10-Q
Table of Contents

 
 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
     
þ   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007
or
     
o   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from                      to                     
Commission file number 1-9860
BARR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
     
Delaware   42-1612474
     
(State or Other Jurisdiction of   (I.R.S. — Employer
Incorporation or Organization)   Identification No.)
400 Chestnut Ridge Road, Woodcliff Lake, New Jersey 07677-7668
(Address of principal executive offices)
201-930-3300
(Registrant’s telephone number)
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer” and “large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer þ           Accelerated filer o           Non-accelerated filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o      No þ
As of October 26, 2007 the registrant had 107,750,550 shares of $0.01 par value common stock outstanding.
 
 

 


 

BARR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
INDEX TO FORM 10-Q
             
        Page  
        Number  
Part I          
   
 
       
Item 1.          
   
 
       
        3  
   
 
       
        4  
   
 
       
        5  
   
 
       
        6  
   
 
       
Item 2.       24  
   
 
       
Item 3.       35  
   
 
       
Item 4.       35  
   
 
       
Part II          
   
 
       
Item 1.       37  
Item 1A.       37  
Item 6.       37  
   
 
       
        38  
 EX-31.1: CERTIFICATION
 EX-31.2: CERTIFICATION
 EX-32.O: CERTIFICATIONS

2


Table of Contents

Part I. CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Barr Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands, except share amounts)
(unaudited)
                 
    September 30,     December 31,  
    2007     2006  
Assets
               
Current assets:
               
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 212,329     $ 231,975  
Marketable securities
    269,659       673,746  
Accounts receivable, net of reserves of $268,175 and $236,577, respectively
    473,261       511,136  
Other receivables, net
    69,215       67,461  
Inventories
    501,045       426,272  
Deferred income taxes
    79,076       82,597  
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
    30,225       35,926  
Current assets held for sale
    46,407       58,886  
 
           
Total current assets
    1,681,217       2,087,999  
 
               
Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $360,699 and $196,709, respectively
    1,078,026       1,004,418  
Deferred income taxes
    38,183       37,872  
Marketable securities
    20,905       8,946  
Other intangible assets, net
    1,487,151       1,471,493  
Goodwill
    276,301       276,449  
Long-term assets held for sale
    15,050       10,945  
Other assets
    73,149       63,740  
 
           
Total assets
  $ 4,669,982     $ 4,961,862  
 
           
 
               
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
               
Current liabilities:
               
Accounts payable
  $ 139,593     $ 137,362  
Accrued liabilities
    258,753       271,407  
Current portion of long-term debt and capital lease obligations
    344,969       742,192  
Income taxes payable
    9,116       21,359  
Deferred tax liabilities
    855       8,266  
Current liabilities held for sale
    10,834       31,307  
 
           
Total current liabilities
    764,120       1,211,893  
 
               
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations
    1,804,795       1,935,477  
Deferred tax liabilities
    209,422       221,259  
Long-term liabilities held for sale
    2,288       2,580  
Other liabilities
    100,598       84,327  
 
               
Commitments & Contingencies (Note 15)
               
 
               
Minority interest
    36,283       41,098  
 
               
Shareholders’ equity:
               
Preferred stock, $1 par value per share; authorized 2,000,000; none issued
           
Common stock, $.01 par value per share; authorized 200,000,000; issued 110,481,923 and 109,536,481, respectively
    1,105       1,095  
Additional paid-in capital
    665,821       610,232  
Retained earnings
    973,833       877,991  
Accumulated other comprehensive income
    212,407       76,600  
Treasury stock at cost: 2,972,997 shares
    (100,690 )     (100,690 )
 
           
Total shareholders’ equity
    1,752,476       1,465,228  
 
           
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
  $ 4,669,982     $ 4,961,862  
 
           
SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

3


Table of Contents

Barr Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
(unaudited)
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
    September 30,     September 30,  
    2007     2006     2007     2006  
 
                       
Revenues:
                               
Product sales
  $ 558,868     $ 300,881     $ 1,705,773     $ 914,021  
Alliance and development revenue
    31,996       31,489       93,540       96,858  
Other revenue
    10,521             32,576        
 
                       
Total revenues
    601,385       332,370       1,831,889       1,010,879  
 
                               
Costs and expenses:
                               
Cost of sales
    267,331       89,578       844,664       295,413  
Selling, general and administrative
    190,332       88,695       557,185       271,155  
Research and development
    60,361       39,969       186,804       114,121  
Write-off of in-process research and development
    243             4,601        
 
                       
Earnings from operations
    83,118       114,128       238,635       330,190  
 
                               
Interest income
    8,462       6,782       27,201       16,729  
Interest expense
    38,914       1,090       122,481       1,546  
Other income (expense), net
    6,487       (42,865 )     11,677       (25,104 )
 
                       
Earnings before income taxes and minority interest
    59,153       76,955       155,032       320,269  
 
                               
Income tax expense
    14,451       24,194       49,696       109,158  
Minority interest
    249             (1,662 )      
 
                       
Net earnings from continuing operations
    44,951       52,761       103,674       211,111  
 
                               
Discontinued operations
                               
Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes
    (5,990 )           (7,796 )      
Loss on disposal of discontinued operations, net of taxes
    (36 )           (36 )      
 
                       
Net loss from discontinued operations, net of tax
    (6,026 )           (7,832 )      
 
                       
Net earnings
  $ 38,925     $ 52,761     $ 95,842     $ 211,111  
 
                       
 
                               
Basic:
                               
Earnings per common share — continuing operations
  $ 0.42     $ 0.50     $ 0.97     $ 1.99  
Loss per common share — discontinued operations
    (0.05 )           (0.07 )      
 
                       
Net earnings per common share — basic
  $ 0.37     $ 0.50     $ 0.90     $ 1.99  
 
                       
 
                               
Diluted:
                               
Earnings per common share — continuing operations
  $ 0.41     $ 0.49     $ 0.95     $ 1.95  
Loss per common share — discontinued operations
    (0.05 )           (0.07 )      
 
                       
Net earnings per common share — diluted
  $ 0.36     $ 0.49     $ 0.88     $ 1.95  
 
                       
 
                               
Weighted average shares — basic
    107,298       106,311       107,008       106,089  
 
                       
 
                               
Weighted average shares — diluted
    108,852       108,061       108,584       108,187  
 
                       
SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

4


Table of Contents

Barr Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
                 
    Nine Months Ended  
    September 30,  
    2007     2006  
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
               
Net earnings
  $ 95,842     $ 211,111  
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities:
               
Depreciation and amortization
    221,404       53,531  
Deferred revenue
    (5,037 )     (2,223 )
Minority interest
    1,510        
Stock-based compensation expense
    23,379       20,322  
Deferred income tax benefit
    (49,129 )     (12,723 )
Loss on derivative instruments, net
    8,591       32,089  
Write-off of acquired in-process research and development
    4,601        
Other
    (641 )     (8,736 )
Changes in assets and liabilities:
               
(Increase) decrease in:
               
Accounts receivable and other receivables, net
    65,644       43,729  
Inventories
    (41,927 )     (6,686 )
Prepaid expenses
    8,990       (7,426 )
Other assets
    (1,899 )     (7,173 )
Increase (decrease) in:
               
Accounts payable, accrued liabilities and other liabilities
    (66,825 )     71,389  
Income taxes payable
    (7,238 )     40,822  
 
           
Net cash provided by operating activities
    257,265       428,026  
 
           
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
               
Purchases of property, plant and equipment
    (80,235 )     (36,297 )
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment
    811       109  
Purchases of marketable securities
    (1,634,643 )     (2,481,570 )
Sales of marketable securities
    2,032,365       2,409,399  
Purchases of derivative instruments
          (48,900 )
Settlement of derivative instruments
    (2,586 )     1,517  
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired
    (86,822 )     (63,302 )
Investment in debt securities
    (2,041 )      
Investment in venture funds and other
    (482 )     (3,627 )
 
           
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
    226,367       (222,671 )
 
           
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
               
Principal payments on long-term debt and capital leases
    (616,830 )     (1,115 )
Proceeds from long-term debt and capital leases
    70,890        
Tax benefit of stock incentives
    8,245       12,748  
Proceeds from exercise of stock options and employee stock purchases
    26,581       26,256  
Other
    871        
 
           
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
    (510,243 )     37,889  
 
           
Effect of exchange-rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
    6,965        
 
           
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
    (19,646 )     243,244  
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
    231,975       30,010  
 
           
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
  $ 212,329     $ 273,254  
 
           
SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

5


Table of Contents

BARR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except for share and per share amounts)
(unaudited)
1. Basis of Presentation
     Barr Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Barr” or the “Company”) is a Delaware holding company whose principal subsidiaries are Barr Laboratories, Inc., Duramed Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Duramed”) and PLIVA d.d. (“PLIVA”). The accompanying unaudited interim financial statements included in this Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of Barr Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and its subsidiaries and the accompanying notes that are included in the Company’s Transition Report on Form 10-K/T (the “Transition Report”) for the six-month period ended December 31, 2006 (the “Transition Period”). The Company prepared these condensed consolidated financial statements following the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission and generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”) for interim reporting. In management’s opinion, the unaudited financial statements reflect all adjustments (including those that are normal and recurring) that are necessary in the judgment of management for a fair presentation of such statements in conformity with GAAP.
     The consolidated financial statements include all companies which Barr directly or indirectly controls (meaning it has more than 50% of the voting rights in those companies). Investments in companies where Barr holds between 20% and 50% of a company’s voting rights are accounted for by using the equity method, with Barr recording its proportionate share of that company’s net income and shareholders’ equity. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its majority-owned subsidiaries, after elimination of inter-company accounts and transactions.  Non-controlling interests in the Company’s subsidiaries are recorded, net of tax, as minority interest.
     In preparing financial statements in conformity with GAAP, the Company must make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses and related disclosures at the date of the financial statements and during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. All information, data and figures provided in this report for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 relate solely to Barr’s financial results and do not include PLIVA’s results.
     Certain amounts in the Company’s prior-period financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the presentation for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007. Such amounts include the Company’s reclassification of amortization expense from selling, general and administrative expense to cost of sales. See Note 9 below.
2. Recent Accounting Pronouncements
     In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value under GAAP and expands disclosure about fair value measurements. The statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that adopting this statement will have on its consolidated financial statements.
     In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, providing companies with an option to report selected financial assets and liabilities at fair value. The objective of SFAS 159 is to reduce both complexity in accounting for financial instruments and the volatility in earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently. GAAP has required different measurement attributes for different assets and liabilities that can create artificial volatility in earnings. SFAS 159 helps to mitigate this type of accounting-induced volatility by enabling companies to report related assets and liabilities at fair value, which would likely reduce the need for companies to comply with detailed rules for hedge accounting. SFAS 159 also establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between companies that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. SFAS 159 requires companies to provide additional information that will help investors and other users of financial statements to more

6


Table of Contents

easily understand the effect of a company’s choice to use fair value on its earnings. It also requires entities to display the fair value of those assets and liabilities for which a company has chosen to use fair value on the face of the balance sheet. SFAS 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that adopting this statement will have on its consolidated financial statements.
     In June 2007, the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) reached a consensus on EITF Issue No. 07-3, Accounting for Advance Payments for Goods or Services to be Received for Use in Future Research and Development Activities. EITF 07-3 provides clarification surrounding the accounting for nonrefundable research and development advance payments, whereby such payments should be recorded as an asset when the advance payment is made and recognized as an expense when the research and development activities are performed. EITF 07-3 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2007. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that adopting this EITF will have on its consolidated financial statements.
3. Earnings Per Share
     The following is a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators used to calculate earnings per common share (“EPS”) as presented in the condensed consolidated statements of operations:
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
    September 30,     September 30,  
    2007     2006     2007     2006  
(table in thousands, except per share data)                                
Numerator for basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share
                               
Net earnings from continuing operations
  $ 44,951     $ 52,761     $ 103,674     $ 211,111  
Net loss from discontinued operations
    (6,026 )           (7,832 )      
 
                       
Net earnings
  $ 38,925     $ 52,761     $ 95,842     $ 211,111  
 
                       
 
                               
Denominator: Weighted average shares — basic
    107,298       106,311       107,008       106,089  
 
                               
Earnings per common share — continuing operations
  $ 0.42     $ 0.50     $ 0.97     $ 1.99  
Loss per common share — discontinued operations
    (0.05 )           (0.07 )      
 
                       
Earnings per common share — basic
  $ 0.37     $ 0.50     $ 0.90     $ 1.99  
 
                       
 
                               
Denominator: Weighted average shares — diluted
    108,852       108,061       108,584       108,187  
 
                               
Earnings per common share — continuing operations
  $ 0.41     $ 0.49     $ 0.95     $ 1.95  
Loss per common share — discontinued operations
    (0.05 )           (0.07 )      
 
                       
Earnings per common share — diluted
  $ 0.36     $ 0.49     $ 0.88     $ 1.95  
 
                       
 
                               
Calculation of weighted average common shares — diluted
                               
 
                               
Weighted average shares — basic
    107,298       106,311       107,008       106,089  
Effect of dilutive options
    1,554       1,750       1,576       2,098  
 
                       
Weighted average shares — diluted
    108,852       108,061       108,584       108,187  
 
                       
 
                               
Not included in the calculation of diluted earnings per-share because their impact is antidilutive:
                               
Stock options outstanding
    928       146       1,912       58  

7


Table of Contents

4. Acquisitions and Business Combinations
PLIVA d.d.
     On October 24, 2006, the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, Barr Laboratories Europe B.V. (“Barr Europe”), completed the acquisition of PLIVA, headquartered in Zagreb, Croatia. Under the terms of the cash tender offer, Barr Europe made a payment of $2,377,773 based on an offer price of HRK 820 (Croatian Kuna (“HRK”)) per share for all shares tendered during the offer period. The transaction closed with 96.4% of PLIVA’s total outstanding share capital being tendered to Barr Europe (17,056,977 of 17,697,419 outstanding shares at the date of the acquisition). Subsequent to the close of the cash tender offer, Barr Europe purchased an additional 390,809 shares on the Croatian stock market for $58,309, including 53,128 shares totaling $8,432 purchased during the three months ended September 30, 2007 and 240,856 shares totaling $36,372 during the nine months ended September 30, 2007. As the acquisition was structured as a purchase of equity, the amortization of purchase price assigned to assets in excess of PLIVA’s historic tax basis will not be deductible for income tax purposes. With the addition of the treasury shares held by PLIVA, Barr Europe owned or controlled 98.12% of PLIVA’s voting share capital as of September 30, 2007 (17,447,786 of 17,781,524 outstanding shares).
     The purchase price of $36,372 for the 240,856 shares acquired during the nine months ended September 30, 2007 has been allocated to the estimated fair values using the same valuation methodology as employed with shares acquired on October 24, 2006. The fair values attributed to in-process research and development (“IPR&D”) that was expensed during the three months ended September 30, 2007 was $243, and such amount was $4,601 for the nine months ended September 30, 2007. The share purchases in the nine months ended September 30, 2007 resulted in an increase in goodwill of $6,880.
     By October 24, 2007, the Company had finalized the valuation and completed the purchase price allocation for the PLIVA acquisition.
     Refer to Note 9 below for the factors impacting the PLIVA goodwill adjustments.
O.R.C.A.pharm GmbH
     On September 5, 2007, the Company acquired 100% of the outstanding shares of O.R.C.A.pharm GmbH (“ORCA”), a privately owned specialty pharmaceutical company focused on the oncology market in Germany. In accordance with SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations”, the Company used the purchase method to account for this transaction. Under the purchase method of accounting, the assets acquired and liabilities assumed from ORCA are recorded at the date of acquisition, at their respective fair values. The purchase price was $38,060 and includes cash paid of $28,568, accrued amounts of $2,993 for a working capital adjustment and minimum future payments of $6,176 due in 2008 and 2009, and $323 of transaction fees. The Company may also be required to pay up to an additional $11,509 based on the achievement of defined performance milestones for 2007 and 2008. The operating results of ORCA are included in the consolidated financial statements subsequent to the September 5, 2007 acquisition date. As part of the preliminary purchase price allocation the Company has assigned fair values as follows:
         
Inventory
  $ 3,442  
Products acquired
    29,327  
Goodwill
    3,514  
Other assets
    5,880  
Liabilities
    (4,103 )
 
     
Total
  $ 38,060  
 
     

     The above purchase price allocation is preliminary and is based on the information that was available as of the acquisition date to estimate the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Management believes the available information provides a reasonable basis for allocating the purchase price but the Company is awaiting additional information necessary to finalize the purchase price allocation. The Company expects to finalize the valuation and complete the purchase price allocation as soon as possible but no later than one year from the acquisition date. Under the guidance of SFAS 141, this acquisition is being treated as an immaterial acquisition. As an immaterial acquisition, pro forma financial statements are not required to be presented.

8


Table of Contents

5. Discontinued Operations
     Since its acquisition of PLIVA on October 24, 2006, the Company has been evaluating PLIVA’s operations and has decided to divest or exit certain non-core operations including its operations in Spain and Italy, and its animal health and veterinary business operated by Veterina d.d. (“Veterina”). As a result, as of September 30, 2007, the assets and liabilities relating to Spain and Veterina met the “held for sale” criteria of FAS 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long Lived Assets.
     On September 28, 2007, the Company sold 100% of the outstanding shares in Pliva Pharma, S.p.A., its Italian subsidiary, for $4,001. This resulted in a loss on the sale of $36.
     In connection with the planned divestiture of Veterina, the Company announced on October 5, 2007 that its PLIVA subsidiary had sold 100% of the ordinary shares in Veterina through a public offering in Croatia. The Veterina business has been segregated from continuing operations and is included in assets held for sale and discontinued operations, net of taxes. See Note 17 below for further details.
     The Company’s operations in Spain and Italy are part of the generic pharmaceuticals segment. The Company’s Veterina business is a separate operating segment which does not meet the quantitative thresholds for separate disclosure and, as such, is included in “other” in Note 16 below.
     The following combined amounts of the Company’s operations in Spain and Italy and the Veterina business have been segregated from continuing operations and included in discontinued operations, net of taxes, and loss on sale of discontinued operations in the condensed consolidated statement of operations, as shown below:
                                                                 
    Three Months Ended             Nine Months Ended        
    September 30, 2007             September 30, 2007        
    Italy     Spain     Veterina     Total     Italy     Spain     Veterina     Total  
Revenues
                                                               
Generics
  $ 2,478     $ 4,190     $     $ 6,668     $ 8,302     $ 18,620     $     $ 26,922  
Other
                7,386       7,386                   23,826       23,826  
         
Total net revenues of discontinued operations
  $ 2,478     $ 4,190     $ 7,386     $ 14,054     $ 8,302     $ 18,620     $ 23,826     $ 50,748  
         
 
                                                               
Loss before income taxes and minority interest
  $ (518 )   $ (2,777 )   $ (2,843 )   $ (6,138 )   $ (1,427 )   $ (4,001 )   $ (2,285 )   $ (7,713 )
Loss on sale of discontinued operations
    (36 )                   (36 )     (36 )                 (36 )
Income tax benefit (expense)
                148       148                   (83 )     (83 )
Minority interest
                                               
         
Loss from discontinued operations-net of tax
  $ (554 )   $ (2,777 )   $ (2,695 )   $ (6,026 )   $ (1,463 )   $ (4,001 )   $ (2,368 )   $ (7,832 )
         
     The following combined amounts of assets and liabilities related to the Spain and Veterina businesses have been segregated and included in assets held for sale and liabilities held for sale on the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006. Assets and liabilities relating to the Italian operations were divested prior to September 30, 2007, however such assets and liabilities are included in assets held for sale at December 31, 2006 in the combined table below:

9


Table of Contents

                 
    September 30,     December 31,  
    2007     2006  
Accounts receivable, net
  $ 24,743     $ 21,929  
Inventories
    19,618       26,139  
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
    2,046       10,818  
 
           
Current assets held for sale
    46,407       58,886  
 
           
 
               
Property, plant and equipment, net
    11,368       5,781  
Deferred income taxes
    1,267       2,378  
Other intangible assets, net
    2,297       2,677  
Other assets
    118       109  
 
           
Long-term assets held for sale
    15,050       10,945  
 
           
 
               
Assets held for sale
  $ 61,457     $ 69,831  
 
           
 
               
Accounts payable
  $ 7,065     $ 18,761  
Accrued liabilities
    3,480       12,293  
Current portion of long-term debt and capital lease obligations
    289       253  
 
           
Current liabilities held for sale
    10,834       31,307  
 
           
 
               
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations
    1,711       1,738  
Deferred tax liabilities
    457       636  
Other liabilities
    120       206  
 
           
Long-term liabilities held for sale
    2,288       2,580  
 
           
 
               
Liabilities held for sale
  $ 13,122     $ 33,887  
 
           
6. Investments in Marketable Securities
     Investments in Marketable Securities and Debt
     Trading Securities
     The fair value of marketable securities classified as trading at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 was $3,581 and $3,718, respectively, which is included as a component of current marketable securities. Net gains (losses) for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2007 and for the six-month period ended December 31, 2006 were $999 and $(572), respectively. These amounts are included as a component of other income. Of such amount, losses in the amount of $16 are unrealized and relate to securities still held at September 30, 2007.
     Available-for-Sale Securities
     Available-for-sale equity securities include amounts invested in connection with the Company’s excess 401(k) and other deferred compensation plans of $11,259 and $10,293 at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively.
     Available-for-sale debt securities at September 30, 2007 include $243,442 in commercial paper and market auction debt securities and $30,370 in municipal and corporate bonds and federal agency issues. The commercial paper and market auction debt securities are readily convertible into cash at par value with interest rate reset or underlying maturity dates ranging from October 1, 2007 to December 11, 2008. The municipal and corporate bonds and federal agency issues have maturity dates ranging from October 15, 2007 to February 1, 2010.
     Available-for-sale debt securities at December 31, 2006 included $617,286 in commercial paper and market auction debt securities and $50,419 in municipal and corporate bonds and federal agency issues. The commercial paper and market auction debt securities were readily convertible into cash at par value with interest rate reset or

10


Table of Contents

underlying maturity dates that ranged from January 1, 2007 to February 11, 2008. The municipal and corporate bonds and federal agency issues had maturity dates that ranged from January 1, 2007 to April 1, 2009.
     The unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale investments at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 were $875 and $(466), respectively.
7. Derivative Instruments
     Interest Rate Risk
     The Company’s interest-bearing investments, loans and borrowings are subject to interest rate risk. The Company invests and borrows primarily on a variable-rate basis. Depending upon market conditions, the Company may fix the interest rate it either pays or receives by entering into fixed-rate investments and borrowings or through the use of derivative financial instruments.
     During 2007, as reflected in the table below, the Company entered into pay-fixed, receive-floating interest rate swap agreements effectively converting $800,000 of variable-rate debt under unsecured senior credit facilities to fixed-rate debt. The objective of the hedge is to manage the variability of cash flows in the interest payments related to the portion of the variable-rate debt designated as being hedged. With the hedge in place, the sole source of variability to the Company is the interest payments it receives based on changes in LIBOR. The swaps are accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 133, as amended.
     Derivative financial instruments are measured at fair value and are recognized as assets or liabilities on the balance sheet, with changes in the fair value of the derivatives recognized in either net income (loss) or other comprehensive income (loss), depending on the timing and designated purpose of the derivative. When the Company pays interest on the portion of the debt designated as hedged, the gain or loss on the swap designated as hedging the interest payment will be reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income into interest expense.
     These derivative instruments are designated as cash flow hedges with the related gains or losses recorded in other comprehensive income (net of tax) with an offsetting amount included in other non-current liabilities. The losses are $4,540 and $0 for the three months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and $4,975 and $0 for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
     The terms of the interest rate swap agreements that are still in effect as of September 30, 2007 are shown in the following table:
                                         
Notional                    
Principal Amount       Start Date   Maturity Date   Receive Variable Rate   Pay Fixed Rate
$ 175,000    
 
  March-30-07   Jun-30-08   90 day LIBOR     5.253 %
$ 125,000    
 
  Jun-30-07   Jun-30-10   90 day LIBOR     5.4735 %
$ 100,000    
 
  Jun-30-07   Jun-30-10   90 day LIBOR     5.3225 %
$ 100,000    
 
  Sept-30-07   Sept-30-10   90 day LIBOR     4.985 %
$ 100,000    
 
  Sept-30-07   Sept-30-09   90 day LIBOR     4.92875 %
$ 100,000    
 
  Sept-30-07   Mar-31-09   90 day LIBOR     4.755 %
$ 100,000    
 
  Sept-30-07   Sept-30-09   90 day LIBOR     4.83 %
     During the nine-month period ended September 30, 2007, the Company unwound a treasury lock on a ten-year U.S. Treasury security used to lock-in the current benchmark interest rate. The treasury lock was previously designated as a cash flow hedge of the Company’s forecasted floating rate interest payments on an anticipated transaction. As of June 30, 2007, this hedging relationship no longer qualified for hedge accounting. Consequently, the unwinding of this treasury lock resulted in a $3,515 net gain reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income and recorded in other income in the three months ended June 30, 2007.

11


Table of Contents

     Foreign Exchange Risk
     The Company seeks to manage potential foreign exchange risk from foreign subsidiaries by matching each such subsidiary’s revenues and costs in its functional currency. Similarly, the Company seeks to manage the foreign exchange risk relating to assets and liabilities of its foreign subsidiaries by matching the assets and liabilities in the subsidiary’s functional currency. When this is not practical, the Company uses foreign exchange forward contracts or options to manage its foreign exchange risk, as described below.
     The Company entered into foreign exchange forward contracts that serve as economic hedges of certain forecasted foreign currency transactions occurring at various dates through 2007. At September 30, 2007, none of the Company’s remaining foreign exchange derivatives were eligible for hedge accounting, resulting in their changes in fair value being reported in other (expense) income. The gains or losses realized on these instruments at maturity are intended to offset the losses or gains of the transactions they are hedging.
     The table below summarizes the respective fair values of the derivative instruments described above at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006:
                                 
    September 30, 2007     December 31, 2006  
    Balance Sheet     Balance Sheet  
    Assets     Liabilities     Assets     Liabilities  
Interest rate swap
  $ 20     $ (7,997 )   $ 1,267     $ (443 )
Forward rate agreements
    245       (85 )     997       (163 )
Foreign exchange forward contracts
    820       (4,932 )     383       (106 )
 
                       
Total
  $ 1,085     $ (13,014 )   $ 2,647     $ (712 )
 
                       
8. Inventories
     Inventories consist of the following:
                 
    September 30,     December 31,  
    2007     2006  
Raw materials and supplies
  $ 177,749     $ 160,345  
Work-in-process
    99,895       67,798  
Finished goods
    223,401       198,129  
 
           
Total inventories
  $ 501,045     $ 426,272  
 
           
9. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
     Goodwill at December 31, 2006 and September 30, 2007 was as follows:
                         
    Generic     Proprietary        
    Pharmaceuticals     Pharmaceuticals     Total  
Goodwill balance at December 31, 2006
  $ 228,529     $ 47,920     $ 276,449  
 
                       
Additional acquisition of PLIVA shares
    6,880             6,880  
PLIVA goodwill adjustments
    (27,648 )           (27,648 )
Currency translation effect
    16,959             16,959  
Goodwill on acquisition of ORCA
    3,661             3,661  
 
                 
Goodwill balance at September 30, 2007
  $ 228,381     $ 47,920     $ 276,301  
 
                 

12


Table of Contents

     PLIVA goodwill adjustments for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 include the following purchase price allocation and valuation revisions made based on additional information available to modify the Company’s initial estimates for certain assets and liabilities.
         
Current assets (excluding cash)
  $ (6,686 )
Property, plant & equipment
    (40,122 )
Other non-current assets
    291  
Current liabilities(1)
    4,812  
Deferred tax liabilities
    6,320  
Other liabilities
    7,737  
 
     
Total PLIVA goodwill adjustments
  $ (27,648 )
 
     
(1) The initial PLIVA opening balance sheet reflected an accrued liability of $1,500 relating to a potential obligation owing by PLIVA to certain former employees in connection with their allegations of invention rights relating to the process for manufacturing Azithromycin. Upon a Croatian court’s entry of a judgment in favor of the former employees in June 2007, the Company allocated an additional $12,500 as an accrued liability relating to this matter. PLIVA is appealing the decision, and believes it has strong grounds for full or partial reversal on appeal. PLIVA’s obligation to pay any amount to the former employees will not arise unless and until the decision in favor of the former employees is affirmed on appeal.
     Intangible assets at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 consist of the following:
                                                 
            September 30,                     December 31,          
    2007     2006  
    Gross             Net     Gross             Net  
    Carrying     Accumulated     Carrying     Carrying     Accumulated     Carrying  
    Amount     Amortization     Amount     Amount     Amortization     Amount  
Finite-lived intangible assets:
                                               
Product licenses
  $ 45,350     $ 18,876     $ 26,474     $ 45,350     $ 15,624     $ 29,726  
Product rights
    1,429,606       179,163       1,250,443       1,301,939       64,788       1,237,151  
Land use rights
    97,341       1,105       96,236       88,053       166       87,887  
Other
    28,829       470       28,359       38,626       94       38,532  
         
 
Total amortized finite-lived intangible assets
    1,601,126       199,614       1,401,512       1,473,968       80,672       1,393,296  
         
 
Indefinite-lived intangible assets — tradenames:
    85,639             85,639       78,197             78,197  
         
Total identifiable intangible assets
  $ 1,686,765     $ 199,614     $ 1,487,151     $ 1,552,165     $ 80,672     $ 1,471,493  
         
     The Company’s product licenses, product rights, land use rights and other finite lived intangible assets have weighted average useful lives of approximately 10, 17, 99 and 10 years, respectively. Amortization expense associated with these acquired intangibles was $40,213 and $7,894 for the three months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and $120,262 and $25,406 for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. During the Transition Period (six months ended December 31, 2006), the Company revised the presentation of amortization expense to include this item within cost of sales instead of selling, general and administrative expense. The presentation for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 was reclassified to conform to that of the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007.
     The Company reviews the carrying value of its long-lived assets for impairment annually and whenever events and circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable from the estimated future cash flows expected to result from its use and eventual disposition. In cases where undiscounted expected future cash flows are less than the carrying value, an impairment loss is recognized equal to an amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value of assets. Fair value is defined as the market price. If the market price is not available, fair value is estimated based on the present value of future cash flows. Such evaluation took place as of July 1, 2007 with no impairment deemed required.
     The annual estimated amortization expense for the next five calendar years on finite-lived intangible assets is as follows:

13


Table of Contents

         
       Years Ending December 31,
2008
    $ 168,084
2009
    $ 154,639
2010
    $ 146,238
2011
    $ 136,047
2012
    $ 126,892
     Included in the finite-lived intangible assets table above are product rights to over 200 intangible assets acquired by the Company over the past five years. The following table disaggregates the values of these product rights into therapeutic categories as of September 30, 2007:
                                 
    September 30, 2007  
                            Weighted  
    Gross             Net     Average  
    Carrying     Accumulated     Carrying     Amortization  
Product Rights by Therapeutic Category   Amount     Amortization     Amount     Period  
     
Contraception
  $ 383,412     $ 56,098     $ 327,314       18  
Antibiotics, antiviral & anti-infectives
    227,375       30,864       196,511       10  
Cardiovascular
    211,704       26,950       184,754       10  
Psychotherapeutics
    159,818       17,398       142,420       12  
Other (1)
    447,297       47,853       399,444       10  
             
Total product rights
  $ 1,429,606     $ 179,163     $ 1,250,443          
             
 
(1)   Other includes numerous therapeutic categories, none of which exceeds 10% of the aggregate net book value of product rights.
10. Debt
          A summary of outstanding debt is as follows:
                 
    September 30,     December 31,  
    2007     2006  
Credit facilities (a)
  $ 1,850,000     $ 2,415,703  
Note due to WCC shareholders (b)
    6,500       6,500  
Obligation under capital leases (c)
    2,176       2,819  
Fixed rate bonds (d)
    109,130       101,780  
Dual-currency syndicated credit facility (e)
    65,065       86,287  
Euro commercial paper program (f)
    47,856       26,334  
Dual-currency term loan facility (g)
    25,000       25,000  
Multi-currency revolving credit facility (h)
    42,176       13,167  
Other
    1,861       79  
 
           
 
    2,149,764       2,677,669  
 
               
Less: current installments of debt and capital lease obligations
    344,969       742,192  
 
           
Total long-term debt
  $ 1,804,795     $ 1,935,477  
 
           
 
(a)   In connection with the closing of the PLIVA acquisition, on October 24, 2006, the Company entered into unsecured senior credit facilities (the “Credit Facilities”) and drew $2,000,000 under a five-year term facility and $415,703 under a 364-day term facility, both of which bear interest at variable rates of LIBOR plus 75 basis points (6.11% at September 30, 2007). The Company is obligated to repay the outstanding principal amount of the five-year term facility in 18 consecutive quarterly installments of $50,000, with the first payment having been made

14


Table of Contents

 
on March 30, 2007, with the balance of $1,100,000 due at maturity in October 2011. The five-year term facility had an outstanding principal balance of $1,850,000 at September 30, 2007. The 364-day term facility was due to mature in October 2007, however the Company repaid it in full on September 28, 2007, using cash on hand. The Credit Facilities include customary covenants, including financial covenants limiting the total indebtedness of the Company on a consolidated basis.
(b)   In February 2004, the Company acquired all of the outstanding shares of Women’s Capital Corporation (“WCC”). In connection with that acquisition, the Company issued a four-year, $6,500 promissory note to WCC’s former shareholders. The note bears a fixed interest rate of 2%. The entire principal amount and all accrued interest is due on February 25, 2008.
 
(c)   The Company has certain capital lease obligations for machinery, equipment and buildings in the United States and the Czech Republic.
The Company’s debt includes the following liabilities incurred by PLIVA. Debt incurred prior to the acquisition on October 24, 2006 was recorded at fair value based on the prevailing market prices on the acquisition date, pursuant to the provisions of SFAS No. 141 (Euro to U.S. dollar equivalents are based on the exchange rate in effect at September 30, 2007):
(d)   In May 2004, PLIVA issued Euro denominated fixed rate bonds with a face value of EUR 75,000 ($106,308). The bonds mature in 2011 and bear interest at 5.75%, payable semiannually. At the time of the PLIVA acquisition, the aggregate fair value of the bonds was EUR 77,475 ($109,816). The premium over face value of EUR 2,475 ($3,509) is being amortized over the remaining life of the bonds. The amortization for the nine month period ended September 30, 2007 was EUR 484 ($687). The facility includes customary covenants.
 
(e)   On October 28, 2004, PLIVA entered into a dual-currency syndicated term loan facility pursuant to which the lenders agreed to provide the borrowers up to $250,000, available to be drawn in either US dollars or Euros. The facility has a five-year term and bears interest at a variable rate based on LIBOR or Euribor plus 70 basis points. At September 30, 2007, there was $44,855 outstanding with an effective interest rate of 6.0469% and EUR 14,258 ($20,210) outstanding with an effective interest rate of 4.817%. The facility includes customary covenants. On October 29, 2007, PLIVA repaid $25,095 and EUR 11,348 ($16,085) on this loan facility.
 
(f)   In December 1998, PLIVA initiated, and in June 2003 updated, a commercial paper program that provides for an aggregate amount of Euro denominated financing not to exceed EUR 250,000 ($354,375) and bears interest at a variable interest rate. As of September 30, 2007, there was EUR 33,823 ($47,856) outstanding at an effective interest rate of 5.51%. Subsequently on October 5, 2007, EUR 20,000 ($28,350) has been drawn under this program, with such amount due to be repaid on December 19, 2007.
 
(g)   On September 9, 2006, PLIVA entered into a dual currency term loan facility pursuant to which the lender agreed to provide the borrowers up to $25,000, available to be drawn in either US dollars or Euros at a variable rate based on LIBOR or Euribor plus a negotiated margin. On September 7, 2007, the facility was amended and extended for an additional two-year term. At September 30, 2007, there was $25,000 outstanding with an effective interest rate of 5.72% plus a negotiated margin. The facility includes customary covenants.
 
(h)   In June 2005, PLIVA entered into a EUR 30,000 multi-currency revolving credit facility ($42,176). The facility matures on December 31, 2007 and bears interest at a variable rate based on LIBOR, Euribor or another relevant reference rate plus a negotiated margin. At September 30, 2007, there was EUR 30,000 ($42,176) outstanding with an effective interest rate of 4.36% plus a negotiated margin. The facility includes customary covenants.

15


Table of Contents

             Principal maturities of existing long-term debt and amounts due on capital leases for the periods set forth in the table below are as follows:
         
Twelve Months Ending September 30,   Total  
2009
  $ 237,847  
2010
  $ 206,269  
2011
  $ 256,634  
2012
  $ 1,100,343  
2013
  $ 367  
Thereafter
  $ 513  
 
     
Total principal maturities and amounts due on long-term debt and capital obligations
  $ 1,801,973  
Premium on fixed rate bond (see (d) above)
  $ 2,822  
 
     
Total long-term debt and capital lease obligations
  $ 1,804,795  
 
     
11. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
                                 
    Three months ended     Nine months ended  
    September 30,     September 30,     September 30,     September 30,  
    2007     2006     2007     2006  
Net income
  $ 38,925     $ 52,761     $ 95,842     $ 211,111  
Net unrealized gain on marketable securities, net of tax
    404       206       1,187       484  
Net (loss) on derivative financial instruments designated as cash flow hedges, net of tax
    (4,540 )           (4,975 )      
Net unrealized gain on currency translation adjustments
    92,629             139,595        
 
                               
 
                       
Total comprehensive income
  $ 127,418     $ 52,967     $ 231,649     $ 211,595  
 
                       
     Accumulated other comprehensive income, as reflected on the balance sheet, is comprised of the following:
                 
    September 30,     December 31,  
    2007     2006  
Cumulative unrealized gain (loss) on marketable securities, net of tax
  $ 915     $ (272 )
Cumulative net (loss) on derivative financial instruments designated as cash flow hedges, net of tax
    (4,975 )      
Cumulative net unrealized gain on pension and other post employment benefits, net of tax
    22       22  
Cumulative net unrealized gain on currency translation adjustments
    216,445       76,850  
 
           
Accumulated other comprehensive income
  $ 212,407     $ 76,600  
 
           
12. Income Taxes
     In June 2006, the FASB issued FIN No. 48 (“FIN 48”), Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes— an interpretation of FASB Statement 109. FIN 48 establishes a single model to address accounting for uncertain tax positions. On January 1, 2007, the Company adopted FIN 48, and as a result, recorded a $4,500 increase in the net liability for unrecognized tax positions, which was entirely recorded as a $4,500 adjustment to the opening balance of goodwill relating to the PLIVA acquisition. The total amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits as of January 1, 2007 was $25,000, and did not change materially as of September 30,

16


Table of Contents

2007. Included in the balance at September 30, 2007 was $13,200 of tax positions that, if recognized, would affect the Company’s effective tax rate. The Company does not believe that the amount of the liability for unrecognized tax benefits will materially change during the next 52-week period.
     Upon adoption of FIN 48, the Company elected an accounting policy to classify accrued interest and related penalties relating to unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense. Previously, the Company’s policy was to classify interest and penalties in its income tax provision. The Company had $2,600 accrued for interest and penalties at September 30, 2007.
     The Company is currently being audited by the IRS for its June 30 and December 31, 2006 tax years. Prior periods have either been audited or are no longer subject to an IRS audit. Audits in several state jurisdictions are currently underway for tax years 2004 to 2006. The foreign jurisdictions with significant operations currently being audited are Croatia for 2004 and 2005 (tax years that remain subject to examination are 2003 and 2006), Czech Republic for 2003 to 2005 (tax year that remains subject to examination is 2006) and Hungary for 2005 and 2006 (tax years that remain subject to examination are 2002-2005). Additionally, although Germany and Poland are not currently being audited, the tax years that remain subject to examination in Germany are 2004-2006 and in Poland 2001-2002 and 2004-2006.
     During the three months ended September 30, 2007, the German government enacted new tax legislation reducing the statutory corporate tax rate from 39% to 30%, effective January 1, 2008. The change reduced the Company’s deferred tax liability and income tax provision by approximately $9,600 during the quarter.
13. Stock-based Compensation
     The Company adopted SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123(R)), effective July 1, 2005. SFAS 123(R) requires the recognition of the fair value of stock-based compensation in net earnings. The Company has three stock-based employee compensation plans, two stock-based non-employee director compensation plans and an employee stock purchase plan. Stock-based compensation consists of stock options and stock-settled stock appreciation rights (“SSARs”) granted under the employee equity compensation plans, and shares purchased under the employee stock purchase plan. Stock options and SSARs are granted to employees at exercise prices equal to the fair market value of the Company’s stock at the dates of grant. Generally, stock options and SSARs granted to employees fully vest three years from the grant date and have a term of 10 years. Stock options granted to directors are generally exercisable on the date of the first annual shareholders’ meeting immediately following the date of grant. The Company recognizes stock-based compensation expense over the requisite service period of the individual grants, which generally equals the vesting period.
     The Company utilized the modified prospective transition method for adopting SFAS 123(R). Under this method, the provisions of SFAS 123(R) apply to all awards granted or modified after the date of adoption. In addition, the unrecognized expense of awards not yet vested at the date of adoption, determined under the original provisions of SFAS No. 123, is recognized in net earnings in the periods after the date of adoption.
     The Company recognized stock-based compensation expense for the three months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 of $7,947 and $7,124, respectively, and for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 of $23,379 and $20,322, respectively. The Company also recorded related tax benefits for the three months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 of $2,771 and $2,125, respectively, and for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 of $7,874 and $6,061, respectively. The effect on net income from recognizing stock-based compensation for the three months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 was $5,176 and $4,999, or $0.05 per basic and $0.05 per diluted share, respectively, and for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 was $15,505 and $14,261, or $0.14 and $0.13 per basic and $0.14 and $0.13 per diluted share, respectively.
     The total number of shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options and SSARs granted during the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 was 1,439,950 and 1,691,100 respectively, with weighted-average exercise prices of $51.10 and $49.65, respectively.
     For all of the Company’s stock-based compensation plans, the fair value of each grant was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Black-Scholes utilizes assumptions related to volatility, the risk-free interest rate, the dividend yield (which is assumed to be zero, as the Company has not paid any cash dividends) and option holder exercise behavior. Expected volatilities utilized in the model are based mainly on the historical volatility of the Company’s stock price and other factors. The risk-free interest rate is derived from the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect in the period of grant. The model incorporates exercise and post-vesting

17


Table of Contents

forfeiture assumptions based on an analysis of historical data. The average expected term is derived from historical and other factors. The stock-based compensation for the awards issued in the respective periods was determined using the following assumptions and calculated average fair values:
                                 
    Three   Nine
    Months Ended   Months Ended
    September 30,   September 30,
    2007   2006   2007   2006
Average expected term (years)
    4       5       4       5  
Weighted average risk-free interest rate
    5.00 %     5.10 %     4.64 %     5.06 %
Dividend yield
    0 %     0 %     0 %     0 %
Volatility
    29.20 %     32.18 %     29.81 %     32.41 %
Weighted average grant date fair value
  $ 17.03     $ 18.27     $ 15.71     $ 18.65  
     As of September 30, 2007, the aggregate intrinsic value of awards outstanding and exercisable was $142,873 and $123,195, respectively. In addition, the aggregate intrinsic value of awards exercised during the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 was $26,723 and $35,978, respectively. The total remaining unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested awards amounted to $45,759 at September 30, 2007 and is expected to be recognized over the next three years. The weighted average remaining requisite service period of the unvested awards was 24 months.
14. Restructuring
     Management’s plans for the restructuring of the Company’s operations as a result of its acquisition of PLIVA are completed. As of September 30, 2007, certain elements of the plan have been recorded as a cost of the acquisition.
     Through September 30, 2007, the Company has recorded restructuring costs primarily associated with severance costs and the costs of vacating certain duplicative PLIVA facilities in the U.S. Certain of these costs were recognized as liabilities assumed in the acquisition. The components of the restructuring costs capitalized as a cost of the acquisition are as follows and are included in the generic pharmaceuticals segment:
                                 
    Balance                     Balance  
    as of                     as of  
    December 31,                     September 30,  
    2006     Payments     Additions     2007  
     
 
                               
Involuntary termination of PLIVA employees
  $ 8,277     $ 7,005     $ 328     $ 1,600  
Lease termination costs
    10,201       177             10,024  
     
 
  $ 18,478     $ 7,182     $ 328     $ 11,624  
     
     Lease termination costs represent costs incurred to exit duplicative activities of PLIVA. Severance includes accrued severance benefits and costs associated with change-in-control provisions of certain PLIVA employment contracts.
     In addition, in connection with its restructuring of PLIVA’s U.S. operations, the Company incurred $7,044 of severance and retention bonus expense in the nine months ended September 30, 2007.
15. Commitments and Contingencies
Litigation Matters
     The Company is involved in various legal proceedings incidental to its business, including product liability, intellectual property and other commercial litigation and antitrust actions. The Company records accruals for such contingencies to the extent that it concludes a loss is probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated. The

18


Table of Contents

Company also records accruals for litigation settlement offers made by the Company, whether or not the settlement offers have been accepted.
     The Company’s material litigation matters are summarized in its Transition Report on Form 10-K/T for the six month period ended December 31, 2006 and its Form 10-Qs for the quarters ended March 31, 2007 and June 30, 2007. Except for the matters summarized below, no material changes have occurred in the Company’s litigation matters since June 30, 2007.
     Fexofenadine Hydrochloride Suit
     On November 14, 2006, Sanofi-Aventis sued the Company and Teva in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, alleging that Teva’s fexofenadine hydrochloride tablets infringe a patent directed to a certain crystal form of fexofenadine hydrochloride, and that the Company induced Teva’s allegedly infringing sales. On November 21, 2006, Sanofi-Aventis filed an amended complaint in the same court, asserting that the Company’s fexofenadine hydrochloride tablets infringe a different patent directed to a different crystal form of fexofenadine hydrochloride. On January 12, 2007, the Company moved to dismiss the suit against Barr Pharmaceuticals, answered the complaint on behalf of Barr Laboratories, denied the allegations against it, and moved to transfer the action to the U.S. District Court for New Jersey. On September 27, 2007, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas granted the Company’s motion to transfer the case to the U.S. District Court for New Jersey and denied Barr Pharmaceutical, Inc.’s motion to dismiss as moot.
     Antitrust Matters
     Ciprofloxacin (Cipro®) Antitrust Class Actions
     The Company has been named as a co-defendant with Bayer Corporation, The Rugby Group, Inc. and others in approximately 38 class action complaints filed in state and federal courts by direct and indirect purchasers of Ciprofloxacin (Cipro) from 1997 to the present. The complaints allege that the 1997 Bayer-Barr patent litigation settlement agreement was anti-competitive and violated federal antitrust laws and/or state antitrust and consumer protection laws.
     On November 2, 2007, the Company and the other defendants in the federal litigation filed a motion with the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, asking the court to immediately transfer the case to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit or, in the alternative, to summarily affirm the district court’s judgment in favor of all defendants, based on the Second Circuit’s ruling in the Tamoxifen antitrust case.
     On September 19, 2003, the Circuit Court for the County of Milwaukee dismissed the Wisconsin state class action for failure to state a claim for relief under Wisconsin state law. The Court of Appeals reinstated the complaint on May 9, 2006 and the Wisconsin Supreme Court affirmed that decision on July 13, 2007, while not addressing the underlying merits of plaintiffs’ case. The matter has now returned to the trial court for further proceedings; no schedule or trial date has been set.
     On April 13, 2005, the Superior Court of San Diego, California ordered a stay of the California state class actions until after the resolution of any appeal in the MDL case. Plaintiffs have requested that the court lift the stay. A hearing on the matter is currently scheduled for November 8, 2007.
     Ovcon Antitrust Proceedings
     To date, the Company has been named as a co-defendant with Warner Chilcott Holdings, Co. III, Ltd. and others in complaints filed in federal courts by the Federal Trade Commission, 34 state Attorneys General and certain private class action plaintiffs claiming to be direct or indirect purchasers of Ovcon-35®. These actions, the first of which was filed by the FTC in December 2005, allege, among other things, that a March 24, 2004 agreement between the Company and Warner Chilcott (then known as Galen Holdings PLC) constitutes an unfair method of competition, is anticompetitive and restrains trade in the market for Ovcon-35® and its generic equivalents.
     During the quarter ended September 30, 2007, the Company and counsel for the FTC reached an agreement in principle, subject to FTC approval, to settle the FTC’s lawsuit against the Company. Under the proposed settlement, the FTC would dismiss its case against the Company, and the Company would agree to refrain from entering into

19


Table of Contents

exclusive supply agreements in certain non-patent challenge situations where the Company is an ANDA holder and the party being supplied is the NDA holder. On September 28, 2007, the Company and the FTC filed a joint motion with the district court seeking to stay the FTC’s case, pending FTC approval of the proposed settlement. On November 1, 2007, the FTC unanimously approved the proposed settlement. The Company anticipates that the proposed settlement will be finalized shortly, resulting in the dismissal of the FTC’s lawsuit against the Company.
     The court has ordered dispositive motions in the States’ case to be filed by November 14, 2007. The court has not yet set a trial date.
     In the actions brought on behalf of the direct purchasers, on October 22, 2007, the Court granted plaintiffs’ motion to certify a class on behalf of all entities that purchased Ovcon 35® directly from Warner Chilcott (or its affiliated companies) from April 22, 2004. Fact and expert discovery are now closed. The Court has ordered dispositive motions to be filed by November 14, 2007. No trial date has been set.
     In the actions brought on behalf of the indirect purchasers, the Company reached an agreement in principle with the class representatives to settle plaintiffs’ claims. On June 27 and 28, 2007, the court entered orders conditionally certifying a settlement class and preliminarily approving the parties’ settlement agreement. The court has scheduled a fairness hearing for November 6, 2007. This settlement is conditioned on the number of plaintiffs who exercise their right to opt-out of the settlement class not exceeding the threshold established by the terms of the settlement agreement.
     During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, the Company recorded charges in the amounts of $7,250 and $15,250 related to these and other settlement offers in the Ovcon litigation.
     Medicaid Reimbursement Cases
     The Company and numerous other pharmaceutical companies have been named as defendants in separate actions brought by the states of Alabama, Alaska, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Mississippi, South Carolina and Utah, the City of New York, and numerous counties in New York. In each of these matters, the plaintiffs seek to recover damages and other relief for alleged overcharges for prescription medications paid for or reimbursed by their respective Medicaid programs, with some states also pursuing similar allegations based on the reimbursement of drugs under Medicare Part B or the purchase of drugs by a state health plan (for example, South Carolina).
     In the Massachusetts case, the parties have reached a settlement under which the Company has denied any wrongdoing, and a stipulation of dismissal has been filed with the court.
     The State of Iowa case was filed in federal court in Iowa on October 9, 2007. The matter is at an early stage. No trial date has been set.
     The State of Utah case was filed in state court in Utah on September 21, 2007. The matter is at an early stage. No trial date has been set.
     Government Inquiries
     On October 3, 2006, the FTC notified the Company it was investigating a patent litigation settlement reached in matters pending in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York between the Company and Shire PLC concerning Shire’s Adderall XR product. On June 20, 2007, the Company received a Civil Investigative Demand seeking documents and data. The FTC is investigating whether the Company and the other parties to the litigation have engaged in unfair methods of competition in violation of the Federal Trade Commission Act by entering into agreements relating to Adderall XR and generic alternatives to Adderall XR, or other products for the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. The Company believes that its settlement agreement is in compliance with all applicable laws and intends to cooperate with the FTC in its investigation.
16. Segment Reporting
     The Company operates in two reportable business segments: generic pharmaceuticals and proprietary pharmaceuticals. The Company evaluates the performance of its operating segments based on net revenues and gross profit. The Company does not report depreciation expense, total assets or capital expenditures by segment as such information is neither used by management nor accounted for at the segment level. Net product sales and gross profit information for the Company’s operating segments consisted of the following:

20


Table of Contents

                                                                 
Three months ended   Generic           Proprietary                                   % of
September 30, 2007   Pharmaceuticals   %   Pharmaceuticals   %   Other   %   Consolidated   revenue
 
Revenues:
                                                               
Product sales
  $ 434,190       72 %   $ 124,678       21 %   $       %   $ 558,868       93 %
Alliance and development revenue
          %           %     31,996       5 %     31,996       5 %
Other revenue
          %           %     10,521       2 %     10,521       2 %
 
Total revenues
  $ 434,190       72 %   $ 124,678       21 %   $ 42,517       7 %   $ 601,385       100 %
 
 
                                                               
 
          Margin           Margin           Margin           Margin
Gross Profit:
          %           %           %           %
Product sales
  $ 202,989       47 %   $ 94,717       76 %   $       %   $ 297,706       53 %
Alliance and development revenue
          %           %     31,996       100 %     31,996       100 %
Other revenue
          %           %     4,352       41 %     4,352       41 %
 
Total gross profit
  $ 202,989       47 %   $ 94,717       76 %   $ 36,348       85 %   $ 334,054       56 %
 
                                                                 
Three months ended   Generic           Proprietary                                   % of
September 30, 2006   Pharmaceuticals   %   Pharmaceuticals   %   Other   %   Consolidated   revenue
 
Revenues:
                                                               
Product sales
  $ 197,595       60 %   $ 103,286       31 %   $       %   $ 300,881       91 %
Alliance and development revenue
          %           %     31,489       9 %     31,489       9 %
Other revenue
          %           %           %           %
 
Total revenues
  $ 197,595       60 %   $ 103,286       31 %   $ 31,489       9 %   $ 332,370       100 %
 
 
                                                               
 
          Margin           Margin           Margin       Margin
Gross Profit: (1)
          %           %           %           %
Product sales
  $ 132,047       67 %   $ 79,256       77 %   $       %   $ 211,303       70 %
Alliance and development revenue
          %           %     31,489       100 %     31,489       100 %
Other revenue
          %           %           %           %
 
Total gross profit
  $ 132,047       67 %   $ 79,256       77 %   $ 31,489       100 %   $ 242,792       73 %
 

21


Table of Contents

                                                                 
Nine months ended   Generic           Proprietary                                   % of
September 30, 2007   Pharmaceuticals   %   Pharmaceuticals   %   Other   %   Consolidated   revenue
 
Revenues:
                                                               
Product sales
  $ 1,389,781       76 %   $ 315,992       17 %   $     %   $ 1,705,773       93 %
Alliance and development revenue
          %           %     93,540       5 %     93,540       5 %
Other revenue
          %           %     32,576       2 %     32,576       2 %
 
Total revenues
  $ 1,389,781       76 %   $ 315,992       17 %   $ 126,116       7 %   $ 1,831,889       100 %
 
 
                                                               
 
          Margin           Margin           Margin           Margin
Gross Profit:
          %           %           %           %
Product sales
  $ 647,261       47 %   $ 231,767       73 %   $       %   $ 879,028       52 %
Alliance and development revenue
          %           %     93,540       100 %     93,540       100 %
Other revenue
          %           %     14,657       45 %     14,657       45 %
 
Total gross profit
  $ 647,261       47 %   $ 231,767       73 %   $ 108,197       86 %   $ 987,225       54 %
 
                                                                 
Nine months ended   Generic           Proprietary                                   % of
September 30, 2006   Pharmaceuticals   %   Pharmaceuticals   %   Other   %   Consolidated   revenue
 
Revenues:
                                                               
Product sales
  $ 620,153       61 %   $ 293,868       29 %    $     %   $ 914,021       90 %
Alliance and development revenue
          %           %     96,858       10 %     96,858       10 %
Other revenue
          %           %           %           %
 
Total revenues
  $ 620,153       61 %   $ 293,868       29 %   $ 96,858       10 %   $ 1,010,879       100 %
 
 
                                                               
 
          Margin           Margin           Margin           Margin
Gross Profit: (1)
          %           %           %           %
Product sales
  $ 406,873       66 %   $ 211,735       72 %   $       %   $ 618,608       68 %
Alliance and development revenue
          %           %     96,858       100 %     96,858       100 %
Other revenue
          %           %           %           %
 
Total gross profit
  $ 406,873       66 %     211,735       72 %   $ 96,858       100 %     715,466       71 %
 
     
(1)   Prior period amounts have been reclassified to include the effect of intangible amortization and to conform to the presentation for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007.
     Geographic Information
     The Company’s principal operations are in the United States and Europe. Sales in the United States and the rest of the world (“ROW”) are classified based on the geographic location of the customers. The table below presents net product sales by geographic area based upon geographic location of the customer.
Product sales by geographic area
                                 
    Three     Nine  
    Months Ended     Months Ended  
    September 30,     September 30,  
    2007     2006     2007     2006  
United States
  $ 399,816     $ 299,365     $ 1,189,366     $ 909,595  
ROW
    159,052       1,516       516,407       4,426  
 
                       
Total product sales
  $ 558,868     $ 300,881     $ 1,705,773     $ 914,021  
 
                       
     The Company operates in more than 30 countries outside the United States. No single foreign country contributes more than 10% to consolidated product sales.

22


Table of Contents

Product sales by therapeutic category
     The Company’s generic and proprietary pharmaceutical segment net product sales are represented in the following therapeutic categories for the following periods:
                                 
    Three     Nine  
    Months Ended     Months Ended  
    September 30,     September 30,  
    2007     2006     2007     2006  
         
Contraception
  $ 188,192     $ 198,933     $ 530,668     $ 532,300  
Psychotherapeutics
    62,190       11,905       201,141       51,135  
Cardiovascular
    63,240       18,800       204,391       74,008  
Antibiotics, antiviral & anti-infectives
    51,074       11,957       168,905       42,913  
Other (1)
    194,172       59,286       600,668       213,665  
         
Total
  $ 558,868     $ 300,881     $ 1,705,773     $ 914,021  
         
 
(1)   Other includes numerous therapeutic categories, none of which individually exceeds 10% of consolidated product sales.
17. Subsequent events
     In connection with the planned divestiture of its non-core animal health business (“Veterina”), in October 2007 the Company’s PLIVA subsidiary sold 100% of the ordinary shares in Veterina through a public offering in Croatia for approximately $35,900.

23


Table of Contents

     Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
     The following discussion and analysis addresses material changes in the results of operations and financial condition of Barr Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and subsidiaries for the periods presented. This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements, the related notes to consolidated financial statements and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition included in the Company’s Transition Report on Form 10-K/T for the six-month period ended December 31, 2006 (the “Transition Report”), and the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes included in Item 1 of this report on Form 10-Q.
Business Development Activities
     PLIVA Acquisition
     On October 24, 2006, the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, Barr Laboratories Europe B.V. (“Barr Europe”), completed the acquisition of PLIVA, headquartered in Zagreb, Croatia. Under the terms of the cash tender offer, Barr Europe made a payment of approximately $2.4 billion based on an offer price of HRK 820 (Croatian Kuna (“HRK”)) per share for all shares tendered during the offer period. The transaction closed with 96.4% of PLIVA’s total outstanding share capital being tendered to Barr Europe (17,056,977 of 17,697,419 outstanding shares at the date of the acquisition). Subsequent to the close of the cash tender offer, Barr Europe purchased an additional 390,809 shares on the Croatian stock market for $58.3 million, including 53,128 shares purchased for $8.4 million during the three months ended September 30, 2007 and 240,856 shares purchased for $36.4 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2007. As the acquisition was structured as a purchase of equity, the amortization of purchase price assigned to assets in excess of PLIVA’s historic tax basis will not be deductible for income tax purposes. With the addition of the treasury shares held by PLIVA, Barr Europe owned or controlled 98.12% of PLIVA’s voting share capital as of September 30, 2007 (17,447,786 of 17,781,524 outstanding shares).
     O.R.C.A.pharm GmbH Acquisition
     On September 5, 2007 the Company acquired 100% of the outstanding shares of O.R.C.A.pharm GmbH (“ORCA”), a privately owned specialty pharmaceutical company focused on the oncology market in Germany. In accordance with SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations”, the Company used the purchase method to account for this transaction. Under the purchase method of accounting, the assets acquired and liabilities assumed from ORCA are recorded at the date of acquisition at their respective fair values. The purchase price was $38.0 million and the Company may also be required to pay up to an additional $11.5 million based on the achievement of defined performance milestones for 2007 and 2008.
     Pliva Pharma, S.p.A. Divestiture
     On September 28, 2007 our PLIVA subsidiary sold 100% of the outstanding shares in Pliva Pharma, S.p.A., its Italian subsidiary, for $3.8 million. This resulted in a loss on the sale of $0.04 million. For the nine months ended September 30, 2007, the results of operations for the Italian subsidiary have been segregated from continuing operations in our condensed consolidated statement of operations and are included in discontinued operations, net of taxes, along with the $0.04 million loss being recorded as a loss on the sale of the discontinued operations, net of taxes.
     Veterina d.d. IPO
     Subsequent to the end of the quarter, our PLIVA subsidiary sold Veterina, a non-core business unit, for approximately $35.9 million, in an offering of shares to the Croatian public. For the nine months ended September 30, 2007, the assets and liabilities associated with Veterina were classified as “held for sale” in accordance with FAS 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long Lived Assets. The results of operations for Veterina have been segregated from continuing operations and are included in discontinued operations, net of taxes.

24


Table of Contents

     The fluctuations in our operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, as compared to the same periods ended September 30, 2006, are primarily due to the acquisition of PLIVA. All information, data and figures provided in this report for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 relate solely to Barr’s financial results and do not include PLIVA.

25


Table of Contents

Results of Operations
Comparison of the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007 and September 30, 2006
     The following table sets forth revenue data for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 (dollars in millions):
                                                                 
    Three Months Ended September 30,     Nine Months Ended September 30,  
                    Change                     Change  
    2007     2006     $     %     2007     2006     $     %  
Generic products:
                                                               
Oral contraceptives
  $ 112.0     $ 121.4     $ (9.4 )     -8 %   $ 341.1     $ 329.6     $ 11.5       3 %
Other generics
    322.2       76.2       246.0       323 %     1,048.7       290.6       758.1       261 %
 
                                                 
Total generic products
    434.2       197.6       236.6       120 %     1,389.8       620.2       769.6       124 %
Proprietary products
    124.7       103.3       21.4       21 %     316.0       293.8       22.2       8 %
 
                                                 
Total product sales
    558.9       300.9       258.0       86 %     1,705.8       914.0       791.8       87 %
Alliance and development revenue
    32.0       31.5       0.5       2 %     93.5       96.9       (3.4 )     -4 %
Other revenue
    10.5             10.5       100 %     32.6             32.6       100 %
 
                                                 
Total revenues
  $ 601.4     $ 332.4     $ 269.0       81 %   $ 1,831.9     $ 1,010.9     $ 821.0       81 %
 
                                                 
     Product Sales
     Generic Oral Contraceptives
     During the three months ended September 30, 2007, sales of our generic oral contraceptives (“Generic OCs”) were $112.0 million, representing an 8% decrease from the prior year period. The decrease is primarily due to lower sales of Jolessa of $7.2 million and lower sales of certain other Generic OCs totaling approximately $10.7 million. These declines were partially offset by higher sales of Kariva of $4.6 million, due to higher prices, and contributions from Balziva of $3.9 million, which we launched subsequent to September 30, 2006.
     During the nine months ended September 30, 2007, sales of our Generic OCs were $341.1 million, representing a 3% increase over the prior year period. The increase was due to a full period of contribution from Balziva, which accounted for $8.4 million of the increase, combined with higher sales of Kariva of $13.4 million, due to both volume and price increases. These increases more than offset lower sales of Tri-Sprintec, which decreased by $10.9 million from the prior year period.
     Other Generic Products
     During the three months ended September 30, 2007, sales of our other generic products (“Other Generics”) were $322.2 million, up from $76.2 million in the prior year period, an increase of $246.0 million. This increase was mainly due to $214.1 million of sales attributable to PLIVA products, including sales of Azithromycin of $26.1 million. In addition to higher sales from acquired PLIVA products, the total sales increase included $18.7 million of higher sales of Fentanyl Citrate, our generic version of Cephalon’s ACTIQ that we launched in late September 2006.
     During the nine months ended September 30, 2007, sales of our Other Generics were $1,048.7 million, up from $290.6 million as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2006, an increase of $758.1 million. This increase was mainly due to $705.5 million of sales attributable to PLIVA products, including sales of Azithromycin of $84.3 million. In addition, we recorded $69.4 million in higher sales of Fentanyl Citrate during the nine months ended September 30, 2007. Partially offsetting these increases were lower sales of certain Other Generics, principally a $14.3 million decline in sales of Desmopressin due to lower volume and prices.
     Proprietary Products
     During the three months ended September 30, 2007, sales of our proprietary products were $124.7 million, an increase of $21.4 million as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2006. This increase was primarily

26


Table of Contents

due to $16.4 million of higher sales of Plan B, in part resulting from our over-the-counter (“OTC”) launch in November 2006. In addition, $9.2 million in sales of Adderall IR, which we acquired from Shire and launched in October 2006, and approximately $7.4 million of sales through our Odyssey subsidiary, which we acquired in the PLIVA transaction, contributed to this overall increase. These increases combined with other increases of our proprietary products more than offset lower sales of SEASONALE of $14.7 million due to the impact of generic competition. During the three months ended September 30, 2007, customer buying patterns may have contributed to our overall sales increase, and as such we expect that proprietary sales during our December 31, 2007 quarter will be lower than in the prior quarter.
     During the nine months ended September 30, 2007, sales of our proprietary products were $316.0 million, an increase of $22.2 million as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2006. Contributions from our launch of SEASONIQUE during this period, combined with the acquisition of Adderall IR and product sales recorded through our Odyssey subsidiary, contributed $59.7 million of total sales during the current period. In addition, we recorded higher sales of Plan B of $33.8 million compared to the same period in the prior year, including contributions from our Plan B OTC launch. These increases more than offset $46.2 million of lower sales of SEASONALE, lower sales of Mircette of $7.7 million representing a shift to Kariva, our generic version of the product, and lower sales of approximately $25.1 million of certain non-promoted proprietary products during the period.
     Alliance and Development Revenue
     During the three months ended September 30, 2007, we recorded $32.0 million of alliance and development revenue, up slightly from the $31.5 million in the prior year period. Revenues earned under our license and development agreement with Shire increased by $3.2 million and fees associated with the development of the Adenovirus vaccine for the U.S. Department of Defense increased by $1.3 million. Offsetting these increases were decreases of $2.0 million from our profit-sharing arrangement with Teva on generic Allegra and a decrease of $2.5 million in revenues relating to our agreements with Kos Pharmaceuticals (“Kos”) relating to Niaspan and Advicor.
     Alliance and development revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 was $93.5 million, down slightly from $96.9 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2006. This decrease of $3.4 million was caused principally by a $15.5 million decline in revenues from our profit-sharing arrangement with Teva on generic Allegra. As competition for generic Allegra continues to increase, we expect that revenues will decline in future periods. In addition, we recorded lower revenues relating to our agreements with Kos relating to Niaspan and Advicor of $5.0 million. These declines were partially offset by an increase of $10.1 million in development revenues earned under our license and development agreement with Shire and an increase in fees we receive for the development of the Adenovirus vaccine of $6.4 million.
     We expect that revenues under our agreements with Kos will be lower in the December 2007 quarter than in the current quarter due to the annual dollar limit applied to our royalties. While the annual limit increases each year during the term of our arrangement, the royalty rate and the Company’s promotion-related requirements declined in 2007 compared to 2006, which now remains fixed throughout the remaining term of the agreement.
     Other Revenue
     We recorded $10.5 million and $32.6 million of other revenue during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, respectively. This revenue is primarily attributable to non-core operations which include our diagnostics, disinfectants, dialysis and infusions business. This business was acquired through the PLIVA acquisition, and as such, there are no comparable operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006.

27


Table of Contents

     Cost of Sales
     The following table sets forth cost of sales data, in dollars, as well as the resulting gross margins expressed as a percentage of product sales (except “other”, which is expressed as a percentage of our other revenue line item), for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 (dollars in millions):
                                                                 
    Three Months Ended September 30,     Nine Months Ended September 30,  
                    Change                     Change  
    2007     2006     $     %     2007     2006     $     %  
Generic products
  $ 231.3     $ 65.6     $ 165.7       253 %   $ 742.5     $ 213.3     $ 529.2       248 %
 
                                                   
Gross margin
    46.7 %     66.8 %                     46.6 %     65.6 %                
 
Proprietary products
  $ 30.0     $ 24.0     $ 6.0       25 %   $ 84.3     $ 82.1     $ 2.2       3 %
 
                                                   
Gross margin
    75.9 %     76.8 %                     73.3 %     72.1 %                
 
Other revenue
  $ 6.1     $     $ 6.1       100 %   $ 17.9     $     $ 17.9       100 %
 
                                                   
Gross margin
    41.9 %     N/A                       45.1 %     N/A                  
 
Total cost of sales
  $ 267.4     $ 89.6     $ 177.8       198 %   $ 844.7     $ 295.4     $ 549.3       186 %
 
                                                   
Gross margin
    53.0 %     70.2 %                     51.4 %     67.7 %                
Cost of sales components include the following:
    our manufacturing and packaging costs for products we manufacture;
 
    amortization expense (as discussed further below);
 
    the write-off of the step-up in inventory arising from acquisitions, including PLIVA;
 
    profit-sharing or royalty payments we make to third parties, including raw material suppliers;
 
    the cost of products we purchase from third parties;
 
    lower of cost or market adjustments to our inventories; and
 
    stock-based compensation expense relating to employees within certain departments that we allocate to cost of sales.
     Prior to December 31, 2006, we included amortization expenses related to acquired product intangibles in selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) rather than cost of sales. As discussed in our Transition Report, we revised our presentation of amortization expense to include it within cost of sales rather than SG&A. We have adjusted our discussion regarding the quarter ended September 30, 2006 presented below to reflect this change.
     Overall: As a result of our increases in product sales of $258.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007 and $791.8 million for the nine months then ended, cost of sales more than doubled compared to the prior year periods. In addition to greater material and production costs associated with increased product sales, cost of sales increased due to higher amortization charges of $32.3 million and $94.9 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, respectively. Also included in cost of sales was a charge of $33.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 relating to the stepped-up value of inventory acquired from PLIVA that we sold primarily during the first quarter.
     In addition to amortization and inventory step-up charges, our product sales mix changed as compared to prior periods presented and negatively impacted our overall margins. Generic product sales during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 represented 78% and 81% of total product sales, respectively. For the same period in the prior year, generic product sales represented 66% and 68%, respectively. As a result of a higher proportion of generic product sales, which, as a group, carry lower gross margins than our proprietary line, and the charges noted above, overall gross margins, as a percentage of total product sales, decreased from 70.2% and 67.7% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 to 53.0% and 51.4% for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2007, respectively.

28


Table of Contents

     Generics: During the three months ended September 30, 2007, our generics segment cost of sales increased due in part to the $246.0 million increase in Other Generics sales, as described above, and $26.7 million of higher amortization expense arising primarily from product intangibles created as a result of the PLIVA acquisition. Gross margins declined from 66.8% in the prior period to 46.7% due to a higher proportion of Other Generics sales, which carry lower margins than Generic OCs, during the current period as compared to the same period in the prior year.
     During the nine months ended September 30, 2007, our generics segment cost of sales increased by $529.2 million as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2006 in large part due to the $758.1 million increase in Other Generics sales, for reasons described above, and $78.1 million of higher amortization expense. When combined with the charge related to the $33.2 million step-up in inventory described above, our generics margins declined from 65.6% in the prior period to 46.6%. This margin decrease was also negatively impacted by a higher proportion of Other Generic product sales, as a percentage of total generic product sales, during the current nine-month period as compared to the same period in the prior year.
     Proprietary: During the three months ended September 30, 2007, the cost of sales in our proprietary segment increased by $6.0 million over the three months ended September 30, 2006, resulting in a slightly lower margin of 75.9% compared to 76.8% for the prior year period. The increase in cost of sales is primarily attributable to a 21% increase in proprietary sales as compared to the same period in the prior year. The margin decline is a result of lower sales of higher margin products, including SEASONALE, which now faces generic competition, and SEASONIQUE, which included sales recorded at launch in the September 2006 quarter. Lower sales of these higher margin products were more than offset by higher sales of promoted and non-promoted products which, in general, have lower margins than SEASONIQUE and SEASONALE, resulting in an overall lower gross margin for the quarter.
     During the nine months ended September 30, 2007, the cost of sales in our proprietary segment increased by $2.2 million over the nine months ended September 30, 2006, due primarily to an increase in product sales of $22.2 million. Gross margins during the current nine-month period increased slightly to 73.3% from 72.1% in the prior year period, due primarily to a change in product sales mix. Sales of Plan B and SEASONIQUE, combined with sales of acquired products during the current period, including Adderall IR and proprietary products acquired from PLIVA, more than offset significantly lower sales of SEASONALE and other non-promoted, lower margin products.
Selling, General and Administrative Expense
     The following table sets forth selling, general and administrative expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 (dollars in millions):
                                                                 
    Three Months Ended September 30,     Nine Months Ended September 30,  
                    Change                     Change  
    2007     2006     $     %     2007     2006     $     %  
Selling, general and administrative
  $ 190.3     $ 88.7     $ 101.6       115 %   $ 557.2     $ 271.2     $ 286.0       105 %
 
                                                   
 
Charge included in general and administrative
  $ 7.3     $     $ 7.3       100 %   $ 15.3     $ 22.5     $ (7.2 )     -32 %
 
                                                   
     Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by $101.6 million in the three months ended September 30, 2007 as compared to the prior year period. Of this increase, approximately $77.8 million is directly attributable to our PLIVA subsidiary. In addition to the expenses attributable to PLIVA, there were (1) increased legal, accounting and other consulting fees of $8.8 million, (2) increased marketing expenses related to increased promotions of our proprietary products in the amount of $7.8 million, and (3) a litigation reserve of $7.3 million.
     Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by $286.0 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2007 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2006. Of this increase, approximately $239.3 million is directly attributable to PLIVA. In addition, there were (1) integration costs of $23.7 million from the PLIVA acquisition, (2) increased legal, accounting and other consulting fees of $13.5 million, and (3) a litigation reserve of $15.3 million during this period.

29


Table of Contents

     Selling, general and administrative expense in the nine months ended September 30, 2006 included a charge of $22.5 million in settlement of anti-trust litigation.
Research and Development
     The following table sets forth research and development expenses and the write-off of acquired in-process research and development (“IPR&D”) for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 (dollars in millions):
                                                                 
    Three Months Ended September 30,     Nine Months Ended September 30,  
                    Change                     Change  
    2007     2006     $     %     2007     2006     $     %  
Research and development
  $ 60.4     $ 40.0     $ 20.4       51 %   $ 186.8     $ 114.1     $ 72.7       64 %
 
                                                   
Write-off of acquired in-process research and development
  $ 0.2     $     $ 0.2       100 %   $ 4.6     $     $ 4.6       100 %
 
                                                   
     Research and development increased by $20.4 million in the three months ended September 30, 2007 as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2006. Of this 51% increase, approximately $19.2 million is directly attributable to our PLIVA subsidiary including salaries, third party research and development, and depreciation costs. The remaining increase is primarily due to a $1.5 million increase in development costs supporting our generic and proprietary development activities.
     Research and development increased by $72.7 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2007 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2006. Of this 64% increase, approximately $58.4 million is directly attributable to our PLIVA subsidiary, as discussed above. The remaining increase is primarily due to an $8.0 million increase in development costs supporting our generic and proprietary development activities.
     During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, we wrote-off acquired IPR&D of $0.2 million and $4.6 million, respectively.
Interest Income
     The following table sets forth interest income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 (dollars in millions):
                                                                 
    Three Months Ended September 30,     Nine Months Ended September 30,  
                    Change                     Change  
    2007     2006     $     %     2007     2006     $     %  
Interest income
  $ 8.5     $ 6.8     $ 1.7       25 %   $ 27.2     $ 16.7     $ 10.5       63 %
 
                                                   
     The increase in interest income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 is due to higher interest rates and higher average daily cash and marketable securities balances during these periods as compared to the prior year periods.
Interest Expense
     The following table sets forth interest expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 (dollars in millions):

30


Table of Contents

                                                                 
    Three Months Ended September 30,     Nine Months Ended September 30,  
                    Change                     Change  
    2007     2006     $     %     2007     2006     $     %  
Interest expense
  $ 38.9     $ 1.1     $ 37.8       N/M     $ 122.5     $ 1.5     $ 121.0       N/M  
 
                                                   
     The increase in interest expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 is due to the $2.6 billion of debt the Company incurred in connection with the PLIVA acquisition (both to finance the acquisition and debt carried from PLIVA). As a result of the incurrence of such debt, the Company estimates that interest expense will be approximately $156 million in 2007.
     Other Income (Expense)
     The following table sets forth other income (expense) for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 (dollars in millions):
                                                                 
    Three Months Ended September 30,     Nine Months Ended September 30,  
                    Change                     Change  
    2007     2006     $     %     2007     2006     $     %  
Other income (expense)
  $ 6.5       ($42.9 )   $ 49.4       115 %   $ 11.7       ($25.1 )   $ 36.8       147 %
 
                                                   
     Other income (expense) increased by $49.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007 as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2006. The increase was primarily a result of recording a $42.8 million reduction in the value of our foreign currency option related to the PLIVA acquisition during the three months ended September 30, 2006. This reduction in fair value reflected several factors including the changes in the exchange rate between the Dollar and the Euro. Additionally, in the three month period ended September 30, 2007 we recorded net gains of approximately $5.0 million related to foreign currency hedging activities, accounting for most of the remaining increase over the prior year period.
     Other income (expense) increased by $36.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2006. This too was primarily related to the reduction in value of the foreign currency option discussed above. Additionally, there was an increase of $6.1 million in our gains on foreign currency along with the Company unwinding a treasury lock on a ten-year U.S. Treasury security for a forecasted transaction.
Income Taxes
     The following table sets forth income tax expense and the resulting effective tax rate stated as a percentage of pre-tax income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 (dollars in millions):
                                                                 
    Three Months Ended September 30,     Nine Months Ended September 30,  
                    Change                     Change  
    2007     2006     $     %     2007     2006     $     %  
Income tax expense
  $ 14.5     $ 24.2     $ (9.7 )     -40 %   $ 49.7     $ 109.2     $ (59.5 )     -54 %
 
                                                   
Effective tax rate
    24.4 %     31.4 %                     32.1 %     34.1 %                
     The Company’s effective tax rate decreased in the current quarter to 24.4% from 31.4% in the same period of the prior year. During the three months ended September 30, 2007, the German government enacted new tax

31


Table of Contents

legislation reducing the statutory corporate tax rate from 39% to 30% effective January 1, 2008. The change reduced our deferred tax liability and income tax provision by approximately $9.6 million during the quarter.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Overview
     Our primary source of liquidity has been cash from operations, which entails the collection of accounts and other receivables related to product sales, and royalty and other payments we receive from third parties in various ventures, such as Teva with respect to generic Allegra and Kos Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a subsidiary of Abbott Laboratories, with respect to Niaspan and Advicor. Our primary uses of cash include repayment of our senior credit facilities, financing inventory, research and development programs, marketing and selling, capital projects and investing in business development activities.
Operating Activities
     Our operating cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 were $257.3 million compared to $428.0 million in the prior year period. The decrease in cash flows primarily reflects higher working capital in the current year caused primarily by higher inventories of $41.9 million and a significant reduction in accounts payable, accrued liabilities and other liabilities of $66.8 million.
Investing Activities
     Our net cash provided by investing activities was $226.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 compared to net cash used in investing activities of $222.7 million for the prior year period. The increase in net cash provided by investing activities was related to higher net sales of marketable securities in the current period of $397.7 million as compared to net purchases of marketable securities of $72.2 million during the prior year period and the reduction in purchases of derivative instruments of $48.9 million as compared to the prior year period. Offsetting this increase in net cash provided by investing activities over the prior year was higher capital spending of $46.1 million and the increase of $23.5 million in acquisitions over the prior year. Acquisitions during the current period include $36.4 million cost of acquiring additional PLIVA shares, $28.6 million cost associated with the purchase of ORCA, and $21.8 million of product acquisitions.
     Under Croatian law, our ownership of more than 95% of the voting shares in PLIVA permits us to undertake the necessary actions to acquire the remainder of PLIVA’s outstanding share capital. We are currently evaluating this option though we are not obligated to do so. In the meantime we may continue to purchase shares on the open market as deemed necessary.
Financing Activities
     Net cash used in financing activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2007 was $510.2 million compared to net cash provided by financing activities of $37.9 million in the prior year period. The increase in net cash used in financing activities in the current period primarily reflects debt repayments, including the $150.0 million principal payment on our $2.0 billion five-year term facility and our payment in full of our $415.7 million 364-day term facility. Offsetting these repayments was approximately $20.0 million of increased debt by PLIVA in part to finance the acquisition of ORCA, and approximately $34.8 million from proceeds from stock option exercises and tax benefits of stock incentives.
Sufficiency of Cash Resources
     We believe our current cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities, investment balances, cash flows from operations and undrawn amounts under our $300.0 million revolving credit facility are adequate to fund our operations, service our debt requirements, make planned capital expenditures and to capitalize on strategic opportunities as they arise.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
     The Company does not have any material off-balance sheet arrangements that have had, or are expected to have, an effect on our financial statements.

32


Table of Contents

Critical Accounting Policies
     The methods, estimates and judgments we use in applying the accounting policies most critical to our financial statements have a significant impact on our reported results. The Securities and Exchange Commission has defined the most critical accounting policies as the ones that are most important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results, and/or require us to make our most difficult and subjective judgments. Based on this definition, our most critical policies are the following: (1) revenue recognition and provisions for estimated reductions to gross product sales; (2) revenue recognition and provisions of alliance and development revenue; (3) inventories; (4) income taxes; (5) contingencies; (6) acquisitions and amortization of intangible assets; (7) derivative instruments; and (8) foreign currency translation and transactions. Although we believe that our estimates and assumptions are reasonable, they are based upon information available at the time the estimates and assumptions were made. We review the factors that influence our estimates and, if necessary, adjust them. Actual results may differ significantly from our estimates.
     There are no updates to our Critical Accounting Policies from those described in our Transition Report on Form 10-K/T for six months ended December 31, 2006. Please see the “Critical Accounting Policies” sections of that report for a comprehensive discussion of our critical accounting policies.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
     In September 2006, the FASB issued FAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in GAAP and expands disclosure about fair value measurements. The statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. We are currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of this statement will have on our consolidated financial statements.
     In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159 The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, providing companies with an option to report selected financial assets and liabilities at fair value. The Standard’s objective is to reduce both complexity in accounting for financial instruments and the volatility in earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently. GAAP has required different measurement attributes for different assets and liabilities that can create artificial volatility in earnings. SFAS 159 helps to mitigate this type of accounting-induced volatility by enabling companies to report related assets and liabilities at fair value, which would likely reduce the need for companies to comply with detailed rules for hedge accounting. SFAS 159 also establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between companies that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. SFAS 159 requires companies to provide additional information that will help investors and other users of financial statements to more easily understand the effect of a company’s choice to use fair value on its earnings. It also requires entities to display the fair value of those assets and liabilities for which companies have chosen to use fair value on the face of the balance sheet. SFAS 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. We are currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of this statement will have on our consolidated financial statements.
     In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FIN No. 48 (“FIN 48”) Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes— an interpretation of FASB Statement 109. FIN 48 establishes a single model to address accounting for uncertain tax positions. On January 1, 2007, we adopted FIN 48, and as a result, recorded a $4.5 million increase in the net liability for unrecognized tax positions, which was entirely recorded as a $4.5 million adjustment to the opening balance of goodwill relating to the PLIVA acquisition. The total amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits as of January 1, 2007 was $25.0 million, and did not change materially as of September 30, 2007. Included in the balance at September 30, 2007 was $13.2 million of tax positions that, if recognized, would affect our effective tax rate. We do not believe that the amount of the liability for unrecognized tax benefits will change materially during the next 52-week period.
     Upon adoption of FIN 48, we have elected an accounting policy to classify accrued interest and related penalties relating to unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense. Previously, our policy was to classify interest and penalties in the Company’s income tax provision. We had $2.6 million accrued for interest and penalties at January 1, 2007 which has not changed materially as of September 30, 2007.
     In June 2007, the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) reached a consensus on EITF Issue No. 07-3, Accounting for Advance Payments for Goods or Services to be Received for Use in Future Research and Development Activities. EITF 07-3 provides clarification surrounding the accounting for nonrefundable research and

33


Table of Contents

development advance payments, whereby such payments should be recorded as an asset when the advance payment is made and recognized as an expense when the research and development activities are performed. EITF 07-3 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2007. We are currently evaluating the impact that adopting this EITF will have on our consolidated financial statements.
Forward-Looking Statements
     The preceding sections contain a number of forward-looking statements. To the extent that any statements made in this report contain information that is not historical, these statements are essentially forward-looking. Forward-looking statements can be identified by their use of words such as “expects,” “plans,” “will,” “may,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “should,” “intends,” “estimates” and other words of similar meaning. These statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that cannot be predicted or quantified and, consequently, actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such risks and uncertainties include, in no particular order:
    the difficulty in predicting the timing and outcome of legal proceedings, including patent-related matters such as patent challenge settlements and patent infringement cases;
 
    the difficulty of predicting the timing of product approvals under NDAs, ANDAs and marketing authorizations;
 
    court and regulatory authorities’ decisions on exclusivity periods;
 
    the ability of competitors to extend exclusivity periods for their products;
 
    our ability to complete product development activities in the timeframes and for the costs we expect;
 
    market and customer acceptance and demand for our pharmaceutical products;
 
    our dependence on revenues from significant customers;
 
    reimbursement policies of third party payors;
 
    our dependence on revenues from significant products;
 
    the use of estimates in the preparation of our financial statements;
 
    the impact of competitive products and pricing on products, including the launch of authorized generics;
 
    the ability to launch new products in the timeframes we expect;
 
    the availability of raw materials;
 
    the availability of any product we purchase and sell as a distributor;
 
    the regulatory environment in the markets where we operate;
 
    our exposure to product liability and other lawsuits and contingencies;
 
    the increasing cost of insurance and the availability of product liability insurance coverage;
 
    our timely and successful completion of strategic initiatives, including integrating companies (such as PLIVA) and products we acquire;
 
    fluctuations in operating results, including the effects on such results from spending for research and development, sales and marketing activities and patent challenge activities;
 
    the inherent uncertainty associated with financial projections;
 
    our expansion into international markets through our PLIVA acquisition, and the resulting currency, governmental, regulatory and other risks involved with international operations;
 
    our ability to service our significantly increased debt obligations as a result of the PLIVA acquisition;
 
    changes in generally accepted accounting principles; and
 
    other risks detailed in our SEC filings from time to time, including in our Transition Report on Form 10-K/T for the six months ended December 31, 2006.
     We wish to caution each reader of this report to consider carefully these factors as well as specific factors that may be discussed with each forward-looking statement in this report or disclosed in our filings with the SEC, as such factors, in some cases, could affect our ability to implement our business strategies and may cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated by the statements expressed herein. Readers are urged to carefully review and consider these factors. We undertake no duty to update the forward-looking statements even though our situation may change in the future.

34


Table of Contents

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
     We are exposed to market risk for changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates. We manage these exposures through operational means and, when appropriate, through the use of derivative financial instruments.
Interest Rate Risk
     Our exposure to interest rate risk relates primarily to our investment portfolio of approximately $470.7 million, borrowings under our credit facilities of approximately $1,850.0 million and approximately $182.0 million of other debt acquired from PLIVA. Our investment portfolio consists principally of cash and cash equivalents and market auction debt securities primarily classified as “available for sale.” The primary objective of our investment activities is to preserve principal while at the same time maximizing yields without significantly increasing risk. To achieve this objective, we maintain our portfolio in a variety of high credit quality debt securities, including U.S., state and local government and corporate obligations, commercial paper and money market funds. Over 95% of our portfolio matures in less than three months, or is subject to an interest-rate reset date that occurs within that time period. The carrying value of the investment portfolio approximates the market value at September 30, 2007 and the value at maturity.
     We manage the interest rate risk of our net portfolio of investments and debt with the use of financial risk management instruments or derivatives, including interest rate swaps and forward rate agreements.
     As of September 30, 2007, a 10% increase in interest rates would have increased the net interest expense of our combined investment, debt and financial risk management portfolios by $5.5 million per year.
Foreign Exchange Rate Risk
     A significant portion of our revenues and earnings are generated internationally in various currencies. We also have a number of investments in foreign subsidiaries whose net assets are exposed to currency translation risk. We seek to manage these exposures through operational means, to the extent possible, by matching functional currency revenues and costs and functional currency assets and liabilities. Exposures that cannot be managed operationally are hedged using foreign exchange forwards, swaps and option contracts.
     As of September 30, 2007, a 10% depreciation in the value of the U.S. dollar would have resulted in a decrease of $5.5 million in the fair value of the Company’s foreign exchange risk management instruments. These movements would have been offset by movements in the fair value in the opposite direction of the underlying transactions and balance sheet items being hedged.
     In addition to the information set forth above, the disclosure under Note 7 — Derivative Instruments included in Part I of this report is incorporated in this Part I, Item 3 by reference.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
     We maintain disclosure controls (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and appropriately communicated to our management, including our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Management necessarily applied its judgment in assessing the costs and benefits of such controls and procedures, which, by their nature, can provide only reasonable assurance regarding management’s control objectives.
     At the conclusion of the three-month period ended September 30, 2007, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon that evaluation, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that

35


Table of Contents

our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms and to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
     There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended September 30, 2007 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, its internal control over financial reporting.

36


Table of Contents

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
     The disclosure under Note 15 — Commitments and Contingencies — Litigation Matters included in Part I of this report is incorporated in this Part II, Item 1 by reference.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
     In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in the “Risk Factors” section in our Transition Report on Form 10-K/T for the six-month period ended December 31, 2006, which could materially affect our business, results of operations, financial condition or liquidity. The risks described in our Transition Report are not the only risks facing us. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently believe are immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition or liquidity. The risks described in our Transition Report have not materially changed.
Item 6. Exhibits
     
Exhibit No.   Description
 
   
31.1
  Certification of Bruce L. Downey pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
   
31.2
  Certification of William T. McKee pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
   
32.0
  Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

37


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
         
 
  BARR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.    
 
       
Dated: November 9, 2007
  /s/ Bruce L. Downey    
 
       
 
  Bruce L. Downey    
 
  Chairman of the Board and Chief    
 
  Executive Officer    
 
       
 
  /s/ William T. McKee    
 
       
 
  William T. McKee    
 
  Executive Vice President, Chief    
 
  Financial Officer, and Treasurer    
 
  (Principal Financial Officer and    
 
  Principal Accounting Officer)    

38