UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

þ		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007

OR

o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM ______ TO ______

Commission File Number: 1-14267

REPUBLIC SERVICES, INC.

DELAWARE		65-0716904
(State of Incorporation)		(IRS Employer Identification No.)
110 S.E. 6TH STREET, 28TH FLOOR
FT. LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA		33301
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code: (954) 769-2400

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check One):

Large accelerated filer þ		Accelerated filer o		Non-accelerated filer o

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ

     On April 30, 2007, the registrant had outstanding 193,569,160 shares of Common Stock, par value $.01 per share.

 

 

REPUBLIC SERVICES, INC.

INDEX

				Page
PART I.		FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1.		Financial Statements
		Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2007 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2006			3
		Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2007 and 2006			4
		Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2007			5
		Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2007 and 2006			6
		Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements			7
ITEM 2.		Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations			26
ITEM 3.		Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk			40
ITEM 4.		Controls and Procedures			40
PART II.		OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1.		Legal Proceedings			41
ITEM 1A.		Risk Factors			41
ITEM 2.		Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds			41
ITEM 6.		Exhibits			42
EX-10.1 O'Connor Employment Agreement
EX-10.2 Cordesman Employment Agreement
EX-10.3 Holmes Employment Agreement
EX-10.4 Barclay Employment Agreement
EX-31.1 Section 302 Certification of CEO
EX-31.2 Section 302 Certification of CFO
EX-32.1 Section 906 Certification of CEO
EX-32.2 Section 906 Certification of CFO

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

REPUBLIC SERVICES, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in millions, except share data)

		March 31,				December 31,
		2007				2006
		(Unaudited)
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents		$	20.3			$	29.1
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $18.2 and $18.8, respectively			297.7				293.8
Prepaid expenses and other current assets			65.1				60.5
Deferred tax assets			25.6				10.0
Total Current Assets			408.7				393.4
RESTRICTED CASH			142.0				153.3
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET			2,140.5				2,163.8
GOODWILL, NET			1,562.7				1,562.9
INTANGIBLE ASSETS, NET			29.5				31.0
OTHER ASSETS			127.2				125.0
		$	4,410.6			$	4,429.4
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Accounts payable		$	108.8			$	161.5
Accrued liabilities			145.6				188.2
Deferred revenue			110.6				107.0
Notes payable and current maturities of long-term debt			2.5				2.6
Other current liabilities			167.4				142.9
Total Current Liabilities			534.9				602.2
LONG-TERM DEBT, NET OF CURRENT MATURITIES			1,549.7				1,544.6
ACCRUED LANDFILL AND ENVIRONMENTAL COSTS			277.2				260.7
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES AND OTHER LONG-TERM TAX LIABILITIES			466.2				419.7
OTHER LIABILITIES			182.0				180.1
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY:
Preferred stock, par value $.01 per share; 50,000,000 shares authorized; none issued			—				—
Common stock, par value $.01 per share; 750,000,000 shares authorized; 194,355,614 and 193,711,579 issued, including shares held in treasury, respectively			1.9				1.9
Additional paid-in capital			1.2				1,617.5
Retained earnings			1,419.9				1,602.6
Treasury stock, at cost (874,042 and 0 shares, respectively)			(26.2	)			(1,800.8	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax			3.8				.9
Total Stockholders’ Equity			1,400.6				1,422.1
		$	4,410.6			$	4,429.4

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

REPUBLIC SERVICES, INC.

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(in millions, except per share data)

		Three Months Ended
		March 31,
		2007				2006
REVENUE		$	765.6			$	737.5
EXPENSES:
Cost of operations			486.7				456.4
Depreciation, amortization and depletion			79.0				73.1
Accretion			4.1				3.8
Selling, general and administrative			81.1				81.8
OPERATING INCOME			114.7				122.4
INTEREST EXPENSE			(24.0	)			(22.1	)
INTEREST INCOME			3.3				3.3
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE), NET			.4				.6
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES			94.4				104.2
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES			40.5				39.6
NET INCOME		$	53.9			$	64.6
BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE		$	.28			$	.32
WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING			193.7				202.1
DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE		$	.28			$	.31
WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON AND COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARES OUTSTANDING			195.6				205.1
CASH DIVIDENDS PER COMMON SHARE		$	.1067			$	.0933

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

REPUBLIC SERVICES, INC.

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(in millions)

																						Accumulated
		Common Stock								Additional												Other
		Shares,				Par				Paid-In				Retained				Treasury				Comprehensive				Comprehensive
		Net				Value				Capital				Earnings				Stock				Income				Income
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2006			194.5			$	1.9			$	1,617.5			$	1,602.6			$	(1,800.8	)		$	.9
Net income			—				—				—				53.9				—				—			$	53.9
Adoption of FIN 48			—				—				—				(5.6	)			—				—				—
Stock split			—				—				(1,635.0	)			(210.3	)			1,845.3				—				—
Cash dividends declared			—				—				—				(20.7	)			—				—				—
Issuances of common stock			.6				—				15.6				—				—				—				—
Issuances of restricted stock and deferred stock units			.1				—				—				—				—				—				—
Compensation expense for restricted stock and deferred stock units			—				—				1.6				—				—				—				—
Compensation expense for stock options			—				—				1.5				—				—				—				—
Purchases of common stock for treasury			(1.7	)			—				—				—				(70.7	)			—				—
Changes in value of derivative instruments, net of tax			—				—				—				—				—				2.9				2.9
Total comprehensive income			—				—				—				—				—				—			$	56.8
BALANCE AT MARCH 31, 2007			193.5			$	1.9			$	1.2			$	1,419.9			$	(26.2	)		$	3.8

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

REPUBLIC SERVICES, INC.

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in millions)

		Three Months Ended
		March 31,
		2007				2006
CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income		$	53.9			$	64.6
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment			46.9				44.1
Landfill depletion and amortization			30.2				27.2
Amortization of intangible and other assets			1.9				1.8
Accretion			4.1				3.8
Restricted stock and deferred stock unit compensation expense			1.6				3.1
Stock option compensation expense			1.5				1.9
Deferred tax provision			2.9				(.9	)
Provision for doubtful accounts			1.1				2.4
Income tax benefit from stock option exercises			4.3				7.0
(Gains) losses, net on sales of businesses			—				(.2	)
Other non-cash items			4.8				.1
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects from business acquisitions and dispositions:
Accounts receivable			(5.0	)			(.6	)
Prepaid expenses and other assets			(3.9	)			(7.8	)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities			(93.8	)			(83.5	)
Federal income taxes payable			25.6				(67.5	)
Other liabilities			23.1				8.7
			99.2				4.2
CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchases of property and equipment			(44.1	)			(90.5	)
Proceeds from sales of property and equipment			1.0				7.5
Cash used in business acquisitions, net of cash acquired			—				(3.2	)
Cash proceeds from business dispositions, net of cash disposed			.3				2.4
Change in amounts due and contingent payments to former owners			—				(.4	)
Change in restricted cash			11.3				(13.8	)
			(31.5	)			(98.0	)
CASH USED IN FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from notes payable and long-term debt			55.0				125.0
Payments of notes payable and long-term debt			(51.4	)			(41.3	)
Issuances of common stock			10.7				45.7
Excess income tax benefit from stock option exercises			.7				7.5
Purchases of common stock for treasury			(70.7	)			(140.6	)
Cash dividends paid			(20.8	)			(19.4	)
			(76.5	)			(23.1	)
DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS			(8.8	)			(116.9	)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD			29.1				131.8
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD		$	20.3			$	14.9

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

REPUBLIC SERVICES, INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All tables in millions, except per share data)

1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION

     Republic Services, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, the “Company”) is a leading provider of non-hazardous solid waste collection and disposal services in the United States.

     The accompanying Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of the Company and have been prepared by the Company pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. Certain information related to the Company’s organization, significant accounting policies and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted. In the opinion of management, these Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements reflect all material adjustments (which include only normal recurring adjustments) necessary to fairly state the financial position and the results of operations for the periods presented, and the disclosures herein are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. Operating results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results that can be expected for a full year. These interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto appearing in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.

     The Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and necessarily include amounts based on estimates and assumptions made by management. Actual results could differ from these amounts. Significant items subject to such estimates and assumptions include the depletion and amortization of landfill development costs, liabilities for final capping, closure and post-closure costs, valuation allowances for accounts receivable and deferred tax assets, liabilities for potential litigation, claims and assessments, and liabilities for environmental remediation, deferred taxes, uncertain tax positions and self-insurance.

     In January 2007, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a 3-for-2 stock split in the form of a stock dividend, effective on March 16, 2007, to stockholders of record as of March 5, 2007. The Company’s shares, per share data and weighted average common and common equivalent shares outstanding have been retroactively adjusted for all periods to reflect the stock split.

     The Company adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (“FIN 48”), which is an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes,” effective January 1, 2007. As a result of adopting the provisions of FIN 48, the Company recorded a $5.6 million cumulative adjustment to decrease beginning retained earnings in the first quarter 2007. In accordance with the transition requirements of FIN 48, results of prior periods have not been restated. (For further information, see Note 7, Income Taxes.)

     The following table summarizes the balance sheet impact of adopting FIN 48 as of January 1, 2007:

		Balance as of								Balance as of
		December 31,								January 1,
		2006				Change				2007
Assets:
Deferred tax assets		$	10.0			$	16.0			$	26.0
Liabilities:
Other current liabilities			142.9				(25.8	)			117.1
Deferred income taxes and other long-term tax liabilities			419.7				47.4				467.1
Stockholders’ Equity:
Retained earnings			1,602.6				(5.6	)			1,597.0

New Accounting Pronouncements

     In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS 157”), which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 will be effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2008. The Company is currently in the process of assessing the provisions of SFAS 157 and determining how this framework for measuring fair value will affect its current accounting policies and procedures and its financial statements. The Company has not determined whether the adoption of SFAS 157 will have a material impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements.

     In February 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (“SFAS 159”), which permits companies to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. This statement also establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between companies that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. SFAS 159 will be effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2008. At the effective date, a company may elect the fair value option for eligible items that exist at that date. The company shall report the effect of the first remeasurement to fair value as a cumulative effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings for the fiscal year in which this statement is initially applied. Upfront costs and fees related to items for which the fair value option is elected shall be recognized in earnings as incurred and not deferred. Subsequent unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected will be reported in earnings. The Company does not believe that SFAS 159 will have a material impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements.

     There are no other new accounting pronouncements that are significant to the Company.

2. LANDFILL AND ENVIRONMENTAL COSTS

Accrued Landfill and Environmental Costs

     A summary of landfill and environmental liabilities is as follows:

		March 31,				December 31,
		2007				2006
Landfill final capping, closure and post-closure liabilities		$	269.7			$	257.6
Remediation			59.8				45.1
			329.5				302.7
Less: Current portion (included in other current liabilities)			(52.3	)			(42.0	)
Long-term portion		$	277.2			$	260.7

Life Cycle Accounting

     The Company uses life cycle accounting and the units-of-consumption method to recognize certain landfill costs over the life of the site. In life cycle accounting, all costs to acquire and construct a site are capitalized, and charged to expense based on the consumption of cubic yards of available airspace. Costs and airspace estimates are developed at least annually by engineers. These estimates are used by the Company’s operating and accounting personnel to adjust the Company’s rates used to expense capitalized costs. Changes in these estimates primarily relate to changes in costs, timing of payments, available airspace, inflation and applicable regulations. Changes in available airspace include changes in engineering estimates and changes due to the addition of airspace lying in probable expansion areas.

Total Available Disposal Capacity

     As of March 31, 2007, the Company owned or operated 58 solid waste landfills with total available disposal capacity of approximately 1.8 billion in-place cubic yards. Total available disposal capacity represents the sum of estimated permitted airspace plus an estimate of expansion airspace that the Company believes has a probable likelihood of ultimately being permitted.

Probable Expansion Airspace

     Before airspace included in an expansion area is determined to be probable expansion airspace and, therefore, is included in the Company’s calculation of total available disposal capacity, the following criteria must be met:

	1.		The land associated with the expansion airspace is either owned by the Company or is controlled by the Company pursuant to an option agreement;
	2.		The Company is committed to supporting the expansion project financially and with appropriate resources;
	3.		There are no identified fatal flaws or impediments associated with the project, including political impediments;
	4.		Progress is being made on the project;
	5.		The expansion is attainable within a reasonable time frame; and
	6.		The Company believes it is likely the expansion permit will be received.

     Upon meeting the Company’s expansion criteria, the rates used at each applicable landfill to expense costs to acquire, construct, cap, close and maintain a site during the post-closure period are adjusted to include probable expansion airspace and all additional costs to be capitalized or accrued associated with the expansion airspace.

     The Company has identified three steps that landfills generally follow to obtain expansion permits. These steps are as follows:

	1.		Obtaining approval from local authorities;
	2.		Submitting a permit application to state authorities; and
	3.		Obtaining permit approval from state authorities.

     Once a landfill meets the Company’s expansion criteria, management continuously monitors each site’s progress in obtaining its expansion permit. If at any point it is determined that an expansion area no longer meets the required criteria, the probable expansion airspace is removed from the landfill’s total available capacity, and the rates used at the landfill to expense costs to acquire, construct, cap, close and maintain a site during the post-closure period are adjusted accordingly.

Capitalized Landfill Costs

     Capitalized landfill costs include expenditures for land, permitting costs, cell construction costs and environmental structures. Capitalized permitting and cell construction costs are limited to direct costs relating to these activities, including legal, engineering and construction costs associated with excavation, natural and synthetic liners, construction of leachate collection systems, installation of methane gas collection and monitoring systems, installation of groundwater monitoring wells and other costs associated with the development of the site. Interest is capitalized on landfill construction projects while the assets are undergoing activities to ready them for their intended use. Capitalized landfill costs also include final capping, closure and post-closure assets accrued in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations” (“SFAS 143”), as discussed below.

     Costs related to acquiring land, excluding the estimated residual value of unpermitted, non-buffer land, and costs related to permitting and cell construction are depleted as airspace is consumed using the units-of-consumption method.

     Capitalized landfill costs may also include an allocation of purchase price paid for landfills. For landfills purchased as part of a group of assets, the purchase price assigned to the landfill is determined based on the discounted future expected cash flows of the landfill relative to the other assets within the acquired group. If the landfill meets the Company’s expansion criteria, the purchase price is further allocated between permitted airspace and expansion airspace based on the ratio of permitted versus probable expansion airspace to total available airspace. Landfill purchase price is amortized using the units-of-consumption method over the total available airspace including probable expansion airspace where appropriate.

Final Capping, Closure and Post-Closure Costs

     The Company accounts for final capping, closure and post-closure in accordance with SFAS 143.

     The Company has future obligations for final capping, closure and post-closure costs with respect to the landfills it owns or operates as set forth in applicable landfill permits. Final capping, closure and post-closure costs include estimated costs to be incurred for final capping and closure of landfills and estimated costs for providing required post-closure monitoring and maintenance of landfills. The permit requirements are based on the Subtitle C and Subtitle D regulations of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), as implemented and applied on a state-by-state basis. Obligations associated with monitoring and controlling methane gas migration and emissions are set forth in applicable landfill permits and these requirements are based on the provisions of the Clean Air Act of 1970, as amended. Final capping typically includes installing flexible membrane and geosynthetic clay liners, drainage and compact soil layers, and topsoil, and is constructed over an area of the landfill where total airspace capacity has been consumed and waste disposal operations have ceased. These final capping activities occur as needed throughout the operating life of a landfill. Closure activities and post-closure activities occur after the entire landfill ceases to accept waste and closes. These activities involve methane gas control, leachate management and groundwater monitoring, surface water monitoring and control, and other operational and maintenance activities that occur after the site ceases to accept waste. The post-closure period generally runs for up to 30 years after final site closure for municipal solid waste landfills and a shorter period for construction and demolition landfills and inert landfills.

     Estimates of future expenditures for final capping, closure and post-closure are developed at least annually by engineers. These estimates are reviewed by management and are used by the Company’s operating and accounting personnel to adjust the rates used to capitalize and amortize these costs. These estimates involve projections of costs that will be incurred during the remaining life of the landfill for final capping activities, after the landfill ceases operations and during the legally required post-closure monitoring period. Additionally, the Company currently retains post-closure responsibility for several closed landfills.

     Under SFAS 143, a liability for an asset retirement obligation must be recognized in the period in which it is incurred and should be initially measured at fair value. Absent quoted market prices, the estimate of fair value should be based on the best available information, including the results of present value techniques in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts No. 7, “Using Cash Flow and Present Value in Accounting Measurements” (“SFAC 7”). The offset to the liability must be capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset. Changes in the liability due to the passage of time are recognized as operating items in the income statement and are referred to as accretion expense. Changes in the liability due to revisions of estimated future cash flows are recognized by increasing or decreasing the liability with the offset adjusting the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset. In certain cases, these adjustments affect amortization expense and accumulated amortization as well.

     In applying the provisions of SFAS 143, the Company has concluded that a landfill’s asset retirement obligation includes estimates of all costs related to final capping, closure and post-closure. Costs associated with a landfill’s daily maintenance activities during the operating life of the landfill, such as leachate disposal, groundwater and gas monitoring, and other pollution control activities, are charged to expense as incurred. In addition, costs historically accounted for as capital expenditures during the operating life of a landfill, such as cell development costs, are capitalized when incurred, and charged to expense using life cycle accounting and the units-of-consumption method based on the consumption of cubic yards of available airspace.

     The Company defines final capping as activities required to permanently cover a portion of a landfill that has been completely filled with waste. Final capping occurs in phases throughout the operating life of a landfill as specific areas are filled to capacity and the final elevation for that specific area is reached in accordance with the provisions of the operating permit. The Company considers final capping events to be discrete activities that are recognized as asset retirement obligations separately from other closure and post-closure obligations. These capping events occur generally during the operating life of a landfill and can be associated with waste actually placed under an area to be capped. As a result, the Company uses a separate rate per ton for recognizing the principal amount of the liability and related asset associated with each capping event. The Company amortizes the asset recorded pursuant to this approach as waste volume equivalent to the capacity covered by the capping event is placed into the landfill based on the consumption of cubic yards of available airspace covered by the capping event.

     The Company recognizes asset retirement obligations and the related amortization expense for closure and post-closure (excluding obligations for final capping) using the units-of-consumption method over the total remaining capacity of the landfill. The total remaining capacity includes probable expansion airspace.

     In general, the Company engages third parties to perform most of its final capping, closure and post-closure activities. Accordingly, the fair market value of these obligations is based on quoted and actual prices paid for similar work. The Company does intend to perform some of its final capping, closure and post-closure activities using internal resources. Where internal resources are expected to be used to fulfill an asset retirement obligation, the Company has added a profit margin onto the estimated cost of such services to better reflect their fair market value as required by SFAS 143. These services primarily relate to managing construction activities during final capping and maintenance activities during closure and post-closure. If the Company does perform these services internally, the added profit margin would be recognized as a component of operating income in the period the obligation is settled.

     SFAC 7 states that an estimate of fair value should include the price that marketplace participants are able to receive for bearing the uncertainties in cash flows. However, when utilizing discounted cash flow techniques, reliable estimates of market premiums may not be obtainable. In this situation, SFAC 7 indicates that it is not necessary to consider a market risk premium in the determination of expected cash flows. While the cost of asset retirement obligations associated with final capping, closure and post-closure can be quantified and estimated, there is not an active market that can be utilized to determine the fair value of these activities. In the case of the waste industry, no market exists for selling the responsibility for final capping, closure and post-closure independent of selling the landfill in its entirety. Accordingly, the Company believes that it is not possible to develop a methodology to reliably estimate a market risk premium and has excluded a market risk premium from its determination of expected cash flow for landfill asset retirement obligations in accordance with SFAC 7.

     The Company’s estimates of costs to discharge asset retirement obligations for landfills are developed in today’s dollars. These costs are inflated each year to reflect a normal escalation of prices up to the year they are expected to be paid. The Company uses a 2.5% inflation rate, which is based on the ten-year historical moving average increase in the U.S. Consumer Price Index and is the rate used by most waste industry participants.

     These estimated costs are then discounted to their present value using a credit-adjusted, risk-free rate. The Company’s credit-adjusted, risk-free rate for liability recognition was determined to be 6.4% and 6.1% for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, based on the estimated all-in yield the Company believes it would need to offer to sell thirty-year debt in the public market. Changes in asset retirement obligations due to the passage of time are measured by recognizing accretion expense in a manner that results in a constant effective interest rate being applied to the average carrying amount of the liability. The effective interest rate used to calculate accretion expense is the Company’s credit-adjusted, risk-free rate in effect at the time the liabilities were recorded.

     In accordance with SFAS 143, changes due to revision of the estimates of the amount or timing of the original undiscounted cash flows used to record a liability are recognized by increasing or decreasing the carrying amount of the asset retirement obligation liability and the carrying amount of the related asset. Upward revisions in the amount of undiscounted estimated cash flows used to record a liability must be discounted using the credit-adjusted, risk-free rate in effect at the time of the change. Downward revisions in the amount of undiscounted estimated cash flows used to record a liability must be discounted using the credit-adjusted, risk-free rate that was in effect when the original liability was recognized.

     The Company reviews its calculations with respect to landfill asset retirement obligations at least annually. If there is a significant change in the facts and circumstances related to a landfill during the year, the Company will review its calculations for the landfill as soon as practical after the significant change has occurred. During the three months ended March 31, 2007, the Company reviewed its landfill retirement obligations for certain of its landfills and recorded an increase of $5.0 million in amortization expense. The Company intends to conduct annual reviews of its landfill asset retirement obligations during the fourth quarter of each year.

     The following table summarizes the activity in the Company’s asset retirement obligation liabilities for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006:

		Three Months
		Ended March 31,
		2007				2006
Asset retirement obligation liability, beginning of year		$	257.6			$	239.5
Non-cash asset additions			4.5				5.6
Revisions in estimates of future cash flows			5.6				—
Amounts settled during the period			(2.1	)			(.4	)
Accretion expense			4.1				3.8
Asset retirement obligation liability, end of period			269.7				248.5
Less: Current portion (included in other current liabilities)			(26.9	)			(26.6	)
Long-term portion		$	242.8			$	221.9

     The fair value of assets that are legally restricted for purposes of settling final capping, closure and post-closure obligations was $9.6 million at March 31, 2007 and is included in restricted cash in the Company’s Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Remediation

     The Company accrues for remediation costs when they become probable and reasonably estimable. Substantially all of the Company’s recorded remediation costs are for incremental work to be performed under approved remediation action plans. Remediation costs are estimated by engineers. These estimates do not take into account discounts for the present value of total estimated costs. Management believes that the amounts accrued for remediation costs are adequate. However, a significant increase in the estimated costs for remediation could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

     During the three months ended March 31, 2007, the Company recorded a pre-tax charge of $22.0 million, of which $19.9 million was recorded for remediation costs related to costs to comply with Final Findings and Orders (the “F&Os”) issued by the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency in response to environmental conditions at the Company’s Countywide Recycling and Disposal Facility in East Sparta, Ohio (“Countywide”). The remaining $2.1 million of the pre-tax charge consists of landfill amortization expense related to changes in estimates and assumptions concerning the cost and timing of future final capping, closure and post-closure activities in accordance with SFAS 143. The Company will adjust this charge, if necessary, to reflect the effects of new or additional information, to the extent that such information impacts the costs, timing or duration of the required actions. While the Company intends to vigorously pursue financial contribution from third parties for its costs to comply with the F&Os, the Company has not recorded any receivables for potential recoveries.

     No other significant amounts were charged to income for remediation costs during the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006.

Environmental Operating Costs

     In the normal course of business, the Company incurs various operating costs associated with environmental compliance. These costs include, among other things, leachate treatment and disposal, methane gas and groundwater monitoring and systems maintenance, interim cap maintenance, costs associated with the application of daily cover materials, and the legal and administrative costs of ongoing environmental compliance.

3. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

     Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Expenditures for major additions and improvements to facilities are capitalized, while maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. When property is retired or otherwise disposed of, the related cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is reflected in the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.

     The Company revises the estimated useful lives of property and equipment acquired through business acquisitions to conform with its policies regarding property and equipment. Depreciation is provided over the estimated useful lives of the assets involved using the straight-line method. The estimated useful lives are seven to forty years for buildings and

improvements, five to twelve years for vehicles, seven to ten years for most landfill equipment, three to fifteen years for all other equipment, and five to twelve years for furniture and fixtures.

     Landfill development costs are stated at cost and are amortized or depleted based on consumed airspace. Landfill development costs include direct costs incurred to obtain landfill permits and direct costs incurred to acquire, construct and develop sites as well as final capping, closure and post-closure assets accrued in accordance with SFAS 143. These costs are amortized or depleted based on consumed airspace. All indirect landfill development costs are expensed as incurred. (For further information, see Note 2, Landfill and Environmental Costs.)

     The Company capitalizes interest on landfill cell construction and other construction projects in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 34, “Capitalization of Interest Cost.” Construction projects must meet the following criteria before interest is capitalized:

	1.		Total construction costs are $50,000 or greater,
	2.		The construction phase is one month or longer, and
	3.		The assets have a useful life of one year or longer.

     Interest is capitalized on qualified assets while they undergo activities to ready them for their intended use. Capitalization of interest ceases once an asset is placed into service or if construction activity is suspended for more than a brief period of time. The interest capitalization rate is based on the Company’s weighted average cost of indebtedness. Interest capitalized was $.6 million and $.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

     A summary of property and equipment is as follows:

		March 31,				December 31,
		2007				2006
Other land		$	105.9			$	105.9
Non-depletable landfill land			52.7				52.7
Landfill development costs			1,750.6				1,722.2
Vehicles and equipment			1,909.9				1,886.8
Buildings and improvements			307.8				307.5
Construction-in-progress — landfill			54.1				61.1
Construction-in-progress — other			10.6				12.3
			4,191.6				4,148.5
Less: Accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization — Landfill development costs			(960.8	)			(930.6	)
Vehicles and equipment			(996.7	)			(963.5	)
Buildings and improvements			(93.6	)			(90.6	)
			(2,051.1	)			(1,984.7	)
Property and equipment, net		$	2,140.5			$	2,163.8

     The Company periodically evaluates whether events and circumstances have occurred that may warrant revision of the estimated useful life of property and equipment or whether the remaining balance of property and equipment should be evaluated for possible impairment. The following are examples of such events or changes in circumstances:

	•		A significant decrease in the market price of a long-lived asset or asset group,
	•		A significant adverse change in the extent or manner in which a long-lived asset or asset group is being used or in its physical condition,
	•		A significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate that could affect the value of a long-lived asset or asset group, including an adverse action or assessment by a regulator,
	•		An accumulation of costs significantly in excess of the amount originally expected for the acquisition or construction of a long-lived asset or asset group,

	•		A current-period operating or cash flow loss combined with a history of operating or cash flow losses or a projection or forecast that demonstrates continuing losses associated with the use of a long-lived asset or asset group, or
	•		A current expectation that, more likely than not, a long-lived asset or asset group will be sold or otherwise disposed of significantly before the end of its previously estimated useful life.

     There are certain indicators listed above that require significant judgment and understanding of the waste industry when applied to landfill development or expansion. For example, a regulator may initially deny a landfill expansion permit application though the expansion permit is ultimately granted. In addition, management may periodically divert waste from one landfill to another to conserve remaining permitted landfill airspace. Therefore, certain events could occur in the ordinary course of business and not necessarily be considered indicators of impairment due to the unique nature of the waste industry.

     The Company uses an estimate of the related undiscounted cash flows over the remaining life of the property and equipment in assessing their recoverability. The Company measures impairment loss as the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset.

4. BUSINESS COMBINATIONS

     The Company acquires businesses as part of its growth strategy. Businesses acquired are accounted for under the purchase method of accounting and are included in the Consolidated Financial Statements from the date of acquisition. The Company allocates the cost of the acquired business to the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed based on estimates of fair values thereof. These estimates are revised during the allocation period as necessary if, and when, information regarding contingencies becomes available to further define and quantify assets acquired and liabilities assumed. To the extent contingencies such as preacquisition environmental matters, litigation and related legal fees are resolved or settled during the allocation period, such items are included in the revised allocation of the purchase price. After the allocation period, the effect of changes in such contingencies is included in results of operations in the periods in which the adjustments are determined. The Company does not believe potential differences between its fair value estimates and actual fair values are material.

     The Company acquired various solid waste businesses during the three months ended March 31, 2006. The aggregate purchase price paid for these transactions was $3.2 million.

5. GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS

     Intangible assets consist of the cost of acquired businesses in excess of the fair value of net assets acquired (goodwill) and other intangible assets. Other intangible assets include values assigned to customer relationships, long-term contracts and covenants not to compete and are amortized generally over periods ranging from 6 to 10 years.

     The following table summarizes the activity in the intangible asset and the related accumulated amortization accounts for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006:

		Gross Intangible Assets
		Goodwill				Other				Total
Balance, December 31, 2006		$	1,704.6			$	66.6			$	1,771.2
Acquisitions			(.1	)			—				(.1	)
Divestitures			(.1	)			—				(.1	)
Balance, March 31, 2007		$	1,704.4			$	66.6			$	1,771.0

		Accumulated Amortization
		Goodwill				Other				Total
Balance, December 31, 2006		$	(141.7	)		$	(35.6	)		$	(177.3	)
Amortization expense			—				(1.5	)			(1.5	)
Balance, March 31, 2007		$	(141.7	)		$	(37.1	)		$	(178.8	)

		Gross Intangible Assets
		Goodwill				Other				Total
Balance, December 31, 2005		$	1,705.6			$	56.8			$	1,762.4
Acquisitions			1.2				—				1.2
Divestitures			(.5	)			—				(.5	)
Balance, March 31, 2006		$	1,706.3			$	56.8			$	1,763.1

		Accumulated Amortization
		Goodwill				Other				Total
Balance, December 31, 2005		$	(141.8	)		$	(29.8	)		$	(171.6	)
Amortization expense			—				(1.5	)			(1.5	)
Divestitures			.1				—				.1
Balance, March 31, 2006		$	(141.7	)		$	(31.3	)		$	(173.0	)

     Goodwill is tested for impairment on at least an annual basis. In testing for impairment, the Company estimates the fair value of each operating segment and compares the fair values with the carrying values. If the fair value of an operating segment is greater than its carrying value, then no impairment results. If the fair value is less than its carrying value, then the Company would determine the fair value of the goodwill. The fair value of goodwill is determined by deducting the fair value of an operating segment’s identifiable assets and liabilities from the fair value of the operating segment as a whole, as if that operating segment had just been acquired and the purchase price were being initially allocated. If the fair value of the goodwill were less than its carrying value for a segment, an impairment charge would be recorded to earnings in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Income.

     In addition, the Company would evaluate an operating segment for impairment if events or circumstances change between annual tests indicating a possible impairment. Examples of such events or circumstances include the following:

	•		A significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate,
	•		An adverse action or assessment by a regulator,
	•		A more likely than not expectation that a segment or a significant portion thereof will be sold, or
	•		The testing for recoverability under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets,” of a significant asset group within the segment.

     The Company did not record an impairment charge as a result of its goodwill impairment test in 2006. However, there can be no assurance that goodwill will not be impaired at any time in the future.

6. DEBT

     Notes payable and long-term debt are as follows:

		March 31,				December 31,
		2007				2006
$99.3 million unsecured notes; interest payable semi-annually in May and November at 7.125%; principal due at maturity in 2009		$	99.3			$	99.3
$450.0 million unsecured notes, net of unamortized discount of $1.3 million and $1.4 million, and including $4.7 million and $6.0 million of adjustments to fair market value related to the interest rate swap as of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively; interest payable semi-annually in February and August at 6.75%; principal due at maturity in 2011			444.0				442.6
$275.7 million unsecured notes, net of unamortized discount of $.2 million and including unamortized premium of $27.1 million as of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006; interest payable semi-annually in March and September at 6.086%; principal due at maturity in 2035			248.4				248.4
$750.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility; interest payable using LIBOR-based rates; maturing in 2010			50.0				45.0
Tax-exempt bonds and other tax-exempt financing; fixed and floating interest rates based on prevailing market rates; maturities ranging from 2012 to 2037			673.3				674.2
Other debt; unsecured and secured by real property, equipment and other assets			37.2				37.7
			1,552.2				1,547.2
Less: Current portion			(2.5	)			(2.6	)
Long-term portion		$	1,549.7			$	1,544.6

      As of March 31, 2007, the Company had $50.0 million of LIBOR-based borrowings and $442.7 million of letters of credit outstanding under its $750.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility, leaving $257.3 million of availability under the facility. The unsecured revolving credit facility requires the Company to maintain certain financial ratios and comply with certain financial covenants. The Company has the ability under its loan covenants to pay dividends and repurchase its common stock under the condition that it is in compliance with the covenants. At March 31, 2007, the Company was in compliance with the financial covenants under these agreements. During April 2007, the Company increased its unsecured revolving credit facility to $1.0 billion and extended the term to 2012.

     Approximately two-thirds of the Company’s tax-exempt bonds and other tax-exempt financings are remarketed weekly by a remarketing agent to effectively maintain a variable yield. If the remarketing agent is unable to remarket the bonds, then the bonds can be put back to the Company. These bonds have been classified as long-term because they are supported by letters of credit issued under the Company’s long-term revolving line of credit or due to the Company’s ability and intent to refinance these bonds using availability under its revolving line of credit, if necessary.

     As of March 31, 2007, the Company had $142.0 million of restricted cash, of which $53.9 million represents proceeds from the issuance of tax-exempt bonds and other tax-exempt financings that will be used to fund capital expenditures. Restricted cash also includes amounts held in trust as a financial guarantee of the Company’s performance.

     Interest paid was approximately $31.7 million (net of capitalized interest of $.6 million) and $30.7 million (net of capitalized interest of $.3 million) for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

     Other debt includes a $35.9 million capital lease liability as of March 31, 2007 related to a landfill.

     The Company’s ability to obtain financing through the capital markets is a key component of its financial strategy. Historically, the Company has managed risk associated with executing this strategy, particularly as it relates to fluctuations in interest rates, by using a combination of fixed and floating rate debt. The Company has also entered into interest rate swap agreements to manage risk associated with fluctuations in interest rates and to take advantage of favorable floating interest rates. The outstanding swap agreements have a total notional value of $210.0 million and mature in August 2011.

This maturity is identical to the Company’s public notes that were sold in 2001. Under the swap agreements, the Company pays interest at floating rates based on changes in LIBOR and receives interest at fixed rates of 6.75%. The Company has designated these agreements as hedges in changes in the fair value of the Company’s hedged fixed-rate debt and accounts for them in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“SFAS 133”). The Company has determined that these agreements qualify for the short-cut method under SFAS 133 and, therefore, changes in the fair value of the agreements are assumed to be perfectly effective in hedging changes in the fair value of the Company’s hedged fixed rate debt due to changes in interest rates.

     As of March 31, 2007, the interest rate swap agreements are reflected at a fair market value of $4.7 million and are included in other liabilities and as an adjustment to long-term debt in the accompanying Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. During the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, the Company recorded net interest expense of $.6 million and $.5 million, respectively, related to its interest rate swap agreements which is included in interest expense in the accompanying Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.

7. INCOME TAXES

     Income taxes have been provided for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 based on the Company’s anticipated annual effective income tax rate. Income tax expense for the three months ended March 31, 2007 also includes a $4.2 million charge related to the resolution of various income tax matters. Income taxes paid (net of refunds received) were $.4 million and $92.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

     In July 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (“FIN 48”), which is an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for income taxes by prescribing the minimum recognition threshold a tax position is required to meet before being recognized in the financial statements. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, measurement, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods and transition, and requires expanded disclosure with respect to the uncertainty in income taxes. The Company adopted the provisions of FIN 48 effective January 1, 2007. The cumulative effect of the adoption of the recognition and measurement provisions of FIN 48 resulted in a $5.6 million reduction to the January 1, 2007 balance of retained earnings.

     As of January 1, 2007, the Company had approximately $56.4 million of total gross unrecognized tax benefits. Of this total, approximately $7.6 million (net of the federal benefit on state issues) represents the amount of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect the effective income tax rate in any future periods.

     The Company’s policy for interest and penalties under FIN 48 related to income tax exposures was not impacted as a result of the adoption and measurement provisions of FIN 48. The Company continues to recognize interest and penalties as incurred within the provision for income taxes in the Consolidated Statements of Income. The Company has recorded a liability of $12.4 million for interest and penalties, which is included as a component of the liabilities for uncertain tax positions at January 1, 2007. To the extent interest and penalties are not assessed with respect to uncertain tax positions, amounts accrued will be reduced and reflected as a reduction of the overall income tax provision.

     The Company and its subsidiaries are subject to U.S. federal income tax as well as to income tax in multiple state jurisdictions. The Company has effectively concluded all U.S. federal income tax matters for years through 2000. The Internal Revenue Service is currently examining the Company’s consolidated tax returns for fiscal years 2001 through 2004. All significant state and local income tax matters have been effectively concluded for years through 2000.

     To date, the Internal Revenue Service has proposed, and management has agreed to, certain adjustments related to tax returns under examination that management expects will not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations. Unrecognized tax benefits for the examinations in progress were $10.3 million as of January 1, 2007. Based on the outcome of these examinations, or as a result of the expiration of the statute of limitations for specific jurisdictions, it is reasonably possible that the related unrecognized tax benefits for tax positions taken in previously filed tax returns will materially change from those recorded as liabilities for uncertain tax positions in the Company’s financial statements. However, based on the status of these examinations, and the protocol of finalizing audits by the relevant taxing authorities, it is not possible to estimate the impact of any amount of such changes. Any such changes will be recorded prospectively. It is expected that the unrecognized tax benefits related to the examinations will be settled in 2007. The unrecognized tax benefits that are expected to be settled primarily relate to depreciation and tax credits.

8. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

     In July 1998, the Company adopted the 1998 Stock Incentive Plan (“Stock Incentive Plan”) to provide for grants of options to purchase shares of common stock, restricted stock and other equity-based compensation to employees and non-employee directors of the Company who are eligible to participate in the Stock Incentive Plan. The Company believes that such awards better align the interests of its employees with those of its stockholders. As of March 31, 2007, there were 3.4 million shares reserved for future grants under the Stock Incentive Plan.

     Options granted under the Stock Incentive Plan are non-qualified and are granted at a price equal to the fair market value of the Company’s common stock at the date of grant. Generally, options granted have a term of seven to ten years from the date of grant, and vest in increments of 25% per year over a four year period beginning on the first anniversary date of the grant. Options granted to non-employee directors have a term of ten years and are fully vested at the grant date.

A summary of stock option activity for the three months ended March 31, 2007 is as follows:

						Weighted-Average
		Stock Options				Exercise Price
Outstanding at December 31, 2006.			8.6			$	16.76
Granted			1.3				29.31
Exercised (a)			(.8	)			12.73
Outstanding at March 31, 2007			9.1			$	19.02
Exercisable at March 31, 2007 (b)			6.7			$	15.83

     As a result of adopting Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS 123(R)”), effective January 1, 2006, the Company recorded $1.5 million and $.9 million of equity-based compensation expense for stock options during the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123(R), the Company accelerated the vesting of all of its outstanding stock options previously awarded to employees as approved by the Company’s Board of Directors effective December 30, 2005. Consequently, no additional compensation expense will be recognized under SFAS 123(R) for these options.

     SFAS 123(R) requires that cash flows resulting from tax benefits related to tax deductions in excess of those recorded for compensation expense (either on a pro forma or an actual basis) be classified as cash flows from financing activities. As a result, the Company classified $.7 million and $7.5 million of its excess tax benefits as cash flows from financing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. All other tax benefits related to stock options have been presented as a component of cash flows from operating activities.

     The Company uses a lattice binomial option-pricing model to value its stock option grants. The Company recognizes compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for each separately vesting portion of the award, or to the employee’s retirement eligible date, if earlier. The weighted-average estimated fair values of stock options granted during the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 was $6.49 and $6.23 per option, respectively, which were calculated using the following weighted-average assumptions:

		Three Months
		Ended March 31,
		2007				2006
Expected volatility			23.5	%			26.7	%
Risk-free interest rate			4.8	%			4.6	%
Dividend yield			1.5	%			1.4	%
Expected life		4.0 years				4.2 years
Contractual life		7 years				7 years
Estimated forfeiture rate			5.0	%			5.0	%

     Expected volatilities are based on the Company’s historical stock prices over the contractual terms of the options and other factors. The risk-free interest rates used are based on the published U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of the grant for instruments with a similar life. The dividend yield reflects the Company’s dividend yield at the date of grant. The expected life represents the period that the stock options are expected to be outstanding, taking into consideration the contractual terms of the options and the Company’s employees’ historical exercise and post-vesting employment termination behavior, weighted to reflect the job level demographic profile of the employees receiving the option grants. The estimated forfeiture rate is based on historical forfeitures and is adjusted periodically based on actual results.

     As of March 31, 2007, there was $11.4 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to outstanding stock options that will be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.9 years.

     During the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, the Company awarded 36,000 deferred stock units to its non-employee directors under its Stock Incentive Plan. These stock units vest immediately, but the directors receive the underlying shares only after their Board service ends. The stock units do not carry any voting or dividend rights, except the right to receive additional stock units in lieu of dividends.

     Also during the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, the Company awarded 186,000 and 127,500 shares of restricted stock, respectively, to its executive officers. 21,000 and 19,500 of the shares awarded during 2007 and 2006, respectively, vest effective January 1 of the subsequent year. 135,000 and 108,000 of the shares awarded vest in four equal annual installments beginning on the anniversary date of the original grant except that vesting may be accelerated if certain performance targets are achieved. The remaining shares awarded during 2007 vest effective December 31, 2008. During the vesting period, the participants have voting rights and receive dividends declared and paid on the shares, but the shares may not be sold, assigned, transferred or otherwise encumbered. Additionally, granted but unvested shares are forfeited in the event the participant resigns employment with the Company for other than good reason.

     The fair value of stock units and restricted stock on the date of grant is amortized ratably over the vesting period, or the accelerated vesting period if certain performance targets are achieved. During the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, compensation expense related to stock units and restricted stock of $1.6 million and $3.1 million, respectively, was recorded in the Company’s Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. The compensation expense for restricted stock recorded during the three months ended March 31, 2006 includes $1.8 million of incremental expense for accelerating the expense recognition period for grants to employees that are or will become retirement-eligible during the stated vesting period of the restricted stock as required under SFAS 123(R).

     A summary of deferred stock unit and restricted stock activity for the three months ended March 31, 2007 is as follows:

		Deferred Stock				Weighted-Average
		Units and				Grant Date
		Restricted Stock				Fair Value
		(in thousands)				per Share
Unissued at December 31, 2006			289.0			$	23.42
Granted			235.9				29.31
Vested and issued			(127.5	)			23.71
Unissued at March 31, 2007			397.4			$	26.82
Vested and unissued at March 31, 2007			107.9			$	21.80

9. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND EARNINGS PER SHARE

     From 2000 through March 31, 2007, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $2,050.0 million of the Company’s common stock. As of March 31, 2007, the Company had paid $1,871.5 million to repurchase 65.4 million shares of its common stock of which 1.7 million shares were acquired during the three months ended March 31, 2007 for $70.7 million.

     In January 2007, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a 3-for-2 stock split in the form of a stock dividend, effective on March 16, 2007 to stockholders of record as of March 5, 2007. The Company distributed 64.5 million shares from treasury stock to effect the stock split. In connection therewith, the Company transferred $1.6 billion from treasury stock to additional paid-in capital and $.2 billion from treasury stock to retained earnings, representing the weighted average cost of the treasury shares distributed.

     In July 2003, the Company announced that its Board of Directors initiated a quarterly cash dividend of $.04 per share. The dividend was increased to $.08 per share in the third quarter of 2004, to $.0933 per share in the third quarter of 2005 and to $.1067 per share in the third quarter of 2006. In January 2007, the Company paid a dividend of $20.8 million to stockholders of record as of January 2, 2007. As of March 31, 2007, the Company recorded a dividend payable of $20.7 million to stockholders of record at the close of business on April 2, 2007. In April 2007, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a regular quarterly dividend of $.1067 per share payable to stockholders of record as of July 2, 2007.

     Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares (including vested but unissued deferred stock units and restricted stock) outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is based on the combined weighted average number of common shares and common share equivalents outstanding which include, where appropriate, the assumed exercise of employee stock options and unvested restricted stock awards. In computing diluted earnings per share, the Company utilizes the treasury stock method.

     Earnings per share for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 is calculated as follows (in thousands, except per share data):

		Three Months
		Ended March 31,
		2007				2006
Numerator:
Net income		$	53,900			$	64,600
Denominator:
Denominator for basic earnings per share			193,660				202,083
Effect of dilutive securities —
Options to purchase common stock			1,976				2,966
Unvested restricted stock awards			1				7
Denominator for diluted earnings per share			195,637				205,056
Basic earnings per share		$	.28			$	.32
Diluted earnings per share		$	.28			$	.31
Antidilutive securities not included in the diluted earnings per share calculation:
Options to purchase common stock			1,399				1,389
Weighted-average exercise price		$	29.27			$	26.00

10. OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

     During January 2007, the Company entered into option agreements related to forecasted diesel fuel purchases. Under SFAS 133, the options qualified for and were designated as effective hedges of changes in the prices of forecasted diesel fuel purchases. These option agreements commence on January 1, 2008 and settle each month in equal notional amounts of 500,000 gallons through December 31, 2010. In accordance with SFAS 133, $2.0 million representing the effective portion of the change in fair value as of March 31, 2007, net of tax, has been recorded in stockholders’ equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income. The ineffective portion of the change in fair value was not material and has been recorded in other income (expense), net in the Company’s Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the three months ended March 31, 2007.

     During September 2006, the Company entered into option agreements related to forecasted diesel fuel purchases. Under SFAS 133, the options qualified for and were designated as effective hedges of changes in the prices of forecasted diesel fuel purchases. These option agreements commenced on October 2, 2006 and settle each month in equal notional amounts of 500,000 gallons through December 31, 2007. In accordance with SFAS 133, $.5 million representing the effective portion of the change in fair value as of March 31, 2007, net of tax, has been recorded in stockholders’ equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income. The ineffective portion of the change in fair value was not material and has been recorded in other income (expense), net in the Company’s Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the three months ended March 31, 2007. Realized losses of $.9 million related to these option agreements are included in cost of operations in the Company’s Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the three months ended March 31, 2007.

     During October 2005, the Company entered into option agreements related to forecasted diesel fuel purchases. Under SFAS 133, the options qualified for and were designated as effective hedges of changes in the prices of forecasted diesel fuel purchases. These option agreements commenced on January 1, 2006 and settled each month in equal notional amounts of 500,000 gallons through December 31, 2006. In accordance with SFAS 133, $.3 million representing the effective portion of the change in fair value as of March 31, 2006, net of tax, has been recorded in stockholders’ equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income. The ineffective portion of the change in fair value was not material and has been recorded in other income (expense), net in the Company’s Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. Realized losses of $.2 million related to these option agreements are included in cost of operations in the Company’s Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the three months ended March 31, 2006.

11. SEGMENT INFORMATION

     The Company’s operations are managed and evaluated through five regions: Eastern, Central, Southern, Southwestern and Western. These five regions are presented below as the Company’s reportable segments. These reportable segments provide integrated waste management services consisting of collection, transfer and disposal of domestic non-hazardous solid waste.

     Summarized financial information concerning the Company’s reportable segments for the respective three months ended March 31 is shown in the following table:

														Depreciation,
														Amortization,				Operating
		Gross				Intercompany				Net				Depletion and				Income				Capital				Total
2007		Revenue				Revenue (b)				Revenue				Accretion				(Loss)				Expenditures				Assets
Eastern Region (c) (d)		$	159.9			$	(22.3	)		$	137.6			$	14.2			$	6.7			$	5.2			$	877.3
Central Region			189.5				(40.1	)			149.4				21.3				23.4				4.6				1,112.6
Southern Region			227.0				(23.3	)			203.7				17.9				43.7				12.5				891.9
Southwestern Region			96.8				(11.5	)			85.3				8.3				15.5				6.1				446.2
Western Region (c)			238.7				(49.3	)			189.4				19.6				43.9				8.7				855.1
Corporate Entities (a)			.2				—				.2				1.8				(18.5	)			7.0				227.5
Total		$	912.1			$	(146.5	)		$	765.6			$	83.1			$	114.7			$	44.1			$	4,410.6

														Depreciation,
														Amortization,				Operating
		Gross				Intercompany				Net				Depletion and				Income				Capital			Total
2006		Revenue				Revenue (b)				Revenue				Accretion				(Loss)				Expenditures			Assets
Eastern Region		$	158.4			$	(22.8	)		$	135.6			$	10.8			$	25.3			$	5.6			$	877.5
Central Region			190.1				(42.0	)			148.1				22.9				26.2				6.7				1,118.2
Southern Region			216.1				(22.3	)			193.8				18.2				36.9				9.5				886.4
Southwestern Region			92.5				(10.4	)			82.1				8.8				13.5				6.9				453.7
Western Region			222.5				(44.2	)			178.3				14.8				39.1				7.6				823.2
Corporate Entities (a)			(.4	)			—				(.4	)			1.4				(18.6	)			54.2				312.5
Total		$	879.2			$	(141.7	)		$	737.5			$	76.9			$	122.4			$	90.5			$	4,471.5

     Total revenue of the Company by revenue source for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 is as follows:

		Three Months
		Ended March 31,
		2007				2006 (a)
Collection:
Residential		$	195.8			$	183.5
Commercial			230.4				214.0
Industrial			155.7				157.6
Other			4.8				6.1
Total collection			586.7				561.2
Transfer and disposal			278.8				277.9
Less: Intercompany			(145.0	)			(140.5	)
Transfer and disposal, net			133.8				137.4
Other			45.1				38.9
Revenue		$	765.6			$	737.5

12. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Legal Proceedings

     The Company is a party to various general legal proceedings which have arisen in the ordinary course of business. While the results of these matters cannot be predicted with certainty, the Company believes that losses, if any, resulting from the ultimate resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. However, unfavorable resolution could affect the consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows for the quarterly periods in which they are resolved.

Lease Commitments

     The Company and its subsidiaries lease real property, equipment and software under various operating leases with terms from one month to fifteen years.

Unconditional Purchase Commitments

     The Company has various unconditional purchase commitments, consisting primarily of long-term disposal agreements, that require the Company to dispose of a minimum number of tons at certain third-party facilities.

Liability Insurance

     The Company carries general liability, vehicle liability, employment practices liability, pollution liability, directors and officers liability, worker’s compensation and employer’s liability coverage, as well as umbrella liability policies to provide excess coverage over the underlying limits contained in these primary policies. The Company also carries property insurance.

     The Company’s insurance programs for worker’s compensation, general liability, vehicle liability and employee-related health care benefits are effectively self-insured. Claims in excess of self-insurance levels are fully insured subject to policy limits. Accruals are based on claims filed and estimates of claims incurred but not reported.

     The Company’s liabilities for unpaid and incurred but not reported claims at March 31, 2007 (which includes claims for worker’s compensation, general liability, vehicle liability and employee health care benefits) were $161.3 million under its current risk management program and are included in other current and other liabilities in the accompanying Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. While the ultimate amount of claims incurred is dependent on future developments, in management’s opinion, recorded reserves are adequate to cover the future payment of claims. However, it is possible that recorded reserves may not be adequate to cover the future payment of claims. Adjustments, if any, to estimates recorded

resulting from ultimate claim payments will be reflected in the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income in the periods in which such adjustments are known.

Guarantees of Subsidiary Debt

     The Company has guaranteed the tax-exempt bonds of its subsidiaries. If a subsidiary fails to meet its obligations associated with tax-exempt bonds as they come due, the Company will be required to perform under the related guarantee agreement. No additional liability has been recorded for these guarantees because the underlying obligations are reflected in the Company’s Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. (For further information, see Note 6, Debt.)

Restricted Cash and Other Financial Guarantees

     In the normal course of business, the Company is required by regulatory agencies, governmental entities and contract parties to post performance bonds, letters of credit and/or cash deposits as financial guarantees of the Company’s performance. A summary of letters of credit and surety bonds outstanding is as follows:

		March 31,				December 31,
		2007				2006
Letters of credit		$	643.5			$	638.4
Surety bonds			475.1				463.4

     As of March 31, 2007, $442.7 million of the above letters of credit were outstanding under the Company’s revolving credit facility. Also, as of March 31, 2007, surety bonds expire on various dates through 2014.

     The Company’s restricted cash deposits include restricted cash held for capital expenditures under certain debt facilities and other amounts held in trust as a financial guarantee of the Company’s performance as follows:

		March 31,				December 31,
		2007				2006
Restricted cash:
Financing proceeds		$	53.9			$	65.6
Other			88.1				87.7
		$	142.0			$	153.3

Other Matters

     The Company’s business activities are conducted in the context of a developing and changing statutory and regulatory framework. Governmental regulation of the waste management industry requires the Company to obtain and retain numerous governmental permits to conduct various aspects of its operations. These permits are subject to revocation, modification or denial. The costs and other capital expenditures which may be required to obtain or retain the applicable permits or comply with applicable regulations could be significant. Any revocation, modification or denial of permits could have a material adverse effect on the Company.

     During the first quarter of 2007, the Company received F&Os from the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency in response to environmental conditions at the Company’s Countywide facility. During the three months ended March 31, 2007, the Company recorded a pre-tax charge of $22.0 million related to estimated costs to comply with the F&Os. The estimated costs were based on current information and engineering analyses. The Company will adjust this charge, if necessary, to reflect the effects of new or additional information, to the extent that such information impacts the costs, timing or duration of the required actions. In addition, the Stark County Health Department, in connection with the annual issuance of Countywide’s operating license, is evaluating the environmental conditions that are the subject of the F&Os. The Company expects that the Health Department will make a decision regarding the renewal of Countywide’s operating license in May 2007.

     The Company is subject to various federal, state and local tax rules and regulations. The Company’s compliance with such rules and regulations is periodically audited by tax authorities. These authorities may challenge the positions taken in

the Company’s tax filings. As such, to provide for certain potential tax exposures, the Company maintains liabilities for uncertain tax positions for its estimate of the final outcome of the examinations. (For further information related to the Company’s liabilities for uncertain tax positions, see Note 7, Income Taxes.)

     The Internal Revenue Service is auditing the Company’s consolidated tax returns for fiscal years 2001 through 2004. Management believes that the liabilities for uncertain tax positions recorded are adequate. However, a significant assessment against the Company in excess of the liabilities recorded could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

     The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto included under Item 1. In addition, reference should be made to our audited Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto and related Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations appearing in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.

Overview of Our Business

     We are a leading provider of non-hazardous solid waste collection and disposal services in the United States. We provide solid waste collection services for commercial, industrial, municipal and residential customers through 136 collection companies in 21 states. We also own or operate 93 transfer stations, 58 solid waste landfills and 33 recycling facilities.

     We generate revenue primarily from our solid waste collection operations. Our remaining revenue is from other services including landfill disposal, recycling, compost, mulch and soil operations.

     The following table reflects our revenue by source for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 (in millions):

		Three Months Ended
		March 31,
		2007								2006 (a)
Collection:
Residential		$	195.8				25.6	%		$	183.5				24.9	%
Commercial			230.4				30.1				214.0				29.0
Industrial			155.7				20.3				157.6				21.4
Other			4.8				.6				6.1				.8
Total collection			586.7				76.6				561.2				76.1
Transfer and disposal			278.8								277.9
Less: Intercompany			(145.0	)							(140.5	)
Transfer and disposal, net			133.8				17.5				137.4				18.6
Other			45.1				5.9				38.9				5.3
Revenue		$	765.6				100.0	%		$	737.5				100.0	%

     Our revenue from collection operations consists of fees we receive from commercial, industrial, municipal and residential customers. Our residential and commercial collection operations in some markets are based on long-term contracts with municipalities. We generally provide industrial and commercial collection services to individual customers under contracts with terms up to three years. Our revenue from landfill operations is from disposal or tipping fees charged to third parties. In general, we integrate our recycling operations with our collection operations and obtain revenue from the sale of recyclable materials. No one customer has individually accounted for more than 10% of our consolidated revenue or of our reportable segment revenue in any of the periods presented.

     The cost of our collection operations is primarily variable and includes disposal, labor, self-insurance, fuel and equipment maintenance costs. It also includes capital costs for equipment and facilities. We seek operating efficiencies by controlling the movement of waste from the point of collection through disposal. During the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, approximately 57% of the total volume of waste we collected was disposed of at landfills we own or operate.

     Our landfill costs include daily operating expenses, costs of capital for cell development, costs for final capping, closure and post-closure, and the legal and administrative costs of ongoing environmental compliance. Daily operating expenses include leachate treatment and disposal, methane gas and groundwater monitoring and system maintenance, interim cap maintenance, and costs associated with the application of daily cover materials. We expense all indirect landfill development costs as they are incurred. We use life cycle accounting and the units-of-consumption method to recognize certain direct

landfill costs related to cell development. In life cycle accounting, certain direct costs are capitalized, and charged to expense based on the consumption of cubic yards of available airspace. These costs include all costs to acquire and construct a site including excavation, natural and synthetic liners, construction of leachate collection systems, installation of methane gas collection and monitoring systems, installation of groundwater monitoring wells, and other costs associated with the acquisition and development of the site. Obligations associated with final capping, closure and post-closure are capitalized and amortized on a units-of-consumption basis as airspace is consumed.

     Cost and airspace estimates are developed at least annually by engineers. These estimates are used by our operating and accounting personnel to adjust our rates used to expense capitalized costs. Changes in these estimates primarily relate to changes in costs, timing of payments, available airspace, inflation and applicable regulations. Changes in available airspace include changes in engineering estimates, changes in design and changes due to the addition of airspace lying in expansion areas that we believe have a probable likelihood of being permitted.

     Summarized financial information concerning our reportable segments for the respective three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 is shown in the following table:

										SFAS 143
						Depreciation,				Adjustments to
						Amortization,				Amortization
						Depletion and				Expense for				Depreciation,
						Accretion Before				Changes in				Amortization,				Operating
		Net				SFAS 143				Estimates and				Depletion and				Income				Operating
2007		Revenue				Adjustments				Assumptions				Accretion				(Loss)				Margin
Eastern Region		$	137.6			$	12.1			$	2.1			$	14.2			$	6.7				4.9	%
Central Region			149.4				21.3				—				21.3				23.4				15.7
Southern Region			203.7				17.9				—				17.9				43.7				21.5
Southwestern Region			85.3				8.3				—				8.3				15.5				18.2
Western Region			189.4				16.7				2.9				19.6				43.9				23.2
Corporate Entities			.2				1.8				—				1.8				(18.5	)			—
Total		$	765.6			$	78.1			$	5.0			$	83.1			$	114.7				15.0

						Depreciation,
						Amortization,				Operating
		Net				Depletion and				Income				Operating
2006		Revenue				Accretion				(Loss)				Margin
Eastern Region		$	135.6			$	10.8			$	25.3				18.7	%
Central Region			148.1				22.9				26.2				17.7
Southern Region			193.8				18.2				36.9				19.0
Southwestern Region			82.1				8.8				13.5				16.4
Western Region			178.3				14.8				39.1				21.9
Corporate Entities			(.4	)			1.4				(18.6	)			—
Total		$	737.5			$	76.9			$	122.4				16.6

     Our operations are managed and reviewed through five regions that we designate as our reportable segments. From 2006 to 2007, revenue increased in all of our regions due to the successful execution of our pricing strategy.

	•		Revenue in our Eastern Region increased during 2007 compared to 2006 due to price increases in all lines of business and an increase in the price of commodities. This increase in revenue was partially offset by lower volumes in the industrial collection line of business, primarily due to less temporary work and lower landfill volumes. These lower volumes resulted from less favorable weather conditions and a general slowdown in residential construction during 2007.
			Operating margins in the Eastern Region decreased because of a $21.3 million increase in operating expenses associated with environmental conditions at our Countywide facility. Excluding these expenses, operating margins increased from 18.7% in 2006 to 20.3% in 2007. This increase in operating margins is primarily due to higher revenue, lower disposal costs, and lower truck and equipment maintenance expense.

	•		Revenue in our Central Region increased during 2007 compared to 2006 due to price increases in all lines of business. This increase in revenue was partially offset by lower volumes in all lines of business. Lower volumes in the collection lines of business are primarily due to less favorable weather conditions during 2007. Lower landfill volumes are primarily due to our decision to limit our acceptance of certain waste streams.
			Operating margins in our Central Region decreased primarily due to increased third-party hauling costs associated with our company assuming responsibility for hauling waste from the city of Toronto to one of our landfills in Michigan. This hauling service is provided to the city at a rate that approximates our cost. Increases in risk insurance and landfill operating costs also lowered margins. These increases in costs were partially offset by lower disposal costs and lower truck and equipment maintenance costs.
	•		In our Southern Region, price increases in all lines of business and increases in commercial collection, residential collection and landfill volumes resulted in an increase in revenue during 2007 compared to 2006. This increase in revenue was partially offset by lower industrial collection volumes, primarily due to less temporary work. These lower volumes are primarily due to a general slowdown in residential construction in 2007, and hurricane-related work that was performed during 2006.
			Operating margins in our Southern Region increased primarily due to higher revenue, lower disposal costs due to drier weather, and lower truck and equipment maintenance costs. These improvements in operating margins were partially offset by higher insurance costs.
	•		Our Southwestern Region benefited from price increases in all lines of business and volume increases in all collection lines of business. The increase in revenue during 2007 compared to 2006 resulting from these increases was partially offset by a decrease in landfill volumes. This decrease in landfill volumes is due to unfavorable weather conditions and lower special waste volumes during 2007.
			The increase in operating margins in our Southwestern Region is primarily due to higher revenue and lower landfill depletion costs.
	•		In our Western Region, price increases in all lines of business, volume increases in all collection lines of business and an increase in commodity prices resulted in an increase in revenue during 2007 compared to 2006. This increase in revenue was partially offset by a decrease in landfill volumes resulting from a general slowdown in residential construction in 2007.
			Operating margins in our Western Region increased primarily due to higher revenue, lower disposal costs and lower landfill operating costs.

Business Combinations

     We make decisions to acquire or invest in businesses based on financial and strategic considerations. Businesses acquired are accounted for under the purchase method of accounting and are included in our Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements from the date of acquisition.

     We acquired various solid waste businesses during the three months ended March 31, 2006. The aggregate purchase price we paid in these transactions was $3.2 million in cash.

     See Note 4, Business Combinations, of the Notes to our Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of business combinations.

Consolidated Results of Operations

     Our net income was $53.9 million, or $.28 per diluted share, for the three months ended March 31, 2007, as compared to $64.6 million, or $.31 per diluted share, for the three months ended March 31, 2006.

     During the three months ended March 31, 2007, we recorded a charge of $22.0 million ($13.5 million net of tax), or approximately $.07 per diluted share, related to estimated costs to comply with Final Findings and Orders issued by the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency in response to environmental conditions at our Countywide Recycling and Disposal Facility in East Sparta, Ohio. We will adjust this charge, if necessary, to reflect the effects of new or additional information, to the extent that such information impacts the costs, timing or duration of the required actions. This charge affected our Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income as follows:

		Three Months Ended
		March 31, 2007
Expenses:
Cost of operations		$	18.0
Depreciation, amortization and depletion			2.1
Selling, general and administrative			1.2
Operating income			(21.3	)
Other income (expense), net			(.7	)
Income before income taxes		$	(22.0	)

     During the three months ended March 31, 2007, we recorded a charge of $4.2 million, or approximately $.02 per diluted share, in our provision for income taxes related to the resolution of various income tax matters.

     The following table summarizes our costs and expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 in millions of dollars and as a percentage of our revenue:

		Three Months Ended
		March 31,
		2007								2006
Revenue		$	765.6				100.0	%		$	737.5				100.0	%
Cost of operations			486.7				63.6				456.4				61.9
Depreciation, amortization and depletion of property and equipment			77.1				10.1				71.3				9.7
Amortization of intangible assets			1.9				.2				1.8				.2
Accretion			4.1				.5				3.8				.5
Selling, general and administrative expenses			81.1				10.6				81.8				11.1
Operating income		$	114.7				15.0	%		$	122.4				16.6	%

     Revenue. Revenue was $765.6 million and $737.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, an increase of 3.8%. The following table reflects the components of our revenue growth for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006:

		Three Months Ended
		March 31,
		2007				2006
Core price			4.4	%			3.1	%
Fuel surcharges			.1				1.3
Environmental fees			.4				.4
Recycling commodities			.9				(.5	)
Total price			5.8				4.3
Core volume (a)			(1.6	)			4.9
Non-core volume			(.1	)			.2
Total volume			(1.7	)			5.1
Total internal growth			4.1				9.4
Acquisitions, net of divestitures			(.2	)			(.6	)
Taxes (b)			(.1	)			.1
Total revenue growth			3.8	%			8.9	%