001-34133 | 03-0606749 |
(Commission File Number) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
• | The Company has continued to pursue a variety of original equipment manufacturers and companies in their supply chain in connection with its ASF sapphire growth furnace business. The Company’s strategy is not dependent on a particular original equipment manufacturer. |
• | The Company does not believe the change in its senior management, which was previously reported on the Company’s Current Report on Form 8‑K filed on August 10, 2015, will have a material adverse effect on its ability to sell its ASF sapphire growth furnaces (“ASFs”), to the extent there is any demand for such ASFs. |
• | The Company owns its headquarters building in Merrimack, New Hampshire, and is evaluating opportunities to monetize such building. |
• | Recent cost reductions have decreased the Company’s overhead costs by approximately $25 million, of which the majority is related to decreased headcount. Such cost savings are more particularly described in the cash expense reductions summary furnished as Exhibit 99.1 hereto. |
• | The estimated scrap metal value of the Company’s ASFs is less than $2,000 per furnace. |
• | During the Company’s third calendar quarter in 2015, the costs of storing and relocating the Company’s ASFs were expected to be approximately $5.2 million in 2016, of which $0.8 million related to relocation costs and $4.4 million related to warehousing costs, and the Company did not expect to incur relocation costs after 2016. These statements represent forecasts as of the time they were made, and have not been revised to reflect any changes that may have taken place between such time and the filing of this Current Report on Form 8-K. In addition, as a result of the Amended Terms of Resolution of Apple Claims and Mesa Lease Issues dated November 26, 2015 (the “Amended Settlement Agreement”), the Company believes that these forecasts are no longer material. The Amended Settlement Agreement is more particularly described in the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 2, 2015. |
• | The Company is not aware of any market demand for using ASFs for any purpose other than making sapphire. |
• | The Company plans to sell all of the assets in its Mesa facility other than its ASFs (the “non-core assets”) by its first quarter in 2016. As of October 30, 2015, the Company reduced its estimate of expected proceeds from such sale from $30 million, as forecast in the Company’s Current Report on Form 8‑K filed on July 7, 2015 (the “July 7, 2015 Form 8‑K”), to $18 million, which reduction is primarily attributable to (i) a reduction in the expected proceeds from the sale of the Company’s Meyer Berger equipment of at least $5 million resulting from the withdrawal of an offer the Company was unable to accept due to New Hampshire bankruptcy court rules and (ii) a reduction in expected proceeds from raw sapphire materials of at least $4 million due to current market conditions and concerns regarding melt stock sourced from a certain Chinese supplier. In addition, the projections in the July 7, 2015 Form 8‑K excluded the impact of the May 26, 2015 fire that took place at the Mesa facility (the “Mesa fire”), as the Company expected at the time that any impact of the fire on proceeds from the sale of the non-core assets would be offset by insurance proceeds. While the Company’s discussions with the applicable insurance provider are ongoing, there is no guaranty that such insurance proceeds will be sufficient to completely offset the losses caused by such fire. The Company intends, and continues to explore opportunities, to monetize its non-core assets prior to vacating the Mesa facility in December 2015, though the Company’s forecasts for September 2015, reported in the July 7, 2015 Form 8‑K, reflect the sale of only some of such assets. Any non-core assets that have not been monetized prior to vacating the Mesa Facility will be abandoned or moved out of the Mesa Facility. |
• | The Debtors remain subject to unsecured claims in the following estimated amounts: |
GT Advanced Technologies Inc.: | $435-$620 million |
GTAT Corporation: | $90-$270 million |
GT Advanced Technologies Limited: | $70-$100 million |
Others: | Immaterial |
Total: | $595-$990 million |
• | Of the $60-$80 million estimated net orderly liquidation value of the Company’s non-core assets reported in the Company’s Current Report on Form 8‑K filed on March 3, 2015, approximately $25 million gross orderly liquidation value has been sold, damaged in the Mesa fire or used in the ordinary course of business. In addition, as of October 30, 2015, approximately $18 million gross orderly liquidation value was forecast to be sold by December 15, 2015. The remaining non-core assets were estimated to have a $30-$35 million net orderly liquidation value, of which approximately $9 million is located at the Mesa facility and includes primarily sapphire melt stock and diamond wire saws. |
• | As of October 2, 2015, the Company had received $926,000 of proceeds from non-core asset sales since the closing of the DIP Credit Facility on July 27, 2015. |
• | The Company has been notified by the IRS that it wishes to conduct an audit of the Company’s 2013 and 2014 tax years. The Company is not aware of any regulation or procedure that would cause a delay in receiving the $24 million tax refund the Company expects to receive in the near future, nor has the Company been advised by the IRS that such refund will not be processed before year end. However, because of an unusual combination of circumstances, including the Company’s Chapter 11 Case, the impact of the audit on the timing of the refund, if any, is currently unknown. Given the losses incurred by the Company in 2013 and 2014, the Company does not believe the audit will have any effect on the amount of the refund it is ultimately entitled to. The Company believes that all tax positions taken in its tax returns filed for 2013 and 2014 were appropriate and reasonable. |
• | Redacted version of the September 2015 business plan update presentation (furnished as Exhibit 99.2 hereto); |
• | August 2015 Summary Conclusions with Respect to Certain Inter-Debtor Matters (furnished as Exhibit 99.3 hereto); |
• | October 2015 Presentation regarding the latest offer in connection with the non-core assets (furnished as Exhibit 99.4 hereto); |
• | Redacted version of the October 2015 business plan update presentation (furnished as Exhibit 99.5 hereto); |
• | November 2015 13-week statement of actual and forecast cash flows (furnished as Exhibit 99.6 hereto); |
• | March 2015 presentation regarding the Waaree Corporation independent contractor agreement (furnished as Exhibit 99.7 hereto); |
• | Analysis of ASF Throughput, dated September 24, 2015 (furnished as Exhibit 99.8 hereto); and |
Exhibit No. | Description |
99.1 | Cash Expense Reductions |
99.2 | September 2015 Business Plan Update Presentation (redacted) |
99.3 | August 2015 Summary Conclusions with Respect to Certain Inter-Debtor Matters |
99.4 | October 2015 Presentation Regarding Offer for Non-Core Assets |
99.5 | October 2015 Business Plan Update Presentation (redacted) |
99.6 | November 2015 13-Week Statement of Actual and Forecast Cash Flows |
99.7 | March 2015 Presentation Regarding the Waaree Corporation Independent Contractor Agreement |
99.8 | September 24, 2015 Analysis of ASF Throughput |
By: | Hoil Kim |
Its: | Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer, General Counsel and Secretary |
Exhibit No. | Description |
99.1 | Cash Expense Reductions |
99.2 | September 2015 Business Plan Update Presentation (redacted) |
99.3 | August 2015 Summary Conclusions with Respect to Certain Inter-Debtor Matters |
99.4 | October 2015 Presentation Regarding Offer for Non-Core Assets |
99.5 | October 2015 Business Plan Update Presentation (redacted) |
99.6 | November 2015 13-Week Statement of Actual and Forecast Cash Flows |
99.7 | March 2015 Presentation Regarding the Waaree Corporation Independent Contractor Agreement |
99.8 | September 24, 2015 Analysis of ASF Throughput |