mueller_def14a.htm
SCHEDULE 14A
(Rule 14a-101)
INFORMATION REQUIRED
IN PROXY STATEMENT
SCHEDULE 14A
INFORMATION
Proxy Statement
Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment
No. )
Filed by the Registrant
[x]
Filed by a Party other
than the Registrant [_]
Check the appropriate box:
[_] Preliminary Proxy
Statement
[_] Soliciting Material Under
Rule
[_] Confidential,
For Use of
the
14a-12
Commission Only (as permitted
by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
[x] Definitive Proxy Statement
[_] Definitive
Additional Materials
Mueller Industries, Inc.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Name of Registrant as
Specified In Its Charter)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Name of Person(s)
Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee
(Check the appropriate box):
[x] No fee required.
[_] Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and
0-11.
1) Title of
each class of securities to which transaction applies:
____________________________________________________________________________________
2) Aggregate number of securities to
which transaction applies:
3) Per unit price or
other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to
Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the
amount on
which the filing fee is
calculated and state how it was
determined):
4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of
transaction:
____________________________________________________________________________________
5) Total fee paid:
[_] Fee paid previously with preliminary
materials:
[_] Check box if any part of the fee is offset
as provided by Exchange Act Rule
0-11(a)(2) and identify the
filing for which
the offsetting fee was paid
previously. Identify the previous
filing by registration statement number,
or the form
or
schedule and the date of its
filing.
____________________________________________________________________________________
1) Amount
previously paid:
____________________________________________________________________________________
2) Form,
Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
____________________________________________________________________________________
3) Filing
Party:
____________________________________________________________________________________
4) Date
Filed:
MUELLER INDUSTRIES, INC.
8285 Tournament Drive, Suite 150
Memphis,
Tennessee 38125
Telephone (901)
753-3200
________________________
Notice of Annual Meeting of
Stockholders to be Held
May 6,
2010
________________________
To the Stockholders
of
Mueller Industries,
Inc.
The Annual Meeting of
Stockholders of Mueller Industries, Inc. (the “Company” or “Mueller”), will be
held at the Company’s headquarters at 8285 Tournament Drive, Suite 150, Memphis,
Tennessee 38125 on Thursday, May 6, 2010, at 10:00 A.M. local time, for the
following purposes:
1. |
|
To
elect seven directors, each to serve until the next annual meeting of
stockholders (tentatively scheduled for May 5, 2011) or until his
successor is elected and qualified; |
|
2. |
|
To
consider and act upon a proposal to approve the appointment of Ernst &
Young LLP, independent registered public accountants, as auditors of the
Company for the fiscal year ending December 25, 2010; and |
|
3. |
|
To
consider and transact such other business as may properly be brought
before the Annual Meeting and any adjournment(s)
thereof. |
Only stockholders of
record at the close of business on March 9, 2010, will be entitled to notice of
and vote at the Annual Meeting or any adjournment(s) thereof. A complete list of
stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting will be prepared and
maintained at the Company’s corporate headquarters at 8285 Tournament Drive,
Suite 150, Memphis, Tennessee 38125. This list will be available for inspection
by stockholders of record during normal business hours for a period of at least
10 days prior to the Annual Meeting.
IT IS IMPORTANT THAT
YOUR SHARES BE REPRESENTED AT THE ANNUAL MEETING REGARDLESS OF THE SIZE OF YOUR
HOLDINGS. WHETHER OR NOT YOU INTEND TO BE PRESENT AT THE MEETING IN PERSON, WE
URGE YOU TO MARK, DATE AND SIGN THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD AND RETURN IT IN THE
ENCLOSED SELF-ADDRESSED ENVELOPE, WHICH REQUIRES NO POSTAGE IF MAILED IN THE
UNITED STATES.
|
|
|
Gary C. Wilkerson |
|
Corporate
Secretary |
March 24,
2010
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SOLICITATION OF PROXIES |
1 |
VOTING SECURITIES |
2 |
PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS |
3 |
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS |
4 |
OWNERSHIP OF COMMON STOCK BY DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE |
|
OFFICERS AND
INFORMATION ABOUT DIRECTOR NOMINEES |
5 |
Meetings and
Committees of the Board of Directors |
10 |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE |
12 |
Director
Independence |
12 |
Independent
Directors |
14 |
Audit
Committee |
14 |
Compensation
Committee |
15 |
Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee |
15 |
Compensation
Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation |
17 |
Corporate
Governance Guidelines |
18 |
Code of
Business Conduct and Ethics |
18 |
Policies and
Procedures for Approval of Related Party Transactions |
19 |
Directors’
Attendance at Annual Meetings of Stockholders |
19 |
Communication
With the Board of Directors |
19 |
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS |
20 |
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE FOR 2009 |
29 |
2009 GRANTS OF PLAN BASED AWARDS TABLE |
30 |
OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL 2009 YEAR-END |
31 |
2009 OPTION EXERCISES |
32 |
POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UNDER EMPLOYMENT AND CONSULTING |
|
AGREEMENTS AS
OF THE END OF 2009 |
37 |
2009 DIRECTOR COMPENSATION |
37 |
REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS |
38 |
REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF |
|
DIRECTORS ON
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
39 |
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION |
40 |
APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING
FIRM |
40 |
STOCKHOLDER NOMINATIONS FOR BOARD MEMBERSHIP AND OTHER |
|
PROPOSALS FOR
2011 ANNUAL MEETING |
42 |
OTHER MATTERS TO COME BEFORE THE ANNUAL MEETING |
42 |
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP COMPLIANCE REPORTING |
43 |
OTHER INFORMATION |
43 |
NOTICE OF INTERNET AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS |
43 |
HOUSEHOLDING OF ANNUAL MEETING MATERIALS |
44 |
MUELLER INDUSTRIES, INC.
8285 Tournament Drive,
Suite 150
Memphis, Tennessee 38125
Telephone (901)
753-3200
____________________________
PROXY STATEMENT
Annual Meeting of Stockholders
May 6,
2010
____________________________
SOLICITATION OF PROXIES
The accompanying
proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors of Mueller Industries, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the “Company”), for use at the annual meeting of
stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) to be held at the Company’s headquarters at
8285 Tournament Drive, Suite 150, Memphis, Tennessee 38125, on Thursday, May 6,
2010, at 10:00 A.M. local time, or at any adjournment(s) thereof.
This Proxy Statement,
together with the Company’s Annual Report for the fiscal year ended December 26,
2009, is first being mailed to stockholders on or about March 24, 2010. Pursuant
to rules recently adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Company
is providing access to its proxy materials over the Internet at
http://www.proxyvote.com.
When a proxy card is
returned properly signed, the shares represented thereby will be voted in
accordance with the stockholder’s directions appearing on the card. If the proxy
card is signed and returned without directions, the shares will be voted for the
nominees named herein and in accordance with the recommendations of the
Company’s Board of Directors as set forth herein. The discretion granted in the
accompanying proxy card includes the authority to vote on all additional matters
properly coming before the Annual Meeting as the persons named in the proxy deem
appropriate. A stockholder giving a proxy may revoke it at any time before it is
voted at the Annual Meeting by giving written notice to the secretary of the
Annual Meeting or by casting a ballot at the Annual Meeting. Votes cast by proxy
or in person at the Annual Meeting will be tabulated by election inspectors
appointed for the Annual Meeting. The election inspectors will also determine
whether a quorum is present. The holders of a majority of the shares of common
stock, $.01 par value per share (“Common Stock”), outstanding and entitled to
vote
- 1
-
who are present either in
person or represented by proxy will constitute a quorum for the Annual Meeting.
The election inspectors will treat abstentions as shares that are present and
entitled to vote for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum and for
purposes of determining the approval of any matter submitted. If a broker
indicates on a proxy that it does not have discretionary authority as to certain
shares to vote on a particular matter (i.e., a “broker non-vote”), those shares
will not be considered as present and entitled to vote with respect to that
matter, but will be treated as shares that are present and entitled to vote for
purposes of determining the presence of a quorum. A broker is entitled to vote
shares held for a beneficial owner on routine matters, such as the ratification
of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent
registered public accounting firm, without instructions from the beneficial
owner of those shares; on the other hand, a broker may not be entitled to vote
shares held for a beneficial owner on certain non-routine items, such as the
election of directors, absent instructions from the beneficial owners of such
shares.
The cost of
soliciting proxies will be borne by the Company. In addition to solicitation by
mail, directors, officers and employees of the Company may solicit proxies by
telephone or otherwise. The Company will reimburse brokers or other persons
holding stock in their names or in the names of their nominees for their charges
and expenses in forwarding proxies and proxy material to the beneficial owners
of such stock.
VOTING SECURITIES
The Company had
37,649,584 shares of Common Stock outstanding at the close of business on March
9, 2010, which are the only securities of the Company entitled to be voted at
the Annual Meeting. The record holder of each share of Common Stock is entitled
to one vote on each matter that may properly be brought before the Annual
Meeting. Only stockholders of record at the close of business on March 9, 2010
will be entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting. The Company’s
Restated Certificate of Incorporation and Amended and Restated Bylaws (“Bylaws”)
do not provide for cumulative voting for the election of directors.
- 2
-
PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS
As of March 9, 2010,
the following parties were known by the Company to be the “beneficial owner” of
more than five percent of the Common Stock:
|
|
Shares Beneficially |
|
|
Name and Address of Beneficial
Owner |
|
Owned |
|
Percent of Class |
Franklin Resources, Inc. |
|
2,363,050(1) |
|
6.28%(2) |
One Franklin
Parkway |
|
|
|
|
San Mateo, CA
94403-1906 |
|
|
|
|
BlackRock, Inc. |
|
2,998,543(3) |
|
7.96%(2) |
40 East 52nd
Street |
|
|
|
|
New York, NY
10022 |
|
|
|
|
Wells Fargo & Company |
|
2,116,022(4) |
|
5.62%(2) |
420 Montgomery
Street |
|
|
|
|
San Francisco,
CA 94163 |
|
|
|
|
AXA Financial, Inc. |
|
1,972,139(5) |
|
5.24%(2) |
1290 Avenue of
the Americas |
|
|
|
|
New York, New
York 10104 |
|
|
|
|
____________________
(1) |
|
This
information is based on a Schedule 13G/A filed by Franklin Resources, Inc.
(“FRI”) with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 27, 2010.
In the Schedule 13G/A, FRI reported that, with respect to the Company’s
Common Stock, the shares shown in the table above were beneficially owned
by one or more open or closed-end investment companies or other managed
accounts that are investment management clients of investment managers
that are direct and indirect subsidiaries of FRI. The Schedule 13G/A
reported that the investment management subsidiaries of FRI have
investment and/or voting power over the securities owned by their
investment management clients. Accordingly, such subsidiaries may be
deemed to be the beneficial owner of the shares shown in the table. The
Schedule 13G/A reported that Charles B. Johnson and Rupert H. Johnson, Jr.
(the “FRI Principal Stockholders”) (each of whom has the same business
address as FRI) each own in excess of 10% of the outstanding common stock
of FRI and are the principal stockholders of FRI and may be deemed to be
the beneficial owners of securities held by persons and entities for whom
or for which the investment management subsidiaries of FRI provide
investment management services. The Schedule 13G/A reported that one of
the investment management subsidiaries, Franklin Advisory Services, LLC
(whose address is One Parker Plaza, 9th Floor, Fort Lee, New Jersey
07024), has sole voting and dispositive power with respect to 2,288,750
and 2,353,050, respectively, of the shares shown. FRI, the FRI Principal
Stockholders and the investment management subsidiaries of FRI disclaim
any pecuniary interest or beneficial ownership in the shares shown in the
table above and indicate that they are of the view that they are not
acting as a “group” for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended (the “Exchange Act”). |
|
(2)
|
|
The
percent of class shown was based on the shares of Common Stock reported on
the Schedule 13G or 13G/A and the total number of shares outstanding as of
December 26, 2009. The difference in the total number of shares
outstanding on December 26, 2009 and March 9, 2010 does not materially
affect the percentage of ownership of the
class. |
- 3
-
(3) |
|
This
information is based on a Schedule 13G filed by BlackRock, Inc. with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on January 29, 2010. Upon completion of
its acquisition of Barclays Global Investors, NA, Barclays Global
Investors, NA and substantially all of its affiliates are now subsidiaries
of BlackRock, Inc. |
|
(4) |
|
This
information is based on a Schedule 13G/A filed by Wells Fargo &
Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 25, 2010.
Wells Fargo & Company filed this Schedule 13G/A on its own behalf and
on behalf of its subsidiary, Evergreen Investment Management Company,
LLC. |
|
(5) |
|
This
information is based on a Schedule 13G filed by AXA Financial, Inc., AXA,
AXA Assurances I.A.R.D. Mutuelle and AXA Assurances Vie Mutuelle with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on February 12, 2010. Each of these
entities may be deemed to beneficially own shares over which certain
indirect and direct subsidiaries exercise voting and dispositive power in
their capacity as investment advisors. The majority of the shares reported
in the Schedule 13G are held by unaffiliated third-party client accounts
that are managed by AllianceBernstein L.P., a majority owned subsidiary of
AXA Financial, Inc. |
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
The size of the
Company’s Board of Directors is currently seven directors. The Board of
Directors proposes to elect the following seven persons, each as nominated by
the Board of Directors, at the Annual Meeting to serve (subject to the Company’s
Bylaws) as directors of the Company until the next Annual Meeting (tentatively
scheduled for May 5, 2011), or until the election and qualification of their
successors: Alexander P. Federbush, Paul J. Flaherty, Gennaro J. Fulvio, Gary S.
Gladstein, Scott J. Goldman, Terry Hermanson, and Harvey L. Karp (collectively,
the “Nominees”). If any such person should be unwilling or unable to serve as a
director of the Company, which is not anticipated, the persons named in the
proxy will vote the proxy for substitute nominees selected by them unless the
number of directors has been reduced to the number of nominees willing and able
to serve.
Directors are elected
by a plurality of the votes cast. “Plurality” means that the individuals who
receive the greatest number of votes cast “For” are elected as directors up to
the maximum number of directors to be chosen at the Annual Meeting.
Consequently, any shares not voted “For” a particular director (whether as a
result of a direction to withhold or a broker non-vote) will not be counted in
such director’s favor.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTE THEIR
SHARES FOR EACH OF THE
NOMINEES.
- 4
-
OWNERSHIP OF COMMON STOCK BY DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE
OFFICERS AND INFORMATION ABOUT DIRECTOR
NOMINEES
The following table
sets forth, as of March 9, 2010, information about the 1,184,000 shares of
Common Stock (calculated based on 37,649,584 shares outstanding) beneficially
owned by each of the Company’s current directors, nominees for director,
executive officers and named executive officers. The “named executive officers”
are those individuals set forth in the “Summary Compensation Table for 2009”
included herein. Unless otherwise indicated, all directors, nominees for
director, executive officers and named executive officers have sole voting and
investment power with respect to the shares of Common Stock reported. The table
and the accompanying footnotes set forth the foregoing persons’ current
positions with the Company, principal occupations and employment over the
preceding five years, age and directorships held in certain other publicly-owned
companies, as well as, with respect to directors, the experiences,
qualifications, attributes or skills that caused the Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee and the Board of Directors to determine that the person
should serve as a director of the Company in 2010.
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
Beneficially |
|
|
|
|
Owned as of |
|
Percent of |
Principal Occupation, Employment,
etc. |
|
March 9, 2010 |
|
Class |
Alexander P. Federbush |
|
13,000 |
|
|
* |
Director of the Company since February 17, 2005; age 67
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paul J. Flaherty |
|
6,000 |
|
|
* |
Director of the Company since August 2,
2007; age 70 (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gennaro J. Fulvio |
|
19,000 |
|
|
* |
Director of the Company since May 9, 2002; age 53 (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gary S. Gladstein |
|
34,736 |
|
|
* |
Director of the Company since July 1,
2000; Director of Jos. A. |
|
|
|
|
|
Bank Clothiers, Inc. and IRSA
Inversiones Y Representaciones S.A.; |
|
|
|
|
|
age 65 (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scott J. Goldman |
|
4,000 |
|
|
* |
Director of the Company since January 1, 2008; age 57 (5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Terry Hermanson |
|
11,000 |
|
|
* |
Director of the Company since February
13, 2003; age 67 (6) |
|
|
|
|
|
- 5
-
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
Beneficially |
|
|
|
|
Owned as of |
|
Percent of |
Principal Occupation, Employment,
etc. |
|
March 9, 2010 |
|
Class |
Harvey L. Karp |
|
241,886 |
|
|
* |
Chairman of the Board of Directors since October 8, 1991; |
|
|
|
|
|
Director since August 1991; age 82 (7) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gregory L. Christopher |
|
258,427 |
|
|
* |
Chief Executive Officer of the Company
since October 30, 2008; |
|
|
|
|
|
age 48 (8) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard W. Corman |
|
47,907 |
|
|
* |
Vice President-Controller of the Company since October 28,
2004; |
|
|
|
|
|
age 53 (9) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John B. Hansen |
|
30,358 |
|
|
* |
President, Manufacturing Operations -
Standard Products Division |
|
|
|
|
|
of the Company since May 18, 2009, age
63 (10) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Roy C. Harris |
|
50,160 |
|
|
* |
Vice President and Chief Information Officer of the
Company |
|
|
|
|
|
since December 19, 2006; age 67 (11) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jeffrey A. Martin |
|
19,714 |
|
|
* |
Vice President - Finance & Corporate
Development since |
|
|
|
|
|
August 1, 2008; age 43 (12) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kent A. McKee |
|
270,414 |
|
|
* |
Executive Vice President of the Company since October 13,
2005; |
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer of the Company since April 1, 1999; age 49
(13) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James H. Rourke |
|
137,398 |
|
|
* |
President - Industrial Products Division
of the Company since |
|
|
|
|
|
December 27, 2003; age 61 (14) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gary C. Wilkerson |
|
40,000 |
|
|
* |
Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of the
Company |
|
|
|
|
|
since May 2, 2005; age 63 (15) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Officers and Directors as a
Group |
|
1,184,000 |
|
|
3.09%** |
____________________
* |
|
Less
than 1% |
|
**
|
|
Includes 706,667 shares of Common Stock which are subject to
currently exercisable stock options and 56,000 shares of non-vested
restricted stock held by executive officers and directors of the
Company. |
- 6
-
(1) |
|
Mr.
Federbush served as the President of the Queens West Development Corp., a
subsidiary of the Empire State Development Corporation, a public-benefit
corporation that is a joint venture among New York State, New York City
and the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, for more than the past
five years until his departure from the corporation on December 31, 2007.
Mr. Federbush has served as a director of Varick Realty Corp. since 1970,
including as Chairman since 1976. Mr. Federbush was nominated to serve as
a director of the Company because he has extensive experience guiding
complex organizations, both in commercial real estate and manufacturing
and distribution. The number of shares of Common Stock beneficially owned
by Mr. Federbush includes (i) 2,000 shares of Common Stock owned by Mr.
Federbush’s spouse, (ii) 1,000 shares of Common Stock owned by a
corporation in which Mr. Federbush is an officer and (iii) 10,000 shares
of Common Stock which are subject to currently exercisable stock
options. |
|
(2) |
|
Mr.
Flaherty has been a member of the Advisory Board of Aon Risk Services,
Inc., a subsidiary of Aon Corporation (“Aon”), the global insurance and
risk management firm, since 2001. Prior to his tenure with Aon, Mr.
Flaherty was associated with Burson-Marsteller- WPP, a global public
affairs and public relations firm. Mr. Flaherty was nominated to serve as
a director of the Company because of his years of experience counseling
boards and senior management. In addition, his experience in insurance and
risk management enable him to assist the Board of Directors in performing
its risk oversight function. The number of shares of Common Stock
beneficially owned by Mr. Flaherty includes 4,000 shares of Common Stock
which are subject to currently exercisable stock options. |
|
(3) |
|
Mr.
Fulvio has been a member of Fulvio & Associates, LLP, Certified Public
Accountants (formerly Speer & Fulvio, LLP), since 1987. Mr. Fulvio was
nominated to serve as a director of the Company because of his strength in
the area of accounting, his knowledge of and experience with tax matters,
and his financial acumen. The number of shares of Common Stock
beneficially owned by Mr. Fulvio includes (i) 10,000 shares of Common
Stock which are subject to currently exercisable stock options, (ii) and
9,000 shares of Common Stock which are owned by Mr. Fulvio’s
spouse. |
|
(4) |
|
Mr.
Gladstein previously served as a director of the Company from 1990 to
1994. Mr. Gladstein is currently an independent investor and consultant.
From the beginning of 2000 to August 31, 2004, Mr. Gladstein was a Senior
Consultant at Soros Fund Management. He was Chief Operating Officer at
Soros Fund Management from 1985 until his retirement at the end of 1999.
In the past five years, Mr. Gladstein has also served as a director of
Cresud Inc. and Imergent, Inc. Mr. Gladstein was nominated to serve as a
director of the Company because of his financial and accounting expertise
and his years of experience providing strategic advisory services to
complex organizations. In addition, having been a member of the
compensation, audit and other committees of public company boards, Mr.
Gladstein is familiar with a full range of corporate and board functions.
The number of shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by Mr. Gladstein
includes 10,000 shares of Common Stock which are subject to currently
exercisable stock options. |
- 7
-
(5) |
|
Mr.
Goldman has served as the co-founder and Chief Executive Officer of
TextPower, Inc., which creates business solutions by using a proprietary
library of vertical market text messaging software, since February 17,
2009. From 1987 to February 17, 2009, Mr. Goldman served as founder and
principal of the Goldman Group, a company that works with Fortune 500
companies in developing and operating wireless systems. Mr. Goldman was
nominated to serve as a director of the Company because of his extensive
experience with global companies and strategic planning, as well as his
expertise in the technology field. The number of shares of Common Stock
beneficially owned by Mr. Goldman includes 4,000 shares of Common Stock
which are subject to currently exercisable stock options. |
|
(6) |
|
Mr.
Hermanson has been the principal and President of Mr. Christmas, Inc., a
wholesale merchandising company, for more than the last five years. Mr.
Hermanson was nominated to serve as a director of the Company because he
has extensive experience in management, strategic planning, as well as a
thorough knowledge of wholesale merchandising and international business
issues. The number of shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by Mr.
Hermanson includes 10,000 shares of Common Stock which are subject to
currently exercisable stock options. |
|
(7) |
|
Mr.
Karp has served on boards of four New York Stock Exchange companies and
many other corporations over the past fifty years. Mr. Karp’s corporate
experience includes: management at the highest level; corporate finance;
acquisitions; mergers; corporate organization and governance; shareholder
and investor relations; and investments. |
|
(8) |
|
Mr.
Christopher served as (i) Chief Operating Officer from October 25, 2007
until October 30, 2008, (ii) President of the Standard Products Division
from October 13, 2005 until October 25, 2007, and (iii) Vice President of
Sales-Standard Products Division of the Company for more than five years
prior to October 13, 2005. The number of shares of Common Stock
beneficially owned by Mr. Christopher includes (i) 181,694 shares of
Common Stock which are subject to currently exercisable stock options,
(ii) 900 shares of Common Stock owned jointly between Mr. Christopher and
his spouse and (iii) 25,000 shares of non-vested restricted
stock. |
|
(9) |
|
Mr.
Corman served as the Company’s Corporate Controller for more than five
years prior to October 28, 2004. The number of shares of Common Stock
beneficially owned by Mr. Corman includes 36,395 shares of Common Stock
which are subject to currently exercisable stock options. |
|
(10) |
|
Mr.
Hansen served as (i) Senior Vice President-Strategy and Industry Relations
from February 18, 2008 to May 18, 2009, (ii) as Vice
President-Administration and Operations, Standard Products Division from
October 24, 2005 to February 18, 2008, (iii) as Vice President-Marketing
and Product Line Strategy, Standard Products Division from February 24,
2003 to October 24, 2005, and prior thereto as Vice President-Marketing,
Standard Products Division. The number of shares of Common Stock
beneficially owned by Mr. Hansen includes (i) 19,881 shares of Common
Stock which are subject to currently exercisable stock options, (ii) 2,706
shares of Common Stock owned jointly between Mr. Hansen and his spouse,
and (iii) 6,000 shares of non-vested restricted
stock. |
- 8 -
(11) |
|
Mr.
Harris served (i) as Vice President and Chief Information Officer of the
Standard Products Division of the Company from October 13, 2005 until
December 19, 2006, (ii) as Vice President and Chief Information Officer of
the Company from July 5, 2000 until October 13, 2005, (iii) as Division
Manager of the Company’s Standard Products Division from May 1, 1997
through July 5, 2000 and (iv) as Controller, Standard Products Division,
from December 1995 to May 1, 1997. The number of shares of Common Stock
beneficially owned by Mr. Harris includes 35,168 shares of Common Stock
which are subject to currently exercisable stock options. |
|
(12) |
|
Mr.
Martin served (i) as Vice President-Operations, Standard Products Division
of the Company from November 20, 2006 to August 1, 2008, (ii) as Vice
President-Finance of the Company from October 28, 2004 to November 20,
2006, (iii) as Director of Corporate Finance of the Company from January
1, 2002 to October 28, 2004, (iv) as Manager of Corporate Finance of the
Company from January 1, 2001 to December 31, 2001, (v) as Manager of
Corporate Accounting of the Company from January 15, 1996 to December 31,
2000 and (vi) as a Manager and other positions in audit services with
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, a public accounting firm, from September 1989
to January 1996. The number of shares of Common Stock beneficially owned
by Mr. Martin includes 19,714 shares of Common Stock which are subject to
currently exercisable stock options. |
|
(13) |
|
Mr.
McKee served (i) as Vice President of the Company from February 11, 1999
until October 13, 2005, (ii) as Vice President-Business
Development/Investor Relations of the Company from December 14, 1995 to
February 11, 1999, (iii) as Treasurer of the Company from November 8, 1991
to December 14, 1995 and (iv) as Assistant Secretary of the Company from
August 28, 1991 to December 14, 1995. The number of shares of Common Stock
beneficially owned by Mr. McKee includes (i) 206,013 shares of Common
Stock which are subject to currently exercisable stock options, and (ii)
15,000 shares of non-vested restricted stock. |
|
(14) |
|
Mr.
Rourke served (i) as Vice President-Industrial Products Division of the
Company from December 14, 1995 to December 27, 2003, (ii) as Vice
President and General Manager- Industrial Products Division of the Company
from November 4, 1993 to December 14, 1995 and (iii) prior thereto as Vice
President and General Manager, Industrial Products, for Mueller Brass Co.
in Port Huron, Michigan. The number of shares of Common Stock beneficially
owned by Mr. Rourke includes (i) 119,802 shares of Common Stock which are
subject to currently exercisable stock options, and (ii) 10,000 shares of
non-vested restricted stock. |
|
(15) |
|
Mr.
Wilkerson served (i) as Of Counsel to the Memphis law firm of Pietrangelo
Cook, LLP from April 2002 to May 2005 and (ii) as Vice President and
General Counsel for Louisiana- Pacific Corporation from 1997 to January
2002. The number of shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by Mr.
Wilkerson includes 40,000 shares of Common Stock which are subject to
currently exercisable stock options. |
- 9 -
Meetings and Committees of the Board of
Directors
During 2009, the
Board of Directors held four meetings. The Board of Directors established a
standing Audit Committee and a Compensation Committee at its organizational
meeting on February 13, 1991. On May 13, 1991, the Board of Directors created
two committees (the “Plan Committees”) to be responsible for administering the
Company’s 1991 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and the Company’s 1991 Incentive
Stock Option Plan. On November 16, 1993, the Board of Directors established a
standing Nominating Committee. On May 12, 1994, the Board of Directors created
two committees to be responsible for administering the Company’s 1994 Stock
Option Plan and the Company’s 1994 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan, on
February 12, 1998 created a committee to be responsible for administering the
Company’s 1998 Stock Option Plan and on February 12, 2002 created a committee to
be responsible for administering the Company’s 2002 Stock Option Plan
(collectively, the “Option Plan Committees”). On February 12, 2004, the Board of
Directors changed the name of the Nominating Committee to the Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee. During 2009, no director attended fewer than 75%
of the total number of meetings of the Board and all committees on which he
served.
The Audit Committee
is composed of three directors who are not officers or employees of the Company:
Gennaro J. Fulvio (Chairman), Alexander P. Federbush and Gary S. Gladstein. Each
member of the Audit Committee has been determined by the Board of Directors to
meet the standards for independence required of audit committee members by the
New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) and applicable SEC rules. For more
information on the NYSE standards for independence, see “Corporate
Governance-Director Independence” in this Proxy Statement. The Board of
Directors has further determined that (i) all members of the Audit Committee are
financially literate and (ii) Gary S. Gladstein and Gennaro J. Fulvio each
possess accounting and related financial management expertise within the meaning
of the listing standards of the NYSE, and are each audit committee financial
experts within the meaning of applicable SEC rules. The Audit Committee (i)
appoints the Company’s independent accountants, (ii) reviews and approves any
major change in the Company’s accounting policies, (iii) reviews the scope and
results of the independent audit, (iv) reviews and considers the independence of
the accountants, (v) reviews the effectiveness of the Company’s internal audit
procedures and personnel, (vi) reviews the Company’s policies and procedures
- 10 -
for compliance with
disclosure requirements concerning conflicts of interest and the prevention of
unethical, questionable or illegal payments and (vii) makes such reports and
recommendations to the Board of Directors as it may deem appropriate. The Audit
Committee held six formal meetings during the last fiscal year, all of which
were attended by the Company’s independent auditors. At such meetings, the Audit
Committee discussed the scope and results of the annual audit and issues of
accounting policy and internal controls.
The Compensation Committee is composed of three
directors who are not officers or employees of the Company: Alexander P.
Federbush (Chairman), Paul J. Flaherty and Gary S. Gladstein. Each member of the
Compensation Committee has been determined by the Board of Directors to meet the
NYSE’s standards for independence. These same directors also serve as members of
the Plan Committee and the Option Plan Committees. The Compensation Committee
(i) provides assistance to the Board of Directors in discharging the Board of
Directors’ responsibilities relating to management organization, performance,
compensation and succession and (ii) makes such recommendations to the Board of
Directors as it deems appropriate. During the fiscal year 2009, the Compensation
Committee and the Option Plan Committee held three formal meetings.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is
composed of three directors who are not officers or employees of the Company:
Terry Hermanson (Chairman), Gennaro J. Fulvio and Scott J. Goldman. Each member
of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has been determined by the
Board of Directors to meet the NYSE’s standards for independence. The Nominating
and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for the recommendation to the
Board of Directors of director nominees for election to the Board of Directors.
In addition, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible
for recommending committee assignments and responsibilities to the Board of
Directors, overseeing the evaluation of Board of Directors and management
effectiveness, developing and recommending to the Board of Directors corporate
governance guidelines, and generally advising the Board of Directors on
corporate governance and related matters. The Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee held one formal meeting during fiscal year
2009.
The Board of Directors has utilized a leadership
structure for many years consisting of an Executive Chairman position and a
separate Chief Executive Officer position, both of whom served on the Board.
These officers were in constant contact
- 11 -
with the Executive Officers
and other key people of the Company. They provided advice and recommendations to
the full Board for the Board’s consideration. However, this long-time leadership
structure was impacted by the death of the CEO, Mr. William D. O’Hagan, in
October, 2008. At that time, the Board selected a new CEO, Mr. Gregory L.
Christopher, who is not presently on the Board. However, it is expected that the
Company will return to the structure in which both the Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer will be members of the Board.
The Board of Directors is actively involved in
oversight of risks that could affect the Company. The full Board of Directors
has retained the responsibility for general oversight of risks, but the Audit
Committee primarily oversees those risks that may directly or indirectly impact
the Company’s financial statements. The Board of Directors receives reports
directly from officers responsible for oversight of particular risks within the
Company, as well as full reports by the chair of the Audit Committee regarding
the Audit Committee’s considerations and actions. The Board believes that
through such open communication and access to information, it can sufficiently
manage the risks facing the Company. The Board of Director’s administration of
its risk oversight function has not affected the Board’s leadership
structure.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The Company operates within a comprehensive plan of
corporate governance for the purpose of defining independence, assigning
responsibilities, setting high standards of professional and personal conduct
and assuring compliance with such responsibilities and standards. The Company
regularly monitors developments in the area of corporate governance. In July
2002, Congress passed the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Sarbanes-Oxley”) which,
among other things, established, or provided the basis for, a number of new
corporate governance standards and disclosure requirements. In addition,
following the passage of Sarbanes-Oxley, the NYSE adopted changes to its
corporate governance and listing requirements.
Director Independence
The standards relied upon by the Board of Directors
in affirmatively determining whether a director is “independent,” in compliance
with the rules of the NYSE, are comprised, in part, of those objective standards
set forth in the NYSE rules, which generally provide that (a) a director who is
an employee, or whose immediate family member (defined as a spouse, parent,
child, sibling, father- and mother-in-law, son- and
- 12 -
daughter-in-law and anyone,
other than a domestic employee, sharing the director’s home) is an executive
officer of the Company, would not be independent for a period of three years
after termination of such relationship; (b) a director who has received, or
whose immediate family member has received, during any twelve-month period
within the last three years, more than $120,000 per year in direct compensation
from the Company, except for certain permitted payments, would not be
independent; (c) a director or an immediate family member who is a current
partner of a firm that is the Company’s internal or external auditor, a director
who is a current employee of such a firm, a director who has an immediate family
member who is a current employee of such a firm and who personally works on the
Company’s audit, or a director or an immediate family member who was within the
last three years (but is no longer) a partner or employee of such a firm and
personally worked on the Company’s audit within that time would not be
independent; (d) a director or an immediate family member who is, or has been
within the last three years, employed as an executive officer of another company
where any of the Company’s present executive officers at the same time serves or
served on the other company’s compensation committee would not be independent;
and (e) a director who is a current employee, or an immediate family member is a
current executive officer, of a company that has made payments to, or received
payments from, the Company for property or services in an amount which, in any
of the last three fiscal years, exceeds the greater of $1 million, or 2% of such
other company’s consolidated gross revenues, would not be independent. In
addition to these objective standards and in compliance with NYSE rules, no
director will be considered independent who has any other material relationship
with the Company that could interfere with the director’s ability to exercise
independent judgment. The Board of Directors exercises appropriate discretion in
identifying and evaluating the materiality of any relationships directors may
have with the Company.
The Board of Directors, in applying the
above-referenced standards and after considering all of the relevant facts and
circumstances, has affirmatively determined that the Company’s current
“independent” directors are: Alexander P. Federbush, Paul J. Flaherty, Gennaro
J. Fulvio, Gary S. Gladstein, Scott J. Goldman and Terry Hermanson. In the
course of the Board of Director’s determination regarding the independence of
each non-management director, the Board considered for:
- Mr. Flaherty, the fact that the Company
has utilized certain services of Aon and its affiliates, but recognizing the
arms’ length nature of such transactions, the absence of any managerial role
or specific pecuniary interest of Mr. Flaherty in such matters, and the de
minimis percentage such transactions represented in respect of the annual
revenues and assets of each of those companies; and
- 13 -
- Mr. Goldman, the fact that Mr. Goldman is
married to the niece of Harvey L. Karp, the Chairman of the Board, but
recognizing the distance of this relationship.
Independent Directors
- A majority of the members of the
Company’s Board of Directors have been determined to meet the NYSE’s standards
for independence. See “Director Independence” above.
- The Company’s Corporate Governance
Guidelines provide that the Company’s non-management directors shall hold
annually at least two formal meetings independent from management. The
non-management directors will choose a non-management director, as
appropriate, to preside at these executive sessions of the Board of
Directors.
Audit Committee
- All members of the Audit Committee have
been determined to meet the standards of independence required of audit
committee members by the NYSE and applicable SEC rules. See “Director
Independence” above.
- In accordance with the rules and
regulations of the SEC, the above paragraph regarding the independence of the
members of the Audit Committee shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material”
or to be “filed” with the SEC or subject to Regulation 14A or 14C of the
Exchange Act or to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act and shall
not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), or the Exchange
Act, notwithstanding any general incorporation by reference of this Proxy
Statement into any other filed document.
- The Board of Directors has determined
that all members of the Audit Committee are financially literate. Further, the
Board of Directors has determined that Gary S. Gladstein and Gennaro J. Fulvio
each possess accounting or related financial management expertise, within the
meaning of the listing standards of the NYSE, and are each audit committee
financial experts within the meaning of applicable SEC rules.
- Ernst & Young LLP, the Company’s
independent auditors, reports directly to the Audit Committee.
- 14 -
- The Audit Committee, consistent with the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the rules adopted thereunder, meets with
management and the Company’s independent auditors prior to the filing of
officers’ certifications with the SEC to receive information concerning, among
other things, significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting.
- The Audit Committee has adopted
procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints by Company
employees regarding the Company’s accounting, internal accounting controls or
auditing matters.
- The Audit Committee operates under a
formal charter adopted by the Board of Directors that governs its duties and
standards of performance. Copies of the charter can be obtained free of charge
from the Company’s website at www.muellerindustries.com or may be requested in
print by any shareholder.
Compensation Committee
- All members of the Compensation Committee
have been determined to meet the NYSE standards for independence. See
“Director Independence” above.
- The Compensation Committee operates under
a formal charter adopted by the Board of Directors that governs its duties and
standards of performance. Copies of the charter can be obtained free of charge
from the Company’s website at www.muellerindustries.com or may be requested in
print by any shareholder.
Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee
- All members of the Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee have been determined to meet the NYSE standards
for independence. See “Director Independence” above.
- The Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee recommends to the Board of Directors as director nominees
individuals of established personal and professional integrity, ability and
judgment, and who are chosen with the primary goal of ensuring that the entire
Board of Directors collectively serves the interests of the Company’s
stockholders. Due consideration is given to assessing the qualifications of
potential nominees and any potential conflicts with the Company’s interests.
The Nominating
- 15 -
and Corporate Governance Committee also assesses the
contributions of the Company’s incumbent directors in connection with their
potential re-nomination. In identifying and recommending director nominees, the
Committee members take into account such factors as they determine appropriate,
including recommendations made by the Board of Directors.
- Under its charter, which was revised in
February 2010, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers
whether the viewpoint, professional experience, education, skill and other
individual qualities and attributes of any potential nominee would contribute
to the diversity of the Board as a whole. In addition, when considering Board
diversity, the Committee will not exclude any potential Board nominee from
consideration based on age, gender, race, color of skin, ethnic origin,
political affiliation, religious preference, sexual orientation, country of
origin, physical handicaps or any other category.
- Once the Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee has identified prospective nominees, background
information is elicited about the candidates, following which they are
investigated, interviewed and evaluated by the Committee which then reports to
the Board of Directors.
- The Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee operates under a formal charter adopted by the Board of Directors
that governs its duties and standards of performance. Copies of the charter
can be obtained free of charge from the Company’s website at
www.muellerindustries.com or may be requested in print by any
shareholder.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
does not consider individuals nominated by stockholders for election to the
Board. However, under the Company’s Bylaws, nominations for the election of
directors may be made by a qualifying stockholder, but only if written notice of
such stockholder’s intent to make such nomination has been received by the
Secretary of the Company at the Company’s principal place of business (8285
Tournament Drive, Suite 150, Memphis, Tennessee 38125) not less than 60 days and
not more than (i) with respect to an election to be held at an annual meeting of
stockholders, 90 days prior to the anniversary date of the immediately preceding
annual meeting (unless the annual meeting date is advanced by more than thirty
days or delayed by more than sixty days, in which case different deadlines
apply) and (ii) with respect to an election to be held at a special meeting of
stockholders for the election of directors, not earlier
- 16 -
than 90 days prior to the
special meeting and not later than the later of (a) 60 days prior to such
special meeting or (b) the tenth day following the day on which public
announcement is first made of the date of the special meeting, provided that in
the event that the number of directors to be elected to the Board is increased
and there is no public announcement naming all of the nominees for director or
specifying the size of the increased Board made by the Company at least 70 days
prior to the first anniversary of the preceding year’s annual meeting, a
stockholder’s notice shall also be considered timely, but only with respect to
nominees for any new positions created by such increase, if it is delivered to
the Secretary of the Company not later than the tenth day following the day on
which such public announcement is first made by the Company. To be a qualifying
stockholder, the stockholder must be a stockholder of record at the time the
notice was delivered to the Secretary of the Company. Each such notice shall set
forth: (a) as to each person whom the stockholder proposes to nominate for
election or reelection as a director, all information relating to such person
that is required to be disclosed in solicitations of proxies for election of
directors, or is otherwise required, in each case pursuant to Regulation 14A (or
successor provisions) under the Exchange Act, including such person’s written
consent to be named in the proxy statement as a nominee and to serve as a
director if elected; (b) as to any other business that the stockholder desires
to be brought before the meeting, a brief description of the business desired to
be brought before the meeting, the reasons for conducting such business at the
meeting and any material interest in such business of such stockholder and the
beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf the proposal is made; and (c) as to
the stockholder giving the notice and the beneficial owner, if any, on whose
behalf the nomination or proposal is made (i) the name and address of such
stockholder, as they appear on the Company’s books, and of such beneficial owner
and (ii) the class and number of shares of Common Stock which are owned
beneficially and of record by such stockholder and such beneficial owner. The
presiding officer of the meeting may refuse to acknowledge the nomination of any
person not made in compliance with the foregoing procedure. See “Stockholder
Nominations for Board Membership and Other Proposals for 2011 Annual
Meeting.”
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider
Participation
During fiscal year 2009, Terry Hermanson, Paul J.
Flaherty and Gary S. Gladstein served on the Compensation Committee. No member
of the Compensation Committee was, during fiscal year 2009, an officer or
employee of the Company
- 17 -
or was formerly an officer
of the Company, except that Gary S. Gladstein served as Chief Financial Officer
of the Company from December 28, 1990 to February 13, 1991. In addition, no
member of the Compensation Committee, during fiscal year 2009, had any
relationship requiring disclosure by the Company as a related party transaction
under Item 404 of Regulation S-K. No executive officer of the Company served on
any board of directors or compensation committee of any other company for which
any of the Company’s directors served as an executive officer at any time during
fiscal year 2009.
Corporate Governance Guidelines
- The Company has adopted a set of
Corporate Governance Guidelines, including specifications for director qualification
and responsibility, director access to
officers and employees, director compensation, director orientation and continuing education and
the annual performance evaluation of
the Board of Directors.
- Copies of the guidelines can be obtained
free of charge from the Company’s website at www.muellerindustries.com or may be
requested in print by any
shareholder.
Code of Business Conduct and
Ethics
- The Company has adopted a Code of
Business Conduct and Ethics, which is
designed to help officers, directors and employees resolve ethical
issues in an increasingly complex
business environment. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is applicable to all of the
Company’s officers, directors and
employees, including the Company’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting
officer or controller and other
persons performing similar functions. The Code of Business Conduct
and Ethics covers topics, including but not
limited to, conflicts of interest, confidentiality of information and compliance with
laws and regulations.
- Waivers from the Code of Business Conduct
and Ethics are discouraged. Any
waivers from the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that relate to the Company’s directors and executive officers
must be approved by the Board of
Directors and will be posted on the Company’s website at www.muellerindustries.com.
- 18 -
- Copies of the Code of Business Conduct
and Ethics can be obtained free of
charge from the Company’s website at www.muellerindustries.com or may be requested in print by any
shareholder.
Policies and Procedures for Approval of Related Party
Transactions
Related party transactions may present potential or
actual conflicts of interest and create the appearance that Company decisions
are based on considerations other than the best interests of the Company and its
shareholders. Management carefully reviews all proposed related party
transactions (if any), other than routine banking transactions, to determine if
the transaction is on terms comparable to terms that could be obtained in an
arms-length transaction with an unrelated third party. Management reports to the
Audit Committee and then to the Board of Directors on all proposed material
related party transactions. Upon the presentation of a proposed related party
transaction to the Audit Committee or the Board, the related party is excused
from participation in discussion and voting on the matter.
Directors’ Attendance at Annual Meetings of
Stockholders
It is the policy of the Company’s Board of Directors
to expect that all directors attend annual meetings of stockholders except where
the failure to attend is due to unavoidable circumstances or conflicts discussed
in advance with the Chairman of the Board. All members of the Board of Directors
attended the Company’s 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
Communication With the Board of
Directors
Any stockholder or interested party who wishes to
communicate with the Board of Directors, or specific individual directors,
including the non-management directors as a group, may do so by directing a
written request addressed to such directors or director in care of the Chairman
of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, Mueller Industries, Inc.,
8285 Tournament Drive, Suite 150, Memphis, Tennessee 38125. Communication(s)
directed to members of the Board who are not non-management directors will be
relayed to the intended Board member(s) except to the extent that it is deemed
unnecessary or inappropriate to do so pursuant to the procedures established by
a majority of the independent directors. Communications directed to
non-management directors will be relayed to the intended Board member(s) except
to the extent that doing so would be contrary to the instructions of the
non-management directors. Any communication so withheld will nevertheless be
made available to any non-management director who wishes to review
it.
- 19 -
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS
Compensation Policies and
Objectives
The compensation programs for our executive officers,
including the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table for
2009 below, are designed to (i) motivate these key employees to achieve certain
strategic and financial goals and reward them for achieving such goals, (ii)
align the long-term financial interests of our named executive officers with
those of our stockholders, (iii) encourage these employees to continue their
service with our Company, and (iv) provide a means to attract additional
talented executive officers when necessary.
We believe in a pay for performance philosophy – that
the performance of our named executive officers in managing our Company,
considered in light of general economic and specific Company, industry, and
competitive conditions, should be the basis for determining the level and
composition of their compensation. This incentive element of total compensation
provides a significant portion of each named executive officer’s compensation
potential.
Determination of Compensation
Compensation for our Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer is determined by our Compensation Committee. Compensation
decisions for our other named executive officers are made by our Compensation
Committee based on the joint recommendations of our Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer. Our Compensation Committee meets at least annually to
determine the adjustments, if any, which will be made to all elements of
compensation, including base salary, annual bonus compensation, and long-term
equity awards.
In determining the levels of compensation, including
the amount of base salary increases from year to year, if any, the target levels
of the annual cash bonuses and the amounts payable thereby at the end of each
year, and the number of equity awards to be awarded and when such awards will be
granted, we generally do not rely on formulaic guidelines but rather maintain a
flexible compensation program that allows us to adapt components and levels of
compensation to motivate and reward individual executives within the context of
the Company’s desire to attain certain strategic and financial goals and control
compensation cost. This requires that we consider subjective factors including
(i) an executive’s performance against corporate objectives in recent years,
(ii) the value of the executive’s skills and capabilities
- 20 -
in supporting the long-term
performance of the Company, (iii) performance of each executive’s specific
management responsibilities, (iv) each executive’s contribution as a member of
the executive management team, and (v) whether each executive’s total
compensation potential and structure is sufficient to ensure the retention of
the executive when considering the compensation potential that may be available
elsewhere. As such, we make reasoned subjective determinations about
compensation levels. Our decisions regarding the various elements of
compensation are generally independent of one another in that the decisions we
make with respect to any one element do not necessarily affect decisions we make
with respect to any other element.
In making compensation decisions, our Compensation
Committee does not undertake any formal benchmarking or review any formal
surveys of compensation for our competitors but rather relies on the members’
general knowledge of our industry, supplemented by advice from our Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer based on their knowledge of our industry in markets in
which we participate.
The targets for annual bonus programs are generally
determined by the Compensation Committee in December for the upcoming year.
Various factors are considered when determining the specific targets including
estimated actual results for the fiscal year being concluded, the plan for the
upcoming year, economic conditions then currently prevailing as well as expected
in the upcoming year, among others.
Elements of Compensation
Our compensation program is composed of six elements:
(i) base salary, (ii) annual bonus compensation, (iii) long-term equity
incentive compensation, (iv) traditional welfare benefits, (v) perquisites, and
(vi) post-employment and change-in-control compensation.
Each element of compensation plays a part in our
overall compensation policies and objectives.
- We provide base salary and traditional
benefits such as group health, disability, and life insurance benefits, as well as
matching contributions to the Mueller
Industries, Inc. 401(k) Plan, as a means of providing a base level of compensation for services performed, to
encourage the continued service of our
named executive officers and to attract additional talented executive officers when necessary.
- 21 -
- We offer annual cash bonus compensation
to our named executive officers to
reward their success in attaining short-term operating objectives, such
as sales, operating earnings and earnings per
share. From time to time, we award
discretionary bonuses to recognize and reward individual performance regardless of corporate-wide
performance.
- Our long-term equity incentive
compensation rewards our named executive officers for achievement of our long-term financial
success as measured by our stock
price. As such, it aligns the financial interests of our named executive officers with our stockholders and
rewards our named executive officers
for increased stockholder value. Historically we have granted stock
options to our named executive officers,
although in 2009 we adopted, and our
shareholders approved, the 2009 Stock Incentive Plan which provides
for the grant of a variety of stock-based
awards. We generally grant stock options with ten-year terms that vest ratably over
a five-year period. This long-term
vesting schedule provides continued motivation and rewards executives in line with our stockholders over the
vesting period. Moreover, we generally
provide for periodic option grants to ensure that vesting periods will overlap and continue to provide
incentive and motivation over the
longer term. We also believe that stock options continue to provide long-term shareholder value beyond the
vesting dates because of the continued
upside financial potential for executives and the fact that stock options can be retained beyond the vesting
date without adverse tax consequences
to the executive. Because of the five-year vesting schedule, we regard our stock option program as a significant
factor in retaining our named
executive officers. In addition, in 2009 we granted shares of restricted stock to certain of our named executive
officers which vest either (i) 20% per
year on each of the first five anniversaries of the date of grant or (ii) 50% on each of the second and
third anniversaries of the date of
grant. As with stock options, we believe that these restricted stock
grants will incentivize our named executive
officers to achieve long-term financial success for the Company.
- We view our perquisites as an added
element of our executive compensation program designed to attract, retain and reward our
named executive officers.
- 22 -
- We provide employment agreements as a
reward for achieving a certain level
of seniority and accomplishments based on a subjective determination
of the executive’s past service and current
responsibilities. We believe that providing employment agreements at the top
executive level is generally in line
with market practice and allows us to be competitive and retain our
top executives.
Base Salary
Base salary adjustments are determined by making
reasoned subjective determinations about current economic conditions such as
general wage inflation as well as the executive’s qualifications, experience,
responsibilities, and past performance. For 2009, base salary increases ranged
from 6% to 34% for our named executive officers.
Annual Bonus Compensation
Each of our named executive officers participated in
one of two annual bonus programs. In 2009, Mr. Karp participated in the Annual
Bonus Plan that was approved by stockholders at the May 2005 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders. Our other named executive officers participated in the Company’s
Annual Incentive Plan as did other salaried employees.
Annual Bonus Plan. Early in 2009, the Compensation Committee
established a performance target for the year based upon EBITDA (earnings before
interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) subject to certain adjustments.
The Compensation Committee established graduated EBITDA targets that ranged from
$77 million (earning zero bonus) to $142 million (earning a 200% bonus) with a
maximum bonus of $2,500,000; the actual earned percentages applied to base
salary for determination of the award were linear for actual EBITDA results
between the graduated scale. Actual performance resulted in a 73% payment under
the plan for 2009. Although Mr. Karp was entitled to receive a bonus in the
amount of $1,098,600, he declined to accept the payment of his full bonus and
instead accepted a bonus equal to $598,600.
Annual Incentive Plan and Bonus
Awards. At the beginning of 2009,
our Compensation Committee adopted our 2009 Annual Incentive Plan. We designed
our 2009 Annual Incentive Plan to award cash bonuses for achievement of certain
corporate goals. We calculate the awards by multiplying the employee’s
- 23 -
actual base salary paid
during the year, by the employee’s incentive grade level factor, which in turn,
is multiplied by a consolidated company and/or operating unit performance factor
each of which was set by our Compensation Committee at the beginning of the
fiscal year. For 2009, the incentive grade level factors for all salaried
employees ranged from 7.5% to 100% and were approved by our Compensation
Committee based upon the recommendations of Mr. Christopher who based his
recommendations on a subjective determination of each individual employee’s past
performance and responsibilities. The incentive grade level factor for the named
executive officers was established at 100% for Messrs. Christopher, McKee, and
Rourke, and at 75% for Mr. Hansen. Based upon the recommendation of Mr.
Christopher, the Compensation Committee established operating income of $100
million subject to certain adjustments, as the consolidated company performance
factor for the 2009 Annual Incentive Plan, which includes Messrs. Christopher
and McKee, established $37 million subject to certain adjustments, as the
Industrial Products Division performance factor, which includes Mr. Rourke, and
established $90 million subject to certain adjustments, as the Standard Products
Division performance factor, which includes Mr. Hansen. The company and
operating unit performance factors are subject to increase by 2 percentage
points for each 1 percentage point that actual performance exceeds the target
(capped at 200% for Messrs. Christopher, McKee, and Rourke and capped at 150%
for Mr. Hansen), and decreased by 3 percentage points for each 1 percentage
point that actual performance is less than the target. For 2009, the payments
under the plan to Messrs. Christopher, McKee, and Hansen were zero, and for Mr.
Rourke was 29% (100% grade level factor times 29% performance
factor).
Long-Term Equity Incentive
Program
Stock Option Awards Granted in 2009.
In determining which named
executive officers will receive option awards and the size of these awards, our
Compensation Committee makes reasoned subjective determinations based upon the
prior performance of the named executive officers, the importance of retaining
their services, and the potential for their performance to help us attain our
long-term goals. There is no set formula for the granting of awards to
individual named executive officers. During fiscal year 2009, the named
executive officers received stock options to acquire an aggregate of 67,000
shares or 30% of the total options granted under the long-term equity incentive
program in fiscal 2009.
- 24 -
Timing of Option Grants. Stock option awards to our named executive
officers, other than our Chief Executive Officer, are typically granted annually
by our Compensation Committee based on the recommendations of our Chief
Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board. Stock option awards to our Chief
Executive Officer are granted annually based on the recommendations of our
Chairman of the Board.
Restricted Stock Awards Granted in
2009. As with stock options, in
determining which named executive officers should receive restricted stock
awards during 2009, and the size of these awards, our Compensation Committee
made reasoned subjective determinations based upon the performance of the named
executive officers, the importance of retaining their services, and their role
in helping us attain our long-term goals. There was no set formula for the
granting of awards to individual named executive officers. During fiscal year
2009, the named executive officers received restricted stock grants covering an
aggregate of 56,000 shares.
Other Compensation
The other compensation provided to our named
executive officers is composed of the Company’s matching contribution to the
Mueller Industries, Inc. 401(k) Plan (except for Mr. Karp) and various
perquisites. The perquisites we provided in fiscal 2009 were as follows: estate
and tax planning, certain club memberships, and personal use of our company
airplane.
Estate and tax planning is provided to certain named
executive officers to complement our various compensation elements for the
purpose of ensuring the named executive officers understand the complexity of
the long-term equity incentives and are thereby able to maximize the value of
such benefits. We provide certain club memberships in part to facilitate
networking with and entertainment of our business clients. Because of the nature
of such memberships, our named executive officers gain some personal benefits.
We maintain a company-owned airplane primarily to provide efficient
transportation to certain employees and customers for business travel. From time
to time, when our plane is not being used for business purposes, we allow
certain named executive officers to use the plane for personal travel. We also
maintain a company-owned boat. Our boat is primarily for the purpose of
entertaining business clients, and, as of October 2008, is used exclusively for
that purpose. From time to time in the past, when our boat was not being used
for business reasons, we allowed our Chief Executive Officer to use our boat for
personal reasons, but this was not the case during the 2009 fiscal
year.
- 25 -
Post-Employment and Change-in-Control
Compensation
We believe that providing employment agreements at
the top executive level is generally in line with market practice and allows us
to be competitive and retain our top executives. We have entered into employment
agreements with Messrs. Karp, Christopher and McKee. The agreements provide that
upon a resignation for “good reason” or termination without “cause” (as each is
defined in the employment agreements), the executive will be entitled to receive
his then current base salary and an annual bonus equal to the average annual
bonus actually paid in the immediately preceding three years for the remainder
of the term of the agreement, and all unvested stock option awards will
immediately vest. In addition, following any such termination, the Company will
continue to provide health and medical benefit coverage until the executive
reaches the age of 65 (or, in the case or Mr. Karp, for the remainder of the
term of employment). The agreements also provide that an executive may resign in
connection with a “change in control” (as defined in the employment agreements)
and that in such event they will be entitled to the same payments as discussed
above but the payments will be made in a lump sum within 30 days following such
termination. We provide this ability to resign following a change in control as
an added incentive and reward for the executives to remain employed through the
consummation of the change in control and to ensure the completion of such event
which should ultimately deliver value to our stockholders. Our employment
agreement with Mr. Christopher also provides us with a certain level of
protection against competition and solicitation of customers and employees if
his employment is terminated. These restrictive covenants exist to protect our
business, as Mr. Christopher has longstanding relationships with a number of our
customers. Finally, in the event that any “payment” (as defined in the
employment agreements) under the employment agreements would be subject to the
excise tax imposed by the “golden parachute” regulations under the Internal
Revenue Code, Messrs. Karp, McKee and Christopher would be entitled to a
gross-up payment from the Company to cover such taxes.
We have also entered into a consulting agreement with
Mr. Karp, which will become effective upon the termination of his employment,
provided such termination is not for cause or by reason of Mr. Karp’s death or
disability. The agreement provides that Mr. Karp will render consulting services
for a period of six years, during which period he will be prohibited from
competing with us. During the consulting period, Mr. Karp is entitled to receive
an annual consulting fee equal to two-thirds of his “final base compensation”
for the first four years of such
- 26 -
period and one-third of his
final base compensation for the last two years of such period. The final base
compensation is equal to the lesser of: (i) Mr. Karp’s highest annual cash
compensation (consisting of base salary and annual bonus) during the three-year
period from 2005 to 2007 and (ii) $2,000,000. In addition, during the consulting
period, Mr. Karp will be entitled to continue to participate in our health and
medical benefit plans. The purpose of this agreement is to provide us with
protection against competition from Mr. Karp and a transition period following
his termination of employment during which he will continue to provide limited
services and be available for consultation with respect to his unique industry
and Company specific knowledge as needed to allow a smooth transition with his
successor and minimize, to the extent possible, any succession difficulties. As
with the employment agreements described in the preceding paragraph, this
consulting agreement provides for a gross-up payment in the event that payments
under it would be subject to the excise tax imposed by the “golden parachute”
regulations under the Internal Revenue Code.
Tax and Accounting Impact
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code generally
disallows a tax deduction to public companies for compensation in excess of
$1,000,000 paid to each of our chief executive officer and our next four most
highly paid executive officers. Qualifying “performance-based compensation” is
not subject to this deduction limitation if certain requirements are met. In
December of 2004, our board of directors adopted the Mueller Industries, Inc.
Annual Bonus Plan, which was subsequently approved by our stockholders at our
Annual Meeting of Stockholders in May of 2005. Annual bonus awards paid under
this plan will qualify as performance-based compensation and thus will be fully
deductible by us. Taxable compensation pursuant to stock options granted under
our stock option plans will also qualify as performance-based compensation and
will be fully deductible by us at the time of exercise. Although the base salary
compensation paid to Mr. Karp exceeds $1,000,000 and the amount in excess
thereof is not deductible by us for tax purposes, we believe that the impact of
this is immaterial and necessary to adequately compensate Mr. Karp in light of
past and continuing contributions to our growth. We periodically review the
potential consequences of Section 162(m) with respect to compensatory elements.
In the future we may authorize other compensation payments to our named
executive officers that do not comply with the exemptions in Section 162(m) if
we judge that such payments are appropriate
- 27 -
and in the best interests of
the stockholders, after taking into consideration changing business conditions
and/or any specific executive’s particular circumstances. This is consistent
with our general compensation policy to remain flexible in order to address
business and/or financial challenges as they present themselves.
Other provisions of the Internal Revenue Code can
also affect compensation decisions. Under Sections 280G and 4999 of the Internal
Revenue Code, a 20% excise tax is imposed upon individuals who receive payments
upon a change in control to the extent the payments received by them exceed an
amount approximating three times their average annual compensation. A company
will also lose its tax deduction for such “excess” payments. In our employment
agreements with executive officers, we provide for tax “gross-up” payments to
cover the cost of this excise tax. We believe it is important that the effects
of these tax code provisions not negate the protections which we intend to
provide to executive officers in the event of a change in control.
- 28 -
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE FOR
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock |
|
Option |
|
Incentive Plan |
|
Change
in |
|
All Other |
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
Salary |
|
Bonus |
|
Awards |
|
Awards |
|
Compensation |
|
Pension |
|
Compensation |
|
Total |
Name and Principal Position
(a) |
|
(b) |
|
($)(c) |
|
($)(d) |
|
($)(e)(1) |
|
($)(f)(1) |
|
($)(g) |
|
($)(h) |
|
($)(i) |
|
($)(j) |
Harvey L. Karp |
|
2009 |
|
$ |
1,500,000 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
$ |
598,600 |
|
|
— |
|
$ |
21,538 |
(2) |
|
$ |
2,120,138 |
Chairman of the
Board |
|
2008 |
|
$ |
1,500,000 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
$ |
1,750,000 |
|
|
— |
|
$ |
49,501 |
|
|
$ |
3,299,501 |
|
|
2007 |
|
$ |
1,500,000 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
$ |
2,500,000 |
|
|
— |
|
$ |
40,733 |
|
|
$ |
4,040,733 |
Gregory L. Christopher |
|
2009 |
|
$ |
600,000 |
|
|
— |
|
$ |
606,250 |
|
$ |
191,400 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
$ |
60,826 |
(3) |
|
$ |
1,458,476 |
Chief Executive
Officer |
|
2008 |
|
$ |
445,000 |
|
$ |
250,000 |
|
|
— |
|
$ |
448,560 |
|
$ |
322,625 |
|
|
— |
|
$ |
49,130 |
|
|
$ |
1,515,315 |
|
|
2007 |
|
$ |
265,255 |
|
$ |
197,105 |
|
|
— |
|
$ |
399,315 |
|
$ |
437,621 |
|
|
— |
|
$ |
23,570 |
|
|
$ |
1,322,866 |
Kent A. McKee |
|
2009 |
|
$ |
360,000 |
|
|
— |
|
$ |
363,750 |
|
$ |
153,120 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
$ |
19,277 |
(4) |
|
$ |
896,147 |
Executive Vice President
and |
|
2008 |
|
$ |
300,000 |
|
$ |
157,500 |
|
|
— |
|
$ |
261,660 |
|
$ |
217,500 |
|
|
— |
|
$ |
16,684 |
|
|
$ |
953,344 |
Chief Financial
Officer |
|
2007 |
|
$ |
278,210 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
$ |
342,270 |
|
$ |
459,046 |
|
|
— |
|
$ |
21,084 |
|
|
$ |
1,100,610 |
James H. Rourke |
|
2009 |
|
$ |
265,000 |
|
|
— |
|
$ |
242,500 |
|
$ |
114,840 |
|
$ |
76,850 |
|
|
— |
|
$ |
11,906 |
(5) |
|
$ |
711,096 |
President–Industrial |
|
2008 |
|
$ |
250,000 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
$ |
224,280 |
|
$ |
396,875 |
|
|
— |
|
$ |
13,688 |
|
|
$ |
884,843 |
Products
Division |
|
2007 |
|
$ |
232,974 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
$ |
342,270 |
|
$ |
384,407 |
|
|
— |
|
$ |
12,179 |
|
|
$ |
971,830 |
John B. Hansen |
|
2009 |
|
$ |
238,500 |
|
|
— |
|
$ |
145,500 |
|
$ |
53,592 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
$ |
12,409 |
(6) |
|
$ |
450,001 |
President,
Manufacturing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operations
-Standard |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products
Division |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
____________________
(1) |
These columns
represent the aggregate grant date fair value of awards granted to our
named executive officers in 2009, determined under Financial Accounting
Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification 718. For information on
the valuation assumptions with respect to awards made, refer to Note 12 -
Stock-Based Compensation to the Company’s Consolidated Financial
Statements filed with its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 26, 2009. The amounts above reflect the Company’s aggregate
accounting expense for these awards and do not necessarily correspond to
the actual value that will be recognized by the named executive
officers. |
|
(2) |
Includes
perquisites consisting of a car allowance and a club
membership. |
|
(3) |
Includes personal
use of the Company’s aircraft (valued at $29,856, representing the
incremental cost incurred by the company to operate the aircraft), an
income tax gross-up and other perquisites consisting of a matching
contribution to the Company’s 401(k) Plan, club membership and personal
tax and estate planning. |
|
(4) |
Includes an
income tax gross-up and other perquisites consisting of a matching
contribution to the Company’s 401(k) Plan, club membership, personal tax
and estate planning, and reimbursement for Mr. McKee’s spouse’s travel to
Company functions. |
|
(5) |
Includes a
matching contribution to the Company’s 401(k) Plan and personal tax and
estate planning. |
|
(6) |
Includes a
matching contribution to the Company’s 401(k) Plan and personal tax and
estate planning. |
- 29 -
Salaries paid to our
named executive officers are set forth in the Summary Compensation Table for
2009. For 2009, salaries paid to our named executives accounted for the
following percentages of their total compensation: Mr. Karp (71%), Mr.
Christopher (41%), Mr. McKee (40%), Mr. Rourke (37%), and Mr. Hansen
(53%).
2009 GRANTS OF PLAN BASED AWARDS
TABLE
|
|
|
|
Estimated Possible
Payouts |
|
All Other |
|
All Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under Non-Equity
Incentive |
|
Stock |
|
Option |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan Awards (1) |
|
Awards: |
|
Awards: |
|
Exercise
or |
|
Closing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
Number of |
|
Base Price |
|
Price of |
|
Grant Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of |
|
Securities |
|
of Option |
|
Stock on |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock or |
|
Underlying |
|
Awards |
|
Grant |
|
of Stock |
|
|
Grant Date |
|
Threshold |
|
Target |
|
Maximum |
|
Units
(#) |
|
Options
(#) |
|
($/Sh) |
|
Date |
|
and Option |
Name (a) |
|
(b) |
|
($)(c) |
|
($)(d) |
|
($)(e) |
|
(i)(3) |
|
(j)(4) |
|
(k)(3) |
|
($/Sh) |
|
Awards
($) |
Harvey L. Karp |
|
— |
|
N/A(2) |
|
|
N/A |
(2) |
|
$ |
2,500,000 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Gregory L. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Christopher |
|
7/30/2009 |
|
N/A(2) |
|
$ |
600,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,200,000 |
|
25,000 |
|
25,000 |
|
|
$23.83 |
|
|
$ |
24.25 |
|
|
$ |
797,650 |
|
Kent A. McKee |
|
7/30/2009 |
|
N/A(2) |
|
$ |
360,000 |
|
|
$ |
720,000 |
|
15,000 |
|
20,000 |
|
|
$23.83 |
|
|
$ |
24.25 |
|
|
$ |
516,870 |
|
James H. Rourke |
|
7/30/2009 |
|
N/A(2) |
|
$ |
265,000 |
|
|
$ |
530,000 |
|
10,000 |
|
15,000 |
|
|
$23.83 |
|
|
$ |
24.25 |
|
|
$ |
357,340 |
|
John B. Hansen |
|
7/30/2009 |
|
N/A(2) |
|
$ |
178,875 |
|
|
$ |
268,313 |
|
6,000 |
|
7,000 |
|
|
$23.83 |
|
|
$ |
24.25 |
|
|
$ |
199,092 |
|
____________________
(1) |
Mr. Karp received
a cash bonus award under our Annual Bonus Plan based on achieving EBITDA,
subject to certain adjustments, within the targeted range of $77 million
to $142 million. Mr. Rourke received a cash bonus award under our 2009
Annual Incentive Plan. See our discussion of the Annual Bonus Plan and the
2009 Incentive Plan under the heading “Compensation Discussion and
Analysis-Annual Bonus Compensation” above for a more thorough discussion
of these plans. |
|
(2) |
Because of the
nature of the formulas for determining bonus compensation under both the
Annual Bonus Plan and the 2009 Annual Incentive Plan, there are no
threshold amounts. There are also no target amounts under the Annual Bonus
Plan. |
|
(3) |
Shares of
restricted stock will vest either (i) 20% per year on each of the first
five anniversaries of the date of grant or (ii) 50% on each of the second
and third anniversaries of the date of grant. |
|
(4) |
The per share
exercise price of the options was set at the fair market value of the
Company’s Common Stock on the grant date, which under the terms of the
2002 Stock Incentive Plan is the mean between the highest and lowest sales
prices of the Common Stock reported on the NYSE on the date immediately
prior to the grant date. The options will vest and become exercisable at
the rate of 20% of the underlying Common Stock per year on each of the
first five anniversaries of the grant date and will expire on the tenth
anniversary of the grant date. |
- 30 -
OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL 2009
YEAR-END
|
|
|
|
Option Awards (1) |
|
Stock Awards (2) |
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities |
|
Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
Market
Value |
|
|
|
|
Underlying |
|
Underlying |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares or |
|
of Shares or |
|
|
|
|
Unexercised |
|
Unexercised |
|
Option |
|
|
|
Units of Stock |
|
Units of Stock |
|
|
|
|
Options |
|
Options |
|
Exercise |
|
Option |
|
That Have |
|
That Have |
|
|
|
|
(#) |
|
(#) |
|
Price |
|
Expiration |
|
Not
Vested |
|
Not Vested |
|
|
|
|
Exercisable |
|
Un-exercisable |
|
($) |
|
Date |
|
(#) |
|
($) |
Name (a) |
|
Grant Date |
|
(b) |
|
(c) |
|
(e) |
|
(f) |
|
(g) |
|
(h) |
Harvey L. Karp |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
Gregory L. Christopher |
|
12/21/2000 |
|
7,780 |
|
— |
|
$ |
15.20 |
|
|
12/21/2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/06/2001 |
|
7,780 |
|
— |
|
$ |
18.70 |
|
|
11/06/2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/13/2002 |
|
15,561 |
|
— |
|
$ |
20.40 |
|
|
02/13/2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/10/2003 |
|
19,451 |
|
— |
|
$ |
16.62 |
|
|
02/10/2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/10/2004 |
|
31,122 |
|
— |
|
$ |
20.72 |
|
|
02/10/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/23/2005 |
|
16,000 |
|
4,000 |
|
$ |
31.22 |
|
|
02/23/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/28/2005 |
|
27,000 |
|
18,000 |
|
$ |
28.04 |
|
|
12/28/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
07/28/2006 |
|
18,000 |
|
12,000 |
|
$ |
35.05 |
|
|
07/28/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
07/27/2007 |
|
14,000 |
|
21,000 |
|
$ |
36.91 |
|
|
07/27/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
07/25/2008 |
|
12,000 |
|
48,000 |
|
$ |
26.49 |
|
|
07/25/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
07/30/2009 |
|
— |
|
25,000 |
|
$ |
23.83 |
|
|
07/30/2019 |
|
25,000 |
|
$ |
606,250 |
|
Kent A. McKee |
|
12/21/2000 |
|
5,977 |
|
— |
|
$ |
15.20 |
|
|
12/21/2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/06/2001 |
|
15,561 |
|
— |
|
$ |
18.70 |
|
|
11/06/2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/13/2002 |
|
19,451 |
|
— |
|
$ |
20.40 |
|
|
02/13/2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/10/2003 |
|
31,122 |
|
— |
|
$ |
16.62 |
|
|
02/10/2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/10/2004 |
|
38,902 |
|
— |
|
$ |
20.72 |
|
|
02/10/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/23/2005 |
|
20,000 |
|
5,000 |
|
$ |
31.22 |
|
|
02/23/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/28/2005 |
|
27,000 |
|
18,000 |
|
$ |
28.04 |
|
|
12/28/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
07/28/2006 |
|
15,000 |
|
10,000 |
|
$ |
35.05 |
|
|
07/28/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
07/27/2007 |
|
12,000 |
|
18,000 |
|
$ |
36.91 |
|
|
07/27/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
07/25/2008 |
|
7,000 |
|
28,000 |
|
$ |
26.49 |
|
|
07/25/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
07/30/2009 |
|
— |
|
20,000 |
|
$ |
23.83 |
|
|
07/30/2019 |
|
15,000 |
|
$ |
363,750 |
|
James H. Rourke |
|
12/21/2000 |
|
3,113 |
|
— |
|
$ |
15.20 |
|
|
12/21/2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/06/2001 |
|
4,668 |
|
— |
|
$ |
18.70 |
|
|
11/06/2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/13/2002 |
|
12,449 |
|
— |
|
$ |
20.40 |
|
|
02/13/2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/10/2003 |
|
18,674 |
|
— |
|
$ |
16.62 |
|
|
02/10/2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/10/2004 |
|
24,898 |
|
— |
|
$ |
20.72 |
|
|
02/10/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/23/2005 |
|
16,000 |
|
4,000 |
|
$ |
31.22 |
|
|
02/23/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
07/28/2006 |
|
18,000 |
|
12,000 |
|
$ |
35.05 |
|
|
07/28/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
07/27/2007 |
|
12,000 |
|
18,000 |
|
$ |
36.91 |
|
|
07/27/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
07/25/2008 |
|
6,000 |
|
24,000 |
|
$ |
26.49 |
|
|
07/25/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
07/30/2009 |
|
— |
|
15,000 |
|
$ |
23.83 |
|
|
07/30/2019 |
|
10,000 |
|
$ |
242,500 |
|
- 31 -
|
|
|
|
Option Awards (1) |
|
Stock Awards (2) |
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities |
|
Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
Market
Value |
|
|
|
|
Underlying |
|
Underlying |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares or |
|
of Shares or |
|
|
|
|
Unexercised |
|
Unexercised |
|
Option |
|
|
|
Units of Stock |
|
Units of Stock |
|
|
|
|
Options |
|
Options |
|
Exercise |
|
Option |
|
That Have |
|
That Have |
|
|
|
|
(#) |
|
(#) |
|
Price |
|
Expiration |
|
Not
Vested |
|
Not Vested |
|
|
|
|
Exercisable |
|
Un-exercisable |
|
($) |
|
Date |
|
(#) |
|
($) |
Name (a) |
|
Grant Date |
|
(b) |
|
(c) |
|
(e) |
|
(f) |
|
(g) |
|
(h) |
John B. Hansen |
|
02/13/2002 |
|
1,556 |
|
— |
|
$ |
20.40 |
|
|
02/13/2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/10/2003 |
|
2,490 |
|
— |
|
$ |
16.62 |
|
|
02/10/2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/10/2004 |
|
3,735 |
|
— |
|
$ |
20.72 |
|
|
02/10/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/23/2005 |
|
3,200 |
|
800 |
|
$ |
31.22 |
|
|
02/23/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
07/28/2006 |
|
4,500 |
|
3,000 |
|
$ |
35.05 |
|
|
07/28/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
07/27/2007 |
|
2,400 |
|
3,600 |
|
$ |
36.91 |
|
|
07/27/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
07/25/2008 |
|
1,200 |
|
4,800 |
|
$ |
26.49 |
|
|
07/25/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
07/30/2009 |
|
— |
|
7,000 |
|
$ |
23.83 |
|
|
07/30/2019 |
|
6,000 |
|
$ |
145,500 |
|
____________________
(1) |
The options
reflected will vest and become exercisable at the rate of 20% of the
underlying Common Stock per year on each of the first five anniversaries
of the grant date and will expire on the tenth anniversary of the grant
date. |
|
(2) |
Shares of
restricted stock will vest either (i) 20% per year on each of the first
five anniversaries of the date of grant or (ii) 50% on each of the second
and third anniversaries of the date of
grant. |
2009 OPTION EXERCISES
|
|
Option Awards |
|
|
Number of |
|
Value |
|
|
Shares Acquired |
|
Realized |
|
|
on Exercise |
|
on Exercise |
Name (a) |
|
(#)(b) |
|
($)(c) |
Harvey L. Karp |
|
— |
|
— |
Gregory L. Christopher |
|
15,561 |
|
$48,483 |
Kent A. McKee |
|
17,363 |
|
$71,161 |
James H. Rourke |
|
4,526 |
|
$10,093 |
John B. Hansen |
|
— |
|
— |
- 32 -
Employment and Consulting Agreements
Employment Agreements
Harvey L.
Karp
We are party to an amended and restated employment
agreement with Mr. Karp. The term of the agreement ends on December 31, 2010,
and will automatically extend for successive one year terms thereafter, unless
Mr. Karp gives us at least 4 months’ prior written notice of his intention not
to renew the term, or we give Mr. Karp at least 4 months’ prior written notice
of our intention not to renew the term. The agreement provides that Mr. Karp
will serve as Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company. Under the terms
of the agreement, Mr. Karp is entitled to receive an annual base salary of at
least $606,373 (to be adjusted upward annually at a rate at least commensurate
with increases granted to other key executives) and a performance-based cash
bonus under the terms and conditions of the Annual Bonus Plan. Mr. Karp is also
entitled to receive reimbursement for reasonable business and travel expenses
incurred in the performance of his duties and is also entitled to participate in
all bonus, incentive, stock option, pension, disability and health plans and
programs and all fringe benefit plans maintained by the Company in which senior
executives participate.
Mr. Karp’s employment may be terminated by the
Company without cause or by Mr. Karp for good reason upon appropriate written
notice. In either such event, Mr. Karp will continue to receive his then-current
base salary as if his employment had continued for the remainder of the
then-current term and an annual bonus for the remainder of the then-current term
equal to the average bonus for the three calendar years immediately preceding
the written notice of termination. In addition, all outstanding unvested Company
stock options then held by Mr. Karp will immediately vest and become exercisable
and Mr. Karp will continue to participate in our health plans and programs at
his expense for the remainder of the term of employment. In addition, we will
pay Mr. Karp an amount equal to the monthly cost of continuation coverage under
COBRA for the remainder of the term of employment.
Mr. Karp may resign voluntarily without good reason
upon appropriate written notice. In such event, Mr. Karp will be entitled to
receive any accrued but unpaid base salary and, at the Company’s discretion, a
bonus for the calendar year in which his resignation without good reason occurs.
The Company may terminate
- 33 -
Mr. Karp’s employment for
cause upon appropriate written notice. In addition, if Mr. Karp’s employment is
terminated for cause or if Mr. Karp voluntarily resigns for any reason other
than good reason, his right to receive his base salary, bonus and any other
compensation and benefits to which he would otherwise be entitled under the
agreement shall be forfeited as of the date of termination. Mr. Karp may resign
his employment for any reason following a change in control. In such event, the
Company will pay to Mr. Karp a lump sum amount equal to (i) his then-current
base salary multiplied by the number of full and partial years remaining in the
term of employment and (ii) his average annual bonus for the three calendar
years immediately preceding the date of termination multiplied by the number of
full and partial years remaining in the term of employment. In addition, all
outstanding unvested options then held by Mr. Karp shall become immediately
exercisable. In the event that any payment becomes subject to the excise tax
imposed by the “golden parachute” regulations under the Internal Revenue Code,
Mr. Karp is entitled to a gross-up payment from the Company to cover such
taxes.
Gregory L.
Christopher
We are party to an amended and restated employment
agreement with Gregory L. Christopher, our Chief Executive Officer. The
agreement contains a rolling three-year term, which is automatically extended so
that the unexpired term on any date is always three years, unless either party
gives written notice of his or its intention not to extend the term. The
agreement entitles Mr. Christopher to an annual base salary of $600,000 and a
discretionary cash incentive bonus in an amount consistent with the executive
bonus program which the Company establishes for other key executives. In
addition, Mr. Christopher is entitled to receive reimbursement for reasonable
business and travel expenses incurred in the performance of his duties and will
participate in all bonus, incentive, stock option, pension, disability and
health plans and programs and all fringe benefit plans maintained by the Company
in which senior executives participate. The terms of Mr. Christopher’s
employment agreement relating to the compensation and benefits to which he is
entitled upon various terminations of employment (including gross-up payments)
are identical to those contained in Mr. Karp’s employment agreement, described
above, except that Mr. Christopher is entitled to continued participation in the
Company’s benefit plans following a qualifying termination of employment until
age 65. Mr. Christopher’s employment agreement also subjects him to
non-competition and non-solicitation covenants during the term of employment and
ending on the 12-month anniversary
- 34 -
following any termination of
employment. Generally, the non-competition covenant prevents Mr. Christopher
from engaging in activities that are competitive with the business of the
Company in any geographic area in which the Company does business and the
non-solicitation covenant prevents Mr. Christopher from soliciting or hiring any
person who was a full-time employee of the Company during the 24-month period
preceding the termination of his employment. Mr. Christopher’s employment
agreement also contains standard confidentiality provisions.
Kent A.
McKee
The Company is party to an employment agreement with
Kent A. McKee, the Company’s Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer. The agreement provides that Mr. McKee will serve as Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of the Company (Mr. McKee was subsequently appointed
Executive Vice President on October 13, 2005) for a rolling three-year term. The
agreement entitles Mr. McKee to receive an annual base salary of $240,000 (to be
adjusted upward annually at a rate commensurate with increases granted to other
key executives) and a discretionary cash incentive bonus consistent with the
executive bonus program which the Company establishes for other key executives.
In addition, Mr. McKee is to receive reimbursement for reasonable business and
travel expenses incurred in the performance of his duties and will participate
in all bonus, incentive, stock option, pension, disability and health plans and
programs and all fringe benefit plans maintained by the Company in which senior
executives participate. The terms of Mr. McKee’s employment agreement relating
to the compensation and benefits to which he is entitled upon various
terminations of employment (including gross-up payments) are identical to those
contained in Mr. Karp’s employment agreement, described above, except that Mr.
McKee is entitled to continued participation in the Company’s benefit plans
following a qualifying termination of employment until age 65.
The Company does not have any other employment
agreements with named executive officers. Except as set forth above, the Company
has no compensatory plan or arrangement with respect to any named executive
officer which would result in severance or change in control payments in excess
of $100,000.
- 35
-
Consulting Agreement
We are also party to an amended and restated
consulting agreement with Mr. Karp. The term of Mr. Karp’s consulting agreement
will begin upon the termination of his employment, provided such termination is
not for cause or by reason of Mr. Karp’s death or disability, and will end on
the sixth anniversary of such commencement. During his consulting period, Mr.
Karp will serve as independent consultant and advisor to the Company on matters
within his areas of expertise and for which he had responsibility during his
employment with the Company, provided that he will have not to devote more than
twenty hours per month to consulting service during the first four years of his
consulting period nor more than ten hours per month during the last two years of
his consulting period. In addition, during his consulting period, Mr. Karp
agrees not to engage in competitive activity (as defined in the consulting
agreement).
As compensation, Mr. Karp will be entitled to receive
an annual consulting fee equal to (i) two-thirds of his final base compensation
for the first four years of the consulting period and one-third of his final
base compensation for the last two years of such period. The final base
compensation for Mr. Karp is the lesser of: (i) his highest annual cash
compensation (consisting of base salary and annual bonus) during the three-year
period from 2005 to 2007 and (ii) $2,000,000. In addition, during the consulting
period, Mr. Karp will be entitled to continue to participate in our health and
medical benefit plans provided he bears the full cost of such participation, and
the Company will pay to him an amount equal to his monthly cost of continuation
coverage under COBRA for each month during the consulting period.
In the event that during the consulting period Mr.
Karp’s consulting relationship is terminated by the Company without cause or Mr.
Karp terminates his consulting relationship for good reason, the Company is
required to make a lump sum severance payment equal to the balance of all
amounts that would have been payable under the consulting agreement for the
remainder of the consulting period. Such lump sum amount will be discounted for
present value. In addition, in such event, the Company will continue to provide
the other benefits that would have been provided under the consulting agreement
for the remainder of the consulting period. In the event that any payment would
be subject to the excise tax imposed by the “golden parachute” regulations under
the Internal Revenue Code, Mr. Karp will be entitled to a gross-up payment from
the Company to cover such taxes.
- 36 -
POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UNDER EMPLOYMENT AND CONSULTING
AGREEMENTS AS OF THE END OF 2009
|
|
Termination Without
Cause |
|
|
Change in Control |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salary & |
|
|
|
|
of Stock |
|
Consulting |
|
Salary & |
|
|
|
|
of Stock |
|
Consulting |
|
|
Bonus |
|
Benefits |
|
Options |
|
Agreement |
|
Bonus |
|
Benefits |
|
Options |
|
Agreement |
Name (a) |
|
($)(b) |
|
($)(c) |
|
($)(d) |
|
($)(e) |
|
($)(f) |
|
($)(g) |
|
($)(h) |
|
($)(i) |
Harvey L. Karp |
|
$ |
3,116,200 |
|
$ |
34,721 |
|
|
— |
|
|
$ |
6,666,667 |
|
|
$ |
3,116,200 |
|
$ |
34,721 |
|
|
— |
|
|
$ |
6,622,865 |
|
Gregory L. Christopher |
|
$ |
3,007,400 |
|
$ |
347,965 |
|
$ |
41,625 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
$ |
3,007,400 |
|
$ |
347,965 |
|
$ |
41,625 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Kent A. McKee |
|
$ |
1,914,046 |
|
$ |
327,496 |
|
$ |
33,300 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
$ |
1,914,046 |
|
$ |
327,496 |
|
$ |
33,300 |
|
|
|
— |
|
James H. Rourke |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
John B. Hansen |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
2009 DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonqualified |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earned |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity |
|
Deferred |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or Paid |
|
Stock |
|
Option |
|
Incentive
Plan |
|
Compensation |
|
All Other |
|
|
|
|
|
in
Cash |
|
Awards |
|
Awards |
|
Compensation |
|
Earnings |
|
Compensation |
|
Total |
Name (a) |
|
($)(b) |
|
($)(c) |
|
($)(d) |
|
($)(e) |
|
(f) |
|
($)(g) |
|
($)(h) |
Alexander P. Federbush |
|
$59,500 |
|
— |
|
$13,111 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
$ |
72,611 |
Paul J. Flaherty |
|
$49,750 |
|
— |
|
$13,111 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
$ |
62,861 |
Gennaro J. Fulvio |
|
$63,000 |
|
— |
|
$13,111 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
$ |
76,111 |
Gary S. Gladstein |
|
$55,750 |
|
— |
|
$13,111 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
$ |
68,861 |
Scott J. Goldman |
|
$49,000 |
|
— |
|
$13,111 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
$ |
62,111 |
Terry Hermanson |
|
$54,750 |
|
— |
|
$13,111 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
$ |
67,861 |
During the 2009
fiscal year, directors of the Company who were not employed by the Company
received an annual fee for serving on the Company’s Board of Directors of
$45,000, plus a fee of $1,000 per Board and $750 per Audit, Compensation or
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee meeting attended by such director,
plus reimbursement for such director’s expenses incurred in connection with any
such Board or Committee meeting, and each Committee fee was paid whether or not
such committee meeting was held in conjunction with a Board of Directors
meeting. In addition, the Chairman of the Audit Committee received an annual fee
of $5,000 while the Chairman of each of the Compensation and Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committees received an annual fee of $3,000.
- 37 -
Under the Company’s 1994 Non-Employee Director Stock
Option Plan, each member of the Company’s Board of Directors who is neither an
employee nor an officer of the Company is automatically granted each year on the
date of the Company’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders, without further action by
the Board, an option to purchase 2,000 shares of Common Stock at the fair market
value of the Common Stock on the date the option is granted. As of March 9,
2010, options to purchase 48,000 shares of Common Stock were outstanding under
the Company’s 1994 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan.
REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
OF THE BOARD OF
DIRECTORS(1)
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors
oversees the Company’s financial reporting process on behalf of the Board of
Directors. Management has the primary responsibility for the financial
statements and the reporting process including the systems of internal controls.
In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Audit Committee reviewed the
audited financial statements in the Annual Report on Form 10-K with management,
including a discussion of the quality, not just the acceptability, of the
accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant judgments and the
clarity of disclosures in the financial statements.
The Audit Committee reviewed with the independent
auditors, who are responsible for expressing an opinion on the conformity of
those audited financial statements with generally accepted accounting
principles, their judgments as to the quality, not just the acceptability, of
the Company’s accounting principles and such other matters as are required to be
discussed with the Audit Committee by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 114,
The Auditor’s Communication With Those Charged With Governance, as currently in
effect. In addition, the Audit Committee discussed with the independent auditors
the auditors’ independence from management and the Company, including the
matters in the written disclosures required by Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board’s Rule 3526, and considered the compatibility of non-audit
services provided by the independent auditors with the auditor’s
independence.
The Audit Committee discussed with the Company’s
internal and independent auditors the overall scope and plans for their
respective audits. The Audit Committee meets with the internal and independent
auditors, with and without management present, to discuss the results of their
examinations, their evaluations of the Company’s internal controls, and the
overall quality of the Company’s financial reporting.
- 38 -
In reliance on the reviews and discussions referred
to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors (and the
Board of Directors has approved) that the audited financial statements be
included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
26, 2009 for filing with the SEC. The Audit Committee and the Board has
re-appointed, subject to shareholder approval, Ernst & Young LLP,
independent auditors, to audit the consolidated financial statements of the
Company for the fiscal year ending December 25, 2010.
The Audit Committee is governed by a formal charter
which can be accessed from the Company’s website at www.muellerindustries.com or
may be requested in print by any shareholder. The members of the Audit Committee
are considered independent because they satisfy the independence requirements
for Board members prescribed by the NYSE listing standards and Rule 10A-3 of the
Exchange Act.
Gennaro J. Fulvio,
Chairman |
Alexander P.
Federbush |
Gary S.
Gladstein |
____________________
(1) |
|
This Section is
not “soliciting material,” is not deemed “filed” with the SEC and is not
to be incorporated by reference in any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act or the Exchange Act, whether made before or after the date
hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language in any such
filing. |
REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
OF THE BOARD
OF DIRECTORS
ON
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed
with the Company’s management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required
by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K. Based on such review and discussions, the
Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the
Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy
Statement.
|
Alexander P. Federbush, Chairman |
|
Paul J.
Flaherty |
|
Gary S.
Gladstein |
- 39 -
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN
INFORMATION
The following table discloses information regarding
the securities to be issued and the securities remaining available for issuance
under the Registrant’s stock-based incentive plans as of December 26, 2009
(shares in thousands):
|
|
|
(a) |
|
|
|
(b) |
|
|
(c) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
remaining |
|
|
Number of |
|
Weighted |
|
available for |
|
|
securities to |
|
average |
|
future issuance |
|
|
be issued upon |
|
exercise price |
|
under equity |
|
|
exercise of |
|
of outstanding |
|
compensation |
|
|
outstanding |
|
options, |
|
plans (excluding |
|
|
options, warrants, |
|
warrants, and |
|
securities reflected |
Plan category |
|
and rights |
|
rights |
|
in column (a)) |
Equity compensation plans approved
by |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
security holders |
|
|
1,604 |
|
|
|
$27.56 |
|
|
|
992 |
|
Equity compensation plans not approved |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by security holders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1,604 |
|
|
|
$27.56 |
|
|
|
992 |
|
|
APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM
Ernst & Young LLP (“E&Y”) has been
reappointed by the Audit Committee to audit and certify the Company’s financial
statements for the fiscal year ending December 25, 2010, subject to ratification
by the Company’s stockholders. Ratification of the appointment of the Company’s
independent registered public accounting firm requires the affirmative vote of a
majority of the outstanding shares of the Company present in person or by proxy
at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote thereon. If the appointment of
E&Y is not ratified by the stockholders at the Annual Meeting, the Audit
Committee will reconsider its action and will appoint auditors for the 2010
fiscal year without further stockholder action. Further, even if the appointment
is ratified by stockholder action, the Audit Committee may at any time in the
future in its discretion reconsider the appointment without submitting the
matter to a vote of stockholders. It is expected that representatives of E&Y
will be in attendance at the Annual Meeting and will be available to answer
questions and to make a statement if they desire to do so.
- 40 -
The following table sets forth fees for professional
services rendered by E&Y for the audit of the Company’s annual financial
statements for each of the two fiscal years ended December 26, 2009 and December
27, 2008 and fees for other services rendered by E&Y during those
periods:
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Audit Fees |
$ |
2,141,904 |
|
$ |
1,965,965 |
Audit-Related Fees |
|
69,000 |
|
|
262,714 |
Tax Fees |
|
562,551 |
|
|
374,676 |
All Other Fees |
|
3,625 |
|
|
2,710 |
|
$ |
2,777,080 |
|
$ |
2,606,065 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audit Fees consist of fees for professional services
rendered for the audit of the Company’s consolidated annual financial statements
and review of the interim consolidated financial statements included in
quarterly reports and services that are normally provided by E&Y in
connection with statutory filings. Audit Fees also includes fees for
professional services rendered for the audits of internal control over financial
reporting in 2009 and 2008.
Audit-Related Fees include fees billed for
consultation on certain accounting matters and, in 2008, audits of employee
benefit plans.
Tax Fees include fees billed for tax compliance, tax
advice and tax planning matters.
The Audit Committee’s policy is to pre-approve all
audit and non-audit services provided by the independent auditors. These
services may include audit services, audit-related services, tax services and
other services. Pre-approval is generally provided for up to one year and any
pre-approval is detailed as to the particular service or category of services.
The Audit Committee has delegated pre-approval authority to its Chairman when
expedition of services is necessary. The independent auditors and management are
required periodically to report to the full Audit Committee regarding the extent
of services provided by the independent auditors in accordance with this
pre-approval, and the fees for the services performed to date. All of the
services provided by the independent auditors during fiscal 2009 and 2008,
respectively, under the categories Audit Fees, Audit-Related Fees, Tax Fees and
All Other Fees described above were pre-approved.
- 41 -
STOCKHOLDER NOMINATIONS FOR BOARD MEMBERSHIP
AND
OTHER PROPOSALS FOR 2011 ANNUAL MEETING
It is anticipated that the next Annual Meeting after
the one scheduled for May 6, 2010 will be held on or about May 5, 2011. The
Company’s Bylaws require that, for nominations of directors or other business to
be properly brought before an Annual Meeting, written notice of such nomination
or proposal for other business must be furnished to the Company. Such notice
must contain certain information concerning the nominating or proposing
stockholder and information concerning the nominee and must be furnished by the
stockholder (who must be entitled to vote at the meeting) to the Secretary of
the Company, in the case of the Annual Meeting to be held in 2011, no earlier
than February 5, 2011 and no later than March 7, 2011. A copy of the applicable
provisions of the Bylaws may be obtained by any stockholder, without charge,
upon written request to the Secretary of the Company at the address set forth
below.
In addition to the foregoing, and in accordance with
the rules of the SEC, in order for a stockholder proposal, relating to a proper
subject, to be considered for inclusion in the Company’s proxy statement and
form of proxy relating to the Annual Meeting to be held in 2011, such proposal
must be received by the Secretary of the Company by November 24, 2010 in the
form required under and subject to the other requirements of the applicable
rules of the SEC. If the date of the Annual Meeting to be held in 2011 is
changed to a date more than 30 days earlier or later than May 6, 2011, the
Company will inform the stockholders in a timely fashion of such change and the
date by which proposals of stockholders must be received for inclusion in the
proxy materials. Any such proposal should be submitted by certified mail, return
receipt requested, or other means, including electronic means, that allow the
stockholder to prove the date of delivery.
OTHER MATTERS TO COME BEFORE THE ANNUAL
MEETING
If any matter not described herein should properly
come before the Annual Meeting, the persons named in the proxy will vote the
shares represented by them as they deem appropriate. At the date of this Proxy
Statement, the Company knew of no other matters which might be presented for
stockholder action at the Annual Meeting.
- 42 -
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP COMPLIANCE
REPORTING
Based solely upon its review of Forms 3 and 4
received by it and written representations from certain reporting persons that
no Forms 5 were required for those persons, the Company believes that during
2009 all filing requirements applicable to its officers, directors and ten
percent stockholders were complied with.
OTHER INFORMATION
Consolidated financial statements for the Company are
included in the Annual Report to Stockholders for the year ended December 26,
2009 that accompanies this Proxy Statement. These financial statements are also
on file with the SEC, 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549 and with the
NYSE. The Company’s SEC filings are also available at the Company’s website at
www.muellerindustries.com or the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
A
COPY OF THE COMPANY’S ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K AS FILED FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 26, 2009 (EXCLUDING EXHIBITS) OR, AS NOTED HEREIN, ANY OF THE COMPANY’S
BOARD COMMITTEE CHARTERS, CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES, OR CODE OF ETHICS
WILL BE FURNISHED, WITHOUT CHARGE, BY WRITING TO GARY C. WILKERSON, SECRETARY,
MUELLER INDUSTRIES, INC., AT THE COMPANY’S PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS (8285
TOURNAMENT DRIVE, SUITE 150, MEMPHIS, TENNESSEE 38125). UPON RECEIPT BY WRITING
TO THE FOREGOING ADDRESS, THE COMPANY WILL ALSO FURNISH ANY OTHER EXHIBIT OF THE
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K UPON ADVANCE PAYMENT OF THE REASONABLE OUT-OF-POCKET
EXPENSES OF THE COMPANY RELATED TO THE COMPANY’S FURNISHING OF SUCH
EXHIBIT.
NOTICE OF INTERNET AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy
Materials for the 2010 Annual General Meeting to be held on May 6,
2010.
The Proxy Statement and Annual Report are available
at
HTTP://WWW.PROXYVOTE.COM
- 43 -
You will need the Control Number included on your
proxy card. For the date, time, and location of the Annual General Meeting,
please refer to “Solicitation of Proxies.” For information on how to attend and
vote in person at the Annual General Meeting, an identification of the matters
to be voted upon at the Annual General Meeting and the Board’s recommendations
regarding those matters, please refer to “Solicitation of Proxies,” “Election of
Directors” and “Appointment of Independent Registered Accounting
Firm.”
HOUSEHOLDING OF ANNUAL MEETING
MATERIALS
The SEC has enacted a rule that allows multiple
investors residing at the same address the convenience of receiving a single
copy of annual reports, proxy statements, prospectuses and other disclosure
documents if they consent to do so. This is known as “Householding.” Please
note, if you do not respond, Householding will start 60 days after the mailing
of this notice. We will allow Householding only upon certain conditions. Some of
those conditions are:
- You agree to or do not object to the Householding of your
materials,
- You have the same last name and exact address as another investor(s).
If these conditions are met, and SEC regulations
allow, your household will receive a single copy of annual reports, proxy
statements, prospectuses and other disclosure documents.
You may revoke a prior Householding consent at any
time by contacting Broadridge, either by calling toll-free at (800) 542-1061, or
by writing to Broadridge, Householding Department, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood,
New York, 11717. We will remove you from the Householding program within 30 days
of receipt of your response, following which you will receive an individual copy
of our disclosure document.
|
By
order of the Board of Directors |
|
|
|
Gary C.
Wilkerson
|
|
Corporate
Secretary
|
- 44 -
|
MUELLER INDUSTRIES, INC. ATTN: GARY WILKERSON 8285 TOURNAMENT
DRIVE-STE. 150 MEMPHIS, TN 38125 |
VOTE BY
INTERNET - www.proxyvote.com |
Use the Internet to
transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of
information up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off
date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web
site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an
electronic voting instruction form. |
|
Electronic
Delivery of Future PROXY MATERIALS |
If you would like
to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials,
you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and
annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for
electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using
the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or
access proxy materials electronically in future years. |
|
VOTE BY PHONE -
1-800-690-6903 |
Use any touch-tone
telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern
Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card
in hand when you call and then follow the instructions. |
|
VOTE BY MAIL
|
Mark, sign and date
your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have
provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way,
Edgewood, NY 11717. |
TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK
AS FOLLOWS: |
|
|
KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS |
|
DETACH AND RETURN THIS
PORTION ONLY |
THIS PROXY
CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND
DATED.
|
|
|
|
For
All |
Withhold All |
For
All Except |
|
To withhold authority to vote for
any individual nominee(s), mark “For All Except” and write the number(s)
of the nominee(s) on the line below. |
|
|
|
The Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR the
following:
|
|
|
o |
o |
o |
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Election of
Directors Nominees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
01 |
Alexander P.
Federbush |
02 |
Paul J.
Flaherty |
03 |
Gennaro J.
Fulvio |
04 |
Gary S.
Gladstein |
05 |
Scott J.
Goldman |
06 |
Terry Hermanson |
07 |
Harvey L. Karp |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Board
of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following proposal(s): |
|
For |
Against |
Abstain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. |
Approve the appointment of Ernst &
Young LLP as independent auditors of the Company.
|
|
o |
o |
o |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE: Such other business as may properly come before
the meeting or any adjournment thereof. THIS PROXY, WHEN PROPERLY
EXECUTED, WILL BE VOTED IN THE MANNER DIRECTED HEREIN BY THE SIGNED
STOCKHOLDER. IF NO DIRECTION IS GIVEN, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED "FOR" ALL
NOMINEES LISTED AND "FOR" PROPOSAL 2. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign exactly as
your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor,
administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint
owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a
corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership
name, by authorized officer. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] |
Date |
|
|
Signature (Joint Owners) |
Date |
|
Important Notice Regarding the
Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting: The Annual Report, Notice & Proxy Statement is/are available at
www.proxyvote.com. |
|
|
MUELLER INDUSTRIES,
INC.
PROXY FOR ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS - MAY
6, 2010
This Proxy is Solicited on Behalf of the Board of
Directors.
The undersigned hereby appoints Gary C.
Wilkerson and Kent A. McKee, and each of them, Proxies, with full power of
substitution in each, to represent and to vote, as designated, all shares of
Common Stock of Mueller Industries, Inc. that the undersigned is entitled to
vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 6, 2010, and at all
adjournments thereof, upon and in respect of the matters set forth on the
reverse side hereof, and in their discretion, upon any other matter that may
properly come before said meeting.
PLEASE MARK, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THIS PROXY CARD PROMPTLY USING THE
ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.
Continued and to be signed on reverse
side