SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Filed by the Registrant ý
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o
Check the appropriate box:

o		Preliminary Proxy Statement
o		Confidential, for use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
ý		Definitive Proxy Statement
o		Definitive Additional Materials
o		Soliciting Material Under Rule 14a-12

KELLOGG COMPANY

(Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

ý		No fee required.
o		Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11

	(1)		Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
	(2)		Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
	(3)		Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
	(4)		Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
	(5)		Total fee paid:

o		Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
o		Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the form or schedule and the date of its filing.

	(1)		Amount Previously Paid:
	(2)		Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No:
	(3)		Filing party:
	(4)		Date Filed:

 

 

 

KELLOGG COMPANY, BATTLE CREEK, MICHIGAN 49017-3534

 

Dear Shareowner:

 

It is my pleasure to invite you to attend the 2008 Annual Meeting of Shareowners of Kellogg Company. The meeting will be held at 1:00 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time on April 25, 2008 at the W. K. Kellogg Auditorium, 50 West Van Buren Street, Battle Creek, Michigan.

 

The following pages contain the formal Notice of the Annual Meeting and the Proxy Statement. Please review this material for information concerning the business to be conducted at the meeting and the nominees for election as Directors. Attendance at the annual meeting will be limited to Shareowners only. If you are a holder of record of Kellogg common stock and you plan to attend the meeting, please detach the admission ticket attached to your proxy card and bring it to the meeting.

 

If you plan to attend the meeting, but your shares are not registered in your own name or you receive our proxy materials electronically, please request an admission ticket by writing to the following address: Kellogg Company Shareowner Services, One Kellogg Square, Battle Creek, MI 49017-3534. Evidence of your stock ownership, which you may obtain from your bank, stockbroker, etc., must accompany your letter. Shareowners without tickets will only be admitted to the meeting upon verification of stock ownership.

 

Shareowners needing special assistance at the meeting are requested to contact Shareowner Services at the address listed above.

 

Your vote is important. Whether you plan to attend the meeting or not, I urge you to vote your shares as soon as possible. Please either sign and return the accompanying card in the postage-paid envelope or instruct us by telephone or via the Internet as to how you would like your shares voted. This will ensure representation of your shares if you are unable to attend. Instructions on how to vote your shares by telephone or via the Internet are on the proxy card or voting instruction card.

 

Sincerely,

 

 

David Mackay
President and Chief Executive Officer

 

March 3, 2008

 

 

 

 

1.	Log on to the Internet at www.icsdelivery.com/kelloggs.
2.	Follow the instructions on the website.

 

 

	•	the date, time and location of the meeting;
	•	a list of the matters being submitted to the Shareowners; and
	•	information concerning voting in person at the meeting.

 

KELLOGG COMPANY

One Kellogg Square

Battle Creek, Michigan 49017-3534

 

NOTICE OF THE ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREOWNERS

 

TO BE HELD APRIL 25, 2008

 

TO OUR SHAREOWNERS:

 

The 2008 Annual Meeting of Shareowners of Kellogg Company, a Delaware corporation, will be held at 1:00 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time on April 25, 2008 at the W. K. Kellogg Auditorium, 50 West Van Buren Street, Battle Creek, Michigan, for the following purposes:

 

 

Only Shareowners of record at the close of business on March 4, 2008 will receive notice of and be entitled to vote at the meeting or any adjournments. We look forward to seeing you there.

 

By Order of the Board of Directors,

 

Gary Pilnick

Senior Vice President,

General Counsel, Corporate Development and Secretary

 

March 3, 2008

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

KELLOGG COMPANY

 

ONE KELLOGG SQUARE

BATTLE CREEK, MICHIGAN 49017-3534

PROXY STATEMENT

 

FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREOWNERS
TO BE HELD ON FRIDAY, APRIL 25, 2008

 

 

 

 

Solicitation of Proxy.  This proxy statement and the accompanying proxy are furnished to Shareowners of Kellogg Company in connection with the solicitation of proxies for use at the 2008 Annual Meeting of Shareowners of Kellogg to be held at 1:00 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time at the W. K. Kellogg Auditorium, 50 West Van Buren Street, in Battle Creek, Michigan, on Friday, April 25, 2008, or any adjournments thereof. The enclosed proxy card is solicited by our Board of Directors, which we refer to as the Board.

 

Mailing Date.  Our Annual Report for 2007, including financial statements, the Notice of the Annual Meeting, this proxy statement, and the proxy, were first mailed to Shareowners on or about March 11, 2008.

 

Who Can Vote — Record Date.  The record date for determining Shareowners entitled to vote at the annual meeting is March 4, 2008. Each of the approximately 383,469,359 shares of Kellogg common stock issued and outstanding on that date is entitled to one vote at the annual meeting.

 

How to Vote — Proxy Instructions.  If you are a holder of record of Kellogg Company common stock, you may vote your shares either (1) by attending the meeting and voting in person, (2) over the telephone by calling a toll-free number, (3) by using the Internet or (4) by mailing in your proxy card. Shareowners who hold their shares in “street name” will need to obtain a voting instruction card from the institution that holds their shares and must follow the voting instructions given by that institution.

 

The telephone and Internet voting procedures have been set up for your convenience and have been designed to authenticate your identity, to allow you to give voting instructions, and to confirm that those instructions have been recorded properly. If you would like to vote by telephone or by using the Internet, please refer to the specific instructions on the proxy card. The deadline for voting by telephone or via the Internet is 11:59 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time on Thursday, April 24, 2008. If you wish to vote using the proxy card, complete, sign, and date your proxy card and return it to us before the meeting.

 

Whether you choose to vote by telephone, over the Internet or by mail, you may specify whether your shares should be voted for all, some or none of the nominees for Director (Proposal 1); whether you approve, disapprove or abstain from voting on the proposal to ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2008 (Proposal 2); and whether you approve, disapprove or abstain from voting on the Shareowner proposal to enact a majority voting standard requirement, which may be presented at the meeting (Proposal 3).

 

When a properly executed proxy is received, the shares represented thereby, including shares held under our Dividend Reinvestment Plan, will be voted by the persons named as the proxy according to each Shareowner’s directions. Proxies will also be considered to be voting instructions to the applicable Trustee with respect to shares held in accounts under our Savings & Investment Plans.

 

If you do not specify how you want to vote your shares on your proxy card or voting instruction card, or voting by telephone or over the Internet, we will vote them “For” the election of all nominees for Director as set forth under “Proposal 1 — Election of Directors” below, “For” Proposal 2 and “Against” Proposal 3, and otherwise at the discretion of the persons named in the proxy card.

 

Revocation of Proxies.  If you are a holder of record, you may revoke your proxy at any time before it is exercised in any of three ways:

 

(1) by submitting written notice of revocation to our Secretary;

 

(3) by voting in person at the meeting.

 

If your shares are held in street name, you must contact your broker or nominee to revoke and vote your proxy.

 

Quorum.  A quorum of Shareowners is necessary to hold a valid meeting. A quorum will exist if the holders representing a majority of the votes entitled to be cast by the Shareowners at the annual meeting are present, in person or by proxy. Broker “non-votes” and abstentions are counted as present at the annual meeting for purposes of determining whether a quorum exists. A broker “non-vote” occurs when a nominee, such as a bank or broker, holding shares for a beneficial owner, does not vote on a particular proposal because the nominee does not have discretionary voting power for that particular item and has not received instructions from the beneficial owner. Under current New York Stock Exchange rules, nominees would have discretionary voting power for the election of Directors (Proposal 1) and for ratification of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (Proposal 2), but not for the Shareowner proposal (Proposal 3).

 

Required Vote.  Our Board has adopted a majority voting policy which applies to the election of Directors. Under this policy, any nominee for Director who receives a greater number of votes “withheld” from his or her election than votes “for” such election is required to offer his or her resignation following certification of the Shareowner vote. Our Board’s Nominating and Governance Committee would then consider the offer of resignation and make a recommendation to our independent Directors as to the action to be taken with respect to the offer. This policy does not apply in contested elections. For more information about this policy, see “Corporate Governance — Majority Voting for Directors; Director Resignation Policy.”

 

Under Delaware law, a nominee who receives a plurality of the votes cast at the annual meeting will be elected as a Director (subject to the resignation policy described above). The “plurality” standard means the nominees who receive the largest number of “for” votes cast are elected as Directors. Thus, the number of shares not voted for the election of a nominee (and the number of “withhold” votes cast with respect to that nominee) will not affect the determination of whether that nominee has received the necessary votes for election under Delaware law. However, the number of “withhold” votes with respect to a nominee will affect whether or not our Director resignation policy will apply to that individual. If any nominee is unable or declines to serve, proxies will be voted for the balance of those named and for such person as shall be designated by the Board to replace any such nominee. However, the Board does not anticipate that this will occur.

 

The affirmative vote of the holders representing a majority of the shares present and entitled to vote at the annual meeting is necessary to ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm (Proposal 2) and to approve the Shareowner proposal (Proposal 3). Shares present but not voted because of abstention will have the effect of a “no” vote on Proposals 2 and 3. If you do not provide your broker or other nominee with instructions on how to vote your “street name” shares, your broker or nominee will not be permitted to vote them on non-routine matters (a broker “non-vote”) such as Proposal 3. Shares subject to a broker “non-vote” will not be considered as present with respect to Proposal 3 and will not affect the outcome on that proposal.

 

Other Business.  We do not intend to bring any business before the meeting other than that set forth in the Notice of the Annual Meeting and described in this proxy statement. However, if any other business should properly come before the meeting, the persons named in the proxy card intend to vote in accordance with their best judgment on such business and on any matters dealing with the conduct of the meeting pursuant to the discretionary authority granted in the proxy.

 

Costs.  We pay for the preparation and mailing of the Notice of the Annual Meeting and proxy statement. We have also made arrangements with brokerage firms and other custodians, nominees, and fiduciaries for forwarding proxy-soliciting materials to the beneficial owners of the Kellogg common stock at our expense. In addition, we have retained Georgeson Inc. to aid in the solicitation of proxies by mail, telephone, facsimile, e-mail and personal solicitation. For these services, we will pay Georgeson a fee of $12,500, plus reasonable expenses.

 

Directions to Annual Meeting.  To obtain directions to attend the annual meeting and vote in person, please contact Investor Relations at (269) 961-2800 or at investor.relations@kellogg.com.

 

 

 

Five Percent Holders.  The following table shows each person who, based upon their most recent filings or correspondence with the SEC beneficially owns more than 5% of our common stock.

 

 

 

 

Officer and Director Stock Ownership.  The following table shows the number of shares of Kellogg common stock beneficially owned as of January 15, 2008, by each Director, each executive officer named in the Summary Compensation Table and all Directors and executive officers as a group.

 

 

 

 

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance.  Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires our Directors, executive officers, and greater-than-10% Shareowners to file reports with the SEC. SEC regulations require us to identify anyone who filed a required report late during the most recent fiscal year. Based on our review of these reports and written certifications provided to us, we believe that the filing requirements for all of these reporting persons were complied with, except that one Form 4 for each of Alan Andrews, Donna Banks, John Bryant, Celeste Clark, David Mackay, Jeff Montie, Gary Pilnick and Kathleen Wilson-Thompson was inadvertently filed late by Kellogg. A Form 4 was filed in March 2007 for each of these executive officers reporting this transaction.

 

 

 

Board-Adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines.  We operate under corporate governance principles and practices that are designed to maximize long-term Shareowner value, align the interests of the Board and management with those of our Shareowners and promote high ethical conduct among our Directors and employees. The Board has focused on continuing to build upon our strong corporate governance practices over the years. The Board’s current corporate governance guidelines include the following:

 

 

Majority Voting for Directors; Director Resignation Policy.  In an uncontested election of Directors (that is, an election where the number of nominees is equal to the number of seats open) any nominee for Director who receives a greater number of votes “withheld” from his or her election than votes “for” such election shall promptly tender his or her resignation to the Nominating and Governance Committee (following certification of the Shareowner vote) for consideration in accordance with the following procedures.

 

The Nominating and Governance Committee would promptly consider such resignation and recommend to the Qualified Independent Directors (as defined below) the action to be taken with respect to such offered resignation, which may include (1) accepting the resignation; (2) maintaining the Director but addressing what the Qualified Independent Directors believe to be the underlying cause of the withheld votes; (3) determining that the Director will not be renominated in the future for election; or (4) rejecting the resignation. The Nominating and Governance Committee would consider all relevant factors including, without limitation, (a) the stated reasons why votes were withheld from such Director; (b) any alternatives for curing the underlying cause of the withheld votes; (c) the tenure and qualifications of the Director; (d) the Director’s past and expected future contributions to Kellogg; (e) our Director criteria; (f) our Corporate Governance Guidelines; and (g) the overall composition of the Board, including whether accepting the resignation would cause Kellogg to fail to meet any applicable SEC or NYSE requirement.

 

The Qualified Independent Directors would act on the Nominating and Governance Committee’s recommendation no later than 90 days following the date of the Shareowners’ meeting where the election occurred. In considering the Nominating and Governance Committee’s recommendation, the Qualified Independent Directors would consider the

factors considered by the Nominating and Governance Committee and such additional information and factors the Board believes to be relevant. Following the Qualified Independent Directors’ decision, Kellogg would promptly disclose in a current report on Form 8-K the decision whether to accept the resignation as tendered (providing a full explanation of the process by which the decision was reached and, if applicable, the reasons for rejecting the tendered resignation).

 

To the extent that any resignation is accepted, the Nominating and Governance Committee would recommend to the Board whether to fill such vacancy or vacancies or to reduce the size of the Board.

 

Any Director who tenders his or her resignation pursuant to this provision would not participate in the Nominating and Governance Committee’s recommendation or Qualified Independent Directors’ consideration regarding whether to accept the tendered resignation. Prior to voting, the Qualified Independent Directors would afford the Director an opportunity to provide any information or statement that he or she deems relevant. If a majority of the members of the Nominating and Governance Committee received a greater number of votes “withheld” from their election than votes “for” their election at the same election, then the remaining Qualified Independent Directors who are on the Board who did not receive a greater number of votes “withheld” from their election than votes “for” their election (or who were not standing for election) would consider the matter directly or may appoint a Board committee amongst themselves solely for the purpose of considering the tendered resignations that would make the recommendation to the Board whether to accept or reject them.

 

For purposes of this policy, the term “Qualified Independent Directors” means:

 

 

Director Independence.  The Board has determined that all current Directors (other than Mr. Jenness and Mr. Mackay) are independent based on the following standards: (a) no entity (other than a charitable entity) of which a Director is an employee in any position or any immediate family member (as defined) is an executive officer, made payments to, or received payments from, Kellogg and its subsidiaries in any of the 2007, 2006, or 2005 fiscal years in excess of the greater of (1) $1,000,000 or (2) two percent of that entity’s annual consolidated gross revenues; (b) no Director, or any immediate family member employed as an executive officer of Kellogg or its subsidiaries, received in any twelve month period within the last three years more than $100,000 per year in direct compensation from Kellogg or its subsidiaries, other than Director and committee fees and pension or other forms of deferred compensation for prior service not contingent in any way on continued service; (c) Kellogg did not employ a Director in any position, or any immediate family member as an executive officer, during the past three years; (d) no Director was currently employed by the present or former independent or internal Kellogg auditor (“Auditor”), no immediate family member of a Director was a current partner of the Auditor, no Director or immediate family member was an employee of the Auditor who personally worked on our audit during the past three years and no immediate family member of a Director was a current employee of the Auditor and participated in the Auditor’s audit, assurance or tax compliance practice; (e) no Director or immediate family member served as an executive officer of another company during the past three years at the same time as a current executive officer of Kellogg served on the compensation committee of such company; and (f) no other material relationship exists between any Director and Kellogg or our subsidiaries. The Board also determined that Mr. Jorndt and Dr. Richardson met the above standards for Director independence in 2007 while they served as Directors.

 

In connection with its independence determinations for Mr. Speirn, the Board noted that Kellogg entered into two agreements with the W. K. Kellogg Foundation Trust (the “Kellogg Trust”), one dated as of November 8, 2005 (the “2005 Agreement”) and one dated as of February 16, 2006 (the “2006 Agreement,” and together with the 2005 Agreement, the “Agreements”) under which we repurchased a total of 22,156,318 shares of our common stock from the Kellogg Trust for an aggregate cash purchase price of $950,000,000 (collectively, the “Trust Transactions”). Mr. Speirn, a Kellogg Director elected on March 1, 2007, became a trustee of the Kellogg Trust in January 2007 and became the President and Chief Executive Officer of the W. K. Kellogg Foundation (the “Kellogg Foundation”), a charitable foundation that is the sole beneficiary of the Kellogg Trust, in January 2006. In connection with Mr. Speirn’s election to the Board, the Board

determined that Mr. Speirn was independent under the NYSE listing standards, and that the Agreements and the Trust Transactions were not material for these purposes. In reaching this conclusion, the Board took into account that:

 

 

The Board also considered commercial ordinary-course transactions with respect to several Directors as it assessed independence status, including transactions relating to purchasing supplies, selling product and marketing arrangements. The Board concluded that these transactions did not impair Director independence for a variety of reasons including that the amounts in question were considerably under the thresholds set forth in our independence standards and the relationships were not deemed material.

 

Shareowner Recommendations for Director Nominees.  The Nominating and Governance Committee will consider Shareowner nominations for membership on the Board. For the 2009 Annual Meeting of Shareowners, nominations may be submitted to the Office of the Secretary, Kellogg Company, One Kellogg Square, Battle Creek, Michigan 49017, which will forward them to the Chairman of the Nominating and Governance Committee. Recommendations must be in writing and we must receive the recommendation not earlier than the 120th day prior to the 2009 annual meeting and not later than January 25, 2009. Recommendations must also include certain other requirements specified in our bylaws.

 

The Nominating and Governance Committee believes that all nominees must, at a minimum, meet the criteria set forth in the Board’s Code of Conduct and the Corporate Governance Guidelines, which specify, among other things, that the Nominating and Governance Committee will consider criteria such as independence, diversity, age, skills and experience in the context of the needs of the Board. The Nominating and Governance Committee also will consider a combination of factors for each nominee, including (1) the nominee’s ability to represent all Shareowners without a conflict of interest; (2) the nominee’s ability to work in and promote a productive environment; (3) whether the nominee has sufficient time and willingness to fulfill the substantial duties and responsibilities of a Director; (4) whether the nominee has demonstrated the high level of character and integrity that we expect; (5) whether the nominee possesses the broad professional and leadership experience and skills necessary to effectively respond to the complex issues encountered by a multi-national, publicly-traded company; and (6) the nominee’s ability to apply sound and independent business judgment.

 

When filling a vacancy on the Board, the Nominating and Governance Committee identifies the desired skills and experience of a new Director in light of the criteria described above and the skills and experience of the then-current Directors. The Nominating and Governance Committee may, as it has done in the past, engage third parties to assist in the search and provide recommendations. Also, Directors are generally asked to recommend candidates for the position. The candidates would be evaluated based on the process outlined in the Corporate Governance Guidelines and the Nominating and Governance Committee charter, and the same process would be used for all candidates, including candidates recommended by Shareowners.

 

Communication with the Board.  Mr. Gund, the Chairman of the Nominating and Governance Committee and the Lead Director, usually presides at executive sessions of the independent members of the Board. Mr. Gund may be contacted at gordon.gund@kellogg.com. Any communications which Shareowners may wish to send to the Board may be directly sent to Mr. Gund at this e-mail address.

 

Attendance at Annual Meetings.  All Directors properly nominated for election are expected to attend the annual meeting of Shareowners. All of our Directors attended the 2007 annual meeting of Shareowners.

 

Code of Ethics.  We have adopted the Code of Conduct for Kellogg Company Directors and Global Code of Ethics for Kellogg Company employees (including the chief executive officer, chief financial officer and corporate controller).

Any amendments to or waivers of the Global Code of Ethics applicable to our chief executive officer, chief financial officer or corporate controller will be posted on www.kelloggcompany.com. There were no amendments to or waivers of the Global Code of Ethics in 2007.

 

Availability of Corporate Governance Documents.  Copies of the Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Charters of the Audit, Compensation, and Nominating and Governance Committees of the Board, the Code of Conduct for Kellogg Company Directors, and Global Code of Ethics for Kellogg Company employees can be found on the Kellogg Company website at www.kelloggcompany.com under “Corporate Governance.” Shareowners may also request a free copy of these documents from: Kellogg Company, P.O. Box CAMB, Battle Creek, Michigan 49016-1986 (phone: (800) 961-1413), Ellen Leithold of the Investor Relations Department at that same address (phone: (269) 961-2800) or investor.relations@kellogg.com.

 

 

 

 

In 2007, the Board had the following standing committees: Audit, Compensation, Nominating and Governance, Finance, Social Responsibility, Consumer Marketing and Executive.

 

The Board held nine meetings in 2007. All of the incumbent Directors attended at least 75% of the total number of meetings of the Board and of all Board committees of which the Directors were members during 2007.

 

The table below provides 2007 membership and meeting information for each Board committee as of December 29, 2007:

 

 

 

 

Audit Committee.  Pursuant to a written charter, the Audit Committee assists the Board in monitoring the integrity of our financial statements, the independence and performance of our independent registered public accounting firm, the performance of our internal audit function and our compliance with financial, legal and regulatory requirements. The Audit Committee, or its Chair, also pre-approves all audit, internal control-related and permitted non-audit engagements and services by the independent registered public accounting firm and their affiliates. It also discusses and/or reviews specified matters with, and receives specified information or assurances from, Kellogg management and the independent registered

public accounting firm. The Committee also has the sole authority to appoint or replace the independent registered public accounting firm, which directly report to the Audit Committee, and is directly responsible for the compensation and oversight of the independent registered public accounting firm. Each member of the Audit Committee has been determined by the Board to be an “audit committee financial expert,” as that term is defined in paragraph (h) of Item 401 of SEC Regulation S-K. Each member has experience actively supervising a principal financial officer and/or principal accounting officer. Each of the Committee members meets the independence requirements of the New York Stock Exchange.

 

Compensation Committee.  Pursuant to a written charter, the Compensation Committee (a) reviews and makes recommendations for the compensation of senior management personnel and monitors overall compensation for senior executives; (b) reviews and recommends the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer; (c) has sole authority to retain or terminate any compensation consultant used to evaluate senior executive compensation; (d) oversees and administers employee benefit plans to the extent provided in those plans; and (e) reviews trends in management compensation. The Committee may form and delegate authority to subcommittees or the Chair when appropriate. The Compensation Committee, or its Chair, also pre-approves all engagements and services to be performed by any consultants to the Compensation Committee. To assist the Compensation Committee in discharging its responsibilities, the Committee has retained an independent compensation consultant — Towers Perrin. The consultant reports directly to the Compensation Committee. Other than the work it performs for the Compensation Committee and the Board, Towers Perrin does not provide any consulting services to Kellogg or its executive officers. Each of the Committee members meets the independence requirements of the New York Stock Exchange. For additional information about the Compensation Committee’s processes for establishing and overseeing executive compensation, refer to “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Our Compensation Methodology.”

 

Nominating and Governance Committee.  Pursuant to a written charter, the Nominating and Governance Committee assists the Board by (a) identifying and reviewing the qualifications of candidates for Director and in determining the criteria for new Directors; (b) recommends nominees for Director to the Board; (c) recommends committee assignments; (d) reviews annually the Board’s compliance with the Corporate Governance Guidelines; (e) reviews annually the Corporate Governance Guidelines and recommends changes to the Board; (f) monitors the performance of Directors and conducts performance evaluations of each Director before the Director’s renomination to the Board; (g) administers the annual evaluation of the Board; (h) provides annually an evaluation of CEO performance used by the independent members of the Board in their annual review of CEO performance; (i) considers and evaluates potential waivers of the Codes of Conduct and Ethics for Directors and senior officers (for which there were none in 2007), and makes a report to the Board on succession planning at least annually; (j) provides an annual review of the independence of Directors to the Board; and (k) reviews Director compensation. The Chair of the Nominating and Governance Committee, as Lead Director, also presides at executive sessions of independent Directors of the Board. Each of the Nominating and Governance Committee members meets the independence requirements of the New York Stock Exchange. In 2007, we paid a third-party search firm to identify for the Nominating and Governance Committee possible Director nominees that meet our established criteria.

 

Finance Committee.  As of the date of this proxy statement, the Finance Committee is no longer a standing committee of the Board and its responsibilities have been reallocated to the other committees of the Board. Prior to its dissolution, the Finance Committee reviewed matters regarding our financial affairs, such as strategic and operating plans, the financial terms of acquisitions, divestitures, joint ventures and other transactions, short- and long-term financing, foreign exchange management, financial derivatives including commodities and hedging, capital expenditures, dividends and taxes, financial policies including cash flow, borrowing and dividend policy, sales or repurchases of equity and long-term debt, finance, treasury and related functions, insurance programs, pension investment performance and pension plan compliance. The Committee also received a report from management which covered any off-balance sheet transactions and confirmed that Kellogg has not made or arranged for any personal loan to any executive officer or Director.

 

Social Responsibility Committee.  Pursuant to a written charter, the Social Responsibility Committee reviews the manner in which we discharge our social responsibilities and recommends to the Board policies, programs and practices it deems appropriate to enable us to carry out and discharge our social responsibilities. This commitment means investing in and enriching communities in which we conduct business, as well as encouraging employee involvement in these activities.

 

Consumer Marketing Committee.  Pursuant to a written charter, the Consumer Marketing Committee reviews matters regarding our marketing activities, including strategies, programs, spending and execution quality in order to help ensure that our marketing is consistent with, and is sufficient to support, our overall strategy and performance goals.

 

Executive Committee.  Pursuant to a written charter, the Executive Committee is generally empowered to act on behalf of the Board between meetings of the Board, with some exceptions.

 

 

 

Our amended restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws provide that the Board shall be comprised of not less than seven and no more than fifteen Directors divided into three classes as nearly equal in number as possible, and that each Director shall be elected for a term of three years with the term of one class expiring each year.

 

Three Directors are to be re-elected at the 2008 Annual Meeting to serve for a term ending at the 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareowners, and the proxies cannot be voted for a greater number of persons than the number of nominees named. There are currently twelve members of the Board. Mr. Claudio Gonzalez is not standing for re-election at the annual meeting because he has reached the retirement age set forth in our Corporate Governance Guidelines.

 

The Board recommends that the Shareowners vote “FOR” the following nominees: David Mackay, Sterling Speirn and Dr. John Zabriskie. Each nominee was proposed for re-election by the Nominating and Governance Committee for consideration by the Board and proposal to the Shareowners.

 

DAVID MACKAY. Mr. Mackay, age 52, has served as a Kellogg Director since February 2005. On December 31, 2006, he assumed the role as our President and Chief Executive Officer after having served as our President and Chief Operating Officer since September 2003. Mr. Mackay joined Kellogg Australia in 1985 and held several positions with Kellogg USA, Kellogg Australia and Kellogg New Zealand before leaving Kellogg in 1992. He rejoined Kellogg Australia in 1998 as managing director and was appointed managing director of Kellogg United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland later in 1998. He was named Senior Vice President and President, Kellogg USA in July 2000, Executive Vice President in November 2000 and President and Chief Operating Officer in September 2003. He is also a director of Fortune Brands, Inc.

 

STERLING SPEIRN. Mr. Speirn, age 60, has served as a Kellogg Director since March 1, 2007. He is President and Chief Executive Officer of the W. K. Kellogg Foundation. He is also a trustee of the W. K. Kellogg Foundation Trust. Prior to joining the W. K. Kellogg Foundation in January 2006, he was President of Peninsula Community Foundation from November 1992 to the end of 2005 and served as a director of the Center for Venture Philanthropy, which he co-founded in 1999. The Nominating and Governance Committee and the Board were introduced to Mr. Speirn through his activities with the Kellogg Foundation. After reviewing his qualifications, skills, and experience against the established criteria for nominees, the Committee recommended and the Board subsequently appointed Mr. Speirn to the Kellogg Board.

 

JOHN ZABRISKIE. Dr. Zabriskie, age 68, has served as a Kellogg Director since 1995. He is also co-founder and Director of PureTech Ventures, LLC, a firm that co-founds life science companies. In 2001, he became Chairman of the Board of Directors of MacroChem Corporation. In 1999, he retired as Chief Executive Officer of NEN Life Science Products, Inc., a position he had held since 1997. From November 1995 to January 1997, Dr. Zabriskie served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Pharmacia & Upjohn, Inc. Dr. Zabriskie is a director of the following public companies: Array Biopharma, Inc. and MacroChem Corporation. He is also a director of the following privately-held companies: Protein Forest, Inc., Puretech Ventures, L.L.C., ARCA Discovery and Cellicon Biotechnologies.

 

BENJAMIN CARSON. Dr. Carson, age 56, has served as a Kellogg Director since 1997. He is Professor and Director of Pediatric Neurosurgery, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, a position he has held since 1984, as well as Professor of Oncology, Plastic Surgery, Pediatrics and Neurosurgery at The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions. Dr. Carson is also a director of Costco Wholesale Corporation.

 

GORDON GUND. Mr. Gund, age 68, has served as a Kellogg Director since 1986. He is Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Gund Investment Corporation, which manages diversified investment activities. He is also a director of Corning Incorporated.

 

DOROTHY JOHNSON. Ms. Johnson, age 67, has served as a Kellogg Director since 1998. Ms. Johnson is President of the Ahlburg Company, a philanthropic consulting agency, a position she has held since February 2000, and President Emeritus of the Council of Michigan Foundations, which she led as President and Chief Executive Officer from 1975 to 2000. She is also on the Board of Directors of AAA Michigan, Grand Valley State University and The League, and has been a member of the Board of Trustees of the W. K. Kellogg Foundation since 1980.

ANN MCLAUGHLIN KOROLOGOS. Ms. McLaughlin Korologos, age 66, has served as a Kellogg Director since 1989. She is currently Chairman, RAND Board of Trustees, Chairman Emeritus of The Aspen Institute, a nonprofit organization, and is a former U.S. Secretary of Labor. She is also a director of AMR Corporation (and its subsidiary, American Airlines), Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc., Harman International Industries, Inc. and Vulcan Materials Company.

 

JOHN DILLON. Mr. Dillon, age 69, has served as a Kellogg Director since 2000. He is Vice Chairman of Evercore Capital Partners and a Senior Managing Director of that firm’s investment activities and private equity business. He retired in October 2003 as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of International Paper Company, a position he held since 1996, and retired as Chairman of the Business Roundtable in June 2003. He is a director of the following public companies: Caterpillar Inc. and E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company.

 

JIM JENNESS. Mr. Jenness, age 61, has been Kellogg Chairman since February 2005 and has served as a Kellogg Director since 2000. He was our Chief Executive Officer from February 2005 through December 30, 2006, and Chief Executive Officer of Integrated Merchandising Systems, LLC, a leader in outsource management of retail promotion and branded merchandising, from 1997 to December 2004. Before joining Integrated Merchandising Systems, Mr. Jenness served as Vice Chairman and Chief Operating Officer of the Leo Burnett Company from 1996 to 1997 and, before that, as Global Vice Chairman North America and Latin America from 1993 to 1996. He has also been a trustee of the W. K. Kellogg Foundation Trust since 2005, and is a director of Kimberly-Clark Corporation.

 

DON KNAUSS. Mr. Knauss, age 57, has served as a Kellogg Director since December 6, 2007. Mr. Knauss was elected Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of The Clorox Company in October 2006. He was executive vice president of The Coca-Cola Company and president and chief operating officer for Coca-Cola North America from February 2004 until August 2006. Previously, he was president of the Retail Division of Coca-Cola North America from January 2003 through February 2004 and president and chief executive officer of The Minute Maid Company, a division of The Coca-Cola Company, from January 2000 until January 2003 and President of Coca-Cola South Africa from March 1998 until January 2000. Prior to that, he held various positions in marketing and sales with PepsiCo, Inc. and Procter & Gamble, and served as an officer in the United States Marine Corps.

 

ROBERT STEELE. Mr. Steele, age 52, has served as a Kellogg Director since July 1, 2007. He was appointed Vice Chairman — Global Health and Well-Being of Procter & Gamble in July 2007. He was Group President — Global Household Care from April 2006 to July 2007 and Group President — North America from July 2004 through April 2006. Prior to that, he was President, North America from July 2000 through July 2004.

 

CLAUDIO GONZALEZ. Mr. Gonzalez, age 73, a Kellogg Director since 1990, has reached the retirement age set forth in our Corporate Governance Guidelines and will not stand for re-election at the 2008 annual meeting. He was Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Kimberly-Clark de Mexico, S.A. de C.V., a producer of consumer disposable tissue products until April 1, 2007, and has continued as Chairman of the Board since such date. He is a director of the following public companies: General Electric Company, The Home Depot, Inc., The Investment Company of America, Grupo ALFA, Grupo Mexico, Grupo Carso, Grupo Televisa and The Mexico Fund.

 

 

 

Only non-management Directors receive compensation for their services as Directors. For information about the compensation of Mr. Mackay, our President and Chief Executive Officer, refer to “Executive Compensation” beginning on page 30. Because Mr. Jenness, our Chairman of the Board, is not a named executive officer, we have included the compensation he receives as a Kellogg employee in the Directors’ Compensation Table.

 

Our 2007 compensation package for non-management Directors was comprised of cash (annual retainers and committee meeting fees), stock awards and stock option grants. The annual pay package is designed to attract and retain highly-qualified, independent professionals to represent our Shareowners, and is targeted at the median of our peer group. Refer to “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Our Compensation Methodology” for a description of the companies that make up our peer group. The Nominating and Governance Committee reviews our Director compensation program on an annual basis with Towers Perrin, the independent compensation consultant, including the competitiveness and appropriateness of the program. Although the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee conducts this review on an annual basis, its general practice is to consider adjustments to Director compensation every other year.

 

Our compensation package is also designed to create alignment between our Directors and our Shareowners through the use of equity-based grants. In 2007, approximately 65% of non-management Director pay was in equity and approximately 35% in cash. Actual annual pay varies among non-management Directors based on Board committee memberships, committee chair responsibilities, meetings attended and whether a Director elects to defer his or her fees.

 

Our letter agreement with Mr. Jenness, our former Chief Executive Officer, outlines the compensation and benefits to which he is entitled while serving as executive Chairman of the Board. In 2007, it was the preference of Mr. Jenness to forfeit certain awards that had been previously granted to him and not receive any additional annual base salary, bonus or long-term compensation. Consequently, he did not receive any Director fees, base salary, bonus or long-term incentive grants in 2007. Given the ongoing time commitment of serving as executive Chairman, the valuable service he provides Kellogg and its Shareowners and his affection for Kellogg, the Board determined in February 2008 it was appropriate to provide compensation to Mr. Jenness beginning in 2008. The total amount of his annual compensation is $630,000, which is comprised of the same long-term incentives granted to non-management Directors (2,100 shares of restricted stock and 5,000 stock options), with the remaining compensation paid in cash. Mr. Jenness received these equity grants in 2008 on the same day the annual long-term incentives were granted to other employees of Kellogg. The stock options will vest in the same manner as those received by other employees (50% on February 22, 2009 (the first anniversary of the grant date), and 50% on February 22, 2010 (the second anniversary of the grant date)). The shares of restricted stock vested immediately, but Mr. Jenness must hold the shares as long as he is a Kellogg employee or Director. Working with Towers Perrin, the Board determined the total compensation amount for Mr. Jenness to be reasonable and competitive. Refer to “Employment Agreements — Mr. Jenness” for a description of the employment agreement with Mr. Jenness.

 

2007 compensation for non-management Directors consisted of the following:

 

 

 

 

Stock Option Awards.  Stock option grants (1) are made each year on January 31 or the next business day, (2) are exercisable six months after the date of grant and (3) have a ten-year term. Prior to October 2007, all options granted to non-management Directors were granted with exercise prices equal to the average of the high and low trading prices of our stock on the date of grant. Beginning in October 2007, the exercise price of all options granted to non-management Directors is set at the officially quoted closing price of our common stock on the date of grant.

 

Prior to 2004, we granted “original” options with an accelerated ownership feature (“AOF”). Under the terms of the original option grant, a new option, or “AOF option,” is generally received when Kellogg stock is used to pay the exercise price of a stock option and related taxes. The holder of the option receives an AOF option for the number of shares used. For AOF options, the expiration date is the same as the original option and, beginning in October 2007, the option exercise price is the officially quoted closing price of our common stock on the date the AOF option is granted.

 

The Compensation Committee began using the AOF options over fifteen years ago in order to create greater stock ownership by encouraging Directors and executives to exercise valuable stock options and retain the shares received as a result of the option exercise. The Compensation Committee discontinued the use of the AOF feature in all new “original” option grants after 2003 to better align with peer group compensation practices and in anticipation of new accounting rules for the expensing of stock options. Although we discontinued the AOF feature in new option grants, a number of the outstanding options disclosed in the Directors’ Compensation Table were granted prior to 2004. Consequently, those AOF options could continue until their natural expiration date (generally, ten years after the date of the original grant). The Compensation Committee further changed the AOF options in 2007 so that they may only be exercised once each fiscal year. Prior to this change, AOF options were generally exercised twice during each fiscal year. Our overall stock option expense is reduced by limiting the number of times an AOF option can be exercised during any given fiscal year.

 

Stock Awards.  Stock awards are granted each May 1 or the next business day and are automatically deferred pursuant to the Kellogg Company Grantor Trust for Non-Employee Directors. Under the terms of the Grantor Trust, shares are available to a Director only upon termination of service on the Board.

 

Business Expenses.  The Directors are reimbursed for their business expenses related to their attendance at Kellogg meetings, including room, meals and transportation to and from board and committee meetings. On rare occasions, a Director’s spouse accompanies a Director when traveling on Kellogg business. At times, a Director travels to and from Kellogg meetings on Kellogg corporate aircraft. Directors are also eligible to be reimbursed for attendance at qualified Director education programs.

 

Director and Officer Liability Insurance and Travel Accident Insurance.  Director and officer liability insurance insures our Directors and officers against certain losses that they are legally required to pay as a result of their actions while performing duties on our behalf. Our D&O insurance policy does not break out the premium for Directors versus officers and, therefore, a dollar amount cannot be assigned for individual Directors. Travel accident insurance provides benefits to each Director in the event of death or disability (permanent and total) during travel on Kellogg corporate aircraft. Our travel accident insurance policy also covers employees and others while traveling on Kellogg corporate aircraft and, therefore, a dollar amount cannot be assigned for individual Directors.

 

Elective Deferral Program.  Under the Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors, non-employee Directors may each year irrevocably elect to defer all or a portion of their board annual cash retainer, committee Chair annual retainers and committee meeting fees payable for the following year. The amount deferred is credited to an account in the form of units equivalent to the fair market value of our common stock. If the Board declares dividends, a fractional unit representing the dividend is credited to the account of each participating Director. A participant’s account balance is paid in cash or stock, at the election of the Director, upon termination of service as a Director. The balance is paid in a lump sum or over a period from one to ten years at the election of the Director and the unpaid account balance accrues interest annually at the prime rate in effect when the termination of service occurred.

 

Minimum Stock Ownership Requirement.  All non-management Directors are expected to comply with stock ownership guidelines, under which they are expected to hold at least five times the annual cash retainer ($350,000 — five times the $70,000 retainer) in stock or stock equivalents, subject to a five-year phase-in period for newly-elected Directors. As of December 29, 2007, all of the non-management Directors met or were on track to meet this requirement. Mr. Mackay and Mr. Jenness are expected to comply with the stock ownership guidelines described in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Executive Compensation Policies — Executive Stock Ownership Guidelines.”

 

Kellogg Matching Grant Program.  Directors are eligible to participate in our Corporate Citizenship Fund Matching Grant Program, which is also available to all of our active, full-time U.S. employees. Under this program,

our Corporate Citizenship Fund matches 100 percent of donations made to eligible organizations up to a maximum of $10,000 per calendar year for each individual. These limits apply to both employees and Directors.

 

Discontinued Programs.  Prior to December 1995, we had a Director’s Charitable Awards Program pursuant to which each Director could name up to four organizations to which Kellogg would contribute an aggregate of $1 million upon the death of the Director. In 1995, the Board discontinued this program for Directors first elected after December 1995. In 2007, the following current Directors, who were first elected to the Board in 1995 or earlier, continued to be eligible to participate in this program: Mr. Gonzalez, Mr. Gund, Ms. McLaughlin Korologos and Dr. Zabriskie. We funded the cost of this program for three out of the four eligible Directors through the purchase of insurance policies prior to 2007. We will have to make cash payments in the future under this program if insurance proceeds are not available at the time of the Director’s death. There were no cash payments made in 2007 with respect to this program; however, in 2007, we recognized nonpension postretirement benefits expense associated with this obligation as follows: Mr. Gonzalez — $27,872, Mr. Gund — $22,777, Ms. McLaughlin Korologos — $18,787 and Dr. Zabriskie — $23,613. These benefits are not reflected in the Directors’ Compensation Table.

DIRECTORS’ COMPENSATION TABLE

 

The individual components of the total compensation calculation reflected in the table below are as follows:

 

Fees and Retainers.  The amounts shown under the heading “Fees Earned or Paid in Cash” consist of annual retainers and per meeting attendance fees earned by or paid in cash to our Directors in 2007.

 

Stock Awards.  The amounts disclosed under the heading “Stock Awards” consist of the compensation expense recognized by Kellogg in 2007 under Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (SFAS No. 123(R)) for either the annual grant of deferred shares of common stock, which are placed in the Kellogg Company Grantor Trust for Non-Employee Directors, or restricted stock awards granted prior to 2007. Under the terms of the Grantor Trust, shares are available to a Director only upon termination of service on the Board.

 

Option Awards.  The amounts disclosed under the heading “Option Awards” consist of the SFAS No. 123(R) compensation expense associated with the grant of options to purchase shares of common stock (including AOF options received by the Director). As discussed above, when a Director exercises an original option with an AOF, the AOF option is treated as a new grant for disclosure and accounting purposes even though the new grant relates back to the approval of the original grant.

 

All Other Compensation.  The amounts disclosed under the heading “All Other Compensation,” for Directors other than Mr. Jenness, consist of charitable matching contributions made under our Corporate Citizenship Fund Matching Grant Program. As discussed above, Mr. Jenness preferred not to receive compensation for 2007 in connection with transitioning into the executive Chairman position. However, Mr. Jenness retained the broad-based benefits received by other senior executives or as set forth in his 2004 employment agreement.

 

 

 

 

The table below presents the recognized compensation expense separately for regular options and AOF options received by our Directors in 2007:

 

 

 

 

 

We are required to provide information regarding the compensation program in place for our CEO, CFO and the three other most highly-compensated executive officers. We have also voluntarily elected to include information concerning an additional executive officer. In this proxy statement, we refer to our CEO, CFO and the other four most highly-compensated executive officers as our “Named Executive Officers” or “NEOs.” This section includes information regarding, among other things, the overall objectives of our compensation program and each element of compensation that we provide. This section should be read in conjunction with the detailed tables and narrative descriptions under “Executive Compensation” beginning on page 30 of this proxy statement.

 

Overview of Kellogg Company.  We are the world’s leading producer of cereal and a leading producer of convenience foods, including cookies, crackers, toaster pastries, cereal bars, fruit snacks, frozen waffles, and veggie foods. Kellogg products are manufactured and marketed globally.

 

We manage our company for sustainable performance defined by our long-term annual growth targets. During the periods presented in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 29, 2007, these targets were low single-digit for internal net sales, low to mid single-digit for internal operating profit, and high single-digit for net earnings per share. In combination with an attractive dividend yield, we believe this profitable growth has and will continue to provide a strong total return to our Shareowners. We plan to continue to achieve this sustainability through a strategy focused on growing our cereal business, expanding our snacks business, and pursuing selected growth opportunities. We support our business strategy with operating principles that emphasize profit-rich, sustainable sales growth, as well as cash flow and return on invested capital. We believe our steady earnings growth, strong cash flow and continued investment during a multi-year period of significant commodity and energy-driven cost inflation demonstrates the strength and flexibility of our business model.

 

Our Compensation Philosophy and Principles.  We operate in a competitive and challenging industry, both domestically and internationally. We believe that our executive compensation program for the CEO and the other NEOs should be designed to (a) provide a competitive level of total compensation necessary to attract and retain talented and experienced executives; (b) motivate them to contribute to our short- and long-term success; and (c) help drive strong total return to our Shareowners. Consistent with our business strategy discussed above, our executive compensation program is driven by the following principles:

 

 

 

Our Compensation Methodology.  The Compensation Committee of the Board is responsible for administering the compensation program for executive officers and certain other senior management of Kellogg. The Board has determined that each member of the Compensation Committee meets the definition of independence under our corporate governance guidelines and further qualifies as a non-employee Director for purposes of Rule 16b-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The members of the Compensation Committee are not current or former employees of Kellogg and are not eligible to participate in any of our executive compensation programs. Additionally, the Compensation Committee operates in a manner designed to meet the tax deductibility criteria included in Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. Refer to “Board and Committee Membership” beginning on page 9 for additional information about the Compensation Committee and its members.

 

To assist the Compensation Committee in discharging its responsibilities, the Compensation Committee has retained an independent compensation consultant — Towers Perrin. The consultant reports directly to the Compensation Committee. Other than the work it performs for the Compensation Committee and the Board, Towers Perrin does not provide any consulting services to Kellogg or its executive officers.

 

Each year, Towers Perrin presents the Compensation Committee with peer group benchmarking data and information about other relevant market practices and trends, and makes recommendations to the Compensation Committee regarding target levels for various elements of total compensation for senior executives, which the Compensation Committee reviews and considers in its deliberations. The CEO makes recommendations to the Compensation Committee regarding the compensation package for each of the NEOs (other than himself). Based on its review of the peer group information, individual performance, input from the compensation consultant and other factors, the Compensation Committee makes recommendations to the Board regarding the compensation for the CEO and the other NEOs. The independent members of the Board, meeting in executive session, determine the compensation of the CEO. The full Board determines the compensation of the other NEOs (unless an NEO is also a Director, in which case he abstains from the determination of his own compensation).

 

To ensure that our executive officer compensation is competitive in the marketplace, we benchmark ourselves against a comparator group (our “compensation peer group”). For 2007, our compensation peer group is comprised of the following branded consumer products companies:

 

 

We believe that our compensation peer group is representative of the market in which we compete for talent. The size of the group has been established so as to provide sufficient benchmarking data across the range of senior positions in Kellogg. Our compensation peer group companies were chosen because of their leadership positions in branded consumer products and their general relevance to Kellogg. The quality of these organizations has allowed Kellogg to maintain a high level of continuity in the peer group over many years, providing a consistent measure for benchmarking compensation. The Compensation Committee periodically reviews the compensation peer group to confirm that it continues to be an appropriate benchmark for our executive officers with respect to base salary, target annual and long-term incentives and total compensation.

 

All components of our executive compensation package are targeted at the 50th percentile of our compensation peer group. Actual pay varies from the 50th percentile based primarily on our performance relative to that of our performance peer group. Our “performance peer group” consists of the nine food companies in the broader compensation peer group (Campbell Soup Co., ConAgra Foods, Inc., General Mills, Inc., H.J. Heinz Co., The Hershey Co., Kraft Foods, Inc., PepsiCo Inc., Sara Lee Corporation and Wm. Wrigley Jr. Co.), plus Unilever N.V. and Nestlé S.A. The performance peer companies were chosen because they compete with us in the consumer marketplace and/or face similar business dynamics and challenges.

 

The Use of “Pay Tallies.”  The Compensation Committee annually reviews executive pay tallies for NEOs (detailing the executives’ annual pay — target and actual — and total accumulated wealth under various scenarios) to help ensure that the design of our program is consistent with our compensation philosophy and that the amount of compensation is within appropriate competitive parameters. The Compensation Committee finds tools like pay tallies helpful in its analysis of our program, but focuses more on the benchmarking results of the compensation peer group in determining specific compensation levels for the NEOs. Based on the Compensation Committee’s review of pay tallies in 2007, the Compensation Committee has concluded that the total compensation of the NEOs (and, in the case of the

severance and change-in-control scenarios, potential payouts) is appropriate and reasonable and, therefore, did not make any adjustments based on this review.

 

Elements of Our Compensation Program.  Our executive officer compensation package includes a combination of annual cash and long-term incentive compensation. Annual cash compensation for executive officers is comprised of base salary and the annual incentive plan (the Kellogg performance bonus plan). Long-term incentives currently consist of stock option grants and a three-year long-term performance plan.

 

Total Compensation.  The target for total compensation and each element of total compensation (salary, annual incentives, long-term incentives and benefits) is the 50th percentile of our compensation peer group. Compensation peer group practices are analyzed annually for base salary, target annual incentives and target long-term incentives, and periodically for other pay elements. In setting compensation of each executive, the Compensation Committee considers individual performance, experience in the role and contributions to achieving our business strategy.

 

We are unable to compare actual to target compensation on a percentile basis for our NEOs because actual compensation percentiles for the preceding fiscal year are not available. The companies in our compensation peer group do not all report actual compensation on the same twelve month basis. Even if this information were available we do not believe it would provide Shareowners with a fair understanding of our executive compensation program because actual compensation can be impacted by a variety of factors, including changes in stock prices, company performance and vesting of retirement benefits.

 

We apply the same philosophy, principles and methodology in determining the compensation for all of our NEOs, including the CEO. The differences in the amount of total compensation among our NEOs is a result of our benchmarking process and market-based approach. As discussed, the compensation package for each of the NEOs is intended to contain a mix of compensation elements that the Compensation Committee believes best reflects his responsibilities and that will best achieve our overall objectives. To that end, an executive’s compensation is generally designed so that performance based (or “at-risk”) compensation increases as a percentage of total targeted compensation as job responsibilities increase. One result of this structure is that the difference between actual total compensation for the CEO as compared to the other NEOs will be greater when Kellogg over-performs and less when Kellogg under-performs. In addition, the differences in actual compensation among the NEOs are directly impacted by (1) the amount of AOF options exercised and (2) whether an NEO became retirement eligible in 2007.

 

The basic construct of the primary elements of our 2007 executive officer pay package is outlined below.

 

 

In setting total compensation, we apply a consistent approach for all executive officers. The Compensation Committee also exercises appropriate business judgment in how it applies the standard approaches to the facts and circumstances associated with each executive. Additional detail about each pay element is presented below.

Base Salaries.  Data on salaries paid to comparable positions in our compensation peer group are gathered and reported to the Compensation Committee by the independent compensation consultant each year. The Compensation Committee, after receiving input from the compensation consultant, recommends to the Board the base salaries for the NEOs. The CEO provides input for the base salaries for the CFO and other NEOs. The Compensation Committee generally establishes base salaries for the NEOs at the 50th percentile of our compensation peer group. The salary of an executive is generally at, above or below the 50th percentile based on experience and proficiency in their role.

 

Mr. Mackay’s annualized base salary increased from $907,000 in 2006 to $1.1 million in 2007 in connection with becoming Chief Executive Officer on December 31, 2006, and in order to maintain market competitiveness for his base salary. In addition, in February 2007, the Compensation Committee approved salary increases for the other NEOs. These increases were made to maintain market competitiveness based on available market comparison data. After these adjustments, the Compensation Committee judged each NEO’s salary for 2007 to be correctly positioned relative to the 50th percentile for his position based on his experience, proficiency and sustained performance.

 

By policy, we require any executive base salary above $950,000 (after pre-tax deductions for benefits and similar items) to be deferred into deferred stock units under our Executive Deferral Program. This policy ensures that all base salary will be deductible under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. The deferred amounts are credited to an account in the form of units that are equivalent to the fair market value of our common stock. The units are payable in cash upon the executive’s termination from employment. As a result of pre-tax deductions elected by our NEOs (for example, participation in our Savings & Investment and Restoration Plans), none of our NEOs were affected by this policy in 2007.

 

Annual Incentives.  Annual incentive awards to the CEO, CFO and NEOs are paid under the terms of the Kellogg Senior Executive Annual Incentive Plan (“AIP”), which was approved by the Shareowners and is administered by the Compensation Committee. The total of all annual incentives granted in any one year under the AIP may not exceed 1% of our annual net income, as defined in the plan. We did not pay any bonuses outside of our AIP to our NEOs in 2007, other than the third and final installment of a relocation incentive premium payment paid to Mr. Mobsby. This payment was pursuant to Mr. Mobsby’s 2004 agreement described under “Employment Agreements — Mr. Mobsby.”

 

Awards granted to NEOs under the terms of the AIP are designed to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. Accordingly, objective measures were established within the first 90 days of fiscal 2007 in order to determine the performance levels that would qualify for maximum possible payouts under the 2007 AIP. These targets are tied to our projected operating plan and, therefore, their achievement is substantially uncertain at the time they are set. In February 2008, when our 2007 annual audited financial statements were completed, the Compensation Committee reviewed how well Kellogg performed versus the previously agreed upon targets established for purposes of Section 162(m). In each of the last three fiscal years, the targets set for purposes of Section 162(m) under the AIP have been reached. The Compensation Committee then uses a judgment-based methodology in exercising downward, negative discretion to determine the actual payout for each NEO.

 

As part of its judgment-based methodology, the Compensation Committee established at the beginning of fiscal 2007 for each NEO annual incentive opportunities as a percentage of an executive’s base salary, which were targeted at the 50th percentile of the compensation peer group. In addition, for each NEO, the Compensation Committee approved performance ranges (which we refer to as “bandwidths”) for internal operating profit, internal net sales and cash flow, aligning the middle of the bandwidths generally with the forecasted medians of the performance peer group and ensuring that maximums and minimums generally fall within the top and bottom quartiles respectively. Since target performance goals are generally set at the median of the performance peer group, actual performance above the median would result in incentive payments above the target level, with payments at the maximum level being made for performance in the top quartile of the performance peer group on a composite basis for all three AIP metrics. Conversely, performance below the median would generally result in incentive payments below the target level, with no payment being made for performance below a minimum threshold (generally set in the bottom quartile). The Compensation Committee and management believe that the metrics for the 2007 AIP — which are the same as the metrics used for the AIPs in the last several years — align well with our strategy of attaining sustainable growth. The specific targets and bandwidths set for the NEOs under the 2007 AIP are not disclosed because we believe disclosure of this information would cause Kellogg competitive harm. These targets and bandwidths are based on our confidential operating plan for the fiscal year. The bandwidths are intended to be realistic and reasonable, but challenging, in order to drive sustainable growth and performance on an individual basis.

 

Actual AIP payments each year can range from 0% to 200% of the target opportunity, based on corporate, business unit, and individual performance with the greatest emphasis placed on performance against the three AIP metrics —

internal operating profit, internal net sales, and cash flow. With respect to individual goals, the Compensation Committee considers an NEO’s individual achievements during the performance period relative to pre-established individual goals, including overall performance, behaving consistently with our “K Values,” and the extent to which each NEO has strengthened the culture and helped create the future for Kellogg. With respect to NEOs other than the CEO, the Committee also considers the CEO’s assessment of their individual performance.

 

At the beginning of fiscal 2007, Kellogg projected low single-digit growth for internal net sales, mid single-digit growth for internal operating profit and high single-digit growth for net earnings per share. Based on its financial results for fiscal 2007, Kellogg achieved mid single-digit growth for internal sales, achieved low single-digit growth for internal operating profit and exceeded high single-digit growth for net earnings per share, and its overall performance among these metrics ranked Kellogg in the second quartile of its performance peer group.

 

When evaluating Kellogg’s performance, the Compensation Committee may consider adjustments to ensure that AIP payouts are consistent with our overall compensation philosophy. In other words, any adjustments are made to ensure that compensation is competitive with the market, payouts are properly aligned with the Kellogg’s performance, and management operates the business to drive long-term sustainable growth. Consequently, the Compensation Committee would consider making adjustments based on the unbudgeted impact of investments in the business to drive long-term growth including some brand building initiatives, accounting charges, and other unusual or non-recurring gains or losses. In 2007, the Compensation Committee made an adjustment with respect to the unbudgeted impact of a cost savings initiative intended to drive long-term growth.

 

Based on this information and in exercising its judgment-based methodology, the Compensation Committee determined the percentage of AIP target achieved. The chart below includes information about 2007 AIP opportunities and actual payout.

 

 

 

 

Long-Term Incentives.  General.  Long-term incentive awards for the NEOs promote achieving our long-term corporate financial goals and earnings growth. Each year, the Compensation Committee reviews and recommends long-term incentive awards for each of the NEOs to the Board. In determining the total value of the long-term incentive opportunity for each executive, the Compensation Committee reviews the compensation peer group data presented by its compensation consultant on a position-by-position basis. Our long-term compensation program has consisted of a mix of stock options and performance-based stock awards, which the Compensation Committee evaluates each year.

 

Long-term incentives are provided to our executives under the 2003 Long-Term Incentive Plan, or “LTIP” (the LTIP was approved by Shareowners). The LTIP permits grants of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted shares and performance shares and units (such as Executive Performance Plan awards). The plan is intended to meet the deductibility

requirements of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code as performance-based pay (resulting in paid awards being tax deductible to Kellogg).

 

All of the 2007 long-term incentive opportunity was provided through equity-based awards, which the Compensation Committee believes best achieves the compensation principles for the program. For 2007, the Compensation Committee determined that the NEOs would receive 70% of their total long-term incentive opportunity in stock options and the remaining 30% in performance shares (granted under the Executive Performance Plan as discussed below). The Compensation Committee established this mix of awards after considering our compensation principles, compensation peer group practices and cost implications. The total amount of long-term incentives (based on the grant date expected value) is generally targeted at the 50th percentile of the compensation peer group.

 

Stock Options.  The Compensation Committee grants stock options to deliver competitive compensation that recognizes executives for their contributions to Kellogg and aligns executives with Shareowners in focusing on long-term growth and stock performance. These options provide value to the executive only if our stock price increases after the grants are made.

 

Stock options are granted annually to a wide range of employees (approximately 2,700 in 2007) based on pre-established grant guidelines calibrated to competitive standards and approved by the Compensation Committee under the LTIP. Prior to 2007, all options granted under the LTIP were granted with exercise prices equal to the average of the high and low trading prices of our stock on the date of grant. Beginning in 2007, the exercise price of our options is now set at the closing trading price on the date of grant. Our options have a ten-year term.

 

The options granted in 2007 become exercisable in two equal annual installments, with 50% vesting on February 16, 2008 (the first anniversary of the grant date), and the other 50% vesting on February 16, 2009 (the second anniversary of the grant date). The per-share exercise price for the stock options is $49.78, the closing trading price of Kellogg common stock on the date of the grant. The stock options expire on February 16, 2017. Approximately 84% of the stock options covered by the February 16, 2007 grant were made to employees other than the NEOs. Individual awards may vary from target levels based on the individual’s performance, ability to impact financial performance and future potential.

 

Executive Performance Plan.  The Executive Performance Plan (“EPP”) is a stock-based, pay-for-performance, multi-year incentive plan intended to focus senior management on achieving critical multi-year operational goals. These goals, such as cash flow, internal net sales growth and operating profit growth, are designed to increase Shareowner value. Approximately 100 of our most senior employees participate in the EPP, including the NEOs. Performance under EPP is measured over the three-year performance period based on performance levels set at the start of the period. Vested EPP awards are paid in Kellogg common stock.

 

2007-2009 EPP.  Similar to the AIP, awards granted to NEOs under the terms of the EPP are designed to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. Accordingly, an objective measure was established within the first 90 days of fiscal 2007 in order to determine the performance level that would qualify for maximum possible payouts under the EPP after the end of fiscal 2009. These targets are tied to our projected operating plan and, therefore, their achievement is substantially uncertain at the time they are set at the beginning of the performance period. The Compensation Committee approved the targets and bandwidths for the 2007-2009 EPP in the same manner as the targets and bandwidths for the AIP. The specific targets and bandwidths set for the NEOs are not disclosed because we believe disclosure of this information would cause Kellogg competitive harm. The bandwidths are based on our confidential long-range operating plan, and are intended to be realistic and reasonable, but challenging, in order to drive sustainable growth.

 

The Compensation Committee and management believe that the metric for the 2007-2009 EPP — cumulative cash flow — emphasizes the importance of cash flow in driving Shareowner value. Like with the AIP, once the Compensation Committee confirms the performance level delivered is at the level for which the NEOs are eligible to receive a payout under the EPP, the Compensation Committee uses a judgment-based methodology in exercising downward, negative discretion to determine the actual payout for each NEO. However, unlike the AIP, the Compensation Committee does not consider individual performance in determining payouts. The Compensation Committee weighs only company performance when determining actual payouts under the EPP. The Compensation Committee also takes into account the unbudgeted impact of unusual or nonrecurring gains and losses, accounting changes or other extraordinary events not foreseen at the time the performance goals or award opportunities were established.

 

The Compensation Committee set each individual’s target at 30% of his or her total long-term incentive opportunity. Participants in the EPP have the opportunity to earn between 0% and 200% of their EPP target. The 2007-2009 EPP cycle began on January 1, 2007 (first day of fiscal 2007) and concludes on January 2, 2010 (last day of fiscal 2009). Dividends

are not paid on unvested EPP awards. The 2007-2009 EPP award opportunities, presented in number of potential shares that can be earned, are included in the Grant of Plan-Based Awards Table on page 36 of this proxy statement.

 

2005-2007 EPP.  For the 2005-2007 EPP awards, the performance period ended on December 29, 2007 (the last day of fiscal 2007). In February 2008, when our 2007 annual audited financial statements were completed, the Compensation Committee reviewed our performance versus the internal net sales target established in 2005 for purposes of Section 162(m) and the relevant bandwidths. At the beginning of 2005, our stated goals were low single-digit growth in internal net sales. For the period covering 2005-2007, Kellogg achieved strong mid-single-digit growth which ranked at the top of the second quartile compared to our performance peer group. Despite actual internal net sales growth over the three year performance period exceeding the upper limit of the projected bandwidths established in 2005 for each NEO, the Compensation Committee followed its established precedent of capping payouts for EPP at 200% of target. The Compensation Committee did not make any adjustment when determining payouts under the 2005-2007 EPP. Because each NEO had to be actively employed by Kellogg on the date the awards were paid out, the 2005-2007 EPP awards did not vest until February 2008.

 

The chart below includes information about 2005-2007 EPP opportunities and actual payouts:

 

 

 

 

Restricted Stock.  In addition, we award restricted shares from time to time to selected executives and employees based on a variety of factors, including facilitating recruiting and retaining key executives. In 2007, none of our NEOs received a restricted stock award.

 

Post-Termination Compensation.  The NEOs are covered by arrangements which specify payments in the event the executive’s employment is terminated. These severance benefits, which are competitive with the compensation peer group and general industry practices, are payable if and only if the executive’s employment is terminated without cause.

 

The Kellogg Severance Benefit Plan and the Change in Control Policy have been established primarily to attract and retain talented and experienced executives and further motivate them to contribute to our short- and long-term success for the benefit of our Shareowners, particularly during uncertain times.

 

The Kellogg Severance Benefit Plan provides market-based severance benefits to employees who are terminated by Kellogg under certain circumstances. Kellogg benefits from this program in a variety of ways, including the fact that Kellogg has the right to receive a general release, non-compete, non-solicitation and non-disparagement provisions from separated employees.

 

The Change in Control Policy provides market-based benefits to executives in the event an executive is terminated without cause or the executive terminates employment for “good reason” in connection with a change in control. The Change in Control Policy protects Shareowner interests by enhancing employee focus during rumored or actual change in control activity by providing incentives to remain with Kellogg despite uncertainties while a transaction is under consideration or pending.

 

For more information, please refer to “Potential Post-Employment Payments,” which begins on page 46 of this proxy statement.

 

Retirement Plans.  Our CEO, CFO and other NEOs are eligible to participate in Kellogg-provided pension plans which provide benefits based on years of service and pay (salary plus annual incentive) to a broad base of employees. These NEOs are eligible to receive market-based benefits when they retire from Kellogg. The Compensation Committee utilizes an industry survey prepared by Hewitt & Associates to help determine the appropriate level of benefits. The

industry survey contains detailed retirement income benefit practices for a broad-based group of consumer products companies, which includes Kellogg, the companies in our compensation peer group (other than The Coca-Cola Co.) and the following additional consumer products companies: Armstrong World Industries, Inc., The Gillette Company, S.C. Johnson Consumer Products, L’Oreal USA, Inc., Johnson & Johnson, The Procter & Gamble Co., Nestle USA, Inc., Pfizer, Inc., R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company and Unilever United States, Inc. Rather than commissioning a customized survey, the Compensation Committee uses the same survey used by Kellogg to set these benefits for all U.S. salaried employees. Since our U.S.-based NEOs participate in the same plans (with exceptions noted) as all of our U.S. salaried employees, the industry survey is a cost-effective way to set these benefits. Based on the industry survey, the Compensation Committee targets the median retirement income replacement among similarly situated executives. The targeted amount of the total retirement benefits is provided through a combination of qualified and non-qualified defined contribution plans and qualified and non-qualified defined benefit plans. The plans are designed to provide an appropriate level of replacement income upon retirement. These benefits consist of:

 

 

Both our U.S. pension program and our U.S. savings and investment program include restoration plans for our U.S. executives, which allow us to provide benefits comparable to those which would be available under our IRS qualified plans if the IRS regulations did not include limits on covered compensation and benefits. We refer to these plans as “restoration plans” because they restore benefits that would otherwise be available under the plans in which substantially all of our U.S. salaried employees are eligible to participate. These plans use the same benefit formulas as our broad-based IRS qualified plans, and use the same types of compensation to determine benefit amounts.

 

Amounts earned under long-term incentive programs such as EPP, gains from stock options and awards of restricted stock are not included when determining retirement benefits for any employee (including executives). We do not pay above-market interest rates on amounts deferred under our savings and investment plans.

 

The amount of an employee’s compensation is an integral component of determining the benefits provided under pension and savings plan formulas, and thus an individual’s performance over time will influence the level of his or her retirement benefits. For more information, please refer to “Retirement and Non-Qualified Defined Contribution and Deferred Compensation Plans,” which begins on page 41 of this proxy statement.

 

As a result of his service while in the Great Britain and Ireland, Mr. Mobsby has accrued benefits under the Senior Executives Benefits Plan, which we refer to as the U.K. Executive Pension Plan, and the Kellogg Group Irish Pension Plan, Senior Executive Section, which we refer to as the Irish Executive Pension Plan. There is no additional non-qualified pension plan, as there is for U.S. executives, because applicable tax laws do not function in a way that would require us to “restore” benefits limited by the applicable tax laws. The U.K. Executive Pension Plan was developed 30 years ago based on what was allowable under U.K. tax law at the time. The Irish Executive Plan was developed to mirror the benefits of the U.K. Executive Pension Plan and, therefore, provides similar benefits that are calculated in the same way as the U.K. Executive Pension Plan.

 

Perquisites.  The Compensation Committee believes that it has taken a conservative approach to perquisites relative to other companies in the compensation peer group. For example, Kellogg does not provide company cars or club memberships to its U.S. NEOs. Perquisites provided to our foreign NEOs may vary depending on the standard market practices and regulations for the country in which an NEO is based. Pursuant to a policy adopted by the Board, our CEO is generally required, when practical, to use company aircraft for personal travel for security reasons. Personal use of company aircraft by other NEOs is infrequent. The Summary Compensation Table beginning on page 32 of this proxy statement contains itemized disclosure of all perquisites to our NEOs, regardless of amount.

 

Employee Stock Purchase Plan.  We have a tax-qualified employee stock purchase plan, which is made available to substantially all U.S. employees, which allows participants to acquire Kellogg stock at a discount price. The purpose of the plan is to encourage employees at all levels to purchase stock and become Shareowners. Prior to 2008, the plan allowed participants to buy Kellogg stock at 85% of the lower of the starting or ending market price for the period with up to 10% of their base salary (subject to IRS limits). As of January 1, 2008, the plan allows participants to buy Kellogg stock at a 5% discount to the market price. This change was made to reduce our overall compensation expense. Under applicable tax law, no plan participant may purchase more than $25,000 in market value (based on the market value of Kellogg stock on the last trading day prior to the beginning of the enrollment period for each subscription period) of

Kellogg stock in any calendar year. Although this benefit is generally available to all U.S. employees, we have included the compensation expense of any discounted stock purchased by our NEOs in the Summary Compensation Table.

 

The Kellogg Europe Trading Limited Employee Share Purchase Plan.  We have a tax qualified employee stock purchase plan, which is made available to all Irish tax-paying employees of Kellogg Europe Trading Limited, which we refer to as KETL, who have been with KETL or another company within Kellogg for three consecutive months (including Mr. Mobsby), which allows participants to invest in shares of Kellogg stock every three months and qualify for a 100% matching contribution of Kellogg stock (subject to Irish tax law limits). The purpose of the Kellogg Europe Trading Limited Employee Share Purchase Plan, which we refer to as the KPlan, is to provide KETL employees with the opportunity to acquire a stake in the future of Kellogg. The KPlan allows participants to buy the largest whole number of shares of Kellogg stock for an amount no less than €10 per month, but no more than 3.5% of one month’s net basic salary, and limited to a maximum value of €12,700 per tax year. Participants purchase these shares of Kellogg stock at the price at which those shares are available on the New York Stock Exchange. Participants in the KPlan must agree that all shares acquired under the plan be held on their behalf by a trustee for three years, subject to certain exceptions. Although this benefit is generally available to all employees of KETL, we have included the compensation expense of any matching stock received by Mr. Mobsby in the Summary Compensation Table.

 

Executive Compensation Policies.

 

Executive Stock Ownership Guidelines.  In order to preserve the linkage between the interests of senior executives and those of Shareowners, senior executives are expected to establish and maintain a significant level of direct stock ownership. This can be achieved in a variety of ways, including by retaining stock received upon exercise of options or the vesting of stock awards (including EPP awards), participating in the Employee Stock Purchase Plan and purchasing stock in the open market. The CEO’s stock ownership requirement under our stock ownership guidelines is five times annual base salary. The stock ownership requirement for our other NEOs under our stock ownership guidelines is three times annual base salary. Our current stock ownership guidelines (minimum requirements) are as follows:

 

 

These executives have five years from the date they first become subject to a particular level of the guidelines to meet them. All of our NEOs currently meet the guidelines, and all of our other senior executives currently meet or are on track to meet their ownership guideline. The Compensation Committee reviews compliance with the guidelines on an annual basis. Executives who are not in compliance with the guidelines may not sell stock without prior permission from our Chief Executive Officer, except for stock sales used to fund the payment of taxes and transaction costs incurred in connection with the exercise of options and the vesting of stock awards.

 

Practices Regarding the Grant of Equity Awards.  The Compensation Committee has generally followed a practice of making all option grants to executive officers on a single date each year. Prior to the relevant Compensation Committee meeting, the Compensation Committee reviews an overall stock option pool for all participating employees (approximately 2,700 in 2007) and recommendations for individual option grants to executives. Based on this review, the Compensation Committee approves the overall pool and the individual option grants to executives.

 

The Board grants these annual awards at its regularly-scheduled meeting in mid-February. The February meeting usually occurs within 2 or 3 weeks following our final earnings release for the previous fiscal year. We believe that it is appropriate that annual awards be made at a time when material information regarding our performance for the preceding year has been disclosed. We do not otherwise have any program, plan or practice to time annual option grants to our executives in coordination with the release of material non-public information. EPP Awards are granted at the same time as options.

 

While most of our option awards to NEOs have historically been made pursuant to our annual grant program, the Compensation Committee and Board retain the discretion to make additional awards of options or restricted stock to executives at other times for recruiting or retention purposes. We do not have any program, plan or practice to time “off-cycle” awards in coordination with the release of material non-public information.

 

All option awards made to our NEOs, or any of our other employees or Directors, are made pursuant to our LTIP. As noted above, prior to 2007, all options under the LTIP were granted with an exercise price equal to the average of the high and low trading prices of our stock on the date of grant. Beginning in 2007, the exercise price of our options is now

set at the closing trading price on the date of grant. We do not have any program, plan or practice of awarding options and setting the exercise price based on the stock’s price on a date other than the grant date, and we do not have a practice of determining the exercise price of option grants by using average prices (or lowest prices) of our common stock in a period preceding, surrounding or following the grant date. All grants to NEOs are made by the Board itself and not pursuant to delegated authority. Pursuant to authority delegated by the Board and subject to the Compensation Committee-approved allocation, awards of options to employees below the executive level are made by our CEO or other authorized senior executive officer.

 

Securities Trading Policy.  Our securities trading policy prohibits our Directors, executives and other employees from engaging in any transaction in which they may profit from short-term speculative swings in the value of our securities. This includes “short sales” (selling borrowed securities which the seller hopes can be purchased at a lower price in the future) or “short sales against the box” (selling owned, but not delivered securities), “put” and “call” options (publicly available rights to sell or buy securities within a certain period of time at a specified price or the like) and hedging transactions, such as zero-cost collars and forward sale contracts. In addition, this policy is designed to ensure compliance with relevant SEC regulations, including insider trading rules.

 

Recoupment of Option Awards.  We maintain clawback provisions relating to stock option exercises. Under these clawback provisions, if an executive voluntarily leaves our employment to work for a competitor within one year after any option exercise, then the executive must repay to Kellogg any gains realized from such exercise (but reduced by any tax withholding or tax obligations).

 

Deductibility of Compensation and Other Related Issues.  Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code includes potential limitations on the deductibility of compensation in excess of $1 million paid to the company’s CEO and four other most highly compensated executive officers serving on the last day of the year. Based on the regulations issued by the Internal Revenue Service, we have taken the necessary actions to ensure the deductibility of payments under the AIP and with respect to stock options and performance shares granted under our plans, whenever possible. We intend to continue to take the necessary actions to maintain the deductibility of compensation resulting from these types of awards. In contrast, restricted stock granted under our plans generally does not qualify as “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m). Therefore, the vesting of restricted stock in some cases will result in a loss of tax deductibility of compensation, including in the case of the CEO. We view preserving tax deductibility as an important objective, but not the sole objective, in establishing executive compensation. In specific instances we have and in the future may authorize compensation arrangements that are not fully tax deductible but which promote other important objectives of the company.

 

The Compensation Committee also reviews projections of the estimated accounting (pro forma expense) and tax impact of all material elements of the executive compensation program. Generally, accounting expense is accrued over the requisite service period of the particular pay element (generally equal to the performance period) and Kellogg realizes a tax deduction upon the payment to/realization by the executive. As a result of the impact AOF options have on our overall non-cash compensation expense, the Compensation Committee discontinued the use of the AOF in all new option grants after 2003. In 2006, the Compensation Committee also changed the AOF feature so that AOF options may be received only once each calendar year. This change began in 2007 and reduces our non-cash compensation expense resulting from AOF options.

 

 

As detailed in its charter, the Compensation Committee of the Board oversees our compensation program on behalf of the Board. In the performance of its oversight function, the Compensation Committee, among other things, reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis set forth in this proxy statement.

 

Based upon the review and discussions referred to above, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2007 and our proxy statement to be filed in connection with our 2008 Annual Meeting of Shareowners, each of which will be filed with the SEC.

 

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

 

Dr. John Zabriskie, Chair

Claudio Gonzalez

Gordon Gund

Ann McLaughlin Korologos

 

 

The following narrative, tables and footnotes describe the “total compensation” earned during 2006 and 2007 by our NEOs; however, 2006 information is not provided pursuant to the SEC’s rules and regulations for Messrs. Mobsby, Norman and Davidson because they were not named executive officers of Kellogg during fiscal 2006. The total compensation presented below does not reflect the actual compensation received by our NEOs in 2007 or the target compensation of our NEOs in 2006 and 2007. The actual value realized by our NEOs in 2007 from long-term incentives (options and restricted stock) is presented in the Option Exercises and Stock Vested Table on page 40 of this proxy statement. Target annual and long-term incentive awards for 2007 are presented in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards table on page 36 of this proxy statement.

 

The individual components of the total compensation calculation reflected in the Summary Compensation Table are broken out below:

 

Salary.  Base salary earned during 2007. Refer to “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Elements of Our Compensation Program — Base Salaries.”

 

Bonus.  We did not pay any bonuses to our NEOs in 2007, other than the third and final installment of a relocation incentive premium payment paid to Mr. Mobsby. This payment was pursuant to Mr. Mobsby’s 2004 agreement described under “Employment Agreements — Mr. Mobsby.” Each NEO earned an annual performance-based cash incentive under our AIP, as discussed below under “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation.” Refer to “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Elements of Our Compensation Program — Annual Incentives.”

 

Stock Awards.  The awards disclosed under the heading “Stock Awards” consist of:

 

 

The dollar amounts for the awards represent the grant-date fair value-based compensation expense recognized in 2007 and in 2006 under SFAS No. 123(R) for each NEO and as reported in our audited financial statements contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K. Details about the EPP awards granted in 2007 are included in the Grant of Plan-Based Awards Table below. Refer to also “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Elements of Our Compensation Program — Long-Term Incentives” for additional information. The recognized compensation expense of the stock-based awards will likely vary from the actual amount the NEO receives. The actual value the NEO receives will depend on the number of shares earned and the price of our common stock when the shares vest.

 

Option Awards.  The awards disclosed under the heading “Option Awards” consist of annual option grants (each a “regular option”) and accelerated ownership feature (“AOF”) option grants (each an “AOF option”) granted in 2007 and in 2006 and in prior fiscal years (to the extent such awards remained unvested in whole or in part at the beginning of fiscal 2007 and 2006, respectively). The dollar amounts for the awards represent the grant-date fair value-based compensation expense recognized in 2007 and in 2006 under SFAS No. 123(R) for each NEO and as reported in our audited financial statements contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K. Details about the option awards made during 2006 are included in the Grant of Plan-Based Awards Table below. Refer to also “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Elements of Our Compensation Program — Long-Term Incentives — Stock Options” for additional information. The recognized compensation expense of the stock option awards will likely vary from the actual value the NEO receives. The actual value the NEO receives will depend on the number of shares exercised and the price of our common stock on the date exercised.

 

Prior to 2004, we granted “original” options with an accelerated ownership feature (“AOF”). Under the terms of the original option grant, a new option, or “AOF option,” is generally received when Kellogg stock is used to pay the exercise price of a stock option and related taxes. The holder of the option receives an AOF option for the number of shares used.

For AOF options, the expiration date is the same as the original option and, beginning in January 2007, the option exercise price is the officially quoted closing price of our common stock on the date the AOF option is granted.

 

The Compensation Committee began using the AOF options over fifteen years ago in order to create greater stock ownership by encouraging Directors and executives to exercise valuable stock options and retain the shares received as a result of the option exercise. The Compensation Committee discontinued the use of the AOF feature in all new “original” option grants after 2003 to better align with peer group compensation practices and in anticipation of new accounting rules for the expensing of stock options. Although we discontinued the AOF feature in new option grants, a number of the outstanding options disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table were granted prior to 2004. Consequently, those AOF options could continue until their natural expiration date (generally, ten years after the date of the original grant). The Compensation Committee further changed the AOF options in 2007 so that they may only be exercised once each fiscal year. Prior to this change, AOF options were generally exercised twice during each fiscal year. Our overall stock option expense is reduced by limiting the number of times an AOF option can be exercised during any given fiscal year.

 

Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation.  The amount of Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation consists of the Kellogg Senior Executive Annual Incentive Plan (“AIP”) awards granted and earned in 2007 and in 2006. At the outset of 2007 and 2006, the Compensation Committee granted AIP awards to the CEO, CFO and the other NEOs. Such awards are based on our performance during 2007 and 2006, respectively, and were paid in March 2008 (for 2007 grants) and in March 2007 (for 2006 grants). For information on these awards refer to “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Elements of Our Compensation Program — Annual Incentives.”

 

Change in Pension Value.  The amounts disclosed under the heading “Change in Pension Value and Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings” solely represent the actuarial increase during 2007 and during 2006 in the pension value provided under the pension plans. Kellogg does not pay above-market or preferential rates on non-qualified deferred compensation for employees, including the NEOs. A detailed narrative and tabular discussion about our pension plans and non-qualified deferred compensation plans, our contributions to our pension plans and the estimated actuarial increase in the value of our pension plans are presented under the heading “Retirement and Non-Qualified Defined Contribution and Deferred Compensation Plans.”

 

All Other Compensation.  Consistent with our emphasis on performance-based pay, perquisites and other compensation are limited in scope and primarily comprised of retirement benefit contributions and accruals for NEOs based in the United States.

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

 

It is important to note that the information required by the Summary Compensation Table does not necessarily reflect the target or actual compensation for our NEOs in 2007 and in 2006. In addition, the SEC regulations and accounting rules require certain compensation expense reflected in the table to be recognized immediately if any of the NEOs were retirement eligible in 2007 and in 2006, respectively.