UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
_____________________________________
FORM 10-Q
_____________________________________
(Mark One)
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended January 1, 2012
OR
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from __________ to __________
Commission file number 1-1370
________________________________________
BRIGGS & STRATTON CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
_____________________________________
Wisconsin | 39-0182330 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
12301 West Wirth Street, Wauwatosa, Wisconsin 53222
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)
414/259-5333
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
____________________________________________
Yes x No o | Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. | |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer | x | Accelerated filer | ¨ |
Non-accelerated filer | o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company | ¨ |
Yes o No x | Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). | |
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Class | Outstanding at February 3, 2012 | |
COMMON STOCK, par value $0.01 per share | 49,773,850 Shares | |
BRIGGS & STRATTON CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX
Page No. | ||
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION | ||
Item 1. | ||
Item 2. | ||
Item 3. | ||
Item 4. | ||
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION | ||
Item 1. | ||
Item 1A. | ||
Item 2. | ||
Item 6. | ||
2
BRIGGS & STRATTON CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
ASSETS
January 1, 2012 | July 3, 2011 | |||||||
CURRENT ASSETS: | ||||||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents | $ | 13,932 | $ | 209,639 | ||||
Accounts Receivable, Net | 291,587 | 249,358 | ||||||
Inventories - | ||||||||
Finished Products and Parts | 415,911 | 292,527 | ||||||
Work in Process | 142,758 | 127,358 | ||||||
Raw Materials | 8,883 | 7,206 | ||||||
Total Inventories | 567,552 | 427,091 | ||||||
Deferred Income Tax Asset | 43,110 | 42,163 | ||||||
Assets Held for Sale | 4,000 | 4,000 | ||||||
Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets | 38,324 | 36,413 | ||||||
Total Current Assets | 958,505 | 968,664 | ||||||
OTHER ASSETS: | ||||||||
Goodwill | 205,037 | 202,940 | ||||||
Investments | 20,494 | 21,017 | ||||||
Debt Issuance Costs, Net | 6,236 | 4,919 | ||||||
Other Intangible Assets, Net | 88,068 | 89,275 | ||||||
Long-Term Deferred Income Tax Asset | 21,548 | 31,001 | ||||||
Other Long-Term Assets, Net | 9,282 | 9,102 | ||||||
Total Other Assets | 350,665 | 358,254 | ||||||
PLANT AND EQUIPMENT: | ||||||||
Cost | 1,033,160 | 1,026,967 | ||||||
Less - Accumulated Depreciation | 705,239 | 687,667 | ||||||
Total Plant and Equipment, Net | 327,921 | 339,300 | ||||||
TOTAL ASSETS | $ | 1,637,091 | $ | 1,666,218 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
3
BRIGGS & STRATTON CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS (Continued)
(In thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
LIABILITIES & SHAREHOLDERS’ INVESTMENT
January 1, 2012 | July 3, 2011 | |||||||
CURRENT LIABILITIES: | ||||||||
Accounts Payable | $ | 185,555 | $ | 183,733 | ||||
Short-Term Debt | 3,000 | 3,000 | ||||||
Accrued Liabilities | 149,333 | 157,650 | ||||||
Total Current Liabilities | 337,888 | 344,383 | ||||||
OTHER LIABILITIES: | ||||||||
Accrued Pension Cost | 181,588 | 191,417 | ||||||
Accrued Employee Benefits | 24,252 | 24,100 | ||||||
Accrued Postretirement Health Care Obligation | 110,577 | 116,092 | ||||||
Other Long-Term Liabilities | 30,553 | 27,283 | ||||||
Long-Term Debt | 240,000 | 225,000 | ||||||
Total Other Liabilities | 586,970 | 583,892 | ||||||
SHAREHOLDERS’ INVESTMENT: | ||||||||
Common Stock - Authorized 120,000 shares, $.01 par value, issued 57,854 shares | 579 | 579 | ||||||
Additional Paid-In Capital | 80,083 | 79,354 | ||||||
Retained Earnings | 1,079,252 | 1,092,864 | ||||||
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss | (247,729 | ) | (243,498 | ) | ||||
Treasury Stock at cost, 8,068 and 7,373 shares, respectively | (199,952 | ) | (191,356 | ) | ||||
Total Shareholders’ Investment | 712,233 | 737,943 | ||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ INVESTMENT | $ | 1,637,091 | $ | 1,666,218 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
4
BRIGGS & STRATTON CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
January 1, 2012 | December 26, 2010 | January 1, 2012 | December 26, 2010 | |||||||||||||
NET SALES | $ | 447,947 | $ | 450,324 | $ | 845,244 | $ | 784,440 | ||||||||
COST OF GOODS SOLD | 374,067 | 372,003 | 705,310 | 644,125 | ||||||||||||
Gross Profit | 73,880 | 78,321 | 139,934 | 140,315 | ||||||||||||
ENGINEERING, SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES | 73,292 | 74,559 | 140,969 | 145,015 | ||||||||||||
Income (Loss) from Operations | 588 | 3,762 | (1,035 | ) | (4,700 | ) | ||||||||||
INTEREST EXPENSE | (4,796 | ) | (9,008 | ) | (9,134 | ) | (14,165 | ) | ||||||||
OTHER INCOME, Net | 1,388 | 1,637 | 3,183 | 3,073 | ||||||||||||
Loss Before Income Taxes | (2,820 | ) | (3,609 | ) | (6,986 | ) | (15,792 | ) | ||||||||
PROVISION (CREDIT) FOR INCOME TAXES | (5,517 | ) | (2,357 | ) | (4,463 | ) | (6,427 | ) | ||||||||
NET INCOME (LOSS) | $ | 2,697 | $ | (1,252 | ) | $ | (2,523 | ) | $ | (9,365 | ) | |||||
EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE DATA | ||||||||||||||||
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding | 49,418 | 49,702 | 49,746 | 49,666 | ||||||||||||
Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Share | $ | 0.05 | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (0.05 | ) | $ | (0.19 | ) | |||||
Diluted Average Shares Outstanding | 50,326 | 49,702 | 49,746 | 49,666 | ||||||||||||
Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share | $ | 0.05 | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (0.05 | ) | $ | (0.19 | ) | |||||
DIVIDENDS PER SHARE | $ | 0.11 | $ | 0.11 | $ | 0.22 | $ | 0.22 | ||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
5
BRIGGS & STRATTON CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
January 1, 2012 | December 26, 2010 | |||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||
Net Loss | $ | (2,523 | ) | $ | (9,365 | ) | ||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: | ||||||||
Depreciation and Amortization | 31,577 | 31,080 | ||||||
Stock Compensation Expense | 3,555 | 8,003 | ||||||
Loss on Disposition of Plant and Equipment | 16 | 690 | ||||||
Provision (Benefit) for Deferred Income Taxes | 5,287 | (3,909 | ) | |||||
Earnings of Unconsolidated Affiliates | (2,337 | ) | (2,331 | ) | ||||
Dividends Received from Unconsolidated Affiliates | 4,029 | 6,880 | ||||||
Change in Operating Assets and Liabilities: | ||||||||
(Increase) Decrease in Accounts Receivable | (43,411 | ) | 42,214 | |||||
Increase in Inventories | (140,214 | ) | (154,005 | ) | ||||
(Increase) Decrease in Other Current Assets | (841 | ) | 11,897 | |||||
Decrease in Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities | (8,020 | ) | (54,860 | ) | ||||
Other, Net | (12,118 | ) | (4,944 | ) | ||||
Net Cash Used in Operating Activities | (165,000 | ) | (128,650 | ) | ||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||
Additions to Plant and Equipment | (19,704 | ) | (21,341 | ) | ||||
Proceeds Received on Disposition of Plant and Equipment | 95 | 52 | ||||||
Payments for Acquisitions, Net of Cash Acquired | (2,673 | ) | — | |||||
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities | (22,282 | ) | (21,289 | ) | ||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||
Net Borrowings on Revolver | 15,000 | 55,000 | ||||||
Proceeds from Long-Term Debt Financing | — | 225,000 | ||||||
Debt Issuance Costs | (2,007 | ) | (4,994 | ) | ||||
Repayments on Long-Term Debt | — | (203,698 | ) | |||||
Treasury Stock Purchases | (11,384 | ) | — | |||||
Cash Dividends Paid | (5,565 | ) | (5,537 | ) | ||||
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities | (3,956 | ) | 65,771 | |||||
EFFECT OF FOREIGN CURRENCY EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | (4,469 | ) | (905 | ) | ||||
NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | (195,707 | ) | (85,073 | ) | ||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, Beginning | 209,639 | 116,554 | ||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, Ending | $ | 13,932 | $ | 31,481 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
6
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
1. General Information
The accompanying unaudited consolidated condensed financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and therefore do not include all information and footnotes necessary for a fair statement of financial position, results of operations and cash flows in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The year-end condensed balance sheet data was derived from audited financial statements, but also does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. However, in the opinion of Briggs & Stratton Corporation (the Company), adequate disclosures have been presented to prevent the information from being misleading, and all adjustments necessary to present fair statements of the results of operations and financial position have been included. All of these adjustments are of a normal recurring nature.
Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year. The information included in these consolidated condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes thereto which were included in our latest Annual Report on Form 10-K.
2. New Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2011-08, “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350), Testing Goodwill for Impairment,” which permits an entity to make a qualitative assessment of whether it is more likely than not that a reporting unit's fair value is less than its carrying value before applying the two-step goodwill impairment model that is currently in place. If it is determined through the qualitative assessment that a reporting unit's fair value is more likely than not greater than its carrying value, the remaining impairment steps would be unnecessary. The qualitative assessment is optional, allowing companies to go directly to the quantitative assessment. This update is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011 with early adoption permitted. Management does not expect adoption of this ASU to have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations, financial position or cash flow.
In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, “Comprehensive Income: Presentation of Comprehensive Income,” which amends current comprehensive income guidance. This ASU eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of shareholders’ equity. Instead, it requires entities to report components of comprehensive income in either (1) a continuous statement of comprehensive income or (2) two separate but consecutive statements. Under the two-statement approach, the first statement would include components of net income, which is consistent with the income statement format used today, and the second statement would include components of other comprehensive income (“OCI”). The ASU does not change the items that must be reported in OCI. ASU 2011-05 will be effective for public companies for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011 with early adoption permitted. Management does not expect adoption of this ASU to have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations, financial position or cash flow.
In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04 “Fair Value Measurement: Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRS.” The ASU is the result of joint efforts by the FASB and the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”) to develop a single, converged fair value framework. While the ASU is largely consistent with existing fair value measurement principles in U.S. GAAP, it expands existing disclosure requirements for fair value measurements and makes other amendments. Key additional disclosures include quantitative disclosures about unobservable inputs in Level 3 measures, qualitative information about sensitivity of Level 3 measures and valuation process, and classification within the fair value hierarchy for instruments where fair value is only disclosed in the footnotes but carrying amount is on some other basis. For public companies, the ASU is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. Management does not expect adoption of this ASU to have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations, financial position or cash flow.
3. Assets Held for Sale
On July 1, 2009 the Company announced a plan to close its Jefferson and Watertown, WI manufacturing facilities in fiscal 2010. At January 1, 2012 and at July 3, 2011, the Company had $4.0 million included in Assets Held for Sale in its Consolidated Balance Sheets consisting of certain assets related to the Jefferson, WI production facility. Prior to the closure, the facility manufactured all portable generator and pressure washer products marketed and sold by the Company within its Power Products Segment.
7
4. Earnings (Loss) Per Share
The Company computes earnings (loss) per share using the two-class method, an earnings allocation formula that determines earnings (loss) per share for each class of common stock and participating security according to dividends declared and participation rights in undistributed earnings. The Company’s unvested grants of restricted stock and deferred stock awards contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends (whether paid or unpaid), which are required to be treated as participating securities and included in the computation of basic earnings (loss) per share.
Information on earnings (loss) per share is as follows (in thousands except per share data):
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
January 1, 2012 | December 26, 2010 | January 1, 2012 | December 26, 2010 | ||||||||||||||
Net Income (Loss) | $ | 2,697 | $ | (1,252 | ) | $ | (2,523 | ) | $ | (9,365 | ) | ||||||
Less: Dividends Attributable to Unvested Shares | (80 | ) | (112 | ) | (207 | ) | (182 | ) | |||||||||
Net Income (Loss) Available to Common Shareholders | $ | 2,617 | $ | (1,364 | ) | $ | (2,730 | ) | $ | (9,547 | ) | ||||||
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding | 49,418 | 49,702 | 49,746 | 49,666 | |||||||||||||
Diluted Average Shares Outstanding | 50,326 | 49,702 | 49,746 | 49,666 | |||||||||||||
Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Share | $ | 0.05 | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (0.05 | ) | $ | (0.19 | ) | ||||||
Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share | $ | 0.05 | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (0.05 | ) | $ | (0.19 | ) | ||||||
The dilutive effect of the potential exercise of outstanding stock-based awards to acquire common shares is calculated using the treasury stock method. As a result of the Company incurring losses from continuing operations for the three months ended December 26, 2010 and for the six months ended January 1, 2012 and December 26, 2010, potential incremental common shares of 385,000, 887,000 and 362,000, respectively, were excluded from the calculation of diluted EPS for each period because the effect would have been anti-dilutive. In addition, the following options to purchase shares of common stock were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share as the exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the common shares:
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
January 1, 2012 | December 26, 2010 | January 1, 2012 | December 26, 2010 | |||||||||||||
Options to Purchase Shares of Common Stock (in thousands) | 4,712 | 4,262 | 4,041 | 4,262 | ||||||||||||
Weighted Average Exercise Price of Options Excluded | $ | 24.91 | $ | 28.08 | $ | 26.59 | 28.08 | |||||||||
On August 10, 2011, the Board of Directors of the Company authorized up to $50 million in funds for use in a common share repurchase program with an expiration of June 30, 2013. The common share repurchase program authorizes the purchase of shares of the Company's common stock on the open market or in private transactions from time to time, depending on market conditions and certain governing loan covenants. During fiscal 2012, the Company repurchased 801,843 shares on the open market at an average price $14.20 per share. There were no shares repurchased in fiscal 2011.
5. Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Comprehensive income (loss) is a more inclusive financial reporting method that includes certain financial information that has not been recognized in the calculation of net income (loss). Comprehensive income (loss) is defined as net income (loss) and other changes in shareholders’ investment from transactions and events other than with shareholders. Total comprehensive income (loss) is as follows (in thousands):
8
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
January 1, 2012 | December 26, 2010 | January 1, 2012 | December 26, 2010 | |||||||||||||
Net Income (Loss) | $ | 2,697 | $ | (1,252 | ) | $ | (2,523 | ) | $ | (9,365 | ) | |||||
Cumulative Translation Adjustments | 728 | 1,283 | (9,286 | ) | 10,508 | |||||||||||
Unrealized Loss on Derivative Instruments, Net of Tax | (3,092 | ) | (1,474 | ) | (3,102 | ) | (8,312 | ) | ||||||||
Unrecognized Pension & Postretirement Obligation, Net of Tax | 4,081 | 3,944 | 8,157 | 8,416 | ||||||||||||
Total Comprehensive Income (Loss) | $ | 4,414 | $ | 2,501 | $ | (6,754 | ) | $ | 1,247 | |||||||
The components of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss, net of tax, are as follows (in thousands):
January 1, 2012 | July 3, 2011 | |||||||
Cumulative Translation Adjustments | $ | 16,703 | $ | 25,989 | ||||
Unrealized Loss on Derivative Instruments | (5,345 | ) | (2,243 | ) | ||||
Unrecognized Pension & Postretirement Obligation | (259,087 | ) | (267,244 | ) | ||||
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss | $ | (247,729 | ) | $ | (243,498 | ) | ||
6. Investments
This caption represents the Company’s investments in unconsolidated affiliated companies consisting of its 30% and 50% owned joint ventures. Such investments are accounted for under the equity method of accounting. As of January 1, 2012 and July 3, 2011, the Company’s investment in these joint ventures totaled $20.5 million and $21.0 million, respectively.
Combined financial information of the unconsolidated affiliated companies accounted for by the equity method, generally on a lag of 3 months or less, was as follows (in thousands):
Unaudited results of operations of unconsolidated affiliated companies for the three and six months ended January 1, 2012 and December 26, 2010:
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
January 1, 2012 | December 26, 2010 | January 1, 2012 | December 26, 2010 | ||||||||||||||
Results of Operations: | |||||||||||||||||
Sales | $ | 32,262 | $ | 30,933 | $ | 64,577 | $ | 59,784 | |||||||||
Cost of Goods Sold | 25,843 | 24,495 | 51,474 | 48,317 | |||||||||||||
Gross Profit | $ | 6,419 | $ | 6,438 | $ | 13,103 | $ | 11,467 | |||||||||
Net Income | $ | 2,455 | $ | 3,149 | $ | 5,225 | $ | 5,241 | |||||||||
9
Unaudited balance sheets of unconsolidated affiliated companies as of January 1, 2012 and July 3, 2011:
January 1, 2012 | July 3, 2011 | ||||||||
Financial Position: | |||||||||
Assets: | |||||||||
Current Assets | $ | 55,295 | $ | 51,838 | |||||
Non-Current Assets | 15,580 | 18,292 | |||||||
$ | 70,875 | $ | 70,130 | ||||||
Liabilities: | |||||||||
Current Liabilities | $ | 21,332 | $ | 15,809 | |||||
Non-Current Liabilities | 4,589 | 5,749 | |||||||
$ | 25,921 | $ | 21,558 | ||||||
Equity | $ | 44,954 | $ | 48,572 | |||||
Net sales to equity method investees were approximately $1.1 million and $3.6 million for the six months ended January 1, 2012 and December 26, 2010, respectively. Purchases of finished products from equity method investees were approximately $61.7 million and $52.1 million for the six months ended January 1, 2012 and December 26, 2010.
7. Pension and Postretirement Benefits
The Company has noncontributory defined benefit retirement plans and postretirement plans covering certain employees. The following tables summarize the plans’ income and expense for the periods indicated (in thousands):
Pension Benefits | Other Postretirement Benefits | |||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended | Three Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
January 1, 2012 | December 26, 2010 | January 1, 2012 | December 26, 2010 | |||||||||||||
Components of Net Periodic Expense: | ||||||||||||||||
Service Cost | $ | 3,489 | $ | 3,121 | $ | 102 | $ | 117 | ||||||||
Interest Cost on Projected Benefit Obligation | 14,284 | 14,143 | 1,695 | 1,707 | ||||||||||||
Expected Return on Plan Assets | (19,124 | ) | (19,202 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||
Amortization of: | ||||||||||||||||
Transition Obligation | 2 | 2 | — | — | ||||||||||||
Prior Service Cost (Credit) | 725 | 765 | (959 | ) | (757 | ) | ||||||||||
Actuarial Loss | 4,570 | 4,408 | 2,353 | 2,359 | ||||||||||||
Net Periodic Expense | $ | 3,946 | $ | 3,237 | $ | 3,191 | $ | 3,426 | ||||||||
10
Pension Benefits | Other Postretirement Benefits | |||||||||||||||
Six Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
January 1, 2012 | December 26, 2010 | January 1, 2012 | December 26, 2010 | |||||||||||||
Components of Net Periodic Expense: | ||||||||||||||||
Service Cost | $ | 6,885 | $ | 6,787 | $ | 204 | $ | 243 | ||||||||
Interest Cost on Projected Benefit Obligation | 28,635 | 28,344 | 3,375 | 3,546 | ||||||||||||
Expected Return on Plan Assets | (38,348 | ) | (38,487 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||
Amortization of: | ||||||||||||||||
Transition Obligation | 4 | 4 | — | — | ||||||||||||
Prior Service Cost (Credit) | 1,450 | 1,530 | (1,918 | ) | (1,739 | ) | ||||||||||
Actuarial Loss | 9,246 | 8,885 | 4,590 | 5,141 | ||||||||||||
Net Periodic Expense | $ | 7,872 | $ | 7,063 | $ | 6,251 | $ | 7,191 | ||||||||
The Company expects to make benefit payments of approximately $2.9 million attributable to its non-qualified pension plans during fiscal 2012. During the first six months of fiscal 2012, the Company made payments of approximately $1.5 million for its non-qualified pension plans. The Company anticipates making benefit payments of approximately $22.2 million for its other postretirement benefit plans during fiscal 2012. During the first six months of fiscal 2012, the Company made payments of $9.3 million for its other postretirement benefit plans.
The Company is required to make minimum contributions to the qualified pension plan of approximately $28.8 million during fiscal 2012. During the first six months of fiscal 2012, the Company made cash contributions of $5.5 million to the qualified pension plan. The Company may be required to make further contributions in future years depending upon the actual return on plan assets and the funded status of the plan in future periods.
8. Stock Incentives
Stock based compensation expense is calculated by estimating the fair value of incentive stock awards granted and amortizing the estimated value over the awards' vesting period. Stock based compensation expense was $1.0 million and $3.6 million for the three and six months ended January 1, 2012, respectively. For the three and six months ended December 26, 2010, stock based compensation expense was $2.6 million and $8.0 million, respectively. Included in stock based compensation expense for the three and six months ended December 26, 2010 was an expense of $1.3 million due to the modification of certain vesting conditions for the Company’s stock incentive awards. The modification of the awards was made in connection with the Company’s previously announced organization changes that involved a planned reduction of salaried employees during the quarter ended December 26, 2010. The Company also recorded expenses of approximately $2.2 million for severance and other related employee separation costs associated with the reduction.
9. Derivative Instruments & Hedging Activities
The Company enters into derivative contracts designated as cash flow hedges to manage certain interest rate, foreign currency and commodity exposures. Company policy allows derivatives to be used only for identifiable exposures and, therefore, the Company does not enter into hedges for trading purposes where the sole objective is to generate profits.
The Company formally designates the financial instrument as a hedge of a specific underlying exposure and documents both the risk management objectives and strategies for undertaking the hedge. The Company formally assesses, both at the inception and at least quarterly thereafter, whether the financial instruments that are used in hedging transactions are effective at offsetting changes in the forecasted cash flows of the related underlying exposure. Because of the high degree of effectiveness between the hedging instrument and the underlying exposure being hedged, fluctuations in the value of the derivative instruments are generally offset by changes in the forecasted cash flows of the underlying exposures being hedged. Derivative financial instruments are recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as assets or liabilities, measured at fair value. The effective portion of gains or losses on the derivative designated as cash flow hedges are reported as a component of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss (AOCI) and reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. Any ineffective portion of a financial instrument's change in fair value is immediately recognized in earnings.
11
The Company enters into interest rate swaps to manage a portion of its interest rate risk from financing certain dealer and distributor inventories through a third party financing source. The swaps are designated as cash flow hedges and are used to effectively fix the interest payments to a third party financing source, exclusive of lender spreads, ranging from 1.36% to 1.60% for a notional principal amount of $60 million through July 2017.
The Company enters into forward foreign currency contracts to hedge the risk from forecasted third party and intercompany sales or payments denominated in foreign currencies. These obligations generally require the Company to exchange foreign currencies for U.S. Dollars, Euros, Japanese Yen, Australian Dollars or Canadian Dollars. These contracts generally do not have a maturity of more than twenty-four months.
The Company uses raw materials that are subject to price volatility. The Company hedges a portion of its exposure to the variability of cash flows associated with commodities used in the manufacturing process by entering into forward purchase contracts or commodity swaps. Derivative contracts designated as cash flow hedges are used by the Company to reduce exposure to variability in cash flows associated with future purchases of natural gas, aluminum and steel. These contracts generally do not have a maturity of more than twenty-four months.
The Company has considered the counterparty credit risk related to all its interest rate, foreign currency and commodity derivative contracts and does not deem any counterparty credit risk material at this time.
The notional amount of derivative contracts outstanding at the end of the period is indicative of the level of the Company’s derivative activity during the period. As of January 1, 2012 and July 3, 2011, the Company had the following outstanding derivative contracts (in thousands):
Contract | Notional Amount | |||||||
January 1, 2012 | July 3, 2011 | |||||||
Interest Rate: | ||||||||
LIBOR Interest Rate (U.S. Dollars) | Fixed | 60,000 | — | |||||
Foreign Currency: | ||||||||
Australian Dollar | Sell | 30,230 | 34,295 | |||||
Canadian Dollar | Sell | 3,000 | 10,700 | |||||
Euro | Sell | 49,800 | 41,500 | |||||
Japanese Yen | Buy | 217,000 | — | |||||
Commodity: | ||||||||
Natural Gas (Therms) | Buy | 7,710 | 11,187 | |||||
Aluminum (Metric Tons) | Buy | 26 | 8 | |||||
Steel (Metric Tons) | Buy | 2 | 1 | |||||
12
The location and fair value of derivative instruments reported in the Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets are as follows (in thousands):
Balance Sheet Location | Asset (Liability) Fair Value | |||||||
January 1, 2012 | July 3, 2011 | |||||||
Interest rate contract | ||||||||
Other Long-Term Liabilities | (841 | ) | — | |||||
Foreign currency contracts | ||||||||
Other Current Assets | 5,980 | 108 | ||||||
Accrued Liabilities | (752 | ) | (3,550 | ) | ||||
Other Long-Term Liabilities | — | (280 | ) | |||||
Commodity contracts | ||||||||
Other Current Assets | — | 26 | ||||||
Accrued Liabilities | (8,759 | ) | (1,937 | ) | ||||
Other Long-Term Liabilities | (312 | ) | (91 | ) | ||||
$ | (4,684 | ) | $ | (5,724 | ) | |||
The effect of derivatives designated as hedging instruments on the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Operations is as follows:
Three months ended January 1, 2012 | ||||||||||||||
Recognized in Earnings | ||||||||||||||
Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income on Derivatives, Net of Taxes (Effective Portion) | Classification of Gain (Loss) | Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from AOCI into Income (Effective Portion) | Recognized in Earnings (Ineffective Portion) | |||||||||||
Interest rate contract | $ | (304 | ) | Net Sales | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||
Foreign currency contracts - sell | (401 | ) | Net Sales | 1,182 | — | |||||||||
Foreign currency contracts - buy | — | Cost of Goods Sold | (57 | ) | — | |||||||||
Commodity contracts | (2,387 | ) | Cost of Goods Sold | (903 | ) | 8 | ||||||||
$ | (3,092 | ) | $ | 222 | $ | 8 | ||||||||
Three months ended December 26, 2010 | ||||||||||||||
Recognized in Earnings | ||||||||||||||
Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income on Derivatives, Net of Taxes (Effective Portion) | Classification of Gain (Loss) | Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from AOCI into Income (Effective Portion) | Recognized in Earnings (Ineffective Portion) | |||||||||||
Foreign currency contracts - sell | $ | (1,665 | ) | Net Sales | $ | 723 | $ | — | ||||||
Foreign currency contracts - buy | 36 | Cost of Goods Sold | (121 | ) | — | |||||||||
Commodity contracts | 155 | Cost of Goods Sold | (823 | ) | 38 | |||||||||
$ | (1,474 | ) | $ | (221 | ) | $ | 38 | |||||||
13
Six months ended January 1, 2012 | ||||||||||||||
Recognized in Earnings | ||||||||||||||
Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income on Derivatives, Net of Taxes (Effective Portion) | Classification of Gain (Loss) | Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from AOCI into Income (Effective Portion) | Recognized in Earnings (Ineffective Portion) | |||||||||||
Interest rate contract | $ | (513 | ) | Net Sales | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||
Foreign currency contracts - sell | 2,753 | Net Sales | (62 | ) | — | |||||||||
Foreign currency contracts - buy | — | Cost of Goods Sold | (57 | ) | — | |||||||||
Commodity contracts | (5,342 | ) | Cost of Goods Sold | (1,241 | ) | (22 | ) | |||||||
$ | (3,102 | ) | $ | (1,360 | ) | $ | (22 | ) | ||||||
Six months ended December 26, 2010 | ||||||||||||||
Recognized in Earnings | ||||||||||||||
Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income on Derivatives, Net of Taxes (Effective Portion) | Classification of Gain (Loss) | Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from AOCI into Income (Effective Portion) | Recognized in Earnings (Ineffective Portion) | |||||||||||
Foreign currency contracts - sell | $ | (7,698 | ) | Net Sales | $ | 1,761 | $ | — | ||||||
Foreign currency contracts - buy | 2 | Cost of Goods Sold | (452 | ) | — | |||||||||
Commodity contracts | (616 | ) | Cost of Goods Sold | (1,136 | ) | 82 | ||||||||
$ | (8,312 | ) | $ | 173 | $ | 82 | ||||||||
During the next twelve months, the amount of the January 1, 2012 Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss balance that is expected to be reclassified into earnings is expected to be $4.7 million.
10. Fair Value Measurements
The following guidance establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels:
Level 1: Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets.
Level 2: Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-driven valuations whose inputs are observable or whose significant value drivers are observable.
Level 3: Significant inputs to the valuation model are unobservable.
The following table presents information about the Company’s financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of January 1, 2012 and July 3, 2011 (in thousands):
14
Fair Value Measurement Using | ||||||||||||||||
January 1, 2012 | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | |||||||||||||
Assets: | ||||||||||||||||
Derivatives | $ | 5,980 | $ | — | $ | 5,980 | $ | — | ||||||||
Liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||
Derivatives | $ | 10,664 | $ | — | $ | 10,664 | $ | — | ||||||||
July 3, 2011 | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | |||||||||||||
Assets: | ||||||||||||||||
Derivatives | $ | 134 | $ | — | $ | 134 | $ | — | ||||||||
Liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||
Derivatives | $ | 5,858 | $ | — | $ | 5,858 | $ | — | ||||||||
11. Warranty
The Company recognizes the cost associated with its standard warranty on Engines and Products at the time of sale. The amount recognized is based on historical failure rates and current claim cost experience. The following is a reconciliation of the changes in accrued warranty costs for the reporting period (in thousands):
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
January 1, 2012 | December 26, 2010 | |||||||
Beginning Balance | $ | 45,995 | $ | 41,945 | ||||
Payments | (13,911 | ) | (13,275 | ) | ||||
Provision for Current Year Warranties | 14,696 | 13,631 | ||||||
Changes in Estimates | (1,145 | ) | 130 | |||||
Ending Balance | $ | 45,635 | $ | 42,431 | ||||
12. Income Taxes
As of July 3, 2011, the Company had $12.0 million of gross unrecognized tax benefits. Of this amount, $9.9 million represents the portion that, if recognized, would impact the effective tax rate. As of July 3, 2011, the Company had $5.7 million accrued for the payment of interest and penalties. For the six months ended January 1, 2012, the Company recorded a decrease to the tax reserve of $6.0 million, of which $1.2 million related to interest, as a result of the settlement of audits and the lapse in the statute of limitations in certain foreign jurisdictions.
The Company's annual effective tax rate reflects its best estimate of financial operating results and the estimated impact of foreign currency exchange rates. Changes in the mix of pretax income from all tax jurisdictions in which the Company operates will have an impact on the Company's effective tax rate. The fiscal 2012 estimated annual tax rate is based on the latest tax law changes.
Income tax returns are filed in the U.S., state, and foreign jurisdictions and related audits occur on a regular basis. In the U.S., the Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal income tax examinations before fiscal 2009 and is currently under audit by various state and foreign jurisdictions. With respect to the Company's major foreign jurisdictions, it is no longer subject to tax examinations before fiscal 2001.
13. Commitments and Contingencies
The Company is subject to various unresolved legal actions that arise in the normal course of its business. These actions typically relate to product liability (including asbestos-related liability), patent and trademark matters, and disputes with customers, suppliers, distributors and dealers, competitors and employees.
Starting with the first complaint in June 2004, various plaintiff groups filed complaints in state and federal courts across the country against the Company and other engine and lawnmower manufacturers alleging that the horsepower labels on the
15
products they purchased were inaccurate and that the Company conspired with other engine and lawnmower manufacturers to conceal the true horsepower of these engines ("Horsepower Class Actions"). On December 5, 2008, the Multidistrict Litigation Panel coordinated and transferred the cases to Judge Adelman of the U. S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin (In Re: Lawnmower Engine Horsepower Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation, Case No. 2:08-md-01999).
On February 24, 2010, the Company entered into a Stipulation of Settlement ("Settlement") that resolves all of the Horsepower Class Actions. The Settlement resolves all horsepower-labeling claims brought by all persons or entities in the United States who, beginning January 1, 1994 through the date notice of the Settlement is first given, purchased, for use and not for resale, a lawn mower containing a gas combustible engine up to 30 horsepower provided that either the lawn mower or the engine of the lawn mower was manufactured or sold by a defendant. On August 16, 2010, Judge Adelman issued a final order approving the Settlement as well as the settlements of all other defendants. In August and September 2010, several class members filed a Notice of Appeal of Judge Adelman's final approval order to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. All of those appeals were settled as of February 16, 2011 with no additional contribution from Briggs & Stratton.
As part of the Settlement, the Company denies any and all liability and seeks resolution to avoid further protracted and expensive litigation. The settling defendants as a group agreed to pay an aggregate amount of $51.0 million. However, the monetary contribution of the amount of each of the settling defendants is confidential. In addition, the Company, along with the other settling defendants, agreed to injunctive relief regarding their future horsepower labeling, as well as procedures that will allow purchasers of lawnmower engines to seek a one-year extended warranty free of charge. Under the terms of the Settlement, the balance of settlement funds were paid, and the one-year warranty extension program began to run, on March 1, 2011. As a result of the Settlement, the Company recorded a total charge of $30.6 million in the third quarter of fiscal year 2010 representing the total of the Company's monetary portion of the Settlement and the estimated costs of extending the warranty period for one year.
On March 19, 2010, new plaintiffs filed a complaint in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in Canada (Robert Foster et al. v. Sears Canada, Inc. et al., Docket No. 766-2010). On May 3, 2010, other plaintiffs filed a complaint in the Montreal Superior Court in Canada (Eric Liverman, et al. v. Deere & Company, et al., Docket No. 500-06-000507-109). Both Canadian complaints contain allegations and seek relief under Canadian law that are similar to the Horsepower Class Actions. The Company is evaluating the complaints and has not yet filed an answer or other responsive pleading to either one.
On May 14, 2010, the Company notified retirees and certain retirement eligible employees of various changes to the Company-sponsored retiree medical plans. The purpose of the amendments was to better align the plans offered to both hourly and salaried retirees. On August 16, 2010, a putative class of retirees who retired prior to August 1, 2006 and the United Steel Workers filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin (Merrill, Weber, Carpenter, et al; United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO/CLC v. Briggs & Stratton Corporation; Group Insurance Plan of Briggs & Stratton Corporation; and Does 1 through 20, Docket No. 10-C-0700), contesting the Company's right to make these changes. In addition to a request for class certification, the complaint seeks an injunction preventing the alleged unilateral termination or reduction in insurance coverage to the class of retirees, a permanent injunction preventing defendants from ever making changes to the retirees' insurance coverage, restitution with interest (if applicable) and attorneys' fees and costs. The Company moved to dismiss the complaint and believes the changes are within its rights. On April 21, 2011, the district court issued an order granting the Company's motion to dismiss the complaint. The plaintiffs filed a motion with the court to reconsider its order on May 17, 2011. On August 24, 2011, the court granted the plaintiffs' motion and vacated the dismissal of the case. The Company is seeking leave to appeal the court's decision directly to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.
Although it is not possible to predict with certainty the outcome of these unresolved legal actions or the range of possible loss, the Company believes the unresolved legal actions will not have a material adverse effect on its results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
14. Segment Information
The Company operates two reportable business segments that are managed separately based on fundamental differences in their operations. Summarized segment data is as follows (in thousands):
16
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
January 1, 2012 | December 26, 2010 | January 1, 2012 | December 26, 2010 | ||||||||||||||
NET SALES: | |||||||||||||||||
Engines | $ | 286,099 | $ | 297,827 | $ | 489,477 | $ | 503,441 | |||||||||
Products | 215,416 | 186,361 | 450,698 | 353,949 | |||||||||||||
Inter-Segment Eliminations | (53,568 | ) | (33,864 | ) | (94,931 | ) | (72,950 | ) | |||||||||
Total * | $ | 447,947 | $ | 450,324 | $ | 845,244 | $ | 784,440 | |||||||||
* International sales included in net sales based on product shipment destination | $ | 178,630 | $ | 208,610 | $ | 326,433 | $ | 326,459 | |||||||||
GROSS PROFIT: | |||||||||||||||||
Engines | $ | 49,352 | $ | 68,546 | $ | 86,235 | $ | 111,205 | |||||||||
Products | 26,819 | 12,084 | 54,429 | 29,391 | |||||||||||||
Inter-Segment Eliminations | (2,291 | ) | (2,309 | ) | (730 | ) | (281 | ) | |||||||||
Total | $ | 73,880 | $ | 78,321 | $ | 139,934 | $ | 140,315 | |||||||||
INCOME (LOSS) FROM OPERATIONS: | |||||||||||||||||
Engines | $ | 2,302 | $ | 20,186 | $ | (3,175 | ) | $ | 14,849 | ||||||||
Products | 577 | (14,115 | ) | 2,870 | (19,268 | ) | |||||||||||
Inter-Segment Eliminations | (2,291 | ) | (2,309 | ) | (730 | ) | (281 | ) | |||||||||
Total | $ | 588 | $ | 3,762 | $ | (1,035 | ) | $ | (4,700 | ) | |||||||
15. Debt
The following is a summary of the Company’s long-term indebtedness (in thousands):
January 1, 2012 | July 3, 2011 | |||||||
Revolving Credit Facility | $ | 15,000 | $ | — | ||||
6.875% Senior Notes | 225,000 | 225,000 | ||||||
$ | 240,000 | $ | 225,000 | |||||
On December 15, 2010, the Company issued $225 million of 6.875% Senior Notes ("Senior Notes") due December 15, 2020. The net proceeds of the offering were primarily used to redeem the outstanding principal of the 8.875% Senior Notes due March 15, 2011 ("Old Senior Notes"). In connection with the issuance of the Senior Notes, the Company incurred approximately $5.0 million in new debt issuance costs, which are being amortized over the life of the Senior Notes using the effective interest method. In addition, at the time of the refinancing the Company expensed approximately $3.7 million associated with the make-whole terms of the Old Senior Notes, $0.1 million in remaining debt issuance costs and $0.1 million of original issue discount. These refinancing charges are included in interest expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended December 26, 2010.
On October 13, 2011, the Company entered into a $500 million multicurrency credit agreement (the “Revolver”). The Revolver replaced the amended and restated multicurrency credit agreement dated as of July 12, 2007. The Revolver has a term of five years and all outstanding borrowings on the Revolver are due and payable on October 13, 2016. The initial maximum availability under the revolving credit facility is $500 million. Availability under the revolving credit facility is reduced by outstanding letters of credit. The Company may from time to time increase the maximum availability under the revolving credit facility by up to $250 million if certain conditions are satisfied. In connection with the refinancing and the issuance of the Revolver, the Company incurred approximately $2.0 million in new debt issuance costs, which are being amortized over the life of the Revolver using the straight-line method.
The Senior Notes and Revolver contain restrictive covenants. These covenants include restrictions on the Company’s ability to: pay dividends; repurchase shares; incur indebtedness; create liens; enter into sale and leaseback transactions; consolidate or merge with other entities; sell or lease all or substantially all of its assets; and dispose of assets or the proceeds of sales of its assets. The Revolver contains financial covenants that require the Company to maintain a minimum interest coverage ratio and impose a maximum leverage ratio. As of January 1, 2012, the Company was in compliance with these covenants.
17
16. Separate Financial Information of Subsidiary Guarantor of Indebtedness
Under the terms of the Company’s Senior Notes and the Revolver (collectively, the “Domestic Indebtedness”), Briggs & Stratton Power Products Group, LLC, a 100% owned subsidiary of the Company, is the joint and several guarantor of the Domestic Indebtedness (the “Guarantor”). The guarantees are full and unconditional guarantees, except for certain customary limitations. Additionally, if at any time a domestic subsidiary of the Company constitutes a significant domestic subsidiary, then such domestic subsidiary will also become a guarantor of the Domestic Indebtedness. Currently, all of the Domestic Indebtedness is unsecured. If the Company were to fail to make a payment of interest or principal on its due date, the Guarantor is obligated to pay the outstanding Domestic Indebtedness. The Company had the following outstanding amounts related to the guaranteed debt (in thousands):
January 1, 2012 Carrying Amount | Maximum Guarantee | |||||||
6.875% Senior Notes | $ | 225,000 | $ | 225,000 | ||||
Revolving Credit Facility | $ | 15,000 | $ | 500,000 | ||||
The following condensed supplemental consolidating financial information reflects the summarized financial information of the Company, its Guarantor and Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries (in thousands):
BALANCE SHEET
As of January 1, 2012
(Unaudited)
Briggs & Stratton Corporation | Guarantor Subsidiary | Non- Guarantor Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
Current Assets | $ | 493,956 | $ | 384,854 | $ | 269,541 | $ | (189,846 | ) | $ | 958,505 | |||||||||
Investment in Subsidiaries | 618,909 | — | — | (618,909 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||
Non-Current Assets | 440,031 | 223,137 | 49,123 | (33,705 | ) | 678,586 | ||||||||||||||
$ | 1,552,896 | $ | 607,991 | $ | 318,664 | $ | (842,460 | ) | $ | 1,637,091 | ||||||||||
Current Liabilities | $ | 297,671 | $ | 93,967 | $ | 103,166 | $ | (156,916 | ) | $ | 337,888 | |||||||||
Other Long-Term Obligations | 542,992 | 48,553 | 62,061 | (66,636 | ) | 586,970 | ||||||||||||||
Shareholders’ Investment | 712,233 | 465,471 | 153,437 | (618,908 | ) | 712,233 | ||||||||||||||
$ | 1,552,896 | $ | 607,991 | $ | 318,664 | $ | (842,460 | ) | $ | 1,637,091 | ||||||||||
BALANCE SHEET
As of July 3, 2011
(Unaudited)
Briggs & Stratton Corporation | Guarantor Subsidiary | Non- Guarantor Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
Current Assets | $ | 519,783 | $ | 343,266 | $ | 244,473 | $ | (138,858 | ) | $ | 968,664 | |||||||||
Investment in Subsidiaries | 617,553 | — | — | (617,553 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||
Non-Current Assets | 455,876 | 229,054 | 50,692 | (38,068 | ) | 697,554 | ||||||||||||||
$ | 1,593,212 | $ | 572,320 | $ | 295,165 | $ | (794,479 | ) | $ | 1,666,218 | ||||||||||
Current Liabilities | $ | 292,908 | $ | 88,888 | $ | 95,044 | $ | (132,457 | ) | $ | 344,383 | |||||||||
Other Long-Term Obligations | 562,361 | 20,988 | 45,012 | (44,469 | ) | 583,892 | ||||||||||||||
Shareholders’ Investment | 737,943 | 462,444 | 155,109 | (617,553 | ) | 737,943 | ||||||||||||||
$ | 1,593,212 | $ | 572,320 | $ | 295,165 | $ | (794,479 | ) | $ | 1,666,218 | ||||||||||
18
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
For the Three Months Ended January 1, 2012
(Unaudited)
Briggs & Stratton Corporation | Guarantor Subsidiary | Non- Guarantor Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
Net Sales | $ | 270,624 | $ | 180,007 | $ | 83,529 | $ | (86,213 | ) | $ | 447,947 | |||||||||
Cost of Goods Sold | 231,128 | 162,276 | 66,876 | (86,213 | ) | 374,067 | ||||||||||||||
Gross Profit | 39,496 | 17,731 | 16,653 | — | 73,880 | |||||||||||||||
Engineering, Selling, General and Administrative Expenses | 44,427 | 18,730 | 10,135 | — | 73,292 | |||||||||||||||
Equity in Income from Subsidiaries | (5,827 | ) | — | — | 5,827 | — | ||||||||||||||
Income (Loss) from Operations | 896 | (999 | ) | 6,518 | (5,827 | ) | 588 | |||||||||||||
Interest Expense | (4,738 | ) | (9 | ) | (49 | ) | — | (4,796 | ) | |||||||||||
Other Income, Net | 931 | 74 | 383 | — | 1,388 | |||||||||||||||
Income (Loss) before Income Taxes | (2,911 | ) | (934 | ) | 6,852 | (5,827 | ) | (2,820 | ) | |||||||||||
Provision (Credit) for Income Taxes | (5,608 | ) | (2,060 | ) | 2,151 | — | (5,517 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net Income (Loss) | $ | 2,697 | $ | 1,126 | $ | 4,701 | $ | (5,827 | ) | $ | 2,697 | |||||||||
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
For the Three Months Ended December 26, 2010
(Unaudited)
Briggs & Stratton Corporation | Guarantor Subsidiary | Non- Guarantor Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
Net Sales | $ | 285,078 | $ | 144,890 | $ | 90,036 | $ | (69,680 | ) | $ | 450,324 | |||||||||
Cost of Goods Sold | 228,169 | 142,724 | 70,790 | (69,680 | ) | 372,003 | ||||||||||||||
Gross Profit | 56,909 | 2,166 | 19,246 | — | 78,321 | |||||||||||||||
Engineering, Selling, General and Administrative Expenses | 42,500 | 19,231 | 12,828 | — | 74,559 | |||||||||||||||
Equity in Income (Loss) from Subsidiaries | 5,687 | — | — | (5,687 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||
Income (Loss) from Operations | 8,722 | (17,065 | ) | 6,418 | 5,687 | 3,762 | ||||||||||||||
Interest Expense | (8,953 | ) | (17 | ) | (38 | ) | — | (9,008 | ) | |||||||||||
Other Income (Expense), Net | 773 | 175 | 689 | — | 1,637 | |||||||||||||||
Income (Loss) before Income Taxes | 542 | (16,907 | ) | 7,069 | 5,687 | (3,609 | ) | |||||||||||||
Provision (Credit) for Income Taxes | 1,794 | (5,999 | ) | 1,848 | — | (2,357 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net Income (Loss) | $ | (1,252 | ) | $ | (10,908 | ) | $ | 5,221 | $ | 5,687 | $ | (1,252 | ) | |||||||
19
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
For the Six Months Ended January 1, 2012
(Unaudited)
Briggs & Stratton Corporation | Guarantor Subsidiary | Non- Guarantor Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
Net Sales | $ | 464,705 | $ | 390,573 | $ | 155,010 | $ | (165,044 | ) | $ | 845,244 | |||||||||
Cost of Goods Sold | 392,010 | 350,286 | 128,058 | (165,044 | ) | 705,310 | ||||||||||||||
Gross Profit | 72,695 | 40,287 | 26,952 | — | 139,934 | |||||||||||||||
Engineering, Selling, General and Administrative Expenses | 81,540 | 36,882 | 22,547 | — | 140,969 | |||||||||||||||
Equity in Income from Subsidiaries | (3,640 | ) | — | — | 3,640 | — | ||||||||||||||
Income (Loss) from Operations | (5,205 | ) | 3,405 | 4,405 | (3,640 | ) | (1,035 | ) | ||||||||||||
Interest Expense | (9,042 | ) | (21 | ) | (71 | ) | — | (9,134 | ) | |||||||||||
Other Income, Net | 2,410 | 165 | 608 | — | 3,183 | |||||||||||||||
Income (Loss) before Income Taxes | (11,837 | ) | 3,549 | 4,942 | (3,640 | ) | (6,986 | ) | ||||||||||||
Provision (Credit) for Income Taxes | (9,314 | ) | 1,541 | 3,310 | — | (4,463 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net Income (Loss) | $ | (2,523 | ) | $ | 2,008 | $ | 1,632 | $ | (3,640 | ) | $ | (2,523 | ) | |||||||
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
For the Six Months Ended December 26, 2010
(Unaudited)
Briggs & Stratton Corporation | Guarantor Subsidiary | Non- Guarantor Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
Net Sales | $ | 477,770 | $ | 295,362 | $ | 160,145 | $ | (148,837 | ) | $ | 784,440 | |||||||||
Cost of Goods Sold | 384,741 | 280,682 | 127,539 | (148,837 | ) | 644,125 | ||||||||||||||
Gross Profit | 93,029 | 14,680 | 32,606 | — | 140,315 | |||||||||||||||
Engineering, Selling, General and Administrative Expenses | 84,956 | 36,576 | 23,483 | — | 145,015 | |||||||||||||||
Equity in Loss from Subsidiaries | 6,489 | — | — | (6,489 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||
Income (Loss) from Operations | 1,584 | (21,896 | ) | 9,123 | 6,489 | (4,700 | ) | |||||||||||||
Interest Expense | (14,057 | ) | (37 | ) | (71 | ) | — | (14,165 | ) | |||||||||||
Other Income (Expense), Net | 1,818 | 313 | 942 | — | 3,073 | |||||||||||||||
Income (Loss) before Income Taxes | (10,655 | ) | (21,620 | ) | 9,994 | 6,489 | (15,792 | ) | ||||||||||||
Provision (Credit) for Income Taxes | (1,290 | ) | (7,644 | ) | 2,507 | — | (6,427 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net Income (Loss) | $ | (9,365 | ) | $ | (13,976 | ) | $ | 7,487 | $ | 6,489 | $ | (9,365 | ) | |||||||
20
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
For the Six Months Ended January 1, 2012
(Unaudited)
Briggs & Stratton Corporation | Guarantor Subsidiary | Non- Guarantor Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
Net Cash Used in Operating Activities | $ | (122,561 | ) | $ | (22,069 | ) | $ | (46,900 | ) | $ | 26,530 | $ | (165,000 | ) | ||||||
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Additions to Plant and Equipment | (16,386 | ) | (2,145 | ) | (1,173 | ) | — | (19,704 | ) | |||||||||||
Proceeds Received from Disposition of Plant and Equipment | 41 | 50 | 4 | — | 95 | |||||||||||||||
Cash Investment in Subsidiary | 2,141 | — | (5,765 | ) | 3,624 | — | ||||||||||||||
Payments for Acquisitions, Net of Cash Acquired | — | — | (2,673 | ) | — | (2,673 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities | (14,204 | ) | (2,095 | ) | (9,607 | ) | 3,624 | (22,282 | ) | |||||||||||
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net Borrowings (Repayments) on Loans, Notes Payable and Long-Term Debt | (2,859 | ) | 23,563 | 20,826 | (26,530 | ) | 15,000 | |||||||||||||
Capital Contributions | — | — | 3,624 | (3,624 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||
Debt Issuance Costs | (2,007 | ) | — | — | — | (2,007 | ) | |||||||||||||
Treasury Stock Purchases | (11,384 | ) | — | — | — | (11,384 | ) | |||||||||||||
Cash Dividends Paid | (5,565 | ) | — | — | — | (5,565 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities | (21,815 | ) | 23,563 | 24,450 | (30,154 | ) | (3,956 | ) | ||||||||||||
Effect of Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Changes on Cash and Cash Equivalents | — | — | (4,469 | ) | — | (4,469 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net Decrease in Cash and Cash Equivalents | (158,580 | ) | (601 | ) | (36,526 | ) | — | (195,707 | ) | |||||||||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Beginning | 158,672 | 1,372 | 49,595 | — | 209,639 | |||||||||||||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Ending | $ | 92 | $ | 771 | $ | 13,069 | $ | — | $ | 13,932 | ||||||||||
21
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
For the Six Months Ended December 26, 2010
(Unaudited)
Briggs & Stratton Corporation | Guarantor Subsidiary | Non- Guarantor Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Operating Activities | $ | (87,292 | ) | $ | (42,444 | ) | $ | 6,752 | $ | (5,666 | ) | $ | (128,650 | ) | ||||||
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Additions to Plant and Equipment | (15,933 | ) | (4,141 | ) | (1,267 | ) | — | (21,341 | ) | |||||||||||
Proceeds Received from Disposition of Plant and Equipment | 14 | 27 | 11 | — | 52 | |||||||||||||||
Cash Investment in Subsidiary | (92 | ) | — | — | 92 | — | ||||||||||||||
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities | (16,011 | ) | (4,114 | ) | (1,256 | ) | 92 | (21,289 | ) | |||||||||||
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net Borrowings on Loans, Notes Payable and Long-Term Debt | 15,944 | 44,875 | 9,817 | 5,666 | 76,302 | |||||||||||||||
Capital Contributions | — | — | 92 | (92 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||
Debt Issuance Costs | (4,994 | ) | — | — | — | (4,994 | ) | |||||||||||||
Cash Dividends Paid | (5,537 | ) | — | — | — | (5,537 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities | 5,413 | 44,875 | 9,909 | 5,574 | 65,771 | |||||||||||||||
Effect of Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Changes on Cash and Cash Equivalents | — | — | (905 | ) | — | (905 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents | (97,890 | ) | (1,683 | ) | 14,500 | — | (85,073 | ) | ||||||||||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Beginning | 100,880 | 3,675 | 11,999 | — | 116,554 | |||||||||||||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Ending | $ | 2,990 | $ | 1,992 | $ | 26,499 | $ | — | $ | 31,481 | ||||||||||
22
17. Subsequent Events
On January 25, 2012, the Board of Directors of the Company authorized a plan to move existing manufacturing from the Company's Newbern, Tennessee facility to its McDonough, Georgia facility. The Company will also close its Ostrava, Czech Republic plant, shifting production to the Company's Murray, Kentucky facility. Also, the Company will continue reducing capacity by reconfiguring and idling certain assets at its Poplar Bluff, Missouri facility. This decision was made after a comprehensive evaluation of the Company's manufacturing operations following significant and prolonged market declines.
The Newbern, Tennessee facility currently manufactures walk behind lawn mowers and snow throwers for the U.S. domestic market. The Ostrava, Czech Republic facility currently manufactures small engines for the outdoor power equipment industry.
These changes will result in the closing of the Company's facility in Newbern, Tennessee, affecting approximately 240 regular employees and 450 temporary employees. Additionally, the closing of the Ostrava, Czech Republic facility will affect approximately 77 regular employees. The Company does not anticipate significant employment changes at its Poplar Bluff, Missouri facility. The Company will provide assistance programs, continued benefits and outplacement services for the affected employees.
Operations in Ostrava and Newbern are expected to wind down by March 15, 2012 and May 15, 2012, respectively. The pre-tax expense related to the restructuring activities is estimated to be $50 million to $55 million, of which, $45 million to $50 million is expected to be realized in fiscal 2012. Included in these charges are estimated pre-tax charges of approximately $35 million to $37 million for non-cash asset impairments and approximately $15 million to $18 million of other cash expenditures. The Company anticipates annualized pre-tax savings of $18 million to $20 million due to the restructuring actions.
23
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following is management’s discussion and analysis of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations for the periods included in the accompanying consolidated condensed financial statements:
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
NET SALES
Consolidated net sales for the second quarter of fiscal 2012 were $447.9 million, a decrease of $2.4 million or 0.5% when compared to the same period a year ago.
Engines Segment fiscal 2012 second quarter net sales were $286.1 million, which was $11.7 million or 3.9% lower than the same period a year ago. This decrease in net sales was primarily driven by lower shipments to the European market, partially offset by a favorable mix of product shipped that reflected proportionally larger volumes of units used on snow throwers and portable and standby generators.
Products Segment fiscal 2012 second quarter net sales were $215.4 million, an increase of $29.1 million or 15.6% from the same period a year ago. The increase in net sales was primarily due to increased sales of portable and standby generators as channel inventories continue to be replenished following the recent storm activity, as well as higher shipments of snow equipment after channel inventories were depleted from the prior selling season.
Consolidated net sales for the first six months of fiscal 2012 were $845.2 million, an increase of $60.8 million or 7.8% when compared to the same period a year ago.
Engines Segment net sales for the first six months of fiscal 2012 were $489.5 million, which was $14.0 million or 2.8% lower than the same period a year ago. This decrease in net sales was primarily driven by lower shipment volumes of engines due to reduced consumer demand for lawn and garden products in the North America and European markets, partially offset by a favorable mix of product shipped that reflected proportionally larger volumes of units used on snow throwers and portable and standby generators.
Products Segment net sales for the first six months of fiscal 2012 were $450.7 million, an increase of $96.7 million or 27.3% from the same period a year ago. The increase in net sales was primarily due to increased sales of portable and standby generators due to widespread power outages in the U.S. as a result of a landed hurricane and subsequent snow storm on the United States East Coast earlier in the fiscal year, as well as increased shipments of snow equipment after channel inventories were depleted from the prior selling season. There were no landed hurricanes in fiscal 2011.
GROSS PROFIT PERCENTAGE
The consolidated gross profit percentage was 16.5% in the second quarter of fiscal 2012, down from 17.4% in the same period last year.
The Engines Segment gross profit percentage was 17.2% in the second quarter of fiscal 2012, lower from 23.0% in the second quarter of fiscal 2011. The decrease was primarily due to higher manufacturing spending and unfavorable absorption on lower production volumes. Higher manufacturing spending is attributed to start-up costs of $5.0 million associated with launching our Phase III emissions compliant engines. Increased pricing offset increased commodity costs.
The Products Segment gross profit percentage was 12.4% for the second quarter of fiscal 2012, an increase from 6.5% in the second quarter of fiscal 2011. The increase over the prior year was attributable to improved pricing, production operational improvements of $5.8 million, and favorable absorption of $4.1 million on improved plant utilization, partially offset by increased commodity costs.
The consolidated gross profit percentage for the first six months of fiscal 2012 decreased to 16.6% from 17.9% in the first six months of fiscal 2011.
The Engines Segment gross profit percentage decreased to 17.6% for the first six months of fiscal 2012 from 22.1% in the first six months of fiscal 2011. The decrease was primarily due to unfavorable foreign exchange of $4.0 million primarily
24
related to the Euro, and higher manufacturing spending associated with rising commodity costs and start-up costs of $6.0 million associated with launching our Phase III emissions compliant engines, partially offset by improved engine pricing.
The Products Segment gross profit percentage increased to 12.1% for the first six months of fiscal 2012 from 8.3% in the first six months of fiscal 2011. The increase over the prior year was primarily attributable to favorable foreign exchange of $1.7 million primarily related to the Australian dollar, improved pricing, production operational improvements of $11.9 million and favorable absorption of $4.8 million on improved plant utilization, partially offset by increased commodity costs.
ENGINEERING, SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
Engineering, selling, general and administrative expenses were $73.3 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2012, a decrease of $1.3 million or 1.7% from the second quarter of fiscal 2011. The decrease in the current year was primarily attributable to the absence of $3.5 million of severance and other related employee separation costs associated with a planned reduction of salaried employees during the second quarter ended December 26, 2010, partially offset by increased sales and marketing expenses and salaries expense.
Engineering, selling, general and administrative expenses were $141.0 million for the first six months of fiscal 2012, a decrease of $4.0 million or 2.8% from the first six months of fiscal 2011. The decrease was primarily attributable to the absence of $3.5 million of severance and other related employee separation costs associated with a planned reduction of salaried employees during the second quarter ended December 26, 2010 and lower stock based compensation expense, partially offset by increased sales and marketing expenses and salaries expense.
INTEREST EXPENSE
Interest expense was lower compared to the prior year periods by $4.2 million and $5.0 million for the second quarter and first six months of fiscal 2012, respectively. The decrease was due to $3.9 million of pre-tax charges associated with the refinancing of Senior Notes during the second quarter of fiscal 2011, which did not recur in the current fiscal year as well as lower average outstanding borrowings at lower interest rates in the current periods compared to the same periods a year ago.
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES
The effective tax rate for the second quarter and first six months of fiscal 2012 was 195.6% and 63.9%, respectively, compared to 65.3% and 40.7% in the same respective periods last year. The variation between years was primarily the result of a net benefit of $5.0 million due to the settlement of U.S. audits and the expiration of a non-US statute of limitation period in the second quarter.
RESTRUCTURING ACTIONS
On January 25, 2012, the Board of Directors of the Company authorized a plan to move existing manufacturing from the Company's Newbern, Tennessee facility to its McDonough, Georgia facility. The Company will also close its Ostrava, Czech Republic plant, shifting production to the Company's Murray, Kentucky facility. Also, the Company will continue reducing capacity by reconfiguring and idling certain assets at its Poplar Bluff, Missouri facility. This decision was made after a comprehensive evaluation of the Company's manufacturing operations following significant and prolonged market declines.
The Newbern, Tennessee facility currently manufactures walk behind lawn mowers and snow throwers for the U.S. domestic market. The Ostrava, Czech Republic facility currently manufactures small engines for the outdoor power equipment industry.
These changes will result in the closing of the Company's facility in Newbern, Tennessee, affecting approximately 240 regular employees and 450 temporary employees. Additionally, the closing of the Ostrava, Czech Republic facility will affect approximately 77 regular employees. The Company does not anticipate significant employment changes at its Poplar Bluff, Missouri facility. The Company will provide assistance programs, continued benefits and outplacement services for the affected employees.
25
Operations in Ostrava and Newbern are expected to wind down by March 15, 2012 and May 15, 2012, respectively. The pre-tax expense related to the restructuring activities is estimated to be $50 million to $55 million, of which, $45 million to $50 million is expected to be realized in fiscal 2012. Included in these charges are estimated pre-tax charges of approximately $35 million to $37 million for non-cash asset impairments and approximately $15 million to $18 million of other cash expenditures. The Company anticipates annualized pre-tax savings of $18 million to $20 million due to the restructuring actions.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash flows used by operating activities for the fiscal 2012 first six months were $165.0 million compared to $128.7 million in the fiscal 2011 first six months. Cash used in operating activities for the first six months of fiscal 2012 was primarily related to seasonal build of inventory levels and an increase of accounts receivable during the period. Approximately $23 million of the increase in accounts receivable is due to delayed funding under the Company's new dealer inventory financing facility with GE Capital, Commercial Distribution Finance. The delayed funding to the Company reduces the overall cost of funds.
Cash flows used by investing activities was $22.3 million and $21.3 million in the first six months of fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2011, respectively. The $1.0 million increase was primarily the result of $2.7 million of payments made for an acquisition during fiscal 2012, partially offset by lower purchases of plant and equipment compared to the first six months of last year.
Cash flows used by financing activities was $4.0 million in the first six months of fiscal 2012, due to treasury stock repurchases at a total cost of $11.4 million, $5.6 million of dividends paid and $2.0 million of debt issuance costs during the period, partially offset by $15.0 million of net borrowings during the period. Cash flows provided by financing was $65.8 million in the first six months of fiscal 2011, which was primarily attributable to the issuance of $225 million aggregate principal amount of 6.875% Senior Notes due December 15, 2020 during the second quarter of fiscal 2011, the net proceeds of which were primarily used to redeem the $203.7 million outstanding principal amount of the 8.875% Senior Notes due March 15, 2011. The Company also incurred $5.0 million of deferred financing costs in connection with the issuance of the 6.875% Senior Notes, made dividend payments of $5.5 million and made $55.0 million of net borrowings on the revolving line of credit during the first six months of fiscal 2011.
FUTURE LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
On December 15, 2010, the Company issued $225 million aggregate principal amount of 6.875% Senior Notes due December 15, 2020. Net proceeds were primarily used to redeem the remaining outstanding principal of the 8.875% Senior Notes due March 15, 2011.
On October 13, 2011, the Company entered into a $500 million multicurrency credit agreement (the “Revolver”). The Revolver replaced the amended and restated multicurrency credit agreement dated as of July 12, 2007. The Revolver has a term of five years and all outstanding borrowings on the Revolver are due and payable on October 13, 2016. The initial maximum availability under the revolving credit facility is $500 million. Availability under the revolving credit facility is reduced by outstanding letters of credit. The Company may from time to time increase the maximum availability under the revolving credit facility by up to $250 million if certain conditions are satisfied.
On August 10, 2011, the Board of Directors of the Company authorized up to $50 million in funds for use in a common share repurchase program with an expiration of June 30, 2013. The common share repurchase program authorizes the purchase of shares of the Company's common stock on the open market or in private transactions from time to time, depending on market conditions and certain governing loan covenants. As of the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2012, the Company repurchased 801,843 shares on the open market at an average price $14.20 per share. There were no shares repurchased in fiscal 2011.
Briggs & Stratton expects capital expenditures to be approximately $55 million to $60 million in fiscal 2012. These anticipated expenditures reflect our plans to continue to reinvest in efficient equipment and innovative new products.
The Company is required to make contributions to the qualified pension plan of approximately $28.8 million during fiscal 2012. The Company may be required to make further contributions in future years depending upon the actual return on plan assets and the funded status of the plan in future periods.
Management believes that available cash, cash generated from operations, existing lines of credit and access to debt
26
markets will be adequate to fund Briggs & Stratton’s operating and capital requirements for the foreseeable future.
The Revolver and the 6.875% Senior Notes contain restrictive covenants. These covenants include restrictions on the Company’s ability to: pay dividends; repurchase shares; incur indebtedness; create liens; enter into sale and leaseback transactions; consolidate or merge with other entities; sell or lease all or substantially all of its assets; and dispose of assets or the proceeds of sales of its assets. The Revolver contains financial covenants that require the Company to maintain a minimum interest coverage ratio and impose a maximum leverage ratio. As of January 1, 2012, the Company was in compliance with these covenants, and expects to be in compliance with all covenants during the remainder of fiscal 2012.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
There have been no material changes since the September 1, 2011 filing of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K.
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
There have been no material changes since the September 1, 2011 filing of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, except that on October 13, 2011 the Company entered into a 5-year $500 million multicurrency credit agreement, replacing the amended and restated multicurrency credit agreement dated as of July 12, 2007 that was scheduled to expire on July 12, 2012.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
There have been no material changes in the Company’s critical accounting policies since the September 1, 2011 filing of its Annual Report on Form 10-K. As discussed in our annual report, the preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions about future events that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Future events and their effects cannot be determined with absolute certainty. Therefore, the determination of estimates requires the exercise of judgment. Actual results inevitably will differ from those estimates, and such differences may be material to the financial statements.
The most significant accounting estimates inherent in the preparation of our financial statements include a goodwill assessment, estimates as to the realizability of accounts receivable and inventory assets, as well as estimates used in the determination of liabilities related to customer rebates, pension obligations, postretirement benefits, warranty, product liability, group health insurance, litigation and taxation. Various assumptions and other factors underlie the determination of these significant estimates. The process of determining significant estimates is fact specific and takes into account factors such as historical experience, current and expected economic conditions, product mix, and, in some instances, actuarial techniques. The Company re-evaluates these significant factors as facts and circumstances change.
NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
A discussion of new accounting pronouncements is included in the Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements of this Form 10-Q under the heading New Accounting Pronouncements and incorporated herein by reference.
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT ON FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This report contains certain forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. The words “believe”, “estimate”, “expect”, “forecast”, “intend”, “plan”, “project”, and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements are based on the Company’s current views and assumptions and involve risks and uncertainties that include, among other things, the ability to successfully forecast demand for our products; changes in interest rates and foreign exchange rates; the effects of weather on the purchasing patterns of consumers and original equipment manufacturers (OEMs); actions of engine manufacturers and OEMs with whom we compete; changes in laws and regulations; changes in customer and OEM demand; changes in prices of raw materials and parts that we purchase; changes in domestic and foreign economic conditions; the ability to bring new productive capacity on line efficiently and with good quality; outcomes of legal proceedings and claims; and other factors disclosed from time to time in our SEC filings or otherwise, including the factors discussed in Item 1A, Risk Factors, of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K and in its periodic reports on Form 10-Q.
27
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
There have been no material changes since the September 1, 2011 filing of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
The Company’s management, with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of such period, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective in recording, processing, summarizing and reporting, on a timely basis, information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act.
INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
There has not been any change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the first fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
A discussion of legal proceedings is included in the Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements of this Form 10-Q under the heading Commitments and Contingencies and incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
There have been no material changes since the September 1, 2011 filing of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
The table below sets forth the information with respect to purchases made by or behalf of the Company of its common stock during the quarterly period ended January 1, 2012.
2012 Fiscal Month | Total Number of Shares Purchased | Average Price Paid per Share | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of a Publicly Announced Program (1) | Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Program (1) | ||||||||||
October 3, 2011 to October 30, 2011 | 263,425 | $ | 14.18 | 263,425 | $ | 43,146,332 | ||||||||
October 31, 2011 to November 27, 2011 | 245,067 | 14.41 | 245,067 | 39,614,917 | ||||||||||
November 28, 2011 to January 1, 2012 | 74,151 | 13.49 | 74,151 | 38,614,620 | ||||||||||
Total Second Quarter | 582,643 | $ | 14.19 | 582,643 | $ | 38,614,620 | ||||||||
(1) | On August 10, 2011, the Board of Directors of the Company authorized up to $50 million in funds for use in a common share repurchase program with an expiration of June 30, 2013. |
28
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
Exhibit Number | Description | |
4.1 | Multicurrency Credit Agreement, dated as of October 13, 2011, among Briggs & Stratton Corporation, Briggs & Stratton AG, the financial institutions from time to time party thereto and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 13, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference) | |
31.1 | Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002 (Filed herewith) | |
31.2 | Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002 (Filed herewith) | |
32.1 | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002 (Furnished herewith) | |
32.2 | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002 (Furnished herewith) | |
101 | The following materials from the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 1, 2012 formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) the Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets, (ii) the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Operations, (iii) the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Cash Flows, and (iv) related Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements | |
29
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
BRIGGS & STRATTON CORPORATION | |||
(Registrant) | |||
Date: February 7, 2012 | /s/ David J. Rodgers | ||
David J. Rodgers | |||
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Duly Authorized Officer | |||
30
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit Number | Description | |
4.1 | Multicurrency Credit Agreement, dated as of October 13, 2011, among Briggs & Stratton Corporation, Briggs & Stratton AG, the financial institutions from time to time party thereto and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 13, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference) | |
31.1 | Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002 (Filed herewith) | |
31.2 | Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002 (Filed herewith) | |
32.1 | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002 (Furnished herewith) | |
32.2 | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002 (Furnished herewith) | |
101 | The following materials from the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 1, 2012 formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) the Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets, (ii) the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Operations, (iii) the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Cash Flows, and (iv) related Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements | |
31