e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 1-13277
CNA SURETY CORPORATION
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its Charter)
|
|
|
DELAWARE
|
|
36-4144905 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
333 S. WABASH AVE., CHICAGO, ILLINOIS
|
|
60604 |
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(312) 822-5000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller Reporting Company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). o Yes þ No
APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY
PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PRECEDING FIVE YEARS:
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be
filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the
distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court. o Yes o No
APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date:
44,267,471 shares of Common Stock, $.01 par value as of October 22, 2009.
CNA SURETY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
Item 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
47 |
|
EX-31.1 |
EX-31.2 |
EX-32.1 |
EX-32.2 |
2
CNA SURETY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands, except per |
|
|
|
share data) |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Invested assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed income securities, at fair value (amortized cost: $1,164,709 and $1,041,816) |
|
$ |
1,229,282 |
|
|
$ |
1,034,646 |
|
Equity securities, at fair value (cost: $1,379 and $1,231) |
|
|
1,553 |
|
|
|
1,231 |
|
Short-term investments, at cost (approximates fair value) |
|
|
70,472 |
|
|
|
80,606 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total invested assets |
|
|
1,301,307 |
|
|
|
1,116,483 |
|
Cash |
|
|
7,890 |
|
|
|
9,596 |
|
Deferred policy acquisition costs |
|
|
105,081 |
|
|
|
102,092 |
|
Insurance receivables: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums, including $9,657 and $14,303 from affiliates, (net of allowance for doubtful
accounts: $1,336 and $1,307) |
|
|
43,556 |
|
|
|
36,948 |
|
Reinsurance, including $768 and $46,122 from affiliates |
|
|
48,530 |
|
|
|
91,452 |
|
Deposit with affiliated ceding company |
|
|
27,368 |
|
|
|
29,693 |
|
Goodwill and other intangible assets (net of accumulated amortization: $25,523 and $25,523) |
|
|
138,785 |
|
|
|
138,785 |
|
Property and equipment, at cost (less accumulated depreciation and amortization: $37,433
and $33,506) |
|
|
18,592 |
|
|
|
24,378 |
|
Prepaid reinsurance premiums (including $0 and $105 from affiliates) |
|
|
266 |
|
|
|
420 |
|
Accrued investment income |
|
|
14,383 |
|
|
|
13,464 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
3,205 |
|
|
|
2,208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,708,963 |
|
|
$ |
1,565,519 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserves: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
$ |
428,286 |
|
|
$ |
428,724 |
|
Unearned premiums |
|
|
262,616 |
|
|
|
258,824 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total reserves |
|
|
690,902 |
|
|
|
687,548 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
30,930 |
|
|
|
30,892 |
|
Deferred income taxes, net |
|
|
34,282 |
|
|
|
9,647 |
|
Reinsurance and other payables to affiliates |
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
1,680 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
14,305 |
|
|
|
20,056 |
|
Liability for postretirement benefits |
|
|
10,443 |
|
|
|
9,283 |
|
Payable for securities purchased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,398 |
|
Federal income tax payable |
|
|
1,621 |
|
|
|
1,581 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
41,628 |
|
|
|
29,139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
824,201 |
|
|
|
798,224 |
|
Commitments and contingencies (See Notes 3, 5, & 8) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $.01 per share, 100,000 shares authorized; 45,634 shares issued and
44,267 shares outstanding at September 30, 2009 and 45,544 shares issued and 44,168 shares
outstanding at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
456 |
|
|
|
455 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
278,849 |
|
|
|
276,255 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
578,199 |
|
|
|
509,644 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
41,929 |
|
|
|
(4,286 |
) |
Treasury stock, 1,367 and 1,376 shares, at cost |
|
|
(14,671 |
) |
|
|
(14,773 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
884,762 |
|
|
|
767,295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
1,708,963 |
|
|
$ |
1,565,519 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
CNA SURETY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Amount in thousands, except per share data) |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earned premium |
|
$ |
109,703 |
|
|
$ |
109,696 |
|
|
$ |
316,549 |
|
|
$ |
320,814 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
12,536 |
|
|
|
11,781 |
|
|
|
37,359 |
|
|
|
35,292 |
|
Net realized investment gains (losses): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other-than-temporary impairment losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(178 |
) |
|
|
(1,870 |
) |
|
|
(178 |
) |
Portion of other-than-temporary impairment losses
recognized in other comprehensive income (before
taxes) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,708 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net impairment losses recognized in earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(178 |
) |
|
|
(162 |
) |
|
|
(178 |
) |
Net realized investment gains (losses), excluding
impairment losses on available-for-sale securities |
|
|
1,056 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1,105 |
|
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net realized investment gains (losses) |
|
|
1,056 |
|
|
|
(177 |
) |
|
|
943 |
|
|
|
(207 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
123,295 |
|
|
|
121,300 |
|
|
|
354,851 |
|
|
|
355,899 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
24,429 |
|
|
|
8,745 |
|
|
|
84,992 |
|
|
|
62,103 |
|
Net commissions, brokerage and other underwriting expenses |
|
|
62,169 |
|
|
|
61,694 |
|
|
|
172,364 |
|
|
|
174,806 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
319 |
|
|
|
508 |
|
|
|
1,096 |
|
|
|
1,659 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
86,917 |
|
|
|
70,947 |
|
|
|
258,452 |
|
|
|
238,568 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
36,378 |
|
|
|
50,353 |
|
|
|
96,399 |
|
|
|
117,331 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
10,854 |
|
|
|
16,020 |
|
|
|
27,844 |
|
|
|
36,046 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
25,524 |
|
|
$ |
34,333 |
|
|
$ |
68,555 |
|
|
$ |
81,285 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share |
|
$ |
0.58 |
|
|
$ |
0.78 |
|
|
$ |
1.55 |
|
|
$ |
1.84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share, assuming dilution |
|
$ |
0.57 |
|
|
$ |
0.78 |
|
|
$ |
1.54 |
|
|
$ |
1.84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
44,263 |
|
|
|
44,138 |
|
|
|
44,240 |
|
|
|
44,139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding, assuming dilution |
|
|
44,411 |
|
|
|
44,264 |
|
|
|
44,397 |
|
|
|
44,258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
CNA SURETY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Common |
|
|
Paid-in |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Stockholders |
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Income (Loss) |
|
|
At Cost |
|
|
Equity |
|
Balance, January 1, 2008 |
|
|
44,121 |
|
|
$ |
455 |
|
|
$ |
274,069 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
399,241 |
|
|
$ |
8,800 |
|
|
$ |
(14,860 |
) |
|
$ |
667,705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
81,285 |
|
|
|
81,285 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
81,285 |
|
Other comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in unrealized gains
(losses) on securities, after
income tax benefit of $15,779
(net of reclassification
adjustment of $8, after
income tax expense of $5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29,304 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29,304 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29,304 |
) |
Adjustment to recognize
re-measurement of accumulated
postretirement benefit
obligations, after income tax
expense of $778 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
828 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
828 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
828 |
|
Net change related to
postretirement benefits, after
income tax benefit of $42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(79 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(79 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(79 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
52,730 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,327 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,327 |
|
Stock options exercised and other |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
382 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
469 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, September 30, 2008 |
|
|
44,159 |
|
|
$ |
455 |
|
|
$ |
275,778 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
480,526 |
|
|
$ |
(19,755 |
) |
|
$ |
(14,773 |
) |
|
$ |
722,231 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, January 1, 2009 |
|
|
44,168 |
|
|
$ |
455 |
|
|
$ |
276,255 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
509,644 |
|
|
$ |
(4,286 |
) |
|
$ |
(14,773 |
) |
|
$ |
767,295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
68,555 |
|
|
|
68,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,555 |
|
Other comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in unrealized gains
(losses) on securities, after
income tax expense of $25,317
(net of reclassification
adjustment of ($2,550), after
income tax benefit of $1,373) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,016 |
|
Other-than-temporary
impairment losses not
recognized in the Condensed
Consolidated Statements of
Income, after income tax
benefit of $146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(270 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(270 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(270 |
) |
Adjustment to recognize
re-measurement of accumulated
postretirement benefit
obligations, after income tax
benefit of $150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(438 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(438 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(438 |
) |
Net change related to
postretirement benefits, after
income tax benefit of $28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(93 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(93 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(93 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
114,770 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,453 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,453 |
|
Stock options exercised and other |
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1,141 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
1,244 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, September 30, 2009 |
|
|
44,267 |
|
|
$ |
456 |
|
|
$ |
278,849 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
578,199 |
|
|
$ |
41,929 |
|
|
$ |
(14,671 |
) |
|
$ |
884,762 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial
statements.
5
CNA SURETY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
68,555 |
|
|
$ |
81,285 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for doubtful accounts |
|
|
543 |
|
|
|
(38 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
4,516 |
|
|
|
4,238 |
|
Amortization of bond premium, net |
|
|
3,534 |
|
|
|
2,007 |
|
Loss on disposal or impairment of property and equipment |
|
|
4,921 |
|
|
|
1,130 |
|
Net realized investment (gains) losses |
|
|
(943 |
) |
|
|
207 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
1,453 |
|
|
|
1,327 |
|
Changes in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance receivables |
|
|
35,771 |
|
|
|
23,965 |
|
Reserve for unearned premiums |
|
|
3,792 |
|
|
|
12,621 |
|
Reserve for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
(438 |
) |
|
|
(48,281 |
) |
Deposit with affiliated ceding company |
|
|
2,325 |
|
|
|
3,792 |
|
Deferred policy acquisition costs |
|
|
(2,989 |
) |
|
|
(2,681 |
) |
Deferred income taxes, net |
|
|
(449 |
) |
|
|
(202 |
) |
Reinsurance and other payables to affiliates |
|
|
(1,590 |
) |
|
|
(183 |
) |
Prepaid reinsurance premiums |
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
191 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
(5,751 |
) |
|
|
(1,301 |
) |
Other assets and liabilities |
|
|
(3,702 |
) |
|
|
7,167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
109,702 |
|
|
|
85,244 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed income securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases |
|
|
(260,383 |
) |
|
|
(99,751 |
) |
Maturities |
|
|
84,747 |
|
|
|
25,602 |
|
Sales |
|
|
50,115 |
|
|
|
24,402 |
|
Purchases of equity securities |
|
|
(715 |
) |
|
|
(370 |
) |
Proceeds from the sale of equity securities |
|
|
528 |
|
|
|
460 |
|
Changes in short-term investments |
|
|
10,209 |
|
|
|
(32,830 |
) |
Purchases of property and equipment, net |
|
|
(3,612 |
) |
|
|
(4,882 |
) |
Changes in receivables/payables for securities sold/purchased |
|
|
(8,398 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) investing activities |
|
|
(127,509 |
) |
|
|
(87,169 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee stock option exercises and other |
|
|
1,244 |
|
|
|
469 |
|
Investment custody account bank overdraft |
|
|
14,857 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
16,101 |
|
|
|
469 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in cash |
|
|
(1,706 |
) |
|
|
(1,456 |
) |
Cash at beginning of period |
|
|
9,596 |
|
|
|
10,230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at end of period |
|
$ |
7,890 |
|
|
$ |
8,774 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
$ |
1,126 |
|
|
$ |
1,665 |
|
Income taxes |
|
$ |
28,059 |
|
|
$ |
27,741 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
CNA SURETY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2009
(UNAUDITED)
1. Significant Accounting Policies
Formation of CNA Surety Corporation and Merger
In December 1996, CNA Financial Corporation (CNAF) and Capsure Holdings Corp. (Capsure)
agreed to merge (the Merger) the surety business of CNAF with Capsures insurance subsidiaries,
Western Surety Company (Western Surety), Surety Bonding Company of America (Surety Bonding) and
Universal Surety of America (Universal Surety), into CNA Surety Corporation (CNA Surety or the
Company). CNAF, through its operating subsidiaries, writes multiple lines of property and
casualty insurance, including surety business that is reinsured by Western Surety. The principal
operating subsidiaries of CNAF that wrote the surety line of business for their own account prior
to the Merger were Continental Casualty Company and its property and casualty affiliates
(collectively, CCC) and The Continental Insurance Company and its property and casualty
affiliates (collectively, CIC). Through its insurance subsidiaries, CNAF owns approximately 62%
of the outstanding common stock of CNA Surety. Loews Corporation (Loews) owns approximately 90%
of the outstanding common stock of CNAF.
Principles of Consolidation
The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of CNA Surety and all
majority-owned subsidiaries.
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles (GAAP) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date
of financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Basis of Presentation
These unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with
the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto included in the Companys 2008 Form 10-K.
Certain financial information that is included in annual financial statements prepared in
accordance with GAAP is not required for interim reporting and has been condensed or omitted. The
accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements reflect, in the opinion of
management, all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the interim financial statements.
All such adjustments are of a normal and recurring nature. The financial results for interim
periods may not be indicative of financial results for a full year.
Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per common share is computed by dividing income available to common
stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted
earnings per common share is computed based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding
plus the dilutive effect of common stock equivalents which is computed using the treasury stock
method.
7
The computation of earnings per common share is as follows (amounts in thousands, except for
per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
25,524 |
|
|
$ |
34,333 |
|
|
$ |
68,555 |
|
|
$ |
81,285 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
44,254 |
|
|
|
44,132 |
|
|
|
44,168 |
|
|
|
44,121 |
|
Weighted average shares of options exercised and additional stock issuance |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
44,263 |
|
|
|
44,138 |
|
|
|
44,240 |
|
|
|
44,139 |
|
Effect of dilutive options |
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total weighted average shares outstanding, assuming dilution |
|
|
44,411 |
|
|
|
44,264 |
|
|
|
44,397 |
|
|
|
44,258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.58 |
|
|
$ |
0.78 |
|
|
$ |
1.55 |
|
|
$ |
1.84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share, assuming dilution |
|
$ |
0.57 |
|
|
$ |
0.78 |
|
|
$ |
1.54 |
|
|
$ |
1.84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No adjustments were made to reported net income in the computation of earnings per share.
Options to purchase shares of common stock of 0.8 million and 0.6 million were excluded from the
calculation of diluted earnings per share for both the three months and nine months ended September
30, 2009 and September 30, 2008, respectively, because the exercise price of these options was
greater than the average market price of CNA Suretys common stock during the respective periods.
Subsequent Events
The Company has evaluated subsequent events since the date of these condensed consolidated
financial statements through the issuance date of October 30, 2009.
Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued guidance related to
noncontrolling interests in consolidated financial statements. This guidance establishes accounting
and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation
of a subsidiary and clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary is an ownership
interest in the consolidated entity that should be reported as equity in the consolidated financial
statements. This noncontrolling interest guidance requires consolidated net income to be reported
at amounts that include the amounts attributable to both the parent and the noncontrolling interest
and requires disclosure, on the face of the consolidated statement of income, of the amounts of
consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest. The guidance
also establishes a single method of accounting for changes in a parents ownership interest in a
subsidiary that do not result in deconsolidation and clarifies that all of those transactions are
equity transactions if the parent retains its controlling financial interest in the subsidiary.
Finally, the guidance requires expanded disclosures in the consolidated financial statements that
clearly identify and distinguish between the interests of the parent and the interests of
the noncontrolling owners of a subsidiary. The guidance was effective for the Company on January 1,
2009. The adoption had no impact on the Companys financial condition or results of operations.
In February 2008, the FASB issued guidance which delays the effective date for disclosures
related to nonrecurring fair value measurements of nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities
until fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. The Company adopted this guidance on January
1, 2009. The adoption had no impact on the Companys financial condition or results of operations.
In March 2008, the FASB issued guidance which requires enhanced disclosures about how and why
an entity uses derivative instruments, how derivative instruments and related hedged items are
accounted for and how derivative instruments and related hedge items affect an entitys financial
position, financial performance and cash flows. This derivative guidance also requires the
disclosure of the fair values of derivative instruments and their gains and losses in a tabular
format and requires cross-referencing within the footnotes of important information about
derivative instruments. The Company adopted this guidance on January 1, 2009. The adoption had no
impact on the Companys required disclosures.
In September 2008, the FASB issued guidance which requires disclosures by sellers of credit
derivatives and requires additional disclosure about the current status of the risk of a guarantee.
This guidance was effective for the Company on January 1, 2009. The adoption had no impact on the
Companys required disclosures.
8
In December 2008, the FASB issued guidance which requires employers to make additional
disclosures regarding postretirement benefit plan assets and to provide information regarding the
following: how investment allocation decisions are made, including the factors that are pertinent
to an understanding of investment policies and procedures; the major categories of plan assets; the
inputs and valuation techniques used to measure the fair value of plan assets; the effect of fair
value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) on changes in plan assets for
the period; and significant concentrations of risk within plan assets. The disclosures are
required for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2009 and were effective for the Company on
January 1, 2009. The adoption had no impact on the Companys disclosures as the Companys
postretirement benefit plans have no plan assets.
In April 2009, the FASB issued guidance which requires entities to assess whether certain
factors exist that indicate that the volume and level of market activity for an asset or liability
have decreased or that transactions are not orderly. If, after evaluating those factors, the
evidence indicates there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity in
relation to normal market activity, observed transactional values or quoted prices may not be
determinative of fair value and adjustment to the observed transactional values or quoted prices
may be necessary to estimate fair value. This guidance was effective for interim and annual periods
ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption had no impact on the Companys financial condition or
results of operations.
In April 2009, the FASB issued guidance which amends the criteria for the recognition of
other-than-temporary impairments (OTTI) for debt securities and requires that credit losses be
recognized in earnings and losses resulting from factors other than credit of the issuer be
recognized in other comprehensive income. Prior to adoption, all OTTI were recorded in earnings in
the period of recognition. This guidance also expands and increases the frequency of existing
disclosures. This guidance was effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009,
and required a cumulative effect adjustment of initial application as an adjustment to the opening
balance of retained earnings with a corresponding adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive
income. The adoption had no cumulative effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained
earnings or accumulated other comprehensive income as the Company determined that previously
recorded OTTI on fixed income securities were credit-related and would have been recognized through
earnings as required. The Company records OTTI losses in accordance with this guidance.
In April 2009, the FASB issued guidance requiring disclosures about fair value of financial
instruments in interim as well as annual financial statements. This guidance was effective for
interim and fiscal periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption had no impact on the Companys
financial condition or results of operations. The Company has complied with the interim disclosure
requirements in Note 4, Fair Value of Financial Instruments.
In May 2009, the FASB issued guidance on the recognition and disclosure of events that occur
after the balance sheet date, but before financial statements are issued or are available to be
issued. This guidance was effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009 and
requires the disclosure of the date through which an entity has evaluated subsequent events and
whether that date represents the date the financial statements were issued or were available to be
issued. This guidance does not change previous guidance regarding the recognition or disclosure of
subsequent events, other than the additional requirement regarding the date through which
subsequent events have been considered. The Company has disclosed the date through which subsequent
events are evaluated.
In June 2009, the FASB announced that the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (the
Codification) will become the source of authoritative U.S. GAAP recognized by the FASB to be
applied by nongovernmental entities. The Codification supersedes all then-existing accounting and
reporting standards that are not standards of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). All
other non-grandfathered non-SEC accounting literature not included in the Codification will become
non-authoritative. This guidance is effective for financial statements issued for interim and
annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The adoption did not have an impact on the
Companys financial condition or results of operations.
Pending Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2009, the FASB issued guidance which removes the concept of a qualifying
special-purpose entity and eliminates it from exceptions under the guidance for consolidation of
variable interest entities. It also modifies the de-recognition conditions related to legal
isolation and effective control and adds additional disclosure requirements for transfers of
financial assets. This guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after November
15, 2009. The adoption is not expected to have a material impact on the Companys financial
condition or results of operations.
In June 2009, the FASB issued guidance which amends existing consolidation guidance applicable
for variable interest entities as well as requirements for determination of the primary beneficiary
of a variable interest entity, requires an ongoing assessment of whether an entity is the primary
beneficiary and requires enhanced disclosures that will provide users of financial statements
9
information regarding an enterprises involvement in a variable interest entity. This guidance is
effective for annual reporting periods beginning after November 15, 2009. The adoption is not
expected to have a material impact on the Companys financial condition or results of operations.
In August 2009, the FASB issued guidance which proposes the following clarifying guidance for
determining the fair value of a liability. If a quoted price in an active market for the identical
liability is available, it represents a Level 1 measurement. If a quoted price in an active market
for the identical liability is not available, an entity may utilize the following approaches: (a)
the quoted price of the identical liability when traded as an asset in an active market; (b) the
quoted price of the identical liability when traded as an asset in markets that are not active; (c)
the quoted price for similar liabilities or similar liabilities traded as assets in markets that
are not active; (d) another valuation technique that is consistent with the generally accepted fair
value principles (income approach or market approach). The Company does not report any of its
financial liabilities at fair value. This guidance is effective for financial statements issued for
annual periods beginning after August 2009. The adoption is not expected to have an impact on the
Companys financial condition or results of operations.
2. Investments
Major categories of net investment income were as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Investment income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed income securities |
|
$ |
12,763 |
|
|
$ |
11,407 |
|
|
$ |
37,790 |
|
|
$ |
34,211 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
367 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
1,097 |
|
Other |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment income on available-for-sale securities |
|
|
12,811 |
|
|
|
11,844 |
|
|
|
37,975 |
|
|
|
35,427 |
|
Investment income on deposit with affiliated ceding company |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
307 |
|
|
|
761 |
|
Investment expenses |
|
|
(310 |
) |
|
|
(287 |
) |
|
|
(923 |
) |
|
|
(896 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
$ |
12,536 |
|
|
$ |
11,781 |
|
|
$ |
37,359 |
|
|
$ |
35,292 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized investment gains and losses and the net change in unrealized gains and losses of
available-for-sale securities were as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Net realized investment gains (losses): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed income securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross realized investment gains |
|
$ |
1,448 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,491 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Gross realized investment losses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other-than-temporary impairment losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(116 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Realized losses from sales |
|
|
(392 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(392 |
) |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross realized investment losses |
|
|
(392 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(508 |
) |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized investment gains (losses) on fixed income securities |
|
|
1,056 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
983 |
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross realized investment gains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Gross realized investment losses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other-than-temporary impairment losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(178 |
) |
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
(178 |
) |
Realized losses from sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross realized investment losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(177 |
) |
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
(198 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized investment gains (losses) on equity securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(177 |
) |
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
(187 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized investment gains (losses) |
|
$ |
1,056 |
|
|
$ |
(177 |
) |
|
$ |
943 |
|
|
$ |
(207 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in unrealized gains (losses): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed income securities |
|
$ |
46,768 |
|
|
$ |
(27,674 |
) |
|
$ |
71,743 |
|
|
$ |
(44,977 |
) |
Equity securities |
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
(106 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net change in unrealized gains (losses) |
|
$ |
46,861 |
|
|
$ |
(27,655 |
) |
|
$ |
71,917 |
|
|
$ |
(45,083 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized gains (losses) and change in unrealized gains (losses) |
|
$ |
47,917 |
|
|
$ |
(27,832 |
) |
|
$ |
72,860 |
|
|
$ |
(45,290 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
Management believes the Company has the ability to hold all fixed income securities to
maturity. However, the Company may dispose of securities prior to their scheduled maturity due to
changes in interest rates, prepayments, tax and credit considerations,
liquidity or regulatory capital requirements or other similar factors. As a result, the
Company considers all of its fixed income securities (bonds) and equity securities as
available-for-sale, and as such, they are carried at fair value.
The amortized cost of fixed income securities is determined based on cost and the cumulative
effect of amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts using the interest method. Such
amortization and accretion are included in net investment income in the Condensed Consolidated
Statements of Income. For mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities, the Company considers
estimates of future prepayments in the calculation of the effective yield used to apply the
interest method. If a difference arises between the anticipated prepayments and the actual
prepayments, the Company recalculates the effective yield based on actual prepayments and the
currently anticipated future prepayments. The amortized costs of such securities are adjusted to
the amount that would have resulted had the recalculated effective yields been applied since the
acquisition of the securities with a corresponding charge or credit to net investment income in the
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. Prepayment estimates are based on the structural
elements of specific securities, interest rates and generally recognized prepayment speed indices.
The estimated fair value, gross unrealized gains, gross unrealized losses, other-than
temporary impairments and amortized cost of fixed income securities and the fair value, gross
unrealized gains, gross unrealized losses and cost of equity securities held by CNA Surety at
September 30, 2009, by investment category, were as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross Unrealized Losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized Cost |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Less Than |
|
|
More Than |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
or Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
12 Months |
|
|
12 Months |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
OTTI Losses(a) |
|
Fixed income securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. Government and agencies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury |
|
$ |
17,377 |
|
|
$ |
1,115 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
18,492 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
U.S. Agencies |
|
|
24,303 |
|
|
|
429 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,732 |
|
|
|
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations residential |
|
|
31,626 |
|
|
|
1,810 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,436 |
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage pass-through securities residential |
|
|
56,785 |
|
|
|
2,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions |
|
|
700,001 |
|
|
|
48,091 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,271 |
) |
|
|
745,821 |
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
292,550 |
|
|
|
13,219 |
|
|
|
(128 |
) |
|
|
(633 |
) |
|
|
305,008 |
|
|
|
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations commercial |
|
|
10,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(425 |
) |
|
|
9,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other asset-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second mortgages/home equity loans residential |
|
|
5,931 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(611 |
) |
|
|
5,320 |
|
|
|
(1,502 |
) |
Consumer credit receivables |
|
|
16,386 |
|
|
|
670 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,056 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
9,725 |
|
|
|
735 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,460 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed income securities |
|
|
1,164,709 |
|
|
|
68,641 |
|
|
|
(128 |
) |
|
|
(3,940 |
) |
|
|
1,229,282 |
|
|
$ |
(1,502 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities |
|
|
1,379 |
|
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,553 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,166,088 |
|
|
$ |
68,815 |
|
|
$ |
(128 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,940 |
) |
|
$ |
1,230,835 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The unrealized loss position of this security has improved to $0.4 million at September 30, 2009.
|
11
The estimated fair value, gross unrealized gains, gross unrealized losses and amortized
cost of fixed income securities and the fair value, gross unrealized gains, gross unrealized losses
and cost of equity securities held by CNA Surety at December 31, 2008, by investment category, were
as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross Unrealized Losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized Cost |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Less Than |
|
|
More Than |
|
|
Estimated |
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
or Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
12 Months |
|
|
12 Months |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Fixed income securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S.
Government and agencies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury |
|
$ |
33,140 |
|
|
$ |
3,519 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
36,659 |
|
U.S. Agencies |
|
|
36,476 |
|
|
|
1,116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,592 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations residential |
|
|
35,671 |
|
|
|
984 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,655 |
|
Mortgage pass-through securities residential |
|
|
72,203 |
|
|
|
1,489 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,692 |
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions |
|
|
697,305 |
|
|
|
19,730 |
|
|
|
(6,929 |
) |
|
|
(13,943 |
) |
|
|
696,163 |
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
96,048 |
|
|
|
1,711 |
|
|
|
(2,430 |
) |
|
|
(1,853 |
) |
|
|
93,476 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations commercial |
|
|
35,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,040 |
) |
|
|
(3,607 |
) |
|
|
29,378 |
|
Other asset-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second mortgages/home equity loans residential |
|
|
7,956 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(779 |
) |
|
|
(2,180 |
) |
|
|
4,997 |
|
Consumer credit receivables |
|
|
17,239 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,708 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,531 |
|
Other |
|
|
10,753 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
(273 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,503 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed income securities |
|
|
1,041,816 |
|
|
|
28,572 |
|
|
|
(14,159 |
) |
|
|
(21,583 |
) |
|
|
1,034,646 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
1,231 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,231 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,043,047 |
|
|
$ |
28,572 |
|
|
$ |
(14,159 |
) |
|
$ |
(21,583 |
) |
|
$ |
1,035,877 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A security is in an unrealized loss position, or impaired, if the fair value of the security
is less than its amortized cost or cost, which includes adjustments for accretion, amortization and
previously recorded other-than-temporary impairment losses. When a security is impaired, the
impairment is evaluated to determine whether it is temporary or other-than-temporary.
A significant judgment in the valuation of investments is the determination of when an
other-than-temporary decline in value has occurred. The Company follows a consistent and systematic
process for identifying securities that sustain other-than-temporary declines in value. The Company
has established a watch list that is reviewed by the Chief Financial Officer and one other
executive officer on at least a quarterly basis. The watch list includes individual securities that
fall below certain thresholds or that exhibit evidence of impairment indicators including, but not
limited to, a significant adverse change in the financial condition and near-term prospects of the
investment or a significant adverse change in legal factors, the business climate or credit
ratings.
When a security is placed on the watch list, it is monitored for further market value changes
and additional news related to the issuers financial condition. The focus is on objective evidence
that may influence the evaluation of impairment factors. The decision to record an
other-than-temporary impairment loss incorporates both quantitative criteria and qualitative
information.
In determining whether an equity security is other-than-temporarily impaired, the Company
considers a number of factors including, but not limited to: (a) the length of time and the extent
to which the market value has been less than book value, (b) the financial condition and near-term
prospects of the issuer, (c) the intent and ability of the Company to retain its investment for a
period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in value and (d) general market
conditions and industry or sector specific factors. Currently, the Companys equity portfolio is
comprised solely of mutual funds related to the Companys deferred compensation plan, which is an
unfunded, nonqualified deferred compensation plan for a select group of management or highly
compensated employees. Due to the nature of the plan, the Company does not assert the ability to
hold these securities until their recovery in value. As such, if any of these securities are in an
unrealized loss position, they are considered to be other-than-temporarily impaired.
For equity securities for which an other-than-temporary impairment loss has been identified,
the security is written down to fair value and the resulting losses are recognized in realized
gains/losses in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.
Fixed income securities in an unrealized loss position that the Company intends to sell, or it
more likely than not will be required to sell before recovery of amortized cost, are considered to
be other-than-temporarily impaired. These securities are written down to fair value and the
resulting losses are recognized in realized gains/losses in the Condensed Consolidated Statements
of Income.
The remaining fixed income securities in an unrealized loss position are evaluated to
determine if a credit loss exists. To determine if a credit loss exists, the Company considers a
number of factors including, but not limited to: (a) the financial condition
12
and near-term
prospects of the issuer, (b) credit ratings of the securities, (c) whether the debtor is current on
interest and principal payments, (d) the length of time and the extent to which the market value
has been less than book value and (e) general market conditions and industry or sector specific
factors.
In addition to these factors, the Company considers the results of discounted cash flow
modeling using assumptions representative of current market conditions as well as those specific to
the Companys particular security holdings. For asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities, the
focus of this analysis is on assessing the sufficiency and quality of underlying collateral and
timing of cash flows. Significant assumptions considered by the Company in its cash flow
projections include delinquency rates, probable risk of default, over collateralization and credit
support from lower level tranches. If the discounted expected cash flows for a security equal or
exceed the amortized cost of that security, no credit loss exists and the security is deemed to be
temporarily impaired.
Fixed income securities in an unrealized loss position for which management believes a credit
loss exists are considered to be other-than-temporarily impaired. For these fixed income
securities, the Company bifurcates OTTI losses into a credit component and a non-credit component.
The credit component, which represents the difference between the discounted expected cash flows
and the fixed income securitys amortized cost, is recognized in earnings. The non-credit component
is recognized in other comprehensive income and represents the difference between fair value and
the discounted cash flows that the Company expects to collect.
Based on the Companys September 30, 2009 evaluation of this quantitative criteria and
qualitative information, the Company did not record any OTTI losses in the three months ended
September 30, 2009.
In the three months ended June 30, 2009, the Company recorded OTTI losses of $1.8 million on
one asset-backed fixed income security which included a credit loss component. This security was
rated below investment grade by S&P and collateralized by sub-prime home loans. The credit
component of the loss, $0.1 million, was recognized in earnings with $1.7 million (49.3% of the
securitys amortized cost at that time) of the loss recognized in other comprehensive income.
The OTTI of fixed income securities for which only the amount related to credit losses was
recognized in net realized gains (losses) on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 are as follows (in thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
116 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Credit losses for which an OTTI loss was not previously recognized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
116 |
|
Credit losses for which an OTTI loss was previously recognized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
116 |
|
|
$ |
116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the three months ended March 31, 2009, the Company recorded other-than-temporary
impairment losses of less than $0.1 million on the equity securities that are related to the
Companys nonqualified deferred compensation plan.
During the three months ended September 30, 2008, the Company recorded other-than-temporary
impairment losses of $0.2 million on these equity securities. Other-than-temporary impairment
losses for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 were also $0.2 million as no
other-than-temporary impairments were recorded in the six months ended June 30, 2008.
The amortized cost and estimated fair value of fixed income securities, by contractual
maturity, at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 are shown below. Actual maturities may differ
from contractual maturities as borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or
without call or prepayment penalties (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Estimated Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Estimated Fair |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
Fixed income securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due within one year |
|
$ |
7,525 |
|
|
$ |
7,592 |
|
|
$ |
4,535 |
|
|
$ |
4,590 |
|
Due after one year but within five years |
|
|
305,493 |
|
|
|
320,562 |
|
|
|
216,232 |
|
|
|
222,344 |
|
Due after five years but within ten years |
|
|
428,560 |
|
|
|
459,319 |
|
|
|
345,285 |
|
|
|
355,171 |
|
Due after ten years |
|
|
292,653 |
|
|
|
306,580 |
|
|
|
296,917 |
|
|
|
281,785 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,034,231 |
|
|
|
1,094,053 |
|
|
|
862,969 |
|
|
|
863,890 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage pass-through securities,
collateralized mortgage obligations and
asset-backed securities |
|
|
130,478 |
|
|
|
135,229 |
|
|
|
178,847 |
|
|
|
170,756 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,164,709 |
|
|
$ |
1,229,282 |
|
|
$ |
1,041,816 |
|
|
$ |
1,034,646 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
The following table provides the composition of fixed income securities with an unrealized
loss at September 30, 2009 in relation to the total of all fixed income securities in an unrealized
loss position by contractual maturities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
% of |
|
|
Fair |
|
Unrealized |
Contractual Maturity |
|
Value |
|
Loss |
Due after one year through five years |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
16 |
% |
Due after five years through ten years |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Due after ten years |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
Asset-backed securities |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes for fixed income securities in an unrealized loss position at
September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the aggregate fair value and gross unrealized loss by
length of time those securities have been continuously in an unrealized loss position (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
Unrealized Loss Aging |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
Fixed income securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment grade(a): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-6 months |
|
$ |
31,910 |
|
|
$ |
84 |
|
|
$ |
109,973 |
|
|
$ |
3,095 |
|
7-12 months |
|
|
4,937 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
121,419 |
|
|
|
11,064 |
|
13-24 months |
|
|
11,630 |
|
|
|
261 |
|
|
|
81,395 |
|
|
|
12,010 |
|
Greater than 24 months |
|
|
36,917 |
|
|
|
2,099 |
|
|
|
33,450 |
|
|
|
9,573 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment grade |
|
|
85,394 |
|
|
|
2,488 |
|
|
|
346,237 |
|
|
|
35,742 |
|
Non-investment grade: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greater than 24 months |
|
|
17,700 |
|
|
|
1,580 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
103,094 |
|
|
$ |
4,068 |
|
|
$ |
346,237 |
|
|
$ |
35,742 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Investment grade is determined by using the Standard &
Poors (S&P) rating. If a security is not rated by S&P,
the Moodys Investor Services (Moodys) rating is used.
As of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, all of the
Companys fixed income securities were rated by S&P or
Moodys. |
At September 30, 2009, the Company holds 271 fixed income securities in an unrealized gain
position with a total estimated fair value of $1,126.2 million and an aggregate gross unrealized
gain of $68.6 million.
14
The following table summarizes securities in a gross unrealized loss position by investment
category and by credit rating. The table also discloses the corresponding count of securities in an
unrealized loss position and estimated fair value by category (in thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Unrealized Losses |
|
|
Estimated |
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
AAA |
|
|
AA |
|
|
A |
|
|
BBB |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Count |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Fixed income securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment grade(a): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U. S.
Government and agencies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations residential |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions |
|
|
389 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
618 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,107 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
29,887 |
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
630 |
|
|
|
761 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
43,225 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations commercial |
|
|
425 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
425 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
9,600 |
|
Other asset-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second mortgages/home equity loans residential |
|
|
195 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
195 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2,681 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment grade |
|
|
1,015 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
729 |
|
|
|
630 |
|
|
|
2,488 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
85,394 |
|
Non-investment grade: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,164 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
15,061 |
|
Other asset-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second mortgages/home equity loans residential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
416 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2,639 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-investment grade |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,580 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
17,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,015 |
|
|
$ |
114 |
|
|
$ |
729 |
|
|
$ |
630 |
|
|
$ |
4,068 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
$ |
103,094 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Securities are categorized using the S&P rating. If a security is not rated by
S&P, the Moodys rating is used. At September 30, 2009, all of the Companys fixed income
securities were rated by S&P or Moodys. |
As of September 30, 2009, the Companys fixed income securities included one U.S. Government
agency collateralized mortgage obligation backed by residential mortgages in a nominal unrealized
loss position. The Company has no current intent to sell this security, nor is it more likely than
not that it will be required to sell prior to recovery of amortized cost. The Company does not
believe this unrealized loss is indicative of a credit loss and, as such, has not recorded an OTTI
loss on this security at September 30, 2009.
The unrealized losses on the Companys investments in obligations of states and political
subdivisions are due to overall market conditions, changes in credit spreads, and to a lesser
extent, changes in interest rates. At September 30, 2009, only one of the five investment grade
securities was in an unrealized loss position exceeding 5% of the securitys amortized cost. This
security, issued by a governmental utility authority, had an unrealized loss of $0.6 million which
was 9.9% of the securitys amortized cost. The unrealized loss position of this security has
improved from 23.6% of amortized cost at June 30, 2009 and 43.6% of amortized cost at March 31,
2009. Similarly, changing market conditions resulted in a $12.6 million improvement in the
unrealized losses on the Companys investments in obligations of states and political subdivisions
compared to March 31, 2009 and an $8.6 million improvement compared to June 30, 2009. The Company
has no current intent to sell these securities, nor is it more likely than not that it will be
required to sell prior to recovery of amortized cost. The Company does not believe the unrealized
losses on these securities are indicative of credit losses and, as such, has not recorded an OTTI
loss on these securities at September 30, 2009.
During the three months ended September 30, 2009, the Companys investments in two other
obligations of states and political subdivisions, issued by governmental utility authorities, were
downgraded below investment grade due to the downgrade of the mono-line bond insurer guaranteeing a
portion of these securities. Despite the downgrades, improving market conditions during the second
and third quarters resulted in a $4.0 million improvement in the unrealized loss on these
securities compared to March 31, 2009 and a $2.2 million improvement compared to the unrealized
loss on these securities at June 30, 2009. At September 30, 2009, one of these securities had an
unrealized loss of $0.3 million, or 5.0% of its amortized cost, and the other had an unrealized
loss of $0.9 million, or 8.3% of its amortized cost. Based on the underlying fundamentals of these
securities, the Company continues to believe that all interest and principal will be paid according
to their contractual terms. The Company has no current intent to sell these securities, nor is it
more likely than not that it will be required to sell prior to recovery of amortized cost. As such,
the Company has not recorded an OTTI loss on these securities at September 30, 2009.
At September 30, 2009, only one of the Companys corporate bond investments was in an
unrealized loss position that exceeded 5% of its amortized cost. This unrealized loss, 20.9% ($0.6
million) of the securitys amortized cost, was on a security issued by a large student loan
provider. The unrealized loss position of this security was 19.6% of amortized cost at June 30,
2009. However, the
15
unrealized loss position was 47.2% of amortized cost, or $1.4 million, at March
31, 2009. Further, the overall unrealized loss position on the Companys corporate bond holdings
improved $6.0 million compared to March 31, 2009 and $1.3 million compared to June 30, 2009. The
unrealized losses on the Companys corporate bond investments are primarily attributable to
deterioration and volatility in the broader credit markets throughout 2008, and continuing in to
2009, that resulted in widening of credit spreads over risk-free rates. The Company has no current
intent to sell these securities, nor is it more likely than not that it will be required to sell
prior to recovery of amortized cost. The Company does not believe the unrealized losses on these
securities are indicative of credit losses and, as such, has not recorded any OTTI losses on these
securities at September 30, 2009.
The Company holds only two collateralized commercial mortgage-backed securities. At September
30, 2009, one of these securities had an unrealized loss of $0.1 million, or 2.0% of its amortized
cost, and the other had an unrealized loss of $0.3 million, or 6.5% of its amortized cost. The
overall unrealized loss position of these securities has continued to improve from $2.5 million at
March 31, 2009 and $1.5 million at June 30, 2009. The Company believes that these securities will
recover in value based on the current performance of the underlying collateral, the senior or
super-senior position of each of the holdings and the amount of credit support available to these
holdings. The Company has no current intent to sell these securities, nor is it more likely than
not that it will be required to sell prior to recovery of amortized cost. The Company does not
believe these unrealized losses are indicative of credit losses and, as such, has not recorded any
OTTI losses on these securities at September 30, 2009.
At September 30, 2009 the Companys exposure to sub-prime home loans is limited to two
asset-backed securities collateralized by sub-prime home loans originated prior to 2005. Both of
these securities are in an unrealized loss position. One of these securities has an estimated fair
value of $2.7 million and is in an unrealized loss position of $0.2 million, or 6.8% of its
amortized cost, at September 30, 2009. The other security, which is rated below investment grade,
was determined to be other-than-temporarily impaired at June 30, 2009. The Company recorded OTTI
losses of $0.1 million in earnings in addition to recording an unrealized loss of $1.7 million in
other comprehensive income. As previously discussed, the Company did not record any additional
credit-related loss on this security during the three months ended September 30, 2009 and the
unrealized loss position has improved to $0.4 million, or 13.6% of its adjusted amortized cost. The
Company believes the unrealized losses on these securities are primarily attributable to broader
economic conditions and liquidity concerns and are not indicative of the quality of the underlying
collateral. The Company continues to receive repayments on these securities, including $1.9 million,
or 24% of the par value outstanding at December 31, 2008,
in the first nine months of 2009. The Company has no current intent to sell these securities, nor
is it more likely than not that it will be required to sell prior to recovery of amortized cost
and, as such, has not recorded any additional OTTI losses at September 30, 2009.
Based on the current facts and circumstances discussed above for the Companys securities in
an unrealized loss position, the Company has determined that no additional OTTI losses related to
the securities in an unrealized loss position are required to be recorded at September 30, 2009.
Invested assets are exposed to various risks, such as interest rate, market and credit risks.
Due to the level of risk associated with certain of these invested assets and the level of
uncertainty related to changes in the value of these assets, it is possible that changes in risks
in the near term may significantly affect the amounts reported in the Condensed Consolidated
Balance Sheets and Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.
3. Reinsurance
The effect of reinsurance on the Companys written and earned premium was as follows (dollars
in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
Written |
|
|
Earned |
|
|
Written |
|
|
Earned |
|
Direct |
|
$ |
90,472 |
|
|
$ |
91,994 |
|
|
$ |
94,407 |
|
|
$ |
94,163 |
|
Assumed |
|
|
22,930 |
|
|
|
24,813 |
|
|
|
25,955 |
|
|
|
27,267 |
|
Ceded |
|
|
(7,041 |
) |
|
|
(7,104 |
) |
|
|
(11,557 |
) |
|
|
(11,734 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
106,361 |
|
|
$ |
109,703 |
|
|
$ |
108,805 |
|
|
$ |
109,696 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
Written |
|
|
Earned |
|
|
Written |
|
|
Earned |
|
Direct |
|
$ |
271,619 |
|
|
$ |
262,628 |
|
|
$ |
280,784 |
|
|
$ |
267,087 |
|
Assumed |
|
|
69,742 |
|
|
|
74,941 |
|
|
|
80,515 |
|
|
|
81,591 |
|
Ceded |
|
|
(20,866 |
) |
|
|
(21,020 |
) |
|
|
(27,673 |
) |
|
|
(27,864 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
320,495 |
|
|
$ |
316,549 |
|
|
$ |
333,626 |
|
|
$ |
320,814 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
Assumed premiums primarily includes surety business written or renewed, net of reinsurance, by
CCC and CIC after September 30, 1997 that is reinsured by Western Surety pursuant to reinsurance
and related agreements. Because of certain regulatory restrictions that limit the Companys ability
to write certain business on a direct basis, the Company continues to utilize the underwriting
capacity available through these agreements. The Company is in full control of all aspects of the
underwriting and claim management of the business assumed from these affiliates.
Assumed premium also includes surety business written by another affiliate, First Insurance
Company of Hawaii, Ltd. and its subsidiaries First Indemnity Insurance of Hawaii, Inc., First Fire
and Casualty Insurance of Hawaii, Inc. and First Security Insurance of Hawaii, Inc. (collectively,
FICOH). Through its insurance subsidiaries, CNAF owns approximately 50% of the outstanding common
stock of First Insurance Company of Hawaii, Ltd. Under the terms of this excess of loss agreement
that covers certain contract business, FICOH retains losses of $2 million per principal and Western
Surety assumes 80% of $5 million per principal in excess of $2 million subject to an aggregate
annual limit of $8 million. Premiums assumed by Western Surety under this agreement were less than
$0.1 million for both the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and $0.1
million for both the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
The effect of reinsurance on the Companys provision for loss and loss adjustment expenses and
the corresponding ratio to earned premium was as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Ratio |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Ratio |
|
Gross losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
$ |
28,062 |
|
|
|
24.0 |
% |
|
$ |
21 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
% |
Ceded amounts |
|
|
(3,633 |
) |
|
|
51.6 |
% |
|
|
8,724 |
|
|
|
(74.3 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
$ |
24,429 |
|
|
|
22.3 |
% |
|
$ |
8,745 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Ratio |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Ratio |
|
Gross losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
$ |
92,115 |
|
|
|
27.3 |
% |
|
$ |
70,559 |
|
|
|
20.2 |
% |
Ceded amounts |
|
|
(7,123 |
) |
|
|
33.9 |
% |
|
|
(8,456 |
) |
|
|
30.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
$ |
84,992 |
|
|
|
26.8 |
% |
|
$ |
62,103 |
|
|
|
19.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The unusual relationship in the gross and ceded amounts shown above for the three months ended
September 30, 2008 resulted from adjustments made based on actuarial reviews performed during the
three months ended September 30, 2008. The Company reduced gross reserves related to prior accident
years by approximately $33.3 million reflecting changes in estimates of incurred-but-not-reported
reserves. The corresponding change in ceded reserves was such that net reserves related to prior
accident years were reduced by $24.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008.
The Companys reinsurance program is predominantly comprised of excess of loss reinsurance
contracts that limit the Companys retention on a per principal basis. The Companys reinsurance
coverage is provided by third party reinsurers and related parties. Due to the terms and conditions
of these excess of loss treaties, reinsurers may cover some principals in one year but then exclude
these same principals in subsequent years. As a result, the Company may have exposures to these
principals that have limited or no reinsurance coverage.
2009 Third Party Reinsurance
Effective January 1, 2009, CNA Surety entered into a new excess of loss treaty (2009 Excess
of Loss Treaty) with a group of third party reinsurers on terms similar to the 2008 Excess of Loss
Treaty discussed below. Under the 2009 Excess of Loss Treaty, the Companys net retention per
principal is $15 million with a 5% co-participation in the $90 million layer of third party
reinsurance coverage above the Companys retention. The contract provides aggregate coverage of
$185 million and includes an optional extended discovery period, for an additional premium (a
percentage of the original premium based on any unexhausted aggregate limit by layer), which will
provide coverage for losses discovered beyond 2009 on bonds that were in force during 2009. The
contract also includes a provision for additional premiums of up to $13.8 million based on losses
ceded under the contract. The base annual premium for the 2009 Excess of Loss Treaty is $28.0
million. Only the large national contractor discussed below remains excluded from the 2009 Excess
of Loss Treaty.
17
2008 Third Party Reinsurance
Effective January 1, 2008, CNA Surety entered into an excess of loss treaty (2008 Excess of
Loss Treaty) with a group of third party reinsurers on terms similar to the excess of loss treaty
effective in 2007. Under the 2008 Excess of Loss Treaty, the Companys net retention per principal
remained at $10 million with a 5% co-participation in the $90 million layer of third party
reinsurance coverage above the Companys retention. The contract provided aggregate coverage of
$185 million and included an optional extended discovery period, which was not exercised. The
contract also included a provision for additional premiums of up to $26.1 million based on losses
ceded under the contract. The actual ceded premiums for the 2008 Excess of Loss Treaty were $30.4
million. Only the large national contractor discussed below was excluded from the 2008 Excess of
Loss Treaty. There were no additional premiums or loss recoveries under the 2008 Excess of Loss
Treaty as no losses were discovered to this treaty in 2008.
Related Party Reinsurance
Reinsurance agreements together with the Services and Indemnity Agreement that are described
below provide for the transfer of the surety business written by CCC and CIC to Western Surety. All
of these agreements originally were entered into on September 30, 1997 (the Merger Date): (i) the
Surety Quota Share Treaty (the Quota Share Treaty); (ii) the Aggregate Stop Loss Reinsurance
Contract (the Stop Loss Contract); and (iii) the Surety Excess of Loss Reinsurance Contract (the
Excess of Loss Contract). All of these contracts have expired. Some have been renewed on
different terms as described below.
The Services and Indemnity Agreement provides the Companys insurance subsidiaries with the
authority to perform various administrative, management, underwriting and claim functions in order
to conduct the business of CCC and CIC and to be reimbursed by CCC for services rendered. In
consideration for providing the foregoing services, CCC has agreed to pay Western Surety a
quarterly fee of $50,000. This agreement was renewed with the same terms on January 1, 2009 and
expires on December 31, 2009 and is annually renewable thereafter. Effective June 30, 2009, the
Company and CCC agreed to an addendum to this agreement that is discussed below.
Through the Quota Share Treaty, CCC and CIC transfer to Western Surety surety business written
or renewed by CCC and CIC after the Merger Date. The Quota Share Treaty was renewed on January 1,
2009 and expires on December 31, 2009 and is annually renewable thereafter. CCC and CIC transfer
the related liabilities of such business and pay to Western Surety an amount in cash equal to CCCs
and CICs net written premiums written on all such business, minus a quarterly ceding commission to
be retained by CCC and CIC equal to $50,000 plus 25% of net written premiums written on all such
business. For 2008, this resulted in an override commission on their actual direct acquisition
costs of 5.9% to CCC and CIC.
Under the terms of the Quota Share Treaty, CCC has guaranteed the loss and loss adjustment
expense reserves transferred to Western Surety as of the Merger Date by agreeing to pay Western
Surety, within 30 days following the end of each calendar quarter, the amount of any adverse
development on such reserves, as re-estimated as of the end of such calendar quarter. There was no
adverse reserve development for the period from the Merger Date through September 30, 2009.
Through the Stop Loss Contract, the Companys insurance subsidiaries were protected from
adverse loss development on certain business underwritten after the Merger Date. The Stop Loss
Contract between the insurance subsidiaries and CCC limited the insurance subsidiaries prospective
net loss ratios with respect to certain accounts and lines of insured business for three full
accident years following the Merger Date. In the event the insurance subsidiaries accident year
net loss ratio exceeds 24% in any of the accident years 1997 through 2000 on certain insured
accounts (the Loss Ratio Cap), the Stop Loss Contract requires CCC at the end of each calendar
quarter following the Merger Date, to pay to the insurance subsidiaries a dollar amount equal to
(i) the amount, if any, by which the Companys actual accident year net loss ratio exceeds the
applicable Loss Ratio Cap, multiplied by (ii) the applicable net earned premiums. In consideration
for the coverage provided by the Stop Loss Contract, the insurance subsidiaries paid to CCC an
annual premium of $20,000. The CNA Surety insurance subsidiaries have paid CCC all required annual
premiums. Through September 30, 2009, losses incurred under the Stop Loss Contract were $49.7
million. Through December 31, 2008, losses incurred under the Stop Loss Contract were $48.9
million. The increase is primarily due to unfavorable development of a large commercial claim that
was settled for less than what had been carried as an expected recovery. As a result of this
unfavorable development, the Company recorded a receivable of $0.8 million from CCC at September
30, 2009. As a result of favorable development on claims subject to the Stop Loss Contract during
the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company paid CCC $0.7 million in 2009 under the Stop Loss Contract.
At September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 these losses incurred are net of $1.6 million and $2.1
million, respectively, related to expected indemnity recoveries.
18
The Company and CCC previously participated in a $40 million excess of $60 million
reinsurance contract effective from January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2005 providing coverage
exclusively for the one large national contractor excluded from the Companys third party
reinsurance. The premium for this contract was $3.0 million plus an additional premium of $6.0
million if a loss was ceded under this contract. In the second quarter of 2005, this contract was
amended to provide unlimited coverage in excess of the $60 million retention, to increase the
premium to $7.0 million and to eliminate the additional premium provision. This treaty provides
coverage for the life of bonds either in force or written during the term of the treaty which was
from January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2005. The Company and CCC agreed by addendum to extend this
contract for twelve months beginning on January 1, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009. Additional premiums
for these periods were $0.8 million, $0.5 million, $0.2 million and less than $0.1 million,
respectively, and were based on the level of actual premiums written on bonds for the large
national contractor.
On June 30, 2009, the Company and CCC agreed by addendum to terminate the reinsurance contract
discussed in the preceding paragraph under which the Company had ceded losses and loss adjustment
expenses of $50.0 million through both June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008. Unpaid ceded losses
under this contract on June 30, 2009, prior to the termination becoming effective, were $50.0
million compared to $46.8 million at December 31, 2008. As a result of indemnification recoveries
during the first quarter of 2009, $3.2 million was returned to CCC. In addition to the termination
of this contract, the Company and CCC agreed to commute the Quota Share Treaty as regards premium
and losses for the large national contractor. The impact of this commutation was a decrease of
gross loss reserves of $51.8 million. Further, the Services and Indemnity Agreement was amended by
addendum to specifically extend the Companys authority to conduct administrative, management,
underwriting and claim functions as respects business of the large national contractor until CCCs
bonds have expired and claims have been settled or closed.
Under the terms of the agreements effecting this commutation, the Company paid CCC $1.8
million. This settlement reflects the difference between the Companys $60.0 million retention
under the reinsurance contract and $58.2 million paid by the Company for losses of the large
national contractor through June 30, 2009. These transactions had no net impact on the results of
operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
As of September 30, 2009, CNA Surety had an insurance receivable balance from CCC and CIC of
$10.5 million, including $0.8 million of reinsurance recoverables and $9.7 million of premiums
receivable, respectively. At December 31, 2008, the Companys insurance receivable balance from CCC
and CIC was $60.4 million, including $46.1 million of reinsurance recoverables and $14.3 million of
premiums receivable, respectively. CNA Surety had no reinsurance payables to CCC and CIC as of
September 30, 2009. CNA Surety had reinsurance payables to CCC and CIC of $1.2 million as of
December 31, 2008.
The Companys Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets also include a Deposit with affiliated
ceding company of $27.4 million and $29.7 million at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008,
respectively. In 2005, pursuant to an agreement with the claimant on a bond regarding certain
aspects of the claim resolution, the Company deposited $32.7 million with an affiliate to enable
the affiliate to establish a trust to fund future payments under the bond. The bond was written by
the affiliate and assumed by one of the Companys insurance subsidiaries pursuant to the Quota
Share Treaty. The Company is entitled to the interest income earned by the trust. Prior to the
establishment of the trust, the Company had fully reserved its obligation under the bond and the
claim remains fully reserved.
19
4. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a
liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The
Company uses the following fair value hierarchy in selecting inputs, with the highest priority
given to Level 1, as these are the most transparent or reliable:
|
|
|
Level 1 Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets. |
|
|
|
|
Level 2 Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for
identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived
valuations in which all significant inputs are observable in active markets. |
|
|
|
|
Level 3 Valuations derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant
inputs are unobservable. |
The Company utilizes a pricing service for the valuation of the majority of securities held.
This pricing service is an independent, third party vendor recognized to be an industry leader with
access to market information who obtains or computes fair market values from quoted market prices,
pricing for similar securities, recently executed transactions, cash flow models with yield curves
and other pricing models. For valuations obtained from the pricing service, the Company performs
due diligence to understand how the valuation was calculated or derived, focusing on the valuation
technique used and the nature of the inputs.
The following section describes the valuation methodologies used to measure different
financial instruments at fair value, including an indication of the level in the fair value
hierarchy in which the instrument is generally classified.
Fixed Income Securities
Securities valued using Level 1 inputs include highly liquid government bonds for which quoted
market prices are available. Securities using Level 2 inputs are valued using pricing for similar
securities, recently executed transactions, cash flow models with yield curves and other pricing
models utilizing observable inputs. Most fixed income securities are valued using Level 2 inputs.
Level 2 includes corporate bonds, municipal bonds, asset-backed securities and mortgage
pass-through securities.
Equity Securities
Level 1 includes publicly traded securities valued using quoted market prices.
Short-Term Investments
The valuation of securities that are actively traded or have quoted prices are classified as
Level 1. These securities include money market funds and U.S. Treasury bills. Level 2 includes
commercial paper, for which all significant inputs are observable.
20
Assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2009 and December 31,
2008 are summarized below (amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets at Fair |
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Value |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed income securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S.
Government and agencies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury |
|
$ |
18,492 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
18,492 |
|
U.S. Agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,732 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,732 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations residential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,436 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,436 |
|
Mortgage pass-through securities residential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,357 |
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
745,821 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
745,821 |
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
305,008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
305,008 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,600 |
|
Other asset-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second mortgages/home equity loans residential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,320 |
|
Consumer credit receivables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,056 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,056 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,460 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,460 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed income securities |
|
|
18,492 |
|
|
|
1,210,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,229,282 |
|
Equity securities at fair value |
|
|
1,553 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,553 |
|
Short-term investments at fair value (a) |
|
|
22,524 |
|
|
|
47,948 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,472 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
42,569 |
|
|
$ |
1,258,738 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,301,307 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes commercial paper and money market funds. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets at Fair |
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Value |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed income securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S.
Government and agencies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury |
|
$ |
36,659 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
36,659 |
|
U.S. Agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,592 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations residential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,655 |
|
Mortgage pass-through securities residential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,692 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,692 |
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
696,163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
696,163 |
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
93,476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93,476 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,378 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,378 |
|
Other asset-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second mortgages/home equity loans residential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,997 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,997 |
|
Consumer credit receivables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,531 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,531 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,503 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,503 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed income securities |
|
|
36,659 |
|
|
|
997,987 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,034,646 |
|
Equity securities at fair value |
|
|
1,231 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,231 |
|
Short-term investments at fair value (a) |
|
|
30,616 |
|
|
|
49,990 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,606 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
68,506 |
|
|
$ |
1,047,977 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,116,483 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes commercial paper and money market funds. |
21
5. Reserves for Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses
Activity in the reserves for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses was as follows
(dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Reserves at beginning of period: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
$ |
419,812 |
|
|
$ |
495,041 |
|
|
$ |
428,724 |
|
|
$ |
472,842 |
|
Ceded reinsurance |
|
|
40,796 |
|
|
|
152,296 |
|
|
|
83,691 |
|
|
|
150,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net reserves at beginning of period |
|
|
379,016 |
|
|
|
342,745 |
|
|
|
345,033 |
|
|
|
322,346 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net incurred loss and loss adjustment expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for insured events of current year |
|
|
32,291 |
|
|
|
33,685 |
|
|
|
92,907 |
|
|
|
87,104 |
|
Decrease in provision for insured events of prior years |
|
|
(7,862 |
) |
|
|
(24,940 |
) |
|
|
(7,915 |
) |
|
|
(25,001 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net incurred |
|
|
24,429 |
|
|
|
8,745 |
|
|
|
84,992 |
|
|
|
62,103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net payments attributable to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current year events |
|
|
6,717 |
|
|
|
3,456 |
|
|
|
10,323 |
|
|
|
5,996 |
|
Prior year events |
|
|
11,843 |
|
|
|
5,854 |
|
|
|
34,817 |
|
|
|
36,273 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net payments |
|
|
18,560 |
|
|
|
9,310 |
|
|
|
45,140 |
|
|
|
42,269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net reserves at end of period |
|
|
384,885 |
|
|
|
342,180 |
|
|
|
384,885 |
|
|
|
342,180 |
|
Ceded reinsurance at end of period |
|
|
43,401 |
|
|
|
82,381 |
|
|
|
43,401 |
|
|
|
82,381 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross reserves at end of period |
|
$ |
428,286 |
|
|
$ |
424,561 |
|
|
$ |
428,286 |
|
|
$ |
424,561 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior to 2009 the Companys periodic actuarial analyses of loss reserves included a
comprehensive review performed in the third quarter based on data as of June 30 and an update of
the comprehensive review performed in January based on data as of December 31. The Company has
changed the timing of the comprehensive review to occur in the fourth quarter using data as of
September 30. This timing was changed to include an additional three months of actual loss data in
this review. In between these analyses, management monitors claim activity against benchmarks of
expected claim activity prepared in connection with the comprehensive review and records
adjustments as necessary. The Company has experienced favorable claim activity through the first
nine months of 2009 and management believes that this experience is sufficiently credible to
indicate that adjustments to reserves are appropriate, particularly for more mature accident years.
The decrease in the provision for insured events of prior years for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009, reflect adjustments of the reserves for accident years 2004 and prior as
a result of specific indemnity recoveries and reductions in case reserves, and for accident year
2006 as a result of claim activity that was substantially below expectations.
In comparison, the conclusion of the actuarial analysis conducted during the third quarter of
2008 with data as of June 30, 2008 resulted in lower actuarial point estimates, or reserve
indications. These lower estimates resulted from positive claim frequency trends which resulted in
improvements for accident years 2001 through 2006. As a result, management recorded favorable
prior year loss development of $24.9 million on a net basis during the three months ended September
30, 2008.
6. Debt
In May 2004, the Company, through a wholly-owned trust, privately issued $30.0 million of
preferred securities through two pooled transactions. These securities, issued by CNA Surety
Capital Trust I (the Issuer Trust), bear interest at the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR)
plus 337.5 basis points with a 30-year term. Beginning in May 2009, these securities may be
redeemed, in whole or in part, at par value at any scheduled quarterly interest payment date. As
of September 30, 2009, none of these preferred securities have been redeemed.
The Companys investment of $0.9 million in the Issuer Trust is carried at cost in Other
assets in the Companys Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The sole asset of the Issuer Trust
consists of a $30.9 million junior subordinated debenture issued by the Company to the Issuer
Trust. Due to the underlying characteristics of this debt, the carrying value of the debenture
approximates its estimated fair value.
The Company has also guaranteed the dividend payments and redemption of the preferred
securities issued by the Issuer Trust. The maximum amount of undiscounted future payments the
Company could make under the guarantee is approximately $58.2 million,
consisting of annual dividend payments of approximately $1.1 million until maturity and the
redemption value of the preferred securities of $30.0 million. Because payment under the guarantee
would only be required if the Company does not fulfill its obligations under the debentures held by
the Issuer Trust, the Company has not recorded any additional liabilities related to this
guarantee.
22
The junior subordinated debenture bears interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 337.5 basis points
and matures in April 2034. As of September 30, 2009 and 2008, the interest rate on the junior
subordinated debenture was 3.815% and 6.179%, respectively.
On June 30, 2008, the Companys credit facility matured. The term of borrowings under this
facility (the 2005 Credit Facility) was fixed, at the Companys option, for a period of one, two,
three or six months. The interest rate was based on, among other rates, LIBOR plus the applicable
margin. The margin, including a utilization fee, varied based on the Companys leverage ratio (debt
to total capitalization) from 0.80% to 1.00%. There was no outstanding balance under the 2005
Credit Facility during the six months ended June 30, 2008. As such, the Company incurred only the
facility fee of 0.300% through the first six months of 2008.
The 2005 Credit Facility was entered into on July 27, 2005, when the Company refinanced $30.0
million in outstanding borrowings under its previous credit facility. The 2005 Credit Facility
provided an aggregate of up to $50.0 million in borrowings under a revolving credit facility. In
September 2006, the Company reduced the available aggregate revolving credit facility to $25.0
million in borrowings. The 2005 Credit Facility also contained certain conditions and limitations
on the Company. The Company was in compliance with all covenants as of and for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2008 when the 2005 Credit Facility matured.
7. Employee Benefits
Western Surety sponsors two postretirement benefit plans covering certain employees. One plan
provides medical benefits and the other plan provides sick leave termination payments. The medical
benefit plan provides coverage for employees, and their eligible dependents, hired by Western
Surety before November 1, 1991 and who retire at age 55 or later with at least 15 years of service.
Only employees hired by Western Surety prior to 1988 are eligible for the sick leave plan. Further,
benefits for the sick leave plan are based on unused accrued sick leave as of December 31, 2003,
the date the accruals were frozen. The postretirement medical benefit plan is contributory and the
sick leave plan is non-contributory. Western Surety uses a December 31 measurement date for both of
its postretirement benefit plans. There were no plan assets for either of the postretirement
benefit plans.
The plans combined net periodic postretirement benefit cost included the following components
(amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Net periodic benefit cost: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
65 |
|
|
$ |
26 |
|
|
$ |
171 |
|
|
$ |
144 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
429 |
|
|
|
364 |
|
Amortization of prior service cost (benefit) |
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
(68 |
) |
|
|
(121 |
) |
|
|
(121 |
) |
Net amortization of actuarial (gain) loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
185 |
|
|
$ |
20 |
|
|
$ |
479 |
|
|
$ |
387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company uses a roll-forward technique to develop its year-end measurement of the
accumulated postretirement benefit obligation and subsequently performs a valuation as of January 1
of the following year using updated data. This valuation was completed during the third quarter of
2009. As a result, in the third quarter of 2009, the liability for postretirement benefits and the
2009 net periodic benefit costs have been adjusted. The postretirement benefit liability increased
by $0.6 million. Net periodic benefit costs also increased by less than $0.1 million for the three
months ended September 30, 2009 due to this remeasurement. These increases were driven by higher
claims costs for the medical benefit plan.
In the third quarter of 2008, the liability for postretirement benefits and the 2008 net
periodic benefit were also adjusted due to this remeasurement. The postretirement benefit liability
decreased by $1.6 million and net periodic benefit costs decreased $0.2 million for the three
months ended September 30, 2008. These decreases were driven by lower expected per capita claims
costs for the medical benefit plan related to changes in the plan provider.
The Company expects to contribute $0.2 million to the postretirement benefit plans to pay
benefits in 2009. As of September 30, 2009, less than $0.1 million of contributions have been made
to the postretirement benefit plans.
8. Commitments and Contingencies
The Company is party to various lawsuits arising in the normal course of business. The Company
believes the resolution of these lawsuits will not have a material adverse effect on its financial
condition or its results of operations.
23
9. Income Taxes
The Company is subject to taxation in the United States and various state jurisdictions. On
July 22, 2009, the Internal Revenue Service notified the Company that the ongoing examination of
the Companys tax return for the year 2006 had been completed and no changes were made to the
Companys reported income taxes. However, the Companys tax year 2006, as well as tax years 2007
and 2008, remain open as to the applicable statute of limitations and are subject to examination by
the Internal Revenue Service.
The Company has not recognized any liabilities for uncertain income taxes as of September 30,
2009 or December 31, 2008, respectively. Also, the Company does not anticipate any material change
in the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits to occur within the next twelve months.
10. Stockholders Equity
The compensation expense recorded for the Companys stock-based compensation plan was $0.4
million for both the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and $1.4 million
and $1.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The total
income tax benefit recognized in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for stock-based
compensation arrangements was $0.2 million for both the three months ended September 30, 2009 and
2008, respectively. The total income tax benefit recognized in the Condensed Consolidated
Statements of Income for stock-based compensation was $0.5 million for both the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The amount of cash received from the exercise of stock
options was $0.1 million and $0.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, the amount of cash received
was $1.2 million and $0.4 million, respectively.
Equity Compensation Plans
The Company reserved shares of its common stock for issuance to directors, officers, employees
and certain advisors of the Company through incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options,
restricted stock, bonus shares or stock appreciation rights (SARs) to be granted under the CNA
Surety 2006 Long-Term Equity Compensation Plan (the 2006 Plan), approved by shareholders on April
25, 2006. The aggregate number of shares initially available for which options may be granted under
the 2006 Plan was 3,000,000. Option exercises under the 2006 Plan are settled in newly issued
common shares.
The 2006 Plan is administered by a committee (the Committee) of the Board of Directors,
consisting of two or more directors of the Company. Subject to the provisions set forth in the 2006
Plan, all of the members of the Committee shall be independent members of the Board of Directors.
The Committee determines the option exercise prices. Exercise prices may not be less than the fair
market value of the Companys common stock on the date of grant for incentive stock options and may
not be less than the par value of the Companys common stock for nonqualified stock options.
The 2006 Plan provides for the granting of incentive stock options as defined under Section
409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. All nonqualified stock options and incentive
stock options granted under the 2006 Plan expire ten years after the date of grant and vest ratably
over the four-year period following the date of grant.
On February 6, 2009, 217,960 options were granted under the 2006 Plan. The fair market value
(at grant date) per option granted was $8.95 for these options. The fair value of these options was
estimated at the grant date using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted
average assumptions: risk free interest rate of 1.95%; dividend yield of 0.0%; expected option life
of 5.3 years and volatility of 51.8%. The Company estimated the expected option life of the 2009
grant based on its analysis of past exercise patterns for similar options. As of September 30,
2009, the number of shares available for granting of options under the 2006 Plan was 2,247,180.
On February 8, 2008, 259,380 options were granted under the 2006 Plan. The fair market value
(at grant date) per option granted was $6.32 for these options. The fair value of these options was
estimated at the grant date using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted
average assumptions: risk free interest rate of 2.7%; dividend yield of 0.0%; expected option life
of 5.3 years and volatility of 38.3%. The Company estimated the expected option life of the 2008
grant based on its analysis of past exercise patterns for similar options. As of September 30,
2008, the number of shares available for granting of options under the 2006 Plan was 2,434,905.
24
A summary of option activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 is
presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
|
Subject |
|
|
Price Per |
|
|
|
To Option |
|
|
Share |
|
Outstanding options at January 1, 2008 |
|
|
1,054,588 |
|
|
$ |
14.53 |
|
Options granted |
|
|
259,380 |
|
|
$ |
16.35 |
|
Options forfeited |
|
|
(22,210 |
) |
|
$ |
16.99 |
|
Options expired |
|
|
(6,125 |
) |
|
$ |
12.71 |
|
Options exercised |
|
|
(29,800 |
) |
|
$ |
11.53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding options at September 30, 2008 |
|
|
1,255,833 |
|
|
$ |
14.94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding options at January 1, 2009 |
|
|
1,221,118 |
|
|
$ |
14.93 |
|
Options granted |
|
|
217,960 |
|
|
$ |
18.85 |
|
Options forfeited |
|
|
(10,900 |
) |
|
$ |
17.63 |
|
Options expired |
|
|
(13,270 |
) |
|
$ |
14.34 |
|
Options exercised |
|
|
(89,905 |
) |
|
$ |
11.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding options at September 30, 2009 |
|
|
1,325,003 |
|
|
$ |
15.79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A summary of the status of the Companys non-vested options as of September 30, 2009 and 2008
and changes during the nine months then ended is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Subject |
|
|
Grant Date |
|
|
|
To Option |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Non-vested options at January 1, 2008 |
|
|
554,557 |
|
|
$ |
7.23 |
|
Options granted |
|
|
259,380 |
|
|
$ |
6.32 |
|
Options vested |
|
|
(80,785 |
) |
|
$ |
8.94 |
|
Options forfeited |
|
|
(22,210 |
) |
|
$ |
6.95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested options at September 30, 2008 |
|
|
710,942 |
|
|
$ |
6.71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested options at January 1, 2009 |
|
|
545,095 |
|
|
$ |
7.29 |
|
Options granted |
|
|
217,960 |
|
|
$ |
8.95 |
|
Options vested |
|
|
(136,849 |
) |
|
$ |
7.82 |
|
Options forfeited |
|
|
(10,900 |
) |
|
$ |
7.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested options at September 30, 2009 |
|
|
615,306 |
|
|
$ |
7.76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A summary of the options vested or expected to vest and options exercisable as of September
30, 2009 is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Vested or Expected to Vest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
Aggregate |
|
Remaining |
|
|
Number |
|
Exercise Price |
|
Intrinsic Value |
|
Contractual Life |
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
1,250,036 |
|
|
$ |
15.62 |
|
|
$ |
2,483,307 |
|
|
6.7 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Exercisable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
Aggregate |
|
Remaining |
|
|
Number |
|
Exercise Price |
|
Intrinsic Value |
|
Contractual Life |
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
709,697 |
|
|
$ |
13.97 |
|
|
$ |
2,259,472 |
|
|
5.6 years |
The total intrinsic value of options exercised was less than $0.1 million for the three months
ended September 30, 2009. For the three months ended September 30, 2008, the total intrinsic value
of options exercised was $0.1 million. The total intrinsic value of options exercised was $0.5
million and $0.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The
tax benefits recognized by the Company for these exercises were $0.1 million and less than $0.1
million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The tax benefits
recognized by the company for these exercises were $0.2 million and less than $0.1 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
As of September 30, 2009, there was $1.7 million of total unrecognized compensation cost
related to non-vested stock-based compensation arrangements granted under the Companys equity
compensation plans. That cost is expected to be recognized as follows: 2009 $0.4 million; 2010
$0.8 million; 2011 $0.4 million; and 2012 $0.1 million.
25
CNA SURETY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
General
The following is a discussion and analysis of CNA Surety Corporation and its subsidiaries
(collectively, CNA Surety or the Company) operating results, liquidity and capital resources,
and financial condition. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 1 of Part 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Critical Accounting Policies
Management believes the most significant accounting policies and related disclosures for
purposes of understanding the Companys results of operations and financial condition pertain to
reserves for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses and reinsurance, investments, goodwill and
other intangible assets, recognition of premium revenue and the related unearned premium liability
and deferred policy acquisition costs. The Companys accounting policies related to reserves for
unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses and related estimates of reinsurance recoverables are
particularly critical to an assessment of the Companys financial results. Given the nature of the
surety business, the determination of these balances is inherently a highly subjective exercise,
which requires management to analyze, weigh, and balance numerous macroeconomic, customer specific,
and claim specific factors and trends, most of which, in themselves, are inherently uncertain and
difficult to predict.
Reserves for Unpaid Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses and Reinsurance
CNA Surety accrues liabilities for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses (LAE) under
its surety and property and casualty insurance contracts based upon estimates of the ultimate
amounts payable under the contracts related to losses occurring on or before the balance sheet
date.
Reported claims are in various stages of the settlement process. Due to the nature of surety,
which is the relationship among three parties whereby the surety guarantees the performance of the
principal to a third party (the obligee), the investigation of claims and the establishment of case
estimates on claim files can be a complex process that can occur over a period of time depending on
the type of bond(s) and the facts and circumstances involving the particular bond(s), the claim(s)
and the principal. Case reserves are typically established after a claim is filed and an
investigation and analysis has been conducted as to the validity of the claim, the principals
response to the claim and the principals financial viability. To the extent it is determined that
there are no bona fide defenses to the claim and the principal is unwilling or financially unable
to resolve the claim, a case estimate is established on the claim file for the amount the Company
estimates it will have to pay to honor its obligations under the provisions of the bond(s).
While the Company intends to establish initial case reserve estimates that are sufficient to
cover the ultimate anticipated loss on a claim file, some estimates need to be adjusted during the
life cycle of the claim file as matters continue to develop. Factors that can necessitate case
estimate increases or decreases are the complexity of the bond(s) and/or underlying contract(s), if
additional and/or unexpected claims are filed, if the financial condition of the principal or
obligee changes or as claims develop and more information is discovered that was unknown and/or
unexpected at the time the initial case reserve estimate was established. Ultimately, claims are
resolved through payment and/or a determination that, based on the information available, a case
reserve is no longer required.
As of any balance sheet date, not all claims have been reported and some claims may not be
reported for many years. As a result, the liability for unpaid losses includes significant
estimates for incurred-but-not-reported (IBNR) claims. The IBNR reserves also include provisions
for losses in excess of the current case reserve for previously reported claims and for claims that
may be reopened. The IBNR reserves also include offsets for anticipated indemnity recoveries.
The following table shows the estimated liability as of September 30, 2009 for unpaid claims
applicable to reported claims and to IBNR for each sub-line of business (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Case Loss |
|
|
Gross IBNR Loss |
|
|
Total Gross |
|
|
|
and LAE Reserves |
|
|
and LAE Reserves |
|
|
Reserves |
|
Contract |
|
$ |
43,287 |
|
|
$ |
260,977 |
|
|
$ |
304,264 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
51,814 |
|
|
|
57,498 |
|
|
|
109,312 |
|
Fidelity and other |
|
|
3,600 |
|
|
|
11,110 |
|
|
|
14,710 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
98,701 |
|
|
$ |
329,585 |
|
|
$ |
428,286 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
Periodic actuarial analyses of the Companys loss reserves are performed. These analyses have
typically included a comprehensive review performed in the third quarter based on data as of June
30 and an update of the comprehensive review performed in January based on data as of December 31.
The Company has changed the timing of the comprehensive review to occur in the fourth quarter using
data as of September 30. In between these analyses, management monitors claim activity against
benchmarks of expected claim activity prepared in connection with the comprehensive review and
records adjustments as necessary.
The actuarial analyses are based upon multiple projection methodologies that involve detailed
statistical analysis of past claim reporting, settlement activity, and indemnification activity, as
well as claim frequency and severity data when sufficient information exists to lend statistical
credibility to the analysis. The analysis may be based upon internal loss experience or industry
experience. Methodologies may vary depending on the type of claim being estimated. While
methodologies may vary, each employs significant judgments and assumptions.
Each of the projection methodologies employed rely to varying degrees on the basic assumption
that the Companys historical claim experience is indicative of the Companys future claim
development. The amount of weight given to any individual projection method is based on an
assessment of the volatility of the historical data and development patterns, an understanding of
the changes in the overall surety industry over time and the resultant potential impact of these
changes on the Companys prospective claims development, an understanding of the changes to the
Companys processes and procedures within its underwriting, claims handling and data systems
functions, among other things. The decision as to how much weight to give to any particular
projection methodology is ultimately a matter of experience and professional judgment.
Surety results, especially for contract and certain commercial products like insurance program
bonds, workers compensation insurance bonds and reclamation bonds, tend to be impacted by fewer,
but more severe, losses. With this type of loss experience, it is more difficult to estimate the
required reserves, particularly for the most current accident years which may have few reported
claims. Therefore, assumptions related to the frequency and magnitude of severe loss are key in
estimating surety loss reserves.
The indicated reserve, or actuarial point estimate, was developed by reviewing the Companys
claims experience by accident year for several individual sub-lines of business. Within each
sub-line, the selection of the point estimate was made after consideration of the appropriateness
of the various projection methodologies in light of the sub-lines loss characteristics and
historical data. In general, for the older, more mature, accident years the historical development
method (i.e., link ratio method) was relied upon more heavily. For the more recent years, the
indicated reserves were more heavily based on the Bornhuetter-Ferguson and loss ratio methods since
these are not as reliant on the Companys large (i.e., leveraged) development factors and thus are
believed to represent a more stable set of methods from which to select indicated reserves for the
more recent years.
The actuarial analysis is the primary tool that management utilizes in determining its best
estimate of loss reserves. However, the carried reserve may differ from the actuarial point
estimate as a result of managements consideration of the impact of factors such as the following,
especially as they relate to the current accident year:
|
|
|
Current claim activity, including the frequency and severity of current claims; |
|
|
|
|
Changes in underwriting standards and business mix such as the Companys efforts to
reduce exposures to large commercial bonds; |
|
|
|
|
Changes in the claims handling process; |
|
|
|
|
Potential changes in the Companys reinsurance program; and |
|
|
|
|
Current economic conditions, especially corporate default rates and the condition of the construction economy. |
Management believes that the impact of the factors listed above, and others, may not be fully
quantifiable through actuarial analysis. Accordingly, management may apply its judgment of the
impact of these factors, and others, to its selection of the recorded loss reserves.
Receivables recorded with respect to insurance losses ceded to reinsurers under reinsurance
contracts are estimated in a manner similar to liabilities for insurance losses and, therefore, are
also subject to uncertainty. In addition to the factors cited above, estimates of reinsurance
recoveries may prove uncollectible if the reinsurer is unable to perform under the contract.
Reinsurance contracts do not relieve the ceding company of its obligations to indemnify its own
policyholders.
27
Casualty insurance loss reserves are subject to a significant amount of uncertainty. Given the
nature of surety losses with its low frequency, high severity characteristics, this is particularly
true for surety loss reserves. As a result, the range of reasonable loss reserve estimates may be
broader than that associated with traditional property/casualty insurance products. While the loss
reserve estimates represent the best professional judgments, arrived at after careful actuarial
analysis of the available data, it is important to note that variation from the estimates is not
only possible but, in fact, probable. The sources of this inherent variability are numerous
future economic conditions, court decisions, legislative actions, and individual large claim
impacts, for example.
Due to the inherent uncertainties in the process of establishing the liabilities for unpaid
losses and loss adjustment expenses, the actual ultimate claims amounts will differ from the
currently recorded amounts. This difference could have a material effect on reported earnings and
financial condition. Future effects from changes in these estimates will be recorded in the period
such changes are determined to be needed.
Investments
Management believes the Company has the ability to hold all fixed income securities to
maturity. However, the Company may dispose of securities prior to their scheduled maturity due to
changes in interest rates, prepayments, tax and credit considerations, liquidity or regulatory
capital requirements, or other similar factors. As a result, the Company considers all of its fixed
income securities (bonds) and equity securities as available-for-sale. These securities are
reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses, net of deferred income taxes, reported in
stockholders equity as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income.
Fixed income securities in an unrealized loss position that the Company intends to sell, or it
more likely than not will be required to sell before recovery of amortized cost, are considered to
be other-than-temporarily impaired. These securities are written down to fair value and the
resulting losses are recognized in realized gains/losses in the Condensed Consolidated Statements
of Income. Fixed income securities in an unrealized loss position for which management believes a
credit loss exists are considered to be other-than-temporarily impaired. For those securities, the
Company bifurcates the impairment into a credit component and a non-credit component. The credit
component, which represents the difference between discounted cash flows and the fixed income
securitys amortized cost, is recognized in earnings and the non-credit component is recognized in
other comprehensive income. Cash flows from purchases, sales and maturities of fixed income and
equity securities are reported gross in the investing activities section of the Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
The amortized cost of fixed income securities is determined based on cost and the cumulative
effect of amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts using the interest method. Such
amortization and accretion are included in investment income. For mortgage-backed and asset-backed
securities, the Company considers estimates of future prepayments in the calculation of the
effective yield used to apply the interest method. If a difference arises between the anticipated
prepayments and the actual prepayments, the Company recalculates the effective yield based on
actual prepayments and the currently anticipated future prepayments. The amortized costs of such
securities are adjusted to the amount that would have resulted had the recalculated effective
yields been applied since the acquisition of the securities with a corresponding charge or credit
to investment income. Prepayment estimates are based on the structural elements of specific
securities, interest rates and generally recognized prepayment speed indices.
Short-term investments, that generally include U.S. Treasury bills, corporate notes, money
market funds and investment grade commercial paper equivalents, are carried at amortized cost,
which approximates fair value.
Invested assets are exposed to various risks, such as interest rate risk, market risk and
credit risk. Due to the level of risk associated with invested assets and the level of uncertainty
related to changes in the value of these assets, it is possible that changes in risks in the near
term may materially affect the amounts reported in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets and
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.
Intangible Assets
CNA Suretys Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2009 and December 31,
2008 include goodwill and intangible assets of approximately $138.8 million. This amount primarily
represents goodwill and identified intangibles with indefinite useful lives arising from the
acquisition of Capsure Holdings Corp. (Capsure).
A significant amount of judgment is required in performing intangible assets impairment tests.
Such tests include periodically determining or reviewing the estimated fair value of CNA Suretys
reporting units. Under the relevant standard, fair value refers to the
28
amount for which the entire
reporting unit may be bought or sold. There are several methods of estimating fair value, including
market quotations, asset and liability fair values and other valuation techniques, such as
discounted cash flows and multiples of earnings or revenues. The Company uses a valuation technique
based on discounted cash flows. Significant inputs to the Companys discounted cash flow model
include estimated capital requirements to support the business, expected cash flows from
underwriting activity, required capital investment to support growth and the selected discount
rates. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit, including goodwill, exceeds the estimated fair
value, then individual assets, including identifiable intangible assets, and liabilities of the
reporting unit are estimated at fair value. The excess of the estimated fair value of the reporting
unit over the estimated fair value of net assets would establish the implied value of intangible
assets. The excess of the recorded amount of intangible assets over the implied value of intangible
assets is recorded as an impairment loss.
Insurance Premiums
Insurance premiums are recognized as revenue ratably over the term of the related policies in
proportion to the insurance protection provided. Contract bonds provide coverage for the length of
the bonded project and not a fixed time period. As such, the Company uses estimates of the contract
length as the basis for recognizing premium revenue on these bonds. Premium revenues are net of
amounts ceded to reinsurers. Unearned premiums represent the portion of premiums written, before
ceded reinsurance which is shown as an asset, applicable to the unexpired terms of policies in
force determined on a pro rata basis.
Deferred Policy Acquisitions Costs
Policy acquisition costs, consisting of commissions, premium taxes and other underwriting
expenses which vary with, and are primarily related to, the production of business, net of
reinsurance commissions, are deferred and amortized as a charge to income as the related premiums
are earned. The Company periodically tests that deferred policy acquisition costs are recoverable
based on the expected profitability embedded in the reserve for unearned premium. If the expected
profitability is less than the balance of deferred policy acquisition costs, a charge to net income
is taken and the deferred policy acquisition cost balance is reduced to the amount determined to be
recoverable. Anticipated investment income is considered in the determination of the recoverability
of deferred policy acquisition costs.
Results of Operations
Financial Measures
The Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(MD&A) discusses certain accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
(GAAP) and non-GAAP financial measures in order to provide information used by management to
monitor the Companys operating performance. Management utilizes various financial measures to
monitor the Companys insurance operations and investment portfolio. Underwriting results, which
are derived from certain income statement amounts, are considered a non-GAAP financial measure and
are used by management to monitor performance of the Companys insurance operations.
Underwriting results are computed as net earned premiums less net loss and loss adjustment
expenses and net commissions, brokerage and other underwriting expenses. Management uses
underwriting results to monitor its insurance operations results without the impact of certain
factors, including net investment income, net realized investment gains (losses) and interest
expense. Management excludes these factors in order to analyze the direct relationship between net
earned premiums and the related net loss and loss adjustment expenses along with net commissions,
brokerage and other underwriting expenses.
Operating ratios are calculated using insurance results and are widely used by the insurance
industry and regulators such as state departments of insurance and the National Association of
Insurance Commissioners for financial regulation and as a basis of comparison among companies. The
ratios discussed in the Companys MD&A are calculated using GAAP financial results and include the
net loss and loss adjustment expense ratio (loss ratio) as well as the net commissions, brokerage
and other underwriting expense ratio (expense ratio) and combined ratio. The loss ratio is the
percentage of net incurred losses and loss adjustment
expenses to net earned premiums. The expense ratio is the percentage of net commissions,
brokerage and other underwriting expenses, including the amortization of deferred acquisition
costs, to net earned premiums. The combined ratio is the sum of the loss and expense ratios.
While management uses various GAAP and non-GAAP financial measures to monitor various aspects
of the Companys performance, net income is the most directly comparable GAAP measure and
represents a more comprehensive measure of operating
29
performance. Management believes that its
process of evaluating performance through the use of these non-GAAP financial measures provides a
basis for enhanced understanding of the operating performance and the impact to net income as a
whole. Management also believes that investors may find these widely used financial measures
described above useful in interpreting the underlying trends and performance, as well as to provide
visibility into the significant components of net income.
Comparison of CNA Surety Actual Results for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
Analysis of Net Income
Net income for the three months ended September 30, 2009 was $25.5 million, or $0.57 per
diluted share, compared to $34.3 million, or $0.78 per diluted share, for the same period in 2008.
The decrease in net income reflects the impact of higher net favorable loss reserve development in
the 2008 period, partially offset by higher investment income and higher net realized investment
gains in the 2009 period.
Net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was $68.6 million, or $1.54 per
diluted share, compared to $81.3 million, or $1.84 per diluted share, in 2008. The decrease in net
income reflects lower earned premium and the impact of a higher loss ratio, partially offset by
higher net investment income and higher net realized investment gains. The 2008 period also
benefitted from higher levels of favorable loss reserve development in prior accident years.
The components of net income are discussed in the following sections.
Results of Insurance Operations
Underwriting components for the Company for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009
and 2008 are summarized in the following table (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Gross written premiums |
|
$ |
113,402 |
|
|
$ |
120,362 |
|
|
$ |
341,361 |
|
|
$ |
361,299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net written premiums |
|
$ |
106,361 |
|
|
$ |
108,805 |
|
|
$ |
320,495 |
|
|
$ |
333,626 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earned premiums |
|
$ |
109,703 |
|
|
$ |
109,696 |
|
|
$ |
316,549 |
|
|
$ |
320,814 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
$ |
24,429 |
|
|
$ |
8,745 |
|
|
$ |
84,992 |
|
|
$ |
62,103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net commissions, brokerage and other underwriting expenses |
|
$ |
62,169 |
|
|
$ |
61,694 |
|
|
$ |
172,364 |
|
|
$ |
174,806 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss ratio |
|
|
22.3 |
% |
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
|
26.8 |
% |
|
|
19.4 |
% |
Expense ratio |
|
|
56.7 |
|
|
|
56.2 |
|
|
|
54.5 |
|
|
|
54.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined ratio |
|
|
79.0 |
% |
|
|
64.2 |
% |
|
|
81.3 |
% |
|
|
73.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums Written/Earned
CNA Surety primarily markets contract and commercial surety bonds. Contract surety bonds
generally secure a contractors performance and/or payment obligation with respect to a
construction project. Contract surety bonds are generally required by federal, state and local
governments for public works projects. The most common types include bid, performance and payment
bonds. Commercial surety bonds include all surety bonds other than contract and cover obligations
typically required by law or regulation. The commercial surety market includes numerous types of
bonds categorized as court judicial, court fiduciary, public official, license and permit and many
miscellaneous bonds that include guarantees of financial performance. The Company also writes
fidelity bonds that cover losses arising from employee dishonesty and other insurance products that
are generally companion products to certain surety bonds. For example, the Company writes surety
bonds for notaries and also offers related errors and omissions (E&O) insurance coverage.
Through one of its insurance subsidiaries, Western Surety Company (Western Surety), the
Company assumes significant amounts of premiums primarily from affiliates. This includes surety
business written or renewed, net of reinsurance, by Continental
Casualty Company (CCC) and The Continental Insurance Company (CIC), and their affiliates,
after September 30, 1997 that is reinsured by Western Surety pursuant to reinsurance and related
agreements. Because of certain regulatory restrictions that limit the Companys ability to write
certain business on a direct basis, the Company continues to utilize the underwriting capacity
available through these agreements. The Company is in full control of all aspects of the
underwriting and claim management of this assumed business.
30
Gross written premium, which is the aggregate of direct written premiums and assumed written
premiums, for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 is shown in the
table below (dollars in thousands) for each sub-line of business:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Contract |
|
$ |
71,817 |
|
|
$ |
78,418 |
|
|
$ |
215,301 |
|
|
$ |
233,766 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
34,163 |
|
|
|
34,331 |
|
|
|
102,579 |
|
|
|
103,192 |
|
Fidelity and other |
|
|
7,422 |
|
|
|
7,613 |
|
|
|
23,481 |
|
|
|
24,341 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
113,402 |
|
|
$ |
120,362 |
|
|
$ |
341,361 |
|
|
$ |
361,299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the quarter ended September 30, 2009, gross written premiums decreased 5.8 percent to
$113.4 million compared to $120.4 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2008. Contract surety
gross written premiums decreased 8.4 percent to $71.8 million due to lower demand resulting from
fewer new construction projects. Commercial surety written premiums decreased slightly to $34.2
million due to continued adverse economic conditions.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, gross written premiums decreased 5.5 percent to
$341.4 million compared to $361.3 million for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2008. Gross
written premiums for contract surety decreased 7.9 percent to $215.3 million due to lower demand
resulting from fewer new construction projects. Commercial surety decreased 0.6 percent to $102.6
million in the first nine months of 2009, reflecting adverse economic conditions.
The Companys insurance subsidiaries purchase reinsurance from other insurance companies and
affiliates. Reinsurance arrangements are used to limit maximum loss, provide greater
diversification of risk and minimize exposure on larger risks. The cost of this reinsurance is
recorded as ceded written premium. Ceded written premium decreased $4.5 million and $6.8 million
for the three and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009, respectively, compared to the same
periods in 2008. The Companys decision to increase the per principal retention from $10.0 million
to $15.0 million resulted in lower ceded premiums on the 2009 core reinsurance program. Further, as
a result of additional losses ceded under the 2007 third party excess of loss treaty, the Company
recorded additional ceded premiums of $0.5 million and $4.2 million for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Net written premiums, which is gross written premiums less ceded written premiums, for the
three months and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 are shown in the table below
(dollars in thousands) for each sub-line of business:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Contract |
|
$ |
65,674 |
|
|
$ |
67,692 |
|
|
$ |
196,826 |
|
|
$ |
208,490 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
33,265 |
|
|
|
33,500 |
|
|
|
100,188 |
|
|
|
100,795 |
|
Fidelity and other |
|
|
7,422 |
|
|
|
7,613 |
|
|
|
23,481 |
|
|
|
24,341 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
106,361 |
|
|
$ |
108,805 |
|
|
$ |
320,495 |
|
|
$ |
333,626 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the quarter ended September 30, 2009, net written premiums decreased 2.2 percent to $106.4
million compared to $108.8 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 reflecting the decrease
in gross written premium, partially offset by lower ceded premium.
Net written premiums for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 decreased 3.9 percent to
$320.5 million compared to $333.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 reflecting
the decrease in gross written premium, partially offset by lower ceded premium.
Net written premiums are recognized as revenue over the policy term as net earned premiums.
Net earned premiums for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 are
shown in the table below (dollars in thousands) for each sub-line of business:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Contract |
|
$ |
68,815 |
|
|
$ |
68,274 |
|
|
$ |
195,314 |
|
|
$ |
198,772 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
33,208 |
|
|
|
33,493 |
|
|
|
98,246 |
|
|
|
98,487 |
|
Fidelity and other |
|
|
7,680 |
|
|
|
7,929 |
|
|
|
22,989 |
|
|
|
23,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
109,703 |
|
|
$ |
109,696 |
|
|
$ |
316,549 |
|
|
$ |
320,814 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the quarter ended September 30, 2009, net earned premiums were flat as compared to the
third quarter of 2008. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, net earned premiums decreased
1.3 percent to $316.5 million, due to the decrease in net written premiums described above.
31
Net Loss Ratio
The net loss ratio was 22.3% for the three months ended September 30, 2009 compared with 8.0%
for the same period in 2008. The net loss ratio was 26.8% for the nine months ended September 30,
2009 compared with 19.4% for the same period last year. These loss ratios include re-estimates of
prior accident year reserves, known as reserve development. The dollar amount and percentage point
effect of these reserve reductions were $7.9 million, or 7.1 percentage points, and $24.9 million,
or 22.7 percentage points, for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
The dollar amount of these revisions were reductions of $7.9 million, or 2.6 percentage points, and
$25.0 million, or 7.8 percentage points, for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
Management monitors claim activity against benchmarks of expected claim activity prepared in
connection with the comprehensive actuarial review. As previously discussed, prior to 2009 the
Companys periodic actuarial analyses of loss reserves included a comprehensive review performed in
the third quarter based on data as of June 30 and an update of the comprehensive review performed
in January based on data as of December 31. The Company has changed the timing of the comprehensive
review to occur in the fourth quarter using data as of September 30. This timing was changed to
include an additional three months of actual loss data in this review. The Company has experienced
favorable claim activity through the first nine months of 2009 and management believes that this
experience is sufficiently credible to indicate that adjustments to reserves are appropriate,
particularly for more mature accident years. The reserve reductions for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2009, reflect adjustments of the reserves for accident years 2004 and prior
as a result of specific indemnity recoveries and reductions in case reserves, and for accident
year 2006 as a result of claim activity that was substantially below expectations.
In comparison, the conclusion of the actuarial analysis conducted during the third quarter of
2008 with data as of June 30, 2008 resulted in lower actuarial point estimates, or reserve
indications. These lower estimates resulted from positive claim frequency trends which resulted in
improvements for accident years 2001 through 2006. As a result, management recorded favorable
prior year loss development of $24.9 million on a net basis during the three months ended September
30, 2008.
Expense Ratio
The expense ratio was 56.7% and 54.5% for the three months and nine months ended September 30,
2009 as compared with 56.2% and 54.5% for the same periods in 2008, respectively. Expenses for the
quarter ended September 30, 2009 included impairments of capitalized software development costs
related to in-development projects that the Company decided to terminate. These impairments totaled
$4.9 million, which added 4.5 and 1.6 percentage points to the expense ratio for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2009, respectively. The expense ratios for the three months and nine months
ended September 30, 2008 included the impact on net earned premium of the additional ceded premiums
discussed above and the impact of increased accruals for incentive compensation based on strong
results for the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
Investment Income and Realized Investment Gains/Losses
Net investment income for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 was $12.5 million compared to
$11.8 million during the third quarter of 2008 due to an increase in invested assets, partially
offset by lower yields, particularly on short-term investments. The annualized pre-tax yields were
4.1% and 4.3% for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The annualized
after-tax yields were 3.4% and 3.5% for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
Net investment income for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was $37.4 million compared
to $35.3 million for the same period in 2008. The increase reflects the impact of higher overall
invested assets. The annualized pre-tax yields were 4.2% and 4.4% for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The annualized after-tax yields were 3.5% and 3.7% for
the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The decrease in annualized yields
was primarily due to a decline in short-term yields.
32
The following summarizes net realized investment gains (losses) activity (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Net realized investment gains (losses): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed income securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross realized investment gains |
|
$ |
1,448 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,491 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Gross realized investment losses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other-than-temporary impairment losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(116 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Realized losses from sales |
|
|
(392 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(392 |
) |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross realized investment losses |
|
|
(392 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(508 |
) |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized investment gains (losses) on fixed income securities |
|
|
1,056 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
983 |
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross realized investment gains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Gross realized investment losses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other-than-temporary impairment losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(178 |
) |
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
(178 |
) |
Realized losses from sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross realized investment losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(178 |
) |
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
(198 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized investment gains (losses) on equity securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(177 |
) |
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
(187 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized investment gains (losses) |
|
$ |
1,056 |
|
|
$ |
(177 |
) |
|
$ |
943 |
|
|
$ |
(207 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys investment portfolio is generally managed to maximize after-tax investment
return, while minimizing credit risk with investments concentrated in high quality fixed income
securities. CNA Suretys portfolio is managed to provide diversification by limiting exposures to
any one industry, issue or issuer, and to provide liquidity by investing in the public securities
markets. The portfolio is structured to support CNA Suretys insurance underwriting operations and
to consider the expected duration of liabilities and short-term cash needs. In achieving these
goals, assets may be sold to take advantage of market conditions or other investment opportunities
or regulatory, credit and tax considerations. These activities will produce realized gains and
losses.
Interest Expense
The benchmark interest rate for the Companys variable interest rate debt is the London
Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR). Due to lower three-month LIBOR rates, interest expense decreased
by 37.2 percent and 33.9 percent for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009,
respectively, as compared with the same periods in 2008. Weighted average debt outstanding was
$30.9 million for each of these periods. The weighted average interest rate for the three months
ended September 30, 2009 was 4.0% as compared with 6.1% for the same period in 2008. The weighted
average interest rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was 4.5% as compared with 6.6%
for the same period in 2008.
Income Taxes
The Companys income tax expense was $10.9 million and $27.8 million for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2009, respectively. The Companys income tax expense was $16.0 million
and $36.0 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively. The
effective income tax rates for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 were 29.8% and
28.9%, respectively. The effective income tax rates for the three and nine months ended September
30, 2008 were 31.8% and 30.7%, respectively. The Companys effective tax rate differs from the
statutory tax rate due primarily to tax-exempt investment income. Tax-exempt investment income was
$6.1 million and $19.2 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009,
respectively. Tax-exempt investment income was $6.1 million and $17.5 million for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively.
Exposure Management
The Companys business is subject to certain risks and uncertainties associated with the
current economic environment and corporate credit conditions. In response to these risks and
uncertainties, the Company has enacted various exposure management initiatives. With respect to
risks on large commercial accounts, the Company generally limits its exposure to $25.0 million per
account, but will selectively accept higher exposures.
33
With respect to contract surety, the Companys portfolio is predominantly comprised of
contractors with bonded backlog of less than $30.0 million. Bonded backlog is an estimate of the
Companys exposure in the event of default before indemnification. The Company does have accounts
with bonded backlogs greater than $30.0 million.
The Company manages its exposure to any one contract credit and aggressively looks for
co-surety, shared accounts and other means to support or reduce larger exposures. Reinsurance and
indemnification rights, including rights to contract proceeds on construction projects in the event
of default, exist that substantially reduce CNA Suretys exposure to loss.
Excess of Loss Reinsurance
The Companys reinsurance program is predominantly comprised of excess of loss reinsurance
contracts that limit the Companys retention on a per principal basis. The Companys reinsurance
coverage is provided by third party reinsurers and related parties. Due to the terms and conditions
of these excess of loss treaties, reinsurers may cover some principals in one year but then exclude
these same principals in subsequent years. As a result, the Company may have exposures to these
principals that have limited or no reinsurance coverage.
2009 Third Party Reinsurance
Effective January 1, 2009, CNA Surety entered into a new excess of loss treaty (2009 Excess
of Loss Treaty) with a group of third party reinsurers on terms similar to the 2008 Excess of Loss
Treaty discussed below. Under the 2009 Excess of Loss Treaty, the Companys net retention per
principal is $15 million with a 5% co-participation in the $90 million layer of third party
reinsurance coverage above the Companys retention. The contract provides aggregate coverage of
$185 million and includes an optional extended discovery period, for an additional premium (a
percentage of the original premium based on any unexhausted aggregate limit by layer), which will
provide coverage for losses discovered beyond 2009 on bonds that were in force during 2009. The
contract also includes a provision for additional premiums of up to $13.8 million based on losses
ceded under the contract. The base annual premium for the 2009 Excess of Loss Treaty is $28.0
million. Only the large national contractor discussed below remains excluded from the 2009 Excess
of Loss Treaty.
2008 Third Party Reinsurance
Effective January 1, 2008, CNA Surety entered into an excess of loss treaty (2008 Excess of
Loss Treaty) with a group of third party reinsurers on terms similar to the excess of loss treaty
effective in 2007. Under the 2008 Excess of Loss Treaty, the Companys net retention per principal
remained at $10 million with a 5% co-participation in the $90 million layer of third party
reinsurance coverage above the Companys retention. The contract provided aggregate coverage of
$185 million and included an optional extended discovery period, which was not exercised. The
contract also included a provision for additional premiums of up to $26.1 million based on losses
ceded under the contract. The actual ceded premiums for the 2008 Excess of Loss Treaty were $30.4
million. Only the large national contractor discussed below was excluded from the 2008 Excess of
Loss Treaty. There were no additional premiums or loss recoveries under the 2008 Excess of Loss
Treaty as no losses were discovered to this treaty in 2008.
Related Party Reinsurance
Reinsurance agreements together with the Services and Indemnity Agreement that are described
below provide for the transfer of the surety business written by CCC and CIC to Western Surety. All
of these agreements originally were entered into on September 30, 1997 (the Merger Date): (i) the
Surety Quota Share Treaty (the Quota Share Treaty); (ii) the Aggregate Stop Loss Reinsurance
Contract (the Stop Loss Contract); and (iii) the Surety Excess of Loss Reinsurance Contract (the
Excess of Loss Contract). All of these contracts have expired. Some have been renewed on
different terms as described below.
The Services and Indemnity Agreement provides the Companys insurance subsidiaries with the
authority to perform various administrative, management, underwriting and claim functions in order
to conduct the business of CCC and CIC and to be reimbursed by CCC for services rendered. In
consideration for providing the foregoing services, CCC has agreed to pay Western Surety a
quarterly fee of $50,000. This agreement was renewed with the same terms on January 1, 2009 and
expires on December 31, 2009
and is annually renewable thereafter. Effective June 30, 2009, the Company and CCC agreed to
an addendum to this agreement that is discussed below.
Through the Quota Share Treaty, CCC and CIC transfer to Western Surety surety business written
or renewed by CCC and CIC after the Merger Date. The Quota Share Treaty was renewed on January 1,
2009 and expires on December 31, 2009 and is annually
34
renewable thereafter. CCC and CIC transfer
the related liabilities of such business and pay to Western Surety an amount in cash equal to CCCs
and CICs net written premiums written on all such business, minus a quarterly ceding commission to
be retained by CCC and CIC equal to $50,000 plus 25% of net written premiums written on all such
business. For 2008, this resulted in an override commission on their actual direct acquisition
costs of 5.9% to CCC and CIC.
Under the terms of the Quota Share Treaty, CCC has guaranteed the loss and loss adjustment
expense reserves transferred to Western Surety as of the Merger Date by agreeing to pay Western
Surety, within 30 days following the end of each calendar quarter, the amount of any adverse
development on such reserves, as re-estimated as of the end of such calendar quarter. There was no
adverse reserve development for the period from the Merger Date through September 30, 2009.
Through the Stop Loss Contract, the Companys insurance subsidiaries were protected from
adverse loss development on certain business underwritten after the Merger Date. The Stop Loss
Contract between the insurance subsidiaries and CCC limited the insurance subsidiaries prospective
net loss ratios with respect to certain accounts and lines of insured business for three full
accident years following the Merger Date. In the event the insurance subsidiaries accident year
net loss ratio exceeds 24% in any of the accident years 1997 through 2000 on certain insured
accounts (the Loss Ratio Cap), the Stop Loss Contract requires CCC at the end of each calendar
quarter following the Merger Date, to pay to the insurance subsidiaries a dollar amount equal to
(i) the amount, if any, by which the Companys actual accident year net loss ratio exceeds the
applicable Loss Ratio Cap, multiplied by (ii) the applicable net earned premiums. In consideration
for the coverage provided by the Stop Loss Contract, the insurance subsidiaries paid to CCC an
annual premium of $20,000. The CNA Surety insurance subsidiaries have paid CCC all required annual
premiums. Through September 30, 2009, losses incurred under the Stop Loss Contract were $49.7
million. Through December 31, 2008, losses incurred under the Stop Loss Contract were $48.9
million. The increase is primarily due to unfavorable development of a large commercial claim that
was settled for less than what had been carried as an expected recovery. As a result of this
unfavorable development, the Company recorded a receivable of $0.8 million from CCC at September
30, 2009. As a result of favorable development on claims subject to the Stop Loss Contract during
the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company paid CCC $0.7 million in 2009 under the Stop Loss Contract.
At September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 these losses incurred are net of $1.6 million and $2.1
million, respectively, related to expected indemnity recoveries.
The Company and CCC previously participated in a $40 million excess of $60 million reinsurance
contract effective from January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2005 providing coverage exclusively for the
one large national contractor excluded from the Companys third party reinsurance. The premium for
this contract was $3.0 million plus an additional premium of $6.0 million if a loss was ceded under
this contract. In the second quarter of 2005, this contract was amended to provide unlimited
coverage in excess of the $60 million retention, to increase the premium to $7.0 million and to
eliminate the additional premium provision. This treaty provides coverage for the life of bonds
either in force or written during the term of the treaty which was from January 1, 2005 to December
31, 2005. The Company and CCC agreed by addendum to extend this contract for twelve months
beginning on January 1, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009. Additional premiums for these periods were $0.8
million, $0.5 million, $0.2 million and less than $0.1 million, respectively, and were based on the
level of actual premiums written on bonds for the large national contractor.
On June 30, 2009, the Company and CCC agreed by addendum to terminate the reinsurance contract
discussed in the preceding paragraph under which the Company had ceded losses and loss adjustment
expenses of $50.0 million through both June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008. Unpaid ceded losses
under this contract on June 30, 2009, prior to the termination becoming effective, were $50.0
million compared to $46.8 million at December 31, 2008. As a result of indemnification recoveries
during the first quarter of 2009, $3.2 million was returned to CCC. In addition to the termination
of this contract, the Company and CCC agreed to commute the Quota Share Treaty as regards premium
and losses for the large national contractor. The impact of this commutation was a decrease of
gross loss reserves of $51.8 million. Further, the Services and Indemnity Agreement was amended by
addendum to specifically extend the Companys authority to conduct administrative, management,
underwriting and claim functions as respects business of the large national contractor until CCCs
bonds have expired and claims have been settled or closed.
Under the terms of the agreements effecting this commutation, the Company paid CCC $1.8
million. This settlement reflects the difference between the Companys $60.0 million retention
under the reinsurance contract and $58.2 million paid by the Company for losses of the large
national contractor through June 30, 2009. These transactions had no net impact on the results of
operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
As of September 30, 2009, CNA Surety had an insurance receivable balance from CCC and CIC of
$10.5 million, including $0.8 million of reinsurance recoverables and $9.7 million of premiums
receivable, respectively. At December 31, 2008, the Companys insurance receivable balance from CCC
and CIC was $60.4 million, including $46.1 million of reinsurance recoverables and $14.3
35
million of
premiums receivable, respectively. CNA Surety had no reinsurance payables to CCC and CIC as of
September 30, 2009. CNA Surety had reinsurance payables to CCC and CIC of $1.2 million as of
December 31, 2008.
The Companys Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets also include a Deposit with affiliated
ceding company of $27.4 million and $29.7 million at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008,
respectively. In 2005, pursuant to an agreement with the claimant on a bond regarding certain
aspects of the claim resolution, the Company deposited $32.7 million with an affiliate to enable
the affiliate to establish a trust to fund future payments under the bond. The bond was written by
the affiliate and assumed by one of the Companys insurance subsidiaries pursuant to the Quota
Share Treaty. The Company is entitled to the interest income earned by the trust. Prior to the
establishment of the trust, the Company had fully reserved its obligation under the bond and the
claim remains fully reserved.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
It is anticipated that the liquidity requirements of CNA Surety will be met primarily by funds
generated from operations. The principal sources of operating cash flows are premiums, investment
income and recoveries under reinsurance contracts. The primary cash flow uses are payments for
claims, operating expenses, federal income taxes and debt service. In general, surety operations
generate premium collections from customers in advance of cash outlays for claims. Premiums are
invested until such time as funds are required to pay claims and claims adjusting expenses.
The Company believes that total invested assets, including cash and short-term investments,
are sufficient in the aggregate and have suitably scheduled maturities to satisfy all policy claims
and other operating liabilities, including dividend and income tax sharing payments of its
insurance subsidiaries. If cash requirements unexpectedly exceed cash inflows, the Company may
raise additional cash by liquidating fixed income securities ahead of their scheduled maturity.
Depending on the interest rate environment at that time, the Company could generate realized gains
or losses that would increase or decrease net income for the period. The extent of these gains or
losses would depend on a number of factors such as the prevailing interest rates and credit
spreads, the duration of the assets sold and the marketability of the assets. The need to liquidate
fixed income securities would be expected to cause a reduction in future investment income.
At September 30, 2009, the carrying value of the Companys insurance subsidiaries invested
assets was comprised of $1,229.3 million of fixed income securities, $66.9 million of short-term
investments and $3.6 million of cash. At December 31, 2008, the carrying value of the Companys
insurance subsidiaries invested assets was comprised of $1,034.6 million of fixed income
securities, $72.1 million of short-term investments and $4.1 million of cash.
Cash flow at the parent company level is derived principally from dividend and tax sharing
payments from its insurance subsidiaries, and to a lesser extent, investment income. The principal
obligations at the parent company level are to service debt and pay operating expenses, including
income taxes. At September 30, 2009, the parent companys invested assets consisted of $1.6
million of equity securities, $3.6 million of short-term investments and $3.2 million of cash. At
December 31, 2008, the parent companys invested assets consisted of $1.2 million of equity
securities, $8.5 million of short-term investments and $4.6 million of cash. At September 30, 2009
and December 31, 2008, parent company short-term investments and cash included $5.9 million and
$11.5 million, respectively, of restricted cash primarily related to premium receipt collections
ultimately due to the Companys insurance subsidiaries.
The Companys consolidated net cash flow provided by operating activities was $109.7 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to net cash flow provided by operating
activities of $85.2 million for the comparable period in 2008. The increase in net cash flow
provided by operating activities primarily relates to the absence of the payment of $49.0 million
on July 1, 2008 in settlement of a large claim and collection of $25.4 million of recoveries
associated with that claim during the third quarter of 2008.
The Companys consolidated net cash flow provided by operating activities was $44.5 million
for the three months ended September 30, 2009 compared to net cash flow provided by operating
activities of $31.0 million for the comparable period in 2008. The increase in net cash flow
provided by operating activities primarily relates to the absence of the payment and reinsurance
recoveries associated with the large claim discussed above. Without the impact of that claim
settlement, loss and loss adjustment expense payments were higher in the third quarter of 2009
compared to the same period in 2008.
The Companys consolidated net cash flow provided by financing activities for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009 included the effect of a $14.9 million overdraft of a short-term investment
account associated with the Companys investment custody account which occurred due to the timing
of settlement of purchases of long-term fixed income securities and the related sale of a
36
short-term U.S. Government discount note. Since the Company records investment transactions on
the trade date basis, the result was a negative balance in this account, which was reported in
Other Liabilities on the Companys Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2009.
The short-term account overdraft was cleared on October 1, 2009 when the sale of the discount
note was initiated and settled.
In May 2004, the Company, through a wholly-owned trust, privately issued $30.0 million of
preferred securities through two pooled transactions. These securities, issued by CNA Surety
Capital Trust I (the Issuer Trust), bear interest at LIBOR
plus 337.5 basis points with a 30-year term. Beginning in May 2009, these securities may be
redeemed, in whole or in part, at par value at any scheduled quarterly interest payment date. As
of September 30, 2009, none of these preferred securities have been redeemed.
The Companys investment of $0.9 million in the Issuer Trust is carried at cost in Other
assets in the Companys Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The sole asset of the Issuer Trust
consists of a $30.9 million junior subordinated debenture issued by the Company to the Issuer
Trust. Due to the underlying characteristics of this debt, the carrying value of the debenture
approximates its estimated fair value.
The Company has also guaranteed the dividend payments and redemption of the preferred
securities issued by the Issuer Trust. The maximum amount of undiscounted future payments the
Company could make under the guarantee is approximately $58.2 million, consisting of annual
dividend payments of approximately $1.1 million until maturity and the redemption value of the
preferred securities of $30.0 million. Because payment under the guarantee would only be required
if the Company does not fulfill its obligations under the debentures held by the Issuer Trust, the
Company has not recorded any additional liabilities related to this guarantee.
The junior subordinated debenture bears interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 337.5 basis points
and matures in April 2034. As of September 30, 2009 and 2008, the interest rate on the junior
subordinated debenture was 3.815% and 6.179%, respectively.
On June 30, 2008, the Companys credit facility matured. There was no outstanding balance
under this facility (the 2005 Credit Facility) during 2008. The term of borrowings under the 2005
Credit Facility was fixed, at the Companys option, for a period of one, two, three or six months.
The interest rate was based on, among other rates, LIBOR plus the applicable margin. The margin,
including a utilization fee, varied based on the Companys leverage ratio (debt to total
capitalization) from 0.80% to 1.00%. There was no outstanding balance under the 2005 Credit
Facility during the six months ended June 30, 2008. As such, the Company incurred only the
facility fee of 0.300% through the first six months of 2008.
The 2005 Credit Facility was entered into on July 27, 2005, when the Company refinanced $30.0
million in outstanding borrowings under its previous credit facility. The 2005 Credit Facility
provided an aggregate of up to $50.0 million in borrowings under a revolving credit facility. In
September 2006, the Company reduced the available aggregate revolving credit facility to $25.0
million in borrowings. The 2005 Credit Facility also contained certain conditions and limitations
on the Company. The Company was in compliance with all covenants as of and for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2008 when the 2005 Credit Facility matured.
The Company does not have any material off-balance sheet arrangements as defined by Item 303
of Regulation S-K under the Exchange Acts of 1933 and 1934.
A summary of the Companys commitments as of September 30, 2009 is presented in the following
table (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual Obligations as of September 30, 2009 |
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
Total |
|
Debt (a) |
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
|
$ |
1.2 |
|
|
$ |
1.2 |
|
|
$ |
1.2 |
|
|
$ |
1.2 |
|
|
$ |
54.9 |
|
|
$ |
60.0 |
|
Operating leases |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
Loss and loss adjustment expense reserves |
|
|
31.0 |
|
|
|
135.7 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
54.2 |
|
|
|
34.2 |
|
|
|
73.2 |
|
|
|
428.3 |
|
Other long-term liabilities (b) |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
9.9 |
|
|
|
13.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
32.1 |
|
|
$ |
140.1 |
|
|
$ |
104.1 |
|
|
$ |
56.9 |
|
|
$ |
35.8 |
|
|
$ |
138.0 |
|
|
$ |
507.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Reflects expected principal and interest payments. |
|
(b) |
|
Reflects unfunded postretirement benefit plans and long-term incentive plan payments to certain executives. |
As an insurance holding company, CNA Surety is dependent upon dividends and other permitted
payments from its insurance subsidiaries to pay operating expenses and meet debt service
requirements, as well as to potentially pay cash dividends. The payment
37
of dividends by the insurance subsidiaries is subject to varying degrees of supervision by the
insurance regulatory authorities in the insurance subsidiaries states of domicile. Western Surety,
Surety Bonding Company of America (Surety Bonding) and Universal Surety of America (Universal
Surety) are domiciled in South Dakota. In South Dakota, insurance companies may only pay
dividends from earned surplus excluding surplus arising from unrealized capital gains or
revaluation of assets. The insurance subsidiaries may pay dividends without obtaining prior
regulatory approval only if such dividend or distribution (together with dividends or distributions
made within the preceding 12-month period) is less than, as of the end of the immediately preceding
year, the greater of (i) 10% of the insurers surplus to policyholders or (ii) statutory net
income. In South Dakota, net income includes net realized capital gains in an amount not to exceed
20% of net unrealized capital gains. All dividends must be reported to the South Dakota Division of
Insurance prior to payment.
The dividends that may be paid without prior regulatory approval are determined by formulas
established by the applicable insurance regulations, as described above. The formulas that
determine dividend capacity in the current year are dependent on, among other items, the prior
years ending statutory surplus and statutory net income. Dividend capacity for 2009 is based on
statutory surplus and income at and for the year ended December 31, 2008. Without prior regulatory
approval in 2009, Western Surety may pay dividends of $108.5 million to CNA Surety. CNA Surety
received dividends of $2.0 million from its insurance subsidiaries during the first nine months of
2009. CNA Surety received no dividends from its non-insurance subsidiaries during the first nine
months of 2009. CNA Surety received $3.0 million in dividends from its insurance subsidiaries and
no dividends from its non-insurance subsidiaries during the first nine months of 2008.
Combined statutory surplus totaled $626.9 million at September 30, 2009, resulting in an
annualized net written premium to statutory surplus ratio of to 0.7 to 1. Insurance regulations
restrict Western Suretys maximum net retention on a single surety bond to 10 percent of statutory
surplus. Under the 2009 Excess of Loss Treaty, the Companys net retention on new bonds would
generally be $15 million plus a 5% co-participation in the $90 million layer of excess reinsurance
above the Companys retention. Based on statutory surplus as of September 30, 2009, this regulation
would limit Western Suretys largest gross risk to $148.2 million. This surplus requirement may
limit the amount of future dividends Western Surety could otherwise pay to CNA Surety.
In accordance with the provisions of intercompany tax sharing agreements between CNA Surety
and its subsidiaries, the income tax of each subsidiary shall be determined based upon each
subsidiarys separate return liability. Intercompany tax payments are made at such times when
estimated tax payments would be required by the Internal Revenue Service. CNA Surety received tax
sharing payments of $29.3 million and $30.1 million from its subsidiaries for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008, respectively.
Western Surety and Surety Bonding each qualify as an acceptable surety for federal and other
public works project bonds pursuant to U.S. Department of Treasury regulations. U.S. Treasury
underwriting limitations, the maximum net retention on a single federal surety bond, are based on
an insurers statutory surplus. Effective July 1, 2008 through June 30, 2009, the underwriting
limitations of Western Surety and Surety Bonding were $43.5 million and $0.7 million, respectively.
Effective July 1, 2009 through June 30, 2010, the underwriting limitations of Western Surety and
Surety Bonding are $54.7 million and $0.7 million, respectively. Through the Quota Share Treaty
previously discussed, CNA Surety has access to CCC and its affiliates U.S. Department of Treasury
underwriting limitations. Effective July 1, 2008 through June 30, 2009, the underwriting
limitations of CCC and its affiliates utilized under the Quota Share Treaty totaled $783.7 million.
Effective July 1, 2009 through June 30, 2010, the underwriting limitations of CCC and its
affiliates utilized under the Quota Share Treaty total $732.3 million. CNA Surety management
believes that the foregoing U.S. Treasury underwriting limitations are sufficient for the conduct
of its business.
CNA Surety management believes that the Company has sufficient available resources, including
capital protection against large losses provided by the Companys excess of loss reinsurance
arrangements, to meet its present capital needs.
Insurance Regulation and Supervision
CNA Suretys insurance subsidiaries are subject to regulation and supervision by the various
insurance regulatory authorities of the states in which they conduct business. Such supervision
includes periodic financial and market conduct examinations. These examinations are generally
performed by the domiciliary state insurance regulatory authorities; however, they may be performed
by any jurisdiction in which the insurer transacts business. During 2008, the South Dakota Division
of Insurance began preliminary work on its financial examination of Western Surety, Surety Bonding
and Universal Surety as of and for the period January 1, 2004 through December 31, 2008. The
information systems portion of the examination was completed in March 2009 and the Companys
responses to the comments and recommendations provided were comprehensive and will be summarized in
the final report. Based on the ongoing financial portion of the examination, the Company has also
received certain preliminary comments and recommendations,
38
none of which have had a material impact on the statutory results of operations and financial
condition of its insurance subsidiaries. The Company has responded to these as appropriate and does
not expect any further results of the ongoing examination to have a material impact on the results
of operations or financial condition of its insurance subsidiaries.
Financial Condition
Investment Portfolio
The estimated fair value, gross unrealized gains, gross unrealized losses, other-than
temporary impairments (OTTI) and amortized cost of fixed income securities and the fair value,
gross unrealized gains, gross unrealized losses and cost of equity securities held by CNA Surety at
September 30, 2009, by investment category, were as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross Unrealized Losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized Cost |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Less Than |
|
|
More Than |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
or Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
12 Months |
|
|
12 Months |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
OTTI Losses(a) |
|
Fixed income securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of
U.S. Government and agencies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury |
|
$ |
17,377 |
|
|
$ |
1,115 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
18,492 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
U.S. Agencies |
|
|
24,303 |
|
|
|
429 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,732 |
|
|
|
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations residential |
|
|
31,626 |
|
|
|
1,810 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,436 |
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage pass-through securities residential |
|
|
56,785 |
|
|
|
2,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions |
|
|
700,001 |
|
|
|
48,091 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,271 |
) |
|
|
745,821 |
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
292,550 |
|
|
|
13,219 |
|
|
|
(128 |
) |
|
|
(633 |
) |
|
|
305,008 |
|
|
|
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations commercial |
|
|
10,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(425 |
) |
|
|
9,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other asset-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second mortgages/home equity loans residential |
|
|
5,931 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(611 |
) |
|
|
5,320 |
|
|
|
(1,502 |
) |
Consumer credit receivables |
|
|
16,386 |
|
|
|
670 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,056 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
9,725 |
|
|
|
735 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,460 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed income securities |
|
|
1,164,709 |
|
|
|
68,641 |
|
|
|
(128 |
) |
|
|
(3,940 |
) |
|
|
1,229,282 |
|
|
$ |
(1,502 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities |
|
|
1,379 |
|
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,553 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,166,088 |
|
|
$ |
68,815 |
|
|
$ |
(128 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,940 |
) |
|
$ |
1,230,835 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The unrealized loss position
of this security has improved to $0.4 million at September 30, 2009. |
The estimated fair value, gross unrealized gains, gross unrealized losses and amortized cost
of fixed income securities and the fair value, gross unrealized gains, gross unrealized losses and
cost of equity securities held by CNA Surety at December 31, 2008, by investment category, were as
follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross Unrealized Losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized Cost |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Less Than |
|
|
More Than |
|
|
Estimated |
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
or Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
12 Months |
|
|
12 Months |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Fixed income securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of
U.S. Government and agencies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury |
|
$ |
33,140 |
|
|
$ |
3,519 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
36,659 |
|
U.S. Agencies |
|
|
36,476 |
|
|
|
1,116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,592 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations residential |
|
|
35,671 |
|
|
|
984 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,655 |
|
Mortgage pass-through securities residential |
|
|
72,203 |
|
|
|
1,489 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,692 |
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions |
|
|
697,305 |
|
|
|
19,730 |
|
|
|
(6,929 |
) |
|
|
(13,943 |
) |
|
|
696,163 |
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
96,048 |
|
|
|
1,711 |
|
|
|
(2,430 |
) |
|
|
(1,853 |
) |
|
|
93,476 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations commercial |
|
|
35,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,040 |
) |
|
|
(3,607 |
) |
|
|
29,378 |
|
Other asset-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second mortgages/home equity loans residential |
|
|
7,956 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(779 |
) |
|
|
(2,180 |
) |
|
|
4,997 |
|
Consumer credit receivables |
|
|
17,239 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,708 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,531 |
|
Other |
|
|
10,753 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
(273 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,503 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed income securities |
|
|
1,041,816 |
|
|
|
28,572 |
|
|
|
(14,159 |
) |
|
|
(21,583 |
) |
|
|
1,034,646 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
1,231 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,231 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,043,047 |
|
|
$ |
28,572 |
|
|
$ |
(14,159 |
) |
|
$ |
(21,583 |
) |
|
$ |
1,035,877 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
The following table provides the composition of fixed income securities with an unrealized
loss at September 30, 2009 in relation to the total of all fixed income securities in an unrealized
loss position by contractual maturities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
% of |
|
|
Fair |
|
Unrealized |
Contractual Maturity |
|
Value |
|
Loss |
Due after one year through five years |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
16 |
% |
Due after five years through ten years |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Due after ten years |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
Asset-backed securities |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes for fixed income securities in an unrealized loss position at
September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 the aggregate fair value and gross unrealized loss by
length of time those securities have been continuously in an unrealized loss position (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
Unrealized Loss Aging |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
Fixed income securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment grade(a): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-6 months |
|
$ |
31,910 |
|
|
$ |
84 |
|
|
$ |
109,973 |
|
|
$ |
3,095 |
|
7-12 months |
|
|
4,937 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
121,419 |
|
|
|
11,064 |
|
13-24 months |
|
|
11,630 |
|
|
|
261 |
|
|
|
81,395 |
|
|
|
12,010 |
|
Greater than 24 months |
|
|
36,917 |
|
|
|
2,099 |
|
|
|
33,450 |
|
|
|
9,573 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment grade |
|
|
85,394 |
|
|
|
2,488 |
|
|
|
346,237 |
|
|
|
35,742 |
|
Non-investment grade: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greater than 24 months |
|
|
17,700 |
|
|
|
1,580 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
103,094 |
|
|
$ |
4,068 |
|
|
$ |
346,237 |
|
|
$ |
35,742 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Investment grade is determined by using the Standard & Poors (S&P) rating.
If a security is not rated by S&P, the Moodys Investor Services (Moodys)
rating is used. As of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, all of the
Companys fixed income securities were rated by S&P or Moodys. |
Management believes the Company has the ability to hold all fixed income securities to
maturity. However, the Company may dispose of securities prior to their scheduled maturity due to
changes in interest rates, prepayments, tax and credit considerations, liquidity or regulatory
capital requirements, or other similar factors. As a result, the Company considers all of its fixed
income securities (bonds) and equity securities as available-for-sale, and as such, they are
carried at fair value.
A security is in an unrealized loss position, or impaired, if the fair value of the security
is less than its amortized cost adjusted for accretion, amortization and previously recorded OTTI
losses. When a security is impaired, the impairment is evaluated to determine whether it is
temporary or other-than-temporary.
A significant judgment in the valuation of investments is the determination of when an
other-than-temporary decline in value has occurred. The Company follows a consistent and systematic
process for identifying securities that sustain other-than-temporary declines in value. The Company
has established a watch list that is reviewed by the Chief Financial Officer and one other
executive officer on at least a quarterly basis. The watch list includes individual securities that
fall below certain thresholds or that exhibit evidence of impairment indicators including, but not
limited to, a significant adverse change in the financial condition and near-term prospects of the
investment or a significant adverse change in legal factors, the business climate or credit
ratings.
When a security is placed on the watch list, it is monitored for further market value changes
and additional news related to the issuers financial condition. The focus is on objective evidence
that may influence the evaluation of impairment factors. The decision to record an
other-than-temporary impairment loss incorporates both quantitative criteria and qualitative
information.
In determining whether an equity security is other-than-temporarily impaired, the Company
considers a number of factors including, but not limited to: (a) the length of time and the extent
to which the market value has been less than book value, (b) the
40
financial condition and near-term
prospects of the issuer, (c) the intent and ability of the Company to retain its investment for a
period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in value and (d) general market
conditions and industry or sector specific factors. Currently, the Companys equity portfolio is
comprised solely of mutual funds related to the Companys deferred compensation plan, which is an
unfunded, nonqualified deferred compensation plan for a select group of management or highly
compensated employees. Due to the nature of the plan, the Company does not assert the ability to
hold these securities until their recovery in value. As such, if any of these securities are in an
unrealized loss position, they are considered to be other-than-temporarily impaired.
For equity securities for which an other-than-temporary impairment loss has been identified,
the security is written down to fair value and the resulting losses are recognized in realized
gains/losses in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.
Fixed income securities in an unrealized loss position that the Company intends to sell, or it
more likely than not will be required to sell before recovery of amortized cost, are considered to
be other-than-temporarily impaired. These securities are written down to fair value and the
resulting losses are recognized in realized gains/losses in the Condensed Consolidated Statements
of Income.
The remaining fixed income securities in an unrealized loss position are evaluated to
determine if a credit loss exists. To determine if a credit loss exists, the Company considers a
number of factors including, but not limited to: (a) the financial condition and near-term
prospects of the issuer, (b) credit ratings of the securities, (c) whether the debtor is current on
interest and principal payments, (d) the length of time and the extent to which the market value has
been less than book value and (e) general market conditions and industry or sector specific
factors.
In addition to these factors, the Company considers the results of discounted cash flow
modeling using assumptions representative of current market conditions as well as those specific to
the Companys particular security holdings. For asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities, the
focus of this analysis is on assessing the sufficiency and quality of underlying collateral and
timing of cash flows. If the discounted expected cash flows for a security equal or exceed the
amortized cost of that security, no credit loss exists and the security is deemed to be temporarily
impaired.
Fixed income securities in an unrealized loss position for which management believes a credit
loss exists are considered to be other-than-temporarily impaired. For these fixed income
securities, the Company bifurcates OTTI losses into a credit component and a non-credit component.
The credit component, which represents the difference between the discounted expected cash flows
and the fixed income securitys amortized cost, is recognized in earnings. The non-credit component
is recognized in other comprehensive income and represents the difference between fair value and
the discounted cash flows that the Company expects to collect.
At September 30, 2009, the Company holds 271 fixed income securities in an unrealized gain
position with a total estimated fair value of $1,126.2 million and an aggregate gross unrealized
gain of $68.6 million.
41
The following table summarizes securities in a gross unrealized loss position by investment
category and by credit rating. The table also discloses the corresponding count of securities in an
unrealized loss position and estimated fair value by category (in thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Unrealized Losses |
|
|
Estimated |
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
AAA |
|
|
AA |
|
|
A |
|
|
BBB |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Count |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Fixed income securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment grade(a): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U. S.
Government and agencies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations residential |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions |
|
|
389 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
618 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,107 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
29,887 |
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
630 |
|
|
|
761 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
43,225 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations commercial |
|
|
425 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
425 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
9,600 |
|
Other asset-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second mortgages/home equity loans residential |
|
|
195 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
195 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2,681 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment grade |
|
|
1,015 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
729 |
|
|
|
630 |
|
|
|
2,488 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
85,394 |
|
Non-investment grade: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,164 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
15,061 |
|
Other asset-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second mortgages/home equity loans residential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
416 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2,639 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-investment grade |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,580 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
17,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,015 |
|
|
$ |
114 |
|
|
$ |
729 |
|
|
$ |
630 |
|
|
$ |
4,068 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
$ |
103,094 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Securities are categorized using the S&P rating. If a security is not rated by S&P, the
Moodys rating is used. At September 30, 2009, all of the Companys fixed income securities
were rated by S&P or Moodys. |
The Company holds three non-investment grade securities in an unrealized loss position at
September 30, 2009. Two of these, obligations of states and political subdivisions issued by
governmental utility authorities, were downgraded below investment grade during the third quarter
2009 due to the downgrade of the mono-line bond insurer guaranteeing a portion of these securities.
Despite the downgrade, the unrealized loss on these securities
improved from $0.9 million, or 16.7% of
amortized cost, and $2.5 million, or 22.6% of amortized cost at June 30, 2009 to
$0.3 million, or 5.0% of amortized cost and $0.9 million, or 8.3% of amortized
cost, respectively, at September 30, 2009. Based on the underlying fundamentals of these securities, the Company continues to believe
that all interest and principal will be paid according to their contractual terms. The Company does
not believe the unrealized losses on these securities are indicative of credit losses and,
as such, has not recorded an OTTI loss for these securities at September 30,
2009.
The other security rated below investment grade and in an unrealized loss position is an
asset-backed security collateralized by sub-prime home loans originated prior to 2005. This
security was determined to be other-than-temporarily impaired at June 30, 2009. The Company
recorded OTTI losses of $0.1 million in earnings in addition to recording an unrealized loss of
$1.7 million in other comprehensive income. The Company did not record any additional
credit-related loss on this security during the third quarter and the unrealized loss position has
improved to $0.4 million, or 13.6% of its adjusted amortized cost. The Company holds one other
asset-backed security collateralized by sub-prime home loans originated prior to 2005. This
security has an estimated fair value of $2.7 million and is in an unrealized loss position of $0.2
million, or 6.8% of its amortized cost, at September 30, 2009. The Company believes the unrealized
losses on these securities with sub-prime exposure are primarily attributable to broader economic
conditions and liquidity concerns and are not indicative of the quality of the underlying
collateral. In the first nine months of 2009, the Company received repayments
on these securities of $1.9 million, or 24% of the par value outstanding at December 31, 2008.
Of the 19 investment grade securities in an unrealized loss position, one was in a loss
position that exceeded 20% of the securitys amortized cost. This security, issued by a large
student loan provider, which has an unrealized loss of 20.9% of amortized cost, was also the
largest unrealized loss in dollars ($0.6 million). Three other securities were in an unrealized
loss position that exceeded 5% of each securitys amortized cost. Gross unrealized losses on the
Companys fixed income portfolio have continued to improve from $35.7 million at December 31, 2008,
$31.8 million at March 31, 2009 and $19.0 million at June 30, 2009. The Company believes that the
unrealized losses are primarily due to credit spread widening, and to a lesser extent, market
illiquidity and certain asset classes being out of favor with investors.
42
The Company holds two commercial collateralized mortgage-backed securities. At September 30,
2009, one of these securities had an unrealized loss of $0.1 million, or 2.0% of its amortized
cost, and the other had an unrealized loss of $0.3 million, or 6.5% of its amortized cost. The
overall unrealized loss position of these securities has continued to improve from $2.5 million at
March 31, 2009 and $1.5 million at June 30, 2009. The Company believes that these securities will
recover in value based on the current performance of the underlying collateral, the senior or
super-senior position of each of the holdings and the amount of credit support available to our
holdings.
As of September 30, 2009, $412.7 million of the Companys investments were guaranteed by one
of three major mono-line bond insurers. This includes $405.0 million of bonds of states and
political obligations, or about 54% of the Companys investments in this category of security.
Investments in obligations of states and political subdivisions represent approximately 61% of the
Companys invested assets. The ratings on these securities reflect the higher of the underlying
rating of the issuer or the insurers rating. Of the $405.0 million of bonds that were insured,
only $97.9 million of these securities reflect credit rating enhancement due to the guarantee. The
underlying ratings of the enhanced securities are $55.2 million AA, $42.2 million A and $0.5
million BBB. The underlying ratings of all municipal holdings remain very strong and carry an
average rating of AA. The Company views bond insurance as credit enhancement and not credit
substitution and a credit review is performed on each issuer of bonds purchased. Based on the
strong underlying credit quality of its insured bonds of states and political subdivisions, the
Company believes that any impact of potential ratings downgrades or other difficulties of the
mono-line bond insurers would not have a significant impact on the Companys financial position or
results of operations.
The Company has no current intent to sell any of the securities in an unrealized loss
position, nor is it more likely than not that it will be required to sell these securities prior to
recovery of amortized cost. The Company believes that all of the securities in an unrealized loss
position will recover in value and that none of these unrealized losses were indicative of credit
losses. Based on the current facts and circumstances of the Companys particular security holdings,
the Company has determined that no additional OTTI losses related to the securities in an
unrealized loss position are required to be recorded.
Invested assets are exposed to various risks, such as interest rate, market and credit risks.
Due to the level of risk associated with certain of these invested assets and the level of
uncertainty related to changes in the value of these assets, it is possible that changes in risks
in the near term may significantly affect the amounts reported in the Condensed Consolidated
Balance Sheets and Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.
Impact of Pending Accounting Standards
In June 2009, the FASB issued guidance which removes the concept of a qualifying
special-purpose entity and eliminates it from exceptions under the guidance for consolidation of
variable interest entities. This guidance also modifies the de-recognition conditions related to
legal isolation and effective control and adds additional disclosure requirements for transfers of
financial assets. This guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after November
15, 2009. The adoption is not expected to have a material impact on the Companys financial
condition or results of operations.
In June 2009, the FASB issued guidance which amends existing consolidation guidance applicable
for variable interest entities as well as requirements for determination of the primary beneficiary
of a variable interest entity, requires an ongoing assessment of whether an entity is the primary
beneficiary and requires enhanced disclosures that will provide users of financial statements
information regarding an enterprises involvement in a variable interest entity. This guidance is
effective for annual reporting periods beginning after November 15, 2009. The adoption is not
expected to have a material impact on the Companys financial condition or results of operations.
In August 2009, the FASB issued guidance which proposes the following clarifications guidance
for determining the fair value of a liability. If a quoted price in an active market for the
identical liability is available, it represents a Level 1 measurement. If a quoted price in an
active market for the identical liability is not available, an entity may utilize the following
approaches: (a) the quoted price of the identical liability when traded as an asset in an active
market; (b) the quoted price of the identical liability when traded as an asset in markets that are
not active; (c) the quoted price for similar liabilities or similar liabilities traded as assets in
markets that are not active; (d) another valuation technique that is consistent with the generally
accepted fair value principles (income approach or market approach). The Company does not carry any
of its financial liabilities at fair value. This guidance is effective for financial statements
issued for annual periods beginning after August 2009. The adoption is not expected to have an
impact on the Companys financial condition or results of operations.
43
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This report includes a number of statements, which relate to anticipated future events
(forward-looking statements) rather than actual present conditions or historical events.
Forward-looking statements generally include words such as believes, expects, intends,
anticipates, estimates and similar expressions. Forward-looking statements in this report
include expected developments in the Companys insurance business, including losses and loss
reserves; the impact of routine ongoing insurance reserve reviews being conducted by the Company;
the routine state regulatory examinations of the Companys primary insurance company subsidiaries,
and the Companys responses to the results of those reviews and examinations; the Companys
expectations concerning its revenues, earnings, expenses and investment activities; expected cost
savings and other results from the Companys expense reduction and restructuring activities; and
the Companys proposed actions in response to trends in its business.
Forward-looking statements, by their nature, are subject to a variety of inherent risks and
uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results projected. Many
of these risks and uncertainties cannot be controlled by the Company.
Some examples of these risks and uncertainties are:
|
|
|
general economic and business conditions; |
|
|
|
|
changes in financial markets such as fluctuations in interest rates, long-term periods of
low interest rates, credit conditions and currency, commodity and stock prices; |
|
|
|
|
the ability of the Companys contract principals to fulfill their bonded obligations; |
|
|
|
|
the effects of corporate bankruptcies on surety bond claims, as well as on capital
markets; |
|
|
|
|
changes in foreign or domestic political, social and economic conditions; |
|
|
|
|
regulatory initiatives and compliance with governmental regulations, judicial decisions,
including interpretation of policy provisions, decisions regarding coverage, trends in
litigation and the outcome of any litigation involving the Company, and rulings and changes
in tax laws and regulations; |
|
|
|
|
regulatory limitations, impositions and restrictions upon the Company, including the
effects of assessments and other surcharges for guaranty funds and other mandatory pooling
arrangements; |
|
|
|
|
the impact of competitive products, policies and pricing and the competitive environment
in which the Company operates, including changes in the Companys books of business; |
|
|
|
|
product and policy availability and demand and market responses, including the level of
ability to obtain rate increases and decline or non-renew underpriced accounts, to achieve
premium targets and profitability and to realize growth and retention estimates; |
|
|
|
|
development of claims and the impact on loss reserves, including changes in claim
settlement practices; |
|
|
|
|
the performance of reinsurance companies under reinsurance contracts with the Company; |
|
|
|
|
results of financing efforts, including the Companys ability to access capital markets; |
|
|
|
|
changes in the Companys composition of operating segments; |
|
|
|
|
the sufficiency of the Companys loss reserves and the possibility of future increases in
reserves; |
|
|
|
|
the risks and uncertainties associated with the Companys loss reserves; and, |
|
|
|
|
the possibility of further changes in the Companys ratings by ratings agencies,
including the inability to access certain markets or distribution channels and the required
collateralization of future payment obligations as a result of such changes, and changes in
rating agency policies and practices. |
44
Any forward-looking statements made in this report are made by the Company as of the date of
this report. The Company does not have any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking
statement contained in this report, even if the Companys expectations or any related events,
conditions or circumstances change.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
CNA Suretys investment portfolio is subject to economic losses due to adverse changes in the
fair value of its financial instruments, or market risk. Interest rate risk represents the largest
market risk factor affecting the Companys consolidated financial condition due to its significant
level of investments in fixed income securities. Increases and decreases in prevailing interest
rates generally translate into decreases and increases in the fair value of the Companys fixed
income portfolio. The fair value of these interest rate sensitive instruments may also be affected
by the credit-worthiness of the issuer, prepayment options, relative value of alternative
investments, the liquidity of the instrument, income tax considerations and general market
conditions. The Company manages its exposure to interest rate risk primarily through an
asset/liability matching strategy. The Companys exposure to interest rate risk is mitigated by the
relative short-term nature of its insurance and other liabilities. The targeted effective duration
of the Companys investment portfolio is approximately 5 years, consistent with the expected
duration of its insurance and other liabilities.
The tables below summarize the estimated effects of certain hypothetical increases and
decreases in interest rates. It is assumed that the changes occur immediately and uniformly across
each investment category. The hypothetical changes in market interest rates selected at September
30, 2009 reflect the Companys expectations of the reasonably possible scenarios over a one-year
period. The hypothetical fair values are based upon the same prepayment assumptions that were
utilized in computing fair values as of September 30, 2009. At December 31, 2008, the hypothetical
changes in market interest rates reflected the Companys expectations of the reasonably possible
best or worst case scenarios over a one year period. Significant variations in market interest
rates could produce changes in the timing of repayments due to prepayment options available. The
fair value of such instruments could be affected and therefore actual results might differ from
those reflected in the following tables.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hypothetical |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Fair |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hypothetical |
|
|
Value After |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
Fair Value at |
|
|
Change in |
|
|
Hypothetical |
|
|
(Decrease) in |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
Interest Rate |
|
|
Change in |
|
|
Stockholders |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
(bp=basis points) |
|
|
Interest Rate |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
U.S. Government and government agencies and
authorities |
|
$ |
136,017 |
|
|
200 bp increase |
|
$ |
128,504 |
|
|
|
(0.6 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
150 bp increase |
|
|
130,735 |
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 bp increase |
|
|
132,828 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 bp increase |
|
|
134,628 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
States, municipalities and political subdivisions |
|
|
745,821 |
|
|
200 bp increase |
|
|
656,703 |
|
|
|
(6.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
150 bp increase |
|
|
677,733 |
|
|
|
(5.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 bp increase |
|
|
699,591 |
|
|
|
(3.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 bp increase |
|
|
722,285 |
|
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
305,008 |
|
|
200 bp increase |
|
|
274,816 |
|
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
150 bp increase |
|
|
281,956 |
|
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 bp increase |
|
|
289,360 |
|
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 bp increase |
|
|
297,040 |
|
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed and asset-backed |
|
|
42,436 |
|
|
200 bp increase |
|
|
40,203 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
150 bp increase |
|
|
40,743 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 bp increase |
|
|
41,295 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 bp increase |
|
|
41,859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed income securities available-for-sale |
|
$ |
1,229,282 |
|
|
200 bp increase |
|
|
1,100,226 |
|
|
|
(9.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
150 bp increase |
|
|
1,131,167 |
|
|
|
(7.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 bp increase |
|
|
1,163,074 |
|
|
|
(4.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 bp increase |
|
|
1,195,812 |
|
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hypothetical |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Fair |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hypothetical |
|
|
Value After |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
Fair Value at |
|
|
Change in |
|
|
Hypothetical |
|
|
(Decrease) in |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
Interest Rate |
|
|
Change in |
|
|
Stockholders |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
(bp=basis points) |
|
|
Interest Rate |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
U.S. Government and government agencies and
authorities |
|
$ |
184,598 |
|
|
200 bp increase |
|
$ |
172,966 |
|
|
|
(1.0 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 bp increase |
|
|
179,485 |
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 bp decrease |
|
|
187,485 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200 bp decrease |
|
|
189,197 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
States, municipalities and political subdivisions |
|
|
696,163 |
|
|
200 bp increase |
|
|
613,030 |
|
|
|
(7.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 bp increase |
|
|
652,614 |
|
|
|
(3.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 bp decrease |
|
|
743,635 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200 bp decrease |
|
|
786,829 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
93,476 |
|
|
200 bp increase |
|
|
84,743 |
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 bp increase |
|
|
88,962 |
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 bp decrease |
|
|
98,115 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200 bp decrease |
|
|
101,424 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed and asset-backed |
|
|
60,409 |
|
|
200 bp increase |
|
|
56,769 |
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 bp increase |
|
|
58,563 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 bp decrease |
|
|
62,039 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200 bp decrease |
|
|
62,557 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed income securities available-for-sale |
|
$ |
1,034,646 |
|
|
200 bp increase |
|
|
927,508 |
|
|
|
(9.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 bp increase |
|
|
979,624 |
|
|
|
(4.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 bp decrease |
|
|
1,091,274 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200 bp decrease |
|
|
1,140,007 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
The Company maintains a system of disclosure controls and procedures which are designed to
ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits
to the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, including
this report, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported on a timely basis. These disclosure
controls and procedures include controls and procedures designed to ensure that information
required to be disclosed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the Companys
management on a timely basis to allow decisions regarding required disclosure.
The Companys principal executive officer and its principal financial officer undertook an
evaluation of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a 15(e) and 15d 15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this report and concluded that
the Companys controls and procedures were effective.
There were no changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the Companys last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS Information on the Companys legal proceedings is set forth in Note 8
of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included under Part 1, Item 1.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS Information on the Companys risk factors is set forth in Item 1A Risk
Factors in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year-ended December 31, 2008.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS None.
46
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES None.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS None.
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION Reports on Form 8-K:
July 31, 2009; CNA Surety Corporation Earnings Press Release issued on July 31, 2009.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit Number |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule
13a14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 |
|
|
31(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule
13a14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 |
|
|
31(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
32(1 |
)* |
|
|
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
32(2 |
)* |
|
|
|
* |
|
Exhibits 32(1) and 32(2) are being furnished and shall not be deemed filed for the purpose
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the
liabilities of that Section. These Exhibits shall not be incorporated by reference into any
registration statement or other document pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. |
47
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has
duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
CNA SURETY CORPORATION (Registrant) |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ John F. Welch
John F. Welch
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ John F. Corcoran
John F. Corcoran
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: October 30, 2009 |
|
|
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
31(1)
|
|
Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Chief Executive Officer. |
|
|
|
31(2)
|
|
Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Chief Financial Officer. |
|
|
|
32(1)
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Chief Executive Officer. |
|
|
|
32(2)
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Chief Financial Officer. |