Edgar Filing: ENSIGN GROUP, INC

WebFilings | EDGAR view

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

_____________________________

FORM 10-Q



x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011.



o	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

For the transition period from to .

Commission file number: 001-33757

__________________________

THE ENSIGN GROUP, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)



Delaware	33-0861263
(State or Other Jurisdiction of	(I.R.S. Employer
Incorporation or Organization)	Identification No.)

27101 Puerta Real, Suite 450

Mission Viejo, CA 92691

(Address of Principal Executive Offices and Zip Code)

(949) 487-9500

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

N/A

(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, If Changed Since Last Report)

_____________________________

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x Yes o No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). o Yes o No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):



Large accelerated filer o	Accelerated filer x	Non-accelerated filer o	Smaller reporting company o
		(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by a check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). o Yes x No

As of April 30, 2011, 20,903,105 shares of the registrant’s common stock were outstanding.

THE ENSIGN GROUP, INC.

QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q

FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2011

TABLE OF CONTENTS



Part I. Financial Information

Item 1. Financial Statements (unaudited):	3

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010	3

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010	4

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010	5

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	6

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	24

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	43

Item 4. Controls and Procedures	43

Part II. Other Information

Item 1. Legal Proceedings	43

Item 1A. Risk Factors	44

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	70

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities	70

Item 4. (Removed and Reserved)	70

Item 5. Other Information	70

Item 6. Exhibits	70

Signatures	72

Exhibit 31.1
Exhibit 31.2
Exhibit 32.1
Exhibit 32.2

Table of Contents

Part I. Financial Information

Item 1. Financial Statements

THE ENSIGN GROUP, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except par values)

(Unaudited)



	March 31, 2011			December 31, 2010
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	50,973		$	72,088
Accounts receivable—less allowance for doubtful accounts of $10,856 and $9,793 at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively	76,474			69,437
Prepaid income taxes	—			1,333
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	7,661			7,175
Deferred tax asset—current	8,696			9,975
Total current assets	143,804			160,008
Property and equipment, net	311,372			262,527
Insurance subsidiary deposits and investments	15,751			16,358
Escrow deposits	—			14,422
Deferred tax asset	5,973			4,987
Restricted and other assets	8,665			6,509
Intangible assets, net	4,427			4,070
Goodwill	10,339			10,339
Other indefinite-lived intangibles	672			672
Total assets	$	501,003		$	479,892
Liabilities and stockholders’ equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	20,027		$	17,897
Accrued wages and related liabilities	33,191			37,377
Accrued self-insurance liabilities—current	12,742			11,480
Income taxes payable	6,152			—
Other accrued liabilities	13,445			13,557
Current maturities of long-term debt	3,165			3,055
Total current liabilities	88,722			83,366
Long-term debt—less current maturities	138,656			139,451
Accrued self-insurance liabilities—less current portion	29,019			25,920
Deferred rent and other long-term liabilities	2,663			2,952
Commitments and contingencies (Note 14)
Stockholders’ equity:
Common stock; $0.001 par value; 75,000 shares authorized; 21,462 and 20,898 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2011, respectively, and 21,397 and 20,815 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2010, respectively	21			21
Additional paid-in capital	72,861			70,814
Retained earnings	172,757			161,168
Common stock in treasury, at cost, 564 and 582 shares at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively	(3,696		)	(3,800		)
Total stockholders’ equity	241,943			228,203
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	501,003		$	479,892

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

THE ENSIGN GROUP, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(In thousands, except per share data)

(Unaudited)



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2011			2010
Revenue	$	182,943		$	154,174
Expense:
Cost of services (exclusive of facility rent and depreciation and amortization shown separately below)	143,155			123,183
Facility rent—cost of services	3,616			3,575
General and administrative expense	7,401			5,774
Depreciation and amortization	5,059			3,955
Total expenses	159,231			136,487
Income from operations	23,712			17,687
Other income (expense):
Interest expense	(2,727		)	(2,280		)
Interest income	55			67
Other expense, net	(2,672		)	(2,213		)
Income before provision for income taxes	21,040			15,474
Provision for income taxes	8,294			6,126
Net income	$	12,746		$	9,348
Net income per share:
Basic	$	0.61		$	0.45
Diluted	$	0.59		$	0.44
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
Basic	20,854			20,686
Diluted	21,516			21,074

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

THE ENSIGN GROUP, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2011			2010
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	12,746		$	9,348
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	5,059			3,955
Amortization of deferred financing fees and debt discount	168			191
Deferred income taxes	294			(715		)
Provision for doubtful accounts	2,227			1,550
Stock-based compensation	831			649
Excess tax benefit from share based compensation	(441		)	(333		)
Loss on disposition of property and equipment	(3		)	21
Change in operating assets and liabilities
Accounts receivable	(9,264		)	(8,316		)
Prepaid income taxes	1,333			1,242
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	502			632
Insurance subsidiary deposits and investments	607			(175		)
Accounts payable	1,236			(419		)
Accrued wages and related liabilities	(4,186		)	(1,388		)
Income taxes payable	6,592			—
Other accrued liabilities	(119		)	2,149
Accrued self-insurance	1,396			1,481
Deferred rent liability	(289		)	453
Net cash provided by operating activities	18,689			10,325
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchase of property and equipment	(9,001		)	(6,415		)
Cash payment for business acquisitions	(37,074		)	(7,617		)
Cash payment for asset acquisitions	(7,339		)	—
Escrow deposits	—			(500		)
Escrow deposits used to fund business acquisitions	14,422			7,595
Cash proceeds from the sale of fixed assets	51			58
Restricted and other assets	(278		)	1
Net cash used in investing activities	(39,219		)	(6,878		)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Payments on long term debt	(715		)	(542		)
Issuance of treasury stock upon exercise of options	103			132
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of options	775			264
Dividends paid	(1,150		)	(1,032		)
Excess tax benefit from share based compensation	441			333
Payments of deferred financing costs	(39		)	(5		)
Net cash used in financing activities	(585		)	(850		)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	(21,115		)	2,597
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of period	72,088			38,855
Cash and cash equivalents end of period	$	50,973		41,452
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	2,900		$	2,222
Income taxes	$	7,870		$	6,065
Accrued capital expenditures	$	895		$	—

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

THE ENSIGN GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)

(Unaudited)

1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

The Company — The Ensign Group, Inc., through its subsidiaries (collectively, Ensign or the Company), provides skilled nursing and rehabilitative care services through the operation of 86 facilities and one home health and hospice operation as of March 31, 2011, located in California, Arizona, Texas, Washington, Utah, Colorado and Idaho. All of these facilities are skilled nursing facilities, other than five stand-alone assisted living facilities in California, Arizona, Texas and Colorado and seven campuses that offer both skilled nursing and assisted living services located in California, Texas, Arizona and Utah. The Company’s facilities, each of which strives to be the facility of choice in the community it serves, provide a broad spectrum of skilled nursing and assisted living services, physical, occupational and speech therapies, and other rehabilitative and healthcare services, for both long-term residents and short-stay rehabilitation patients. The Company’s facilities have a collective capacity of approximately 10,300 operational skilled nursing, assisted living and independent living beds. As of March 31, 2011, the Company owned 57 of its 86 facilities and operated an additional 29 facilities through long-term lease arrangements, and had options to purchase 8 of those 29 facilities.

The Ensign Group, Inc. is a holding company with no direct operating assets, employees or revenue. All of the Company’s facilities are operated by separate, wholly-owned, independent subsidiaries, each of which has its own management, employees and assets. One of the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiaries, referred to as the Service Center, provides centralized accounting, payroll, human resources, information technology, legal, risk management and other centralized services to the other operating subsidiaries through contractual relationships with such subsidiaries. The Company also has a wholly-owned captive insurance subsidiary (the Captive) that provides some claims-made coverage to the Company’s operating subsidiaries for general and professional liability, as well as coverage for certain workers’ compensation insurance liabilities.

Like the Company’s facilities, the Service Center and the Captive are operated by separate, wholly-owned, independent subsidiaries that have their own management, employees and assets. References herein to the consolidated “Company” and “its” assets and activities, as well as the use of the terms “we,” “us,” “our” and similar verbiage in this quarterly report is not meant to imply that The Ensign Group, Inc. has direct operating assets, employees or revenue, or that any of the facilities, the Service Center or the Captive are operated by the same entity.

Other Information — The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements as of March 31, 2011 and for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 (collectively, the Interim Financial Statements), are unaudited. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual consolidated financial statements have been condensed or omitted, as permitted under applicable rules and regulations. Readers of the Interim Financial Statements should refer to the Company’s audited consolidated statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2010 which are included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K, File No. 001-33757 (the Annual Report) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC). Management believes that the Interim Financial Statements reflect all adjustments which are of a normal and recurring nature necessary to present fairly the Company’s financial position and results of operations in all material respects. The results of operations presented in the Interim Financial Statements are not necessarily representative of operations for the entire year.

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation — The accompanying Interim Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The Company is the sole member or shareholder of various consolidated limited liability companies and corporations; each established to operate various acquired skilled nursing and assisted living facilities. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

Estimates and Assumptions — The preparation of Interim Financial Statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. The most significant estimates in the Company’s Interim Financial Statements relate to revenue, allowance for doubtful accounts, intangible assets and goodwill, impairment of long-lived assets, general and professional liability, worker’s compensation, and healthcare claims included in accrued self-insurance liabilities and income taxes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Table of Contents

THE ENSIGN GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Business Segments — The Company has a single reportable segment — long-term care services, which includes the operation of skilled nursing and assisted living facilities, home health, and related ancillary services. The Company’s single reportable segment is made up of several individual operating segments grouped together principally based on their geographical locations within the United States. Based on the similar economic and other characteristics of each of the operating segments, management believes the Company meets the criteria for aggregating its operating segments into a single reporting segment.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments — The Company’s financial instruments consist principally of cash and cash equivalents, debt security investments, accounts receivable, insurance subsidiary deposits, accounts payable and borrowings. The Company believes all of the financial instruments’ recorded values approximate fair values because of their nature and respective short durations. The Company’s fixed-rate debt instruments do not actively trade in an established market. The fair values of this debt are estimated by discounting the principal and interest payments at rates available to the Company for debt with similar terms and maturities. See further discussion of debt security investments at Note 4.

Revenue Recognition — The Company recognizes revenue when the following four conditions have been met: (i) there is persuasive evidence that an arrangement exists; (ii) delivery has occurred or service has been rendered; (iii) the price is fixed or determinable; and (iv) collection is reasonably assured. Revenue from the Medicare and Medicaid programs accounted for approximately 76% of the Company’s revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010. The Company records revenue from these governmental and managed care programs as services are performed at their expected net realizable amounts under these programs. The Company’s revenue from governmental and managed care programs is subject to audit and retroactive adjustment by governmental and third-party agencies. Consistent with healthcare industry accounting practices, any changes to these governmental revenue estimates are recorded in the period the change or adjustment becomes known based on final settlements. The Company recorded retroactive adjustments that increased revenue by $546 and $315 for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

The Company’s service specific revenue recognition policies are as follows:

Skilled Nursing Revenue

The Company’s revenue is derived primarily from providing long-term healthcare services to residents and is recognized on the date services are provided at amounts billable to individual residents. For residents under reimbursement arrangements with third-party payors, including Medicaid, Medicare and private insurers, revenue is recorded based on contractually agreed-upon amounts on a per patient, daily basis. The Company records revenue from private pay patients, at the agreed upon rate, as services are performed.

Home Health and Hospice Revenue Recognition

Episodic Based Revenue — Net service revenue is typically recorded on a 60-day episode payment rate. The Company makes adjustments to revenue on completed episodes to reflect differences between estimated and actual payment amounts, an inability to obtain appropriate billing documentation or authorizations acceptable to the payor and other reasons unrelated to credit risk. The Company records an estimate for the impact of such payment adjustments based on its historical experience. In addition to revenue recognized on completed episodes, the Company also recognizes a portion of revenue associated with episodes in progress. Episodes in progress are 60-day episodes of care that begin during the reporting period, but were not completed as of the end of the period. The Company estimates this revenue on a monthly basis based upon historical trends. The primary factors underlying this estimate are the number of episodes in progress at the end of the reporting period, expected Medicare revenue per episode and the Company's estimate of the average percentage complete based on days completed of the episode of care.

Non-episodic Based Revenue — Gross revenue is recorded on an accrual basis based upon the date of service at amounts equal to our established or estimated per-visit rates, as applicable.

Hospice Revenue — Gross revenue is recorded on an accrual basis based upon the date of service at amounts equal to the estimated payment rates. The estimated payment rates are daily rates for each of the levels of care we deliver. The Company makes adjustments to revenue for an inability to obtain appropriate billing documentation or authorizations acceptable to the payor and other reasons unrelated to credit risk. The Company estimates the impact of these adjustments based on its historical experience, which primarily includes historical collection rates on Medicare claims, and records it during the period services are rendered as an estimated revenue adjustment and as a reduction to its outstanding patient accounts receivable. Additionally, as Medicare hospice revenue is subject to an inpatient cap limit and an overall payment cap, the Company monitors its provider numbers and estimate amounts due back to Medicare if a cap has been exceeded. The Company records these adjustments as a

Table of Contents

THE ENSIGN GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

reduction to revenue and increases other accrued liabilities.

Accounts Receivable — Accounts receivable consist primarily of amounts due from Medicare and Medicaid programs, other government programs, managed care health plans and private payor sources. Estimated provisions for doubtful accounts are recorded to the extent it is probable that a portion or all of a particular account will not be collected.

In evaluating the collectability of accounts receivable, the Company considers a number of factors, including the age of the accounts, changes in collection patterns, the composition of patient accounts by payor type and the status of ongoing disputes with third-party payors. The percentages applied to the aged receivable balances are based on the Company’s historical experience and time limits, if any, for managed care, Medicare and Medicaid. The Company periodically refines its procedures for estimating the allowance for doubtful accounts based on experience with the estimation process and changes in circumstances.

Property and Equipment — Property and equipment are initially recorded at their historical cost. Repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the depreciable assets (ranging from three to 30 years). Leasehold improvements are amortized on a straight-line basis over the shorter of their estimated useful lives or the remaining lease term.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets — The Company reviews the carrying value of long-lived assets that are held and used in the Company’s operations for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of these assets is determined based upon expected undiscounted future net cash flows from the operations to which the assets relate, utilizing management’s best estimate, appropriate assumptions, and projections at the time. If the carrying value is determined to be unrecoverable from future operating cash flows, the asset is deemed impaired and an impairment loss would be recognized to the extent the carrying value exceeded the estimated fair value of the asset. The Company estimates the fair value of assets based on the estimated future discounted cash flows of the asset. Management has evaluated its long-lived assets and has not identified any impairment during the three months ended March 31, 2011 or 2010.

Intangible Assets and Goodwill — Intangible assets consist primarily of favorable lease, lease acquisition costs, patient base, trade names and other indefinite-lived intangibles. Favorable leases and lease acquisition costs are amortized over the life of the lease of the facility, typically ranging from ten to 20 years. Patient base is amortized over a period of three to eight months, depending on the classification of the patients and the level of occupancy in a new acquisition on the acquisition date. Trade names at facilities are amortized over 30 years.

Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of identifiable net assets acquired in business combinations. Goodwill is subject to annual testing for impairment. In addition, goodwill is tested for impairment if events occur or circumstances change that would reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. The Company defines reporting units as the individual facilities. The Company performs its annual test for impairment during the fourth quarter of each year. The Company did not record any impairment charges during the three months ended March 31, 2011.

Self-Insurance — The Company is partially self-insured for general and professional liability up to a base amount per claim (the self-insured retention) with an aggregate, one time deductible above this limit. Losses beyond these amounts are insured through third-party policies with coverage limits per occurrence, per location and on an aggregate basis for the Company. For claims made after April 1, 2011, the combined self-insured retention was $500 per claim with an aggregate $1,750 deductible limit. For all facilities, except those located in Colorado, the third-party coverage above these limits was $1,000 per occurrence, $3,000 per facility, with a $10,000 blanket aggregate and an additional state-specific aggregate where required by state law. In Colorado, the third-party coverage above these limits was $1,000 per occurrence and $3,000 per facility, which is independent of the $10,000 blanket aggregate applicable to our other 82 facilities.

The self-insured retention and deductible limits for general and professional liability and worker’s compensation are self-insured through the Captive, the related assets and liabilities of which are included in the accompanying Interim Financial Statements. The Captive is subject to certain statutory requirements as an insurance provider. These requirements include, but are not limited to, maintaining statutory capital. The Company’s policy is to accrue amounts equal to the actuarially estimated costs to settle open claims of insureds, as well as an estimate of the cost of insured claims that have been incurred but not reported. The Company develops information about the size of the ultimate claims based on historical experience, current industry information and actuarial analysis, and evaluates the estimates for claim loss exposure on a quarterly basis. Accrued general liability and professional malpractice liabilities recorded on an undiscounted basis in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets were $27,423 and $26,037 as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.

Table of Contents

THE ENSIGN GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

The Company’s operating subsidiaries are self-insured for workers’ compensation liability in California. To protect itself against loss exposure in California with this policy, the Company has purchased individual stop-loss insurance coverage that insures individual claims that exceed $500 for each claim. In Texas, the operating subsidiaries have elected non-subscriber status for workers’ compensation claims and, effective February 1, 2011, the Company has purchased individual stop-loss coverage that insures individual claims that exceed $750 for each claim. The Company’s operating subsidiaries in other states have third party guaranteed cost coverage. In California and Texas, the Company accrues amounts equal to the estimated costs to settle open claims, as well as an estimate of the cost of claims that have been incurred but not reported. The Company uses actuarial valuations to estimate the liability based on historical experience and industry information. Accrued workers’ compensation liabilities are recorded on an undiscounted basis in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets and were $9,332 and $9,203 as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.

The Company provides self-insured medical (including prescription drugs) and dental healthcare benefits to the majority of its employees. The Company is fully liable for all financial and legal aspects of these benefit plans. To protect itself against loss exposure with this policy, the Company has purchased individual stop-loss insurance coverage that insures individual claims that exceed $250 for each covered person with an aggregate individual stop loss deductible of $75. These limits reset every plan year subject to a lifetime maximum of $5,000 per each covered person on the Preferred Provider Organization (PPO) and Exclusive Provider Organization (EPO) plans and an unlimited lifetime plan maximum on the Health Maintenance Organization (HMO) plan. The aforementioned coverage only applies to claims paid during the plan year. The Company’s accrued liability under these plans recorded on an undiscounted basis in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets was $2,041 and $2,160 at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.

In addition, in accordance with guidance provided by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) in August 2010, the Company recorded an asset and equal liability of $2,965, in order to present the ultimate costs of malpractice claims and the anticipated insurance recoveries on a gross basis. Prior to fiscal year 2011, these liabilities were recorded net of anticipated insurance recoveries. See additional discussion in "Adoption of New Accounting Pronouncements" below.

The Company believes that adequate provision has been made in the Interim Financial Statements for liabilities that may arise out of patient care, workers’ compensation, healthcare benefits and related services provided to date. The amount of the Company’s reserves was determined based on an estimation process that uses information obtained from both company-specific and industry data. This estimation process requires the Company to continuously monitor and evaluate the life cycle of the claims. Using data obtained from this monitoring and the Company’s assumptions about emerging trends, the Company, with the assistance of an independent actuary, develops information about the size of ultimate claims based on the Company’s historical experience and other available industry information. The most significant assumptions used in the estimation process include determining the trend in costs, the expected cost of claims incurred but not reported and the expected costs to settle or pay damage awards with respect to unpaid claims. The self-insured liabilities are based upon estimates, and while management believes that the estimates of loss are reasonable, the ultimate liability may be in excess of or less than the recorded amounts. Due to the inherent volatility of actuarially determined loss estimates, it is reasonably possible that the Company could experience changes in estimated losses that could be material to net income. If the Company’s actual liability exceeds its estimates of loss, its future earnings and financial condition would be adversely affected.

Income Taxes — Deferred tax assets and liabilities are established for temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and the tax basis of the Company’s assets and liabilities at tax rates in effect when such temporary differences are expected to reverse. The Company generally expects to fully utilize its deferred tax assets; however, when necessary, the Company records a valuation allowance to reduce its net deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized.

In determining the quarterly income tax rate for financial statements, the Company must consider expected annual income, permanent differences between financial reporting and tax recognition of income or expense and other factors. When the Company takes uncertain income tax positions that do not meet the recognition criteria, it records a liability for underpayment of income taxes and related interest and penalties, if any. In considering the need for and magnitude of a liability for such positions, the Company must consider the potential outcomes from a review of the positions by the taxing authorities

In determining the need for a valuation allowance, the annual income tax rate for interim periods, or the need for and magnitude of liabilities for uncertain tax positions, the Company makes certain estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions are based on, among other things, knowledge of operations, markets, historical trends and likely future changes and, when appropriate, the opinions of advisors with knowledge and expertise in certain fields. Due to certain risks associated with the Company’s estimates and assumptions, actual results could differ.

Table of Contents

THE ENSIGN GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Stock-Based Compensation — The Company measures and recognizes compensation expense for all share-based payment awards made to employees and directors including employee stock options based on estimated fair values, ratably over the requisite service period of the award. Net income has been reduced as a result of the recognition of the fair value of all stock options and restricted stock awards issued on and subsequent to January 1, 2006, the amount of which is contingent upon the number of future grants and other variables.

New Accounting Pronouncements — In December, 2010, the FASB amended its view on performing step two of a goodwill impairment analysis. The amendment does not prescribe a specific method of calculating the carrying value of a reporting unit in the performance of step one of the goodwill impairment test and requires entities with a zero or negative carrying value to assess, considering qualitative factors such as those listed in Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 350-20-35-30 Intangibles - Goodwill and Other, whether it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists. If an entity concludes that it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists, the entity must perform step two of the goodwill impairment test. For public entities, these amendments are effective for impairment tests performed during entities' fiscal years that begin after December 15, 2010. The Company will adopt this amendment during it's goodwill impairment analysis in the fourth quarter of the current year. The Company does not believe the adoption of this amendment will have a material effect on its financial statements.

Adoption of New Accounting Pronouncements — In August 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board clarified that health care entities should not net insurance recoveries against related claim liability. Further, such entities should determine the claim liability without considering insurance recoveries. Further, it was determined a cumulative-effect adjustment should be recognized in opening retained earnings in the period of adoption if a difference exists between any liabilities and insurance receivables recorded as a result of applying these amendments. These amendments are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2010. The Company adopted this guidance during the quarter ended March 31, 2011. See further discussion in Note 2 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements under "Self-Insurance."

In November 2010, the FASB provided clarification regarding pro forma revenue and earnings disclosure requirements for business combinations. These amendments specify that if a public entity presents comparative financial statements, the entity should disclose only revenue and earnings of the combined entity as though the business combination(s) that occurred during the current year has occurred as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period. The amendments also expand the supplemental pro forma disclosures to include a description of the nature and amount of material, nonrecurring pro forma adjustments directly attributable to the business combination included in the reported pro forma revenue and earnings. The amendments are effective prospectively for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period on or after December 15, 2010. The Company adopted these amendments on January 1, 2011, noting they did not have a material impact on the Company's financial statements.

Table of Contents

THE ENSIGN GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

3. COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE

Basic net income per share is computed by dividing net income attributable to common shares by the weighted average number of outstanding common shares for the period. The computation of diluted net income per share is similar to the computation of basic net income per share except that the denominator is increased to include contingently returnable shares and the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the dilutive potential common shares had been issued.

A reconciliation of the numerator and denominator used in the calculation of basic net income per common share follows:



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2011		2010
Numerator:
Net income	$	12,746	$	9,348
Denominator:
Weighted average shares outstanding for basic net income per share	20,854		20,686
Basic net income per common share	$	0.61	$	0.45

A reconciliation of the numerator and denominator used in the calculation of diluted net income per common share follows:



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2011		2010
Numerator:
Net income	$	12,746	$	9,348
Denominator:
Weighted average common shares outstanding	20,854		20,686
Plus: incremental shares from assumed conversion (1)	662		388
Adjusted weighted average common shares outstanding	21,516		21,074
Diluted net income per common share	$	0.59	$	0.44


(1)	For the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company had 9 and 776, respectively, options outstanding which are anti-dilutive and therefore not factored into the weighted average common shares amount above.

4. INSURANCE SUBSIDIARY DEPOSITS AND INVESTMENTS

On February 10, 2009, the Company purchased three separate AAA rated debt security investments for an aggregate purchase price of $12,183 with insurance subsidiary deposits and cash from the Captive. The debt securities had maturity dates in December 2010, July 2011 and December 2011 and were guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) under the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program upon maturity.

On December 1, 2010, the first of the three debt security investments matured and the funds of $4,000 were reinvested in a new debt security which matures on June 8, 2012. The new debt security investment is also AAA rated, and is backed by the FDIC.

At March 31, 2011, the Company had approximately $12,095 in debt security investments, which are held to maturity and carried at amortized cost. The fair value of the investments is determined based on “Level 1” inputs, which consist of unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets. The carrying value of the debt securities approximates fair value. The Company has the intent and the ability to hold these debt securities to maturity.

Table of Contents

THE ENSIGN GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

5. REVENUE AND ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

Revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 is summarized in the following tables:



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2011				2010
	Revenue		% of Revenue		Revenue		% of Revenue
Medicaid	$	66,225	36.2	%	$	61,653	40.0	%
Medicare	67,643		37.0	%	51,122		33.2	%
Medicaid — skilled	4,411		2.4	%	4,418		2.8	%
Total Medicaid and Medicare	138,279		75.6	%	117,193		76.0	%
Managed care	24,141		13.2	%	20,569		13.4	%
Private and other payors	20,523		11.2	%	16,412		10.6	%
Revenue	$	182,943	100.0	%	$	154,174	100.0	%

Accounts receivable as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 is summarized in the following table:



	March 31, 2011			December 31, 2010
Medicaid	$	22,234		$	20,712
Managed care	24,046			22,764
Medicare	26,913			22,826
Private and other payors	14,137			12,928
	87,330			79,230
Less allowance for doubtful accounts	(10,856		)	(9,793		)
Accounts receivable	$	76,474		$	69,437

6. ACQUISITIONS

The Company’s acquisition policy is generally to purchase or lease facilities to complement the Company’s existing portfolio of long-term care facilities. The results of all the Company’s operations are included in the accompanying Interim Financial Statements subsequent to the date of acquisition. Acquisitions are typically paid for in cash and are accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting. Where the Company enters into facility lease agreements, the Company typically does not pay any material amount to the prior facility operator nor does the Company acquire any assets or assume any liabilities, other than rights and obligations under the lease and operations transfer agreement, as part of the transaction. Some leases include options to purchase the facilities. As a result, from time to time, the Company will acquire facilities that the Company has been operating under third-party leases.

During the three months ended March 31, 2011, the Company acquired two skilled nursing facilities which also offer assisted living and independent living services, one independent living facility and one assisted living facility. The aggregate purchase price of the three business acquisitions was approximately $37,074, which was paid in cash. The facilities acquired during the three months ended March 31, 2011 are as follows:

•

On January 1, 2011, the Company purchased one skilled nursing facility which also offers assisted living and independent living services and one independent living facility in Texas for approximately $14,580 which was paid in cash. This acquisition added 123 operational skilled nursing beds, 77 assisted living units, 72 independent living units and 20 independent living cottages to the Company's operations. The Company also entered into a separate operations transfer agreement with the prior tenant as part of this transaction.


•	On February 1, 2011, the Company purchased one skilled nursing facility in Utah, which also offers assisted living and independent living services for approximately $16,569 which was paid in cash. This acquisition added 233 operational skilled nursing beds, 48 assisted living units and 68 independent living apartments to the Company's

Table of Contents

THE ENSIGN GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

operations. The Company also entered into a separate operations transfer agreement with the prior tenant as part of this transaction.


•	On March 18, 2011, the Company purchased one assisted living facility in California for approximately $5,925, which was paid in cash. This acquisition added 125 assisted living units to the Company's operations. The Company also entered into a separate operations transfer agreement with the prior tenant as part of this transaction.

In addition, the Company purchased the underlying assets of one of its skilled nursing facilities in Ventura, California as part of the March 18 transaction. The facility was purchased for approximately $7,339, which was paid in cash. This acquisition did not impact the Company's operational skilled nursing bed count.

The Company expensed $71 in acquisition related costs during the three months ended March 31, 2011.

The table below presents the allocation of the purchase price for the facilities acquired in business combinations during the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010:



	March 31,
	2011		2010
Land	$	4,905	$	841
Building and improvements	30,503		6,387
Equipment, furniture, and fixtures	1,016		289
Other intangible assets	650		100
	$	37,074	$	7,617

The Company’s acquisition strategy has been focused on identifying both opportunistic and strategic acquisitions within its target markets that offer strong opportunities for return on invested capital. The facilities acquired by the Company are frequently underperforming financially and can have regulatory and clinical challenges to overcome. Financial information, especially with underperforming facilities, is often inadequate, inaccurate or unavailable. Consequently, the Company believes that prior operating results are not meaningful, representative of the Company’s current operating results or indicative of the integration potential of its newly acquired facilities. The four businesses acquired during the three months ended March 31, 2011 were not material acquisitions to the Company individually or in the aggregate. Accordingly, pro forma financial information is not presented. These acquisitions have been included in the March 31, 2011 condensed consolidated balance sheet of the Company, and the operating results have been included in the condensed consolidated statement of income of the Company since the dates the Company gained effective control.

7. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Property and equipment consist of the following:



	March 31, 2011			December 31, 2010
Land	$	53,611		$	46,900
Buildings and improvements	218,433			179,189
Equipment	53,109			47,983
Furniture and fixtures	8,603			8,271
Leasehold improvements	24,558			24,147
Construction in progress	9,370			7,587
	367,684			314,077
Less accumulated depreciation	(56,312		)	(51,550		)
Property and equipment, net	$	311,372		$	262,527

Table of Contents

THE ENSIGN GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

8. INTANGIBLE ASSETS — Net



	Weighted	March 31, 2011							December 31, 2010
	Average Life	Gross Carrying		Accumulated					Gross Carrying		Accumulated
Intangible Assets	(Years)	Amount		Amortization			Net		Amount		Amortization			Net
Lease acquisition costs	15.5	$	910	$	(607	)	$	303	$	910	$	(592	)	$	318
Favorable lease	20.0	3,573		(534		)	3,039		3,573		(482		)	3,091
Patient base	0.6	1,428		(948		)	480		778		(728		)	50
Trade name	30.0	733		(128		)	605		733		(122		)	611
Total		$	6,644	$	(2,217	)	$	4,427	$	5,994	$	(1,924	)	$	4,070

Amortization expense was $293 and $328 for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Of the $293 in amortization expense incurred during the three months ended March 31, 2011, approximately $220 related to the amortization of patient base intangible assets at recently acquired facilities, which is typically amortized over a period of three to eight months, depending on the classification of the patients and the level of occupancy in a new acquisition on the acquisition date.

Estimated amortization expense for each of the years ending December 31 is as follows:



Year	Amount
2011 (remainder)	$	697
2012	291
2013	291
2014	289
2015	269
2016	248
Thereafter	2,342
	$	4,427

9. RESTRICTED AND OTHER ASSETS

Restricted and other assets consist primarily of capital reserves and deposits. Capital reserves are maintained as part of the mortgage agreements of the Company and certain of its landlords with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. These capital reserves are restricted for capital improvements and repairs to the related facilities.

Restricted and other assets consist of the following:



	March 31, 2011		December 31, 2010
Deposits with landlords	$	739	$	736
Capital improvement reserves with landlords and lenders	3,751		3,477
Debt issuance costs, net	2,197		2,296
Other assets	1,978		—
Restricted and other assets	$	8,665	$	6,509

Included in Other assets, as of March 31, 2011, are the Company's general and professional liability claims and related anticipated insurance recoveries recorded on a gross rather than net basis in accordance with an Accounting Standards Update issued by the FASB. Prior to fiscal year 2011, insurance claims liabilities were recorded net of anticipated recoveries. This balance represents the long term portion of the insurance claims recoverable asset.

Table of Contents

THE ENSIGN GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

10. OTHER ACCRUED LIABILITIES

Other accrued liabilities consist of the following:



	March 31, 2011		December 31, 2010
Quality assurance fee	$	1,478	$	1,706
Resident refunds payable	2,792		3,122
Deferred resident revenue	1,132		1,313
Cash held in trust for residents	1,506		1,523
Dividends payable	1,157		1,152
Property taxes	1,097		1,325
Other	4,283		3,416
Other accrued liabilities	$	13,445	$	13,557

Quality assurance fee represents amounts payable to California, Utah and Idaho in respect of a mandated fee based on resident days. Resident refunds payable includes amounts due to residents for overpayments and duplicate payments. Deferred resident revenue occurs when the Company receives payments in advance of services provided. Cash held in trust for residents reflects monies received from, or on behalf of, residents. Maintaining a trust account for residents is a regulatory requirement and, while the trust assets offset the liability, the Company assumes a fiduciary responsibility for these funds. The cash balance related to this liability is included in other current assets in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.

Table of Contents

THE ENSIGN GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

11. INCOME TAXES

The provision for income taxes for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 is summarized as follows:



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2011			2010
Current:
Federal	$	6,622		$	5,771
State	1,378			1,070
	8,000			6,841
Deferred:
Federal	319			(567		)
State	(25		)	(148		)
	294			(715		)
Total	$	8,294		$	6,126

The Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are summarized as follows:



	March 31, 2011			December 31, 2010
Deferred tax assets (liabilities):
Accrued expenses	$	16,048		$	15,968
Allowance for doubtful accounts	4,525			4,082
State taxes	—			533
Tax credits	1,039			1,063
Total deferred tax assets	21,612			21,646
State taxes	(640		)	—
Depreciation and amortization	(4,791		)	(4,973		)
Prepaid expenses	(1,512		)	(1,711		)
Total deferred tax liabilities	(6,943		)	(6,684		)
Net deferred tax assets	$	14,669		$	14,962

The Company is not currently under examination by any major income tax jurisdiction. In 2011, the statute of limitations will lapse on the Company's 2006 and 2007 income tax years for state and Federal purposes, respectively; however, the Company does not believe this lapse will significantly impact unrecognized tax benefits for any uncertain tax positions. The Company is not aware of any other event that might significantly impact the balance of unrecognized tax benefits in the next twelve months. The net balance of unrecognized tax benefits was not material to the Interim Financial Statements for the three months ended March 31, 2011 or 2010.

Table of Contents

THE ENSIGN GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

12. DEBT

On December 31, 2010, four of the Company's real estate holding subsidiaries executed a promissory note with RBS Asset Finance, Inc. (RBS) as Lender for an aggregate of $35,000 (RBS Loan). The RBS Loan was secured by Commercial Deeds of Trust, Security Agreements, Assignment of Leases and Rents and Fixture Fillings on the four properties and other related instruments and agreements, including without limitation a promissory note and a Company guaranty. The RBS Loan bears interest at a fixed rate of 6.04%. Amounts borrowed under the RBS Loan may be prepaid starting after the second anniversary of the note subject to prepayment fees of 5.0% of the principal balance on the date of prepayment. These prepayment fees are reduced by 1.0% a year for years three through seven of the loan. The term of the RBS Loan is for seven years, with monthly principal and interest payments commencing on February 1, 2011 and the balance due on January 1, 2018.

Among other things, under the RBS Loan, the Company must maintain compliance with specified financial covenants measured on a quarterly basis, including a minimum debt service coverage ratio, an average occupancy rate and a minimum project yield. The loan documents also include certain additional affirmative and negative covenants, including limitations on the disposition of the Borrowers and the collateral.

On November 6, 2009, the Company finalized the Fourth Amended and Restated Loan Agreement (Amended Term Loan) with General Electric Capital Corporation (GECC) which increased the borrowing capacity of the Amended Term Loan by $40,000, further referred to as the Six Project Loan. The Six Project Loan will mature on September 30, 2014 and is secured by, among other things, a perfected first priority mortgage/deed of trust on the fee simple interest in six of the Company’s skilled nursing facilities (the Property). The Amended Term Loan, which includes both the Ten Project Note (as described below) and the Six Project Loan, is cross collateralized and cross defaulted with the existing Second Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement (the Revolver). The interest rate on the loan is calculated at the current five year swap rate on the date of closing plus 585 basis points for half of the loan balance and the three year swap rate on the date of closing plus 585 basis points and thereafter floating at 90-day LIBOR plus 575 basis points, reset monthly and subject to a LIBOR floor of 2.0% for the remaining half of the loan balance. The Amended Term Loan did not modify any of the existing terms of the Ten Project Note.

On October 1, 2009, four subsidiaries of The Ensign Group, Inc. entered into four separate promissory notes with Johnson Land Enterprises, LLC, for an aggregate of $10,000, as a part of the Company’s acquisition of three skilled nursing facilities in Utah. The unpaid balance of principal and accrued interest from these notes is due on September 30, 2019. The notes bear interest at a rate of 6.0% per annum. As a part of this transaction, the Company recorded a discount to the debt balance in the form of imputed interest of $1,218. This amount will be amortized over the term of the promissory notes, or ten years.

In addition, on October 1, 2009, a subsidiary of The Ensign Group, Inc. in West Jordan, Utah assumed the obligation to pay the remaining principal and interest on bonds which were originally sold to finance the construction of the facility. These bonds were assumed as a part of the Company’s acquisition of three skilled nursing facilities in Utah. The unpaid balance of principal and accrued interest from these bonds is due on July 1, 2015. The bonds bear interest at an annual rate equal to sixty percent of the rate announced from time to time by Bank of America as its prime rate, which was 2.1% on March 31, 2011.

The Company has the Revolver with GECC under which the Company may borrow up to the lesser of $50,000 or 85% of the eligible accounts receivable. The Revolver will expire on February 21, 2013. At March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, there were no outstanding borrowings under the Revolver. As of March 31, 2011, the amount of borrowing capacity pledged to secure outstanding letters of credit and reserves against collateral for actual and contingent liabilities was $2,133 and $6,000, respectively. In addition, in the event of the Company’s default under the Amended Term Loan, GECC has the right to take control of the Company’s facilities encumbered by the loan to the extent necessary to make such payments and perform such acts that are required under the loan.

Table of Contents

THE ENSIGN GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Long-term debt consists of the following:



	March 31, 2011			December 31, 2010
Ten Project Note with GECC, multiple-advance term loan, principal and interest payable monthly; interest is fixed at time of draw at 10-year treasury note rate plus 2.25% (rates in effect at March 31, 2011 range from 6.95% to 7.50%), balance due June 2016, collateralized by deeds of trust on real property, assignments of rents, security agreements and fixture financing statements.	$	51,961		$	52,229
Six Project Loan with GECC, principal and interest payable monthly, interest defined above, balance due September 30, 2014, collateralized by deeds of trust on real property, assignments of rents, security agreements and fixture financing statements.	39,359			39,495
Promissory note with RBS, principal and interest payable monthly and continuing through January 2018, interest at a fixed rate of 6.04%, collateralized by real property, assignment of rents and Company guaranty.	34,849			35,000
Promissory notes, principal, and interest of $69 payable monthly and continuing through September 2019, interest at fixed rate of 6.0%, collateralized by deed of trust on real property, assignment of rents and security agreement.	9,662			9,724
Bond, principal and interest of $20 payable monthly and continuing through July 2015, interest at a fixed rate of 60% of the Prime Rate (as defined by the agreement).	988			1,038
Mortgage note, principal, and interest of $54 payable monthly and continuing through February 2027, interest at fixed rate of 7.5%, collateralized by deed of trust on real property, assignment of rents and security agreement.	6,037			6,086
	142,856			143,572
Less current maturities	(3,165		)	(3,055		)
Less debt discount	(1,035		)	(1,066		)
	$	138,656		$	139,451

The Company is subject to standard reporting requirements and other typical covenants for loans of these types. As of March 31, 2011, the Company was in compliance with such loan covenants.

The carrying value of the Company’s long-term debt is considered to approximate the fair value of such debt for all periods presented based upon the interest rates that the Company believes it can currently obtain for similar debt.

13. OPTIONS AND AWARDS

Stock-based compensation expense consists of share-based payment awards made to employees and directors, including employee stock options and restricted stock awards, based on estimated fair values. Stock-based compensation expense recognized in the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of income for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 does not include compensation expense for share-based payment awards granted prior to, but not yet vested as of, January 1, 2006, but does include compensation expense for the share-based payment awards granted on or subsequent to January 1, 2006 based on the grant date fair value. As stock-based compensation expense recognized in the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of income for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 was based on awards ultimately expected to vest, it has been reduced for estimated forfeitures. The Company estimates forfeitures at the time of grant and, if necessary, revises the estimate in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ.

The Company has three option plans, the 2001 Stock Option, Deferred Stock and Restricted Stock Plan (2001 Plan), the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan (2005 Plan) and the 2007 Omnibus Incentive Plan (2007 Plan), all of which have been approved by the stockholders. In the 2001 Plan and the 2005 Plan, options may be exercised for unvested shares of common stock, which have full stockholder rights including voting, dividend and liquidation rights. The Company retains the right to repurchase any or all unvested shares at the exercise price paid per share of any or all unvested shares should the optionee cease to remain in service while holding such unvested shares. The total number of shares available under all of the Company’s stock incentive plans was 1,639 as of March 31, 2011.

Table of Contents

THE ENSIGN GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

The Company uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to recognize the value of stock-based compensation expense for all share-based payment awards. Determining the appropriate fair-value model and calculating the fair value of stock-based awards at the grant date requires considerable judgment, including estimating stock price volatility, expected option life and forfeiture rates. The Company develops estimates based on historical data and market information, which can change significantly over time. The Company granted 9 options and 47 restricted stock awards during the three month period ended March 31, 2011.

The Company used the following assumptions for stock options granted during the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010:



			Weighted			Weighted		Weighted
		Options	Average Risk-			Average		Average
Grant Year	Plan	Granted	Free Rate		Expected Life	Volatility		Dividend Yield
2011	2007	9	2.53	%	6.5 years	55	%	0.93	%
2010	2007	106	2.82	%	6.5 years	55	%	1.08	%

For the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, the following represents the weighted average exercise price, grant date intrinsic value and fair value displayed at grant date for stock option grants:



		Weighted Average		Weighted Average
Grant Year	Granted	Exercise Price		Fair Value of Options
2011	9	$	24.36	$	12.42
2010	106	$	17.47	$	8.86

The weighted average exercise price equaled the weighted average fair value of common stock on the grant date for all options granted during the periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 and therefore, the intrinsic value was $0 at date of grant.

The following table represents the employee stock option activity during the three months ended March 31, 2011:



	Number of Options Outstanding		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Number of Options Vested	Weighted Average Exercise Price of Options Vested
January 1, 2011	1,904		$	11.55	921	$	9.07
Granted	9		24.36
Forfeited	(8	)	12.53
Exercised	(68	)	7.85
March 31, 2011	1,837		$	11.74	952	$	9.71

Table of Contents

THE ENSIGN GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

The following summary information reflects stock options outstanding, vested and related details as of March 31, 2011:



						Stock Options
	Stock Options Outstanding					Vested
		Number	Black-Scholes		Remaining Contractual Life	Vested and
Year of Grant	Exercise Price	Outstanding	Fair Value		(Years)	Exercisable
2003	0.67 – 0.81	4	*		2	4
2004	1.96 – 2.46	31	*		3	31
2005	4.99 – 5.75	142	*		4	142
2006	7.05 – 7.50	418	4,010		5	328
2008	9.38 – 14.87	641	3,450		7	310
2009	14.92 – 16.70	460	3,640		8	117
2010	17.47 – 18.16	132	1,173		9	20
2011	24.36	9	112		10	—
Total		1,837	$	12,385		952

* The Company will not recognize the Black-Scholes fair value for awards granted prior to January 1, 2006 unless such awards are modified.

In addition to the above, during the three month periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company granted 47 and 0 restricted stock awards, respectively. All awards were granted at an exercise price of $0 and vest over five years.

A summary of the status of the Company's nonvested restricted stock awards as of March 31, 2011, and changes during the three month periods ended March 31, 2011 is presented below:



	Nonvested Restricted Awards	Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Nonvested at January 1, 2011	102	$	18.05
Granted	47	24.36
Vested	—	—
Forfeited	—	—
Nonvested at March 31, 2011	149	$	20.04

Total share-based compensation expense recognized for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 was as follows:



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2011		2010
Share-based compensation expense related to stock options	$	644	$	649
Share-based compensation expense related to restricted stock awards	187		—
Total	$	831	$	649

In future periods, the Company expects to recognize approximately $5,496 and $2,747 in stock-based compensation expense for unvested options and unvested restricted stock awards, respectively, that were outstanding as of March 31, 2011. Future stock based compensation expense will be recognized over 2.9 and 4.5 weighted average years for unvested options and restricted stock awards, respectively. There were 885 unvested and outstanding options at March 31, 2011, of which 831 are expected to vest. The weighted average contractual life for options vested at March 31, 2011 was 6.8 years.

Table of Contents

THE ENSIGN GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

The aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding, vested, expected to vest and exercised as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 is as follows:



Options	March 31, 2011		December 31, 2010
Outstanding	$	37,087	$	25,366
Vested	21,159		14,545
Expected to vest	13,970		9,630
Exercised	1,628		1,955

The intrinsic value is calculated as the difference between the market value of the underlying common stock and the exercise price of the options.

14. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Leases — The Company leases certain facilities and its administrative offices under non-cancelable operating leases, most of which have initial lease terms ranging from five to 20 years. The Company also leases certain of its equipment under non-cancelable operating leases with initial terms ranging from three to five years. Most of these leases contain renewal options, certain of which involve rent increases. Total rent expense, inclusive of straight-line rent adjustments, was $3,731 and $3,670 for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Six of the Company’s facilities are operated under two separate three-facility master lease arrangements. Under these master leases, a breach at a single facility could subject one or more of the other facilities covered by the same master lease to the same default risk. Failure to comply with Medicare and Medicaid provider requirements is a default under several of the Company’s leases, master lease agreements and debt financing instruments. In addition, other potential defaults related to an individual facility may cause a default of an entire master lease portfolio and could trigger cross-default provisions in the Company’s outstanding debt arrangements and other leases. With an indivisible lease, it is difficult to restructure the composition of the portfolio or economic terms of the lease without the consent of the landlord.

In addition, a number of the Company’s individual facility leases are held by the same or related landlords, and some of these leases include cross-default provisions that could cause a default at one facility to trigger a technical default with respect to others, potentially subjecting certain leases and facilities to the various remedies available to the landlords under separate but cross-defaulted leases. The Company is not aware of any defaults as of March 31, 2011.

Regulatory Matters — Laws and regulations governing Medicare and Medicaid programs are complex and subject to interpretation. Compliance with such laws and regulations can be subject to future governmental review and interpretation, as well as significant regulatory action including fines, penalties, and exclusion from certain governmental programs. The Company believes that it is in compliance in all material respects with all applicable laws and regulations.

A significant portion of the Company’s revenue is derived from Medicaid and Medicare, for which reimbursement rates are subject to regulatory changes and government funding restrictions. Although the Company is not aware of any significant future rate changes, significant changes to the reimbursement rates could have a material effect on the Company’s operations.

Cost-Containment Measures — Both government and private pay sources have instituted cost-containment measures designed to limit payments made to providers of healthcare services, and there can be no assurance that future measures designed to limit payments made to providers will not adversely affect the Company.

Indemnities — From time to time, the Company enters into certain types of contracts that contingently require the Company to indemnify parties against third-party claims. These contracts primarily include (i) certain real estate leases, under which the Company may be required to indemnify property owners or prior facility operators for post-transfer environmental or other liabilities and other claims arising from the Company’s use of the applicable premises, (ii) operations transfer agreements, in which the Company agrees to indemnify past operators of facilities the Company acquires against certain liabilities arising from the transfer of the operation and/or the operation thereof after the transfer, (iii) certain lending agreements, under which the Company may be required to indemnify the lender against various claims and liabilities, (iv) agreements with certain lenders under which the Company may be required to indemnify such lenders against various claims and liabilities, and (v) certain agreements with the Company’s officers, directors and employees, under which the Company may be required to indemnify such persons for liabilities arising out of their employment relationships. The terms of such obligations vary by contract and, in most instances, a specific or maximum dollar amount is not explicitly stated therein. Generally, amounts under

Table of Contents

THE ENSIGN GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

these contracts cannot be reasonably estimated until a specific claim is asserted. Consequently, because no claims have been asserted, no liabilities have been recorded for these obligations on the Company’s balance sheets for any of the periods presented.

Litigation — The skilled nursing business involves a significant risk of liability given the age and health of the Company’s patients and residents and the services the Company provides. The Company and others in the industry are subject to an increasing number of claims and lawsuits, including professional liability claims, alleging that services have resulted in personal injury, elder abuse, wrongful death or other related claims. The defense of these lawsuits may result in significant legal costs, regardless of the outcome, and can result in large settlement amounts or damage awards.

In addition to the potential lawsuits and claims described above, the Company is also subject to potential lawsuits under the Federal False Claims Act and comparable state laws alleging submission of fraudulent claims for services to any healthcare program (such as Medicare) or payor. A violation may provide the basis for exclusion from federally-funded healthcare programs. Such exclusions could have a correlative negative impact on the Company’s financial performance. Some states, including California, Arizona and Texas, have enacted similar whistleblower and false claims laws and regulations. In addition, the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 created incentives for states to enact anti-fraud legislation modeled on the Federal False Claims Act. As such, the Company could face increased scrutiny, potential liability and legal expenses and costs based on claims under state false claims acts in markets in which it does business.

In May 2009, Congress passed the Fraud Enforcement and Recovery Act (FERA) of 2009 which made significant changes to the Federal False Claims Act (FCA), expanding the types of activities subject to prosecution and whistleblower liability. Following changes by FERA, health care providers face significant penalties for the knowing retention of government overpayments, even if no false claim was involved. Health care providers can now be liable for knowingly and improperly avoiding or decreasing an obligation to pay money or property to the government. This includes the retention of any government overpayment. The government can argue, therefore, that a FCA violation can occur without any affirmative fraudulent action or statement, as long as it is knowingly improper. In addition, FERA extended protections against retaliation for whistleblowers, including protections not only for employees, but also contractors and agents. Thus, there is generally no need for an employment relationship in order to qualify for protection against retaliation for whistleblowing.

In July 2010, Congress passed the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act). The Dodd-Frank Act establishes rigorous standards and supervision to protect the economy and American consumers, investors and businesses. Included under Section 922 of the Dodd-Frank Act, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) will be required to pay a reward to individuals who provide original information to the SEC resulting in monetary sanctions exceeding $1,000 in civil or criminal proceedings. The award will range from 10 to 30 percent of the amount recouped and the amount of the award shall be at the discretion of the SEC. The purpose of this reward program is to “motivate those with inside knowledge to come forward and assist the Government to identify and prosecute persons who have violated securities laws and recover money for victims of financial fraud.”

The State of California has established minimum staffing requirements for facilities operating in the state. Failure to meet these requirements can, among other things, jeopardize a facility’s compliance with the conditions of participation as established under relevant state and federal healthcare programs; it may also subject the facility to a notice of deficiency, a citation, civil money penalty, or the possibility of litigation.

For example, a class action suit was previously filed against us in the State of California, alleging, among other things, violations of certain Health and Safety Code provisions and a violation of the Consumer Legal Remedies Act at certain of the Company’s California facilities. In 2007, the Company settled this class action suit and the settlement was approved by the affected class and the Court. The Company has been, and continues to be, subject to similar claims and legal actions, which could possibly result in large damage awards and settlements. In the wake of the substantial judgment awarded to a group of plaintiffs in a recent case against one of the Company’s competitors, the Company expects that plaintiff’s attorneys will become increasingly more aggressive in their pursuit of claims alleging non-compliance with such minimum staffing requirements. The Company does not believe that the ultimate resolution of any known such action will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition or results of operations. However, if there were a significant increase in the number of these claims or an increase in amounts owing should plaintiffs be successful in their prosecution of these claims, this could materially adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

The Company has been, and continues to be, subject to claims and legal actions that arise in the ordinary course of business, including potential claims related to care and treatment provided at its facilities as well as employment related claims. The Company does not believe that the ultimate resolution of these actions will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition or results of operations. A significant increase in the number of these claims or an

Table of Contents

THE ENSIGN GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

increase in amounts owing should plaintiffs be successful in their prosecution of these claims, could materially adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Medicare Revenue Recoupments — The Company is subject to reviews relating to Medicare services, billings and potential overpayments. The Company had one operation subject to probe review during the three months ended March 31, 2011. The Company anticipates that these probe reviews will increase in frequency in the future. Further, the Company currently has no facilities on prepayment review; however, others may be placed on prepayment review in the future. If a facility fails prepayment review, the facility could then be subject to undergo targeted review, which is a review that targets perceived claims deficiencies. The Company has no facilities that are currently undergoing targeted review.

Other Matters — In March 2007, the Company and certain of its officers received a series of notices from its bank indicating that the United States Attorney for the Central District of California had issued an authorized investigative demand, a request for records similar to a subpoena, to the Company’s bank. The U.S. Attorney subsequently rescinded that demand. The rescinded demand requested documents from the Company’s bank related to financial transactions involving the Company, ten of its operating subsidiaries, an outside investor group, and certain of the Company’s current and former officers. Subsequently, in June 2007, the U.S. Attorney sent a letter to one of the Company’s current employees requesting a meeting. The letter indicated that the U.S. Attorney and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General were conducting an investigation of claims submitted to the Medicare program for rehabilitation services provided at unspecified facilities. Although both the Company and the employee offered to cooperate, the U.S. Attorney later withdrew its meeting request.

On December 17, 2007, the Company was informed by Deloitte & Touche LLP, its independent registered public accounting firm, that the U.S. Attorney served a grand jury subpoena on Deloitte & Touche LLP, relating to The Ensign Group, Inc., and several of its operating subsidiaries. The subpoena confirmed the Company’s previously reported belief that the U.S. Attorney was conducting an investigation involving facilities operated by certain of the Company’s operating subsidiaries. All together, the March 2007 authorized investigative demand and the December 2007 subpoena specifically covered information from a total of 18 of the Company’s 86 facilities. In February 2008, the U.S. Attorney contacted two additional current employees. Based on these events, the Company believes that the U.S. Attorney may be conducting parallel criminal, civil and administrative investigations involving The Ensign Group, Inc. and one or more of its skilled nursing facilities.

Pursuant to these investigations, on December 17, 2008, representatives from the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) served search warrants on the Company’s Service Center and six of its Southern California skilled nursing facilities. Following the execution of the warrants on the six facilities, a subpoena was issued covering eight additional facilities. Among other things, the warrants covered specific patient records at the six facilities. On May 4, 2009, the U.S. Attorney served a second subpoena requesting additional patient records on the same patients who were covered by the original warrants. The Company has worked with the U.S. Attorney’s office to produce information responsive to both subpoenas. The Company and its regulatory counsel continue to actively work with the U.S. Attorney’s office and respond to requests for information as they are received relative to the investigation.

The Company is cooperating with the U.S. Attorney’s office and intends to continue working with them to the extent they will allow the Company to help move their inquiry forward. To the Company’s knowledge, however, neither The Ensign Group, Inc. nor any of its operating subsidiaries or employees has been formally charged with any wrongdoing. The Company cannot predict or provide any assurance as to the possible outcome of the investigation or any possible related proceedings, or as to the possible outcome of any qui tam litigation that may follow, nor can the Company estimate the possible loss or range of loss that may result from any such proceedings and, therefore, the Company has not recorded any related accruals. To the extent the U.S. Attorney’s office elects to pursue this matter, or if the investigation has been instigated by a qui tam relator who elects to pursue the matter, and the Company is subjected to or alleged to be liable for claims or obligations under federal Medicare statutes, the federal False Claims Act, or similar state and federal statutes and related regulations, the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected and its stock price could decline.

The Company initiated an internal investigation in November 2006 when it became aware of an allegation of possible reimbursement irregularities at one or more of the Company’s facilities. This investigation focused on 12 facilities, and included all six of the facilities which were covered by the warrants served in December 2008. The Company retained outside counsel to assist in looking into these matters. The Company and its outside counsel concluded this investigation in February 2008 without identifying any systemic or patterns and practices of fraudulent or intentional misconduct. The Company made observations at certain facilities regarding areas of potential improvement in some of its recordkeeping and billing practices and has implemented measures, some of which were already underway before the investigation began, that the Company believes will strengthen its recordkeeping and billing processes. None of these additional findings or observations appears to be rooted in fraudulent or intentional misconduct. The Company continues to evaluate the measures it has

Table of Contents

THE ENSIGN GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

implemented for effectiveness, and is continuing to seek ways to improve these processes.

As a byproduct of its investigation, the Company identified a limited number of selected Medicare claims for which adequate backup documentation could not be located or for which other billing deficiencies existed. The Company, with the assistance of independent consultants experienced in Medicare billing, completed a billing review on these claims. To the extent missing documentation was not located, the Company treated the claims as overpayments. Consistent with healthcare industry accounting practices, the Company records any charge for refunded payments against revenue in the period in which the claim adjustment becomes known.

In September 2010, the board of directors appointed a special committee consisting solely of independent directors to address the pending investigation by the Department of Justice (DOJ). Consistent with its mandate to attempt to expedite resolution of the investigation, the special committee has retained independent counsel and third party consultants to facilitate its work. The special committee and its consultants are actively pursuing that objective by, among other things, conducting a targeted review and analysis of selected historical medical and billing records, in an effort to understand any concerns potentially at issue in the DOJ investigation. The special committee's work is ongoing, and we expect that it will continue until its mandate is fulfilled.

Concentrations

Credit Risk — The Company has significant accounts receivable balances, the collectability of which is dependent on the availability of funds from certain governmental programs, primarily Medicare and Medicaid. These receivables represent the only significant concentration of credit risk for the Company. The Company does not believe there are significant credit risks associated with these governmental programs. The Company believes that an appropriate allowance has been recorded for the possibility of these receivables proving uncollectible, and continually monitors and adjusts these allowances as necessary. The Company’s receivables from Medicare and Medicaid payor programs accounted for approximately 56% and 55% of its total accounts receivable as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. Revenue from reimbursements under the Medicare and Medicaid programs accounted for approximately 76% of the Company’s revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010.

Cash in Excess of FDIC Limits — The Company currently has bank deposits with financial institutions in the U.S. that exceed FDIC insurance limits. FDIC insurance provides protection for bank deposits up to $250. In addition, the Company has uninsured bank deposits with a financial institution outside the U.S. As of the date of this filing, the Company had approximately $2,400 in uninsured cash deposits. All uninsured bank deposits are held at high quality credit institutions.

Table of Contents

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

You should read the following discussion and analysis in conjunction with our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto contained in Part I, Item 1 of this Report. The information contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q is not a complete description of our business or the risks associated with an investment in our common stock. We urge you to carefully review and consider the various disclosures made by us in this Report and in our other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), including our Annual Report on Form 10-K (Annual Report), which discusses our business and related risks in greater detail, as well as subsequent reports we may file from time to time on Forms 10-Q and 8-K, for additional information. The section entitled “Risk Factors” contained in Part II, Item 1A of this Report, and similar discussions in our other SEC filings, also describe some of the important risk factors that may affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and/or liquidity. You should carefully consider those risks, in addition to the other information in this Report and in our other filings with the SEC, before deciding to purchase, hold or sell our common stock.

This Report contains forward-looking statements, which include, but are not limited to the Company’s expected future financial position, results of operations, cash flows, financing plans, business strategy, budgets, capital expenditures, competitive positions, growth opportunities and plans and objectives of management. Forward-looking statements can often be identified by words such as “anticipates,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “predicts,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “would,” “could,” “potential,” “continue,” “ongoing,” similar expressions, and variations or negatives of these words. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Therefore, our actual results could differ materially and adversely from those expressed in any forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, some of which are listed under the section “Risk Factors” contained in Part II, Item 1A of this Report. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this Report, and are based on our current expectations, estimates and projections about our industry and business, management’s beliefs, and certain assumptions made by us, all of which are subject to change. We undertake no obligation to revise or update publicly any forward-looking statement for any reason, except as otherwise required by law. As used in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, the words, “we,” “our” and “us” refer to The Ensign Group, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries. All of our facilities, the Service Center and the Captive are operated by separate, wholly-owned, independent subsidiaries that have their own management, employees and assets. The use of “we,” “us,” “our” and similar verbiage in this quarterly report is not meant to imply that any of our facilities, the Service Center or the Captive are operated by the same entity. This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes included in the Annual Report.

Overview

We are a provider of skilled nursing and rehabilitative care services through the operation of 86 facilities located in California, Arizona, Texas, Washington, Utah, Colorado and Idaho and one home health and hospice operation located in Idaho as of March 31, 2011. All of these facilities are skilled nursing facilities, other than five stand-alone assisted living facilities in California, Arizona, Texas and Colorado and seven campuses that offer both skilled nursing and assisted living services in California, Texas, Arizona and Utah. Our facilities provide a broad spectrum of skilled nursing and assisted living services, physical, occupational and speech therapies, and other rehabilitative and healthcare services, for both long-term residents and short-stay rehabilitation patients. We encourage and empower our facility leaders and staff to make their facility the “facility of choice” in the community it serves. This means that our facility leaders and staff are generally free to discern and address the unique needs and priorities of healthcare professionals, customers and other stakeholders in the local community or market, and then work to create a superior service offering and reputation for that particular community or market to encourage prospective customers and referral sources to choose or recommend the facility. As of March 31, 2011, we owned 57 of our 86 facilities and operated an additional 29 facilities under long-term lease arrangements, and had options to purchase 8 of those 29 facilities. The following table summarizes our facilities and operational skilled nursing, assisted living and independent living beds by ownership status as of March 31, 2011:



	Owned		Leased (with a Purchase Option)		Leased (without a Purchase Option)		Total
Number of facilities	57		8		21		86
Percent of total	66.3	%	9.3	%	24.4	%	100	%
Operational skilled nursing, assisted living and independent living beds	6,918		957		2,439		10,314
Percent of total	67.1	%	9.3	%	23.6	%	100	%

Table of Contents

The Ensign Group, Inc. is a holding company with no direct operating assets, employees or revenues. All of our facilities are operated by separate, wholly-owned, independent subsidiaries, which have their own management, employees and assets. In addition, one of our wholly-owned independent subsidiaries, which we call our Service Center, provides centralized accounting, payroll, human resources, information technology, legal, risk management and other services to each operating subsidiary through contractual relationships between such subsidiaries. In addition, we have the Captive that provides some claims-made coverage to our operating subsidiaries for general and professional liability, as well as for certain workers’ compensation insurance liabilities. References herein to the consolidated “Company” and “its” assets and activities, as well as the use of the terms “we,” “us,” “our” and similar verbiage in this quarterly report is not meant to imply that The Ensign Group, Inc. has direct operating assets, employees or revenue, or that any of the facilities, the Service Center or the Captive are operated by the same entity.

Facility Acquisition History



	December 31,						March 31,
	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011
Cumulative number of facilities	46	57	61	63	77	82	86
Cumulative number of operational skilled nursing, assisted living and independent living beds	5,585	6,667	7,105	7,324	8,948	9,539	10,314

The following table sets forth the location of our facilities and the number of operational beds located at our facilities as of March 31, 2011:



	CA	AZ	TX	UT	CO	WA	ID	Total
Number of facilities	34	12	19	10	5	3	3	86
Operational skilled nursing, assisted living and independent living beds	3,821	1,830	2,360	1,316	463	278	246	10,314

On January 1, 2011, we purchased one skilled nursing facility which also offers assisted living and independent living services and one independent living facility in Texas for approximately $14.6 million which was paid in cash. This acquisition added 123 operational skilled nursing beds, 77 assisted living units, 72 independent living units and 20 independent living cottages to our operations. We also entered into a separate operations transfer agreement with the prior tenant as part of this transaction.

On February 1, 2011, we purchased one skilled nursing facility in Utah, which also offers assisted living and independent living services for approximately $16.6 million which was paid in cash. This acquisition added 233 operational skilled nursing beds, 48 assisted living units and 68 independent living apartments to our operations. We also entered into a separate operations transfer agreement with the prior tenant as part of this transaction.

On March 18, 2011, we purchased one assisted living facility in California for approximately $5.9 million, which was paid in cash. This acquisition added 125 assisted living units to our operations. We also entered into a separate operations transfer agreement with the prior tenant as part of this transaction.

In addition, we purchased the underlying assets of one of our skilled nursing facilities in Ventura, California as part of the March 18 transaction. The facility was purchased for approximately $7.3 million, which was paid in cash. This acquisition did not impact our operational skilled nursing bed count.

See further discussion of facility acquisitions in Note 6 in Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

Key Performance Indicators

We manage our skilled nursing business by monitoring key performance indicators that affect our financial performance. These indicators and their definitions include the following:

•

Routine revenue: Routine revenue is generated by the contracted daily rate charged for all contractually inclusive services. The inclusion of therapy and other ancillary treatments varies by payor source and by contract. Services provided outside of the routine contractual agreement are recorded separately as ancillary revenue, including Medicare Part B therapy services, and are not included in the routine revenue definition.

•

Skilled revenue: The amount of routine revenue generated from patients in our skilled nursing facilities who are receiving higher levels of care under Medicare, managed care, Medicaid, or other skilled reimbursement programs. The other skilled residents that are included in this population represent very high acuity residents who are receiving high levels of nursing and ancillary services which are reimbursed by payors other than Medicare or managed care. Skilled revenue excludes any revenue generated from our assisted living services.

•

Skilled mix: The amount of our skilled revenue as a percentage of our total routine revenue. Skilled mix (in days) represents the number of days our Medicare, managed care, or other skilled patients are receiving services at our skilled nursing facilities divided by the total number of days patients (less days from assisted living services) from all payor sources are receiving services at our skilled nursing facilities for any given period (less days from assisted living services).

•

Quality mix: The amount of routine non-Medicaid revenue as a percentage of our total routine revenue. Quality mix (in days) represents the number of days our non-Medicaid patients are receiving services at our skilled nursing facilities divided by the total number of days patients from all payor sources are receiving services at our skilled nursing facilities for any given period (less days from assisted living services).


•	Average daily rates: The routine revenue by payor source for a period at our skilled nursing facilities divided by actual patient days for that revenue source for that given period.


•	Occupancy percentage (operational beds): The total number of residents occupying a bed in a skilled nursing, assisted living or independent living facility as a percentage of the beds in a facility which are available for occupancy during the measurement period.


•	Number of facilities and operational beds: The total number of skilled nursing, assisted living and independent living facilities that we own or operate and the total number of operational beds associated with these facilities.

Skilled and Quality Mix. Like most skilled nursing providers, we measure both patient days and revenue by payor. Medicare, managed care and other skilled patients, whom we refer to as high acuity patients, typically require a higher level of skilled nursing and rehabilitative care. Accordingly, Medicare and managed care reimbursement rates are typically higher than from other payors. In most states, Medicaid reimbursement rates are generally the lowest of all payor types. Changes in the payor mix can significantly affect our revenue and profitability.

The following table summarizes our overall skilled mix and quality mix for the periods indicated as a percentage of our total routine revenue (less revenue from assisted living services) and as a percentage of total patient days (less days from assisted living services):



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2011		2010
Skilled Mix:
Days	26.2	%	26.0	%
Revenue	52.8	%	49.8	%
Quality Mix:
Days	38.2	%	37.7	%
Revenue	61.1	%	58.4	%

Table of Contents

Occupancy. We define occupancy as the ratio of actual patient days (one patient day equals one resident occupying one bed for one day) during any measurement period to the number of beds in facilities which are available for occupancy during the measurement period. The number of licensed and independent living beds in a skilled nursing, assisted living or independent living facility that are actually operational and available for occupancy may be less than the total official licensed bed capacity. This sometimes occurs due to the permanent dedication of bed space to alternative purposes, such as enhanced therapy treatment space or other desirable uses calculated to improve service offerings and/or operational efficiencies in a facility. In some cases, three- and four-bed wards have been reduced to two-bed rooms for resident comfort, and larger wards have been reduced to conform to changes in Medicare requirements. These beds are seldom expected to be placed back into service. We define occupancy in operational beds as the ratio of actual patient days during any measurement period to the number of available patient days for that period. We believe that reporting occupancy based on operational beds is consistent with industry practices and provides a more useful measure of actual occupancy performance from period to period.

The following table summarizes our overall occupancy statistics for the periods indicated:



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2011		2010
Occupancy:
Operational beds at end of period	10,314		9,076
Available patient days	907,546		816,840
Actual patient days	731,485		649,084
Occupancy percentage (based on operational beds)	80.6	%	79.5	%

Revenue Sources

Our total revenue represents revenue derived primarily from providing services to patients and residents of skilled nursing facilities, and to a lesser extent from assisted living facilities and ancillary services. We receive service revenue from Medicaid, Medicare, private payors and other third-party payors, and managed care sources. The sources and amounts of our revenue are determined by a number of factors, including bed capacity and occupancy rates of our healthcare facilities, the mix of patients at our facilities and the rates of reimbursement among payors. Payment for ancillary services varies based upon the service provided and the type of payor. The following table sets forth our total revenue by payor source and as a percentage of total revenue for the periods indicated:



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2011				2010
	$		%		$		%
	(Dollars in thousands)
Revenue:
Medicaid	$	66,225	36.2	%	$	61,653	40.0	%
Medicare	67,643		37.0		51,122		33.2
Medicaid-skilled	4,411		2.4		4,418		2.8
Total	138,279		75.6		117,193		76.0
Managed Care	24,141		13.2		20,569		13.4
Private and Other(1)	20,523		11.2		16,412		10.6
Total revenue	$	182,943	100.0	%	$	154,174	100.0	%

_______________________


(1)	Includes revenue from assisted living facilities and home health and hospice operations.

Table of Contents

Critical Accounting Policies Update

There have been no significant changes during the three month period ended March 31, 2011 to the items that we disclosed as our critical accounting policies and estimates in our discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC.

Industry Trends

The skilled nursing industry has evolved to meet the growing demand for post-acute and custodial healthcare services generated by an aging population, increasing life expectancies and the trend toward shifting of patient care to lower cost settings. The skilled nursing industry has evolved in recent years, which we believe has led to a number of favorable improvements in the industry, as described below:

•

Shift of Patient Care to Lower Cost Alternatives. The growth of the senior population in the United States continues to increase healthcare costs, often faster than the available funding from government-sponsored healthcare programs. In response, federal and state governments have adopted cost-containment measures that encourage the treatment of patients in more cost-effective settings such as skilled nursing facilities, for which the staffing requirements and associated costs are often significantly lower than acute care hospitals, inpatient rehabilitation facilities and other post-acute care settings. As a result, skilled nursing facilities are generally serving a larger population of higher-acuity patients than in the past.


•	Significant Acquisition and Consolidation Opportunities. The skilled nursing industry is large and highly fragmented, characterized predominantly by numerous local and regional providers. We believe this fragmentation provides significant acquisition and consolidation opportunities for us.


•	Improving Supply and Demand Balance. The number of skilled nursing facilities has declined modestly over the past several years. We expect that the supply and demand balance in the skilled nursing industry will continue to improve due to the shift of patient care to lower cost settings, an aging population and increasing life expectancies.

•

Increased Demand Driven by Aging Populations and Increased Life Expectancy. As life expectancy continues to increase in the United States and seniors account for a higher percentage of the total U.S. population, we believe the overall demand for skilled nursing services will increase. At present, the primary market demographic for skilled nursing services is primarily individuals age 75 and older. According to U.S. Census Bureau Interim Projections, there will be 46 million people in the United States in 2010 that are over 65 years old. The U.S. Census Bureau estimates this group is one of the fastest growing segments of the United States population and is expected to more than double between 2000 and 2030.

We believe the skilled nursing industry has been and will continue to be impacted by several other trends. The use of long-term care insurance is increasing among seniors as a means of planning for the costs of skilled nursing services. In addition, as a result of increased mobility in society, reduction of average family size, and the increased number of two-wage earner couples, more seniors are looking for alternatives outside the family for their care.

Effects of Changing Prices. Medicare reimbursement rates and procedures are subject to change from time to time, which could materially impact our revenue. Medicare reimburses our skilled nursing facilities under a prospective payment system (PPS) for certain inpatient covered services. Under the PPS, facilities are paid a predetermined amount per patient, per day, based on the anticipated costs of treating patients. The amount to be paid is determined by classifying each patient into a resource utilization group (RUG) category that is based upon each patient’s acuity level. As of October 1, 2010, the RUG categories were expanded from 53 to 66 with the introduction of minimum data set (MDS) 3.0. Should future changes in skilled nursing facility payments reduce rates or increase the standards for reaching certain reimbursement levels, our Medicare revenues could be reduced, with a corresponding adverse impact on our financial condition or results of operation.

The Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 (DRA) added Sec. 1833(g)(5) of the Social Security Act and directed the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to develop a process that allows exceptions for Medicare beneficiaries to therapy caps when continued therapy is deemed medically necessary. The therapy cap exception was reauthorized in a number of subsequent laws, most recently as part of the Medicare and Medicaid Extenders Act of 2010, which extends the exceptions process through December 31, 2011. The application of annual caps, or the discontinuation of exceptions to the annual caps, could have an adverse effect on our rehabilitation therapy revenue. Additionally, the exceptions to these caps may not be extended beyond December 31, 2011, which could also have an adverse effect on our revenue after that date.

Table of Contents

CMS issued a proposed rule on April 28, 2011 regarding Medicare payment rates for skilled nursing facilities for fiscal year 2012. The proposed rule discussed two options for updating payment rates for skilled nursing facilities under PPS. Option one would address potential overpayments related to the transition to the new RUGs IV system and impose a negative adjustment to RUGs IV therapy rates, and a net market basket increase of 1.5% consisting of a 2.7% market basket inflation increase, less a 1.2% adjustment to account for the effect of a productivity adjustment, beginning on October 1, 2011. CMS has projected the impact of these proposed changes would result in an 11.3% decrease in payments to skilled nursing centers. Under option two, skilled nursing centers would receive the net 1.5% market basket payment update effective October 1, 2011 while CMS continues to collect more data regarding the RUGs IV system that was implemented on October 1, 2010. The proposed rule would also make changes to the way that group therapy services are paid under the RUGs IV system. The public comment period for the above proposal will remain open until June 27, 2011 and no final rule is expected until after then.

Federal Health Care Reform. On March 23, 2010, President Obama signed into law the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), which contained several sweeping changes to America’s health insurance system. Among other reforms contained in PPACA, many Medicare providers received reductions in their market basket updates. Unlike for some other Medicare providers, PPACA makes no reduction to the market basket update for skilled nursing facilities in fiscal years 2010 or 2011. However, under PPACA, the skilled nursing facility market basket update will be subject to a full productivity adjustment beginning in fiscal year 2012. In addition, PPACA enacted several reforms with respect to skilled nursing facilities and hospice organizations, including payment measures to realize significant savings of federal and state funds by deterring and prosecuting fraud and abuse in both the Medicare and Medicaid programs. While many of the provisions of PPACA will not take effect for several years or are subject to further refinement through the promulgation of regulations, some key provisions of PPACA are effective immediately or within six to twelve months of PPACA’s enactment date.


•	Enhanced CMPs and Escrow Provisions — Effective March 23, 2010, PPACA includes expanded civil monetary penalty (CMP) provisions applicable to all Medicare and Medicaid providers. PPACA provides for the imposition of CMPs of up to $50,000 and, in some cases, treble damages, for actions relating to alleged false statements to the federal government.

•

Nursing Home Transparency Requirements — In addition to expanded CMP provisions, PPACA imposes substantial new transparency requirements for Medicare-participating nursing facilities. Existing law requires Medicare providers to disclose to CMS: (1) any person or entity that owns directly or indirectly an ownership interest of five percent or more in a provider; (2) officers and directors (if a corporation) and partners (if a partnership); and (3) holders of a mortgage, deed of trust, note or other obligation secured by the entity or the property of the entity. PPACA expands the information required to be disclosed to include: (4) the facility’s organizational structure; (5) additional information on officers, directors, trustees, and “managing employees” of the facility (including their names, titles, and start dates of services); and (6) information on any “additional disclosable party” of the facility. CMS has not yet promulgated regulations to implement these provisions.

•

Suspension of Payments During Pending Fraud Investigations — PPACA also provides the federal government with expanded authority to suspend payment if a provider is investigated for allegations or issues of fraud. Section 6402 of the PPACA provides that Medicare and Medicaid payments may be suspended pending a “credible investigation of fraud,” unless the Secretary of Health and Human Services determines that good cause exists not to suspend payments. “Credible investigation of fraud” is undefined, although the Secretary must consult with the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) in determining whether a credible investigation of fraud exists. This suspension authority creates a new mechanism for the federal government to suspend both Medicare and Medicaid payments for allegations of fraud, independent of whether a state exercises its authority to suspend Medicaid payments pending a fraud investigation. To the extent the Secretary applies this suspension of payments provision to one or more of our facilities for allegations of fraud, such a suspension could adversely affect our results of operations. OIG promulgated regulations making these provisions effective as of March 25, 2011.

•

Overpayment Reporting and Repayment; Expanded False Claims Act Liability — PPACA also enacted several important changes that expand potential liability under the federal False Claims Act. Effective March 23, 2010, PPACA provides that overpayments related to services provided to both Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries must be reported and returned to the applicable payor within the later of sixty days of identification of the overpayment, or the date the corresponding cost report (if applicable) is due. Any overpayment retained after the deadline is considered an “obligation” for purposes of the federal False Claims Act.

•

Voluntary Pilot Program — Bundled Payments — To support the policies of making all providers responsible during an episode of care and rewarding value over volume, HHS will establish, test and evaluate alternative payment methodologies for Medicare services through a five-year, national, voluntary pilot program starting in 2013. This program will provide incentives for providers to coordinate patient care across the continuum and to be jointly accountable for an entire episode of care centered around a hospitalization. HHS will develop qualifying provider

Table of Contents

payment methods that may include bundled payments and bids from entities for episodes of care that begins three days prior to hospitalization and spans 30 days following discharge. The bundled payment will cover the costs of acute care inpatient services; physicians’ services delivered in and outside of an acute care hospital; outpatient hospital services including emergency department services; post-acute care services, including home health services, skilled nursing services, inpatient rehabilitation services; and inpatient hospital services. The payment methodology will include payment for services, such as care coordination, medication reconciliation, discharge planning and transitional care services, and other patient-centered activities. Payments for items and services cannot result in spending more than would otherwise be expended for such entities if the pilot program were not implemented. As with Medicare’s shared savings program discussed above, payment arrangements among providers on the backside of the bundled payment must take into account significant hurdles under the Anti-kickback Law, the Stark Law and the Civil Monetary Penalties Law. This pilot program may expand in 2016 if expansion would reduce Medicare spending without also reducing quality of care.

The provisions of PPACA discussed above are examples of recently-enacted federal health reform provisions that we believe may have a material impact on the long-term care industry and on our business. However, the foregoing discussion is not intended to constitute, nor does it constitute, an exhaustive review and discussion of PPACA. It is possible that these and other provisions of PPACA may be interpreted, clarified, or applied to our facilities or operations in a way that could have a material adverse impact on the results of operations.

Historically, adjustments to reimbursement under Medicare have had a significant effect on our revenue. For a discussion of historic adjustments and recent changes to the Medicare program and related reimbursement rates see Risk Factors — Risks Related to Our Business and Industry — “Our revenue could be impacted by federal and state changes to reimbursement and other aspects of Medicaid and Medicare,” “Our future revenue, financial condition and results of operations could be impacted by continued cost containment pressures on Medicaid spending,” “We may not be fully reimbursed for all services for which each facility bills through consolidated billing, which could adversely affect our revenue, financial condition and results of operations” and “Reforms to the U.S. healthcare system will impose new requirements upon us and may lower our reimbursements.“The federal government and state governments continue to focus on efforts to curb spending on healthcare programs such as Medicare and Medicaid. We are not able to predict the outcome of the legislative process. We also cannot predict the extent to which proposals will be adopted or, if adopted and implemented, what effect, if any, such proposals and existing new legislation will have on us. Efforts to impose reduced allowances, greater discounts and more stringent cost controls by government and other payors are expected to continue and could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Table of Contents

Results of Operations

The following table sets forth details of our revenue, expenses and earnings as a percentage of total revenue for the periods indicated:



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2011		2010
Revenue	100.0	%	100.0	%
Expenses:
Cost of services (exclusive of facility rent and depreciation and amortization shown separately below)	78.2		79.9
Facility rent—cost of services	2.0		2.3
General and administrative expense	4.0		3.7
Depreciation and amortization	2.8		2.6
Total expenses	87.0		88.5
Income from operations	13.0		11.5
Other income (expense):
Interest expense	(1.5	)	(1.5	)
Interest income	—		0.1
Other expense, net	(1.5	)	(1.4	)
Income before provision for income taxes	11.5		10.1
Provision for income taxes	4.5		4.0
Net income	7.0	%	6.1	%

The table below reconciles net income to EBITDA and EBITDAR for the periods presented:



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2011		2010
	(Dollars in thousands)
Consolidated Statement of Income Data:
Net income	$	12,746	$	9,348
Interest expense, net	2,672		2,213
Provision for income taxes	8,294		6,126
Depreciation and amortization	5,059		3,955
EBITDA(1)	$	28,771	$	21,642
Facility rent—cost of services	3,616		3,575
EBITDAR(1)	$	32,387	$	25,217

_______________________

(1)

EBITDA and EBITDAR are supplemental non-GAAP financial measures. Regulation G, Conditions for Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures, and other provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, define and prescribe the conditions for use of certain non-GAAP financial information. We calculate EBITDA as net income before (a) interest expense, net, (b) provision for income taxes, and (c) depreciation and amortization. We calculate EBITDAR by adjusting EBITDA to exclude facility rent—cost of services. These non-GAAP financial measures are used in addition to and in conjunction with results presented in accordance with GAAP. These non-GAAP financial measures should not be relied upon to the exclusion of GAAP financial measures. These non-GAAP financial measures reflect an additional way of viewing aspects of our operations that, when viewed with our GAAP results and the accompanying reconciliations to corresponding GAAP financial measures, provide a more complete understanding of factors and trends affecting our business.

Table of Contents

We believe EBITDA and EBITDAR are useful to investors and other external users of our financial statements in evaluating our operating performance because:

•

they are widely used by investors and analysts in our industry as a supplemental measure to evaluate the overall operating performance of companies in our industry without regard to items such as interest expense, net and depreciation and amortization, which can vary substantially from company to company depending on the book value of assets, capital structure and the method by which assets were acquired; and


•	they help investors evaluate and compare the results of our operations from period to period by removing the impact of our capital structure and asset base from our operating results.

We use EBITDA and EBITDAR:


•	as measurements of our operating performance to assist us in comparing our operating performance on a consistent basis;


•	to allocate resources to enhance the financial performance of our business;


•	to evaluate the effectiveness of our operational strategies; and


•	to compare our operating performance to that of our competitors.

We typically use EBITDA and EBITDAR to compare the operating performance of each skilled nursing and assisted living facility. EBITDA and EBITDAR are useful in this regard because they do not include such costs as net interest expense, income taxes, depreciation and amortization expense, and, with respect to EBITDAR, facility rent — cost of services, which may vary from period-to-period depending upon various factors, including the method used to finance facilities, the amount of debt that we have incurred, whether a facility is owned or leased, the date of acquisition of a facility or business, or the tax law of the state in which a business unit operates. As a result, we believe that the use of EBITDA and EBITDAR provide a meaningful and consistent comparison of our business between periods by eliminating certain items required by GAAP.

We also establish compensation programs and bonuses for our facility level employees that are partially based upon the achievement of EBITDAR targets.

Despite the importance of these measures in analyzing our underlying business, designing incentive compensation and for our goal setting, EBITDA and EBITDAR are non-GAAP financial measures that have no standardized meaning defined by GAAP. Therefore, our EBITDA and EBITDAR measures have limitations as analytical tools, and they should not be considered in isolation, or as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported in accordance with GAAP. Some of these limitations are:


•	they do not reflect our current or future cash requirements for capital expenditures or contractual commitments;


•	they do not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our working capital needs;


•	they do not reflect the net interest expense, or the cash requirements necessary to service interest or principal payments, on our debt;


•	they do not reflect any income tax payments we may be required to make;


•	although depreciation and amortization are non-cash charges, the assets being depreciated and amortized will often have to be replaced in the future, and EBITDA and EBITDAR do not reflect any cash requirements for such replacements; and


•	other companies in our industry may calculate these measures differently than we do, which may limit their usefulness as comparative measures.

We compensate for these limitations by using them only to supplement net income on a basis prepared in accordance with GAAP in order to provide a more complete understanding of the factors and trends affecting our business.

Management strongly encourages investors to review our condensed consolidated financial statements in their entirety and to not rely on any single financial measure. Because these non-GAAP financial measures are not standardized, it may not be possible to compare these financial measures with other companies’ non-GAAP financial measures having the same or similar names. For information about our financial results as reported in accordance with GAAP, see our condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this document.

Table of Contents

Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 Compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2010



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2011			2010
	(Dollars in thousands)						Change		% Change
Total Facility Results:
Revenue	$	182,943		$	154,174		$	28,769	18.7	%
Number of facilities at period end	86			79			7		8.9	%
Actual patient days	731,485			649,084			82,401		12.7	%
Occupancy percentage — Operational beds	80.6		%	79.5		%			1.1	%
Skilled mix by nursing days	26.2		%	26.0		%			0.2	%
Skilled mix by nursing revenue	52.8		%	49.8		%			3.0	%



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2011			2010
	(Dollars in thousands)						Change		% Change
Same Facility Results(1):
Revenue	$	140,219		$	126,864		$	13,355	10.5	%
Number of facilities at period end	60			60			—		—	%
Actual patient days	521,775			514,298			7,477		1.5	%
Occupancy percentage — Operational beds	83.6		%	82.2		%			1.4	%
Skilled mix by nursing days	29.6		%	28.8		%			0.8	%
Skilled mix by nursing revenue	56.7		%	53.4		%			3.3	%



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2011			2010
	(Dollars in thousands)						Change		% Change
Transitioning Facility Results(2):
Revenue	$	27,390		$	24,504		$	2,886	11.8	%
Number of facilities at period end	17			17			—		—	%
Actual patient days	128,183			123,910			4,273		3.4	%
Occupancy percentage — Operational beds	72.5		%	70.1		%			2.4	%
Skilled mix by nursing days	16.4		%	14.6		%			1.8	%
Skilled mix by nursing revenue	37.9		%	32.0		%			5.9	%



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2011			2010
	(Dollars in thousands)						Change		% Change
Recently Acquired Facility Results(3):
Revenue	$	15,334		$	2,806		$	12,528	NM
Number of facilities at period end	9			2			7		NM
Actual patient days	81,527			10,876			70,651		NM
Occupancy percentage — Operational beds	76.2		%	76.5		%			NM
Skilled mix by nursing days	15.6		%	22.3		%			NM
Skilled mix by nursing revenue	37.0		%	35.7		%			NM

_______________________


(1)	Same Facility results represent all facilities purchased prior to January 1, 2008.


(2)	Transitioning Facility results represents all facilities purchased from January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2009.


(3)	Recently Acquired Facility (or “Acquisitions”) results represent all facilities purchased on or subsequent to January 1, 2010.

Table of Contents

Revenue. Revenue increased $28.7 million, or 18.7%, to $182.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to $154.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010. Of the $28.7 million increase, Medicare and managed care revenue increased $19.6 million, or 27.2%, Medicaid revenue increased $4.6 million, or 7.4% and private and other revenue increased $4.6 million, or 28.7%. Approximately $12.5 million of the total revenue increase was due to revenue generated by Recently Acquired Facilities. Since January 1, 2010, the Company has acquired eight facilities and one home health and hospice operation in five states.

Revenue generated by Same Facilities increased $13.4 million, or 10.5%, for the three months ended March 31, 2011 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2010. This increase was primarily due to an increase in occupancy of 1.4% to 83.6% and skilled mix of 0.8%, to 29.6%, which was the result of higher acuity levels and rate increases.

The following table reflects the change in the skilled nursing average daily revenue rates by payor source, excluding services that are not covered by the daily rate:



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	Same Facility				Transitioning				Acquisitions				Total				%
	2011		2010		2011		2010		2011		2010		2011		2010		Change
Skilled Nursing Average Daily Revenue Rates:
Medicare	$	639.85	$	550.94	$	519.35	$	443.60	$	506.65	$	371.17	$	615.32	$	531.84	15.7	%
Managed care	365.00		340.44		441.04		413.32		434.10		370.50		372.51		344.75		8.1	%
Other skilled	534.66		551.01		458.51		—		573.88		624.41		533.65		553.44		(3.6	)%
Total skilled revenue	528.30		468.05		496.11		437.73		503.07		399.23		523.61		463.78		12.9	%
Medicaid	166.57		162.59		156.21		157.62		158.25		212.22		163.86		162.31		1.0	%
Private and other payors	187.01		181.82		175.17		168.03		159.47		192.29		180.95		179.04		1.1	%
Total skilled nursing revenue	$	275.83	$	252.77	$	214.39	$	200.09	$	212.33	$	249.55	$	260.25	$	242.77	7.2	%

Same Facility Medicare daily rates increased by 16.1%, due to increased acuity levels and rates. The first quarter 2011 results include the impact of the implementation of RUGS IV on both revenue reimbursement and related cost structure changes included in MDS 3.0 and concurrent therapy. Historically, we have generally experienced lower occupancy rates, lower skilled mix and quality mix at Recently Acquired Facilities and therefore, we anticipate generally lower overall occupancy during years of growth. Accordingly, the overall average Medicare daily rate increased by 15.7% for the three months ended March 31, 2011 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2010 as a result of the impact of lower acuity levels at Transitioning and Recently Acquired Facilities.

The average Medicaid rate increased 1.0% for the three months ended March 31, 2011 relative to the same period in the prior year, primarily due to increases in rates in several states, offset by decreases in other states. In addition, we have experienced continued growth in our managed care rates as we have and will continue to enhance our relationships with these organizations to appropriately service resident needs in their respective communities.

In the future, if we acquire additional facilities into our overall portfolio, we expect this trend to continue. Accordingly, we anticipate our overall occupancy will vary from quarter to quarter based upon the maturity of the facilities within our portfolio.

Table of Contents

Payor Sources as a Percentage of Skilled Nursing Services. We use both our skilled mix and quality mix as measures of the quality of reimbursements we receive at our skilled nursing facilities over various periods. The following tables set forth our percentage of skilled nursing patient revenue and days by payor source:



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	Same Facility				Transitioning				Acquisitions				Total
	2011		2010		2011		2010		2011		2010		2011		2010
Percentage of Skilled Nursing Revenue:
Medicare	38.3	%	34.5	%	27.8	%	26.2	%	32.7	%	22.7	%	36.5	%	33.0	%
Managed care	15.1		15.3		9.6		5.8		2.7		6.8		13.6		13.7
Other skilled	3.3		3.6		0.5		—		1.6		6.2		2.7		3.1
Skilled mix	56.7		53.4		37.9		32.0		37.0		35.7		52.8		49.8
Private and other payors	7.2		7.8		10.9		11.8		16.9		16.9		8.3		8.6
Quality mix	63.9		61.2		48.8		43.8		53.9		52.6		61.1		58.4
Medicaid	36.1		38.8		51.2		56.2		46.1		47.4		38.9		41.6
Total skilled nursing	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0