e10vk
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
FORM 10-K
|
|
|
(Mark One)
|
|
|
|
x
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007
|
OR
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
Commission File Number:
000-22555
COINSTAR, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
94-3156448
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(IRS Employer
Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
1800 114th Avenue SE, Bellevue, Washington
|
|
98004
|
(Address of principal executive
offices)
|
|
(Zip Code)
|
(425) 943-8000
(Registrants telephone
number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
Common Stock, $0.001 par value
|
|
The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
|
(Title of Each Class)
|
|
(Name of Each Exchange on Which
Registered)
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act.: Yes o No x
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act.: Yes o No x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer
or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
Large accelerated
filer o
|
|
Accelerated
filer x
|
Non-accelerated
filer o (Do
not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Smaller reporting company
o
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act.) Yes o No x
The aggregate market value of the common stock held by
non-affiliates of the registrant, based upon the closing price
of our common stock on June 30, 2007 as reported on the
NASDAQ Global Select Market, was approximately
$488.7 million. Shares of Common Stock held by each
executive officer and director and by each person who
beneficially held more than 5% of the outstanding Common Stock
have been excluded as these persons may be deemed to be
affiliates. This determination of affiliate status in not
necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.
As of February 8, 2008, there were approximately
27,738,062 shares of the registrants Common Stock
outstanding.
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Registrants definitive Proxy Statement for
the 2008 annual meeting of stockholders are incorporated by
reference in Part III of this
Form 10-K.
PART I
Special
Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This Annual Report on
Form 10-K
(Annual Report) contains forward-looking statements.
These statements relate to future events or our future financial
performance. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking
statements by terminology such as anticipate,
believe, continue, could,
estimate, expect, intend,
may, might, plan,
potential, predict, should
or will, or the negative of such terms.
Forward-looking statements are only predictions and involve
known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors,
including the risks outlined under Item 1A, Risk Factors
and elsewhere in this report, that may cause our or our
industrys actual results, performance or achievements to
be materially different from any future results, performance or
achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking
statements. You should not place undue reliance on these
forward-looking statements. Although we believe that the
expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are
reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, performance or
achievements. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or
revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of
new information, future events or otherwise, unless required by
law. Unless the context requires otherwise, the terms
Coinstar, the Company, we,
us and our refer to Coinstar, Inc. and
its subsidiaries.
Summary
We are a multi-national company offering a range of solutions
for retailers storefronts consisting of self-service coin
counting; entertainment services such as skill-crane machines,
bulk vending machines and kiddie rides; and
e-payment
services such as money transfer services, prepaid wireless
products, stored value cards, payroll cards, and prepaid debit
cards. In addition, we offer self-service DVD kiosks where
consumers can rent or purchase movies.
We launched our business in North America with the installation
of the first
Coinstar®
coin-counting machine in the early 1990s and in 2001 we began
offering our coin services in the United Kingdom. Since
inception, our coin-counting machines have counted and processed
more than 345 billion coins worth more than
$18.6 billion in more than 505 million transactions.
As of December 31, 2007, we own and operate more than
15,400 coin-counting machines in the United States, Canada,
Puerto Rico and the United Kingdom, of which approximately
10,700 are
e-payment
enabled, and more than 280,000 entertainment services machines
in the United States, Puerto Rico and Mexico. We also utilize
more than 17,500 point-of-sale terminals for
e-payment
services in the United States and the United Kingdom and offer
our money transfer services at over 30,000 locations.
We are headquartered in Bellevue, Washington, where we maintain
most of our sales, marketing, research and development, quality
control, customer service operations and administration. In
addition, our main entertainment services office is located in
Louisville, Colorado, our main
e-payment
office is located in Chicago, Illinois and our main money
transfer office is located in the London, England. As of
December 31, 2007, we had approximately
1,900 employees. We were incorporated in Delaware on
October 12, 1993.
With our acquisitions and strategic investments over the last
several years, we have significantly broadened our base of
existing and potential retailers and the depth and reach of our
sales and field service forces, providing greater opportunity to
cross-sell our coin, entertainment and
e-payment
services. We have more than 900 field service employees
throughout the United States and internationally, who have
broadened our geographic reach to develop and maintain strong
relationships with retailers. With the combination of coin,
entertainment,
e-payment
services and DVD, we are positioned as a single-source supplier
for retailers to capitalize on the
4th Walltm,
an area between the cash registers and front door of retail
locations that in the past has generally not been managed to
optimize revenue per square foot.
Coin
services
We are the leader in the self-service coin-counting services
market. We own and operate the only multi-national fully
automated network of self-service coin-counting machines across
the United States, Canada, Puerto
3
Rico and in the United Kingdom. We estimate that at any one
time, there is more than $10.5 billion worth of coin
sitting idle in households in the United States. In 2007,
consumers processed more than $2.9 billion worth of coin
through our coin-counting machines.
We own and service all of our coin-counting machines, providing
a turn-key, headache-free service to retailers. Our
machines are easy to use, highly accurate, durable, easy to
service and capable of processing up to 600 coins per minute.
Consumers feed loose change into the machines, which count the
change and then dispense vouchers or, in some cases, issue
stored value cards or
e-certificates,
at the consumers election. Each voucher lists the dollar
value of coins counted, less our transaction fee, which is
typically 8.9% of the value of each transaction. There is no
transaction fee to the consumer when a stored value card or
e-certificate
is issued. Our patented, proprietary technology helps us to
maintain high up-time, remotely monitor performance and minimize
the potential for losses associated with voucher fraud.
Since we pay a percentage of our transaction fees to our
retailers, our coin services benefit our retailers by providing
an additional source of revenue. In addition, studies show that
our coin services increase foot traffic in our retailers
stores and that approximately 46% of our customers spend all or
a part of the proceeds of their vouchers in the store. Our
leading coin services retailers include The Kroger Co. and
Supervalu, Inc. supermarket chains, and our leading stored value
cards or
e-certificate
offerings are Starbucks, Amazon.com and iTunes.
Entertainment
services
We are the leading owner and operator of skill-crane and bulk
vending machines in the United States. We estimate that the
market for our entertainment services is approximately
$1.1 billion annually in the United States.
As with our coin services, we own and service all of our
entertainment services machines, providing a convenient and
trouble-free service to retailers. Our entertainment services
machines consist primarily of skill-crane machines, bulk vending
and kiddie rides, which are installed in more than 27,000 retail
locations, totaling more than 280,000 pieces of equipment as of
December 31, 2007. The majority of our entertainment
services revenue is derived from skill-crane machines that
dispense plush toys, novelties and other items. For each play,
customers maneuver the skill-crane into position and attempt to
retrieve the desired item in the machines enclosed display
area before play is ended. We utilize displays of quality
merchandise, new product introductions and other merchandising
techniques to attract new and repeat customers. Our leading
entertainment services partners include Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
and Kmart, a subsidiary of Sears Holdings Corporation.
Since we pay our retailers a portion of the fee per play, our
entertainment services machines, like our coin-counting
machines, provide an additional revenue stream for our
retailers. In addition, our entertainment services machines add
an element of entertainment for consumers.
E-payment
services
We offer
e-payment
services, including money transfer services, activating and
reloading value on prepaid wireless accounts, selling stored
value cards, loading and reloading prepaid debit cards and
prepaid phone cards, prepaid phones and providing payroll card
services such as balance inquiry and wage statement printing. As
of December 31, 2007, our money transfer services are
provided in over 140 countries. We offer various
e-payment
services through 17,500 point-of-sale terminals, 400 stand-alone
e-payment
kiosks and 10,700
e-payment-enabled
coin-counting machines in supermarkets, drugstores,
universities, shopping malls, convenience stores and other
locations. As with our coin and entertainment services, our
e-payment
services provide an additional revenue stream for our retailers
as we pay a fee through commissions earned on the sales of
e-payment
services. We have relationships with national wireless carriers,
such as Sprint, Verizon,
T-Mobile,
Virgin Mobile and AT&T.
Recent
Events
On January 1, 2008, we exercised our option to acquire a
majority ownership interest in the voting equity of Redbox
Automated Retail, LLC (Redbox) under the terms of
the LLC Interest Purchase Agreement dated November 17,
2005. In conjunction with the option exercise and payment of
$5.1 million, our ownership interest increased from 47.3%
to 51.0%. Since our original investment in Redbox, we have been
accounting for our 47.3%
4
ownership interest under the equity method in our Consolidated
Financial Statements. Effective with the close of this
transaction, January 18, 2008, we will consolidate
Redboxs financial results into our Consolidated Financial
Statements. Along with our acquisition of Video Vending New
York, Inc. (d.b.a. DVDXpress) in October 2007 and
the majority ownership in Redbox, we offer self-service DVD
kiosks where consumers can rent or purchase movies. Our DVD
kiosks supply all the functionality of a traditional video
rental store, yet occupy an area of less than ten square feet.
Consumers use a touch screen to select their DVD, swipe a valid
credit or debit card, and go. The process is designed to be
fast, efficient and fully automated with no upfront or
membership fees. Typically, the DVD rental price is a flat fee
plus tax for one night and if the consumer chooses to keep the
DVD for additional nights, they are automatically charged the
same flat fee price. Our DVD kiosks are available in all states
in the continental United States and Puerto Rico and offer our
consumers with a more convenient home entertainment solution. In
addition, our DVD kiosks provide an additional revenue stream to
our retail partners, who receive a percentage of our fee.
Effective January 1, 2008, we completed the acquisition of
GroupEx Financial Corporation, JRJ Express Inc. and Kimeco, LLC
(collectively, GroupEx), for an aggregate purchase
price of up to $70.0 million. The purchase price included a
$60.0 million cash payment (subject to a customary working
capital adjustment) at closing. Of the $60.0 million paid
at closing, $6.0 million is being held in escrow as partial
security for the indemnification obligations of the sellers
under the agreement until the earlier of (1) the date
eighteen months following the closing and (2) the date
thirty days after completion in calendar year 2009 of the 2008
calendar year audit. An additional $34.0 million of the
$60.0 million paid at closing is being held in escrow as
partial security for the indemnification obligations of the
sellers under the agreement with respect to a lawsuit against
GroupEx and one of the sellers, which will be held until a final
court order or written settlement agreement resolving such
lawsuit has been obtained. In addition, there is a contingent
payment of up to $10.0 million should certain performance
conditions be met in the fifteen months following the closing.
Financial
Information About Segments, Geographic Areas and
Seasonality
The segment and geographic information required herein is
contained in Note 15 to our Consolidated Financial
Statements. A discussion of seasonality is included in
Item 8, along with other quarterly financial information.
Where You
Can Get Information We File with the SEC
We file with, and furnish to, the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC), reports including annual reports
on
Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q,
and current reports on
Form 8-K,
as well as amendments thereto. We maintain a website,
www.coinstar.com, where we make these reports and related
materials available free of charge as soon as reasonably
practicable after we electronically deliver such material to the
SEC. These materials can be found on our website under: About
Us Investor Relations SEC Filings.
You should carefully consider the following risk factors that
may affect our business, including our financial condition and
results of operations. The risks and uncertainties described
below are not the only risks we face. Additional risks and
uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently
deem immaterial also may impair our business. If any of the
following risks actually occur, our business could be harmed,
the trading price of our common stock could decline and you
could lose all or part of your investment in us.
The
termination, non-renewal or renegotiation on materially adverse
terms of our contracts with one or more of our significant
retailers could seriously harm our business, financial condition
and results of operations.
The success of our business depends in large part on our ability
to maintain contractual relationships with our retailers in
profitable locations. Our typical contract term ranges from one
to three years and automatically renews until we or the retailer
gives notice of termination. Certain contract provisions with
our retailers vary, including product and service offerings, the
service fees we are committed to pay each retailer, frequency of
service, and the ability to cancel the contract upon notice
after a certain period of time. We strive to provide direct and
indirect
5
benefits to our retailers that are superior to or competitive
with other providers or systems (including coin-counting systems
which retailers could operate themselves or through a third
party) or alternative uses of the floor space that our machines
occupy. If we are unable to provide our retailers with adequate
benefits, we may be unable to maintain or renew our contractual
relationships on acceptable terms causing our business,
financial condition and results of operations to suffer.
We do a substantial amount of our business with certain
retailers. For example, we have significant relationships with
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and the Kroger Company, which account for
approximately 25% and 12% of our consolidated revenue,
respectively for the year ended December 31, 2007. Our
entertainment services relationship with Wal-Mart is governed by
a contract that Wal-Mart may terminate at any time. Cancellation
or adverse renegotiation of these relationships could seriously
harm our business and reputation.
We may
be unable to identify and define product and service trends or
anticipate, gauge and react to changing consumer demands in a
timely manner.
To be competitive, we need to develop new products and services
that are accepted by the market and establish third-party
relationships necessary to develop and commercialize such
products and services. For example, toy and other products
dispensed in our entertainment services machines must appeal to
a broad range of consumers whose preferences cannot be predicted
with certainty and are subject to change. If we misjudge the
market for our products and services, or if a contract with a
significant retailer is renegotiated, we may be faced with
significant excess inventories for some products, such as toys
and other entertainment products, and missed opportunities for
sales of other products and services. Further, in order to
develop and commercialize new non-entertainment products and
services, including our money transfer business, we will need to
enhance the capabilities of our coin-counting machines and
e-payment
machines and equipment, as well as our related network and
systems through appropriate technological solutions, and
establish market acceptance of such products or services. We
cannot assure you that new products or services that we attempt
to commercialize will be successful.
Our
most extensive business relationship is with Wal-Mart, and
changes to this relationship have had and are expected to
continue to have material effects on our operations and
results.
A significant amount of our resources are committed to our
relationship with Wal-Mart, including investments in machines
and other equipment and managements time. In late 2007 and
early 2008, we and Wal-Mart worked extensively to revise our
business arrangements in connection with Wal-Marts efforts
to reset and optimize its store entrances. As part of these
arrangements and in light of the successful completion of our
coin and DVD tests in hundreds of Wal-Mart locations, we amended
written agreements covering, among other things, the
installation and service of coin-counting machines and DVD
kiosks. Although these arrangements do not provide for a minimum
number of installations, based on our discussions with Wal-Mart,
we expect to install up to 2,700 additional DVD kiosks and up to
2,000 additional coin-counting machines in Wal-Mart stores in
the next 12 to 18 months. As a result, between early 2008
and mid-2009, we are making significant investments, such as
machine and kiosk manufacturing, in line with these
expectations. In addition, as part of this arrangement, we will
remove or relocate a substantial number of its entertainment
machines in Wal-Mart stores.
Although we have had and expect to continue to have a successful
relationship with Wal-Mart, changes to this relationship will
continue to occur both in the long and short-term, some of which
could adversely affect our business. Further, because our formal
arrangements with Wal-Mart are generally for relatively short
periods and do not provide for minimum installation obligations
by Wal-Mart, much of our benefit in this relationship will
depend on the execution of Wal-Marts plan and the
installation of significant numbers of our coin-coin-counting
machines and DVD kiosks.
The
entertainment services market has brought with it risks that
could adversely affect our business, operating results and
financial condition.
In July 2004, we entered the entertainment services business.
This business now represents a significant source of our revenue
and is associated with various financial and operational risks.
However, we may be unable to leverage the comparatively lower
margin entertainment services business with our other lines of
business to produce
6
the cross-selling opportunities we expect. Furthermore, we have
incurred and we may incur adverse accounting charges related to
the entertainment services business. For example, in February
2008, we reached an agreement with Wal-Mart to significantly
expand our coin-counting machines and our DVD kiosk locations
over the next 12 to 18 months and will be removing or
relocating roughly 50% of Wal-Mart cranes, bulk heads and kiddie
rides over the next two quarters. This decision, along with
other contract terminations or decisions to scale-back the
number of entertainment machines with other retail partners as
well as macro-economic trends negatively affecting the
entertainment service industry, resulted in excess equipment and
inventory. As a result, we have recorded a pre-tax charge for
entertainment assets of $65.2 million for the three month
period ended December 31, 2007. For these and other
reasons, the entertainment services business could materially
and adversely affect our business, operating results and
financial condition.
There
are many risks related to our investment in Redbox and our
acquisition of DVDXpress that may prevent us from achieving the
objectives for our entry into the DVD business and negatively
impact our business.
The home video industry is a highly competitive industry with
many distribution channels. We compete in this business through
our investment in Redbox and our acquisition of substantially
all of the assets of DVDXpress, both providers of self-service
DVD kiosks. Some of the risks that could negatively impact our
participation in this industry include:
|
|
|
|
|
Competition from other providers, including those using other
distribution channels, having more experience, better financing,
and better relationships with those in the movie industry, than
we have, including traditional video retailers like Blockbuster,
online retailers like Netflix, other retailers like Wal-Mart,
pay-per-view/cable/satellite
and similar movie content providers like Comcast, and other
forms of movie content providers like computer download sites.
|
|
|
|
Changes in the sequential timing of when movie content is
provided to the various movie content distribution channels; for
example, studios may change, shorten or discontinue altogether
the period they have historically provided between the time
movie content is provided to more traditional video retailers
(usually directly after theatrical release) and to other movie
content providers such as
pay-per-view/cable/satellite
and computer download providers (usually only after a
significant period of time following distribution to the more
traditional video retailers, e.g., one month or longer).
|
|
|
|
Changes in consumer content delivery preferences, including more
use of personal video recorders (e.g., TiVo),
pay-per-view/cable/satellite
and similar technologies, computer downloads, portable devices,
and other mediums, and less demand for a high volume of new
movie content due to such things as larger home DVD and
downloaded movie libraries.
|
|
|
|
Increased availability of movie content inventory through
personal video recorders,
pay-per-view/cable/satellite
and similar technologies, computer downloads, portable devices,
and other mediums.
|
|
|
|
Decreased quality of movie content availability for self-service
DVD distribution.
|
|
|
|
Decreased costs related to purchasing or receipt of movie
content, including less expensive DVDs, including due to piracy,
and cheaper use of
pay-per-view/cable/satellite
and similar technologies.
|
Although we currently own the majority of Redbox and have the
right to appoint three of the five representatives to
Redboxs board of managers, under the Redbox formation
documents, GetAMovie, Inc., a minority owner and subsidiary of
McDonalds Corporation, has the right in some circumstances
to require the sale of Redbox, including Coinstars sale of
its equity. Further, until December 1, 2008, GetAMovie has
the ability to require Coinstar to sell the portion of its
business relating to DVDXpress to Redbox. Accordingly, should
GetAMovie take specific actions, Coinstar could be required to
sell all of its interests in the self-service DVD kiosk
business. In addition, we believe the general success of Redbox
depends to a significant extent on Coinstar and GetAMovie having
a positive working relationship and coordinating in the
development of the Redbox business, including through
McDonalds. Adverse developments relating to any of these
risks as well as others relating to our participation in the
home video industry could significantly affect our business,
financial condition and operating results.
7
Competitive
pressures could seriously harm our business, financial condition
and results of operations.
Our coin-counting services faces competition from supermarkets,
banks and other companies that purchase and operate
coin-counting equipment from companies such as ScanCoin AB,
Cummins-Allison Corporation and others. Our retailers may choose
to replace our coin-counting machines with competitor machines
and operate such machines themselves or through a third party.
In addition, retailers, some of which have significantly more
resources than we do, may decide to enter the coin-counting
market. Some banks and other competitors already provide
coin-counting free of charge or for an amount that yields very
low margins or that may not generate a profit at all. An
expansion of the coin-counting services provided by any of these
competitors could materially and adversely affect our business
and results of operations.
Our entertainment services faces competition from a number of
regional and local operators of entertainment services
equipment. Many of these competitors are engaged in expansion
programs, and we experience intense competition for locations.
Our entertainment services equipment also competes with other
vending machines, coin-operated entertainment devices, and
seasonal and bulk merchandise for sites within retail locations.
We may be unable to maintain current sites in retail locations
or to obtain new sites in the future on attractive terms or at
all. It is possible that a well-financed vending machine
manufacturer or other vending machine operator with existing
relationships with our retailers could compete with us in
certain markets or capture additional market share at our
expense. In addition, retailers could decide to restructure or
otherwise rethink the use of their locations or sites, which
could limit the amount of entertainment services we provide.
Our
e-payment
services, including our money transfer services, prepaid
wireless and long distance accounts, stored value cards, debit
cards and payroll services, face competition from a variety of
types of providers, including, among others, national
distributors of similar cards, other retailers who provide these
services themselves, as well as money transfer companies. Many
of these providers are more established in selling their
e-payment
services than we are and many invest more resources in providing
such services to customers, such as InComm in the prepaid
wireless and long distance markets, Blackhawk Network in the
stored value cards and debit card markets and Western Union in
the money transfer market. In addition, in order for us to
provide many of our
e-payment
services, we depend on relationships with third parties, such as
national wireless carriers, national supermarket chains and
other retailers, money transfer agents and financial
institutions. Accordingly, if we are unable to effectively
market our
e-payment
services or maintain and establish successful relationships with
appropriate third parties, our
e-payment
services will not be competitive.
In addition, the nature and extent of consolidation in markets
where we install our machines and equipment, particularly the
supermarket and other retailing industries, could adversely
affect our operations, including our competitive position, as
the number of our machine and equipment installations could be
significantly reduced.
Litigation,
arbitration, mediation, regulatory actions, investigations or
other legal proceedings could result in material rulings,
decisions, settlements, fines, penalties or publicity that could
adversely affect our business, financial condition and results
of operations.
Our business has in the past been, and may in the future
continue to be, party to class actions, regulatory actions,
investigations, arbitration, mediation and other legal
proceedings. The outcome of such proceedings is often difficult
to assess or quantify. Plaintiffs, regulatory bodies or other
parties may seek very large or indeterminate amounts of money
from us or substantial restrictions on our business activities,
and the results, including the magnitude, of lawsuits, actions,
settlements, decisions and investigations may remain unknown for
substantial periods of time. The cost to defend, settle or
otherwise finalize lawsuits, regulatory actions, investigations,
arbitrations, mediations or other legal proceedings may be
significant and such proceedings may divert managements
time. For example, we have been in dispute with a former
supplier, ScanCoin AB, regarding certain contract rights and
obligations as well as ownership of certain of our patents and
patent applications related to our coin-counting business. We
have incurred and expect to incur significant costs relating to
this dispute, and cannot be sure of when the dispute will be
resolved, and if resolved, the magnitude of the effects the
ultimate resolution will have on our business. In addition,
there may be adverse publicity associated with such developments
that could decrease customer acceptance of our products and
services. As a result, litigation, arbitration, mediation,
regulatory actions
8
or investigations involving us or are affiliates may adversely
affect our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
We may
be unable to adequately protect or enforce our patents and other
proprietary rights.
Our success depends, in part, on our ability to protect our
intellectual property and maintain the proprietary nature of our
technology through a combination of patents, licenses and other
intellectual property arrangements, without infringing the
proprietary rights of third parties. We have over 70 United
States and international patents related to aspects of
self-service coin-counting, including patents regarding machine
networking, fraud avoidance and voucher authentication. We also
have additional patent applications pending in the United States
and several foreign jurisdictions directed to our coin-counting,
entertainment and
e-payment
technologies. In addition, we may apply for or obtain (through
development, acquisition or otherwise) additional patents
regarding technologies used in our business.
Our patents may not be held valid if challenged, our patent
applications may not be issued, and other parties may claim
rights in or ownership of our patents and other proprietary
rights. Since many patent applications in the United States are
not publicly disclosed until the patent is issued, others may
have filed applications, which, if issued as patents, could
cover our products or technology. Patents issued to us may be
circumvented or fail to provide adequate protection of our
technologies. Our competitors might independently develop or
patent technologies that are substantially equivalent or
superior to our technologies. Further, since patent terms are
limited, other parties may begin practicing our patented
technologies when our related patents expire. For example, our
United States patent rights based on our original patent
application primarily relating to our coin-counting business
will expire in September 2012.
In addition, certain parties may assert claims of patent
infringement or misappropriation against us based on current or
pending United States or foreign patents, copyrights or trade
secrets, or contracts. If such claims were successful, our
business could be harmed. Defending our company and our
retailers against these types of claims, regardless of their
merits, could require us to incur substantial costs and divert
the attention of key personnel. Parties making these types of
claims may be able to obtain injunctive or other equitable
relief, which could effectively block or impair our ability to
provide our coin-counting, entertainment or
e-payment
services, in the United States or abroad. Such claims could also
result in an award of substantial damages. If third parties have
or obtain proprietary rights that our products infringe, we may
be unable to obtain necessary licenses from others at a
reasonable cost or at all. For example, we have been in dispute
with a former supplier, ScanCoin AB, regarding certain contract
rights and obligations as well as ownership of certain of our
patents and patent applications related to our coin-counting
business. In addition, if we instigate litigation to enforce our
patents or protect our other proprietary rights, or to determine
the validity and scope of other parties proprietary
rights, such litigation could cause us to spend significant
financial and management resources. For example, we filed a
claim in the federal court against ScanCoin North America
alleging that it is infringing on a patent we own related to
self-service coin machines. We also rely on trademarks,
copyrights, trade secrets and other intellectual property to
develop and maintain our competitive position. Although we
protect our intellectual property in part by confidentiality
agreements with our employees, consultants, vendors and
corporate partners, these parties may breach these agreements.
We may have inadequate remedies for any such breach and our
trade secrets may otherwise become known or be discovered
independently by our competitors. The failure to protect our
intellectual property rights effectively or to avoid infringing
the intellectual property rights of others, as well as
unfavorable rulings or settlements, could seriously harm our
business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our
strategy to cross-sell our products and services to retailers
may be unsuccessful.
An important part of our 4th Wall strategy is based on
cross-selling our selection of products and services to our
retailers. We may be unsuccessful in expanding our relationships
with retailers to include additional products and services in
their storefronts, due to, among other things, failure to
negotiate contracts for additional products and services on
acceptable terms, other parties providing similar products and
services on more favorable terms, or reluctance by retailers to
obtain these historically separate product and service
categories from a single provider. If we are unable to
effectively implement our cross-selling strategy, our business
could be negatively impacted.
9
We may
be unable to attract new retailers and penetrate new markets and
distribution channels.
In order to increase our coin-counting, entertainment and
e-payment
services machine and equipment installations, we need to attract
new retailers and develop operational or unit production cost
efficiencies that make it feasible for us to penetrate lower
density markets or new distribution channels such as banks and
credit unions. We may be unable to attract new retailers or
drive down costs relating to the manufacture, installation or
servicing of coin-counting, entertainment and
e-payment
services machines to levels that would enable us to operate
profitably in lower density markets or penetrate new
distribution channels. If we are unable to do so, our future
operating results could be adversely affected.
Payment
of increased service fees to retailers could negatively affect
our business results.
We face ongoing pricing pressure from our retailers to increase
the service fees we pay to them on coin and entertainment and
e-payment
products and services or to make other financial concessions to
win or retain business. If we are unable to respond effectively
to ongoing pricing pressures, we may fail to win or retain
certain accounts. Our fee arrangements are based on our
evaluation of unique factors with each retailer, such as total
revenue,
e-payment
capabilities, long-term non-cancelable contracts, installation
of our machines and equipment in high-traffic, urban or rural
locations and new product and service commitments. Together with
other factors, an increase in service fees paid or other
financial concessions made to our retailers could significantly
increase our direct operating expenses in future periods and
harm our business.
We
have substantial indebtedness.
On November 20, 2007, we entered into a senior secured
revolving credit facility, which replaced a prior credit
facility. The new credit facility provides for a
$400.0 million revolving line of credit, which under
specified conditions may increase to $450.0 million. As of
February 8, 2008, $296.0 million was outstanding under
this credit facility. The credit facility bears interest at
variable rates determined by prevailing interest rates and our
leverage ratio. As a result, our costs of borrowing are exposed
to risks of fluctuations in interest rates, as well as our
financial condition and operating results, which affect our
leverage ratio. Loans made pursuant to the credit facility are
secured by a first priority security interest in substantially
all of our assets and the assets of our domestic subsidiaries,
as well as a pledge of a substantial portion of our
subsidiaries capital stock. The credit facility matures on
November 20, 2012.
This credit facility may limit our ability to obtain future
financings or may negatively impact our business, financial
condition, results of operations and growth. Due to substantial
financial leverage, we may not be able to generate sufficient
cash flow to service the indebtedness, or to adequately fund our
operations. Moreover, the credit facility contains negative
covenants and restrictions relating to such things as certain
stock repurchases, liens, investments, capital expenditures,
other indebtedness, payments of dividends, and fundamental
changes or dispositions of our assets that could impair our
flexibility to pursue growth opportunities. In addition, the
credit facility requires that we meet certain financial
covenants, including a maximum consolidated leverage ratio and a
minimum consolidated interest coverage ratio, all as defined in
the credit facility. If the financial covenants are not met or
any other event of default occurs under the credit facility, our
lenders would be entitled to declare our indebtedness
immediately due and payable and exercise other remedies.
Defects,
failures or security breaches in and inadequate upgrade of our
operating systems could harm our business.
The operation of our coin-counting machines,
e-payment
equipment, and DVD kiosks depends on sophisticated software,
computer networking and communication services that may contain
undetected errors or may be subject to failures. These errors or
failures may arise particularly when new or enhanced products or
services are added. We have in the past experienced limited
delays and disruptions resulting from upgrading or improving our
operating systems. Future upgrades or improvements that may be
necessary to expand and maintain our business could result in
delays or disruptions that could seriously harm our operations.
10
In addition, we outsource to third-party providers certain
aspects of our operating systems, including our long-distance
telecommunication network. Accordingly, the effectiveness of our
operating systems is to a certain degree dependent on the
actions and decisions of our third-party providers.
Further, while we have taken significant steps to protect the
security of our operating systems and have established
back-up
systems and disaster recovery procedures, service disruptions
may result from intentional or unintentional acts of third
parties, computer viruses, natural disasters, or other causes
which are beyond our control. Any service disruptions, whether
due to errors or delays in or failure to adequately upgrade our
software or computing systems, interruptions or breaches in the
communications network, inadequate
back-up or
disaster recovery, or security breaches of the computer network
system, caused by us or third parties, could seriously harm our
business, financial condition and results of operations.
Failure
to adequately comply with information security policies or to
safeguard against breaches of such policies could adversely
affect our operations and could damage our business, reputation,
financial
position and results of operations.
As our business expands to provide new products and services,
including additional
e-payment
services, we are increasing the amount of consumer data that we
collect, transfer and retain as part of our business. These
activities are subject to laws and regulations, as well as
industry standards, in the United States and other jurisdictions
in which our products and services are available. These
requirements, which often differ materially and sometimes
conflict among the many jurisdictions in which we operate, are
designed to protect the privacy of consumers personal
information and to prevent that information from being
inappropriately used or disclosed. We maintain and review
technical and operational safeguards designed to protect this
information. However, despite those safeguards, it is possible
that hackers, employees acting contrary to our policies,
third-party agents or others could improperly access our systems
or improperly obtain or disclose data about our customers, or
that we may be determined not to be in compliance with
applicable legal requirements and industry standards for data
security, such as the Payment Card Industry guidelines. Any
breach of our security policies that compromises consumer data
or determination of non-compliance with applicable legal
requirements or industry standards for data security could
expose us to regulatory enforcement actions, card association or
other monetary fines or sanctions, or contractual liabilities,
limit our ability to provide our products and services, subject
us to litigation and damage our reputation.
Lack
of consumer confidence, whether real or perceived, in our
coin-counting machines could harm our business.
The accuracy of the coin-counting functionality of our machines
is important to consumers and our retailers. The failure to
maintain consumer confidence in our technology and systems could
harm our business. Our inability to collect the data from our
coin-counting machines could lead to a delay in processing coins
and crediting the accounts of our retailers for vouchers that
have already been redeemed. Any inaccuracy, loss or delay in
collecting or processing coin data could seriously harm our
operations.
Our
future operating results may fluctuate.
Our future operating results will depend significantly on our
ability to continue to drive new and repeat use of our
coin-counting, entertainment and
e-payment
products and services, our ability to develop and commercialize
new products and services and the costs incurred to do so, and
our ability to successfully integrate new lines of business into
our operations, including, for example, money transfer services.
Our operating results have a history of fluctuating and may
continue to fluctuate based upon many factors, including:
|
|
|
|
|
the transaction fees we charge consumers to use our services
|
|
|
|
the amount of service fees that we pay to our retailers,
|
|
|
|
our ability to establish or maintain relationships with
significant retailers on acceptable terms,
|
|
|
|
the successful operation of our coin-counting,
e-payment
and DVD network,
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
the commercial success of our retailers, which could be affected
by such factors as severe weather, strikes or general economic
conditions,
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in revenue generated by our coin-counting,
entertainment,
e-payment
and DVD products and services,
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in operating expenses caused by various factors,
including petroleum costs, labor costs and transportation costs,
|
|
|
|
our ability to effectively manage the product mix of our
entertainment services equipment to maximize consumer
preferences,
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in interest rates, which affects our debt service
obligations,
|
|
|
|
the timing of, and our ability to develop and successfully
commercialize, new or enhanced products and services,
|
|
|
|
the level of product and price competition,
|
|
|
|
activities of and acquisitions or announcements by competitors,
|
|
|
|
the impact from any impairment of inventory, goodwill, fixed
assets or intangibles related to our acquisitions,
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in consumer spending patterns, and
|
|
|
|
relationships with manufacturers and suppliers.
|
In addition, we have historically experienced seasonality in our
revenues, with higher revenues in the second half of the year
than in the first half of the year. Our coin services generally
experiences its highest revenues in the third calendar quarter,
followed by the fourth quarter, and relatively lower revenues in
the first half of the year. Our
e-payment
services (including money transfer) generally provides its
highest revenue in the fourth calendar quarter. We have not
experienced significant seasonality in our entertainment
services. We expect our results of operations will continue to
fluctuate both as a result of seasonal fluctuations and our
revenue mix between relatively higher margin coin and
e-payment
services and relatively lower margin entertainment services.
We
depend upon third-party manufacturers, suppliers and service
providers for key components and substantial support for our
coin-counting, entertainment,
e-payment
and DVD services machines and equipment.
We conduct limited manufacturing operations and depend on
outside parties to manufacture key components of our
coin-counting, entertainment,
e-payment
and DVD services machines and equipment. We intend to continue
to expand our installed base for coin-counting and
e-payment
machines in North America, Ireland and in the United Kingdom.
Such expansion may be limited by the manufacturing capacity of
our third-party manufacturers and suppliers. Third-party
manufacturers may not be able to meet our manufacturing needs in
a satisfactory and timely manner. If there is an unanticipated
increase in demand for coin-counting or
e-payment
machine or entertainment services equipment installations, we
may be unable to meet such demand due to manufacturing
constraints.
Some key hardware components used in the coin-counting and
e-payment
machines and entertainment services equipment are obtained from
a limited number of suppliers. We may be unable to continue to
obtain an adequate supply of these components in a timely manner
or, if necessary, from alternative sources. If we are unable to
obtain sufficient quantities of components or to locate
alternative sources of supply on a timely basis, we may
experience delays in installing or maintaining coin-counting and
e-payment
machines or entertainment services equipment, any of which could
seriously harm our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
In addition, we rely on third-party service providers for
substantial support and service efforts that we currently do not
provide directly. In particular, we contract with third-party
providers to arrange for
pick-up,
processing and deposit of coins as well as limited servicing of
our machines. We generally contract with a single transportation
provider and coin processor to service a particular region and
either party generally can terminate the contracts with advance
notice ranging from 30 to 90 days. We do not currently
have, nor do we expect to have in the foreseeable
12
future, the internal capability to provide
back-up coin
processing service in the event of a sudden disruption in
service from a commercial coin processor. Any failure by us to
maintain our existing coin processing relationships or to
establish new relationships on a timely basis or on acceptable
terms could harm our business, financial condition and results
of operations.
We are
subject to substantial federal, state, local and foreign laws
and government regulation specific to our
business.
Our business is subject to federal, state, local and foreign
laws and government regulation relating to coins, toy safety,
child protection, vehicle safety, access to machines in public
places, charitable fundraising, the transfer of money or things
of value, currency controls, weights and measures, payment cards
and other payment instruments, gaming, sweepstakes, contests,
consumer protection, consumer privacy, data protection and
information security. The application of existing laws and
regulations, changes in or enactment of new laws and regulations
that apply or may in the future apply to our current or future
products or services, changes in governmental authorities
interpretation of the application of various government
regulations to our business, or the failure or inability to gain
and retain required permits and approvals could materially and
adversely affect our business. In addition, many jurisdictions
require us to obtain certain licenses in connection with the
operations of our coin-counting, entertainment and
e-payment
services. For example, we have obtained or are currently
applying for licenses in those states and the District of
Columbia which require licenses with regard to provision of some
of our
e-payment
services, including stored value card and money transfer
transactions. There can be no assurance that we will be granted
all necessary licenses or permits in the future, that current
licenses or permits will be renewed or that regulators will not
revoke current licenses or permits. Given the unique nature of
our business and new products and services we may develop or
acquire in the future, the application of various laws and
regulations to our business is uncertain. Further, as
governmental and regulatory scrutiny and action with regard to
many aspects of our business increase, we expect that our costs
of complying with the applicable legal requirements will
increase, perhaps substantially.
Failure to comply with these laws and regulations could result
in, among other things, revocation of required licenses or
permits, loss of approved status, termination of contracts,
administrative enforcement actions and fines, class action
lawsuits, cease and desist orders and civil and criminal
liability. The occurrence of one or more of these events, as
well as the increased cost of compliance, could materially
adversely affect our business, financial condition and results
of operations.
There
are risks associated with conducting our business and sourcing
goods internationally.
We currently have coin operations in Canada and the United
Kingdom and entertainment services operations in Mexico. We
expect to continue increasing our deployment of both
coin-counting and
e-payment
machines and entertainment services equipment internationally.
In addition, as of December 31, 2007, our money transfer
services are offered in over 140 countries, and we expect to
continue expanding that area of our business over time.
Accordingly, political uncertainties, civil unrest, exchange
rate fluctuations, restrictions on the repatriation of funds,
adverse changes in legal requirements, including tax, tariff and
trade regulations, difficulties with foreign distributors and
other difficulties in managing an organization outside the
United States could seriously harm the development of our
business and ability to operate profitably. Further, as we do
business in an increasing number of countries, our business
becomes more exposed to the impact of the political and economic
uncertainties, including government oversight, of foreign
jurisdictions.
For example, substantially all of the plush toys and other
products dispensed from our entertainment services machines are
produced by foreign manufacturers, including a majority
purchased directly from manufacturers in China. Further, we
purchase other vending products from vendors that obtain a
significant percentage of such products from foreign
manufacturers. As a result, we are subject to changes in
governmental policies, exchange rate fluctuations, various
product quality standards, the imposition of tariffs, import and
export controls, transportation delays and interruptions and
political and economic disruptions which could disrupt the
supply and timely delivery of products manufactured abroad. In
addition, we could be affected by labor strikes in the sea
shipping, trucking and railroad industries. A reduction or
interruption in supplies or a significant increase in the price
of one or more supplies could have a material adverse effect on
our business.
13
Our
money transfer services business requires us to meet specific
federal, state, local and foreign laws and government
regulations, subjecting us to additional risk.
The money transfer industry is heavily regulated, both in the
United States and internationally. We operate our money transfer
services business under the authority of the licenses and
approvals that we have obtained where required from the various
jurisdictions in which we operate. There is no assurance that we
will be able to maintain these licenses and approvals in the
future.
In operating the money transfer services business in the United
States for example, we are responsible for compliance with a
variety of state laws and regulations, including licensing
requirements, applicable to the business. In addition, we are
subject to United States federal anti-money laundering laws,
including United States Department of the Treasury registration
requirements and reporting requirements for suspicious and
certain other transactions, and the requirements of the Office
of Foreign Assets Control, which prohibit transmitting money to
specified countries or to or on behalf of prohibited individuals
or entities. If we were to transmit money to or on behalf of, or
otherwise conduct business with, a prohibited individual or
entity, we could be required to pay significant damages,
including fines and penalties, and our ability to conduct
business in the United States and other jurisdictions could be
limited. The USA PATRIOT Act mandates several anti-money
laundering requirements. Any violation of anti-money laundering
laws could lead to significant penalties, and could limit our
ability to conduct business in the United States and other
jurisdictions.
In addition, the money transfer industry is subject to
international regulation, which varies from country to country.
In certain countries in which we operate, we are required to
maintain licenses or other governmental approvals in order to
operate this business. As described above, we are responsible
for compliance with these laws and regulatory requirements in
those countries in which we operate the money transfer services
business. Although most countries in which we operate this
business do not regulate this business to the same degree as the
United States, this could change in the future.
Failure to comply, or as discussed below the failure of a money
services business that we have acquired to comply before our
acquisition, with the laws and government regulations in
jurisdictions in which we operate, or in which the acquired
company operated the money transfer services business could
result in, among other things, revocation of required licenses
or registrations, loss of approved status, termination of
contracts with banks or retail representatives, administrative
enforcement actions and fines, penalties or other damages, class
action lawsuits, cease and desist orders,
and/or other
civil and criminal liability. The occurrence of one or more of
these events could adversely affect our business, financial
condition and results of operations. Furthermore, additions to
or changes in the laws, regulations or other industry practices
and standards in the United States or any of the foreign
countries in which the money transfer services business operates
could also increase our compliance and other costs of doing
business, require significant systems redevelopment, reduce the
market for or value of our products or services or render our
products or services less profitable or obsolete, lead to a loss
of agents, and have an adverse effect on our results of
operations.
Our
money transfer service is and will remain reliant on an
effective agent network.
Substantially all of the money transfer services revenue is
generated through an agent network spanning over
140 countries as of December 31, 2007. Agents include
banks and other financial institutions, regional micro-finance
companies, chain stores and local convenience stores.
Transaction volumes at existing agent locations often increase
over time and new agents provide us with additional revenue. If
agents decide to leave our network, or if we are unable to sign
new agents, our revenue and profit growth rates may be adversely
affected. Agent attrition might occur for a number of reasons,
including a competitor engaging an agent or an agents
dissatisfaction with its relationship with us or the revenue
derived from that relationship. In addition, agents may generate
fewer transactions or less revenue for various reasons,
including the appearance of competitors close to our agent
locations or increased competition. Because an agent is a third
party that engages in a variety of activities in addition to
providing our services, an agent may encounter business
difficulties unrelated to its provision of our services, which
could cause the agent to reduce its number of locations, hours
of operation, or cease doing business altogether. The failure of
the agent network to meet our expectations regarding revenue
production and business efficiencies may negatively impact our
business, financial condition and results of operations.
14
Further, failure, either intentional or unintentional, by our
agents to comply with the laws and regulatory requirements of
applicable jurisdictions, including anti-money laundering,
consumer privacy and information security restrictions, in
connection with our money transfer services business or
otherwise, could result in, among other things, revocation of
required licenses or registrations, loss of approved status,
termination of contracts with third parties, administrative
enforcement actions and fines, seizure or forfeiture of our
funds, class action lawsuits, cease and desist orders and civil
and criminal liability, as well as damage to our reputation. The
occurrence of one or more of these events could materially
adversely affect our business, financial condition and results
of operations.
Our
money transfer services may involve the movement of large sums
of money, and, as a result, our business is particularly
dependent on our ability to process and settle transactions
accurately and efficiently.
Our money transfer services business involves the movement of
large sums of money. Money transfer services revenues consist
primarily of transaction fees that are charged for the movement
of money. These transaction fees represent only a small fraction
of the total amount of money that is moved. Because we are
responsible for large sums of money that are substantially
greater than the revenues generated, the success of this
business particularly depends upon the efficient and error-free
handling of the money that is remitted and that is used to clear
payment instruments or complete money transfers. We rely on the
ability of our agents and employees and our operating systems
and network to process these transactions in an efficient,
uninterrupted and error-free manner. In addition, we rely on
third-party vendors in our business, including clearing banks
which clear our money orders, official checks and money
transfers, and certain of our telecommunication providers. In
the event of a breakdown, catastrophic event, security breach,
improper operation or any other event impacting our systems or
network or our vendors systems or processes, or improper
action by our agents, employees, or third party vendors, we
could suffer financial loss, loss of customers, regulatory
sanctions and damage to our reputation. In addition, we could
suffer financial loss from our failure for any reason to receive
good funds from the sender of a money transfer or the purchaser
of other of our money transfer products or services.
Higher
petroleum prices may adversely affect our operating results and
reduce our profitability.
We purchase a substantial amount of goods overseas, particularly
plush toys and other products dispensed from our entertainment
services machines, resulting in significant
transportation-related costs. Petroleum-based resins are used in
the manufacture of these products. In addition, we operate a
large number of vehicles used by our field service personnel for
the purpose of servicing and maintaining our coin-counting,
entertainment and
e-payment
services machines. Significant increases in petroleum prices
during recent years have negatively impacted our results of
operations. The cost of petroleum is volatile and may increase
as a result of natural disasters, political and geopolitical
issues or other reasons beyond our control. Further increases in
petroleum prices may have an adverse affect on our operating
results.
Our
customers ability to access our products and services can
be adversely affected by severe weather, natural disasters and
other events beyond our control, such as fires, power failures,
telecommunication loss and terrorist attacks.
Our operational and financial performance is a direct reflection
of customer use of and the ability to operate and service the
coin-counting, entertainment and
e-payment
services machines and equipment used in our business. Severe
weather, natural disasters and other events beyond our control
can, for extended periods of time, significantly reduce customer
use of our products and services as well as interrupt the
ability of our employees and third-party providers to operate
and service our equipment and machines. In some cases, severe
weather, natural disasters and other events beyond our control
may result in extensive damage to or destruction of our
infrastructure and equipment, including loss of machines used to
provide our products and services, which losses may not be fully
covered by insurance. For example, hurricanes in the gulf coast
region of the United States in 2005 caused damage and
operational interruptions to some of the retail and other
locations where our machines are installed.
15
Acquisitions
and investments involve risks that could harm our business and
impair our ability to realize potential benefits from such
acquisitions and investments.
As part of our business strategy, we have in the past sought and
may in the future seek to acquire or invest in businesses,
products or technologies that we feel could complement or expand
our business. For example, in October 2007, we purchased
substantially all of the assets of DVDXpress and in January 2008
we completed the acquisition of a majority interest in Redbox,
both providers of self-service DVD kiosks, and in January 2008
and May 2006, we purchased the money transfer services business
GroupEx and CMT, respectively. However, we may be unable to
adequately address the financial, legal and operational risks
raised by these acquisitions or investments, which could harm
our business and prevent us from realizing the projected
benefits of the acquisitions and investments. Further, the
evaluation and negotiation of potential acquisitions and
investments, as well as the integration of acquired businesses,
divert management time and other resources. In addition, we
cannot assure you that any particular transaction, even if
successfully completed, will ultimately benefit our business.
Certain financial and operational risks related to acquisitions
and investments that may have a material impact on our business
are:
|
|
|
|
|
the assumption of known and unknown liabilities of an acquired
company, including employee and intellectual property claims and
other violations of applicable law,
|
|
|
|
managing relationships with other investors and the companies in
which we have made investments,
|
|
|
|
use of cash resources and incurrence of debt and contingent
liabilities in funding acquisitions and investments,
|
|
|
|
difficulties and expenses in assimilating the operations,
products, technology, information systems or personnel of an
acquired company,
|
|
|
|
stockholder dilution if an acquisition is consummated through an
issuance of our securities,
|
|
|
|
amortization expenses related to acquired intangible assets and
other adverse accounting consequences,
|
|
|
|
costs incurred in identifying and performing due diligence on
potential targets that may or may not be successful,
|
|
|
|
impairment of relationships with employees, retailers and
affiliates of our business and the acquired business,
|
|
|
|
entrance into markets in which we have no direct prior
experience, and
|
|
|
|
impairment of goodwill arising from our acquisitions and
investments.
|
Recall
of any of the products dispensed by our entertainment services
machines or by the entertainment services industry generally
could adversely affect our entertainment services
business.
Our entertainment services machines and the entertainment
services industry generally, are subject to regulation by the
Consumer Product Safety Commission and similar state and
international regulatory authorities. The toys and other
products dispensed from our entertainment services machines
could be subject to involuntary recalls and other actions by
regulatory authorities. Concerns about product safety may lead
us to voluntarily recall or discontinue offering selected
products. Potential or actual defects in any of our products
distributed through our entertainment services machines could
result in the rejection of our entertainment services products
by consumers, damage to our reputation, lost sales, potential
inventory valuation write-downs, excess inventory, diverted
development resources and increased customer service and support
costs, any of which could harm our business. Any such errors,
potential or actual defects or recalls may not be covered by
insurance or cause our insurance costs to increase in future
periods.
16
We may
be subject to product liability claims if property or people are
harmed by our products and services.
Some of the products we sell, especially through our
entertainment services machines, may expose us to product
liability claims arising from personal injury, death or property
damage. Any such product liability claim may result in adverse
publicity regarding us, our entertainment service machines and
the products we sell. Even if we successfully defend ourselves
against or settle this type of claim, we could be forced to
spend a substantial amount of money in litigation or settlement
expenses and our management could be required to spend valuable
time in dealing with these claims. Further, our vendors may not
indemnify us against product liability. There is a risk that
claim awards, settlement payments, related costs or associated
liabilities may exceed, or fall outside the scope of, our
insurance coverage and we cannot be certain that insurance will
continue to be available to us on economically reasonable terms,
or at all. Any imposition, or even possible imposition, of
product liability could harm our business, financial condition
and operating results.
Our
stock price has been and may continue to be
volatile.
Our stock price has fluctuated substantially since our initial
public offering in July 1997. For example, during the twelve
months ended February 8, 2008, the closing price of our
common stock ranged from $25.00 to $34.50 per share. Our stock
price may fluctuate significantly in response to a number of
factors, including:
|
|
|
|
|
the termination, non-renewal or re-negotiation of one or more
retailer relationships,
|
|
|
|
acquisition, merger, investment and disposition activities,
|
|
|
|
operating results below market expectations and changes in, or
our failure to meet, financial estimates of securities analysts
or our own guidance,
|
|
|
|
release of analyst reports,
|
|
|
|
trends and fluctuations in the use of our coin, entertainment
and
e-payment
services,
|
|
|
|
period-to-period fluctuations in our financial results,
|
|
|
|
announcements regarding the establishment, modification or
termination of relationships regarding the development of new or
enhanced products and services,
|
|
|
|
announcements of technological innovations or new products or
services by us or our competitors,
|
|
|
|
ineffective internal controls,
|
|
|
|
industry developments, and
|
|
|
|
economic or other external factors.
|
In addition, the securities markets have experienced significant
price and volume fluctuations that are unrelated to the
operating performance of particular companies. These market
fluctuations may also seriously harm the market price of our
common stock.
Our
anti-takeover mechanisms may affect the price of our common
stock and make it harder for a third party to acquire us without
the consent of our board of directors.
We have implemented anti-takeover provisions that may discourage
takeover attempts and depress the market price of our stock.
Provisions in our certificate of incorporation, bylaws and
rights plan could make it more difficult for a third party to
acquire us, even if doing so would be beneficial to our
stockholders. Delaware law also imposes some restrictions on
mergers and other business combinations between us and any
acquirer of 15% or more of our outstanding common stock.
Furthermore, Washington law may impose additional restrictions
on mergers and other business combinations between us and any
acquirer of 10% or more of our outstanding common stock. These
provisions may make it harder for a third party to acquire us
without the consent of our board of directors, even if the offer
from a third party may be considered beneficial by some
stockholders.
17
We are headquartered in Bellevue, Washington, where we maintain
the majority of our sales, marketing, research and development,
quality control, customer service operations and administration.
In addition, our main entertainment services office is located
in Louisville, Colorado, our primary
e-payment
office is located in Chicago, Illinois and our primary money
transfer office is located in the United Kingdom.
Our corporate administrative, marketing and product development
facility is located in a 46,070 square foot facility in
Bellevue, Washington, under a lease that expires
December 1, 2009.
Our entertainment services office is located in a
31,000 square foot facility in Louisville, Colorado, which
is utilized for administrative, warehouse, pre-pack and field
office functions. The lease for this facility expires on
February 28, 2013.
|
|
Item 3.
|
Legal
Proceedings.
|
In April 2007, we received a request for arbitration filed by
ScanCoin AB (ScanCoin) before the Arbitration
Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce regarding
ownership of intellectual property related to an agreement
between Coinstar and ScanCoin dated April 23, 1993. The
parties have selected arbitrators, and we advanced partial
payment for the arbitration. In August 2007, we received
ScanCoins statement of claim. ScanCoin seeks a declaration
of ownership of over 70 of our patents and patent applications
related to our coin-counting machines, as well as monetary
damages of approximately $8.0 million, plus interest. We
believe that ScanCoins claims against us are without merit
and intend to defend ourselves vigorously in this arbitration.
In October 2007, we filed a claim in United States District
Court for the Northern District of Illinois against ScanCoin
North America alleging that it is infringing on a patent we own
relating to self-service coin machines.
|
|
Item 4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
|
No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during
the fourth quarter of 2007.
PART II
|
|
Item 5.
|
Market
for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters
and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
|
Market
Information
Our common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market
under the symbol CSTR. The following table sets
forth the high and low bid prices per share as reported by the
NASDAQ Global Select Market for our common stock for each
quarter during the last two fiscal years. The quotations
represent inter-dealer prices without retail markup, markdown or
commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Fiscal 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
27.13
|
|
|
$
|
22.72
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
29.58
|
|
|
|
21.83
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
29.85
|
|
|
|
21.60
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
34.40
|
|
|
|
27.92
|
|
Fiscal 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
31.65
|
|
|
$
|
28.30
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
34.97
|
|
|
|
30.20
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
34.00
|
|
|
|
30.36
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
34.74
|
|
|
|
24.69
|
|
18
The last reported sale price of our common stock on the NASDAQ
Global Select Market on February 8, 2008 was $31.97 per
share.
Holders
As of February 8, 2008, there were 165 holders of record of
our common stock. This does not include the number of persons
whose stock is in nominee or street name accounts
through brokers.
Dividends
We have never paid any cash dividends on our capital stock. We
currently intend to retain all future earnings to fund
development and growth of our business, retire debt obligations
or buy back our common stock for the foreseeable future. In
addition, we are restricted from paying dividends under our
current credit facility.
Recent
Sales of Unregistered Securities
We did not sell any unregistered securities during our fiscal
year ended December 31, 2007.
Securities
Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation
Plans
See Item 12, which incorporates by reference to the Proxy
Statement relating to our 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders,
the information concerning securities authorized for issuance
under our equity compensation plans.
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Under the terms of our current credit facility, we are permitted
to repurchase up to (i) $25.0 million of our common
stock plus (ii) proceeds received after November 20,
2007, from the issuance of new shares of capital stock under our
employee equity compensation plans. Subsequent to
November 20, 2007 and as of December 31, 2007, the
authorized cumulative proceeds received from option exercises or
other equity purchases under our equity compensation plans
totaled $0.3 million bringing the total authorized for
purchase under our credit facility to $25.3 million. After
taking into consideration our share repurchases of
$6.5 million subsequent to November 20, 2007, the
remaining amount authorized for repurchase under our credit
facility is $18.8 million as of December 31, 2007,
however we will not exceed our repurchase limit authorized by
the board of directors as outlined below.
Apart from our credit facility limitations, our board of
directors authorized the repurchase of up to $22.5 million
of our common stock plus additional shares equal to the
aggregate amount of net proceeds received after January 1,
2003, from our employee equity compensation plans. As of
December 31, 2007, this authorization allows us to
repurchase up to $15.0 million of our common stock.
Under our previous credit facility, we were permitted to
repurchase up to $3.0 million of our common stock plus
stock option proceeds received after July 7, 2004, from the
issuance of new shares of capital stock under our employee
equity compensation plans. As of November 20, 2007, the
remaining amount authorized for repurchase was
$11.7 million, however, this amount was superceded by the
higher amount authorized under our current credit facility.
19
The following table summarizes information regarding shares
repurchased during the quarter ended December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number
|
|
|
Approximate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
Dollar Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased as
|
|
|
of Shares that
|
|
|
|
Total Number
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Part of the
|
|
|
May Yet be
|
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
Price Paid
|
|
|
Publicly Announced
|
|
|
Purchased Under
|
|
|
|
Repurchased
|
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
Repurchase Programs
|
|
|
the Programs
|
|
|
October 1 - 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
11,593,687
|
|
November 1 - 19, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,665,097
|
|
November 20 - 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,275,984
|
|
December 1 - 31, 2007
|
|
|
238,142
|
|
|
$
|
27.42
|
|
|
|
238,142
|
|
|
|
14,965,596
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
238,142
|
|
|
$
|
27.42
|
|
|
|
238,142
|
|
|
$
|
14,965,596
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 6.
|
Selected
Financial Data.
|
The following selected financial data is qualified by reference
to, and should be read in conjunction with,
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations and the Consolidated
Financial Statements of Coinstar, Inc. and related Notes thereto
included elsewhere in this Annual Report.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REVENUE
|
|
$
|
546,297
|
|
|
$
|
534,442
|
|
|
$
|
459,739
|
|
|
$
|
307,100
|
|
|
$
|
176,136
|
|
EXPENSES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct operating
|
|
|
358,508
|
|
|
|
349,605
|
|
|
|
304,594
|
|
|
|
182,118
|
|
|
|
77,277
|
|
Operating taxes, net
|
|
|
(2,466
|
)
|
|
|
9,929
|
|
|
|
8,705
|
|
|
|
4,808
|
|
|
|
1,309
|
|
Marketing
|
|
|
11,899
|
|
|
|
14,420
|
|
|
|
10,748
|
|
|
|
12,925
|
|
|
|
13,215
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
5,153
|
|
|
|
5,246
|
|
|
|
5,716
|
|
|
|
5,465
|
|
|
|
5,772
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
55,193
|
|
|
|
50,977
|
|
|
|
32,488
|
|
|
|
27,475
|
|
|
|
19,344
|
|
Depreciation and other
|
|
|
58,841
|
|
|
|
52,836
|
|
|
|
45,347
|
|
|
|
35,302
|
|
|
|
27,006
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
7,331
|
|
|
|
6,220
|
|
|
|
4,556
|
|
|
|
2,014
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
Impairment and excess inventory charges
|
|
|
65,220
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from operations
|
|
|
(13,382
|
)
|
|
|
45,209
|
|
|
|
47,585
|
|
|
|
36,993
|
|
|
|
32,075
|
|
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income and other, net
|
|
|
2,348
|
|
|
|
1,543
|
|
|
|
1,477
|
|
|
|
344
|
|
|
|
263
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(17,069
|
)
|
|
|
(15,748
|
)
|
|
|
(12,916
|
)
|
|
|
(6,271
|
)
|
|
|
(1,210
|
)
|
Income (loss) from equity investments and other
|
|
|
1,333
|
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
353
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
|
|
Early retirement of debt
|
|
|
(1,794
|
)
|
|
|
(238
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(706
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes
|
|
|
(28,564
|
)
|
|
|
30,700
|
|
|
|
36,499
|
|
|
|
30,537
|
|
|
|
31,128
|
|
Income tax benefit (expense)
|
|
|
6,311
|
|
|
|
(12,073
|
)
|
|
|
(14,227
|
)
|
|
|
(10,169
|
)
|
|
|
(11,573
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
NET (LOSS) INCOME
|
|
$
|
(22,253
|
)
|
|
$
|
18,627
|
|
|
$
|
22,272
|
|
|
$
|
20,368
|
|
|
$
|
19,555
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET (LOSS) INCOME PER SHARE:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic(1)
|
|
$
|
(0.80
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.67
|
|
|
$
|
0.86
|
|
|
$
|
0.94
|
|
|
$
|
0.91
|
|
Diluted(1)
|
|
$
|
(0.80
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.66
|
|
|
$
|
0.86
|
|
|
$
|
0.93
|
|
|
$
|
0.90
|
|
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET DATA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
18,497
|
|
|
$
|
18,687
|
|
|
$
|
45,365
|
|
|
$
|
61,878
|
|
|
$
|
7,125
|
|
Cash in machine or in transit(2)
|
|
|
78,097
|
|
|
|
63,740
|
|
|
|
60,070
|
|
|
|
35,751
|
|
|
|
31,757
|
|
Cash being processed(3)
|
|
|
99,998
|
|
|
|
95,737
|
|
|
|
69,832
|
|
|
|
59,158
|
|
|
|
60,782
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
768,573
|
|
|
|
718,083
|
|
|
|
643,401
|
|
|
|
547,134
|
|
|
|
204,074
|
|
Total debt, capital lease obligations and other
|
|
|
272,651
|
|
|
|
200,264
|
|
|
|
210,478
|
|
|
|
211,410
|
|
|
|
17,461
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
354,509
|
|
|
|
343,229
|
|
|
|
328,951
|
|
|
|
282,046
|
|
|
|
191,370
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
305,130
|
|
|
|
321,365
|
|
|
|
294,047
|
|
|
|
226,146
|
|
|
|
114,190
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
See Note 12 to Consolidated Financial Statements for an
explanation of the determination of the number of shares used in
computing net income per share information, basic and diluted. |
|
(2) |
|
Cash in machines or in transit is unavailable for immediate cash
requirements as it represents cash being processed by carriers,
cash deposits in transit, or coin residing in our coin-counting
or entertainment services machines. |
|
(3) |
|
Cash being processed represents coin residing in our
coin-counting or entertainment services machines or being
processed by carriers, which we are specifically obligated to
use to settle our accrued liabilities payable to retailers. |
|
|
Item 7.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.
|
The following discussion and analysis should be read in
conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and
related Notes thereto included elsewhere in this Annual Report.
Except for the consolidated historical information, the
following discussion contains forward-looking statements. Actual
results could differ from those projected in the forward-looking
statements. Please refer to Special Note Regarding
Forward-Looking Statements at the beginning of this Annual
Report.
Overview
We are a multi-national company offering a range of
4th Wall solutions for retailers storefronts
consisting of self-service coin counting; entertainment services
such as skill-crane machines, bulk vending machines and kiddie
rides; and
e-payment
services such as money transfer services, prepaid wireless
products, stored value cards, payroll cards and prepaid debit
cards. In addition, we offer self-service DVD kiosks where
consumers can rent or purchase movies. We also offer a range of
point-of-sale terminals, stand-alone
e-payment
kiosks and
e-payment
enabled coin-counting machines in drugstores, universities,
shopping malls, supermarkets and convenience stores in the
United States, the United Kingdom and other countries.
Strategy
Our strategy, embodied in our 4th Wall concept, is based on
cross-selling our full range of products and services to our
retailers. In addition, we believe that we will continue to
increase operating efficiencies by combining and concentrating
our products and services in our retailers storefront.
21
We expect to continue devoting significant resources to building
our sales organization in connection with our 4th Wall
cross-selling strategy, adding administrative personnel to
support our growing organization and developing the information
technology systems and technology infrastructure necessary to
support our products and services. We expect to continue
evaluating new marketing and promotional programs to increase
use of our products and services.
Business
Coin
services
We are the leader in the self-service coin-counting services
market. We own and operate the only multi-national fully
automated network of self-service coin-counting machines across
the United States, Canada, Puerto Rico and in the United
Kingdom. We estimate that at any one time, there is more than
$10.5 billion worth of coin sitting idle in households in
the United States. In 2007, consumers processed more than
$2.9 billion worth of coin through our coin-counting
machines.
We own and service all of our coin-counting machines. Consumers
feed loose change into the machines, which count the change and
then dispense vouchers or, in some cases, issue
e-payment
products, at the consumers election. Each voucher lists
the dollar value of coins counted, less our transaction fee,
which is typically 8.9% of the value of coins counted. In
certain cases when our
e-payment
product is issued instead of a voucher, the consumer does not
pay a fee. We generate revenue through transaction fees from our
customers and business partners.
We launched our business in North America with the installation
of the first
Coinstar®
coin-counting machine in the early 1990s and in 2001; we began
offering our coin services in the United Kingdom. Since
inception, our coin-counting machines have counted and processed
more than 345 billion coins worth more than
$18.6 billion in more than 505 million self-service
coin-counting transactions. We own and operate more than 15,400
coin-counting machines in the United States, Canada, Puerto Rico
and the United Kingdom (approximately 10,700 of which are
e-payment
enabled).
In February 2008, we reached an agreement with Wal-Mart to
significantly expand our coin-counting machines installed at
Wal-Mart locations over the next 12 to 18 months.
Entertainment
services
We are the leading owner and operator of skill-crane and bulk
vending machines in the United States. We estimate that the
market for our entertainment services is approximately
$1.1 billion annually in the United States.
Our entertainment services machines consist primarily of
skill-crane machines, bulk vending and kiddie rides, which are
installed in more than 27,000 retail locations, totaling more
than 280,000 pieces of equipment as of December 31, 2007.
As with our coin services business, we own and service all of
our entertainment services machines, providing a convenient and
trouble free service to retailers. We generate revenue from
money deposited in our machines that dispense plush toys,
novelties and other items.
In February 2008, we reached an agreement with Wal-Mart to
remove approximately 50% of our cranes, bulk heads, and kiddie
rides from our existing Wal-Mart locations during the first two
quarters of 2008. Accordingly, we anticipate making certain
resource re-allocations and will continue to evaluate any
appropriate restructuring in this area in an effort to modulate
operating expenses. Ultimately, any resource allocations will
depend on the interplay between the net number of entertainment
machines coming out of, and coin-counting machines going in to,
Wal-Mart locations.
E-payment
services
We offer
e-payment
services, including money transfer services, activating and
reloading value on prepaid wireless accounts, selling stored
value cards, loading and reloading prepaid debit cards and
prepaid phone cards, prepaid phones, and providing payroll card
services. We offer various
e-payment
services in the United States and the United Kingdom through
17,500 point-of-sale terminals, 400 stand-alone
e-payment
kiosks and 10,700
22
e-payment-enabled
coin-counting machines in supermarkets, drugstores,
universities, shopping malls and convenience stores.
We have relationships with national wireless carriers, such as
Sprint, Verizon,
T-Mobile,
Virgin Mobile and AT&T. We generate revenue primarily
through commissions or fees charged per
e-payment
transaction and pay our retailers a fee based on commissions
earned on the sales of
e-payment
services.
Recent
Events
On January 1, 2008, we exercised our option to acquire a
majority ownership interest in the voting equity of Redbox under
the terms of the LLC Interest Purchase Agreement dated
November 17, 2005. In conjunction with the option exercise
and payment of $5.1 million, our ownership interest
increased from 47.3% to 51.0%. Since our original investment in
Redbox, we have been accounting for our 47.3% ownership interest
under the equity method in our Consolidated Financial
Statements. Along with our acquisition of DVDXpress in October
2007 and the majority ownership in Redbox, we offer self-service
DVD kiosks where consumers can rent or purchase movies. Our DVD
kiosks supply all the functionality of a traditional video
rental store, yet occupy an area of less than ten square feet.
Consumers use a touch screen to select their DVD, swipe a valid
credit or debit card, and go. The process is designed to be
fast, efficient and fully automated with no upfront or
membership fees. Typically, the DVD rental price is a flat fee
plus tax for one night and if the consumer chooses to keep the
DVD for additional nights, they are automatically charged the
same flat fee price. Our DVD kiosks are available in all states
in the continental United States and Puerto Rico and offer our
consumers with a more convenient home entertainment solution. We
generate revenue primarily through fees charged to rent or
purchase a DVD, which our retail partners receive a percentage
of our fee.
In February 2008, we reached an agreement with Wal-Mart to
significantly expand our Redbox DVD kiosks installed at Wal-Mart
locations over the next 12 to 18 months.
As of January 18, 2008, the financial results of Redbox
will be consolidated into our financial statements. Further, we
will recognize a reduction of minority interests on the
Consolidated Statement of Operations relating to the 49% equity
interest to which we do not own. We expect our 2008 consolidated
revenues to significantly increase due to the consolidation of
Redbox and we further expect our consolidated operating expenses
will increase accordingly.
Effective January 1, 2008, we completed the acquisition of
GroupEx Financial Corporation, JRJ Express Inc. and Kimeco, LLC
(collectively, GroupEx), for an aggregate purchase
price of up to $70.0 million. The purchase price includes a
$60.0 million cash payment (subject to a customary working
capital adjustment) at closing. Of the $60.0 million paid
at closing, $6.0 million is being held in escrow as partial
security for the indemnification obligations of the sellers
under the agreement until the earlier of (1) the date
eighteen months following the closing and (2) the date
thirty days after completion in calendar year 2009 of the 2008
calendar year audit. An additional $34.0 million of the
$60.0 million paid at closing is being held in escrow as
partial security for the indemnification obligations of the
sellers under the agreement with respect to a lawsuit against
GroupEx and one of the sellers, which will be held until a final
court order or written settlement agreement resolving such
lawsuit has been obtained. In addition, there is a contingent
payment of up to $10.0 million should certain performance
conditions be met in the fifteen months following the closing.
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and
results of operations is based upon our Consolidated Financial
Statements, which have been prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America (GAAP). The preparation of these financial
statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and
expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities. We evaluate our estimates on an ongoing basis. Our
estimates are based on historical experience and on various
other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the
circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making
judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities
that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results
may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or
conditions.
23
Revenue recognition: We recognize revenue as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Coin-counting revenue is recognized at the time the
consumers coins are counted by our coin-counting machines;
|
|
|
|
Entertainment services revenue is recognized at the time cash is
deposited in our machines. Cash deposited in the machines that
has not yet been collected is referred to as cash in machine and
is estimated at period end and reported on the balance sheet as
cash in machine or in transit. This estimate is based on the
average daily revenue per machine multiplied by the number of
days since the coin in the machine has been collected. The
estimated value of our entertainment services cash in machine
was approximately $8.4 million and $7.1 million as of
December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively;
|
|
|
|
E-payment
services revenue is recognized at the point of sale based on our
commissions earned, net of retailer fees. Money transfer revenue
is recognized at the time the customer completes the transaction.
|
Purchase price allocations: In connection with
our acquisitions, we have allocated the respective purchase
prices plus transaction costs to the estimated fair values of
assets acquired and liabilities assumed. These purchase price
allocations were based on our estimates of fair values.
Adjustments to our purchase price allocation estimates are made
based on our final analysis of the fair value during the
allocation period, which is within one year of the purchase date.
Goodwill and intangible assets: Goodwill
represents the excess of cost over the estimated fair value of
net assets acquired, which is not being amortized. We test
goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level on an annual
or more frequent basis as determined necessary. FASB Statement
No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
(SFAS 142) requires a two-step goodwill
impairment test whereby the first step, used to identify
potential impairment, compares the fair value of a reporting
unit with its carrying amount including goodwill. If the fair
value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill
of the reporting unit is considered not impaired and the second
test is not performed. The second step of the impairment test is
performed when required and compares the implied fair value of
the reporting unit goodwill with the carrying amount of that
goodwill. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit goodwill
exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill, an impairment
loss shall be recognized in an amount equal to that excess.
As of December 31, 2007, we have two reporting units; North
American and International. Based on the annual goodwill test
for impairment we performed for the years ended
December 31, 2007 and 2006, we determined there was no
impairment of our goodwill. There was no goodwill impairment
associated with the asset group that had the impairment charge
described below as that asset group is not a reporting unit as
defined by SFAS 142.
Our intangible assets are comprised primarily of retailer
relationships acquired in connection with our acquisitions
through the end of 2007. We used expectations of future cash
flows to estimate the fair value of the acquired retailer
relationships. We amortize our intangible assets on a
straight-line basis over their expected useful lives which range
from 1 to 40 years.
Impairment of long-lived assets: Long-lived
assets, such as property and equipment and purchased intangibles
subject to amortization, are reviewed for impairment at least
annually or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate
that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.
Factors that would indicate potential impairment include, but
are not limited to, significant decreases in the market value of
the long-lived asset(s), a significant change in the long-lived
assets physical condition and operating or cash flow
losses associated with the use of the long-lived asset.
Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a
comparison of the carrying amount of an asset group to the
estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be
generated by the asset group. If the carrying amount of an asset
group exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment
charge is recognized in the amount by which the carrying amount
of the asset group exceeds the fair value of the asset group.
While we continue to review and analyze many factors that can
impact our business in the future, our analyses are subjective
and are based on conditions existing at, and trends leading up
to, the time the estimates and assumptions are made. Actual
results could differ materially from these estimates and
assumptions.
Prior to December 31, 2007, Wal-Mart management expressed
its intent to reset and optimize its store entrances. In
February 2008, we reached an agreement with Wal-Mart to
significantly expand our coin-counting
24
machines and our DVD kiosk locations over the next 12 to
18 months. In conjunction with the expansion, we will be
removing approximately 50% of our cranes, bulk heads, and kiddie
rides from our existing Wal-Mart locations. This decision, along
with other contract terminations or decisions to scale-back the
number of entertainment machines with other retail partners as
well as macro-economic trends negatively affecting the
entertainment service industry, resulted in excess equipment and
inventory. As a result, we recorded a non-cash impairment charge
of $65.2 million related to an asset group that includes
this equipment and certain intangible assets. Of this amount,
$52.6 million relates to the impairment of these cranes,
bulk heads and kiddie rides, $7.9 million relates to the
impairment of intangible assets and $4.7 million relates to
the write-off of inventory. We estimated the fair values of
these assets using discounted cash flows, or liquidation value
for certain assets, which we considered an appropriate method in
the circumstance.
Income taxes: Deferred income taxes are
provided for the temporary differences between the financial
reporting basis and the tax basis of our assets and liabilities
and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. A valuation
allowance is established when necessary to reduce deferred tax
assets to the amount expected to be realized. Deferred tax
assets and liabilities and operating loss and tax credit
carryforwards are measured using enacted tax rates expected to
apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary
differences and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards are
expected to be recovered or settled.
Effective January 1, 2007, we adopted the provisions of
FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty
in Income Taxes (FIN 48). FIN 48 is an
interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for
Income Taxes (SFAS 109) which provides
comprehensive guidance on the recognition and measurement of tax
positions in previously filed tax returns or positions expected
to be taken in future tax returns. The tax benefit from an
uncertain tax position must meet a
more-likely-than-not recognition threshold and is
measured at the largest amount of benefit greater than 50%
determined by cumulative probability of being realized upon
ultimate settlement with the taxing authority. The
interpretation provides guidance on derecognition,
classification, interest and penalties, as well as disclosure
requirements in the financial statements of uncertain tax
positions.
As of the adoption date and as of December 31, 2007 we
identified $1.2 million of unrecognized tax benefits which
would affect our effective tax rate if recognized.
In accordance with our accounting policy, we recognize interest
and penalties associated with uncertain tax positions in income
tax expense. As of the adoption date and December 31, 2007,
it was not necessary to accrue interest and penalties associated
with the uncertain tax positions identified.
Cash in machine or in transit and cash being
processed: Cash in machine or in transit
represents coin residing or estimated in our coin-counting or
entertainment machines, cash being processed by carriers, cash
in our cash registers and cash deposits in transit. Cash being
processed represents cash which we are obligated to use to
settle our accrued liabilities payable to retailers.
Stock-based compensation: Effective
January 1, 2006, we adopted the fair value recognition
provisions of FASB Statement No. 123 (revised 2004),
Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123R) using the
modified-prospective transition method. Under this transition
method, compensation expense recognized includes the estimated
fair value of stock options granted on and subsequent to
January 1, 2006, based on the grant date fair value
estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123R,
and the estimated fair value of the portion vesting in the
period for options granted prior to, but not vested as of
January 1, 2006, based on the grant date fair value
estimated in accordance with the original provisions of FASB
Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation. In accordance with the modified-prospective
transition method, results for prior periods have not been
restated.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 157,
Fair Value Measures (SFAS 157), which
defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair
value and enhances disclosures about fair value measures
required under other accounting pronouncements, but does not
change existing guidance as to whether or not an instrument is
carried at fair value. The effective date of SFAS 157 for
nonfinancial assets and liabilities has been delayed by one year
to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. We are
currently reviewing the provisions of SFAS 157 to determine
the impact to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
25
In February 2007, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 159,
The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities including an amendment to FASB Statement
No. 115 (SFAS 159). Under
SFAS 159, entities may elect to measure specified financial
instruments and warranty and insurance contracts at fair value
on a
contract-by-contract
basis, with changes in fair value recognized in earnings each
reporting period. The election, called the fair value option,
will enable entities to achieve an offset accounting effect for
changes in fair value of certain related assets and liabilities
without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions.
SFAS 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2007. The adoption of the provisions of
SFAS 159 is not expected to have a material impact to our
Consolidated Financial Statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 141
(revised 2007), Business Combinations
(SFAS 141R). SFAS 141R, retains the
fundamental requirements of Statement No. 141 to account
for all business combinations using the acquisition method
(formerly the purchase method) and for an acquiring entity to be
identified in all business combinations. However, the new
standard requires the acquiring entity in a business combination
to recognize all the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in
the transaction; establishes the acquisition-date fair value as
the measurement objective for all assets acquired and
liabilities assumed; and requires the acquirer to disclose the
information they need to evaluate and understand the nature and
financial effect of the business combination. SFAS 141R is
effective for acquisitions made on or after the first day of
annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2008. We
are currently reviewing the provisions of SFAS 141R to
determine the impact to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 160,
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements An Amendment of ARB No. 51
(SFAS 160). SFAS 160 establishes new
accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling
interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a
subsidiary. SFAS 160 is effective for annual periods
beginning on or after December 15, 2008. We are currently
reviewing the provisions of SFAS 160 to determine the
impact to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior year
amounts to conform to the current year presentation.
Results
of Operations Years Ended December 31, 2007,
2006 and 2005
Revenue
Our coin and
e-payment
revenues consist primarily of the revenue generated from our
coin-counting services and our
e-payments
services such as money transfer services, prepaid wireless
products, stored value cards and payroll cards.
Our entertainment revenues consist primarily of the revenues
generated from our skill-crane machines, bulk vending machines
and kiddie rides.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
$ Chng
|
|
|
% Chng
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
$ Chng
|
|
|
% Chng
|
|
|
Coin and
e-payment
revenues
|
|
$
|
307.4
|
|
|
$
|
261.0
|
|
|
$
|
46.4
|
|
|
|
17.8
|
%
|
|
$
|
220.7
|
|
|
$
|
40.3
|
|
|
|
18.3
|
%
|
Entertainment revenues
|
|
$
|
238.9
|
|
|
$
|
273.4
|
|
|
$
|
(34.5
|
)
|
|
|
−12.6
|
%
|
|
$
|
239.0
|
|
|
$
|
34.4
|
|
|
|
14.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenue
|
|
$
|
546.3
|
|
|
$
|
534.4
|
|
|
$
|
11.9
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
459.7
|
|
|
$
|
74.7
|
|
|
|
16.2
|
%
|
Our coin and
e-payment
revenues increased in 2007 from 2006 and in 2006 from 2005 as a
result of an increase in the number of transactions, an increase
in the number of installed coin-counting machines, the volume of
coins processed by our coin-counting machines, and as a result
of our acquisition of CMT in the second quarter of 2006.
The total dollar value of coins processed through our network
increased to approximately $2.9 billion in 2007 from
$2.6 billion in 2006 and $2.3 billion in 2005.
Additionally, the total coin-counting machines installed as of
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 were approximately 15,400,
13,500 and 12,800, respectively. Revenues for CMT were
$24.2 million and $9.0 million for 2007 and 2006,
respectively. We expect to continue installing
26
additional coin-counting,
e-payment,
and DVD machines and therefore, expect to continue to experience
revenue growth in these areas in the foreseeable future.
We believe that the decrease in our entertainment services
revenues in 2007 from 2006 is due to several factors, including
the decrease in foot traffic among the United States
retailers, the China lead paint scare and the status of the
United States economy. We expect that these factors will
continue to negatively affect our entertainment services
business in 2008. Additionally, we expect our entertainment
services revenue to further decrease in 2008 as a result of our
agreement reached with Wal-Mart to remove of approximately 50%
of our cranes, bulk heads, and kiddie rides from our existing
Wal-Mart locations during the first two quarters of 2008. Our
entertainment services revenues increased in 2006 from 2005 as a
result of the acquisition of Amusement Factory in the fourth
quarter of 2005 and an increase in machines installed.
Direct
Operating Expenses
Our direct operating expenses consist primarily of the cost of
(1) the percentage of transaction fees and commissions we
pay to our retailers and agents, (2) coin
pick-up,
transportation and processing expenses, (3) the cost of
plush toys and other products dispensed from the skill-crane and
bulk-vending machines and (4) field operations support and
related expenses. Variations in the percentage of transaction
fees we pay to our retailers and agents may result in increased
expenses. Such variations are based on our negotiations and
evaluation of certain factors, such as total revenue,
e-payment
capabilities, long-term non-cancelable contracts, installation
of our machines in high traffic or urban or rural locations, new
product commitments, co-op marketing incentive, or other
criteria.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
$ Chng
|
|
|
% Chng
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
$ Chng
|
|
|
% Chng
|
|
|
Direct operating expenses
|
|
$
|
358.5
|
|
|
$
|
349.6
|
|
|
$
|
8.9
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
|
$
|
304.6
|
|
|
$
|
45.0
|
|
|
|
14.8
|
%
|
as a% of Total Revenue
|
|
|
65.6
|
%
|
|
|
65.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct operating expenses increased in 2007 and in 2006
primarily as result of an increase in the number of revenue
transactions and the acquisition of CMT in the second quarter of
2006 and Amusement Factory in the fourth quarter of 2005, offset
by operating synergies achieved in integration of our acquired
companies. In addition, direct operating expenses increased in
2006 from 2005 as a result of $1.1 million incremental
expense due to the adoption of SFAS 123R. Direct operating
expenses for CMT were $22.8 million and $8.5 million
for 2007 and 2006, respectively. We are continuing to integrate
our various business operations and have realized operating
expense efficiencies.
Operating
taxes, net
Taxes related to operating our business are recorded in
operating taxes, net on the consolidated statement of
operations. Such taxes include the 2007 telecommunication fee
refund, property taxes, sales and use taxes, and franchise taxes
and do not include income taxes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
$ Chng
|
|
|
% Chng
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
$ Chng
|
|
|
% Chng
|
|
|
Operating taxes, net
|
|
$
|
(2.5
|
)
|
|
$
|
9.9
|
|
|
$
|
(12.4
|
)
|
|
|
−125.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
8.7
|
|
|
$
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
13.8
|
%
|
as a% of Total Revenue
|
|
|
−0.5
|
%
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating taxes, net decreased in 2007 from 2006 primarily due
to the recognition of a telecommunication fee refund of
$11.8 million as a result of an Internal Revenue Service
ruling that telecommunication fees paid during the period of
March 1, 2003 through July 31, 2006 were improperly
collected by the United States government. The
$11.8 million represents the refund amount as filed on our
fiscal year 2006 federal income tax return. In February 2008, we
received the refund in the amount that we estimated.
Marketing
Marketing expenses represent our cost of advertising, marketing
and public relation efforts in national and regional advertising
and the major international markets in which we operate our
money transfer services. For
27
example, we have been using advertising to introduce
e-payment
features on our coin-counting machines and other
e-payment
product channels such as our stored value card offerings. This
directed marketing and advertising approach, which we expect to
continue through 2008, continues driving increased trial and
repeat use of both our coin services offerings and
e-payment
products.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
$ Chng
|
|
|
% Chng
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
$ Chng
|
|
|
% Chng
|
|
|
Marketing
|
|
$
|
11.9
|
|
|
$
|
14.4
|
|
|
$
|
(2.5
|
)
|
|
|
−17.4
|
%
|
|
$
|
10.7
|
|
|
$
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
34.6
|
%
|
as a% of Total Revenue
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketing expenses decreased in 2007 from 2006 primarily due to
advertising mix in our different markets offset by an increase
in spending resulting from the acquisition of CMT in the second
quarter of 2006. Marketing expenses increased in 2006 from 2005
primarily as a result of our acquisition of CMT in the second
quarter of 2006.
Research
and Development
Our research and development expenses consist primarily of
development costs of our coin-counting machine software, network
applications, machine improvements and new product development.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
$ Chng
|
|
|
% Chng
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
$ Chng
|
|
|
% Chng
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
$
|
5.2
|
|
|
$
|
5.2
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
5.7
|
|
|
$
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
−8.8
|
%
|
as a% of Total Revenue
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development expenses have remained relatively
consistent in 2007, 2006 and in 2005. Research and development
expenses represent expenditures to support development and
design of complementary new product ideas and to continue our
ongoing efforts to enhance our existing products and services,
primarily our coin-counting system. We intend to continue to
invest in research and development at levels commensurate with
2007.
General
and Administrative
Our general and administrative expenses consist primarily of
administrative support for field operations, customer service,
systems and engineering support, computer network operations,
finance, human resources, occupancy expenses, legal expenses and
insurance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
$ Chng
|
|
|
% Chng
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
$ Chng
|
|
|
% Chng
|
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
$
|
55.2
|
|
|
$
|
51.0
|
|
|
$
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
8.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
32.5
|
|
|
$
|
18.5
|
|
|
|
56.9
|
%
|
as a% of Total Revenue
|
|
|
10.1
|
%
|
|
|
9.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses increased in 2007 from 2006
due to the acquisition of CMT in the second quarter of 2006, an
increase in stock-based compensation expense, an increase in
rent expense due to additional administrative office space,
offset by administrative synergies achieved in the integration
of our administrative processes. General and administrative
expenses for CMT were $6.5 million and $3.7 million
for 2007 and 2006, respectively.
General and administrative expenses increased in 2006 from 2005
as a result of the incremental expense due to the adoption of
SFAS 123R of $4.0 million, acquisitions of our
entertainment subsidiaries and the incremental cost of
supporting subsidiary companies with regional offices throughout
the United States and in the United Kingdom.
28
Depreciation
and Other
Our depreciation and other expenses consist primarily of
depreciation charges on our installed coin-counting and
entertainment services machines as well as on computer equipment
and leased automobiles.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
$ Chng
|
|
|
% Chng
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
$ Chng
|
|
|
% Chng
|
|
|
Depreciation and other
|
|
$
|
58.8
|
|
|
$
|
52.8
|
|
|
$
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
11.4
|
%
|
|
$
|
45.3
|
|
|
$
|
7.5
|
|
|
|
16.6
|
%
|
as a% of Total Revenue
|
|
|
10.8
|
%
|
|
|
9.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and other expense increased in 2007 and in 2006
primarily due to our various acquisitions during these periods
as well as an increase in our capital expenditures primarily
related to new and upgrades to existing coin-counting and
entertainment machines.
Amortization
of Intangible Assets
Our amortization expense consists of amortization of intangible
assets, which are mainly comprised of the value assigned to our
acquired retailer relationships and, to a lesser extent,
internally developed software.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
$ Chng
|
|
|
% Chng
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
$ Chng
|
|
|
% Chng
|
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
$
|
7.3
|
|
|
$
|
6.2
|
|
|
$
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
17.7
|
%
|
|
$
|
4.6
|
|
|
$
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
34.8
|
%
|
as a% of Total Revenue
|
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets increased in 2007 and in 2006
due to the full-year amortization related to our various
acquisitions, including CMT in 2006.
Impairment
and excess inventory charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
$ Chng
|
|
|
% Chng
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
$ Chng
|
|
|
% Chng
|
|
|
Impairment and excess inventory charges
|
|
$
|
65.2
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
65.2
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
as a% of Total Revenue
|
|
|
11.9
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior to December 31, 2007, Wal-Mart management expressed
its intent to reset and optimize its store entrances. In
February 2008, we reached an agreement with Wal-Mart to
significantly expand our coin-counting machines and our DVD
kiosks locations over the next 12 to 18 months. In
conjunction with the expansion, we will be removing
approximately 50% of our cranes, bulk heads, and kiddie rides
from our existing Wal-Mart locations. As a result, we recorded a
non-cash impairment charge of $65.2 million as of
December 31, 2007 included in the Consolidated Statement of
Operations related to an asset group that includes this
equipment and certain intangible assets. Of this amount,
$52.6 million relates to the impairment of these cranes,
bulk heads, and kiddie rides, $7.9 million relates to the
impairment of intangible assets and $4.7 million relates to
the write-off of inventory.
Other
Income and Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
$ Chng
|
|
|
% Chng
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
$ Chng
|
|
|
% Chng
|
|
|
Interest income and other, net
|
|
$
|
2.3
|
|
|
$
|
1.5
|
|
|
$
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
53.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
1.5
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Interest expense
|
|
$
|
(17.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
(15.7
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.4
|
)
|
|
|
8.9
|
%
|
|
$
|
(12.9
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2.8
|
)
|
|
|
21.7
|
%
|
Income (loss) from equity investments and other
|
|
$
|
1.3
|
|
|
$
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
−1400.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
0.4
|
|
|
$
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
−125.0
|
%
|
Early retirement of debt
|
|
$
|
(1.8
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.6
|
)
|
|
|
800.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
29
Interest income and other, net increased in 2007 from 2006
primarily due to the recognition of interest income on our
telecommunication fee refund offset by lower than average
investment balances. Interest income and other, net was
unchanged in 2006 from 2005.
Interest expense increased in 2007 and in 2006 primarily due to
higher outstanding debt balances, higher interest rates and
increased capital leases.
Income (loss) from equity investments and other increased in
2007 from 2006 primarily as a result of recording our portion of
the telecommunication fee refund expected to be collected by us
on behalf of a related third party.
Early retirement of debt expense was $1.8 million in 2007
and $0.2 million in 2006. On November 20, 2007, in
connection with entering into our new debt facility, we retired
the outstanding balance of our previous debt facility dated
July 7, 2004 resulting in a charge of $1.8 million for
the write-off of deferred financing fees. The early retirement
of debt expense in 2006 relates to accelerated deferred
financing fees related to our mandatory pay down of
$16.9 million under our previous debt facility in the first
quarter of 2006.
Income
Taxes
The effective income tax rate was 22.1% in 2007 compared with
39.3% in 2006 and 39.0% in 2005. As illustrated in Note 11
to the Consolidated Financial Statements, the effective income
tax rate for 2007 varies from the federal statutory tax rate of
35% primarily due to a change in valuation allowance on foreign
net operating losses, the impact of changes in foreign tax
rates, state income taxes, non-deductible stock-based
compensation expense recorded for incentive stock option
(ISO) awards offset by the benefit arising for ISO
disqualifying dispositions and changes in deferred tax assets
due to adjustments to state operating loss carryforwards.
The effective income tax rate for 2006 varies from the federal
statutory tax rate of 35% primarily due to state income taxes,
non-deductible stock-based compensation expense recorded for ISO
awards offset by the benefit arising for ISO disqualifying
dispositions, the impact of our election during the third
quarter of 2006 of the indefinite reversal criteria for
unremitted foreign earnings under APB No. 23, Accounting
for Income Taxes Special Areas (APB
23), the impact of adjusting our deferred tax asset
associated with state operating loss carryforwards, the impact
of recognizing an increase to our available research and
development credit, as well as the impact of recognition of a
valuation allowance to offsetting foreign deferred tax assets
relating to our acquisition of CMT. The effective income tax
rate for 2005 varied from the federal statutory tax rate of 35%
primarily due to state income taxes.
As of December 31, 2007 and 2006, our net deferred income
tax assets totaled $19.9 million and $10.3 million,
respectively. In the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006
and 2005 we recorded tax (benefit) expense of
$(6.3) million, $12.1 million and $14.2 million,
respectively, which, as a result of our United States net
operating loss carryforwards, will not result in cash payments
for United States federal income taxes other than federal
alternative minimum taxes. Current tax payments have been made
to state and foreign jurisdictions.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Cash and
Liquidity
Our business involves collecting and processing large volumes of
cash, most of it in the form of coins. We present three
categories of cash on our balance sheet: cash and cash
equivalents, cash in machine or in transit, and cash being
processed.
As of December 31, 2007, we had cash and cash equivalents,
cash in machine or in transit, and cash being processed totaling
$196.6 million, which consisted of cash and cash
equivalents immediately available to fund our operations of
$18.5 million, cash in machine or in transit of
$78.1 million and cash being processed of
$100.0 million (which relates to our partner payable
liability as recorded in accrued liabilities payable to
retailers in the Consolidated Balance Sheet). Working
capital was $104.7 million as of December 31, 2007,
compared with $73.1 million as of December 31, 2006.
The increase in working capital was primarily the result of the
recognition of the receivable related to our telecommunication
fee refund and the timing of payments to our vendors and
retailers.
30
Net cash provided by operating activities was $58.1 million
for the year ended December 31, 2007, compared to net cash
provided by operating activities of $115.4 million for the
year ended December 31, 2006. Cash provided by operating
activities decreased primarily as a result of cash used by our
operating assets and liabilities of $44.8 million for the
year ended December 31, 2007 as compared to cash provided
by operating assets and liabilities of $20.3 for the year ended
December 31, 2006. Cash used by our operating assets and
liabilities increased mainly due to the timing of payments to
our retailers and the recognition of our telecommunication fee
refund that was recorded in 2007 but not collected until 2008.
This was offset by an increase in cash provided from operating
results net of non-cash transactions on our Consolidated Income
Statement of $7.8 million. The increase of
$7.8 million resulted mostly from the 2007 impairment and
excess inventory charges, increases in depreciation and other
expense and amortization of intangible assets acquired from
acquisitions.
Net cash used by investing activities for the year ended
December 31, 2007 was $99.3 million compared to
$89.0 million in the prior year period. In 2007 net
cash used by investing activities consisted of a promissory note
with Redbox of $10.0 million, acquisitions of subsidiaries
of $7.3 million and capital expenditures of
$84.3 million offset by proceeds from the sale of fixed
assets of $2.3 million. Comparatively, in 2006 net
cash used by investing activities consisted of net equity
investments of $12.1 million, acquisitions of subsidiaries
of $31.3 million and capital expenditures of
$45.9 million. The increase in capital expenditures
year-over-year is primarily a result of increased installation
of coin and DVD machines during the year, upgrades to our
machines, and other corporate infrastructure costs.
Net cash provided by financing activities for the year ended
December 31, 2007, was $58.3 million compared to net
cash used by financing activities of $25.8 million in the
prior year period. In 2007, net cash provided by financing
activities represented the borrowings on both our current and
prior credit facilities of $400.5 million, proceeds of
employee stock option exercises of $4.3 million and the
excess tax benefit from exercise of stock options of
$3.7 million, offset by cash used to make principal
payments on debt of $338.5 million (including a
$329.0 million early retirement of our prior credit
facility), to repurchase our common stock of $10.0 million
and financing costs associated with our current credit facility
of $1.7 million. In 2006, net cash provided by financing
activities represented the proceeds of employee stock option
exercises of $5.4 million and the excess tax benefit from
exercise of stock options of $1.0 million, offset by cash
used to repurchase our common stock of $8.0 million and
principal payments on debt of $24.2 million, including a
$16.9 million mandatory paydown under the terms of our
prior credit facility.
Equity
Investments
In 2005, we invested $20.0 million to obtain a 47.3%
interest in Redbox. In 2006, we invested an additional
$12.0 million related to a conditional consideration
agreement as certain targets were met; however, the percentage
of our ownership interest in Redbox did not change. In 2007, we
entered into a loan with Redbox in the amount of
$10.0 million bearing interest at 11% per annum. Interest
payments are first due on May 1, 2009 and then on each
three month period thereafter through the maturity date of
May 1, 2010. The loan is recorded in Other Assets on the
Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2007.
On January 1, 2008, we exercised our option to acquire a
majority ownership interest in the voting equity of Redbox under
the terms of the LLC Interest Purchase Agreement dated
November 17, 2005. In conjunction with the option exercise
and payment of $5.1 million, our ownership interest
increased from 47.3% to 51.0%. Since our original investment in
Redbox, we have been accounting for our 47.3% ownership interest
under the equity method in our Consolidated Financial
Statements. Effective with the close of this transaction,
January 18, 2008, we will consolidate Redboxs
financial results into our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Credit
Facility
On November 20, 2007, we entered into a senior secured
revolving line of credit facility, which replaced a prior credit
facility, providing advances up to $400.0 million for
(i) revolving loans, (ii) swingline advances subject
to a sublimit of $25.0 million, and (iii) the issuance
of letters of credit in our behalf subject to a sublimit of
$50.0 million. We may, subject to applicable conditions,
request an increase in the revolving line of credit facility up
to an aggregate of an additional $50.0 million. Fees for
this facility of approximately $1.7 million are being
amortized
31
over the
5-year life
of the revolving line of credit facility. We amortize deferred
finance fees on a straight-line basis which approximates the
effective interest method. The credit facility matures on
November 20, 2012, at which time all outstanding borrowings
must be repaid and all outstanding letters of credit must have
been cash collateralized. Our obligations under the revolving
line of credit facility are secured by a first priority security
interest in substantially all of our assets and the assets of
our domestic subsidiaries, as well as a pledge of a substantial
portion of our subsidiaries capital stock. As of
December 31, 2007, our outstanding revolving line of credit
balance was $257.0 million.
Subject to applicable conditions, we may elect interest rates on
our revolving borrowings calculated by reference to (i) the
British Bankers Association LIBOR rate (the BBA LIBOR
Rate) fixed for given interest periods or (ii) Bank
of Americas prime rate (or, if greater, the average rate
on overnight federal funds plus one half of one percent) (the
Base Rate), plus a margin determined by our
consolidated leverage ratio. For swing line borrowings, we will
pay interest at the Base Rate, plus a margin determined by our
consolidated leverage ratio. For borrowings made with the BBA
LIBOR Rate, the margin ranges from 75 to 175 basis points,
while for borrowings made with the Base Rate, the margin ranges
from 0 to 50 basis points. As of December 31, 2007,
our weighted average interest rate on the revolving line of
credit facility was 6.3%.
The credit facility contains standard negative covenants and
restrictions on actions including, without limitation,
restrictions on indebtedness, liens, fundamental changes or
dispositions of our assets, payments of dividends or common
stock repurchases, capital expenditures, investments, and
mergers, dispositions and acquisitions, among other
restrictions. In addition, the credit agreement requires that we
meet certain financial covenants, ratios and tests, including
maintaining a maximum consolidated leverage ratio and a minimum
interest coverage ratio, as defined in the credit agreement. As
of December 31, 2007, we were in compliance with all
covenants.
Previous to November 20, 2007, we were a party to a credit
agreement entered into on July 7, 2004, with a syndicate of
lenders led by JPMorgan Chase Bank and Lehman Brothers, Inc. The
senior secured credit facility provided for advances totaling up
to $310.0 million, consisting of a $60.0 million
revolving credit facility and a $250.0 million term loan
facility. On November 20, 2007, all outstanding debt on
this facility was paid in full resulting in a charge totaling
$1.8 million for the write-off of deferred financing fees.
Under the terms of our current credit facility, we are permitted
to repurchase up to (i) $25.0 million of our common
stock plus (ii) proceeds received after November 20,
2007, from the issuance of new shares of capital stock under our
employee equity compensation plans. Subsequent to
November 20, 2007 and as of December 31, 2007, the
authorized cumulative proceeds received from option exercises or
other equity purchases under our equity compensation plans
totaled $0.3 million bringing the total authorized for
purchase under our credit facility to $25.3 million. After
taking into consideration our share repurchases of
$6.5 million subsequent to November 20, 2007, the
remaining amount authorized for repurchase under our credit
facility is $18.8 million as of December 31, 2007,
however we will not exceed our repurchase limit authorized by
the board of directors as outlined below.
Apart from our credit facility limitations, our board of
directors authorized the repurchase of up to $22.5 million
of our common stock plus additional shares equal to the
aggregate amount of net proceeds received after January 1,
2003, from our employee equity compensation plans. As of
December 31, 2007, this authorization allow us to
repurchase up to $15.0 million of our common stock.
As of December 31, 2007, we had six irrevocable standby
letters of credit that totaled $12.4 million. These standby
letters of credit, which expire at various times through
December 2008, are used to collateralize certain obligations to
third parties. Prior to and as of December 31, 2007, no
amounts have been or are outstanding under these standby letters
of credit.
We believe our existing cash, cash equivalents and amounts
available to us under our credit facility will be sufficient to
fund our cash requirements and capital expenditure needs for at
least the next 12 months. After that time, the extent of
additional financing needed, if any, will depend on the success
of our business. If we significantly increase installations
beyond planned levels or if coin-counting machine volumes
generated or entertainment services machine plays are lower than
historical levels, our cash needs may increase. Furthermore, our
future capital requirements will depend on a number of factors,
including cash required by future acquisitions, consumer use of
our services, the timing and number of machine installations,
the number of available installable machines, the type
32
and scope of service enhancements and the cost of developing
potential new product and service offerings and enhancements.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
As of December 31, 2007, off-balance sheet arrangements are
comprised of our operating leases and letters of credit
disclosed in Note 8 to our Consolidated Financial
Statements. We have no other off-balance sheet arrangements that
have had or are reasonably likely to have a material current or
future effect on our financial condition or Consolidated
Financial Statements.
Contractual
Obligations
The tables below summarize our contractual obligations and other
commercial commitments as of December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 1
|
|
|
1-3
|
|
|
4-5
|
|
|
After 5
|
|
Contractual Obligations
|
|
Total
|
|
|
year
|
|
|
years
|
|
|
years
|
|
|
years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt(1)
|
|
$
|
257,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
257,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital lease obligations(2)
|
|
|
15,084
|
|
|
|
7,166
|
|
|
|
7,482
|
|
|
|
436
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating leases(3)
|
|
|
13,974
|
|
|
|
4,959
|
|
|
|
5,813
|
|
|
|
2,988
|
|
|
|
214
|
|
Purchase obligations(4)
|
|
|
11,378
|
|
|
|
11,378
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset retirement obligations(5)
|
|
|
1,610
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,610
|
|
Liability for uncertain tax positions(6)
|
|
|
1,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual cash obligations
|
|
$
|
300,246
|
|
|
$
|
23,503
|
|
|
$
|
13,295
|
|
|
$
|
261,624
|
|
|
$
|
1,824
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Long-term debt does not include
contractual interest payments as they are variable in nature.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Capital lease obligations represent
gross minimum lease payments, which includes interest.
|
|
(3)
|
|
One of our lease agreements is a
triple net operating lease. Accordingly, we are responsible for
other obligations including, but not limited to, taxes,
insurance, utilities and maintenance as incurred.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Purchase obligations consist of
outstanding purchase orders issued in the ordinary course of our
business.
|
|
(5)
|
|
Asset retirement obligations
represent the fair value of a liability related to the machine
removal costs following contract expiration.
|
|
(6)
|
|
Liability for uncertain tax
positions represents amounts that we are contingently liable for
based on our tax positions which their respective statute of
limitations ends within 4 to 5 years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Commitment Expiration by Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 1
|
|
|
1-3
|
|
|
4-5
|
|
|
After 5
|
|
Other Commercial Commitments
|
|
Total
|
|
|
year
|
|
|
years
|
|
|
years
|
|
|
years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Letters of credit
|
|
$
|
12,428
|
|
|
$
|
12,428
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial commitments
|
|
$
|
12,428
|
|
|
$
|
12,428
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 7A.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
|
We are subject to the risk of fluctuating interest rates in the
normal course of business, primarily as a result of our credit
agreement with a syndicate of lenders led by Bank of America,
N.A. and investment activities that generally bear interest at
variable rates. Because our investments have maturities of three
months or less, and our credit facility interest rates are based
upon either the LIBOR, prime rate or base rate plus an
applicable margin, we believe that the risk of material loss is
low and that the carrying amount of these balances approximates
fair value.
Based on our outstanding revolving line of credit obligations of
$257.0 million as of December 31, 2007, an increase of
1.0% in interest rates over the next year would increase our
annualized interest expense by approximately $2.6 million;
a decrease of 1.0% in interest rates over the next year would
decrease our annualized interest expense by approximately
$2.6 million. Such potential increases or decreases are
based on certain simplified
33
assumptions, including an immediate, across-the-board increase
or decrease in the level of interest rates with no other
subsequent changes for the remainder of the periods.
We are further subject to the risk of foreign exchange rate
fluctuation in the normal course of business as a result of our
operations in the United Kingdom, Europe, Canada and Mexico.
|
|
Item 8.
|
Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data.
|
See Item 15 for an index to the financial statements and
supplementary data required by this item, which are included as
a separate section on page 36 and which are incorporated
herein by reference.
Supplemental
Quarterly Financial Information
The following table sets forth selected unaudited quarterly
financial information for the last eight quarters. This
information has been prepared on the same basis as our audited
Consolidated Financial Statements and includes, in the opinion
of management, all normal and recurring adjustments that
management considers necessary for a fair presentation of the
quarterly results for the periods. The operating results for any
quarter are not necessarily indicative of the results for future
periods. Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior
period balances to conform with the current year presentation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Month Periods Ended
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31,
|
|
|
Sept. 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
Dec. 31,
|
|
|
Sept. 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2007(1)
|
|
|
2007(2)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006(3)
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
Consolidated Statement of Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
133,314
|
|
|
$
|
143,291
|
|
|
$
|
137,356
|
|
|
$
|
132,336
|
|
|
$
|
138,047
|
|
|
$
|
140,036
|
|
|
$
|
130,327
|
|
|
$
|
126,032
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct operating
|
|
|
83,166
|
|
|
|
96,209
|
|
|
|
89,941
|
|
|
|
89,192
|
|
|
|
90,856
|
|
|
|
88,943
|
|
|
|
84,932
|
|
|
|
84,874
|
|
Operating taxes, net
|
|
|
1,946
|
|
|
|
(9,488
|
)
|
|
|
2,629
|
|
|
|
2,447
|
|
|
|
1,936
|
|
|
|
2,446
|
|
|
|
2,722
|
|
|
|
2,825
|
|
Marketing
|
|
|
2,009
|
|
|
|
5,650
|
|
|
|
2,614
|
|
|
|
1,626
|
|
|
|
5,481
|
|
|
|
4,626
|
|
|
|
3,389
|
|
|
|
924
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
1,070
|
|
|
|
1,397
|
|
|
|
1,345
|
|
|
|
1,341
|
|
|
|
1,155
|
|
|
|
1,457
|
|
|
|
1,393
|
|
|
|
1,241
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
13,857
|
|
|
|
15,685
|
|
|
|
13,404
|
|
|
|
12,247
|
|
|
|
13,033
|
|
|
|
13,984
|
|
|
|
12,594
|
|
|
|
11,366
|
|
Depreciation and other
|
|
|
14,724
|
|
|
|
15,100
|
|
|
|
14,549
|
|
|
|
14,468
|
|
|
|
13,272
|
|
|
|
13,410
|
|
|
|
13,295
|
|
|
|
12,859
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
1,962
|
|
|
|
1,813
|
|
|
|
1,817
|
|
|
|
1,739
|
|
|
|
1,722
|
|
|
|
1,661
|
|
|
|
1,510
|
|
|
|
1,327
|
|
Impairment and excess inventory charges
|
|
|
65,220
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from operations
|
|
|
(50,640
|
)
|
|
|
16,925
|
|
|
|
11,057
|
|
|
|
9,276
|
|
|
|
10,592
|
|
|
|
13,509
|
|
|
|
10,492
|
|
|
|
10,616
|
|
Interest income and other, net
|
|
|
292
|
|
|
|
1,808
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
487
|
|
|
|
420
|
|
|
|
471
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(4,605
|
)
|
|
|
(4,365
|
)
|
|
|
(4,125
|
)
|
|
|
(3,974
|
)
|
|
|
(3,910
|
)
|
|
|
(4,120
|
)
|
|
|
(3,986
|
)
|
|
|
(3,732
|
)
|
Income (loss) from equity investments and other
|
|
|
472
|
|
|
|
2,217
|
|
|
|
(1,101
|
)
|
|
|
(255
|
)
|
|
|
(118
|
)
|
|
|
(443
|
)
|
|
|
304
|
|
|
|
191
|
|
Early retirement of debt
|
|
|
(1,794
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(238
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes
|
|
|
(56,275
|
)
|
|
|
16,585
|
|
|
|
6,004
|
|
|
|
5,122
|
|
|
|
6,729
|
|
|
|
9,433
|
|
|
|
7,230
|
|
|
|
7,308
|
|
Income tax benefit (expense)
|
|
|
19,053
|
|
|
|
(7,520
|
)
|
|
|
(2,656
|
)
|
|
|
(2,566
|
)
|
|
|
(1,689
|
)
|
|
|
(4,144
|
)
|
|
|
(3,111
|
)
|
|
|
(3,129
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(37,222
|
)
|
|
$
|
9,065
|
|
|
$
|
3,348
|
|
|
$
|
2,556
|
|
|
$
|
5,040
|
|
|
$
|
5,289
|
|
|
$
|
4,119
|
|
|
$
|
4,179
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(1.34
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.33
|
|
|
$
|
0.12
|
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
$
|
0.18
|
|
|
$
|
0.19
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(1.34
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
|
$
|
0.12
|
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
$
|
0.18
|
|
|
$
|
0.19
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
In the fourth quarter of 2007, we
recorded an impairment and excess inventory charge which is more
fully described in Note 2 to our Consolidated Financial
Statements.
|
34
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
In the third quarter of 2007, we
recognized a telecommunication fee refund which is more fully
described in Note 2 and Note 17 to our Consolidated
Financial Statements.
|
|
(3)
|
|
In the second quarter of 2006, we
acquired CMT.
|
Seasonality
We have historically experienced seasonality in our revenues
with higher revenues in the second half of the year than in the
first half of the year. Our coin services generally experiences
its highest revenues in the third calendar quarter, followed by
the fourth calendar quarter, and relatively lower revenues in
the first half of the year. Our
e-payment
services (including money transfer) generally provides its
highest revenue in the fourth quarter. We have not experienced
significant seasonality in our entertainment services. We expect
our results of operations will continue to fluctuate as a result
of seasonal fluctuations and our revenue mix between relatively
higher margin coin and
e-payment
services and relatively lower margin entertainment services.
|
|
Item 9.
|
Changes
in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure.
|
None.
|
|
Item 9A.
|
Controls
and Procedures.
|
|
|
(i)
|
Disclosure
Controls and Procedures.
|
Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined under
Rule 13a-15(e)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Based on that
evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures
were effective as of December 31, 2007.
|
|
(ii)
|
Internal
Control Over Financial Reporting.
|
(a) Managements report on internal control over
financial reporting.
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term
is defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Rule 13a-15(f).
Under the supervision and with the participation of our
management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the
effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting
as of December 31, 2007 as required by the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934
Rule 13a-15(c).
In making this assessment, we used the criteria set forth in the
framework in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission. Based on our evaluation under the framework in
Internal Control-Integrated Framework, our management concluded
that our internal control over financial reporting was effective
as of December 31, 2007.
(b) Attestation report of the registered public
accounting firm.
The attestation report of KPMG LLP, our independent registered
public accounting firm, on the effectiveness of our internal
control over financial reporting is set forth on page 41.
(c) Changes in internal control over financial
reporting.
There was no change in our internal control over financial
reporting during our fourth fiscal quarter ended
December 31, 2007 that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control
over financial reporting.
|
|
Item 9B.
|
Other
Information.
|
None.
35
PART III
|
|
Item 10.
|
Directors,
Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.
|
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by
reference to the Proxy Statement relating to our 2008 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders.
|
|
Item 11.
|
Executive
Compensation.
|
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by
reference to the Proxy Statement relating to our 2008 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders.
|
|
Item 12.
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and
Related Stockholder Matters.
|
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by
reference to the Proxy Statement relating to our 2008 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders.
|
|
Item 13.
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director
Independence.
|
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by
reference to the Proxy Statement relating to our 2008 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders.
|
|
Item 14.
|
Principal
Accountant Fees and Services.
|
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by
reference to the Proxy Statement relating to our 2008 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders.
PART IV
|
|
Item 15.
|
Exhibits
and Financial Statement Schedules.
|
The financial statements required by this item are submitted in
a separate section beginning on page 41 of this Annual
Report.
(a)(1) Index to Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm KPMG LLP
|
|
|
41
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
|
43
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations
|
|
|
44
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity and
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
|
|
|
45
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
|
46
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
47
|
|
(a)(2) Index to Financial Statement Schedules
All schedules have been omitted because they are not applicable
or not required, or the required information is included in the
financial statements or notes thereto.
(a)(3) Exhibit Index:
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit Number
|
|
Description of Document
|
|
|
2
|
.1
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated May 23, 2004, by and
among Registrant, Sesame Mergeco, Inc., ACMI Holdings, Inc.,
American Coin Merchandising, Inc. and Wellspring Capital
Management LLC, as Stockholder Representative. (1)
|
|
2
|
.2
|
|
LLC Interest Purchase Agreement dated November 17, 2005 by
and among Redbox Automated Retail, LLC, McDonalds
Ventures, LLC and Registrant. (2)
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit Number
|
|
Description of Document
|
|
|
2
|
.3
|
|
Asset Purchase Agreement by and among The Amusement Factory,
L.L.C., Levine Investments Limited Partnership, American Coin
Merchandising, Inc., Adventure Vending Inc. and
Registrant. (3)
|
|
2
|
.4
|
|
Agreement for the Sale and Purchase of the Entire Issued Share
Capital of Travelex Money Transfer Limited dated April 30,
2006 by and among Travelex Limited, Registrant and Travelex
Group Limited. (22)
|
|
2
|
.5
|
|
Stock Purchase Agreement dated July 19, 2007 by and among
Coinstar
E-Payment
Services Inc., Jose Francisco Leon, Benjamin Knoll, Martin
Barrett, Frank Joseph Lawrence, David Mard and Robert
Duran. (31)
|
|
2
|
.6
|
|
First Amendment of Stock Purchase Agreement dated
January 1, 2008 by and among Coinstar
E-Payment
Services Inc., Jose Francisco Leon, Benjamin Knoll, Martin
Barrett, Frank Joseph Lawrence, David Mard and Robert
Duran. (35)
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation. (4)
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws. (33)
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Reference is made to Exhibits 3.1 through 3.2. (4)
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
Specimen Stock Certificate. (4)
|
|
4
|
.3
|
|
Second Amended and Restated Investor Rights Agreement, dated
August 27, 1996, between Registrant and certain investors,
as amended October 22, 1996. (4)
|
|
4
|
.4
|
|
Rights Agreement dated as of November 12, 1998 between
Registrant and American Securities Transfer and Trust,
Inc. (5)
|
|
4
|
.5
|
|
Certificate of Designation of Series A Preferred Stock.
Reference is made to Exhibit A of Exhibit 4.4. (5)
|
|
4
|
.6
|
|
Form of Rights Certificate. Reference is made to Exhibit B
of Exhibit 4.4. (5)
|
|
10
|
.1*
|
|
1997 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. (4)
|
|
10
|
.2*
|
|
Amended and Restated 1997 Non-Employee Directors Stock
Option Plan. (6)
|
|
10
|
.3*
|
|
Outside Directors Deferred Compensation Plan. (7)
|
|
10
|
.4*
|
|
1997 Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan. (8)
|
|
10
|
.5*
|
|
2000 Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan. (9)
|
|
10
|
.6*
|
|
Executive Deferred Compensation Plan. (7)
|
|
10
|
.7*
|
|
Form of 1997 Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan Stock
Option Grant Notice for option grants made prior to
December 12, 2005. (10)
|
|
10
|
.8*
|
|
Form of 1997 Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan Stock
Option Grant Notice for option grants made after
December 12, 2005 to the CEO or CFO. (20)
|
|
10
|
.9*
|
|
Form of 1997 Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan Stock
Option Grant Notice for option grants made after
December 12, 2005 to plan participants other than the CEO
or CFO. (20)
|
|
10
|
.10*
|
|
Form of 2000 Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan Stock
Option Grant Notice. (10)
|
|
10
|
.11*
|
|
Form of Indemnity Agreement between Registrant and its Executive
Officers and Directors. (4)
|
|
10
|
.12*
|
|
Form of Release Agreement. (11)
|
|
10
|
.13*
|
|
Summary of 2007 Base Salaries for 2006 Named Executive
Officers. (30)
|
|
10
|
.14*
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Award under the 1997 Amended and
Restated Equity Incentive Plan for awards made prior to
December 12, 2005. (12)
|
|
10
|
.15*
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Award under the 1997 Amended and
Restated Equity Incentive Plan for awards made after
December 12, 2005 to the CEO or CFO. (20)
|
|
10
|
.16*
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Award under the 1997 Amended and
Restated Equity Incentive Plan for awards made after
December 12, 2005 to plan participants other than the CEO
or CFO. (20)
|
|
10
|
.17*
|
|
Summary of Director Fees. (32)
|
|
10
|
.18
|
|
Credit Agreement, dated July 7, 2004, among Registrant, as
Borrower, Bank of America, N.A., Keybank National Association
and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Documentation
Agents, Lehman Commercial Paper, Inc., as Syndication Agent, and
JPMorgan Chase Bank, as Administrative Agent. (1)
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit Number
|
|
Description of Document
|
|
|
10
|
.19
|
|
First Amendment, dated December 21, 2004, to the Credit
Agreement, dated July 7, 2004, among Registrant, as
Borrower, Bank of America, N.A., Keybank National Association
and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Documentation
Agents, Lehman Commercial Paper, Inc., as Syndication Agent, and
JPMorgan Chase Bank, as Administrative Agent. (13)
|
|
10
|
.20
|
|
Lease Agreement, dated January 1, 2004, by and between
Registrant and EOP Operating Limited Partnership. (14)
|
|
10
|
.21
|
|
Industrial Building Lease, dated October 24, 2002, by and
between FCF Properties, LLC and American Coin Merchandising,
Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Registrant, as amended
June 6, 2003. (15)
|
|
10
|
.22*
|
|
Employment Agreement between Brian V. Turner and Registrant
dated August 5, 2005. (16)
|
|
10
|
.23*
|
|
Change of Control Agreement between Brian V. Turner and
Registrant dated August 5, 2005. (16)
|
|
10
|
.24*
|
|
Employment Agreement between David W. Cole and Registrant dated
January 1, 2004. (14)
|
|
10
|
.25*
|
|
Stock Option Agreement, Grant to Chief Executive Officer dated
October 8, 2001. (17)
|
|
10
|
.26
|
|
Voting Agreement between Levine Investments Limited Partnership
and Registrant dated November 1, 2005. (18)
|
|
10
|
.27*
|
|
2006 Incentive Compensation Plan. (19)
|
|
10
|
.28
|
|
Lease Agreement dated November 1, 2005, by and between Van
Nuys Airpark Building 5, LLC and Adventure Vending Inc., a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Registrant. (21)
|
|
10
|
.29
|
|
Lease Agreement dated November 1, 2005, by and between Van
Nuys Airpark Building 5, LLC and Adventure Vending Inc., a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Registrant. (21)
|
|
10
|
.30
|
|
Lease Agreement dated November 1, 2005, by and between
Levine & Riggle Rental Company Limited Partnership and
Adventure Vending Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of
Registrant. (21)
|
|
10
|
.31
|
|
Transitional Services Agreement dated May 31, 2006 between
Travelex Limited, Travelex Money Transfer Limited and
Registrant. (23)
|
|
10
|
.32*
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Award under the 1997 Amended And
Restated Equity Incentive Plan for Awards Made to Nonemployee
Directors. (24)
|
|
10
|
.33*
|
|
Form of Stock Option Grant under 1997 Amended and Restated
Equity Incentive Plan For Grants Made to Nonemployee
Directors. (24)
|
|
10
|
.34*
|
|
Employment Agreement effective as of July 7, 2006, between
Randall J. Fagundo and Registrant. (25)
|
|
10
|
.35*
|
|
Amended and Restated Equity Grant Program for Nonemployee
Directors under the Coinstar, Inc. 1997 Amended and Restated
Equity Incentive Plan. (26)
|
|
10
|
.36*
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Award for CEO or CFO for
Performance-Based Awards Made to the CEO or CFO under the 1997
Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan. (27)
|
|
10
|
.37*
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Award for Participants Other than the
CEO or CFO for Performance-Based Awards to Plan Participants
Other than the CEO or CFO under the 1997 Amended and Restated
Equity Incentive Plan. (27)
|
|
10
|
.38*
|
|
2007 Incentive Compensation Plan. (28)
|
|
10
|
.39*
|
|
Form of Change of Control Agreement. (29)
|
|
10
|
.40*
|
|
Amended and Restated Equity Grant Program for Nonemployee
Directors under the Coinstar, Inc. 1997 Amended and Restated
Equity Incentive Plan. (32)
|
|
10
|
.41
|
|
Credit Agreement, dated November 20, 2007, among Coinstar,
Inc., as borrower, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative
agent, swing line lender, and letter of credit issuer, Banc of
America Securities LLC and J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., as
joint lead arrangers and joint book managers, JPMorgan Chase
Bank, N.A., as syndication agent, Keybank National Association,
U.S. Bank National Association and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as
co-documentation agents, and the other lenders party
thereto. (34)
|
|
21
|
.1
|
|
Subsidiaries.
|
|
23
|
.1
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm KPMG LLP.
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
Section 302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
Section 302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit Number
|
|
Description of Document
|
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
32
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Indicates a management contract or
compensatory plan or arrangement.
|
|
(1)
|
|
Incorporated by reference to the
Registrants
Form 8-K
filed on July 7, 2004 (File
Number 000-22555).
|
|
(2)
|
|
Incorporated by reference to the
Registrants
Form 8-K
filed on November 18, 2005 (File
Number 000-22555).
|
|
(3)
|
|
Incorporated by reference to the
Registrants
Form 8-K
filed on October 19, 2005 (File
Number 000-22555).
|
|
(4)
|
|
Incorporated by reference to the
Registrants Registration Statement on
Form S-4
filed on August 8, 1997
(No. 333-33233).
|
|
(5)
|
|
Incorporated by reference to the
Registrants Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 1998 (File
Number 000-22555).
|
|
(6)
|
|
Incorporated by reference to the
Registrants Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2000 (File
Number 000-22555).
|
|
(7)
|
|
Incorporated by reference to the
Registrants Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 2002 (File
Number 000-22555).
|
|
(8)
|
|
Incorporated by reference to
Appendix A the Registrants Definitive Proxy Statement
on Form DEF 14A filed on April 27, 2008 (File
Number 000-22555).
|
|
(9)
|
|
Incorporated by reference to the
Registrants Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 2003 (File
Number 000-22555).
|
|
(10)
|
|
Incorporated by reference to the
Registrants Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 2005 (File
Number 000-22555).
|
|
(11)
|
|
Incorporated by reference to the
Registrants
Form 8-K
filed on June 22, 2001 (File
Number 000-22555).
|
|
(12)
|
|
Incorporated by reference to the
Registrants
Form 8-K
filed on January 20, 2005 (File
Number 000-22555).
|
|
(13)
|
|
Incorporated by reference to the
Registrants
Form 8-K
filed on December 22, 2004 (File
Number 000-22555).
|
|
(14)
|
|
Incorporated by reference to the
Registrants Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2003 (File
Number 000-22555).
|
|
(15)
|
|
Incorporated by reference to the
Registrants
Form 8-K
filed on December 6, 2004 (File
Number 000-22555).
|
|
(16)
|
|
Incorporated by reference to the
Registrants
Form 8-K
filed on August 10, 2005 (File
Number 000-22555).
|
|
(17)
|
|
Incorporated by reference to the
Registrants Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2001 (File
Number 000-22555).
|
|
(18)
|
|
Incorporated by reference to the
Registrants
Form 8-K
filed on November 2, 2005 (File
Number 000-22555).
|
|
(19)
|
|
Incorporated by reference to the
Registrants
Form 8-K
filed on February 16, 2006 (File
Number 000-22555).
|
|
(20)
|
|
Incorporated by reference to the
Registrants Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2005 (File
Number 000-22555).
|
|
(21)
|
|
Incorporated by reference to the
Registrants Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 2006 (File
Number 000-22555).
|
|
(22)
|
|
Incorporated by reference to the
Registrants
Form 8-K
filed on May 4, 2006 (File
Number 000-22555).
|
|
(23)
|
|
Incorporated by reference to the
Registrants
Form 8-K
filed on June 6, 2006 (File
Number 000-22555).
|
|
(24)
|
|
Incorporated by reference to the
Registrants
Form 8-K
filed on June 14, 2006 (File
Number 000-22555).
|
|
(25)
|
|
Incorporated by reference to the
Registrants
Form 8-K
filed on July 5, 2006 (File
Number 000-22555).
|
|
(26)
|
|
Incorporated by reference to the
Registrants Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 2006 (File
Number 000-22555).
|
|
(27)
|
|
Incorporated by reference to the
Registrants
Form 8-K
filed on February 6, 2007 (File
Number 000-22555).
|
|
(28)
|
|
Incorporated by reference to the
Registrants
Form 8-K
filed on February 8, 2007 (File
Number 000-22555).
|
|
(29)
|
|
Incorporated by reference to the
Registrants
Form 8-K
filed on March 7, 2007 (File
Number 000-22555).
|
|
(30)
|
|
Incorporated by reference to the
Registrants Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006 (File
Number 000-22555).
|
|
(31)
|
|
Incorporated by reference to the
Registrants
Form 8-K
filed on July 25, 2007 (File
Number 000-22555).
|
|
(32)
|
|
Incorporated by reference to the
Registrants Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 2007 (File
Number 000-22555).
|
|
(33)
|
|
Incorporated by reference to the
Registrants
Form 8-K
filed on October 19, 2007 (File
Number 000-22555).
|
|
(34)
|
|
Incorporated by reference to the
Registrants
Form 8-K
filed on November 26, 2007 (File
Number 000-22555).
|
|
(35)
|
|
Incorporated by reference to the
Registrants
Form 8-K
filed on January 7, 2008 (File
Number 000-22555).
|
39
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
Coinstar, Inc.
Brian V. Turner
Chief Financial Officer
Date: February 28, 2008
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons
on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ David
W. Cole
David
W. Cole
|
|
Chief Executive Officer and Director
|
|
February 28, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Brian
V. Turner
Brian
V. Turner
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
February 28, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Richard
C. Deck
Richard
C. Deck
|
|
Chief Accounting Officer
|
|
February 28, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Keith
D. Grinstein
Keith
D. Grinstein
|
|
Chairman of the Board
|
|
February 28, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Deborah
L. Bevier
Deborah
L. Bevier
|
|
Director
|
|
February 28, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ David
M. Eskenazy
David
M. Eskenazy
|
|
Director
|
|
February 28, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ R.
Michael Rouleau
R.
Michael Rouleau
|
|
Director
|
|
February 28, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Robert
D. Sznewajs
Robert
D. Sznewajs
|
|
Director
|
|
February 28, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Ronald
B. Woodard
Ronald
B. Woodard
|
|
Director
|
|
February 28, 2008
|
40
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Coinstar, Inc.:
We have audited Coinstar, Inc.s (the Company)
internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2007, based on criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO). The Companys management is responsible for
maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting
and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting, included in the accompanying
managements report on internal control over financial
reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the
Companys internal control over financial reporting based
on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk
that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on
the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We
believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, Coinstar, Inc. and subsidiaries maintained, in
all material respects, effective internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2007, based on criteria
established in Internal Control Integrated Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission (COSO).
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
consolidated balance sheets of Coinstar, Inc. as of
December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders equity and
comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007, and
our report dated February 25, 2008 expressed an unqualified
opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
Seattle, Washington
February 25, 2008
41
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Coinstar, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Coinstar, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of
December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders equity and
comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007.
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility
of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements
based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of Coinstar, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2007, in conformity
with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004),
Share-Based Payment.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States),
Coinstar, Inc.s internal control over financial reporting
as of December 31, 2007, based on criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO), and our report dated February 25, 2008 expressed an
unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Companys
internal control over financial reporting.
Seattle, Washington
February 25, 2008
42
COINSTAR,
INC.
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
(in
thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
CURRENT ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
18,497
|
|
|
$
|
18,687
|
|
Cash in machine or in transit
|
|
|
78,097
|
|
|
|
63,740
|
|
Cash being processed
|
|
|
99,998
|
|
|
|
95,737
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of
$1,489 and $1,050 at December 31, 2007 and 2006,
respectively
|
|
|
49,809
|
|
|
|
21,339
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
33,360
|
|
|
|
39,334
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
3,459
|
|
|
|
17,775
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
18,747
|
|
|
|
13,371
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
301,967
|
|
|
|
269,983
|
|
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET
|
|
|
146,041
|
|
|
|
160,962
|
|
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES
|
|
|
16,447
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
OTHER ASSETS
|
|
|
15,150
|
|
|
|
3,807
|
|
EQUITY INVESTMENTS
|
|
|
33,052
|
|
|
|
31,259
|
|
INTANGIBLE ASSETS, NET
|
|
|
34,457
|
|
|
|
43,121
|
|
GOODWILL
|
|
|
221,459
|
|
|
|
208,917
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS
|
|
$
|
768,573
|
|
|
$
|
718,083
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
49,829
|
|
|
$
|
57,536
|
|
Accrued liabilities payable to retailers
|
|
|
99,998
|
|
|
|
95,737
|
|
Other accrued liabilities
|
|
|
40,911
|
|
|
|
35,693
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt and capital lease obligations
|
|
|
6,505
|
|
|
|
7,883
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
197,243
|
|
|
|
196,849
|
|
LONG-TERM DEBT, CAPITAL LEASE OBLIGATIONS AND OTHER
|
|
|
266,146
|
|
|
|
192,381
|
|
DEFERRED TAX LIABILITY
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
7,488
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES
|
|
|
463,443
|
|
|
|
396,718
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value Authorized,
5,000,000 shares; no shares issued and outstanding at
December 31, 2007 and 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value Authorized,
45,000,000 shares; 29,665,125 and 29,383,150 issued and
27,739,044 and 27,816,011 shares outstanding at
December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively
|
|
|
354,509
|
|
|
|
343,229
|
|
(Accumulated deficit) retained earnings
|
|
|
(16,784
|
)
|
|
|
5,469
|
|
Treasury stock
|
|
|
(40,831
|
)
|
|
|
(30,806
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
8,236
|
|
|
|
3,473
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
305,130
|
|
|
|
321,365
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
$
|
768,573
|
|
|
$
|
718,083
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
43
COINSTAR,
INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in
thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
REVENUE
|
|
$
|
546,297
|
|
|
$
|
534,442
|
|
|
$
|
459,739
|
|
EXPENSES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct operating
|
|
|
358,508
|
|
|
|
349,605
|
|
|
|
304,594
|
|
Operating taxes, net
|
|
|
(2,466
|
)
|
|
|
9,929
|
|
|
|
8,705
|
|
Marketing
|
|
|
11,899
|
|
|
|
14,420
|
|
|
|
10,748
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
5,153
|
|
|
|
5,246
|
|
|
|
5,716
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
55,193
|
|
|
|
50,977
|
|
|
|
32,488
|
|
Depreciation and other
|
|
|
58,841
|
|
|
|
52,836
|
|
|
|
45,347
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
7,331
|
|
|
|
6,220
|
|
|
|
4,556
|
|
Impairment and excess inventory charges
|
|
|
65,220
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from operations
|
|
|
(13,382
|
)
|
|
|
45,209
|
|
|
|
47,585
|
|
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income and other, net
|
|
|
2,348
|
|
|
|
1,543
|
|
|
|
1,477
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(17,069
|
)
|
|
|
(15,748
|
)
|
|
|
(12,916
|
)
|
Income (loss) from equity investments and other
|
|
|
1,333
|
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
353
|
|
Early retirement of debt
|
|
|
(1,794
|
)
|
|
|
(238
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes
|
|
|
(28,564
|
)
|
|
|
30,700
|
|
|
|
36,499
|
|
Income tax benefit (expense)
|
|
|
6,311
|
|
|
|
(12,073
|
)
|
|
|
(14,227
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET (LOSS) INCOME
|
|
$
|
(22,253
|
)
|
|
$
|
18,627
|
|
|
$
|
22,272
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET (LOSS) INCOME PER SHARE:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.80
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.67
|
|
|
$
|
0.86
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.80
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.66
|
|
|
$
|
0.86
|
|
WEIGHTED SHARES OUTSTANDING:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
27,805
|
|
|
|
27,686
|
|
|
|
25,767
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
27,805
|
|
|
|
28,028
|
|
|
|
26,033
|
|
See notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
44
COINSTAR,
INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(in thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained Earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
(Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Deficit)
|
|
|
Treasury Stock
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
BALANCE, December 31, 2004
|
|
|
25,227,487
|
|
|
$
|
282,046
|
|
|
$
|
(35,430
|
)
|
|
$
|
(22,783
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,313
|
|
|
$
|
226,146
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of shares under employee stock purchase
plan
|
|
|
82,454
|
|
|
|
989
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
989
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options, net
|
|
|
323,633
|
|
|
|
4,559
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,559
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
84,782
|
|
|
|
340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
340
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit on share-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,048
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,048
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity purchase of assets, net of issuance cost of $66
|
|
|
2,057,272
|
|
|
|
39,969
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,969
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,272
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,272
|
|
|
$
|
22,272
|
|
Short-term investments net of tax benefit of $4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments net of tax benefit of
$832
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,324
|
)
|
|
|
(1,324
|
)
|
|
|
(1,324
|
)
|
Interest rate hedges on long-term debt net of tax expense of $35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
20,996
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE, December 31, 2005
|
|
|
27,775,628
|
|
|
|
328,951
|
|
|
|
(13,158
|
)
|
|
|
(22,783
|
)
|
|
|
1,037
|
|
|
|
294,047
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options, net
|
|
|
310,840
|
|
|
|
5,368
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,368
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,258
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,258
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit on share-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
979
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
979
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity purchase of assets
|
|
|
63,468
|
|
|
|
1,673
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,673
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock purchase
|
|
|
(333,925
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,023
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,023
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,627
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,627
|
|
|
$
|
18,627
|
|
Short-term investments net of tax expense of $8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments net of tax expense of
$732
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,482
|
|
|
|
2,482
|
|
|
|
2,482
|
|
Interest rate hedges on long-term debt net of tax benefit of $34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
21,063
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE, December 31, 2006
|
|
|
27,816,011
|
|
|
|
343,229
|
|
|
|
5,469
|
|
|
|
(30,806
|
)
|
|
|
3,473
|
|
|
|
321,365
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options, net
|
|
|
218,229
|
|
|
|
4,232
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,232
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
63,746
|
|
|
|
6,421
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,421
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit on share-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
627
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
627
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock purchase
|
|
|
(358,942
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,025
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,025
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,253
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,253
|
)
|
|
$
|
(22,253
|
)
|
Short-term investments net of tax expense of $2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments net of tax expense of
$205
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,828
|
|
|
|
4,828
|
|
|
|
4,828
|
|
Interest rate hedges on long-term debt net of tax benefit of $44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(17,490
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE, December 31, 2007
|
|
|
27,739,044
|
|
|
$
|
354,509
|
|
|
$
|
(16,784
|
)
|
|
$
|
(40,831
|
)
|
|
$
|
8,236
|
|
|
$
|
305,130
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
45
COINSTAR,
INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(22,253
|
)
|
|
$
|
18,627
|
|
|
$
|
22,272
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile (loss) income from operations to net
cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and other
|
|
|
58,841
|
|
|
|
52,836
|
|
|
|
45,347
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
7,331
|
|
|
|
6,220
|
|
|
|
4,556
|
|
Amortization of deferred financing fees
|
|
|
712
|
|
|
|
760
|
|
|
|
785
|
|
Loss on early retirement of debt
|
|
|
1,794
|
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment and excess inventory charges
|
|
|
65,220
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash stock-based compensation
|
|
|
6,421
|
|
|
|
6,258
|
|
|
|
340
|
|
Excess tax benefit on share based awards
|
|
|
(3,764
|
)
|
|
|
(1,033
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(9,142
|
)
|
|
|
10,183
|
|
|
|
14,315
|
|
(Income) loss from equity investments
|
|
|
(1,624
|
)
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
(353
|
)
|
Return on equity investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
929
|
|
|
|
974
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(656
|
)
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
Cash (used) provided by changes in operating assets and
liabilities, net of effects of business acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(27,016
|
)
|
|
|
(8,464
|
)
|
|
|
(2,159
|
)
|
Inventory
|
|
|
(3,547
|
)
|
|
|
(9,253
|
)
|
|
|
2,920
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
(8,594
|
)
|
|
|
(3,138
|
)
|
|
|
(2,480
|
)
|
Other assets
|
|
|
(4,773
|
)
|
|
|
(444
|
)
|
|
|
172
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(7,624
|
)
|
|
|
25,507
|
|
|
|
880
|
|
Accrued liabilities payable to retailers
|
|
|
2,535
|
|
|
|
9,977
|
|
|
|
12,722
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
4,205
|
|
|
|
6,073
|
|
|
|
2,791
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
58,066
|
|
|
|
115,380
|
|
|
|
103,123
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property and equipment
|
|
|
(84,318
|
)
|
|
|
(45,867
|
)
|
|
|
(43,905
|
)
|
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(7,249
|
)
|
|
|
(31,254
|
)
|
|
|
(20,832
|
)
|
Equity investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,109
|
)
|
|
|
(20,327
|
)
|
Loan to equity investee
|
|
|
(10,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of fixed assets
|
|
|
2,294
|
|
|
|
254
|
|
|
|
432
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used by investing activities
|
|
|
(99,273
|
)
|
|
|
(88,976
|
)
|
|
|
(84,632
|
)
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal payments on long-term debt, revolver loan and capital
lease obligations
|
|
|
(338,543
|
)
|
|
|
(24,209
|
)
|
|
|
(3,762
|
)
|
Borrowings on previous and current credit facilities
|
|
|
400,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing costs associated with revolving line of credit
|
|
|
(1,692
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess tax benefit on share based awards
|
|
|
3,764
|
|
|
|
1,033
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
(10,025
|
)
|
|
|
(8,023
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
|
|
|
4,281
|
|
|
|
5,357
|
|
|
|
5,548
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities
|
|
|
58,285
|
|
|
|
(25,842
|
)
|
|
|
1,786
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
|
|
|
1,350
|
|
|
|
2,335
|
|
|
|
(1,797
|
)
|
NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, CASH IN MACHINE OR IN
TRANSIT, AND CASH BEING PROCESSED
|
|
|
18,428
|
|
|
|
2,897
|
|
|
|
18,480
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, CASH IN MACHINE OR IN TRANSIT, AND
CASH BEING PROCESSED:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of period
|
|
|
178,164
|
|
|
|
175,267
|
|
|
|
156,787
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period
|
|
$
|
196,592
|
|
|
$
|
178,164
|
|
|
$
|
175,267
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for interest
|
|
$
|
18,901
|
|
|
$
|
14,795
|
|
|
$
|
11,516
|
|
Cash paid during the period for income taxes
|
|
|
3,480
|
|
|
|
1,982
|
|
|
|
1,089
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING
ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of vehicles financed by capital lease obligations
|
|
$
|
9,700
|
|
|
$
|
13,811
|
|
|
$
|
2,280
|
|
Common stock issued in conjuction with acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,673
|
|
|
|
39,969
|
|
Accrued acquisition costs
|
|
|
1,051
|
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
46
COINSTAR,
INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007, 2006, AND 2005
|
|
NOTE 1:
|
ORGANIZATION
AND BUSINESS
|
Description of company: Incorporated as a
Delaware company in 1993, Coinstar is a multi-national company
offering a range of
4th Walltm
solutions for retailers storefronts consisting of
self-service coin counting, electronic payment
(e-payment)
services such as money transfer services, stored value cards,
payroll cards, prepaid debit cards and prepaid wireless products
via point-of-sale terminals and non-coin-counting kiosks, and
entertainment services such as skill-crane machines, bulk
vending machines and kiddie rides. In addition, we offer
self-service DVD kiosks where consumers can rent or purchase
movies. Our services, in one form or another, are currently
offered in supermarkets, mass merchandisers, warehouse clubs,
drugstores, universities, shopping malls and convenience stores
in the United States, Canada, Mexico, Puerto Rico, the United
Kingdom and other countries. As of December 31, 2007, we
had a total of approximately 15,400 coin-counting machines
installed, over 280,000 entertainment services machines
installed, over 17,500 locations where our point-of-sale
terminals were installed and over 400 non-coin-counting kiosks
installed.
|
|
NOTE 2:
|
SUMMARY
OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
|
Principles of consolidation: The accompanying
Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of
Coinstar, Inc., our wholly-owned subsidiaries and other entities
in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) Interpretation No. 46 (revised December
2003), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities
(FIN 46R). All significant intercompany
balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Use of estimates: The preparation of financial
statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America (GAAP)
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the reporting period. These judgments are
difficult as matters that are inherently uncertain directly
impact their valuation and accounting. Actual results may vary
from managements estimates and assumptions.
Cash in machine or in transit and cash being
processed: Cash in machine or in transit
represents coin residing or estimated in our coin-counting or
entertainment machines, cash being processed by carriers, cash
in our cash registers and cash deposits in transit. Cash being
processed represents cash which we are obligated to use to
settle our accrued liabilities payable to retailers.
Securities available-for-sale: Our investments
are classified as available-for-sale and are stated at fair
value. Our available-for-sale securities have maturities of one
year or less and are reported at fair value based on quoted
market prices and are included in the balance sheet caption
prepaid expenses and other current assets. Changes
in unrealized gains and losses are reported as a separate
component of accumulated other comprehensive income.
Accounts receivable: Accounts receivable
represents receivables, net of allowances for doubtful accounts.
The allowance for doubtful accounts reflects our best estimate
of probable losses inherent in the accounts receivable balance.
We determine the allowance based on known troubled accounts,
historical experience and other currently available evidence.
When a specific account is deemed uncollectible, the account is
written off against the allowance. In 2007, the amount expensed
for uncollectible accounts was approximately $361,000 and the
amount charged against the allowance was $105,000. In 2006, the
amount expensed for uncollectible accounts was approximately
$433,000 and the amount charged against the allowance was
$500,000.
Inventory: Inventory, which consists primarily
of plush toys and other products dispensed from our
entertainment services machines, is stated at the lower of cost
or market. The cost of inventory includes mainly the cost of
materials, and to a lesser extent, labor, overhead and freight.
Cost is determined using the average cost method. Inventory,
which is considered finished goods, consists of purchased items
ready for resale or use in vending operations. Also included in
inventory are prepaid airtime, prepaid phones, prepaid phone
cards and DVDs; cost is determined using
first-in-first-out
method. In 2007, we wrote-off approximately $4.7 million of
excess
47
inventory in connection with an agreement reached with one of
our largest retailers, Wal-Mart. The write-off is discussed
further in the impairment of long-lived assets
policy note below.
Property and equipment: Property and equipment
are stated at cost, net of accumulated depreciation.
Expenditures that extend the life, increase the capacity, or
improve the efficiency of property and equipment are
capitalized, while expenditures for repairs and maintenance are
expensed as incurred. Depreciation is recognized using the
straight-line method over the following approximate useful lives.
|
|
|
|
|
Useful Life
|
|
Coin-counting and
e-payment
machines
|
|
5 years
|
Entertainment service machines
|
|
3 to 10 years
|
Vending machines
|
|
3 to 5 years
|
Computers
|
|
3 years
|
Office furniture and equipment
|
|
5 years
|
Leased vehicles
|
|
lease term
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
shorter of lease term or useful
life of improvement
|
Equity investments: In 2005, we invested
$20.0 million to obtain a 47.3% interest in Redbox
Automated Retail, LLC (Redbox). In 2006, we invested
an additional $12.0 million related to a conditional
consideration agreement as certain targets were met; however,
the percentage of our ownership interest in Redbox did not
change. In 2007, we entered into a loan with Redbox in the
amount of $10.0 million bearing interest at 11% per annum.
Interest payments are first due on May 1, 2009 and then on
each three month period thereafter through the maturity date of
May 1, 2010. The loan is recorded in Other Assets on the
Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2007.
On January 1, 2008, we exercised our option to acquire a
majority ownership interest in the voting equity of Redbox under
the terms of the LLC Interest Purchase Agreement dated
November 17, 2005. In conjunction with the option exercise
and payment of $5.1 million, our ownership interest
increased from 47.3% to 51.0%. Since our original investment in
Redbox, we have been accounting for our 47.3% ownership interest
under the equity method in our Consolidated Financial
Statements. Effective with the close of this transaction,
January 18, 2008, we will consolidate Redboxs
financial results into our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Purchase price allocations: In connection with
our acquisitions, we have allocated the respective purchase
prices plus transaction costs to the estimated fair values of
assets acquired and liabilities assumed. These purchase price
allocations were based on our estimates of fair values.
Adjustments to our purchase price allocation estimates are made
based on our final analysis of the fair value during the
allocation period, which is within one year of the purchase date.
Goodwill and intangible assets: Goodwill
represents the excess of cost over the estimated fair value of
net assets acquired, which is not being amortized. We test
goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level on an annual
or more frequent basis as determined necessary. FASB Statement
No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
(SFAS 142) requires a two-step goodwill
impairment test whereby the first step, used to identify
potential impairment, compares the fair value of a reporting
unit with its carrying amount including goodwill. If the fair
value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill
of the reporting unit is considered not impaired and the second
test is not performed. The second step of the impairment test is
performed when required and compares the implied fair value of
the reporting unit goodwill with the carrying amount of that
goodwill. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit goodwill
exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill, an impairment
loss shall be recognized in an amount equal to that excess.
As of December 31, 2007, we have two reporting units; North
American and International. Based on the annual goodwill test
for impairment we performed for the years ended
December 31, 2007 and 2006, we determined there was no
impairment of our goodwill. There was no goodwill impairment
associated with the asset group that had the impairment charge
described below as that asset group is not a reporting unit as
defined by SFAS 142.
48
Our intangible assets are comprised primarily of retailer
relationships acquired in connection with our acquisitions
through the end of 2007. We used expectations of future cash
flows to estimate the fair value of the acquired retailer
relationships. We amortize our intangible assets on a
straight-line basis over their expected useful lives which range
between 1 and 40 years.
Patent costs: Costs to successfully defend a
challenge to our patents are capitalized. Costs which relate to
an unsuccessful outcome are charged to expense.
Impairment of long-lived assets: Long-lived
assets, such as property and equipment and purchased intangibles
subject to amortization, are reviewed for impairment at least
annually or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate
that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.
Factors that would indicate potential impairment include, but
are not limited to, significant decreases in the market value of
the long-lived asset(s), a significant change in the long-lived
assets physical condition and operating or cash flow
losses associated with the use of the long-lived asset.
Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a
comparison of the carrying amount of an asset group to the
estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be
generated by the asset group. If the carrying amount of an asset
group exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment
charge is recognized in the amount by which the carrying amount
of the asset group exceeds the fair value of the asset group.
While we continue to review and analyze many factors that can
impact our business in the future, our analyses are subjective
and are based on conditions existing at, and trends leading up
to, the time the estimates and assumptions are made. Actual
results could differ materially from these estimates and
assumptions.
Prior to December 31, 2007, Wal-Mart management expressed
its intent to reset and optimize its store entrances. In
February 2008, we reached an agreement with Wal-Mart to
significantly expand our coin-counting machines and our DVD
kiosk locations over the next 12 to 18 months. In
conjunction with the expansion, we will be removing
approximately 50% of our cranes, bulk heads, and kiddie rides
from our existing Wal-Mart locations. This decision, along with
other contract terminations or decisions to scale-back the
number of entertainment machines with other retail partners as
well as macro-economic trends negatively affecting the
entertainment service industry, resulted in excess equipment and
inventory. As a result, we recorded a non-cash impairment charge
of $65.2 million as of December 31, 2007 related to an
asset group that includes this equipment and certain intangible
assets. Of this amount, $52.6 million relates to the
impairment of these cranes, bulk heads and kiddie rides,
$7.9 million relates to the impairment of certain
intangible assets and $4.7 million relates to the write-off
of excess inventory. We estimated the fair values of these
assets using discounted cash flows, or liquidation value for
certain assets, which we considered an appropriate method in the
circumstance.
Settlement of liabilities: In accordance with
FASB Statement No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and
Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities
(SFAS 140), we consider liabilities to be
extinguished when the debtor pays or is legally released from
the obligation. During the first quarter of 2007, the company
reversed liabilities totaling $870,000 in accordance with
SFAS 140.
Revenue recognition: We recognize revenue as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Coin-counting revenue is recognized at the time the
consumers coins are counted by our coin-counting machines;
|
|
|
|
Entertainment services revenue is recognized at the time cash is
deposited in our machines. Cash deposited in the machines that
has not yet been collected is referred to as cash in machine and
is estimated at period end and reported on the balance sheet as
cash in machine or in transit. This estimate is based on the
average daily revenue per machine, multiplied by the number of
days since the coin in the machine has been collected. The
estimated value of our entertainment services cash in machine
was approximately $8.4 million and $7.1 million as of
December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively;
|
|
|
|
E-payment
services revenue is recognized at the point of sale based on our
commissions earned, net of retailer fees. Money transfer revenue
is recognized at the time the customer completes the transaction.
|
Fees paid to retailers: Fees paid to retailers
relate to the amount we pay our retailers for the benefit of
placing our machines in their stores and their agreement to
provide certain services on our behalf to our customers. The fee
is generally calculated as a percentage of each coin-counting
transaction or as a percentage of our entertainment and
49
DVD revenues and is recorded in our consolidated income
statement under the caption direct operating
expenses. The fee arrangements are based on our
negotiations and evaluation of certain factors with the
retailers such as total revenue,
e-payment
capabilities, long-term non-cancelable contracts, installation
of our machines in high traffic
and/or urban
or rural locations, new product commitments, co-op marketing
incentive, or other criteria. We recognize this expense at the
time we recognize the associated revenue from each of our
customer transactions. This expense is recorded on a
straight-line basis as a percentage of revenue based on
estimated annual volumes. In certain instances, we prepay
amounts to our entertainment services retailers, which are
expensed over the contract term. The expense is included in
depreciation and other in the accompanying consolidated
statements of operations and cash flows.
Operating taxes, net: Taxes related to
operating our business are recorded in operating taxes, net on
the consolidated statement of operations. Such taxes include
property taxes, sales and use taxes, and franchise taxes and do
not include income taxes. During the third quarter of 2007,
operating taxes, net included a telecommunication fee refund in
the amount of $11.8 million as a result of an Internal
Revenue Service ruling that telecommunication fees paid during
the period of March 1, 2003 through July 31, 2006 were
improperly collected by the United States government. The
$11.8 million represents the refund amount as filed on our
fiscal year 2006 federal income tax return. This
telecommunication fee refund, along with the $5.5 million
amount received by us on behalf of our equity investment related
party and accrued interest totaling $17.6 million is
included in accounts receivable, net as of December 31,
2007. As discussed in Note 17, this related party amount of
the receivable resulted in a payable to the related party. In
February 2008, we received the refund in the amount that we
estimated.
Fair value of financial instruments: The
carrying amounts for cash and cash equivalents, our receivables
and our payables approximate fair value, which is the amount for
which the instrument could be exchanged in a current transaction
between willing parties. The fair value of our revolving line of
credit approximates its carrying amounts.
Foreign currency translation: The functional
currencies of our International subsidiaries are the British
Pound Sterling for Coinstar Limited in the United Kingdom and
the Euro for CMT. We translate assets and liabilities related to
these operations to U.S. dollars at the exchange rate in
effect at the date of the consolidated balance sheet; we convert
revenues and expenses into U.S. dollars using the average
monthly exchange rates. Translation gains and losses are
reported as a separate component of accumulated other
comprehensive income.
Stock-based compensation: Effective
January 1, 2006, we adopted the fair value recognition
provisions of FASB Statement No. 123 (revised 2004),
Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123R) using the
modified prospective transition method. Under this
transition method, compensation expense recognized includes the
estimated fair value of stock options granted on and subsequent
to January 1, 2006, based on the grant date fair value
estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123R,
and the estimated fair value of the portion vesting in the
period for options granted prior to, but not vested as of
January 1, 2006, based on the grant date fair value
estimated in accordance with the original provisions of FASB
Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation. In accordance with the modified-prospective
transition method, results for prior periods have not been
restated.
Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123R on January 1, 2006,
we accounted for stock-based awards to employees using the
intrinsic value method in accordance with APB Opinion
No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. All
options granted under the stock-based compensation plans had an
exercise price equal to the fair market value of the stock at
the date of grant. Accordingly, no compensation expense, other
than for restricted stock, was recognized for our stock-based
compensation associated with stock options.
50
The following table illustrates the effect on net income and net
income per share had we applied the fair value recognition
provision of SFAS 123 to the stock option awards.
Disclosures for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
are not presented because the amounts are recognized in the
Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except
|
|
|
|
per share data)
|
|
|
Net income (as reported):
|
|
$
|
22,272
|
|
Add:
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock-based employee compensation included in the
determination of net income as reported, net of tax effect of
$133
|
|
|
207
|
|
Deduct:
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock-based employee compensation determined under fair
value based method for all awards, net of tax effect of $2,259
|
|
|
(4,588
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income:
|
|
$
|
17,891
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
Basic:
|
|
|
|
|
As reported:
|
|
$
|
0.86
|
|
Pro forma:
|
|
$
|
0.69
|
|
Diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
As reported:
|
|
$
|
0.86
|
|
Pro forma:
|
|
$
|
0.69
|
|
Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123R we presented all tax
benefits resulting from the exercise of stock options as
operating cash inflows in the consolidated statements of cash
flows, in accordance with the provisions of the Emerging Issues
Task Force (EITF) Issue
No. 00-15,
Classification in the Statement of Cash Flows of the Income
Tax Benefit Received by a Company upon Exercise of a
Nonqualified Employee Stock Option. SFAS 123R requires
the benefits of tax deductions in excess of the compensation
cost recognized for those options to be classified as financing
cash inflows when they are realized rather than operating cash
inflows, on a prospective basis. Excess tax benefits generated
during the year ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, were
approximately $3.8 million and $1.0 million,
respectively.
Income taxes: Deferred income taxes are
provided for the temporary differences between the financial
reporting basis and the tax basis of our assets and liabilities
and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. A valuation
allowance is established when necessary to reduce deferred tax
assets to the amount expected to be realized. Deferred tax
assets and liabilities and operating loss and tax credit
carryforwards are measured using enacted tax rates expected to
apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary
differences and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards are
expected to be recovered or settled.
Effective January 1, 2007, we adopted the provisions of
FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty
in Income Taxes (FIN 48). FIN 48 is an
interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for
Income Taxes (SFAS 109) which provides
comprehensive guidance on the recognition and measurement of tax
positions in previously filed tax returns or positions expected
to be taken in future tax returns. The tax benefit from an
uncertain tax position must meet a
more-likely-than-not recognition threshold and is
measured at the largest amount of benefit greater than 50%
determined by cumulative probability of being realized upon
ultimate settlement with the taxing authority. The
interpretation provides guidance on derecognition,
classification, interest and penalties, as well as disclosure
requirements in the financial statements of uncertain tax
positions.
As of the adoption date and as of December 31, 2007 we
identified $1.2 million of unrecognized tax benefits which
would affect our effective tax rate if recognized.
In accordance with our accounting policy, we recognize interest
and penalties associated with uncertain tax positions in income
tax expense. As of the adoption date and December 31, 2007,
it was not necessary to accrue interest and penalties associated
with the uncertain tax positions identified.
51
We are generally not subject to income tax examination in
jurisdictions within the United States for years prior to 1995.
For non United States jurisdictions, we are generally not
subject to income tax examination for years prior to 1998.
Research and development: Costs incurred for
research and development activities are expensed as incurred.
Software costs developed for internal use are accounted for
under Statement of Position (SOP)
98-1,
Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or
Obtained for Internal Use.
Recent accounting pronouncements: In September
2006, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 157, Fair Value
Measures (SFAS 157), which defines fair
value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and
enhances disclosures about fair value measures required under
other accounting pronouncements, but does not change existing
guidance as to whether or not an instrument is carried at fair
value. The effective date of SFAS 157 for nonfinancial
assets and liabilities has been delayed by one year to fiscal
years beginning after November 15, 2008. We are currently
reviewing the provisions of SFAS 157 to determine the
impact to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 159,
The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities including an amendment to FASB Statement
No. 115 (SFAS 159). Under
SFAS 159, entities may elect to measure specified financial
instruments and warranty and insurance contracts at fair value
on a
contract-by-contract
basis, with changes in fair value recognized in earnings each
reporting period. The election, called the fair value option,
will enable entities to achieve an offset accounting effect for
changes in fair value of certain related assets and liabilities
without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions.
SFAS 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2007. The adoption of the provisions of
SFAS 159 is not expected to have a material impact to our
Consolidated Financial Statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 141
(revised 2007), Business Combinations
(SFAS 141R). SFAS 141R, retains the
fundamental requirements of Statement No. 141 to account
for all business combinations using the acquisition method
(formerly the purchase method) and for an acquiring entity to be
identified in all business combinations. However, the new
standard requires the acquiring entity in a business combination
to recognize all the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in
the transaction; establishes the acquisition-date fair value as
the measurement objective for all assets acquired and
liabilities assumed; and requires the acquirer to disclose the
information they need to evaluate and understand the nature and
financial effect of the business combination. SFAS 141R is
effective for acquisition made on or after the first day of
annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2008. We
are currently reviewing the provisions of SFAS 141R to
determine the impact to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 160,
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements An Amendment of ARB No. 51
(SFAS 160). SFAS 160 establishes new
accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling
interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a
subsidiary. SFAS 160 is effective for annual periods
beginning on or after December 15, 2008. We are currently
reviewing the provisions of SFAS 160 to determine the
impact to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Reclassifications: Certain reclassifications
have been made to the prior year amounts to conform to the
current year presentation.
In connection with our acquisitions, we have allocated the
respective purchase prices plus transaction costs to the
estimated fair values of the tangible and intangible assets
acquired and liabilities assumed. These purchase price
allocation estimates were based on our estimates of fair values.
Video Vending New York, Inc. (d.b.a.
DVDXpress): In 2005, we entered into
a credit agreement, which was subsequently amended, to provide
DVDXpress with a credit facility to provide up to
$9.9 million in financing. In addition, we signed an asset
purchase option agreement in 2005 and on September 27,
2007, we provided notice of exercise of the option and acquired
substantially all of DVDXpress assets and certain
liabilities in exchange for a cash payment of $2.7 million,
their outstanding debt and accrued interest of $8.4 million
on the credit facility plus contingent consideration up to
$1.0 million based on the achievement of specific
conditions. In December 2007, the
52
specific conditions were met and the $1.0 million
contingent amount was paid to the sellers February 2008.
DVDXpress provides a network of automated DVD rental and
purchase kiosk in the United States. In addition to the purchase
price, we incurred an estimated $0.4 million in transaction
costs including amounts related to legal and accounting charges.
Prior to the acquisition, we consolidated the fair value of
DVDXpress financial results into our Consolidated
Financial Statements in accordance with FIN 46R. Subsequent
to the close date, October 30, 2007, we will continue to
consolidate the fair value of DVDXpress financial results,
however we will no longer record a minority interest. Of the
total purchase price, $5.3 million was allocated to
goodwill, which will not be amortized, and $1.5 million was
allocated to intangible assets which will be amortized over
approximately 3 years.
Coinstar Money Transfer: During the second
quarter of 2006, we acquired CMT for $27.5 million in cash.
The acquisition was effected pursuant to the Agreement for the
Sale and Purchase of the Entire Issued Share Capital of Travelex
Money Transfer Limited dated April 30, 2006, between
Travelex Limited, Travelex Group Limited, and Coinstar. CMT is
one of the leading money transfer networks in terms of agent
locations and countries in which we do business. In addition to
company-owned locations, CMT has agreements with banks, post
offices, and other retail locations to offer its service. CMT
was established in mid-2003 and uses leading edge Internet-based
technology to provide consumers with an easy-to-use, reliable
and cost-effective way to send money around the world. In
addition to the purchase price, we incurred $2.1 million in
transaction costs, including costs relating to legal, accounting
and other directly related charges. The results of operations of
CMT since May 31, 2006, are included in our Consolidated
Financial Statements. Of the total purchase price, approximately
$23.9 million was allocated to goodwill, which will not be
amortized, and $8.9 million was allocated to intangible
assets which will be amortized over various terms through 2016.
|
|
NOTE 4:
|
PROPERTY
AND EQUIPMENT
|
Property and equipment, net (including coin-counting,
entertainment,
e-payment
and DVD machines) consisted of the following as of December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Machines
|
|
$
|
364,564
|
|
|
$
|
345,938
|
|
Computers
|
|
|
15,238
|
|
|
|
10,732
|
|
Office furniture and equipment
|
|
|
10,119
|
|
|
|
6,018
|
|
Vehicles
|
|
|
24,655
|
|
|
|
18,514
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
2,548
|
|
|
|
2,353
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
417,124
|
|
|
|
383,555
|
|
Accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(271,083
|
)
|
|
|
(222,593
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
146,041
|
|
|
$
|
160,962
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In February 2008, we reached an agreement with Wal-Mart to
significantly expand our coin-counting machines and our DVD
kiosks installed at Wal-Mart locations over the next 12 to
18 months. In conjunction with the expansion, we will be
removing approximately 50% of our cranes, bulk heads and kiddie
rides from our existing Wal-Mart locations. This decision, along
with other contract terminations or decisions to scale-back the
number of entertainment machines with other retail partners as
well as macro-economic trends negatively affecting the
entertainment service industry, resulted in excess equipment and
inventory. As a result, we recorded a non-cash impairment charge
of $52.6 million or approximately 50% of the net book value
of our entertainment machines related to the impairment of these
cranes, bulk heads, and kiddie rides.
During 2006, there were no significant changes in our business
or changes in events or circumstances that would suggest the
carrying value of fixed assets were impaired.
53
|
|
NOTE 5:
|
INTANGIBLE
ASSETS
|
The gross carrying amounts and related accumulated amortization
as well as the range of estimated useful lives of identifiable
intangible assets at the reported balance sheet dates were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Range of
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Useful Lives
|
|
|
Useful Lives
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
(in years)
|
|
|
(in years)
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retailer relationships
|
|
|
3 - 10
|
|
|
|
9.07
|
|
|
$
|
44,005
|
|
|
$
|
(17,180
|
)
|
|
$
|
49,757
|
|
|
$
|
(11,517
|
)
|
Other identifiable intangible assets
|
|
|
1 - 40
|
|
|
|
9.42
|
|
|
|
10,686
|
|
|
|
(3,054
|
)
|
|
|
6,382
|
|
|
|
(1,501
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
54,691
|
|
|
$
|
(20,234
|
)
|
|
$
|
56,139
|
|
|
$
|
(13,018
|
)
|
In February 2008, we reached an agreement with Wal-Mart to
significantly expand our coin-counting machines and our DVD
kiosks installed at Wal-Mart locations over the next 12 to
18 months. In conjunction with the expansion, we will be
removing approximately 50% of our cranes, bulk heads and kiddie
rides from our existing Wal-Mart locations. This decision, along
with other contract terminations or decisions to scale-back the
number of entertainment machines with other retail partners as
well as macro-economic trends negatively affecting the
entertainment service industry, resulted in a non-cash
impairment charge of $7.9 million relating to the
impairment of certain intangible assets. The intangible assets
related to the Wal-Mart retailer relationship were not
considered impaired due to expansion of the overall Wal-Mart
business described above.
Based on identifiable intangible assets recorded as of
December 31, 2007, and assuming no subsequent impairment of
the underlying assets, the annual estimated aggregate future
amortization expenses are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
6,734
|
|
2009
|
|
|
6,432
|
|
2010
|
|
|
5,701
|
|
2011
|
|
|
4,455
|
|
2012
|
|
|
3,834
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
7,301
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
34,457
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 6:
|
ACCRUED
LIABILITIES
|
Accrued liabilities consisted of the following as of December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Payroll related expenses
|
|
$
|
12,610
|
|
|
$
|
10,961
|
|
Interest payable
|
|
|
616
|
|
|
|
3,176
|
|
Taxes payable
|
|
|
4,068
|
|
|
|
2,944
|
|
Accrued professional fees
|
|
|
1,659
|
|
|
|
4,503
|
|
Service contract providers
|
|
|
5,451
|
|
|
|
5,170
|
|
Accrued medical insurance
|
|
|
1,951
|
|
|
|
1,684
|
|
Payable related to related party for telecommunication fee refund
|
|
|
5,547
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
9,009
|
|
|
|
7,255
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
40,911
|
|
|
$
|
35,693
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54
During the fourth quarter of 2006, we recorded $1.6 million
of expense for the proposed settlement of a lawsuit alleging
wage and hour violations under the California labor code. The
lawsuit was originated primarily from the employment practices
of the acquired entertainment subsidiary prior to the
acquisition, of which we made no admission of liability.
Long-term debt consisted of the following as of December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Revolving line of credit
|
|
$
|
257,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Term loan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
186,952
|
|
Less current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,917
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
$
|
257,000
|
|
|
$
|
185,035
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving line of credit: On November 20,
2007, we entered into a senior secured revolving line of credit
facility providing advances up to $400.0 million for
i) revolving loans, ii) swingline advances subject to
a sublimit of $25.0 million, and iii) to request the
issuance of letters of credit in our behalf subject to a
sublimit of $50.0 million. We may, subject to applicable
conditions, request an increase in the revolving line of credit
facility up to an aggregate of an additional $50.0 million.
Fees for this facility of approximately $1.7 million are
being amortized over the life of the revolving line of credit
facility of 5 years. We amortize deferred finance fees on a
straight-line basis which approximates the effective interest
method. The credit facility matures on November 20, 2012,
at which time all outstanding borrowings must be repaid and all
outstanding letters of credit must have been cash
collateralized. Our obligations under the revolving line of
credit facility are secured by a first priority security
interest in substantially all of our assets and the assets of
our domestic subsidiaries, as well as a pledge of a substantial
portion of our subsidiaries capital stock.
Subject to applicable conditions, we may elect interest rates on
our revolving borrowings calculated by reference to (i) the
British Bankers Association LIBOR rate (the BBA LIBOR
Rate) fixed for given interest periods or (ii) Bank
of Americas prime rate (or, if greater, the average rate
on overnight federal funds plus one half of one percent) (the
Base Rate), plus a margin determined by our
consolidated leverage ratio. For swing line borrowings, we will
pay interest at the Base Rate, plus a margin determined by our
consolidated leverage ratio. For borrowings made with the BBA
LIBOR Rate, the margin ranges from 75 to 175 basis points,
while for borrowings made with the Base Rate, the margin ranges
from 0 to 50 basis points. As of December 31, 2007,
our weighted average interest rate on the revolving line of
credit facility was 6.3%.
The credit facility contains standard negative covenants and
restrictions on actions including, without limitation,
restrictions on indebtedness, liens, fundamental changes or
dispositions of our assets, payments of dividends or common
stock repurchases, capital expenditures, investments, and
mergers, dispositions and acquisitions, among other
restrictions. In addition, the credit agreement requires that we
meet certain financial covenants, ratios and tests, including
maintaining a maximum consolidated leverage ratio and a minimum
interest coverage ratio, as defined in the agreement. As of
December 31, 2007, we were in compliance with all covenants.
Term loan: On July 7, 2004, we entered
into a senior secured credit facility. The credit agreement
provided for advances totaling up to $310.0 million,
consisting of a $60.0 million revolving credit facility and
a $250.0 million term loan facility. As of
December 31, 2006, no amounts were outstanding under the
revolving credit facility and our original term loan balance of
$250.0 million had been reduced to $187.0 million.
Fees for this facility of approximately $5.7 million were
being amortized over the life of the revolving line of credit
and the term loan which were 5 years and 7 years,
respectively. On November 20, 2007, the outstanding term
loan and revolving credit facility of $229.5 million was
paid in full resulting in a charge totaling $1.8 million
for the write-off of deferred financing fees. In 2006, we made a
mandatory debt paydown of $16.9 million and recorded
$0.2 million acceleration of deferred finance fees related
to this early retirement.
Interest rate hedge: On September 23,
2004, we purchased an interest rate cap and sold an interest
rate floor at zero net cost, which protected us against certain
interest rate fluctuations of the LIBOR rate, on
$125.0 million of
55
our variable rate debt under our prior term loan credit
facility. The interest rate cap and floor became effective on
October 7, 2004 and expired on October 9, 2007. The
interest rate cap and floor consisted of a LIBOR ceiling of
5.18% and a LIBOR floor that stepped up in each of the three
years beginning October 7, 2004, 2005 and 2006. The LIBOR
floor rates were 1.85%, 2.25% and 2.75% for each of the
respective one-year periods. Under this interest rate hedge, we
continued to pay interest at prevailing rates plus any spread,
as defined by our term loan credit facility, but were reimbursed
for any amounts paid on LIBOR in excess of the ceiling.
Conversely, we were required to pay the financial institution
that originated the instrument if LIBOR is less than the
respective floor rates.
We recognized the fair value of the interest rate cap and floor
as an asset of $164,000 at December 31, 2006. Any change in
the fair value of the interest rate cap and floor was reported
in accumulated other comprehensive income. Because the critical
terms of the interest rate cap and floor and the underlying
obligation were the same, there was no ineffectiveness recorded
in the consolidated statements. In conjunction with the
repayment of the term loan, we no longer hold the interest rate
cap and floor as of December 31, 2007.
Lease commitments: Our corporate
administrative, marketing and product development facility is
located in a 46,070 square foot facility in Bellevue,
Washington, under a lease that expires December 1, 2009. In
connection with our acquisitions of Amusement Factory and ACMI,
we assumed the leases for their respective corporate
headquarters as further discussed Note 17.
In addition, we have entered into capital lease agreements to
finance the acquisition of certain automobiles. These capital
leases have terms of 36 to 60 months at imputed interest
rates that range from 3.0% to 16.0%. Assets under capital lease
obligations aggregated $24.5 million and
$11.6 million, net of $10.0 million and
$6.7 million of accumulated amortization, as of
December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
A summary of our minimum lease obligations as of
December 31, 2007 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
|
Leases
|
|
|
Leases *
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
7,166
|
|
|
$
|
4,959
|
|
2009
|
|
|
5,119
|
|
|
|
3,821
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2,363
|
|
|
|
1,992
|
|
2011
|
|
|
361
|
|
|
|
1,665
|
|
2012
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
1,323
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
214
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease commitments
|
|
|
15,084
|
|
|
$
|
13,974
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less amounts representing interest
|
|
|
(1,058
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present value of lease obligation
|
|
|
14,026
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less current portion
|
|
|
(6,505
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term portion
|
|
$
|
7,521
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
One of our lease agreements is a triple net operating lease.
Accordingly, we are responsible for other obligations under the
lease including, but not limited to, taxes, insurance, utilities
and maintenance as incurred. |
Rental expense on our operating leases was $10.0 million,
$9.2 million and $11.0 million for the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Purchase commitments: We have entered into
certain purchase agreements with suppliers of our machines,
which result in total purchase commitments of $11.4 million
as of December 31, 2007.
Letters of credit: As of December 31,
2007, we had six irrevocable letters of credit that totaled
$12.4 million. These standby letters of credit, which
expire at various times through December 2008, are used to
collateralize
56
certain obligations to third parties. We expect to renew these
letters of credit. As of December 31, 2007, no amounts were
outstanding under these standby letter of credit agreements.
|
|
NOTE 9:
|
STOCKHOLDERS
EQUITY
|
Treasury stock: Under the terms of our current
credit facility, we are permitted to repurchase up to
$25.0 million of our common stock plus proceeds received
after November 20, 2007, from the issuance of new shares of
capital stock under our employee equity compensation plans.
Subsequent to November 20, 2007 and as of December 31,
2007, the authorized cumulative proceeds received from option
exercises or other equity purchases under our equity
compensation plans totaled $0.3 million bringing the total
authorized for purchase under our credit facility to
$25.3 million. After taking into consideration our share
repurchases of $6.5 million subsequent to November 20,
2007, the remaining amount authorized for repurchase under our
credit facility is $18.8 million as of December 31,
2007, however we will not exceed our repurchase limit authorized
by the board of directors as outlined below.
Apart from the credit facility limitations, on October 27,
2004, our board of directors authorized repurchase of up to
$22.5 million of our common stock plus additional shares
equal to the aggregate amount of net proceeds received after
January 1, 2003, from our employee equity compensation
plans. As of December 31, 2007, this authorization
currently allows us to repurchase up to $15.0 million of
our common stock.
|
|
NOTE 10:
|
STOCK-BASED
COMPENSATION PLANS
|
Stock-based compensation: Stock-based
compensation is accounted for in accordance with the provisions
of FASB Statement No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based
Payment (SFAS 123R) since January 1,
2006. Under SFAS 123R, the fair value of stock awards is
estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes-Merton
(BSM) option valuation model. Stock-based
compensation expense is reduced for estimated forfeitures and is
amortized over the vesting period.
The following summarizes the weighted average valuation
assumptions and grant date fair value of options granted during
the periods shown below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
(Pro Forma)
|
|
|
Expected term (in years)
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
Expected stock price volatility
|
|
|
41
|
%
|
|
|
47
|
%
|
|
|
52
|
%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
4.4
|
%
|
|
|
4.6
|
%
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Estimated fair value per option granted
|
|
$
|
10.91
|
|
|
$
|
9.87
|
|
|
$
|
11.07
|
|
The expected term of the options represents the estimated period
of time from grant until exercise and is based on historical
experience of similar awards, giving consideration to the
contractual terms, vesting schedules and expectations of future
employee behavior. Expected stock price volatility is based on
historical volatility of our stock for a period at least equal
to the expected term. The risk-free interest rate is based on
the implied yield available on United States Treasury
zero-coupon issues with an equivalent remaining term. We have
not paid dividends in the past and do not plan to pay any
dividends in the foreseeable future.
The following table summarizes stock-based compensation expense
and the related deferred tax benefit for stock option expense
during the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
$
|
6,421
|
|
|
$
|
6,258
|
|
Related deferred tax benefit
|
|
|
1,700
|
|
|
|
1,590
|
|
57
Stock options: Stock options are granted to
employees under the 2000 Amended and Restated Equity Incentive
Plan (the 2000 Plan) and the 1997 Amended and
Restated Equity Incentive Plan (the 1997 Plan).
Options awarded vest annually over 4 years and expire after
5 years. Shares of common stock are issued upon exercise of
stock options. In 2005, we revised, on a prospective basis, the
contractual term of the stock option awards from ten years to
five years. We have reserved a total of 770,000 shares of
common stock for issuance under the 2000 Plan and
8,117,274 shares of common stock for issuance under the
1997 Plan. Stock options have been granted to officers and
employees to purchase common stock at prices ranging from $0.70
to $34.45 per share, which represented the fair market value at
the date of grants and our best estimate of fair market value
for grants issued prior to our initial public offering.
Under the terms of our Amended and Restated 1997 Non-Employee
Directors Stock Option Plan, the board of directors has
provided for the automatic grant of options to purchase shares
of common stock to non-employee directors. We have reserved a
total of 400,000 shares of common stock for issuance under
the Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan. Stock
options have been granted to non-employee directors to purchase
our common stock at prices of $7.38 to $31.95 per share, which
represented the fair market value at the date of grant.
The price ranges of all options exercised were $8.00 to $30.07
in 2007, $0.70 to $31.49 in 2006 and $0.70 to $23.30 in 2005. As
of December 31, 2007, there were 5,283,236 shares of
unissued common stock reserved for issuance under all the Stock
Plans of which 2,614,724 shares were available for future
grants.
The following table presents a summary of the stock option
activity for the years ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
exercise price
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
exercise price
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
exercise price
|
|
|
OUTSTANDING, Beginning of year
|
|
|
2,514,435
|
|
|
$
|
21.52
|
|
|
|
2,656,697
|
|
|
$
|
20.81
|
|
|
|
2,442,995
|
|
|
$
|
19.23
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
502,924
|
|
|
|
30.09
|
|
|
|
232,646
|
|
|
|
24.83
|
|
|
|
846,600
|
|
|
|
23.35
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(224,229
|
)
|
|
|
19.88
|
|
|
|
(310,500
|
)
|
|
|
17.78
|
|
|
|
(324,082
|
)
|
|
|
14.09
|
|
Cancelled, expired or forfeited
|
|
|
(124,618
|
)
|
|
|
26.05
|
|
|
|
(64,408
|
)
|
|
|
22.04
|
|
|
|
(308,816
|
)
|
|
|
22.36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OUTSTANDING, End of year
|
|
|
2,668,512
|
|
|
|
23.07
|
|
|
|
2,514,435
|
|
|
|
21.52
|
|
|
|
2,656,697
|
|
|
|
20.81
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXERCISABLE, End of year
|
|
|
1,825,286
|
|
|
|
21.29
|
|
|
|
1,652,468
|
|
|
|
20.87
|
|
|
|
1,437,546
|
|
|
|
19.77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2007, total unrecognized stock-based
compensation expense related to unvested stock options was
approximately $6.4 million. This expense is expected to be
recognized over a weighted average period of approximately
15 months. As of December 31, 2007, the weighted
average remaining contractual term for options outstanding and
options exercisable was 4.44 years and 4.64 years,
respectively. As of December 31, 2007, the aggregate
intrinsic value for options outstanding and options exercisable
was $13.6 million and $12.5 million, respectively.
During the year ended December 31, 2007, the total
intrinsic value of stock options exercised was approximately
$2.4 million.
58
The following table summarizes information about common stock
options outstanding as of December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding
|
|
|
Options Exercisable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
of options
|
|
|
remaining
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
of options
|
|
|
average
|
|
Exercise price
|
|
outstanding
|
|
|
contractual life
|
|
|
exercise price
|
|
|
exercisable
|
|
|
exercise price
|
|
|
$ 7.38 - $18.59
|
|
|
540,190
|
|
|
|
4.85
|
|
|
$
|
16.78
|
|
|
|
517,905
|
|
|
$
|
16.72
|
|
18.60 - 22.60
|
|
|
582,478
|
|
|
|
4.43
|
|
|
|
20.85
|
|
|
|
549,334
|
|
|
|
20.94
|
|
22.61 - 23.90
|
|
|
593,797
|
|
|
|
3.44
|
|
|
|
23.38
|
|
|
|
417,644
|
|
|
|
23.37
|
|
23.91 - 30.00
|
|
|
529,546
|
|
|
|
5.36
|
|
|
|
25.74
|
|
|
|
323,472
|
|
|
|
26.00
|
|
30.01 - 34.45
|
|
|
422,501
|
|
|
|
4.14
|
|
|
|
30.37
|
|
|
|
16,931
|
|
|
|
31.70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,668,512
|
|
|
|
4.44
|
|
|
|
23.07
|
|
|
|
1,825,286
|
|
|
|
21.29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock awards: Restricted stock
awards are granted to certain officers and non-employee
directors under the 1997 Plan, which vests annually over four
years and one year, respectively. During 2007, 2006 and 2005, we
granted 69,171, 7,500 and 85,050, respectively, restricted stock
awards with a weighted average fair value of $30.48, $22.77 and
$24.49, respectively, per share, the respective market price of
the stock at grant date. The restricted share units require no
payment from the grantee and compensation cost is recorded based
on the market price on the grant date and is recorded equally
over the vesting period. Compensation expense related to
restricted stock awards totaled approximately $1,269,000,
$587,000 and $296,000 for the years ended December 31,
2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The related deferred tax
benefit for restricted stock awards expense was approximately
$491,000, $227,000 and $117,000 for the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
As of December 31, 2007, total unrecognized stock-based
compensation expense related to unvested restricted stock awards
was approximately $1.8 million. This expense is expected to
be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately
21 months. During the year ended December 31, 2007,
the total fair value of restricted stock awards vested was
approximately $667,000.
The following table presents a summary of restricted stock award
activity for the years ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
grant date
|
|
|
|
|
|
grant date
|
|
|
|
|
|
grant date
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
fair value
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
fair value
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
fair value
|
|
|
NON-VESTED,
Beginning of year
|
|
|
69,562
|
|
|
$
|
24.30
|
|
|
|
82,750
|
|
|
$
|
24.49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
69,171
|
|
|
|
30.48
|
|
|
|
7,500
|
|
|
|
22.77
|
|
|
|
85,050
|
|
|
|
24.49
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(27,763
|
)
|
|
|
24.03
|
|
|
|
(20,688
|
)
|
|
|
24.49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(5,425
|
)
|
|
|
27.52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,300
|
)
|
|
|
24.49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NON-VESTED, End of year
|
|
|
105,545
|
|
|
|
28.25
|
|
|
|
69,562
|
|
|
|
24.30
|
|
|
|
82,750
|
|
|
|
24.49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The components of (loss) income before income taxes were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
United States operations
|
|
$
|
(17,945
|
)
|
|
$
|
36,175
|
|
|
$
|
36,903
|
|
Foreign operations
|
|
|
(10,619
|
)
|
|
|
(5,475
|
)
|
|
|
(404
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total (loss) income before taxes
|
|
$
|
(28,564
|
)
|
|
$
|
30,700
|
|
|
$
|
36,499
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59
The components of income tax (benefit) expense were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States federal
|
|
$
|
1,216
|
|
|
$
|
826
|
|
|
$
|
506
|
|
State and local
|
|
|
1,692
|
|
|
|
617
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
|
|
447
|
|
|
|
(631
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current
|
|
|
2,831
|
|
|
|
1,890
|
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States federal
|
|
$
|
(6,707
|
)
|
|
$
|
9,519
|
|
|
$
|
11,899
|
|
State and local
|
|
|
(1,461
|
)
|
|
|
2,079
|
|
|
|
2,059
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
(974
|
)
|
|
|
(1,415
|
)
|
|
|
357
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred
|
|
|
(9,142
|
)
|
|
|
10,183
|
|
|
|
14,315
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total tax (benefit) expense
|
|
$
|
(6,311
|
)
|
|
$
|
12,073
|
|
|
$
|
14,227
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The income tax (benefit) expense differs from the amount that
would result by applying the U.S. statutory rate to (loss)
income before income taxes. A reconciliation of the difference
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
U.S. federal tax expense (benefit) at the statutory rate
|
|
|
−35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
State income taxes, net of federal impact
|
|
|
−1.9
|
%
|
|
|
4.8
|
%
|
|
|
3.7
|
%
|
Incentive stock options
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Impact of meeting the indefinite reversal criteria for
unremitted foreign earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
−4.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
State net operating loss carryforward adjustment
|
|
|
2.6
|
%
|
|
|
3.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
R&D credit
|
|
|
−0.2
|
%
|
|
|
−3.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Change in valuation allowance for deferred tax asset
|
|
|
7.0
|
%
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign rate differential
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1.6
|
%
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
−22.1
|
%
|
|
|
39.3
|
%
|
|
|
39.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities reflect the net tax
effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of
assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the
carrying amounts used for income tax purposes. Future tax
benefits for net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards are
also recognized to the extent that realization of such benefits
is more likely than not.
In determining our fiscal 2007, 2006 and 2005 tax provisions
under SFAS 109, management determined the deferred tax
assets and liabilities for each separate tax entity and
considered a number of factors including the positive and
negative evidence regarding the realization of our deferred tax
assets to determine whether a valuation allowance should be
recognized with respect to our deferred tax assets. The
consolidated tax valuation allowance was $2.5 million as of
December 31, 2007. A valuation allowance has been recorded
against foreign net operating losses as the negative evidence
outweighs the positive evidence that those deferred tax assets
will more likely than not be realized. The net change in the
valuation allowance during the years ended December 31,
2007 and 2006 was $1.6 million and $0.9 million,
respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2005,
there was a zero net change in the valuation allowance. The net
change in 2007 was comprised of $2.0 million recorded for
foreign net operating losses net of a $0.4 million
reclassification required upon the adoption of FIN 48.
60
Significant components of our deferred tax assets and
liabilities as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax loss carryforwards
|
|
$
|
12,030
|
|
|
$
|
26,194
|
|
Credit carryforwards
|
|
|
4,423
|
|
|
|
4,076
|
|
Accrued liabilities and allowances
|
|
|
2,638
|
|
|
|
4,429
|
|
Stock compensation
|
|
|
2,835
|
|
|
|
1,654
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
832
|
|
|
|
645
|
|
Foreign tax credit
|
|
|
1,134
|
|
|
|
521
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
12,311
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
249
|
|
|
|
956
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross deferred tax assets
|
|
|
36,452
|
|
|
|
38,475
|
|
Less valuation allowance
|
|
|
(2,508
|
)
|
|
|
(881
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
|
|
33,944
|
|
|
|
37,594
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,212
|
)
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
(11,065
|
)
|
|
|
(14,061
|
)
|
Unremitted earnings
|
|
|
(3,027
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(14,092
|
)
|
|
|
(27,273
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax asset
|
|
$
|
19,852
|
|
|
$
|
10,321
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2007, deferred tax assets included
approximately $46.4 million of net operating losses and
United States federal tax credits of $6.0 million. The tax
credits consist of $1.1 million of foreign tax credits that
expire from the years 2015 to 2018, $1.6 million of
research and development tax credits that expire from the years
2011 to 2028 and $2.8 million of alternative minimum tax
credits which do not expire.
During 2007 adjustments were made to the carrying value of state
net operating losses carried forward and other state deferred
tax assets to give effect for certain adjustments to previously
calculated amounts as well as changing apportionment factors,
changing tax rates and changes to state income tax laws. On a
combined basis state deferred tax assets were reduced by
$1.0 million for these adjustments. Foreign tax assets were
further reduced by $0.2 million to give effect for changes
in tax rates and to
true-up net
operating losses carried forward to actual tax returns filed.
In May 2006, we acquired CMT and recorded a deferred tax
liability of $2.7 million representing acquired intangibles
that had no tax basis. This deferred tax liability is available
to realize deferred tax assets related to net operating loss
carryforwards generated by CMT and its subsidiaries, resulting
in a lower valuation allowance to offset that deferred tax asset.
In 2006, the indefinite reversal criteria of Accounting
Principle Board Opinion No. 23, Accounting for Income
Taxes Special Areas (APB 23) in
which the earnings of our foreign operations are permanently
reinvested outside of the United States was met. As such, United
States deferred taxes will not be provided on these earnings.
United States deferred taxes previously recorded on foreign
earnings were reversed, which resulted in a $1.5 million
tax benefit in 2006. It is not practible to determine the United
States deferred taxes associated with foreign earnings that are
indefinitely reinvested.
During 2006, studies were conducted of accumulated state net
operating loss carryforwards and of qualified research and
development expenditures used in computing the research and
development tax credit. As a result of
61
these studies, we adjusted the carrying amount of the related
deferred tax balances resulting in a charge of $1.1 million
and a benefit of $1.0 million, respectively.
The income tax benefit from stock option exercises in excess of
the amounts recognized in the consolidated statements of
operations as of December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 that was
credited to common stock was approximately $0.6 million,
$1.0 million and $1.0 million, respectively.
|
|
NOTE 12:
|
(LOSS)
INCOME PER SHARE
|
Basic net (loss) income per share is computed by dividing the
net (loss) income available to common stockholders for the
period by the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding during the period. Diluted net (loss) income per
share is computed by dividing the net (loss) income for the
period by the weighted average number of common and potential
common shares outstanding (if dilutive) during the period.
Potential common shares, composed of incremental common shares
issuable upon the exercise of stock options and warrants, are
included in the calculation of diluted net (loss) income per
share to the extent such shares are dilutive.
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and
diluted net (loss) income per share for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(22,253
|
)
|
|
$
|
18,627
|
|
|
$
|
22,272
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares for basic calculation
|
|
|
27,805
|
|
|
|
27,686
|
|
|
|
25,767
|
|
Incremental shares from employee stock options and awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
342
|
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares for diluted calculation
|
|
|
27,805
|
|
|
|
28,028
|
|
|
|
26,033
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005,
options and restricted stock awards totaling 779,000,
1.0 million and 1.2 million shares of common stock,
respectively, were excluded from the computation of net income
per common share because their impact would be antidilutive.
In July 1995, we adopted a tax-qualified employee savings and
retirement plan under Section 401(k) of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986 for all employees who satisfy the age and
service requirements under this plan. This plan is funded by
voluntary employee salary deferral of up to 60% of annual
compensation (subject to the Federal limitation) and a safe
harbor employer match equaling 100% of the first 3% and 50% of
the 4th and 5th percent. Additionally, all
participating employees are 100% vested for all Coinstar matched
contributions. We contributed $1,060,000, $920,000 and $841,000
to the plan for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and
2005, respectively.
We also maintain a 401(k) profit sharing plan, which covers
substantially all of the employees of our entertainment services
subsidiaries. Employees are permitted to contribute up to 15% of
their eligible compensation. We make contributions to the plan
matching 50% of the employees contribution up to 10% of
their compensation. Matching contributions were $661,000,
$685,000 and $611,000 for the years ended December 31,
2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
|
|
NOTE 14:
|
TERMINATION
OF SUPPLIER RELATIONSHIP
|
Through April 1999, Scan Coin AB of Malmo, Sweden, was our sole
source provider of our coin-counting devices. Coinstar and Scan
Coin have been in a contract dispute since September 1998, at
which time Scan Coin claimed that we had breached the contract
and made claims to certain of our intellectual property. On
May 5, 1999, Scan Coin terminated its agreement with us and
reasserted the breach of contract claim and the claim to certain
of our intellectual property. The parties have been working to
settle the dispute amicably since that time. There is no
62
assurance, however, that the disagreement will be settled
amicably, and litigation may commence. In April 2007, we
received a request for arbitration filed by ScanCoin AB
(ScanCoin) before the Arbitration Institute of the
Stockholm Chamber of Commerce regarding ownership of
intellectual property related to an agreement between Coinstar
and ScanCoin dated April 23, 1993. The parties have
selected arbitrators, and we advanced partial payment for the
arbitration. In August 2007, we received ScanCoins
statement of claim. ScanCoin seeks a declaration of ownership of
over 70 of our patents and patent applications related to our
coin-counting machines, as well as monetary damages of
approximately $8 million, plus interest. We believe that
ScanCoins claims against us are without merit and intend
to defend ourselves vigorously in this arbitration. In October
2007, we filed a claim in United States District Court for the
Northern District of Illinois against ScanCoin North America
alleging that it is infringing on a patent we own relating to
self-service coin machines.
|
|
NOTE 15:
|
BUSINESS
SEGMENT INFORMATION
|
FASB Statement No. 131, Disclosure about Segments of an
Enterprise and Related Information, requires that companies
report separately in the financial statements certain financial
and descriptive information about operating segments profit or
loss, certain specific revenue and expense items and segment
assets. The method for determining what information is reported
is based on the way that management organizes the operating
segments for making operational decisions and assessments of
financial performance. Our chief operating decision maker is
considered to be the Chief Executive Officer (CEO).
We are organized into two reportable business segments: the
North American business (which includes the United States,
Canada and Mexico), and our International business (which
primarily includes the United Kingdom as well as other European
operations of CMT). The total revenue of the North American
segment mainly relates to operations located within the United
States, and the total revenue of the International segment
mainly relates to the operations located within the United
Kingdom. Goodwill from the acquisition of CMT has been included
in the International business segment. Goodwill arising in all
other acquisitions has been allocated to our North American
business segment. The entire charge in 2007 for asset impairment
and inventory write-off has been allocated to our North American
business segment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North American business
|
|
$
|
489,462
|
|
|
$
|
500,462
|
|
|
$
|
438,482
|
|
International business
|
|
|
56,835
|
|
|
|
33,980
|
|
|
|
21,257
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
$
|
546,297
|
|
|
$
|
534,442
|
|
|
$
|
459,739
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North American business
|
|
$
|
(11,635
|
)
|
|
$
|
22,935
|
|
|
$
|
22,402
|
|
International business
|
|
|
(10,618
|
)
|
|
|
(4,308
|
)
|
|
|
(130
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net (Ioss) income
|
|
$
|
(22,253
|
)
|
|
$
|
18,627
|
|
|
$
|
22,272
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Total assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North American business
|
|
$
|
726,098
|
|
|
$
|
694,650
|
|
International business
|
|
|
129,092
|
|
|
|
86,703
|
|
Intercompany eliminations
|
|
|
(86,617
|
)
|
|
|
(63,270
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
768,573
|
|
|
$
|
718,083
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currently, management does not use product line financial
performance as a basis for business operating decisions.
However, our CEO does analyze our revenue based on revenue
generated from our coin-counting and
63
e-payment
service revenue separate from revenue generated from our
entertainment services business. Revenue for these two product
lines is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coin-counting and
e-payment
services
|
|
$
|
307,385
|
|
|
$
|
260,952
|
|
|
$
|
220,675
|
|
Entertainment services
|
|
|
238,912
|
|
|
|
273,490
|
|
|
|
239,064
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
$
|
546,297
|
|
|
$
|
534,442
|
|
|
$
|
459,739
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have coin-counting, entertainment and
e-payment
machines that are placed with retailers that accounted for the
following percentages of our consolidated revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Wal-Mart Stores Inc
|
|
|
24.9
|
%
|
|
|
27.0
|
%
|
|
|
25.3
|
%
|
The Kroger Company
|
|
|
11.6
|
%
|
|
|
11.4
|
%
|
|
|
10.5
|
%
|
|
|
NOTE 16:
|
CERTAIN
SIGNIFICANT RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES
|
Current
Vulnerability Due to Supplier Concentrations:
Substantially all of the plush toys and other products dispensed
from the entertainment services machines are produced by foreign
manufacturers. A majority of these purchases are made directly
from manufacturers in China. We purchase our other products
indirectly from vendors who obtain a significant percentage of
such products from foreign manufacturers. As a result, we are
subject to changes in governmental policies, exchange rate
fluctuations, the imposition of tariffs, import and export
controls, transportation delays and interruptions, political and
economic disruptions and labor strikes, which could disrupt the
supply of products from such manufacturers and could result in
substantially increased costs for certain products purchased by
us which could have a material adverse effect on our financial
performance.
We currently conduct limited manufacturing operations and obtain
key hardware components used in our coin-counting and
entertainment services machines from a limited number of
suppliers. Although we use a limited number of suppliers, we
believe that other suppliers could provide similar equipment,
which may require certain modifications or may have a longer
lead time from order date. Accordingly, a change in suppliers
could cause a delay in manufacturing and a possible slow-down of
growth, which could have a materially adverse affect on future
operating results.
|
|
NOTE 17:
|
RELATED
PARTY TRANSACTIONS
|
Randall J. Fagundo, former executive of our entertainment
services subsidiary, is a member of a limited liability company
which has agreed to lease to Coinstar a 31,000 square foot
building located in Louisville, Colorado. The terms of the
agreement provide for a ten year lease term, commencing
March 1, 2003, at monthly rental payments ranging from
$25,353 for the first year to $33,076 for the tenth year,
together with additional payments in respect of the
tenants proportionate share of the maintenance and
insurance costs and property tax assessments for the leased
premises. We believe that the terms of this lease are comparable
to those that would be entered into between unrelated parties on
an arms length basis.
As of December 31, 2007 and 2006, approximately $219,000
and $448,000, respectively, of our accounts receivable balance
is due from a related party of our
e-payment
subsidiary. This receivable arose in the ordinary course of
business and relates to the purchase of prepaid air time. In
addition, approximately $5.5 million of our other accrued
liabilities balance is our best estimate of the amount due to a
related party of our
e-payment
subsidiary relating to the amount that was refunded to us on
their behalf relating to a telecommunication fee refund as a
result of an Internal Revenue Service ruling that
telecommunication fees paid during the period of March 1,
2003 through July 31, 2006 were improperly collected by the
United States government. In the third quarter of 2007, we have
64
recognized $2.7 million of income from equity investments,
or 49% of the $5.5 million payable, related to our equity
interest in the third party. We received this refund in the
amount estimated in February 2008.
In the second quarter of 2007, we entered into a loan agreement
with Redbox in the amount of $10.0 million and is recorded
in Other Assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of
December 31, 2007. The principal amount is due on
May 1, 2010 at which time any accrued and unpaid interest
is due. The note accrues interest at 11% per annum. Interest
payments are first due on May 1, 2009 and then on each
three month period thereafter through May 1, 2010.
|
|
NOTE 18:
|
SUBSEQUENT
EVENTS
|
On January 1, 2008, we exercised our option to acquire a
majority ownership interest in the voting equity of Redbox under
the terms of the LLC Interest Purchase Agreement dated
November 17, 2005. In conjunction with the option exercise
and payment of $5.1 million, our ownership interest
increased from 47.3% to 51.0%. Since our original investment in
Redbox, we have been accounting for our 47.3% ownership interest
under the equity method in our Consolidated Financial
Statements. Effective with the close of this transaction,
January 18, 2008, we will consolidate Redboxs
financial results into our Consolidated Financial Statements. We
are currently in the process of completing the purchase
accounting for this acquisition.
Effective January 1, 2008, we completed the acquisition of
GroupEx Financial Corporation, JRJ Express Inc. and Kimeco, LLC
(collectively, GroupEx), for an aggregate purchase
price of up to $70.0 million. The purchase price included a
$60.0 million cash payment (subject to a customary working
capital adjustment) at closing. Of the $60.0 million paid
at closing, $6.0 million is being held in escrow as partial
security for the indemnification obligations of the sellers
under the agreement until the earlier of (1) the date
eighteen months following the closing and (2) the date
thirty days after completion in calendar year 2009 of the 2008
calendar year audit. An additional $34.0 million of the
$60.0 million paid at closing is being held in escrow as
partial security for the indemnification obligations of the
sellers under the agreement with respect to a lawsuit against
GroupEx and one of the sellers, which will be held until a final
court order or written settlement agreement resolving such
lawsuit has been obtained. In addition, there is a contingent
payment of up to $10.0 million should certain performance
conditions be met in the fifteen months following the closing.
We are currently in the process of completing the purchase
accounting for this acquisition.
65