k93010.htm
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-K
|
[X] ANNUAL
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
For the
Fiscal Year Ended September
30, 2010
or
|
[ ] TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
Commission
File Number: 001-33795
HOME FEDERAL BANCORP,
INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Maryland |
68-0666697 |
(State or other
jurisdiction of incorporation |
(I.R.S.
Employer |
or
organization) |
Identification
No.) |
|
|
500 12th Avenue
South, Nampa, Idaho |
83651
|
(Address of
principal executive offices) |
(Zip
Code) |
|
|
Registrant’s
telephone number, including area
code:
|
(208)
466-4634 |
|
|
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: |
|
|
|
Common Stock, par value $.01 per
share |
Nasdaq
Global Select Market
|
(Title of
Each Class) |
(Name of Each
Exchange on Which Registered) |
|
|
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: |
None
|
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in
Rule 405 of the Securities Act.Yes [ ] No [X]
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to
Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes[ ] No [X]
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this
chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit and post such files).Yes [ ] No
[ ]
Indicate
by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. [ X ]
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See
definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller
reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated
filer [ ] |
Accelerated filer
[X] |
Non-accelerated
filer [ ] |
Smaller reporting
company [ ] |
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Act). Yes [ ] No [X]
As of
December 6, 2010, there were 16,687,165 shares of the registrant’s common stock
outstanding. The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by
nonaffiliates of the registrant based on the closing sales price of the
registrant's common stock as quoted on The Nasdaq Global Select Market on March
31, 2010, was approximately $234,556,000(16,165,101
shares at $14.51 per share).
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Part II
and Part III - Portions of the Registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement for its
2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
HOME
FEDERAL BANCORP, INC.
2010
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
|
Page |
PART
I.
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1
- |
Business |
2
|
|
|
|
Item 1A
- |
Risk
Factors |
43 |
|
|
|
Item 1B
- |
Unresolved Staff
Comments |
54 |
|
|
|
Item 2
- |
Properties |
54 |
|
|
|
Item 3
- |
Legal
Proceedings |
57 |
|
|
|
Item 4
- |
Removed and
reserved |
57 |
|
|
|
PART
II.
|
|
|
|
|
Item 5
- |
Market
for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters
and
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
57 |
|
|
|
Item 6
- |
Selected Financial
Data |
60 |
|
|
|
Item 7
- |
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations |
62 |
|
|
|
Item 7A
- |
Quantitative and
Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
90 |
|
|
|
Item 8
- |
Financial Statements
and Supplementary Data |
91 |
|
|
|
Item 9
- |
Changes in and
Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial
Disclosure |
135 |
|
|
|
Item
9A- |
Controls and
Procedures |
135 |
|
|
|
Item 9B
- |
Other
Information |
135 |
|
|
|
PART III. |
|
|
|
|
Item 10
- |
Directors, Executive
Officers and Corporate Governance |
136 |
|
|
|
Item 11
- |
Executive
Compensation |
136 |
|
|
|
Item 12
- |
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and
Related
Stockholder Matters
|
137 |
|
|
|
Item 13
- |
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director
Independence |
137 |
|
|
|
Item 14
- |
Principal Accounting
Fees and Services |
137 |
|
|
|
PART
IV.
|
|
|
|
|
Item 15
– |
Exhibits, Financial
Statement Schedules |
137
|
Forward-Looking
Statements and “Safe Harbor” statement under the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995
This
annual report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements, which can be
identified by the use of words such as “believes,” “intends,” “expects,”
“anticipates,” “estimates” or similar expressions. Forward-looking
statements include, but are not limited to:
·
|
statements
of our goals, intentions and
expectations;
|
·
|
statements
regarding our business plans, prospects, growth and operating
strategies;
|
·
|
statements
regarding the quality of our loan and investment portfolios;
and
|
·
|
estimates
of our risks and future costs and
benefits.
|
These
forward-looking statements are subject to significant risks and uncertainties.
Actual results may differ materially from those contemplated by the
forward-looking statements due to, among others, the following
factors:
·
|
the
credit risks of lending activities, including changes in the level and
trend of loan delinquencies and write-offs and changes in our allowance
for loan losses and provision for loan losses that may be impacted by
deterioration in the housing and commercial real estate
markets;
|
·
|
changes
in general economic conditions, either nationally or in our market
areas;
|
·
|
changes
in the levels of general interest rates, and the relative differences
between short and long term interest rates, deposit interest rates, our
net interest margin and funding
sources;
|
·
|
risks
related to acquiring assets in or entering markets in which we have not
previously operated and may not be
familiar;
|
·
|
fluctuations
in the demand for loans, the number of unsold homes, land and other
properties and fluctuations in real estate values in our market
areas;
|
·
|
secondary
market conditions for loans and our ability to sell loans in the secondary
market;
|
·
|
results
of examinations of us by the Office of Thrift Supervision (the “OTS”) or
other regulatory authorities, including the possibility that any such
regulatory authority may, among other things, require us to increase our
reserve for loan losses, write-down assets, change our regulatory capital
position or affect our ability to borrow funds or maintain or increase
deposits, which could adversely affect our liquidity and
earnings;
|
·
|
legislative
or regulatory changes that adversely affect our
business including changes in regulatory policies and
principles and the recently enacted Dodd-Frank Act and regulations that
have been or will be promulgated thereunder; and interpretation
of regulatory capital or other
rules;
|
·
|
our
ability to attract and retain
deposits;
|
·
|
further
increases in premiums for deposit
insurance;
|
·
|
our
ability to realize the residual values of our
leases;
|
·
|
our
ability to control operating costs and
expenses;
|
·
|
the
use of estimates in determining fair value of certain of our assets, which
estimates may prove to be incorrect and result in significant declines in
valuation;
|
·
|
difficulties
in reducing risks associated with the loans on our balance
sheet;
|
·
|
staffing
fluctuations in response to product demand or the implementation of
corporate strategies that affect our workforce and potential associated
charges;
|
·
|
computer
systems on which we depend could fail or experience a security
breach;
|
·
|
our
ability to retain key members of our senior management
team;
|
·
|
costs
and effects of litigation, including settlements and
judgments;
|
·
|
our
ability to successfully integrate any assets, liabilities, customers,
systems, and management personnel we have acquired, including the
Community First Bank and LibertyBank transactions described in this
report, or may in the future acquire from our merger and acquisition
activities into our operations, our ability to retain customers and
employees and our ability to realize related revenue synergies and cost
savings within expected time frames, or at all, and any goodwill charges
related thereto thereto and
costs or difficulties relating to integration matters, including but not
limited to customer and employee retention, which might be greater than
expected;
|
·
|
the
possibility that the expected benefits from the FDIC-assisted acquisitions
will not be realized;
|
·
|
increased
competitive pressures among financial services
companies;
|
·
|
changes
in consumer spending, borrowing and savings
habits;
|
·
|
the
availability of resources to address changes in laws, rules, or
regulations or to respond to regulatory
actions;
|
·
|
our
ability to pay dividends on our common
stock;
|
·
|
adverse
changes in the securities markets;
|
·
|
inability
of key third-party providers to perform their obligations to
us;
|
·
|
changes
in accounting policies and practices, as may be adopted by the financial
institution regulatory agencies or the Financial Accounting Standards
Board, including additional guidance and interpretation on accounting
issues and details of the implementation of new accounting methods;
and
|
·
|
other
economic, competitive, governmental, regulatory, and technological factors
affecting our operations, pricing, products and services and the other
risks described as detailed from time to time in our filings with the SEC,
including this 2010 Form 10-K and subsequently filed Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q. Such developments could have an adverse impact on
|
Some of
these and other factors are discussed in this Annual Report on Form 10-K under
the caption “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this document and in the documents
incorporated by reference herein. Such developments could have an adverse impact
on our financial position and our results of operations.
Any of
the forward-looking statements that we make in this annual report and in other
public statements we make may turn out to be wrong because of inaccurate
assumptions we might make, because of the factors illustrated above or because
of other factors that we cannot foresee. Because of these and other
uncertainties, our actual future results may be materially different from the
results indicated by these forward-looking statements and you should not rely on
such statements. We undertake no obligation to publish revised forward-looking
statements to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events or circumstances
after the date hereof. These risks
could cause our actual results for fiscal year 2011 and beyond to differ
materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements by or on
behalf of us, and could negatively affect our financial condition, liquidity and
operating and stock price performance.
As used
throughout this report, the terms “we”, “our”, “us”, or the “Company” refer to
Home Federal Bancorp and its consolidated subsidiaries, unless the context
otherwise requires.
PART
I
Item 1.
Business
Organization
The
Company, a Maryland corporation, was organized by Home Federal MHC (“MHC”), Home
Federal Bancorp, Inc. (a federally chartered stock corporation) and Home Federal
Bank to facilitate the “second-step” conversion of Home Federal Bank (“Bank”)
from the mutual holding company structure to the stock holding company structure
(“Conversion”). Upon consummation of the Conversion, which occurred on December
19, 2007, the Company became the holding company for Home Federal Bank and now
owns all of the issued and outstanding shares of Home Federal Bank’s common
stock. As part of the Conversion, shares of the Company’s common stock were
issued and sold in an offering to certain depositors of Home Federal Bank and
others. Concurrent with the offering, each share of Home Federal Bancorp, Inc.’s
common stock owned by public shareholders was exchanged for 1.136 shares of the
Company’s common stock, which resulted in a 853,133 increase in outstanding
shares, with cash being paid in lieu of issuing any fractional
shares.
As part
of the Conversion, a total of 9,384,000 new shares of the Company were sold in
the offering at $10 per share. Proceeds from the offering totaled $87.8 million,
net of offering costs of approximately $5.9 million. The Company contributed
$48.0 million or approximately 50% of the net proceeds to the Bank in the form
of a capital contribution. The Company loaned $8.2 million to the Bank’s
Employee Stock Ownership Plan (the “ESOP”) and the ESOP used those funds to
acquire 816,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $10 per
share.
The
Conversion was accounted for as reorganization in corporate form with no change
in the historical basis of the Company’s assets, liabilities or stockholders’
equity. All references to the number of shares outstanding, including
references
for purposes of calculating per share amounts, are restated to give retroactive
recognition to the exchange ratio applied in the Conversion.
Acquisition
of assets and liabilities of Community First Bank
On August
7, 2009, the Bank entered into a purchase and assumption agreement with loss
sharing agreements with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) to
assume all of the deposits (excluding brokered deposits) and certain assets of
Community First Bank, a full service commercial bank, headquartered in
Prineville, Oregon (the “CFB Acquisition”). Community First Bank operated eight
locations in central Oregon. Home Federal Bank assumed approximately
$142.8 million of the deposits of Community First Bank. Additionally,
Home Federal Bank purchased approximately $142.3 million in loans and $12.9
million of real estate and other repossessed assets (“REO”). The
loans and REO purchased are covered by loss sharing agreements between the FDIC
and Home Federal Bank which affords the Bank significant
protection. Under the loss sharing agreements, Home Federal Bank will
share in the losses on assets covered under the agreement (referred to as
covered assets). The FDIC has agreed to reimburse Home Federal Bank
for 80% of losses up to $34.0 million, and 95% of losses that exceed that
amount. In addition, Home Federal Bank also purchased cash and cash
equivalents and investment securities of Community First Bank valued at $37.7
million at the date of the Acquisition, and assumed $18.3 million in Federal
Home Loan Bank advances and other borrowings. This acquisition was accounted for
as a purchase under Financial Accounting Standard (“FAS”) No. 141, “Business
Combinations,” with the assets acquired and liabilities assumed recorded at
their respective fair values.
Acquisition
of assets and liabilities of LibertyBank
On July
30, 2010, the Bank entered into a purchase and assumption agreement with loss
sharing agreements with the FDIC to assume all of the deposits and certain
assets of LibertyBank, a full service commercial bank headquartered in Eugene,
Oregon (the “LibertyBank Acquisition”). LibertyBank operated fifteen locations
in central and western Oregon. The LibertyBank Acquisition consisted
of assets with a preliminary fair value estimate of approximately $690.6
million, including $373.1 million of cash and cash equivalents, $197.6 million
of loans and leases and $34.7 million of securities. Liabilities with a
preliminary fair value estimate of $688.6 million were also assumed, including
$682.6 million of deposits.
Included
in the LibertyBank Acquisition were three subsidiaries of LibertyBank, which
have become subsidiaries of Home Federal Bank. Two of the subsidiaries, Liberty
Funding, Inc., and Liberty Investment Services, Inc., are inactive with no
business activities. The third subsidiary, Commercial Equipment Lease
Corporation (“CELC”) finances and leases equipment under equipment finance
agreements and lease contracts, typically for terms of less than 5 years. The
book value of the stock of CELC was $10.3 million. CELC conducts business in all
fifty states, with a primary focus on Oregon, California and Washington state.
Home Federal Bank intends to wind down the operations of CELC and the accounts
of CELC have been consolidated in the accompanying financial
statements.
Home
Federal Bank also entered into loss sharing agreements with the FDIC in the
LibertyBank Acquisition. Under the loss sharing agreements, the FDIC has agreed
to reimburse Home Federal for 80% of losses on purchased REO, nearly all of the
loans and leases of LibertyBank and CELC and certain related expenses. Total
losses on the loans and leases of CELC are limited to the sum of the book value
of the Bank's investment in CELC and the Bank's outstanding balance on a line of
credit balance to CELC as of the acquisition date. These amounts totaled $57.0
million at July 30, 2010, and are eliminated upon consolidation.
In
September 2020, approximately ten years following the LibertyBank Acquisition
date, the Bank is required to make a payment to the FDIC in the event that
losses on covered assets under the loss share agreements have been less than the
intrinsic loss estimate, which was determined by the FDIC prior to the
LibertyBank Acquisition. The payment amount will be 50% of the excess, if any,
of (i) 20% of the Total Intrinsic Loss Estimate of $60.0 million, which equals
$12.0 million, less the sum of the following:
A.
|
20%
of the Net Loss Amount, which is the sum of all loss amounts on covered
assets less the sum of all recovery amounts realized. This amount is not
yet known;
|
B.
|
25%
of the asset premium (discount). This amount is ($7.5) million;
and
|
C.
|
3.5%
of the total covered assets under the loss share agreements. This amount
is $10.1 million.
|
The
Company has estimated the minimum level of losses to avoid a true-up provision
payment to the FDIC to be $46.7 million. The maximum amount of the true-up
provision is $4.7 million, if there are no losses in the covered loan portfolio.
Due to the estimated level of losses at the LibertyBank Acquisition date,
management has determined a true-up provision payment is unlikely. As such, no
liability has been recorded.
Business
Activities
Home
Federal Bancorp’s primary business activity is the ownership of the outstanding
capital stock of Home Federal Bank. Home Federal Bancorp neither owns nor leases
any property but instead uses the premises, equipment and other property of Home
Federal Bank with the payment of appropriate management fees, as required by
applicable law and regulations. At September 30, 2010, Home Federal Bancorp has
no significant assets, other than $36.2 million of cash and cash equivalents,
$17.0 million of mortgage-backed securities and all of the outstanding shares of
Home Federal Bank, and no significant liabilities.
Home
Federal Bank was founded in 1920 as a building and loan association and
reorganized as a federal mutual savings and loan association in 1936. Home
Federal Bank’s deposits are insured by the FDIC up to applicable legal limits
under the Deposit Insurance Fund. The Bank has been a member of the Federal Home
Loan Bank ("FHLB") System since 1937. Home Federal Bank’s primary regulator is
the Office of Thrift Supervision (“OTS”).
We are in
the business of attracting deposits from consumers and businesses in our market
areas and utilizing those deposits to originate loans. We offer a wide range of
loan products to meet the credit needs of our customers. Historically, lending
activities have been primarily directed toward the origination of residential
and commercial real estate loans. Residential real estate lending activities
have been primarily focused on first mortgages on owner occupied, one-to-four
family residential properties. The Bank now originates nearly all of its
one-to-four family residential loans for sale in the secondary
market.
The Board
of Directors and the management team have undertaken efforts to change the
Company’s strategy from that of a traditional thrift to a full-service community
bank. This transition includes a reduced reliance on one-to-four family loans
originated for the Bank’s portfolio. As a result, the Bank’s lending activities
have expanded in recent years to include commercial business lending, including
commercial real estate and builder finance. While continuing our commitment to
residential lending through our secondary market program, management expects
commercial lending to become increasingly important for the Company. The CFB
Acquisition and the LibertyBank Acquisition significantly increased the Bank’s
commercial loan concentration.
At
September 30, 2010, the Company had total assets of $1.5 billion, net loans of
$620.5 million, deposit accounts of $1.2 billion and stockholders’ equity of
$205.1 million.
Operating
Lines
Home
Federal Bancorp’s sole subsidiary is Home Federal Bank. Management has
determined that the Bank, as a whole, is the sole reporting unit and that no
reportable operating segments exist other than Home Federal Bank.
Market
Area
Home
Federal Bank currently has operations in three distinct market
areas. The Bank’s primary market area is the Boise, Idaho,
metropolitan statistical area (“MSA”) and surrounding communities, together
known as the Treasure Valley region of southwestern Idaho, including Ada,
Canyon, Elmore and Gem counties. The CFB Acquisition resulted in the Bank’s
entrance to the Tri-County Region of Central Oregon, including the counties of
Crook, Deschutes and Jefferson. Through the LibertyBank Acquisition, Home
Federal Bank expanded its markets into Lane, Josephine, Jackson, and Multnomah
counties in Western Oregon, including the communities of Eugene, Grants Pass and
Medford, Oregon, in addition to deepening its presence in Central Oregon. The
Bank also has a commercial loan production office in Portland,
Oregon.
The bank
operates through 37 full-service banking offices, automated teller machines and
Internet banking services. Included in our 37 full-service banking offices were
two Wal-Mart in-store branches located in our Idaho Region. For more
information, see "Item 2. Properties."
The
following table summarizes key economic and demographic information about these
market areas:
|
|
Median
Household
Income
|
|
|
Population
Change
|
|
|
Unemployment
Rate(1)
|
|
|
Total
FDIC Deposits
By
County(2)
|
|
|
Home
Federal
Bank’s
Deposit
Market
Share
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2000-2010 |
|
|
Sept 2010
|
|
|
Sept 2009
|
|
|
June 2010
|
|
|
June 2009
|
|
|
June 2010
|
|
Idaho
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canyon
|
|
$ |
48,455 |
|
|
|
44.8 |
% |
|
|
10.4 |
% |
|
|
10.2 |
% |
|
$ |
1,479 |
|
|
$ |
1,379 |
|
|
|
12.6 |
% |
Ada
|
|
|
63,046 |
|
|
|
32.5 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
6,148 |
|
|
|
5,967 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
Gem
|
|
|
43,367 |
|
|
|
15.2 |
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
23.5 |
|
Elmore
|
|
|
45,068 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
18.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oregon
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deschutes
|
|
$ |
53,137 |
|
|
|
46.2 |
% |
|
|
13.1 |
% |
|
|
13.2 |
% |
|
$ |
2,635 |
|
|
$ |
2,716 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
% |
Lane
|
|
|
47,548 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
11.2 |
|
|
|
4,149 |
|
|
|
4,103 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
Josephine
|
|
|
38,770 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
|
12.9 |
|
|
|
12.7 |
|
|
|
1,292 |
|
|
|
1,277 |
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
Jackson
|
|
|
47,042 |
|
|
|
15.1 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
|
|
11.2 |
|
|
|
2,797 |
|
|
|
2,875 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
Crook
|
|
|
43,070 |
|
|
|
30.8 |
|
|
|
15.4 |
|
|
|
15.3 |
|
|
|
213 |
|
|
|
259 |
|
|
|
23.8 |
|
Jefferson
|
|
|
45,122 |
|
|
|
14.8 |
|
|
|
12.6 |
|
|
|
12.3 |
|
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
11.7 |
|
Multnomah
|
|
|
55,707 |
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
17,266 |
|
|
|
16,221 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
National
|
|
$ |
54,442 |
|
|
|
10.6 |
% |
|
|
9.6 |
% |
|
|
10.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
Not seasonally adjusted. September 2010 is preliminary
|
|
(2)
In millions. Excludes deposits in credit unions
|
|
Source:
FDIC, SNL Financial, Bureau of Labor Statistics
|
|
Idaho
Region. The local economy is primarily urban with Boise, the state
capital of Idaho, being the most populous city in Idaho, followed by Nampa, the
state's second largest city. Nearly 40% of the state’s population lives and
works in the four counties of Ada, Canyon, Elmore and Gem that are served by
Home Federal Bank.
The
regional economy is well diversified with government, healthcare, manufacturing,
high technology, call centers and construction providing sources of employment.
In addition, agriculture and related industries continue to be key components of
the economy in southwestern Idaho. Generally, sources of employment are
concentrated in Ada and Canyon counties and include the headquarters of Micron
Technology, J.R. Simplot Company and Boise Cascade, LLC. Other major employers
include Hewlett-Packard, Supervalu, two regional medical centers and Idaho state
government agencies. Boise is also home to Boise State University, the state's
largest university.
The
Treasure Valley has enjoyed strong population growth over the last five years,
which led to an increase in residential community developments. Historically,
the unemployment rate has been lower than the national rate. The current
economic slowdown, which has been led by significant deterioration in
residential home sales, has caused acceleration in unemployment in the Treasure
Valley. This slowdown has created an over-supply of speculative construction and
land development projects. During the build-up of residential construction,
commercial real estate construction accelerated and many speculative
construction commercial projects, as well as existing commercial buildings, are
now vacant, contributing to falling property values. Continued deterioration in
the local economy may result in additional losses in the Bank’s loan portfolio,
restrict management’s ability to execute the Company’s growth plans or impact
the Bank’s liquidity due to a shrinking deposit base. See “Risk
Factors” under Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Central Oregon
Region. Within Central Oregon, Home Federal Bank operates in Deschutes,
Crook and Jefferson Counties. Central Oregon has become a year-round
destination resort for visitors and tourists worldwide offering premiere skiing,
golfing, fishing, hiking, museums, biking, kayaking, festivals and world-class
destination resorts. The largest communities in the Central Oregon Region are
Bend, Redmond and Prineville.
While
much smaller than the Idaho Region, Central Oregon’s economy is primarily driven
by healthcare, government, tourism and other service industries. St. Charles
Medical Center in Bend is the largest private employer
with Les
Schwab Tires Centers, which is headquartered in Central Oregon, call centers and
resorts also within the top ten employers in the region.
Central
Oregon has experienced rapid population growth and significant new construction
has occurred over the last five years as the region’s natural beauty and resorts
gained greater renown. Commercial and residential real estate values increased
rapidly as construction of retail centers and new residential developments
maintained pace with population growth. The median home price in Bend and
Redmond rose 70% between April 2005 and April 2007 when values peaked. However,
the economic slowdown nationally has reduced spending on vacations and tourism
traffic in the region, resulting in very high unemployment. Additionally,
commercial real estate vacancies in the region rose quickly and the median home
prices in September 2010 have fallen approximately 50% from their
peak.
Western Oregon
Region. A benefit from the LibertyBank Acquisition was the expansion of
the Bank’s markets into the communities of Eugene, Springfield, Medford and
Grants Pass, Oregon. The Bank also entered the Portland market through a
commercial loan center that also operates as a limited service branch. Eugene is
Oregon’s second largest city with a population of more than 150,000 people,.
Manufacturing, retail trade and healthcare and social assistance make up nearly
40% of total employment in Lane County. Since the University of Oregon and a
Federal courthouse are located there, government employment helps add stability
to Lane County’s economy. While unemployment in Lane County has not been as
severe as in Central Oregon, it has trended above national unemployment
rates.
Medford,
a city of approximately 75,000 people in the southern Oregon county of Jackson,
has healthcare as the largest employment industry, along with Lithia Motors and
specialty food retailer Harry & David. Nearby Grants Pass, Oregon in
Josephine County, is a city of approximately 33,000 people. The Rogue River
serves as a primary source for tourism in both of these counties.
Operating
Strategy
Management’s
operating strategy centers on the continued development into a full service,
community-oriented bank from a traditional savings and loan business model. Our
goal is to continue to enhance our franchise value and earnings through growth
in our banking operations, especially lending to small to medium-sized
businesses, while maintaining the community-oriented customer service and sales
focus that has characterized our success to date. In order to be successful in
this objective and increase stockholder value, we are committed to the following
strategies:
Continue
Growing in Our Existing Markets. We believe there is a large customer
base in our markets that are dissatisfied with the service received from larger
regional banks. By offering quicker decision making in the delivery of banking
products and services, offering customized products where appropriate, and
providing customer access to our senior managers, we hope to distinguish
ourselves from larger, regional banks operating in our market areas.
Actively Search for Appropriate
Acquisitions. In order to enhance our ability to deliver products and
services in our existing markets and to expand into surrounding markets, we
intend to search for acquisition opportunities, focusing on failed bank
transactions facilitated by the FDIC. We consummated FDIC-assisted transactions
in August 2009 and July 2010 that increased our assets by $881 million, based on
the fair value of assets purchased on the acquisition dates. These acquisitions
were consummated with loss sharing agreements with the FDIC that provide
significant protection against credit loss. However, the long-term success of
such transactions is dependent upon our ability to integrate the operations of
the acquired businesses. We believe that consolidation across the community bank
landscape will continue to take place and further believe that, with our capital
and liquidity positions, approach to credit management and acquisition
experience, we are well positioned to take advantage of FDIC acquisitions. To a
lesser extent, we will also consider whole bank acquisitions through market
transactions that provide the potential for significant earnings growth and
franchise value enhancement.
Expand
Our Product Offerings. We intend to continue our emphasis on originating
commercial lending products that diversify our loan portfolio by increasing the
percentage of assets consisting of higher-yielding commercial real estate and
commercial business loans with higher risk adjusted returns, shorter maturities
and less sensitivity to interest rate fluctuations, while still providing high
quality loan products for single-family residential borrowers through our
secondary market activities. We also intend to selectively add products to
provide diversification of revenue sources and to capture our customers’ full
relationship by cross selling our loan and deposit products and
services
to our customers. We recently completed a conversion of our core processing
system, which we believe will permit us to significantly enhance and expand our
commercial banking applications and products.
Increase
Our Core Deposits. A fundamental part of our overall strategy is to
improve both the level and the mix of deposits that serve as a funding base for
asset growth. By growing demand deposit accounts and other savings and
transaction accounts, we intend to reduce our reliance on higher-cost
certificates of deposit and borrowings such as advances from the Federal Home
Loan Bank of Seattle. In order to expand our core deposit franchise, commercial
deposits are being pursued by the introduction of cash management products and
by specific targeting of small business customers.
Competition
We face
intense competition in originating loans and in attracting deposits within our
targeted geographic markets. We compete by leveraging our full service delivery
capability comprised of 37 convenient branch locations, including two branches
located inside Wal-Mart Superstores offering extended banking hours, call center
and Internet banking, and consistently delivering high-quality, individualized
service to our customers that result in a high level of customer satisfaction.
Our key competitors are U.S. Bank, Wells Fargo, Key Bank and Umpqua Bank. These
competitors control approximately 47% of the deposit market with $9.0 billion of
the $19.1 billion in FDIC-insured deposits in our market areas, excluding
Multnomah County where we have a very small deposit presence, as of June 30,
2010. Aside from these traditional competitors, credit unions, insurance
companies and brokerage firms are an increasingly competing challenge for
consumer deposit relationships.
Our
competition for loans comes principally from mortgage bankers, commercial banks,
credit unions and finance companies. Several other financial institutions,
including those previously mentioned, have greater resources than us and compete
with us for lending business in our targeted market areas. Among the advantages
of some of these institutions are their ability to make larger loans, finance
extensive advertising campaigns, access lower cost funding sources and allocate
their investment assets to regions of highest yield and demand. This competition
for the origination of loans may limit our future growth and earnings
prospects.
Subsidiaries
and Other Activities
Home
Federal Bank is the only subsidiary of Home Federal Bancorp, Inc. Home Federal
Bank has one active wholly-owned subsidiary of its own, Commercial Equipment
Lease Corporation, which the Bank acquired through the LibertyBank Acquisition.
The Bank also acquired a subsidiary through the CFB Acquisition, Community First
Real Estate LLC, which owned three of our banking offices in Central Oregon and
has no significant business activity. The Bank also has three inactive
subsidiaries, Idaho Home Service Corporation, Liberty Funding Inc., and Liberty
Insurance Services Inc. These inactive subsidiaries have no business activities
and the latter two were purchased in the LibertyBank Acquisition.
Personnel
At
September 30, 2010, we had 430 full-time equivalent employees. Our employees are
not represented by any collective bargaining group. We believe our relationship
with our employees is good.
Corporate
Information
Our
principal executive offices are located at 500 12th Avenue South, Nampa, Idaho,
83651. Our telephone number is (208) 466-4634. We maintain
a website with the address www.myhomefed.com/ir. The information contained on
our website is not included as a part of, or incorporated by reference into,
this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Other than an investor’s own Internet access
charges, we make available free of charge through our website our Annual Report
on Form 10-K, Proxy Statements, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current
reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to these reports, as soon as reasonably
practicable after we have electronically filed such material with, or furnished
such material to, the Securities and Exchange Commission. We have also posted
our code of ethics and board committee charters on this site.
Lending Activities
General. Historically, our
principal lending activity has consisted of the origination of loans secured by
first mortgages on owner-occupied, one-to-four family residences and loans for
the construction of one-to-four family residences. We also originate consumer
loans, with an emphasis on home equity loans and lines of credit. While we
intend to increase our commercial and small business loans, a substantial
portion of our loan portfolio is currently secured by real estate, either as
primary or secondary collateral.
At
September 30, 2010, the maximum amount of credit that we could have extended to
any one borrower and the borrower's related entities under applicable
regulations was $23.5 million. Our largest single borrower relationship at
September 30, 2010, included two commercial real estate loans and an operating
line of credit totaling $11.9 million. The second largest lending
relationship included seven loans primarily for commercial real estate and
commercial lots totaling $9.7 million. Our third largest borrower
relationship totals $7.9 million consisting of three loans including a term
equipment note, operating line of credit and personal business line of
credit. The fourth largest lending relationship was four Executive
Lines of Credit, three term working capital loans, two revolving lines of credit
and a performance bond totaling $7.9 million. The fifth largest
lending relationship included twenty nine loans to a residential real estate
developer on speculative loans which have been converted to rentals totaling
$7.1 million. All of these loans, including those made to
corporations, have personal guarantees in place as an additional source of
repayment, are substantially secured by property or assets in our primary market
area, and 80% of losses are covered by the FDIC under a purchase and assumption
agreement with loss sharing. $9.4 million of these loans were
considered as classified at September 30, 2010, but were not in
default.
At
September 30, 2010, the largest lending relationship not covered by the loss
sharing agreements totaled $6.1 million and consisted of two notes representing
a commercial real estate loan and an operating line of credit. The second
largest noncovered lending relationship of $5.4 million consists of 15 loans for
residential construction and land and lots. The third largest noncovered lending
relationship was $5.0 million includes four commercial real estate
loans.
One-to-four Family Residential Real
Estate Lending. We originate both fixed-rate loans and adjustable-rate
loans in our residential lending program. Generally, these loans are originated
to meet the requirements of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac for sale in the secondary
market to investors. We generally underwrite our one-to-four family loans based
on the applicant's employment, debt to income levels, credit history and the
appraised value of the subject property. Generally, we lend up to 80% of the
lesser of the appraised value or purchase price for one-to-four family
residential loans. In situations where we grant a loan with a loan-to-value
ratio in excess of 80%, we generally require private mortgage insurance in order
to reduce our exposure to 80% or less. Properties securing our one-to-four
family loans are generally appraised by independent fee appraisers who have been
approved by us. We require our borrowers to obtain title and hazard insurance,
and flood insurance, if necessary, in an amount equal to the regulatory
maximum.
Real Estate Construction. Most
construction loans originated by us are written with maturities of up to one
year, have interest rates that are tied to The Wall Street Journal Prime
rate plus a margin, and are subject to periodic rate adjustments tied to the
movement of the prime rate. All builder/borrower loans are underwritten to the
same standards as other commercial loan credits, requiring minimum debt service
coverage ratios and established cash reserves to carry projects through
construction completion and sale of the project. The maximum loan-to-value ratio
on both pre-sold and speculative projects originated by us is 80%.
We
originate construction and site development loans to contractors and builders
primarily to finance the construction of single-family homes and subdivisions,
which homes typically have an average price ranging from $150,000 to $400,000.
Loans to finance the construction of single-family homes and subdivisions are
generally offered to experienced builders in our primary market areas. The
maximum loan-to-value limit applicable to construction and site development
loans is 80% and 70%, respectively, of the appraised market value upon
completion of the project. Maturity dates for residential construction loans are
largely a function of the estimated construction period of the project, and
generally do not exceed 36 months for residential subdivision development loans.
Substantially all of our residential construction loans have adjustable rates of
interest based on the Wall
Street Journal prime rate and during the term of construction, the
accumulated interest is added to the principal of the loan through an interest
reserve.
We
originate land loans to local contractors and developers for the purpose of
holding the land for future development. These loans are secured by a first lien
on the property, are limited to 50% of the lower of the acquisition price or the
appraised value of the land, and generally have a term of up to two years with
an interest rate based on the
Wall Street Journal prime rate. Our land loans are generally
secured by property in our primary market areas. We require title insurance and,
if applicable, a hazardous waste survey reporting that the land is free of
hazardous or toxic waste.
Our
construction and land development loans are based upon estimates of costs and
value associated with the completed project. These estimates may be inaccurate.
Construction and land development lending involves additional risks when
compared with permanent residential lending because funds are advanced upon the
security of the project, which is of uncertain value prior to its completion.
Because of the uncertainties inherent in estimating construction costs, as well
as the market value of the completed project and the effects of governmental
regulation of real property, it is relatively difficult to evaluate accurately
the total funds required to complete a project and the related loan-to-value
ratio. This type of lending also typically involves higher loan principal
amounts and is often concentrated with a small number of builders. These loans
often involve the disbursement of substantial funds with repayment substantially
dependent on the success of the ultimate project and the ability of the borrower
to sell or lease the property or obtain permanent take-out financing, rather
than the ability of the borrower or guarantor to repay principal and interest.
If our appraisal of the value of a completed project proves to be overstated, we
generally require cash curtailments or additional collateral to support the
shortfall.
Commercial and Multi-Family Real
Estate Lending. Multi-family and commercial real estate loans generally
are priced at a higher rate of interest than one-to-four family residential
loans. Typically, these loans have higher loan balances, are more difficult to
evaluate and monitor, and involve a greater degree of risk than one-to-four
family residential loans. Often payments on loans secured by multi-family or
commercial properties are dependent on the successful operation and management
of the property; therefore, repayment of these loans may be affected by adverse
conditions in the real estate market or the economy. We generally require and
obtain loan guarantees from financially capable parties based upon the review of
personal financial statements. If the borrower is a corporation, we generally
require and obtain personal guarantees from the corporate principals based upon
a review of their personal financial statements and individual credit
reports.
We target
individual multi-family and commercial real estate loans to small and mid-size
owner occupants and investors between $500,000 and $2.0 million; however, we can
by policy originate loans to one borrower up to 80% of our regulatory limit. As
of September 30, 2010, the maximum we could lend to any one borrower based on
this limit was $18.7 million. Commercial real estate loans are primarily secured
by office and warehouse space, professional buildings, retail sites, multifamily
residential buildings, industrial facilities and restaurants located in our
primary market areas.
We have
offered both fixed and adjustable-rate loans on multi-family and commercial real
estate loans, although most of these loans are now originated with adjustable
rates with amortization terms up to 25 years and maturities of up to 10 years.
Commercial and multi-family real estate loans are originated with rates that
generally adjust after an initial period ranging from three to five years and
are generally priced utilizing the applicable FHLB borrowing rate plus an
acceptable margin. Prepayment penalty structures are applied for each rate lock
period.
The
maximum loan-to-value ratio for commercial and multi-family real estate loans is
generally 75% on purchases and refinances. We require appraisals of all
properties securing commercial and multi-family real estate loans. Appraisals
are performed by independent appraisers designated by us or by our staff
appraiser. We require our commercial and multi-family real estate loan borrowers
with outstanding balances in excess of $500,000 to submit annual financial
statements and rent rolls on the subject property. We also inspect the subject
property at least every three to five years if the loan balance exceeds
$250,000. We generally require a minimum pro forma debt coverage ratio of 1.25
times for loans secured by commercial and multi-family properties.
Approximately
$106.0 million, or 28.9%, of our noncovered loan portfolio is comprised of loans
secured by nonowner-occupied commercial real estate. These loans typically
involve higher principal amounts than other types of loans, and repayment is
dependent upon income generated, or expected to be generated, by the property
securing the loan in amounts sufficient to cover operating expenses and debt
service, which may be adversely affected by changes in the economy or local
market conditions. For example, if the cash flow from the borrower’s project is
reduced as a result of leases not being obtained or renewed, the borrower’s
ability to repay the loan may be
impaired.
Commercial and multi-family mortgage loans also expose a lender to greater
credit risk than loans secured by residential real estate because the collateral
securing these loans typically cannot be sold as easily as residential real
estate. In addition, many of our commercial and multifamily real estate loans
are not fully amortizing and contain large balloon payments upon maturity. Such
balloon payments may require the borrower to either sell or refinance the
underlying property in order to make the payment, which may increase the risk of
default or non-payment. If we foreclose on a commercial or multi-family real
estate loan, our holding period for the collateral typically is longer than for
one-to-four family residential mortgage loans because there are fewer potential
purchasers of the collateral. Additionally, commercial and multi-family real
estate loans generally have relatively large balances to single borrowers or
related groups of borrowers. Accordingly, if we make any errors in judgment in
the collectability of our commercial and multi-family real estate loans, any
resulting charge-offs may be larger on a per loan basis than those incurred with
our residential or consumer loan portfolios.
Consumer Lending. To a much
lesser degree than commercial and residential loans, we offer a variety of
consumer loans to our customers, including home equity loans and lines of
credit, savings account loans, automobile loans, recreational vehicle loans and
personal unsecured loans. Generally, consumer loans have shorter terms to
maturity and higher interest rates than mortgage loans.
At
September 30, 2010, the largest component of the consumer loan portfolio
consisted of home equity loans and lines of credit. Home equity loans are made
for, among other purposes, the improvement of residential properties, debt
consolidation and education expenses. The majority of these loans are secured by
a first or second mortgage on residential property. The maximum loan-to-value
ratio is 80%, when taking into account both the balance of the home equity loan
and the first mortgage loan. Home equity lines of credit allow for a ten-year
draw period, plus an additional ten year repayment period, and the interest rate
is tied to the Prime rate as published in The Wall Street Journal, and
may include a margin.
Consumer
loans entail greater risk than do residential first-lien mortgage loans,
particularly in the case of consumer loans that are unsecured or secured by
rapidly depreciating assets such as automobiles, and in second-lien loans such
as home equity lines of credit in markets where residential property values have
declined significantly since fiscal year 2007. In these cases, any repossessed
collateral for a defaulted consumer loan may not provide an adequate source of
repayment of the outstanding loan balance as a result of the greater likelihood
of damage, loss or depreciation. The remaining deficiency often does not warrant
further substantial collection efforts against the borrower beyond obtaining a
deficiency judgment when allowed by law. In addition, consumer loan collections
are dependent on the borrower's continuing financial stability, and are more
likely to be adversely affected by job loss, divorce, illness or personal
bankruptcy. Furthermore, the application of various federal and state laws,
including bankruptcy and insolvency laws, may limit the amount that can be
recovered on these loans. These risks are not as prevalent with respect to our
consumer loan portfolio because a large percentage of the portfolio consists of
home equity loans and lines of credit that are underwritten in a manner such
that they result in credit risk that is substantially similar to one-to-four
family residential mortgage loans. Nevertheless, home equity loans and lines of
credit have greater credit risk than one-to-four family residential mortgage
loans because they are secured by mortgages subordinated to the existing first
mortgage on the property, which we may or may not hold. In addition, we do not
have private mortgage insurance coverage for these loans. We do not actively
participate in wholesale or brokered home equity loan origination.
Commercial Business Lending.
As part of our strategic plan, we are focusing on increasing the
commercial business loans that we originate, including lines of credit, term
loans and letters of credit. These loans are typically secured by collateral and
are used for general business purposes, including working capital financing,
equipment financing, capital investment and general investment. Loan terms vary
from one to seven years. The interest rates on such loans are generally floating
rates indexed to the Wall
Street Journal Prime rate plus a margin.
Commercial
business loans typically have shorter maturity terms and higher interest spreads
than real estate loans, but generally involve more credit risk because of the
type and nature of the collateral. We are focusing our efforts on small to
medium-sized, privately-held companies with local or regional businesses that
operate in our market area. Our commercial business lending policy includes
credit file documentation and analysis of the borrower’s background, capacity to
repay the loan, the adequacy of the borrower’s capital and collateral, as well
as an evaluation of other conditions affecting the borrower. Analysis of the
borrower’s past, present and future cash flows is also an important aspect of
our credit analysis. We generally obtain personal guarantees on our commercial
business loans.
Repayment
of our commercial business loans is generally dependent on the cash flows of the
borrower, which may be unpredictable, and the collateral securing these loans
may fluctuate in value. Our commercial business loans are originated primarily
based on the identified cash flow of the borrower and secondarily on the general
liquidity and secondary cash flow support of the borrower. Advance ratios
against collateral provide additional support to repay the loan. Most often,
this collateral consists of accounts receivable, inventory or equipment. Credit
support provided by the borrower for most of these loans and the probability of
repayment is based on the liquidation of the pledged collateral and enforcement
of a personal guarantee, if any. As a result, in the case of loans secured by
accounts receivable, the availability of funds for the repayment of these loans
may be substantially dependent on the ability of the borrower to collect amounts
due from its customers. The collateral securing other loans may depreciate over
time, may be difficult to appraise and may fluctuate in value based on the
success of the business.
Nearly
all of our commercial business loans (approximately $98.5 million at September
30, 2010) were purchased from the FDIC in connection with the CFB Acquisition
and the LibertyBank acquisition. All of the purchased commercial business loans
in these acquisitions are covered under loss sharing agreements with the
FDIC.
Commercial
business loans include equipment finance agreements for the purchase
of personal property, business equipment and titled vehicles and construction
equipment. Generally these agreements have terms of 60 months or less and
the lessee is granted title of the collateral at the end of the term. All of
these financing agreements were assets of CELC, the operations of
which were assumed by the Bank in the LibertyBank Acquisition, and nearly all of
them are covered under a loss share agreement with the FDIC. Equipment
finance agreements included in commercial business loans totaled $43.2
million at September 30, 2010, net of purchase accounting adjustments. CELC also
originated leases on personal property and business assets under terms similar
to those collateralized by the financing agreements described above.
However, at the end of the lease term, the collateral is returned to CELC and
the Bank, at which point the collateral is sold through a nationwide network of
brokers. Leases totaled $7.0 million at September 30, 2010, net of purchase
accounting adjustments. Nearly all of the leases outstanding at September 30,
2010, were covered under a loss sharing agreement with the FDIC. Currently, no
new leases or commercial loans are being originated by CELC as we have decided
to wind down the operations of CELC over the next several years.
Our
leases entail many of the same types of risks as our commercial business loans.
As with commercial business loans, the collateral securing our lease loans may
depreciate over time, may be difficult to appraise and may fluctuate in value.
We rely on the lessee's continuing financial stability, rather than the value of
the leased equipment, for the repayment of all required amounts under lease
loans. In the event of a default on a lease, it is unlikely that the proceeds
from the sale of the leased equipment will be sufficient to satisfy the
outstanding unpaid amounts under the terms of the loan.
Lease
residual value represents the present value of the estimated fair value of the
leased equipment at the termination date of the lease. Realization of these
residual values depends on many factors, including management’s use of
estimates, assumptions, and judgment to determine such values. Several other
factors outside of our control may reduce the residual values realized,
including general market conditions at the time of expiration of the lease,
whether there has been technological or economic obsolescence or unusual wear
and tear on, or use of, the equipment and the cost of comparable
equipment. If, upon the expiration of a lease, we sell the equipment
and the amount realized is less than the recorded value of the residual interest
in the equipment, we will recognize a loss reflecting the
difference. We review the lease residuals for potential impairment
monthly.
Loan Portfolio Analysis. We
refer to loans and leases subject to the loss sharing agreements with the FDIC
as “covered loans.” All loans purchased in the CFB Acquisition were covered
loans. Consumer loans not secured by real estate that were purchased in the
LibertyBank Acquisition are not subject to the loss sharing agreements. These
loans totaled $5.2 million at September 30, 2010. All other loans and leases
purchased in the LibertyBank Acquisition are covered loans. Within this Annual
Report on Form 10-K, we segregate covered loans from our noncovered loan
portfolio, since we are afforded significant protection from credit losses on
covered loans due to the loss sharing agreements. The following table summarizes
covered loans at September 30, 2010 and 2009:
Dollars
in thousands
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
Real
estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-to-four
family residential
|
|
$ |
20,445 |
|
|
|
7.58 |
% |
|
$ |
8,537 |
|
|
|
6.76 |
% |
Multi-family
residential
|
|
|
10,286 |
|
|
|
3.82 |
|
|
|
6,270 |
|
|
|
4.96 |
|
Commercial
|
|
|
83,794 |
|
|
|
31.09 |
|
|
|
61,601 |
|
|
|
48.75 |
|
Total real
estate
|
|
|
114,525 |
|
|
|
42.49 |
|
|
|
76,408 |
|
|
|
60.47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real
estate construction:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-to-four family
residential
|
|
|
16,884 |
|
|
|
6.26 |
|
|
|
3,128 |
|
|
|
2.48 |
|
Multi-family
residential
|
|
|
1,018 |
|
|
|
0.38 |
|
|
|
1,521 |
|
|
|
1.20 |
|
Commercial and land
development
|
|
|
13,246 |
|
|
|
4.91 |
|
|
|
17,230 |
|
|
|
13.64 |
|
Total real estate
construction
|
|
|
31,148 |
|
|
|
11.55 |
|
|
|
21,879 |
|
|
|
17.32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity
|
|
|
16,124 |
|
|
|
5.98 |
|
|
|
6,728 |
|
|
|
5.32 |
|
Automobile
|
|
|
683 |
|
|
|
0.25 |
|
|
|
1,188 |
|
|
|
0.94 |
|
Other consumer
|
|
|
1,434 |
|
|
|
0.53 |
|
|
|
1,850 |
|
|
|
1.46 |
|
Total consumer
|
|
|
18,241 |
|
|
|
6.76 |
|
|
|
9,766 |
|
|
|
7.72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
business
|
|
|
99,045 |
|
|
|
36.75 |
|
|
|
18,312 |
|
|
|
14.49 |
|
Leases
|
|
|
6,592 |
|
|
|
2.45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- |
|
Gross covered loans and
leases
|
|
|
269,551 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
126,365 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance
for loan losses, covered loans
|
|
|
(3,527 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,812 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Covered loans receivable,
net
|
|
$ |
266,024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
109,553 |
|
|
|
|
|
The
following table sets forth the composition of the Company’s loan portfolio,
including covered and noncovered loans, by type of loan at the dates
indicated:
|
|
At
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars
in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real
estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-to-four family
residential
|
|
$ |
157,574 |
|
|
|
24.75 |
% |
|
$ |
178,311 |
|
|
|
33.01 |
% |
|
$ |
210,501 |
|
|
|
45.23 |
% |
|
$ |
249,545 |
|
|
|
51.55 |
% |
|
$ |
293,640 |
|
|
|
57.88 |
% |
Multi-family
residential
|
|
|
20,759 |
|
|
|
3.26 |
|
|
|
16,286 |
|
|
|
3.01 |
|
|
|
8,477 |
|
|
|
1.82 |
|
|
|
6,864 |
|
|
|
1.42 |
|
|
|
7,049 |
|
|
|
1.39 |
|
Commercial
|
|
|
228,643 |
|
|
|
35.93 |
|
|
|
213,471 |
|
|
|
39.52 |
|
|
|
151,733 |
|
|
|
32.61 |
|
|
|
133,823 |
|
|
|
27.64 |
|
|
|
125,401 |
|
|
|
24.72 |
|
Total real
estate
|
|
|
406,976 |
|
|
|
63.94 |
|
|
|
408,068 |
|
|
|
75.54 |
|
|
|
370,711 |
|
|
|
79.66 |
|
|
|
390,232 |
|
|
|
80.61 |
|
|
|
426,090 |
|
|
|
83.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real
estate construction:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-to-four family
residential
|
|
|
24,707 |
|
|
|
3.88 |
|
|
|
10,871 |
|
|
|
2.01 |
|
|
|
13,448 |
|
|
|
2.89 |
|
|
|
20,545 |
|
|
|
4.24 |
|
|
|
23,678 |
|
|
|
4.67 |
|
Multi-family
residential
|
|
|
2,657 |
|
|
|
0.42 |
|
|
|
10,417 |
|
|
|
1.93 |
|
|
|
920 |
|
|
|
0.20 |
|
|
|
1,770 |
|
|
|
0.37 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
Commercial and land
development
|
|
21,190 |
|
|
|
3.33 |
|
|
|
27,144 |
|
|
|
5.02 |
|
|
|
18,674 |
|
|
|
4.01 |
|
|
|
21,899 |
|
|
|
4.52 |
|
|
|
16,344 |
|
|
|
3.22 |
|
Total real estate
construction
|
|
|
48,554 |
|
|
|
7.63 |
|
|
|
48,432 |
|
|
|
8.96 |
|
|
|
33,042 |
|
|
|
7.10 |
|
|
|
44,214 |
|
|
|
9.13 |
|
|
|
40,022 |
|
|
|
7.89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home
equity
|
|
|
56,745 |
|
|
|
8.91 |
|
|
|
53,368 |
|
|
|
9.88 |
|
|
|
52,954 |
|
|
|
11.38 |
|
|
|
42,990 |
|
|
|
8.88 |
|
|
|
34,143 |
|
|
|
6.73 |
|
Automobile
|
|
|
1,466 |
|
|
|
0.23 |
|
|
|
2,364 |
|
|
|
0.44 |
|
|
|
1,903 |
|
|
|
0.41 |
|
|
|
2,173 |
|
|
|
0.45 |
|
|
|
3,245 |
|
|
|
0.64 |
|
Other
consumer
|
|
|
7,762 |
|
|
|
1.22 |
|
|
|
3,734 |
|
|
|
0.69 |
|
|
|
1,370 |
|
|
|
0.29 |
|
|
|
1,405 |
|
|
|
0.29 |
|
|
|
1,300 |
|
|
|
0.26 |
|
Total
consumer
|
|
|
65,973 |
|
|
|
10.36 |
|
|
|
59,466 |
|
|
|
11.01 |
|
|
|
56,227 |
|
|
|
12.08 |
|
|
|
46,568 |
|
|
|
9.62 |
|
|
|
38,688 |
|
|
|
7.63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
business
|
|
|
108,051 |
|
|
|
16.97 |
|
|
|
24,256 |
|
|
|
4.49 |
|
|
|
5,385 |
|
|
|
1.16 |
|
|
|
3,122 |
|
|
|
0.64 |
|
|
|
2,480 |
|
|
|
0.49 |
|
Leases
|
|
|
6,999 |
|
|
|
1.10 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Gross
loans
|
|
|
636,553 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
540,222 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
465,365 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
484,136 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
507,280 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred loan
fees
|
|
|
628 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
858 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
973 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,241 |
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan
losses
|
|
|
15,432 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,735 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,579 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,988 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,974 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable,
net
|
|
$ |
620,493 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
510,629 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
459,813 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
480,118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
503,065 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loan Maturity and Repricing.
The following table sets forth certain information at September 30, 2010,
regarding the dollar amount of loans maturing based on their contractual terms
to maturity, but does not include scheduled payments or potential prepayments.
Demand loans, loans having no stated schedule of repayments and no stated
maturity are reported as due in one year or less. Loan balances do not include
undisbursed loan proceeds, unearned discounts, unearned income and allowance for
loan losses.
|
|
Within
1
Year
|
|
|
After
1
Year
Through
3
Years
|
|
|
After
3
Years
Through
5
Years
|
|
|
After
5
Years
Through
10
Years
|
|
|
Beyond
10
Years
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
Real
estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-to-four family
residential
|
|
$ |
4,366 |
|
|
$ |
8,375 |
|
|
$ |
5,852 |
|
|
$ |
36,862 |
|
|
$ |
102,119 |
|
|
$ |
157,574 |
|
Multi-family
residential
|
|
|
3,394 |
|
|
|
1,830 |
|
|
|
2,935 |
|
|
|
5,074 |
|
|
|
7,526 |
|
|
|
20,759 |
|
Commercial
|
|
|
12,252 |
|
|
|
21,550 |
|
|
|
15,579 |
|
|
|
68,142 |
|
|
|
111,120 |
|
|
|
228,643 |
|
Total real
estate
|
|
|
20,012 |
|
|
|
31,755 |
|
|
|
24,366 |
|
|
|
110,078 |
|
|
|
220,765 |
|
|
|
406,976 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real
estate construction:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-to-four family
residential
|
|
|
17,813 |
|
|
|
5,413 |
|
|
|
1,075 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
310 |
|
|
|
24,707 |
|
Multi-family
residential
|
|
|
2,399 |
|
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2,657 |
|
Commercial and land
development
|
|
|
17,769 |
|
|
|
2,623 |
|
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
372 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
21,190 |
|
Total real estate
construction
|
|
|
37,981 |
|
|
|
8,294 |
|
|
|
1,342 |
|
|
|
468 |
|
|
|
469 |
|
|
|
48,554 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity
|
|
|
428 |
|
|
|
2,905 |
|
|
|
5,270 |
|
|
|
32,953 |
|
|
|
15,189 |
|
|
|
56,745 |
|
Automobile
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
488 |
|
|
|
399 |
|
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
312 |
|
|
|
1,466 |
|
Other consumer
|
|
|
3,276 |
|
|
|
1,180 |
|
|
|
752 |
|
|
|
1,036 |
|
|
|
1,518 |
|
|
|
7,762 |
|
Total consumer
|
|
|
3,763 |
|
|
|
4,573 |
|
|
|
6,421 |
|
|
|
34,197 |
|
|
|
17,019 |
|
|
|
65,973 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
business
|
|
|
32,054 |
|
|
|
43,833 |
|
|
|
23,720 |
|
|
|
7,781 |
|
|
|
663 |
|
|
|
108,051 |
|
Leases
|
|
|
1,049 |
|
|
|
4,616 |
|
|
|
1,334 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
6,999 |
|
Gross loans
|
|
$ |
94,859 |
|
|
$ |
93,071 |
|
|
$ |
57,183 |
|
|
$ |
152,524 |
|
|
$ |
238,916 |
|
|
$ |
636,553 |
|
The
following table sets forth the dollar amount of all loans maturing more than one
year after September 30, 2010, which have fixed interest rates and have floating
or adjustable interest rates:
|
|
Floating
or
Adjustable
Rate
|
|
|
Fixed
Rates
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
Real
estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-to-four
family residential
|
|
$ |
63,006 |
|
|
$ |
90,202 |
|
|
$ |
153,208 |
|
Multi-family
residential
|
|
|
15,224 |
|
|
|
2,141 |
|
|
|
17,365 |
|
Commercial
|
|
|
178,192 |
|
|
|
38,199 |
|
|
|
216,391 |
|
Total
real estate
|
|
|
256,422 |
|
|
|
130,542 |
|
|
|
386,964 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real
estate construction:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-to-four
family residential
|
|
|
3,632 |
|
|
|
3,262 |
|
|
|
6,894 |
|
Multi-family
residential
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
258 |
|
Commercial
and land development
|
|
|
2,748 |
|
|
|
673 |
|
|
|
3,421 |
|
Total
real estate construction
|
|
|
6,380 |
|
|
|
4,193 |
|
|
|
10,573 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home
equity
|
|
|
43,125 |
|
|
|
13,192 |
|
|
|
56,317 |
|
Automobile
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
1,360 |
|
|
|
1,407 |
|
Other
consumer
|
|
|
1,034 |
|
|
|
3,452 |
|
|
|
4,486 |
|
Total
consumer
|
|
|
44,206 |
|
|
|
18,004 |
|
|
|
62,210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
business
|
|
|
12,363 |
|
|
|
63,634 |
|
|
|
75,997 |
|
Leases
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
5,950 |
|
|
|
5,950 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
loans receivable
|
|
$ |
319,371 |
|
|
$ |
222,323 |
|
|
$ |
541,694 |
|
Loan Solicitation and Processing.
As part of our commercial banking strategy, we are focusing our efforts
in increasing the amount of direct originations of commercial business loans,
followed by commercial and multi-family real estate loans and to a lesser extent
construction loans to builders and developers. Residential real estate loans are
solicited through media advertising, direct mail to existing customers and by
realtor referrals. Loan originations are further supported by lending services
offered through our internet website, advertising, cross-selling and through our
employees' community service.
Upon
receipt of a loan application from a prospective borrower, we obtain a credit
report and other data to verify specific information relating to the applicant's
employment, income and credit standing. An appraisal of the real estate offered
as collateral is undertaken by a licensed appraiser we have retained and
approved.
Mortgage
loan applications are initiated by loan officers and are required to be approved
by our underwriting staff who has appropriately delegated lending authority.
Loans that exceed the underwriter’s lending authority must be approved by a
Credit Officer with adequate lending authority. We require title insurance on
real estate loans as well as fire and casualty insurance on all secured loans
and on home equity loans and lines of credit where the property serves as
collateral.
Loan Originations, Servicing,
Purchases and Sales. During the year ended September 30, 2010, our total
loan originations were $146.5 million. Nearly all first lien residential
mortgages are sold to the secondary market at the time of origination. During
the year ended September 30, 2010, we sold $26.9 million of single family
residential loans into the secondary market including $6.9 million in loans
originated in fiscal year 2009. Our secondary market relationships have been
major correspondent banks.
One-to-four
family home loans are generally originated in accordance with the guidelines
established by Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, with the exception of our special
community development loans under the Community Reinvestment Act. We utilize the
Freddie Mac Loan Prospector and Fannie Mae Desktop Underwriter automated
loan
systems to underwrite the majority of our residential first mortgage loans
(excluding community development loans). The remaining loans are underwritten by
designated real estate loan underwriters internally in accordance with standards
as provided by our Board-approved loan policy. The underwriting criteria we use
on loans that are not sold to investors and retained in our portfolio are at
least as stringent as those we use for the loans we sell.
All of
our one-to-four family residential loans are sold into the secondary market with
servicing released. Loans are generally sold on a non-recourse basis. In
December 2008, we sold our servicing rights on loans we had previously sold to
Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae and the FHLB. At September 30, 2010, we serviced $291.8
million of commercial and multifamily residential real estate loans for the FDIC
that were not sold to us in the LibertyBank Acquisition pursuant to an interim
servicing agreement that was included in the purchase and assumption agreement
with the FDIC in the LibertyBank Acquisition. We currently anticipate the FDIC
will convert these loans from our core system prior to December 31, 2010, and we
will no longer service these loans for the FDIC once they have been
converted.
The
following table shows total loans originated, purchased, sold and repaid during
the periods indicated:
|
|
Year
Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
Loans
originated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real
estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-to-four
family residential (1)
|
|
$ |
31,209 |
|
|
$ |
67,701 |
|
|
$ |
48,114 |
|
Multi-family
residential
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
1,819 |
|
Commercial
|
|
|
12,429 |
|
|
|
32,477 |
|
|
|
47,662 |
|
Total
real estate
|
|
|
43,690 |
|
|
|
100,252 |
|
|
|
97,595 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real
estate construction:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-to-four
family residential
|
|
|
36,927 |
|
|
|
12,530 |
|
|
|
17,853 |
|
Multi-family
residential
|
|
|
3,617 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
Commercial
and land development
|
|
|
4,497 |
|
|
|
12,266 |
|
|
|
14,152 |
|
Total
real estate construction
|
|
|
45,041 |
|
|
|
24,796 |
|
|
|
32,005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home
equity
|
|
|
12,067 |
|
|
|
15,265 |
|
|
|
35,339 |
|
Automobile
|
|
|
411 |
|
|
|
192 |
|
|
|
894 |
|
Other
consumer
|
|
|
3,023 |
|
|
|
2,643 |
|
|
|
3,104 |
|
Total
consumer
|
|
|
15,501 |
|
|
|
18,100 |
|
|
|
39,337 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
business, including advances
on lines of credit
|
|
|
42,286 |
|
|
|
20,106 |
|
|
|
21,352 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
loans originated
|
|
|
146,518 |
|
|
|
163,254 |
|
|
|
190,289 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
purchased:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loans purchased in Acquisition
|
|
|
197,596 |
|
|
|
129,162 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
sold:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-to-four
family residential
|
|
|
(26,937 |
) |
|
|
(68,801 |
) |
|
|
(47,968 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal
repayments
|
|
|
(175,099 |
) |
|
|
(130,669 |
) |
|
|
(161,575 |
) |
Transfer
to real estate owned
|
|
|
(24,659 |
) |
|
|
(19,513 |
) |
|
|
(1,394 |
) |
Increase
(decrease) in allowance for loan
losses and other items, net
|
|
|
(3,282 |
) |
|
|
(24,586 |
) |
|
|
(1,730 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
increase (decrease) in loans receivable
and loans held for sale
|
|
$ |
114,137 |
|
|
$ |
48,847 |
|
|
$ |
(22,378 |
) |
________________
(1)
|
Includes
originations of loans held for sale of $31.2 million, $66.8 million, and
$45.9 million for the years ended September 30, 2010, 2009, and 2008,
respectively.
|
Loan Origination and Other Fees.
In some instances, we receive loan origination fees on real estate
related products. Loan fees generally represent a percentage of the principal
amount of the loan, and are paid by the borrower. Accounting standards require
that certain fees received, net of certain origination costs, be deferred and
amortized over the contractual life of the loan. Net deferred fees or costs
associated with loans that are prepaid or sold are recognized as income at the
time of prepayment.
Asset
Quality
The
objective of our loan review process is to determine risk levels and exposure to
loss. The depth of review varies by asset types, depending on the nature of
those assets. While certain assets may represent a substantial investment and
warrant individual reviews, other assets may have less risk because the asset
size is small, the risk is spread over a large number of obligors or the
obligations are well collateralized and further analysis of individual assets
would expand the review process without measurable advantage to risk assessment.
Asset types with these characteristics may be reviewed as a total portfolio on
the basis of risk indicators such as delinquency (consumer and residential real
estate loans) or credit rating. A formal review process is conducted on
individual assets that represent greater potential risk.
A formal
review process is a total reevaluation of the risks associated with the asset
and is documented by completing an asset review report. Certain real
estate-related assets must be evaluated in terms of their fair market value or
net realizable value in order to determine the likelihood of loss exposure and,
consequently, the adequacy of valuation allowances. Appraisals on loans secured
by consumer real estate are updated when the loan becomes 120 days past due, or
earlier if circumstances indicate the borrower will be unable to repay the loan
under the terms of the note. Additionally, appraisals are updated if the
borrower requests a modification to their loan. On commercial business loans,
appraisals are updated upon a determination that the borrower will be unable to
repay the loan according to the terms of the note or upon a notice of default,
whichever is earlier. Appraisals are updated on all loan types immediately prior
to a foreclosure sale and quarterly thereafter once the collateral title has
been transferred to the Bank.
The
lending production and credit administration and approval departments are
segregated to maintain objectivity. Once booked, commercial loans are
subject to periodic review through our quarterly loan review process, annual
loan officer reviews, an annual credit review by an independent third party, and
by our annual safety and soundness examinations by our primary
regulator.
We
generally assess late fees or penalty charges on delinquent loans of five
percent of the monthly principal and interest amount. The borrower is given a 10
to 15-day grace period to make the loan payment depending on loan type. When a
borrower fails to make a required payment when it is due, we institute
collection procedures. The first notice is mailed to the borrower on the day
following the expiration of the grace period requesting payment and assessing a
late charge. Attempts to contact the borrower by telephone generally begin upon
the 15th day of delinquency. If a satisfactory response is not obtained,
continual follow-up contacts are attempted until the loan has been brought
current. Before the 60th day of delinquency, attempts to interview the borrower
are made to establish the cause of the delinquency, whether the cause is
temporary, the attitude of the borrower toward the debt and a mutually
satisfactory arrangement for curing the default.
The Board
of Directors is informed monthly as to the number and dollar amount of loans
that are delinquent by more than 30 days, and is given information regarding
classified assets.
If a
borrower is chronically delinquent and all reasonable means of obtaining
payments have been exercised, we will seek to recover any collateral securing
the loan according to the terms of the security instrument and applicable law.
In the event of an unsecured loan, we will either seek legal action against the
borrower or refer the loan to an outside collection agency.
Delinquent Loans. The
following table shows our delinquent loans by the type of loan and number of
days delinquent as of September 30, 2010, that were still accruing
interest:
|
|
Noncovered
Loans Delinquent For:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Covered
|
|
|
|
30-89
Days
|
|
|
Over
90 Days
|
|
|
Delinquent Loans(1)
|
|
|
|
Number
of
Loans
|
|
|
Principal
Balance
Loans
|
|
|
Number
of
Loans
|
|
|
Principal
Balance
Loans
|
|
|
Number
of
Loans
|
|
|
Principal
Balance
Loans
|
|
|
|
(dollars
in thousands)
|
|
Real
estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-to-four
family residential
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
$ |
4,679 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
$ |
60 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
-- |
|
Multi-family
residential
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
Commercial
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2,328 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
Total
real estate
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
7,007 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real
estate construction:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-to-four
family residential
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
Multi-family
residential
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
Commercial
and land development
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
695 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
Total
real estate construction
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
695 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home
equity
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
Automobile
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Other
consumer
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Total
consumer
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
339 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
business
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
421 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
401 |
|
Total
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
$ |
8,462 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
$ |
116 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
$ |
435 |
|
_______________________
(1)
|
Does
not include covered loans purchased in the LibertyBank Acquisition that
have been aggregated into pools and accounted for under ASC
310-30
|
Impaired and purchased credit
impaired loans. A loan is considered impaired when, based upon currently
known information, it is deemed probable that we will be unable to collect all
amounts due as scheduled according to the original terms of the
agreement. Impaired loans are measured based on the present value of
expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate or
the fair value of collateral, if the loan is collateral dependent. Estimated
probable losses on non-homogenous loans (generally commercial real estate and
acquisition and land development loans) in the organic loan portfolio are
allocated specific allowances. Therefore, impaired loans in our organic
portfolio that are reported without a specific allowance are reported as such
due to collateral or cash flow sufficiency, as applicable. Large groups of
smaller balance homogenous loans such as consumer secured loans, residential
mortgage loans and consumer unsecured loans are collectively evaluated for
potential loss. All other loans are evaluated for impairment on an individual
basis. Acquisition, development and construction loans that have interest-only
or interest reserve structures are reviewed at least quarterly and are reported
as nonperforming or impaired loans prior to their maturity date if doubt exists
as to the collectability of contractual principal or interest prior to that
time. Evidence of impairment on such loans could include construction cost
overruns, deterioration of guarantor strength and slowdown in sales
activity.
The
FDIC-assisted acquisitions have increased the complexity in reporting
nonperforming loans and the allowance for loan and lease losses. For example,
purchased credit impaired loans are not included in the tables of impaired loans
within this report unless we have recorded additional specific reserves on those
loans subsequent to their acquisition. Loans in the Company’s organic portfolio
have general and specific reserves allocated when management has determined it
is probable a loss has been incurred. Loans in the Community First Bank
portfolio were recorded and are currently accounted for under the business
combination rules of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141 and
Accounting Standards Codification Topic (“ASC”) 310-30. Loans in the Community
First Bank portfolio that were not credit impaired on the date of purchase are
allocated a general loss reserve. Loans that were credit impaired in
the Community First Bank portfolio on the date of acquisition are reported at
the present value of expected cash flows. No allowance for loan losses is
reported on these loans as
impairments
in excess of the acquisition-date fair value discount result in a partial
charge-off of the loan’s remaining unpaid principal balance.
The loans
purchased in the LibertyBank Acquisition are accounted for under the business
combination rules of ASC 805, which requires all loans acquired in the
LibertyBank portfolio to be reported initially at estimated fair value.
Accordingly, an allowance for loan losses is not carried over or recorded as of
the date of the LibertyBank Acquisition. The Company elected to apply the
accounting methodology of ASC 310-30 to all loans purchased in the LibertyBank
Acquisition. As such, all acquired loans have been aggregated into pools and the
portion of the fair value discount not related to credit impairment is accreted
over the life of the loan into interest income. A pool is accounted for as a
single asset with a single interest rate, cumulative loss rate and cash flow
expectation; therefore, loans purchased in the LibertyBank Acquisition are not
individually identified as nonperforming loans. Loans purchased in the CFB
Acquisition were not pooled; therefore, loans that are on nonaccrual status, or
are 90 days past due and still accruing are reported as nonperforming
loans.
In
situations where loans purchased in the LibertyBank Acquisition had similar risk
characteristics, loans were aggregated into pools to estimate cash flows under
ASC 310-30. The Company aggregated all of the loans acquired in the LibertyBank
Acquisition into 22 different pools based on common risk characteristics
including collateral and borrower credit ratings. The cash flows expected over
the life of the pools are estimated using an internal cash flow model that
projects cash flows and calculates the carrying values of the pools, book
yields, effective interest income and impairment, if any, based on pool level
events. Assumptions as to cumulative loss rates, loss curves and prepayment
speeds are utilized to calculate the expected cash flows.
Our
determination of the initial fair value of loans purchased in the FDIC-assisted
acquisitions involved a high degree of judgment and complexity. The carrying
value of the acquired loans reflects management’s best estimate of the amount to
be realized from the acquired loan and lease portfolios. However, the
amounts we actually realize on these loans could differ materially from the
carrying value reflected in these financial statements, based upon the timing of
collections on the acquired loans in future periods, underlying collateral
values and the ability of borrowers to continue to make payments.
Because
of the loss sharing agreement with the FDIC on these assets and related FDIC
indemnification receivable asset, we do not expect that we will incur excessive
losses on the acquired loans, based on our current estimates. The indemnified
portion of partial charge-offs and provisions for general loan loss reserves in
the acquired portfolios is recorded in noninterest income and results in an
increase in the FDIC indemnification asset. Under the loss sharing agreements
with the FDIC in the CFB Acquisition, our share of the first $34.0 million of
losses and reimbursable expenses on the covered assets (defined as loans, leases
and other real estate owned) is 20%. Any loss on covered assets in excess of the
$34.0 million tranche is limited to 5%. Under the loss sharing agreements in the
LibertyBank Acquisition, our share of all losses and reimbursable expenses on
covered assets is 20%.
Troubled Debt Restructurings.
According to generally accepted accounting principles, we are required to
account for certain loan modifications or restructurings as a "troubled debt
restructuring." In general, the modification or restructuring of a
debt is considered a troubled debt restructuring if we, for economic or legal
reasons related to a borrower's financial difficulties, grant a concession to
the borrower that we would not otherwise consider.
The
internal process used to assess whether a modification should be reported and
accounted for as a troubled debt restructuring includes an assessment of the
borrower's payment history, considering whether the borrower is in financial
difficulty, whether a concession has been granted, and whether it is likely the
borrower will be able to perform under the modified terms. Rate reductions below
market rate, extensions of the loan maturity date that would not otherwise be
considered, and deferrals or forgiveness of principal or interest are examples
of modifications that are concessions.
Troubled
debt restructurings totaled $10.1 million and $4.7 million at September 30, 2010
and September 30, 2009, respectively, with noncovered loans representing $5.4
million and $4.7 million of those amounts, respectively. Modifications to loans
not accounted for as troubled debt restructurings totaled $9.9 million at
September 30, 2010. Approximately $5.5 million of those modifications resided in
the noncovered loan portfolio. These loans were not considered to be troubled
debt restructurings because the borrower was not under financial difficulty at
the time of the modification or extension. Extensions are made at market rates
as evidenced by comparison to newly originated loans of generally comparable
credit quality and structure.
Classified Assets. Federal
regulations provide for the classification of lower quality loans and other
assets, such as debt and equity securities, as substandard, doubtful or loss. An
asset is considered substandard if it is inadequately protected by the current
net worth, liquidity and paying capacity of the borrower or any collateral
pledged. Substandard assets include those characterized by the distinct
possibility that we will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not
corrected. Assets classified as doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in
those classified substandard with the added characteristic that the weaknesses
present make collection or liquidation in full highly questionable and
improbable on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions and values.
Assets classified as loss are those considered uncollectible and of such little
value that their continuance as assets without the establishment of a specific
loss reserve is not warranted.
When we
classify problem assets as either substandard or doubtful, we may establish a
specific allowance in an amount we deem prudent. Specific allowance amounts are
approved by Senior Management and reviewed by the Bank’s Classified Asset
Committee to address the risk specifically or we may allow the loss to be
addressed in the general allowance. The doubtful category is generally a
short-term interim step prior to charge off. Members of the Classified Asset
Committee include the Bank’s Chief Credit Officer and Commercial Banking Team
Leaders, as well as the Bank’s internal loan review director and other members
of management in our Credit Administration department. General allowances
represent loss allowances which have been established to recognize the inherent
risk associated with lending activities, but which, unlike specific allowances,
have not been specifically allocated to particular problem assets. When an
insured institution classifies problem assets as a loss, it is required to
charge off such assets in the period in which they are deemed uncollectible.
Assets that do not currently expose us to sufficient risk to warrant
classification in one of the aforementioned categories but possess weaknesses
are required to be designated as special mention. Our determination as to the
classification of our assets and the amount of our valuation allowances is
subject to review by the OTS, which can order the establishment of additional
loss allowances.
In
connection with the filing of periodic reports with the OTS and in accordance
with our classification of assets policy, we regularly review the problem assets
in our portfolio to determine whether any assets require classification in
accordance with applicable regulations. On the basis of our review of our loans,
as of September 30, 2010, we had classified loans of $107.7 million, net of
purchase accounting adjustments, with $38.0 million in the noncovered loan
portfolio. The total amount of noncovered classified assets represented 18.51%
of total stockholders’ equity and 2.56% of total assets as of September 30,
2010. The aggregate amounts of classified assets at the dates indicated were as
follows:
|
|
September
30, 2010
|
|
|
September
30, 2009
|
|
|
|
Covered
|
|
|
Noncovered
|
|
|
Covered
|
|
|
Noncovered
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
Classified
assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Doubtful
|
|
$ |
-- |
|
|
$ |
-- |
|
|
$ |
-- |
|
|
$ |
43 |
|
Substandard
|
|
|
69,751 |
|
|
|
37,966 |
|
|
|
22,030 |
|
|
|
27,515 |
|
Total
|
|
$ |
69,751 |
|
|
$ |
37,966 |
|
|
$ |
49,588 |
|
|
$ |
27,558 |
|
Potential Problem Loans.
Potential problem loans are loans that do not yet meet the criteria for
placement on non-accrual status, but known information about possible credit
problems of the borrowers causes management to have doubts as to the ability of
the borrowers to comply with present loan repayment terms. This may result in
the future inclusion of such loans in the non-accrual loan category. As of
September 30, 2010, the aggregate amount of potential problem loans was $49.9
million, which includes loans that were rated “Substandard” under the Bank’s
risk grading process that are included in the classified loan table above but
were not on non-accrual status. Noncovered loans included in that amount was
$28.9 million at September 30, 2010. The $28.9 million balance of noncovered
potential problem loans includes $22.5 million in loans secured by commercial
real estate, $3.2 million real estate construction and land development loans,
and $1.7 million of loans secured by one-to-four family residential real
estate.
Real Estate Owned and Other
Repossessed Assets. Real estate we acquire as a result of foreclosure or
by deed-in-lieu of foreclosure is classified as real estate owned until it is
sold. When the property is acquired, it is recorded at the lower of its cost,
which is the unpaid principal balance of the related loan plus foreclosure
costs, or the fair market value of the property less selling costs. Other
repossessed collateral, including autos, are also recorded at the lower of cost
(i.e., the unpaid principal balance plus repossession costs) or fair market
value. As of September 30,
2010, we
had $30.5 million in real estate owned and other repossessed assets with $20.5
million, after fair value purchase adjustments, subject to the loss share
agreement with the FDIC.
Nonperforming Assets.
Nonperforming assets include nonaccrual loans, loans delinquent 90 days
or more and still accruing, real estate acquired through foreclosure,
repossessed assets and loans that are not delinquent but exhibit weaknesses that
have evidenced doubt as to our ability to collect all contractual principal and
interest and have been classified as impaired under ASC Topic 310-10-35. When a
loan becomes 90 days delinquent, we typically place the loan on nonaccrual
status. However, as noted earlier, loans purchased in the LibertyBank
Acquisition were pooled and a pool is accounted for as a single asset with a
single interest rate, cumulative loss rate and cash flow expectation; therefore,
loans purchased in the LibertyBank Acquisition are not individually identified
as nonperforming loans. Loans purchased in the CFB Acquisition were not pooled;
therefore, loans that are on nonaccrual status, or are 90 days past due and
still accruing are reported as nonperforming loans.
The
following table bifurcates our nonperforming assets as of September 30, 2010 and
2009:
|
|
September 30,
2010
|
|
|
September 30,
2009
|
|
|
|
Covered
Assets(1)
|
|
|
Noncovered
Assets
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Covered
Assets(1)
|
|
|
Noncovered
Assets
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
Real
estate construction
|
|
$ |
8,430 |
|
|
$ |
399 |
|
|
$ |
8,829 |
|
|
$ |
7,466 |
|
|
$ |
2,906 |
|
|
$ |
10,372 |
|
Commercial
and multi-family
residential real estate
|
|
|
15,584 |
|
|
|
3,307 |
|
|
|
18,891 |
|
|
|
11,016 |
|
|
|
2,725 |
|
|
|
13,741 |
|
One-to-four
family residential
|
|
|
359 |
|
|
|
4,028 |
|
|
|
4,388 |
|
|
|
5,020 |
|
|
|
6,100 |
|
|
|
11,120 |
|
Other
|
|
|
950 |
|
|
|
1,965 |
|
|
|
2,915 |
|
|
|
3,206 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
3,259 |
|
Total nonperforming
loans
|
|
|
25,323 |
|
|
|
9,699 |
|
|
|
35,023 |
|
|
|
26,708 |
|
|
|
11,784 |
|
|
|
38,492 |
|
Real
estate owned and other
repossessed assets
|
|
|
20,513 |
|
|
|
9,968 |
|
|
|
30,481 |
|
|
|
7,516 |
|
|
|
10,875 |
|
|
|
18,391 |
|
Total
nonperforming assets
|
|
$ |
45,836 |
|
|
$ |
19,667 |
|
|
$ |
65,504 |
|
|
$ |
34,224 |
|
|
$ |
22,659 |
|
|
$ |
56,883 |
|
________________________
(1)
|
Covered
assets include loans purchased in the CFB Acquisition and all covered REO
and repossessed assets, including those purchased in the LibertyBank
Acquisition. Loans acquired in the LibertyBank Acquisition have been
pooled and are not separately reported as nonperforming
loans.
|
The
following table sets forth information with respect to our nonperforming assets
and troubled debt restructurings within the meaning of ASC 310-10-35 for the
periods indicated.
|
|
At
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(dollars
in thousands)
|
|
Loans
accounted for on a non-accrual basis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real
estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-to-four
family residential
|
|
$ |
4,328 |
|
|
$ |
10,617 |
|
|
$ |
1,518 |
|
|
$ |
588 |
|
|
$ |
358 |
|
Multi-family
residential
|
|
|
3,052 |
|
|
|
1,753 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
Commercial
|
|
|
15,839 |
|
|
|
10,750 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
407 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
Total
real estate
|
|
|
23,219 |
|
|
|
23,120 |
|
|
|
1,618 |
|
|
|
995 |
|
|
|
358 |
|
Real
estate construction
|
|
|
8,829 |
|
|
|
11,611 |
|
|
|
7,991 |
|
|
|
436 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
Consumer
|
|
|
1,371 |
|
|
|
544 |
|
|
|
316 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
Commercial
business
|
|
|
1,260 |
|
|
|
3,217 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
Total
loans
|
|
|
34,679 |
|
|
|
38,492 |
|
|
|
9,945 |
|
|
|
1,531 |
|
|
|
388 |
|
Accruing
loans which are contractually past due 90
days
or more
|
|
|
344 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
Total
of nonaccrual and 90 days past due loans
|
|
|
35,023 |
|
|
|
38,492 |
|
|
|
9,945 |
|
|
|
1,531 |
|
|
|
388 |
|
Repossessed
assets
|
|
|
382 |
|
|
|
412 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
Real
estate owned
|
|
|
30,099 |
|
|
|
17,979 |
|
|
|
650 |
|
|
|
549 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
Total
nonperforming assets
|
|
$ |
65,504 |
|
|
$ |
56,883 |
|
|
$ |
10,595 |
|
|
$ |
2,080 |
|
|
$ |
388 |
|
Nonperforming
covered assets included above
|
|
$ |
45,836 |
|
|
$ |
34,224 |
|
|
|