e10vk
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
|
|
|
þ |
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission File Number 0-7616
AVATAR HOLDINGS INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
23-1739078 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
201 Alhambra Circle, Coral Gables, Florida
|
|
33134 |
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code (305) 442-7000
Securities registered pursuant to section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
Title of each class
|
|
Name of each exchange on which registered |
|
|
|
Common Stock, $1.00 Par Value
|
|
The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of
the Securities Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or
Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is
not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in
definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of the Form 10-K
or any amendment to this Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of large accelerated filer,
accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check
one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer: o
|
|
Accelerated filer: þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer: o
|
|
Smaller reporting company: o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the
registrant was $113,972,270 as of June 30, 2009.
As of March 12, 2010, there were 11,355,451 shares of common stock, $1.00 par value, issued and
outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrants Proxy Statement for its 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are
incorporated by reference into Part III.
AVATAR HOLDINGS INC.
2009 FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain statements discussed in Item 1 (Business), Item 3 (Legal Proceedings), Item 7
(Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations), and
elsewhere in this Form 10-K constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements involve known and
unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors that could cause the actual results,
performance or achievements of results to differ materially from any future results, performance or
achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such risks, uncertainties and
other important factors include, among others: the stability of certain financial markets;
disruption of the credit markets and reduced availability and more stringent financing requirements
for commercial and residential mortgages of all types; the number of investor and speculator resale
homes for sale and homes in foreclosure in our communities and in the geographic areas in which we
develop and sell homes; the increased level of unemployment; the decline in net worth and/or of
income of potential buyers; the decline in consumer confidence; the failure to successfully
implement our business strategy; shifts in demographic trends affecting demand for active adult and
primary housing; the level of immigration and migration into the areas in which we conduct real
estate activities; our access to financing; construction defect and home warranty claims; changes
in, or the failure or inability to comply with, government regulations; and other factors as are
described in Item 1A (Risk Factors) of this Form 10-K. At least 80% of active adult homes are
intended for occupancy by at least one person 55 years or older.
Dollar amounts specified herein are in thousands, except per share amounts or as otherwise
indicated.
PART I
Item 1. Business
General
Avatar Holdings Inc. was incorporated in the state of Delaware in 1970. Our principal
executive offices are located at 201 Alhambra Circle, Coral Gables, Florida 33134 (telephone (305)
442-7000).
We are engaged in the business of real estate operations in Florida and Arizona. Our
residential community development activities have been adversely affected in both markets, bringing
development in our active adult and primary residential communities to a low level. We also engage
in other real estate activities, such as the operation of amenities, the sale for third-party
development of commercial and industrial land and the operation of a title insurance agency, which
activities have also been adversely affected by economic conditions.
3
Item 1. Business continued
Business Strategy
Our primary business strategy continues to be the development of lifestyle communities,
including active adult and primary residential communities, as well as the development and
construction of housing on scattered lots. However, due to the significant deterioration in the
economy and the residential real estate business, we have increased our focus on maintaining the
integrity of our balance sheet through preservation of capital, sustaining liquidity and reduction
of overhead. Our development activities have been and will continue to be minimal as we work
through the negative impacts on the homebuilding industry. We continue to evaluate the economic
feasibility of other real estate activities or unrelated businesses. While our homebuilding
operations are at a low level, our business remains capital intensive and requires or may require
expenditures for land and infrastructure development, housing construction, funding of operating
deficits and working capital, as well as potential new acquisition and development opportunities.
Recent Business Developments
We remain focused on maintaining sufficient liquidity. It is our intention to continue to
monetize our inventory of unsold homes and many of our model homes in anticipation of introducing
new homes and models. We expect that these new products will include smaller and less amenitized
houses to enable us to sell homes at lower price points when the market recovers.
We have continued to defer the introduction of new housing products or recommencing
development activities in most of our existing communities until such times as we believe that our
markets would enable us to construct and sell new houses at an acceptable profit. However, we have
recommenced construction in Solivita and Solivita West on a limited basis and we are analyzing new
product models.
We continue to focus on acquiring real estate or real estate related assets as the fallout
from the deleveraging of the economy continues to adversely affect real estate values. We have
evaluated a substantial number of residential real estate properties in Florida and Arizona which
we believe could represent opportunities to acquire real estate, or debt secured by real estate, at
a substantial discount to its intrinsic value. On September 24, 2009, we acquired 87 completed and
partially completed homes, 267 developed lots, 364 partially developed lots and approximately 400
undeveloped master planned lots in a residential community located at Seasons at Tradition in St.
Lucie County, Florida. The purchase price was approximately $7,450. In addition, on December 3,
2009, we acquired 86 developed lots located at Estancias del Corazon, in Pima County, Arizona. The
purchase price was approximately $3,725.
We have an experienced residential real estate development group which is able to
expeditiously underwrite portfolios of residential real estate ranging from large
undeveloped/unentitled parcels of land to finished lots, and acquire these properties or the debt
secured by these properties from financial institutions or others. We believe our cash position and
our ability to plan, permit, develop and sell land, as well as to design, permit and build highly
amenitized residential communities enable us to have a competitive advantage in buying such
properties over financial buyers and developers not having extensive experience in Florida or
Arizona. However, we compete for opportunities to acquire real estate or real estate related assets
and there can be no assurance that we will identify and be able to acquire such assets or that any
such assets we were to acquire would result in a desirable return on our investment.
4
Item 1. Business continued
Recent Business Developments continued
On December 11, 2009, Frenchmans Yacht Club Developers, LLC (Frenchmans), a Florida
limited liability company in which our wholly-owned subsidiary, Avatar Properties Inc.
(Properties), is the sole member, sold its interest in the proposed development known as
Frenchmans Yacht Club to an unrelated third party for cash and a purchase money note of $4,208.
The amount of cash we received did not meet the criteria in authoritative accounting guidance to
record this sale under the full accrual method of profit recognition. As a result, this transaction
is accounted for under the cost recovery method. Under the cost recovery method, no profit is
recognized until cash payments by the buyer, including principal and interest on the purchase money
note due to us, exceeds the cost of the property sold. In the Frenchmans transaction, since we sold
the property at a loss, in accordance with authoritative accounting guidance we recognized the loss
of approximately $3,800 in full. The note receivable was discounted by $1,291 to the fair value for
purposes of measuring the loss on this transaction. Additionally, future interest cash receipts
will be recorded as deferred income, and presented as a reduction to the note receivable until such
time that the cumulative cash payments by the buyer exceed Avatars book value in the property at
the time of sale.
On December 21, 2009, Properties entered into three separate agreements with unrelated third
parties providing for the formation of three separate limited liability companies (LLCs). Banyan
Bay Development Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Properties, sold partially developed lots
and unplatted land to one of the LLCs for cash and a purchase money note. Properties also entered
into a land option contract with the LLC for certain of the Banyan Bay land. Properties sold its
partially developed but unplatted lots in Cory Lake Isles to another of the LLCs for cash.
Properties sold its Terralargo club facilities, developed and undeveloped platted lots and
undeveloped land to the third LLC for cash and a purchase money note. Properties also entered into
a land option contract with the LLC for certain of the Terralargo land. Properties acquired a
minority equity interest in each of the LLCs and participates in the management of each of the
LLCs. The land option contracts provide us the right, but not the obligation, to acquire a
specified number of developed lots at agreed upon prices.
In accordance with authoritative accounting guidance, we determined that these LLCs qualify
as variable interest entities (VIEs) which requires consolidation by the entity determined to be
the primary beneficiary. The primary beneficiary is the party determined to absorb the majority of
the VIEs expected losses, receives a majority of the VIEs expected residual returns, or both. As
a result of our analyses, we determined Avatar holds a variable interest in the VIEs through the
purchase money notes, the land option contracts and an economic interest in these LLCs. Based on
our analysis, we determined that we are the primary beneficiary of the LLCs related to the Banyan
bay and Terralargo transactions. As a result, for financial reporting purposes, these transactions
were not sales and therefore the assets remain in our financial statements. Avatar recorded an
impairment charge of approximately $11,919 for the year ended December 31, 2009 related to the
inventory of these properties.
During 2009, we filed a shelf registration statement on Form S-3 for $500,000 of debt and
equity securities, which was supplemented in September 2009 by a supplemental prospectus for a
public offering of shares of our Common Stock, underwritten by Barclays Capital Inc. (the
Underwriter). We agreed to sell to the Underwriter 2,250,000 shares of our Common Stock, which
were offered to the public at a price of $18.00 per share and discounted to the Underwriter to a
price of $17.10 per share. The Underwriter was granted an over-allotment option to purchase up to
an additional 337,500 shares of Common Stock, at the same offering price to the public and subject
to the same underwriting discount. The closing on the sale of the 2,250,000 shares of Common Stock
occurred on September 28, 2009. Net proceeds to us before expenses were $38,475. On October 6,
2009, we closed on the sale of an additional 264,391 shares of our Common Stock pursuant to the
Underwriters partial exercise of its option to purchase additional shares, which option expired on
October 23, 2009. Net proceeds of the partial exercise of the option were $4,521, resulting in
total net proceeds of the offering, after approximately $700 of offering expenses, of approximately
$42,296. We intend to use the proceeds from the sale for general corporate purposes, including,
without limitation, potential acquisitions of real estate and real estate-related assets.
5
Item 1. Business continued
Real Estate Operations
We are engaged in real estate operations as summarized below. For further information
please see Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.
Active Adult Community Development
Within the Central Florida master-planned community of Poinciana we have developed the
highly-amenitized active adult communities of Solivita and Solivita West. Solivita and Solivita
West incorporate the natural topography of the land, including more than 1,200 acres of wetlands
and an oak hammock. These communities currently include approximately 126,000 square feet of
recreation facilities, as well as two 18-hole golf courses and an active park housing a variety of
sporting and games facilities.
We have continued to defer the introduction of new housing products or recommencing
development activities in most of our existing communities until such times as we believe that our
markets would enable us to construct and sell new houses at an acceptable profit. However, we have
commenced construction in Solivita and Solivita West on a limited basis and we are analyzing new
product models.
On September 24, 2009, we acquired 87 completed and partially completed homes, 267 developed
lots, 364 partially developed lots and approximately 400 undeveloped master planned lots in an
active adult community named Seasons at Tradition located in St. Lucie County, Florida. We are
actively marketing the sale of the inventory homes in Seasons.
Information relating to our backlog is incorporated herein by reference to Item 7 of Part II
of this Report under the heading Results of Operations.
Primary Residential Community Development
We continue to defer the introduction of new housing products or recommencing development
activities in our primary communities, both on scattered lots and on contiguous parcels as part of
planned communities, in Florida and southeast Arizona, until such times as we believe that our
markets would enable us to construct and sell new houses at an acceptable profit. On December 3,
2009, we acquired 86 developed lots located at Estancias del Corazon, in Pima County, Arizona.
Information relating to our backlog is incorporated herein by reference to Item 7 of Part II
of this Report under the heading Results of Operations.
Poinciana Parkway and Toll Road
In December 2006, we entered into agreements with Osceola County, Florida and Polk County,
Florida for us to develop and construct at our cost a 9.66 mile four-lane road in Osceola and Polk
Counties, to be known as the Poinciana Parkway (the Poinciana Parkway). The Poinciana Parkway is
to include a 4.15 mile segment to be operated as a toll road. We have acquired right-of-way and
federal and state environmental permits necessary to construct the Poinciana Parkway. In July 2008
and August 2008, we entered into amended and restated agreements with Osceola County and Polk
County, pursuant to which construction is to be commenced by February 14, 2011. Construction was to
be completed by December 31, 2011 subject to extension for Force Majeure. We have notified the
Counties that the completion date has been extended to October 14, 2013 due to Force Majeure
related to the economic downturn. We advised the Counties that the current economic downturn has
resulted in our inability to: (i) conclude negotiations with potential investors; or (ii) obtain
financing for the construction of the Poinciana Parkway.
6
Item 1. Business continued
Real Estate Operations continued
If funding for the Poinciana Parkway is not obtained so that construction of the
Poinciana Parkway can be commenced by February 14, 2011 as required by our agreements with Osceola
County and Polk County, the Counties have no right to obtain damages or sue Avatar for specific
performance. Polk Countys sole remedy under its agreement with Avatar is to cancel such agreement
if Avatar does not construct the Poinciana Parkway. If the construction of the Parkway is not
funded and commenced by February 14, 2011, (i) a portion of Avatars land in Osceola County will
become subject to Osceola traffic concurrency requirements applicable generally to other home
builders in the County and (ii) Avatar will be required to contribute approximately $1,900 towards
the construction cost of certain traffic improvements in Osceola County that it otherwise might
have been obligated to build or fund if it had not agreed to construct the Poinciana Parkway.
Avatar is investigating the availability of an extension of the Poinciana Parkway permits and the
related deadlines in its agreements with the Counties.
Osceola County and Avatar were unsuccessful in their attempt to obtain a federal grant for
construction of the Parkway. Osceola County and Avatar are still attempting to obtain other
federal funds for development of the Poinciana Parkway, including tax appropriation and a federal
loan. We cannot predict whether any federal funds will be available.
For the Poinciana Parkway, indicators of impairment are general economic conditions, rate of
population growth and estimated change in traffic levels. If indicators are present, we perform an
impairment test in which the asset is reviewed for impairment by comparing the estimated future
undiscounted cash flows to be generated by the asset to its carrying value. If such cash flows are
less than the assets carrying value, the carrying value is written down to its estimated fair
value. In determining estimated future cash flows for purposes of the impairment test, we
incorporate current market assumptions based on general economic conditions such as anticipated
estimated revenues and estimated costs. These assumptions can significantly affect our estimates of
future cash flows.
Our estimate of the right-of-way acquisition, development and construction costs for the
Poinciana Parkway approximates $175,000 to $200,000. However, no assurance of the ultimate costs
can be given at this stage. As of December 31, 2009, approximately $47,000 has been expended.
During fiscal year 2008, we recorded impairment charges of $30,228, associated with the Poinciana
Parkway.
We review the recoverability of the carrying value of the Poinciana Parkway on a quarterly
basis in accordance with authoritative accounting guidance. Based on our reviews during 2009, we
determined the estimated future undiscounted cash flows of the Poinciana Parkway were less than its
carrying value. During 2009, we recognized impairment losses of $8,108. At December 31, 2009, the
carrying value of the Poinciana Parkway is $8,482. In addition, non-capitalizable expenditures of
$341 related to the Poinciana Parkway were expensed during 2009.
Commercial and Industrial
We may generate revenues through the sale of commercial and industrial land for third-party
development, primarily in Poinciana. Demand for, and values of, commercial, industrial and other
land has decreased significantly since 2008.
Real Estate Assets
Our assets consist primarily of real estate in the states of Florida and Arizona. As of
December 31, 2009, we own more than 16,000 acres and have a minority ownership interest in an
additional 830 acres of developed, partially developed or developable residential, commercial and
industrial property. Avatar is required to consolidate these LLCs in accordance with
authoritative accounting guidance. Some portion of these acres may be developed as roads,
retention ponds, parks, school sites, community amenities or for other similar uses.
7
Item 1. Business continued
Real Estate Assets continued
Within Florida and Arizona we also own more than 15,000 acres of preserves, wetlands,
open space and other areas that at this time are not developable, permitable and/or economically
feasible to develop, but may at some future date have an economic value for preservation or
conservation purposes.
For further description of the various communities and the operations conducted therein,
please see Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.
Following is a breakdown of our land holdings (not including our housing inventory) as of
December 31, 2009 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Planned Lots/Units (1) |
|
|
|
|
Acquisition |
|
Contract |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partially |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book |
|
Date |
|
Date |
|
|
Developed |
|
|
Developed |
|
|
Raw (2) |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Value |
|
Residential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Osceola County, Florida |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-1980 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,200 |
|
|
|
2,400 |
|
|
$ |
5,199 |
|
1999-2001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
|
45,198 |
|
2003 |
|
|
2002-2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
7,880 |
|
2004 |
|
|
2002-2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,400 |
|
|
|
1,400 |
|
|
|
19,307 |
|
2006 |
|
|
2002-2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,600 |
|
|
|
1,600 |
|
|
|
19,256 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Osceola County |
|
|
700 |
|
|
|
700 |
|
|
|
6,200 |
|
|
|
7,600 |
|
|
|
96,840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Polk County, Florida |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-1980 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
900 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
2,400 |
|
|
|
4,300 |
|
|
|
20,002 |
|
2003 |
|
|
2002-2003 |
|
|
|
900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
32,670 |
|
2004 |
|
|
2002-2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
|
19,966 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Polk County |
|
|
1,800 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
7,800 |
|
|
|
72,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
St. Lucie County, Florida |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
364 |
|
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
1,031 |
|
|
|
2,020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hernando County, Florida |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004-2005 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collier County, Florida |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-1980 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Highlands County, Florida |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-1980 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Santa Cruz County,(Rio Rico), Arizona |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-1980 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
600 |
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
3,700 |
|
|
|
4,600 |
|
|
|
10,630 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pima County, Arizona |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
3,725 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Residential |
|
|
|
|
3,543 |
|
|
$ |
2,369 |
|
|
|
15,340 |
|
|
|
21,252 |
|
|
$ |
186,176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated LLCs (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Polk County, Florida |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
$ |
1,774 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Martin County, Florida |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1981-1987 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
1,666 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Consolidated LLCs |
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
775 |
|
|
$ |
3,440 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
Item 1. Business continued
Real Estate Assets continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition |
|
Contract |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Book |
|
Date |
|
Date |
|
|
Acres |
|
|
Value |
|
Commercial/Industrial/Institutional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Florida |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-1980 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,300 |
|
|
$ |
7,105 |
|
2004 (3) |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
14,765 |
|
2005 (3) |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
15,620 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Florida |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
37,490 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arizona |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-1980 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Commercial/Industrial/Institutional |
|
|
2,200 |
|
|
$ |
37,757 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preserves, wetlands, open space |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-1980 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,176 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,847 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8,023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Estimated planned lots/units are based on historical densities for our land. New
projects may ultimately be developed into more or less than the number of lots/units stated. |
|
(2) |
|
We anticipate that with respect to our inventory of undeveloped land, new lots
developed over the next several years are likely to be developed at greater density per acre
than the density per acre we have undertaken over the past several years. We anticipate
evolving market demand for smaller and/or more affordable homes. Accordingly, the number of
lots we ultimately develop per acre from our inventory of raw land may exceed the units set
forth in this schedule. |
|
(3) |
|
During the 4th quarter 2008, our plans for this property changed from developing
it as single family housing to permitting as commercial/industrial/institutional land. |
|
(4) |
|
These landholdings were sold during 2009 to two newly formed LLCs in which we own a
minority interest. These LLCs are consolidated for accounting purposes. As a result, the
transactions did not qualify as sales for financial reporting purposes. |
Title Insurance Agency
Prominent Title Insurance Agency, Inc., a subsidiary of Avatar Properties Inc., maintains
operations in Poinciana, Florida. Services are offered to purchasers of homes from Avatar as well
as unrelated parties. Due to the substantial reduction in real estate transactions, our title
insurance agency operations in 2009 experienced a substantial decline in revenues.
9
Item 1. Business continued
Business Segment Information
Our business segment information regarding revenues, results of operations and assets is
incorporated herein by reference to Note P to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in
Item 8 of Part II of this Report.
Employees
As of December 31, 2009, we employed approximately 233 individuals (almost half of whom
are support staff for amenity operations and maintenance) on a full-time or part-time basis
compared to 585 individuals as of December 31, 2005. Relations with our employees are satisfactory
and there have been no work stoppages.
Investor Information
We are subject to the informational requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the Exchange Act). Accordingly, we file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements
and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC). You may read and
copy materials that we have filed with the SEC at the Public Reference Room of the SEC at 100 F
Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549 or by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. In addition, the SEC
maintains an Internet site (http://www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information
statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically.
You can access financial and other information on our website, at
www.avatarholdings.com. The information on or accessible through our website is not
incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K. We make available, free of charge, copies of our
annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and
amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange
Act as soon as reasonably practicable after filing such material electronically or otherwise with
the SEC. You may download this information from our website or may request us to mail specific
information to you. Information regarding equity transactions by our directors, officers and 10%
holders may also be obtained on our website.
Regulation
Our business is subject to extensive federal, state and local statutes, ordinances and
regulations that affect every aspect of our business such as environmental, hazardous waste and
land use requirements and can result in substantial expense to the company.
Competition
Our residential homebuilding, planned community development and other real estate
operations are subject to significant competition from distressed sellers. We currently compete
with foreclosure sales as well as resales by investors, speculators, foreclosing lenders and
residents in our communities. For the sales of new housing units, we compete, as to price and
product, with several national and regional homebuilding companies.
10
Item 1A. Risk Factors
In addition to risks and uncertainties in the ordinary course of business that are common to
all businesses, important factors that are specific to our industry and our company could
materially impact our future performance and results. We have provided below a list of these risk
factors. These are not all of the risks that we face, and other factors, including those currently
considered immaterial or unknown to us, may impact our future operations.
The economic downturn we have been experiencing may continue for an extended period, has created
greater uncertainty in our ability to forecast our business needs, and has adversely affected our
business and results of operations compared to prior periods
Since 2008, the market for homes in the geographic areas in which our developments are located
have been severely and negatively impacted. Unemployment has increased significantly and consumer
confidence has continued to erode. In the geographic areas in which we conduct our real estate
operations, there has been a significant increase in the number of homes for sale or available for
purchase or rent through foreclosures or otherwise. The price points at which these homes are
available have put downward pressure on our margins.
Since the fourth quarter of 2008, most of our sales contracts have been signed at selling
prices that have resulted or will result in financial losses upon closing when factoring in
operating costs such as sales and marketing and divisional overhead. During 2009 and 2008, we
recorded impairment charges of $1,820 and $5,168, respectively, for housing communities relating to
homes completed or under construction.
Our industry is highly cyclical and is affected by general economic conditions and other factors
beyond our control
The real estate industry is highly cyclical and is affected by changes in national, global and
local economic conditions and events, such as employment and income levels, availability of
financing, interest rates, consumer confidence and demand. We are subject to various risks, many of
which are outside our control, including real estate market conditions (both where our communities
and homebuilding operations are located and in areas where potential customers reside), changing
demographic conditions, adverse weather conditions and natural disasters, such as hurricanes,
tornadoes and wildfires, delays in construction schedules, cost overruns, changes in government
regulations or requirements, and increases in real estate taxes and other local government fees. We
are in the midst of a severe downturn in the real estate market. The market for new single-family
and multi-family residences has been weak for some time and continues to be weak.
The current economic environment has increased our deficit funding obligations for club and
homeowner association obligations
Because we fund homeowners association operating deficits and we operate our club amenities,
defaults in payments of club dues and homeowner association assessments by home owners have caused
us to expend additional available cash to maintain the homeowner association and club operations at
their current levels. Further, due to lower than anticipated sales of homes in certain of our
master planned communities, our obligations to fund our club and homeowner association operating
deficits are greater than projected as there are fewer new home sales in these communities to
absorb these obligations.
11
|
|
|
Item 1A. |
|
Risk Factors (dollars in thousands except share and per share data) continued |
A further decline in real estate values could result in additional impairment write-downs
A further decline in the real estate market could result in future impairments (as defined by
FASB authoritative accounting guidance) to certain of our land and other inventories and of our
investments in unconsolidated entities. The value of our land and other inventory and land owned by
unconsolidated entities depends on market conditions, including estimates of future demand for, and
the revenues that can be generated from, such inventory. The downturn in the real estate market has
caused the fair value of certain of our inventory to fall below its carrying value. Because of our
assessments of fair value, we have written down the carrying value of certain of our inventory, and
take corresponding non-cash charges against our earnings to reflect the impaired value. If the
current downturn in the real estate market continues, we may need to take additional charges
against our earnings for inventory impairments and/or a write-down of our investments in
unconsolidated entities and our other assets. Any such non-cash charges could have an adverse
effect on our consolidated results of operations.
We are concentrated geographically, which could adversely affect our business
Our land and development activities are located in Florida and Arizona, which are among the
states most adversely affected by the downturn in the residential real estate market. Development
activities depend to a significant degree on the levels of immigration to Florida from outside the
United States, migration to Florida from within the United States and purchases in Florida of
second and/or vacation homes. Our understanding is that recently there has been substantially less
migration into Florida from within the United States than there had been in previous years.
Our access to financing may be limited
While we have curtailed our homebuilding operations, our business is still capital intensive
and requires expenditures for land and infrastructure development, housing construction, and
working capital, as well as potential development opportunities. As of December 31, 2009, total
consolidated indebtedness was $119,002, including $63,010 carrying amount of our 4.50% Convertible
Senior Notes due 2024 (the 4.50% Notes) and borrowings of $55,881 outstanding under our amended
unsecured credit facility, which matures on September 20, 2010, as well as letters of credit
totaling $22,535 of which $21,053 were financial/maintenance letters of credit. On November 7,
2008, Franklin Bank SSB (Franklin Bank), one of the participating financial institutions in our
amended unsecured credit facility, was closed by the Texas Department of Savings and Mortgage
Lending and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) was named receiver. On January 13,
2010, we received notification from the FDIC that Franklin Bank is no longer a participant in our
amended credit facility. Franklin Bank was a 20% participant.
On July 23, 2009, Guaranty Bank, one of the participating financial institutions in our
amended unsecured credit facility, announced that it no longer believed it could raise sufficient
capital, therefore, it was not probable that it would be able to continue as a going concern.
Guaranty Bank is a 25% or $25,000 participant in our amended unsecured credit facility. On August
21, 2009, BBVA Compass acquired the banking operations of Guaranty Bank from the FDIC. BBVA Compass
acquired the assets and assumed the deposits and entered into a loss sharing arrangement with the
FDIC that covers all of the acquired loans. BBVA Compass/Guaranty Bank continues to participate in
our Amended Unsecured Credit Facility. The outstanding borrowings under our amended unsecured
credit facility include participation from BBVA Compass/Guaranty Bank in the amount of
approximately $17,877.
We are in preliminary discussions with the administrative agent for our unsecured credit
facility regarding an extension. Should we reach an agreement on an extension it is expected to
result in a reduction in the line of credit to approximately $50,000 and higher costs for
outstanding borrowings and letters of credit. Further, we anticipate that the facility will be
converted to a secured facility and provide for a paydown of outstanding borrowings while we have
cash exceeding a specified level. These discussions are in preliminary stages, and there can be no
assurance that we will reach an agreement.
12
|
|
|
Item 1A. |
|
Risk Factors (dollars in thousands except share and per share data) continued |
We anticipate, but cannot assure, that the amounts available from internally generated funds,
cash on hand, the sale of non-core assets, and existing and future financing will be sufficient to
fund our anticipated operating deficit and our operations, meet debt service and working capital
requirements, and provide sufficient liquidity. We may seek additional capital in the form of
equity or debt financing from a variety of potential sources, including additional bank financing
and sales of debt or equity securities. However, we cannot assure that such financing will be
available or, if available, will be on favorable terms. In addition, from time to time we have
obtained the necessary or desirable amendments to our amended unsecured credit facility. There can
be no assurance that we will be able to obtain future amendments at favorable terms and costs.
Higher interest rates could have a further adverse effect on our business
A significant majority of the purchasers of our homes finance their purchases through
third-party lenders providing mortgage financing or, to some extent, rely upon investment income.
In general, housing demand is dependent on home equity, consumer savings and third-party financing
and has been adversely affected by less favorable mortgage terms, including requirements for higher
deposits and higher credit scores, the tightening of underwriting standards, and declining
employment. Certain lenders are imposing more stringent credit requirements.
Our success significantly depends on our key personnel and our ability to retain personnel
Our business strategy requires, among other things, the retention of experienced management
personnel and employees. The loss of the services of certain members of the senior and middle
management teams could have a material adverse effect on the success of our business strategy.
Our joint ventures and equity partnerships may not achieve anticipated results
We may seek additional joint venture or equity partnership arrangements. A joint venture or
equity partnership may involve special risks associated with the possibility that a partner or
partnership at any time (i) may have economic or business interests or goals that are inconsistent
with ours, (ii) may take actions contrary to our instructions or requests or contrary to our
policies or objectives with respect to our real estate investments or (iii) could experience
financial difficulties. Actions by a partner may have the result of subjecting property owned by
the joint venture or equity partnership to liabilities in excess of those contemplated by the terms
of the joint venture or equity partnership agreement or have other adverse consequences. We cannot
assure that any joint venture or equity partnership arrangements will achieve the results
anticipated or otherwise prove successful.
Our business is subject to substantial competition
The residential homebuilding industry is competitive and other national, regional and local
homebuilders compete with us in markets where we are selling homes. Further, our residential
homebuilding, planned community development and other real estate operations are subject to
significant competition from distressed sellers. We currently compete with foreclosure sales as
well as resales by investors, speculators, foreclosing lenders and residents in our communities.
For sales of new housing units, we compete, as to price and product, with several national and
regional homebuilding companies.
13
|
|
|
Item 1A. |
|
Risk Factors (dollars in thousands except share and per share data) continued |
We continue to focus on acquiring real estate or real estate related assets as the fallout
from the deleveraging of the economy continues to adversely affect real estate values. We have
analyzed a substantial number of residential real estate properties in Florida and Arizona and debt
secured by real estate. During September 2009, we acquired completed and partially completed homes,
developed and partially developed lots and undeveloped lots in St. Lucie County, Florida for
approximately $7,450. During December 2009, we acquired 86 developed lots in Pima County, Arizona
for approximately $3,725. We compete for opportunities to acquire real estate or real estate
related assets with investors, other residential land developers and home builders, and real estate
funds, and there can be no assurance that we will identify and be able to acquire appropriate
assets or that any such assets we were to acquire would result in a desirable return on our
investment.
We are subject to extensive governmental regulation and environmental considerations
Our business is subject to extensive federal, state and local statutes, ordinances and
regulations. The broad discretion that governmental agencies have in administering those
requirements and no growth or slow growth policies, can prevent, delay, make uneconomic or
significantly increase the costs of development. Various governmental approvals and permits are
required throughout the development process, and no assurance can be given as to the receipt (or
timing of receipt) of these approvals or permits. Furthermore, governmental approvals may be
affected by changes in the policies of government entities or modifications to policies to address
current economic conditions. The incurrence of substantial compliance costs and the imposition of
delays and other regulatory burdens could have a material adverse effect on our operations. In
addition, various federal, state and local laws subject property owners or operators to liability
for the costs of removal or remediation of certain hazardous substances located or released on a
property. Such laws often impose liability without regard to whether the owner knew of, or was
responsible for, the hazardous substances. The presence of such hazardous substances at one or more
properties, and the requirement to remove or remediate such substances, may result in significant
cost.
Further, some laws require us to provide roads and other off-site improvements concurrent with
new construction. In some cases, counties and municipalities will also charge us impact or other
similar fees and assessments to pay for concurrent infrastructure to serve new development.
Development projects may also be subject to assessments for schools, parks, highways and other
public improvements, the costs of which can be substantial. These laws are subject to frequent
change and frequently result in higher construction costs.
Both Florida and Arizona have laws respecting statutory disclosures and requirements that must
be complied with in the marketing and selling of new homes. Other states require us to register our
Florida and Arizona projects with such states before we can locally market our homes to residents
of such states. There are also Federal laws and regulations that we must comply with in order to
allow our home buyers to obtain federally insured mortgages. If certain Federal and state laws are
not complied with, home buyers may have a right to cancel their contracts and to a return of their
deposit.
Certain events could trigger the acceleration of payment of our 4.50% Notes
Certain events could result in a default under our 4.50% Notes. These include cessation of
trading of our common stock, failure to pay interest when due on our 4.50% Notes, and final
judgment(s) for the payment of money in excess of $20,000 rendered against us or any of our
subsidiaries if not discharged for any periods of 30 consecutive days during which a stay of
enforcement is not in effect. Such default would result in the requirement for payment of the 4.50%
Notes prior to the due date thereof. In addition, holders may require us to repurchase the 4.50%
Notes for cash on April 1, 2011, April 1, 2014 and April 1, 2019. Our inability to make such
accelerated payment could have a material adverse effect upon our business.
14
|
|
|
Item 1A. |
|
Risk Factors (dollars in thousands except share and per share data) continued |
Failure to purchase replacement property or obtain an extension of time in which to do so could
result in a reduction in available cash
In 2006, we closed on substantially all of the land sold under the threat of condemnation, and
in 2007 we closed on the remainder. We believe these transactions entitled us to defer the payment
of income taxes of $24,355 from the gain on these sales. During October 2009, we received from the
Internal Revenue Service a final extension until December 31, 2010 to obtain replacement property
to defer the payment of income taxes. It is our intention to acquire replacement property by
December 31, 2010. It is possible that we may not identify and purchase adequate replacement
property within the required time period, which could require us to make this income tax payment
plus interest of approximately $7,000 as of December 31, 2010. This would result in a reduction in
available cash.
We are subject to construction defect and home warranty claims arising in the ordinary course of
business, which may lead to additional reserves or expenses
Despite our commitment to quality, from time to time we discover construction defects in our
homes either as a result of our own inspections or in response to customer service requests. To
address possible defects that may occur during construction, we set aside a warranty reserve in
connection with every home closing. We also maintain general liability insurance and require our
subcontractors and professional service providers to maintain insurance coverage and indemnify us
for liabilities in connection with their services. Historically, our home warranty reserves have
been sufficient to cover all claims for construction defects. Nonetheless, it is possible that our
warranty reserves, insurance and/or indemnities will not be adequate to cover all construction
defects and home warranty claims for which we may be held liable in the future.
On August 11, 2009, we determined that one of our homes, constructed on a scattered lot in
Poinciana, contains reactive drywall manufactured in China (Chinese drywall). The Chinese drywall
in this home was provided to our drywall contractor by a secondary supplier of such drywall
contractor. We reached a settlement with the secondary supplier who reimbursed Avatar for a
substantial portion of the cost to repair the home and extends the same financial reimbursement to
other homes containing reactive drywall from such secondary supplier. The repairs to the home are
complete or about to be completed. Although we received no more customer service calls regarding
reactive drywall from customers in Poinciana, we recently surveyed other owners whose homes
contained drywall provided by the secondary supplier in the approximate time period such supplier
had reactive drywall in its warehouse. As a result of this process, which is ongoing, we have
determined that at least two more Poinciana homes contain reactive drywall. We have notified the
secondary supplier of our determination and we believe the costs to repair those homes will be
substantially reimbursed by such supplier. If and to the extent the scope of the Chinese drywall
issues in Poinciana prove to be significantly greater than we currently believe, and our existing
warranty reserves together with our insurance and any recovery from the secondary supplier as to
Poinciana is not sufficient to cover claims, losses or other issues related to the reactive
drywall, we could incur costs or liabilities related to this issue that could have a material
adverse effect on our results of operations, financial position and cash flows.
If we do not secure funding for our Poinciana Parkway project on commercially acceptable terms and
commence construction by February 14, 2011, we will be in default under our agreements with Polk
and Osceola Counties regarding the Poinciana Parkway, and we may not recover our investment in the
Poinciana Parkway, which has already been substantially impaired
In July 2008 and August 2008, we entered into amended and restated agreements with Osceola
County and Polk County (the Counties), pursuant to which construction of the Poinciana Parkway is
to be commenced by February 14, 2011. Construction was to be completed by December 31, 2011 subject
to extension for specified Force Majeure events. We have notified the Counties that the completion
date has been extended to October 14, 2013 due to Force Majeure events related to the economic
downturn. We advised the Counties that the current economic downturn has resulted in our inability
to: (i) conclude negotiations with potential investors; or (ii) obtain financing for the
construction of the Poinciana Parkway.
15
|
|
|
Item 1A. |
|
Risk Factors (dollars in thousands except share and per share data) continued |
If funding for the Poinciana Parkway is not obtained so that construction of the Poinciana
Parkway can be commenced by February 14, 2011 as required by our agreements with Osceola County and
Polk County, the Counties have no right to obtain damages or sue Avatar for specific performance. Polk Countys sole remedy
under its agreement with us is to cancel such agreement if we do not construct the Poinciana
Parkway. If the construction of the Poinciana Parkway is not funded and commenced by February 14,
2011, (i) a portion of our land in Osceola County will become subject to Osceola traffic
concurrency requirements applicable generally to other home builders in the County and (ii) we will
be required to contribute approximately $1,900 towards the construction cost of certain traffic
improvements in Osceola County that we otherwise might have been obligated to build or fund if we
had not agreed to construct the Poinciana Parkway. Avatar is investigating the availability of an
extension of the Poinciana Parkway permits and the related deadlines in its agreements with the
Counties.
Our estimate of the right-of-way acquisition, development and construction costs for the
Poinciana Parkway approximates $175,000 to $200,000. However, no assurance of the ultimate costs
can be given at this stage. As of December 31, 2009, approximately $47,000 has been expended.
During 2009 and 2008 we recorded impairment charges of $8,108 and $30,228, respectively, associated
with the Poinciana Parkway. At December 31, 2009, the carrying value of the Poinciana Parkway is
$8,482. If we cannot obtain funding for construction of the Poinciana Parkway and commence
construction by February 14, 2011, or obtain amendments of our agreements with the Counties
regarding the Poinciana Parkway and permit extensions, it is unlikely that we will recover our
investment in the Poinciana Parkway at any time in the foreseeable future.
We have never paid dividends on our common stock, and we do not anticipate paying any cash
dividends in the foreseeable future
We have never paid cash dividends on our common stock to date, and we intend to retain our
future earnings, if any, to fund the development and growth of our business. In addition, the terms
of existing or any future debt may preclude us from paying these dividends. As a result, capital
appreciation, if any, of our common stock is likely to be your sole source of gain for the
foreseeable future.
|
|
|
Item 1B. |
|
Unresolved Staff Comments |
None.
16
Avatars real estate operations are summarized in Item 1. Business above and described in
Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Land developed and in the process of being developed, or held for investment and/or future
development, is set forth in Note C of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8.
Our corporate headquarters are located at 201 Alhambra Circle, Coral Gables, Florida, in
16,810 square feet of leased office space. For additional information concerning properties leased
by Avatar, see Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Contractual Obligations and Item 8. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
|
|
Item 3. |
|
Legal Proceedings |
The information set forth in Note N (Commitments and Contingencies) of the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this Report is incorporated
herein by reference.
We are involved in various pending litigation matters primarily arising in the normal course
of our business. These cases are in various procedural stages. Although the outcome of these
matters cannot be determined, Avatar believes it is probable in accordance with authoritative
accounting standards, that certain claims may result in costs and expenses estimated at
approximately $334 and $1,600 which have been accrued in the accompanying consolidated balance
sheets as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Liabilities or costs arising out of these
and other currently pending litigation should not have a material adverse effect on our business or
consolidated financial position or results of operations.
We have no tax-related penalties required to be disclosed in this Item 3 pursuant to Section
6707A(e) of the Internal Revenue Code.
|
|
|
Item 4. |
|
(Removed and Reserved) |
17
Executive Officers of the Registrant
Pursuant to General Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K, the following list is included as an
unnumbered item in Part I of this report in lieu of being included in the Proxy Statement for the
Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on June 3, 2010.
The following is a list of names and ages of all of the executive officers of Avatar,
indicating principal positions and offices with Avatar or a subsidiary held by each such person and
each such persons principal occupation(s) or employment during the past five years unless
otherwise indicated. Officers of Avatar have been elected to serve until the next annual election
of officers (which is expected to occur on June 3, 2010), when they are re-appointed or their
successors are elected or until their earlier resignation or removal.
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Age |
|
Office and Business Experience |
Gerald D. Kelfer |
|
64 |
|
President since February 1997, Chief Executive Officer since July 1997, Chairman of the Executive Committee since May 1999, Vice Chairman of the Board since December 1996, and a member of the Board of Directors since October 1996; and holds various positions with subsidiaries. |
|
|
|
|
|
Michael Levy |
|
51 |
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, Avatar Properties Inc., since December 1997; and holds various positions with other subsidiaries. |
|
|
|
|
|
Patricia Kimball Fletcher |
|
52 |
|
Executive Vice President and General Counsel since January 2007; formerly Partner and Chair of Florida Real Estate and Finance Department, Duane Morris LLP, from January 2002 to December 2006; and holds various positions with subsidiaries. |
|
|
|
|
|
Randy L. Kotler |
|
44 |
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since July 2007 and Treasurer since August 2007; formerly Chief Accounting Officer of TOUSA, Inc., from May 2002 to June 2007; Senior Vice President from May 2006 to June 2007; Interim Chief Financial Officer, from May 2006 to January 2007; and Vice President from May 2002 to May 2006; and holds various positions with subsidiaries. |
|
|
|
|
|
Juanita I. Kerrigan |
|
63 |
|
Vice President and Secretary since September 1980; and holds various positions with subsidiaries. |
The above executive officers have held their present positions with Avatar for more than five
years, except as otherwise noted. No executive officer of Avatar has any family relationship with
any other executive officer or director of Avatar.
18
PART II
|
|
|
Item 5. |
|
Market for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities |
The Common Stock of Avatar Holdings Inc. is traded through The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC under
the symbol AVTR. There were 4,257 record holders of Common Stock at February 28, 2010.
High and low quotations, as reported, for the last two years were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quotations |
|
Quarter Ended |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
High |
|
|
Low |
|
|
High |
|
|
Low |
|
March 31 |
|
$ |
28.55 |
|
|
$ |
14.49 |
|
|
$ |
53.32 |
|
|
$ |
34.95 |
|
June 30 |
|
$ |
20.17 |
|
|
$ |
15.03 |
|
|
$ |
47.18 |
|
|
$ |
30.29 |
|
September 30 |
|
$ |
21.45 |
|
|
$ |
17.28 |
|
|
$ |
39.14 |
|
|
$ |
26.54 |
|
December 31 |
|
$ |
18.90 |
|
|
$ |
15.09 |
|
|
$ |
33.95 |
|
|
$ |
23.39 |
|
Avatar has not declared any cash dividends on Common Stock since its issuance and has no
present intention to pay cash dividends.
For the three months ended December 31, 2009, Avatar repurchased shares as reflected in the
following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased as |
|
|
Maximum Amount That |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part of a Publicly |
|
|
May Yet Be |
|
|
|
Total Number |
|
|
Average Price Paid |
|
|
Announced Plan or |
|
|
Purchased Under the |
|
Period |
|
of Shares Purchased |
|
|
Per Share |
|
|
Program (1) |
|
|
Plan or Program (1) |
|
October 1, 2009 to October 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
18,304 |
|
November 1, 2009 to November 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
18,304 |
|
December 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
18,304 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1) |
|
On October 13, 2008, our Board of Directors amended its June 2005 authorization to
purchase the 4.50% Notes and/or common stock to allow expenditures up to $30,000, including
the $9,864 previously authorized. On October 17, 2008, we repurchased $35,920 principal
amount of the 4.50% Notes for approximately $28,112 including accrued interest. On December
12, 2008, our Board of Directors amended its June 2005 authorization to purchase the 4.50%
Notes and/or common stock to allow expenditures up to $30,000, including the $1,888
remaining after the October 2008 activities. On March 30, 2009, we repurchased $7,500
principal amount of the 4.50% Notes for approximately $6,038 including accrued interest. On
June 19, 2009, we repurchased $6,576 principal amount of the 4.50% Notes for approximately
$5,658 including accrued interest. As of December 31, 2009, the remaining authorization is
$18,304. |
19
|
|
|
Item 6 |
|
. Selected Financial Data |
FIVE YEAR COMPARISON OF SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
Dollars in thousands (except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At or for the Years ended December 31 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Statement of Operations Data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
73,501 |
|
|
$ |
110,366 |
|
|
$ |
291,832 |
|
|
$ |
835,079 |
|
|
$ |
516,848 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before
income taxes and discontinued operations |
|
($ |
61,843 |
) |
|
($ |
142,341 |
) |
|
$ |
34,053 |
|
|
$ |
256,479 |
|
|
$ |
85,490 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax (expense) benefit |
|
|
32,860 |
|
|
|
32,465 |
|
|
|
(13,056 |
) |
|
|
(83,151 |
) |
|
|
(29,336 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
(28,983 |
) |
|
|
(109,876 |
) |
|
|
20,997 |
|
|
|
173,328 |
|
|
|
56,154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations
(including gain on disposal of $8,322 for 2005) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,562 |
|
Income tax (expense) benefit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,634 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,928 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
($ |
28,983 |
) |
|
($ |
109,876 |
) |
|
$ |
20,997 |
|
|
$ |
173,328 |
|
|
$ |
62,082 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Share Data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
($ |
3.11 |
) |
|
($ |
12.85 |
) |
|
$ |
2.53 |
|
|
$ |
21.16 |
|
|
$ |
6.97 |
|
Income from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
($ |
3.11 |
) |
|
($ |
12.85 |
) |
|
$ |
2.53 |
|
|
$ |
21.16 |
|
|
$ |
7.70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share Data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
($ |
3.11 |
) |
|
($ |
12.85 |
) |
|
$ |
2.22 |
|
|
$ |
16.59 |
|
|
$ |
5.72 |
|
Income from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
($ |
3.11 |
) |
|
($ |
12.85 |
) |
|
$ |
2.22 |
|
|
$ |
16.59 |
|
|
$ |
6.28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
217,132 |
|
|
$ |
175,396 |
|
|
$ |
192,258 |
|
|
$ |
203,760 |
|
|
$ |
38,479 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
594,719 |
|
|
$ |
594,812 |
|
|
$ |
710,144 |
|
|
$ |
752,996 |
|
|
$ |
624,222 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes, mortgage notes and other debt |
|
$ |
119,002 |
|
|
$ |
131,061 |
|
|
$ |
122,505 |
|
|
$ |
125,632 |
|
|
$ |
130,157 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity (1) |
|
$ |
445,119 |
|
|
$ |
429,511 |
|
|
$ |
535,021 |
|
|
$ |
513,543 |
|
|
$ |
322,477 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares outstanding |
|
|
11,355,451 |
|
|
|
8,829,798 |
|
|
|
8,525,412 |
|
|
|
8,193,736 |
|
|
|
8,179,463 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity per share |
|
$ |
39.20 |
|
|
$ |
48.64 |
|
|
$ |
62.76 |
|
|
$ |
62.68 |
|
|
$ |
39.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
For 2009, this includes $1,018 for cumulative non-controlling interests, which
are classified in consolidated stockholders equity in accordance with authoritative accounting
guidance. These non-controlling interests represent our partners equity in LLCs which we
consolidate for financial reporting purposes. |
20
|
|
|
Item 7 |
|
. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations (dollars in thousands except per share data) |
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations
should be read in conjunction with Selected Financial Data and our audited consolidated financial
statements and accompanying notes included elsewhere in this document.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain statements discussed under the captions Business, Risk Factors, Legal
Proceedings, Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations and elsewhere in this Form 10-K constitute forward-looking statements within the
meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements
involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors that could cause the
actual results, performance or achievements of results to differ materially from any future
results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such
risks, uncertainties and other important factors include, among others, those contained under the
caption Risk Factors in Item 1A.
OVERVIEW
We are engaged in the business of real estate operations in Florida and Arizona. Our
residential community development activities have been adversely affected in both markets, bringing
development in our active adult and primary residential communities to a low level. We also engage
in other real estate activities, such as the operation of amenities, the sale for third-party
development of commercial and industrial land and the operation of a title insurance agency, which
activities have also been adversely affected by economic conditions.
Our assets consist primarily of real estate in the states of Florida and Arizona. As of
December 31, 2009, we own more than 16,000 acres and have a minority ownership interest in an
additional 830 acres of developed, partially developed or developable residential, commercial and
industrial property. Avatar is required to consolidate these LLCs in accordance with
authoritative accounting guidance. Some portion of these acres may be developed as roads,
retention ponds, parks, school sites, community amenities or for other similar uses.
Within Florida and Arizona we also own more than 15,000 acres of preserves, wetlands, open
space and other areas that at this time are not developable, permitable and/or economically
feasible to develop, but may at some future date have an economic value for preservation or
conservation purposes.
We remain focused on maintaining sufficient liquidity. It is our intention to continue to
monetize our inventory of unsold homes and many of our model homes in anticipation of introducing
new homes and models. We expect that these new products will include smaller and less amenitized
houses to enable us to sell homes at lower price points when the market recovers. In the areas in
which our developments are located, we believe that for the foreseeable future there may be more
demand for smaller and less amenitized homes than in prior years.
We continue to defer the introduction of new housing products or recommencing development
activities in most of our existing communities until such times as we believe that our markets
would enable us to construct and sell new houses at an acceptable profit.
We continue to focus on acquiring real estate or real estate related assets as the fallout
from the deleveraging of the economy continues to adversely affect real estate values. We have
evaluated a substantial number of residential real estate properties in Florida and Arizona which
we believe could represent opportunities to acquire real estate, or debt secured by real estate, at
a substantial discount to its intrinsic value. On September 24, 2009, we acquired 87 completed and partially completed homes, 267
developed lots, 364 partially developed lots and approximately 400 undeveloped master planned lots
in a residential community known as Seasons at Tradition in St. Lucie County, Florida. The purchase
price was approximately $7,450. We are completing construction of certain inventory homes and
infrastructure and are actively marketing the sale of all of the inventory homes in Seasons. In
addition, on December 3, 2009 we acquired 86 developed lots located at Estancias del Corazon in Pima
County, Arizona. The purchase price was approximately $3,725.
21
|
|
|
Item 7. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(dollars in thousands except per share data) continued |
We have an experienced residential real estate development group which is able to
expeditiously underwrite portfolios of residential real estate ranging from large
undeveloped/unentitled parcels of land to finished lots, and acquire these properties or the debt
secured by these properties from financial institutions or others. We believe our cash position and
our ability to plan, permit, develop and sell land, as well as to design, permit and build out
highly amenitized residential communities enable us to have a competitive advantage in buying such
properties over financial buyers and developers not having extensive experience in Florida or
Arizona. However, we compete for opportunities to acquire real estate or real estate related assets
and there can be no assurance that we will identify and be able to acquire such assets or that any
such assets we were to acquire would result in a desirable return on our investment.
On December 11, 2009, Frenchmans Yacht Club Developers, LLC (Frenchmans), a Florida
limited liability company in which our wholly-owned subsidiary, Avatar Properties Inc.
(Properties), is the sole member, sold its interest in the proposed development known as
Frenchmans Yacht Club to an unrelated third party for cash and a purchase money note of $4,208.
The amount of cash we received did not meet the criteria in authoritative accounting guidance to
record this sale under the full accrual method of profit recognition. As a result, this transaction
is accounted for under the cost recovery method. Under the cost recovery method, no profit is
recognized until cash payments by the buyer, including principal and interest on the purchase money
note due to us exceeds the cost of the property sold. In the Frenchmans transaction, since we sold
the property at a loss, in accordance with authoritative accounting guidance we recognized the loss
of approximately $3,800 in full. The note receivable was discounted by $1,291 to the fair value for
purposes of measuring the loss on this transaction. Additionally, future interest cash receipts
will be recorded as deferred income, and presented as a reduction to the note receivable until such
time that the cumulative cash payments by the buyer exceed Avatars book value in the property at
the time of sale.
On December 21, 2009, Properties entered into three separate agreements with unrelated third
parties providing for the formation of three separate limited liability companies (LLCs). Banyan
Bay Development Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Properties, sold partially developed lots
and unplatted land to one of the LLCs for cash and a purchase money note. Properties also entered
into a land option contract with the LLC for certain of the Banyan Bay land. Properties sold its
partially developed but unplatted lots in Cory Lake Isles to another of the LLCs for cash.
Properties sold its Terralargo club facilities, developed and undeveloped platted lots and
undeveloped land to the third LLC for cash and a purchase money note. Properties also entered into
a land option contract with the LLC for certain of the Terralargo land. Properties acquired a
minority equity interest in each of the LLCs and participates in the management of each of the
LLCs. The land option contracts provide us the right, but not the obligation, to acquire a
specified number of developed lots at agreed upon prices.
In accordance with authoritative accounting guidance, we determined that these LLCs qualify as
variable interest entities (VIEs) which requires consolidation by the entity determined to be
the primary beneficiary. The primary beneficiary is the party determined to absorb the majority of
the VIEs expected losses, receives a majority of the VIEs expected residual returns, or both. As
a result of our analyses, we determined Avatar holds a variable interest in the VIEs through the
purchase money notes, the land option contracts and an economic interest in these LLCs. Based on
our analysis, we determined that we are the primary beneficiary of these entities. As a result, for
financial reporting purposes, these transactions were not sales and therefore the assets remain in
our financial statements. Avatar recorded an impairment charge of approximately $11,919 for the
year ended December 31, 2009 related to the inventory of these properties.
During 2009, we filed a shelf registration statement on Form S-3 for $500,000 of debt and
equity securities, which was supplemented in September 2009 by a supplemental prospectus for a
public offering of shares of our Common Stock, underwritten by Barclays Capital Inc. (the
Underwriter). We agreed to sell to the Underwriter 2,250,000 shares of our Common Stock, which
were offered to the public at a price of $18.00 per share and discounted to the Underwriter to a
price of $17.10 per share. The Underwriter was granted an over-allotment option to purchase up to
an additional 337,500 shares of Common Stock, at the same offering price to the public and subject
to the same underwriting discount. The closing on the sale of the 2,250,000 shares of Common Stock
occurred on September 28, 2009. Net proceeds to us before expenses were $38,475. On October 6,
2009, we closed on the sale of an additional 264,391 shares of our Common Stock
22
|
|
|
Item 7. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(dollars in thousands except per share data) continued |
pursuant to the Underwriters partial exercise of its option to purchase additional shares, which
option expired on October 23, 2009. Net proceeds of the partial exercise of the option were $4,521,
resulting in total net proceeds of the offering, after approximately $700 of offering expenses, of
approximately $42,296. We intend to use the proceeds from the sale for general corporate purposes
including, without limitation, potential acquisitions of real estate and real estate-related
assets.
We evaluate our Land and Other Inventories for impairment on a quarterly basis. During 2009,
our assessment resulted in impairment charges of $21,847, which included $1,820 in impairment
charges for housing communities relating to homes completed or under construction, $11,919 relating to assets sold to newly formed consolidated LLCs and $8,108 relating to
the Poinciana Parkway.
Fiscal Year 2010 Outlook
During 2009, our homebuilding results reflect the difficult conditions in our Florida and
Arizona markets characterized by record levels of homes available for sale and diminished buyer
confidence. The number of foreclosure sales as well as investor-owned units for sale; the number of
foreclosures, pending foreclosures and mortgage defaults; the availability of significant
discounts; the difficulty of potential purchasers in selling their existing homes at prices they
are willing to accept; the significant amount of standing inventory and competition continue to
adversely affect both the number of homes we are able to sell and the prices at which we are able
to sell them. As a result, our communities continue to experience low traffic, significant
discounts, low margins, and continued high delinquencies on homeowner association and club
membership dues. In addition, our business is affected to some extent by the seasonality of home
sales which are generally higher during the months of November through April in the geographic
areas in which we conduct our business. Our profits on the sale of homes continue to decline as we
offer lower prices and higher discounts to meet competitive pricing and declining demand. During
2009, most of our sales contracts have been signed at selling prices that have resulted or will
result in losses upon closing when factoring in operating costs such as sales and marketing and
divisional overhead. During 2009, we recorded impairment charges of $1,820 for housing communities
relating to homes completed or under construction. We believe that housing market conditions will
continue to be difficult during 2010.
While the level and duration of the downturn cannot currently be predicted, we anticipate that
these conditions will continue to have an adverse effect on our operations during 2010. We
anticipate we will continue to generate operating losses during 2010. We believe that we have
sufficient available cash to fund these losses for 2010.
We have taken steps to decrease operating expenses including the consolidation of field
operations and a reduction of staff. Since December 31, 2005, we reduced our headcount by 60% to
233 full-time and part-time employees (almost half of whom are support staff for amenity operations
and maintenance) from 585 full-time and part-time employees.
We continue to manage Avatar and its assets for the long-term benefit of our shareholders. We
remain focused on maintaining sufficient liquidity. We continue to carefully manage our inventory
levels through curtailing land development, reducing home starts and reducing prices of completed
homes. Our strategy also includes the monetization of commercial and industrial land and other
assets, and the possible sale of certain residential land to bring forward future cash flows that
would otherwise constitute long-term developments.
Residential Real Estate
Revenues and sales data derived from primary and active adult homebuilding operations for the
years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 are summarized under Results of Operations.
23
|
|
|
Item 7. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(dollars in thousands except per share data) continued |
Residential Community Development
Active Adult Communities
Our active adult communities of Solivita and Solivita West are located in Poinciana, Florida,
approximately 21 miles south of Orlando and 20 miles from Walt Disney World. At Solivita and
Solivita West, we have developed approximately 126,000 square feet of recreation facilities. These
facilities include a fitness center, a golf clubhouse, restaurants, arts and crafts rooms, a café,
other meeting and ballroom facilities, and two 18-hole golf courses. The communitys active park
houses a variety of sporting and games facilities, including an official softball field, half-court
basketball court, pickleball courts and tennis courts.
Solivita opened during 2000. During 2004, we commenced the development of an expansion of
Solivita, Solivita West, on 907 acres of land in Poinciana acquired in 2003. Sales of single-family
units commenced during the first quarter of 2005 and closings commenced during 2006.
From inception, we have closed 3,389 homes in Solivita and Solivita West, and approximately
5,800 individuals resided in the communities as of December 31, 2009.
We have continued to defer the introduction of new housing products or recommencing
development activities in most of our existing communities until such times as we believe that our
markets would enable us to construct and sell new houses at an acceptable profit. However, we have
recommenced construction in Solivita and Solivita West on a limited basis and we are analyzing new
product models.
During 2009, we signed 56 contracts, net of cancellations, at Solivita and Solivita West, with
net sales value of approximately $11,934 (see Results of Operations).
On September 24, 2009, we acquired 87 completed and partially completed homes, 267 developed
lots, 364 partially developed lots and approximately 400 undeveloped master planned lots in an
active adult community named Seasons at Tradition located in St. Lucie County, Florida. We are
completing construction of substantially and partially completed homes in Seasons at an approximate
cost of $1,200 of which $400 will be spent replacing Chinese drywall that was placed in such homes
during the time they were owned by the original builder. We are actively marketing the sale of the
inventory homes in Seasons.
Primary Residential Development
Our primary residential developments are located at Poinciana and Bellalago in central Florida
near Orlando; and Rio Rico, south of Tucson, Arizona. We continue to defer the introduction of new
housing products or recommencing development activities in our primary communities, both on
scattered lots and on contiguous parcels as part of planned communities, in Florida and Rio Rico,
Arizona until such times as we believe that our markets would enable us to construct and sell new
houses at an acceptable profit. On December 3, 2009, we acquired 86 developed lots located at Estancias del Corazon in Pima
County, Arizona.
24
|
|
|
Item 7. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(dollars in thousands except per share data) continued |
Poinciana Parkway and Toll Road
In December 2006, we entered into agreements with Osceola County, Florida and Polk County,
Florida for us to develop and construct at our cost a 9.66 mile four-lane road in Osceola and Polk
Counties, to be known as the Poinciana Parkway (the Poinciana Parkway). The Poinciana Parkway is
to include a 4.15 mile segment to be operated as a toll road. We have acquired right-of-way and
federal and state environmental permits necessary to construct the Poinciana Parkway. In July 2008
and August 2008, we entered into amended and restated agreements with Osceola County and Polk
County, pursuant to which construction is to be commenced by February 14, 2011. Construction was to
be completed by December 31, 2011 subject to extension for Force Majeure. We have notified the
Counties that the completion date has been extended to October 14, 2013 due to Force Majeure
related to the economic downturn. We advised the Counties that the current economic downturn has
resulted in our inability to: (i) conclude negotiations with potential investors; or (ii)
obtain financing for the construction of the Poinciana Parkway.
If funding for the Poinciana Parkway is not obtained so that construction of the Poinciana
Parkway can be commenced by February 14, 2011 as required by our agreements with Osceola County and
Polk County, the Counties have no right to obtain damages or sue Avatar for specific performance.
Polk Countys sole remedy under its agreement with Avatar is to cancel such agreement if Avatar
does not construct the Poinciana Parkway. If the construction of the Parkway is not funded and
commenced by February 14, 2011, (i) a portion of Avatars land in Osceola County will become
subject to Osceola traffic concurrency requirements applicable generally to other home builders in
the County and (ii) Avatar will be required to contribute approximately $1,900 towards the
construction cost of certain traffic improvements in Osceola County that it otherwise might have
been obligated to build or fund if it had not agreed to construct the Poinciana Parkway. Avatar is
investigating the availability of an extension of the Poinciana Parkway permits and the related
deadlines in its agreements with the Counties.
Osceola County and Avatar were unsuccessful in their attempt to obtain a federal grant for
construction of the Parkway. Osceola County and Avatar are still attempting to obtain other
federal funds for development of the Poinciana Parkway, including tax appropriation and a federal
loan. We cannot predict whether any federal funds will be available.
For the Poinciana Parkway, indicators of impairment are general economic conditions, rate of
population growth and estimated change in traffic levels. If indicators are present, we perform an
impairment test in which the asset is reviewed for impairment by comparing the estimated future
undiscounted cash flows to be generated by the asset to its carrying value. If such cash flows are
less than the assets carrying value, the carrying value is written down to its estimated fair
value. In determining estimated future cash flows for purposes of the impairment test, we
incorporate current market assumptions based on general economic conditions such as anticipated
estimated revenues and estimated costs. These assumptions can significantly affect our estimates of
future cash flows.
Our estimate of the right-of-way acquisition, development and construction costs for the
Poinciana Parkway approximates $175,000 to $200,000. However, no assurance of the ultimate costs
can be given at this stage. As of December 31, 2009, approximately $47,000 has been expended.
During fiscal year 2008, we recorded impairment charges of $30,228, associated with the Poinciana
Parkway.
We review the recoverability of the carrying value of the Poinciana Parkway on a quarterly
basis in accordance with authoritative accounting guidance. Based on our reviews during 2009, we
determined the estimated future undiscounted cash flows of the Poinciana Parkway were less than its
carrying value. During 2009, we recognized impairment losses of $8,108. At December 31, 2009, the
carrying value of the Poinciana Parkway is $8,482. In addition, non-capitalizable expenditures of
$341 related to the Poinciana Parkway were expensed during 2009.
Commercial and Industrial and Other Land Sales
We also generate revenues through the sale of commercial and industrial land for third-party
development, primarily in Poinciana, and other land sales. Revenues from commercial and industrial
and other land sales vary from year to year depending upon demand, ensuing negotiations and timing
of closings. Demand for, and values of, commercial, industrial and other land have decreased
significantly.
25
|
|
|
Item 7. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(dollars in thousands except per share data) continued |
Other Operations
We also generate revenues through rental and other operations, including a small community
shopping center in Rio Rico, recreational facilities and title insurance agency operations.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
In the preparation of our financial statements, we apply United States generally accepted
accounting principles. The application of U.S. generally accepted accounting principles may require
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial
statements and accompanying results.
Revenue Recognition
As discussed in Note A to the Consolidated Financial Statements, in accordance with Accounting
Standards Codification (ASC) 360, revenues from the sales of housing units are recognized when the
sales are closed and title passes to the purchasers. In addition, revenues from commercial,
industrial and other land sales are recognized in full at closing, provided the purchasers initial
and continuing investment is adequate, all financing is considered collectible and there is no
significant continuing involvement. As a result, our revenue recognition process does not involve
significant judgments or estimations.
Impairments of Long-Lived Assets
Each reporting period, we review our long-lived assets for indicators of impairment in
accordance with ASC 360-10, Property, Plant and Equipment (ASC 360-10). Long-lived assets that we
evaluate are our Land and Other Inventories, Property and Equipment and the Poinciana Parkway. The
following is a discussion of each of these types of long-lived assets:
Impairments of Land and Other Inventories
Land and Other Inventories that are subject to a review for indicators of impairment include
our: (i) housing communities (primary residential, including scattered lots, and active adult) and
(ii) land developed and/or held for future development or sale. In accordance with ASC 360-10, Land
and Other Inventories are stated at cost unless the asset is determined to be impaired, in which
case the asset would be written down to its fair value. Land and Other Inventories include
expenditures for land acquisition, construction, land development and direct and allocated costs.
Land and Other Inventories owned and constructed by us also include interest cost capitalized until
development and construction are substantially completed. Land and development costs, construction
and direct and allocated costs are assigned to components of Land and Other Inventories based on
specific identification or other allocation methods based upon United States generally accepted
accounting principles.
For assets held and used, if indicators are present, we perform an impairment test in which
the asset is reviewed for impairment by comparing the estimated future undiscounted cash flows to
be generated by the asset to its carrying value. If such cash flows are less than the assets
carrying value, the carrying value is written down to its estimated fair value. Generally, fair
value is determined by discounting the estimated cash flows at a rate commensurate with the
inherent risks associated with the asset and related estimated cash flow streams. Assumptions and
estimates used in the determination of the estimated future cash flows are based on
expectations of future operations and economic conditions and certain factors described below.
Changes to these assumptions could significantly affect the estimates of future cash flows which
could affect the potential for future impairments. Due to the uncertainties of the estimation
process, actual results could differ significantly from such estimates.
For assets held for sale (such as completed speculative housing inventory), we perform an
impairment test in which the asset is reviewed for impairment by comparing the fair value
(estimated sales prices) less cost to sell the asset to its carrying value. If such fair value less
cost to sell is less than the assets carrying value, the carrying value is written down to its
estimated fair value less cost to sell.
26
|
|
|
Item 7. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(dollars in thousands except per share data) continued |
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES continued
We evaluate our Land and Other Inventories for impairment on a quarterly basis. During 2009,
our impairment assessment resulted in impairment charges of $13,739, which included $1,820 relating
to homes completed or under construction and $11,919 related to land sold to LLCs which are
consolidated for financial reporting purposes. Our evaluation of land developed and/or held for
future development or sale did not result in impairment charges during 2009. As of December 31,
2009, other than the Land and Other Inventories that we determined to be impaired and accordingly
wrote down to their carrying value, we had no long-lived assets that had undiscounted cash flows
within 25% of their carrying values.
The impairment charges for the fourth quarter of 2008 and for the year ended December 31, 2009
reflect market conditions, including a significant oversupply of homes available for sale, higher
foreclosure activity and significant competition. We have experienced difficulty in selling homes
at a profit causing us to reduce prices to monetize our inventory. Contribution margins are defined
as house sales prices less direct production costs (including the lot cost) as well as closing
costs and commissions. During 2009, most of our sales contracts were signed at selling prices that
have resulted or will result in losses upon closing when factoring in operating costs such as sales
and marketing and divisional overhead. During 2009, we recorded impairment charges of $1,820,
relating to homes completed or under construction. The following significant trends were utilized
in the evaluation of our land and other inventories for impairment:
|
|
|
The average price on sales closed from primary residential homebuilding operations
has decreased approximately 49% from $323 in fiscal year 2006 to $166 during fiscal year
2009. Our average sales price on sales contracts entered into during fiscal 2009
declined to $157 compared to $242 during 2008. Additionally, the average contribution
margin on closings from primary residential homebuilding operations has declined from
approximately 33% in fiscal year 2006 to approximately 6% during fiscal 2009. |
|
|
|
|
The average price on sales closed from active adult homebuilding operations has
decreased approximately 19% from $298 in fiscal year 2006 to $242 during fiscal year
2009. Our average sales price on sales contracts entered into during 2009 declined to
$211 compared to $232 during 2008. Additionally, the average contribution margin on
closings from active adult homebuilding operations has declined from approximately 32%
in fiscal year 2006 to approximately 16% during fiscal 2009. |
Land and Other Inventories that are subject to a review for indicators of impairment include
our: (i) housing communities (primary residential, including scattered lots, and active adult) and
(ii) land developed and/or held for future development or sale. A discussion of the factors that
impact our impairment assessment for these categories follows:
Housing communities: Activities include the development of active adult and primary
residential communities and the operation of amenities. The operating results and losses generated
from active adult and primary residential communities during 2009 and 2008 include operating
expenses relating to the operation of the amenities in our communities as well as divisional
overhead not associated with specific communities.
27
|
|
|
Item 7. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(dollars in thousands except per share data) continued |
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES continued
Our active adult and primary residential communities are generally large master-planned
communities in Florida and in southeast Arizona. Several of these communities are long term
projects on land we have owned for many years. In reviewing each of our communities, we determine
if potential impairment indicators exist by reviewing, among other factors, actual contribution
margins on homes closed in recent months, projected contribution margins on homes in backlog,
projected contribution margins on speculative homes, average selling prices, sales activities and
local market conditions. If indicators are present, the asset is reviewed for impairment. In
determining estimated future cash flows for purposes of the impairment test, the estimated future
cash flows are significantly impacted by specific community factors such as: (i) sales absorption
rates; (ii) estimated sales prices and sales incentives; and (iii) estimated cost of home
construction, estimated land development costs, interest costs, indirect construction and overhead
costs, and selling and marketing costs. In addition, our estimated future cash flows are also
impacted by general economic and local market conditions, competition from other homebuilders,
foreclosures and depressed home sales in the areas in which we build and sell homes, product
desirability in our local markets and the buyers ability to obtain mortgage financing. Build-out
of our active adult and primary residential communities generally exceed five years. Our current
assumptions are based on current activity and recent trends at our active adult and primary
residential communities. There are a significant number of assumptions with respect to each
analysis. Many of these assumptions extend over a significant number of years. The substantial
number of variables to these assumptions could significantly affect the potential for future
impairments.
Declines in contribution margins below those realized from our current sales prices and
estimations could result in future impairment losses in one or more of our housing communities.
Land developed and/or held for future development or sale: Our land developed and/or
held for future development or sale represents land holdings for the potential development of
future active adult and/or primary residential communities. We anticipate these future communities
will be large master-planned communities similar to our current active adult and/or primary
residential communities. For land developed and/or held for future development or sale, indicators
of potential impairment include changes in use, changes in local market conditions, declines in the
selling prices of similar assets and increases in costs. If indicators are present, the asset is
reviewed for impairment. In determining estimated future cash flows for purposes of the impairment
test, the estimated future sales prices and sales incentives; and (iii) estimated costs of home
construction, estimated land and land development costs, interest costs, indirect construction and
overhead costs, and selling and marketing costs. In addition, our estimated future cash flows are
also impacted by general economic and local market conditions, competition from other homebuilders,
foreclosures and depressed home sales in the areas where we own land for future development,
product desirability in our local markets and the buyers ability to obtain mortgage financing.
Factors that we consider in determining the appropriateness of moving forward with land development
or whether to write-off the related amounts capitalized include: our current inventory levels,
local market economic conditions, availability of adequate resources; and the estimated cash flows
are significantly impacted by specific community factors such as: (i) sales absorption rates; (ii)
estimated write-off of the related amounts capitalized including: our current inventory levels,
local market economic conditions, availability of adequate resources and the estimated future net
cash flows to be generated from the project. Build-out of our land held for future development
generally exceed five years. There are a significant number of assumptions with respect to each
analysis. Many of these assumptions extend over a significant number of years. The substantial
number of variables to these assumptions could significantly affect the potential for future
impairments.
Declines in market values below those realized from our current sales prices and estimations
could result in future impairment.
28
|
|
|
Item 7. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(dollars in thousands except per share data) continued |
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES continued
Impairments of Property and Equipment
Property and Equipment are stated at cost and depreciation is computed by the straight-line
method over the following estimated useful lives of the assets: land improvements 10 to 25 years;
buildings and improvements 8 to 39 years; and machinery, equipment and fixtures 3 to 7 years.
Maintenance and operating expenses of equipment utilized in the development of land are capitalized
as land inventory cost. Repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred.
Property and Equipment includes the cost of amenities owned by us. The cost of amenities
includes expenditures for land acquisition, construction, land development and direct and allocated
costs. Property and Equipment owned and constructed by us also includes interest cost incurred
during development and construction.
Each reporting period, we review our Property and Equipment for indicators of impairment in
accordance with ASC 360-10. For our amenities, which are located within our housing communities,
indicators of potential impairment are similar to those of our housing communities (described
above) as these factors may impact our ability to generate revenues at our amenities or cause
construction costs to increase. In addition, we factor in the collectibility and potential
delinquency of the fees due for our amenities. During 2009, we recorded an impairment expense of
approximately $2,100 related to the amenities at Terralargo due to the sale to an LLC at a price
which was less than the carrying value. As we consolidated this LLC for financial reporting
purposes, the transaction did not qualify as a sale.
Impairments of Poinciana Parkway
In December 2006, we entered into agreements with Osceola County, Florida and Polk County,
Florida for us to develop and construct at our cost a 9.66 mile four-lane road in Osceola and Polk
Counties, to be known as the Poinciana Parkway (the Poinciana Parkway). The Poinciana Parkway is
to include a 4.15 mile segment to be operated as a toll road. We have acquired right-of-way and
federal and state environmental permits necessary to construct the Poinciana Parkway. In July 2008
and August 2008, we entered into amended and restated agreements with Osceola County and Polk
County, pursuant to which construction is to be commenced by February 14, 2011. Construction was to
be completed by December 31, 2011 subject to extension for Force Majeure. We have notified the
Counties that the completion date has been extended to October 14, 2013 due to Force Majeure
related to the economic downturn. We advised the Counties that the current economic downturn has
resulted in our inability to: (i) conclude negotiations with potential investors; or (ii)
obtain financing for the construction of the Poinciana Parkway.
If funding for the Poinciana Parkway is not obtained so that construction of the Poinciana
Parkway can be commenced by February 14, 2011 as required by our agreements with Osceola County and
Polk County, the Counties have no right to obtain damages or sue Avatar for specific performance.
Polk Countys sole remedy under its agreement with Avatar is to cancel such agreement if Avatar
does not construct the Poinciana Parkway. If the construction of the Parkway is not funded and
commenced by February 14, 2011, (i) a portion of Avatars land in Osceola County will become
subject to Osceola traffic concurrency requirements applicable generally to other home builders in
the County and (ii) Avatar will be required to contribute approximately $1,900 towards the
construction cost of certain traffic improvements in Osceola County that it otherwise might have
been obligated to build or fund if it had not agreed to construct the Poinciana Parkway. Avatar is
investigating the availability of an extension of the Poinciana Parkway permits and the related
deadlines in its agreements with the Counties.
Osceola County and Avatar were unsuccessful in their attempt to obtain a federal grant for
construction of the Parkway. Osceola County and Avatar are still attempting to obtain other
federal funds for development of the Poinciana Parkway, including tax appropriation and a federal
loan. We cannot predict whether any federal funds will be available.
29
|
|
|
Item 7. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(dollars in thousands except per share data) continued |
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES continued
For the Poinciana Parkway, indicators of impairment are general economic conditions, rate of
population growth and estimated change in traffic levels. If indicators are present, we perform an
impairment test in which the asset is reviewed for impairment by comparing the estimated future
undiscounted cash flows to be generated by the asset to its carrying value. If such cash flows are
less than the assets carrying value, the carrying value is written down to its estimated fair
value. In determining estimated future cash flows for purposes of the impairment test, we
incorporate current market assumptions based on general economic conditions such as anticipated
estimated revenues and estimated costs. These assumptions can significantly affect our estimates of
future cash flows.
Our estimate of the right-of-way acquisition, development and construction costs for the
Poinciana Parkway approximates $175,000 to $200,000. However, no assurance of the ultimate costs
can be given at this stage. As of December 31, 2009, approximately $47,000 has been expended.
During fiscal year 2008, we recorded impairment charges of $30,228 associated with the Poinciana
Parkway.
We review the recoverability of the carrying value of the Poinciana Parkway on a quarterly
basis in accordance with authoritative accounting guidance. Based on our reviews during 2009, we
determined the estimated future undiscounted cash flows of the Poinciana Parkway were less than its
carrying value. During 2009, we recognized impairment losses of $8,108. At December 31, 2009, the
carrying value of the Poinciana Parkway is $8,482. In addition, non-capitalizable expenditures of
$341 related to the Poinciana Parkway were expensed during 2009.
Variable Interest Entities
ASC 810, Consolidation (ASC 810), requires a variable interest entity (VIE) to be
consolidated in the financial statements of a company if that company is the primary beneficiary of
the VIE. Under ASC 810, the primary beneficiary of a VIE is the entity which absorbs a majority of
the VIEs expected losses, receives a majority of the VIEs expected residual returns, or both.
Entities determined to be VIEs, for which we are not the primary beneficiary, are accounted for
under the equity method.
We participate in entities with equity interests ranging from 20% to 50% for the purpose of
acquiring and/or developing land in which we may or may not have a controlling interest. These
entities are VIEs and our investments in these entities, along with other arrangements represent
variable interests, depending on the contractual terms of the arrangement. We analyze these
entities in accordance with ASC 810 when they are entered into or upon a reconsideration event.
Income Taxes
Income taxes have been provided using the liability method under ASC 740, Income Taxes (ASC
740). The liability method is used in accounting for income taxes where deferred income tax
assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between financial reporting and tax
basis of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that are
expected to be in effect when the differences reverse.
On November 6, 2009, the Worker, Homeownership, and Business Assistance Act of 2009 was
enacted into law and amended Section 172 of the Internal Revenue Code to extend the permitted
carryback period for offsetting certain net operating losses (NOLs) against earnings for up to five
years. Due to this recently enacted federal tax legislation, Avatar intends to carry back and
intends to apply its 2009 NOL against earnings it generated in the five previous years. As a
result, Avatar intends to file an application for a federal tax refund of $34,248 which is included
in income tax receivable on our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2009.
30
|
|
|
Item 7. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(dollars in thousands except per share data) continued |
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES continued
In accordance with ASC 740, Avatar evaluates its deferred tax assets quarterly to determine if
valuation allowances are required. ASC 740 requires that companies assess whether valuation
allowances should be established based on the consideration of all available evidence using a more
likely than not standard. During 2008, we established a valuation allowance against our deferred
tax assets. Based on our evaluation during the year ended December 31, 2008, we recorded an
additional valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets generated as a result of our net
loss during the year ended December 31, 2008. Our cumulative loss position over the evaluation
period and the uncertain and volatile market conditions provided significant evidence supporting
the need for a valuation allowance. During the first nine months of 2009, we recognized an increase
of $9,522 in the valuation allowance. However due to the new federal tax legislation, we decreased
the valuation allowance for the year ended December 31, 2009 by $9,148. As of December 31, 2009,
our deferred tax asset valuation allowance was $10,419. In future periods, the allowance could be
reduced based on sufficient evidence indicating that it is more likely than not that a portion of
our deferred tax assets will be realized.
In 2006, we closed on substantially all of the land sold under the threat of condemnation, and
in 2007 we closed on the remainder. We believe these transactions entitled us to defer the payment
of income taxes of $24,355 from the gain on these sales. During October 2009, we received from the
Internal Revenue Service a final extension until December 31, 2010 to obtain replacement property
to defer the entire payment of income taxes. It is our intention to acquire replacement property by
December 31, 2010. It is possible that we may not identify and purchase adequate replacement
property within the required time period, which would require us to make this income tax payment
plus interest as of December 31, 2010. We believe the tax planning strategy is prudent and
feasible, and we have the ability and intent to purchase and sell, if necessary, replacement
property to realize these deferred tax assets.
Warranty Reserves
Warranty reserves for houses are established to cover estimated costs for materials and labor
with regard to warranty-type claims to be incurred subsequent to the closing of a house. Reserves
are determined based on historical data and other relevant factors. On homes built by Avatar, we
may have recourse against subcontractors for claims relating to workmanship and materials. Actual
future warranty costs could differ from our currently estimated amounts.
Construction Reserves
Construction reserves for closed houses are established to cover potential costs for
completion of houses closed. These reserves are determined on a per house basis based on estimated
house budgets and other relevant factors. Actual construction costs could differ from our currently
estimated amounts.
Estimated Development Liability
The estimated development liability consists primarily of utilities improvements in Poinciana
and Rio Rico for more than 8,000 homesites previously sold. The estimated development liability for
sold land is reduced by actual expenditures and is evaluated and adjusted, as appropriate, to
reflect managements estimate of anticipated costs. In addition, we obtain third-party engineer
evaluations and adjust this liability to reflect changes in the estimated costs. We recorded
charges of approximately $592, $710 and $386 during 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively, associated
with these obligations. Future increases or decreases of costs for construction material and labor,
as well as other land development and utilities infrastructure costs, may have a significant effect
on the estimated development liability.
31
|
|
|
Item 7. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(dollars in thousands except per share data) continued |
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES continued
Share-Based Compensation
The Amended and Restated 1997 Incentive and Capital Accumulation Plan (2005 Restatement), as
amended, (the Incentive Plan) provides for the grant of stock options, stock appreciation rights,
stock awards, performance awards, and stock units to officers, employees and directors of Avatar.
Generally, the exercise prices of stock options may not be less than the stock exchange closing
price of our common stock on the date of grant. Stock option awards under the Incentive Plan
generally expire 10 years after the date of grant.
The calculation of the fair values of our stock-based compensation plans requires estimates
that require managements judgments. Under ASC 718, the fair value of awards of restricted stock
and units which do not contain a specified hurdle price condition is based on the market price of
our common stock on the date of grant. Under ASC 718, the fair value of restricted stock awards
which contain a specified hurdle price condition is estimated on the grant date using the
Monte-Carlo option valuation model (like a lattice model). Under ASC 718, the fair value of each
stock option is estimated on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The
valuation models require assumptions and estimates to determine expected volatility, expected life,
expected dividends and expected risk-free interest rates. The expected volatility was determined
using historical volatility of our stock based on the contractual life of the award. The risk-free
interest rate assumption was based on the yield on zero-coupon U.S. Treasury strips at the award
grant date. We also used historical data to estimate forfeiture experience.
In May 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued ASC Subtopic 470-20, Debt
with Conversion Options Cash Conversion (ASC 470-20). This guidance applies to convertible debt
instruments that, by their stated terms, may be settled in cash (or other assets) upon conversion,
including partial cash settlement of the conversion option. This guidance requires the issuer of
certain convertible debt instruments that may be settled in cash on conversion to separately
account for the liability (debt) and equity (conversion option) components of the instrument in a
manner that reflects the issuers nonconvertible debt borrowing rate. ASC 470-20 requires
bifurcation of the instrument into a debt component that is initially recorded at fair value and an
equity component. The difference between the fair value of the debt component and the initial
proceeds from issuance of the instrument is recorded as a component of equity. In addition,
transaction costs incurred directly related to the issuance of convertible debt instruments are
allocated to the liability and equity components in proportion to the allocation of proceeds and
accounted for as debt issuance costs and equity issuance costs, respectively. The excess of the
principal amount of the liability component over its carrying amount and the debt issuance costs
are amortized to interest cost using the interest method over the expected life of a similar
liability that does not have an associated equity component. The equity component is not
subsequently re-valued as long as it continues to qualify for equity treatment. This guidance must
be applied retrospectively to previously issued convertible instruments that may be settled in
cash, as well as prospectively to newly issued instruments. We adopted this new guidance on January
1, 2009.
RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
Effective July 1, 2009, we adopted the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 105-10, Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
Overall (ASC 105-10). ASC 105-10 establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (the
Codification) as the source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be
applied by nongovernmental entities in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with
U.S. GAAP. Rules and interpretive releases of the SEC under authority of federal securities laws
are also sources of authoritative U.S. GAAP for SEC registrants. All guidance contained in the
Codification carries an equal level of authority. The Codification superseded all existing non-SEC
accounting and reporting standards. All other non-grandfathered, non-SEC accounting literature not
included in the Codification is non-authoritative. The FASB will not issue new standards in the
form of Statements, FASB Staff Positions or Emerging Issues Task Force Abstracts. Instead, it will
issue Accounting Standards Updates (ASUs). The FASB will not consider ASUs as authoritative in
their own right. ASUs will serve only to update the Codification, provide background information
about the guidance and provide the bases for conclusions on the change(s) in the Codification.
References made to FASB guidance throughout this document have been updated for the Codification.
32
|
|
|
Item 7. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(dollars in thousands except per share data) continued |
RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS continued
Effective January 1, 2009, we adopted FASB ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations (ASC 805).
ASC 805 establishes principles and requirements for recognizing and measuring identifiable assets
and goodwill acquired, liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree. It
also provides disclosure requirements to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the
nature and financial effects of the business combination. The adoption of this topic did not have
an impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows as no
business acquisitions have been consummated after January 1, 2009.
Effective April 1, 2009, we adopted FASB ASC 855-10, Subsequent Events Overall (ASC
855-10). ASC 855-10 establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that
occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to
be issued. It requires the disclosure of the date through which an entity has evaluated subsequent
events and the basis for that date that is, whether that date represents the date the financial
statements were issued or were available to be issued. This disclosure should alert users of
financial statements that an entity has not evaluated subsequent events after that date in the set
of financial statements being presented. Adoption of ASC 855-10 did not have a material impact on
our consolidated results of operations or financial condition.
In April 2009, the FASB issued ASC 320-10-65, Investments Debt and Equity Securities
Overall Transition and Open Effective Date Information (ASC 320-10-65). ASC 320-10-65 amends
the other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) guidance in U.S. GAAP to make the guidance more
operational and to improve the presentation of other-than-temporary impairments in the financial
statements. The adoption of ASC 320-10-65 was effective June 30, 2009 for us, which did not have a
material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In June 2008, the FASB issued ASC 260-10-45-61A, Determining Whether Instruments Granted in
Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities (ASC 260-10-45-61A). Under ASC
260-10-45-61A, unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends
or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and shall be included
in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. This guidance was
effective for us on January 1, 2009, which did not have an impact on our consolidated financial
position, results of operations or cash flows as our unvested share-based awards do not contain
rights to receive non-forfeitable dividends.
In June 2009, the FASB issued ASC 810, Consolidation (ASC 810). This guidance requires an
enterprise to determine whether its variable interest or interests give it a controlling financial
interest in a variable interest entity. The primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity is
the enterprise that has both (1) the power to direct the activities of a variable interest entity
that most significantly impact the entitys economic performance and (2) the obligation to absorb
losses of the entity that could potentially be significant to the variable interest entity or the
right to receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the variable
interest entity. ASC 810 requires ongoing reassessments of whether an enterprise is the primary
beneficiary of a variable interest entity. ASC 810 is effective for all variable interest entities
and relationships with variable interest entities existing as of January 1, 2010. We are currently
evaluating the impact of adopting this standard on our consolidated financial position or results
of operations.
In December 2007, the FASB issued ASC 810-10-65, Transition and Open Effective Date
Information (ASC 810-10-65). This guidance establishes accounting and reporting standards
pertaining to ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent, the amount
of net income attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest, changes in a parents
ownership interest, and the valuation of any retained noncontrolling equity investment when a
subsidiary is deconsolidated. ASC 810-10-65 also establishes disclosure requirements that clearly
identify and distinguish between the interests of the parent and the interests of the
noncontrolling owners. ASC 810-10-65 was adopted on January 1, 2009, which did not have an impact
on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows as all our subsidiaries
are wholly-owned and there has been no deconsolidation of a subsidiary after January 1, 2009.
33
|
|
|
Item 7. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(dollars in thousands except per share data) continued |
RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS continued
In August 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-5, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic
820) Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value (ASU 2009-5). This update provides clarification of
the fair value measurement of financial liabilities when a quoted price in an active market for an
identical liability (level 1 input of the valuation hierarchy) is not available. ASU 2009-5 was
effective in the fourth quarter of 2009 and did not have a material impact on our financial
statements or disclosures.
Non-controlling Interest
Avatar has consolidated certain LLCs which qualify as VIEs, because we determined that Avatar
is the primary beneficiary. Therefore, the LLCs financial statements are consolidated in Avatars
consolidated financial statements and the other partners equity in each of the LLCs is classified
as non-controlling interest as a component of consolidated stockholders equity.
34
|
|
|
Item 7. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(dollars in thousands except per share data) continued |
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The discussion in this section may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of
the Private Securities Litigation Act of 1995. Please see our discussion under the heading
Forward-Looking Statements above.
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of
operations should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes
thereto included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. In the preparation of our financial
statements, we apply United States generally accepted accounting principles. The application of
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles may require management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying results.
The following table provides a comparison of certain financial data related to our operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Operating income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Primary residential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
26,968 |
|
|
$ |
38,217 |
|
|
$ |
158,642 |
|
Expenses (1) |
|
|
35,071 |
|
|
|
81,350 |
|
|
|
137,561 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating income (loss) |
|
|
(8,103 |
) |
|
|
(43,133 |
) |
|
|
21,081 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active adult communities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
32,604 |
|
|
|
42,491 |
|
|
|
92,180 |
|
Expenses (2) |
|
|
38,217 |
|
|
|
49,216 |
|
|
|
78,918 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating income (loss) |
|
|
(5,613 |
) |
|
|
(6,725 |
) |
|
|
13,262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial and other land sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
8,825 |
|
|
|
20,165 |
|
|
|
27,476 |
|
Expenses |
|
|
9,141 |
|
|
|
30,319 |
|
|
|
5,606 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating income (loss) |
|
|
(316 |
) |
|
|
(10,154 |
) |
|
|
21,870 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
995 |
|
|
|
1,537 |
|
|
|
3,215 |
|
Expenses |
|
|
784 |
|
|
|
1,530 |
|
|
|
2,581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating income |
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
(13,821 |
) |
|
|
(60,005 |
) |
|
|
56,847 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated income (expenses): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
657 |
|
|
|
2,453 |
|
|
|
8,144 |
|
Gain on repurchase of 4.50% Notes |
|
|
1,783 |
|
|
|
5,286 |
|
|
|
416 |
|
Equity loss from unconsolidated entities |
|
|
(196 |
) |
|
|
(7,812 |
) |
|
|
(60 |
) |
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
(19,694 |
) |
|
|
(22,388 |
) |
|
|
(25,387 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
(6,857 |
) |
|
|
(4,282 |
) |
|
|
(245 |
) |
Other real estate expenses, net |
|
|
(3,688 |
) |
|
|
(8,424 |
) |
|
|
(5,662 |
) |
Impairment of the Poinciana Parkway |
|
|
(8,108 |
) |
|
|
(30,228 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Impairment of land developed or held for future development |
|
|
(11,919 |
) |
|
|
(16,941 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
(61,843 |
) |
|
|
(142,341 |
) |
|
|
34,053 |
|
Income tax benefit (expense) |
|
|
32,860 |
|
|
|
32,465 |
|
|
|
(13,056 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
($ |
28,983 |
) |
|
($ |
109,876 |
) |
|
$ |
20,997 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes impairment charges of approximately $1,449, $34,332 and $2,469 for 2009,
2008 and 2007, respectively. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes impairment charges for inventory of approximately $371 and $625 for 2009 and
2008, respectively, and $1,685 for goodwill for
2008. |
35
|
|
|
Item 7. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations (dollars in thousands except per share data) continued |
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS continued
Data from closings for the primary residential and active adult homebuilding segments for the
years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 is summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Price Per |
|
Years ended December 31, |
|
Number of Units |
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
Unit |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Primary residential |
|
|
143 |
|
|
$ |
23,786 |
|
|
$ |
166 |
|
Active adult communities |
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
21,041 |
|
|
$ |
242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
230 |
|
|
$ |
44,827 |
|
|
$ |
195 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Primary residential |
|
|
136 |
|
|
$ |
35,803 |
|
|
$ |
263 |
|
Active adult communities |
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
30,257 |
|
|
$ |
273 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
247 |
|
|
$ |
66,060 |
|
|
$ |
267 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Primary residential |
|
|
535 |
|
|
$ |
154,599 |
|
|
$ |
289 |
|
Active adult communities |
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
81,330 |
|
|
$ |
332 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
780 |
|
|
$ |
235,929 |
|
|
$ |
302 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Data from contracts signed for the primary residential and active adult homebuilding segments
for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 is summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contracts Signed, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Price Per |
|
Years ended December 31, |
|
Contracts Signed |
|
|
Cancellations |
|
|
Cancellations |
|
|
Dollar Value |
|
|
Unit |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Primary residential |
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
143 |
|
|
$ |
22,408 |
|
|
$ |
157 |
|
Active adult communities |
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
11,810 |
|
|
$ |
211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
199 |
|
|
$ |
34,218 |
|
|
$ |
172 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Primary residential |
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
80 |
|
|
$ |
19,343 |
|
|
$ |
242 |
|
Active adult communities |
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
17,665 |
|
|
$ |
232 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
266 |
|
|
|
(110 |
) |
|
|
156 |
|
|
$ |
37,008 |
|
|
$ |
237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Primary residential |
|
|
508 |
|
|
|
(233 |
) |
|
|
275 |
|
|
$ |
60,060 |
|
|
$ |
218 |
|
Active adult communities |
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
31,707 |
|
|
$ |
308 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
662 |
|
|
|
(284 |
) |
|
|
378 |
|
|
$ |
91,767 |
|
|
$ |
243 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
Item 7. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(dollars in thousands except per share data) continued |
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS continued
Backlog for the primary residential and active adult homebuilding segments as of December 31,
2009, 2008 and 2007 is summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Price |
|
As of December 31, |
|
Number of Units |
|
|
Dollar Volume |
|
|
Per Unit |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Primary residential |
|
|
16 |
|
|
$ |
3,222 |
|
|
$ |
201 |
|
Active adult communities |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
2,247 |
|
|
$ |
250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
25 |
|
|
$ |
5,469 |
|
|
$ |
219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Primary residential |
|
|
16 |
|
|
$ |
4,602 |
|
|
$ |
288 |
|
Active adult communities |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
11,477 |
|
|
$ |
287 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
56 |
|
|
$ |
16,079 |
|
|
$ |
287 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Primary residential |
|
|
72 |
|
|
$ |
21,062 |
|
|
$ |
293 |
|
Active adult communities |
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
24,069 |
|
|
$ |
321 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
147 |
|
|
$ |
45,131 |
|
|
$ |
307 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The number of net housing contracts signed during the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to
the same period in 2008 increased 27.6%. The dollar value of housing contracts signed for the year
ended December 31, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008 declined by 7.5%. Our average sales
price on sales contracts entered into during the year ended December 31, 2009 declined to $172
compared to $237 the year ended December 31, 2008. The decline in the dollar value and average
prices of housing contracts signed for the year ended December 31, 2009 continues to reflect the
weak market for new residences in the geographic areas where our communities are located. Our
communities are located in areas of Florida and Arizona where there is an excess of units for sale,
including foreclosures and assets being sold by lenders, and continued use of various sales
incentives by residential builders in our markets, including Avatar. During the year ended December
31, 2009, cancellations of previously signed contracts totaled 41 compared to 110 during the year
ended December 31, 2008. As a percentage of the gross number of contracts signed, this represents
17% and 41%, respectively.
As of December 31, 2009, our inventory of unsold (speculative) homes, both completed and under
construction, was 144 units (including 87 completed and partially completed homes that we acquired
at Seasons at Tradition) compared to 233 units as of December 31, 2008. As of December 31, 2009,
approximately 83% of unsold homes were completed (including 64 homes that we acquired during
September 2009 at Seasons at Tradition) compared to approximately 88% as of December 31, 2008.
During the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to the year ended December 31, 2008, the
number of homes closed decreased by 6.9% and the related revenues decreased by 32.1%. Our average
sales price for homes closed during the year ended December 31, 2009 declined to $194 compared to
$267 for the year ended December 31, 2008. We anticipate that we will close in excess of 80% of the
homes in backlog as of December 31, 2009 during the subsequent 12-month period, subject to
cancellations by purchasers prior to scheduled delivery dates. We do not anticipate a meaningful
improvement in our markets in the near term. During the year ended December 31, 2008 compared to
the year ended December 31, 2007, the number of homes closed decreased by 68.3% and the related
revenues decreased by 72.0%.
37
|
|
|
Item 7. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(dollars in thousands except per share data) continued |
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS continued
In general, prices of homes sold during 2009 ranged from approximately $60 to approximately
$575 in our primary residential operations. At Solivita and Solivita West, prices ranged from
approximately $125 to approximately $470 on homes sold during 2009. Closings on to-be-built homes
generally occur within 180 to 210 days from sale. Closings on speculative homes generally occur
within 30 to 60 days from sale.
Fiscal Year 2009 Compared to Fiscal Year 2008
Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2009 was ($28,983) or ($3.11) per basic and diluted
share compared to net loss of ($109,876) or ($12.85) per basic and diluted share for the year ended
December 31, 2008. The decrease in net loss for the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to the
year ended December 31, 2008 was primarily due to a decline in the impairment charges recognized
during 2009 as compared to 2008 partially mitigated by increased pre-tax losses from active adult
operating results, increased interest expense and decreases in pre-tax profits from commercial and
industrial and other land sales. In addition, the decrease in pre-tax loss for the year ended
December 31, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008 was partially due to the pre-tax gain on
repurchase of 4.50% Notes.
Revenues from primary residential operations decreased $11,249 or 29.4% for the year ended
December 31, 2009 compared to the same periods in 2008. Expenses from primary residential
operations decreased $46,279 or 56.9% for the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to the year
ended December 31, 2008. The decreases in revenues are primarily attributable to lower average
sales prices in our primary residential homebuilding communities. The decreases in expenses is
attributable to impairment losses of approximately $1,449 for fiscal year 2009 compared to $4,543
for fiscal year 2008 related to homes completed or under construction. In addition, we recorded
$29,789 of impairment charges during fiscal year 2008 related to land developed and/or held for
future development in our primary residential homebuilding communities. The average sales price on
closings from primary residential homebuilding operations for the year ended December 31, 2009 was
$166 compared to $263 for the year ended December 31, 2008. The average contribution margin
(excluding impairment charges) on closings from primary residential homebuilding operations for
fiscal year 2009 was approximately 6% compared to approximately 12% for fiscal year 2008. Included
in the results from primary residential operations are divisional overhead not specifically
allocated to specific communities and our amenity operations. We have been experiencing increased
defaults in payments of club dues for our amenities compared to previous years.
Revenues from active adult operations decreased $9,887 or 23.3% for the year ended December
31, 2009 compared to the year ended December 31, 2008. Expenses from active adult operations
decreased $10,999 or 22.3% for the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to the year ended December
31, 2008. The decrease in revenues for the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to the year ended
December 31, 2008 was primarily attributable to decreased closings and lower average sales prices.
The decrease in expenses for fiscal year 2009 is attributable to lower volume of closings and
goodwill impairment charges of $1,685 recorded during fiscal year 2008. The average sales price on
closings from active adult homebuilding operations for the year ended December 31, 2009 was $242
compared to $273 for the year ended December 31, 2008. The average contribution margin (excluding
impairment charges) on closings from active adult homebuilding operations for the year ended
December 31, 2009 was approximately 16% compared to approximately 27% for the year ended December
31, 2008. Included in the results from active adult operations are divisional overhead not
specifically allocated to specific communities and our amenity operations. We have been
experiencing increased defaults in payments of club dues for our amenities compared to previous
years.
The amount and types of commercial and industrial and other land sold vary from year to year
depending upon demand, ensuing negotiations and the timing of the closings of these sales. Revenues
from commercial and industrial and other land sales decreased $11,340 for the year ended December
31, 2009 compared to the year ended December 31, 2008. During the year ended December 31, 2009, we
realized pre-tax losses of $316 on revenues of $8,825 from sales of commercial, industrial and
other land. Expenses from commercial, industrial and other land sales decreased $21,178 for the
year ended December 31, 2009 compared to the year ended December 31, 2008. The decrease in expenses
is attributable to lower volume of closings of commercial and industrial and other land sales.
38
|
|
|
Item 7. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(dollars in thousands except per share data) continued |
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS continued
For the year ended December 31, 2009, pre-tax profits from sales of commercial and industrial
land were $4,405 on aggregate revenues of $4,758. For the year ended December 31, 2009, pre-tax
losses from other land sales was $4,721 on aggregate revenues of $4,067.
During the year ended December 31, 2009, our impairment assessment resulted in impairment
charges of $13,739, which included $1,820 related to homes completed or under construction and
$11,919 related to LLCs, which are consolidated for financial reporting purposes.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, pre-tax profits (loss) from sales of commercial,
industrial and other land were ($10,154) on revenues of $20,165. For the year ended December 31,
2008, pre-tax profits from commercial and industrial land were $4,916 on aggregate revenues of
$5,785. Pre-tax profits (loss) on sales of other land during the year ended December 31, 2008 were
($20,958) on aggregate revenues of $8,380. During 2008, we closed on the sale of the stock of one
of our wholly-owned subsidiaries, the sole asset of which was land leased to a third-party that
historically generated revenues to Avatar of approximately $600 per annum. Therefore, this sale was
classified for financial statement purposes as a sale of other land. Pre-tax profits on this sale
was $5,888 on revenues of $6,000.
During the fourth quarter of 2008, we identified several assets (land) that we would be
willing to sell to maximize our liquidity. The pre-tax loss from other land sales was primarily
attributable to our decision to sell certain of this land. More specifically, we entered into two
transactions with third parties providing for the formation of LLCs; and subsequently sold
developed and partially-developed land to each of the newly formed LLCs. We also acquired a
minority ownership interest in each of the LLCs and share in the management of each of the LLCs.
These transactions generated aggregate sales proceeds to Avatar of approximately $7,847 on assets
with an aggregate book value of approximately $29,334. We invested approximately $1,626 to acquire
equity interests in these LLCs. These transactions generated a pre-tax loss of approximately
$21,487.
During 2008, an entity in which we own a 50% interest sold all of its real estate assets. This
sale generated a pre-tax loss of approximately $7,100. This loss is included in our equity loss
from unconsolidated entities of $7,812 for 2008.
Revenues from other operations decreased $542 or 35.3% for the year ended December 31, 2009
compared to the year ended December 31, 2008. Expenses from other operations decreased $746 or
48.8% for the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to the year ended December 31, 2008. The
decreases in revenues and expenses are primarily attributable to decreased volume of transactions
from our title insurance agency operations.
Interest income decreased $1,796 or 73.2% for the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to the
year ended December 31, 2008. The decreases are primarily attributable to decreased interest rates
earned on our cash and cash equivalents during 2009 as compared to 2008.
On March 30, 2009, we repurchased $7,500 principal amount of the 4.50% Notes for approximately
$6,038 including accrued interest. This repurchase resulted in a pre-tax gain of approximately
$1,365 which is included in Other Revenues in the consolidated statements of operations for the
year ended December 31, 2009. On June 19, 2009, we repurchased $6,576 principal amount of the 4.50%
Notes for approximately $5,658 including accrued interest. This repurchase resulted in a pre-tax
gain of approximately $418 which is included in Other Revenues in the consolidated statements of
operations for the year ended December 31, 2009. During 2008, we repurchased $35,920 principal
amount of the 4.50% Notes for approximately $28,112 including accrued interest. This repurchase
resulted in a pre-tax gain during the fourth quarter of 2008 of approximately $6,931 including the
write-off of approximately $1,000 of deferred finance costs.
39
|
|
|
Item 7. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(dollars in thousands except per share data) continued |
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS continued
General and administrative expenses decreased $2,694 or 12.0% for the year ended December 31,
2009 compared to the year ended December 31, 2008. The decreases are primarily due to decreases in
compensation expense and share-based compensation expense. The decrease in share-based compensation
was due to the recording during 2008 of $1,089 in accordance with ASC 718 as a result of
amendments to performance conditioned restricted stock units, previously granted to certain
employees, which converted into an equal number of shares of restricted common stock. Each employee
made an Internal Revenue Code Section 83(b) election (the Section 83(b) election) with respect to
all the shares of restricted stock, Avatar agreed to vest a number of shares of restricted stock
having a value approximately equal to the tax withholding amount required as a result of the
Section 83(b) election, at the minimum statutory withholding rates applicable to the employee, and
such shares were repurchased by Avatar. The terms, conditions and restrictions of the restricted
stock, including the vesting and forfeiture provisions, under the amended agreements are otherwise
substantially the same as those that were applicable under the restricted stock unit agreements
except that each employee, as an owner of this restricted stock, generally has the rights of an
Avatar common stockholder, including voting and dividend rights (except that dividends on unvested
shares of restricted stock generally are forfeited unless such shares ultimately vest).
Interest expense increased $2,575 or 60.1% for the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to
the same period in 2008. The increases in interest expense are primarily attributable to the
decrease in the amount of interest expense capitalized due to decreases in development and
construction activities in our various projects.
Other real estate expenses, net, represented by real estate taxes, property maintenance and
miscellaneous income not allocable to specific operations, decreased by $4,736 or 56.2% for the
year ended December 31, 2009 compared to the year ended December 31, 2008. The decreases are
primarily attributable to reductions in real estate taxes and property maintenance costs as well as
an increase in miscellaneous income. These decreases were partially mitigated by an increase in
charges related to the required utilities improvements of more than 8,000 residential homesites in
Poinciana and Rio Rico substantially sold prior to the termination of the retail homesite sales
programs in 1996. During the year ended December 31, 2009, we recognized charges of $592 compared
to $710 during the year ended December 31, 2008. These charges were based on third-party
engineering evaluations. Future increases or decreases of costs for construction, material and
labor as well as other land development and utilities infrastructure costs may have a significant
effect on the estimated development liability. Also included in other real estate expenses for the
year ended December 31, 2009 are non-capitalizable expenditures of $341 related to the Poinciana
Parkway.
We review the recoverability of the carrying value of the Poinciana Parkway on a quarterly
basis in accordance with authoritative accounting guidance. Based on our reviews during 2009, we
determined the estimated future undiscounted cash flows of the Poinciana Parkway were less than its
carrying value. During 2009, we recognized impairment losses of $8,108. In addition,
non-capitalizable expenditures of $341 related to the Poinciana Parkway were expensed during 2009.
Income tax benefit was provided for at an effective tax rate of 53.1% for the year ended
December 31, 2009 compared to 22.8% for the year ended December 31, 2008. In accordance with ASC
740, Avatar evaluates its deferred tax assets quarterly to determine if valuation allowances are
required. ASC 740 requires that companies assess whether valuation allowances should be established
based on the consideration of all available evidence using a more likely than not standard.
During 2008, we established a valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets. Based on our
evaluation during the year ended December 31, 2008, we recorded an additional valuation allowance
against the deferred tax assets generated as a result of our net loss during the year ended
December 31, 2008. Our cumulative loss position over the evaluation period and the uncertain and
volatile market conditions provided significant evidence supporting the need for a valuation
allowance. During the first nine months of 2009, we recognized an increase of $9,522 in the
valuation allowance. However, due to the new federal tax legislation, we decreased the valuation
allowance for the year ended December 31, 2009 by $9,148. As of December 31, 2009, our deferred tax
asset valuation allowance was $10,419. In future periods, the allowance could be reduced based on
sufficient evidence indicating that it is more likely than not that a portion of our deferred tax
assets will be realized. Reference is made to the Income Taxes note to the Consolidated Financial
Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this Report.
40
|
|
|
Item 7. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(dollars in thousands except per share data) continued |
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS continued
Fiscal Year 2008 Compared to Fiscal Year 2007
Net income (loss) for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 was ($109,876) or ($12.85)
per basic and diluted share and $20,997 or $2.22 per diluted share ($2.53 per basic share),
respectively. The decrease in net income for 2008 compared to 2007 was primarily due to impairment
charges recorded during 2008 of $83,811 consisting of $51,899 from Land and Other Inventories,
$30,228 related to the Poinciana Parkway and $1,685 related to goodwill. Also contributing to the
decrease was a loss from operations in 2008 as compared to income from operations in 2007 in
primary residential operations; active adult operating results; commercial and industrial and other
land sales; and other operations. We also had increases in interest expense and other real estate
expenses as well as decreases in interest income which caused net income to decrease in 2008
compared to 2007. The decreases in net income were partially mitigated by decreases in general and
administrative expenses and an increase in other revenue.
Revenues from primary residential operations decreased $120,425 or 75.9% during 2008 compared
to 2007. Expenses from primary residential operations decreased $56,211 or 40.9% during 2008
compared to 2007. The decrease in revenues is primarily attributable to decreased closings and
average sales prices in our primary residential homebuilding communities. The decrease in expenses
is attributable to lower volume of closings partially mitigated by impairment losses of
approximately $34,332 of which $4,543 is related to homes completed or under construction and
$29,789 is related to land developed and/or held for future development in our primary residential
homebuilding operations. The average sales price on closings from primary residential homebuilding
operations for 2008 was $263 compared to $289 for 2007. The average contribution margin (excluding
impairment charges) on closings from primary residential homebuilding operations for 2008 was
approximately 10% compared to approximately 26% for 2007. Included in the results from primary
residential operations are divisional overhead not specifically allocated to specific communities
and our amenity operations. We have been experiencing increased defaults in payments of club dues
for our amenities. We have also incurred higher expenditures to fund homeowner association
operating deficits.
Revenues from active adult operations decreased $49,689 or 53.9% during 2008 compared to 2007.
Expenses from active adult operations decreased $29,702 or 37.6% during 2008 compared to 2007. The
decrease in revenues is attributable to decreased closings and average closing prices. The decrease
in expenses is attributable to lower volume of closings partially mitigated by impairment losses of
approximately $625 related to homes completed or under construction in our active adult
homebuilding operations and a goodwill impairment loss of $1,685. The average sales price on
closings from active adult homebuilding operations for 2008 was $273 compared to $332 for 2007. The
average contribution margin (excluding impairment charges) on closings from active adult
homebuilding operations for 2008 was approximately 24% compared to approximately 32% for 2007.
Included in the results from active adult operations are divisional overhead not specifically
allocated to specific communities and our amenity operations. We have been experiencing increased
defaults in payments of club dues for our amenities. We have also incurred higher expenditures to
fund homeowner association operating deficits.
The amount and types of commercial and industrial and other land sold vary from year to year
depending upon demand, ensuing negotiations and the timing of the closings of these sales. During
2008, revenues from commercial and industrial and other land sales decreased $7,311 compared to
2007. For the year ended December 31, 2008, pre-tax profits (loss) from sales of commercial,
industrial and other land were ($10,154) on revenues of $20,165. Expenses from commercial and
industrial and other land sales increased $24,713 during 2008 compared to 2007. Included in the
caption Expenses are cost of land sold, commissions related to these sales and consulting and legal
fees.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, pre-tax profits from commercial and industrial land were
$4,916 on aggregate revenues of $5,785. Pre-tax profits (loss) on sales of other land during the
year ended December 31, 2008 were ($20,958) on aggregate revenues of $8,380. During 2008, we closed
on the sale of the stock of one of our wholly-owned subsidiaries, the sole asset of which was land
leased to a third-party that historically generated revenues to Avatar of approximately $600 per
annum. Therefore, this sale is classified for financial statement purposes as a sale of other land.
Pre-tax profit on this sale was $5,888 on revenues of $6,000.
41
|
|
|
Item 7. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(dollars in thousands except per share data) continued |
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS continued
During the fourth quarter of 2008, we identified several assets (land) that we would be
willing to sell to maximize our liquidity. The pre-tax loss from other land sales was primarily
attributable to our decision to sell certain land. More specifically, we entered into two
transactions with third parties providing for the formation of LLCs; and subsequently sold
developed and partially-developed land to each of the newly formed LLCs. We also acquired a
minority ownership interest in each of the LLCs and share in the management of each of the LLCs.
These transactions generated aggregate sales proceeds to Avatar of approximately $7,847 on assets
with an aggregate book value of approximately $29,334. We invested approximately $1,626 to acquire
equity interests in these LLCs. These transactions generated a pre-tax loss of approximately
$21,487. For the year ended December 31, 2007, pre-tax profits from commercial and industrial land
were $19,939 on aggregate revenues of $23,577. Pre-tax profits on sales of other land during the
year ended December 31, 2007 were $1,931 on aggregate revenues of $3,899.
During 2008, an entity in which we own a 50% interest sold all of its real estate assets. This
sale generated a pre-tax loss of approximately $7,100. This loss is included in our equity loss
from unconsolidated entities of $7,812 for 2008.
Revenues from other operations decreased $1,678 or 52.2% during 2008 compared to 2007.
Expenses from other operations decreased $1,051 or 40.7% during 2008 compared to 2007. The
decreases in revenues and expenses are primarily attributable to decreased operating results from
our title insurance agency operations due to reduced closings.
Interest income decreased $5,691 or 69.9% during 2008 compared to 2007. The decrease was
primarily attributable to decreased interest rates earned on our cash and cash equivalents and
lower balances of cash and cash equivalents during 2008 compared to 2007.
During 2008, we repurchased $35,920 principal amount of the 4.50% Notes for approximately
$28,112 including accrued interest. This repurchase resulted in a pre-tax gain during the fourth
quarter of 2008 of approximately $5,286.
General and administrative expenses decreased $2,999 or 11.8% during 2008 compared to 2007.
The decrease was primarily due to decreases in compensation expense resulting from the reduction of
employees and professional fees. Partially offsetting the decrease was an increase in share-based
compensation expense of $393 and accrual for pending litigation claims of $650. The increase in
share-based compensation was due to the recording of $1,089 in accordance with ASC 718 as a result
of amendments to performance conditioned restricted stock units, previously granted to certain
employees, which converted into an equal number of shares of restricted common stock. Each employee
made an Internal Revenue Code Section 83(b) election (the Section 83(b) election) with respect to
all the shares of restricted stock, Avatar agreed to vest a number of shares of restricted stock
having a value approximately equal to the tax withholding amount required as a result of the
Section 83(b) election, at the minimum statutory withholding rates applicable to the employee, and
such shares were repurchased by Avatar. The terms, conditions and restrictions of the restricted
stock, including the vesting and forfeiture provisions, under the amended agreements are otherwise
substantially the same as those that were applicable under the restricted stock unit agreements
except that each employee, as an owner of this restricted stock, generally has the rights of an
Avatar common stockholder, including voting and dividend rights (except that dividends on unvested
shares of restricted stock generally are forfeited unless such shares ultimately vest).
Interest expense increased $4,037 for 2008 compared to 2007. The increase in interest expense
for 2008 is primarily attributable to the decrease in the amount of interest expense capitalized
due to declines in development and construction activities in our various projects.
42
|
|
|
Item 7. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(dollars in thousands except per share data) continued |
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS continued
Other real estate expenses, net, representing real estate taxes, property maintenance and
miscellaneous income not allocable to specific operations, increased by $2,762 or 48.8% during 2008
compared to 2007. The increase is primarily attributable to a decrease in miscellaneous income
collected during 2008 compared to 2007. Also contributing to the increase is charges related to the
required utilities improvements of more than 8,000 residential homesites in Poinciana and Rio Rico
substantially sold prior to the termination of the retail homesite sales programs in 1996. During
2008, we recorded charges of $710 compared to $386 during 2007. These charges were based on
third-party engineering evaluations. Future increases or decreases of costs for construction,
material and labor as well as other land development and utilities infrastructure costs may have a
significant effect on the estimated development liability.
We reviewed the recoverability of the carrying value of the Poinciana Parkway as of September
30, 2008 and December 31, 2008 in accordance with ASC 360-10. Based on our review, we determined
the estimated future undiscounted cash flows of the Poinciana Parkway were less than its carrying
value. Therefore, we reduced the carrying value of the Poinciana Parkway as of December 31, 2008 to
the estimated fair value of $15,310 and recognized an impairment loss of $30,228 for 2008 of which
$3,000 occurred during the fourth quarter of 2008.
We reviewed the recoverability in accordance with ASC 360-10 of the carrying value of land
developed or held for future development not allocated to a reportable segment. Based on our
review, we determined the estimated future undiscounted cash flows of certain land developed or
held for future development was less than its carrying value. Therefore, we reduced the carrying
value as of December 31, 2008 to the estimated fair value and recognized an impairment loss of
$16,941 for 2008.
Income tax expense (benefit) was provided for at an effective tax rate of 22.8% for 2008
compared to 38.3% for 2007. In the assessment for a valuation allowance, appropriate consideration
is given to all positive and negative evidence related to the realization of the deferred tax
assets. This assessment considers, but is not limited to, the frequency and severity of current and
cumulative losses, forecasts of future profitability, the duration of statutory carryforward
periods, our experience with operating loss and tax credit carryforwards not expiring unused and
tax planning strategies. Based on our assessment, the uncertain and volatile market conditions and
the fact that we are now in a cumulative loss position over the evaluation period, we recorded a
deferred tax asset valuation allowance of $19,567 during the year ended December 31, 2008.
Reference is made to the Income Taxes note to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in
Item 8 of Part II of this Report.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Our primary business activities are capital intensive in nature. Significant capital resources
are required to finance planned primary residential and active adult communities, homebuilding
construction in process, community infrastructure, selling expenses, new projects and working
capital needs, including funding of debt service requirements, operating deficits and the carrying
costs of land.
With the deterioration in the residential land and housing values in Florida and Arizona, we
are focused on maintaining sufficient liquidity. As of December 31, 2009, our cash and cash
equivalents totaled $217,132 including net proceeds of $42,296 received during 2009 from the
issuance of 2,514,391 shares of our common stock. During the year ended December 31, 2009, we
received income tax refunds of $21,356. In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2009, we
spent $11,696 including accrued interest to repurchase $14,076 principal amount of the 4.50% Notes
and $11,175 for inventory acquisitions. As of December 31, 2009, we had borrowings of $55,881
outstanding under the Amended Unsecured Credit Facility. As of December 31, 2009, the
principal amount of the 4.50% Notes outstanding was $64,804.
43
|
|
|
Item 7. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(dollars in thousands except per share data) continued |
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES conitnued
In August 2009, we filed a shelf registration statement on Form S-3 for $500,000 of debt and
equity securities, which was supplemented in September 2009 by a supplemental prospectus for a
public offering of shares of our Common Stock, underwritten by Barclays Capital Inc. (the
Underwriter). We agreed to sell to the Underwriter 2,250,000 shares of our Common Stock, which
were offered to the public at a price of $18.00 per share and discounted to the Underwriter to a
price of $17.10 per share. The Underwriter was granted an over-allotment option to purchase up to
an additional 337,500 shares of Common Stock, at the same offering price to the public and subject
to the same underwriting discount. The closing on the sale of the 2,250,000 shares of Common Stock
occurred on September 28, 2009. Net proceeds to us before expenses were $38,475. On October 6,
2009, we closed on the sale of an additional 264,391 shares of our Common Stock pursuant to the
Underwriters partial exercise of its option to purchase additional shares, which option expired on
October 23, 2009. Net proceeds of the partial exercise of the option were $4,521, resulting in
total net proceeds of the offering, after approximately $700 of offering expenses, of approximately
$42,296. We intend to use the proceeds from the sale for general corporate purposes, including,
without limitation, potential acquisitions of real estate and real estate-related assets.
Our operating cash flows fluctuate relative to the status of development within existing
communities, expenditures for land, new developments and other real estate activities, and sales of
various homebuilding product lines within those communities and other developments and to fund
operating deficits.
For the year ended December 31, 2009, net cash provided by operating activities amounted to
$11,807, primarily as a result of $21,356 we received in income tax refunds related to taxable
losses generated during fiscal 2008 and the monetization of inventory of $29,084 partially offset
by decreases in accrued liabilities and customer deposits of $2,964 and $737, respectively. Net
cash used in investing activities amounted to $621 primarily as a result of expenditures of $422 on
the Poinciana Parkway. Net cash provided by financing activities was $30,550 primarily as a result
of net proceeds of $42,296 from the public offering of our common stock. Partially offsetting the
net cash provided by financing activities was the repurchase for $11,627 of $14,076 principal
amount of the 4.50% Notes and the repayment of $119 in real estate debt.
In 2008, net cash used in operating activities amounted to $8,993. Our use of cash is
primarily attributable to payments of accounts payable and accrued liabilities of $5,188 and a
decrease in customer deposits of $1,305. Net cash used in investing activities amounted to $16,174
as a result of expenditures of $803 for investments in property and equipment primarily for
amenities, expenditures of $13,745 on the Poinciana Parkway and investment in unconsolidated
entities of $1,626. Net cash provided by financing activities of $8,305 resulted from proceeds of
$56,000 and $500 from the Amended Unsecured Credit Facility and exercise of stock options,
respectively. Partially offsetting the cash provided by financing activities was $28,112 used for
the repurchase of 4.50% Notes, $15,855 used for the repayment of real estate debt and $4,493 used
for withholding taxes related to restricted stock and units repurchased or withheld.
In 2007, net cash provided by operating activities amounted to $29,511, primarily as a result
of net income of $21,383, the decrease in land and other inventories of $34,119 and the decrease in
receivables of $6,594. Partially offsetting net cash provided by operating activities is the
decrease in accounts payable and accrued liabilities of $36,404 and a reduction in customer
deposits of $13,435. Net cash used in investing activities amounted to $32,267 as a result of
expenditures of $8,318 for investments in property and equipment primarily for amenities, and
expenditures of $23,648 on the Poinciana Parkway. Net cash used by financing activities of $8,746
resulted from the payment of $6,159 for withholding taxes related to restricted stock units and
earnings participation stock awards, the repurchase for $4,857 of $5,000 principal amount of 4.50%
Notes, the repayment of $959 in real estate debt and the purchase of $965 of treasury stock.
Partially offsetting net cash used by financing activities is proceeds of $2,100 from the exercise
of stock options and $2,094 as a result of excess income tax benefits from the exercise of stock
options and restricted stock units.
44
|
|
|
Item 7. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(dollars in thousands except per share data) continued |
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES continued
In 2006, we closed on substantially all of the land sold under the threat of condemnation, and
in 2007 we closed on the remainder. We believe these transactions entitled us to defer the payment
of income taxes of $24,355 from the gain on these sales. During October 2009, we received from the
Internal Revenue Service a final extension until December 31, 2010 to obtain replacement property
to defer the entire payment of income taxes. It is our intention to acquire replacement property by
December 31, 2010. It is possible that we may not identify and purchase adequate replacement
property within the required time period, which would require us to make this income tax payment
plus interest of approximately $7,000 as of December 31, 2010.
As of December 31, 2009, the amount of our borrowings totaled $119,002 compared to our
borrowings of $131,061 as of December 31, 2008. At December 31, 2009, our borrowings of $119,002
consisted of $63,010 carrying amount of 4.50% Convertible Senior Notes due 2024 (the 4.50%
Notes), $55,881 outstanding under the Amended Unsecured Credit Facility and $111 of 5.50%
community development district term bond obligations due 2010. On March 30, 2009, we repurchased
$7,500 principal amount of the 4.50% Notes for approximately $6,038 including accrued interest. On
June 19, 2009, we repurchased $6,576 principal amount of the 4.50% Notes for approximately $5,658
including accrued interest.
On March 30, 2004, we issued $120,000 aggregate principal amount of 4.50% Convertible Senior
Notes due 2024 (the 4.50% Notes) in a private offering. Interest is payable semiannually on April 1
and October 1. The 4.50% Notes are senior, unsecured obligations and rank equal in right of payment
to all of our existing and future unsecured and senior indebtedness. However, the 4.50% Notes are
effectively subordinated to all of our existing and future secured debt to the extent of the
collateral securing such indebtedness, and to all existing and future liabilities of our
subsidiaries.
Each $1 in principal amount of the 4.50% Notes is convertible, at the option of the holder, at
a conversion price of $52.63, or 19.0006 shares of our common stock, upon the satisfaction of one
of the following conditions: a) during any calendar quarter (but only during such calendar quarter)
commencing after June 30, 2004 if the closing sale price of our common stock for at least 20
trading days in a period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of the
preceding calendar quarter is more than 120% of the conversion price per share of common stock on
such last day; or b) during the five business day period after any five-consecutive-trading-day
period in which the trading price per $1 principal amount of the 4.50% Notes for each day of that
period was less than 98% of the product of the closing sale price for our common stock for each day
of that period and the number of shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of $1 principal
amount of the 4.50% Notes, provided that if on the date of any such conversion that is on or after
April 1, 2019, the closing sale price of Avatars common stock is greater than the conversion
price, then holders will receive, in lieu of common stock based on the conversion price, cash or
common stock or a combination thereof, at our option, with a value equal to the principal amount of
the 4.50% Notes plus accrued and unpaid interest, as of the conversion date. The closing price of
Avatars common stock exceeded 120% ($63.156) of the conversion price for 20 trading days out of 30
consecutive trading days as of the last trading day of the fourth quarter of 2006, as of the last
trading day of the first quarter of 2007 and as of the last trading day of the second quarter of
2007. Therefore, the 4.50% Notes became convertible for the quarter beginning January 1, 2007, for
the quarter beginning April 1, 2007 and for the quarter beginning July 1, 2007. During 2008 and 2009, the
closing price of Avatars common stock did not exceed 120% ($63.156) of the conversion price for 20
trading days out of 30 consecutive trading days; therefore, the 4.50% Notes were not convertible
during 2008 and 2009. During 2007, $200 principal amount of
the 4.50% Notes were converted into 3,800 shares of Avatar common stock. During 2007, Avatar
repurchased $5,000 principal amount of the 4.50% Notes for approximately $4,984 including accrued interest. During 2008, we repurchased $35,920
principal amount of the 4.50% Notes for approximately $28,112 including accrued interest. On March
30, 2009, we repurchased $7,500 principal amount of the 4.50% Notes for approximately $6,038
including accrued interest. This repurchase resulted in a pre-tax gain of approximately $1,365
(which is included in Other Revenues in the consolidated statements of operations for the year
ended December 31, 2009). On June 19, 2009, we repurchased $6,576 principal amount of the 4.50%
Notes for approximately $5,658 including accrued interest. This repurchase resulted in a pre-tax
gain of approximately $418 (which is included in Other Revenues in the consolidated statements of
operations for the year ended December 31, 2009). Following these repurchases, $64,804 principal
amount of the 4.50% Notes remain outstanding.
45
|
|
|
Item 7. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(dollars in thousands except per share data) continued |
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES continued
We may, at our option, redeem for cash all or a portion of the 4.50% Notes at any time on or
after April 5, 2011. Holders may require us to repurchase the 4.50% Notes for cash on April 1,
2011, April 1, 2014 and April 1, 2019; or in certain circumstances involving a designated event, as
defined in the indenture for the 4.50% Notes, holders may require us to purchase all or a portion
of their 4.50% Notes. In each case, we will pay a repurchase price equal to 100% of their
principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any.
As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, the 4.50% Notes and the equity component associated with ASC
470-20 was comprised of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
4.50% Notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal amount |
|
$ |
64,804 |
|
|
$ |
78,880 |
|
Unamortized discount |
|
|
(1,794 |
) |
|
|
(3,930 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net carrying amount |
|
$ |
63,010 |
|
|
$ |
74,950 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Component, net of income tax benefit |
|
$ |
13,737 |
|
|
$ |
13,770 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The discount on the liability component of the 4.50% Notes is amortized using the effective
interest method based on an effective rate of 7.5%, which was the estimated market interest rate
for similar debt without a conversion option on the issuance date. The discount is amortized from
the issuance date in 2004 through April 1, 2011, the first date that holders of the 4.50% Notes can
require us to repurchase the 4.50% Notes. As of December 31, 2009, the remaining expected life over
which the unamortized discount will be recognized is 1.25 years. We recognized $1,549, $2,665 and
$1,136 in non-cash interest charges related to the amortization of the discount during the years
ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
46
|
|
|
Item 7. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(dollars in thousands except per share data) continued |
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES continued
On March 27, 2008, we entered into an Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, by and among our
wholly-owned subsidiary, Avatar Properties Inc., as borrower, Wachovia Bank, National Association
(as a lender and as administrative agent on behalf of the lenders), and certain financial
institutions as lenders (the Amended Unsecured Credit Facility). This agreement amended and
restated the Credit Agreement, dated as of September 20, 2005, as amended. The amendment was made
in anticipation of not meeting certain covenants and/or conditions in the Credit Agreement.
The principal changes effected by the Amended Unsecured Credit Facility included:
|
|
|
a reduction in the amount of the facility from $125,000 to $100,000 (the facility is
expandable up to $150,000, subject to certain conditions and lender approval); |
|
|
|
|
an approval for us to obtain financing for the Poinciana Parkway of up to $140,000,
subject to certain conditions; |
|
|
|
|
modifications to certain covenants including: (i) reducing the minimum adjusted
EBITDA/Debt Service ratio (as defined) from 2.75 to 2.0, and providing for an
alternative requirement of maintaining a maximum leverage ratio and minimum liquidity
level if the minimum adjusted EBITDA/Debt Service ratio cannot be maintained; (ii)
reducing the Leverage Ratio (as defined) from 2.0 to 1.75, and allowing us to net
unrestricted cash in excess of $35,000 against outstanding debt in determining total
liabilities; and (iii) amending our covenant regarding speculative homes and models
whereby if we maintain a Leverage Ratio (as defined) of 1.0 or less, we have no
financial covenant as to the number of speculative homes and models we can maintain;
however, if our Leverage Ratio exceeds 1.0, the number of speculative homes and models
cannot exceed 35% of unit closings for the trailing twelve month period; and |
|
|
|
|
an increased pricing of the facility as follows: (i) the LIBOR Margin is increased
from a range of 1.75% to 2.25% to a range of 2.0% to 2.75%, and depending on our
EBITDA/Debt Service ratio, our rate on outstanding borrowings could be increased up to
an additional 50 basis points; (ii) our fee for outstanding letters of credit increased
from 1% to 50 basis points below our LIBOR Margin; and (iii) our unused fee changed from
25 basis points to a range of 25 basis points to 50 basis points, depending on our
usage. |
The Amended Unsecured Credit Facility includes a $50,000 sublimit for the issuance of standby
letters of credit. The maturity date of the Amended Unsecured Credit Facility remained unchanged,
as September 20, 2010. As of December 31, 2009, we had borrowings of approximately $55,881
outstanding under the Amended Unsecured Credit Facility and had letters of credit totaling $22,535
of which $21,053 were financial/maintenance letters of credit and $1,482 was a performance letter
of credit. Under the Amended Unsecured Credit Facility, performance letters of credit do not count
against our availability for borrowing. Our borrowing rate under the Amended Unsecured Credit Facility was 2.73% as
of December 31, 2009. Our availability is approximately $3,066 as of December 31, 2009.
Also on March 27, 2008, in connection with the Amended Unsecured Credit Facility, Avatar
Holdings Inc., as guarantor, entered into a Second Restated Guaranty Agreement with Wachovia Bank,
National Association (as administrative agent and lender), in favor of certain financial
institutions as lenders (Second Restated Guaranty Agreement). This agreement amended and restated
the Restated Guaranty Agreement, dated as of October 21, 2005. Payments of all amounts due under
the Amended Unsecured Credit Facility are guaranteed by Avatar Holdings Inc. pursuant to the Second Restated Guaranty Agreement.
47
|
|
|
Item 7. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(dollars in thousands except per share data) continued |
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES continued
We are in preliminary discussions with the administrative agent for our unsecured credit
facility regarding an extension. Should we reach an agreement on an extension it is expected to
result in a reduction of our commitment to approximately $50,000 and higher costs for outstanding
borrowings and letters of credit. Further, we anticipate that the facility will be converted to a
secured facility and provide for a paydown of outstanding borrowings while we have cash exceeding a
specified level. These discussions are in preliminary stages, and there can be no assurance that
we will reach an agreement.
On November 7, 2008, Franklin Bank SSB (Franklin Bank), one of the participating financial
institutions in our amended unsecured credit facility, was closed by the Texas Department of
Savings and Mortgage Lending and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) was named
receiver. On January 13, 2010, we received notification from the FDIC that Franklin Bank is no
longer a participant in our amended unsecured credit facility. Franklin Bank was a 20% participant.
On July 23, 2009, Guaranty Bank, one of the participating financial institutions in our
amended unsecured credit facility, announced that it no longer believed it could raise sufficient
capital, therefore, it was not probable that they would be able to continue as a going concern.
Guaranty Bank is a 25% or $25,000 participant in our amended unsecured credit facility. On August
21, 2009, BBVA Compass acquired the banking operations of Guaranty Bank from the FDIC. BBVA Compass
acquired the assets and assumed the deposits and entered into a loss sharing arrangement with the
FDIC that covers all of the acquired loans. BBVA Compass/Guaranty Bank continues to participate in
our Amended Unsecured Credit Facility. The outstanding borrowings under our amended unsecured
credit facility include participation from BBVA Compass/Guaranty Bank in the amount of
approximately $17,877.
Under the terms of the Amended Unsecured Credit Facility, we are required, among other things,
to maintain a Minimum Tangible Net Worth (as defined) and certain financial covenant ratios. The
Minimum Tangible Net Worth is increased each quarter by 25% of positive net income for the most
recently ended fiscal quarter and 75% of the aggregate proceeds from any equity offerings during
the most recently ended fiscal quarter. There is no decrease when we have net losses. As of
December 31, 2009, our Minimum Tangible Net Worth requirement was $292,174.
Financial covenant ratios required under the Amended Unsecured Credit Facility consist of
maintaining at the end of each fiscal quarter a Leverage Ratio (as defined) of not more than 1.75
to 1, 1.50 to 1, 1.25 to 1, or 1.00 to 1; an Adjusted EBITDA/Debt Service Ratio (as defined) that
is equal to or greater than 2.00 to 1; and a Notes Coverage Ratio (as defined) that is greater than
or equal to 2.00 to 1.
If we do not meet the minimum required Adjusted EBITDA/Debt Service Ratio, we can
alternatively comply by maintaining a reduced maximum Leverage Ratio and a minimum ACFFO (Adjusted
Cash Flow from Operations, as defined) Ratio or Liquidity (as defined) requirement. The AFFCO Ratio
requirement is greater than or equal to 1.50 to 1. If we do not meet the minimum required Adjusted
EBITDA/Debt Service Ratio and ACFFO Ratio requirement, we can alternatively comply with a minimum
Liquidity requirement of $50,000 (of which $25,000 is cash) when the EBITDA/Debt Service Ratio is
greater than or equal to 1.00 to 1 and the Leverage Ratio is less than or equal to 1.25 to 1 or we
can alternatively comply with a minimum Liquidity requirement of $75,000 (of which $35,000 is cash)
when the EBITDA/Debt Service Ratio is less than 1.00 to 1 and the Leverage Ratio is less than or
equal to 1.00 to 1.
The Amended Unsecured Credit Facility also contains limitations on investments relating to
real estate related joint ventures; and restrictions on raw land, land under development and
developed lots. Investments relating to real estate related joint ventures cannot exceed 25% of
Tangible Net Worth (as defined). The net book value of raw land, land under development and
developed lots cannot exceed 150% of Tangible Net Worth.
As of December 31, 2009, we were in compliance with the covenants of the Amended Unsecured
Credit Facility.
48
|
|
|
Item 7. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(dollars in thousands except per share data) continued |
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES continued
The following summarizes certain financial covenant thresholds and our results pursuant to the
Amended Unsecured Credit Facility as of December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Covenant |
|
|
Financial Covenant |
|
Requirement |
|
Actual |
Minimum Tangible Net Worth |
|
$292,174 |
|
|
$445,119 |
|
Leverage Ratio (a) |
|
Less than or equal to 1.00 |
|
|
(0.05 |
) |
EBITDA/Debt Service Ratio |
|
(b) |
|
|
(b |
) |
AFFCO Ratio |
|
(b) |
|
|
(b |
) |
Liquidity/Cash Requirements |
|
$75,000/$35,000 |
|
|
$220,198/$217,132 |
|
Notes Coverage Ratio |
|
Greater than or equal to 2.00 |
|
|
4.2 |
|
Investments in real estate
related joint ventures
(as a percent of Tangible
Net Worth) |
|
Less than or equal to 25% |
|
|
1.2 |
% |
Book value of raw land,
land under development
and developed lots (as a
percent of Tangible Net
Worth) |
|
Less than or equal to 150% |
|
|
52 |
% |
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The Leverage Ratio requirement varies based on our Adjusted EBITDA/Debt Service
Ratio. If our Adjusted EBITDA/Debt Service Ratio is greater than or equal to 2.00 to 1,
the Leverage Ratio requirement is less than or equal to 1.75 to 1. If our Adjusted
EBITDA/Debt Service Ratio is greater than or equal to 1.50 to 1, the Leverage Ratio
requirement is less than or equal to 1.50 to 1. If our Adjusted EBITDA/Debt Service
Ratio is greater than or equal to 1.00 to 1, the Leverage Ratio requirement is less
than or equal to 1.25 to 1. If our Adjusted EBITDA/Debt Service Ratio is less than 1.00
to 1, the Leverage Ratio requirement is less than or equal to 1.00 to 1. |
|
(b) |
|
Our Adjusted EBITDA/Debt Service Ratio of negative 5.1 was less than 1.00 to 1
as of December 31, 2009. Our AFFCO Ratio of 3.3 was greater than 1.50 to 1 as of
December 31, 2009. We are required to maintain Liquidity of $75,000 of which $35,000 is
cash and cash equivalents. |
Performance bonds, issued by third party entities, are used primarily to guarantee our
performance to construct improvements in our various communities. As of December 31, 2009, we had
outstanding performance bonds of approximately $3,011. We do not believe that it is likely any of
these outstanding performance bonds will be drawn upon.
In conjunction with the acquisition of developed land in Florida in September 2005 and
September 2004, we assumed approximately $5,900 of Community Development District term bond
obligations due 2010. These term bonds are secured by the land and bear an interest rate of 5.50%.
As of December 31, 2009, we had $111 outstanding under these obligations.
49
|
|
|
Item 7. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(dollars in thousands except per share data) continued |
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES continued
Our Board of Directors has authorized Avatar to make purchases of common stock and/or the
4.50% Notes from time to time, in the open market, through privately negotiated transactions or
otherwise, depending on market and business conditions and other factors. On March 30, 2009, we
repurchased $7,500 principal amount of the 4.50% Notes for approximately $6,038 including accrued
interest. On June 19, 2009, we repurchased $6,576 principal amount of the 4.50% Notes for
approximately $5,658 including accrued interest. As of December 31, 2009, the remaining
authorization is $18,304.
In December 2006, we entered into agreements with Osceola County, Florida and Polk County,
Florida for us to develop and construct at our cost a 9.66 mile four-lane road in Osceola and Polk
Counties, to be known as the Poinciana Parkway (the Poinciana Parkway). The Poinciana Parkway is
to include a 4.15 mile segment to be operated as a toll road. We have acquired right-of-way and
federal and state environmental permits necessary to construct the Poinciana Parkway. In July 2008
and August 2008, we entered into amended and restated agreements with Osceola County and Polk
County, pursuant to which construction is to be commenced by February 14, 2011. Construction was to
be completed by December 31, 2011 subject to extension for Force Majeure. We have notified the
Counties that the completion date has been extended to October 14, 2013 due to Force Majeure
related to the economic downturn. We advised the Counties that the current economic downturn has
resulted in our inability to: (i) conclude negotiations with potential investors; or (ii)
obtain financing for the construction of the Poinciana Parkway.
If funding for the Poinciana Parkway is not obtained so that construction of the Poinciana
Parkway can be commenced by February 14, 2011 as required by our agreements with Osceola County and
Polk County, the Counties have no right to obtain damages or sue Avatar for specific performance.
Polk Countys sole remedy under its agreement with Avatar is to cancel such agreement if Avatar
does not construct the Poinciana Parkway. If the construction of the Parkway is not funded and
commenced by February 14, 2011, (i) a portion of Avatars land in Osceola County will become
subject to Osceola traffic concurrency requirements applicable generally to other home builders in
the County and (ii) Avatar will be required to contribute approximately $1,900 towards the
construction cost of certain traffic improvements in Osceola County that it otherwise might have
been obligated to build or fund if it had not agreed to construct the Poinciana Parkway. Avatar is
investigating the availability of an extension of the Poinciana Parkway permits and the related
deadlines in its agreements with the Counties.
Osceola County and Avatar were unsuccessful in their attempt to obtain a federal grant for
construction of the Parkway. Osceola County and Avatar are still attempting to obtain other
federal funds for development of the Poinciana Parkway, including tax appropriation and a federal
loan. We cannot predict whether any federal funds will be available.
For the Poinciana Parkway, indicators of impairment are general economic conditions, rate of
population growth and estimated change in traffic levels. If indicators are present, we perform an
impairment test in which the asset is reviewed for impairment by comparing the estimated future
undiscounted cash flows to be generated by the asset to its carrying value. If such cash flows are
less than the assets carrying value, the carrying value is written down to its estimated fair
value. In determining estimated future cash flows for purposes of the impairment test, we
incorporate current market assumptions based on general economic conditions such as anticipated
estimated revenues and estimated costs. These assumptions can significantly affect our estimates of
future cash flows.
Our estimate of the right-of-way acquisition, development and construction costs for the
Poinciana Parkway approximates $175,000 to $200,000. However, no assurance of the ultimate costs
can be given at this stage. As of December 31, 2009, approximately $47,000 has been expended.
During fiscal year 2008, we recorded impairment charges of $30,228 associated with the Poinciana
Parkway.
50
|
|
|
Item 7. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(dollars in thousands except per share data) continued |
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES continued
We review the recoverability of the carrying value of the Poinciana Parkway on a quarterly
basis in accordance with authoritative accounting guidance. Based on our reviews during 2009, we
determined the estimated future undiscounted cash flows of the Poinciana Parkway were less than its
carrying value. During 2009, we recognized impairment losses of $8,108. At December 31, 2009, the
carrying value in the Poinciana Parkway is $8,482. In addition, non-capitalizable expenditures of
$341 related to the Poinciana Parkway were expensed during 2009.
Assuming that no additional significant adverse changes in our business occur, we anticipate,
the aggregate cash on hand, cash flow generated through homebuilding and related operations, and
sales of commercial and industrial and other land, will provide sufficient liquidity to fund our
business for 2010. (See Results of Operations Fiscal Year 2010 Outlook.)
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
ASC 810, Consolidation (ASC 810), requires a variable interest entity (VIE) to be
consolidated in the financial statements of a company if that company is the primary beneficiary of
the VIE. Under ASC 810, the primary beneficiary of a VIE is the entity which absorbs a majority of
the VIEs expected losses, receives a majority of the VIEs expected residual returns, or both.
Entities determined to be VIEs, for which we are not the primary beneficiary, are accounted for
under the equity method.
We participate in entities with equity interests ranging from 20% to 50% for the purpose of
acquiring and/or developing land in which we may or may not have a controlling interest. These
entities are VIEs and our investments in these entities, along with other arrangements, represent
variable interests depending on the contractual terms of the arrangement. We analyze these entities
in accordance with ASC 810 when they are entered into or upon a reconsideration event.
Avatar shares in the profits and losses of these unconsolidated entities generally in
accordance with its ownership interests. Avatar and its equity partners make initial or ongoing
capital contributions to these unconsolidated entities on a pro rata basis. The obligation to make
capital contributions is governed by each unconsolidated entitys respective operating agreement.
During 2009 and 2008, we entered into various transactions with unaffiliated third parties
providing for the formation of LLCs; and we subsequently sold developed and partially-developed
land to each of the newly-formed LLCs. We acquired a minority ownership interest in each of the
LLCs and share in the management of each of the LLCs. Avatar made contributions totaling $42 and
$1,626 to these unconsolidated entities in 2009 and 2008, respectively.
As of December 31, 2009, these unconsolidated entities were financed by partner equity and do
not have third-party debt. In addition, we have not provided any guarantees to these entities or
our equity partners.
51
|
|
|
Item 7. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(dollars in thousands except per share data) continued |
DISCLOSURE OF CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
The following table reflects contractual obligations as of December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments due by period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than |
|
1 - 3 |
|
3 - 5 |
|
More than 5 |
Contractual Obligations (1) |
|
Total |
|
1 Year |
|
Years |
|
Years |
|
Years |
Long-Term Debt Obligations |
|
$ |
120,796 |
|
|
$ |
55,992 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
64,804 |
(2) |
Interest Obligations on Long-Term Debt |
|
$ |
42,792 |
|
|
$ |
4,153 |
|
|
$ |
5,832 |
|
|
$ |
5,832 |
|
|
$ |
26,975 |
|
Operating Lease Obligations |
|
$ |
4,131 |
|
|
$ |
952 |
|
|
$ |
1,684 |
|
|
$ |
1,495 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Purchase Obligations Residential Development |
|
$ |
926 |
|
|
$ |
926 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Compensation Obligations |
|
$ |
4,964 |
|
|
$ |
4,188 |
|
|
$ |
776 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Other Long-Term Liabilities Reflected on the
Balance Sheet under GAAP |
|
$ |
20,417 |
|
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,000 |
|
|
$ |
15,417 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Excluded from this table are future costs related to the Poinciana Parkway
(described above) since timing and amount of future costs are currently estimated. |
|
(2) |
|
Holders may require us to repurchase the 4.50% Notes for cash on April 1, 2011, April 1, 2014
and April 1, 2019; or in certain circumstances involving a designated event, as defined in the
indenture for the 4.50% Notes. |
Long-term debt obligations represent:
|
|
|
$111 community development district obligations associated with Sterling Hill in
Hernando County, Florida, payable by 2010 |
|
|
|
|
$64,804 outstanding under the 4.50% Convertible Senior Notes due 2024; however,
holders may require us to repurchase the 4.50% Notes for cash on April 1, 2011, April 1,
2014 and April 1, 2019, or in certain
circumstances involving a designated event, as defined in the indenture for the 4.50%
Notes |
|
|
|
|
$55,881 outstanding under the Amended Unsecured Credit Facility due 2010 |
Purchase obligations (residential development) represent purchase commitments of $926 as of
December 31, 2009 for land development and construction expenditures, substantially for
homebuilding operations which relate to contracts for services, materials and supplies, which
obligations generally relate to corresponding contracts for sales of homes. Compensation
obligations represent compensation to executives pursuant to employment contracts.
Other long-term contractual obligations represent the estimated cost-to-complete of certain
utilities improvements in areas within Poinciana and Rio Rico where homesites have been sold.
52
|
|
|
Item 7. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(dollars in thousands except per share data) continued |
EFFECTS OF INFLATION AND ECONOMIC CONDITIONS
Our operations have been negatively affected by general economic conditions. Reduction in real
estate value, adverse changes in employment levels, consumer income and confidence, available
financing and interest rates may continue to result in fewer sales and/or lower sales prices. Other
economic conditions could affect operations (see Risk Factors).
The weakening of the residential real estate market has negatively impacted the homebuilding
industry. Since 2008, the market for homes in the geographic areas in which our developments are
located was severely and negatively impacted by the dislocations in the financial markets and the
collapse or near collapse of major financial institutions. Unemployment has increased
significantly and consumer confidence has continued to erode. We have experienced a significant
increase in the number of homes for sale or available for purchase or rent through foreclosures or
otherwise. The price points at which these homes are available have put further downward pressure
on our margins.
The housing market in the geographic areas in which our developments are located continues to
be compromised by an oversupply of alternatives to new homes, including rental properties and
investment homes available for sale, foreclosures, and homes being sold by lenders. We have
experienced a significant decline in demand for new homes in our markets, resulting in difficulty
in selling new homes at a profit. We continue to manage our housing inventory levels through
curtailing land development, reducing home starts and reducing selling prices to enable us to
deliver completed homes.
|
|
|
Item 7A. |
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk |
Avatar is subject to market risk associated with changes in interest rates and the cyclical
nature of the real estate industry. A majority of the purchasers of our homes finance their
purchases through third-party lenders providing mortgage financing or, to some extent, rely upon
investment income. In general, housing demand is dependent on home equity, consumer savings,
employment and income levels and third-party financing and is adversely affected by increases in
interest rates, unavailability of mortgage financing, increasing housing costs and unemployment
levels. The amount or value of discretionary income and savings, including retirement assets,
available to home purchasers can be affected by a decline in the capital markets. Fluctuations in
interest rates could adversely affect our real estate results of operations and liquidity because
of the negative impact on the housing industry. Real estate developers are subject to various
risks, many of which are outside their control, including real estate market conditions (both where
our communities and homebuilding operations are located and in areas where our potential customers
reside), changing demographic conditions, adverse weather conditions and natural disasters, such as
hurricanes, tornadoes and wildfires, delays in construction schedules, cost overruns, changes in
government regulations or requirements, increases in real estate taxes and other local government
fees, availability and cost of land, materials and labor, and access to financing. In addition,
Avatar is subject to market risk related to potential adverse changes in interest rates on the
Amended Unsecured Credit Facility. The interest rate for the Amended Unsecured Credit Facility
fluctuates with LIBOR lending rates, both upwards and downwards. See Notes H and Q (debt payout and
fair values) to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this Report.
(See Item 1A. Risk Factors for further discussion of risks.)
53
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
54
MANAGEMENTS REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over
financial reporting. Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including
our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we assessed the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting of Avatar Holdings Inc. and subsidiaries as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on the framework in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on that
assessment, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our internal
control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2009 to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting and the preparation of our financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting
principles.
Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, that audited the consolidated
financial statements of Avatar Holdings Inc. and subsidiaries included in this annual report, has
issued an attestation report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. The
attestation report follows this report.
55
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Avatar Holdings Inc.
We have audited Avatar Holdings Inc.s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,
2009, based on criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). Avatar
Holdings Inc.s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial
reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting
included in the accompanying Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on the companys internal control over financial reporting
based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was
maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal
control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and
evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk,
and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe
that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A
companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1)
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the
transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company;
and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized
acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or
detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are
subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that
the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, Avatar Holdings Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders equity, and cash flows for each of the
three years in the period ended December 31, 2009 of Avatar Holdings Inc. and subsidiaries and our
report dated March 16, 2010 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
|
|
|
Certified Public Accountants |
|
|
|
|
|
West Palm Beach, Florida
March 16, 2010
56
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Avatar Holdings Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Avatar Holdings Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2009. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the index at
Item 15(a)(2). These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Companys
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule
based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An
audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material
respects, the consolidated financial position of Avatar Holdings Inc. and subsidiaries at December
31, 2009 and 2008, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each
of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009, in conformity with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule,
when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in
all material respects the information set forth therein.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), Avatar Holdings Inc. and subsidiaries internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our
report dated March 16, 2010 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
|
|
|
Certified Public Accountants |
|
|
|
|
|
West Palm Beach, Florida
March 16, 2010
57
AVATAR HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
217,132 |
|
|
$ |
175,396 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
699 |
|
|
|
1,614 |
|
Receivables, net |
|
|
6,656 |
|
|
|
3,144 |
|
Income tax receivable |
|
|
35,018 |
|
|
|
21,503 |
|
Land and other inventories |
|
|
264,236 |
|
|
|
304,071 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
48,010 |
|
|
|
53,485 |
|
Poinciana Parkway |
|
|
8,482 |
|
|
|
16,168 |
|
Investment in and notes receivable from unconsolidated entities |
|
|
5,321 |
|
|
|
5,790 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
9,165 |
|
|
|
10,806 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,835 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
594,719 |
|
|
$ |
594,812 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
2,014 |
|
|
$ |
1,484 |
|
Accrued and other liabilities |
|
|
5,293 |
|
|
|
8,677 |
|
Customer deposits and deferred revenues |
|
|
2,874 |
|
|
|
3,611 |
|
Estimated development liability for sold land |
|
|
20,417 |
|
|
|
20,468 |
|
Notes, mortgage notes and other debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
63,010 |
|
|
|
74,950 |
|
Real estate |
|
|
55,992 |
|
|
|
56,111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities |
|
|
149,600 |
|
|
|
165,301 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock, par value $1 per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized: 50,000,000 shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued: 14,013,912 shares at December 31, 2009
11,488,259 shares at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
14,014 |
|
|
|
11,488 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
286,096 |
|
|
|
245,049 |
|
Non-controlling interest |
|
|
1,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
222,928 |
|
|
|
251,911 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
524,056 |
|
|
|
508,448 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock: at cost, 2,658,461 shares at December 31, 2009
and December 31, 2008 |
|
|
(78,937 |
) |
|
|
(78,937 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Stockholders Equity |
|
|
445,119 |
|
|
|
429,511 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
$ |
594,719 |
|
|
$ |
594,812 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
58
AVATAR HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Dollars in thousands except per-share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate revenues |
|
$ |
69,104 |
|
|
$ |
102,210 |
|
|
$ |
281,358 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
657 |
|
|
|
2,453 |
|
|
|
8,144 |
|
Other |
|
|
3,740 |
|
|
|
5,703 |
|
|
|
2,330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
73,501 |
|
|
|
110,366 |
|
|
|
291,832 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate expenses |
|
|
86,750 |
|
|
|
134,414 |
|
|
|
229,618 |
|
Impairment charges |
|
|
21,847 |
|
|
|
83,811 |
|
|
|
2,469 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
19,694 |
|
|
|
22,388 |
|
|
|
25,387 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
6,857 |
|
|
|
4,282 |
|
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
135,148 |
|
|
|
244,895 |
|
|
|
257,719 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity loss from unconsolidated entities |
|
|
(196 |
) |
|
|
(7,812 |
) |
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
(61,843 |
) |
|
|
(142,341 |
) |
|
|
34,053 |
|
Income tax benefit (expense) |
|
|
32,860 |
|
|
|
32,465 |
|
|
|
(13,056 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
($ |
28,983 |
) |
|
($ |
109,876 |
) |
|
$ |
20,997 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Share |
|
($ |
3.11 |
) |
|
($ |
12.85 |
) |
|
$ |
2.53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share |
|
($ |
3.11 |
) |
|
($ |
12.85 |
) |
|
$ |
2.22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
59
AVATAR HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Paid-in |
|
|
Non-Controlling |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Treasury Stock |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
Balance at January 1, 2007 |
|
|
10,725,559 |
|
|
$ |
10,726 |
|
|
$ |
237,051 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
340,790 |
|
|
|
(2,531,823 |
) |
|
|
($75,024 |
) |
Issuances from exercise of earnings
participation stock award |
|
|
308,448 |
|
|
|
308 |
|
|
|
(714 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuances from exercise of stock
options and restricted stock
units |
|
|
177,876 |
|
|
|
178 |
|
|
|
1,922 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares withheld for statutory
minimum withholding taxes
related to issuance of restricted
stock units and earnings
participation stock award |
|
|
(139,039 |
) |
|
|
(139 |
) |
|
|
(6,020 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit from exercise of
restricted stock units and
stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,094 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of restricted stock
units and stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,964 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other share based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion of 4.50% Notes |
|
|
3,800 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of 4.50% Notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(483 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,409 |
) |
|
|
(965 |
) |
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,997 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007 |
|
|
11,076,644 |
|
|
|
11,077 |
|
|
|
238,146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
361,787 |
|
|
|
(2,551,232 |
) |
|
|
(75,989 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuances from exercise of earnings
participation stock award |
|
|
4,566 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
212 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuances from exercise of stock
options and restricted stock
units |
|
|
164,170 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares withheld for statutory
minimum withholding taxes
related to issuance of restricted
stock units and earnings
participation stock award |
|
|
(52,021 |
) |
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
(1,435 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuances of restricted stock |
|
|
294,900 |
|
|
|
295 |
|
|
|
794 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of restricted stock
to satisfy employee
statutory minimum
withholding taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(107,229 |
) |
|
|
(2,948 |
) |
Tax benefit from exercise of
restricted stock units and
stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
920 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of restricted stock
units and stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,810 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of 4.50% Notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,215 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(109,876 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
11,488,259 |
|
|
$ |
11,488 |
|
|
$ |
245,049 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
251,911 |
|
|
|
(2,658,461 |
) |
|
|
($78,937 |
) |
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
60
AVATAR HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity continued
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Paid-in |
|
|
Non-Controlling |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Treasury Stock |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
Issuance of common stock |
|
|
2,514,391 |
|
|
$ |
2,515 |
|
|
$ |
39,782 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Issuances of restricted stock units
and stock units |
|
|
11,262 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit from exercise of
restricted stock units and
stock units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(830 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of restricted stock
units and stock units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,138 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of 4.50% Notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital contributions from
non-controlling interest
in unconsolidated entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28,983 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
14,013,912 |
|
|
$ |
14,014 |
|
|
$ |
286,096 |
|
|
$ |
1,018 |
|
|
$ |
222,928 |
|
|
|
(2,658,461 |
) |
|
|
($78,937 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are 10,000,000 authorized shares of $0.10 par value preferred stock, none of which are
issued.
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
61
AVATAR HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
($ |
28,983 |
) |
|
($ |
109,876 |
) |
|
$ |
20,997 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to
net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
5,246 |
|
|
|
6,758 |
|
|
|
6,425 |
|
Amortization of stock based compensation |
|
|
2,138 |
|
|
|
4,117 |
|
|
|
3,700 |
|
Impairment of goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,685 |
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of land and other inventories |
|
|
13,739 |
|
|
|
51,898 |
|
|
|
2,469 |
|
Impairment of Poinciana Parkway |
|
|
8,108 |
|
|
|
30,228 |
|
|
|
|
|
Gain from repurchase of 4.50% Notes |
|
|
(1,783 |
) |
|
|
(5,286 |
) |
|
|
(416 |
) |
Equity loss from unconsolidated entities |
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
7,812 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
Distributions (return) of earnings from an unconsolidated entity |
|
|
341 |
|
|
|
(292 |
) |
|
|
(178 |
) |
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
1,388 |
|
|
|
(10,962 |
) |
|
|
8,494 |
|
Excess income tax benefit from exercise of stock options and restricted stock units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(920 |
) |
|
|
(2,094 |
) |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
915 |
|
|
|
1,547 |
|
|
|
476 |
|
Receivables and income tax receivable |
|
|
(16,410 |
) |
|
|
(16,429 |
) |
|
|
6,594 |
|
Notes receivable from sale of land to an unconsolidated entity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,669 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Land and other inventories |
|
|
29,084 |
|
|
|
35,665 |
|
|
|
32,538 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
1,529 |
|
|
|
5,224 |
|
|
|
378 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued and other liabilities |
|
|
(2,964 |
) |
|
|
(5,188 |
) |
|
|
(36,404 |
) |
Customer deposits |
|
|
(737 |
) |
|
|
(1,305 |
) |
|
|
(13,435 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
11,807 |
|
|
|
(8,993 |
) |
|
|
29,604 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in property and equipment |
|
|
(131 |
) |
|
|
(803 |
) |
|
|
(8,318 |
) |
Investment in Poinciana Parkway |
|
|
(422 |
) |
|
|
(13,745 |
) |
|
|
(23,648 |
) |
Investment in unconsolidated entities |
|
|
(68 |
) |
|
|
(1,626 |
) |
|
|
(301 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
(621 |
) |
|
|
(16,174 |
) |
|
|
(32,267 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from Amended Unsecured Credit Facility |
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
2,100 |
|
Excess income tax benefit from exercise of restricted stock units and stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
920 |
|
|
|
2,094 |
|
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
|
42,296 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of 4.50% Notes |
|
|
(11,627 |
) |
|
|
(28,112 |
) |
|
|
(4,950 |
) |
Principal payments of real estate borrowings |
|
|
(119 |
) |
|
|
(15,855 |
) |
|
|
(959 |
) |
Payment of debt issuance costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(655 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(965 |
) |
Payment of withholding taxes related to restricted stock and units withheld |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,493 |
) |
|
|
(6,159 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
30,550 |
|
|
|
8,305 |
|
|
|
(8,839 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
|
41,736 |
|
|
|
(16,862 |
) |
|
|
(11,502 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
|
|
175,396 |
|
|
|
192,258 |
|
|
|
203,760 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF YEAR |
|
$ |
217,132 |
|
|
$ |
175,396 |
|
|
$ |
192,258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
62
AVATAR HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009
(Dollars in thousands except per-share data)
NOTE A SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
General
We are engaged in the business of real estate operations in Florida and Arizona. Our
residential community development activities have been adversely affected in both markets, bringing
development of our active adult and primary residential communities to their lowest level in
several years. We also engage in other real estate activities, such as the operation of amenities,
the sale for third-party development of commercial and industrial land and the operation of a title
insurance agency, which activities have also been adversely affected by economic conditions.
Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Avatar Holdings
Inc. and all subsidiaries, partnerships and entities in which Avatar Holdings Inc. (Avatar, we,
us or our) has a controlling interest. Our investments in unconsolidated entities in which we
have less than a controlling interest are accounted for using the equity method. All significant
intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
The preparation of our financial statements in conformity with United States generally
accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect
the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Accordingly, actual
results could differ from those reported.
Due to our normal operating cycle being in excess of one year, Avatar presents unclassified
consolidated balance sheets.
Certain 2008 and 2007 financial statement items have been reclassified to conform to the 2009
presentation.
Accounting Standards Codification
We adopted the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification
(ASC) 105-10, Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Overall (ASC 105-10). ASC 105-10
establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (the Codification) as the source of
authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental
entities in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP. Rules and
interpretive releases of the SEC under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of
authoritative U.S. GAAP for SEC registrants. All guidance contained in the Codification carries an
equal level of authority. The Codification superseded all existing non-SEC accounting and reporting
standards. All other non-grandfathered, non-SEC accounting literature not included in the
Codification is non-authoritative. The FASB will not issue new standards in the form of Statements,
FASB Staff Positions or Emerging Issues Task Force Abstracts. Instead, it will issue Accounting
Standards Updates (ASUs). The FASB will not consider ASUs as authoritative in their own right.
ASUs will serve only to update the Codification, provide background information about the guidance
and provide the bases for conclusions on the change(s) in the Codification. References made to FASB
guidance throughout this document have been updated for the Codification.
63
NOTE A SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES continued
Cash and Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash
We consider all highly liquid investments purchased with an initial maturity of three months
or less to be cash equivalents. We also consider closing proceeds from our house closings held by
our title insurance agency as cash equivalents which were $330 and $1,191 as of December 31, 2009
and 2008, respectively. As of December 31, 2009, our cash and cash equivalents were primarily
invested in money market accounts that invest in U.S. government securities. Due to the short
maturity period of the cash equivalents, the carrying amount of these instruments approximates
their fair values.
Restricted cash includes deposits of $699 and $1,614 as of December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. These balances are comprised primarily of housing deposits from customers that will
become available when the housing contracts close. We held escrow funds of $383 and $82 as of
December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, which are not considered assets of ours and, therefore,
are excluded from restricted cash in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Receivables, net
Receivables, net includes amounts in transit or due from title companies for house closings;
membership dues related to our amenity operations; and contracts and mortgage notes receivable from
the sale of land.
Income Tax Receivable
Income tax receivable consists of tax refunds we expect to receive within one year. As of
December 31, 2009 and 2008, there were $35,018 and $21,503, respectively, of income tax
receivables.
Land and Other Inventories
Land and Other Inventories are stated at cost unless the asset is determined to be impaired,
in which case the asset would be written down to its fair value. Land and Other Inventories
include expenditures for land acquisition, construction, land development and direct and allocated
costs. Land and Other Inventories owned and constructed by us also include interest cost
capitalized until development and construction are substantially completed. Land and development
costs, construction and direct and allocated costs are assigned to components of Land and Other
Inventories based on specific identification or other allocation methods based upon United States
generally accepted accounting principles.
In accordance with ASC 360-10, Property, Plant and Equipment (ASC 360-10) we review our Land
and Other Inventories for indicators of impairment.
For assets held and used, if indicators are present, we perform an impairment test in which
the asset is reviewed for impairment by comparing the estimated future undiscounted cash flows to
be generated by the asset to its carrying value. If such cash flows are less than the assets
carrying value, the carrying value is written down to its estimated fair value. Generally, fair
value is determined by discounting the estimated cash flows at a rate commensurate with the
inherent risks associated with the asset and related estimated cash flow streams. Assumptions and
estimates used in the determination of the estimated future cash flows are based on expectations of
future operations and economic conditions and certain factors described below. Changes to these
assumptions could significantly affect the estimates of future cash flows which could affect the
potential for future impairments. Due to the uncertainties of the estimation process, actual
results could differ significantly from such estimates.
For assets held for sale (such as completed speculative housing inventory), we perform an
impairment test in which the asset is reviewed for impairment by comparing the fair value
(estimated sales prices) less cost to sell the asset to its carrying value. If such fair value less
cost to sell is less than the assets carrying value, the carrying value is written down to its
estimated fair value less cost to sell.
64
NOTE A SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES continued
Land and Other Inventories continued
We evaluate our Land and Other Inventories for impairment on a quarterly basis. During 2009,
our impairment assessment resulted in impairment charges of $13,739, which included $1,820 relating
to homes completed or under construction and $11,919 related to land sold to LLCs which are
consolidated for financial statement purposes. Our evaluation of land developed and/or held for
future development or sale did not result in impairment charges during 2009. As of December 31,
2009, other than the Land and Other Inventories that we determined to be impaired and accordingly
wrote down to their carrying value, we had no long-lived assets that had undiscounted cash flows
within 25% of their carrying values.
The impairment charges for the fourth quarter of 2008 and for the year ended December 31, 2009
reflect market conditions, including a significant oversupply of homes available for sale, higher
foreclosure activity and significant competition. We have experienced difficulty in selling homes
at a profit causing us to reduce prices to monetize our inventory. Contribution margins are defined
as house sales prices less direct production costs (including the lot cost) as well as closing
costs and commissions. During the fourth quarter of 2008 and year ended December 31, 2009, most of
our sales contracts were signed at selling prices that have resulted or will result in losses upon
closing when factoring in operating costs such as sales and marketing and divisional overhead.
During the year ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, we recorded impairment charges of $1,820 and
$5,168, respectively, relating to homes completed or under construction. The following significant
trends were utilized in the evaluation of our land and other inventories for impairment:
|
|
|
The average price on sales closed from primary residential homebuilding operations
has decreased approximately 49% from $323 in fiscal year 2006 to $166 in fiscal year
2009. Our average sales price on sales contracts entered into during fiscal year 2009
declined to $157 compared to $242 during fiscal year 2008. Additionally, the average
contribution margin on closings from primary residential homebuilding operations has
declined from approximately 33% in fiscal year 2006 to approximately 6% during fiscal
year 2009. |
|
|
|
|
The average price on sales closed from active adult homebuilding operations has
decreased approximately 19% from $298 in fiscal year 2006 to $242 in fiscal year 2009.
Our average sales price on sales contracts entered into during fiscal year 2009 declined
to $211 compared to $232 during fiscal year 2008. Additionally, the average contribution
margin on closings from active adult homebuilding operations has declined from
approximately 32% in fiscal year 2006 to approximately 16% during fiscal year 2009. |
Land and Other Inventories that are subject to a review for indicators of impairment include
our: (i) housing communities (primary residential, including scattered lots, and active adult) and
(ii) land developed and/or held for future development or sale. A discussion of the factors that
impact our impairment assessment for these categories follows:
Housing communities: Activities include the development of active adult and primary
residential communities and the operation of amenities. The operating results and losses generated
from active adult and primary residential communities during the year ended December 31, 2009 and
2008 include operating expenses relating to the operation of the amenities in our communities as
well as divisional overhead not associated with specific communities.
Our active adult and primary residential communities are generally large master-planned
communities in Florida and in southeast Arizona. Several of these communities are long term
projects on land we have owned for many years. In reviewing each of our communities, we determine
if potential impairment indicators exist by reviewing actual contribution margins on homes closed
in recent months, projected contribution margins on homes in backlog, projected contribution
margins on speculative homes, average selling prices, sales activities and local market conditions.
If indicators are present, the asset is reviewed for impairment. In determining estimated future
cash flows for purposes of the impairment test, the estimated future cash flows are significantly
impacted by specific community factors such as: (i) sales absorption rates; (ii)
estimated sales prices and sales incentives; and (iii) estimated cost of home construction,
estimated land development costs, interest costs, indirect construction and overhead costs, and
selling and marketing costs. In addition, our estimated future cash flows are also impacted by
general economic and local market conditions, competition from other homebuilders, foreclosures and
depressed home sales in the areas in which we build and sell homes, product desirability in our
local markets and the buyers ability to obtain mortgage financing. Build-out of our
active adult and primary residential communities generally exceeds five years. Our current
assumptions are based on current activity and recent trends at our active adult and primary
residential communities. There are a significant
65
NOTE A SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES continued
Land and Other Inventories continued
number of assumptions with respect to each analysis. Many of these assumptions extend over a
significant number of years. The substantial number of variables to these assumptions could
significantly affect the potential for future impairments.
Declines in contribution margins below those realized from our current sales prices and
estimations could result in future impairment losses in one or more of our housing communities.
Land developed and/or held for future development or sale: Our land developed and/or
held for future development or sale represents land holdings for the potential development of
future active adult and/or primary residential communities. We anticipate these future communities
will be large master-planned communities similar to our current active adult and/or primary
residential communities. For land developed and/or held for future development or sale, indicators
of potential impairment include changes in use, changes in local market conditions, declines in the
selling prices of similar assets and increases in costs. If indicators are present, the asset is
reviewed for impairment. In determining estimated future cash flows for purposes of the impairment
test, the estimated future cash flows are significantly impacted by specific community factors such
as: (i) sales absorption rates; (ii) estimated sales prices and sales incentives; and (iii)
estimated costs of home construction, estimated land and land development costs, interest costs,
indirect construction and overhead costs, and selling and marketing costs. In addition, our
estimated future cash flows are also impacted by general economic and local market conditions,
competition from other homebuilders, foreclosures and depressed home sales in the areas where we
own land for future development, product desirability in our local markets and the buyers ability
to obtain mortgage financing. Factors that we consider in determining the appropriateness of moving
forward with land development or whether to write-off the related amounts capitalized include: our
current inventory levels, local market economic conditions, availability of adequate resources and
the estimated future net cash flows to be generated from the project. Build-out of our land held
for future development generally exceeds five years. There are a significant number of assumptions
with respect to each analysis. Many of these assumptions extend over a significant number of years.
The substantial number of variables to these assumptions could significantly affect the potential
for future impairments.
Declines in market values below those realized from our current sales prices and estimations
could result in future impairment.
66
NOTE A SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES continued
Property and Equipment
Property and Equipment are stated at cost and depreciation is computed by the straight-line
method over the following estimated useful lives of the assets: land improvements 10 to 25 years;
buildings and improvements 8 to 39 years; and machinery, equipment and fixtures 3 to 7 years.
Maintenance and operating expenses of equipment utilized in the development of land are capitalized
as land inventory cost. Repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred.
Property and Equipment includes the cost of amenities owned by us. The cost of amenities
includes expenditures for land acquisition, construction, land development and direct and allocated
costs. Property and Equipment owned and constructed by us also includes interest cost incurred
during development and construction.
Each reporting period, we review our Property and Equipment for indicators of impairment in
accordance with ASC 360-10. For our amenities, which are located within our housing communities,
indicators of potential impairment are similar to those of our housing communities (described
above) as these factors may impact our ability to generate revenues at our amenities or cause
construction costs to increase. In addition, we factor in the collectibility and potential
delinquency of the fees due for our amenities. During 2009, we recorded an impairment expense of
approximately $2,100 related to the amenities at Terralargo due to the sale to an LLC which we
consolidate. As of December 31, 2008 no impairments existed for Property and Equipment.
Poinciana Parkway
Poinciana Parkway includes expenditures for right-of-way acquisition, development,
construction and direct and allocated costs. Poinciana Parkway also includes interest cost incurred
during development and construction.
For the Poinciana Parkway, indicators of impairment are general economic conditions, rate of
population growth and estimated change in traffic levels. If indicators are present, the asset is
reviewed for impairment as described above. In determining estimated future cash flows for
purposes of the impairment test, we incorporate current market assumptions based on general
economic conditions such as anticipated estimated revenues and estimated costs. These assumptions
can significantly affect our estimates of future cash flows.
We review the recoverability of the carrying value of the Poinciana Parkway on a quarterly
basis in accordance with authoritative accounting guidance. Based on our reviews during 2009, we
determined the estimated future undiscounted cash flows of the Poinciana Parkway were less than its
carrying value. During 2009, we recognized impairment losses of $8,108. In addition,
non-capitalizable expenditures of $341 related to the Poinciana Parkway were expensed during 2009.
Goodwill and Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets
Prior to January 1, 2009, we performed annual impairment testing of our goodwill and other
intangible assets in accordance with ASC 350. During the fourth quarter of 2008, the market for
homes in the geographic areas in which our developments are located was severely and negatively
impacted by the dislocations in the financial markets and the collapse or near collapse of major
financial institutions. During 2008, we recorded an impairment charge of $1,685 relating to the
goodwill associated with our active adult community reporting unit, which represented our only
goodwill.
67
NOTE A SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES continued
Revenues
In accordance with ASC 360, revenues from the sales of housing units are recognized when the
sales are closed and title passes to the purchasers. In addition, revenues from commercial,
industrial and other land sales are recognized in full at closing, provided the purchasers initial
and continuing investment is adequate, all financing is considered collectible and there is no
significant continuing involvement.
Advertising Costs
Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. For the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and
2007, advertising costs totaled $725, $1,330 and $3,562, respectively, and are included in Real
Estate Expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
Warranty Costs
Warranty reserves for houses are established to cover estimated costs for materials and labor
with regard to warranty-type claims to be incurred subsequent to the closing of a house. Reserves
are determined based on historical data and other relevant factors. We may have recourse against
subcontractors for claims relating to workmanship and materials. Warranty reserves are included in
Accrued and Other Liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets.
During the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, changes in the warranty reserve
consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Warranty reserve as of January 1 |
|
$ |
468 |
|
|
$ |
1,134 |
|
|
$ |
2,319 |
|
Estimated warranty expense |
|
|
633 |
|
|
|
711 |
|
|
|
2,178 |
|
Amounts charged against warranty reserve |
|
|
(643 |
) |
|
|
(1,377 |
) |
|
|
(3,363 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warranty reserve as of December 31 |
|
$ |
458 |
|
|
$ |
468 |
|
|
$ |
1,134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Taxes
Income taxes have been provided using the liability method under ASC 740, Income Taxes (ASC
740). The liability method is used in accounting for income taxes where deferred income tax
assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between financial reporting and tax
basis of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that are
expected to be in effect when the differences reverse.
On November 6, 2009, the Worker, Homeownership, and Business Assistance Act of 2009 was
enacted into law and amended Section 172 of the Internal Revenue Code to extend the permitted
carryback period for offsetting certain net operating losses (NOLs) against earnings to up to
five years. Due to this recently enacted federal tax legislation, Avatar intends to carry back and
apply its 2009 NOL against earnings it generated in 2005. As a result, Avatar intends to file an
application for a federal tax refund of $34,248 which is included in income tax receivable on our
consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2009.
In accordance with ASC 740, Avatar evaluates its deferred tax assets quarterly to determine if
valuation allowances are required. ASC 740 requires that companies assess whether valuation
allowances should be established based on the consideration of all available evidence using a more
likely than not standard. During 2008, we established a valuation allowance against our deferred
tax assets. Based on our evaluation during the year ended December 31, 2008, we recorded an
additional valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets generated as a result of our net
loss during the year ended December 31, 2008. Our cumulative loss position over the evaluation
period and the uncertain and volatile market conditions provided significant evidence supporting
the need for a valuation allowance. During the first nine months of 2009, we recognized an increase
of $9,522 in the valuation allowance. However due to the new federal tax
legislation, we decreased the valuation allowance for the year ended December 31, 2009 by
$9,148. As of December 31, 2009, our deferred tax asset
valuation allowance was $10,419. In future
periods, the allowance could be reduced based on sufficient evidence indicating that it is more
likely than not that a portion of our deferred tax assets will be realized.
68
NOTE A SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES continued
Income Taxes continued
In 2006, we closed on substantially all of the land sold under the threat of condemnation, and
in 2007 we closed on the remainder. We believe these transactions entitled us to defer the payment
of income taxes of $24,355 from the gain on these sales. During October 2009, we received from the
Internal Revenue Service a final extension until December 31, 2010 to obtain replacement property
to defer the entire payment of income taxes. It is our intention to acquire replacement property by
December 31, 2010. It is possible that we may not identify and purchase adequate replacement
property within the required time period, which would require us to make this income tax payment
plus interest of approximately $7,000 as of December 31, 2010. We believe the tax planning strategy is
prudent and feasible, and we have the ability and intent to purchase and sell, if necessary,
replacement property to realize these deferred tax assets. On January 1, 2007, we adopted certain
provisions under ASC 740 which provides guidance in the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes
recognized in a companys financial statements. These provisions prescribe a recognition threshold
and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position
taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. In addition, these provisions also provide guidance
on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods,
disclosure, and transition. Based on our evaluation of tax positions, we have concluded that there
are no significant uncertain tax positions requiring recognition in our financial statements. Our
evaluation was performed for the tax years ended December 31, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008 which
remain subject to examination and adjustment by major tax jurisdictions as of December 31, 2009.
Any interest or penalties that have been assessed in the past have been minimal and immaterial
to our financial results. In the event we are assessed any interest or penalties in the future, we
plan to include them in our statement of operations as income tax expense.
Non-controlling Interest
Avatar has consolidated certain LLCs, which qualify as variable interest entities (VIEs)
because we determined that Avatar is the primary beneficiary. Therefore, the LLCs financial
statements are consolidated in Avatars consolidated financial statements and the other partners
equity in each of the LLCs is recorded as non-controlling interest as a component of consolidated
stockholders equity. At December 31, 2009, non-controlling interest was $1,018.
Common Stock Offering
In August 2009, we filed a shelf registration statement on Form S-3 for $500,000 of debt and
equity securities, which was supplemented in September 2009 by a supplemental prospectus for a
public offering of shares of our Common Stock, underwritten by Barclays Capital Inc. (the
Underwriter). We agreed to sell to the Underwriter 2,250,000 shares of our Common Stock, which
were offered to the public at a price of $18.00 per share and discounted to the Underwriter to a
price of $17.10 per share. The Underwriter was granted an over-allotment option to purchase up to
an additional 337,500 shares of Common Stock, at the same offering price to the public and subject
to the same underwriting discount. The closing on the sale of the 2,250,000 shares of Common Stock
occurred on September 28, 2009. Net proceeds to us before expenses were $38,475. On October 6,
2009, we closed on the sale of an additional 264,391 shares of our Common Stock pursuant to the
Underwriters partial exercise of its option to purchase additional shares, which option expired on
October 23, 2009. Net proceeds of the partial exercise of the option were $4,521, resulting in
total net proceeds of the offering, after approximately $700 of offering expenses, of approximately
$42,296. We intend to use the proceeds from the sale for general corporate purposes including,
without limitation, potential acquisitions of real estate and real estate-related assets.
69
NOTE A SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES continued
Share-Based Compensation
The Amended and Restated 1997 Incentive and Capital Accumulation Plan (2005 Restatement), as
amended (the Incentive Plan) provides for the grant of stock options, stock appreciation rights,
stock awards, performance awards, and stock units to officers, employees and directors of Avatar.
The exercise prices of stock options may not be less than the market value of our common stock on
the date of grant. Stock option awards under the Incentive Plan generally expire 10 years after
the date of grant.
As of December 31, 2009, an aggregate of 642,896 shares of our Common Stock, subject to
certain adjustments, were available for issuance under the Incentive Plan, including an aggregate
of 166,175 options and stock units granted. There were 476,721 shares available for grant at
December 31, 2009.
Cash flows resulting from tax benefits relating to tax deductions in excess of the
compensation expense recognized for those options (excess tax benefits) are classified and
reported as both an operating cash outflow and a financing cash inflow. For the years ended
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, we classified $0, $920 and $2,094, respectively, of excess tax
benefits as financing cash inflows.
Repurchase of Common Stock and Notes
On October 13, 2008, our Board of Directors amended its June 2005 authorization to purchase
the 4.50% Notes and/or common stock to allow expenditures up to $30,000, including the $9,864
previously authorized. On October 17, 2008, we repurchased $35,920 principal amount of the 4.50%
Notes for approximately $28,112 including accrued interest. On December 12, 2008, our Board of
Directors amended its June 2005 authorization to purchase the 4.50% Notes and/or common stock to
allow expenditures up to $30,000, including the $1,888 remaining after the October 2008 activities.
On March 30, 2009, we repurchased $7,500 principal amount of the 4.50% Notes for approximately
$6,038 including accrued interest. On June 19, 2009, we repurchased $6,576 principal amount of the
4.50% Notes for approximately $5,658 including accrued interest. As of December 31, 2009, the
remaining authorization is $18,304.
Earnings (Loss) Per Share
We present loss per share in accordance with ASC 260, Earnings Per Share. Basic earnings
(loss) per share is computed by dividing earnings available to common shareholders by the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share
reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common
stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock
that then shared in the earnings of Avatar. In accordance with ASC 260, the computation of diluted
earnings (loss) per share for 2009 and 2008 did not assume the effect of restricted stock units,
employee stock options or the 4.50% Notes because the effects were antidilutive.
The weighted average number of shares outstanding in calculating basic earnings per share
includes the issuance of 2,585,329, 116,715 and 351,085 shares of our common stock for 2009, 2008
and 2007, respectively, due to the equity offering described above, exercise of stock options,
conversion of restricted stock units, stock units and conversion of 4.50% Notes. Excluded from the
weighted average number of shares outstanding for 2009 and 2008 are 127,995 and 187,671,
respectively, restricted shares issued during 2008 that are subject to vesting requirements (see
Note L). In accordance with ASC 260, nonvested shares are not included in basic earnings per share
until the vesting requirements are met.
70
NOTE A SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES continued
Earnings (Loss) Per Share continued
The following table represents a reconciliation of the net income (loss) and weighted
average shares outstanding for the calculation of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share for
the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic (loss)/earnings per share net (loss)/income |
|
|
($28,983 |
) |
|
|
($109,876 |
) |
|
$ |
20,997 |
|
Interest expense on 4.50% Notes, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted (loss)/earnings per share net (loss)/income |
|
|
($28,983 |
) |
|
|
($109,876 |
) |
|
$ |
24,631 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
9,306,442 |
|
|
|
8,553,433 |
|
|
|
8,305,858 |
|
Effect of dilutive restricted stock units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
483,091 |
|
Effect of dilutive employee stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,348 |
|
Effect of dilutive 4.50% Notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,267,861 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
9,306,442 |
|
|
|
8,553,433 |
|
|
|
11,080,158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
Effective January 1, 2009, we adopted FASB ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations (ASC 805).
ASC 805 establishes principles and requirements for recognizing and measuring identifiable assets
and goodwill acquired, liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree. It
also provides disclosure requirements to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the
nature and financial effects of the business combination. The adoption of this topic did not have
an impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows as no
business acquisitions have been consummated after January 1, 2009.
Effective April 1, 2009, we adopted FASB ASC 855-10, Subsequent Events Overall (ASC
855-10). ASC 855-10 establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that
occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to
be issued. It requires the disclosure of the date through which an entity has evaluated subsequent
events and the basis for that date that is, whether that date represents the date the financial
statements were issued or were available to be issued. This disclosure should alert users of
financial statements that an entity has not evaluated subsequent events after that date in the set
of financial statements being presented. Adoption of ASC 855-10 did not have a material impact on
our consolidated results of operations or financial condition.
In April 2009, the FASB issued ASC 320-10-65, Investments Debt and Equity Securities
Overall Transition and Open Effective Date Information (ASC 320-10-65). ASC 320-10-65 amends
the other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) guidance in U.S. GAAP to make the guidance more
operational and to improve the presentation of other-than-temporary impairments in the financial
statements. The adoption of ASC 320-10-65 was effective June 30, 2009 for us, which did not have a
material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In June 2008, the FASB issued ASC 260-10-45-61A, Determining Whether Instruments Granted in
Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities (ASC 260-10-45-61A). Under ASC
260-10-45-61A, unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends
or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and shall be included
in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class
method. This guidance was effective for us on January 1, 2009, which did not have an impact on
our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows as our unvested
share-based awards do not contain rights to receive non-forfeitable dividends.
71
NOTE A SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES continued
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements continued
In June 2009, the FASB issued ASC 810, Consolidation (ASC 810). This guidance requires an
enterprise to determine whether its variable interest or interests give it a controlling financial
interest in a variable interest entity. The primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity is
the enterprise that has both (1) the power to direct the activities of a variable interest entity
that most significantly impact the entitys economic performance and (2) the obligation to absorb
losses of the entity that could potentially be significant to the variable interest entity or the
right to receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the variable
interest entity. ASC 810 requires ongoing reassessments of whether an enterprise is the primary
beneficiary of a variable interest entity. ASC 810 is effective for all variable interest entities
and relationships with variable interest entities existing as of January 1, 2010. We are currently
evaluating the impact of adopting this standard on our consolidated financial position or results
of operations.
In December 2007, the FASB issued ASC 810-10-65, Transition and Open Effective Date
Information (ASC 810-10-65). This guidance establishes accounting and reporting standards
pertaining to ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent, the amount
of net income attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest, changes in a parents
ownership interest, and the valuation of any retained noncontrolling equity investment when a
subsidiary is deconsolidated. ASC 810-10-65 also establishes disclosure requirements that clearly
identify and distinguish between the interests of the parent and the interests of the
noncontrolling owners. ASC 810-10-65 was adopted on January 1, 2009, which did not have an impact
on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows as all our subsidiaries
are wholly-owned and there has been no deconsolidation of a subsidiary after January 1, 2009.
In August 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-5, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic
820) Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value (ASU 2009-5). This update provides clarification of
the fair value measurement of financial liabilities when a quoted price in an active market for an
identical liability (level 1 input of the valuation hierarchy) is not available. ASU 2009-5 was
effective in the fourth quarter of 2009 and did not have a material impact on our financial
statements or disclosures.
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Net income (loss) and comprehensive income (loss) are the same for the years ended December
31, 2009, 2008 and 2007.
NOTE B REAL ESTATE REVENUES
The components of real estate revenues are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Primary residential |
|
$ |
26,968 |
|
|
$ |
38,217 |
|
|
$ |
158,642 |
|
Active adult communities |
|
|
32,604 |
|
|
|
42,491 |
|
|
|
92,180 |
|
Commercial, industrial and other land sales |
|
|
8,825 |
|
|
|
20,165 |
|
|
|
27,476 |
|
Other real estate operations |
|
|
707 |
|
|
|
1,337 |
|
|
|
3,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total real estate revenues |
|
$ |
69,104 |
|
|
$ |
102,210 |
|
|
$ |
281,358 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During
the year ended December 31, 2009, we realized pre-tax losses of
$316 on revenues of
$8,825 from sales of commercial, industrial and other land. For the year ended December 31, 2009,
pre-tax profits from sales of commercial and industrial land were $4,405 on aggregate revenues of
$4,758. For the year ended December 31, 2009, pre-tax losses
from other land sales were $4,721 on
aggregate revenues of $4,067.
72
NOTE B REAL ESTATE REVENUES continued
On December 11, 2009, Frenchmans Yacht Club Developers, LLC (Frenchmans), a Florida
limited liability company in which our wholly-owned subsidiary, Avatar Properties Inc.
(Properties), is the sole member, sold its interest in the proposed development known as
Frenchmans Yacht Club to an unrelated third party for cash and a purchase money note of $4,208.
The amount of cash we received did not meet the criteria in authoritative accounting guidance to
record this sale under the full accrual method of profit recognition. As a result, this transaction
is accounted for under the cost recovery method. Under the cost recovery method, no profit is
recognized until cash payments by the buyer, including principal and interest on the purchase money
note due to us exceeds the cost of the property sold. In the Frenchmans transaction, since we sold
the property at a loss, in accordance with authoritative accounting guidance we recognized the loss
of approximately $3,800 in full. The note receivable was discounted by $1,291 to the fair value for
purposes of measuring the loss on this transaction. Additionally, future interest cash receipts
will be recorded as deferred income, and presented as a reduction to the note receivable until such
time that the cumulative cash payments by the buyer exceed Avatars book value in the property at
the time of sale.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, pre-tax profits (loss) from sales of commercial,
industrial and other land were ($10,154) on revenues of $20,165. For the year ended December 31,
2008, pre-tax profits from commercial and industrial land were $4,916 on aggregate revenues of
$5,785. Pre-tax profits (loss) on sales of other land during the year ended December 31, 2008 were
($20,958) on aggregate revenues of $8,380. During 2008, we closed on the sale of the stock of one
of our wholly-owned subsidiaries, the sole asset of which was land leased to a third-party that
historically generated revenues to Avatar of approximately $600 per annum. Therefore, this sale is
classified for financial statement purposes as a sale of other land. Pre-tax profits on the sale
were $5,888 on revenues of $6,000.
The pre-tax loss from other land sales during 2008 was primarily attributable to the following
transactions as a result of our decision to sell certain land. More specifically, in this period,
we entered into two transactions with unaffiliated third parties providing for the formation of
LLCs; and we subsequently sold developed and partially-developed land to each of the newly formed
LLCs which were not required to be consolidated under authoritative accounting guidance. We
acquired a minority ownership interest in each of the LLCs and share in the management of each of
the LLCs. These transactions generated aggregate sales proceeds to Avatar of approximately $7,847
on assets with an aggregate book value of approximately $29,334. We invested approximately $1,626
to acquire equity interests in these LLCs. These transactions generated a pre-tax loss of
approximately $21,487. For the year ended December 31, 2007, pre-tax profits from commercial and
industrial land were $19,939 on aggregate revenues of $23,577. Pre-tax profits on sales of other
land during the year ended December 31, 2007 were $1,931 on aggregate revenues of $3,899.
For the year ended December 31, 2007, pre-tax profits from commercial
and industrial land were $19,939 an aggregate revenues of $23,577. Pre-tax profits on sales of other land during the year ended December 31, 2007 were $1,931 on aggregate
revenues of $3,899.
See Financial Information Relating to Industry Segments in Note P.
73
NOTE C LAND AND OTHER INVENTORIES
Land and other inventories consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Land developed and in process of development |
|
$ |
136,578 |
|
|
$ |
153,368 |
|
Land held for future development or sale |
|
|
98,818 |
|
|
|
96,054 |
|
Homes completed or under construction |
|
|
27,971 |
|
|
|
53,947 |
|
Other |
|
|
869 |
|
|
|
702 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
264,236 |
|
|
$ |
304,071 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On September 24, 2009, we acquired 87 completed and partially completed homes, 267 developed
lots, 364 partially developed lots and approximately 400 undeveloped master planned lots in a
residential community located in St. Lucie County, Florida. The purchase price was approximately
$7,450. We are completing construction of substantially and partially completed homes in this
community at an approximate cost of $1,200 of which $400 will be spent replacing Chinese drywall
that was placed in such homes by the original builder. In addition, on December 3, 2009, we
acquired 86 developed lots located in Pima County, Arizona. The purchase price was approximately
$3,725.
NOTE D PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Property and equipment and accumulated depreciation consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Land and improvements |
|
$ |
25,772 |
|
|
$ |
26,139 |
|
Buildings and improvements |
|
|
38,695 |
|
|
|
40,373 |
|
Machinery, equipment and fixtures |
|
|
13,551 |
|
|
|
13,696 |
|
Amenities construction in progress |
|
|
1,037 |
|
|
|
1,433 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79,055 |
|
|
|
81,641 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(31,045 |
) |
|
|
(28,156 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
48,010 |
|
|
$ |
53,485 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amenities owned by Avatar and which are not held for future transfer to homeowners
associations are included in property and equipment. The book values of these amenities (excluding
amenities construction in progress) were $45,813 and $50,816 as of December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
Depreciation charged to operations during 2009, 2008 and 2007 was $3,462, $3,820 and $3,427,
respectively.
74
NOTE E POINCIANA PARKWAY
In December 2006, we entered into agreements with Osceola County, Florida and Polk County,
Florida for us to develop and construct at our cost a 9.66 mile four-lane road in Osceola and Polk
Counties, to be known as the Poinciana Parkway (the Poinciana Parkway). The Poinciana Parkway is
to include a 4.15 mile segment to be operated as a toll road. We have acquired right-of-way and
federal and state environmental permits necessary to construct the Poinciana Parkway. In July 2008
and August 2008, we entered into amended and restated agreements with Osceola County and Polk
County, pursuant to which construction is to be commenced by February 14, 2011. Construction was to
be completed by December 31, 2011 subject to extension for Force Majeure. We have notified the
Counties that the completion date has been extended to October 14, 2013 due to Force Majeure
related to the economic downturn. We advised the Counties that the current economic downturn has
resulted in our inability to: (i) conclude negotiations with potential investors; or (ii)
obtain financing for the construction of the Poinciana Parkway.
If funding for the Poinciana Parkway is not obtained so that construction of the Poinciana
Parkway can be commenced by February 14, 2011 as required by our agreements with Osceola County and
Polk County, the Counties have no right to obtain damages or sue Avatar for specific performance.
Polk Countys sole remedy under its agreement with Avatar is to cancel such agreement if Avatar
does not construct the Poinciana Parkway. If the construction of the Parkway is not funded and
commenced by February 14, 2011, (i) a portion of Avatars land in Osceola County will become
subject to Osceola traffic concurrency requirements applicable generally to other home builders in
the County and (ii) Avatar will be required to contribute approximately $1,900 towards the
construction cost of certain traffic improvements in Osceola County that it otherwise might have
been obligated to build or fund if it had not agreed to construct the Poinciana Parkway. Avatar is
investigating the availability of an extension of the Poinciana Parkway permits and the related
deadlines in its agreements with the Counties.
Osceola County and Avatar were unsuccessful in their attempt to obtain a federal grant for
construction of the Parkway. Osceola County and Avatar are still attempting to obtain other
federal funds for development of the Poinciana Parkway, including tax appropriation and a federal
loan. We cannot predict whether any federal funds will be available.
For the Poinciana Parkway, indicators of impairment are general economic conditions, rate of
population growth and estimated change in traffic levels. If indicators are present, we perform an
impairment test in which the asset is reviewed for impairment by comparing the estimated future
undiscounted cash flows to be generated by the asset to its carrying value. If such cash flows are
less than the assets carrying value, the carrying value is written down to its estimated fair
value. In determining estimated future cash flows for purposes of the impairment test, we
incorporate current market assumptions based on general economic conditions such as anticipated
estimated revenues and estimated costs. These assumptions can significantly affect our estimates of
future cash flows.
Our estimate of the right-of-way acquisition, development and construction costs for the
Poinciana Parkway approximates $175,000 to $200,000. However, no assurance of the ultimate costs
can be given at this stage. As of December 31, 2009, approximately $47,000 has been expended.
During fiscal year 2008 we recorded impairment charges of $30,228, associated with the Poinciana
Parkway.
We review the recoverability of the carrying value of the Poinciana Parkway on a quarterly
basis in accordance with authoritative accounting guidance. Based on our reviews during 2009, we
determined the estimated future undiscounted cash flows of the Poinciana Parkway were less than its
carrying value. During 2009, we recognized impairment losses of $8,108. At December 31, 2009, the
carrying value of the Poinciana Parkway is $8,482. In addition, non-capitalizable expenditures of
$341 related to the Poinciana Parkway were expensed during 2009.
75
NOTE F ESTIMATED DEVELOPMENT LIABILITY FOR SOLD LAND
The estimated development liability consists primarily of utilities improvements in Poinciana
and Rio Rico for more than 8,000 homesites previously sold and is summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Gross unexpended costs |
|
$ |
26,389 |
|
|
$ |
26,518 |
|
Less costs relating to unsold homesites |
|
|
(5,972 |
) |
|
|
(6,050 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated development liability for sold land |
|
$ |
20,417 |
|
|
$ |
20,468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The estimated development liability for sold land is reduced by actual expenditures and is
evaluated and adjusted, as appropriate, to reflect managements estimate of anticipated costs. In
addition, we obtain third-party engineer evaluations and adjust this liability to reflect changes
in the estimated costs. We recorded charges of approximately $592, $710 and $386 during 2009, 2008
and 2007, respectively, associated with these obligations. Future increases or decreases of costs
for construction material and labor, as well as other land development and utilities infrastructure
costs, may have a significant effect on the estimated development liability.
NOTE G VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES
ASC 810, Consolidation (ASC 810), requires a variable interest entity (VIE) to be
consolidated in the financial statements of a company if that company is the primary beneficiary of
the VIE. Under ASC 810, the primary beneficiary of a VIE is the entity which absorbs a majority of
the VIEs expected losses, receives a majority of the VIEs expected residual returns, or both.
Entities determined to be VIEs, for which we are not the primary beneficiary, are accounted for
under the equity method.
We participate in entities with equity interests ranging from 20% to 50% for the purpose of
acquiring and/or developing land in which we may or may not have a controlling interest. These
entities are VIEs and our investments in these entities, along with other arrangements represent
variable interests, depending on the contractual terms of the arrangement. We analyze these
entities in accordance with ASC 810 when they are entered into or upon a reconsideration event.
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities
During 2009, Avatar entered into two separate agreements with unrelated third parties
providing for the formation of two separate limited liability companies (LLCs). We subsequently
sold developed, partially-developed and undeveloped land to each of the newly formed companies for
a combination of cash and purchase money notes. We acquired a minority ownership interest in each
of the LLCs and participate in the management of each of the LLCs. Avatar also entered into land
option contracts with these newly formed LLCs. Under such land option contracts, we paid a
specified option deposit in consideration for the right, but not the obligation, to purchase
developed lots in the future at predetermined prices.
In accordance with ASC 810, we determined that these entities qualify as variable interest
entities (VIEs) which requires consolidation by the entity determined to be the primary
beneficiary. The primary beneficiary is the entity determined to absorb the majority of the
VIEs expected losses, receives a majority of the VIEs expected residual returns, or both. As a
result of our analyses, Avatar holds a variable interest in the VIEs through the purchase money
notes, the land option contracts and an economic interest in these LLCs. As of December 31, 2009, our consolidated balance sheets include $4,386 in land and other inventories and $1,161 in
property and equipment from these LLCs.
76
NOTE G VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES continued
Unconsolidated Variable Interest Entities
We participate in entities with equity interests ranging from 20% to 50% for the purpose of
acquiring and/or developing land in which we do not have a controlling interest. We analyze these
entities in accordance with ASC 810 when they are entered into or upon a reconsideration event.
For entities determined to be VIEs, we are not the primary beneficiary if we do not absorb a
majority of the VIEs expected losses or receive a majority of the VIEs expected residual returns.
All of such entities in which we had an equity interest at December 31, 2009 and 2008 are accounted
for under the equity method.
Avatar shares in the profits and losses of these unconsolidated entities generally in
accordance with its ownership interests. Avatar and its equity partners make initial or ongoing
capital contributions to these unconsolidated entities on a pro rata basis. The obligation to make
capital contributions is governed by each unconsolidated entitys respective operating agreement.
During 2009 and 2008, we entered into various transactions with unaffiliated third parties
providing for the formation of LLCs; and we subsequently sold developed and partially-developed
land to each of the newly-formed LLCs. We acquired a minority ownership interest in each of the
LLCs and share in the management of each of the LLCs. Avatar made contributions totaling $42 and
$1,626 to its unconsolidated entities in 2009 and 2008, respectively.
As of December 31, 2009, these unconsolidated entities were financed by partner equity and do
not have third-party debt. In addition, we have not provided any guarantees to these entities or
our equity partners.
The following are the consolidated condensed balance sheets of our unconsolidated entities as
of December 31, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
$ |
243 |
|
|
$ |
645 |
|
Receivables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
Land and other inventory |
|
|
11,573 |
|
|
|
10,686 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
11,841 |
|
|
$ |
12,831 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Partners Capital: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
893 |
|
|
$ |
731 |
|
Notes and interest payable to Avatar |
|
|
3,724 |
|
|
|
3,669 |
|
Partners Capital of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Avatar |
|
|
1,597 |
|
|
|
2,121 |
|
Equity partner |
|
|
5,627 |
|
|
|
6,310 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and partners capital |
|
$ |
11,841 |
|
|
$ |
12,831 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following are the consolidated condensed statements of operations of our unconsolidated
entities for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
41 |
|
|
$ |
2,041 |
|
|
$ |
262 |
|
Costs and expenses |
|
|
607 |
|
|
|
17,571 |
|
|
|
392 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from unconsolidated entities |
|
($ |
566 |
) |
|
($ |
15,530 |
) |
|
($ |
130 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Avatars share of loss from unconsolidated entities |
|
($ |
196 |
) |
|
($ |
7,812 |
) |
|
($ |
60 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77
NOTE H NOTES, MORTGAGE NOTES AND OTHER DEBT
Notes, mortgage notes and other debt are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Corporate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.50% Convertible Senior Notes, due 2024 |
|
$ |
64,804 |
|
|
$ |
78,880 |
|
Unamortized discounts |
|
|
(1,794 |
) |
|
|
(3,930 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Carrying Amount |
|
$ |
63,010 |
|
|
$ |
74,950 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Component |
|
$ |
13,737 |
|
|
$ |
13,770 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.50% Term Bonds payable, due 2010 |
|
$ |
111 |
|
|
$ |
111 |
|
Amended Unsecured Credit Facility, due 2010 |
|
|
55,881 |
|
|
|
56,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
55,992 |
|
|
$ |
56,111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate:
On March 30, 2004, we issued $120,000 aggregate principal amount of 4.50% Convertible Senior
Notes due 2024 (the 4.50% Notes) in a private offering. Interest is payable semiannually on April 1
and October 1. The 4.50% Notes are senior, unsecured obligations and rank equal in right of payment
to all of our existing and future unsecured and senior indebtedness. However, the 4.50% Notes are
effectively subordinated to all of our existing and future secured debt to the extent of the
collateral securing such indebtedness, and to all existing and future liabilities of our
subsidiaries.
Each $1 in principal amount of the 4.50% Notes is convertible, at the option of the holder, at
a conversion price of $52.63, or 19.0006 shares of our common stock, upon the satisfaction of one
of the following conditions: a) during any calendar quarter (but only during such calendar quarter)
commencing after June 30, 2004 if the closing sale price of our common stock for at least 20
trading days in a period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of the
preceding calendar quarter is more than 120% of the conversion price per share of common stock on
such last day; or b) during the five business day period after any five-consecutive-trading-day
period in which the trading price per $1 principal amount of the 4.50% Notes for each day of that
period was less than 98% of the product of the closing sale price for our common stock for each day
of that period and the number of shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of $1 principal
amount of the 4.50% Notes, provided that if on the date of any such conversion that is on or after
April 1, 2019, the closing sale price of Avatars common stock is greater than the conversion
price, then holders will receive, in lieu of common stock based on the conversion price, cash or
common stock or a combination thereof, at our option, with a value equal to the principal amount of
the 4.50% Notes plus accrued and unpaid interest, as of the conversion date. The closing price of
Avatars common stock exceeded 120% ($63.156) of the conversion price for 20 trading days out of 30
consecutive trading days as of the last trading day of the fourth quarter of 2006, as of the last
trading day of the first quarter of 2007 and as of the last trading day of the second quarter of
2007. Therefore, the 4.50% Notes became convertible for the quarter beginning January 1, 2007, for
the quarter beginning April 1, 2007 and for the quarter beginning July 1, 2007. During 2008 and 2009, the
closing price of Avatars common stock did not exceed 120% ($63.156) of the conversion price for 20
trading days out of 30 consecutive trading days; therefore, the 4.50% Notes were not convertible
during 2008 and 2009. During 2007, $200 principal amount of
the 4.50% Notes were converted into 3,800 shares of Avatar common stock. During 2007, Avatar
repurchased $5,000 principal amount of the 4.50% Notes for approximately $4,984 including accrued interest. During 2008, we repurchased $35,920
principal amount of the 4.50% Notes for approximately $28,112 including accrued interest. On March
30, 2009, we repurchased $7,500 principal amount of the 4.50% Notes for approximately $6,038
including accrued interest. This repurchase resulted in a pre-tax gain of approximately $1,365
(which is included in Other Revenues in the consolidated statements of operations for the year
ended December 31, 2009). On June 19, 2009, we repurchased $6,576 principal amount of the 4.50%
Notes for approximately $5,658, including accrued interest. This repurchase resulted in a pre-tax
gain of approximately $418 (which is included in Other Revenues in
78
NOTE H NOTES, MORTGAGE NOTES AND OTHER DEBT continued
the consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2009). Following these
repurchases, $64,804 principal amount of the 4.50% Notes remain outstanding.
We may, at our option, redeem for cash all or a portion of the 4.50% Notes at any time on or
after April 5, 2011. Holders may require us to repurchase the 4.50% Notes for cash on April 1,
2011, April 1, 2014 and April 1, 2019; or in certain circumstances involving a designated event, as
defined in the indenture for the 4.50% Notes, holders may require us to purchase all or a portion
of their 4.50% Notes. In each case, we will pay a repurchase price equal to 100% of their
principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any.
The discount on the liability component of the 4.50% Notes is amortized using the effective
interest method based on an effective rate of 7.5%, which is the estimated market interest rate for
similar debt without a conversion option on the issuance date. The discount is amortized from the
issuance date in 2004 through April 1, 2011, the first date that holders of the 4.50% Notes can
require us to repurchase the 4.50% Notes. As of December 31, 2009, the remaining expected life over
which the unamortized discount will be recognized is 1.25 years. We recognized $1,549, $2,665 and
$1,136 in non-cash interest charges related to the amortization of the discount during the years
ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Real Estate:
In conjunction with the acquisition of developed land in Florida in September 2005 and
September 2004, we assumed approximately $5,900 of Community Development District term bond
obligations due 2010. These term bonds are secured by the land and bear an interest rate of 5.50%.
The outstanding balance as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 was $111.
On March 27, 2008, we entered into an Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, by and among our
wholly-owned subsidiary, Avatar Properties Inc., as borrower, Wachovia Bank, National Association
(as a lender and as administrative agent on behalf of the lenders), and certain financial
institutions as lenders (the Amended Unsecured Credit Facility). This agreement amended and
restated the Credit Agreement, dated as of September 20, 2005, as amended. The amendment was made
in anticipation of not meeting certain covenants and/or conditions in the Credit Agreement.
The principal changes effected by the Amended Unsecured Credit Facility included:
|
|
|
a reduction in the amount of the facility from $125,000 to $100,000 (the facility is
expandable up to $150,000, subject to certain conditions and lender approval); |
|
|
|
|
an approval for us to obtain financing for the Poinciana Parkway of up to $140,000,
subject to certain conditions; |
|
|
|
|
modifications to certain covenants including: (i) reducing the minimum adjusted
EBITDA/Debt Service ratio (as defined) from 2.75 to 2.0, and providing for an
alternative requirement of maintaining a maximum leverage ratio and minimum liquidity
level if the minimum adjusted EBITDA/Debt Service ratio cannot be maintained; (ii)
reducing the Leverage Ratio (as defined) from 2.0 to 1.75, and allowing us to net
unrestricted cash in excess of $35,000 against outstanding debt in determining total
liabilities; and (iii) amending our covenant regarding speculative homes and models
whereby if we maintain a Leverage Ratio (as defined) of 1.0 or less, we have no
financial covenant as to the number of speculative homes and models we can maintain;
however, if our Leverage Ratio exceeds 1.0, the number of speculative homes and models
cannot exceed 35% of unit closings for the trailing twelve month period; and |
|
|
|
|
an increased pricing of the facility as follows: (i) the LIBOR Margin is increased
from a range of 1.75% to 2.25% to a range of 2.0% to 2.75%, and depending on our
EBITDA/Debt Service ratio, our rate on outstanding borrowings could be increased up to
an additional 50 basis points; (ii) our fee for outstanding letters of credit increased
from 1% to 50 basis points below our LIBOR Margin; and (iii) our unused fee changed from
25 basis points to a range of 25 basis points to 50 basis points, depending on our
usage. |
79
NOTE H NOTES, MORTGAGE NOTES AND OTHER DEBT continued
The Amended Unsecured Credit Facility includes a $50,000 sublimit for the issuance of standby
letters of credit. The maturity date of the Amended Unsecured Credit Facility remained unchanged,
as September 20, 2010. As of December 31, 2009, we had borrowings of approximately $55,881
outstanding under the Amended Unsecured Credit Facility and had letters of credit totaling $22,535
of which $21,053 were financial/maintenance letters of credit and $1,482 was a performance letter
of credit. Under the Amended Unsecured Credit Facility, performance letters of credit do not count
against our availability for borrowing. Our borrowing rate under the Amended Unsecured Credit Facility was 2.73% as
of December 31, 2009. Our availability is approximately $3,066 as of December 31, 2009.
Also on March 27, 2008, in connection with the Amended Unsecured Credit Facility, Avatar
Holdings Inc., as guarantor, entered into a Second Restated Guaranty Agreement with Wachovia Bank,
National Association (as administrative agent and lender), in favor of certain financial
institutions as lenders (Second Restated Guaranty Agreement). This agreement amended and restated
the Restated Guaranty Agreement, dated as of October 21, 2005. Payments of all amounts due under
the Amended Unsecured Credit Facility are guaranteed by Avatar Holdings Inc. pursuant to
the Second Restated Guaranty Agreement.
We are in preliminary discussions with the administrative agent for our unsecured credit
facility regarding an extension. Should we reach an agreement on an extension it is expected to
result in a reduction of our commitment to approximately $50,000 and higher costs for outstanding
borrowings and letters of credit. Further, we anticipate that the facility will be converted to a
secured facility and provide for a paydown of outstanding borrowings while we have cash exceeding a
specified level. These discussions are in preliminary stages, and there can be no assurance that
we will reach an agreement.
On November 7, 2008, Franklin Bank SSB (Franklin Bank), one of the participating financial
institutions in our amended unsecured credit facility, was closed by the Texas Department of
Savings and Mortgage Lending and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) was named
receiver. On January 13, 2010, we received notification from the FDIC that Franklin Bank is no
longer a participant in our amended unsecured credit facility. Franklin Bank was a 20% participant.
On July 23, 2009, Guaranty Bank, one of the participating financial institutions in our
amended unsecured credit facility, announced that it no longer believed it could raise sufficient
capital, therefore, it was not probable that they would be able to continue as a going concern.
Guaranty Bank is a 25% or $25,000 participant in our amended unsecured credit facility. On August
21, 2009, BBVA Compass acquired the banking operations of Guaranty Bank from the FDIC. BBVA Compass
acquired the assets and assumed the deposits and entered into a loss sharing arrangement with the
FDIC that covers all of the acquired loans. BBVA Compass/Guaranty Bank continues to participate in
our Amended Unsecured Credit Facility. The outstanding borrowings under our amended unsecured
credit facility include participation from BBVA Compass/Guaranty Bank in the amount of
approximately $17,877.
Under the terms of the Amended Unsecured Credit Facility, we are required, among other things,
to maintain a Minimum Tangible Net Worth (as defined) and certain financial covenant ratios. The
Minimum Tangible Net Worth is increased quarterly by 25% of positive net income for the most
recently ended fiscal quarter and 75% of the aggregate proceeds from any equity offerings during
the most recently ended fiscal quarter. There is no decrease when we have net losses.
80
NOTE H NOTES, MORTGAGE NOTES AND OTHER DEBT continued
Financial covenant ratios required under the Amended Unsecured Credit Facility consist of
maintaining at the end of each fiscal quarter a Leverage Ratio (as defined) of not more than 1.75
to 1, 1.50 to 1, 1.25 to 1, or 1.00 to 1; an Adjusted EBITDA/Debt Service Ratio (as defined) that
is equal to or greater than 2.00 to 1; and a Notes Coverage Ratio (as defined) that is greater than
or equal to 2.00 to 1.
If we do not meet the minimum required Adjusted EBITDA/Debt Service Ratio, we can
alternatively comply by maintaining a reduced maximum Leverage Ratio and a minimum ACFFO (Adjusted
Cash Flow from Operations, as defined) Ratio or Liquidity (as defined) requirement. The AFFCO Ratio
requirement is greater than or equal to 1.50 to 1. If we do not meet the minimum required Adjusted
EBITDA/Debt Service Ratio and ACFFO Ratio requirement, we can alternatively comply with a minimum
Liquidity requirement of $50,000 (of which $25,000 is cash) when the EBITDA/Debt Service Ratio is
greater than or equal to 1.00 to 1 and the Leverage Ratio is less than or equal to 1.25 to 1 or we
can alternatively comply with a minimum Liquidity requirement of $75,000 (of which $35,000 is cash)
when the EBITDA/Debt Service Ratio is less than 1.00 to 1 and the Leverage Ratio is less than or
equal to 1.00 to 1.
The Amended Unsecured Credit Facility also contains limitations on investments relating to
real estate related joint ventures; and restrictions on raw land, land under development and
developed lots. Investments relating to real estate related joint ventures cannot exceed 25% of
Tangible Net Worth (as defined). The net book value of raw land, land under development and
developed lots cannot exceed 150% of Tangible Net Worth.
As of December 31, 2009, we were in compliance with the covenants of the Amended Unsecured
Credit Facility.
Maturities of notes, mortgage notes and other debt at December 31, 2009 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate |
|
Real Estate |
|
Total |
2010 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
55,992 |
|
|
$ |
55,992 |
|
2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
64,804 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,804 |
(1) |
Less discount |
|
|
(1,794 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,794 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
63,010 |
|
|
$ |
55,992 |
|
|
$ |
119,002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Holders may require us to repurchase the 4.50% Notes for cash on April 1, 2011,
April 1, 2014 and April 1, 2019; or in certain
circumstances involving a designated event, as defined in the indenture for the 4.50%
Notes. |
The following table represents interest incurred, interest capitalized, and interest
expense for 2009, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Interest incurred |
|
$ |
7,191 |
|
|
$ |
8,742 |
|
|
$ |
10,222 |
|
Interest capitalized |
|
|
(334 |
) |
|
|
(4,460 |
) |
|
|
(9,977 |
) |
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
6,857 |
|
|
$ |
4,282 |
|
|
$ |
245 |
|
|
|
|
We made interest payments of $5,035, $5,759 and $6,672 for the years ended December 31, 2009,
2008 and 2007, respectively.
81
NOTE I EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
We have a defined contribution savings plan that covers substantially all employees. Under
this savings plan, we contribute to the plan based upon specified percentages of employees
voluntary contributions. Our contributions to the plan for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008
and 2007 were $0, $154 and $230, respectively. Our Board of Directors determined to not effect a
matching contribution during 2009.
NOTE J LEASE COMMITMENTS
We lease the majority of our administration and sales offices under operating leases that
expire at varying times through 2013. Rental expense for the years 2009, 2008 and 2007 was $1,390,
$1,542 and $1,997, respectively. Minimum rental commitments under non-cancelable operating leases
as of December 31, 2009 were as follows: 2010 $952; 2011 $894; 2012 $790; 2013 $775; 2014
$720; thereafter -$0.
NOTE K ACCRUED AND OTHER LIABILITIES
Accrued and other liabilities are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Property taxes and assessments |
|
$ |
1,205 |
|
|
$ |
358 |
|
Interest |
|
|
879 |
|
|
|
1,090 |
|
Accrued compensation |
|
|
876 |
|
|
|
1,783 |
|
Contract retention |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
202 |
|
Warranty reserve |
|
|
458 |
|
|
|
468 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,865 |
|
|
|
4,776 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,293 |
|
|
$ |
8,677 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82
NOTE L SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS AND OTHER EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The Amended and Restated 1997 Incentive and Capital Accumulation Plan (2005 Restatement), as
amended (the Incentive Plan) provides for the grant of stock options, stock appreciation rights,
stock awards, performance awards, and stock units to officers, employees and directors of Avatar.
The exercise prices of stock options may not be less than the market value of our common stock on
the date of grant. Stock option awards under the Incentive Plan generally expire 10 years after
the date of grant. As of December 31, 2009, an aggregate of 642,896 shares of our Common Stock,
subject to certain adjustments, were available for issuance under the Incentive Plan, including an
aggregate of 166,175 options and stock units granted. There were 476,721 shares available for grant
at December 31, 2009, including 107,229 shares, repurchased and reflected as treasury shares, upon
vesting of employee restricted stock in order to satisfy tax withholding.
During 2008, Avatar amended the performance conditioned restricted stock unit agreements,
previously granted to certain employees, which converted into an equal number of shares of
restricted common stock of Avatar. This modification resulted in $1,089 of share-based compensation
in accordance with ASC 718, Compensation Stock Compensation (ASC 718). Each employee made an
Internal Revenue Code Section 83(b) election (the Section 83(b) election) with respect to all the
shares of restricted stock; Avatar agreed to vest 107,229 shares of restricted stock having a value
approximately equal to the tax withholding amount required as a result of the Section 83(b)
election, at the minimum statutory withholding rates applicable to the employee, and such shares
were withheld by Avatar. Avatar then issued 187,671 shares of restricted stock during 2008. The
terms, conditions and restrictions of the restricted stock, including the vesting and forfeiture
provisions, under the amended agreements are otherwise substantially the same as those that were
applicable under the restricted stock unit agreements except that each employee, as an owner of
this restricted stock, generally has the rights of an Avatar common stockholder, including voting
and dividend rights (except that dividends on unvested shares of restricted stock generally are
forfeited unless such shares ultimately vest). During 2009, 59,676 shares vested. As of December
31, 2009, there are 127,995 shares of restricted stock that are considered legally outstanding but
are not considered outstanding for accounting purposes until the vesting conditions are satisfied
in accordance with ASC 718.
Compensation expense related to the stock option and restricted stock unit awards for the
years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 was $2,035, $3,905 and $3,964, respectively, of which
$0, $0 and $287, respectively, related to stock options and $2,035, $3,905 and $3,677,
respectively, related to restricted stock units. The total income tax benefit recognized in the
consolidated statements of operations for stock options and restricted stock units during the years
ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 was $0, $1,500 and $1,522, respectively, of which $0, $0 and
$110, respectively, related to stock options and $0, $1,500 and $1,412, respectively, related to
restricted stock units.
83
NOTE L SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS AND OTHER EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION continued
Cash received from stock options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and
2007 was $0, $500 and $2,100, respectively. The additional tax benefit related to the exercise of
stock options and restricted stock units during the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
was $0, $920 and $2,094, respectively, which is reflected as an increase to additional paid in
capital.
Under ASC 718, the fair value of awards of restricted stock and units which do not contain a
specified hurdle price condition is based on the market price of our common stock on the date of
grant. Under ASC 718, the fair value of restricted stock awards which contain a specified hurdle
price condition is estimated on the grant date using the Monte-Carlo option valuation model (like a
lattice model). Under ASC 718, the fair value of each stock option is estimated on the grant date
using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The valuation models require assumptions and
estimates to determine expected volatility, expected life, expected dividend yield and expected
risk-free interest rates. The expected volatility was determined using historical volatility of
our stock based on the contractual life of the award. The risk-free interest rate assumption was
based on the yield on zero-coupon U.S. Treasury strips at the award grant date. We also used
historical data to estimate forfeiture experience.
The significant weighted average assumptions used for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008
and 2007 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Dividend yield |
|
|
N/A |
* |
|
|
N/A |
* |
|
|
0 |
% |
Volatility rate |
|
|
N/A |
* |
|
|
N/A |
* |
|
|
27.0%-27.3 |
% |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
N/A |
* |
|
|
N/A |
* |
|
|
4.7%-5.0 |
% |
Expected life (years) |
|
|
N/A |
* |
|
|
N/A |
* |
|
|
3 |
|
Weighted average fair value of units granted |
|
$ |
17.44 |
|
|
$ |
35.54 |
|
|
$ |
73.09 |
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Not applicable since no stock options or restricted stock awards with specified hurdle
price condition as discussed above were granted during 2009 and 2008. |
A summary of the status of the stock option activity for the years ended December 31,
2009, 2008 and 2007 is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Options |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Options |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
Outstanding at beginning of year |
|
|
136,102 |
|
|
$ |
25.00 |
|
|
|
156,102 |
|
|
$ |
25.00 |
|
|
|
240,102 |
|
|
$ |
25.00 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
(20,000 |
) |
|
$ |
25.00 |
|
|
|
(84,000 |
) |
|
$ |
25.00 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(26,102 |
) |
|
$ |
25.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at end of period |
|
|
110,000 |
|
|
$ |
25.00 |
|
|
|
136,102 |
|
|
$ |
25.00 |
|
|
|
156,102 |
|
|
$ |
25.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at end of period |
|
|
110,000 |
|
|
$ |
25.00 |
|
|
|
136,102 |
|
|
$ |
25.00 |
|
|
|
156,102 |
|
|
$ |
25.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted average remaining contractual life of stock options outstanding as of December
31, 2009 was 3.2 years. The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the years
ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 was $0, $121 and $3,922, respectively.
84
NOTE L SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS AND OTHER EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION continued
A summary of the restricted stock and stock units activity for the year ended December 31,
2009 is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Restricted |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Stock and |
|
|
Grant Date |
|
|
|
Stock Units |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Outstanding at beginning of year |
|
|
236,436 |
|
|
$ |
32.63 |
|
Granted |
|
|
5,880 |
|
|
$ |
17.44 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(69,341 |
) |
|
$ |
40.73 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(700 |
) |
|
$ |
57.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at end of year |
|
|
172,275 |
(1) |
|
$ |
28.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes 127,995 shares restricted stock issued that are considered
legally outstanding but are not considered outstanding for accounting
purposes until the vesting conditions are satisfied in accordance with
authoritative accounting guidance. |
As of December 31, 2009, there was $920 of unrecognized compensation expense related to
unvested restricted stock units, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period
of 1.1 years. As of December 31, 2009, there was no unrecognized compensation expense related to
stock options.
Under a deferral program, non-management directors may elect to defer up to 50% of annual
retainer fees, committee fees and/or chairperson fees, for which the director is credited with a
number of stock units based upon the closing price of Avatars common stock on the due date of each
payment. The number of stock units become distributable as shares of common stock upon the earlier
of a date designated by the individual director or the date of the individuals separation from
service as a director. Stock units of 3,049, 0 and 1,372 shares were distributed to non-management
directors during the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The outstanding
balance of stock units as of December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 was 11,895, 9,429 and 4,617,
respectively.
NOTE M INCOME TAXES
The components of income tax expense (benefit) for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and
2007 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
($ |
34,248 |
) |
|
($ |
21,503 |
) |
|
$ |
3,663 |
|
State |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
612 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current |
|
|
(34,248 |
) |
|
|
(21,503 |
) |
|
|
4,275 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
|
1,189 |
|
|
|
(9,392 |
) |
|
|
7,523 |
|
State |
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
(1,570 |
) |
|
|
1,258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred |
|
|
1,388 |
|
|
|
(10,962 |
) |
|
|
8,781 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income tax expense (benefit) |
|
($ |
32,860 |
) |
|
($ |
32,465 |
) |
|
$ |
13,056 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85
NOTE M INCOME TAXES continued
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effect of temporary differences between the carrying
amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income
tax purposes. Significant components of deferred income tax assets and liabilities as of December
31, 2009 and 2008 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Deferred income tax assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax over book basis of land inventory |
|
$ |
12,586 |
|
|
$ |
11,751 |
|
Unrecoverable land development costs |
|
|
2,164 |
|
|
|
2,329 |
|
Executive incentive compensation |
|
|
937 |
|
|
|
1,103 |
|
Net operating loss carryforward |
|
|
5,416 |
|
|
|
2,089 |
|
Impairment charges |
|
|
15,304 |
|
|
|
31,675 |
|
Other |
|
|
923 |
|
|
|
1,526 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred income tax assets |
|
|
37,330 |
|
|
|
50,473 |
|
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets |
|
|
(10,419 |
) |
|
|
(19,567 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred income tax assets |
|
|
26,911 |
|
|
|
30,906 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax liability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book over tax income recognized on sale of the Ocala Property |
|
|
(24,355 |
) |
|
|
(24,355 |
) |
Tax over book on 4.50% Convertible Notes |
|
|
(1,522 |
) |
|
|
(3,027 |
) |
Book over tax basis of depreciable assets |
|
|
(762 |
) |
|
|
(689 |
) |
Restricted stock |
|
|
(272 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,911 |
) |
|
|
(28,071 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred income tax asset (liability) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,835 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On November 6, 2009, the Worker, Homeownership, and Business Assistance Act of 2009 was
enacted into law and amended Section 172 of the Internal Revenue Code to extend the permitted
carryback period for offsetting certain NOLs against earnings for up to five years. Due to this
recently enacted federal tax legislation, Avatar intends to carry back and offset its 2009 NOL
against earnings it generated in the five previous fiscal years. As a result, Avatar intents to
file application for a federal tax refund of $34,248 which is reflected as an income tax receivable
on our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2009.
In accordance with ASC 740, Avatar evaluates its deferred tax assets quarterly to determine if
valuation allowances are required. ASC 740 requires that companies assess whether valuation
allowances should be established based on the consideration of all available evidence using a more
likely than not standard. During 2008, we established a valuation allowance against our deferred
tax assets. Based on our evaluation during the year ended December 31, 2008, we recorded an
additional valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets generated as a result of our net
loss during the year ended December 31, 2008. Our cumulative loss position over the evaluation
period and the uncertain and volatile market conditions provided significant evidence supporting
the need for a valuation allowance. During the first nine months of 2009, we recognized an increase
of $9,522 in the valuation allowance. However due to the new federal tax legislation as discussed
above, we decreased the valuation allowance for the year ended
December 31, 2009 by $9,148. As of
December 31, 2009, our deferred tax asset valuation allowance
was $10,419. In future periods, the
allowance could be reduced based on sufficient evidence indicating that it is more likely than not
that a portion of our deferred tax assets will be realized.
In 2006, we closed on substantially all of the land sold under the threat of condemnation, and
in 2007 we closed on the remainder. We believe these transactions entitled us to defer the payment
of income taxes of $24,355 from the gain on these sales. During October 2009, we received from the
Internal Revenue Service a final extension until December 31, 2010 to obtain replacement property
to defer the entire payment of income taxes. It is our intention to acquire replacement property by
December 31, 2010. It is possible that we may not identify and purchase adequate replacement
property within the required time period, which would require us to make this income tax payment
plus interest as of December 31, 2010. We believe the tax planning strategy is prudent and
feasible, and we have the ability and intent to purchase and sell, if necessary, replacement
property to realize these deferred tax assets.
86
NOTE M INCOME TAXES continued
The exercise of restricted stock, restricted stock units and stock options during 2009, 2008
and 2007 generated additional income tax benefits of $0, $920 and $2,094, respectively, which is
reflected as an increase to additional paid-in capital.
A reconciliation of income tax expense (benefit) to the expected income tax expense (benefit)
at the federal statutory rate of 35% for each of the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Income tax (benefit) expense computed at statutory rate |
|
($ |
21,645 |
) |
|
($ |
49,819 |
) |
|
$ |
11,919 |
|
State income tax (benefit) expense, net of federal benefit |
|
|
(2,093 |
) |
|
|
(4,820 |
) |
|
|
1,158 |
|
Tax exempt interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(928 |
) |
Change in valuation allowance on deferred tax assets |
|
|
(9,148 |
) |
|
|
19,567 |
|
|
|
|
|
Reduction of valuation allowance due to adoption of ASC 470-20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,027 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
(420 |
) |
|
|
907 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax (benefit) expense |
|
($ |
32,860 |
) |
|
($ |
32,465 |
) |
|
$ |
13,056 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2009 and 2008, we received income tax payment refunds of approximately $21,356 and
$3,924, respectively, related to taxable losses generated during fiscal 2008 and over payment of
2007 taxes, respectively. During 2007, we made income tax payments of $22,850.
NOTE N COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
We are involved in various pending litigation matters primarily arising in the normal course
of our business. These cases are in various procedural stages. Although the outcome of these
matters cannot be determined, Avatar believes it is probable in accordance with ASC 450-20, Loss
Contingencies, that certain claims may result in costs and expenses estimated at approximately $334
and $1,600 which have been accrued in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of December
31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Liabilities or costs arising out of these and other currently
pending litigation should not have a material adverse effect on our business or consolidated
financial position or results of operations.
Performance bonds, issued by third party entities, are used primarily to guarantee our
performance to construct improvements in our various communities. As of December 31, 2009, we had
outstanding performance bonds of approximately $3,011. We do not believe that it is likely any of
these outstanding performance bonds will be drawn upon.
NOTE O OTHER MATTERS
At our communities of Solivita and Solivita West, tax-exempt bond financing is utilized to
fund and manage portions of public infrastructure consisting primarily of stormwater management
facilities, drainage works, irrigation facilities, and water and wastewater utilities. The bonds
were issued by the Poinciana Community Development District and Poinciana West Community
Development District (the CDDs), independent special-purpose units of county government,
established and operating in accordance with Chapter 190 of the Florida Statutes. The bonds are
serviced by non-ad valorem special assessments levied on certain developable and developed property
within Solivita and Solivita West, and the assessments constitute a liability against the
developable and developed property and are intended to secure the CDDs ability to meet bond
servicing obligations. In accordance with EITF 91-10, Accounting for Special Assessments and Tax
Increment Financing, we record and pay the assessments on parcels owned by Avatar when such assessments are fixed and determinable. The assessments are not a
liability of Avatar or any other landowner within the CDDs but are obligations secured by the land.
For the developable and developed parcels Avatar owns within the CDDs, Avatar pays the assessments
until such parcels are sold. After a sale by Avatar, Avatar no longer pays the assessments on the
parcel sold and any future assessments become the responsibility of the new owner and its
successors in title until the bonds are paid in full.
87
NOTE P FINANCIAL INFORMATION RELATING TO INDUSTRY SEGMENTS
In accordance with ASC 280, Segment Reporting (ASC 280), our current real estate operations
include the following segments: the development, sale and management of active adult communities;
the development and sale of primary residential communities; and the sale of commercial, industrial
or other land. In accordance with ASC 280, our homebuilding operations in Arizona and our title
insurance agency do not qualify as separate reportable segments and are included in Primary
Residential and Other Operations, respectively.
The following tables summarize our information for reportable segments for the years ended
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Primary residential |
|
$ |
26,968 |
|
|
$ |
38,217 |
|
|
$ |
158,642 |
|
Active adult communities |
|
|
32,604 |
|
|
|
42,491 |
|
|
|
92,180 |
|
Commercial and industrial and other land sales |
|
|
8,825 |
|
|
|
20,165 |
|
|
|
27,476 |
|
Other operations |
|
|
995 |
|
|
|
1,537 |
|
|
|
3,215 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,392 |
|
|
|
102,410 |
|
|
|
281,513 |
|
Unallocated revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
657 |
|
|
|
2,453 |
|
|
|
8,144 |
|
Gain on repurchase of 4.50% Notes |
|
|
1,783 |
|
|
|
5,286 |
|
|
|
416 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,669 |
|
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
1,759 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
73,501 |
|
|
$ |
110,366 |
|
|
$ |
291,832 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment operating income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Primary residential |
|
($ |
8,103 |
) |
|
($ |
43,133 |
) |
|
$ |
21,081 |
|
Active adult communities |
|
|
(5,613 |
) |
|
|
(6,725 |
) |
|
|
13,262 |
|
Commercial and industrial and other land sales |
|
|
(316 |
) |
|
|
(10,154 |
) |
|
|
21,870 |
|
Other operations |
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,821 |
) |
|
|
(60,005 |
) |
|
|
56,847 |
|
Unallocated income (expenses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
657 |
|
|
|
2,453 |
|
|
|
8,144 |
|
Gain on repurchase of 4.50% Notes |
|
|
1,783 |
|
|
|
5,286 |
|
|
|
416 |
|
Equity loss from unconsolidated entities |
|
|
(196 |
) |
|
|
(7,812 |
) |
|
|
(60 |
) |
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
(19,694 |
) |
|
|
(22,388 |
) |
|
|
(25,387 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
(6,857 |
) |
|
|
(4,282 |
) |
|
|
(245 |
) |
Other real estate expenses |
|
|
(3,688 |
) |
|
|
(8,424 |
) |
|
|
(5,662 |
) |
Impairment of the Poinciana Parkway |
|
|
(8,108 |
) |
|
|
(30,228 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Impairment of land developed or held for future development |
|
|
(11,919 |
) |
|
|
(16,941 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
($ |
61,843 |
) |
|
($ |
142,341 |
) |
|
$ |
34,053 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88
NOTE P FINANCIAL INFORMATION RELATING TO INDUSTRY SEGMENTS continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Primary residential |
|
$ |
96,965 |
|
|
$ |
178,284 |
|
Active adult communities |
|
|
118,883 |
|
|
|
134,462 |
|
Commercial and industrial and other land sales |
|
|
11,568 |
|
|
|
9,827 |
|
Poinciana Parkway |
|
|
8,482 |
|
|
|
16,168 |
|
Unallocated assets |
|
|
358,821 |
|
|
|
256,071 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
594,719 |
|
|
$ |
594,812 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Our businesses are primarily conducted in the United States. |
|
(b)
|
|
Identifiable assets by segment are those assets that are used in the operations of each
segment. |
|
(c)
|
|
No significant part of the business is dependent upon a single customer or group of
customers. |
|
(d)
|
|
Our homebuilding operations in Arizona and our title insurance agency do not qualify as
separate reportable segments and are included in Primary Residential and Other Operations,
respectively. |
|
(e)
|
|
The caption Unallocated assets under the table depicting the segment assets represents the
following as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively: cash, cash equivalents and
restricted cash of $215,514 and $171,299; land inventories of $92,370 and $47,984 (a majority
of which is bulk land); property and equipment of $2,188 and $433; investment in and notes
from unconsolidated entities of $5,321 and $5,790; receivables of
$41,492 and $24,165;
deferred income tax assets of $0 and $2,835 and prepaid expenses and other assets of $1,936
and $3,565. None of the foregoing are directly attributable to a reportable segment in
accordance with ASC 280. |
|
(f)
|
|
There is no interest expense from primary residential, active adult communities, and
commercial, industrial and other land sales included in segment operating income/(loss) for
2009, 2008 and 2007. |
|
(g)
|
|
Included in segment operating profit/(loss) for 2009 is depreciation expense of $859, $2,301
and $302 from primary residential, active adult communities and unallocated corporate/other,
respectively. Included in segment operating profit/(loss) for 2008 is depreciation expense of
$1,476, $2,315 and $29 from primary residential, active adult communities and unallocated
corporate/other, respectively. Included in segment operating income/(loss) for 2007 is
depreciation expense of $1,270, $2,113 and $44 from primary residential, active adult
communities, and unallocated corporate/other, respectively. |
|
(h)
|
|
During fiscal year 2009, impairment losses of approximately $1,449 and $371 reduced the
carrying value of the assets of primary residential and active adult communities,
respectively. In addition, impairment losses of approximately $8,108
and approximately $11,919
reduce the carrying values of Poinciana Parkway and land developed or held for future
development (which is currently not allocated to a reportable segment), respectively. During
fiscal year 2008, impairment losses of approximately $34,332 and $625 reduced the carrying
value of the assets of primary residential and active adult communities, respectively. In
addition, impairment losses of approximately $30,228 and approximately $16,941 reduce the
carrying values of Poinciana Parkway and land developed or held for future development (which
is currently not allocated to a reportable segment), respectively. |
|
(i)
|
|
Goodwill of $1,684 was determined to be impaired and written-off during 2008. |
89
NOTE Q FAIR VALUE DISCLOSURES
Effective January 1, 2008, we adopted FASB ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures
Overall (ASC 820) for our assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis. ASC
820-10 provides guidance for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities, defines fair
value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value under generally accepted accounting
principles, expands disclosures about fair value measurements, and establishes a fair value
hierarchy that requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of
unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. On January 1, 2009, we adopted ASC 820-10 for
nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in
the financial statements on a nonrecurring basis. The adoption in 2009 did not have a significant
impact on our financial statements.
Effective April 1, 2009, we adopted FASB ASC 820-10-65, Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures Overall Transition and Open Effective Date Information (ASC 820-10-65). ASC
820-10-65 provides guidelines for making fair value measurements more consistent with the
principles presented in ASC 820-10. This topic provides additional authoritative guidance in
determining whether a market is active or inactive, and whether a transaction is distressed; is
applicable to all assets and liabilities (i.e. financial and nonfinancial); and requires enhanced
disclosures. The adoption of ASC 820-10-65 was effective no later than periods ending after June
15, 2009. ASC 820-10-65 was effective June 30, 2009 for us, which did not have a material impact on
our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
The accounting standards require that assets and liabilities carried at fair value be
classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:
|
|
|
Level 1: Fair value determined based on quoted market prices in active markets for
identical assets and liabilities. |
|
|
|
|
Level 2: Fair value determined using significant observable inputs, such as quoted
prices for similar assets or liabilities or quoted prices for identical or similar
assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices
that are observable for the asset or liability, or inputs that are derived principally
from or corroborated by observable market data, by correlation or other means. |
|
|
|
|
Level 3: Fair value determined using significant unobservable inputs, such as
discounted cash flows, or similar techniques. |
The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, receivables and accounts payable approximates
the fair value due to their short-term maturities.
The majority of our non-financial instruments, which include land and other inventories,
Poinciana Parkway and property and equipment, are not required to be carried at fair value on a
recurring basis. However, if certain triggering events occur such that a non-financial instrument
is required to be evaluated for impairment, a resulting asset impairment would require that the
non-financial instrument be recorded at the lower of historical cost or its fair value.
90
NOTE Q FAIR VALUE DISCLOSURES continued
Avatars assets measured at fair value as of December 31, 2009 and losses for the year ended
December 31, 2009 on a nonrecurring basis are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Fair Value at |
|
|
|
|
Non-financial Assets |
|
Hierarchy |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
Losses |
|
Homes completed or under construction |
|
Level 2 |
|
$ |
25,195 |
|
|
$ |
1,820 |
|
Poinciana Parkway |
|
Level 3 |
|
$ |
8,482 |
|
|
$ |
8,108 |
|
In accordance with ASC 360-10, homes completed or under construction that were impaired with a
carrying amount of $27,015 were written down to their fair value of $25,195, resulting in
impairment charges of $1,820 for the year ended December 31, 2009.
For assets held for sale (such as homes completed or under construction), we perform an
impairment test in which the asset is reviewed for impairment by comparing the fair value
(estimated sales prices) less cost to sell the asset to its carrying value. If such fair value less
cost to sell is less than the assets carrying value, the carrying value is written down to its
estimated fair value less cost to sell.
The carrying amounts and fair values of our financial instruments at December 31, 2009 and
2008 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Value |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
217,132 |
|
|
$ |
217,132 |
|
|
$ |
175,396 |
|
|
$ |
175,396 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
$ |
699 |
|
|
$ |
699 |
|
|
$ |
1,614 |
|
|
$ |
1,614 |
|
Receivables, net |
|
$ |
6,656 |
|
|
$ |
6,656 |
|
|
$ |
3,144 |
|
|
$ |
3,144 |
|
Income tax receivable |
|
$ |
35,018 |
|
|
$ |
35,018 |
|
|
$ |
21,503 |
|
|
$ |
21,503 |
|
Notes, mortgage notes and other debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.50% Notes |
|
$ |
63,010 |
|
|
$ |
61,969 |
|
|
$ |
74,950 |
|
|
$ |
59,752 |
|
Real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.50% Term Bonds payable |
|
$ |
111 |
|
|
$ |
105 |
|
|
$ |
111 |
|
|
$ |
100 |
|
Amended Unsecured Credit Facility |
|
$ |
55,881 |
|
|
$ |
54,750 |
|
|
$ |
56,000 |
|
|
$ |
53,195 |
|
In estimating the fair value of financial instruments, we used the following methods and
assumptions:
Cash and cash equivalents and Restricted cash: The carrying amount reported in the consolidated
balance sheets for cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash approximates their fair value.
Receivables, net and Income tax receivable: The carrying amount reported in the consolidated
balance sheets for receivables, net and income tax receivable approximates their fair value.
4.50% Notes: At December 31, 2009 and 2008, the fair value of the 4.50% Notes is estimated, based
on quoted or estimated market prices.
Real Estate Notes Payable: The fair values of the Amended Unsecured Credit Facility and 5.50%
term bonds payable as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 are estimated using discounted cash flow
analysis based on the current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing
arrangements.
91
NOTE R QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)
Summarized quarterly financial data for 2009 and 2008 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 Quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
First |
|
|
Second |
|
|
Third |
|
|
Fourth |
|
Net revenues |
|
$ |
15,347 |
|
|
$ |
19,355 |
|
|
$ |
18,252 |
|
|
$ |
20,547 |
|
Expenses |
|
|
24,709 |
|
|
|
29,046 |
|
|
|
27,613 |
|
|
|
53,780 |
|
Equity earnings (losses) from unconsolidated entities |
|
|
(62 |
) |
|
|
(86 |
) |
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes |
|
|
(9,424 |
) |
|
|
(9,777 |
) |
|
|
(9,428 |
) |
|
|
(33,214 |
) |
Income tax benefit |
|
|
830 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
617 |
|
|
|
31,413 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
($ |
8,594 |
) |
|
($ |
9,777 |
) |
|
($ |
8,811 |
) |
|
($ |
1,801 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (Loss) per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and Diluted |
|
($ |
0.99 |
) |
|
($ |
1.13 |
) |
|
($ |
1.01 |
) |
|
($ |
0.16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 Quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
First |
|
|
Second |
|
|
Third |
|
|
Fourth |
|
Net revenues |
|
$ |
30,532 |
|
|
$ |
24,930 |
|
|
$ |
22,359 |
|
|
$ |
32,545 |
|
Expenses |
|
|
(31,878 |
) |
|
|
(35,735 |
) |
|
|
(58,879 |
) |
|
|
(118,403 |
) |
Equity losses from unconsolidated entities |
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
(413 |
) |
|
|
(89 |
) |
|
|
(7,261 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
(1,395 |
) |
|
|
(11,218 |
) |
|
|
(36,609 |
) |
|
|
(93,119 |
) |
Income tax expense |
|
|
523 |
|
|
|
4,297 |
|
|
|
14,484 |
|
|
|
13,161 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
($ |
872 |
) |
|
($ |
6,921 |
) |
|
($ |
22,125 |
) |
|
($ |
79,958 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (Loss) per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and Diluted |
|
($ |
0.10 |
) |
|
($ |
0.81 |
) |
|
($ |
2.59 |
) |
|
($ |
9.33 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
|
Quarterly and year-to-date computations of per share amounts are made independently.
Therefore, the sum of per share amounts for the quarters may not agree with the per share
amounts for the year. |
|
|
2. |
|
During the fourth quarter of 2009, our impairment evaluation resulted in impairment
charges of $19,839, which included $260 in impairment charges for homes completed or under
construction, $11,919 in impairment charges for land developed and/or held for future
development and $7,660 for the Poinciana Parkway. |
|
|
3. |
|
During the fourth quarter of 2009, we decreased the deferred tax valuation allowance by
$18,670 due to new federal tax legislation, which results in our ability to carry back 2009
NOLs to prior years. |
|
|
4. |
|
During the fourth quarter of 2008, our impairment evaluation resulted in impairment
charges of $51,898, which included $5,168 in impairment charges for homes completed or
under construction and $46,730 in impairment charges for land developed and/or held for
future development. |
|
|
5. |
|
During the fourth quarter of 2008, we entered into two transactions with unaffiliated
third parties providing for the formation of LLCs. We subsequently sold developed and
partially-developed land to each of the LLCs. We acquired a minority ownership interest in
each of the LLCs and share in the management of each of the LLCs. These transactions
generated aggregate sales proceeds to Avatar of approximately $7,847 on assets with an
aggregate book value of approximately $29,334. We invested approximately $1,626 to acquire
equity interests in these LLCs. |
|
|
6. |
|
During the fourth quarter of 2008, an entity in which we own a 50% interest, sold all
of its real estate assets. This sale generated a pre-tax loss of approximately $7,100 to
Avatar. |
|
|
7. |
|
During the fourth quarter of 2008, we recorded a deferred tax asset valuation allowance
of $22,594 because we are now in a cumulative loss position over the evaluation period in
accordance with authoritative accounting guidance. |
92
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosures
Not applicable.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, our
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and
procedures were effective for the purpose of ensuring that material information required to be in
this report is made known to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, and others, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosures and are effective to provide reasonable assurance that such information is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms.
During the quarter ended December 31, 2009, we implemented a new accounting system that
included a new general ledger system and other financial information systems. Under the supervision
and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, we have determined that, during the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2009,
except for the described systems implementation, there were no changes in our internal control over
financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934) that have affected, or are reasonably likely to affect, materially, our internal control
over financial reporting.
See Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data for Managements Report on Internal
Control over Financial Reporting and the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm, as they relate to internal control over financial reporting, incorporated herein by
reference.
Item 9B. Other Information
None.
93
PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
A. |
|
Identification of Directors |
|
|
|
The information called for in this Item is incorporated by reference to Avatars 2010
definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
or before April 30, 2010. |
|
B. |
|
Identification of Executive Officers |
|
|
|
For information with respect to the executive officers of Avatar, see Executive
Officers of the Registrant at the end of Part I of this report. |
|
C. |
|
Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act |
|
|
|
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to Avatars 2010
definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
or before April 30, 2010. |
|
D. |
|
Code of Ethics |
|
|
|
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to Avatars 2010
definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
or before April 30, 2010. |
Item 11. Executive Compensation
The information called for by this Item is incorporated by reference to Avatars 2010
definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or before
April 30, 2010.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related
Stockholder Matters
The information called for by this Item is incorporated by reference to Avatars 2010
definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or before
April 30, 2010.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
The information called for by this Item is incorporated by reference to Avatars 2010
definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or before
April 30, 2010.
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
The information called for by this Item is incorporated by reference to Avatars 2010
definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or before
April 30, 2010.
94
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
(a) (1) Financial Statements and Schedules:
See Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this report.
(a) (2) Financial Statements Schedules:
(b)
|
|
|
Schedule II
|
|
Valuation and Qualifying Accounts |
Schedules other than those listed above are omitted, since the information required is not
applicable or is included in the financial statements or notes thereto.
Exhibits:
|
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
*
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation, as amended and restated May
28, 1998 (filed as Exhibit 3(a) to Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended June 30, 1998 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated
herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
*
|
|
Certificate of Amendment of Restated Certificate of
Incorporation, dated May 26, 2000 (filed as Exhibit 3(a) to
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2000 (File No.
0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
*
|
|
Amended and Restated By-laws as of March 5, 2004 (filed as
Exhibit 3(d) to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2003 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
*
|
|
Indenture, dated March 30, 2004, between Avatar Holdings
Inc. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, in respect of 4.50%
Convertible Senior Notes due 2024 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 (File No.
0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
* 1
|
|
Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement, dated as of February
19, 1999, by and between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Jonathan
Fels (filed as Exhibit 10(p) to Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1998 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein
by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
* 1
|
|
Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement, dated as of February
19, 1999, by and between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Michael
Levy (filed as Exhibit 10(s) to Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1998 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein
by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
*1
|
|
Amended and Restated 1997 Incentive and Capital Accumulation
Plan (filed as Exhibit 10(a) to Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended June 30, 1999 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated
herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
*1
|
|
Amendment to Amended and Restated 1997 Incentive and Capital
Accumulation Plan (filed as Exhibit 10(a) to Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended June 30, 1999 (filed as Exhibit 99.3 to
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-63278),
filed on June 19, 2001, and incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
*1
|
|
Executive Incentive Compensation Plan (filed as Exhibit
10(a) to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2001 (File
No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference). |
95
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statements Schedules continued
|
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
*1
|
|
Amendment to Amended and
Restated Restricted
Stock Unit Agreement,
dated as of March 27,
2003, between Avatar
Holdings Inc. and Gerald
D. Kelfer (filed as
Exhibit 10.2 to Form
10-Q for the quarter
ended March 31, 2003
(File No. 0-7616), and
incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
*1
|
|
Restricted Stock Unit
Agreement (50,000
units), dated as of
March 27, 2003, between
Avatar Holdings Inc. and
Gerald D. Kelfer (filed
as Exhibit 10.4 to Form
10-Q for the quarter
ended March 31, 2003
(File No. 0-7616), and
incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
*1
|
|
Restricted Stock Unit
Agreement (23,700
units), dated as of
March 27, 2003, between
Avatar Holdings Inc. and
Gerald D. Kelfer (filed
as Exhibit 10.6 to Form
10-Q for the quarter
ended March 31, 2003
(File No. 0-7616), and
incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
*1
|
|
Restricted Stock Unit
Agreement (20,000
units), dated as of
March 27, 2003, between
Avatar Holdings Inc. and
Gerald D. Kelfer (filed
as Exhibit 10.7 to Form
10-Q for the quarter
ended March 31, 2003
(File No. 0-7616), and
incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.10
|
|
*1
|
|
Restricted Stock Unit
Agreement (15,000
units), dated as of
March 27, 2003, between
Avatar Holdings Inc. and
Gerald D. Kelfer (filed
as Exhibit 10.8 to Form
10-Q for the quarter
ended March 31, 2003
(File No. 0-7616), and
incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.11
|
|
*1
|
|
Restricted Stock Unit
Agreement (16,300
units), dated as of
March 27, 2003, between
Avatar Holdings Inc. and
Gerald D. Kelfer (filed
as Exhibit 10.9 to Form
10-Q for the quarter
ended March 31, 2003
(File No. 0-7616), and
incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.12
|
|
*1
|
|
Nonqualified Stock
Option Agreement, dated
as of March 13, 2003,
between Avatar Holdings
Inc. and Jonathan Fels
(filed as Exhibit 10.12
to Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31,
2003 (File No. 0-7616),
and incorporated herein
by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.13
|
|
*1
|
|
Restricted Stock Unit
Agreement, dated as of
March 27, 2003, between
Avatar Holdings Inc. and
Jonathan Fels (filed as
Exhibit 10.13 to Form
10-Q for the quarter
ended March 31, 2003
(File No. 0-7616), and
incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.14
|
|
*1
|
|
Nonqualified Stock
Option Agreement, dated
as of March 13, 2003,
between Avatar Holdings
Inc. and Michael Levy
(filed as Exhibit 10.16
to Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31,
2003 (File No. 0-7616),
and incorporated herein
by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.15
|
|
*1
|
|
Restricted Stock Unit
Agreement, dated as of
March 27, 2003, between
Avatar Holdings Inc. and
Michael Levy (filed as
Exhibit 10.17 to Form
10-Q for the quarter
ended March 31, 2003
(File No. 0-7616), and
incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.16
|
|
*1
|
|
Restricted Stock Unit
Agreement, dated as of
July 22, 2004, between
Avatar Holdings Inc. and
Juanita Kerrigan (filed
as Exhibit 10.3 to Form
10-Q for the quarter
ended June 30, 2004
(File No. 0-7616), and
incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.17
|
|
*1
|
|
Amended and Restated
1997 Incentive and
Capital Accumulation
Plan (2005 Restatement)
(filed as Exhibit 10.1
to Form 8-K dated May
24, 2005 (File No.
0-7616), and
incorporated herein by
reference). |
96
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statements Schedules continued
|
|
|
|
|
10.18
|
|
*1
|
|
2005 Executive Incentive
Compensation Plan (filed
as Exhibit 10.2 to Form
8-Kdated May 24, 2005
(File No. 0-7616), and
incorporated herein by
reference) |
|
|
|
|
|
10.19
|
|
*1
|
|
Letter Agreement, dated
as of May 20, 2005,
between Avatar Holdings
Inc. and Gerald D.
Kelfer (filed as Exhibit
10.3 to Form 8-K dated
May 24, 2005 (File No.
0-7616), and
incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.20
|
|
*1
|
|
Amended and Restated
Employment Agreement,
dated as of April 15,
2005, between Avatar
Holdings Inc. and Gerald
D. Kelfer (filed as
Exhibit 10.4 to Form 8-K
dated May 24, 2005 (File
No. 0-7616), and
incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.21
|
|
*1
|
|
2008-2010 Earnings
Participation Award
Agreement, dated as of
April 15, 2005, between
Avatar Holdings Inc. and
Gerald D. Kelfer (filed
as Exhibit 10.7 to Form
8-K dated May 24, 2005
(File No. 0-7616), and
incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.22
|
|
*1
|
|
Restricted Stock Unit
Agreement (30,000 units
@ $65.00), dated as of
April 15, 2005, between
Avatar Holdings Inc. and
Gerald D. Kelfer (filed
as Exhibit 10.8 to Form
8-K dated May 24, 2005
(File No. 0-7616), and
incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.23
|
|
*1
|
|
Restricted Stock Unit
Agreement (30,000 units
@ $72.50), dated as of
April 15, 2005, between
Avatar Holdings Inc. and
Gerald D. Kelfer (filed
as Exhibit 10.9 to Form
8-K dated May 24, 2005
(File No. 0-7616), and
incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.24
|
|
*1
|
|
Restricted Stock Unit
Agreement (30,000 units
@ $80.00), dated as of
April 15, 2005, between
Avatar Holdings Inc. and
Gerald D. Kelfer (filed
as Exhibit 10.10 to Form
8-K dated May 24, 2005
(File No. 0-7616), and
incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.25
|
|
*1
|
|
Letter Agreement, dated
as of May 20, 2005,
among Avatar Holdings
Inc., Avatar Properties
Inc. and Jonathan Fels
(filed as Exhibit 10.11
to Form 8-K dated May
24, 2005 (File No.
0-7616), and
incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.26
|
|
*1
|
|
Amended and Restated
Employment Agreement,
dated as of April 15,
2005, between Avatar
Properties Inc. and
Jonathan Fels (filed as
Exhibit 10.12 to Form
8-K dated May 24, 2005
(File No. 0-7616), and
incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.27
|
|
*1
|
|
2008-2010 Earnings
Participation Award
Agreement, dated as of
April 15, 2005, between
Avatar Holdings Inc. and
Jonathan Fels (filed as
Exhibit 10.15 to Form
8-K dated May 24, 2005
(File No. 0-7616), and
incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.28
|
|
*1
|
|
Restricted Stock Unit
Agreement (25,000 units
@ $65.00), dated as of
April 15, 2005, between
Avatar Holdings Inc. and
Jonathan Fels (filed as
Exhibit 10.16 to Form
8-K dated May 24, 2005
(File No. 0-7616), and
incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.29
|
|
*1
|
|
Restricted Stock Unit
Agreement (25,000 units
@ $72.50), dated as of
April 15, 2005, between
Avatar Holdings Inc. and
Jonathan Fels (filed as
Exhibit 10.17 to Form
8-K dated May 24, 2005
(File No. 0-7616), and
incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.30
|
|
*1
|
|
Restricted Stock Unit
Agreement (25,000 units
@ $80.00), dated as of
April 15, 2005, between
Avatar Holdings Inc. and
Jonathan Fels (filed as
Exhibit 10.18 to Form
8-K dated May 24, 2005
(File No. 0-7616), and
incorporated herein by
reference). |
97
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statements Schedules continued
|
|
|
|
|
10.31
|
|
*1
|
|
Letter Agreement, dated
as of May 20, 2005,
among Avatar Holdings
Inc., Avatar Properties
Inc. and Michael Levy
(filed as Exhibit 10.19
to Form 8-K dated May
24, 2005 (File No.
0-7616), and
incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.32
|
|
*1
|
|
Amended and Restated
Employment Agreement,
dated as of April 15,
2005, between Avatar
Properties Inc. and
Michael Levy (filed as
Exhibit 10.20 to Form
8-K dated May 24, 2005
(File No. 0-7616), and
incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.33
|
|
*1
|
|
2008-2010 Earnings
Participation Award
Agreement, dated as of
April 15, 2005, between
Avatar Holdings Inc. and
Michael Levy (filed as
Exhibit 10.23 to Form
8-K dated May 24, 2005
(File No. 0-7616), and
incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.34
|
|
*1
|
|
Restricted Stock Unit
Agreement (25,000 units
@ $65.00), dated as of
April 15, 2005, between
Avatar Holdings Inc. and
Michael Levy (filed as
Exhibit 10.24 to Form
8-K dated May 24, 2005
(File No. 0-7616), and
incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.35
|
|
*1
|
|
Restricted Stock Unit
Agreement (25,000 units
@ $72.50), dated as of
April 15, 2005, between
Avatar Holdings Inc. and
Michael Levy (filed as
Exhibit 10.25 to Form
8-K dated May 24, 2005
(File No. 0-7616), and
incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.36
|
|
*1
|
|
Restricted Stock Unit
Agreement (25,000 units
@ $80.00), dated as of
April 15, 2005, between
Avatar Holdings Inc. and
Michael Levy (filed as
Exhibit 10.26 to Form
8-K dated May 24, 2005
(File No. 0-7616), and
incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.37
|
|
*1
|
|
Form of Deferred
Compensation Agreement
for Non-Employee
Directors Fees (filed
as Exhibit 10.1 to Form
8-K dated June 13, 2005
(File No. 0-7616), and
incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.38
|
|
*1
|
|
First Amendment, dated
as of September 28,
2005, to the 2005
Amended and Restated
Employment Agreement,
dated as of April 15,
2005, between Avatar
Properties Inc. and
Jonathan Fels (filed as
Exhibit 10.5 to Form
10-Q for the quarter
ended September 30, 2005
(File No. 0-7616), and
incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.39
|
|
*1
|
|
First Amendment, dated
as of September 28,
2005, to the 2005
Amended and Restated
Employment Agreement,
dated as of April 15,
2005, between Avatar
Properties Inc. and
Michael Levy (filed as
Exhibit 10.6 to Form
10-Q for the quarter
ended September 30, 2005
(File No. 0-7616), and
incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.40
|
|
*1
|
|
Form of Non-Employee
Director Amended and
Restated Restricted
Stock Unit Agreement
(filed as Exhibit 10.3
to Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30,
2009 (File No. 0-7616),
and incorporated by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.41
|
|
*
|
|
Option Agreement, dated
October 20, 2006,
between Avatar
Properties Inc. and The
Nature Conservancy
(filed as Exhibit 10.1
to Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September
30, 2006 (File No.
0-7616), and
incorporated by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.42
|
|
*1
|
|
Amendment to the Amended
and Restated Employment
Agreement, dated as of
December 26, 2006,
between Avatar Holdings
Inc. and Gerald D.
Kelfer (filed as Exhibit
10.1 to Form 8-K dated
December 28, 2006 (File
No. 0-7616), and
incorporated by
reference). |
98
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statements Schedules continued
|
|
|
|
|
10.43
|
|
*1
|
|
Second Amended and
Restated Earnings
Participation Award
Agreement, dated as of
December 26, 2006,
between Avatar Holdings
Inc. and Gerald D.
Kelfer (filed as Exhibit
10.2 to Form 8-K dated
December 28, 2006 (File
No. 0-7616), and
incorporated by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.44
|
|
*1
|
|
Second Amendment to the
2005 Amended and
Restated Employment
Agreement, dated as of
December 26, 2006,
between Avatar
Properties Inc. and
Jonathan Fels (filed as
Exhibit 10.3 to Form 8-K
dated December 28, 2006
(File No. 0-7616), and
incorporated by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.45
|
|
*1
|
|
Second Amended and
Restated Earnings
Participation Award
Agreement, dated as of
December 26, 2006,
between Avatar Holdings
Inc. and Jonathan Fels
(filed as Exhibit 10.4
to Form 8-K dated
December 28, 2006 (File
No. 0-7616), and
incorporated by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.46
|
|
*1
|
|
Second Amendment to the
2005 Amended and
Restated Employment
Agreement, dated as of
December 26, 2006,
between Avatar
Properties Inc. and
Michael F. Levy (filed
as Exhibit 10.5 to Form
8-K dated December 28,
2006 (File No. 0-7616),
and incorporated by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.47
|
|
*1
|
|
Second Amended and
Restated Earnings
Participation Award
Agreement, dated as of
December 26, 2006,
between Avatar Holdings
Inc. and Michael F. Levy
(filed as Exhibit 10.6
to Form 8-K dated
December 28, 2006 (File
No. 0-7616), and
incorporated by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.48
|
|
*1
|
|
Employment Agreement,
dated as of November 8,
2006, between Avatar
Holdings Inc. and
Patricia Kimball
Fletcher (filed as
Exhibit 10(bx) to Form
10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2006 (File
No. 0-7616),
incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.49
|
|
*1
|
|
Restricted Stock Unit
Agreement, dated as of
November 8, 2006,
between Avatar Holdings
Inc. and Patricia
Kimball Fletcher (filed
as Exhibit 10(by) to
Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2006
(File No. 0-7616),
incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.50
|
|
*1
|
|
Letter Agreement, dated
as of November 8, 2006,
among Avatar Holdings
Inc. and Patricia
Kimball Fletcher (filed
as Exhibit 10(bz) to
Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2006
(File No. 0-7616),
incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.51
|
|
*
|
|
Poinciana Parkway
Regulatory Agreement
dated as of December 15,
2006 by and between
Osceola County, Florida
and Avatar Properties
Inc. (filed as Exhibit
10(ca) to Form 10-K for
the year ended December
31, 2006 (File No.
0-7616), incorporated
herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.52
|
|
*
|
|
Poinciana Parkway
Regulatory Agreement
dated as of December 15,
2006 by and between Polk
County, Florida and
Avatar Properties Inc.
(filed as Exhibit 10(cb)
to Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31,
2006 (File No. 0-7616),
incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.53
|
|
*1
|
|
Employment Agreement,
dated June 26, 2007,
between Avatar Holdings
Inc. and Randy Kotler
(filed as Exhibit 10.2
to Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30,
2007 (File No. 0-7616),
incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.54
|
|
*1
|
|
Amendment to Avatar
Holdings Inc. Amended
and Restated 1997
Incentive and Capital
Accumulation Plan (2005
Restatement) (filed as
Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K
dated June 4, 2007 (File
No. 0-7616), and
incorporated herein by
reference). |
99
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statements Schedules continued
|
|
|
|
|
10.55
|
|
*
|
|
Amended and Restated
Credit Agreement, dated
March 27, 2008, by and
among Avatar Holdings
Inc. (as Guarantor),
Avatar Properties Inc.
(as Borrower), Wachovia
Bank, National
Association (as
Administrative Agent and
Lender), and certain
financial institutions
as lenders (filed as
Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K
dated April 2, 2008
(File No. 0-7616), and
incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.56
|
|
*
|
|
Second Restated Guaranty
Agreement, dated as of
March 27, 2008, executed
on behalf of Avatar
Holdings Inc.
(Guarantor) in favor
of the lending
institution(s)
identified therein and
Wachovia Bank, National
Association (filed as
Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K
dated April 2, 2008
(File No. 0-7616), and
incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.57
|
|
*1
|
|
Restricted Stock Unit
Agreement (2,500 units @
$80.86), dated June 26,
2007, between Avatar
Holdings Inc. and Randy
Kotler (filed as Exhibit
10.3 to Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended March
31, 2008 (File No.
0-7616), and
incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.58
|
|
*1
|
|
Restricted Stock Unit
Agreement (2,500 units @
$84.71), dated June 26,
2007, between Avatar
Holdings Inc. and Randy
Kotler (filed as Exhibit
10.4 to Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended March
31, 2008 (File No.
0-7616), and
incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.59
|
|
*1
|
|
Restricted Stock Unit
Agreement (2,500 units @
$88.56), dated June 26,
2007, between Avatar
Holdings Inc. and Randy
Kotler (filed as Exhibit
10.5 to Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended March
31, 2008 (File No.
0-7616), and
incorporated herein by
reference) |
|
|
|
|
|
10.60
|
|
*1
|
|
Director Compensation
(filed as Exhibit 10.2
to Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30,
2009 (File No. 0-7616),
and incorporated herein
by reference) |
|
|
|
|
|
10.61
|
|
*
|
|
First Amended and
Restated Poinciana
Parkway Regulatory
Agreement, dated as of
July 25, 2008, by and
between Avatar
Properties Inc. and
Osceola County, Florida
(filed as Exhibit 10.1
to Form 8-K dated July
29, 2008 (File No.
0-7616), and
incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.62
|
|
*
|
|
Transportation
Concurrency Agreement,
dated December 15, 2006,
by and between Avatar
Properties Inc. and
Osceola County, Florida
(filed as Exhibit 10.2
to Form 8-K dated July
29, 2008 (File No.
0-7616), and
incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.63
|
|
*
|
|
Amendment to
Transportation
Concurrency Agreement,
dated as of July 25,
2008, by and between
Avatar Properties Inc.
and Osceola County,
Florida (filed as
Exhibit 10.3 to Form 8-K
dated July 29, 2008
(File No. 0-7616), and
incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.64
|
|
*
|
|
First Amended and
Restated Poinciana
Parkway Regulatory
Agreement, dated as of
August 6, 2008, by and
between Avatar
Properties Inc. and Polk
County, Florida (filed
as Exhibit 10.1 to Form
8-K dated August 11,
2008 (File No. 0-7616),
and incorporated herein
by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.65
|
|
*1
|
|
Amended and Restated
Restricted Stock Unit
Agreement, dated
December 22, 2008,
between Avatar Holdings
Inc. and Gerald D.
Kelfer (filed as Exhibit
10.1 to Form 8-K dated
December 22, 2008 (File
No. 0-7616), and
incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.66
|
|
*1
|
|
Amended and Restated
Restricted Stock Unit
Agreement, dated
December 22, 2008,
between Avatar Holdings
Inc. and Jonathan Fels
(filed as Exhibit 10.2
to Form 8-K dated
December 22, 2008 (File
No. 0-7616), and
incorporated herein by
reference). |
100
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statements Schedules continued
|
|
|
|
|
10.67
|
|
*1
|
|
Amended and Restated
Restricted Stock Unit
Agreement, dated December
22, 2008, between Avatar
Holdings Inc. and Michael
Levy (filed as Exhibit
10.3 to Form 8-K dated
December 22, 2008 (File
No. 0-7616), and
incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.68
|
|
*1
|
|
Amended and Restated
Restricted Stock Unit
Agreement, dated December
22, 2008, between Avatar
Holdings Inc. and Patricia
K. Fletcher (filed as
Exhibit 10.4 to Form 8-K
dated December 22, 2008
(File No. 0-7616), and
incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.69
|
|
*1
|
|
Amended and Restated
Employment Agreement,
dated December 22, 2008,
between Avatar Holdings
Inc. and Gerald D. Kelfer
(filed as Exhibit 10.5 to
Form 8-K dated December
22, 2008 (File No.
0-7616), and incorporated
herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.70
|
|
*1
|
|
Amended and Restated
2008-2010 Earnings
Participation Award
Agreement, dated December
22, 2008, between Avatar
Holdings Inc. and Gerald
D. Kelfer (filed as
Exhibit 10.6 to Form 8-K
dated December 22, 2008
(File No. 0-7616), and
incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.71
|
|
*1
|
|
Amended and Restated
Employment Agreement,
dated December 22, 2008,
between Avatar Properties
Inc. and Jonathan Fels
(filed as Exhibit 10.7 to
Form 8-K dated December
22, 2008 (File No.
0-7616), and incorporated
herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.72
|
|
*1
|
|
Amended and Restated
2008-2010 Earnings
Participation Award
Agreement, dated December
22, 2008, between Avatar
Holdings Inc. and Jonathan
Fels (filed as Exhibit
10.8 to Form 8-K dated
December 22, 2008 (File
No. 0-7616), and
incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.73
|
|
*1
|
|
Amended and Restated
Employment Agreement,
dated December 22, 2008,
between Avatar Properties
Inc. and Michael Levy
(filed as Exhibit 10.9 to
Form 8-K dated December
22, 2008 (File No.
0-7616), and incorporated
herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.74
|
|
*1
|
|
Amended and Restated
2008-2010 Earnings
Participation Award
Agreement, dated December
22, 2008, between Avatar
Holdings Inc. and Michael
Levy (filed as Exhibit
10.10 to Form 8-K dated
December 22, 2008 (File
No. 0-7616), and
incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.75
|
|
*1
|
|
Amended and Restated
Employment Agreement,
dated December 22, 2008,
between Avatar Holdings
Inc. and Patricia K.
Fletcher (filed as Exhibit
10.11 to Form 8-K dated
December 22, 2008 (File
No. 0-7616), and
incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.76
|
|
*1
|
|
Amended and Restated
Employment Agreement,
dated December 22, 2008,
between Avatar Holdings
Inc. and Randy Kotler
(filed as Exhibit 10.12 to
Form 8-K dated December
22, 2008 (File No.
0-7616), and incorporated
herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.77
|
|
*1
|
|
Amended and Restated
Restricted Stock Unit
Agreement, dated December
22, 2008, between Avatar
Holdings Inc. and Randy
Kotler (2,500 Units;
hurdle price condition: $80.86) (filed as Exhibit
10.13 to Form 8-K dated
December 22, 2008 (File
No. 0-7616), and
incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.78
|
|
*1
|
|
Amended and Restated
Restricted Stock Unit
Agreement, dated December
22, 2008, between Avatar
Holdings Inc. and Randy
Kotler (2,500 Units;
hurdle price condition
$84.71) (filed as Exhibit
10.14 to Form 8-K dated
December 22, 2008 (File
No. 0-7616), and
incorporated herein by
reference). |
101
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statements Schedules continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.79
|
|
|
*1 |
|
|
Amended and Restated Restricted Stock Unit Agreement, dated December 22,
2008, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Randy Kotler (2,500 Units; hurdle
price condition $88.56) (filed as Exhibit 10.15 to Form 8-K dated
December 22, 2008 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.80
|
|
|
*1 |
|
|
Amended and Restated Form of Deferred Compensation Agreement for
Non-Employee Directors Fees (filed as Exhibit 10.97 to Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2008 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein
by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.81
|
|
|
*1 |
|
|
Compensation of certain named executive officers (filed as Exhibit 10.1
to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, (File No. 0-7616), and
incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.82
|
|
|
* |
|
|
First Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of May
21, 2009, by and among Avatar Properties Inc. (Borrower), Avatar
Holdings Inc., (Guarantor), the several lenders from time to time
parties thereto (Lenders), and Wachovia Bank, National Association
(Agent and Lender) (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K dated May 26,
2009 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.83
|
|
|
* |
|
|
Underwriting Agreement, dated September 23, 2009, between Avatar Holdings
Inc., Avatar Properties Inc., Frenchmans Yacht Club Developers, LLC and
Barclays Capital Inc., (filed as Exhibit 1.1 to Form 8-K dated September
23, 2009 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.84
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
First Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, between
Avatar Holdings Inc. and Patricia Kimball Fletcher, dated October 26,
2009 (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.85
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
Separation and Release Agreement, between Avatar Properties Inc., and
Jonathan Fels, dated December 29, 2009 (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsidiaries of Registrant (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer required by 18 U.S.C. Section
1350 (as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
(furnished herewith). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer required by 18 U.S.C. Section
1350 (as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
(furnished herewith). |
|
|
|
* |
|
These exhibits are incorporated by reference and are on file with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. |
|
1 |
|
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. |
102
SCHEDULE II VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
AVATAR HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
Beginning |
|
|
Charged to Costs |
|
|
Deduction/ |
|
|
End of |
|
|
|
of Period |
|
|
and Expenses |
|
|
(Addition) |
|
|
Period |
|
Year ended December 31, 2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deducted from asset accounts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred gross profit on
homesite sales |
|
$ |
23 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(1 |
)(1) |
|
$ |
22 |
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
747 |
|
|
|
499 |
(2) |
|
|
(54 |
)(3) |
|
|
1,192 |
|
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets |
|
|
19,567 |
|
|
|
(9,148 |
)(4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,419 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
20,337 |
|
|
$ |
(8,649 |
) |
|
$ |
(55 |
) |
|
$ |
11,633 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2008: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deducted from asset accounts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred gross profit on
homesite sales |
|
$ |
28 |
|
|
$ |
22 |
(2) |
|
($ |
27 |
)(1) |
|
$ |
23 |
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
312 |
|
|
|
435 |
(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
747 |
|
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,567 |
(4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,567 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
340 |
|
|
$ |
20,024 |
|
|
($ |
27 |
) |
|
$ |
20,337 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2007: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deducted from asset accounts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred gross profit on
homesite sales |
|
$ |
69 |
|
|
$ |
9 |
(1) |
|
$ |
(50 |
)(1) |
|
$ |
28 |
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
287 |
|
|
|
25 |
(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
312 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
356 |
|
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
($ |
50 |
) |
|
$ |
340 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
(Credit) charge to operations as an (increase) decrease to revenues. |
|
(2) |
|
Charge to operations as an increase to real estate expenses. |
|
(3) |
|
Uncollectible accounts written off. |
|
(4) |
|
In accordance with ASC 740, Avatar evaluates its deferred tax assets quarterly to determine if
valuation allowances are required. ASC 740 requires that companies assess whether valuation
allowances should be established based on the consideration of all available evidence using a more
likely than not standard. During 2008, we established a valuation allowance against our deferred
tax assets. Based on our evaluation during the year ended December 31, 2008, we recorded an
additional valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets generated as a result of our net
loss during the year ended December 31, 2008. Our cumulative loss position over the evaluation
period and the uncertain and volatile market conditions provided significant evidence supporting
the need for a valuation allowance. During the first nine months of 2009, we recognized an increase
of $9,522 in the valuation allowance. However due to the new federal tax legislation as discussed
above, we decreased the valuation allowance for the year ended
December 31, 2009 by $9,148. As of
December 31, 2009, our deferred tax asset valuation allowance
was $10,419. In future periods, the
allowance could be reduced based on sufficient evidence indicating that it is more likely than not
that a portion of our deferred tax assets will be realized.
|
103
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
AVATAR HOLDINGS INC.
|
|
Dated: March 16, 2010 |
By: |
/s/ Randy L. Kotler
|
|
|
|
Randy L. Kotler, Executive |
|
|
|
Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has
been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant in the
capacities and on the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: March 16, 2010 |
By: |
/s/ Gerald D. Kelfer
|
|
|
|
Gerald D. Kelfer, Director, President, |
|
|
|
Vice Chairman of the Board of
Directors, Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: March 16, 2010 |
By: |
/s/ Randy L. Kotler
|
|
|
|
Randy L. Kotler, Executive |
|
|
|
Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: March 16, 2010 |
By: |
/s/ Michael P. Rama
|
|
|
|
Michael P. Rama, Controller and Chief |
|
|
|
Accounting Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: March 16, 2010 |
By: |
/s/ Joshua Nash
|
|
|
|
Joshua Nash, Director and Chairman of the Board |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: March 16, 2010 |
By: |
/s/ Paul D. Barnett
|
|
|
|
Paul D. Barnett, Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: March 16, 2010 |
By: |
/s/ Milton Dresner
|
|
|
|
Milton Dresner, Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: March 16, 2010 |
By: |
/s/ Roger W. Einiger
|
|
|
|
Roger W. Einiger, Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: March 16, 2010 |
By: |
/s/ Kenneth T. Rosen
|
|
|
|
Kenneth T. Rosen, Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: March 16, 2010 |
By: |
/s/ Joel M. Simon
|
|
|
|
Joel M. Simon, Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: March 16, 2010 |
By: |
/s/ Beth A. Stewart
|
|
|
|
Beth A. Stewart, Director |
|
|
|
|
|
104
Exhibit Index
|
|
|
|
* |
|
These exhibits are incorporated by reference and are on file with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. |
|
1 |
|
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. |
|
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
*
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation, as amended and restated May
28, 1998 (filed as Exhibit 3(a) to Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended June 30, 1998 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated
herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
*
|
|
Certificate of Amendment of Restated Certificate of
Incorporation, dated May 26, 2000 (filed as Exhibit 3(a) to
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2000 (File No.
0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
*
|
|
Amended and Restated By-laws as of March 5, 2004 (filed as
Exhibit 3(d) to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2003 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
*
|
|
Indenture, dated March 30, 2004, between Avatar Holdings
Inc. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, in respect of 4.50%
Convertible Senior Notes due 2024 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 (File No.
0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
* 1
|
|
Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement, dated as of February
19, 1999, by and between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Jonathan
Fels (filed as Exhibit 10(p) to Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1998 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein
by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
* 1
|
|
Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement, dated as of February
19, 1999, by and between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Michael
Levy (filed as Exhibit 10(s) to Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1998 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein
by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
*1
|
|
Amended and Restated 1997 Incentive and Capital Accumulation
Plan (filed as Exhibit 10(a) to Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended June 30, 1999 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated
herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
*1
|
|
Amendment to Amended and Restated 1997 Incentive and Capital
Accumulation Plan (filed as Exhibit 10(a) to Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended June 30, 1999 (filed as Exhibit 99.3 to
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-63278),
filed on June 19, 2001, and incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
*1
|
|
Executive Incentive Compensation Plan (filed as Exhibit
10(a) to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2001 (File
No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
*1
|
|
Amendment to Amended and Restated Restricted Stock Unit
Agreement, dated as of March 27, 2003, between Avatar
Holdings Inc. and Gerald D. Kelfer (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 (File No.
0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
*1
|
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (50,000 units), dated as of
March 27, 2003, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Gerald D.
Kelfer (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended March 31, 2003 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated
herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
*1
|
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (23,700 units), dated as of
March 27, 2003, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Gerald D.
Kelfer (filed as Exhibit 10.6 to Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended March 31, 2003 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated
herein by reference). |
105
Exhibit Index continued
|
|
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
*1
|
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (20,000 units),
dated as of March 27, 2003, between Avatar
Holdings Inc. and Gerald D. Kelfer (filed as
Exhibit 10.7 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2003 (File No. 0-7616), and
incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.10
|
|
*1
|
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (15,000 units),
dated as of March 27, 2003, between Avatar
Holdings Inc. and Gerald D. Kelfer (filed as
Exhibit 10.8 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2003 (File No. 0-7616), and
incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.11
|
|
*1
|
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (16,300 units),
dated as of March 27, 2003, between Avatar
Holdings Inc. and Gerald D. Kelfer (filed as
Exhibit 10.9 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2003 (File No. 0-7616), and
incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.12
|
|
*1
|
|
Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement, dated as of
March 13, 2003, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and
Jonathan Fels (filed as Exhibit 10.12 to Form
10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 (File
No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.13
|
|
*1
|
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement, dated as of
March 27, 2003, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and
Jonathan Fels (filed as Exhibit 10.13 to Form
10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 (File
No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.14
|
|
*1
|
|
Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement, dated as of
March 13, 2003, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and
Michael Levy (filed as Exhibit 10.16 to Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 (File No.
0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.15
|
|
*1
|
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement, dated as of
March 27, 2003, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and
Michael Levy (filed as Exhibit 10.17 to Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 (File No.
0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.16
|
|
*1
|
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement, dated as of July
22, 2004, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and
Juanita Kerrigan (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to Form
10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 (File
No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.17
|
|
*1
|
|
Amended and Restated 1997 Incentive and Capital
Accumulation Plan (2005 Restatement) (filed as
Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K dated May 24, 2005 (File
No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.18
|
|
*1
|
|
2005 Executive Incentive Compensation Plan (filed
as Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K dated May 24, 2005
(File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.19
|
|
*1
|
|
Letter Agreement, dated as of May 20, 2005,
between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Gerald D. Kelfer
(filed as Exhibit 10.3 to Form 8-K dated May 24,
2005 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein
by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.20
|
|
*1
|
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated
as of April 15, 2005, between Avatar Holdings
Inc. and Gerald D. Kelfer (filed as Exhibit 10.4
to Form 8-K dated May 24, 2005 (File No. 0-7616),
and incorporated herein by reference). |
106
Exhibit Index continued
|
|
|
|
|
10.21
|
|
*1
|
|
2008-2010 Earnings Participation Award Agreement,
dated as of April 15, 2005, between Avatar
Holdings Inc. and Gerald D. Kelfer (filed as
Exhibit 10.7 to Form 8-K dated May 24, 2005 (File
No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.22
|
|
*1
|
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (30,000 units @
$65.00), dated as of April 15, 2005, between
Avatar Holdings Inc. and Gerald D. Kelfer (filed
as Exhibit 10.8 to Form 8-K dated May 24, 2005
(File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.23
|
|
*1
|
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (30,000 units @
$72.50), dated as of April 15, 2005, between
Avatar Holdings Inc. and Gerald D. Kelfer (filed
as Exhibit 10.9 to Form 8-K dated May 24, 2005
(File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.24
|
|
*1
|
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (30,000 units @
$80.00), dated as of April 15, 2005, between
Avatar Holdings Inc. and Gerald D. Kelfer (filed
as Exhibit 10.10 to Form 8-K dated May 24, 2005
(File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.25
|
|
*1
|
|
Letter Agreement, dated as of May 20, 2005, among
Avatar Holdings Inc., Avatar Properties Inc. and
Jonathan Fels (filed as Exhibit 10.11 to Form 8-K
dated May 24, 2005 (File No. 0-7616), and
incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.26
|
|
*1
|
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated
as of April 15, 2005, between Avatar Properties
Inc. and Jonathan Fels (filed as Exhibit 10.12 to
Form 8-K dated May 24, 2005 (File No. 0-7616),
and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.27
|
|
*1
|
|
2008-2010 Earnings Participation Award Agreement,
dated as of April 15, 2005, between Avatar
Holdings Inc. and Jonathan Fels (filed as Exhibit
10.15 to Form 8-K dated May 24, 2005 (File No.
0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.28
|
|
*1
|
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (25,000 units @
$65.00), dated as of April 15, 2005, between
Avatar Holdings Inc. and Jonathan Fels (filed as
Exhibit 10.16 to Form 8-K dated May 24, 2005
(File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.29
|
|
*1
|
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (25,000 units @
$72.50), dated as of April 15, 2005, between
Avatar Holdings Inc. and Jonathan Fels (filed as
Exhibit 10.17 to Form 8-K dated May 24, 2005
(File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.30
|
|
*1
|
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (25,000 units @
$80.00), dated as of April 15, 2005, between
Avatar Holdings Inc. and Jonathan Fels (filed as
Exhibit 10.18 to Form 8-K dated May 24, 2005
(File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.31
|
|
*1
|
|
Letter Agreement, dated as of May 20, 2005, among
Avatar Holdings Inc., Avatar Properties Inc. and
Michael Levy (filed as Exhibit 10.19 to Form 8-K
dated May 24, 2005 (File No. 0-7616), and
incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.32
|
|
*1
|
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated
as of April 15, 2005, between Avatar Properties
Inc. and Michael Levy (filed as Exhibit 10.20 to
Form 8-K dated May 24, 2005 (File No. 0-7616),
and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.33
|
|
*1
|
|
2008-2010 Earnings Participation Award Agreement,
dated as of April 15, 2005, between Avatar
Holdings Inc. and Michael Levy (filed as Exhibit
10.23 to Form 8-K dated May 24, 2005 (File No.
0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference). |
107
Exhibit Index continued
|
|
|
|
|
10.34
|
|
*1
|
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (25,000 units @
$65.00), dated as of April 15, 2005, between
Avatar Holdings Inc. and Michael Levy (filed as
Exhibit 10.24 to Form 8-K dated May 24, 2005
(File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.35
|
|
*1
|
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (25,000 units @
$72.50), dated as of April 15, 2005, between
Avatar Holdings Inc. and Michael Levy (filed as
Exhibit 10.25 to Form 8-K dated May 24, 2005
(File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.36
|
|
*1
|
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (25,000 units @
$80.00), dated as of April 15, 2005, between
Avatar Holdings Inc. and Michael Levy (filed as
Exhibit 10.26 to Form 8-K dated May 24, 2005
(File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.37
|
|
*1
|
|
Form of Deferred Compensation Agreement for
Non-Employee Directors Fees (filed as Exhibit
10.1 to Form 8-K dated June 13, 2005 (File No.
0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.38
|
|
*1
|
|
First Amendment, dated as of September 28, 2005,
to the 2005 Amended and Restated Employment
Agreement, dated as of April 15, 2005, between
Avatar Properties Inc. and Jonathan Fels (filed
as Exhibit 10.5 to Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 30, 2005 (File No. 0-7616), and
incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.39
|
|
*1
|
|
First Amendment, dated as of September 28, 2005,
to the 2005 Amended and Restated Employment
Agreement, dated as of April 15, 2005, between
Avatar Properties Inc. and Michael Levy (filed as
Exhibit 10.6 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2005 (File No. 0-7616), and
incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.40
|
|
*1
|
|
Form of Non-Employee Director Amended and
Restated Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (filed
as Exhibit 10.3 to Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended June 30, 2009 dated August 10, 2009 (File
No. 0-7616), and incorporated by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.41
|
|
|
|
Option Agreement, dated October 20, 2006, between
Avatar Properties Inc. and The Nature Conservancy
(filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 2006 (File No.
0-7616), and incorporated by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.42
|
|
*1
|
|
Amendment to the Amended and Restated Employment
Agreement, dated as of December 26, 2006, between
Avatar Holdings Inc. and Gerald D. Kelfer (filed
as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K dated December 28,
2006 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.43
|
|
*1
|
|
Second Amended and Restated Earnings
Participation Award Agreement, dated as of
December 26, 2006, between Avatar Holdings Inc.
and Gerald D. Kelfer (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to
Form 8-K dated December 28, 2006 (File No.
0-7616), and incorporated by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.44
|
|
*1
|
|
Second Amendment to the 2005 Amended and Restated
Employment Agreement, dated as of December 26,
2006, between Avatar Properties Inc. and Jonathan
Fels (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to Form 8-K dated
December 28, 2006 (File No. 0-7616), and
incorporated by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.45
|
|
*1
|
|
Second Amended and Restated Earnings
Participation Award Agreement, dated as of
December 26, 2006, between Avatar Holdings Inc.
and Jonathan Fels (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to Form
8-K dated December 28, 2006 (File No. 0-7616),
and incorporated by reference). |
108
Exhibit Index continued
|
|
|
|
|
10.46
|
|
*1
|
|
Second Amendment to the 2005 Amended and Restated
Employment Agreement, dated as of December 26,
2006, between Avatar Properties Inc. and Michael
F. Levy (filed as Exhibit 10.5 to Form 8-K dated
December 28, 2006 (File No. 0-7616), and
incorporated by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.47
|
|
*1
|
|
Second Amended and Restated Earnings
Participation Award Agreement, dated as of
December 26, 2006, between Avatar Holdings Inc.
and Michael F. Levy (filed as Exhibit 10.6 to
Form 8-K dated December 28, 2006 (File No.
0-7616), and incorporated by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.48
|
|
*1
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated as of November 8,
2006, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Patricia
Kimball Fletcher (filed as Exhibit 10(bx) to Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 (File
No. 0-7616), incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.49
|
|
*1
|
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement, dated as of
November 8, 2006, between Avatar Holdings Inc.
and Patricia Kimball Fletcher (filed as Exhibit
10(by) to Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2006 (File No. 0-7616), incorporated herein
by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.50
|
|
*1
|
|
Letter Agreement, dated as of November 8, 2006,
among Avatar Holdings Inc. and Patricia Kimball
Fletcher (filed as Exhibit 10(bz) to Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006 (File No.
0-7616), incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.51
|
|
*
|
|
Poinciana Parkway Regulatory Agreement dated as
of December 15, 2006 by and between Osceola
County, Florida and Avatar Properties Inc. (filed
as Exhibit 10(ca) to Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2006 (File No. 0-7616), incorporated
herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.52
|
|
*
|
|
Poinciana Parkway Regulatory Agreement dated as
of December 15, 2006 by and between Polk County,
Florida and Avatar Properties Inc. (filed as
Exhibit 10(cb) to Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2006 (File No. 0-7616), incorporated
herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.53
|
|
*1
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated June 26, 2007,
between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Randy Kotler
(filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 2007 (File No. 0-7616),
incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.54
|
|
*1
|
|
Amendment to Avatar Holdings Inc. Amended and
Restated 1997 Incentive and Capital Accumulation
Plan (2005 Restatement) (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to
Form 8-K dated June 4, 2007 (File No. 0-7616),
and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.55
|
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated
March 27, 2008, by and among Avatar Holdings Inc.
(as Guarantor), Avatar Properties Inc. (as
Borrower), Wachovia Bank, National Association
(as Administrative Agent and Lender), and certain
financial institutions as lenders (filed as
Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K dated April 2, 2008
(File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.56
|
|
|
|
Second Restated Guaranty Agreement, dated as of
March 27, 2008, executed on behalf of Avatar
Holdings Inc. (Guarantor) in favor of the
lending institution(s) identified therein and
Wachovia Bank, National Association (filed as
Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K dated April 2, 2008
(File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.57
|
|
*1
|
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (2,500 units @
$80.86), dated June 26, 2007, between Avatar
Holdings Inc. and Randy Kotler (filed as Exhibit
10.3 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
2008 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein
by reference). |
109
Exhibit Index continued
|
|
|
|
|
10.58
|
|
*1
|
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (2,500 units @
$84.71), dated June 26, 2007, between Avatar
Holdings Inc. and Randy Kotler (filed as Exhibit
10.4 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
2008 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein
by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.59
|
|
*1
|
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (2,500 units @
$88.56), dated June 26, 2007, between Avatar
Holdings Inc. and Randy Kotler (filed as Exhibit
10.5 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
2008 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein
by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.60
|
|
*1
|
|
Director Compensation (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009
(File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein
by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.61
|
|
|
|
First Amended and Restated Poinciana Parkway
Regulatory Agreement, dated as of July 25, 2008,
by and between Avatar Properties Inc. and Osceola
County, Florida (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form
8-K dated July 29, 2008 (File No. 0-7616), and
incorporated herein
by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.62
|
|
|
|
Transportation Concurrency Agreement, dated
December 15, 2006, by and between Avatar
Properties Inc. and Osceola County, Florida
(filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K dated July 29,
2008 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein
by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.63
|
|
|
|
Amendment to Transportation Concurrency
Agreement, dated as of July 25, 2008, by and
between Avatar Properties Inc. and Osceola
County, Florida (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to Form
8-K dated July 29, 2008 (File No. 0-7616), and
incorporated herein
by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.64
|
|
|
|
First Amended and Restated Poinciana Parkway
Regulatory Agreement, dated as of August 6, 2008,
by and between Avatar Properties Inc. and Polk
County, Florida (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form
8-K dated August 11, 2008 (File No. 0-7616), and
incorporated herein
by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.65
|
|
*1
|
|
Amended and Restated Restricted Stock Unit
Agreement, dated December 22, 2008, between
Avatar Holdings Inc. and Gerald D. Kelfer (filed
as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K dated December 22,
2008 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein
by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.66
|
|
*1
|
|
Amended and Restated Restricted Stock Unit
Agreement, dated December 22, 2008, between
Avatar Holdings Inc. and Jonathan Fels (filed as
Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K dated December 22, 2008
(File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.67
|
|
*1
|
|
Amended and Restated Restricted Stock Unit
Agreement, dated December 22, 2008, between
Avatar Holdings Inc. and Michael Levy (filed as
Exhibit 10.3 to Form 8-K dated December 22, 2008
(File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.68
|
|
*1
|
|
Amended and Restated Restricted Stock Unit
Agreement, dated December 22, 2008, between
Avatar Holdings Inc. and Patricia K. Fletcher
(filed as Exhibit 10.4 to Form 8-K dated December
22, 2008 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated
herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.69
|
|
*1
|
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated
December 22, 2008, between Avatar Holdings Inc.
and Gerald D. Kelfer (filed as Exhibit 10.5 to
Form 8-K dated December 22, 2008 (File No.
0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.70
|
|
*1
|
|
Amended and Restated 2008-2010 Earnings
Participation Award Agreement, dated December 22,
2008, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Gerald D.
Kelfer (filed as Exhibit 10.6 to Form 8-K dated
December 22, 2008 (File No. 0-7616), and
incorporated herein by reference). |
110
Exhibit Index continued
|
|
|
|
|
10.71
|
|
*1
|
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated
December 22, 2008, between Avatar Properties Inc.
and Jonathan Fels (filed as Exhibit 10.7 to Form
8-K dated December 22, 2008 (File No. 0-7616),
and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.72
|
|
*1
|
|
Amended and Restated 2008-2010 Earnings
Participation Award Agreement, dated December 22,
2008, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Jonathan
Fels (filed as Exhibit 10.8 to Form 8-K dated
December 22, 2008 (File No. 0-7616), and
incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.73
|
|
*1
|
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated
December 22, 2008, between Avatar Properties Inc.
and Michael Levy (filed as Exhibit 10.9 to Form
8-K dated December 22, 2008 (File No. 0-7616),
and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.74
|
|
*1
|
|
Amended and Restated 2008-2010 Earnings
Participation Award Agreement, dated December 22,
2008, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Michael
Levy (filed as Exhibit 10.10 to Form 8-K dated
December 22, 2008 (File No. 0-7616), and
incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.75
|
|
*1
|
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated
December 22, 2008, between Avatar Holdings Inc.
and Patricia K. Fletcher (filed as Exhibit 10.11
to Form 8-K dated December 22, 2008 (File No.
0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.76
|
|
*1
|
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated
December 22, 2008, between Avatar Holdings Inc.
and Randy Kotler (filed as Exhibit 10.12 to Form
8-K dated December 22, 2008 (File No. 0-7616),
and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.77
|
|
*1
|
|
Amended and Restated Restricted Stock Unit
Agreement, dated December 22, 2008, between
Avatar Holdings Inc. and Randy Kotler (2,500
Units; hurdle price condition: $80.86) (filed as
Exhibit 10.13 to Form 8-K dated December 22, 2008
(File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.78
|
|
*1
|
|
Amended and Restated Restricted Stock Unit
Agreement, dated December 22, 2008, between
Avatar Holdings Inc. and Randy Kotler (2,500
Units; hurdle price condition $84.71) (filed as
Exhibit 10.14 to Form 8-K dated December 22, 2008
(File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.79
|
|
*1
|
|
Amended and Restated Restricted Stock Unit
Agreement, dated December 22, 2008, between
Avatar Holdings Inc. and Randy Kotler (2,500
Units; hurdle price condition $88.56) (filed as
Exhibit 10.15 to Form 8-K dated December 22, 2008
(File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.80
|
|
*1
|
|
Amended and Restated Form of Deferred
Compensation Agreement for Non-Employee
Directors Fees (filed as Exhibit 10.97 to form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, dated
March 16, 2009 (File No. 0-7616), and
incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.81
|
|
*1
|
|
Compensation of certain named executive officers
(filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 2009, dated May 11, 2009,
(File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by
reference). |
111
Exhibit Index continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.82
|
|
|
* |
|
|
First Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of May
21, 2009, by and among Avatar Properties Inc. (Borrower), Avatar
Holdings Inc., (Guarantor), the several lenders from time to time
parties thereto (Lenders), and Wachovia Bank, National Association
(Agent and Lender) (field as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K dated May 26,
2009 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.83
|
|
|
* |
|
|
Underwriting Agreement, dated September 23, 2009, between Avatar
Holdings, Inc., Avatar Properties Inc., Frenchmans Yacht Club
Developers, LLC and Barclays Capital Inc., (filed as Exhibit 1.1 to Form
8-K dated September 23, 2009 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein
by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.84
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
First Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, between
Avatar Holdings Inc. and Patricia Kimball Fletcher, dated October 26,
2009 (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.85
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
Separation and Release Agreement, between Avatar Properties Inc., and
Jonathan Fels, dated December 29, 2009 (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsidiaries of Registrant (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer required by 18 U.S.C. Section
1350 (as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
(furnished herewith). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer required by 18 U.S.C. Section
1350 (as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
(furnished herewith). |
112