UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

 

FORM 10-Q

 

(Mark One)

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2018

OR

For the transition period from                      to                     

Commission File Number: 001-14129

 

STAR GROUP, L.P.

(Exact name of registrants as specified in its charters)

 

 

(203) 328-7310

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  ☒    No  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  ☒    No  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, accelerated filer, non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

 

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).    Yes  ☐    No  ☒

At April 30, 2018, the registrant had 53,979,917 Common Units outstanding.

 

 

 

 

---

STAR GROUP, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

INDEX TO FORM 10-Q

 

 

2

---

Part I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

STAR GROUP, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

 

 

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

3

---

STAR GROUP, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

 

 

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

4

---

STAR GROUP, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

 

 

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

5

---

STAR GROUP, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF PARTNERS’ CAPITAL

 

 

 

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

6

---

STAR GROUP, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 

 

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

7

---

STAR GROUP, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

1) Organization

Star Group, L.P. (“Star” the “Company,” “we,” “us,” or “our”) is a full service provider specializing in the sale of home heating products and services to residential and commercial customers. The Company also services and sells heating and air conditioning equipment to its home heating oil and propane customers and to a lesser extent, provides these offerings to customers outside of our home heating oil and propane customer base. In certain of our marketing areas, we provide home security and plumbing services primarily to our home heating oil and propane customer base. We also sell diesel fuel, gasoline and home heating oil on a delivery only basis. These products and services are offered through our home heating oil and propane locations. The Company has one reportable segment for accounting purposes. We believe we are the nation’s largest retail distributor of home heating oil based upon sales volume. Including our propane locations, we serve customers in the more northern and eastern states within the Northeast, Central and Southeast U.S. regions.

The Company is organized as follows:

2) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Star Group, L.P. and its subsidiaries. All material intercompany items and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The financial information included herein is unaudited; however, such information reflects all adjustments (consisting solely of normal recurring adjustments), which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for the fair statement of financial condition and results for the interim periods. Due to the seasonal nature of the Company’s business, the results of operations and cash flows for the six month period ended March 31, 2018 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.

These interim financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and should be read in conjunction with the financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2017.

Comprehensive Income

Comprehensive income is comprised of Net income and Other comprehensive income (loss). Other comprehensive income (loss) consists of the unrealized gain amortization on the Company’s pension plan obligation for its two frozen defined benefit pension plans, unrealized loss on captive insurance collateral, and the corresponding tax effect.

8

---

Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Restricted Cash

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less, when purchased, to be cash equivalents. At March 31, 2018, the $35.7 million of cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash on the condensed consolidated statement of cash flows is composed of $35.4 million of cash and cash equivalents and $0.3 million of restricted cash. At September 30, 2017, the $52.7 million of cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash on the condensed consolidated statements of cash flow is composed of $52.5 million of cash and cash equivalents and $0.3 million of restricted cash. Restricted cash represents deposits held by our captive insurance company that are required by state insurance regulations to remain in the captive insurance company as cash.

Captive Insurance Collateral

At March 31, 2018, captive insurance collateral is comprised of $43.9 million of Level 1 debt securities measured at fair value and $1.3 million of mutual funds measured at net asset value.  At September 30, 2017, the balance was comprised of $11.3 million of Level 1 debt securities measured at fair value and $0.5 million of mutual funds measured at net asset value. Unrealized gains and losses, net of related income taxes, are reported as accumulated other comprehensive loss, except for losses from impairments which are determined to be other-than-temporary. Realized gains and losses, and declines in value judged to be other-than-temporary on available-for-sale securities are included in the determination of net income and are included in Interest expense, net, at which time the average cost basis of these securities are adjusted to fair value.

The investments are held by our captive insurance company in an irrevocable trust as collateral for certain workers’ compensation, general and automobile liability claims.  The collateral is required by a third party insurance carrier that insures per claim amounts above a set deductible. Due to the expected timing of claim payments, the nature of the collateral agreement with the carrier, and our captive insurance company’s source of other operating cash, the collateral is not expected to be used to pay obligations within the next twelve months.  

At September 30, 2017, the investments were held for workers’ compensation, general and automobile liability claims incurred and expected to be incurred in fiscal 2017.  In the first quarter of fiscal 2018 we deposited $34.2 million of cash into the irrevocable trust to secure certain workers’ compensation, general and automobile liability claims incurred and expected to be incurred from fiscal 2004 to fiscal 2016 and fiscal 2018.

Weather Hedge Contract

To partially mitigate the adverse effect of warm weather on cash flows, the Company has used weather hedge contracts for a number of years. Weather hedge contracts are recorded in accordance with the intrinsic value method defined by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 815-45-15 Derivatives and Hedging, Weather Derivatives (EITF 99-2). The premium paid is included in the caption Prepaid expenses and other current assets in the accompanying balance sheets and amortized over the life of the contract, with the intrinsic value method applied at each interim period.

The Company has weather hedge contracts for fiscal years 2017, 2018 and 2019.  Under these contracts, we are entitled to receive a payment if the total number of degree days within the hedge period is less than the prior ten year average. The “Payment Thresholds,” or strikes, are set at various levels. In addition, we will be obligated to make a payment capped at $5.0 million if degree days exceed the prior ten year average. The hedge period runs from November 1 through March 31, taken as a whole, for each respective fiscal year.  For fiscal 2019 the maximum that the Company can receive is $12.5 million and the maximum that the Company would be obligated to pay is $5.0 million.  As of March 31, 2018, the Company recorded a charge of $1.9 million under this contract that increased delivery and branch expenses. The amount was paid in April 2018.  No charge or benefit was recorded as of March 31, 2017.

New England Teamsters and Trucking Industry Pension Fund (“the NETTI Fund”) Liability

As of March 31, 2018, we had $0.2 million and $17.2 million balances included in the captions Accrued expenses and other current liabilities and Other long-term liabilities, respectively, on our condensed consolidated balance sheet representing the remaining balance of the NETTI withdrawal liability. Based on the borrowing rates currently available to the Company for long-term financing of a similar maturity, the fair value of the NETTI withdrawal liability as of March 31, 2018 was $21.8 million. We utilized Level 2 inputs in the fair value hierarchy of valuation techniques to determine the fair value of this liability.

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-11, Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory. The update changes the measurement principle for inventory from the lower of cost or market to the lower of cost and net realizable value. The Company adopted the ASU effective December 31, 2017.  The adoption of ASU No. 2015-11 did not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

9

---

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. The FASB has also issued several updates to ASU 2014-09. This ASU will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in GAAP when it becomes effective. This new guidance is effective for our annual reporting period beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2019, with early adoption permitted beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2018. The standard permits the use of either the retrospective or cumulative effect transition method. The Company is in the process of evaluating the effect that ASU 2014-09 will have on its revenue streams, consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. The Company has not yet selected a transition method, nor does it intend to early adopt.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases. The update requires all leases with a term greater than twelve months to be recognized on the balance sheet by calculating the discounted present value of such leases and accounting for them through a right-of-use asset and an offsetting lease liability, and the disclosure of key information pertaining to leasing arrangements. This new guidance is effective for our annual reporting period beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2020, with early adoption permitted. The Company does not intend to early adopt. The Company is continuing to evaluate the effect that ASU No. 2016-02 could have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures, but has not yet selected a transition method. The new guidance will materially change how we account for operating leases for office space, trucks and other equipment. Upon adoption, we expect to recognize discounted right-of-use assets and offsetting lease liabilities related to our operating leases of office space, trucks and other equipment. As of March 31, 2018, the undiscounted future minimum lease payments through 2032 for such operating leases are approximately $128.2 million, but the amount of leasing activity expected between March 31, 2018, and the date of adoption, is currently unknown. For this reason we are unable to estimate the discounted right-of-use assets and lease liabilities as of the date of adoption.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses. The update broadens the information that an entity should consider in developing expected credit loss estimates, eliminates the probable initial recognition threshold, and allows for the immediate recognition of the full amount of expected credit losses. This new guidance is effective for our annual reporting period beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2021, with early adoption permitted in the first quarter of fiscal 2020. The Company is evaluating the effect that ASU No. 2016-13 will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures, but has not yet determined the timing of adoption.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flow (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments. The update addresses the issues of debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs, settlement of zero-coupon debt instruments or other debt instruments with coupon interest rates that are insignificant in relation to the effective interest rate of the borrowing, contingent consideration payments made after a business combination, proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims, proceeds from the settlement of corporate owned life insurance policies, distributions received from equity method investees, beneficial interests in securitization transactions, and separately identifiable cash flows and application of the predominance principle. This new guidance is effective for our annual reporting period beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2019, with early adoption permitted. The Company has not determined the timing of adoption, but does not expect ASU 2016-15 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the definition of a business. The update clarifies the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. This new guidance is effective for our annual reporting period beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2019, with early adoption permitted. The Company has not determined the timing of adoption, but does not expect ASU 2017-01 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 230): Simplifying the test for goodwill impairment. The update simplifies how an entity is required to test goodwill for impairment. An entity should recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value, but not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to the reporting unit. This new guidance is effective for our annual reporting period beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2021, with early adoption permitted. The Company has not determined the timing of adoption, but does not expect ASU 2017-04 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

 

In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-02, Income Statement – Reporting Comprehensive Income, which allow a reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings for stranded tax effects resulting from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.  This new guidance is effective for our annual reporting period beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2020, with early adoption permitted.  The Company is evaluating the effect that ASU No. 2018-02 will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures, but has not determined the timing of adoption.

 

10

---

3) Common Unit Repurchase and Retirement

In July 2012, the Board adopted a plan to repurchase certain of the Company’s Common Units (“Plan III”).  Prior to February 2018, the Company had repurchased approximately 2.7 million Common Units under Plan III.  In February 2018, the Board authorized an increase of the number of Common Units that are available for the Company to repurchase from 2.2 million to a total of 5.5 million, of which, 3.0 million were available for repurchase in open market transactions and 2.5 million were available for repurchase in privately-negotiated transactions. The Company repurchased approximately 1.3 million Common Units in the second fiscal quarter of 2018, and 4.2 million total Common Units remain available for repurchase at the end of the quarter.  There is no guarantee of the exact number of units that will be purchased under the program and the Company may discontinue purchases at any time. The program does not have a time limit. The Board may also approve additional purchases of units from time to time in private transactions. The Company’s repurchase activities take into account SEC safe harbor rules and guidance for issuer repurchases. All of the Common Units purchased in the repurchase program will be retired.

Under the Company’s third amended and restated credit agreement dated July 30, 2015, in order to repurchase Common Units we must maintain Availability (as defined in the amended and restated credit agreement) of $45 million, 15.0% of the facility size of $300 million (assuming the non-seasonal aggregate commitment is in effect) on a historical pro forma and forward-looking basis, and a fixed charge coverage ratio of not less than 1.15 measured as of the date of repurchase. The Company was in compliance with this covenant as of March 31, 2018.

The following table shows repurchases under Plan III.

 

 

 

 

4) Derivatives and Hedging—Disclosures and Fair Value Measurements

FASB ASC 815-10-05 Derivatives and Hedging, established accounting and reporting standards requiring that derivative instruments be recorded at fair value and included in the consolidated balance sheet as assets or liabilities, along with qualitative disclosures regarding the derivative activity. The Company uses derivative instruments such as futures, options and swap agreements in order to mitigate exposure to market risk associated with the purchase of home heating oil for price-protected customers, physical inventory on hand, inventory in transit, priced purchase commitments and internal fuel usage. The Company has elected not to designate its derivative instruments as hedging derivatives, but rather as economic hedges whose change in fair value is recognized in its statement of operations in the line item (increase) decrease in the fair value of derivative instruments. Depending on the risk being economically hedged, realized gains and losses are recorded in cost of product, cost of installations and services, or delivery and branch expenses.

As of March 31, 2018, to hedge a substantial majority of the purchase price associated with heating oil gallons anticipated to be sold to its price-protected customers, the Company held the following derivative instruments that settle in future months to match anticipated sales: 8.8 million gallons of swap contracts, 2.2 million gallons of call options, 4.2 million gallons of put options, and 53.3 million net gallons of synthetic call options. To hedge the inter-month differentials for its price-protected customers, its physical inventory on hand and inventory in transit, the Company, as of March 31, 2018, had 34.4 million gallons of long future contracts, and 53.4 million gallons of short future contracts that settle in future months.  To hedge its internal fuel usage and other related activities for fiscal 2018, the Company, as of March 31, 2018, had 1.1 million gallons of swap contracts that settle in future months.

11

---

As of March 31, 2017, to hedge a substantial majority of the purchase price associated with heating oil gallons anticipated to be sold to its price-protected customers, the Company held the following derivative instruments that settle in future months to match anticipated sales: 8.0 million gallons of swap contracts, 2.1 million gallons of call options, 5.1 million gallons of put options, and 52.1 million net gallons of synthetic call options. To hedge the inter-month differentials for its price-protected customers, its physical inventory on hand and inventory in transit, the Company, as of March 31, 2017, had 0.3 million gallons of long swap contracts, 33.6 million gallons of long future contracts, and 47.6 million gallons of short future contracts that settle in future months. In addition to the previously described hedging instruments, the Company as of March 31, 2017, had 1.0 million gallons of spread contracts (simultaneous long and short positions) to lock-in the differential between high sulfur home heating oil and ultra low sulfur diesel. To hedge its internal fuel usage and other related activities for fiscal 2017, the Company, as of March 31, 2017, had 1.4 million gallons of swap contracts that settle in future months.

The Company’s derivative instruments are with the following counterparties: Bank of America, N.A., Bank of Montreal, Cargill, Inc., Citibank, N.A., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Key Bank, N.A., Munich Re Trading LLC, Regions Financial Corporation, Societe Generale, and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. The Company assesses counterparty credit risk and considers it to be low. We maintain master netting arrangements that allow for the non-conditional offsetting of amounts receivable and payable with counterparties to help manage our risks and record derivative positions on a net basis. The Company generally does not receive cash collateral from its counterparties and does not restrict the use of cash collateral it maintains at counterparties. At March 31, 2018, the aggregate cash posted as collateral in the normal course of business at counterparties was $1.2 million and recorded in prepaid expense and other current assets. Positions with counterparties who are also parties to our credit agreement are collateralized under that facility. As of March 31, 2018, no hedge positions and payable amounts were secured under the credit facility.

FASB ASC 820-10 Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, established a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which classified the inputs used in measuring fair value. These tiers include: Level 1, defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets; Level 2, defined as inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable; and Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions. The Company’s Level 1 derivative assets and liabilities represent the fair value of commodity contracts used in its hedging activities that are identical and traded in active markets. The Company’s Level 2 derivative assets and liabilities represent the fair value of commodity contracts used in its hedging activities that are valued using either directly or indirectly observable inputs, whose nature, risk and class are similar. No significant transfers of assets or liabilities have been made into and out of the Level 1 or Level 2 tiers. All derivative instruments were non-trading positions and were either a Level 1 or Level 2 instrument. The Company had no Level 3 derivative instruments. The fair market value of our Level 1 and Level 2 derivative assets and liabilities are calculated by our counter-parties and are independently validated by the Company. The Company’s calculations are, for Level 1 derivative assets and liabilities, based on the published New York Mercantile Exchange (“NYMEX”) market prices for the commodity contracts open at the end of the period. For Level 2 derivative assets and liabilities the calculations performed by the Company are based on a combination of the NYMEX published market prices and other inputs, including such factors as present value, volatility and duration.

12

---

The Company had no assets or liabilities that are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis subsequent to their initial recognition. The Company’s financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are listed on the following table.

 

 

13

---

The Company’s derivative assets (liabilities) offset by counterparty and subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement are listed on the following table.

 

 

 

5) Inventories

The Company’s product inventories are stated at the lower of cost and net realizable value computed on the weighted average cost method. All other inventories, representing parts and equipment are stated at the lower of cost and net realizable value using the FIFO method. The components of inventory were as follows (in thousands):

 

 

14

---

6) Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is computed over the estimated useful lives of the depreciable assets using the straight-line method (in thousands):

 

 

7) Business Combinations

During fiscal 2018, the Company acquired two heating oil dealers for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $0.3 million.  The acquired companies’ operating results are included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements starting on their respective acquisition dates, and are not material to the Company’s financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

8) Goodwill and Intangibles, net

Goodwill

A summary of changes in the Company’s goodwill is as follows (in thousands):

 

 

Intangibles, net

The gross carrying amount and accumulated amortization of intangible assets subject to amortization are as follows (in thousands):

 

 

Amortization expense for intangible assets was $9.6 million for the six months ended March 31, 2018, compared to $7.8 million for the six months ended March 31, 2017.

9) Long-Term Debt and Bank Facility Borrowings

The Company’s debt is as follows (in thousands):

 

 

15

---

On July 30, 2015, the Company entered into a third amended and restated asset-based credit agreement with a bank syndicate comprised of thirteen participants, which enables the Company to borrow up to $300 million ($450 million during the heating season of December through April of each year) on a revolving credit facility for working capital purposes (subject to certain borrowing base limitations and coverage ratios), provides for a $100 million five-year senior secured term loan (the “Term Loan”), allows for the issuance of up to $100 million in letters of credit, and has a maturity date of July 30, 2020.

The Company can increase the revolving credit facility size by $100 million without the consent of the bank group. However, the bank group is not obligated to fund the $100 million increase. If the bank group elects not to fund the increase, the Company can add additional lenders to the group, with the consent of the Agent (as defined in the credit agreement), which shall not be unreasonably withheld. Obligations under the third amended and restated credit facility are guaranteed by the Company and its subsidiaries and are secured by liens on substantially all of the Company’s assets including accounts receivable, inventory, general intangibles, real property, fixtures and equipment.

All amounts outstanding under the third amended and restated revolving credit facility become due and payable on the facility termination date of July 30, 2020. The Term Loan is repayable in quarterly payments of $2.5 million, plus an annual payment equal to 25% of the annual Excess Cash Flow as defined in the agreement (an amount not to exceed $15 million annually), less certain voluntary prepayments made during the year, with final payment at maturity.

The interest rate on the third amended and restated revolving credit facility and the Term Loan is based on a margin over LIBOR or a base rate. At March 31, 2018, the effective interest rate on the Term Loan was approximately 4.5% and the effective interest rate on revolving credit facility borrowings was approximately 3.7%.

The Commitment Fee on the unused portion of the revolving credit facility is 0.30% from December through April, and 0.20% from May through November.

The third amended and restated credit agreement requires the Company to meet certain financial covenants, including a fixed charge coverage ratio (as defined in the credit agreement) of not less than 1.1 as long as the Term Loan is outstanding or revolving credit facility availability is less than 12.5% of the facility size. In addition, as long as the Term Loan is outstanding, a senior secured leverage ratio at any time cannot be more than 3.0 as calculated during the quarters ending June or September, and at any time no more than 4.5 as calculated during the quarters ending December or March.

Certain restrictions are also imposed by the agreement, including restrictions on the Company’s ability to incur additional indebtedness, to pay distributions to unitholders, to pay certain inter-company dividends or distributions, make investments, grant liens, sell assets, make acquisitions and engage in certain other activities.

At March 31, 2018, $71.3 million of the Term Loan was outstanding, $115 million was outstanding under the revolving credit facility, no hedge positions were secured under the credit agreement, and $7.1 million of letters of credit were issued and outstanding. At September 30, 2017, $76.3 million of the Term Loan was outstanding, no amount was outstanding under the revolving credit facility, $0.1 million of hedge positions were secured under the credit agreement, and $48 million of letters of credit were issued and outstanding.

At March 31, 2018, availability was $177.9 million, and the Company was in compliance with the fixed charge coverage ratio and the senior secured leverage ratio. At September 30, 2017, availability was $166.1 million, and the Company was in compliance with the fixed charge coverage ratio and the senior secured leverage ratio.

 

10) Income Taxes

At a special meeting held October 25, 2017, unitholders voted in favor of proposals to have the Company be treated as a corporation effective November 1, 2017,  instead of a partnership, for federal income tax purposes (commonly referred to as a “check-the-box” election) along with amendments to our Partnership Agreement to effect such changes in income tax classification.  For corporate subsidiaries of the Company, a consolidated Federal income tax return is filed. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amount of assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss carry-forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. A valuation allowance is recognized if, based on the weight of available evidence including historical tax losses, it is more likely than not that some or all of deferred tax assets will not be realized.

16

---

On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Reform Act”) was enacted into law.  The Tax Reform Act is a complicated piece of legislation that, among other provisions, contains several key provisions which impact the Company, especially the reduction of the Federal corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018. In addition, between September 28, 2017 and December 31, 2022, the Tax Reform Act allows for the full depreciation, in the year acquired, for certain fixed assets purchased in that year (also known as 100% bonus depreciation).

Given the significance and complexity of the legislation, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 (SAB 118), which allows registrants to record provisional amounts during a one year “measurement period” similar to that used when accounting for business combinations. During the measurement period, impacts of the law are expected to be recorded at the time a reasonable estimate for all or a portion of the effects can be made, and provisional amounts can be recognized and adjusted as information becomes available, prepared or analyzed.

As of March 31, 2018, the income tax benefit is based, in part, on a reasonable estimate of deferred tax balances as of the enactment of the Tax Reform Act.  The estimate of such deferred tax balances is provisional.  The provisional re-measurement of the deferred tax assets and liabilities resulted in an $11.5 million discrete tax benefit recorded in the quarter ended December 31, 2017.  The provisional re-measurement amount decreased by $0.2 million in the quarter ended March 31, 2018 and is anticipated to change as data becomes available allowing more accurate scheduling of certain deferred tax assets and liabilities.  We anticipate finalizing and recording any resulting adjustments by September 30, 2018.

The effective tax rate for the three and six months ended March 31, 2018 is 33.8% and 23.8%, respectively.  The income tax provision for the three and six months ended March 31, 2018 reflects the application of blended statutory rates for calendar years 2017 and 2018 to the quarter’s results, as well as recognition of the $11.2 million provisional tax benefit due to reduction in the Federal corporate tax rate.  As a result of the tax reform, the Company’s net deferred tax liability will be realized at a lower statutory tax rate than when originally recorded, resulting in the aforementioned tax benefit.  Excluding the impact of the tax benefit related to this net deferred tax liability, our effective income tax rate decreased from 40.9% at March 31, 2017 to 33.9% at March 31, 2018 primarily due to the lower enacted Federal statutory tax rate.

The accompanying financial statements are reported on a fiscal year, however, the Company and its corporate subsidiaries file Federal and State income tax returns on a calendar year.

The current and deferred income tax (benefit) and expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2018, and 2017 are as follows:

 

 

At March 31, 2018, we did not have unrecognized income tax benefits.

Our continuing practice is to recognize interest and penalties related to income tax matters as a component of income tax expense. We file U.S. Federal income tax returns and various state and local returns. A number of years may elapse before an uncertain tax position is audited and finally resolved. For our Federal income tax returns we have four tax years subject to examination. In our major state tax jurisdictions of New York, Connecticut, Pennsylvania we have four years that are subject to examination. In the state tax jurisdictions of New Jersey we have five tax years that are subject to examination. While it is often difficult to predict the final outcome or the timing of resolution of any particular uncertain tax position, based on our assessment of many factors including past experience and interpretation of tax law, we believe that our provision for income taxes reflect the most probable outcome. This assessment relies on estimates and assumptions and may involve a series of complex judgments about future events.

17

---

11) Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information

 

 

12) Commitments and Contingencies

On April 18, 2017, a civil action was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, entitled M. Norman Donnenfeld v. Petro, Inc., Civil Action Number 2:17-cv-2310-JFB-SIL, against Petro, Inc. By amended complaint filed on August 15, 2017, the Plaintiff alleges he did not receive expected contractual benefits under his protected price plan contract when oil prices fell and asserts various claims for relief including breach of contract, violation of the New York General Business Law and fraud. The Plaintiff also seeks to have a class certified of similarly situated Petro customers who entered into protected price plan contracts and were denied the same contractual benefits. No class has yet been certified in this action. The Plaintiff seeks compensatory, punitive and other damages in unspecified amounts. On September 15, 2017, Petro filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint as time-barred and for failure to state a cause of action. The motion was argued on January 18, 2018 and a decision is awaited. The Company believes the allegations lack merit and intends to vigorously defend the action; at this time we cannot assess the potential outcome or materiality of this matter.

The Company’s operations are subject to the operating hazards and risks normally incidental to handling, storing and transporting and otherwise providing for use by consumers hazardous liquids such as home heating oil and propane. In the ordinary course of business, the Company is a defendant in various legal proceedings and litigation. The Company records a liability when it is probable that a loss has been incurred and the amount is reasonably estimable. We do not believe these matters, when considered individually or in the aggregate, could reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, financial position or liquidity.

The Company maintains insurance policies with insurers in amounts and with coverages and deductibles we believe are reasonable and prudent. However, the Company cannot assure that this insurance will be adequate to protect it from all material expenses related to current and potential future claims, legal proceedings and litigation, including the above mentioned action, as certain types of claims may be excluded from our insurance coverage. If we incur substantial liability and the damages are not covered by insurance, or are in excess of policy limits, or if we incur liability at a time when we are not able to obtain liability insurance, then our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.

13) Earnings Per Limited Partner Unit

Income per limited partner unit is computed in accordance with FASB ASC 260-10-05 Earnings Per Share, Master Limited Partnerships (EITF 03-06), by dividing the limited partners’ interest in net income by the weighted average number of limited partner units outstanding. The pro forma nature of the allocation required by this standard provides that in any accounting period where the Company’s aggregate net income exceeds its aggregate distribution for such period, the Company is required to present net income per limited partner unit as if all of the earnings for the periods were distributed, regardless of whether those earnings would actually be distributed during a particular period from an economic or practical perspective. This allocation does not impact the Company’s overall net income or other financial results. However, for periods in which the Company’s aggregate net income exceeds its aggregate distributions for such period, it will have the impact of reducing the earnings per limited partner unit, as the calculation according to this standard result in a theoretical increased allocation of undistributed earnings to the general partner. In accounting periods where aggregate net income does not exceed aggregate distributions for such period, this standard does not have any impact on the Company’s net income per limited partner unit calculation. A separate and independent calculation for each quarter and year-to-date period is performed, in which the Company’s contractual participation rights are taken into account.

18

---

The following presents the net income allocation and per unit data using this method for the periods presented:

 

 

14) Subsequent Events

Acquisition

In April 2018, the Company purchased the customer list and assets of a heating oil dealer for an aggregate amount of approximately $16.5 million; $16.1 million in cash and $0.4 million of deferred liabilities. The purchase price was allocated $9.6 million to intangible assets, $3.4 million to fixed assets and $3.5 million to working capital.

Quarterly Distribution Declared

In April 2018, we declared a quarterly distribution of $0.1175 per unit, or $0.47 per unit on an annualized basis, on all Common Units with respect to the second quarter of fiscal 2018, payable on May 7, 2018, to holders of record on April 27, 2018. The amount of distributions in excess of the minimum quarterly distribution of $0.0675 are distributed in accordance with our Partnership Agreement, subject to the management incentive compensation plan. As a result, $6.3 million will be paid to the Common Unit holders, $0.2 million to the General Partner unit holders (including $0.2 million of incentive distribution as provided in our Partnership Agreement) and $0.2 million to management pursuant to the management incentive compensation plan which provides for certain members of management to receive incentive distributions that would otherwise be payable to the General Partner.

Common Units Repurchased and Retired

In accordance with the Plan III common unit repurchase program, during April 2018 the Company repurchased and retired 0.6 million Common Units at an average price paid of $9.71 per unit.

 

19

---

ITEM 2.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Disclosure

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q includes “forward-looking statements” which represent our expectations or beliefs concerning future events that involve risks and uncertainties, including those associated with the effect of weather conditions on our financial performance, the price and supply of the products that we sell, the consumption patterns of our customers, our ability to obtain satisfactory gross profit margins, our ability to obtain new customers and retain existing customers, our ability to make strategic acquisitions, the impact of litigation, our ability to contract for our current and future supply needs, natural gas conversions, future union relations and the outcome of current and future union negotiations, the impact of current and future governmental regulations, including environmental, health, and safety regulations, the ability to attract and retain employees, customer credit worthiness, counterparty credit worthiness, marketing plans, general economic conditions and new technology. All statements other than statements of historical facts included in this Report including, without limitation, the statements under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and elsewhere herein, are forward-looking statements. Without limiting the foregoing, the words “believe,” “anticipate,” “plan,” “expect,” “seek,” “estimate,” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, we can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct and actual results may differ materially from those projected as a result of certain risks and uncertainties. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, those set forth in this Report under the headings “Risk Factors” and “Business Strategy.” Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations (“Cautionary Statements”) are disclosed in this Report. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to Star or persons acting on its behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the Cautionary Statements. Unless otherwise required by law, we undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise after the date of this Report.

Additional Cash Investment into an Irrevocable Trust – Captive Insurance Company

On October 11, 2017 we deposited $34.2 million of cash into an irrevocable trust to secure certain liabilities for our captive insurance company and, several days later, $36.6 million of letters of credit were cancelled that previously had secured these liabilities. The cash deposited into the trust is shown on our balance sheet as Captive Insurance Collateral and, correspondingly, reduced the amount of cash on our balance sheet. We believe that this investment into the irrevocable trust will lower our letter of credit fees, increase interest income on invested cash balances and provide us with certain tax advantages attributable to a captive insurance company. As a result of these transactions, our ability to borrow from our bank group increased by $2.4 million, as the decrease in letters of credit was greater than the cash deposit.

Change in Federal Income Tax Classification and Name Change

At a special meeting held October 25, 2017, unitholders voted in favor of proposals to have the Company be treated as a corporation, instead of a partnership, for federal income tax purposes (commonly referred to as a “check-the-box” election) along with amendments to our limited partnership agreement to effect such changes in income tax classification. In addition, we changed our name to Star Group, L.P., and will continue to trade on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker “SGU.” The name change was made to more closely align our name with the scope of products and services we offer.

We believe that, by being treated as a corporation for federal income tax purposes, instead of a partnership, we will (i) eliminate unitholders’ out-of-pocket tax burden (“phantom income”) arising from allocating taxable income to them without making corresponding cash distributions; (ii) potentially broaden our base of interested investors; (iii) enable us to fully deduct for tax purposes certain public company-related expenses; and (iv) lower our administrative expenses by eliminating Schedules K-1, which will no longer be necessary. For tax years after December 31, 2017, unitholders will receive a Form 1099-DIV and will not, as in previous years, receive a Schedule K-1. We will remain a Delaware limited partnership for state law purposes and the distribution provisions under our limited partnership agreement, including the incentive distributions, will not change.

Income Taxes

New Federal Income Tax Legislation

On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Reform Act”) was enacted into law.  The Tax Reform Act contains several key tax provisions that will impact the Company, including the reduction of the corporate Federal income tax rate from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018. In addition, between September 28, 2017 and December 31, 2022, the Tax Reform Act allows for the full depreciation, in the year acquired, for certain fixed assets purchased in that year (also known as 100% bonus depreciation).

20

---

During the six months ended March 31, 2018, the Company recorded an $11.2 million discrete income tax benefit for the re-measurement of deferred tax assets and liabilities due to the change in the Federal corporate income tax rate on which the deferred taxes are based.  Excluding the $11.2 million benefit recorded to income tax expense, our effective income tax rate was reduced from 40.9% at March 31, 2017 to 33.9% for the six months ended March 31, 2018.  

Book versus Tax Deductions

The amount of cash flow that we generate in any given year depends upon a variety of factors including the amount of cash income taxes that we are required to pay, which will increase as tax depreciation and amortization decreases. The amount of depreciation and amortization that we deduct for book (i.e., financial reporting) purposes will differ from the amount that the Company can deduct for tax purposes. The table below compares the estimated depreciation and amortization for book purposes to the amount that we expect to deduct for tax purposes based on currently owned assets. We file our tax returns based on a calendar year. The amounts below are based on our September 30 fiscal year, and the tax amounts include any 100% bonus depreciation available for fixed assets purchased between October 1, 2017 and March 31, 2018.  The depreciation for any expected future fixed assets purchases is not reflected in the table.

Estimated Depreciation and Amortization Expense

 

Seasonality

The following matters should be considered in analyzing our financial results. Our fiscal year ends on September 30. All references to quarters and years respectively in this document are to the fiscal quarters and years unless otherwise noted. The seasonal nature of our business has resulted, on average, during the last five years, in the sale of approximately 30% of our volume of home heating oil and propane in the first fiscal quarter and 50% of our volume in the second fiscal quarter, the peak heating season. We generally realize net income in both of these quarters and net losses during the quarters ending June and September. In addition, sales volume typically fluctuates from year to year in response to variations in weather, wholesale energy prices and other factors.

Degree Day

A “degree day” is an industry measurement of temperature designed to evaluate energy demand and consumption. Degree days are based on how far the average daily temperature departs from 65°F. Each degree of temperature above 65°F is counted as one cooling degree day, and each degree of temperature below 65°F is counted as one heating degree day. Degree days are accumulated each day over the course of a year and can be compared to a monthly or a long-term (multi-year) average to see if a month or a year was warmer or cooler than usual. Degree days are officially observed by the National Weather Service.

Every ten years, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (“NOAA”) computes and publishes average meteorological quantities, including the average temperature for the last 30 years by geographical location, and the corresponding degree days. The latest and most widely used data covers the years from 1981 to 2010. Our calculations of normal weather are based on these published 30 year averages for heating degree days, weighted by volume for the locations where we have existing operations.

Weather Hedge Contracts

Weather conditions have a significant impact on the demand for home heating oil and propane because certain customers depend on these products principally for space heating purposes. Actual weather conditions may vary substantially from year to year, significantly affecting our financial performance. To partially mitigate the adverse effect of warm weather on cash flow, we have used weather hedging contracts for a number of years with several providers.

During both fiscal 2012 and 2016, we collected $12.5 million for amounts due under our weather hedge contracts and recorded a corresponding credit of $12.5 million that reduced delivery and branch expenses each respective fiscal year. While temperatures were 12.4% warmer than normal (as defined by NOAA) in fiscal 2017, we did not receive a payout under our weather hedge contract because the Payment Thresholds were not met under the contract.

21

---

We have purchased weather hedge contracts for fiscal years 2018 and 2019. Under these contracts, we are entitled to a payment if the total number of degree days within the hedge period is less than the ten year average. The “Payment Thresholds,” or strikes, are set at various levels. In addition, we will be obligated to make a payment capped at $5.0 million if degree days exceed the ten year average. The hedge period runs from November 1 through March 31, taken as a whole, for each respective fiscal year. For fiscal 2019, the maximum that the Company can receive is $12.5 million and the maximum that the Company would be obligated to pay is $5.0 million.

As of March 31, 2018, we have recorded a liability of $1.9 million under our weather hedge contracts and have increased delivery and branch expense by that amount. The Company had previously recorded a charge of $3.1 million in the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2017 for the weather hedge period, but that charge was reduced as temperatures during the fiscal second quarter were warmer than the Payment Threshold.

Per Gallon Gross Profit Margins

We believe home heating oil and propane margins should be evaluated on a cents per gallon basis (before the effects of increases or decreases in the fair value of derivative instruments), as we believe that realized per gallon margins should not include the impact of non-cash changes in the market value of hedges before the settlement of the underlying transaction.

A significant portion of our home heating oil volume is sold to individual customers under an arrangement pre-establishing a ceiling price or fixed price for home heating oil over a fixed period of time, generally twelve to twenty-four months (“price-protected” customers). When these price-protected customers agree to purchase home heating oil from us for the next heating season, we purchase option contracts, swaps and futures contracts for a substantial majority of the heating oil that we expect to sell to these customers. The amount of home heating oil volume that we hedge per price-protected customer is based upon the estimated fuel consumption per average customer per month. In the event that the actual usage exceeds the amount of the hedged volume on a monthly basis, we may be required to obtain additional volume at unfavorable costs. In addition, should actual usage in any month be less than the hedged volume, our hedging costs and losses could be greater, thus reducing expected margins.

As of March 31, 2018, we had 53.3 million gallons of home heating oil hedged for our ceiling customers and 8.8 million gallons for our fixed priced customers.  Over 88% of these hedges were at their strike price, which reduces the potential for per gallon margin expansion for these customers unless the price for home heating oil declines. During April 2018, the wholesale cost of home heating oil continued to increase, and over 98% of the hedges for price protected customers were at their strike price. In addition, the percentage of customers on variable pricing has decreased (and the percentage of customers who have elected price protection has increased), which may adversely impact home heating oil margins for the remainder of  fiscal 2018 and fiscal 2019 as the per-gallon margins realized from price–protected customers generally are less than variable-priced residential customers.

Impact on Liquidity of Wholesale Product Cost Volatility

Our liquidity is adversely impacted in times of increasing wholesale product costs, as we must use more cash to fund our hedging requirements as well as the increased levels of accounts receivable and inventory. Our liquidity can also be adversely impacted by sudden and sharp decreases in wholesale product costs, due to the increased margin requirements for futures contracts and collateral requirements for options and swaps that we use to manage market risks.

Home Heating Oil Price Volatility

Volatility, which is reflected in the wholesale price of home heating oil, has a larger impact on our business when prices rise, as consumer price sensitivity to heating costs increases, often leading to increased gross customer losses. As a commodity, the price of home heating oil is generally impacted by many factors, including economic and geopolitical forces. The price of home heating oil is closely linked to the price refiners pay for crude oil, which is the principal cost component of home heating oil. The volatility in the wholesale cost of home heating oil, as measured by the New York Mercantile Exchange (“NYMEX”), for the fiscal years ending September 30, 2014, through 2018, on a quarterly basis, is illustrated in the following chart (price per gallon):

 

 

 

22

---

Derivatives

FASB ASC 815-10-05 Derivatives and Hedging requires that derivative instruments be recorded at fair value and included in the consolidated balance sheet as assets or liabilities. To the extent derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges are effective, as defined under this guidance, changes in fair value are recognized in other comprehensive income until the forecasted hedged item is recognized in earnings. We have elected not to designate our derivative instruments as hedging instruments under this guidance and, as a result, the changes in fair value of the derivative instruments are recognized in our statement of operations. Therefore, we experience volatility in earnings as outstanding derivative instruments are marked to market and non-cash gains and losses are recorded prior to the sale of the commodity to the customer. The volatility in any given period related to unrealized non-cash gains or losses on derivative instruments can be significant to our overall results. However, we ultimately expect those gains and losses to be offset by the cost of product when purchased.

Customer Attrition

We measure net customer attrition on an ongoing basis for our full service residential and commercial home heating oil and propane customers. Net customer attrition is the difference between gross customer losses and customers added through marketing efforts. Customers added through acquisitions are not included in the calculation of gross customer gains. However, additional customers that are obtained through marketing efforts or lost at newly acquired businesses are included in these calculations. Customer attrition percentage calculations include customers added through acquisitions in the denominators of the calculations on a weighted average basis. Gross customer losses are the result of a number of factors, including price competition, move-outs, credit losses and conversion to natural gas. When a customer moves out of an existing home, we count the “move out” as a loss, and if we are successful in signing up the new homeowner, the “move in” is treated as a gain. 

Customer gains and losses of home heating oil and propane customers

 

 

Customer gains (attrition) as a percentage of home heating oil and propane customer base

 

 

For the six months ended March 31, 2018, the Company did not gain or lose any accounts (net) of our home heating oil and propane customer base, compared to 2,000 accounts gained (net), or 0.5% of our home heating oil and propane customer base, during the six months ended March 31, 2017. Our gross customer gains were 1,300 accounts higher than the prior year’s comparable period but our gross customer losses were 3,300 accounts higher. Our gross customer losses exceeded the prior year primarily as a result of customer losses due to the price of home heating oil, credit and service disruptions. The wholesale cost of home heating oil and propane increased by 18.5% per gallon putting additional price pressure on our customer base. Higher prices also drove up customer account balances resulting in higher credit related losses. In addition, the impact of the extremely cold temperatures and hazardous road conditions due to winter storms at the end of December 2017 and into January 2018 stressed our ability to service our customers at times and resulted in higher delivery and service losses.

During the six months ended March 31, 2018, we estimate that we lost 0.6% of our home heating oil accounts to natural gas conversions versus 0.6% for the six months ended March 31, 2017 and 0.8% for the six months ended March 31, 2016. Losses to natural gas in our footprint for the heating oil industry could be greater or less than the Company’s estimates. Conversions to natural gas may continue as it remains less expensive than home heating oil on an equivalent BTU basis.

23

---

Three Months Ended March 31, 2018

Compared to the Three Months Ended March 31, 2017

Volume

For the three months ended March 31, 2018, retail volume of home heating oil and propane sold increased by 25.9 million gallons, or 16.8%, to 180.1 million gallons, compared to 154.2 million gallons for the three months ended March 31, 2017. For those locations where the Company had existing operations during both periods, which we sometimes refer to as the “base business” (i.e., excluding acquisitions), temperatures (measured on a heating degree day basis) for the three months ended March 31, 2018 were 7.8% colder than the three months ended March 31, 2017 but 5.5% warmer than normal, as reported by NOAA. Temperatures fluctuated greatly during the 2018 fiscal second quarter, just as they did during the first quarter. For the twelve months ended March 31, 2018, net customer attrition for the base business was 2.0%. The impact of fuel conservation, along with any period-to-period differences in delivery scheduling, the timing of accounts added or lost during the fiscal years, equipment efficiency and other volume variances not otherwise described are included in the chart below under the heading “Other.” An analysis of the change in the retail volume of home heating oil and propane sold, which is based on management’s estimates, sampling and other mathematical calculations and certain assumptions, is found below: 

 

 

The following chart sets forth the percentage by volume of total home heating oil sold to residential variable-price customers, residential price-protected customers and commercial/industrial/other customers for the three months ended March 31, 2018 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2017:

 

 

Volume of other petroleum products sold increased by 3.6 million gallons, or 13.5%, to 30.1 million gallons for the three months ended March 31, 2018, primarily due to acquisitions (0.7 million gallons) and an increase in wholesale volume sold of 1.7 million gallons.

Product Sales

For the three months ended March 31, 2018, product sales increased $147.5 million, or 31.0%, to $623.0 million, compared to $475.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017 largely due to an increase in wholesale product cost of $0.3201 per gallon, or 20.0%, and an increase in total volume sold of 16.3%.

Installations and Services

For the three months ended March 31, 2018, installation and service revenue increased $4.5 million, or 8.0%, to $61.1 million, compared to $56.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017, due to the impact of colder temperatures and acquisitions. Installation sales increased by $1.0 million, largely due to acquisitions, and service revenue increased by $3.5 million, of which $1.3 million was due to acquisitions.

24

---

Cost of Product

For the three months ended March 31, 2018, cost of product increased $114.4 million, or 39.6%, to $403.3 million, compared to $288.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017, due to an increase in total volume sold of 16.3% and a $0.3201 per gallon, or 20.0%, increase in wholesale product cost.

Gross Profit — Product

The table below calculates the Company’s per gallon margins and reconciles product gross profit for home heating oil and propane and other petroleum products. We believe the change in home heating oil and propane margins should be evaluated before the effects of increases or decreases in the fair value of derivative instruments, as we believe that realized per gallon margins should not include the impact of non-cash changes in the market value of hedges before the settlement of the underlying transaction. On that basis, home heating oil and propane margins for the three months ended March 31, 2018 increased by $0.0127 per gallon, or 1.1%, to $1.1740 per gallon, from $1.1613 per gallon during the three months ended March 31, 2017. Excluding acquisitions, home heating oil and propane margins increased by $0.0272 per gallon, or 2.3%. Due to differences in product offerings, marketing plans and operating costs, acquisitions may have different home heating oil and propane margin requirements than the base business.  

Product sales and cost of product include home heating oil, propane, other petroleum products and liquidated damages billings.

 

 

 

 

For the three months ended March 31, 2018, total product gross profit was $219.7 million, an increase of $33.1 million, or 17.8%, versus the three months ended March 31, 2017, due to an increase in home heating oil and propane volume ($30.1 million) and an increase in home heating oil and propane margins ($2.2 million). Product gross profit from other petroleum products increased by $0.8 million due to an increase in volume.

As of March 31, 2018, we had 53.3 million gallons of home heating oil hedged for our ceiling customers and 8.8 million gallons for our fixed priced customers. Over 88% of these hedges were at their strike price, which reduces the potential for per gallon margin expansion for these customers unless the price for home heating oil declines. During April 2018, the wholesale cost of home heating oil continued to increase, and over 98% of our hedges for price protected customers were at their strike price. In addition, the percentage of customers on variable pricing has decreased (as the percentage of customers that have elected price protection has increased), which may adversely impact home heating oil and propane margins for the remainder of fiscal 2018 and fiscal 2019 as the per gallon margins realized from price–protected customers generally are less than variable-priced residential customers.

Cost of Installations and Service

Total installation costs increased by $0.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018, to $17.1 million, largely due to acquisitions, versus $16.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017. Installation costs as a percentage of installation sales for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and the three months ended March 31, 2017 were 86.8% and 86.7%, respectively.

25

---

Service expense increased by $5.3 million, or 12.6%, to $47.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018, or 115.0% of service sales, versus $42.2 million, or 111.5% of service sales, for the three months ended March 31, 2017. This increase, while partially due to acquisitions ($2.1 million), primarily reflected a higher demand for service in the base business and a $3.2 million, or 7.7% increase in base business service costs, attributable in part to the extremely cold weather conditions experienced during late December 2017 and the early part of January 2018 (when temperatures were more than 45% colder than normal), as well as to wage and benefit increases. This extremely cold weather resulted in a significant increase in the demand for service, resulting in additional service calls and a greater number of hours worked at premium labor rates. A portion of the service calls were with customers who have a service contract and, thus, did not result in increased service revenue. We realized a combined gross loss from service and installation of $3.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018 compared to a combined loss of $1.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017. The increase in the net gross profit service loss attributable to acquisitions was $0.8 million. Management views the service and installation department on a combined basis because many overhead functions and direct expenses such as service technician time cannot be separated or precisely allocated to either service or installation billings.

(Increase) Decrease in the Fair Value of Derivative Instruments

During the three months ended March 31, 2018, the change in the fair value of derivative instruments resulted in a $11.6 million charge due to a decrease in the market value for unexpired hedges (a $3.8 million charge), and a $7.8 million charge due to the expiration of certain hedged positions.

During the three months ended March 31, 2017, the change in the fair value of derivative instruments resulted in a $12.4 million charge due to a decrease in the market value for unexpired hedges (a $6.6 million charge) and the expiration of certain hedged positions (a $5.8 million charge).

Delivery and Branch Expenses

For the three months ended March 31, 2018, delivery and branch expenses increased $14.4 million, or 15.6%, to $106.6 million, compared to $92.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017 due to additional costs from acquisitions of $4.7 million and a $10.9 million, or 11.9%, increase in the base business before the impact of the $1.2 million weather hedge credit discussed below. In the base business, home heating oil and propane volume increased by 10.1% year-over-year but operating delivery and branch expenses increased by 10.6%. The extremely cold weather conditions experienced in late December 2017 and early January 2018 not only drove higher demand for service, as mentioned above, but also resulted in a significant increase in direct delivery expense as well as many other branch expenses in the base business. While temperatures were 5.5% warmer than normal for the three months ended March 31, 2018, the extreme weather conditions experienced during late December 2017 and the first part of January 2018 (over 45% colder than normal) resulted in many deliveries made at premium labor rates, increased truck maintenance, and associated issues caused by the extremely cold weather. Office staff across all departments also worked additional overtime hours to handle the surge of customer inquiries regarding the status of their delivery or service call. We estimate that the extremely cold weather conditions in January 2018 resulted in additional expenses of $2.8 million and the increase in volume in the base business resulted in higher costs of $1.6 million. The Company also saw an increase in credit card fees and bad debt expense of $2.2 million tied to the higher cost of product and greater use of credit cards in the base business at the same time, insurance expense rose in part by $1.3 million largely due to an increase in the number of workers compensation and general liability claims in part attributable to the extreme weather conditions. Our fixed costs rose by $1.0 million as we invested in customer service, sales, operations and information technology departments. Normal salary, benefit and other expense changes account for $2.0 million of the increase. Given overall weather conditions in the fiscal second quarter, however, we reduced the amount expected to be paid under our weather hedge contract from $3.1 million (previously recorded) to $1.9 million, resulting in a credit of $1.2 million, which lowered delivery and branch expenses.

Depreciation and Amortization Expenses

For the three months ended March 31, 2018, depreciation and amortization expense increased by $1.0 million, or 14.5%, to $7.7 million, compared to $6.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017 largely due to acquisitions.

General and Administrative Expenses

For the three months ended March 31, 2018, general and administrative expenses increased by $0.7 million, or 12.0%, to $6.2 million compared to $5.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017 largely due to legal and professional expenses and acquisition-related legal expenses. Normal salary and benefit expense increases also impacted the comparison.

26

---

Finance Charge Income

For the three months ended March 31, 2018, finance charge income increased by $0.2 million, or 19.2%, to $1.5 million compared to $1.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017. The increase in the wholesale cost of product and additional volume sold led to an increase in product sales and, thus, higher accounts receivable balances subject to a finance charge.

Interest Expense, Net

For the three months ended March 31, 2018, net interest expense increased by $0.7 million, or 39.2%, to $2.4 million compared to $1.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017 primarily due to $1.1 million of interest expense on our revolving credit facility borrowings to finance higher working capital requirements reflecting the increase in total volume sold of 16.3% and higher per gallon wholesale product cost of 20.0%.

Amortization of Debt Issuance Costs

For the three months ended March 31, 2018, amortization of debt issuance costs was unchanged at $0.3 million compared to the three months ended March 31, 2017.

Income Tax Expense

For the three months ended March 31, 2018, income tax expense increased by $0.7 million to $28.0 million, from $27.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017. On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act was signed into law. The tax reform reduced the Federal statutory income tax rate for corporations from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018 and as a result, the Company’s effective income tax rate decreased from 40.7% for the three months ended March 31, 2017 to 33.8% for the three months ended March 31, 2018.

Net Income

For the three months ended March 31, 2018, net income increased $15.1 million, or 38.0%, to $54.8 million, from $39.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017, due to the increase in Adjusted EBITDA, discussed below, of $16.6 million and the impact of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act on the effective income tax rate.

Adjusted EBITDA

For the three months ended March 31, 2018, Adjusted EBITDA increased by $16.6 million, or 18.8%, to $104.8 million.  The increase in Adjusted EBITDA was primarily a result of the additional volume sold due to colder temperatures, higher home heating oil and propane margins, the additional Adjusted EBITDA provided by acquisitions, and a $1.2 million credit under our weather hedge contract that partially offset higher operating costs in the base business. The extremely cold weather conditions experienced in late December 2017 and early January 2018, which at times was over 45% colder than normal, increased the demand for service, resulted in many deliveries made at premium labor rates, increased truck maintenance and resulted in higher delivery and branch expenses. Office staff across all departments also worked additional overtime hours to handle the surge of customer inquiries regarding the status of their delivery or service call. In addition to these costs and normal increases in salaries, benefits, and other items, delivery and branch expenses were also higher due to an increase in fixed costs, an uptick in insurance expense and, reflecting the increase in sales, greater credit card usage and higher bad debt expense.

27

---

EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered as an alternative to net income (as an indicator of operating performance) or as an alternative to cash flow (as a measure of liquidity or ability to service debt obligations), but provide additional information for evaluating our ability to make the Minimum Quarterly Distribution. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are calculated as follows:

 

 

The method of calculating Adjusted EBITDA may not be consistent with that of other companies, and EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA both have limitations as analytical tools and so should not be viewed in isolation and should be viewed in conjunction with measurements that are computed in accordance with GAAP. Some of the limitations of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are:

28

---

Six Months Ended March 31, 2018

Compared to the Six Months Ended March 31, 2017

Volume

For the six months ended March 31, 2018, retail volume of home heating oil and propane sold increased by 29.8 million gallons, or 11.7%, to 283.5 million gallons, compared to 253.7 million gallons for the six months ended March 31, 2017. For those locations where the Company had existing operations during both periods, which we sometimes refer to as the “base business” (i.e., excluding acquisitions), temperatures (measured on a heating degree day basis) for the six months ended March 31, 2018 were 6.9% colder than the six months ended March 31, 2017 but 5.6% warmer than normal, as reported by NOAA. For the twelve months ended March 31, 2018, net customer attrition for the base business was 2.0%. The impact of fuel conservation, along with any period-to-period differences in delivery scheduling, the timing of accounts added or lost during the fiscal years, equipment efficiency and other volume variances not otherwise described are included in the chart below under the heading “Other.” An analysis of the change in the retail volume of home heating oil and propane sold, which is based on management’s estimates, sampling and other mathematical calculations and certain assumptions, is found below: 

 

 

The following chart sets forth the percentage by volume of total home heating oil sold to residential variable-price customers, residential price-protected customers and commercial/industrial/other customers for the six months ended March 31, 2018 compared to the six months ended March 31, 2017: 

 

 

Volume of other petroleum products increased by 4.8 million gallons, or 8.6%, to 60.7 million gallons for the six months ended March 31, 2018, primarily due to acquisitions (1.7 million) and increased wholesale volume of 1.7 million gallons.

Product Sales

For the six months ended March 31, 2018, product sales increased $197.9 million, or 25.0%, to $989.7 million, compared to $791.8 million for the six months ended March 31, 2017, largely due to an increase in wholesale product costs of $0.2989 per gallon, or 19.0%, and an increase in total volume sold of 11.2%.

Installations and Service

For the six months ended March 31, 2018, installation and service sales increased $6.8 million, or 5.5%, to $131.2 million, compared to $124.4 million for the six months ended March 31, 2017, due to the impact of colder temperatures and acquisitions. Installation sales increased by $1.8 million due to acquisitions and service sales increased by $5.9 million, of which $2.5 million was related to acquisitions.

 

Cost of Product

For the six months ended March 31, 2018, cost of product increased $157.5 million, or 32.2%, to $646.1 million, compared to $488.5 million for the six months ended March 31, 2017, due to an increase in total volume sold of 11.2% and a $0.2989 per gallon, or 19.0%, increase in wholesale product cost.

29

---

Gross Profit — Product

The table below calculates the Company’s per gallon margins and reconciles product gross profit for home heating oil and propane and other petroleum products. We believe the change in home heating oil and propane margins should be evaluated before the effects of increases or decreases in the fair value of derivative instruments, as we believe that realized per gallon margins should not include the impact of non-cash changes in the market value of hedges before the settlement of the underlying transaction. On that basis, home heating oil and propane margins for the six months ended March 31, 2018 increased by $0.0196 per gallon, or 1.7%, to $1.1540 per gallon, from $1.1344 per gallon during the six months ended March 31, 2017. Excluding acquisitions, home heating oil and propane margins increased by $0.0363 per gallon, or 3.2%. Due to differences in product offerings, marketing plans and operating costs, acquisitions may have different home heating oil and propane margin requirements than the base business.

Product sales and cost of product include home heating oil, propane, other petroleum products and liquidated damages billings.

 

 

 

 

For the six months ended March 31, 2018, total product gross profit was $343.6 million, an increase of $40.4 million, or 13.3%, versus the six months ended March 31, 2017, due to an increase in home heating oil and propane volume sold ($33.8 million), an increase in home heating oil and propane margins ($5.5 million), and higher gross profit from other petroleum products of $1.1 million.

Cost of Installations and Service

Total installation costs for the six months ended March 31, 2018 increased by $1.2 million, or 3.0%, to $39.7 million, compared to $38.5 million in installation costs for the six months ended March 31, 2017, largely due to acquisitions. Installation costs as a percentage of installation sales for the six months ended March 31, 2018 and the six months ended March 31, 2017 were 84.4% and 83.4%, respectively.

Service expense increased by $8.1 million, or 9.4%, to $94.5 million for the six months ended March 31, 2018, or 112.3% of service sales, versus $86.4 million, or 110.5% of service sales, for the six months ended March 31, 2017. This increase was due to acquisitions totaling $4.1 million and a $4.0 million, or 4.7% increase in the base business due in part to the extremely cold weather conditions experienced during the last week of December 2017 and the first week of January 2018 (when temperatures were 45% colder than normal), as well as to wage and benefit increases. This extremely cold weather resulted in a significant increase in demand for service and additional hours worked at premium labor rates, as previously discussed. In addition, a portion of these service calls were with customers who have a service contract and, thus, did not result in any additional service revenue. We realized a combined gross profit loss from service and installation of $3.0 million for the six months ended March 31, 2018 compared to a combined gross profit loss of $0.6 million for the six months ended March 31, 2017. The gross profit loss in the base business increased by $1.8 million and acquisitions accounted for a gross profit loss of $1.2 million. Management views the service and installation department on a combined basis because many overhead functions and direct expenses such as service technician time cannot be separated or precisely allocated to either service or installation billings.

30

---

(Increase) Decrease in the Fair Value of Derivative Instruments

During the six months ended March 31, 2018, the change in the fair value of derivative instruments resulted in a $0.2 million charge as an increase in the market value for unexpired hedges (a $2.9 million credit) was more than offset by $3.1 million charge due to the expiration of certain hedged positions.

During the six months ended March 31, 2017, the change in the fair value of derivative instruments resulted in a $3.9 million charge due to a decrease in the market value for unexpired hedges (a $2.8 million charge) and the expiration of certain hedged positions (a $1.1 million charge).

Delivery and Branch Expenses

For the six months ended March 31, 2018, delivery and branch expenses increased $24.5 million, or 14.1%, to $197.8 million, compared to $173.3 million for the six months ended March 31, 2017 due to additional costs from acquisitions of $8.6 million, a $14.0 million, or 8.1%, expense increase in the base business, and a $1.9 million charge related to an amount due under our weather hedge contract, as temperatures were slightly colder than the Payment Threshold. (The weather hedge covers the period from November 1, 2017 to March 31, 2018, taken as a whole.) While expenses in the base business rose by 9.1%, home heating oil and propane sold increased by just 5.1%. The extreme cold weather conditions experienced in late December 2017 and early January 2018, as previously mentioned, not only increased the demand for service calls but also drove an increase in direct delivery expense as well as many other branch expenses. Certain December and January deliveries were made at premium labor rates, and the unusual weather conditions necessitated increased staffing levels for delivery and office personnel to handle the tremendous influx of customer inquiries regarding the status of their delivery or service call. We estimate that the extremely cold weather conditions in January 2018 resulted in unanticipated expenses of $2.8 million and the increase in volume in the base business resulted in higher costs of $2.1 million. The Company also saw an increase in credit card fees and bad debt expense of $2.6 million tied to the higher cost of product and greater use of credit cards. Insurance expense increased in part by $1.9 million largely due to an increase in the number of workers compensation and general liability claims, and our fixed costs increased by $2.3 million as we strengthened our customer service, sales, operations, and information technology departments. Normal salary, benefit and other expense changes account for $2.3 million of the increase.

Depreciation and Amortization Expenses

For the six months ended March 31, 2018, depreciation and amortization expense increased by $2.2 million, or 16.2%, to $15.4 million, compared to $13.3 million for the six months ended March 31, 2017 largely due to acquisitions.

General and Administrative Expenses

For the six months ended March 31, 2018, general and administrative expenses increased by $1.0 million, or 8.1%, to $12.9 million compared to $11.9 million, for the six months ended March 31, 2017 largely due to legal expenses associated with the change in federal income tax classification and acquisition related legal expenses. Normal salary and benefit expense increases also impacted the year-over-year comparison.

Finance Charge Income

For the six months ended March 31, 2018, finance charge income increased by $0.3 million, or 15.9%, to $2.3 million compared to $2.0 million for the six months ended March 31, 2017. The increase in the wholesale cost of product and higher volumes led to an increase in product sales and, thus, accounts receivable balances subject to a finance charge.

Interest Expense, Net

For the six months ended March 31, 2018, net interest expense increased by $1.0 million, or 27.8%, to 4.5 million compared to $3.5 million for the six months ended March 31, 2017 primarily due to $1.4 million of interest expense on our revolving credit facility borrowings to finance higher working capital requirements reflecting the increase in total volume sold of 11.2% and higher per gallon wholesale product costs of 19.0%.

Amortization of Debt Issuance Costs

For the six months ended March 31, 2018, amortization of debt issuance costs was unchanged at $0.6 million compared to the six months ended March 31, 2017.

Income Tax Expense

For the six months ended March 31, 2018, income tax expense decreased by $13.7 million to $26.5 million, from $40.2 million for the six months ended March 31, 2017. The decrease was primarily due to an $11.2 million tax benefit to reflect the impact of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act signed into law on December 22, 2017. The tax reform reduced the federal statutory income tax rate for corporations from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018, and, therefore, the Company’s net deferred tax liability will be realized at a

31

---

lower statutory tax rate than originally recorded, resulting in a tax benefit to the Company. Excluding the impact of this net deferred tax liability related tax benefit, our effective income tax rate decreased from 40.9% for the six months ending March 31, 2017 to 33.9% for the six months ending March 31, 2018, primarily due to the lower enacted federal statutory tax.

Net Income

For the six months ended March 31, 2018, net income increased $27.0 million, or 46.5%, to $85.0 million, from $58.0 million for the six months ended March 31, 2017, primarily due to the increase in Adjusted EBITDA, discussed below, of $12.7 million and a decrease in income tax expense of $13.7 million as a result of the aforementioned Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.

Adjusted EBITDA

For the six months ended March 31, 2018, Adjusted EBITDA increased by $12.7 million, or 10.7%, to $132.2 million.  The increase in Adjusted EBITDA was primarily the result of the additional volume sold in the base business due largely to the impact of colder temperatures, higher home heating oil and propane margins, the additional Adjusted EBITDA provided by acquisitions that was partially offset by higher operating costs in the base business and a $1.9 million charge related to an amount due under our weather hedge contract because temperatures were colder than the Payment Threshold. The extreme cold weather conditions experienced in late December 2017 and early January 2018, as previously mentioned, not only increased the demand for service calls but also drove an increase in direct delivery expense as well as many other branch expenses. Certain December and January deliveries were made at premium labor rates, and the unusual weather conditions necessitated increased staffing levels for delivery and office personnel to handle the tremendous influx of customer inquiries regarding the status of their delivery or service call. In addition to these costs and normal increases in salaries, benefits, and other items, delivery and branch expenses were also higher due to an increase in fixed costs, an uptick in insurance expense and, reflecting the increase in sales, greater credit card usage and higher bad debt expense.

EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered as an alternative to net income (as an indicator of operating performance) or as an alternative to cash flow (as a measure of liquidity or ability to service debt obligations), but provide additional information for evaluating our ability to make the Minimum Quarterly Distribution. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are calculated as follows:

 

 

 

32

---

 

 

 

 

The method of calculating Adjusted EBITDA may not be consistent with that of other companies, and EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA both have limitations as analytical tools and so should not be viewed in isolation but in conjunction with measurements that are computed in accordance with GAAP. Some of the limitations of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are:

 

 

 

 

DISCUSSION OF CASH FLOWS

We use the indirect method to prepare our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. Under this method, we reconcile net income to cash flows provided by operating activities by adjusting net income for those items that impact net income but do not result in actual cash receipts or payment during the period.

Operating Activities

Due to the seasonal nature of our business, cash is generally used in operations during the winter (our first and second fiscal quarters) as we require additional working capital to support the high volume of sales during this period, and cash is generally provided by operating activities during the spring and summer (our third and fourth quarters) when customer payments exceed the cost of deliveries.

During the six months ended March 31, 2018, cash used in operating activities increased $24.4 million to $60.3 million, compared to $35.9 million of cash used in operating activities during the six months ended March 31, 2017. This reflects a $13.7 million increase in cash generated from operations prior to consideration of income tax and a $3.4 million decrease in taxes paid, which was more than offset by an unfavorable change in accounts receivable of $47.2 million (including customer credit balances). The impact of colder weather and an increase in per gallon product costs drove an increase in accounts receivable.

Investing Activities

Our capital expenditures for the six months ended March 31, 2018 totaled $6.6 million, as we invested in computer hardware and software ($1.1 million), refurbished certain physical plants ($0.6 million), expanded our propane operations ($1.7 million) and made additions to our fleet and other equipment ($3.2 million). We completed two acquisitions for approximately $0.3 million; $0.2 million in cash and $0.1 million of deferred liabilities.

In October 2017, we deposited $34.2 million of cash into an irrevocable trust to secure certain liabilities for our captive insurance company and, several days later, $36.6 million of letters of credit were cancelled that previously had secured these liabilities. The cash deposited into the trust is shown on our balance sheet as Captive Insurance Collateral and, correspondingly, reduced cash on our balance sheet.  We believe that the investment into the irrevocable trust will lower our letter of credit fees, increase interest income on invested cash balances, and provide us with certain tax advantages attributable to a captive insurance company.

Our capital expenditures for the six months ended March 31, 2017 totaled $7.8 million, as we invested in computer hardware and software ($2.8 million), refurbished certain physical plants ($1.7 million), expanded our propane operations ($1.6 million) and made additions to our fleet and other equipment ($1.7 million). We completed four acquisitions for approximately $9.2 million; $7.7 million in cash and $1.5 million of deferred liabilities (including $0.6 million of contingent consideration). The aggregate gross purchase price for these transactions was allocated $3.9 million to intangible assets, $1.1 million to goodwill, $4.3 million to fixed assets and $(0.1) million to working capital.

33

---

Financing Activities

During the six months ended March 31, 2018 we paid distributions of $12.3 million to our Common Unit holders and $0.3 million to our General Partner unit holders (including $0.3 million of incentive distributions as provided in our Partnership Agreement). We borrowed $160.1 million under our revolving credit to finance our working capital and subsequently repaid $45.1 million. We also repaid $5.0 million of our term loan. In addition, we repurchased 1.3 million common units for $12.0 million in connection with our unit repurchase plan.

During the six months ended March 31, 2017, we paid distributions of $11.4 million to our Common Unit holders and $0.3 million to our General Partner unit holders (including $0.2 million of incentive distributions as provided in our Partnership Agreement) and repaid $11.2 million of our term loan.

FINANCING AND SOURCES OF LIQUIDITY

Liquidity and Capital Resources Comparatives

Our primary uses of liquidity are to provide funds for our working capital, capital expenditures, distributions on our units, acquisitions and unit repurchases. Our ability to provide funds for such uses depends on our future performance, which will be subject to prevailing economic, financial, business and weather conditions, the ability to pass on the full impact of high product costs to customers, the effects of high net customer attrition, conservation and other factors. Capital requirements, at least in the near term, are expected to be provided by cash flows from operating activities, cash on hand as of March 31, 2018 ($35.4 million) or a combination thereof. To the extent future capital requirements exceed cash on hand plus cash flows from operating activities, we anticipate that working capital will be financed by our revolving credit facility, as discussed below, and reduced from subsequent seasonal reductions in inventory and accounts receivable. If necessary, we may pursue an increase of our term loan or an increase in our borrowing base for our revolving credit facility with our lenders.  As of March 31, 2018, we had $115.0 million borrowings under our revolving credit facility, $71.3 million under our term loan and $7.1 million in letters of credit outstanding.

Under the terms of the third amended and restated credit agreement, we must maintain at all times Availability (borrowing base less amounts borrowed and letters of credit issued) of 12.5% of the maximum facility size and a fixed charge coverage ratio of not less than 1.1. We must also maintain a senior secured leverage ratio that at any time cannot be more than 3.0 as calculated during the quarters ending June or September, and at any time no more than 4.5 as calculated during the quarters ending December or March. As of March 31, 2018, Availability, as defined in the credit agreement, was $177.9 million and we were in compliance with the fixed charge coverage ratio and senior secured leverage ratio.

Maintenance capital expenditures for the remainder of fiscal 2018 are estimated to be approximately $4.0 million to $6.0 million, excluding the capital requirements for leased fleet. In addition, we plan to invest an additional $1.0 million in our propane operations. Distributions for the balance of fiscal 2018, at the current quarterly level of $0.1175 per unit, would result in an aggregate of approximately $12.7 million to Common Unit holders, $0.4 million to our General Partner (including $0.3 million of incentive distribution as provided for in our Partnership Agreement) and $0.3 million to management pursuant to the management incentive compensation plan which provides for certain members of management to receive incentive distributions that would otherwise be payable to the General Partner. Under the terms of our credit facility, our term loan is repayable in quarterly payments of $2.5 million, and, depending on our fiscal 2018 results, we may be required to make an additional payment (see Note 9 — Long-Term Debt and Bank Facility Borrowings). In addition, we intend to continue to repurchase Common Units pursuant to our unit repurchase plan, as amended from time to time, and seek attractive acquisition opportunities within the Availability constraints of our revolving credit facility and funding resources. (From April 1, 2018 to April 30, 2018 we repurchased 0.6 million common units for $6.1 million and completed one acquisition for an aggregate amount of approximately $16.5 million; $16.1 million in cash and $0.4 million of deferred liabilities.)

Contractual Obligations and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

There has been no material change to Contractual Obligations and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements since our September 30, 2017 Form 10-K disclosure and therefore, the table has not been included in this Form 10-Q.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

The following new accounting standards were recently adopted by the Company, and are more fully described in Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements, of the consolidated financial statements:

34

---

The following new accounting standards are currently being evaluated by the Company, and are more fully described in Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements, of the consolidated financial statements:

 

35

---

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

We are exposed to interest rate risk primarily through our bank credit facilities. We utilize these borrowings to meet our working capital needs.

At March 31, 2018, we had outstanding borrowings totaling $186.3 million, which are subject to variable interest rates under our credit agreement. In the event that interest rates associated with this facility were to increase 100 basis points, the after tax impact on annual future cash flows would be a decrease of $1.3 million.

We regularly use derivative financial instruments to manage our exposure to market risk related to changes in the current and future market price of home heating oil and vehicle fuels. The value of market sensitive derivative instruments is subject to change as a result of movements in market prices. Sensitivity analysis is a technique used to evaluate the impact of hypothetical market value changes. Based on a hypothetical ten percent increase in the cost of product at March 31, 2018, the potential impact on our hedging activity would be to increase the fair market value of these outstanding derivatives by $6.0 million to a fair market value of $13.0 million; and conversely a hypothetical ten percent decrease in the cost of product would decrease the fair market value of these outstanding derivatives by $9.9 million to a negative fair market value of $2.9 million.

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures

a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures

The General Partner’s chief executive officer and its chief financial officer evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as that term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of March 31, 2018. Based on that evaluation, such chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of March 31, 2018 at the reasonable level of assurance. For purposes of Rule 13a-15(e), the term disclosure controls and procedures means controls and other procedures of an issuer that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Act (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuer’s management, including its chief executive and chief financial officer, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

b) Change in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

No change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting occurred during the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

c) Other

The General Partner and the Company believe that a controls system, no matter how well designed and operated, cannot provide absolute assurance that the objectives of the controls system are met, and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within a Company have been detected. Therefore, a control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide such reasonable assurances of achieving our desired control objectives, and the chief executive officer and chief financial officer of our general partner have concluded, as of March 31, 2018, that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective in achieving that level of reasonable assurance.

 

36

---

PART II OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings

On April 18, 2017, a civil action was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, entitled M. Norman Donnenfeld v. Petro, Inc., Civil Action Number 2:17-cv-2310-JFB-SIL, against Petro, Inc. By amended complaint filed on August 15, 2017, the Plaintiff alleges he did not receive expected contractual benefits under his protected price plan contract when oil prices fell and asserts various claims for relief including breach of contract, violation of the New York General Business Law and fraud. The Plaintiff also seeks to have a class certified of similarly situated Petro customers who entered into protected price plan contracts and were denied the same contractual benefits. No class has yet been certified in this action. The Plaintiff seeks compensatory, punitive and other damages in unspecified amounts. On September 15, 2017, Petro filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint as time-barred and for failure to state a cause of action. The motion was argued on January 18, 2018 and a decision is awaited. The Company believes the allegations lack merit and intends to vigorously defend the action; at this time we cannot assess the potential outcome or materiality of this matter.

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

In addition to the other information set forth in this Report, investors should carefully review and consider the information regarding certain factors which could materially affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows set forth in Part I Item 1A. “Risk Factors” in our Fiscal 2017 Form 10-K. We may disclose changes to such factors or disclose additional factors from time to time in our future filings with the SEC.

Item 2.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Note 3 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements concerning the Company’s repurchase of common units during the three months ended March 31, 2018 is incorporated into this Item 2 by reference.

 

37

---

Item 6.

Exhibits

 

 

 

38

---

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrants have duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf of the undersigned thereunto duly authorized:

 

 

 

39