e10vk
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-K
|
|
|
(Mark One)
|
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the fiscal
year ended September 30, 2010
|
OR
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to
|
Commission file number 0-27038
NUANCE COMMUNICATIONS,
INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as
Specified in its Charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
94-3156479
|
(State or Other Jurisdiction
of
Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
1 Wayside Road
Burlington, Massachusetts
(Address of Principal
Executive Offices)
|
|
01803
(Zip
Code)
|
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
(781) 565-5000
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE
ACT:
|
|
|
Title of Each Class
|
|
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value
|
|
NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
|
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE
ACT:
None
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has
filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
(§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit and post such
files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of Registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in Rule
12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
Large
accelerated
filer þ
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
Smaller
reporting
company o
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of the outstanding common equity held
by non-affiliates of the Registrant as of the last business day
of the Registrants most recently completed second fiscal
quarter was approximately $3.8 billion based upon the last
reported sales price on the Nasdaq National Market for such
date. For purposes of this disclosure, shares of Common Stock
held by officers and directors of the Registrant and by persons
who hold more than 5% of the outstanding Common Stock have been
excluded because such persons may be deemed to be affiliates.
This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily
conclusive.
The number of shares of the Registrants Common Stock,
outstanding as of October 31, 2010, was 298,191,105.
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Registrants definitive Proxy Statement to
be delivered to stockholders in connection with the
Registrants 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are
incorporated by reference into Part III of this
Form 10-K.
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
PART I
This Annual Report on
Form 10-K
contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 that involve
risks, uncertainties and assumptions that, if they never
materialize or if they prove incorrect, could cause our
consolidated results to differ materially from those expressed
or implied by such forward-looking statements. All statements
other than statements of historical fact are statements that
could be deemed forward-looking, including statements pertaining
to: our future revenue, cost of revenue, research and
development expense, selling, general and administrative
expenses, amortization of intangible assets and gross margin,
earnings, cash flows and liquidity; our strategy relating to our
core markets; the potential of future product releases; our
product development plans and investments in research and
development; future acquisitions and anticipated benefits from
acquisitions; international operations and localized versions of
our products; our contractual commitments; our fiscal 2011
revenue and expense expectations and legal proceedings and
litigation matters. You can identify these and other
forward-looking statements by the use of words such as
may, will, should,
expects, plans, anticipates,
believes, estimates,
predicts, intends,
potential, continue or the negative of
such terms, or other comparable terminology. Forward-looking
statements also include the assumptions underlying or relating
to any of the foregoing statements. Our actual results could
differ materially from those anticipated in these
forward-looking statements as a result of various factors,
including those set forth in Item 1A of this Annual Report
under the heading Risk Factors. All forward-looking
statements included in this document are based on information
available to us on the date hereof. We will not undertake and
specifically decline any obligation to update any
forward-looking statements.
Overview
Nuance Communications, Inc. is a leading provider of voice and
language solutions for businesses and consumers around the
world. Our technologies, applications and services make the user
experience more compelling by transforming the way people
interact with devices and systems. Our solutions are used every
day by millions of people and thousands of businesses for tasks
and services such as requesting information from a phone-based
self-service solution, dictating medical records, searching the
mobile Web by voice, entering a destination into a navigation
system, or working with PDF documents. Our solutions help make
these interactions, tasks and experiences more productive,
compelling and efficient.
We leverage our global professional services organization and
our extensive network of partners to design and deploy
innovative solutions for businesses and organizations around the
globe. We market and sell our products directly through a
dedicated sales force and through our
e-commerce
website and also through a global network of resellers,
including system integrators, independent software vendors,
value-added resellers, hardware vendors, telecommunications
carriers and distributors.
We have built a world-class portfolio of intellectual property,
technologies, applications and solutions through both internal
development and acquisitions. We expect to continue to pursue
opportunities to expand our assets, geographic presence,
distribution network and customer base through acquisitions of
other businesses and technologies.
Solutions offered in four core markets; Healthcare, Mobile and
Consumer, Enterprise, and Imaging, include:
Healthcare
The healthcare industry is under significant pressure to
streamline operations, reduce costs and improve patient care. In
recent years, healthcare organizations such as hospitals,
clinics, medical groups, physicians offices and insurance
providers have increasingly turned to speech recognition
solutions to automate manual processes such as the dictation and
transcription of patient records.
We provide comprehensive dictation and transcription solutions
and services that automate the input and management of medical
information. Our hosted and on-premise solutions provide
platforms to generate and distribute clinical documentation
through the use of advanced dictation and transcription
features, and allow us to deliver scalable, highly productive
medical transcription solutions. Our solutions also enable us to
accelerate future
1
innovation to transform the way healthcare providers document
patient care, through improved interface with electronic medical
records and extraction of clinical information to support the
billing and insurance reimbursement processes. We also offer
speech recognition solutions for radiology, cardiology,
pathology and related specialties, that help healthcare
providers dictate, edit and sign reports without manual
transcription.
We utilize a focused, enterprise sales team and professional
services organization to address the market and implementation
requirements of the healthcare industry. Direct distribution is
supplemented by distributors and partnerships with electronic
medical records application providers such as Allscripts, Cerner
and Epic. In some cases, our healthcare solutions are priced
under a traditional software perpetual licensing model. However,
certain of our healthcare solutions, in particular our
transcription solution, are also offered on an on-demand model,
charged as a subscription and priced by volume of usage (such as
number of lines transcribed). During fiscal 2009 and 2010, we
experienced a significant shift in customer preference toward
our subscription pricing model. Representative customers include
Banner Health, Cleveland Clinic, Department of Veterans Affairs,
HCA, Mayo Clinic, Sutter Health, Tenet, and U.S. Army.
Mobile
and Consumer
Today, an increasing number of people worldwide rely on mobile
devices to stay connected, informed and productive. We help
consumers use the powerful capabilities of their phones, cars,
desktop and portable computer, personal navigation devices and
other consumer electronics by enabling the use of voice commands
and enhanced text input solutions to control and interact with
these devices more easily and naturally, and to access the array
of content and services available on the Internet.
Our portfolio of mobile and consumer solutions and services
includes an integrated suite of voice control and
text-to-speech
solutions, dictation applications, predictive text technologies,
mobile messaging services and emerging services such as
dictation, Web search and
voicemail-to-text.
Our suite of Dragon general purpose desktop and portable
computer dictation applications increases productivity by using
speech to create documents, streamline repetitive and complex
tasks, input data, complete forms and automate manual
transcription processes. In particular, we have focused in
recent quarters on integrating our Dragon technology and brand
initiatives across mobile and consumer markets. We utilize a
focused, enterprise sales team and professional services
organization to address market and implementation requirements.
Direct distribution is supplemented by partnerships with
electronics suppliers and integrators such as Harman Kardon and
Clarion. Our solutions are used by mobile phone, automotive,
personal navigation device, computer and other consumer
electronic manufacturers and their suppliers, including Amazon,
Apple, Audi, BMW, Ford, Garmin, HTC, LG Electronics, Mercedes
Benz, Nokia, Samsung,
T-Mobile and
TomTom. In addition, telecommunications carriers, web search
companies and content providers are increasingly using our
mobile search and communication solutions to offer value-added
services to their subscribers and customers. Our embedded mobile
solutions are sold to automobile and device manufacturers,
generally on a royalty model priced per device sold, and
sometimes on a license model. In addition, our connected mobile
services are sold through telecommunications carriers or
directly to consumers, and generally priced on a volume of usage
model (such as per subscriber or per use). Representative
connected services customers include AT&T, Motorola,
Rogers, Telstra, TISA, Vodafone and Vonage.
Our desktop and portable computer dictation software is
currently available in eleven languages. During the fourth
quarter of fiscal 2010, we shipped new versions of Dragon
NaturallySpeaking for Windows and also Dragon Dictate for Mac.
Our desktop and portable computer dictation solutions are
generally sold under a traditional perpetual software license
model. We utilize a combination of our global reseller network
and direct sales to distribute our desktop and portable computer
dictation products. Resellers include retailers such as Amazon,
Best Buy and WalMart. Enterprise customers include organizations
such as law firms, insurance agencies and government agencies.
Representative customers include ATF, Exxon, FBI, IBM, Texas
Dept. of Family Protective Services and Zurich.
Enterprise
To remain competitive, organizations must improve the quality of
customer care while reducing costs and ensuring a positive
customer experience. Technological innovation, competitive
pressures and rapid commoditization have made it increasingly
important for organizations to achieve enduring market
differentiation and secure
2
customer loyalty. In this environment, organizations need to
satisfy the expectations of increasingly savvy and mobile
consumers who demand high levels of customer service.
We deliver a portfolio of customer service business intelligence
and authentication solutions that are designed to help companies
better support, understand and communicate with their customers.
Our solutions include the use of technologies such as speech
recognition, natural language understanding,
text-to-speech,
biometric voice recognition and analytics to automate caller
identification and authorization, call steering, completion of
tasks such as updates, purchases and information retrieval, and
automated outbound notifications. Our solutions improve the
customer experience, increase the use of self-service and enable
new revenue opportunities. We complement our solutions and
products with a global professional services organization that
supports customers and partners with business and systems
consulting project management, user-interface design, voice
science, application development and business performance
optimization, allowing us to deliver
end-to-end
speech solutions and system integration for voice-enabled
customer care. In addition, we offer solutions that can meet
customer care needs through direct interaction with thin-client
applications on cell phones, enabling customers to very quickly
retrieve relevant information. Use of our speech-enabled and
thin-client customer care solutions can dramatically decrease
customer care costs, in comparison to calls handled by operators.
Our solutions are used by a wide variety of enterprises in
customer-service intensive sectors, including
telecommunications, financial services, travel and
entertainment, and government. Our speech solutions are designed
to serve our global partners and customers and are available in
approximately 60 languages and dialects worldwide. In
addition to our own sales and professional services teams, we
often work closely with industry partners, including Avaya,
Cisco and Genesys, that integrate our solutions into their
hardware and software platforms. Our enterprise solutions
offerings include both a traditional software perpetual
licensing model and an on-demand model, charged as a
subscription and priced by volume of usage (such as number of
minutes callers use the system or number of calls completed in
the system). Representative customers include Bank of America,
Cigna, Citibank, Disney, FedEx, United Airlines and Wells Fargo.
Imaging
The proliferation of the Internet, email and other networks have
greatly simplified the ability to share electronic documents,
resulting in an ever-growing volume of documents to be used and
stored. Our PDF and document imaging solutions reduce the costs
associated with paper documents through easy to use scanning,
document management and electronic document routing solutions.
We offer versions of our products to hardware vendors, home
offices, small businesses and enterprise customers.
Our imaging solutions offer comprehensive PDF applications
designed specifically for business users, optical character
recognition technology to deliver highly accurate document and
PDF conversion, and applications that combine PDF creation with
network scanning to quickly enable distribution of documents to
users desktops or to enterprise applications, as well as
software development toolkits for independent software vendors.
Our imaging solutions are generally sold under a traditional
perpetual software license model. We utilize a combination of
our global reseller network and direct sales to distribute our
imaging products. We license our software to original equipment
manufacturers such as Brother, Canon, Dell, HP and Xerox, which
bundle our solutions with multi-function devices, digital
copiers, printers and scanners, on a royalty model, priced per
unit sold.
Research
and Development/Intellectual Property
In recent years, we have developed and acquired extensive
technology assets, intellectual property and industry expertise
in voice, language and imaging that provide us with a
competitive advantage in our markets. Our technologies are based
on complex algorithms which require extensive amounts of
linguistic and image data, acoustic models and recognition
techniques. A significant investment in capital and time would
be necessary to replicate our current capabilities.
We continue to invest in technologies to maintain our
market-leading position and to develop new applications. Our
technologies are covered by approximately 2,100 issued patents
and 1,900 patent applications. Our intellectual property,
whether purchased or developed internally, is critical to our
success and competitive position and, ultimately, to our market
value. We rely on a portfolio of patents, copyrights,
trademarks, services marks, trade
3
secrets, confidentiality provisions and licensing arrangements
to establish and protect our intellectual property and
proprietary rights. We incurred research and development
expenses of $152.1 million, $116.8 million, and
$112.8 million in fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
International
Operations
We have principal offices in a number of international locations
including: Australia, Belgium, Canada, Germany, Hungary, India,
Japan, and the United Kingdom. The responsibilities of our
international operations include research and development,
healthcare transcription and editing, customer support, sales
and marketing and administration. Additionally, we maintain
smaller sales, services and support offices throughout the world
to support our international customers and to expand
international revenue opportunities.
Geographic revenue classification is based on the geographic
areas in which our customers are located. For fiscal 2010, 2009
and 2008, 72%, 74% and 77% of revenue was generated in the
United States and 28%, 26% and 23% of revenue was generated by
our international operations, respectively.
Competition
The individual markets in which we compete are highly
competitive and are subject to rapid technology changes. There
are a number of companies that develop or may develop products
that compete in our target markets; however, currently there is
no one company that competes with us in all of our product
areas. While we expect competition to continue to increase both
from existing competitors and new market entrants, we believe
that we will compete effectively based on many factors,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
Technological Superiority. Our voice, language
and imaging technologies, applications and solutions are often
recognized as the most innovative and proficient products in
their respective categories. Our voice and language technology
has industry-leading recognition accuracy and provides a
natural, voice-enabled interaction with systems, devices and
applications. Our imaging technology is viewed as the most
accurate in the industry. Technology publications, analyst
research and independent benchmarks have consistently indicated
that our products rank at or above performance levels of
alternative solutions.
|
|
|
|
Broad Distribution Channels. Our ability to
address the needs of specific markets, such as financial, legal,
healthcare and government, and to introduce new products and
solutions quickly and effectively is enhanced through our
dedicated direct sales force; our extensive global network of
resellers, comprising system integrators, independent software
vendors, value-added resellers, hardware vendors,
telecommunications carriers and distributors; and our
e-commerce
website (www.nuance.com).
|
|
|
|
International Appeal. The international reach
of our products is due to the broad language coverage of our
offerings, including our voice and language technology, which
provides recognition for approximately 60 languages and
dialects and natural-sounding synthesized speech in
39 languages, and supports a broad range of hardware
platforms and operating systems. Our imaging technology supports
more than 100 languages.
|
|
|
|
Specialized Professional Services. Our
superior technology, when coupled with the high quality and
domain knowledge of our professional services organization,
allows our customers and partners to place a high degree of
confidence and trust in our ability to deliver results. We
support our customers in designing and building powerful,
innovative applications that specifically address their needs
and requirements.
|
In our core markets, we compete with companies such as Adobe,
Medquist, Microsoft, Google and Transcend Services. In addition,
a number of smaller companies in both speech and imaging produce
technologies or products that are competitive with our solutions
in some markets. In certain markets, some of our partners such
as Avaya, Cisco, Genesys and Nortel develop and market products
and services that might be considered substitutes for our
solutions. Current and potential competitors have established,
or may establish, cooperative relationships among themselves or
with third parties to increase the ability of their technologies
to address the needs of our prospective customers.
Some of our competitors or potential competitors, such as Adobe,
Microsoft and Google, have significantly greater financial,
technical and marketing resources than we do. These competitors
may be able to respond more
4
rapidly than we can to new or emerging technologies or changes
in customer requirements. They may also devote greater resources
to the development, promotion and sale of their products than we
do.
Employees
As of September 30, 2010, we had approximately
6,100 full-time employees in total, including approximately
750 in sales and marketing, approximately 1,450 in professional
services, approximately 950 in research and development,
approximately 550 in general and administrative and
approximately 2,400 that provide transcription and editing
services. Approximately 44 percent of our employees are
based outside of the United States, the majority of whom provide
transcription and editing services and are based in India. Our
employees are not represented by any labor union and are not
organized under a collective bargaining agreement, and we have
never experienced a work stoppage. We believe that our
relationships with our employees are generally good.
Company
Information
We were incorporated in 1992 as Visioneer, Inc. under the laws
of the state of Delaware. In 1999, we changed our name to
ScanSoft, Inc. and also changed our ticker symbol to SSFT. In
October 2005, we changed our name to Nuance Communications, Inc.
and in November 2005 we changed our ticker symbol to NUAN.
Our website is located at www.nuance.com. This Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
our Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q,
our Current Reports on
Form 8-K,
and all amendments to these reports, as well as proxy statements
and other information we file with or furnish to the Securities
and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, are accessible free of
charge on our website. We make these documents available as soon
as reasonably practicable after we file them with, or furnish
them to, the SEC. Our SEC filings are also available on the
SECs website at
http://www.sec.gov.
Alternatively, you may access any document we have filed by
visiting the SECs Public Reference Room at
100 F Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549.
Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room can be
obtained by calling the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330.
Except as otherwise stated in these documents, the information
contained on our website or available by hyperlink from our
website is not incorporated by reference into this report or any
other documents we file with or furnish to the SEC.
You should carefully consider the risks described below when
evaluating our company and when deciding whether to invest in
our company. The risks and uncertainties described below are not
the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not
presently known to us or that we do not currently believe are
important to an investor may also harm our business operations.
If any of the events, contingencies, circumstances or conditions
described in the following risks actually occurs, our business,
financial condition or our results of operations could be
seriously harmed. If that happens, the trading price of our
common stock could decline and you may lose part or all of the
value of any of our shares held by you.
Risks
Related to Our Business
Our
operating results may fluctuate significantly from period to
period, and this may cause our stock price to
decline.
Our revenue and operating results have fluctuated in the past
and are expected to continue to fluctuate in the future. Given
this fluctuation, we believe that quarter to quarter comparisons
of revenue and operating results are not necessarily meaningful
or an accurate indicator of our future performance. As a result,
our results of operations may not meet the expectations of
securities analysts or investors in the future. If this occurs,
the price of our stock would likely decline. Factors that
contribute to fluctuations in operating results include the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
slowing sales by our distribution and fulfillment partners to
their customers, which may place pressure on these partners to
reduce purchases of our products;
|
|
|
|
volume, timing and fulfillment of customer orders;
|
|
|
|
our efforts to generate additional revenue from our intellectual
property portfolio;
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
concentration of operations with one manufacturing partner and
our inability to control expenses related to the manufacturing,
packaging and shipping of our boxed software products;
|
|
|
|
customers delaying their purchasing decisions in anticipation of
new versions of our products;
|
|
|
|
customers delaying, canceling or limiting their purchases as a
result of the threat or results of terrorism;
|
|
|
|
introduction of new products by us or our competitors;
|
|
|
|
seasonality in purchasing patterns of our customers;
|
|
|
|
reduction in the prices of our products in response to
competition, market conditions or contractual obligations;
|
|
|
|
returns and allowance charges in excess of accrued amounts;
|
|
|
|
timing of significant marketing and sales promotions;
|
|
|
|
impairment charges against goodwill and intangible assets;
|
|
|
|
delayed realization of synergies resulting from our acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
write-offs of excess or obsolete inventory and accounts
receivable that are not collectible;
|
|
|
|
increased expenditures incurred pursuing new product or market
opportunities;
|
|
|
|
general economic trends as they affect retail and corporate
sales; and
|
|
|
|
higher than anticipated costs related to fixed-price contracts
with our customers.
|
Due to the foregoing factors, among others, our revenue and
operating results are difficult to forecast. Our expense levels
are based in significant part on our expectations of future
revenue and we may not be able to reduce our expenses quickly to
respond to a shortfall in projected revenue. Therefore, our
failure to meet revenue expectations would seriously harm our
operating results, financial condition and cash flows.
We
have grown, and may continue to grow, through acquisitions,
which could dilute our existing stockholders.
As part of our business strategy, we have in the past acquired,
and expect to continue to acquire, other businesses and
technologies. In connection with past acquisitions, we issued a
substantial number of shares of our common stock as transaction
consideration and also incurred significant debt to finance the
cash consideration used for our acquisitions. We may continue to
issue equity securities for future acquisitions, which would
dilute existing stockholders, perhaps significantly depending on
the terms of such acquisitions. We may also incur additional
debt in connection with future acquisitions, which, if available
at all, may place additional restrictions on our ability to
operate our business.
Our
ability to realize the anticipated benefits of our acquisitions
will depend on successfully integrating the acquired
businesses.
Our prior acquisitions required, and our recently completed
acquisitions continue to require, substantial integration and
management efforts and we expect future acquisitions to require
similar efforts. Acquisitions of this nature involve a number of
risks, including:
|
|
|
|
|
difficulty in transitioning and integrating the operations and
personnel of the acquired businesses;
|
|
|
|
potential disruption of our ongoing business and distraction of
management;
|
|
|
|
potential difficulty in successfully implementing, upgrading and
deploying in a timely and effective manner new operational
information systems and upgrades of our finance, accounting and
product distribution systems;
|
|
|
|
difficulty in incorporating acquired technology and rights into
our products and technology;
|
|
|
|
potential difficulties in completing projects associated with
in-process research and development;
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
unanticipated expenses and delays in completing acquired
development projects and technology integration;
|
|
|
|
management of geographically remote business units both in the
United States and internationally;
|
|
|
|
impairment of relationships with partners and customers;
|
|
|
|
assumption of unknown material liabilities of acquired companies;
|
|
|
|
accurate projection of revenue plans of the acquired entity in
the due diligence process;
|
|
|
|
customers delaying purchases of our products pending resolution
of product integration between our existing and our newly
acquired products;
|
|
|
|
entering markets or types of businesses in which we have limited
experience; and
|
|
|
|
potential loss of key employees of the acquired business.
|
As a result of these and other risks, if we are unable to
successfully integrate acquired businesses, we may not realize
the anticipated benefits from our acquisitions. Any failure to
achieve these benefits or failure to successfully integrate
acquired businesses and technologies could seriously harm our
business.
Accounting
treatment of our acquisitions could decrease our net income or
expected revenue in the foreseeable future, which could have a
material and adverse effect on the market value of our common
stock.
Under accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America, we record the market value of our common
stock or other form of consideration issued in connection with
the acquisition and, for transactions which closed prior to
October 1, 2009, the amount of direct transaction costs as
the cost of acquiring the company or business. We have allocated
that cost to the individual assets acquired and liabilities
assumed, including various identifiable intangible assets such
as acquired technology, acquired tradenames and acquired
customer relationships based on their respective fair values.
Intangible assets are generally amortized over a five to ten
year period. Goodwill and certain intangible assets with
indefinite lives, are not subject to amortization but are
subject to an impairment analysis, at least annually, which may
result in an impairment charge if the carrying value exceeds its
implied fair value. As of September 30, 2010, we had
identified intangible assets of approximately
$685.9 million, net of accumulated amortization, and
goodwill of approximately $2.1 billion. In addition,
purchase accounting limits our ability to recognize certain
revenue that otherwise would have been recognized by the
acquired company as an independent business. As a result, the
combined company may delay revenue recognition or recognize less
revenue than we and the acquired company would have recognized
as independent companies.
Changes
in the accounting method for business combinations may have an
adverse impact on our reported or future financial
results.
For the years ended September 30, 2009 and prior, in
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard
(SFAS) 141 Business Combinations,
(SFAS 141), all direct acquisition-related
costs, such as investment bankers, attorneys and
accountants fees, as well as contingent consideration to
the seller, which was recorded when it was beyond a reasonable
doubt that the amount was payable, were capitalized as part of
the purchase price.
In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007),
Business Combinations, now referred to as
FASB Accounting Standards Codification 805 (ASC
805), which requires an acquirer to do the following:
expense acquisition-related costs as incurred; reflect such
payments as a reduction of cash flow from operations; record
contingent consideration at fair value at the acquisition date
with subsequent changes in fair value to be recognized in the
income statement and cash flow from operations. ASC 805
7
applies to business combinations for which the acquisition date
is on or after October 1, 2009 and could have a material
impact on our results of operations and our financial position
due to our acquisition strategy.
Our
significant debt could adversely affect our financial health and
prevent us from fulfilling our obligations under our credit
facility and our convertible debentures.
We have a significant amount of debt. As of September 30,
2010, we had a total of $895.1 million of gross debt
outstanding, including $643.6 million in term loans due in
March 2013 and $250.0 million in convertible debentures
which investors may require us to redeem in August 2014. We also
have a $75.0 million revolving credit line available to us
through March 2012. As of September 30, 2010, there were
$21.2 million of letters of credit issued under the
revolving credit line but there were no other outstanding
borrowings under the revolving credit line. Our debt level could
have important consequences, for example it could:
|
|
|
|
|
require us to use a large portion of our cash flow to pay
principal and interest on debt, including the convertible
debentures and the credit facility, which will reduce the
availability of our cash flow to fund working capital, capital
expenditures, acquisitions, research and development
expenditures and other business activities;
|
|
|
|
restrict us from making strategic acquisitions or exploiting
business opportunities;
|
|
|
|
place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our
competitors that have less debt; and
|
|
|
|
limit, along with the financial and other restrictive covenants
related to our debt, our ability to borrow additional funds,
dispose of assets or pay cash dividends.
|
Our ability to meet our payment and other obligations under our
debt instruments depends on our ability to generate significant
cash flow in the future. This, to some extent, is subject to
general economic, financial, competitive, legislative and
regulatory factors as well as other factors that are beyond our
control. We cannot assure you that our business will generate
cash flow from operations, or that additional capital will be
available to us, in an amount sufficient to enable us to meet
our payment obligations under the convertible debentures and our
other debt and to fund other liquidity needs. If we are not able
to generate sufficient cash flow to service our debt
obligations, we may need to refinance or restructure our debt,
including the convertible debentures, sell assets, reduce or
delay capital investments, or seek to raise additional capital.
If we are unable to implement one or more of these alternatives,
we may not be able to meet our payment obligations under the
convertible debentures and our other debt.
In addition, a substantial portion of our debt bears interest at
variable rates. If market interest rates increase, our debt
service requirements will increase, which would adversely affect
our cash flows. While we have entered into interest rate swap
agreements limiting our exposure for a portion of our debt, the
agreements do not offer complete protection from this risk.
Our
debt agreements contain covenant restrictions that may limit our
ability to operate our business.
The agreement governing our senior credit facility contains, and
any of our other future debt agreements may contain, covenant
restrictions that limit our ability to operate our business,
including restrictions on our ability to:
|
|
|
|
|
incur additional debt or issue guarantees;
|
|
|
|
create liens;
|
|
|
|
make certain investments;
|
|
|
|
enter into transactions with our affiliates;
|
|
|
|
sell certain assets;
|
|
|
|
redeem capital stock or make other restricted payments;
|
|
|
|
declare or pay dividends or make other distributions to
stockholders; and
|
|
|
|
merge or consolidate with any entity.
|
8
Our ability to comply with these covenants is dependent on our
future performance, which will be subject to many factors, some
of which are beyond our control, including prevailing economic
conditions. As a result of these covenants, our ability to
respond to changes in business and economic conditions and to
obtain additional financing, if needed, may be significantly
restricted, and we may be prevented from engaging in
transactions that might otherwise be beneficial to us. In
addition, our failure to comply with these covenants could
result in a default under our debt agreements, which could
permit the holders to accelerate our obligation to repay the
debt. If any of our debt is accelerated, we may not have
sufficient funds available to repay the accelerated debt.
We
have a history of operating losses, and may incur losses in the
future, which may require us to raise additional capital on
unfavorable terms.
We reported net losses of $19.1 million, $19.4 million
and $37.0 million for the fiscal years 2010, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. If we are unable to achieve and maintain
profitability, the market price for our stock may decline,
perhaps substantially. We cannot assure you that our revenue
will grow or that we will achieve or maintain profitability in
the future. If we do not achieve and maintain profitability, we
may be required to raise additional capital to maintain or grow
our operations. Additional capital, if available at all, may be
highly dilutive to existing investors or contain other
unfavorable terms, such as a high interest rate and restrictive
covenants.
Voice
and language technologies may not achieve widespread acceptance,
which could limit our ability to grow our voice and language
business.
We have invested and expect to continue to invest heavily in the
acquisition, development and marketing of voice and language
technologies. The market for voice and language technologies is
relatively new and rapidly evolving. Our ability to increase
revenue in the future depends in large measure on the acceptance
of these technologies in general and our products in particular.
The continued development of the market for our current and
future voice and language solutions will also depend on:
|
|
|
|
|
consumer and business demand for speech-enabled applications;
|
|
|
|
development by third-party vendors of applications using voice
and language technologies; and
|
|
|
|
continuous improvement in voice and language technology.
|
Sales of our voice and language products would be harmed if the
market for these technologies does not continue to develop or
develops slower than we expect, and, consequently, our business
could be harmed and we may not recover the costs associated with
our investment in these technologies.
The
markets in which we operate are highly competitive and rapidly
changing and we may be unable to compete
successfully.
There are a number of companies that develop or may develop
products that compete in our targeted markets. The individual
markets in which we compete are highly competitive, and are
rapidly changing. Within voice and language, we compete with
AT&T, Microsoft, Google, and other smaller providers.
Within healthcare, we compete with Medquist and other smaller
providers. Within imaging, we compete with ABBYY, Adobe,
I.R.I.S. and NewSoft. In voice and language, some of our
partners such as Avaya, Cisco, Edify, Genesys and Nortel develop
and market products that can be considered substitutes for our
solutions. In addition, a number of smaller companies in voice,
language and imaging produce technologies or products that are
in some markets competitive with our solutions. Current and
potential competitors have established, or may establish,
cooperative relationships among themselves or with third parties
to increase the ability of their technologies to address the
needs of our prospective customers.
The competition in these markets could adversely affect our
operating results by reducing the volume of the products we
license or the prices we can charge. Some of our current or
potential competitors, such as Adobe, Microsoft and Google, have
significantly greater financial, technical and marketing
resources than we do. These competitors may be able to respond
more rapidly than we can to new or emerging technologies or
changes in customer requirements. They may also devote greater
resources to the development, promotion and sale of their
products than we do.
9
Some of our customers, such as Microsoft and Google, have
developed or acquired products or technologies that compete with
our products and technologies. These customers may give higher
priority to the sale of these competitive products or
technologies. To the extent they do so, market acceptance and
penetration of our products, and therefore our revenue, may be
adversely affected. Our success will depend substantially upon
our ability to enhance our products and technologies and to
develop and introduce, on a timely and cost-effective basis, new
products and features that meet changing customer requirements
and incorporate technological enhancements. If we are unable to
develop new products and enhance functionalities or technologies
to adapt to these changes, or if we are unable to realize
synergies among our acquired products and technologies, our
business will suffer.
The
failure to successfully maintain the adequacy of our system of
internal control over financial reporting could have a material
adverse impact on our ability to report our financial results in
an accurate and timely manner.
The SEC, as directed by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, adopted rules requiring public companies to include
a report of management on internal control over financial
reporting in their annual reports on
Form 10-K
that contains an assessment by management of the effectiveness
of our internal control over financial reporting. In addition,
our independent registered public accounting firm must attest to
and report on the effectiveness of our internal control over
financial reporting. Any failure in the effectiveness of our
system of internal control over financial reporting could have a
material adverse impact on our ability to report our financial
statements in an accurate and timely manner, could subject us to
regulatory actions, civil or criminal penalties, shareholder
litigation, or loss of customer confidence, which could result
in an adverse reaction in the financial marketplace due to a
loss of investor confidence in the reliability of our financial
statements, which ultimately could negatively impact our stock
price.
A
significant portion of our revenue is derived, and a significant
portion of our research and development activities are based,
outside the United States. Our results could be harmed by
economic, political, regulatory and other risks associated with
these international regions.
Because we operate worldwide, our business is subject to risks
associated with doing business internationally. We anticipate
that revenue from international operations could increase in the
future. Most of our international revenue is generated by sales
in Europe and Asia. In addition, some of our products are
developed and manufactured outside the United States and we have
a large number of employees in India that provide transcription
services. A significant portion of the development and
manufacturing of our voice and language products is conducted in
Belgium and Canada, and a significant portion of our imaging
research and development is conducted in Hungary. We also have
significant research and development resources in Aachen,
Germany, and Vienna, Austria. Accordingly, our future results
could be harmed by a variety of factors associated with
international sales and operations, including:
|
|
|
|
|
changes in a specific countrys or regions economic
conditions;
|
|
|
|
geopolitical turmoil, including terrorism and war;
|
|
|
|
trade protection measures and import or export licensing
requirements imposed by the United States or by other countries;
|
|
|
|
compliance with foreign and domestic laws and regulations;
|
|
|
|
negative consequences from changes in applicable tax laws;
|
|
|
|
difficulties in staffing and managing operations in multiple
locations in many countries;
|
|
|
|
difficulties in collecting trade accounts receivable in other
countries; and
|
|
|
|
less effective protection of intellectual property than in the
United States.
|
We are
exposed to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange
rates.
Because we have international subsidiaries and distributors that
operate and sell our products outside the United States, we are
exposed to the risk of changes in foreign currency exchange
rates. In certain circumstances,
10
we have entered into forward exchange contracts to hedge against
foreign currency fluctuations. We use these contracts to reduce
our risk associated with exchange rate movements, as the gains
or losses on these contracts are intended to offset any exchange
rate losses or gains on the hedged transaction. We do not engage
in foreign currency speculation. Forward exchange contracts
hedging firm commitments qualify for hedge accounting when they
are designated as a hedge of the foreign currency exposure and
they are effective in minimizing such exposure. With our
increased international presence in a number of geographic
locations and with international revenue and costs projected to
increase, we are exposed to changes in foreign currencies
including the Euro, British Pound, Canadian Dollar, Japanese
Yen, Indian Rupee and the Hungarian Forint. Changes in the value
of the Euro or other foreign currencies relative to the value of
the U.S. dollar could adversely affect future revenue and
operating results.
Impairment
of our intangible assets could result in significant charges
that would adversely impact our future operating
results.
We have significant intangible assets, including goodwill and
intangibles with indefinite lives, which are susceptible to
valuation adjustments as a result of changes in various factors
or conditions. The most significant intangible assets are
patents and core technology, completed technology, customer
relationships and trademarks. Customer relationships are
amortized on an accelerated basis based upon the pattern in
which the economic benefits of customer relationships are being
utilized. Other identifiable intangible assets are amortized on
a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives. We
assess the potential impairment of identifiable intangible
assets on an annual basis, as well as whenever events or changes
in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be
recoverable. Factors that could trigger an impairment of such
assets, include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
significant underperformance relative to historical or projected
future operating results;
|
|
|
|
significant changes in the manner of or use of the acquired
assets or the strategy for our overall business;
|
|
|
|
significant negative industry or economic trends;
|
|
|
|
significant decline in our stock price for a sustained period;
|
|
|
|
changes in our organization or management reporting structure
that could result in additional reporting units, which may
require alternative methods of estimating fair values or greater
disaggregation or aggregation in our analysis by reporting
unit; and
|
|
|
|
a decline in our market capitalization below net book value.
|
Future adverse changes in these or other unforeseeable factors
could result in an impairment charge that would impact our
results of operations and financial position in the reporting
period identified.
Our
sales to government clients subject us to risks, including early
termination, audits, investigations, sanctions and
penalties.
We derive a portion of our revenues from contracts with the
United States government, as well as various state and local
governments, and their respective agencies. Government contracts
are generally subject to audits and investigations which could
identify violations of these agreements. Government contract
violations could result in a range of consequences including,
but not limited to, contract price adjustments, civil and
criminal penalties, contract termination, forfeiture of profit
and/or
suspension of payment, and suspension or debarment from future
government contracts. We could also suffer serious harm to our
reputation if we were found to have violated the terms of our
government contracts.
We conducted an analysis of our compliance with the terms and
conditions of certain contracts with the U.S. General
Services Administration (GSA). Based upon our
analysis, we voluntarily notified GSA of non-compliance with the
terms of two contracts. The final resolution of this matter may
adversely impact our financial position.
11
If we
are unable to attract and retain key personnel, our business
could be harmed.
If any of our key employees were to leave, we could face
substantial difficulty in hiring qualified successors and could
experience a loss in productivity while any successor obtains
the necessary training and experience. Our employment
relationships are generally at-will and we have had key
employees leave in the past. We cannot assure you that one or
more key employees will not leave in the future. We intend to
continue to hire additional highly qualified personnel,
including software engineers and operational personnel, but may
not be able to attract, assimilate or retain qualified personnel
in the future. Any failure to attract, integrate, motivate and
retain these employees could harm our business.
Our
medical transcription services may be subject to legal claims
for failure to comply with laws governing the confidentiality of
medical records.
Healthcare professionals who use our medical transcription
services deliver to us health information about their patients
including information that constitutes a record under applicable
law that we may store on our computer systems. Numerous federal
and state laws and regulations, the common law and contractual
obligations govern collection, dissemination, use and
confidentiality of patient-identifiable health information,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
state and federal privacy and confidentiality laws;
|
|
|
|
our contracts with customers and partners;
|
|
|
|
state laws regulating healthcare professionals;
|
|
|
|
Medicaid laws; and
|
|
|
|
the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996
and related rules proposed by the Health Care Financing
Administration.
|
The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996
establishes elements including, but not limited to, federal
privacy and security standards for the use and protection of
protected health information. Any failure by us or by our
personnel or partners to comply with applicable requirements may
result in a material liability. Although we have systems and
policies in place for safeguarding protected health information
from unauthorized disclosure, these systems and policies may not
preclude claims against us for alleged violations of applicable
requirements. There can be no assurance that we will not be
subject to liability claims that could have a material adverse
affect on our business, results of operations and financial
condition.
Adverse
changes in general economic or political conditions in any of
the major countries in which we do business could adversely
affect our operating results.
As our business has grown, we have become increasingly subject
to the risks arising from adverse changes in domestic and global
economic and political conditions. For example, the direction
and relative strength of the U.S. and global economies have
recently been increasingly uncertain due to softness in housing
markets, extreme volatility in security prices, severely
diminished liquidity and credit availability, rating downgrades
of certain investments and declining valuations of others and
continuing geopolitical uncertainties. If economic growth in the
United States and other countries in which we do business is
slowed, customers may delay or reduce technology purchases and
may be unable to obtain credit to finance the purchase of our
products. This could result in reduced sales of our products,
longer sales cycles, slower adoption of new technologies and
increased price competition. Any of these events would likely
harm our business, results of operations and financial
condition. Political instability in any of the major countries
in which we do business would also likely harm our business,
results of operations and financial condition.
Current
uncertainty in the global financial markets and the global
economy may negatively affect our financial
results.
Current uncertainty in the global financial markets and economy
may negatively affect our financial results. These macroeconomic
developments could negatively affect our business, operating
results or financial condition in a number of ways which, in
turn, could adversely affect our stock price. A prolonged period
of economic decline
12
could have a material adverse effect on our results of
operations and financial condition and exacerbate some of the
other risk factors described herein. Our customers may defer
purchases of our products, licenses, and services in response to
tighter credit and negative financial news or reduce their
demand for them. Our customers may also not be able to obtain
adequate access to credit, which could affect their ability to
make timely payments to us or ultimately cause the customer to
file for protection from creditors under applicable insolvency
or bankruptcy laws. If our customers are not able to make timely
payments to us, our accounts receivable could increase.
Our investment portfolio, which includes short-term debt
securities, is generally subject to credit, liquidity,
counterparty, market and interest rate risks that may be
exacerbated by the recent global financial crisis. If the
banking system or the fixed income, credit or equity markets
deteriorate or remain volatile, our investment portfolio may be
impacted and the values and liquidity of our investments could
be adversely affected.
In addition, our operating results and financial condition could
be negatively affected if, as a result of economic conditions,
either:
|
|
|
|
|
the demand for, and prices of, our products, licenses, or
services are reduced as a result of actions by our competitors
or otherwise; or
|
|
|
|
our financial counterparties or other contractual counterparties
are unable to, or do not, meet their contractual commitments to
us.
|
Security
and privacy breaches in our systems may damage client relations
and inhibit our growth.
The uninterrupted operation of our hosted solutions and the
confidentiality and security of third-party information is
critical to our business. Any failures in our security and
privacy measures could have a material adverse effect on our
financial position and results of operations. If we are unable
to protect, or our clients perceive that we are unable to
protect, the security and privacy of our electronic information,
our growth could be materially adversely affected. A security or
privacy breach may:
|
|
|
|
|
cause our clients to lose confidence in our solutions;
|
|
|
|
harm our reputation;
|
|
|
|
expose us to liability; and
|
|
|
|
increase our expenses from potential remediation costs.
|
While we believe we use proven applications designed for data
security and integrity to process electronic transactions, there
can be no assurance that our use of these applications will be
sufficient to address changing market conditions or the security
and privacy concerns of existing and potential clients.
Risks
Related to Our Intellectual Property and Technology
Unauthorized
use of our proprietary technology and intellectual property
could adversely affect our business and results of
operations.
Our success and competitive position depend in large part on our
ability to obtain and maintain intellectual property rights
protecting our products and services. We rely on a combination
of patents, copyrights, trademarks, service marks, trade
secrets, confidentiality provisions and licensing arrangements
to establish and protect our intellectual property and
proprietary rights. Unauthorized parties may attempt to copy
aspects of our products or to obtain, license, sell or otherwise
use information that we regard as proprietary. Policing
unauthorized use of our products is difficult and we may not be
able to protect our technology from unauthorized use.
Additionally, our competitors may independently develop
technologies that are substantially the same or superior to our
technologies and that do not infringe our rights. In these
cases, we would be unable to prevent our competitors from
selling or licensing these similar or superior technologies. In
addition, the laws of some foreign countries do not protect our
proprietary rights to the same extent as the laws of the United
States. Although the source code for our proprietary software is
protected both as a trade secret and as a copyrighted work,
litigation may be necessary to enforce our intellectual property
rights, to protect our trade secrets, to determine the validity
and scope of the proprietary rights
13
of others, or to defend against claims of infringement or
invalidity. Litigation, regardless of the outcome, can be very
expensive and can divert management efforts.
Third
parties have claimed and may claim in the future that we are
infringing their intellectual property, and we could be exposed
to significant litigation or licensing expenses or be prevented
from selling our products if such claims are
successful.
From time to time, we are subject to claims that we or our
customers may be infringing or contributing to the infringement
of the intellectual property rights of others. We may be unaware
of intellectual property rights of others that may cover some of
our technologies and products. If it appears necessary or
desirable, we may seek licenses for these intellectual property
rights. However, we may not be able to obtain licenses from some
or all claimants, the terms of any offered licenses may not be
acceptable to us, and we may not be able to resolve disputes
without litigation. Any litigation regarding intellectual
property could be costly and time-consuming and could divert the
attention of our management and key personnel from our business
operations. In the event of a claim of intellectual property
infringement, we may be required to enter into costly royalty or
license agreements. Third parties claiming intellectual property
infringement may be able to obtain injunctive or other equitable
relief that could effectively block our ability to develop and
sell our products.
We may
incur substantial costs enforcing or acquiring intellectual
property rights and defending against third-party claims as a
result of litigation or other proceedings.
In connection with the enforcement of our own intellectual
property rights, the acquisition of third-party intellectual
property rights, or disputes relating to the validity or alleged
infringement of third-party intellectual property rights,
including patent rights, we have been, are currently, and may in
the future be, subject to claims, negotiations or complex,
protracted litigation. Intellectual property disputes and
litigation are typically very costly and can be disruptive to
our business operations by diverting the attention and energy of
management and key technical personnel. Although we have
successfully defended or resolved past litigation and disputes,
we may not prevail in any ongoing or future litigation and
disputes. In addition, we may incur significant costs in
acquiring the necessary third party intellectual property rights
for use in our products. Third party intellectual property
disputes could subject us to significant liabilities, require us
to enter into royalty and licensing arrangements on unfavorable
terms, prevent us from manufacturing or licensing certain of our
products, cause severe disruptions to our operations or the
markets in which we compete, or require us to satisfy
indemnification commitments with our customers including
contractual provisions under various license arrangements. Any
of these could seriously harm our business.
Our
software products may have bugs, which could result in delayed
or lost revenue, expensive correction, liability to our
customers and claims against us.
Complex software products such as ours may contain errors,
defects or bugs. Defects in the solutions or products that we
develop and sell to our customers could require expensive
corrections and result in delayed or lost revenue, adverse
customer reaction and negative publicity about us or our
products and services. Customers who are not satisfied with any
of our products may also bring claims against us for damages,
which, even if unsuccessful, would likely be time-consuming to
defend, and could result in costly litigation and payment of
damages. Such claims could harm our reputation, financial
results and competitive position.
Risks
Related to our Corporate Structure, Organization and Common
Stock
The
holdings of our largest stockholder may enable it to influence
matters requiring stockholder approval.
As of September 30, 2010, Warburg Pincus, a global private
equity firm, beneficially owned approximately 24% of our
outstanding common stock, including warrants exercisable for up
to 7,562,422 shares of our common stock, and
3,562,238 shares of our outstanding Series B Preferred
Stock, each of which is convertible into one share of our common
stock. Because of its large holdings of our capital stock
relative to other stockholders, this stockholder has a strong
influence over matters requiring approval by our stockholders.
14
The
market price of our common stock has been and may continue to be
subject to wide fluctuations, and this may make it difficult for
you to resell the common stock when you want or at prices you
find attractive.
Our stock price historically has been, and may continue to be,
volatile. Various factors contribute to the volatility of our
stock price, including, for example, quarterly variations in our
financial results, new product introductions by us or our
competitors and general economic and market conditions. Sales of
a substantial number of shares of our common stock by our
largest stockholders, or the perception that such sales could
occur, could also contribute to the volatility or our stock
price. While we cannot predict the individual effect that these
factors may have on the market price of our common stock, these
factors, either individually or in the aggregate, could result
in significant volatility in our stock price during any given
period of time. Moreover, companies that have experienced
volatility in the market price of their stock often are subject
to securities class action litigation. If we were the subject of
such litigation, it could result in substantial costs and divert
managements attention and resources.
Compliance
with changing regulation of corporate governance and public
disclosure may result in additional expenses.
Changing laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate
governance and public disclosure, including the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, new regulations promulgated by the Securities and
Exchange Commission and the rules of The Nasdaq Global Select
Market, are resulting in increased general and administrative
expenses for companies such as ours. These new or changed laws,
regulations and standards are subject to varying interpretations
in many cases, and as a result, their application in practice
may evolve over time as new guidance is provided by regulatory
and governing bodies, which could result in higher costs
necessitated by ongoing revisions to disclosure and governance
practices. We are committed to maintaining high standards of
corporate governance and public disclosure. As a result, we
intend to invest resources to comply with evolving laws,
regulations and standards, and this investment may result in
increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion of
management time and attention from revenue-generating activities
to compliance activities. If our efforts to comply with new or
changed laws, regulations and standards differ from the
activities intended by regulatory or governing bodies, our
business may be harmed.
Future
sales of our common stock in the public market could adversely
affect the trading price of our common stock and our ability to
raise funds in new stock offerings.
Future sales of substantial amounts of our common stock in the
public market, or the perception that such sales could occur,
could adversely affect prevailing trading prices of our common
stock and could impair our ability to raise capital through
future offerings of equity or equity-related securities. In
connection with past acquisitions, we issued a substantial
number of shares of our common stock as transaction
consideration. We may continue to issue equity securities for
future acquisitions, which would dilute existing stockholders,
perhaps significantly depending on the terms of such
acquisitions. For example, we issued, and registered for resale,
approximately 2.3 million shares of our common stock in
connection with our December 2009 acquisition of SpinVox. No
prediction can be made as to the effect, if any, that future
sales of shares of common stock, or the availability of shares
of common stock for future sale, will have on the trading price
of our common stock.
We
have implemented anti-takeover provisions, which could
discourage or prevent a takeover, even if an acquisition would
be beneficial to our stockholders.
Provisions of our certificate of incorporation, bylaws and
Delaware law, as well as other organizational documents could
make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us, even if
doing so would be beneficial to our stockholders. These
provisions include:
|
|
|
|
|
authorized blank check preferred stock;
|
|
|
|
prohibiting cumulative voting in the election of directors;
|
|
|
|
limiting the ability of stockholders to call special meetings of
stockholders;
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
requiring all stockholder actions to be taken at meetings of our
stockholders; and
|
|
|
|
establishing advance notice requirements for nominations of
directors and for stockholder proposals.
|
|
|
Item 1B.
|
Unresolved
Staff Comments
|
None.
16
Our corporate headquarters and administrative, sales, marketing,
research and development and customer support functions occupy
approximately 201,000 square feet of space that we lease in
Burlington, Massachusetts. We also lease additional properties
in the United States and a number of foreign countries. The
following table summarizes our significant properties as of
September 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location
|
|
Sq. Ft.
|
|
|
Lease Term
|
|
Primary Use
|
|
|
(approx.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Burlington, Massachusetts
|
|
|
201,000
|
|
|
March 2018
|
|
Corporate headquarters and administrative, sales, marketing,
research and development and customer support functions.
|
Redwood City, California(1)
|
|
|
141,000
|
|
|
July 2012
|
|
Twelve percent of this facility is unoccupied, the remainder has
been sublet to third party tenants.
|
Melbourne, Florida
|
|
|
130,000
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
Administrative, sales, marketing, customer support and order
fulfillment functions.
|
Montreal, Quebec
|
|
|
74,000
|
|
|
December 2016
|
|
Administrative, sales, marketing, research and development,
professional services, customer support functions.
|
Sunnyvale, California
|
|
|
71,000
|
|
|
September 2013
|
|
Administrative, research and development, sales, marketing and
customer support functions.
|
Seattle Washington
|
|
|
46,000
|
|
|
January 2021
|
|
Administrative, research and development, sales, marketing and
customer support functions.
|
Mahwah, New Jersey
|
|
|
38,000
|
|
|
June 2015
|
|
Professional services and sales functions.
|
New York, New York(2)
|
|
|
34,000
|
|
|
February 2016
|
|
Subleased to third-party tenants.
|
Merelbeke, Belgium
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
March 2017
|
|
Administrative, sales, marketing, research and development and
customer support functions.
|
Budapest, Hungary
|
|
|
21,000
|
|
|
December 2012
|
|
Administrative and research and development.
|
Aachen, Germany
|
|
|
22,000
|
|
|
March 2016
|
|
Research and development and sales functions.
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The lease for this property was assumed as part of our
acquisition in September 2005 of Nuance Communications, Inc,
which we refer to as Former Nuance. |
|
(2) |
|
The lease for this property was assumed as part of our
acquisition of SpeechWorks. |
In addition to the properties referenced above, we also lease a
number of small sales and marketing offices in the United States
and internationally. As of September 30, 2010, we were
productively utilizing substantially all of the space in our
facilities, except for space identified above as unoccupied, or
that has been subleased to third parties.
|
|
Item 3.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
Like many companies in the software industry, we have from time
to time been notified of claims that we may be infringing
certain intellectual property rights of others. These claims
have been referred to counsel, and they are in various stages of
evaluation and negotiation. If it appears necessary or
desirable, we may seek licenses for these intellectual property
rights. There is no assurance that licenses will be offered by
all claimants, that the terms of any
17
offered licenses will be acceptable to us or that in all cases
the dispute will be resolved without litigation, which may be
time consuming and expensive, and may result in injunctive
relief or the payment of damages by us.
|
|
Item 4.
|
[Removed
and Reserved]
|
18
PART II
|
|
Item 5.
|
Market
for the Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder
Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
Market
Information
Our common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market
under the symbol NUAN. The following table sets
forth, for our fiscal quarters indicated, the high and low sales
prices of our common stock, in each case as reported on the
NASDAQ Global Select Market.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Fiscal 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter
|
|
$
|
6.18
|
|
|
$
|
14.28
|
|
Second quarter
|
|
|
7.58
|
|
|
|
11.29
|
|
Third quarter
|
|
|
10.50
|
|
|
|
14.61
|
|
Fourth quarter
|
|
|
10.90
|
|
|
|
15.04
|
|
Fiscal 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter
|
|
$
|
13.11
|
|
|
$
|
16.31
|
|
Second quarter
|
|
|
14.12
|
|
|
|
17.41
|
|
Third quarter
|
|
|
14.85
|
|
|
|
18.55
|
|
Fourth quarter
|
|
|
14.45
|
|
|
|
17.68
|
|
Holders
As of October 31, 2010, there were 856 stockholders of
record of our common stock.
Dividend
Policy
We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our common
stock. We currently expect to retain future earnings, if any, to
finance the growth and development of our business and do not
anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
Furthermore, the terms of our credit facility place restrictions
on our ability to pay dividends, except for stock dividends.
Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities
We have not announced any currently effective authorization to
repurchase shares of our common stock.
19
|
|
Item 6.
|
Selected
Consolidated Financial Data
|
The following selected consolidated financial data is not
necessarily indicative of the results of future operations and
should be read in conjunction with Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations and our consolidated financial statements and
related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
(as adjusted for the retrospective application of FASB
ASC 470-20
in 2009, 2008 and 2007).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended September 30,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
1,118.9
|
|
|
$
|
950.4
|
|
|
$
|
868.5
|
|
|
$
|
602.0
|
|
|
$
|
388.5
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
709.6
|
|
|
|
590.8
|
|
|
|
552.8
|
|
|
|
404.1
|
|
|
|
267.5
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
32.9
|
|
|
|
57.6
|
|
|
|
32.6
|
|
|
|
39.0
|
|
|
|
8.4
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
18.0
|
|
|
|
40.4
|
|
|
|
14.6
|
|
|
|
22.5
|
|
|
|
15.1
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(19.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
(19.4
|
)
|
|
$
|
(37.0
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14.9
|
)
|
|
$
|
(22.9
|
)
|
Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Share Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.08
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.18
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.08
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.14
|
)
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
|
|
|
287.4
|
|
|
|
253.6
|
|
|
|
209.8
|
|
|
|
176.4
|
|
|
|
163.9
|
|
Financial Position:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents and short and long-term marketable
securities
|
|
$
|
550.0
|
|
|
$
|
527.0
|
|
|
$
|
261.6
|
|
|
$
|
187.0
|
|
|
$
|
112.3
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
3,769.7
|
|
|
|
3,499.5
|
|
|
|
2,846.0
|
|
|
|
2,172.6
|
|
|
|
1,235.1
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion
|
|
|
851.0
|
|
|
|
848.9
|
|
|
|
847.3
|
|
|
|
846.1
|
|
|
|
350.0
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
2,297.2
|
|
|
|
2,043.0
|
|
|
|
1,471.7
|
|
|
|
931.9
|
|
|
|
576.6
|
|
Selected Data and Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working capital
|
|
$
|
459.2
|
|
|
$
|
376.6
|
|
|
$
|
133.5
|
|
|
$
|
164.9
|
|
|
$
|
51.3
|
|
Depreciation of property and equipment
|
|
|
21.6
|
|
|
|
18.7
|
|
|
|
16.4
|
|
|
|
12.1
|
|
|
|
8.4
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
135.6
|
|
|
|
115.4
|
|
|
|
82.6
|
|
|
|
37.7
|
|
|
|
30.1
|
|
Gross margin percentage
|
|
|
63.4
|
%
|
|
|
62.2
|
%
|
|
|
63.7
|
%
|
|
|
67.1
|
%
|
|
|
68.8
|
%
|
|
|
Item 7.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
The following Managements Discussion and Analysis is
intended to help the reader understand the results of operations
and financial condition of our business. Managements
Discussion and Analysis is provided as a supplement to, and
should be read in conjunction with, our consolidated financial
statements and the accompanying notes to the consolidated
financial statements.
Forward-Looking
Statements
This Annual Report on
Form 10-K
contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 that involve
risks, uncertainties and assumptions that, if they never
materialize or if they prove incorrect, could cause our
consolidated results to differ materially from those expressed
or implied by such forward-looking statements. These
forward-looking statements include predictions regarding:
|
|
|
|
|
our future revenue, cost of revenue, research and development
expenses, selling, general and administrative expenses,
amortization of intangible assets and gross margin;
|
|
|
|
our strategy relating to our core markets;
|
|
|
|
the potential of future product releases;
|
|
|
|
our product development plans and investments in research and
development;
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
future acquisitions, and anticipated benefits from acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
international operations and localized versions of our
products; and
|
|
|
|
legal proceedings and litigation matters.
|
You can identify these and other forward-looking statements by
the use of words such as may, will,
should, expects, plans,
anticipates, believes,
estimates, predicts,
intends, potential, continue
or the negative of such terms, or other comparable terminology.
Forward-looking statements also include the assumptions
underlying or relating to any of the foregoing statements. Our
actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in
these forward-looking statements for many reasons, including the
risks described in Item 1A Risk
Factors and elsewhere in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking
statements, which speak only as of the date of this Annual
Report on
Form 10-K.
We undertake no obligation to publicly release any revisions to
the forward-looking statements or reflect events or
circumstances after the date of this document.
Overview
Nuance Communications, Inc. is a leading provider of voice and
language solutions for businesses and consumers around the
world. Our technologies, applications and services make the user
experience more compelling by transforming the way people
interact with devices and systems. Our solutions are used every
day by millions of people and thousands of businesses for tasks
and services such as requesting information from a phone-based
self-service solution, dictating medical records, searching the
mobile Web by voice, entering a destination into a navigation
system, or working with PDF documents. Our solutions help make
these interactions, tasks and experiences more productive,
compelling and efficient.
Our technologies address our four core markets:
|
|
|
|
|
Healthcare. We provide comprehensive dictation
and transcription solutions and services that automate the input
and management of medical information. Our hosted and on-premise
solutions provide platforms to generate and distribute clinical
documentation through the use of advanced dictation and
transcription features, and allow us to deliver scalable, highly
productive medical transcription solutions. Our solutions also
enable us to accelerate future innovation to transform the way
healthcare providers document patient care, through improved
interface with electronic medical records and extraction of
clinical information to support the billing and insurance
reimbursement processes. We also offer speech recognition
solutions for radiology, cardiology, pathology and related
specialties, that help healthcare providers dictate, edit and
sign reports without manual transcription.
|
|
|
|
Mobile and Consumer. Our portfolio of mobile
and consumer solutions and services includes an integrated suite
of voice control and
text-to-speech
solutions, dictation applications, predictive text technologies,
mobile messaging services and emerging services such as
dictation, Web search and
voicemail-to-text.
Our suite of Dragon general purpose desktop and portable
computer dictation applications increases productivity by using
speech to create documents, streamline repetitive and complex
tasks, input data, complete forms and automate manual
transcription processes. In particular, we have focused in
recent quarters on integrating our Dragon technology and brand
initiatives across mobile and consumer markets.
|
|
|
|
Enterprise. We deliver a portfolio of customer
service business intelligence and authentication solutions that
are designed to help companies better support, understand and
communicate with their customers. Our hosted and on-premise
solutions include the use of technologies such as speech
recognition, natural language understanding,
text-to-speech,
biometric voice recognition and analytics to automate caller
identification and authorization, call steering, completion of
tasks such as updates, purchases and information retrieval, and
automated outbound notifications. In addition, we offer
solutions that can meet customer care needs through direct
interaction with thin-client applications on cell phones,
enabling customers to very quickly retrieve relevant
information. Our solutions improve the customer experience,
increase the use of self-service and enable new revenue
opportunities.
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
Imaging. Our imaging solutions offer
comprehensive PDF applications designed specifically for
business users, optical character recognition technology to
deliver highly accurate document and PDF conversion, and
applications that combine PDF creation with network scanning to
quickly enable distribution of documents to users desktops
or to enterprise applications, as well as software development
toolkits for independent software vendors.
|
We leverage our global professional services organization and
our extensive network of partners to design and deploy
innovative solutions for businesses and organizations around the
globe. We market and sell our products directly through a
dedicated sales force and through our
e-commerce
website, and also through a global network of resellers,
including system integrators, independent software vendors,
value-added resellers, hardware vendors, telecommunications
carriers and distributors.
Confronted by dramatic increases in electronic information,
consumers, business personnel and healthcare professionals must
use a variety of resources to retrieve information, transcribe
patient records, conduct transactions and perform other
job-related functions. We believe that the power of our
solutions can transform the way people use the Internet,
telecommunications systems, electronic medical records, wireless
and mobile networks and related corporate infrastructure to
conduct business.
We have built a world-class portfolio of intellectual property,
technologies, applications and solutions through both internal
development and acquisitions. We expect to continue to pursue
opportunities to broaden these assets and expand our customer
base through acquisitions. In evaluating the financial condition
and operating performance of our business, management focuses on
revenue, earnings, gross margins, operating margins and cash
flow from operations. A summary of these key financial metrics
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010, as compared
to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue increased by $168.5 million to
$1,118.9 million;
|
|
|
|
Net loss decreased by $0.3 million to $19.1 million;
|
|
|
|
Gross margins increased by 1.2 percentage points to 63.4%;
|
|
|
|
Operating margins declined by 3.2 percentage points to
2.9%; and
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by operating activities for the year ended
September 30, 2010 was $296.3 million, an increase of
$37.6 million from the same period in the prior fiscal year.
|
Strategy
In fiscal 2011, we will continue to focus on growth by providing
market-leading, value-added solutions for our customers and
partners through a broad set of technologies, service offerings
and channel capabilities. We will also continue to focus on
expense discipline and acquisition synergies to improve gross
margins and operating margins. We intend to pursue growth
through the following key elements of our strategy:
|
|
|
|
|
Extend Technology Leadership. Our solutions
are recognized as among the best in their respective categories.
We intend to leverage our global research and development
organization and broad portfolio of technologies, applications
and intellectual property to foster technological innovation and
maintain customer preference for our solutions. We also intend
to invest in our engineering resources and seek new
technological advancements that further expand the addressable
markets for our solutions.
|
|
|
|
Broaden Expertise in Vertical
Markets. Businesses are increasingly turning to
Nuance for comprehensive solutions rather than for a single
technology product. We intend to broaden our expertise and
capabilities to deliver targeted solutions for a range of
industries including mobile device manufacturers, healthcare,
telecommunications, financial services and government
administration. We also intend to expand our global sales and
professional services capabilities to help our customers and
partners design, integrate and deploy innovative solutions.
|
|
|
|
Increase Subscription and Transaction Based Recurring
Revenue. We intend to increase our subscription
and transaction based offerings in our core markets. The
expansion of our subscription or transaction based
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
solutions will enable us to deliver applications that our
customers use on a repeat basis, and pay for on a per use basis,
providing us with the opportunity to enjoy the benefits of
recurring revenue streams.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expand Global Presence. We intend to further
expand our international resources to better serve our global
customers and partners and to leverage opportunities in emerging
markets such as Asia and Latin America. We continue to add
regional executives and sales employees in different geographic
regions to better address demand for voice and language based
solutions and services.
|
|
|
|
Pursue Strategic Acquisitions and
Partnerships. We have selectively pursued
strategic acquisitions to expand our technology, solutions and
resources to complement our organic growth. We have also formed
key partnerships with other important companies in our markets
of interest, and intend to continue to do so in the future where
it will enhance the value of our business. We have proven
experience in integrating businesses and technologies and in
delivering enhanced value to our customers, partners, employees
and shareholders. We intend to continue to pursue acquisitions
that enhance our solutions, serve specific vertical markets and
strengthen our technology portfolio.
|
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
The following table presents, as a percentage of total revenue,
certain selected financial data for fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008
(as adjusted for the retrospective application of FASB
ASC 470-20
in 2009 and 2008).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product and licensing
|
|
|
42.3
|
%
|
|
|
39.3
|
%
|
|
|
47.7
|
%
|
Professional services and hosting
|
|
|
41.4
|
|
|
|
43.3
|
|
|
|
35.2
|
|
Maintenance and support
|
|
|
16.3
|
|
|
|
17.4
|
|
|
|
17.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of product and licensing
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
Cost of professional services and hosting
|
|
|
25.1
|
|
|
|
26.8
|
|
|
|
24.6
|
|
Cost of maintenance and support
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
Cost of revenue from amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
63.4
|
|
|
|
62.2
|
|
|
|
63.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
13.6
|
|
|
|
12.3
|
|
|
|
13.0
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
23.8
|
|
|
|
22.9
|
|
|
|
26.2
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
|
|
11.3
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
7.9
|
|
|
|
8.1
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
In-process research and development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
Acquisition-related costs, net
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
Restructuring and other charges (credits), net
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
60.5
|
|
|
|
56.1
|
|
|
|
59.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
6.1
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(3.0
|
)
|
|
|
(3.8
|
)
|
|
|
(6.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
(2.6
|
)
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(1.7
|
)%
|
|
|
(2.0
|
)%
|
|
|
(4.3
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
Total
Revenues
The following tables show total revenues from our four core
market groups and revenue by geographic location, based on the
location of our customers, in dollars and percentage change
(dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
2010 vs
|
|
|
2009 vs
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Healthcare
|
|
$
|
444.6
|
|
|
$
|
369.4
|
|
|
$
|
289.3
|
|
|
|
20.4
|
%
|
|
|
27.7
|
%
|
Mobile and Consumer
|
|
|
297.3
|
|
|
|
209.1
|
|
|
|
243.6
|
|
|
|
42.2
|
%
|
|
|
(14.2
|
)%
|
Enterprise
|
|
|
293.9
|
|
|
|
302.2
|
|
|
|
255.7
|
|
|
|
(2.7
|
)%
|
|
|
18.2
|
%
|
Imaging
|
|
|
83.1
|
|
|
|
69.7
|
|
|
|
79.9
|
|
|
|
19.2
|
%
|
|
|
(12.8
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenues
|
|
$
|
1,118.9
|
|
|
$
|
950.4
|
|
|
$
|
868.5
|
|
|
|
17.7
|
%
|
|
|
9.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
802.0
|
|
|
$
|
706.9
|
|
|
$
|
669.3
|
|
|
|
13.5
|
%
|
|
|
5.6
|
%
|
International
|
|
|
316.9
|
|
|
|
243.5
|
|
|
|
199.2
|
|
|
|
30.1
|
%
|
|
|
22.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
1,118.9
|
|
|
$
|
950.4
|
|
|
$
|
868.5
|
|
|
|
17.7
|
%
|
|
|
9.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
2010 Compared to Fiscal 2009
The increase in total revenue for fiscal 2010, as compared to
fiscal 2009, was driven by a combination of organic growth and
contributions from acquisitions. The Healthcare revenue increase
is primarily made up of organic growth in sales of our Dragon
Medical products, on-demand solutions as well as SpeechMagic
solutions. Mobile and Consumer revenue increased primarily
driven by the growth in sales of our predictive text solutions,
automotive solutions, connected mobile services and our fourth
quarter launch of Dragon Naturally Speaking 11. Enterprise
revenue decreased as the trend toward customer preference for
on-demand
solutions continues which impacts the timing of revenue
recognition. Imaging revenue increased primarily as a result of
contributions from our acquisitions of eCopy, Inc. and
X-Solutions Group B.V. and growth in our core imaging solutions.
Based on the location of our customers, the geographic split for
fiscal 2010 was 72% of total revenue in the United States and
28% internationally, as compared to 74% of total revenue in the
United States and 26% internationally for the same period last
year. The increase in the proportion of revenue generated
internationally during fiscal 2010 as compared to fiscal 2009
was primarily due to contributions from our acquisition of
SpinVox in fiscal 2010, as well as the increase in revenue
contributions from our predictive text products and SpeechMagic
solutions, which are sold predominantly outside the United
States.
Fiscal
2009 Compared to Fiscal 2008
The increase in total revenue for fiscal 2009, as compared to
fiscal 2008, was driven by a combination of organic growth and
contributions from acquisitions. Healthcare revenue increased
primarily driven by contributions from our acquisitions of
eScription and PSRS, and organic growth of our on-demand
solution. Enterprise revenue increased primarily driven by
contributions from our acquisition of SNAPin, as well as growth
in our hosted, on-demand solutions. Mobile and Consumer revenue
decreased primarily due to a general decline in consumer
spending due to economic conditions resulting in a decline in
sales of our automotive solutions and Dragon Naturally Speaking
consumer products. Imaging revenue decreased primarily due to a
decline in Windows-based software sales and a general decline in
corporate spending due to economic conditions.
Based on the location of our customers, the geographic split for
fiscal 2009 was 74% of total revenue in the United States and
26% internationally, as compared to 77% of total revenue in the
United States and 23% internationally for fiscal 2008. The
increase in the proportion of revenue generated internationally
was primarily due to contributions from our acquisition of PSRS
near the end of fiscal 2008.
24
Product
and Licensing Revenue
Product and licensing revenue primarily consists of sales and
licenses of our technology. The following table shows product
and licensing revenue, in dollars and as a percentage of total
revenue (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
2010 vs
|
|
|
2009 vs
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Product and licensing revenue
|
|
$
|
473.5
|
|
|
$
|
373.4
|
|
|
$
|
414.4
|
|
|
|
26.8
|
%
|
|
|
(9.9
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of total revenues
|
|
|
42.3
|
%
|
|
|
39.3
|
%
|
|
|
47.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
2010 Compared to Fiscal 2009
The increase in product and licensing revenue for fiscal 2010,
as compared to fiscal 2009, consisted of a $57.8 million
increase in Mobile and Consumer revenue primarily driven by the
growth in sales of our predictive text products, automotive
solutions as well as our fourth quarter launch of Dragon
Naturally Speaking 11. Healthcare revenue increased
$37.7 million primarily driven by increased sales of our
Dragon Medical products and SpeechMagic solutions. Imaging
revenue increased $9.9 million primarily as a result of our
acquisitions of eCopy and X-Solutions in fiscal 2009. Enterprise
revenue decreased $5.4 million primarily due to the
continued migration of customers to our on-demand solutions. The
growth in our product and licensing revenue streams outpaced the
relative growth of our other revenue types, resulting in the
3.0 percentage point increase as a percent of total revenue.
Fiscal
2009 Compared to Fiscal 2008
The decrease in product and licensing revenue for fiscal 2009,
as compared to fiscal 2008, consisted of a $40.9 million
decrease in Mobile and Consumer revenue primarily due to a
general decline in consumer spending due to economic conditions
resulting in a decline in sales of our automotive solutions
together with an $11.3 million decrease in Imaging revenue
primarily due to a decline in Windows-based software sales and a
general decline in corporate spending due to economic
conditions. Healthcare product and licensing revenue increased
$10.4 million driven primarily by our acquisition of PSRS
in September 2008. As a percentage of total revenue, product and
licensing revenue decreased 8.4 percentage points primarily
due to changes in revenue mix attributable to the accelerated
growth in professional services and hosting revenue relative to
product and licensing revenue.
Professional
Services and Hosting Revenue
Professional services revenue primarily consists of consulting,
implementation and training services for speech customers.
Hosting revenue primarily relates to delivering hosted
transcription and dictation services over a specified term, as
well as self-service, on-demand offerings to carriers and
enterprises. The following table shows professional services and
hosting revenue, in dollars and as a percentage of total revenue
(dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
2010 vs
|
|
|
2009 vs
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Professional services and hosting revenue
|
|
$
|
463.5
|
|
|
$
|
411.4
|
|
|
$
|
305.5
|
|
|
|
12.7
|
%
|
|
|
34.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of total revenues
|
|
|
41.4
|
%
|
|
|
43.3
|
%
|
|
|
35.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
2010 Compared to Fiscal 2009
The increase in professional services and hosting revenue for
fiscal 2010, as compared to fiscal 2009, consisted of a
$31.8 million increase in Healthcare revenue resulting
largely from the growth of our on-demand solutions. In the
fourth quarter of fiscal 2010, the annualized line run-rate in
our healthcare on-demand business was
25
approximately 3.334 billion lines per year, up 14% from
2.917 billion lines per year during the fourth quarter of
fiscal 2009. The annualized line run-rate is determined by the
number of lines actually billed in a given quarter, multiplied
by four. Mobile and Consumer revenue increased
$28.5 million primarily due to contributions from our
connected mobile services. Additionally, Enterprise professional
and hosting revenue decreased $9.4 million. Our backlog
hours in enterprise professional services were
328,000 hours as of September 30, 2010, compared to
248,000 hours as of September 30, 2009. Enterprise
professional services backlog hours reflect the accumulated
estimated hours necessary to fulfill all of our existing,
executed professional services contracts within the enterprise
business, including those that are cancelable by customers,
based on the original estimate of hours sold. As a percentage of
total revenue, professional services and hosting revenue
decreased 1.9 percentage points as compared to the
corresponding period in the prior year, primarily due to the
strong growth in the product and licensing revenue relative to
professional services and hosting revenue.
Fiscal
2009 Compared to Fiscal 2008
The increase in professional services and hosting revenue for
fiscal 2009, as compared to fiscal 2008, consisted of a
$62.2 million increase in Healthcare revenue primarily as a
result of our acquisition of eScription as well as organic
growth of our on-demand solutions. Additionally, Enterprise
revenue increased $41.4 million primarily due to
contributions from our acquisition of SNAPin, and growth in our
hosted, on-demand solutions. The organic growth together with
the acquired revenue streams outpaced the relative growth of our
other revenue types, resulting in an 8.1 percentage point
increase in professional services and hosting revenue as a
percentage of total revenue.
Maintenance
and Support Revenue
Maintenance and support revenue primarily consists of technical
support and maintenance services. The following table shows
maintenance and support revenue, in dollars and as a percentage
of total revenue (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
2010 vs
|
|
|
2009 vs
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Maintenance and support revenue
|
|
$
|
181.9
|
|
|
$
|
165.6
|
|
|
$
|
148.6
|
|
|
|
9.8
|
%
|
|
|
11.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of total revenues
|
|
|
16.3
|
%
|
|
|
17.4
|
%
|
|
|
17.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
2010 Compared to Fiscal 2009
The increase in maintenance and support revenue for fiscal 2010,
as compared to fiscal 2009, consisted primarily of a
$6.5 million increase in Enterprise revenue, driven by
continued organic growth, a $5.6 million increase in
Healthcare revenue as a result of the expansion of our current
installed base and a $2.3 million increase in Imaging
revenue primarily due to contributions from growth in sales of
our core imaging products and our acquisition of X-Solutions.
Fiscal
2009 Compared to Fiscal 2008
The increase in maintenance and support revenue for fiscal 2009,
as compared to fiscal 2008, consisted primarily of a
$7.7 million increase related to the expansion of our
current installed base of Healthcare solutions, and a
$4.2 million increase in Enterprise and a $4.0 million
increase in Mobile and Consumer maintenance and support revenue,
driven by organic growth.
26
COSTS AND
EXPENSES
Cost of
Product and Licensing Revenue
Cost of product and licensing revenue primarily consists of
material and fulfillment costs, manufacturing and operations
costs and third-party royalty expenses. The following table
shows cost of product and licensing revenue, in dollars and as a
percentage of product and licensing revenue (dollars in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
2010 vs
|
|
|
2009 vs
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Cost of product and licensing revenue
|
|
$
|
49.6
|
|
|
$
|
37.3
|
|
|
$
|
45.7
|
|
|
|
33.0
|
%
|
|
|
(18.4
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of product and licensing revenue
|
|
|
10.5
|
%
|
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
|
|
11.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
2010 Compared to Fiscal 2009
The increase in cost of product and licensing revenue for fiscal
2010, as compared to fiscal 2009, was primarily due to a
$3.1 million increase in Mobile and Consumer costs related
to our predictive text, automotive solutions and our fourth
quarter launch of Dragon Naturally Speaking 11, as well a
$4.6 million increase in Healthcare costs related to
increased sales of Dragon Medical and increased costs in our
transcription business. The cost of product and licensing
revenue also increased as a result of a $2.3 million
increase in Imaging costs related to our eCopy acquisition and a
$2.4 million increase in Enterprise costs. Gross margin
relative to our product and licensing revenue remained
relatively constant during the period.
Fiscal
2009 Compared to Fiscal 2008
The decrease in cost of product and licensing revenue for fiscal
2009, as compared to fiscal 2008, was primarily due to a
$4.6 million decrease in Healthcare costs, a
$2.7 million decrease in Imaging costs due to a decline in
Windows-based software sales, and a $1.6 million decrease
in Mobile and Consumer costs as a result of a general decline in
consumer spending and a decline in sales of our automotive
solutions. The cost of product and licensing revenue decreased
as a percentage of revenue due to a change in the revenue mix
towards products with higher margins.
Cost of
Professional Services and Hosting Revenue
Cost of professional services and hosting revenue primarily
consists of compensation for consulting personnel, outside
consultants and overhead, as well as the hardware and
communications fees that support our hosted, on-demand
solutions. The following table shows cost of professional
services and hosting revenue, in dollars and as a percentage of
professional services and hosting revenue (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
2010 vs
|
|
|
2009 vs
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Cost of professional services and hosting revenue
|
|
$
|
280.7
|
|
|
$
|
254.8
|
|
|
$
|
214.0
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
%
|
|
|
19.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of professional services and hosting revenue
|
|
|
60.6
|
%
|
|
|
61.9
|
%
|
|
|
70.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
2010 Compared to Fiscal 2009
The increase in cost of professional services and hosting
revenue for fiscal 2010, as compared to fiscal 2009, was
primarily due to a $35.9 million increase in Mobile and
Consumer costs driven by growth in our connected mobile
services, a $1.5 million increase in Healthcare and a
$1.4 million increase in Imaging costs driven by our eCopy
acquisition. These increases are partially offset by a
$12.8 million decrease in Enterprise costs. Gross margin
27
relative to our professional services and hosting revenue
increased 1.3 percentage points primarily due to growth in
our higher margin healthcare on-demand business and improved
professional services utilization rates.
Fiscal
2009 Compared to Fiscal 2008
The increase in cost of professional services and hosting
revenue for fiscal 2009, as compared to fiscal 2008, was
primarily due to a $24.7 million increase in Enterprise
costs as a result of our acquisition of SNAPin and growth in our
on-demand solutions. Additional drivers include a
$13.8 million increase in Healthcare costs related to our
eScription and PSRS acquisitions and a $2.2 million
increase in Mobile and Consumer costs. Gross margin relative to
our professional services and hosting revenue increased
8.1 percentage points as a result of growth in our higher
margin hosted, on-demand business.
Cost of
Maintenance and Support Revenue
Cost of maintenance and support revenue primarily consists of
compensation for product support personnel and overhead. The
following table shows cost of maintenance and support revenue,
in dollars and as a percentage of maintenance and support
revenue (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
2010 vs
|
|
|
2009 vs
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Cost of maintenance and support revenue
|
|
$
|
31.3
|
|
|
$
|
29.1
|
|
|
$
|
31.5
|
|
|
|
7.6
|
%
|
|
|
(7.6
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of maintenance and support revenue
|
|
|
17.2
|
%
|
|
|
17.6
|
%
|
|
|
21.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
2010 Compared to Fiscal 2009
The increase in cost of maintenance and support revenue for
fiscal 2010, as compared to fiscal 2009, was primarily due to a
$1.8 million increase in Imaging costs as a result of our
eCopy and X-solutions acquisitions and a $0.4 million
increase in Mobile and Consumer costs. Gross margin relative to
our maintenance and support revenue remained relatively constant
during the period.
Fiscal
2009 Compared to Fiscal 2008
The decrease in cost of maintenance and support revenue for
fiscal 2009, as compared to fiscal 2008, was primarily due to a
$2.6 million decrease in Healthcare costs as a result of
effective cost containment actions. As a percentage of revenue,
cost of maintenance and support revenue decreased due to
effective cost controls in our core business and changes in the
overall revenue mix.
Research
and Development Expense
Research and development expense primarily consists of salaries,
benefits and overhead relating to engineering staff. The
following table shows research and development expense, in
dollars and as a percentage of total revenue (dollars in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
2010 vs
|
|
|
2009 vs
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Research and development expense
|
|
$
|
152.1
|
|
|
$
|
116.8
|
|
|
$
|
112.8
|
|
|
|
30.2
|
%
|
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of total revenues
|
|
|
13.6
|
%
|
|
|
12.3
|
%
|
|
|
13.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
2010 Compared to Fiscal 2009
The increase in research and development expense for fiscal
2010, as compared to fiscal 2009, primarily consisted of a
$16.7 million increase in services from a third party
related to the research collaboration agreements
28
discussed in Note 2 to the audited consolidated financial
statements, a $16.5 million increase in compensation and
temporary employee expenses attributable to the additional
headcount and other resources from our acquisitions during the
period, and a $2.9 million increase in infrastructure
investment to support ongoing research and development projects.
To date, we have not capitalized any software development costs.
Fiscal
2009 Compared to Fiscal 2008
The increase in research and development expense for fiscal
2009, as compared to fiscal 2008, primarily consisted of a
$10.8 million increase in infrastructure investment to
support ongoing research and development projects, which was
partially offset by a $6.4 million decrease in compensation
expense primarily driven by decrease in
stock-based
compensation expense.
Sales and
Marketing Expense
Sales and marketing expense includes salaries and benefits,
commissions, advertising, direct mail, public relations,
tradeshow costs and other costs of marketing programs, travel
expenses associated with our sales organization and overhead.
The following table shows sales and marketing expense, in
dollars and as a percentage of total revenue (dollars in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
2010 vs
|
|
|
2009 vs
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Sales and marketing expense
|
|
$
|
266.2
|
|
|
$
|
217.8
|
|
|
$
|
227.7
|
|
|
|
22.2
|
%
|
|
|
(4.3
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of total revenues
|
|
|
23.8
|
%
|
|
|
22.9
|
%
|
|
|
26.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
2010 Compared to Fiscal 2009
The increase in sales and marketing expenses for fiscal 2010, as
compared to fiscal 2009, was primarily attributable to a
$35.4 million increase in compensation, including an
$11.1 million increase in stock based compensation expense
driven primarily by the increase in grant values resulting from
increase in our stock price, and other variable costs such as
commissions and travel expenses. An $8.0 million increase
in marketing program spending, including marketing
communications and channel programs, related to new products
launched during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010. Sales and
marketing expense as a percentage of total revenue increased by
0.9 percentage points, as a result of increased investment
in sales and marketing programs to drive revenue growth.
Fiscal
2009 Compared to Fiscal 2008
The decrease in sales and marketing expenses for fiscal 2009, as
compared to fiscal 2008, was primarily attributable to a
$2.3 million decrease in compensation and other variable
costs, such as commissions and travel expenses and a
$4.0 million decrease in marketing program spending. Sales
and marketing expense as a percentage of total revenue decreased
by 3.3 percentage points, as a result of increased cost
efficiencies of our sales and marketing expenditures.
General
and Administrative Expense
General and administrative expense primarily consists of
personnel costs for administration, finance, human resources,
information systems, facilities and general management, fees for
external professional advisors
29
including accountants and attorneys, insurance, and provisions
for doubtful accounts. The following table shows general and
administrative expense, in dollars and as a percentage of total
revenue (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
2010 vs
|
|
|
2009 vs
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
General and administrative expense
|
|
$
|
122.1
|
|
|
$
|
100.5
|
|
|
$
|
98.4
|
|
|
|
21.5
|
%
|
|
|
5.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of total revenues
|
|
|
10.9
|
%
|
|
|
10.6
|
%
|
|
|
11.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
2010 Compared to Fiscal 2009
The increase in general and administrative expense for fiscal
2010, as compared to fiscal 2009, was primarily attributable to
$16.9 million increase in compensation driven primarily by
increase in stock-based compensation grant values resulting from
the increase in our stock price, $2.3 million increase in
other compensation expense and a $2.8 million increase in
legal costs associated with on-going litigation and intellectual
property maintenance. This increase is partially offset by a
reduction of $3.0 million in temporary employees and
professional services as a result of cost containment efforts
and acquisition related synergies.
Fiscal
2009 Compared to Fiscal 2008
The increase in general and administrative expense for fiscal
2009, as compared to fiscal 2008, was primarily attributable to
a $6.5 million increase in compensation associated with our
acquisitions including increase in stock-based compensation as a
result of increases in new grants during the year. This increase
was partially offset by a decrease in bad debt expense of
$2.4 million in fiscal 2009 compared to fiscal 2008 as a
result of a significant receivable written off as bad debt
expense in fiscal 2008.
Amortization
of Intangible Assets
Amortization of acquired patents and core and completed
technology are included in cost of revenue and the amortization
of acquired customer and contractual relationships, non-compete
agreements, acquired tradenames and trademarks, and other
intangibles are included in operating expenses. Customer
relationships are amortized on an accelerated basis based upon
the pattern in which the economic benefits of the customer
relationships are being realized. Other identifiable intangible
assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over their
estimated useful lives. Amortization expense was recorded as
follows (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
2010 vs
|
|
|
2009 vs
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Cost of revenue
|
|
$
|
47.8
|
|
|
$
|
38.4
|
|
|
$
|
24.4
|
|
|
|
24.5
|
%
|
|
|
57.4
|
%
|
Operating expense
|
|
|
87.8
|
|
|
|
77.0
|
|
|
|
58.2
|
|
|
|
14.0
|
%
|
|
|
32.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total amortization expense
|
|
$
|
135.6
|
|
|
$
|
115.4
|
|
|
$
|
82.6
|
|
|
|
17.5
|
%
|
|
|
39.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of total revenues
|
|
|
12.1
|
%
|
|
|
12.1
|
%
|
|
|
9.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
2010 Compared to Fiscal 2009
The increase in amortization of intangible assets for fiscal
2010, compared to fiscal 2009, was primarily attributable to the
amortization of acquired customer relationship and core
technology intangible assets from our acquisitions of eCopy in
September 2009 and SpinVox in December 2009. Fiscal 2010
amortization expense also increased over fiscal 2009 due to our
acquisition and licensing of certain technology from
third-parties during fiscal 2009 and 2010.
30
Fiscal
2009 Compared to Fiscal 2008
The increase in amortization of intangible assets for fiscal
2009, compared to fiscal 2008, was primarily attributable to the
amortization of acquired customer relationship and core
technology intangible assets from our acquisitions of eScription
in May 2008, PSRS in September 2008, SNAPin in October 2008, and
our acquisitions during the third quarter of fiscal 2009. Fiscal
2009 amortization expense also increased over fiscal 2008 due to
our acquisition and licensing of certain technology from other
third-parties during 2009.
Based on our balance of amortizable intangible assets as of
September 30, 2010, and assuming no impairment or reduction
in expected lives, we expect amortization of intangible assets
for fiscal 2011 to be $135.3 million.
In-Process
Research and Development
In fiscal 2008, we recorded in-process research and development
charges of $2.6 million in connection with our acquisition
of PSRS. We did not have any in-process research and development
charges for any other acquisitions completed in fiscal 2010,
2009 or 2008.
Acquisition-Related
Costs, Net
Acquisition-related costs include those costs related to
business and other acquisitions, including potential
acquisitions. These costs consist of transition and integration
costs, including retention payments, transitional employee costs
and earn-out payments treated as compensation expense, as well
as the costs of integration-related services provided by
third-parties; professional service fees, including direct
third-party costs of the transaction and post-acquisition legal
and other professional service fees associated with disputes and
regulatory matters related to acquired entities; and adjustments
to acquisition-related items that are required to be marked to
fair value each reporting period, such as contingent
consideration, and other items related to acquisitions for which
the measurement period has ended. Acquisition-related costs were
recorded as follows (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
2010 vs
|
|
|
2009 vs
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Transition and integration costs
|
|
$
|
13.6
|
|
|
$
|
4.7
|
|
|
$
|
8.3
|
|
|
|
189.4
|
%
|
|
|
(43.4
|
)%
|
Professional service fees
|
|
|
17.1
|
|
|
|
15.0
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
14.0
|
%
|
|
|
200.0
|
%
|
Acquisition-related adjustments
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
(4.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(97.5
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Acquisition-related costs, net
|
|
$
|
30.6
|
|
|
$
|
15.7
|
|
|
$
|
13.3
|
|
|
|
94.9
|
%
|
|
|
39.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of total revenue
|
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
|
|
1.7
|
%
|
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
2010 Compared to Fiscal 2009
The increase in acquisition-related costs, net for fiscal year
2010, as compared to fiscal 2009, was largely a result of our
adoption of ASC 805, Business Combinations, on
October 1, 2009, which requires that transaction costs
related to acquisitions be expensed as incurred. We recognized
approximately $9.4 million in transaction costs, included
within professional service fees above, during fiscal 2010 that
would have been included as part of the consideration
transferred and capitalized in periods prior to our adoption of
ASC 805. This includes $2.2 million that had been
capitalized as of September 30, 2009 related to costs
incurred in prior periods that was required to be expensed upon
our adoption of ASC 805. The remainder of the increase was
primarily attributable to an $8.9 million increase in
transition and integration costs primarily driven by our
acquisitions of eCopy and SpinVox.
Fiscal
2009 Compared to Fiscal 2008
The increase in acquisition-related costs, net for fiscal year
2009, as compared to fiscal 2008, was attributable to an
increase in post acquisition legal fees associated with
regulatory matters relating to a fiscal 2008 acquisition and the
Phonetic earn-out arbitration. The increase was offset by a
$3.4 million gain as a result of a final settlement of a
pre-acquisition contingency after the measurement period had
ended.
31
Restructuring
and Other Charges (Credits), Net
The following table sets forth the activity relating to the
restructuring accruals included in Restructuring and Other
Charges (Credits), net, in fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008 (dollars
in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personnel
|
|
|
Facilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related
|
|
|
Costs
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance at October 1, 2007
|
|
$
|
0.3
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.3
|
|
Restructuring and other charges (credits), net
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(4.2
|
)
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2008
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
Restructuring and other charges (credits), net
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(5.0
|
)
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)
|
|
|
(7.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2009
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
Restructuring and other charges (credits), net
|
|
|
9.6
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
8.9
|
|
|
|
18.7
|
|
Non-cash adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6.8
|
)
|
|
|
(6.8
|
)
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(8.4
|
)
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
(2.1
|
)
|
|
|
(10.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2010
|
|
$
|
1.8
|
|
|
$
|
0.3
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For fiscal 2010, we recorded net restructuring and other charges
of $18.7 million, which consisted primarily of
$9.6 million related to the elimination of approximately
175 personnel across multiple functions within our company,
including acquired entities, a $6.8 million write-off of
previously capitalized patent defense costs as a result of
unsuccessful litigation and $2.1 million of contract
termination costs. Excluding the $6.8 million write-off of
previously capitalized patent defense costs, restructuring
charges increased for fiscal 2010, as compared to fiscal 2009,
as a result of current year adoption of the business
combinations guidance in ASC 805. Under the previous
accounting guidance, restructuring costs related to certain
post-acquisition activities to integrate acquired companies were
generally recorded at the date of acquisition, while the
guidance in ASC 805 generally requires that these costs be
recorded to the acquiring companys statement of operations
as the activities are undertaken.
For fiscal 2009, we recorded restructuring and other charges of
$5.4 million, composed primarily of $5.3 million
related to the elimination of approximately 220 personnel
across multiple functions within our company.
Other
Income (Expense), Net
The following table shows other income (expense), net in dollars
and as a percentage of total revenue (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
2010 vs
|
|
|
2009 vs
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
1.2
|
|
|
$
|
3.6
|
|
|
$
|
8.0
|
|
|
|
(66.6
|
)%
|
|
|
(55.0
|
)%
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(41.0
|
)
|
|
|
(47.3
|
)
|
|
|
(62.1
|
)
|
|
|
13.3
|
%
|
|
|
23.8
|
%
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
5.8
|
|
|
|
7.2
|
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
|
(19.4
|
)%
|
|
|
820
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense), net
|
|
$
|
(34.0
|
)
|
|
$
|
(36.5
|
)
|
|
$
|
(55.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of total revenue
|
|
|
(3.0
|
)%
|
|
|
(3.8
|
)%
|
|
|
(6.3
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
2010 Compared to Fiscal 2009
The change in other income (expense), net for fiscal 2010, as
compared to fiscal 2009, was primarily driven by changes in
foreign exchange as a result of the U.S. dollar and British
Pound strengthening against the Euro primarily in the first
three quarters of fiscal 2010, offset by a one time gain taken
in 2009 relating to the foreign currency
32
contracts that were not designated as hedges in fiscal 2009.
Interest income and interest expense were lower due to lower
prevailing market rates.
Fiscal
2009 Compared to Fiscal 2008
The change in other income (expense), net for fiscal 2009, as
compared to fiscal 2008, was primarily driven by gains on
foreign currency forward contracts. During the three months
ended December 31, 2008, we entered into foreign currency
forward contracts to manage exposure on our Euro-denominated
deferred acquisition payment obligation of
44.3 million related to our acquisition of PSRS. The
deferred acquisition payment was paid on October 22, 2009.
These foreign currency contracts were not designated as hedges
and changes in fair value of these contracts were reported in
net earnings as other income (expense). For fiscal 2009, we
recorded a net $8.0 million gain as other income related to
these contracts and the related Euro-denominated obligation. In
addition, gains on other derivative instruments of
$2.3 million were partially offset by a $1.2 million
impairment charge taken on our cost method investment in a
non-public company during the period. Interest income was lower
in fiscal 2009 due to lower prevailing market interest rates.
Interest expense was similarly lower during fiscal 2009 driven
by a decrease in the prevailing average interest rates during
the year related to our variable-interest rate borrowings.
Provision
for Income Taxes
The following table shows the provision for income taxes and the
effective income tax rate (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
2010 vs
|
|
|
2009 vs
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Income tax provision
|
|
$
|
18.0
|
|
|
$
|
40.4
|
|
|
$
|
14.6
|
|
|
|
(55.4
|
)%
|
|
|
176.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective income tax rate
|
|
|
(1,693.3
|
)%
|
|
|
192.3
|
%
|
|
|
(65.0
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
2010 Compared to Fiscal 2009
Our effective income tax rate was (1,693.3)% and 192.3% for
fiscal 2010 and 2009, respectively. The decrease in the rate was
due partially to the adoption of ASC 805, which no longer
requires the release of the valuation allowance on acquired tax
assets to be included as a component of goodwill. Under the new
standard, such benefits are included in the statements of
operations as a reduction to the provision for income taxes.
Also contributing to the decrease was an $8.0 million tax
provision recorded during fiscal 2009 upon our election to treat
the eScription acquisition as an asset purchase, as well as a
$3.2 million tax provision recorded during fiscal 2009 as a
result of a Massachusetts state tax law enactment relating to
the utilization of net operating losses. The decreases were
partially offset by an increase in the fiscal 2010 foreign tax
provision resulting from increased foreign profits in certain
jurisdictions.
Fiscal
2009 Compared to Fiscal 2008
Our effective income tax rate was 192.3% and (65.0)% for fiscal
2009 and 2008, respectively. The increase in the rate was due
primarily to the increase in our valuation allowance with
respect to certain deferred tax assets. This was partially
offset by an $8.0 million charge recorded in the first
quarter of fiscal 2009 upon our election to treat the eScription
acquisition as an asset purchase. This charge in fiscal 2009
represented the reversal of tax benefits associated with a
Massachusetts state tax law enactment recorded in the fourth
quarter of fiscal 2008 when the eScription acquisition was
treated as a stock purchase.
Our tax provision also includes state and foreign tax expense,
which is determined on either a legal entity or separate tax
jurisdiction basis.
33
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash and cash equivalents totaled $516.6 million as of
September 30, 2010, a decrease of $10.4 million as
compared to $527.0 million as of September 30, 2009.
Our working capital, which at September 30, 2010 included
short-term marketable securities of $5.0 million, was
$459.2 million compared to $376.6 million of working
capital at September 30, 2009. In addition, we have
$28.3 million of non-current marketable securities where we
have invested excess cash balances at the end of fiscal 2010. As
of September 30, 2010, our total accumulated deficit was
$281.4 million. We do not expect our accumulated deficit to
impact our future ability to operate the business given our
strong cash and operating cash flow positions, and believe our
current cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities
on-hand are sufficient to meet our operating needs for at least
the next twelve months.
Cash
provided by operating activities
Fiscal
2010 Compared to Fiscal 2009
Cash provided by operating activities for fiscal 2010 was
$296.3 million, an increase of $37.6 million, or 15%,
as compared to cash provided by operating activities of
$258.7 million for fiscal 2009. The increase was primarily
driven by the following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
An increase in cash resulting from a decrease in net loss, after
excluding non-cash adjustment items, of approximately
$45.1 million;
|
|
|
|
An increase in cash of $40.2 million from deferred revenue
primarily attributable to billings of our eCopy imaging
solutions;
|
|
|
|
A decrease in cash of $34.3 million from accounts
receivable primarily attributable to improved collection efforts
and continuous DSO improvements in 2009, while maintaining
consistent receivables balances in 2010; and
|
|
|
|
A decrease in cash from accounts payable and accrued expenses of
$23.6 million primarily attributable to the timing of cash
payments under our normal operating cycles.
|
Fiscal
2009 compared to Fiscal 2008
Cash provided by operating activities for fiscal 2009 was
$258.7 million, an increase of $62.5 million, or 32%,
as compared to cash provided by operating activities of
$196.2 million for fiscal 2008. The increase was primarily
driven by the following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
an increase in cash resulting from a decrease in net loss,
exclusive of non-cash adjustment items, of approximately
$65.7 million mainly attributable to improvement in our
operating margins, as well as the decrease in cash interest
expense on our variable rate debt attributable to lower variable
interest rates during fiscal 2009;
|
|
|
|
An increase in cash from accounts payable and accrued expenses
of $47.8 million primarily attributable to the timing of
cash payments under our normal operating cycles;
|
|
|
|
A decrease in cash of $10.1 million from prepaid expenses
and other assets attributable to individually insignificant
fluctuations in prepaid expenses related to our normal
operations; and
|
|
|
|
A decrease in cash of $28.5 million from accounts
receivable primarily attributable to the significant collection
of acquired unbilled accounts receivable during fiscal 2008 and
the timing of cash collections.
|
34
Cash used
in investing activities
Fiscal
2010 compared to Fiscal 2009
Cash used in investing activities for fiscal 2010 was
$315.6 million, an increase of $131.0 million, or 71%,
as compared to cash used in investing activities of
$184.6 million for fiscal 2009. The net increase was
primarily driven by the following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
An increase in cash payments related to acquisitions of
$104.6 million, primarily driven by the cash paid for the
acquisition of SpinVox and other fiscal 2010 business
acquisitions, the PSRS deferred acquisitions payments, and the
Phonetic earn-out payment;
|
|
|
|
Cash payments of $33.5 million related to our purchase of
marketable securities in fiscal 2010;
|
|
|
|
A decrease of $50.6 million in cash used for acquisitions
of technology; and
|
|
|
|
The use of $22.1 million in restricted cash related to cash
placed in an irrevocable standby letter of credit account for a
fixed obligation in connection with our acquisition of SpinVox.
|
Fiscal
2009 compared to Fiscal 2008
Cash used in investing activities for fiscal 2009 was
$184.6 million, a decrease of $261.5 million, or 59%,
as compared to cash used in investing activities of
$446.1 million for fiscal 2008. The net decrease was
primarily driven by the following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
A decrease in cash payments related to acquisitions of
$293.4 million, primarily driven by the cash payment of
$330.9 million to acquire eScription in May 2008; and
|
|
|
|
An increase of $29.4 million in cash payments to acquire
speech-related patent portfolios and a royalty-free
paid-up
perpetual license to speech-related source code.
|
Cash
provided by financing activities
Fiscal
2010 compared to Fiscal 2009
Cash provided by financing activities for fiscal 2010 was
$9.9 million, a decrease of $179.5 million, or 95%, as
compared to cash provided by financing activities of
$189.4 million for fiscal 2009. The change was primarily
driven by the following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
A decrease of $183.2 million in cash proceeds from the sale
of our common stock. During fiscal 2009, we sold
17.4 million shares of our common stock, together with
warrants to purchase an additional 3.9 million shares of
our common stock, for net proceeds of $175.1 million;
|
|
|
|
An increase of $11.0 million in cash payments to net share
settle employee equity awards, due to an increase in the number
of shares vested and an increase in the intrinsic value of the
shares vested as a result of the overall increase in our stock
price in fiscal 2010 as compared to fiscal 2009; and
|
|
|
|
An increase of $9.7 million in cash proceeds from the
issuance of common stock upon exercise of employee stock options
and pursuant to our employee stock purchase plan.
|
Fiscal
2009 compared to Fiscal 2008
Cash provided by financing activities for fiscal 2009 was
$189.4 million, a decrease of $137.7 million, or 42%,
as compared to cash provided by financing activities of
$327.1 million for fiscal 2008. The change was primarily
driven by the following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
a decrease of $135.0 million in cash proceeds from the sale
of our common stock. During fiscal 2009, we sold
17.4 million shares of our common stock together with
warrants to purchase 3.9 million shares of our common
stock, for net proceeds of $175.1 million as compared to a
sale of 19.2 million shares of our common stock together
with warrants to purchase 3.7 million shares of our common
stock, for net proceeds of $330.6 million during fiscal
2008;
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
a decrease of $6.6 million in cash payments to net share
settle employee equity awards, due to a decrease in the
intrinsic value of the shares vested as a result of the overall
decrease in our stock price in fiscal 2009 as compared to fiscal
2008; and
|
|
|
|
a decrease of $8.3 million in cash proceeds from the
issuance of common stock upon exercise of employee stock options
and pursuant to our employee stock purchase plan, due to a
decrease in the number of options exercised during fiscal 2009
as compared to fiscal 2008.
|
Credit
Facilities and Debt
2.75% Convertible
Debentures
We have $250 million of 2.75% convertible senior debentures
due in 2027 (the 2027 Debentures) that were issued
on August 13, 2007 in a private placement to Citigroup
Global Markets Inc. and Goldman, Sachs & Co. The 2027
Debentures bear an interest rate of 2.75% per annum, payable
semi-annually in arrears beginning on February 15, 2008,
and mature on August 15, 2027 subject to the right of the
holders of the 2027 Debentures to require us to redeem the 2027
Debentures on August 15, 2014, 2017 and 2022. The related
debt discount and debt issuance costs are being amortized to
interest expense using the effective interest rate method
through August 2014. As of September 30, 2010 and 2009, the
ending unamortized discount was $36.3 million and
$44.9 million, respectively, and the ending unamortized
deferred debt issuance costs were $0.4 million and
$0.5 million, respectively. The 2027 Debentures are general
senior unsecured obligations, ranking equally in right of
payment to all of our existing and future unsecured,
unsubordinated indebtedness and senior in right of payment to
any indebtedness that is contractually subordinated to the 2027
Debentures. The 2027 Debentures are effectively subordinated to
our secured indebtedness to the extent of the value of the
collateral securing such indebtedness and are structurally
subordinated to indebtedness and other liabilities of our
subsidiaries. If converted, the principal amount of the 2027
Debentures is payable in cash and any amounts payable in excess
of the $250 million principal amount, will (based on an
initial conversion rate, which represents an initial conversion
price of $19.47 per share, subject to adjustment as defined
therein) be paid in cash or shares of our common stock, at our
election, only in the following circumstances and to the
following extent: (i) on any date during any fiscal quarter
beginning after September 30, 2007 (and only during such
fiscal quarter) if the closing sale price of our common stock
was more than 120% of the then current conversion price for at
least 20 trading days in the period of the 30 consecutive
trading days ending on the last trading day of the previous
fiscal quarter; (ii) during the five consecutive
business-day
period following any five consecutive
trading-day
period in which the trading price for $1,000 principal amount of
the Debentures for each day during such five
trading-day
period was less than 98% of the closing sale price of our common
stock multiplied by the then current conversion rate;
(iii) upon the occurrence of specified corporate
transactions, as described in the indenture for the 2027
Debentures; and (iv) at the option of the holder at any
time on or after February 15, 2027. Additionally, we may
redeem the 2027 Debentures, in whole or in part, on or after
August 20, 2014 at par plus accrued and unpaid interest;
each holder shall have the right, at such holders option,
to require us to repurchase all or any portion of the 2027
Debentures held by such holder on August 15, 2014,
August 15, 2017 and August 15, 2022. Upon conversion,
we will pay cash and shares of our common stock (or, at our
election, cash in lieu of some or all of such common stock), if
any. If we undergo a fundamental change (as described in the
indenture for the 2027 Debentures) prior to maturity, holders
will have the option to require us to repurchase all or any
portion of their debentures for cash at a price equal to 100% of
the principal amount of the debentures to be purchased plus any
accrued and unpaid interest, including any additional interest
to, but excluding, the repurchase date. As of September 30,
2010, no conversion triggers were met. If the conversion
triggers were met, we could be required to repay all or some of
the principal amount in cash prior to the maturity date.
Credit
Facility
We have a credit facility which consists of a $75 million
revolving credit line, including letters of credit, a
$355 million term loan entered into on March 31, 2006,
a $90 million term loan entered into on April 5, 2007
and a $225 million term loan entered into on
August 24, 2007 (the Credit Facility). The term
loans are due March 2013 and the revolving credit line is due
March 2012. As of September 30, 2010, $643.6 million
remained outstanding under the term loans, there were
$21.2 million of letters of credit issued under the
revolving credit line and there were no other outstanding
borrowings under the revolving credit line.
36
The Credit Facility contains covenants, including, among other
things, covenants that restrict our ability and those of our
subsidiaries to incur certain additional indebtedness, create or
permit liens on assets, enter into sale-leaseback transactions,
make loans or investments, sell assets, make certain
acquisitions, pay dividends, or repurchase stock. The agreement
also contains events of default, including failure to make
payments of principal or interest, failure to observe covenants,
breaches of representations and warranties, defaults under
certain other material indebtedness, failure to satisfy material
judgments, a change of control and certain insolvency events. As
of September 30, 2010, we were in compliance with the
covenants under the Credit Facility.
Borrowings under the Credit Facility bear interest at a rate
equal to the applicable margin plus, at our option, either
(a) the base rate (which is the higher of the corporate
base rate of UBS AG, Stamford Branch, or the federal funds rate
plus 0.50% per annum) or (b) LIBOR (equal to (i) the
British Bankers Association Interest Settlement Rates for
deposits in U.S. dollars divided by (ii) one minus the
statutory reserves applicable to such borrowing). The applicable
margin for term loan borrowings under the Credit Facility ranges
from 0.75% to 1.50% per annum with respect to base rate
borrowings and from 1.75% to 2.50% per annum with respect to
LIBOR-based borrowings, depending on our leverage ratio. The
applicable margin for revolving loan borrowings under the Credit
Facility ranges from 0.50% to 1.25% per annum with respect to
base rate borrowings and from 1.50% to 2.25% per annum with
respect to LIBOR-based borrowings, depending upon our leverage
ratio. As of September 30, 2010, our applicable margin for
the term loan was 1.00% for base rate borrowings and 1.75% for
LIBOR-based borrowings. We are required to pay a commitment fee
for unutilized commitments under the revolving credit facility
at a rate ranging from 0.375% to 0.50% per annum, based upon our
leverage ratio. As of September 30, 2010, the commitment
fee rate was 0.375% and the effective interest rate was 2.02%.
We capitalized debt issuance costs related to the Credit
Facility and are amortizing the costs to interest expense using
the effective interest rate method through March 2012 for costs
associated with the revolving credit facility and through March
2013 for costs associated with the term loan. As of
September 30, 2010 and 2009, the ending unamortized
deferred financing fees were $5.8 million and
$7.7 million, respectively, and are included in other
assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.
The Credit Facility is subject to repayment in four equal
quarterly installments of 1% per annum ($6.7 million per
year, not including interest, which is also payable quarterly),
and an annual excess cash flow sweep, as defined in the Credit
Facility, which is payable beginning in the first quarter of
each fiscal year, beginning in fiscal 2008, based on the excess
cash flow generated in the previous fiscal year. We have not
generated excess cash flow in either fiscal 2009 or 2010 and
thus no payments have been required. We will continue to
evaluate the extent to which a payment is due in the first
quarter of future fiscal years based on excess cash flow
generation. At the current time, we are unable to predict the
amount of the outstanding principal, if any, that we may be
required to repay in future years pursuant to the excess cash
flow sweep provisions. Any term loan borrowings not paid through
the baseline repayment, the excess cash flow sweep, or any other
mandatory or optional payments that we may make, will be repaid
upon maturity. If only the baseline repayments are made, the
annual aggregate principal amount of the term loans repaid would
be as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending September 30,
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
6,700
|
|
2012
|
|
|
6,700
|
|
2013
|
|
|
630,163
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
643,563
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our obligations under the Credit Facility are unconditionally
guaranteed by, subject to certain exceptions, each of our
existing and future direct and indirect wholly-owned domestic
subsidiaries. The Credit Facility and the guarantees thereof are
secured by first priority liens and security interests in the
following: 100% of the capital stock of substantially all of our
domestic subsidiaries and 65% of the outstanding voting equity
interests and 100% of the non-voting equity interests of
first-tier foreign subsidiaries, all our material tangible and
intangible assets and those of the guarantors, and any present
and future intercompany debt. The Credit Facility also contains
provisions for mandatory prepayments of outstanding term loans
upon receipt of the following, and subject to certain
exceptions: 100% of net cash proceeds from asset sales, 100% of
net cash proceeds from issuance or incurrence of debt, and
37
100% of extraordinary receipts. We may voluntarily prepay
borrowings under the Credit Facility without premium or penalty
other than breakage costs, as defined with respect to
LIBOR-based loans.
We believe that cash flows from future operations in addition to
cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities on-hand will
be sufficient to meet our working capital, investing, financing
and contractual obligations and the contingent payments for
acquisitions, if any are realized, as they become due for at
least the next twelve months. We also believe that in the event
future operating results are not as planned, that we could take
actions, including restructuring actions and other cost
reduction initiatives, to reduce operating expenses to levels
which, in combination with expected future revenue, will
continue to generate sufficient operating cash flow. In the
event that these actions are not effective in generating
operating cash flows we may be required to issue equity or debt
securities on terms that may be less favorable.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements, Contractual Obligations, Contingent
Liabilities and Commitments
Contractual
Obligations
The following table outlines our contractual payment obligations
as of September 30, 2010 (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Fiscal Year Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual Obligations
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
and 2013
|
|
|
and 2015
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
Credit Facility(2)
|
|
$
|
643.6
|
|
|
$
|
6.7
|
|
|
$
|
636.9
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
2.75% Convertible Senior Debentures(1)
|
|
|
250.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest payable under Credit Facility(2)
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
|
|
12.9
|
|
|
|
19.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest payable under 2.75% Convertible Senior
Debentures(3)
|
|
|
27.6
|
|
|
|
6.9
|
|
|
|
13.8
|
|
|
|
6.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letter of Credit(4)
|
|
|
24.5
|
|
|
|
24.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease obligations and other liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
119.6
|
|
|
|
21.0
|
|
|
|
36.8
|
|
|
|
28.8
|
|
|
|
33.0
|
|
Other lease obligations associated with the closing of duplicate
facilities related to restructurings and acquisitions(5)
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension, minimum funding requirement(6)
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collaboration agreements(7)
|
|
|
65.2
|
|
|
|
20.9
|
|
|
|
41.8
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities assumed(8)
|
|
|
34.2
|
|
|
|
13.9
|
|
|
|
14.6
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual cash obligations
|
|
$
|
1,208.3
|
|
|
$
|
111.3
|
|
|
$
|
768.7
|
|
|
$
|
294.3
|
|
|
$
|
34.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Holders of the 2.75% Senior Convertible Debentures have the
right to require us to repurchase the debentures on
August 15, 2014, 2017 and 2022. |
|
(2) |
|
Interest is due and payable monthly under the Credit Facility,
and principal is paid on a quarterly basis. The amounts included
as interest payable in this table are based on the effective
interest rate as of September 30, 2010 related to the
Credit Facility excluding the effect of our interest rate swaps. |
|
(3) |
|
Interest is due and payable semi-annually under the 2.75%
convertible senior debentures. |
|
(4) |
|
We have placed EUR 18.0 million ($24.5 million based
on the September 30, 2010 exchange rates) in an irrevocable
standby letter of credit account for payment of a fixed
obligation assumed in connection with our acquisition of SpinVox. |
|
(5) |
|
Obligations include contractual lease commitments related to
facilities that were part of restructuring plans entered into in
fiscal 2005, 2008 and 2009. As of September 30, 2010, total
gross lease obligations are $2.2 million and are included
in the contractual obligations herein. This includes
$3.8 million in contractual lease commitments associated
with the implemented plans to eliminate duplicate facilities in
conjunction with |
38
|
|
|
|
|
our acquisitions. As of September 30, 2010, we have
subleased certain of the facilities to unrelated third parties
with total sublease income of $2.2 million through fiscal
2013. |
|
6) |
|
Our U.K. pension plan has a minimum funding requirement of
£859,900 ($1.4 million based on the exchange rate at
September 30, 2010) for each of the next 4 years,
through fiscal 2014. |
|
(7) |
|
Payments under the research collaboration agreements are payable
in cash or common stock at our option. |
|
(8) |
|
Obligations include assumed long-term liabilities relating to
restructuring programs initiated by the predecessor companies
prior to our acquisition of SpeechWorks International, Inc. in
August 2003, and our acquisition of Former Nuance in September
2005. These restructuring programs related to the closing of two
facilities with lease terms set to expire in 2016 and 2012,
respectively. Total contractual obligations under these two
leases are $34.2 million. As of September 30, 2010, we
have
sub-leased
certain of the office space related to these two facilities to
unrelated third parties. Total sublease income under contractual
terms is expected to be $11.6 million, which ranges from
$1.3 million to $3.2 million on an annualized basis
through 2016. |
As a result of our adoption of
ASC 740-10
(formerly referred to as FIN 48, Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes an Interpretation of
FASB Statement No. 109) on October 1, 2007, our
gross liability for unrecognized tax benefits was approximately
$2.5 million. The gross liability as of September 30,
2010 was $12.8 million. We do not expect a significant
change in the amount of unrecognized tax benefits within the
next 12 months. We estimate that none of this amount will
be paid within the next year and we are currently unable to
reasonably estimate the timing of payments for the remainder of
the liability.
Contingent
Liabilities and Commitments
In connection with certain of our acquisitions, we have agreed
to make contingent cash payments to the former shareholders of
certain of the acquired companies. The following represents the
contingent cash payments that we may be required to make.
In connection with our acquisition of SNAPin Software, Inc.
(SNAPin), we agreed to make a contingent earn-out
payment of up to $45.0 million in cash to be paid, if at
all, based on the business achieving certain performance targets
that are measurable from the acquisition date to
December 31, 2009. In April 2010, the Company and the
former shareholders of SNAPin agreed on a final earn-out payment
of $21.2 million and we issued 593,676 shares of our
common stock, valued at $10.2 million, as our first payment
under the earn-out agreement. The remaining balance is payable
in cash or stock, solely at our option, on or before
October 1, 2011 and is included in long-term liabilities as
of September 30, 2010.
In connection with our acquisition of Multi-Vision
Communications, Inc. (Multi-Vision), we agreed to
make contingent earn-out payments of up to $15.0 million,
payable in stock, or cash, solely at our discretion, relating to
earn-out provisions described in the share purchase agreement.
We have notified the former shareholders of Multi-Vision that
the performance targets were not achieved. Through
September 30, 2010, we have not recorded any obligation or
related compensation expense relative to these measures.
In connection with our acquisition of Vocada, Inc.
(Vocada), we agreed to make contingent earn-out
payments of up to $21.0 million, payable in stock, or cash,
solely at our discretion, upon the achievement of certain
financial targets measured over defined periods through
December 31, 2010. Earn-out payments, if any, will be
recorded as incremental purchase price and allocated to
goodwill. We have notified the former shareholders of Vocada
that the financial targets for certain periods were not achieved
and they have requested additional information regarding this
determination. We are currently in discussions with the former
shareholders of Vocada regarding this matter. Through
September 30, 2010, we have not recorded any earn-out
obligation relative to the Vocada acquisition.
In connection with the acquisition of Commissure, Inc.
(Commissure), we agreed to make contingent earn-out
payments of up to $8.0 million, payable in stock, or cash,
solely at our discretion, upon the achievement of certain
financial targets for the fiscal years 2008, 2009 and 2010.
Earn-out payments, if any, will be recorded as incremental
purchase price and allocated to goodwill. We have notified the
former shareholders of Commissure that the financial targets for
the fiscal years 2008 and 2009 were not achieved and the related
contingent earn-out
39
payment was not earned. Through September 30, 2010, we have
not recorded any earn-out obligation relative to the Commissure
acquisition
Financial
Instruments
We use financial instruments to manage our interest rate and
foreign exchange risk. We follow Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 133, Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities, amended by
SFAS No. 138, Accounting for Certain Derivative
Instruments and Certain Hedging Activities, now referred to
as Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards
Codification 815 (ASC 815), for certain designated
forward contracts and interest rate swaps.
To manage the interest rate exposure on our variable-rate
borrowings, we use interest rate swaps to convert specific
variable-rate debt into fixed-rate debt. As of
September 30, 2010, we have two outstanding interest rate
swaps designated as cash flow hedges with an aggregate notional
amount of $200 million. The interest rates on these swaps
are 2.7% and 2.1%, plus the applicable margin for the Credit
Facility, and they expire in October 2010 and November 2010,
respectively. As of September 30, 2010, and 2009, the
aggregate cumulative unrealized gains (losses) related to these
swaps, and a previous swap that matured on March 31, 2009,
were $3.5 million and $(4.0) million, respectively and
were included in accumulated other comprehensive income in the
accompanying balance sheets.
During fiscal 2009 and 2010, we entered into foreign currency
contracts to hedge exposure on the variability of cash flows in
Canadian dollars which are designated as cash flow hedges. At
September 30, 2010 the unsettled contracts had an aggregate
remaining notional value of CAD$13.7 million
($13.3 million based on the September 30, 2010
exchange rate). These contracts settle monthly through October
2011. As of September 30, 2010, the aggregate cumulative
unrealized gains related to these contracts were immaterial.
During fiscal 2010, we entered into foreign currency contracts
to hedge exposure on the variability of cash flows in Hungarian
Forints (HUF) which are designated as cash flow
hedges. At September 30, 2010, the unsettled contracts had
an aggregate remaining notional value of HUF
1,017.0 million ($5.0 million based on the
September 30, 2010 exchange rate). These contracts settle
monthly through October 2011. As of September 30, 2010, the
aggregate cumulative unrealized gains related to these contracts
were immaterial.
We have foreign currency contracts that are not designated as
hedges. Changes in fair value of foreign currency contracts not
qualifying as hedges are reported in earnings as part of other
income (expense), net.
During the three months ended December 31, 2008, we entered
into foreign currency forward contracts to offset foreign
currency exposure on the deferred acquisition payment of
44.3 million related to our acquisition of PSRS,
resulting in a net gain during that period of $8.0 million
included in other income (expense). The foreign currency
contracts matured and were settled on October 22, 2009. The
gain for the period from September 30, 2009 to settlement
on October 22, 2009 was $1.6 million, but was offset
in other income (expense), net by the loss resulting from the
corresponding change in the associated deferred acquisition
payment liability.
During fiscal 2010, we entered into a foreign currency forward
contract to offset foreign currency exposure on a fixed
obligation assumed in connection with our acquisition of
SpinVox. The notional value of the contract is
Euro 18.0 million. The contract matures in December
2010.
From time to time we will enter into agreements that allow us to
issue shares of our common stock as part or all of the
consideration related to partnering and technology acquisition
activities. Generally these shares are issued subject to
security price guarantees which are accounted for as
derivatives. We have determined that these instruments would not
be considered equity instruments if they were freestanding. The
security price guarantees require payment from either us to the
third party, or from the third party to us, based upon the
difference between the price of our common stock on the issue
date and an average price of our common stock approximately six
months following the issue date. Changes in the fair value of
these security price guarantees are reported in earnings in each
period as non-operating income (expense) with other income
(expense), net. During the year ended September 30, 2010,
we received cash payments totaling $7.3 million to settle
agreements that closed during the year.
40
Pension
Plans
We assumed the assets and obligations related to certain defined
benefit pension plans in connection with our acquisition of
Dictaphone, which provide certain retirement and death benefits
for former Dictaphone employees located in the United Kingdom
and Canada. These two pension plans are closed to new
participants. These plans require periodic cash contributions.
The Canadian plan is fully funded and expected to remain fully
funded during fiscal 2011, without additional funding. In fiscal
2010, total cash funding for the UK pension plan was
$1.3 million. For the UK pension plan, we have a minimum
funding requirement of £859,900 (approximately
$1.4 million based on the exchange rate at
September 30, 2010) for each of the next four years,
through fiscal 2014.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
Through September 30, 2010, we have not entered into any
off-balance sheet arrangements or material transactions with
unconsolidated entities or other persons.
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING POLICIES, JUDGMENTS AND ESTIMATES
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and the disclosure
of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the
financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and
expenses during the reporting period. On an ongoing basis, we
evaluate our estimates, assumptions and judgments, including
those related to revenue recognition; allowance for doubtful
accounts and returns; accounting for patent legal defense costs;
the valuation of goodwill, intangible assets and tangible
long-lived assets; accounting for business combinations;
accounting for stock-based compensation; accounting for
derivative instruments; accounting for income taxes and related
valuation allowances; and loss contingencies. Our management
bases its estimates on historical experience, market participant
fair value considerations and various other factors that are
believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual
results could differ from these estimates.
We believe the following critical accounting policies most
significantly affect the portrayal of our financial condition
and results of operations and require our most difficult and
subjective judgments.
Revenue Recognition. We derive revenue from
the following sources: (1) software license agreements,
including royalty and other usage-based arrangements,
(2) post-contract customer support, (3) fixed and
variable fee hosting arrangements and (4) professional
services. Our revenue recognition policies for these revenue
streams are discussed below.
The sale
and/or
license of software products and technology is deemed to have
occurred when a customer either has taken possession of the
related software or technology or has access to take immediate
possession of the software or technology. In select situations,
we sell or license intellectual property in conjunction with, or
in place of, embedding our intellectual property in software. We
recognize revenue from the sale or license of software products
and licensing of technology when (i) persuasive evidence of
an arrangement exists, (ii) delivery has occurred,
(iii) the fee is fixed or determinable and
(iv) collectibility is probable. Vendor-specific objective
evidence (VSOE) of fair value for software and
software-related services exists when a company can support what
the fair value of its software
and/or
software-related services is based on evidence of the prices
charged by the company when the same elements are sold
separately. VSOE of fair value is required, generally, in order
to separate the accounting for various elements in a software
and related services arrangement. We have, in general,
established VSOE of fair value of our post-contract customer
support (PCS), professional services, and training.
Revenue from royalties on sales of our software products by
original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), where no
services are included, is recognized in the quarter earned so
long as we have been notified by the OEM that such royalties are
due, and provided that all other revenue recognition criteria
are met.
Software arrangements generally include PCS, which includes
telephone support and the right to receive unspecified
upgrades/enhancements on a
when-and-if-available
basis, typically for one to five years. Revenue from PCS is
recognized ratably on a straight-line basis over the term that
the maintenance service is provided.
41
Non-software revenue, such as arrangements containing hosting
services where the customer does not take possession of the
software at the outset of the arrangement and has no contractual
right to do so, is recognized when (i) persuasive evidence
of an arrangement exists, (ii) delivery has occurred or
services have been rendered, (iii) the fees are fixed or
determinable and (iv) collectibility is reasonably assured.
For revenue arrangements with multiple elements that are not
considered to be software or software-related, we allocate an
arrangements fees into separate units of accounting based
on fair value. We generally support fair value of our
deliverables based upon the prices we charge when we sell
similar elements separately.
Revenue from products offered on a subscription
and/or
hosted, on-demand basis is recognized in the period the services
are provided, based on a fixed minimum fee
and/or
variable fees based on the volume of activity. Variable
subscription and hosting revenue is recognized as we are
notified by the customer or through management reports that such
revenue is due, provided that all other revenue recognition
criteria are met.
Set-up fees
from arrangements containing hosting services, as well as the
associated direct and incremental costs, are deferred and
recognized ratably over the longer of the contractual lives, or
the expected lives of the customer relationships.
When we provide professional services considered essential to
the functionality of the software, we recognize revenue from the
professional services as well as any related software licenses
on a
percentage-of-completion
basis whereby the arrangement consideration is recognized as the
services are performed as measured by an observable input. In
these circumstances, we separate license revenue from
professional service revenue for income statement presentation
by allocating VSOE of fair value of the professional services as
professional service revenue and the residual portion as license
revenue. We generally determine the
percentage-of-completion
by comparing the labor hours incurred to-date to the estimated
total labor hours required to complete the project. We consider
labor hours to be the most reliable, available measure of
progress on these projects. Adjustments to estimates to complete
are made in the periods in which facts resulting in a change
become known. When the estimate indicates that a loss will be
incurred, such loss is recorded in the period identified.
Significant judgments and estimates are involved in determining
the percent complete of each contract. Different assumptions
could yield materially different results.
When products are sold through distributors or resellers, title
and risk of loss generally passes upon shipment, at which time
the transaction is invoiced and payment is due. Shipments to
distributors and resellers without right of return are
recognized as revenue upon shipment, provided all other revenue
recognition criteria are met. Certain distributors and
value-added resellers have been granted rights of return for as
long as the distributors or resellers hold the inventory. We
cannot estimate historical returns from these distributors and
resellers; and therefore, cannot use such estimates as the basis
upon which to estimate future sales returns. As a result, we
recognize revenue from sales to these distributors and resellers
when the products are sold through to retailers and end-users.
When products are sold directly to retailers or end-users, we
make an estimate of sales returns based on historical
experience. The provision for these estimated returns is
recorded as a reduction of revenue and accounts receivable at
the time that the related revenue is recorded. If actual returns
differ significantly from our estimates, such differences could
have a material impact on our results of operations for the
period in which the actual returns become known.
When maintenance and support contracts renew automatically, we
provide a reserve based on historical experience for contracts
expected to be cancelled for non-payment. All known and
estimated cancellations are recorded as a reduction to revenue
and accounts receivable.
We record consideration given to a reseller as a reduction of
revenue to the extent we have recorded cumulative revenue from
the customer or reseller. However, when we receive an
identifiable benefit in exchange for the consideration, and can
reasonably estimate the fair value of the benefit received, the
consideration is recorded as an operating expense.
We record reimbursements received for
out-of-pocket
expenses as revenue, with offsetting costs recorded as cost of
revenue.
Out-of-pocket
expenses generally include, but are not limited to, expenses
related to transportation, lodging and meals.
42
We record shipping and handling costs billed to customers as
revenue with offsetting costs recorded as cost of revenue.
Our revenue recognition policies require management to make
significant estimates. Management analyzes various factors,
including a review of specific transactions, historical
experience, creditworthiness of customers and current market and
economic conditions. Changes in judgments based upon these
factors could impact the timing and amount of revenue and cost
recognized and thus affects our results of operations and
financial condition.
Business Combinations. We determine and
allocate the purchase price of an acquired company to the
tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed
as well as to in-process research and development as of the
business combination date. The purchase price allocation process
requires us to use significant estimates and assumptions,
including fair value estimates including:
|
|
|
|
|
estimated fair values of intangible assets;
|
|
|
|
expected costs to complete any in-process research and
development projects;
|
|
|
|
estimated fair market values of legal performance commitments to
customers, assumed from the acquiree under existing contractual
obligations (classified as deferred revenue) at the date of
acquisition;
|
|
|
|
estimated fair market values of stock awards assumed from the
acquiree that are included in the purchase price;
|
|
|
|
probability of required payment under contingent consideration
provisions;
|
|
|
|
estimated income tax assets and liabilities assumed from the
acquiree; and
|
|
|
|
estimated fair value of pre-acquisition contingencies assumed
from the acquiree.
|
While we use our best estimates and assumptions as a part of the
purchase price allocation process to accurately value assets
acquired and liabilities assumed at the business combination
date, our estimates and assumptions are inherently uncertain and
subject to refinement. As a result, during the purchase price
allocation period, which is generally one year from the business
combination date, we record adjustments to the assets acquired
and liabilities assumed, with the corresponding offset to
goodwill. Subsequent to the purchase price allocation period any
adjustment to assets acquired or liabilities assumed is included
in operating results in the period in which the adjustment is
determined. For changes in the valuation of intangible assets
between preliminary and final purchase price allocation, the
related amortization is adjusted on a prospective basis.
Although we believe the assumptions and estimates we have made
in the past have been reasonable and appropriate, they are based
in part on historical experience and information obtained from
the management of the acquired companies and are inherently
uncertain. Examples of critical estimates in valuing certain of
the intangible assets we have acquired or may acquire in the
future include but are not limited to:
|
|
|
|
|
future expected cash flows from software license sales, support
agreements, consulting contracts, other customer contracts and
acquired developed technologies and patents;
|
|
|
|
expected costs to develop in-process research and development
projects into commercially viable products and the estimated
cash flows from the projects when completed;
|
|
|
|
the acquired companys brand and competitive position, as
well as assumptions about the period of time the acquired brand
will continue to be used in the combined companys product
portfolio; and
|
|
|
|
discount rates.
|
Unanticipated events and circumstances may occur which may
affect the accuracy or validity of such assumptions, estimates
or actual results.
In connection with the purchase price allocations for our
acquisitions, we estimate the fair market value of legal
performance commitments to customers, which are classified as
deferred revenue. The estimated fair market value of these
obligations is determined and recorded as of the acquisition
date.
43
For a given acquisition, we may identify certain pre-acquisition
contingencies. If, during the purchase price allocation period,
we are able to determine the fair value of a pre-acquisition
contingency, we will include that amount in the purchase price
allocation. If we are unable to determine the fair value of a
pre-acquisition contingency at the end of the purchase price
allocation period, we will evaluate whether to include an amount
in the purchase price allocation based on whether it is probable
a liability had been incurred and whether an amount can be
reasonably estimated. After the end of the purchase price
allocation period, any adjustment to amounts recorded for a
pre-acquisition contingency will be included in our operating
results in the period in which the adjustment is determined.
Goodwill, Intangible and Other Long-Lived Assets and
Impairment Assessments. We have significant
long-lived tangible and intangible assets, including goodwill
and intangible assets with indefinite lives, which are
susceptible to valuation adjustments as a result of changes in
various factors or conditions. The most significant finite-lived
tangible and intangible assets are customer relationships,
licensed technology, patents and core technology, completed
technology, fixed assets and tradenames. All finite-lived
intangible assets are amortized based upon patterns in which the
economic benefits are expected to be utilized. The values of
intangible assets determined in connection with a business
combination, with the exception of goodwill, were initially
determined by a risk-adjusted, discounted cash flow approach. We
assess the potential impairment of intangible and fixed assets
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying values may not be recoverable. Goodwill and
indefinite-lived intangible assets are assessed for potential
impairment at least annually, but also whenever events or
changes in circumstances indicate the carrying values may not be
recoverable. Factors we consider important, which could trigger
an impairment of such assets, include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
significant underperformance relative to historical or projected
future operating results;
|
|
|
|
significant changes in the manner of or use of the acquired
assets or the strategy for our overall business;
|
|
|
|
significant negative industry or economic trends;
|
|
|
|
significant decline in our stock price for a sustained
period; and
|
|
|
|
a decline in our market capitalization below net book value.
|
Future adverse changes in these or other unforeseeable factors
could result in an impairment charge that would materially
impact future results of operations and financial position in
the reporting period identified.
We test goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives for
impairment annually in the fourth quarter, and between annual
tests if indicators of potential impairment exist. The
impairment test for goodwill and intangible assets with
indefinite lives compares the fair value of identified reporting
unit(s) to its (their) carrying amount to assess whether such
assets are impaired. We have three reporting units based on the
level of information provided to, and review thereof, by our
core market management. In certain instances we have aggregated
components of an operating segment into a single reporting unit
based on similar economic characteristics. The estimated fair
values of the reporting units for the annual goodwill impairment
test were determined based on estimates of those reporting
units enterprise values as if they were standalone
operations as a function of trailing-twelve-month
(TTM) revenues and adjusted earnings before
interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization
(EBITDA) as compared to companies comparable to each
of the reporting units on a standalone basis. The carrying
values of the reporting units were determined based on an
allocation of our assets and liabilities through specific
allocation of certain assets and liabilities, including
goodwill, to the reporting units and an apportionment method
based on relative size of the reporting units revenues and
operating expenses compared to the Company as a whole. Certain
corporate assets that are not instrumental to the reporting
units operations and would not be transferred to
hypothetical purchasers of the reporting units were excluded
from the reporting units carrying values. Key estimates
and judgments inherent to the analysis were the determination of
TTM revenue and EBITDA multiples used in estimating the fair
values of the reporting units and the allocation methods used to
determine the carrying values of the reporting units. Intangible
assets with indefinite lives are not amortized, but are required
to be evaluated periodically to ensure that their current fair
value exceeds the stated book value. Based on our assessments,
we have not had any impairment charges during our history as a
result of our impairment evaluation of goodwill and other
indefinite-lived intangible assets. Significant adverse changes
in our future revenues
and/or
adjusted EBITDA results, or significant degradation in the
enterprise values of comparable companies within our core
markets, could result in the determination that all or
44
a portion of our goodwill is impaired. However, as of our fiscal
2010 annual impairment assessment date, our estimated fair
values of our reporting units significantly exceeded their
carrying values.
We periodically review long-lived assets other than goodwill or
indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment whenever
events or changes in business circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount of the assets may not be fully recoverable or
that the useful lives of those assets are no longer appropriate.
Each impairment test is based on a comparison of the
undiscounted cash flows to the recorded carrying value for the
asset or asset group. Asset groups utilized in this analysis are
identified as the lowest level grouping of assets for which
largely independent cash flows can be identified. If impairment
is indicated, the asset or asset group is written down to its
estimated fair value.
Significant judgments and estimates are involved in determining
the useful lives of our long-lived assets, determining the
reporting units and assessing when events or circumstances would
require an interim impairment analysis of goodwill or other
long-lived assets to be performed. Changes in our organization
or management reporting structure, as well as other events and
circumstances, including but not limited to technological
advances, increased competition and changing economic or market
conditions, could result in (a) shorter estimated useful
lives, (b) changes to reporting units, which may require
alternative methods of estimating fair values or greater
disaggregation or aggregation in our analysis by reporting unit,
and/or
(c) other changes in previous assumptions or estimates. In
turn, this could have a significant impact on our consolidated
financial statements through accelerated amortization
and/or
impairment charges.
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. We
account for share-based awards to employees and directors,
including grants of employee stock options, purchases under
employee stock purchase plans, awards in the form of restricted
shares (Restricted Stock) and awards in the form of
units of stock purchase rights (Restricted Units)
through recognition of the fair value of the share-based awards
as a charge against earnings in the form of stock-based
compensation expense. We recognize stock-based compensation
expense over the requisite service period, net of estimated
forfeitures. We will recognize a benefit from stock-based
compensation in equity using the with-and-without approach for
the utilization of tax attributes. The Restricted Stock and
Restricted Units are collectively referred to as
Restricted Awards. Determining the fair value of
share-based awards at the grant date requires judgment,
including estimating expected dividends, share price volatility
and the amount of share-based awards that are expected to be
forfeited. If actual results differ significantly from these
estimates, stock-based compensation expense and our results of
operations could be materially impacted.
Income Taxes. Deferred tax assets and
liabilities are determined based on differences between the
financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities
using enacted tax rates in effect in the years in which the
differences are expected to reverse. We do not provide for
U.S. income taxes on the undistributed earnings of its
foreign subsidiaries, which we consider to be indefinitely
reinvested outside of the U.S.
We make judgments regarding the realizability of our deferred
tax assets. The balance sheet carrying value of our net deferred
tax assets is based on whether we believe that it is more likely
than not that we will generate sufficient future taxable income
to realize these deferred tax assets after consideration of all
available evidence. We regularly review our deferred tax assets
for recoverability considering historical profitability,
projected future taxable income, and the expected timing of the
reversals of existing temporary differences and tax planning
strategies.
Valuation allowances have been established for
U.S. deferred tax assets, which we believe do not meet the
more likely than not criteria for recognition. If we
are subsequently able to utilize all or a portion of the
deferred tax assets for which a valuation allowance has been
established, then we may be required to recognize these deferred
tax assets through the reduction of the valuation allowance
which could result in a material benefit to our results of
operations in the period in which the benefit is determined,
excluding the recognition of the portion of the valuation
allowance which relates to net deferred tax assets created as a
result of share-based payments or other equity transactions
where prevailing guidance requires the change in valuation
allowance to be traced forward. The recognition of the portion
of the valuation allowance which relates to net deferred tax
assets resulting from share-based payments or other qualifying
equity transactions will be recorded as additional
paid-in-capital.
We establish reserves for tax uncertainties that reflect the use
of the comprehensive model for the recognition and measurement
of uncertain tax positions. Under the comprehensive model, when
the minimum threshold for
45
recognition is not met, a tax position is recorded as the
largest amount that is more than fifty percent likely of being
realized upon ultimate settlement.
Loss Contingencies. We are subject to legal
proceedings, lawsuits and other claims relating to labor,
service and other matters arising in the ordinary course of
business, as discussed in Note 18 of Notes to our
Consolidated Financial Statements. Quarterly, we review the
status of each significant matter and assess our potential
financial exposure. If the potential loss from any claim or
legal proceeding is considered probable and the amount can be
reasonably estimated, we accrue a liability for the estimated
loss. Significant judgment is required in both the determination
of probability and the determination as to whether an exposure
is reasonably estimable. Because of uncertainties related to
these matters, accruals are based only on the best information
available at the time. As additional information becomes
available, we reassess the potential liability related to our
pending claims and litigation and may revise our estimates. Such
revisions in the estimates of the potential liabilities could
have a material impact on our results of operations and
financial position.
RECENTLY
ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In April 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update
(ASU)
No. 2010-17,
Revenue Recognition Milestone Method (Topic 605):
Milestone Method of Revenue Recognition. The ASU codifies
the consensus reached in Emerging Issues Task Force
(EITF) Issue
No. 08-9,
Milestone Method of Revenue Recognition. The amendments
to the FASB Accounting Standards Codification provide guidance
on defining a milestone and determining when it may be
appropriate to apply the milestone method of revenue recognition
for research or development transactions. Consideration that is
contingent on achievement of a milestone in its entirety may be
recognized as revenue in the period in which the milestone is
achieved only if the milestone is judged to meet certain
criteria to be considered substantive. The amendments in the ASU
are effective on a prospective basis for milestones achieved in
fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning
on or after June 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted. If
an entity elects early adoption and the period of adoption is
not the beginning of the entitys fiscal year, the entity
must apply the amendments retrospectively from the beginning of
the year of adoption. Entities may also elect to adopt the
amendments in the ASU retrospectively for all prior periods. We
do not expect the implementation of ASU No
2010-17 to
have a material impact on our financial statements.
In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update
No. 2010-06,
Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements (Topic
820) Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures
(ASU
2010-06)
which requires additional disclosures about the different
classes of assets and liabilities measured at fair value, the
valuation techniques and inputs used, the activity in
Level 3 fair value measurements, and transfers between
Levels 1, 2, and 3. Levels 1, 2 and 3 of fair value
measurements are defined in Note 12 of Notes to our
consolidated Financial Statements. ASU
2010-06 was
effective for us for the interim reporting period beginning
January 1, 2010, except for the provisions related to
activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. Those
provisions are effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those
fiscal years. ASU
2010-06
impacts disclosure only and therefore, did not, and is not
expected to, have a material impact on our financial statements.
In September 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
amended the Accounting Standards Codification as summarized in
ASU 2009-14,
Software (Topic 985): Certain Revenue Arrangements That
Include Software Elements, and ASU
2009-13,
Revenue Recognition (Topic 605): Multiple-Deliverable Revenue
Arrangements. As summarized in ASU
2009-14, ASC
Topic 985 has been amended to remove from the scope of industry
specific revenue accounting guidance for software and software
related transactions, tangible products containing software
components and non-software components that function together to
deliver the products essential functionality. As
summarized in ASU
2009-13, ASC
Topic 605 has been amended (1) to provide updated guidance
on whether multiple deliverables exist, how the deliverables in
an arrangement should be separated, and the consideration
allocated; (2) to require an entity to allocate revenue in
an arrangement using estimated selling prices of deliverables if
a vendor does not have vendor-specific objective evidence
(or third-party evidence of selling price; and (3) to
eliminate the use of the residual method and require an entity
to allocate revenue using the relative selling price method. The
accounting changes summarized in ASU
2009-14 and
ASU 2009-13
are both effective for fiscal years beginning on or after
June 15, 2010. We are continuing to evaluate the potential
impact of these changes.
46
|
|
Item 7A.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
We are exposed to market risk from changes in foreign currency
exchange rates, interest rates and equity prices which could
affect operating results, financial position and cash flows. We
manage our exposure to these market risks through our regular
operating and financing activities and, when appropriate,
through the use of derivative financial instruments.
Exchange
Rate Sensitivity
We are exposed to changes in foreign currency exchange rates.
Any foreign currency transaction, defined as a transaction
denominated in a currency other than the U.S. dollar, will
be reported in U.S. dollars at the applicable exchange
rate. Assets and liabilities are translated into
U.S. dollars at exchange rates in effect at the balance
sheet date and income and expense items are translated at
average rates for the period. The primary foreign currency
denominated transactions include revenue and expenses and the
resulting accounts receivable and accounts payable balances
reflected on our balance sheet. Therefore, the change in the
value of the U.S. dollar compared to foreign currencies
will have either a positive or negative effect on our financial
position and results of operations. Historically, our primary
exposure has related to transactions denominated in the Euro,
British Pound, Canadian Dollar, Japanese Yen, Indian Rupee and
Hungarian Forint.
A hypothetical change of 10% in appreciation or depreciation in
foreign currency exchange rates from the quoted foreign currency
exchange rates at September 30, 2010 would not have a
material impact on our revenue, operating results or cash flows
in the coming year.
Periodically, we enter into forward exchange contracts to hedge
against foreign currency fluctuations. These contracts may or
may not be designated as cash flow hedges for accounting
purposes. At September 30, 2010, we have foreign currency
contracts with a total notional value of approximately
$18.3 million designated as cash flow hedges. These
contracts all mature within the next twelve months. The notional
contract amount of outstanding foreign currency exchange
contracts not designated as cash flow hedges was
Euro 18.0 million at September 30, 2010. During
fiscal 2010 and 2009, we recorded foreign exchange gains of
$3.5 million and $7.0 million, respectively. Based on
the nature of the transaction for which the contracts were
purchased, a hypothetical change of 10% in exchange rates would
not have a material impact on our financial results.
Interest
Rate Sensitivity
We are exposed to interest rate risk as a result of our
significant cash and cash equivalents, and the outstanding debt
under the Credit Facility.
At September 30, 2010, we held approximately
$516.6 million of cash and cash equivalents primarily
consisting of cash and money-market funds. Due to the low
current market yields and the short-term nature of our
investments, a hypothetical change in market rates of one
percentage point would not have a material effect on the fair
value of our portfolio or results of operations.
At September 30, 2010, our total outstanding debt balance
exposed to variable interest rates was $643.6 million. To
partially offset this variable interest rate exposure, we use
interest rate swaps to convert specific variable-rate debt into
fixed-rate debt. As of September 30, 2010, we have two
outstanding interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges
with an aggregate notional amount of $200.0 million. The
interest rates on these swaps are 2.7% and 2.1%, plus the
applicable margin for the Credit Facility, and they expire in
October 2010 and November 2010, respectively. As of
September 30, 2010 and 2009, the aggregate cumulative
unrealized gains (losses) related to these derivatives were
$3.5 million and $(4.0) million, respectively. A
hypothetical change in market rates would have a significant
impact on interest expense and amounts payable. Assuming a one
percentage point increase in interest rates, our interest
expense relative to our outstanding debt would increase
$6.2 million per annum.
Equity
Price Risk
We are exposed to equity price risk as a result of security
price guarantees that we enter in to from time to time.
Generally, these price guarantees are for a period of six months
or less, and require payment from either us to a third party, or
from the third party to us, based upon changes in our stock
price during the contract term. As of September 30, 2010,
we have security price guarantees outstanding for approximately
3.7 million shares of our
47
common stock. A 10% change in our stock price during the next
six months would result in additional cash outflows of up to
$5.7 million for a decrease in the stock price or
additional cash inflows of up to $5.7 million for an
increase in the stock price during fiscal 2011.
|
|
Item 8.
|
Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data
|
Nuance
Communications, Inc. Consolidated Financial Statements
48
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
INDEX TO
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
49
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors and Stockholders
Nuance Communications, Inc.
Burlington, Massachusetts
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Nuance Communications, Inc. as of September 30, 2010 and
2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders equity and comprehensive loss, and cash flows
for each of the three years in the period ended
September 30, 2010. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles
used and significant estimates made by management, as well as
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We
believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of Nuance Communications, Inc. at September 30,
2010 and 2009, and the results of its operations and its cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended
September 30, 2010, in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial
statements, effective October 1, 2009 the Company
retrospectively adopted ASC Topic
470-20,
Debt with Conversion and other features as it
related to the convertible debt. The Company also prospectively
adopted ASC Topic 805 as it relates to business combinations.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States),
Nuance Communications, Inc.s internal control over
financial reporting as of September 30, 2010, based on
criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations (COSO), and our report dated November 29,
2010 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
BDO USA, LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
November 29, 2010
50
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors and Shareholders
Nuance Communications, Inc.
Burlington, Massachusetts
We have audited Nuance Communication Inc.s internal
control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2010,
based on criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria).
Nuance Communications, Inc.s management is responsible for
maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting
and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting, included in the accompanying
Item 9A, Managements Report on Internal Control Over
Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion
on the Companys internal control over financial reporting
based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk
that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on
the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We
believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
As indicated in the accompanying Item 9A, Managements
Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting,
managements assessment of and conclusion on the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting did
not include the internal controls of Spinvox Limited, which was
acquired on December 30, 2009, and which is included in the
consolidated balance sheets of Nuance Communications, Inc. as of
September 30, 2010, and the related consolidated statements
of operations, stockholders equity and comprehensive loss,
and cash flows for the year then ended. Spinvox Limited
constituted 0.6% of consolidated assets as of September 30,
2010, and 2.2% of revenues for the year then ended. Management
did not assess the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting of Spinvox Limited because of the timing of
the acquisition which was completed on December 30, 2009.
Our audit of internal control over financial reporting of Nuance
Communications, Inc. also did not include an evaluation of the
internal control over financial reporting of Spinvox.
In our opinion, Nuance Communications, Inc. maintained, in all
material respects, effective internal control over financial
reporting as of September 30, 2010, based on the COSO
criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
consolidated balance sheets of Nuance Communications, Inc. as of
September 30, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders equity and
comprehensive loss, and cash flows for each of the three years
in the period ended September 30, 2010 and our report dated
November 29, 2010 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
BDO USA, LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
November 29, 2010
51
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product and licensing
|
|
$
|
473,460
|
|
|
$
|
373,367
|
|
|
$
|
414,360
|
|
Professional services and hosting
|
|
|
463,567
|
|
|
|
411,363
|
|
|
|
305,540
|
|
Maintenance and support
|
|
|
181,921
|
|
|
|
165,622
|
|
|
|
148,562
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
1,118,948
|
|
|
|
950,352
|
|
|
|
868,462
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product and licensing
|
|
|
49,618
|
|
|
|
37,255
|
|
|
|
45,746
|
|
Professional services and hosting
|
|
|
280,725
|
|
|
|
254,777
|
|
|
|
214,031
|
|
Maintenance and support
|
|
|
31,269
|
|
|
|
29,129
|
|
|
|
31,477
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
47,758
|
|
|
|
38,390
|
|
|
|
24,389
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenues
|
|
|
409,370
|
|
|
|
359,551
|
|
|
|
315,643
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
709,578
|
|
|
|
590,801
|
|
|
|
552,819
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
152,071
|
|
|
|
116,774
|
|
|
|
112,788
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
266,208
|
|
|
|
217,773
|
|
|
|
227,661
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
122,061
|
|
|
|
100,478
|
|
|
|
98,356
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
87,819
|
|
|
|
76,978
|
|
|
|
58,245
|
|
In-process research and development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,601
|
|
Acquisition-related costs, net
|
|
|
30,611
|
|
|
|
15,703
|
|
|
|
13,335
|
|
Restructuring and other charges (credits), net
|
|
|
17,891
|
|
|
|
5,520
|
|
|
|
7,219
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
676,661
|
|
|
|
533,226
|
|
|
|
520,205
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
32,917
|
|
|
|
57,575
|
|
|
|
32,614
|
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
1,238
|
|
|
|
3,562
|
|
|
|
8,032
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(40,993
|
)
|
|
|
(47,288
|
)
|
|
|
(62,088
|
)
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
5,773
|
|
|
|
7,155
|
|
|
|
(964
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes
|
|
|
(1,065
|
)
|
|
|
21,004
|
|
|
|
(22,406
|
)
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
18,034
|
|
|
|
40,391
|
|
|
|
14,554
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(19,099
|
)
|
|
$
|
(19,387
|
)
|
|
$
|
(36,960
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.08
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.18
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.08
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.18
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
287,412
|
|
|
|
253,644
|
|
|
|
209,801
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
287,412
|
|
|
|
253,644
|
|
|
|
209,801
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes. Financial statements as of
September 30, 2009 and for the years ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008 have been adjusted for the
retrospective application of FASB
ASC 470-20
(see Note 2).
52
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except
|
|
|
|
per share amounts)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
516,630
|
|
|
$
|
527,038
|
|
Restricted cash (Note 9)
|
|
|
24,503
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable securities
|
|
|
5,044
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, less allowances for doubtful accounts of
$6,301 and $6,833
|
|
|
217,587
|
|
|
|
199,548
|
|
Acquired unbilled accounts receivable
|
|
|
7,412
|
|
|
|
9,171
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
70,466
|
|
|
|
60,070
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
841,642
|
|
|
|
795,827
|
|
Land, building and equipment, net
|
|
|
62,083
|
|
|
|
53,468
|
|
Marketable securities
|
|
|
28,322
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
2,077,943
|
|
|
|
1,891,003
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
685,865
|
|
|
|
706,805
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
73,844
|
|
|
|
52,361
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
3,769,699
|
|
|
$
|
3,499,464
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt and capital leases
|
|
$
|
7,764
|
|
|
$
|
6,862
|
|
Contingent and deferred acquisition payments
|
|
|
2,131
|
|
|
|
91,431
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
78,616
|
|
|
|
59,574
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
151,621
|
|
|
|
116,963
|
|
Deferred maintenance revenue
|
|
|
90,969
|
|
|
|
84,607
|
|
Unearned revenue and customer deposits
|
|
|
51,371
|
|
|
|
59,788
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
382,472
|
|
|
|
419,225
|
|
Long-term portion of debt and capital leases
|
|
|
851,014
|
|
|
|
848,898
|
|
Deferred revenue, net of current portion
|
|
|
76,598
|
|
|
|
33,904
|
|
Deferred tax liability
|
|
|
63,731
|
|
|
|
56,346
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
98,688
|
|
|
|
98,090
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
1,472,503
|
|
|
|
1,456,463
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 3, 5, and 18)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series B preferred stock, $0.001 par value;
15,000 shares authorized; 3,562 shares issued and
outstanding (liquidation preference $4,631)
|
|
|
4,631
|
|
|
|
4,631
|
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 560,000 shares
authorized; 301,623 and 280,647 shares issued and 297,950
and 276,935 shares outstanding
|
|
|
302
|
|
|
|
281
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
2,581,901
|
|
|
|
2,308,992
|
|
Treasury stock, at cost (3,673 and 3,712 shares)
|
|
|
(16,788
|
)
|
|
|
(16,214
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
8,505
|
|
|
|
7,567
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(281,355
|
)
|
|
|
(262,256
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
2,297,196
|
|
|
|
2,043,001
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
3,769,699
|
|
|
$
|
3,499,464
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes. Financial statements as of
September 30, 2009 and for the years ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008 have been adjusted for the
retrospective application of FASB
ASC 470-20
(see Note 2).
53
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Paid-In
|
|
|
Treasury Stock
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Stockholders
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Balance at October 1, 2007
|
|
|
3,562
|
|
|
$
|
4,631
|
|
|
|
196,368
|
|
|
$
|
196
|
|
|
$
|
1,132,501
|
|
|
|
3,190
|
|
|
$
|
(15,418
|
)
|
|
$
|
14,979
|
|
|
$
|
(204,982
|
)
|
|
$
|
931,907
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock under employee stock-based compensation
plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,513
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
28,424
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,431
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of restricted stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,316
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancellation of restricted stock, and repurchase of common stock
at cost for employee tax withholding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(911
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(17,007
|
)
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
(652
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,660
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,631
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,631
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess tax benefit from share-based payment plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock in connection with equity offerings,
net of expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,158
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
330,398
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
330,417
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock in connection with business and asset
acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,383
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
132,245
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
132,251
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock to escrow agent in connection with
acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,765
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested options for the purchase of common stock, assumed in
connection with acquisitions Repurchase of shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,606
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,606
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of adoption of FIN 48 Issuance of common
stock in connection with exercise of warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(927
|
)
|
|
|
(927
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36,960
|
)
|
|
|
(36,960
|
)
|
|
$
|
(36,960
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized losses on cash flow hedge derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,291
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,291
|
|
|
|
3,291
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized losses on pensions Adjustment to initially apply
SFAS 158, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,581
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,581
|
)
|
|
|
(5,581
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(39,200
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2008
|
|
|
3,562
|
|
|
|
4,631
|
|
|
|
232,592
|
|
|
|
232
|
|
|
|
1,712,993
|
|
|
|
3,222
|
|
|
|
(16,070
|
)
|
|
|
12,739
|
|
|
|
(242,869
|
)
|
|
|
1,471,656
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock under employee stock-based compensation
plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,722
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
19,832
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,837
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of restricted stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,945
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancellation of restricted stock, and repurchase of common stock
at cost for employee tax withholding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(886
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(10,401
|
)
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
(143
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,545
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,407
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,407
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess tax benefit from share-based payment plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
733
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
733
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock in connection with financing, net of
expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,396
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
175,029
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
175,046
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock in connection with warrant exercises,
net of issuance costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,575
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
20,520
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,525
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock in connection with business and asset
acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,196
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
268,669
|
|
|
|
475
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
268,687
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock to escrow agent in connection with
acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,107
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested options for the purchase of common stock, assumed in
connection with acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,523
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,523
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments for escrow, make-whole and earn-out settlements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,691
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,691
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,387
|
)
|
|
|
(19,387
|
)
|
|
$
|
(19,387
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains on cash flow hedge derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,103
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,103
|
)
|
|
|
(3,103
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
729
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
729
|
|
|
|
729
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized losses on pensions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,798
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,798
|
)
|
|
|
(2,798
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(24,559
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2009
|
|
|
3,562
|
|
|
|
4,631
|
|
|
|
280,647
|
|
|
|
281
|
|
|
|
2,308,992
|
|
|
|
3,712
|
|
|
|
(16,214
|
)
|
|
|
7,567
|
|
|
|
(262,256
|
)
|
|
|
2,043,001
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock under employee stock-based compensation
plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,402
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
29,506
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,510
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of restricted stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,737
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancellation of restricted stock, and repurchase of common stock
at cost for employee tax withholding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,635
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(25,973
|
)
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
(574
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,549
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,139
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,139
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess tax benefit from share-based payment plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,060
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,060
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock in connection with warrant exercises,
net of issuance costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,509
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
12,347
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,350
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock in connection with business and asset
acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,369
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
145,627
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145,636
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments for escrow, make-whole and earn-out settlements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
594
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
10,209
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,210
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,099
|
)
|
|
|
(19,099
|
)
|
|
$
|
(19,099
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains on cash flow hedge derivatives and investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,208
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,208
|
|
|
|
4,208
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain on marketable securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,807
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,807
|
)
|
|
|
(2,807
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized losses on pensions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(493
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(493
|
)
|
|
|
(493
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(18,161
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2010
|
|
|
3,562
|
|
|
$
|
4,631
|
|
|
|
301,623
|
|
|
$
|
302
|
|
|
$
|
2,581,901
|
|
|
|
3,673
|
|
|
$
|
(16,788
|
)
|
|
$
|
8,505
|
|
|
$
|
(281,355
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,297,196
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes. Financial statements as of
September 30, 2009 and for the years ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008 have been adjusted for the
retrospective application of FASB
ASC 470-20
(see Note 2).
54
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(19,099
|
)
|
|
$
|
(19,387
|
)
|
|
$
|
(36,960
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation of property and equipment
|
|
|
21,579
|
|
|
|
18,691
|
|
|
|
16,366
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
135,577
|
|
|
|
115,368
|
|
|
|
82,634
|
|
Non-cash interest expense
|
|
|
12,955
|
|
|
|
12,492
|
|
|
|
12,100
|
|
Non-cash restructuring expense
|
|
|
6,833
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In-process research and development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,601
|
|
Bad debt provision
|
|
|
873
|
|
|
|
1,823
|
|
|
|
4,173
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
100,139
|
|
|
|
71,407
|
|
|
|
68,631
|
|
Gain on foreign currency forward contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,049
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax provision
|
|
|
3,742
|
|
|
|
25,718
|
|
|
|
491
|
|
Other
|
|
|
703
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
1,799
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects from
acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(773
|
)
|
|
|
33,481
|
|
|
|
62,034
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
(3,840
|
)
|
|
|
(14,027
|
)
|
|
|
(1,421
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
4,710
|
|
|
|
26,582
|
|
|
|
(11,946
|
)
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
|
|
(6,760
|
)
|
|
|
(5,007
|
)
|
|
|
(14,251
|
)
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
39,643
|
|
|
|
(546
|
)
|
|
|
9,948
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
296,282
|
|
|
|
258,689
|
|
|
|
196,199
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(25,974
|
)
|
|
|
(19,512
|
)
|
|
|
(17,716
|
)
|
Payments for acquisitions, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(203,729
|
)
|
|
|
(99,120
|
)
|
|
|
(392,527
|
)
|
Payment for equity investments
|
|
|
(14,970
|
)
|
|
|
(159
|
)
|
|
|
(2,172
|
)
|
Purchases of marketable securities
|
|
|
(33,529
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from maturities of marketable securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
2,577
|
|
Payments for acquired technology and capitalized patent costs
|
|
|
(15,300
|
)
|
|
|
(65,875
|
)
|
|
|
(36,479
|
)
|
Change in restricted cash balances
|
|
|
(22,070
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(315,572
|
)
|
|
|
(184,610
|
)
|
|
|
(446,079
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments of debt and capital leases
|
|
|
(8,460
|
)
|
|
|
(6,999
|
)
|
|
|
(7,771
|
)
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs
|
|
|
12,350
|
|
|
|
195,571
|
|
|
|
330,603
|
|
Purchase of treasury stock
|
|
|
(574
|
)
|
|
|
(144
|
)
|
|
|
(652
|
)
|
Payments on other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
(9,870
|
)
|
|
|
(9,180
|
)
|
|
|
(11,379
|
)
|
Proceeds from settlement of share-based derivatives
|
|
|
7,306
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess tax benefits from share-based awards
|
|
|
1,060
|
|
|
|
733
|
|
|
|
5,200
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock from employee stock
options and purchase plan
|
|
|
29,510
|
|
|
|
19,837
|
|
|
|
28,140
|
|
Cash used to net share settle employee equity awards
|
|
|
(21,442
|
)
|
|
|
(10,402
|
)
|
|
|
(17,002
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
9,880
|
|
|
|
189,416
|
|
|
|
327,139
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effects of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(998
|
)
|
|
|
2,003
|
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(10,408
|
)
|
|
|
265,498
|
|
|
|
77,205
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
|
|
527,038
|
|
|
|
261,540
|
|
|
|
184,335
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
|
|
$
|
516,630
|
|
|
$
|
527,038
|
|
|
$
|
261,540
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes. Financial statements as of
September 30, 2009 and for the years ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008 have been adjusted for the
retrospective application of FASB
ASC 470-20
(see Note 2).
55
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
|
|
1.
|
Organization
and Presentation
|
Nuance Communications, Inc. (we, Nuance,
or the Company) is a leading provider of voice and
language solutions for businesses and consumers around the
world. Our technologies, applications and services make the user
experience more compelling by transforming the way people
interact with devices and systems. Our solutions are used for
tasks and services such as requesting information from a
phone-based self-service solution, dictating medical records,
searching the mobile Web by voice, entering a destination into a
navigation system, or working with PDF documents. Our solutions
help make these interactions, tasks and experiences more
productive, compelling and efficient.
We leverage our global professional services organization and
our extensive network of partners to design and deploy
innovative solutions for businesses and organizations around the
globe. We market and sell our products directly through a
dedicated sales force and through our
e-commerce
website and also through a global network of resellers,
including system integrators, independent software vendors,
value-added resellers, hardware vendors, telecommunications
carriers and distributors.
We have built a portfolio of intellectual property,
technologies, applications and solutions through both internal
development and acquisitions. We expect to continue to pursue
opportunities to expand our assets, geographic presence,
distribution network and customer base through acquisitions of
other businesses and technologies. Significant business
acquisitions during fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
December 30, 2009 SpinVox, Limited
(SpinVox)
|
|
|
|
October 1, 2008 SNAPin, Inc.
(SNAPin)
|
|
|
|
September 26, 2008 Philips Speech Recognition
Systems GMBH, a business unit of Royal Philips Electronics
(PSRS);
|
|
|
|
May 20, 2008 eScription, Inc.
(eScription);
|
|
|
|
November 26, 2007 Viecore, Inc.
(Viecore);
|
The results of operations from the acquired businesses have been
included in our consolidated financial statements from their
respective acquisition dates. See Note 3 for additional
disclosure related to each of these acquisitions.
|
|
2.
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
|
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and the disclosure
of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the
financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and
expenses during the reporting period. On an ongoing basis, we
evaluate our estimates, assumptions and judgments. The most
important of these relate to revenue recognition; the allowances
for doubtful accounts and sales returns; accounting for patent
legal defense costs; the valuation of goodwill, intangible
assets and tangible long-lived assets; accounting for business
combinations; accounting for stock-based compensation;
accounting for long-term facility obligations; the accounting
for derivative instruments; accounting for income taxes and
related valuation allowances; and loss contingencies. We base
our estimates on historical experience, market participant fair
value considerations and various other factors that are believed
to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual amounts could
differ significantly from these estimates.
56
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Basis
of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include our accounts and
those of our wholly-owned domestic and foreign subsidiaries.
Intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.
Reclassification
We reclassified certain acquisition-related costs included
within operating expenses for the years ended September 30,
2009 and 2008 to conform to our revised statement of operations
presentation for such costs as disclosed below. The current and
long-term portions of our accrued business combination costs
have been included in the accrued expenses and other current
liabilities and other liabilities line items where as previously
they were presented as separate line items. Inventory has been
included in the prepaid expenses and other current assets line
item where as previously it was presented as a separate line
item. Such reclassifications have no impact on earnings or cash
flows provided by operations.
Revenue
Recognition
We derive revenue from the following sources: (1) software
license agreements, including royalty and other usage-based
arrangements, (2) post-contract customer support,
(3) fixed and variable fee hosting arrangements and
(4) professional services. Our revenue recognition policies
for these revenue streams are discussed below.
The sale
and/or
license of software products and technology is deemed to have
occurred when a customer either has taken possession of the
related software or technology or has access to take immediate
possession of the software or technology. In select situations,
we sell or license intellectual property in conjunction with, or
in place of, embedding our intellectual property in software. We
recognize revenue from the sale or license of software products
and licensing of technology when (i) persuasive evidence of
an arrangement exists, (ii) delivery has occurred,
(iii) the fee is fixed or determinable and
(iv) collectibility is probable. Vendor-specific objective
evidence (VSOE) of fair value for software and
software-related services exists when a company can support what
the fair value of its software
and/or
software-related services is based on evidence of the prices
charged when the same elements are sold separately. VSOE of fair
value is required, generally, in order to separate the
accounting for various elements in a software and related
services arrangement. We have established VSOE of fair value for
the majority of our post-contract customer support
(PCS), professional services, and training.
Revenue from royalties on sales of our software products by
original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), where no
services are included, is recognized in the quarter earned so
long as we have been notified by the OEM that such royalties are
due, and provided that all other revenue recognition criteria
are met.
Software arrangements generally include PCS, which includes
telephone support and the right to receive unspecified
upgrades/enhancements on a
when-and-if-available
basis, typically for one to five years. Revenue from PCS is
generally recognized ratably on a straight-line basis over the
term that the maintenance service is provided.
Non-software revenue, such as arrangements containing hosting
services where the customer does not take possession of the
software at the outset of the arrangement and has no contractual
right to do so, is recognized when (i) persuasive evidence
of an arrangement exists, (ii) delivery has occurred or
services have been rendered, (iii) the fees are fixed or
determinable and (iv) collectibility is reasonably assured.
For revenue arrangements with multiple elements that are not
considered to be software or software-related, we allocate an
arrangements fees into separate units of accounting based
on fair value. We generally support fair value of our
deliverables based upon the prices we charge when we sell
similar elements separately.
Revenue from products offered on a subscription
and/or
hosted, on-demand basis is recognized in the period the services
are provided, based on a fixed minimum fee
and/or
variable fees based on the volume of activity. Variable
subscription and hosting revenue is recognized as we are
notified by the customer or through management reports that such
revenue is due, provided that all other revenue recognition
criteria are met.
57
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Set-up fees
from arrangements containing hosting services, as well as the
associated direct and incremental costs, are deferred and
recognized ratably over the longer of the contract lives, or the
expected lives of the customer relationships.
When we provide professional services considered essential to
the functionality of the software, we recognize revenue from the
professional services as well as any related software licenses
on a
percentage-of-completion
basis whereby the arrangement consideration is recognized as the
services are performed, as measured by an observable input. In
these circumstances, we separate license revenue from
professional service revenue for income statement presentation
by allocating VSOE of fair value of the professional services as
professional service revenue and the residual portion as license
revenue. We generally determine the
percentage-of-completion
by comparing the labor hours incurred to-date to the estimated
total labor hours required to complete the project. We consider
labor hours to be the most reliable, available measure of
progress on these projects. Adjustments to estimates to complete
are made in the periods in which facts resulting in a change
become known. When the estimate indicates that a loss will be
incurred, such loss is recorded in the period identified.
Significant judgments and estimates are involved in determining
the percent complete of each contract. Different assumptions
could yield materially different results.
When products are sold through distributors or resellers, title
and risk of loss generally passes upon shipment, at which time
the transaction is invoiced and payment is due. Shipments to
distributors and resellers without right of return are
recognized as revenue upon shipment, provided all other revenue
recognition criteria are met. Certain distributors and
value-added resellers have been granted rights of return for as
long as the distributors or resellers hold the inventory. We
cannot use historical returns from these distributors and
resellers as a basis upon which to estimate future sales
returns. As a result, we recognize revenue from sales to these
distributors and resellers when the products are sold through to
retailers and end-users.
When products are sold directly to retailers or end-users, we
make an estimate of sales returns based on historical
experience. The provision for these estimated returns is
recorded as a reduction of revenue and accounts receivable at
the time that the related revenue is recorded. If actual returns
differ significantly from our estimates, such differences could
have a material impact on our results of operations for the
period in which the actual returns become known.
When maintenance and support contracts renew automatically, we
provide a reserve based on historical experience for contracts
expected to be cancelled for non-payment. All known and
estimated cancellations are recorded as a reduction to revenue
and accounts receivable.
We record consideration given to a reseller as a reduction of
revenue to the extent we have recorded cumulative revenue from
the customer or reseller. However, when we receive an
identifiable benefit in exchange for the consideration, and can
reasonably estimate the fair value of the benefit received, the
consideration is recorded as an operating expense.
We record reimbursements received for
out-of-pocket
expenses as revenue, with offsetting costs recorded as cost of
revenue.
Out-of-pocket
expenses generally include, but are not limited to, expenses
related to transportation, lodging and meals.
We record shipping and handling costs billed to customers as
revenue with offsetting costs recorded as cost of revenue.
Business
Combinations
We determine and allocate the purchase price of an acquired
company to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and
liabilities assumed as well as to in-process research and
development as of the business combination date. Results of
operations and cash flows of acquired companies are included in
our operating results from the date
58
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
of acquisition. The purchase price allocation process requires
us to use significant estimates and assumptions, including fair
value estimates, as of the business combination date including:
|
|
|
|
|
estimated fair values of intangible assets;
|
|
|
|
expected costs to complete any in-process research and
development projects;
|
|
|
|
estimated fair market values of legal performance commitments to
customers, assumed from the acquiree under existing contractual
obligations (classified as deferred revenue) at the date of
acquisition;
|
|
|
|
estimated fair market values of stock awards assumed from the
acquiree that are included in the purchase price;
|
|
|
|
estimated fair market value of required payment under contingent
consideration provisions;
|
|
|
|
estimated income tax assets and liabilities assumed from the
acquiree; and
|
|
|
|
estimated fair value of pre-acquisition contingencies assumed
from the acquiree.
|
While we use our best estimates and assumptions as a part of the
purchase price allocation process to accurately value assets
acquired and liabilities assumed at the business combination
date, our estimates and assumptions are inherently uncertain and
subject to refinement. As a result, during the purchase price
allocation period, which is generally one year from the business
combination date, we record adjustments to the assets acquired
and liabilities assumed, with the corresponding offset to
goodwill. Subsequent to the purchase price allocation period any
adjustment to assets acquired or liabilities assumed is included
in operating results in the period in which the adjustment is
determined.
Goodwill
and Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price in a
business combination over the fair value of net tangible and
intangible assets acquired. Goodwill and intangible assets with
indefinite lives are not amortized, but rather are required to
be evaluated at least annually to ensure that their current fair
value exceeds their carrying value.
The carrying amounts of these assets are reviewed for impairment
at least annually or whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying value of these assets may not be
recoverable. Our annual impairment assessment date is July 1 of
each fiscal year. Goodwill is evaluated for impairment based on
a comparison of the fair value of our reporting units to their
recorded carrying values. We have three reporting units based on
the level of information provided to, and review thereof, by our
core market management. In certain instances, we have aggregated
components of an operating segment into a single reporting unit
based on similar economic characteristics. The fair values of
the reporting units for the annual impairment assessment were
determined based on estimates of those reporting units
enterprise values as a function of trailing-twelve-month
(TTM) revenues and EBITDA as compared to companies
comparable to each of the reporting units on a standalone basis.
The carrying values of the reporting units were determined based
on an allocation of the Companys assets and liabilities
through specific allocation of certain assets and liabilities to
the reporting units and an apportionment method based on
relative size of the reporting units revenues and
operating expenses compared to the Company as a whole. Certain
corporate assets that are not instrumental to the reporting
units operations and would not be transferred to
hypothetical purchasers of the reporting units were excluded
from the reporting units carrying values. Indefinite-lived
intangibles are evaluated for impairment through comparison of
the fair value of the assets to their net book value. No
impairments of goodwill or indefinite-lived intangibles have
been recorded in fiscal 2010, 2009, or 2008.
59
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Long-Lived
Assets
Our long-lived assets consist principally of acquired intangible
assets and land, building and equipment. Land, building and
equipment are stated at cost. Building and equipment are
depreciated over their estimated useful lives. Leasehold
improvements are depreciated over the shorter of the related
lease term or the estimated useful life. Costs of significant
improvements on existing software for internal use are
capitalized and amortized over the useful life of the upgraded
software. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line
method. Repair and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred.
The cost and related accumulated depreciation of sold or retired
assets are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is
included in operations.
We include in our amortizable intangible assets those intangible
assets acquired in our business and asset acquisitions,
including certain technology that is licensed from third
parties. We amortize acquired intangible assets with finite
lives over the estimated economic lives of the assets, generally
using the straight-line method except where the pattern of the
expected economic benefit is readily identifiable, primarily
customer relationship intangibles, whereby amortization follows
that pattern. Each period, we evaluate the estimated remaining
useful life of acquired and licensed intangible assets, as well
as land, buildings and equipment, to determine whether events or
changes in circumstances warrant a revision to the remaining
period of depreciation or amortization.
We evaluate long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or
changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of an asset
or asset group may not be recoverable. We assess the
recoverability of the assets based on the undiscounted future
cash flows the assets are expected to generate and recognize an
impairment loss when estimated undiscounted future cash flows
expected to result from the use of the assets plus net proceeds
expected from disposition of the assets, if any, are less than
the carrying value of the assets. If an asset or asset group is
deemed to be impaired, the amount of the impairment loss, if
any, represents the excess of the asset or asset groups
carrying value compared to its estimated fair value.
We conducted a long-lived asset impairment analysis at the
beginning of the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010 and 2009 and
concluded that our long-lived assets were not impaired. In
fiscal 2008, we recorded impairment charges of $3.9 million
resulting from the identification of certain specific acquired
intangible assets that were no longer being utilized or
providing economic benefit, of which $0.3 million was
included in cost of revenue from amortization of intangible
assets, and $3.6 million was included in amortization of
intangible assets within operating expenses.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents consists of cash on hand, including
money market funds and commercial paper with original maturities
of 90 days or less.
Marketable
Securities and Minority Investments
Marketable Securities: Investments are
classified as
available-for-sale
and are recorded on the balance sheet at fair value with
unrealized gains or losses reported as a separate component of
accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax. Marketable
securities consist primarily of high-quality corporate debt
instruments and have maturity dates ranging from
September 22, 2011 to March 15, 2012. As of
September 30, 2010 the total cost basis was
$33.3 million.
Minority Investment: We record investments in
other companies where we do not have a controlling interest or
significant influence in the equity investment at cost within
other assets in our consolidated balance sheet.
We review our investments for impairment whenever declines in
estimated fair value are deemed to be
other-than-temporary.
60
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Accounts
Receivable Allowances
Allowances for Doubtful Accounts: We maintain
an allowance for doubtful accounts for the estimated probable
losses on uncollectible accounts receivable. The allowance is
based upon the credit worthiness of our customers, our
historical experience, the age of the receivable and current
market and economic conditions. Receivables are written off
against these allowances in the period they are determined to be
uncollectible.
Allowances for Sales Returns: We maintain an
allowance for sales returns from customers for which we have the
ability to estimate returns based on historical experience. The
returns allowance is recorded as a reduction in revenue and
accounts receivable at the time the related revenue is recorded.
Receivables are written off against the allowance in the period
the return is received.
For the years ended September 30, 2010, 2009 and 2008, the
activity related to accounts receivable allowances was as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for
|
|
|
Allowance for
|
|
|
|
Doubtful Accounts
|
|
|
Sales Returns
|
|
|
Balance at October 1, 2007
|
|
$
|
6,155
|
|
|
$
|
7,323
|
|
Bad debt provision
|
|
|
4,173
|
|
|
|
|
|
Write-offs, net of recoveries
|
|
|
(3,403
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue adjustments, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(960
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2008
|
|
|
6,925
|
|
|
|
6,363
|
|
Bad debt provision
|
|
|
1,823
|
|
|
|
|
|
Write-offs, net of recoveries
|
|
|
(1,915
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue adjustments, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(257
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2009
|
|
|
6,833
|
|
|
|
6,106
|
|
Bad debt provisions
|
|
|
873
|
|
|
|
|
|
Write-offs, net of recoveries
|
|
|
(1,405
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue adjustments, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
723
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2010
|
|
$
|
6,301
|
|
|
$
|
6,829
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost, computed using the
first-in,
first-out method, or market value and are included in other
current assets. We regularly review inventory quantities on hand
and record a provision for excess
and/or
obsolete inventory primarily based on future purchase
commitments with our suppliers, and the estimated utility of our
inventory as well as other factors including technological
changes and new product development.
Inventories, net of allowances, consisted of the following
(dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Components and parts
|
|
$
|
5,357
|
|
|
$
|
6,479
|
|
Inventory at customers
|
|
|
936
|
|
|
|
967
|
|
Finished products
|
|
|
2,308
|
|
|
|
1,079
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,601
|
|
|
$
|
8,525
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Inventory at customers reflects equipment related to in-process
installations of solutions with customers. These contracts have
not been recorded as revenue as of the balance sheet date, and
therefore the related equipment is recorded in inventory until
installation is complete.
Research
and Development Costs
Internal costs relating to research and development costs
incurred for new software products and enhancements to existing
products are expensed as incurred.
Accounting
for Collaboration Agreements
On October 9, 2009, we entered into a five-year
collaboration agreement with a third party to accelerate the
development of new speech technologies. All intellectual
property derived from the collaboration will be jointly-owned by
the two parties and Nuance will have the sole rights to
commercialize the intellectual property during the term of the
agreement. In consideration for the services from the third
party in the collaboration efforts, as well as the joint
ownership rights over intellectual property developed under the
arrangement and the exclusive right to commercialize such
developed intellectual property for the term of the arrangement,
we will pay $80.0 million in five equal payments of
$16.0 million on August 15th of each year,
payable in cash or our common stock, at our option. These
upfront payments will be recorded as a prepaid asset and
expensed ratably over each annual period, commensurate with the
pattern in which we expect the third party to perform its
services and convey our rights under the arrangement. On
October 14, 2009, we made our first payment under the
arrangement consisting of 1,047,120 shares of our common
stock valued at $16.0 million. We issued 1,024,984
additional shares of our common stock on September 28, 2010
for payment of the second $16.0 installment under this
agreement. For the year ended September 30, 2010,
$16.0 million has been recorded as research and development
expense in our consolidated statements of operations.
On January 13, 2010, we amended the collaboration agreement
discussed above to extend certain provisions for eighteen months
following the termination of the agreement. In consideration for
the extension, we agreed to pay an additional $12.0 million
to the third-party in five equal payments of $2.4 million
on August 15th of each year over the five-year
agreement term, payable in cash or our common stock, at our
option, with the exception of the first payment, which was made
during the second quarter of fiscal 2010 through the issuance of
145,897 shares of our common stock. We issued 153,747
additional shares of our common stock on September 28, 2010
for payment of the second $2.4 million installment under
this agreement. These upfront payments are recorded as a prepaid
asset when made and will be expensed ratably to sales and
marketing expense during the eighteen-month extension period.
On June 15, 2010, we entered into a five-year research
collaboration agreement with the same third party noted above to
enhance the technologies related to data analysis and fact
extraction for electronic health records. All intellectual
property resulting from the agreement will be jointly-owned by
the two parties and Nuance will have the sole rights to
commercialize the resultant intellectual property during the
term of the agreement. In consideration for the agreement, we
agreed to pay $12.5 million in five equal installments of
$2.5 million in June of each year, payable in cash or our
common stock, at our option. These periodic payments will
initially be recorded as a prepaid asset and expensed as
research and development expense ratably over each annual
period. On June 25, 2010, we made our first payment under
the arrangement consisting of 152,440 shares of our common
stock valued at $2.5 million. For the year ended
September 30, 2010, $0.8 million has been recorded as
research and development in our consolidated statements of
operations.
Software
Development Costs
Software development costs related to software that is or will
be sold or licensed externally to third-parties, or for which a
substantive plan exists to sell or license such software in the
future, incurred subsequent to the establishment of
technological feasibility, but prior to the general release of
the product, are capitalized and
62
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
amortized to cost of revenue over the estimated useful life of
the related products. We have determined that technological
feasibility is reached shortly before the general release of our
software products. Costs incurred after technological
feasibility is established have not been material, and
accordingly, we have expensed the internal costs relating to
research and development when incurred.
Capitalized
Patent Defense Costs
We monitor the anticipated outcome of legal actions, and if we
determine that the success of the defense of a patent is
probable, and so long as we believe that the future economic
benefit of the patent will be increased, we capitalize external
legal costs incurred in the defense of these patents, up to the
level of the expected increased future economic benefit. If
changes in the anticipated outcome occur, we write-off any
capitalized costs in the period the change is determined. Upon
successful defense of the patent, the amounts previously
capitalized are amortized over the remaining life of the patent.
As of September 30, 2009, we had capitalized patent defense
costs of $6.8 million included in other assets. During
fiscal 2010, these deferred costs were expensed and included in
restructuring and other charges (credits), net as a result of
unsuccessful litigation.
Acquisition-Related
Costs, net
During the first quarter of fiscal 2010, we adopted the guidance
in Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
Accounting Standards Codification (ASC 805,
Business Combinations (formerly referred to as Statement
of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 141
(revised), Business Combinations and related Staff
Positions effective October 1, 2009. ASC 805
supersedes the previous accounting guidance related to business
combinations, including the measurement of acquirer shares
issued in consideration for a business combination, the
recognition of and subsequent accounting for contingent
consideration, the recognition of acquired in-process research
and development, the accounting for acquisition-related
restructurings, the treatment of acquisition-related transaction
costs and the recognition of changes in the acquirers
income tax valuation allowance. The guidance is applied
prospectively from the date of acquisition with minor exception
related to income tax contingencies from companies acquired
prior to the adoption date. As a result of our adoption of the
new guidance, we expensed $2.2 million in
acquisition-related transaction costs which were capitalized as
of September 30, 2009. These costs were recorded as expense
within the acquisition-related costs, net line in
the consolidated statement of operations.
Acquisition-related costs include those costs related to
business and other acquisitions, including potential
acquisitions. These costs consist of transition and integration
costs, including retention payments, transitional employee costs
and earn-out payments treated as compensation expense, as well
as the costs of integration-related services provided by
third-parties; professional service fees, including direct
third-party costs of the transaction and post-acquisition legal
and other professional service fees associated with disputes and
regulatory matters related to acquired entities; and adjustments
to acquisition-related items that are required to be marked to
fair value each reporting period, such as contingent
consideration, and other items related to acquisitions for which
the measurement period has ended. Previous to our adoption of
ASC 805, certain acquisition-related costs and adjustments
now recorded as operating expenses in our consolidated
statements of operations were included as a part of the
consideration transferred and capitalized as a part of the
accounting for our business acquisitions pursuant to previous
accounting rules, primarily direct transaction costs. In
addition, there were no items under the legacy business
combination accounting guidance that were required to be
re-measured to fair value on a recurring basis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Transition and integration costs
|
|
$
|
13,562
|
|
|
$
|
4,698
|
|
|
$
|
8,295
|
|
Professional service fees
|
|
|
17,156
|
|
|
|
15,048
|
|
|
|
5,040
|
|
Acquisition-related adjustments
|
|
|
(107
|
)
|
|
|
(4,043
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
30,611
|
|
|
$
|
15,703
|
|
|
$
|
13,335
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Advertising
Costs
Advertising costs are expensed as incurred and are classified as
sales and marketing expenses. Cooperative advertising programs
reimburse customers for marketing activities for certain of our
products, subject to defined criteria. Cooperative advertising
obligations are accrued and the costs expensed at the same time
the related revenue is recognized. Cooperative advertising
expenses are recorded as expense to the extent that an
advertising benefit separate from the revenue transaction can be
identified and the cash paid does not exceed the fair value of
that advertising benefit received. Any excess of cash paid over
the fair value of the advertising benefit received is recorded
as a reduction in revenue. We incurred advertising costs of
$21.1 million, $15.8 million and $20.9 million
for fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Accounting
for Convertible Debt
Effective October 1, 2009, we adopted the provisions in
FASB
ASC 470-20
as they relate to our convertible debt instruments that may be
settled in cash upon conversion (formerly referred to as FASB
Staff Position APB
14-1,
Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments that May be
Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash
Settlement)) effective October 1, 2009. The guidance
requires us to separately account for the liability (debt) and
equity (conversion option) components of our convertible debt
instruments that require or permit settlement in cash upon
conversion in a manner that reflects our nonconvertible debt
borrowing rate at the time of issuance. The equity components of
our convertible debt instruments are recorded to
stockholders equity with an offsetting debt discount. The
debt discount created is amortized to interest expense in our
consolidated statement of operations using the effective
interest method over the expected term of the convertible debt.
The provisions herein discussed have been applied
retrospectively to all financial information presented. Refer to
information below and in Note 10 for further information.
The following table illustrates the retrospective effect of
adopting
ASC 470-20
to the consolidated statements of operations for the years ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Adjusted for
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Adjusted for
|
|
|
|
As Originally
|
|
|
Retrospective
|
|
|
As Originally
|
|
|
Retrospective
|
|
|
|
Reported
|
|
|
Application
|
|
|
Reported
|
|
|
Application
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
$
|
(40,103
|
)
|
|
$
|
(47,288
|
)
|
|
$
|
(55,196
|
)
|
|
$
|
(62,088
|
)
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
28,189
|
|
|
|
21,004
|
|
|
|
(15,514
|
)
|
|
|
(22,406
|
)
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(12,202
|
)
|
|
|
(19,387
|
)
|
|
|
(30,068
|
)
|
|
|
(36,960
|
)
|
Net loss per share Basic and Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.08
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.14
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.18
|
)
|
The following table illustrates the retrospective effect of
adopting
ASC 470-20
to the consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2009
(dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Adjusted for
|
|
|
|
As Originally
|
|
|
Retrospective
|
|
|
|
Reported
|
|
|
Application
|
|
|
Other assets(a)
|
|
$
|
52,511
|
|
|
$
|
52,361
|
|
Long-term portion of debt and capital leases(b)
|
|
|
888,611
|
|
|
|
848,898
|
|
Additional
paid-in-capital(c)
|
|
|
2,254,511
|
|
|
|
2,308,992
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
$
|
(247,338
|
)
|
|
$
|
(262,256
|
)
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Other assets have been adjusted for the portion of the debt
issuance costs attributable to the 2.75% Convertible
Debentures that must be retrospectively allocated to the equity
component of the debt instrument through additional
paid-in-capital
as of the date of the notes issuance. |
64
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
(b) |
|
Long-term portion of debt and capital leases has been adjusted
to reflect retrospective recognition of the debt discount
created by bifurcating the equity component of the convertible
notes from the liability component. |
|
(c) |
|
Additional
paid-in-capital
has been adjusted to reflect recording, retrospectively, the
equity component of the convertible notes, as well as the equity
component allocation of the debt issuance costs attributable to
the 2.75% Convertible Debentures. |
Income
Taxes
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on
differences between the financial statement and tax bases of
assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect in the
years in which the differences are expected to reverse. We do
not provide for U.S. income taxes on the undistributed
earnings of our foreign subsidiaries, which we consider to be
indefinitely reinvested outside of the U.S.
We make judgments regarding the realizability of our deferred
tax assets. The balance sheet carrying value of our net deferred
tax assets is based on whether we believe that it is more likely
than not that we will generate sufficient future taxable income
to realize these deferred tax assets after consideration of all
available evidence. We regularly review our deferred tax assets
for recoverability considering historical profitability,
projected future taxable income, and the expected timing of the
reversals of existing temporary differences and tax planning
strategies.
Valuation allowances have been established for U.S. and
foreign deferred tax assets, which we believe do not meet the
more likely than not criteria for recognition. If we
are subsequently able to utilize all or a portion of the
deferred tax assets for which a valuation allowance has been
established, then we may be required to recognize these deferred
tax assets through the reduction of the valuation allowance
which could result in a material benefit to our results of
operations in the period in which the benefit is determined.
This benefit will exclude the recognition of the portion of the
valuation allowance which relates to net deferred tax assets
created as a result of stock-based compensation or other equity
transactions where prevailing guidance requires the change in
valuation allowance to be traced forward through
stockholders equity and recorded as additional
paid-in-capital.
We establish reserves for tax uncertainties that reflect the use
of the comprehensive model for the recognition and measurement
of uncertain tax positions. Under the comprehensive model, when
the minimum threshold for recognition is not met, a tax position
is recorded as the largest amount that is more than fifty
percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement.
Comprehensive
Loss
Total comprehensive loss, net of taxes, was approximately
$18.2 million, $24.6 million and $39.2 million
for fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. For the purposes
of comprehensive loss disclosures, we do not record tax
provisions or benefits for the net changes in the foreign
currency translation adjustment, as we intend to reinvest
undistributed earnings in our foreign subsidiaries permanently.
The components of accumulated other comprehensive income,
reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Stockholders
Equity and Comprehensive Loss, consisted of the following
(dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
$
|
13,067
|
|
|
$
|
15,874
|
|
|
$
|
15,145
|
|
Unrealized gains on marketable securities
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedge derivatives
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
(3,982
|
)
|
|
|
(879
|
)
|
Net unrealized losses on pensions (net of tax of $33, $0 &
$0, respectively)
|
|
|
(4,822
|
)
|
|
|
(4,325
|
)
|
|
|
(1,527
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,505
|
|
|
$
|
7,567
|
|
|
$
|
12,739
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Concentration
of Risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject us to significant
concentrations of credit risk principally consist of cash, cash
equivalents, and trade accounts receivable. We place our cash
and cash equivalents with financial institutions with high
credit ratings. As part of our cash and investment management
processes, we perform periodic evaluations of the credit
standing of the financial institutions with whom we maintain
deposits, and have not recorded any credit losses to-date. For
trade accounts receivable, we perform ongoing credit evaluations
of our customers financial condition and limit the amount
of credit extended when deemed appropriate. At
September 30, 2010 and 2009, no customer accounted for
greater than 10% of our net accounts receivable balance. No
customer accounted for more than 10% of our revenue for fiscal
2010, 2009 or 2008.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
Financial instruments including cash equivalents, marketable
securities, accounts receivable, and derivative instruments, are
carried in the financial statements at amounts that approximate
their fair value based on the short maturities of those
instruments. Refer to Note 10 for discussion of the fair
value of our long-term debt.
Foreign
Currency Translation
We have significant foreign operations and transact business in
various foreign currencies. In general, the functional currency
of a foreign operation is the local countrys currency.
Non-functional currency monetary balances are re-measured into
the functional currency of the subsidiary with any related gain
or loss recorded in other income (expense), net, in the
accompanying consolidated statements of operations. Assets and
liabilities of operations outside the United States, for which
the functional currency is the local currency, are translated
into United States dollars using period-end exchange rates.
Revenue and expenses are translated at the average exchange
rates in effect during each fiscal month during the year. The
effects of foreign currency translation adjustments are included
as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Foreign currency
transaction gains (losses) included in net loss for fiscal 2010,
2009, and 2008 were $3.5 million, $7.0 million, and
$(0.3) million, respectively.
Financial
Instruments and Hedging Activities
We utilize derivative instruments to hedge specific financial
risks such as interest rate and foreign exchange risk. We do not
engage in speculative hedging activity. In order for us to
account for a derivative instrument as a hedge, specific
criteria must be met, including: (i) ensuring at the
inception of the hedge that formal documentation exists for both
the hedging relationship and the entitys risk management
objective and strategy for undertaking the hedge and
(ii) at the inception of the hedge and on an ongoing basis,
the hedging relationship is expected to be highly effective in
achieving offsetting changes in fair value attributed to the
hedged risk during the period that the hedge is designated.
Further, an assessment of effectiveness is required whenever
financial statements or earnings are reported. Absent meeting
these criteria, changes in fair value are recognized in other
income (expense), net, in the consolidated statements of
operations. Once the underlying forecasted transaction is
realized, the gain or loss from the derivative designated as a
hedge of the transaction is reclassified from accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss) to the statement of operations, in
the appropriate revenue or expense caption. Any ineffective
portion of the derivatives designated as cash flow hedges is
recognized in current earnings.
Accounting
for Stock-Based Compensation
We account for stock-based compensation to employees and
directors, including grants of employee stock options, purchases
under employee stock purchase plans, awards in the form of
restricted shares (Restricted Stock) and awards in
the form of units of stock purchase rights (Restricted
Units) through recognition of the fair value of the
stock-based compensation as a charge against earnings. We
recognize stock-based compensation expense over the requisite
service period, net of estimated forfeitures. We will recognize
a benefit from stock-based
66
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
compensation in equity using the with-and-without approach for
the utilization of tax attributes. The Restricted Stock and
Restricted Units are collectively referred to as
Restricted Awards.
Net
Income (Loss) Per Share
We compute net income (loss) per share in accordance with the
Two-Class Method. Under the
two-class
method, basic net income per share is computed by dividing the
net income available to common stockholders by the
weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the
period. Net losses are not allocated to preferred stockholders.
We have determined that our outstanding Series B
convertible preferred stock represents a participating security
and as such the preferred shares are excluded from basic
earnings per share.
Diluted net income per share is computed using the more dilutive
of (a) the two-class method, or (b) the
if-converted
method. We allocate net income first to preferred stockholders
based on dividend rights and then to common and preferred
stockholders based on ownership interests. The weighted-average
number of common shares outstanding gives effect to all
potentially dilutive common equivalent shares, including
outstanding stock options and restricted stock, shares held in
escrow, contingently issuable shares under earn-out agreements
once earned, warrants, and potential issuance of stock upon
conversion of our 2.75% Convertible Debentures. The
convertible debentures are considered Instrument C securities
due to the fact that only the excess of the conversion value on
the date of conversion can be paid in our common shares; the
principal portion of the conversion must be paid in cash.
Therefore, only the shares of common stock potentially issuable
with respect to the excess of the conversion value over its
principal amount, if any, is considered as dilutive potential
common shares for purposes of calculating diluted net income per
share. The conversion value for the convertible debentures was
less than the principal amount since its issuance date and no
shares were assumed to be issued for purposes of computing the
diluted net loss per share.
Common equivalent shares are excluded from the computation of
diluted net income (loss) per share if their effect is
anti-dilutive. Potentially dilutive common equivalent shares
aggregating to 20.7 million shares, 31.6 million
shares and 33.1 million shares for the years ended
September 30, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively, have been
excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per share
because their inclusion would be anti-dilutive.
Recently
Issued Accounting Standards
In April 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update
(ASU)
No. 2010-17,
Revenue Recognition Milestone Method (Topic 605):
Milestone Method of Revenue Recognition. The ASU codifies
the consensus reached in Emerging Issues Task Force
(EITF) Issue
No. 08-9,
Milestone Method of Revenue Recognition. The amendments
to the FASB Accounting Standards Codification provide guidance
on defining a milestone and determining when it may be
appropriate to apply the milestone method of revenue recognition
for research or development transactions. Consideration that is
contingent on achievement of a milestone in its entirety may be
recognized as revenue in the period in which the milestone is
achieved only if the milestone is judged to meet certain
criteria to be considered substantive. The amendments in the ASU
are effective on a prospective basis for milestones achieved in
fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning
on or after June 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted. If
an entity elects early adoption and the period of adoption is
not the beginning of the entitys fiscal year, the entity
must apply the amendments retrospectively from the beginning of
the year of adoption. Entities may also elect to adopt the
amendments in the ASU retrospectively for all prior periods. We
do not expect the implementation of ASU No
2010-17 to
have a material impact on our financial statements.
In September 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
amended the Accounting Standards Codification as summarized in
ASU 2009-14,
Software (Topic 985): Certain Revenue Arrangements That
Include Software Elements, and ASU
2009-13,
Revenue Recognition (Topic 605): Multiple-Deliverable Revenue
Arrangements. As summarized in ASU
2009-14, ASC
Topic 985 has been amended to remove from the scope of industry
specific revenue accounting guidance for software and software
related transactions, tangible products containing software
components and non-software components that function together to
deliver the products essential
67
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
functionality. As summarized in ASU
2009-13, ASC
Topic 605 has been amended (1) to provide updated guidance
on whether multiple deliverables exist, how the deliverables in
an arrangement should be separated, and the consideration
allocated; (2) to require an entity to allocate revenue in
an arrangement using estimated selling prices of deliverables if
a vendor does not have vendor-specific objective evidence or
third-party evidence of selling price; and (3) to eliminate
the use of the residual method and require an entity to allocate
revenue using the relative selling price method. The accounting
changes summarized in ASU
2009-14 and
ASU 2009-13
are both effective for fiscal years beginning on or after
June 15, 2010. We are continuing to evaluate the potential
impact of these changes.
2010
Acquisitions
Acquisition
of SpinVox
On December 30, 2009, we acquired all of the outstanding
capital stock of SpinVox Limited (SpinVox), a
UK-based privately-held company engaged in the business of
providing
voicemail-to-text
services. The acquisition was a stock purchase and the goodwill
resulting from this acquisition is not expected to be deductible
for tax purposes. The results of operations of SpinVox have been
included in our results of operations from January 1, 2010.
The results of operations of SpinVox for the one day,
December 31, 2009, of the fiscal first quarter during which
SpinVox was a part of Nuance were excluded from our consolidated
results for the year ended September 30, 2010 as such
amounts for that one day were immaterial.
A summary of the preliminary allocation of the purchase
consideration is as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
67,500
|
|
Common Stock(a)
|
|
|
36,352
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase consideration
|
|
$
|
103,852
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation of the purchase consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
4,061
|
|
Accounts receivable(b)
|
|
|
11,140
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
5,856
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
1,585
|
|
Identifiable intangible assets
|
|
|
32,400
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
111,063
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
166,105
|
|
Current liabilities(c)
|
|
|
(61,201
|
)
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
(1,052
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(62,253
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$
|
103,852
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Approximately 2.3 million shares of our common stock,
valued at $15.81 per share based on the closing price of our
common stock on the acquisition date, were issued at closing. |
|
(b) |
|
Accounts receivable have been recorded at their estimated fair
value, which consists of the gross accounts receivable assumed
of $16.6 million, reduced by a fair value reserve of
$5.5 million representing the portion of contractually owed
accounts receivable which we do not expect to be collected. |
68
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
(c) |
|
Current liabilities include a commitment of EUR
25.0 million ($36.0 million based on the
December 31, 2009 exchange rate) fixed obligation, payable
in cash. |
The following are the identifiable intangible assets acquired
and their respective weighted average useful lives, as
determined based on a preliminary valuation (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In years)
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
$
|
23,400
|
|
|
|
12.0
|
|
Core and completed technology
|
|
|
8,400
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
Non-compete agreements
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
32,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
Fiscal 2010 Acquisitions
During fiscal 2010, we acquired an additional seven businesses
primarily to expand our product offerings and enhance our
technology base. The results of operations of these companies
have been included in our consolidated results from their
respective acquisition dates. The total consideration for these
acquisitions was $86.2 million, including the issuance of
1.2 million shares of our common stock valued at
$21.8 million. In allocating the total purchase
consideration for these acquisitions based on estimated fair
values, we preliminarily recorded $44.0 million of goodwill
and $33.9 million of identifiable intangible assets. The
allocations of the purchase consideration were based upon
preliminary valuations and our estimates and assumptions are
subject to change. Intangible assets acquired included primarily
core and completed technology and customer relationships with
weighted average useful lives of 6.7 years. The
acquisitions were primarily stock acquisitions and the goodwill
resulting from these acquisitions is expected to be deductible
for tax purposes.
2009
Acquisitions
Acquisition
of SNAPin
On October 1, 2008, we acquired all of the outstanding
capital stock of SNAPin, a developer of self-service software
for mobile devices, to expand our Enterprise offerings. The
acquisition was a taxable event.
In connection with our acquisition of SNAPin, we agreed to make
a contingent earn-out payment of up to $45.0 million to be
paid, if at all, based on the business achieving certain
performance targets that are measurable from the acquisition
date to December 31, 2009. In April 2010, a final earn out
amount of $21.2 million was agreed upon; we issued
593,676 shares of our common stock, valued at
$10.2 million, as our first payment under the earn-out
agreement. The remaining balance is payable in cash or stock,
solely at our option, on or before October 1, 2011 and is
included in long-term liabilities as of September 30, 2010.
69
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
A summary of the purchase price allocation for the acquisition
of SNAPin is as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock(a)
|
|
$
|
166,253
|
|
Stock options and restricted stock units assumed
|
|
|
11,523
|
|
Contingent earn-out consideration
|
|
|
21,200
|
|
Transaction costs
|
|
|
2,825
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase consideration
|
|
$
|
201,801
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation of the purchase consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
$
|
6,084
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
2,972
|
|
Deferred tax asset(b)
|
|
|
2,327
|
|
Identifiable intangible assets
|
|
|
60,900
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
161,558
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
233,841
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
(2,191
|
)
|
Deferred tax liability(b)
|
|
|
(2,327
|
)
|
Deferred revenue(c)
|
|
|
(27,522
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(32,040
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$
|
201,801
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Approximately 9.5 million shares of our common stock valued
at $15.81 per share were issued at closing and 1.1 million
shares valued at $14.11 per share were issued upon release of
shares held in escrow. |
|
(b) |
|
We recorded a deferred tax liability as a result of purchase
accounting associated with SNAPin. This results in an increase
of the net deferred tax asset and a reduction of the
corresponding valuation allowance in the consolidated group.
Therefore, there is no impact on goodwill related to the
deferred tax liability. |
|
(c) |
|
We assumed significant legal performance obligations related to
acquired customer contracts. We estimate the fair market value
of the obligations based on expected costs we will incur to
fulfill the obligation plus a normal profit margin. The fair
value of the legal performance obligations remaining to be
delivered on these customer contracts was approximately
$53.4 million and the remaining cash to be collected on
these contracts was approximately $25.9 million at the date
of acquisition. |
We assumed vested and unvested stock options that were converted
into options to purchase 1,258,708 shares of our common
stock and restricted stock units that were converted into
299,446 shares of our common stock. The fair value of the
assumed vested stock options and restricted stock units as of
the date of acquisition are included in the purchase price
above. The fair value of the assumed vested stock options was
calculated under the Black-Scholes option pricing model, with
the following weighted-average assumptions: dividend yield of
0.0%; expected volatility of 55.5%; average risk-free interest
rate of 2.8%; and an expected term of 4.8 years. Assumed
unvested stock options and restricted stock units as of the date
of acquisition will be recorded as stock-based compensation
expense over the requisite service period as disclosed in
Note 17.
70
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following are the identifiable intangible assets acquired
and their respective weighted average useful lives (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In years)
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
$
|
21,200
|
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
Core and completed technology
|
|
|
39,000
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
Non-compete agreements
|
|
|
700
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
60,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
Fiscal 2009 Acquisitions
During fiscal 2009, we acquired an additional six businesses
primarily to expand our product offerings and enhance our
technology base. The results of operations of these acquisitions
are included in our fiscal 2009 financial statements from their
respective acquisition dates. The total consideration for these
acquisitions was approximately $161.3 million,. The gross
purchase price consisted of the issuance of 6.4 million
shares of our common stock valued at $80.8 million,
$71.7 million in cash and $8.8 million for transaction
costs. Cash totaling $5.2 million has been placed in escrow
related to two of the acquisitions and has been excluded from
the total purchase consideration until the escrow contingencies
have been satisfied. In allocating the total purchase
consideration for these acquisitions based on estimated fair
values, we have recorded $63.1 million of goodwill,
$71.9 million of identifiable intangible assets, and
$26.3 million in net assets (resulting primarily from cash
assumed; acquired unbilled receivables, net of liabilities
assumed including contingencies; deferred income taxes; and
restructuring). We have assumed a $5.0 million tax
contingency established for uncertain foreign tax positions
relating to one of the acquisitions. Intangible assets acquired
included primarily core and completed technology and customer
relationships with weighted average useful lives of
9.5 years.
2008
Acquisitions
Acquisition
of PSRS
On September 26, 2008, we acquired PSRS, a business unit of
Royal Philips Electronics, a provider of speech recognition
solutions, primarily in the European healthcare market, for
total consideration of $101.2 million, consisting of: net
cash consideration of 66.3 million, which equated to
$97.1 million based on the exchange rate as of the
acquisition date, and transaction costs of $4.2 million.
The acquisition was a taxable event. Payment of
$34.4 million was made at the acquisition date and the
remaining deferred acquisition payment was paid in the first
quarter of fiscal 2010.
71
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
A summary of the purchase price allocation for the acquisition
of PSRS is as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
97,066
|
|
Transaction costs
|
|
|
4,167
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase consideration
|
|
$
|
101,233
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation of the purchase consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
2,374
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
8,223
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
4,641
|
|
Identifiable intangible assets
|
|
|
54,099
|
|
In-process research and development
|
|
|
2,601
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
53,833
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
125,771
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
(5,757
|
)
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
(18,781
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(24,538
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$
|
101,233
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets include refundable research and development
credits, refundable value added tax payments, prepaid expenses
and inventory. Other liabilities assumed primarily relate to
deferred tax liabilities, statutory benefits due to PSRS
employees and deferred revenue. The in-process research and
development of $2.6 million was expensed at the time of
acquisition as the related projects had not yet reached
technological feasibility and it was deemed that the research
and development in-progress had no alternative future uses.
The following are the identifiable intangible assets acquired
and their respective weighted average lives (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In years)
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
$
|
45,197
|
|
|
|
9.0
|
|
Core and completed technology
|
|
|
7,924
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
|
Tradename
|
|
|
978
|
|
|
|
9.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
54,099
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition
of Multi-Vision
On July 31, 2008, we acquired all of the outstanding
capital stock of Multi-Vision, a provider of technology for
proactive notification which can be implemented as a hosted
application or on a customers premises, for total purchase
consideration of approximately $10.5 million, which
included 0.5 million shares of our common stock valued at
$15.59 per share. The acquisition was a taxable event.
We agreed to make contingent earn-out payments of up to
$15.0 million, payable in stock, or cash, solely at our
discretion, relating to earn-out provisions described in the
share purchase agreement. We have notified the former
shareholders of Multi-Vision that the performance targets were
not achieved and at September 30, 2010, we have not
recorded any obligation relative to these measures.
72
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The purchase price allocation for the acquisition of
Multi-Vision is as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
1,000
|
|
Common stock issued
|
|
|
8,348
|
|
Debt assumed
|
|
|
331
|
|
Transaction costs
|
|
|
845
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase consideration
|
|
$
|
10,524
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation of the purchase consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable and acquired unbilled accounts receivable
|
|
$
|
2,330
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
1,234
|
|
Identifiable intangible assets
|
|
|
9,630
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
2,585
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
15,779
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
(1,886
|
)
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
(3,369
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(5,255
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$
|
10,524
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities include deferred tax liabilities and deferred
revenue.
The following are the identifiable intangible assets acquired
and their respective weighted average lives (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In years)
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
$
|
7,200
|
|
|
|
8.9
|
|
Core and completed technology
|
|
|
2,400
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
Non-compete
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
9,630
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition
of eScription
On May 20, 2008, we acquired all of the outstanding capital
stock of eScription, a provider of hosted and premises-based
computer-aided medical transcription solutions, for total
purchase consideration of $412.1 million, which included
0.2 million shares of our common stock valued at $17.98 per
share issued at closing and 0.7 million shares valued at
$12.34 per share and 0.3 million shares valued at $13.77
per share issued in fiscal 2009 upon release of shares held in
escrow. During the second quarter of fiscal 2009, we elected to
treat this acquisition as an asset purchase under provisions
contained in the Internal Revenue Code. See Note 20 for
further discussion of this election.
73
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
A summary of the purchase price allocation for the acquisition
of eScription is as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
354,071
|
|
Common stock issued
|
|
|
16,162
|
|
Stock options and restricted stock units assumed
|
|
|
32,606
|
|
Transaction costs
|
|
|
9,295
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase consideration
|
|
$
|
412,134
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation of the purchase consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
4,520
|
|
Accounts receivable and acquired unbilled accounts receivable
|
|
|
9,838
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
6,282
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
2,758
|
|
Identifiable intangible assets
|
|
|
157,700
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
237,846
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
418,944
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
(4,730
|
)
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
(2,080
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(6,810
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$
|
412,134
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets include prepaid expenses and other current assets.
Other liabilities assumed primarily relate to deferred tax
liabilities, deferred revenue and amounts accrued relating to
excess facilities accrued as a component of accrued business
combination costs.
We assumed vested and unvested stock options for the purchase of
2,846,118 shares of Nuance common stock, and restricted
stock units that may convert in to 806,044 shares of Nuance
common stock, in connection with our acquisition of eScription.
These stock options and restricted stock units are governed by
the original agreements under which they were issued under the
eScription Stock Option Plan, but are now exercisable for, or
will vest into, shares of Nuance common stock. Assumed vested
stock options and restricted stock units as of the date of
acquisition are included in the purchase price above. The fair
value of the assumed vested stock options is calculated under
the Black-Scholes option pricing model, with the following
weighted-average assumptions: dividend yield of 0.0%, expected
volatility of 50.8%, average risk-free interest rate of 2.3% and
an expected term of 1.9 years. Assumed unvested stock
options and restricted stock units as of the date of acquisition
will be recorded as stock-based compensation expense over the
requisite service period as disclosed in Note 17.
74
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following are the identifiable intangible assets acquired
and their respective weighted average lives (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In years)
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
$
|
130,300
|
|
|
|
9.0
|
|
Core and completed technology
|
|
|
24,300
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
Non-compete
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
Tradenames
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
157,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition
of Viecore
On November 26, 2007, we acquired all of the outstanding
capital stock of Viecore, a consulting and systems integration
firm, for total purchase consideration of approximately
$112.4 million, which included 4.4 million shares of
our common stock valued at $21.01 per share issued at closing
and 0.6 million shares valued at $9.05 per share issued in
fiscal 2009 upon release of shares held in escrow. The
acquisition was a non-taxable event.
A summary of the purchase price allocation for the acquisition
of Viecore is as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued
|
|
$
|
98,405
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
8,874
|
|
Transaction costs
|
|
|
4,695
|
|
Debt assumed
|
|
|
384
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase consideration
|
|
$
|
112,358
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation of the purchase consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
5,491
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
13,848
|
|
Acquired unbilled accounts receivable
|
|
|
19,151
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
1,529
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
1,327
|
|
Identifiable intangible assets
|
|
|
22,770
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
79,421
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
143,537
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
(7,438
|
)
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
(23,741
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(31,179
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$
|
112,358
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following are the identifiable intangible assets acquired
and their respective weighted average lives (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In years)
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
$
|
22,390
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
Tradename
|
|
|
380
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
22,770
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition
of Vocada
On November 2, 2007, we acquired all of the outstanding
capital stock of Vocada, a provider of software and services for
managing critical medical test results for total purchase
consideration of approximately $22.4 million, which
included 0.8 million shares of our common stock valued at
$20.47 per share issued at closing and 0.1 million shares
valued at $10.36 per share issued in fiscal 2009 upon release of
shares held in escrow. The acquisition was a non-taxable event.
In connection with our acquisition of Vocada, we agreed to make
contingent earn-out payments of up to $21.0 million upon
the achievement of certain financial targets measured over
defined periods through December 31, 2010, in accordance
with the merger agreement. Payments, if any, may be made in the
form of cash or shares of our common stock, at our sole
discretion. We have notified the former shareholders of Vocada
that the financial targets for certain periods were not
achieved. The former shareholders of Vocada have requested
additional information regarding this determination. We are
currently in discussions with the former shareholders of Vocada
regarding this matter. As of September 30, 2010, we have
not recorded any obligation relative to these measures.
A summary of the purchase price allocation for the acquisition
of Vocada is as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued
|
|
$
|
18,320
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
3,186
|
|
Transaction costs
|
|
|
910
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase consideration
|
|
$
|
22,416
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation of the purchase consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable and acquired unbilled accounts receivable
|
|
$
|
2,964
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
429
|
|
Identifiable intangible assets
|
|
|
5,930
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
15,292
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
24,615
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities
|
|
|
(305
|
)
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
(1,894
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(2,199
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$
|
22,416
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following are the identifiable intangible assets acquired
and their respective weighted average lives (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In years)
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
$
|
3,800
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
Core and completed technology
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
Trademark
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
Non-compete
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
5,930
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.
|
Pro Forma
Results (Unaudited)
|
The following table shows unaudited pro forma results of
operations as if we had acquired SpinVox on October 1, 2008
(dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
1,130,924
|
|
|
$
|
967,868
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(50,663
|
)
|
|
$
|
(122,030
|
)
|
Net loss per share
|
|
$
|
(0.18
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.48
|
)
|
We have not furnished pro forma financial information relating
to our other fiscal 2010 and 2009 acquisitions because such
information is not material, individually or in the aggregate,
to our financial results. The unaudited pro forma results of
operations are not necessarily indicative of the actual results
that would have occurred had the transactions actually taken
place at the beginning of the periods indicated.
|
|
5.
|
Contingent
Acquisition Payments
|
Contingent acquisition payment arrangements related to
acquisitions completed during fiscal 2009 and 2008 are discussed
above in Note 3. In addition to those transactions, we
remain a party to certain contingent consideration arrangements
relative to acquisitions completed in other fiscal years. Those
arrangements are discussed below.
Earn-out
Payments
In accordance with our adoption of ASC 805 in fiscal 2010,
for business combinations occurring subsequent to
October 1, 2009, the fair value of any contingent
consideration has been established at the acquisition date and
included as purchase price with subsequent changes to the
estimated fair value recorded as an adjustment in current
earnings in each reporting period. Contingent consideration
related to acquisitions prior to our adoption of ASC 805
have been and will continue to be recorded as additional
purchase price when the contingency is resolved and additional
consideration is due.
In connection with an immaterial acquisition during fiscal 2010,
we agreed to make contingent earn-out payments of up to
$2.5 million, payable in stock, upon the achievement of
certain financial targets. At the acquisition date, we recorded
$1.0 million as the fair value of the contingent
consideration. For the year ended September 30, 2010, we
have recorded income of $0.3 million as fair value
adjustments included in acquisition-related costs, net in our
consolidated statement of operations.
In connection with our acquisition of Commissure, Inc.
(Commissure) in September 2007, we agreed to make
contingent earn-out payments of up to $8.0 million, payable
in stock, or cash, solely at our discretion, upon
77
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
the achievement of certain financial targets for the fiscal
years 2008, 2009 and 2010. Earn-out payments, if any, will be
recorded as incremental purchase price and allocated to
goodwill. We have notified the former shareholders of Commissure
that the financial targets for the fiscal years 2008 and 2009
were not achieved and the related contingent earn-out payment
was not earned. Through September 30, 2010, we have not
recorded any earn-out obligation relative to the Commissure
acquisition.
In November 2008, we amended the earn-out provisions set forth
in the merger agreement related to the acquisition of Mobile
Voice Control, Inc. (MVC) such that the former
shareholders of MVC were eligible to earn 377,964 and
755,929 shares of common stock based on the achievement of
calendar 2008 and 2009 financial targets, respectively. We
notified the former shareholders of MVC that the financial
targets for calendar 2008 and 2009 were not achieved and
therefore we have not recorded any obligation relative to these
measures
In connection with our acquisition of Phonetic Systems Ltd.
(Phonetic) in February 2005, we agreed to make
contingent earn-out payments of $35.0 million upon
achievement of certain established financial and performance
targets, in accordance with the merger agreement. In December
2009, we paid $11.3 million to the former shareholders of
Phonetic in final settlement of the contingent earn-out
provisions and recorded the amount paid as additional purchase
price related to the Phonetic acquisition.
Escrow
and Holdback Arrangements
In connection with certain of our acquisitions, we have placed
either cash or shares of our common stock in escrow to satisfy
any indemnification claims we may have. If no claims are made,
the escrowed amounts will be released to the former shareholders
of the acquired companies. Historically, under the previous
accounting guidance SFAS No. 141, Business
Combinations (SFAS 141), we could not make
a determination, beyond a reasonable doubt, whether the escrow
would become payable to the former shareholders of these
companies until the escrow period had expired. Accordingly these
amounts were treated as contingent purchase price until it was
determined that the escrow was payable, at which time the
escrowed amounts would be recorded as additional purchase price
and allocated to goodwill. Under the revised accounting guidance
of ASC 805, escrow payments are generally considered part
of the initial purchase consideration and accounted for as
goodwill.
The following table summarizes the terms of the escrow
arrangements that were entered into under the guidance of
SFAS 141 that have not been released as of
September 30, 2010 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initially Scheduled
|
|
|
|
|
|
Escrow
|
|
|
|
|
|
Release Date
|
|
Cash Payment
|
|
|
X-Solutions Group B.V
|
|
December 10, 2010
|
|
$
|
1,050
|
|
eCopy
|
|
December 30, 2010
|
|
|
4,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
6.
|
Goodwill
and Intangible Assets
|
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for fiscal years
2010 and 2009, are as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of October 1, 2008
|
|
$
|
1,655,773
|
|
Goodwill acquired
|
|
|
200,501
|
|
Escrow amounts released
|
|
|
30,869
|
|
Purchase accounting adjustments
|
|
|
4,956
|
|
Effect of foreign currency translation
|
|
|
(1,096
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of September 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
1,891,003
|
|
Goodwill acquired
|
|
|
155,076
|
|
Escrow amounts released
|
|
|
3,700
|
|
Purchase accounting adjustments
|
|
|
30,111
|
|
Effect of foreign currency translation
|
|
|
(1,947
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of September 30, 2010
|
|
$
|
2,077,943
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase accounting adjustments recorded in fiscal 2010
consisted primarily of a $13.1 million increase due to a
change in the fair value estimate of acquired intangible assets
from our fourth quarter fiscal 2009 acquisition of eCopy, a
$11.3 million increase related to the Phonetic earn-out
payment, an $8.3 million increase to the SNAPin earn-out
liability based on the final settlement discussed in Note 3
above. These increases were partially offset by a
$1.9 million reduction to the PSRS purchase price based on
a final working capital adjustment that was agreed to with the
former shareholder of PSRS in November 2009.
Purchase accounting adjustments recorded in fiscal 2009
consisted primarily of the following increases:
$18.9 million of additional purchase price upon our
election to treat our acquisition of eScription as an asset
purchase under Section 338(h)(10) of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986 (as amended) and $10.8 million related to the
final determination of the fair value estimate of contingent
liabilities assumed; partially offset by the following
decreases: a $9.7 million reversal of assumed deferred tax
liabilities as a result of our election to treat eScription as
an asset purchase, $5.8 million related to the utilization
of acquired net operating losses from acquisitions, a
$6.3 million adjustment to deferred taxes, and a
$4.7 million decrease in accrued transaction costs.
Intangible assets consist of the following as of
September 30, 2010 and 2009, which includes
$151.0 million and $112.7 million of licensed
technology, respectively (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
Gross Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Net Carrying
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Life (Years)
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
$
|
597,672
|
|
|
$
|
(231,079
|
)
|
|
$
|
366,593
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
Technology and patents
|
|
|
389,508
|
|
|
|
(124,607
|
)
|
|
|
264,901
|
|
|
|
8.6
|
|
Tradenames, trademarks, and other
|
|
|
38,798
|
|
|
|
(14,047
|
)
|
|
|
24,751
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
Non-competition agreements
|
|
|
5,068
|
|
|
|
(3,248
|
)
|
|
|
1,820
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
1,031,046
|
|
|
|
(372,981
|
)
|
|
|
658,065
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
|
Tradename, indefinite life
|
|
|
27,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,800
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,058,846
|
|
|
$
|
(372,981
|
)
|
|
$
|
685,865
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
Gross Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Net Carrying
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Life (Years)
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
$
|
565,654
|
|
|
$
|
(159,150
|
)
|
|
$
|
406,504
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
Technology and patents
|
|
|
341,504
|
|
|
|
(83,882
|
)
|
|
|
257,622
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
Tradenames, trademarks, and other
|
|
|
17,543
|
|
|
|
(5,374
|
)
|
|
|
12,169
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
Non-competition agreements
|
|
|
5,707
|
|
|
|
(2,997
|
)
|
|
|
2,710
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
930,408
|
|
|
|
(251,403
|
)
|
|
|
679,005
|
|
|
|
7.1
|
|
Tradename, indefinite life
|
|
|
27,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,800
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
958,208
|
|
|
$
|
(251,403
|
)
|
|
$
|
706,805
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included with the technology and patents grouping above are
assets totaling $45 million relating to purchases of
patents and licenses in fiscal 2010. We made payments to third
parties of both cash and shares of our common stock in
connection with these acquisitions, a total of
2,180,600 shares of our common stock were issued subject to
price guarantees as described further in Note 11. The
weighted average useful life related to these acquired assets is
10 years.
In June 2009, we entered into a joint marketing and selling
agreement with a third party and paid $7.0 million in
consideration of the arrangement. We have capitalized the
payment as an intangible asset, included in the tradenames,
trademarks, and other grouping above, and assigned a useful life
of 3 years, commensurate with the legal term of the rights
in the arrangement. In addition to the $7.0 million paid in
June 2009, we issued 879,567 shares of our common stock
valued at $13.0 million in December 2009 upon the third
party meeting certain performance criteria under the agreement.
The additional $13.0 million was capitalized in fiscal 2010
and classified in the same manner as the initial
$7.0 million payment.
In December 2008, we acquired a speech-related patent portfolio
from the same third party and a royalty free
paid-up
perpetual license providing us with access to, and use of, the
third partys speech-related source code for an aggregate
purchase price of $50.0 million. These assets are included
within the technology and patents asset grouping above. The
weighted average useful life related to these acquired assets is
8.7 years. We agreed to pay an additional license fee of up
to $20.0 million if certain revenue growth targets were met
in calendar 2009. Any additional license fee was to be payable
in cash or stock at our sole discretion on March 1, 2010.
In June 2009, this additional license fee provision was amended,
and as a result we no longer have any amounts due under this
agreement.
Amortization expense for acquired technology and patents is
included in the cost of revenue from amortization of intangible
assets in the accompanying statements of operations and amounted
to $47.8 million, $38.4 million and $24.4 million
in fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Amortization
expense for customer relationships; tradenames, trademarks, and
other; and non-competition agreements is included in operating
expenses and was
80
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
$87.8 million, $77.0 million and $58.2 million in
fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Estimated amortization
expense for each of the five succeeding years as of
September 30, 2010, is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending September 30,
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
51,268
|
|
|
$
|
84,055
|
|
|
$
|
135,323
|
|
2012
|
|
|
47,024
|
|
|
|
73,846
|
|
|
|
120,870
|
|
2013
|
|
|
41,250
|
|
|
|
59,107
|
|
|
|
100,357
|
|
2014
|
|
|
32,710
|
|
|
|
52,006
|
|
|
|
84,716
|
|
2015
|
|
|
28,997
|
|
|
|
42,783
|
|
|
|
71,780
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
63,652
|
|
|
|
81,367
|
|
|
|
145,019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
264,901
|
|
|
$
|
393,164
|
|
|
$
|
658,065
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, excluding acquired unbilled accounts
receivable, consisted of the following (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Trade accounts receivable
|
|
$
|
214,861
|
|
|
$
|
197,176
|
|
Unbilled accounts receivable under long-term contracts
|
|
|
15,856
|
|
|
|
15,311
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross accounts receivable
|
|
|
230,717
|
|
|
|
212,487
|
|
Less allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
(6,301
|
)
|
|
|
(6,833
|
)
|
Less allowance for sales returns
|
|
|
(6,829
|
)
|
|
|
(6,106
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
$
|
217,587
|
|
|
$
|
199,548
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.
|
Land,
Building and Equipment, Net
|
Land, building and equipment, net at September 30, 2010 and
2009 were as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
Useful Life
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In years)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,400
|
|
|
$
|
2,400
|
|
Building
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
5,363
|
|
|
|
5,117
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
3-5
|
|
|
|
5,786
|
|
|
|
5,558
|
|
Computers, software and equipment
|
|
|
3-5
|
|
|
|
108,278
|
|
|
|
75,586
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
2-7
|
|
|
|
15,659
|
|
|
|
15,073
|
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
10,759
|
|
|
|
10,366
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
662
|
|
|
|
4,266
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
148,907
|
|
|
|
118,366
|
|
Less: accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(86,824
|
)
|
|
|
(64,898
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land, building and equipment, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
62,083
|
|
|
$
|
53,468
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
At September 30, 2009, construction in progress related to
the build-out of hosted data centers. Depreciation expense,
associated with building and equipment, for fiscal 2010, 2009
and 2008 was $21.6 million, $18.7 million and
$16.4 million, respectively.
|
|
9.
|
Accrued
Expenses and Other Current Liabilities
|
Accrued expenses consisted of the following (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
$
|
56,047
|
|
|
$
|
52,600
|
|
Sales and marketing incentives(a)
|
|
|
40,780
|
|
|
|
4,413
|
|
Cost of revenue related liabilities
|
|
|
10,028
|
|
|
|
7,585
|
|
Accrued business combination costs
|
|
|
10,197
|
|
|
|
12,144
|
|
Professional fees
|
|
|
9,908
|
|
|
|
8,945
|
|
Sales and other taxes payable
|
|
|
5,211
|
|
|
|
5,913
|
|
Acquisition costs and liabilities
|
|
|
4,970
|
|
|
|
8,522
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
4,357
|
|
|
|
7,185
|
|
Deferred tax liability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,614
|
|
Security price guarantee
|
|
|
1,034
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
9,089
|
|
|
|
8,042
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
151,621
|
|
|
$
|
116,963
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Accrued sales and marketing incentives include a EUR
25.0 million ($34.0 million based on the
September 30, 2010 exchange rate) fixed obligation assumed
in connection with our acquisition of SpinVox as disclosed in
Note 3. During the third quarter of fiscal 2010, we placed
EUR 18.0 million ($24.5 million based on the
September 30, 2010 exchange rate) in an irrevocable standby
letter of credit account. These funds are restricted for the
payment of the portion of the fixed obligation due in December
2010 and has been reported as restricted cash in the
accompanying balance sheets. |
|
|
10.
|
Credit
Facilities and Debt
|
At September 30, 2010 and 2009, we had the following
borrowing obligations (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2.75% Convertible Debentures, net of unamortized discount
of $36.3 million and $44.9 million, respectively
|
|
$
|
213,654
|
|
|
$
|
205,064
|
|
Credit Facility
|
|
|
643,563
|
|
|
|
650,263
|
|
Obligations under capital leases and other
|
|
|
1,561
|
|
|
|
433
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
|
858,778
|
|
|
|
855,760
|
|
Less: current portion
|
|
|
7,764
|
|
|
|
6,862
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current portion of long-term debt
|
|
$
|
851,014
|
|
|
$
|
848,898
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The estimated fair value of our long-term debt approximated
$902.2 million and $893.2 million at
September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. These fair value
amounts represent the value at which our lenders could trade our
debt within the financial markets, and do not represent the
settlement value of these long-term debt liabilities to us at
each reporting date. The fair value of the long-term debt issues
will continue to vary each period
82
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
based on fluctuations in market interest rates, as well as
changes to our credit ratings. These fluctuations may have
little to no correlation to our reported debt balances. The term
loan portion of our Credit Facility is traded and the fair
values are based upon traded prices as of the reporting dates.
The fair values of the 2.75% Convertible Debentures at each
respective reporting date were estimated using the averages of
the September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009 bid and
ask trading quotes. We had no outstanding balance on the
revolving credit line portion of our Credit Facility. Our
capital lease obligations and other debt are not traded and the
fair values of these instruments are assumed to approximate
their carrying values as of September 30, 2010 and
September 30, 2009.
2.75% Convertible
Debentures
On August 13, 2007, we issued $250 million of 2.75%
convertible senior debentures due in 2027 (the 2027
Debentures) in a private placement to Citigroup Global
Markets Inc. and Goldman, Sachs & Co. Total proceeds,
net of debt discount of $7.5 million and deferred debt
issuance costs of $1.1 million, were $241.4 million.
The 2027 Debentures bear an interest rate of 2.75% per annum,
payable semi-annually in arrears beginning on February 15,
2008, and mature on August 15, 2027 subject to the right of
the holders of the 2027 Debentures to require us to redeem the
2027 Debentures on August 15, 2014, 2017 and 2022. Upon the
adoption of
ASC 470-20,
the difference of $54.7 million between the fair value of
the liability component of the 2027 Debentures and the net
proceeds on the date of issuance was retrospectively recorded as
additional
paid-in-capital
and additional debt discount. The aggregate debt discount,
consisting of both the discount related to the adoption of
ASC 470-20
and the date of issuance difference between the principal amount
of the 2027 Debentures and the net proceeds received, and debt
issuance costs are being amortized to interest expense using the
effective interest rate method through August 2014. As of
September 30, 2010 and 2009, the ending unamortized
discount was $36.3 million and $44.9 million,
respectively, and the ending unamortized deferred debt issuance
costs were $0.4 million and $0.5 million,
respectively. The 2027 Debentures are general senior unsecured
obligations, ranking equally in right of payment to all of our
existing and future unsecured, unsubordinated indebtedness and
senior in right of payment to any indebtedness that is
contractually subordinated to the 2027 Debentures. The 2027
Debentures are effectively subordinated to our secured
indebtedness to the extent of the value of the collateral
securing such indebtedness and are structurally subordinated to
indebtedness and other liabilities of our subsidiaries. If
converted, the principal amount of the 2027 Debentures is
payable in cash and any amounts payable in excess of the
$250 million principal amount, will (based on an initial
conversion rate, which represents an initial conversion price of
$19.47 per share, subject to adjustment) be paid in cash or
shares of our common stock, at our election, only in the
following circumstances and to the following extent: (i) on
any date during any fiscal quarter beginning after
September 30, 2007 (and only during such fiscal quarter) if
the closing sale price of our common stock was more than 120% of
the then current conversion price for at least 20 trading days
in the period of the 30 consecutive trading days ending on the
last trading day of the previous fiscal quarter;
(ii) during the five consecutive
business-day
period following any five consecutive
trading-day
period in which the trading price for $1,000 principal amount of
the Debentures for each day during such five
trading-day
period was less than 98% of the closing sale price of our common
stock multiplied by the then current conversion rate;
(iii) upon the occurrence of specified corporate
transactions, as described in the indenture for the 2027
Debentures; and (iv) at the option of the holder at any
time on or after February 15, 2027. Additionally, we may
redeem the 2027 Debentures, in whole or in part, on or after
August 20, 2014 at par plus accrued and unpaid interest;
each holder shall have the right, at such holders option,
to require us to repurchase all or any portion of the 2027
Debentures held by such holder on August 15, 2014,
August 15, 2017 and August 15, 2022. Upon conversion,
we will pay cash and shares of our common stock (or, at our
election, cash in lieu of some or all of such common stock), if
any. If we undergo a fundamental change (as described in the
indenture for the 2027 Debentures) prior to maturity, holders
will have the option to require us to repurchase all or any
portion of their debentures for cash at a price equal to 100% of
the principal amount of the debentures to be purchased plus any
accrued and unpaid interest, including any additional interest
to, but excluding, the repurchase date. As of September 30,
2010, no conversion triggers were met. If the conversion
triggers were met, we could be required to repay all or some of
the principal amount in cash prior to the maturity date.
83
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Credit
Facility
We entered into a credit facility which consists of a
$75 million revolving credit line including letters of
credit, a $355 million term loan entered into on
March 31, 2006, a $90 million term loan entered into
on April 5, 2007 and a $225 million term loan entered
into on August 24, 2007 (the Credit Facility).
The term loans are due March 2013 and the revolving credit line
is due March 2012. As of September 30, 2010,
$643.6 million remained outstanding under the term loans,
there were $21.2 million of letters of credit issued under
the revolving credit line and there were no other outstanding
borrowings under the revolving credit line.
The Credit Facility contains covenants, including, among other
things, covenants that restrict our ability and those of our
subsidiaries to incur certain additional indebtedness, create or
permit liens on assets, enter into sale-leaseback transactions,
make loans or investments, sell assets, make certain
acquisitions, pay dividends, or repurchase stock. The agreement
also contains events of default, including failure to make
payments of principal or interest, failure to observe covenants,
breaches of representations and warranties, defaults under
certain other material indebtedness, failure to satisfy material
judgments, a change of control and certain insolvency events. As
of September 30, 2010, we were in compliance with the
covenants under the Credit Facility.
Borrowings under the Credit Facility bear interest at a rate
equal to the applicable margin plus, at our option, either
(a) the base rate (which is the higher of the corporate
base rate of UBS AG, Stamford Branch, or the federal funds rate
plus 0.50% per annum) or (b) LIBOR (equal to (i) the
British Bankers Association Interest Settlement Rates for
deposits in U.S. dollars divided by (ii) one minus the
statutory reserves applicable to such borrowing). The applicable
margin for term loan borrowings under the Credit Facility ranges
from 0.75% to 1.50% per annum with respect to base rate
borrowings and from 1.75% to 2.50% per annum with respect to
LIBOR-based borrowings, depending on our leverage ratio. The
applicable margin for the revolving loan borrowings under the
Credit Facility ranges from 0.50% to 1.25% per annum with
respect to base rate borrowings and from 1.50% to 2.25% per
annum with respect to LIBOR-based borrowings, depending upon our
leverage ratio. As of September 30, 2010, the applicable
margin for the term loan was 1.00% for base rate borrowings and
1.75% for LIBOR-based borrowings. We are required to pay a
commitment fee for unutilized commitments under the revolving
credit facility at a rate ranging from 0.375% to 0.50% per
annum, based upon our leverage ratio. As of September 30,
2010, the commitment fee rate was 0.375% and the effective
interest rate was 2.02%.
We capitalized debt issuance costs related to the Credit
Facility and are amortizing the costs to interest expense using
the effective interest rate method through March 2012 for costs
associated with the revolving credit facility and through March
2013 for costs associated with the term loan. As of
September 30, 2010 and 2009, the ending unamortized
deferred financing fees were $5.8 million and
$7.7 million, respectively, and are included in other
assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.
The Credit Facility is subject to repayment in four equal
quarterly installments of 1% per annum ($6.7 million per
year, not including interest, which is also payable quarterly),
and an annual excess cash flow sweep, as defined in the Credit
Facility, which is payable beginning in the first quarter of
each fiscal year, beginning in fiscal 2008, based on the excess
cash flow generated in the previous fiscal year. We have not
generated excess cash flows in any period and no additional
payments are required. We will continue to evaluate the extent
to which a payment is due in the first quarter of future fiscal
years based on excess cash flow generation. At the current time,
we are unable to predict the amount of the outstanding
principal, if any, that may be required to be repaid in future
fiscal years pursuant to the excess cash flow sweep provisions.
Any term loan borrowings not paid through the baseline
repayment, the excess cash flow sweep, or any other mandatory or
optional payments that we may make, will be
84
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
repaid upon maturity. If only the baseline repayments are made,
the annual aggregate principal amount of the term loans repaid
would be as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending September 30,
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
6,700
|
|
2012
|
|
|
6,700
|
|
2013
|
|
|
630,163
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
643,563
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our obligations under the Credit Facility are unconditionally
guaranteed by, subject to certain exceptions, each of our
existing and future direct and indirect wholly-owned domestic
subsidiaries. The Credit Facility and the guarantees thereof are
secured by first priority liens and security interests in the
following: 100% of the capital stock of substantially all of our
domestic subsidiaries and 65% of the outstanding voting equity
interests and 100% of the non-voting equity interests of
first-tier foreign subsidiaries, all our material tangible and
intangible assets and those of the guarantors, and any present
and future intercompany debt. The Credit Facility also contains
provisions for mandatory prepayments of outstanding term loans
upon receipt of the following, and subject to certain
exceptions: 100% of net cash proceeds from asset sales, 100% of
net cash proceeds from issuance or incurrence of debt, and 100%
of extraordinary receipts. We may voluntarily prepay borrowings
under the Credit Facility without premium or penalty other than
breakage costs, as defined with respect to LIBOR-based loans.
|
|
11.
|
Financial
Instruments and Hedging Activities
|
Interest
Rate Swap Agreements
To manage the interest rate exposure on our variable-rate
borrowings, we use interest rate swaps to convert specific
variable-rate debt into fixed-rate debt. As of
September 30, 2010, we have two outstanding interest rate
swaps designated as cash flow hedges with an aggregate notional
amount of $200 million. The interest rates on these swaps
are 2.7% and 2.1%, plus the applicable margin for the Credit
Facility, and they expire in October 2010 and November 2010,
respectively. As of September 30, 2010 and 2009, the
aggregate cumulative unrealized gains (losses) related to these
swaps, and a previous swap that matured on March 31, 2009,
were $3.5 million and $(4.0) million, respectively and
were included in accumulated other comprehensive income in the
accompanying balance sheets.
Forward
Currency Contracts Designated as Cash Flow Hedges
During fiscal 2009 and 2010, we entered into foreign currency
contracts to hedge exposure on the variability of cash flows in
Canadian dollars which are designated as cash flow hedges. At
September 30, 2010 the unsettled contracts had an aggregate
remaining notional value of CAD$13.7 million
($13.3 million based on the September 30, 2010
exchange rate). These contracts settle monthly through October
2011. As of September 30, 2010, the aggregate cumulative
unrealized gains related to these contracts were immaterial.
During fiscal 2010, we entered into foreign currency contracts
to hedge exposure on the variability of cash flows in Hungarian
Forints (HUF) which are designated as cash flow
hedges. At September 30, 2010, the unsettled contracts had
an aggregate remaining notional value of HUF
1,017.0 million ($5.0 million based on the
September 30, 2010 exchange rate). These contracts settle
monthly through October 2011. As of September 30, 2010, the
aggregate cumulative unrealized gains related to these contracts
were immaterial.
Other
Derivative Activities
We have foreign currency contracts that are not designated as
hedges. Changes in fair value of foreign currency contracts not
qualifying as hedges are reported in earnings as part of other
income (expense), net.
85
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
During the three months ended December 31, 2008, we entered
into foreign currency forward contracts to offset foreign
currency exposure on the deferred acquisition payment of
44.3 million related to our acquisition of PSRS,
resulting in a net gain during that period of $8.0 million
included in other income (expense). The foreign currency
contracts matured and were settled on October 22, 2009. The
gain for the period from September 30, 2009 to settlement
on October 22, 2009 was $1.6 million, but was offset
in other income (expense), net by the loss resulting from the
corresponding change in the associated deferred acquisition
payment liability.
During fiscal 2010, we entered into a foreign currency forward
contract to offset foreign currency exposure on a fixed
obligation assumed in connection with our acquisition of SpinVox
as disclosed in Note 3. The notional value of the contract
is Euro 18.0 million. The contract matures in December
2010.
From time to time we will enter into agreements that allow us to
issue shares of our common stock as part or all of the
consideration related to partnering and technology acquisition
activities. These transactions are described in Notes 2 and
6. Generally these shares are issued subject to security price
guarantees which are accounted for as derivatives. We have
determined that these instruments would not be considered equity
instruments if they were freestanding. The security price
guarantees require payment from either us to a third party, or
from a third party to us, based upon the difference between the
price of our common stock on the issue date and an average price
of our common stock approximately six months following the issue
date. Changes in the fair value of these security price
guarantees are reported in earnings in each period as
non-operating income (expense) with other income (expense), net.
During the year ended September 30, 2010, we received cash
payments totaling $7.3 million upon the settlement of the
arrangements that closed during the year.
The following is a summary of the outstanding shares subject to
security price guarantees at September 30, 2010 (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
|
Total Value of Shares
|
Issue Date
|
|
Issued
|
|
Settlement Date
|
|
on Issue Date
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
753,800
|
|
|
October 1, 2010
|
|
$
|
12,400
|
|
June 24, 2010
|
|
|
152,440
|
|
|
December 24, 2010
|
|
$
|
2,500
|
|
September 28, 2010
|
|
|
1,178,732
|
|
|
March 28, 2011
|
|
$
|
18,400
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
1,572,607
|
|
|
March 30, 2011
|
|
$
|
24,800
|
|
86
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table provides a quantitative summary of the fair
value of our hedged and non-hedged derivative instruments as of
September 30, 2010 and 2009 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
Description
|
|
Balance Sheet Classification
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
$
|
767
|
|
|
$
|
8,682
|
|
Security Price Guarantees
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,299
|
|
Security Price Guarantees
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
(982
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset (liability) value of non-hedged derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
$
|
(215
|
)
|
|
$
|
10,981
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives Designated as Hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
$
|
729
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
(503
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,982
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset (liability) value of hedged derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
$
|
226
|
|
|
$
|
(3,982
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following tables summarize the activity of derivative
instruments for fiscal 2010 and 2009 (dollars in thousands):
Derivatives
Designated as Hedges for the Fiscal Year Ended September
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain (Loss)
|
|
Location and Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from
|
|
|
Recognized in OCI
|
|
Accumulated OCI into Income (Effective Portion)
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
|
$
|
734
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense),net
|
|
$
|
(5
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
$
|
3,479
|
|
|
$
|
(3,103
|
)
|
|
N/A
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Derivatives
Not Designated as Hedges for the Fiscal Year Ended September
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain
|
|
|
Location of Gain
|
|
Recognized in Income
|
|
|
Recognized in Income
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
$
|
767
|
|
|
$
|
8,682
|
|
Security price guarantees
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
$
|
4,026
|
|
|
$
|
2,299
|
|
We adopted the provisions of ASC 820 Fair Value
Measurement, relative to financial instruments on
October 1, 2008. ASC 820 defines fair value,
establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and enhances
disclosures about fair value measurements. Fair value is defined
as the price that would be received for an asset, or paid to
transfer a liability, in an orderly transaction between market
participants at the measurement date. Valuation techniques must
maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of
unobservable inputs.
87
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
ASC 820 establishes a value hierarchy based on three levels of
inputs, of which the first two are considered observable and the
third is considered unobservable:
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1. Quoted prices for identical
assets or liabilities in active markets which we can access.
|
|
|
|
Level 2. Observable inputs other than
those described as Level 1.
|
|
|
|
Level 3. Unobservable inputs.
|
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring
basis at September 30, 2010 and 2009 consisted of (dollars
in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market funds(a)
|
|
$
|
470,845
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
470,845
|
|
US government agency securities(a)
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
Marketable securities(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,366
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,366
|
|
Foreign currency exchange contracts(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,496
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,496
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets at fair value
|
|
$
|
471,845
|
|
|
$
|
34,862
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
506,707
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Security price guarantees(c)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
982
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
982
|
|
Interest rate swaps(d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
503
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
503
|
|
Contingent earn-out(e)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
724
|
|
|
|
724
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities at fair value
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,485
|
|
|
$
|
724
|
|
|
$
|
2,209
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market funds(a)
|
|
$
|
403,250
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
403,250
|
|
US government agency securities(a)
|
|
|
10,013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,013
|
|
Foreign currency exchange contracts(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,682
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,682
|
|
Security price guarantees(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,299
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,299
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets at fair value
|
|
$
|
413,263
|
|
|
$
|
10,981
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
424,244
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps(d)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,982
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,982
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities at fair value
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,982
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,982
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Money market funds and US government agency securities, included
in cash and cash equivalents in the accompanying balance sheet,
are valued at quoted market prices in active markets. |
|
(b) |
|
The fair value of our marketable securities and foreign currency
exchange contracts is based on the most recent observable inputs
for similar instruments in active markets or quoted prices for
identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active
or are directly or indirectly observable. |
|
(c) |
|
The fair values of the security price guarantees are determined
using a Black-Scholes model, derived from observable inputs such
as US treasury interest rates, our common stock price, and the
volatility of our common |
88
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
stock. The valuation model values both the put and call
components of the guarantees simultaneously, with the net value
of those components representing the fair value of each
instrument. |
|
(d) |
|
The fair values of the interest rate swaps are estimated using
discounted cash flow analyses that factor in observable market
inputs such as LIBOR based yield curves, forward
rates, and credit spreads. |
|
(e) |
|
The fair value of the contingent earn-out is estimated using the
probability of achieving certain financial targets established
in the purchase agreement together with the changes in our
common stock price. |
The following table provides a summary of changes in fair value
of our Level 3 financial instruments for the year ended
September 30, 2010 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of October 1, 2009
|
|
$
|
|
|
Earn-out liability established at time of acquisition
|
|
|
1,034
|
|
Charges (credits) to acquisition-related costs, net
|
|
|
(310
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of September 30, 2010
|
|
$
|
724
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.
|
Accrued
Business Combination Costs
|
We have, in connection with certain of our business
combinations, incurred restructuring costs. Restructuring costs
are typically comprised of severance costs, costs of
consolidating duplicate facilities and contract termination
costs. In accordance with our adoption of ASC 805 in fiscal
2010, restructuring expenses are recognized at the date of
acquisition if such restructuring costs meet the recognition
criteria in ASC 420, Exit or Disposal Cost Obligations.
Prior to our adoption of ASC 805, restructuring
expenses were recognized based upon plans that were committed to
by management at the date of acquisition, but were generally
subject to refinement during the purchase price allocation
period (generally within one year of the acquisition date). In
addition to plans resulting from the business combination,
previous acquisitions have included companies who have
established liabilities relating to lease exit costs as result
of their previous restructuring activities. Regardless of the
origin of the lease exit costs, we are required to make
assumptions relating to sublease terms, sublease rates and
discount rates. We base our estimates and assumptions on the
best information available at the time of the obligation having
arisen. These estimates are reviewed and revised as facts and
circumstances dictate, with any changes being recorded to
goodwill (for acquisitions completed prior to October
2009) or restructuring and other charges (credits), net.
Changes in these estimates could have a material effect on the
amount accrued on the balance sheet. Discussed in detail below
are two individually significant facilities which were abandoned
by the acquired company prior to our acquisition of the company,
and for which the obligations to the lessors, we have assumed.
In connection with the acquisitions of SpeechWorks
International, Inc. in August 2003 and Former Nuance in
September 2005, we assumed two individually significant lease
obligations that were abandoned prior to the acquisition dates.
These obligations expire in 2016 and 2012, respectively, and the
fair value of the obligations, net of estimated sublease income,
was recognized as a liability assumed by us in the allocation of
the final purchase price. The net payments have been discounted
in calculating the fair value of these obligations, and the
discount is being accreted through the term of the lease. Cash
payments net of sublease receipts are presented as cash used in
financing activities on the consolidated statements of cash
flows.
Additionally, prior to the adoption of ASC 805, we
implemented restructuring plans to eliminate duplicate
facilities, personnel or assets in connection with business
combinations. These costs were recognized as liabilities
assumed, and accordingly are included in the allocation of the
purchase price, generally resulting in an increase to the
recorded amount of the goodwill.
89
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The activity for the years ended September 30, 2010, 2009
and 2008, relating to all facilities and personnel recorded in
accrued business combination costs, is as follows (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facilities
|
|
|
Personnel
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance at October 1, 2007
|
|
$
|
49,240
|
|
|
$
|
779
|
|
|
$
|
50,019
|
|
Charged to goodwill
|
|
|
1,586
|
|
|
|
(68
|
)
|
|
|
1,518
|
|
Charged to restructuring and other charges, net
|
|
|
198
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
198
|
|
Charged to interest expense
|
|
|
1,718
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,718
|
|
Cash payments, net of sublease receipts
|
|
|
(11,564
|
)
|
|
|
(711
|
)
|
|
|
(12,275
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2008
|
|
|
41,178
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,178
|
|
Charged to goodwill
|
|
|
2,689
|
|
|
|
6,391
|
|
|
|
9,080
|
|
Charged to restructuring and other charges, net
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
Charged to interest expense
|
|
|
1,677
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,677
|
|
Cash payments, net of sublease receipts
|
|
|
(11,104
|
)
|
|
|
(3,894
|
)
|
|
|
(14,998
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2009
|
|
|
34,551
|
|
|
|
2,497
|
|
|
|
37,048
|
|
Charged to goodwill
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(759
|
)
|
|
|
(774
|
)
|
Charged to restructuring and other charges, net
|
|
|
(769
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(769
|
)
|
Charged to interest expense
|
|
|
1,241
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,241
|
|
Cash payments, net of sublease receipts
|
|
|
(11,137
|
)
|
|
|
(1,579
|
)
|
|
|
(12,716
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 20010
|
|
$
|
23,871
|
|
|
$
|
159
|
|
|
$
|
24,030
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Reported as:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
$
|
10,197
|
|
|
$
|
12,144
|
|
Long-term
|
|
|
13,833
|
|
|
|
24,904
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
24,030
|
|
|
$
|
37,048
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.
|
Restructuring
and Other Charges, net
|
Fiscal
2010
For fiscal 2010, we recorded net restructuring and other charges
of $18.7 million, which consisted primarily of
$9.6 million related to the elimination of approximately
175 personnel across multiple functions within our company,
including acquired entities, a $6.8 million write-off of
previously capitalized patent defense costs as a result of
unsuccessful litigation and $2.1 million of contract
termination costs.
Fiscal
2009
In fiscal 2009, we recorded restructuring and other charges of
$5.4 million, of which $5.3 million related to the
elimination of approximately 220 personnel across multiple
functions within our company.
Fiscal
2008
In fiscal 2008, we recorded restructuring and other charges of
$7.0 million, of which $4.2 million related to the
elimination of approximately 155 personnel across multiple
functions, $1.4 million related to a non-recurring,
90
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
adverse ruling arising from a vendors claims of
underpayment of historical royalties for technology discontinued
in 2005 and $1.4 million related to the consolidation or
elimination of excess facilities.
The following table sets forth the fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008
accrual activity relating to restructuring and other charges (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personnel
|
|
|
Facilities
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance at October 1, 2007
|
|
$
|
308
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
308
|
|
Restructuring and other charges (credits), net
|
|
|
4,231
|
|
|
|
1,397
|
|
|
|
1,393
|
|
|
|
7,021
|
|
Non-cash adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(4,173
|
)
|
|
|
(628
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,801
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2008
|
|
|
366
|
|
|
|
759
|
|
|
|
1,393
|
|
|
|
2,518
|
|
Restructuring and other charges (credits), net
|
|
|
5,283
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
5,409
|
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(5,042
|
)
|
|
|
(544
|
)
|
|
|
(1,396
|
)
|
|
|
(6,982
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2009
|
|
|
607
|
|
|
|
310
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
945
|
|
Restructuring and other charges (credits), net
|
|
|
9,634
|
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
8,871
|
|
|
|
18,660
|
|
Non-cash adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,833
|
)
|
|
|
(6,833
|
)
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(8,403
|
)
|
|
|
(182
|
)
|
|
|
(2,066
|
)
|
|
|
(10,651
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2010
|
|
$
|
1,838
|
|
|
$
|
283
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,121
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.
|
Supplemental
Cash Flow Information
|
Cash
paid for Interest and Income Taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Interest Paid
|
|
$
|
27,899
|
|
|
$
|
33,857
|
|
|
$
|
49,988
|
|
Income taxes paid
|
|
$
|
14,215
|
|
|
$
|
18,227
|
|
|
$
|
5,599
|
|
Non
Cash Investing and Financing Activities:
During fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008, we issued shares of our
common stock in connection with several of our business and
asset acquisitions, including shares initially held in escrow.
Note 3 details the shares of our common stock, including
per share prices thereof, issued in fiscal 2010, 2009, and 2008
to complete business acquisitions during those years.
Note 6 details the same information with regard to our
fiscal 2010 and 2009 intangible asset acquisitions. We did not
complete any significant asset acquisitions in fiscal 2008.
Preferred
Stock
We are authorized to issue up to 40,000,000 shares of
preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share. We have designated
100,000 shares as Series A Preferred Stock and
15,000,000 shares as Series B Preferred Stock. In
connection with the acquisition of ScanSoft from Xerox
Corporation (Xerox), we issued 3,562,238 shares
of Series B Preferred Stock to Xerox. On March 19,
2004, we announced that Warburg Pincus, a global private equity
firm, had agreed to purchase all outstanding shares of our stock
held by Xerox Corporation for approximately $80 million,
including the 3,562,238 shares of Series B Preferred
Stock. The Series B Preferred Stock is convertible into
shares of common stock on a
one-for-one
basis and has a liquidation preference of $1.30 per share plus
all declared but unpaid dividends. The holders of Series B
Preferred Stock are entitled to non-cumulative dividends at
91
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
the rate of $0.05 per annum per share, payable when, and if,
declared by the Board of Directors. To date, no dividends have
been declared by the Board of Directors. Holders of
Series B Preferred Stock have no voting rights, except
those rights provided under Delaware law. The undesignated
shares of preferred stock will have rights, preferences,
privileges and restrictions, including voting rights, dividend
rights, conversion rights, redemption privileges and liquidation
preferences, as shall be determined by the Board of Directors
upon issuance of the preferred stock. We have reserved
3,562,238 shares of our common stock for issuance upon
conversion of the Series B Preferred Stock. Other than the
3,562,238 shares of Series B Preferred Stock that are
issued and outstanding, there are no other shares of preferred
stock issued or outstanding in fiscal 2010 or fiscal 2009.
Common
Stock and Common Stock Warrants
Underwritten
Public Offerings in Fiscal 2008
On June 4, 2008, we completed an underwritten public
offering in which we sold 5,575,000 shares of our common
stock. Gross proceeds were $100.1 million, and the net
proceeds after underwriting commissions and other offering
expenses were $99.8 million.
On December 21, 2007, we completed an underwritten public
offering in which we sold 7,823,000 shares of our common
stock. Gross proceeds from this sale were $136.9 million,
and the net proceeds after underwriting commissions and other
offering expenses were $130.3 million.
Private
Placements of Securities
We have, from time to time, entered into stock and warrant
agreements with Warburg Pincus. In connection with these
agreements, we granted Warburg Pincus the right to request that
we use commercially reasonable efforts to register some or all
of the shares of common stock issued to them under each of their
purchase transactions, including shares of common stock
underlying the warrants. The following table summarizes the
warrant and stock activities with Warburg Pincus during the
three year period ended September 30, 2010:
Warrants
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
|
|
Date
|
|
per Share
|
|
Total Shares
|
|
Proceeds Received
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
April 7, 2010
|
|
$
|
4.94
|
|
|
|
2,500,000
|
|
|
$
|
12,350
|
|
September 15, 2009
|
|
|
5.00
|
|
|
|
3,177,570
|
|
|
|
15,888
|
|
July 29, 2009
|
|
|
5.00
|
|
|
|
863,236
|
|
|
|
4,316
|
|
July 29, 2009
|
|
|
0.61
|
|
|
|
525,732
|
|
|
|
321
|
|
Common
Stock Issued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date
|
|
Price per Share
|
|
Total Shares
|
|
Proceeds Received
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
January 29, 2009
|
|
$
|
10.06
|
|
|
|
17,395,626
|
|
|
$
|
175,046
|
|
May 20, 2008
|
|
|
17.36
|
|
|
|
5,760,369
|
|
|
|
100,110
|
|
At September 30, 2010, Warburg Pincus holds the following
warrants to purchase shares of our common stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance Date
|
|
Price per Share
|
|
Total Shares
|
|
Expiration Date
|
|
January 29, 2009
|
|
$
|
11.57
|
|
|
|
3,862,422
|
|
|
|
January 29, 2013
|
|
May 20, 2008
|
|
|
20.00
|
|
|
|
3,700,000
|
|
|
|
May 20, 2012
|
|
92
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Other
Common Stock Warrant Activity
On November 15, 2004, in connection with our acquisition of
Phonetic, we issued warrants to purchase 750,000 shares of
our common stock at an exercise price of $4.46 per share that
were to vest, if at all, upon the achievement of certain
performance targets. In December 2009, we paid
$11.3 million in cash to the former shareholders of
Phonetic in final settlement of the earn-out provisions of the
agreement. The 750,000 warrants did not vest and were cancelled
in connection with the final settlement.
In connection with the acquisition of SpeechWorks in 2003, we
issued a warrant to our investment banker, expiring on
August 11, 2011, for the purchase of 150,000 shares of
our common stock at an exercise price of $3.98 per share. The
warrant provides the holder with the option to exercise the
warrants on a net, or cashless, basis. The warrant became
exercisable on August 11, 2005, and was valued at its
issuance at $0.2 million based upon the Black-Scholes
option pricing model. In October 2006, the warrant was exercised
to purchase 125,620 shares of our common stock. The holder
of the warrant elected a cashless exercise resulting in a net
issuance of 75,623 shares of our common stock. In May 2010,
the remaining 12,190 shares were exercised in a cashless
exercise resulting in the issuance of 9,350 shares of
common stock.
We have determined that all of our common stock warrants should
be classified within the stockholders equity section of
the accompanying consolidated balance sheets based on the
conclusion that the above-noted warrants are indexed to our
common stock and are exercisable only into our common stock.
|
|
17.
|
Stock-Based
Compensation
|
We recognize stock-based compensation expense over the requisite
service period. Our share-based awards are accounted for as
equity instruments. The amounts included in the consolidated
statements of operations relating to stock-based compensation
are as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
Cost of product and licensing
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
Cost of professional services, subscription and hosting
|
|
|
11,043
|
|
|
|
9,889
|
|
|
|
7,991
|
|
Cost of maintenance and support
|
|
|
756
|
|
|
|
743
|
|
|
|
1,278
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
9,381
|
|
|
|
9,840
|
|
|
|
14,325
|
|
Selling and marketing
|
|
|
38,152
|
|
|
|
27,057
|
|
|
|
24,394
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
40,779
|
|
|
|
23,867
|
|
|
|
20,625
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
100,139
|
|
|
$
|
71,407
|
|
|
$
|
68,631
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
Options
We have share-based award plans under which employees, officers
and directors may be granted stock options to purchase our
common stock, generally at fair market value. During fiscal 2009
and 2010, stock options have been primarily granted to senior
management and officers of the Company. Our plans do not allow
for options to be granted at below fair market value, nor can
they be re-priced at any time. Options granted under plans
adopted by the Company become exercisable over various periods,
typically two to four years and have a maximum term of ten
years. We have also assumed options and option plans in
connection with certain of our acquisitions. These stock options
are governed by the plans and agreements that they were
originally issued under, but are now exercisable for shares of
our common stock.
93
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The table below summarizes activity relating to stock options
for the years ended September 30, 2010, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Term
|
|
|
Value(1)
|
|
|
Outstanding at October 1, 2007
|
|
|
18,240,722
|
|
|
$
|
6.48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed from eScription
|
|
|
2,846,118
|
|
|
$
|
4.35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
636,440
|
|
|
$
|
15.45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(5,861,906
|
)
|
|
$
|
3.19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(813,972
|
)
|
|
$
|
11.18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
(50,888
|
)
|
|
$
|
6.89
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2008
|
|
|
14,996,514
|
|
|
$
|
7.47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed from SNAPin
|
|
|
1,258,708
|
|
|
$
|
3.48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,092,000
|
|
|
$
|
12.07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(2,570,999
|
)
|
|
$
|
3.92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(987,399
|
)
|
|
$
|
15.44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
(234,958
|
)
|
|
$
|
12.67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2009
|
|
|
13,553,866
|
|
|
$
|
7.48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,200,000
|
|
|
$
|
13.81
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(3,433,701
|
)
|
|
$
|
5.39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(350,884
|
)
|
|
$
|
13.65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
(266,044
|
)
|
|
$
|
16.26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2010
|
|
|
10,703,237
|
|
|
$
|
8.44
|
|
|
|
3.5 years
|
|
|
$
|
78.4 million
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at September 30, 2010
|
|
|
9,137,554
|
|
|
$
|
7.62
|
|
|
|
3.1 years
|
|
|
$
|
74.2 million
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at September 30, 2009
|
|
|
10,575,346
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at September 30, 2008
|
|
|
10,473,073
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The aggregate intrinsic value on this table was calculated based
on the positive difference, if any, between the closing market
value of our common stock on September 30, 2010 ($15.64)
and the exercise price of the underlying options. |
As of September 30, 2010, the total unamortized fair value
of stock options was $7.0 million with a weighted average
remaining recognition period of 1.1 years. A summary of
weighted-average grant-date (including assumed options) fair
value and intrinsic value of stock options exercised is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
Weighted-average grant-date fair value per share
|
|
$
|
5.90
|
|
|
$
|
8.00
|
|
|
$
|
14.78
|
|
Total intrinsic value of stock options exercised (in millions)
|
|
$
|
36.1
|
|
|
$
|
21.0
|
|
|
$
|
89.6
|
|
94
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
We use the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the
grant-date fair value of an award. The fair value of the stock
options granted and unvested options assumed from acquisitions
were calculated using the following weighted-average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
50.9
|
%
|
|
|
55.1
|
%
|
|
|
53.9
|
%
|
Average risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
|
|
3.3
|
%
|
Expected term (in years)
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
The dividend yield of zero is based on the fact that we have
never paid cash dividends and have no present intention to pay
cash dividends. Expected volatility is based on the historical
volatility of our common stock over the period commensurate with
the expected life of the options and the historical implied
volatility from traded options with a term of 180 days or
greater. The risk-free interest rate is derived from the average
U.S. Treasury STRIPS rate during the period, which
approximates the rate in effect at the time of grant,
commensurate with the expected life of the instrument. We
estimate the expected term of options granted based on
historical exercise behavior.
Restricted
Awards
We are authorized to issue equity incentive awards in the form
of Restricted Awards, including Restricted Units and Restricted
Stock, which are individually discussed below. Unvested
Restricted Awards may not be sold, transferred or assigned. The
fair value of the Restricted Awards is measured based upon the
market price of the underlying common stock as of the date of
grant, reduced by the purchase price of $0.001 per share of the
awards. The Restricted Awards generally are subject to vesting
over a period of two to four years, and may have opportunities
for acceleration for achievement of defined goals. We also
issued certain Restricted Awards with vesting solely dependent
on the achievement of specified performance targets. The fair
value of the Restricted Awards is amortized to expense over the
awards applicable requisite service periods using the
straight-line method. In the event that the employees
employment with the Company terminates, or in the case of awards
with only performance goals, if those goals are not met, any
unvested shares are forfeited and revert to the Company.
95
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Restricted Units are not included in issued and outstanding
common stock until the shares are vested and released. The table
below summarizes activity relating to Restricted Units:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
Restricted Units
|
|
|
|
Restricted Units
|
|
|
Time-Based
|
|
|
|
Contingent Awards
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
Outstanding at October 1, 2007
|
|
|
729,417
|
|
|
|
6,079,383
|
|
Assumed in acquisition of eScription
|
|
|
367,253
|
|
|
|
438,791
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,543,365
|
|
|
|
3,812,617
|
|
Earned/released
|
|
|
(199,208
|
)
|
|
|
(2,866,528
|
)
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(26,303
|
)
|
|
|
(606,739
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2008
|
|
|
2,414,524
|
|
|
|
6,857,524
|
|
Assumed in acquisition of SNAPin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
299,446
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,292,617
|
|
|
|
5,392,361
|
|
Earned/released
|
|
|
(291,450
|
)
|
|
|
(2,865,505
|
)
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(575,018
|
)
|
|
|
(928,496
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2009
|
|
|
2,840,673
|
|
|
|
8,755,330
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,698,743
|
|
|
|
4,693,440
|
|
Earned/released
|
|
|
(950,253
|
)
|
|
|
(4,800,175
|
)
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(721,323
|
)
|
|
|
(853,481
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2010
|
|
|
2,867,840
|
|
|
|
7,795,114
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average remaining contractual term of outstanding
Restricted Units
|
|
|
0.8 years
|
|
|
|
1.3 years
|
|
Aggregate intrinsic value of outstanding Restricted Units(1)
|
|
$
|
44.9 million
|
|
|
$
|
121.9 million
|
|
Restricted Units vested and expected to vest
|
|
|
2,660,986
|
|
|
|
7,152,809
|
|
Weighted average remaining contractual term of Restricted Units
vested and expected to vest
|
|
|
0.8 years
|
|
|
|
1.3 years
|
|
Aggregate intrinsic value of Restricted Units vested and
expected to vest(1)
|
|
$
|
41.6 million
|
|
|
$
|
111.9 million
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The aggregate intrinsic value on this table was calculated based
on the positive difference between the closing market value of
our common stock on September 30, 2010 ($15.64) and the
exercise price of the underlying Restricted Units. |
The purchase price for vested Restricted Units is $0.001 per
share. As of September 30, 2010, unearned stock-based
compensation expense related to all unvested Restricted Units is
$117.2 million, which will, based on expectations of future
performance vesting criteria, where applicable, be recognized
over a weighted-average period of 1.7 years.
A summary of weighted-average grant-date fair value, including
those assumed in respective periods, and intrinsic value of all
Restricted Units vested is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
Weighted-average grant-date fair value per share
|
|
$
|
13.15
|
|
|
$
|
11.39
|
|
|
$
|
18.01
|
|
Total intrinsic value of shares vested (in millions)
|
|
$
|
91.3
|
|
|
$
|
33.3
|
|
|
$
|
55.5
|
|
96
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Restricted Stock is included in the issued and outstanding
common stock in these financial statements at date of grant.
There were no new grants of restricted stock in fiscal 2010 or
2009 and all shares were fully vested at September 30,
2009. The table below summarizes activity relating to Restricted
Stock for fiscal 2008 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
Average Grant
|
|
|
|
Restricted
|
|
|
Date Fair
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Outstanding at October 1, 2007
|
|
|
1,195,902
|
|
|
$
|
6.17
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
$
|
15.89
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(820,832
|
)
|
|
$
|
5.53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2008
|
|
|
625,070
|
|
|
$
|
10.90
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(625,070
|
)
|
|
$
|
10.90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The purchase price for vested Restricted Stock is $0.001 per
share. A summary of weighted-average grant-date fair value and
intrinsic value of Restricted Stock vested are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
Weighted-average grant-date fair value per share
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
15.89
|
|
Total intrinsic value of shares vested (in millions)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
8.65
|
|
|
$
|
16.85
|
|
In order to satisfy our employees withholding tax
liability as a result of the vesting of Restricted Stock, we
have historically repurchased shares upon the employees
vesting. Similarly, in order to satisfy our employees
withholding tax liability as a result of the release of our
employees Restricted Units, including units released
related to acquisitions, we have historically cancelled a
portion of the common stock upon the release. In fiscal 2010, we
withheld payroll taxes totaling $26.5 million
($22.0 million of cash paid) relating to 1.7 million
shares of common stock that were repurchased or cancelled. Based
on our estimate of the Restricted Awards that will vest or be
released in fiscal 2011, and further assuming that one-third of
these Restricted Awards would be repurchased or cancelled to
satisfy the employees withholding tax liability (such
amount approximating the tax rate of our employees), we would
have an obligation to pay cash relating to approximately
1.9 million shares during fiscal 2011.
1995
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
Our 1995 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the Plan), as
amended and restated on January 29, 2010, authorizes the
issuance of a maximum of 10,000,000 shares of common stock
in semi-annual offerings to employees at a price equal to the
lower of 85% of the closing price on the applicable offering
commencement date or 85% of the closing price on the applicable
offering termination date. Stock-based compensation expense for
the employee stock purchase plan is recognized for the fair
value benefit accorded to participating employees. At
September 30, 2010, 4,596,836 shares were reserved for
future issuance. A summary of the weighted-average grant-date
fair value, shares issued and total stock-based compensation
expense recognized related to the Plan are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
Weighted-average grant-date fair value per share
|
|
$
|
3.80
|
|
|
$
|
3.49
|
|
|
$
|
5.09
|
|
Total shares issued (in millions)
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
Total stock-based compensation expense (in millions)
|
|
$
|
3.5
|
|
|
$
|
3.7
|
|
|
$
|
3.4
|
|
97
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The fair value of the purchase rights granted under this plan
was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model that uses the following weighted-average
assumptions, which were derived in a manner similar to those
discussed above relative to stock options:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
38.7
|
%
|
|
|
62.1
|
%
|
|
|
53.1
|
%
|
Average risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
Expected term (in years)
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
18.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
Operating
Leases
We have various operating leases for office space around the
world. In connection with many of our acquisitions, we assumed
facility lease obligations. Among these assumed obligations are
lease payments related to office locations that were vacated by
certain of the acquired companies prior to the acquisition date
(Note 13). Additionally, certain of our lease obligations
have been included in various restructuring charges
(Note 14). The following table outlines our gross future
minimum payments under all non-cancelable operating leases as of
September 30, 2010 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
Leases Under
|
|
|
Other Contractual
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending September 30,
|
|
Leases
|
|
|
Restructuring
|
|
|
Obligations Assumed
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
21,020
|
|
|
$
|
3,126
|
|
|
$
|
13,947
|
|
|
$
|
38,093
|
|
2012
|
|
|
19,403
|
|
|
|
1,942
|
|
|
|
12,299
|
|
|
|
33,644
|
|
2013
|
|
|
17,401
|
|
|
|
932
|
|
|
|
2,323
|
|
|
|
20,656
|
|
2014
|
|
|
14,667
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,326
|
|
|
|
16,993
|
|
2015
|
|
|
14,094
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,329
|
|
|
|
16,423
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
33,013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
965
|
|
|
|
33,978
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
119,598
|
|
|
$
|
6,000
|
|
|
$
|
34,189
|
|
|
$
|
159,787
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2010, we have subleased certain office
space that is included in the above table to third parties.
Total sublease income under contractual terms is
$13.7 million and ranges from approximately
$1.3 million to $4.3 million on an annual basis
through February 2016.
Total rent expense charged to operations was approximately
$20.5 million, $19.6 million and $15.2 million
for the years ended September 30, 2010, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
Litigation
and Other Claims
Like many companies in the software industry, we have, from time
to time, been notified of claims that we may be infringing, or
contributing to the infringement of, the intellectual property
rights of others. These claims have been referred to counsel,
and they are in various stages of evaluation and negotiation. If
it appears necessary or desirable, we may seek licenses for
these intellectual property rights. There is no assurance that
licenses will be offered by all claimants, that the terms of any
offered licenses will be acceptable to us or that in all cases
the dispute will be resolved without litigation, which may be
time consuming and expensive, and may result in injunctive
relief or the payment of damages by us.
Vianix LLC has filed three legal actions against us, consisting
of two breach of contract actions and a copyright infringement
claim. We believe that our maximum potential exposure,
specifically related to one of the breach of contract actions
and the copyright infringement claim, is immaterial. It is too
early for us to reach a conclusion as to
98
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
the ultimate outcome or proposed settlement of these actions, or
to estimate the potential loss that could result from a
settlement or adverse judgment against us in the second breach
of contact action. We have not accrued any settlement liability
for these actions.
We do not believe that the final outcome of the above litigation
matters will have a material adverse effect on our financial
position and results of operations. However, even if our defense
is successful, the litigation could require significant
management time and will be costly. Should we not prevail, our
operating results, financial position and cash flows could be
adversely impacted.
Guarantees
and Other
We include indemnification provisions in the contracts we enter
into with customers and business partners. Generally, these
provisions require us to defend claims arising out of our
products infringement of third-party intellectual property
rights, breach of contractual obligations
and/or
unlawful or otherwise culpable conduct. The indemnity
obligations generally cover damages, costs and attorneys
fees arising out of such claims. In most, but not all, cases,
our total liability under such provisions is limited to either
the value of the contract or a specified, agreed upon amount. In
some cases our total liability under such provisions is
unlimited. In many, but not all, cases, the term of the
indemnity provision is perpetual. While the maximum potential
amount of future payments we could be required to make under all
the indemnification provisions is unlimited, we believe the
estimated fair value of these provisions is minimal due to the
low frequency with which these provisions have been triggered.
We indemnify our directors and officers to the fullest extent
permitted by law. These agreements, among other things,
indemnify directors and officers for expenses, judgments, fines,
penalties and settlement amounts incurred by such persons in
their capacity as a director or officer of the company,
regardless of whether the individual is serving in any such
capacity at the time the liability or expense is incurred.
Additionally, in connection with certain acquisitions we have
agreed to indemnify the former officers and members of the
boards of directors of those companies, on similar terms as
described above, for a period of six years from the acquisition
date. In certain cases we purchase director and officer
insurance policies related to these obligations, which fully
cover the six year periods. To the extent that we do not
purchase a director and officer insurance policy for the full
period of any contractual indemnification, we would be required
to pay for costs incurred, if any, as described above.
|
|
19.
|
Pension
and Other Post-Retirement Benefits
|
Defined
Contribution Plan
We have established a retirement savings plan under
Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code (the
401(k) Plan). The 401(k) Plan covers substantially
all of our U.S. employees who meet minimum age and service
requirements, and allows participants to defer a portion of
their annual compensation on a pre-tax basis. Effective
July 1, 2003, Company match of employees
contributions was established. We match 50% of employee
contributions up to 4% of eligible salary. Employees who were
hired prior to April 1, 2004 were 100% vested into the plan
as soon as they started to contribute to the plan. Employees
hired on or after April 1, 2004, vest one-third of the
contribution annually over a three-year period. Our
contributions to the 401(k) Plan totaled $3.3 million,
$3.2 million and $2.9 million for fiscal 2010, 2009
and 2008, respectively.
Defined
Benefit Pension Plans
In accordance with the provisions set forth in ASC 715, we
recognized the funded status, which is the difference between
the fair value of plan assets and the projected benefit
obligations, of our postretirement benefit plans in the
consolidated balance sheets with a corresponding adjustment to
accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax. These amounts
in accumulated other comprehensive loss will be subsequently
recognized as net periodic pension expense.
99
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
We assumed the assets and obligations related to certain
significant defined benefit pension plans in connection with our
acquisition of Dictaphone, which provide certain retirement and
death benefits for former Dictaphone employees located in the
United Kingdom and Canada. These two pension plans are closed to
new participants.
The following table shows the changes in fiscal 2010 and 2009 in
the projected benefit obligation, plan assets and funded status
of the defined benefit pension plans (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change in Benefit Obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
22,850
|
|
|
$
|
22,408
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
1,222
|
|
|
|
1,179
|
|
Actuarial loss
|
|
|
1,933
|
|
|
|
2,752
|
|
Currency exchange rate changes
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
(2,456
|
)
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(991
|
)
|
|
|
(1,033
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at end of period
|
|
|
25,067
|
|
|
|
22,850
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in Plan Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets, beginning of period
|
|
|
17,549
|
|
|
|
18,397
|
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
|
|
2,194
|
|
|
|
1,121
|
|
Employer contribution
|
|
|
843
|
|
|
|
958
|
|
Currency exchange rate changes
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
(1,894
|
)
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(991
|
)
|
|
|
(1,033
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets, end of period
|
|
|
19,750
|
|
|
|
17,549
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status at end of period
|
|
$
|
(5,317
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,301
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amounts recognized in our consolidated balance sheets
consisted of the following (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
$
|
506
|
|
|
$
|
1,124
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
(5,823
|
)
|
|
|
(6,425
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net liability recognized
|
|
$
|
(5,317
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,301
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss
as of September 30, 2010 consisted of the following
(dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
Actuarial loss recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
$
|
(4,855
|
)
|
The following represents the amounts included in accumulated
other comprehensive loss on the consolidated balance sheet as of
September 30, 2010 that we expect to recognize in earnings
during fiscal 2011 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Expense
|
|
Actuarial loss
|
|
$
|
(255
|
)
|
100
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The projected benefit obligations for the two defined benefit
pension plans was $25.1 million at September 30, 2010.
Included in the table below are the amounts relating to our UK
pension plan, which has accumulated benefit obligations and
projected benefit obligations in excess of plan assets (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Aggregate projected benefit obligations
|
|
$
|
21,939
|
|
|
$
|
19,967
|
|
Aggregate accumulated benefit obligations
|
|
|
21,939
|
|
|
|
19,967
|
|
Aggregate fair value of plan assets
|
|
|
16,117
|
|
|
|
13,542
|
|
The components of net periodic benefit cost of the pension plans
were as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
1,222
|
|
|
|
1,179
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(1,038
|
)
|
|
|
(1,058
|
)
|
Amortization of unrecognized loss
|
|
|
251
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic pension cost
|
|
$
|
440
|
|
|
$
|
168
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan
Assumptions:
Weighted-average assumptions used in developing the net periodic
benefit cost for the pension plans were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
|
|
6.1
|
%
|
Average compensation increase
|
|
|
N/A
|
(1)
|
|
|
N/A
|
(1)
|
Expected rate of return on plan assets
|
|
|
6.2
|
%
|
|
|
6.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Rate of compensation increase is not applicable as there are no
active members in the plan. |
The weighted average discount rate used in developing the
benefit obligations was 5.0% and 6.1% at September 30 2010 and
2009, respectively.
Asset
Allocation and Investment Strategy:
The percentages of the fair value of pension plan assets
actually allocated and targeted for allocation, by asset
category, at September 30, 2010 and September 30,
2009, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Target
|
|
Asset Category
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
54
|
%
|
|
|
62
|
%
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
|
58
|
%
|
Debt securities
|
|
|
46
|
%
|
|
|
38
|
%
|
|
|
60
|
%
|
|
|
42
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The plan administrators recently updated the asset allocation
targets to reflect changes in the participant population and the
expected period that future benefits will become payable. The
investments held by the plans will
101
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
be rebalanced during the next fiscal year to reflect this
updated target allocation. The weighted average expected
long-term rate of return for the plan assets is 6.2%. The
expected long-term rate of return on plan assets is determined
based on a variety of considerations, including established
asset allocation targets and expectations for those asset
classes, historical returns of the plans assets and other
market considerations. We invest our pension assets with the
objective of achieving a total rate of return, over the long
term, sufficient to fund future pension obligations and to
minimize future pension contribution requirements. All of the
assets are invested in funds offered to institutional investors
that are similar to mutual funds in that they provide
diversification by holding various debt and equity securities.
The fair value of total pension plan assets by major category at
September 30, 2010 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
$
|
10,728
|
|
Debt Securities
|
|
|
9,022
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total pension assets
|
|
|
19,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The assets are all invested in funds which are not quoted on any
active market and are valued based on the underlying debt and
equity investments and their individual prices at any given
time, and thus are classified as Level 2 within the fair
value hierarchy as defined in ASC 20 and described in
Note 12.
Employer
Contributions:
We expect to contribute $1.4 million to our pension plans
in fiscal 2011. Included in this contribution is a minimum
funding requirement associated with our UK pension which
requires an annual minimum payment of £859,900
(approximately $1.4 million based on the exchange rate at
September 30, 2010) for each year through fiscal 2014.
Estimated
Future Benefit Payments:
The following benefit payments, which reflect expected future
service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending September 30,
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
1,154
|
|
2012
|
|
|
1,175
|
|
2013
|
|
|
1,221
|
|
2014
|
|
|
1,242
|
|
2015
|
|
|
1,262
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
6,605
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
12,659
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The components of income (loss) before income taxes are as
follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
$
|
(15,543
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,549
|
)
|
|
$
|
(30,434
|
)
|
Foreign
|
|
|
14,478
|
|
|
|
22,553
|
|
|
|
8,028
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
$
|
(1,065
|
)
|
|
$
|
21,004
|
|
|
$
|
(22,406
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The components of the income tax provision (benefit) are as
follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
(1,634
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,119
|
|
|
$
|
1,048
|
|
State
|
|
|
2,484
|
|
|
|
5,439
|
|
|
|
10,782
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
13,442
|
|
|
|
8,115
|
|
|
|
2,233
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,292
|
|
|
|
14,673
|
|
|
|
14,063
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
7,052
|
|
|
|
14,952
|
|
|
|
20,177
|
|
State
|
|
|
942
|
|
|
|
12,740
|
|
|
|
(20,796
|
)
|
Foreign
|
|
|
(4,252
|
)
|
|
|
(1,974
|
)
|
|
|
1,110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,742
|
|
|
|
25,718
|
|
|
|
491
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
$
|
18,034
|
|
|
$
|
40,391
|
|
|
$
|
14,554
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A reconciliation of our effective tax rate to the statutory
federal rate is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Federal statutory tax rate
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
(298.9
|
)
|
|
|
17.5
|
|
|
|
(30.1
|
)
|
Foreign taxes
|
|
|
(228.4
|
)
|
|
|
(6.2
|
)
|
|
|
(13.8
|
)
|
Foreign benefit refundable credits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24.9
|
|
State tax, net of federal benefit
|
|
|
(287.1
|
)
|
|
|
25.3
|
|
|
|
(48.2
|
)
|
State tax law enactment, net of federal benefit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39.9
|
|
|
|
131.6
|
|
Nondeductible expenditures
|
|
|
(47.8
|
)
|
|
|
8.8
|
|
|
|
(9.3
|
)
|
Change in valuation allowance
|
|
|
(958.8
|
)
|
|
|
62.5
|
|
|
|
(163.4
|
)
|
Executive compensation
|
|
|
(381.4
|
)
|
|
|
7.6
|
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
Federal credits, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
Other
|
|
|
474.1
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective income tax rate
|
|
|
(1,693.3
|
)%
|
|
|
192.3
|
%
|
|
|
(65.0
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During fiscal 2010, tax benefits were recorded for the favorable
settlements of a $1.1 million U.S. federal tax audit
contingency related to our acquisition of eCopy and a
$1.0 million state tax penalty contingency related to our
acquisition of escription. Additionally, we recorded a
$1.1 million U.S. federal tax benefit related to
certain tax loss
103
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
carrybacks resulting from a tax law change and a
$1.1 million tax benefit resulting from certain
international research and development credits.
During fiscal 2009, the tax provision includes a charge of
$8.0 million related to our election to treat the
eScription acquisition as an asset purchase. Also included in
the fiscal 2009 tax provision is a charge of $3.2 million
as a result of the Massachusetts state tax law enactment
relating to the utilization of net operating losses.
The cumulative amount of undistributed earnings of our foreign
subsidiaries amounted to $77.0 million at
September 30, 2010. We have not provided any additional
federal or state income taxes or foreign withholding taxes on
the undistributed earnings, as such earnings have been
indefinitely reinvested in the business. An estimate of the tax
consequences from the repatriation of these earnings is not
practicable at this time resulting from the complexities of the
utilization of foreign tax credits and other tax assets.
Deferred tax assets (liabilities) consist of the following at
September 30, 2010 and 2009 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating loss carryforwards
|
|
$
|
268,882
|
|
|
$
|
225,660
|
|
Federal and state credit carryforwards
|
|
|
22,768
|
|
|
|
19,241
|
|
Capitalized research and development costs
|
|
|
23,673
|
|
|
|
26,351
|
|
Accrued expenses and other reserves
|
|
|
55,385
|
|
|
|
51,315
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
25,090
|
|
|
|
14,490
|
|
Deferred compensation
|
|
|
18,952
|
|
|
|
18,335
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,955
|
|
Other
|
|
|
6,205
|
|
|
|
8,712
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
|
|
420,955
|
|
|
|
367,059
|
|
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets
|
|
|
(297,513
|
)
|
|
|
(224,597
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets
|
|
|
123,442
|
|
|
|
142,462
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
(1,900
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible debt
|
|
|
(12,120
|
)
|
|
|
(15,131
|
)
|
Acquired intangibles
|
|
|
(170,022
|
)
|
|
|
(180,148
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax liabilities
|
|
$
|
(60,600
|
)
|
|
$
|
(52,817
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported as:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current deferred tax assets(a)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,394
|
|
Long-term deferred tax assets(b)
|
|
|
3,131
|
|
|
|
3,749
|
|
Current deferred tax liabilities(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,614
|
)
|
Long-term deferred tax liability(d)
|
|
|
(63,731
|
)
|
|
|
(56,346
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax liabilities
|
|
$
|
(60,600
|
)
|
|
$
|
(52,817
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Included in prepaid expenses and other current assets in the
consolidated balance sheets. |
|
(b) |
|
Included in other assets in the consolidated balance sheets. |
|
(c) |
|
Included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities in
the consolidated balance sheets. |
|
(d) |
|
Included in deferred tax liability in the consolidated balance
sheets. |
104
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
As of September 30, 2010, our valuation allowance for
U.S. net deferred tax assets totaled $186.2 million,
which consists of $192.5 million in beginning allowance,
plus a $3.7 million increase to income tax provision due to
increases in net deferred tax assets in fiscal 2010, a
$9.5 million increase in valuation allowance resulting from
goodwill and acquisition related adjustments and a
$19.5 million decrease for an adjustment to the underlying
deferred tax carrying balances.. A portion of the deferred tax
liabilities are created resulting from the different treatment
of goodwill for book and tax purposes which cannot offset
deferred tax assets in determining the valuation allowance. As
of September 30, 2010, our valuation allowance for foreign
deferred tax assets totaled $111.3 million, which consists
of $32.0 million in beginning allowance, plus a
$6.7 million increase to income tax provision due to
increases in net deferred tax assets in fiscal 2010 and a
$72.6 million increase in valuation allowance resulting
from goodwill and acquisition related adjustments.
As of September 30, 2010 and 2009, $240.1 million and
$164.3 million, respectively, of our valuation allowance is
associated with tax assets arising from business combinations.
When and if any of this valuation allowance is released, it will
be recorded as a benefit in the statement of operations.
At September 30, 2010 and 2009, we had U.S. federal
net operating loss carryforwards of $579.1 million and
$600.6 million, respectively, of which $210.0 million
and $186.7 million, respectively, relate to tax deductions
from stock-based compensation which will be recorded as
additional
paid-in-capital
when realized. At September 30, 2010 and 2009, we had state
net operating loss carryforwards of $203.5 million and
$170.2 million, respectively. The net operating loss and
credit carryforwards are subject to an annual limitation due to
the ownership change limitations provided by the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986 and similar state tax provisions. At
September 30, 2010 and 2009, we had foreign net operating
loss carryforwards of $427.0 million and
$127.3 million, respectively. These carryforwards will
expire at various dates beginning in 2010 and extending through
2029, if not utilized.
At September 30, 2010 and 2009, we had federal research and
development carryforwards of $15.2 million and
$13.0 million, respectively. At September 30, 2010 and
2009, we had state research and development credit carryforwards
of $5.9 million and $6.9 million, respectively.
Uncertain
Tax Positions
Effective October 1, 2007, we adopted the provisions of
ASC 740-10
(formerly referred to as FASB Interpretation No. 48
(FIN 48)), and we began establishing reserves
for tax uncertainties that reflect the use of the comprehensive
model for the recognition and measurement of uncertain tax
positions. Under the comprehensive model, reserves are
established when we have determined that it is more likely than
not that a tax position will or will not be sustained and at the
greatest amount for which the result is more likely than not. As
a result of the adoption of
ASC 740-10,
during fiscal 2008, we recognized an adjustment of
$0.9 million in our liability for unrecognized tax
benefits. We include interest and penalties related to
unrecognized tax benefits within the provision for income taxes.
The aggregate changes in the balance of our gross unrecognized
tax benefits were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of year
|
|
$
|
12.1
|
|
|
$
|
2.7
|
|
Increases for tax positions taken during current period
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Increases for interest charges
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
Increases for acquisitions
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
Decreases for tax settlements
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, at end of year
|
|
$
|
12.8
|
|
|
$
|
12.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
As of September 30, 2010, $12.8 million of the
unrecognized tax benefits, if recognized, would affect our
effective tax rate. We do not expect a significant change in the
amount of unrecognized tax benefits within the next
12 months. We recognized interest and penalties related to
uncertain tax positions in our provision for income taxes and
had accrued $1.7 million of such interest and penalties as
of September 30, 2010.
We are subject to U.S. federal income tax, various state
and local taxes, and international income taxes in numerous
jurisdictions. The federal, state and foreign tax returns are
generally subject to tax examinations for the tax years ended in
2007 through 2010.
|
|
21.
|
Segment
and Geographic Information and Significant Customers
|
We follow the provisions of ASC 280 (formerly referred to
as SFAS No. 131, Disclosures About Segments of an
Enterprise and Related Information), which establishes
standards for reporting information about operating segments.
ASC 280 also established standards for disclosures about
products, services and geographic areas. Operating segments are
defined as components of an enterprise for which separate
financial information is available and evaluated regularly by
the chief operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate
resources and in assessing performance. Our chief operating
decision maker (CODM) is the Chief Executive Officer
of the Company.
We have several customer-facing market groups that oversee the
core markets where we conduct business. These groups are
referred to as Healthcare, Mobile and Consumer, Enterprise and
Imaging. These groups do not directly manage centralized or
shared resources or the allocation decisions regarding the
activities related to these functions, which include sales and
sales operations, certain research and development initiatives,
business development and all general and administrative
activities. Our CODM oversees these groups as well as each of
the functions that provide the shared and centralized activities
noted above. To manage the business, allocate resources and
assess performance, the CODM primarily reviews revenue data by
market group, while reviewing gross margins, operating margins,
and other measures of income or loss on a consolidated basis.
Thus, we have determined that we operate in one segment.
The following table presents revenue information for our four
core markets (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Healthcare
|
|
$
|
444,593
|
|
|
$
|
369,406
|
|
|
$
|
289,194
|
|
Mobile and Consumer
|
|
|
297,335
|
|
|
|
209,128
|
|
|
|
243,601
|
|
Enterprise
|
|
|
293,940
|
|
|
|
302,155
|
|
|
|
255,734
|
|
Imaging
|
|
|
83,080
|
|
|
|
69,663
|
|
|
|
79,933
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenue
|
|
$
|
1,118,948
|
|
|
$
|
950,352
|
|
|
$
|
868,462
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No country outside of the United States provided greater than
10% of our total revenue. Revenue, classified by the major
geographic areas in which our customers are located, was as
follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
802,049
|
|
|
$
|
706,858
|
|
|
$
|
669,239
|
|
International
|
|
|
316,899
|
|
|
|
243,494
|
|
|
|
199,223
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,118,948
|
|
|
$
|
950,352
|
|
|
$
|
868,462
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
No country outside of the United States held greater than 10% of
our long-lived or total assets. Our long-lived assets, including
intangible assets and goodwill, were located as follows (dollars
in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
2,479,952
|
|
|
$
|
2,395,923
|
|
International
|
|
|
448,105
|
|
|
|
307,864
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,928,057
|
|
|
$
|
2,703,787
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A member of our Board of Directors is also a partner at Wilson
Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, Professional Corporation, a
law firm that provides professional services to us. These
services may from
time-to-time
include contingent fee arrangements. We paid Wilson Sonsini
Goodrich & Rosati $3.4 million, $8.7 million
and $13.1 million for fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008,
respectively for professional services. As of September 30,
2010 and 2009, we had $1.4 million and $1.7 million,
respectively, included in accounts payable and accrued expenses
to Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati.
|
|
23.
|
Quarterly
Data (Unaudited)
|
The following information has been derived from unaudited
consolidated financial statements that, in the opinion of
management, include all recurring adjustments necessary for a
fair statement of such information (in thousands, except per
share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
Second
|
|
Third
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
Quarter
|
|
Quarter
|
|
Quarter
|
|
Year
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
$
|
262,977
|
|
|
$
|
273,005
|
|
|
$
|
273,203
|
|
|
$
|
309,763
|
|
|
$
|
1,118,948
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
$
|
169,382
|
|
|
$
|
169,405
|
|
|
$
|
171,425
|
|
|
$
|
199,366
|
|
|
$
|
709,578
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(4,278
|
)
|
|
$
|
(15,396
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,530
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,105
|
|
|
$
|
(19,099
|
)
|
Net income (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
279,068
|
|
|
|
284,994
|
|
|
|
291,610
|
|
|
|
293,971
|
|
|
|
287,412
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
279,068
|
|
|
|
284,994
|
|
|
|
291,610
|
|
|
|
307,382
|
|
|
|
287,412
|
|
107
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
Second
|
|
Third
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
Quarter
|
|
Quarter
|
|
Quarter
|
|
Year
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
$
|
216,834
|
|
|
$
|
229,145
|
|
|
$
|
241,040
|
|
|
$
|
263,333
|
|
|
$
|
950,352
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
$
|
134,534
|
|
|
$
|
140,767
|
|
|
$
|
147,081
|
|
|
$
|
168,419
|
|
|
$
|
590,801
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(26,318
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,280
|
|
|
$
|
(2,815
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,466
|
|
|
$
|
(19,387
|
)
|
Net income (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
$
|
(0.08
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
$
|
(0.08
|
)
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
236,237
|
|
|
|
250,656
|
|
|
|
260,750
|
|
|
|
266,932
|
|
|
|
253,644
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
236,237
|
|
|
|
269,187
|
|
|
|
260,750
|
|
|
|
285,948
|
|
|
|
253,644
|
|
108
|
|
Item 9.
|
Changes
in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
|
Not applicable.
|
|
Item 9A.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
Disclosure
Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the
effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures. Our
disclosure controls and procedures are designed (i) to
ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the
reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is
recorded, processed and summarized and reported within the time
periods specified in the SECs rules and forms and
(ii) to ensure that information required to be disclosed in
the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is
accumulated and communicated to our management, including our
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow
timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on that
evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer concluded that, as of September 30, 2010, our
disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
Management
Report on Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined
in
Rules 13a-15(f)
and
15d-15(f)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Our
internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external reporting purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles. Our internal control over
financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:
|
|
|
|
|
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable
detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and
dispositions of our assets;
|
|
|
|
provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as
necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and
that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in
accordance with authorizations of our management and directors;
and,
|
|
|
|
provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our
assets that could have a material effect on the financial
statements.
|
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions and that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management has assessed the effectiveness of our internal
control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2010,
utilizing the criteria set forth in Internal
Control Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO). The internal controls over financial
reporting for SpinVox Limited, which we acquired on
December 30, 2009, were excluded from managements
assessment. SpinVox Limited constituted approximately 0.6% of
our consolidated assets as of September 30, 2010 and
approximately 2.2% of our consolidated revenue for the fiscal
year ended September 30, 2010. Based on the results of this
assessment, management (including our Chief Executive Officer
and our Chief Financial Officer) has concluded that, as of
September 30, 2010, our internal control over financial
reporting was effective.
The attestation report concerning the effectiveness of our
internal control over financial reporting as of
September 30, 2010 issued by BDO USA, LLP, an independent
registered public accounting firm, appears in Item 8 of
this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
109
Changes
in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in our internal controls over
financial reporting during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010
that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal controls over financial
reporting.
|
|
Item 9B.
|
Other
Information
|
None.
PART III
Certain information required by Part III is omitted from
this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
since we intend to file our definitive Proxy Statement for our
next Annual Meeting of Stockholders, pursuant to
Regulation 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the Proxy Statement), within 120 days
of the end of the fiscal year covered by this report, and
certain information to be included in the Proxy Statement is
incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
Item 10.
|
Directors,
Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
|
The information required by this item concerning our directors
is incorporated by reference to the information set forth in the
section titled Election of Directors in our Proxy
Statement. Information required by this item concerning our
executive officers is incorporated by reference to the
information set forth in the section entitled Executive
Compensation, Management and Other Information in our
Proxy Statement. Information regarding Section 16 reporting
compliance is incorporated by reference to the information set
forth in the section entitled Section 16(a)
Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance in our Proxy
Statement.
Our Board of Directors adopted a Code of Business Conduct and
Ethics for all of our directors, officers and employees on
February 24, 2004. Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
can be found at our website: www.nuance.com. We will provide to
any person without charge, upon request, a copy of our Code of
Business Conduct and Ethics. Such a request should be made in
writing and addressed to Investor Relations, Nuance
Communications, Inc., 1 Wayside Road, Burlington, MA 01803.
To date, there have been no waivers under our Code of Business
Conduct and Ethics. We will post any waivers, if and when
granted, of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics on our
website at www.nuance.com.
|
|
Item 11.
|
Executive
Compensation
|
The information required by this item regarding executive
compensation is incorporated by reference to the information set
forth in the section titled Executive Compensation,
Management and Other Information in our Proxy Statement.
|
|
Item 12.
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and
Related Stockholders Matters
|
The information required by this item regarding security
ownership of certain beneficial owners and management is
incorporated by reference to the information set forth in the
sections titled Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial
Owners and Management and Equity Compensation
Plans in our Proxy Statement.
|
|
Item 13.
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director
Independence
|
It is the policy of the Board that all transactions required to
be reported pursuant to Item 404 of
Regulation S-K
be subject to approval by the Audit Committee of the Board. In
furtherance of relevant NASDAQ rules and our commitment to
corporate governance, the charter of the Audit Committee
provides that the Audit Committee shall review and approve any
proposed related party transactions including, transactions
required to be reported pursuant to Item 404 of
Regulation S-K
for potential conflict of interest situations. The Audit
Committee reviews the material facts of all transactions that
require the committees approval and either approves or
disapproves of the
110
transaction. In determining whether to approve a transaction,
the Audit Committee will take into account, among other factors
it deems appropriate, whether the transaction is on terms no
less favorable than terms generally available to an unaffiliated
third-party under the same or similar circumstances.
The additional information required by this item regarding
certain relationships and related party transactions is
incorporated by reference to the information set forth in the
sections titled Related Party Transactions and
Director Independence in our Proxy Statement.
|
|
Item 14.
|
Principal
Accountant Fees and Services
|
The information required by this section is incorporated by
reference from the information in the section entitled
Ratification of Appointment of Independent Auditors
in our Proxy Statement.
PART IV
|
|
Item 15.
|
Exhibits
and Financial Statement Schedules
|
(a) The following documents are filed as a part of this
Report:
(1) Financial Statements See Index to Financial
Statements in Item 8 of this Report.
(2) Financial Statement Schedules All schedules
have been omitted as the requested information is inapplicable
or the information is presented in the financial statements or
related notes included as part of this Report.
(3) Exhibits See Item 15(b) of this Report
below.
(b) Exhibits.
111
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.
NUANCE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Paul A. Ricci
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
has been signed by the following persons in the capacities and
on the dates indicated.
|
|
|
Date: November 29, 2010
|
|
/s/ Paul A. Ricci
Paul
A. Ricci, Chief Executive Officer and
Chairman of the Board
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
|
|
Date: November 29, 2010
|
|
/s/ Thomas L. Beaudoin
Thomas
L. Beaudoin, Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
|
|
|
|
Date: November 29, 2010
|
|
/s/ Daniel D. Tempesta
Daniel
D. Tempesta, Chief Accounting Officer and
Corporate Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer)
|
|
|
|
Date: November 29, 2010
|
|
/s/ Robert J. Frankenberg
Robert
J. Frankenberg, Director
|
|
|
|
Date: November 29, 2010
|
|
/s/ Patrick T. Hackett
Patrick
T. Hackett, Director
|
|
|
|
Date: November 29, 2010
|
|
/s/ William H. Janeway
William
H. Janeway, Director
|
|
|
|
Date: November 29, 2010
|
|
/s/ Mark R. Laret
Mark
R. Laret, Director
|
|
|
|
Date: November 29, 2010
|
|
/s/ Katharine A. Martin
Katharine
A. Martin, Director
|
|
|
|
Date: November 29, 2010
|
|
/s/ Mark Myers
Mark
Myers, Director
|
|
|
|
Date: November 29, 2010
|
|
/s/ Philip Quigley
Philip
Quigley, Director
|
|
|
|
Date: November 29, 2010
|
|
/s/ Robert G. Teresi
Robert
G. Teresi, Director
|
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Filing
|
|
Filed
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit Description
|
|
Form
|
|
File No.
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
Date
|
|
Herewith
|
|
|
2
|
.1
|
|
Agreement for the acquisition of the entire issued share capital
of SpinVox Limited, the substitution of Foxtrot Acquisition
Limited as the issuer of a debt instrument issued by SpinVox
Limited, and the release and cancellation of such debt
instrument in consideration of shares in Foxtrot Acquisition
Limited dated December 29, 2009
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-27038
|
|
2.1
|
|
1/5/2010
|
|
|
|
2
|
.2
|
|
Agreement for the acquisition of shares in Foxtrot Acquisition
Limited and the payment of certain sums to the Mezzanine Lenders
and other parties dated December 29, 2009
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-27038
|
|
2.2
|
|
1/5/2010
|
|
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the
Registrant.
|
|
10-Q
|
|
0-27038
|
|
3.2
|
|
5/11/2001
|
|
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Certificate of Amendment of the Amended and Restated Certificate
of Incorporation of the Registrant.
|
|
10-Q
|
|
0-27038
|
|
3.1
|
|
8/9/2004
|
|
|
|
3
|
.3
|
|
Certificate of Ownership and Merger.
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-27038
|
|
3.1
|
|
10/19/2005
|
|
|
|
3
|
.4
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant.
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-27038
|
|
3.1
|
|
11/13/2007
|
|
|
|
3
|
.5
|
|
Certificate of Amendment of the Amended and Restated Certificate
of Incorporation of the Registrant, as amended.
|
|
S-3
|
|
333-142182
|
|
3.3
|
|
4/18/2007
|
|
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Specimen Common Stock Certificate.
|
|
8-A
|
|
0-27038
|
|
4.1
|
|
12/6/1995
|
|
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
Common Stock Purchase Warrant.
|
|
S-4
|
|
333-70603
|
|
Annex A
|
|
1/14/1999
|
|
|
|
4
|
.3
|
|
Common Stock Purchase Warrants, dated March 15, 2004,
issued to Warburg Pincus Private Equity VIII, L.P., Warburg
Pincus Netherlands Private Equity VIII I C.V., Warburg Pincus
Netherlands Private Equity VIII II C.V., and Warburg Pincus
Germany Private Equity VIII K.G.
|
|
10-Q
|
|
0-27038
|
|
4.3
|
|
5/10/2004
|
|
|
|
4
|
.4
|
|
Common Stock Purchase Warrants, dated May 9, 2005, issued
to Warburg Pincus Private Equity VIII, L.P., Warburg Pincus
Netherlands Private Equity VIII I C.V., and Warburg Pincus
Germany Private Equity VIII K.G.
|
|
S-4
|
|
333-125496
|
|
4.11
|
|
6/3/2005
|
|
|
|
4
|
.5
|
|
Indenture, dated as of August 13, 2007, between Nuance
Communications, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association, as
Trustee (including form of 2.75% Convertible Subordinated
Debentures due 2027).
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-27038
|
|
4.1
|
|
8/17/2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Filing
|
|
Filed
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit Description
|
|
Form
|
|
File No.
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
Date
|
|
Herewith
|
|
|
4
|
.6
|
|
Purchase Agreement, dated as of April 7, 2008 by and among
Nuance Communications, Inc. and the Purchasers identified on
Exhibit A (Warburg Pincus Private Equity VIII, L.P.,
Warburg Pincus Netherlands Private Equity VIII, C.V.I., WP-WP
VIII Investors, L.P.).
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-27038
|
|
2.2
|
|
4/11/2008
|
|
|
|
4
|
.7
|
|
Purchase Agreement, dated as of January 13, 2009, by and
among Nuance Communications, Inc. and the Purchasers identified
on Exhibit A (Warburg Pincus Private Equity X, L.P. and
Warburg Pincus X Partners, L.P.).
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-27038
|
|
2.1
|
|
1/16/2009
|
|
|
|
4
|
.8
|
|
Third Amended and Restated Stockholders Agreement, dated as of
January 29, 2009, by and among Nuance Communications, Inc.,
Warburg Pincus Private Equity VIII, L.P., Warburg Pincus
Netherlands Private Equity VIII C.V. I, and WP-WPVIII
Investors, L.P., Warburg Pincus Private Equity X, L.P. and
Warburg Pincus X Partners, L.P.
|
|
10-Q
|
|
0-27038
|
|
4.1
|
|
2/9/2009
|
|
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement.
|
|
S-8
|
|
333-108767
|
|
10.1
|
|
9/12/2003
|
|
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
Stand Alone Stock Option Agreement Number 1, dated as of
August 21, 2000, by and between the Registrant and Paul A.
Ricci.*
|
|
S-8
|
|
333-49656
|
|
4.3
|
|
11/9/2000
|
|
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
Caere Corporation 1992 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option
Plan.*
|
|
S-8
|
|
333-33464
|
|
10.4
|
|
3/29/2000
|
|
|
|
10
|
.4
|
|
1993 Incentive Stock Option Plan, as amended.*
|
|
S-1
|
|
333-100647
|
|
10.17
|
|
10/21/2002
|
|
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
1995 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended and restated on
April 27, 2000.*
|
|
14A
|
|
0-27038
|
|
Annex D
|
|
4/13/2004
|
|
|
|
10
|
.6
|
|
Amended and Restated 1995 Directors Stock Option
Plan, as amended.*
|
|
14A
|
|
0-27038
|
|
10.2
|
|
3/17/2005
|
|
|
|
10
|
.7
|
|
1997 Employee Stock Option Plan, as amended.*
|
|
S-1
|
|
333-100647
|
|
10.19
|
|
10/21/2002
|
|
|
|
10
|
.8
|
|
1998 Stock Option Plan.*
|
|
S-8
|
|
333-74343
|
|
99.1
|
|
3/12/1999
|
|
|
|
10
|
.9
|
|
Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Option Plan.*
|
|
14A
|
|
0-27038
|
|
10.1
|
|
3/17/2005
|
|
|
|
10
|
.10
|
|
2000 NonStatutory Stock Option Plan, as amended.*
|
|
S-8
|
|
333-108767
|
|
4.1
|
|
9/12/2003
|
|
|
|
10
|
.11
|
|
ScanSoft 2003 Stock Plan.*
|
|
S-8
|
|
333-108767
|
|
4.3
|
|
9/12/2003
|
|
|
|
10
|
.12
|
|
Nuance Communications, Inc. 2001 Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan.*
|
|
S-8
|
|
333-128396
|
|
4.1
|
|
9/16/2005
|
|
|
|
10
|
.13
|
|
Nuance Communications, Inc. 2000 Stock Plan.*
|
|
S-8
|
|
333-128396
|
|
4.2
|
|
9/16/2005
|
|
|
|
10
|
.14
|
|
Nuance Communications, Inc. 1998 Stock Plan.*
|
|
S-8
|
|
333-128396
|
|
4.3
|
|
9/16/2005
|
|
|
|
10
|
.15
|
|
Nuance Communications, Inc. 1994 Flexible Stock Incentive Plan.*
|
|
S-8
|
|
333-128396
|
|
4.4
|
|
9/16/2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Filing
|
|
Filed
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit Description
|
|
Form
|
|
File No.
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
Date
|
|
Herewith
|
|
|
10
|
.16
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Purchase Agreement.*
|
|
10-K/A
|
|
0-27038
|
|
10.17
|
|
12/15/2006
|
|
|
|
10
|
.17
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Purchase Agreement.*
|
|
10-K/A
|
|
0-27038
|
|
10.18
|
|
12/15/2006
|
|
|
|
10
|
.18
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement.*
|
|
10-K/A
|
|
0-27038
|
|
10.19
|
|
12/15/2006
|
|
|
|
10
|
.19
|
|
2005 Severance Benefit Plan for Executive Officers.*
|
|
10-Q
|
|
0-27038
|
|
10.1
|
|
5/10/2005
|
|
|
|
10
|
.20
|
|
Officer Short-term Disability Plan.*
|
|
10-Q
|
|
0-27038
|
|
10.2
|
|
5/10/2005
|
|
|
|
10
|
.21
|
|
Technology Transfer and License Agreement, dated as of
January 30, 2003, between Koninklijke Philips Electronics
N.V. and the Registrant.
|
|
S-1/A
|
|
333-100647
|
|
10.30
|
|
2/7/2003
|
|
|
|
10
|
.22
|
|
Letter, dated February 17, 2003, from the Registrant to
Jeanne McCann regarding certain employment matters.*
|
|
10-Q
|
|
0-27038
|
|
10.1
|
|
5/15/2003
|
|
|
|
10
|
.23
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated March 9, 2004, by and between
the Registrant and John Shagoury.*
|
|
10-Q
|
|
0-27038
|
|
10.1
|
|
8/9/2004
|
|
|
|
10
|
.24
|
|
Letter, dated May 23, 2004, from the Registrant to Steven
Chambers regarding certain employment matters.*
|
|
10-Q
|
|
0-27038
|
|
10.2
|
|
8/9/2004
|
|
|
|
10
|
.25
|
|
Letter dated September 25, 2006, from the Registrant to Don
Hunt regarding certain employment matters.
|
|
10-K/A
|
|
0-27038
|
|
10.29
|
|
12/15/2006
|
|
|
|
10
|
.26
|
|
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of April 5,
2007, among Nuance Communications, Inc., the Lenders party
thereto from time to time, UBS AG, Stamford Branch, as
administrative agent, Citicorp North America, Inc., as
syndication agent, Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, as
documentation agent, Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and UBS
Securities LLC, as joint lead arrangers, Credit Suisse
Securities (USA) LLC and Banc Of America Securities LLC, as
co-arrangers, and Citigroup Global Markets INC., UBS Securities
LLC and Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, as joint bookrunners.
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-27038
|
|
10.1
|
|
4/11/2007
|
|
|
|
10
|
.27
|
|
Amendment Agreement, dated as of April 5, 2007, among
Nuance, UBS AG, Stamford Branch, as administrative agent,
Citicorp North America, INC., as syndication agent, Credit
Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, as documentation agent, the
Lenders, Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and UBS Securities LLC,
as joint lead arrangers and joint bookrunners, Credit Suisse
Securities (USA) LLC, as joint bookrunner and co-arranger, and
Banc Of America Securities LLC, as co-arranger.
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-27038
|
|
10.2
|
|
4/11/2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Filing
|
|
Filed
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit Description
|
|
Form
|
|
File No.
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
Date
|
|
Herewith
|
|
|
10
|
.28
|
|
Increase Joinder, dated as of August 24, 2007, by and among
Nuance Communications, Inc. and the other parties identified
therein, to the Amended and Restated Senior Secured Credit
Facility dated as of April 5, 2007.
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-27038
|
|
10.1
|
|
8/30/2007
|
|
|
|
10
|
.29
|
|
Stock Option Agreement, dated as of October 10, 2006, by
and between the Registrant and Don Hunt.*
|
|
10-Q
|
|
0-27038
|
|
10.1
|
|
2/9/2007
|
|
|
|
10
|
.30
|
|
Restricted Stock Purchase Agreement (Performance Based Vesting),
dated as of October 10, 2006, by and between the Registrant
and Don Hunt.*
|
|
10-Q
|
|
0-27038
|
|
10.1
|
|
2/9/2007
|
|
|
|
10
|
.31
|
|
Restricted Stock Purchase Agreement (Time Based Vesting), dated
as of October 10, 2006, by and between the Registrant and
Don Hunt.*
|
|
10-Q
|
|
0-27038
|
|
10.1
|
|
2/9/2007
|
|
|
|
10
|
.32
|
|
Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Plan.
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-27038
|
|
10.1
|
|
3/15/2007
|
|
|
|
10
|
.33
|
|
Letter, dated June 3, 2008, from the Registrant to Thomas
L. Beaudoin regarding certain employment matters.
|
|
10-K
|
|
0-27038
|
|
10.39
|
|
12/1/2008
|
|
|
|
10
|
.34
|
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of
December 29, 2008, by and between Nuance Communications,
Inc. and Paul Ricci.*
|
|
10-Q
|
|
0-27038
|
|
10.1
|
|
2/9/2009
|
|
|
|
10
|
.35
|
|
Amended and Restated Stock Plan.*
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-27038
|
|
99.1
|
|
2/5/2009
|
|
|
|
10
|
.36
|
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of
June 23, 2009, by and between Nuance Communications, Inc.
and Paul Ricci.*
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-27038
|
|
99.1
|
|
6/26/2009
|
|
|
|
10
|
.37
|
|
Letter, dated March 29, 2010, to Janet Dillione regarding
certain employment matters.
|
|
10-Q
|
|
0-27038
|
|
10.1
|
|
8/9/2010
|
|
|
|
14
|
.1
|
|
Registrants Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.
|
|
10-K
|
|
0-27038
|
|
14.1
|
|
3/15/2004
|
|
|
|
21
|
.1
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Registrant.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
23
|
.1
|
|
Consent of BDO USA, LLP.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
24
|
.1
|
|
Power of Attorney. (See Signature Page).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a)
or 15d-14(a).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a)
or 15d-14(a).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Filing
|
|
Filed
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit Description
|
|
Form
|
|
File No.
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
Date
|
|
Herewith
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
The following materials from Nuance Communications, Inc.s
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010, formatted in
XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the
Consolidated Statements of Operations, (ii) the
Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iii) the Consolidated
Statements of Stockholders Equity and Comprehensive Loss,
(iv) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and
(v) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Denotes management compensatory plan or arrangement |