energizer_10q.htm
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13
OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For Quarter Ended March 31,
2010
Commission File No.
001-15401
ENERGIZER HOLDINGS,
INC. |
|
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter) |
|
|
|
MISSOURI |
|
43-1863181 |
(State of
Incorporation) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification
No.) |
|
533 MARYVILLE UNIVERSITY DRIVE, ST.
LOUIS MISSOURI 63141 |
|
(Address of principal executive
offices) (Zip Code) |
|
(314) 985-2000 |
|
(Registrant’s telephone number,
including area code) |
Indicate by check
mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months, and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90
days.
YES: þ NO: o
Indicate by check
mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted
and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter)
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit and post such files).
YES: þ NO: o
Indicate by check
mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
“large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company”
in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer þ |
Accelerated filer o |
Non-accelerated filer o |
Smaller reporting |
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller
reporting |
company o |
|
|
company) |
|
Indicate by check
mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
YES: o NO: þ
Indicate the number
of shares of Energizer Holdings, Inc. common stock, $.01 par value, outstanding
as of the close of business on April 23, 2010: 70,036,447
1
INDEX
|
|
|
Page |
PART I — FINANCIAL
INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
Item 1. Financial
Statements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited Consolidated Statement of
Earnings and Comprehensive Income Condensed for the |
|
|
|
Three and Six Months Ended
March 31, 2010 and 2009 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited Consolidated Balance
Sheets Condensed as of March 31, 2010 and September 30, 2009 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited Consolidated Statements
of Cash Flows Condensed for the Six Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 and 2009 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes to Unaudited Condensed
Financial Statements |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Items 2 and 3. Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of |
|
|
|
Operations and Quantitative and
Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
Item 4. Controls and
Procedures |
28 |
|
|
|
|
PART II — OTHER
INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
Item 1. Legal
Proceedings |
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of
Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
28 |
|
|
|
|
Item 6. Exhibits |
28 |
|
|
|
SIGNATURE |
29 |
|
|
|
|
EXHIBIT INDEX |
30 |
2
PART I - FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial
Statements
ENERGIZER HOLDINGS,
INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS AND
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Condensed)
(Dollars in millions, except per share
data - Unaudited)
|
|
Quarter Ended March
31, |
|
Six Months Ended March
31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Net sales |
|
$ |
935.1 |
|
|
$ |
880.4 |
|
|
$ |
2,111.8 |
|
|
$ |
1,922.9 |
|
Cost of products sold |
|
|
487.9 |
|
|
|
466.8 |
|
|
|
1,104.4 |
|
|
|
995.8 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
447.2 |
|
|
|
413.6 |
|
|
|
1,007.4 |
|
|
|
927.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
expense |
|
|
187.8 |
|
|
|
158.0 |
|
|
|
371.8 |
|
|
|
332.0 |
|
Advertising and promotion expense |
|
|
76.8 |
|
|
|
79.7 |
|
|
|
165.5 |
|
|
|
176.8 |
|
Research and development
expense |
|
|
23.5 |
|
|
|
21.5 |
|
|
|
44.9 |
|
|
|
41.4 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
32.3 |
|
|
|
35.7 |
|
|
|
64.3 |
|
|
|
74.7 |
|
Other financing items,
net |
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
34.1 |
|
|
|
26.6 |
|
Earnings before income taxes |
|
|
128.3 |
|
|
|
113.0 |
|
|
|
326.8 |
|
|
|
275.6 |
|
Income tax provision |
|
|
39.8 |
|
|
|
36.0 |
|
|
|
112.6 |
|
|
|
87.6 |
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
88.5 |
|
|
$ |
77.0 |
|
|
$ |
214.2 |
|
|
$ |
188.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
1.27 |
|
|
$ |
1.32 |
|
|
$ |
3.07 |
|
|
$ |
3.22 |
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
1.25 |
|
|
$ |
1.30 |
|
|
$ |
3.04 |
|
|
$ |
3.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of
Comprehensive Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
88.5 |
|
|
$ |
77.0 |
|
|
$ |
214.2 |
|
|
$ |
188.0 |
|
Other comprehensive income, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation
adjustments |
|
|
(36.2 |
) |
|
|
(45.6 |
) |
|
|
(71.2 |
) |
|
|
(80.2 |
) |
Pension/Postretirement
activity, net of tax of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$0.2 and $(0.1) for the quarter and six |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
months ended March 31, 2010, respectively and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$(0.5) and $0.8 for the quarter and six months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ended March 31, 2009 respectively |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
Deferred (loss)/gain on
hedging activity, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of $(1.1) and $3.6 for the quarter and six |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
months ended March 31, 2010, respectively |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and $7.7 and $7.3 for the quarter and six |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
months ended March 31, 2009, respectively |
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
|
12.3 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
$ |
51.6 |
|
|
$ |
44.4 |
|
|
$ |
150.5 |
|
|
$ |
125.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements
3
ENERGIZER HOLDINGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE
SHEETS
(Condensed)
(Dollars in millions -
Unaudited)
|
|
March 31, |
|
September 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash
equivalents |
|
$ |
396.2 |
|
|
$ |
359.3 |
|
Trade receivables, less
allowance for doubtful |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
accounts of $12.8 and $11.3, respectively |
|
|
773.6 |
|
|
|
810.0 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
637.6 |
|
|
|
667.3 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
273.6 |
|
|
|
289.2 |
|
Total current assets |
|
|
2,081.0 |
|
|
|
2,125.8 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
838.7 |
|
|
|
863.4 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
1,314.9 |
|
|
|
1,326.2 |
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
1,779.4 |
|
|
|
1,788.6 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
38.2 |
|
|
|
45.0 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
6,052.2 |
|
|
$ |
6,149.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders'
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current maturities of
long-term debt |
|
$ |
196.0 |
|
|
$ |
101.0 |
|
Notes payable |
|
|
27.5 |
|
|
|
169.1 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
217.5 |
|
|
|
231.6 |
|
Other current
liabilities |
|
|
554.9 |
|
|
|
657.8 |
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
995.9 |
|
|
|
1,159.5 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
2,190.5 |
|
|
|
2,288.5 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
939.4 |
|
|
|
938.7 |
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
4,125.8 |
|
|
|
4,386.7 |
|
Shareholders' equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
Additional paid in
capital |
|
|
1,554.3 |
|
|
|
1,555.3 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
2,171.9 |
|
|
|
1,963.2 |
|
Treasury stock |
|
|
(1,682.3 |
) |
|
|
(1,702.4 |
) |
Accumulated other
comprehensive loss |
|
|
(118.6 |
) |
|
|
(54.9 |
) |
Total shareholders' equity |
|
|
1,926.4 |
|
|
|
1,762.3 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
6,052.2 |
|
|
$ |
6,149.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements
4
ENERGIZER HOLDINGS,
INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH
FLOWS
(Condensed)
(Dollars in millions - Unaudited)
|
|
Six Months Ended March
31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Cash flow from
operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
214.2 |
|
|
$ |
188.0 |
|
Non-cash items included in
income |
|
|
138.0 |
|
|
|
105.2 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
(4.3 |
) |
|
|
(33.9 |
) |
Operating cash flow before changes in working capital |
|
|
347.9 |
|
|
|
259.3 |
|
Changes in current assets and
liabilities used in operations |
|
|
(73.7 |
) |
|
|
(133.1 |
) |
Net cash from operations |
|
|
274.2 |
|
|
|
126.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow from investing
activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(48.5 |
) |
|
|
(75.7 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of
assets |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
(5.0 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
Net cash used by investing activities |
|
|
(53.1 |
) |
|
|
(75.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow from financing
activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash payments on debt with
original maturities greater than 90 days |
|
|
(3.0 |
) |
|
|
(3.0 |
) |
Net decrease in debt with
original maturities of 90 days or less |
|
|
(145.3 |
) |
|
|
(75.6 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of
common stock |
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
Excess tax benefits from
share-based payments |
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
Net cash used by financing activities |
|
|
(140.2 |
) |
|
|
(77.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on
cash |
|
|
(44.0 |
) |
|
|
(13.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and
cash equivalents |
|
|
36.9 |
|
|
|
(40.5 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
359.3 |
|
|
|
171.2 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of
period |
|
$ |
396.2 |
|
|
$ |
130.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements
5
ENERGIZER HOLDINGS,
INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
March 31, 2010
(Dollars in millions, except per share data –
Unaudited)
The accompanying
unaudited financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Article 10
of Regulation S-X and do not include all of the information and footnotes
required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial
statements. The year-end condensed balance sheet data were derived from audited
financial statements, but do not include all disclosures required by accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In the opinion of
management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation have
been included. The Company has evaluated subsequent events and has determined
that no disclosure is necessary. Operating results for any quarter are not
necessarily indicative of the results for any other quarter or for the full
year. These statements should be read in conjunction with the financial
statements and notes thereto for Energizer Holdings, Inc. (the Company) for the
year ended September 30, 2009.
Note 1 – Segment
note
Operations
for the Company are managed via two segments - Household Products (Battery and
Lighting Products) and Personal Care (Wet Shave, Skin Care, Feminine Care and
Infant Care). Segment performance is evaluated based on segment operating
profit, exclusive of general corporate expenses, share-based compensation costs,
costs associated with most restructuring, integration or business realignment
activities and amortization of intangible assets. Financial items, such as
interest income and expense, are managed on a global basis at the corporate
level.
For the quarter and
six months ended March 31, 2010, the Company recorded a gain of $1.3 and a
charge of $24.2, respectively, related to the devaluation of our Venezuela
affiliate's U.S. dollar intercompany payable from the official rate to the
parallel rate and the negative impact of highly inflationary accounting. This
negative impact, which is included in Other financing items on the Consolidated
Statement of Earnings, is shown as a separate line item on the table below and
is not considered in evaluating segment performance.
For the prior
quarter and six months ended March 31, 2009, cost of products sold and selling,
general and administrative expense (SG&A) reflected favorable adjustments of
$11.1 and $11.9, respectively, related to the change in policy under which
Energizer colleagues earn and vest in the Company's paid time off (PTO). These
favorable adjustments were not reflected in the Household Products or Personal
Care segments, but rather presented on a separate line below segment profit as
it was not operational in nature. Such presentation reflects management's view
on how it evaluates segment performance.
The Company’s
operating model includes a combination of stand-alone and combined business
functions between the Household Products and Personal Care businesses, varying
by country and region of the world. Shared functions include product warehousing
and distribution, various transaction processing functions, and in some
countries, combined sales forces and management. The Company applies a fully
allocated cost basis, in which shared business functions are allocated between
the businesses. Such allocations do not represent the costs of such services if
performed on a stand-alone basis.
Segment sales and
profitability for the quarter and six months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively, are presented below.
6
|
For the quarter ended
March 31, |
|
For the six months ended
March 31, |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Net
Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Household Products |
$ |
441.8 |
|
$ |
417.1 |
|
$ |
1,145.8 |
|
$ |
1,065.1 |
Personal Care |
|
493.3 |
|
|
463.3 |
|
|
966.0 |
|
|
857.8 |
Total net sales |
$ |
935.1 |
|
$ |
880.4 |
|
$ |
2,111.8 |
|
$ |
1,922.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For
the quarter ended March 31, |
|
For
the six months ended March 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Profitability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Household Products |
|
$ |
71.9 |
|
|
$ |
54.9 |
|
|
$ |
250.7 |
|
|
$ |
210.1 |
|
Personal Care |
|
|
115.5 |
|
|
|
100.9 |
|
|
|
235.7 |
|
|
|
192.3 |
|
Total
segment profitability |
|
$ |
187.4 |
|
|
$ |
155.8 |
|
|
$ |
486.4 |
|
|
$ |
402.4 |
|
General corporate and other
expenses |
|
|
(24.9 |
) |
|
|
(21.0 |
) |
|
|
(54.4 |
) |
|
|
(41.7 |
) |
Venezuela devaluation/hyper
inflation |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(24.2 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
PTO Policy Change |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
23.0 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
23.0 |
|
Amortization |
|
|
(3.4 |
) |
|
|
(3.4 |
) |
|
|
(6.8 |
) |
|
|
(6.8 |
) |
Interest and other financing
items |
|
|
(32.1 |
) |
|
|
(41.4 |
) |
|
|
(74.2 |
) |
|
|
(101.3 |
) |
Earnings
before income taxes |
|
$ |
128.3 |
|
|
$ |
113.0 |
|
|
$ |
326.8 |
|
|
$ |
275.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
product information is presented below for revenues from external
customers:
|
For the quarter ended
March 31, |
|
For the six months
ended March 31, |
Net
Sales |
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Alkaline batteries |
$ |
244.6 |
|
$ |
236.4 |
|
$ |
690.3 |
|
$ |
636.7 |
Carbon zinc
batteries |
|
44.6 |
|
|
42.5 |
|
|
102.7 |
|
|
98.4 |
Other batteries and lighting
products |
|
152.6 |
|
|
138.2 |
|
|
352.8 |
|
|
330.0 |
Wet Shave |
|
271.8 |
|
|
252.5 |
|
|
588.6 |
|
|
498.1 |
Skin Care |
|
117.3 |
|
|
111.8 |
|
|
177.1 |
|
|
162.4 |
Feminine Care |
|
52.2 |
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
98.4 |
|
|
101.6 |
Infant Care |
|
52.0 |
|
|
49.0 |
|
|
101.9 |
|
|
95.7 |
Total
net sales |
$ |
935.1 |
|
$ |
880.4 |
|
$ |
2,111.8 |
|
$ |
1,922.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets by
segment are presented below:
|
March
31, |
|
September
30, |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Household
Products |
$ |
1,175.5 |
|
$ |
1,370.6 |
Personal Care |
|
1,213.0 |
|
|
1,125.7 |
Total segment assets |
|
2,388.5 |
|
|
2,496.3 |
Corporate |
|
569.4 |
|
|
537.9 |
Goodwill and other
intangible assets, net |
|
3,094.3 |
|
|
3,114.8 |
Total
assets |
$ |
6,052.2 |
|
$ |
6,149.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 2 – Venezuela
At December 31, 2009, the Company
determined that the parallel rate was the appropriate rate to use for the
translation of our Venezuela affiliate’s financial statements for the purposes
of consolidation based on the facts and circumstances of our business, including
the fact that the parallel rate is the current method used to settle U.S. dollar
invoices for newly imported product and the Company has not remitted dividends
to the U.S. for an extended time period. While we continue to pursue the payment
of the affiliate’s legacy $31 outstanding U.S. dollar intercompany payable via
approvals to convert local currency to U.S. dollars at the recently devalued
official rate, we devalued this payable to the parallel rate at December 31,
2009, which was 6.00, given the aging of the payable. In the second quarter,
approximately $9 of this legacy intercompany payable was settled via approvals
from local authorities to convert local currency to U.S. dollars at rates
ranging between 2.60 and 4.30. Since these approvals were at a lower rate than
6.00, the Company recorded a $2.8 foreign exchange gain in the second quarter,
which partially offset the devaluation loss recorded in the first quarter. For
the six months ended March 31, 2010, we recorded a net after-tax charge of
$21.4, or $0.30 per diluted share due primarily to the devaluation of the legacy
U.S. dollar intercompany payable to the parallel rate, partially offset by the
settlement gains noted above. The impact reflects the potentially higher local
currency cost, which may be required to settle the U.S. dollar denominated
intercompany invoices if our efforts to procure approvals under the official
rate remain unsuccessful.
7
Effective January
1, 2010, the financial statements for our Venezuela subsidiary are consolidated
under the rules governing the translation of financial information in a highly
inflationary economy based on the use of the blended National Consumer Price
Index in Venezuela. Under U.S. GAAP, an economy is considered highly
inflationary if the cumulative inflation rate for a three year period meets or
exceeds 100 percent. If a subsidiary is considered to be in a highly
inflationary economy, the financial statements of the subsidiary must be
re-measured into the company’s reporting currency (U.S. dollar) and future
exchange gains and losses from the re-measurement of monetary assets and
liabilities are reflected in current earnings, rather than exclusively in the
equity section of the balance sheet, until such time as the economy is no longer
considered highly inflationary. For the second quarter, the devaluation of the
net monetary assets was $1.3. It is difficult to determine what, if any, impact
the use of highly inflationary accounting for Venezuela may have on our
consolidated financial statements in subsequent quarters as the impact is
dependent upon movements in the applicable exchange rates between the local
currency and the U.S. dollar and the amount of monetary assets and liabilities
included in our affiliate’s balance sheet. At March 31, 2010, the U.S. dollar
value of monetary assets, net of monetary liabilities, which would be subject to
an earnings impact from translation rate movements for our Venezuela affiliate
was approximately $12.
Note 3 – Restructuring and Related
Charges
The
Company continually reviews its Household Products and Personal Care business
models to identify potential improvements and cost savings. In July 2009, the
Board of Directors approved a restructuring plan designed primarily to
re-organize and reduce headcount in the Household Products business. The
approved plan provided for an offer of a voluntary enhanced retirement option
(VERO) to certain eligible hourly and salaried U.S. employees, and the
elimination of additional positions as part of a limited involuntary reduction
in force (RIF).
In fiscal 2009,
total pre-tax charges related to the VERO and RIF were $38.6, which represented
employee separation and related costs. Virtually all of these costs in 2009 were
recorded in SG&A expense. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009 and six
months ended March 31, 2010, payments of $5.8 and $30.2, respectively, were made
related to the VERO and RIF. We expect that the majority of the remaining
payments of $2.6 will be made by the end of the third quarter of fiscal
2010.
The Company
believes this restructuring plan was advisable to reduce the Company’s overhead
cost structure for its Household Products business. The VERO resulted in the
voluntary separation of 289 hourly and 101 salaried U.S. colleagues and the RIF
resulted in the termination of 46 colleagues in the U.S. and certain foreign
affiliates.
Note 4 – Share-based
payments
Total
compensation cost charged against income for the Company’s share-based
compensation arrangements was $6.8 and $15.0 for the current quarter and six
months, respectively, and $5.8 and $8.4 for the same quarter and six months last
year, respectively, and was recorded in SG&A expense. The total income tax
benefit recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings for share-based
compensation arrangements was $2.5 and $5.5 for the current quarter and six
months, respectively, and $2.2 and $3.1 for the same quarter and six months last
year, respectively.
8
Restricted Stock Equivalents
(RSE)
In October 2009, the Company granted RSE awards to key employees
which included approximately 266,300 shares that vest ratably over four years.
At the same time, the Company granted two RSE awards to key senior executives.
One grant includes approximately 145,900 shares and vests on the third
anniversary of the date of grant. The second grant includes approximately
339,700 shares which vests on the date that the Company publicly releases its
earnings for its 2012 fiscal year contingent upon the Company’s earnings per
share compound annual growth rate (EPS CAGR) for the three year period ending on
September 30, 2012. Under the terms of the award, 100% of the grant vests if a
three year EPS CAGR of at least 12% is achieved, with smaller percentages
vesting if the Company achieves a three year EPS CAGR between 5% and 12%. The
total award expected to vest is amortized over the vesting period.
Options
In October 2009, the Company granted
non-qualified stock options to purchase 266,750 shares of ENR stock to certain
executives and key employees of the Company. The options vest on the third
anniversary of the date of the grant, but may accelerate and become exercisable
before that date upon the recipient’s death or disability or upon a change in
control. The options remain exercisable for 10 years from the date of grant.
However, this term may be reduced under certain circumstances including the
recipient’s termination of employment.
Note 5 – Earnings per
share
Basic
earnings per share is based on the average number of common shares outstanding
during the period. Diluted earnings per share is based on the average number of
shares used for the basic earnings per share calculation, adjusted for the
dilutive effect of stock options and restricted stock equivalents.
The following table
sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the
quarters and six months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively.
(in millions, except per share data) |
|
Quarter Ended |
|
Six Months
Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
March 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings for basic and
dilutive earnings per share |
|
$ |
88.5 |
|
$ |
77.0 |
|
$ |
214.2 |
|
$ |
188.0 |
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares for
basic earnings per share |
|
|
69.9 |
|
|
58.3 |
|
|
69.8 |
|
|
58.3 |
Effect of dilutive
securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
0.5 |
Restricted stock equivalents |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
0.3 |
Total dilutive securities |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
0.8 |
Weighted-average shares for
diluted earnings per share |
|
|
70.5 |
|
|
59.1 |
|
|
70.4 |
|
|
59.1 |
Basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
1.27 |
|
$ |
1.32 |
|
$ |
3.07 |
|
$ |
3.22 |
Diluted earnings per
share |
|
$ |
1.25 |
|
$ |
1.30 |
|
$ |
3.04 |
|
$ |
3.18 |
At March 31, 2010
and 2009, approximately 1.3 and 1.4 million, respectively, of the Company’s
outstanding RSEs and stock options were not included in the diluted net earnings
per share calculation because to do so would have been anti-dilutive. In the
event the potentially dilutive securities are anti-dilutive on net earnings per
share (i.e., have the effect of increasing EPS because the exercise price is
higher than the current share price), the impact of the potentially dilutive
securities is not included in the computation.
Note 6 – Goodwill and intangibles,
net
The following
table sets forth goodwill by segment as of October 1, 2009 and March 31,
2010.
9
|
|
Household |
|
Personal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products |
|
Care |
|
Total |
Balance at October 1,
2009 |
|
$ |
37.1 |
|
|
$ |
1,289.1 |
|
|
$ |
1,326.2 |
|
Cumulative translation adjustment |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(10.9 |
) |
|
|
(11.3 |
) |
Balance at March 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
36.7 |
|
|
$ |
1,278.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,314.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total amortizable
intangible assets other than goodwill at March 31, 2010 are as
follows:
|
|
Gross |
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying
Amount |
|
Amortization |
|
Net |
To be amortized: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tradenames/Brands |
|
$ |
11.4 |
|
$ |
(8.2 |
) |
|
$ |
3.2 |
Technology and patents |
|
|
52.7 |
|
|
(27.1 |
) |
|
|
25.6 |
Customer-related/Other |
|
|
68.9 |
|
|
(20.8 |
) |
|
|
48.1 |
Total amortizable intangible assets |
|
$ |
133.0 |
|
$ |
(56.1 |
) |
|
$ |
76.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The carrying amount
of indefinite-lived trademarks and tradenames was $1,702.5 at March 31, 2010, a
decrease of $6.7 from September 30, 2009. Changes in indefinite-lived trademarks
and tradenames are due primarily to changes in foreign currency exchange rates.
Estimated amortization expense for amortizable intangible assets is $14.6,
$14.2, $14.2, $11.9 and $8.9 for the years ending September 30, 2010 through
2014, respectively.
Note 7 – Pension plans and other
postretirement benefits
The Company has several defined benefit pension plans covering
substantially all of its employees in the United States (U.S.) and certain
employees in other countries. The plans provide retirement benefits based on
years of service and earnings. The Company also sponsors or participates in a
number of other non-U.S. pension arrangements, including various retirement and
termination benefit plans, some of which are required by local law or
coordinated with government-sponsored plans, which are not significant in the
aggregate and, therefore, are not included in the information presented below.
Health care and life insurance postretirement benefits are also currently
provided by the Company for certain groups of retired employees.
The Company’s net
periodic benefit cost for these plans is as follows:
|
Pension |
|
Quarter ended March
31, |
|
Six months ended March
31, |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Service cost |
$ |
8.2 |
|
|
$ |
7.5 |
|
|
$ |
16.4 |
|
|
$ |
15.5 |
|
Interest cost |
|
12.7 |
|
|
|
13.2 |
|
|
|
25.3 |
|
|
|
26.4 |
|
Expected return on plan
assets |
|
(15.3 |
) |
|
|
(15.3 |
) |
|
|
(30.9 |
) |
|
|
(30.6 |
) |
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
(3.0 |
) |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
Amortization of unrecognized net
loss |
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
Amortization of transition obligation |
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
Settlement loss
recognized |
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
Net periodic benefit
cost |
$ |
6.3 |
|
|
$ |
5.6 |
|
|
$ |
11.9 |
|
|
$ |
15.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Postretirement |
|
|
Quarter ended March
31, |
|
Six months ended March
31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Service cost |
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
Amortization of prior service
cost |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
Amortization of unrecognized net loss |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
Net periodic benefit
income |
|
$ |
(0.4 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.4 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.7 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On December 31,
2008, the FASB issued an accounting standard that will require additional
disclosures about the major categories of plan assets and concentrations of risk
for an employer’s plan assets of a defined benefit pension or other
postretirement plan, as well as disclosure of fair value levels, similar to the
disclosure requirements of the fair value measurements accounting standard.
These enhanced disclosures about plan assets will be provided in the Company’s
2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Note 8 – Debt
Notes payable at March 31, 2010 and
September 30, 2009 consisted of notes payable to financial institutions with
original maturities of less than one year of $27.5 and $169.1, respectively, and
had a weighted-average interest rate of 5.5% and 3.5%,
respectively.
The detail of
long-term debt at March 31, 2010 and September 30, 2009 is as
follows:
|
March 31, |
|
September
30, |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Private
Placement, fixed interest rates ranging from 3.6% to |
$ |
1,930.0 |
|
$ |
1,930.0 |
6.6%, due
2010 to 2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
Term Loan,
variable interest at LIBOR + 75 basis points, or |
|
456.5 |
|
|
459.5 |
1.00%, due 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total
long-term debt, including current maturities |
|
2,386.5 |
|
|
2,389.5 |
Less current portion |
|
196.0 |
|
|
101.0 |
Total long-term debt |
$ |
2,190.5 |
|
$ |
2,288.5 |
The Company’s total
borrowings were $2,414.0 at March 31, 2010, including $484.0 tied to variable
interest rates of which $300 is hedged via the interest rate swap noted below.
The Company maintains total debt facilities of $2,904.0, of which $477.4
remained available as of March 31, 2010.
During the second
quarter of fiscal 2009, the Company entered into interest rate swap agreements
with two major financial institutions that fixed the variable benchmark
component (LIBOR) of the Company’s interest rate on $300 of the Company’s
variable rate debt through December 2012 at an interest rate of
1.9%.
Under the terms of
the Company’s credit agreements, the ratio of the Company’s indebtedness to its
EBITDA, as defined in the agreements, cannot be greater than 4.00 to 1, and may
not remain above 3.50 to 1 for more than four consecutive quarters. If and so
long as the ratio is above 3.50 to 1 for any period, the Company is required to
pay additional interest expense for the period in which the ratio exceeds 3.50
to 1. The interest rate margin and certain fees vary depending on the
indebtedness to EBITDA ratio. Under the Company’s private placement note
agreements, the ratio of indebtedness to EBITDA may not exceed 4.0 to 1.
However, if the ratio is above 3.50 to 1, the Company is required to pay an
additional 75 basis points in interest for the period in which the ratio exceeds
3.50 to 1. In addition, under the credit agreements, the ratio of its current
year EBIT, as defined in the agreements, to total interest expense must exceed
3.00 to 1. The Company’s ratio of indebtedness to its EBITDA was 2.99 to 1, and
the ratio of its EBIT to total interest expense was 5.01 to 1, as of March 31,
2010. Each of the calculations at March 31, 2010 was pro forma for the
Edge/Skintimate shave preparation acquisition.
11
The Company
anticipates that it will remain in compliance with its debt covenants for the
foreseeable future. The negative impact on EBITDA resulting from the voluntary
retirement (VERO) and reduction in force (RIF) charges in the fourth quarter of
2009 had a negative impact on the ratio of indebtedness to EBITDA as such
charges are not excluded from the calculation of trailing twelve month EBITDA
under the terms of the agreements. The VERO and RIF charges will negatively
impact trailing twelve month EBITDA, which is used in the ratio, through the
third quarter of fiscal 2010, after which it will roll out of the calculation.
Savings from the VERO and RIF programs will somewhat mitigate the negative
EBITDA impact of the restructuring charges as they are realized during this time
frame, and will remain a positive impact on the ratio going forward. In
addition, the Venezuela devaluation charge of $22.7 is also included in the
trailing twelve month EBITDA calculation at March 31, 2010, and will negatively
impact the ratio of indebtedness to EBITDA for all of fiscal 2010. If the
Company fails to comply with the financial covenants referred to above or with
other requirements of the credit agreements or private placement note
agreements, the lenders would have the right to accelerate the maturity of the
debt. Acceleration under one of these facilities would trigger cross defaults on
other borrowings.
The Company
routinely sells a pool of U.S. accounts receivable through a financing
arrangement between Energizer Receivables Funding Corporation, which is a
bankruptcy-remote special purpose entity subsidiary of the Company, and outside
parties (the Conduits). Under the current structure, funds received from the
Conduit are treated as borrowings rather than proceeds of accounts receivables
sold for accounting purposes. Borrowings under this program, which may not
exceed $200, receive favorable treatment in the Company’s debt compliance
covenants. The program renews annually in May. We can provide no assurance that
the facility will be renewable on an annual basis, or if renewed, it may be done
so on less favorable terms. At March 31, 2010, the Company had no borrowings
outstanding under this facility.
The counterparties
to long-term committed borrowings consist of a number of major financial
institutions. The Company continually monitors positions with, and credit
ratings of, counterparties both internally and by using outside ratings
agencies. The Company has staggered long-term borrowing maturities through 2017
to reduce refinancing risk in any single year and to optimize the use of cash
flow for repayment.
Aggregate
maturities of long-term debt, including current maturities, at March 31, 2010
are as follows: $196.0 in one year, $221.0 in two years, $754.5 in three years,
$175.0 in four years, $220.0 in five years and $820.0 thereafter.
Note 9 – Treasury
stock
The Company
did not purchase any shares of its common stock during the quarter ended March
31, 2010 under its July 2006 authorization from the Board of Directors. This
authorization granted approval for the Company to acquire up to 10 million
shares of its common stock, of which 2.0 million have been repurchased to date.
Future purchases may be made from time to time on the open market or through
privately negotiated transactions, subject to corporate objectives and the
discretion of management.
Note 10 – Financial Instruments Measured
At Fair Value
Accounting guidance on fair value measurements for certain financial
assets and liabilities requires that assets and liabilities carried at fair
value be classified in one of the following three categories:
Level 1: Quoted
market prices in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities.
Level 2:
Observable market based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by
market data.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs reflecting the reporting entity’s
own assumptions or external inputs from inactive markets.
12
Under the fair
value accounting guidance hierarchy, an entity is required to maximize the use
of quoted market prices and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The
following table sets forth the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, which
are carried at fair value, as of March 31, 2010 and September 30, 2009 that are
measured on a recurring basis during the period, segregated by level within the
fair value hierarchy:
|
Level
1 |
|
Level
2 |
|
Level
3 |
|
Total |
|
March 31, |
|
September 30, |
|
March 31, |
|
September 30, |
|
March 31, |
|
September 30, |
|
March 31, |
|
September 30, |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Assets at fair value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share Option |
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
2.0 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
2.0 |
Derivatives - Interest Rate
Swap |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
3.4 |
Derivatives - Commodity |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
6.1 |
Total Assets at fair
value |
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
5.5 |
|
$ |
11.5 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
5.5 |
|
$ |
11.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities at fair
value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share Option |
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
0.6 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
0.6 |
|
$ |
- |
Derivatives - Foreign
Exchange |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
16.3 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
16.3 |
Derivatives - Interest Rate Swap |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
- |
Deferred Compensation |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
122.4 |
|
|
124.3 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
122.4 |
|
|
124.3 |
Total Liabilities at fair
value |
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
126.4 |
|
$ |
140.6 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
126.4 |
|
$ |
140.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2010,
the fair value of foreign currency, interest rate swap and commodity contracts
is the amount that the Company would receive or pay to terminate the contracts,
considering first, quoted market prices of comparable agreements, or in the
absence of quoted market prices, such factors as interest rates, currency
exchange rates and remaining maturities. See the table above for further
information on the fair value of these contracts.
Due to the nature
of cash and cash equivalents and short-term borrowings, including notes payable,
carrying amounts on the balance sheet approximate fair value.
At March 31, 2010,
the fair market value of fixed rate long-term debt was $2,062.0 compared to its
carrying value of $1,930.0. The book value of the Company’s variable rate debt
approximates fair value. The fair value of the long-term debt is estimated using
yields obtained from independent pricing sources for similar types of borrowing
arrangements.
Effective October
1, 2009, the Company adopted new fair value guidance for nonfinancial assets and
liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the
financial statements on a recurring basis. Assets and liabilities subject to
this guidance primarily include goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets
measured at fair value for impairment assessments, long-lived assets measured at
fair value for impairment assessments, and non-financial assets and liabilities
measured at fair value in business combinations. The adoption of this new
guidance did not affect our financial position, results of operations or cash
flows for the periods presented.
Note 11 – Derivatives and Other Hedging
Instruments
In the
ordinary course of business, the Company enters into contractual arrangements
(derivatives) to reduce its exposure to foreign currency, interest rate and
commodity price risks. The section below outlines the types of derivatives that
existed at March 31, 2010 and 2009 as well as the Company’s objectives and
strategies for holding these derivative instruments.
Commodity Price Risk -
The Company uses raw
materials that are subject to price volatility. At times, hedging instruments
are used by the Company to reduce exposure to variability in cash flows
associated with future purchases of zinc or other commodities. The fair market
value of the Company's outstanding hedging instruments included in Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Loss was an unrealized pre-tax gain of $5.5 and $6.1 at
March 31, 2010 and September 30, 2009, respectively. Over the next twelve
months, approximately $5.2 of the gain recognized in Accumulated Other
Comprehensive Loss will be included in earnings. Contract maturities for these
hedges extend into fiscal year 2011. There were 15 open contracts at March 31,
2010.
13
Foreign Currency Risk — A significant portion of Energizer’s
product cost is more closely tied to the U.S. dollar than to the local
currencies in which the product is sold. As such, a weakening of currencies
relative to the U.S. dollar results in margin declines unless mitigated through
pricing actions, which are not always available due to the competitive
environment. Conversely, a strengthening in currencies relative to the U.S.
dollar can improve margins. As a result, the Company has entered into a series
of forward currency contracts to hedge the cash flow uncertainty of forecasted
inventory purchases due to short term currency fluctuations. The Company’s
primary foreign affiliates, which are exposed to U.S. dollar purchases, have the
euro, the yen, the British pound, the Canadian dollar and the Australian dollar
as their local currencies. At March 31, 2010 and September 30, 2009,
respectively, the Company had an unrealized gain on these forward currency
contracts accounted for as cash flow hedges of $0.8 and an unrecognized loss of
$15.3 included in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss. Assuming foreign
exchange rates versus the U.S. dollar remain at March 31, 2010 levels, over the
next twelve months, approximately $0.4 of the gain recognized in Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Loss will be included in earnings. Contract maturities for
these hedges extend into fiscal year 2012. There were 45 open contracts at March
31, 2010.
Interest Rate Risk — The Company has interest rate risk
with respect to interest expense on variable rate debt. At March 31, 2010, the
Company had $484.0 variable rate debt outstanding. During fiscal 2009, the
Company entered into interest rate swap agreements with two major financial
institutions that fixed the variable benchmark component (LIBOR) of the
Company’s interest rate on $300 of the Company’s variable rate debt for the next
three years. At March 31, 2010 and September 30, 2009, respectively, the Company
had an unrecognized pre-tax loss on these interest rate swap agreements of $1.8
and an unrealized gain of $3.4 included in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss.
Cash Flow
Hedges
The
Company maintains a number of cash flow hedging programs, as discussed above, to
reduce risks related to commodity, foreign currency and interest rate risk. Each
of these derivative instruments have a high correlation to the underlying
exposure being hedged and have been deemed highly effective in offsetting the
associated risk.
Derivatives not Designated in Hedging
Relationships
The Company holds a share option with a major financial institution to
mitigate the impact of changes in certain of the Company’s deferred compensation
liabilities, which are tied to the Company’s common stock price. Period activity
related to the share option is classified in the same category in the cash flow
statement as the period activity associated with the Company’s deferred
compensation liability, which was cash flow from operations.
In addition, the
Company enters into foreign currency derivative contracts which are not
designated as cash flow hedges for accounting purposes to hedge existing balance
sheet exposures. Any losses on these contracts would be offset by exchange gains
on the underlying exposures, thus they are not subject to significant market
risk.
14
The following table
provides fair values, and amounts of gains and losses on derivative instruments
classified as cash flow hedges for the quarter and
six months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
For Quarter Ended |
|
For Six Months
Ended |
|
|
At March 31, 2010 |
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain/(Loss) |
|
|
|
Gain/(Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain/(Loss) |
|
Reclassified From |
|
Gain/(Loss) |
|
Reclassified
From |
Derivatives designated
as |
|
Fair Value |
|
Recognized |
|
OCI into Income |
|
Recognized |
|
OCI into Income |
Cash Flow Hedging
Relationships |
|
Asset (Liability) (1)
(2) |
|
in OCI (3) |
|
(Effective Portion) (4)
(5) |
|
in OCI (3) |
|
(Effective Portion) (4)
(5) |
Foreign currency
contracts |
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
|
$ |
2.9 |
|
|
$ |
(2.6 |
) |
|
$ |
5.3 |
|
|
$ |
(10.8 |
) |
Commodity contracts (6) |
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
Interest rate contracts |
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
|
(3.3 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(5.2 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Total |
|
$ |
4.5 |
|
|
$ |
(2.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.1 |
) |
|
$ |
4.7 |
|
|
$ |
(8.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
For Quarter Ended |
|
For Six Months
Ended |
|
|
At March 31, 2009 |
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain/(Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
Gain/(Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain/(Loss) |
|
Reclassified From |
|
Gain/(Loss) |
|
Reclassified
From |
Derivatives designated
as |
|
Fair Value |
|
Recognized |
|
OCI into Income |
|
Recognized |
|
OCI into Income |
Cash Flow Hedging
Relationships |
|
Asset (Liability) (1)
(2) |
|
in OCI (3) |
|
(Effective Portion) (4)
(5) |
|
in OCI (3) |
|
(Effective Portion) (4)
(5) |
Foreign currency
contracts |
|
$ |
13.7 |
|
|
$ |
14.7 |
|
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
|
$ |
14.2 |
|
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
Commodity contracts (7) |
|
|
(4.2 |
) |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
(6.3 |
) |
|
|
(5.8 |
) |
|
|
(13.1 |
) |
Interest rate contracts |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Total |
|
$ |
8.9 |
|
|
$ |
14.6 |
|
|
$ |
(5.8 |
) |
|
$ |
7.3 |
|
|
$ |
(12.6 |
) |
(1) |
|
All derivative assets are presented in other current assets or
other assets. |
(2) |
|
All derivative liabilities are presented in other current
liabilities or other liabilities. |
(3) |
|
OCI is defined as other comprehensive income. |
(4) |
|
Gain/(Loss) reclassified to Income was recorded as follows: Foreign
currency contracts in other financing, net, commodity contracts in cost of
products sold. |
(5) |
|
Each of these derivative instruments has a high correlation to the
underlying exposure being hedged and has been deemed highly effective in
offsetting the associated risk. The ineffective portion recognized in
income was insignificant to the quarter and six months ended March 31,
2010 and 2009. |
(6) |
|
For the quarter and six months ended March 31, 2010, $2.8 and $5.2,
respectively, of gains associated with the Company's settled commodity
contracts were capitalized to inventory. The gain taken to cost of
products sold as a result of inventory being sold was $2.5 and $2.6 for
the quarter and six months ended March 31, 2010. |
(7) |
|
For the quarter and six months ended March 31, 2009, $5.5 and
$11.4, respectively, of losses associated with the Company's settled
commodity contracts were capitalized to inventory. The charge taken to
cost of products sold as a result of inventory being sold was $6.3 and
$13.1, respectively, for the quarter and six months ended March 31,
2009. |
The following table
provides fair values, and amounts of gains and losses on derivative instruments
not classified as cash flow hedges for the quarter and six months ended March
31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
For Quarter Ended |
|
For Six Months
Ended |
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2010 |
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
Derivatives not designated
as |
|
Fair Value |
|
Gain/(Loss) |
|
Gain/(Loss) |
|
Income
Statement |
Cash Flow Hedging
Relationships |
|
Asset (Liability) |
|
Recognized in
Income |
|
Recognized in
Income |
|
Classification |
Share option |
|
$ |
(0.6 |
) |
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
|
$ |
(2.6 |
) |
|
SG&A |
Foreign currency contracts |
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
(3.8 |
) |
|
|
(6.0 |
) |
Other financing items,
net |
Total |
|
$ |
(3.0 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(8.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
For Quarter Ended |
|
For Six Months
Ended |
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2009 |
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
Derivatives not designated
as |
|
Fair Value |
|
Gain/(Loss) |
|
Gain/(Loss) |
|
Income
Statement |
Cash Flow Hedging
Relationships |
|
Asset (Liability) |
|
Recognized in
Income |
|
Recognized in
Income |
|
Classification |
Share option |
|
$ |
7.4 |
|
|
$ |
(3.2 |
) |
|
$ |
(14.9 |
) |
|
SG&A |
Foreign currency contracts |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
Other financing items,
net |
Total |
|
$ |
6.9 |
|
|
$ |
1.3 |
|
|
$ |
(13.5 |
) |
|
|
15
Note 12 – Supplemental Financial
Statement Information
SUPPLEMENTAL BALANCE SHEET
INFORMATION: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
September 30, |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Inventories |
|
|
|
|
|
Raw materials and supplies |
$ |
75.8 |
|
$ |
79.2
|
Work in
process |
|
130.7 |
|
|
119.6
|
Finished
products |
|
431.1 |
|
|
468.5
|
Total inventories |
$ |
637.6 |
|
$ |
667.3
|
Other Current
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
Miscellaneous
receivables |
$ |
36.8 |
|
$ |
54.3
|
Deferred income
tax benefits |
|
129.7 |
|
|
133.0
|
Prepaid
expenses |
|
87.8 |
|
|
80.9
|
Other |
|
19.3 |
|
|
21.0
|
Total other current assets |
$ |
273.6 |
|
$ |
289.2
|
Property, Plant and
Equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
Land |
$ |
37.1 |
|
$ |
37.7
|
Buildings |
|
275.2 |
|
|
267.4
|
Machinery and
equipment |
|
1,588.8 |
|
|
1,512.0
|
Construction in
progress |
|
82.9 |
|
|
157.7
|
Total gross property |
|
1,984.0 |
|
|
1,974.8
|
Accumulated
depreciation |
|
(1,145.3) |
|
|
(1,111.4) |
Total net property, plant and equipment |
$ |
838.7 |
|
$ |
863.4
|
Other Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
Pension
asset |
$ |
7.8 |
|
$ |
4.8
|
Deferred charges
and other assets |
|
30.4 |
|
|
40.2
|
Total other assets |
$ |
38.2 |
|
$ |
45.0
|
Other Current
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued
advertising, promotion and allowances |
$ |
271.5 |
|
$ |
281.2
|
Accrued salaries,
vacations and incentive compensation |
|
74.8 |
|
|
92.3
|
Returns
reserve |
|
28.5 |
|
|
46.6
|
Other |
|
180.1 |
|
|
237.7
|
Total other current liabilities |
$ |
554.9 |
|
$ |
657.8
|
Other Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
Pensions and
other retirement benefits |
$ |
273.3 |
|
$ |
280.0
|
Deferred
compensation |
|
137.2 |
|
|
141.3
|
Deferred income
tax liabilities |
|
460.5 |
|
|
450.8
|
Other non-current
liabilities |
|
68.4 |
|
|
66.6
|
Total other liabilities |
$ |
939.4 |
|
$ |
938.7
|
Note 13 – Recently Issued Accounting
Pronouncements
On
January 1, 2010, we adopted the FASB issued accounting standard update (ASU) to
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. This guidance requires new disclosures
and clarifies existing disclosure requirements about fair value measurement.
Specifically, the Company is required to disclose separately the amounts of
significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements
and to also describe the reasons for the transfers. See Note 10 of the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements.
On January 1,
2010, we adopted the FASB issued ASU on
subsequent events. This new guidance amended the previously issued guidance on
subsequent events and removes the requirement for SEC filers to disclose the
date through which the entity has evaluated subsequent events.
Note 14 – Legal
Proceedings/Contingencies
The Company and its subsidiaries are parties to a number of legal
proceedings in various jurisdictions arising out of the operations of the
Energizer business. Many of these legal matters are in preliminary stages and
involve complex issues of law and fact, and may proceed for protracted periods
of time. The amount of liability, if any, from these proceedings cannot be
determined with certainty. However, based upon present information, the Company
believes that its ultimate liability, if any, arising from pending legal
proceedings, asserted legal claims and known potential legal claims which are
likely to be asserted, are not reasonably likely to be material to the Company’s
financial position, results of operations, or cash flows, taking into account
established accruals for estimated liabilities.
16
Energizer Holdings,
Inc.
Items 2 and 3. Management’s Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, and Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Highlights / Operating Results
The following discussion is a summary of
the key factors management considers necessary in reviewing the Company’s
historical basis results of operations, operating segment results, and liquidity
and capital resources. Statements in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations that are not historical may be
considered forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. See “Forward-Looking Statements”
presented later in this section. This discussion should be read in conjunction
with the accompanying unaudited financial statements and notes thereto for the
quarter and six months ended March 31, 2010 and the Company’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009.
Net Earnings for the Company for the
quarter ended March 31, 2010 were $88.5, or $1.25 per diluted share, compared to
$77.0, or $1.30 per diluted share, for the same quarter last year. Earnings per
share are down somewhat versus the prior year quarter despite higher net
earnings in the fiscal 2010 quarter as an increase in the weighted average
shares outstanding as a result of the completion of the sale of an additional
10.9 million common shares on May 20, 2009, reduced diluted earnings per share
by $0.24 on a comparative basis. The current quarter results include the
following items:
- A favorable adjustment of
$2.8 after-tax, or $0.03 per diluted share related to foreign exchange gains
and a tax benefit associated with currency devaluation, partially offset by
the negative impact of highly inflationary accounting, all of which relate to
our Venezuela affiliate; and
- Costs associated with
integration and certain other realignment activities of $1.1 after-tax, or
$0.01 per diluted share.
The prior year quarter results
include the following items:
- A favorable adjustment of
$14.5 after-tax, or $0.25 per diluted share, resulting from a change in the
policy under which Energizer colleagues earn and vest in the Company’s paid
time-off (PTO) benefit; and
- Costs associated with the
Playtex integration and certain other realignment activities of $4.2
after-tax, or $0.07 per diluted share.
Net Earnings for the six months ended
March 31, 2010 were $214.2, or $3.04 per diluted share, compared to $188.0, or
$3.18 per diluted share for the same period last year. Earnings per share are
down somewhat versus the prior year six month period despite higher net earnings
in the fiscal 2010 quarter as an increase in the weighted average shares
outstanding as a result of the completion of the sale of additional common
shares in fiscal 2009, as noted above, reduced diluted earnings per share by
$0.58 on a comparative basis. The current six months include the following
items:
- A charge of $22.7 after-tax,
or $0.32 per diluted share, related to the devaluation of our Venezuela
affiliate’s U.S. dollar intercompany payable from the official rate to the
parallel rate and the negative impact of highly inflationary accounting, which
was effective beginning in the second quarter for Venezuela; and
- Integration and other
realignment costs of $5.6, after-tax, or $0.08 per diluted share.
The prior year six months include
the following items:
- The favorable impact of the
change in the PTO policy of $14.5 after-tax, or $0.25 per diluted share;
and
- Costs associated with the
Playtex integration and certain other realignment activities of $7.2,
after-tax, or $0.11 per diluted share.
17
For the following discussions regarding
operating results, including the discussion of segment results for the quarter
and six month periods, all references to the impact of currencies are exclusive
of Venezuela. The impact of the Venezuela devaluation and related activities is
disclosed separately, where it is believed to be a relevant factor to
understanding the operating results.
Net sales for the quarter ended March 31,
2010 increased $54.7, or 6%, due primarily to the favorable impact of
currencies, which positively impacted the year-over-year comparison by
approximately $41 and the inclusion of Edge and Skintimate shave preparations,
which added $32 to net sales for the quarter. These increases were partially
offset by lower net sales for Venezuela of approximately $13 due to the impact
of the devaluation, partially offset by favorable pricing actions in the local
market.
For the six months ended March 31, 2010,
net sales increased $188.9, or 10%, due to the impact of currencies, which
positively impacted the year-over-year comparison by approximately $86, and the
inclusion of Edge and Skintimate shave preparations, which added $66 to net
sales. See “Segment Results” below for further details for the quarter and six
month sales.
Gross profit for the quarter ended March
31, 2010 increased $33.6, or 8%, due primarily to the favorable impact of
currencies of approximately $35. The Venezuela devaluation had a negative impact
of approximately $6 for the quarter. Gross margin as a percent of net sales was
47.8%, which was favorably impacted by 170 basis points due to currencies, for
the quarter ended March 31, 2010. This compares to 47.0% for the same quarter in
the prior year. It should be noted that the prior year gross margin percentage
was favorably impacted by approximately 130 basis points due to the favorable
PTO policy adjustment noted above.
For the six months ended March 31, 2010,
gross profit increased $80.3 or 9% due primarily to the favorable impact of
currencies of approximately $62. Gross margin as a percent of net sales was
47.7%, which was favorably impacted by 100 basis points due to currencies, for
the six months ended March 31, 2010. This is compared to 48.2% for the same
period in the prior year. The prior period gross margin percentage was favorably
impacted by approximately 60 basis points due to the favorable PTO policy
adjustment noted above.
Selling, general and administrative
expense (SG&A) increased $29.8 for the quarter as compared to the same
period in the prior year due primarily to the unfavorable impact of currencies
of approximately $8 and the favorable impact in the prior year quarter of the
portion of the favorability in the PTO policy included in SG&A, which was
$11.9. For the six months ended March 31, 2010, SG&A increased $39.8 due
primarily to unfavorable currencies of approximately $15, and the prior year
favorable impact of the change in the PTO policy noted above.
Advertising and promotion (A&P)
expense decreased $2.9, or 4%, for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 due
primarily to the timing of spending. A&P for the quarter ended March 31,
2010 was 8.2% of net sales versus 9.1% of net sales for the same quarter last
year.
For the six months ended March 31, 2010,
A&P decreased $11.3, or 6%, due primarily to the timing of spending,
partially offset by unfavorable currencies of approximately $8. A&P for the
six months ended March 31, 2010 was 7.8% of net sales versus 9.2% of net sales
for the period last year.
As noted in prior filings, the Company
expects A&P for the full fiscal year 2010 to be in the range of 11 - 12% of
net sales. As a result, A&P as a percentage of net sales is expected to be
significantly higher for the remainder of the year due, in part, to spending
support behind the launch of the Company’s new Schick Hydro product line and
increased spending behind Edge and Skintimate shave preparations.
18
Research and development expense
increased $2.0, or 9%, for the quarter and $3.5, or 8%, for the six months ended
March 31, 2010 due to our stated intention to increase investment in support of
our innovation initiatives.
Interest expense was $32.3, a decrease of
$3.4, or 10%, as compared to the prior year quarter. For the six months ended
March 31, 2010, interest expense was $64.3, down $10.4 as compared to the same
period in the prior year. The decrease in both the quarter and the six month
comparatives are due primarily to lower average debt outstanding.
Other financing income was $1.5 for the
quarter including a foreign exchange gain, net of the negative impact of highly
inflationary accounting, of $1.3 related to Venezuela. The Company settled
approximately $9 of U.S. dollar based intercompany payables of our Venezuela
affiliate at the devalued official rate. The Company previously assumed that
these liabilities would be settled at the parallel rate at December 31, 2009.
This gain due to the improved exchange rate for the settled intercompany
payables was partially offset by a $1.3 charge related to the negative impact of
highly inflationary accounting in the quarter as net monetary assets denominated
in local currency were devalued due to an increase in the parallel rate during
the quarter. At March 31, 2010, the parallel rate for Venezuela was
7.05.
For the six months ended March 31, 2010,
other financing costs were $34.1 driven by the impact of the Venezuela
devaluation and the negative impact of highly inflationary accounting, which
contributed $24.2 of the overall costs. The remaining costs included in other
financing costs are primarily losses incurred to settle foreign exchange hedging
contracts, which were more than offset by currency favorability in gross margin.
Income taxes were $39.8, or 31.0%, of
pre-tax income for the second quarter of fiscal 2010 as compared to 31.9% for
the same quarter in fiscal 2009. The second quarter of fiscal 2010 includes a
$1.5 tax benefit related to the Venezuela devaluation, which reduced the
effective rate for the quarter. For the six months ended March 31, 2010, incomes
taxes were $112.6, or 34.5%, of pre-tax income. This includes a pre-tax charge
of $24.2 ($22.7 after-tax) related to currency devaluation and highly
inflationary accounting in Venezuela. Exclusive of the impact of Venezuela, the
Company’s effective tax rate was 32.5% as compared to 31.8% for the same period
in fiscal 2009.
The Company remains on track to deliver
the savings expected from the fiscal 2009 voluntary enhanced retirement option
and reduction in force programs. We estimate that total annualized savings for
the programs will be approximately $18 to $20 once fully achieved, with
approximately $14 of savings expected in fiscal 2010.
Recent Developments
Hydro Launch
In February 2010, the Company
announced the launch of a new Schick men’s razor system, Schick Hydro. Schick
Hydro is available in
three- and five-blade models. Schick Hydro shave gels are also available in
Moisturizing and Sensitive Skin varieties. As noted above, the Company will
increase A&P expenses in the second half of fiscal 2010 due, in part, to
support this launch.
19
Venezuela Devaluation
At December 31, 2009, the Company
determined that the parallel rate was the appropriate rate to use for the
translation of our Venezuela affiliate’s financial statements for the purposes
of consolidation based on the facts and circumstances of our business, including
the fact that the parallel rate is the current method used to settle U.S. dollar
invoices for newly imported product and the Company has not remitted dividends
to the U.S. for an extended time period. While we continue to pursue the payment
of the affiliate’s legacy $31 outstanding U.S. dollar intercompany payable via
approvals to convert local currency to U.S. dollars at the recently devalued
official rate, we devalued this payable to the parallel rate at December 31,
2009, which was 6.00, given the aging of the payable. In the second quarter,
approximately $9 of this legacy intercompany payable was settled via approvals
from local authorities to convert local currency to U.S. dollars at rates
ranging between 2.60 and 4.30. Since these approvals were at a lower rate than
6.00, the Company recorded a $2.8 foreign exchange gain in the second quarter,
which partially offset the devaluation loss recorded in the first quarter. To
date, the following summarizes certain Venezuela impacts:
- We recorded a net after-tax
charge of $21.4, or $0.30 per diluted share for the six months ended March 31,
2010 due primarily to the devaluation of the legacy U.S. dollar intercompany
payable to the parallel rate, partially offset by the settlement gains noted
above. The impact reflects the potentially higher local currency cost, which
may be required to settle the U.S. dollar denominated intercompany invoices if
our efforts to procure approvals under the official rate remain unsuccessful.
This negative impact is improved somewhat from the amount reported in the
first quarter due to the second quarter foreign currency gain noted above and
the recording of a $1.5 tax benefit in the second quarter, and
- We recorded a pre and
after-tax charge of $1.3, or $0.02 per diluted share, due to the negative
impact of highly inflationary accounting in the second quarter of 2010. This
charge relates to the devaluation of our net monetary assets denominated in
local currency due to an increase in the parallel rate during the quarter.
As noted in our first quarter disclosure,
effective January 1, 2010, the financial statements for our Venezuela subsidiary
are consolidated under the rules governing the translation of financial
information in a highly inflationary economy based on the use of the blended
National Consumer Price Index in Venezuela. Under U.S. GAAP, an economy is
considered highly inflationary if the cumulative inflation rate for a three year
period meets or exceeds 100 percent. If a subsidiary is considered to be in a
highly inflationary economy, the financial statements of the subsidiary must be
re-measured into the company’s reporting currency (U.S. dollar) and future
exchange gains and losses from the re-measurement of monetary assets and
liabilities are reflected in current earnings, rather than exclusively in the
equity section of the balance sheet, until such time as the economy is no longer
considered highly inflationary. For the second quarter, the devaluation of the
net monetary assets was $1.3. It is difficult to determine what, if any, impact
the use of highly inflationary accounting for Venezuela may have on our
consolidated financial statements in subsequent quarters as the impact is
dependent upon movements in the applicable exchange rates between the local
currency and the U.S. dollar and the amount of monetary assets and liabilities
included in our affiliate’s balance sheet. At March 31, 2010, the U.S. dollar
value of monetary assets, net of monetary liabilities, which would be subject to
an earnings impact from translation rate movements for our Venezuela affiliate
was approximately $12.
As noted previously, our Venezuela
affiliate has a $31 U.S. dollar intercompany payable. While we have devalued
this liability to the parallel rate of 6.00 effective December 31, 2009, it
remains exposed to further risk from fluctuations in the parallel rate as long
as the liability remains an open obligation. Settlement of all or a portion of
the liability at rates above 6.00 will result in an increase in the local
currency value for the liability and a corresponding charge to earnings, while
settlement of all or a portion of the liability at rates below 6.00 will result
in a decrease in the local currency value for the liability and a corresponding
benefit to earnings. We have no way to predict the direction or magnitude of
changes in the parallel rate in the future or at which rate the U.S. dollar
liability will ultimately be settled. At March 31, 2010, the parallel rate for
Venezuela was 7.05.
20
Non-GAAP Financial
Measures
While the Company reports financial
results in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S.
(“GAAP”), this discussion includes non-GAAP measures. These non-GAAP measures,
such as comparison changes excluding the impact of currencies, the acquisition
of Edge and Skintimate shave preparation brands, the Venezuelan devaluation
charge, and the PTO policy change in the prior year are not in accordance with,
nor are they a substitute for, GAAP measures. The Company believes these
non-GAAP measures provide a more meaningful comparison to the corresponding
reported period and assist investors in performing analysis consistent with
financial models developed by research analysts. Investors should consider
non-GAAP measures in addition to, not as a substitute for, or superior to, the
comparable GAAP measures.
Segment Results
Operations for the Company are managed
via two segments - Household Products (Battery and Lighting Products) and
Personal Care (Wet Shave, Skin Care, Feminine Care and Infant Care). Segment
performance is evaluated based on segment operating profit, exclusive of general
corporate expenses, share-based compensation costs, costs associated with most
restructuring, integration or business realignment activities and amortization
of intangible assets. Financial items, such as interest income and expense, are
managed on a global basis at the corporate level.
For the quarter and six months ended
March 31, 2009, cost of products sold and SG&A expense reflected favorable
adjustments of $11.1 and $11.9, respectively, related to the change in policy
governing the Company's PTO. These favorable adjustments were not reflected in
the Household Products or Personal Care segments, but rather presented as a
separate line below segment profit as it was not operational in nature. Such
presentation reflects management's view on how it evaluates segment performance.
The Company’s operating model includes a
combination of stand-alone and combined business functions between the Household
Products and Personal Care businesses, varying by country and region of the
world. Shared functions include product warehousing and distribution, various
transaction processing functions, and in some countries, a combined sales force
and management.
This structure is the basis for
Energizer’s reportable operating segment information, as included in the tables
in Footnote 1 to the Condensed Financial Statements for the quarters and six
months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009.
Household Products
|
Quarter
ended March 31, |
|
Six months ended March 31, |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Net
sales |
$ |
441.8 |
|
$ |
417.1 |
|
$ |
1,145.8 |
|
$ |
1,065.1 |
Segment profit |
$ |
71.9 |
|
$ |
54.9 |
|
$ |
250.7 |
|
$ |
210.1 |
For the quarter, net sales were $441.8,
up $24.7, or 6% versus the same quarter last year, including the favorable
impact of currencies of approximately $22. The impact of favorable currencies
was partially offset by lower net sales of approximately $7 in Venezuela due to
the recent devaluation, net of local pricing actions. Excluding the impact of
currencies and Venezuela, net sales increased approximately $10, or 2%, due
primarily to higher sales in certain international markets. While the premium
alkaline category has shown unit growth versus the prior year quarter, the
dollar value of this category remains flat to slightly negative in this
comparison due to the negative pricing impact of pack upsizing in the U.S.
Overall pricing and product mix was unfavorable by approximately $2 due
primarily to lower pricing in the U.S., partially offset by price increases in
other areas of the world.
Segment profit increased $17.0, including
approximately $14 of favorable currencies and the positive impact of raw
material pricing versus the year ago quarter due, in part, to our commodity
hedging activities. These increases were partially offset by a negative impact
of approximately $4 due to the Venezuela devaluation.
21
For the six months ended March 31, 2010,
net sales increased $80.7 or 8%, including approximately $48 of favorable
currencies. Excluding the favorable impact of currencies, net sales were up 3%
due to higher net sales in certain international markets and a more normalized
shipping timing for the holidays, coupled with a soft prior year comparative in
the first quarter of fiscal 2010.
Segment profit for the six months
increased $40.6 or 19%. Excluding the impact of favorable currencies of
approximately $21, segment profit increased approximately $20 due to favorable
raw material pricing, the margin impact of the higher sales noted above, and the
timing of A&P spending versus a year ago.
While we continually engage in ongoing
reviews of all of our categories, in an effort to provide greater clarity
regarding the ongoing dynamics in the battery category, we have recently
completed a more in-depth analysis. While short term measurements of category
performance may fluctuate, this analysis indicated that an increasing number of
devices are using built-in rechargeable battery systems, particularly in
developed markets. We believe this continues to create a negative impact on the
demand for primary batteries. This trend, coupled with aggressive competitive
activity in the U.S. and other markets, could put additional pressure on segment
results going forward.
Personal Care
|
Quarter
ended March 31, |
|
Six months ended March 31, |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Net
sales |
$ |
493.3 |
|
$ |
463.3 |
|
$ |
966.0 |
|
$ |
857.8 |
Segment profit |
$ |
115.5 |
|
$ |
100.9 |
|
$ |
235.7 |
|
$ |
192.3 |
Net sales for the quarter were $493.3, up
$30.0, or 6% versus the same quarter last year. This increase includes
approximately $19 of favorable currencies and $32 of Edge and Skintimate shave
preparation net sales. These increases were partially offset by lower net sales
from Venezuela of $6 due primarily to currency devaluation partially offset by
local market pricing actions. Excluding these discrete impacts, net sales
declined 3%. Wet Shave net sales declined 8% on lower volumes across all
segments due to the launch of Quattro for Women Trimmer last year, and lower
promotional activity behind men’s systems and disposables. Skin Care sales
increased 2% due to higher shipments of Hawaiian Tropic. This was offset
partially by lower shipments of Wet Ones due to high levels of retail inventory
as consumption related to H1N1 declined. Infant Care sales increased 4% due to
continued growth in Diaper Genie and cups, partially offset by lower sales of
bottles. Finally, Feminine Care sales increased 2% due to higher shipments of
Sport tampons partially offset by lower sales of Gentle Glide.
Segment profit for the quarter was
$115.5, up $14.6 or 14% versus the same quarter in the prior year. Favorable
currencies and the inclusion of Edge and Skintimate brands positively impacted
profit by approximately $10 each.
For the six months ended March 31, 2010,
net sales increased $108.2 or 13%. This increase includes approximately $38 of
favorable currencies and $66 from Edge and Skintimate shave preparations.
Excluding both of these impacts, net sales were essentially flat. Wet Shave
sales decreased 1% on lower sales of disposables and men’s systems. Skin Care
sales increased 5% on higher sales of Hawaiian Tropic. Infant Care sales
increased 4% on continued growth in Diaper Genie and cups, partially offset by
lower sales of bottles. Feminine Care sales decreased 5% as lower sales of
Gentle Glide were partially offset by continued strong growth of
Sport.
Segment profit for the six months
increased $43.4 or 23%. Excluding the impact of favorable currencies of
approximately $19, segment profit increased approximately $23 due to the
inclusion of Edge and Skintimate shave preparations, as profits for these
products for fiscal 2010 are concentrated in the first half due to the timing of
A&P activities.
22
General Corporate and Other Expenses
|
|
Quarter
ended March 31, |
|
Six months ended March 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
General
Corporate Expenses |
|
$
|
23.4 |
|
|
$
|
14.6 |
|
|
$
|
46.0 |
|
|
$
|
30.7 |
|
Integration |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
General Corporate Expenses with
Integration |
|
|
24.3 |
|
|
|
16.3 |
|
|
|
48.6 |
|
|
|
33.8 |
|
Restructuring and Related
Charges |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
General Corporate and Other
Expenses |
|
$ |
24.9 |
|
|
$ |
21.0 |
|
|
$ |
54.4 |
|
|
$ |
41.7 |
|
% of total net sales |
|
|
2.7 |
% |
|
|
2.4 |
% |
|
|
2.6 |
% |
|
|
2.2 |
% |
For the quarter ended March 31,
2010, general corporate and other expenses were $24.9, up $3.9, due primarily to
quarter over quarter changes in deferred compensation liabilities and higher
amortization of stock awards. These increases were partially offset by lower
restructuring and realignment costs in the fiscal 2010 second quarter. Corporate
and other expenses were $54.4, up $12.7, for the six months ended March 31, 2010
as compared to the same period in the prior year due primarily to changes in
deferred compensation liabilities and higher amortization of stock awards.
Consistent with its historical actions, the Company may engage in further cost
reductions to optimize its operating performance, which could result in future
charges.
Liquidity and Capital
Resources
Cash flow from operations is the primary
funding source for operating needs and capital investments. Cash flow from
operations increased by $148.0 to $274.2 for the six months ended March 31, 2010
as compared to $126.2 for the same period last year. Increased operating
earnings before changes in working capital contributed approximately $89 to this
increase. It should be noted that $24.7 of this increase was due to a deposit
made by the Company in the prior year six month period related to its share
option contract, which is in place to mitigate the impact of changes in certain
of the Company’s deferred compensation liabilities. This deposit is reported in
fiscal 2009 cash flow on the Other, net line in the Statement of Cash Flows and
discussed below under “Market Risk – Stock Price Exposure.” A similar deposit
was not required in fiscal 2010. In addition, cash flow from changes in working
capital improved by approximately $59 for the six months ended March 31, 2010.
The biggest driver in the improved working capital result was the investment in
inventory, which decreased by approximately $13 during the first six months of
2010 as compared to an increase of approximately $80 for the same period last
year.
Capital expenditures were $48.5 for the
six months ended March 31, 2010 and $75.7 for the same period last year. Full
year capital expenditures are estimated to be approximately $140 to $150 for
2010.
The Company’s total borrowings were
$2,414.0 at March 31, 2010, of which $184.0, net of the interest rate swap, is
tied to variable interest rates. The Company maintains total committed debt
facilities of $2,904.0, of which $477.4 remained available as of March 31,
2010.
Under the terms of the Company’s credit
agreements, the ratio of the Company’s indebtedness to its EBITDA, as defined in
the agreements, cannot be greater than 4.00 to 1, and may not remain above 3.50
to 1 for more than four consecutive quarters. If and so long as the ratio is
above 3.50 to 1 for any period, the Company is required to pay additional
interest expense for the period in which the ratio exceeds 3.50 to 1. The
interest rate margin and certain fees vary depending on the indebtedness to
EBITDA ratio. Under the Company’s private placement note agreements, the ratio
of indebtedness to EBITDA may not exceed 4.0 to 1. However, if the ratio is
above 3.50 to 1, the Company is required to pay an additional 75 basis points in
interest for the period in which the ratio exceeds 3.50 to 1. In addition, under
the credit agreements, the ratio of its current year EBIT, as defined in the
agreements, to total interest expense must exceed 3.00 to 1. The Company’s ratio
of indebtedness to its EBITDA was 2.99 to 1, and the ratio of its EBIT to total
interest expense was 5.01 to 1, as of March 31, 2010. Each of the calculations
at March 31, 2010 was pro forma for the Edge/Skintimate shave preparation
acquisition.
23
The Company
anticipates that it will remain in compliance with its debt covenants for the
foreseeable future. The negative impact on EBITDA resulting from the voluntary
retirement (VERO) and reduction in force (RIF) charges in the fourth quarter of
2009 had a negative impact on the ratio of indebtedness to EBITDA as such
charges are not excluded from the calculation of trailing twelve month EBITDA
under the terms of the agreements. The VERO and RIF charges will negatively
impact trailing twelve month EBITDA, which is used in the ratio, through the
third quarter of fiscal 2010, after which it will roll out of the calculation.
Savings from the VERO and RIF programs will somewhat mitigate the negative
EBITDA impact of the restructuring charges as they are realized during this time
frame, and will remain a positive impact on the ratio going forward. In
addition, the Venezuela devaluation charge of $22.7 is also included in the
trailing twelve month EBITDA calculation at March 31, 2010, and will negatively
impact the ratio of indebtedness to EBITDA for all of fiscal 2010. If the
Company fails to comply with the financial covenants referred to above or with
other requirements of the credit agreements or private placement note
agreements, the lenders would have the right to accelerate the maturity of the
debt. Acceleration under one of these facilities would trigger cross defaults on
other borrowings.
The Company routinely sells a pool of
U.S. accounts receivable through a financing arrangement between Energizer
Receivables Funding Corporation, which is a bankruptcy-remote special purpose
entity subsidiary of the Company, and outside parties (the Conduits). Under the
current structure, funds received from the Conduit are treated as borrowings
rather than proceeds of accounts receivables sold for accounting purposes.
Borrowings under this program, which may not exceed $200, receive favorable
treatment in the Company’s debt compliance covenants. The program renews
annually in May. We can provide no assurance that the facility will be renewable
on an annual basis, or if renewed, it may be done so on less favorable terms. At
March 31, 2010, the Company had no borrowings outstanding under this facility.
The counterparties to long-term committed
borrowings consist of a number of major financial institutions. The Company
continually monitors positions with, and credit ratings of, counterparties both
internally and by using outside ratings agencies. The Company has staggered
long-term borrowing maturities through 2017 to minimize refinancing risk in any
single year and to optimize the use of free cash flow for repayment.
No shares of the Company’s common stock
were purchased during the quarter. The Company has 8 million shares remaining on
the current authorization from its Board of Directors to repurchase its common
stock in the future. Future purchases may be made from time to time on the open
market or through privately negotiated transactions, subject to corporate
objectives and the discretion of management.
A summary of Energizer’s significant
contractual obligations at March 31, 2010 is shown below:
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More than 5 |
|
|
Total |
|
year |
|
1-3
years |
|
3-5
years |
|
years |
|
Long-term debt, including current
maturities |
$ |
2,386.5 |
|
$ |
196.0 |
|
$ |
975.5 |
|
$ |
395.0 |
|
$ |
820.0 |
|
Interest on long-term debt |
|
533.7 |
|
|
112.7 |
|
|
188.5 |
|
|
130.7 |
|
|
101.8 |
|
Operating leases |
|
75.3 |
|
|
23.1 |
|
|
26.2 |
|
|
14.9 |
|
|
11.1 |
|
Purchase obligations and other (1) |
|
99.5 |
|
|
69.1 |
|
|
19.3 |
|
|
11.1 |
|
|
- |
|
Total |
$ |
3,095.0 |
|
$ |
400.9 |
|
$ |
1,209.5 |
|
$ |
551.7 |
|
$ |
932.9 |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The Company
has estimated approximately $3.5 of cash settlements associated with
unrecognized tax benefits within the next year, which are included in the
table above. As of March 31, 2010, the Company’s Consolidated Balance
Sheet reflects a liability for unrecognized tax benefits of approximately
$47 excluding interest and penalties. The contractual obligations table
above does not include this liability. Due to the high degree of
uncertainty regarding the timing of future cash outflows of liabilities
for unrecognized tax benefits beyond one year, a reasonable estimate of
the period of cash settlement for periods beyond the next twelve months
cannot be made, and thus is not included in this
table. |
24
The Company has
contractual purchase obligations for future purchases, which generally extend
one to three months. These obligations are primarily purchase orders at fair
value that are part of normal operations and are reflected in historical
operating cash flow trends. In addition, the Company has various commitments
related to service and supply contracts that contain penalty provisions for
early termination. As of March 31, 2010, we do not believe such purchase
obligations or termination penalties will have a significant effect on our
results of operations, financial position or liquidity position in the
future.
In addition, the above contractual
obligations table does not include minimum contributions related to the
Company’s retirement programs as they are not considered material to the cash
flow and liquidity of the Company for any given fiscal year presented. The U.S.
pension plans constitute more than 70% of the total benefit obligations and plan
assets for the Company’s pension plans. At this time, we do not believe that a
minimum pension contribution for the U.S. plan will be required before fiscal
2012, and, we do not believe such a minimum payment, if any, will be material to
the Company’s liquidity or cash flow based on current discount rates, expected
return on plan assets and plan design.
The Company believes that cash flows from
operating activities and periodic borrowings under existing credit facilities
will be adequate to meet short-term and long-term liquidity requirements prior
to the maturity of the Company's credit facilities, although no guarantee can be
given in this regard.
Market Risk
Currency Rate Exposure
A significant portion of our product cost
is more closely tied to the U.S. dollar and, to a lesser extent, the Euro, than
to the local currencies in which the product is sold. As such, a weakening of
currencies relative to the U.S. dollar and, to a lesser extent, the Euro,
results in margin declines unless mitigated through pricing actions, which are
not always available due to the competitive and economic environment.
Conversely, strengthening of currencies relative to the U.S. dollar and, to a
lesser extent, the Euro can improve margins. This margin impact coupled with the
translation of foreign operating results to the U.S. dollar, our financial
reporting currency, has an impact on reported operating profits. Changes in the
value of local currencies in relation to the U.S. dollar, and, to a lesser
extent, the Euro will continue to impact reported sales and segment
profitability in the future, and we cannot predict the direction or magnitude of
future changes.
Excluding Venezuela, and based on current
foreign exchange rates, we estimate currencies will be favorable by
approximately $15 to $20, net of the impact of hedging activities, through the
balance of the fiscal year versus the same period in the prior year. We cannot
predict how foreign exchange rates will move in the future and how such
movements will affect this estimate.
The Company generally views its
investments in foreign subsidiaries with a functional currency other than the
U.S. dollar as long-term. As a result, the Company does not generally hedge
these net investments. Capital structuring techniques are used to manage the net
investment in foreign currencies, as necessary. Additionally, the Company
attempts to limit its U.S. dollar net monetary liabilities in countries with
unstable currencies.
From time to time the Company may employ
foreign currency hedging techniques to mitigate potential losses in earnings or
cash flows on foreign currency transactions, which primarily consist of
anticipated intercompany purchase transactions and intercompany borrowings.
External purchase transactions and intercompany dividends and service fees with
foreign currency risk may also be hedged. The primary currencies to which the
Company’s foreign affiliates are exposed include the U.S. dollar, the Euro, the
Yen, the British pound, the Canadian dollar and the Australian dollar.
25
The Company enters into foreign currency
derivative contracts to hedge existing balance sheet exposures. Any losses on
these contracts would be fully offset by exchange gains on the underlying
exposures, thus they are not subject to significant market risk. The change in
fair value of the foreign currency contracts for the quarter and six months
ended March 31, 2010 resulted in expense of $3.8 and $6.0, respectively, and for
the quarter and six months ended March 31, 2009 resulted in income of $4.5 and
$1.4, respectively, and was recorded in other financing items. In addition, the
Company has entered into a series of forward currency contracts to hedge the
cash flow uncertainty of forecasted inventory purchases due to short term
currency fluctuations. These transactions are accounted for as cash flow hedges.
At March 31, 2010, the Company had an unrealized pre-tax gain on these forward
currency contracts accounted for as cash flow hedges of $0.8 included in
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss. Contract maturities for these hedges
extend into 2012.
Commodity Price
Exposure
The Company uses raw materials that
are subject to price volatility. At times, hedging instruments are used by the
Company to reduce exposure to variability in cash flows associated with future
purchases of zinc or other commodities. The fair market value of the Company’s
outstanding hedging instruments included in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
was an unrealized pre-tax gain of $5.5 and an unrecognized pre-tax loss of $4.2
at March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Over the next twelve months,
approximately $5.2 of the gain recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive
Loss will be included in earnings. Contract maturities for these hedges extend
into fiscal year 2011. There were 15 open contracts at March 31,
2010.
Commodity and raw material prices have
increased in recent months. However, our hedging activities and supply contract
terms should delay the negative impact on product cost through the remainder of
fiscal 2010. As a result, we expect raw material and commodity costs to be $8 to
$10 favorable over the balance of the fiscal year as compared to the same period
last year.
Interest Rate
Exposure
The Company has interest rate risk with
respect to interest expense on variable rate debt. At March 31, 2010, the
Company had $484.0 of variable rate debt outstanding, of which $300 is hedged
via an interest rate swap as disclosed below. As a result, after giving effect
to the hedged amount, a hypothetical one percentage point increase in variable
interest rates would have an annual unfavorable impact of approximately $1.8 on
the Company’s earnings before taxes and cash flows, based upon the current
variable debt level at March 31, 2010.
During 2009, the Company entered into
interest rate swap agreements with two major financial institutions that fixed
the variable benchmark component (LIBOR) of the Company’s interest rate on $300
of the Company’s variable rate debt for the next three years at 1.9%. These
hedging instruments are considered cash flow hedges for accounting purposes. At
March 31, 2010, the Company had an unrecognized pre-tax loss on these interest
rate swap agreements of $1.8 included in Accumulated Other Comprehensive
Loss.
Stock Price
Exposure
At March 31, 2010, the Company held a
share option with a major financial institution to mitigate the impact of
changes in certain of the Company’s deferred compensation liabilities, which are
tied to the Company’s common stock price. The fair market value of the share
option was $0.6 as included in other current liabilities and $7.4 as included in
other current assets at March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The change in
fair value of the total share option for the quarter and six months ended March
31, 2010 resulted in income of $1.0 and expense of $2.6, respectively, and for
the quarter and six months ended March 31, 2009 resulted in expense of $3.2 and
$14.9, respectively, and was recorded in SG&A. Period activity related to
the share option is classified in the same category in the cash flow statement
as the period activity associated with the Company’s deferred compensation
liability, which was cash flow from operations.
26
Forward-Looking Statements
This document contains both historical
and forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are not based on
historical facts but instead reflect our expectations, estimates or projections
concerning future results or events. These statements generally can be
identified by the use of forward-looking words or phrases such as “believe,”
“expect,” “anticipate,” “may,” “could,” “intend,” “intent,” “belief,”
“estimate,” “plan,” “foresee,” “likely,” “will,” “should” or other similar words
or phrases. These statements are not guarantees of performance and are
inherently subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and assumptions
that are difficult to predict and could cause our actual results, performance or
achievements to differ materially from those expressed in or indicated by those
statements. We cannot assure you that any of our expectations, estimates or
projections will be achieved.
The forward-looking statements included
in this document are only made as of the date of this document and we disclaim
any obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statement to reflect
subsequent events or circumstances.
Numerous factors could cause our actual
results and events to differ materially from those expressed or implied by
forward-looking statements, including, without limitation:
- risks associated with the current
economic environment and credit crisis;
- failure to generate sufficient cash to
service our indebtedness, invest as desired, and grow our
business;
- limitations imposed by various
covenants in our indebtedness;
- our ability to successfully access
capital markets and ensure adequate liquidity during the current unsettled
economic environment;
- the extent to which our lenders have
suffered losses related to the weakening economy that would impair their
ability to fund our borrowings;
- our ability to continue to develop new
products;
- our ability to execute our business
strategy, achieve profitability, or maintain relationships with existing
customers in our competitive industries;
- the impact of economic conditions,
changes in technology, and device trends on demand for our
products;
- the impact of changes in foreign,
cultural, political, and financial market conditions on our international
operations;
- the effect of currency
fluctuations;
- changes in our raw material costs or
disruptions in the supply of raw materials;
- our ability to generate sufficient cash
flow to support carrying values of our goodwill, trademarks, other intangible
assets, and other long-lived assets;
- competitive promotional, pricing or
product innovation activity, retailer inventory reductions or product
placement decisions, and loss of significant retailer customers;
- the effect of regulation on our
business in the U.S. and abroad, including the effect of new or increased
taxes on earnings of our various businesses and affiliates;
- events that may disrupt our
manufacturing facilities or supply channels;
- the extent of product liability and
other claims against us;
- changes in the funding obligations for
our pension plan;
- the resolution of our tax contingencies
and the extent to which they result in additional tax
liabilities;
- our ability to adequately protect our
intellectual property rights;
- the impact of cost reduction measures
on our competitive position;
- our ability to continue to make
strategic acquisitions and achieve the desired financial benefits;
and
- the impact of any restructuring and
realignment initiatives.
The list of factors
above is illustrative, but by no means exhaustive. All forward-looking
statements should be evaluated with the understanding of their inherent
uncertainty.
27
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Energizer maintains a system of
disclosure controls and procedures which are designed to ensure that information
required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports filed or submitted under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and is
accumulated and communicated to management, including the Company’s certifying
officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure. Based on an evaluation performed, the Company’s certifying officers
have concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of
March 31, 2010, to provide reasonable assurance of the achievement of these
objectives. Notwithstanding the foregoing, there can be no assurance that the
Company’s disclosure controls and procedures will detect or uncover all failures
of persons within the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries to report
material information otherwise required to be set forth in the Company’s
reports.
There was no change in the Company’s
internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended March 31,
2010, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
There is no information required to
be reported under any items except those indicated below.
Item 1 — Legal Proceedings
The Company and its subsidiaries are
parties to a number of legal proceedings in various jurisdictions arising out of
the operations of the Energizer business. Many of these legal matters are in
preliminary stages and involve complex issues of law and fact, and may proceed
for protracted periods of time. The amount of liability, if any, from these
proceedings cannot be determined with certainty. However, based upon present
information, Energizer believes that its ultimate liability, if any, arising
from pending legal proceedings, asserted legal claims and known potential legal
claims which are likely to be asserted, are not reasonably likely to be material
to Energizer’s financial position, results of operations, or cash flows, taking
into account established accruals for estimated liabilities.
Item 2 — Unregistered Sales of Equity
Securities and Use of Proceeds
No shares of Energizer Common Stock were
acquired by Energizer during the quarter ended March 31, 2010.
Item 6 — Exhibits
See the Exhibit
Index hereto.
28
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the
requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly
authorized.
ENERGIZER HOLDINGS,
INC. |
|
|
Registrant |
|
|
By:
|
|
|
Daniel J.
Sescleifer
|
|
Executive Vice President and
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
Date: April 30,
2010
29
EXHIBIT INDEX
The exhibits below are numbered in accordance with the Exhibit Table of
Item 601 of Regulation S-K.
Exhibit |
|
|
No. |
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
3.1 |
|
|
Articles of Incorporation of
Energizer Holdings, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to
Amendment No. 3 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10 (File
No. 1-15401 (filed on March 16, 2000)). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of
Energizer Holdings, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the
Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Period Ended June 30,
2009). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
Rights Agreement between Energizer
Holdings, Inc. and Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as
Rights Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Post-Effective
Amendment No. 1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10 (File
No. 1-15401) (filed on April 19, 2000)). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
Description of Compensatory
Arrangements of Chairman of Board of Directors (incorporated by reference
to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 26,
2010). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31(i)* |
|
|
Certification of periodic financial
report by the Chief Executive Officer of Energizer Holdings, Inc. pursuant
to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31(ii)* |
|
|
Certification of periodic financial
report by the Chief Financial Officer of Energizer Holdings, Inc. pursuant
to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32(i)* |
|
|
Certification of periodic financial
report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, by the Chief Executive Officer of
Energizer Holdings, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32(ii)* |
|
|
Certification of periodic financial
report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, by the Chief Financial Officer of
Energizer Holdings, Inc. |
30