e10vq
Table of Contents

 
 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 
Form 10-Q
(Mark One)
     
þ   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2009.
OR
     
o   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM                      TO                     .
Commission File Number: 001-33807
EchoStar Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
     
Nevada   26-1232727
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or   (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
organization)    
     
100 Inverness Terrace East    
Englewood, Colorado   80112
(Address of principal executive offices)   (Zip code)
(303) 706-4000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Not Applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
             
Large accelerated filer þ   Accelerated filer o  Non-accelerated filer o  Smaller reporting company o
        (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)    
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
As of July 24, 2009, the registrant’s outstanding common stock consisted of 37,930,647 shares of Class A common stock and 47,687,039 shares of Class B common stock.
 
 

 


 

TABLE OF CONTENTS
         
 
       
    i  
 
       
       
 
       
    1  
 
       
    2  
 
       
    3  
 
       
    4  
 
       
    31  
 
       
    45  
 
       
    46  
 
       
 
       
    46  
 
       
    52  
 
       
    53  
 
       
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
    None
 
       
    54  
 
       
    54  
 
       
    55  
 
       
    56  
 EX-31.1
 EX-31.2
 EX-32.1
 EX-32.2

 


Table of Contents

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
DISCLOSURE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
We make “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 throughout this report. Whenever you read a statement that is not simply a statement of historical fact (such as when we describe what we “believe,” “intend,” “plan,” “estimate,” “expect” or “anticipate” will occur and other similar statements), you must remember that our expectations may not be achieved, even though we believe they are reasonable. We do not guarantee that any future transactions or events described herein will happen as described or that they will happen at all. You should read this report completely and with the understanding that actual future results may be materially different from what we expect. Whether actual events or results will conform with our expectations and predictions is subject to a number of risks and uncertainties.
The risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the following:
General Risks Affecting Our Business
    Weakening economic conditions, including the recent downturn in financial markets and reduced consumer spending, may adversely affect our ability to grow or maintain our business.
    We currently depend on DISH Network Corporation, or DISH Network, and Bell TV for substantially all of our revenue. The loss as a customer of, or a significant reduction in orders from or a decrease in selling prices of digital set-top boxes, transponder leasing, digital broadcast operations and/or other products or services to DISH Network or Bell TV would significantly reduce our revenue and adversely impact our results of operations.
    Adverse developments in DISH Network’s business, such as the recent termination of its distribution relationship with AT&T, may adversely affect us.
    We currently have substantial unused satellite capacity, and our results of operations may be materially adversely affected if we are not able to utilize more of this capacity.
    Our sales to DISH Network could be terminated or substantially curtailed on short notice which would have a detrimental effect on us.
    We may need additional capital, which may not be available on acceptable terms or at all, in order to continue investing in our business and to finance acquisitions and other strategic transactions.
    We may experience significant financial losses on our existing investments.
    We may pursue acquisitions and other strategic transactions to complement or expand our business which may not be successful and in which we may lose the entire value of our investment.
    We intend to make significant investments in new products, services, technologies and business areas that may not be profitable.
    We are party to various lawsuits which, if adversely decided, could have a significant adverse impact on our business, particularly lawsuits regarding intellectual property.
    We have not been an independent company for a significant amount of time and we may be unable to make, on a timely or cost-effective basis, the changes necessary to operate as an independent company.
    If we are unable to properly respond to technological changes, our business could be significantly harmed.
    We rely on key personnel and the loss of their services may negatively affect our businesses.

i


Table of Contents

Risks Affecting Our “Digital Set-Top Box” Business
    We depend on sales of digital set-top boxes for nearly all of our revenue and a decline in sales of our digital set-top boxes would have a material adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations.
    Our business may suffer if direct-to-home satellite service providers, who currently comprise our customer base, do not compete successfully with existing and emerging alternative platforms for delivering digital television, including cable television operators, terrestrial broadcasters, and Internet protocol television.
    Our future financial performance depends in part on our ability to penetrate new markets for digital set-top boxes.
    We may be exposed to the risk of inflation which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
    The average selling price and gross margins of our digital set-top boxes has been decreasing and may decrease even further, which could negatively impact our financial position and results of operations.
    Our ability to sell our digital set-top boxes to other operators depends on our ability to obtain licenses to use the conditional access systems utilized by these other operators.
    Growth in our “Digital Set-Top Box” business likely requires expansion of our sales to international customers; we may be unsuccessful in expanding international sales.
    The digital set-top box business is extremely competitive.
    We expect to continue to face competition from new market entrants, principally located in Asia, that offer low cost set-top boxes.
    Our digital set-top boxes are highly complex and may experience quality or supply problems.
    If significant numbers of television viewers are unwilling to pay for premium programming packages that utilize digital set-top boxes, we may not be able to sustain our current revenue level.
    Our reliance on a single supplier or a limited number of suppliers for several key components used in our digital set-top boxes could restrict production and result in higher digital set-top box costs.
    Our future growth depends on market acceptance of high definition, or HD, television.
    If we are unsuccessful in overturning the District Court’s ruling on Tivo’s motion for contempt, we are not successful in developing and deploying potential new alternative technology and we are unable to reach a license agreement with Tivo on reasonable terms, we would be subject to substantial liability and would be prohibited from offering DVR functionality that would in turn place us at a significant disadvantage to our competitors and significantly decrease sales of digital set-top boxes to DISH Network and others.
Risks Affecting Our “Satellite Services” Business
    We currently face competition from established competitors in the satellite service business and may face competition from others in the future.
    Our satellites in orbit are subject to significant operational and environmental risks that could limit our ability to utilize these satellites.
    Our satellites have minimum design lives of 12 years, but could fail or suffer reduced capacity before then.
    Our satellites under construction are subject to risks related to launch that could limit our ability to utilize these satellites.
    Our “Satellite Services” business is subject to risks of adverse government regulation.
    Our business depends substantially on Federal Communications Commission, or FCC, licenses that can expire or be revoked or modified and applications for FCC licenses that may not be granted.
    We may not be aware of certain foreign government regulations.
    Our dependence on outside contractors could result in delays related to the design, manufacture and launch of our new satellites, which could in turn adversely affect our operating results.

ii


Table of Contents

    We currently have no commercial insurance coverage on the satellites we own and could face significant impairment charges if one of our satellites fails.
Risks Relating to the Spin-Off
    We have potential conflicts of interest with DISH Network due to our common ownership and management.
Risks Relating to our Common Stock and the Securities Market
    We cannot assure you that there will not be deficiencies leading to material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting.
    It may be difficult for a third party to acquire us, even if doing so may be beneficial to our shareholders, because of our capital structure.
    We are controlled by one principal shareholder who is our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer.
    We do not intend to pay dividends for the foreseeable future.
    We may face other risks described from time to time in periodic and current reports we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC.
All cautionary statements made herein should be read as being applicable to all forward-looking statements wherever they appear. In this connection, investors should consider the risks described herein and should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. We assume no responsibility for updating forward-looking information contained or incorporated by reference herein or in other reports we file with the SEC.
In this report, the words “EchoStar,” the “Company,” “we,” “our” and “us” refer to EchoStar Corporation and its subsidiaries, unless the context otherwise requires. “DISH Network” refers to DISH Network Corporation and its subsidiaries, unless the context otherwise requires.

iii


Table of Contents

Item 1.   FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Dollars in thousands, except share amounts)
(Unaudited)
                 
    As of  
    June 30,     December 31,  
    2009     2008  
Assets
               
Current Assets:
               
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 63,457     $ 24,467  
Marketable investment securities
    886,738       804,194  
Trade accounts receivable — DISH Network, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of zero
    222,779       297,629  
Trade accounts receivable — other, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $3,402 and $7,182, respectively
    35,362       29,216  
Inventories, net
    47,995       46,493  
Deferred tax assets
    12,123       9,484  
Other current assets
    36,482       17,230  
 
           
Total current assets
    1,304,936       1,228,713  
 
           
 
               
Noncurrent Assets:
               
Restricted cash and marketable investment securities
    11,846       2,846  
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $1,523,896 and $1,447,572, respectively
    1,183,822       1,182,048  
FCC authorizations
    69,810       69,810  
Deferred tax assets
          8,047  
Intangible assets, net
    168,487       185,143  
Marketable and other investment securities
    315,373       156,717  
Other noncurrent assets, net
    54,149       56,475  
 
           
Total noncurrent assets
    1,803,487       1,661,086  
 
           
Total assets
  $ 3,108,423     $ 2,889,799  
 
           
 
               
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)
               
Current Liabilities:
               
Trade accounts payable — other
  $ 189,302     $ 205,660  
Trade accounts payable — DISH Network
    20,456       21,570  
Accrued expenses and other
    91,196       89,324  
Current portion of capital lease obligations, mortgages and other notes payable
    51,894       52,778  
 
           
Total current liabilities
    352,848       369,332  
 
           
 
               
Long-Term Obligations, Net of Current Portion:
               
Capital lease obligations, mortgages and other notes payable, net of current portion
    270,036       293,661  
Deferred tax liabilities
    51,014        
Other long-term liabilities
    16,200       15,220  
 
           
Total long-term obligations, net of current portion
    337,250       308,881  
 
           
Total liabilities
    690,098       678,213  
 
           
 
               
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 10)
               
 
               
Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit):
               
Preferred Stock, $.001 par value, 20,000,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding
           
Class A common stock, $.001 par value, 1,600,000,000 shares authorized, 42,571,145 and 42,382,704 shares issued, 38,463,466 and 38,764,208 shares outstanding, respectively
    43       42  
Class B common stock, $.001 par value, 800,000,000 shares authorized, 47,687,039 shares issued and outstanding
    48       48  
Class C common stock, $.001 par value, 800,000,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding
           
Class D common stock, $.001 par value, 800,000,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding
           
Additional paid-in capital
    3,257,363       3,248,327  
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
    94,179       (10,598 )
Accumulated earnings (deficit)
    (857,019 )     (958,188 )
Treasury stock, at cost
    (75,547 )     (68,045 )
 
           
Total EchoStar stockholders’ equity (deficit)
    2,419,067       2,211,586  
 
           
Noncontrolling interest
    (742 )      
 
           
Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)
    2,418,325       2,211,586  
 
           
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity (deficit)
  $ 3,108,423     $ 2,889,799  
 
           
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

1


Table of Contents

ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
                                 
    For the Three Months     For the Six Months  
    Ended June 30,     Ended June 30,  
    2009     2008     2009     2008  
Revenue:
                               
Equipment revenue — DISH Network
  $ 204,284     $ 301,039     $ 524,603     $ 672,733  
Equipment revenue — other
    70,077       76,951       126,988       151,773  
Services and other revenue — DISH Network
    99,484       93,019       191,369       185,489  
Services and other revenue — other
    9,303       12,331       19,735       27,916  
 
                       
Total revenue
    383,148       483,340       862,695       1,037,911  
 
                       
 
                               
Costs and Expenses:
                               
Cost of sales — equipment
    231,637       317,483       558,654       699,908  
Cost of sales — services and other (exclusive of depreciation shown below — Note 11)
    48,267       57,699       101,051       110,215  
Research and development expenses
    11,222       7,473       20,814       16,619  
Selling, general and administrative expenses
    27,099       33,117       52,894       62,616  
General and administrative expenses — DISH Network
    8,498       6,942       13,256       13,296  
Depreciation and amortization (Note 11)
    59,475       63,015       121,424       123,985  
Impairments of goodwill, indefinite-lived and long-lived assets
                      12,799  
 
                       
Total costs and expenses
    386,198       485,729       868,093       1,039,438  
 
                       
 
                               
Operating income (loss)
    (3,050 )     (2,389 )     (5,398 )     (1,527 )
 
                       
 
                               
Other Income (Expense):
                               
Interest income
    5,489       7,491       14,778       17,956  
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized
    (7,229 )     (8,278 )     (14,515 )     (16,561 )
Unrealized and realized gains (losses) on marketable investment securities and other investments
    (4,277 )     67,848       (2,954 )     66,805  
Unrealized gains (losses) on investments accounted for at fair value, net
    110,063       (7,689 )     116,950       3,215  
Other, net
    (2,460 )     (3,363 )     (5,045 )     (5,605 )
 
                       
Total other income (expense)
    101,586       56,009       109,214       65,810  
 
                       
 
                               
Income (loss) before income taxes
    98,536       53,620       103,816       64,283  
Income tax (provision) benefit, net
    2,536       (5,796 )     (3,389 )     (10,758 )
 
                       
Net income (loss)
    101,072       47,824       100,427       53,525  
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest
    (742 )           (742 )      
 
                       
Net income (loss) attributable to EchoStar common shareholders
  $ 101,814     $ 47,824     $ 101,169     $ 53,525  
 
                       
 
                               
Comprehensive Income (Loss):
                               
Net income (loss)
  $ 101,072     $ 47,824     $ 100,427     $ 53,525  
Foreign currency translation adjustments
    1,420       416       1,163       (784 )
Unrealized holding gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities
    39,809       (22,316 )     166,529       (63,653 )
Recognition of previously unrealized (gains) losses on available-for-sale securities included in net income (loss)
    (1,183 )     (34,716 )     (2,506 )     (35,690 )
Deferred income tax (expense) benefit
    (15,395 )     3,912       (60,409 )     20,485  
 
                       
Comprehensive income (loss)
    125,723       (4,880 )     205,204       (26,117 )
Less: Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest
    (742 )           (742 )      
 
                       
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to EchoStar common shareholders
  $ 126,465     $ (4,880 )   $ 205,946     $ (26,117 )
 
                       
 
                               
Weighted-average common shares outstanding — Class A and B common stock:
                               
Basic
    86,539       89,863       86,505       89,795  
 
                       
Diluted
    86,609       90,261       86,805       91,285  
 
                       
 
                               
Earnings per share — Class A and B common stock:
                               
Basic net income (loss) per share attributable to EchoStar common shareholders
  $ 1.18     $ 0.53     $ 1.17     $ 0.60  
 
                       
Diluted net income (loss) per share attributable to EchoStar common shareholders
  $ 1.18     $ 0.53     $ 1.17     $ 0.59  
 
                       
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

2


Table of Contents

ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
                 
    For the Six Months  
    Ended June 30,  
    2009     2008  
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:
               
Net income (loss)
  $ 100,427     $ 53,525  
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash flows from operating activities:
               
Depreciation and amortization
    121,424       123,985  
Equity in losses (earnings) of affiliates
    4,922       2,696  
Unrealized and realized (gains) losses on marketable investment securities and other investments
    2,954       (66,805 )
Unrealized (gains) losses on investments accounted for at fair value, net
    (116,950 )     (3,215 )
Impairments of goodwill, indefinite-lived and long-lived assets
          12,799  
Non-cash, stock-based compensation
    6,861       11,021  
Deferred tax expense (benefit)
    (4,877 )     (17,628 )
Other, net
    (7,777 )     (703 )
Change in noncurrent assets
    (636 )     (13,904 )
Changes in current assets and current liabilities, net
    11,209       (105,906 )
 
           
Net cash flows from operating activities
    117,557       (4,135 )
 
           
 
               
Cash Flows From Investing Activities:
               
Purchases of marketable investment securities
    (633,816 )     (1,194,985 )
Sales and maturities of marketable investment securities
    728,271       1,113,858  
Purchases of property and equipment
    (105,746 )     (92,931 )
Proceeds from insurance settlement
          40,750  
Change in restricted cash and marketable investment securities
    (9,050 )     564  
Purchase of strategic investments included in marketable and other investment securities
    (31,247 )     (133,692 )
Other, net
    6,155       (86 )
 
           
Net cash flows from investing activities
    (45,433 )     (266,522 )
 
           
 
               
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:
               
Repayment of capital lease obligations, mortgages and other notes payable
    (26,592 )     (23,051 )
Contribution of cash and cash equivalents from DISH Network in connection with the Spin-off
          544,065  
Repurchases of Class A common stock
    (7,502 )      
Net proceeds from Class A common stock options exercised and Class A common stock issued under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan
    960       5,175  
 
           
Net cash flows from financing activities
    (33,134 )     526,189  
 
           
 
               
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
    38,990       255,532  
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
    24,467       41,082  
 
           
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
  $ 63,457     $ 296,614  
 
           
 
               
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:
               
Cash paid for interest
  $ 14,039     $ 16,065  
 
           
Cash received for interest
  $ 13,010     $ 9,783  
 
           
Cash paid for income taxes
  $ 25,168     $ 19,978  
 
           
Vendor financing
  $ 2,083     $ 13,946  
 
           
Non-cash investing activities
  $     $ 15,862  
 
           
Non-cash proceeds from the sale of a company which held certain FCC authorizations
  $     $ 132,900  
 
           
Net assets contributed in connection with the Spin-off, excluding cash and cash equivalents
  $     $ 1,533,485  
 
           
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

3


Table of Contents

ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)
1. Organization and Business Activities
Principal Business
EchoStar Corporation is a holding company, whose subsidiaries (which together with EchoStar Corporation are referred to as “EchoStar,” the “Company,” “we,” “us” and/or “our”) operate two primary business units:
    “Digital Set-Top Box” Business — which designs, develops and distributes digital set-top boxes and related products, including our Slingbox “placeshifting” technology, primarily for satellite TV service providers, telecommunication and cable companies and, with respect to Slingboxes, directly to consumers via retail outlets. Our digital set-top box business also provides digital broadcast operations including satellite uplinking/downlinking, transmission services, signal processing, conditional access management and other services provided primarily to DISH Network.
    “Satellite Services” Business — which uses our eight owned and leased in-orbit satellites and related FCC licenses to lease capacity on a full time and occasional-use basis to enterprise, broadcast news and government organizations. We currently lease capacity primarily to DISH Network, and secondarily to government entities, Internet service providers, broadcast news organizations and private enterprise customers.
Effective January 1, 2008, DISH Network Corporation (“DISH Network”) completed its distribution to us (the “Spin-off”) of its digital set-top box business and certain infrastructure and other assets, including certain of its satellites, uplink and satellite transmission assets, real estate and other assets and related liabilities. We and DISH Network now operate as separate publicly-traded companies, and neither entity has any ownership interest in the other. However, a substantial majority of the voting power of both companies is owned beneficially by Charles W. Ergen, our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer or by certain trusts established by Mr. Ergen for the benefit of his family.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X for interim financial information. Accordingly, these statements do not include all of the information and notes required for complete financial statements prepared under GAAP. In our opinion, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the six months ended June 30, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2009. For further information, refer to the Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (“2008 10-K”). Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. Further, in connection with preparation of the condensed consolidated financial statements and in accordance with the recently issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 165 “Subsequent Events” (“SFAS 165”), we evaluated subsequent events after the balance sheet date of June 30, 2009 through August 10, 2009.

4


Table of Contents

ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Continued
(Unaudited)
Principles of Consolidation
We consolidate all majority owned subsidiaries and investments in entities in which we have controlling influence. Non-majority owned investments are accounted for using the equity method when we have the ability to significantly influence the operating decisions of the investee. When we do not have the ability to significantly influence the operating decisions of an investee, the cost method is used. For entities that are considered variable interest entities we apply the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Interpretation No. 46R, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities — An Interpretation of ARB No. 51” (“FIN 46R”). All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses for each reporting period. Estimates are used in accounting for, among other things, allowances for doubtful accounts, allowance for sales returns, inventory allowances, warranty obligations, self-insurance obligations, deferred taxes and related valuation allowances, uncertain tax positions, loss contingencies, fair values of financial instruments, fair value of options granted under our stock-based compensation plans, fair value of assets and liabilities acquired in business combinations, capital leases, asset impairments, useful lives of property, equipment and intangible assets, and royalty obligations. Illiquid credit markets and general downward economic conditions have increased the inherent uncertainty in the estimates and assumptions indicated above. Actual results may differ from previously estimated amounts, and such differences may be material to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. Estimates and assumptions are reviewed periodically, and the effects of revisions are reflected prospectively beginning in the period they occur.
Revision of Previously Issued Financial Statements
During the three months ended March 31, 2009, we identified an additional $14 million adjustment related to investments in certain marketable investment securities that should have been recorded in the quarter ended December 31, 2008. We have determined that the impact of the prior period amount is not considered material to our consolidated results of operations or financial position for the year ended December 31, 2008. Consistent with the provisions of SAB 108 “Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements When Quantifying Misstatements in the Current Year Financial Statements,” we revised our previously issued 2008 consolidated financial statements as reflected in the December 31, 2008 Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as presented in this Form 10-Q.
The revision increased the loss in our previously reported “Unrealized gains (losses) on investments accounted for at fair value, net,” changing “Total other income (expense),” “Income (loss) before income taxes,” “Net income (loss)” for 2008 by $14 million and our basic and diluted net loss per share by $0.16 to $10.73. Further, our “Other noncurrent assets, net,” “Total noncurrent assets,” “Total assets,” “Accumulated earnings (deficit),” “Total EchoStar stockholders’ equity (deficit),” “Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)” and “Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity (deficit)” were decreased by $14 million. The revision had no impact on the 2008 total cash flows from operating, investing or financing activities in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

5


Table of Contents

ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Continued
(Unaudited)
3. Basic and Diluted Income (Loss) Per Share
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, “Earnings Per Share” (“SFAS 128”) requires entities to present both basic earnings per share (“EPS”) and diluted EPS. Basic EPS excludes dilution and is computed by dividing “Net income (loss) attributable to EchoStar common shareholders” by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if stock awards were exercised.
The potential dilution from stock awards was computed using the treasury stock method based on the average market value of our Class A common stock. The following table reflects the basic and diluted weighted-average shares outstanding used to calculate basic and diluted earnings per share. Earnings per share amounts for all periods are presented below in accordance with the requirements of SFAS 128.
                                 
    For the Three Months     For the Six Months  
    Ended June 30,     Ended June 30,  
    2009     2008     2009     2008  
    (In thousands, except per share data)  
Net income (loss) attributable to EchoStar common shareholders
  $ 101,814     $ 47,824     $ 101,169     $ 53,525  
 
                       
 
                               
Weighted-average common shares outstanding — Class A and B common stock:
                               
Basic
    86,539       89,863       86,505       89,795  
Dilutive impact of stock awards outstanding
    70       398       300       1,490  
 
                       
Diluted
    86,609       90,261       86,805       91,285  
 
                       
 
                               
Earnings per share — Class A and B common stock:
                               
Basic net income (loss) per share attributable to EchoStar common shareholders
  $ 1.18     $ 0.53     $ 1.17     $ 0.60  
 
                       
Diluted net income (loss) per share attributable to EchoStar common shareholders
  $ 1.18     $ 0.53     $ 1.17     $ 0.59  
 
                       
As of June 30, 2009 and 2008, there were stock awards to purchase 4.8 million and 0.6 million shares, respectively, of Class A common stock outstanding not included in the above denominator, as their effect is antidilutive.
Vesting of options and rights to acquire shares of our Class A common stock (“Restricted performance units”) granted pursuant to our long-term incentive plan is contingent upon meeting a certain long-term goal which has not yet been achieved. As a consequence, the following are not included in the diluted EPS calculation:
                 
    As of June 30,
    2009   2008
    (In thousands)
Performance-based options
    796       1,913  
Restricted performance units
    104       115  
 
               
Total
    900       2,028  
 
               

6


Table of Contents

ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Continued
(Unaudited)
4. Marketable Investment Securities, Restricted Cash and Other Investment Securities
Our marketable and other investment securities consist of the following:
                 
    As of  
    June 30,     December 31,  
    2009     2008  
    (In thousands)  
Marketable investment securities:
               
Current marketable investment securities — VRDNs
  $ 449,645     $ 621,740  
Current marketable investment securities — strategic
    302,836       151,050  
Current marketable investment securities — other
    134,257       31,404  
 
           
Total current marketable investment securities
    886,738       804,194  
Restricted marketable investment securities (1)
    2,795       2,846  
 
           
Total marketable investment securities
    889,533       807,040  
 
           
 
               
Restricted cash and cash equivalents (1)
    9,051        
 
           
 
               
Marketable and other investment securities:
               
Marketable and other investment securities — cost method
    27,913       27,913  
Marketable and other investment securities — equity method
    50,386       20,841  
Marketable and other investment securities — fair value method
    237,074       107,963  
 
           
Total marketable and other investment securities
    315,373       156,717  
 
           
Total marketable investment securities, restricted cash and other investment securities
  $ 1,213,957     $ 963,757  
 
           
 
(1)   Restricted marketable investment securities and restricted cash and cash equivalents are included in “Restricted cash and marketable investment securities” on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Marketable Investment Securities
Our marketable investment securities portfolio consists of various debt and equity instruments, all of which are classified as available-for-sale.
Current Marketable Investment Securities — VRDNs
Variable rate demand notes (“VRDNs”) are long-term floating rate municipal bonds with embedded put options that allow the bondholder to sell the security at par plus accrued interest. All of the put options are secured by a pledged liquidity source. Our VRDN portfolio is comprised of many municipalities and financial institutions that serve as the pledged liquidity source. While they are classified as marketable investment securities, the put option allows for VRDNs to be liquidated on a same day or on a five business day settlement basis.
Current Marketable Investment Securities — Strategic
Our strategic marketable investment securities are highly speculative and have experienced and continue to experience volatility. As of June 30, 2009, a significant portion of our strategic investment portfolio consisted of securities of a few issuers and the value of that portfolio therefore depends on those issuers.
We account for debt securities purchased at a discount that is related to credit quality pursuant to the guidance of Statement of Position 03-3, “Accounting for Certain Loans or Debt Securities Acquired in a Transfer,” (“SOP 03-3”). SOP 03-3 limits the yield that may be accreted (accretable yield) to the excess of our estimate of undiscounted

7


Table of Contents

ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Continued
(Unaudited)
expected principal, interest, and other cash flows (including the effects of prepayments) expected to be collected over our initial investment. These investments are accounted for under the cost recovery method, partial accrual or full accrual methods based on management’s quarterly evaluation of these securities.
During 2008, we purchased certain debt securities at a credit related discount and prior to the second quarter we accounted for these securities under the cost-recovery method and classified the entire discount as non-accretable yield in accordance with SOP 03-3. As a result of our second quarter 2009 evaluation, these investments are now accounted for under the full accrual method. The face value of these securities as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 was $175 million and $199 million, respectively. The carrying value, which is equal to fair value, of these securities at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 was $172 million and $88 million, respectively.
Current Marketable Investment Securities — Other
Our other current marketable investment securities portfolio includes investments in various debt instruments including corporate bonds and government bonds.
Restricted Marketable Investment Securities
As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, restricted marketable investment securities included amounts required under our letters of credit.
Marketable and Other Investment Securities
We account for our unconsolidated debt and equity investments under the fair value, equity or cost method of accounting. We have several strategic investments in certain equity securities that are included in noncurrent “Marketable and other investment securities” on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Marketable and Other Investment Securities — Fair Value
We elect the fair value method for certain investments in affiliates whose equity is publicly traded, when we believe the fair value method of accounting provides more meaningful information to our investors. For our investments carried at fair value, interest and dividends are measured at fair value and those amounts are recorded in “Unrealized gains (losses) on investments accounted for at fair value, net.”
Marketable and Other Investment Securities — Cost and Equity
Non-majority owned investments are generally accounted for using the equity method when we have the ability to significantly influence the operating decisions of an investee. However, when we do not have the ability to significantly influence the operating decisions of an investee, the cost method is used.
Our ability to realize value from our strategic investments in companies that are not publicly traded depends on the success of those companies’ businesses and their ability to obtain sufficient capital to execute their business plans. Because private markets are not as liquid as public markets, there is also increased risk that we will not be able to sell these investments, or that when we desire to sell them we will not be able to obtain fair value for them.
Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Marketable Investment Securities
As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, we had accumulated net unrealized gains of $154 million, excluding $60 million of related tax effect, and net unrealized losses of $10 million, with no related tax effect, respectively, as a part of “Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)” within “Total stockholders’ equity (deficit).” A full valuation allowance has been established against the deferred tax assets associated with the 2008 unrealized capital losses. The components of our available-for-sale investments are detailed in the table below.

8


Table of Contents

ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Continued
(Unaudited)
                                                                 
    As of June 30, 2009     As of December 31, 2008  
    Marketable                             Marketable        
    Investment     Unrealized     Investment     Unrealized  
    Securities     Gains     Losses     Net     Securities     Gains     Losses     Net  
    (In thousands)  
Debt securities:
                                                               
VRDNs
  $ 449,645     $ 1     $     $ 1     $ 621,740     $     $     $  
Other (including restricted)
    314,279       103,958       (82 )     103,876       127,803             (13,244 )     (13,244 )
Equity securities:
                                                               
Other
    125,609       49,727             49,727       57,497       2,825             2,825  
 
                                               
Total marketable investment securities
  $ 889,533     $ 153,686     $ (82 )   $ 153,604     $ 807,040     $ 2,825     $ (13,244 )   $ (10,419 )
 
                                               
As of June 30, 2009, restricted and non-restricted marketable investment securities include debt securities of $748 million with contractual maturities of one year or less and $16 million with contractual maturities greater than one year. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities as a result of our ability to sell these securities prior to maturity.
Marketable Investment Securities in a Loss Position
In accordance with the guidance of FASB Staff Position No. 115-1 (“FSP 115-1”) “The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments,” the following table reflects the length of time that the individual securities, accounted for as available-for-sale, have been in an unrealized loss position, aggregated by investment category. We are not aware of any specific factors indicating that the underlying issuers of these debt securities would not be able to pay interest as it becomes due or repay the principal at maturity. Therefore, we believe that these changes in the estimated fair values of these marketable investment securities are related to temporary market fluctuations. In addition, we have the ability and intent to hold our investments in these debt securities until they recover or mature.
                                                                 
    Primary     As of June 30, 2009  
    Reason for     Total     Less than Six Months     Six to Nine Months     Nine Months or More  
Investment   Unrealized     Fair     Fair     Unrealized     Fair     Unrealized     Fair     Unrealized  
Category   Loss     Value     Value     Loss     Value     Loss     Value     Loss  
            (In thousands)  
Debt securities
  Temporary market fluctuations   $ 32,560     $ 32,319     $ (69 )   $     $     $ 241     $ (13 )
 
                                               
Total
          $ 32,560     $ 32,319     $ (69 )   $     $     $ 241     $ (13 )
 
                                                 
                                                                 
    Primary     As of December 31, 2008  
    Reason for     Total     Less than Six Months     Six to Nine Months     Nine Months or More  
Investment   Unrealized     Fair     Fair     Unrealized     Fair     Unrealized     Fair     Unrealized  
Category   Loss     Value     Value     Loss     Value     Loss     Value     Loss  
                            (In thousands)                          
Debt securities
  Temporary market fluctuations   $ 109,219     $ 103,380     $ (13,184 )   $     $     $ 5,839     $ (60 )
 
                                               
Total
          $ 109,219     $ 103,380     $ (13,184 )   $     $     $ 5,839     $ (60 )
 
                                                 

9


Table of Contents

ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Continued
(Unaudited)
Fair Value Measurements
SFAS 157 “Fair Value Measurements” established a new framework for measuring fair value for all financial and non-financial instruments and expanded related disclosures. Broadly, the SFAS 157 framework requires fair value to be determined based on the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. SFAS 157 established market or observable inputs as the preferred source of values, followed by unobservable inputs or assumptions based on hypothetical transactions in the absence of market inputs.
    Level 1, defined as observable inputs being quoted prices in active markets for identical assets;
    Level 2, defined as observable inputs including quoted prices for similar assets; and
    Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring assumptions based on the best information available.
Our assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis were as follows:
                                 
    Total Fair Value as of June 30, 2009  
Assets   Total     Level 1     Level 2     Level 3  
    (In thousands)  
Marketable investment securities
  $ 889,533     $ 127,605     $ 761,928     $  
Marketable and other investment securities
    237,074       45,900       158,654       32,520  
 
                       
Total assets at fair value
  $ 1,126,607     $ 173,505     $ 920,582     $ 32,520  
 
                       
Changes in Level 3 instruments are as follows (in thousands):
         
    Level 3  
    Investment  
    Securities  
Balance as of December 31, 2008
  $ 23,821  
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) included in earnings
    6,241  
Purchases, issuances and settlements, net
    2,458  
 
     
Balance as of June 30, 2009
  $ 32,520  
 
     
Unrealized and Realized Gains (Losses) on Marketable Investment Securities and Other Investments
“Unrealized and realized gains (losses) on marketable investment securities and other investments” on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) includes changes in the carrying amount of our investments as follows:
                                 
    For the Three Months     For the Six Months  
    Ended June 30,     Ended June 30,  
    2009     2008     2009     2008  
    (In thousands)  
Unrealized and realized gains (losses) on marketable investment securities and other investments:
                               
Marketable investment securities — gains (losses) on sales/exchange
  $ 2,494     $ 44,874     $ 3,817     $ 45,254  
Gain on sale of a company which held certain FCC authorizations
          67,624             67,624  
Marketable and other investment securities — other-than-temporary impairments
    (6,771 )     (44,650 )     (6,771 )     (46,073 )
 
                       
Total unrealized and realized gains (losses) on marketable investment securities and other investments
  $ (4,277 )   $ 67,848     $ (2,954 )   $ 66,805  
 
                       

10


Table of Contents

ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Continued
(Unaudited)
Investment in TerreStar
We currently account for our investment in TerreStar using the fair value method of accounting. We have two representatives on TerreStar’s board of directors and have the ability to exert significant influence and believe that the fair value approach provides our investors with the most meaningful information.
We report the TerreStar financial information on a one-quarter lag as TerreStar is a public company but not a “large accelerated filer,” as defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission. As such, the statements of operations data, shown below, includes the three months ended March 31 for each respective period presented. We rely on TerreStar’s management to provide us with accurate summary financial information. We are not aware of any errors in, or possible misstatements of, the financial information provided to us that would have a material effect on our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. The following table provides summarized financial information from TerreStar:
                 
    For the Three Months  
    Ended March 31,  
Statements of Operations Data (unaudited):   2009     2008  
    (In thousands)  
Operating expenses
  $ 35,952     $ 67,194  
 
           
Net income (loss) from continuing operations
  $ (49,463 )   $ (102,950 )
 
           
Net income (loss)
  $ (49,463 )   $ (102,950 )
 
           
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders
  $ (52,077 )   $ (101,499 )
 
           
In August 2009, TerreStar filed its quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009. This report included a disclosure that TerreStar estimates its cash and cash equivalents will not be sufficient to cover its estimated funding needs for 2010 based upon its current plans. We account for our investment in TerreStar using the fair value method of accounting and its financial position as indicated in their Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 could have a material impact on the fair value of our investment in subsequent periods.
5. Inventories
Inventories consist of the following:
                 
    As of  
    June 30,     December 31,  
    2009     2008  
    (In thousands)  
Finished goods
  $ 10,967     $ 17,814  
Raw materials
    28,081       16,756  
Work-in-process
    14,820       15,168  
 
           
Subtotal
    53,868       49,738  
Inventory allowance
    (5,873 )     (3,245 )
 
           
Inventories, net
  $ 47,995     $ 46,493  
 
           
6. Satellites
We currently utilize six owned and two leased satellites in geostationary orbit approximately 22,300 miles above the equator. Our leased satellites are accounted for as capital leases pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 13, “Accounting for Leases” (“SFAS 13”) and are depreciated over the ten-year terms of the satellite service agreements.

11


Table of Contents

ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Continued
(Unaudited)
Prior to 2009, certain satellites in our fleet have experienced anomalies, some of which have had a significant adverse impact on their remaining life and commercial operation. There can be no assurance that future anomalies will not further impact the remaining life or commercial operation of any of these satellites. See “Long-Lived Satellite Assets” below for further discussion of evaluation of impairment. There can be no assurance that we can recover critical transmission capacity in the event one or more of our in-orbit satellites were to fail. We do not anticipate carrying insurance for any of the in-orbit satellites that we own, and we will bear the risk associated with any in-orbit satellite failures. Recent developments with respect to our satellites are discussed below.
Owned Satellites
EchoStar XII. Prior to 2009, EchoStar XII experienced anomalies resulting in the loss of electrical power available from its solar arrays. During March and May 2009, EchoStar XII experienced more of these anomalies, which further reduced the electrical power available to operate EchoStar XII. We currently operate EchoStar XII in full continental United States (“CONUS”)/spot beam hybrid mode. If we continue to operate the satellite in this mode, as a result of this loss of electrical power, we would be unable to use the full complement of its available transponders for the 12-year design life of the satellite. However, since the number of useable transponders on EchoStar XII depends on, among other things, whether EchoStar XII is operated in CONUS, spot beam, or hybrid CONUS/spot beam mode, we are unable to determine at this time the actual number of transponders that will be available at any given time or how many transponders can be used during the remaining estimated life of the satellite. However, there can be no assurance future anomalies will not cause further losses, which could impact the remaining useful life or commercial operation of EchoStar XII. As a result of the May 2009 anomalies on EchoStar XII, we determined that we had a triggering event related to EchoStar XII. See discussion of evaluation of impairment in “Long-Lived Satellite Assets” below. Based on this triggering event we performed an impairment review of the satellite using an undiscounted cash flow model and concluded that the estimated undiscounted cash flows associated with EchoStar XII were still in excess of its carrying value and therefore no impairment was required.
Long-Lived Satellite Assets
We account for impairments of long-lived satellite assets in accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” (“SFAS 144”). SFAS 144 requires a long-lived asset or asset group to be tested for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstance indicate that its carrying amount may not be recoverable. Based on the guidance under SFAS 144, we evaluate our satellites for recoverability at the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are largely independent of the cash flows of other assets and liabilities. Other than the evaluation discussed in EchoStar XII above, certain of the anomalies discussed above, and previously disclosed, may be considered to represent a significant adverse change in the physical condition of a particular satellite. Based on the redundancy designed within each satellite, these anomalies are not considered to be significant events that would require evaluation for impairment recognition, pursuant to the guidance under SFAS 144 because the projected cash flows have not been significantly affected by these anomalies.

12


Table of Contents

ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Continued
(Unaudited)
7. Intangible Assets
As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, our identifiable intangible assets subject to amortization consisted of the following:
                                 
    As of  
    June 30, 2009     December 31, 2008  
    Intangible     Accumulated     Intangible     Accumulated  
    Assets     Amortization     Assets     Amortization  
            (In thousands)          
Contract-based
  $ 190,566     $ (83,418 )   $ 190,566     $ (75,104 )
Customer relationships
    23,600       (13,767 )     23,600       (9,833 )
Technology-based
    73,314       (21,808 )     73,297       (17,383 )
 
                       
Total
  $ 287,480     $ (118,993 )   $ 287,463     $ (102,320 )
 
                       
Amortization of these intangible assets, recorded on a straight line basis over an average finite useful life primarily ranging from approximately three to 20 years.
Estimated future amortization of our identifiable intangible assets as of June 30, 2009 is as follows (in thousands):
         
For the Years Ended December 31,        
2009 (remaining six months)
  $ 16,674  
2010
    31,381  
2011
    25,005  
2012
    23,185  
2013
    23,180  
Thereafter
    49,062  
 
     
Total
  $ 168,487  
 
     
8. Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)
Common Stock Repurchase Program
Our board of directors authorized stock repurchases of up to $500 million of our Class A common stock through and including December 31, 2009. During the six months ended June 30, 2009, we repurchased 0.5 million shares of our common stock for $8 million. As of June 30, 2009, we may repurchase up to $463 million under this plan.
9. Stock-Based Compensation
Stock Incentive Plans
In connection with the Spin-off, as permitted by DISH Network’s existing stock incentive plans and consistent with the Spin-off exchange ratio, each DISH Network stock option was converted into two stock options as follows:
    an adjusted DISH Network stock option for the same number of shares that were exercisable under the original DISH Network stock option, with an exercise price equal to the exercise price of the original DISH Network stock option multiplied by 0.831219.
 
    a new EchoStar stock option for one-fifth of the number of shares that were exercisable under the original DISH Network stock option, with an exercise price equal to the exercise price of the original DISH Network stock option multiplied by 0.843907.

13


Table of Contents

ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Continued
(Unaudited)
Similarly, each holder of DISH Network restricted stock units retained his or her DISH Network restricted stock units and received one EchoStar restricted stock unit for every five DISH Network restricted stock units that they held.
Consequently, the fair value of the DISH Network stock award and the new EchoStar stock award immediately following the Spin-off was equivalent to the fair value of such stock award immediately prior to the Spin-off.
We maintain stock incentive plans to attract and retain officers, directors and key employees. Stock awards under these plans include both performance and non-performance based stock incentives. As of June 30, 2009, we had outstanding under these plans stock options to acquire 6.3 million shares of our Class A common stock and 0.2 million restricted stock units. Stock options granted through June 30, 2009 were granted with exercise prices equal to or greater than the market value of our Class A common stock at the date of grant and with a maximum term of ten years. Historically, our stock awards have been subject to vesting, typically at the rate of 20% to 25% per year, however, some stock awards have been granted with immediate vesting and other stock awards vest only upon the achievement of certain company-wide objectives. As of June 30, 2009, we had 8.4 million shares of our Class A common stock available for future grant under our stock incentive plans.
As of June 30, 2009, the following stock awards were outstanding:
                                 
    As of June 30, 2009  
    EchoStar Awards     DISH Network Awards  
            Restricted             Restricted  
    Stock     Stock     Stock     Stock  
Stock Awards Outstanding   Options     Units     Options     Units  
Held by EchoStar employees
    4,801,087       82,065       3,534,866       410,374  
Held by DISH Network employees
    1,533,770       77,366       N/A       N/A  
 
                       
Total
    6,334,857       159,431       3,534,866       410,374  
 
                       
We are responsible for fulfilling all stock awards related to EchoStar common stock and DISH Network is responsible for fulfilling all stock awards related to DISH Network common stock, regardless of whether such stock awards are held by our or DISH Network’s employees. Notwithstanding the foregoing, based on the requirements of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R, “Share Based Payments” (“SFAS 123R”), our stock-based compensation expense, resulting from stock awards outstanding at the Spin-off date, is based on the stock awards held by our employees regardless of whether such stock awards were issued by EchoStar or DISH Network. Accordingly, stock-based compensation that we expense with respect to DISH Network stock awards is included in “Additional paid-in capital” on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

14


Table of Contents

ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Continued
(Unaudited)
Stock Award Activity
Our stock option activity for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was as follows:
                 
    For the Six Months
    Ended June 30, 2009
            Weighted-
            Average
    Options   Exercise Price
Total options outstanding, beginning of period
    5,184,415     $ 28.61  
Granted
    1,473,000       14.97  
Exercised
    (34,540 )     6.03  
Forfeited and cancelled
    (288,018 )     27.39  
 
               
Total options outstanding, end of period
    6,334,857       25.81  
 
               
Performance based options outstanding, end of period (1)
    795,850       25.61  
 
               
Exercisable at end of period
    1,885,600       29.60  
 
               
 
(1)   These stock options, which are included in the caption “Total options outstanding, end of period,” were issued pursuant to a long-term, performance-based stock incentive plan. Vesting of these stock options is contingent upon meeting certain long-term company goals. See discussion of the 2005 LTIP below.
We realized tax benefits from stock awards exercised during the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 as follows:
                                 
    For the Three Months     For the Six Months  
    Ended June 30,     Ended June 30,  
    2009     2008     2009     2008  
            (In thousands)          
Tax benefit from stock awards exercised
  $ 148     $ 1,127     $ 292     $ 1,247  
 
                       
Based on the closing market price of our Class A common stock on June 30, 2009, the aggregate intrinsic value of our stock options was as follows:
                   
    As of June 30, 2009  
    Options     Options  
    Outstanding     Exercisable  
    (In thousands)  
Aggregate intrinsic value
  $ 1,792     $ 218  
 
           

15


Table of Contents

ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Continued
(Unaudited)
Our restricted stock unit activity for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was as follows:
                 
    For the Six Months
    Ended June 30, 2009
            Weighted-
    Restricted   Average
    Stock   Grant Date
    Units   Fair Value
Total restricted stock units outstanding, beginning of period
    272,856     $ 29.40  
Granted
           
Exercised
    (4,000 )     25.42  
Forfeited and cancelled
    (109,425 )     31.55  
 
               
Total restricted stock units outstanding, end of period
    159,431       28.03  
 
               
Restricted performance units outstanding, end of period (1)
    104,356       26.49  
 
               
 
(1)   These restricted performance units, which are included in the caption “Total restricted stock units outstanding, end of period,” were issued pursuant to a long-term, performance-based stock incentive plan. Vesting of these restricted performance units is contingent upon meeting certain long-term company goals. See discussion of the 2005 LTIP below.
Long-Term Performance-Based Plans
2005 LTIP. In 2005, DISH Network adopted a long-term, performance-based stock incentive plan (the “2005 LTIP”), that certain of our employees participated in prior to the Spin-off, within the terms of its 1999 Stock Incentive Plan. The 2005 LTIP provides stock options and restricted stock units, either alone or in combination, which vest over seven years at the rate of 10% per year during the first four years, and at the rate of 20% per year thereafter. Exercise of the stock awards is subject to a performance condition that a company-specific goal is achieved prior to March 31, 2015.
Contingent compensation related to the 2005 LTIP will not be recorded in our financial statements unless and until the achievement of the performance condition is probable. The competitive nature of our industry and certain other factors can significantly impact achievement of the goal. Consequently, while it was determined that achievement of the goal was not probable as of June 30, 2009, that assessment could change at any time.
In accordance with SFAS 123R, if all of the stock awards under the 2005 LTIP were vested and the goal had been met or if we had determined that achievement of the goal was probable during the six months ended June 30, 2009, we would have recorded total non-cash, stock-based compensation expense for our employees as indicated in the table below. If the goal is met and there are unvested stock awards at that time, the vested amounts would be expensed immediately on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss), with the unvested portion recognized ratably over the remaining vesting period.
                 
    2005 LTIP  
            Vested  
    Total     Portion  
    (In thousands)  
DISH Network awards held by EchoStar employees
  $ 17,757     $ 6,681  
EchoStar awards held by EchoStar employees
    3,605       1,356  
 
           
Total
  $ 21,362     $ 8,037  
 
           

16


Table of Contents

ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Continued
(Unaudited)
Of the 6.3 million stock options and 0.2 million restricted stock units outstanding under our stock incentive plans as of June 30, 2009, the following awards were outstanding pursuant to the 2005 LTIP:
                 
    As of June 30, 2009
            Weighted-
            Average
    Number of   Exercise
    Awards   Price
Stock options
    795,850     $ 25.61  
Restricted performance units
    104,356          
 
               
Total
    900,206          
 
               
Stock-Based Compensation
Total non-cash, stock-based compensation expense for all of our employees is shown in the following table for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 and was allocated to the same expense categories as the base compensation for such employees:
                                 
    For the Three Months     For the Six Months  
    Ended June 30,     Ended June 30,  
    2009     2008     2009     2008  
    (In thousands)  
Cost of sales — services and other
  $     $ 172     $     $ 375  
Research and development expenses
    998       1,349       1,937       3,023  
Selling, general and administrative expenses
    2,409       4,030       4,924       7,623  
 
                       
Total non-cash, stock based compensation
  $ 3,407     $ 5,551     $ 6,861     $ 11,021  
 
                       
As of June 30, 2009, our total unrecognized compensation cost related to our non-performance based unvested stock awards was $34 million and includes compensation expense that we will recognize for DISH Network stock awards held by our employees as a result of the Spin-off. This cost is based on an estimated future forfeiture rate of approximately 1.2% per year and will be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately three years. Share-based compensation expense is recognized based on stock awards ultimately expected to vest and is reduced for estimated forfeitures. SFAS 123R requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. Changes in the estimated forfeiture rate can have a significant effect on share-based compensation expense since the effect of adjusting the rate is recognized in the period the forfeiture estimate is changed.
The fair value of each stock award for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was estimated at the date of the grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions:
                                 
    For the Three Months   For the Six Months
    Ended June 30,   Ended June 30,
Stock Options   2009   2008   2009   2008
Risk-free interest rate
    2.92 %     3.42 %     2.00% - 2.92 %     2.74% - 3.42 %
Volatility factor
    28.91 %     21.86 %     28.48% - 28.91 %     19.98% - 21.86 %
Expected term of options in years
    6.3       6.0       6.2 - 6.3       6.0 - 6.1  
Weighted-average fair value of options granted
  $ 5.58     $ 9.29     $ 4.76 - $5.58     $ 7.85 - $9.29  
We do not currently plan to pay dividends on our common stock, and therefore the dividend yield percentage is set at zero for all periods presented. The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded stock options which have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. Consequently, our

17


Table of Contents

ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Continued
(Unaudited)
estimate of fair value may differ from other valuation models. Further, the Black-Scholes model requires the input of highly subjective assumptions. Changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate. Therefore, we do not believe the existing models provide as reliable a single measure of the fair value of stock-based compensation awards as a market-based model would.
We will continue to evaluate the assumptions used to derive the estimated fair value of our stock options as new events or changes in circumstances become known.
10. Commitments and Contingencies
Contingencies
In connection with the Spin-off, we entered into a separation agreement with DISH Network, which provides among other things for the division of certain liabilities, including liabilities resulting from litigation. Under the terms of the separation agreement, we have assumed certain liabilities that relate to our business including certain designated liabilities for acts or omissions prior to the Spin-off. Certain specific provisions govern intellectual property related claims under which, generally, we will only be liable for our acts or omissions following the Spin-off and DISH Network will indemnify us for any liabilities or damages resulting from intellectual property claims relating to the period prior to the Spin-off as well as DISH Network’s acts or omissions following the Spin-off.
Acacia
During 2004, Acacia Media Technologies, (“Acacia”) filed a lawsuit against us and DISH Network in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The suit also named DirecTV, Comcast, Charter, Cox and a number of smaller cable companies as defendants. Acacia is an entity that seeks to license an acquired patent portfolio without itself practicing any of the claims recited therein. The suit alleges infringement of United States Patent Nos. 5,132,992, 5,253,275, 5,550,863, 6,002,720 and 6,144,702, which relate to certain systems and methods for transmission of digital data. In March 2008, the Court issued an order outlining a schedule for filing dispositive invalidity motions based on its claim constructions. Acacia has agreed to stipulate to invalidity based on the Court’s claim constructions in order to proceed immediately to the Federal Circuit on appeal. The Court, however, has permitted us to file additional invalidity motions, which we have done. The Court has not yet ruled on those motions.
We intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a Court ultimately determines that we infringe any of the patents, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages, and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain user-friendly features that we currently offer to consumers. We are being indemnified by DISH Network for any potential liability or damages resulting from this suit relating to the period prior to the effective date of the Spin-off. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
Broadcast Innovation, L.L.C.
During 2001, Broadcast Innovation, L.L.C. (“Broadcast Innovation”) filed a lawsuit against DISH Network, DirecTV, Thomson Consumer Electronics and others in United States District Court in Denver, Colorado. The suit alleges infringement of United States Patent Nos. 6,076,094 (the ‘094 patent) and 4,992,066 (the ‘066 patent). The ‘094 patent relates to certain methods and devices for transmitting and receiving data along with specific formatting information for the data. The ‘066 patent relates to certain methods and devices for providing the scrambling circuitry for a pay television system on removable cards. Subsequently, DirecTV and Thomson settled with Broadcast Innovation leaving us as the only defendant.
During 2004, the judge issued an order finding the ‘066 patent invalid. Also in 2004, the Court found the ‘094 patent invalid in a parallel case filed by Broadcast Innovation against Charter and Comcast. In 2005, the United

18


Table of Contents

ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Continued
(Unaudited)
States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit overturned the ‘094 patent finding of invalidity and remanded the Charter case back to the District Court. During June 2006, Charter filed a reexamination request with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. The Court has stayed the Charter case pending reexamination, and our case has been stayed pending resolution of the Charter case.
We intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a Court ultimately determines that we infringe any of the patents, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages, and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain user-friendly features that we currently offer to consumers. We are being indemnified by DISH Network for any potential liability or damages resulting from this suit relating to the period prior to the effective date of the Spin-off. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
Finisar Corporation
Finisar Corporation (“Finisar”) obtained a $100 million verdict in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas against DirecTV for patent infringement. Finisar alleged that DirecTV’s electronic program guide and other elements of its system infringe United States Patent No. 5,404,505 (the ‘505 patent).
During 2006, we and DISH Network, together with NagraStar LLC, filed a Complaint for Declaratory Judgment in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware against Finisar that asks the Court to declare that we do not infringe, and have not infringed, any valid claim of the ‘505 patent. During April 2008, the Federal Circuit reversed the judgment against DirecTV and ordered a new trial. Our case is stayed until the DirecTV action is resolved.
We intend to vigorously prosecute this case. In the event that a Court ultimately determines that we infringe this patent, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages, and/or an injunction that could require us to modify our system architecture. We are being indemnified by DISH Network for any potential liability or damages resulting from this suit relating to the period prior to the effective date of the Spin-off. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
Global Communications
During April 2007, Global Communications, Inc. (“Global”) filed a patent infringement action against us and DISH Network in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. The suit alleges infringement of United States Patent No. 6,947,702 (the ‘702 patent), which relates to satellite reception. In October 2007, the United States Patent and Trademark Office granted our request for reexamination of the ‘702 patent and issued an Office Action finding that all of the claims of the ‘702 patent were invalid. At the request of the parties, the District Court stayed the litigation until the reexamination proceeding is concluded and/or other Global patent applications issue.
During June 2009, Global filed a patent infringement action against us and DISH Network in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida. The suit alleges infringement of United States Patent No. 7,542,717 (the ‘717 patent), which relates to satellite reception.
We intend to vigorously defend these cases. In the event that a Court ultimately determines that we infringe the ‘702 patent and/or the ‘717 patent, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages, and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain user-friendly features that we currently offer to consumers. We are being indemnified by DISH Network for any potential liability or damages resulting from this suit relating to the period prior to the effective date of the Spin-off. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.

19


Table of Contents

ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Continued
(Unaudited)
Guardian Media
During December 2008, Guardian Media Technologies LTD (“Guardian”) filed suit against us, EchoStar Technologies L.L.C., DISH Network, DirecTV and several other defendants in the United States District Court for the Central District of California alleging infringement of United States Patent Nos. 4,930,158 and 4,930,160. Both patents are expired and relate to certain parental lock features.
We intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a Court ultimately determines that we infringe any of the asserted patents, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages. We are being indemnified by DISH Network for any potential liability or damages resulting from this suit relating to the period prior to the effective date of the Spin-off. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
Multimedia Patent Trust
On February 13, 2009, Multimedia Patent Trust (“MPT”) filed suit against us, DISH Network, DirecTV and several other defendants in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California alleging infringement of United States Patent Nos. 4,958,226, 5,227,878, 5,136,377, 5,500,678 and 5,563,593, which relate to video encoding, decoding and compression technology. MPT is an entity that seeks to license an acquired patent portfolio without itself practicing any of the claims recited therein.
We intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a Court ultimately determines that we infringe any of the asserted patents, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages, and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain user-friendly features that we currently offer to consumers. We are being indemnified by DISH Network for any potential liability or damages resulting from this suit relating to the period prior to the effective date of the Spin-off. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
NorthPoint Technology
On July 2, 2009, NorthPoint Technology, Ltd (“Northpoint”) filed suit against us, DISH Network, and DirecTV in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas alleging infringement of United States Patent No. 6,208,636 (“the ‘636 patent”). The ‘636 patent relates to the use of multiple low-noise block converter feedhorns, or LNBFs, which are antennas used for satellite reception.
We intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a Court ultimately determines that we infringe any of the asserted patents, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages, and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain features that we currently offer to consumers. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
Personalized Media Communications
In February 2008, Personalized Media Communications, Inc. filed suit against us, DISH Network and Motorola, Inc. in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas alleging infringement of United States Patent Nos. 4,694,490, 5,109,414, 4,965,825, 5,233,654, 5,335,277, and 5,887,243, which relate to satellite signal processing.
We intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a Court ultimately determines that we infringe any of the asserted patents, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages, and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain user-friendly features that we currently offer to consumers. We are being indemnified by DISH Network for any potential liability or damages resulting from this suit relating to the

20


Table of Contents

ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Continued
(Unaudited)
period prior to the effective date of the Spin-off. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
Technology Development Licensing
On January 22, 2009, Technology Development and Licensing LLC (“TechDev”) filed suit against us and DISH Network in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois alleging infringement of United States Patent No. 35, 952, which relates to certain favorite channel features. In July 2009, the Court granted our motion to stay the case pending two re-examination petitions before the Patent and Trademark Office.
We intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a Court ultimately determines that we infringe any of the asserted patents, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages, and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain user-friendly features that we currently offer to consumers. We are being indemnified by DISH Network for any potential liability or damages resulting from this suit relating to the period prior to the effective date of the Spin-off. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
Tivo Inc.
During January 2008, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed in part and reversed in part the April 2006 jury verdict concluding that certain of our digital video recorders, or DVRs, infringed a patent held by Tivo. In its January 2008 decision, the Federal Circuit affirmed the jury’s verdict of infringement on Tivo’s “software claims,” and upheld the award of damages from the District Court. The Federal Circuit, however, found that we did not literally infringe Tivo’s “hardware claims,” and remanded such claims back to the District Court for further proceedings. On October 6, 2008, the Supreme Court denied our petition for certiorari. As a result, DISH Network paid approximately $105 million to Tivo.
We also developed and deployed “next-generation” DVR software. This improved software was automatically downloaded to our current customers’ DVRs, and is fully operational (our “original alternative technology”). The download was completed as of April 2007. We received written legal opinions from outside counsel that concluded our original alternative technology does not infringe, literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, either the hardware or software claims of Tivo’s patent. Tivo filed a motion for contempt alleging that we are in violation of the Court’s injunction. We opposed this motion on the grounds that the injunction did not apply to DVRs that have received our original alternative technology, that our original alternative technology does not infringe Tivo’s patent, and that we were in compliance with the injunction.
On June 2, 2009, the District Court granted Tivo’s contempt motion, finding that our original alternative technology was not more than colorably different than the products found by the jury to infringe Tivo’s patent, that the original alternative technology still infringed the software claims, and that even if the original alternative technology was “non-infringing,” the original injunction by its terms required that DISH Network disable DVR functionality in all but approximately 192,000 digital set-top boxes in the field. The District Court awarded Tivo $103 million in supplemental damages and interest for the period from September 2006 to April 2008, based on an assumed $1.25 per subscriber per month royalty rate. DISH Network posted a bond to secure that award pending appeal of the contempt order. This award does not include sanctions for contempt, which could be substantial.
On July 1, 2009, the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals granted a permanent stay of the District Court’s contempt order pending resolution of our appeal. In so doing, the Federal Circuit found, at a minimum, that we had a substantial case on the merits. The Federal Circuit set an expedited briefing schedule for the appeal with oral argument possible as early as November 2009.
The District Court held a hearing on July 28, 2009 on Tivo’s claims for contempt sanctions, but has ordered that enforcement of any sanctions award will be stayed pending our appeal of the contempt order. Tivo is seeking up to $975 million in contempt sanctions for the period from April 2008 to June 2009 based on, among other things, profits Tivo alleges DISH Network made from subscribers using DVRs. We opposed Tivo’s request arguing, among other things, that sanctions are inappropriate because we made good faith efforts to comply with the Court’s injunction. We also challenged Tivo’s calculation of profits.

21


Table of Contents

ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Continued
(Unaudited)
On August 3, 2009, the Patent and Trademark Office (the “PTO”) issued an initial office action rejecting the software claims of the ‘389 patent as being invalid in light of two prior patents. These are the same software claims that we were found to have infringed and which underlie the contempt ruling now pending on appeal. We believe that the PTO’s conclusions are relevant to the issues on appeal as well as the pending sanctions proceedings in the District Court. The PTO’s conclusions support our position that our original alternative technology is more than colorably different than the devices found to infringe by the jury; that our original alternative technology does not infringe; and that we acted in good faith to design around Tivo’s patent.
In light of the District Court’s finding of contempt, and its description of the manner in which it believes our original alternative technology infringed the ‘389 patent, we are also developing and testing potential new alternative technology in an engineering environment.
If we are unsuccessful in overturning the District Court’s ruling on Tivo’s motion for contempt, we are not successful in developing and deploying potential new alternative technology and we are unable to reach a license agreement with Tivo on reasonable terms, we would be required to cease distribution of digital set-top boxes with DVR functionality. In that event, our sales of digital set-top boxes to DISH Network and others would likely significantly decrease and could even potentially cease for a period of time. Furthermore, the inability to offer DVR functionality would place us at a significant disadvantage to our competitors and make it even more difficult for us to penetrate new markets for digital set-top boxes. The adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations if the District Court’s contempt order is upheld is likely to be significant.
If we are successful in overturning the District Court’s ruling on Tivo’s motion for contempt, but unsuccessful in defending against any subsequent claim that our original alternative technology or any potential new alternative technology infringes Tivo’s patent, we could be prohibited from distributing DVRs. In that event we would be at a significant disadvantage to our competitors who could continue offering DVR functionality and the adverse effect on our business could be material.
Because both we and DISH Network are defendants in the Tivo lawsuit, we and DISH Network are jointly and severally liable to Tivo for any final damages and sanctions that may be awarded by the Court. DISH Network has agreed that it is obligated under the agreements entered into in connection with the Spin-off to indemnify us for substantially all liability arising from this lawsuit. We have agreed to contribute an amount equal to our $5 million intellectual property liability limit under the Receiver Agreement. We and DISH Network have further agreed that our $5 million contribution would not exhaust our liability to DISH Network for other intellectual property claims that may arise under the Receiver Agreement. Therefore, during the three months ended June 30, 2009, we recorded a charge included in “General and administrative expenses — DISH Network” on our Condensed Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) of $5 million to reflect this contribution. We and DISH Network also agreed that we would each be entitled to joint ownership of, and a cross-license to use, any intellectual property developed in connection with any potential new alternative technology.
Because we are jointly and severally liable with DISH Network, to the extent that DISH Network does not or is unable to pay any damages or sanctions arising from this lawsuit, we would then be liable for any portion of these damages and sanctions not paid by DISH Network. Any amounts that DISH Network may be required to pay could impair its ability to pay us and also negatively impact our future liquidity. If we become liable for any portion of these damages or sanctions, we may be required to raise additional capital at a time and in circumstances in which we would normally not raise capital. Therefore, any capital we raise may be on terms that are unfavorable to us, which might adversely affect our financial position and results of operations and might also impair our ability to raise capital on acceptable terms in the future to fund our own operations and initiatives.
Other
In addition to the above actions, we are subject to various other legal proceedings and claims which arise in the ordinary course of business. In our opinion, the amount of ultimate liability with respect to any of these actions is unlikely to materially affect our financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

22


Table of Contents

ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Continued
(Unaudited)
11. Depreciation and Amortization Expense
Depreciation and amortization expense consists of the following:
                                 
    For the Three Months     For the Six Months  
    Ended June 30,     Ended June 30,  
    2009     2008     2009     2008  
    (In thousands)  
Satellites
  $ 25,570     $ 34,785     $ 51,141     $ 69,571  
Furniture, fixtures, equipment and other
    24,011       18,574       50,581       35,136  
Identifiable intangible assets subject to amortization
    8,265       8,222       16,528       16,444  
Buildings and improvements
    1,629       1,434       3,174       2,834  
 
                       
Total depreciation and amortization
  $ 59,475     $ 63,015     $ 121,424     $ 123,985  
 
                       
Cost of sales and operating expense categories included in our accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) do not include depreciation expense related to satellites.
12. Segment Reporting
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 131, “Disclosures About Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information” (“SFAS 131”) establishes standards for reporting information about operating segments in annual financial statements of public business enterprises and requires that those enterprises report selected information about operating segments in interim financial reports issued to stockholders. Operating segments are components of an enterprise for which separate financial information is available and regularly evaluated by the chief operating decision maker(s) of an enterprise. Total assets by segment have not been specified because the information is not available to the chief operating decision-maker. Under this definition, we operate as two business units.
    “Digital Set-Top Box” Business — which designs, develops and distributes digital set-top boxes and related products, including our Slingbox “placeshifting” technology, primarily for satellite TV service providers, telecommunication and cable companies and, with respect to Slingboxes, directly to consumers via retail outlets. Our “Digital Set-Top Box” business also provides digital broadcast operations including satellite uplinking/downlinking, transmission services, signal processing, conditional access management and other services provided primarily to DISH Network.
    “Satellite Services” Business — which uses our eight owned and leased in-orbit satellites and related FCC licenses to lease capacity on a full time and occasional-use basis to enterprise, broadcast news and government organizations. We currently lease capacity primarily to DISH Network, and secondarily to government entities, Internet service providers, broadcast news organizations and private enterprise customers.
The “All Other” category consists of revenue and net income (loss) from other operations including our corporate investment portfolio for which the disclosure requirements of SFAS 131 do not apply.

23


Table of Contents

ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Continued
(Unaudited)
                                 
    For the Three Months     For the Six Months  
    Ended June 30,     Ended June 30,  
    2009     2008     2009     2008  
    (In thousands)  
Revenue:
                               
Digital set-top box
  $ 338,088     $ 429,553     $ 771,945     $ 923,168  
Satellite services
    40,417       48,613       81,352       104,817  
All other
    4,643       5,174       9,398       9,926  
 
                       
Total revenue
  $ 383,148     $ 483,340     $ 862,695     $ 1,037,911  
 
                       
 
                               
Net income (loss) attributable to EchoStar common Shareholders:
                               
Digital set-top box
  $ (8,943 )   $ (9,261 )   $ (15,219 )   $ (6,679 )
Satellite services
    (1,923 )     (2,944 )     (3,435 )     (11,866 )
All other
    112,680       60,029       119,823       72,070  
 
                       
Total net income (loss) attributable to EchoStar common shareholders
  $ 101,814     $ 47,824     $ 101,169     $ 53,525  
 
                       
Geographic Information and Transactions with Major Customers
Geographic Information. Revenues are attributed to geographic regions based upon the location where the sale originated. United States revenue includes transactions with both United States and international customers. All other revenue includes transactions with customers in Europe, Africa, South America, and the Middle East. The following table summarizes total long-lived assets and revenue attributed to the United States and foreign locations.
                         
    United     All        
    States     Other     Total  
    (In thousands)  
Long-lived assets, including FCC authorizations:
                       
As of June 30, 2009
  $ 1,313,585     $ 108,534     $ 1,422,119  
 
                 
As of December 31, 2008
  $ 1,340,229     $ 96,772     $ 1,437,001  
 
                 
 
                       
Revenue:
                       
For the six months ended June 30, 2009
  $ 843,089     $ 19,606     $ 862,695  
 
                 
For the six months ended June 30, 2008
  $ 981,007     $ 56,904     $ 1,037,911  
 
                 

24


Table of Contents

ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Continued
(Unaudited)
Transactions with Major Customers. The following table summarizes sales to our major customers for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 and their respective percentage of total revenue.
                                 
    For the Three Months     For the Six Months  
    Ended June 30,     Ended June 30,  
    2009     2008     2009     2008  
    (In thousands)  
Total revenue:
                               
DISH Network
  $ 303,768     $ 394,058     $ 715,972     $ 858,222  
Bell TV
    53,505       66,838       98,962       109,801  
Other
    25,875       22,444       47,761       69,888  
 
                       
Total revenue
  $ 383,148     $ 483,340     $ 862,695     $ 1,037,911  
 
                       
 
                               
Percentage of total revenue:
                               
DISH Network
    79.3 %     81.5 %     83.0 %     82.7 %
 
                       
Bell TV
    14.0 %     13.8 %     11.5 %     10.6 %
 
                       
13. Related Party Transactions
Related Party Transactions with DISH Network
Following the Spin-off, we and DISH Network have operated as separate public companies and DISH Network has no ownership interest in us. However, a substantial majority of the voting power of the shares of both companies is owned beneficially by our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Charles W. Ergen.
In connection with the Spin-off, we and DISH Network entered into certain transitional services and other agreements pursuant to which we obtain certain services and rights from DISH Network, DISH Network obtains certain services and rights from us, and we and DISH Network have indemnified each other against certain liabilities arising from our respective businesses. Subsequent to the Spin-off, we have entered into certain agreements with DISH Network and may enter into additional agreements with DISH Network in the future. The following is a summary of the terms of the principal agreements that we have entered into with DISH Network that have an impact on our results of operations.
In the near term, we expect that DISH Network will remain our principal customer. However, except as otherwise noted below, DISH Network has no obligation to purchase digital set-top boxes, satellite services or digital broadcast operation services from us after January 1, 2010 because these services are provided pursuant to contracts that generally expire on that date. Therefore, if we are unable to extend these contracts on similar terms with DISH Network, or if we are otherwise unable to obtain similar contracts from third parties before that date, there could be a significant adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial position.
Generally, the prices charged for products and services provided under the agreements entered into in connection with the Spin-off are based on our cost plus a fixed margin, which varies depending on the nature of the products and services provided.
“Equipment revenue — DISH Network”
Receiver Agreement. We entered into a receiver agreement pursuant to which DISH Network has the right but not the obligation to purchase digital set-top boxes, related accessories, and other equipment from us for a two year period ending on January 1, 2010. DISH Network has the right, but not the obligation, to extend the receiver agreement annually for up to two years. DISH Network has exercised its right to renew this agreement for an additional year. The receiver agreement allows DISH Network to purchase digital set-top boxes, related accessories, and other equipment from us at cost plus a fixed margin, which varies depending on the nature of the equipment purchased. We provide DISH Network with standard manufacturer warranties for the goods sold under the receiver agreement. DISH Network may terminate the receiver agreement for any reason upon sixty days

25


Table of Contents

ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Continued
(Unaudited)
written notice. We may terminate this agreement if certain entities were to acquire DISH Network. The receiver agreement also includes an indemnification provision, whereby the parties will indemnify each other for certain intellectual property matters.
“Services and other revenue — DISH Network”
Broadcast Agreement. We entered into a broadcast agreement pursuant to which DISH Network receives broadcast services, including teleport services such as transmission and downlinking, channel origination services, and channel management services from us for a two year period ending on January 1, 2010. DISH Network has the right, but not the obligation, to extend the broadcast agreement annually for up to two years. DISH Network has exercised its right to renew this agreement for an additional year. DISH Network may terminate channel origination services and channel management services for any reason and without any liability upon sixty days written notice to us. If DISH Network terminates teleport services for a reason other than our breach, DISH Network must pay us a sum equal to the aggregate amount of the remainder of the expected cost of providing the teleport services.
Satellite Capacity Agreements. We entered into satellite capacity agreements pursuant to which a DISH Network subsidiary leases satellite capacity on satellites owned or leased by us. The fees for the services to be provided under the satellite capacity agreements are based on spot market prices for similar satellite capacity and depend, among other things, upon the orbital location of the satellite and the frequency on which the satellite provides services. Generally, each satellite capacity agreement will terminate upon the earlier of: (i) the end of life or replacement of the satellite; (ii) the date the satellite fails; (iii) the date that the transponder on which service is being provided under the agreement fails; or (iv) January 1, 2010. We expect to enter into agreements pursuant to which DISH Network will continue to lease satellite capacity on certain satellites owned or leased by us after January 1, 2010.
Nimiq 5 Lease Agreement. During March 2008, we entered into a fifteen-year satellite service agreement with Bell TV to receive service on 16 DBS transponders on the Nimiq 5 satellite at the 72.7 degree orbital location. The Nimiq 5 satellite is expected to be launched in the second half of 2009. Bell TV currently has the right to receive service on the entire communications capacity of the Nimiq 5 satellite pursuant to an agreement with Telesat Canada. During March 2008, we also entered into a transponder service agreement (“Nimiq 5 Transponder Agreement”) with DISH Network pursuant to which DISH Network will receive service from us on all of the DBS transponders covered by our satellite service agreement with Bell TV. DISH Network guaranteed certain of our obligations under our satellite service agreement with Bell TV.
Under the terms of the Nimiq 5 Transponder Agreement, DISH Network will make certain monthly payments to us commencing when the Nimiq 5 satellite is placed into service and continuing through the service term. Unless earlier terminated under the terms and conditions of the Nimiq 5 Transponder Agreement, the service term will expire ten years following the date it is placed in service. Upon expiration of the initial term, DISH Network has the option to renew the Nimiq 5 Transponder Agreement on a year-to-year basis through the end-of-life of the Nimiq 5 satellite. Upon a launch failure, in-orbit failure or end-of-life of the Nimiq 5 satellite, and in certain other circumstances, DISH Network has certain rights to receive service from us on a replacement satellite.
QuetzSat-1 Lease Agreement. During November 2008, we entered into a ten-year satellite service agreement with SES Latin America S.A. (“SES”), which provides, among other things, for the provision by SES to us of service on 32 DBS transponders on the QuetzSat-1 satellite expected to be placed in service at the 77 degree orbital location. During November 2008, we also entered into a transponder service agreement (“QuetzSat-1 Transponder Agreement”) with DISH Network pursuant to which they will receive service from us on 24 of the DBS transponders on QuetzSat-1. The remaining eight DBS transponders on QuetzSat-1 are expected to be used by DISH Mexico.
Under the terms of the QuetzSat-1 Transponder Agreement, DISH Network will make certain monthly payments to us commencing when the QuetzSat-1 satellite is placed into service and continuing through the service term. Unless earlier terminated under the terms and conditions of the QuetzSat-1 Transponder Agreement, the service term will expire ten years following the actual service commencement date. Upon expiration of the initial term, DISH Network has the option to renew the QuetzSat-1 Transponder Agreement on a year-to-year basis through the end-of-

26


Table of Contents

ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Continued
(Unaudited)
life of the QuetzSat-1 satellite. Upon a launch failure, in-orbit failure or end-of-life of the QuetzSat-1 satellite, and in certain other circumstances, DISH Network has certain rights to receive service from us on a replacement satellite.
TT&C Agreement. We entered into a telemetry, tracking and control (“TT&C”) agreement pursuant to which we provide TT&C services to DISH Network and its subsidiaries for a two year period ending on January 1, 2010. DISH Network has the right, but not the obligation, to extend the agreement annually for up to two years. DISH Network has exercised its right to renew this agreement for an additional year. The fees for the services provided under the TT&C agreement are equal to our cost plus a fixed margin which varies depending on the nature of the services provided. DISH Network may terminate the TT&C agreement for any reason upon sixty days prior written notice.
Real Estate Lease Agreements. We entered into certain lease agreements with DISH Network. The rent on a per square foot basis for each of the leases is comparable to per square foot rental rates of similar commercial property in the same geographic area, and DISH Network is responsible for a portion of the taxes, insurance, utilities and maintenance of the premises. The term of each of the leases is set forth below:
Inverness Lease Agreement. The lease for 90 Inverness Circle East in Englewood, Colorado, is for a period of two years ending on January 1, 2010. In August 2009, we and DISH Network agreed to extend this agreement through January 1, 2011.
Meridian Lease Agreement. The lease for 9601 S. Meridian Blvd. in Englewood, Colorado, is for a period of two years ending on January 1, 2010 with annual renewal options for up to three additional years. DISH Network has exercised its right to renew this agreement for an additional year.
Santa Fe Lease Agreement. The lease for 5701 S. Santa Fe Dr. in Littleton, Colorado, is for a period of two years ending on January 1, 2010 with annual renewal options for up to three additional years. DISH Network has exercised its right to renew this agreement for an additional year.
Gilbert Lease Agreement. The lease for 801 N. DISH Dr. in Gilbert, Arizona, is for a period of two years ending on January 1, 2010 with annual renewal options for up to three additional years.
EDN Sublease Agreement. The sublease for 211 Perimeter Center in Atlanta, Georgia, is for a period of three years ending on April 30, 2011.
Product Support Agreement. We entered into a product support agreement pursuant to which DISH Network has the right, but not the obligation, to receive product support (including certain engineering and technical support services) for all digital set-top boxes and related accessories that our subsidiaries have previously sold and in the future sell to DISH Network. The fees for the services provided under the product support agreement are equal to our cost plus a fixed margin, which varies depending on the nature of the services provided. The term of the product support agreement is the economic life of such receivers and related accessories, unless terminated earlier. DISH Network may terminate the product support agreement for any reason upon sixty days prior written notice. In the event of an early termination of this agreement, DISH Network shall be entitled to a refund of any unearned fees paid to us for the services.
Satellite Procurement Agreement. We entered into a satellite procurement agreement pursuant to which DISH Network has the right, but not the obligation, to engage us to manage the process of procuring new satellite capacity for DISH Network. The satellite procurement agreement has a two year term expiring on January 1, 2010. The fees for the services to be provided under the satellite procurement agreement are equal to our cost

27


Table of Contents

ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Continued
(Unaudited)
plus a fixed margin, which varies depending on the nature of the services provided. DISH Network may terminate the satellite procurement agreement for any reason upon sixty days prior written notice. We and DISH Network have agreed that following January 1, 2010 DISH Network will continue to have the right, but not the obligation, to engage us to manage the process of procuring new satellite capacity for DISH Network for a one-year period and for successive one-year periods thereafter; however, DISH Network may terminate these services upon sixty days prior written notice.
Services Agreement. We entered into a services agreement pursuant to which DISH Network has the right, but not the obligation, to receive logistics, procurement and quality assurance services from us. The fees for the services provided under this services agreement are equal to our cost plus a fixed margin, which varies depending on the nature of the services provided. This agreement has a term of two years ending on January 1, 2010. DISH Network may terminate the services agreement with respect to a particular service for any reason upon sixty days prior written notice. We and DISH Network have agreed that following January 1, 2010 DISH Network will continue to have the right, but not the obligation, to receive from us the services previously provided under the services agreement for a one-year period and for successive one-year periods thereafter; however, DISH Network may terminate these services upon sixty days prior written notice.
“General and administrative expenses — DISH Network”
Management Services Agreement. We entered into a management services agreement with DISH Network pursuant to which DISH Network makes certain of its officers available to provide services (which are primarily legal and accounting services) to EchoStar. Specifically, Bernard L. Han, R. Stanton Dodge and Paul W. Orban remain employed by DISH Network, but serve as EchoStar’s Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President and General Counsel, and Senior Vice President and Controller, respectively. Effective March 30, 2009, Carl E. Vogel resigned from the Board of Directors of EchoStar and from his position as Senior Advisor of EchoStar and its subsidiaries. We make payments to DISH Network based upon an allocable portion of the personnel costs and expenses incurred by DISH Network with respect to such DISH Network officers (taking into account wages and fringe benefits). These allocations are based upon the estimated percentages of time to be spent by the DISH Network executive officers performing services for us under the management services agreement. We also reimburse DISH Network for direct out-of-pocket costs incurred by DISH Network for management services provided to us. We and DISH Network evaluate all charges for reasonableness at least annually and make any adjustments to these charges as we and DISH Network mutually agree upon.
The management services agreement is for a one year period commencing on January 1, 2008, and will be renewed automatically for successive one-year periods thereafter, unless terminated earlier (i) by us at any time upon at least 30 days’ prior written notice, (ii) by DISH Network at the end of any renewal term, upon at least 180 days’ prior notice; or (iii) by DISH Network upon written notice to us, following certain changes in control.
Real Estate Lease Agreement. During 2008, we entered into an agreement to sublease space at 185 Varick Street, New York, New York from DISH Network for a period of approximately seven years. The rent on a per square foot basis for this sublease was comparable to per square foot rental rates of similar commercial property in the same geographic area at the time of the sublease, and we are responsible for our portion of the taxes, insurance, utilities and maintenance of the premises.
Transition Services Agreement. We entered into a transition services agreement with DISH Network pursuant to which we have the right, but not the obligation, to receive the following services from DISH Network: finance, information technology, benefits administration, travel and event coordination, human resources, human resources development (training), program management, internal audit, legal, accounting and tax, and other support services. The fees for the services provided under the transition services agreement are equal to our cost plus a fixed margin, which varies depending on the nature of the services provided. The transition services agreement has a term of two years, ending on January 1, 2010. We may terminate the transition services agreement with respect to a particular service for any reason upon thirty days prior written notice. We and DISH Network have agreed that following January 1, 2010 we will continue to have the right, but not the obligation, to receive certain of the services previously provided by DISH Network under the transition services agreement for a one-year period and for successive one-year periods thereafter; however, we may terminate these services upon sixty days prior written notice.
Other Agreements — DISH Network
Packout Services Agreement. We entered into a packout services agreement, whereby we have the right, but not the obligation, to engage a DISH Network subsidiary to package and ship satellite receivers to customers that are not associated with DISH Network or its subsidiaries. The fees charged by DISH Network for the services provided

28


Table of Contents

ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Continued
(Unaudited)
under the packout services agreement are equal to our cost plus a fixed margin, which varies depending on the nature of the services provided. The original one year term of the packout services agreement, which expired on January 1, 2009, was extended for an additional one year. We may terminate this agreement for any reason upon sixty days prior written notice to DISH Network. In the event of an early termination of this agreement, we will be entitled to a refund of any unearned fees paid to DISH Network for the services.
Remanufactured Receiver Agreement. We entered into a remanufactured receiver agreement with DISH Network under which we have the right to purchase remanufactured receivers and accessories from DISH Network for a two-year period ending on January 1, 2010. In August 2009, we and DISH Network agreed to extend this agreement through January 1, 2011. Under the remanufactured receiver agreement, we have the right, but not the obligation, to purchase remanufactured receivers and accessories from DISH Network at cost plus a fixed margin, which varies depending on the nature of the equipment purchased. We may terminate the remanufactured receiver agreement for any reason upon sixty days written notice to DISH Network.
Tax Sharing Agreement. We entered into a tax sharing agreement with DISH Network which governs our respective rights, responsibilities and obligations after the Spin-off with respect to taxes for the periods ending on or before the Spin-off. Generally, all pre-Spin-off taxes, including any taxes that are incurred as a result of restructuring activities undertaken to implement the Spin-off, will be borne by DISH Network, and DISH Network will indemnify us for such taxes. However, DISH Network will not be liable for and will not indemnify us for any taxes that are incurred as a result of the Spin-off or certain related transactions failing to qualify as tax-free distributions pursuant to any provision of Section 355 or Section 361 of the Code because of (i) a direct or indirect acquisition of any of our stock, stock options or assets, (ii) any action that we take or fail to take or (iii) any action that we take that is inconsistent with the information and representations furnished to the IRS in connection with the request for the private letter ruling, or to counsel in connection with any opinion being delivered by counsel with respect to the Spin-off or certain related transactions. In such case, we will be solely liable for, and will indemnify DISH Network for, any resulting taxes, as well as any losses, claims and expenses. The tax sharing agreement terminates after the later of the full period of all applicable statutes of limitations, including extensions, or once all rights and obligations are fully effectuated or performed.
Tivo. Because both we and DISH Network are defendants in the Tivo lawsuit, we and DISH Network are jointly and severally liable to Tivo for any final damages and sanctions that may be awarded by the Court. DISH Network has agreed that it is obligated under the agreements entered into in connection with the Spin-off to indemnify us for substantially all liability arising from this lawsuit. We have agreed to contribute an amount equal to our $5 million intellectual property liability limit under the Receiver Agreement. We and DISH Network have further agreed that our $5 million contribution would not exhaust our liability to DISH Network for other intellectual property claims that may arise under the Receiver Agreement. Therefore, during the three months ended June 30, 2009, we recorded a charge included in “General and administrative expenses — DISH Network” on our Condensed Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) of $5 million to reflect this contribution. We and DISH Network also agreed that we would each be entitled to joint ownership of, and a cross-license to use, any intellectual property developed in connection with any potential new alternative technology.
Related Party Transactions with NagraStar
We purchase security access devices from NagraStar. The table below summarizes our transactions with NagraStar.
                                 
    For the Three Months     For the Six Months  
    Ended June 30,     Ended June 30,  
    2009     2008     2009     2008  
Purchases:   (In thousands)  
Purchases from NagraStar
  $ 16,115     $ 12,211     $ 20,473     $ 19,933  
 
                       
                 
    As of  
    June 30,     December 31,  
    2009     2008  
Amounts Payable and Commitments:   (In thousands)  
Amounts payable to NagraStar
  $ 35,460     $ 32,504  
 
           
Commitments to purchase from NagraStar during 2009
  $ 24,417     $ 29,151  
 
           

29


Table of Contents

ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Continued
(Unaudited)
Related Party Transactions with DISH Mexico
During November 2008, we entered into a joint venture for a direct-to-home, or DTH, service in Mexico known as DISH Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V., or DISH Mexico. Pursuant to these arrangements, we provide certain broadcast services and satellite capacity and may sell hardware such as digital set-top boxes and related equipment to DISH Mexico. Subject to a number of conditions, including regulatory approvals and compliance with various other arrangements, we committed to provide approximately $112 million of value over an initial ten year period, of which $46 million has been satisfied in the form of cash, equipment and services, leaving $66 million remaining under this commitment. Of the remaining commitment, approximately $28 million is expected to be paid in cash and the remaining amounts may be satisfied in the form of certain services or equipment. During the three months ended June 30, 2009, we sold $5 million of set-top boxes and related accessories to DISH Mexico that are not related to the original commitment associated with our investment in DISH Mexico. As of June 30, 2009, amounts receivable from DISH Mexico totaled $4 million.
Related Party Transactions with a Taiwanese Joint Venture
During June of 2009, we entered into an agreement to form a Taiwanese joint venture, for a DTH service in Taiwan and certain other targeted regions in Asia. Pursuant to these arrangements, we sell hardware such as digital set-top boxes and provide certain technical support services. Subject to a number of conditions, including regulatory approvals and entry into various other arrangements, we committed to provide approximately $36 million of value over an initial three year period, of which $18 million will be satisfied in the form of cash and $18 million will be satisfied in the form of a loan.

30


Table of Contents

Item 2.   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
You should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations together with the condensed consolidated financial statements and notes to the financial statements included elsewhere in this quarterly report. This management’s discussion and analysis is intended to help provide an understanding of our financial condition, changes in financial condition and results of our operations and contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. The forward-looking statements are not historical facts, but rather are based on current expectations, estimates, assumptions and projections about our industry, business and future financial results. Our actual results could differ materially from the results contemplated by these forward-looking statements due to a number of factors, including those discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 and this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, under the caption “Item 1A. Risk Factors.”
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Overview
Effective January 1, 2008, DISH Network Corporation (“DISH Network”) completed its distribution to us (the “Spin-off”) of its set-top box business and certain infrastructure and other assets, including certain of its satellites, uplink and satellite transmission assets, real estate and other assets and related liabilities. We currently operate two primary business units: (i) our “Digital Set-Top Box” business, and (ii) our “Satellite Services” business.
“Digital Set-Top Box” Business
Our “Digital Set-Top Box” business designs, develops and distributes digital set-top boxes and related products and technology, including our Slingbox “placeshifting” technology, primarily for satellite TV service providers, telecommunication and cable companies and, with respect to Slingboxes, directly to consumers via retail outlets. Most of our digital set-top boxes are sold to DISH Network, but we also sell a significant number of digital set-top boxes to Bell TV in Canada and other international customers. As part of the Spin-off, DISH Network contributed Sling Media, Inc., a leading innovator in the digital-lifestyle space to us, to complement our existing product line. Slingbox “placeshifting” technology allows consumers to watch and control their home digital video and audio content anywhere in the world via a broadband Internet connection.
Our “Digital Set-Top Box” business also provides digital broadcast operations including satellite uplinking/downlinking, transmission services, signal processing, conditional access management and other services provided primarily to DISH Network.
We believe opportunities exist to expand our business by selling equipment and services in both the U.S. and international markets. As a result of our extensive experience with digital set-top boxes and digital broadcast operations, we can provide end-to-end pay TV delivery systems incorporating our satellite and backhaul capacity, customized digital set-top boxes and related components, and network design and management.
During November 2008, we entered into a joint venture for a direct-to-home, or DTH, service in Mexico known as DISH Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V., or DISH Mexico. Pursuant to these arrangements, we provide certain broadcast services and satellite capacity and may sell hardware such as digital set-top boxes and related equipment to DISH Mexico. Subject to a number of conditions, including regulatory approvals and compliance with various other arrangements, we committed to provide approximately $112 million of value over an initial ten year period, of which $46 million has been satisfied in the form of cash, equipment and services, leaving $66 million remaining under this commitment. Of the remaining commitment, approximately $28 million is expected to be paid in cash and the remaining amounts may be satisfied in the form of certain services or equipment.
During June of 2009, we entered into an agreement to form a Taiwanese joint venture, for a DTH service in Taiwan and certain other targeted regions in Asia. Pursuant to these arrangements, we sell hardware such as digital set-top boxes and provide certain technical support services. Subject to a number of conditions, including regulatory approvals and entry into various other arrangements, we committed to provide approximately $36 million of value over an initial three year period, of which $18 million will be satisfied in the form of cash and $18 million will be satisfied in the form of a loan.

31


Table of Contents

Item 2.   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS — Continued
Dependence on DISH Network. We currently depend on DISH Network for a substantial portion of the revenue for our “Digital Set-Top Box” business and we expect for the foreseeable future that DISH Network will continue to be the primary source of revenue for each of our businesses. Therefore, our results of operations are and will for the foreseeable future be closely linked to the performance of DISH Network’s satellite pay-TV business. In addition, because the number of potential new customers for our “Digital Set-Top Box” business is small and may be limited by our common ownership and related management with DISH Network, our current customer concentration is likely to continue for the foreseeable future.
Changes in DISH Network subscriber growth could have a material adverse affect on our digital set-top box sales. In particular, weaknesses in the economy and other factors adversely affecting DISH Network, such as the decision by AT&T to terminate its distribution agreement with DISH Network effective January 31, 2009, may have an adverse impact on us. According to DISH Network’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, its relationship with AT&T accounted for approximately 17% of DISH Network’s gross subscriber additions. Furthermore, DISH Network has in the last six months experienced declining and negative subscriber growth. To the extent that this trend continues or intensifies as a result of deteriorating economic conditions in the United States or otherwise, sales of our digital set-top boxes to DISH Network may decline.
The impact to us of declining DISH Network subscriber growth may be offset over the near term by an increase in sales to DISH Network resulting from the upgrade of DISH Network subscribers to advanced products such as high definition (“HD”) receivers, digital video recorders (“DVRs”) and HD DVRs, as well as by the upgrade of DISH Network digital set-top boxes to new technologies such as MPEG-4 digital compression technology or Slingbox placeshifting technology. However, there can be no assurance that any of these factors will mitigate declining subscriber growth at DISH Network. In addition, although we expect DISH Network to continue to purchase products and services from us, there can be no assurance that DISH Network will continue to purchase products and services from us in the future.
We may experience significant pressure on margins we earn on the sale of digital set-top boxes and other equipment, including on sales to DISH Network. This pressure may be due to current economic conditions, advancements in the technology and functionality of digital set-top boxes and other equipment. The margins we earn on sales are determined largely through periodic negotiations that could result in pricing reflecting, among other things, the digital set-top boxes and other equipment that best meet our customers’ current sales and marketing priorities, the product and service alternatives available from other equipment suppliers, and our ability to respond to customer requirements and to differentiate ourselves from other equipment suppliers on bases other than pricing.
Our future success may also depend on the extent to which prospective customers that have been competitors of DISH Network are willing to purchase products and services from us. Many of these customers may continue to view us as a competitor as a result of common ownership and related management with DISH Network. If we do not develop relationships with new customers, we may not be able to expand our customer base and our ability to increase or even maintain our revenue will be impacted.
Additional Challenges for our “Digital Set-Top Box” Business. We believe that our best opportunities for developing potential new customers for our “Digital Set-Top Box” business over the near term lie in international markets, and we therefore expect our performance in international markets to be a significant factor in determining whether we will be able to generate revenue and income growth in future periods. However, there can be no assurance that we will be able to sustain or grow our international business. In particular, we have noticed an increase in new market entrants, primarily located in Asia, that offer low cost set-top boxes, including set-top boxes that are modeled after our products or products of our principal competitors. The entry of these new competitors may result in pricing pressure in international markets that we hope to enter. If market prices in international markets are substantially reduced by such new entrants, it may be difficult for us to make profitable sales in international markets.
Furthermore, if we do not continue to distinguish our products through distinctive, technologically advanced features and design, as well as continue to build and strengthen our brand recognition, our business could be harmed as we may not be able to effectively compete on price alone in both domestic and international markets against low cost competitors that are principally located in Asia. If we do not otherwise compete effectively, demand for our

32


Table of Contents

Item 2.   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS — Continued
products could decline, our gross margins could decrease, we could lose market share, our revenues and earnings may decline and our growth prospects would be diminished.
The current economic downturn and tightened credit markets may cause certain suppliers that we rely on to cease operations which, in turn, may cause us to suffer disruptions to our supply chain or incur higher production costs.
Our ability to sustain or increase profitability will also depend in large part on our ability to control or reduce our costs of producing digital set-top boxes. The market for our digital set-top boxes, like other electronic products, has been characterized by regular reductions in selling prices and production costs. Therefore, we will likely be required to reduce production costs in order to maintain the margins we earn on digital set-top boxes and the profitability of our “Digital Set-Top Box” business.
“Satellite Services” Business
Our satellite services segment consists principally of transponder leasing provided primarily to DISH Network, and secondarily to government entities, Internet service providers, broadcast news organizations and private enterprise customers. We began operating the “Satellite Services” business following the completion of the Spin-off using our owned and leased in-orbit satellites, multiple digital broadcast centers and other transmission assets. We are also pursuing expanding our business offerings by providing value added services such as telemetry, tracking and control services to third parties. However, there can be no assurance that we will be able to effectively compete against our competitors due to their significant resources and operating history.
Dependence on DISH Network. We currently depend on DISH Network for a substantial portion of the revenue for our “Satellite Services” business. Therefore, our results of operations are and will for the foreseeable future be closely linked to the performance of DISH Network’s satellite pay-TV business.
While we expect to continue to provide satellite services to DISH Network for the foreseeable future, its satellite capacity requirements may change for a variety of reasons, including the launch of its own additional satellites. Any termination or reduction in the services we provide to DISH Network would increase excess capacity on our satellites and require that we aggressively pursue alternative sources of revenue for this business.
In addition, because the number of potential new customers for our “Satellite Services” business is small and may be limited by our relationship with DISH Network, our current customer concentration is likely to continue for the foreseeable future. Our future success may also depend on the extent to which prospective customers that have been competitors of DISH Network are willing to purchase services from us. Many of these customers may continue to view us as a competitor given the common ownership and management team we continue to share with DISH Network.
Additional Challenges for our “Satellite Services” Business. Our ability to expand revenues in the “Satellite Services” business will likely require that we displace incumbent suppliers that generally have well established business models and often benefit from long term contracts with customers. As a result, in order to grow our “Satellite Services” business we may need to develop or otherwise acquire access to new satellite-delivered services so that we may offer customers differentiated services. However, there can be no assurance that we would be able to develop successful alternative services or the sales and marketing expertise necessary to sell these services profitably.
Adverse Economic Conditions
Our ability to grow or maintain our business may be adversely affected by weakening global and domestic economic conditions, including wavering consumer confidence and constraints on discretionary purchasing, unemployment, tight credit markets, declines in global and domestic stock markets, falling home prices and other factors that may adversely affect the markets in which we operate. Our ability to increase our income or to generate additional revenues will depend in part on our ability to organically grow our business, identify and successfully exploit opportunities to acquire other businesses or technologies, and enter into strategic partnerships. These activities may require significant additional capital that may not be available on terms that would be attractive to us or at all. In particular, current dislocations in the credit markets, which have significantly impacted the availability and cost of

33


Table of Contents

Item 2.   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS — Continued
financing, specifically in the leveraged finance markets, may significantly constrain our ability to obtain financing to support our growth initiatives. These developments in the credit markets may increase our cost of financing and impair our liquidity position. In addition, these developments may cause us to defer or abandon business strategies and transactions that we would otherwise pursue if financing were available on acceptable terms.
Furthermore, unfavorable events in the economy, including a continuation or further deterioration in the credit and equity markets could cause consumer demand for pay-TV services and consequently sales of our digital set-top boxes to DISH Network, Bell TV and other international customers to decline materially because consumers may delay purchasing decisions or reduce or reallocate their discretionary spending.
Future Capital Sources
We primarily rely on our existing cash and marketable investment securities balances, as well as cash flow generated through operations to fund our investment needs. Since we currently depend on DISH Network for a substantial portion of our revenue, our cash flow from operations depend heavily on their needs for equipment and services. As a result, there can be no assurances that we will always have positive cash flows from operations and should our cash flows turn negative, our existing cash and marketable investment securities balances may be reduced. In addition, if we are unsuccessful in overturning the District Court’s ruling on Tivo’s motion for contempt, we are not successful in developing and deploying potential new alternative technology and we are unable to reach a license agreement with Tivo on reasonable terms, we would be required to cease distribution of digital set-top boxes with DVR functionality. In that event, our sales of digital set-top boxes to DISH Network and others would likely significantly decrease and could even potentially cease for a period of time. Furthermore, the inability to offer DVR functionality would place us at a significant disadvantage to our competitors and make it even more difficult for us to penetrate new markets for digital set-top boxes. The adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations if the District Court’s contempt order is upheld is likely to be significant.
If we are successful in overturning the District Court’s ruling on Tivo’s motion for contempt, but unsuccessful in defending against any subsequent claim that our original alternative technology or any potential new alternative technology infringes Tivo’s patent, we could be prohibited from distributing DVRs. In that event we would be at a significant disadvantage to our competitors who could continue offering DVR functionality and the adverse effect on our business could be material.
Because both we and DISH Network are defendants in the Tivo lawsuit, we and DISH Network are jointly and severally liable to Tivo for any final damages and sanctions that may be awarded by the Court. DISH Network has agreed that it is obligated under the agreements entered into in connection with the Spin-off to indemnify us for substantially all liability arising from this lawsuit. We have agreed to contribute an amount equal to our $5 million intellectual property liability limit under the Receiver Agreement. We and DISH Network have further agreed that our $5 million contribution would not exhaust our liability to DISH Network for other intellectual property claims that may arise under the Receiver Agreement. Therefore, during the three months ended June 30, 2009, we recorded a charge included in “General and administrative expenses — DISH Network” on our Condensed Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) of $5 million to reflect this contribution. We and DISH Network also agreed that we would each be entitled to joint ownership of, and a cross-license to use, any intellectual property developed in connection with any potential new alternative technology.
Because we are jointly and severally liable with DISH Network, to the extent that DISH Network does not or is unable to pay any damages or sanctions arising from this lawsuit, we would then be liable for any portion of these damages and sanctions not paid by DISH Network. Any amounts that DISH Network may be required to pay could impair its ability to pay us and also negatively impact our future liquidity.
If we become liable for any portion of these damages or sanctions, we may be required to raise additional capital at a time and in circumstances in which we would normally not raise capital. Therefore, any capital we raise may be on terms that are unfavorable to us, which might adversely affect our financial position and results of operations and might also impair our ability to raise capital on acceptable terms in the future to fund our own operations and initiatives.
Other Risks
Our profitability is also affected by costs associated with our efforts to expand our sales, marketing, product development and general and administrative capabilities in all of our businesses, as well as other expenses that we incur as a separate publicly-traded company. These costs are associated with, among other things, financial reporting, information technology, complying with federal securities laws (including compliance with the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002), tax administration and human resources related functions. As we expand
internationally, we

34


Table of Contents

Item 2.   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS — Continued
may also incur additional costs to conform our digital set-top boxes to comply with local laws or local specifications and to ship our digital set-top boxes to our international customers.
EXPLANATION OF KEY METRICS AND OTHER ITEMS
Equipment revenue — DISH Network. “Equipment revenue — DISH Network” primarily includes sales of digital set-top boxes and related components to DISH Network, including Slingboxes and related hardware products.
Equipment revenue — other. “Equipment revenue — other” primarily includes sales of digital set-top boxes and related components to Bell TV, DISH Mexico and other international customers, including sales of Slingboxes and related hardware products.
Services and other revenue DISH Network. “Services and other revenue — DISH Network” primarily includes revenue associated with satellite and transponder leasing, satellite uplinking/downlinking, signal processing, conditional access management, telemetry, tracking and control, professional services, facilities rental revenue and other services provided to DISH Network.
Services and other revenue — other. “Services and other revenue — other” primarily includes revenue associated with satellite and transponder leasing, satellite uplinking/downlinking and other services provided to customers other than DISH Network.
Cost of sales — equipment. “Cost of sales — equipment” principally includes costs associated with digital set-top boxes and related components sold to DISH Network, Bell TV, DISH Mexico and other international customers, including costs associated with Slingboxes and related hardware products.
Cost of sales — services and other. “Cost of sales — services and other” principally includes costs associated with satellite and transponder leasing, satellite uplinking/downlinking, signal processing, conditional access management, telemetry, tracking and control, professional services, facilities rental revenue, and other services.
Research and development expenses. “Research and development expenses” consist primarily of costs associated with the design and development of our digital set-top boxes, Slingboxes and related components, including among other things, salaries and consulting fees.
Selling, general and administrative expenses. “Selling, general and administrative expenses” consists primarily of selling and marketing costs and employee-related costs associated with administrative services (i.e., information systems, human resources and other services), including non-cash, stock-based compensation expense. It also includes professional fees (i.e., legal, information systems and accounting services) and other items associated with facilities and administration provided by DISH Network and other third parties.
Impairments of goodwill, indefinite-lived and long-lived assets. “Impairments of goodwill, indefinite-lived and long-lived assets” consists primarily of impairments of goodwill, FCC authorizations and satellites.
Interest income. “Interest income” consists primarily of interest earned on our cash, cash equivalents and marketable investment securities, including accretion on debt securities.
Interest expense. “Interest expense” primarily includes interest expense associated with our capital lease obligations.
Unrealized and realized gains (losses) on marketable investment securities and other investments. “Unrealized and realized gains (losses) on marketable investment securities and other investments” consists primarily of gains and losses realized on the sale or exchange of investments and “other-than-temporary” impairments of marketable and other investment securities.

35


Table of Contents

Item 2.   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS — Continued
Unrealized gains (losses) on investments accounted for at fair value, net. “Unrealized gains (losses) on investments accounted for at fair value, net” consists of unrealized gains and losses from changes in fair value of marketable and other strategic investments accounted for at fair value.
Other, net. The main component of “Other, net” is primarily equity in earnings and losses of our affiliates.
Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”). EBITDA is defined as “Net income (loss) attributable to EchoStar common shareholders” plus “Interest expense” net of “Interest income,” “Income taxes” and “Depreciation and amortization.” This “non-GAAP measure” is reconciled to “Net income (loss) attributable to EchoStar common shareholders” in our discussion of “Results of Operations” below.

36


Table of Contents

Item 2.   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS — Continued
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Three Months Ended June 30, 2009 Compared to the Three Months Ended June 30, 2008.
                                 
    For the Three Months        
    Ended June 30,     Variance  
    2009     2008     Amount     %  
Statements of Operations Data   (In thousands)  
Revenue:
                               
Equipment revenue — DISH Network
  $ 204,284     $ 301,039     $ (96,755 )     (32.1 )
Equipment revenue — other
    70,077       76,951       (6,874 )     (8.9 )
Services and other revenue — DISH Network
    99,484       93,019       6,465       7.0  
Services and other revenue — other
    9,303       12,331       (3,028 )     (24.6 )
 
                       
Total revenue
    383,148       483,340       (100,192 )     (20.7 )
 
                       
 
                               
Costs and Expenses:
                               
Cost of sales — equipment
    231,637       317,483       (85,846 )     (27.0 )
% of Total equipment revenue
    84.4 %     84.0 %                
Cost of sales — services and other
    48,267       57,699       (9,432 )     (16.3 )
% of Total services and other revenue
    44.4 %     54.8 %                
Research and development expenses
    11,222       7,473       3,749       50.2  
% of Total revenue
    2.9 %     1.5 %                
Selling, general and administrative expenses
    35,597       40,059       (4,462 )     (11.1 )
% of Total revenue
    9.3 %     8.3 %                
Depreciation and amortization
    59,475       63,015       (3,540 )     (5.6 )
 
                       
Total costs and expenses
    386,198       485,729       (99,531 )     (20.5 )
 
                       
 
                               
Operating income (loss)
    (3,050 )     (2,389 )     (661 )     27.7  
 
                       
 
                               
Other Income (Expense):
                               
Interest income
    5,489       7,491       (2,002 )     (26.7 )
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized
    (7,229 )     (8,278 )     1,049       12.7  
Unrealized and realized gains (losses) on marketable investment securities and other investments
    (4,277 )     67,848       (72,125 )   NM  
Unrealized gains (losses) on investments accounted for at fair value, net
    110,063       (7,689 )     117,752     NM  
Other, net
    (2,460 )     (3,363 )     903       26.9  
 
                       
Total other income (expense)
    101,586       56,009       45,577       81.4  
 
                       
 
                               
Income (loss) before income taxes
    98,536       53,620       44,916       83.8  
Income tax (provision) benefit, net
    2,536       (5,796 )     8,332     NM  
Effective tax rate
    2.6 %     (10.8% )                
 
                       
Net income (loss)
  $ 101,072     $ 47,824     $ 53,248     NM  
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest
    (742 )           (742 )   NM  
 
                       
Net income (loss) attributable to EchoStar common shareholders
  $ 101,814     $ 47,824     $ 53,990     NM  
 
                       
 
                               
Other Data:
                               
EBITDA
  $ 160,493     $ 117,422     $ 43,071       36.7  

37


Table of Contents

Item 2.   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS — Continued
Equipment revenue DISH Network. “Equipment revenue — DISH Network” totaled $204 million during the three months ended June 30, 2009, a decrease of $97 million or 32.1% compared to the same period in 2008. This change resulted primarily from a 31% decrease in unit sales of set-top boxes and an 18% decline in average revenue per unit resulting from a change in the mix of receivers sold.
In the near term, we expect DISH Network to remain the primary customer of our “Digital Set-Top Box” business and the primary source of our total revenue. Pursuant to the commercial agreements we entered into with DISH Network, we are obligated to sell digital set-top boxes to DISH Network at cost plus a fixed margin through January 1, 2011, although DISH Network has no obligation to purchase digital set-top boxes from us during or after this period. In addition, if DISH Network’s subscriber growth continues to decline, it may have a material adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations.
Equipment revenue other. “Equipment revenue — other” totaled $70 million during the three months ended June 30, 2009, a decrease of $7 million or 8.9% compared to the same period in 2008. This change resulted primarily from a $13 million decrease in sales to Bell TV, partially offset by an increase in sales to DISH Mexico and sales of Slingboxes and related hardware products. The number of units sold and average revenue per unit to Bell TV decreased versus the same quarter in 2008 due to a change in sales mix and as a result of the February 6, 2009 amendment to our agreement with Bell TV, discussed below. The sales to DISH Mexico are not part of the original commitment associated with our investment in DISH Mexico.
A substantial majority of our international revenue during the three months ended June 30, 2009 was attributable to sales of equipment to Bell TV. In early 2009, we completed a multi-year contract extension with Bell TV that makes us the exclusive provider of certain digital set-top boxes to Bell TV. The agreement includes fixed pricing over the term of the agreement as well as providing future engineering development for enhanced Bell TV service offerings. There can be no assurance that sales to Bell TV will continue at historical levels, and any decline could adversely affect our gross margins and profitability.
Services and other revenue — DISH Network. “Services and other revenue — DISH Network” totaled $99 million during the three months ended June 30, 2009, an increase of $6 million or 7.0% compared to the same period during 2008. This change was primarily attributable to an increase in uplink services provided to DISH Network related to the launch of Ciel II which commenced commercial operations in February 2009 and continued expansion of DISH Network’s HD local markets, partially offset by a slight decrease in the transponder capacity leased by DISH Network.
Cost of sales — equipment. “Cost of sales — equipment” totaled $232 million during the three months ended June 30, 2009, a decrease of $86 million or 27% compared to the same period in 2008. This change primarily resulted from a decrease in sales of digital set-top boxes and related components to DISH Network and to Bell TV, partially offset by an increase in sales to DISH Mexico and sales of Slingboxes and related hardware products. “Cost of sales — equipment” represented 84.4% and 84.0% of total equipment sales during the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Cost of sales — services and other. “Cost of sales — services and other” totaled $48 million during the three months ended June 30, 2009, a decrease of $9 million or 16.3% compared to the same period during 2008. “Cost of sales — services and other” represented 44.4% and 54.8% of total “Services and other revenue” during the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The overall decrease and the decline in this expense to revenue ratio were primarily driven by a decrease in costs associated with fiber backhaul and a decrease in costs related to certain international programming events.
Selling, general and administrative expenses. “Selling, general and administrative expenses” totaled $36 million during the three months ended June 30, 2009, a decrease of $4 million or 11.1% compared to the same period in 2008. This decrease was attributable to a reduction of our marketing and advertising expenses for Slingboxes and related hardware products and the collection of previously reserved receivables, partially offset by an increase in litigation expense. “Selling, general and administrative expenses” represented 9.3% and 8.3% of “Total revenue” during the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

38


Table of Contents

Item 2.   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS — Continued
Depreciation and amortization. “Depreciation and amortization” expense totaled $59 million during the three months ended June 30, 2009, a $4 million or 5.6% decrease compared to the same period in 2008. The decrease in “Depreciation and amortization” expense was primarily due to less depreciation expense on AMC-15 and AMC-16, partially offset by assets placed in service during 2009. In 2008, we impaired AMC-15 and AMC-16 by the combined amount of $218 million.
Interest income. “Interest income” totaled $5 million during the three months ended June 30, 2009, a $2 million decrease compared to the same period in 2008. This decrease principally resulted from lower cash and marketable investment securities balances and lower percentage returns earned on our cash and marketable investment securities during the second quarter of 2009.
Unrealized and realized gains (losses) on marketable investment securities and other investments. “Unrealized and realized gains (losses) on marketable investment securities and other investments” for the three months ended June 30, 2009 was a net loss of $4 million compared to a net gain of $68 million during the same period in 2008. The change is primarily attributable to a 2008 gain on the sale of a company, which held certain FCC authorizations, for a publicly traded stock.
Unrealized gains (losses) on investments accounted for at fair value, net. “Unrealized gains (losses) on investments accounted for at fair value, net” totaled $110 million during the three months ended June 30, 2009, a $118 million increase compared to the same period in 2008. This change is attributable to increases in fair value related to investments accounted for under the fair value method.
Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. EBITDA was $160 million during the three months ended June 30, 2009, an increase of $43 million compared to the same period in 2008. The following table reconciles EBITDA to the accompanying financial statements.
                 
    For the Three Months  
    Ended June 30,  
    2009     2008  
    (In thousands)  
EBITDA
  $ 160,493     $ 117,422  
Less:
               
Interest expense, net
    1,740       787  
Income tax provision (benefit), net
    (2,536 )     5,796  
Depreciation and amortization
    59,475       63,015  
 
           
Net income (loss) attributable to EchoStar common shareholders
  $ 101,814     $ 47,824  
 
           
EBITDA is not a measure determined in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, or GAAP, and should not be considered a substitute for operating income, net income or any other measure determined in accordance with GAAP. Conceptually, EBITDA measures the amount of income generated each period that could be used to service debt, pay taxes and fund capital expenditures. EBITDA should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with GAAP. EBITDA is used by our management as a measure of operating efficiency and overall financial performance for benchmarking against our peers and competitors. Management believes EBITDA provides meaningful supplemental information regarding liquidity and the underlying operating performance of our business. Management also believes that EBITDA is useful to investors because it is frequently used by securities analysts, investors and other interested parties to evaluate companies in the digital set-top box industry.
Income tax (provision) benefit, net. During the three months ended June 30, 2009, we recorded an income tax benefit totaling $3 million compared to an income tax provision of $6 million during the same period in 2008. This change resulted from the decrease in our effective tax rate which was positively impacted by the release of certain previously recognized valuation allowances established against certain deferred tax assets that are capital in nature.

39


Table of Contents

Item 2.   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS — Continued
Net income (loss) attributable to EchoStar common shareholders. Our net income attributable to EchoStar common shareholders was $102 million during the three months ended June 30, 2009, an increase of $54 million compared to the same period in 2008. This increase was primarily attributable to the changes in revenue and expenses discussed above.

40


Table of Contents

Item 2.   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS — Continued
Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 Compared to the Six Months Ended June 30, 2008.
                                 
    For the Six Months        
    Ended June 30,     Variance  
    2009     2008     Amount     %  
Statements of Operations Data   (In thousands)  
Revenue:
                               
Equipment revenue — DISH Network
  $ 524,603     $ 672,733     $ (148,130 )     (22.0 )
Equipment revenue — other
    126,988       151,773       (24,785 )     (16.3 )
Services and other revenue — DISH Network
    191,369       185,489       5,880       3.2  
Services and other revenue — other
    19,735       27,916       (8,181 )     (29.3 )
 
                       
Total revenue
    862,695       1,037,911       (175,216 )     (16.9 )
 
                       
 
                               
Costs and Expenses:
                               
Cost of sales — equipment
    558,654       699,908       (141,254 )     (20.2 )
% of Total equipment revenue
    85.7 %     84.9 %                
Cost of sales — services and other
    101,051       110,215       (9,164 )     (8.3 )
% of Total services and other revenue
    47.9 %     51.6 %                
Research and development expenses
    20,814       16,619       4,195       25.2  
% of Total revenue
    2.4 %     1.6 %                
Selling, general and administrative expenses
    66,150       75,912       (9,762 )     (12.9 )
% of Total revenue
    7.7 %     7.3 %                
Depreciation and amortization
    121,424       123,985       (2,561 )     (2.1 )
Impairments of goodwill, indefinite-lived and long-lived assets
          12,799       (12,799 )     (100.0 )
 
                       
Total costs and expenses
    868,093       1,039,438       (171,345 )     (16.5 )
 
                       
 
                               
Operating income (loss)
    (5,398 )     (1,527 )     (3,871 )   NM
 
                       
 
                               
Other Income (Expense):
                               
Interest income
    14,778       17,956       (3,178 )     (17.7 )
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized
    (14,515 )     (16,561 )     2,046       12.4  
Unrealized and realized gains (losses) on marketable investment securities and other investments
    (2,954 )     66,805       (69,759 )   NM
Unrealized gains (losses) on investments accounted for at fair value, net
    116,950       3,215       113,735     NM
Other, net
    (5,045 )     (5,605 )     560       10.0  
 
                       
Total other income (expense)
    109,214       65,810       43,404       66.0  
 
                       
 
                               
Income (loss) before income taxes
    103,816       64,283       39,533       61.5  
Income tax (provision) benefit, net
    (3,389 )     (10,758 )     7,369       (68.5 )
Effective tax rate
    (3.3% )     (16.7% )                
 
                       
Net income (loss)
  $ 100,427     $ 53,525     $ 46,902       87.6  
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest
    (742 )           (742 )   NM
 
                       
Net income (loss) attributable to EchoStar common shareholders
  $ 101,169     $ 53,525     $ 47,644       89.0  
 
                       
 
                               
Other Data:
                               
EBITDA
  $ 225,719     $ 186,873     $ 38,846       20.8  

41


Table of Contents

Item 2.   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS — Continued
Equipment revenue DISH Network. “Equipment revenue — DISH Network” totaled $525 million during the six months ended June 30, 2009, a decrease of $148 million or 22% compared to the same period in 2008. This change resulted primarily from a 20% decrease in unit sales of set-top boxes and a 15% decline in average revenue per unit resulting from a change in the mix of receivers sold.
Equipment revenue other. “Equipment revenue — other” totaled $127 million during the six months ended June 30, 2009, a decrease of $25 million or 16.3% compared to the same period in 2008. This change resulted primarily from a $32 million decrease in sales to Bell TV and other international customers, partially offset by an increase in sales to DISH Mexico and in sales of Slingboxes and related hardware products. The number of units sold and average revenue per unit to Bell TV decreased versus the same period in 2008 due to a change in sales mix and as a result of the February 6, 2009 amendment to our agreement with Bell TV, previously discussed. Our sales to international customers other than Bell TV were adversely impacted by low cost competitors that are principally located in Asia. The sales to DISH Mexico are not part of the original commitment associated with our investment in DISH Mexico.
Services and other revenue — DISH Network. “Services and other revenue — DISH Network” totaled $191 million during the six months ended June 30, 2009, an increase of $6 million or 3.2% compared to the same period during 2008. This change was primarily attributable to an increase in uplink services provided to DISH Network related to the launch of Ciel II which commenced commercial operations in February 2009 and continued expansion of DISH Network’s HD local markets, partially offset by a slight decrease in the transponder capacity leased by DISH Network.
Services and other revenue — other. “Services and other revenue — other” totaled $20 million during the six months ended June 30, 2009, a decrease of $8 million or 29.3% compared to the same period during 2008. The change was driven primarily by a decrease in revenue from several non-recurring sources in the first quarter of 2008 that had minimal associated costs, partially offset by an increase in transponder leasing provided to customers other than DISH Network.
Cost of sales — equipment. “Cost of sales — equipment” totaled $559 million during the six months ended June 30, 2009, a decrease of $141 million or 20.2% compared to the same period in 2008. This change primarily resulted from a decrease in sales of digital set-top boxes and related components to DISH Network, Bell TV and to other international customers, partially offset by an increase in sales to DISH Mexico and sales of Slingboxes and related hardware products. “Cost of sales — equipment” represented 85.7% and 84.9% of total equipment sales during the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The increase in the expense to revenue ratio principally resulted from a decline in the number of, and margins on, sales of digital set-top boxes and related components to Bell TV and other international customers.
Cost of sales — services and other. “Cost of sales — services and other” totaled $101 million during the six months ended June 30, 2009, a decrease of $9 million or 8.3% compared to the same period in 2008. “Cost of sales — services and other” represented 47.9% and 51.6% of total “Services and other revenue” during the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The overall decrease and the decline in the expense to revenue ratio was primarily driven by decreases in costs related to certain international programming events and in certain transponder leasing costs which ceased during the first quarter of 2008.
Selling, general and administrative expenses. “Selling, general and administrative expenses” totaled $66 million during the six months ended June 30, 2009, a decrease of $10 million or 12.9% compared to the same period in 2008. This decrease was attributable to a reduction of our marketing and advertising expenses for Slingboxes and related hardware products and the collection of previously reserved receivables, partially offset by an increase in litigation expense. “Selling, general and administrative expenses” represented 7.7% and 7.3% of “Total revenue” during the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Impairments of goodwill, indefinite-lived and long-lived assets. “Impairments of goodwill, indefinite-lived and long-lived assets” totaled $13 million during the six months ended June 30, 2008. In connection with the AMC-14 launch anomaly, we wrote-off certain deposits, capitalized interest and insurance costs, net of insurance proceeds.

42


Table of Contents

Item 2.   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS — Continued
Interest income. “Interest income” totaled $15 million during the six months ended June 30, 2009, a $3 million decrease compared to the same period in 2008. This decrease principally resulted from lower cash and marketable investment securities balances and lower percentage returns earned on our cash and marketable investment securities during 2009.
Unrealized and realized gains (losses) on marketable investment securities and other investments. “Unrealized and realized gains (losses) on marketable investment securities and other investments” for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was a net loss of $3 million compared to a net gain of $67 million during the same period in 2008. The change is primarily attributable to a 2008 gain on the sale of a company, which held certain FCC authorizations, for a publicly traded stock.
Unrealized gains (losses) on investments accounted for at fair value, net. “Unrealized gains (losses) on investments accounted for at fair value, net” totaled $117 million during the six months ended June 30, 2009, a $114 million increase compared to the same period in 2008. This change is attributable to increases in fair value related to investments accounted for under the fair value method.
Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. EBITDA was $226 million during the six months ended June 30, 2009, an increase of $39 million compared to the same period in 2008. The following table reconciles EBITDA to the accompanying financial statements.
                 
    For the Six Months  
    Ended June 30,  
    2009     2008  
    (In thousands)  
EBITDA
  $ 225,719     $ 186,873  
Less:
               
Interest expense, net
    (263 )     (1,395 )
Income tax provision (benefit), net
    3,389       10,758  
Depreciation and amortization
    121,424       123,985  
 
           
Net income (loss) attributable to EchoStar common shareholders
  $ 101,169     $ 53,525  
 
           
EBITDA is not a measure determined in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, or GAAP, and should not be considered a substitute for operating income, net income or any other measure determined in accordance with GAAP. Conceptually, EBITDA measures the amount of income generated each period that could be used to service debt, pay taxes and fund capital expenditures. EBITDA should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with GAAP.
EBITDA is used by our management as a measure of operating efficiency and overall financial performance for benchmarking against our peers and competitors. Management believes EBITDA provides meaningful supplemental information regarding liquidity and the underlying operating performance of our business. Management also believes that EBITDA is useful to investors because it is frequently used by securities analysts, investors and other interested parties to evaluate companies in the digital set-top box industry.
Income tax (provision) benefit, net. During the six months ended June 30, 2009, we recorded an income tax provision totaling $3 million compared to $11 million during the same period in 2008. The change resulted from a decrease in our effective tax rate primarily related to the release of certain previously recognized valuation allowances established against certain deferred tax assets that are capital in nature, partially offset by an increase in “Income (loss) before income taxes.”
Net income (loss) attributable to EchoStar common shareholders. Our net income attributable to common shareholders was $101 million during the six months ended June 30, 2009, an increase of $48 million compared to the same period in 2008. This increase was primarily attributable to the changes in revenue and expenses discussed above.

43


Table of Contents

Item 2.   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS — Continued
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Marketable Investment Securities
We consider all liquid investments purchased within 90 days of their maturity to be cash equivalents. See “Item 3. — Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk” for further discussion regarding our marketable investment securities. As of June 30, 2009, our cash, cash equivalents and current marketable investment securities totaled $950 million compared to $829 million as of December 31, 2008. As of June 30, 2009 our $950 million of cash, cash equivalents and current marketable investment securities included $197 million of securities of a single issuer. The $121 million increase in cash, cash equivalents and current marketable investment securities was primarily related to an increase in the value of certain marketable investment securities and cash generated from operations, partially offset by capital expenditures, purchases of marketable investment securities, repayment of debt and repurchases of our Class A common stock.
We have investments in various debt and equity instruments including corporate bonds, corporate equity securities, government bonds, and variable rate demand notes (“VRDNs”). VRDNs are long-term floating rate municipal bonds with embedded put options that allow the bondholder to sell the security at par plus accrued interest. All of the put options are secured by a pledged liquidity source. Our VRDN portfolio is comprised of many municipalities and financial institutions that serve as the pledged liquidity source. While they are classified as marketable investment securities, the put option allows VRDNs to be liquidated on a same day or on a five business day settlement basis. As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, we held VRDNs with fair values of $450 million and $622 million, respectively.
The following discussion highlights our cash flow activities during the six months ended June 30, 2009.
Cash Flow
Cash flows from operating activities
For the six months ended June 30, 2009, we reported net cash flows from operating activities of $118 million. This amount primarily includes net income adjusted for “Depreciation and amortization” and “Unrealized (gains) losses on investments accounted for at fair value, net” of $105 million and changes in working capital.
Cash flows from investing activities
For the six months ended June 30, 2009, we reported net cash outflows from investing activities of $45 million primarily related to capital expenditures of $106 million and purchases of strategic investments of $31 million, partially offset by net sales of marketable investment securities of $94 million. The capital expenditures include $62 million of satellite related capital expenditures and $44 million of other corporate capital expenditures.
Cash flows from financing activities
For the six months ended June 30, 2009, we reported net cash outflows from financing activities of $33 million primarily resulting from debt repayments and repurchases of our Class A common stock.
Future Capital Sources
We primarily rely on our existing cash and marketable investment securities balances, as well as cash flow generated through operations to fund our investment needs. Since we currently depend on DISH Network for a substantial portion of our revenue, our cash flow from operations depend heavily on their needs for equipment and services. As a result, there can be no assurances that we will always have positive cash flows from operations and should our cash flows turn negative, our existing cash and marketable investment securities balances may be reduced. In addition, if we are unsuccessful in overturning the District Court’s ruling on Tivo’s motion for contempt, we are not successful in developing and deploying potential new alternative technology and we are unable to reach a license agreement with Tivo on reasonable terms, we would be required to cease distribution of digital set-top boxes with DVR functionality. In that event, our sales of digital set-top boxes to DISH Network and others would likely significantly decrease and could even potentially cease for a period of time. Furthermore, the inability to offer DVR functionality would place us at a significant disadvantage to our competitors and make it even more difficult for us to penetrate new markets for digital set-top boxes. The adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations if the District Court’s contempt order is upheld is likely to be significant.
If we are successful in overturning the District Court’s ruling on Tivo’s motion for contempt, but unsuccessful in defending against any subsequent claim that our original alternative technology or any potential new alternative technology infringes Tivo’s patent, we could be prohibited from distributing DVRs. In that event we would be at a significant disadvantage to our competitors who could continue offering DVR functionality and the adverse effect on our business could be material.
Because both we and DISH Network are defendants in the Tivo lawsuit, we and DISH Network are jointly and severally liable to Tivo for any final damages and sanctions that may be awarded by the Court. DISH Network has agreed that it is obligated under the agreements entered into in connection with the Spin-off to indemnify us for substantially all liability arising from this lawsuit. We have agreed to contribute an amount equal to our $5 million intellectual property liability limit under the Receiver Agreement. We and DISH Network have further agreed that our $5 million contribution would not exhaust our liability to DISH Network for other intellectual property claims that may arise under the Receiver Agreement. Therefore, during the three months ended June 30, 2009, we recorded a charge included in “General and administrative expenses — DISH Network” on our Condensed Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) of $5 million to reflect this contribution. We and DISH Network also agreed that we would each be entitled to joint ownership of, and a cross-license to use, any intellectual property developed in connection with any potential new alternative technology.
Because we are jointly and severally liable with DISH Network, to the extent that DISH Network does not or is unable to pay any damages or sanctions arising from this lawsuit, we would then be liable for any portion of these damages and sanctions not paid by DISH Network. Any amounts that DISH Network may be required to pay could impair its ability to pay us and also negatively impact our future liquidity.
If we become liable for any portion of these damages or sanctions, we may be required to raise additional capital at a time and in circumstances in which we would normally not raise capital. Therefore, any capital we raise may be on terms that are unfavorable to us, which might adversely affect our financial position and results of operations and might also impair our ability to raise capital on acceptable terms in the future to fund our own operations and initiatives.

44


Table of Contents

Item 2.   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS — Continued
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
In general, we do not engage in off-balance sheet financing activities.
Item 3.   QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Market Risks Associated With Financial Instruments
Our investments and debt are exposed to market risks, discussed below.
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Marketable Investment Securities. As of June 30, 2009, our restricted and unrestricted cash, cash equivalents and current marketable investment securities had a fair value of $962 million. Of that amount, a total of $659 million was invested in: (a) cash; (b) debt instruments of the U.S. Government and its agencies; (c) commercial paper and notes with an overall average maturity of less than one year and rated in one of the four highest rating categories by at least two nationally recognized statistical rating organizations; and (d) instruments with similar risk characteristics to the commercial paper described above. The primary purpose of these investing activities has been to preserve principal until the cash is required to, among other things, fund operations, make strategic investments and expand the business. Consequently, the size of this portfolio fluctuates significantly as cash is received and used in our business. As of June 30, 2009, all of the $659 million was invested in fixed or variable rate instruments. The value of these investments can be impacted by interest rate fluctuations, but while an increase in interest rates would ordinarily adversely impact the fair value of fixed rate investments, we normally hold these investments to maturity. Further, the value could be lowered by credit losses should economic conditions worsen.
Strategic Marketable Investment Securities. In general, our marketable investment securities portfolio includes debt and equity of public companies we hold for strategic and financial purposes. As of June 30, 2009, we held strategic and financial debt and equity investments of public companies with a fair value of $303 million. These investments, which are concentrated in a few companies, are highly speculative and have experienced and continue to experience volatility. The fair value of our strategic and financial debt and equity investments can be significantly impacted by the risk of adverse changes in securities markets generally, as well as risks related to the performance of the

45


Table of Contents

Item 3.   QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK — Continued
companies whose securities we have invested in, risks associated with specific industries, and other factors. These investments are subject to significant fluctuations in fair value due to the volatility of the securities markets and of the underlying businesses. A hypothetical 10% adverse change in the price of our public strategic debt and equity investments would result in approximately a $30 million decrease in the fair value of these investments.
Marketable and Other Investment Securities. We are exposed to equity risk as it relates to changes in the market value of our other investments which totaled $315 million as of June 30, 2009. We invest in equity instruments of public and private companies for operational, financial and strategic business purposes. These securities are subject to significant fluctuations in market value due to volatility of the stock market and the industry in which the companies operate. A hypothetical 10% adverse change in the price of these equity instruments would result in an approximate $32 million decrease in the value of these investments.
Our ability to realize value from our strategic investments in companies that are not publicly traded depends on the success of those companies’ businesses and their ability to obtain sufficient capital to execute their business plans. Because private markets are not as liquid as public markets, there is also increased risk that we will not be able to sell these investments, or that when we desire to sell them we will not be able to obtain fair value for them.
Interest Rate Risk. Our cash, cash equivalents and marketable investment securities had an average annual return for the six months ended June 30, 2009 of 4.0%. A hypothetical 10% decrease in the average interest rates would result in a decrease of approximately $3 million in annual interest income. The value of certain of the investments in this portfolio can be impacted by, among other things, the risk of adverse changes in securities and economic markets, as well as the risks related to the performance of the companies whose commercial paper and other instruments we hold. The value of these investments can also be impacted by interest rate fluctuations.
Long Term Debt. As of June 30, 2009, we had $322 million of long-term debt, of which $314 million represents our capital lease obligations, which are not subject to the requirements of Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 107 “Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments” (“FAS 107”).
Derivative Financial Instruments
In general, we do not use derivative financial instruments for hedging or speculative purposes, but we may do so in the future.
Item 4.   CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) during our most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.   LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
In connection with the Spin-off, we entered into a separation agreement with DISH Network, which provides among other things for the division of certain liabilities, including liabilities resulting from litigation. Under the terms of the separation agreement, we have assumed certain liabilities that relate to our business including certain designated liabilities for acts or omissions prior to the Spin-off. Certain specific provisions govern intellectual property related claims under which, generally,

46


Table of Contents

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION — Continued
we will only be liable for our acts or omissions following the Spin-off and DISH Network will indemnify us for any liabilities or damages resulting from intellectual property claims relating to the period prior to the Spin-off as well as DISH Network’s acts or omissions following the Spin-off.
Acacia
During 2004, Acacia Media Technologies, (“Acacia”) filed a lawsuit against us and DISH Network in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The suit also named DirecTV, Comcast, Charter, Cox and a number of smaller cable companies as defendants. Acacia is an entity that seeks to license an acquired patent portfolio without itself practicing any of the claims recited therein. The suit alleges infringement of United States Patent Nos. 5,132,992, 5,253,275, 5,550,863, 6,002,720 and 6,144,702, which relate to certain systems and methods for transmission of digital data. In March 2008, the Court issued an order outlining a schedule for filing dispositive invalidity motions based on its claim constructions. Acacia has agreed to stipulate to invalidity based on the Court’s claim constructions in order to proceed immediately to the Federal Circuit on appeal. The Court, however, has permitted us to file additional invalidity motions, which we have done. The Court has not yet ruled on those motions.
We intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a Court ultimately determines that we infringe any of the patents, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages, and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain user-friendly features that we currently offer to consumers. We are being indemnified by DISH Network for any potential liability or damages resulting from this suit relating to the period prior to the effective date of the Spin-off. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
Broadcast Innovation, L.L.C.
During 2001, Broadcast Innovation, L.L.C. (“Broadcast Innovation”) filed a lawsuit against DISH Network, DirecTV, Thomson Consumer Electronics and others in United States District Court in Denver, Colorado. The suit alleges infringement of United States Patent Nos. 6,076,094 (the ‘094 patent) and 4,992,066 (the ‘066 patent). The ‘094 patent relates to certain methods and devices for transmitting and receiving data along with specific formatting information for the data. The ‘066 patent relates to certain methods and devices for providing the scrambling circuitry for a pay television system on removable cards. Subsequently, DirecTV and Thomson settled with Broadcast Innovation leaving us as the only defendant.
During 2004, the judge issued an order finding the ‘066 patent invalid. Also in 2004, the Court found the ‘094 patent invalid in a parallel case filed by Broadcast Innovation against Charter and Comcast. In 2005, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit overturned the ‘094 patent finding of invalidity and remanded the Charter case back to the District Court. During June 2006, Charter filed a reexamination request with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. The Court has stayed the Charter case pending reexamination, and our case has been stayed pending resolution of the Charter case.
We intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a Court ultimately determines that we infringe any of the patents, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages, and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain user-friendly features that we currently offer to consumers. We are being indemnified by DISH Network for any potential liability or damages resulting from this suit relating to the period prior to the effective date of the Spin-off. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
Finisar Corporation
Finisar Corporation (“Finisar”) obtained a $100 million verdict in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas against DirecTV for patent infringement. Finisar alleged that DirecTV’s electronic program guide and other elements of its system infringe United States Patent No. 5,404,505 (the ‘505 patent).
During 2006, we and DISH Network, together with NagraStar LLC, filed a Complaint for Declaratory Judgment in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware against Finisar that asks the Court to declare that we do not infringe, and have not infringed, any valid claim of the ‘505 patent. During April 2008, the Federal Circuit

47


Table of Contents

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION Continued
reversed the judgment against DirecTV and ordered a new trial. Our case is stayed until the DirecTV action is resolved.
We intend to vigorously prosecute this case. In the event that a Court ultimately determines that we infringe this patent, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages, and/or an injunction that could require us to modify our system architecture. We are being indemnified by DISH Network for any potential liability or damages resulting from this suit relating to the period prior to the effective date of the Spin-off. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
Global Communications
During April 2007, Global Communications, Inc. (“Global”) filed a patent infringement action against us and DISH Network in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. The suit alleges infringement of United States Patent No. 6,947,702 (the ‘702 patent), which relates to satellite reception. In October 2007, the United States Patent and Trademark Office granted our request for reexamination of the ‘702 patent and issued an Office Action finding that all of the claims of the ‘702 patent were invalid. At the request of the parties, the District Court stayed the litigation until the reexamination proceeding is concluded and/or other Global patent applications issue.
During June 2009, Global filed a patent infringement action against us and DISH Network in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida. The suit alleges infringement of United States Patent No. 7,542,717 (the ‘717 patent), which relates to satellite reception.
We intend to vigorously defend these cases. In the event that a Court ultimately determines that we infringe the ‘702 patent and/or the ‘717 patent, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages, and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain user-friendly features that we currently offer to consumers. We are being indemnified by DISH Network for any potential liability or damages resulting from this suit relating to the period prior to the effective date of the Spin-off. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
Guardian Media
During December 2008, Guardian Media Technologies LTD (“Guardian”) filed suit against us, EchoStar Technologies L.L.C., DISH Network, DirecTV and several other defendants in the United States District Court for the Central District of California alleging infringement of United States Patent Nos. 4,930,158 and 4,930,160. Both patents are expired and relate to certain parental lock features.
We intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a Court ultimately determines that we infringe any of the asserted patents, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages. We are being indemnified by DISH Network for any potential liability or damages resulting from this suit relating to the period prior to the effective date of the Spin-off. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
Multimedia Patent Trust
On February 13, 2009, Multimedia Patent Trust (“MPT”) filed suit against us, DISH Network, DirecTV and several other defendants in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California alleging infringement of United States Patent Nos. 4,958,226, 5,227,878, 5,136,377, 5,500,678 and 5,563,593, which relate to video encoding, decoding and compression technology. MPT is an entity that seeks to license an acquired patent portfolio without itself practicing any of the claims recited therein.
We intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a Court ultimately determines that we infringe any of the asserted patents, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages, and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain user-friendly features that we currently offer to consumers. We are being indemnified by DISH Network for any potential liability or damages resulting from this

48


Table of Contents

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION Continued
suit relating to the period prior to the effective date of the Spin-off. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
NorthPoint Technology
On July 2, 2009, NorthPoint Technology, Ltd (“Northpoint”) filed suit against us, DISH Network, and DirecTV in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas alleging infringement of United States Patent No. 6,208,636 (“the ‘636 patent”). The ‘636 patent relates to the use of multiple low-noise block converter feedhorns, or LNBFs, which are antennas used for satellite reception.
We intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a Court ultimately determines that we infringe any of the asserted patents, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages, and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain features that we currently offer to consumers. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
Personalized Media Communications
In February 2008, Personalized Media Communications, Inc. filed suit against us, DISH Network and Motorola, Inc. in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas alleging infringement of United States Patent Nos. 4,694,490, 5,109,414, 4,965,825, 5,233,654, 5,335,277, and 5,887,243, which relate to satellite signal processing.
We intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a Court ultimately determines that we infringe any of the asserted patents, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages, and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain user-friendly features that we currently offer to consumers. We are being indemnified by DISH Network for any potential liability or damages resulting from this suit relating to the period prior to the effective date of the Spin-off. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
Technology Development Licensing
On January 22, 2009, Technology Development and Licensing LLC (“TechDev”) filed suit against us and DISH Network in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois alleging infringement of United States Patent No. 35, 952, which relates to certain favorite channel features. In July 2009, the Court granted our motion to stay the case pending two re-examination petitions before the Patent and Trademark Office.
We intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a Court ultimately determines that we infringe any of the asserted patents, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages, and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain user-friendly features that we currently offer to consumers. We are being indemnified by DISH Network for any potential liability or damages resulting from this suit relating to the period prior to the effective date of the Spin-off. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
Tivo Inc.
During January 2008, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed in part and reversed in part the April 2006 jury verdict concluding that certain of our digital video recorders, or DVRs, infringed a patent held by Tivo. In its January 2008 decision, the Federal Circuit affirmed the jury’s verdict of infringement on Tivo’s “software claims,” and upheld the award of damages from the District Court. The Federal Circuit, however, found that we did not literally infringe Tivo’s “hardware claims,” and remanded such claims back to the District Court for further proceedings. On October 6, 2008, the Supreme Court denied our petition for certiorari. As a result, DISH Network paid approximately $105 million to Tivo.
We also developed and deployed “next-generation” DVR software. This improved software was automatically downloaded to our current customers’ DVRs, and is fully operational (our “original alternative technology”). The download was completed as of April 2007. We received written legal opinions from outside counsel that concluded our original alternative technology does not infringe, literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, either the hardware or software claims of Tivo’s patent. Tivo filed a motion for contempt alleging that we are in violation of the Court’s injunction. We opposed this motion on the grounds that the injunction did not apply to DVRs that have received our original alternative technology, that our original alternative technology does not infringe Tivo’s patent, and that we were in compliance with the injunction.
On June 2, 2009, the District Court granted Tivo’s contempt motion, finding that our original alternative technology was not more than colorably different than the products found by the jury to infringe Tivo’s patent, that the original alternative technology still infringed the software claims, and that even if the original alternative technology was “non-infringing,” the original injunction by its terms required that DISH Network disable DVR functionality in all but approximately 192,000 digital set-top boxes in the field. The District Court awarded Tivo $103 million in supplemental damages and interest for the period from September 2006 to April 2008, based on an assumed $1.25 per subscriber per month royalty rate. DISH Network posted a bond to secure that award pending appeal of the contempt order. This award does not include sanctions for contempt, which could be substantial.
On July 1, 2009, the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals granted a permanent stay of the District Court’s contempt order pending resolution of our appeal. In so doing, the Federal Circuit found, at a minimum, that we had a substantial case on the merits. The Federal Circuit set an expedited briefing schedule for the appeal with oral argument possible as early as November 2009.
The District Court held a hearing on July 28, 2009 on Tivo’s claims for contempt sanctions, but has ordered that enforcement of any sanctions award will be stayed pending our appeal of the contempt order. Tivo is seeking up to $975 million in contempt sanctions for the period from April 2008 to June 2009 based on, among other things, profits Tivo alleges DISH Network made from subscribers using DVRs. We opposed Tivo’s request arguing, among other things, that sanctions are inappropriate because we made good faith efforts to comply with the Court’s injunction. We also challenged Tivo’s calculation of profits.

49


Table of Contents

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION Continued
On August 3, 2009, the Patent and Trademark Office (the “PTO”) issued an initial office action rejecting the software claims of the ‘389 patent as being invalid in light of two prior patents. These are the same software claims that we were found to have infringed and which underlie the contempt ruling now pending on appeal. We believe that the PTO’s conclusions are relevant to the issues on appeal as well as the pending sanctions proceedings in the District Court. The PTO’s conclusions support our position that our original alternative technology is more than colorably different than the devices found to infringe by the jury; that our original alternative technology does not infringe; and that we acted in good faith to design around Tivo’s patent.
In light of the District Court’s finding of contempt, and its description of the manner in which it believes our original alternative technology infringed the ‘389 patent, we are also developing and testing potential new alternative technology in an engineering environment.
If we are unsuccessful in overturning the District Court’s ruling on Tivo’s motion for contempt, we are not successful in developing and deploying potential new alternative technology and we are unable to reach a license agreement with Tivo on reasonable terms, we would be required to cease distribution of digital set-top boxes with DVR functionality. In that event, our sales of digital set-top boxes to DISH Network and others would likely significantly decrease and could even potentially cease for a period of time. Furthermore, the inability to offer DVR functionality would place us at a significant disadvantage to our competitors and make it even more difficult for us to penetrate new markets for digital set-top boxes. The adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations if the District Court’s contempt order is upheld is likely to be significant.
If we are successful in overturning the District Court’s ruling on Tivo’s motion for contempt, but unsuccessful in defending against any subsequent claim that our original alternative technology or any potential new alternative technology infringes Tivo’s patent, we could be prohibited from distributing DVRs. In that event we would be at a significant disadvantage to our competitors who could continue offering DVR functionality and the adverse effect on our business could be material.
Because both we and DISH Network are defendants in the Tivo lawsuit, we and DISH Network are jointly and severally liable to Tivo for any final damages and sanctions that may be awarded by the Court. DISH Network has agreed that it is obligated under the agreements entered into in connection with the Spin-off to indemnify us for substantially all liability arising from this lawsuit. We have agreed to contribute an amount equal to our $5 million intellectual property liability limit under the Receiver Agreement. We and DISH Network have further agreed that our $5 million contribution would not exhaust our liability to DISH Network for other intellectual property claims that may arise under the Receiver Agreement. Therefore, during the three months ended June 30, 2009, we recorded a charge included in “General and administrative expenses — DISH Network” on our Condensed Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) of $5 million to reflect this contribution. We and DISH Network also agreed that we would each be entitled to joint ownership of, and a cross-license to use, any intellectual property developed in connection with any potential new alternative technology.
Because we are jointly and severally liable with DISH Network, to the extent that DISH Network does not or is unable to pay any damages or sanctions arising from this lawsuit, we would then be liable for any portion of these damages and sanctions not paid by DISH Network. Any amounts that DISH Network may be required to pay could impair its ability to pay us and also negatively impact our future liquidity. If we become liable for any portion of these damages or sanctions, we may be required to raise additional capital at a time and in circumstances in which we would normally not raise capital. Therefore, any capital we raise may be on terms that are unfavorable to us, which might adversely affect our financial position and results of operations and might also impair our ability to raise capital on acceptable terms in the future to fund our own operations and initiatives.

50


Table of Contents

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION Continued
Other
In addition to the above actions, we are subject to various other legal proceedings and claims which arise in the ordinary course of business. In our opinion, the amount of ultimate liability with respect to any of these actions is unlikely to materially affect our financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

51


Table of Contents

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION Continued
Item 1A. RISK FACTORS
Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 includes a detailed discussion of our risk factors. The information presented below updates, and should be read in conjunction with, the risk factors and information disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2008.
If we are unsuccessful in overturning the District Court’s ruling on Tivo’s motion for contempt, we are not successful in developing and deploying potential new alternative technology and we are unable to reach a license agreement with Tivo on reasonable terms, we would be subject to substantial liability and would be prohibited from offering DVR functionality that would in turn place us at a significant disadvantage to our competitors and significantly decrease sales of digital set-top boxes to DISH Network and others.
In June 2009, the U.S. District Court granted Tivo’s motion for contempt finding that our next-generation DVRs continue to infringe Tivo’s intellectual property and awarded Tivo an additional $103 million dollars in supplemental damages.
If we are unsuccessful in overturning the District Court’s ruling on Tivo’s motion for contempt, we are not successful in developing and deploying potential new alternative technology and we are unable to reach a license agreement with Tivo on reasonable terms, we would be required to cease distribution of digital set-top boxes with DVR functionality. In that event, our sales of digital set-top boxes to DISH Network and others would likely significantly decrease and could even potentially cease for a period of time. Furthermore, the inability to offer DVR functionality would place us at a significant disadvantage to our competitors and make it even more difficult for us to penetrate new markets for digital set-top boxes. The adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations if the District Court’s contempt order is upheld is likely to be significant.
If we are successful in overturning the District Court’s ruling on Tivo’s motion for contempt, but unsuccessful in defending against any subsequent claim that our original alternative technology or any potential new alternative technology infringes Tivo’s patent, we could be prohibited from distributing DVRs. In that event we would be at a significant disadvantage to our competitors who could continue offering DVR functionality and the adverse effect on our business could be material.
Because both we and DISH Network are defendants in the Tivo lawsuit, we and DISH Network are jointly and severally liable to Tivo for any final damages and sanctions that may be awarded by the Court. DISH Network has agreed that it is obligated under the agreements entered into in connection with the Spin-off to indemnify us for substantially all liability arising from this lawsuit. We have agreed to contribute an amount equal to our $5 million intellectual property liability limit under the Receiver Agreement. We and DISH Network have further agreed that our $5 million contribution would not exhaust our liability to DISH Network for other intellectual property claims that may arise under the Receiver Agreement. Therefore, during the three months ended June 30, 2009, we recorded a charge included in “General and administrative expenses — DISH Network” on our Condensed Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) of $5 million to reflect this contribution. We and DISH Network also agreed that we would each be entitled to joint ownership of, and a cross-license to use, any intellectual property developed in connection with any potential new alternative technology.
Because we are jointly and severally liable with DISH Network, to the extent that DISH Network does not or is unable to pay any damages or sanctions arising from this lawsuit, we would then be liable for any portion of these damages and sanctions not paid by DISH Network. Any amounts that DISH Network may be required to pay could impair its ability to pay us and also negatively impact our future liquidity. If we become liable for any portion of these damages or sanctions, we may be required to raise additional capital at a time and in circumstances in which we would normally not raise capital. Therefore, any capital we raise may be on terms that are unfavorable to us, which might adversely affect our financial position and results of operations and might also impair our ability to raise capital on acceptable terms in the future to fund our own operations and initiatives.
The average selling price and gross margins of our digital set-top boxes has been decreasing and may decrease even further, which could negatively impact our financial position and results of operations.
The average selling price and gross margins of our digital set-top boxes has been decreasing and may decrease even further due to, among other things, an increase in the sales of lower-priced digital set top boxes to DISH Network and increased pricing pressure on our average selling prices, including sales to Bell TV as a result of the February 6, 2009 amendment to our agreement with Bell TV. Furthermore, our ability to increase the average selling prices of our digital set-top boxes is limited and our average selling price may decrease even further in response to competitive pricing pressures, new product introductions by us or our competitors or other factors. If we are unable to increase or at least maintain the average selling prices of our digital set-top boxes, or if such selling prices further

52


Table of Contents

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION Continued
decline, and we are unable to respond in a timely manner by developing and introducing new products and continually reducing our product costs, our revenues and gross margin may be negatively affected, which will harm our financial position and results of operations.
Item 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The following table provides information regarding repurchases of our Class A common stock from April 1, 2009 through June 30, 2009.
                                 
                    Total Number of     Maximum Approximate  
    Total             Shares Purchased as     Dollar Value of Shares  
    Number of     Average     Part of Publicly     that May Yet be  
    Shares     Price Paid     Announced Plans or     Purchased Under the  
Period   Purchased     per Share     Programs     Plans or Programs (a)  
                            (In thousands)  
April 1 - April 30, 2009
        $           $ 470,114  
May 1 - May 31, 2009
        $           $ 470,114  
June 1 - June 30, 2009
    489,183     $ 15.34       489,183     $ 462,612  
 
                       
Total
    489,183               489,183     $ 462,612  
 
                       
 
(a)   In November 2007, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $1.0 billion of our Class A common stock during 2008. Effective November 2008, our board of directors extended the plan and authorized a reduction in the maximum dollar value of shares that may be repurchased, such that we are currently authorized to repurchase up to $500 million of our outstanding Class A common stock through and including December 31, 2009, subject to a limitation to purchase no more than 20% of our outstanding common stock. Purchases under the program may be made through open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions, or Rule 10b5-1 trading plans, subject to market conditions and other factors. We may elect not to purchase all of the shares authorized for repurchase under this program and we may also enter into additional share repurchase programs authorized by our Board of Directors.

53


Table of Contents

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION Continued
Item 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
The following matters were voted upon at the annual meeting of our shareholders held on May 11, 2009:
  a.   The election of Joseph P. Clayton, R. Stanton Dodge, Michael T. Dugan, Charles W. Ergen, David K. Moskowitz, Tom A. Ortolf, and C. Michael Schroeder as directors to serve until the 2010 annual meeting of shareholders;
 
  b.   Ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2009;
 
  c.   Approval to amend and restate our Employee Stock Purchase Plan; and
 
  d.   Approval of amendments to existing equity plans to allow for stock award exchange programs.
All matters voted on at the annual meeting were approved. The voting results were as follows:
                                 
    Votes    
            Against/           Broker
    For   Withheld   Abstain   Non-Votes
Election as directors:
                               
Joseph P. Clayton
    505,117,587       3,443,434              
R. Stanton Dodge
    496,594,546       11,966,475              
Michael T. Dugan
    496,858,585       11,702,436              
Charles W. Ergen
    502,118,805       6,442,216              
David K. Moskowitz
    496,596,350       11,964,671              
Tom A. Ortolf
    505,093,090       3,467,931              
C. Michael Schroeder
    505,096,251       3,464,770              
 
                               
Ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2009
    508,026,393       57,226       477,402        
 
                               
Approval to amend and restate our Employee Stock Purchase Plan
    500,742,401       3,346,425       585,418       3,886,777  
 
                               
Approval of amendments to existing equity plans to allow for stock award exchange programs
    488,777,173       19,191,552       592,296        
Item 5. OTHER INFORMATION
Satellite Procurement Agreement. We entered into a satellite procurement agreement pursuant to which DISH Network has the right, but not the obligation, to engage us to manage the process of procuring new satellite capacity for DISH Network. The satellite procurement agreement has a two year term expiring on January 1, 2010. The fees for the services to be provided under the satellite procurement agreement are equal to our cost plus a fixed margin, which varies depending on the nature of the services provided. DISH Network may terminate the satellite procurement agreement for any reason upon sixty days prior written notice. We and DISH Network have agreed that following January 1, 2010 DISH Network will continue to have the right, but not the obligation, to engage us to manage the process of procuring new satellite capacity for DISH Network for a one-year period and for successive one-year periods thereafter; however, DISH Network may terminate these services upon sixty days prior written notice.

Services Agreement. We entered into a services agreement pursuant to which DISH Network has the right, but not the obligation, to receive logistics, procurement and quality assurance services from us. The fees for the services provided under this services agreement are equal to our cost plus a fixed margin, which varies depending on the nature of the services provided. This agreement has a term of two years ending on January 1, 2010. DISH Network may terminate the services agreement with respect to a particular service for any reason upon sixty days prior written notice. We and DISH Network have agreed that following January 1, 2010 DISH Network will continue to have the right, but not the obligation, to receive from us the services previously provided under the services agreement for a one-year period and for successive one-year periods thereafter; however, DISH Network may terminate these services upon sixty days prior written notice.

Transition Services Agreement. We entered into a transition services agreement with DISH Network pursuant to which we have the right, but not the obligation, to receive the following services from DISH Network: finance, information technology, benefits administration, travel and event coordination, human resources, human resources development (training), program management, internal audit, legal, accounting and tax, and other support services. The fees for the services provided under the transition services agreement are equal to our cost plus a fixed margin, which varies depending on the nature of the services provided. The transition services agreement has a term of two years, ending on January 1, 2010. We may terminate the transition services agreement with respect to a particular service for any reason upon thirty days prior written notice. We and DISH Network have agreed that following January 1, 2010 we will continue to have the right, but not the obligation, to receive certain of the services previously provided by DISH Network under the transition services agreement for a one-year period and for successive one-year periods thereafter; however, we may terminate these services upon sixty days prior written notice.

Tivo. Because both we and DISH Network are defendants in the Tivo lawsuit, we and DISH Network are jointly and severally liable to Tivo for any final damages and sanctions that may be awarded by the Court. DISH Network has agreed that it is obligated under the agreements entered into in connection with the Spin-off to indemnify us for substantially all liability arising from this lawsuit. We have agreed to contribute an amount equal to our $5 million intellectual property liability limit under the Receiver Agreement. We and DISH Network have further agreed that our $5 million contribution would not exhaust our liability to DISH Network for other intellectual property claims that may arise under the Receiver Agreement. Therefore, during the three months ended June 30, 2009, we recorded a charge included in “General and administrative expenses - DISH Network” on our Condensed Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) of $5 million to reflect this contribution. We and DISH Network also agreed that we would each be entitled to joint ownership of, and a cross-license to use, any intellectual property developed in connection with any potential new alternative technology.

54


Table of Contents

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION Continued
Item 6. EXHIBITS
(a) Exhibits.
     
10.1*
  Amended and Restated EchoStar Corporation 2008 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (incorporated by reference to the Definitive Proxy Statement on Form 14 filed on March 31, 2009, Commission File No. 001-33807).
 
   
10.2*
  Amended and Restated EchoStar Corporation 2008 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to the Definitive Proxy Statement on Form 14 filed on March 31, 2009, Commission File No. 001-33807).
 
   
10.3*
  Amended and Restated EchoStar Corporation 2008 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to the Definitive Proxy Statement on Form 14 filed on March 31, 2009, Commission File No. 001-33807).
 
   
31.1o
  Section 302 Certification by Chairman and Chief Executive Officer.
 
   
31.2o
  Section 302 Certification by Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.
 
   
32.1o
  Section 906 Certification by Chairman and Chief Executive Officer.
 
   
32.2o
  Section 906 Certification by Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.
 
o   Filed herewith.
 
*   Incorporated by reference.

55


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
         
  ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
 
 
  By:   /s/ Charles W. Ergen    
    Charles W. Ergen   
    Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
(Duly Authorized Officer) 
 
 
     
  By:   /s/ Bernard L. Han    
    Bernard L. Han   
    Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) 
 
 
Date: August 10, 2009

56