We intend to fund our continuing operations through increased sales. Additionally, the issuance of debt or equity financing arrangements may be required to fund expenditures or other cash requirements. On February 24, 2011 we sold 533,333 shares of common stock and 266,667 warrants for total cash proceeds of $200,000. On October 4, 2011 we granted 2,000,000 shares of common stock, valued at $0.40 per share, as a part of the value for the acquisition of Prime Table Games’ assets.

Despite this prior funding, there can be no assurance that we will be successful in raising additional funding, if required. If we are not able to secure additional funding, the implementation of our business plan may be impaired.  There can be no assurance that such additional financing will be available to us on acceptable terms or at all.  We will from time to time acquire products and businesses complementary to our business.  As a public entity, we may issue shares of our common stock and preferred stock in private or public offerings to obtain financing, capital or to acquire other businesses that can improve our performance and growth.  To the extent that we seek to acquire other businesses in exchange for our common stock, fluctuations in our stock price could have a material adverse effect on our ability to complete acquisitions.

Off balance sheet arrangements. As of December 31, 2011 there were no off balance sheet arrangements.

Significant equipment. We do not anticipate the purchase of any significant equipment for the next twelve months.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES BOUT MARKET RISK

A smaller reporting company is not required to provide the information required by this Item.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Index to Financial Statements Required by Article 8 of Regulation S-X:

Silberstein Ungar, PLLC CPAs and Business Advisors

Phone (248) 203-0080

Fax (248) 281-0940

30600 Telegraph Road, Suite 2175

Bingham Farms, MI 48025-4586

www.sucpas.com

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors

Galaxy Gaming, Inc.

Las Vegas, Nevada

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Galaxy Gaming, Inc. as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the related statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company has determined that it is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Galaxy Gaming, Inc. as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 and the results of its operations and cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

/s/ Silberstein Ungar, PLLC

Silberstein Ungar, PLLC

Bingham Farms, Michigan

April 14, 2012

GALAXY GAMING, INC.

BALANCE SHEETS

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

GALAXY GAMING, INC.

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

GALAXY GAMING, INC.

STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2011

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

GALAXY GAMING, INC.

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011 AND 2010

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

GALAXY GAMING, INC.

Notes to Financial Statements

December 31, 2011

NOTE 1. NATURE OF OPERATIONS

History of business entities. On January 1, 2007, Galaxy Gaming, LLC (“GGLLC”), a Nevada limited liability company, entered into several agreements with the original Galaxy Gaming, Inc., a Nevada privately held corporation (“GGPVT”).  GGPVT was incorporated in the State of Nevada on December 29, 2006, and acquired the business operations of one or more companies using the “Galaxy Gaming” moniker. Pursuant to these agreements, GGLLC sold selected assets, such as inventory and fixed assets, to GGPVT.  On December 31, 2007, GGPVT acquired, through an asset purchase agreement, GGLLC’s remaining intellectual property including patents, patent applications, trademarks, trademark applications, copyrights, know-how and trade secrets related to the casino gaming services including but not limited to games, side bets, inventions and ideas. GGPVT also acquired the existing client base from GGLLC.

Secured Diversified Investment, Ltd. Secured Diversified Investment, Ltd., a publically held Nevada corporation (“SDI”), was served with an involuntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nevada, Case No. 08-16332.  The Bankruptcy Court’s Order for Relief was entered on July 30, 2008.  By order entered January 27, 2009, the Bankruptcy Court confirmed SDI’s Plan of Reorganization (“Plan”). On February 10, 2009, SDI entered into a share exchange agreement with GGPVT (the “Reverse Merger”). In connection with the Reverse Merger, SDI obtained 100% of the issued and outstanding shares of GGPVT and GGPVT became a wholly-owned subsidiary of SDI.  Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Reverse Merger and the terms of the Plan, SDI issued 25,000,000 shares of common stock pro-rata to the former shareholders of GGPVT in exchange for obtaining ownership of 100% of the issued and outstanding shares of GGPVT”).   SDI also issued 4,000,006 shares of new common stock on a pro rata basis to its creditors in exchange for the discharge of its outstanding debts under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.  All of SDI’s issued and outstanding equity interests existing prior to the Reverse Merger were extinguished and rendered null and void.  Immediately following these events there were 29,000,006 shares of common stock issued and outstanding. Following the closing of the share exchange agreement, SDI discontinued all prior operations and focused exclusively on the business and operations of its wholly-owned subsidiary, GGPVT.  On September 1, 2009, our Board approved a merger of SDI with its subsidiary, GGPVT, pursuant to Nevada Revised Statute. §92A.180 (“Short Form Merger”) and the merged company was named “Galaxy Gaming, Inc.”

Description of business. We design, manufacture and market casino table games and electronic jackpot bonus system platforms played in land-based and cruise ship gaming establishments.  The game concepts and the intellectual property associated with these games are typically protected by patents, trademarks and/or copyrights.  We market our products and license our intellectual property via our own sales force to casinos and to cruise ships worldwide.  Revenues come primarily from recurring royalties received from our clients for the licensing of game content and other fees paid based upon the performance of our electronic platforms.  Additionally, we receive revenue as reimbursement from the sale of our associated products.

On February 21, 2011, we entered into a definitive agreement with TableMAX Corporation (TMAX) a provider of electronic table games and platforms headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada. Under the terms of the agreement, we have exclusive worldwide rights (excluding one international and two U.S. territories) to the TMAX electronic gaming platform and certain game titles. See Note 18 in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary data” included in this Form 10-K.

On October 1, 2011, we executed an asset purchase agreement (“Prime Agreement”) with Prime Table Games LLC and Prime Table Games UK (collectively “Prime Table Games”). Under the terms of the Prime Agreement we acquired over 20 different table games, including 21+3, Two-way Hold'em and Three Card Poker, which are currently played on approximately 500 tables in 200 casinos in the United States, the United Kingdom and in the Caribbean. (Three Card Poker rights are limited to the British Isles.) The intellectual property portfolio includes 46 patents and patents pending, 96 worldwide trademark and design registrations and 47 domain name registrations. See Note 18 in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary data” included in this Form 10-K.

On November 1, 2011, we entered into an asset purchase agreement (the “Lakes Agreement”) with Lakes Entertainment, Inc., a Minnesota corporation (“Lakes”). Included in the acquisition are nine patents, various trademarks and four casino table games known as Bonus Craps, Bonus Roulette, Rainbow Poker and Four the Money. In addition, we received assignment of licensing agreements for approximately 40 placements in 12 casinos. See Note 18 in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary data” included in this Form 10-K. 

GALAXY GAMING, INC.

Notes to Financial Statements

December 31, 2011

NOTE 2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

This summary of our significant accounting policies is presented to assist in understanding our financial statements. The financial statements and notes are representations of our management team, who are responsible for their integrity and objectivity. These accounting policies conform to generally accepted accounting principles and have been consistently applied to the preparation of the financial statements.

Basis of accounting. The financial statements have been prepared on the accrual basis of accounting in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Revenues are recognized as income when earned and expenses are recognized when they are incurred. We do not have significant categories of cost as our income is recurring with high margins. Expenses such as wages, consulting expenses, legal, regulatory and professional fees, and rent are recorded when the expense is incurred.

Cash and cash equivalents. We consider cash on hand, cash in banks, certificates of deposit, and other short-term securities with maturities of three months or less when purchased, as cash and cash equivalents.

Our bank accounts are deposited in insured institutions. The funds are insured up to $250,000. At December 31, 2011, our bank deposits did not exceed the insured amounts.

Reclassifications. Certain accounts and financial statement captions in the prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current period financial statements.

Inventory. Inventory consists of products designed to enhance table games, such as signs, layouts, bases for the different signs and electronic devices to support our enhanced bonus platforms. The inventory value is determined by the average cost method and management maintains inventory levels based on historical and industry trends. Signs and layouts do not change unless the table game changes. We do not allocate overhead to inventory as such costs are not significant.

Fair value of financial instruments. The fair value of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, miscellaneous receivable, prepaid expenses, inventory, accounts payable, accrued expenses and deferred revenue approximates the carrying amount of these financial instruments due to their short-term nature. The fair value of long-term debt, which approximates its carrying value, is based on current rates at which we could borrow funds with similar remaining maturities.

Property and equipment. Property and equipment are being depreciated over their estimated useful lives, 3 to 7 years, using the straight-line method of depreciation for book purposes.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets. The Company continually monitors events and changes in circumstances that could indicate carrying amounts of long-lived assets may not be recoverable. When such events or changes in circumstances are present, the Company assesses the recoverability of long-lived assets by determining whether the carrying value of such assets will be recovered through undiscounted expected future cash flows. If the total of the future cash flows is less than the carrying amount of those assets, the Company recognizes an impairment loss based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the assets. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or the fair value less costs to sell.

Intellectual Property and Intangible Assets. These intellectual property and intangible assets have finite lives and are being amortized using the straight-line method over their economic useful lives, five to thirty years. The intangible assets are analyzed for potential impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable.

Goodwill. The Company has classified as goodwill the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of assets acquired. On an annual basis, goodwill is tested for impairment and adjusted to reflect any impairment loss. No such loss was recorded for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Revenue recognition. Revenue is primarily derived from the licensing of products and intellectual property.  Consistent with our strategy, revenue is generated from negotiated and performance-based recurring licensing fees for table game content and related products. We also receive a one-time sale or reimbursement of manufactured equipment. When a table game is licensed without electronic enhancements, we generally sell the associated products and negotiate a month-to-month license fee for the game content.  When a table game is licensed with electronic enhancements, such as the Bonus Jackpot System, we generally sell the associated products, negotiate a month-to-month license fee for the game content and collect an additional recurring fee associated with the performance of the system such as a fee per each wager placed.

GALAXY GAMING, INC.

Notes to Financial Statements

December 31, 2011

NOTE 2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

Revenue recognition (continued). Substantially all revenue is recognized when it is earned. Clients may be invoiced monthly in advance for content fees and the advance billings are carried as deferred revenue on the balance sheet. Additionally, clients may be invoiced at the time of shipment or delivery of product sales and invoiced in arrears for performance-based items. Also, clients may be invoiced monthly or quarterly in arrears for content fees. The monthly recurring invoices are based on executed agreements with each client. Total revenue from recurring royalties for the licensing of game content, fees paid based upon the performance of our electronic platforms and Inter-Casino Jackpot system was $3,655,148 and $2,950,157 for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Revenue from reimbursement from the sale of product was $29,717 and $104,699 for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Revenue as reimbursement from the sale of our associated products is recognized when the following criteria are met:

The combination of hardware and software included in our Enhanced Table Systems and e-Tables are essential to the operation of the system. As such we do not segregate the portion of revenue between manufactured equipment and any software or electronic devices needed to use the equipment when the system is sold. We do not market the software separately from the equipment.

Costs of ancillary products and assembled components. Costs of ancillary products and assembled components include pay tables, layouts and signage as it relates to a specific proprietary game that our client may elect to purchase in connection with the use of our game and the cost of the assembled components of the Bonus Jackpot System.

Research and development. Research and development costs are charged to expense when incurred and are included in the statements of operations. These costs include salaries, benefits, and other internal costs allocated to software and hardware development efforts, as well as purchased components.

Deferred income taxes. Deferred income taxes are recognized by applying enacted statutory rates, applicable to future years, to temporary differences between the tax bases and financial statement carrying values of our asset and liabilities. Valuation allowances are recorded to reduce deferred tax assets to amounts that are more likely than not to be realized.

Basic income (loss) per share. Basic earnings per share excludes dilution and is computed by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock that then shared in the earnings of the entity.

Stock-based compensation. Stock-based compensation is accounted for at fair value in accordance with ASC Topic 718. During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Board approved the adoption of a stock option plan. As of December 31, 2011, we had not granted any stock options under this plan. Subsequently, on March 29, 2012, our Board approved an issuance of fully paid common stock to certain longstanding employees. See Note 18.

Management estimates. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Estimates and assumptions have been made in determining the depreciable lives of such assets and the allowance for doubtful accounts receivable. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Recently issued accounting guidance. We do not expect the adoption of recently issued accounting pronouncements to have a significant impact on our results of operations, financial position or cash flow.

GALAXY GAMING, INC.

Notes to Financial Statements

December 31, 2011

NOTE 3. NOTE RECEIVABLE – RELATED PARTY

The note receivable at December 31, 2011 and 2010 was as follows:

We acquired, with an asset purchase agreement from GGLLC, the note receivable stated above, as part of the purchase of the remaining intellectual property including patents, patent applications, trademarks, trademark applications, copyrights, know-how and trade secrets related to the casino gaming services including but not limited to games, side bets, inventions and ideas. The purchase was financed by a ten year unsecured note with a 6% fixed interest rate, monthly principal and interest payments of $6,598 with the unpaid principal and interest due in February 2017. Interest income associated with this note receivable was $24,821 and $26,150 for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The terms of the note were amended in September 2010 whereby the monthly principal and interest payment was reduced to $3,332 and the unpaid principal and interest is due August 2015.

Management evaluates collectability on a regular basis and will set up reserves for uncollectible amounts when it has determined that some or all of this receivable may be uncollectible. At December 31, 2011, management believed that 100% of the notes receivable principal and interest amounts are collectable.

NOTE 4. PREPAID EXPENSES

Prepaid expenses consist of the following as of December 31, 2011 and 2010:

NOTE 5. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

We owned property and equipment, recorded at cost, which consisted of the following at December 31, 2011 and 2010:

Depreciation expense was $22,412 and $12,833 for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

GALAXY GAMING, INC.

Notes to Financial Statements

December 31, 2011

NOTE 6. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Intellectual property and intangible assets consisted of the following at December 31, 2011 and 2010:

Amortization expense was $413,858 and $26,258 related to the above assets for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

We acquired intellectual property including patents, patent applications, trademarks, trademark applications, copyrights, know-how and trade secrets related to the casino gaming services, including but not limited to, games, side bets, inventions and ideas, valued at $140,967 from a related party.

We purchased back a regional territory from an outside sales representative. The total value of this agreement was $150,000 and the resulting intangible asset has an infinite life.

We executed an asset purchase agreement on April 15, 2010, with T&P Gaming, Inc., and its majority owners whereby we acquired the client installation base, intellectual property, territorial license and related inventory associated with the “Deuces Wild Hold’em Fold’em game (“Deuces Wild”) and related “Random Wild” game for $216,000.

On October 1, 2011, we entered into an asset purchase agreement with Prime Table Games, LLC. A subsequent valuation report performed by a national business valuation firm out of Dallas, TX, concluded the following valuation of the deal:

The intellectual property and intangible assets are analyzed for potential impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. The territorial license has an infinite life.

NOTE 7. ACCRUED EXPENSES AND TAXES

We recorded accrued expenses and taxes, which consisted of the following at December 31, 2011 and 2010:

F-10

GALAXY GAMING, INC.

Notes to Financial Statements

December 31, 2011

NOTE 8. LONG-TERM DEBT

Long - term debt consists of the following at December 31, 2011 and 2010:

The note payable is paid to a commercial bank in monthly installments of $9,159 including fixed interest of 7.3%, for ten years, through February 2017, at which time there is a balloon payment of $1,003,230. This liability was assumed with the asset purchase agreement from the GGLLC. The note payable financed the purchase of the intellectual property including patents, patent applications, trademarks, trademark applications, copyrights, know-how and trade secrets related to the casino gaming services including but not limited to games, side bets, inventions and ideas. The note agreement with the commercial bank remains in the name of GGLLC and we have no direct obligation to the commercial bank.

In connection with the asset purchase agreement associated with the T&P Gaming acquisition executed on April 15, 2010, we obtained seller financing in the amount of $126,000 payable over eighteen months at an interest rate of 6% per annum. Monthly principal and interest payments of $7,301 were required with the first payment paid upon closing. The promissory note was fully paid-off in the year ended December 31, 2011.

In October, 2011 we closed an asset acquisition of Prime Table Games (US and UK components). Included within the structure of the $23 million acquisition was a $22.2 million component consisting of two promissory notes: 1) a US note for $12.2 million, and 2) a £6.4 million ($10.0 million USD) note. The notes were recorded at fair value, net of a debt discount of $1,530,000.

Maturities of our long-term debt as of December 31, 2011 are as follows:

NOTE 9. NOTE PAYABLE – RELATED PARTY

We received working capital loans from GGLLC, a related party, in 2008 and 2007. The loans bore 9% interest and were due 90 days after demand. The loans were fully paid in 2011. The note balances were $0 and $103,943 at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Accrued interest owed on this loan was $0 and $25,973 for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

NOTE 10. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Operating lease obligation. We lease our offices from a related party that is connected with our CEO. We entered into a lease effective September 1, 2010 for a period of two years with a monthly rental payment of $10,359. Rent expense was $124,319 and $143,551 for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Rent to be paid under the lease agreement is summarized as follows:

F-11

GALAXY GAMING, INC.

Notes to Financial Statements

December 31, 2011

NOTE 10. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (continued)

Legal proceedings. Our current material litigation is briefly described below. We assume no obligation to update the status of pending litigation, except as required by applicable law, statute or regulation.

Sherron settlement – In 2008, Sherron Associates, Inc. (“Sherron”) filed a suit against us claiming they were the assignee of a judgment against our CEO and further claiming we were the alter-ego of our CEO and therefore responsible for payment of the judgment.  We denied all liability in the Sherron matter. In order to reduce the costs and uncertainties associated with litigation, the parties executed a settlement agreement on October 25, 2011. In connection with the settlement agreement we agreed to pay Sherron the sum of $150,000. Monthly installments in the amount of $7,500 per month commenced November 1, 2011, with scheduled increases in phases over the course of one year to a maximum of $17,500 per month. The obligation was memorialized by a promissory note, at zero percent interest. The note has default interest of 12% per annum, secured by a confession of judgment in the amount of $150,000, which can be filed by Sherron immediately upon a default in any payment. Our obligation is personally guaranteed by our CEO. We recorded a provision for litigation settlement of $150,000 during the quarter ended September 30, 2011.

Our CEO agreed to pay Sherron the sum of $350,000 by June 1, 2012. If he fails to make the payment by that date, he is obligated to pay Sherron the sum of $375,000 by November 1, 2012. If our CEO fails to make that payment on the specified due date, we have agreed to make the payment by November 15, 2012. In the event payment is not made by November 15, 2012, Sherron may file a confession of judgment for $375,000 against our CEO and us with interest accruing at the rate of 12% per annum from November 15, 2012. If our CEO fails to make the $350,000 payment to Sherron by June 1, 2012, then our CEO and we will meet by August 1, 2012, to discuss whether or not he has the means to pay Sherron $375,000 by November 1, 2012. If, after the August 1, 2012, meeting, our CEO and we agree that he does not have the means to pay the $375,000 by November 1, 2012, then he will assign 1.5 million or more of shares of our stock held by Triangulum Partners, LLC (depending on the trading price of our shares as of August 1, 2012) to us and such assignment shall provide us the power and authority to sell such shares on the open market in order to satisfy the $375,000 owed to Sherron. If we are unable to raise the full amount of $375,000 through the sales of shares by November 15, 2012, or we are unable to sell any shares by that date, then our CEO guarantees and owes either $375,000 or any remaining balance thereof to us.

California administrative licensing action – In March 2003, Galaxy Gaming of California, LLC (“GGCA”), then a subsidiary of GGLLC, submitted an application to the California Gambling Control Commission (the “Commission”) for a determination of suitability for licensure to do business with tribal gaming operations in California. At the time, our CEO was a member of GGCA and was required to be included in the application process. The Division of Gambling Control of the California Department of Justice (“Division”) processed the application and in 2005 made an initial recommendation to the Commission alleging GGCA was unsuitable. Claiming the information compiled by the Division was inaccurate and the process seriously flawed and biased, GGCA and our CEO, requested the Commission assign an administrative law judge (“ALJ”) to further adjudicate the process in December 2006. The Commission granted their request and required the Division to first submit a statement of issues (“SOI”) against GGCA, which was filed in October 2009.

In February 2009, we independently applied to the Commission for a finding of suitability. We also sought the abandonment of the GGCA application. Since the Division (subsequently renamed the “Bureau of Gambling Control”), named our CEO in the SOI, the Commission decided to not process our application until resolution of the administrative action relating to GGCA. It also did not act upon our request to abandon the GGCA application. During these proceedings, we are entitled to conduct business in California, provided that, we obtain the requisite authorization with each tribe in California either through obtainment of an appropriate license or an exempt status determination. Total revenues derived from California for the year ended December 31, 2011, was $177,402. Our ability to continue to conduct business in California could be contingent upon a successful resolution of the action against GGCA.  Accordingly, we decided to vigorously defend the administrative action, to seek the abandonment of the GGCA application and to seek an independent finding of suitability with the Commission.

The GGCA administrative action remains pending. Hearings before the ALJ concluded in January 2012, and closing briefs are expected to be filed by the third quarter of 2012. The ALJ will present her findings to the Commission, which will ultimately decide the matter, subject to judicial review. An adverse decision could prevent us from conducting business in California and also potentially pay reasonable costs of the investigation and prosecution of the case. Although the action is against our CEO and GGCA, it is unknown whether the Bureau will attempt to seek reimbursement against us or whether such reimbursement would be granted. An adverse finding of suitability could also influence other gaming regulatory agencies and negatively affect our ability to conduct business in those jurisdictions. We believe the allegations against GGCA and our CEO are baseless and entirely without merit and intend to continue to vigorously respond to this action.

GALAXY GAMING, INC.

Notes to Financial Statements

December 31, 2011

NOTE 10. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (continued)

Reel Games, Inc. – On November 10, 2011, we were served with a summons and complaint by Reel Games, Inc. in the United States District Court Southern District of Florida, alleging amongst other things, misappropriations of trade secrets, breach of confidence, fraud and intentional interference with contract. Reel Games, Inc. has claimed that the value of the information misappropriated alone is in excess of $1 million. The allegations stem from a mutual non-disclosure and non-circumvention agreement executed by the parties in May 2010, in connection with us evaluating the acquisition of certain assets of Reel Games, Inc. In December 2011, we filed a Motion for Dismissal, which remains pending. We believe that the claims are entirely without merit and intend to defend this matter vigorously.

Unax Gaming – On March 14, 2012, we filed a complaint for patent infringement against Unax Service, LLC, a Washington limited liability company and Xuming Shangguan a.k.a. Sean Shangguan d.b.a. Unax Gaming in the United States District Court, Western District of Washington. We claim that the defendants’ games known as “Double Action Blackjack” and “Squeezit Blackjack” infringe on several patents held by us. We seek a permanent injunction against the infringing games, actual and exemplary damages, court costs and attorney fees. We intend to vigorously pursue all remedies available to us in the matter.

Washington administrative notice – On March 19, 2012, we received a notice of administrative charges from the Washington State Gambling Commission as a result of routine audit conducted by them in 2010. The notice involves alleged untimely notifications, predominantly by predecessor companies. Since receiving the notice we have preliminary discussions with commission officials. As a result of these initial discussions, our management believes the administrative charges will be resolved expeditiously and likely have no material effect on our business operations in Washington.

In the ordinary course of conducting our business, we are, from time to time, involved in other litigation, administrative proceedings and regulatory government investigations including but not limited to those in which we are a plaintiff.

NOTE 11. ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS

We record an allowance for doubtful accounts based on periodic reviews of accounts receivable. As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, we had an allowance for doubtful accounts of $41,306 and $19,912, respectively.

NOTE 12. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)

We had 65,000,000 shares of $.001 par value common stock and 10,000,000 shares of $.001 par value preferred stock authorized as of December 31, 2011. On April 1, 2010, we sold a total of 1,428,572 shares of common stock and 714,286 warrants for total cash proceeds of $500,000. In 2011, we issued 533,333 shares and stock warrants of 266,667 generating cash proceeds of $200,000 that was used to fund ongoing operations. Additionally, as a part of the asset acquisition of Prime Table Games on October 1, 2011, a total of 2,000,000 shares of common stock valued at $480,000 were issued to the two owners of that organization. There were 37,508,091 common shares and -0- preferred shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2011.

NOTE 13. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

We lease our offices from a related party that is related to our CEO.

We paid legal fees directly to the law firm retained by our CEO.  The law firm was employed in 2009, 2010 and 2011 for the express purpose of defending the Sherron litigation.  We believed this strategy to vacate the underlying judgment was a faster, surer and less expensive method to defend the Sherron litigation, than other alternatives available to us.  Total fees from this law firm charged to expense were $61,887 and $42,632 for 2011 and 2010, respectively. We anticipate no further legal fees pertaining to the Sherron litigation as a result of the settlement. See Note 9.

We have a note receivable from a related party totaling $391,940 and $420,450 at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. See Note 3.

We received working capital loans from GGLLC, a related party, in 2008 and 2007. In 2011, the loans were fully paid. See Note 9.

GALAXY GAMING, INC.

Notes to Financial Statements

December 31, 2011

NOTE 14. INCOME TAXES

For the year ended December 31, 2011, we had a net loss, and therefore, do not have a tax liability for the year. We have a previous net operating loss carry-forward of $1,160,000. Any income will be netted against this loss carry-forward, with the remainder to be used through the year 2028 to offset future taxable income. The cumulative net operating loss carry-forward for income tax purposes may differ from the cumulative financial statement loss due to permanent differences and timing differences between book and tax reporting. Additionally, we have a foreign tax credit carry-forward of approximately $181,000 that can be used in the future to offset federal income tax owed.

We periodically review the need for a valuation allowance against deferred tax assets based upon earnings history and trends. We believe the valuation allowances provided are appropriate.

The cumulative tax effect at the expected rate of 34% of significant items comprising our net deferred tax amount is as follows:

NOTE 15. NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING CASH FLOW DISCLOSURES

We sold 101,250 shares of common stock to employees in exchange for various notes receivable totaling $40,500. As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, $3,916 and $10,520, respectively, was still outstanding and has been recorded as a stock subscription receivable.

During the year ended December 31, 2010, we issued 40,000 shares of common stock in settlement of accounts payable. We issued 450,000 shares of common stock in connection with an asset acquisition from T&P Gaming.

During the year ended December 31, 2011, we issued 2,000,000 shares of common stock as partial payment in connection with an asset acquisition from Prime Table Games.

NOTE 16. STOCK OPTIONS AND WARRANTS

As indicated in Note 15 we issued 714,286 warrants in connection with the sale of common stock on April 1, 2010. Additionally, we issued 266,667 warrants in connection with the sale of common stock during the quarter ended June 30, 2011. We have accounted for these warrants as equity instruments in accordance with EITF 00-19 (ASC 815-40), Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to, and Potentially Settled in, a Company’s Own Stock, and as such, will be classified in stockholders’ equity as they meet the definition of “…indexed to the issuer’s stock” in EITF 01-06 (ASC 815-40) The Meaning of Indexed to a Company’s Own Stock. We have estimated the fair value of the warrants issued in connection with the sale of common stock at $323,128 and the employment agreement at $10,665 using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.

During the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, we issued 22,500 stock options each year as part of the employment agreement with our CFO, who subsequently terminated his employment. See Note 18. Black-Scholes testing was performed on these options, but because the options were nullified as a result of his resignation, the results were reversed as of December 31, 2011.

During the year ended December 31, 2011, we issued 373,750 stock options to two Board members. The options were valued at the fair market value of the services performed, which resulted in an expense of $28,000 for the year ended December 31, 2011.

GALAXY GAMING, INC.

Notes to Financial Statements

December 31, 2011

NOTE 16. STOCK OPTIONS AND WARRANTS (continued)

Key assumptions used by us are summarized as follows:

The warrants issued have been accounted for as an equity transaction. The cost of the options issued in connection with the employment agreement and to the Board members were classified as operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2011.

A summary of changes in share purchase warrants during the year ended December 31, 2011 is as follows:

A summary of changes in employee stock options during the year ended December 31, 2011 is as follows:

NOTE 17. ASSET ACQUISITIONS AND SIGNIFICANT TRANSACTIONS

Acquisition of T&P Gaming’s assets. On April 15, 2010, we executed an asset purchase agreement with T&P Gaming, Inc. and its majority owners whereby we acquired the client installation base, intellectual property, territorial license and related inventory associated with the Deuces Wild Hold’em Fold’em and Random Wild games.

The purchase price was $216,000. Terms of the purchase included a down payment of $90,000, payable in the form of 450,000 shares of our common stock with the balance paid by a promissory note payable over eighteen months at an interest rate of 6% per annum. Monthly principal and interest payments of $7,301 were required. The promissory note was fully paid in the year ended December 31, 2011.

Acquisition of Prime Table Games’ assets. On October 4, 2011 we executed an asset purchase agreement (“Prime Agreement”) with Prime Table Games LLC and Prime Table Games UK (collectively “Prime Table Games”). Under the terms of the Prime Agreement we acquired over 20 different table games, including 21+3, Two-way Hold'em and Three Card Poker which are currently played on approximately 500 tables in 200 casinos in the United States, the United Kingdom and in the Caribbean. (Three Card Poker rights are limited to the British Isles.) The intellectual property portfolio includes 36 patents, 11 patents pending, 96 worldwide trademark and design registrations and 47 domain name registrations. The two principals of Prime Table Games also executed with us a non-compete agreement.

GALAXY GAMING, INC.

Notes to Financial Statements

December 31, 2011

NOTE 17. ASSET ACQUISITIONS AND SIGNIFICANT TRANSACTIONS (continued)

The acquisition was accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting. The allocation of fair value of the purchase price, based on an independent valuation, is as follows:

Terms of the purchase included a down payment of $480,000, payable in the form of 2,000,000 shares of our common stock with the balance due in the form of two promissory notes. One of the notes is payable to Prime Table Games LLC in the amount of $12,200,000 (USD) and the other is payable to Prime Table Games UK in the amount of £6,400,000 (GBP). At the closing of the acquisition, the parties agreed to a conversion rate of one United States Dollar is equal to 64/100 British Pound Sterling, ($1.00USD = £0.64GBP). Interest on the promissory notes was 0% in 2011. The fair value of the notes, net of the debt discount was $20,670,000. The rate increases to 3% in 2012 and increases at 1% per year thereafter to maximum of 9%. Payments on each of the notes are as follows:

Prime Table Games LLC. Monthly payments are due under this note, commencing with $100,000 due on or before January 28, 2012. Subsequent payments are due on the 28th day of each month and the payment amount shall increase to $130,000 per month beginning 16 months after the closing, $160,000 per month beginning in 28 months, $190,000 per month beginning in 40 months and $220,000 beginning in 52 months until fully paid.

Prime Table Games UK. Monthly payments are due under this note, commencing with £64,000 due on or before January 28, 2012. Subsequent payments are due on the 28th day of each month and the payment amount shall increase to £76,800 per month beginning 16 months after the closing, £89,600 per month beginning in 28 months, £102,400 per month beginning in 40 months, £115,200 per month in 52 months until fully paid.

In the event future monthly revenue received by us from the “Assets,” as defined in the Prime Agreement is less than 90% of the notes monthly payment due to Prime Table Games, then the note payments may, at our option, be adjusted to the higher of $100,000 per month (for the Prime Table Games LLC note) and £64,000 per month (for the Prime Table Games UK note) or 90% of the monthly revenue amount. If we engage in this payment adjustment election, the note shall not be deemed in default and the interest rate of the note will increase 2% per annum for the duration of the note or until the standard payment schedule resumes.

The notes are collateralized by the all of the assets acquired from Prime Table Games LLC and Prime Table Games UK.

Acquisition of Lakes Entertainment’s assets. On November 1, 2011, we entered into an asset purchase agreement (the “Lakes Agreement”) with Lakes Entertainment, Inc., a Minnesota corporation (“Lakes”). Under the Lakes Agreement, we acquired certain business assets of Lakes. The acquisition includes a portfolio of patented casino table games, including Bonus Craps, Four The Money, Rainbow Poker, and Roulette Craps, together with an assignment of the Lakes’ rights under existing licensing agreements with various casinos throughout the United States. The assignment of some of the contractual rights included in the acquisition will require the consent of the licensee and may be subject to customary regulatory approvals.

The purchase price was $1 plus additional revenue sharing payments (“Contingent Consideration”), which we are obligated to pay. The Contingent Consideration is based upon differing percentages of the gross revenues generated by the acquired assets following the acquisition. Under the Lakes Agreement, Lakes has retained a perpetual, royalty-free license to install and offer for play any of the assigned casino games in any casino owned or managed by Lakes. The Lakes Agreement allows us the option at any time to buy-out Lakes’ right to the Contingent Consideration. In the event an agreed amount of Contingent Consideration has been not received within 18 months after the closing of the Lakes Agreement, Lakes will have the option to re-acquire all assets assigned under the Lakes Agreement and to collect all revenue generated by such assets going forward. In connection with the Lakes Agreement, Lakes has executed a non-competition agreement restricting Lakes participation in any business whose products are substantially similar to the casino games acquired by us under the Lakes Agreement for a period of two years.

GALAXY GAMING, INC.

Notes to Financial Statements

December 31, 2011

NOTE 17. ASSET ACQUISITIONS AND SIGNIFICANT TRANSACTIONS (continued)

TableMAX agreement. On February 21, 2011, we entered into a definitive agreement (“TMAX Agreement”) with TableMAX Corporation (“TMAX”) a provider of electronic table games and platforms headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada and a principal investor in TMAX.  Under the terms of the TMAX Agreement, we have exclusive worldwide rights (excluding one international territory and two U.S. states) to the TMAX electronic gaming platform and certain games titles.  We created an operating division (the “TableMAX Division”) which conducts sales, distribution, marketing, engineering, sub-licensing and manufacturing related to the TMAX products and related intellectual property.  The TableMAX Division is wholly owned by us and is not considered owned by, related to, a joint venture partner of or an agent of TMAX in any manner.  The term of the TMAX Agreement is five years.  At any time during the term of the TMAX Agreement, either TMAX or we may make a written offer to purchase the sole ownership of the TableMAX Division.  Such offer shall be subject to the parties’ mutual agreement and neither party shall be under any obligation to accept such an offer.  If such an agreement has not been consummated within six months of the expiration of the TMAX Agreement, then each party must indicate to the other party no later than six months from the scheduled expiration of the TMAX Agreement, their intent to renew the TMAX Agreement for a term of at least one year, or terminate.

TMAX agreed to assign, for the term of the TMAX Agreement, all of its existing gaming installations and usable inventory to the TableMAX Division.  We agreed to furnish our intellectual property relating to our table game content for use by the TableMAX Division, royalty-free for the term of the TMAX Agreement.  The TMAX Agreement specifies annual performance targets whereby we are required, on a cumulative basis, to have minimum table placements.  If we fail to meet the performance criteria as defined in the TMAX Agreement, we will be required to pay TMAX the difference between TMAX’s share of the actual profit obtained by the TableMAX Division and the estimated profit that would have been obtained if the minimum performance criteria had been obtained.

We are responsible for the losses of the TableMAX Division however; TMAX has agreed to reimburse us during the first 12 months from the date of the TMAX Agreement for operating expenses of the TableMAX Division up to a maximum of $600,000.  Net profits from the TableMAX Division will be split between TMAX and us on a sliding scale basis dependent upon the number of TableMAX Division table installations and profit results as defined in the TMAX Agreement.

NOTE 18. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Zimmerman resignation. Mr. Andrew Zimmerman, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer, resign his positions to pursue other business interests. His resignation was effective February 1, 2012. Our Board appointed Mr. Robert Saucier to assume all three roles on an interim basis. We are actively engaged in a search to permanently fill these positions. There were no known disagreements with Mr. Zimmerman regarding our operations, policies or practices.

Unax Gaming litigation. On March 14, 2012, we filed a lawsuit against Unax Service, et al. See Note 9.

Employee stock grant program. On March 29, 2012, our Board approved an employee stock grant program for selected long term employees. Under this plan, twelve employees were granted shares of common stock. For purposes of this transaction, we expensed the shares at $0.10 each, which was an approximately 29% reduction of the closing bid on the date of the grant. The granted a total of 802,500 shares, which were fully vested at the time of issuance and will be expensed in the amount of $80,250 plus payroll related and other transaction expenses. The shares are restricted and may not be transferred for a minimum of six months. All tax liabilities related to the stock grants are the responsibility of each individual employee.

Washington administrative notice. On March 19, 2012, we received a notice of administrative charges from the Washington State Gambling Commission. See Note 9.

Scott resignation. Mr. Daniel Scott, director, resign from our Board on April 13, 2012.

In accordance with ASC 855-10, the Company has analyzed its operations subsequent to December 31, 2011 to the date these financial statements were issued, and has determined that it does not have any material subsequent events to disclose in these financial statements other than the events discussed above. 

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

No events occurred requiring disclosure under Item 307 and 308 of Regulation S-K during the fiscal year ending December 31, 2011.

ITEM 9A(T). CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in company reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in company reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including our CEO and Treasurer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

As required by Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 under the Exchange Act, our CEO and CFO carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2011. Based on their evaluation, they concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our CEO and CFO and effected by our Board, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting and the preparation of our financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Internal control over financial reporting includes policies and procedures that pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets; provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of our financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with the authorization of our Board and management; and provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements.

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our CEO, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”).  Based on this evaluation under the criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2011.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting.  Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit us to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

During the most recently completed fiscal quarter, there has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

None

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Directors and executive officers. The following information sets forth the names of our current directors and executive officers and their ages.

Set forth below is a brief description of the background and business experience of each of our current executive officers and directors.

Robert B. Saucier is our President, CEO, and Chairman of the Board.  In addition, with the departure of Mr. Zimmerman on February 1, 2012, Mr. Saucier has since served as our Interim CFO, Interim Secretary and Interim Treasurer. Mr. Saucier is our founder and has served as our President and CEO since inception and for our accounting and operational predecessors since 1997.  Besides leading the executive team, Mr. Saucier’s primary responsibilities include product development, strategic planning, developing acquisition strategies and investor relations.  During his career, Mr. Saucier has founded and grown five start-up companies.  He was founder and CEO of the Mars Hotel Corporation, (1992 - 1998) a company that developed and managed the first non-tribal casino in Washington.  Previously, Mr. Saucier founded International Pacific, an Inc. 500 company which recorded a 2,447% rate (five year period) and served as its President and Chairman (1986 -1992).  He also founded and led Titan International, Inc. (1981 - 1986), a company that was engaged in electronic safety, security and surveillance systems.  Throughout his career, Mr. Saucier has consulted with and invested in numerous business ventures and real estate development projects.

William O’Hara is our Chief Operating Officer and a director and is in charge of the day-to-day operations of our business.  After a successful 21-year career in the cosmetic, cosmetology and aesthetic industry, Mr. O’Hara began his gaming industry career as the first employee of Shuffle Master Gaming in 1991.  Mr. O’Hara relocated to Las Vegas in 1992 to head up that company’s sales, service and marketing.  In 1998, he joined Casinovations, Inc. as Senior Vice President of operations and president of its Mississippi subsidiary.  In 2000, Mr. O’Hara joined PDS Gaming as the Senior Vice President of their newly formed electronic table games division. Mr. O’Hara joined Galaxy Gaming in February 2008.  Mr O’Hara previously served on the Board of Directors of the Missouri Riverboat Gaming Association and Casino Management Association.

Richard Baldwin is a director. Mr. Baldwin has over 17 years of corporate finance, capital markets and general management experience. He currently serves as President and Chief Financial Officer at TableMAX Gaming, Inc., a start-up company that develops proprietary technology for the global casino gaming industry and currently our strategic partner. Previously, he held several executive level positions, including Chief Financial Officer positions at Tropicana Entertainment, Shuffle Master Gaming (NASDAQ Global Select Market: “SHFL”), and as Director of Corporate Finance & Investor Relations at International Game Technology (NYSE: “IGT”). Mr. Baldwin started his career in public accounting with Deloitte & Touche LLP, is a graduate of the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, and is a Nevada registered CPA.

Our bylaws authorize no less than one and no more than fifteen directors.  We currently have three directors.

Term of office. Our directors are appointed for a one-year term to hold office until the next annual meeting of our shareholders or until removed from office in accordance with our bylaws.  Our officers are appointed by our Board and hold office until removed by the Board.

Family relationships. There are no family relationships between or among the directors, executive officers or persons nominated or chosen by us to become directors or executive officers.

Director or officer involvement in certain legal proceedings. To the best of our knowledge, except as described below, during the past five years, none of the following occurred with respect to a present or former director or executive officer of the Company: (1) any bankruptcy petition filed by or against any business of which such person was a general partner or executive officer either at the time of the bankruptcy or within two years prior to that time; (2) any conviction in a criminal proceeding or being subject to a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses); (3) being subject to any order, judgment or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of any competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting his involvement in any type of business, securities or banking activities; and (4) being found by a court of competent jurisdiction (in a civil action), the Securities and Exchange Commission or the Commodities Futures Trading Commission to have violated a federal or state securities or commodities law, and the judgment has not been reversed, suspended or vacated.

None.

Committees of the Board. Mr. Scott formerly served on our compensation committee and has not been replaced.  We do not currently have an executive committee or stock plan committee.

Audit committee. We do not have a separately-designated standing audit committee.  The entire Board performs the functions of an audit committee, but no written charter governs the actions of the Board when performing the functions of what would generally be performed by an audit committee.  The Board approves the selection of our independent accountants and meets and interacts with the independent accountants to discuss issues related to financial reporting. In addition, the Board reviews the scope and results of the audit with the independent accountants, reviews with management and the independent accountants our annual operating results, considers the adequacy of our internal accounting procedures and considers other auditing and accounting matters including fees to be paid to the independent auditor and the performance of the independent auditor.

Nominating committee. Our Board does not maintain a nominating committee. As a result, no written charter governs the director nomination process.  The size of our Board, at this time, does not require a separate nominating committee.

When evaluating director nominees, our directors consider the following factors:

Our goal is to assemble a Board that brings together a variety of perspectives and skills derived from high quality business and professional experience.  In doing so, the Board will also consider candidates with appropriate non-business backgrounds. Other than the foregoing, there are no stated minimum criteria for director nominees, although the Board may also consider such other factors as it may deem are in our best interests as well as our stockholders.  In addition, the Board identifies nominees by first evaluating the current members of the Board willing to continue in service.  Current members of the Board with skills and experience that are relevant to our business and who are willing to continue in service are considered for re-nomination.  If any member of the Board does not wish to continue in service or if the Board decides not to re-nominate a member for re-election, the Board then identifies the desired skills and experience of a new nominee in light of the criteria above.  Current members of the Board are polled for suggestions as to individuals meeting the criteria described above.  The Board may also engage in research to identify qualified individuals.  To date, we have not engaged third parties to identify or evaluate or assist in identifying potential nominees, although we reserve the right in the future to retain a third party search firm, if necessary.  The Board does not typically consider shareholder nominees because it believes that our current nomination process is sufficient to identify directors who serve our best interests.

Section 16(a) beneficial ownership reporting compliance. Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors and executive officers and persons who beneficially own more than ten percent of a registered class of our equity securities to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of common stock and other equity securities.  Officers, directors and greater than ten percent beneficial shareholders are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.  To the best of our knowledge based solely on a review of Forms 3, 4, and 5 (and any amendments thereof) received by us during or with respect to the year ended December 31, 2011, the following persons have failed to file, on a timely basis, the identified reports required by Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act during fiscal year ended December 2011:

Code of Ethics. As of December 31, 2011, we had not adopted a Code of Ethics for Financial Executives, which would include our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation discussion and analysis. Our current executive compensation system consists of cash compensation to the executive officers, who are primarily responsible for the day-to-day management and continuing development of our business.

We presently do not have an employment agreement or any fixed policy regarding compensation of Robert Saucier, our CEO.  Currently, Mr. Saucier receives cash compensation of approximately $120,000 per year, which was raised to that level as of January 1, 2012. See Note 19.  As our founder, Mr. Saucier holds a strong entrepreneurial interest in developing and expanding our business to the best of his ability.

Our CFO, Andrew Zimmerman was party to a three-year employment agreement with us that terminated on February 1, 2012.  Mr. Zimmerman’s compensation arrangement consisted of a base annual salary.

Our COO, William O’Hara, is party to a three-year employment agreement with us. The initial three-year term expired in February 2011, however Mr. O’Hara continues to be represented by the agreement.  Mr. O’Hara’s compensation arrangement consists of a base annual salary together with a potential monthly bonus to be awarded for those months in which we achieve higher sales figures than in any previous month.  The objective of this arrangement is to provide Mr. O’Hara with regular compensation that is reasonable in light of the cash constraints faced by our developing business while also providing an incentive for the COO to lead the operations towards a continually expanding revenue base. Additionally, Mr. O’Hara was the recipient of a stock grant of 225,000 shares at a strike price of 10 cents per share on March 29, 2012. See “Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholders Matters” for more complete information included in this Form 10-K.

Summary compensation table. The table below summarizes all compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to our current executive officers for each of the last two completed fiscal years.

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE 

Narrative disclosure to the summary compensation table. We do not have a written employment contract with our CEO, Robert Saucier.  His compensation increased to $120,000 annually as of January 1, 2012.  Our COO, William O’Hara is party to a three-year employment agreement with us.  Mr. O’Hara receives a base annual salary of $150,000.  In addition, for each month in which our total sales are higher than any previous month, Mr. O’Hara earns a bonus equal to 10% of the increased sales above the prior monthly record.  Mr. O’Hara’s contract expired in February 2011, however, Mr. O’Hara will receive six months of severance pay including benefits if his termination is other than for cause. Our CFO, Secretary, and Treasurer, Andrew Zimmerman was also party to a three-year employment agreement with us through November 2012. Mr. Zimmerman’s base compensation consists of a monthly salary paid in bi-monthly installments.  Under his employment agreement with us, Mr. Zimmerman’s base salary began at $6,600 and increased in phases over the course of his first year of employment to a maximum of $12,500 per month. Mr. Zimmerman’s employment with us ended effective February 1, 2012.

Messrs. Saucier, Zimmerman and O’Hara each agreed to temporarily reduce their salaries by 10% effective April 1, 2010. We restored one half of the reduction effective September 15, 2010, and the remaining amount effective with the pay period ending March 15, 2011.

(A) The dollar amounts of Option awards are the aggregate grant date fair value of the option awards. Please refer to Note 16 for further information about our calculation of those amounts, which we based on the reported closing market price of our common stock on the OTCBB on the date we granted the options.

Outstanding equity awards at fiscal year-end table. The table below summarizes all unexercised options, stock that has not vested, and equity incentive plan awards for each named executive officer outstanding as of the end of our last completed fiscal year.

Compensation of directors table. The table below summarizes all compensation paid to our directors for our last completed fiscal year.

Narrative disclosure to the director compensation table. Robert Saucier and William O’Hara do not currently receive any cash compensation from us or for their service as members of the Board.  The compensation summarized above reflects the compensation each of our directors and former directors received in their capacities as our executive officers.  Dan Scott and Richard Baldwin each receive a cash stipend in the amount of $4,000 per quarter.  We have also agreed that Mr. Scott and Mr. Baldwin will receive immediately-vested options to purchase 46,250 shares of our common stock per quarter.

Stock option grants. In anticipation of establishing an equity compensation plan we granted options to our CFO to purchase 37,500 shares of our common stock at a price of $0.55 per share, exercisable for three years.  Additional grants of options to purchase 22,500 shares of our common stock at a price of $0.55 per share, exercisable for three years, will be made at the beginning of each additional year of service. We also agreed that our outside Board members, Dan Scott and Richard Baldwin, would receive immediately-vested options to purchase 46,250 shares of our common stock per quarter.  The exercise price and term of such stock options has not been determined at this time.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The following table sets forth, as of March 29, 2011, the beneficial ownership of our common stock by each executive officer and director, by each person known by us to beneficially own more than 5% of the our common stock and by the executive officers and directors as a group.  Except as otherwise indicated, all shares are owned directly and the percentage shown is based on 38,310,591 shares of common stock issued and outstanding on March 29, 2011:

(1) As used in this table, "beneficial ownership" means the sole or shared power to vote, or to direct the voting of, a security, or the sole or shared investment power with respect to a security (i.e., the power to dispose of, or to direct the disposition of, a security). In addition, for purposes of this table, a person is deemed, as of any date, to have "beneficial ownership" of any security that such person has the right to acquire within 60 days after such date.

(2) Mr. Robert Saucier is the Manager of Triangulum Partners, LLC.  In that capacity, he is able to direct voting and investment decisions regarding the entity’s shares of common stock.

(3) Of Mr. O’Hara’s 265,000 shares of our stock, 225,000 was granted as part of an Employee Stock Grant program on March 29, 2012. See “Item 11. Executive Compensation” and See Note 19 in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary data” included in this Form 10-K.

(4) Mr. Baldwin has options that are currently vested in the amount of 138,750.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Except as set forth below, none of our directors or executive officers, nor any proposed nominee for election as a director, nor any person who beneficially owns, directly or indirectly, shares carrying more than 5% of the voting rights attached to all of our outstanding shares, nor any members of the immediate family (including spouse, parents, children, siblings, and in-laws) of any of the foregoing persons has any material interest, direct or indirect, in any transaction over the last two years or in any presently proposed transaction which, in either case, has or will materially affect us:

We are not a “listed issuer” within the meaning of Item 407 of Regulation S-K and there are no applicable listing standards for determining the independence of our directors.  Applying the definition of independence set forth in Rule 4200(a)(15) of The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc., we believe that Mr. Richard Baldwin is our sole independent director.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

Below is the table of Audit Fees billed by our auditor in connection with the audit of our annual financial statements for the years ended:

PART IV

Item 15.   Exhibits, Financial Statements Schedules

The following financial statements and schedules listed below are included in this Form 10-K.

Financial Statements (See Item 8)

⁽¹⁾Incorporated by reference to the Form 8K, filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 24, 2011.

⁽²⁾Incorporated by reference to the Form 8K, filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 11, 2011.

⁽³⁾ Incorporated by reference to the Form 8K, filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 13, 2009.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.