Form 10-Q
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM-10Q
(Mark One)
x |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002
OR
¨ |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period
from to
Commission file number 33-48887
HOLLYWOOD CASINO CORPORATION HWCCTUNICA, INC.
(Exact name of each Registrant
as specified in its charter)
Delaware Texas
|
|
75-2352412 75-2513808 |
(States or other jurisdictions of incorporation or organization) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.s) |
Two Galleria Tower, Suite 2200 13455 Noel Road, LB 48 Dallas, Texas |
|
75240 |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
(Zip Code) |
(Registrants telephone number, including area code) (972) 392-7777
(Not Applicable)
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report.)
Indicate by check mark whether each of the Registrants (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that each of the Registrants was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Registrant
|
|
Class
|
|
Outstanding at November 11, 2002
|
Hollywood Casino Corporation HWCCTunica, Inc. |
|
Common Stock, $.0001 par value Common Stock, $.01 par value |
|
25,725,287 Shares 1,000
Shares |
HOLLYWOOD CASINO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
PART I: FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
Introductory Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements
Hollywood Casino Corporation (HCC or the Company) develops, owns and
operates distinctively themed casino entertainment facilities under the service mark Hollywood Casino®. Through its subsidiaries, HCC currently owns and operates a dockside casino and entertainment facility in Aurora, Illinois approximately 35 miles west of downtown Chicago (the Aurora Casino); a casino, hotel
and entertainment complex in Tunica County, Mississippi located approximately 30 miles south of Memphis, Tennessee (the Tunica Casino) and a destination gaming resort located in Shreveport, Louisiana, approximately 180 miles east of
Dallas, Texas (the Shreveport Casino). Each of the Companys facilities features its unique Hollywood theme, which incorporates the excitement and glamour of the motion picture industry by utilizing designs inspired by famous
movies, displays of motion picture memorabilia and movie themed gaming, entertainment and dining areas. Approximately 49% of HCCs outstanding common shares are listed and traded on the American Stock Exchange under the symbol HWD.
The remaining outstanding HCC common shares are owned by Jack E. Pratt, Edward T. Pratt, Jr., William D. Pratt, Edward T. Pratt III and by certain general partnerships and trusts controlled by the Pratts and by other family members (collectively,
the Pratt Family).
HCC owns all of the outstanding common stock of Hollywood Casino - Aurora, Inc.
(HCA), HWCC - Tunica, Inc. (HCT), HWCC - Louisiana, Inc. (HCL) and HWCC - Shreveport, Inc. (Shreveport Management). HCA is an Illinois corporation organized by the Pratt family during 1990 which owns
and operates the Aurora Casino. HCT is a Texas corporation formed by HCC during 1993 to acquire and complete the Tunica Casino. HCL is a Louisiana corporation formed by HCC in 1993 to pursue gaming opportunities in Louisiana. HCL owns the
partnership (the Shreveport Partnership) which has an effective 100% ownership interest in the Shreveport Casino. HCCs joint venture partner holds a residual interest in the event that the Shreveport Casino is ever sold
amounting to 10% plus any capital contributions made by the joint venture partner to the Shreveport Partnership or otherwise credited to their account. The joint venture partner also receives an amount equal to 1% of complex net
revenues, as defined, of the Shreveport Casino. The joint venture partners interest is shown as minority interest on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Shreveport Management is a Louisiana corporation formed by HCC in
1997 which holds the management contract for the Shreveport Casino.
During May 1999, HCC issued $310,000,000 of
11.25% Senior Secured Notes due May 1, 2007 and $50,000,000 of floating rate Senior Secured Notes due May 1, 2006 (collectively, the Senior Secured Notes). The Senior Secured Notes are unconditionally guaranteed on a senior secured basis
by HCT, Shreveport Management and by certain future subsidiaries of HCC. The Senior Secured Notes are secured by, among other things, (1) substantially all of the assets of HCT, (2) a limited lien on substantially all of the assets of HCA and (3) a
pledge of the capital stock of certain subsidiaries of HCC including HCA and HCT. Accordingly, the financial statements of HCA and HCT are also included herein. Shreveport Managements only source of revenues is management fees earned from the
Shreveport Casino and its only expense is a services fee paid to HCC of not less than 90% of the management fees it earns from the Shreveport Casino. Shreveport Management has no significant operations, assets or liabilities; accordingly, separate
financial statements are not included herein because management has determined that such information is not material to investors. HCL has been designated an Unrestricted Subsidiary of HCC and the operations of the Shreveport Casino,
other than management fees paid to Shreveport Management, do not provide credit support for the Senior Secured Notes.
2
Proceeds of the debt offering were used to refinance previously outstanding debt,
to fund a portion of HCCs equity investment in the Shreveport Casino and, during October 1999, to purchase and terminate the management and consulting agreements on the Aurora Casino and Tunica Casino. The Company also used proceeds from the
debt offering to partially fund the expansion of the Aurora Casinos operating facilities.
During August
1999, the Shreveport Partnership issued $150,000,000 of 13% First Mortgage Notes, with contingent interest, which are non-recourse to HCC. During June 2001, the Shreveport Partnership issued $39,000,000 of 13% Senior Secured Notes, with contingent
interest, which are also non-recourse to HCC. Because the partnership is effectively owned and controlled by HCL, the financial statements of the partnership, including its debt obligations, are included in the accompanying consolidated financial
statements of HCC.
The principal executive offices of HCC are located at Two Galleria Tower, Suite 2200, 13455
Noel Road, Dallas, Texas 75240, telephone (972) 392-7777.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements and
financial statements as of September 30, 2002 and for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2002 and 2001 have been prepared by HCC, HCA and HCT without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission. In the opinion of management, these consolidated financial statements and financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the consolidated financial position of
HCC and HCT and the financial position of HCA as of September 30, 2002, the results of their operations for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2002 and 2001 and their cash flows for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2002
and 2001.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in HCC and
HCTs 2001 Amended Annual Report on Form 10-K/A. The Form 10-K/A and other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission are available at HCCs website (www.hollywoodcasino.com) as soon as reasonably practicable after
such reports are electronically filed with the Commission.
Historically, all three of the Companys casino
properties have experienced some degree of seasonality. Consequently, the results of operations for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2002 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results to be reported for the full year.
The Company, Penn National Gaming, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation (Penn National), and P
Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Penn National, entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the Merger Agreement), dated as of August 7, 2002, pursuant to which, and subject to the conditions
thereof, the Company will become a wholly owned subsidiary of Penn National through the merger of P Acquisition Corp. with and into the Company. Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, stockholders of the Company will receive cash in the amount of
$12.75 per share at closing. In connection with the Merger Agreement, Penn National, the Company and certain stockholders of the Company (who collectively control at least 50.3% of the Companys outstanding shares) executed and delivered
Stockholder Agreements, pursuant to which those stockholders have, among other things, covenanted to vote in favor of the adoption of and otherwise to support the Merger Agreement. Consequently, subject to the terms and conditions of the Merger
Agreement and Stockholder Agreements, holders of a majority of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of the Company eligible to vote have agreed to vote in favor of the merger, assuring stockholder approval.
3
INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS REPORT
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Hollywood Casino Corporation:
We have reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet of
Hollywood Casino Corporation and subsidiaries as of September 30, 2002, the related condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2002 and 2001 and cash flows for the nine month periods
ended September 30, 2002 and 2001. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management.
We conducted our
reviews in accordance with standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial data and of making inquiries of
persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, the objective of which is the expression of
an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.
Based on our reviews, we
are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to such condensed consolidated financial statements for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We have previously audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, the consolidated balance sheet of Hollywood
Casino Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders deficit and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated March 19, 2002, we
expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2001 is fairly stated, in all material respects, in
relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE
LLP
Dallas, Texas
November 7, 2002
4
HOLLYWOOD CASINO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
September 30, 2002
|
|
|
December 31, 2001
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
137,845,000 |
|
|
$ |
131,849,000 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
80,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables, net of allowances of $3,254,000 and $3,571,000, respectively |
|
|
6,528,000 |
|
|
|
5,232,000 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
3,379,000 |
|
|
|
3,305,000 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
2,253,000 |
|
|
|
2,233,000 |
|
Refundable deposits and other current assets |
|
|
3,962,000 |
|
|
|
3,525,000 |
|
Federal income taxes receivable |
|
|
2,996,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Due from affiliates, net of valuation allowances |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,962,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
158,043,000 |
|
|
|
158,106,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and Equipment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land and improvements |
|
|
13,290,000 |
|
|
|
9,640,000 |
|
Buildings and improvements |
|
|
230,792,000 |
|
|
|
224,897,000 |
|
Riverboats and barges |
|
|
101,300,000 |
|
|
|
89,836,000 |
|
Operating equipment |
|
|
124,084,000 |
|
|
|
142,224,000 |
|
Construction in progress |
|
|
3,894,000 |
|
|
|
47,904,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
473,360,000 |
|
|
|
514,501,000 |
|
Lessaccumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(105,893,000 |
) |
|
|
(153,769,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net property and equipment |
|
|
367,467,000 |
|
|
|
360,732,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred financing costs |
|
|
11,494,000 |
|
|
|
13,535,000 |
|
Land rights |
|
|
6,486,000 |
|
|
|
6,639,000 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
9,170,000 |
|
|
|
14,385,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other assets |
|
|
27,150,000 |
|
|
|
34,559,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
552,660,000 |
|
|
$ |
553,397,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying introductory notes
and notes to consolidated financial statements
are an integral part of these consolidated balance sheets.
5
HOLLYWOOD CASINO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
September 30, 2002
|
|
|
December 31, 2001
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS DEFICIT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt and capital lease obligations |
|
$ |
1,751,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,056,000 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
15,040,000 |
|
|
|
19,520,000 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and wages |
|
|
8,051,000 |
|
|
|
9,913,000 |
|
Interest |
|
|
22,116,000 |
|
|
|
17,570,000 |
|
Gaming and other taxes |
|
|
12,965,000 |
|
|
|
3,587,000 |
|
Insurance |
|
|
4,723,000 |
|
|
|
4,588,000 |
|
Other |
|
|
9,388,000 |
|
|
|
8,409,000 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
3,405,000 |
|
|
|
4,571,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
77,439,000 |
|
|
|
70,214,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Debt |
|
|
550,287,000 |
|
|
|
550,950,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Lease Obligations |
|
|
16,036,000 |
|
|
|
16,554,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Noncurrent Liabilities |
|
|
8,546,000 |
|
|
|
7,380,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority Interest |
|
|
2,116,000 |
|
|
|
2,111,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders Deficit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A common stock, $.0001 par value per share; 50,000,000 shares authorized; 25,725,000 and 25,334,000 shares issued
and outstanding, respectively, net of 185,000 and 44,000 treasury shares at par, respectively |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
Class B, non-voting, $.0001 par value per share; 10,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
217,118,000 |
|
|
|
217,727,000 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(318,885,000 |
) |
|
|
(311,542,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders deficit |
|
|
(101,764,000 |
) |
|
|
(93,812,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
552,660,000 |
|
|
$ |
553,397,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying introductory notes
and notes to consolidated financial statements
are an integral part of these consolidated balance sheets.
6
HOLLYWOOD CASINO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2001
|
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Casino |
|
$ |
137,258,000 |
|
|
$ |
122,893,000 |
|
Rooms |
|
|
4,097,000 |
|
|
|
4,314,000 |
|
Food and beverage |
|
|
14,608,000 |
|
|
|
14,772,000 |
|
Other |
|
|
2,505,000 |
|
|
|
1,969,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
158,468,000 |
|
|
|
143,948,000 |
|
Lesspromotional allowances |
|
|
(28,466,000 |
) |
|
|
(27,437,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues |
|
|
130,002,000 |
|
|
|
116,511,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Casino |
|
|
92,721,000 |
|
|
|
79,298,000 |
|
Rooms |
|
|
804,000 |
|
|
|
854,000 |
|
Food and beverage |
|
|
3,966,000 |
|
|
|
4,142,000 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,432,000 |
|
|
|
1,089,000 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
8,939,000 |
|
|
|
7,250,000 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
8,178,000 |
|
|
|
13,641,000 |
|
Development |
|
|
9,000 |
|
|
|
149,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
116,049,000 |
|
|
|
106,423,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
13,953,000 |
|
|
|
10,088,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-operating income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
353,000 |
|
|
|
1,023,000 |
|
Interest expense, net of capitalized interest of $55,000 and $328,000, respectively |
|
|
(16,931,000 |
) |
|
|
(16,130,000 |
) |
Equity in losses of unconsolidated affiliates |
|
|
(92,000 |
) |
|
|
(43,000 |
) |
(Loss) gain on disposal of assets |
|
|
(176,000 |
) |
|
|
9,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-operating expense, net |
|
|
(16,846,000 |
) |
|
|
(15,141,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes and other item |
|
|
(2,893,000 |
) |
|
|
(5,053,000 |
) |
Income tax (provision) benefit |
|
|
(6,396,000 |
) |
|
|
2,513,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before other item |
|
|
(9,289,000 |
) |
|
|
(2,540,000 |
) |
Minority interest in Hollywood Casino Shreveport (Note 1) |
|
|
(367,000 |
) |
|
|
(372,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(9,656,000 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,912,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted net loss per common share |
|
$ |
(.38 |
) |
|
$ |
(.12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying introductory notes and notes to consolidated financial
statements are an integral part of these consolidated statements.
7
HOLLYWOOD CASINO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2001
|
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Casino |
|
$ |
396,933,000 |
|
|
$ |
365,418,000 |
|
Rooms |
|
|
12,037,000 |
|
|
|
11,690,000 |
|
Food and beverage |
|
|
41,819,000 |
|
|
|
44,224,000 |
|
Other |
|
|
6,244,000 |
|
|
|
6,546,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
457,033,000 |
|
|
|
427,878,000 |
|
Lesspromotional allowances |
|
|
(80,220,000 |
) |
|
|
(81,543,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues |
|
|
376,813,000 |
|
|
|
346,335,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Casino |
|
|
251,606,000 |
|
|
|
246,942,000 |
|
Rooms |
|
|
2,634,000 |
|
|
|
2,548,000 |
|
Food and beverage |
|
|
12,030,000 |
|
|
|
14,039,000 |
|
Other |
|
|
3,839,000 |
|
|
|
4,528,000 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
26,055,000 |
|
|
|
24,956,000 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
33,239,000 |
|
|
|
36,797,000 |
|
Development |
|
|
69,000 |
|
|
|
459,000 |
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
195,000 |
|
|
|
843,000 |
|
Loss on affiliate obligations |
|
|
800,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Executive compensation adjustment |
|
|
(709,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
329,758,000 |
|
|
|
331,112,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
47,055,000 |
|
|
|
15,223,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-operating income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
1,073,000 |
|
|
|
3,969,000 |
|
Interest expense, net of capitalized interest of $1,323,000 and $466,000, respectively |
|
|
(50,139,000 |
) |
|
|
(50,506,000 |
) |
Equity in losses of unconsolidated affiliates |
|
|
(161,000 |
) |
|
|
(130,000 |
) |
Write off investment in unconsolidated affiliate |
|
|
(313,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Loss on disposal of assets |
|
|
(255,000 |
) |
|
|
(55,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-operating expense, net |
|
|
(49,795,000 |
) |
|
|
(46,722,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes and other item |
|
|
(2,740,000 |
) |
|
|
(31,499,000 |
) |
Income tax (provision) benefit |
|
|
(3,490,000 |
) |
|
|
1,996,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before other item |
|
|
(6,230,000 |
) |
|
|
(29,503,000 |
) |
Minority interest in Hollywood Casino Shreveport (Note 1) |
|
|
(1,113,000 |
) |
|
|
(1,109,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(7,343,000 |
) |
|
$ |
(30,612,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted net loss per common share |
|
$ |
(.29 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.22 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying introductory notes and notes to consolidated financial
statements are an integral part of these consolidated statements.
8
HOLLYWOOD CASINO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2001
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(7,343,000 |
) |
|
$ |
(30,612,000 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization, including accretion of debt discount and amortization of premium |
|
|
35,149,000 |
|
|
|
38,954,000 |
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
195,000 |
|
|
|
843,000 |
|
Loss on affiliate obligations |
|
|
800,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on disposal of assets |
|
|
255,000 |
|
|
|
55,000 |
|
Minority interest in Hollywood Casino Shreveport |
|
|
1,113,000 |
|
|
|
1,109,000 |
|
Equity in losses of unconsolidated affiliates |
|
|
161,000 |
|
|
|
130,000 |
|
Write off investment in unconsolidated affiliate |
|
|
313,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for doubtful accounts |
|
|
281,000 |
|
|
|
2,197,000 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
5,757,000 |
|
|
|
(489,000 |
) |
Increase in accounts receivable |
|
|
(1,577,000 |
) |
|
|
(2,336,000 |
) |
Increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
7,996,000 |
|
|
|
9,818,000 |
|
Net change in current federal income taxes |
|
|
(3,153,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net change in other current assets and liabilities |
|
|
11,429,000 |
|
|
|
(1,402,000 |
) |
Net change in other noncurrent assets and liabilities |
|
|
(1,658,000 |
) |
|
|
679,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
49,718,000 |
|
|
|
18,946,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(39,451,000 |
) |
|
|
(30,278,000 |
) |
Net change in restricted cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,530,000 |
|
Proceeds from disposal of assets |
|
|
74,000 |
|
|
|
62,000 |
|
Increase in restricted cash |
|
|
(1,000,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Investments in unconsolidated affiliates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(206,000 |
) |
Short-term investments |
|
|
(80,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(40,457,000 |
) |
|
|
(20,892,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,251,000 |
|
Payment to Sodak Gaming, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,499,000 |
) |
Deferred financing costs |
|
|
(5,000 |
) |
|
|
(1,691,000 |
) |
Repayments of long-term debt |
|
|
(925,000 |
) |
|
|
(3,388,000 |
) |
Payments on capital lease obligations |
|
|
(618,000 |
) |
|
|
(30,489,000 |
) |
Issuance of common stock |
|
|
494,000 |
|
|
|
121,000 |
|
Acquisition of treasury stock |
|
|
(1,103,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Limited partner distributions |
|
|
(1,108,000 |
) |
|
|
(1,073,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
|
|
(3,265,000 |
) |
|
|
2,232,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
5,996,000 |
|
|
|
286,000 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
131,849,000 |
|
|
|
155,570,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
137,845,000 |
|
|
$ |
155,856,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying introductory notes and notes to consolidated financial
statements are an integral part of these consolidated statements.
9
HOLLYWOOD CASINO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(1) Organization, Business and Basis of Presentation
Hollywood Casino Corporation (HCC or the Company), is a Delaware corporation which was organized and
incorporated on November 5, 1990. Approximately 51% of the issued and outstanding stock of HCC is owned by Jack E. Pratt, Edward T. Pratt, Jr., William D. Pratt, Edward T. Pratt III, and by certain general partnerships and trusts controlled by the
Pratts and by other family members (collectively, the Pratt Family).
HCC owns all of the
outstanding common stock of Hollywood Casino - Aurora, Inc. (HCA), HWCC - Tunica, Inc. (HCT), HWCC - Louisiana, Inc. (HCL) and HWCC - Shreveport, Inc. (Shreveport Management). HCA is an Illinois
corporation organized during 1990 which owns and operates an approximately 53,000 square foot dockside gaming facility together with other entertainment facilities under the service mark Hollywood Casino® in Aurora, Illinois approximately 35 miles west of downtown Chicago (the Aurora Casino). In March 2001, the Aurora Casino began a
major expansion, highlighted by the construction of its new dockside facility to replace the two riverboats on which it previously conducted gaming operations. The first half of the dockside facility and a new casino entrance were completed and
opened on February 15, 2002. The second half of the dockside facility opened on June 14, 2002 and a new parking facility opened in late June 2002. The total project, including a new buffet which opened in May 2002, cost approximately $76,500,000.
HCT is a Texas corporation formed by HCC during 1993 which owns and operates a 54,000 square foot gaming facility, adjacent support facilities and a 505-room hotel complex under the service mark Hollywood Casino® in northern Tunica County, Mississippi approximately 30 miles south of Memphis, Tennessee (the Tunica Casino). HCL is a
Louisiana corporation formed by HCC in 1993 which owns and operates a 59,000 square foot dockside gaming facility, adjacent support facilities, and a 403-room, all suite, art deco style hotel in Shreveport, Louisiana approximately 180 miles east of
Dallas, Texas (the Shreveport Casino). Shreveport Management is a Louisiana corporation formed by HCC in 1997 which holds the management contract for the Shreveport Casino. The Aurora Casino, the Tunica Casino and the Shreveport Casino
commenced operations in June 1993, August 1994 and December 2000, respectively.
The Company believes that its
three gaming facilities derive a significant amount of their gaming revenues from patrons living in the surrounding areas. Competition within the Companys gaming markets is intense and management believes that this competition will continue or
intensify in the future.
In September 1998, a joint venture in which HCL was a partner (the Shreveport
Partnership) received approval to develop, own and operate the Shreveport Casino. HCL originally planned to develop the Shreveport Casino with two partners in a joint venture in which it would have had an interest of approximately 50%. On
March 31, 1999, HCL entered into a definitive agreement with one of the joint venture partners to acquire its interest in the Shreveport Partnership. As a result, HCL obtained an effective 100% ownership interest in the Shreveport Casino with the
remaining joint venture partner holding a residual interest in the event the project is ever sold amounting to 10% plus any capital contributions made by the joint venture partner to the Shreveport Partnership or otherwise credited to their account.
The joint venture partner also receives an amount equal to 1% of complex net revenues, as defined, of the Shreveport Casino. Accordingly, the Shreveport Partnership is included in the consolidated financial statements of HCC. The
remaining joint venture partners interest is reflected as minority interest on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets at September 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001.
10
HOLLYWOOD CASINO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
The Company, Penn National Gaming, Inc. (Penn National) and P Acquisition Corp., a Delaware
corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Penn National, entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the Merger Agreement), dated as of August 7, 2002, pursuant to which, and subject to the conditions thereof, the Company will
become a wholly owned subsidiary of Penn National through the merger of P Acquisition Corp. with and into the Company. Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, stockholders of the Company will receive cash in the amount of $12.75 per share at
closing.
In connection with the Merger Agreement, Penn National, the Company and certain stockholders of the
Company (who collectively control at least 50.3% of the Companys outstanding shares) executed and delivered Stockholder Agreements, pursuant to which those stockholders have, among other things, covenanted to vote in favor of the adoption of
and otherwise to support the Merger Agreement. Consequently, subject to the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement and Stockholder Agreements, holders of a majority of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of the Company eligible
to vote have agreed to vote in favor of the merger, assuring stockholder approval. Also in connection with the Merger Agreement, the Company and its stock transfer agent amended the existing Rights Agreement, dated as of May 7, 1993, to provide that
the execution, delivery or the performance of the Merger Agreement or the Stockholder Agreements do not trigger its provisions.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements also reflect HCTs one-third investment in Tunica Golf Course LLC and the Shreveport Casinos 50% interest in Shreveport Golf Company under the equity method of accounting.
Tunica Golf Course LLC was organized in 1996 to develop and operate a golf course to be used by patrons of the Tunica Casino and other participating casino/hotel properties. The golf course was completed and opened for play in November 1998.
Shreveport Golf Company was organized in 2000 to develop and operate a golf course to be used by patrons of the Shreveport Casino. As of December 31, 2001, capital contributions amounting to $313,000 had been made to Shreveport Golf Company; no
contributions were made during 2002. Given the difficult market conditions, the partners in the Shreveport golf course provided notice in April 2002 that they were terminating the lease for the land on which the golf course would have been
constructed. Accordingly, the Shreveport Partnership provided a reserve during April 2002 of $313,000 to write down its investment in the limited liability corporation to a zero value. The partners terminated the joint venture effective as of
September 30, 2002. The remaining investment in Tunica Golf Course LLC is included in other noncurrent assets on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 2002; both investments were included in noncurrent assets on the
accompanying consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2001.
The preparation of financial statements in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
The consolidated financial statements as of September 30, 2002 and for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2002 and 2001 have been prepared by HCC without
audit. In the opinion of management these consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the consolidated financial position of HCC as of September 30, 2002,
the results of their operations for the three and nine month periods ended
11
HOLLYWOOD CASINO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
September 30, 2002 and 2001 and their cash flows for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2002 and 2001.
In July 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with
Exit or Disposal Activities (SFAS 146), which requires companies to recognize costs associated with exit or disposal activities when incurred. Current literature requires that these costs be expensed when management commits to an
exit or disposal plan. SFAS 146 is to be applied prospectively to exit or disposal activities initiated after December 31, 2002. The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS 146 to have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.
(2) Earnings per Common Share
Basic earnings per common share is calculated by dividing the net loss by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding. All potential shares are
excluded from the calculation of diluted net loss per share because the effect of their inclusion would be antidilutive. The weighted average number of shares of common stock used for the calculation of both basic and diluted earnings per share was
25,567,211 and 25,002,550, respectively, for the three month periods ended September 30, 2002 and 2001 and 25,440,911 and 24,998,912, respectively, for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2002 and 2001.
The weighted average number of potential common shares and options excluded for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2002
was 1,616,909 and 1,798,998, respectively. The weighted average number of potential common shares and options excluded for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2001 was 1,836,324 and 1,976,031, respectively.
(3) Change in Depreciable Lives
Upon committing to proceed with the Aurora Casino expansion project (see Note 1), management conducted a review of its long-lived assets for possible impairment. Based on the undiscounted cash flows
anticipated to be earned during the construction period, management concluded that no impairment of the Aurora Casinos assets existed and no write down of its assets was required. The Aurora Casino prospectively adjusted the remaining useful
lives of its existing riverboats and other fixed assets being replaced to reduce the recorded net book value of such assets to their estimated net realizable value at the time they would be removed from service. Such accelerated depreciation ceased
during the second quarter of 2002 with the completion of the dockside facility. Consequently, depreciation expense increased by $6,428,000 during the three month period ended September 30, 2001 and by $9,756,000 and $15,002,000, respectively, during
the nine month periods ended September 30, 2002 and 2001.
12
HOLLYWOOD CASINO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
(4) Long-Term Debt and Pledge of Assets
Substantially all of HCCs assets are pledged in connection with its long-term indebtedness. The obligations of HCL and its subsidiaries are non-recourse to HCC.
|
|
September 30, 2002
|
|
|
December 31, 2001
|
|
Indebtedness of HCC: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.25% Senior Secured Notes, due 2007 (a) |
|
$ |
310,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
310,000,000 |
|
Floating rate Senior Secured Notes, due 2006 (a) |
|
|
50,000,000 |
|
|
|
50,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
360,000,000 |
|
|
|
360,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indebtedness of HCA: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Promissory notes to bank (b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
398,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indebtedness of HCT: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment loans (c) |
|
|
8,000 |
|
|
|
245,000 |
|
Bank credit facility (d) |
|
|
665,000 |
|
|
|
950,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
673,000 |
|
|
|
1,195,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indebtedness of HCL which is non-recourse to HCC: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13% Shreveport First Mortgage Notes, with contingent interest, due 2006 (e) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,000,000 |
|
|
|
150,000,000 |
|
13% Shreveport Senior Secured Notes, with contingent interest, due 2006, including premium of $940,000 and $1,078,000,
respectively (f) |
|
|
39,940,000 |
|
|
|
40,078,000 |
|
Other |
|
|
22,000 |
|
|
|
27,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
189,962,000 |
|
|
|
190,105,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total indebtedness |
|
|
550,635,000 |
|
|
|
551,698,000 |
|
Lesscurrent maturities |
|
|
(348,000 |
) |
|
|
(748,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt |
|
$ |
550,287,000 |
|
|
$ |
550,950,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
During May 1999, HCC refinanced its outstanding 12.75% senior secured notes through a debt offering of $310,000,000 of 11.25% Senior Secured Notes due May 1,
2007 and $50,000,000 of floating rate Senior Secured Notes due May 1, 2006 (collectively, the Senior Secured Notes). Interest on the floating rate notes is equal to the six-month LIBOR rate plus 6.28% and is reset semiannually. Effective
interest on the floating rate notes was 8.4% per annum during each of the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2002, and 10.5% and 11.6%, respectively, during the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2001. The interest rate
was reset to 8.38% per annum effective May 1, 2002 and to 7.9% per annum effective November 1, 2002. In addition to refinancing existing debt, the Company used proceeds from the debt offering to fund a portion of its equity investment in the
Shreveport Casino and, during October 1999, to acquire the management and consulting contracts on the Aurora Casino and Tunica Casino. The Company also used proceeds from the debt offering to finance a portion of the construction costs of its new,
dockside gaming facility at the Aurora Casino (see Note 1). Interest on the Senior |
13
HOLLYWOOD CASINO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Secured Notes is payable each May 1 and November 1. The Senior Secured Notes are unconditionally guaranteed
on a senior secured basis by HCT and Shreveport Management and may be guaranteed by certain future subsidiaries of HCC. Neither HCA nor HCL are guarantors. The Senior Secured Notes and related guarantees are secured by, among other things, (1)
substantially all of the assets of HCT and future guarantors, (2) a lien not to exceed approximately $108,000,000 on substantially all of the assets of HCA, (3) a pledge of the capital stock of certain subsidiaries of HCC, including HCA and HCT, and
(4) the collateral assignment of the management contract for the Shreveport Casino. The limitation on the lien described in (2) above was $108,000,000 as of September 30, 2002.
The fixed rate Senior Secured Notes are redeemable at the option of HCC any time on or after May 1, 2003 at 107% of the then outstanding principal amount, decreasing to
104.666%, 102.333% and 100%, respectively, on May 1, 2004, 2005 and 2006.
The floating rate Senior Secured Notes
may be redeemed at the option of HCC at any time at an initial redemption price of 105% plus accrued interest with the redemption premium decreasing by 1% on May 1 of each year beginning May 1, 2000.
The indenture for the Senior Secured Notes contains various provisions limiting the ability of HCC and certain defined subsidiaries to,
among other things, pay dividends or make other restricted payments; incur additional indebtedness or issue preferred stock, create liens, create dividend or other payment restrictions affecting certain defined subsidiaries; enter into mergers or
consolidations or make sales of all or substantially all assets of HCC, HCT, Shreveport Management or any future guarantor; or enter into certain transactions with affiliates. The indenture also requires certain financial reporting information (see
Note 9).
(b) |
|
During May 1999, HCA borrowed $750,000 under a bank loan agreement on an unsecured basis. The loan was payable in 60 monthly installments of $15,000 including
interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum. The outstanding borrowing was repaid in March 2002. |
(c) |
|
The remaining equipment loan at September 30, 2002 is payable monthly including interest at 8.75% to 9% per annum and matures in 2003.
|
(d) |
|
In June 2001, HCT entered into a $3,000,000 bank credit facility available through June 30, 2002. Borrowings under the line of credit are payable over a 36
month period and accrue interest at the banks prime lending rate plus .75% per annum on either a fixed or floating rate basis. Borrowings under the line of credit are collateralized by equipment purchased with the loan proceeds. The line of
credit agreement requires the provision of certain financial reports. During June 2001, HCT borrowed $731,000 under the credit facility at an interest rate of 7.5% per annum. HCT made additional borrowings of $130,000 at the rate of 7.5% per annum
in July 2001 and $220,000 at the rate of 7.25% per annum in August 2001. |
(e) |
|
During August 1999, the Shreveport Partnership issued $150,000,000 of 13% First Mortgage Notes, with contingent interest (the Shreveport First Mortgage
Notes), which are non-recourse to HCC. |
14
HOLLYWOOD CASINO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Fixed interest on the Shreveport First Mortgage Notes is payable on each February 1 and August 1. In
addition, contingent interest accrues and is payable on each interest payment date subsequent to the opening of the Shreveport Casino. The amount of the contingent interest is equal to 5% of the Shreveport Partnerships cash flow, as defined,
for the applicable period subject to a maximum of $5,000,000 for any four consecutive fiscal quarters. Contingent interest amounting to $90,000 and $694,000, respectively, was incurred during the three and nine month periods ended September 30,
2002. Contingent interest amounting to $130,000 was incurred during the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2001. Accrued contingent interest amounted to $1,080,000 and $386,000, respectively, at September 30, 2002 and December 31,
2001. Payment of contingent interest may be deferred to the extent that payment would result in certain financial coverage ratios not being met. The notes are collateralized by a first priority secured interest in substantially all of the Shreveport
Partnerships existing and future assets other than assets secured by the Shreveport Senior Secured Notes (see 4(f)) and up to $6,000,000 in assets that may be acquired with future equipment financing as well as by a pledge of the common stock
of the HCC subsidiaries which hold the partnership interests.
The Shreveport First Mortgage Notes may be redeemed
at any time on or after August 1, 2003 by the Shreveport Partnership at 106.5% of the then outstanding principal amount, decreasing to 103.25% and 100% on or after August 1, 2004 and 2005, respectively.
The indenture for the Shreveport First Mortgage Notes contains various provisions limiting the ability of the Shreveport Partnership to
borrow money, pay dividends, make investments, pledge or sell its assets or enter into mergers or consolidations. The indenture also limits the ability of certain HCC subsidiaries which guarantee the debt to acquire additional assets, become liable
for additional obligations or engage in any business activities other than holding partnership interests or acting as managing general partner.
(f) |
|
In June 2001, the Shreveport Partnership issued $39,000,000 of 13% Senior Secured Notes, with contingent interest, due August 2006 (the Shreveport Senior
Secured Notes). The Shreveport Senior Secured Notes were issued at an initial premium of $1,170,000 to yield interest at an effective rate of 12.21% per annum. Fixed interest on the Shreveport Senior Secured Notes at the annual rate of 13% is
payable on each February 1 and August 1. In addition, contingent interest accrues and is payable on each interest payment date. The amount of contingent interest is equal to 1.3% of the consolidated cash flow of the Shreveport Partnership for the
applicable period subject to a maximum contingent interest of $1,300,000 for any four consecutive fiscal quarters. Contingent interest amounting to $32,000 and $183,000, respectively, was incurred during the three and nine month periods ended
September 30, 2002. Contingent interest amounting to $33,000 was incurred during the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2001. Accrued contingent interest amounted to $261,000 and $78,000 at September 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001,
respectively, and is included in accrued interest payable on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Payment of contingent interest may be deferred to the extent that payment would result in certain financial coverage ratios not being met.
Proceeds from the Shreveport Senior Secured Notes were used, in part, to retire the Shreveport Partnerships capital lease obligation (see Note 5) with the remainder available for working capital purposes. |
15
HOLLYWOOD CASINO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Under the terms of certain intercreditor collateral agreements, the Shreveport Senior Secured Notes are
secured by, among other things, (1) a security interest in certain furniture, fixtures and equipment acquired prior to the opening of the Shreveport Casino for $30,000,000 and (2) a security interest on an equal basis in up to $10,000,000 of the
collateral which secures the Shreveport First Mortgage Notes (see (4e)). The furniture, fixtures and equipment in (1) above were obtained with the proceeds from the capital lease obligation retired with a portion of the proceeds from the Shreveport
Senior Secured Notes.
The Shreveport Senior Secured Notes may be redeemed on the same terms and conditions as the
Shreveport First Mortgage Notes (see (4e)). The indenture to the Shreveport Senior Secured Notes also carries substantially the same limitations, covenants and restrictions as those included in the indenture to the Shreveport First Mortgage Notes
(see (4e)).
Scheduled payments of long-term debt as of September 30, 2002 are set forth below:
2002 (three months) |
|
$ |
65,000 |
2003 |
|
|
380,000 |
2004 |
|
|
244,000 |
2005 |
|
|
6,000 |
2006 |
|
|
239,000,000 |
Thereafter |
|
|
310,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
549,695,000 |
|
|
|
|
Interest paid, net of amounts capitalized, amounted to $43,685,000
and $42,789,000, respectively, during the nine month periods ended September 30, 2002 and 2001.
(5) Capital
Leases
HCA leases two parking garages under capital lease agreements. The first lease has an initial 30-year
term ending in June 2023 with the right to extend the term under renewal options for an additional 67 years. Rental payments through June 2012 equal the City of Auroras financing costs related to its general obligation bond issue used to
finance the construction of the parking garage. The general obligation bond issue originally included interest at rates between 7% and 7.625% per annum. The City of Aurora recently completed a refinancing of its underlying bond issue which reduced
the effective annual interest rate to approximately 5.6%. In accordance with the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards board Statement No. 22, Changes in the Provisions of Lease Agreements Resulting from Refundings of Tax-Exempt
Debt, the outstanding capital lease obligation has been increased by $195,000 to reflect the revised present value of future minimum lease payments using the new effective interest rate and a corresponding loss on early extinguishment of debt
has been reflected on the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the nine month period ended September 30, 2002. Although the principal amount of the capital lease obligation was increased by $195,000, interest savings subsequent to
the refinance date will ultimately reduce cash payment obligations by approximately $761,000. The second lease has an initial term ending in September 2026 with the right to extend the lease for up to 20 additional years. Rental payments during the
first 15 years equal the lessors debt
16
HOLLYWOOD CASINO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
service costs related to the industrial revenue bond issue used to finance a portion of the construction costs of the parking
garage. The remaining construction costs were funded by HCA. In addition, HCA currently pays base rent equal to $17,000 per month ($15,000 per month prior to September 2001) for improvements made to the lessors North Island Center banquet and
meeting facilities. HCA is also responsible for additional rent, consisting of costs such as maintenance costs, insurance premiums and utilities, arising out of its operation of both parking garages.
The Tunica Casino previously leased certain gaming and other equipment under capital lease agreements which have expired. No future
payment obligations exist with respect to these capital leases and the related assets have been fully amortized.
The Shreveport Partnership entered into a financing lease agreement with third party lessors for $30,000,000 to acquire furniture, fixtures and equipment for the Shreveport Casino. During the construction period, the Shreveport
Partnership paid only interest on outstanding borrowings together with a fee of .5% per annum on the undrawn portion of the $30,000,000. Effective with the opening of the Shreveport Casino, the outstanding borrowings became payable in equal
quarterly installments plus interest at LIBOR plus 4%. The lease was treated as a capital lease for financial reporting purposes. Borrowings under the lease were collateralized by the furniture, fixtures and equipment purchased. The lease was
retired in June 2001 with a portion of the proceeds from the Shreveport Senior Secured Notes (see Note 4(f)).
Assets under capital leases and the related accumulated amortization are included on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as follows:
|
|
September 30, 2002
|
|
|
December 31, 2001
|
|
Buildings |
|
$ |
27,358,000 |
|
|
$ |
27,358,000 |
|
Operating equipment |
|
|
3,200,000 |
|
|
|
6,219,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,558,000 |
|
|
|
33,577,000 |
|
Lessaccumulated amortization |
|
|
(9,978,000 |
) |
|
|
(12,316,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
20,580,000 |
|
|
$ |
21,261,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense with respect to assets under capital leases
amounted to $227,000 and $681,000, respectively, during the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2002 and $227,000 and $3,119,000, respectively, for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2001 (including $2,438,000 for the
Shreveport Casinos leased assets prior to the June 15, 2001 lease termination date). The decreases in operating equipment and accumulated amortization at September 30, 2002 result from the write off of certain fully amortized equipment
originally acquired under capital lease agreements.
17
HOLLYWOOD CASINO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Future minimum lease payments under capital lease obligations as of September 30, 2002 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
2002 (three months) |
|
$ |
1,137,000 |
|
2003 |
|
|
2,585,000 |
|
2004 |
|
|
2,603,000 |
|
2005 |
|
|
2,632,000 |
|
2006 |
|
|
2,637,000 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
12,934,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments |
|
|
24,528,000 |
|
Less amount representing interest |
|
|
(7,089,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Present value of future minimum lease payments |
|
|
17,439,000 |
|
Current capital lease obligation |
|
|
(1,403,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term capital lease obligation |
|
$ |
16,036,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6) Income Taxes
Components of HCCs (provision) benefit for income taxes consist of the following:
|
|
Three Months Ended September
30,
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September
30,
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2001
|
|
Current income tax (provision) benefit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
$ |
(144,000 |
) |
|
$ |
1,699,000 |
|
|
$ |
3,153,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,699,000 |
|
State |
|
|
(165,000 |
) |
|
|
632,000 |
|
|
|
(886,000 |
) |
|
|
(192,000 |
) |
Deferred income tax (provision) benefit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
|
(4,295,000 |
) |
|
|
1,595,000 |
|
|
|
(4,606,000 |
) |
|
|
10,444,000 |
|
State |
|
|
521,000 |
|
|
|
739,000 |
|
|
|
1,746,000 |
|
|
|
3,570,000 |
|
Change in valuation allowance |
|
|
(2,313,000 |
) |
|
|
(2,152,000 |
) |
|
|
(2,897,000 |
) |
|
|
(13,525,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(6,396,000 |
) |
|
$ |
2,513,000 |
|
|
$ |
(3,490,000 |
) |
|
$ |
1,996,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No federal income tax payments were made during the nine month
periods ended September 30, 2002 and 2001. State income tax payments of $1,258,000 and $11,000, respectively, were made during the nine month periods ended September 30, 2002 and 2001.
On March 19, 2002, new tax legislation was enacted which extends the carryback period for net operating losses (NOLs) originating in tax years ending in
2001 or 2002. As a result of this change, the Company will be able to utilize NOLs originating in 2001 to request a refund of taxes previously paid in the amount of approximately $3 million. The refund receivable and related tax benefit are
reflected on the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
18
HOLLYWOOD CASINO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
At September 30, 2002, HCC and its subsidiaries have NOLs available for carryforward into future years
for federal income tax purposes totaling approximately $70,671,000, none of which begin to expire until the year 2019. Additionally, HCC and its subsidiaries have alternative minimum and other tax credits available totaling $990,000 and $1,074,000,
respectively. Alternative minimum tax credits do not expire and none of the other tax credits begin to expire until the year 2010. Existing accounting pronouncements require that the tax benefit of such NOLs and credit carryforwards, together
with the tax benefit of deferred tax assets resulting from temporary differences, be recorded as an asset and, to the extent that management can not assess that the utilization of all or a portion of such NOLs and deferred tax assets is more
likely than not, a valuation allowance should be recorded. Based on the significant amount of NOLs available and the near-term expectation of taxable losses, management has provided a valuation allowance to reserve substantially all of the net
deferred tax asset at September 30, 2002. The remaining net deferred tax asset ($268,000) relates to state timing differences expected to reverse. At December 31, 2001, management believed that it was more likely than not that future consolidated
taxable income of HCC would be sufficient to utilize a portion of the net deferred tax asset. Accordingly, a valuation allowance was established which resulted in a net deferred tax asset of $6,012,000.
Sales by HCC or existing stockholders of common stock, or securities convertible into common stock, can cause a change of
control, as defined in Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, which would limit the ability of HCC or its subsidiaries to utilize these loss carryforwards in later tax periods. Should such a change of control occur,
including upon consummation of the proposed acquisition of HCC by Penn National, the amount of loss carryforwards available for use in any one year would most likely be substantially reduced. Future treasury regulations, administrative rulings or
court decisions may also affect HCCs future utilization of its loss carryforwards.
HCC has been informed
that the Internal Revenue Service will soon open an examination of HCCs consolidated federal income tax returns for the years 1999 through 2001.
(7) Transactions with Related Parties
During December 2001, HCC and
Greate Bay Casino Corporation (Greate Bay) reached an agreement to restructure obligations existing between the two companies. The Pratt Family owned approximately 35% of the outstanding common stock of Greate Bay prior to its
liquidation in July 2002. Greate Bay also previously held management and consulting contracts with casino properties owned by HCC. Obligations owed by Greate Bay to HCC consisted of (1) demand notes from Greate Bay with a carrying value of
$5,704,000 and interest thereon with a carrying value of $781,000 and (2) deferred interest notes (the PPI Funding Notes) issued by a subsidiary of Greate Bay which had a final maturity value of $47,603,000 and which were fully reserved
by HCC. The notes and interest were carried at managements estimate of the value of the underlying collateral of the obligations. Because the loans were considered to be impaired and management believed that the recorded amount of the
obligations reflected its best estimate of ultimate recovery, no interest income was recognized on a cash-basis method with respect to either of the obligations from Greate Bay. HCC owed remaining principal of $1,893,000 and interest of $498,000 to
a subsidiary of Greate Bay with respect to HCCs acquisition in 1997 of the general partnership interest in the entity which held the management contract for the Aurora
19
HOLLYWOOD CASINO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Casino. Payments under the obligation to the Greate Bay subsidiary had been suspended since March 1, 2000 while negotiations to
restructure the obligations continued.
Greate Bay was insolvent and, together with certain of its subsidiaries,
filed voluntary petitions for protection under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code on December 28, 2001. As part of its pre-packaged bankruptcy reorganization, Greate Bay sold its primary asset, with the net proceeds from the sale and
Greate Bays other remaining cash to be distributed to an unrestricted subsidiary of HCC (see Note 9). Greate Bay paid $2,000,000 in December 2001 to the unrestricted subsidiary and agreed to offset the $2,391,000 owed by HCC against a like
amount owed to HCC. The sale of Greate Bays primary asset was approved by the bankruptcy court on March 6, 2002 and was completed on March 19, 2002. During the second quarter of 2002, Greate Bay, in order to ensure timely confirmation by the
bankruptcy court, agreed to amend its plan of reorganization to include payment to Las Vegas Sands, Inc. (LVSI) of $1,500,000 for a previously disputed claim. The plan of reorganization was confirmed in July 2002 and HCC received payment
from Greate Bay totaling $13,162,000. Management anticipates the receipt of an additional $1,000,000 upon release of an escrow account during the third quarter of 2003. This escrow account is reflected as restricted cash on the accompanying
consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 2002. Costs and fees incurred or anticipated by HCC are expected to total approximately $2,040,000. Primarily as a result of Greate Bays settlement of the disputed LVSI claim, HCC recorded an
adjustment to the carrying value of its receivables from Greate Bay in the amount of $800,000 as a loss on affiliate obligations on the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the nine month period ended September 30, 2002.
At December 31, 2001, HCC estimated and recorded an accrual for all remaining obligations to certain former
executive officers under their employment and consulting agreements. Certain assumptions made in determining the amount of the accrual were reviewed during the second quarter of 2002 and an adjustment in the amount of $709,000 was credited as
executive compensation adjustment at that time and is reflected on the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the nine month period ended September 30, 2002. As a result of certain Stockholder Agreements entered into in August 2002 in
connection with the announced Merger Agreement with Penn National (see Note 1), the former executive officers agreed to settle their outstanding obligations under the employment and consulting agreements at closing of the merger for the adjusted
balance less any subsequent payments received under their employment and consulting agreements. The remaining obligation reflected on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 2002 is $6,848,000.
During July 2002, the Shreveport Partnership reimbursed $598,000 of construction finish out costs incurred by an outside lessee with
respect to approximately 45,000 square feet of restaurant and entertainment facilities operated on property leased from the Shreveport Casino. Effective as of May 1, 2002, the Shreveport Partnership began receiving rental payments of $6 per square
foot annually, payable at the rate of $22,000 per month. In addition, the Shreveport Partnership will receive percentage rentals as specified in the lease agreement. Total rental income earned during the three and nine month periods ended September
30, 2002 amounted to $67,000 and $112,000, respectively. The lessee is a limited liability company in which certain relatives of Jack E. Pratt, a principal stockholder and director of HCC, hold directly or indirectly a 22.5% interest. These
relatives, as well as certain other associates of the principal stockholder, have held and may continue to hold directly or indirectly interests in certain sublessees of the lessee that are or will be operating tenants in the space.
20
HOLLYWOOD CASINO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
(8) Litigation
On April 23, 2000, the construction site for the Shreveport Casino suffered tornado damage which contributed to the delay in opening the facility. Management filed
damage claims and received reimbursements from its insurance carrier during 2000 in the amount of approximately $1,500,000 to cover substantially all of the cost of repairing the damage incurred. Management is also seeking to recover lost profits
and related claims under its business interruption insurance coverage. To the extent the delay in the facilitys opening was the responsibility of contractors, management is also seeking to recover damages from those entities. These matters are
the subject of a lawsuit pending in U.S. District Court in Louisiana. For this and other reasons, the Shreveport Partnership has withheld payment of certain retainage amounts which the general contractor is currently seeking. The general contractor
has also submitted additional change orders which the Shreveport Partnership is disputing. The accompanying consolidated balance sheets at September 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001 include a liability in the amount of approximately $3,600,000 in
accounts payable in connection with the construction project. Both the recovery of any amounts by the Shreveport Partnership from either its insurance companies or the contractors and the need to pay the general contractor any additional amounts are
currently subject to litigation and management is unable to determine the amounts, if any, that will ultimately be received or paid.
In February 2002, the Company filed an action in state court in Dallas County, Texas alleging that Jack E. Pratt, a director and stockholder of the Company, breached his fiduciary duties to the Companys stockholders by
using Company funds and property for personal reasons and concealing his and his immediate familys interests in entities doing business with the Company (the State Court Lawsuit). The Company seeks multiple remedies in the State
Court Lawsuit, including restitution for such improper actions, as well as a declaratory judgement that the Company be relieved of any further financial obligations under Mr. Pratts employment agreement with the Company. As of September 30,
2002, the total of such obligations to Mr. Pratt included on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet amounted to $3,298,000. The State Court Lawsuit may also affect the ability of Mr. Pratt to exercise stock options previously granted to him.
In addition to the above action, the Company also filed a lawsuit in February 2002 in U.S. District Court in
Texas against a number of individuals and their affiliates, including Mr. Jack E. Pratt and Mr. William D. Pratt, two of the Companys directors and stockholders, alleging violations of the federal securities laws (the Federal Court
Lawsuit). Such allegations include the failure to properly report that the defendants and their affiliates have been acting in concert as a group in connection with a planned proxy contest at the next annual shareholders meeting and that
certain affiliates have acquired common stock of the Company while in possession of material non-public information regarding the Company. The Company seeks multiple remedies, including requiring the defendants to truthfully and accurately report
their activities, as well as seeking an order to enjoin the defendants from further purchases of stock and from voting their shares of stock.
As a result of certain Stockholder Agreements entered into in August 2002 in connection with the announced Merger Agreement whereby HCC, subject to the conditions thereof, will become a wholly owned
subsidiary of Penn National (see Note 1), claims between the Company and the stockholders who
21
HOLLYWOOD CASINO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
are also defendants in the State Court Lawsuit and the Federal Court Lawsuit will be stayed while the Merger Agreement remains in
effect and released if, and at the time that, the merger between HCC and Penn National is consummated.
(9) Unrestricted Subsidiaries
Under the terms of the indenture to
the Senior Secured Notes (see Note 4(a)), certain subsidiaries and investees of HCC have been designated as Unrestricted Subsidiaries. Unrestricted Subsidiaries generally do not provide credit support for the Senior Secured Notes and
obligations of Unrestricted Subsidiaries are non-recourse to HCC. Unrestricted Subsidiaries of HCC presently consist of HCL and its subsidiaries; HWCC-Holdings, Inc. and HWCC-Golf Course Partners, Inc. The following presentation summarizes the
financial position and results of operations of the Company reflecting its Unrestricted Subsidiaries under the equity method of accounting. Such information is not intended to be a presentation in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States and is included for purposes of complying with certain reporting requirements as contained in the indenture to the Senior Secured Notes.
Condensed Balance Sheet
Equity Method for Investment in Unrestricted Subsidiaries
September 30, 2002
(amounts in thousands)
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash items |
|
$ |
82,845 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
80 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
1,000 |
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $2,542 |
|
|
3,977 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
1,435 |
|
Federal income taxes receivable |
|
|
2,996 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
4,919 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97,252 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in and advances toUnrestricted Subsidiaries |
|
|
20,922 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization of $77,428 |
|
|
197,836 |
|
Other Assets: |
|
|
|
|
Deferred finance costs |
|
|
6,394 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
12,161 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
334,565 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt and capital leases |
|
$ |
1,745 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
47,476 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
2,586 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,807 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
360,331 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital lease obligations |
|
|
16,036 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other noncurrent liabilities |
|
|
8,155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders deficit: |
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
3 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
217,118 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(318,885 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(101,764 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
334,565 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
HOLLYWOOD CASINO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Condensed Statements of Operations
Equity Method for Investment in Unrestricted Subsidiaries
Three and Nine Month Periods Ended September 30, 2002
(amounts in thousands)
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2002
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2002
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues |
|
$ |
93,958 |
|
|
$ |
267,741 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Departmental expenses |
|
|
68,289 |
|
|
|
180,945 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
6,729 |
|
|
|
20,588 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
4,105 |
|
|
|
21,131 |
|
Development |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
195 |
|
Executive compensation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(709 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
79,132 |
|
|
|
222,219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
14,826 |
|
|
|
45,522 |
|
Non-operating expense, net |
|
|
(10,320 |
) |
|
|
(29,436 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxes and other item |
|
|
4,506 |
|
|
|
16,086 |
|
Income tax benefit (provision) |
|
|
(6,396 |
) |
|
|
(3,490 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before other item |
|
|
(1,890 |
) |
|
|
12,596 |
|
Equity in losses of unrestricted subsidiaries |
|
|
(7,766 |
) |
|
|
(19,939 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(9,656 |
) |
|
$ |
(7,343 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10) Contingencies
HCC previously was notified that the Louisiana State Police, Casino Gaming Division (the Division) had set a hearing regarding
testimony of a third party given in a court proceeding which may be in conflict with testimony provided by Jack E. Pratt, a current director of HCC, to representatives of the Division. Prior to such a hearing, HCCs Louisiana licensee
subsidiary, the Shreveport Partnership, and the Division have entered into an agreement in which, among other things, the Shreveport Partnership acknowledges no violation of law but agrees to pay to the Division the sum of $200,000. The agreement is
subject to the approval of the Louisiana Gaming Control Board and only effective upon consummation of the announced merger of HCC and Penn National. If the Louisiana Gaming Control Board does not approve the agreement or the merger is not
consummated, the respective parties to the agreement will be in the same position they were in prior to entering into the agreement and, absent another settlement, a hearing on the subject matters would likely proceed. In such event, while statutory
23
HOLLYWOOD CASINO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
authority provides that a hearing officer at such a hearing may impose a penalty on the Shreveport Partnership and/or suspend,
revoke or restrict its license, the Shreveport Partnership would aggressively defend against any such action.
In connection with the announced merger of HCC with Penn National (see Note 1), the Company will enter into financial arrangements with certain employees as an inducement for them to continue their employment until the merger is
closed. Once these arrangements are approved by the Compensation Committee of the Companys Board of Directors, the payment will be accrued and amortized over the period from approval of the arrangement through the anticipated closing date of
the merger in the first quarter of 2003. The total amount of the payments is estimated to be $500,000.
Edward T.
Pratt III, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, has advised the Company that he intends to submit documentation seeking reimbursement of expenses incurred by him on behalf of the Company covering periods from 1995 to 2001. Upon receipt, the
Company will review such documentation and, subject to the approval of the Audit Committee of the Companys Board of Directors, anticipates that it will record or capitalize the costs, as appropriate, during the fourth quarter of 2002. The
total amount for which Mr. Pratt may be reimbursed, net of outstanding receivables of $29,000 at September 30, 2002, is estimated to be in the range of $31,000 to $56,000.
(11) Supplemental Cash Flow Information
During 2002, officers of HCC exercised certain options to acquire common stock of the Company by means of tendering common stock in accordance with the terms of the 1996 Hollywood Casino Corporation Long-Term Incentive Plan. The
officers exercised options for 340,000 shares of common stock, using 140,918 shares previously held by the officers (valued at a weighted average market price of $13.74 per share) and approximately $1,000 cash to pay the exercise price ($834,000)
and the related taxes required to be withheld ($1,103,000). HCC has reflected the 140,918 shares tendered on the accompanying consolidated statement of cash flows for the nine month period ended September 30, 2002 as treasury stock acquired for the
$1,103,000 HCC paid with respect to taxes. The additional $833,000 in market value of the treasury stock received and the corresponding exercise price for the common stock issued are excluded from the accompanying consolidated statement of cash
flows for the nine month period ended September 30, 2002 as a noncash transaction.
(12) Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior years consolidated financial statements to
conform to the 2002 consolidated financial statement presentation.
24
INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS REPORT
To the Board of Directors and Shareholder of
Hollywood Casino - Aurora, Inc.:
We have reviewed the accompanying condensed balance
sheet of Hollywood Casino - Aurora, Inc. as of September 30, 2002, the related condensed statements of operations for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2002 and 2001 and cash flows for the nine month periods ended September 30,
2002 and 2001. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management.
We conducted our reviews in
accordance with standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial data and of making inquiries of persons
responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, the objective of which is the expression of an
opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.
Based on our reviews, we
are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to such condensed financial statements for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We have previously audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, the balance sheet of Hollywood Casino -
Aurora, Inc. as of December 31, 2001, and the related statements of operations, shareholders equity and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated March 19, 2002, we expressed an unqualified opinion on
those financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying condensed balance sheet as of December 31, 2001 is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the balance sheet from which it has been derived.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Dallas, Texas
November 7, 2002
25
HOLLYWOOD CASINOAURORA, INC.
(wholly owned by Hollywood Casino Corporation)
BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
September 30, 2002
|
|
|
December 31, 2001
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
28,443,000 |
|
|
$ |
21,443,000 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
80,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $830,000 and $849,000, respectively |
|
|
1,784,000 |
|
|
|
1,202,000 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
858,000 |
|
|
|
803,000 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
2,083,000 |
|
|
|
1,995,000 |
|
Due from affiliates |
|
|
769,000 |
|
|
|
147,000 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
1,399,000 |
|
|
|
1,327,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
35,416,000 |
|
|
|
26,917,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and Equipment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land improvements |
|
|
6,610,000 |
|
|
|
3,167,000 |
|
Buildings and improvements |
|
|
47,559,000 |
|
|
|
46,205,000 |
|
Riverboats and barge |
|
|
53,811,000 |
|
|
|
42,365,000 |
|
Operating equipment |
|
|
32,764,000 |
|
|
|
43,999,000 |
|
Construction in progress |
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,668,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140,744,000 |
|
|
|
182,404,000 |
|
Lessaccumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(25,552,000 |
) |
|
|
(82,392,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net property and equipment |
|
|
115,192,000 |
|
|
|
100,012,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
2,566,000 |
|
|
|
731,000 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
2,250,000 |
|
|
|
2,290,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other assets |
|
|
4,816,000 |
|
|
|
3,021,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
155,424,000 |
|
|
$ |
129,950,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying introductory notes and notes to financial statements are
an
integral part of these balance sheets.
26
HOLLYWOOD CASINOAURORA, INC.
(wholly owned by Hollywood Casino Corporation)
BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
September 30, 2002 (Unaudited)
|
|
|
December 31, 2001
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt and capital lease obligations |
|
$ |
1,403,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,464,000 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
3,792,000 |
|
|
|
11,125,000 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and wages |
|
|
2,495,000 |
|
|
|
3,515,000 |
|
Interest |
|
|
5,249,000 |
|
|
|
2,041,000 |
|
Gaming and other taxes |
|
|
6,909,000 |
|
|
|
1,260,000 |
|
Insurance |
|
|
937,000 |
|
|
|
501,000 |
|
Other |
|
|
3,238,000 |
|
|
|
2,873,000 |
|
Due to affiliates |
|
|
61,000 |
|
|
|
1,532,000 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
1,204,000 |
|
|
|
1,226,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
25,288,000 |
|
|
|
25,537,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Debt |
|
|
108,000,000 |
|
|
|
81,249,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Lease Obligations |
|
|
16,036,000 |
|
|
|
16,554,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value per share; 2,000,000 shares authorized; 1,501,000 shares issued and
outstanding |
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
15,000 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
25,541,000 |
|
|
|
25,541,000 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(19,456,000 |
) |
|
|
(18,946,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
6,100,000 |
|
|
|
6,610,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
155,424,000 |
|
|
$ |
129,950,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying introductory notes
and notes to financial statements are an
integral part of these balance sheets.
27
HOLLYWOOD CASINOAURORA, INC.
(wholly owned by Hollywood Casino Corporation)
STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
|
|
Three Months Ended September
30,
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2001
|
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Casino |
|
$ |
71,453,000 |
|
|
$ |
58,444,000 |
|
Food and beverage |
|
|
3,923,000 |
|
|
|
3,507,000 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,210,000 |
|
|
|
779,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,586,000 |
|
|
|
62,730,000 |
|
Lesspromotional allowances |
|
|
(9,543,000 |
) |
|
|
(8,430,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues |
|
|
67,043,000 |
|
|
|
54,300,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Casino |
|
|
47,189,000 |
|
|
|
33,018,000 |
|
Food and beverage |
|
|
1,350,000 |
|
|
|
1,308,000 |
|
Other |
|
|
433,000 |
|
|
|
262,000 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
1,531,000 |
|
|
|
1,312,000 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
2,525,000 |
|
|
|
8,181,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
53,028,000 |
|
|
|
44,081,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
14,015,000 |
|
|
|
10,219,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-operating income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
155,000 |
|
Interest expense, net of capitalized interest of $328,000 in 2001 |
|
|
(3,092,000 |
) |
|
|
(1,894,000 |
) |
Gain on disposal of assets |
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-operating expense, net |
|
|
(3,030,000 |
) |
|
|
(1,738,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
10,985,000 |
|
|
|
8,481,000 |
|
Income tax provision |
|
|
(4,003,000 |
) |
|
|
(2,903,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
6,982,000 |
|
|
$ |
5,578,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying introductory notes and notes to financial statements
are an integral part of these financial statements.
28
HOLLYWOOD CASINOAURORA, INC.
(wholly owned by Hollywood Casino Corporation)
STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
|
|
Nine Months Ended September
30,
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2001
|
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Casino |
|
$ |
203,711,000 |
|
|
$ |
171,925,000 |
|
Food and beverage |
|
|
11,183,000 |
|
|
|
10,905,000 |
|
Other |
|
|
3,035,000 |
|
|
|
2,329,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
217,929,000 |
|
|
|
185,159,000 |
|
Lesspromotional allowances |
|
|
(26,803,000 |
) |
|
|
(24,982,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues |
|
|
191,126,000 |
|
|
|
160,177,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Casino |
|
|
120,444,000 |
|
|
|
97,988,000 |
|
Food and beverage |
|
|
4,171,000 |
|
|
|
4,084,000 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,013,000 |
|
|
|
710,000 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
4,640,000 |
|
|
|
3,842,000 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
16,613,000 |
|
|
|
20,340,000 |
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
195,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
147,076,000 |
|
|
|
126,964,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
44,050,000 |
|
|
|
33,213,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-operating income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
131,000 |
|
|
|
604,000 |
|
Interest expense, net of capitalized interest of $1,251,000 and $466,000, respectively |
|
|
(7,099,000 |
) |
|
|
(6,217,000 |
) |
Loss on disposal of assets |
|
|
(87,000 |
) |
|
|
(65,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-operating expense, net |
|
|
(7,055,000 |
) |
|
|
(5,678,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
36,995,000 |
|
|
|
27,535,000 |
|
Income tax provision |
|
|
(13,540,000 |
) |
|
|
(9,742,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
23,455,000 |
|
|
$ |
17,793,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying introductory notes and notes to financial statements
are an integral part of these financial statements.
29
HOLLYWOOD CASINOAURORA, INC.
(wholly owned by Hollywood Casino Corporation)
STATEMENTS OF
CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2001
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
23,455,000 |
|
|
$ |
17,793,000 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
16,613,000 |
|
|
|
20,340,000 |
|
Provision for doubtful accounts |
|
|
45,000 |
|
|
|
135,000 |
|
Loss on disposal of assets |
|
|
87,000 |
|
|
|
65,000 |
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
195,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax benefit |
|
|
(1,923,000 |
) |
|
|
(5,039,000 |
) |
Increase in accounts receivables |
|
|
(627,000 |
) |
|
|
(122,000 |
) |
Increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
1,305,000 |
|
|
|
10,685,000 |
|
Net change in affiliate balances |
|
|
(2,093,000 |
) |
|
|
5,499,000 |
|
Net change in other current assets and liabilities |
|
|
(149,000 |
) |
|
|
(121,000 |
) |
Net change in other noncurrent assets and liabilities |
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
(40,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
36,948,000 |
|
|
|
49,195,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(31,902,000 |
) |
|
|
(21,872,000 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of assets |
|
|
22,000 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
(80,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(31,960,000 |
) |
|
|
(21,822,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt |
|
|
26,993,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments of long-term debt |
|
|
(398,000 |
) |
|
|
(710,000 |
) |
Payments on capital lease obligations |
|
|
(618,000 |
) |
|
|
(489,000 |
) |
Dividends |
|
|
(23,965,000 |
) |
|
|
(18,043,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
2,012,000 |
|
|
|
(19,242,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
7,000,000 |
|
|
|
8,131,000 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
21,443,000 |
|
|
|
21,164,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
28,443,000 |
|
|
$ |
29,295,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying introductory notes and notes to financial statements
are an integral part of these financial statements.
30
HOLLYWOOD CASINOAURORA, INC.
(wholly owned by Hollywood Casino Corporation)
NOTES TO
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(1) Organization, Business and Basis of Presentation
Hollywood
Casino - Aurora, Inc. (HCA) is an Illinois corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of Hollywood Casino Corporation (HCC), a Delaware corporation. HCA was organized and incorporated during December 1990 for the purpose of
developing and holding the ownership interest in a riverboat gaming operation located in Aurora, Illinois (the Aurora Casino) and was acquired by HCC in May 1992 through the issuance of HCC stock.
HCC, Penn National Gaming, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation (Penn National), and P Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation
and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Penn National, entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the Merger Agreement), dated as of August 7, 2002, pursuant to which, and subject to the conditions thereof, HCC will become a wholly owned
subsidiary of Penn National through the merger of P Acquisition Corp. with and into HCC. In connection with the Merger Agreement, Penn National, HCC and certain stockholders of HCC (who collectively control at least 50.3% of HCCs outstanding
shares) executed and delivered Stockholder Agreements, pursuant to which those stockholders have, among other things, covenanted to vote in favor of the adoption of and otherwise to support the Merger Agreement. Consequently, subject to the terms
and conditions of the Merger Agreement and Stockholder Agreements, holders of a majority of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of HCC eligible to vote have agreed to vote in favor of the merger, assuring stockholder approval.
Prior to February 15, 2002, the Aurora Casino conducted its gaming operations on two, four-level riverboats
having a combined casino space of approximately 32,000 square feet. In March 2001, the Aurora Casino began a major expansion, highlighted by the construction of a new dockside facility to replace its two riverboats. The first half of the dockside
facility and a new casino entrance were completed and opened on February 15, 2002. The second half of the dockside facility opened on June 14, 2002 and a new parking facility opened in late June 2002. The total project, including a new buffet which
opened in May 2002, cost approximately $76,500,000. The combined dockside facility has approximately 53,000 square feet of gaming space on a single level. Admissions, food service and various administrative functions are housed in an adjacent
four-level pavilion. The Aurora Casino, in addition to surface parking lots, has two parking garages with approximately 1,340 parking spaces. HCA was responsible for the design and construction of the parking garages; however, it leases the
facilities under long-term lease agreements. The leases are treated as capital leases for financial reporting purposes (see Note 4).
The Aurora Casino commenced operations on June 17, 1993. HCAs current Owners License was renewed by the Illinois Gaming Board in December 2000 for a period of four years to December 2004. Gaming taxes imposed by
the state of Illinois are determined using a graduated tax rate applied to the licensees gaming revenues. Effective July 1, 2002, the State of Illinois increased the graduated tax rate structure by increasing certain tax rates, adding new tax
brackets and raising the highest marginal tax rate from 35% to 50%. This highest marginal tax rate applies to annual adjusted gross receipts, as defined, in excess of $200,000,000. In addition, the State increased the admissions tax from
$2 per person to $3 per person. These changes resulted in increased taxes amounting to $9,129,000 for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2002. Had the new tax increases been in effect during 2001, gaming
31
HOLLYWOOD CASINOAURORA, INC.
(wholly owned by Hollywood Casino Corporation)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
and admission taxes for
the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2001 would have increased by $3,891,000 and $11,418,000, respectively.
HCA estimates that a significant amount of the Aurora Casinos revenues are derived from patrons living in the Chicago area and surrounding northern and western suburbs. The Aurora Casino faces intense competition from other
riverboat gaming operations in Illinois and Indiana which serve the Chicago area and management believes that this competition will continue in the future.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from
those estimates.
The financial statements as of September 30, 2002 and for the three and nine month periods ended
September 30, 2002 and 2001 have been prepared by HCA without audit. In the opinion of management, these financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the financial
position of HCA as of September 30, 2002, the results of its operations for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2002 and 2001 and its cash flows for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2002 and 2001.
In July 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or
Disposal Activities (SFAS 146), which requires companies to recognize costs associated with exit or disposal activities when incurred. Current literature requires that these costs be expensed when management commits to an exit or
disposal plan. SFAS 146 is to be applied prospectively to exit or disposal activities initiated after December 31, 2002. HCA does not expect the adoption of SFAS 146 to have a material effect on its financial statements.
(2) Change in Depreciable Lives
Upon committing to proceed with the Aurora Casino expansion project (see Note 1), management conducted a review of its long-lived assets for possible impairment. Based on the undiscounted cash flows
anticipated to be earned during the construction period, management concluded that no impairment of the Aurora Casinos assets existed and no write down of its assets was required. The Aurora Casino prospectively adjusted the remaining useful
lives of its existing riverboats and other fixed assets being replaced to reduce the recorded net book value of such assets to their estimated net realizable value at the time they would be removed from service. Such accelerated depreciation ceased
during the second quarter of 2002 with the completion of the dockside facility. Consequently, depreciation expense increased by $6,428,000 during the three month period ended September 30, 2001 and by $9,756,000 and $15,002,000, respectively, during
the nine month periods ended September 30, 2002 and 2001.
32
HOLLYWOOD CASINOAURORA, INC.
(wholly owned by Hollywood Casino Corporation)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
(3) Long-Term Debt and Pledge of Assets
HCAs long-term
indebtedness consists of the following:
|
|
September 30, 2002
|
|
December 31, 2001
|
|
11.25% Promissory note to HCC, due on May 1, 2007 (a) |
|
$ |
108,000,000 |
|
$ |
81,007,000 |
|
Promissory note to bank (b) |
|
|
|
|
|
398,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total indebtedness |
|
|
108,000,000 |
|
|
81,405,000 |
|
Lesscurrent maturities |
|
|
|
|
|
(156,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt |
|
$ |
108,000,000 |
|
$ |
81,249,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The intercompany note was issued as of May 19, 1999 and accrues interest at the rate of 11.25% per annum. The initial borrowing on the note in the amount of
$29,007,000 replaced a previous intercompany note with HCC which accrued interest at the rate of 12.75%. During October 1999, HCA borrowed an additional $37,000,000 from HCC under the note agreement to acquire and terminate its management contract.
During the fourth quarter of 2001, HCA borrowed an additional $15,000,000 from HCC under the note agreement in connection with the Aurora Casino expansion project (see Note 1); HCA borrowed an additional $5,000,000 in April 2002, $7,000,000 in June
2002 and $14,993,000 in August 2002. HCA may borrow up to a total of $108,000,000 under the intercompany note agreement. Interest on advances is payable each October 15 and April 15. The intercompany note is pledged as security with respect to
HCCs $360,000,000 Senior Secured Notes due in 2006 and 2007. HCA is not a guarantor of HCCs indebtedness; however, the indebtedness is secured, in part, by a lien on substantially all of the assets of HCA and by a pledge of the capital
stock of HCA. The lien is limited to the outstanding principal amount on the intercompany note to HCC. |
(b) |
|
During May 1999, HCA borrowed $750,000 under a bank loan agreement on an unsecured basis. The loan was payable in 60 monthly installments of $15,000 including
interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum and was repaid in March 2002. |
HCAs only future
maturity of long-term debt is its intercompany note to HCC (see (a) above) due in 2007. Interest paid for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2002 and 2001 (net of amounts capitalized) amounted to $3,891,000 and $4,218,000, respectively.
33
HOLLYWOOD CASINOAURORA, INC.
(wholly owned by Hollywood Casino Corporation)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
(4) Capital Leases
HCA leases two parking garages under capital
lease agreements. The first lease has an initial 30-year term ending in June 2023 with the right to extend the term under renewal options for an additional 67 years. Rental payments through June 2012 equal the City of Auroras financing costs
related to its general obligation bond issue used to finance the construction of the parking garage. The general obligation bond issue originally included interest at rates between 7% and 7.625% per annum. The City of Aurora recently completed a
refinancing of its underlying bond issue which reduced the effective annual interest rate to approximately 5.6%. In accordance with the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 22, Changes in the Provisions of Lease
Agreements Resulting from Refundings of Tax-Exempt Debt, the outstanding capital lease obligation has been increased by $195,000 to reflect the revised present value of future minimum lease payments using the new effective interest rate and a
corresponding loss on early extinguishment of debt has been reflected on the accompanying statement of operations for the nine month period ended September 30, 2002. Although the principal amount of the capital lease obligation was increased by
$195,000, interest savings subsequent to the refinance date will ultimately reduce cash payment obligations by approximately $761,000. The second lease has an initial term ending in September 2026 with the right to extend the lease for up to 20
additional years. Rental payments during the first 15 years equal the lessors debt service costs related to the industrial revenue bond issue used to finance a portion of the construction costs of the parking garage. The remaining construction
costs were funded by HCA. In addition, HCA currently pays base rent equal to $17,000 per month ($15,000 per month prior to September 2001) for improvements made to the lessors North Island Center banquet and meeting facilities. HCA is also
responsible for additional rent, consisting of costs such as maintenance costs, insurance premiums and utilities, arising out of its operation of both parking garages.
The original cost of HCAs parking garages is included in buildings and improvements on the accompanying balance sheets at both September 30, 2002 and December 31,
2001 in the amount of $27,358,000. Amortization expense with respect to these assets amounted to $227,000 and $681,000, respectively, during each of the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2002 and 2001. Accumulated amortization at
September 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001 with respect to assets under capital leases amounted to $6,778,000 and $8,543,000, respectively. The decrease in accumulated amortization at September 30, 2002 results from the write off of certain fully
amortized equipment originally acquired under capital lease agreements.
34
HOLLYWOOD CASINOAURORA, INC.
(wholly owned by Hollywood Casino Corporation)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Future minimum lease payments under capital lease obligations as of September 30, 2002 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
2002 (three months) |
|
$ |
1,137,000 |
|
2003 |
|
|
2,585,000 |
|
2004 |
|
|
2,603,000 |
|
2005 |
|
|
2,632,000 |
|
2006 |
|
|
2,637,000 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
12,934,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments |
|
|
24,528,000 |
|
Less amount representing interest |
|
|
(7,089,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Present value of future minimum lease payments |
|
|
17,439,000 |
|
Current capital lease obligation |
|
|
(1,403,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term capital lease obligation |
|
$ |
16,036,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5) Income Taxes
HCAs provision for income taxes consists of the following:
|
|
Three Months Ended September
30,
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September
30,
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2001
|
|
Current (provision) benefit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
$ |
(2,422,000 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,401,000 |
) |
|
$ |
(14,605,000 |
) |
|
$ |
(14,605,000 |
) |
State |
|
|
(147,000 |
) |
|
|
647,000 |
|
|
|
(858,000 |
) |
|
|
(176,000 |
) |
Deferred (provision) benefit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
|
(1,359,000 |
) |
|
|
1,669,000 |
|
|
|
1,668,000 |
|
|
|
4,550,000 |
|
State |
|
|
(75,000 |
) |
|
|
182,000 |
|
|
|
255,000 |
|
|
|
489,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(4,003,000 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,903,000 |
) |
|
$ |
(13,540,000 |
) |
|
$ |
(9,742,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HCA is included in HCCs consolidated federal income tax
return. Pursuant to agreements between HCC and HCA, HCAs current provision for federal income taxes is based on the amount of tax which would be provided if a separate federal income tax return were filed. HCA paid federal income taxes
amounting to $16,390,000 and $8,640,000, respectively, during the nine month periods ended September 30, 2002 and 2001. HCA paid state income taxes of $1,226,000 and $9,000, respectively, during the nine month periods ended September 30, 2002 and
2001.
HCC has been informed that the Internal Revenue Service will soon open an examination of HCCs
consolidated federal income tax returns for the years 1999 through 2001.
35
INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS REPORT
To the Board of Directors and Shareholder of
HWCC -
Tunica, Inc.:
We have reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet of HWCC - Tunica, Inc. and subsidiary as of
September 30, 2002, the related condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2002 and 2001 and cash flows for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2002 and 2001. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Companys management.
We conducted our reviews in accordance with standards established by
the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial data and of making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting
matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements
taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.
Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications
that should be made to such condensed consolidated financial statements for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We have previously audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, the consolidated balance sheet of HWCC - Tunica, Inc. and subsidiary as of December
31, 2001, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders equity and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated March 19, 2002, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those
consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2001 is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet
from which it has been derived.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Dallas, Texas
November 7, 2002
36
HWCCTUNICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(wholly owned by Hollywood Casino Corporation)
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
September 30, 2002
|
|
|
December 31, 2001
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
20,085,000 |
|
|
$ |
19,922,000 |
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $1,712,000 and $2,188,000, respectively |
|
|
2,157,000 |
|
|
|
1,822,000 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
577,000 |
|
|
|
568,000 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
675,000 |
|
|
|
679,000 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
961,000 |
|
|
|
1,052,000 |
|
Due from affiliates |
|
|
129,000 |
|
|
|
58,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
24,584,000 |
|
|
|
24,101,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and Equipment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land and improvements |
|
|
5,015,000 |
|
|
|
4,808,000 |
|
Buildings |
|
|
79,828,000 |
|
|
|
76,946,000 |
|
Barges |
|
|
2,524,000 |
|
|
|
2,524,000 |
|
Operating equipment |
|
|
41,610,000 |
|
|
|
49,554,000 |
|
Construction in progress |
|
|
3,894,000 |
|
|
|
474,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
132,871,000 |
|
|
|
134,306,000 |
|
Lessaccumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(50,830,000 |
) |
|
|
(54,168,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net property and equipment |
|
|
82,041,000 |
|
|
|
80,138,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land rights |
|
|
6,486,000 |
|
|
|
6,639,000 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
4,084,000 |
|
|
|
4,195,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other assets |
|
|
10,570,000 |
|
|
|
10,834,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
117,195,000 |
|
|
$ |
115,073,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying introductory notes and notes to consolidated financial
statements
are an integral part of these consolidated balance sheets.
37
HWCCTUNICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(wholly owned by Hollywood Casino Corporation)
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
September 30, 2002
|
|
|
December 31, 2001
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt |
|
$ |
342,000 |
|
|
$ |
586,000 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
2,367,000 |
|
|
|
911,000 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and wages |
|
|
1,800,000 |
|
|
|
1,988,000 |
|
Interest |
|
|
437,000 |
|
|
|
437,000 |
|
Gaming and other taxes |
|
|
1,566,000 |
|
|
|
1,282,000 |
|
Insurance |
|
|
2,170,000 |
|
|
|
2,194,000 |
|
Other |
|
|
3,035,000 |
|
|
|
2,907,000 |
|
Due to affiliates |
|
|
72,000 |
|
|
|
695,000 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
1,269,000 |
|
|
|
1,812,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
13,058,000 |
|
|
|
12,812,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Debt |
|
|
87,705,000 |
|
|
|
87,983,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Income Taxes |
|
|
675,000 |
|
|
|
679,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value per share; 100,000 shares authorized; 1,000 shares issued and outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
22,637,000 |
|
|
|
22,637,000 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(6,880,000 |
) |
|
|
(9,038,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
15,757,000 |
|
|
|
13,599,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
117,195,000 |
|
|
$ |
115,073,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying introductory notes and notes to consolidated financial
statements
are an integral part of these consolidated balance sheets.
38
HWCCTUNICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(wholly owned by Hollywood Casino Corporation)
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
|
|
Three Months Ended September
30,
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2001
|
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Casino |
|
$ |
29,110,000 |
|
|
$ |
27,576,000 |
|
Rooms |
|
|
1,674,000 |
|
|
|
1,888,000 |
|
Food and beverage |
|
|
4,232,000 |
|
|
|
4,496,000 |
|
Other |
|
|
522,000 |
|
|
|
469,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,538,000 |
|
|
|
34,429,000 |
|
Lesspromotional allowances |
|
|
(9,359,000 |
) |
|
|
(9,394,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues |
|
|
26,179,000 |
|
|
|
25,035,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Casino |
|
|
17,878,000 |
|
|
|
18,361,000 |
|
Rooms |
|
|
302,000 |
|
|
|
233,000 |
|
Food and beverage |
|
|
917,000 |
|
|
|
884,000 |
|
Other |
|
|
220,000 |
|
|
|
229,000 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
1,619,000 |
|
|
|
1,231,000 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1,526,000 |
|
|
|
1,415,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
22,462,000 |
|
|
|
22,353,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
3,717,000 |
|
|
|
2,682,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-operating income (expenses): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
27,000 |
|
|
|
74,000 |
|
Interest expense, net of capitalized interest of $55,000 in 2002 |
|
|
(2,422,000 |
) |
|
|
(2,484,000 |
) |
Equity in losses of unconsolidated affiliate |
|
|
(92,000 |
) |
|
|
(43,000 |
) |
(Loss) gain on disposal of assets |
|
|
(203,000 |
) |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-operating expenses, net |
|
|
(2,690,000 |
) |
|
|
(2,443,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
1,027,000 |
|
|
|
239,000 |
|
Income tax benefit (provision) |
|
|
95,000 |
|
|
|
(121,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
1,122,000 |
|
|
$ |
118,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying introductory notes and notes to consolidated financial
statements
are an integral part of these consolidated statements.
39
HWCCTUNICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(wholly owned by Hollywood Casino Corporation)
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2001
|
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Casino |
|
$ |
82,308,000 |
|
|
$ |
81,974,000 |
|
Rooms |
|
|
5,004,000 |
|
|
|
5,144,000 |
|
Food and beverage |
|
|
11,841,000 |
|
|
|
13,094,000 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,342,000 |
|
|
|
1,356,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,495,000 |
|
|
|
101,568,000 |
|
Lesspromotional allowances |
|
|
(26,107,000 |
) |
|
|
(26,325,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues |
|
|
74,388,000 |
|
|
|
75,243,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Casino |
|
|
51,084,000 |
|
|
|
54,170,000 |
|
Rooms |
|
|
946,000 |
|
|
|
721,000 |
|
Food and beverage |
|
|
2,689,000 |
|
|
|
2,597,000 |
|
Other |
|
|
598,000 |
|
|
|
680,000 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
4,827,000 |
|
|
|
4,524,000 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
4,359,000 |
|
|
|
4,407,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
64,503,000 |
|
|
|
67,099,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
9,885,000 |
|
|
|
8,144,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-operating income (expenses): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
83,000 |
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
Interest expense, net of capitalized interest of $72,000 in 2002 |
|
|
(7,369,000 |
) |
|
|
(7,446,000 |
) |
Equity in losses of unconsolidated affiliate |
|
|
(161,000 |
) |
|
|
(130,000 |
) |
(Loss) gain on disposal of assets |
|
|
(190,000 |
) |
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-operating expenses, net |
|
|
(7,637,000 |
) |
|
|
(7,314,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
2,248,000 |
|
|
|
830,000 |
|
Income tax provision |
|
|
(90,000 |
) |
|
|
(221,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
2,158,000 |
|
|
$ |
609,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying introductory notes and notes to consolidated financial
statements
are an integral part of these consolidated statements.
40
HWCCTUNICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(wholly owned by Hollywood Casino Corporation)
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2001
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
2,158,000 |
|
|
$ |
609,000 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
4,359,000 |
|
|
|
4,407,000 |
|
Loss (gain) on disposal of assets |
|
|
190,000 |
|
|
|
(12,000 |
) |
Deferred income tax provision |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
(Benefit) provision for doubtful accounts |
|
|
(41,000 |
) |
|
|
1,092,000 |
|
Equity in losses of unconsolidated affiliate |
|
|
161,000 |
|
|
|
130,000 |
|
Increase in accounts receivable |
|
|
(294,000 |
) |
|
|
(330,000 |
) |
Increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
1,656,000 |
|
|
|
1,035,000 |
|
Net change in other current assets and liabilities |
|
|
(1,155,000 |
) |
|
|
(133,000 |
) |
Net change in other noncurrent assets and liabilities |
|
|
(51,000 |
) |
|
|
(45,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
6,983,000 |
|
|
|
6,763,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(6,312,000 |
) |
|
|
(3,428,000 |
) |
Proceeds from disposal of assets |
|
|
14,000 |
|
|
|
12,000 |
|
Investment in unconsolidated affiliate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(6,298,000 |
) |
|
|
(3,426,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,081,000 |
|
Repayments of long-term debt |
|
|
(522,000 |
) |
|
|
(874,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
|
|
(522,000 |
) |
|
|
207,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
163,000 |
|
|
|
3,544,000 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
19,922,000 |
|
|
|
16,038,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
20,085,000 |
|
|
$ |
19,582,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying introductory notes and notes to consolidated financial
statements
are an integral part of these consolidated statements.
41
HWCCTUNICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(wholly owned by Hollywood Casino Corporation)
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(1) |
|
Organization, Business and Basis of Presentation |
HWCC - Tunica, Inc. (HCT) is a Texas corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of Hollywood Casino Corporation (HCC), a Delaware corporation. HCT
was incorporated in December 1993 for the purpose of acquiring and completing a gaming facility in northern Tunica County, Mississippi approximately 30 miles southwest of Memphis, Tennessee. The facility (the Tunica Casino) was completed
and commenced operations on August 8, 1994 under the service mark Hollywood Casino®. The Tunica
Casino currently includes a casino with 54,000 square feet of gaming space, 505 hotel rooms and suites, a 123-space recreational vehicle park and related amenities. HCTs gaming license has been renewed by the Mississippi Gaming Commission
through October 20, 2004.
HCC, Penn National Gaming, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation (Penn
National), and P Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Penn National, entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the Merger Agreement), dated as of August 7, 2002, pursuant to which, and
subject to the conditions thereof, HCC will become a wholly owned subsidiary of Penn National through the merger of P Acquisition Corp. with and into HCC. In connection with the Merger Agreement, Penn National, HCC and certain stockholders of HCC
(who collectively control at least 50.3% of HCCs outstanding shares) executed and delivered Stockholder Agreements, pursuant to which those stockholders have, among other things, covenanted to vote in favor of the adoption of and otherwise to
support the Merger Agreement. Consequently, subject to the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement and Stockholder Agreements, holders of a majority of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of HCC eligible to vote have agreed to
vote in favor of the merger, assuring stockholder approval.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements
include the accounts of HCT and its wholly owned subsidiary, HWCC - Golf Course Partners, Inc. (Golf). All significant intercompany balances have been eliminated in consolidation. Golf, a Delaware corporation, was formed in 1996 to own
an initial one-third interest in Tunica Golf Course LLC, a limited liability company organized to develop and operate a golf course to be used by patrons of the Tunica Casino and other participating casino/hotel properties. The golf course opened
for business in November 1998. Golfs investment in Tunica Golf Course, LLC is accounted for under the equity method of accounting and is included in other noncurrent assets on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets at September 30, 2002
and December 31, 2001.
HCT estimates that a significant amount of the Tunica Casinos revenues are derived
from patrons living in the Memphis, Tennessee area, northern Mississippi and Arkansas. The Tunica Casino faces intense competition from other casinos operating in northern Tunica County and management believes that this competition will continue in
the future.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the
reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
The consolidated financial statements as of September 30, 2002 and for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2002 and 2001 have been prepared by HCT without audit. In the opinion of
42
HWCCTUNICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(wholly owned by Hollywood Casino Corporation)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
(Unaudited)
management,
these consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the consolidated financial position of HCT as of September 30, 2002, the results of its operations for the
three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2002 and 2001 and its cash flows for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2002 and 2001.
In July 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities (SFAS 146), which requires
companies to recognize costs associated with exit or disposal activities when incurred. Current literature requires that these costs be expensed when management commits to an exit or disposal plan. SFAS 146 is to be applied prospectively to exit or
disposal activities initiated after December 31, 2002. HCT does not expect the adoption of SFAS 146 to have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.
(2) |
|
Long-Term Debt and Pledge of Assets |
Substantially all of HCTs assets are pledged in connection with its long-term indebtedness. Long-term debt consists of the following:
|
|
September 30, 2002
|
|
|
December 31, 2001
|
|
11.25% Promissory note to HCC due May 1, 2007 (a) |
|
$ |
87,045,000 |
|
|
$ |
87,045,000 |
|
Note payable to HCC (a) |
|
|
329,000 |
|
|
|
329,000 |
|
Equipment loans (b) |
|
|
8,000 |
|
|
|
245,000 |
|
Bank credit facility (c) |
|
|
665,000 |
|
|
|
950,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total indebtedness |
|
|
88,047,000 |
|
|
|
88,569,000 |
|
Lesscurrent maturities |
|
|
(342,000 |
) |
|
|
(586,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt |
|
$ |
87,705,000 |
|
|
$ |
87,983,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The intercompany note was issued as of May 19, 1999 and accrues interest at the rate of 11.25% per annum. The initial borrowing on the note in the amount of
$84,045,000 replaced previous intercompany notes with HCC which accrued interest at the rate of 12.75% per annum. During October 1999, HCT borrowed the additional $3,000,000 available under the intercompany note as well as an additional $329,000
under a new note agreement with HCC to acquire and terminate its consulting agreement. Interest on advances is payable each April 15 and October 15. The intercompany note is pledged as security with respect to HCCs $360,000,000 Senior Secured
Notes due in 2006 and 2007 which are unconditionally guaranteed on a senior secured basis by HCT and by certain other current and future subsidiaries of HCC. HCCs Senior Secured Notes and related guarantees are secured by, among other things,
(1) substantially all of the assets of HCT and other future guarantors, (2) a limited lien on substantially all of the assets of another gaming facility operated by a wholly owned subsidiary of HCC, (3) a pledge of the capital stock of HCT and
certain other subsidiaries of HCC and (4) the collateral assignment of any future management contracts entered into by HCC. The |
43
HWCCTUNICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(wholly owned by Hollywood Casino Corporation)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
(Unaudited)
limitation on the lien described in (2) above was $108,000,000 at September 30, 2002 and can not be increased further.
The indenture for HCCs Senior Secured Notes contains various provisions limiting the ability of HCC, HCT and certain defined subsidiaries to, among other things, pay dividends or make other restricted payments; incur
additional indebtedness or issue preferred stock; create liens; create dividend or other payment restrictions affecting certain defined subsidiaries; enter into mergers or consolidations or make sales of all or substantially all assets of HCC, HCT
or any future guarantor; or enter into certain transactions with affiliates. Dividend payments by HCT to HCC are not restricted under the terms of the indenture.
(b) |
|
The remaining equipment loan at September 30, 2002 is payable monthly including interest at 8.75% per annum and matures in 2003.
|
(c) |
|
In June 2001, HCT entered into a bank credit facility in the amount of $3,000,000 available through June 30, 2002. Borrowings under the line of credit are
payable over a 36 month period and accrue interest at the banks prime lending rate plus .75% per annum on either a fixed or floating rate basis. Borrowings under the line of credit are collateralized by equipment purchased with the loan
proceeds. The line of credit agreement requires the provision of certain financial reports. During June 2001, HCT borrowed $731,000 under the credit facility at an interest rate of 7.5% per annum. HCT made additional borrowings of $130,000 at the
rate of 7.5% per annum in July 2001 and $220,000 at the rate of 7.25% per annum in August 2001. |
Scheduled payments of long-term debt as of September 30, 2002 are set forth below:
|
|
|
|
2002 (three months) |
|
$ |
64,000 |
2003 |
|
|
373,000 |
2004 |
|
|
236,000 |
2005 |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
87,374,000 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
88,047,000 |
|
|
|
|
Interest paid, net of amounts capitalized, amounted to $7,369,000
and $7,446,000, respectively, during the nine month periods ended September 30, 2002 and 2001.
44
HWCCTUNICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(wholly owned by Hollywood Casino Corporation)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
(Unaudited)
HCTs benefit (provision) for income taxes consists of the following:
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2001
|
|
Federal income tax benefit (provision): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
$ |
95,000 |
|
|
$ |
(153,000 |
) |
|
$ |
(90,000 |
) |
|
$ |
(211,000 |
) |
Deferred |
|
|
(291,000 |
) |
|
|
61,000 |
|
|
|
284,000 |
|
|
|
(128,000 |
) |
Change in valuation allowance |
|
|
291,000 |
|
|
|
(29,000 |
) |
|
|
(284,000 |
) |
|
|
118,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
95,000 |
|
|
$ |
(121,000 |
) |
|
$ |
(90,000 |
) |
|
$ |
(221,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State income taxes have not been provided for since a credit for
state gaming taxes based on gross revenues is allowed to offset income taxes incurred. The credit is the lesser of total gaming taxes paid or the state income tax, with no credit carryforward permitted.
HCT is included in HCCs consolidated federal income tax return. HCTs provision for federal income taxes is based on the amount
of tax which would be provided if a separate federal income tax return were filed. HCT paid federal income taxes of $816,000 and $319,000, respectively, during the nine month periods ended September 30, 2002 or 2001. HCT paid no state income taxes
during either of the nine month periods ended September 30, 2002 and 2001.
At September 30, 2002, HCT had net
operating loss carryforwards (NOLs) totaling approximately $1,864,000, which do not begin to expire until the year 2019. Additionally, HCT has alternative minimum and other tax credits available totaling $2,256,000 and $463,000,
respectively. Alternative minimum tax credits do not expire and none of the other tax credits begin to expire before the year 2009. Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, requires that the tax
benefit of such NOLs and credit carryforwards, together with the tax benefit of deferred tax assets resulting from temporary differences, be recorded as an asset and, to the extent that management can not assess that the utilization of all or
a portion of such deferred tax assets is more likely than not, a valuation allowance should be recorded. Based on the near-term expectation of minimal or no taxable income, management has provided valuation allowances to fully reserve the net
deferred tax assets at both September 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001.
Sales by HCC or existing stockholders of
common stock, or securities convertible into common stock, can cause a change of control, as defined in Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, which would limit the ability of HCC or its subsidiaries to utilize
these loss carryforwards in later tax periods. Should such a change of control occur, including upon consummation of the proposed acquisition of HCC by Penn National, the amount of loss carryforwards available for use in any one year would most
likely be substantially reduced. Future treasury regulations, administrative rulings or court decisions may also affect HCCs future utilization of its loss carryforwards.
45
HWCCTUNICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(wholly owned by Hollywood Casino Corporation)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
(Unaudited)
HCC has been informed that the Internal Revenue Service will soon open an examination of HCCs consolidated federal income tax returns for the years 1999 through 2001.
Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior years consolidated financial statements to conform to the 2002 consolidated financial statement presentation.
46
HOLLYWOOD CASINO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements about the business,
operating results, cash flows, financial condition, construction activities, expected closing of the merger with Penn National and prospects of the Company. The actual results could differ materially from those indicated by the forward-looking
statements because of various risks and uncertainties including, among other things, changes in competition, economic conditions, tax regulations, state regulations or legislation applicable to the gaming industry in general or the Company in
particular, decisions of courts, regulatory approvals and other risks indicated in the Companys filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. In addition, consummation of Penn Nationals acquisition of the Company is subject to
several conditions including the completion of Penn Nationals acquisition financing as well as the approval of various governmental entities, including gaming regulatory authorities to which the companies are subject. Such risks and
uncertainties are beyond managements ability to control and, in many cases, can not be predicted by management. When used in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the words believes, estimates, expects,
anticipates and similar expressions as they relate to the Company or its management are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Similarly, statements herein that describe the Companys business strategy, outlook,
objectives, plans, intentions or goals are also forward-looking statements.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following table summarizes HCCs consolidated income from operations reflecting departmental operations at each of its casino
properties. Departmental operations include, as applicable, casino, rooms, food and beverage and other. Accordingly, departmental profit, as used in the discussion which follows, consists of departmental revenues less departmental expenses and
represents income from operations before general and administrative expenses, depreciation and amortization. Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior years presentation to conform to the 2002 periods presentation.
47
HOLLYWOOD CASINO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30,
|
|
Nine Months Ended September
30,
|
|
|
2002
|
|
2001
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2001
|
Net Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aurora Casino |
|
$ |
67,043,000 |
|
$ |
54,300,000 |
|
$ |
191,126,000 |
|
|
$ |
160,177,000 |
Tunica Casino |
|
|
26,179,000 |
|
|
25,035,000 |
|
|
74,388,000 |
|
|
|
75,243,000 |
Shreveport Casino |
|
|
36,780,000 |
|
|
37,176,000 |
|
|
111,299,000 |
|
|
|
110,915,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues |
|
|
130,002,000 |
|
|
116,511,000 |
|
|
376,813,000 |
|
|
|
346,335,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Departmental Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aurora Casino |
|
|
48,972,000 |
|
|
34,588,000 |
|
|
125,628,000 |
|
|
|
102,782,000 |
Tunica Casino |
|
|
19,317,000 |
|
|
19,707,000 |
|
|
55,317,000 |
|
|
|
58,168,000 |
Shreveport Casino |
|
|
30,634,000 |
|
|
31,088,000 |
|
|
89,164,000 |
|
|
|
107,107,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total departmental expenses |
|
|
98,923,000 |
|
|
85,383,000 |
|
|
270,109,000 |
|
|
|
268,057,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Departmental profit |
|
|
31,079,000 |
|
|
31,128,000 |
|
|
106,704,000 |
|
|
|
78,278,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Operating Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative |
|
|
8,939,000 |
|
|
7,250,000 |
|
|
26,055,000 |
|
|
|
24,956,000 |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
8,178,000 |
|
|
13,641,000 |
|
|
33,239,000 |
|
|
|
36,797,000 |
Development |
|
|
9,000 |
|
|
149,000 |
|
|
69,000 |
|
|
|
459,000 |
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
195,000 |
|
|
|
843,000 |
Loss on affiliate obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
800,000 |
|
|
|
|
Executive compensation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(709,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other operating expenses |
|
|
17,126,000 |
|
|
21,040,000 |
|
|
59,649,000 |
|
|
|
63,055,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
$ |
13,953,000 |
|
$ |
10,088,000 |
|
$ |
47,055,000 |
|
|
$ |
15,223,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48
HOLLYWOOD CASINO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Aurora Casino
Departmental profit from operations at the Aurora Casino is summarized in the following table:
|
|
Three Months Ended September
30,
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September
30,
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2001
|
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Casino |
|
$ |
71,453,000 |
|
|
$ |
58,444,000 |
|
|
$ |
203,711,000 |
|
|
$ |
171,925,000 |
|
Food and beverage |
|
|
3,923,000 |
|
|
|
3,507,000 |
|
|
|
11,183,000 |
|
|
|
10,905,000 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,210,000 |
|
|
|
779,000 |
|
|
|
3,035,000 |
|
|
|
2,329,000 |
|
Promotional allowances |
|
|
(9,543,000 |
) |
|
|
(8,430,000 |
) |
|
|
(26,803,000 |
) |
|
|
(24,982,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues |
|
|
67,043,000 |
|
|
|
54,300,000 |
|
|
|
191,126,000 |
|
|
|
160,177,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Departmental Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Casino |
|
|
47,189,000 |
|
|
|
33,018,000 |
|
|
|
120,444,000 |
|
|
|
97,988,000 |
|
Food and beverage |
|
|
1,350,000 |
|
|
|
1,308,000 |
|
|
|
4,171,000 |
|
|
|
4,084,000 |
|
Other |
|
|
433,000 |
|
|
|
262,000 |
|
|
|
1,013,000 |
|
|
|
710,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total departmental expenses |
|
|
48,972,000 |
|
|
|
34,588,000 |
|
|
|
125,628,000 |
|
|
|
102,782,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Departmental profit |
|
$ |
18,071,000 |
|
|
$ |
19,712,000 |
|
|
$ |
65,498,000 |
|
|
$ |
57,395,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Departmental profit margin |
|
|
27 |
% |
|
|
36.3 |
% |
|
|
34.3 |
% |
|
|
35.8 |
% |
Revenues
Prior to February 15, 2002, the Aurora Casino conducted its gaming operations on two riverboats connected by a link barge. The smaller of
the two riverboats contained slightly more than one-third of the total gaming positions, but generated less than 25% of total gaming revenues. As more fully described under Liquidity and Capital Resources - Capital Expenditures and Other
Investing Activities, the Aurora Casino began a major expansion in 2001. In order to take better advantage of dockside gaming legislation passed in 1999 and improve its gaming amenities, the Aurora Casino began construction of a new dockside
facility to replace the Aurora Casinos two riverboats. Management believed the new dockside facility would significantly increase passenger capacity and provide a premier gaming and entertainment facility for the Aurora Casinos patrons.
The first half of the dockside facility and a new casino entrance were completed and opened on February 15, 2002. A new, state-of-the-art buffet with the latest in presentation cooking and 27% additional seating capacity opened in May 2002. The
second half of the dockside casino opened June 14, 2002. In late June 2002, a new parking facility opened which increased parking capacity by approximately 30%. The total expansion project cost approximately $76.5 million.
Total gross wagering at the Aurora casino, as measured by the total value of chips purchased for table games (drop) and the
total amount of coins wagered in slot machines (handle), increased $139.3 million (16.9%) and $320.6 million (13%), respectively, during the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2002 compared to the same periods in 2001. The
increases in gross wagering are primarily attributable to the opening of the dockside casino. In addition, the mix of games has been altered with the addition of 50 slot machines in place of eight table games.
49
HOLLYWOOD CASINO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Casino revenues consist of the portion of gross wagering
retained by the casino and, as a percentage of gross wagering, is referred to as the hold percentage. Third quarter 2002 casino revenues benefitted from the gross wagering increase and an increase in the slot machine hold percentage, but
were partially offset by a decrease in the table games hold percentage. The increase in casino revenues during the first nine months of 2002 compared to the prior year period reflects the increase in gross wagering, coupled with an increase in the
slot machine hold percentage. The Aurora Casino set a new monthly record for casino revenues in February 2002 with the mid-month opening of the first half of the new dockside casino; a new monthly revenue record was subsequently established in
March. Monthly revenues during the second quarter of 2002 declined from the record March figures, reflecting seasonal patterns, but averaged more than 19% above the average second quarter 2001 monthly revenues. These record results were achieved
despite the disruption from construction of the propertys new buffet and the completion of the second half of its dockside casino. Prior to the mid-June completion of the dockside casino, the majority of the Aurora Casinos gaming
positions continued to be located on the remaining riverboat rather than on the first half of the dockside casino. The third quarter represented the first full quarter of operations on the completed dockside casino and combined with an aggressive
marketing campaign resulted in the Aurora Casino setting a quarterly casino revenue record of $71.5 million, a 22.3% increase over the third quarter of 2001. The strong revenue growth in the third quarter was achieved despite deteriorating economic
conditions in the Chicago-are market and increased competition from riverboat operators in norther Indiana where dockside gaming was introduced in August of 2002. Competition is expected to intensify next year as a riverboat operator in Joliet,
Illinois has recently announced a $40 million barge-based casino renovation project expected to be completed by the end of the first quarter of 2003.
Food and beverage revenues increased 11.9% during the third quarter of 2002 compared to the same period in 2001 bringing the nine month revenues in line with the preceding year. The increase in patron
volume during the third quarter following the completion of the dockside casino in June and the opening of the new buffet in May was accompanied by an increase in food and beverage pricing. These increased revenues were partially offset as during
the 2002 first quarter period, one restaurant facility was closed and two restaurant facilities were relocated as part of the dockside construction activities discussed above. A second food outlet was closed effective July 1, 2002 as a cost savings
measure in response to the newly imposed gaming tax increase (see Departmental Expenses below).
Other
revenues increased 55.3% and 30.3%, respectively, during the third quarter and first nine months of 2002 compared to the same periods in 2001. Such increases reflect additional commissions earned from ATM fees and credit card advances as a result of
the increased patron volume.
Promotional allowances include the estimated value of goods and services provided
free of charge to casino customers under various marketing programs, the cost of certain cash incentive programs and the estimated cost of the cash back award feature of the casinos customer loyalty program. Promotional allowances
increased by 13.2% during the third quarter of 2002 compared to the prior year period resulting in a 7.3% increase for the 2002 nine month period. The third quarter increase reflects increases in both promotional activities and customer loyalty
program awards. During the first six months of 2002, customer loyalty programs accounted for most of the increase.
Departmental Expenses
The 42.9% and 22.9% increases in casino expenses during the third
quarter and first nine months of 2002 compared to the prior year periods reflect higher gaming and admissions taxes combined with the additional patron volume from the opening of the dockside casino. Gaming and admission taxes for the third quarter
and nine month period ended September 30, 2002 increased by $13.7 million (74.5%)
50
HOLLYWOOD CASINO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
and $20.7 million (38.1%), respectively, compared to the prior year periods. Gaming
taxes imposed by the state of Illinois are determined using a graduated tax rate applied to the licensees gaming revenues. Effective July 1, 2002, the State of Illinois increased the graduated tax rate structure by increasing certain tax
rates, adding new tax brackets and raising the highest marginal tax rate from 35% to 50%. This highest marginal tax rate applies to annual adjusted gross receipts, as defined, in excess of $200 million. In addition, the State increased
the admissions tax from $2 per person to $3 per person. These changes resulted in increased taxes amounting to $9.1 million for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2002. Excluding this $9.1 million increase in taxes, casino expenses
increased by 15.3% and 13.6%, respectively, for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2002 compared to the prior year periods, more closely approximating the increase in patron volume as reflected by the 16.9% and 13% increases in
gross wagering. Management anticipates that gaming and admission taxes will continue to be significantly higher than the prior year for the remainder of 2002 and the first half of 2003 as the increase in taxes will continue to be magnified by
increased revenues from the completed dockside facility. Management has conducted a thorough review of its operations and is eliminating marginal marketing programs and implementing cost controls, as necessary, to mitigate to the extent possible the
negative impact on profitability resulting from the tax increases. Marketing expenses increased by $283,000 and $1.2 million, respectively, during the third quarter and first nine months of 2002 compared to the prior year periods primarily due to
additional television and radio production and television advertising in anticipation of the opening of the second half of the dockside casino.
Food and beverage expenses did not change significantly during the third quarter and first nine months of 2002 compared to the same periods in 2001 despite the third quarter increase in the associated
revenues. Food costs did not increase proportionately with the increase in the associated revenues as the food outlets closed during the period represented those with a higher percentage food cost.
Other expenses increased by $171,000 (65.3%) and $303,000 (42.7%), respectively, during the third quarter and first nine months of 2002
compared to the same periods in 2001 reflecting increases in theater entertainment expenses and non-allocable payroll costs.
51
HOLLYWOOD CASINO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Tunica Casino
Departmental profit from operations at the Tunica Casino is summarized in the following table:
|
|
Three Months Ended September
30,
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September
30,
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2001
|
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Casino |
|
$ |
29,110,000 |
|
|
$ |
27,576,000 |
|
|
$ |
82,308,000 |
|
|
$ |
81,974,000 |
|
Rooms |
|
|
1,674,000 |
|
|
|
1,888,000 |
|
|
|
5,004,000 |
|
|
|
5,144,000 |
|
Food and beverage |
|
|
4,232,000 |
|
|
|
4,496,000 |
|
|
|
11,841,000 |
|
|
|
13,094,000 |
|
Other |
|
|
522,000 |
|
|
|
469,000 |
|
|
|
1,342,000 |
|
|
|
1,356,000 |
|
Promotional allowances |
|
|
(9,359,000 |
) |
|
|
(9,394,000 |
) |
|
|
(26,107,000 |
) |
|
|
(26,325,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues |
|
|
26,179,000 |
|
|
|
25,035,000 |
|
|
|
74,388,000 |
|
|
|
75,243,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Departmental Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Casino |
|
|
17,878,000 |
|
|
|
18,361,000 |
|
|
|
51,084,000 |
|
|
|
54,170,000 |
|
Rooms |
|
|
302,000 |
|
|
|
233,000 |
|
|
|
946,000 |
|
|
|
721,000 |
|
Food and beverage |
|
|
917,000 |
|
|
|
884,000 |
|
|
|
2,689,000 |
|
|
|
2,597,000 |
|
Other |
|
|
220,000 |
|
|
|
229,000 |
|
|
|
598,000 |
|
|
|
680,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total departmental expenses |
|
|
19,317,000 |
|
|
|
19,707,000 |
|
|
|
55,317,000 |
|
|
|
58,168,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Departmental profit |
|
$ |
6,862,000 |
|
|
$ |
5,328,000 |
|
|
$ |
19,071,000 |
|
|
$ |
17,075,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Departmental profit margin |
|
|
26.2 |
% |
|
|
21.3 |
% |
|
|
25.6 |
% |
|
|
22.7 |
% |
Revenues
Total gross wagering at the Tunica Casino increased by $20.3 million (4.2%) during the three month period ended September 30, 2002
compared to the same period in 2001 bringing the nine month total in line with the prior year amount. The Tunica market continues to be a highly competitive market in which to operate. Slot machine revenues increased over the comparable prior year
periods due to improved slot machine handle even though slot machine hold percentages did not change significantly from the 2001 periods. Table game revenues improved during the third quarter primarily due to improvement in the table games hold
percentage, bringing the nine month revenues in line with the prior year period.
Room revenues decreased $214,000
(11.3%) during the third quarter period of 2002 as compared to the same period of 2001 reflecting the removal from service of a number of rooms as part of the hotel room renovation project currently underway at the Tunica Casino (see Liquidity
and Capital ResourcesCapital Expenditures and Other Investing Activities below). Rooms revenue remained virtually unchanged during the nine month period ended September 30, 2002 compared to 2001. Hotel occupancy rates, which are based on
the number of rooms available, increased to 95.4% and 89.5%, respectively, during the 2002 periods from 91.9% and 89.1%, respectively, during the prior year periods. The average daily room rate decreased to $39 in the 2002 three month period from
$41 in the 2001 period, but averaged $39 for both the 2002 and 2001 nine month periods.
Food and beverage
revenues decreased 5.9% and 9.6%, respectively, during the third quarter and first nine months of 2002 compared to the prior year periods primarily due to a reduction in food and beverage complimentaries. Other revenues increased 11.3% in the third
quarter of 2002 compared to the
52
HOLLYWOOD CASINO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
prior year period bringing the nine month period in line with 2001, primarily due to an
increase in retail complimentaries during the third quarter.
Promotional allowances include the estimated value
of goods and services provided free of charge to casino customers under various marketing programs, the cost of certain cash incentive programs and the estimated cost of the cash back award feature of the casinos customer loyalty
program. Promotional allowances did not change significantly during either of the three or nine month periods ended September 30, 2002 as compared to the same periods of 2001. The increase in retail complimentaries was offset by the decrease in
complimentaries for food and beverage.
Departmental Expenses
The 2.6% and 5.7% decreases in casino expenses during the third quarter and first nine months of 2002 compared to the same periods in 2001
primarily result from decreases in advertising and other expenses as part of managements efforts to control costs in a highly competitive market. Additional decreases reflect reductions in the allocation of costs associated with promotional
activities from the food and beverage department to the casino department.
The increases in rooms expense of
29.6% and 31.2%, respectively, during the third quarter and first nine months of 2002 compared to the prior year periods result from increases in operating costs coupled with reductions in the allocation of such expenses to the casino department.
Food and beverage expenses increased only slightly during the third quarter and first nine months of 2002
compared to the same periods in 2001 despite decreases in the associated revenues. The declines in revenues resulted from reductions in promotional activities; accordingly, allocations of food and beverage costs to the casino department were also
reduced. Other departmental expenses decreased by 3.9% and 12.1%, respectively, during the 2002 three and nine months periods as a result of increased allocations to the casino department.
53
HOLLYWOOD CASINO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Shreveport Casino
Departmental profit from operations at the Shreveport Casino is summarized in the following table:
|
|
Three Months Ended September
30,
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September
30,
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2001
|
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Casino |
|
$ |
36,695,000 |
|
|
$ |
36,873,000 |
|
|
$ |
110,914,000 |
|
|
$ |
111,519,000 |
|
Rooms |
|
|
2,423,000 |
|
|
|
2,426,000 |
|
|
|
7,033,000 |
|
|
|
6,546,000 |
|
Food and beverage |
|
|
6,453,000 |
|
|
|
6,769,000 |
|
|
|
18,795,000 |
|
|
|
20,225,000 |
|
Other |
|
|
773,000 |
|
|
|
721,000 |
|
|
|
1,867,000 |
|
|
|
2,861,000 |
|
Promotional allowances |
|
|
(9,564,000 |
) |
|
|
(9,613,000 |
) |
|
|
(27,310,000 |
) |
|
|
(30,236,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues |
|
|
36,780,000 |
|
|
|
37,176,000 |
|
|
|
111,299,000 |
|
|
|
110,915,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Departmental Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Casino |
|
|
27,654,000 |
|
|
|
27,919,000 |
|
|
|
80,078,000 |
|
|
|
94,784,000 |
|
Rooms |
|
|
502,000 |
|
|
|
621,000 |
|
|
|
1,688,000 |
|
|
|
1,827,000 |
|
Food and beverage |
|
|
1,699,000 |
|
|
|
1,950,000 |
|
|
|
5,170,000 |
|
|
|
7,358,000 |
|
Other |
|
|
779,000 |
|
|
|
598,000 |
|
|
|
2,228,000 |
|
|
|
3,138,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total departmental expenses |
|
|
30,634,000 |
|
|
|
31,088,000 |
|
|
|
89,164,000 |
|
|
|
107,107,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Departmental profit |
|
$ |
6,146,000 |
|
|
$ |
6,088,000 |
|
|
$ |
22,135,000 |
|
|
$ |
3,808,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Departmental profit margin |
|
|
16.7 |
% |
|
|
16.4 |
% |
|
|
19.9 |
% |
|
|
3.4 |
% |
The Shreveport Casino commenced operations on December 20, 2000 and
experienced the typical operating inefficiencies associated with the opening of a new, major resort. In addition, management sought to open the Shreveport Casino during December 2000 in order to capitalize on one of the busiest times of the year.
Construction delays resulted in a severe reduction in the time available to finalize preparations to open the facility and to train personnel. This lack of adequate preparation and training time, combined with a difficult labor market in Shreveport
and the large volume of business generated by the property during its first 12 days of operations in 2000, exacerbated the operating inefficiencies. As a result, management concentrated its efforts in January and early February 2001 on fully
implementing operating and training programs to ensure that customers were provided with a superior level of service. With these programs completed, the Shreveport Casino launched major marketing programs in late February and March. Delays in
commencing its marketing efforts, together with inclement weather and increased competitive pressures in the Shreveport market, resulted in lower gaming activity at the Shreveport Casino in January and February 2001 than originally anticipated by
management. With the implementation of its marketing programs, the Shreveport Casino experienced a favorable trend in its gaming revenues with significant increases in February and March compared to the prior month periods. Revenues continued to
show improvement in April and May; however, these increases remained below management expectations, primarily due to the economic slowdown. Management of the Shreveport Partnership responded by fine-tuning its marketing efforts to maximize the
effectiveness of its marketing programs while minimizing their costs. To this end, the Shreveport Partnership terminated certain marketing programs that targeted less profitable market segments which resulted in a reduction of the Shreveport
Casinos gaming revenues in June. Management also instituted a series of measures to significantly reduce the operating costs of the Shreveport Casino. As a result of the elimination of
54
HOLLYWOOD CASINO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
marketing programs and other significant cost cutting efforts, the Shreveport Casino
has generated positive earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and non-recurring items in every month since June 2001. The Shreveport Partnership is continuing to aggressively manage its marketing programs to increase its
customer base while maximizing near and long-term profitability by decreasing the operating cost structure of the property.
The opening of the Shreveport Casino increased gaming capacity in the Shreveport/Bossier City market by approximately 32%. However, the market has not yet been able to fully absorb the increase in capacity, as total casino win for
the first nine months of 2002 has only grown by 19.6% compared to the same period in 2000 (the most recent comparable nine month period prior to the opening of the Shreveport Casino). The market grew by only 1.6% during the first nine months of 2002
and suffered a decline of 1.7% during the 2002 third quarter period compared to the same periods in 2001. Management believes the third quarter decline reflects the deteriorating economic conditions in the principal feeder markets to the
Shreveport/Bossier City gaming market, including the Dallas/Ft. Worth metropolitan area. Management further expects the difficult market conditions will continue through the fourth quarter of 2002 and, as a result, the Shreveport Casino will report
lower earnings and operating cash flows in the upcoming quarter. In late August 2002, Harrahs Entertainment Inc. announced plans to purchase Louisiana Downs racetrack located approximately nine miles from the Shreveport Casino in Bossier City,
Louisiana. Announced plans include a casino addition at the racetrack which, pending a timely completion of the deal, could open in the summer of 2003. The successful completion and opening of this facility would result in another source of
competition for and could have a material adverse affect on the Shreveport Casino.
Total gross wagering at the
Shreveport Casino as measured by table game drop and slot machine handle amounted to $472.9 million and $436.1 million, respectively, during the third quarters of 2002 and 2001 and $1,390.6 million and $1,352.6 million, respectively, during the nine
month periods ended September 30, 2002 and 2001. Slot machine handle increased by 11.2% and 4.6%, respectively, during the third quarter and first nine months of 2002 compared to the same periods in 2001, while table game drop declined by 10.7% and
10.4%, respectively, during the same periods.
Revenues
Casino revenues at the Shreveport Casino decreased slightly during the three and nine month periods of 2002 compared to the 2001 periods.
Decreases in the slot machine hold percentages during the three and nine month periods of 2002 from the 2001 periods were offset by increases in slot machine gross wagering. As a result, slot machine revenues increased by 1.7% during the three month
period ended September 30, 2002 bringing the nine month revenues in line with the 2001 nine month period. The third quarter 2002 decline in table games gross wagering was compounded by a decline in the table games hold percentage to 16.4% from
17.6%. For the nine month period, the decrease in table game wagering was partially offset by an increase in the table games hold percentage to 19.1% in 2002 from 18.2% in 2001. During the three and nine month periods of 2002, slot machine revenues
accounted for 75.1% and 73.6% of casino revenues, respectively, compared to 73.5% and 73.2%, respectively, during the 2001 periods. Table game revenues accounted for 22.2% and 25.4%, respectively, of the 2002 period casino revenues compared to 26.5%
and 26.8%, respectively, during the 2001 periods. In June 2002, the Shreveport Casino added six poker stations which contributed $983,000 and $1.1 million, respectively, to casino revenues during the three and nine month 2002 periods.
Room revenues remained constant during the three month period of 2002 compared to 2001 and increased 7.4% during the 2002 nine
month period compared to the same period in 2001. Hotel occupancy rates increased to 95.1% and 93.9% during the 2002 three and nine month periods from 93%
55
HOLLYWOOD CASINO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
and 85.7% in the same periods of 2001 due to more aggressive marketing programs.
However, the average daily room rate decreased to $69 and $68, respectively, during the 2002 three and nine month periods from $70 and $72 in the comparable 2001 periods. Room rates in 2002 have been lowered to meet competitive pressures in the
Shreveport/Bossier City marketplace; however, such reductions have been more than offset by the improvement in hotel occupancy.
Food and beverage revenues decreased 4.7% and 7.1%, respectively, during the third quarter and first nine months of 2002 compared to the prior year periods primarily as a result of decreases in promotional activities.
Other revenues increased 7.2% during the three month period ended September 30, 2002 compared to the same period in 2001
bringing the nine month period decrease to 34.7%. The third quarter increase reflects the first full quarter of rental income earned with respect to restaurant and entertainment facilities operating in space leased from the Shreveport Casino. The
year to date decrease is primarily due to reductions in theater revenues and retail store sales.
Promotional
allowances represent the estimated value of goods and services provided free of charge to casino customers under various marketing programs, the cost of certain cash incentive programs and the estimated cost of the cash back award
feature of the casinos customer loyalty programs. Promotional allowances remained unchanged during the third quarter and decreased $2.9 million (9.7%) during the first nine months of 2002 compared to the same periods in 2001. The third quarter
period includes reductions in complimentaries offset by increases in the cash back feature of the Shreveport Casinos customer loyalty programs resulting from increases in slot machine wagering. The nine month decrease is primarily
due to reductions in complimentaries as part of managements cost savings initiatives, many of which were instituted during the second half of 2001.
Departmental Expenses
The Shreveport Casino was designed
to be a major destination resort. Accordingly, its initial cost structure was based on the facility generating a significant level of gaming revenues. As noted previously, management concentrated its efforts in January and early February 2001 on
fully implementing operating and training programs to ensure that customers were provided with a superior level of service. Because the Shreveport Casino was in a longer start up phase, departmental expense ratios during the first half of 2001 were
higher than those experienced by other HCC operated gaming facilities during their initial periods. During the summer of 2001, management initiated a new business plan for the Shreveport Casino in response to the difficult operating conditions
experienced by the property. Due to the economic recession and the impact of the events of September 11th, the Shreveport market grew much more slowly in 2001 than anticipated and experienced a significant increase in marketing and promotional activity. Over the second half of 2001 and first nine months of 2002, management
made significant progress in achieving the principal elements of its new business plan. Specifically, departmental expenditures have been significantly reduced while maintaining the Shreveport Casinos level of service. Management reduced the
propertys operating costs in the first nine months of 2002 by approximately $17.9 million (16.8%) compared to the same period of 2001, while maintaining revenue levels.
In March 2001, the Louisiana legislature approved an increase in the gaming tax on riverboat casinos to 21.5% of net gaming proceeds from 18.5%. The tax increase is being
phased in over a 25-month period for all riverboats in the Shreveport/Bossier City area; accordingly, the gaming tax imposed on the Shreveport Casino increased to 19.5% effective April 1, 2001 and to 20.5% effective April 1, 2002 with an additional
1% increase scheduled for April 1, 2003. Had the entire 3% gaming tax increase been
56
HOLLYWOOD CASINO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
in effect during the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2002, the
Shreveport Casinos operating expenses would have increased by $375,000 and $1.5 million, respectively.
Casino expenses during the third quarter did not change significantly. The 15.5% decrease in casino expenses during the first nine months of 2002 compared to the same period in 2001 is due to managements cost savings
initiatives discussed above. Expenditures were reduced in the areas of payroll, cage operations, and advertising, as well as in the allocations of promotional related costs from other operating departments to the casino department.
Rooms expense decreased 19.2% and 7.6% during the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2002, respectively, compared
to the same periods of 2001. These decreases reflect managements cost savings initiatives discussed above partially offset by increased occupancy costs.
During the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2002, food and beverage expenses decreased by 12.9% and 29.7%, respectively, compared to the prior year periods. These decreases are due to
reductions in the cost of goods sold, consistent with the reductions in revenues, as well as to reductions in payroll costs and increases in operating efficiency.
Other expenses increased $181,000 (30.3%) during the three month period ended September 30, 2002 compared to the same period of 2001 bringing the nine month decrease to
$910,000 (29%). The third quarter increase is primarily due to increased insurance costs. The nine month decrease reflects reductions in the cost of goods sold, consistent with the reductions in revenues, reductions in payroll costs and a reduction
in the costs incurred in connection with headliner entertainment shows.
Other Consolidated Items
Other operating expenses of HCC and its subsidiaries, exclusive of casino departmental expenses, consist primarily of general
and administrative expenses, depreciation and amortization, and development expenses incurred in connection with the pursuit of additional gaming venues.
General and Administrative
General and administrative
expenses increased by $1.7 million (23.3%) and $1.1 million (4.4%), respectively, during the third quarter and first nine months of 2002 compared to the prior year periods. Such expenses at the Aurora Casino increased by $219,000 (16.7%) and
$798,000 (20.8%), respectively, during the 2002 periods. Such increases were primarily due to severance costs accrued in connection with managements efforts to reduce personnel expenses in order to mitigate the impact of the aforementioned
gaming and admission tax increases and to increases in legal and other administrative costs. The Tunica Casino experienced increases in general and administrative expenses of $388,000 (31.5%) and $303,000 (6.7%), respectively, during the 2002
periods compared to the prior year periods primarily as a result of increases in certain insurance and other administrative costs. During the 2002 periods, the Shreveport Casinos general and administrative expenses decreased $270,000 (11.3%)
and $3.8 million (41.5%), respectively, exclusive of management fees payable to a subsidiary of HCC. These decreases are attributable to reductions in personnel costs resulting from managements cost savings initiatives. Corporate general and
administrative expenses increased $1.4 million (58.4%) and $3.8 million (50.8%), respectively, due to increased legal and professional fees primarily related to (1) litigation against certain former executive officers of HCC and (2) the announced
Merger Agreement whereby HCC, subject to the conditions thereof, will become a wholly owned subsidiary of Penn National.
57
HOLLYWOOD CASINO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization expense decreased by $5.5 million (40%) during the third quarter of 2002 compared to the same period in 2001
resulting in a nine month decrease of $3.6 million (9.7%). Virtually all of these fluctuations result from changes in depreciation expense recorded by the Aurora Casino as a result of its expansion and the acceleration of depreciation on the assets
to be replaced (see Liquidity and Capital ResourcesCapital Expenditures and Investing ActivitiesAurora Casino below). The accelerated depreciation, which commenced in March 2001, ended with the opening of the dockside casino
and the retirement from service of the Aurora Casinos two riverboats in February and June 2002. Accordingly, third quarter 2002 depreciation expense at the Aurora Casino decreased by $5.7 million compared to the same period in 2001, offsetting
the increase reported for the first six months of 2002 and resulting in a nine month depreciation expense decrease of $3.7 million compared to the same period in 2001.
Development Expenses
Development expenses represent costs incurred in connection with HCCs pursuit of potential gaming opportunities in jurisdictions where gaming has not been legalized and abroad. Such costs decreased by 94% and 85%, respectively,
during the third quarter and first nine months of 2002 compared to the prior year periods due to fewer potential jurisdictions contemplating the legalization of gaming.
Loss on Early Extinguishment of Debt
The City of Aurora recently completed a refinancing of its underlying bond issue which reduced the effective annual interest rate on one of the Aurora Casinos capital lease agreements to approximately 5.6%. In accordance with
the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 22, Changes in the Provisions of Lease Agreements Resulting from Refundings of Tax-Exempt Debt, the outstanding capital lease obligation was increased by $195,000 to
reflect the revised present value of future minimum lease payments using the new effective interest rate and a corresponding loss on early extinguishment of debt was recorded during the second quarter of 2002. Although the principal amount of the
capital lease obligation was increased by $195,000, interest savings subsequent to the refinance date will ultimately reduce cash payment obligations by approximately $761,000.
During June 2001, the Shreveport Partnership retired its outstanding lease financing with a portion of the proceeds from the Shreveport Senior Secured Notes. The loss from
early extinguishment of debt consists of the write off of unamortized deferred finance costs associated with the lease financing.
Loss on Affiliate Obligations
During December 2001, HCC and Greate Bay reached an
agreement to restructure obligations existing between the two companies. Greate Bay was insolvent and, together with certain of its subsidiaries, filed voluntary petitions for protection under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code on
December 28, 2001. As part of its pre-packaged bankruptcy reorganization, Greate Bay sold its primary asset, with the net proceeds from the sale and Greate Bays other remaining cash to be distributed to an unrestricted subsidiary of HCC.
Greate Bay paid $2 million in December 2001 to the unrestricted subsidiary and agreed to offset $2.4 million owed by HCC against a like amount owed to HCC. The sale of Greate Bays primary asset was approved by the bankruptcy court on March 6,
2002 and was completed on March 19, 2002. During the second quarter of 2002, Greate Bay, in order to ensure timely confirmation by the bankruptcy court, agreed to amend its plan of reorganization to include
58
HOLLYWOOD CASINO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
payment to LVSI of $1.5 million for a previously disputed claim. The plan of
reorganization was confirmed in July 2002 and HCC received payment from Greate Bay totaling $13.2 million. Management anticipates the receipt of an additional $1 million upon release of an escrow account during the third quarter of 2003. Costs and
fees incurred or anticipated by HCC are expected to total approximately $2.1 million. Primarily as a result of Greate Bays settlement of the disputed LVSI claim, HCC recorded an adjustment to the carrying value of its receivables from Greate
Bay in the amount of $800,000 as a loss on affiliate obligations during the second quarter of 2002.
Executive
Compensation Adjustment
At December 31, 2001, HCC estimated and recorded an accrual for all remaining
obligations to certain former executive officers under their employment and consulting agreements. Certain assumptions made in determining the amount of the accrual were reviewed during the second quarter of 2002 and an adjustment in the amount of
$709,000 was credited as executive compensation adjustment at that time. As a result of certain Stockholder Agreements entered into in August 2002 in connection with the announced Merger Agreement whereby HCC, subject to the conditions thereof, will
become a wholly owned subsidiary of Penn National, the former executive officers agreed to settle their outstanding obligations under the employment and consulting agreements at closing of the merger for the adjusted balance less any subsequent
payments received under their employment and consulting agreements. The remaining obligation at September 30, 2002 is $6.8 million.
Non-operating Income (Expenses)
Interest Income
Interest income decreased 65.5% and 73%, respectively, during the third quarter and first nine months of 2002 compared to the prior year
periods. Such decreases were due to the unexpended cash proceeds of HCCs issue of Senior Secured Notes on May 19, 1999 and Hollywood Casino Shreveports debt issue on August 10, 1999 (see Liquidity and Capital Resources - Financing
Activities) being spent in connection with the construction of the Shreveport Casino and the Aurora Casino expansion project and to the overall decline in interest rates.
Interest Expense
Interest
expense increased slightly during the three nine month period ended September 30, 2002 compared to the prior year period bringing the nine month total in line with the comparable 2001 period. The three month increase was primarily due to a third
quarter 2001 adjustment to the estimated accrual of interest on federal income taxes payable and to less interest capitalized during 2002 with respect to the Tunica Casino hotel renovation project than was capitalized in the prior year with respect
to the Aurora Casino expansion project.
Write Off Investment in Unconsolidated Affiliate
The Shreveport Partnership entered into an agreement with a third party during 2000 providing for the joint construction and
ownership of a golf course. Contributions by the Shreveport Partnership to the limited liability corporation formed to develop and operate the golf course from inception amounted to $313,000. No contributions were made during 2002. Given the
difficult market conditions, the partners in the golf course provided notice in April 2002 that they were terminating the lease for the land on which the golf course would have been constructed. Accordingly, the Shreveport Partnership provided a
59
HOLLYWOOD CASINO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
reserve during April 2002 of $313,000 to write down its investment in the limited
liability corporation to a zero value. The partners terminated the joint venture effective as of September 30, 2002.
Income Taxes
Under the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109,
Accounting for Income Taxes, the tax benefit of NOLs and tax credit carryforwards, together with the tax benefit of deferred tax assets resulting from temporary differences, is to be recorded as an asset and, to the extent that
management can not assess that the utilization of all or a portion of such NOLs and deferred tax assets is more likely than not, a valuation allowance is to be recorded. Based on the significant amount of NOLs available ($70.7 million)
and the near-term expectation of taxable losses, management has provided a valuation allowance to reserve substantially all of the net deferred tax asset at September 30, 2002. The remaining net deferred tax asset ($268,000) relates to state timing
differences expected to reverse.
On March 19, 2002, new tax legislation was enacted which extends the carryback
period for NOLs originating in tax years ending in 2001 or 2002. As a result of this change, the Company will be able to utilize NOLs originating in 2001 to request a refund of taxes previously paid in the amount of approximately $3
million. The refund receivable and related tax benefit were recognized during the first quarter of 2002.
Sales by
HCC or existing stockholders of common stock, or securities convertible into common stock, can cause a change of control, as defined in Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, which would limit the ability of HCC or
its subsidiaries to utilize these loss carryforwards in later tax periods. Should such a change of control occur, including upon consummation of the proposed acquisition of HCC by Penn National, the amount of loss carryforwards available for use in
any one year would most likely be substantially reduced. Future treasury regulations, administrative rulings or court decisions may also affect HCCs future utilization of its loss carryforwards.
HCC has been informed that the Internal Revenue Service will soon open an examination of HCCs consolidated federal income tax
returns for the years 1999 through 2001.
Minority Interest in Hollywood Casino Shreveport
In accordance with the terms of its joint venture agreement, HCCs joint venture partner is to receive,
among other things, an amount equal to 1% of complex net revenues, as defined, earned by the Shreveport Casino. Allocations of this interest are reflected as minority interest in Hollywood Casino Shreveport. Such interest, which
commenced upon the opening of the Shreveport Casino, amounted to $367,000 and $1.1 million, respectively, during the third quarter and first nine months of 2002.
Other Items
Contingency
HCC previously was notified that the Louisiana State Police, Casino Gaming Division (the Division) had set a hearing regarding
testimony of a third party given in a court proceeding which may be in conflict with testimony provided by Jack E. Pratt, a current director of HCC, to representatives of the Division. Prior to such a hearing, HCCs Louisiana licensee
subsidiary, the Shreveport Partnership, and the Division have entered into an agreement in which, among other things, the Shreveport Partnership acknowledges no violation of law but agrees to pay to the Division the sum of $200,000. The
60
HOLLYWOOD CASINO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
agreement is subject to the approval of the Louisiana Gaming Control Board and only
effective upon consummation of the announced merger of HCC and Penn National. If the Louisiana Gaming Control Board does not approve the agreement or the merger is not consummated, the respective parties to the agreement will be in the same position
they were in prior to entering into the agreement and, absent another settlement, a hearing on the subject matters would likely proceed. In such event, while statutory authority provides that a hearing officer at such a hearing may impose a penalty
on the Shreveport Partnership and/or suspend, revoke or restrict its license, the Shreveport Partnership would aggressively defend against any such action.
Seasonality and Other Fluctuations
Historically, all three of the Companys casino properties have experienced some degree of seasonality. Consequently, the results of HCCs operations for the first and fourth quarters have traditionally been less profitable
than the other quarters of the fiscal year. In addition, the operations of HCCs casinos may fluctuate significantly due to a number of factors, including chance. Such seasonality and fluctuations may materially affect HCCs casino
revenues and overall profitability.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Operating Activities
During
the first nine months of 2002, HCC generated cash flow from operations of $49.7 million. During this period, the operations of the Aurora Casino continued to be HCCs primary source of liquidity and capital resources, contributing approximately
$36.9 million of cash flow from operations. The Tunica Casino provided $7 million of cash from operations. The Shreveport Casino experienced negative cash flow from operations, exclusive of intercompany obligations to consolidated affiliates, during
the first nine months of 2002 amounting to $7.1 million. Additional funds were provided from net collections on affiliate receivables totaling $12.1 million. HCCs only other source of funds consists of interest income earned on temporary
investments ($670,000). In addition to operating expenses at its three casino facilities, other uses of operating cash by HCC during the first nine months of 2002 included corporate overhead costs ($11.2 million) and costs to pursue development
opportunities ($69,000).
Financing Activities
Senior Secured Notes -
During
May 1999, HCC completed the refinancing of its outstanding 12.75% Senior Secured Notes through a debt offering of $310 million of 11.25% Senior Secured Notes due May 1, 2007 and $50 million of floating rate Senior Secured Notes due May 1, 2006
(collectively, the Senior Secured Notes). Interest on the floating rate notes is equal to the six-month LIBOR rate plus 6.28% and is reset semiannually. Effective May 1, 2002, the interest rate decreased to 8.38% from 8.45%. Effective
November 1, 2002, the interest rate was further adjusted to 7.9%. In addition to refinancing existing debt, the Company used proceeds from the debt offering to fund a portion of the Companys equity investment in the Shreveport Casino and,
during October 1999, to acquire the management and consulting contracts on the Aurora Casino and Tunica Casino. The Company also used proceeds from the debt offering to finance a portion of the construction costs of its new, dockside gaming facility
at the Aurora Casino (see Liquidity and Capital Resources - Capital Expenditures and Other Investing Activities). Interest on the Senior Secured Notes is payable semiannually each May 1 and November 1. The Senior Secured Notes are
unconditionally guaranteed on a senior secured basis by HCT and Shreveport Management and may be guaranteed by certain future subsidiaries of HCC. Neither HCA nor
61
HOLLYWOOD CASINO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
HCL are guarantors. The Senior Secured Notes and related guarantees are secured by,
among other things, (1) substantially all of the assets of HCT and future guarantors, (2) a lien not to exceed approximately $108 million on substantially all of the assets of HCA, (3) a pledge of the capital stock of certain subsidiaries of HCC,
including HCA and HCT, and (4) the collateral assignment of the management contract for the Shreveport Casino. The amount of the lien described in (2) above was $108 million at September 30, 2002.
The fixed rate Senior Secured Notes are redeemable at the option of HCC any time on or after May 1, 2003 at 107% of the then outstanding
principal amount, decreasing to 104.666%, 102.333% and 100%, respectively, on May 1, 2004, 2005 and 2006.
The
floating rate Senior Secured Notes may be redeemed at the option of HCC at any time at an initial redemption price of 105% plus accrued interest with the redemption premium decreasing by 1% on May 1 of each year beginning May 1, 2000.
The indenture for the Senior Secured Notes contains various provisions limiting the ability of HCC and certain defined
subsidiaries to, among other things, pay dividends or make other restricted payments; incur additional indebtedness or issue preferred stock, create liens, create dividend or other payment restrictions affecting certain defined subsidiaries; enter
into mergers or consolidations or make sales of all or substantially all assets of HCC, HCT, Shreveport Management or any future guarantor; or enter into certain transactions with affiliates.
Shreveport Debt Obligations -
On August 10, 1999 the Shreveport Partnership issued $150 million of 13% First Mortgage Notes, with contingent interest, due 2006 (the Shreveport First Mortgage Notes), which are guaranteed by HCL, but are non-recourse to
HCC. Fixed interest on the Shreveport First Mortgage Notes is payable semiannually on each February 1 and August 1. In addition, contingent interest accrues and is payable on each interest payment date after the commencement of the Shreveport
Casinos operations. The amount of the contingent interest is equal to 5% of the Shreveport Casinos cash flow, as defined, for the applicable period subject to maximum of $5 million for any four consecutive fiscal quarters. Contingent
interest with respect to the Shreveport First Mortgage Notes amounted to $694,000 during the first nine months of 2002, payment of which has been deferred. Payment of contingent interest may be deferred to the extent that payment would result in
certain financial coverage ratios not being met. Accrued contingent interest with respect to the Shreveport First Mortgage Notes amounted to $1.1 million at September 30, 2002. The notes are collateralized by a first priority security interest in
substantially all of the Shreveport Partnerships existing and future assets other than assets secured by the Shreveport Senior Secured Notes (see below) and up to $6 million in assets that may be acquired with future equipment financing as
well as by a pledge of the common stock of the HCC subsidiaries which hold the partnership interests.
In June
2001, the Shreveport Partnership issued $39 million of 13% Senior Secured Notes, with contingent interest, due August 2006 (the Shreveport Senior Secured Notes). The Shreveport Senior Secured Notes were issued with a premium to yield
interest at an effective annual rate of 12.21% per annum. Fixed interest on the Shreveport Senior Secured Notes at an annual rate of 13% is payable on each February 1 and August 1. In addition, contingent interest accrues and is payable on each
interest payment date. The amount of contingent interest is equal to 1.3% of the consolidated cash flow of the Shreveport Partnership for the applicable period subject to a maximum contingent interest of $1.3 million for any four consecutive fiscal
quarters. Contingent interest amounted to $183,000 during the first nine months of 2002, payment of which has been deferred. Total accrued contingent interest with respect to
62
HOLLYWOOD CASINO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
the Shreveport Senior Secured Notes amounted to $261,000 at September 30, 2002. Payment
of contingent interest may be deferred to the extent that payment would result in certain financial coverage ratios not being met. Proceeds from the Shreveport Senior Secured Notes were used, in part, to retire the Shreveport Partnerships
capital lease obligations with the remainder available for working capital purposes.
Under the terms of certain
intercreditor collateral agreements, the Shreveport Senior Secured Notes are secured by, among other things, (1) a security interest in certain furniture, fixtures and equipment acquired prior to the opening of the Shreveport Casino for $30 million
and (2) a security interest on an equal basis in up to $10 million of the collateral which secures the Shreveport First Mortgage Notes.
The Shreveport First Mortgage Notes and Shreveport Senior Secured Notes are redeemable at the option of the Shreveport Partnership at any time on or after August 1, 2003 at 106.5% of the then outstanding principal amount,
decreasing to 103.25% on August 1, 2004 and 100% on or after August 1, 2005.
The indenture for the Shreveport
First Mortgage Notes and Shreveport Senior Secured Notes contains various provisions limiting the ability the Shreveport Partnership to borrow money, pay dividends, make investments, pledge or sell its assets or enter into mergers or consolidations.
The indenture to the Shreveport First Mortgage Notes also limits the ability of certain HCC subsidiaries which guarantee the debt to acquire additional assets, become liable for additional obligations or engage in any business activities other than
holding the partnership interests or acting as managing general partner of the Shreveport Partnership.
Ground
Leases -
HCT entered into a ground lease covering 70 acres of land on which the Tunica Casino was
constructed. The ground lease was for an initial term of five years from the opening date of the facility and, at HCTs option, may be renewed for nine additional five-year periods. The lease is currently in its first five-year renewal term.
Obligations under the ground lease include both minimum monthly fixed payments and percentage rent, which in the aggregate will be the greater of 4% of Gross Revenues, as defined, or $1.1 million per year. HCT is responsible for all operating and
other expenses of the property in accordance with the lease terms. HCT expensed $3.3 million during the nine month period ended September 30, 2002 in connection with the ground lease.
The Shreveport Partnership entered into a ground lease with the city of Shreveport for the land on which the Shreveport Casino was built. The lease has an initial term
ending December 20, 2010 with subsequent renewals available to the Shreveport Partnership for up to an additional 40 years. Base rental payments under the lease began when construction commenced and were $10,000 per month during the construction
period. The base rental amount increased to $450,000 per year upon opening and continuing at that amount for the remainder of the initial ten-year lease term. During the first five-year rental term, the base annual rental will be $402,500. The
annual base rental payment will be $462,875 for the second five-year renewal term, $532,306 for the third five-year renewal term, $612,512 for the fourth five-year renewal term and $703,957 for the fifth five-year renewal term with no further
increases. This base rental portion of the ground lease is being amortized by the Shreveport Casino on a straight-line basis. In addition to the base rent, the Shreveport Partnership pays monthly percentage rent equal to the greater of (1) $500,000
per year or (2) the sum of 1% of adjusted gross revenues of the Shreveport Casino and the amount by which 50% of the net income from the parking facilities exceeds a specified parking income credit. Ground lease rentals amounted to approximately
$1.5 million during the nine month period ended September 30, 2002, including percentage rentals amounting to $1.1 million. In
63
HOLLYWOOD CASINO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
addition, the ground lease agreement calls for payments in lieu of admission fees to
the City of Shreveport and payments to the local school board amounting to 3.225% and .5375% of Net Gaming Proceeds (as defined in the agreement), respectively. These additional charges amounted to $4.3 million during the first nine months of 2002.
Other -
In June 2001 HCT entered into a bank credit facility in the amount of $3 million available through June 30, 2002. Borrowings under the line of credit are payable over a 36 month period and accrue
interest at the banks prime lending rate plus .75% per annum, on either a fixed or floating rate basis. During June 2001, HCT borrowed $731,000 under the credit facility at an interest rate of 7.5% per annum. HCT made additional borrowings of
$130,000 at the rate of 7.5% per annum in July 2001 and $220,000 at the rate of 7.5% per annum in August 2001.
HCC Consolidated Commitments -
As of September 30, 2002, HCCs remaining maturities
of long-term debt are $65,000 during 2002, $380,000 in 2003 and $244,000 in 2004. During 2006, the floating rate Senior Secured Notes, Shreveport First Mortgage Notes and Shreveport Senior Secured Notes become due aggregating $239 million. In 2007,
the $310 million 11.25% Senior Secured Notes become due. Remaining minimum lease payments under capital lease obligations are $1.1 million for the remainder of 2002 and approximately $2.6 annually between 2003 and 2006 and total $24.5 million in the
aggregate.
Commitments under noncancellable operating leases, exclusive of the ground leases in Shreveport and
Tunica previously discussed, amount to $343,000 during the remainder of 2002. In future years, such commitments decline steadily from $1.2 million in 2003 to $380,000 in 2006 and amount to approximately $5.4 million in the aggregate.
Capital Expenditures and Other Investing Activities
Aurora Casino -
Capital expenditures at the Aurora Casino
during the nine month period ended September 30, 2002 (exclusive of expansion costs - see below) were $2 million; management anticipates spending approximately $1.8 million during the remainder of 2002 toward its ongoing capital improvements
program. Significant projects still planned for 2002 consist primarily of slot machines, gaming equipment and other departmental expenditures.
Prior to February 15, 2002, the Aurora Casino conducted its gaming operations on two, four-level riverboats having a combined casino space of approximately 32,000 square feet. In March 2001, the Aurora
Casino began construction of a major expansion, highlighted by the construction of a new dockside facility to replace the Aurora Casinos two riverboats. The first half of the dockside facility and a new casino entrance were completed and
opened on February 15, 2002. A new, state-of-the-art buffet with the latest in presentation cooking and 27% additional seating capacity opened in May 2002. The second half of the dockside casino opened June 14, 2002 and a new parking facility opened
in late June 2002. Management believes the new dockside facility, which has approximately 53,000 square feet of gaming space on a single level, significantly increases passenger capacity and provides a premier gaming and entertainment facility for
the Aurora Casinos patrons. The total project cost approximately $76.5 million. HCCs debt offering completed in May 1999 provided $40 million of the project costs for the Aurora Casino expansion with the remainder coming from cash on
hand and cash available from
64
HOLLYWOOD CASINO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
operations. Costs incurred during the nine month period ended September 30, 2002 and to
date with respect to the expansion project have totaled approximately $29.9 million and $76.5 million, respectively.
The commencement of construction of the new dockside facility had previously been delayed as a result of a complaint filed in late 1999 in an Illinois state court concerning the constitutionality of a portion of the legislation that
enabled dockside gaming in Illinois. Although the constitutional challenge centers on the relocation of one of the existing gaming licenses, a finding that such portion of the legislation is unconstitutional could result in a finding that all or a
portion of the legislation, including dockside gaming, is invalid. In January 2001, the Circuit Court judge dismissed the complaint ruling that the plaintiffs lacked standing to challenge the statute and failed to exhaust their administrative
remedies. The plaintiffs filed an appeal of that ruling. On June 28, 2002, the Illinois Appellate Court, Third Division, affirmed the trial courts dismissal of the complaint finding that the plaintiffs lacked standing to challenge the statute.
The plaintiffs filed an appeal of the ruling to the Illinois Supreme Court. If the Illinois Supreme Court overturns that ruling, and the state court rules that all or a portion of the legislation is invalid, management believes that it may be able
to continue to operate its existing dockside facility pending a final resolution of the litigation. In addition, on May 17, 2002, the Circuit Court of Cook County granted leave for the filing of a complaint on behalf of an Illinois
taxpayer challenging the constitutionality of a portion of the legislation that enabled dockside gaming in Illinois. On August 30, 2002, the Circuit Court dismissed such taxpayer lawsuit and the plaintiff has filed an appeal of the dismissal.
In the unlikely event that the provisions in question are found to be unconstitutional after all appeals, and the entire legislation is invalidated so that dockside gaming is not permitted, the Company will be able to return to using its two
riverboats to conduct gaming.
The dockside casino was constructed in two halves which have now been connected to
form a single dockside casino. This strategy was developed in order to minimize disruption of the Aurora Casinos operations during the construction period and allow for at least a partial opening at a much earlier date. The Aurora Casino
prospectively adjusted the remaining useful lives of its riverboats and other fixed assets being replaced to reduce the recorded net book value of such assets to their estimated net realizable value at the time they were removed from service.
Consequently, depreciation expense during the nine month period ended September 30, 2002 increased by $9.8 million.
Tunica Casino -
Capital expenditures (exclusive of hotel renovation costssee below)
at the Tunica Casino during the first nine months of 2002 amounted to $2.9 million; management anticipates spending $1.7 million during the remainder of 2002 for its on-going capital improvements program. Expenditures planned consist primarily of
updating slot machines and other departmental expenditures. During the second quarter of 2002, the Company began a substantial capital expenditure project at the Tunica property that includes the conversion of 22 hotel rooms into 11 new suites and
the renovation of all other hotel rooms. Expenditures through September 30, 2002 amounted to $3.4 million. As currently planned, the renovation will cost an estimated $8 million and is expected to be completed in late 2003.
HCT entered into an agreement with two other casino operators during 1996 providing for the joint construction and ownership of a golf
course. Contributions by HCT to the limited liability corporation formed to develop and operate the golf course, which opened in November 1998, have totaled approximately $2.3 million.
65
HOLLYWOOD CASINO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Shreveport Casino -
Capital expenditures at the Shreveport Casino during the first nine months of 2002 amounted to $1.2 million; management anticipates
spending approximately $1 million during the remainder of 2002 toward the Shreveport Casinos program of ongoing capital improvements.
On April 23, 2000, the construction site for the Shreveport Casino suffered tornado damage which contributed to the delay in opening the facility. Management filed damage claims and received
reimbursements from its insurance carrier during 2000 in the amount of approximately $1.5 million to cover substantially all of the cost of repairing the damage incurred. Management is also seeking to recover lost profits and related claims under
its business interruption insurance coverage. To the extent the delay in the facilitys opening was the responsibility of contractors, management is also seeking to recover damages from those entities. These matters are the subject of a lawsuit
pending in U.S. District Court in Louisiana. For this and other reasons, the Shreveport Partnership has withheld payment of certain retainage amounts which the general contractor is currently seeking. The general contractor has also submitted
additional change orders which the Shreveport Partnership is disputing. The accompanying consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 2002 includes a liability in the amount of approximately $3.6 million in accounts payable in connection with the
construction project. Both the recovery of any amounts by the Shreveport Partnership from either its insurance companies or the contractors and the need to pay the general contractor any additional amounts are currently subject to litigation and
management is unable to determine the amounts, if any, that will ultimately be received or paid.
Conclusion
HCC is currently restricted by the terms of its existing loan agreements from making any additional capital
contributions to the Shreveport Partnership. To the extent HCC desired to make additional contributions to the Shreveport Partnership, HCC would currently be required to obtain a waiver from a majority of the holders of its $360 million in
outstanding Senior Secured Notes. However, a subsidiary of HCC is not restricted by the terms of HCCs loan agreements. This subsidiary had approximately $34 million in cash on September 30, 2002, which funds are available for any corporate
purpose, including making additional capital contributions to the Shreveport Partnership.
In connection with the
announced merger of HCC into Penn National, as more fully described in Part II, Item 5, future contributions to the Shreveport Partnership, including those contemplated in the preceding paragraph, are subject to the prior consent of Penn National.
Such approval has been obtained to contribute, if needed, any funds necessary to make the February 1, 2003 interest payments with respect to the Shreveport First Mortgage Notes and Shreveport Senior Secured Notes.
Management anticipates that HCCs funding requirements for its operating activities will continue to be satisfied by existing cash
and cash generated by the Aurora Casino and the Tunica Casino. Management believes that the Shreveport Casinos existing cash together with cash from its operations and additional capital contributions from HCCs unrestricted subsidiary
(subject to Penn Nationals consent to the extent required), will be sufficient to meet its liquidity and capital resource needs for the next 24 months. Under the indenture to the Senior Secured Notes, the Shreveport Partnership will also be
able to borrow, if needed, up to an additional $6 million to finance the purchase of furniture, fixtures and equipment.
66
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
The Company has $50 million of floating rate Senior Secured Notes outstanding (see Liquidity and
Capital Resources - Financing Activities below). Interest on the floating rate notes is at the LIBOR rate plus 6.28% and is reset semiannually. Accordingly, an increase in the LIBOR rate of 1% would increase interest expense by $500,000 per
year.
The floating rate loan was entered into for non-trading purposes as sources of funding for the Company and
management believes that this financing has no other material market risks other than interest rate risk. Such interest rate risk is beyond managements control; however, the obligation could be prepaid should increases in the underlying
interest rate result in an excessive financing cost; however, prepayment of the floating rate notes would require a premium in the amount of 2% as of May 1, 2002, decreasing by 1% each subsequent May 1.
Both the Shreveport First Mortgage Notes issued to finance construction of the Shreveport Casino and the Shreveport Senior Secured Notes
issued to retire lease financing and provide working capital include interest at the rate of 13% payable semiannually as well as contingent interest. Contingent interest under the indentures to the Shreveport First Mortgage Notes and the Shreveport
Senior Secured Notes is equal to 5% and 1.3%, respectively, of consolidated cash flow for the applicable period subject to a maximum contingent interest of $5 million and $1.3 million, respectively, for any four consecutive fiscal quarters.
Accordingly, the maximum potential interest with respect to the Shreveport First Mortgage Notes for a fiscal year could be $24.5 million, resulting in an effective annual interest rate of 16.33% and the maximum potential interest with respect to the
Shreveport Senior Secured Notes for a fiscal year could be $6.4 million, resulting in an effective annual interest rate of 15.5%. These maximums would assume that the annual consolidated cash flow of the Shreveport Casino was at least $100 million.
The contingent component of interest under the Shreveport First Mortgage Notes and the Shreveport Senior Secured Notes was negotiated with the lenders as part of determining the fixed rate component of interest. Management believes that because the
contingent interest component is determined by cash flows and can only be paid if certain coverage ratios are met, liquidity and capital resources of the Shreveport Partnership will not be compromised by the payment, if any, of contingent interest.
Changes in the market interest rate would also impact the fair market value of the Companys outstanding
fixed rate debt instruments. Management estimates that an increase of 1% in the market interest rate would result in a decrease in the fair market value of HCCs debt securities of approximately $19.6 million.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date), HCC (the Company) carried out an evaluation, under the supervision of the Companys
management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures as defined in the Securities and Exchange Act of
1934 Rules 13a-14(c) and 15d-14(c). Based on that evaluation, the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that as of the Evaluation Date, the Companys disclosure controls and procedures are effective
in timely alerting them to material information relating to the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries required to be included in their periodic filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. There have not been any significant changes in
the Companys internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect those controls subsequent to the Evaluation Date.
67
PART II: OTHER INFORMATION
Item 5. Other Information
On August
7, 2002, the Company, Penn National and P Acquisition Corp., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Penn National, entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the Merger Agreement), pursuant to which, and subject to the terms and conditions
thereof, Penn National will acquire all the capital stock of the Company through a merger of P Acquisition Corp. with and into the Company.
The consideration to be paid by Penn National is $12.75 for each issued and outstanding share of the Companys Class A common stock and all Company stock options will be cashed out at an amount
equal to the difference between $12.75 and their exercise price. On the closing date of the merger, Penn National will also redeem the Companys outstanding floating rate Senior Secured Notes due 2006 and redeem through a tender offer, or
otherwise defease or discharge, the Companys 11.25% Senior Secured Notes due 2007.
Under the terms of the
Merger Agreement, the Company will be prohibited from soliciting competing acquisition offers. Nothing, however, shall prevent the Company (or its Board of Directors) from considering third party proposals and entering into a superior proposal at
any time prior to obtaining the approval of the Companys stockholders or after February 28, 2003, so long as the Company did not solicit such proposal. The obligations of the Company and Penn National to consummate the transaction will be
subject to standard closing conditions, including, without limitation, obtaining (1) the approval of the Companys stockholders and (2) required regulatory and gaming authority approvals. The obligation of Penn National to consummate the
transaction will also be subject to (1) consummation of Penn Nationals third-party financing, (2) there being no material adverse change in the Company and (3) holders of not more than 10% of the Companys outstanding shares having
exercised statutory appraisal rights.
Either party may terminate the transaction (1) by mutual consent, (2) for
material breach of the Merger Agreement by the other party, (3) if the Companys stockholders do not approve the merger, (4) if the required regulatory approvals can not be obtained, (5) if the merger is not consummated within 270 days of the
signing of the Merger Agreement (which deadline may be extended to 365 days under certain circumstances) or (6) if the Company approves and enters into a superior proposal. The Company may also terminate the transaction if Penn Nationals
third-party financing commitment is terminated or significantly delayed or impaired. Penn National may also terminate the transaction if there is a material adverse change in the Company. If the transaction is terminated in connection with a
superior proposal, Penn National will be entitled to receive a break-up fee of $15,000,000 plus additional amounts in relation to the increase in the merger consideration (provided that such fee shall reach a maximum of $27,500,000 for a
superior proposal of $20.15 per share or greater).
In connection with the Merger Agreement, the Company, Penn
National and certain stockholders of the Company representing at least 50.3% of the Companys voting power, have entered into Stockholder Agreements (the Stockholder Agreements) which generally provide, among other things, that such
stockholders will (1) vote for the merger, (2) agree to maintain the current composition of the board, (3) stay all pending litigation and (4) fully release at closing all applicable parties from any past and current claims. Consequently, subject to
the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement and Stockholder Agreements, holders of a majority of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of the Company eligible to vote have agreed to vote in favor of the merger, assuring stockholder
approval. The Stockholder Agreements will terminate upon any termination of the Merger Agreement.
Copies of the
Merger Agreement and the Stockholder Agreements were previously included with the Companys Report on Form 8-K filed on August 8, 2002 as Exhibits 2.1 and 10.1 through 10.13. Such exhibits are incorporated by reference into this Item 5 and the
foregoing description is qualified in its entirety by reference to such exhibits.
68
Hollywood Casino Corporation will hold a Special Meeting of Stockholders on
Wednesday, December 18, 2002 to vote on the proposed merger of P Acquisition Corp. with and into HCC as described in the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated August 7, 2002 among HCC, P Acquisition Corp. and Penn National.
Item 6(a). Exhibits
@ |
|
10.1 |
|
Joint Motion for Entry of Decree in Notice of Violation and Hearing (incident #RGS 000375), dated October 29, 2002. (Exhibit
10.1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# |
|
99.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# |
|
99.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
@ |
|
Incorporated by reference to the exhibit shown in parenthesis included in the Report on Form 8-K filed by HCC on October 29, 2002.
|
Item 6(b). Reports on Form 8-K
On August 8, 2002, the Registrants filed a report on Form 8-K to report that Hollywood Casino Corporation had entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger to be acquired by Penn National Gaming, Inc.
On October 29, 2002, the Registrants filed a report on Form 8-K to report that Hollywood Casino Shreveport had
entered into an agreement with the Louisiana State Police, Casino Gaming Division, with respect to a hearing which had been previously set regarding certain testimony of a third party which may be in conflict with testimony provided by Jack E.
Pratt, a current director of HCC.
69
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, each of the Registrants has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned
thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
HOLLYWOOD CASINO CORPORATION |
|
Date: |
|
November 12, 2002
|
|
|
|
By: |
|
/s/ Paul C. Yates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paul C. Yates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasurer, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
|
HWCC-TUNICA, INC. |
|
Date: |
|
November 12, 2002
|
|
|
|
By: |
|
/s/ Paul C. Yates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paul C. Yates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
70
Annual and Quarterly Certifications
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
I, Edward T. Pratt III,
certify that
1. |
|
I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Hollywood Casino Corporation and Subsidiaries and of HWCC-Tunica, Inc. and Subsidiary (collectively, the
Registrants) for the period ended September 30, 2002; |
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; |
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrants as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; |
4. |
|
The Registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Registrants and we have: |
|
a) |
|
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Registrants, including their consolidated subsidiaries, is
made know to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; |
|
b) |
|
evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly
report (the Evaluation Date); and |
|
c) |
|
presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date; |
5. |
|
The Registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Registrants auditors and the audit
committee of the Registrants boards of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): |
|
a) |
|
all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the Registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and |
|
b) |
|
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal controls; and
|
6. |
|
The Registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 12, 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Edward T. Pratt III
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edward T. Pratt III Chief Executive Officer
|
71
Annual and Quarterly Certifications
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
I, Paul C. Yates,
certify that
1. |
|
I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Hollywood Casino Corporation and Subsidiaries and of HWCC-Tunica, Inc. and Subsidiary (collectively, the
Registrants) for the period ended September 30, 2002; |
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; |
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrants as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; |
4. |
|
The Registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Registrants and we have: |
|
a) |
|
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Registrants, including their consolidated subsidiaries, is
made know to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; |
|
b) |
|
evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly
report (the Evaluation Date); and |
|
c) |
|
presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date; |
5. |
|
The Registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Registrants auditors and the audit
committee of the Registrants boards of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): |
|
a) |
|
all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the Registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and |
|
b) |
|
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal controls; and
|
6. |
|
The Registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 12, 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Paul C. Yates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paul C. Yates Chief Financial Officer |
72