e10vq
Table of Contents

 
 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
     
    Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011
for the quarterly period ended: June, 30 2011
     
    Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
for the transition period from                      to                     .
Commission File Number: 000-10661
TriCo Bancshares
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
     
CALIFORNIA
(State or Other Jurisdiction
of Incorporation or Organization)
  94-2792841
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
63 Constitution Drive
Chico, California 95973
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)(Zip Code)
(530) 898-0300
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “accelerated filer”, “large accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
             
o Large accelerated filer   þ Accelerated filer   o Non-accelerated filer (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)   o Smaller reporting company
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
o Yes þ No
Indicate the number of shares outstanding for each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practical date:
Common stock, no par value: 15,978,958 shares outstanding as of August 5, 2011
 
 

 


 

TriCo Bancshares
FORM 10-Q
TABLE OF CONTENTS
         
    Page  
    1  
    2  
    2  
    36  
    37  
    58  
    58  
    59  
    59  
    59  
    60  
    60  
    61  
 EX-31.1
 EX-31.2
 EX-32.1
 EX-32.2
 EX-101 INSTANCE DOCUMENT
 EX-101 SCHEMA DOCUMENT
 EX-101 CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
 EX-101 LABELS LINKBASE DOCUMENT
 EX-101 PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
 EX-101 DEFINITION LINKBASE DOCUMENT

 


Table of Contents

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements about TriCo Bancshares (the “Company”) that are subject to the protection of the safe harbor provisions contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements are based on the current knowledge and belief of the Company’s management (“Management”) and include information concerning the Company’s possible or assumed future financial condition and results of operations. When you see any of the words “believes”, “expects”, “anticipates”, “estimates”, or similar expressions, it may mean the Company is making forward-looking statements. A number of factors, some of which are beyond the Company’s ability to predict or control, could cause future results to differ materially from those contemplated. The reader is directed to the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, and Part II, Item 1A of this report for further discussion of factors which could affect the Company’s business and cause actual results to differ materially from those suggested by any forward-looking statement made in this report. Such Form 10-K and this report should be read to put any forward-looking statements in context and to gain a more complete understanding of the risks and uncertainties involved in the Company’s business. Any forward-looking statement may turn out to be wrong and cannot be guaranteed. The Company does not intend to update any forward-looking statement after the date of this report.

1


Table of Contents

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
TRICO BANCSHARES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except share data; unaudited)
                 
    At June 30,     At December 31,  
    2011     2010  
     
Assets:
               
Cash and due from banks
  $ 52,874     $ 57,254  
Cash at Federal Reserve and other banks
    338,180       313,812  
     
Cash and cash equivalents
    391,054       371,066  
Securities available-for-sale
    264,992       277,271  
Restricted equity securities
    9,199       9,133  
Loans held for sale
    4,379       4,988  
Loans
    1,396,062       1,419,571  
Allowance for loan losses
    (43,962 )     (42,571 )
     
Total loans, net
    1,352,100       1,377,000  
Foreclosed assets, net
    9,337       9,913  
Premises and equipment, net
    20,142       19,120  
Cash value of life insurance
    51,441       50,541  
Accrued interest receivable
    6,549       7,131  
Goodwill
    15,519       15,519  
Other intangible assets, net
    475       580  
Mortgage servicing rights
    4,818       4,605  
Indemnification asset
    4,545       5,640  
Other assets
    41,634       37,282  
     
Total assets
  $ 2,176,184     $ 2,189,789  
     
 
               
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity:
               
Liabilities:
               
Deposits:
               
Noninterest-bearing demand
  $ 419,391     $ 424,070  
Interest-bearing
    1,417,340       1,428,103  
     
Total deposits
    1,836,731       1,852,173  
Accrued interest payable
    1,865       2,151  
Reserve for unfunded commitments
    2,640       2,640  
Other liabilities
    29,561       29,170  
Other borrowings
    59,234       62,020  
Junior subordinated debt
    41,238       41,238  
     
Total liabilities
    1,971,269       1,989,392  
     
Commitments and contingencies (Note 18)
               
Shareholders’ equity:
               
Common stock, no par value: 50,000,000 shares authorized; issued and outstanding:
               
15,978,958 at June 30, 2011
    83,863          
15,860,138 at December 31, 2010
            81,554  
Retained earnings
    118,408       117,533  
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax
    2,644       1,310  
     
Total shareholders’ equity
    204,915       200,397  
     
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
  $ 2,176,184     $ 2,189,789  
     
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

2


Table of Contents

TRICO BANCSHARES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(in thousands, except per share data; unaudited)
                                 
    Three months ended     Six months ended  
    June 30,     June 30,  
    2011     2010     2011     2010  
     
Interest and dividend income:
                               
Loans, including fees
  $ 21,735     $ 22,701     $ 43,457     $ 45,514  
Debt securities:
                               
Taxable
    2,347       2,727       4,721       5,482  
Tax exempt
    136       188       276       396  
Dividends
    7       6       14       12  
Interest bearing cash at Federal Reserve and other banks
    242       154       433       308  
     
Total interest and dividend income
    24,467       25,776       48,901       51,712  
     
Interest expense:
                               
Deposits
    1,802       2,727       3,629       5,785  
Other borrowings
    600       602       1,193       1,196  
Junior subordinated debt
    312       313       622       619  
     
Total interest expense
    2,714       3,642       5,444       7,600  
     
Net interest income
    21,753       22,134       43,457       44,112  
Provision for loan losses
    5,561       10,000       12,562       18,500  
     
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
    16,192       12,134       30,895       25,612  
     
Noninterest income:
                               
Service charges and fees
    6,121       6,082       11,903       11,817  
Gain on sale of loans
    495       577       1,220       1,162  
Commissions on sale of non-deposit investment products
    648       362       1,008       629  
Increase in cash value of life insurance
    450       426       900       852  
Other
    537       657       2,570       1,191  
     
Total noninterest income
    8,251       8,104       17,601       15,651  
     
Noninterest expense:
                               
Salaries and related benefits
    10,715       9,985       21,508       20,135  
Other
    9,380       8,423       18,258       17,076  
     
Total noninterest expense
    20,095       18,408       39,766       37,211  
     
Income before income taxes
    4,348       1,830       8,730       4,052  
     
Provision for income taxes
    1,577       510       3,159       1,174  
     
Net income
  $ 2,771     $ 1,320       5,571     $ 2,878  
     
Earnings per share:
                               
Basic
  $ 0.17     $ 0.08     $ 0.35     $ 0.18  
Diluted
  $ 0.17     $ 0.08     $ 0.35     $ 0.18  
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

3


Table of Contents

TRICO BANCSHARES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(In thousands, except share data; unaudited)
                                         
                            Accumulated        
    Shares of                     Other        
    Common     Common     Retained     Comprehensive        
    Stock     Stock     Earnings     Income     Total  
     
Balance at December 31, 2009
    15,787,753     $ 79,508     $ 118,863     $ 2,278     $ 200,649  
 
                                     
Comprehensive income:
                                       
Net income
                    2,878               2,878  
Change in net unrealized loss on securities available for sale, net
                            1,854       1,854  
 
                                     
Total comprehensive income
                                    4,732  
Stock option vesting
            275                       275  
Stock options exercised
    146,403       1,229                       1,229  
Tax benefit of stock options exercised
            390                       390  
Repurchase of common stock
    (74,018 )     (373 )     (991 )             (1,364 )
Dividends paid ($0.22 per share)
                    (3,489 )             (3,489 )
     
 
                                       
Balance at June 30, 2010
    15,860,138     $ 81,029     $ 117,261     $ 4,132     $ 202,422  
     
Balance at December 31, 2010
    15,860,138     $ 81,554     $ 117,533     $ 1,310     $ 200,397  
Comprehensive income:
                                       
Net income
                    5,571               5,571  
Change in net unrealized gain on securities available for sale, net
                            1,334       1,334  
 
                                     
Total comprehensive income
                                    6,905  
Stock option vesting
            500                       500  
Stock options exercised
    296,250       2,428                       2,428  
Tax benefit of stock options exercised
            296                       296  
Repurchase of common stock
    (177,430 )     (915 )     (1,830 )             (2,745 )
Dividends paid ($0.18 per share)
                    (2,866 )             (2,866 )
     
Balance at June 30, 2011
    15,978,958     $ 83,863     $ 118,408     $ 2,644     $ 204,915  
     
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

4


Table of Contents

TRICO BANCSHARES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands; unaudited)
                 
    For the six months ended June 30,  
    2011     2010  
     
Operating activities:
               
Net income
  $ 5,571     $ 2,878  
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
               
Depreciation of premises and equipment, and amortization
    1,612       1,810  
Amortization of intangible assets
    105       137  
Provision for loan losses
    12,562       18,500  
Amortization of investment securities premium, net
    685       432  
Originations of loans for resale
    (55,579 )     (36,420 )
Proceeds from sale of loans originated for resale
    56,973       37,508  
Gain on sale of loans
    (1,220 )     (1,162 )
Change in market value of mortgage servicing rights
    222       618  
Provision for losses on foreclosed assets
    1,087       55  
Gain on sale of foreclosed assets
    (385 )     (350 )
Loss on disposal of fixed assets
    15       40  
Increase in cash value of life insurance
    (900 )     (852 )
Stock option vesting expense
    500       275  
Stock option excess tax benefits
    (296 )     (390 )
Bargain purchase gain
          (232 )
Change in reserve for unfunded commitments
          (800 )
Change in:
               
Interest receivable
    582       291  
Interest payable
    (286 )     (1,127 )
Other assets and liabilities, net
    (3,900 )     1,266  
     
Net cash from operating activities
    17,348       22,477  
     
Investing activities:
               
Proceeds from maturities of securities available-for-sale
    39,352       42,816  
Purchases of securities available-for-sale
    (25,456 )     (101,255 )
Redemption (purchase) of restricted equity securities, net
    (66 )     447  
Loan principal (increases) decreases, net
    8,084       40,097  
Proceeds from sale of foreclosed assets
    4,145       2,497  
Improvements of foreclosed assets
    (17 )      
Proceeds from sale of premises and equipment
    1       2  
Purchases of premises and equipment
    (2,288 )     (1,691 )
Cash received from acquisitions
          18,764  
     
Net cash from investing activities
    23,755       1,677  
     
Financing activities:
               
Net decrease in deposits
    (15,442 )     (33,564 )
Net change in short-term other borrowings
    (2,786 )     (11,301 )
Stock option excess tax benefits
    296       390  
Repurchase of common stock
    (753 )     (338 )
Dividends paid
    (2,866 )     (3,489 )
Exercise of stock options
    436       203  
     
Net cash from financing activities
    (21,115 )     (48,099 )
     
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
    19,988       (23,945 )
     
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
    371,066       346,589  
     
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
  $ 391,054     $ 322,644  
     
Supplemental disclosure of noncash activities:
               
Loans transferred to other real estate owned
  $ 4,254     $ 3,788  
Unrealized net gain on securities available for sale
  $ 2,302     $ 3,200  
Market value of shares tendered by employees in-lieu of cash to pay for exercise options and/or related taxes
  $ 1,992     $ 1,026  
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow activity:
               
Cash paid for interest expense
  $ 5,730     $ 8,727  
Cash paid for income taxes
  $ 2,620     $ 2,625  
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

5


Table of Contents

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1 — General Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The results of operations reflect interim adjustments, all of which are of a normal recurring nature and which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim periods presented. The interim results are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for the full year. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes as well as other information included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Tri Counties Bank (the “Bank”). All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires Management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. On an on-going basis, the Company evaluates its estimates, including those related to the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, investments, intangible assets, income taxes and contingencies. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. The allowance for loan losses, goodwill and other intangible assets, income taxes, and the valuation of mortgage servicing rights are the only accounting estimates that materially affect the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Significant Group Concentration of Credit Risk
The Company grants agribusiness, commercial, consumer, and residential loans to customers located throughout the northern San Joaquin Valley, the Sacramento Valley and northern mountain regions of California. The Company has a diversified loan portfolio within the business segments located in this geographical area. The Company currently classifies all its operation into one business segment that it denotes as community banking.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
For purposes of the consolidated statements of cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, amounts due from banks and federal funds sold.
Investment Securities
The Company classifies its debt and marketable equity securities into one of three categories: trading, available-for-sale or held-to-maturity. Trading securities are bought and held principally for the purpose of selling in the near term. Held-to-maturity securities are those securities which the Company has the ability and intent to hold until maturity. All other securities not included in trading or held-to-maturity are classified as available-for-sale. During the six months ended June 30, 2011 and the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company did not have any securities classified as either held-to-maturity or trading.
Available-for-sale securities are recorded at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses, net of the related tax effect, on available-for-sale securities are reported as a separate component of other accumulated comprehensive income (loss) in shareholders’ equity until realized.
Premiums and discounts are amortized or accreted over the life of the related investment security as an adjustment to yield using the effective interest method. Dividend and interest income are recognized when earned. Realized gains and losses are derived from the amortized cost of the security sold.
The Company assesses an other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) based on whether it intends to sell a security or if it is likely that the Company would be required to sell the security before recovery of the amortized cost basis of the investment, which may be maturity. For debt securities, if we intend to sell the security or it is likely that we will be required to sell the security before recovering its cost basis, the entire impairment loss would be recognized in earnings as an OTTI. If we do not intend to sell the security and it is not likely that we will be required to sell the security but we do not expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the security, only the portion of the impairment loss representing credit losses would be recognized in earnings. The credit loss on a security is measured as the difference between the amortized cost basis and the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected. Projected cash flows are discounted by the original or current effective interest rate depending on the nature of the security being measured for potential OTTI. The remaining impairment related to all other factors, the difference between the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected and fair value, is recognized as a charge to other comprehensive income (“OCI”). Impairment losses related to all other factors are presented as separate categories within OCI. For investment securities held to maturity, this amount is accreted over the remaining life of the debt security prospectively based on the amount and timing of future estimated cash flows. The accretion of the amount recorded in OCI increases the

6


Table of Contents

carrying value of the investment and does not affect earnings. If there is an indication of additional credit losses the security is re-evaluated according to the procedures described above. No OTTI losses were recognized in the six months ended June 30, 2011 or the year ended December 31, 2010.
Restricted Equity Securities
Restricted equity securities represent the Company’s investment in the stock of the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco (“FHLB”) and are carried at par value, which reasonably approximates its fair value. While technically these are considered equity securities, there is no market for the FHLB stock. Therefore, the shares are considered as restricted investment securities. Management periodically evaluates FHLB stock for other-than-temporary impairment. Management’s determination of whether these investments are impaired is based on its assessment of the ultimate recoverability of cost rather than by recognizing temporary declines in value. The determination of whether a decline affects the ultimate recoverability of cost is influenced by criteria such as (1) the significance of any decline in net assets of the FHLB as compared to the capital stock amount for the FHLB and the length of time this situation has persisted, (2) commitments by the FHLB to make payments required by law or regulation and the level of such payments in relation to the operating performance of the FHLB, (3) the impact of legislative and regulatory changes on institutions and, accordingly, the customer base of the FHLB, and (4) the liquidity position of the FHLB.
As a member of the FHLB system, the Company is required to maintain a minimum level of investment in FHLB stock based on specific percentages of its outstanding mortgages, total assets, or FHLB advances. The Company may request redemption at par value of any stock in excess of the minimum required investment. Stock redemptions are at the discretion of the FHLB.
Loans Held for Sale
Loans originated and intended for sale in the secondary market are carried at the lower of aggregate cost or fair value, as determined by aggregate outstanding commitments from investors of current investor yield requirements. Net unrealized losses are recognized through a valuation allowance by charges to noninterest income.
Mortgage loans held for sale are generally sold with the mortgage servicing rights retained by the Company. The carrying value of mortgage loans sold is reduced by the cost allocated to the associated mortgage servicing rights. Gains or losses on the sale of loans that are held for sale are recognized at the time of the sale and determined by the difference between net sale proceeds and the net book value of the loans less the estimated fair value of any retained mortgage servicing rights.
Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses
Loans originated by the Company, i.e., not purchased or acquired in a business combination, are reported at the principal amount outstanding, net of deferred loan fees and costs. Loan origination and commitment fees and certain direct loan origination costs are deferred, and the net amount is amortized as an adjustment of the related loan’s yield over the actual life of the loan. Originated loans on which the accrual of interest has been discontinued are designated as nonaccrual loans.
Originated loans are placed in nonaccrual status when reasonable doubt exists as to the full, timely collection of interest or principal, or a loan becomes contractually past due by 90 days or more with respect to interest or principal and is not well secured and in the process of collection. When an originated loan is placed on nonaccrual status, all interest previously accrued but not collected is reversed. Income on such loans is then recognized only to the extent that cash is received and where the future collection of principal is probable. Interest accruals are resumed on such loans only when they are brought fully current with respect to interest and principal and when, in the judgment of Management, the loan is estimated to be fully collectible as to both principal and interest.
An allowance for loan losses for originated loans is established through a provision for loan losses charged to expense. Originated loans and deposit related overdrafts are charged against the allowance for loan losses when Management believes that the collectability of the principal is unlikely or, with respect to consumer installment loans, according to an established delinquency schedule. The allowance is an amount that Management believes will be adequate to absorb probable losses inherent in existing loans and leases, based on evaluations of the collectability, impairment and prior loss experience of loans and leases. The evaluations take into consideration such factors as changes in the nature and size of the portfolio, overall portfolio quality, loan concentrations, specific problem loans, and current economic conditions that may affect the borrower’s ability to pay. The Company defines an originated loan as impaired when it is probable the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Impaired originated loans are measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s original effective interest rate. As a practical expedient, impairment may be measured based on the loan’s observable market price or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. When the measure of the impaired loan is less than the recorded investment in the loan, the impairment is recorded through a valuation allowance.
In situations related to originated loans where, for economic or legal reasons related to a borrower’s financial difficulties, the Company grants a concession for other than an insignificant period of time to the borrower that the Company would not otherwise consider, the related loan is classified as a troubled debt restructuring (TDR). The Company strives to identify borrowers in financial difficulty early and work with them to modify to more affordable terms before their loan reaches nonaccrual status. These modified terms may include rate reductions, principal forgiveness, payment forbearance and other actions intended to minimize the economic loss and to avoid foreclosure or repossession of the collateral. In cases where the Company grants the borrower new terms that provide for a reduction of either interest or principal, the Company measures any impairment on the restructuring as noted above for impaired loans. TDR loans are classified as impaired until they are fully paid off or charged off. Loans that are in nonaccrual status at the time they become TDR loans, remain in

7


Table of Contents

nonaccrual status until the borrower demonstrates a sustained period of performance which the Company generally believes to be six consecutive months of payments, or equivalent. Otherwise, TDR loans are subject to the same nonaccrual and charge-off policies as noted above with respect to their restructured principal balance.
Credit risk is inherent in the business of lending. As a result, the Company maintains an allowance for loan losses to absorb losses inherent in the Company’s originated loan portfolio. This is maintained through periodic charges to earnings. These charges are included in the Consolidated Income Statements as provision for loan losses. All specifically identifiable and quantifiable losses are immediately charged off against the allowance. However, for a variety of reasons, not all losses are immediately known to the Company and, of those that are known, the full extent of the loss may not be quantifiable at that point in time. The balance of the Company’s allowance for originated loan losses is meant to be an estimate of these unknown but probable losses inherent in the portfolio.
The Company formally assesses the adequacy of the allowance for originated loan losses on a quarterly basis. Determination of the adequacy is based on ongoing assessments of the probable risk in the outstanding originated loan portfolio, and to a lesser extent the Company’s originated loan commitments. These assessments include the periodic re-grading of credits based on changes in their individual credit characteristics including delinquency, seasoning, recent financial performance of the borrower, economic factors, changes in the interest rate environment, growth of the portfolio as a whole or by segment, and other factors as warranted. Loans are initially graded when originated. They are re-graded as they are renewed, when there is a new loan to the same borrower, when identified facts demonstrate heightened risk of nonpayment, or if they become delinquent. Re-grading of larger problem loans occurs at least quarterly. Confirmation of the quality of the grading process is obtained by independent credit reviews conducted by consultants specifically hired for this purpose and by various bank regulatory agencies.
The Company’s method for assessing the appropriateness of the allowance for originated loan losses includes specific allowances for impaired originated loans and leases, formula allowance factors for pools of credits, and allowances for changing environmental factors (e.g., interest rates, growth, economic conditions, etc.). Allowance factors for loan pools are based on historical loss experience by product type. Allowances for impaired loans are based on analysis of individual credits. Allowances for changing environmental factors are Management’s best estimate of the probable impact these changes have had on the originated loan portfolio as a whole. The allowance for originated loans is included in the allowance for loan losses.
Acquired loans are valued as of acquisition date in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification (“FASB ASC”) Topic 805, Business Combinations. Loans purchased with evidence of credit deterioration since origination for which it is probable that all contractually required payments will not be collected are referred to as purchased credit impaired (PCI) loans. PCI loans are accounted for under FASB ASC Topic 310-30, Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality. In addition, because of the significant credit discounts associated with the loans acquired in the Granite acquisition, the Company elected to account for all loans acquired in the Granite acquisition under FASB ASC Topic 310-30, and classify them all as PCI loans. Under FASB ASC Topic 805 and FASB ASC Topic 310-30, PCI loans are recorded at fair value at acquisition date, factoring in credit losses expected to be incurred over the life of the loan. Accordingly, an allowance for loan losses is not carried over or recorded as of the acquisition date. Fair value is defined as the present value of the future estimated principal and interest payments of the loan, with the discount rate used in the present value calculation representing the estimated effective yield of the loan. Default rates, loss severity, and prepayment speed assumptions are periodically reassessed and our estimate of future payments is adjusted accordingly. The difference between contractual future payments and estimated future payments is referred to as the nonaccretable difference. The difference between estimated future payments and the present value of the estimated future payments is referred to as the accretable yield. The accretable yield represents the amount that is expected to be recorded as interest income over the remaining life of the loan. If after acquisition, the Company determines that the estimated future cash flows of a PCI loan are expected to be more than the originally estimated, an increase in the discount rate (effective yield) would be made such that the newly increased accretable yield would be recognized, on a level yield basis, over the remaining estimated life of the loan. If after acquisition, the Company determines that the estimated future cash flows of a PCI loan are expected to be less than the previously estimated, the discount rate would first be reduced until the present value of the reduced cash flow estimate equals the previous present value however, the discount rate may not be lowered below its original level at acquisition. If the discount rate has been lowered to its original level and the present value has not been sufficiently lowered, an allowance for loan loss would be established through a provision for loan losses charged to expense to decrease the present value to the required level. If the estimated cash flows improve after an allowance has been established for a loan, the allowance may be partially or fully reversed depending on the improvement in the estimated cash flows. Only after the allowance has been fully reversed may the discount rate be increased. PCI loans are put on nonaccrual status when cash flows cannot be reasonably estimated. PCI loans are charged off when evidence suggests cash flows are not recoverable. Foreclosed assets from PCI loans are recorded in foreclosed assets at fair value with the fair value at time of foreclosure representing cash flow from the loan. ASC 310-30 allows PCI loans with similar risk characteristics and acquisition time frame to be “pooled” and have their cash flows aggregated as if they were one loan.
Loans are also categorized as “covered” or “noncovered”. Covered loans refer to loans covered by a Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) loss sharing agreement. Noncovered loans refer to loans not covered by a FDIC loss sharing agreement.

8


Table of Contents

Foreclosed Assets
Foreclosed assets include assets acquired through, or in lieu of, loan foreclosure. Foreclosed assets are held for sale and are initially recorded at fair value at the date of foreclosure, establishing a new cost basis. Subsequent to foreclosure, management periodically performs valuations and the assets are carried at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell. Revenue and expenses from operations and changes in the valuation allowance are included in other noninterest expense. Foreclosed assets that are not subject to a FDIC loss-share agreement are referred to as noncovered foreclosed assets.
Foreclosed assets acquired through FDIC-assisted acquisitions that are subject to a FDIC loss-share agreement, and all assets acquired via foreclosure of covered loans are referred to as covered foreclosed assets. Covered foreclosed assets are reported exclusive of expected reimbursement cash flows from the FDIC. Foreclosed covered loan collateral is transferred into covered foreclosed assets at the loan’s carrying value, inclusive of the acquisition date fair value discount.
Covered foreclosed assets are initially recorded at estimated fair value on the acquisition date based on similar market comparable valuations less estimated selling costs. Any subsequent valuation adjustments due to declines in fair value will be charged to noninterest expense, and will be mostly offset by noninterest income representing the corresponding increase to the FDIC indemnification asset for the offsetting loss reimbursement amount. Any recoveries of previous valuation adjustments will be credited to noninterest expense with a corresponding charge to noninterest income for the portion of the recovery that is due to the FDIC.
Premises and Equipment
Land is carried at cost. Buildings and equipment, including those acquired under capital lease, are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization expenses are computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets or lease terms. Asset lives range from 3-10 years for furniture and equipment and 15-40 years for land improvements and buildings.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill represents the excess of costs over fair value of net assets of businesses acquired. Goodwill and other intangible assets acquired in a purchase business combination and determined to have an indefinite useful life are not amortized, but instead tested for impairment at least annually. Intangible assets with estimable useful lives are amortized over their respective estimated useful lives to their estimated residual values, and reviewed for impairment.
The Company has identifiable intangible assets consisting of core deposit intangibles (CDI) and minimum pension liability. CDI are amortized using an accelerated method over a period of ten years. Intangible assets related to minimum pension liability are adjusted annually based upon actuarial estimates.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Goodwill
Long-lived assets, such as premises and equipment, and purchased intangibles subject to amortization, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. Assets to be disposed of would be separately presented in the balance sheet and reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell, and are no longer depreciated. The assets and liabilities of a disposed group classified as held for sale would be presented separately in the appropriate asset and liability sections of the balance sheet.
As of December 31 of each year, goodwill is tested for impairment, and is tested for impairment more frequently if events and circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. An impairment loss is recognized to the extent that the carrying amount exceeds the asset’s fair value. This determination is made at the reporting unit level and consists of two steps. First, the Company determines the fair value of a reporting unit and compares it to its carrying amount. Second, if the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss is recognized for any excess of the carrying amount of the reporting unit’s goodwill over the implied fair value of that goodwill. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined by allocating the fair value of the reporting unit in a manner similar to a purchase price allocation. The residual fair value after this allocation is the implied fair value of the reporting unit goodwill. Currently, and historically, the Company is comprised of only one reporting unit that operates within the business segment it has identified as “community banking”.
Mortgage Servicing Rights
Mortgage servicing rights (MSR) represent the Company’s right to a future stream of cash flows based upon the contractual servicing fee associated with servicing mortgage loans. Our MSR arise from residential mortgage loans that we originate and sell, but retain the right to service the loans. For sales of residential mortgage loans, a portion of the cost of originating the loan is allocated to the servicing right based on the fair values of the loan and the servicing right. The net gain from the retention of the servicing right is included in gain on sale of loans in noninterest income when the loan is sold. Fair value is based on market prices for comparable mortgage servicing contracts, when available, or alternatively, is based on a valuation model that calculates the present value of estimated future net servicing income. The valuation model incorporates assumptions that market participants would use in estimating future net servicing income, such as the cost to service, the discount rate, the custodial earnings rate, an inflation rate, ancillary income, prepayment speeds and default rates and losses. MSR are included in other assets. Servicing fees are recorded in noninterest income when earned.

9


Table of Contents

The determination of fair value of our MSR requires management judgment because they are not actively traded. The determination of fair value for MSR requires valuation processes which combine the use of discounted cash flow models and extensive analysis of current market data to arrive at an estimate of fair value. The cash flow and prepayment assumptions used in our discounted cash flow model are based on empirical data drawn from the historical performance of our MSR, which we believe are consistent with assumptions used by market participants valuing similar MSR, and from data obtained on the performance of similar MSR. The key assumptions used in the valuation of MSR include mortgage prepayment speeds and the discount rate. These variables can, and generally will, change from quarter to quarter as market conditions and projected interest rates change. The key risks inherent with MSR are prepayment speed and changes in interest rates. The Company uses an independent third party to determine fair value of MSR.
Indemnification Asset
The Company has elected to account for amounts receivable under loss-share agreements with the FDIC as indemnification assets in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations. FDIC indemnification assets are initially recorded at fair value, based on the discounted value of expected future cash flows under the loss-share agreements. The difference between the fair value and the undiscounted cash flows the Company expects to collect from the FDIC will be accreted into noninterest income over the life of the FDIC indemnification asset.
FDIC indemnification assets are reviewed quarterly and adjusted for any changes in expected cash flows based on recent performance and expectations for future performance of the covered portfolios. These adjustments are measured on the same basis as the related covered loans and covered other real estate owned. Any increases in cash flow of the covered assets over those expected will reduce the FDIC indemnification asset and any decreases in cash flow of the covered assets under those expected will increase the FDIC indemnification asset. Increases and decreases to the FDIC indemnification asset are recorded as adjustments to noninterest income.
Reserve for Unfunded Commitments
The reserve for unfunded commitments is established through a provision for losses — unfunded commitments charged to noninterest expense. The reserve for unfunded commitments is an amount that Management believes will be adequate to absorb probable losses inherent in existing commitments, including unused portions of revolving lines of credits and other loans, standby letters of credits, and unused deposit account overdraft privilege. The reserve for unfunded commitments is based on evaluations of the collectability, and prior loss experience of unfunded commitments. The evaluations take into consideration such factors as changes in the nature and size of the loan portfolio, overall loan portfolio quality, loan concentrations, specific problem loans and related unfunded commitments, and current economic conditions that may affect the borrower’s or depositor’s ability to pay.
Income Taxes
The Company’s accounting for income taxes is based on an asset and liability approach. The Company recognizes the amount of taxes payable or refundable for the current year, and deferred tax assets and liabilities for the future tax consequences that have been recognized in its financial statements or tax returns. The measurement of tax assets and liabilities is based on the provisions of enacted tax laws.
Off-Balance Sheet Credit Related Financial Instruments
In the ordinary course of business, the Company has entered into commitments to extend credit, including commitments under credit card arrangements, commercial letters of credit, and standby letters of credit. Such financial instruments are recorded when they are funded.
Geographical Descriptions
For the purpose of describing the geographical location of the Company’s loans, the Company has defined northern California as that area of California north of, and including, Stockton; central California as that area of the state south of Stockton, to and including, Bakersfield; and southern California as that area of the state south of Bakersfield.
Reclassifications
Certain amounts reported in previous financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the presentation in this report. These reclassifications did not affect previously reported net income or total shareholders’ equity.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2010-20, Receivables (Topic 310): Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses. This Update amends Topic 310 to improve the disclosures that an entity provides about the credit quality of its financing receivables and the related allowance for credit losses. As a result of these amendments, an entity is required to disaggregate by portfolio segment or class certain existing disclosures and provide certain new disclosures about its financing receivables and related allowance for credit losses. The amendments in this Update apply to all entities, both public and nonpublic. The amendments in this Update affect all entities with financing receivables, excluding short-term trade accounts receivable or receivables measured at fair value or lower of cost or fair value. For public entities, the disclosures required by this Update as of the end of a reporting period are effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending on or after December 15, 2010. The disclosures about activity that occurs during a reporting period are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2010. For nonpublic entities, the disclosures are effective for annual reporting periods ending on or after December 15, 2011. The amendments in this Update encourage, but do not require, comparative disclosures for earlier reporting periods that ended before initial adoption. However, an entity should provide comparative disclosures for those reporting periods ending after initial adoption. As this ASU is disclosure-related only, the adoption of this ASU did not impact the Bank’s financial condition or results of operations.

10


Table of Contents

FASB issued ASU No. 2010-28, Intangibles — Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): When to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for Reporting Units with Zero or Negative Carrying Amounts. This update modifies Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. For those reporting units, an entity is required to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists. In determining whether it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists, an entity should consider whether there are any adverse qualitative factors indicating that an impairment may exist such as if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. This update was effective for the Company on January 1, 2011 and is not expected have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.
FASB issued ASU No. 2011-02, Receivables (Topic 310): A Creditor’s Determination of Whether a Restructuring Is a Troubled Debt Restructuring. This Update provides additional guidance relating to when creditors should classify loan modifications as troubled debt restructurings. This Update also ends the deferral issued in January 2010 of the disclosures about troubled debt restructurings required by ASU No. 2010-20. The provisions of ASU No. 2011-02 and the disclosure requirements of ASU No. 2010-20 are effective for the Company’s interim reporting period ending September 30, 2011. The guidance applies retrospectively to restructurings occurring on or after January 1, 2011. The adoption of this Update is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
FASB issued ASU No. 2011-03, Transfers and Servicing (Topic 860): Reconsideration of Effective Control for Repurchase Agreements. This Update is intended to improve financial reporting of repurchase agreements and other agreements that both entitle and obligate a transferor to repurchase or redeem financial assets before their maturity. ASU 2011-03 removes from the assessment of effective control (i) the criterion requiring the transferor to have the ability to repurchase or redeem the financial assets on substantially the agreed terms, even in the event of default by the transferee, and (ii) the collateral maintenance guidance related to that criterion. ASU 2011-03 will be effective for the Company on January 1, 2012 and is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.
FASB issued ASU No. 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclousre Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs. ASU 2011-04 amends Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, to converge the fair value measurement guidance in U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and International Financial Reporting Standards. ASU 2011-04 clarifies the application of existing fair value measurement requirements, changes certain principles in Topic 820 and requires additional fair value disclosures. ASU 2011-04 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011, and is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.
FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220) — Presentation of Comprehensive Income. ASU 2011-05 amends Topic 220, Comprehensive Income, to require that all nonowner changes in stockholders’ equity be presented in either a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. Additionally, ASU 2011-05 requires entities to present, on the face of the financial statements, reclassification adjustments for items that are reclassified from other comprehensive income to net income in the statement or statements where the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income are presented. The option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity was eliminated. ASU 2011-05 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011, and is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

11


Table of Contents

Note 2 — Business Combinations
On May 28, 2010, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency closed Granite Community Bank (“Granite”), Granite Bay, California and appointed the FDIC as receiver. That same date, the Bank assumed the banking operations of Granite from the FDIC under a whole bank purchase and assumption agreement with loss sharing. Under the terms of the loss sharing agreement, the FDIC will cover a substantial portion of any future losses on loans, related unfunded loan commitments, other real estate owned (OREO)/foreclosed assets and accrued interest on loans for up to 90 days. The FDIC will absorb 80% of losses and share in 80% of loss recoveries on the covered assets acquired from Granite. The loss sharing arrangements for non-single family residential and single family residential loans are in effect for 5 years and 10 years, respectively, and the loss recovery provisions are in effect for 8 years and 10 years, respectively, from the acquisition date. With this agreement, the Bank added one traditional bank branch in each of Granite Bay, Roseville and Auburn, California. This acquisition is consistent with the Bank’s community banking expansion strategy and provides further opportunity to fill in the Bank’s market presence in the greater Sacramento, California market.
The operations of Granite are included in the Company’s operating results from May 28, 2010, and through December 31, 2010 added revenue of $4,967,000, including a bargain purchase gain of $232,000, noninterest expense of $2,078,000 and a provision for loan losses of $1,608,000, that resulted in a contribution to net income after-tax of approximately $743,000. Such operating results are not necessarily indicative of future operating results. Granite’s results of operations prior to the acquisition are not included in the Company’s operating results. During the quarter ended September 30, 2010, the Company completed the conversion of Granite’s information and product delivery systems. As of December 31, 2010, nonrecurring expenses related to the Granite acquisition and systems conversion were approximately $250,000.
The assets acquired and liabilities assumed for the Granite acquisition have been accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting (formerly the purchase method). The assets and liabilities, both tangible and intangible, were recorded at their estimated fair values as of the acquisition dates. The fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed were determined based on the requirements of the Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures topic of the FASB ASC. The tax treatment of FDIC assisted acquisitions is complex and subject to interpretations that may result in future adjustments of deferred taxes as of the acquisition date. The terms of the agreements provide for the FDIC to indemnify the Bank against claims with respect to liabilities of Granite not assumed by the Bank and certain other types of claims identified in the agreement. The application of the acquisition method of accounting resulted in the recognition of a bargain purchase gain of $232,000 in the Granite acquisition. A summary of the net assets received in the Granite acquisition, at their estimated fair values, is presented below:
         
    Granite  
(in thousands)   May 28, 2010  
Asset acquired:
       
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 18,764  
Securities available-for-sale
    2,954  
Restricted equity securities
    696  
Covered loans
    64,802  
Premises and equipment
    17  
Core deposit intangible
    562  
Covered foreclosed assets
    4,629  
FDIC indemnification asset
    7,466  
Other assets
    392  
 
     
Total assets acquired
  $ 100,282  
 
     
Liabilities assumed:
       
Deposits
  $ 95,001  
Other borrowings
    5,000  
Other liabilities
    49  
 
     
Total liabilities assumed
    100,050  
 
     
Net assets acquired/bargain purchase gain
  $ 232  
 
     
The acquired loan portfolio and foreclosed assets are referred to as “covered loans” and “covered foreclosed assets”, respectively, and these are recorded in Loans and Foreclosed assets, respectively, in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet. Collectively these balances are referred to as “covered assets”.
In FDIC-assisted transactions, only certain assets and liabilities are transferred to the acquirer and, depending on the nature and amount of the acquirer’s bid, the FDIC may be required to make a cash payment to the acquirer. In the Granite acquisition, net assets with a cost basis of $4,345,000 were transferred to the Bank. In the Granite acquisition, the Company recorded a bargain purchase gain of $232,000 representing the excess of the estimated fair value of the assets acquired over the estimated fair value of the liabilities assumed.
The Bank did not immediately acquire all the real estate, banking facilities, furniture or equipment of Granite as part of the purchase and assumption agreement. However, the Bank had the option to purchase or lease the real estate and furniture and equipment from the FDIC. During the quarter ended September 30, 2010, the Bank elected to close the Roseville branch and assume the leases for the Granite Bay and Auburn branches. The Bank purchased the existing furniture and equipment in the Granite Bay and Auburn branches from the FDIC for approximately $100,000.

12


Table of Contents

A summary of the estimated fair value adjustments resulting in the bargain purchase gain in the Granite acquisition are presented below:
         
    Granite  
(in thousands)   May 28, 2010  
Cost basis net assets acquired
  $ 4,345  
Cash payment received from FDIC
    3,940  
Fair value adjustments:
       
Securities available-for-sale
    (118 )
Loans
    (13,189 )
Foreclosed assets
    (2,616 )
Core deposit intangible
    562  
FDIC indemnification asset
    7,466  
Deposits
    (209 )
Other
    51  
 
     
Bargain purchase gain
  $ 232  
 
     
The following table reflects the estimated fair value of the acquired loans at the acquisition date:
         
    Granite  
(in thousands)   May 28, 2010  
Principal balance loans acquired
  $ 77,991  
Discount
    (13,189 )
 
     
Covered loans, net
  $ 64,802  
 
     
In estimating the fair value of the covered loans at the acquisition date, we (a) calculated the contractual amount and timing of undiscounted principal and interest payments and (b) estimated the amount and timing of undiscounted expected principal and interest payments. The difference between these two amounts represents the nonaccretable difference.
On the acquisition date, the amount by which the undiscounted expected cash flows exceed the estimated fair value of the acquired loans is the “accretable yield”. The accretable yield is then measured at each financial reporting date and represents the difference between the remaining undiscounted expected cash flows and the current carrying value of the loans.
The following table presents a reconciliation of the undiscounted contractual cash flows, nonaccretable difference, accretable yield, and fair value of covered loans for each respective acquired loan portfolio at the acquisition dates:
         
    Granite  
(in thousands)   May 28, 2010  
Undiscounted contractual cash flows
  $ 99,179  
Undiscounted cash flows not expected to be collected (nonaccretable difference)
    (11,226 )
 
     
Undiscounted cash flows expected to be collected
    87,953  
Accretable yield at acquisition
    (23,151 )
 
     
Estimated fair value of Loans acquired at acquisition
  $ 64,802  
 
     

13


Table of Contents

Note 3 — Investment Securities
The amortized cost and estimated fair values of investments in debt and equity securities are summarized in the following tables:
                                 
    June 30, 2011  
            Gross     Gross     Estimated  
    Amortized     Unrealized     Unrealized     Fair  
    Cost     Gains     Losses     Value  
            (in thousands)          
Securities Available-for-Sale
                               
Obligations of U.S. government corporations and agencies
  $ 242,914     $ 9,918           $ 252,832  
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
    11,840       395       (75 )     12,160  
     
 
                               
Total securities available-for-sale
  $ 254,754     $ 10,313     (75 )   $ 264,992  
     
                                 
    December 31, 2010  
            Gross     Gross     Estimated  
    Amortized     Unrealized     Unrealized     Fair  
    Cost     Gains     Losses     Value  
            (in thousands)          
Securities Available-for-Sale
                               
Obligations of U.S. government corporations and agencies
  $ 255,884     $ 8,623     (326 )   $ 264,181  
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
    12,452       141       (52 )     12,541  
Corporate debt securities
    1,000             (451 )     549  
     
 
                               
Total securities available-for-sale
  $ 269,336     $ 8,764     (829 )   $ 277,271  
     
No investment securities were sold during the six months ended June 30, 2011 or the year ended December 31, 2010. Investment securities with an aggregate carrying value of $121,308,000 and $140,100,000 at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, were pledged as collateral for specific borrowings, lines of credit and local agency deposits.
The amortized cost and estimated fair value of debt securities at June 30, 2011 by contractual maturity are shown below. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties. At June 30, 2011, obligations of U.S. government corporations and agencies with a cost basis totaling $242,914,000 consist almost entirely of mortgage-backed securities whose contractual maturity, or principal repayment, will follow the repayment of the underlying mortgages. For purposes of the following table, the entire outstanding balance of these mortgage-backed securities issued by U.S. government corporations and agencies is categorized based on final maturity date. At June 30, 2011, the Company estimates the average remaining life of these mortgage-backed securities issued by U.S. government corporations and agencies to be approximately 3.3 years. Average remaining life is defined as the time span after which the principal balance has been reduced by half.
                 
    Amortized     Estimated  
    Cost     Fair Value  
    (in thousands)  
Investment Securities
               
Due in one year
  $ 22     $ 22  
Due after one year through five years
    25,176       26,336  
Due after five years through ten years
    75,073       76,535  
Due after ten years
    154,483       162,099  
     
Totals
  $ 254,754     $ 264,992  
     

14


Table of Contents

Gross unrealized losses on investment securities and the fair value of the related securities, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, were as follows:
                                                 
    Less than 12 months     12 months or more     Total  
    Fair     Unrealized     Fair     Unrealized     Fair     Unrealized  
    Value     Loss     Value     Loss     Value     Loss  
     
June 30, 2011                   (in thousands)                  
Securities Available-for-Sale:
                                               
Obligations of U.S. government corporations and agencies
  $ 11                       $ 11        
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
    1,649       (75 )                 1,649       (75 )
     
 
                                               
Total securities available-for-sale
  $ 1,660     (75 )               $ 1,660     (75 )
     
                                                 
    Less than 12 months     12 months or more     Total  
    Fair     Unrealized     Fair     Unrealized     Fair     Unrealized  
    Value     Loss     Value     Loss     Value     Loss  
     
December 31, 2010                   (in thousands)                  
Securities Available-for-Sale:
                                               
Obligations of U.S. government corporations and agencies
  $ 54,760     (326 )               $ 54,760     (326 )
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
    1,345       (22 )     513       (30 )     1,858       (52 )
Corporate debt securities
                549       (451 )     549       (451 )
     
 
                                               
Total securities available-for-sale
  $ 56,105     (348 )   $ 1,062     (481 )   $ 57,167     (829 )
     
Obligations of U.S. government corporations and agencies: Unrealized losses on investments in obligations of U.S. government corporations and agencies are caused by interest rate increases. The contractual cash flows of these securities are guaranteed by U.S. Government Sponsored Entities (principally Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac). It is expected that the securities would not be settled at a price less than the amortized cost of the investment. Because the decline in fair value is attributable to changes in interest rates and not credit quality, and because the Company does not intend to sell and more likely than not will not be required to sell, these investments are not considered other-than-temporarily impaired. At June 30, 2011, one debt securities representing obligations of U.S. government corporations and agencies had an unrealized loss with aggregate depreciation of 0.03% from the Company’s amortized cost basis.
Obligations of states and political subdivisions: The unrealized losses on investments in obligations of states and political subdivisions are caused by increases in required yields by investors in these types of securities. It is expected that the securities would not be settled at a price less than the amortized cost of the investment. Because the decline in fair value is attributable to changes in interest rates and not credit quality, and because the Company does not intend to sell and more likely than not will not be required to sell, these investments are not considered other-than-temporarily impaired. At June 30, 2011, three debt securities representing obligations of states and political subdivisions had unrealized losses with aggregate depreciation of 4.35% from the Company’s amortized cost basis.
Corporate debt securities: The unrealized losses on investments in corporate debt securities were caused by increases in required yields by investors in similar types of securities. It is expected that the securities would not be settled at a price less than the amortized cost of the investment. Because the decline in fair value is attributable to changes in interest rates and not credit quality, and because the Company does not intend to sell and more likely than not will not be required to sell, these investments are not considered other-than-temporarily impaired. At June 30, 2011, the Company had no corporate debt securities.

15


Table of Contents

Note 4 — Loans
A summary of the balances of loans follows (in thousands):
                                                 
    June 30, 2011     December 31, 2010  
    Originated     PCI     Total     Originated     PCI     Total  
         
Mortgage loans on real estate:
                                               
Residential 1-4 family
  $ 121,474     $ 6,398     $ 127,872     $ 123,623     $ 7,597     $ 131,220  
Commercial
    679,922       24,661       704,583       682,103       25,739       707,842  
         
Total mortgage loan on real estate
    801,396       31,059       832,455       805,726       33,336       839,062  
Consumer:
                                               
Home equity lines of credit
    324,662       6,302       330,964       329,080       7,072       336,152  
Home equity loans
    14,830             14,830       17,588             17,588  
Auto Indirect
    16,741             16,732       24,577             24,577  
Other
    18,601             18,610       15,622             15,622  
         
Total consumer loans
    374,834       6,302       381,136       386,867       7,072       393,939  
Commercial
    132,487       8,037       140,524       133,032       10,364       143,396  
Construction:
                                               
Residential
    18,042       4,445       22,435       19,459       4,463       23,922  
Commercial
    21,433             21,485       21,029             21,029  
         
Total construction
    39,475       4,445       43,920       40,488       4,463       44,951  
         
Total loans
    1,348,192       49,843       1,398,035       1,366,113       55,235       1,421,348  
Net deferred loan (fees) costs
    (1,973 )           (1,973 )     (1,777 )           (1,777 )
         
Total loans, net of deferred loan fees
  $ 1,346,219     $ 49,843     $ 1,396,062     $ 1,364,336     $ 55,235     $ 1,419,571  
         
 
                                               
Noncovered loans
  $ 1,346,192           $ 1,346,219     $ 1,364,336           $ 1,364,336  
Covered loans
          49,843       49,843             55,235       55,235  
         
Total loans
  $ 1,346,192     $ 49,843     $ 1,396,062     $ 1,364,336     $ 55,235     $ 1,419,571  
         
 
                                               
Allowance for loan loss
  $ (41,592 )   (2,370 )   (43,962 )   (40,963 )   (1,608 )   (42,571 )
         
The following is a summary of the change in accretable yield for PCI loans during the periods indicated (in thousands):
                                 
    Three months ended June 30,     Six months ended June 30,  
    2011     2010     2011     2010  
Change in accretable yield:
                               
Balance at beginning of period
  $ 14,399           $ 17,717        
Acquisitions
        $ 23,151             $ 23,151  
Accretion to interest income
    (994 )     (369 )     (2,028 )     (369 )
Reclassification (to) from Nonaccretable difference
    52             (2,232 )      
         
Balance at end of period
  $ 13,457     $ 22,782     $ 13,457     $ 22,782  
         
Throughout these financial statements, and in particular in this Note 4 and Note 5, when we refer to “Loans” or “Allowance for loan losses” we mean all categories of loans, including originated and PCI. When we are not referring to all categories of loans, we will indicate which we are referring to — originated or PCI.

16


Table of Contents

Note 5 — Allowance for Loan Losses
The following tables summarize the activity in the allowance for loan losses, and ending balance of loans, net of unearned fees for the periods indicated.
                                                                                 
    Allowance for Loan Losses — Three months ended June 30, 2011  
    RE Mortgage     Home Equity     Auto     Other             Construction        
(in thousands)   Resid.     Comm.     Lines     Loans     Indirect     Consum.     C&I     Resid.     Comm.     Total  
     
Beginning balance
  $ 3,544     $ 12,027     $ 16,296     $ 911     $ 481     $ 704     $ 6,967     $ 1,395     $ 899     $ 43,224  
Charge-offs
    (321 )     (1,621 )     (1,928 )     (264 )     (100 )     (304 )     (202 )     (395 )     (95 )     (5,230 )
Recoveries
          38       86             56       165       41       20       1       407  
Provision
    (702 )     2,975       2,026       524       (53 )     257       6       677       (149 )     5,561  
     
Ending balance
  $ 2,521     $ 13,419     $ 16,480     $ 1,171     $ 384     $ 822     $ 6,812     $ 1,697     $ 656     $ 43,962  
     
                                                                                 
    Allowance for Loan Losses — Six months ended June 30, 2011  
    RE Mortgage     Home Equity     Auto     Other             Construction        
(in thousands)   Resid.     Comm.     Lines     Loans     Indirect     Consum.     C&I     Resid.     Comm.     Total  
     
Beginning balance
  $ 3,007     $ 12,700     $ 15,054     $ 795     $ 1,229     $ 701     $ 5,991     $ 1,824     $ 1,270     $ 42,571  
Charge-offs
    (1,446 )     (1,989 )     (5,529 )     (264 )     (235 )     (533 )     (1,758 )     (430 )     (95 )     (12,279 )
Recoveries
    112       66       247       2       183       374       62       22       40       1,108  
Provision
    848       2,642       6,708       638       (793 )     280       2,517       281       (559 )     12,562  
     
Ending balance
  $ 2,521     $ 13,419     $ 16,480     $ 1,171     $ 384     $ 822     $ 6,812     $ 1,697     $ 656     $ 43,962  
     
Ending balance:
                                                                               
Individ. evaluated for impairment
  $ 955     $ 2,181     $ 1,408     $ 129     $ 113     $ 22     $ 206     $ 286     $ 509     $ 5,809  
     
Loans pooled for evaluation
  $ 1,552     $ 11,224     $ 14,629     $ 1,042     $ 271     $ 800     $ 4,968     $ 1,150     $ 147     $ 35,783  
     
Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality
  $ 14     $ 14     $ 443                       $ 1,638     $ 261           $ 2,370  
     
                                                                                 
    Loans, net of unearned fees — As of June 30, 2011  
    RE Mortgage     Home Equity     Auto     Other             Construction        
(in thousands)   Resid.     Comm.     Lines     Loans     Indirect     Consum.     C&I     Resid.     Comm.     Total  
     
Ending balance:
                                                                               
Total loans
  $ 127,083     $ 701,674     $ 332,532     $ 14,905     $ 16,767     $ 18,660     $ 140,531     $ 22,479     $ 21,431     $ 1,396,062  
     
Individ. evaluated for impairment
  $ 11,292     $ 65,734     $ 8,271     $ 492     $ 936     $ 93     $ 5,385     $ 6,250     $ 7,329     $ 105,782  
     
Loans pooled for evaluation
  $ 109,393     $ 611,279     $ 317,959     $ 14,413     $ 15,831     $ 18,567     $ 127,109     $ 11,784     $ 14,102     $ 1,240,437  
     
Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality
  $ 6,398     $ 24,661     $ 6,302                       $ 8,037     $ 4,445           $ 49,843  
     

17


Table of Contents

Note 5 — Allowance for Loan Losses (Continued)
The following tables summarize the activity in the allowance for loan losses, and ending balance of loans, net of unearned fees for the periods indicated.
                                                                                 
    Allowance for Loan Losses — Three months ended June 30, 2010  
    RE Mortgage     Home Equity     Auto     Other             Construction        
(in thousands)   Resid.     Comm.     Lines     Loans     Indirect     Consum.     C&I     Resid.     Comm.     Total  
     
Beginning balance
  $ 2,131     $ 6,679     $ 14,428     $ 907     $ 1,645     $ 657     $ 7,067     $ 304     $ 2,522     $ 36,340  
Charge-offs
    (293 )     (1,497 )     (3,095 )     (303 )     (337 )     (543 )     (535 )     (1,782 )     (39 )     (8,424 )
Recoveries
          28       24       7       167       182       103       3             514  
Provision
    1,002       4,153       2,551       1,305       (13 )     302       (455 )     1,748       (593 )     10,000  
     
Ending balance
  $ 2,840     $ 9,363     $ 13,908     $ 1,916     $ 1,462     $ 598     $ 6,180     $ 273     $ 1,890     $ 38,430  
     
Ending balance:
                                                                               
                                                                                 
    Allowance for Loan Losses — Six months ended June 30, 2010  
    RE Mortgage     Home Equity     Auto     Other             Construction        
(in thousands)   Resid.     Comm.     Lines     Loans     Indirect     Consum.     C&I     Resid.     Comm.     Total  
     
Beginning balance
  $ 2,618     $ 5,071     $ 13,483     $ 940     $ 1,986     $ 616     $ 6,958     $ 2,067     $ 1,734     $ 35,473  
Charge-offs
    (748 )     (4,064 )     (5,337 )     (711 )     (863 )     (883 )     (1,061 )     (2,819 )     (39 )     (16,525 )
Recoveries
          55       68       7       327       384       117       24             982  
Provision
    970       8,301       5,694       1,680       12       481       166       1,001       195       18,500  
     
Ending balance
  $ 2,840     $ 9,363     $ 13,908     $ 1,916     $ 1,462     $ 598     $ 6,180     $ 273     $ 1,890     $ 38,430  
     
Ending balance:
                                                                               
Individ. evaluated for impairment
  $ 494     $ 857     $ 2,977     $ 368     $ 461     $ 67     $ 1,147     $ 46     $ 511     $ 6,928  
     
Loans pooled for evaluation
  $ 2,346     $ 8,506     $ 10,931     $ 1,548     $ 1,001     $ 531     $ 5,033     $ 227     $ 1,379     $ 31,502  
     
Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality
                                                           
     
                                                                                 
    Loans, net of unearned fees — As of June 30, 2010  
    RE Mortgage     Home Equity     Auto     Other             Construction        
(in thousands)   Resid.     Comm.     Lines     Loans     Indirect     Consum.     C&I     Resid.     Comm.     Total  
     
Ending balance:
                                                                               
Total loans
  $ 121,638     $ 729,218     $ 346,795     $ 46,580     $ 34,189     $ 15,143     $ 162,503     $ 10,320     $ 34,554     $ 1,500,940  
     
Individ. evaluated for impairment
  $ 7,556     $ 57,485     $ 9,960     $ 1,026     $ 1,759     $ 190     $ 3,351     $ 1,252     $ 12,397     $ 94,976  
     
Loans pooled for evaluation
  $ 106,304     $ 641,933     $ 328,109     $ 45,554     $ 32,430     $ 14,953     $ 147,786     $ 4,330     $ 22,157     $ 1,343,556  
     
Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality
  $ 7,778     $ 29,800     $ 8,726                       $ 11,366     $ 4,738           $ 62,408  
     
As part of the on-going monitoring of the credit quality of the Company’s loan portfolio, management tracks certain credit quality indicators including, but not limited to, trends relating to (i) the level of criticized and classified loans, (ii) net charge-offs, (iii) non-performing loans, and (iv) delinquency within the portfolio.
The Company utilizes a risk grading system to assign a risk grade to each of its loans. Loans are graded on a scale ranging from Pass to Loss. A description of the general characteristics of the risk grades is as follows:
  Pass — This grade represents loans ranging from acceptable to very little or no credit risk. These loans typically meet most if not all policy standards in regard to: loan amount as a percentage of collateral value, debt service coverage, profitability, leverage, and working capital.
  Special Mention — This grade represents “Other Assets Especially Mentioned” in accordance with regulatory guidelines and includes loans that display some potential weaknesses which, if left unaddressed, may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the asset or may inadequately protect the Company’s position in the future. These loans warrant more than normal supervision and attention.
  Substandard — This grade represents “Substandard” loans in accordance with regulatory guidelines. Loans within this rating typically exhibit weaknesses that are well defined to the point that repayment is jeopardized. Loss potential is, however, not necessarily evident. The underlying collateral supporting the credit appears to have sufficient value to protect the Company from loss of principal and accrued interest, or the loan has been written down to the point where this is true. There is a definite need for a well defined workout/rehabilitation program.

18


Table of Contents

  Doubtful — This grade represents “Doubtful” loans in accordance with regulatory guidelines. An asset classified as Doubtful has all the weaknesses inherent in a loan classified Substandard with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions and values, highly questionable and improbable. Pending factors include proposed merger, acquisition, or liquidation procedures, capital injection, perfecting liens on additional collateral, and financing plans.
  Loss — This grade represents “Loss” loans in accordance with regulatory guidelines. A loan classified as Loss is considered uncollectible and of such little value that its continuance as a bankable asset is not warranted. This classification does not mean that the loan has absolutely no recovery or salvage value, but rather that it is not practical or desirable to defer writing off the loan, even though some recovery may be affected in the future. The portion of the loan that is graded loss should be charged off no later than the end of the quarter in which the loss is identified.
The following tables present ending loan balances by loan category and risk grade for the periods indicated:
                                                                                 
    Credit Quality Indicators-As of June 30, 2011  
    RE Mortgage     Home Equity     Auto     Other             Construction        
(in thousands)   Resid.     Comm.     Lines     Loans     Indirect     Consum.     C&I     Resid.     Comm.     Total  
     
Originated loans:
                                                                               
Pass
  $ 104,754     $ 543,687     $ 310,264     $ 14,176     $ 15,261     $ 18,409     $ 116,396     $ 8,353     $ 8,855     $ 1,140,155  
Special mention
    1,282       50,797       1,219             39       11       8,115       3,394       4,990       69,847  
Substandard
    14,649       82,529       14,747       729       1,467       240       7,983       6,287       7,586       136,217  
Loss
                                                           
     
Total
  $ 120,685     $ 677,013     $ 326,230     $ 14,905     $ 16,767     $ 18,660     $ 132,494     $ 18,034     $ 21,431     $ 1,346,219  
     
PCI loans
  $ 6,398     $ 24,661     $ 6,302                       $ 8,037     $ 4,445           $ 49,843  
     
Total loans
  $ 127,083     $ 701,674     $ 332,532     $ 14,905     $ 16,767     $ 18,660     $ 140,531     $ 22,479     $ 21,431     $ 1,396,062  
     
                                                                                 
    Credit Quality Indicators-As of December 31, 2010  
    RE Mortgage     Home Equity     Auto     Other             Construction        
(in thousands)   Resid.     Comm.     Lines     Loans     Indirect     Consum.     C&I     Resid.     Comm.     Total  
     
Originated loans:
                                                                               
Pass
  $ 106,967     $ 543,492     $ 312,315     $ 16,740     $ 22,405     $ 15,363     $ 108,511     $ 8,190     $ 8,940     $ 1,142,923  
Special mention
    1,259       60,171       1,884       23       45       11       14,518       3,395       4,397       85,703  
Substandard
    14,664       75,582       16,538       913       2,207       255       10,020       7,857       7,674       135,710  
     
Total
  $ 122,890     $ 679,245     $ 330,737     $ 17,676     $ 24,657     $ 15,629     $ 133,049     $ 19,442     $ 21,011     $ 1,364,336  
     
PCI loans
  $ 7,597     $ 25,739     $ 7,072                       $ 10,364     $ 4,463           $ 55,235  
     
Total loans
  $ 130,487     $ 704,984     $ 337,809     $ 17,676     $ 24,657     $ 15,629     $ 143,413     $ 23,905     $ 21,011     $ 1,419,571  
     
Consumer loans, whether unsecured or secured by real estate, automobiles, or other personal property, are primarily susceptible to three primary risks; non-payment due to income loss, over-extension of credit and, when the borrower is unable to pay, shortfall in collateral value. Typically non-payment is due to loss of job and will follow general economic trends in the marketplace driven primarily by rises in the unemployment rate. Loss of collateral value can be due to market demand shifts, damage to collateral itself or a combination of the two.
Problem consumer loans are generally identified by payment history of the borrower (delinquency). The Bank manages its consumer loan portfolios by monitoring delinquency and contacting borrowers to encourage repayment, suggest modifications if appropriate, and, when continued scheduled payments become unrealistic, initiate repossession or foreclosure through appropriate channels. Collateral values may be determined by appraisals obtained through Bank approved, licensed appraisers, qualified independent third parties, public value information (blue book values for autos), sales invoices, or other appropriate means. Appropriate valuations are obtained at initiation of the credit and periodically (every 3-12 months depending on collateral type) once repayment is questionable and the loan has been classified.
Commercial real estate loans generally fall into two categories, owner-occupied and non-owner occupied. Loans secured by owner occupied real estate are primarily susceptible to changes in the business conditions of the related business. This may be driven by, among other things, industry changes, geographic business changes, changes in the individual fortunes of the business owner, and general economic conditions and changes in business cycles. These same risks apply to commercial loans whether secured by equipment or other personal property or unsecured. Losses on loans secured by owner occupied real estate, equipment, or other personal property generally are dictated by the value of underlying collateral at the time of default and liquidation of the collateral. When default is driven by issues related specifically to the business owner, collateral values tend to provide better repayment support and may result in little or no loss. Alternatively, when default is driven by more general economic conditions, underlying collateral generally has devalued more and results in larger losses due to default. Loans secured by non-owner occupied real estate are primarily susceptible to risks associated with swings in occupancy or vacancy and related shifts in lease rates, rental rates or room rates. Most often these shifts are a result of changes in general economic or market conditions or overbuilding and resultant over-supply. Losses are dependent on value of underlying collateral at the time of default. Values are generally driven by these same factors and influenced by interest rates and required rates of return as well as changes in occupancy costs.

19


Table of Contents

Construction loans, whether owner occupied or non-owner occupied commercial real estate loans or residential development loans, are not only susceptible to the related risks described above but the added risks of construction itself including cost over-runs, mismanagement of the project, or lack of demand or market changes experienced at time of completion. Again, losses are primarily related to underlying collateral value and changes therein as described above.
Problem commercial loans are generally identified by periodic review of financial information which may include financial statements, tax returns, rent rolls and payment history of the borrower (delinquency). Based on this information the Bank may decide to take any of several courses of action including demand for repayment, additional collateral or guarantors, and, when repayment becomes unlikely through Borrower’s income and cash flow, repossession or foreclosure of the underlying collateral.
Collateral values may be determined by appraisals obtained through Bank approved, licensed appraisers, qualified independent third parties, public value information (blue book values for autos), sales invoices, or other appropriate means. Appropriate valuations are obtained at initiation of the credit and periodically (every 3-12 months depending on collateral type) once repayment is questionable and the loan has been classified.
Once a loan becomes delinquent and repayment becomes questionable, a Bank collection officer will address collateral shortfalls with the borrower and attempt to obtain additional collateral. If this is not forthcoming and payment in full is unlikely, the Bank will estimate its probable loss, using a recent valuation as appropriate to the underlying collateral less estimated costs of sale, and charge the loan down to the estimated net realizable amount. Depending on the length of time until ultimate collection, the Bank may revalue the underlying collateral and take additional charge-offs as warranted. Revaluations may occur as often as every 3-12 months depending on the underlying collateral and volatility of values. Final charge-offs or recoveries are taken when collateral is liquidated and actual loss is known. Unpaid balances on loans after or during collection and liquidation may also be pursued through lawsuit and attachment of wages or judgment liens on borrower’s other assets.
The following table shows the ending balance of current, past due, and nonaccrual originated loans by loan category as of June 30, 2011:
                                                                                 
    Analysis of Past Due and Nonaccrual Originated Loans-As of June 30, 2011  
    RE Mortgage     Home Equity     Auto     Other             Construction        
(in thousands)   Resid.     Comm.     Lines     Loans     Indirect     Consum.     C&I     Resid.     Comm.     Total  
     
Originated loans:
                                                                               
Past due:
                                                                               
30-59 Days
  $ 359     $ 13,138     $ 3,479     $ 318     $ 464     $ 69     $ 1,463     $ 64     $ 5,180     $ 24,534  
60-89 Days
    122       963       2,233       80       184       16       442       337       400       4,777  
> 90 Days
    4,543       10,595       3,256       138       247             2,840       547       476       22,642  
     
Total past due
    5,024       24,696       8,968       536       895       85       4,745       948       6,056       51,953  
Current
    115,661       652,317       317,262       14,369       15,872       18,575       127,749       17,086       15,375       1,294,266  
     
Total loans
  $ 120,685     $ 677,013     $ 326,230     $ 14,905     $ 16,767     $ 18,660     $ 132,494     $ 18,034     $ 21,431     $ 1,346,219  
     
> 90 Days and still accruing
                                                           
     
Nonaccrual loans
  $ 10,623     $ 42,832     $ 7,363     $ 426     $ 864     $ 93     $ 4,180     $ 6,250     $ 1,089     $ 73,720  
     
The following table shows the contractual ending balance of current, past due, and nonaccrual PCI loans by loan category as of June 30, 2011 (this table is prepared on an individual loan basis):
                                                                                 
    Analysis of Past Due and Nonaccrual PCI Loans-As of June 30, 2011  
    RE Mortgage     Home Equity     Auto     Other             Construction        
(in thousands)   Resid.     Comm.     Lines     Loans     Indirect     Consum.     C&I     Resid.     Comm.     Total  
     
PCI Loans:
                                                                               
Past due:
                                                                               
30-59 Days
        $ 333                                   $ 528           $ 861  
60-89 Days
                110                         796                   906  
> 90 Days
          1,549       335                         771       30             2,685  
     
Total past due
          1,882       445                         1,567       558             4,452  
Current
    6,398       22,779       5,857                         6,470       3,887             45,391  
     
Total PCI loans
  $ 6,398     $ 24,661     $ 6,302                       $ 8,037     $ 4,445           $ 49,843  
     
At June 30, 2011, the Company had no nonaccruing PCI loans.

20


Table of Contents

The following table shows the ending balance of current, past due, and nonaccrual originated loans by loan category as of December 31, 2010:
                                                                                 
    Analysis of Past Due and Nonaccrual Originated Loans-As of December 31, 2010  
    RE Mortgage     Home Equity     Auto     Other             Construction        
(in thousands)   Resid.     Comm.     Lines     Loans     Indirect     Consum.     C&I     Resid.     Comm.     Total  
     
Originated loans:
                                                                               
Past due:
                                                                               
30-59 Days
  $ 2,822     $ 11,191     $ 3,546     $ 158     $ 604     $ 68     $ 1,405     $ 270           $ 20,064  
60-89 Days
    1,139       1,864       2,209             401       33       893             275       6,814  
> 90 Days
    7,980       20,748       6,843       694       403       7       401       1,781       612       39,469  
     
Total past due
    11,941       33,803       12,598       852       1,408       108       2,699       2,051       887       66,347  
Current
    110,949       645,442       318,139       16,824       23,249       15,521       130,350       17,391       20,124       1,297,989  
     
Total loans
  $ 122,890     $ 679,245     $ 330,737     $ 17,676     $ 24,657     $ 15,629     $ 133,049     $ 19,442     $ 21,011     $ 1,364,336  
     
> 90 Days and still accruing
        $ 147                                   $ 98           $ 245  
     
Nonaccrual loans
  $ 11,771     $ 38,778     $ 10,604     $ 701     $ 1,296     $ 83     $ 4,618     $ 7,019     $ 872     $ 75,742  
     
The following table shows the contractual ending balance of current, past due, and nonaccrual PCI loans by loan category as of December 31, 2010 (this table is prepared on an individual loan basis):
                                                                                 
    Analysis of Past Due and Nonaccrual PCI Loans-As of December 31, 2010
    RE Mortgage     Home Equity     Auto     Other             Construction        
(in thousands)   Resid.     Comm.     Lines     Loans     Indirect     Consum.     C&I     Resid.     Comm.     Total  
     
PCI Loans:
                                                                               
Past due:
                                                                               
30-59 Days
        $ 1,749                             $ 241                 $ 1,990  
60-89 Days
          353       505                         79                   937  
> 90 Days
    562       300       34                         2,299       358             3,553  
     
Total past due
    562       2,402       539                         2,619       358             6,480  
Current
    7,689       28,197       8,331                         8,797       4,855             57,869  
     
Total PCI loans
  $ 8,251     $ 30,599     $ 8,870                       $ 11,416     $ 5,213           $ 64,349  
     
At December 31, 2010, the Company had no nonaccruing PCI loans.

21


Table of Contents

Impaired originated loans are those where management has concluded that it is probable that the borrower will be unable to pay all amounts due under the contractual terms. The following tables show the recorded investment (financial statement balance), unpaid principal balance, average recorded investment, and interest income recognized for impaired originated loans, segregated by those with no related allowance recorded and those with an allowance recorded for the periods indicated.
                                                                                 
    Impaired Originated Loans-As June 30, 2011
    RE Mortgage     Home Equity     Auto     Other             Construction        
(in thousands)   Resid.     Comm.     Lines     Loans     Indirect     Consum.     C&I     Resid.     Comm.     Total  
     
With no related allowance recorded:
                                                                               
Recorded investment
  $ 7,613     $ 44,873     $ 4,311     $ 362     $ 548     $ 34     $ 4,791     $ 4,501     $ 6,472     $ 73,505  
     
Unpaid principal
  $ 10,165     $ 51,637     $ 7,009     $ 783     $ 1,005     $ 37     $ 5,815     $ 9,280     $ 6,666     $ 92,397  
     
Average recorded Investment
  $ 6,903     $ 45,180     $ 4,833     $ 527     $ 631     $ 42     $ 4,846     $ 5,288     $ 6,541     $ 74,791  
     
Interest income Recognized
  $ 13     $ 814     $ 4     $ 3     $ 6     $ 1     $ 57     $ 2     $ 189     $ 1,089  
     
 
                                                                               
With an allowance recorded:
                                                                               
Recorded investment
  $ 3,679     $ 20,861     $ 3,960     $ 130     $ 388     $ 59     $ 594     $ 1,749     $ 857     $ 32,277  
     
Unpaid principal
  $ 4,069     $ 23,516     $ 4,603     $ 295     $ 476     $ 63     $ 743     $ 2,706     $ 906     $ 37,377  
     
Related allowance
  $ 955     $ 2,181     $ 1,408     $ 129     $ 113     $ 22     $ 206     $ 286     $ 509     $ 5,809  
     
Average recorded Investment
  $ 4,827     $ 15,105     $ 4,661     $ 105     $ 528     $ 47     $ 838     $ 1,300     $ 843     $ 28,254  
     
Interest income Recognized
  $ 17     $ 408     $ 24     $ 1     $ 2           $ 8     (18 )   $ 6     $ 448  
     
At June 30, 2011, $50,337,000 of originated loans were TDR and classified as impaired. The Company did not have any obligations to lend additional funds on these loans as of June 30, 2011.
                                                                                 
    Impaired Originated Loans-As of December 31, 2010  
    RE Mortgage     Home Equity     Auto     Other             Construction        
(in thousands)   Resid.     Comm.     Lines     Loans     Indirect     Consum.     C&I     Resid.     Comm.     Total  
     
With no related allowance recorded:
                                                                               
Recorded investment
  $ 6,192     $ 45,487     $ 5,354     $ 691     $ 714     $ 49     $ 4,900     $ 6,075     $ 6,609     $ 76,071  
     
Unpaid principal
  $ 7,521     $ 52,962     $ 8,755     $ 1,002     $ 1,349     $ 52     $ 5,571     $ 10,854     $ 6,797     $ 94,863  
     
Average recorded Investment
  $ 4,599     $ 32,575     $ 4,688     $ 425     $ 607     $ 66     $ 3,330     $ 8,137     $ 3,962     $ 58,389  
     
Interest income Recognized
  $ 99     $ 1,609     $ 93     $ 17     $ 37     $ 4     $ 186     $ 123     $ 377     $ 2,545  
     
 
                                                                               
With an allowance recorded:
                                                                               
Recorded investment
  $ 5,975     $ 9,349     $ 5,362     $ 79     $ 667     $ 34     $ 1,081     $ 850     $ 828     $ 24,225  
     
Unpaid principal
  $ 6,278     $ 11,122     $ 6,379     $ 82     $ 793     $ 37     $ 1,398     $ 1,235     $ 898     $ 28,222  
     
Related allowance
  $ 1,654     $ 1,042     $ 2,933     $ 78     $ 239     $ 14     $ 590     $ 116     $ 279     $ 6,945  
     
Average recorded Investment
  $ 4,204     $ 5,844     $ 4,373     $ 326     $ 1,112     $ 84     $ 1,285     $ 1,597     $ 563     $ 19,388  
     
Interest income Recognized
  $ 222     $ 506     $ 129     $ 5     $ 17     $ 1     $ 46     $ 14     $ 22     $ 962  
     
At December 31, 2010, $36,423,000 of originated loans were TDR and classified as impaired. The Company had obligations to lend $415,000 of additional funds on these TDR as of December 31, 2010.

22


Table of Contents

Note 6 — Foreclosed Assets
A summary of the activity in the balance of foreclosed assets follows (in thousands):
                                                 
    Six months ended June 30, 2011     Six months ended June 30, 2010  
    Noncovered     Covered     Total     Noncovered     Covered     Total  
         
Beginning balance, net
  $ 5,000     $ 4,913     $ 9,913     $ 3,726           $ 3,726  
Additions/transfers from loans
    4,271             4,271       3,788     $ 4,629       8,417  
Dispositions/sales
    (2,914 )     (846 )     (3,760 )     (1,838 )     ($305 )     (2,143 )
Valuation adjustments
    (493 )     (594 )     (1,087 )     (55 )           (55 )
         
Ending balance, net
  $ 5,864     $ 3,473     $ 9,337     $ 5,621     $ 4,324     $ 9,945  
         
Ending valuation allowance
    ($896 )     ($740 )     ($1,636 )     ($241 )           ($241 )
         
Ending number of foreclosed assets
    47       11       58       26       10       36  
         
Proceeds from sale of foreclosed assets
  $ 3,167     $ 978     $ 4,145     $ 2,192     $ 305     $ 2,497  
         
Gain (loss) on sale of foreclosed assets
  $ 253     $ 132     $ 385     $ 350           $ 350  
         
Note 7 — Premises and Equipment
Premises and equipment were comprised of:
                 
    June 30,     December 31,  
    2011     2010  
    (in thousands)  
Premises
  $ 20,321     $ 19,902  
Furniture and equipment
    24,536       26,009  
     
 
    44,857       45,911  
Less: Accumulated depreciation
    (28,452 )     (30,556 )
     
 
    16,405       15,355  
Land and land improvements
    3,737       3,765  
     
 
  $ 20,142     $ 19,120  
     
Depreciation expense for premises and equipment amounted to $604,000 and $707,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Depreciation expense for premises and equipment amounted to $1,250,000 and $1,407,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Note 8 — Cash Value of Life Insurance
A summary of the activity in the balance of cash value of life insurance follows (in thousands):
                 
    Six months ended June 30,  
    2011     2010  
     
Beginning balance
  $ 50,541     $ 48,694  
Increase in cash value of life insurance
    900       852  
     
Ending balance
  $ 51,441     $ 49,546  
     
The Bank is the owner and beneficiary of 140 life insurance policies, issued by 6 life insurance companies, covering 39 current and former employees and directors (Insured). These life insurance policies are recorded on the Company’s financial statements at their reported cash (surrender) values. As a result of current tax law, and the nature of these policies, the Bank records any increase in cash value of these policies as nontaxable noninterest income. If the Bank decided to surrender any of the policies prior to the death of the insured, such surrender may result in a tax expense related to the life-to-date cumulative increase in cash value of the policy. If the Bank retains such policies until the death of the insured, the Bank would receive nontaxable proceeds from the insurance company equal to the death benefit of the policies. The Bank has entered into Joint Beneficiary Agreements (JBAs) with certain of the insured that for certain of the policies provide some level of sharing of the death benefit, less the cash surrender value, among the Bank and the beneficiaries of the insured upon the receipt of death benefits. See Note 15 of these financial statements for additional information on of JBAs.
Note 9 — Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
The following table summarizes the Company’s goodwill intangible as of the dates indicated.
                                 
    December 31,                     June 30,  
(Dollar in Thousands)   2010     Additions     Reductions     2011  
     
Goodwill
  $ 15,519                 $ 15,519  
     
The following table summarizes the Company’s core deposit intangibles as of the dates indicated.
                                 
    December 31,                     June 30,  
(Dollar in Thousands)   2010     Additions     Reductions     2011  
     
Core deposit intangibles
  $ 3,927                 $ 3,927  
Accumulated amortization
    (3,347 )           (105 )     (3,452 )
     
Core deposit intangibles, net
  $ 580           $ (105 )   $ 475  
     

23


Table of Contents

The Company recorded additions to CDI of $562,000 in conjunction with the Granite acquisition on May 28, 2010. The following table summarizes the Company’s estimated core deposit intangible amortization (dollars in thousands):
         
    Estimated Core Deposit
Years Ended   Intangible Amortization
2011
  $ 145  
2012
    81  
2013
    81  
2014
    80  
2015
    80  
Thereafter
    113  
Note 10 — Mortgage Servicing Rights
The following tables summarize the activity in, and the main assumptions we used to determine the fair value of mortgage servicing rights for the periods indicated (dollars in thousands):
                                 
    Three months ended June 30,     Six months ended June 30,  
    2011     2010     2011     2010  
Mortgage servicing rights:        
Balance at beginning of period
  $ 4,808     $ 4,310     $ 4,605     $ 4,089  
Additions
    172       292       435       562  
Change in fair value
    (162 )     (569 )     (222 )     (618 )
         
Balance at end of period
  $ 4,818     $ 4,033     $ 4,818     $ 4,033  
         
 
Servicing, late and ancillary fees received
  $ 370     $ 315     $ 731     $ 622  
Balance of loans serviced at:
                               
Beginning of period
  $ 583,625     $ 518,803     $ 573,300     $ 505,947  
End of period
  $ 584,113     $ 527,436     $ 584,113     $ 527,436  
Weighted-average prepayment speed (CPR)
                    14.5 %     18.0 %
Discount rate
                    9.0 %     9.0 %
The changes in fair value of MSRs that occurred during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 were mainly due to principal reductions and changes in estimated life of the MSRs.
Note 11 — Indemnification Asset
A summary of the activity in the balance of indemnification asset follows (in thousands):
                                 
    Three months ended June 30,     Six months ended June 30,  
    2011     2010     2011     2010  
         
Beginning balance
  $ 6,689           $ 5,640        
Effect of actual covered losses and change in estimated future covered losses
    204     $ 7,515       1,885     $ 7,515  
Reimbursable expenses (revenue), net
    (19 )           103        
Payments received
    (2,329 )           (3,083 )      
         
Ending balance
  $ 4,545     $ 7,515     $ 4,545     $ 7,515  
         
Note 12 — Other Assets
Other assets were comprised of (in thousands):
                 
    June 30,     December 31,  
    2011     2010  
     
Deferred tax asset, net
  $ 26,786     $ 28,046  
Software
    1,044       1,127  
Prepaid expenses & miscellaneous other assets
    13,804       8,109  
     
Total other assets
  $ 41,634     $ 37,282  
     
The majority of prepaid expenses & miscellaneous other assets at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 consisted of prepaid FDIC assessment and prepaid taxes. In November of 2009, the FDIC adopted an amendment to its assessment regulations to require insured institutions to prepay, on December 30, 2009, their estimated quarterly risk-based assessments for the fourth quarter of calendar 2009 and for all of the calendar years 2010, 2011 and 2012. The amount of the prepayment was generally determined based upon an institution’s assessment rate in effect on September 30, 2009, adjusted to reflect a 5% growth and as an assessment rate increase of three cents per $100 of deposits effective January 1, 2011. The Bank’s prepayment amount was $10,544,000.

24


Table of Contents

Note 13 — Deposits
A summary of the balances of deposits follows (in thousands):
                 
    June 30,     December 31,  
    2011     2010  
     
Noninterest-bearing demand
  $ 419,391     $ 424,070  
Interest-bearing demand
    401,040       395,413  
Savings
    618,413       585,850  
Time certificates, $100,000 and over
    207,843       235,992  
Other time certificates
    190,044       210,848  
     
Total deposits
  $ 1,836,731     $ 1,852,173  
     
Certificate of deposit balances of $5,000,000 and $5,000,000 from the State of California were included in time certificates, $100,000 and over, at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. The Bank participates in a deposit program offered by the State of California whereby the State may make deposits at the Bank’s request subject to collateral and credit worthiness constraints. The negotiated rates on these State deposits are generally more favorable than other wholesale funding sources available to the Bank. Overdrawn deposit balances of $1,733,000 and $1,513,000 were classified as consumer loans at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
Note 14 — Reserve for Unfunded Commitments
The following tables summarize the activity in reserve for unfunded commitments for the periods indicated (dollars in thousands):
                                 
    Three months ended June 30,     Six months ended June 30,  
    2011     2010     2011     2010  
     
Balance at beginning of period
  $ 2,690     $ 3,640     $ 2,640     $ 3,640  
Provision for losses — unfunded commitments
    (50 )     (800 )           (800 )
     
Balance at end of period
  $ 2,640     $ 2,840     $ 2,640     $ 2,840  
     
Note 15 — Other Liabilities
Other liabilities were comprised of (in thousands):
                 
    June 30,     December 31,  
    2011     2010  
     
Deferred compensation
  $ 8,364     $ 8,289  
Supplemental retirement
    10,489       9,873  
Additional minimum pension liability
    5,770       5,770  
Joint beneficiary agreements
    1,964       1,851  
Miscellaneous other liabilities
    2,974       3,387  
     
Total other liabilities
  $ 29,561     $ 29,170  
     
Note 16 — Other Borrowings
A summary of the balances of other borrowings follows:
                 
    June 30,     December 31,  
    2011     2010  
    (in thousands)  
Borrowing under security repurchase agreement, rate is fixed at 4.72% and principal is callable in its entirety by lender on a quarterly basis until final maturity on August 30, 2012.
  $ 50,000     $ 50,000  
Other collateralized borrowings, fixed rate, as of June 30, 2011 of 0.15% payable on July 1, 2011
    9,234       12,020  
     
Total other borrowings
  $ 59,234     $ 62,020  
     
During August 2007, the Company entered into a security repurchase agreement with principal balance of $50,000,000 and terms as described above. As of June 30, 2011, the Company has pledged as collateral and sold under an agreement to repurchase investment securities with fair value of $58,895,000 under this security repurchase agreement. The Company did not enter into any other repurchase agreements during the three months ended June 30, 2011 or the year ended December 31, 2010. The average balance of repurchase agreements during the three months ended June 30, 2011 was $50,000,000, with an average rate of 4.72%.
The Company had $9,234,000 and $12,020,000 of other collateralized borrowings at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. Other collateralized borrowings are generally overnight maturity borrowings from non-financial institutions that are collateralized by securities owned by the Company. As of June 30, 2011, the Company has pledged as collateral and sold under agreements to repurchase investment securities with fair value of $19,374,000 under these other collateralized borrowings.
The Company maintains a collateralized line of credit with the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco. Based on the FHLB stock requirements at June 30, 2011, this line provided for maximum borrowings of $437,764,000 of which none was outstanding, leaving

25


Table of Contents

$437,764,000 available. As of June 30, 2011, the Company has designated loans totaling $980,865,000 as potential collateral under this collateralized line of credit with the FHLB.
The Company maintains a collateralized line of credit with the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. As of June 30, 2011, this line provided for maximum borrowings of $43,407,000 of which none was outstanding, leaving $43,407,000 available. As of June 30, 2011, the Company has designated investment securities with fair value of $750,000 and loans totaling $68,801,000 as potential collateral under this collateralized line of credit with the FRB.
The Company has available unused correspondent banking lines of credit from commercial banks totaling $5,000,000 for federal funds transactions at June 30, 2011.
Note 17 — Junior Subordinated Debt
On July 31, 2003, the Company formed a subsidiary business trust, TriCo Capital Trust I, to issue trust preferred securities. Concurrently with the issuance of the trust preferred securities, the trust issued 619 shares of common stock to the Company for $1,000 per share or an aggregate of $619,000. In addition, the Company issued a Junior Subordinated Debenture to the Trust in the amount of $20,619,000. The terms of the Junior Subordinated Debenture are materially consistent with the terms of the trust preferred securities issued by TriCo Capital Trust I. Also on July 31, 2003, TriCo Capital Trust I completed an offering of 20,000 shares of cumulative trust preferred securities for cash in an aggregate amount of $20,000,000. The trust preferred securities are mandatorily redeemable upon maturity on October 7, 2033 with an interest rate that resets quarterly at three-month LIBOR plus 3.05%. TriCo Capital Trust I has the right to redeem the trust preferred securities on or after October 7, 2008. The trust preferred securities were issued through an underwriting syndicate to which the Company paid underwriting fees of $7.50 per trust preferred security or an aggregate of $150,000. The net proceeds of $19,850,000 were used to finance the opening of new branches, improve bank services and technology, repurchase shares of the Company’s common stock under its repurchase plan and increase the Company’s capital. The trust preferred securities have not been and will not be registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or applicable state securities laws and were sold pursuant to an exemption from registration under the Securities Act of 1933. The trust preferred securities may not be offered or sold in the United States absent registration or an applicable exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and applicable state securities laws.
The $20,619,000 of junior subordinated debentures issued by TriCo Capital Trust I are reflected as junior subordinated debt in the consolidated balance sheets. The common stock issued by TriCo Capital Trust I are recorded in other assets in the consolidated balance sheets.
On June 22, 2004, the Company formed a second subsidiary business trust, TriCo Capital Trust II, to issue trust preferred securities. Concurrently with the issuance of the trust preferred securities, the trust issued 619 shares of common stock to the Company for $1,000 per share or an aggregate of $619,000. In addition, the Company issued a Junior Subordinated Debenture to the Trust in the amount of $20,619,000. The terms of the Junior Subordinated Debenture are materially consistent with the terms of the trust preferred securities issued by TriCo Capital Trust II. Also on June 22, 2004, TriCo Capital Trust II completed an offering of 20,000 shares of cumulative trust preferred securities for cash in an aggregate amount of $20,000,000. The trust preferred securities are mandatorily redeemable upon maturity on July 23, 2034 with an interest rate that resets quarterly at three-month LIBOR plus 2.55%. TriCo Capital Trust II has the right to redeem the trust preferred securities on or after July 23, 2009. The trust preferred securities were issued through an underwriting syndicate to which the Company paid underwriting fees of $2.50 per trust preferred security or an aggregate of $50,000. The net proceeds of $19,950,000 were used to finance the opening of new branches, improve bank services and technology, repurchase shares of the Company’s common stock under its repurchase plan and increase the Company’s capital. The trust preferred securities have not been and will not be registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or applicable state securities laws and were sold pursuant to an exemption from registration under the Securities Act of 1933. The trust preferred securities may not be offered or sold in the United States absent registration or an applicable exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and applicable state securities laws.
The $20,619,000 of junior subordinated debentures issued by TriCo Capital Trust II are reflected as junior subordinated debt in the consolidated balance sheets. The common stock issued by TriCo Capital Trust II is recorded in other assets in the consolidated balance sheets.
The debentures issued by TriCo Capital Trust I and TriCo Capital Trust II, less the common securities of TriCo Capital Trust I and TriCo Capital Trust II, continue to qualify as Tier 1 or Tier 2 capital under interim guidance issued by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Federal Reserve Board).

26


Table of Contents

Note 18 — Commitments and Contingencies
Restricted Cash Balances— Reserves (in the form of deposits with the Federal Reserve Bank) of $18,933,000 and $13,351,000 were maintained to satisfy Federal regulatory requirements at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. These reserves are included in cash and due from banks in the accompanying balance sheets.
Lease Commitments— The Company leases 45 sites under non-cancelable operating leases. The leases contain various provisions for increases in rental rates, based either on changes in the published Consumer Price Index or a predetermined escalation schedule. Substantially all of the leases provide the Company with the option to extend the lease term one or more times following expiration of the initial term. The Company currently does not have any capital leases.
Financial Instruments with Off-Balance-Sheet Risk— The Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit, standby letters of credit, and deposit account overdraft privilege. Those instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of risk in excess of the amount recognized in the balance sheet. The contract amounts of those instruments reflect the extent of involvement the Company has in particular classes of financial instruments.
The Company’s exposure to loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit written is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. The Company uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance sheet instruments. The Company’s exposure to loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for deposit account overdraft privilege is represented by the overdraft privilege amount disclosed to the deposit account holder.
The following table presents a summary of the Bank’s commitments and contingent liabilities:
                 
    June 30,     December 31,  
(in thousands)   2011     2010  
     
Financial instruments whose amounts represent risk:
               
Commitments to extend credit:
               
Commercial loans
  $ 124,090     $ 116,785  
Consumer loans
    378,328       380,269  
Real estate mortgage loans
    17,151       14,366  
Real estate construction loans
    5,043       7,174  
Standby letters of credit
    5,017       5,022  
Deposit account overdraft privilege
    55,993       38,600  
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates of one year or less or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The Company evaluates each customer’s credit worthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by the Company upon extension of credit, is based on Management’s credit evaluation of the customer. Collateral held varies, but may include accounts receivable, inventory, property, plant and equipment, residential properties, and income-producing commercial properties.
Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Those guarantees are primarily issued to support private borrowing arrangements. Most standby letters of credit are issued for one year or less. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers. Collateral requirements vary, but in general follow the requirements for other loan facilities.
The Deposit account overdraft privilege amount represents the unused overdraft privilege available on Demand Deposit accounts covered by the Company’s Overdraft Privilege service. The Company has established a per account overdraft privilege coverage amount for its Demand Deposit accounts which meet the qualification requirements. The overdraft privilege service allows qualifying depositors to overdraft their Demand Deposit account up to an amount that has been established in advance.
Legal Proceedings—During 2007, Visa Inc. (“Visa”) announced that it completed restructuring transactions in preparation for an initial public offering of its Class A stock, and, as part of those transactions, the Bank’s membership interest was exchanged for 16,653 shares of Class B common stock in Visa. In March 2008, Visa completed its initial public offering. Following the initial public offering, the Company received $275,400 proceeds as a mandatory partial redemption of 6,439 shares, reducing the Company’s holdings from 16,653 shares to 10,214 shares of Class B common stock. A conversion ratio of 0.71429 was established for the conversion rate of Class B shares into Class A shares. Using the proceeds from this offering, Visa also established a $3.0 billion escrow account to cover settlements, resolution of pending litigation and related claims (“covered litigation”).

27


Table of Contents

In October 2008, Visa announced that it had reached a settlement with Discover Card related to an antitrust lawsuit. The Bank and other Visa member banks were obligated to fund the settlement and share in losses resulting from this litigation that were not already provided for in the escrow account. In December 2008, Visa deposited additional funds into the escrow account to cover the remaining amount of the settlement. The deposit of funds into the escrow account further reduced the conversion ratio applicable to Class B common stock outstanding from 0.71429 per Class A share to 0.6296 per Class A share.
In July 2009, Visa deposited an additional $700 million into the litigation escrow account. While the outcome of the remaining litigation cases remains unknown, this addition to the escrow account provides additional reserves to cover potential losses. As a result of the deposit, the conversion ratio applicable to Class B common stock outstanding decreased further from 0.6296 per Class A share to 0.5824 per Class A share. In May 2010, Visa deposited an additional $500 million into the litigation escrow account. As a result of the deposit, the conversion ratio applicable to Class B common stock outstanding decreased further from 0.5824 per Class A share to 0.5550 per Class A share. In October 2010, Visa deposited an additional $800 million into the litigation escrow account. As a result of the deposit, the conversion ratio applicable to Class B common stock outstanding decreased further from 0.5550 per Class A share to 0.5102 per Class A share.
The remaining unredeemed shares of Visa Class B common stock are restricted and may not be transferred until the later of (1) three years from the date of the initial public offering or (2) the period of time necessary to resolve the covered litigation. If the funds in the escrow account are insufficient to settle all the covered litigation, Visa may sell additional Class A shares, use the proceeds to settle litigation, and further reduce the conversion ratio. If funds remain in the escrow account after all litigation is settled, the Class B conversion ratio will be increased to reflect that surplus. As of December 31, 2010, the value of the Class A shares was $70.38 per share. Utilizing the new conversion ratio effective in July 2009, the value of unredeemed Class A equivalent shares owned by the Company was $367,000 as of December 31, 2010, and has not been reflected in the accompanying financial statements.
The Company is a defendant in legal actions arising from normal business activities. Management believes, after consultation with legal counsel, that these actions are without merit or that the ultimate liability, if any, resulting from them will not materially affect the Company’s consolidated financial position or results from operations.
Other Commitments and Contingencies—The Company has entered into employment agreements or change of control agreements with certain officers of the Company providing severance payments and accelerated vesting of benefits under supplemental retirement agreements to the officers in the event of a change in control of the Company and termination for other than cause or after a substantial and material change in the officer’s title, compensation or responsibilities.
Mortgage loans sold to investors may be sold with servicing rights retained, with only the standard legal representations and warranties regarding recourse to the Bank. Management believes that any liabilities that may result from such recourse provisions are not significant.
Note 19 — Shareholders’ Equity
Dividends Paid
The Bank paid to the Company cash dividends in the aggregate amounts of $4,035,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2011. The Bank is regulated by the FDIC and the State of California Department of Financial Institutions. Absent approval from the Commissioner of Financial Institutions of California, California banking laws generally limit the Bank’s ability to pay dividends to the lesser of (1) retained earnings or (2) net income for the last three fiscal years, less cash distributions paid during such period.
Shareholders’ Rights Plan
On June 25, 2001, the Company announced that its Board of Directors adopted and entered into a Shareholder Rights Plan designed to protect and maximize shareholder value and to assist the Board of Directors in ensuring fair and equitable benefit to all shareholders in the event of a hostile bid to acquire the Company.
The Company adopted this Rights Plan to protect stockholders from coercive or otherwise unfair takeover tactics. In general terms, the Rights Plan imposes a significant penalty upon any person or group that acquires 15% or more of the Company’s outstanding common stock without approval of the Company’s Board of Directors. The Rights Plan was not adopted in response to any known attempt to acquire control of the Company.
Under the Rights Plan, a dividend of one Preferred Stock Purchase Right was declared for each common share held of record as of the close of business on July 10, 2001. No separate certificates evidencing the rights will be issued unless and until they become exercisable.
The rights generally will not become exercisable unless an acquiring entity accumulates or initiates a tender offer to purchase 15% or more of the Company’s common stock. In that event, each right will entitle the holder, other than the unapproved acquirer and its affiliates, to purchase either the Company’s common stock or shares in an acquiring entity at one-half of market value.
The rights’ initial exercise price, which is subject to adjustment, is $49.00 per right. The Company’s Board of Directors generally will be entitled to redeem the rights at a redemption price of $0.01 per right until an acquiring entity acquires a 15% position. On July 8, 2011, the Company amended the Rights Plan to extend its maturity until July 10, 2021.

28


Table of Contents

Stock Repurchase Plan
On August 21, 2007, the Board of Directors adopted a plan to repurchase, as conditions warrant, up to 500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock on the open market. The timing of purchases and the exact number of shares to be purchased will depend on market conditions. The 500,000 shares authorized for repurchase under this stock repurchase plan represented approximately 3.2% of the Company’s 15,814,662 outstanding common shares as of August 21, 2007. This stock repurchase plan has no expiration date. As of June 30, 2011, the Company had repurchased 166,600 shares under this plan.
Stock Repurchased Under Equity Compensation Plans
During the six months ended June 30, 2011 employees tendered 177,430 shares of the Company’s common stock in lieu of cash to exercise options to purchase shares of the Company’s stock or to pay income taxes related to such exercises as permitted by the Company’s shareholder-approved equity compensation plans. Such tendered shares are considered repurchased shares but are not counted against the repurchase plan noted above.
Note 20 — Stock Options and Other Equity-Based Incentive Instruments
In March 2009, the Company’s Board of Directors adopted the TriCo Bancshares 2009 Equity Incentive Plan (2009 Plan) covering officers, employees, directors of, and consultants to, the Company. The 2009 Plan was approved by the Company’s shareholders in May 2009. The 2009 Plan allows for the granting of the following types of “stock awards” (Awards): incentive stock options, nonstatutory stock options, performance awards, restricted stock, restricted stock unit awards and stock appreciation rights. Subject to certain adjustments, the maximum aggregate number of shares of TriCo’s common stock which may be issued pursuant to or subject to Awards is 650,000. The number of shares available for issuance under the 2009 Plan shall be reduced by: (i) one share for each share of common stock issued pursuant to a stock option or a Stock Appreciation Right and (ii) two shares for each share of common stock issued pursuant to a Performance Award, a Restricted Stock Award or a Restricted Stock Unit Award. When Awards made under the 2009 Plan expire or are forfeited or cancelled, the underlying shares will become available for future Awards under the 2009 Plan. To the extent that a share of common stock pursuant to an Award that counted as two shares against the number of shares again becomes available for issuance under the 2009 Plan, the number of shares of common stock available for issuance under the 2009 Plan shall increase by two shares. Shares awarded and delivered under the 2009 Plan may be authorized but unissued, or reacquired shares. As of June 30, 2011, 215,000 options for the purchase of common shares remain outstanding, and 435,000 remain available for grant, under the 2009 Plan.
In May 2001, the Company adopted the TriCo Bancshares 2001 Stock Option Plan (2001 Plan) covering officers, employees, directors of, and consultants to, the Company. Under the 2001 Plan, the option exercise price cannot be less than the fair market value of the Common Stock at the date of grant except in the case of substitute options. Options for the 2001 Plan expire on the tenth anniversary of the grant date. Vesting schedules under the 2001 Plan are determined individually for each grant. As of June 30, 2011, 913,935 options for the purchase of common shares remain outstanding under the 2001 Plan. No new options may be granted under the 2001 Plan.
Stock option activity is summarized in the following table for the time period indicated:
                                                 
                                    Weighted   Weighted
                                    Average   Average Fair
    Number   Option Price   Exercise   Value on
    of Shares   per Share   Price   Date of Grant
Outstanding at December 31, 2010
    1,425,185     $ 8.05     to   $ 25.91     $ 15.78          
Options granted
              to                  
Options exercised
    (296,250 )   $ 8.05     to   $ 8.20     $ 8.20          
Options forfeited
              to                    
Outstanding at June 30, 2011
    1,128,935     $ 11.72     to   $ 25.91     $ 17.77          
The following table shows the number, weighted-average exercise price, intrinsic value, and weighted average remaining contractual life of options exercisable, options not yet exercisable and total options outstanding as of June 30, 2011:
                         
    Currently     Currently Not     Total  
(dollars in thousands except exercise price)   Exercisable     Exercisable     Outstanding  
Number of options
    918,845       210,090       1,128,935  
Weighted average exercise price
  $ 17.68     $ 18.16     $ 17.77  
Intrinsic value (thousands)
  $ 563     $ 24     $ 587  
Weighted average remaining contractual term (yrs.)
    3.82       7.96       4.59  
The 210,090 options that are not currently exercisable as of June 30, 2011 are expected to vest, on a weighted-average basis, over the next 2.96 years, and the Company is expected to recognize $1,701,000 of pre-tax compensation costs related to these options as they vest.

29


Table of Contents

Note 21 — Noninterest Income and Expenses
The components of other noninterest income were as follows (in thousands):
                                 
    Three months ended June 30,     Six months ended June 30,  
    2011     2010     2011     2010  
         
Service charges on deposit accounts
  $ 3,700     $ 4,443     $ 7,130     $ 8,221  
ATM and interchange fees
    1,776       1,531       3,421       2,899  
Other service fees
    437       362       843       692  
Mortgage banking service fees
    370       315       731       623  
Change in value of mortgage servicing rights
    (162 )     (569 )     (222 )     (618 )
         
Total service charges and fees
    6,121       6,082       11,903       11,817  
         
 
                               
Gain on sale of loans
    495       577       1,220       1,162  
Commissions on sale of non-deposit investment products
    648       362       1,008       629  
Increase in cash value of life insurance
    450       426       900       852  
Change in indemnification asset
    144             1,836        
Gain on sale of foreclosed assets
    185       310       385       350  
Legal settlement
                      400  
Sale of customer checks
    67       54       126       102  
Lease brokerage income
    95       21       128       58  
Gain (loss) on disposal of fixed assets
    (6 )     (15 )     (15 )     (40 )
Commission rebates
    (16 )     (17 )     (33 )     (33 )
Bargain purchase gain on acquisition
          232             232  
Other
    68       72       143       122  
         
Total other noninterest income
    2,130       2,022       5,698       3,834  
         
Total noninterest income
  $ 8,251     $ 8,104     $ 17,601     $ 15,651  
         
The components of noninterest expense were as follows (in thousands):
                                 
    Three months ended June 30,     Six months ended June 30,  
    2011     2010     2011     2010  
         
Base salaries, net of deferred loan origination costs
  $ 7,198     $ 6,990     $ 14,202     $ 13,964  
Incentive compensation
    783       526       1,699       1,072  
Benefits and other compensation costs
    2,734       2,469       5,607       5,099  
         
Total salaries and benefits expense
    10,715       9,985       21,508       20,135  
         
 
                               
Occupancy
    1,402       1,407       2,862       2,736  
Equipment
    880       1,060       1,801       2,034  
Data processing and software
    956       661       1,808       1,336  
ATM network charges
    507       446       989       904  
Telecommunications
    520       461       926       874  
Postage
    219       311       435       558  
Courier service
    221       201       429       398  
Advertising
    739       627       1,171       1,148  
Assessments
    518       812       1,385       1,596  
Operational losses
    118       120       227       187  
Professional fees
    573       704       860       1,420  
Foreclosed assets expense
    115       66       282       263  
Provision for foreclosed asset losses
    638       55       1,087       55  
Change in reserve for unfunded commitments
    (50 )     (800 )           (800 )
Intangible amortization
    20       72       105       137  
Other
    2,004       2,220       3,891       4,230  
         
Total other noninterest expense
    9,380       8,423       18,258       17,076  
         
Total noninterest income
  $ 20,095     $ 18,408     $ 39,766     $ 37,211  
         

30


Table of Contents

Note 22 — Income Taxes
The provisions for income taxes applicable to income before taxes differ from amounts computed by applying the statutory Federal income tax rates to income before taxes. The effective tax rate and the statutory federal income tax rate are reconciled for the periods indicated as follows:
                                 
    Three months ended June 30,     Six months ended June 30,  
    2011     2010     2011     2010  
         
Federal statutory income tax rate
    35.0 %     35.0 %     35.0 %     35.0 %
State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit
    5.7       3.8       5.7       4.1  
Tax-exempt interest on municipal obligations
    (1.1 )     (3.5 )     (1.1 )     (3.3 )
Increase in cash value of insurance policies
    (3.6 )     (8.1 )     (3.6 )     (7.4 )
Other
    0.2       0.7       0.2       0.5  
         
Effective Tax Rate
    36.2 %     27.9 %     36.2 %     29.0 %
         
Note 23 — Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share represents income available to common shareholders divided by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share reflects additional common shares that would have been outstanding if dilutive potential common shares had been issued, as well as any adjustments to income that would result from assumed issuance. Potential common shares that may be issued by the Company relate solely from outstanding stock options, and are determined using the treasury stock method. Earnings per share have been computed based on the following:
                                 
    Three months ended     Six months ended  
    June 30,     June 30,  
(in thousands)   2011     2010     2011     2010  
     
Net income
  $ 2,771     $ 1,320     $ 5,571     $ 2,878  
Average number of common shares outstanding
    15,922       15,860       15,891       15,841  
Effect of dilutive stock options
    32       248       98       250  
     
Average number of common shares outstanding used to calculate diluted earnings per share
    15,954       16,108       15,989       16,091  
     
Options excluded from diluted earnings per share because the effect of these optioins was antidilutive
    826       341       795       362  
Note 24 — Comprehensive Income
Accounting principles generally require that recognized revenue, expenses, gains and losses be included in net income. Although certain changes in assets and liabilities, such as unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities, are reported as a separate component of the equity section of the balance sheet, such items, along with net income, are components of comprehensive income. The components of other comprehensive income and related tax effects are as follows:
                                 
    Three months ended     Six months ended  
    June 30,     June, 30  
    2011     2010     2011     2010  
     
(in thousands)
                               
Unrealized holding gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities
  $ 2,689     $ 3,588     $ 2,302     $ 3,200  
Tax effect
    (1,131 )     (1,183 )     (968 )     (1,346 )
     
Unrealized holding gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities, net of tax
  $ 1,558     $ 2,405     $ 1,334     $ 1,854  
     
The components of accumulated other comprehensive loss, included in shareholders’ equity, are as follows:
                 
    June 30,     December 31,  
    2011     2010  
    (in thousands)  
     
Net unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities
  $ 10,238     $ 7,936  
Tax effect
    (4,305 )     (3,337 )
     
Unrealized holding gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities, net of tax
    5,933       4,599  
     
 
               
Minimum pension liability
    (5,770 )     (5,770 )
Tax effect
    2,426       2,426  
     
Minimum pension liability, net of tax
    (3,344 )     (3,344 )
     
 
               
Joint beneficiary agreement liability
    96       96  
     
Tax effect
    (41 )     (41 )
     
Joint beneficiary agreement liability, net of tax
    55       55  
     
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
  $ 2,644     $ 1,310  
     

31


Table of Contents

Note 25 — Retirement Plans
The Company has supplemental retirement plans for current and former directors and key executives. These plans are non-qualified defined benefit plans and are unsecured and unfunded. The Company has purchased insurance on the lives of the participants and intends (but is not required) to use the cash values of these policies to pay the retirement obligations. The following table sets forth the net periodic benefit cost recognized for the plans:
                                 
    Three months ended June 30,     Six months ended June 30,  
(in thousands)   2011     2010     2011     2010  
         
Net pension cost included the following components:
                               
Service cost-benefits earned during the period
  $ 165     $ 131     $ 329     $ 262  
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation
    210       191       420       382  
Amortization of net obligation at transition
                1       1  
Amortization of prior service cost
    38       38       76       76  
Recognized net actuarial loss
    97       55       193       109  
         
Net periodic pension cost
  $ 510     $ 415     $ 1,019     $ 830  
         
 
Company contributions to pension plans
  $ 226     $ 189     $ 403     $ 379  
Pension plan payouts to participants
  $ 226     $ 189     $ 403     $ 379  
For the year ending December 31, 2011, the Company currently expects to contribute and pay out as benefits $758,000 to participants under the plans.
Note 26 — Related Party Transactions
Certain directors, officers, and companies with which they are associated were customers of, and had banking transactions with, the Company or the Bank in the ordinary course of business. It is the Company’s policy that all loans and commitments to lend to officers and directors be made on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with other borrowers of the Bank.
The following table summarizes the activity in these loans for the periods indicated (in thousands):
         
Balance December 31, 2009
  $ 5,245  
Advances/new loans
    1,999  
Removed/payments
    (4,673 )
 
     
Balance December 31, 2010
  $ 2,571  
Advances/new loans
    200  
Removed/payments
    (629 )
 
     
Balance June 30, 2011
  $ 2,142  
 
     
Note 27 — Fair Value Measurement
The Company utilizes fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities and to determine fair value disclosures. In estimating fair value, the Company utilizes valuation techniques that are consistent with the market approach, income approach, and/or the cost approach. Inputs to valuation techniques include the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability including assumptions about the risk inherent in a particular valuation technique, the effect of a restriction on the sale or use of an asset and the risk of nonperformance. Securities available-for-sale and mortgage servicing rights are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Additionally, from time to time, the Company may be required to record at fair value other assets on a nonrecurring basis, such as loans held for sale, loans held for investment and certain other assets. These nonrecurring fair value adjustments typically involve application of lower of cost or market accounting or impairment write-downs of individual assets. Transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy are recognized on the actual date of the event or circumstances that caused the transfer, which generally corresponds with the Company’s quarterly valuation process.
The Company groups assets and liabilities at fair value in three levels, based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded and the observable nature of the assumptions used to determine fair value. These levels are:
Level 1 —     Valuation is based upon quoted prices for identical instruments traded in active markets.
 
Level 2 —    Valuation is based upon quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market.
 
Level 3 —    Valuation is generated from model-based techniques that use at least one significant assumption not observable in the market. These unobservable assumptions reflect estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Valuation techniques include use of option pricing models, discounted cash flow models and similar techniques.
Securities available-for-sale - Securities available-for-sale are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Fair value measurement is based upon quoted prices, if available. If quoted prices are not available, fair values are measured using independent pricing models or other model-based valuation techniques such as the present value of future cash flows, adjusted for the security’s credit rating, prepayment

32


Table of Contents

assumptions and other factors such as credit loss assumptions. Level 1 securities include those traded on an active exchange, such as the New York Stock Exchange, U.S. Treasury securities that are traded by dealers or brokers in active over-the-counter markets and money market funds. Level 2 securities include mortgage-backed securities issued by government sponsored entities, municipal bonds and corporate debt securities. Securities classified as Level 3 include asset-backed securities in less liquid markets.
Loans held for sale — Loans held for sale are carried at the lower of cost or market value. The fair value of loans held for sale is based on what secondary markets are currently offering for loans with similar characteristics. As such, we classify those loans subjected to nonrecurring fair value adjustments as Level 2.
Impaired originated loans — originated loans are not recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. However, from time to time, an originated loan is considered impaired and an allowance for loan losses is established. Originated loans for which it is probable that payment of interest and principal will not be made in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement are considered impaired. The fair value of an impaired originated loan is estimated using one of several methods, including collateral value, market value of similar debt, enterprise value, liquidation value and discounted cash flows. Those impaired originated loans not requiring an allowance represent loans for which the fair value of the expected repayments or collateral exceed the recorded investments in such loans. Impaired originated loans where an allowance is established based on the fair value of collateral require classification in the fair value hierarchy. When the fair value of the collateral is based on an observable market price or a current appraised value which uses substantially observable data, the Company records the impaired originated loan as nonrecurring Level 2. When an appraised value is not available or management determines the fair value of the collateral is further impaired below the appraised value, or the appraised value contains a significant unobservable assumption, and there is no observable market price, the Company records the impaired originated loan as nonrecurring Level 3.
Foreclosed assets - Foreclosed assets include assets acquired through, or in lieu of, loan foreclosure. Foreclosed assets are held for sale and are initially recorded at fair value at the date of foreclosure, establishing a new cost basis. Subsequent to foreclosure, management periodically performs valuations and the assets are carried at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell. The fair value of foreclosed assets is established using current real estate appraisals. Revenue and expenses from operations and changes in the valuation allowance are included in other noninterest expense. The Company records foreclosed assets as nonrecurring Level 3.
Mortgage servicing rights - Mortgage servicing rights are carried at fair value. A valuation model, which utilizes a discounted cash flow analysis using a discount rate and prepayment speed assumptions is used in the computation of the fair value measurement. While the prepayment speed assumption is currently quoted for comparable instruments, the discount rate assumption currently requires a significant degree of management judgment. As such, the Company classifies mortgage servicing rights subjected to recurring fair value adjustments as Level 3.
The table below presents the recorded amount of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis (in thousands):
                                 
Fair value at June 30, 2011   Total     Level 1     Level 2     Level 3  
     
Securities available-for-sale:
                               
Obligations of U.S. government corporations and agencies
  $ 252,832           $ 252,832        
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
    12,160             12,160        
Mortgage servicing rights
    4,818                   4,818  
     
Total assets measured at fair value
  $ 269,810           $ 264,992     $ 4,818  
     
                                 
Fair value at December 31, 2010   Total     Level 1     Level 2     Level 3  
     
Securities available-for-sale:
                               
Obligations of U.S. government corporations and agencies
  $ 264,181           $ 264,181        
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
    12,541             12,541        
Corporate debt securities
    549             549        
Mortgage servicing rights
    4,605                   4,605  
     
Total assets measured at fair value
  $ 281,876           $ 277,271     $ 4,605  
     

33


Table of Contents

The following table provides a reconciliation of assets and liabilities measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) on a recurring basis during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010. The amount included in the “Transfer into Level 3” column represents the beginning balance of an item in the period (interim quarter) for which it was designated as a Level 3 fair value measure (in thousands):
                                         
                    Change                
    Beginning     Transfers     Included             Ending  
Three months ended June 30,   Balance     into Level 3     in Earnings     Issuances     Balance  
     
2011: Mortgage servicing rights
  $ 4,808           (162 )   $ 172     $ 4,818  
2010: Mortgage servicing rights
  $ 4,310           (569 )   $ 292     $ 4,033  
                                         
                    Change                
    Beginning     Transfers     Included             Ending  
Six months ended June 30,   Balance     into Level 3     in Earnings     Issuances     Balance  
     
2011: Mortgage servicing rights
  $ 4,605           (222 )   $ 435     $ 4,818  
2010: Mortgage servicing rights
  $ 4,089           (618 )   $ 562     $ 4,033  
The tables below present the recorded amount of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, as of the dates indicated, that had a write-down or an additional allowance provided during the periods indicated (in thousands):
                                 
As of June 30, 2011   Total     Level 1     Level 2     Level 3  
Fair value:
                               
Impaired originated loans
  $ 37,189                 $ 37,189  
Noncovered foreclosed assets
    5,864                   5,864  
Covered foreclosed assets
    3,473                   3,473  
     
Total assets measured at fair value
  $ 46,526                 $ 46,526  
     
                                 
As of June 30, 2010   Total     Level 1     Level 2     Level 3  
Fair value:
                               
Impaired originated loans
  $ 24,992                 $ 24,992  
Noncovered foreclosed assets
    5,621                   5,621  
Covered foreclosed assets
    4,324                   4,324  
     
Total assets measured at fair value
  $34,937               $ 34,937  
     
The following table presents the losses resulting from nonrecurring fair value adjustments that occurred in the periods indicated:
                                 
    Three months ended     Six months ended  
    June 30,     June 30,  
(in thousands)   2011     2010     2011     2010  
     
Impaired originated loan
  $ 5,551     $ 4,686     $ 7,676     $ 6,821  
Non-covered foreclosed assets
    425       55       493       55  
Covered foreclosed assets
    213             594        
     
Total loss from nonrecurring fair value adjustments
  $ 6,189     $ 4,741     $ 8,763     $ 6,876  
     
In addition to the methods and assumptions used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instrument noted above, the following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of other classes of financial instruments for which it is practical to estimate the fair value.
Short-term Instruments - Cash and due from banks, fed funds purchased and sold, accrued interest receivable and payable, and short-term borrowings are considered short-term instruments. For these short-term instruments their carrying amount approximates their fair value.
Securities - For all securities, fair values are based on quoted market prices or dealer quotes.
Restricted Equity Securities - The carrying value of restricted equity securities approximates fair value as the shares can only be redeemed by the issuing institution at par.
Originated loans - The fair value of variable rate originated loans is the current carrying value. The interest rates on these originated loans are regularly adjusted to market rates. The fair value of other types of fixed rate originated loans is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using current rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings for the same remaining maturities. The allowance for loan losses is a reasonable estimate of the valuation allowance needed to adjust computed fair values for credit quality of certain originated loans in the portfolio.
PCI Loans - PCI loans are measured at estimated fair value on the date of acquisition. Carrying value is calculated as the present value of expected cash flows and approximates fair value.

34


Table of Contents

Cash Value of Life Insurance - The fair values of insurance policies owned are based on the insurance contract’s cash surrender value.
FDIC Indemnification Asset — The FDIC indemnification asset is recorded at fair value, based on the discounted value of expected future cash flows under the loss-share agreement.
Deposit Liabilities - The fair value of demand deposits, savings accounts, and certain money market deposits is the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. These values do not consider the estimated fair value of the Company’s core deposit intangible, which is a significant unrecognized asset of the Company. The fair value of time deposits and other borrowings is based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows.
Other Borrowings - The fair value of other borrowings is calculated based on the discounted value of the contractual cash flows using current rates at which such borrowings can currently be obtained.
Junior Subordinated Debentures - The fair value of junior subordinated debentures is estimated using a discounted cash flow model. The future cash flows of these instruments are extended to the next available redemption date or maturity date as appropriate based upon the spreads of recent issuances or quotes from brokers for comparable bank holding companies compared to the contractual spread of each junior subordinated debenture measured at fair value.
Commitments to Extend Credit and Standby Letters of Credit - The fair value of commitments is estimated using the fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the present credit worthiness of the counter parties. For fixed rate loan commitments, fair value also considers the difference between current levels of interest rates and the committed rates. The fair value of letters of credit is based on fees currently charged for similar agreements or on the estimated cost to terminate them or otherwise settle the obligation with the counter parties at the reporting date.
Fair values for financial instruments are management’s estimates of the values at which the instruments could be exchanged in a transaction between willing parties. These estimates are subjective and may vary significantly from amounts that would be realized in actual transactions. In addition, other significant assets are not considered financial assets including, any mortgage banking operations, deferred tax assets, and premises and equipment. Further, the tax ramifications related to the realization of the unrealized gains and losses can have a significant effect on the fair value estimates and have not been considered in any of these estimates.
The estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments are as follows:
                                 
    June 30, 2011   December 31, 2010
    Carrying     Fair     Carrying     Fair  
    Amount     Value     Amount     Value  
    (in thousands)   (in thousands)
Financial assets:
                               
Cash and due from banks
  $ 52,874     $ 52,784     $ 57,254     $ 57,254  
Cash at Federal Reserve and other banks
    338,180       338,180       313,812       313,812  
Securities available-for-sale
    264,992       264,992       277,271       277,271  
Restricted equity securities
    9,199       9,199       9,133       9,133  
Loans held for sale
    4,379       4,379       4,988       4,988  
Loans, net
    1,396,062     1,461,021     1,377,000       1,451,151  
Cash value of life insurance
    51,441       51,441       50,541       50,541  
Mortgage servicing rights
    4,818       4,818       4,605       4,605  
Indemnification asset
    4,545       4,545       5,640       5,640  
Financial liabilities:
                               
Deposits
    1,836,731     1,839,626     1,852,173       1,854,763  
Other borrowings
    59,234       61,716       62,020       65,716  
Junior subordinated debt
    41,238       23,093       41,238       21,444  
                                 
    Contract   Fair   Contract   Fair
    Amount   Value   Amount   Value
         
Off-balance sheet:
                               
Commitments
  $ 524,612     $ 5,246     $ 518,595     $ 5,186  
Standby letters of credit
    5,017       50       5,022       50  
Overdraft privilege commitments
    55,993       560       38,600       386  

35


Table of Contents

TRICO BANCSHARES
Financial Summary
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts; unaudited)
                                 
    Three months ended   Six months ended
    June 30,   June 30,
    2011   2010   2011   2010
     
Net Interest Income (FTE)
  $ 21,833     $ 22,245     $ 43,620     $ 44,346  
Provision for loan losses
    (5,561 )     (10,000 )     (12,562 )     (18,500 )
Noninterest income
    8,251       8,104       17,601       15,651  
Noninterest expense
    (20,095 )     (18,408 )     39,766       (37,211 )
Provision for income taxes (FTE)
    (1,657 )     (621 )     (3,322 )     (1,408 )
     
Net income
  $ 2,771     $ 1,320     $ 5,571     $ 2,878  
     
 
                               
Earnings per share:
                               
Basic
  $ 0.17     $ 0.08     $ 0.35     $ 0.18  
Diluted
  $ 0.17     $ 0.08     $ 0.35     $ 0.18  
Per share:
                               
Dividends paid
  $ 0.09     $ 0.09     $ 0.18     $ 0.22  
Book value at period end
  $ 12.82     $ 12.76                  
Tangible book value at period end
  $ 11.82     $ 11.74                  
 
                               
Average common shares outstanding
    15,922       15,860       15,891       15,841  
Average diluted common shares outstanding
    15,953       16,108       15,988       16,091  
Shares outstanding at period end
    15,979       15,860                  
At period end:
                               
Loans, net
  $ 1,352,100     $ 1,466,669                  
Total assets
    2,176,184       2,224,645                  
Total deposits
    1,836,731       1,889,949                  
Other borrowings
    59,234       60,452                  
Junior subordinated debt
    41,238       41,238                  
Shareholders’ equity
  $ 204,915     $ 202,422                  
 
                               
Financial Ratios:
                               
During the period (annualized):
                               
Return on assets
    0.51 %     0.24 %     0.51 %     0.26 %
Return on equity
    5.39 %     2.61 %     5.44 %     2.82 %
Net interest margin1
    4.31 %     4.41 %     4.31 %     4.40 %
Net loan charge-offs to average loans
    1.38 %     2.16 %     1.60 %     2.12 %
Efficiency ratio1
    66.8 %     60.7 %     65.0 %     62.0 %
Average equity to average assets
    9.38 %     9.29 %     9.34 %     9.35 %
At period end:
                               
Equity to assets
    9.42 %     8.43 %                
Total capital to risk-adjusted assets
    14.55 %     13.55 %                
 
1   Fully taxable equivalent (FTE)

36


Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
General
As TriCo Bancshares (referred to in this report as “we”, “our” or the “Company”) has not commenced any business operations independent of Tri Counties Bank (the “Bank”), the following discussion pertains primarily to the Bank. Average balances, including such balances used in calculating certain financial ratios, are generally comprised of average daily balances for the Company. Within Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, interest income and net interest income are generally presented on a fully tax-equivalent (FTE) basis. The presentation of interest income and net interest income on a FTE basis is a common practice within the banking industry. Interest income and net interest income are shown on a non-FTE basis in the Part I — Financial Information section of this Form 10-Q, and a reconciliation of the FTE and non-FTE presentations is provided below in the discussion of net interest income.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The Company’s discussion and analysis of its financial condition and results of operations are based upon the Company’s consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires the Company to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, the Company evaluates its estimates, including those that materially affect the financial statements and are related to the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, investments, mortgage servicing rights, fair value measurements, retirement plans and intangible assets. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. The Company’s policies related to estimates on the allowance for loan losses, other than temporary impairment of investments and impairment of intangible assets, can be found in Note 1 to the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and the related notes included as Item 1 of this report.
As the Company has not commenced any business operations independent of the Bank, the following discussion pertains primarily to the Bank. Average balances, including balances used in calculating certain financial ratios, are generally comprised of average daily balances for the Company. Within Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, certain performance measures including interest income, net interest income, net interest yield, and efficiency ratio are generally presented on a fully tax-equivalent (FTE) basis. The Company believes the use of these non-generally accepted accounting principles (non-GAAP) measures provides additional clarity in assessing its results.
On May 28, 2010, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency closed Granite Community Bank (“Granite”), Granite Bay, California and appointed the FDIC as receiver. That same date, the Bank assumed the banking operations of Granite from the FDIC under a whole bank purchase and assumption agreement with loss sharing. Under the terms of the loss sharing agreement, the FDIC will cover a substantial portion of any future losses on loans, related unfunded loan commitments, other real estate owned (OREO)/foreclosed assets and accrued interest on loans for up to 90 days. The FDIC will absorb 80% of losses and share in 80% of loss recoveries on the covered assets acquired from Granite. The loss sharing arrangements for non-single family residential and single family residential loans are in effect for 5 years and 10 years, respectively, and the loss recovery provisions are in effect for 8 years and 10 years, respectively, from the acquisition date. With this agreement, the Bank added one traditional bank branch in each of Granite Bay and Auburn, California. This acquisition is consistent with the Bank’s community banking expansion strategy and provides further opportunity to fill in the Bank’s market presence in the greater Sacramento, California market. The Company refers to loans and foreclosed assets that are covered by loss share agreements as “covered loans” and “covered foreclosed assets”, respectively. In addition, the Company refers to loans purchased or obtained in a business combination as “purchased credit impaired” (PCI) loans, or “purchased non-credit impaired” (PNCI) loans. The Company refers to loans that it originates as “originated” loans. As of June30, 2011, the Company has no loans that it classifies as PNCI loans.
Geographical Descriptions
For the purpose of describing the geographical location of the Company’s loans, the Company has defined northern California as that area of California north of, and including, Stockton; central California as that area of the State south of Stockton, to and including, Bakersfield; and southern California as that area of the State south of Bakersfield.

37


Table of Contents

Results of Operations
Overview
The following discussion and analysis is designed to provide a better understanding of the significant changes and trends related to the Company and the Bank’s financial condition, operating results, asset and liability management, liquidity and capital resources and should be read in conjunction with the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company and the Notes thereto located at Item 1 of this report.
Following is a summary of the components of fully taxable equivalent (“FTE”) net income for the periods indicated (in thousands):
                                 
    Three months ended     Six months ended  
    June 30,     June 30,  
    2011     2010     2011     2010  
Net Interest Income (FTE)
  $ 21,833     $ 22,245     $ 43,620     $ 44,346  
Provision for loan losses
    (5,561 )     (10,000 )     (12,562 )     (18,500 )
Noninterest income
    8,251       8,104       17,601       15,651  
Noninterest expense
    (20,095 )     (18,408 )     (39,766 )     (37,211 )
Provision for income taxes (FTE)
    (1,657 )     (621 )     (3,322 )     (1,408 )
     
Net income
  $ 2,771     $ 1,320     $ 5,571     $ 2,878  
     
Net Interest Income
The Company’s primary source of revenue is net interest income, or the difference between interest income on interest-earning assets and interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities. Following is a summary of the components of net interest income for the periods indicated (dollars in thousands):
                                 
    Three months ended     Six month ended  
    June 30,     June 30,  
    2011     2010     2011     2010  
     
Interest income
  $ 24,467     $ 25,776     $ 48,901     $ 51,712  
Interest expense
    (2,714 )     (3,642 )     (5,444 )     (7,600 )
FTE adjustment
    80       111       163       234  
     
Net interest income (FTE)
  $ 21,833     $ 22,245     $ 43,620     $ 44,346  
     
Net interest margin (FTE)
    4.31 %     4.41 %     4.31 %     4.40 %
     
Net interest income (FTE) during the second quarter of 2011 decreased $412,000 (1.9%) from the same period in 2010 to $21,833,000. The decrease in net interest income (FTE) was due to a 0.10% (ten basis points) decrease in net interest margin (FTE) to 4.31% and a $69,486,000 (4.7%) decrease in average balance of loans. Much of the ten basis point decrease in net interest margin was due to the fact that despite historically low deposit rates, the ability to deploy deposits into some interest-earning asset other than short-term low-yield interest-earning cash at the Federal Reserve Bank has been limited. This limitation is the result of weak loan demand and investment yields that have been unattractive given their interest rate risk profile.
Net interest income (FTE) during the six months ended June 30, 2011 decreased $726,000 (1.6%) from the same period in 2010 to $43,620,000. The decrease in net interest income (FTE) was due to a 0.09% (nine basis points) decrease in net interest margin (FTE) to 4.31% and a $71,420,000 (4.9%) decrease in average balance of loans. Much of the nine basis point decrease in net interest margin was due to the fact that despite historically low deposit rates, the ability to deploy deposits into some interest-earning asset other than short-term low-yield interest-earning cash at the Federal Reserve Bank has been limited. This limitation is the result of weak loan demand and investment yields that have been unattractive given their interest rate risk profile.

38


Table of Contents

Summary of Average Balances, Yields/Rates and Interest Differential
The following table presents, for the periods indicated, information regarding the Company’s consolidated average assets, liabilities and shareholders’ equity, the amounts of interest income from average interest-earning assets and resulting yields, and the amount of interest expense paid on interest-bearing liabilities. Average loan balances include nonperforming loans. Interest income includes proceeds from loans on nonaccrual loans only to the extent cash payments have been received and applied to interest income. Yields on securities and certain loans have been adjusted upward to reflect the effect of income thereon exempt from federal income taxation at the current statutory tax rate (dollars in thousands).
                                                 
    For the three months ended  
    June 30, 2011     June 30, 2010  
            Interest     Rates             Interest     Rates  
    Average     Income/     Earned     Average     Income/     Earned  
    Balance     Expense     /Paid     Balance     Expense     /Paid  
         
Assets:
                                               
Loans
  $ 1,393,989     $ 21,735       6.24 %   $ 1,463,475     $ 22,701       6.20 %
Investment securities — taxable
    271,089       2,354       3.47 %     278,799       2,733       3.92 %
Investment securities — nontaxable
    11,839       216       7.31 %     15,502       299       7.71 %
Cash at Federal Reserve and other banks
    351,512       242       0.28 %     261,910       154       0.24 %
         
Total interest-earning assets
    2,028,429       24,547       4.84 %     2,019,686       25,887       5.13 %
Other assets
    164,222                       171,974                  
 
                                           
Total assets
  $ 2,192,651                     $ 2,191,660                  
 
                                           
 
                                               
Liabilities and shareholders’ equity:
                                               
Interest-bearing demand deposits
    408,109       358       0.35 %     386,788       586       0.61 %
Savings deposits
    613,924       372       0.24 %     541,710       613       0.45 %
Time deposits
    406,436       1,072       1.06 %     544,320       1,528       1.12 %
Other borrowings
    59,139       600       4.06 %     61,629       602       3.91 %
Junior subordinated debt
    41,238       312       3.03 %     41,238       313       3.04 %
         
Total interest-bearing liabilities
    1,528,846       2,714       0.71 %     1,575,685       3,642       0.92 %
Noninterest-bearing deposits
    424,331                       376,300                  
Other liabilities
    33,711                       36,147                  
Shareholders’ equity
    205,763                       203,528                  
 
                                           
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
  $ 2,192,651                     $ 2,191,660                  
 
                                           
Net interest spread(1)
                    4.13 %                     4.21 %
Net interest income and interest margin(2)
          $ 21,833       4.31 %           $ 22,245       4.41 %
                         
 
(1)     Net interest spread represents the average yield earned on interest-earning assets minus the average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities.
 
(2)   Net interest margin is computed by calculating the difference between interest income and interest expense, divided by the average balance of interest-earning assets.

39


Table of Contents

Summary of Average Balances, Yields/Rates and Interest Differential (continued)
                                                 
    For the six months ended  
    June 30, 2011     June 30, 2010  
            Interest     Rates             Interest     Rates  
    Average     Income/     Earned     Average     Income/     Earned  
    Balance     Expense     /Paid     Balance     Expense     /Paid  
         
Assets:
                                               
Loans
  $ 1,395,160     $ 43,457       6.23 %   $ 1,466,580     $ 45,514       6.21 %
Investment securities — taxable
    273,793       4,735       3.46 %     271,988       5,494       4.04 %
Investment securities — nontaxable
    11,951       439       7.34 %     16,406       630       7.68 %
Cash at Federal Reserve and other banks
    345,453       433       0.25 %     259,317       308       0.24 %
         
Total interest-earning assets
    2,026,357       49,064       4.84 %     2,014,291       51,946       5.16 %
Other assets
    164,650                       166,108                  
 
                                           
Total assets
  $ 2,191,007                     $ 2,180,399                  
 
                                           
Liabilities and shareholders’ equity:
                                               
Interest-bearing demand deposits
    405,188       707       0.35 %     377,724       1,201       0.64 %
Savings deposits
    603,004       739       0.25 %     531,978       1,255       0.47 %
Time deposits
    419,301       2,183       1.04 %     552,293       3,329       1.21 %
Other borrowings
    59,181       1,193       4.03 %     61,736       1,196       3.87 %
Junior subordinated debt
    41,238       622       3.02 %     41,238       619       3.00 %
         
Total interest-bearing liabilities
    1,527,912       5,444       0.71 %     1,564,969       7,600       0.97 %
Noninterest-bearing deposits
    424,710                       375,159                  
Other liabilities
    33,736                       36,407                  
Shareholders’ equity
    204,649                       203,864                  
 
                                           
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
  $ 2,191,007                     $ 2,180,399                  
 
                                           
Net interest spread(1)
                    4.13 %                     4.19 %
Net interest income and interest margin(2)
          $ 43,620       4.31 %           $ 44,346       4.40 %
                         
 
(1)   Net interest spread represents the average yield earned on interest-earning assets minus the average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities.
 
(2)   Net interest margin is computed by calculating the difference between interest income and interest expense, divided by the average balance of interest-earning assets.

40


Table of Contents

Summary of Changes in Interest Income and Expense due to Changes in Average Asset and Liability Balances and Yields Earned and Rates Paid
The following table sets forth a summary of the changes in interest income and interest expense from changes in average asset and liability balances (volume) and changes in average interest rates for the periods indicated. Changes not solely attributable to volume or rates have been allocated in proportion to the respective volume and rate components (in thousands).
                         
    Three months ended June 30, 2011  
    compared with three months  
    ended June 30, 2010  
    Volume     Rate     Total  
     
Increase (decrease) in interest income:
                       
Loans
  $ (1,077 )   $ 111     $ (966 )
Investment securities
    (117 )     (345 )     (462 )
Cash at Federal Reserve and other banks
    54       34       88  
     
Total interest-earning assets
    (1,140 )     (200 )     (1,340 )
     
Increase (decrease) in interest expense:
                       
Interest-bearing demand deposits
    33       (261 )     (228 )
Savings deposits
    81       (322 )     (241 )
Time deposits
    (386 )     (70 )     (456 )
Other borrowings
    (24 )     22       (2 )
Junior subordinated debt
          (1 )     (1 )
     
Total interest-bearing liabilities
    (296 )     (632 )     (928 )
     
Increase (decrease) in Net Interest Income
  $ (844 )   $ 432     $ (412 )
     
                         
    Six months ended June 30, 2011  
    compared with six months  
    ended June 30, 2010  
    Volume     Rate     Total  
     
Increase (decrease) in interest income:
                       
Loans
  $ (2,218 )   $ 161     $ (2,057 )
Investment securities
    (56 )     (894 )     (950 )
Cash at Federal Reserve and other banks
    103       22       125  
     
Total interest-earning assets
    (2,171 )     (711 )     (2,882 )
     
Increase (decrease) in interest expense:
                       
Interest-bearing demand deposits
    88       (582 )     (494 )
Savings deposits
    167       (683 )     (516 )
Time deposits
    (805 )     (341 )     (1,146 )
Other borrowings
    (49 )     46       (3 )
Junior subordinated debt
          3       3  
     
Total interest-bearing liabilities
    (599 )     (1,557 )     (2,156 )
     
Increase (decrease) in Net Interest Income
  $ (1,572 )   $ 846     $ (726 )
     

41


Table of Contents

Provision for Loan Losses
The Company provided $5,561,000 for loan losses during the three months ended June 30, 2011 versus $10,000,000 during the three months ended June 30, 2010. The allowance for loan losses increased $738,000 from $43,224,000 at March 31, 2011 to $43,962,000 at June 30, 2011. The provision for loan losses and increase in the allowance for loan and lease losses during the three months ended June 30, 2011 were primarily the result of changes in the make-up of the loan portfolio and the Bank’s loss factors in reaction to losses in the construction, commercial real estate, commercial & industrial (C&I), home equity and auto indirect loan portfolios.
The Company provided $7,001,000 for loan losses during the three months ended March 31, 2011 versus $8,500,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2010. The allowance for loan losses increased $653,000 from $42,571,000 at December 31, 2010 to $43,224,000 at March 31, 2011. The provision for loan losses and increase in the allowance for loan and lease losses during the three months ended March 31, 2011 were primarily the result of changes in the make-up of the loan portfolio and the Bank’s loss factors in reaction to increased losses in the construction, commercial real estate, commercial & industrial (C&I), home equity and auto indirect loan portfolios.
Management re-evaluates its originated loan portfolio loss ratios and assumptions quarterly and makes changes as appropriate based upon, among other things, changes in loss rates experienced, collateral support for underlying loans, changes and trends in the economy, and changes in the loan mix. Management also re-evaluates expected cash flows for its PCI loan portfolio quarterly and makes changes as appropriate based upon, among other things, changes in loan repayment experience, changes in loss rates experienced, and collateral support for underlying loans.
The provision for loan losses related to originated loans is based on management’s evaluation of inherent risks in the originated loan portfolio and a corresponding analysis of the allowance for loan losses. The provision for loan losses related to PCI loans is based on changes in estimated cash flows expected to be collected on PCI loans. Additional discussion on loan quality, our procedures to measure loan impairment, and the allowance for loan losses is provided under the heading Asset Quality and Non-Performing Assets below.
Noninterest Income
The following table summarizes the Company’s noninterest income for the periods indicated (dollars in thousands):
                                 
    Three months ended June 30,     Six months ended June 30,  
    2011     2010     2011     2010  
         
Service charges on deposit accounts
  $ 3,700     $ 4,443     $ 7,130     $ 8,221  
ATM and interchange fees
    1,776       1,531       3,421       2,899  
Other service fees
    437       362       843       692  
Mortgage banking service fees
    370       315       731       623  
Change in value of mortgage servicing rights
    (162 )     (569 )     (222 )     (618 )
         
Total service charges and fees
    6,121       6,082       11,903       11,817  
         
Gain on sale of loans
    495       577       1,220       1,162  
Commissions on sale of non-deposit investment products
    648       362       1,008       629  
Increase in cash value of life insurance
    450       426       900       852  
Change in indemnification asset
    144             1,836        
Gain on sale of foreclosed assets
    185       310       385       350  
Legal settlement
                      400  
Sale of customer checks
    67       54       126       102  
Lease brokerage income
    95       21       128       58  
Gain (loss) on disposal of fixed assets
    (6 )     (15 )     (15 )     (40 )
Commission rebates
    (16 )     (17 )     (33 )     (33 )
Bargain purchase gain on acquisition
          232             232  
Other
    68       72       143       122  
         
Total other noninterest income
    2,130       2,022       5,698       3,834  
         
Total noninterest income
  $ 8,251     $ 8,104     $ 17,601     $ 15,651  
         
Noninterest income increased $147,000 (1.8%) to $8,251,000 during the three months ended June 30, 2011 when compared to the three months ended June 30, 2010. Service charges on deposit accounts were down $743,000 (16.7%) due to new overdraft regulations that became effective on July 1, 2010 and caused a decrease in non-sufficient funds fees. ATM fees and interchange income was up $245,000 (16.0%) due to increased customer point-of-sale transactions that are the result of

42


Table of Contents

incentives for such usage. Overall, mortgage banking activities, which includes mortgage banking servicing fees, change in value of mortgage servicing rights, and gain on sale of loans, accounted for $703,000 of noninterest income during the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $323,000 during the three months ended June 30, 2010. Commissions on sale of nondeposit investment products increased $286,000 (79.0%) during the three months ended June 30, 2011. The change in indemnification asset of $144,000 recorded during the three months ended June 30, 2011 is primarily due to an increase in estimated loan losses from the loan portfolio and foreclosed assets acquired in the Granite acquisition on May 28, 2010, and the fact that such losses are generally “covered” at the rate of 80% by the FDIC. The actual increase in estimated losses is reflected in decreased interest income, increased provision for loan losses and/or increased provision for foreclosed asset losses. The Company recorded a bargain purchase gain of $232,000 related to the Granite acquisition during the three months ended June 30, 2010.
Noninterest income increased $1,950,000 (12.5%) to $17,601,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2011 when compared to the six months ended June 30, 2010. Service charges on deposit accounts were down $1,091,000 (13.3%) due to new overdraft regulations that became effective on July 1, 2010 and caused a decrease in non-sufficient funds fees. ATM fees and interchange income was up $522,000 (18.0%) due to increased customer point-of-sale transactions that are the result of incentives for such usage. Overall, mortgage banking activities, which includes mortgage banking servicing fees, change in value of mortgage servicing rights, and gain on sale of loans, accounted for $1,729,000 of noninterest income during the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $1,167,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2010. Commissions on sale of nondeposit investment products increased $379,000 (60.3%) during the six months ended June 30, 2011. The change in indemnification asset of $1,836,000 recorded during the six months ended June 30, 2011 is primarily due to an increase in estimated loan losses from the loan portfolio and foreclosed assets acquired in the Granite acquisition on May 28, 2010, and the fact that such losses are generally “covered” at the rate of 80% by the FDIC. The actual increase in estimated losses is reflected in decreased interest income, increased provision for loan losses and/or increased provision for foreclosed asset losses. The Company recorded a bargain purchase gain of $232,000 related to the Granite acquisition and income of $400,000 related to a legal settlement during the six months ended June 30, 2010.
Noninterest Expense
The following table summarizes the Company’s other noninterest expense for the periods indicated (dollars in thousands):
                                 
    Three months ended June 30,     Six months ended June 30,  
    2011     2010     2011     2010  
             
Base salaries, net of deferred loan origination costs
  $ 7,198     $ 6,990     $ 14,202     $ 13,964  
Incentive compensation
    783       526       1,699       1,072  
Benefits and other compensation costs
    2,734       2,469       5,607       5,099  
             
Total salaries and benefits expense
    10,715       9,985       21,508       20,135  
             
 
Occupancy
    1,402       1,407       2,862       2,736  
Equipment
    880       1,060       1,801       2,034  
Data processing and software
    956       661       1,808       1,336  
ATM network charges
    507       446       989       904  
Telecommunications
    520       461       926       874  
Postage
    219       311       435       558  
Courier service
    221       201       429       398  
Advertising
    739       627       1,171       1,148  
Assessments
    518       812       1,385       1,596  
Operational losses
    118       120       227       187  
Professional fees
    573       704       860       1,420  
Foreclosed assets expense
    115       66       282       263  
Provision for foreclosed asset losses
    638       55       1,087       55  
Change in reserve for unfunded commitments
    (50 )     (800 )           (800 )
Intangible amortization
    20       72       105       137  
Other
    2,004       2,220       3,891       4,230  
             
Total other noninterest expense
    9,380       8,423       18,258       17,076  
             
Total noninterest income
  $ 20,095     $ 18,408     $ 39,766     $ 37,211  
             
 
Average full time equivalent staff
    672       655       671       653  
Noninterest expense to revenue (FTE)
    66.8 %     60.7 %     65.0 %     62.0 %

43


Table of Contents

Salary and benefit expenses increased $730,000 (7.3%) to $10,715,000 during the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2010. Base salaries increased $208,000 (3.0%) to $7,198,000 during the three months ended June 30, 2011. The increase in base salaries was mainly due to a 2.6% increase in average full time equivalent staff to 672. Incentive and commission related salary expenses increased $257,000 (48.9%) to $783,000 during three months ended June 30, 2011 due primarily to increases in production related incentives and incentives tied to net income. Benefits expense, including retirement, medical and workers’ compensation insurance, and taxes, increased $265,000 (10.7%) to $2,734,000 during the three months ended June 30, 2011 primarily due to increases in stock option vesting, supplemental retirement plan expenses, and employer taxes related to option exercises.
Other noninterest expenses increased $957,000 (11.4%) to $9,380,000 during the three months ended June 30, 2011 when compared to the three months ended June 30, 2010. Changes in the various categories of other noninterest expense are reflected in the table above. The changes are indicative of the economic environment which has led to increases, or fluctuations, in professional loan collection expenses, provision for foreclosed asset losses, and foreclosed asset expenses.
Salary and benefit expenses increased $1,373,000 (6.8%) to $21,508,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2010. Base salaries increased $238,000 (1.7%) to $14,202,000 during the six months ended June, 2011. The increase in base salaries was mainly due to a 2.8% increase in average full time equivalent staff to 671. Incentive and commission related salary expenses increased $627,000 (58.5%) to $1,699,000 during six months ended June 30, 2011 due primarily to increases in production related incentives and incentives tied to net income. Benefits expense, including retirement, medical and workers’ compensation insurance, and taxes, increased $508,000 (10.0%) to $5,607,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2011 primarily due to increases in stock option vesting, supplemental retirement plan expenses, and employer taxes related to option exercises.
Other noninterest expenses increased $1,182,000 (6.9%) to $18,258,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2011 when compared to the six months ended June 30, 2010. Changes in the various categories of other noninterest expense are reflected in the table above. The changes are indicative of the economic environment which has led to increases, or fluctuations, in professional loan collection expenses, provision for foreclosed asset losses, and foreclosed asset expenses.
Income Taxes
The effective tax rate on income was 36.3% and 27.9% for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The effective tax rate was greater than the federal statutory tax rate due to state tax expense of $384,000 and $108,000, respectively, in these periods. Tax-exempt income of $136,000 and $188,000, respectively, from investment securities, and $450,000 and $426,000, respectively, from increase in cash value of life insurance in these periods, along with relatively low levels of net income before taxes, helped to reduce the effective tax rate.
The effective tax rate on income was 36.2% and 29.0% for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The effective tax rate was greater than the federal statutory tax rate due to state tax expense of $765,000 and $259,000, respectively, in these periods. Tax-exempt income of $276,000 and $396,000, respectively, from investment securities, and $900,000 and $852,000, respectively, from increase in cash value of life insurance in these periods, along with relatively low levels of net income before taxes, helped to reduce the effective tax rate.

44


Table of Contents

Financial Condition
Investment Securities
Investment securities available for sale decreased $12,279,000 to $264,992,000 as of June 30, 2011, as compared to $277,271,000 at December 31, 2010. This decrease is attributable to purchases of $25,456,000 of investment securities available for sale offset by proceeds from maturities of $39,352,000 of investment securities available for sale, an increase in fair value of investments securities available for sale of $2,302,000, and amortization of net purchase price premiums of $685,000.
The following table presents the available for sale investment securities portfolio by major type as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:
                                 
    June 30, 2011     December 31, 2010  
(dollars in thousands)     Fair Value     %     Fair Value     %  
Securities Available-for-Sale:
                               
Obligations of U.S. government corporations and agencies
  $ 252,832       95.4 %   $ 264,181       95.3 %
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
    12,160       4.6 %     12,541       4.5 %
Corporate debt securities
                549       0.2 %
             
Total securities available-for-sale
  $ 264,992       100.0 %   $ 277,271       100.0 %
             
Additional information about the investment portfolio is provided in Note 3 of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Restricted Equity Securities
Restricted equity securities were $9,199,000 at June 30, 2011 and $9,133,000 at December 31, 2010. The entire balance of restricted equity securities at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 represent the Bank’s investment in the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco (“FHLB”).
FHLB stock is carried at par and does not have a readily determinable fair value. While technically these are considered equity securities, there is no market for the FHLB stock. Therefore, the shares are considered as restricted investment securities. Management periodically evaluates FHLB stock for other-than-temporary impairment. Management’s determination of whether these investments are impaired is based on its assessment of the ultimate recoverability of cost rather than by recognizing temporary declines in value. The determination of whether a decline affects the ultimate recoverability of cost is influenced by criteria such as (1) the significance of any decline in net assets of the FHLB as compared to the capital stock amount for the FHLB and the length of time this situation has persisted, (2) commitments by the FHLB to make payments required by law or regulation and the level of such payments in relation to the operating performance of the FHLB, (3) the impact of legislative and regulatory changes on institutions and, accordingly, the customer base of the FHLB, and (4) the liquidity position of the FHLB.
As a member of the FHLB system, the Company is required to maintain a minimum level of investment in FHLB stock based on specific percentages of its outstanding mortgages, total assets, or FHLB advances. The Company may request redemption at par value of any stock in excess of the minimum required investment. Stock redemptions are at the discretion of the FHLB.
Loans
The Bank concentrates its lending activities in four principal areas: real estate mortgage loans (residential and commercial loans), consumer loans, commercial loans (including agricultural loans), and real estate construction loans. The interest rates charged for the loans made by the Bank vary with the degree of risk, the size and maturity of the loans, the borrower’s relationship with the Bank and prevailing money market rates indicative of the Bank’s cost of funds.
The majority of the Bank’s loans are direct loans made to individuals, farmers and local businesses. The Bank relies substantially on local promotional activity and personal contacts by bank officers, directors and employees to compete with other financial institutions. The Bank makes loans to borrowers whose applications include a sound purpose, a viable repayment source and a plan of repayment established at inception and generally backed by a secondary source of repayment.

45


Table of Contents

The following table shows the Company’s loan balances, including net deferred loan costs, as of the dates indicated:
                 
    June 30,     December 31,  
(in thousands)   2011     2010  
Real estate mortgage
  $ 828,757     $ 835,471  
Consumer
    382,864       395,771  
Commercial
    140,531       143,413  
Real estate construction
    43,910       44,916  
     
Total loans
  $ 1,396,062     $ 1,419,571  
     
The following table shows the Company’s loan balances, including net deferred loan costs, as a percentage of total loans for the periods indicated:
                 
    June 30,     December 31,  
    2011     2010  
Real estate mortgage
    59.4 %     58.8 %
Consumer
    27.4 %     27.9 %
Commercial
    10.1 %     10.1 %
Real estate construction
    3.1 %     3.2 %
     
Total loans
    100.0 %     100.0 %
     
At June 30, 2011 loans, including net deferred loan costs, totaled $1,396,062,000 which was a 1.7% ($23,509,000) decrease over the balances at December 31, 2010. During the three months ended June 30, 2011, loans, including net deferred loan costs, increased $8,402,000 and, excluding the Granite acquisition, represented the first quarterly increase in loan balances since the quarter ended December 31, 2008.
In connection with the FDIC-assisted acquisition of certain of the assets and liabilities of Granite on May 28, 2010, the Bank entered into a loss-sharing agreement with the FDIC that covered approximately $85 million of Granite’s assets. The Bank shares in the losses on the asset pools (loans, and foreclosed loan collateral) covered under the loss-sharing agreement. Pursuant to the terms of the loss sharing agreement, the FDIC is obligated to reimburse the Bank for 80% of losses with respect to covered assets. The Bank will reimburse the FDIC for 80% of recoveries with respect to losses for which the FDIC paid the Bank under the loss sharing agreement. We refer to the loans covered by the loss sharing agreement as “covered loans.” We referred to our loans that are not covered by the loss-sharing agreement as “noncovered loans.” In addition, we refer to loans purchased or obtained in a business combination as “purchased credit impaired” (PCI) loans, or “purchased non-credit impaired” (PNCI) loans. The Company refers to loans that it originates as “originated” loans. As of June 30, 2011, the Company has no loans that it classifies as PNCI loans.
Asset Quality and Nonperforming Assets
Nonperforming Assets
Loans originated by the Company, i.e., not purchased or acquired in a business combination, are reported at the principal amount outstanding, net of deferred loan fees and costs. Loan origination and commitment fees and certain direct loan origination costs are deferred, and the net amount is amortized as an adjustment of the related loan’s yield over the actual life of the loan. Originated loans on which the accrual of interest has been discontinued are designated as nonaccrual loans.
Originated loans are placed in nonaccrual status when reasonable doubt exists as to the full, timely collection of interest or principal, or a loan becomes contractually past due by 90 days or more with respect to interest or principal and is not well secured and in the process of collection. When an originated loan is placed on nonaccrual status, all interest previously accrued but not collected is reversed. Income on such loans is then recognized only to the extent that cash is received and where the future collection of principal is probable. Interest accruals are resumed on such loans only when they are brought fully current with respect to interest and principal and when, in the judgment of Management, the loan is estimated to be fully collectible as to both principal and interest.
An allowance for loan losses for originated loans is established through a provision for loan losses charged to expense. Originated loans and deposit related overdrafts are charged against the allowance for loan losses when Management believes that the collectability of the principal is unlikely or, with respect to consumer installment loans, according to an established delinquency schedule. The allowance is an amount that Management believes will be adequate to absorb probable losses

46


Table of Contents

inherent in existing loans and leases, based on evaluations of the collectability, impairment and prior loss experience of loans and leases. The evaluations take into consideration such factors as changes in the nature and size of the portfolio, overall portfolio quality, loan concentrations, specific problem loans, and current economic conditions that may affect the borrower’s ability to pay. The Company defines an originated loan as impaired when it is probable the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Impaired originated loans are measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s original effective interest rate. As a practical expedient, impairment may be measured based on the loan’s observable market price or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. When the measure of the impaired loan is less than the recorded investment in the loan, the impairment is recorded through a valuation allowance.
In situations related to originated loans where, for economic or legal reasons related to a borrower’s financial difficulties, the Company grants a concession for other than an insignificant period of time to the borrower that the Company would not otherwise consider, the related loan is classified as a troubled debt restructuring (TDR). The Company strives to identify borrowers in financial difficulty early and work with them to modify to more affordable terms before their loan reaches nonaccrual status. These modified terms may include rate reductions, principal forgiveness, payment forbearance and other actions intended to minimize the economic loss and to avoid foreclosure or repossession of the collateral. In cases where the Company grants the borrower new terms that provide for a reduction of either interest or principal, the Company measures any impairment on the restructuring as noted above for impaired loans. TDR loans are classified as impaired until they are fully paid off or charged off. Loans that are in nonaccrual status at the time they become TDR loans, remain in nonaccrual status until the borrower demonstrates a sustained period of performance which the Company generally believes to be six consecutive months of payments, or equivalent. Otherwise, TDR loans are subject to the same nonaccrual and charge-off policies as noted above with respect to their restructured principal balance.
Credit risk is inherent in the business of lending. As a result, the Company maintains an allowance for loan losses to absorb losses inherent in the Company’s originated loan portfolio. This is maintained through periodic charges to earnings. These charges are included in the Consolidated Income Statements as provision for loan losses. All specifically identifiable and quantifiable losses are immediately charged off against the allowance. However, for a variety of reasons, not all losses are immediately known to the Company and, of those that are known, the full extent of the loss may not be quantifiable at that point in time. The balance of the Company’s allowance for originated loan losses is meant to be an estimate of these unknown but probable losses inherent in the portfolio.
The Company formally assesses the adequacy of the allowance for originated loan losses on a quarterly basis. Determination of the adequacy is based on ongoing assessments of the probable risk in the outstanding originated loan portfolio, and to a lesser extent the Company’s originated loan commitments. These assessments include the periodic re-grading of credits based on changes in their individual credit characteristics including delinquency, seasoning, recent financial performance of the borrower, economic factors, changes in the interest rate environment, growth of the portfolio as a whole or by segment, and other factors as warranted. Loans are initially graded when originated. They are re-graded as they are renewed, when there is a new loan to the same borrower, when identified facts demonstrate heightened risk of nonpayment, or if they become delinquent. Re-grading of larger problem loans occurs at least quarterly. Confirmation of the quality of the grading process is obtained by independent credit reviews conducted by consultants specifically hired for this purpose and by various bank regulatory agencies.
The Company’s method for assessing the appropriateness of the allowance for originated loan losses includes specific allowances for impaired originated loans and leases, formula allowance factors for pools of credits, and allowances for changing environmental factors (e.g., interest rates, growth, economic conditions, etc.). Allowance factors for loan pools are based on historical loss experience by product type. Allowances for impaired loans are based on analysis of individual credits. Allowances for changing environmental factors are Management’s best estimate of the probable impact these changes have had on the originated loan portfolio as a whole. The allowance for originated loans is included in the allowance for loan losses.
Acquired loans are valued as of acquisition date in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification (“FASB ASC”) Topic 805, Business Combinations. Loans purchased with evidence of credit deterioration since origination for which it is probable that all contractually required payments will not be collected are referred to as purchased credit impaired (PCI) loans. PCI loans are accounted for under FASB ASC Topic 310-30, Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality. In addition, because of the significant credit discounts associated with the loans acquired in the Granite acquisition, the Company elected to account for all loans acquired in the Granite acquisition under FASB ASC Topic 310-30, and classify them all as PCI loans. Under FASB ASC Topic 805 and FASB ASC Topic 310-30, PCI loans are recorded at fair value at acquisition date, factoring in credit losses expected to be

47


Table of Contents

incurred over the life of the loan. Accordingly, an allowance for loan losses is not carried over or recorded as of the acquisition date. Fair value is defined as the present value of the future estimated principal and interest payments of the loan, with the discount rate used in the present value calculation representing the estimated effective yield of the loan. The difference between contractual future payments and estimated future payments is referred to as the nonaccretable difference. The difference between estimated future payments and the present value of the estimated future payments is referred to as the accretable yield. The accretable yield represents the amount that is expected to be recorded as interest income over the remaining life of the loan. If after acquisition, the Company determines that the future cash flows of a PCI loan are expected to be more than the originally estimated, an increase in the discount rate (effective yield) would be made such that the newly increased accretable yield would be recognized, on a level yield basis, over the remaining estimated life of the loan. If after acquisition, the Company determines that the future cash flows of a PCI loan are expected to be less than the previously estimated, the discount rate would first be reduced until the present value of the reduced cash flow estimate equals the previous present value however, the discount rate may not be lowered below its original level. If the discount rate has been lowered to its original level and the present value has not been sufficiently lowered, an allowance for loan loss would be established through a provision for loan losses charged to expense to decrease the present value to the required level. If the estimated cash flows improve after an allowance has been established for a loan, the allowance may be partially or fully reversed depending on the improvement in the estimated cash flows. Only after the allowance has been fully reversed may the discount rate be increased. PCI loans are put on nonaccrual status when cash flows cannot be reasonably estimated. PCI loans are charged off when evidence suggests cash flows are not recoverable. Foreclosed assets from PCI loans are recorded in foreclosed assets at fair value with the fair value at time of foreclosure representing cash flow from the loan. ASC 310-30 allows PCI loans with similar risk characteristics and acquisition time frame to be “pooled” and have their cash flows aggregated as if they were one loan.
Loans are also categorized as “covered” or “noncovered”. Covered loans refer to loans covered by a Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) loss sharing agreement. Noncovered loans refer to loans not covered by a Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) loss sharing agreement.
Originated loans are reviewed on an individual basis for reclassification to nonaccrual status when any one of the following occurs: the loan becomes 90 days past due as to interest or principal, the full and timely collection of additional interest or principal becomes uncertain, the loan is classified as doubtful by internal credit review or bank regulatory agencies, a portion of the principal balance has been charged off, or the Company takes possession of the collateral. Loans that are placed on nonaccrual even though the borrowers continue to repay the loans as scheduled are classified as “performing nonaccrual” and are included in total nonperforming loans. The reclassification of loans as nonaccrual does not necessarily reflect Management’s judgment as to whether they are collectible.
Interest income on originated nonaccrual loans that would have been recognized during the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, if all such loans had been current in accordance with their original terms, totaled $1,703,000 and $1,715,000, respectively. Interest income actually recognized on these originated loans during the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 was $448,000 and $300,000, respectively.
Interest income on originated nonaccrual loans that would have been recognized during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, if all such loans had been current in accordance with their original terms, totaled $3,304,000 and $3,541,000, respectively. Interest income actually recognized on these originated loans during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 was $556,000 and $617,000, respectively.
The Company’s policy is to place originated loans 90 days or more past due on nonaccrual status. In some instances when an originated loan is 90 days past due Management does not place it on nonaccrual status because the loan is well secured and in the process of collection. A loan is considered to be in the process of collection if, based on a probable specific event, it is expected that the loan will be repaid or brought current. Generally, this collection period would not exceed 30 days. Loans where the collateral has been repossessed are classified as foreclosed assets.
Management considers both the adequacy of the collateral and the other resources of the borrower in determining the steps to be taken to collect nonaccrual loans. Alternatives that are considered are foreclosure, collecting on guarantees, restructuring the loan or collection lawsuits.

48


Table of Contents

The following tables set forth the amount of the Bank’s nonperforming assets as of the dates indicated. For purposes of the following table, PCI loans that are ninety days past and still accruing are not considered nonperforming loans:
                 
    June 30,     December 31,  
(dollars in thousands)   2011     2010  
     
Performing nonaccrual loans
  $ 51,078     $ 36,518  
Nonperforming nonaccrual loans
    22,642       39,224  
     
Total nonaccrual loans
    73,720       75,742  
Originated loans 90 days past due and still accruing
          245  
     
Total nonperforming loans
    73,720       75,987  
Noncovered foreclosed assets
    5,864       5,000  
Covered foreclosed assets
    3,473       4,913  
     
Total nonperforming assets
  $ 83,057     $ 85,900  
     
U.S. government, including its agencies and its government-sponsored agencies, guaranteed portion of nonperforming loans
  $ 3,496     $ 3,937  
Indemnified portion of covered foreclosed assets
  $ 2,778     $ 3,930  
PCI loans 90 days past due and still accruing
  $ 2,685     $ 3,553  
 
Nonperforming assets to total assets
    3.82 %     3.92 %
Nonperforming loans to total loans
    5.28 %     5.35 %
Allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans
    60 %     56 %
The following tables and narrative describe the activity in the balance of nonperforming assets for the periods indicated:
                                                                 
    Balance at             Advances/     Pay-             Transfers to             Balance at  
    March 31,     New     Capitalized     downs     Charge-offs/     Foreclosed     Category     June 30,  
(dollars in thousands):   2011   NPA     Costs     /Sales     Write-downs     Assets     Changes     2011  
Real estate mortgage:
                                                               
Residential
  $ 12,148     $ 416     $ 9     $ (831 )   $ (321 )   $ (797 )         $ 10,624  
Commercial
    35,834       10,659       1       (1,680 )     (1,621 )     (361 )           42,832  
Consumer
                                                               
Home equity lines
    9,033       1,627       466       (486 )     (1,928 )     (1,337 )           7,363  
Home equity loans
    717       29       57       (41 )     (264 )     (84 )           426  
Auto indirect
    1,058       133             (228 )     (100 )                 863  
Other consumer
    78       78       1       (12 )     (21 )                 93  
Commercial
    4,330       909             (857 )     (202 )                 4,180  
Construction:
                                                               
Residential
    6,653       205       29       (73 )     (395 )     (169 )           6,250  
Commercial
    1,202                   (18 )     (95 )                 1,089  
     
Total nonperforming loans
    71,053       14,025       563       (4,226 )     (4,947 )     (2,748 )           73,720  
Noncovered foreclosed assets
    4,472                   (931 )     (425 )     2,748             5,864  
Covered foreclosed assets
    4,511                   (825 )     (213 )                 3,473  
     
Total nonperforming assets
  $ 80,036     $ 14,025     $ 563     $ (5,982 )   $ (5,585 )               $ 83,057  
     
Nonperforming assets increased during the second quarter of 2011 by $3,021,000 (3.8%) to $83,057,000 at June 30, 2011 compared to $80,036,000 at March 31, 2011. The increase in nonperforming assets during the second quarter of 2011 was primarily the result of new nonperforming loans of $14,025,000, advances on existing nonperforming loans and capitalized costs on foreclosed assets of $563,000, less pay-downs or upgrades of nonperforming loans to performing status totaling $4,226,000, less dispositions of foreclosed assets totaling $1,756,000, less loan charge-offs of $4,947,000, and less write-downs of foreclosed assets of $638,000.
The $14,025,000 in new nonperforming loans during the second quarter of 2011 was comprised of increases of $413,000 on three residential real estate loans, $10,644,000 on 11 commercial real estate loans, $1,655,000 on 13 home equity lines and

49


Table of Contents

loans, $133,000 on 32 indirect auto loans, $47,000 on 16 consumer loans, $909,000 on 10 C&I loans, and $205,000 on a single residential construction loan.
The $10,644,000 in new nonperforming commercial real estate loans was primarily made up of two loans in the amount of $664,000 secured by a commercial warehouse in northern California, two loans in the amount of $1,541,000 secured by commercial retail buildings in northern California, one loan in the amount of $1,859,000 secured by a commercial manufacturing facility in northern California, one loan in the amount of $3,145,000 secured by mixed use commercial property in northern California, a single loan in the amount of $2,665,000 secured by multi-family residential property in central California, and two loans in the amount of $716,000 secured by a commercial manufacturing facility in central California. Related charge-offs are discussed below.
The $909,000 in new nonperforming C&I loans was primarily made up of a single loan in the amount of $675,000 secured by accounts receivable, inventory and equipment in northern California. Related charge-offs are discussed below.
Loan charge-offs during the three months ended June 30, 2011
In the second quarter of 2011, the Company recorded $4,946,000 in loan charge-offs and $283,000 in deposit overdraft charge-offs less $407,000 in recoveries resulting in $4,823,000 of net charge-offs. Primary causes of the loan charges taken in the first quarter of 2011 were gross charge-offs of $321,000 on 11 residential real estate loans, $1,621,000 on five commercial real estate loans, $2,191,000 on 51 home equity lines and loans, $100,000 on 43 indirect auto loans, $21,000 on other consumer loans, $202,000 on six C&I loans, $395,000 on two residential construction loans and $95,000 on a single commercial construction loan.
The $1,621,000 in charge-offs the bank took in its commercial real estate portfolio was primarily the result of a $697,000 charge on a loan secured by a commercial office building in northern California and a $603,000 charge on a loan secured by a commercial retail building in northern California. The remaining $321,000 was spread over three loans spread throughout the Company’s footprint.
The $395,000 in charge-offs the bank took in its residential construction portfolio was the result of a $323,000 charge taken on a loan secured by single family residential development land in central California and a $71,000 charge taken on a loan secured by a single family residential lot in central California.
Differences between the amounts explained in this section and the total charge-offs listed for a particular category are generally made up of individual charges of less than $250,000 each. Generally losses are triggered by non-performance by the borrower and calculated based on any difference between the current loan amount and the current value of the underlying collateral less any estimated costs associated with the disposition of the collateral.
Activity in the balance of nonperforming assets for the periods indicated (continued):
                                                                 
    Balance at             Advances/     Pay-             Transfers to             Balance at  
    December 31,     New     Capitalized     downs     Charge-offs/     Foreclosed     Category     March 31,  
(dollars in thousands):     2010   NPA     Costs     /Sales     Write-downs     Assets     Changes     2011  
Real estate mortgage:
                                                               
Residential
  $ 11,771     $ 1,816     $ 62     $ (376 )   $ (1,125 )               $ 12,148  
Commercial
    38,925       443             (2,275 )     (368 )     (911 )     20       35,834  
Consumer
                                                               
Home equity lines
    10,604       2,654       581       (623 )     (3,601 )     (582 )           9,033  
Home equity loans
    701       23             (7 )                       717  
Auto indirect
    1,296       173       1       (277 )     (135 )                 1,058  
Other consumer
    83       237             (13 )     (229 )                 78  
Commercial
    4,618       1,802             (514 )     (1,556 )           (20 )     4,330  
Construction:
                                                               
Residential
    7,117             12       (124 )     (35 )     (30 )     (287 )     6,653  
Commercial
    872       479             (436 )                 287       1,202  
     
Total nonperforming loans
    75,987       7,627       656       (4,645 )     (7,049 )     (1,523 )           71,053  
Noncovered foreclosed assets
    5,000                   (1,983 )     (68 )     1,523             4,472  
Covered foreclosed assets
    4,913                   (21 )     (381 )                 4,511  
     
Total nonperforming assets
  $ 85,900     $ 7,627       656     $ (6,649 )   $ (7,498 )               $ 80,036  
     
Nonperforming assets decreased during the first quarter of 2011 by $5,864,000 (6.8%) to $80,036,000 at March 31, 2011 compared to $85,900,000 at December 31, 2010. The decrease in nonperforming assets during the first quarter of 2011 was

50


Table of Contents

primarily the result of new nonperforming loans of $7,627,000, advances on existing nonperforming loans and capitalized costs on foreclosed assets of $656,000, less pay-downs or upgrades of nonperforming loans to performing status totaling $4,645,000, less dispositions of foreclosed assets totaling $2,004,000, less loan charge-offs of $7,049,000, and less write-downs of foreclosed assets of $449,000.
The primary causes of the $7,432,000 in new nonperforming loans during the first quarter of 2011 were increases of $1,816,000 on seven residential real estate loans, $443,000 on five commercial real estate loans, $2,677,000 on 42 home equity lines and loans, $173,000 on 36 indirect auto loans, $42,000 on 18 consumer loans, $1,802,000 on 35 C&I loans, and $479,000 on a single commercial construction loan.
The $1,802,000 in new nonperforming C&I loans was primarily made up of a $499,000 loan secured by livestock in central California. Related charge-offs are discussed below.
The $479,000 in new nonperforming construction loans consisted entirely of a single unsecured loan to a real estate developer in northern California. Related charge-offs are discussed below.
Loan charge-offs during the three months ended March 31, 2011
In the first quarter of 2011, the Company recorded $7,049,000 in loan charge-offs less $701,000 in recoveries resulting in $6,348,000 of net loan charge-offs. Primary causes of the charges taken in the first quarter of 2011 were gross charge-offs of $1,125,000 on 19 residential real estate loans, $368,000 on six commercial real estate loans, $3,601,000 on 75 home equity lines and loans, $135,000 on 42 auto indirect loans, $229,000 on other consumer loans and overdrafts, $1,556,000 on 42 C&I loans, and $35,000 on two residential construction loans.
The $1,556,000 in charge-offs the bank took in its C&I portfolio was primarily the result of $300,000 on an asset-based line of credit secured by accounts receivable and inventory in northern California. The remaining $1,256,000 was spread over 41 loans spread throughout the Company’s footprint.
Differences between the amounts explained in this section and the total charge-offs listed for a particular category are generally made up of individual charges of less than $250,000 each. Generally losses are triggered by non-performance by the borrower and calculated based on any difference between the current loan amount and the current value of the underlying collateral less any estimated costs associated with the disposition of the collateral.
Allowance for Loan Losses
The Company’s allowance for loan losses is comprised of an allowance for originated loan losses and an allowance for PCI loan losses. Both the allowance for originated loan losses and the allowance for PCI loan losses are established through a provision for loan losses charged to expense.
Originated loans and deposit related overdrafts are charged against the allowance for originated loan losses when Management believes that the collectability of the principal is unlikely or, with respect to consumer installment loans, according to an established delinquency schedule. The allowance for originated loan losses is an amount that Management believes will be adequate to absorb probable losses inherent in existing originated loans and leases, based on evaluations of the collectability, impairment and prior loss experience of those loans and leases. The evaluations take into consideration such factors as changes in the nature and size of the portfolio, overall portfolio quality, loan concentrations, specific problem loans, and current economic conditions that may affect the borrower’s ability to pay. The Company defines an originated loan as impaired when it is probable the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Impaired originated loans are measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s original effective interest rate. As a practical expedient, impairment may be measured based on the loan’s observable market price or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. When the measure of the impaired loan is less than the recorded investment in the loan, the impairment is recorded through a valuation allowance.
In situations related to originated loans where, for economic or legal reasons related to a borrower’s financial difficulties, the Company grants a concession for other than an insignificant period of time to the borrower that the Company would not otherwise consider, the related loan is classified as a troubled debt restructuring (TDR). The Company strives to identify borrowers in financial difficulty early and work with them to modify to more affordable terms before their loan reaches nonaccrual status. These modified terms may include rate reductions, principal forgiveness, payment forbearance and other actions intended to minimize the economic loss and to avoid foreclosure or repossession of the collateral. In cases where the Company grants the borrower new terms that provide for a reduction of either interest or principal, the Company measures any impairment on the restructuring as noted above for impaired loans. TDR loans are classified as impaired until they are

51


Table of Contents

fully paid off or charged off. Loans that are in nonaccrual status at the time they become TDR loans, remain in nonaccrual status until the borrower demonstrates a sustained period of performance which the Company generally believes to be six consecutive months of payments, or equivalent. Otherwise, TDR loans are subject to the same nonaccrual and charge-off policies as noted above with respect to their restructured principal balance.
Credit risk is inherent in the business of lending. As a result, the Company maintains an allowance for loan losses to absorb losses inherent in the Company’s originated loan portfolio. This is maintained through periodic charges to earnings. These charges are included in the Consolidated Income Statements as provision for loan losses. All specifically identifiable and quantifiable losses are immediately charged off against the allowance. However, for a variety of reasons, not all losses are immediately known to the Company and, of those that are known, the full extent of the loss may not be quantifiable at that point in time. The balance of the Company’s allowance for originated loan losses is meant to be an estimate of these unknown but probable losses inherent in the portfolio.
The Company formally assesses the adequacy of the allowance for originated loan losses on a quarterly basis. Determination of the adequacy is based on ongoing assessments of the probable risk in the outstanding originated loan portfolio, and to a lesser extent the Company’s originated loan commitments. These assessments include the periodic re-grading of credits based on changes in their individual credit characteristics including delinquency, seasoning, recent financial performance of the borrower, economic factors, changes in the interest rate environment, growth of the portfolio as a whole or by segment, and other factors as warranted. Loans are initially graded when originated. They are re-graded as they are renewed, when there is a new loan to the same borrower, when identified facts demonstrate heightened risk of nonpayment, or if they become delinquent. Re-grading of larger problem loans occurs at least quarterly. Confirmation of the quality of the grading process is obtained by independent credit reviews conducted by consultants specifically hired for this purpose and by various bank regulatory agencies.
The Company’s method for assessing the appropriateness of the allowance for originated loan losses includes specific allowances for impaired originated loans and leases, formula allowance factors for pools of credits, and allowances for changing environmental factors (e.g., interest rates, growth, economic conditions, etc.). Allowance factors for loan pools are based on historical loss experience by product type. Allowances for impaired loans are based on analysis of individual credits. Allowances for changing environmental factors are Management’s best estimate of the probable impact these changes have had on the originated loan portfolio as a whole. The allowance for originated loans is included in the allowance for loan losses.
As noted above, the allowance for originated loan losses consists of a specific allowance, a formula allowance, and an allowance for environmental factors. The first component, the specific allowance, results from the analysis of identified credits that meet management’s criteria for specific evaluation. These loans are reviewed individually to determine if such loans are considered impaired. Impaired loans are those where management has concluded that it is probable that the borrower will be unable to pay all amounts due under the contractual terms. Impaired loans are specifically reviewed and evaluated individually by management for loss potential by evaluating sources of repayment, including collateral as applicable, and a specified allowance for loan losses is established where necessary.
The second component of the allowance for originated loan losses, the formula allowance, is an estimate of the probable losses that have occurred across the major loan categories in the Company’s originated loan portfolio. This analysis is based on loan grades by pool and the loss history of these pools. This analysis covers the Company’s entire originated loan portfolio including unused commitments but excludes any loans, that were analyzed individually and assigned a specific allowance as discussed above. The total amount allocated for this component is determined by applying loss estimation factors to outstanding loans and loan commitments. The loss factors are based primarily on the Company’s historical loss experience tracked over a five-year period and adjusted as appropriate for the input of current trends and events. Because historical loss experience varies for the different categories of originated loans, the loss factors applied to each category also differ. In addition, there is a greater chance that the Company has suffered a loss from a loan that was graded less than satisfactory than if the loan was last graded satisfactory. Therefore, for any given category, a larger loss estimation factor is applied to less than satisfactory loans than to those that the Company last graded as satisfactory. The resulting formula allowance is the sum of the allocations determined in this manner.
The third component of the allowance for originated loan losses, the environmental factor allowance, is a component that is not allocated to specific loans or groups of loans, but rather is intended to absorb losses that may not be provided for by the other components.

52


Table of Contents

There are several primary reasons that the other components discussed above might not be sufficient to absorb the losses present in the originated loan portfolio, and the environmental factor allowance is used to provide for the losses that have occurred because of them.
The first reason is that there are limitations to any credit risk grading process. The volume of originated loans makes it impractical to re-grade every loan every quarter. Therefore, it is possible that some currently performing originated loans not recently graded will not be as strong as their last grading and an insufficient portion of the allowance will have been allocated to them. Grading and loan review often must be done without knowing whether all relevant facts are at hand. Troubled borrowers may deliberately or inadvertently omit important information from reports or conversations with lending officers regarding their financial condition and the diminished strength of repayment sources.
The second reason is that the loss estimation factors are based primarily on historical loss totals. As such, the factors may not give sufficient weight to such considerations as the current general economic and business conditions that affect the Company’s borrowers and specific industry conditions that affect borrowers in that industry. The factors might also not give sufficient weight to other environmental factors such as changing economic conditions and interest rates, portfolio growth, entrance into new markets or products, and other characteristics as may be determined by Management.
Specifically, in assessing how much environmental factor allowance needed to be provided at June 30, 2011, management considered the following:
  with respect to the economy, management considered the effects of changes in GDP, unemployment, CPI, debt statistics, housing starts, housing sales, auto sales, agricultural prices, and other economic factors which serve as indicators of economic health and trends and which may have an impact on the performance of our borrowers, and
 
  with respect to changes in the interest rate environment, management considered the recent changes in interest rates and the resultant economic impact it may have had on borrowers with high leverage and/or low profitability; and
 
  with respect to changes in energy prices, management considered the effect that increases, decreases or volatility may have on the performance of our borrowers, and
 
  with respect to loans to borrowers in new markets and growth in general, management considered the relatively short seasoning of such loans and the lack of experience with such borrowers.
Each of these considerations was assigned a factor and applied to a portion or the entire originated loan portfolio. Since these factors are not derived from experience and are applied to large non-homogeneous groups of loans, they are available for use across the portfolio as a whole.
Although the weakening economy and resultant recession called for an increase in the factor related to economic conditions, the reductions in interest rates and energy prices coupled with very little loan growth resulted in a decrease in these factors causing the overall Environmental Factors Allowance to decrease. Also, in prior years, the Bank maintained a separate factor for Real Estate Risk due to the fact that the Bank had little or no losses in this loan category but anticipated that such losses would be experienced at some time. During the course of 2008 the Bank eliminated this environmental factor and instead provided for this risk in the Formula Allowance based on actual and expected loss ratios. This not only resulted in a reduction of the Environmental Factors Allowance but also resulted in an increase in the Formula Allowance. The Formula Allowance was further increased due to increases in losses over the course of 2008 which in turn resulted in increases in the reserve factors for certain loan types accordingly. These increased factors primarily affected construction loans, HELOCs, and indirect auto loans.
Acquired loans are valued as of acquisition date in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification (“FASB ASC”) Topic 805, Business Combinations. Loans purchased with evidence of credit deterioration since origination for which it is probable that all contractually required payments will not be collected are referred to as purchased credit impaired (PCI) loans. PCI loans are accounted for under FASB ASC Topic 310-30, Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality. In addition, because of the significant credit discounts associated with the loans acquired in the Granite acquisition, the Company elected to account for all loans acquired in the Granite acquisition under FASB ASC Topic 310-30, and classify them all as PCI loans. Under FASB ASC Topic 805 and FASB ASC Topic 310-30, PCI loans are recorded at fair value at acquisition date, factoring in credit losses expected to be incurred over the life of the loan. Accordingly, an allowance for loan losses is not carried over or recorded as of the acquisition date. Fair value is defined as the present value of the future estimated principal and interest payments of the loan, with the discount rate used in the present value calculation representing the estimated effective yield of the loan. The difference between contractual future payments and estimated future payments is referred to as the nonaccretable difference. The difference between estimated future payments and the present value of the estimated future payments is referred to as the

53


Table of Contents

accretable yield. The accretable yield represents the amount that is expected to be recorded as interest income over the remaining life of the loan. If after acquisition, the Company determines that the future cash flows of a PCI loan are expected to be more than the originally estimated, an increase in the discount rate (effective yield) would be made such that the newly increased accretable yield would be recognized, on a level yield basis, over the remaining estimated life of the loan. If after acquisition, the Company determines that the future cash flows of a PCI loan are expected to be less than the previously estimated, the discount rate would first be reduced until the present value of the reduced cash flow estimate equals the previous present value however, the discount rate may not be lowered below its original level. If the discount rate has been lowered to its original level and the present value has not been sufficiently lowered, an allowance for loan loss would be established through a provision for loan losses charged to expense to decrease the present value to the required level. If the estimated cash flows improve after an allowance has been established for a loan, the allowance may be partially or fully reversed depending on the improvement in the estimated cash flows. Only after the allowance has been fully reversed may the discount rate be increased. PCI loans are put on nonaccrual status when cash flows cannot be reasonably estimated. PCI loans are charged off when evidence suggests cash flows are not recoverable. Foreclosed assets from PCI loans are recorded in foreclosed assets at fair value with the fair value at time of foreclosure representing cash flow from the loan. ASC 310-30 allows PCI loans with similar risk characteristics and acquisition time frame to be “pooled” and have their cash flows aggregated as if they were one loan.
The Components of the Allowance for Loan Losses
The following table sets forth the Bank’s allowance for loan losses as of the dates indicated (dollars in thousands):
                 
    June 30,     December 31,  
    2011     2010  
     
Allowance for originated loan losses:
               
Specific allowance
  $ 5,809     $ 6,945  
Formula allowance
    32,352       31,070  
Environmental factors allowance
    3,431       2,948  
     
Allowance for originated loan losses
    41,592       40,963  
Allowance for PCI loan losses
    2,370       1,608  
     
Allowance for loan losses
  $ 43,962     $ 42,571  
     
Allowance for loan losses to loans
    3.15 %     3.00 %
Based on the current conditions of the loan portfolio, management believes that the $43,962,000 allowance for loan losses at June 30, 2011 is adequate to absorb probable losses inherent in the Bank’s loan portfolio. No assurance can be given, however, that adverse economic conditions or other circumstances will not result in increased losses in the portfolio.
The following table summarizes the allocation of the allowance for loan losses between loan types as of the dates indicated:
                 
    June 30,     December 31,  
(dollars in thousands)   2011     2010  
     
Real estate mortgage
  $ 15,940     $ 15,707  
Consumer
    18,857       17,779  
Commercial
    6,812       5,991  
Real estate construction
    2,353       3,094  
     
Total allowance for loan losses
  $ 43,962     $ 42,571  
     
The following table summarizes the allocation of the allowance for loan losses between loan types as a percentage of the total allowance for loan losses as of the dates indicated:
                 
    June 30,     December 31,  
(dollars in thousands)   2011     2010  
     
Real estate mortgage
    36.3 %     36.9 %
Consumer
    42.9 %     41.8 %
Commercial
    15.5 %     14.1 %
Real estate construction
    5.3 %     7.2 %
     
Total allowance for loan losses
    100.0 %     100.0 %
     

54


Table of Contents

The following tables summarize the activity in the allowance for loan losses, reserve for unfunded commitments, and allowance for losses (which is comprised of the allowance for loan losses and the reserve for unfunded commitments) for the periods indicated (dollars in thousands):
                                 
    Three months     Six months  
    ended June 30,     ended June 30,  
    2011     2010     2011     2010  
Allowance for loan losses:
                               
Balance at beginning of period
  $ 43,224     $ 36,340     $ 42,571     $ 35,473  
Provision for loan losses
    5,561       10,000       12,562       18,500  
Loans charged off:
                               
Real estate mortgage:
                               
Residential
    (321 )     (293 )     (1,446 )     (748 )
Commercial
    (1,621 )     (1,497 )     (1,989 )     (4,064 )
Consumer:
                               
Home equity lines
    (1,928 )     (3,095 )     (5,529 )     (5,337 )
Home equity loans
    (264 )     (303 )     (264 )     (711 )
Auto indirect
    (100 )     (337 )     (235 )     (863 )
Other consumer
    (304 )     (543 )     (533 )     (883 )
Commercial
    (202 )     (535 )     (1,758 )     (1,061 )
Construction:
                               
Residential
    (395 )     (1,782 )     (430 )     (2,819 )
Commercial
    (95 )     (39 )     (95 )     (39 )
         
Total loans charged off
    (5,230 )     (8,424 )     (12,279 )     (16,525 )
Recoveries of previously charged-off loans:
                               
Real estate mortgage:
                               
Residential
                112        
Commercial
    38       28       66       55  
Consumer:
                               
Home equity lines
    86       24       247       68  
Home equity loans
          7       2       7  
Auto indirect
    56       167       183       327  
Other consumer
    165       182       374       384  
Commercial
    41       103       62       117  
Construction:
                               
Residential
    20       3       22       24  
Commercial
    1             40        
         
Total recoveries of previously charged off loans
    407       514       1,108       982  
         
Net charge-offs
    (4,823 )     (7,910 )     (11,171 )     (15,543 )
         
Balance at end of period
  $ 43,962     $ 38,430     $ 43,962     $ 38,430  
         
 
                               
Reserve for unfunded commitments:
                               
Balance at beginning of period
  $ 2,690     $ 3,640     $ 2,640     $ 3,640  
Provision for losses — unfunded commitments
    (50 )     (800 )           (800 )
         
Balance at end of period
  $ 2,640     $ 2,840     $ 2,640     $ 2,840  
         

55


Table of Contents

                                 
    Three months     Six months  
    ended June 30,     ended June 30,  
    2011     2010     2011     2010  
Balance at end of period:
                               
Allowance for loan losses
  $ 43,962     $ 38,430     $ 43,962     $ 38,430  
Reserve for unfunded commitments
    2,640       2,840       2,640       2,840  
         
Allowance for loan losses and Reserve for unfunded commitments
  $ 46,602     $ 41,270     $ 46,602     $ 41,270  
         
 
                               
As a percentage of total loans at end of period:
                               
Allowance for loan losses
    3.15 %     2.55 %     3.15 %     2.55 %
Reserve for unfunded commitments
    0.19 %     0.19 %     0.19 %     0.19 %
         
Allowance for loan losses and Reserve for unfunded commitments
    3.34 %     2.74 %     3.34 %     2.74 %
         
 
                               
Average total loans
  $ 1,393,989     $ 1,463,475     $ 1,395,160     $ 1,466,580  
 
                               
Ratios (annualized):
                               
Net charge-offs during period to average loans outstanding during period
    1.38 %     2.16 %     1.60 %     2.12 %
Provision for loan losses to average loans outstanding
    1.60 %     2.73 %     1.80 %     2.52 %
Foreclosed Assets, Net of Allowance for Losses
The following tables detail the components and summarize the activity in foreclosed assets, net of allowances for losses for the periods indicated (dollars in thousands):
                                                                 
    Balance at             Advances/                                     Balance at  
    March 31,     New     Capitalized             Valuation     Transfers     Category     June 30,  
(dollars in thousands):   2011     NPA     Costs     Sales     Adjustments     from Loans     Changes     2011  
Noncovered:
                                                               
Land & Construction
  $ 1,978                       $ (403 )   $ 169           $ 1,744  
Residential real estate
    1,366                   (700 )     (22 )     2,219             2,863  
Commercial real estate
    1,128                   (231 )           360             1,257  
     
Total noncovered
    4,472                   (931 )     (425 )     2,748             5,864  
     
Covered:
                                                               
Land & Construction
    2,957                   (605 )     (144 )                 2,208  
Residential real estate
    186                         (6 )                 180  
Commercial real estate
    1,368                   (220 )     (63 )                 1,085  
     
Total covered
    4,511                   (825 )     (213 )                 3,473  
     
Total foreclosed assets
  $ 8,983                 $ (1,756 )   $ (638 )   $ 2,748           $ 9,337  
     
                                                                 
    Balance at             Advances/                                     Balance at  
    December 31,     New     Capitalized             Valuation     Transfers     Category     March 31,  
(dollars in thousands):   2010     NPA     Costs     Sales     Adjustments     from Loans     Changes     2011  
Noncovered:
                                                               
Land & Construction
  $ 2,211                 $ (263 )         $ 30           $ 1,978  
Residential real estate
    2,449                   (1,613 )     (51 )     581             1,366  
Commercial real estate
    340                   (107 )     (17 )     912             1,128  
     
Total noncovered
    5,000                   (1,983 )     (68 )     1,523             4,472  
     
Covered:
                                                               
Land & Construction
    3,016                         (59 )                 2,957  
Residential real estate
    186                                           186  
Commercial real estate
    1,711                   (21 )     (322 )                 1,368  
     
Total covered
    4,913                   (21 )     (381 )                 4,511  
     
Total foreclosed assets
  $ 9,913                 $ (2,004 )   $ (449 )   $ 1,523           $ 8,983  
     

56


Table of Contents

Intangible Assets
Intangible assets were comprised of the following as of the dates indicated:
                 
    June 30,     December 31,  
(dollars in thousands)   2011     2010  
Core-deposit intangible
  $ 475     $ 580  
Goodwill
    15,519       15,519  
     
Total intangible assets
  $ 15,994     $ 16,099  
     
The core-deposit intangible assets resulted from the Bank’s 2010 acquisition of Granite and the 2003 acquisition of North State National Bank. The goodwill intangible asset resulted from the North State National Bank acquisition. Amortization of core deposit intangible assets amounting to $20,000 and $65,000 was recorded in noninterest expense during the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Amortization of core deposit intangible assets amounting to $105,000 and $130,000 was recorded in noninterest expense during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Deposits
Deposits at June 30, 2011 decreased $15,442,000 (0.8%) over 2010 year-end balances to $1,836,731,000. Included in the June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 certificate of deposit balances is $5,000,000 from the State of California. The Bank participates in a deposit program offered by the State of California whereby the State may make deposits at the Bank’s request subject to collateral and creditworthiness constraints. The negotiated rates on these State deposits are generally favorable to other wholesale funding sources available to the Bank. Information on average deposit balances and average rates paid is included under the Net Interest Income section of this report. See Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements at Item 1 of this report for information about the Company’s deposits.
Long-Term Debt
See Note 16 to the consolidated financial statements at Item 1 of this report for information about the Company’s other borrowings, including long-term debt.
Junior Subordinated Debt
See Note 17 to the consolidated financial statements at Item 1 of this report for information about the Company’s junior subordinated debt.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
See Note 18 to the consolidated financial statements at Item 1 of this report for information about the Company’s commitments and contingencies            including off-balance-sheet arrangements.
Capital Resources
The current and projected capital position of the Company and the impact of capital plans and long-term strategies are reviewed regularly by Management.
The Company adopted and announced a stock repurchase plan on August 21, 2007 for the repurchase of up to 500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock from time to time as market conditions allow. The 500,000 shares authorized for repurchase under this plan represented approximately 3.2% of the Company’s approximately 15,815,000 common shares outstanding as of August 21, 2007. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company did not repurchase any shares under this plan. This plan has no stated expiration date for the repurchases. As of June 30, 2011, the Company had repurchased 166,600 shares under this plan, which left 333,400 shares available for repurchase under the plan. Shares that are repurchased in accordance with the provisions of a Company stock option plan or equity compensation plan are not counted against the number of shares repurchased under the repurchase plan adopted on August 21, 2007.
The Company’s primary capital resource is shareholders’ equity, which was $204,915,000 at June 30, 2011. This amount represents an increase of $4,518,000 from December 31, 2010, the net result of comprehensive income for the period of $6,905,000, the effect of stock option vesting of $500,000, the effect of stock options exercised of $2,428,000 and the related tax benefit of $296,000 that were partially offset by dividends paid of $2,866,000 and the repurchase of shares tendered to exercise options and pay related taxes of $2,745,000. The Company’s ratio of equity to total assets was 9.43% and 9.15% as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.

57


Table of Contents

The following summarizes the Company’s ratios of capital to risk-adjusted assets as of the dates indicated:
                         
    As of     As     Minimum  
    June 30,     December 31,     Regulatory  
    2011     2010     Requirement  
     
Tier I Capital
    13.28 %     12.93 %     4.00 %
Total Capital
    14.55 %     14.20 %     8.00 %
Leverage ratio
    10.38 %     10.03 %     4.00 %
See Note 19 to the consolidated financial statements at Item 1 of this report for information about the Company’s capital resources.
Liquidity
The Bank’s principal source of asset liquidity is cash at Federal Reserve and other banks and marketable investment securities available for sale. At June 30, 2011, cash at Federal Reserve and other banks and investment securities available for sale totaled $603,172,000, representing an increase of $12,089,000 (2.0%) from December 31, 2010. In addition, the Company generates additional liquidity from its operating activities. The Company’s profitability during the first six months of 2011 generated cash flows from operations of $17,348,000 compared to $22,477,000 during the first six months of 2010. Additional cash flows may be provided by financing activities, primarily the acceptance of deposits and borrowings from banks. Maturities of investment securities produced cash inflows of $39,352,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $42,816,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2010. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company invested $25,456,000 in securities and received $8,084,000 of net loan principal reductions, compared to $101,255,000 invested in securities and $40,097,000 of net loan principal reductions, respectively, during the first six months of 2010. These changes in investment and loan balances contributed to net cash provided by investing activities of $23,755,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2011, compared to net cash provided by investing activities of $1,677,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2010. Financing activities used net cash of $21,115,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2011, compared to net cash used by financing activities of $48,099,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2010. Deposit balance decreases accounted for $15,442,000 of financing uses of funds during the six months ended June 30, 2011, compared to $33,564,000 of financing uses of funds during the six months ended June 30, 2010. A net decrease in short-term other borrowings accounted for $2,786,000 of financing uses of funds during the six months ended June 30, 2011, compared to $11,301,000 of funds used to decrease short-term other borrowings during the six months ended June 30, 2010. Dividends paid used $2,866,000 and $3,489,000 of cash during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Also, the Company’s liquidity is dependent on dividends received from the Bank. Dividends from the Bank are subject to certain regulatory restrictions.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Our assessment of market risk as of June 30, 2011 indicates there are no material changes in the quantitative and qualitative disclosures from those in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
The Company’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, have evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2011. Disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), are controls and procedures designed to reasonably assure that information required to be disclosed in the Company’s reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported on a timely basis. Disclosure controls are also designed to reasonably assure that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based upon their evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2011.
There have been no changes in our internal controls or in other factors that have materially affected or are likely to materially affect our internal controls over financial reporting subsequent to the date of the evaluation.

58


Table of Contents

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1 — Legal Proceedings
Due to the nature of our business, we are involved in legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of our business. While the outcome of these matters is currently not determinable, we do not expect that the ultimate costs to resolve these matters will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
See Note 18, Commitments and Contingencies, for a discussion of the Company’s involvement in litigation pertaining to Visa, Inc.
Item 1A — Risk Factors
In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed under “Part I—Item 1A—Risk Factors” in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, as supplemented and updated by the discussion below. These factors could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, liquidity, results of operations and capital position, and could cause our actual results to differ materially from our historical results or the results contemplated by the forward-looking statements contained in this report.
Risks related to Tri Counties Bank’s assumption of the banking operations of Granite Community Bank from the FDIC under Whole Bank Purchase and Assumption Agreement with Loss-Share.
Our decisions regarding the fair value of assets acquired, including the FDIC loss sharing assets, could be inaccurate which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and future prospects. Management makes various assumptions and judgments about the collectability of the acquired loans, including the creditworthiness of borrowers and the value of the real estate and other assets serving as collateral for the repayment of secured loans. In FDIC-assisted acquisitions that include loss sharing agreements, we may record a loss sharing asset that we consider adequate to absorb future losses which may occur in the acquired loan portfolio. In determining the size of the loss sharing asset, we analyze the loan portfolio based on historical loss experience, volume and classification of loans, volume and trends in delinquencies and nonaccruals, local economic conditions, and other pertinent information.
If our assumptions are incorrect, the balance of the FDIC indemnification asset may at any time be insufficient to cover future loan losses, and credit loss provisions may be needed to respond to different economic conditions or adverse developments in the acquired loan portfolio. Any increase in future loan losses could have a negative effect on our operating results.
Our ability to obtain reimbursement under the loss sharing agreements on covered assets depends on our compliance with the terms of the loss sharing agreements. Management must certify to the FDIC on a quarterly basis our compliance with the terms of the FDIC loss sharing agreements as a prerequisite to obtaining reimbursement from the FDIC for realized losses on covered assets. The required terms of the agreements are extensive and failure to comply with any of the guidelines could result in a specific asset or group of assets permanently losing their loss sharing coverage. Additionally, Management may decide to forgo loss share coverage on certain assets to allow greater flexibility over the management of certain assets. As of June 30, 2011, $53,316,000, or 2.5%, of the Company’s assets were covered by the aforementioned FDIC loss sharing agreements.
Under the terms of the FDIC loss sharing agreements, the assignment or transfer of a loss sharing agreement to another entity generally requires the written consent of the FDIC. In addition, the Bank may not assign or otherwise transfer a loss sharing agreement during its term without the prior written consent of the FDIC. No assurances can be given that we will manage the covered assets in such a way as to always maintain loss share coverage on all such assets.

59


Table of Contents

Item 2 — Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
The following table shows information concerning the common stock repurchased by the Company during the first quarter of 2011 pursuant to the Company’s stock repurchase plan adopted on August 21, 2007, which is discussed in more detail under “Capital Resources” in this report and is incorporated herein by reference:
                                 
                    (c) Total number of        
                    shares purchased as     (d) Maximum number  
                    part of publicly     of shares that may yet  
    (a) Total number     (b) Average price     announced plans or     be purchased under the  
Period   of shares purchased     paid per share     programs     plans or programs  
 
Apr. 1-30, 2011
                      333,400  
May 1-31, 2011
                      333,400  
Jun. 1-31, 2011
                      333,400  
 
Total
                      333,400  
Item 6 — Exhibits
     
3.1
  Restated Articles of Incorporation, filed as Exhibit 3.1 to TriCo’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 16, 2009.
 
3.2
  Bylaws of TriCo Bancshares, as amended, filed as Exhibit 3.1 to TriCo’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 17, 2011.
 
4
  Certificate of Determination of Preferences of Series AA Junior Participating Preferred Stock filed as Exhibit 3.3 to TriCo’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2001.
 
10.1
  Rights Agreement dated June 25, 2001, between TriCo and Mellon Investor Services LLC filed as Exhibit 1 to TriCo’s Form 8-A dated July 25, 2001 and amended on July 8, 2011 as described in TriCo’s Form 8-A/A dated July 8, 2011.
 
10.2*
  Form of Change of Control Agreement dated as of August 23, 2005, between TriCo, Tri Counties Bank and each of Dan Bailey, Bruce Belton, Craig Carney, Gary Coelho, Rick Miller, Richard O’Sullivan, Thomas Reddish, and Ray Rios filed as Exhibit 10.2 to TriCo’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005.
 
10.5*
  TriCo’s 1995 Incentive Stock Option Plan filed as Exhibit 4.1 to TriCo’s Form S-8 Registration Statement dated August 23, 1995 (No. 33-62063).
 
10.6*
  TriCo’s 2001 Stock Option Plan, as amended, filed as Exhibit 10.7 to TriCo’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005.
 
10.7*
  TriCo’s 2009 Equity Incentive plan, included as Appendix A to TriCo’s definitive proxy statement filed on April 4, 2009.
 
10.8*
  Amended Employment Agreement between TriCo and Richard Smith dated as of August 23, 2005 filed as Exhibit 10.8 to TriCo’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005.
 
10.9*
  Tri Counties Bank Executive Deferred Compensation Plan restated April 1, 1992, and January 1, 2005 filed as Exhibit 10.9 to TriCo’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005.
 
10.10*
  Tri Counties Bank Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors effective January 1, 2005 filed as Exhibit 10.10 to TriCo’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005.
 
10.11*
  2005 Tri Counties Bank Deferred Compensation Plan for Executives and Directors effective January 1, 2005 filed as Exhibit 10.11 to TriCo’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005.
 
10.13*
  Tri Counties Bank Supplemental Retirement Plan for Directors dated September 1, 1987, as restated January 1, 2001, and amended and restated January 1, 2004 filed as Exhibit 10.12 to TriCo’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004.
 
10.14*
  2004 TriCo Bancshares Supplemental Retirement Plan for Directors effective January 1, 2004 filed as Exhibit 10.13 to TriCo’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004.
 
10.15*
  Tri Counties Bank Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan effective September 1, 1987, as amended and restated January 1, 2004 filed as Exhibit 10.14 to TriCo’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004.
 
10.16*
  2004 TriCo Bancshares Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan effective January 1, 2004 filed as Exhibit 10.15 to TriCo’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004.
 
10.17*
  Form of Joint Beneficiary Agreement effective March 31, 2003 between Tri Counties Bank and each of George Barstow, Dan Bay, Ron Bee, Craig Carney, Robert Elmore, Greg Gill, Richard Miller, Richard O’Sullivan, Thomas Reddish, Jerald Sax, and Richard Smith, filed as Exhibit 10.14 to TriCo’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003.

60


Table of Contents

     
10.18*
  Form of Joint Beneficiary Agreement effective March 31, 2003 between Tri Counties Bank and each of Don Amaral, William Casey, Craig Compton, John Hasbrook, Michael Koehnen, Donald Murphy, Carroll Taresh, and Alex Vereschagin, filed as Exhibit 10.15 to TriCo’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003.
 
10.19*
  Form of Tri-Counties Bank Executive Long Term Care Agreement effective June 10, 2003 between Tri Counties Bank and each of Craig Carney, Richard Miller, Richard O’Sullivan, and Thomas Reddish, filed as Exhibit 10.16 to TriCo’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003.
 
10.20*
  Form of Tri-Counties Bank Director Long Term Care Agreement effective June 10, 2003 between Tri Counties Bank and each of Don Amaral, William Casey, Craig Compton, John Hasbrook, Michael Koehnen, Donald Murphy, Carroll Taresh, and Alex Vereschagin, filed as Exhibit 10.17 to TriCo’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003.
 
10.21*
  Form of Indemnification Agreement between TriCo Bancshares/Tri Counties Bank and each of the directors of TriCo Bancshares/Tri Counties Bank effective on the date that each director is first elected, filed as Exhibit 10.18 to TriCo’S Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.
 
10.22*
  Form of Indemnification Agreement between TriCo Bancshares/Tri Counties Bank and each of Dan Bailey, Craig Carney, Rick Miller, Richard O’Sullivan, Thomas Reddish, Ray Rios, and Richard Smith filed as Exhibit 10.21 to TriCo’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004.
 
10.23
  Purchase and Assumption Agreement Whole Bank All Deposits, among the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, receiver of Granite Community Bank, N.A., Granite Bay, California, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and Tri Counties Bank, dated as of May 28, 2010, and related addendum filed as Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 3, 2010.
 
21.1
  Tri Counties Bank, a California banking corporation, TriCo Capital Trust I, a Delaware business trust, and TriCo Capital Trust II, a Delaware business trust, are the only subsidiaries of Registrant.
 
31.1
  Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of CEO
 
31.2
  Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of CFO
 
32.1
  Section 1350 Certification of CEO
 
32.2
  Section 1350 Certification of CFO
 
101.1
  The following materials from the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 are formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income, (iii) the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders' Equity, (iv) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (v) Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.(****)
 
*   Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement
****   Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the XBRL files on Exhibit 101.1 hereto are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, are deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise are not subject to liability under those sections.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
         
  TRICO BANCSHARES
(Registrant) 

 
Date: August 9, 2011  /s/ Thomas J. Reddish    
  Thomas J. Reddish   
  Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Duly authorized officer and principal financial officer)   

61