UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

þ		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended: June 30, 2007

o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Belo Corp.

Delaware		75-0135890
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. employer identification no.)
P. O. Box 655237
Dallas, Texas		75265-5237
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (214) 977-6606

Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report.

Indicate by check mark whether registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes þ      No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes o      No þ

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Class		Outstanding at June 30, 2007
Common Stock, $1.67 par value		102,203,383*

*		Consisting of 87,941,349 shares of Series A Common Stock and 14,262,034 shares of Series B Common Stock.

 

 

BELO CORP.
FORM 10-Q
TABLE OF CONTENTS

				Page
PART I		FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.		Financial Statements		1
Item 2.		Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		8
Item 3.		Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		18
Item 4.		Controls and Procedures		18
PART II		OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.		Legal Proceedings		18
Item 1A.		Risk Factors		19
Item 2.		Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		19
Item 3.		Defaults Upon Senior Securities		20
Item 4.		Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders		20
Item 5.		Other Information		20
Item 6.		Exhibits		21
		Signatures		25

PART I

Item 1. Financial Statements

CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS
Belo Corp. and Subsidiaries

		Three months ended								Six months ended
		June 30,								June 30,
In thousands, except per share amounts (unaudited)		2007				2006				2007				2006
Net Operating Revenues		$	390,505			$	403,557			$	744,560			$	775,280
Operating Costs and Expenses
Salaries, wages and employee benefits			138,538				142,472				278,915				290,838
Other production, distribution and operating costs			125,752				123,596				243,099				235,426
Newsprint, ink and other supplies			26,332				34,227				53,179				70,905
Depreciation			23,325				22,272				46,091				44,088
Amortization			1,625				2,087				3,691				4,174
Total operating costs and expenses			315,572				324,654				624,975				645,431
Earnings from operations			74,933				78,903				119,585				129,849
Other Income and Expense
Interest expense			(24,248	)			(24,430	)			(48,399	)			(48,092	)
Other income, net			3,245				8,852				8,613				9,700
Total other income and expense			(21,003	)			(15,578	)			(39,786	)			(38,392	)
Earnings
Earnings before income taxes			53,930				63,325				79,799				91,457
Income taxes			17,508				20,666				27,926				31,498
Net earnings		$	36,422			$	42,659			$	51,873			$	59,959
Net earnings per share
Basic		$	.36			$	.41			$	.51			$	.57
Diluted		$	.35			$	.41			$	.50			$	.57
Weighted average shares outstanding
Basic			102,222				104,307				102,246				105,219
Diluted			103,178				104,474				103,035				105,523
Dividends declared per share		$	—			$	—			$	.125			$	.10

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements.

CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
Belo Corp. and Subsidiaries

In thousands, except share and per share amounts		June 30,				December 31,
(Current year unaudited)		2007				2006
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and temporary cash investments		$	26,544			$	46,291
Accounts receivable, net			257,011				276,825
Other current assets			56,972				61,047
Total current assets			340,527				384,163
Property, plant and equipment, net			547,572				560,494
Intangible assets, net			1,337,193				1,336,870
Goodwill, net			1,237,898				1,237,348
Other assets			94,274				95,403
Total assets		$	3,557,464			$	3,614,278
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable		$	47,330			$	79,605
Accrued expenses			92,212				102,004
Dividends payable			—				12,903
Other current liabilities			59,695				64,400
Total current liabilities			199,237				258,912
Long-term debt			1,247,982				1,283,434
Deferred income taxes			432,466				435,154
Other liabilities			110,292				109,630
Shareholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $1.00 par value. Authorized 5,000,000 shares; none issued.
Common stock, $1.67 par value. Authorized 450,000,000 shares
Series A: Issued 87,941,349 shares at June 30, 2007 and 87,706,833 shares at December 31, 2006			146,862				146,471
Series B: Issued 14,262,034 shares at June 30, 2007 and 14,589,345 shares at December 31, 2006			23,818				24,364
Additional paid-in capital			897,393				886,501
Retained earnings			537,033				506,807
Accumulated other comprehensive loss			(37,619	)			(36,995	)
Total shareholders’ equity			1,567,487				1,527,148
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity		$	3,557,464			$	3,614,278

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements.

CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Belo Corp. and Subsidiaries

		Six months ended June 30,
In thousands (unaudited)		2007				2006
Operations
Net earnings		$	51,873			$	59,959
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operations:
Depreciation and amortization			49,782				48,262
Deferred income taxes			—				(3,813	)
Share-based compensation			8,537				8,330
Other non-cash expenses			103				5,913
Equity in earnings from partnerships			(661	)			(632	)
Other, net			(1,400	)			(5,499	)
Net change in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable			19,795				1,710
Other current assets			1,106				(2,101	)
Accounts payable			(32,275	)			(31,700	)
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities			(7,263	)			1,282
Interest payable			(561	)			1,276
Income taxes payable			(9,745	)			9,378
Net cash provided by operations			79,291				92,365
Investments
Capital expenditures			(29,736	)			(34,073	)
Acquisition			(4,268	)			—
Other investments			(4	)			1,091
Other, net			648				537
Net cash used for investments			(33,360	)			(32,445	)
Financing
Net proceeds from revolving debt			661,827				296,980
Payments on revolving debt			(462,867	)			(441,855	)
Net proceeds from issuance of senior notes			—				248,903
Redemption of senior notes			(234,477	)			—
Payment of dividends			(25,688	)			(21,117	)
Net proceeds from exercise of stock options			12,004				4,677
Purchase of treasury stock			(17,152	)			(103,054	)
Excess tax benefit from option exercises			675				296
Net cash used for financing			(65,678	)			(15,170	)
Net increase(decrease) in cash and temporary cash investments			(19,747	)			44,750
Cash and temporary cash investments at beginning of period			46,291				33,243
Cash and temporary cash investments at end of period		$	26,544			$	77,993
Supplemental Disclosures
Interest paid, net of amounts capitalized		$	49,025			$	46,805
Income taxes paid, net of refunds		$	38,289			$	23,507

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Belo Corp. and Subsidiaries
(in thousands, except per share amounts)

(1)		The accompanying unaudited consolidated condensed financial statements of Belo Corp. and subsidiaries (the “Company” or “Belo”) have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. The balance sheet at December 31, 2006 has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements at that date but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements.
		In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2007 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2007. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.

(2)

The following table sets forth the reconciliation between weighted average shares used for calculating basic and diluted earnings per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006:

		Three months ended								Six months ended
		June 30,								June 30,
		2007				2006				2007				2006
Weighted average shares for basic earnings per share			102,222				104,307				102,246				105,219
Effect of employee stock options and restricted stock units			956				167				789				304
Weighted average shares for diluted earnings per share			103,178				104,474				103,035				105,523
Options excluded due to exercise price in excess of average market price
Number outstanding			7,231				9,772				7,490				7,667
Weighted average exercise price		$	24.76			$	23.42			$	24.60			$	24.60
Restricted stock units excluded due to performance conditions not probable of being achieved
Number outstanding			451				186				451				186
Weighted average exercise price		$	18.13			$	21.62			$	18.13			$	21.62

(3)

On January 1, 2007, the Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation (FIN) 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes.” FIN 48, an interpretation of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes,” clarifies the accounting and disclosure requirements for uncertainty in tax positions as defined by the standard. In connection with the adoption of FIN 48, the Company has analyzed its filing positions in all significant jurisdictions where it is required to file income tax returns for the open tax years in such jurisdictions. The Company has identified as major tax jurisdictions, as defined, its federal income tax return and its state income tax returns in five states. The Company’s federal income tax returns for the years subsequent to December 31, 2002, remain subject to examination. The Company’s income tax returns in major state income tax jurisdictions remain subject to examination for various periods subsequent to December 31, 2001. The Company currently believes that all significant filing positions are highly certain and that, more likely than not, all of its significant income tax filing positions and deductions would be sustained. Therefore, the Company has no significant reserves for uncertain tax positions and no adjustments to such reserves were required upon the adoption of FIN 48. If interest and penalties are assessed, interest costs will be recognized in interest expense and penalties will be recognized in operating expenses.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 157, “Fair Value Measurements.” SFAS 157 establishes, among other items, a framework for fair value measurements in the financial statements by providing a single definition of fair value, provides guidance on the methods used to estimate fair value and increases disclosures about estimates of fair value. The effective date of SFAS 157 for the Company is January 1, 2008. The Company is evaluating the effect of the adoption of this standard.

(4)		Belo has a long-term incentive plan under which awards may be granted to employees and outside directors in the form of non-qualified stock options, incentive stock options, restricted shares, restricted stock units, performance shares, performance units or stock appreciation rights, the basis of which is Belo’s long-term performance. In addition, options may be accompanied by stock appreciation rights and limited stock appreciation rights. Rights and limited rights may also be issued without accompanying options. Cash bonus awards are also available under the plan. The Company believes that the long-term incentive plan better aligns the interests of its employees with those of its shareholders.
		Share-based compensation cost was $4,112 and $3,722, for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and $9,574 and $8,405, for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The total income tax benefit recognized in equity for share-based compensation arrangements was $665 for the three months ended June 30, 2007. There was no income tax benefit recognized in the three months ended June 30, 2006. The total income tax benefit recognized in equity for share-based compensation arrangements was $675 and $296, for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

(5)		The Company froze benefits under its defined benefit pension plan (Pension Plan) effective March 31, 2007. As part of the curtailment of the Pension Plan, the Company announced that it will provide transition benefits to affected employees, including the granting of five years of additional credited service under the Pension Plan and supplemental contributions for a period of up to five years to a defined contribution plan for the benefit of those employees affected by these changes who remain with the Company.
		The net periodic pension (income) cost for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 includes the following components:

		Three months ended								Six months ended
		June 30,								June 30,
		2007				2006				2007				2006
Service cost — benefits earned during the period		$	—			$	3,012			$	1,835			$	6,025
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation			7,316				7,165				14,633				14,329
Expected return on assets			(9,087	)			(8,576	)			(18,174	)			(17,152	)
Amortization of net loss			480				1,720				959				3,439
Amortization of unrecognized prior service cost			—				154				—				308
Net periodic pension (income) cost		$	(1,291	)		$	3,475			$	(747	)		$	6,949

In the first six months of 2007, the Company did not make any contributions to its defined benefit pension plan. The Company does not expect to make any contributions to the plan during 2007.

(6)

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, total comprehensive income was comprised as follows:

		Three months ended								Six months ended
		June 30,								June 30,
		2007				2006				2007				2006
Net earnings		$	36,422			$	42,659			$	51,873			$	59,959
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Pension benefit obligation adjustments, net of taxes of $168 and $335, respectively			(312	)			—				(624	)			—
Other comprehensive income (loss)			(312	)			—				(624	)			—
Comprehensive income		$	36,110			$	42,659			$	51,249			$	59,959

(7)

Long-term debt consists of the following at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006:

		June 30, 2007				December 31, 2006
7-1/8% Senior Notes Due June 1, 2007		$	—			$	234,477
8% Senior Notes Due November 1, 2008			350,000				350,000
6-3/4% Senior Notes Due May 30, 2013			249,022				248,957
7-3/4% Senior Debentures Due June 1, 2027			200,000				200,000
7-1/4% Senior Debentures Due September 15, 2027			250,000				250,000
Total Fixed-rate debt			1,049,022				1,283,434
Revolving credit agreement, including short-term unsecured notes			185,000				—
Uncommitted line of credit			13,960				—
Total Long-term		$	1,247,982			$	1,283,434

On June 1, 2007, the Company repaid the remaining outstanding balance of the 7-1/8% Senior Notes of $234,477 at their maturity using available cash balances and borrowings under the Company’s variable-rate revolving credit facility and its uncommitted lines of credit.

(8)		Belo operates its business in two primary reporting segments, the Television Group and the Newspaper Group. For the Television Group, Belo’s operating segments are defined as its television stations and cable news channels within a given market. These operating segments are aggregated into the Television Group. For the Newspaper Group, Belo’s operating segments are defined as its newspapers within a given market. These operating segments are aggregated into the Newspaper Group. Belo’s various operating segments share content at no cost.
		Management uses segment EBITDA as the primary measure of profitability to evaluate operating performance and to allocate capital resources and bonuses to eligible operating company employees. Segment EBITDA represents a segment’s earnings before interest expense, income taxes, depreciation and amortization. Other income (expense), net is not allocated to the Company’s operating segments because it consists primarily of equity earnings (losses) from investments in partnerships and joint ventures and other non-operating income (expense).
		Net operating revenues and segment EBITDA by segment, along with a reconciliation of total segment EBITDA to net earnings, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 are shown below.

		Three months ended								Six months ended
		June 30,								June 30,
		2007				2006				2007				2006
Net Operating Revenues
Television Group		$	198,229			$	193,326			$	376,571			$	368,018
Newspaper Group			192,276				210,231				367,989				407,262
Total net operating revenues		$	390,505			$	403,557			$	744,560			$	775,280
Segment EBITDA
Television Group		$	82,275			$	83,511			$	148,750			$	150,158
Newspaper Group			42,542				45,239				67,208				72,815
Corporate			(24,934	)			(25,488	)			(46,591	)			(44,862	)
Total segment EBITDA		$	99,883			$	103,262			$	169,367			$	178,111
Other income, net			3,245				8,852				8,613				9,700
Depreciation and amortization			(24,950	)			(24,359	)			(49,782	)			(48,262	)
Interest expense			(24,248	)			(24,430	)			(48,399	)			(48,092	)
Income taxes			(17,508	)			(20,666	)			(27,926	)			(31,498	)
Net earnings		$	36,422			$	42,659			$	51,873			$	59,959

(9)

On August 23, 2004, August 26, 2004 and October 5, 2004, respectively, three related lawsuits were filed by purported shareholders of the Company in the United States District Court for the Northern District of

		Texas against the Company, Robert W. Decherd and Barry Peckham. The complaints arise out of the circulation overstatement at The Dallas Morning News announced by the Company in 2004, alleging that the overstatement artificially inflated Belo’s financial results and thereby injured investors. The plaintiffs seek to represent a purported class of shareholders who purchased Belo common stock between May 12, 2003 and August 6, 2004. The complaints allege violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. On October 18, 2004, the court ordered the consolidation of all cases arising out of the same facts and presenting the same claims, and on February 7, 2005, plaintiffs filed an amended, consolidated complaint adding as defendants John L. Sander, Dunia A. Shive, Dennis A. Williamson and James M. Moroney III. On May 18, 2007, the court partially granted defendants’ motions to dismiss plaintiffs’ second amended complaint to the extent it dismissed plaintiffs’ complaint as to defendants John L. Sander, Dunia A. Shive and Dennis A. Williamson. The motions to dismiss were denied as to the other defendants. No class or classes have been certified and no amount of damages has been specified. The Company believes the complaints are without merit and intends to vigorously defend against them.
		On June 3, 2005, a shareholder derivative lawsuit was filed by a purported individual shareholder of the Company in the 191st Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas, against Robert W. Decherd, Dennis A. Williamson, Dunia A. Shive and John L. Sander, all of whom are current or retired executive officers of the Company; James M. Moroney III, an executive officer of The Dallas Morning News; Barry Peckham, a former executive officer of The Dallas Morning News; and Louis E. Caldera, Judith L. Craven, Stephen Hamblett, Dealey D. Herndon, Wayne R. Sanders, France A. Córdova, Laurence E. Hirsch, J. McDonald Williams, Henry P. Becton, Jr., Roger A. Enrico, William T. Solomon, Lloyd D. Ward, M. Anne Szostak and Arturo Madrid, current or former directors of the Company. The lawsuit makes various claims asserting mismanagement and breach of fiduciary duty related to the circulation overstatement at The Dallas Morning News. On May 30, 2007, after a prior discovery stay ended, the court issued an order administratively closing the case. Under the court’s order, the case is stayed and, as a result, no further action can be taken in the proceeding unless the case is reinstated. The court retained jurisdiction and the case is subject to being reinstated by the court or upon motion by any party. The court’s order was not a dismissal with prejudice.
		In 2004, the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) notified the Company that the staff was conducting a newspaper industry-wide inquiry into circulation practices, and inquired specifically about The Dallas Morning News’ circulation overstatement. The Company has briefed the SEC on The Dallas Morning News circulation situation and related matters. The information voluntarily provided to the SEC relates to The Dallas Morning News, as well as The Providence Journal and The Press-Enterprise. The Company will continue to respond to additional requests for information that the SEC may have.
		A number of other legal proceedings are pending against the Company, including several actions for alleged libel and/or defamation. In the opinion of management, liabilities, if any, arising from these other legal proceedings would not have a material adverse effect on the results of operations, liquidity or financial position of the Company.
(10)		In December 2005, the Company entered into a construction contract with Austin Commercial, L.P. relating to the new Dallas Morning News distribution and production center in southern Dallas. The contract provides for total payments of approximately $16,055, of which approximately $104 and $2,859 was paid during the three months ended June 30, 2007, and 2006, respectively and approximately $2,277 and $3,501 was paid during the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Approximately $15,994 has been paid since the inception of the contract. At June 30, 2007, there was a balance due of approximately $61. Bill Solomon, a member of Belo’s Board of Directors, is Chairman of Austin Industries, Inc., the parent company of Austin Commercial, L.P.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

             (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

The following information should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements and related Notes filed as part of this report.

Overview

Belo Corp. (“Belo” or the “Company”), a Delaware corporation, began as a Texas newspaper company in 1842 and today is one of the nation’s largest media companies with a diversified group of market-leading television broadcasting, newspaper publishing, cable news and interactive media operations. A Fortune 1000 company with approximately $1.6 billion in revenues for the year ended December 31, 2006, Belo operates news and information franchises in some of America’s most dynamic markets and regions. The Company owns 20 television stations (six in the top 15 U.S. markets) that reach 14 percent of U.S. television households, and manages one television station through a local marketing agreement (“LMA”). In addition, Belo owns two regional and two local cable news channels and holds ownership interests in two others. Belo’s daily newspapers are The Dallas Morning News, The Providence Journal, The Press-Enterprise (Riverside, CA) and the Denton Record-Chronicle (Denton, TX). Belo operates more than 30 Web sites, participates in several interactive alliances and offers a broad range of Internet-based products.

Belo operates its business in two primary reporting segments, the Television Group and the Newspaper Group. The Television Group consists of the Company’s 20 television stations, one station operated under an LMA and four cable news channels, along with its ownership interests in two other cable news channels. The Newspaper Group consists of the Company’s four daily newspapers, various niche publications in the same markets and Belo’s commercial printing businesses. Both segments operate within the United States and compete against similar and other types of media on a local, regional and national basis.

The following tables set forth the Company’s major media assets by segment as of June 30, 2007:

Television Group

										Year																Number of								Station
										Belo																Commercial				Station				Audience
		Market				Station/				Acquired				Network				Analog				Digital				Stations in				Rank in				Share in
Market		Rank(1)				News Channel				/ Started				Affiliation				Channel				Channel				Market(2)				Market(3)				Market(4)
Dallas/Fort Worth			6			WFAA					1950			ABC					8				8.1				16				1				12
Dallas/Fort Worth			6			TXCN					1999			IND					N/A				N/A				N/A				N/A				N/A
Houston			10			KHOU					1984			CBS					11				11.1				15				1	*			11
Phoenix			13			KTVK					1999			IND					3				3.1				13				1	*			6
Phoenix			13			KASW					2000			CW					61				61.1				13				7	*			3
Seattle/Tacoma			14			KING					1997			NBC					5				5.1				13				1	*			12
Seattle/Tacoma			14			KONG					2000			IND					16				16.1				13				5	*			2
Seattle/Tacoma			14			NWCN					1997			IND					N/A				N/A				N/A				N/A				N/A
St. Louis			21			KMOV					1997			CBS					4				4.1				8				2	*			12
Portland			23			KGW					1997			NBC					8				8.1				8				1				11
Charlotte			26			WCNC					1997			NBC					36				36.1				8				3	*			7
San Antonio			37			KENS					1997			CBS					5				5.1				10				2				10
San Antonio(5)			37			KCWX					—			CW					2				N/A				10				9	*			1
Hampton/Norfolk			42			WVEC					1984			ABC					13				13.1				8				1				13
Louisville			48			WHAS					1997			ABC					11				11.1				7				1	*			12
Austin			52			KVUE					1999			ABC					24				24.1				7				1				11
New Orleans (6)			54			WWL					1994			CBS					4				4.1				8				1	(7)			18	(7)
New Orleans			54			WUPL					2007			MNTV					54				54.1				8					(8)				(8)
Tucson			70			KMSB					1997			FOX					11				11.1				9				4	*			4
Tucson			70			KTTU					2002			MNTV					18				18.1				9				6				2
Spokane			77			KREM					1997			CBS					2				2.1				7				2				14
Spokane			77			KSKN					2001			CW					22				22.1				7				4	*			3
Boise(9)(10)			118			KTVB					1997			NBC					7				7.1				5				1				24

Newspaper Group

						Belo Acquired				Daily				Sunday
Newspaper		Location				/Started				Circulation (1)				Circulation
The Dallas Morning News		Dallas, TX				October 1885					409,968	(2)			563,079	(2)
The Providence Journal		Providence, RI				February 1997					155,155	(3)			205,102	(3)
The Press-Enterprise		Riverside, CA				July 1997					173,015	(4)			178,062	(4)
Denton Record-Chronicle		Denton, TX				June 1999					13,209	(5)			16,028	(5)

The Company intends for the discussion of its financial condition and results of operations that follows to provide information that will assist in understanding the Company’s financial statements, the changes in certain key items in those statements from period to period and the primary factors that accounted for those changes, as well as how certain accounting principles, policies and estimates affect the Company’s financial statements. The discussion of results of operations at the consolidated level is followed by a more detailed discussion of results of operations by segment.

Results of Operations
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

Consolidated Results of Operations

		Three months ended June 30,												Six months ended June 30,
						Percentage												Percentage
		2007				Change				2006				2007				Change				2006
Net operating revenues		$	390,505				(3.2	%)		$	403,557			$	744,560				(4.0	%)		$	775,280
Operating costs and expenses			315,572				(2.8	%)			324,654				624,975				(3.2	%)			645,431
Earnings from operations			74,933				(5.0	%)			78,903				119,585				(7.9	%)			129,849
Other income (expense)			(21,003	)			(34.8	%)			(15,578	)			(39,786	)			3.6	%			(38,392	)
Earnings before income taxes			53,930				(14.8	%)			63,325				79,799				(12.7	%)			91,457
Income taxes			(17,508	)			(15.3	%)			(20,666	)			(27,926	)			(11.3	%)			(31,498	)
Net earnings		$	36,422				(14.6	%)		$	42,659			$	51,873				(13.5	%)		$	59,959

Total net operating revenue decreased $13,052, or 3.2 percent, from $403,557 in the second quarter 2006 to $390,505 in the second quarter 2007 due to revenue decreases of $17,955 in the Newspaper Group primarily related to decreases in advertising revenues partially offset by an increase of $4,903 in the Television Group primarily related to increases in local spot advertising revenue, Internet advertising revenue and retransmission fees.

Total net operating revenue decreased $30,720, or 4.0 percent, from $775,280 in the six months ended June 30, 2006, to $744,560 in the six months ended June 30, 2007 due to revenue decreases of $39,273 in the Newspaper Group primarily related to decreases in advertising revenues partially offset by an increase of $8,553 in the Television Group primarily related to increases in local and national spot advertising revenue, Internet advertising revenue and retransmission fees.

Operating costs and expenses decreased $9,082, or 2.8 percent, from $324,654 in the second quarter 2006 to $315,572 in the second quarter 2007. Salaries, wages and employee benefits expense decreased $3,934, or 2.8 percent, in the second quarter 2007 as compared to the prior year period. This decrease was primarily due to a decrease in full and part-time salaries of $2,097 because of a decrease in headcount. In addition a decrease in estimated pension expense of $1,940 resulted from the Company’s curtailment of its defined benefit pension plan effective March 31, 2007, and an increase in the discount rate applied to future pension obligations. Other production, distribution and operating costs increased $2,156, or 1.7 percent, in the second quarter 2007 as

compared to the second quarter 2006, primarily due to an increase of $2,370 in charitable contributions resulting from the donation of a tract of land to benefit the City of Dallas, Texas. Newsprint, ink and other supplies decreased $7,895, or 23.1 percent, in the second quarter 2007 as compared to the year-earlier period primarily due to lower newsprint costs, which is a combination of lower prices and lower volume.

Operating costs and expenses decreased $20,456, or 3.2 percent, from $645,431 in the six months ended June 30, 2006 to $624,975 in the six months ended June 30, 2007. Salaries, wages and employee benefits expense decreased $11,923, or 4.1 percent, in the six months ended June 30, 2007 as compared to the prior year period. This decrease was primarily due to a decrease in full and part-time salaries of $5,429 because of a decrease in headcount. In addition a decrease in estimated pension expense of $4,868 was primarily due to the Company’s curtailment of its defined benefit pension, and an increase in the discount rate applied to future pension obligations. Other production, distribution and operating costs increased $7,673, or 3.3 percent, in the six months ended June 30, 2007 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2006, primarily due to an increase of $7,415 in outside services attributable to costs associated with technology outsourcing announced in the second quarter 2006. Newsprint, ink and other supplies decreased $17,726, or 25.0 percent, in the six months ended June 30, 2007 as compared to the year-earlier period primarily due to lower newsprint costs, which is a combination of lower prices and lower volume.

Other income, net decreased $5,607, or 63.3 percent, in the second quarter 2007 compared to the second quarter 2006 primarily because in the second quarter 2006, the Company recorded a one-time gain of $7,536 in miscellaneous income related to a payment associated with a change-in-control provision in one of Belo’s vendor contracts.

Other income, net decreased $1,087, or 11.2 percent, in the six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2006. In 2006, the Company recorded a one-time gain of $7,536 in miscellaneous income related to a payment associated with a change-in-control provision in one of Belo’s vendor contracts. The decrease related to this gain was partially offset by the receipt in 2007 of a $4,000 insurance settlement related to losses suffered from Hurricane Katrina.

Income taxes decreased $3,158, or 15.3 percent, for the three months ended June 30, 2007, compared with the three months ended June 30, 2006, primarily due to lower taxable income and adjustments related to the implementation of the State of Texas margin tax. In future periods, estimated state taxes related to the State of Texas margin tax are expected to increase.

Income taxes decreased $3,572, or 11.3 percent, for the six months ended June 30, 2007, compared with the six months ended June 30, 2006, primarily due to lower taxable income and adjustments related to the implementation of the State of Texas margin tax. In future periods, estimated state taxes related to the State of Texas margin tax are expected to increase.

As a result of the factors discussed above, net earnings for the three months ended June 30, 2007 decreased to $36,422 (35 cents per share) from $42,659 (41 cents per share) in the three months ended June 30, 2006. Net earnings for the six months ended June 30, 2007 decreased to $51,873 (50 cents per share) from $59,959 (57 cents per share) for the six months ended June 30, 2006.

The Company defines Consolidated EBITDA as net earnings before interest expense, income taxes, depreciation and amortization. Consolidated EBITDA is not a measure of financial performance under GAAP. Management uses Consolidated EBITDA in internal analyses as a supplemental measure of the financial performance of the Company to assist it in determining performance comparisons against its peer group of companies, as well as capital spending and other investing decisions. Consolidated EBITDA is also a common alternative measure of performance used by investors, financial analysts, and rating agencies to evaluate financial performance. Consolidated EBITDA should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for net earnings, operating income, cash flows provided by operating activities or other income or cash flow data prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and this non-GAAP measure may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies.

The following table presents a reconciliation of Consolidated EBITDA to net earnings for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006:

		Three months ended June 30,												Six months ended June 30,
						Percentage												Percentage
		2007				Change				2006				2007				Change				2006
Consolidated EBITDA		$	103,128				(8.0	%)		$	112,114			$	177,980				(5.2	%)		$	187,811
Depreciation and amortization			(24,950	)			2.4	%			(24,359	)			(49,782	)			3.1	%			(48,262	)
Interest expense			(24,248	)			(0.7	%)			(24,430	)			(48,399	)			0.6	%			(48,092	)
Income taxes			(17,508	)			(15.3	%)			(20,666	)			(27,926	)			(11.3	%)			(31,498	)
Net earnings		$	36,422				(14.6	%)		$	42,659			$	51,873				(13.5	%)		$	59,959

Consolidated EBITDA decreased $8,986, or 8.0 percent, in the three months ended June 30, 2007, compared to the three months ended June 30, 2006, primarily due to a decrease in other income (expense) net, related to the one-time gain of $7,536 in miscellaneous income related to a payment associated with a change-in-control provision in one of Belo’s vendor contracts recorded in the second quarter 2006. Additionally, the Newspaper Group recorded a decrease of $2,697 in segment EBITDA and the Television Group recorded a decrease of $1,236 in segment EBITDA.

Consolidated EBITDA decreased $9,831, or 5.2 percent, in the six months ended June 30, 2007, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2006, primarily due to a decrease of $5,607 in Newspaper Group segment EBITDA, a decrease of $1,408 in Television Group segment EBITDA, and increase in Corporate expenses of approximately $1,729 and a decrease in other income (expense) net, related to a one-time gain of $7,536 in miscellaneous income related to a payment associated with a change-in-control provision in one of Belo’s vendor contracts, partially offset by the receipt in 2007, of a $4,000 insurance settlement related to losses suffered from Hurricane Katrina.

Television Group

The following discussion reviews segment results for the Company’s Television Group, which currently consists of 20 owned stations and one station operated through an LMA, plus four wholly-owned cable news channels. The Television Group’s operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, as compared with the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, were as follows:

		Three months ended June 30,												Six months ended June 30,
						Percentage												Percentage
		2007				Change				2006				2007				Change				2006
Net operating revenues		$	198,229				2.5	%		$	193,326			$	376,571				2.3	%		$	368,018
Segment costs and expenses			115,954				5.6	%			109,815				227,821				4.6	%			217,860
Segment EBITDA(a)		$	82,275				(1.5	%)		$	83,511			$	148,750				(0.9	%)		$	150,158

Net Operating Revenues

Television Group revenues increased 2.5 percent and 2.3 percent for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, over the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, respectively. The table below presents the components of net operating revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, as compared with the three and six months ended June 30, 2006:

		Three months ended June 30,												Six months ended June 30,
						Percentage												Percentage
		2007				Change				2006				2007				Change				2006
Non-political advertising		$	183,481				4.4	%		$	175,681			$	349,290				3.5	%		$	337,463
Political advertising			2,199				(56.8	%)			5,094				2,974				(62.4	%)			7,913
Other			12,549				—	%			12,551				24,307				7.4	%			22,642
Net operating revenues		$	198,229				2.5	%		$	193,326			$	376,571				2.3	%		$	368,018

Non-political advertising revenues increased $7,800, or 4.4 percent, in the second quarter 2007 as compared to the second quarter 2006. This increase is a combination of a $4,855, or 2.9 percent, increase in local and national spot revenue and a $2,246, or 47.6 percent, increase in advertising revenue generated from the Television Group’s Web sites as compared with the second quarter 2006. Spot revenue increases in the home improvement, radio and television, telecommunications and restaurant categories were partially offset by decreases in the automotive and department store categories. The spot revenue increases were partially offset by a decrease in political advertising revenues. Political advertising revenues decreased $2,895, or 56.8 percent, in the second quarter 2007 as compared with the second quarter 2006. Political revenues are generally higher in even numbered years than in odd numbered years due to elections for various state and national offices.

Non-political advertising revenues increased $11,827, or 3.5 percent, in the six months ended June 30, 2007 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2006. This increase is a combination of a $7,190, or 2.2 percent, increase in local and national spot revenue and a $3,469, or 39.7 percent, increase in advertising revenue generated from the Television Group’s Web sites as compared with the six months ended June 30, 2006. Spot revenue increases in the home improvement, restaurant, telecommunications, radio and television and financial services categories were partially offset by decreases in the automotive, department store and healthcare categories. The spot revenue increases were partially offset by a decrease in political advertising revenues. Political advertising revenues decreased $4,939, or 62.4 percent, in the six months ended June 30, 2007 as compared with the six months ended June 30, 2006. Political revenues are generally higher in even numbered years than in odd numbered years due to elections for various state and national offices. Other revenues increased primarily due to rate increases in retransmission fees.

Segment Costs and Expenses

Television Group segment costs and expenses increased $6,139, or 5.6 percent, in the second quarter 2007 compared to the year-earlier period, primarily due to increases in outside services and salaries, wages and employee benefits. The increase in outside services is primarily due to incremental costs associated with technology outsourcing announced in the second quarter 2006. The increase in salaries, wages and employee benefit expenses is primarily due to increased headcount. Segment EBITDA for the Television Group decreased $1,236, or 1.5 percent, in the second quarter 2007 compared to the prior year period primarily as a result of the increase in expenses.

Television Group segment costs and expenses increased $9,961, or 4.6 percent, in the six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to the year-earlier period, primarily due to increases in outside services, salaries, wages and employee benefits and programming expense. The increase in outside services is primarily due to incremental costs associated with the technology outsourcing announced in the second quarter 2006. The increase in salaries, wages and employee benefit expenses is primarily due to increased headcount. The increase in programming expense is primarily due to increased rates for syndicated programming. Segment EBITDA for the Television Group decreased $1,408, or 0.9 percent, in the six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to the prior year period primarily as a result of the increase in expenses.

Newspaper Group

The following discussion reviews segment results for the Company’s Newspaper Group, which consists of four daily newspapers, various niche publications and commercial printing. Discussion of the three major newspapers generally includes the operations of the related niche publications and products within their respective markets. The Newspaper Group’s operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, as compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, were as follows:

		Three months ended June 30,												Six months ended June 30,
						Percentage												Percentage
		2007				Change				2006				2007				Change				2006
Net operating revenues		$	192,276				(8.5	%)		$	210,231			$	367,989				(9.6	%)		$	407,262
Segment costs and expenses			149,734				(9.2	%)			164,992				300,781				(10.1	%)			334,447
Segment EBITDA(a)		$	42,542				(6.0	%)		$	45,239			$	67,208				(7.7	%)		$	72,815

Net Operating Revenues

Newspaper Group revenues decreased 8.5 percent and 9.6 percent in the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, respectively, as compared with the three and six months ended June 30, 2006. The table below presents the components of Newspaper Group net operating revenues for those periods:

		Three months ended June 30,												Six months ended June 30,
						Percentage												Percentage
		2007				Change				2006				2007				Change				2006
Advertising		$	157,704				(9.6	%)		$	174,415			$	299,649				(10.6	%)		$	335,176
Circulation			27,893				(2.9	%)			28,737				55,511				(4.2	%)			57,921
Other			6,679				(5.7	%)			7,079				12,829				(9.4	%)			14,165
Net operating revenues		$	192,276				(8.5	%)		$	210,231			$	367,989				(9.6	%)		$	407,262

Advertising revenues accounted for approximately 82 percent and 81 percent of total Newspaper Group revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, respectively, compared to approximately 82 percent for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006. Circulation revenue accounted for approximately 15 percent of total Newspaper Group revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, respectively, compared to approximately 14 percent for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006. For each of the periods, commercial printing made up most of the remainder of Newspaper Group revenues.

Net operating revenues for The Dallas Morning News decreased $8,455, or 6.6 percent, in the three months ended June 30, 2007, as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2006. Advertising revenues decreased by $8,089, or 7.7 percent, in the three months ended June 30, 2007, when compared to the three months ended June 30, 2006. General advertising revenues decreased $3,945, or 23.7 percent, in the three months ended June 30, 2007, as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2006, primarily due to decreases in the financial and automotive categories. Retail advertising revenue decreased $1,501, or 6.9 percent, in the three months ended June 30, 2007, compared to the three months ended June 30, 2006, primarily due to a decrease in the furniture category. Classified advertising revenues decreased $1,279, or 3.7 percent, primarily due to decreases in the automotive and real estate categories. Circulation revenue was relatively flat for the three months ended June 30, 2007, compared to the three months ended June 30, 2006.

Net operating revenues for The Dallas Morning News decreased by $20,336, or 8.2 percent, in the six months ended June 30, 2007, as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2006. Advertising revenues decreased by $19,100, or 9.5 percent, in the six months ended June 30, 2007, when compared to the six months ended June 30, 2006. General advertising revenues decreased $8,814, or 27.5 percent, in the six months ended June 30, 2007, as

compared to the six months ended June 30, 2006, primarily due to decreases in the financial, telecommunications and automotive categories. Retail advertising revenue decreased $2,275, or 5.5 percent, in the six months ended June 30, 2007, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2006, primarily due to a decrease in the furniture category. Classified advertising revenues decreased $6,764, or 9.8 percent, primarily due to decreases in the real estate, automotive and employment categories. Circulation revenue decreased $866, or 2.5 percent, in the six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2006.

Net operating revenues for The Providence Journal decreased by $2,881, or 6.9 percent, in the three months ended June 30, 2007, as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2006. Advertising revenues decreased $2,457, or 7.1 percent, in the three months ended June 30, 2007, compared to the three months ended June 30, 2006. Retail advertising revenues decreased $776, or 7.1 percent, due to decreases in the department store, gaming, furniture and home accessories and amusements categories. General advertising revenues decreased $286, or 39.5 percent, in the three months ended June 30, 2007, compared to the three months ended June 30, 2006, primarily due to decreases in the automotive category. Classified advertising revenue decreased $1,039, or 8.1 percent, in the three months ended June 30, 2007, compared to the three months ended June 30, 2006, primarily due to decreases in the employment and real estate categories. Circulation revenue decreased $403, or 6.0 percent, in the three months ended June 30, 2007, compared to the three months ended June 30, 2006, primarily due to lower overall circulation.

Net operating revenues for The Providence Journal decreased by $6,369, or 7.9 percent, in the six months ended June 30, 2007, as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2006. Advertising revenues decreased $5,098, or 7.7 percent for the six months ended June 30, 2007, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2006. Classified advertising revenue decreased $2,013, or 8.0 percent, in the six months ended June 30, 2007, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2006, primarily due to decreases in the employment and real estate categories. Retail advertising revenues decreased $1,689, or 7.9 percent, due to decreases in the department store, gaming, furniture and home accessories and amusements categories for the six months ended June 30, 2007, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2006. General advertising revenues decreased $680, or 42.2 percent, for the six months ended June 30, 2007, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2006, primarily due to decreases in the automotive category. Circulation revenue declined $1,192, or 8.9 percent, in the six months ended June 30, 2007, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2006, primarily due to lower overall circulation.

Net operating revenues for The Press-Enterprise decreased by $6,619, or 16.1 percent, in the three months ended June 30, 2007, as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2006. Total advertising revenues decreased $6,166, or 17.6 percent, in the three months ended June 30, 2007, compared with the three months ended June 30, 2006. Retail advertising revenues decreased $1,295, or 23.8 percent, primarily due to decreases in department store, home improvement, home furnishings and grocery categories. General advertising revenues decreased $541, or 16.9 percent, due to decreases in financial and automotive categories. Classified advertising revenues decreased $3,595, or 21.7 percent, primarily due to decreases in the employment, real estate and automotive categories. Circulation revenue at The Press-Enterprise decreased $208, or 4.4 percent, when comparing the three months ended June 30, 2007, to the three months ended June 30, 2006. Commercial printing and other revenue at The Press-Enterprise declined $245, or 17.1 percent, for the three months ended June 30, 2007, compared to the three months ended June 30, 2006.

Net operating revenues for The Press-Enterprise decreased $12,568 or 15.7 percent, in the six months ended June 30, 2007, as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2006. Total advertising revenues decreased $11,330, or 16.8 percent, in the six months ended June 30, 2007, compared with the six months ended June 30, 2006. Classified advertising revenues decreased $6,971, or 21.3 percent, primarily due to decreases in the employment, real estate and automotive categories. Retail advertising revenues decreased $1,996, or 19.9 percent, primarily due to decreases in the department store, home improvement, home furnishings and grocery categories. General advertising revenues decreased $774, or 13.2 percent, in the six months ended June 30, 2007, when compared with the six months ended June 30, 2006, primarily due to decreases in the financial and automotive categories. Circulation revenue at The Press-Enterprise decreased $352, or 3.7 percent, when comparing the six months ended June 30, 2007, to the six months ended June 30, 2006. Commercial printing and other revenue at The Press-Enterprise declined $886, or 29.3 percent, for the six months ended June 30, 2007, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2006.

Segment Costs and Expenses

Newspaper Group segment costs and expenses decreased $15,258, or 9.2 percent, in the three months ended June 30, 2007, as compared to the prior year period primarily due to decreases in newsprint, ink and other supplies,

salaries, wages and employee benefits, and other production, distribution and operating costs. Newsprint, ink and other supplies decreased $7,927, or 23.4 percent, primarily due to lower newsprint costs which is a combination of lower prices and lower volume, due in part to the Company’s strategic decisions to reduce third party circulation for its publications and to reduce the geographic distribution area for The Dallas Morning News. Salaries, wages and employee benefits decreased $4,741, or 6.6 percent, primarily due to the voluntary severance program for newsroom employees at The Dallas Morning News initiated in the third quarter 2006 which reduced headcount. In addition to the voluntary severance program, the Newspaper Group recognized a reduction in estimated pension expense of approximately $1,251 primarily due to the Company’s curtailment of its defined benefit pension plan effective March 31, 2007, and an increase in the discount rate applied to future pension obligations. Other production, distribution and operating costs decreased $2,590, or 4.3 percent, primarily due to decreases in distribution and advertising and promotion partially offset by an increase in outside services. The decrease in distribution expense is primarily due to the Company’s decision to reduce third party circulation at The Dallas Morning News. The decrease in advertising and promotion is primarily due to decreases at The Dallas Morning News. These decreases were partially offset by an increase in outside services due to incremental costs associated with the technology outsourcing announced in the second quarter 2006. As a result of the items discussed above, segment EBITDA for the Newspaper Group decreased $2,697, or 6.0 percent, for the three months ended June 30, 2007 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2006.

Newspaper Group segment costs and expenses decreased $33,666, or 10.1 percent, in the six months ended June 30, 2007, as compared to the prior year period primarily due to decreases in newsprint, ink and other supplies, salaries, wages and employee benefits, and other production, distribution and operating costs. Newsprint, ink and other supplies decreased $17,725, or 25.2 percent, primarily due to lower newsprint costs which is a combination of lower prices and lower volume due in part to the Company’s strategic decisions to reduce third party circulation for its publications and to reduce the geographic distribution area for The Dallas Morning News. Salaries, wages and employee benefits decreased $12,615, or 8.6 percent, primarily due to the voluntary severance program for newsroom employees at The Dallas Morning News initiated in the third quarter 2006. In addition to the voluntary severance program, the Newspaper Group recognized a reduction in estimated pension expense of approximately $3,083 primarily due to the Company’s curtailment of its defined benefit pension plan effective March 31, 2007, and an increase in the discount rate applied to future pension obligations. Other production, distribution and operating costs decreased $3,326, or 2.8 percent, primarily due to decreases in distribution and advertising and promotion partially offset by an increase in outside services. The decrease in distribution expense is primarily due to the Company’s decision to reduce third party circulation at The Dallas Morning News. The decrease in advertising and promotion is primarily due to decreases at The Dallas Morning News. These decreases were partially offset by an increase in outside services due to incremental costs associated with the technology outsourcing announced in the second quarter 2006. As a result of the items discussed above, segment EBITDA for the Newspaper Group decreased $5,607 or 7.7 percent, for the six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2006.

Corporate

Corporate costs and expenses decreased $554, or 2.2 percent, in the three months ended June 30, 2007, compared to the three months ended June 30, 2006, primarily due to a decrease in outside services of $2,918 for consulting fees related to the technology initiatives. Belo expects consulting costs to continue throughout 2007 at a level consistent with the first six months of 2007. This decrease was partially offset by a charitable contribution of $2,450 attributable to the donation of a tract of land to benefit the City of Dallas, Texas.

Corporate costs and expenses increased $1,729, or 3.9 percent, in the six months ended June 30, 2007, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2006, primarily due to a charitable contribution of $2,450 attributable to the donation of a tract of land to benefit the City of Dallas, Texas.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Operating Cash Flows

Net cash provided by operations, bank borrowings and term debt are Belo’s primary sources of liquidity. Net cash provided by operations was $79,291 in the six months ended June 30, 2007 compared with $92,365 in the six months ended June 30, 2006. The changes in cash flows from operations were primarily caused by routine changes in our working capital requirements, including a $17,600 federal tax extension payment the Company made in the

first quarter 2007. The Company used net cash provided by operations and proceeds from stock option exercises to fund capital expenditures, make dividend payments and purchase treasury shares.

The Company believes its current financial condition and credit relationships are adequate to fund its current obligations.

Investing Cash Flows

Net cash flows used for investing activities were $33,360 in the six months ended June 30, 2007 compared with $32,445 in the six months ended June 30, 2006. These cash flows are primarily attributable to capital expenditures and investments as more fully described below.

Capital Expenditures

Total capital expenditures were $29,736 in the six months ended June 30, 2007 compared with $34,073 in the six months ended June 30, 2006. These were primarily for Television Group and Newspaper Group facilities and equipment and the building projects mentioned below.

In the first quarter 2007, the Company took possession of the new distribution and production center for The Dallas Morning News in southern Dallas. The total cost of the land, land improvements, buildings and equipment is projected to be approximately $50,000. Of the total estimated costs, approximately $47,959 has been incurred since the beginning of the project and approximately $2,658 and $4,411 has been incurred in the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, respectively.

In the first quarter 2007, The Press-Enterprise moved into its new 150,000 square foot, five-story office building to centralize all news, editorial, advertising, sales and marketing, technology, production support and administrative functions. The total cost of the project is projected to be approximately $40,000. Of the total estimated costs, approximately $34,831 has been incurred since the beginning of the project and approximately $2,465 and $7,748 has been incurred in the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, respectively.

Acquisition

On February 26, 2007, the Company purchased the assets of WUPL-TV, the My Network TV affiliate, in New Orleans, Louisiana.

Financing Cash Flows

Net cash flows used for financing activities were $65,678 in the six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to $15,170 in the six months ended June 30, 2006. The 2007 cash flows used are primarily attributable to dividends on common stock and to a lesser extent than prior years, repurchase of treasury stock as more fully described below. The 2006 cash flows are primarily attributable to borrowings and repayments under the Company’s revolving credit facility, dividends on common stock, proceeds from exercises of stock options and purchases of treasury stock.

Long-Term Debt

At June 30, 2007, Belo had $1,049,022 in fixed-rate debt securities as follows: $350,000 of 8% Senior Notes due 2008; $249,022 of 6-3/4% Senior Notes due 2013, $200,000 of 7-3/4% Senior Debentures due 2027; and $250,000 of 7-1/4% Senior Debentures due 2027. The weighted average effective interest rate for the fixed-rate debt instruments is 7.5 percent. On June 1, 2007, the Company repaid the remaining outstanding balance of the 7-1/8% Senior Notes of $234,477 at their maturity using available cash balances and borrowings under the Company’s variable-rate revolving credit facility and its uncommitted lines of credit.

At June 30, 2007, the Company had a $1,000,000 variable-rate revolving credit facility under which borrowings were $185,000. The Company is required to maintain certain ratios as of the end of each quarter, as defined in its revolving credit agreement. As of June 30, 2007, the Company was in compliance with all debt covenant requirements. These borrowings may be converted at the Company’s option to revolving debt. Accordingly, such borrowings are classified as long-term debt in the Company’s financial statements. The weighted average effective

annual interest rate for this credit facility, which includes a .125 percent commitment fee, is 5.9 percent as of June 30, 2007.

In addition, the Company has uncommitted lines of credit of $60,000, of which $13,960 was outstanding at June 30, 2007. The uncommitted lines of credit have variable interest rates. These borrowings may be converted at the Company’s option to revolving debt. Accordingly, such borrowings are classified as long-term debt in the Company’s financial statements. As of June 30, 2007, the weighted average effective annual interest rate for borrowings under the lines of credit was 5.9 percent. All unused borrowings under the Company’s revolving credit facility and the uncommitted lines of credit were available for borrowing as of June 30, 2007.

Dividends

On June 1, 2007, the Company paid first quarter 2007 dividends of $12,778, or 12.5 cents per share, on Series A and Series B common stock outstanding, to shareholders of record on May 11, 2007. On March 2, 2007, the Company paid fourth quarter 2006 dividends of $12,787, or 12.5 cents per share, on Series A and Series B common stock outstanding, to shareholders of record on February 9, 2007.

On July 27, 2007, the Company declared second quarter 2007 dividends of 12.5 cents per share, on Series A and Series B common stock outstanding, to be paid on September 7, 2007 to shareholders of record on August 17, 2007.

Share Repurchase Program

In the second quarter 2007, the Company purchased 629,339 shares of its Series A common stock under a stock repurchase program pursuant to authorization from Belo’s Board of Directors in December 2005. The remaining authorization for the repurchase of shares as of June 30, 2007 under this authority was 13,221,716 shares. In addition, the Company has a stock repurchase program authorizing the purchase of up to $2,500 of common stock annually. During the second quarter 2007, no shares were repurchased under this program. There is no expiration date for these repurchase programs. The total cost of the treasury shares purchased in the second quarter 2007 was $13,507. All shares repurchased in the second quarter 2007 were retired as of June 30, 2007.

Other

The Company has various sources available to meet its 2007 capital and operating commitments, including cash on hand, short-term investments, internally-generated funds and a $1,000,000 revolving line of credit. The Company believes its resources are adequate to meet its needs.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

On January 1, 2007, the Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation (FIN) 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes.” FIN 48, an interpretation of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes,” clarifies the accounting and disclosure requirements for uncertainty in tax positions as defined by the standard. In connection with the adoption of FIN 48, the Company has analyzed its filing positions in all significant jurisdictions where it is required to file income tax returns for the open tax years in such jurisdictions. The Company has identified as major tax jurisdictions, as defined, its federal income tax return and its state income tax returns in five states. The Company’s federal income tax returns for the years subsequent to December 31, 2002, remain subject to examination. The Company’s income tax returns in major state income tax jurisdictions remain subject to examination for various periods subsequent to December 31, 2001. The Company currently believes that all significant filing positions are highly certain and that, more likely than not, all of its significant income tax filing positions and deductions would be sustained. Therefore, the Company has no significant reserves for uncertain tax positions and no adjustments to such reserves were required upon the adoption of FIN 48. If interest and penalties are assessed, interest costs will be recognized in interest expense and penalties will be recognized in operating expenses.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 157, “Fair Value Measurements.” SFAS 157 establishes, among other items, a framework for fair value measurements in the financial statements by providing a single definition of fair value, provides guidance on the methods used to estimate fair value and increases disclosures about estimates of fair value. The effective date of SFAS 157 for the Company is January 1, 2008. The Company is evaluating the effect of the adoption of this standard.

Forward-Looking Statements

Statements in this Form 10-Q concerning Belo’s business outlook or future economic performance, anticipated profitability, revenues, expenses, dividends, capital expenditures, investments, future financings or other financial and non-financial items that are not historical facts, are “forward-looking statements” as the term is defined under applicable federal securities laws. Forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those statements.

Such risks, uncertainties and factors include, but are not limited to, changes in capital market conditions and prospects, and other factors such as changes in advertising demand, interest rates and newsprint prices; newspaper circulation matters, including changes in readership, and audits and related actions by the Audit Bureau of Circulations; technological changes, including the transition to digital television and the development of new systems to distribute television and other audio-visual content; development of Internet commerce; industry cycles; changes in pricing or other actions by competitors and suppliers; regulatory changes; adoption of new accounting standards or changes in existing accounting standards by the Financial Accounting Standards Board or other accounting standard-setting bodies or authorities; the effects of Company acquisitions and dispositions; the recovery of the New Orleans market, where the Company owns and operates market-leading television station WWL-TV and recently acquired WUPL-TV, from the effects of Hurricane Katrina; general economic conditions; and significant armed conflict, as well as other risks detailed in Belo’s other public disclosures, and filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), including the Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Other than as disclosed, there have been no material changes in the Company’s exposure to market risk from the disclosure included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

During the quarter ended June 30, 2007, there were no changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, Belo’s internal controls over financial reporting.

The Company carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer and executive vice president/Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer and executive vice president/Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective such that information relating to the Company (including its consolidated subsidiaries) required to be disclosed in the Company’s SEC reports (i) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC rules and forms and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer and executive vice president/Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

PART II

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

In addition to the proceedings disclosed below and those previously disclosed (see Note 9 to the Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1), a number of other legal proceedings are pending against the Company, including several actions for alleged libel and/or defamation. In the opinion of management, liabilities, if any, arising from these other legal proceedings would not have a material adverse effect on the results of operations, liquidity or financial position of the Company.

On August 23, 2004, August 26, 2004 and October 5, 2004, respectively, three related lawsuits were filed by purported shareholders of the Company in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas against the Company, Robert W. Decherd and Barry Peckham. The complaints arise out of the circulation overstatement at The Dallas Morning News announced by the Company in 2004, alleging that the overstatement

artificially inflated Belo’s financial results and thereby injured investors. The plaintiffs seek to represent a purported class of shareholders who purchased Belo common stock between May 12, 2003 and August 6, 2004. The complaints allege violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. On October 18, 2004, the court ordered the consolidation of all cases arising out of the same facts and presenting the same claims, and on February 7, 2005, plaintiffs filed an amended, consolidated complaint adding as defendants John L. Sander, Dunia A. Shive, Dennis A. Williamson and James M. Moroney III. On May 18, 2007, the court partially granted defendants’ motions to dismiss plaintiffs’ second amended complaint to the extent it dismissed plaintiffs’ complaint as to defendants John L. Sander, Dunia A. Shive and Dennis A. Williamson. The motions to dismiss were denied as to the other defendants. No class or classes have been certified and no amount of damages has been specified. The Company believes the complaints are without merit and intends to vigorously defend against them.

On June 3, 2005, a shareholder derivative lawsuit was filed by a purported individual shareholder of the Company in the 191^st Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas, against Robert W. Decherd, Dennis A. Williamson, Dunia A. Shive and John L. Sander, all of whom are current or retired executive officers of the Company; James M. Moroney III, an executive officer of The Dallas Morning News; Barry Peckham, a former executive officer of The Dallas Morning News; and Louis E. Caldera, Judith L. Craven, Stephen Hamblett, Dealey D. Herndon, Wayne R. Sanders, France A. Córdova, Laurence E. Hirsch, J. McDonald Williams, Henry P. Becton, Jr., Roger A. Enrico, William T. Solomon, Lloyd D. Ward, M. Anne Szostak and Arturo Madrid, current or former directors of the Company. The lawsuit makes various claims asserting mismanagement and breach of fiduciary duty related to the circulation overstatement at The Dallas Morning News. On May 30, 2007, after a prior discovery stay ended, the court issued an order administratively closing the case. Under the court’s order, the case is stayed and, as a result, no further action can be taken in the proceeding unless the case is reinstated. The court retained jurisdiction and the case is subject to being reinstated by the court or upon motion by any party. The court’s order was not a dismissal with prejudice.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

There have been no material changes in the Company’s risk factors from the disclosure included in the Annual Report of Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

There have been no unregistered sales of equity securities in the last three years. All repurchases of securities detailed below were retired in the quarter they were repurchased.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

The following table provides information about the Company’s Series A common stock repurchases during the quarter ended June 30, 2007. The Company did not repurchase any shares of Series B common stock during the quarter ended June 30, 2007.

														(d)
										(c)				Maximum Number of
										Total Number of				Shares that May Yet
										Shares Purchased as				be Purchased Under
		(a)				(b)				Part of Publicly				the Plans or
		Total Number of				Average Price Paid				Announced Plans or				Programs (1)
Period		Shares Purchased				per Share				Programs
April 1, 2007 through April 30, 2007			—			$	—								13,851,055
May 1, 2007 through May 31, 2007			258,339				20.36				258,339				13,592,716
June 1, 2007 through June 30, 2007			371,000				22.18				371,000				13,221,716
Total			629,339			$	21.44				629,339				13,221,716

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

The Annual Meeting of the Company’s shareholders was held on May 8, 2007. All nominees standing for election as directors were elected. The following chart indicates the number of votes cast with respect to each nominee for director:

						Withheld
Nominee		For				Authority
Louis E. Caldera			210,286,054				3,025,106
Judith L. Craven, M.D., M.P.H.			209,585,777				3,725,383
Dealey D. Herndon			208,758,817				4,552,343
Wayne R. Sanders			210,344,684				2,966,476

In addition to those directors elected at the Annual Meeting, the following directors continue in office: Henry P. Becton, France A. Córdova, Ph.D., Robert W. Decherd, Laurence E. Hirsch, William T. Solomon, M. Anne Szostak, Lloyd D. Ward and J. McDonald Williams.

At the Annual Meeting, a proposal to approve the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as Belo’s independent registered public accounting firm (Proposal II) was approved by the Company’s shareholders. The following chart indicates the number of votes cast for and against and the number of abstentions with respect to this proposal. There were no broker nonvotes.

		For				Against				Abstain
Proposal II			211,902,236				1,136,059				272,865

At the Annual Meeting, a proposal to elect all directors annually and not by classes was not approved by the Company’s shareholders (Proposal III). The following chart indicates the number of votes cast for and against and the number of abstentions and broker nonvotes with respect to this proposal.

		For				Against				Abstain				Broker Nonvotes
Proposal III			56,489,971				145,220,214				2,784,937				8,816,038

No other matters were submitted to a vote of security holders at the Annual Meeting.

Item 5. Other Information

On April 26, 2007, the Company announced its consolidated financial results for the quarter ending March 31, 2007. The press release was widely disseminated and also posted immediately to the Company’s website; however, it was not previously furnished under cover of a Form 8-K. A copy of the press release is furnished herewith as Exhibit 99.1.

In July 2007 the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) renewed the FCC licenses of stations KENS, KING, KMOV, KMSB, KONG, KREM, KTTU, KTVB, KTVK, KVUE, WCNC, WHAS, and WWL. Applications for renewal of the FCC licenses of stations KGW, KHOU, KSKN and WFAA are pending. Under FCC rules, a license expiration date is automatically extended pending review and grant of the renewal application.

Item 6. Exhibits

Exhibits marked with an asterisk (*) are incorporated by reference to documents previously filed by the Company with the SEC, as indicated. All other documents are filed with this report. Exhibits marked with a tilde (~) are management contracts, compensatory plan contracts or arrangements filed pursuant to Item 601(b)(10)(iii)(A) of Regulation S-K.

Exhibit
Number		Description
3.1 *		Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K dated March 15, 2000 (Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 001-08598) (the “1999 Form 10-K”))
3.2 *		Certificate of Correction to Certificate of Incorporation dated May 13, 1987 (Exhibit 3.2 to the 1999 Form 10-K)
3.3 *		Certificate of Designation of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock of the Company dated April 16, 1987 (Exhibit 3.3 to the 1999 Form 10-K)
3.4 *		Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation of the Company dated May 4, 1988 (Exhibit 3.4 to the 1999 Form 10-K)
3.5 *		Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation of the Company dated May 3, 1995 (Exhibit 3.5 to the 1999 Form 10-K)
3.6 *		Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation of the Company dated May 13, 1998 (Exhibit 3.6 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1998 (Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 002-74702)(the “2nd Quarter 1998 Form 10-Q”))
3.7 *		Certificate of Ownership and Merger, dated December 20, 2000, but effective as of 11:59 p.m. on December 31, 2000 (Exhibit 99.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 29, 2000 (Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 001-08598))
3.8 *		Amended Certificate of Designation of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock of the Company dated May 4, 1988 (Exhibit 3.7 to the 1999 Form 10-K)
3.9 *		Certificate of Designation of Series B Common Stock of the Company dated May 4, 1988 (Exhibit 3.8 to the 1999 Form 10-K)
3.10 *		Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company, effective December 31, 2000 (Exhibit 3.10 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K dated March 13, 2001 (Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 001-08598)(the “2000 Form 10-K”))
3.11 *		Amendment No. 1 to Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company, effective February 7, 2003 (Exhibit 3.11 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K dated March 12, 2003 (Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 001-08598)(the “2002 Form 10-K”))
3.12 *		Amendment No. 2 to Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company, effective May 9, 2005 (Exhibit 3.12 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 (Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 001-08598))
3.13 *		Amendment No. 3 to Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company, effective July 27, 2007 (Exhibit 99.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 30, 2007 (Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 001-08598)

Exhibit
Number		Description
4.1		Certain rights of the holders of the Company’s Common Stock are set forth in Exhibits 3.1-3.12 above
4.2     *		Specimen Form of Certificate representing shares of the Company’s Series A Common Stock (Exhibit 4.2 to the 2000 Form 10-K)
4.3     *		Specimen Form of Certificate representing shares of the Company’s Series B Common Stock (Exhibit 4.3 to the 2000 Form 10-K)
4.4		Instruments defining rights of debt securities:

		(1)     *		Indenture dated as of June 1, 1997 between the Company and The Chase Manhattan Bank, as Trustee (the “Indenture”)(Exhibit 4.6(1) to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1997 (Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 002-74702)(the “2nd Quarter 1997 Form 10-Q”))
		(2)     *		(a)      $200 million 7-1/8% Senior Note due 2007 (Exhibit 4.6(3)(a) to the 2nd Quarter 1997 Form 10-Q)
		*		(b)      $100 million 7-1/8% Senior Note due 2007 (Exhibit 4.6(3)(b) to the 2nd Quarter 1997 Form 10-Q)
		(3)     *		$200 million 7-3/4% Senior Debenture due 2027 (Exhibit 4.6(4) to the 2nd Quarter 1997 Form 10-Q)
		(4)     *		Officers’ Certificate dated June 13, 1997 establishing terms of debt securities pursuant to Section 3.1 of the Indenture (Exhibit 4.6(5) to the 2nd Quarter 1997 Form 10-Q)
		(5)     *		(a)      $200 million 7-1/4% Senior Debenture due 2027 (Exhibit 4.6(6)(a) to the Company’s Quarterly Report on            Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1997 (Securities and Exchange Commission            File No. 002-74702)(the “3rd Quarter 1997 Form 10-Q”))
		*		(b)      $50 million 7-1/4% Senior Debenture due 2027 (Exhibit 4.6(6)(b) to the 3rd Quarter 1997 Form 10-Q)
		(6)     *		Officers’ Certificate dated September 26, 1997 establishing terms of debt securities pursuant to Section 3.1 of the Indenture (Exhibit 4.6(7) to the 3rd Quarter 1997 Form 10-Q)
		(7)     *		$350 million 8.00% Senior Note due 2008 (Exhibit 4.7(8) to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2001 (Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 001-08598)(the “3rd Quarter 2001 Form 10-Q”))
		(8)     *		Officers’ Certificate dated November 1, 2001 establishing terms of debt securities pursuant to Section 3.1 of the Indenture (Exhibit 4.7(9) to the 3rd Quarter 2001 Form 10-Q)
		(9)     *		Form of Belo Corp. 6-3/4% Senior Notes due 2013 (Exhibit 4.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 26, 2006 (Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 001-08598)(the “May 26, 2006 Form 8-K”))
		(10)     *		Officers’ Certificate dated May 26, 2006 establishing terms of debt securities pursuant to Section 3.1 of the Indenture (Exhibit 4.2 to the May 26, 2006 Form 8-K)
		(11)     *		Underwriting Agreement Standard Provisions (Debt Securities), dated May 24, 2006 (Exhibit 1.1 to the May 26, 2006 Form 8-K)
		(12)     *		Underwriting Agreement, dated May 24, 2006, between the Company, Banc of America Securities LLC and JPMorgan Securities, Inc. (Exhibit 1.2 to the May 26, 2006 Form 8-K)

10.1

Financing agreements:

		(1)     *		Amended and Restated Five-Year Competitive Advance and Revolving Credit Facility Agreement dated as of June 7, 2006 among the Company, as Borrower; JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent; J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. and Banc of America Securities LLC, as Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Bookrunners; Bank of America, N.A., as Syndication Agent; and SunTrust Bank, The Bank of New York, and BNP Paribas, as Documentation Agents; and Mizuho Corporate Bank, Ltd., as Co-Documentation Agent (Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 7, 2006 (Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 001-08598))

10.2

Compensatory plans:

			~	(1)				Belo Savings Plan:
						*		(a)		Belo Savings Plan Amended and Restated effective August 1, 2004 (Exhibit 10.2(1)(a) to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 (Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 001-08598)(the “2nd Quarter 2004 Form 10-Q”))
						*		(b)		First Amendment to the Belo Savings Plan (as Amended and Restated effective August 1, 2004), dated March 1, 2005 (Exhibit 10.2(1)(b) to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 (Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 001-08598)(the “1st Quarter 2006 Form 10-Q”))
						*		(c)		Second Amendment to the Belo Savings Plan (as Amended and Restated effective August 1, 2004), dated December 1, 2005 (Exhibit 10.2(1)(c) to the 1st Quarter 2006 Form 10-Q)
						*		(d)		Third Amendment to the Belo Savings Plan (as Amended and Restated effective August 1, 2004), dated September 29, 2006 (Exhibit 10.2(1)(d) to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 (Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 001-08598))
						*		(e)		Fourth Amendment to the Belo Savings Plan (as Amended and Restated effective August 1, 2004), dated November 30, 2006 (Exhibit 10.2(1)(e) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K dated March 1, 2007 (Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 001-08598)(the “2006 Form 10-K”))
								(f)		Fifth Amendment to the Belo Savings Plan (as Amended and Restated effective August 1, 2004), dated May 7, 2007
			~	(2)				Belo 1986 Long-Term Incentive Plan:
						*		(a)		Belo Corp. 1986 Long-Term Incentive Plan (Effective May 3, 1989, as amended by Amendments 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5) (Exhibit 10.3(2) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K dated March 10, 1997 (Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 001-08598))
						*		(b)		Amendment No. 6 to 1986 Long-Term Incentive Plan, dated May 6, 1992 (Exhibit 10.3(2)(b) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K dated March 19, 1998 (Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 002-74702)(the “1997 Form 10-K”))
						*		(c)		Amendment No. 7 to 1986 Long-Term Incentive Plan, dated October 25, 1995 (Exhibit 10.2(2)(c) to the 1999 Form 10-K)
						*		(d)		Amendment No. 8 to 1986 Long-Term Incentive Plan, dated July 21, 1998 (Exhibit 10.3(2)(d) to the 2nd Quarter 1998 Form 10-Q)
			~	(3)		*		Belo 1995 Executive Compensation Plan, as restated to incorporate amendments through December 4, 1997 (Exhibit 10.3(3) to the 1997 Form 10-K)
						*		(a)		Amendment to 1995 Executive Compensation Plan, dated July 21, 1998 (Exhibit 10.2(3)(a) to the 2nd Quarter 1998 Form 10-Q)
						*		(b)		Amendment to 1995 Executive Compensation Plan, dated December 16, 1999 (Exhibit 10.2(3)(b) to the 1999 Form 10-K)
						*		(c)		Amendment to 1995 Executive Compensation Plan, dated December 5, 2003 (Exhibit 10.3(3)(c) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K dated March 4, 2004 (Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 001-08598)(the “2003 Form 10-K”))
						*		(d)		Form of Belo Executive Compensation Plan Award Notification for Employee Awards (Exhibit 10.2(3)(d) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K dated March 6, 2006 (Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 001-08598)(the “2005 Form 10-K”))
			~	(4)		*		Management Security Plan (Exhibit 10.3(1) to the 1996 Form 10-K)
						*		(a)		Amendment to Management Security Plan of Belo Corp. and Affiliated Companies (as Restated Effective January 1, 1982) (Exhibit 10.2(4)(a) to the 1999 Form 10-K)

			~	(5)				Belo Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan
						*		(a)		Belo Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2004 (Exhibit 10.2(5)(a) to the 2003 Form 10-K)
			~	(6)		*		Belo 2000 Executive Compensation Plan (Exhibit 4.15 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 333-43056) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 4, 2000)
						*		(a)		First Amendment to Belo 2000 Executive Compensation Plan effective as of December 31, 2000 (Exhibit 10.2(6)(a) to the 2002 Form 10-K)
						*		(b)		Second Amendment to Belo 2000 Executive Compensation Plan dated December 5, 2002 (Exhibit 10.2(6)(b) to the 2002 Form 10-K)
						*		(c)		Third Amendment to Belo 2000 Executive Compensation Plan dated December 5, 2003 (Exhibit 10.2(6)(c) to the 2003 Form 10-K)
						*		(d)		Form of Belo Executive Compensation Plan Award Notification for Employee Awards (Exhibit 10.2(6)(d) to the 2005 Form 10-K)
			~	(7)		*		Belo 2004 Executive Compensation Plan (Exhibit 10.2(6) to the 2nd Quarter 2004 Form 10-Q)
						*		(a)		Form of Belo 2004 Executive Compensation Plan Award Notification for Executive Time-Based Restricted Stock Unit Awards (Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 2, 2006 (Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 001-008598) (the “March 2, 2006 Form 8-K”))
						*		(b)		Form of Belo 2004 Executive Compensation Plan Award Notification for Employee Awards (Exhibit 10.2 to the March 2, 2006 Form 8-K)
						*		(c)		Form of Award Notification under the Belo 2004 Executive Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Director Awards (Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 12, 2005 (Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 001-08598) (the “December 12, 2005 Form 8-K”))
						*		(d)		First Amendment to the Belo 2004 Executive Compensation Plan, dated November 30, 2006 (Exhibit 10.2(7)(d) to the 2006 Form 10-K)
			~	(8)		*		Summary of Non-Employee Director Compensation (Exhibit 10.3 to the December 12, 2005 Form 8-K)

12		Statements re: Computation of Ratios
31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32		Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
99.1		First Quarter 2007 Earnings Press Release dated April 26, 2007.