Table of Contents

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D. C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

 

þ	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2014

OR

 

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                      to                     

Commission file number 1-8661

THE CHUBB CORPORATION

 

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

NEW JERSEY		13-2595722
(State or other jurisdiction of		(I. R. S. Employer
incorporation or organization)		Identification No.)
15 MOUNTAIN VIEW ROAD, WARREN, NEW JERSEY		07059
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (908) 903-2000

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

 

YES  þ		NO  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

 

YES  þ		NO  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

Large accelerated filer  þ		Accelerated filer  ¨		Non-accelerated filer  ¨		Smaller reporting company  ¨
				(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

 

YES  ¨		NO  þ

The number of shares of common stock outstanding as of June 30, 2014 was 240,483,744.

 

 

 

 

---

Table of Contents

THE CHUBB CORPORATION

INDEX

 

		Page Number
Part I. Financial Information:
Item 1 — Financial Statements:
Consolidated Statements of Income for the Three Months and Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 and 2013			1
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Three Months and Six Months Ended June  30, 2014 and 2013			2
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013			3
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 and 2013			4
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 and 2013			5
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements			6
Item 2 — Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations			19
Item 3 — Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk			52
Item 4 — Controls and Procedures			52
Part II. Other Information:
Item 1A — Risk Factors			53
Item 2 — Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds			53
Item 6 — Exhibits			54
Signatures			54
EX-10.2
EX-10.3
EX-31.1
EX-31.2
EX-32.1
EX-32.2
EX-101 INSTANCE DOCUMENT
EX-101 SCHEMA DOCUMENT
EX-101 CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 LABELS LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 DEFINITION LINKBASE DOCUMENT

---

Table of Contents

 

Page 1

Part I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1 — Financial Statements

THE CHUBB CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

PERIODS ENDED JUNE 30

(in millions)

 

		Second Quarter								Six Months
		2014				2013				2014				2013
Revenues
Premiums Earned		$	3,064			$	2,995			$	6,093			$	5,999
Investment Income			351				368				709				740
Other Revenues			2				9				5				12
Realized Investment Gains (Losses), Net
Total Other-Than-Temporary Impairment Losses on Investments			(5	)			(5	)			(5	)			(7	)
Other Realized Investment Gains, Net			130				184				246				324
Total Realized Investment Gains, Net			125				179				241				317
Total Revenues			3,542				3,551				7,048				7,068
Losses and Expenses
Losses and Loss Expenses			1,792				1,694				3,637				3,262
Amortization of Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs			630				617				1,252				1,204
Other Insurance Operating Costs and Expenses			366				358				722				717
Investment Expenses			9				13				20				26
Other Expenses			5				11				10				17
Corporate Expenses			62				62				126				130
Total Losses and Expenses			2,864				2,755				5,767				5,356
Income Before Federal and Foreign Income Tax			678				796				1,281				1,712
Federal and Foreign Income Tax			179				217				333				477
Net Income		$	499			$	579			$	948			$	1,235
Net Income Per Share
Basic		$	2.03			$	2.22			$	3.84			$	4.72
Diluted			2.03				2.21				3.83				4.69
Dividends Declared Per Share			.50				.44				1.00				.88

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

---

Table of Contents

 

Page 2

THE CHUBB CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

PERIODS ENDED JUNE 30

(in millions)

 

		Second Quarter								Six Months
		2014				2013				2014				2013
Net Income		$	499			$	579			$	948			$	1,235
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of Tax
Change in Unrealized Appreciation of Investments			238				(700	)			473				(696	)
Change in Postretirement Benefit Costs Not Yet Recognized in Net Income			5				14				11				31
Foreign Currency Translation Gains (Losses)			4				28				(15	)			(22	)
			247				(658	)			469				(687	)
Comprehensive Income (Loss)		$	746			$	(79	)		$	1,417			$	548

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

---

Table of Contents

 

Page 3

THE CHUBB CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in millions)

 

		June 30 2014				December 31 2013
Assets
Invested Assets
Short Term Investments		$	1,845			$	2,114
Fixed Maturities (cost $36,313 and $35,959)			38,062				37,091
Equity Securities (cost $1,106 and $1,057)			1,969				1,810
Other Invested Assets			1,595				1,598
TOTAL INVESTED ASSETS			43,471				42,613
Cash			55				52
Accrued Investment Income			417				418
Premiums Receivable			2,420				2,284
Reinsurance Recoverable on Unpaid Losses and Loss Expenses			1,729				1,802
Prepaid Reinsurance Premiums			278				290
Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs			1,286				1,255
Deferred Income Tax			—				47
Goodwill			467				467
Other Assets			1,317				1,205
TOTAL ASSETS		$	51,440			$	50,433
Liabilities
Unpaid Losses and Loss Expenses		$	23,127			$	23,146
Unearned Premiums			6,588				6,423
Long Term Debt			3,300				3,300
Dividend Payable to Shareholders			122				110
Deferred Income Tax			259				—
Accrued Expenses and Other Liabilities			1,546				1,357
TOTAL LIABILITIES			34,942				34,336
Shareholders’ Equity
Common Stock - $1 Par Value; 371,980,460 Shares			372				372
Paid-In Surplus			129				171
Retained Earnings			22,604				21,902
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income			1,504				1,035
Treasury Stock, at Cost - 131,496,716 and 123,673,969 Shares			(8,111	)			(7,383	)
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY			16,498				16,097
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY		$	51,440			$	50,433

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

---

Table of Contents

 

Page 4

THE CHUBB CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30

(in millions)

 

		2014				2013
Common Stock
Balance, Beginning of Year and End of Period		$	372			$	372
Paid-In-Surplus
Balance, Beginning of Year			171				178
Changes Related to Stock-Based Employee Compensation (includes tax benefit of $14 and $27)			(42	)			(52	)
Balance, End of Period			129				126
Retained Earnings
Balance, Beginning of Year			21,902				20,009
Net Income			948				1,235
Dividends Declared (per share $1.00 and $.88)			(246	)			(229	)
Balance, End of Period			22,604				21,015
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Unrealized Appreciation of Investments Including Unrealized Other-Than-Temporary Impairment Losses
Balance, Beginning of Year			1,225				2,013
Change During Period, Net of Tax			473				(696	)
Balance, End of Period			1,698				1,317
Postretirement Benefit Costs Not Yet Recognized in Net Income
Balance, Beginning of Year			(253	)			(717	)
Change During Period, Net of Tax			11				31
Balance, End of Period			(242	)			(686	)
Foreign Currency Translation Gains
Balance, Beginning of Year			63				135
Change During Period, Net of Tax			(15	)			(22	)
Balance, End of Period			48				113
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, End of Period			1,504				744
Treasury Stock, at Cost
Balance, Beginning of Year			(7,383	)			(6,163	)
Repurchase of Shares			(784	)			(649	)
Shares Issued Under Stock-Based Employee Compensation Plans			56				78
Balance, End of Period			(8,111	)			(6,734	)
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY		$	16,498			$	15,523

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

---

Table of Contents

 

Page 5

THE CHUBB CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30

(in millions)

 

		2014				2013
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Net Income		$	948			$	1,235
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Increase (Decrease) in Unpaid Losses and Loss Expenses, Net			87				(299	)
Increase in Unearned Premiums, Net			192				158
Increase in Premiums Receivable			(136	)			(130	)
Amortization of Premiums and Discounts on Fixed Maturities			93				91
Depreciation			27				28
Realized Investment Gains, Net			(241	)			(317	)
Other, Net			(192	)			(202	)
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities			778				564
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Proceeds from Fixed Maturities
Sales			2,377				1,138
Maturities, Calls and Redemptions			2,067				2,353
Proceeds from Sales of Equity Securities			136				273
Purchases of Fixed Maturities			(4,884	)			(4,053	)
Purchases of Equity Securities			(97	)			(92	)
Investments in Other Invested Assets, Net			112				280
Decrease in Short Term Investments, Net			259				514
Change in Receivable or Payable from Security Transactions Not Settled, Net			278				165
Purchases of Property and Equipment, Net			(26	)			(25	)
Other, Net			(3	)			—
Net Cash Provided by Investing Activities			219				553
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Repayment of Long Term Debt			—				(275	)
Decrease in Funds Held Under Deposit Contracts			(1	)			(4	)
Proceeds from Issuance of Common Stock Under Stock-Based Employee Compensation Plans			15				36
Repurchase of Shares			(774	)			(634	)
Dividends Paid to Shareholders			(234	)			(223	)
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities			(994	)			(1,100	)
Net Increase in Cash			3				17
Cash at Beginning of Year			52				50
Cash at End of Period		$	55			$	67

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

---

Table of Contents

 

Page 6

THE CHUBB CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1) General

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and include the accounts of The Chubb Corporation (Chubb) and its subsidiaries (collectively, the Corporation). Significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The amounts included in this report are unaudited but include those adjustments, consisting of normal recurring items, that management considers necessary for a fair presentation. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.

2) Invested Assets

(a) The amortized cost and fair value of fixed maturities and equity securities were as follows:

 

		June 30, 2014
		Amortized Cost				Gross Unrealized Appreciation				Gross Unrealized Depreciation				Fair Value
		(in millions)
Fixed maturities
Tax exempt		$	18,168			$	1,088			$	36			$	19,220
Taxable
U.S. government and government agency and authority obligations			1,245				43				2				1,286
Corporate bonds			8,809				405				20				9,194
Foreign government and government agency obligations			6,682				236				13				6,905
Residential mortgage-backed securities			229				22				1				250
Commercial mortgage-backed securities			1,180				28				1				1,207
			18,145				734				37				18,842
Total fixed maturities		$	36,313			$	1,822			$	73			$	38,062
Equity securities		$	1,106			$	878			$	15			$	1,969

---

Table of Contents

 

Page 7

 

		December 31, 2013
		Amortized Cost				Gross Unrealized Appreciation				Gross Unrealized Depreciation				Fair Value
		(in millions)
Fixed maturities
Tax exempt		$	17,808			$	802			$	189			$	18,421
Taxable
U.S. government and government agency and authority obligations			784				27				9				802
Corporate bonds			9,032				370				88				9,314
Foreign government and government agency obligations			6,719				206				35				6,890
Residential mortgage-backed securities			277				23				1				299
Commercial mortgage-backed securities			1,339				29				3				1,365
			18,151				655				136				18,670
Total fixed maturities		$	35,959			$	1,457			$	325			$	37,091
Equity securities		$	1,057			$	756			$	3			$	1,810

The fair value and amortized cost of fixed maturities at June 30, 2014 by contractual maturity were as follows:

 

		Fair Value				Amortized Cost
		(in millions)
Due in one year or less		$	1,967			$	1,946
Due after one year through five years			14,182				13,577
Due after five years through ten years			12,348				11,661
Due after ten years			8,108				7,720
			36,605				34,904
Residential mortgage-backed securities			250				229
Commercial mortgage-backed securities			1,207				1,180
		$	38,062			$	36,313

Actual maturities could differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations.

The Corporation’s equity securities comprise a diversified portfolio of primarily U.S. publicly-traded common stocks.

The Corporation is involved in the normal course of business with variable interest entities (VIEs) primarily as a passive investor in residential mortgage-backed securities, commercial mortgage-backed securities and private equity limited partnerships issued by third party VIEs. The Corporation is not the primary beneficiary of these VIEs. The Corporation’s maximum exposure to loss with respect to these investments is limited to the investment carrying values included in the Corporation’s consolidated balance sheet and any unfunded partnership commitments.

---

Table of Contents

 

Page 8

(b) The components of unrealized appreciation or depreciation, including unrealized other-than-temporary impairment losses, of investments carried at fair value were as follows:

 

		June 30 2014				December 31 2013
		(in millions)
Fixed maturities
Gross unrealized appreciation		$	1,822			$	1,457
Gross unrealized depreciation			73				325
			1,749				1,132
Equity securities
Gross unrealized appreciation			878				756
Gross unrealized depreciation			15				3
			863				753
			2,612				1,885
Deferred income tax liability			914				660
		$	1,698			$	1,225

The following table summarizes, for all investment securities in an unrealized loss position at June 30, 2014, the aggregate fair value and gross unrealized depreciation, including unrealized other-than-temporary impairment losses, by investment category and length of time that individual securities have continuously been in an unrealized loss position.

 

		Less Than 12 Months								12 Months or More								Total
		Fair Value				Gross Unrealized Depreciation				Fair Value				Gross Unrealized Depreciation				Fair Value				Gross Unrealized Depreciation
		(in millions)
Fixed maturities
Tax exempt		$	441			$	5			$	1,069			$	31			$	1,510			$	36
Taxable
U.S. government and government agency and authority obligations			510				—				36				2				546				2
Corporate bonds			502				2				1,097				18				1,599				20
Foreign government and government agency obligations			465				2				500				11				965				13
Residential mortgage-backed securities			2				—				6				1				8				1
Commercial mortgage-backed securities			55				—				40				1				95				1
			1,534				4				1,679				33				3,213				37
Total fixed maturities			1,975				9				2,748				64				4,723				73
Equity securities			62				15				—				—				62				15
		$	2,037			$	24			$	2,748			$	64			$	4,785			$	88

---

Table of Contents

 

Page 9

At June 30, 2014, approximately 570 individual fixed maturities and 10 individual equity securities were in an unrealized loss position. The Corporation does not have the intent to sell and it is not more likely than not that the Corporation will be required to sell these fixed maturities before the securities recover to their amortized cost value. In addition, the Corporation believes that none of the declines in the fair values of these fixed maturities relate to credit losses. The Corporation has the intent and ability to hold the equity securities in an unrealized loss position for a period of time sufficient to allow for the recovery of cost. The Corporation believes that none of the declines in the fair value of these fixed maturities and equity securities were other than temporary at June 30, 2014.

The following table summarizes, for all investment securities in an unrealized loss position at December 31, 2013, the aggregate fair value and gross unrealized depreciation, including unrealized other-than-temporary impairment losses, by investment category and length of time that individual securities have continuously been in an unrealized loss position.

 

		Less Than 12 Months								12 Months or More								Total
		Fair Value				Gross Unrealized Depreciation				Fair Value				Gross Unrealized Depreciation				Fair Value				Gross Unrealized Depreciation
		(in millions)
Fixed maturities
Tax exempt		$	3,417			$	144			$	307			$	45			$	3,724			$	189
Taxable
U.S. government and government agency and authority obligations			213				6				35				3				248				9
Corporate bonds			2,526				76				222				12				2,748				88
Foreign government and government agency obligations			1,735				32				75				3				1,810				35
Residential mortgage-backed securities			4				—				14				1				18				1
Commercial mortgage-backed securities			153				1				39				2				192				3
			4,631				115				385				21				5,016				136
Total fixed maturities			8,048				259				692				66				8,740				325
Equity securities			41				3				—				—				41				3
		$	8,089			$	262			$	692			$	66			$	8,781			$	328

---

Table of Contents

 

Page 10

The change in unrealized appreciation or depreciation of investments carried at fair value, including the change in unrealized other-than-temporary impairment losses, was as follows:

 

		Periods Ended June 30
		Second Quarter								Six Months
		2014				2013				2014				2013
		(in millions)
Change in unrealized appreciation of fixed maturities		$	255				$    (1,019	)		$	617			$	(1,215	)
Change in unrealized appreciation of equity securities			111				(57	)			110				145
			366				(1,076	)			727				(1,070	)
Deferred income tax (credit)			128				(376	)			254				(374	)
		$	238			$	(700	)		$	473			$	(696	)

(c) Realized investment gains and losses were as follows:

 

		Periods Ended June 30
		Second Quarter								Six Months
		2014				2013				2014				2013
		(in millions)
Fixed maturities
Gross realized gains		$	69			$	14			$	77			$	27
Gross realized losses			(17	)			(8	)			(28	)			(10	)
Other-than-temporary impairment losses			(4	)			—				(4	)			—
			48				6				45				17
Equity securities
Gross realized gains			23				119				89				174
Other-than-temporary impairment losses			(1	)			(5	)			(1	)			(7	)
			22				114				88				167
Other invested assets			55				59				108				133
		$	125			$	179			$	241			$	317

(d) As of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, fixed maturities still held by the Corporation for which a portion of their other-than-temporary impairment losses were recognized in other comprehensive income had cumulative credit-related losses of $19 million and $20 million, respectively, recognized in net income.

---

Table of Contents

 

Page 11

3) Comprehensive Income

Comprehensive income is defined as all changes in shareholders’ equity, except those arising from transactions with shareholders. Comprehensive income includes net income and other comprehensive income or loss, which for the Corporation consists of changes in unrealized appreciation or depreciation of investments carried at fair value, changes in unrealized other-than-temporary impairment losses of fixed maturities, changes in postretirement benefit costs not yet recognized in net income and changes in foreign currency translation gains or losses.

The components of other comprehensive income or loss were as follows:

 

		Periods Ended June 30, 2014
		Second Quarter												Six Months
		Before Tax				Income Tax				Net of Tax				Before Tax				Income Tax				Net of Tax
		(in millions)
Net unrealized holding gains arising during the period		$	436			$	153			$	283			$	860			$	301			$	559
Reclassification adjustment for net realized gains included in net income			70				25				45				133				47				86
Net unrealized gains recognized in other comprehensive income			366				128				238				727				254				473
Reclassification adjustment for the amortization of net actuarial loss and prior service cost included in net income (a)			(8	)			(3	)			(5	)			(17	)			(6	)			(11	)
Net change in postretirement benefit costs not yet recognized in net income			8				3				5				17				6				11
Foreign currency translation gains (losses)			6				2				4				(22	)			(7	)			(15	)
Total other comprehensive income		$	380			$	133			$	247			$	722			$	253			$	469

(a) Postretirement benefit costs recognized in net income during the period are included among several of the loss and expense components presented in the consolidated statements of income.

---

Table of Contents

 

Page 12

		Periods Ended June 30, 2013
		Second Quarter												Six Months
		Before Tax				Income Tax				Net of Tax				Before Tax				Income Tax				Net of Tax
		(in millions)
Net unrealized holding losses arising during the period		$	(956	)		$	(334	)		$	(622	)		$	(886	)		$	(310	)		$	(576	)
Reclassification adjustment for net realized gains included in net income			120				42				78				184				64				120
Net unrealized losses recognized in other comprehensive loss			(1,076	)			(376	)			(700	)			(1,070	)			(374	)			(696	)
Postretirement benefit gain (loss) not yet recognized in net income arising during the period			(1	)			(1	)			—				1				—				1
Reclassification adjustment for the amortization of net actuarial loss and prior service cost included in net income (a)			(23	)			(9	)			(14	)			(47	)			(17	)			(30	)
Net change in postretirement benefit costs not yet recognized in net income			22				8				14				48				17				31
Foreign currency translation gains (losses)			42				14				28				(35	)			(13	)			(22	)
Total other comprehensive loss		$	(1,012	)		$	(354	)		$	(658	)		$	(1,057	)		$	(370	)		$	(687	)

(a) Postretirement benefit costs recognized in net income during the period are included among several of the loss and expense components presented in the consolidated statements of income.

4) Segments Information

The principal business of the Corporation is the sale of property and casualty insurance. The profitability of the property and casualty insurance business depends on the results of both underwriting operations and investments, which are viewed as two distinct operations. The underwriting operations are managed and evaluated separately from the investment function.

The property and casualty insurance subsidiaries underwrite most lines of property and casualty insurance. Underwriting operations consist of four separate business units: personal insurance, commercial insurance, specialty insurance and reinsurance assumed. The personal segment targets the personal insurance market. The personal classes include automobile, homeowners and other personal coverages. The commercial segment includes those classes of business that are generally available in broad markets and are of a more commodity nature. Commercial classes include multiple peril, casualty, workers’ compensation and property and marine. The specialty segment includes those classes of business that are available in more limited markets since they require specialized underwriting and claim settlement. Specialty classes include professional liability coverages and surety. The reinsurance assumed business has been in runoff since the transfer of the ongoing reinsurance assumed business to a reinsurance company in 2005.

Corporate and other includes investment income earned on corporate invested assets, corporate expenses and the results of the Corporation’s non-insurance subsidiaries.

---

Table of Contents

 

Page 13

Revenues and income before income tax of each operating segment were as follows:

 

		Periods Ended June 30
		Second Quarter								Six Months
		2014				2013				2014				2013
		(in millions)
Revenues
Property and casualty insurance
Premiums earned
Personal insurance		$	1,102			$	1,050			$	2,178			$	2,081
Commercial insurance			1,305				1,299				2,605				2,607
Specialty insurance			656				645				1,309				1,311
Total insurance			3,063				2,994				6,092				5,999
Reinsurance assumed			1				1				1				—
			3,064				2,995				6,093				5,999
Investment income			345				361				696				724
Total property and casualty insurance			3,409				3,356				6,789				6,723
Corporate and other			8				16				18				28
Realized investment gains, net			125				179				241				317
Total revenues		$	3,542			$	3,551			$	7,048			$	7,068
Income (loss) before income tax
Property and casualty insurance
Underwriting
Personal insurance		$	45			$	75			$	47			$	225
Commercial insurance			71				124				182				319
Specialty insurance			140				96				222				191
Total insurance			256				295				451				735
Reinsurance assumed			1				6				1				10
			257				301				452				745
Increase in deferred policy acquisition costs			21				16				34				57
Underwriting income			278				317				486				802
Investment income			336				349				677				700
Other income (charges)			(2	)			9				(4	)			14
Total property and casualty insurance			612				675				1,159				1,516
Corporate and other			(59	)			(58	)			(119	)			(121	)
Realized investment gains, net			125				179				241				317
Total income before income tax		$	678			$	796			$	1,281			$	1,712

---

Table of Contents

 

Page 14

5) Fair Values of Financial Instruments

Fair values of financial instruments are determined by management using valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. Fair values are generally measured using quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities or other inputs, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, that are observable either directly or indirectly. In those instances where observable inputs are not available, fair values are measured using unobservable inputs for the asset or liability. Unobservable inputs reflect the Corporation’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability and are developed based on the best information available in the circumstances. Fair value estimates derived from unobservable inputs are affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rates and the estimated amounts and timing of future cash flows. The derived fair value estimates cannot be substantiated by comparison to independent markets and are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that would be realized in a current market exchange. Certain financial instruments, particularly insurance contracts, are excluded from fair value disclosure requirements.

The methods and assumptions used to estimate the fair values of financial instruments are as follows:

 

(i)

The carrying value of short term investments approximates fair value due to the short maturities of these investments.

 

(ii)

Fair values of fixed maturities are determined by management, utilizing prices obtained from a third party, nationally recognized pricing service or, in the case of securities for which prices are not provided by a pricing service, from third party brokers. For fixed maturities that have quoted prices in active markets, market quotations are provided. For fixed maturities that do not trade on a daily basis, the pricing service and brokers provide fair value estimates using a variety of inputs including, but not limited to, benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes, issuer spreads, bids, offers, reference data, prepayment rates and measures of volatility. Management reviews on an ongoing basis the reasonableness of the methodologies used by the relevant pricing service and brokers. In addition, management, using the prices received for the securities from the pricing service and brokers, determines the aggregate portfolio price performance and reviews it against applicable indices. If management believes that significant discrepancies exist, it will discuss these with the relevant pricing service or broker to resolve the discrepancies.

 

(iii)

Fair values of equity securities are determined by management, utilizing quoted market prices.

 

(iv)

Fair values of long term debt issued by Chubb are determined by management, utilizing prices obtained from a third party, nationally recognized pricing service.

---

Table of Contents

 

Page 15

The carrying values and fair values of financial instruments were as follows:

 

		June 30, 2014								December 31, 2013
		Carrying Value				Fair Value				Carrying Value				Fair Value
		(in millions)
Assets
Invested assets
Short term investments		$	1,845			$	1,845			$	2,114			$	2,114
Fixed maturities			38,062				38,062				37,091				37,091
Equity securities			1,969				1,969				1,810				1,810
Liabilities
Long term debt			3,300				3,989				3,300				3,806

At June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, a pricing service provided fair value amounts for approximately 99% of the Corporation’s fixed maturities. The prices obtained from a pricing service and brokers generally are non-binding, but are reflective of current market transactions in the applicable financial instruments.

At June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Corporation held an insignificant amount of financial instruments in its investment portfolio for which a lack of market liquidity impacted the determination of fair value.

The fair value hierarchy prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels as follows:

Level 1 – Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical financial instruments.

Level 2 – Other inputs that are observable for the financial instrument, either directly or indirectly.

Level 3 – Significant unobservable inputs.

---

Table of Contents

 

Page 16

The fair value of financial instruments categorized based upon the lowest level of input that was significant to the fair value measurement was as follows:

 

		June 30, 2014
		Level 1				Level 2				Level 3				Total
		(in millions)
Assets
Short term investments		$	284			$	1,561			$	—			$	1,845
Fixed maturities
Tax exempt			—				19,216				4				19,220
Taxable
U.S. government and government agency and authority obligations			—				1,286				—				1,286
Corporate bonds			—				9,066				128				9,194
Foreign government and government agency obligations			—				6,896				9				6,905
Residential mortgage-backed securities			—				246				4				250
Commercial mortgage-backed securities			—				1,196				11				1,207
			—				18,690				152				18,842
Total fixed maturities			—				37,906				156				38,062
Equity securities			1,963				—				6				1,969
		$	2,247			$	39,467			$	162			$	41,876
Liabilities
Long term debt		$	—			$	3,989			$	—			$	3,989

---

Table of Contents

 

Page 17

		December 31, 2013
		Level 1				Level 2				Level 3				Total
		(in millions)
Assets
Short term investments		$	399			$	1,715			$	—			$	2,114
Fixed maturities
Tax exempt			—				18,416				5				18,421
Taxable
U.S. government and government agency and authority obligations			—				802				—				802
Corporate bonds			—				9,179				135				9,314
Foreign government and government agency obligations			—				6,881				9				6,890
Residential mortgage-backed securities			—				293				6				299
Commercial mortgage-backed securities			—				1,345				20				1,365
			—				18,500				170				18,670
Total fixed maturities			—				36,916				175				37,091
Equity securities			1,803				—				7				1,810
		$	2,202			$	38,631			$	182			$	41,015
Liabilities
Long term debt		$	—			$	3,806			$	—			$	3,806

---

Table of Contents

 

Page 18

6) Earnings Per Share

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:

 

		Periods Ended June 30
		Second Quarter								Six Months
		2014				2013				2014				2013
		(in millions, except for per share amounts)
Basic earnings per share:
Net income		$	499			$	579			$	948			$	1,235
Weighted average shares outstanding			245.7				260.5				247.1				261.9
Basic earnings per share		$	2.03			$	2.22			$	3.84			$	4.72
Diluted earnings per share:
Net income		$	499			$	579			$	948			$	1,235
Weighted average shares outstanding			245.7				260.5				247.1				261.9
Additional shares from assumed issuance of shares under stock-based compensation awards			.5				1.0				.6				1.3
Weighted average shares and potential shares assumed outstanding for computing diluted earnings per share			246.2				261.5				247.7				263.2
Diluted earnings per share		$	2.03			$	2.21			$	3.83			$	4.69

---

Table of Contents

 

Page 19

Item 2 — Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations addresses the financial condition of the Corporation as of June 30, 2014 compared with December 31, 2013 and the results of operations for the six months and three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes contained in this report and the consolidated financial statements and related notes and management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations included in the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information

Certain statements in this document are “forward-looking statements” as that term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PSLRA). These forward-looking statements are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the PSLRA and include statements regarding market conditions in 2014, including premium volume, rate trends, the pricing environment and competition; the cost of our property reinsurance program in 2014; our loss reserve and reinsurance recoverable estimates; property and casualty investment income after taxes for the full year 2014; the repurchase of common stock under our share repurchase program; and our financial position, capital adequacy and funding of liquidity needs. Forward-looking statements frequently can be identified by words such as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “will,” “may,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “likely,” “estimate,” “predict,” “potential,” “continue,” or other similar expressions. Forward-looking statements are made based upon management’s current expectations and beliefs concerning trends and future developments and their potential effects on us. These statements are not guarantees of future performance. Actual results may differ materially from those suggested by forward-looking statements as a result of risks and uncertainties, which include, among others, those discussed or identified in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 and from time to time in our other public filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission and those associated with:

 

•

global political, economic and market conditions, particularly in the jurisdictions in which we operate and/or invest, including:

 

—

changes in credit ratings, interest rates, market credit spreads and the performance of the financial markets;

 

—

currency fluctuations;

 

—

the effects of inflation;

 

—

changes in domestic and foreign laws, regulations and taxes;

 

—

changes in competition and pricing environments;

 

—

regional or general changes in asset valuations;

 

—

the inability to reinsure certain risks economically; and

 

—

changes in the litigation environment;

 

•

the effects of the outbreak or escalation of war or hostilities;

 

•

the occurrence of terrorist attacks, including any nuclear, biological, chemical or radiological events;

---

Table of Contents

 

Page 20

•

premium pricing and profitability or growth estimates overall or by lines of business or geographic area, and related expectations with respect to the timing and terms of any required regulatory approvals;

 

•

adverse changes in loss cost trends;

 

•

our ability to retain existing business and attract new business at acceptable rates;

 

•

our expectations with respect to cash flow and investment income and with respect to other income;

 

•

the adequacy of our loss reserves, including:

 

—

our expectations relating to reinsurance recoverables;

 

—

the willingness of parties, including us, to settle disputes;

 

—

developments in judicial decisions or regulatory or legislative actions relating to coverage and liability, in particular, for asbestos, toxic waste and other mass tort claims;

 

—

development of new theories of liability;

 

—

our estimates relating to ultimate asbestos liabilities; and

 

—

the impact from the bankruptcy protection sought by various asbestos producers and other related businesses;

 

•

the availability and cost of reinsurance coverage;

 

•

the occurrence of significant weather-related or other natural or human-made disasters, particularly in locations where we have concentrations of risk or changes to our estimates (or the assessments of rating agencies and other third parties) of our potential exposure to such events;

 

•

the impact of economic factors on companies on whose behalf we have issued surety bonds, and in particular, on those companies that file for bankruptcy or otherwise experience deterioration in creditworthiness;

 

•

the effects of disclosures by, and investigations of, companies we insure, particularly with respect to our lines of business that have a longer time span, or tail, between the incidence of a loss and the settlement of the claim;

 

•

the impact of legislative, regulatory, judicial and similar developments on companies we insure, particularly with respect to our longer tail lines of business;

 

•

the impact of legislative, regulatory, judicial and similar developments on our business, including those relating to insurance industry reform, terrorism, catastrophes, the financial markets, solvency standards, capital requirements, accounting guidance and taxation;

 

•

any downgrade in our claims-paying, financial strength or other credit ratings;

---

Table of Contents

 

Page 21

•

the ability of our subsidiaries to pay us dividends;

 

•

our plans to repurchase shares of our common stock, including as a result of changes in:

 

—

our financial position and financial results;

 

—

our capital position and/or capital adequacy levels required to maintain our existing ratings from independent rating agencies;

 

—

our share price;

 

—

investment opportunities;

 

—

opportunities to profitably grow our property and casualty insurance business; and

 

—

corporate and regulatory requirements; and

 

•

our ability to implement management’s strategic plans and initiatives.

Chubb assumes no obligation to update any forward-looking information set forth in this document, which speak as of the date hereof.

Critical Accounting Estimates and Judgments

The consolidated financial statements include amounts based on informed estimates and judgments of management for transactions that are not yet complete. Such estimates and judgments affect the reported amounts in the financial statements. Those estimates and judgments that were most critical to the preparation of the financial statements involved the determination of loss reserves and the recoverability of related reinsurance recoverables and the evaluation of whether a decline in value of any investment is temporary or other than temporary. These estimates and judgments, which are discussed in Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 as supplemented within the following analysis of our results of operations, require the use of assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain and therefore are subject to change as facts and circumstances develop. If different estimates and judgments had been applied, materially different amounts might have been reported in the financial statements.

---

Table of Contents

 

Page 22

Overview

The following highlights do not address all of the matters covered in the other sections of Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations or contain all of the information that may be important to Chubb’s shareholders or the investing public. This overview should be read in conjunction with the other sections of Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

 

•

Net income was $948 million in the first six months of 2014 and $499 million in the second quarter compared with $1.2 billion and $579 million, respectively, in the same periods of 2013. Net income was lower in the first six months and second quarter of 2014 compared with the same periods of 2013 due to lower operating income and, to a lesser extent, lower net realized investment gains. We define operating income as net income excluding realized investment gains and losses after tax.

 

•

Operating income was $792 million in the first six months of 2014 and $418 million in the second quarter compared with $1.0 billion and $463 million, respectively, in the same periods of 2013. The lower operating income in the 2014 periods was due primarily to lower underwriting income in our property and casualty insurance business, particularly in the first six months and, to a lesser extent, a decrease in property and casualty investment income. Management uses operating income, a non-GAAP financial measure, among other measures, to evaluate its performance because the realization of investment gains and losses in any period could be discretionary as to timing and can fluctuate significantly, which could distort the analysis of operating trends.

 

•

Underwriting results were profitable in the first six months of 2014 compared with highly profitable results in the same period of 2013. Underwriting results were highly profitable in the second quarter of both years. Our combined loss and expense ratio was 91.6% in the first six months of 2014 and 90.0% in the second quarter compared with 86.7% and 88.8% in the respective periods of 2013. Results were less profitable in the first six months of 2014 compared to the same period of 2013 due primarily to a higher current accident year loss ratio excluding catastrophes and, to a lesser extent, a higher impact of catastrophes and a lower amount of favorable prior year loss development. Results were less profitable in the second quarter of 2014 compared to the same period of 2013 due primarily to a higher current accident year loss ratio excluding catastrophes and, to a lesser extent, a lower amount of favorable prior year loss development, offset in part by a lower impact of catastrophes. The impact of catastrophes accounted for 5.7 percentage points of the combined ratio in the first six months of 2014 and 4.8 percentage points in the second quarter compared with 4.3 and 7.9 percentage points, respectively, in the same periods of 2013.

 

•

During the first six months and second quarter of 2014, we estimate that we experienced overall favorable prior year loss development of about $325 million and $165 million, respectively, on loss reserves established as of the previous year end. We estimate that during the first six months and second quarter of 2013, we experienced overall favorable prior year loss development of about $405 million and $215 million, respectively. In each period we experienced favorable prior year loss development in each segment of our insurance business.

---

Table of Contents

 

Page 23

•

Total net premiums written increased by 2% in the first six months of 2014 and 4% in the second quarter compared with the same periods of 2013. Net premiums written in the United States increased by 4% in the first six months of 2014 and 5% in the second quarter. Net premiums written outside the United States decreased by 3% in the first six months of 2014 and increased by 1% in the second quarter in U.S. dollars. When measured in local currencies, such premiums were flat in the first six months of 2014 and increased modestly in the second quarter.

 

•

Property and casualty investment income after tax decreased by 4% in the first six months and second quarter of 2014 compared with the same periods of 2013, due to a decline in the average yield on our investment portfolio. Management uses property and casualty investment income after tax, a non-GAAP financial measure, to evaluate its investment results because it reflects the impact of any change in the proportion of tax exempt investment income to total investment income and is therefore more meaningful for analysis purposes than investment income before income tax.

 

•

Net realized investment gains before tax were $241 million ($156 million after tax) in the first six months of 2014 and $125 million ($81 million after tax) in the second quarter compared with $317 million ($206 million after tax) and $179 million ($116 million after tax), respectively, in the same periods of 2013. The net realized gains in the first six months of 2014 were primarily related to investments in limited partnerships, which generally are reported on a one quarter lag, sales of equity securities and, to a lesser extent, sales of fixed maturity securities. The net realized gains in the second quarter of 2014 were primarily related to investments in limited partnerships, sales of fixed maturity securities and, to a lesser extent, sales of equity securities. In the first six months and second quarter of 2013, net realized investment gains included the recognition of a gain in connection with the business combination of an issuer in which we held equity securities and warrants. The remaining net realized gains in the 2013 periods were primarily related to investments in limited partnerships and sales of equity securities.

A summary of our consolidated net income is as follows:

 

		Periods Ended June 30
		Six Months								Second Quarter
		2014				2013				2014				2013
		(in millions)
Property and casualty insurance		$	1,159			$	1,516			$	612			$	675
Corporate and other			(119	)			(121	)			(59	)			(58	)
Consolidated operating income before income tax			1,040				1,395				553				617
Federal and foreign income tax			248				366				135				154
Consolidated operating income			792				1,029				418				463
Realized investment gains after income tax			156				206				81				116
Consolidated net income		$	948			$	1,235			$	499			$	579

---

Table of Contents

 

Page 24

Property and Casualty Insurance

A summary of the results of operations of our property and casualty insurance business is as follows:

 

		Periods Ended June 30
		Six Months								Second Quarter
		2014				2013				2014				2013
		(in millions)
Underwriting
Net premiums written		$	6,285			$	6,157			$	3,223			$	3,100
Increase in unearned premiums			(192	)			(158	)			(159	)			(105	)
Premiums earned			6,093				5,999				3,064				2,995
Losses and loss expenses			3,637				3,262				1,792				1,694
Operating costs and expenses			1,983				1,974				1,004				991
Increase in deferred policy acquisition costs			(34	)			(57	)			(21	)			(16	)
Dividends to policyholders			21				18				11				9
Underwriting income			486				802				278				317
Investments
Investment income before expenses			696				724				345				361
Investment expenses			19				24				9				12
Investment income			677				700				336				349
Other income (charges)			(4	)			14				(2	)			9
Property and casualty income before tax		$	1,159			$	1,516			$	612			$	675
Property and casualty investment income after tax		$	552			$	574			$	275			$	286

Property and casualty income before tax was lower in the first six months and second quarter of 2014 compared with the same periods of 2013. The lower income in the 2014 periods was due to lower underwriting income, particularly in the first six months and, to a lesser extent, a decrease in investment income. The decrease in underwriting income in the first six months of 2014 compared with the same period of 2013 was primarily attributable to a higher current accident year loss ratio excluding catastrophes and, to a lesser extent, a higher impact of catastrophes and a lower amount of favorable prior year loss development. The decrease in underwriting income in the second quarter of 2014 compared with the same period of 2013 was due primarily to a higher current accident year loss ratio excluding catastrophes and, to a lesser extent, a lower amount of favorable prior year loss development, offset in part by a lower impact of catastrophes. The decrease in investment income in the first six months and second quarter of 2014 compared with the same periods of 2013 was due to a decline in the average yield on our investment portfolio.

---

Table of Contents

 

Page 25

The profitability of our property and casualty insurance business depends on the results of both our underwriting and investment operations. We view these as two distinct operations since the underwriting functions are managed separately from the investment function. Accordingly, in assessing our performance, we evaluate underwriting results separately from investment results.

Underwriting Results

We evaluate the underwriting results of our property and casualty insurance business in the aggregate and for each of our business units.

Net Premiums Written

Net premiums written were $6.3 billion in the first six months of 2014 and $3.2 billion in the second quarter compared with $6.2 billion and $3.1 billion, respectively, in the same periods of 2013. Net premiums written by business unit were as follows:

 

		Six Months Ended June 30												Quarter Ended June 30
		2014				2013				% Incr.				2014				2013				% Incr.
		(in millions)												(in millions)
Personal insurance		$	2,222			$	2,141				4	%		$	1,209			$	1,154				5	%
Commercial insurance			2,783				2,759				1				1,358				1,319				3
Specialty insurance			1,279				1,258				2				655				626				5
Total insurance			6,284				6,158				2				3,222				3,099				4
Reinsurance assumed			1				(1	)			*				1				1				*
Total		$	6,285			$	6,157				2			$	3,223			$	3,100				4

 

*	The change in net premiums written is not presented for this business unit since it is in runoff.

Net premiums written increased by 2% in the first six months of 2014 and 4% in the second quarter compared with the same periods of 2013. Net premiums written in the United States, which represented 75% of our total net premiums written in the first six months of 2014, increased by 4% in the first six months of 2014 and 5% in the second quarter. Net premiums written outside the United States decreased by 3% in the first six months of 2014 and increased by 1% in the second quarter in U.S. dollars. When measured in local currencies, such premiums were flat in the first six months of 2014 and increased modestly in the second quarter.

We classify business as written in the United States or outside the United States based on the location of the risk associated with the underlying policies. The method of determining location of risk varies by class of business. Location of risk for property classes is typically based on the physical location of the covered property, while location of risk for liability classes may be based on the main location of the insured, or in the case of the workers’ compensation class, the primary work location of the covered employee.

---

Table of Contents

 

Page 26

Growth in net premiums written in the United States in the first six months and second quarter of 2014 occurred in each segment of our business, with the most significant growth occurring in our personal insurance segment. Net premiums written in the United States increased modestly in the first six months and second quarter of 2014 in our commercial and specialty insurance segments. Growth in our personal insurance business in the first six months and second quarter of 2014 was attributable to higher rates upon renewal, higher insured exposures, strong retention of existing business, and new business. In the first six months and second quarter of 2014, net premiums written in our commercial insurance segment and our professional liability business, which is the predominant component of our specialty insurance segment, reflected higher rates, higher retention levels and an increase in new business compared with the same periods of 2013.

Average renewal rates for our personal insurance business in the United States were up modestly in the first six months and second quarter of 2014, driven particularly by our homeowners and excess liability classes of business. Retention levels in our personal insurance business in the United States remained strong in the first six months and second quarter of 2014. Average renewal rates in the first six months and second quarter of 2014 in the United States were up in both our commercial insurance and professional liability businesses, but more so in our professional liability business. The amounts of coverage purchased or the insured exposures, both of which are bases upon which we calculate the premiums we charge, were down slightly in our commercial insurance and professional liability businesses in the first six months and second quarter of 2014 compared with the same periods in 2013. We continued to retain a high percentage of our existing commercial insurance and professional liability business in the United States. Renewal retention levels in the first six months and second quarter of 2014 were modestly higher in our commercial insurance and professional liability businesses compared with those in the same periods of 2013. We continued to seek renewal rate increases in most of the classes within the commercial insurance and professional liability businesses and to take underwriting actions to improve profitability. As components of our business have approached rate adequacy due to pricing and underwriting actions over the last several years, the level of renewal rate increases has moderated and we have achieved higher retention levels. The level of new business in the United States was higher in both our commercial insurance and professional liability businesses in the first six months and second quarter of 2014 compared with the same periods of 2013.

Outside the United States, net premiums written decreased in each segment of our business in the first six months of 2014 compared with the same period of 2013. The most significant decrease occurred in our personal insurance segment driven by the effect of foreign currency translation. In the second quarter of 2014, increases in net premiums written outside the United States in our commercial and specialty insurance segments were partially offset by a decrease in our personal insurance segment. Net premiums written outside the United States excluding the effect of foreign currency translation were flat in each segment of our business in the first six months of 2014. Such premiums grew in the second quarter of 2014 in each segment of our business, but less so in the personal insurance segment.

---

Table of Contents

 

Page 27

Net premiums written in our personal insurance business outside the United States in the first six months and second quarter of 2014 reflected a modest overall average renewal rate increase, driven by a significant increase in our automobile business. Average renewal rates outside the United States were up slightly in both our commercial insurance and our professional liability businesses in the first six months and second quarter of 2014. Retention levels outside the United States were about the same for our commercial insurance and professional liability businesses in the first six months and second quarter of 2014 compared with the same periods of 2013. For our commercial insurance business, the level of new business written outside the United States was flat in the first six months of 2014 and modestly higher in the second quarter compared with the same periods of 2013. For our professional liability business, the level of new business written outside the United States was modestly higher in the first six months and second quarter of 2014 compared with the same periods of 2013.

We expect our net premiums written for the full year 2014 will increase at a rate similar to or slightly higher than the rate in the first half of the year, with an insignificant impact from foreign currency translation, assuming average foreign currency to U.S. dollar exchange rates for the remainder of the year remain similar to June 30, 2014 levels. We expect that market conditions will remain competitive but that the positive pricing environment, particularly in the United States, will continue during the remainder of 2014. However, we expect that the average renewal rate increases achieved in some of our commercial and professional liability classes of business may be at levels below those achieved in recent years.

Ceded Reinsurance

Our premiums written are net of amounts ceded to reinsurers who assume a portion of the risk under the insurance policies we write that are subject to reinsurance.

The most significant component of our ceded reinsurance program is property reinsurance. We purchase two main types of property reinsurance: catastrophe and property per risk.

For property risks in the United States and Canada we purchase traditional catastrophe reinsurance, including our primary treaty, which we refer to as our North American catastrophe treaty, as well as supplemental catastrophe reinsurance that provides additional coverage for our exposures in the northeast United States. For certain exposures in the United States, we have also arranged for the purchase of multi–year, collateralized reinsurance funded through the issuance of collateralized risk-linked securities, known as catastrophe bonds. For events outside the United States, we also purchase traditional catastrophe reinsurance.

---

Table of Contents

 

Page 28

We renewed our primary traditional property catastrophe treaties and our commercial property per risk treaty in April 2014 with limit structures similar to the expiring treaties. Certain coverage provided under the North American catastrophe treaty was modestly enhanced. The supplemental catastrophe reinsurance that provides coverage for our exposures in the northeast United States was renewed in June 2014 on terms similar to the expiring coverage. In March 2014, we arranged for the purchase of reinsurance through the issuance of a catastrophe bond to replace the portion of a catastrophe bond that expired in March 2014.

The North American catastrophe treaty has an initial retention of $500 million and provides coverage for exposures in the United States and Canada of approximately 34% of losses (net of recoveries from other available reinsurance) between $500 million and $900 million and approximately 75% of losses (net of recoveries) between $900 million and $1.75 billion. For certain catastrophic events in the northeast United States or along the southern U.S. coastline, the combination of the North American catastrophe treaty, supplemental catastrophe reinsurance and/or the catastrophe bond arrangements provide additional coverages as discussed below.

The catastrophe bond arrangements provide reinsurance coverage for specific types of losses in specific geographic locations. They are generally designed to supplement coverage provided under the North American catastrophe treaty. We currently have three catastrophe bond arrangements in effect that expire between 2015 and 2018. We have a $250 million reinsurance arrangement that expires in March 2015 and a $270 million reinsurance arrangement that incepted in March 2014 and expires in March 2018. Both of these catastrophe bond arrangements provide coverage for our exposure to homeowners and commercial losses related to certain perils, including hurricanes, earthquakes, severe thunderstorms and winter storms in twelve states in the northeast United States and the District of Columbia. The $270 million reinsurance arrangement provides similar coverage for named storms in addition to hurricanes. We also have a $150 million reinsurance arrangement that expires in March 2016 that provides coverage for homeowners-related hurricane and severe thunderstorm losses in eight states along the southern U.S. coastline.

For the indicated catastrophic events in the northeast United States, the combination of the North American catastrophe treaty, the supplemental catastrophe reinsurance, and the $250 million and $270 million catastrophe bond arrangements provides additional coverage of approximately 63% of losses (net of recoveries from other available reinsurance) between $1.75 billion and $3.65 billion.

For hurricane and severe thunderstorm events along the southern U.S. coastline, the $150 million catastrophe bond arrangement provides additional coverage of approximately 50% of homeowners-related hurricane and severe thunderstorm losses (net of recoveries from other available reinsurance) between $855 million and $1.15 billion.

---

Table of Contents

 

Page 29

For hurricane events in Florida, in addition to the coverage provided by the North American catastrophe treaty and the $150 million catastrophe bond arrangement discussed above, we have reinsurance from the Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund, which is a state-mandated fund designed to reimburse insurers for a portion of their residential catastrophic hurricane losses. Our participation in this program, for which the most recent annual period began on June 1, 2014, provides coverage of 90% of homeowners-related hurricane losses in Florida in excess of our initial retention of $160 million per event. Under the terms of the program, our aggregate recoveries during the annual coverage period are limited to approximately $385 million, based on our current level of participation.

Our primary property catastrophe treaty for events outside the United States, including Canada, provides coverage of approximately 75% of losses (net of recoveries from other available reinsurance) between $100 million and $350 million. For catastrophic events in Australia and Canada, additional reinsurance provides coverage of 80% of losses (net of recoveries from other available reinsurance) between $350 million and $475 million.

Our commercial property per risk treaty provides coverage for property exposures both inside and outside the United States. Depending upon the currency in which the covered insurance policy was issued, the treaty provides coverage per risk of approximately $565 million to $830 million in excess of our initial retention, which is generally between $25 million and $35 million.

In addition to our major property catastrophe and property per risk treaties, we purchase several smaller property treaties that provide coverage for specific classes of business or locations having concentrations of risk.

Recoveries under our property reinsurance treaties are subject to certain coinsurance requirements that affect the interaction of some elements of our reinsurance program.

Our property reinsurance treaties generally contain terrorism exclusions for acts perpetrated by foreign terrorists, and for nuclear, biological, chemical and radiological loss causes whether such acts are perpetrated by foreign or domestic terrorists.

The renewal rates associated with the North American catastrophe treaty, the catastrophe treaty that covers events outside the United States, the commercial property per risk treaty and the supplemental catastrophe reinsurance were lower than the rates for the expiring treaties. The costs related to the reinsurance purchased through the issuance of the catastrophe bond in March 2014 were also lower than those related to the expiring bond. We therefore expect that the overall cost of our property reinsurance program will be lower in 2014 than in 2013.

---

Table of Contents

 

Page 30

Profitability

The combined loss and expense ratio (or combined ratio), expressed as a percentage, is the key measure of underwriting profitability traditionally used in the property and casualty insurance business. Management evaluates the performance of our underwriting operations and of each of our business units using, among other measures, the combined loss and expense ratio calculated in accordance with U.S. statutory accounting principles. It is the sum of the ratio of losses and loss expenses to premiums earned (loss ratio) and the ratio of statutory underwriting expenses to premiums written (expense ratio) after reducing both premium amounts by dividends to policyholders. When the combined ratio is under 100%, underwriting results are generally considered profitable; when the combined ratio is over 100%, underwriting results are generally considered unprofitable.

Statutory accounting principles applicable to U.S. property and casualty insurance companies differ in certain respects from generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (GAAP). Under statutory accounting principles, policy acquisition and other underwriting expenses are recognized immediately, not at the time premiums are earned. Management uses underwriting results determined in accordance with GAAP, among other measures, to assess the overall performance of our underwriting operations. To convert statutory underwriting results to a GAAP basis, certain policy acquisition expenses are deferred and amortized over the period in which the related premiums are earned. Underwriting income determined in accordance with GAAP is defined as premiums earned less losses and loss expenses incurred and GAAP underwriting expenses incurred.

An accident year is the calendar year in which a loss occurs or, in the case of claims-made policies, the calendar year in which a loss is reported. The total losses and loss expenses incurred for a particular calendar year include current accident year losses and loss expenses as well as any increases or decreases to our estimates of losses and loss expenses that occurred in all prior accident years, which we refer to as prior year loss development.

Underwriting results were profitable in the first six months of 2014 compared with highly profitable results in the same period of 2013. Underwriting results were highly profitable in the second quarter of both years. The combined loss and expense ratio for our overall property and casualty business was as follows:

 

		Periods Ended June 30
		Six Months								Second Quarter
		2014				2013				2014				2013
Loss ratio			59.9	%			54.5	%			58.7	%			56.7	%
Expense ratio			31.7				32.2				31.3				32.1
Combined ratio			91.6	%			86.7	%			90.0	%			88.8	%

---

Table of Contents

 

Page 31

The loss ratio was higher in the first six months of 2014 and modestly higher in the second quarter compared with the same periods of 2013. The higher loss ratio in the first six months of 2014 compared with the same period of 2013 was due primarily to a higher current accident year loss ratio excluding catastrophes and, to a lesser extent, a higher impact of catastrophes and a lower amount of favorable prior year loss development. The higher loss ratio in the second quarter of 2014 compared with the same period in 2013 was due primarily to a higher current accident year loss ratio excluding catastrophes and, to a lesser extent, a lower amount of favorable prior year loss development, offset in part by a lower impact of catastrophes. In our personal insurance segment, the current accident year loss ratio excluding catastrophes was significantly higher in the first six months and second quarter of 2014 compared with the same periods of 2013. The higher current accident year loss ratio excluding catastrophes in our personal insurance segment was driven by an increase in both fire losses and non-catastrophe weather-related losses in our homeowners business compared with the 2013 periods. The current accident year loss ratio excluding catastrophes for our commercial insurance segment was slightly higher in the first six months of 2014 and modestly higher in the second quarter compared with the same periods of 2013. The higher current accident year loss ratio excluding catastrophes of our commercial insurance segment in the second quarter of 2014 compared to the same period of 2013 was driven by an increase in large fire losses and non-catastrophe weather-related losses primarily in our property and marine business. The current accident year loss ratio of our specialty insurance segment was similar in the first six months of 2014 and 2013, and was modestly lower in the second quarter of 2014 compared to the same period in 2013. The ratio in the first six months of 2014 was adversely impacted by a single, substantial surety loss in the first quarter.

Our underwriting profitability in any given period will be affected by the impact of catastrophes in that period. We define a catastrophe as an event that is estimated to cause $25 million or more in industry-wide insured property losses and affects a significant number of policyholders and insurers.

The net impact of catastrophes in the first six months of 2014 was $345 million, which represented 5.7 percentage points of the combined ratio, compared with $255 million or 4.3 percentage points in the same period of 2013. The net impact of catastrophes in the second quarter of 2014 was $146 million, which represented 4.8 percentage points of the combined ratio, compared with $237 million or 7.9 percentage points in the same period of 2013. A significant portion of the catastrophe losses in the first six months of 2014 related to weather-related events in the United States, including a severe winter freeze event in the first quarter which affected a widespread area of the United States. A significant portion of the catastrophe losses in the first six months of 2013 related to several severe storms in the central United States, as well as flooding in southern Alberta, Canada, primarily in the second quarter.

---

Table of Contents

 

Page 32

The individually significant events that contributed to catastrophe costs, including losses and any related reinsurance reinstatement premiums, during the first six months of 2014 and 2013 were as follows:

 

		(in millions)
2014
Winter freeze – 17 states in the United States – January 2014		$	130
Other events			215
Total		$	345
2013
Flooding – Alberta, Canada – June 2013		$	85
Other events			170
Total		$	255

The net impact of catastrophes in the first six months and second quarter of 2014 reflected $8 million and $1 million, respectively, of favorable prior year loss development. This compares to favorable prior year loss development of $6 million and $3 million, respectively, in the same periods of 2013.

The expense ratio was slightly lower in the first six months and second quarter of 2014 compared with the same periods of 2013. The lower ratio in the 2014 periods was due primarily to a slight decrease in overhead expenses and an increase in net premiums written, offset in part by a slight increase in commissions.

Review of Underwriting Results by Business Unit

Personal Insurance

Net premiums written from personal insurance, which represented 36% of our premiums written in the first six months of 2014, increased by 4% in the first six months of 2014 and 5% in the second quarter compared with the same periods of 2013. Net premiums written for the classes of business within the personal insurance segment were as follows:

 

		Six Months Ended June 30								% Incr.				Quarter Ended June 30
		2014				2013				(Decr.)				2014				2013				% Incr.
		(in millions)												(in millions)
Automobile		$	368			$	371				(1	)%		$	195			$	195				—	%
Homeowners			1,358				1,304				4				766				734				4
Other			496				466				6				248				225				10
Total personal		$	2,222			$	2,141				4			$	1,209			$	1,154				5

---

Table of Contents

 

Page 33

The increase in net premiums written in our personal insurance business in the first six months and second quarter of 2014 was driven by growth inside the United States. Premium growth occurred in all classes of our personal insurance business in the first six months and second quarter of 2014 inside the United States. Net premiums written outside the United States decreased in the first six months and second quarter of 2014, due to the negative impact of foreign currency translation. The overall growth in our personal insurance business was attributable to higher rates upon renewal, higher insured exposures, strong retention of existing business, and new business. Net premiums written for our personal automobile business decreased slightly in the first six months of 2014 and were flat in the second quarter compared with the same periods of 2013, as growth in the United States was offset by a decline in premiums written outside the United States. The decrease in net premiums written outside the United States was due to the negative impact of foreign currency translation. Personal automobile premiums written outside the United States represent about 40% of our annual worldwide personal automobile business, with more than half written in Brazil. Premiums in our homeowners business increased modestly in the first six months and second quarter of 2014 compared with the same periods of 2013, driven by growth in the United States, reflecting higher renewal rates, increases in the values insured on existing policies, as well as strong retention. Homeowners premiums outside the United States decreased in the first six months and second quarter of 2014 compared with the same periods of 2013, due to the negative impact of foreign currency translation. Premiums from our other personal business, which includes accident and health, excess liability and yacht coverages, increased in the first six months and second quarter of 2014 compared with the same periods of 2013, driven by significant growth inside the United States. Premiums from our other personal business written outside the United States decreased in the first six months and second quarter of 2014 compared with the same periods of 2013. The decrease in both periods reflected the negative impact of foreign currency translation. Premiums from our accident and health business increased in the first six months and second quarter of 2014. The increase was more significant in the second quarter, driven by growth inside the United States. Accident and health premiums written outside the United States decreased in the first six months and second quarter of 2014. Premiums for our excess liability business, most of which is written in the United States, grew significantly in the first six months and second quarter of 2014.

Our personal insurance business produced profitable underwriting results in the first six months and second quarter of 2014 compared with highly profitable results in the same periods of 2013. The combined loss and expense ratios for the classes of business within the personal insurance segment were as follows:

 

		Periods Ended June 30
		Six Months								Second Quarter
		2014				2013				2014				2013
Automobile			98.5	%			94.7	%			95.6	%			95.3	%
Homeowners			98.3				84.5				92.2				86.9
Other			92.8				93.6				93.1				93.3
Total personal			97.2				88.2				92.7				89.6

---

Table of Contents

 

Page 34

The deterioration in the underwriting results for our personal insurance business in the first six months of 2014 compared with the same period of 2013 was driven mainly by less profitable results in our homeowners business, due to a higher impact of fire losses and non-catastrophe weather-related losses, and to a lesser extent, a higher impact of catastrophes. The less profitable results for our personal insurance business in the second quarter of 2014 compared with the same period of 2013 were also driven by less profitable results in our homeowners business, mainly due to a higher impact of fire losses and non-catastrophe weather-related losses, offset in part by a lower impact of catastrophes. The impact of catastrophes represented 9.3 percentage points of the combined ratio for our personal insurance business in the first six months of 2014 and 7.5 percentage points in the second quarter compared with 8.3 and 12.7 percentage points, respectively, in the same periods of 2013.

Our personal automobile business produced profitable results in the first six months of 2014 and 2013, but more so in the 2013 period. The more profitable results in the first six months of 2013 were driven by more profitable results in the United States, which benefited from a modest amount of favorable prior year loss development. Results for this business were similarly profitable in the second quarter of both years as improved current accident year results in the 2014 period were offset by a lower amount of favorable prior year loss development compared to the same period of 2013. Results outside the United States for the first six months and the second quarter of 2014 and 2013 were near breakeven.

Homeowners results were profitable in the first six months and second quarter of 2014, compared with highly profitable results in the same periods of 2013. The less profitable results in the first six months of 2014 were due to a higher current accident year loss ratio excluding catastrophes, driven by an increase in fire losses and non-catastrophe weather-related losses, and, to a lesser extent, a higher impact of catastrophes. The less profitable results in the second quarter of 2014 were due primarily to a higher current accident year loss ratio excluding catastrophes, driven by an increase in fire losses and non-catastrophe weather-related losses, offset in part by a lower impact of catastrophes. Catastrophe losses represented 15.0 percentage points of the combined ratio for this class in the first six months of 2014 and 12.1 percentage points in the second quarter compared with 13.1 and 20.1 percentage points, respectively, in the same periods of 2013.

Our other personal business produced profitable results in the first six months and second quarter of 2014 and 2013. Our accident and health business produced modestly profitable results in the first six months of 2014 and 2013 and slightly profitable results in the second quarter of both years. In the United States, results for this business were profitable in the first six months and second quarter of both years. Results for this business outside the United States were modestly unprofitable in the first six months and second quarter of both years. Results for our personal excess liability business were similarly profitable in the first six months and second quarter of both years. Results for this business in each period benefited from favorable prior year loss development. Our yacht business produced highly profitable results in the first six months and second quarter of both years.

---

Table of Contents

 

Page 35

Commercial Insurance

Net premiums written from commercial insurance, which represented 44% of our premiums written in the first six months of 2014, increased by 1% in the first six months of 2014 and 3% in the second quarter compared with the same periods of 2013. Net premiums written for the classes of business within the commercial insurance segment were as follows:

 

		Six Months Ended June 30								% Incr. (Decr.)				Quarter Ended June 30								% Incr.
		2014				2013								2014				2013
		(in millions)												(in millions)
Multiple peril		$	546			$	549				(1	)%		$	285			$	277				3	%
Casualty			850				850				—				404				402				—
Workers’ compensation			595				565				5				285				266				7
Property and marine			792				795				—				384				374				3
Total commercial		$	2,783			$	2,759				1			$	1,358			$	1,319				3

Net premiums written in our commercial insurance business increased modestly in the first six months and second quarter of 2014 in the United States. Such premiums outside the United States decreased slightly in the first six months of 2014 but increased modestly in the second quarter. Overall, premium growth for our commercial insurance business in the first six months and second quarter of 2014 was constrained by lower renewal exposures and our continued efforts to secure adequate rates on renewal and new business in a market that continued to be competitive. The growth in our commercial insurance business in the first six months and second quarter of 2014 was driven by growth in the workers’ compensation class, reflecting rate increases, a continued strong retention level and new business. In the first six months of 2014, premiums written for the other classes within our commercial insurance business were either flat or decreased slightly. In the second quarter of 2014, modest growth occurred in the multiple peril and property and marine classes, while premiums written in the casualty class were flat. The positive overall rate environment experienced in recent years for commercial insurance in the United States continued in the first six months of 2014. Overall, average renewal rates in the United States increased modestly in the first six months and second quarter of 2014 for our commercial insurance business, with increases occurring in each class. Overall, average renewal rates outside the United States increased only slightly in the first six months and second quarter of 2014. Retention levels of our existing policyholders remained strong and were modestly higher in the first six months and second quarter of 2014 compared with the same periods of 2013. In the first six months and second quarter of 2014, the average renewal exposure change was down slightly both inside and outside the United States. The amount of new business in the United States was higher in the first six months and second quarter of 2014 compared with the same periods in 2013, as result of more opportunities to write business at appropriate rates. New business was flat in the first six months of 2014 outside the United States, but up modestly in the second quarter.

---

Table of Contents

 

Page 36

Our commercial insurance business produced profitable underwriting results in the first six months and second quarter of 2014 compared with highly profitable results in the same periods of 2013. The combined loss and expense ratios for the classes of business within the commercial insurance segment were as follows:

 

		Periods Ended June 30
		Six Months								Second Quarter
		2014				2013				2014				2013
Multiple peril			91.6	%			88.9	%			91.5	%			94.4	%
Casualty			87.4				94.0				85.3				94.8
Workers’ compensation			84.3				87.7				84.5				86.6
Property and marine			99.8				73.6				110.5				83.0
Total commercial			90.9				85.9				93.3				89.9

The less profitable results in our commercial insurance business in the first six months of 2014 compared with the same period of 2013 were due to a higher impact of catastrophes, a lower amount of favorable prior year loss development and a slightly higher current accident year loss ratio excluding catastrophes. The less profitable results in our commercial insurance business in the second quarter of 2014 compared with the same period in 2013 were due to a higher current accident year loss ratio excluding catastrophes and a lower amount of favorable prior year loss development, offset in part by a lower impact of catastrophes. The impact of catastrophes represented 5.5 percentage points of the combined ratio for our commercial insurance business in the first six months of 2014 and 4.9 percentage points in the second quarter compared with 3.2 and 8.1 percentage points, respectively, in the same periods of 2013. The current accident year loss ratio excluding catastrophes for our commercial insurance business increased slightly in the first six months of 2014 and increased modestly in the second quarter compared with the same periods of 2013. The current accident year loss ratio excluding catastrophes in the 2014 periods was adversely affected by a higher impact of large fire losses and non-catastrophe weather-related losses in the second quarter primarily in our property and marine business. Results for our commercial insurance business in all periods benefited from significant favorable prior year loss development and our disciplined risk selection in recent years.

Multiple peril results were profitable in the first six months of 2014 compared with highly profitable results in the same period of 2013. Results for this business were profitable in the second quarter of both years, but more so in 2014. The less profitable results in the first six months of 2014 were driven by less profitable results in the property component of this business due primarily to a higher impact of catastrophes. The more profitable results in the second quarter of 2014 compared with the same period of 2013 were due to improved results in both the property and liability components of this business. Results in the property component were profitable in the second quarter of both years, but more so in 2014 driven mainly by a lower impact of catastrophes. In the multiple peril class overall, the impact of catastrophes represented 7.2 percentage points of the combined ratio in the first six months of 2014 and 5.0 percentage points in the second quarter compared with 5.0 and 10.8 percentage points, respectively, in the same periods of 2013. The liability component of this business produced profitable results in the first six months of both years. Results for the liability component of this business were highly profitable in the second quarter of 2014 compared with profitable results in the same period of 2013.

---

Table of Contents

 

Page 37

Results for our casualty business were highly profitable in the first six months and second quarter of 2014 compared with profitable results in the same periods of 2013. Results for the primary liability component of this business were modestly profitable in the first six months and second quarter of 2014 compared with unprofitable results in the same periods of 2013. Results for this component in the 2013 periods reflected a high volume of large reported losses, many of which related to prior accident years. The automobile component of our casualty business produced unprofitable results in the first six months and second quarter of 2014 compared with profitable results in the same periods of 2013. Results for the excess liability component were highly profitable in the first six months and second quarter of both 2014 and 2013. Results for the excess liability component of our casualty business in all periods benefited from substantial favorable prior year loss development. Overall results for our casualty business were adversely affected by incurred losses related to toxic waste claims in the first six months of 2014 and incurred losses related to both asbestos and toxic waste claims in the same period of 2013. Overall casualty results were adversely affected by incurred losses related to toxic waste claims in the second quarter of 2014 and incurred losses related to asbestos claims in the same period of 2013. Our analysis of these exposures resulted in increases in the estimate of our ultimate liabilities. Such losses represented 1.5 and 4.0 percentage points of the combined ratio for this class in the first six months of 2014 and 2013, respectively, and 3.0 and 4.4 percentage points in the second quarter of 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Workers’ compensation results were highly profitable in the first six months and second quarter of both 2014 and 2013, but more so in the 2014 periods. The more profitable results in the 2014 periods were mainly due to improved current accident year results compared with the same periods of 2013. Results in each period reflected favorable prior year loss development. Results also reflected improved pricing and our disciplined risk selection during the past several years.

Property and marine results were near breakeven in the first six months of 2014 and unprofitable in the second quarter compared with highly profitable results in the same periods of 2013. The less profitable results in the first six months of 2014 were due to a significantly higher current accident year loss ratio excluding catastrophes, due in large part to a higher impact of large fire losses and non-catastrophe weather-related losses, as well as a higher impact of catastrophes. Results in the first six months of 2013 also benefited from a significant amount of favorable prior year loss development. The unprofitable results in the second quarter of 2014 were due to a significantly higher current accident year loss ratio excluding catastrophes, which reflected a higher impact of large fire losses and non-catastrophe weather-related losses. Results in the second quarter of 2014 were also adversely impacted by unfavorable prior year loss development whereas results in the same period of 2013 benefited from a significant amount of favorable prior year loss development. These adverse impacts were offset in part by a lower impact of catastrophes in the second quarter of 2014. The impact of catastrophes represented 13.9 percentage points of the combined ratio in the first six months of 2014 and 13.1 percentage points in the second quarter compared with 6.7 and 19.9 percentage points, respectively, in the same periods of 2013.

---

Table of Contents

 

Page 38

Specialty Insurance

Net premiums written from specialty insurance, which represented 20% of our premiums written in the first six months of 2014, increased by 2% in the first six months of 2014 and 5% in the second quarter compared with the same periods of 2013. Net premiums written for the classes of business within the specialty insurance segment were as follows:

 

		Six Months Ended June 30								% Incr. (Decr.)				Quarter Ended June 30								% Incr.
		2014				2013								2014				2013
		(in millions)												(in millions)
Professional liability		$	1,124			$	1,098				2	%		$	572			$	549				4	%
Surety			155				160				(3	)			83				77				8
Total specialty		$	1,279			$	1,258				2			$	655			$	626				5

Net premiums written in our professional liability business increased by 2% in the first six months of 2014 and 4% in the second quarter compared with the same periods of 2013. Net premiums written in the United States were modestly higher in the first six months and second quarter of 2014 compared with the same periods in 2013. Net premiums written outside the United States were slightly higher in the first six months of 2014 and modestly higher in the second quarter compared with the same periods of 2013. Overall premium growth in both periods of 2014 included the modestly positive effect of our decision not to renew a reinsurance program, which expired July 1, 2013, that provided coverage for a portion of our professional liability business. Premium growth in the professional liability business remained somewhat constrained as we continued our focus on profitability in the pricing of renewal policies and new business, in what remains a competitive marketplace. Nevertheless, the overall rate environment remained positive, particularly in the United States. We continued to pursue rate increases on our professional liability business to address margin compression experienced in these classes of business in recent years. Retention levels for the classes within our professional liability business remained strong. Retention levels were modestly higher in the United States and substantially unchanged outside the United States in the first six months and second quarter of 2014 compared with those in the same period of 2013. New business volume was modestly higher in the first six months and second quarter of 2014 compared with the same periods of 2013, with increases occurring both inside and outside the United States. The new business volume in the 2014 periods reflected slightly more opportunities to write suitably-priced business in select classes due to the positive pricing trends in the market over the last two years. Average renewal rates for our professional liability business in the United States increased in the first six months and second quarter of 2014. Rate increases occurred in most classes of this business. Overall, average renewal rates outside the United States were up slightly in the first six months and second quarter of 2014.

---

Table of Contents

 

Page 39

The decrease in net premiums written in our surety business in the first six months of 2014 was driven by a decline in premiums written outside the United States, due primarily to a decrease in premiums written in Latin America. The decrease in premiums written outside the United States in the first six months of 2014 was mainly driven by a lower number of new contracts requiring a surety bond being awarded to our existing customers compared with the same period of 2013. Premiums written inside the United States in our surety business increased modestly in the first six months of 2014. The increase in net premiums written in the second quarter of 2014 was driven by significant growth in premiums written inside the United States, due primarily to an increase in construction activity among a few of our larger customers. The timing of contract awards to our customers can vary and, as a result, premium growth in our surety business varies from period to period.

Our specialty insurance business produced highly profitable underwriting results in the first six months and second quarter of 2014 and 2013. The combined loss and expense ratios for the classes of business within the specialty insurance segment were as follows:

 

		Periods Ended June 30
		Six Months								Second Quarter
		2014				2013				2014				2013
Professional liability			83.9	%			92.1	%			83.2	%			91.9	%
Surety			82.2				46.6				45.3				42.1
Total specialty			83.7				86.7				78.7				86.0

Our professional liability business produced highly profitable results in the first six months and second quarter of 2014 compared with profitable results in the same periods of 2013. The more profitable results in the 2014 periods were due to a higher amount of favorable prior year loss development and improved current accident year results compared with the same periods of 2013.

Results for the directors and officers liability class were highly profitable in the first six months and second quarter of 2014 and 2013. Results in all periods benefited from favorable prior year loss development. Results for the fidelity class were profitable in the first six months and second quarter of 2014 compared with unprofitable results in the same periods of 2013. Results for the fidelity class reflected unfavorable prior year loss development in all periods, but more so in the 2013 periods. Results for the employment practices liability class were modestly unprofitable in the first six months and second quarter of 2014 compared with highly unprofitable results in the same periods of 2013. Results for this class in the first six months and second quarter of 2013 were adversely affected by unfavorable prior year loss development. Results for the errors and omissions liability class were similarly unprofitable in the first six months of 2014 and 2013 as improved current accident year results in 2014 were largely offset by adverse prior year loss development. Results for this class were unprofitable in the second quarter of 2014 compared with highly unprofitable results in the same period of 2013. Results in the second quarter of both years reflected unfavorable prior year loss development, but more so in 2013. Results for the fiduciary liability class were highly profitable in the first six months and second quarter of both 2014 and 2013. Results for this class reflected favorable prior year loss development in all periods.

---

Table of Contents

 

Page 40

Our surety business produced highly profitable results in the first six months and second quarter of 2014 and 2013. Results in the first six months of 2014 were less profitable than the same period of 2013 due to the impact of one large loss in the first quarter outside the United States. Our surety business tends to be characterized by losses that are infrequent but have the potential to be highly severe.

Reinsurance Assumed

Net premiums written from our reinsurance assumed business, which is in runoff, were not significant in the first six months and second quarter of 2014 or 2013. This business produced breakeven results in the first six months and second quarter of 2014 compared with profitable results in the same periods of 2013. Results in the 2013 periods benefited from favorable prior year loss development.

Catastrophe Risk Management

Our property and casualty subsidiaries have exposure to losses caused by natural perils such as hurricanes and other windstorms, earthquakes, severe winter weather and brush fires as well as from man-made catastrophic events such as terrorism. The frequency and severity of catastrophes are inherently unpredictable.

The extent of losses from a catastrophe is a function of both the total amount of insured exposure in an area affected by the event and the severity of the event. We regularly assess our concentrations of risk in catastrophe exposed areas globally and have strategies and underwriting standards to manage these exposures through individual risk selection, subject to regulatory constraints, and through the purchase of catastrophe reinsurance coverage. We use catastrophe modeling and a risk concentration management tool to monitor and control our accumulations of potential losses in catastrophe exposed areas in the United States, such as California and the gulf and east coasts, as well as in catastrophe exposed areas in other countries. The information provided by the catastrophe modeling and the risk concentration management tool has resulted in our non-renewing or reducing our exposure on some accounts and refraining from writing others.

Catastrophe modeling generally relies on multiple inputs based on experience, science, engineering and history, and the selection of those inputs requires a significant amount of judgment. The modeling results may also fail to account for risks that are outside the range of normal probability or are otherwise unforeseen. Because of this, actual results may differ materially from those derived from our modeling exercises.

We also continue to actively explore and analyze credible scientific evidence, including the potential impact of global climate change, that may affect our ability to manage our exposure under the insurance policies we issue as well as the impact that laws and regulations intended to combat climate change may have on us.

Despite our efforts to manage our catastrophe exposure, the occurrence of one or more severe catastrophic events could have a material effect on the Corporation’s results of operations, financial condition or liquidity.

---

Table of Contents

 

Page 41

Loss Reserves

Unpaid losses and loss expenses, also referred to as loss reserves, are the largest liability of our property and casualty subsidiaries.

Our loss reserves include case estimates for claims that have been reported and estimates for claims that have been incurred but not reported at the balance sheet date as well as estimates of the expenses associated with processing and settling all reported and unreported claims, less estimates of anticipated salvage and subrogation recoveries. Estimates are based upon past loss experience modified for current trends as well as prevailing economic, legal and social conditions. Our loss reserves are not discounted to present value.

We regularly review our loss reserves using a variety of actuarial techniques. We update the reserve estimates as historical loss experience develops, additional claims are reported and/or settled and new information becomes available. Any changes in estimates are reflected in operating results in the period in which the estimates are changed.

Incurred but not reported (IBNR) reserve estimates are generally calculated by first projecting the ultimate cost of all claims that have occurred and then subtracting reported losses and loss expenses. Reported losses include cumulative paid losses and loss expenses plus case reserves. The IBNR reserve includes a provision for claims that have occurred but have not yet been reported to us, some of which are not yet known to the insured, as well as a provision for future development on reported claims. A relatively large proportion of our net loss reserves, particularly for long tail liability classes, are reserves for IBNR losses. In fact, about 75% of our aggregate net loss reserves at June 30, 2014 were for IBNR losses.

---

Table of Contents

 

Page 42

Our gross case and IBNR loss reserves and related reinsurance recoverable by class of business were as follows:

 

		Gross Loss Reserves												Reinsurance Recoverable				Net Loss Reserves
June 30, 2014		Case				IBNR				Total
		(in millions)
Personal insurance
Automobile		$	268			$	144			$	412			$	15			$	397
Homeowners			452				391				843				45				798
Other			346				737				1,083				88				995
Total personal			1,066				1,272				2,338				148				2,190
Commercial insurance
Multiple peril			612				1,214				1,826				45				1,781
Casualty			1,406				5,508				6,914				395				6,519
Workers’ compensation			1,079				2,057				3,136				288				2,848
Property and marine			807				523				1,330				394				936
Total commercial			3,904				9,302				13,206				1,122				12,084
Specialty insurance
Professional liability			1,225				5,847				7,072				312				6,760
Surety			21				59				80				6				74
Total specialty			1,246				5,906				7,152				318				6,834
Total insurance			6,216				16,480				22,696				1,588				21,108
Reinsurance assumed			148				283				431				141				290
Total		$	6,364			$	16,763			$	23,127			$	1,729			$	21,398

 

		Gross Loss Reserves												Reinsurance Recoverable				Net Loss Reserves
December 31, 2013		Case				IBNR				Total
		(in millions)
Personal insurance
Automobile		$	265			$	141			$	406			$	16			$	390
Homeowners			414				357				771				56				715
Other			345				713				1,058				90				968
Total personal			1,024				1,211				2,235				162				2,073
Commercial insurance
Multiple peril			598				1,190				1,788				43				1,745
Casualty			1,565				5,398				6,963				387				6,576
Workers’ compensation			1,023				2,047				3,070				277				2,793
Property and marine			834				492				1,326				440				886
Total commercial			4,020				9,127				13,147				1,147				12,000
Specialty insurance
Professional liability			1,390				5,842				7,232				343				6,889
Surety			19				56				75				4				71
Total specialty			1,409				5,898				7,307				347				6,960
Total insurance			6,453				16,236				22,689				1,656				21,033
Reinsurance assumed			169				288				457				146				311
Total		$	6,622			$	16,524			$	23,146			$	1,802			$	21,344

---

Table of Contents

 

Page 43

Loss reserves, net of reinsurance recoverable, increased by $54 million during the first six months of 2014. Loss reserves related to our insurance business increased by $75 million during the first six months of 2014, which reflected an increase of $78 million related to catastrophe losses and a decrease of approximately $33 million related to the effect of foreign currency translation due to the stronger U.S. dollar at June 30, 2014 compared with December 31, 2013. Loss reserves related to our reinsurance assumed business, which is in runoff, decreased by $21 million.

The increase in our homeowners gross loss reserves during the first six months of 2014 was driven by catastrophe-related losses, fire losses and non-catastrophe weather-related losses. The decrease in gross loss reserves in the professional liability classes was due to lower case reserves as a result of paid claim activity during the first six months of 2014.

In establishing the loss reserves of our property and casualty subsidiaries, we consider facts currently known and the present state of the law and coverage litigation. Based on all information currently available, we believe that the aggregate loss reserves at June 30, 2014 were adequate to cover claims for losses that had occurred as of that date, including both those known to us and those yet to be reported. However, as discussed in Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, there are significant uncertainties inherent in the loss reserving process. It is therefore possible that management’s estimate of the ultimate liability for losses that had occurred as of June 30, 2014 may change, which could have a material effect on the Corporation’s results of operations and financial condition.

Changes in loss reserve estimates are unavoidable because such estimates are subject to the outcome of future events. Loss trends vary and time is required for changes in trends to be recognized and confirmed. Reserve changes that increase previous estimates of ultimate cost are referred to as unfavorable or adverse development or reserve strengthening. Reserve changes that decrease previous estimates of ultimate cost are referred to as favorable development or reserve releases.

We estimate that we experienced overall favorable prior year development of about $325 million during the first six months of 2014 and $165 in the second quarter compared with favorable prior year development of about $405 million and $215 million, respectively, in the same periods of 2013, on loss reserves established as of the respective previous year end.

The favorable development in the first six months of 2014 was primarily in the professional liability classes due to favorable loss experience related mainly to accident years 2010 and prior, and in the commercial liability classes due to favorable loss experience related mainly to accident years 2012 and prior. The favorable development in the first six months of 2013 was primarily in the commercial property classes, partly due to lower than expected severity primarily in the 2012 accident year and, to a lesser extent, in the commercial liability classes due to favorable loss experience related mainly to accident years 2010 and prior, and in the professional liability classes due to favorable loss experience related mainly to accident years 2008 and prior.

---

Table of Contents

 

Page 44

Investment Results

Property and casualty investment income before taxes decreased by 3% in the first six months of 2014 and 4% in the second quarter compared with the same periods in 2013. The decrease was due to a decline in the average yield on our property and casualty subsidiaries’ investment portfolio. The decrease in the average yield on the investment portfolio for the first six months and second quarter of 2014 compared with the same periods of 2013 resulted from lower reinvestment yields on securities that we purchased to replace fixed maturities that matured, were redeemed by the issuer or were sold since the second quarter of 2013. For the first six months of 2014, the impact of the decline in average yield was partially offset by the impact of a slight increase in our average invested assets. Our property and casualty subsidiaries held only a slightly higher amount of average invested assets in the first six months of 2014 and a similar amount in the second quarter compared with the same periods in 2013. While the property and casualty subsidiaries generated substantial operating cash flows in the last six months of 2013 and the first six months of 2014, average invested assets were also impacted by substantial dividend distributions made by the property and casualty subsidiaries to Chubb during 2013 and the first quarter of 2014.

The effective tax rate on our investment income was 18.5% in the first six months of 2014 compared with 18.0% in the same period of 2013. The effective tax rate fluctuates as the proportion of tax exempt investment income relative to total investment income changes from period to period.

On an after-tax basis, property and casualty investment income decreased by 4% in the first six months and the second quarter of 2014 compared with the same periods in 2013. The after-tax annualized yield on our property and casualty subsidiaries’ investment portfolio was 2.80% and 2.91% in the first six months of 2014 and 2013, respectively.

We expect that property and casualty investment income after taxes will decline for the full year 2014, assuming the average yield on fixed maturity securities available in the market and the average foreign currency to U.S. dollar exchange rates for the last six months of 2014 are both similar to June 30, 2014 levels. This expected decline reflects the actual results for the first six months of 2014 as well as the expected effect of having invested funds from securities that matured in 2013 and 2014 in securities with yields lower than the yields on the maturing securities, and the expectation that this pattern will continue during the remainder of 2014. The expected decline in property and casualty investment income after taxes in 2014 also reflects an assumption that average invested assets in 2014 will be slightly higher than 2013, based on our expectations of cash flows during the year.

Other Income and Charges

Other income and charges, which includes miscellaneous income and expenses of the property and casualty subsidiaries, was not significant in the first six months of 2014 and 2013.

---

Table of Contents

 

Page 45

Corporate and Other

Corporate and other comprises investment income earned on corporate invested assets, interest expense and other expenses not allocated to our operating subsidiaries and the results of our non-insurance subsidiaries.

Corporate and other produced a loss before taxes of $119 million in the first six months of 2014 compared with a loss of $121 million for the same period of 2013.

Realized Investment Gains and Losses

Net realized investment gains and losses were as follows:

 

		Periods Ended June 30
		Six Months								Second Quarter
		2014				2013				2014				2013
		(in millions)
Net realized gains
Fixed maturities		$	49			$	17			$	52			$	6
Equity securities			89				174				23				119
Other invested assets			108				133				55				59
			246				324				130				184
Other-than-temporary impairment losses
Fixed maturities			(4	)			—				(4	)			—
Equity securities			(1	)			(7	)			(1	)			(5	)
			(5	)			(7	)			(5	)			(5	)
Realized investment gains before tax		$	241			$	317			$	125			$	179
Realized investment gains after tax		$	156			$	206			$	81			$	116

In the first six months and second quarter of 2013, the net realized gains of equity securities and other invested assets included $74 million and $10 million, respectively, related to the exchange of our holdings of common stock and warrants of Alterra Capital Holdings Limited for common stock of Markel Corporation and cash as a result of a business combination that took place during the second quarter of 2013.

The net realized gains and losses of other invested assets include primarily the aggregate of realized gain distributions to us from the limited partnerships in which we have an interest and changes in our equity in the net assets of those partnerships based on valuations provided to us by the manager of each partnership. Due to the timing of our receipt of valuation data from the investment managers, the value of these investments and any related realized gains and losses are generally reported on a one quarter lag.

---

Table of Contents

 

Page 46

The net realized gains of the limited partnerships reported in the first six months of 2014 primarily reflected the positive performance of the global equity and high yield investment markets in the first quarter of 2014 and the fourth quarter of 2013. The net realized gains of the limited partnerships reported in the first six months of 2013 primarily reflected the positive performance of the global equity and high yield investment markets in the first quarter of 2013 and the fourth quarter of 2012.

We regularly review invested assets that have a fair value less than cost to determine if an other-than-temporary decline in value has occurred. We have a monitoring process overseen by a committee of investment and accounting professionals that is responsible for identifying those securities to be specifically evaluated for a potential other-than-temporary impairment.

The determination of whether a decline in value of any investment is temporary or other than temporary requires the judgment of management. The assessment of other-than-temporary impairment of fixed maturities and equity securities is based on both quantitative criteria and qualitative information. A number of factors are considered including, but not limited to, the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than the cost, the financial condition and near term prospects of the issuer, whether the issuer is current on contractually obligated interest and principal payments, general market conditions and industry or sector specific factors. The decision to recognize a decline in the value of a security carried at fair value as other than temporary rather than temporary has no impact on shareholders’ equity.

In determining whether fixed maturities are other than temporarily impaired, we are required to recognize an other-than-temporary impairment loss when we conclude that we have the intent to sell or it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell an impaired fixed maturity before the security recovers to its amortized cost value or it is likely we will not recover the entire amortized cost value of an impaired security. If we have the intent to sell or it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell an impaired fixed maturity before the security recovers to its amortized cost value, the security is written down to fair value and the entire amount of the writedown is included in net income as a realized investment loss. For all other impaired fixed maturities, when the impairment is determined to be other than temporary, the impairment loss is separated into the amount representing the credit loss and the amount representing the loss related to all other factors. The amount of the impairment loss that represents the credit loss is included in net income as a realized investment loss and the amount of the impairment loss that relates to all other factors is included in other comprehensive income.

In determining whether equity securities are other than temporarily impaired, we consider our intent and ability to hold a security for a period of time sufficient to allow us to recover our cost. If a decline in the fair value of an equity security is deemed to be other than temporary, the security is written down to fair value and the amount of the writedown is included in net income as a realized investment loss.

---

Table of Contents

 

Page 47

Capital Resources and Liquidity

Capital resources and liquidity represent a company’s overall financial strength and its ability to generate cash flows, borrow funds at competitive rates and raise new capital to meet operating and growth needs.

Capital Resources

Capital resources provide protection for policyholders, furnish the financial strength to support the business of underwriting insurance risks and facilitate continued business growth. At June 30, 2014, the Corporation had shareholders’ equity of $16.5 billion and total debt of $3.3 billion.

Management regularly monitors the Corporation’s capital resources. In connection with our long term capital strategy, Chubb from time to time contributes capital to its property and casualty subsidiaries. In addition, in order to satisfy capital needs as a result of any rating agency capital adequacy or other future rating issues, or in the event we were to need additional capital to make strategic investments in light of market opportunities, we may take a variety of actions, which could include the issuance of additional debt and/or equity securities. We believe that our strong financial position and current debt level provide us with the flexibility and capacity to obtain funds externally through debt or equity financings on both a short term and long term basis.

In January 2013, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $1.3 billion of Chubb’s common stock. Repurchases under this authorization were completed in January 2014. On January 30, 2014, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $1.5 billion of Chubb’s common stock. During the first six months of 2014, under these two authorizations we repurchased 8,752,012 shares of Chubb’s common stock in open market transactions at a cost of $784 million. As of June 30, 2014, $823 million remained under the January 2014 authorization. This authorization has no expiration date. We expect to complete the repurchase of shares under this authorization by the end of January 2015, subject to market conditions and other factors.

Ratings

Chubb and its property and casualty insurance subsidiaries are rated by major rating agencies. These ratings reflect the rating agency’s opinion of our financial strength, operating performance, strategic position and ability to meet our obligations to policyholders.

Credit ratings assess a company’s ability to make timely payments of interest and principal on its debt. Financial strength ratings assess an insurer’s ability to meet its financial obligations to policyholders.

Ratings are an important factor in establishing our competitive position in the insurance markets. There can be no assurance that our ratings will continue for any given period of time or that they will not be changed.

---

Table of Contents

 

Page 48

It is possible that one or more of the rating agencies may raise or lower our existing ratings in the future. If our credit ratings were downgraded, we might incur higher borrowing costs and might have more limited means to access capital. A downgrade in our financial strength ratings could adversely affect the competitive position of our insurance operations, including a possible reduction in demand for our products in certain markets.

Liquidity

Liquidity is a measure of a company’s ability to generate sufficient cash flows to meet the short and long term cash requirements of its business operations.

The Corporation’s liquidity requirements in the past have generally been met by funds from operations and we expect that funds from operations will continue to be sufficient to meet such requirements in the future. Liquidity requirements could also be met by funds received upon the maturity or sale of marketable securities in our investment portfolio. The Corporation also has the ability to borrow under its $500 million credit facility and we believe we could issue debt or equity securities.

Our property and casualty operations provide liquidity in that insurance premiums are generally received months or even years before losses are paid under the policies purchased by such premiums. Cash receipts from operations, consisting of insurance premiums and investment income, provide funds to pay losses, operating expenses and dividends to Chubb. Cash receipts in excess of required cash outflows can be used to build the investment portfolio, with the expectation of generating additional investment income in the future.

Our strong underwriting and investment results generated substantial positive operating cash flows in the first six months of 2014 and 2013. The cash provided by the property and casualty subsidiaries’ operating activities increased in the first six months of 2014 compared with the same period of 2013 primarily as a result of modestly higher premium collections and lower tax payments. During the first six months of 2014, the cash used by the property and casualty subsidiaries for financing activities (primarily the payment of dividends to Chubb) exceeded the cash provided by the property and casualty subsidiaries’ operating activities by approximately $215 million. In the first six months of 2014, dividends paid to Chubb by the property and casualty subsidiaries increased by $457 million compared with the comparable period of 2013 reflecting in part a difference in the timing of the payment of subsidiary dividends in 2013 and those paid and anticipated in 2014. During the first six months of 2013, the cash provided by the operating activities of the property and casualty subsidiaries exceeded the cash used for financing activities by the property and casualty subsidiaries (primarily the payment of dividends to Chubb) by approximately $70 million.

---

Table of Contents

 

Page 49

Our property and casualty subsidiaries maintain substantial investments in highly liquid, short term marketable securities. Accordingly, we do not anticipate selling long term fixed maturity investments to meet any liquidity needs.

Chubb’s liquidity requirements primarily include the payment of dividends to shareholders and interest and principal on debt obligations. The declaration and payment of future dividends to Chubb’s shareholders will be at the discretion of Chubb’s Board of Directors and will depend upon many factors, including our operating results, financial condition, capital requirements and any regulatory constraints.

As a holding company, Chubb’s ability to continue to pay dividends to shareholders and to satisfy its debt obligations relies on the availability of liquid assets, which is dependent in large part on the dividend paying ability of its property and casualty subsidiaries. The timing and amount of dividends paid by the property and casualty subsidiaries to Chubb may vary from year to year. In the United States, our property and casualty subsidiaries are subject to laws and regulations in the jurisdictions in which they operate that restrict the amount and timing of dividends they may pay within twelve consecutive months without the prior approval of regulatory authorities. The restrictions are generally based on net income and on certain levels of policyholders’ surplus as determined in accordance with statutory accounting practices. Dividends in excess of such thresholds are considered “extraordinary” and require prior regulatory approval.

During the first six months of 2014, the property and casualty subsidiaries paid dividends of $1,091 million to Chubb. Whether any dividends the property and casualty subsidiaries may pay during the remainder of 2014 require regulatory approval will depend on the amount and timing of the dividend payments. As of June 30, 2014, the maximum aggregate dividend distribution that may be made by the subsidiaries to Chubb during the remainder of 2014 without prior regulatory approval was approximately $930 million.

Invested Assets

The main objectives in managing our investment portfolios are to maximize after-tax investment income and total investment return while managing credit risk and interest rate risk in order to ensure that funds will be available to meet our insurance obligations. Investment strategies are developed based on many factors including underwriting results and our resulting tax position, regulatory requirements, fluctuations in interest rates and consideration of other market risks. Investment decisions are centrally managed by investment professionals based on guidelines established by management and approved by the boards of directors of Chubb and its respective operating companies.

Our investment portfolio primarily comprises high quality bonds, principally tax exempt securities, corporate bonds, mortgage-backed securities and U.S. Treasury securities, as well as foreign government and corporate bonds that support our operations outside the United States. The portfolio also includes equity securities, primarily publicly traded common stocks, and other invested assets, primarily private equity limited partnerships, all of which are held with the primary objective of capital appreciation.

---

Table of Contents

 

Page 50

Our objective is to achieve an appropriate mix of taxable and tax exempt securities in our portfolio to balance both investment and tax strategies. At June 30, 2014, 63% of our U.S. fixed maturity portfolio was invested in tax exempt securities. At June 30, 2014, about 70% of our tax exempt securities were rated Aa or better, with about 20% rated Aaa. The average rating of our tax exempt securities was Aa. While about 15% of our tax exempt securities were insured, the effect of insurance on the average credit rating of these securities was insignificant. The insured tax exempt securities in our portfolio have been selected based on the quality of the underlying credit and not the value of the credit insurance enhancement.

At June 30, 2014, 7% of our taxable fixed maturity portfolio was invested in U.S. government and government agency and authority obligations other than mortgage-backed securities and had an average rating of Aa. About 70% of the U.S. government and government agency and authority obligations other than mortgage-backed securities were U.S. Treasury securities with an average rating of Aaa and the remainder were taxable bonds issued by states, municipalities and political subdivisions within the United States with an average rating of Aa.

At June 30, 2014, 49% of our taxable fixed maturity portfolio consisted of corporate bonds that were issued by a diverse group of U.S. and foreign issuers and had an average rating of A. About 55% of our corporate bonds were issued by U.S. companies and about 45% were issued by foreign companies. Our foreign corporate bonds included $60 million and $13 million issued by companies, including banks, in Ireland and Spain, respectively. We held no bonds issued by companies in Greece, Italy or Portugal.

At June 30, 2014, 36% of our taxable fixed maturity portfolio was invested in foreign government and government agency obligations, which had an average rating of Aa. The foreign government and government agency obligations consisted of high quality securities, primarily issued by national governments and, to a lesser extent, government agencies, regional governments and supranational organizations. The five largest sovereign issuers within our portfolio were Canada, Germany, the United Kingdom, Australia and Brazil, which collectively accounted for about 75% of our total foreign government and government agency obligations. Another 7% of our total foreign government and government agency obligations were issued by supranational organizations. We held no sovereign securities issued by Portugal, Ireland, Italy, Greece or Spain. We did not hold any foreign government or government agency fixed maturities that have third party guarantees.

At June 30, 2014, 8% of our taxable fixed maturity portfolio was invested in mortgage-backed securities. About 95% of the mortgage-backed securities were rated Aaa. About half of the remaining 5% were below investment grade. Of the Aaa rated securities, 87% were call protected, commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS). All of our CMBS were senior securities with the highest level of credit support. The other 13% of the Aaa rated securities were residential mortgage-backed securities, consisting of government agency pass-through securities guaranteed by a government agency or a government sponsored enterprise and collateralized mortgage obligations backed by single family home mortgages.

---

Table of Contents

 

Page 51

The net unrealized appreciation before tax of our fixed maturities and equity securities carried at fair value was $2.6 billion at June 30, 2014 compared with net unrealized appreciation before tax of $1.9 billion at December 31, 2013. Such unrealized appreciation is reflected in accumulated other comprehensive income, net of applicable deferred income taxes.

During the first six months of 2014, market yields on fixed maturity investments decreased resulting in an increase in the fair value of many of our fixed maturity investments.

Fair Values of Financial Instruments

Fair values of financial instruments are determined by management using valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. Fair values are generally measured using quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities or other inputs, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, that are observable either directly or indirectly. In those instances where observable inputs are not available, fair values are measured using unobservable inputs for the asset or liability. Unobservable inputs reflect our own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability and are developed based on the best information available in the circumstances. Fair value estimates derived from unobservable inputs are affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rates and the estimated amounts and timing of future cash flows. The derived fair value estimates cannot be substantiated by comparison to independent markets and are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that would be realized in a current market exchange.

The fair value hierarchy prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels as follows:

Level 1 – Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical financial instruments.

Level 2 – Other inputs that are observable for the financial instrument, either directly or indirectly.

Level 3 – Significant unobservable inputs.

The methods and assumptions used to estimate the fair values of financial instruments are as follows:

The carrying value of short term investments approximates fair value due to the short maturities of these investments.

---

Table of Contents

 

Page 52

Fair values of fixed maturities are determined by management, utilizing prices obtained from a third party, nationally recognized pricing service or, in the case of securities for which prices are not provided by a pricing service, from third party brokers. For fixed maturities that have quoted prices in active markets, market quotations are provided. For fixed maturities that do not trade on a daily basis, the pricing service and brokers provide fair value estimates using a variety of inputs including, but not limited to, benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes, issuer spreads, bids, offers, reference data, prepayment rates and measures of volatility. Management reviews on an ongoing basis the reasonableness of the methodologies used by the relevant pricing service and brokers. In addition, management, using the prices received for the securities from the pricing service and brokers, determines the aggregate portfolio price performance and reviews it against applicable indices. If management believes that significant discrepancies exist, it will discuss these with the relevant pricing service or broker to resolve the discrepancies.

Fair values of equity securities are determined by management, utilizing quoted market prices.

Fair values of long term debt issued by Chubb are determined by management, utilizing prices obtained from a third party, nationally recognized pricing service.

At June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, a pricing service provided fair value amounts for approximately 99% of our fixed maturities. The prices we obtain from a pricing service and brokers generally are non-binding, but are reflective of current market transactions in the applicable financial instruments.

At June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, we held an insignificant amount of financial instruments in our investment portfolio for which a lack of market liquidity impacted our determination of fair value.

Item 3 — Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

For the Corporation’s disclosures about market risk, see Item 7A in Part II of the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013. There have been no material changes to the Corporation’s disclosures about market risk in Item 7A of the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.

Item 4 — Controls and Procedures

As of June 30, 2014, an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Corporation’s disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) was performed under the supervision and with the participation of the Corporation’s management, including Chubb’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer. Based on that evaluation, the chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that the Corporation’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2014.

During the quarter ended June 30, 2014, there were no changes in internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting.

---

Table of Contents

 

Page 53

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1A — Risk Factors

For a discussion of the Corporation’s potential risks or uncertainties that could have a material effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and/or liquidity or that could cause our operating results to vary significantly from fiscal period to fiscal period, see Item 1A in Part I of the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also could have a material effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and/or liquidity.

Item 2 — Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

The following table summarizes Chubb’s stock repurchased each month in the quarter ended June 30, 2014:

 

		Total Number of Shares Purchased				Average Price Paid Per Share				Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs				Maximum Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs(a)
														(in millions)
Period
April 1-30			118,570			$	91.61				118,570			$	1,187
May 1-31			1,768,154				92.67				1,768,154				1,023
June 1-30			2,144,562				93.26				2,144,562				823
Total			4,031,286				92.95				4,031,286

(a)	On January 30, 2014, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $1.5 billion of Chubb’s common stock. The January 30, 2014 authorization has no expiration date.

---

Table of Contents

 

Page 54

Item 6 — Exhibits

 

Exhibit Number				Description
		-		Material Contracts
10.1*				The Chubb Corporation Long-Term Incentive Plan (2014) incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of the registrant’s registration statement on Form S-8 filed on April 29, 2014. (File No. 333-195560)
10.2*				Form of Deferred Stock Unit Agreement (for Non-Employee Directors) under The Chubb Corporation Long-Term Incentive Plan (2014) filed herewith.
10.3*				Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement under The Chubb Corporation Long-Term Incentive Plan (2014) filed herewith.
		-		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications
31.1				Certification by John D. Finnegan filed herewith.
31.2				Certification by Richard G. Spiro filed herewith.
		-		Section 1350 Certifications
32.1				Certification by John D. Finnegan filed herewith.
32.2				Certification by Richard G. Spiro filed herewith.
		-		Interactive Data File
101.INS				XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH				XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL				XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.LAB				XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE				XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
101.DEF				XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

 

*	This exhibit is a management contract or a compensatory plan or arrangement.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, The Chubb Corporation has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

Date: August 7, 2014