A, NATL, 5.55%, 2029 | 3,000,000 | 2,968,260 | ||||
Mississippi Business Finance Corp., Pollution Control Rev. (Systems Energy Resources Project), 5.875%, 2022 | 1,000,000 | 1,003,740 | ||||
New Hampshire Business Finance Authority, Pollution Control Rev. (Public Service of New Hampshire), B, NATL, 4.75%, 2021 | 250,000 | 249,148 |
24
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) continued
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||
Municipal Bonds - continued | ||||||
Utilities - Investor Owned - continued | ||||||
Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority (Allegheny Energy Supply Co. LLC), 7%, 2039 | $ | 495,000 | $ | 551,014 | ||
Petersburg, IN, Pollution Control Rev. (Indianapolis Power & Light), NATL, 5.4%, 2017 | 2,500,000 | 2,748,600 | ||||
Pima County, AZ, Industrial Development Authority Rev. (Tucson Electric Power Co.), 5.75%, 2029 | 485,000 | 490,849 | ||||
Sweetwater County, WY, Pollution Control Rev. (Idaho Power Co.), 5.25%, 2026 | 425,000 | 450,887 | ||||
$ | 12,622,987 | |||||
Utilities - Other - 3.3% | ||||||
Georgia Main Street Natural Gas, Inc., Gas Project Rev., A, 5.5%, 2026 | $ | 120,000 | $ | 119,098 | ||
Georgia Main Street Natural Gas, Inc., Gas Project Rev., A, 5.5%, 2028 | 250,000 | 245,178 | ||||
Indiana Bond Bank Special Program, Gas Rev., A, 5.25%, 2018 | 190,000 | 199,969 | ||||
Public Authority for Colorado Energy Natural Gas Purchase Rev., 6.5%, 2038 | 235,000 | 256,730 | ||||
Salt Verde Financial Corp., AZ, Senior Gas Rev., 5%, 2032 | 795,000 | 718,251 | ||||
Salt Verde Financial Corp., AZ, Senior Gas Rev., 5%, 2037 | 790,000 | 698,336 | ||||
Tennessee Energy Acquisition Corp., Gas Rev., A, 5.25%, 2017 | 180,000 | 181,062 | ||||
Tennessee Energy Acquisition Corp., Gas Rev., A, 5.25%, 2022 | 205,000 | 200,816 | ||||
Tennessee Energy Acquisition Corp., Gas Rev., A, 5.25%, 2023 | 300,000 | 292,158 | ||||
Tennessee Energy Acquisition Corp., Gas Rev., A, 5.25%, 2026 | 610,000 | 584,228 | ||||
Tennessee Energy Acquisition Corp., Gas Rev., C, 5%, 2025 | 185,000 | 172,252 | ||||
$ | 3,668,078 | |||||
Water & Sewer Utility Revenue - 3.0% | ||||||
Atlanta, GA, Water & Wastewater Rev., A, 6%, 2022 | $ | 290,000 | $ | 321,184 | ||
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Authority Rev., A, 6%, 2038 | 505,000 | 533,735 | ||||
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Authority Rev., A, 6%, 2044 | 195,000 | 204,649 | ||||
Detroit, MI, Sewer Disposal System Rev., B, AGM, 7.5%, 2033 | 410,000 | 487,670 | ||||
Hampton Roads, VA, Sanitation District Wastewater Rev., 5%, 2033 | 140,000 | 150,296 | ||||
Massachusetts Water Pollution Abatement, 5.25%, 2028 | 750,000 | 906,045 | ||||
Massachusetts Water Resources Authority, B, AGM, 5.25%, 2029 | 600,000 | 702,336 | ||||
$ | 3,305,915 | |||||
Total Municipal Bonds (Identified Cost, $159,394,783) | $ | 163,917,208 |
25
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) continued
Money Market Funds (v) - 1.0% | ||||||
Issuer | Shares/Par | Value ($) | ||||
MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio, 0.24%, at Cost and Net Asset Value |
1,071,419 | $ | 1,071,419 | |||
Total Investments (Identified Cost, $160,466,202) | $ | 164,988,627 | ||||
Other Assets, Less Liabilities - (4.6)% | (5,070,183 | ) | ||||
Preferred shares (Issued by the Fund) - (43.8)% | (48,750,000 | ) | ||||
Net Assets applicable to common shares - 100.0% | $ | 111,168,444 |
(a) | Non-income producing security. |
(b) | Mandatory tender date is earlier than stated maturity date. |
(c) | Refunded bond. |
(d) | Non-income producing security in default. |
(f) | All or a portion of the security has been segregated as collateral for open futures contracts. |
(j) | Crossover refunded bond. |
(n) | Securities exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be sold in the ordinary course of business in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. At period end, the aggregate value of these securities was $1,299,844 representing 1.2% of net assets applicable to common shares. |
(u) | Underlying security deposited into special purpose trust (the trust) by investment banker upon creation of self-deposited inverse floaters. |
(v) | Underlying fund that is available only to investment companies managed by MFS. The rate quoted is the annualized seven-day yield of the fund at period end. |
(z) | Restricted securities are not registered under the Securities Act of 1933 and are subject to legal restrictions on resale. These securities generally may be resold in transactions exempt from registration or to the public if the securities are subsequently registered. Disposal of these securities may involve time-consuming negotiations and prompt sale at an acceptable price may be difficult. The fund holds the following restricted securities: |
Restricted Securities | Acquisition Date |
Cost | Current Market Value | |||
MuniMae TE Bond Subsidiary LLC, 5.5%, 2049 | 11/02/05 | $1,000,000 | $634,240 | |||
Resolution Trust Corp., Pass-Through Certificates, 1993, 9.75%, 2016 | 8/27/93 | 229,441 | 216,192 | |||
Total Restricted Securities | $850,432 | |||||
% of Net Assets applicable to common shares | 0.8% |
The following abbreviations are used in this report and are defined:
COP | Certificate of Participation |
ETM | Escrowed to Maturity |
LOC | Letter of Credit |
26
Portfolio of Investments (unaudited) continued
Insurers | ||
AGM | Assured Guaranty Municipal | |
AMBAC | AMBAC Indemnity Corp. | |
ASSD GTY | Assured Guaranty Insurance Co. | |
BHAC | Berkshire Hathaway Assurance Corp. | |
CHCLI | California Health Construction Loan Insurance | |
FGIC | Financial Guaranty Insurance Co. | |
FHA | Federal Housing Administration | |
FHLMC | Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. | |
GNMA | Government National Mortgage Assn. | |
NATL | National Public Finance Guarantee Corp. | |
SYNCORA | Syncora Guarantee Inc. |
Derivative Contracts at 5/31/10
Futures Contracts Outstanding at 5/31/10
Description | Currency | Contracts | Value | Expiration Date |
Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) | |||||
Asset Derivatives | ||||||||||
Interest Rate Futures | ||||||||||
U.S. Treasury Note 10 yr (Short) | USD | 115 | $13,785,625 | Sep-10 | $47,215 | |||||
U.S. Treasury Bond 30 yr (Short) | USD | 41 | 5,028,906 | Sep-10 | 53,989 | |||||
$101,204 | ||||||||||
At May 31, 2010, the fund had sufficient cash and/or other liquid securities to cover any commitments under these derivative contracts.
See Notes to Financial Statements
27
Financial Statements
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
At 5/31/10 (unaudited)
This statement represents your funds balance sheet, which details the assets and liabilities comprising the total value of the fund.
Assets | |||||
Investments- |
|||||
Non-affiliated issuers, at value (identified cost, $159,394,783) |
$163,917,208 | ||||
Underlying funds, at cost and value |
1,071,419 | ||||
Total investments, at value (identified cost, $160,466,202) |
$164,988,627 | ||||
Receivables for |
|||||
Investments sold |
353,394 | ||||
Interest |
2,825,675 | ||||
Other assets | 20,716 | ||||
Total assets |
$168,188,412 | ||||
Liabilities | |||||
Payables for |
|||||
Distributions on common shares |
$46,791 | ||||
Distributions on preferred shares |
4,270 | ||||
Daily variation margin on open futures contracts |
52,094 | ||||
Investments purchased |
549,942 | ||||
Payable to the holder of the floating rate certificate from |
7,518,000 | ||||
Payable for interest expense and fees |
17,106 | ||||
Payable to affiliates |
|||||
Investment adviser |
13,801 | ||||
Transfer agent and dividend disbursing costs |
1,528 | ||||
Administrative services fee |
441 | ||||
Payable for independent Trustees compensation |
5,385 | ||||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities | 60,610 | ||||
Total liabilities | $8,269,968 | ||||
Preferred shares | |||||
Auction preferred shares (1,950 shares issued and outstanding at $25,000 per share) at liquidation value |
$48,750,000 | ||||
Net assets applicable to common shares | $111,168,444 | ||||
Net assets consist of | |||||
Paid-in capital common shares | $126,934,776 | ||||
Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments | 4,623,629 | ||||
Accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments | (21,150,820 | ) | |||
Undistributed net investment income |
760,859 | ||||
Net assets applicable to common shares | $111,168,444 | ||||
Preferred shares, at liquidation value (1,950 shares issued and outstanding at $25,000 per share) |
48,750,000 | ||||
Net assets including preferred shares | $159,918,444 | ||||
Common shares of beneficial interest outstanding | 11,513,849 | ||||
Net asset value per common share (net assets of |
$9.66 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
28
Financial Statements
Six months ended 5/31/10 (unaudited)
This statement describes how much your fund earned in investment income and accrued in expenses. It also describes any gains and/or losses generated by fund operations.
Net investment income | ||||||
Interest income |
$4,593,839 | |||||
Dividends from underlying funds |
1,105 | |||||
Total investment income |
$4,594,944 | |||||
Expenses |
||||||
Management fee |
$513,772 | |||||
Transfer agent and dividend disbursing costs |
9,870 | |||||
Administrative services fee |
16,315 | |||||
Independent Trustees compensation |
9,547 | |||||
Stock exchange fee |
11,306 | |||||
Preferred shares service fee |
25,684 | |||||
Custodian fee |
11,066 | |||||
Shareholder communications |
15,102 | |||||
Auditing fees |
36,607 | |||||
Legal fees |
4,529 | |||||
Interest expense and fees |
19,321 | |||||
Miscellaneous |
40,487 | |||||
Total expenses |
$713,606 | |||||
Reduction of expenses by investment adviser |
(16,105 | ) | ||||
Net expenses |
$697,501 | |||||
Net investment income |
$3,897,443 | |||||
Realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | ||||||
Realized gain (loss) (identified cost basis) |
||||||
Investment transactions |
$40,820 | |||||
Futures contracts |
(702,857 | ) | ||||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments |
$(662,037 | ) | ||||
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) |
||||||
Investments |
$3,643,282 | |||||
Futures contracts |
402,509 | |||||
Net unrealized gain (loss) on investments |
$4,045,791 | |||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments |
$3,383,754 | |||||
Distributions declared to preferred shareholders |
$(96,545 | ) | ||||
Change in net assets from operations |
$7,184,652 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
29
Financial Statements
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
These statements describe the increases and/or decreases in net assets resulting from operations, any distributions, and any shareholder transactions.
Six months ended 5/31/10 |
Year ended 11/30/09 |
|||||
Change in net assets | (unaudited) | |||||
From operations | ||||||
Net investment income |
$3,897,443 | $7,892,489 | ||||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments |
(662,037 | ) | (3,263,936 | ) | ||
Net unrealized gain (loss) on investments |
4,045,791 | 19,321,775 | ||||
Distributions declared to preferred shareholders |
(96,545 | ) | (347,025 | ) | ||
Change in net assets from operations |
$7,184,652 | $23,603,303 | ||||
Distributions declared to common shareholders | ||||||
From net investment income |
$(3,729,178 | ) | $(6,928,417 | ) | ||
Net asset value of shares issued to common shareholders in reinvestment of distributions |
$46,696 | $ | ||||
Total change in net assets |
$3,502,170 | $16,674,886 | ||||
Net assets applicable to common shares | ||||||
At beginning of period |
107,666,274 | 90,991,388 | ||||
At end of period (including undistributed net investment income of $760,859 and $689,139, respectively) |
$111,168,444 | $107,666,274 |
See Notes to Financial Statements
30
Financial Statements
The financial highlights table is intended to help you understand the funds financial performance for the semiannual period and the past 5 fiscal years. Certain information reflects financial results for a single fund share. The total returns in the table represent the rate by which an investor would have earned (or lost) on an investment in the fund share class (assuming reinvestment of all distributions) held for the entire period.
Six months (unaudited) |
Years ended 11/30 | |||||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning |
$9.35 | $7.91 | $10.56 | $11.53 | $11.16 | $11.14 | ||||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations |
||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (d) |
$0.34 | $0.69 | $0.67 | $ 0.79 | (z) | $0.75 | $0.75 | |||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments |
0.30 | 1.38 | (2.59 | ) | (1.02 | )(z) | 0.37 | 0.05 | ||||||||||
Distributions declared to |
(0.01 | ) | (0.03 | ) | (0.18 | ) | (0.19 | ) | (0.17 | ) | (0.12 | ) | ||||||
Total from investment operations |
$0.63 | $2.04 | $(2.10 | ) | $(0.42 | ) | $0.95 | $0.68 | ||||||||||
Less distributions declared to common shareholders |
||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income, common shares |
$(0.32 | ) | $(0.60 | ) | $(0.55 | ) | $(0.55 | ) | $(0.58 | ) | $(0.66 | ) | ||||||
Net asset value, end of period |
$9.66 | $9.35 | $7.91 | $10.56 | $11.53 | $11.16 | ||||||||||||
Common share market value, |
$9.54 | $9.08 | $6.35 | $9.56 | $10.73 | $10.40 | ||||||||||||
Total return at common market |
8.71 | (n) | 53.99 | (29.32 | ) | (6.12 | ) | 8.96 | 10.68 | |||||||||
Total return at net asset |
6.90 | (n) | 27.29 | (20.30 | ) | (3.50 | ) | 9.11 | 6.72 | |||||||||
Ratios (%) (to average net assets applicable to common shares) and Supplemental data: |
||||||||||||||||||
Expenses before expense |
1.30 | (a) | 1.44 | 1.56 | 1.35 | 1.37 | 1.30 | |||||||||||
Expenses after expense |
1.27 | (a) | 1.40 | 1.47 | 1.32 | 1.34 | 1.30 | |||||||||||
Expenses after expense reductions and excluding interest expense and fees (f)(l)(p) |
1.24 | (a) | 1.33 | 1.34 | 1.29 | 1.31 | 1.30 | |||||||||||
Net investment income (p) |
7.12 | (a) | 7.94 | 6.82 | 7.10 | (z) | 6.71 | 6.64 | ||||||||||
Portfolio turnover |
3 | 14 | 34 | 24 | 34 | 16 | ||||||||||||
Net assets at end of period |
$111,168 | $107,666 | $90,991 | $121,593 | $132,663 | $128,402 |
31
Financial Highlights continued
Six months (unaudited) |
Years ended 11/30 | ||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||
Supplemental Ratios (%): | |||||||||||||
Net investment income available to common shares |
6.94 | (a) | 7.59 | 5.01 | 5.37 | 5.15 | 5.61 | ||||||
Senior Securities: | |||||||||||||
Total preferred shares outstanding |
1,950 | 1,950 | 1,950 | 2,400 | 2,400 | 2,400 | |||||||
Asset coverage per preferred share (k) |
$82,009 | $80,213 | $71,662 | $75,664 | $80,276 | $78,501 | |||||||
Involuntary liquidation preference per preferred share (o) |
$25,000 | $25,000 | $25,000 | $25,000 | $25,007 | $25,004 | |||||||
Average market value per preferred |
$25,000 | $25,000 | $25,000 | $25,000 | $25,000 | $25,000 |
(a) | Annualized. |
(d) | Per share data is based on average shares outstanding. |
(f) | Ratios do not reflect reductions from fees paid indirectly, if applicable. |
(j) | Total return at net asset value is calculated using the net asset value of the fund, not the publicly traded price and therefore may be different than the total return at market value. |
(k) | Calculated by subtracting the funds total liabilities (not including preferred shares) from the funds total assets and dividing this number by the number of preferred shares outstanding. |
(l) | Interest expense and fees relate to payments made to the holder of the floating rate certificate from trust assets. |
(m) | Amount excludes accrued unpaid distributions to Auction Preferred Shareholders. |
(n) | Not annualized. |
(o) | Effective November 30, 2007, amount excludes accrued unpaid distributions to Auction Preferred Shareholders. |
(p) | Ratio excludes dividend payment on auction preferred shares. |
(r) | Certain expenses have been reduced without which performance would have been lower. |
(s) | From time to time the fund may receive proceeds from litigation settlements, without which performance would be lower. |
(t) | Prior to November 30, 2007, total return at net asset value is unaudited. |
(x) | Average market value represents the approximate fair value of the funds liability. |
(z) | The fund applied a change in estimate for amortization of premium on certain debt securities in the year ended November 30, 2007 that resulted in an increase of $0.04 per share to net investment income, a decrease of $0.04 per share to net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments, and an increase of 0.35% to the net investment income ratio. The change in estimate had no impact on net assets, net asset value per share or total return. |
See Notes to Financial Statements
32
(unaudited)
(1) | Business and Organization |
MFS Investment Grade Municipal Trust (the fund) is organized as a Massachusetts business trust and is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, as a closed-end management investment company.
(2) | Significant Accounting Policies |
General The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. In the preparation of these financial statements, management has evaluated subsequent events occurring after the date of the funds Statement of Assets and Liabilities through the date that the financial statements were issued. The value of municipal instruments can be affected by changes in their actual or perceived credit quality. The credit quality of municipal instruments can be affected by, among other things, the financial condition of the issuer or guarantor, the issuers future borrowing plans and sources of revenue, the economic feasibility of the revenue bond project or general borrowing purpose, political or economic developments in the region where the instrument is issued and the liquidity of the security. Municipal instruments generally trade in the over-the-counter market. Municipal instruments backed by current and anticipated revenues from a specific project or specific assets can be negatively affected by the discontinuance of the taxation supporting the projects or assets or the inability to collect revenues for the project or from the assets. If the Internal Revenue Service determines an issuer of a municipal instrument has not complied with the applicable tax requirements, the security could decline in value, interest from the security could become taxable and the funds may be required to issue Forms 1099-DIV.
Investment Valuations Debt instruments and floating rate loans (other than short-term instruments), including restricted debt instruments, are generally valued at an evaluated or composite bid as provided by a third-party pricing service. Short-term instruments with a maturity at issuance of 60 days or less generally are valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value. Futures contracts are generally valued at last posted settlement price as provided by a third-party pricing service on the market on which they are primarily traded. Futures contracts for which there were no trades that day for a particular position are generally valued at the closing bid quotation as provided by a third-party pricing service on the market on which such futures
33
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) continued
contracts are primarily traded. Open-end investment companies are generally valued at net asset value per share. Securities and other assets generally valued on the basis of information from a third-party pricing service may also be valued at a broker/dealer bid quotation. Values obtained from third-party pricing services can utilize both transaction data and market information such as yield, quality, coupon rate, maturity, type of issue, trading characteristics, and other market data.
The Board of Trustees has delegated primary responsibility for determining or causing to be determined the value of the funds investments (including any fair valuation) to the adviser pursuant to valuation policies and procedures approved by the Board. If the adviser determines that reliable market quotations are not readily available, investments are valued at fair value as determined in good faith by the adviser in accordance with such procedures under the oversight of the Board of Trustees. Under the funds valuation policies and procedures, market quotations are not considered to be readily available for most types of debt instruments and floating rate loans and many types of derivatives. These investments are generally valued at fair value based on information from third-party pricing services. In addition, investments may be valued at fair value if the adviser determines that an investments value has been materially affected by events occurring after the close of the exchange or market on which the investment is principally traded (such as foreign exchange or market) and prior to the determination of the funds net asset value, or after the halting of trading of a specific security where trading does not resume prior to the close of the exchange or market on which the security is principally traded. The adviser generally relies on third-party pricing services or other information (such as the correlation with price movements of similar securities in the same or other markets; the type, cost and investment characteristics of the security; the business and financial condition of the issuer; and trading and other market data) to assist in determining whether to fair value and at what value to fair value an investment. The value of an investment for purposes of calculating the funds net asset value can differ depending on the source and method used to determine value. When fair valuation is used, the value of an investment used to determine the funds net asset value may differ from quoted or published prices for the same investment. There can be no assurance that the fund could obtain the fair value assigned to an investment if it were to sell the investment at the same time at which the fund determines its net asset value per share.
Various inputs are used in determining the value of the funds assets or liabilities. These inputs are categorized into three broad levels. In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, an investments level within the fair value
34
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) continued
hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The funds assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the investment. Level 1 includes unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 includes other significant observable market-based inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speed, and credit risk). Level 3 includes unobservable inputs, which may include the advisers own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments. Other financial instruments are derivative instruments not reflected in total investments, such as futures, forwards, swap contracts, and written options. The following is a summary of the levels used as of May 31, 2010 in valuing the funds assets or liabilities:
Investments at Value | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | ||||
Municipal Bonds | $ | $163,917,208 | $ | $163,917,208 | ||||
Mutual Funds | 1,071,419 | | | 1,071,419 | ||||
Total Investments | $1,071,419 | $163,917,208 | $ | $164,988,627 | ||||
Other Financial Instruments | ||||||||
Futures | $101,204 | $ | $ | $101,204 |
For further information regarding security characteristics, see the Portfolio of Investments.
Derivatives The fund may use derivatives for different purposes, including to earn income and enhance returns, to increase or decrease exposure to a particular market, to manage or adjust the risk profile of the fund, or as alternatives to direct investments. Derivatives may be used for hedging or non-hedging purposes. While hedging can reduce or eliminate losses, it can also reduce or eliminate gains. When the fund uses derivatives as an investment to increase market exposure, or for hedging purposes, gains and losses from derivative instruments may be substantially greater than the derivatives original cost.
Derivative instruments include written options, purchased options, futures contracts, forward foreign currency exchange contracts, and swap agreements. The funds period end derivatives, as presented in the Portfolio of Investments and the associated Derivative Contract Tables, generally are indicative of the volume of its derivative activity during the period.
35
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) continued
The following table presents, by major type of derivative contract, the fair value, on a gross basis, of the asset and liability components of derivatives held by the fund at May 31, 2010:
Fair Value (a) | ||||||
Risk | Derivative | Asset Derivatives | Liability Derivatives | |||
Interest Rate Contracts |
Interest Rate Futures | $101,204 | $ |
(a) | All derivative valuations are specifically referenced within the funds Statement of Assets and Liabilities except for futures contracts. The value of futures contracts outstanding includes cumulative appreciation/depreciation as reported in the funds Portfolio of Investments. Only the current day variation margin for futures contracts is separately reported within the funds Statement of Assets and Liabilities. |
The following table presents, by major type of derivative contract, the realized gain (loss) on derivatives held by the fund for the six months ended May 31, 2010 as reported in the Statement of Operations:
Futures Contracts | |||
Interest Rate Contracts | $(702,857 | ) |
The following table presents, by major type of derivative contract, the change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on derivatives held by the fund for the six months ended May 31, 2010 as reported in the Statement of Operations:
Futures Contracts | ||
Interest Rate Contracts | $402,509 |
Derivative counterparty credit risk is managed through formal evaluation of the creditworthiness of all potential counterparties. On certain over-the-counter derivatives, the fund attempts to reduce its exposure to counterparty credit risk whenever possible by entering into an International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) Master Agreement on a bilateral basis with each of the counterparties with whom it undertakes a significant volume of transactions. The ISDA Master Agreement gives each party to the agreement the right to terminate all transactions traded under such agreement if there is a certain deterioration in the credit quality of the other party. The ISDA Master Agreement gives the fund the right, upon an event of default by the applicable counterparty or a termination of the agreement, to close out all transactions traded under such agreement and to net amounts owed under each transaction to one net amount payable by one party to the other. This right to close out and net payments across all transactions traded under the ISDA Master Agreement could result in a reduction of the funds credit risk to such counterparty equal to any amounts payable by the fund under the applicable transactions, if any. However, absent an event of default by the counterparty or a termination of the agreement, the ISDA Master Agreement does not result in an offset of reported balance sheet assets and liabilities across transactions between the fund and the applicable counterparty.
36
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) continued
Collateral requirements differ by type of derivative. Collateral or margin requirements are set by the broker or exchange clearing house for exchange traded derivatives (i.e., futures and exchange-traded options) while collateral terms are contract specific for over-the-counter traded derivatives (i.e., forwards, swaps and over-the-counter options). For derivatives traded under an ISDA Master Agreement, the collateral requirements are netted across all transactions traded under such agreement and one amount is posted from one party to the other to collateralize such obligations. Cash collateral that has been pledged to cover obligations of the fund under derivative contracts will be reported separately on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities as restricted cash. Securities collateral pledged for the same purpose is noted in the Portfolio of Investments.
Futures Contracts The fund may use futures contracts to gain or to hedge against broad market, interest rate or currency exposure. A futures contract represents a commitment for the future purchase or sale of an asset at a specified price on a specified date.
Upon entering into a futures contract, the fund is required to deposit with the broker, either in cash or securities, an initial margin in an amount equal to a certain percentage of the notional amount of the contract. Subsequent payments (variation margin) are made or received by the fund each day, depending on the daily fluctuations in the value of the contract, and are recorded for financial statement purposes as unrealized gain or loss by the fund until the contract is closed or expires at which point the gain or loss on futures is realized.
The fund bears the risk of interest rates, exchange rates or securities prices moving unexpectedly, in which case, the fund may not achieve the anticipated benefits of the futures contracts and may realize a loss. While futures may present less counterparty risk to the fund since the contracts are exchange traded and the exchanges clearinghouse guarantees payments to the broker, there is still counterparty credit risk due to the insolvency of the broker. The funds maximum risk of loss due to counterparty credit risk is equal to the margin posted by the fund to the broker plus any gains or minus any losses on the outstanding futures contracts.
Inverse Floaters The fund invests in municipal inverse floating rate securities which are structured by the issuer (known as primary market inverse floating rate securities) or by an investment banker utilizing municipal bonds which have already been issued (known as secondary market inverse floating rate securities) to have variable rates of interest which typically move in the opposite direction of short term interest rates. A secondary market inverse floating rate security is created when an investment banker transfers a fixed rate municipal bond to a special purpose trust, and causes the trust to (a) issue
37
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) continued
floating rate certificates to third parties, in an amount equal to a fraction of the par amount of the deposited bonds (these certificates usually pay tax-exempt interest at short-term interest rates that typically reset weekly; and the certificate holders typically, on seven days notice, have the option to tender their certificates to the investment banker or another party for redemption at par plus accrued interest), and (b) issue inverse floating rate certificates (sometimes referred to as inverse floaters). If the holder of the inverse floater transfers the municipal bonds to an investment banker for the purpose of depositing the municipal bonds into the special purpose trust, the inverse floating rate certificates that are issued by the trust are referred to as self-deposited inverse floaters. If the bonds held by the trust are purchased by the investment banker for deposit into the trust from someone other than the purchasers of the inverse floaters, the inverse floating rate certificates that are issued by the trust are referred to as externally deposited inverse floaters. Such self-deposited inverse floaters held by the fund are accounted for as secured borrowings, with the municipal bonds reflected in the investments of the fund and amounts owed to the holder of the floating rate certificate under the provisions of the trust, which amounts are paid solely from the assets of the trust, reflected as liabilities of the fund in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities under the caption, Payable to the holder of the floating rate certificate from trust assets. The carrying value of the funds payable to the holder of the floating rate certificate from trust assets as reported on the funds Statement of Assets and Liabilities approximates its fair value. At May 31, 2010, the funds payable to the holder of the floating rate certificate from trust assets was $7,518,000 and the interest rate on these floating rate certificates issued by the trust was 1.61%. For the six months ended May 31, 2010, the average payable to the holder of the floating rate certificate from trust assets was $ 7,514,200 at a weighted average interest rate of 0.52%. Interest expense and fees relate to interest payments made to the holder of certain floating rate certificates and associated fees, both of which are made from trust assets. Interest expense and fees are recorded as incurred. For the six months ended May 31, 2010, interest expense and fees in connection with self-deposited inverse floaters was $19,321. Primary and externally deposited inverse floaters held by the fund are not accounted for as secured borrowings.
Indemnifications Under the funds organizational documents, its officers and Trustees may be indemnified against certain liabilities and expenses arising out of the performance of their duties to the fund. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the fund enters into agreements with service providers that may contain indemnification clauses. The funds maximum exposure under these agreements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the fund that have not yet occurred.
38
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) continued
Investment Transactions and Income Investment transactions are recorded on the trade date. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis. All premium and discount is amortized or accreted for financial statement purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Dividends received in cash are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Dividend and interest payments received in additional securities are recorded on the ex-dividend or ex-interest date in an amount equal to the value of the security on such date. Debt obligations may be placed on non-accrual status or set to accrue at a rate of interest less than the contractual coupon when the collection of all or a portion of interest has become doubtful. Interest income for those debt obligations may be further reduced by the write-off of the related interest receivables when deemed uncollectible. The fund may receive proceeds from litigation settlements. Any proceeds received from litigation involving portfolio holdings are reflected in the Statement of Operations in realized gain/loss if the security has been disposed of by the fund or in unrealized gain/loss if the security is still held by the fund. Any other proceeds from litigation not related to portfolio holdings are reflected as other income in the Statement of Operations.
Legal fees and other related expenses incurred to preserve and protect the value of a security owned are added to the cost of the security; other legal fees are expensed. Capital infusions made directly to the security issuer, which are generally non-recurring, incurred to protect or enhance the value of high-yield debt securities, are reported as additions to the cost basis of the security. Costs that are incurred to negotiate the terms or conditions of capital infusions or that are expected to result in a plan of reorganization are reported as realized losses. Ongoing costs incurred to protect or enhance an investment, or costs incurred to pursue other claims or legal actions, are expensed.
Fees Paid Indirectly The funds custody fee may be reduced according to an arrangement that measures the value of cash deposited with the custodian by the fund. For the six months ended May 31, 2010, custody fees were not reduced.
Tax Matters and Distributions The fund intends to qualify as a regulated investment company, as defined under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code, and to distribute all of its taxable and tax-exempt income, including realized capital gains. As a result, no provision for federal income tax is required. The funds federal tax return for the prior three fiscal years remains subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service.
Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Income and capital gain distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations, which may differ from U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Certain capital accounts in the financial statements are periodically
39
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) continued
adjusted for permanent differences in order to reflect their tax character. These adjustments have no impact on net assets or net asset value per share. Temporary differences which arise from recognizing certain items of income, expense, gain or loss in different periods for financial statement and tax purposes will reverse at some time in the future. Distributions in excess of net investment income or net realized gains are temporary overdistributions for financial statement purposes resulting from differences in the recognition or classification of income or distributions for financial statement and tax purposes.
Book/tax differences primarily relate to amortization and accretion of debt securities and derivative transactions.
The tax character of distributions made during the current period will be determined at fiscal year end. The tax character of distributions declared to shareholders for the last fiscal year is as follows:
11/30/09 | ||
Ordinary income (including any short-term capital gains) | $249,596 | |
Tax-exempt income | 7,025,846 | |
Total distributions | $7,275,442 |
The federal tax cost and the tax basis components of distributable earnings were as follows:
As of 5/31/10 | |||
Cost of investments | $152,590,077 | ||
Gross appreciation | 10,282,344 | ||
Gross depreciation | (5,401,794 | ) | |
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | $4,880,550 | ||
As of 11/30/09 | |||
Undistributed ordinary income | 5,630 | ||
Undistributed tax-exempt income | 749,238 | ||
Capital loss carryforwards | (20,518,051 | ) | |
Post-October capital loss deferral | (627,173 | ) | |
Other temporary differences | (65,729 | ) | |
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | 1,234,279 |
The aggregate cost above includes prior fiscal year end tax adjustments, if applicable.
40
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) continued
As of November 30, 2009, the fund had capital loss carryforwards available to offset future realized gains. Such losses expire as follows:
11/30/10 | $(1,238,884 | ) | |
11/30/15 | (7,005,145 | ) | |
11/30/16 | (6,501,801 | ) | |
11/30/17 | (5,772,221 | ) | |
$(20,518,051 | ) |
(3) | Transactions with Affiliates |
Investment Adviser The fund has an investment advisory agreement with MFS to provide overall investment management and related administrative services and facilities to the fund. The management fee is computed daily and paid monthly at an annual rate of 0.65% of the funds average daily net assets (including the value of auction preferred shares).
The investment adviser has agreed in writing to reduce its management fee to 0.63% of average daily net assets (including the value of auction preferred shares). This written agreement will continue until modified by the funds Board of Trustees, but such agreement will continue at least until November 30, 2010. This management fee reduction amounted to $15,808, which is shown as a reduction of total expenses in the Statement of Operations. The management fee incurred for the six months ended May 31, 2010 was equivalent to an annual effective rate of 0.63% of the funds average daily net assets (including the value of auction preferred shares).
The investment adviser has agreed in writing to pay a portion of the funds total annual operating expenses, exclusive of interest, taxes, extraordinary expenses, brokerage and transaction costs and investment-related expenses (including interest expense and fees associated with investments in inverse floating rate instruments) other than preferred shares service fees, such that operating expenses do not exceed 0.89% annually of the funds average daily net assets (including the value of auction preferred shares). This written agreement will continue until modified by the funds Board of Trustees, but such agreement will continue at least until November 30, 2010. For the six months ended May 31, 2010, the funds actual operating expenses did not exceed the limit and therefore, the investment adviser did not pay any portion of the funds expenses.
Transfer Agent The fund engages Computershare Trust Company, N.A. (Computershare) as the sole transfer agent for the funds common shares. MFS Service Center, Inc. (MFSC) monitors and supervises the activities of Computershare for an agreed upon fee approved by the Board of Trustees. For the six months ended May 31, 2010, these fees paid to MFSC amounted to $3,954.
41
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) continued
Administrator MFS provides certain financial, legal, shareholder communications, compliance, and other administrative services to the fund. Under an administrative services agreement, the fund partially reimburses MFS the costs incurred to provide these services. The fund is charged an annual fixed amount of $17,500 plus a fee based on average daily net assets (including the value of auction preferred shares). The administrative services fee incurred for the six months ended May 31, 2010 was equivalent to an annual effective rate of 0.0206% of the funds average daily net assets including the value of the auction preferred shares.
Trustees and Officers Compensation The fund pays compensation to independent Trustees in the form of a retainer, attendance fees, and additional compensation to Board and Committee chairpersons. The fund does not pay compensation directly to Trustees or to officers of the fund who are also officers of the investment adviser, all of whom receive remuneration for their services to the fund from MFS. Certain officers and Trustees of the fund are officers or directors of MFS and MFSC.
Deferred Trustee Compensation Prior to MFS appointment as investment adviser to the fund, the funds former independent Trustees participated in a Deferred Compensation Plan (the Former Colonial Trustees Plan or Plan). The funds current independent Trustees are not allowed to defer compensation under the Former Colonial Trustees Plan. Amounts deferred under the Plan are invested in shares of certain non-MFS funds selected by the former independent Trustees as notional investments. Deferred amounts represent an unsecured obligation of the fund until distributed in accordance with the Plan. Included in other assets and payable for independent Trustees compensation on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities is $5,357 of deferred Trustees compensation. There is no current year expense associated with the Former Colonial Trustees Plan.
Other This fund and certain other funds managed by MFS (the funds) have entered into services agreements (the Agreements) which provide for payment of fees by the funds to Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC in return for the provision of services of an Independent Chief Compliance Officer (ICCO) and Assistant ICCO, respectively, for the funds. The ICCO and Assistant ICCO are officers of the funds and the sole members of Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC, respectively. The funds can terminate the Agreements with Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC at any time under the terms of the Agreements. For the six months ended May 31, 2010, the aggregate fees paid by the fund to Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC were $671 and are included in miscellaneous expense on the Statement of Operations. MFS has agreed to reimburse the fund for a portion of the payments made by the fund in the amount of $297, which is shown as a reduction of total expenses in the
42
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) continued
Statement of Operations. Additionally, MFS has agreed to bear all expenses associated with office space, other administrative support, and supplies provided to the ICCO and Assistant ICCO.
The fund may invest in the MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio which is managed by MFS and seeks a high level of current income consistent with preservation of capital and liquidity. Income earned on this investment is included in dividends from underlying funds on the Statement of Operations. This money market fund does not pay a management fee to MFS.
(4) | Portfolio Securities |
Purchases and sales of investments, other than U.S. Government securities, purchased option transactions, and short-term obligations, aggregated $6,115,656 and $4,875,638, respectively.
(5) | Shares of Beneficial Interest |
The funds Declaration of Trust permits the Trustees to issue an unlimited number of full and fractional shares of beneficial interest. The fund reserves the right to repurchase shares of beneficial interest of the fund subject to Trustee approval. During the six months ended May 31, 2010, the fund did not repurchase any shares. Transactions in fund shares were as follows:
Six months ended 5/31/10 | ||||
Shares | Amount | |||
Shares issued to shareholders in reinvestment of distributions | 4,849 | $46,696 |
(6) | Line of Credit |
The fund and certain other funds managed by MFS participate in a $1.1 billion unsecured committed line of credit, subject to a $1 billion sublimit, provided by a syndication of banks under a credit agreement. Borrowings may be made for temporary financing needs. Interest is charged to each fund, based on its borrowings, generally at a rate equal to the higher of the Federal Reserve funds rate or one month LIBOR plus an agreed upon spread. A commitment fee, based on the average daily, unused portion of the committed line of credit, is allocated among the participating funds at the end of each calendar quarter. In addition, the fund and other funds managed by MFS have established unsecured uncommitted borrowing arrangements with certain banks for temporary financing needs. Interest is charged to each fund, based on its borrowings, at a rate equal to the Federal Reserve funds rate plus an agreed upon spread. For the six months ended May 31, 2010, the funds commitment fee and interest expense were $875 and $0, respectively, and are included in miscellaneous expense on the Statement of Operations.
43
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) continued
(7) | Transactions in Underlying Funds-Affiliated Issuers |
An affiliated issuer may be considered one in which the fund owns 5% or more of the outstanding voting securities, or a company which is under common control. For the purposes of this report, the fund assumes the following to be affiliated issuers:
Underlying Funds | Beginning Shares/Par Amount |
Acquisitions Shares/Par Amount |
Dispositions Shares/Par Amount |
Ending Shares/Par Amount | |||||
MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio |
1,647,155 | 11,598,355 | (12,174,091 | ) | 1,071,419 | ||||
Underlying Funds | Realized Gain (Loss) |
Capital Gain Distributions |
Dividend Income |
Ending Value | |||||
MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio |
$ | $ | $1,105 | $1,071,419 |
(8) | Auction Preferred Shares |
The fund has 1,950 shares issued and outstanding of Auction Preferred Shares (APS), series M. Dividends are cumulative at a rate that is reset every seven days through an auction process. If the APS are unable to be remarketed on a remarketing date as part of the auction process, the fund would be required to pay the maximum applicable rate on APS to holders of such shares for successive dividend periods until such time when the shares are successfully remarketed. The maximum rate on APS is equal to 110% of the higher of (i) the Taxable Equivalent of the Short-Term Municipal Bond Rate or (ii) the AA Composite Commercial Paper Rate.
Since February 2008, regularly scheduled auctions for APS issued by closed end funds, including this fund, have consistently failed because of insufficient demand (bids to buy shares) to meet the supply (shares offered for sale) at each auction. In a failed auction, APS holders cannot sell their shares tendered for sale. While repeated auction failures have affected the liquidity for APS, they do not constitute a default or automatically alter the credit quality of the APS, and APS holders have continued to receive dividends at the previously defined maximum rate. During the six months ended May 31, 2010, the APS dividend rates ranged from 0.26% to 0.66%. For the six months ended May 31, 2010, the average dividend rate was 0.40%. These developments with respect to APS do not affect the management or investment policies of the fund. However, one implication of these auction failures for Common shareholders is that the funds cost of leverage will be higher than it otherwise would have been had the auctions continued to be successful. As a result, the funds future Common share earnings may be lower than they otherwise would have been. To the extent that investments are purchased with the issuance of preferred shares, the funds net asset value will increase or decrease at a greater rate than a comparable unleveraged fund.
44
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) continued
The fund pays an annual service fee to broker-dealers with customers who are beneficial owners of the preferred shares. The service fee is equivalent to 0.25% of the applicable preferred share liquidation value while the preferred share auctions are successful or to 0.15% or less, varying by broker-dealer, while the auctions are failing. The APS are redeemable at the option of the fund in whole or in part at the redemption price equal to $25,000 per share, plus accumulated and unpaid dividends. The APS are also subject to mandatory redemption if certain requirements relating to its asset maintenance coverage are not satisfied. The fund is required to maintain certain asset coverage with respect to the APS as defined in the funds By-Laws and the Investment Company Act of 1940 and, as such is not permitted to declare common share dividends unless the funds APS have a minimum asset coverage ratio of 200% after declaration of the common share dividends.
45
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Trustees and Shareholders of the MFS Investment Grade Municipal Trust:
We have reviewed the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of the MFS Investment Grade Municipal Trust (the Fund), including the portfolio of investments, as of May 31, 2010, and the related statements of operations, changes in net assets, and financial highlights for the six-month period ended May 31, 2010. These interim financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Funds management.
We conducted our review in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.
Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the accompanying interim financial statements and financial highlights for them to be in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the statement of changes in net assets for the year ended November 30, 2009, and its financial highlights for each of the three years in the period then ended, and in our report dated January 15, 2010, we expressed an unqualified opinion on such statement of changes in net assets and financial highlights. The financial highlights for each of the two years in the period ended November 30, 2006 were audited by another independent registered public accounting firm whose report, dated January 25, 2007, expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial highlights.
Boston, Massachusetts
July 19, 2010
46
BOARD REVIEW OF INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT
A discussion regarding the Boards most recent review and renewal of the funds Investment Advisory Agreement with MFS is available by clicking on the funds name under Closed End Funds in the Products and Performance section of the MFS Web site (mfs.com).
PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND INFORMATION
A general description of the MFS funds proxy voting policies and procedures is available without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-225-2606, by visiting the Proxy Voting section of mfs.com or by visiting the SECs Web site at http://www.sec.gov.
Information regarding how the fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the twelve-month period ended June 30, 2009 is available without charge by visiting the Proxy Voting section of mfs.com or by visiting the SECs Web site at http://www.sec.gov.
QUARTERLY PORTFOLIO DISCLOSURE
The fund will file a complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission) for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The funds Form N-Q may be reviewed and copied at the:
Public Reference Room
Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, NE, Room 1580
Washington, D.C. 20549
Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330. The funds Form N-Q is available on the EDGAR database on the Commissions Internet Web site at http://www.sec.gov, and copies of this information may be obtained, upon payment of a duplicating fee, by electronic request at the following e-mail address: publicinfo@sec.gov or by writing the Public Reference Section at the above address.
A shareholder can also obtain the quarterly portfolio holdings report at mfs.com.
From time to time, MFS may post important information about the fund or the MFS funds on the MFS web site (mfs.com). This information is available by visiting the News & Commentary section of mfs.com or by clicking on the funds name under Closed End Funds in the Products and Performance section of mfs.com.
47
Transfer Agent, Registrar and
Dividend Disbursing Agent
Call
1-800-637-2304
9 a.m. to 5 p.m. Eastern time
Write
Computershare Trust Company, N.A.
P.O. Box 43078
Providence, RI 02940-3078
500 Boylston Street, Boston, MA 02116 | New York Stock Exchange Symbol: CXH |
ITEM 2. | CODE OF ETHICS. |
The Registrant has not amended any provision in its Code of Ethics (the Code) that relates to any element of the Codes definition enumerated in paragraph (b) of Item 2 of this Form N-CSR.
ITEM 3. | AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT. |
Not applicable for semi-annual reports.
ITEM 4. | PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES. |
Not applicable for semi-annual reports.
ITEM 5. | AUDIT COMMITTEE OF LISTED REGISTRANTS. |
Not applicable for semi-annual reports.
ITEM 6. | SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS |
A schedule of investments for each series of the Registrant is included as part of the report to shareholders of such series under Item 1 of this Form N-CSR.
ITEM 7. | DISCLOSURE OF PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES. |
Not applicable for semi-annual reports.
ITEM 8. | PORTFOLIO MANAGERS OF CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES. |
There were no changes during this period.
ITEM 9. | PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANY AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS. |
MFS Investment Grade Municipal Trust
Period |
(a) Total number of Shares Purchased |
(b) Average Price Paid per Share |
(c) Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs |
(d) Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased under the Plans or Programs | ||||
12/01/09-12/31/09 |
0 | N/A | 0 | 1,150,900 | ||||
1/01/10-1/31/10 |
0 | N/A | 0 | 1,150,900 | ||||
2/01/10-2/28/10 |
0 | N/A | 0 | 1,150,900 | ||||
3/01/10-3/31/10 |
0 | N/A | 0 | 1,150,900 | ||||
4/01/10-4/30/10 |
0 | N/A | 0 | 1,150,900 | ||||
5/01/10-5/31/10 |
0 | N/A | 0 | 1,150,900 | ||||
Total |
0 | 0 | ||||||
Note: The Board of Trustees approves procedures to repurchase shares annually. The notification to shareholders of the program is part of the semi-annual and annual reports sent to shareholders. These annual programs begin on March 1st of each year. The programs conform to the conditions of Rule 10b-18 of the securities Exchange Act of 1934 and limit the aggregate number of shares that may be purchased in each annual period (March 1 through the following February 28) to 10% of the Registrants outstanding shares as of the first day of the plan year (March 1). The aggregate number of shares available for purchase for the March 1, 2010 plan year is 1,150,900.
ITEM 10. | SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS. |
There were no material changes to the procedures by which shareholders may send recommendations to the Board for nominees to the Registrants Board since the Registrant last provided disclosure as to such procedures in response to the requirements of Item 407 (c)(2)(iv) of Regulation S-K or this Item.
ITEM 11. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES. |
(a) | Based upon their evaluation of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the Act)) as conducted within 90 days of the filing date of this Form N-CSR, the registrants principal financial officer and principal executive officer have concluded that those disclosure controls and procedures provide reasonable assurance that the material information required to be disclosed by the registrant on this report is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms. |
(b) | There were no changes in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Act) that occurred during the second fiscal quarter covered by the report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting. |
ITEM 12. | EXHIBITS. |
(a) | File the exhibits listed below as part of this form. Letter or number the exhibits in the sequence indicated. |
(1) | Any code of ethics, or amendment thereto, that is the subject of the disclosure required by Item 2, to the extent that the registrant intends to satisfy the Item 2 requirements through filing of an exhibit. |
(2) | A separate certification for each principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the registrant as required by Rule 30a-2 under the Act (17 CFR 270.30a-2): Attached hereto. |
(b) | If the report is filed under Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, provide the certifications required by Rule 30a-2(b) under the Act (17 CFR 270.30a-2(b)), Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13a-14(b) or 240.15d-14(b)) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350) as an exhibit. A certification furnished pursuant to this paragraph will not be deemed filed for the purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78r), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference: Attached hereto. |
Notice
A copy of the Agreement and Declaration of Trust, as amended, of the Registrant is on file with the Secretary of State of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and notice is hereby given that this instrument is executed on behalf of the Registrant by an officer of the Registrant as an officer and not individually and the obligations of or arising out of this instrument are not binding upon any of the Trustees or shareholders individually, but are binding only upon the assets and property of the respective constituent series of the Registrant.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Registrant MFS INVESTMENT GRADE MUNICIPAL TRUST
By (Signature and Title)* | MARIA F. DWYER | |
Maria F. Dwyer, President |
Date: July 19, 2010
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By (Signature and Title)* | MARIA F. DWYER | |
Maria F. Dwyer, President (Principal Executive Officer) |
Date: July 19, 2010
By (Signature and Title)* | JOHN M. CORCORAN | |
John M. Corcoran, Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer and Accounting Officer) |
Date: July 19, 2010
* | Print name and title of each signing officer under his or her signature. |