UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended December 31, 2006
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Commission File Number: 333-114552
PROSPECT ENERGY CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Maryland | 43-2048643 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
10 East 40th Street | |
New York, New York | 10016 |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
(212) 448-0702 | |
(Registrants telephone number, including area code) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large Accelerated Filer o Accelerated Filer x Non-Accelerated Filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). o Yes x No
The number of shares of the registrants Common Stock, $0.001 par value, outstanding as of February 9, 2007 was 19,785,388.
2
PART I: FINANCIAL INFORMATION
In this Quarterly Report, the terms we, us, our, Company and Prospect Energy refer to Prospect Energy Corporation; Prospect Management or the Investment Adviser refers to Prospect Capital Management, LLC; Prospect Administration or the Administrator refers to Prospect Administration, LLC.
Item 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
See notes to financial statements.
3
See notes to financial statements.
4
See notes to financial statements.
5
See notes to financial statements.
____________________
(1) Certain amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period's presentation.
6
See notes to financial statements.
7
See notes to financial statements.
8
PROSPECT ENERGY CORPORATION | ||||||||||||||
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS | ||||||||||||||
December 31, 2006 | ||||||||||||||
(in 000s except share amounts) | ||||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||||||||
Portfolio Investments (1) |
Locale/ Industry |
Par Value/ Shares |
Cost |
Fair Value (2) |
% of Net Assets | |||||||||
Affiliate Investments (5.00% to 24.99% of voting control) | ||||||||||||||
Appalachian Energy Holdings LLC (9) | West Virginia/ | |||||||||||||
Construction | ||||||||||||||
Services | ||||||||||||||
Series A preferred shares | 200 | $ | 50 | $ | 50 | 0.0 | % | |||||||
Warrants, expiring 2/14/2016 | 6,065 | 348 | 348 | 0.1 | % | |||||||||
Senior secured note, 14.00%, 3.00% | ||||||||||||||
PIK due 1/31/2011 | $ | 5,015 | 4,768 | 4,768 | 1.7 | % | ||||||||
Total | 5,166 | 5,166 | 1.8 | % | ||||||||||
Genesis Coal Corp. | Kentucky/ | |||||||||||||
Mining and Coal | ||||||||||||||
Production | ||||||||||||||
Common Stock | 6 | | | 0.0 | % | |||||||||
Warrants, preferred shares, expiring | ||||||||||||||
2/9/2016 | 1,000 | 33 | 1 | 0.0 | % | |||||||||
Senior secured note, 16.49% (10) | ||||||||||||||
due 12/31/2010 | $ | 8,736 | 8,592 | 7,809 | 2.7 | % | ||||||||
Total | 8,625 | 7,810 | 2.7 | % | ||||||||||
Iron Horse Coiled Tubing, Inc. | Alberta, Canada/ | |||||||||||||
Production | ||||||||||||||
services | ||||||||||||||
Common shares | 93 | 268 | 268 | 0.1 | % | |||||||||
Senior secured note, 15.00% | ||||||||||||||
due 4/19/2009 | $ | 9,250 | 8,863 | 8,863 | 3.0 | % | ||||||||
Total | 9,131 | 9,131 | 3.1 | % | ||||||||||
Total Affiliate Investments | 22,922 | 22,107 | 7.6 | % | ||||||||||
Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments (less than 5.00% of voting control) | ||||||||||||||
Arctic Acquisition Corp. (11) | Texas/ | |||||||||||||
Production | ||||||||||||||
services | ||||||||||||||
Warrants, common shares, expiring | ||||||||||||||
7/19/2012 | 596,251 | 507 | 507 | 0.2 | % | |||||||||
Warrants, Series A redeemable | ||||||||||||||
preferred shares, expiring 7/19/2012 | 1,054 | 507 | 507 | 0.2 | % |
See notes to financial statements.
9
PROSPECT ENERGY CORPORATION | ||||||||||||||
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS | ||||||||||||||
December 31, 2006 | ||||||||||||||
(in 000s except share amounts) | ||||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||||||||
Portfolio Investments (1) |
Locale/ Industry |
Par Value/ Shares |
Cost |
Fair Value (2) |
|
% of Net Assets | ||||||||
Senior secured note, 13.00% | ||||||||||||||
due 6/15/2009 | $ | 9,348 | $ | 8,515 | $ | 8,515 | 2.9 | % | ||||||
Total | 9,529 | 9,529 | 3.3 | % | ||||||||||
Central Illinois Energy, LLC | Illinois/ | |||||||||||||
Biofuels/ | ||||||||||||||
Ethanol | ||||||||||||||
Senior secured note, 15.36% (12) | ||||||||||||||
due 3/31/2014 | $ | 8,000 | 8,000 | 8,000 | 2.8 | % | ||||||||
Charlevoix Energy Trading, LLC (13) | Michigan/ | |||||||||||||
Natural Gas | ||||||||||||||
Marketing | ||||||||||||||
Senior secured note, 12.50% | ||||||||||||||
due 3/31/2011 | $ | 5,280 | 5,216 | 5,216 | 1.8 | % | ||||||||
Conquest Cherokee, LLC (14) | Tennessee/Oil | |||||||||||||
and Gas | ||||||||||||||
Production | ||||||||||||||
Senior secured note, 13.00% (11) | ||||||||||||||
due 5/5/2009 | $ | 8,500 | 8,349 | 8,349 | 2.9 | % | ||||||||
Cypress Consulting Services, Inc. (13) | Texas/Seismic | |||||||||||||
Services | ||||||||||||||
Senior secured note, 13.00% (16), plus | ||||||||||||||
2.0% PIK due 4/19/2009 | $ | 4,328 | 4,214 | 4,214 | 1.5 | % | ||||||||
Evolution Petroleum Corp. (17) | Texas/Oil and | |||||||||||||
Gas Production | ||||||||||||||
Common shares, unregistered | 139,926 | 20 | 357 | 0.1 | % | |||||||||
Jettco Marine Services LLC (13) | Louisiana/ | |||||||||||||
Shipping | ||||||||||||||
Subordinated secured note, 12.00% (18), | ||||||||||||||
plus 4.0% PIK due 12/31/2011 | $ | 6,538 | 6,411 | 6,411 | 2.2 | % | ||||||||
Miller Petroleum, Inc. | Tennessee/Oil | |||||||||||||
and Gas | ||||||||||||||
Production | ||||||||||||||
Warrants, expiring 5/4/2010 to | ||||||||||||||
12/31/2011 | 1,024,693 | 151 | 42 | 0.0 | % | |||||||||
Stryker Energy, LLC (19) | Ohio/Oil and | |||||||||||||
Gas Production | ||||||||||||||
Subordinated revolving credit facility, | ||||||||||||||
12.33% (20) due 11/30/2011 | $ | 23,000 | 22,682 | 22,682 | 7.8 | % |
See notes to financial statements.
10
PROSPECT ENERGY CORPORATION | ||||||||||||||
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS | ||||||||||||||
December 31, 2006 | ||||||||||||||
(in 000s except share amounts) | ||||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||||||||
Portfolio Investments (1) |
Locale/ Industry |
Par Value/ Shares |
Cost |
Fair Value (2) |
% of Net Assets | |||||||||
TLOGH, L.P. (19) | Texas/Oil and | |||||||||||||
Gas Production | ||||||||||||||
Senior secured note, 13.00%, | ||||||||||||||
Due 10/23/2009 | $ | 15,500 | $ | 15,280 | $ | 15,280 | 5.3 | % | ||||||
Unity Virginia Holdings, LLC | Virginia/ Mining | |||||||||||||
and Coal | ||||||||||||||
Production | ||||||||||||||
Subordinated secured note, 15.00%, | ||||||||||||||
15.00% PIK due 1/31/2009 | $ | 3,580 | 3,825 | 500 | 0.2 | % | ||||||||
Total Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments | 83,677 | 80,580 | 27.9 | % | ||||||||||
Total Portfolio Investments | 193,255 | 200,820 | 69.4 | % | ||||||||||
Money Market Funds | ||||||||||||||
Fidelity Institutional Money Market Funds - | ||||||||||||||
Government Portfolio (Class I) | 93,052,736 | 93,053 | 93,053 | 32.2 | % | |||||||||
First American Funds, Inc. - Prime | ||||||||||||||
Obligations Fund (Class Y) | 194,227 | 194 | 194 | 0.1 | % | |||||||||
Total Money Market Funds | 93,247 | 93,247 | 32.3 | % | ||||||||||
Total Investments | $ | 286,502 | $ | 294,067 | 101.7 | % |
(1) | The securities in which Prospect Energy has invested were acquired in transactions that were exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act. These securities may be resold only in transactions that are exempt from registration under the Securities Act. | |
(2) | Fair value is determined by or under the direction of the board of directors of Prospect Energy (Note 2). | |
(3) | Prospect Energy has the right to purchase 184 shares of Class A common shares at a purchase price of $1.00 per share in the event of a default under the credit agreement. | |
(4) | Gas Solutions Holdings, Inc. and NRG Manufacturing, Inc. are wholly-owned investments of Prospect Energy. | |
(5) | Interest rate is the greater of 16.5% or 12-Month LIBOR plus 11.0%; rate reflected is as of December 31, 2006. | |
(6) | There are several entities involved in the Whymore investment. The senior secured debt is with C&A Construction, Inc. (C&A), which owns the equipment. E&L Construction, Inc. (E&L) leases the equipment from C&A, employs the workers, is listed as the operator with the Commonwealth of Kentucky, mines the coal, receives revenues and pays all operating expenses. Whymore Coal Company, Inc. (Whymore) applies for and holds permits on behalf of E&L. Whymore and E&L are guarantors under the C&A credit agreement with Prospect Energy. Prospect Energy owns 10,000 shares of common stock of C&A (100% ownership), 10,000 shares of common stock of E&L (100% ownership), and 4,900 shares of common stock of Whymore (49% ownership). Prospect Energy owns 4,285 Series A convertible preferred shares in each of C&A, E&L and Whymore. Additionally, Prospect Energy retains an option to purchase the remaining 51% of Whymore. As of December 31, 2006, the Board of Directors of Prospect Energy assessed a fair value of $0 for all of these equity positions. |
See notes to financial statements.
11
(7) | Interest rate is the greater of 15.0% or 5-Year US Treasury Note plus 11.5%; rate reflected is as of December 31, 2006. | |
(8) | There are several entities involved in the Worcester investment. Prospect Energy owns 100 shares of common stock in Worcester Energy Holdings, Inc. (WEHI) representing 100%. WEHI, in turn, owns 51 membership certificates in Biochips LLC, which represents 51% ownership. Prospect Energy also owns 282 shares of common stock in Worcester Energy Co., Inc. (WECO), which represents 51% ownership. Prospect Energy also owns 1,665 shares of common stock in Worcester Energy Partners, Inc. (WEPI), which represents 51% ownership. Prospect Energy also owns 1,000 of series A convertible preferred shares in WEPI. WECO, WEPI and Biochips LLC are joint borrowers on the term note issued by Prospect Energy. WEPI owns the equipment and operates the biomass generation facility. Biochips LLC currently has no material operations. | |
(9) | There are several entities involved in the Appalachian Energy Holdings (Appalachian Energy) investment. Prospect Energy owns 100 shares of Class A common stock of AEH Investment Corp. (AEH), 200 shares of Series A preferred stock of AEH and 6,065 warrants, expiring 2/14/2016 to purchase Class A common stock. The senior secured note is with C & S Operating LLC and East Cumberland L. L. C., both operating companies owned by Appalachian Energy Holdings LLC. AEH owns Appalachian Energy. | |
(10) | Interest rate is the greater of 15.0% or 6-Month LIBOR plus 11.0%; rate reflected is as of December 31, 2006. | |
(11) | The Portfolio Investment does business as Cougar Pressure Control. | |
(12) | Interest rate is LIBOR plus 10.0%; rate reflected is as of December 31, 2006. | |
(13) | Prospect Energy has a net profits interest in the Portfolio Investment. | |
(14) | Prospect Energy has an overriding royalty interest and net profits interest in the Portfolio Investment. | |
(15) | Interest rate is the greater of 13.0% or 12-Month LIBOR plus 7.5%; rate reflected is as of December 31, 2006. | |
(16) | Interest rate is the greater of 13.0% or 12-Month LIBOR plus 7.0%; rate reflected is as of December 31, 2006. | |
(17) | Formerly known as Natural Gas Systems, Inc. | |
(18) | Interest rate is the greater of 12.0% or 3-Month LIBOR plus 6.11%; rate reflected is as of December 31, 2006. | |
(19) | Prospect Energy has an overriding royalty interest in Portfolio Investment. | |
(20) | Interest rate is the greater of 12.0% or 12-Month LIBOR plus 7.0%; rate reflected is as of December 31, 2006. |
See notes to financial statements.
12
See notes to financial statements.
13
PROSPECT ENERGY CORPORATION
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
June 30, 2006
(in 000s except share amounts)
Portfolio Investments (1) |
|
Locale/ Industry |
Par Value/ Shares |
|
Cost |
|
Fair Value (2) |
|
% of Net Assets |
|||||
Iron Horse Coiled Tubing, Inc. | Alberta, Canada/ | |||||||||||||
Production | ||||||||||||||
services | ||||||||||||||
Common shares | 93 | $ | 268 | $ | 268 | 0.2 | % | |||||||
Senior secured note, 15.00% | ||||||||||||||
due 4/19/2009 | $ | 6,250 | 5,819 | 5,819 | 5.4 | % | ||||||||
Total | 6,087 | 6,087 | 5.6 | % | ||||||||||
Total Affiliate Investments | 25,329 | 25,329 | 23.3 | % | ||||||||||
Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments (less than 5.00% of voting control) | ||||||||||||||
Arctic Acquisition Corp. | Texas/ | |||||||||||||
Production | ||||||||||||||
services | ||||||||||||||
Warrants, common shares, expiring | ||||||||||||||
7/19/2012 | 596,251 | 507 | 507 | 0.5 | % | |||||||||
Warrants, Series A redeemable | ||||||||||||||
preferred shares, expiring 7/19/2012 | 1,054 | 507 | 507 | 0.5 | % | |||||||||
Senior secured note, 13.00% | ||||||||||||||
due 6/15/2009 | $ | 9,099 | 8,082 | 8,082 | 7.5 | % | ||||||||
Total | 9,096 | 9,096 | 8.5 | % | ||||||||||
Central Illinois Energy, LLC | Illinois/ | |||||||||||||
Biofuels/ | ||||||||||||||
Ethanol | ||||||||||||||
Senior secured note, 15.50% (7) | ||||||||||||||
due 3/31/2014 | $ | 8,000 | 8,000 | 8,000 | 7.4 | % | ||||||||
Charlevoix Energy Trading, LLC | Michigan/ | |||||||||||||
Natural Gas | ||||||||||||||
Marketing | ||||||||||||||
Senior secured note, 12.50% | ||||||||||||||
due 3/31/2011 | $ | 5,500 | 5,422 | 5,422 | 5.0 | % | ||||||||
Conquest Cherokee, LLC | Tennessee/Oil | |||||||||||||
and Gas | ||||||||||||||
Production | ||||||||||||||
Senior secured note, 13.24% (8) | ||||||||||||||
due 5/5/2009 | $ | 3,500 | 3,434 | 3,434 | 3.2 | % |
See notes to financial statements.
14
PROSPECT ENERGY CORPORATION
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
June 30, 2006
(in 000s except share amounts)
Portfolio Investments (1) |
Locale/ Industry |
Par Value/ Shares |
Cost |
Fair Value (2) |
% of Net Assets |
|||||||||
Genesis Coal Corp. | Kentucky/ | |||||||||||||
Mining and Coal | ||||||||||||||
Production | ||||||||||||||
Warrants, preferred shares, expiring |
|
|
||||||||||||
2/9/2016 | 1,000 |
$ |
33 |
$ |
33 | 0.0 | % | |||||||
Senior secured note, 15.89% (9) | ||||||||||||||
due 12/31/2010 | $ | 6,925 | 6,734 |
|
6,734 | 6.2 | % | |||||||
Total | 6,767 | 6,767 | 6.2 | % | ||||||||||
Miller Petroleum, Inc. | Tennessee/Oil | |||||||||||||
and Gas | ||||||||||||||
Production | ||||||||||||||
Warrants, expiring 5/4/2010 through | ||||||||||||||
6/30/2011 | 842,527 | 150 | 150 | 0.1 | % | |||||||||
Natural Gas Systems, Inc. | Texas/Oil and | |||||||||||||
Gas Production | ||||||||||||||
Common shares, registered | 732,528 | 164 | 2,124 | 2.0 | % | |||||||||
Common shares, unregistered | 139,926 | 20 | 345 | 0.3 | % | |||||||||
Total | 184 | 2,469 | 2.3 | % | ||||||||||
Stryker Energy II, LLC (10) | Ohio/Oil and | |||||||||||||
Gas Production | ||||||||||||||
Preferred stock | 350 | 1,470 | 1,470 | 1.4 | % | |||||||||
Senior secured note, 13.32% | ||||||||||||||
due 4/8/2010 | $ | 13,330 | 13,139 | 13,138 | 12.1 | % | ||||||||
Total | 14,609 | 14,608 | 13.5 | % | ||||||||||
Unity Virginia Holdings, LLC | Virginia/ Mining | |||||||||||||
and Coal | ||||||||||||||
Production | ||||||||||||||
Subordinated secured note, 15.00%, | ||||||||||||||
15.00% PIK due 1/31/2009 | $ | 3,580 | 3,529 | 2,754 | 2.5 | % |
See notes to financial statements.
15
PROSPECT ENERGY CORPORATION
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
June 30, 2006
(in 000s except share amounts)
Portfolio Investments (1) |
|
Locale/ Industry |
Par Value/ Shares |
|
Cost |
|
Fair Value (2) |
|
% of Net Assets |
| ||||
Whymore Coal Company, Inc. (11) | Kentucky/ | |||||||||||||
Mining and Coal | ||||||||||||||
Production | ||||||||||||||
Preferred shares, convertible, Series A | 4,285 | $ | | $ | 1 | 0.0 | % | |||||||
Senior secured note, 16.59% (12) | ||||||||||||||
due 12/31/2010 | $ | 7,425 | 7,314 | 6,354 | 5.9 | % | ||||||||
Total | 7,314 | 6,355 | 5.9 | % | ||||||||||
Total Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments | 58,505 | 59,055 | 54.6 | % | ||||||||||
Total Portfolio Investments | 123,593 | 133,969 | 123.7 | % | ||||||||||
Money Market Fund | ||||||||||||||
First American Funds, Inc. - Prime | ||||||||||||||
Obligations Fund (Class Y) | 1,607,893 | $ | 1,608 | $ | 1,608 | 1.5 | % | |||||||
Total Investments | $ | 125,201 | $ | 135,577 | 125.2 | % |
(1) | The securities in which Prospect Energy has invested were acquired in transactions that were exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act. These securities may be resold only in transactions that are exempt from registration under the Securities Act. | |
(2) | Fair value is determined by or under the direction of the board of directors of Prospect Energy (Note 2). | |
(3) | Gas Solutions Holdings Inc. is a wholly owned investment of Prospect Energy. | |
(4) | There are several entities involved in the Worcester investment. Prospect Energy owns 100 shares of common stock in Worcester Energy Holdings, Inc. (WEHI) representing 100%. WEHI, in turn, owns 51 membership certificates in Biochips LLC, which represents 51% ownership. Prospect Energy also owns 282 shares of common stock in Worcester Energy Co., Inc. (WECO), which represents 51% ownership. Prospect Energy also owns 1,665 shares of common stock in Worcester Energy Partners, Inc. (WEPI), which represents 51% ownership. Prospect Energy also owns 1,000 of series A convertible preferred shares in WEPI. WECO, WEPI and Biochips LLC are joint borrowers on the term note issued by Prospect Energy. WEPI owns the equipment and operates the biomass generation facility. Biochips LLC currently has no material operations. | |
(5) | Prospect Energy has the right to purchase 184 shares of Class A common shares at a purchase price of $1.00 per share in the event of a default under the credit agreement. | |
(6) | There are several entities involved in the Appalachian Energy Holdings (Appalachian Energy) investment. Prospect Energy owns 100 shares of Class A common stock of AEH Investment Corp. (AEH), 200 shares of Series A preferred stock of AEH and 6,065 warrants, expiring 2/14/2016 to purchase Class A common stock. The senior secured note is with C & S Operating LLC and East Cumberland L.L.C., both operating companies owned by Appalachian Energy Holdings LLC. AEH owns Appalachian Energy. | |
(7) | Interest rate is LIBOR plus 10.0%; rate reflected is as of June 30, 2006. | |
(8) | Interest rate is the greater of 13.0% or 12-Month LIBOR plus 7.5%; rate reflected is as of June 30, 2006. | |
(9) | Interest rate is the greater of 15.0% or 6-Month LIBOR plus 11.0%; rate reflected is as of June 30, 2006. | |
(10) | Prospect Energy owns 100 shares of common stock in PEH Stryker, Inc. (PEH Stryker), which represents 100%. PEH Stryker holds 350 non-voting Class A preferred units in Stryker Energy II, LLC (Stryker II), which represents a 35% interest. Stryker II is the borrower on the term note issued by Prospect Energy. Prospect Energy also holds one warrant expiring 4/18/2025 for anti-dilution purposes. | |
(11) | There are several entities involved in the Whymore investment. The senior secured debt is with C&A Construction, Inc. (C&A), which owns the equipment. E&L Construction, Inc. (E&L) leases the equipment from C&A, employs the workers, is listed as the operator with the Commonwealth of Kentucky, mines the coal, receives revenues and pays all opertaing expenses. Whymore Coal Company, Inc. (Whymore) applies for and holds permits on behalf of E&L. Whymore and E&L are guarantors under the C&A credit agreement with Prospect Energy. Prospect Energy owns 4,285 Series A convertible preferred shares in each of C&A, E&L and Whymore. | |
(12) | Interest rate is the greater of 15.0% or 5-Year US Treasury Note plus 11.5%; rate reflected is as of June 30, 2006. |
See notes to financial statements.
16
PROSPECT ENERGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands except share and per share amounts)
(unaudited)
Note 1. Organization
Prospect Energy Corporation (Prospect Energy or the Company), a Maryland corporation, was organized on April 13, 2004 and is a closed-end investment company that has filed an election to be treated as a business development company under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the 1940 Act). On July 27, 2004, the Company completed its initial public offering (IPO) and sold 7,000,000 shares of common stock at a price of $15.00 per share, less underwriting discounts and commissions totaling $1.05 per share. Since the IPO, the Company has had an exercise of an over-allotment option with respect to the IPO on August 27, 2004, a public offering on August 10, 2006, and subsequent exercise of an over-allotment option on August 28, 2006. On December 13, 2006, the Company priced a public offering of 6,000,000 shares of common stock at $17.70 per share, raising $106,200 in gross proceeds as well as an additional 815,000 shares of common stock at $17.70 per share raising $14,426 in gross proceeds in the exercise of an over-allotment option on January 11, 2007. The Company expects to use the net proceeds of its recent equity offering to fund investments in portfolio companies and for general corporate purposes.
Prospect Energy focuses primarily on investments in energy companies and will invest, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of its net assets (including the amount of any borrowings for investment purposes) in these companies. Prospect Energy concentrates on making investments in energy companies having annual revenues of less than $250,000 and in transaction sizes of less than $30,000. In most cases, these companies are privately held or have thinly traded public equity securities. From time to time, the Company will not hold at least 80% of its net assets in energy companies, especially immediately following a public offering of shares of its common stock.
Note 2. Significant Accounting Policies
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reported period. Changes in the economic environment, financial markets, creditworthiness of our portfolio companies and any other parameters used in determining these estimates could cause actual results to differ.
The statements include portfolio investments at fair value of $200,820 and $133,969 at December 31, 2006 and June 30, 2006, respectively. At December 31, 2006 and June 30, 2006, 69.4% and 123.7%, respectively, of the Companys net assets represented portfolio investments whose fair values have been determined by the board of directors in good faith in the absence of readily available market values. Because of the inherent uncertainty of valuation, the board of directors determined values may differ significantly from the values that would have been used had a ready market existed for the investments, and the differences could be material.
Interim financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP for interim financial information and pursuant to the requirements for reporting on Form 10-Q and Article 6 or 10 of Regulation S-X, as appropriate.
17
The following are significant accounting policies consistently applied by Prospect Energy:
Investments:
a) Security transactions are recorded on a trade-date basis.
b) Valuation:
1) Investments for which market quotations are readily available are valued at such market quotations.
2) Short-term investments that mature in 60 days or less, such as United States Treasury Bills, are valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value. The amortized cost method involves valuing a security at its cost on the date of purchase and thereafter assuming a constant amortization to maturity of the difference between the principal amount due at maturity and cost. Short-term securities that mature in more than 60 days are valued at current market quotations by an independent pricing service or at the mean between the bid and ask prices obtained from at least two brokers or dealers (if available, or otherwise by a principal market maker or a primary market dealer). Investments in money market mutual funds are valued at their net asset value as of the close of business on the day of valuation.
3) It is expected that most of the investments in the Companys portfolio will not have readily available market values. Debt and equity securities whose market prices are not readily available are valued at fair value, with the assistance of an independent valuation service, using a documented valuation policy and a consistently applied valuation process that is under the direction of our board of directors. The factors that may be taken into account in fairly valuing investments include, as relevant, the portfolio companys ability to make payments, its estimated earnings and projected discounted cash flows, the nature and realizable value of any collateral, the sensitivity of the investments to fluctuations in interest rates, the financial environment in which the portfolio company operates, comparisons to securities of similar publicly traded companies and other relevant factors. Due to the inherent uncertainty of determining the fair value of investments that do not have a readily available market value, the fair value of these investments may differ significantly from the values that would have been used had a ready market existed for such investments, and any such differences could be material.
4) The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) has recently issued a new pronouncement addressing fair value measurements, Statement of Financial Accounting Standards Number 157, Fair Value Measurements (FAS 157). This statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. FAS 157 does not become effective until November 2007 and is not expected to have a material effect on the financial statements.
c) Realized gains or losses on the sale of investments are calculated using the specific identification method.
d) Interest income, adjusted for amortization of premium and accretion of discount, is recorded on an accrual basis. Origination, closing and/or commitment fees associated with investments in portfolio companies are accreted into interest income over the respective terms of the applicable loans. Upon the prepayment of a loan or debt security, any prepayment penalties and unamortized loan origination, closing and commitment fees are recorded as interest income.
e) Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date.
f) Loans are placed on non-accrual status when principal or interest payments are past due 90 days or more or when there is reasonable doubt that principal or interest will be collected. Accrued interest is generally reversed when a loan is placed on non-accrual status. Interest payments received on non-accrual loans may be recognized as income or applied to principal depending upon managements judgment. Non-accrual loans are restored to accrual status when past due principal and interest is paid and in managements judgment, are likely to remain current. As of December 31, 2006, 0.2% of the Companys net assets is in non-accrual status.
18
Federal and State Income Taxes:
Prospect Energy has elected to be treated as a regulated investment company and intends to continue to comply with the requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the Code), applicable to regulated investment companies. We are required to distribute at least 90% of our investment company taxable income and intend to distribute (or retain through a deemed distribution) all of our investment company taxable income and net capital gain to stockholders; therefore, we have made no provision for income taxes. The character of income and gains that we will distribute is determined in accordance with income tax regulations that may differ from GAAP. Book and tax basis differences relating to stockholder dividends and distributions and other permanent book and tax differences are reclassified to paid-in capital.
If the Company does not distribute (or is not deemed to have distributed) at least 98% of its annual taxable income in the year earned, the Company will generally be required to pay an excise tax equal to 4% of the amount by which 98% of the Companys annual taxable income exceeds the distributions from such taxable income for the year. To the extent that the Company determines that its estimated current year annual taxable income will be in excess of estimated current year dividend distributions from such taxable income, the Company accrues excise taxes, if any, on estimated excess taxable income as taxable income is earned using an annual effective excise tax rate. The annual effective excise tax rate is determined by dividing the estimated annual excise tax by the estimated annual taxable income.
Dividends and Distributions:
Dividends and distributions to common stockholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. The amount, if any, to be paid as a dividend is approved by the board of directors each quarter and is generally based upon managements estimate of our earnings for the quarter. Net realized capital gains, if any, are distributed at least annually.
Consolidation:
As an investment company, Prospect Energy only consolidates subsidiaries that are also investment companies. At December 31, 2006 Prospect Energy did not have any consolidated subsidiaries.
Financing Costs:
The Company records origination expenses related to its credit facility as prepaid assets. These expenses are deferred and amortized as part of interest expense using the straight-line method over the stated life of the facility.
The Company records registration expenses related to Shelf filings as prepaid assets. These expenses are charged as a reduction of capital upon utilization, in accordance with Section 8.24 of the AICPA Audit and Accounting Guide for Investment Companies.
Guarantees and Indemnification Agreements:
The Company follows FASB Interpretation Number 45, Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others. (FIN 45). FIN 45 elaborates on the disclosure requirements of a guarantor in its interim and annual financial statements about its obligations under certain guarantees that it has issued. It also requires a guarantor to recognize, at the inception of a guarantee, for those guarantees that are covered by FIN 45, a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing certain guarantees. FIN 45 did not have a material effect on the financial statements. Refer to Note 3 for further discussion of guarantees and indemnification agreements.
Per Share Information:
Basic earnings per common share is calculated using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period presented.
19
Note 3. Portfolio Investments
At December 31, 2006, approximately 69.4% of our net assets or about $200,820 was invested in nineteen long-term portfolio investments and 32.3% of our net assets was invested in money market funds. The remainder (1.7%) of our net assets represented liabilities in excess of other assets. Prospect Energy is a non-diversified company within the meaning of the 1940 Act. We classify our investments by level of control. As defined in the 1940 Act, control investments are those where there is the ability or power to exercise a controlling influence over the management or policies of a company. Control is generally deemed to exist when a company or individual owns more than 25% or more of the voting securities of an investee company. Affiliated investments and affiliated companies are defined by a lesser degree of influence and are deemed to exist through ownership of 5% or more of the outstanding voting securities of another person. The Company owns a controlling interest in Advantage Oilfield Group, Ltd. (AOG), Gas Solutions Holdings, Inc. (GSHI), NRG Manufacturing, Inc. (NRG), Worcester Energy Company, Inc. (WECO) and Whymore Coal Company (Whymore). The Company also owns an affiliated interest in Appalachian Energy Holdings, LLC (AEH), Genesis Coal Corp. (Genesis) and Iron Horse Coiled Tubing, Inc. (Iron Horse). The Company has no other controlled or affiliated investments.
GSHI has indemnified Prospect Energy against any legal action arising from its investment in Gas Solutions, LP. Prospect Energy has incurred approximately $1,738 in fees associated with a legal action through December 31, 2006, and GSHI has reimbursed Prospect Energy the entire amount. Of the $1.738 reimbursement, $19 and $139 is reflected as Dividend income, Controlled entities on the accompanying statement of operations for the three months ended December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively, and $396 and $333 for the six months ended December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively,
Debt placements and interests in non-voting equity securities with an original cost basis of approximately $62,574 and $87,147 were acquired during the three and six months ended December 31, 2006, respectively. Debt repayments and sales of equity securities with an original cost basis of approximately $17,689 and $18,417 were disposed during the three and six months ended December 31, 2006, respectively.
During the last few months, coal prices have softened in Central Appalachia due to mild weather and utility inventory builds, with marginal spot prices for coal falling at times below operating costs for many of the coal producers in that region, including Whymore, Genesis and Unity Virginia Holdings LLC. These recent developments have increased the risks associated with these investments and the risks of loss of capital, though cost cutting and revenue enhancing efforts have intensified, and recent colder weather and market production cuts may improve the pricing situation. We are looking at opportunities to take advantage of the current depressed pricing environment through acquisitions at favorable prices.
From time to time, the Company provides guarantees for portfolio companies for payments to counterparties, usually as an alternative to investing additional capital. Currently, guarantees are outstanding only for two portfolio companies categorized as Control Investments, which are not deemed by management to be material individually or in the aggregate.
Note 4. Organizational and Offering Expenses
A portion of the net proceeds of our initial public offering and the subsequent exercise of the over-allotment option was used for organizational and offering expenses of approximately $125 and $1,386, respectively. Organizational expenses were expensed as incurred. Offering expenses were charged against paid-in capital in excess of par. All organizational and offering expenses were borne by Prospect Energy.
A portion of the net proceeds of our August secondary offering and the subsequent exercise of the over-allotment option was used for offering expenses of approximately $594. A portion of the net proceeds of our December secondary offering and the subsequent exercise of the over-allotment option in January 2007 was used for offering expenses of approximately $563. Offering expenses were charged against paid-in capital in excess of par. All offering expenses were borne by Prospect Energy.
20
Note 5. Related Party Agreements and Transactions
Investment Advisory Agreement
Prospect Energy has entered into an investment advisory and management agreement with Prospect Management (the Investment Advisory Agreement) under which the Investment Adviser, subject to the overall supervision of Prospect Energys board of directors, manages the day-to-day operations of, and provides investment advisory services to, Prospect Energy. Under the terms of the Investment Advisory Agreement, our Investment Adviser: (i) determines the composition of our portfolio, the nature and timing of the changes to our portfolio and the manner of implementing such changes, (ii) identifies, evaluates and negotiates the structure of the investments we make (including performing due diligence on our prospective portfolio companies); and (iii) closes and monitors investments we make.
Prospect Managements services under the Investment Advisory Agreement are not exclusive, and it is free to furnish similar services to other entities so long as its services to us are not impaired. For providing these services the Investment Adviser receives a fee from Prospect Energy, consisting of two components--a base management fee and an incentive fee. The base management fee is calculated at an annual rate of 2.00% on Prospect Energys gross assets (including amounts borrowed). For services rendered under the Investment Advisory Agreement during the period commencing from the closing of Prospect Energys initial public offering through and including the first six months of operations, the base management fee was payable monthly in arrears. For services currently rendered under the Investment Advisory Agreement, the base management fee is payable quarterly in arrears. The base management fee is calculated based on the average value of Prospect Energys gross assets at the end of the two most recently completed calendar quarters (the closing of Prospect Energys initial public offering was treated as a quarter end for these purposes) and appropriately adjusted for any share issuances or repurchases during the current calendar quarter. Base management fees for any partial month or quarter are appropriately pro rated. The total base management fees earned by and paid to Prospect Management during the three months ended December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005 were $1,568 and $524, respectively, and during the six months ended December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005 were $2,184 and $1,034, respectively.
The incentive fee has two parts. The first part, the income incentive fee, is calculated and payable quarterly in arrears based on Prospect Energys pre-incentive fee net investment income for the immediately preceding calendar quarter. For this purpose, pre-incentive fee net investment income means interest income, dividend income and any other income (including any other fees (other than fees for providing managerial assistance), such as commitment, origination, structuring, diligence and consulting fees and other fees that Prospect Energy receives from portfolio companies) accrued during the calendar quarter, minus Prospect Energys operating expenses for the quarter (including the base management fee, expenses payable under the Administration Agreement described below, and any interest expense and dividends paid on any issued and outstanding preferred stock, but excluding the incentive fee). Pre-incentive fee net investment income includes, in the case of investments with a deferred interest feature (such as original issue discount, debt instruments with payment in kind interest and zero coupon securities), accrued income that we have not yet received in cash. Pre-incentive fee net investment income does not include any realized capital gains, realized capital losses or unrealized capital appreciation or depreciation. Pre-incentive fee net investment income, expressed as a rate of return on the value of Prospect Energys net assets at the end of the immediately preceding calendar quarter, is compared to a hurdle rate of 1.75% per quarter (7.00% annualized). Previously, our Investment Adviser had voluntarily agreed that for each fiscal quarter from January 1, 2005 to March 31, 2007, the quarterly hurdle rate will be equal to the greater of (a) 1.75% and (b) a percentage equal to the sum of 25.0% of the daily average of the quoted treasury rate for each month in the immediately preceding two quarters plus 0.50%. Quoted treasury rate means the yield to maturity (calculated on a semi-annual bond equivalent basis) at the time of computation for Five Year U.S. Treasury notes with a constant maturity (as compiled and published in the most recent Federal Reserve Statistical Release H). These calculations will be appropriately pro rated for any period of less than three months and adjusted for any share issuances or repurchases during the current quarter. The voluntary agreement by the Investment Adviser that the hurdle rate be fluctuating for each fiscal quarter after January 1, 2005 (as discussed above) has been terminated by the Investment Adviser for the June 30, 2007, quarter and beyond.
21
The net investment income used to calculate this part of the incentive fee is also included in the amount of the gross assets used to calculate the 2.00% base management fee. Prospect Energy pays the Investment Adviser an income incentive fee with respect to Prospect Energys pre-incentive fee net investment income in each calendar quarter as follows:
These calculations are appropriately pro rated for any period of less than three months and adjusted for any share issuances or repurchases during the current quarter.
The second part of the incentive fee, the capital gains incentive fee, is determined and payable in arrears as of the end of each calendar year (or upon termination of the Investment Advisory Agreement, as of the termination date), and equals 20.00% of Prospect Energys realized capital gains for the calendar year, if any, computed net of all realized capital losses and unrealized capital depreciation at the end of such year. In determining the capital gains incentive fee payable to the Investment Adviser, Prospect Energy calculates the aggregate realized capital gains, aggregate realized capital losses and aggregate unrealized capital depreciation, as applicable, with respect to each of the investments in its portfolio. For this purpose, aggregate realized capital gains, if any, equals the sum of the differences between the net sales price of each investment, when sold, and the original cost of such investment since inception. Aggregate realized capital losses equal the sum of the amounts by which the net sales price of each investment, when sold, is less than the original cost of such investment since inception. Aggregate unrealized capital depreciation equals the sum of the difference, if negative, between the valuation of each investment as of the applicable date and the original cost of such investment. At the end of the applicable period, the amount of capital gains that serves as the basis for Prospect Energys calculation of the capital gains incentive fee equals the aggregate realized capital gains less aggregate realized capital losses and less aggregate unrealized capital depreciation with respect to its portfolio of investments. If this number is positive at the end of such period, then the capital gains incentive fee for such period is equal to 20.00% of such amount, less the aggregate amount of any capital gains incentive fees paid in respect of its portfolio in all prior periods.
$1,123 and $508 income incentive fees were earned for the three months ended December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively, and $1,941 and $508 income incentive fees were earned for the six months ended December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively. No capital gains incentive fees were earned were earned for the three or six months ended December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005.
Administration Agreement
Prospect Energy has also entered into an Administration Agreement with Prospect Administration, LLC (Prospect Administration) under which Prospect Administration, among other things, provides (or arranges for the provision of) administrative services and facilities for Prospect Energy. For providing these services, Prospect Energy reimburses Prospect Administration for Prospect Energys allocable portion of overhead incurred by Prospect Administration in performing its obligations under the Administration Agreement, including rent and our allocable portion of the costs of our chief compliance officer and chief financial officer and their respective staffs. Under this agreement, Prospect Administration furnishes us with office facilities, equipment and clerical, bookkeeping and record keeping services at such facilities. Prospect Administration also performs, or oversees the performance of, our required administrative services, which include, among other things, being responsible for the financial records that we are required to maintain and preparing reports to our stockholders and reports filed with the SEC. In addition, Prospect Administration assists us in determining and publishing our net asset value, overseeing the preparation and filing of our tax returns and the printing and dissemination of reports to our stockholders, and generally oversees the payment of our expenses and the performance of administrative and professional services rendered to us by others. Under the Administration Agreement, Prospect Administration also provides on our behalf managerial assistance to those portfolio companies to which we are required to provide such assistance. The Administration Agreement may be terminated by either party without penalty upon 60 days written notice to the other party. Prospect Administration is a wholly owned subsidiary of our Investment Adviser.
22
The Administration Agreement provides that, absent willful misfeasance, bad faith or negligence in the performance of its duties or by reason of the reckless disregard of its duties and obligations, Prospect Administration and its officers, managers, partners, agents, employees, controlling persons, members and any other person or entity affiliated with it are entitled to indemnification from Prospect Energy for any damages, liabilities, costs and expenses (including reasonable attorneys fees and amounts reasonably paid in settlement) arising from the rendering of Prospect Administrations services under the Administration Agreement or otherwise as administrator for Prospect Energy.
Prospect Administration, pursuant to the approval of our board of directors, has engaged Vastardis Fund Services LLC (Vastardis) to serve as the sub-administrator of Prospect Energy to perform certain services required of Prospect Administration. This engagement began in May 2005 and ran on a month-to-month basis at the rate of $25 annually, payable monthly. Under the sub-administration agreement, Vastardis provides Prospect Energy with office facilities, equipment, clerical, bookkeeping and record keeping services at such facilities. Vastardis also conducts relations with custodians, depositories, transfer agents, dividend disbursing agents, other stockholder servicing agents, accountants, attorneys, underwriters, brokers and dealers, corporate fiduciaries, insurers, banks and such other persons in any such other capacity deemed to be necessary or desirable. Vastardis provides reports to the Administrator and the Directors of its performance of obligations and furnishes advice and recommendations with respect to such other aspects of the business and affairs of Prospect Energy as it shall determine to be desirable. Under the revised and renewed sub-administration agreement, Vastardis also provides the service of William E. Vastardis as the Chief Financial Officer (CFO) of the Fund. This service was formerly provided at the rate of $225 annually, payable monthly. In May 2006, the engagement was revised and renewed as an asset-based fee with a $400 annual minimum, payable monthly. Vastardis does not provide any advice or recommendation relating to the securities and other assets that Prospect Energy should purchase, retain or sell or any other investment advisory services to Prospect Energy. Vastardis is responsible for the financial and other records that either Prospect Energy (or the Administrator on behalf of Prospect Energy) is required to maintain and prepares reports to stockholders, and reports and other materials filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. In addition, Vastardis assists Prospect Energy in determining and publishing Prospect Energys net asset value, overseeing the preparation and filing of Prospect Energys tax returns, and the printing and dissemination of reports to stockholders of Prospect Energy, and generally overseeing the payment of Prospect Energys expenses and the performance of administrative and professional services rendered to Prospect Energy by others.
Under the sub-administration agreement, Vastardis and its officers, partners, agents, employees, controlling persons, members, and any other person or entity affiliated with Vastardis, are not liable to the Administrator or Prospect Energy for any action taken or omitted to be taken by Vastardis in connection with the performance of any of its duties or obligations or otherwise as sub-administrator for the Administrator on behalf of Prospect Energy. The agreement also provides that, absent willful misfeasance, bad faith or negligence in the performance of Vastardis duties or by reason of the reckless disregard of Vastardis duties and obligations, Vastardis and its officers, partners, agents, employees, controlling persons, members, and any other person or entity affiliated with Vastardis are entitled to indemnification from the Administrator and Prospect Energy. All damages, liabilities, costs and expenses (including reasonable attorneys fees and amounts reasonably paid in settlement) incurred in or by reason of any pending, threatened or completed action, suit, investigation or other proceeding (including an action or suit by or in the right of the Administrator or Prospect Energy or the security holders of Prospect Energy) arising out of or otherwise based upon the performance of any of Vastardis duties or obligations under the agreement or otherwise as sub-administrator for the Administrator on behalf of Prospect Energy.
Managerial Assistance
As a business development company, we offer, and must provide upon request, managerial assistance to certain of our portfolio companies. This assistance could involve, among other things, monitoring the operations of our portfolio companies, participating in board and management meetings, consulting with and advising officers of portfolio companies and providing other organizational and financial guidance. We have received $147 and $199 in managerial assistance for the three and six month periods ended December 31, 2006, respectively. These fees are paid to the Administrator.
23
Note 6. Financial Highlights
Three Months Ended Dec. 31, 2006 (Unaudited) |
Three Months Ended Dec. 31, 2005 (Unaudited) |
Six Months Ended Dec. 31, 2006 (Unaudited) |
Six Months Ended Dec. 31, 2005 (Unaudited) |
||||||||||
Per Share Data (1): | |||||||||||||
Net asset value at beginning of period | $ | 14.86 | $ | 14.60 | $ | 15.31 | $ | 14.59 | |||||
Costs related to the initial public offering | | 0.01 | | 0.01 | |||||||||
Costs related to the secondary public offering | (0.04 | ) | | (0.10 | ) | | |||||||
Net investment income | 0.33 | 0.29 | 0.66 | 0.49 | |||||||||
Realized gain | | | 0.17 | | |||||||||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | (0.11 | ) | 0.07 | (0.24 | ) | 0.08 | |||||||
Net increase in net assets as a result of secondary public offering | 0.59 | | 0.21 | | |||||||||
Dividends declared and paid | (0.39 | ) | (0.28 | ) | (0.77 | ) | (0.48 | ) | |||||
Net asset value at end of period | $ | 15.24 | $ | 14.69 | $ | 15.24 | $ | 14.69 | |||||
Per share market value at end of period | $ | 17.13 | $ | 15.07 | $ | 17.13 | $ | 15.07 | |||||
Total return based on market value (2) | 12.71 | % | 14.98 | % | 5.58 | % | 23.65 | % | |||||
Total return based on net asset value (2) | 4.86 | % | 2.53 | % | 4.24 | % | 4.01 | % | |||||
Shares outstanding at end of period | 18,975,388 | 7,055,100 | 7,055,100 | 7,055,100 | |||||||||
Average weighted shares outstanding for period | 13,588,256 | 7,055,100 | 7,055,100 | 7,055,100 | |||||||||
Ratio / Supplemental Data: | |||||||||||||
Net assets at end of period (in thousands) | $ | 289,238 | $ | 103,653 | $ | 289,238 | $ | 103,653 | |||||
Annualized ratio of operating expenses to average net assets | 7.25 | % | 6.95 | % | 7.15 | % | 6.95 | % | |||||
Annualized ratio of net operating income to average net assets | 8.83 | % | 7.87 | % | 9.44 | % | 7.87 | % |
(1) | Financial highlights are based on weighted average shares. | |
(2) | Total return based on market value is based on the change in market price per share between the opening and ending market prices per share in each period and assumes that dividends are reinvested in accordance with Prospect Energys dividend reinvestment plan. Total return based on net asset value is based upon the change in net asset value per share between the opening and ending net asset values per share in each period and assumes that dividends are reinvested in accordance with Prospect Energys dividend reinvestment plan. The total returns are not annualized. |
Note 7. Litigation
The Company is a defendant in two legal actions arising out of its activities. While predicting the outcome of litigation is inherently very difficult, and the ultimate resolution, range of possible loss and possible impact on operating results cannot be reliably estimated, management believes, based upon its understanding of the facts and the advice of legal counsel, that it has meritorious defenses for both actions. We continue to defend both of these actions vigorously, and believe that resolution of these actions will not have a materially adverse effect on the Companys financial position.
On December 6, 2004, DGP served Prospect Energy with a complaint filed November 30, 2004 in the U.S. District for the Southern District of Texas, Galveston Division. DGP alleges that DGP was defrauded and that Prospect Energy breached its fiduciary duty to DGP and tortiously interfered with DGPs contract to purchase Gas Solutions, Ltd. (a subsidiary of our portfolio company, GSHI) in connection with Prospect Energys alleged agreement in September 2004 to loan DGP funds with which DGP intended to buy Gas Solutions, Ltd. for approximately $26,000. The complaint seeks relief not limited to $100,000. We believe that the DGP complaint is frivolous and without merit, and intend to defend the matter vigorously. On November 30, 2005, U.S. Magistrate Judge John R. Froeschner of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Galveston Division, issued a recommendation that the court grant Prospect Energys Motion for Summary Judgment dismissing all claims by DGP. On February 21, 2006, U.S. District Judge Samuel Kent of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Galveston Division issued an order granting Prospect Energys Motion for Summary Judgment dismissing all claims by Dallas Gas Partners, L.P., against Prospect Energy Corporation. DGP has appealed this decision.
24
On April 7, 2005 a former officer of the Company filed a complaint with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration of the Department of Labor (OSHA) alleging discrimination, retaliation, infliction of emotional distress and other claims. This officer seeks economic reinstatement and other relief. On September 15, 2005, OSHA issued findings, including an order dismissing this complaint. The complainant has filed written objections to the order and had a hearing before an Administrative Law Judge on March 16, 2006. On May 5, 2006, the Administrative Law Judge issued a Decision and Order granting Summary Decision and dismissing the complaint, which the former officer has appealed. The Company does not believe that these claims, even if ultimately resolved against the Company, would be material. The Company believes the complaint is frivolous and without merit and intends to defend itself vigorously.
From time to time, we may become involved in various investigations, claims and legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of our business. These matters may relate to intellectual property, employment, tax, regulation, contract or other matters. The resolution of these matters as they arise will be subject to various uncertainties and, even if such claims are without merit, could result in the expenditure of significant financial and managerial resources.
Note 8. Revolving Credit Agreement
On February 21, 2006, Prospect Energy entered into a $20,000 senior secured revolving credit facility (the Previous Credit Facility) with Bank of Montreal as administrative agent and Harris Nesbitt Corp. as sole lead arranger and sole book runner. The Previous Credit Facility supplemented the Companys equity capital and provided funding for additional portfolio investments. All amounts borrowed under the Previous Credit Facility would have matured, and all accrued and unpaid interest thereunder would have been due and payable within six months of the date of the borrowing. The Previous Credit Facility had a termination date of August 21, 2006. On May 11, 2006, the Previous Credit Facility was increased to $30,000.
On July 26, 2006, we closed a $50,000 revolving credit facility (the Facility) with HSH Nordbank AG as administrative agent and sole lead arranger, replacing the $30,000 Previous Credit Facility. This Facility was used, together with our equity capital, to make additional long-term investments. Interest on borrowings under the Facility is charged, at our option, at either (i) LIBOR plus the applicable spread, ranging from 200 to 250 basis points (the refinanced facility being at 250 basis points over LIBOR), or (ii) the greater of the lender prime rate or the federal funds effective rate plus 50 to 100 basis points. The applicable spread decreases as our equity base increases.
As of December 31, 2006, we had no amounts drawn down on the Facility.
Note 9. Subsequent Event
On January 11, 2007, the underwriters exercised their over-allotment option related to the public offering on December 13, 2006 to purchase 815,000 shares at $17.70 per share, raising an additional $14,426 in gross proceeds. The Company expects to use the net proceeds of its recent equity offering to fund investments in portfolio companies and for general corporate purposes.
25
Note 10. Selected Quarterly Financial Data (unaudited) (in thousands except per share amounts)
Investment Income |
Net Investment Income (Loss) |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gains (Losses) |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets from Operations |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Quarter Ended |
Total |
Per Share* |
Total |
Per Share* |
Total |
Per Share* |
Total |
Per Share* |
||||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, 2004 | $ | 266 | $ | 0.05 | $ | (434 | ) | $ | ( 0.09 | ) | $ | | $ | | $ | (434 | ) | $ | (0.06 | ) | ||||||||||
December 31, 2004 | 2,946 | 0.42 | 1,228 | 0.17 | (2 | ) | | 1,226 | 0.17 | |||||||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2005 | 2,202 | 0.31 | 444 | 0.06 | 414 | 0.06 | 858 | 0.12 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2005 | 2,679 | 0.38 | 1,173 | 0.17 | 5,928 | 0.84 | 7,101 | 1.01 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, 2005 | 3,109 | 0.44 | 1,415 | 0.20 | 58 | 0.01 | 1,473 | 0.21 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2005 | 3,935 | 0.56 | 2,040 | 0.29 | 488 | 0.07 | 2,528 | 0.36 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2006 | 4,026 | 0.57 | 2,126 | 0.30 | 829 | 0.12 | 2,955 | 0.42 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2006 | 5,799 | 0.82 | 2,977 | 0.42 | 2,963 | 0.42 | 5,940 | 0.84 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, 2006 | 6,432 | 0.65 | 3,274 | 0.33 | 690 | 0.07 | 3,964 | 0.40 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2006 | 8,171 | 0.60 | 4,493 | 0.33 | (1,553 | ) | (0.11 | ) | 2,940 | 0.22 |
* | Per share amounts are calculated using weighted average shares during period. |
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
This quarterly report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, as well as assumptions that, if they never materialize or prove incorrect, could cause the results of Prospect Energy Corporation to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. All statements other than statements of historical fact are statements that could be deemed forward-looking statements, including any projections of revenue, expenses, earnings or losses from operations or investments, or other financial items; any statements of the plans, strategies and objectives of management for future operations; any statements of expectation or belief; and any statements of assumptions underlying any of the foregoing. The risks, uncertainties and assumptions referred to above include risks that are described in BusinessFactors That May Affect Future Results and elsewhere in our most recently filed annual report and that are otherwise described from time to time in our Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, reports filed after this report.
The forward-looking statements included in this quarterly report represent our estimates as of the date of this quarterly report. We specifically disclaim any obligation to update these forward-looking statements in the future. Some of the statements in this quarterly report constitute forward-looking statements, which relate to future events or our future performance or financial condition. Such forward-looking statements contained in this quarterly report involve risks and uncertainties.
We use words such as anticipates, believes, expects, future, intends and similar expressions to identify forward-looking statements. Our actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements for any reason, including the factors set forth in Risk Factors in the annual report on Form 10-K and elsewhere in this quarterly report. We caution you that forward-looking statements of this type are subject to uncertainties and risks, many of which cannot be predicted or quantified.
The following analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and the related notes thereto contained elsewhere in this Form 10-Q.
26
Overview
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States or, GAAP, requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reported period. Changes in the economic environment, financial markets and any other parameters used in determining these estimates could cause actual results to differ.
The following are significant accounting policies consistently applied by Prospect Energy:
We believe that the estimates, assumptions and judgments involved in the accounting policies described below have the greatest potential impact on our financial statements. So we consider these to be our critical accounting policies and they are consistently applied by us:
Investments:
a) Security transactions are recorded on a trade-date basis.
b) Valuation:
1) Investments for which market quotations are readily available are valued at such market quotations.
2) Short-term investments which mature in 60 days or less, such as United States Treasury Bills, are valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value. The amortized cost method involves valuing a security at its cost on the date of purchase and thereafter assuming a constant amortization to maturity of the difference between the principal amount due at maturity and cost. Short-term securities which mature in more than 60 days are valued at current market quotations by an independent pricing service or at the mean between the bid and ask prices obtained from at least two brokers or dealers (if available, or otherwise by a principal market maker or a primary market dealer). Investments in money market mutual funds are valued at their net asset value as of the close of business on the day of valuation.
3) It is expected that most of the investments in the Companys portfolio will not have readily available market values. Debt and equity securities whose market prices are not readily available are valued at fair value, with the assistance of an independent valuation service, using a documented valuation policy and a consistently applied valuation process which is under the direction of our board of directors. The factors that may be taken into account in fairly valuing investments include, as relevant, the portfolio companys ability to make payments, its estimated earnings and projected discounted cash flows, the nature and realizable value of any collateral, the sensitivity of the investments to fluctuations in interest rates, the financial environment in which the portfolio company operates, comparisons to securities of similar publicly traded companies and other relevant factors. Due to the inherent uncertainty of determining the fair value of investments that do not have a readily available market value, the fair value of these investments may differ significantly from the values that would have been used had a ready market existed for such investments, and any such differences could be material.
4) The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) has recently issued a new pronouncement addressing fair value measurements, Statement of Financial Accounting Standards Number 157, Fair Value Measurements (FAS 157). This statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. FAS 157 is not expected to have a material effect on the financial statements.
c) Realized gains or losses on the sale of investments are calculated using the specific identification method.
d) Interest income adjusted for amortization of premium and accretion of discount is recorded on an accrual basis. Origination, closing and/or commitment fees associated with investments in portfolio companies are accreted into interest income over the respective terms of the applicable loans. Upon the prepayment of a loan or debt security, any prepayment penalties and unamortized loan origination, closing and commitment fees are recorded as interest income.
e) Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date.
27
In determining the fair value of our portfolio investments at December 31, 2006, the Audit Committee considered valuations from the independent valuation firm and from management having an aggregate range of $193,300 to $203,800.
As of December 31, 2006, we continue to pursue our investment strategy and 69.4% of our net assets are invested in energy companies.
We invest in companies in the energy industry, most of which have relatively short or no operating histories. These companies are and will be subject to all of the business risk and uncertainties associated with any new business enterprise, including the risk that these companies may not reach their investment objective or the value of our investment in them may decline substantially or fall to zero.
Our portfolio had an annualized current yield of 17.1% and 18.3% across all our long-term debt and certain equity investments as of December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively. This yield includes interest from all of our long-term investments as well as dividends from GSHI in both years and Unity Virginia (Unity) in 2005. We expect the current yield to decline over time as we increase the size of the portfolio. Monetization of other equity positions that we hold is not included in this yield calculation. In each of our portfolio companies, we hold equity positions, ranging from minority interests to majority stakes, which we expect over time to contribute significantly to our investment returns. Many of these equity positions include features such as contractual minimum internal rate of returns, preferred distributions, flip structures and other features expected to generate additional investment returns, as well as contractual protections and preferences over junior equity, in addition to the yield and security offered by our cash flow and collateral debt protections. Set forth below are several views of our investment portfolio, classified by type of investment, geographic diversification and energy sector diversification at December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively:
Type of Investment |
12/31/06 Fair Value (000s) |
% of Portfolio |
12/31/05 Fair Value (000s) |
% of Portfolio |
||||||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents | $ | 93,247 | 31.7 | % | $ | 26,831 | 25.6 | % | ||||
Senior Secured Debt | 128,916 | 43.9 | % | 41,296 | 39.5 | % | ||||||
Subordinated Secured Debt | 47,993 | 16.3 | % | 21,387 | 20.4 | % | ||||||
Common Stock | 22,456 | 7.6 | % | 11,700 | 11.2 | % | ||||||
Preferred Stock | 50 | 0.0 | % | 2,109 | 2.0 | % | ||||||
Warrants | 1,405 | 0.5 | % | 1,334 | 1.3 | % | ||||||
Total Portfolio | $ | 294,067 | 100.0 | % | $ | 104,657 | 100.0 | % | ||||
Geographic Exposure |
12/31/06 Fair Value (000s) |
% of Portfolio | 12/31/05 Fair Value (000s) |
% of Portfolio |
||||||||
Midwest U.S. | $ | 35,898 | 12.2 | % | $ | 14,624 | 14.0 | % | ||||
Northeast U.S. | 23,693 | 8.1 | % | 10,509 | 10.0 | % | ||||||
Southeast U.S. | 35,097 | 11.9 | % | 9,611 | 9.2 | % | ||||||
Southwest U.S. | 79,473 | 27.0 | % | 43,082 | 41.2 | % | ||||||
Canada | 26,659 | 9.1 | % | | | |||||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents | 93,247 | 31.7 | % | 26,831 | 25.6 | % | ||||||
Total Portfolio | $ | 294,067 | 100.0 | % | $ | 104,657 | 100.0 | % |
28
Energy Sector |
12/31/06 Fair Value (000s) |
% of Portfolio | |
12/31/05 Fair Value (000s) |
% of Portfolio | |||||||
Biofuels/Ethanol | $ | 8,000 | 2.7 | % | $ | | | |||||
Biomass Power | 23,693 | 8.1 | % | 10,509 | 10.1 | % | ||||||
Construction Services | 22,694 | 7.7 | % | | | |||||||
Gas Gathering and Processing | 37,700 | 12.8 | % | 30,100 | 28.8 | % | ||||||
Manufacturing | 12,393 | 4.2 | % | | | |||||||
Mining and Coal Production | 15,129 | 5.2 | % | 9,421 | 9.0 | % | ||||||
Natural Gas Marketing | 5,216 | 1.8 | % | | | |||||||
Oil and Gas Production | 46,710 | 15.9 | % | 18,673 | 17.8 | % | ||||||
Production Services | 18,660 | 6.3 | % | | | |||||||
Seismic Services | 4,214 | 1.4 | % | 9,123 | 8.7 | % | ||||||
Shipping | 6,411 | 2.2 | % | | | |||||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents | 93,247 | 31.7 | % | 26,831 | 25.6 | % | ||||||
Total Portfolio | $ | 294,067 | 100.0 | % | $ | 104,657 | 100.0 | % |
Results of Operations
Investment Activity
We completed our eleventh quarter, which was our tenth full quarter since completion of our initial public offering on July 30, 2004, with approximately 69.4% of our net assets or about $200,820 invested in nineteen long-term portfolio investments and 32.3% of our net assets invested in money market funds. The remainder (1.7%) of our net assets represents liabilities in excess of other assets.
Long-Term Portfolio Investments
During the quarter ended December 31, 2006, we completed two new investments in Jettco Marine Services LLC (Jettco) and TLOGH, L.P. (TLOGH) and follow on investments in existing portfolio companies, totaling approximately $62,573.
On October 31, 2006, the Company made a $15,500 senior secured investment in TLOGH, a Dallas, Texas based gas development company.
On November 9, 2006, the Company made a $6,500 senior secured investment in Jettco, a Morgan City, Louisiana based offshore supply vessel company.
On December 4, 2006, the Company invested an additional $6,200 for drilling purposes into Stryker Energy LLC (Stryker), the Appalachian gas production company that is the successor to Stryker Energy II, LLC (Stryker II), replacing Stryker II as the borrowing entity. The Companys prior loan of $15,330 into Stryker II is now in a senior subordinated loan against the expanded collateral and cash flow pool of Stryker, and the Companys equity interest in Stryker II has been converted into a more tax-efficient, yield-enhancing overriding royalty interest in Stryker. The full refinanced loan of $22,683 into Stryker is included in the new investments total, while the refinanced $16,800 with Stryker II is included in the debt repayments and sales of equity securities total.
During the three months ended December 31, 2006, the Company provided additional funding to AOG, AEH, Arctic Acquisition Corp., Conquest Cherokee, LLC, Genesis, NRG, Whymore and WECO.
We classify our investments by level of control. As defined in the 1940 Act, control investments are those where there is the ability or power to exercise a controlling influence over the management or policies of a company. Control is generally deemed to exist when a company or individual owns more than 25% or more of the voting securities of an investee company. Affiliated investments and affiliated companies are defined by a lesser degree of influence and are deemed to exist through ownership of 5% or more of the outstanding voting securities of another person.
As of December 31, 2006, we held a controlling interest in AOG, GSHI, NRG, WECO and Whymore. As of December 31, 2006, we held an affiliated interest in AEH, Genesis and Iron Horse.
29
Level of Control | 12/31/06 Fair Value (000s) |
% of Portfolio | 12/31/05 Fair Value (000s) |
% of Portfolio | ||||||||
Control | $ | 98,133 | 33.4 | % | $ | 30,100 | 28.8 | % | ||||
Affiliate | 22,107 | 7.5 | % | | | |||||||
Non-Control/Non-Affiliate | 80,580 | 27.4 | % | 47,726 | 45.6 | % | ||||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents | 93,247 | 31.7 | % | 26,831 | 25.6 | % | ||||||
Total Portfolio | $ | 294,067 | 100.0 | % | $ | 104,657 | 100.00 | % |
Our Investment Adviser continues to conduct due diligence and finalize terms regarding future transactions. However, we can offer no assurance as to when or if any of these transactions will close.
Investment Income
We generate revenue in the form of interest income on the debt securities that we own, dividend income on any common or preferred stock that we own, and amortized loan origination fees on the structuring of new deals. Our investments, if in the form of debt securities, will typically have a term of one to ten years and bear interest at a fixed or floating rate. To the extent achievable, we will seek to collateralize our investments by obtaining security interests in our portfolio companies assets. We also may acquire minority or majority equity interests in our portfolio companies, which may pay cash or in-kind dividends on a recurring or otherwise negotiated basis. In addition, we may generate revenue in other forms including prepayment penalties and possibly consultation fees. Any such fees generated in connection with our investments are recognized as earned.
Investment income, which consists of interest income, dividend income and amortized loan origination fees, was $8,171 and $3,935 for the three months ended December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively, and $14,603 and $7,044 for the six months ended December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively.
Operating Expenses
Our primary operating expenses consist of investment advisory fees (base and incentive fees), credit facility costs, legal and professional fees and other operating and overhead-related expenses. These expenses include our allocable portion of overhead under the Administration Agreement with Prospect Administration under which Prospect Administration provides administrative services and facilities for Prospect Energy. Our investment advisory fees compensate our Investment Adviser for its work in identifying, evaluating, negotiating, closing and monitoring our investments. We bear all other costs and expenses of our operations and transactions in accordance with our Administration Agreement with Prospect Administration.
Operating expenses were $3,678 and $1,895 for the three months ended December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively, and $6,836 and $3,589 for the six months ended December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively. These expenses consisted of investment advisory and administrative services fees, credit facility costs, professional fees, insurance expenses, directors fees and other general and administrative expenses. The base investment advisory fees were $1,568 and $524 for the three months ended December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively, and $2,184 and $1,034 for the six months ended December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively. $1,123 and $508 income incentive fees were earned for the three months ended December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively, and $1,941 and $508 income incentive fees were earned for the six months ended December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively. No capital gains incentive fee has yet been incurred pursuant to the Investment Advisory Agreement.
During the three months ended December 31, 2006, the Company incurred $370 of expenses related to the credit facility, comprised of $46 in interest expense, $253 in amortization of deferred financing costs, and $71 in commitment fees on the unused portion of the credit facility.
30
Net Investment Income, Net Realized Gains, Net Unrealized Appreciation and Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations
Prospect Energys net investment income was $4,493 and $2,040 for the three months ended December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively, and $7,767 and $3,455 for the six months ended December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively. Net investment income represents the difference between investment income and operating expenses and is directly impacted by the items described above. Net realized gains (losses) were ($1) and $0 for the three months ended December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively, and $1,950 and ($18) for the six months ended December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively. Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) was ($1,552) and $488 for the three months ended December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively, and ($2,813) and $564 for the six months ended December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively. Net increase in net assets resulting from operations represents the sum of the returns generated from net investment income, realized gains (losses) and the change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation).
Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources
We generated $82,526 in cash from the net proceeds of our August secondary offering and after accounting for offering costs. We generated $100,537 in cash from the net proceeds of our December secondary offering and after accounting for offering costs. We used cash flows in operating activities totaling ($100,537) for the three months ended December 31, 2006 compared to ($4,861) for the three months ended December 31, 2005. We declared dividends totaling $7,264 for the three months ended December 31, 2006 (but paid the cash portion in January 2007) compared to $1,975 for the three months ended December 31, 2005. In the future, we may continue to fund a portion of our investments through borrowings from banks, issuances of senior securities or secondary offerings. We may also securitize a portion of our investments in mezzanine or senior secured loans or other assets. Our objective is to put in place such borrowings in order to expand our portfolio. Our primary use of funds will be investments in portfolio companies and cash distributions to holders of our common stock.
At December 31, 2006, we held no cash in the segregated account maintained in conjunction with a limited indemnity issued to Citibank Texas, N.A. (formerly First American Bank, SSB). The limited indemnity with Citibank required us to indemnify Citibank for up to $12,000 for any losses it realizes on its term loan to GSHI resulting only from potential legal claims that might or could be asserted by certain third parties. This limited indemnity was backed by the funds in the segregated account. During the three months ended December 31, 2005, $9,587 of previously segregated funds were released to the Company. These reductions reflected a waiver of the segregated funds requirement due to the developments related to legal claims and prior payments by GSHI to Citibank Texas, N.A.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
There has been no material change in quantitative or qualitative disclosures about market risk as previously disclosed in our most recent 10-K filing.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, the Companys chief executive officer and chief financial officer conducted an evaluation of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Based upon this evaluation, the Companys chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures are effective to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure of any material information relating to the Company that is required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
31
There have been no changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2006 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
The Company is a defendant in two legal actions arising out of its activities. While predicting the outcome of litigation is inherently very difficult, and the ultimate resolution, range of possible loss and possible impact on operating results cannot be reliably estimated, management believes, based upon its understanding of the facts and the advice of legal counsel, that it has meritorious defenses for both actions. We continue to defend both of these actions vigorously, and believe that resolution of these actions will not have a materially adverse effect on the Companys financial position.
On December 6, 2004, DGP served Prospect Energy with a complaint filed November 30, 2004 in the U.S. District for the Southern District of Texas, Galveston Division. DGP alleges that DGP was defrauded and that Prospect Energy breached its fiduciary duty to DGP and tortiously interfered with DGPs contract to purchase Gas Solutions, Ltd. (a subsidiary of our portfolio company, GSHI) in connection with Prospect Energys alleged agreement in September 2004 to loan DGP funds with which DGP intended to buy Gas Solutions, Ltd. for approximately $26,000. The complaint seeks relief not limited to $100,000. We believe that the DGP complaint is frivolous and without merit, and intend to defend the matter vigorously. On November 30, 2005, U.S. Magistrate Judge John R. Froeschner of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Galveston Division, issued a recommendation that the court grant Prospect Energys Motion for Summary Judgment dismissing all claims by DGP. On February 21, 2006, U.S. District Judge Samuel Kent of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Galveston Division issued an order granting Prospect Energys Motion for Summary Judgment dismissing all claims by Dallas Gas Partners, L.P., against Prospect Energy Corporation. DGP has appealed this decision.
On April 7, 2005 a former officer of the Company filed a complaint with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration of the Department of Labor (OSHA) alleging discrimination, retaliation, infliction of emotional distress and other claims. This officer seeks economic reinstatement and other relief. On September 15, 2005, OSHA issued findings, including an order dismissing this complaint. The complainant has filed written objections to the order and had a hearing before an Administrative Law Judge on March 16, 2006. On May 5, 2006, the Administrative Law Judge issued a Decision and Order granting Summary Decision and dismissing the Complaint, which the former officer has appealed. The Company does not believe that these claims, even if ultimately resolved against the Company, would be material. The Company believes the complaint is frivolous and without merit and intends to defend itself vigorously.
From time to time, we may become involved in various investigations, claims and legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of our business. These matters may relate to intellectual property, employment, tax, regulation, contract or other matters. The resolution of these matters as they arise will be subject to various uncertainties and, even if such claims are without merit, could result in the expenditure of significant financial and managerial resources.
There have been no material changes from risk factors as previously disclosed in our most recent 10-K filing.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
During the three months ended December 31, 2006, we issued a total of 108,047 shares of common stock under our dividend reinvestment plan. The aggregate value for the shares of common stock issued under the dividend reinvestment plan was approximately $1,851.
32
The following table reflects the history of shares issued under the dividend reinvestment plan:
Date | Shares Issued | Aggregate Offering Price | % of Dividend | |||||
March 31, 2006 | 6,841 | $ | 110 | 5.2 | % | |||
June 30, 2006 | 7,932 | 130 | 5.4 | % | ||||
September 29, 2006 | 80,818 | 1,273 | 26.2 | % | ||||
December 29, 2006 | 108,047 | 1,851 | 25.5 | % |
Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities
Not applicable
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
As previously announced, the 2006 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company (Meeting) was convened at the offices of the Company on Wednesday, November 29, 2006, at 10:30 a.m. No business was conducted and the Meeting was adjourned until December 13, 2006 at 1:00 p.m. in order to provide additional time to solicit proxies. The Company continued to solicit proxies leading up to the reconvening of the Meeting. The Meeting was reconvened on December 13, 2006 at 1:00 p.m. at the offices of Company. No business was conducted and the Meeting was adjourned until January 17, 2006 at 1:00 p.m. in order to provide additional time to solicit proxies. The Meeting was reconvened on Wednesday, January 17, 2007 at 1:00 p.m. at the offices of Company. No business was conducted and the Meeting was adjourned until January 19, 2007 at 4:00 p.m. in order to provide additional time to solicit proxies. The Meeting was reconvened on Friday, January 19, 2007 at 4:00 p.m. at the offices of the Company and it was determined that a quorum was established and that all three proposals before the Companys stockholders were approved as follows:
To elect one Class I director of the Company, to serve for a term of two years, or until a successor is duly elected and qualified, and to elect two Class II directors of the Company, who will each serve for a term of three years, or until their successors are duly elected and qualified; and
Votes | % of Shares | |||||||
Voted | ||||||||
Class I Director | ||||||||
F. Lee Liebolt, Jr. | Affirmative | 8,067,554.62 | 92.27 | % | ||||
Withheld | 675,530.98 | 7.73 | % | |||||
Class II Directors | ||||||||
M. Grier Eliasek | Affirmative | 7,896,125.58 | 90.31 | % | ||||
Withheld | 846,960.02 | 9.69 | % | |||||
William J. Gremp | Affirmative | 8,103,470.55 | 92.68 | % | ||||
Withheld | 639,615.05 | 7.32 | % | |||||
To ratify the selection of BDO Seidman, LLP to serve as the Companys independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2007; and | ||||||||
Votes | % of Shares | |||||||
Voted | ||||||||
For | 8,418,221.19 | 96.31 | % | |||||
Against | 198,614.36 | 2.27 | % | |||||
Abstain | 126,250.05 | 1.44 | % |
33
To approve a proposal to authorize flexibility for the Company, pursuant to approval of its Board of Directors, to sell shares of its common stock during the next year at a price below the Companys then current net asset value per share.
Votes | % of Shares | ||||
Voted | |||||
(Without affiliated votes) | |||||
For | 5,870983.67 | 67.15 | % | ||
Against | 1,843,329.20 | 21.08 | % | ||
Abstain | 223,496.70 | 2.56 | % | ||
Broker non-vote | 805,276.03 | 9.21 | % | ||
(With affiliated votes) | |||||
For | 6,029,560.54 | 67.73 | % | ||
Against | 1,843,329.20 | 20.71 | % | ||
Abstain | 223,496.70 | 2.51 | % | ||
Broker non-votes | 805,276.03 | 9.05 | % |
None
The following exhibits are filed as part of this report or hereby incorporated by reference to exhibits previously filed with the SEC (according to the number assigned to them in Item 601 of Regulation S-K):
3.1 | Articles of Incorporation (1). | |
3.2 | Amended and Restated Bylaws (2). | |
4.1 | Form of Share Certificate (2). | |
10.1 | Investment Advisory Agreement between Registrant and Prospect Capital Management, LLC (2). | |
10.2 | Custodian Agreement (3). | |
10.3 | Administration Agreement between Registrant and Prospect Administration, LLC (2). | |
10.4 | Transfer Agency and Service Agreement (3). | |
10.5 | Dividend Reinvestment Plan (2). | |
10.6 | License Agreement between Registrant and Prospect Capital Management, LLC (2). | |
11 | Computation of Per Share Earnings (included in the notes to the financial statements contained in this report). | |
12 | Computation of Ratios (included in the notes to the financial statements contained in this report). | |
14 | Code of Conduct (4) | |
16 | Letter regarding change in certifying accountant (5). | |
21 | Subsidiaries of the Registrant: none. | |
22.1 | Proxy Statement (6). |
34
31.1* | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. | |
31.2* | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. | |
32.1* | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350). | |
32.2* | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350). |
* Filed herewith. | ||
(1) | Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Registration Statement on Form N-2 (File No. 333-114522), filed on April 16, 2004. | |
(2) | Incorporated by reference to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 2 to the Registrants Registration Statement on Form N-2 (File No. 333-114522), filed on July 6, 2004. | |
(3) | Incorporated by reference to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 3 to the Registrants Registration Statement on Form N-2 (File No. 333-114522), filed on July 23, 2004. | |
(4) | Incorporated by reference from the Registrants Form 10-K filed on September 28, 2006. | |
(5) | Incorporated by reference to the form 8-K/A (File No. 814-00659), filed on January 21, 2005. | |
(6) | Incorporated by reference from the Registrants Proxy Statement filed on October 19, 2006. |
35
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized on February 9, 2007.
PROSPECT ENERGY CORPORATION | |||
By: | /s/ John F. Barry III | ||
John F. Barry III | |||
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board |
36