Form 10-Q
Table of Contents

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

 

 

FORM 10-Q

 

 

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2013

OR

 

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from              to             

Commission file number 0000-26251

 

 

NETSCOUT SYSTEMS, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

 

 

 

Delaware   04-2837575
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
  (IRS Employer
Identification No.)

310 Littleton Road, Westford, MA 01886

(978) 614-4000

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    YES  x    NO  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files.)    YES  x    NO  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

Large accelerated filer   x      Accelerated filer   ¨
Non-accelerated filer   ¨    (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)    Smaller reporting company   ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    YES  ¨    NO  x

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share, as of July 26, 2013 was 41,372,757.

 

 

 


Table of Contents

NETSCOUT SYSTEMS, INC.

FORM 10-Q

FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2013

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

PART I: FINANCIAL INFORMATION

  

Item 1.

   Unaudited Financial Statements:   
   Consolidated Balance Sheets:   
  

As of June 30, 2013 and March 31, 2013

     3   
   Consolidated Statements of Operations:   
  

For the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012

     4   
   Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income:   
  

For the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012

     5   
   Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows:   
  

For the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012

     6   
   Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements      7   

Item 2.

   Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations      22   

Item 3.

   Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk      33   

Item 4.

   Controls and Procedures      33   

PART II: OTHER INFORMATION

  

Item 1.

   Legal Proceedings      35   

Item 1A.

   Risk Factors      35   

Item 2.

   Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds      35   

Item 6.

   Exhibits      36   

SIGNATURES

     37   

EXHIBIT INDEX

     38   

 

2


Table of Contents

PART I: FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Unaudited Financial Statements

NetScout Systems, Inc.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(In thousands, except share and per share data)

 

     June 30,
2013
    March 31,
2013
 
     (unaudited)        
Assets     

Current assets:

    

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 102,727      $ 99,930   

Marketable securities

     46,333        37,338   

Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $897 and $971 at June 30, 2013 and March 31, 2013, respectively

     50,922        73,900   

Inventories

     10,940        7,563   

Prepaid income taxes

     1,523        —     

Deferred income taxes

     9,581        9,538   

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

     7,215        9,043   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total current assets

     229,241        237,312   

Fixed assets, net

     20,565        19,678   

Goodwill

     202,582        202,453   

Intangible assets, net

     62,317        63,827   

Deferred income taxes

     8,751        9,211   

Long-term marketable securities

     13,762        16,823   

Other assets

     2,439        2,872   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total assets

   $ 539,657      $ 552,176   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity     

Current liabilities:

    

Accounts payable

   $ 12,130      $ 10,161   

Accrued compensation

     20,132        31,585   

Accrued other

     6,671        8,256   

Income taxes payable

     0        114   

Deferred revenue

     93,749        95,055   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total current liabilities

     132,682        145,171   

Other long-term liabilities

     2,670        2,249   

Deferred tax liability

     950        941   

Accrued long-term retirement benefits

     1,747        1,757   

Long-term deferred revenue

     24,087        25,907   

Contingent liabilities, net of current portion

     4,068        4,248   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities

     166,204        180,273   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Commitments and contingencies (Note 12)

    

Stockholders’ equity:

    

Preferred stock, $0.001 par value:
5,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued or outstanding at June 30, 2013 and March 31, 2013

     0        0   

Common stock, $0.001 par value:
150,000,000 shares authorized; 49,237,454 and 49,007,491 shares issued and 41,381,368 and 41,466,921 shares outstanding at June 30, 2013 and March 31, 2013, respectively

     49        49   

Additional paid-in capital

     256,762        253,202   

Accumulated other comprehensive income

     878        671   

Treasury stock at cost, 7,856,086 and 7,540,570 shares at June 30, 2013 and March 31, 2013, respectively

     (90,950     (83,480

Retained earnings

     206,714        201,461   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total stockholders’ equity

     373,453        371,903   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

   $ 539,657      $ 552,176   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

3


Table of Contents

NetScout Systems, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Operations

(In thousands, except per share data)

(Unaudited)

 

     Three Months Ended
June 30,
 
     2013     2012  

Revenue:

    

Product

   $ 42,977      $ 40,262   

Service

     38,828        36,099   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total revenue

     81,805        76,361   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cost of revenue:

    

Product

     9,773        10,070   

Service

     7,149        6,793   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total cost of revenue

     16,922        16,863   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Gross profit

     64,883        59,498   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Operating expenses:

    

Research and development

     15,965        14,077   

Sales and marketing

     32,200        30,149   

General and administrative

     6,981        6,557   

Amortization of acquired intangible assets

     854        586   

Restructuring charges

     0        (87
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total operating expenses

     56,000        51,282   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income from operations

     8,883        8,216   

Interest and other (expense) income, net:

    

Interest income

     87        116   

Interest expense

     (190     (296

Other income (expense), net

     30        (176
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total interest and other (expense) income, net

     (73     (356
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income before income tax expense

     8,810        7,860   

Income tax expense

     3,557        2,852   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income

   $ 5,253      $ 5,008   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Basic net income per share

   $ 0.13      $ 0.12   

Diluted net income per share

   $ 0.12      $ 0.12   

Weighted average common shares outstanding used in computing:

    

Net income per share – basic

     41,405        41,742   

Net income per share – diluted

     42,068        42,453   

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

4


Table of Contents

NetScout Systems, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)

 

     Three Months Ended
June 30,
 
     2013     2012  

Net income

   $ 5,253      $ 5,008   

Other comprehensive income (loss):

    

Cumulative translation adjustments

     291        (1,074

Changes in market value of investments:

    

Changes in unrealized gains/(losses), net of taxes (benefits) of $0 and $73

     (35     84   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total net change in market value of investments

     (35     84   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Changes in market value of derivatives:

    

Changes in market value of derivatives, net of taxes (benefits) of ($82) and $(167)

     (116     (271

Reclassification adjustment for net losses (gains) included in net income, net of benefits (taxes) of $39 and $70

     67        113   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total net change in market value of derivatives

     (49     (158
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Other comprehensive income (loss)

     207        (1,148
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Comprehensive income

   $ 5,460      $ 3,860   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

5


Table of Contents

NetScout Systems, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)

 

     Three Months Ended
June 30,
 
     2013     2012  

Cash flows from operating activities:

    

Net income

   $ 5,253      $ 5,008   

Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities, net of the effects of acquisitions:

    

Depreciation and amortization

     4,859        4,375   

Loss on disposal of fixed assets

     24        24   

Deal related compensation expense and accretion charges

     36        76   

Share-based compensation expense associated with equity awards

     2,812        2,247   

Net change in fair value of contingent and contractual liabilities

     (264     135   

Deferred income taxes

     618        2,434   

Other (losses) gains

     (7     7   

Changes in assets and liabilities

    

Accounts receivable

     22,988        30,911   

Inventories

     (5,158     (56

Prepaid expenses and other assets

     744        142   

Accounts payable

     1,970        914   

Accrued compensation and other expenses

     (11,999     (4,718

Income taxes payable

     (114     —     

Deferred revenue

     (3,149     (5,375
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

     18,613        36,124   

Cash flows from investing activities:

    

Purchase of marketable securities

     (18,081     (58,671

Proceeds from maturity of marketable securities

     12,112        50,882   

Purchase of fixed assets

     (2,380     (2,721

Increase in deposits

     (46     —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash used in investing activities

     (8,395     (10,510

Cash flows from financing activities:

    

Issuance of common stock under stock plans

     213        14   

Payment of contingent consideration

     (841     (1,516

Treasury stock repurchases

     (7,470     (6,413

Excess tax benefit from share-based compensation awards

     727        54   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash used in financing activities

     (7,371     (7,861

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

     (50     17   

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents

     2,797        17,770   

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period

     99,930        117,255   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period

   $ 102,727      $ 135,025   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Supplemental disclosure of non-cash activities:

    

Cash paid for interest

   $ 0      $ 248   

Cash paid for income taxes

   $ 3,795      $ 973   

Non-cash transactions:

    

Transfers of inventory to fixed assets

   $ 1,781      $ 583   

Additions to property, plant and equipment included in accounts payable

   $ 3      $ 232   

Gross decrease in contractual liability relating to fair value adjustment

   $ (49   $ (135

Gross (decrease) increase in contingent consideration liability relating to fair value adjustment

   $ (215   $ 270   

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

6


Table of Contents

NetScout Systems, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

NOTE 1 – BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared by NetScout Systems, Inc., or NetScout or the Company. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared under generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). In the opinion of management, the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements include all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair statement of the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows. The year-end consolidated balance sheet data was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The results reported in these consolidated financial statements are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for the entire year. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements, including the notes thereto, included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In July 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2013-11, Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists (ASU 2013-11). ASU 2013-11 clarifies guidance and eliminates diversity in practice on the presentation of unrecognized tax benefits when a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward exists at the reporting date. This new guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2013 and subsequent interim periods. The Company is currently assessing the impact, if any, on the condensed consolidated financial statements.

In March 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2013-05 Foreign Currency Matters (Topic 830): Parent’s Accounting for the Cumulative Translation Adjustment upon Derecognition of Certain Subsidiaries or Groups of Assets within a Foreign Entity or of an Investment in a Foreign Entity (ASU 2013-05). ASU 2013-05 provides guidance on releasing cumulative translation adjustments when a reporting entity (parent) ceases to have a controlling financial interest in a subsidiary or a business within a foreign entity. ASU 2013-05 is effective on a prospective basis for fiscal years and interim reporting periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013 (the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2014 for the Company). Early adoption is permitted. This standard is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

In February 2013, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2013-02: Other Comprehensive Income (ASU 2013-02). ASU 2013-02 provides additional guidance regarding reclassifications out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (AOCI). The new guidance requires entities to report the effect of significant reclassifications out of AOCI on the respective line items in net income unless the amounts are not reclassified in their entirety to net income. For amounts that are not required to be reclassified in their entirety to net income in the same reporting period, entities are required to cross-reference other disclosures that provide additional detail about those amounts. The new guidance is effective prospectively for all interim and annual periods beginning April 1, 2013 with early adoption permitted. On April 1, 2013, the Company adopted ASU 2013-02. While the new guidance in ASU 2013-02 changes the presentation of ACOI, there are no changes to the components that are recognized in net income or AOCI under current accounting guidance.

In January 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-01, Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities (ASU 2013-01). ASU 2013-01 contains no amendments to disclosure requirements. The amendments clarify that the scope of ASU 2011-11, Disclosures about Offsetting

 

7


Table of Contents

Assets and Liabilities, which introduced new disclosure requirements, applies to derivatives accounted for in accordance with Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, including bifurcated embedded derivatives, repurchase agreements and reverse repurchase agreements, and securities borrowing and securities lending transactions that are either offset in accordance with Section 210-20-45 or Section 815-10-45 or subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement or similar agreement. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements as these updates have an impact on presentation only.

NOTE 2 – CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK AND SIGNIFICANT CUSTOMERS

Financial instruments that potentially subject us to concentration of credit risk consist primarily of investments, trade accounts receivable and accounts payable. Our cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities are placed with financial institutions with high credit standings.

At June 30, 2013 and March 31, 2013, the Company had one customer that accounted for more than 10% of the accounts receivable balance. During the three months ended June 30, 2013, one direct customer accounted for more than 10% of our total revenue, while no one indirect channel partner accounted for more than 10% of total revenue. During the three months ended June 30, 2012, no direct customer or indirect channel partner accounted for more than 10% of our total revenue. Historically, the Company has not experienced any significant failure of its customers to meet their payment obligations nor does the Company anticipate material non-performance by its customers in the future; accordingly, the Company does not require collateral from its customers. However, if the Company’s assumptions are incorrect, there could be an adverse impact on its allowance for doubtful accounts.

NOTE 3 – SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION

The following is a summary of share-based compensation expense including restricted stock units and employee stock purchases made under our employee stock purchase plan (ESPP) based on estimated fair values within the applicable cost and expense lines identified below (in thousands):

 

     Three Months Ended
June 30,
 
     2013      2012  

Cost of product revenue

   $ 44       $ 49   

Cost of service revenue

     146         66   

Research and development

     896         644   

Sales and marketing

     845         718   

General and administrative

     881         770   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 
   $ 2,812       $ 2,247   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Employee Stock Purchase Plan – The Company maintains an ESPP for all eligible employees as described in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2013. Under the ESPP, shares of the Company’s common stock may be purchased on the last day of each bi-annual offering period at 85% of the fair value on the last day of such offering period. The offering periods run from March 1 through August 31 and from September 1 through February 28 of each year.

NOTE 4 – CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND MARKETABLE SECURITIES

The Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents and those investments with original maturities greater than three months to be marketable securities. Cash and cash equivalents consisted of money market instruments and cash maintained with various financial institutions at June 30, 2013 and March 31, 2013.

 

8


Table of Contents

Marketable Securities

The following is a summary of marketable securities held by NetScout at June 30, 2013 classified as short-term and long-term (in thousands):

 

     Amortized
Cost
     Unrealized
Gains (Losses)
    Fair Value  

Type of security:

       

U.S. government and municipal obligations

   $ 27,603       $ (19   $ 27,584   

Commercial paper

     7,093         0        7,093   

Corporate bonds

     6,687         3        6,690   

Certificates of deposit

     4,966         0        4,966   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total short-term marketable securities

     46,349         (16     46,333   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

U.S. government and municipal obligations

     10,640         1        10,641   

Corporate bonds

     3,121         0        3,121   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total long-term marketable securities

     13,761         1        13,762   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total marketable securities

   $ 60,110       $ (15   $ 60,095   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

The following is a summary of marketable securities held by NetScout at March 31, 2013, classified as short-term and long-term (in thousands):

 

     Amortized
Cost
     Unrealized
Gains
     Fair Value  

Type of security:

        

U.S. government and municipal obligations

   $ 17,416       $ 11       $ 17,427   

Commercial paper

     12,390         0         12,390   

Corporate bonds

     2,559         2         2,561   

Certificates of deposit

     4,960         0         4,960   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total short-term marketable securities

     37,325         13         37,338   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

U.S. government and municipal obligations

     14,211         7         14,218   

Corporate bonds

     2,605         0         2,605   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total long-term marketable securities

     16,816         7         16,823   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total marketable securities

   $ 54,141       $ 20       $ 54,161   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Contractual maturities of the Company’s marketable securities held at June 30, 2013 and March 31, 2013 were as follows (in thousands):

 

     June 30, 2013      March 31, 2013  

Available-for-sale securities:

     

Due in 1 year or less

   $ 46,333       $ 37,338   

Due after 1 year through 5 years

     13,762         16,823   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 
   $ 60,095       $ 54,161   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

9


Table of Contents

NOTE 5 – FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

The following tables present the Company’s financial assets and liabilities measured on a recurring basis using the fair value hierarchy as of June 30, 2013 and March 31, 2013. The fair value hierarchy has three levels based on the reliability of the inputs used to determine fair value. Level 1 refers to fair values determined based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets. Level 2 refers to fair values estimated using significant other observable inputs, and Level 3 includes fair values estimated using significant non-observable inputs.

 

     Fair Value Measurements at
June 30, 2013 (in thousands)
 
     Level 1      Level 2     Level 3     Total  

ASSETS:

         

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 102,727       $ 0      $ 0      $ 102,727   

U.S. government and municipal obligations

     38,225         0        0        38,225   

Commercial paper

     0         7,093        0        7,093   

Corporate bonds

     9,811         0        0        9,811   

Certificate of deposits

     0         4,966        0        4,966   

Derivative financial instruments

     0         40        0        40   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   $ 150,763       $ 12,099      $ 0      $ 162,862   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

LIABILITIES:

         

Contingent purchase consideration

   $ 0       $ 0      $ (4,068   $ (4,068

Contingent contractual non-compliance liability

     0         0        (197     (197

Derivative financial instruments

     0         (303     0        (303
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   $ 0       $ (303   $ (4,265   $ (4,568
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

     Fair Value Measurements at
March 31, 2013 (in thousands)
 
     Level 1      Level 2     Level 3     Total  

ASSETS:

         

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 99,930       $ 0      $ 0      $ 99,930   

U.S. government and municipal obligations

     31,645         0        0        31,645   

Commercial paper

     0         12,390        0        12,390   

Corporate bonds

     5,166         0        0        5,166   

Certificate of deposits

     0         4,960        0        4,960   

Derivative financial instruments

     0         71        0        71   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   $ 136,741       $ 17,421      $ 0      $ 154,162   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

LIABILITIES:

         

Contingent purchase consideration

   $ 0       $ 0      $ (5,087   $ (5,087

Contingent contractual non-compliance liability

     0         0        (246     (246

Derivative financial instruments

     0         (249     0        (249
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   $ 0       $ (249   $ (5,333   $ (5,582
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

This hierarchy requires the Company to use observable market data, when available, and to minimize the use of unobservable inputs when determining fair value. On a recurring basis, the Company measures certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value, including marketable securities and derivative financial instruments.

The Company’s Level 1 investments are classified as such because they are valued using quoted market prices or alternative pricing sources with reasonable levels of price transparency.

The Company’s Level 2 investments are classified as such because fair value is being calculated using data from similar but not identical sources, or a discounted cash flow model using the contractual interest rate as

 

10


Table of Contents

compared to the underlying interest yield curve. The Company’s derivative financial instruments consist of forward foreign exchange contracts and are classified as Level 2 because the fair values of these derivatives are determined using models based on market observable inputs, including spot prices for foreign currencies and credit derivatives, as well as an interest rate factor. Commercial paper and certificate of deposits are classified as Level 2 because the Company uses market information from similar but not identical instruments and discounted cash flow models based on interest rate yield curves to determine fair value. For further information on the Company’s derivative instruments refer to Note 9.

The Company’s contingent purchase consideration and contingent contractual non-compliance liability at June 30, 2013 and March 31, 2013 were classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy. They are valued by probability weighting expected payment scenarios and then applying a discount based on the present value of the future cash flow streams. The Company has elected to account for the contractual non-compliance liability at fair value. This election has been made as both contingent liabilities are related. The fair value election created parity between the two items during the settlement period. These liabilities are classified as Level 3 because the probability weighting of future payment scenarios is based on assumptions developed by management.

The following table sets forth a reconciliation of changes in the fair value of the Company’s Level 3 financial assets for the three months ended June 30, 2013 (in thousands):

 

     Contingent
Purchase
Consideration
    Contingent
Contractual
Non-compliance
Liability
 

Balance at beginning of period

   $ (5,087   $ (246

Change in fair value (included within research and development expense)

     178        49   

Payments

     841        0   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance at end of period

   $ (4,068   $ (197
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

The Company has updated the probabilities used in the fair value calculation of the contingent liabilities at June 30, 2013 which resulted in reduced liabilities of $264 thousand included as part of earnings for the three months ended June 30, 2013. The fair value of the contingent purchase consideration was estimated by applying a probability based model, which utilizes significant inputs that are unobservable in the market. Key assumptions include a 3.3% discount rate and a percent weighted-probability of the settlement of the contingent contractual non-compliance liability. Deal related compensation expense, accretion charges and changes related to settlements of contractual non-compliance liabilities for the three months ended June 30, 2013 were $37 thousand and were included as part of earnings.

During the three months ended June 30, 2013, $841 thousand related to the contingent purchase consideration as part of the acquisition of Simena, LLC (Simena) was paid to the former owner.

NOTE 6 – INVENTORIES

Inventories are stated at the lower of actual cost or net realizable value. Cost is determined by using the first in, first out (FIFO) method. Inventories consist of the following (in thousands):

 

     June 30,
2013
     March 31,
2013
 

Raw materials

   $ 6,034       $ 3,986   

Work in process

     222         272   

Finished goods

     4,684         3,305   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 
   $ 10,940       $ 7,563   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

11


Table of Contents

NOTE 7 – ACQUISITIONS

While the Company uses its best estimates and assumptions as part of the purchase price allocation process to value the assets acquired and liabilities assumed on the acquisition date, its estimates and assumptions are subject to refinement. As a result, during the preliminary purchase price allocation period, which may be up to one year from the acquisition date, the Company records adjustments to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed with a corresponding offset to goodwill. The Company records adjustments to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed subsequent to the purchase price allocation period in the Company’s operating results in the period in which the adjustments were determined. The results of operations of the acquired businesses described below have been included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements beginning on their respective acquisition dates unless indicated otherwise below.

ONPATH

On October 31, 2012, the Company acquired ONPATH Technologies, Inc. (ONPATH), an established provider of scalable packet flow switching technology for high-performance networks for the aggregation and distribution of network traffic for data, voice, video testing, monitoring, performance management and cybersecurity deployments. ONPATH’s packet flow switch technology is synergistic with the Company’s network monitoring switch strategy. The acquisition of the packet flow switch technology further strengthens the Company’s Unified Service Delivery Management strategy by enabling scalable access to all relevant network traffic across highly distributed network environments for use by any network monitoring, performance management and security system. ONPATH’s test automation technology is used to monitor networks in test environments which simulate existing and planned network environments. The results of ONPATH’s operations have been included in the consolidated financial statements since October 31, 2012. The total cash transferred and to be transferred of $41.0 million consisted entirely of cash consideration, of which $8.2 million will be paid to employees and directors of ONPATH pursuant to ONPATH’s transaction bonus and retention plan. Approximately $4.0 million of the transaction bonuses are considered compensation and are therefore not included as consideration within the table below.

The following table summarizes the allocation of the purchase price (in thousands):

 

Allocation of the purchase consideration:

  

Current assets, including cash and cash equivalents of $527

   $ 8,356   

Fixed assets

     784   

Identifiable intangible assets

     10,970   

Goodwill

     20,441   

Deferred tax asset

     6,812   

Other assets

     1,432   
  

 

 

 

Total assets acquired

     48,795   

Current liabilities

     (6,414

Deferred revenue

     (921

Deferred income tax liabilities

     (4,660
  

 

 

 
   $ 36,800   
  

 

 

 

Goodwill was recognized for the excess purchase price over the fair value of the assets acquired. Goodwill of $17.4 million from the ONPATH acquisition was included within the Company’s existing Unified Service Delivery reporting unit and $3.0 million was included within the Test Automation reporting unit. Both reporting units resulting from the acquisition of ONPATH were included in the Company’s annual impairment review on January 31, 2013.

The fair values of intangible assets were based on valuations using an income approach, with estimates and assumptions provided by management of ONPATH and the Company. These assumptions include estimates of

 

12


Table of Contents

future revenues associated with the technology purchased as part of the acquisition and the migration of the current technology to more advanced version of the software. This fair value measurement was based on significant inputs not observable in the market and thus represents Level 3 fair value measurements. The following table reflects the fair value of the acquired identifiable intangible assets and related estimates of useful lives (in thousands):

 

     Fair Value      Useful Life
(Years)

Developed technology

   $ 4,970       8

Customer relationships

     6,000       7
  

 

 

    
   $ 10,970      
  

 

 

    

The weighted average useful life of identifiable intangible assets acquired from ONPATH is 7.5 years. Acquired software is amortized using an accelerated amortization method. Customer relationships are amortized on a straight-line basis.

Goodwill and intangible assets recorded as part of the ONPATH acquisition are not deductible for tax purposes.

The Company notes that it acquired significant net operating losses from ONPATH. ONPATH has represented to the Company that there were no historical changes in control that would limit NetScout’s ability to utilize these net operating losses in its consolidated federal return. During the fourth quarter of the Company’s fiscal year ended March 31, 2013, the Company completed a 382 study with its tax advisors and concluded that ONPATH’s representations were correct. The Company also notes that ONPATH did not claim research and development credits for historical tax returns. NetScout believes that certain ONPATH activities qualify for a research and development credit, and will perform analysis on the historical periods to identify and claim credits for historical research and development activities. No credit has been recorded within the acquisition allocation. Adjustments to research and development credits made within one year of acquisition will be recorded against goodwill, except for any portion related to the periods covered by the research and development credit extension enacted in January of 2013.

Accanto

On July 20, 2012, the Company acquired certain assets, technology and employees of Accanto Systems, S.r.l. (Accanto), a supplier of service assurance solutions for telecommunication service providers which enables carriers to monitor and manage the delivery of voice services over converged, next generation telecom architectures. Accanto’s technology is synergistic with the Company’s packet flow strategy and brings voice service monitoring capabilities for legacy environments and for next generation network voice services. The Company maintains a relationship with the selling entity such that the selling entity serves as a distributor for the Company. The results of Accanto’s operations, related to those assets, technology and employees acquired, have been included in the consolidated financial statements since that date. The total purchase price of $15.0 million consisted entirely of cash consideration. The goodwill recognized primarily relates to the value in combining Accanto’s product with our customer base.

 

13


Table of Contents

The following table summarizes the allocation of the purchase price (in thousands):

 

Allocation of the purchase consideration:

  

Current assets

   $ 389   

Fixed assets

     237   

Identifiable intangible assets

     5,280   

Goodwill

     11,157   
  

 

 

 

Total assets acquired

     17,063   

Current liabilities

     (839

Deferred revenue

     (240

Deferred income tax liabilities

     (984
  

 

 

 
   $ 15,000   
  

 

 

 

Goodwill was recognized for the excess purchase price over the fair value of the assets acquired. Goodwill from the Accanto acquisition is included within the Company’s Unified Service Delivery reporting unit and was included in the Company’s annual impairment review. The acquired software intangible had a tax basis of approximately $2.1 million which carried over as part of the acquisition and will be deductible for tax purposes. The remaining value of the acquired software intangible asset and the full value of the customer relationship intangible asset and goodwill is not deductible for tax purposes.

The fair values of intangible assets were based on valuations using an income approach, with estimates and assumptions provided by management of Accanto and the Company. These assumptions include estimates of future revenues associated with the technology purchased as part of the acquisition and the migration of the current technology to more advanced versions of the software. This fair value measurement was based on significant inputs not observable in the market and thus represents Level 3 fair value measurements. The following table reflects the fair value of the acquired identifiable intangible assets and related estimates of useful lives (in thousands):

 

     Fair Value      Useful Life
(Years)

Developed technology

   $ 3,500       8

Distributor relationships

     1,780       6
  

 

 

    
   $ 5,280      
  

 

 

    

The weighted average useful life of identifiable intangible assets acquired from Accanto is 7.3 years. Acquired software is amortized using an accelerated amortization method. Distributor relationships are amortized on a straight-line basis.

 

14


Table of Contents

The following table presents unaudited pro forma results of the historical Consolidated Statements of Operations of the Company, ONPATH and Accanto for the three months ended June 30, 2012, giving effect to the mergers as if they occurred on April 1, 2012 (in thousands, except per share data):

 

     Three Months
Ended June 30,
2012
 

Pro forma revenue

   $ 81,295   

Pro forma net income

   $ 1,482   

Pro forma income per share

  

Basic

   $ 0.04   

Diluted

   $ 0.03   

Pro forma shares outstanding

  

Basic

     41,742   

Diluted

     42,453   

The pro forma results for the three months ended June 30, 2012 primarily includes adjustments for amortization of intangibles. This pro forma information does not purport to indicate the results that would have actually been obtained had the acquisition been completed on the assumed date, or which may be realized in the future.

During the three months ended June 30, 2013, the Company has recorded $5.0 million of revenue directly attributable to ONPATH and Accanto within its consolidated financial statements.

NOTE 8 – GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Goodwill

The Company has two reporting units: (1) Unified Service Delivery and (2) Test Automation. As of June 30, 2013 and March 31, 2013, goodwill attributable to the Unified Service Delivery reporting unit was $199.6 million and $199.5 million, respectively. Goodwill attributable to the Test Automation reporting unit was $3.0 million as of both June 30, 2013 and March 31, 2013. Goodwill is tested for impairment at a reporting unit level at least annually, or on an interim basis if an event occurs or circumstances change that would, more likely than not, reduce the fair value of the reporting segment below its carrying value.

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the three months ended June 30, 2013 are due to purchase accounting adjustments and the impact of foreign currency translation adjustments related to asset balances that are recorded in non-U.S. currencies.

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the three months ended June 30, 2013 are as follows (in thousands):

 

Balance as of March 31, 2013

   $ 202,453   

Purchase accounting adjustments

     (149

Foreign currency translation impact

     278   
  

 

 

 

Balance as of June 30, 2013

   $ 202,582   
  

 

 

 

 

15


Table of Contents

Intangible Assets

The net carrying amounts of intangible assets were $62.3 million and $63.8 million as of June 30, 2013 and March 31, 2013, respectively. Intangible assets acquired in a business combination are recorded under the acquisition method of accounting at their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition. The Company amortizes intangible assets over their estimated useful lives, except for the acquired trade name which resulted from the Network General Central Corporation (Network General) acquisition, which has an indefinite life and thus is not amortized. The carrying value of the indefinite lived trade name is evaluated for potential impairment annually or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired.

Intangible assets include an indefinite lived trade name with a carrying value of $18.6 million and the following amortizable intangible assets as of June 30, 2013 (in thousands):

 

     Cost      Accumulated
Amortization
    Net  

Developed technology

   $ 30,898       $ (21,868   $ 9,030   

Customer relationships

     38,731         (11,787     26,944   

Distributor relationships

     1,915         (301     1,614   

Core technology

     7,467         (1,761     5,706   

Non-compete agreements

     338         (197     141   

Other

     595         (313     282   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 
   $ 79,944       $ (36,227   $ 43,717   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Intangible assets include an indefinite lived trade name with a carrying value of $18.6 million and the following amortizable intangible assets as of March 31, 2013 (in thousands):

 

     Cost      Accumulated
Amortization
    Net  

Developed technology

   $ 30,848       $ (21,343   $ 9,505   

Customer relationships

     38,718         (11,038     27,680   

Distributor relationships

     1,895         (219     1,676   

Core technology

     7,446         (1,455     5,991   

Non-compete agreements

     334         (167     167   

Other

     483         (275     208   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 
   $ 79,724       $ (34,497   $ 45,227   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Amortization of software and core technology included as cost of product revenue was $819 thousand and $1.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Amortization of other intangible assets included as operating expense was $854 thousand and $635 thousand for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

The following is the expected future amortization expense as of June 30, 2013 for the years ended March 31 (in thousands):

 

2014 (remaining nine months)

   $ 5,102   

2015

     6,874   

2016

     6,357   

2017

     5,775   

2018

     4,995   

Thereafter

     14,614   
  

 

 

 
   $ 43,717   
  

 

 

 

 

16


Table of Contents

The weighted average amortization period of acquired software and core technology is 6.7 years. The weighted average amortization period for customer relationships is 13.3 years. The weighted average amortization period for amortizing intangibles is 10.1 years.

NOTE 9 – DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES

NetScout operates internationally and, in the normal course of business, is exposed to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. The exposures result from costs that are denominated in currencies other than the U.S. Dollar, primarily the Euro, British Pound, Canadian Dollar, and Indian Rupee. The Company manages its foreign cash flow risk by hedging forecasted cash flows for operating expenses denominated in foreign currencies for up to twelve months, within specified guidelines through the use of forward contracts. The Company enters into foreign currency exchange contracts to hedge cash flow exposures from costs that are denominated in currencies other than the U.S. Dollar. These hedges are designated as cash flow hedges at inception.

All of the Company’s derivative instruments are utilized for risk management purposes, and the Company does not use derivatives for speculative trading purposes. These contracts will mature over the next twelve months and are expected to impact earnings on or before maturity.

The notional amounts and fair values of derivative instruments in the consolidated balance sheets as of June 30, 2013 and March 31, 2013 were as follows (in thousands):

 

     Notional Amounts(a)      Other Current Assets      Accrued Other Liabilities  
     June 30,
2013
     March 31,
2013
     June 30,
2013
     March 31,
2013
     June 30,
2013
     March 31,
2013
 

Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments:

                 

Forward contracts

   $ 10,313       $ 17,071       $ 40       $ 71       $ 303       $ 249   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

(a) Notional amounts represent the gross contract/notional amount of the derivatives outstanding.

The following table provides the effect foreign exchange forward contracts had on other comprehensive income (loss) (OCI) and results of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012 (in thousands):

 

Derivatives in Cash

Flow Hedging

Relationships

  Effective Portion    

Ineffective Portion

 
  Gain (Loss) Recognized
in OCI on Derivative

(a)
   

Gain (Loss) Reclassified from
Accumulated OCI into Income

(b)

   

Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income (Amount
Excluded from Effectiveness Testing)

(c)

 
  June 30,
      2013      
    June 30,
      2012      
   

Location

  June 30,
2013
    June 30,
2012
   

      Location      

  June 30,
      2013      
    June 30,
      2012      
 

Forward contracts

  $ (198   $ 439      Research and development   $ 16      $ 148      Research and development   $ (68   $ (40
      Sales and marketing     90        35      Sales and marketing     (1     (2
 

 

 

   

 

 

     

 

 

   

 

 

     

 

 

   

 

 

 
  $ (198   $ 439        $ 106      $ 183        $ (69   $ (42
 

 

 

   

 

 

     

 

 

   

 

 

     

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

(a) The amount represents the change in fair value of derivative contracts due to changes in spot rates.
(b) The amount represents reclassification from other comprehensive income to earnings that occurs when the hedged item affects earnings.
(c) The amount represents the change in fair value of derivative contracts due to changes in the difference between the spot price and forward price that is excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness and therefore recognized in earnings. No gains or losses were reclassified as a result of discontinuance of cash flow hedges.

 

17


Table of Contents

NOTE 10 – LONG-TERM DEBT

On October 29, 2012, the Company paid down its outstanding balance in the amount of $62.0 million on its credit facility. As of June 30, 2013 there were no amounts outstanding under this credit facility.

On November 22, 2011, the Company entered into a credit facility (the Credit Agreement) with a syndicate of lenders led by KeyBank National Association (KeyBank) providing the Company with a $250 million revolving credit facility, which may be increased to $300 million at any time up to 90 days before maturity. The revolving credit facility includes a swing line loan sub-facility of up to $10 million and a letter of credit sub-facility of up to $10 million. The credit facility under the Credit Agreement matures on November 21, 2016.

At the Company’s election, revolving loans under the Credit Agreement bear interest at either (a) a rate per annum equal to the highest of (1) KeyBank’s prime rate, (2) 0.50% in excess of the federal funds effective rate, or (3) one hundred (100.00) basis points in excess of the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) for one-month interest periods, or the Base Rate as defined in the Credit Agreement; or (b) the one-, two-, three-, or six-month per annum LIBOR, as selected by the Company, multiplied by the statutory reserve adjustment, or collectively, the Eurodollar Rate, in each case plus an applicable margin. Swing line loans will bear interest at the Base Rate plus the applicable Base Rate margin. Beginning with the delivery of the Company’s financial statements for the quarter ended December 31, 2011, the applicable margin began to depend on the Company’s leverage ratio, ranging from 100 basis points for Base Rate loans and 200 basis points for Eurodollar Rate loans if the Company’s consolidated leverage ratio is 2.50 to 1.00 or higher, down to 25 basis points for Base Rate loans and 125 basis points for Eurodollar Rate loans if the Company’s consolidated leverage ratio is 1.00 to 1.00 or less.

The Company may prepay loans under the Credit Agreement at any time, without penalty, subject to certain notice requirements. Debt is recorded at the amount drawn on the revolving credit facility plus interest based on floating rates reflective of changes in the market which approximates fair value.

The loans are guaranteed by each of the Company’s domestic subsidiaries and are collateralized by all of the assets of the Company and its domestic subsidiaries, as well as 65% of the capital stock of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries directly owned by the Company and its domestic subsidiaries. The Credit Agreement generally prohibits any other liens on the assets of the Company and its subsidiaries, subject to certain exceptions as described in the Credit Agreement. The Credit Agreement contains certain covenants applicable to the Company and its subsidiaries, including, without limitation, limitations on additional indebtedness, liens, various fundamental changes (including material mergers and dispositions of assets), dividends and distributions, capital expenditures, investments (including material acquisitions and investments in foreign subsidiaries), transactions with affiliates, sale-leaseback transactions, hedge agreements, payment of junior financing, material changes in business, and other limitations customary in senior secured credit facilities. In addition, the Company is required to maintain certain consolidated leverage and interest coverage ratios as well as a minimum liquidity amount. As of June 30, 2013, the Company was in compliance with all of these covenants.

NOTE 11 – RESTRUCTURING CHARGES

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013, the Company restructured part of its international sales organization related to an overlap of personnel acquired as part of the Accanto acquisition. The Company recorded $1.2 million of restructuring charges related to severance costs.

 

18


Table of Contents

The following table provides a summary of the activity related to these restructuring plans and the related liability included as accrued compensation on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet (in thousands):

 

     Employee
Severance
 

Balance at March 31, 2013

   $ 910   

Cash payments

     (125
  

 

 

 

Balance at June 30, 2013

   $ 785   
  

 

 

 

The balance is expected to be paid in full by September 30, 2013.

NOTE 12 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Acquisition relatedThe Company recorded two contingent liabilities related to the acquisition of Simena, one relates to future consideration to be paid to the former owner which had an initial fair value of $8.0 million at the time of acquisition and another relates to contractual non-compliance liabilities incurred by Simena with an initial fair value of $1.6 million at the time of acquisition. At June 30, 2013, the present value of the future consideration was $4.1 million and the contractual non-compliance liability was $197 thousand.

Legal From time to time, NetScout is subject to legal proceedings and claims in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, the amount of ultimate expense with respect to any current legal proceedings and claims, if determined adversely, will not have a significant adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

In March 2012, NetScout uncovered and investigated, and in April 2012, disclosed to the U.S. Department of Justice and the California State Attorney General potential violations of federal and California state anti-trust laws. The potential violations involve a former employee and one or more third parties in connection with sales to state governmental agencies during fiscal year 2012. NetScout believes it did not benefit from any of the transactions uncovered and believes that the amounts involved are not material. The California State Attorney General is conducting an investigation into the matter. NetScout is cooperating fully and is providing all requested information. In general, the federal and state agencies have the authority to seek fines and other remedies for anti-trust violations; however, no charges or proceedings have been initiated by any governmental agency against NetScout, and the Company has been informed by the Department of Justice that it does not intend to take any action against NetScout. The Company determined that it is probable that there will be amounts due, those amounts are reasonably estimable and have been accrued as an immaterial liability as of June 30, 2013.

NOTE 13 – TREASURY STOCK

On September 17, 2001, the Company announced an open market stock repurchase program to purchase up to one million shares of outstanding Company common stock, subject to market conditions and other factors. Any purchases under the Company’s stock repurchase program may be made from time to time without prior notice. On July 26, 2006, the Company announced that it had expanded the existing open market stock repurchase program to enable the Company to purchase up to an additional three million shares of the Company’s outstanding common stock, bringing the total number of shares authorized for repurchase to four million shares. Through June 30, 2013, the Company had repurchased a total of 3,006,293 shares of common stock through the open market stock repurchase program. The Company repurchased 250,000 shares for $5.9 million under the program during the three months ended June 30, 2013.

In connection with the vesting and release of the restriction on previously vested shares of restricted stock units, the Company repurchased 65,516 shares for $1.6 million related to minimum statutory tax withholding requirements on these restricted stock units during the three months ended June 30, 2013. These repurchase transactions do not fall under the repurchase program described above, and therefore do not reduce the amount that is available for repurchase under that program.

 

19


Table of Contents

NOTE 14 – NET INCOME PER SHARE

Calculations of the basic and diluted net income per share and potential common shares are as follows (in thousands, except for per share data):

 

     Three Months Ended
June 30,
 
     2013      2012  

Numerator:

     

Net income

   $ 5,253       $ 5,008   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Denominator:

     

Denominator for basic net income (loss) per share – weighted average shares outstanding

     41,405         41,742   

Dilutive common equivalent shares:

     

Weighted average stock options

     85         135   

Weighted average restricted stock units

     578         576   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Denominator for diluted net income (loss) per share – weighted average shares outstanding

     42,068         42,453   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net income (loss) per share:

     

Basic net income per share

   $ 0.13       $ 0.12   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Diluted net income per share

   $ 0.12       $ 0.12   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

The following table sets forth restricted stock units excluded from the calculation of diluted net income per share, since their inclusion would be antidilutive (in thousands)

 

     Three Months Ended
June 30,
 
     2013      2012  

Restricted stock units

     560         71   

Basic EPS is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. Unvested restricted shares, although legally issued and outstanding, are not considered outstanding for purposes of calculating basic earnings per share. Diluted EPS is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares outstanding plus the dilutive effect, if any, of outstanding stock options, restricted shares and restricted stock units using the treasury stock method. The calculation of the dilutive effect of outstanding equity awards under the treasury stock method includes consideration of proceeds from the assumed exercise of stock options, unrecognized compensation expense and any tax benefits as additional proceeds.

NOTE 15 – INCOME TAXES

Our effective income tax rates were 40.4% and 36.3% for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and March 31, 2013, respectively. Generally, the effective tax rates differ from statutory rates due to the impact of the domestic production activities deduction, the impact of state taxes, and federal, foreign and state tax credits. The effective tax rate for the three months ended June 30, 2013 is higher than the effective rate for our fiscal year ended March 31, 2013 primarily due to the interim accounting treatment of certain foreign losses for which no benefit can be recognized.

Our effective tax rates were 40.4% and 36.3% for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. At this time, the effective tax rate is higher than the comparable year primarily due to the interim accounting treatment of certain foreign losses for which no benefit can be recognized, offset by the impact of the reinstatement of the research and development credit.

 

20


Table of Contents

NOTE 16 – SEGMENT AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION

The Company reports revenues and income under one reportable segment. The consolidated financial information is used by the chief operating decision maker, or decision making group, in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance.

The Company manages its business in the following geographic areas: United States, Europe, Asia and the rest of the world. In accordance with United States export control regulations, the Company does not sell or do business with countries subject to economic sanctions and export controls.

Total revenue by geography is as follows (in thousands):

 

     Three Months Ended
June 30,
 
     2013      2012  

United States

   $ 62,772       $ 55,095   

Europe

     8,939         10,432   

Asia

     3,903         4,271   

Rest of the world

     6,191         6,563   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 
   $ 81,805       $ 76,361   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

The United States revenue includes sales to resellers in the United States. These resellers fulfill customer orders and may subsequently ship the Company’s products to international locations. The Company reports these shipments as United States revenue since the Company ships the products to a United States location. A majority of revenue attributable to locations outside of the United States is a result of export sales. Substantially all of the Company’s identifiable assets are located in the United States.

 

21


Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

In addition to historical information, the following discussion and other parts of this Quarterly Report contain forward-looking statements under Section 21E of the Exchange Act and other federal securities laws. These forward looking statements involve risks and uncertainties. These statements relate to future events or our future financial performance and are identified by terminology such as “may,” “will,” “could,” “should,” “expects,” “plans,” “intends,” “seeks,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “potential” or “continue,” or the negative of such terms or other comparable terminology. These statements are only predictions. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Actual events or results may differ materially due to competitive factors and other factors referred to in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year ended March 31, 2013 and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report. These factors may cause our actual results to differ materially from any forward-looking statement.

Overview

NetScout was founded in 1984 and is headquartered in Westford, Massachusetts. We design, develop, manufacture, market, sell and support market leading unified service delivery management, service assurance and application performance management solutions focused on assuring service delivery for the world’s largest, most demanding and complex IP based service delivery environments. We manufacture and market these products in integrated hardware and software solutions that are used by commercial enterprises, large governmental agencies and telecommunication service providers worldwide. We have a single operating segment and substantially all of our identifiable assets are located in the United States.

Our operating results are influenced by a number of factors, including, but not limited to, the mix and quantity of products and services sold, pricing, costs of materials used in our products, growth in employee related costs, including commissions, and the expansion of our operations. Factors that affect our ability to maximize our operating results include, but are not limited to, our ability to introduce and enhance existing products, the marketplace acceptance of those new or enhanced products, continued expansion into international markets, development of strategic partnerships, competition, successful acquisition integration efforts, our ability to achieve significant expense reductions and make structural improvements and current economic conditions.

Our key objectives have been to continue to gain market share in the wireless service provider market and to accelerate our enterprise growth by extending into the application performance management segment. A common component of both initiatives has been the acceptance of our Unified Services Delivery Management Strategy. This strategy has been bolstered by our acquisitions and integration of both voice/video and packet flow or monitoring switch technology.

During the quarter ended June 30, 2013, NetScout announced the release of the nGeniusONE Unified Performance Management platform. The nGeniusONE platform converges application and network performance management functionality into a single unified platform that delivers a top-down, serviced-focused perspective of performance characteristics of all infrastructure and application elements associated with service delivery.

During the first quarter of our fiscal year 2014, management performed a review of its summation of revenue by industry. As a result, we changed our method of apportioning revenue to our revenue sectors, and the categorization of certain customers to different sectors. This change in manner of describing fluctuations by sector will not affect our total net revenues, total product and service revenues, or revenue by geography.

Results Overview

During the quarter ended June 30, 2013, net income increased 5% compared to the same period in the prior year due to the increase in revenue.

We saw continued growth during the quarter ended June 30, 2013, with product revenue growth of 7% and overall revenue growth of 7% compared to the same period in the prior year.

 

22


Table of Contents

Our business maintained strong gross profit margins. Our gross margin for the quarter ended June 30, 2013 increased one point to 79%, up from 78% in the same period in the prior year.

We continue to maintain strong liquidity. At June 30, 2013, we had cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities of $162.8 million. This represents an increase of $8.7 million from March 31, 2013.

Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures

We supplement the generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) financial measures we report in quarterly earnings announcements, investor presentations and other investor communications by reporting the following non-GAAP measures: non-GAAP revenue, non-GAAP net income and non-GAAP net income per diluted share. Non-GAAP revenue eliminates the GAAP effects of acquisitions by adding back revenue related to deferred revenue revaluation. Non-GAAP net income includes the foregoing adjustment and also removes expenses related to the amortization of acquired intangible assets, share-based compensation, restructuring, certain expenses relating to acquisitions including compensation for post-combination services and business development charges, net of related income tax effects. Non-GAAP diluted net income per share also excludes these expenses as well as the related impact of all these adjustments on the provision for income taxes.

These non-GAAP measures are not in accordance with GAAP, should not be considered an alternative for measures prepared in accordance with GAAP (revenue, net income and diluted net income per share), and may have limitations in that they do not reflect all our results of operations as determined in accordance with GAAP. These non-GAAP measures should only be used to evaluate our results of operations in conjunction with the corresponding GAAP measures. The presentation of non-GAAP information is not meant to be considered superior to, in isolation from or as a substitute for results prepared in accordance with GAAP.

Management believes these non-GAAP financial measures enhance the reader’s overall understanding of our current financial performance and its prospects for the future by providing a higher degree of transparency for certain financial measures and providing a level of disclosure that helps investors understand how we plan and measure our business. We believe that providing these non-GAAP measures affords investors a view of our operating results that may be more easily compared to our peer companies and also enables investors to consider our operating results on both a GAAP and non-GAAP basis during and following the integration period of our acquisitions. Presenting the GAAP measures on their own may not be indicative of our core operating results. Furthermore, management believes that the presentation of non-GAAP measures when shown in conjunction with the corresponding GAAP measures provide useful information to management and investors regarding present and future business trends relating to our financial condition and results of operations.

 

23


Table of Contents

The following table reconciles revenue, net income and net income per share on a GAAP and non-GAAP basis for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 (in thousands):

 

     Three Months Ended
June 30,
 
     2013     2012  

GAAP revenue

   $ 81,805      $ 76,361   

Deferred revenue fair value adjustment

     140        138   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Non-GAAP revenue

   $ 81,945      $ 76,499   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

GAAP net income

   $ 5,253      $ 5,008   

Deferred revenue fair value adjustment

     140        138   

Share-based compensation expense

     2,812        2,247   

Amortization of acquired intangible assets

     1,673        2,003   

Business development and integration expense

     170        357   

Compensation for post combination services

     444        372   

Restructuring charges

     —          (87

Income tax adjustments

     (1,785     (1,911
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Non-GAAP net income

   $ 8,707      $ 8,127   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

GAAP diluted net income per share

   $ 0.12      $ 0.12   

Share impact of non-GAAP adjustments identified above

     0.09        0.07   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Non-GAAP diluted net income per share

   $ 0.21      $ 0.19   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Critical Accounting Policies

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America consistently applied. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires us to make significant estimates and judgments that affect the amounts reported in our consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes. These items are regularly monitored and analyzed by management for changes in facts and circumstances, and material changes in these estimates could occur in the future. Changes in estimates are recorded in the period in which they become known. We base our estimates on historical experience and various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from our estimates.

While all of our accounting policies impact the consolidated financial statements, certain policies are viewed to be critical. Critical accounting policies are those that are both most important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations and that require management’s most subjective or complex judgments and estimates. We consider the following accounting policies to be critical in fully understanding and evaluating our financial results:

 

   

marketable securities;

 

   

revenue recognition;

 

   

valuation of goodwill, intangible assets and other acquisition accounting items; and

 

   

share-based compensation.

Please refer to the critical accounting policies set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on May 24, 2013, for a description of all of our critical accounting policies.

 

24


Table of Contents

Three Months Ended June 30, 2013 and 2012

Revenue

Product revenue consists of sales of our hardware products and licensing of our software products. Service revenue consists of customer support agreements, consulting and training. One direct customer accounted for more than 10% of our total revenue during the three months ended June 30, 2013. No one customer or indirect channel partner accounted for more than 10% of our total revenue during the three months ended June 30, 2012.

 

     Three Months Ended
June 30,
(Dollars in Thousands)
    Change  
     2013     2012    
            % of
Revenue
           % of
Revenue
    $      %  

Revenue:

               

Product

   $ 42,977         53   $ 40,262         53   $ 2,715         7

Service

     38,828         47        36,099         47        2,729         8
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

Total revenue

   $ 81,805         100   $ 76,361         100   $ 5,444         7
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

Product. The 7%, or $2.7 million, increase in product revenue was due to a $3.2 million increase in revenue from our service provider sector and a $1.7 million increase in our general enterprise sector. These increases were offset by a $2.2 million decrease in our government enterprise sector. Compared to the same period in the prior year, we realized a 25% increase in the average selling price per unit of our products, offset by a 17% decrease in units shipped. The increase in average selling price is due to product mix.

We expect continued growth in our fiscal year ended March 31, 2014 and expect our service provider sector to continue to be a significant driver of future growth.

Service. The 8%, or $2.7 million, increase in service revenue was due to a $1.9 million increase in revenue from maintenance contracts due to increased new maintenance contracts and renewals from a growing support base, a $754 thousand increase in premium support contracts and a $233 thousand increase in training revenue. These were offset by a $208 thousand decrease in consulting revenue. We expect single digit percentage growth in our service revenues. We expect this to be generated by product revenue growth which increases our installed base and therefore our related maintenance contracts.

Total product and service revenue from direct and indirect channels are as follows:

 

     Three Months Ended
June 30,
(Dollars in Thousands)
    Change  
     2013     2012    
            % of
Revenue
           % of
Revenue
    $      %  

Indirect

   $ 39,531         48   $ 38,031         50   $ 1,500         4

Direct

     42,274         52        38,330         50        3,944         10
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

Total revenue

   $ 81,805         100   $ 76,361         100   $ 5,444         7
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

The 4%, or $1.5 million, increase in indirect channel revenue is the result of the increase in international sales to our service provider sector. Sales to customers outside the United States are export sales typically through channel partners, who are generally responsible for distributing our products and providing technical support and service to customers within their territories. Our reported international revenue does not include any revenue from sales to customers outside the United States that are shipped to our United States-based indirect channel partners. These domestic resellers fulfill customer orders based upon joint selling efforts in conjunction

 

25


Table of Contents

with our direct sales force and may subsequently ship our products to international locations; however, we report these shipments as United States revenue since we ship the products to a domestic location. The 10%, or $3.9 million, increase in direct channel revenue is the result of increased domestic revenue from our service provider and general enterprise sectors.

Total revenue by geography is as follows:

 

     Three Months Ended
June 30,
(Dollars in Thousands)
    Change  
     2013     2012    
            % of
Revenue
           % of
Revenue
    $     %  

United States

   $ 62,772         77   $ 55,095         72   $ 7,677        14
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

International:

              

Europe

     8,939         11        10,432         14        (1,493     (14 %) 

Asia

     3,903         5        4,271         6        (368     (9 %) 

Rest of the world

     6,191         7        6,563         8        (372     (6 %) 
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

Subtotal international

     19,033         23        21,266         28        (2,233     (11 %) 
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

Total revenue

   $ 81,805         100   $ 76,361         100   $ 5,444        7
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

United States revenues increased 19%, or $7.7 million, as a result of an increase in our service provider and general enterprise sectors. The 11%, or $2.2 million, decrease in international revenue is primarily due to a decrease in our government and general enterprise sectors. We expect revenue from sales to customers outside the United States to continue to account for a significant portion of our total revenue in the future. In accordance with United States export control regulations we do not sell to, or do business with, countries subject to economic sanctions and export controls.

Cost of Revenue and Gross Profit

Cost of product revenue consists primarily of material components, manufacturing personnel expenses, manuals, packaging materials, overhead and amortization of capitalized software, acquired software and core technology. Cost of service revenue consists primarily of personnel, material, overhead and support costs.

 

     Three Months Ended
June 30,
(Dollars in Thousands)
    Change  
     2013     2012    
           % of
Revenue
          % of
Revenue
    $     %  

Cost of revenue:

            

Product

   $ 9,773        12   $ 10,070        13   $ (297     (3 %) 

Service

     7,149        9        6,793        9        356        5
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Total cost of revenue

   $ 16,922        21     16,863        22     59        0
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Gross profit:

            

Product $

   $ 33,204        41   $ 30,192        40     3,012        10

Product gross profit %

     77       75       2  

Service $

     31,679        39     29,306        38     2,373        8

Service gross profit %

     82       81       1  
  

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

   

Total gross profit $

   $ 64,883        $ 59,498        $ 5,385        9
  

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

   

Total gross profit %

     79       78       1  
  

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

   

 

26


Table of Contents

Product. The 3%, or $297 thousand, decrease in cost of product revenue was due in part to a $597 thousand decrease in amortization of software and core technology included as cost of product revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2013. In addition, there was a $335 thousand decrease in obsolescence due to no repeat of write-offs for end of life products. These decreases were offset by an increase in direct product costs as a result of the 7%, or $2.7 million increase in product revenue. The product gross profit percentage increased by two points to 77% during the three months ended June 30, 2013. Average headcount in manufacturing was 32 and 27 for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Service. The 5%, or $356 thousand, increase in cost of service revenue was due to a $674 thousand increase in employee related expenses resulting in part from increased headcount to support our growing installed base, as well as from increased share- based compensation. This was offset by a $189 thousand decrease in consulting expenses. The 8%, or $2.4 million, increase in service gross profit corresponds with the 8%, or $2.7 million, increase in service revenue, offset by the 5%, or $356 thousand, increase in cost of service revenue. The service gross profit percentage increased by one point to 82% for the three months ended June 30, 2013. Average service headcount was 142 and 125 for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Gross profit. Our gross profit increased 9%, or $5.4 million. This increase is attributable to our increase in revenue of 7%, or $5.4 million, offset by a 0%, or $59 thousand, increase in cost of revenue. The gross margin percentage increased by one point to 79% for the three months ended June 30, 2013 when compared to the three months ended June 30, 2012. Overall we expect our gross margin percentage to remain relatively flat in future periods with increased sales volumes offset by corresponding increases in product and service costs.

Operating Expenses

 

     Three Months Ended
June 30,
(Dollars in Thousands)
    Change  
     2013     2012    
            % of
Revenue
          % of
Revenue
    $      %  

Research and development

   $ 15,965         19   $ 14,077        18   $ 1,888         13

Sales and marketing

     32,200         39        30,149        39        2,051         7

General and administrative

     6,981         9        6,557        9        424         6

Amortization of acquired intangible assets

     854         1        586        1        268         46

Restructuring charges

     0         0        (87     0        87         100
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

Total operating expenses

   $ 56,000         68   $ 51,282        67   $ 4,718         9
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

Research and development. Research and development expenses consist primarily of personnel expenses, fees for outside consultants, overhead and related expenses associated with the development of new products and the enhancement of existing products.

The 13%, or $1.9 million, increase in research and development expenses is due to a $1.1 million increase in employee related expenses, as a result of increased headcount and increased share-based compensation, a $207 thousand increase in non-recurring engineering expenses, a $187 thousand increase in depreciation expense, a $183 thousand increase related to third party research and development charges, a $164 thousand increase in travel expenses and a $125 thousand increase in consulting costs. These expenses are offset by a $236 thousand decrease in compensation for post combination services related to the acquisitions of Simena, LLC (Simena) and ONPATH Technologies, Inc. (ONPATH). Average headcount in research and development was 357 and 300 for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. We expect research and development expenses to stay fairly consistent as a percentage of sales in future periods.

 

27


Table of Contents

Sales and marketing. Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of personnel expenses, including commissions, overhead and other expenses associated with selling activities and marketing programs such as trade shows, seminars, advertising, and new product launch activities.

The 7%, or $2.1 million, increase in total sales and marketing expenses was due to an $824 thousand increase in employee related expenses due to an increase in headcount, a $638 thousand increase in expenses related to the NetScout user conference, a $585 thousand increase in depreciation, a $288 thousand increase in marketing related costs, a $268 thousand increase in travel expenses and a $205 thousand increase in trade show expenses. These increases were offset by a $1.0 million decrease in commissions due to both a lower commission rate as well as a decrease in special incentive programs offered during the three months ended June 30, 2013 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2012. Average headcount in sales and marketing was 345 and 328 for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

General and administrative. General and administrative expenses consist primarily of personnel expenses for executive, financial, legal and human resource employees, overhead and other corporate expenditures.

The 6%, or $424 thousand, increase in general and administrative expenses was due to a $284 thousand increase in compensation for post combination services related to the acquisition of ONPATH, a$158 thousand increase in expenses for software licenses, an $87 thousand increase in accounting related fees, an $81 thousand increase due to software capitalized during the three months ended June 30, 2012, and a $60 thousand increase in travel expenses. These increases were offset by a $368 thousand decrease in employee related expenses related to decreased incentive compensation offset by an increase in headcount and increased share-based compensation. Average headcount in general and administrative was 120 and 110 for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Amortization of acquired intangible assets. Amortization of acquired intangible assets consists primarily of amortization of customer relationships related to the acquisitions of ONPATH, Accanto Systems, S.r.l. (Accanto), Simena, Fox Replay BV (Replay), Psytechnics, Ltd (Psytechnics) and Network General Central Corporation (Network General).

The 46%, or $268 thousand, increase in amortization of acquired intangible assets is due to the increase of expense recorded related to the acquisitions of ONPATH and Accanto.

Restructuring charges. During the quarter ended June 30, 2012, we reversed $87 thousand of restructuring charges from what was initially recorded during the year ended March 31, 2012 due to a change in estimate and the impacts of foreign exchange.

Interest and Other (Expense) Income, Net

Interest and other (expense) income, net includes interest earned on our cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities, interest expense and other non-operating gains or losses.

 

     Three Months Ended
June 30,
(Dollars in Thousands)
    Change  
     2013     2012    
           % of
Revenue
          % of
Revenue
    $      %  

Interest and other (expense) income, net

   $ (73     (0 %)    $ (356     (0 %)    $ 283         79

The 79%, or $283 thousand, decrease in interest and other (expense) income, net was due to a $200 thousand decrease in interest expense due to the payment of our outstanding debt during the quarter ended December 31, 2012, as well as a $111 thousand decrease in foreign currency exchange expense. These decreases to interest and other (expense) income, net were partially offset by a $29 thousand decrease in interest income received on investments.

 

28


Table of Contents

Income Tax Expense

Our effective income tax rates were 40.4% and 36.3% for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Generally, the effective tax rates differ from statutory rates due to the impact of the domestic production activities deduction, the impact of state taxes, and federal, foreign and state tax credits. At this time, the effective tax rate for the three months ended June 30, 2013 is higher than the comparable prior year period primarily due to the interim accounting treatment of certain foreign losses for which no benefit can be recognized, offset by the impact of the reinstatement of the research and development credit.

 

     Three Months Ended
June 30,
(Dollars in Thousands)
    Change  
     2013     2012    
            % of
Revenue
           % of
Revenue
    $      %  

Income tax expense

   $ 3,557         4   $ 2,852         4   $ 705         25

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of June 30, 2013 and 2012, we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements as defined in Regulation S-K, Item 303(a)(4)(ii).

Commitment and Contingencies

We account for claims and contingencies in accordance with authoritative guidance that requires us to record an estimated loss from a claim or loss contingency when information available prior to issuance of our consolidated financial statements indicates that it is probable that a liability has been incurred at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. If we determine that it is reasonably possible but not probable that an asset has been impaired or a liability has been incurred or if the amount of a probable loss cannot be reasonably estimated, then in accordance with the authoritative guidance, we disclose the amount or range of estimated loss if the amount or range of estimated loss is material. Accounting for claims and contingencies requires us to use our judgment. We consult with legal counsel on those issues related to litigation and seek input from other experts and advisors with respect to matters in the ordinary course of business. For additional information with respect to legal proceedings, refer to Part II, Item 1 “Legal Proceedings.”

We recorded two contingent liabilities related to the acquisition of Simena. One relates to future consideration to be paid to the former owner which had an initial fair value of $8.0 million at the time of acquisition and another relates to contractual non-compliance liabilities incurred by Simena with an initial fair value of $1.6 million at the time of acquisition. At June 30, 2013, the present value of the future consideration was $4.1 million and the contractual non-compliance liability was $197 thousand.

As disclosed in Part II, Item 1, in March 2012, we uncovered and investigated, and in April 2012, disclosed to the U.S. Department of Justice and the California State Attorney General potential violations of federal and California state anti-trust laws. The potential violations involve a former employee and one or more third parties in connection with sales to state governmental agencies during fiscal year 2012. We believe we did not benefit from any of the transactions uncovered and believe that the amounts involved are not material. The California State Attorney General is conducting an investigation into the matter. We are cooperating fully and are providing all requested information. In general, the federal and state agencies have the authority to seek fines and other remedies for anti-trust violations; however, no charges or proceedings have been initiated by any governmental agency against NetScout, and we have been informed by the Department of Justice that it does not intend to take any action against NetScout. We determined that it is probable that there will be amounts due, those amounts are reasonably estimable and have been accrued as an immaterial liability as of June 30, 2013.

 

29


Table of Contents

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities consist of the following (in thousands):

 

     June 30,
2013
     March 31,
2013
 

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 102,727       $ 99,930   

Short-term marketable securities

     46,333         37,338   

Long-term marketable securities

     13,762         16,823   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities

   $ 162,822       $ 154,091   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities

At June 30, 2013, cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities totaled $162.8 million, up $8.7 million from $154.1 million at March 31, 2013 due primarily to cash flow from operations of $18.6 million, offset by $7.5 million of cash used to repurchase shares of our common stock and $2.4 million of cash used for capital expenditures.

Substantially all of our cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities are located in the United States. At June 30, 2013, cash and short-term and long-term investments in the United States was $160.2 million, while cash held outside the United States was approximately $2.6 million.

Cash and cash equivalents were impacted by the following:

 

     Three Months Ended June 30,
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
           2013                 2012        

Net cash provided by operating activities

   $ 18,613      $ 36,124   

Net cash used in investing activities

   $ (8,395   $ (10,510

Net cash used in financing activities

   $ (7,371   $ (7,861

Net cash provided by operating activities

Cash provided by operating activities was $18.6 million during the three months ended June 30, 2013, compared to $36.1 million of cash provided by operating activities in the three months ended June 30, 2012. This $17.5 million decrease was due to accounts receivables, which had a $7.9 million unfavorable impact in the three months ended June 30, 2013 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2012. Cash collections on accounts receivable was strong with days sales outstanding of 55 days as of the end of the first quarter of fiscal year 2014 compared to 68 days at March 31, 2013 and 45 days at the end of the first quarter of fiscal year 2013. In addition, there was a $7.3 million decrease from accrued compensation and other expenses largely due to the timing of accruals and payments for incentive compensation as a result of an increase in the payout for fiscal year 2013 incentive compensation during the three months ended June 30, 2013 as compared to the payout for the fiscal year 2012 bonus during three months ended June 30, 2012, as well as accrued commissions. Additionally, there was a $5.1 million decrease in cash flows from inventories related to an increase in the inventory balance as of June 30, 2013, and a $1.8 million decrease from deferred income taxes. These were offset by a $2.2 million increase from deferred revenue and a $1.1 million increase from accounts payable due to timing of payments.

 

30


Table of Contents

Net cash used in investing activities

 

     Three Months Ended June 30,
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
           2013                 2012        

Cash used in investing activities included the following:

    

Purchase of marketable securities

   $ (18,081   $ (58,671

Proceeds from maturity of marketable securities

     12,112        50,882   

Purchase of fixed assets

     (2,380     (2,721

Increase in deposits

     (46     0   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   $ (8,395   $ (10,510
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash used in investing activities was down $2.1 million to $8.4 million during the three months ended June 30, 2013, compared to $10.5 million of cash used in investing activities in the three months ended June 30, 2012.

Our investments in property and equipment consist primarily of computer equipment, demonstration units, office equipment and facility improvements. We plan to continue to invest in capital expenditures to support our infrastructure in our fiscal year 2014.

Net outflow relating the purchase and sales of marketable securities was down $1.8 million during the three months ended June 30, 2013 when compared to the three months ended June 30, 2012 relating to the impact of investment mix.

Net cash used in financing activities

 

     Three Months Ended June 30,
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
         2013             2012      

Cash used in financing activities included the following:

    

Issuance of common stock under stock plans

   $ 213      $ 14   

Payment of contingent consideration

     (841     (1,516

Treasury stock repurchases

     (7,470     (6,413

Excess tax benefit from share-based compensation awards

     727        54   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   $ (7,371   $ (7,861
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash used in financing activities was down $490 thousand to $7.4 million during the three months ended June 30, 2013, compared to $7.9 million of cash used in financing activities in the three months ended June 30, 2012.

During the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, we paid $841 thousand and $1.5 million, respectively, related to the contingent purchase consideration for the acquisition of Simena. For additional information with respect to the contingent purchase consideration, see Note 12 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of this Form 10-Q.

Our Board of Directors has periodically authorized us to repurchase shares of our common stock. We are currently authorized to repurchase up to four million shares with cash from operations. During the three months ended June 20, 2013 and 2012, we repurchased 250,000 and 249,499 shares at a cost of $5.9 million and $4.9 million, respectively, under this program. Future repurchases of shares will reduce our cash balances. In addition, during the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, we had 65,516 and 70,904 shares transferred to us from employees for tax withholding at a cost of $1.6 million and $1.5 million, respectively.

 

31


Table of Contents

We generated $727 thousand and $54 thousand during the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, of the excess tax benefits from share-based compensation awards.

Credit Facility

On November 22, 2011, we entered into a new credit facility with a syndicate of lenders led by KeyBank National Association (KeyBank) which provides us with a $250 million revolving credit facility, which may be increased to $300 million at any time up to 90 days before maturity. The revolving credit facility includes a swing line loan sub-facility of up to $10 million and a letter of credit sub-facility of up to $10 million. The credit facility matures on November 21, 2016. At June 30, 2013, there were no amounts outstanding under the credit facility.

Expectations for Fiscal Year 2014

We believe that our cash balances, short-term marketable securities classified as available-for-sale and future cash flows generated by operations will be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash needs for working capital and capital expenditures for at least the next 12 months. In addition, we expect that cash provided by operating activities for our fiscal year 2014 will be in line with cash provided in our fiscal year 2013.Capital expenditures in our fiscal year 2014 are currently anticipated to be in line with previous years’ trend.

Additionally, a portion of our cash may be used to acquire or invest in complementary businesses or products or to obtain the right to use complementary technologies. From time to time, in the ordinary course of business, we evaluate potential acquisitions of such businesses, products or technologies such as our acquisitions of Psytechnics on April 1, 2011, Replay on October 3, 2011, Simena on November 18, 2011, certain assets, technology and employees of Accanto on July 20, 2012 and ONPATH on October 31, 2012. If our existing sources of liquidity are insufficient to satisfy our liquidity requirements, we may seek to sell additional equity or debt securities. The sale of additional equity or debt securities could result in additional dilution to our stockholders.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In July 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2013-11, Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists (ASU 2013-11). ASU 2013-11 clarifies guidance and eliminates diversity in practice on the presentation of unrecognized tax benefits when a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward exists at the reporting date. This new guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2013 and subsequent interim periods. NetScout is currently assessing the impact, if any, on its condensed consolidated financial statements.

In March 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2013-05 Foreign Currency Matters (Topic 830): Parent’s Accounting for the Cumulative Translation Adjustment upon Derecognition of Certain Subsidiaries or Groups of Assets within a Foreign Entity or of an Investment in a Foreign Entity (ASU 2013-05). ASU 2013-05 provides guidance on releasing cumulative translation adjustments when a reporting entity (parent) ceases to have a controlling financial interest in a subsidiary or a business within a foreign entity. ASU 2013-05 is effective on a prospective basis for fiscal years and interim reporting periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013 (the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2014 for NetScout). Early adoption is permitted. This standard is not expected to have a material impact on NetScout’s financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

In February 2013, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2013-02: Other Comprehensive Income (ASU 2013-02). ASU 2013-02 provides additional guidance regarding reclassifications out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (AOCI). The new guidance requires entities to report the effect of significant

 

32


Table of Contents

reclassifications out of AOCI on the respective line items in net income unless the amounts are not reclassified in their entirety to net income. For amounts that are not required to be reclassified in their entirety to net income in the same reporting period, entities are required to cross-reference other disclosures that provide additional detail about those amounts. The new guidance is effective prospectively for all interim and annual periods beginning April 1, 2013 with early adoption permitted. On April 1, 2013, NetScout adopted ASU 2013-02. While the new guidance in ASU 2013-02 changes the presentation of AOCI, there are no changes to the components that are recognized in net income or AOCI under current accounting guidance.

In January 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-01, Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities (ASU 2013-01). ASU 2013-01 contains no amendments to disclosure requirements. The amendments clarify that the scope of ASU 2011-11, Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities, which introduced new disclosure requirements, applies to derivatives accounted for in accordance with Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, including bifurcated embedded derivatives, repurchase agreements and reverse repurchase agreements, and securities borrowing and securities lending transactions that are either offset in accordance with Section 210-20-45 or Section 815-10-45 or subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement or similar agreement. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements as these updates have an impact on presentation only.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Credit Risk. Our cash equivalents and marketable securities consist primarily of money market instruments, U.S. Treasury bills, certificates of deposit, commercial paper, corporate bonds and municipal obligations.

At June 30, 2013 and periodically throughout the year, we have maintained cash balances in various operating accounts in excess of federally insured limits. We limit the amount of credit exposure with any one financial institution by evaluating the creditworthiness of the financial institutions with which we invest.

Foreign Currency Exchange Risk. As a result of our foreign operations, we face exposure to movements in foreign currency exchange rates, primarily the Euro, British Pound, Canadian Dollar and Indian Rupee. The current exposures arise primarily from expenses denominated in foreign currencies. NetScout currently engages in foreign currency hedging activities in order to limit these exposures. We do not use derivative financial instruments for speculative trading purposes.

As of June 30, 2013, we had foreign currency forward contracts with notional amounts totaling $10.3 million. The valuation of outstanding foreign currency forward contracts at June 30, 2013 resulted in a liability balance of $303 thousand, reflecting unfavorable contract rates in comparison to current market rates at this date and an asset balance of $40 thousand reflecting favorable rates in comparison to current market rates. As of March 31, 2013, we had foreign currency forward contracts with notional amounts totaling $17.1 million. The valuation of outstanding foreign currency forward contracts at March 31, 2013 resulted in a liability balance of $249 thousand, reflecting unfavorable contract rates in comparison to current market rates at this date and an asset balance of $71 thousand reflecting favorable rates in comparison to current market rates.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

As of June 30, 2013, NetScout, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act). Based upon that evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that, as of June 30, 2013, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective in ensuring that material information relating to NetScout, including its consolidated subsidiaries, required to be disclosed by NetScout in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms,

 

33


Table of Contents

including ensuring that such material information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

There were no changes in our internal controls that occurred during our last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

34


Table of Contents

PART II: OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.Legal Proceedings

From time to time, NetScout is subject to legal proceedings and claims in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, the amount of ultimate expense with respect to any current legal proceedings and claims, if determined adversely, will not have a significant adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

In March 2012, NetScout uncovered and investigated, and in April 2012, disclosed to the U.S. Department of Justice and the California State Attorney General potential violations of federal and California state anti-trust laws. The potential violations involve a former employee and one or more third parties in connection with sales to state governmental agencies during fiscal year 2012. NetScout believes it did not benefit from any of the transactions uncovered and that the amounts involved are not believed to be material. The California State Attorney General is conducting an investigation into the matter. NetScout is cooperating fully and is providing all requested information. In general, the federal and state agencies have the authority to seek fines and other remedies for anti-trust violations; however, no charges or proceedings have been initiated by any governmental agency against NetScout and we have been informed by the Department of Justice that it does not intend to take any action against NetScout.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year ended March 31, 2013. The risks discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K could materially affect our business, financial condition and future results. There have been no material changes to those risk factors since we filed our Annual Report on Form 10-K. The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks facing us. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition or operating results.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

The following table provides information about purchases we made during the quarter ended June 30, 2013 of equity securities that are registered by us pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act:

 

     Total Number
of Shares
Purchased(1)
     Average Price
Paid per Share
     Total Number of
Shares Purchased
as Part of Publicly
Announced Plans
or Programs
     Maximum Number
of Shares That May
Yet be Purchased
Under the Plans or
Programs
 

4/1/2013 thru 4/30/2013

     16,063      $ 23.35        8,000        1,235,707  

5/1/2013 thru 5/31/2013

     201,762        23.27        201,459        1,034,248  

6/1/2013 thru 6/30/2013

     97,691        24.20        40,541        993,707  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

     315,516      $ 23.56        250,000        993,707   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

(1) We purchased an aggregate of 65,516 shares transferred to us from employees in satisfaction of minimum tax withholding obligations associated with the vesting of restricted stock units during the period. These purchases reflected in the table do not reduce the maximum number of shares that may be purchased under the plan.

 

35


Table of Contents

Item 6. Exhibits

 

(a) Exhibits

 

  31.1   +    Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
  31.2   +    Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
  32.1   ++    Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
  32.2   ++    Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101.INS   **    XBRL Instance Document.
101.SCH   **    XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
101.CAL   **    XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase document.
101.DEF   **    XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase document.
101.LAB   **    XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase document.
101.PRE   **    XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase document.

 

+ Filed herewith.
++ Furnished herewith.
** XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language) information is furnished and not filed or a part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is deemed not filed for purposes of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.

 

36


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

  NETSCOUT SYSTEMS, INC.
Date: August 2, 2013  

/s/ Anil K. Singhal

  Anil K. Singhal
 

President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman

        (Principal Executive Officer)

 

Date: August 2, 2013

 

/s/ Jean Bua

  Jean Bua
  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 

        (Principal Financial Officer)

        (Principal Accounting Officer)

 

37


Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX

 

Exhibit No.

 

  

 

Description

  31.1   +   Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
  31.2   +   Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
  32.1   ++   Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
  32.2   ++   Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101.INS   **   XBRL Instance Document.
101.SCH   **   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
101.CAL   **   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase document.
101.DEF   **   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase document.
101.LAB   **   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase document.
101.PRE   **   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase document.

 

+ Filed herewith.
++ Furnished herewith.
** XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language) information is furnished and not filed or a part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is deemed not filed for purposes of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.

 

38