Form 10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTER REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to .
Commission file number: 001-14953
HEALTHMARKETS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
75-2044750 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification Number) |
9151 Boulevard 26, North Richland Hills, Texas 76180
(Address of principal executive offices, zip code)
(817) 255-5200
(Registrants phone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 1 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). o Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o |
Accelerated filer o |
Non-accelerated filer þ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
On October 25, 2010, the registrant had 28,418,821 outstanding shares of Class A-1 Common
Stock, $.01 Par Value, and 2,738,252 outstanding shares of Class A-2 Common Stock, $.01 Par Value.
HEALTHMARKETS, INC.
and Subsidiaries
Third Quarter 2010 Form 10-Q
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1
HEALTHMARKETS, INC.
and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities, at fair value (cost: 2010 $706,319; 2009 $742,630) |
|
$ |
758,595 |
|
|
$ |
756,180 |
|
Equity securities, at fair value (cost: 2009 $234) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
234 |
|
Trading securities, at fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,893 |
|
Short-term and other investments, at fair value (cost: 2010 $315,303; 2009 $370,676) |
|
|
316,921 |
|
|
|
371,534 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments |
|
|
1,075,516 |
|
|
|
1,137,841 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
10,066 |
|
|
|
17,406 |
|
Student loan receivables |
|
|
61,916 |
|
|
|
69,911 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
10,091 |
|
|
|
8,647 |
|
Investment income due and accrued |
|
|
11,661 |
|
|
|
10,464 |
|
Reinsurance recoverable ceded policy liabilities |
|
|
361,726 |
|
|
|
361,305 |
|
Agent and other receivables |
|
|
25,863 |
|
|
|
26,390 |
|
Deferred acquisition costs |
|
|
39,393 |
|
|
|
64,339 |
|
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $145,103 and $134,155 at
September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively) |
|
|
46,149 |
|
|
|
48,690 |
|
Goodwill and other intangible assets |
|
|
83,655 |
|
|
|
85,973 |
|
Recoverable federal income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,879 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
21,747 |
|
|
|
22,653 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,747,783 |
|
|
$ |
1,871,498 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Policy liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future policy and contract benefits |
|
$ |
456,011 |
|
|
$ |
462,217 |
|
Claims |
|
|
230,329 |
|
|
|
339,755 |
|
Unearned premiums |
|
|
37,332 |
|
|
|
46,309 |
|
Other policy liabilities |
|
|
7,711 |
|
|
|
8,247 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
44,807 |
|
|
|
65,692 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
53,522 |
|
|
|
74,929 |
|
Current and deferred federal income taxes |
|
|
65,050 |
|
|
|
51,978 |
|
Debt |
|
|
553,420 |
|
|
|
481,070 |
|
Student loan credit facility |
|
|
70,400 |
|
|
|
77,350 |
|
Net liabilities of discontinued operations |
|
|
1,725 |
|
|
|
1,752 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,520,307 |
|
|
|
1,609,299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 10) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share authorized 10,000,000 shares, none issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock, Class A-1, par value $0.01 per share authorized 90,000,000 shares,
28,418,821 issued and 28,418,821 outstanding at September 30, 2010; 27,608,371 issued and
27,608,371 outstanding at December 31, 2009. Class A-2, par value $0.01 per share
authorized 20,000,000 shares, 4,026,104 issued and 2,759,289 outstanding at September 30,
2010; 4,026,104 issued and 2,565,874 outstanding at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
324 |
|
|
|
316 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
54,228 |
|
|
|
42,342 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
32,334 |
|
|
|
3,739 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
161,571 |
|
|
|
246,427 |
|
Treasury stock, at cost (-0- Class A-1 common shares and 1,266,815 Class A-2 common
shares at September 30, 2010; -0- Class A-1 common shares and 1,460,230 Class A-2 common
shares at December 31, 2009) |
|
|
(20,981 |
) |
|
|
(30,625 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
227,476 |
|
|
|
262,199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,747,783 |
|
|
$ |
1,871,498 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements.
2
HEALTHMARKETS, INC.
and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
REVENUE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health premiums |
|
$ |
176,736 |
|
|
$ |
239,560 |
|
|
$ |
571,423 |
|
|
$ |
753,203 |
|
Life premiums and other considerations |
|
|
380 |
|
|
|
487 |
|
|
|
1,529 |
|
|
|
1,829 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
177,116 |
|
|
|
240,047 |
|
|
|
572,952 |
|
|
|
755,032 |
|
Investment income |
|
|
9,729 |
|
|
|
10,873 |
|
|
|
31,840 |
|
|
|
32,224 |
|
Commissions and other income |
|
|
18,838 |
|
|
|
15,064 |
|
|
|
49,377 |
|
|
|
47,841 |
|
Total other-than-temporary impairment losses |
|
|
(765 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(765 |
) |
|
|
(4,078 |
) |
Portion of loss recognized in other comprehensive
income (before taxes) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net impairment losses recognized in earnings |
|
|
(765 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(765 |
) |
|
|
(4,078 |
) |
Realized gains, net |
|
|
1,225 |
|
|
|
795 |
|
|
|
3,866 |
|
|
|
2,350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
206,143 |
|
|
|
266,779 |
|
|
|
657,270 |
|
|
|
833,369 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BENEFITS AND EXPENSES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits, claims, and settlement expenses |
|
|
57,605 |
|
|
|
126,042 |
|
|
|
279,353 |
|
|
|
435,721 |
|
Underwriting, acquisition, and insurance expenses |
|
|
39,765 |
|
|
|
80,867 |
|
|
|
138,432 |
|
|
|
260,143 |
|
Other expenses |
|
|
67,204 |
|
|
|
25,272 |
|
|
|
161,947 |
|
|
|
67,186 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
7,375 |
|
|
|
7,559 |
|
|
|
22,835 |
|
|
|
25,252 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
171,949 |
|
|
|
239,740 |
|
|
|
602,567 |
|
|
|
788,302 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
|
|
34,194 |
|
|
|
27,039 |
|
|
|
54,703 |
|
|
|
45,067 |
|
Federal income tax expense |
|
|
11,951 |
|
|
|
9,644 |
|
|
|
21,288 |
|
|
|
16,456 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
22,243 |
|
|
|
17,395 |
|
|
|
33,415 |
|
|
|
28,611 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations, (net of income
tax expense of $6 and $21 for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2010, respectively, and
$30 and $57 for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009, respectively) |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
22,255 |
|
|
$ |
17,450 |
|
|
$ |
33,454 |
|
|
$ |
28,717 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.75 |
|
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
|
$ |
1.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.97 |
|
Income from discontinued operations |
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share, basic |
|
$ |
0.75 |
|
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
|
$ |
1.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.73 |
|
|
$ |
0.58 |
|
|
$ |
1.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.95 |
|
Income from discontinued operations |
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share, diluted |
|
$ |
0.73 |
|
|
$ |
0.58 |
|
|
$ |
1.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements.
3
HEALTHMARKETS, INC.
and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
22,255 |
|
|
$ |
17,450 |
|
|
$ |
33,454 |
|
|
$ |
28,717 |
|
Implementation effect upon adoption of ASC 320-10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains on securities available for sale arising during the period |
|
|
14,483 |
|
|
|
38,360 |
|
|
|
43,352 |
|
|
|
65,131 |
|
Reclassification for investment (gains) losses included in net income |
|
|
(1,225 |
) |
|
|
(809 |
) |
|
|
(3,866 |
) |
|
|
2,221 |
|
Other-than-temporary impairment losses recognized in OCI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,565 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect on other comprehensive income from investment securities |
|
|
13,258 |
|
|
|
37,551 |
|
|
|
39,486 |
|
|
|
65,787 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives used in cash flow hedging during
the period |
|
|
(217 |
) |
|
|
(1,137 |
) |
|
|
(683 |
) |
|
|
(2,036 |
) |
Reclassification adjustments included in net income |
|
|
1,217 |
|
|
|
2,380 |
|
|
|
5,190 |
|
|
|
7,260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect on other comprehensive income from hedging activities |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
1,243 |
|
|
|
4,507 |
|
|
|
5,224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income before tax |
|
|
14,258 |
|
|
|
38,794 |
|
|
|
43,993 |
|
|
|
71,011 |
|
Income tax expense related to items of other comprehensive income |
|
|
4,990 |
|
|
|
13,579 |
|
|
|
15,398 |
|
|
|
24,856 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income net of tax |
|
|
9,268 |
|
|
|
25,215 |
|
|
|
28,595 |
|
|
|
46,155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
31,523 |
|
|
$ |
42,665 |
|
|
$ |
62,049 |
|
|
$ |
75,889 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements.
4
HEALTHMARKETS, INC.
and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
33,454 |
|
|
$ |
28,717 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash (used in) provided by
operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations |
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
(106 |
) |
Realized (gains) losses, net |
|
|
(3,101 |
) |
|
|
2,217 |
|
Change in deferred income taxes |
|
|
(7,087 |
) |
|
|
(681 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
17,096 |
|
|
|
22,962 |
|
Amortization of prepaid monitoring fees |
|
|
11,250 |
|
|
|
9,375 |
|
Equity based compensation expense |
|
|
10,642 |
|
|
|
5,250 |
|
Other items, net |
|
|
9,891 |
|
|
|
9,732 |
|
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment income due and accrued |
|
|
(2,212 |
) |
|
|
1,010 |
|
Due premiums |
|
|
928 |
|
|
|
1,845 |
|
Reinsurance recoverable ceded policy liabilities |
|
|
(421 |
) |
|
|
8,869 |
|
Agent and other receivables |
|
|
1,553 |
|
|
|
7,476 |
|
Deferred acquisition costs |
|
|
24,946 |
|
|
|
3,355 |
|
Prepaid monitoring fees |
|
|
(15,000 |
) |
|
|
(12,500 |
) |
Current income tax recoverable |
|
|
22,642 |
|
|
|
8,359 |
|
Policy liabilities |
|
|
(121,001 |
) |
|
|
(90,286 |
) |
Other liabilities and accrued expenses |
|
|
(18,327 |
) |
|
|
(6,514 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash used in continuing operations |
|
|
(34,786 |
) |
|
|
(920 |
) |
Cash (used in) provided by discontinued operations |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
(97 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
|
(34,774 |
) |
|
|
(1,017 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Student loan receivables |
|
|
6,565 |
|
|
|
4,763 |
|
Securities available for sale |
|
|
120,863 |
|
|
|
59,069 |
|
Short-term and other investments, net |
|
|
54,715 |
|
|
|
(127,140 |
) |
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(8,459 |
) |
|
|
(2,170 |
) |
Proceeds from subsidiaries sold, net of cash disposed of $437 in 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(440 |
) |
Intangible assets acquired |
|
|
(297 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions net of cash acquired |
|
|
252 |
|
|
|
|
|
Change in restricted cash |
|
|
1,742 |
|
|
|
471 |
|
Increase in agent receivables |
|
|
(6,421 |
) |
|
|
(276 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash (used in) provided by continuing operations |
|
|
168,960 |
|
|
|
(65,723 |
) |
Cash (used in) provided by discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities |
|
|
168,960 |
|
|
|
(65,723 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of student loan credit facility |
|
|
(6,950 |
) |
|
|
(7,200 |
) |
Decrease in investment products |
|
|
(4,144 |
) |
|
|
(4,410 |
) |
Change in cash overdraft |
|
|
(7,055 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from shares issued to agent plans and other |
|
|
6,099 |
|
|
|
6,340 |
|
Purchases of treasury stock |
|
|
(8,675 |
) |
|
|
(18,279 |
) |
Dividends paid |
|
|
(119,514 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Excess tax reduction from equity based compensation |
|
|
(1,287 |
) |
|
|
(1,478 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash used in continuing operations |
|
|
(141,526 |
) |
|
|
(25,027 |
) |
Cash (used in) provided by discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(141,526 |
) |
|
|
(25,027 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(7,340 |
) |
|
|
(91,767 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
17,406 |
|
|
|
100,339 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period in continuing operations |
|
$ |
10,066 |
|
|
$ |
8,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes paid |
|
$ |
9,168 |
|
|
$ |
13,505 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid |
|
$ |
20,823 |
|
|
$ |
29,142 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements.
5
HEALTHMARKETS, INC.
and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The accompanying consolidated condensed financial statements for HealthMarkets, Inc. (the
Company or HealthMarkets) and its subsidiaries have been prepared in accordance with United
States generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for interim financial information and the
instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, such financial statements
do not include all of the information and notes required by GAAP for complete financial statements.
In the opinion of management, these financial statements include all adjustments, consisting of
normal recurring adjustments and accruals, necessary for the fair presentation of the consolidated
condensed balance sheets, statements of income, statements of comprehensive income and statements
of cash flows for the periods presented. The accompanying December 31, 2009 consolidated condensed
balance sheet was derived from audited consolidated financial statements, but does not include all
disclosures required by GAAP for annual financial statement purposes. Preparing financial
statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts that are
reported in the financial statements and the accompanying disclosures. Although these estimates are
based on managements knowledge of current events and actions that HealthMarkets may undertake in
the future, actual results may differ materially from the estimates. Operating results for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results that
may be expected for the full year ending December 31, 2010. We have evaluated subsequent events for
recognition or disclosure through the date we filed this Form 10-Q with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the SEC). For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements
and notes thereto, included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2009.
Concentrations
Through its Commercial Health Division (formerly the Self-Employed Agency Division), the
Companys insurance subsidiaries provide health insurance products in 41 states and the District of
Columbia. As is the case with many of HealthMarkets competitors in this market, a substantial
portion of the Companys insurance subsidiaries products are issued to members of various
independent membership associations that act as the master policyholder for such products. In 2010,
the two principal membership associations in the self-employed market through which the Companys
health insurance products were made available were the Alliance for Affordable Services (AAS) and
Americans for Financial Security (AFS). While the Company believes that its insurance
subsidiaries are providing association group coverage in full compliance with applicable law,
changes in the relationship with the membership associations and/or changes in the laws and
regulations governing association group insurance could have a material adverse impact on the
Companys financial condition and results of operations. During the nine months ended September
30, 2010, the Company issued approximately 39% and 12%, of its new policies through AAS and AFS,
respectively. The remaining 49% were individual policies not issued through a membership
association. In the third quarter the Company discontinued marketing its health insurance products
in all but a limited number of states in which Insphere, a subsidiary, does not currently have
access to third-party health insurance products. The Company will continue to focus its efforts on
selling products underwritten by third-party carriers as well as marketing its own supplemental
insurance products.
Additionally, during the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company generated
approximately 56% of its health premium revenue from new and existing business from the following
10 states:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage |
|
California |
|
|
14 |
% |
Texas |
|
|
7 |
% |
Florida |
|
|
6 |
% |
Massachusetts |
|
|
6 |
% |
Illinois |
|
|
5 |
% |
Maine |
|
|
5 |
% |
Washington |
|
|
4 |
% |
North Carolina |
|
|
3 |
% |
Pennsylvania |
|
|
3 |
% |
Georgia |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56 |
% |
6
2010 Change in Estimate Amortization of Intangible Assets
On January 1, 2010, the Company re-evaluated the amortization period related to an intangible
asset recorded in the Commercial Health Division. See Note 6 of Notes to Consolidated Condensed
Financial Statements.
Reclassification
Certain amounts in the 2009 financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the 2010
financial statement presentation.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In October 2010, the Financial Account Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting
Standards Update (ASU) 2010-26, Financial ServicesInsurance (Topic 944): Accounting for Costs
Associated with Acquiring or Renewing Insurance Contracts (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues
Task Force) providing guidance modifying the definition of the types of costs incurred by insurance
entities that can be capitalized in the acquisition of new and renewal contracts. The guidance
specifies that incremental direct costs of contract acquisition attributable to successful efforts
should be included as deferred acquisition costs. The guidance also specifies that deferred
acquisition costs include advertising costs only when the direct-response advertising accounting
criteria are met. The new guidance is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15,
2011 and should be applied prospectively, with retrospective application permitted. If application
of the guidance would result in the capitalization of acquisition costs that had not previously
been capitalized prior to adoption, the entity may elect not to capitalize those additional costs.
The Company is in process of evaluating the impact of adoption on the Companys results of
operations and financial position.
In July 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-20, Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing
Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses (ASU 2010-20). ASU 2010-20 provides enhanced
disclosures related to the credit quality of financing receivables and the allowance for credit
losses, and provides that new and existing disclosures should be disaggregated based on how an
entity develops its allowance for credit losses and how it manages credit exposures. Under the
provisions of ASU 2010-20, additional disclosures required for financing receivables include
information regarding the aging of past due receivables, credit quality indicators, and
modifications of financing receivables. The provisions of ASU 2010-20 are effective for periods
ending after December 15, 2010, with the exception of the amendments to the rollforward of the
allowance for credit losses and the disclosures about modifications which are effective for periods
beginning after December 15, 2010. Comparative disclosures are required only for periods ending
subsequent to initial adoption. The Company is currently assessing the effects of adopting the
provisions of ASU 2010-20.
In April 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-15, How Investments Held through Separate Accounts
Affect an Insurers Consolidation Analysis of Those Investments, (ASU 2010-15). ASU 2010-15
clarifies that insurance companies should not consider separate account interests held for the
benefit of policy holders in an investment to be the insurers interests and that the Company
should not combine those interests with its general account interest in the same investment when
assessing the investment for consolidation, unless the separate account interests are held for the
benefit of a related party policy holder. Additionally, ASU provides guidance on how an insurer
should consolidate an investment fund in situations in which the insurer concludes that
consolidation is required. ASU 2010-15 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after
December 15, 2010. The Company does not anticipate that the adoption of ASU 2010-15 will have a
material impact on the Companys financial position or results of operations.
During the third quarter of 2010, the Company adopted ASU No. 2010-11, Derivatives and Hedging
(Topic 815) Scope Exception Related to Embedded Credit Derivatives, (ASU 2010-11). ASU 2010-11
clarifies the scope exception for embedded credit derivative features related to the transfer of
credit risk in the form of subordination of one financial instrument to another. This standard also
addresses how to determine which embedded credit derivative features, including those in
collateralized debt obligations and synthetic collateralized debt obligations, are considered to be
embedded derivatives that should not be analyzed for potential bifurcation and separate accounting.
Implementation of this standard did not have a material impact on the Companys financial position
or results of operations.
On January 1, 2010, the Company adopted ASU No. 2009-17, Consolidations: Improvements to
Financial Reporting by Enterprises Involved with Variable Interest Entities (ASU 2009-17), which
provides amendments to FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 810, Consolidation. ASU
2009-17 modifies financial reporting for variable interest entities (VIEs). Under this guidance,
companies are required to perform a periodic analysis to determine whether their variable interest
must be consolidated by the Company. Additionally, Companies must disclose significant judgments
and assumptions made when determining whether it must consolidate a VIE. Upon adoption, the Company
determined that Grapevine Finance, LLC (Grapevine) is a VIE and, as such, the Company began
consolidating the activities of Grapevine on January 1, 2010. See Note 5 of Notes to Consolidated
Condensed Financial Statements.
7
On January 1, 2010, the Company adopted ASU No. 2009-16, Accounting for Transfers of Financial
Assets and Servicing Assets and Liabilities (ASU 2009-16), which provides amendments to FASB ASC
Topic 860, Transfers and Servicing (ASC 860). ASU 2009-16 incorporates the amendments to SFAS No.
140 made by SFAS No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assetsan amendment of SFAS No.
140, into the FASB ASC. ASU 2009-16 provides greater transparency about transfers of financial
assets and requires that all servicing assets and servicing liabilities be initially measured at
fair value. Additionally, ASU 2009-16 eliminates the concept of a non-consolidated qualifying
special-purpose entity (QSPE) and removes the exception from applying FASB Interpretation No. 46
(revised December 2003), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, to QSPEs. Upon adoption, the
Company was no longer permitted to account for Grapevine as a QSPE, and instead was required to
evaluate its activities under ASU 2009-17. See Note 5 of Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial
Statements.
During the first quarter of 2010, the Company adopted ASC Update 2009-12, Fair Value
Measurements and Disclosures Investments in Certain Entities that Calculate Net Asset Value per
Share (or Its Equivalent) (ASC 2009-12), which provides amendments to Subtopic 820, Fair Value
Measurements and Disclosures (ASC 820), for the fair value measurement of investments in certain
entities that calculate net asset value per share (or its equivalent). See Note 2 of Notes to
Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements for additional disclosures required under ASC 2009-12.
During the first quarter of 2010, the Company adopted ASC Update 2010-06, Fair Value
Measurements and Disclosures: Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements (ASU 2010-06).
ASU 2010-06 amends ASC Subtopic 820-10 to require new disclosures around the transfers in and out
of Level 1 and Level 2 and around activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. Such guidance also
provides amendments to ASC 820 which clarifies existing disclosures on the level of disaggregation,
inputs and valuation techniques. See Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements
for additional fair value measurement disclosures.
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASC Update 2010-09, Subsequent Events: Amendments to Certain
Recognition and Disclosure Requirements (ASU 2010-09), which amends ASC Topic 855, Subsequent
Events. Such guidance requires an entity to evaluate subsequent events through the date that the
financial statements are issued. ASU 2010-09 is effective for interim and annual periods ending
after June 15, 2010. The Company had previously evaluated subsequent events through the date the
financial statements are issued and will continue to do so under this guidance.
Impact on Medical Loss Ratio from Update of Completion Factors
The majority of the Companys claim liabilities are estimated using the developmental method,
which involves the use of completion factors for most incurral months, supplemented with additional
estimation techniques, such as loss ratio estimates, in the most recent incurral months. This
method applies completion factors to claim payments in order to estimate the ultimate amount of the
claim. These completion factors are derived from historical experience and are dependent on the
incurred dates of the claim, as well as the dates a payment is made against the claim.
The loss ratio for the quarter reflects an update to the completion factors used at the end of
the third quarter of 2010 to reflect more recent patterns of claim payments. Through September
2010, the Company has seen an ongoing decrease in the time period from incurral to payment of a
claim, resulting in higher completion factors and lower reserves. In response to these trends, in
the third quarter, the Company used more recent experience to develop the completion factors,
resulting in a decrease in claim liabilities of $30.6 million recognized during the three months
ended September 30, 2010. The Company will continue to evaluate and update completion factors on an
ongoing basis, as appropriate, and will evaluate the impact, if any, that Health Care Reform
Legislation may have on the completion factors.
The decrease in loss ratio for the quarter also reflects the Companys refinement of a
previously estimated claim liability, established in the fourth quarter of 2009, arising from a
review of claim processing for state mandated benefits. As a result of this refinement, during the
three months ended September 30, 2010, the Company recognized a decrease in claim liabilities of
$15.9 million.
2. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
In accordance with ASC 820, the Company categorizes its investments and certain other assets
and liabilities recorded at fair value into a three-level fair value hierarchy as follows:
8
|
|
|
Level 1 Unadjusted quoted market prices for identical assets or liabilities in active
markets which are accessible by the Company. |
|
|
|
|
Level 2 Observable prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities.
Prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets which are not active.
Directly observable market inputs for substantially the full term of the asset or
liability, such as interest rates and yield curves at commonly quoted intervals,
volatilities, prepayment speeds, default rates, and credit spreads. Market inputs that are
not directly observable but are derived from or corroborated by observable market data. |
|
|
|
|
Level 3 Unobservable inputs based on the Companys own judgment as to assumptions a
market participant would use, including inputs derived from extrapolation and interpolation
that are not corroborated by observable market data. |
The Company evaluates the various types of securities in its investment portfolio to determine
the appropriate level in the fair value hierarchy based upon trading activity and the observability
of market inputs. The Company employs control processes to validate the reasonableness of the fair
value estimates of its assets and liabilities, including those estimates based on prices and quotes
obtained from independent third party sources. The Companys procedures generally include, but are
not limited to, initial and ongoing evaluation of methodologies used by independent third parties
and monthly analytical reviews of the prices against current pricing trends and statistics.
Where possible, the Company utilizes quoted market prices to measure fair value. For
investments that have quoted market prices in active markets, the Company uses the quoted market
price as fair value and includes these prices in the amounts disclosed in Level 1 of the hierarchy.
When quoted market prices in active markets are unavailable, the Company determines fair values
using various valuation techniques and models based on a range of observable market inputs
including pricing models, quoted market price of publicly traded securities with similar duration
and yield, time value, yield curve, prepayment speeds, default rates and discounted cash flow. In
most cases, these estimates are determined based on independent third party valuation information,
and the amounts are disclosed in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. Generally, the Company
obtains a single price or quote per instrument from independent third parties to assist in
establishing the fair value of these investments.
If quoted market prices and independent third party valuation information are unavailable, the
Company produces an estimate of fair value based on internally developed valuation techniques,
which, depending on the level of observable market inputs, will render the fair value estimate as
Level 2 or Level 3. On occasions when pricing service data is unavailable, the Company may rely on
bid/ask spreads from dealers in determining the fair value. When dealer quotations are used to
assist in establishing the fair value, the Company generally obtains one quote per instrument. The
quotes obtained from dealers or brokers are generally non-binding. When dealer quotations are used,
the Company uses the mid-mark as fair value. When broker or dealer quotations are used for
valuation or price verification, greater priority is given to executable quotes. As part of the
price verification process, valuations based on quotes are corroborated by comparison both to other
quotes and to recent trading activity in the same or similar instruments.
To the extent the Company determines that a price or quote is inconsistent with actual trading
activity observed in that investment or similar investments, or if the Company does not think the
quote is reflective of the market value for the investment, the Company will internally develop a
fair value using this observable market information and disclose the occurrence of this
circumstance.
In accordance with ASC 820, the Company has categorized its available for sale securities into
a three level fair value hierarchy based on the priority of inputs to the valuation techniques. The
fair values of investments disclosed in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy include money market
funds and certain U.S. government securities, while the investments disclosed in Level 2 include
the majority of the Companys fixed income investments. In cases where there is limited activity or
less transparency around inputs to the valuation, the Company classifies the fair value estimates
within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
As of September 30, 2010, all of the Companys investments classified within Level 2 and Level
3 of the fair value hierarchy are valued based on quotes or prices obtained from independent third
parties, except for $202.4 million of Corporate debt and other classified as Level 2, and $1.0
million of Commercial-backed investments classified as Level 3. The Corporate debt and other
investments classified as Level 2 noted above includes $103.4 million of an investment grade
corporate bond issued by UnitedHealth Group Inc. that was received as consideration for the sale of
the Companys former Student Insurance Division in December 2006 and $90.2 million of an investment
grade corporate bond received from a unit of the CIGNA Corporation as consideration for the receipt
of the former Star HRG assets (see Note 5 of Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements).
9
Fair Value Hierarchy on a Recurring Basis
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are categorized in the
tables below based upon the lowest level of significant input to the valuations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets at Fair Value at September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
U.S. and U.S. Government agencies |
|
$ |
4,650 |
|
|
$ |
52,131 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
56,781 |
|
Corporate debt and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
407,775 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
407,775 |
|
Collateralized debt obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential-backed issued by agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
79,548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79,548 |
|
Commercial-backed issued by agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,718 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,718 |
|
Residential-backed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,847 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,847 |
|
Commercial-backed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,445 |
|
|
|
1,023 |
|
|
|
46,468 |
|
Asset-backed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,813 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,813 |
|
Municipals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
147,645 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
147,645 |
|
Other invested assets (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,645 |
|
|
|
1,645 |
|
Short-term investments (2) |
|
|
292,641 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
292,641 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
297,291 |
|
|
$ |
752,922 |
|
|
$ |
2,668 |
|
|
$ |
1,052,881 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Investments in entities that calculate net asset value per share |
|
(2) |
|
Amount excludes $22.6 million of short-term other investments which are not
subject to fair value measurement. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities at Fair Value at September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,493 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,493 |
|
Agent and employee plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,867 |
|
|
|
5,867 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,493 |
|
|
$ |
5,867 |
|
|
$ |
9,360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets at Fair Value at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
U.S. and U.S. Government agencies |
|
$ |
8,943 |
|
|
$ |
40,847 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
49,790 |
|
Corporate debt and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
344,509 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
344,509 |
|
Collateralized debt obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,905 |
|
|
|
2,905 |
|
Residential-backed issued by agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
105,898 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105,898 |
|
Commercial-backed issued by agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,710 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,710 |
|
Residential-backed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,882 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,882 |
|
Commercial-backed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,715 |
|
|
|
1,297 |
|
|
|
46,012 |
|
Asset-backed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,337 |
|
|
|
465 |
|
|
|
15,802 |
|
Municipals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
171,434 |
|
|
|
7,238 |
|
|
|
178,672 |
|
Trading securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,893 |
|
|
|
9,893 |
|
Put options (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
657 |
|
|
|
657 |
|
Short-term and other investments (2) |
|
|
344,011 |
|
|
|
6,164 |
|
|
|
937 |
|
|
|
351,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
352,954 |
|
|
$ |
741,496 |
|
|
$ |
23,392 |
|
|
$ |
1,117,842 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Included in Other assets on the consolidated balance sheet. |
|
(2) |
|
Amount excludes $20.7 million of short-term other investments and equity
securities which are not subject to fair value measurement. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities at Fair Value at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
8,766 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
8,766 |
|
Agent and employee plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,651 |
|
|
|
16,651 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
8,766 |
|
|
$ |
16,651 |
|
|
$ |
25,417 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for certain assets and
liabilities of the Company measured at fair value on a recurring basis, including the general
classification of such assets pursuant to the valuation hierarchy.
Fixed Income Investments
Available for sale investments
The Companys fixed income investments include investments in U.S. treasury securities, U.S.
government agency bonds, corporate bonds, mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities, and
municipal securities and bonds.
10
The Company estimates the fair value of its U.S. treasury securities using unadjusted quoted
market prices, and accordingly, discloses these investments in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.
The fair values of the majority of non-U.S. treasury securities held by the Company are determined
based on observable market inputs provided by independent third party valuation information. The
market inputs utilized in the pricing evaluation include but are not limited to, benchmark yields,
reported trades, broker/dealer quotes, issuer spreads, two-sided markets, benchmark securities,
bids, offers, reference data, and industry and economic events. The Company classifies the fair
value estimates based on these observable market inputs within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
Investments classified within Level 2 consist of U.S. government agencies bonds, corporate bonds,
mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities, and municipal bonds.
The Company also holds a fixed income commercial asset-backed investment for which it
estimates the fair value using an internal pricing matrix with some unobservable inputs that are
significant to the valuation. Consequently, the lack of transparency in the inputs and availability
of independent third party pricing information for this investment resulted in its fair value being
classified within the Level 3 of the hierarchy. As of September 30, 2010, the fair value of such
commercial asset-backed security which represents approximately 0.1% of the Companys total fixed
income investments is reflected within the Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
Trading securities & Put Options
Prior to June 30, 2010, the Company held fixed income trading securities which consisted of
auction rate securities, for which the fair value was determined based on unobservable inputs.
Accordingly, the fair value of this asset was reflected within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
The put options that the Company owned were directly related to agreements the Company entered
into with UBS during 2008 to facilitate the repurchase of certain auction rate municipal
securities. The options were carried at fair value, which was related to the fair value of the
auction rate securities, and were recorded in Other assets on the consolidated condensed balance
sheets. The Company accounted for such put options in accordance with ASC 320, Investments Debt
and Equity Securities, which provided a fair value option election that permits an entity to elect
fair value as the initial and subsequent measurement attribute for certain financial assets and
liabilities on an instrument by instrument basis.
During 2009, the Company redeemed $4.6 million of its auction rate securities with UBS at par.
At December 31, 2009, the Company held auction rate securities with a face value of $10.6 million.
These remaining auction rate securities were redeemed by UBS at par on June 30, 2010.
Other invested assets
The Companys other invested assets consist of one alternative investment that owns a
portfolio of collateralized debt obligation equity investments managed by a third party management
group. The Company calculates the fair market value of such investment using the net asset value
per share, which is determined based on unobservable inputs. Accordingly, the fair value of this
asset is reflected within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
The Company has committed to fund $5.0 million to such equity investment, of which the entire
amount has been funded to date. There are no redemption opportunities, and the fund will terminate
when the underlying collateralized debt obligation deals mature.
Short-term investments
The Companys short-term investments primarily consist of highly liquid money market funds,
which are reflected within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.
Derivatives
The Companys derivative instruments are valued utilizing valuation models that primarily use
market observable inputs and are traded in the markets where quoted market prices are not readily
available, and accordingly, these instruments are reflected within the Level 2 of the fair value
hierarchy.
11
Agent and Employee Stock Plans
The Company accounts for its agent and certain employee stock plan liabilities based on the
Companys share price at the end of each reporting period. The Companys share price at the end of
each reporting period is based on the prevailing fair value as determined by the Companys Board of
Directors (see Note 11 of Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements). The Company
largely uses unobservable inputs in deriving the fair value of its share price and the value is,
therefore, reflected in Level 3 of the hierarchy.
Changes in Level 3 Assets and Liabilities
The tables below summarize the change in balance sheet carrying values associated with Level 3
financial instruments and agent and employee stock plans for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2010.
Changes in Level 3 Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value For The Three Months Ended September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Payments |
|
|
Realized |
|
|
Transfer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning |
|
|
Gains or |
|
|
and |
|
|
Gains or |
|
|
in/(out) of |
|
|
Ending |
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
(Losses) |
|
|
Issuances, Net |
|
|
(Losses)(1) |
|
|
Level 3, Net |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateralized debt obligations |
|
$ |
2,202 |
|
|
$ |
(116 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,541 |
) |
|
$ |
(545 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Commercial-backed |
|
|
1,117 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(92 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,023 |
|
Asset-backed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Put options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other invested assets |
|
|
1,522 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,645 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,841 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
(1,633 |
) |
|
$ |
(545 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,668 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agent and employee stock plans |
|
$ |
5,772 |
|
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
$ |
70 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5,867 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in Level 3 Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value For The Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Payments |
|
|
Realized |
|
|
Transfer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning |
|
|
Gains or |
|
|
and |
|
|
Gains or |
|
|
in/(out) of |
|
|
Ending |
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
(Losses) |
|
|
Issuances, Net |
|
|
(Losses)(1) |
|
|
Level 3, Net |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateralized debt obligations |
|
$ |
2,905 |
|
|
$ |
(835 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,525 |
) |
|
$ |
(545 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Commercial-backed |
|
|
1,297 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(269 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,023 |
|
Asset-backed |
|
|
465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(465 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Municipals |
|
|
7,238 |
|
|
|
762 |
|
|
|
(8,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading securities |
|
|
9,893 |
|
|
|
657 |
|
|
|
(10,550 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Put options |
|
|
657 |
|
|
|
(657 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other invested assets |
|
|
937 |
|
|
|
755 |
|
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,645 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
23,392 |
|
|
$ |
677 |
|
|
$ |
(20,391 |
) |
|
$ |
(545 |
) |
|
$ |
(465 |
) |
|
$ |
2,668 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agent and employee stock plans |
|
$ |
16,651 |
|
|
$ |
(3,441 |
) |
|
$ |
(7,343 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5,867 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Realized losses for the period are included in Realized gains, net on the Companys
consolidated condensed statement of income (loss). |
During the three months ended September 30, 2010, there were sales and redemptions of
Level 3 financial instruments in the amount of $1.6 million, of which $95,000 is classified as
Commercial-backed, and $1.5 million is classified as Collateralized Debt Obligations, in the
table above. The Company had a net settlement gain of
$3,000 during the three months ended September 30, 2010, all of which is classified as
Commercial-backed in the table above. The Company had no purchases and no issuances of Level 3
financial instruments during the third quarter of 2010.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, there were sales and redemptions of Level 3
financial instruments in the amount of $20.4 million, of which $1.5 million is classified as
Collateralized Debt Obligations, $280,000 is classified as Commercial-backed, $8.0 million is
classified as Municipals, and $10.6 million is classified as Trading securities in the table
above. The Company had a net settlement loss of $(20,000) during the nine months ended September
30, 2010, of which $(47,000) is classified as Other invested assets, $16,000 is classified as
Collateralized debt obligations and $11,000 is classified as Commercial-backed in the table
above. The Company had no purchases and no issuances of Level 3 financial instruments during the
first nine months of 2010.
During the three months ended September 30, 2010, the Company did not transfer securities
between Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company
transferred one security out of Level 3 to Level 2. Prior to 2010, the Company valued this
security internally; however, during the first quarter of 2010, the security began being priced by
a pricing service. Furthermore, the Company determined there were adequate observable inputs that
were sufficient for pricing the security.
12
Changes in Level 3 Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Payments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning |
|
|
Gains or |
|
|
and |
|
|
Realized |
|
|
in/(out) of |
|
|
Ending |
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
(Losses) |
|
|
Issuances, Net |
|
|
Losses(1) |
|
|
Level 3, Net |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
|
In Thousands |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateralized debt obligations |
|
$ |
2,563 |
|
|
$ |
533 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,096 |
|
Commercial backed |
|
|
1,424 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
(88 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,388 |
|
Asset backed |
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
445 |
|
Municipals |
|
|
7,301 |
|
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,270 |
|
Trading securities |
|
|
14,259 |
|
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
(250 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,956 |
|
Put options |
|
|
741 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
794 |
|
Other invested assets |
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
365 |
|
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
440 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
26,789 |
|
|
$ |
1,004 |
|
|
$ |
(404 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
27,389 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agent and employee stock plans |
|
$ |
13,184 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,798 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
14,982 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in Level 3 Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Payments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning |
|
|
Gains or |
|
|
and |
|
|
Realized |
|
|
in/(out) of |
|
|
Ending |
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
(Losses) |
|
|
Issuances, Net |
|
|
Losses(1) |
|
|
Level 3, Net |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
|
In Thousands |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateralized debt obligations |
|
$ |
2,585 |
|
|
$ |
1,906 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(1,395 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,096 |
|
Commercial backed |
|
|
1,494 |
|
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
(255 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,388 |
|
Asset backed |
|
|
252 |
|
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
445 |
|
Municipals |
|
|
6,539 |
|
|
|
731 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,270 |
|
Trading securities |
|
|
11,937 |
|
|
|
2,369 |
|
|
|
(350 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,956 |
|
Put options |
|
|
3,163 |
|
|
|
(2,369 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
794 |
|
Other invested assets |
|
|
476 |
|
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
(294 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
440 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
26,446 |
|
|
$ |
3,237 |
|
|
$ |
(899 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,395 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
27,389 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agent and employee stock plans |
|
$ |
18,158 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(3,176 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
14,982 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Realized losses for the period are included in Realized gains on the Companys
consolidated condensed statement of income (loss). |
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Company had no purchases
and no issuances of Level 3 financial instruments. Additionally, the Company did not transfer
securities between Level 1,
Level 2 and Level 3.
Investments not reported at fair value
Other investments consists of investments in equity investees, which are accounted for under
the equity method of accounting on the Companys consolidated condensed balance sheet at cost.
3. INVESTMENTS
The Companys investments consist of the following at September 30, 2010 and December 31,
2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Securities available for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities |
|
$ |
758,595 |
|
|
$ |
756,180 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
234 |
|
Trading securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,893 |
|
Short-term and other investments |
|
|
316,921 |
|
|
|
371,534 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments |
|
$ |
1,075,516 |
|
|
$ |
1,137,841 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
Available for sale fixed maturities are reported at fair value which was derived as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Non-credit Loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Recognized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
in OCI |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
U.S. and U.S. Government agencies |
|
$ |
55,384 |
|
|
$ |
1,403 |
|
|
$ |
(6 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
56,781 |
|
Collateralized debt obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential-backed issued by agencies |
|
|
75,248 |
|
|
|
4,307 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
79,548 |
|
Commercial-backed issued by agencies |
|
|
8,150 |
|
|
|
568 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,718 |
|
Residential-backed |
|
|
2,758 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,847 |
|
Commercial-backed |
|
|
43,918 |
|
|
|
2,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,468 |
|
Asset-backed |
|
|
8,648 |
|
|
|
451 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(281 |
) |
|
|
8,813 |
|
Corporate bonds and municipals |
|
|
433,817 |
|
|
|
32,588 |
|
|
|
(1,219 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
465,186 |
|
Other |
|
|
78,396 |
|
|
|
11,838 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,234 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturities |
|
$ |
706,319 |
|
|
$ |
53,800 |
|
|
$ |
(1,243 |
) |
|
$ |
(281 |
) |
|
$ |
758,595 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Non-credit Loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Recognized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
in OCI |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
U.S. and U.S. Government agencies |
|
$ |
48,600 |
|
|
$ |
1,229 |
|
|
$ |
(39 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
49,790 |
|
Collateralized debt obligations |
|
|
2,070 |
|
|
|
990 |
|
|
|
(155 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,905 |
|
Residential-backed issued by agencies |
|
|
102,497 |
|
|
|
3,580 |
|
|
|
(179 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
105,898 |
|
Commercial-backed issued by agencies |
|
|
8,337 |
|
|
|
373 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,710 |
|
Residential-backed |
|
|
3,934 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,882 |
|
Commercial-backed |
|
|
45,054 |
|
|
|
998 |
|
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,012 |
|
Asset-backed |
|
|
16,176 |
|
|
|
306 |
|
|
|
(399 |
) |
|
|
(281 |
) |
|
|
15,802 |
|
Corporate bonds and municipals |
|
|
509,862 |
|
|
|
14,626 |
|
|
|
(6,474 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
518,014 |
|
Other |
|
|
6,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(933 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturities |
|
$ |
742,630 |
|
|
$ |
22,104 |
|
|
$ |
(8,273 |
) |
|
$ |
(281 |
) |
|
$ |
756,180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amortized cost and fair value of available for sale fixed maturities at September 30,
2010, by contractual maturity, are set forth in the table below. Fixed maturities subject to early
or unscheduled prepayments have been included based upon their contractual maturity dates. Actual
maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or
prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Maturity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One year or less |
|
$ |
36,460 |
|
|
$ |
37,218 |
|
Over 1 year through 5 years |
|
|
174,571 |
|
|
|
184,640 |
|
Over 5 years through 10 years |
|
|
218,229 |
|
|
|
236,569 |
|
Over 10 years |
|
|
138,337 |
|
|
|
153,774 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
567,597 |
|
|
|
612,201 |
|
Mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities |
|
|
138,722 |
|
|
|
146,394 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturities |
|
$ |
706,319 |
|
|
$ |
758,595 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements for additional
disclosures on fair value measurements.
A summary of net investment income sources is set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Fixed maturities |
|
$ |
8,559 |
|
|
$ |
9,290 |
|
|
$ |
27,160 |
|
|
$ |
28,980 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
Short-term and other investments |
|
|
390 |
|
|
|
273 |
|
|
|
1,866 |
|
|
|
(937 |
) |
Agent receivables |
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
613 |
|
|
|
857 |
|
|
|
1,959 |
|
Student loan interest income |
|
|
1,030 |
|
|
|
1,149 |
|
|
|
3,153 |
|
|
|
3,625 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,142 |
|
|
|
11,344 |
|
|
|
33,036 |
|
|
|
33,663 |
|
Less investment expenses |
|
|
413 |
|
|
|
471 |
|
|
|
1,196 |
|
|
|
1,439 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9,729 |
|
|
$ |
10,873 |
|
|
$ |
31,840 |
|
|
$ |
32,224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
Realized Gains and Losses
Realized gains and losses on sales of investments are recognized in net income on the specific
identification basis and include write downs on those investments deemed to have other than
temporary declines in fair values. Gains and losses on trading securities are reported in Realized
gains, net on the consolidated condensed statements of income.
Fixed maturities
Proceeds from the sale and call of investments in fixed maturities were $32.0 million and
$109.7 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively, and $38.2
million and $52.6 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively.
Proceeds from maturities, sinking and principal reductions amounted to $8.8 million and $38.5
million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively, and $27.5 million and
$62.9 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively. During the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company realized gross gains of $1.2 million
and $3.9, respectively, on the sale and call of fixed maturity investments. During the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Company realized gross gains of $809,000 and $1.9
million, respectively, on the sale and call of fixed maturity investments. The company realized no
gross losses during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 on the sale or call
of fixed maturity investments.
Equity securities
The Company realized no gross gains on equity securities during the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2010. The Company realized no gross losses for 3 months ended September 30,
2010 and a gross loss of $4,000 for nine months ended September 30, 2010 on equity securities. The
Company realized no gross gains and no gross losses on equity securities during the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2009.
Trading securities and Put options
The Company accounted for certain municipal auction rate securities as trading securities. In
2008, the Company entered into an agreement with UBS to facilitate the repurchase of certain
auction rate municipal securities. At such time, the Company received put options. Any gain or loss
recognized on the trading securities was offset by the same gain or loss on the put options. During
2009, the Company redeemed $4.6 million of its auction rate securities with UBS at par. At December
31, 2009, the Company held auction rate securities with a face value of $10.6 million. The
remaining auction rate securities were redeemed by UBS at par on June 30, 2010.
Other than temporary impairment (OTTI)
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company recognized an OTTI loss
on one security in the amount of $765,000. The Company recognized no OTTI losses during the three
months ended September 30, 2009 and recognized $4.1 million of OTTI losses during the nine months
ended September 30, 2009 which were deemed to be other-than-temporary reductions. All of the 2010
and 2009 OTTI losses were attributable to credit losses and, as such, were recorded in Net
impairment losses recognized in earnings on the consolidated condensed statement of income.
Set forth below is a summary of cumulative OTTI losses on debt securities held by the Company
at September 30, 2010, a portion of which have been recognized in Net impairment losses recognized
in earnings on the consolidated condensed statement of income and a portion of which have been
recognized in Accumulated other comprehensive income on the consolidated condensed balance sheet:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reductions for |
|
|
|
|
Cumulative OTTI |
|
|
|
|
|
Additions for OTTI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
increases in cash |
|
|
Cumulative OTTI |
|
credit losses |
|
Additions to OTTI |
|
|
securities where |
|
|
|
|
|
|
flows expected to |
|
|
credit losses |
|
recognized for |
|
securities where no |
|
|
credit losses have |
|
|
Reductions for |
|
|
be collected that |
|
|
recognized for |
|
securities |
|
credit losses were |
|
|
been recognized |
|
|
securities sold |
|
|
are recognized over |
|
|
securities still |
|
still held at |
|
recognized prior to |
|
|
prior to |
|
|
during the period |
|
|
the remaining life |
|
|
held at |
|
January 1, 2010 |
|
January 1, 2010 |
|
|
January 1, 2010 |
|
|
(Realized) |
|
|
of the security |
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 12,670 |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
765 |
|
|
$ |
(9,315 |
) |
|
$ |
(16 |
) |
|
$ |
4,104 |
|
15
Unrealized Gains and Losses
Fixed maturities
Set forth below is a summary of gross unrealized losses in its fixed maturities as of
September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
Unrealized Loss |
|
|
Unrealized Loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than 12 Months |
|
|
12 Months or Longer |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
Description of Securities |
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
U.S. and U.S. Government agencies |
|
$ |
2,495 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,495 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
Collateralized debt obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential-backed issued by agencies |
|
|
5,164 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
2,204 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
7,368 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Commercial-backed issued by agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential-backed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
326 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
326 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Commercial-backed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset-backed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,974 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
1,974 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Corporate bonds and municipals |
|
|
2,177 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
27,698 |
|
|
|
1,201 |
|
|
|
29,875 |
|
|
|
1,219 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
9,836 |
|
|
$ |
29 |
|
|
$ |
32,202 |
|
|
$ |
1,214 |
|
|
$ |
42,038 |
|
|
$ |
1,243 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Unrealized Loss |
|
|
Unrealized Loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than 12 Months |
|
|
12 Months or Longer |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
Description of Securities |
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
U.S. and U.S. Government agencies |
|
$ |
3,917 |
|
|
$ |
39 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,917 |
|
|
$ |
39 |
|
Collateralized debt obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
685 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
685 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
Residential-backed issued by agencies |
|
|
23,585 |
|
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,585 |
|
|
|
179 |
|
Commercial-backed issued by agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential-backed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,128 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
3,128 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
Commercial-backed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,887 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
7,887 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
Asset-backed |
|
|
1,406 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
10,540 |
|
|
|
380 |
|
|
|
11,946 |
|
|
|
399 |
|
Corporate bonds and municipals |
|
|
9,203 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
174,331 |
|
|
|
6,440 |
|
|
|
183,534 |
|
|
|
6,474 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,167 |
|
|
|
933 |
|
|
|
5,167 |
|
|
|
933 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
38,111 |
|
|
$ |
271 |
|
|
$ |
201,738 |
|
|
$ |
8,002 |
|
|
$ |
239,849 |
|
|
$ |
8,273 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized Losses Less Than 12 Months
Of the $29,000 in unrealized losses that had existed for less than twelve months at September
30, 2010, no security had an unrealized loss in excess of 10% of the securitys cost.
Of the $271,000 in unrealized losses that had existed for less than twelve months at December
31, 2009, no security had an unrealized loss in excess of 10% of the securitys cost.
Unrealized Losses 12 Months or Longer
Of the $1.2 million in unrealized losses that had existed for twelve months or longer at
September 30, 2010, one security classified as Corporate bonds and municipals in the table above
had an unrealized loss in excess of 10% of the securitys cost. The amount of unrealized loss with
respect to that security was $540,000 at September 30, 2010.
Of the $8.0 million in unrealized losses that had existed for twelve months or longer at
December 31, 2009, eight securities had unrealized losses in excess of 10% of the securitys cost,
of which two were classified as Asset-backed securities, one was classified as Other, four were
classified as Corporate bonds and municipals, and one was classified as Collateralized debt
obligations in the table above. The amount of unrealized loss with respect to those securities
was $3.9 million at December 31, 2009, of which $307,000 relates to Asset-backed securities,
$933,000 relates to Other, $2.5 million relates to Corporate bonds and municipals and $155,000
relates to
Collateralized debt obligations in the table above.
16
As a Company that holds investments in the financial services industry, HealthMarkets has been
affected by conditions in U.S. financial markets and economic conditions throughout the world. The
financial environment in the U.S. was volatile during 2008; however, the Company has seen improved
market conditions during 2009 and 2010, which are reflected in the decrease in unrealized losses,
as well as a decrease in the number of securities with unrealized losses. The Company continually
monitors investments with unrealized losses that have existed for twelve months or longer and
considers such factors as the current financial condition of the issuer, the performance of
underlying collateral and effective yields. Additionally, the Company considers whether it has the
intent to sell the security and whether it is more likely than not that the Company will be
required to sell the debt security before the fair value reverts to its cost basis, which may be at
maturity of the security. Based on such review, the Company believes that, as of September 30,
2010, the unrealized loss in these investments is temporary.
It is at least reasonably probable that the Companys assessment of whether the unrealized
losses are other than temporary may change over time, given, among other things, the dynamic nature
of markets and changes in the Companys assessment of its ability or intent to hold impaired
investment securities, which could result in the Company recognizing other-than-temporary
impairment charges or realized losses on the sale of such investments in the future.
Equity securities
The Company had no unrealized investment gains and no unrealized losses on equity securities
during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010. The Company had gross unrealized
investment gains on equity securities of $4,000 and $1,000 during the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009, respectively.
4. STUDENT LOANS
Through its student loan funding vehicles, CFLD-I and UFC2, the Company holds alternative
(i.e., non-federally guaranteed) student loans extended to students at selected colleges and
universities. The Companys insurance subsidiaries previously offered an interest-sensitive whole
life insurance product with a child term rider. The child term rider included a special provision
under which private student loans to help fund the insured childs higher education could be made
available, subject to the terms, conditions and qualifications of the policy and the child term
rider. Pursuant to the terms of the child term rider, the making of any student loan is expressly
conditioned on the availability of a guarantee for the loan at the time the loan is made. During
2003, the Company discontinued offering the child term rider; however, for policies previously
issued, outstanding potential commitments to fund student loans extend through 2026.
In connection with the Companys exit from the Life Insurance Division business,
HealthMarkets, LLC entered into Coinsurance Agreements with Wilton Reassurance Company or its
affiliates (Wilton). In accordance with the terms of the Coinsurance Agreements, Wilton will fund
student loans; provided, however, that Wilton will not be required to fund any student loan that
would cause the aggregate par value of all such loans funded by Wilton, following the Coinsurance
Effective Date, to exceed $10.0 million. As of September 30, 2010, approximately $1.9 million of
student loans have been funded by Wilton.
Pursuant to a Private Loan Program Loan Origination and Sale Agreement (the Loan Origination
Agreement), dated July 28, 2005, among Richland State Bank, Richland Loan Processing Center, LLC
(collectively, Richland), UICI and UFC2, the student loans were originated by Richland. Once
issued, UFC2 would purchase the loans from Richland and provide for the administration of the
loans. On April 28, 2010, Richland gave written notice of its intent to terminate the Loan
Origination Agreement and the agreement terminated effective July 28, 2010. The Company is
attempting to find a replacement for Richland; however, there can be no assurance whether and when
a new lender will be located. In addition, as discussed above, the making of any student loan is
expressly conditioned on the availability of a guarantee for the loan, and there is no longer a
guarantor for the student loan program. As a result, loans under the child term rider are not
available at this time.
5. GRAPEVINE
On August 3, 2006, Grapevine Finance, LLC (Grapevine) was incorporated in the State of
Delaware as a wholly owned subsidiary of HealthMarkets, LLC. On August 16, 2006, MEGA distributed
and assigned to HealthMarkets, LLC, as a dividend in kind, a $150.8 million note receivable from a
unit of the CIGNA Corporation as consideration for the receipt of the former Star HRG assets (the
CIGNA Note) and a related guaranty agreement pursuant to which the CIGNA Corporation
unconditionally guaranteed the payment when due of the CIGNA Note (the Guaranty Agreement). After
receiving the assigned CIGNA Note and Guaranty Agreement from MEGA, HealthMarkets, LLC, assigned
the CIGNA Note and Guaranty Agreement to Grapevine. On August 16, 2006, Grapevine issued $72.4
million of its senior secured notes (the Grapevine Notes) to an institutional purchaser (see Note
7 of Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements). The net proceeds from the Grapevine
Notes of $71.9 million were distributed to HealthMarkets, LLC. On November 1, 2006, the Companys
investment in Grapevine was reduced by the receipt of cash from Grapevine of $72.4 million.
17
Prior to January 1, 2010, the Company accounted for its investment in Grapevine under SFAS No.
140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities
(SFAS No. 140), which was codified into ASC 860. Under SFAS No. 140, the Companys investment in
Grapevine was classified as a non-consolidated qualifying special-purpose entity (QSPE). As a
QSPE, the Company did not consolidate the financial results of Grapevine and, instead, accounted
for its residual interest in Grapevine as an investment in fixed maturity securities pursuant to
EITF No. 99-20, Recognition of Interest Income and Impairment on Purchased Beneficial Interests and
Beneficial Interests That Continue to Be Held by a Transferor in Securitized Financial Assets,
which was codified into FASB ASC Topic 325 40, Investments Other Beneficial Interests in
Securitized Financial Assets (ASC 325-40). The Company recorded its investment in Grapevine, at
fair value, in Fixed maturities on the consolidated balance sheets.
On January 1, 2010, the Company adopted ASU 2009-16 (see Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated
Condensed Financial Statements Recent Accounting Pronouncements). The Company performed an
analysis to determine if Grapevine is a variable interest entity (VIE) and if so, whether or not
the activities of Grapevine should be included in consolidation. During such analysis, the Company
determined that HealthMarkets, LLC has the power to direct matters that most significantly impact
the activities of the Grapevine, LLC and HealthMarkets, LLC has the obligation to absorb losses or
the right to receive benefits of the VIE that could potentially be significant to Grapevine, LLC.
After such analysis, the Company concluded that Grapevine is a VIE, and its activities should be
included in consolidation. As such, the note receivable from CIGNA is recorded at fair value in
Fixed maturities on the consolidated condensed balance sheet (see Note 3 of Notes to Consolidated
Condensed Financial Statements) and the Grapevine notes are recorded in Debt on the consolidated
condensed balance sheet (see Note 7 of Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements).
6. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLES
Goodwill and other intangible assets by segment as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Commercial Health Division |
|
$ |
40,025 |
|
|
$ |
16,620 |
|
|
$ |
(10,950 |
) |
|
$ |
45,695 |
|
Insphere |
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,663 |
|
|
|
(1,062 |
) |
|
|
37,601 |
|
Disposed Operations |
|
|
359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
40,384 |
|
|
$ |
55,283 |
|
|
$ |
(12,012 |
) |
|
$ |
83,655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Commercial Health Division |
|
$ |
40,025 |
|
|
$ |
55,283 |
|
|
$ |
(9,694 |
) |
|
$ |
85,614 |
|
Disposed Operations |
|
|
359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
40,384 |
|
|
$ |
55,283 |
|
|
$ |
(9,694 |
) |
|
$ |
85,973 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other intangible assets include the acquisition of the right to certain renewal
commissions from Special Investment Risks, Ltd (SIR). Previously, SIR sold health insurance
policies that were either issued by a third-party insurance company and coinsured by the Company,
or policies that were issued directly by the Company. Effective January 1, 1997, the Company
acquired the agency force of SIR, and in accordance with the terms of the asset sale agreement, SIR
retained the right to receive certain commissions and renewal commissions. On May 19, 2006, the
Company and SIR entered into a termination agreement, pursuant to which SIR received an aggregate
of $47.5 million from the Company and all future commission payments owed to SIR under the asset
sale agreement were discharged in full.
Intangible Asset Amortization 2010 Change in Estimate
On January 1, 2010, the Company transferred a portion of the intangible asset related to SIR
from the Commercial Health Division to Insphere as a result of the reorganization of the Companys
agent sales force and the launch of Insphere, with which these agents are now associated. At the
time of such transfer, the Company re-evaluated the amortization periods recorded in both the
Commercial Health Division and Insphere. Based on such evaluation, the Company determined that the
portion related to Insphere should continue to be amortized through 2029. The Company also
determined that due to the decrease in the number of health policies issued through the Commercial
Health Division, the portion of the intangible asset that remains with the Commercial Health
Division will be amortized over a remaining period of 60 months. These changes resulted in an
increase in Underwriting, acquisition and insurance expenses on the consolidated condensed
statement of income of $315,000 and $1.2 million for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2010, respectively.
18
The Company recorded amortization expense associated with other intangible assets of $696,000
and $2.3 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively.
Estimated amortization expense for the next five years and thereafter related to intangible
assets is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
|
Expense |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
$ |
640 |
|
2011 |
|
|
2,075 |
|
2012 |
|
|
1,690 |
|
2013 |
|
|
1,629 |
|
2014 |
|
|
1,794 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
31,399 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
39,227 |
|
|
|
|
|
7. DEBT
On April 5, 2006, HealthMarkets, LLC entered into a credit agreement, providing for a $500.0
million term loan facility and a $75.0 million revolving credit facility, which includes a $35.0
million letter of credit sub-facility. The full amount of the term loan was drawn at closing. At
September 30, 2010, the Company had an aggregate of $362.5 million of indebtedness outstanding
under the term loan facility, which indebtedness bore interest at the London inter-bank offered
rate (LIBOR) plus a borrowing margin of 1.00%. The Company has not drawn on the $75.0 million
revolving credit facility.
In addition, on April 5, 2006, HealthMarkets Capital Trust I and HealthMarkets Capital Trust
II (two Delaware statutory business trusts, collectively the Trusts) issued $100.0 million of
floating rate trust preferred securities (the Trust Securities) and $3.1 million of floating rate
common securities. The Trusts invested the proceeds from the sale of the Trust Securities,
together with the proceeds from the issuance to HealthMarkets, LLC by the Trusts of the common
securities, in $100.0 million principal amount of HealthMarkets, LLCs Floating Rate Junior
Subordinated Notes due June 15, 2036 (the Notes), of which $50.0 million principal amount accrue
interest at a floating rate equal to three-month LIBOR plus 3.05% and $50.0 million principal
amount accrue interest at a fixed rate of 8.367%.
On April 29, 2004, UICI Capital Trust I (a Delaware statutory business trust, the 2004
Trust) completed the private placement of $15.0 million aggregate issuance amount of floating rate
trust preferred securities with an aggregate liquidation value of $15.0 million (the 2004 Trust
Preferred Securities). The 2004 Trust invested the $15.0 million proceeds from the sale of the
2004 Trust Preferred Securities, together with the proceeds from the issuance to the Company by the
2004 Trust of its floating rate common securities in the amount of $470,000 (the Common
Securities and, collectively with the 2004 Trust Preferred Securities, the 2004 Trust
Securities), in an equivalent face amount of the Companys Floating Rate Junior Subordinated Notes
due 2034 (the 2004 Notes). The 2004 Notes will mature on April 29, 2034. The 2004 Notes accrue
interest at a floating rate equal to three-month LIBOR plus 3.50%, payable quarterly.
On August 16, 2006, Grapevine issued $72.4 million of its senior secured notes (the Grapevine
Notes) to an institutional purchaser. The net proceeds from the Grapevine Notes of $71.9 million
were distributed to HealthMarkets, LLC. The Grapevine Notes bear interest at an annual rate of
6.712%. The interest is to be paid semi-annually on January 15th and July
15th of each year beginning on January 15, 2007. The principal payment is due at
maturity on July 15, 2021. The Grapevine Notes are collateralized by Grapevines assets including
the CIGNA Note. Grapevine services its debt primarily from cash receipts from the CIGNA Note. All
cash receipts from the CIGNA Note are paid into a debt service coverage account maintained and held
by an institutional trustee (the Grapevine Trustee) for the benefit of the holder of the
Grapevine Notes. Pursuant to an indenture and direction notices from Grapevine, the Grapevine
Trustee uses the proceeds in the debt service coverage account to (i) make interest payments on the
Grapevine Notes, (ii) pay for certain Grapevine expenses and (iii) distribute cash to
HealthMarkets, subject to satisfaction of certain restricted payment tests.
19
The following table sets forth detail of the Companys debt and interest expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense |
|
|
|
Principal Amount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
at |
|
|
Maturity |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
Date |
|
|
Rate(a) |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
2006 credit agreement: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term loan |
|
$ |
362,500 |
|
|
|
2012 |
|
|
|
1.528 |
% |
|
$ |
2,540 |
|
|
$ |
3,737 |
|
|
$ |
8,571 |
|
|
$ |
12,757 |
|
$75 Million revolver (non-use fee) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
235 |
|
Grapevine Note |
|
|
72,350 |
|
|
|
2021 |
|
|
|
6.712 |
% |
|
|
1,220 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,632 |
|
|
|
|
|
Trust preferred securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UICI Capital Trust I |
|
|
15,470 |
|
|
|
2034 |
|
|
|
3.876 |
% |
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
450 |
|
|
|
544 |
|
HealthMarkets Capital Trust I |
|
|
51,550 |
|
|
|
2036 |
|
|
|
3.342 |
% |
|
|
467 |
|
|
|
478 |
|
|
|
1,330 |
|
|
|
1,668 |
|
HealthMarkets Capital Trust II |
|
|
51,550 |
|
|
|
2036 |
|
|
|
8.367 |
% |
|
|
1,102 |
|
|
|
1,102 |
|
|
|
3,271 |
|
|
|
3,271 |
|
Other: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on Deferred Tax Gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.000 |
% |
|
|
536 |
|
|
|
790 |
|
|
|
1,591 |
|
|
|
2,357 |
|
Amortization of financing fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,286 |
|
|
|
1,195 |
|
|
|
3,780 |
|
|
|
3,554 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
553,420 |
|
|
|
|
(b) |
|
|
0.000 |
%(c) |
|
$ |
7,375 |
|
|
$ |
7,559 |
|
|
$ |
22,835 |
|
|
$ |
24,386 |
|
Student Loan Credit Facility |
|
|
70,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
866 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
623,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,375 |
|
|
$ |
7,559 |
|
|
$ |
22,835 |
|
|
$ |
25,252 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Represents the interest rate September 30, 2010. |
|
(b) |
|
The Series 2001A-1 Notes and Series 2001A-2 Notes have a final stated maturity of July
1, 2036; the Series 2002A Notes have a final stated maturity of July 1, 2037 (see Student
Loan Credit Facility discussion below). |
|
(c) |
|
The interest rate on each series of SPE Notes resets monthly in a Dutch auction process. |
The fair value of the Companys debt, exclusive of indebtedness outstanding under the
secured student loan credit facility, was $491.7 million and $394.8 million at September 30, 2010
and December 31, 2009, respectively. The fair value of such debt is estimated using discounted cash
flow analyses, based on the Companys current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of
borrowing arrangements. At September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the carrying amount of
outstanding indebtedness secured by student loans approximated the fair value, as interest rates on
such indebtedness reset monthly.
Student Loan Credit Facility
At September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Company had an aggregate of $70.4 million and
$77.4 million, respectively, of indebtedness outstanding under a secured student loan credit
facility (the Student Loan Credit Facility), which indebtedness is represented by Student Loan
Asset-Backed Notes issued by a bankruptcy-remote special purpose entity (the SPE Notes). At
September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, indebtedness outstanding under the Student Loan Credit
Facility was secured by student loans and accrued interest in the carrying amount of $63.1 million
and $70.8 million, respectively, and by a pledge of cash, cash equivalents and other qualified
investments of $7.4 million and $6.6 million, respectively.
The SPE Notes represent obligations solely of the SPE, and not of the Company or any other
subsidiary of the Company. For financial reporting and accounting purposes, the Student Loan Credit
Facility has been classified as a financing as opposed to a sale. Accordingly, in connection with
the financing, the Company recorded no gain on sale of the assets transferred to the SPE.
The SPE Notes were issued by the SPE in three tranches: $50.0 million of Series 2001A-1 Notes
(the Series 2001A -1 Notes) and $50.0 million of Series 2001A-2 Notes (the Series 2001A-2
Notes), both issued on April 27, 2001, and $50.0 million of Series 2002A Notes (the Series 2002A
Notes) issued on April 10, 2002. The interest rate on each series of SPE Notes resets monthly in a
Dutch auction process. The Series 2001A-1 Notes and Series 2001A-2 Notes have a final stated
maturity of July 1, 2036; the Series 2002A Notes have a final stated maturity of July 1, 2037.
Beginning July 1, 2005, the SPE Notes were also subject to mandatory redemption in whole or in part
on each interest payment date from any monies received as a recovery of the principal amount of any
student loan securing payment of the SPE Notes, including scheduled, delinquent and advance
payments, payouts or prepayments. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, the
Company made principal payments of approximately $2.1 million and $7.0 million, respectively, on
the SPE notes. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Company made
principal payments of approximately $2.2 million and $7.2 million, respectively, on the SPE notes.
20
8. DERIVATIVES
HealthMarkets uses derivative instruments, specifically interest rate swaps, as part of its
risk management activities to protect against the risk of changes in prevailing interest rates
adversely affecting future cash flows associated with
certain debt. The Company accounts for such interest rate swaps in accordance with ASC Topic
815 Derivatives and Hedging. These swap agreements are designed as hedging instruments and the
Company formally documents qualifying hedged transactions and hedging instruments, and assesses,
both at inception of the contract and on an ongoing basis, whether the hedging instruments are
effective in offsetting changes in cash flows of the hedged transaction. The Company uses
regression analysis to assess the hedge effectiveness in achieving the offsetting cash flows
attributable to the risk being hedged. In addition, the Company utilizes the hypothetical
derivative methodology for the measurement of ineffectiveness. Derivative gains and losses not
effective in hedging the expected cash flows will be recognized immediately in earnings. In
accordance with ASC 820, the fair values of the Companys interest rate swaps are also contained in
Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements. In assessing the fair value, the
Company takes into consideration the current interest rates and the current creditworthiness of the
counterparties, as well as the current creditworthiness of the Company, as applicable.
At September 30, 2010, the Company owned one interest rate swap agreement with an aggregate
notional amount of $100 million. The terms of the swap agreement is 5 years beginning on April 11,
2006. The Company had a 4 year swap with an aggregate notional amount of $100 million that matured
on April 11, 2010.
The Company employs control procedures to validate the reasonableness of valuation estimates
obtained from a third party. The table below represents the fair values of the Companys
derivative assets and liabilities as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Derivatives |
|
|
Liability Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
Balance Sheet |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Balance Sheet |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
Location |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Location |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Derivatives
designated as
hedging instruments
under ASC Topic
815: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
$ |
3,493 |
|
|
$ |
8,766 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,493 |
|
|
$ |
8,766 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The table below represents the effect of derivative instruments in hedging relationships
under ASC Topic 815 on the Companys consolidated condensed statements of income for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative Instruments in Hedging Relationships for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of Gain |
|
|
Amount of Interest |
|
|
Location of (Gain) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) from |
|
|
Expense (Income) |
|
|
Loss Recognized in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain (Loss) |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Reclassified from |
|
|
Income on |
|
|
Amount of (Gain) Loss |
|
|
|
Recognized in OCI on |
|
|
OCI into Income |
|
|
Accumulated OCI |
|
|
Derivative |
|
|
Recognized in Income on |
|
|
|
Derivative |
|
|
(Effective |
|
|
into Income |
|
|
(Ineffective |
|
|
Derivative |
|
|
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
|
Portion) |
|
|
(Expense) (Effective Portion) |
|
|
Portion) |
|
|
(Ineffective Portion) |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,243 |
|
|
Interest Expense |
|
$ |
1,153 |
|
|
$ |
2,255 |
|
|
Investment income |
|
$ |
64 |
|
|
$ |
125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative Instruments in Hedging Relationships for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of Gain |
|
|
Amount of Interest |
|
|
Location of (Gain) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) from |
|
|
Expense (Income) |
|
|
Loss Recognized in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain (Loss) |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Reclassified from |
|
|
Income on |
|
|
Amount of (Gain) Loss |
|
|
|
Recognized in OCI on |
|
|
OCI into Income |
|
|
Accumulated OCI |
|
|
Derivative |
|
|
Recognized in Income on |
|
|
|
Derivative |
|
|
(Effective |
|
|
into Income |
|
|
(Ineffective |
|
|
Derivative |
|
|
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
|
Portion) |
|
|
(Expense) (Effective Portion) |
|
|
Portion) |
|
|
(Ineffective Portion) |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
$ |
4,507 |
|
|
$ |
5,224 |
|
|
Interest Expense |
|
$ |
4,868 |
|
|
$ |
6,741 |
|
|
Investment income |
|
$ |
322 |
|
|
$ |
519 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2010 and 2009, the Company did not have any derivative instruments not designated
as hedging instruments.
HealthMarkets does not expect the ineffectiveness related to its hedging activity to be
material to the Companys financial results in the future. There were no components of the
derivative instruments that were excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness.
21
At September 30, 2010, accumulated other comprehensive income included a deferred after-tax
net loss of $1.7 million related to the interest rate swaps of which $197,000 ($129,000 net of tax)
is the remaining amount of loss associated with the previous terminated hedging relationship. This
amount is expected to be reclassified into Investment income on the Companys consolidated
statement of income (loss) in conjunction with the interest payments on the variable rate debt
through April 2011.
9. NET INCOME PER SHARE
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
22,243 |
|
|
$ |
17,395 |
|
|
$ |
33,415 |
|
|
$ |
28,611 |
|
Income from discontinued operations |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common shareholders |
|
$ |
22,255 |
|
|
$ |
17,450 |
|
|
$ |
33,454 |
|
|
$ |
28,717 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding, basic |
|
|
29,815 |
|
|
|
29,424 |
|
|
|
29,702 |
|
|
|
29,582 |
|
Dilutive effect of stock options and other shares |
|
|
808 |
|
|
|
648 |
|
|
|
889 |
|
|
|
601 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding, dilutive |
|
|
30,623 |
|
|
|
30,072 |
|
|
|
30,591 |
|
|
|
30,183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.75 |
|
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
|
$ |
1.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.97 |
|
From discontinued operations |
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share, basic |
|
$ |
0.75 |
|
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
|
$ |
1.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.73 |
|
|
$ |
0.58 |
|
|
$ |
1.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.95 |
|
From discontinued operations |
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share, basic |
|
$ |
0.73 |
|
|
$ |
0.58 |
|
|
$ |
1.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Litigation and Regulatory Matters
The Company is a party to various material proceedings, which are described in the Companys
Annual Report on Form 10-K filed for the year ended December 31, 2009 under the caption Item 3.
Legal Proceedings. Except as discussed below, during the three month period covered by this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the Company has not been named in any new material legal proceeding,
and there have been no material developments in the previously reported legal proceedings.
Litigation Matters
As previously disclosed, Mid-West was named as a defendant in an action filed on January 9,
2009 (Matthew Austen v. Mid-West National Life Insurance Company of Tennessee; Elizabeth Solomon)
in the Superior Court of Orange County, California, Case No. 30-2009 00117080. Plaintiff alleged
bad faith, breach of contract, negligent misrepresentation, and intentional misrepresentation and
sought unspecified economic, punitive, exemplary, and mental damages, costs, interest, and
attorneys fees. On June 1, 2009, the case was transferred on Mid-Wests motion for change of
venue to Los Angeles County Superior Court (Matthew Austen v. Mid-West National Life Insurance
Company of Tennessee; Elizabeth Solomon), Case No. LC086172. The parties settled this matter in
connection with a mediation held on October 12, 2010 and this action has been dismissed.
As previously disclosed, on December 18, 2008, HealthMarkets and MEGA were named as defendants
in a putative class action (Jerry T. Hopkins, individually and on behalf all those others similarly
situated v. HealthMarkets, Inc. et al.) pending in the Superior Court of Los Angeles County,
California, Case No. BC404133. Plaintiff alleges invasion of privacy in violation of California
Penal Code § 630, et seq., negligence and the violation of common law privacy arising from
allegations that the defendants monitored and/or recorded the telephone conversations of California
residents without providing them with notice or obtaining their consent. Plaintiff seeks an order
certifying the suit as a California class action and seeks compensatory and punitive damages. On
December 3, 2009, plaintiff Jerry Hopkins was dismissed as the class plaintiff and Jerry Buszek was
substituted in his place. On March 10, 2010, defendants motion for summary judgment was denied.
On August 16, 2010, plaintiff filed a motion for class certification. Discovery is ongoing and no
trial date has been set.
22
As previously disclosed, MEGA was named as defendant in an action filed on April 13, 2009
(Richard Doble and Rochelle Doble v. MEGA) pending in the United States District Court, Northern
District of California, Case No. CV 09-1611-CRB. Plaintiffs have alleged several causes of action,
including breach of contract and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing.
Plaintiffs seek unspecified general and compensatory damages, punitive damages, damages for
emotional distress and attorneys fees. Discovery in this matter is ongoing and a jury trial is
scheduled to begin in November of 2010.
MEGA was named as a defendant in an action filed on August 5, 2008 (Robert Perry v. The MEGA
Life and Health Insurance Company, et al.) pending in the Superior Court of Maricopa County,
Arizona, Case No. CV2008-018505. Plaintiff alleged several causes of action arising from a dispute
regarding medical claims, including breach of contract, bad faith, false advertising, consumer
fraud, professional negligence and negligent misrepresentation and sought unspecified actual,
general, and punitive damages and attorneys fees and costs. In connection with a mediation held
on November 3, 2010, the parties reached an agreement in principle to settle this matter.
The Company believes that resolution of the above proceedings, after consideration of
applicable reserves and/or potentially available insurance coverage benefits, did not (to the
extent resolved) or will not (to the extent not already resolved) have a material adverse effect on
the Companys consolidated financial condition and results of operations.
The Company and its subsidiaries are parties to various other pending and threatened legal
proceedings, claims, demands, disputes and other matters arising in the ordinary course of
business, including some asserting significant liabilities arising from claims, demands, disputes
and other matters with respect to insurance policies, relationships with agents, relationships with
former or current employees and other matters. From time to time, some such matters, where
appropriate, may be the subject of internal investigation by management, the Board of Directors, or
a committee of the Board of Directors.
Given the expense and inherent risks and uncertainties of litigation, we regularly evaluate
litigation matters pending against us, including those described in Note 18 of Notes to the
Companys Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009, to determine if settlement of such matters would be in the
best interests of the Company and its stockholders. The costs associated with any such settlement
could be substantial and, in certain cases, could result in an earnings charge in any particular
quarter in which we enter into a settlement agreement. Although we have recorded litigation
reserves which represent our best estimate on probable losses, both known and incurred but not
reported, our recorded reserves might prove to be inadequate to cover an adverse result or
settlement for extraordinary matters. Therefore, costs associated with the various litigation
matters to which we are subject and any earnings charge recorded in connection with a settlement
agreement could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations in a
period, depending on the results of our operations for the particular period.
Regulatory Matters
Since October 2004, the Company has been engaged in discussions with the Office of the
Insurance Commissioner of Washington State (the Washington DOI) in an effort to resolve issues
with respect to the use of a policy form that was initially approved by the Office in 1997. As
previously disclosed, on March 8, 2005, the Washington DOI issued a cease and desist order
prohibiting MEGA from selling a previously approved health insurance product to consumers in the
State of Washington. The Company voluntarily terminated the sale of similar products by Mid-West
pending resolution of this matter with the Washington DOI. The Companys association group business
in Washington that is individually underwritten is considered to be large group business for
purposes of the state minimum loss ratio standard. The minimum loss ratio standard is currently
80%. As a result of these matters, the Company has determined that it might not be in a position to
operate on a profitable basis in Washington State. In March 2010, the Company and the Washington
DOI reached a preliminary agreement in principle that the Company would non-renew its health
benefit plan policies and withdraw from the health benefit plan market place in the next several
months, subject to further discussions between the parties regarding the implications of national
health care reform. MEGA and Mid-West currently have over 9,000 certificate holders in the State of
Washington. Following such further discussions between the parties, in May 2010, the Company
proposed to maintain the status quo for the Companys in force block of business pending
finalization of applicable regulations necessary to assess the impact of national health care
reform. Discussion with the Washington DOI regarding the Companys proposal is ongoing.
23
The Companys insurance subsidiaries are subject to various other pending market conduct or
other regulatory examinations, inquiries or proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business.
As previously disclosed, these matters
include the multi-state market conduct examination of the Companys principal insurance
subsidiaries for the examination period January 1, 2000 through December 31, 2005, which was
resolved on May 29, 2008 through execution of a regulatory settlement agreement with the states of
Washington and Alaska and four other monitoring states. The settlement agreement provides, among
other things, for a re-examination by the monitoring states. If the re-examination is unfavorable,
the Companys principal insurance subsidiaries are subject to additional penalties of up to $10
million. Reference is made to the discussion of these and other matters contained in the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 under the caption Item 3
Legal Proceedings and in Note 18 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in such
report. State insurance regulatory agencies have authority to levy significant fines and penalties
and require remedial action resulting from findings made during the course of such matters. Market
conduct or other regulatory examinations, inquiries or proceedings could result in, among other
things, changes in business practices that require the Company to incur substantial costs. Such
results, individually or in combination, could injure our reputation, cause negative publicity,
adversely affect our debt and financial strength ratings, place us at a competitive disadvantage in
marketing or administering our products or impair our ability to sell insurance policies or retain
customers, thereby adversely affecting our business, and potentially materially adversely affecting
the results of operations in a period, depending on the results of operations for the particular
period. Determination by regulatory authorities that we have engaged in improper conduct could also
adversely affect our defense of various lawsuits.
In March 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and a reconciliation measure,
the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (collectively, the Health Care Reform
Legislation) were signed into law. The Health Care Reform Legislation will result in broad-based
material changes to the United States health care system. The Health Care Reform Legislation is
expected to significantly impact the Companys financial conditions and results of operations,
including but not limited to the minimum medical loss ratio requirements applicable to its
insurance subsidiaries as well to third-party insurance carriers doing business with Insphere.
Provisions of the Health Care Reform Legislation become effective at various dates over the next
several years and a number of additional steps are required to implement these requirements,
including, without limitation, further guidance and clarification in the form of implementing
regulations. Due to the complexity of the Health Care Reform Legislation, the pending status of
implementing regulations and lack of interpretive guidance, and gradual implementation, the full
impact of Health Care Reform Legislation on the Companys business is not yet fully known. However,
the Company has started to dedicate material resources and, in the future, expects to dedicate
additional material resources and to incur material expenses to implement Health Care Reform
Legislation and expects that certain elements of the Health Care Reform Legislation will have a
material adverse effect on its financial condition and results of operations. For additional
information, see Item 2 Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations, National Health Care Reform discussion on beginning on page 29.
11. STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
The Companys Board of Directors determines the prevailing fair market value of the
HealthMarkets Class A-1 and A-2 common stock in good faith, considering factors it deems
appropriate. Since the de-listing of the Companys stock in 2006, the Company has generally
retained several independent investment firms to value its common stock on an annual basis, or more
frequently if circumstances warrant. When setting the fair market value of the Companys common
stock, the Board considers among other factors it deems appropriate, each independent investment
firms valuation for reasonableness in light of known and expected circumstances.
As of September 30, 2010, the fair market value of the Companys Class A-1 and Class A-2
common stock, as determined by the Board of Directors, was $9.03.
12. SEGMENT INFORMATION
The Company operates four business segments: the Insurance segment, Insphere, Corporate, and
Disposed Operations. The Insurance segment includes the Companys Commercial Health Division.
Insphere includes net commission revenue, agent incentives, marketing costs and costs associated
with the creation and development of Insphere. Corporate includes investment income not allocated
to the Insurance segment, realized gains or losses, interest expense on corporate debt, the
Companys student loan business, general expenses relating to corporate operations and operations
that do not constitute reportable operating segments. Disposed Operations includes the remaining
run out of the Medicare Division and the Other Insurance Division as well as the residual
operations from the disposition of other businesses prior to 2009.
24
Allocations of investment income and certain general expenses are based on a number of
assumptions and estimates, and the business segments reported operating results would change if
different allocation methods were applied. Certain assets are not individually identifiable by
segment and, accordingly, have been allocated by formulas. Segment revenues
include premiums and other policy charges and considerations, net investment income,
commission revenue, fees and other income. Management does not allocate income taxes to segments.
Transactions between reportable segments are accounted for under respective agreements, which
provide for such transactions generally at cost.
Revenue from continuing operations, income from continuing operations before income taxes, and
assets by operating segment are set forth in the tables below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Revenue from continuing operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance Commercial Health Division: |
|
$ |
192,151 |
|
|
$ |
259,625 |
|
|
$ |
620,755 |
|
|
$ |
816,213 |
|
Insphere: |
|
|
11,511 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,524 |
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate: |
|
|
4,762 |
|
|
|
5,001 |
|
|
|
17,173 |
|
|
|
8,997 |
|
Intersegment Eliminations: |
|
|
(3,027 |
) |
|
|
(516 |
) |
|
|
(7,116 |
) |
|
|
(516 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues excluding disposed operations |
|
|
205,397 |
|
|
|
264,110 |
|
|
|
655,336 |
|
|
|
824,694 |
|
Disposed Operations: |
|
|
746 |
|
|
|
2,669 |
|
|
|
1,934 |
|
|
|
8,675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue from continuing operations |
|
$ |
206,143 |
|
|
$ |
266,779 |
|
|
$ |
657,270 |
|
|
$ |
833,369 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before federal income taxes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance Commercial Health Division: |
|
$ |
89,474 |
|
|
$ |
44,494 |
|
|
$ |
187,883 |
|
|
$ |
108,944 |
|
Insphere: |
|
|
(23,341 |
) |
|
|
(3,842 |
) |
|
|
(69,862 |
) |
|
|
(3,842 |
) |
Corporate: |
|
|
(33,088 |
) |
|
|
(16,744 |
) |
|
|
(65,326 |
) |
|
|
(53,163 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating income excluding disposed operations |
|
|
33,045 |
|
|
|
23,908 |
|
|
|
52,695 |
|
|
|
51,939 |
|
Disposed Operations |
|
|
1,149 |
|
|
|
3,131 |
|
|
|
2,008 |
|
|
|
(6,872 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income from continuing operations before federal income taxes |
|
$ |
34,194 |
|
|
$ |
27,039 |
|
|
$ |
54,703 |
|
|
$ |
45,067 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets by operating segment at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 are set forth in
the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance Commercial Health Division: |
|
$ |
527,577 |
|
|
$ |
731,594 |
|
Insphere: |
|
|
71,014 |
|
|
|
14,507 |
|
Corporate: |
|
|
770,991 |
|
|
|
734,040 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets excluding assets of Disposed Operations |
|
|
1,369,582 |
|
|
|
1,480,141 |
|
Disposed Operations |
|
|
378,201 |
|
|
|
391,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,747,783 |
|
|
$ |
1,871,498 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disposed Operations assets at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 primarily
represent reinsurance recoverable for the former Life Insurance Division of $355.4 million and
$353.7 million, respectively, associated with the Coinsurance Agreements entered into with Wilton.
13. AGENT AND EMPLOYEE STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION PLANS
Stock Plan Awards
In September 2010, the Company granted 485,000 non-qualified stock option awards and 200,000
restricted stock awards under the Second Amended and Restated HealthMarkets 2006 Management Options
Plan. Each of the awards vests in 20% increments over five years. The stock options have an
exercise price equal to the fair market value per share at the date of grant. In connection with
the granting of the stock option awards, certain individuals were required to forfeit all stock
options previously granted to such individuals. In total, 20,400 previously granted stock options
were forfeited, of which 3,055 stock options consisted of performance options with no established
performance goals.
InVest Stock Ownership Plan
In connection with the reorganization of the Companys agent sales force into an independent
career-agent distribution company, and the launch of Insphere, effective January 1, 2010, the
series of stock accumulation plans established for the benefit of the independent contractor
insurance agents and contractor sales representatives (the Predecessor Plans) were superseded and
replaced by the HealthMarkets, Inc. InVest Stock Ownership Plan (ISOP). Eligible insurance agents
and designated eligible employees may participate in the ISOP. Accounts under the Predecessor
Plans were transferred to the ISOP. Several features of the ISOP differ in certain material
respects from the Predecessor Plans, including, but not limited to, plan participation by
designated eligible employees and the elimination of the reallocation of forfeited matching account
credits after June 30, 2010.
25
For financial reporting purposes, the Company accounts for the Company-match feature of the
ISOP for nonemployee agents by recognizing compensation expense over the vesting period in an
amount equal to the fair market value of vested shares at the date of their vesting and
distribution to the agent-participant. The Company accounts for the Company-match feature of the
ISOP for employees by recognizing compensation expense over the vesting period in an amount equal
to the fair market value of each award at the date of grant, or, in the case of outstanding awards
transferred from the Predecessor Plans, the fair market value at the date of employment. Expense on
awards granted after January 1, 2010, is recognized on a straight-line basis based on the Companys
policy adopted in 2006 for new plans effective after January 1, 2006. Expense on awards transferred
from Predecessor Plans will continue to be recognized on a graded basis. Employee awards are
equity-classified and changes in values and expense are offset to the Companys Additional Paid in
Capital account on its balance sheet. Nonemployee awards are liability-classified and changes are
reflected in the Other Liabilities on the balance sheet.
The liability, or cumulative paid-in capital, for matching credits is based on (i) the number
of unvested credits, (ii) the prevailing fair market value of the Companys common stock as
determined by the Companys Board of Directors and (iii) an estimate of the percentage of the
vesting period that has elapsed.
The accounting treatment of matching credits for nonemployee agent-participants result in
unpredictable stock-based compensation charges, dependent upon fluctuations in the fair market
value of the Companys common stock, as determined by the Companys Board of Directors. In periods
of decline in the fair market value of HealthMarkets common stock, the Company will recognize less
stock-based compensation expense than in periods of appreciation. In addition, in circumstances
where increases in the fair market value of the Companys common stock are followed by declines,
negative stock-based compensation expense may result as the cumulative liability for unvested
stock-based compensation expense is adjusted.
The Company recognized $779,000 and $355,000 of expense for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2010, respectively, in connection with the ISOP. The liability for nonemployee
participation in the ISOP increased $83,000 and decreased $9.2 million for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2010, respectively. Approximately, $6.9 million of the annual liability
decrease is the result of vesting of awards and $1.2 million of the decrease is related to the
transfer to paid in capital in connection with agents becoming employees. Paid in capital for
employee awards under the ISOP increased $695,000 and $2.6 million for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2010, respectively.
14. TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PARTIES
As of September 30, 2010, affiliates of The Blackstone Group, Goldman Sachs Capital Partners
and DLJ Merchant Banking Partners (the Private Equity Investors) held 52.9%, 21.7%, and 10.8%,
respectively, of the Companys outstanding equity securities. Certain members of the Board of
Directors of the Company are affiliated with the Private Equity Investors.
Transactions with the Private Equity Investors
Transaction and Monitoring Fee Agreements
Each of the Private Equity Investors provides to the Company ongoing monitoring, advisory and
consulting services, for which the Company pays each of The Blackstone Group, Goldman Sachs Capital
Partners and DLJ Merchant Banking Partners an annual monitoring fee. The annual monitoring fees
are, in each case, subject to an upward adjustment in each year based on the ratio of the Companys
consolidated earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) in such year
to consolidated EBITDA in the prior year, provided that the aggregate monitoring fees paid to all
advisors pursuant to the Transaction and Monitoring Fee Agreements in any year shall not exceed the
greater of $15.0 million or 3% of consolidated EBITDA in such year. Of the aggregate annual
monitoring fees of $15.0 million for 2010, the Company paid $12.5 million in January 2010, with
$7.7 million paid to The Blackstone Group, $3.2 million paid to Goldman Sachs Capital Partners and
$1.6 million paid to DLJ Merchant Banking Partners. The remaining balance of $2.5 million was paid
on April 30, 2010, with $1.5 million paid to the Blackstone Group, $635,000 paid to Goldman Sachs
Capital Partners and $317,000 paid to DLJ Merchant Banking Partners. The Company has expensed $11.3
million through September 30, 2010.
26
Investment in Certain Funds Affiliated with the Private Equity Investors
On April 20, 2007, the Companys Board of Directors approved a $10.0 million investment by
Mid-West in Goldman Sachs Real Estate Partners, L.P., a commercial real estate fund managed by an
affiliate of Goldman Sachs Capital Partners. The Company has committed such investment to be funded
over a series of capital calls. During 2009, the amount of the Companys original commitment was
reduced by $2.0 million, to $8.0 million. During the second quarter of 2010, the amount of the
Companys commitments was reduced by an additional $1.6 million, to $6.4 million. During the nine
months ended September 30, 2010, the Company funded capital calls totaling $1.2 million. As of
September 30, 2010, the Company had made contributions totaling $4.8 million, and had a remaining
commitment to Goldman Sachs Real Estate Partners, L.P. of $1.6 million.
On April 20, 2007, the Companys Board of Directors approved a $10.0 million investment by
MEGA in Blackstone Strategic Alliance Fund L.P., a hedge fund of funds managed by an affiliate of
The Blackstone Group. The Company has committed such investment to be funded over a series of
capital calls. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company funded
capital calls totaling $683,000 and $1.6 million, respectively. As of September 30, 2010, the
Company had made contributions totaling $8.4 million; applied credits totaling $700,000; and had a
remaining commitment to The Blackstone Strategic Alliance Fund L.P. of $900,000.
Other
From time to time, the Company may obtain goods or services from parties in which the Private
Equity Investors hold an equity interest. For example, in 2010 and 2009, the Company held several
events at a hotel in which an affiliate of The Blackstone Group holds an equity interest. During
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, in connection with these events, the Company
paid the hotel approximately $421,000 and $2.5 million, respectively. During the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2009, in connection with these events, the Company paid the hotel
approximately $1.2 million and $3.8 million, respectively. Employees of the Company traveling on
business may also, from time to time, receive goods or services from entities in which the Private
Equity Investors hold an equity interest.
15. INSPHERE SECURITIES, INC.
On April 13, 2010, the Company completed the acquisition of Beneficial Investment Services,
Inc. (BIS), a broker-dealer and registered investment adviser, and changed BIS name to Insphere
Securities, Inc. (ISI). The total cash consideration related to this acquisition was
approximately $1.6 million. ISI is a wholly owned subsidiary of Insphere.
On June 25, 2010, the Company determined that it would wind down the current business of ISI
and related life agency sales offices located in Utah, Nevada and Arizona. After consideration of
the expected costs of developing the recently acquired ISI business and the belief that the
products and services available through ISI could be offered more efficiently to customers through
contractual arrangements with third parties at an appropriate time in the future, the Company
determined that a wind down of this business was necessary, and in the best interests of the
Company. The Company intends to maintain operations at ISI as necessary for an orderly transition
of customer accounts and completion of applicable business and regulatory requirements. The Company
intends to have this action substantially completed in November 2010. In September, the Company
filed Form BDW with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) and the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission and received notice that ISIs request to withdraw as a broker/dealer was
accepted and filed with FINRAs Central Registration Depository system on September 3, 2010.
The Company estimates that the total pre-tax expense expected to be incurred in connection
with this action will be approximately $2.4 million, consisting of approximately $700,000 in
employee termination costs, approximately $350,000 related to the write-down of fixed assets and
intangible assets, and approximately $1.4 million related to facility and operations termination
costs. The Company has expensed $2.3 million related to the wind down with approximately $1.6
million expense recorded during the three months ended September 30, 2010.
27
ITEM 2 MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
Cautionary Statements Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
In this report, unless the context otherwise requires, the terms Company, HealthMarkets,
we, us, or our refer to HealthMarkets, Inc. and its subsidiaries. This report and other
documents or oral presentations prepared or delivered by and on behalf of the Company contain or
may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the safe harbor provisions of the
United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are
statements based upon managements expectations at the time such statements are made. The Company
undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a
result of new information, future events or otherwise. Forward-looking statements are subject to
risks and uncertainties that could cause the Companys actual results to differ materially from
those contemplated in the statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the
forward-looking statements. All statements, other than statements of historical information
provided or incorporated by reference herein, may be deemed to be forward-looking statements.
Without limiting the foregoing, when used in written documents or oral presentations, the terms
anticipate, believe, estimate, expect, may, objective, plan, possible, potential,
project, will and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. In
addition to the assumptions and other factors referred to specifically in connection with such
statements, factors that could impact the Companys business and financial prospects include, but
are not limited to, those discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2009 under the caption Item 1 Business, Item 1A. Risk Factors and Item 7 Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and those discussed from
time to time in the Companys various filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission or in
other publicly disseminated written documents.
Introduction
HealthMarkets, Inc. is a holding company, the principal asset of which is its investment in
its wholly owned subsidiary, HealthMarkets, LLC. HealthMarkets, LLCs principal assets are its
investments in its separate operating subsidiaries, including its regulated insurance subsidiaries.
HealthMarkets conducts its insurance underwriting businesses through its indirect wholly owned
insurance company subsidiaries, The MEGA Life and Health Insurance Company (MEGA), Mid-West
National Life Insurance Company of Tennessee (Mid-West) and The Chesapeake Life Insurance Company
(Chesapeake), and conducts its insurance distribution business through its indirect insurance
agency subsidiary, Insphere Insurance Solutions, Inc. (Insphere)
Through our Commercial Health Division, we offer a broad range of health insurance products
for individuals, families, the self-employed and small businesses. Our plans are designed to
accommodate individual needs and include basic hospital-medical expense plans, plans with preferred
provider organization features, catastrophic hospital expense plans, as well as other supplemental
types of coverage. We market these products to the self-employed and individual markets through
independent agents contracted with Insphere. Certain recent developments with respect to the sale
of our health insurance plans are described below in the discussion of Health Insurance Product
Sales.
During 2009, the Company formed Insphere, a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary
of HealthMarkets, LLC. Insphere is a distribution company that specializes in meeting the life,
health, long-term care and retirement insurance needs of small businesses and middle-income
individuals and families through its portfolio of products from nationally recognized insurance
carriers. Insphere is an authorized agency in all 50 states and the District of
Columbia. As of October 2010, Insphere had approximately 2,700 independent agents, of which
approximately 1,800 on average write health insurance applications each month, and offices in over
35 states. Insphere distributes products underwritten by the Companys insurance company
subsidiaries, as well as non-affiliated insurance companies. Insphere has completed marketing
agreements with a number of non-affiliated life, health, long-term care and retirement insurance
carriers, including, but not limited to, Aetna, Humana and UnitedHealthcares Golden Rule Insurance
Company for individual health insurance products, John Hancock for long-term care products, ING for
term life, universal life and fixed annuity products and Minnesota Life Insurance Company for life
and fixed annuity products. Insphere also has a marketing arrangement with an intermediary under
which Inspheres agents obtain access to certain disability income insurance products.
Reclassification
Certain amounts in the 2009 financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the 2010
financial statement presentation.
28
Results of Operations
The table below sets forth certain summary information about the Companys operating results
for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
REVENUE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health premiums |
|
$ |
176,736 |
|
|
$ |
239,560 |
|
|
$ |
571,423 |
|
|
$ |
753,203 |
|
Life premiums and other considerations |
|
|
380 |
|
|
|
487 |
|
|
|
1,529 |
|
|
|
1,829 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
177,116 |
|
|
|
240,047 |
|
|
|
572,952 |
|
|
|
755,032 |
|
Investment income |
|
|
9,729 |
|
|
|
10,873 |
|
|
|
31,840 |
|
|
|
32,224 |
|
Other income |
|
|
18,838 |
|
|
|
15,064 |
|
|
|
49,377 |
|
|
|
47,841 |
|
Other-than-temporary impairment losses |
|
|
(765 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(765 |
) |
|
|
(4,078 |
) |
Realized gains, net |
|
|
1,225 |
|
|
|
795 |
|
|
|
3,866 |
|
|
|
2,350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
206,143 |
|
|
|
266,779 |
|
|
|
657,270 |
|
|
|
833,369 |
|
BENEFITS AND EXPENSES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits, claims, and settlement expenses |
|
|
57,605 |
|
|
|
126,042 |
|
|
|
279,353 |
|
|
|
435,721 |
|
Underwriting, acquisition, and insurance expenses |
|
|
39,765 |
|
|
|
80,867 |
|
|
|
138,432 |
|
|
|
260,143 |
|
Other expenses |
|
|
67,204 |
|
|
|
25,272 |
|
|
|
161,947 |
|
|
|
67,186 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
7,375 |
|
|
|
7,559 |
|
|
|
22,835 |
|
|
|
25,252 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
171,949 |
|
|
|
239,740 |
|
|
|
602,567 |
|
|
|
788,302 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before
income taxes |
|
|
34,194 |
|
|
|
27,039 |
|
|
|
54,703 |
|
|
|
45,067 |
|
Federal income taxes |
|
|
11,951 |
|
|
|
9,644 |
|
|
|
21,288 |
|
|
|
16,456 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
22,243 |
|
|
|
17,395 |
|
|
|
33,415 |
|
|
|
28,611 |
|
Income from discontinued operations, net |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
22,255 |
|
|
$ |
17,450 |
|
|
$ |
33,454 |
|
|
$ |
28,717 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Health Care Reform
In March 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and a reconciliation measure,
the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (collectively, the Health Care Reform
Legislation) were signed into law. The Health Care Reform Legislation will result in broad-based
material changes to the United States health care system. The Health Care Reform Legislation is
expected to significantly impact our financial conditions and results of operations, including but
not limited to the minimum medical loss ratio requirements applicable to our insurance subsidiaries
as well to third-party insurance carriers doing business with Insphere. Provisions of the Health
Care Reform Legislation become effective at various dates over the next several years and a number
of additional steps are required to implement these requirements, including, without limitation,
further guidance and clarification in the form of implementing regulations. Due to the complexity
of the Health Care Reform Legislation, the pending status of implementing regulations and lack of
interpretive guidance, and gradual implementation, the full impact of Health Care Reform
Legislation on our business is not yet fully known. However, we have started to dedicate material
resources and, in the future, expect to dedicate additional material resources and to incur
material expenses to implement Health Care Reform Legislation.
While not all-inclusive, we are evaluating the following material provisions of the Health
Care Reform Legislation to determine the impact that these provisions will have on our financial
conditions and results of operations:
|
|
|
establishment of a minimum medical loss ratio of 80% for the individual and small
group markets beginning in 2011, with rebates to customers required for medical loss
ratio amounts under the minimum; |
|
|
|
|
expansion of dependent coverage to include adult children up to age 26; |
|
|
|
|
elimination of most annual and all lifetime caps on the dollar value of benefits;
elimination of pre-existing condition exclusions; |
|
|
|
|
requirements that limit the ability of health insurance providers to vary premium
based on assessment of underlying risk; |
|
|
|
|
establishment of specific benefit design requirements, rating and pricing limits,
additional mandated benefits and guaranteed issue requirements; |
|
|
|
|
creation of health insurance exchanges with standardized plans and guarantee issue of
coverage for the individual and small group markets, which plans may be an attractive
option for our existing customers and cause them to cancel their coverage with us; |
|
|
|
|
prohibitions on certain policy rescissions; |
|
|
|
|
significant annual taxes and/or assessments on health insurance providers which may
not be deductible for income tax purposes; |
29
|
|
|
and limitation on the deductibility of executive compensation under Section 162(m) of
the Internal Revenue Code for health insurance providers. |
A number of these requirements could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition
and results of operations. In addition, a number of state legislatures have enacted or are
contemplating significant health insurance reforms, either in response to the Health Care Reform
Legislation or independently (to the extent not addressed by federal legislation). The Health Care
Reform Legislation, as well as state health insurance reforms, could increase our costs, require us
to revise the way in which we conduct business, result in the elimination of certain products or
business lines, lead to the lower revenues and expose us to an increased risk of liability. Any
delay or failure to conform our business to the requirements of the Health Care Reform Legislation
and state health insurance reforms could disrupt our operations, lead to regulatory issues, damage
our relationship with existing customers and our reputation generally, adversely affect our ability
to attract new customers and result in other adverse consequences.
With respect to the minimum loss ratio requirements effective beginning in 2011, we expect
that a mandated minimum loss ratio of 80% for the individual and small group markets will have a
material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations. Historically, the
Company has experienced significantly lower medical loss ratios, has not been able to price
premiums for its individual health insurance policies at this level and may not be able to operate
profitably at an 80% minimum medical loss ratio. The 80% minimum medical loss ratio is subject to
adjustment by HHS if HHS determines that the requirement is disruptive to the market. In addition,
rules addressing certain material aspects of this requirement have not yet been established,
including defining which expenses should be classified as medical and which should be classified as
non-medical for purposes of the calculation, as well as which taxes, fees and assessment may be
excluded from premium calculations. Subject to the outcome of final rulemaking, a minimum medical
loss ratio at or near the 80% level could, at an appropriate time in the future, compel us to
discontinue the underwriting and marketing of individual health insurance and/or to non-renew
coverage of our existing individual health customers in one or more states pursuant to applicable
state and federal requirements. This requirement may have a material adverse effect on the level
of base commissions and override commissions that Insphere receives from third party insurance
carriers. We believe that an 80% minimum medical loss ratio is significantly higher than the loss
ratios historically experienced by the third party health insurance carriers doing business with
Insphere. As a result, these carriers may reduce commissions, overrides and other administrative
expenses in order to comply with the minimum loss ratio requirements. At this time, we are not able
to project with certainty the extent to which the minimum medical loss ratio requirement will
impact our revenues and results of operations, but the impact is expected to be material.
The Companys review of the requirements of the Health Care Reform Legislation described
above, and its potential impact on the Companys health insurance product offerings, is ongoing.
See discussion of Health Insurance Product Sales below.
Health Insurance Product Sales
The Companys review of the requirements of the Health Care Reform Legislation described
above, and its potential impact on the Companys health insurance product offerings, is ongoing.
In addition, the Company continuously evaluates the sale by Insphere of third party products
underwritten by non-affiliated insurance carriers. In the states where such third party products
are available, they have, to a great extent, replaced the sale of the Companys own health
insurance products. In the first nine months of 2010, Inspheres sale of health insurance products
underwritten by United Healthcares Golden Rule Insurance Company and Aetna, in the aggregate,
exceeded the sale of the Companys products by nearly a seven-to-one margin. As a result of this
trend, in the second quarter of 2010, the Company determined that it would discontinue the sale of
the Companys traditional scheduled benefit health insurance products and significantly reduce
the number of states in which the Company will market all of its health insurance products in the
future. After September 23, 2010, the effective date for many aspects of the Health Care Reform
Legislation, the Company discontinued marketing its health insurance products in all but a limited
number of states in which Insphere does not currently have access to third-party health insurance
products. The Company expects to continue marketing and to place an increasing emphasis on its
supplemental product portfolio, which is generally not subject to the Health Care Reform
Legislation. This decision is not expected to affect the Companys in-force block of health
insurance business. However, the Company intends to make all adjustments to such in-force business
as may be required by the Health Care Reform Legislation or legislation that may be adopted in
certain states (such as California, Maine and Massachusetts) that could potentially require, in
such states, benefit modifications in the Companys in-force block of health insurance business.
30
Ratings
The Companys principal insurance subsidiaries historically have been assigned financial
strength ratings from A.M. Best Company (A.M. Best), Fitch Ratings (Fitch) and Standard &
Poors (S&P). These rating agencies have also assigned a credit or issuer default rating to
HealthMarkets, Inc. In the second quarter of 2010, the Company requested
that Fitch withdraw the insurer financial strength ratings of MEGA, Mid-West and Chesapeake
and the issuer default rating of the HealthMarkets, Inc., and requested that S&P withdraw the
counterparty credit and financial strength ratings of MEGA, Mid-West and Chesapeake and the
counterparty credit rating of HealthMarkets, Inc. Fitch and S&P subsequently withdrew these
ratings in accordance with the Companys request. The Companys request, which occurred after
ratings downgrades by Fitch and S&P, reflects the growing emphasis which the Company places on the
sale of third-party health insurance products underwritten by non-affiliated insurance carriers and
the belief that ratings from three separate ratings agencies are not necessary to support the sale
of health insurance products underwritten by the Companys principal insurance subsidiaries. The
ratings of the Company and its principal insurance subsidiaries by A.M. Best have been maintained.
In the second quarter of 2010, A.M. Best affirmed the financial strength ratings of MEGA, Mid-West
and Chesapeake, and the issuer credit rating of HealthMarkets, as set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
Mega
|
|
Financial Strength Rating
|
|
B++ (Good) |
Mid-West
|
|
Financial Strength Rating
|
|
B++ (Good) |
Chesapeake
|
|
Financial Strength Rating
|
|
B++ (Good) |
HealthMarkets, Inc.
|
|
Issuer Credit Rating
|
|
bb (Speculative) |
The A.M. Best ratings above carry a negative outlook.
In evaluating a company, independent rating agencies review such factors as the companys
capital adequacy, profitability, leverage and liquidity, book of business, quality and estimated
market value of assets, adequacy of policy liabilities, experience and competency of management and
operating profile. A.M. Bests financial strength ratings currently range from A++ (Superior)
to F (In Liquidation). A.M. Bests ratings are based upon factors relevant to policyholders,
agents, insurance brokers and intermediaries and are not directed to the protection of investors.
A.M. Bests issuer credit rating is a current opinion of an obligors ability to meet its senior
obligations. A.M. Bests issuer credit ratings range from aaa (Exceptional) to rs
(Regulatory Supervision/Liquidation).
Business Segments
The Company operates four business segments: the Insurance segment, Insphere, Corporate, and
Disposed Operations. The Insurance segment includes the Companys Commercial Health Division
(formerly the Self-Employed Agency Division). Insphere includes net commission revenue, agent
incentives, marketing costs and costs associated with the creation and development of Insphere.
Corporate includes investment income not allocated to the Insurance segment, realized gains or
losses, interest expense on corporate debt, the Companys student loan business, general expenses
relating to corporate operations and operations that do not constitute reportable operating
segments. Disposed Operations includes the remaining run out of the former Medicare Division and
the former Other Insurance Division as well as the residual operations from the disposition of
other businesses prior to 2009.
Allocations of investment income and certain general expenses are based on a number of
assumptions and estimates, and the business segments reported operating results would change if
different allocation methods were applied. Certain assets are not individually identifiable by
segment and, accordingly, have been allocated by formulas. Segment revenues include premiums and
other policy charges and considerations, net investment income, commission revenue, fees and other
income. Management does not allocate income taxes to segments. Transactions between reportable
segments are accounted for under respective agreements, which provide for such transactions
generally at cost.
Revenue from continuing operations, income from continuing operations before income taxes, and
assets by operating segment are set forth in the tables below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Revenue from continuing operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance Commercial Health Division: |
|
$ |
192,151 |
|
|
$ |
259,625 |
|
|
$ |
620,755 |
|
|
$ |
816,213 |
|
Insphere: |
|
|
11,511 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,524 |
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate: |
|
|
4,762 |
|
|
|
5,001 |
|
|
|
17,173 |
|
|
|
8,997 |
|
Intersegment Eliminations: |
|
|
(3,027 |
) |
|
|
(516 |
) |
|
|
(7,116 |
) |
|
|
(516 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues excluding disposed operations |
|
|
205,397 |
|
|
|
264,110 |
|
|
|
655,336 |
|
|
|
824,694 |
|
Disposed Operations: |
|
|
746 |
|
|
|
2,669 |
|
|
|
1,934 |
|
|
|
8,675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue from continuing operations |
|
$ |
206,143 |
|
|
$ |
266,779 |
|
|
$ |
657,270 |
|
|
$ |
833,369 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before federal income taxes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance Commercial Health Division: |
|
$ |
89,474 |
|
|
$ |
44,494 |
|
|
$ |
187,883 |
|
|
$ |
108,944 |
|
Insphere: |
|
|
(23,341 |
) |
|
|
(3,842 |
) |
|
|
(69,862 |
) |
|
|
(3,842 |
) |
Corporate: |
|
|
(33,088 |
) |
|
|
(16,744 |
) |
|
|
(65,326 |
) |
|
|
(53,163 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating income excluding disposed operations |
|
|
33,045 |
|
|
|
23,908 |
|
|
|
52,695 |
|
|
|
51,939 |
|
Disposed Operations |
|
|
1,149 |
|
|
|
3,131 |
|
|
|
2,008 |
|
|
|
(6,872 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income from continuing operations before federal income taxes |
|
$ |
34,194 |
|
|
$ |
27,039 |
|
|
$ |
54,703 |
|
|
$ |
45,067 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Health Division
Set forth below is certain summary financial and operating data for the Companys Commercial
Health Division for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earned premium revenue |
|
$ |
176,816 |
|
|
$ |
237,937 |
|
|
$ |
572,367 |
|
|
$ |
748,468 |
|
Investment income |
|
|
5,916 |
|
|
|
6,311 |
|
|
|
17,089 |
|
|
|
20,510 |
|
Other income |
|
|
9,419 |
|
|
|
15,377 |
|
|
|
31,299 |
|
|
|
47,235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
192,151 |
|
|
|
259,625 |
|
|
|
620,755 |
|
|
|
816,213 |
|
Benefits and Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit expenses |
|
|
58,554 |
|
|
|
127,545 |
|
|
|
281,528 |
|
|
|
425,330 |
|
Underwriting and policy acquisition expenses |
|
|
40,828 |
|
|
|
79,384 |
|
|
|
139,460 |
|
|
|
255,372 |
|
Other expenses |
|
|
3,295 |
|
|
|
8,202 |
|
|
|
11,884 |
|
|
|
26,567 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
102,677 |
|
|
|
215,131 |
|
|
|
432,872 |
|
|
|
707,269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
89,474 |
|
|
$ |
44,494 |
|
|
$ |
187,883 |
|
|
$ |
108,944 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss ratio |
|
|
33.1 |
% |
|
|
53.6 |
% |
|
|
49.2 |
% |
|
|
56.8 |
% |
Expense ratio |
|
|
23.1 |
% |
|
|
33.4 |
% |
|
|
24.4 |
% |
|
|
34.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined ratio |
|
|
56.2 |
% |
|
|
87.0 |
% |
|
|
73.6 |
% |
|
|
90.9 |
% |
Submitted annualized volume |
|
$ |
10,337 |
|
|
$ |
75,633 |
|
|
$ |
48,827 |
|
|
$ |
277,864 |
|
Loss Ratio. The loss ratio is defined as benefits expense as a percentage of earned premium
revenue.
Expense Ratio. The expense ratio is defined as underwriting, acquisition and insurance
expenses as a percentage of earned premium revenue.
Submitted Annualized Volume. Submitted annualized premium volume in any period is the
aggregate annualized premium amount associated with health insurance applications submitted
by the Companys agents in such period for underwriting by the Companys insurance
subsidiaries.
Three Months Ended September 30, 2010 versus 2009
The Commercial Health Division reported earned premium revenue of $176.8 million during the
three months ended September 30, 2010 compared to $237.9 million in the corresponding period of
2009, a decrease of $61.1 million or 26%, which is due to a decrease in policies in force. The
decrease in policies in force reflects an attrition rate that exceeds the pace of new sales, and is
evident in the reduction in submitted annualized premium volume for business written by the
Companys insurance subsidiaries, from $75.6 million in 2009 to $10.3 million in 2010, due
primarily to the distribution of products underwritten by non-affiliated carriers.
The Commercial Health Division reported operating income of $89.5 million in 2010 compared to
operating income of $44.5 million in 2009, an increase of $45.0 million or 101%. Operating income
as a percentage of earned premium revenue (i.e., operating margin) for 2010 was 50.6% compared to
the operating margin of 18.7% in 2009, which is generally attributable to a decrease in the loss
ratio, as discussed below, and a decrease in underwriting, acquisition and insurance expenses.
The loss ratio for the quarter reflects an update to the completion factors used at the end of
the third quarter of 2010 to reflect more recent patterns of claim payments. The majority of the
Companys claim liabilities are estimated using the developmental method, which involves the use of
completion factors for most incurral months, supplemented with additional estimation techniques,
such as loss ratio estimates, in the most recent incurral months. This method applies completion
factors to claim payments in order to estimate the ultimate amount of the claim. These completion
factors are derived from historical experience and are dependent on the incurred dates of the
claim, as well as the dates a payment is made against the claim. Through September 2010, the
Company has seen an ongoing decrease in the time period from incurral to payment of a claim,
resulting in higher completion factors and lower reserves. In response to these trends, in the
third quarter of 2010, the Company used more recent experience to develop the completion factors
for the current reporting period, resulting in a decrease in claim liabilities of $30.6 million
recognized during the three months ended September 30, 2010. The Company will continue to evaluate
and update completion factors on an ongoing basis, as appropriate, and will evaluate the impact (if
any) that Health Care Reform Legislation may have on the completion factors. The decrease in loss
ratio for the quarter also reflects the Companys refinement of a previously estimated claims
liability, established in the fourth quarter of 2009, arising from a review of claim processing for
state mandated benefits. As a result of this refinement, during the three months ended September
30, 2010, the Company recognized a decrease in claim liabilities of $15.9 million. Excluding the
adjustments for completion factors and the refinement described above, the loss ratio for the
quarter would have been approximately 59.4%.
Underwriting, acquisition and insurance expenses decreased by $38.6 million, or 49%, to $40.8
million in 2010 from $79.4 million in 2009. This decrease reflects the variable nature of
commission expenses and premium taxes included in these amounts which generally vary in proportion
to earned premium revenue. Beginning in the fourth quarter of 2008, we initiated certain cost
reduction programs which are being reflected as a decrease in the expense ratio. Furthermore, due
to the commencement of the sale of the third-party health insurance products underwritten by
non-affiliated insurance carriers, the average policy duration of the existing HealthMarkets
carriers business has increased, which has caused a decrease in the overall effective commission
rate. Generally, first year commission rates paid to agents are higher than renewal year commission
rates.
Other income and other expenses both decreased in the current period compared to the prior
year period. Other income largely consists of fee and other income received for sales of
association memberships by our independent agent sales force for which other expenses are incurred
for bonuses and other compensation provided to the agents. Sales of association memberships by our
independent agent sales force tend to move in tandem with sales of health insurance policies;
consequently, this decrease in other income and other expense is consistent with the decline in
earned premium.
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 versus 2009
The Commercial Health Division reported earned premium revenue of $572.4 million during the
nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to $748.5 million in the corresponding period of
2009, a decrease of $176.1 million or 23.6%, which is due to a decrease in policies in force. The
decrease in policies in force reflects an attrition rate that exceeds the pace of new sales, and is
evident in the reduction in submitted annualized premium volume for business written by the
Companys insurance subsidiaries, from $277.9 million in 2009 to $48.8 million in 2010, due
primarily to the distribution of products underwritten by non-affiliated carriers.
The Commercial Health Division reported operating income of $187.9 million in 2010 compared to
operating income of $108.9 million in 2009, an increase of $79.0 million or 72.5%. Operating margin
for 2010 was 32.8% compared to the operating margin of 14.6% in 2009, which is generally
attributable to a decrease in the loss ratio and a decrease in underwriting, acquisition and
insurance expenses.
The loss ratio reflects an update to the completion factors used at the end of the third
quarter of 2010 to reflect more recent patterns of claim payments. In response to these claim
payment trends, in the third quarter of 2010, the Company used more recent experience to develop
the completion factors, resulting in a decrease in claim liabilities of $30.6 million recognized
during the three months ended September 30, 2010. The decrease in loss ratio also reflects the
Companys refinement of a previously estimated claims liability, established in the fourth quarter
of 2009, arising from a review of claim processing for state mandated benefits. As a result of
this refinement, during the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company recognized a decrease
in claim liabilities of $19.6 million. Excluding the adjustments for completion factors and the
refinement described above, the loss ratio for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 would have
been approximately 58.0%.
Underwriting, acquisition and insurance expenses decreased by $115.9 million, or 45.5%, to
$139.5 million in 2010 from $255.4 million in 2009. This decrease reflects the variable nature of
commission expenses and premium taxes included in these amounts which generally vary in proportion
to earned premium revenue. We initiated certain cost reduction programs beginning in the fourth
quarter of 2008, which are being reflected as a decrease in the expense ratio. Furthermore, due to
the commencement of the sale of the third-party health insurance products underwritten by
non-affiliated insurance carriers, the average policy duration of the existing HealthMarkets
carriers business has increased, which has caused a decrease in the overall effective commission
rate. Generally, first year commission rates paid to agents are higher than renewal year commission
rates.
33
Other income and other expenses both decreased in the current period compared to the prior
year period. Other income largely consists of fee and other income received for sales of
association memberships by our independent agent
sales force for which other expenses are incurred for bonuses and other compensation provided
to the agents. Sales of association memberships by our independent agent sales force tend to move
in tandem with sales of health insurance policies; consequently, this decrease in other income and
other expense is consistent with the decline in earned premium.
Insphere
During the second quarter of 2009, we formed Insphere, an authorized insurance agency in 50
states and the District of Columbia specializing in small business and middle-income market life,
health, long-term care and retirement insurance. Insphere distributes products underwritten by our
insurance subsidiaries, as well as non-affiliated insurance companies.
Set forth below is certain summary financial and operating data for Insphere for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commission revenue |
|
$ |
10,014 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
21,647 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Investment income |
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
247 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other income |
|
|
1,358 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,630 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
11,511 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,524 |
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commission expenses |
|
|
6,166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,776 |
|
|
|
|
|
Agent incentives |
|
|
6,167 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
18,990 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
Other expenses |
|
|
22,519 |
|
|
|
3,687 |
|
|
|
62,620 |
|
|
|
3,687 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
34,852 |
|
|
|
3,842 |
|
|
|
94,386 |
|
|
|
3,842 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss |
|
$ |
(23,341 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,842 |
) |
|
$ |
(69,862 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,842 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010
Insphere generates revenue primarily from base commissions and override commissions received
from insurance carriers whose policies are purchased through Inspheres independent agents. The
commissions are typically based on a percentage of the premiums paid by insureds to the carrier.
In some instances, Insphere also receives bonus payments for achieving certain sales volume
thresholds. Insphere typically receives commission payments on a monthly basis for as long as a
policy remains active. As a result, much of our revenue for a given financial reporting period
relates to policies sold prior to the beginning of the period and is recurring in nature.
Commission rates are dependent on a number of factors, including the type of insurance product and
the particular insurance company underwriting the policy. During the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2010, the Company earned commission revenue of approximately $10.0 million and $21.6
million, respectively, of which $1.6 million and $3.0 million were generated from the sale of
insurance products underwritten by the Companys insurance subsidiaries.
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, Insphere reported other expenses of
$22.5 million and $62.6 million, respectively. Other expenses associated with Insphere are related
to employee compensation, lead costs, costs associated with our new field offices and other
expenses related to the continued development of Insphere.
During the three months ended September 30, 2010 the Company made the decision to consolidate
some of its agent sales offices and therefore closed 22 leased facilities. During this period
Insphere recorded a lease impairment charge in the amount of $1.2 million. Additionally, the
Insphere business segment incurred costs during the quarter of $961,000 (excluding lease
impairments) for the wind-down of Insphere Securities, Inc. related to employee termination costs,
write-down of fixed assets and intangible assets and operations termination costs. These charges
are reflected in Other expenses in the table above.
Corporate
Corporate includes investment income not otherwise allocated to the Insurance segment,
realized gains and losses on sales, interest expense on corporate debt, the Companys student loan
business, general expense relating to corporate operations and operations that do not constitute
reportable operating segments.
34
Set forth below is a summary of the components of operating income (loss) at Corporate
for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Operating income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment income on equity |
|
$ |
3,220 |
|
|
$ |
2,969 |
|
|
$ |
10,737 |
|
|
$ |
6,703 |
|
Net investment impairment losses recognized in earnings |
|
|
(765 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(765 |
) |
|
|
(4,078 |
) |
Realized gains, net |
|
|
1,225 |
|
|
|
795 |
|
|
|
3,866 |
|
|
|
2,350 |
|
Interest expense on corporate debt |
|
|
(7,375 |
) |
|
|
(7,559 |
) |
|
|
(22,835 |
) |
|
|
(24,386 |
) |
Student loan operations |
|
|
(64 |
) |
|
|
(279 |
) |
|
|
(185 |
) |
|
|
(258 |
) |
General corporate expenses and other |
|
|
(29,329 |
) |
|
|
(12,670 |
) |
|
|
(56,144 |
) |
|
|
(33,494 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss |
|
$ |
(33,088 |
) |
|
$ |
(16,744 |
) |
|
$ |
(65,326 |
) |
|
$ |
(53,163 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2010 versus 2009
Corporate reported an operating loss in 2010 of $33.1 million compared to $16.7 million in
2009 for an overall increase in the operating loss of $16.4 million. The change in operating loss
is primarily due to the following items:
|
|
|
The Company recognized an impairment loss of $765,000 on one of its investments
during the three months ended September 30, 2010. The Company did not incur any
investment impairments during the three months ended September 30, 2009. The
impairment charge resulted from other than temporary reductions in the fair value of
the investment compared to the cost basis. |
|
|
|
General corporate expenses and other increased by $16.7 million from the prior
year. The increases in the expenses are primarily due to severance of $4.9 million,
acceleration of stock awards expense of $8.4 and other compensation of $1.9 million
associated with the previously announced changes to the Companys executive
management team. |
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 versus 2009
Corporate reported an operating loss in 2010 of $65.3 million compared to $53.2 million in
2009 for an overall increase in operating loss of $12.2 million. The change in operating loss is
primarily due to the following items:
|
|
|
Investment income on equity increased by $4.0 million due to additional investment
income earned on the Companys equity method investments and the additional
investment income of $3.7 million recognized in 2010 from the consolidation of
Grapevine into the Companys results of operations. |
|
|
|
|
Net investment impairment losses recognized in earnings decreased by $3.3 million
during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared the prior year period. The
Company recognized impairment losses of $765,000 on other-than-temporary impairments
on one security during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to
impairment losses of $4.1 million on 3 securities during the same period in 2009. The
impairment charges resulted from other than temporary reductions in the fair value of
these investments compared to the cost basis (see Note 3 of Notes to Consolidated
Condensed Financial Statements for additional information). |
|
|
|
|
Interest expense on corporate debt decreased by $1.6 million, from $24.4 million
during the nine months ended September 30, 2009, to $22.8 million during the nine
months ended September 30, 2010. This decrease is due to a lower interest rate
environment in 2010 compared to 2009. However, partially offsetting this decrease was
the additional interest expense of $3.6 million incurred during 2010 associated with
the debt related to Grapevine. |
|
|
|
|
General corporate expenses and other increased by $22.7 million from the prior
year. The increases in the expenses are mainly due to an increase in employee
termination cost of $5.0 million as the Company continues to align the workforce to
current business levels. In addition, the Company incurred an increase in the expense
primarily due to severance and stock based compensation expenses of $15.1 million
associated with the previously announced changes to the Companys executive
management team. |
35
The Company expects net investment income to decrease over the next eighteen months due to
cash received from the maturity of higher yielding fixed income securities being reinvested into
cash and short term investments to facilitate the repayment of the term loan maturing in 2012.
Disposed Operations
Our Disposed Operations segment includes our former Medicare Division and our former Other
Insurance Division, as well as the disposition of other businesses prior to 2009.
The table below sets forth income (loss) for our Disposed Operations for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Income (loss) from Disposed
Operations before federal income
taxes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medicare Insurance Division |
|
$ |
250 |
|
|
$ |
2,584 |
|
|
$ |
811 |
|
|
$ |
(7,743 |
) |
Other Insurance Division |
|
|
898 |
|
|
|
739 |
|
|
|
1,233 |
|
|
|
3,153 |
|
Life Insurance Division |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
(191 |
) |
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
(2,458 |
) |
Other disposed operations |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Disposed Operations |
|
$ |
1,149 |
|
|
$ |
3,131 |
|
|
$ |
2,008 |
|
|
$ |
(6,872 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Consolidated Operations
Historically, the Companys primary sources of cash on a consolidated basis have been premium
revenue from policies issued, investment income, and fees and other income. The primary uses of
cash have been payments for benefits, claims and commissions under those policies, servicing of the
Companys debt obligations, and operating expenses.
The Company has entered into several financing agreements designed to strengthen both its
capital base and liquidity, the most significant of which are described below. The following table
also sets forth additional information with respect to the Companys debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate at |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
Maturity Date |
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2006 credit agreement: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term loan |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
|
1.538 |
%(a) |
|
$ |
362,500 |
|
|
$ |
362,500 |
|
$75 million revolver |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grapevine Note |
|
|
2021 |
|
|
|
6.712 |
% |
|
|
72,350 |
|
|
|
|
|
Trust preferred securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UICI Capital Trust I |
|
|
2034 |
|
|
|
3.876 |
%(a) |
|
|
15,470 |
|
|
|
15,470 |
|
HealthMarkets Capital Trust I |
|
|
2036 |
|
|
|
3.342 |
%(a) |
|
|
51,550 |
|
|
|
51,550 |
|
HealthMarkets Capital Trust II |
|
|
2036 |
|
|
|
8.367 |
%(a) |
|
|
51,550 |
|
|
|
51,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
553,420 |
|
|
$ |
481,070 |
|
Student Loan Credit Facility |
|
|
(b |
) |
|
|
0.000 |
%(c) |
|
|
70,400 |
|
|
|
77,350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
623,820 |
|
|
$ |
558,420 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
See Note 7 of Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements. |
|
(b) |
|
The Series 2001A-1 Notes and Series 2001A-2 Notes have a final stated maturity
of July 1, 2036; the Series 2002A Notes have a final stated maturity of July 1, 2037.
See Note 7 of Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements. |
|
(c) |
|
The interest rate on each series of notes resets monthly in a Dutch auction
process. See Note 7 of Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements for
additional information on the Student Loan Credit Facility. |
In April 2006, the Company borrowed $500.0 million under a term loan credit facility and
issued $100.0 million of Floating Rate Junior Subordinated Notes (see Note 7 of Notes to
Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements).
We regularly monitor our liquidity position, including cash levels, credit line, principal
investment commitments, interest and principal payments on debt, capital expenditures and matters
relating to liquidity and to compliance with regulatory requirements. We maintain a line of credit
in excess of anticipated liquidity requirements. As of September 30, 2010, HealthMarkets had a
$75.0 million unused line of credit, of which $67.9 million was available to the Company. The
unavailable balance of $7.1 million relates to letters of credit outstanding with the Companys
insurance operations.
36
Holding Company
HealthMarkets, Inc. is a holding company, the principal asset of which is its investment in
its wholly owned subsidiary, HealthMarkets, LLC (collectively referred to as the holding
company). The holding companys ability to fund its cash requirements is largely dependent upon
its ability to access cash, by means of dividends or other means, from its separate operating
subsidiaries, including its regulated insurance subsidiaries and Insphere.
Domestic insurance companies require prior approval by insurance regulatory authorities for
the payment of dividends that exceed certain limitations based on statutory surplus and net income.
During 2010, based on the 2009 statutory net income and statutory capital and surplus levels, the
Companys domestic insurance companies are eligible to pay, without prior approval of the
regulatory authorities, aggregate dividends in the ordinary course of business to HealthMarkets,
LLC of approximately $97.9 million. During the second quarter of 2010, one of the Companys
domestic insurance companies paid ordinary dividends totaling $49.5 million leaving a remaining
amount for ordinary dividends of $48.4 million available on December 31, 2010.
As it has done in the past, the Company will continue to assess the results of operations of
the regulated domestic insurance companies to determine the prudent dividend capability of the
subsidiaries. This is consistent with our practice of maintaining risk-based capital ratios at each
of our domestic insurance subsidiaries significantly in excess of minimum requirements.
HealthMarkets, LLC provides working capital to its wholly-owned subsidiary, Insphere, pursuant
to a $50 million Loan Agreement dated August 24, 2009. The Loan Agreement was amended on April 30,
2010, to increase the amount from $50 million to $100 million. As of September 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, Insphere had an outstanding balance owed to HealthMarkets, LLC of $69.2 million
and $19.6 million, respectively.
At September 30, 2010, HealthMarkets, Inc. and HealthMarket, LLC, in the aggregate, held cash
and cash equivalents in the amount of $125.7 million.
Contractual Obligations and Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
A summary of HealthMarkets contractual obligations is included in the Companys Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,2009. There have been no material changes in the
Companys contractual obligations or off balance sheet commitments since December 31, 2009.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The Companys discussion and analysis of its financial condition and results of operations are
based on its consolidated condensed financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance
with United States generally accepted accounting principles. The preparation of these consolidated
condensed financial statements requires the Company to make estimates and judgments that affect the
reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent
assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, the Company evaluates its estimates, including those
related to the valuation of assets and liabilities requiring fair value estimates, including
investments and allowance for bad debts, the amount of health and life insurance claims and
liabilities, the realization of deferred acquisition costs, the carrying value of goodwill and
intangible assets, the amortization period of intangible assets, stock-based compensation plan
forfeitures, the realization of deferred taxes, reserves for contingencies, including reserves for
losses in connection with unresolved legal matters and other matters that affect the reported
amounts and disclosure of contingencies in the financial statements. The Company bases its
estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be
reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about
the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.
Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
Reference is made to the discussion of these critical accounting policies and estimates contained
in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 under the caption
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates.
Impact
on Medical Loss Ratio from Update of Completion Factors
The majority of the Companys claim liabilities are estimated using the developmental method,
which involves the use of completion factors for most incurral months, supplemented with additional
estimation techniques, such as loss ratio estimates, in the most recent incurral months. This
method applies completion factors to claim payments in order to estimate the ultimate amount of the
claim. These completion factors are derived from historical experience and are dependent on the
incurred dates of the claim, as well as the dates a payment is made against the claim.
The loss ratio for the quarter reflects an update to the completion factors used at the end of
the third quarter of 2010 to reflect more recent patterns of claim payments. Through September
2010, the Company has seen an ongoing decrease in the time period from incurral to payment of a
claim, resulting in higher completion factors and lower reserves. In response to these trends, in
the third quarter, the Company used more recent experience to develop the completion factors,
resulting in a decrease in claim liabilities of $30.6 million recognized during the three months
ended September 30, 2010. The Company will continue to evaluate and update completion factors on an
ongoing basis, as appropriate, and will evaluate the impact, if any, that Health Care Reform
Legislation may have on the completion factors.
The decrease in loss ratio for the quarter also reflects the Companys refinement of a
previously estimated claim liability, established in the fourth quarter of 2009, arising from a
review of claim processing for state mandated benefits. As a result of this refinement, during the
three months ended September 30, 2010, the Company recognized a decrease in claim liabilities of
$15.9 million.
Amortization of Intangible Assets 2010 Change in Estimate
Other intangible assets include the acquisition of the right to certain renewal commissions
from Special Investment Risks, Ltd (SIR). Previously, SIR sold health insurance policies that
were either issued by a third-party insurance company and coinsured by the Company, or policies
that were issued directly by the Company. Effective January 1, 1997, the Company acquired the
agency force of SIR, and in accordance with the terms of the asset sale agreement, SIR retained the
right to receive certain commissions and renewal commissions. On May 19, 2006, the Company and SIR
entered into a
termination agreement, pursuant to which SIR received an aggregate of $47.5 million from the
Company and all future commission payments owed to SIR under the asset sale agreement were
discharged in full.
37
On January 1, 2010, the Company transferred a portion of the intangible asset related to SIR
from the Commercial Health Division to Insphere as a result of the reorganization of the Companys
agent sales force and the launch of Insphere, with which these agents are now associated. At the
time of such transfer, the Company re-evaluated the amortization periods recorded in both the
Commercial Health Division and Insphere. Based on such evaluation, the Company determined that the
portion related to Insphere should continue to be amortized through 2029. The Company also
determined that due to the decrease in the number of health policies issued through the Commercial
Health Division, the portion of the intangible asset that remains with the Commercial Health
Division will be amortized over a remaining period of 60 months. These changes resulted in an
increase in Underwriting, insurance and acquisition expense on the consolidated condensed
statement of income of $315,000 and $1.2 million for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2010. The Company recorded amortization expense associated with other intangible assets of
$696,000 and $2.3 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively.
Student Loans
In connection with the Companys exit from the Life Insurance Division business,
HealthMarkets, LLC entered into a definitive Stock Purchase Agreement (as amended, the Stock
Purchase Agreement) pursuant to which Wilton Reassurance Company or its affiliates (Wilton)
agreed to purchase the Companys student loan funding vehicles, CFLD-I, Inc. (CFLD-I) and UICI
Funding Corp. 2 (UFC2), and the related student association. The Stock Purchase Agreement was
terminated in 2009 and the closing of this transaction did not occur. In accordance with the terms
of the Coinsurance Agreements, Wilton will fund student loans; provided, however, that Wilton will
not be required to fund any student loan that would cause the aggregate par value of all such loans
funded by Wilton, following the Coinsurance Effective Date, to exceed $10.0 million. As of
September 30, 2010, approximately $1.9 million of student loans have been funded.
Regulatory and Legislative Matters
The business of insurance is primarily regulated by the states and is also affected by a range
of legislative developments at the state and federal levels. Recently adopted legislation and
regulations may have a significant impact on the Companys business and future results of
operations. Reference is made to the discussion under the caption Business Regulatory and
Legislative Matters in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2009. See Note 10 of Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements.
|
|
|
ITEM 3. |
|
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
The Company has not experienced significant changes related to its market risk exposures
during the quarter ended September 30, 2010. Reference is made to the information contained in the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 in Item 7A
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company maintains a set of disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that
information required to be disclosed in reports that it files or submits under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms. In addition, the
disclosure controls and procedures ensure that information required to be disclosed is accumulated
and communicated to management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial
officer, allowing timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Under the supervision and with
the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal
financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such
term is defined under Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Exchange Act. Based on this evaluation,
our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure
controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly
report.
38
Change in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There has been no change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting during the
Companys most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Company is a party to various material legal proceedings, which are described in Note 10
of Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements included herein and/or in the Companys
Annual Report on Form 10-K filed for the year ended December 31, 2009 under the caption Item 3.
Legal Proceedings. The Company and its subsidiaries are parties to various other pending legal
proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business, including some asserting significant
damages arising from claims under insurance policies, disputes with agents and other matters. Based
in part upon the opinion of counsel as to the ultimate disposition of such lawsuits and claims,
management believes that the liability, if any, resulting from the disposition of such proceedings,
after consideration of applicable reserves and/or potentially available insurance coverage
benefits, will not be material to the Companys consolidated financial condition or results of
operations. Except as discussed in Note 10 of the Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial
Statements included herein, during the three month period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q, the Company has not been named in any new material legal proceeding, and there have been no
material developments in the previously reported legal proceedings.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Reference is made to the risk factors discussed in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009 in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors, as updated by our
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 and the quarter ended June 30,
2010 (collectively the Quarterly Reports) which could materially affect the Companys business,
financial condition or future results. The risks described in the Companys Annual Report on Form
10-K, as updated by the Quarterly Reports, are not the only risks the Company faces. Additional
risks and uncertainties not currently known to the Company or that the Company currently deems to
be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or
operating results.
The Company has not experienced material changes to the risk factors disclosed in its Annual
Report on Form 10-K, as updated by the Quarterly Reports, except that we have modified the risk
factor relating to the material amount of our outstanding debt, as set forth below.
We have a material amount of debt outstanding that contains restrictive covenants and our
inability to service and repay our debt obligations could have a material adverse effect on our
financial condition and results of operations
We have a material amount of debt outstanding (see Note 7 of Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements). In connection with the Merger on April 5, 2006, HealthMarkets, LLC entered into a
credit agreement providing for, among other things, a $500 million term loan facility. The term
loan facility will expire on April 5, 2012. At September 30, 2010, $362.5 million remained
outstanding on the term loan facility, which indebtedness bears interest at the London inter-bank
offered rate (LIBOR) plus a borrowing margin of 1.00%. Our indebtedness could have an adverse
effect on our business and future operations, including requiring us to dedicate a substantial
portion of cash flow from operations to pay principal and interest on our debt, which would reduce
funds available to fund working capital, capital expenditures and general operating requirements;
increasing our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions or a downturn in
our business; placing us at a competitive disadvantage compared to competitors that have less debt;
limiting our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the industry
in which we operate; and impairing our ability to obtain additional financing in the future for
working capital, capital expenditures or general corporate purposes. In addition, the credit
agreement requires us to comply with various covenants that impose restrictions on our operations,
including our ability to incur additional indebtedness, make investments or other restricted
payments, sell or otherwise dispose of assets and engage in certain other activities. The credit
agreement also establishes a number of financial covenants, including maximum total leverage ratio
requirements and minimum adjusted statutory surplus requirements. The restrictive covenants under
our credit agreement could restrict our ability to pursue our business strategies. Any failure to
comply with these restrictive covenants could result in an event of default under the credit
agreement which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of
operations. We believe that we will be in position to repay the term loan facility at maturity.
However, our ability to repay this facility depends upon certain factors beyond our control,
including receipt of regulatory approvals required to access capital from our insurance
subsidiaries through extraordinary
39
dividends. In addition, we cannot fully anticipate the future condition of the Company or the
credit markets and we may have unexpected costs and liabilities. There can be no assurance that we
will be successful in our efforts to repay the terms loan facility or, in the absence of repayment,
renew, extend or refinance our debt, and if we are not successful, our liquidity and financial
condition would be significantly adversely impacted. If it becomes necessary to renew, extend or
refinance our debt, due to our credit rating, the current economic conditions or the credit market
environment, we may not be able to do so and, if we are able to do so, the terms are expected to be
less favorable than those of the current term loan facility and may impose additional financial
risks to our financial condition and results of operations.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
During the quarter ended September 30, 2010, the Company issued an aggregate of 76,140
unregistered shares of its Class A-1 common stock to an executive officer of the Company. In
particular, an executive officer of the Company purchased 76,140 shares of the Companys Class A-1
common stock for aggregate consideration of $558,867.60 (or $7.34 per share). Such sale of
securities was made in reliance upon the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(2) of
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (and/or Regulation D promulgated thereunder) for
transactions by an issuer not involving a public offering. The proceeds of such sale were used for
general corporate purposes.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The following table sets forth the Companys purchases of HealthMarkets, Inc. Class A-1 common
stock during each of the months in the three months ended September 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of Shares |
|
|
Maximum Number of Shares |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Average Price |
|
|
Purchased as Part of Publicly |
|
|
That May Yet Be Purchased |
|
Period |
|
Purchased(1) |
|
|
Paid per Share ($) |
|
|
Announced Plans or Programs |
|
|
Under The Plan or Program |
|
7/1/10 to 7/31/10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8/1/10 to 8/31/10 |
|
|
5,723 |
|
|
$ |
7.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/1/10 to 9/30/10 |
|
|
14,925 |
|
|
|
7.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
|
20,648 |
|
|
$ |
7.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The number of shares purchased other than through a publicly announced plan or program includes 20,648 shares purchased from
former or current employees of the Company. |
The following table sets forth the Companys purchases of HealthMarkets, Inc. Class A-2
common stock during each of the months in the three months ended September 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased as Part of |
|
|
Maximum Number of Shares |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Average Price |
|
|
Publicly Announced Plans |
|
|
That May Yet Be Purchased |
|
Period |
|
Purchased(1) |
|
|
Paid per Share ($) |
|
|
or Programs |
|
|
Under The Plan or Program |
|
7/1/10 to 7/31/10 |
|
|
2,578 |
|
|
$ |
7.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8/1/10 to 8/31/10 |
|
|
59,302 |
|
|
|
7.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/1/10 to 9/30/10 |
|
|
29,295 |
|
|
|
7.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
|
91,175 |
|
|
$ |
7.33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The number of shares purchased other than through a publicly announced plan or program includes 91,175 shares purchased
from former or current participants of the stock accumulation plan established for the benefit of the Companys insurance
agents. |
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
40
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
(a) Exhibits.
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
10.1
|
|
Letter Agreement, dated as of August 27, 2010, amending
the terms of the Employment Agreement between
HealthMarkets, Inc. and Steven P. Erwin, filed as Exhibit
10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 27,
2010, File No. 001-14953, and incorporated by reference
herein. |
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Employment Agreement, effective as of September 24, 2010,
between HealthMarkets, Inc. and Kenneth Fasola, filed as
Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated
September 24, 2010, File No. 001-14953, and incorporated
by reference herein. |
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement, effective as of
September 27, 2010, between HealthMarkets, Inc. and
Kenneth Fasola, filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Current
Report on Form 8-K dated September 24, 2010, File No.
001-14953, and incorporated by reference herein. |
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
Restricted Share Agreement, effective as of September 27,
2010, between HealthMarkets, Inc. and Kenneth Fasola,
filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Current Report on Form 8-K
dated September 24, 2010, File No. 001-14953, and
incorporated by reference herein. |
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
Form of Subscription Agreement between HealthMarkets, Inc.
and Kenneth Fasola, filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Current
Report on Form 8-K dated September 24, 2010, File No.
001-14953, and incorporated by reference herein. |
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
Transition Agreement, effective as of September 27, 2010,
between HealthMarkets, Inc. and Phillip J. Hildebrand,
filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Current Report on Form 8-K
dated September 24, 2010, File No. 001-14953, and
incorporated by reference herein. |
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated as of October 26, 2010,
between HealthMarkets, Inc. and B. Curtis Westen filed as
Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated
October 26, 2010, File No. 001-14953, and incorporated by
reference herein. |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification, executed by
Phillip J. Hildebrand, Chief Executive Officer of
HealthMarkets, Inc. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification, executed by K.
Alec Mahmood, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of HealthMarkets, Inc. |
|
|
|
32
|
|
Certifications required by Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule
15d-14(b) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of
the United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350), executed by
Phillip J. Hildebrand, Chief Executive Officer of
HealthMarkets, Inc. and K. Alec Mahmood, Senior Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of HealthMarkets,
Inc. |
41
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
HEALTHMARKETS, INC
(Registrant)
|
|
Date: November 11, 2010 |
/s/ Phillip J. Hildebrand
|
|
|
Phillip J. Hildebrand |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: November 11, 2010 |
/s/ K. Alec Mahmood
|
|
|
K. Alec Mahmood |
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
42