e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008
Or
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File No. 001-34005
Lender Processing Services, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
26-1547801 |
(State or other jurisdiction
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
of incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
601 Riverside Avenue |
|
|
Jacksonville, Florida
|
|
32204 |
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(904) 854-5100
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer
o
|
|
Accelerated filer
o
|
Non-accelerated filer þ
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act)
Yes o No þ
As of October 31, 2008, 95,270,427 shares of the Registrants Common Stock were outstanding.
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT
Quarter Ended September 30, 2008
INDEX
2
Part I: FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements (Unaudited)
LENDER PROCESSING SERVICES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES AND AFFILIATES
Consolidated and Combined Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December |
|
|
|
2008 (Unaudited) |
|
|
31, 2007 (1) |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
49,417 |
|
|
$ |
39,566 |
|
Trade receivables, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $36.0
million and $20.3 million at September 30, 2008 and December 31,
2007 |
|
|
371,098 |
|
|
|
286,236 |
|
Other receivables |
|
|
15,582 |
|
|
|
7,971 |
|
Due from affiliates |
|
|
1,082 |
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
22,387 |
|
|
|
33,323 |
|
Deferred income taxes, net |
|
|
34,640 |
|
|
|
40,440 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
494,206 |
|
|
|
407,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation and
amortization of $138.0 million and $126.1 million at September 30,
2008 and December 31, 2007 |
|
|
92,473 |
|
|
|
95,620 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
1,086,606 |
|
|
|
1,078,154 |
|
Other intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $263.0
million and $239.0 million at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 |
|
|
93,481 |
|
|
|
118,129 |
|
Computer software, net of accumulated amortization of $79.9 million
and $73.9 million at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 |
|
|
150,170 |
|
|
|
150,372 |
|
Other non-current assets |
|
|
133,049 |
|
|
|
112,232 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,049,985 |
|
|
$ |
1,962,043 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts payable |
|
$ |
32,367 |
|
|
$ |
19,499 |
|
Accrued salaries and benefits |
|
|
33,629 |
|
|
|
22,908 |
|
Recording and transfer tax liabilities |
|
|
16,708 |
|
|
|
10,657 |
|
Due to affiliates |
|
|
1,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
32,311 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
70,426 |
|
|
|
57,053 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
110,105 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred revenues |
|
|
53,946 |
|
|
|
58,076 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
350,522 |
|
|
|
168,193 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred revenues |
|
|
32,866 |
|
|
|
23,146 |
|
Deferred income taxes, net |
|
|
45,249 |
|
|
|
55,196 |
|
Long-term debt, excluding current portion |
|
|
1,438,625 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
21,439 |
|
|
|
34,419 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
1,888,701 |
|
|
|
280,954 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest |
|
|
11,103 |
|
|
|
10,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock $0.0001 par value; 50 million shares authorized,
none issued at September 30, 2008 or December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock $0.0001 par value; 500 million shares authorized, 95.3
million shares issued at September 30, 2008 |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
FISs equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,671,039 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
101,640 |
|
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
48,738 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive earnings |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock $0.0001 par value; 7,000 shares at September 30, 2008 |
|
|
(241 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
150,181 |
|
|
|
1,671,039 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
2,049,985 |
|
|
$ |
1,962,043 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Derived from audited financial statements. |
See accompanying notes to consolidated and combined financial statements.
3
LENDER PROCESSING SERVICES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES AND AFFILIATES
Consolidated and Combined Statements of Earnings
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
Processing and services revenues,
including $73.0 million and $55.5
million of revenues from related parties
for the three month periods and $175.0
million and $162.5 million of revenues
from related parties for the nine month
periods ended September 30, 2008 and
2007, respectively |
|
$ |
472,678 |
|
|
$ |
425,464 |
|
|
$ |
1,385,784 |
|
|
$ |
1,251,902 |
|
Cost of revenues, including related
party expenses of $1.9 million and $1.6
million for the three month periods and
$6.6 million and $4.2 million for the
nine month periods ended September 30,
2008 and 2007, respectively |
|
|
302,081 |
|
|
|
261,655 |
|
|
|
887,218 |
|
|
|
788,478 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
170,597 |
|
|
|
163,809 |
|
|
|
498,566 |
|
|
|
463,424 |
|
Selling, general, and administrative
expenses, including related party
expenses, net of expense reimbursements,
of $2.8 million and $6.8 million for the
three month periods and $25.1 million
and $17.1 million for the nine month
periods ended September 30, 2008 and
2007, respectively |
|
|
59,746 |
|
|
|
51,528 |
|
|
|
178,745 |
|
|
|
160,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
110,851 |
|
|
|
112,281 |
|
|
|
319,821 |
|
|
|
302,824 |
|
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
476 |
|
|
|
427 |
|
|
|
1,039 |
|
|
|
1,172 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(24,565 |
) |
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
(24,623 |
) |
|
|
(111 |
) |
Other income, net |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
277 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense) |
|
|
(24,094 |
) |
|
|
393 |
|
|
|
(23,307 |
) |
|
|
1,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before income taxes,
equity in losses of
unconsolidated entity and
minority interest |
|
|
86,757 |
|
|
|
112,674 |
|
|
|
296,514 |
|
|
|
303,885 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
33,662 |
|
|
|
43,610 |
|
|
|
115,048 |
|
|
|
117,620 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before equity in losses
of unconsolidated entity and
minority interest |
|
|
53,095 |
|
|
|
69,064 |
|
|
|
181,466 |
|
|
|
186,265 |
|
Equity in losses of unconsolidated entity |
|
|
(1,484 |
) |
|
|
(794 |
) |
|
|
(3,854 |
) |
|
|
(2,514 |
) |
Minority interest |
|
|
(330 |
) |
|
|
(279 |
) |
|
|
(1,053 |
) |
|
|
(715 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
51,281 |
|
|
$ |
67,991 |
|
|
$ |
176,559 |
|
|
$ |
183,036 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share basic (1) |
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1.85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding
basic (1) |
|
|
94,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95,551 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share diluted (1) |
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1.84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding
diluted (1) |
|
|
95,223 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95,963 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Earnings per share data for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 is reflected
on a pro forma basis (Note 3). |
See accompanying notes to consolidated and combined financial statements.
4
LENDER PROCESSING SERVICES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES AND AFFILIATES
Consolidated and Combined Statements of Comprehensive Earnings
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
51,281 |
|
|
$ |
67,991 |
|
|
$ |
176,559 |
|
|
$ |
183,036 |
|
Other comprehensive earnings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized (loss) gain on
other investments, net of
tax |
|
|
(111 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized loss on
interest rate swaps, net
of tax |
|
|
(104 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(104 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive earnings |
|
|
(215 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive earnings |
|
$ |
51,066 |
|
|
$ |
67,991 |
|
|
$ |
176,594 |
|
|
$ |
183,036 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated and combined financial statements.
5
LENDER PROCESSING SERVICES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES AND AFFILIATES
Consolidated and Combined Statement of Stockholders Equity
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
Common |
|
|
Paid-In |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
FISs |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
Stockholders |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Equity |
|
Balances, December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,671,039 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,671,039 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (January 1,
2008 to June 20, 2008) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
118,295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
118,295 |
|
Net distribution to FIS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,405 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(121,677 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(110,272 |
) |
Capitalization of Lender
Processing Services, Inc. |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,667,268 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,667,657 |
) |
|
|
389 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of
note payable to FIS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,585,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,585,000 |
) |
Net earnings (June 21, 2008
to September 30, 2008) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,264 |
|
Distribution of common
stock (July 2, 2008) |
|
|
94,610 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of restricted stock |
|
|
515 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends paid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,526 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,526 |
) |
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,674 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(241 |
) |
|
|
1,433 |
|
Tax benefit associated with
exercise of stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
512 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
512 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,790 |
|
Unrealized loss on
investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(250 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(250 |
) |
Unrealized loss on interest
rate swaps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(104 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(104 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances, September 30, 2008 |
|
|
95,264 |
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
101,640 |
|
|
$ |
48,738 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
35 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
$ |
(241 |
) |
|
$ |
150,181 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated and combined financial statements.
6
LENDER PROCESSING SERVICES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES AND AFFILIATES
Consolidated and Combined Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
176,559 |
|
|
$ |
183,036 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
68,395 |
|
|
|
77,852 |
|
Amortization of debt issuance costs |
|
|
1,509 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes, net |
|
|
3,968 |
|
|
|
13,688 |
|
Stock-based compensation cost |
|
|
14,910 |
|
|
|
10,822 |
|
Income tax benefit from exercise of stock options |
|
|
(512 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Equity in losses of unconsolidated entity |
|
|
3,854 |
|
|
|
2,514 |
|
Minority interest |
|
|
1,053 |
|
|
|
715 |
|
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in trade receivables |
|
|
(84,167 |
) |
|
|
(70,052 |
) |
Net (increase) decrease in other receivables |
|
|
(7,612 |
) |
|
|
23,603 |
|
Net decrease (increase) in prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
8,631 |
|
|
|
(6,953 |
) |
Net increase in deferred contract costs |
|
|
(3,955 |
) |
|
|
(18,776 |
) |
Net decrease (increase) in deferred revenues |
|
|
5,342 |
|
|
|
(24,272 |
) |
Net increase in accounts payable, accrued liabilities and other liabilities |
|
|
59,317 |
|
|
|
2,971 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
247,292 |
|
|
|
195,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to property and equipment |
|
|
(14,657 |
) |
|
|
(5,072 |
) |
Additions to capitalized software |
|
|
(23,685 |
) |
|
|
(29,412 |
) |
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired |
|
|
(15,488 |
) |
|
|
(37,305 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(53,830 |
) |
|
|
(71,789 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings |
|
|
25,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
Debt service payments |
|
|
(61,993 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Capitalized debt issuance costs |
|
|
(24,882 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Stock options exercised |
|
|
1,433 |
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefit from exercise of stock options |
|
|
512 |
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
(9,526 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net distributions to FIS |
|
|
(114,855 |
) |
|
|
(143,843 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(183,611 |
) |
|
|
(143,843 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
9,851 |
|
|
|
(20,484 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
39,566 |
|
|
|
47,783 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
49,417 |
|
|
$ |
27,299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest |
|
$ |
15,543 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for taxes |
|
$ |
720 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash contribution of stock compensation from FIS |
|
$ |
9,120 |
|
|
$ |
10,822 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash contribution for Espiel acquisition |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash redistribution of assets to FIS |
|
$ |
(4,537 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash
exchange of FIS note |
|
$ |
(1,585,000 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated and combined financial statements.
7
LENDER PROCESSING SERVICES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES AND AFFILIATES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Except as otherwise indicated or unless the context otherwise requires, all references to
LPS, we, the Company, or the registrant are to Lender Processing Services, Inc., a Delaware
corporation that was incorporated in December 2007 as a wholly-owned subsidiary of FIS, and its
subsidiaries; all references to FIS, the former parent, or the holding company are to
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc., a Georgia corporation formerly known as Certegy Inc.,
and its subsidiaries, that owned all of LPSs shares until July 2, 2008; all references to former
FIS are to Fidelity National Information Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and its
subsidiaries, prior to the Certegy merger described below; all references to old FNF are to
Fidelity National Financial, Inc., a Delaware corporation that owned a majority of FISs shares
through November 9, 2006; and all references to FNF are to Fidelity National Financial, Inc.
(formerly known as Fidelity National Title Group, Inc.), formerly a subsidiary of old FNF but now a
stand-alone company that remains a related entity from an accounting perspective.
(1) Basis of Presentation
The unaudited financial information included in this report includes the accounts of Lender
Processing Services, Inc. and its subsidiaries and affiliates prepared in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles and the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X.
All adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. This report should
be read in conjunction with the Companys Form 10 that became effective on June 20, 2008. The
preparation of these Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements in conformity with U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent
assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated and combined financial statements and the
reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ
from those estimates.
Capitalization and Closing of Lender Processing Services, Inc. Spin-off Transaction and Issuance of
Common Stock Shares
Our former parent, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc., is a Georgia corporation
formerly known as Certegy Inc. In February 2006, Certegy Inc. merged with and into Fidelity
National Information Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation, which we refer to as former FIS.
Certegy Inc. survived the merger, which we refer to as the Certegy merger, to form our former
parent. Following the Certegy merger, Certegy Inc. was renamed Fidelity National Information
Services, Inc., which we refer to as FIS. Prior to the Certegy merger, former FIS was a
majority-owned subsidiary of Fidelity National Financial, Inc., which we refer to as old FNF. Old
FNF merged into our former parent in November 2006 as part of a reorganization, which included old
FNFs spin-off of Fidelity National Title Group, Inc. Fidelity National Title Group, Inc. was
renamed Fidelity National Financial, Inc. following this reorganization, and we refer to it as FNF.
FNF is now a stand-alone company, but remains a related entity from an accounting perspective.
In October 2007, the board of directors of FIS approved a plan of restructuring pursuant to
which FIS would spin off its lender processing services segment to its shareholders in a tax free
distribution. Pursuant to this plan of restructuring, on June 16, 2008, FIS contributed to us all
of its interest in the assets, liabilities, businesses and employees related to FISs lender
processing services operations in exchange for a certain number of shares of our common stock and
$1,585.0 million aggregate principal amount of our debt obligations, including our new senior notes
and debt obligations under our new credit facility described in Note 5. On June 20, 2008, FIS
received a private letter ruling from the Internal Revenue Service with respect to the tax-free
nature of the plan of restructuring and distribution, and the Companys registration statement on
Form 10 with respect to the distribution was declared effective by the Securities and Exchange
Commission. The spin-off was tax-free to FIS and its shareholders, and the debt-for-debt exchange
undertaken in connection with the spin-off was tax-free to FIS.
On July 2, 2008, FIS distributed to its shareholders a dividend of one-half share of our
common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, for each issued and outstanding share of FIS common
stock held on June 24, 2008, which we refer to as the spin-off. The shares of the Company
distributed to FIS shareholders on July 2, 2008 represented all of our issued and outstanding
shares. Also on July 2, 2008, FIS exchanged 100% of our debt obligations for a like amount of FISs
existing Tranche B Term Loans issued under its Credit Agreement dated as of January 18, 2007.
Following this debt-for-debt exchange, the portion of the existing Tranche B Term Loans acquired by
FIS was
8
LENDER PROCESSING SERVICES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES AND AFFILIATES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) Continued
retired. On July 3, 2008, we commenced regular way trading on the New York Stock Exchange
under the trading symbol LPS. Prior to the spin-off, we were a wholly-owned subsidiary of FIS.
Our principal executive offices are located at 601 Riverside Avenue, Jacksonville, Florida
32204 and our main telephone number is (904) 854-5100. We were incorporated in Delaware in December
2007.
Separation from FIS and Principles of Consolidation and Combination
Our historical financial statements include assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses
directly attributable to our operations. Our historical financial statements also reflect
allocations of certain corporate expenses from FIS. These expenses have been allocated to us on a
basis that management considers to reflect most fairly or reasonably the utilization of the
services provided to or the benefit obtained by our businesses. These expense allocations reflect
an allocation to us of a portion of the compensation of certain senior officers and other personnel
of FIS who are not our employees after the spin-off but who historically provided services to us.
Certain of the amounts allocated to us reflect a portion of amounts charged to FIS under agreements
entered into with FNF. Our historical financial statements also do not reflect the debt or interest
expense we might have incurred if we had been a stand-alone entity. In addition, we will incur
other expenses, not reflected in our historical financial statements, as a result of being a
separate publicly traded company. As a result, our historical financial statements do not
necessarily reflect what our financial position or results of operations would have been if we had
operated as a stand-alone public entity during the periods covered, and may not be indicative of
our future results of operations or financial position.
Prior to June 21, 2008, the historical financial statements of the Company were presented on a
combined basis. Beginning June 21, 2008, after all the assets and liabilities of the lender
processing services segment of FIS were formally contributed by FIS to LPS, the historical
financial statements of the Company have been presented on a consolidated basis for financial
reporting purposes. The accompanying Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements include those
assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses directly attributable to LPSs operations and, prior to
June 21, 2008, allocations of certain FIS corporate assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses to
LPS.
The accompanying Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements were prepared in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles and all adjustments considered necessary for a fair
presentation have been included. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been
eliminated. Our investments in less than 50% owned affiliates are accounted for using the equity
method of accounting.
Reporting Segments
We are a leading provider of integrated technology and outsourced services to the mortgage
lending industry, with market-leading positions in mortgage processing and default management
services in the U.S. We conduct our operations through two reporting segments, Technology, Data and
Analytics and Loan Transaction Services.
Our Technology, Data and Analytics segment principally includes:
|
|
|
our mortgage processing services, which we conduct using our market-leading mortgage
servicing platform and our team of experienced support personnel based primarily at our
Jacksonville, Florida data center; |
|
|
|
|
our Desktop application, a workflow system that assists our customers in managing
business processes, which today is primarily used in connection with mortgage loan default
management, but which has broader applications; |
|
|
|
|
our other software and related service offerings, including our mortgage origination
software, our real estate closing and title insurance production software and our
middleware application which provides collaborative network connectivity among mortgage
industry participants; and |
|
|
|
|
our data and analytics businesses, the most significant of which are our alternative
property valuations business, which provides a range of valuations other than traditional
appraisals, our property records business, and our advanced analytic services, which assist
our customers in their loan marketing or loss mitigation efforts. |
9
LENDER PROCESSING SERVICES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES AND AFFILIATES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) Continued
Our Loan Transaction Services segment offers a range of services used mainly in the production
of a mortgage loan, which we refer to as our loan facilitation services, and in the management of
mortgage loans that go into default, which we refer to as default management services.
Our loan facilitation services include:
|
|
|
settlement services, which consist of title agency services, in which we act as an
agent for title insurers, closing services, in which we assist in the closing of real
estate transactions, and lien recording and release services; |
|
|
|
|
appraisal services, which consist of traditional appraisal and appraisal management
services; and |
|
|
|
|
other origination services, which consist of real estate tax services, which provide
lenders with information about the tax status of a property, flood zone information, which
assists lenders in determining whether a property is in a federally designated flood zone,
and qualified exchange intermediary services for customers who seek to engage in qualified
exchanges under Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code. |
Our default management services include, among others:
|
|
|
foreclosure management services, including access to a nationwide network of
independent attorneys, document preparation and recording and other services; |
|
|
|
|
property inspection and preservation services, designed to preserve the value of
properties securing defaulted loans; and |
|
|
|
|
asset management services, providing disposition services for our customers real
estate owned properties through a network of independent real estate brokers, attorneys and
other vendors to facilitate the transaction. |
We also have a corporate segment that consists of the corporate overhead and other smaller
operations that are not included in the other segments.
(2) Related Party Transactions
We have historically conducted business with FNF. We have various agreements with FNF under
which we have provided title agency services, software development and other data services.
Additionally, we have been allocated corporate costs from FIS and will continue to receive certain
corporate services from FIS for a period of time. A summary of these agreements in effect through
September 30, 2008 is as follows:
|
|
Agreements to provide title agency services. These agreements allow us to provide services to
existing customers through loan facilitation transactions, primarily with large national
lenders. The arrangement involves providing title agency services which result in the issuance
of title policies on behalf of title insurance underwriters owned by FNF and its subsidiaries.
Subject to certain early termination provisions for cause, each of these agreements may be
terminated upon five years prior written notice, which notice may not be given until after
the fifth anniversary of the effective date of each agreement, which ranges from July 2004
through September 2006 (thus effectively resulting in a minimum ten year term and a rolling
one-year term thereafter). Under these agreements, we earn commissions which, in aggregate,
are equal to approximately 88% of the total title premium from title policies that we place
with subsidiaries of FNF. We also perform similar functions in connection with trustee sale
guarantees, a form of title insurance that subsidiaries of FNF issue as part of the
foreclosure process on a defaulted loan. |
|
|
Agreements to provide software development and services. These agreements govern the fee
structure under which we are paid for providing software development and services to FNF which
consist of developing software for use in the title operations of FNF. |
10
LENDER PROCESSING SERVICES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES AND AFFILIATES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) Continued
|
|
Arrangements to provide other data services. Under these arrangements, we are paid for
providing other data services to FNF, which consist primarily of data services required by the
title insurance operations. |
A detail of related party items included in revenues for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008 and 2007 is as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
September 30 |
|
|
September 30 |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Title agency commissions |
|
$ |
56.8 |
|
|
$ |
34.7 |
|
|
$ |
123.6 |
|
|
$ |
103.0 |
|
Software development revenue |
|
|
13.7 |
|
|
|
15.9 |
|
|
|
41.8 |
|
|
|
44.6 |
|
Other data related services |
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
|
14.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
73.0 |
|
|
$ |
55.5 |
|
|
$ |
175.0 |
|
|
$ |
162.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title plant access and title production services. Under these agreements, we obtain access to
FNFs title plants for real property located in various states, including access to their
online databases, physical access to title records, use of space, image system use, and use of
special software, as well as other title production services. For the title plant access, we
pay monthly fees (subject to certain minimum charges) based on the number of title reports or
products ordered and other services received. For the title production services, we pay for
services based on the number of properties searched, subject to certain minimum use. The title
plant access agreement has a term of 3 years beginning in November 2006 and is automatically
renewable for successive 3 year terms unless either party gives 30 days prior written notice.
The title production services agreement can be terminated by either party upon 30 days prior
written notice. |
|
|
Agreements to provide administrative corporate support services to and from FIS and from FNF.
Historically, FNF has provided to FIS certain administrative corporate support services
relating to general management, statutory accounting, claims administration, and other
administrative support services. Prior to the spin-off, as a part of FIS, we also received
these administrative corporate support services from FNF. In connection with the spin-off, we
entered into a separate agreement with FNF for the provision of certain of these
administrative corporate support services by FNF. In addition, prior to the spin-off, FIS
provided general management, accounting, treasury, payroll, human resources, internal audit,
and other corporate administrative support services to us. In connection with the spin-off,
we entered into corporate services agreements with FIS under which we receive from FIS, and we
provide to FIS, certain transitional corporate support services. The pricing for all of these
services, both from FNF and FIS, and to FIS, is on an at-cost basis. The term of the
corporate services agreements is two years, subject to early termination because the services
are no longer required by the party receiving the services or upon mutual agreement of the
parties and subject to extension in certain circumstances. Management believes the methods
used to allocate the amounts included in these financial statements for corporate services are
reasonable. |
|
|
Corporate aircraft use agreements. Historically the Company has had access to certain
corporate aircraft owned by FNF and by FIS. In connection with the spin-off, the Company was
added as a co-obligor of the aircraft lease obligations for the aircraft leased by FIS, and
pursuant to an aircraft interchange agreement, LPS was included as an additional permitted
user of corporate aircraft leased by FNF. FNF will also continue to be a permitted user of
any aircraft leased by FIS or LPS. LPS was also added as a party to the aircraft cost sharing
agreement that was previously between FNF and FIS. Under this agreement, the Company and FIS
share the costs of one of FNFs aircraft that is used by all of the entities. The cost for
use of each aircraft under the aircraft interchange agreement is calculated on the same basis
and reflects the costs attributable to the time the aircraft is in use by the user. The
aircraft interchange agreement is terminable by any party on 30 days prior notice. The costs
under the aircraft cost sharing agreement are shared equally among FNF, FIS and the Company,
and the agreement remains in effect so long as FNF has possession or use of the aircraft (or
any replacement) but may be terminated at any time with the consent of FNF, FIS and the
Company. |
|
|
Real estate management, real estate lease and equipment lease agreements. In connection with
the spin-off and the transfer of the real property located at the Companys corporate
headquarters campus from FIS to LPS, the Company entered into new leases with FNF and FIS, as
tenants, as well as a new sublease with FNF, as landlord, for office space on the Companys
headquarters corporate campus. The Company also entered into a new
|
11
LENDER PROCESSING SERVICES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES AND AFFILIATES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) Continued
|
|
property management agreement with FNF for an office building located on the corporate campus
with the Companys headquarters. Included in the Companys expenses are amounts paid to FNF for
the lease of certain equipment and the sublease of certain office space, furniture and
furnishings at the Companys headquarters location. In addition, the Companys revenues include
amounts paid by FNF and FIS for the lease of office space located at the Companys corporate
headquarters and business operations as well as revenues for property management services for
FNF for the office building located on the corporate campus with the Companys headquarters. |
|
|
|
Licensing, cost sharing, business processing and other agreements. These agreements provide
for the reimbursement of certain amounts from FNF and FIS related to various licensing and
cost sharing agreements, as well as the payment of certain amounts by the Company to FNF or
its subsidiaries in connection with our use of certain intellectual property or other assets
of or services by FNF. |
A detail of related party items included in expenses for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008 and 2007 is as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Title plant information expense |
|
$ |
1.9 |
|
|
$ |
1.6 |
|
|
$ |
6.6 |
|
|
$ |
4.2 |
|
Corporate services |
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
|
29.1 |
|
Licensing, leasing and cost sharing agreements |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
|
|
(6.0 |
) |
|
|
(12.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
$ |
4.7 |
|
|
$ |
8.4 |
|
|
$ |
31.7 |
|
|
$ |
21.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We believe the amounts earned from or charged by FNF or FIS under each of the foregoing
service arrangements are fair and reasonable. We believe that the approximately 88% aggregate
commission rate on title insurance policies is consistent with the blended rate that would be
available to a third party title agent given the amount and the geographic distribution of the
business produced and the low risk of loss profile of the business placed. The software development
services provided to FNF are priced within the range of prices we offer to third parties. These
transactions between us and FIS and FNF are subject to periodic review for performance and pricing.
Other related party transactions:
Investment by FNF in Fidelity National Real Estate Solutions, Inc.
On December 31, 2006, FNF contributed $52.5 million to Fidelity National Real Estate
Solutions, Inc. (FNRES), an FIS subsidiary, for approximately 61% of the outstanding shares of
FNRES. As a result, since December 31, 2006, FIS no longer consolidated FNRES, but recorded the
remaining 39% interest as an equity investment. On June 16, 2008, FIS contributed its equity
investment in FNRES to LPS in the spin-off (Note 1), which totaled $26.7 million and $30.5 million
as of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. LPS recorded equity losses (net of
tax) from its investment in FNRES of $1.5 million and $0.8 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and $3.9 million and $2.5 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
(3) Unaudited Pro Forma Net Earnings per Share
The basic weighted average shares and common stock equivalents are generally computed in
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 128, Earnings per Share,
using the treasury stock method. However, due to the nature and timing of the spin-off, the number
of outstanding shares issued in the capitalization of the Company were the only shares outstanding
prior to the spin-off (Note 1). As such, management believes the resulting GAAP earnings per share
basic and GAAP earnings per share diluted measures are not meaningful for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2008, and therefore, the calculation has been excluded from the
Consolidated and Combined Statements of Earnings and the Notes thereto.
Pro forma weighted average shares outstanding basic, for the three months ended September
30, 2008, is calculated using the number of shares issued by LPS on July 2, 2008, as if the shares
had been issued on July 1,
12
LENDER PROCESSING SERVICES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES AND AFFILIATES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) Continued
2008. Pro forma weighted average shares outstanding diluted, for the three months ended
September 30, 2008, is calculated using the same number of shares as the pro forma weighted average
shares outstanding basic, plus common stock equivalents from stock awards. Pro forma weighted
average shares outstanding basic, for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, is calculated
using the same number of shares as the average of the number of shares used to calculate the pro
forma weighted average shares outstanding basic for the three months ended March 31, June 30 and
September 30, 2008. Pro forma weighted average shares outstanding diluted, for the nine months
ended September 30, 2008, is calculated using the same number of shares as the average of the
number of shares used to calculate the pro forma weighted average shares outstanding diluted for
the three months ended March 31, June 30 and September 30, 2008.
The following table summarizes the pro forma earnings per share for the three and nine months
ending September 30, 2008 (in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
Pro forma weighted average shares outstanding basic |
|
|
94,667 |
|
|
|
95,551 |
|
Plus: Pro forma common stock equivalent shares |
|
|
556 |
|
|
|
412 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma weighted average shares outstanding diluted |
|
|
95,223 |
|
|
|
95,963 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma basic net earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
|
$ |
1.85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma diluted net earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
|
$ |
1.84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options to
purchase approximately 4.5 million shares of our common stock for
the three months ended September 30, 2008 were not included in
the computation of diluted earnings per share because they were
antidilutive.
(4) Acquisitions
In May 2008, we acquired McDash Analytics, LLC for $15.5 million (net of cash acquired) which
resulted in the recognition of $10.6 million of goodwill and $4.4 million of other intangible
assets and software.
In June 2007, we acquired Espiel, Inc. and Financial Systems Integrators, Inc. for $43.3
million (net of cash acquired) which resulted in the recognition of $32.4 million of goodwill and
$12.4 million of other intangible assets and software.
(5) Long-Term Debt
Long-term debt as of September 30, 2008 consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
Term A Loan, secured, interest payable at LIBOR plus 2.50%
(6.43% at September 30, 2008), quarterly principal amortization,
maturing July 2013 |
|
$ |
665,000 |
|
Term B Loan, secured, interest payable at LIBOR plus 2.50%
(6.43% at September 30, 2008), quarterly principal amortization,
maturing July 2014 |
|
|
508,725 |
|
Revolving Loan, secured, interest payable at LIBOR plus 2.50%
(Eurocurrency Borrowings), Fed-funds plus 2.50% (Swingline
Borrowings) or Prime plus 1.50% (Base Rate Borrowings) (6.43%,
4.53% or 6.50%, respectively, at September 30, 2008), maturing
July 2013. Total of $139.3 million unused (net of outstanding
letters of credit) as of September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
Senior unsecured notes, issued at par, interest payable
semiannually at 8.125%, due July 2016 |
|
|
375,000 |
|
Other promissory notes with various interest rates and maturities |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,548,730 |
|
Less current portion |
|
|
(110,105 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, excluding current portion |
|
$ |
1,438,625 |
|
|
|
|
|
13
LENDER PROCESSING SERVICES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES AND AFFILIATES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) Continued
On July 2, 2008, we entered into a Credit Agreement (the Credit Agreement) among JPMorgan
Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and Letters of Credit Issuer and
various other lenders who are parties to the Credit Agreement. The Credit Agreement consists of:
(i) a 5-year revolving credit facility in an aggregate principal amount outstanding at any time not
to exceed $140.0 million (with a $25.0 million sub-facility for Letters of Credit); (ii) a Term A
Loan in an initial aggregate principal amount of $700.0 million; and (iii) a Term B Loan in an
initial aggregate principal amount of $510.0 million. Proceeds from disbursements under the 5-year
revolving credit facility are to be used for general corporate purposes. Our debt obligations
issued to FIS as described in Note 1 consisted of the Term A Loan, the Term B Loan and the Notes
described below.
The loans under the Credit Agreement bear interest at a floating rate, which is an applicable
margin plus, at our option, either (a) the Eurodollar (LIBOR) rate or (b) the higher of (i) the
prime rate or (ii) the federal funds rate plus 0.5% (the higher of clauses (i) and (ii), the ABR
rate). The annual margin on the Term A Loan and the revolving credit facility, for the first six
months after issuance, is 2.5% in the case of LIBOR loans and 1.5% in the case of ABR rate loans,
and thereafter a percentage per annum to be determined in accordance with a leverage ratio-based
pricing grid; and on the Term B Loan is 2.5% in the case of LIBOR loans, and 1.5% in the case of
ABR rate loans.
In addition to the scheduled principal payments, the Term Loans are (with certain exceptions)
subject to mandatory prepayment upon issuances of debt, casualty and condemnation events, and sales
of assets, as well as from up to 50% of excess cash flow (as defined in the Credit Agreement) in
excess of an agreed threshold commencing with the cash flow for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Voluntary prepayments of the loans are generally permitted at any time without fee upon proper
notice and subject to a minimum dollar requirement. However, optional prepayments of the Term B
Loan in the first year after issuance made with the proceeds of certain loans having an interest
spread lower than the Term B Loan are required to be made at 101% of the principal amount repaid.
Commitment reductions of the revolving credit facility are also permitted at any time without fee
upon proper notice. The revolving credit facility has no scheduled principal payments, but it will
be due and payable in full on July 2, 2013.
The obligations under the Credit Agreement are jointly and severally, unconditionally
guaranteed by certain of our domestic subsidiaries. Additionally, the Company and such subsidiary
guarantors pledged substantially all our respective assets as collateral security for the
obligations under the Credit Agreement and our respective guarantees.
The Credit Agreement contains customary affirmative, negative and financial covenants
including, among other things, limits on the creation of liens, limits on the incurrence of
indebtedness, restrictions on investments and dispositions, limits on the payment of dividends and
other restricted payments, a minimum interest coverage ratio and a maximum leverage ratio. Upon an
event of default, the administrative agent can accelerate the maturity of the loan. Events of
default include events customary for such an agreement, including failure to pay principal and
interest in a timely manner and breach of covenants. These events of default include a
cross-default provision that permits the lenders to declare the Credit Agreement in default if (i)
we fail to make any payment after the applicable grace period under any indebtedness with a
principal amount in excess of a specified amount or (ii) we fail to perform any other term under
any such indebtedness, as a result of which the holders thereof may cause it to become due and
payable prior to its maturity.
On July 2, 2008, we issued senior notes (the Notes) in an aggregate principal amount of
$375.0 million. The Notes were issued pursuant to an Indenture dated July 2, 2008 (the Indenture)
among the Company, the guarantors party thereto and U.S. Bank Corporate Trust Services, as Trustee.
The Notes were also subject to a Registration Rights Agreement dated July 2, 2008 (the
Registration Rights Agreement) among the Company, the guarantors parties thereto, and J.P. Morgan
Securities Inc., Banc of America Securities LLC and Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC, as
representatives of the several initial purchasers. The Notes were initially unregistered under the
Securities Act of 1933, but on October 15, 2008 were exchanged for registered notes pursuant to the
Registration Statement filed on Form S-4 that became effective on September 10, 2008.
The Notes bear interest at a rate of 8.125% per annum. Interest payments are due semi-annually
each January 1 and July 1, with the first interest payment due on January 1, 2009. The maturity
date of the Notes is July 1, 2016.
14
LENDER PROCESSING SERVICES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES AND AFFILIATES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) Continued
The Notes are our general unsecured obligations. Accordingly, they rank equally in right of
payment with all of our existing and future unsecured senior debt; senior in right of payment to
all of our future subordinated debt; effectively subordinated to our existing and future secured
debt to the extent of the assets securing such debt, including all borrowings under our credit
facilities; and effectively subordinated to all of the liabilities of our non-guarantor
subsidiaries, including trade payables and preferred stock.
The Notes are guaranteed by each existing and future domestic subsidiary that is a guarantor
under our credit facilities. The guarantees are general unsecured obligations of the guarantors.
Accordingly, they rank equally in right of payment with all existing and future unsecured senior
debt of our guarantors; senior in right of payment with all existing and future subordinated debt
of such guarantors; and effectively subordinated to such guarantors existing and future secured
debt to the extent of the assets securing such debt, including the guarantees by the guarantors of
obligations under our credit facilities.
LPS has no independent assets or operations, our subsidiaries guarantees are full and
unconditional and joint and several, and our subsidiaries, other than subsidiary guarantors, are
minor. There are no significant restrictions on the ability of LPS or any of the subsidiary
guarantors to obtain funds from any of our subsidiaries by dividend or loan.
We may redeem some or all of the Notes on or after July 1, 2011, at the redemption prices
described in the Indenture, plus accrued and unpaid interest. Upon the occurrence of a change of
control, unless we have exercised our right to redeem all of the Notes as described above, each
holder may require us to repurchase such holders Notes, in whole or in part, at a purchase price
equal to 101% of the principal amount thereof plus accrued and unpaid interest to the purchase
date.
The Indenture contains customary events of default, including a cross default provision that,
with respect to any other debt of the Company or any of our restricted subsidiaries having an
outstanding principal amount equal to or more than a specified amount in the aggregate for all such
debt, occurs upon (i) an event of default that results in such debt being due and payable prior to
its scheduled maturity or (ii) failure to make a principal payment. Upon the occurrence of an event
of default (other than a bankruptcy default with respect to the Company), the trustee or holders of
at least 25% of the Notes then outstanding may accelerate the Notes by giving us appropriate
notice. If, however, a bankruptcy default occurs with respect to the Company, then the principal of
and accrued interest on the Notes then outstanding will accelerate immediately without any
declaration or other act on the part of the trustee or any holder.
Interest Rate Swaps
On July 10, 2008, the Company entered into the following 2-year amortizing interest rate swap
transaction converting a portion of our interest rate exposure on our floating rate debt from
variable to fixed:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional Amount |
|
Bank Pays |
|
LPS pays |
Amortization Period |
|
(in millions) |
|
Variable Rate of(1) |
|
Fixed Rate of(2) |
July 31, 2008 to December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
420.0 |
|
|
1 Month LIBOR |
|
|
3.275 |
% |
December 31, 2008 to March 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
400.0 |
|
|
1 Month LIBOR |
|
|
3.275 |
% |
March 31, 2009 to June 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
385.0 |
|
|
1 Month LIBOR |
|
|
3.275 |
% |
June 30, 2009 to September 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
365.0 |
|
|
1 Month LIBOR |
|
|
3.275 |
% |
September 30, 2009 to December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
345.0 |
|
|
1 Month LIBOR |
|
|
3.275 |
% |
December 31, 2009 to March 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
330.0 |
|
|
1 Month LIBOR |
|
|
3.275 |
% |
March 31, 2010 to June 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
310.0 |
|
|
1 Month LIBOR |
|
|
3.275 |
% |
June 30, 2010 to July 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
290.0 |
|
|
1 Month LIBOR |
|
|
3.275 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
3.93% as of September 30, 2008. |
|
(2) |
|
In addition to the fixed rate paid under the swaps, we pay an applicable margin to our bank
lenders on the Term A Loan, Term B Loan and Revolving Loan equal to 2.50% as of September 30,
2008. |
15
LENDER PROCESSING SERVICES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES AND AFFILIATES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) Continued
Subsequent to quarter end, on October 6, 2008, the Company entered into an additional interest
rate swap transaction converting a portion of our interest rate exposure on our floating rate debt
from variable to fixed. Under the agreement, the Company receives a one month LIBOR rate of interest in
exchange for paying a fixed rate of 2.78% until December 31, 2010 on $350 million of notional
principal amount.
We have designated these interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges in accordance with SFAS No.
133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. The estimated fair value of
these cash flow hedges results in a liability of $0.2 million as of September 30, 2008, which is
included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets in other noncurrent liabilities and as a
component of accumulated other comprehensive earnings, net of deferred taxes. A portion of the
amount included in accumulated other comprehensive earnings will be reclassified into interest
expense as a yield adjustment as interest payments are made on the Term Loans. In accordance with
the provisions of SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, the inputs used to determine the estimated
fair value of our interest rate swaps are Level 2-type measurements.
It is our policy to execute such instruments with credit-worthy banks and not to enter into
derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes.
Principal maturities at September 30, 2008 for the next five years and thereafter are as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
$ |
1,280 |
|
2009 |
|
|
145,100 |
|
2010 |
|
|
145,100 |
|
2011 |
|
|
145,100 |
|
2012 |
|
|
145,100 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
967,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,548,730 |
|
|
|
|
|
(6) Income Taxes
During 2007, we adopted the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (FIN 48). As a result of the
adoption of FIN 48, we had no change to reserves for uncertain tax positions. Interest and
penalties on accrued but unpaid taxes are classified in the consolidated and combined financial
statements as income tax expense. There were no unrecognized tax benefits for any period presented.
(7) Commitments and Contingencies
Litigation
In the ordinary course of business, we are involved in various pending and threatened
litigation matters related to our operations, some of which include claims for punitive or
exemplary damages. We believe that no actions, other than the matters listed below, depart from
customary litigation incidental to our business. As background to the disclosure below, please note
the following:
|
|
|
These matters raise difficult and complicated factual and legal issues and are subject
to many uncertainties and complexities. |
|
|
|
|
In these matters, plaintiffs seek a variety of remedies including equitable relief in
the form of injunctive and other remedies and monetary relief in the form of compensatory
damages. In some cases, the monetary damages sought include punitive or treble damages.
None of the cases described below includes a specific statement as to the dollar amount of
damages demanded. Instead, each of the cases includes a demand in an amount to be proved at
trial. |
|
|
|
|
For the reasons specified above, it is not possible to make meaningful estimates of the
amount or range of loss that could result from these matters at this time. We review these
matters on an ongoing basis and follow the provisions of SFAS No. 5, Accounting for
Contingencies, when making accrual and disclosure decisions. |
16
LENDER PROCESSING SERVICES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES AND AFFILIATES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) Continued
|
|
|
When assessing reasonably possible and probable outcomes, we base our decision on our
assessment of the ultimate outcome following all appeals. |
|
|
|
|
We intend to vigorously defend each of these matters, and we do not believe that the
ultimate disposition of these lawsuits will have a material adverse impact on our financial
position. |
National Title Insurance of New York, Inc. Litigation
One of our subsidiaries, National Title Insurance of New York, Inc., has been named in twelve
putative class action lawsuits. The complaints in these lawsuits are substantially similar and
allege that the title insurance underwriters named as defendants, including National Title
Insurance of New York, Inc., engaged in illegal price fixing as well as market allocation and
division that resulted in higher title insurance prices for consumers. The complaints seek treble
damages in an amount to be proved at trial and an injunction against the defendants from engaging
in any anti-competitive practices under the Sherman Antitrust Act and various state statutes. A
motion was filed before the Multidistrict Litigation Panel to consolidate and/or coordinate these
actions in the United States District Court in the Southern District of New York. However, that
motion was denied. The cases are generally being consolidated before one district court judge in
each state and scheduled for the filing of consolidated complaints and motion practice.
Harris, Ernest and Mattie v. FIS Foreclosure Solutions, Inc.
A putative class action was filed on January 16, 2008 as an adversary proceeding in the
Bankruptcy Court in the Southern District of Texas. The complaint alleges that LPS engaged in
unlawful attorney fee-splitting practices in its default management business. The complaint seeks
declaratory and equitable relief reversing all attorneys fees charged to debtors in bankruptcy
court and disgorging any such fees we collected. We filed a Motion to Dismiss, and the Bankruptcy
Court dismissed three of the six counts contained in the complaint. We also filed a Motion to
Withdraw the Reference and remove the case to federal district court as the appropriate forum for
the resolution of the allegations contained in the complaint. The Bankruptcy Court recommended
removal to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas, and the U.S. District Court
accepted that recommendation in April 2008.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any material off-balance sheet arrangements other than operating leases and the
escrow and Section 1031 tax deferred exchange arrangements described below.
Escrow Arrangements
In conducting our title agency, closing and section 1031 tax deferred exchange operations, we
routinely hold customers assets in escrow and investment accounts, pending completion of real
estate and exchange transactions. Certain of these amounts are maintained in segregated
accounts and have not been included in the accompanying consolidated and combined balance sheets.
As an incentive for holding deposits at certain banks, we have ongoing programs for realizing economic
benefits through favorable arrangements with these banks.
We conduct our section 1031 tax deferred exchange operations through our subsidiary Investment
Property Exchange Services, Inc. (IPEX). Pursuant to IPEXs customary contractual arrangements
with its customers, IPEX provides qualified intermediary services for 1031 tax deferred exchanges of
property on behalf of its customer, and then holds the proceeds
from the sale transaction until such time as the customer instructs IPEX to use the principal
balance from the sale transaction in connection with the acquisition of a replacement property. These
arrangements generally last for a period of six months or less. LPS guarantees the performance of
IPEXs obligations with respect to these arrangements, including IPEXs proper application of a
customers principal balance in the acquisition of a replacement property. As of September 30, 2008,
IPEXs customers balances were held in investment accounts that were largely invested in
short-term, high grade investments that minimize the risk to its customers principal balances.
None of the investments in the portfolio included auction rate securities or equities. However, as a result of recent illiquidity in the securities marketplace, certain investments
maintained on behalf of our customers have experienced declines in market value. As of September
30, 2008, the aggregate market value of all investments held in escrow in our title agency, closing
and IPEX operations totaled $892.7 million while our contingent liability to our customers totaled
17
LENDER PROCESSING SERVICES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES AND AFFILIATES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) Continued
$932.4 million. We believe that such declines in value are largely temporary in nature and
there will be sufficient liquidity to complete our section 1031 tax deferred exchange obligations
as they become payable. In accordance with the provisions of SFAS 157, the inputs used to determine
the estimated fair value of the investments are Level 1-type measurements.
(8) Stock Option Plans
Historically, our employees have participated in FISs, FNFs and old FNFs stock incentive plans that
provide for the granting of incentive and nonqualified stock options, restricted stock and other
stock-based incentive awards to officers and key employees. Since November 9, 2006, all options and
awards held by our employees were issuable in the common stock of FIS. Prior to November 9, 2006,
certain awards held by our employees were issuable in both old FNF and FIS common stock. On
November 9, 2006, as part of the closing of the merger between FIS and old FNF, FIS assumed certain
options and restricted stock grants that the Companys employees and directors held under various
old FNF stock-based compensation plans and all these awards were converted into awards issuable in
FIS common stock.
We provided for stock compensation expense of $5.8 million and $3.6 million for the three
month periods and $14.9 million and $10.8 million for the nine month periods ended September 30,
2008 and 2007, respectively, which is included in selling, general and administrative expenses in
the accompanying consolidated and combined statements of earnings.
On July 2, 2008, in connection with the spin-off, all FIS options and FIS restricted stock
awards held by our employees prior to the spin-off were converted into options and awards issuable
in our common stock, authorized by a new stock option plan. We measured the fair value of the
awards using a Black-Scholes model with appropriate assumptions both before and after the date of
the spin-off.
On August 13, 2008, we granted 351,750 shares of restricted stock with a weighted average
grant date fair value of $34.58 per share. Also, on that date, we granted options to purchase
1,682,500 shares of common stock with a weighted average exercise price of $34.58 per share and a
weighted average fair value of $8.55 per share. The following assumptions were used for this stock
option grant: the risk free interest rate was 3.2%, the volatility factor for the expected market
price of the common stock was 25%, the expected dividend yield was 1.1% and weighted average
expected life was 5 years.
The exercise price and number of shares subject to each FIS option and FIS restricted stock
award were adjusted to reflect the differences in FISs and our common stock prices. As of
September 30, 2008, our employees held approximately 6.8 million outstanding LPS options, which
have an average exercise price of $31.12 per share and a weighted average remaining contractual
life of 5.9 years. Of the options, approximately 1.9 million were exercisable as of September 30,
2008 at an average exercise price of $22.67 per share with a weighted average remaining contractual
life of 5.3 years. As of September 30, 2008, our employees held approximately 0.5 million
outstanding LPS restricted stock awards.
18
LENDER PROCESSING SERVICES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES AND AFFILIATES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) Continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding |
|
Options Exercisable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
Weighted |
|
Intrinsic Value at |
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining |
|
Average |
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining |
|
Average |
|
Intrinsic Value at |
Range of Exercise |
|
Number of |
|
Contractual |
|
Exercise |
|
2008 |
|
Number of |
|
Contractual |
|
Exercise |
|
September 30, 2008 |
Prices |
|
Options |
|
Life |
|
Price |
|
(in thousands) |
|
Options |
|
Life |
|
Price |
|
(in thousands) |
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
13.67 |
|
|
|
1,004,873 |
|
|
|
5.88 |
|
|
$ |
12.64 |
|
|
$ |
17,968 |
|
|
|
719,214 |
|
|
|
5.65 |
|
|
$ |
12.23 |
|
|
$ |
13,155 |
|
|
13.68 |
|
|
|
|
|
20.00 |
|
|
|
229,953 |
|
|
|
3.74 |
|
|
|
18.60 |
|
|
|
2,742 |
|
|
|
229,953 |
|
|
|
3.74 |
|
|
|
18.60 |
|
|
|
2,742 |
|
|
20.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
25.00 |
|
|
|
18,728 |
|
|
|
2.36 |
|
|
|
23.13 |
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
18,728 |
|
|
|
2.36 |
|
|
|
23.13 |
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
25.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
28.00 |
|
|
|
383,981 |
|
|
|
4.71 |
|
|
|
26.33 |
|
|
|
1,610 |
|
|
|
383,981 |
|
|
|
4.71 |
|
|
|
26.33 |
|
|
|
1,610 |
|
|
28.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
30.00 |
|
|
|
30,696 |
|
|
|
3.29 |
|
|
|
28.15 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
30,696 |
|
|
|
3.29 |
|
|
|
28.15 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
30.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
33.00 |
|
|
|
38,730 |
|
|
|
6.90 |
|
|
|
32.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,961 |
|
|
|
7.02 |
|
|
|
32.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
33.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
35.00 |
|
|
|
2,185,860 |
|
|
|
6.33 |
|
|
|
34.57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
228,800 |
|
|
|
6.33 |
|
|
|
34.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
35.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
36.00 |
|
|
|
543,399 |
|
|
|
6.23 |
|
|
|
35.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,150 |
|
|
|
6.23 |
|
|
|
35.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
36.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
37.00 |
|
|
|
487,726 |
|
|
|
5.18 |
|
|
|
36.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
153,043 |
|
|
|
5.18 |
|
|
|
36.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
37.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
38.00 |
|
|
|
1,857,662 |
|
|
|
6.22 |
|
|
|
37.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
38.00 |
|
|
|
6,781,608 |
|
|
|
5.94 |
|
|
$ |
31.12 |
|
|
$ |
22,531 |
|
|
|
1,937,526 |
|
|
|
5.27 |
|
|
$ |
22.67 |
|
|
$ |
17,718 |
|
At September 30, 2008, the total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested LPS
stock options and LPS restricted stock awards held by our employees was $56.1 million, which will
be recognized in pre-tax income over a weighted average period of 1.2 years.
(9) Segment Information
Summarized unaudited financial information concerning our segments is shown in the following
tables.
As of and for the three months ended September 30, 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technology, |
|
|
Loan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Data and |
|
|
Transaction |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Analytics |
|
|
Services |
|
|
and Other |
|
|
Total |
|
Processing and services revenues |
|
$ |
138,964 |
|
|
$ |
335,389 |
|
|
$ |
(1,675 |
) |
|
$ |
472,678 |
|
Cost of revenues |
|
|
73,980 |
|
|
|
229,804 |
|
|
|
(1,703 |
) |
|
|
302,081 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
64,984 |
|
|
|
105,585 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
170,597 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
15,790 |
|
|
|
28,324 |
|
|
|
15,632 |
|
|
|
59,746 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
49,194 |
|
|
$ |
77,261 |
|
|
$ |
(15,604 |
) |
|
$ |
110,851 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
15,230 |
|
|
$ |
6,669 |
|
|
$ |
1,920 |
|
|
$ |
23,819 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,061,519 |
|
|
$ |
810,559 |
|
|
$ |
177,907 |
|
|
$ |
2,049,985 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
$ |
662,172 |
|
|
$ |
424,434 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,086,606 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for the three months ended September 30, 2007 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technology, |
|
|
Loan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Data and |
|
|
Transaction |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Analytics |
|
|
Services |
|
|
and Other |
|
|
Total |
|
Processing and services revenues |
|
$ |
139,849 |
|
|
$ |
289,256 |
|
|
$ |
(3,641 |
) |
|
$ |
425,464 |
|
Cost of revenues |
|
|
78,391 |
|
|
|
184,595 |
|
|
|
(1,331 |
) |
|
|
261,655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
61,458 |
|
|
|
104,661 |
|
|
|
(2,310 |
) |
|
|
163,809 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
16,319 |
|
|
|
28,351 |
|
|
|
6,858 |
|
|
|
51,528 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
45,139 |
|
|
$ |
76,310 |
|
|
$ |
(9,168 |
) |
|
$ |
112,281 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
16,958 |
|
|
$ |
7,279 |
|
|
$ |
1,242 |
|
|
$ |
25,479 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,047,239 |
|
|
$ |
716,479 |
|
|
$ |
151,970 |
|
|
$ |
1,915,688 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
$ |
651,600 |
|
|
$ |
426,554 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,078,154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
LENDER PROCESSING SERVICES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES AND AFFILIATES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) Continued
For the nine months ended September 30, 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technology, |
|
|
Loan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Data and |
|
|
Transaction |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Analytics |
|
|
Services |
|
|
and Other |
|
|
Total |
|
Processing and services revenues |
|
$ |
416,532 |
|
|
$ |
977,966 |
|
|
$ |
(8,714 |
) |
|
$ |
1,385,784 |
|
Cost of revenues |
|
|
229,487 |
|
|
|
666,597 |
|
|
|
(8,866 |
) |
|
|
887,218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
187,045 |
|
|
|
311,369 |
|
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
498,566 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
49,519 |
|
|
|
86,153 |
|
|
|
43,073 |
|
|
|
178,745 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
137,526 |
|
|
$ |
225,216 |
|
|
$ |
(42,921 |
) |
|
$ |
319,821 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
45,216 |
|
|
$ |
18,165 |
|
|
$ |
5,014 |
|
|
$ |
68,395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the nine months ended September 30, 2007 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technology, |
|
|
Loan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Data and |
|
|
Transaction |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Analytics |
|
|
Services |
|
|
and Other |
|
|
Total |
|
Processing and services revenues |
|
$ |
424,234 |
|
|
$ |
830,185 |
|
|
$ |
(2,517 |
) |
|
$ |
1,251,902 |
|
Cost of revenues |
|
|
238,699 |
|
|
|
553,762 |
|
|
|
(3,983 |
) |
|
|
788,478 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
185,535 |
|
|
|
276,423 |
|
|
|
1,466 |
|
|
|
463,424 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
49,095 |
|
|
|
83,104 |
|
|
|
28,401 |
|
|
|
160,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
136,440 |
|
|
$ |
193,319 |
|
|
$ |
(26,935 |
) |
|
$ |
302,824 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
52,577 |
|
|
$ |
21,498 |
|
|
$ |
3,777 |
|
|
$ |
77,852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
Except as otherwise indicated or unless the context otherwise requires, all references to
LPS, we, the Company, or the registrant are to Lender Processing Services, Inc., a Delaware
corporation that was incorporated in December 2007 as a wholly-owned subsidiary of FIS, and its
subsidiaries; all references to FIS, the former parent, or the holding company are to
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc., a Georgia corporation formerly known as Certegy Inc.,
and its subsidiaries, that owned all of LPSs shares until July 2, 2008; all references to former
FIS are to Fidelity National Information Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and its
subsidiaries, prior to the Certegy merger described below; all references to old FNF are to
Fidelity National Financial, Inc., a Delaware corporation that owned a majority of FISs shares
through November 9, 2006; and all references to FNF are to Fidelity National Financial, Inc.
(formerly known as Fidelity National Title Group, Inc.), formerly a subsidiary of old FNF but now a
stand-alone company that remains a related entity from an accounting perspective.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with Item 1: Consolidated and Combined
Financial Statements (Unaudited) and the Notes thereto included elsewhere in this report. The
discussion below contains forward-looking statements that involve a number of risks and
uncertainties. Those forward-looking statements include all statements that are not historical
facts, including statements about our beliefs and expectations. Forward-looking statements are
based on managements beliefs, as well as assumptions made by and information currently available
to management. Because such statements are based on expectations as to future economic performance
and are not statements of historical fact, actual results may differ materially from those
projected. We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result
of new information, future events or otherwise. The risks and uncertainties to which
forward-looking statements are subject include, but are not limited to: changes in general
economic, business and political conditions, including changes in the financial markets; the
effects of our substantial leverage on our ability to make acquisitions and invest in our business;
the elimination of existing and potential customers as a result of failures and consolidations in
the banking and financial services industries; changes to the laws, rules and regulations that
regulate our businesses as a result of the current economic and financial environment; the impact
of adverse changes in the level of real estate activity on demand for certain of our services; our
ability to adapt our services to changes in technology or the marketplace; risks associated with
protecting information security and privacy; the impact of any potential defects, development
delays, installation difficulties or system failures on our business and reputation; risks
associated with our spin-off from FIS, including those relating to our new stand-alone public
company status and limitations on our strategic and operating flexibility as a result of the
tax-free nature of the spin-off; and other risks and uncertainties detailed in Item 1A: Risk
Factors of Part II of this report and in the Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information,
Risk Factors, and other sections of the Companys Form 10 and other filings with the Securities
and Exchange Commission.
Overview
We are a leading provider of integrated technology and outsourced services to the mortgage
lending industry, with market-leading positions in mortgage processing and default management
services in the U.S. We have two reporting segments, Technology, Data and Analytics and Loan
Transaction Services, which produced approximately 29% and 71%, respectively, of our revenues for
the three months ended September 30, 2008, and 30% and 70%, respectively, of our revenues for the
nine months ended September 30, 2008. A large number of financial institutions use our services,
including 39 of the 50 largest banks in the U.S. based on 2007 rankings. Our technology solutions
include our mortgage processing system, which processes over 50% of all U.S. residential mortgage
loans by dollar volume. Our outsourced services include our default management services, which are
used by mortgage lenders and servicers to reduce the expense of managing defaulted loans, and our
loan facilitation services, which support most aspects of the closing of mortgage loan transactions
to national lenders and loan servicers. Our integrated solutions create a strong value proposition
for our customers across the life cycle of a mortgage. We believe that we will continue to benefit
from the opportunity to cross-sell services across our broad customer base.
21
Our Technology, Data and Analytics segment principally includes:
|
|
|
our mortgage processing services, which we conduct using our market-leading mortgage
servicing platform and our team of experienced support personnel based primarily at our
Jacksonville, Florida data center; |
|
|
|
|
our Desktop application, a workflow system that assists our customers in managing
business processes, which today is primarily used in connection with mortgage loan default
management, but which has broader applications; |
|
|
|
|
our other software and related service offerings, including our mortgage origination
software, our real estate closing and title insurance production software and our
middleware application which provides collaborative network connectivity among mortgage
industry participants; and |
|
|
|
|
our data and analytics businesses, the most significant of which are our alternative
property valuations business, which provides a range of valuations other than traditional
appraisals, our property records business, and our advanced analytic services, which assist
our customers in their loan marketing or loss mitigation efforts. |
Our Loan Transaction Services segment offers a range of services used mainly in the production
of a mortgage loan, which we refer to as our loan facilitation services, and in the management of
mortgage loans that go into default, which we refer to as default management services.
Our loan facilitation services include:
|
|
|
settlement services, which consist of title agency services, in which we act as an
agent for title insurers, closing services, in which we assist in the closing of real
estate transactions, and lien recording and release services; |
|
|
|
|
appraisal services, which consist of traditional appraisal and appraisal management
services; and |
|
|
|
|
other origination services, which consist of real estate tax services, which provide
lenders with information about the tax status of a property, flood zone information, which
assists lenders in determining whether a property is in a federally designated flood zone,
and qualified exchange intermediary services for customers who seek to engage in qualified
exchanges under Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code. |
Our default management services include, among others:
|
|
|
foreclosure management services, including access to a nationwide network of
independent attorneys, document preparation and recording and other services; |
|
|
|
|
property inspection and preservation services, designed to preserve the value of
properties securing defaulted loans; and |
|
|
|
|
asset management services, providing disposition services for our customers real
estate owned properties through a network of independent real estate brokers, attorneys and
other vendors to facilitate the transaction. |
Corporate overhead costs and other operations that are not included in our operating segments
are included in Corporate and Other.
On June 20, 2008, FIS received a private letter ruling from the Internal Revenue Service with
respect to the tax-free nature of the plan of restructuring and distribution, and the Companys
registration statement on Form 10 with respect to the distribution was declared effective by the
Securities and Exchange Commission. The spin-off was tax-free to FIS and its shareholders, and the
debt-for-debt exchange undertaken in connection with the spin-off was tax-free to FIS.
22
On July 2, 2008, FIS distributed to its shareholders a dividend of one-half share of our
common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, for each issued and outstanding share of FIS common
stock held on June 24, 2008, which we refer to as the spin-off. The shares of the Company
distributed to FIS shareholders on July 2, 2008 represented all of our issued and outstanding
shares. Also on July 2, 2008, FIS exchanged 100% of our debt obligations for a like amount of FISs
existing Tranche B Term Loans issued under its Credit Agreement dated as of January 18, 2007.
Following this debt-for-debt exchange, the portion of the existing Tranche B Term Loans acquired by
FIS was retired. On July 3, 2008, we commenced regular way trading on the New York Stock Exchange
under the trading symbol LPS. Prior to the spin-off, we were a wholly-owned subsidiary of FIS.
Recent Trends and Developments
Present economic conditions, as well as changes in financial markets, have affected and may
continue to affect our results of operations. As a result of the weakening economy and,
specifically, the declining housing market, mortgage origination rates around the country have
decreased, while default rates have increased. These changes have contributed to a significant
continued growth of our default services, partially offset by a decline in our loan origination
services. Additionally, in part as a result of the rising mortgage delinquency and default rates,
many banks and financial institutions are experiencing negative operating results, which, in some
cases, has led to the failure and or consolidation of certain banks and financial institutions.
Such failures and consolidations of banks and financial institutions, as well as the effects of
legislation that has been or may be enacted in response to current conditions, may have an
additional effect on our future results of operations.
Critical Accounting Policies
There have been no significant changes to our critical accounting policies since our Form 10
became effective on June 20, 2008.
Transactions with Related Parties
We have historically conducted business with FIS and its subsidiaries, FNF and its
subsidiaries, and other related parties. See Note 2 to the Notes to Consolidated and Combined
Financial Statements for a detailed description of all related party transactions.
Factors Affecting Comparability
The Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements included in this report that present our
financial condition and operating results reflect the following significant transactions:
|
|
|
On July 2, 2008, we borrowed $1,235.7 million under bank credit facilities, including
$25.7 million on a revolving credit facility. We also issued senior notes in an aggregate
principal amount of $375.0 million. Prior to July 2, 2008 we had no debt on the balance
sheet and an insignificant amount of interest expense on the income statement. |
As a result of the above transactions, the results of operations in the periods covered by the
Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements may not be directly comparable.
23
Comparisons of three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007
Consolidated Results of Operations Unaudited
The following tables reflect certain amounts included in operating income in our consolidated
and combined statements of earnings, the relative percentage of those amounts to total revenues,
and the change in those amounts from the comparable prior year period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Revenue |
|
|
Variance |
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
(in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Processing and services revenues |
|
$ |
472.7 |
|
|
$ |
425.5 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
47.2 |
|
|
|
11.1 |
% |
Cost of revenues |
|
|
302.1 |
|
|
|
261.7 |
|
|
|
63.9 |
% |
|
|
61.5 |
% |
|
|
(40.4 |
) |
|
|
-15.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
170.6 |
|
|
|
163.8 |
|
|
|
36.1 |
% |
|
|
38.5 |
% |
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
% |
Gross margin |
|
|
36.1 |
% |
|
|
38.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses |
|
|
59.7 |
|
|
|
51.5 |
|
|
|
12.6 |
% |
|
|
12.1 |
% |
|
|
(8.2 |
) |
|
|
-15.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
110.9 |
|
|
$ |
112.3 |
|
|
|
23.5 |
% |
|
|
26.4 |
% |
|
$ |
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
-1.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating margin |
|
|
23.5 |
% |
|
|
26.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Revenue |
|
|
Variance |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
(in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Processing and services revenues |
|
$ |
1,385.8 |
|
|
$ |
1,251.9 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
133.9 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
% |
Cost of revenues |
|
|
887.3 |
|
|
|
788.5 |
|
|
|
64.0 |
% |
|
|
63.0 |
% |
|
|
(98.8 |
) |
|
|
-12.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
498.5 |
|
|
|
463.4 |
|
|
|
36.0 |
% |
|
|
37.0 |
% |
|
|
35.1 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
% |
Gross margin |
|
|
36.0 |
% |
|
|
37.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses |
|
|
178.7 |
|
|
|
160.6 |
|
|
|
12.9 |
% |
|
|
12.8 |
% |
|
|
(18.1 |
) |
|
|
-11.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
319.8 |
|
|
$ |
302.8 |
|
|
|
23.1 |
% |
|
|
24.2 |
% |
|
$ |
17.0 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating margin |
|
|
23.1 |
% |
|
|
24.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Processing and Services Revenues
Processing and services revenues increased $47.2 million, or 11.1%, during the third quarter
of 2008, and $133.9 million, or 10.7%, during the first nine months of 2008. These increases were
primarily driven by growth in Default Services as a result of continued growth in foreclosure
volumes, partially offset by a decline in Loan Facilitation Services due to ongoing weakness in the
housing market and the resulting impact on our loan origination services.
Cost of Revenues
Cost of revenues increased $40.4 million, or 15.4%, during the third quarter of 2008, and
$98.8 million, or 12.5%, during the first nine months of 2008. Cost of revenues as a percentage of
processing and services revenues increased from 61.5% during the third quarter of 2007 to 63.9% in
the same period of 2008, and from 63.0% during the first nine months of 2007 to 64.0% in the same
period of 2008. These increases are primarily due to a change in revenue mix resulting from growth
in several of our default management services businesses, which have a higher cost of revenue
associated with their operations, combined with revenue declines from our higher margin Loan
Facilitation Services, loan origination software sales, and data and analytic services.
Additionally, the third quarter of 2007 includes an adjustment to reduce incentive compensation
based on results for that period.
Gross Margin
Gross profit as a percentage of processing and services revenues (gross margin) declined
from 38.5% during the third quarter of 2007 to 36.1% in the 2008 period, and from 37.0% during the
first nine months of 2007 to 36.0% in the same period of 2008, as a result of the factors described
above.
24
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $8.2 million, or 15.9%, during the
third quarter of 2008, and $18.1 million, or 11.3%, during the first nine months of 2008. Selling,
general and administrative expenses as a percentage of processing and services revenues was
relatively consistent year over year. The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses
during the first nine months of 2008 is primarily due to restructuring and spin-off related charges
totaling $5.5 million incurred prior to the spin-off transaction, as well as incremental public
company costs and an increase in stock compensation and other incentive related costs.
Operating Income
Operating income decreased $1.4 million, or 1.2%, during the third quarter of 2008 and
increased $17.0 million, or 5.6%, during the first nine months of 2008. Operating income as a
percentage of processing and services revenues (operating margin) declined from 26.4% during the
third quarter of 2007 to 23.5% in the 2008 period, and from 24.2% during the first nine months of
2007 to 23.1% in the 2008 period, as a result of the factors described above.
Segment Results of Operations Technology, Data and Analytics Unaudited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Revenue |
|
|
Variance |
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
(in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Processing and services revenues |
|
$ |
139.0 |
|
|
$ |
139.8 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
-0.6 |
% |
Cost of revenues |
|
|
74.0 |
|
|
|
78.4 |
|
|
|
53.2 |
% |
|
|
56.1 |
% |
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
65.0 |
|
|
|
61.4 |
|
|
|
46.8 |
% |
|
|
43.9 |
% |
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
% |
Gross margin |
|
|
46.8 |
% |
|
|
43.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses |
|
|
15.8 |
|
|
|
16.3 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
% |
|
|
11.7 |
% |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
49.2 |
|
|
$ |
45.1 |
|
|
|
35.4 |
% |
|
|
32.3 |
% |
|
$ |
4.1 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating margin |
|
|
35.4 |
% |
|
|
32.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Revenue |
|
|
Variance |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
(in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Processing and services revenues |
|
$ |
416.5 |
|
|
$ |
424.2 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
(7.7 |
) |
|
|
-1.8 |
% |
Cost of revenues |
|
|
229.5 |
|
|
|
238.7 |
|
|
|
55.1 |
% |
|
|
56.3 |
% |
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
187.0 |
|
|
|
185.5 |
|
|
|
44.9 |
% |
|
|
43.7 |
% |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
% |
Gross margin |
|
|
44.9 |
% |
|
|
43.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses |
|
|
49.5 |
|
|
|
49.1 |
|
|
|
11.9 |
% |
|
|
11.6 |
% |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
-0.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
137.5 |
|
|
$ |
136.4 |
|
|
|
33.0 |
% |
|
|
32.2 |
% |
|
$ |
1.1 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating margin |
|
|
33.0 |
% |
|
|
32.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Processing and Services Revenues
Processing and services revenues decreased nominally during the third quarter of 2008, and
$7.7 million, or 1.8%, during the first nine months of 2008 when compared to the prior year period.
The decrease during the first nine months of 2008 was primarily driven by decreases in revenues in
our loan origination software sales and data and analytics services, partially offset by continued
growth in our Desktop application.
25
Cost of Revenues
Cost of revenues decreased $4.4 million, or 5.6%, during the third quarter of 2008, and $9.2
million, or 3.9%, during the first nine months of 2008 when compared to the prior year period. Cost
of revenues as a percentage of processing and services revenues decreased from 56.1% during the
third quarter of 2007 to 53.2% in the third quarter of 2008 and from 56.3% during the first nine
months of 2007 to 55.1% in the 2008 period. These decreases are primarily due to a change in
revenue mix resulting from growth in data access and loan activities in our mortgage processing
operation, which carry a higher marginal contribution, as well as continued growth in our Desktop
services. The impact of these changes was partially offset by revenue declines from our higher
margin loan origination software sales and data and analytic services. Additionally, the third
quarter of 2007 includes an adjustment to reduce incentive compensation based on results for that
period.
Gross Margin
Gross margin increased from 43.9% during the third quarter of 2007 to 46.8% in the third
quarter of 2008, and from 43.7% during the first nine months of 2007 to 44.9% in the same period in
2008, as a result of the factors described above.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses of $15.8 million and $49.5 million during the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively, were relatively flat to comparable
balances in the prior year periods.
Operating Income
Operating income increased $4.1 million, or 9.1%, during the third quarter of 2008, and $1.1
million, or 0.8%, during the first nine months of 2008 when compared to the prior year periods.
Operating margin increased from 32.3% during the third quarter of 2007 to 35.4% in the third
quarter of 2008, and from 32.2% during the first nine months of 2007 to 33.0% in the same period of
2008, as a result of the factors described above.
26
Segment Results of Operations Loan Transaction Services Unaudited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Revenue |
|
|
Variance |
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
(in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Processing and services revenues |
|
$ |
335.4 |
|
|
$ |
289.3 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
46.1 |
|
|
|
15.9 |
% |
Cost of revenues |
|
|
229.8 |
|
|
|
184.6 |
|
|
|
68.5 |
% |
|
|
63.8 |
% |
|
|
(45.2 |
) |
|
|
-24.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
105.6 |
|
|
|
104.7 |
|
|
|
31.5 |
% |
|
|
36.2 |
% |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
% |
Gross margin |
|
|
31.5 |
% |
|
|
36.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses |
|
|
28.3 |
|
|
|
28.4 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
% |
|
|
9.8 |
% |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
77.3 |
|
|
$ |
76.3 |
|
|
|
23.0 |
% |
|
|
26.4 |
% |
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating margin |
|
|
23.0 |
% |
|
|
26.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Revenue |
|
|
Variance |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
(in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Processing and services revenues |
|
$ |
978.0 |
|
|
$ |
830.2 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
147.8 |
|
|
|
17.8 |
% |
Cost of revenues |
|
|
666.6 |
|
|
|
553.8 |
|
|
|
68.2 |
% |
|
|
66.7 |
% |
|
|
(112.8 |
) |
|
|
-20.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
311.4 |
|
|
|
276.4 |
|
|
|
31.8 |
% |
|
|
33.3 |
% |
|
|
35.0 |
|
|
|
12.7 |
% |
Gross margin |
|
|
31.8 |
% |
|
|
33.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses |
|
|
86.2 |
|
|
|
83.1 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
% |
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
|
(3.1 |
) |
|
|
-3.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
225.2 |
|
|
$ |
193.3 |
|
|
|
23.0 |
% |
|
|
23.3 |
% |
|
$ |
31.9 |
|
|
|
16.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating margin |
|
|
23.0 |
% |
|
|
23.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Processing and Services Revenues
Processing and services revenues increased $46.1 million, or 15.9%, during the third quarter
of 2008, and $147.8 million, or 17.8%, during the first nine months of 2008 when compared to the
prior year periods. The increase during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 was
primarily driven by growth of 97.1% and 85.3%, respectively, in our default management services due
to strong market growth as well as continued market share gains. These increases were partially
offset by declines in our loan facilitation services, which includes our front-end loan origination
related services, due to ongoing weakness in the housing market. The most significant declines in
our loan facilitation services included appraisal, tax, settlement and our 1031 property exchange
services.
Cost of Revenues
Cost of revenues increased $45.2 million, or 24.5%, during the third quarter of 2008, and
$112.8 million, or 20.4%, during the first nine months of 2008 when compared to the prior year
periods. Cost of revenues as a percentage of processing and services revenues increased from 63.8%
during the third quarter of 2007 to 68.5% in the 2008 period, and from 66.7% during the first nine
months of 2007 to 68.2% in the 2008 period. The increases during 2008 are primarily due to the
growth in several of our default management services operations, including field services and asset
management solutions, which have a higher cost of revenue associated with their operations.
Gross Margin
Gross margin decreased from 36.2% during the third quarter of 2007 to 31.5% in the 2008
period, and from 33.3% during the first nine months of 2007 to 31.8% in the same period of 2008.
The decline in gross margin is mainly due to a change in revenue mix as the year-over-year declines
in origination and refinance related revenues, which traditionally carry a higher margin
contribution, were offset by significant growth in certain of our lower margin default management
services operations.
27
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $0.1 million, or 0.4%, during the third
quarter of 2008, and increased $3.1 million, or 3.7%, during the first nine months of 2008 when
compared to the prior year periods. However, selling, general and administrative expenses as a
percentage of processing and services revenues decreased from 9.8% during the third quarter of 2007
to 8.4% in the same period of 2008, and from 10.0% during the first nine months of 2007 to 8.8% in
the 2008 period. The decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of
processing and services revenues is primarily due to significant growth in our default management
services and the resulting leverage of our overhead infrastructure.
Operating Income
Operating income increased $1.0 million, or 1.3%, during the third quarter of 2008, and $31.9
million, or 16.5%, during the first nine months of 2008 when compared to the prior year periods.
Operating margin decreased from 26.4% during the third quarter of 2007 to 23.0% in the third
quarter of 2008, and from 23.3% during the first nine months of 2007 to 23.0% in the 2008 period,
due to the factors described above.
Segment Results of Operations Corporate and Other
The Corporate and Other segment consists of corporate overhead costs that are not included in
the other segments as well as certain smaller operations. Net expenses for this segment increased
from $9.2 million during the third quarter of 2007 to $15.6 million in the third quarter of 2008,
and from $26.9 million during the first nine months of 2007 to $42.9 million in the same period in
2008. The increase in net corporate expenses for both the three and nine months ended September 30,
2008 is primarily due to spin-off related costs incurred in 2008 as well as higher incentive and
stock related compensation costs. Stock related compensation costs were $5.8 million and $3.6
million for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and $14.9 million and
$10.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Requirements
Our cash requirements include cost of revenues, selling, general and administrative expenses,
income taxes, debt service payments, capital expenditures, systems development expenditures,
stockholder dividends, and business acquisitions. Our principal sources of funds are cash generated
by operations and borrowings.
At September 30, 2008, we had cash on hand of $49.4 million and debt, including current
portion, of $1,548.7 million. We expect that cash flows from operations over the next twelve months
will be sufficient to fund our operating cash requirements and pay principal and interest on our
outstanding debt absent any unusual circumstances such as acquisitions or adverse changes in the
business environment.
We intend to pay quarterly cash dividends to our stockholders of $0.10 per share, although the
payment of dividends is at the discretion of our Board and subject to any limits in our debt or
other agreements and the requirements of state and federal law.
Capital Expenditures
Our principal capital expenditures are for computer software (purchased and internally
developed) and additions to property and equipment. We spent approximately $38.3 million and $34.5
million on capital expenditures during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007,
respectively, primarily on equipment, purchased software and internally developed software.
Financing
On July 2, 2008, we entered into a Credit Agreement (the Credit Agreement) among JPMorgan
Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and Letters of Credit Issuer and
various other lenders who are parties to the Credit Agreement. The Credit Agreement consists of:
(i) a 5-year revolving credit facility in an
28
aggregate principal amount outstanding at any time not to exceed $140.0 million (with a $25.0
million sub-facility for Letters of Credit) under which no borrowings are outstanding at September
30, 2008; (ii) a Term A Loan in an initial aggregate principal amount of $700.0 million under which
$665.0 million is outstanding at September 30, 2008; and (iii) a Term B Loan in an initial
aggregate principal amount of $510.0 million under which $508.7 million is outstanding at September
30, 2008. Proceeds from disbursements under the 5-year revolving credit facility are to be used for
general corporate purposes.
The loans under the Credit Agreement bear interest at a floating rate, which is an applicable
margin plus, at our option, either (a) the Eurodollar (LIBOR) rate or (b) the higher of (i) the
prime rate or (ii) the federal funds rate plus 0.5% (the higher of clauses (i) and (ii), the ABR
rate). The annual margin on the Term A Loan and the revolving credit facility, for the first six
months after issuance, is 2.5% in the case of LIBOR loans and 1.5% in the case of ABR rate loans,
and thereafter a percentage per annum to be determined in accordance with a leverage ratio-based
pricing grid; and on the Term B Loan is 2.5% in the case of LIBOR loans, and 1.5% in the case of
ABR rate loans.
In addition to the scheduled principal payments, the Term Loans are (with certain exceptions)
subject to mandatory prepayment upon issuances of debt, casualty and condemnation events, and sales
of assets, as well as from up to 50% of excess cash flow (as defined in the Credit Agreement) in
excess of an agreed threshold commencing with the cash flow for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Voluntary prepayments of the loans are generally permitted at any time without fee upon proper
notice and subject to a minimum dollar requirement. However, optional prepayments of the Term B
Loan in the first year after issuance made with the proceeds of certain loans having an interest
spread lower than the Term B Loan are required to be made at 101% of the principal amount repaid.
Commitment reductions of the revolving credit facility are also permitted at any time without fee
upon proper notice. The revolving credit facility has no scheduled principal payments, but it will
be due and payable in full on July 2, 2013.
The obligations under the Credit Agreement are jointly and severally, unconditionally
guaranteed by certain of our domestic subsidiaries. Additionally, the Company and such subsidiary
guarantors pledged substantially all our respective assets as collateral security for the
obligations under the Credit Agreement and our respective guarantees.
The Credit Agreement contains customary affirmative, negative and financial covenants
including, among other things, limits on the creation of liens, limits on the incurrence of
indebtedness, restrictions on investments and dispositions, limits on the payment of dividends and
other restricted payments, a minimum interest coverage ratio and a maximum leverage ratio. Upon an
event of default, the administrative agent can accelerate the maturity of the loan. Events of
default include events customary for such an agreement, including failure to pay principal and
interest in a timely manner and breach of covenants. These events of default include a
cross-default provision that permits the lenders to declare the Credit Agreement in default if (i)
we fail to make any payment after the applicable grace period under any indebtedness with a
principal amount in excess of a specified amount or (ii) we fail to perform any other term under
any such indebtedness, as a result of which the holders thereof may cause it to become due and
payable prior to its maturity.
On July 2, 2008, we issued senior notes (the Notes) in an aggregate principal amount of
$375.0 million. The Notes were issued pursuant to an Indenture dated July 2, 2008 (the Indenture)
among the Company, the guarantors party thereto and U.S. Bank Corporate Trust Services, as Trustee.
The Notes bear interest at a rate of 8.125% per annum. Interest payments are due semi-annually
each January 1 and July 1, with the first interest payment due on January 1, 2009. The maturity
date of the Notes is July 1, 2016.
The Notes are our general unsecured obligations. Accordingly, they rank equally in right of
payment with all of our existing and future unsecured senior debt; senior in right of payment to
all of our future subordinated debt; effectively subordinated to our existing and future secured
debt to the extent of the assets securing such debt, including all borrowings under our credit
facilities; and effectively subordinated to all of the liabilities of our non-guarantor
subsidiaries, including trade payables and preferred stock.
The Notes are guaranteed by each existing and future domestic subsidiary that is a guarantor
under our credit facilities. The guarantees are general unsecured obligations of the guarantors.
Accordingly, they rank equally in right of payment with all existing and future unsecured senior
debt of our guarantors; senior in right of payment with
29
all existing and future subordinated debt of such guarantors; and effectively subordinated to
such guarantors existing and future secured debt to the extent of the assets securing such debt,
including the guarantees by the guarantors of obligations under our credit facilities.
LPS has no independent assets or operations, our subsidiaries guarantees are full and
unconditional and joint and several, and our subsidiaries, other than subsidiary guarantors, are
minor. There are no significant restrictions on the ability of LPS or any of the subsidiary
guarantors to obtain funds from any of our subsidiaries by dividend or loan.
We may redeem some or all of the Notes on or after July 1, 2011, at the redemption prices
described in the Indenture, plus accrued and unpaid interest. Upon the occurrence of a change of
control, unless we have exercised our right to redeem all of the Notes as described above, each
holder may require us to repurchase such holders Notes, in whole or in part, at a purchase price
equal to 101% of the principal amount thereof plus accrued and unpaid interest to the purchase
date.
The Indenture contains customary events of default, including a cross default provision that,
with respect to any other debt of the Company or any of our restricted subsidiaries having an
outstanding principal amount equal to or more than a specified amount in the aggregate for all such
debt, occurs upon (i) an event of default that results in such debt being due and payable prior to
its scheduled maturity or (ii) failure to make a principal payment. Upon the occurrence of an event
of default (other than a bankruptcy default with respect to the Company), the trustee or holders of
at least 25% of the Notes then outstanding may accelerate the Notes by giving us appropriate
notice. If, however, a bankruptcy default occurs with respect to the Company, then the principal of
and accrued interest on the Notes then outstanding will accelerate immediately without any
declaration or other act on the part of the trustee or any holder.
Interest Rate Swaps
On July 10, 2008, the Company entered into the following 2-year amortizing interest rate swap
transaction converting a portion of our interest rate exposure on our floating rate debt from
variable to fixed:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional Amount |
|
Bank Pays |
|
LPS pays |
Amortization Period |
|
(in millions) |
|
Variable Rate of(1) |
|
Fixed Rate of(2) |
July 31, 2008 to December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
420.0 |
|
|
1 Month LIBOR |
|
|
3.275 |
% |
December 31, 2008 to March 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
400.0 |
|
|
1 Month LIBOR |
|
|
3.275 |
% |
March 31, 2009 to June 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
385.0 |
|
|
1 Month LIBOR |
|
|
3.275 |
% |
June 30, 2009 to September 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
365.0 |
|
|
1 Month LIBOR |
|
|
3.275 |
% |
September 30, 2009 to December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
345.0 |
|
|
1 Month LIBOR |
|
|
3.275 |
% |
December 31, 2009 to March 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
330.0 |
|
|
1 Month LIBOR |
|
|
3.275 |
% |
March 31, 2010 to June 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
310.0 |
|
|
1 Month LIBOR |
|
|
3.275 |
% |
June 30, 2010 to July 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
290.0 |
|
|
1 Month LIBOR |
|
|
3.275 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
3.93% as of September 30, 2008. |
|
(2) |
|
In addition to the fixed rate paid under the swaps, we pay an applicable margin to our bank
lenders on the Term A Loan, Term B Loan and Revolving Loan equal to 2.50% as of September 30,
2008. |
Subsequent to quarter end, on October 6, 2008, the Company entered into an additional interest
rate swap transaction converting a portion of our interest rate exposure on our floating rate debt
from variable to fixed. Under the agreement, the Company receives a
one month LIBOR rate of interest in
exchange for paying a fixed rate of 2.78% until December 31, 2010 on $350 million of notional
principal amount.
We have designated these interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges in accordance with SFAS No.
133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. The estimated fair value of
these cash flow hedges results in a liability of $0.2 million as of September 30, 2008, which is
included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets in other noncurrent liabilities and as a
component of accumulated other comprehensive earnings, net of deferred taxes. A portion of the
amount included in accumulated other comprehensive earnings will be reclassified into interest
expense as a yield adjustment as interest payments are made on the Term Loans. In accordance with
the
30
provisions of SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157), the inputs used to determine
the estimated fair value of our interest rate swaps are Level 2-type measurements.
It is our policy to execute such instruments with credit-worthy banks and not to enter into
derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes.
Contractual Obligations
Our long-term contractual obligations generally include our operating lease payments on
certain of our property and equipment. As of September 30, 2008, our required annual payments
relating to these contractual obligations were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
Total |
|
Long-term debt |
|
$ |
1,280 |
|
|
$ |
145,100 |
|
|
$ |
145,100 |
|
|
$ |
145,100 |
|
|
$ |
145,100 |
|
|
$ |
967,050 |
|
|
$ |
1,548,730 |
|
Interest on long-term debt |
|
|
18,108 |
|
|
|
97,533 |
|
|
|
89,436 |
|
|
|
85,243 |
|
|
|
75,922 |
|
|
|
172,566 |
|
|
|
538,808 |
|
Operating lease
payments |
|
|
5,285 |
|
|
|
19,277 |
|
|
|
11,474 |
|
|
|
7,465 |
|
|
|
5,274 |
|
|
|
401 |
|
|
|
49,176 |
|
Deferred compensation (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,228 |
|
|
|
20,228 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
24,673 |
|
|
$ |
261,910 |
|
|
$ |
246,010 |
|
|
$ |
237,808 |
|
|
$ |
226,296 |
|
|
$ |
1,160,245 |
|
|
$ |
2,156,942 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Deferred compensation is presented as payable after 2012 because of the uncertain timing of
the payables. |
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any material off-balance sheet arrangements other than operating leases and the
escrow and Section 1031 tax deferred exchange arrangements described below.
Escrow Arrangements
In conducting our title agency, closing and section 1031 tax deferred exchange operations, we
routinely hold customers assets in escrow and investment accounts, pending completion of real
estate and exchange transactions. Certain of these amounts are maintained in segregated accounts and have not been included in the accompanying consolidated and combined balance sheets.
As an incentive for holding deposits at certain banks, we have ongoing programs for realizing economic
benefits through favorable arrangements with these banks.
We conduct our section 1031 tax deferred exchange operations through our subsidiary Investment
Property Exchange Services, Inc. (IPEX). Pursuant to IPEXs customary contractual arrangements
with its customers, IPEX provides qualified intermediary services for 1031 tax deferred exchanges of
property on behalf of its customer, and then holds the proceeds
from the sale transaction until such time as the customer instructs IPEX to use the principal
balance from the sale transaction in connection with the acquisition of a replacement property. These
arrangements generally last for a period of six months or less. LPS guarantees the performance of
IPEXs obligations with respect to these arrangements, including IPEXs proper application of a
customers principal balance in the acquisition of a replacement property. As of September 30, 2008,
IPEXs customers balances were held in investment accounts that were largely invested in
short-term, high grade investments that minimize the risk to its customers principal balances.
None of the investments in the portfolio included auction rate
securities or equities. However, as a result of recent illiquidity in the securities marketplace, certain investments
maintained on behalf of our customers have experienced declines in market value. As of September
30, 2008, the aggregate market value of all investments held in escrow in our title agency, closing
and IPEX operations totaled $892.7 million while our contingent liability to our customers totaled
$932.4 million. We believe that such declines in value are largely temporary in nature and there
will be sufficient liquidity to complete our section 1031 tax deferred exchange obligations as they
become payable. In accordance with the provisions of SFAS 157, the inputs used to determine the
estimated fair value of the investments are Level 1-type measurements.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Staff Position (FSP)
Emerging Issues Task Force 03-6-1, Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment
Transactions Are Participating Securities, which will become effective for periods beginning on or
after December 15, 2008, and will
31
be applied retrospectively. Under the FSP, unvested share-based payment awards that contain
non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents are participating securities and,
therefore, are included in computing earnings per share (EPS) pursuant to the two-class method. The
two-class method determines earnings per share for each class of common stock and participating
securities according to dividends or dividend equivalents and their respective participation rights
in undistributed earnings. Management has determined that the adoption of the FSP will not
materially affect the Companys statements of financial condition or operations.
In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles (SFAS 162). SFAS 162 identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework
for selecting the principles to be used in the preparation of financial statements of
nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles in the United States. SFAS 162 is effective 60 days following the Securities and
Exchange Commissions approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Boards amendments to AU
Section 411, The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles. Management has determined that the adoption of SFAS 162 will not materially affect the
Companys statements of financial condition or operations.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities-an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133. (SFAS 161). SFAS 161 expands the
current disclosure requirements of SFAS 133 such that entities must now provide enhanced
disclosures on a quarterly basis regarding how and why the entity uses derivatives; how derivatives
and related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS 133 and how derivatives and related hedged
items affect an entitys financial position, performance and cash flows. Pursuant to the transition
provisions of the statement, the Company will adopt SFAS 161 in fiscal year 2009 and will present
the required disclosures in the prescribed format on a prospective basis. This statement will not
impact the Companys financial results as it is disclosure-only in nature.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51 (SFAS 160), requiring noncontrolling interests
(sometimes called minority interests) to be presented as a component of equity on the balance
sheet. SFAS 160 also requires that the amount of net income attributable to the parent and to the
noncontrolling interests be clearly identified and presented on the face of the consolidated
statement of income. This statement eliminates the need to apply purchase accounting when a parent
company acquires a noncontrolling ownership interest in a subsidiary and requires that, upon
deconsolidation of a subsidiary, a parent company recognize a gain or loss in net income after
which any retained noncontrolling interest will be reported at fair value. SFAS 160 requires
expanded disclosures in the consolidated financial statements that identify and distinguish between
the interests of the parents owners and the interest of the noncontrolling owners of subsidiaries.
SFAS 160 is effective for periods beginning on or after December 15, 2008 and will be applied
prospectively except for the presentation and disclosure requirements, which will be applied
retrospectively for all periods presented. Management has determined that the adoption of SFAS 160
will not materially affect the Companys statements of financial condition or operations.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations (SFAS
141R), requiring an acquirer in a business combination to recognize the assets acquired, the
liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree at their fair values at the
acquisition date, with limited exceptions. The costs of the acquisition and any related
restructuring costs will be expensed separately. Assets and liabilities arising from contingencies
in a business combination are to be recognized at their fair value at the acquisition date and
adjusted prospectively as new information becomes available. When the fair value of assets acquired
exceeds the fair value of consideration transferred plus any noncontrolling interest in the
acquiree, the excess will be recognized as a gain. Under SFAS 141R, all business combinations will
be accounted for prospectively by applying the acquisition method, including combinations among
mutual entities and combinations by contract alone. SFAS 141R is effective for periods beginning on
or after December 15, 2008, and will apply to business combinations occurring after the effective
date.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 157, which defines fair value, establishes guidelines
for measuring fair value and expands disclosures regarding fair value measurements. SFAS 157 does
not require any new fair value measurements but rather eliminates inconsistencies in guidance found
in various prior accounting pronouncements and is effective for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2007. In February 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 157-2, Effective Date of FASB
Statement No. 157, which delays the effective date of SFAS 157
32
for all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those that are recognized or
disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually), until
fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years.
These nonfinancial items include assets and liabilities, such as reporting units measured at fair
value in a goodwill impairment test and nonfinancial assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a
business combination. Effective January 1, 2008, we adopted SFAS 157 for financial assets and
liabilities recognized at fair value on a recurring basis. The partial adoption of SFAS 157 for
financial assets and liabilities did not have a material impact on the Companys statements of
financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risks
In the normal course of business, we are routinely subject to a variety of risks, including
those described in Part II, Item 1A, Risk Factors, below and in the sections titled Risk Factors
and Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information in our Form 10 and our other filings with the
Securities and Exchange Commission. For example, we are exposed to the risk that decreased lending
and real estate activity, which depend in part on the level of interest rates, may reduce demand
for certain of our services and adversely affect our results of operations.
The risks related to our business also include certain market risks that may affect our debt
and other financial instruments. In particular, we face the market risks associated with interest
rate movements on our outstanding debt. We expect to regularly assess market risks and to establish
policies and business practices to protect against the adverse effects of these exposures.
We are a highly leveraged company, with approximately $1,548.7 million in long-term debt
outstanding as of September 30, 2008. The Company has entered into interest rate swap transactions
which converted a portion of the interest rate exposure on our floating rate debt from variable to
fixed. Of the remaining variable rate debt not covered by the swap arrangements, we estimate that a
one percent increase in the LIBOR rate would increase our annual interest expense by approximately
$4.4 million.
Item 4T. Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the
supervision and with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial
officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and
procedures, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act. Based on this
evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that our
disclosure controls and procedures are effective to provide reasonable assurance of timely alerts
to material information required to be included in our periodic SEC reports.
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Part II: OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
In the ordinary course of business, we are involved in various pending and threatened
litigation matters related to our operations, some of which include claims for punitive or
exemplary damages. We believe that no actions, other than the matters listed below, depart from
customary litigation incidental to our business. As background to the disclosure below, please note
the following:
|
|
|
These matters raise difficult and complicated factual and legal issues and are subject
to many uncertainties and complexities. |
|
|
|
|
In these matters, plaintiffs seek a variety of remedies including equitable relief in
the form of injunctive and other remedies and monetary relief in the form of compensatory
damages. In some cases, the monetary damages sought include punitive or treble damages.
None of the cases described below includes a specific |
33
|
|
|
statement as to the dollar amount of damages demanded. Instead, each of the cases includes a
demand in an amount to be proved at trial. |
|
|
|
|
For the reasons specified above, it is not possible to make meaningful estimates of the
amount or range of loss that could result from these matters at this time. We review these
matters on an ongoing basis and follow the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies, when making accrual and disclosure
decisions. When assessing reasonably possible and probable outcomes, we base our decision
on our assessment of the ultimate outcome following all appeals. |
|
|
|
|
We intend to vigorously defend each of these matters, and we do not believe that the
ultimate disposition of these lawsuits will have a material adverse impact on our financial
position. |
National Title Insurance of New York, Inc. Litigation
One of our subsidiaries, National Title Insurance of New York, Inc., has been named in twelve
putative class action lawsuits: Barton v. National Title Insurance of New York, Inc. et al., filed
in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on March 10, 2008; Gentilcore v.
National Title Insurance of New York, Inc. et al., filed in the U.S. District Court for the
Northern District of California on March 11, 2008; Martinez v. National Title Insurance of New
York, Inc. et al., filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California on
March 18, 2008; Swick v. National Title Insurance of New York, Inc. et al., filed in the U.S.
District Court for the District of New Jersey on March 19, 2008; Davis v. National Title Insurance
of New York, Inc. et al., filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California,
Western Division, on March 20, 2008; Pepe v. National Title Insurance of New York, Inc. et al.,
filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey on March 21, 2008; Kornbluth v.
National Title Insurance of New York, Inc. et al., filed in the U.S. District Court for the
District of New Jersey on March 24, 2008; Lamb v. National Title Insurance of New York, Inc. et
al., filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey on March 24, 2008; Blackwell
v. National Title Insurance of New York, Inc. et al., filed in the U.S. District Court for the
Northern District of California on April 11, 2008; Magana v. National Title Insurance of New York,
Inc. et al., filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California on June 4,
2008; Moynahan v. National Title Insurance of New York, Inc. et al., filed in the U.S. District
Court for the Central District of California on June 10, 2008; and Romero v. National Title
Insurance of New York, Inc. et al., filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of
California on July 14, 2008. The complaints in these lawsuits are substantially similar and allege
that the title insurance underwriters named as defendants, including National Title Insurance of
New York, Inc., engaged in illegal price fixing as well as market allocation and division that
resulted in higher title insurance prices for consumers. The complaints seek treble damages in an
amount to be proved at trial and an injunction against the defendants from engaging in any
anti-competitive practices under the Sherman Antitrust Act and various state statutes. A motion was
filed before the Multidistrict Litigation Panel to consolidate and/or coordinate these actions in
the United States District Court in the Southern District of New York. However, that motion was
denied. The cases are generally being consolidated before one district court judge in each state
and scheduled for the filing of consolidated complaints and motion practice.
Harris, Ernest and Mattie v. FIS Foreclosure Solutions, Inc.
A putative class action was filed on January 16, 2008 as an adversary proceeding in the
Bankruptcy Court in the Southern District of Texas. The complaint alleges that LPS engaged in
unlawful attorney fee-splitting practices in its default management business. The complaint seeks
declaratory and equitable relief reversing all attorneys fees charged to debtors in bankruptcy
court and disgorging any such fees we collected. We filed a Motion to Dismiss, and the Bankruptcy
Court dismissed three of the six counts contained in the complaint. We also filed a Motion to
Withdraw the Reference and remove the case to federal district court as the appropriate forum for
the resolution of the allegations contained in the complaint. The Bankruptcy Court recommended
removal to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas, and the U.S. District Court
accepted that recommendation in April 2008.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
In addition to the normal risks of business, we are subject to significant risks and
uncertainties, including those listed below and elsewhere in this report and others described in
the sections titled Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information and Risk Factors in our
Form 10 and other filings with the Securities and Exchange
34
Commission, which are incorporated herein by reference. Any of the risks described herein
could result in a significant adverse effect on our results of operation and financial condition.
Consolidations and failures in the banking and financial services industry could adversely
affect our revenues by eliminating some of our existing and potential customers and making us more
dependent on a more limited number of customers.
There has been and continues to be substantial merger, acquisition and consolidation activity
in the banking and financial services industry. As a result of the rising mortgage delinquency and
default rates, many banks and financial institutions are experiencing negative operating results,
including many of our customers. In some cases, these negative operating results have led to the
failure and/or consolidation of certain banks and financial institutions, including: the merger of
Bank of America and Countrywide Financial Corporation (Countrywide); the failure of IndyMac; the
proposed acquisition of Merrill Lynch by Bank of America; the acquisition of Washington Mutuals
assets and deposits by JPMorgan Chase; and the proposed acquisition of Wachovia by Wells Fargo.
Failures, mergers and consolidations of banks and financial institutions reduce the number of
our customers and potential customers, which could adversely affect our revenues even if these
events do not reduce the aggregate activities of the consolidated entities. Further, if our
customers fail and/or merge with or are acquired by other entities that are not our customers, or
that use fewer of our services, they may discontinue or reduce their use of our services. It is
also possible that the larger banks or financial institutions resulting from mergers or
consolidations would have greater leverage in negotiating terms with us or could decide to perform
in-house some or all of the services which we currently provide or could provide. Any of these
developments could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
The recent merger of Bank of America and Countrywide is an example of such a consolidation.
Prior to the merger, each of these two entities used some of the services we provide while
obtaining others from third parties or from internal resources. Since the closing of the merger,
Bank of America has informed us that it continues to lean toward phasing out the mortgage
processing and some of the appraisal services we provide to it and instead obtaining these services
internally. These services together generated approximately 4% of our revenues in 2007. If this
decision becomes final, we anticipate that a mortgage processing conversion would occur sometime in
2010. In the meantime, the amount of revenue that we have received from the combined company since
the merger has increased and we continue to discuss other revenue opportunities that may offset a
phase-out of the mortgage processing and appraisal services. It is also possible that Bank of
America could decide to continue to use our mortgage processing and/or appraisal services or
continue to expand its relationship with us with respect to other services we offer, although no
assurance can be given in this regard.
Washington Mutual and JPMorgan Chase also use some of the services we provide, as do Wachovia
and Wells Fargo. In addition, Merrill Lynch, which is also being acquired by Bank of America, uses
certain of our services. It is possible that, as a result of one consolidating institution
providing internally or obtaining from a different provider certain services which the other
consolidating institution obtains from us, they may discontinue using certain of our services or
may begin using some of our services they had not previously used as a result of these
transactions. However, it is too soon to predict the impact that these consolidations may have on
the types, amounts and pricing of services we will provide to these institutions in the future,
35
Efforts by the government, financial institutions and other parties to address the troubled
mortgage market and the current economic and financial environment could affect us.
Several new pieces of legislation have been recently enacted to address the struggling
mortgage market and the current economic and financial environment, including the Foreclosure
Prevention Act of 2008, a piece of wide-ranging legislation aimed at assisting the troubled housing
market, and the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, which provides broad discretion to
the Secretary of the Department of the Treasury to implement a program for the purchase of up to
$700 billion in troubled assets from banks and financial institutions (TARP). It is too early to
predict the impact that this new legislation may have on our business or results of operations.
It is possible that state and/or federal authorities may take additional action to address the
current economic situation. For example, various federal and state initiatives have been proposed
concerning foreclosure relief, although we cannot predict the final form that any such legislation
or other relief may take, when it may become effective or the impact it may have on our business.
There is also increasing pressure on lenders and loan servicers to implement loan modification
programs to help existing borrowers to avoid foreclosure. The Federal National Mortgage
Association, which we refer to as Fannie Mae, and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, which
we refer to as Freddie Mac, government-sponsored organizations that are tasked with working with
financial institutions to provide liquidity to the mortgage market, have both recently been placed
into conservatorship. Also, as a result of TARP, the federal government has taken an equity
ownership interest in a number of banks and financial institutions, and may invest in additional
institutions in the future. These situations may place additional pressure on those institutions to
adopt these loan modification programs or other policies advocated by the federal government. We
are unable to predict the extent to which banks and financial institutions may implement these
policies, the form such policies may take or the impact they may have on our business and results
of operations.
The sharp rise in home foreclosures experienced over the last couple of years has also
resulted in investigations and lawsuits against various parties commenced by various governmental
authorities and third parties. It has also resulted in governmental review of aspects of the
mortgage lending business, which may lead to greater regulation in areas such as appraisals,
default management, loan closings and regulatory reporting. Such actions and proceedings could have
adverse consequences that could affect our business.
For example, in 2007, the New York Attorney General, or NYAG, began conducting an inquiry into
various practices in the mortgage market, including a review of the possibility that conflicts of
interest have in some cases affected the accuracy of property appraisals. In March 2008, the NYAG
announced a resolution of a portion of this inquiry with respect to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac each committed to adopt a new Home Valuation Code of Conduct that
establishes requirements governing appraiser selection, compensation, conflicts of interest and
corporate independence, among other matters. Among other things, the Code of Conduct prohibits the
purchase of home mortgage loans by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac if the associated appraisal is
performed by an appraiser that is employed by the lender, a real estate settlement services
provider or a subsidiary of a real estate settlement services provider. Although we provide real
estate settlement services, we do not employ appraisers. Instead, we manage the activities of
thousands of appraisers who all work as independent contractors. However, Freddie Mac issued a
bulletin indicating that the prohibition in the Code of Conduct applies to independent contractor
appraisers as well as employees.
The NYAG, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (the
principal regulator of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac) are currently reviewing the public comments on
the Code of Conduct, and are expected to clarify their collective intent and finalize the Code of
Conduct prior to December 31, 2008, with implementation to occur in 2009. If the Code of Conduct is
ultimately revised or interpreted by the parties thereto in a manner that is adverse to our
appraisal operations, we will consider multiple options, which could include: (1) possible court
challenges to the legality of the Code of Conduct, on state or federal grounds; (2) restructuring
our appraisal operations so that we can comply with the Code, which might include some form of
joint operations with a third party; or (3) selling our appraisal business. At this time, we are
unable to predict the ultimate effect of the Code of Conduct on our business or results of
operations.
36
Low levels of lending and real estate activity reduces demand for certain of our services and
may adversely affect our results of operations.
Real estate sales are affected by a number of factors, including mortgage interest rates, the
availability of funds to finance purchases, the level of home prices and general economic
conditions. The volume of refinancing transactions in particular and mortgage originations in
general declined in 2005, 2006 and 2007 from 2004 levels, resulting in reduction of revenues in
some of our businesses. In 2008, the sharply rising mortgage delinquency and default rates has
caused negative operating results at a number of banks and financial institutions and, as a result,
has significantly reduced the level of lending activity. The current Mortgage Bankers Association
forecast is for approximately $1.9 trillion of mortgage originations in 2008 compared to $2.3
trillion in 2007. These trends appear likely to continue. Our revenues in future periods will
continue to be subject to these and other factors which are beyond our control and, as a result,
are likely to fluctuate.
Further, in the event that levels of home ownership were to decline or other factors were to
reduce the aggregate number of U.S. mortgage loans, our revenues from mortgage processing could be
adversely affected.
If we were to lose any of our largest customers, our results of operations could be
significantly affected.
A small number of customers have accounted for a significant portion of our revenues, and we
expect that a limited number of customers will continue to represent a significant portion of our
revenues for the foreseeable future. In 2007, our three largest customers accounted for
approximately 25% of our aggregate revenue and approximately 23% and 26% of the revenue of our
Technology, Data and Analytics and Loan Transaction Services segments, respectively. In addition,
our fourth largest customer in 2007, which represented 3.5% of our aggregate revenue, was
Countrywide, which recently merged with Bank of America, which is one of our three largest
customers. The assets and deposits of Washington Mutual, which was also one of our three largest
customers in 2007, were recently acquired by JPMorgan Chase, which is also a significant customer
of ours. In addition, Wachovia, which is one of our significant customers, is being acquired by
Wells Fargo, which was one of our three largest customers in 2007. Our relationships with these and
other large customers are important to our future operating results, and deterioration in any of
those relationships, as a result of changes following a merger, consolidation or otherwise, could
significantly reduce our revenues. See Managements discussion and analysis of financial condition
and results of operations Business trends and conditions.
Item 6. Exhibits
(a) Exhibits:
|
31.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
32.1 |
|
Certification by Chief Executive Officer of Periodic Financial Reports pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. |
|
|
32.2 |
|
Certification by Chief Financial Officer of Periodic Financial Reports pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. |
37
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
Date: November 14, 2008 |
Lender Processing Services, Inc.
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ FRANCIS K. CHAN
|
|
|
|
Francis K. Chan |
|
|
|
Executive Vice
President and Chief
Financial Officer |
|
38
LENDER PROCESSING SERVICES, INC.
FORM 10-Q
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
The following documents are being filed with this Report:
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
No. |
|
Description |
31.1
|
|
Certification of Jeffrey S. Carbiener, Chief Executive Officer of
Lender Processing Services, Inc., pursuant to rule 13a-14(a) or
15d-14(a) of the Exchange Act, as adopted pursuant to Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Francis K. Chan, Chief Financial Officer of
Lender Processing Services, Inc., pursuant to rule 13a-14(a) or
15d-14(a) of the Exchange Act, as adopted pursuant to Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Jeffrey S. Carbiener, Chief Executive Officer of
Lender Processing Services, Inc., pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Francis K. Chan, Chief Financial Officer of
Lender Processing Services, Inc., pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002. |
39