SYNOVUS FINANCIAL CORP.
Table of Contents

 
 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008
Commission File Number 1-10312
(SYNOVUS FINANCIAL CORP. LOGO) SYNOVUS FINANCIAL CORP.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
     
GEORGIA   58-1134883
(State or other jurisdiction of   (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
incorporation or organization)    
1111 Bay Avenue, Suite # 500
P.O. Box 120
Columbus, Georgia 31902

(Address of principal executive offices)
(706) 649-2311
(Registrants’ telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
             
Large accelerated filer þ   Accelerated filer o   Non-accelerated filer o   Smaller reporting company o
        (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)    
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12B-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s class of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
     
Class   July 31, 2008
     
Common Stock, $1.00 Par Value   330,148,536 shares
 
 

 


 

SYNOVUS FINANCIAL CORP.
INDEX
         
       
 
       
 
    3  
 
    4  
 
    5  
 
    6  
 
    7  
 
    24  
 
    52  
 
    53  
 
       
 
    54  
 
    56  
 
    58  
 
    59  
 
    60  
 
    61  
 
    62  
 
 EX-10.1 FORM OF CHANGE OF CONTROL AGREEMENT
 EX-10.2 AMENDED AND RESTATED SYNOVUS FINANCIAL DIRECTOR DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
 EX-10.3 SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
 EX-31.1 SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF CEO
 EX-31.2 SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF CFO
 EX-32 SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO

2


Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1 — FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SYNOVUS FINANCIAL CORP.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(unaudited)
                 
    June 30,     December 31,  
(In thousands, except share data)   2008     2007  
ASSETS
               
Cash and due from banks
  $ 674,834       682,583  
Interest earning deposits with banks
    17,337       10,950  
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements
    152,177       76,086  
Trading account assets
    20,204       17,803  
Mortgage loans held for sale, at fair value
    185,245       153,437  
Impaired loans held for sale
    6,365        
Investment securities available for sale
    3,814,384       3,666,974  
 
               
Loans, net of unearned income
    27,445,891       26,498,585  
Allowance for loan losses
    (417,813 )     (367,613 )
 
           
Loans, net
    27,028,078       26,130,972  
 
           
 
               
Premises and equipment, net
    581,352       547,437  
Goodwill
    492,138       519,138  
Other intangible assets, net
    24,860       28,007  
Other assets
    1,230,327       1,185,065  
 
           
Total assets
  $ 34,227,301       33,018,452  
 
           
 
               
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
               
Liabilities:
               
Deposits:
               
Non-interest bearing retail and commercial deposits
  $ 3,553,342       3,472,423  
Interest bearing retail and commercial deposits
    17,887,708       17,734,851  
 
           
Total retail and commercial deposits
    21,441,050       21,207,274  
Brokered deposits ($90,722 and $293,842 at fair value as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007)
    4,587,302       3,752,542  
 
           
Total deposits
    26,028,352       24,959,816  
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements
    2,287,910       2,319,412  
Long-term debt
    2,121,625       1,890,235  
Other liabilities
    336,731       407,399  
 
           
Total liabilities
    30,774,618       29,576,862  
 
           
Minority interest in consolidated subsidiaries
    24,092        
Shareholders’ equity:
               
Common stock — $1.00 par value. Authorized 600,000,000 shares; issued 335,825,867 in 2008 and 335,529,482 in 2007; outstanding 330,153,646 in 2008 and 329,867,944 in 2007
    335,826       335,529  
Additional paid-in capital
    1,110,635       1,101,209  
Treasury stock, at cost - 5,672,221 shares in 2008 and 5,661,538 shares in 2007
    (114,075 )     (113,944 )
Accumulated other comprehensive income
    30,190       31,439  
Retained earnings
    2,066,015       2,087,357  
 
           
Total shareholders’ equity
    3,428,591       3,441,590  
 
           
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
  $ 34,227,301       33,018,452  
 
           
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

3


Table of Contents

SYNOVUS FINANCIAL CORP.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(unaudited)
                                 
    Six Months Ended     Three Months Ended  
    June 30,     June 30,  
(In thousands, except per share data)   2008     2007     2008     2007  
Interest income:
                               
Loans, including fees
  $ 863,959       1,018,364       408,653       516,307  
Investment securities available for sale
    91,042       83,373       45,886       42,920  
Trading account assets
    1,022       1,877       388       970  
Mortgage loans held for sale
    3,997       4,959       2,301       2,522  
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements
    1,875       2,850       855       1,372  
Interest earning deposits with banks
    125       968       57       401  
 
                       
Total interest income
    962,020       1,112,391       458,140       564,492  
 
                       
Interest expense:
                               
Deposits
    342,726       460,334       155,546       234,268  
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements
    29,480       42,198       11,650       21,619  
Long-term debt
    37,744       38,435       17,523       20,130  
 
                       
Total interest expense
    409,950       540,967       184,719       276,017  
 
                       
Net interest income
    552,070       571,424       273,421       288,475  
Provision for losses on loans
    184,665       40,797       93,616       20,281  
 
                       
Net interest income after provision for losses on loans
    367,405       530,627       179,805       268,194  
 
                       
Non-interest income:
                               
Service charges on deposit accounts
    54,461       54,420       26,070       28,050  
Fiduciary and asset management fees
    25,519       25,129       12,898       12,657  
Brokerage and investment banking income
    17,693       15,259       9,206       7,809  
Mortgage banking income
    13,847       14,920       5,686       7,695  
Bankcard fees
    26,417       23,447       14,198       11,567  
Net gains on sales of available for sale investment securities
          705             258  
Other fee income
    21,266       19,838       10,081       10,411  
Proceeds from sale of MasterCard shares
    16,186             16,186        
Proceeds from redemption of Visa shares
    38,542                    
Other operating income
    33,744       30,116       13,373       17,883  
 
                       
Total non-interest income
    247,675       183,834       107,698       96,330  
 
                       
Non-interest expense:
                               
Salaries and other personnel expense
    232,614       229,749       110,483       115,822  
Net occupancy and equipment expense
    61,340       54,860       31,130       27,572  
FDIC insurance and other regulatory fees
    12,250       4,698       6,172       2,315  
Impaired loans held for sale and other real estate
    31,502       1,150       23,621       577  
Goodwill impairment
    27,000             27,000        
Professional fees
    16,697       10,245       11,756       4,743  
Visa litigation expense
    (17,430 )                  
Other operating expenses
    103,365       91,755       55,802       46,631  
 
                       
Total non-interest expense
    467,338       392,457       265,964       197,660  
 
                       
 
                               
Minority interest in consolidated subsidiaries
    1,697             138        
 
                               
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
    146,045       322,004       21,401       166,864  
Income tax expense
    52,952       115,789       9,302       61,055  
 
                       
Income from continuing operations
    93,093       206,215       12,099       105,809  
Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes and minority interest
          103,287             56,941  
 
                       
Net income
  $ 93,093       309,502       12,099       162,750  
 
                       
 
                               
Net income per share:
                               
Basic
                               
Income from continuing operations
  $ 0.28       0.63       0.04       0.32  
 
                       
Net income
    0.28       0.95       0.04       0.50  
 
                       
 
                               
Diluted
                               
Income from continuing operations
  $ 0.28       0.63       0.04       0.32  
 
                       
Net income
    0.28       0.94       0.04       0.49  
 
                       
 
                               
Weighted average shares outstanding:
                               
Basic
    329,071       326,051       329,173       326,410  
 
                       
Diluted
    331,568       329,920       331,418       330,263  
 
                       
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

4


Table of Contents

SYNOVUS FINANCIAL CORP.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(unaudited)
                                                         
                                    Accum              
                                    ulated              
                                    Other              
                                    Compre-              
                    Additional             hensive              
    Shares     Common     Paid-In     Treasury     Income     Retained        
(In thousands, except per share data)   Issued     Stock     Capital     Stock     (Loss)     Earnings     Total  
Balance at December 31, 2006
    331,214     $ 331,214       1,033,055       (113,944 )     (2,129 )     2,460,454       3,708,650  
Cumulative effect of adoption of FIN No. 48
                                            (230 )     (230 )
Net Income
                                            309,502       309,502  
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
                                                       
Net unrealized gain on cash flow hedges
                                    (2,917 )             (2,917 )
Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities available for sale, net of reclassification adjustment
                                    (18,047 )             (18,047 )
Gain on foreign currency translation
                                    2,164               2,164  
 
                                                   
Other comprehensive loss
                                    (18,800 )             (18,800 )
 
                                                   
Comprehensive income
                                                    290,702  
 
                                                     
Cash dividends declared — $0.41 per share
                                            (134,124 )     (134,124 )
Issuance of non-vested stock
    52       52       (52 )                              
Share-based compensation expense
                    11,126                               11,126  
Stock options exercised
    1,750       1,750       31,800                               33,550  
Share-based tax benefit
                    7,741                               7,741  
Ownership change at majority-owned subsidiary
                    5,793                               5,793  
Issuance of common stock for acquisition
    62       62       2,054                               2,116  
 
                                         
Balance at June 30, 2007
    333,078     $ 333,078       1,091,517       (113,944 )     (20,929 )     2,635,602       3,925,324  
 
                                         
 
                                                       
Balance at December 31, 2007
    335,529     $ 335,529       1,101,209       (113,944 )     31,439       2,087,357       3,441,590  
Cumulative effect of adoption of EITF Issue No. 06-4
                                            (2,248 )     (2,248 )
Cumulative effect of adoption of SFAS No. 159
                                            58       58  
Net Income
                                            93,093       93,093  
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
                                                       
Net unrealized gain on cash flow hedges
                                    475               475  
Change in unrealized losses on investment securities available for sale, net of reclassification adjustment
                                    (1,816 )             (1,816 )
Amortization of post-retirement unfunded health benefit, net of tax
                                    92               92  
 
                                                   
Other comprehensive loss
                                    (1,249 )             (1,249 )
 
                                                   
Comprehensive income
                                                    91,844  
 
                                                     
Cash dividends declared — $0.34 per share
                                            (112,245 )     (112,245 )
Treasury shares purchased
                            (131 )                     (131 )
Issuance of non-vested stock, net
    (10 )     (10 )     10                                
Share-based compensation expense
                    7,675                               7,675  
Stock options exercised
    307       307       1,342                               1,649  
Share-based tax benefit
                    399                               399  
 
                                         
Balance at June 30, 2008
    335,826     $ 335,826       1,110,635       (114,075 )     30,190       2,066,015       3,428,591  
 
                                         
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

5


Table of Contents

SYNOVUS FINANCIAL CORP.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(unaudited)
                 
    Six Months Ended  
    June 30,  
(In thousands)   2008     2007  
Operating activities:
               
Net income
  $ 93,093       309,502  
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
               
Provision for losses on loans
    184,665       40,797  
Depreciation, amortization and accretion, net
    27,715       89,405  
Goodwill impairment
    27,000        
Equity in income of equity method investments
    (1,412 )     (3,237 )
Deferred tax expense
    1,125       (15,343 )
Decrease (increase) in interest receivable
    59,348       (9,479 )
Decrease in interest payable
    (33,283 )     (1,278 )
Minority interest in subsidiaries’ net income
    1,697       24,465  
Increase in trading account assets
    (2,401 )     (55,360 )
Originations of mortgage loans held for sale
    (625,996 )     (808,759 )
Proceeds from sales of mortgage loans held for sale
    597,445       798,826  
Gain on sale of mortgage loans held for sale
    (5,831 )     (6,243 )
Loss on sale of impaired loans held for sale
    10,126        
Decrease (increase) in prepaid and other assets
    71,989       (45,109 )
Decrease in accrued salaries and benefits
    (20,676 )     (77,628 )
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities
    35,846       (20,980 )
Net gains on sales of available for sale investment securities
          (705 )
Increase in fair value of private equity investments
    (4,946 )     (4,245 )
Gain from transfer of mutual funds
          (6,885 )
Gain on sale of MasterCard shares
    (16,186 )      
Proceeds from redemption of Visa shares
    (38,542 )      
Decrease in liability for Visa litigation
    (17,430 )      
Share-based compensation
    7,732       15,143  
Excess tax benefit from share-based payment arrangements
    (357 )     (7,398 )
Impairment of developed software
          620  
Other, net
    (2,534 )     17,929  
 
           
Net cash provided by operating activities
    348,187       234,038  
 
           
 
               
Investing activities:
               
Net (increase) decrease in interest earning deposits with banks
    (6,387 )     14,232  
Net increase in federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements
    (76,091 )     (140,594 )
Proceeds from maturities and principal collections of investment securities available for sale
    669,286       376,654  
Proceeds from sales of investment securities available for sale
    3,309       21,501  
Purchases of investment securities available for sale
    (817,795 )     (642,529 )
Proceeds from sale of impaired loans held for sale
    20,613        
Net increase in loans
    (1,290,126 )     (934,359 )
Purchases of premises and equipment
    (63,012 )     (76,095 )
Proceeds from disposals of premises and equipment
    2,115       1,914  
Net proceeds from transfer of mutual funds
          7,958  
Proceeds from sale of MasterCard shares
    16,186        
Proceeds from redemption of Visa shares
    38,542        
Additions to other intangible assets
          (77 )
Contract acquisition costs
          (9,542 )
Additions to licensed computer software from vendors
          (8,866 )
Additions to internally developed computer software
          (7,458 )
 
           
Net cash used by investing activities
    (1,503,360 )     (1,397,261 )
 
           
 
               
Financing activities:
               
Net increase in demand and savings deposits
    230,526       549,601  
Net increase in certificates of deposit
    838,010       153,838  
Net (decrease) increase in federal funds purchased and other securities sold under repurchase agreements
    (31,502 )     213,378  
Principal repayments on long-term debt
    (38,041 )     (201,845 )
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt
    270,300       529,313  
Treasury shares purchased
    (131 )      
Excess tax benefit from share-based payment arrangements
    357       7,398  
Dividends paid to shareholders
    (123,744 )     (130,482 )
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
    1,649       33,550  
 
           
Net cash provided by financing activities
    1,147,424       1,154,751  
 
           
 
               
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalent balances held in foreign currencies
          841  
 
           
 
               
Decrease in cash and due from banks
    (7,749 )     (7,631 )
Cash and due from banks at beginning of period
    682,583       889,975  
 
           
Cash and due from banks at end of period
  $ 674,834       882,344  
 
           
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

6


Table of Contents

SYNOVUS FINANCIAL CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 1 — Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and therefore do not include all information and footnotes necessary for a fair presentation of financial position, results of operations, and cash flows in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. All adjustments consisting of normally recurring accruals that, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and results of operations for the periods covered by this report have been included. The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Synovus Financial Corp. (Synovus) consolidated financial statements and related notes appearing in the 2007 Annual Report previously filed on Form 10-K.
In preparing the consolidated financial statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the respective balance sheets, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses for the periods presented. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates. Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near-term relate to the determination of the allowance for loan losses, the valuation of impaired loans held for sale, the valuation of real estate acquired in connection with foreclosures or in satisfaction of loans and the fair value of intangible assets, including goodwill.
A substantial portion of Synovus’ loans are secured by real estate in five southeastern states (Georgia, Alabama, Florida, South Carolina, and Tennessee). Accordingly, the ultimate collectibility of a substantial portion of Synovus’ loan portfolio is susceptible to changes in market conditions in these areas. Management believes that the allowance for loan losses is adequate. While management uses available information to recognize losses on loans, future additions to the allowance may be necessary based on changes in economic conditions. In addition, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review Synovus’ allowance for loan losses. Such agencies may require Synovus to make changes to the allowance for loan losses based on their judgment about information available to them at the time of their examination.
Synovus conducted its annual assessment of goodwill for impairment during the three months ended June 30, 2008. Determining the fair value of Synovus’ reporting units requires management to make certain judgments and assumptions related to various items, including discount rates, future estimates of operating results, etc. Management believes that the estimates and assumptions used in the goodwill impairment analysis for its business units are reasonable; however, if actual results and market conditions differ from the assumptions or estimates used, the fair value of each reporting unit could be different in the future.
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the presentation adopted in 2008.

7


Table of Contents

Note 2 — Supplemental Cash Flow Information
For the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, Synovus paid income taxes (net of refunds received) of $56.4 million and $191.0 million, respectively. The amount for the six months ended June 30, 2008 is impacted by tax overpayment credits from 2007 that were applied towards the 2008 income tax liability. For the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, Synovus paid interest of $372.9 million and $530.3 million, respectively.
Non-cash investing activities consisted of loans of approximately $171.3 million and $23.0 million, which were foreclosed and transferred to other real estate during the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and impaired loans of approximately $42.3 million which were transferred to impaired loans held for sale during the six months ended June 30, 2008.
Note 3 — Comprehensive Income
Other comprehensive income (loss) consists of the change in net unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedges, the change in net unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities available for sale, gains (losses) on foreign currency translation, and the amortization of the post-retirement unfunded health benefit. Comprehensive income consists of net income plus other comprehensive income (loss).
Comprehensive income (loss) for the six and three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 is presented below:
                                 
    Six Months Ended     Three Months Ended  
    June 30,     June 30,  
(in thousands)   2008     2007     2008     2007  
Net income
  $ 93,093       309,502       12,099       162,750  
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
                               
Change in net unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedges
    475       (2,917 )     (11,825 )     (4,428 )
Change in net unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities available for sale, net of reclassification adjustment
    (1,816 )     (18,047 )     (50,107 )     (25,741 )
Gains on foreign currency translation
          2,164             2,251  
Amortization of postretirement unfunded health benefit, net of tax
    92             46        
 
                       
Other comprehensive loss
    (1,249 )     (18,800 )     (61,886 )     (27,918 )
 
                       
Comprehensive income (loss)
  $ 91,844       290,702       (49,787 )     134,832  
 
                       
Note 4 — Impaired Loans Held for Sale
Loans or pools of loans are transferred to the impaired loans held for sale portfolio when the intent to hold the loans has changed due to portfolio management or risk mitigation strategies and when there is a plan to sell the loans within a reasonable period of time. The value of the loans or pools of loans is primarily determined by analyzing the underlying collateral of the loan and the external market prices of similar assets. At the time of transfer, if the fair value is less than the cost, the difference attributable to declines in credit quality is recorded as a charge-off against the allowance for loan losses. Decreases in fair value subsequent to the transfer as well as losses from sale of these loans are recognized as a component of non-interest expense. During the three months ended March 31, 2008, Synovus transferred loans with a cost basis totaling

8


Table of Contents

$63.3 million to the impaired loans held for sale portfolio. At the time of the transfer, Synovus recognized a $21.0 million charge-off on these loans, which resulted in a new cost basis of $42.3 million at March 31, 2008. The $21.0 million charge-off was estimated based on the estimated sales price of the portfolio through bulk sales. During the three months ended June 30, 2008, Synovus recognized a loss of $4.7 million from the sale of impaired loans held for sale and recognized additional write-downs of $5.4 million on the loans remaining in the portfolio. The $5.4 million write-down was based upon the estimated sales proceeds from a pending liquidation sale.
Note 5 — Other Real Estate
Other real estate, consisting of properties obtained through foreclosure or in satisfaction of loans, is reported at the lower of cost or fair value, determined on the basis of current appraisals, comparable sales, and other estimates of value obtained principally from independent sources, adjusted for estimated selling costs. At the time of foreclosure, any excess of the loan balance over the fair value of the real estate held as collateral is treated as a charge against the allowance for loan losses. Gains or losses on sale and any subsequent adjustments to the value are recorded as a component of non-interest expense.
The carrying value of other real estate was $197.3 million and $101.5 million at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. During the six and three months ended June 30, 2008, approximately $169.8 million of loans and $1.5 million of impaired loans held for sale were foreclosed and transferred to other real estate. The increased in other real estate is the result of negative migration in credit quality, the declining value of real estate in certain parts of Florida and the excess supply of residential real estate in the Atlanta area. During the six and three months ended June 30, 2008, Synovus recognized other real estate costs of $21.4 million and $13.5 million, respectively. These costs primarily relate to losses from the liquidation of other real estate through bulk sales and auctions as well as further write-downs due to declines in fair value subsequent to the date of foreclosure and, to a lesser degree, carrying costs associated with other real estate.
Note 6 — Fair Value Accounting — Adoption of SFAS Nos. 157 and 159
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (SFAS No. 157). SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value under U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This statement does not introduce any new requirements mandating the use of fair value; rather, it unifies the meaning of fair value and adds additional fair value disclosures. The provisions of this statement are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Effective January 1, 2008, Synovus adopted SFAS No. 157 for financial assets and liabilities. As permitted under FASB Staff Position No. FAS 157-2, Synovus has elected to defer the application of SFAS No. 157 to non-financial assets and liabilities until January 1, 2009.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (SFAS No. 159). SFAS No.159 permits entities to make an irrevocable election, at specified election dates, to measure eligible financial instruments and certain other instruments at fair value. As of January 1, 2008, Synovus has elected the fair value option (FVO) for mortgage loans held for sale and certain callable brokered certificates of deposit. Accordingly, a cumulative adjustment of $58 thousand ($91 thousand less $33 thousand of income taxes) was recorded as an increase to retained earnings.

9


Table of Contents

The following is a description of the assets and liabilities for which fair value has been elected, including the specific reasons for electing fair value.
Mortgage Loans Held for Sale
Mortgage loans held for sale (MLHFS) have been previously accounted for on a lower of aggregate cost or fair value basis pursuant to SFAS No. 65, “Accounting for Certain Mortgage Banking Activities” (SFAS No. 65). For certain mortgage loan types, fair value hedge accounting was utilized by Synovus to hedge a given mortgage loan pool, and the underlying mortgage loan balances were adjusted for the change in fair value related to the hedged risk (fluctuation in market interest rates) in accordance with SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”, as amended and interpreted (SFAS No. 133). For those certain mortgage loan types, Synovus is still able to achieve an effective economic hedge by being able to mark-to-market the underlying mortgage loan balances through the income statement, but has eliminated the operational time and expense needed to manage a hedge accounting program under SFAS No. 133. Previously under SFAS No. 65, Synovus was exposed, from an accounting perspective, only to the downside risk of market volatilities; however by electing FVO, Synovus may now also recognize the associated gains on the mortgage loan portfolio as favorable changes in the market occur.
Certain Callable Brokered Certificates of Deposit
Synovus has elected FVO for certain callable brokered certificates of deposit (CDs) to ease the operational burdens required to maintain hedge accounting for such instruments under the constructs of SFAS No. 133. Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 159, Synovus was highly effective in hedging the risk related to changes in fair value, due to fluctuations in market interest rates, by engaging in various interest rate derivatives. However, SFAS No. 133 requires an extensive documentation process for each hedging relationship and an extensive process related to assessing the effectiveness and measuring ineffectiveness related to such hedges. By electing FVO on these previously hedged callable brokered CDs, Synovus is still able to achieve an effective economic hedge by being able to mark-to-market the underlying CDs through the income statement, but has eliminated the operational time and expense needed to manage a hedge accounting program under SFAS No. 133.
The following table summarizes the impact of adopting the fair value option for these financial instruments as of January 1, 2008. Amounts shown represent the carrying value of the affected instruments before and after the changes in accounting resulting from the adoption of SFAS No. 159.
                         
    Ending             Opening  
    Balance     Cumulative     Balance  
    Sheet     Effect     Sheet  
    December     Adjustment     January 1,  
(Dollars in thousands)   31, 2007     Gain, net     2008  
Mortgage loans held for sale
  $ 153,437     $ 91     $ 153,528  
Certain callable brokered CDs
    293,842             293,842  
 
                     
Pre-tax cumulative effect of adoption of the fair value option
            91          
Deferred tax liability
            (33 )        
 
                     
Cumulative effect of adoption of the fair value option (increase to retained earnings)
          $ 58          
 
                     

10


Table of Contents

Determination of Fair Value
SFAS No. 157 defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. SFAS No. 157 also establishes a fair value hierarchy for disclosure of fair value measurements based on significant inputs used to determine the fair value. The three levels of inputs are as follows:
     
Level 1
  Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 1 assets and liabilities include corporate debt and equity securities, certain derivative contracts, as well as certain U.S. Treasury and U.S. Government-sponsored enterprise debt securities that are highly liquid and are actively traded in over-the-counter markets.
 
   
Level 2
  Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. Level 2 assets and liabilities include debt securities with quoted prices that are traded less frequently than exchange-traded instruments and derivative contracts whose value is determined using a pricing model with inputs that are observable in the market or can be derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data. This category generally includes certain U.S. Government-sponsored enterprises and agency mortgage-backed debt securities, obligations of states and municipalities, certain callable brokered certificates of deposit, collateralized mortgage obligations, derivative contracts, and mortgage loans held-for-sale.
 
   
Level 3
  Unobservable inputs that are supported by little if any market activity for the asset or liability. Level 3 assets and liabilities include financial instruments whose value is determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, as well as instruments for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation. This category primarily includes Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve Bank stock, collateral-dependent impaired loans, and certain private equity investments.
Following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for the major categories of financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value.
Trading Account Assets/Liabilities and Investment Securities Available for Sale
Where quoted market prices are available in an active market, securities are valued at the last traded price by obtaining feeds from a number of live data sources including active market makers and inter-dealer brokers. These securities are classified as Level 1 within the valuation hierarchy and include U.S. Treasury securities, obligations of U.S. Government-sponsored enterprises, and corporate debt and equity securities. If quoted market prices are not available, fair values are estimated by using bid prices and quoted prices of pools or tranches of securities with similar characteristics. These types of securities are classified as Level 2 within the valuation hierarchy and consist of collateralized mortgage obligations, mortgage-backed debt securities, debt securities of U.S. Government-sponsored enterprises and agencies, and state and municipal bonds. In both cases, Synovus has evaluated the valuation methodologies of its third party valuation providers to determine whether such valuations are representative of an exit price in Synovus’ principal markets. In certain cases where there is limited activity or less transparency around inputs to valuation, securities are classified as Level 3 within the valuation hierarchy. These Level 3 items are primarily Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) and Federal Reserve Bank (FRB) stock.

11


Table of Contents

Mortgage Loans Held for Sale
Since quoted market prices are not available, fair value is derived from a hypothetical-securitization model used to project the “exit price” of the loan in securitization. The bid pricing convention is used for loan pricing for similar assets. The valuation model is based upon forward settlement of a pool of loans of identical coupon, maturity, product, and credit attributes. The inputs to the model are continuously updated with available market and historical data. As the loans are sold in the secondary market and predominantly used as collateral for securitizations, the valuation model represents the highest and best use of the loans in Synovus’ principal market. Mortgage loans held for sale are classified within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy.
Private Equity Investments
Private equity investments consist primarily of investments in venture capital funds. The valuation of these instruments requires significant management judgment due to the absence of quoted market prices, inherent lack of liquidity, and the long-term nature of such assets. Based on these factors, the ultimate realizable value of private equity investments could differ significantly from the values reflected in the accompanying financial statements. Private equity investments are valued initially based upon transaction price. Thereafter, Synovus uses information provided by the fund managers in the determination of estimated fair value. Valuation factors such as recent or proposed purchase or sale of debt or equity of the issuer, pricing by other dealers in similar securities, size of position held, liquidity of the market and changes in economic conditions affecting the issuer are used in the determination of estimated fair value. These private equity investments are classified as Level 3 within the valuation hierarchy.
Private equity investments may also include investments in publicly traded equity securities, which have restrictions on their sale, generally obtained through an initial public offering. Investments in the restricted publicly traded equity securities are recorded at fair value based on the quoted market value less adjustments for regulatory or contractual sales restrictions. Discounts for restrictions are determined based upon the length of the restriction period and the volatility of the equity security. Investments in restricted publicly traded equity securities are classified as Level 2 within the valuation hierarchy.
Derivative Assets and Liabilities
Equity derivatives are valued using quoted market prices and are classified as Level 1 within the valuation hierarchy. All other derivatives are valued using internally developed models. These derivatives include interest rate swaps, floors, caps, and collars. The sale of To-be-announced (TBA) mortgage-backed securities for current month delivery or in the future and the purchase of option contracts of similar duration are derivatives utilized by Synovus’ mortgage subsidiary, and are valued by obtaining prices directly from dealers in the form of quotes for identical securities or options using a bid pricing convention with a spread between bid and offer quotations. All of these types of derivatives are classified as Level 2 within the valuation hierarchy. The mortgage subsidiary originates mortgage loans which are classified as derivatives prior to the loan closing when there is a lock commitment outstanding to a borrower to close a loan at a specific interest rate. These derivatives are valued based on the other mortgage derivatives mentioned above except there is fall-out ratios for interest rate lock commitments that have an additional input

12


Table of Contents

which is considered Level 3. Therefore, this type of derivative instrument is classified as Level 3 within the valuation hierarchy. These amounts, however, are insignificant.
Certain Callable Brokered Certificates of Deposit
The fair value of certain callable brokered certificates of deposit is derived using several inputs in a valuation model that calculates the discounted cash flows based upon a yield curve. Once the yield curve is constructed, it is applied against the standard certificate of deposit terms that may include the principal balance, payment frequency, term to maturity, and interest accrual to arrive at the discounted cash flow based fair value. When valuing the call option, as applicable, implied volatility is obtained for a similarly dated interest rate swaption, and it is also entered in the model. These types of certificates of deposit are classified as Level 2 within the valuation hierarchy.
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The following table presents all financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis, including financial instruments for which Synovus has elected the fair value option as of June 30, 2008 according to the SFAS No. 157 valuation hierarchy:
                                 
                            Total
                            Assets/Liabilities at
(in thousands)   Level 1   Level 2   Level 3   Fair Value
Assets
                               
 
                               
Trading account assets
  $ 780       19,424           $ 20,204  
Mortgage loans held for sale
          185,245             185,245  
 
                               
Investment securities available for sale
    5,730       3,673,742       134,912 (2)     3,814,384  
Private equity investments
                65,049       65,049  
Derivative assets
    6,914       102,261             109,175  
 
                               
Liabilities
                               
 
                               
Brokered certificates of deposit (1)
  $       90,722           $ 90,722  
Trading account liabilities
          10,611             10,611  
Derivative liabilities
    6,914       59,208             66,122  
 
(1)   Amounts represent the value of the certain callable brokered certificates of deposit for which Synovus has elected the fair value option under SFAS No. 159.
 
(2)   This amount primarily consists of Federal Home Loan Bank stock and Federal Reserve Bank stock of approximately $117.9 million and $4.4 million, respectively.
Changes in Fair Value — FVO Items
The following table presents the changes in fair value included in the consolidated statement of income for items which the fair value election was made. The table does not reflect the change in fair value attributable to the related economic hedges Synovus used to mitigate interest rate risk associated with the financial instruments. These changes in fair value were recorded as a component of mortgage banking income and other operating income, as appropriate, and substantially offset the change in fair value of the financial instruments referenced below.

13


Table of Contents

                                                 
    Three Months Ended June 30, 2008   Six Months Ended June 30, 2008
                    Total                   Total
    Mortgage   Other   Changes in   Mortgage   Other   Changes in
    Banking   Operating   Fair Value   Banking   Operating   Fair Value
(in thousands)   Income   Income   Recorded   Income   Income   Recorded
Mortgage loans held for sale
  $ (2,370 )         $ (2,370 )   $ (2,320 )         $ (2,320 )
Certain callable brokered CDs
  $       988     $ (988 )   $       (1,262 )   $ 1,262  
Changes in Level Three Fair Value Measurements
As noted above, Synovus uses significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) to fair-value certain assets and liabilities as of June 30, 2008. The table below includes a roll forward of the balance sheet amount for the six months ended June 30, 2008 (including the change in fair value), for financial instruments of a material nature that are classified by Synovus within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy and are measured at fair value on a recurring basis.
                 
    Investment        
    Securities        
    Available     Private Equity  
(in thousands)   for Sale     Investments  
Beginning balance January 1, 2008
  $ 126,715       55,581  
Total gains or (losses) (realized/unrealized), net of minority interest:
               
Included in earnings
          3,577  
Included in other comprehensive income
    (126 )      
Purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements, net
    8,323       5,891  
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3
           
 
           
Ending balance June 30, 2008
  $ 134,912       65,049  
 
           
The amount of total gains or (losses) for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets and liabilities still held at June 30, 2008
  $ (126 )     3,577  
The table below summarizes gains and losses due to changes in fair value, including both realized and unrealized gains and losses, recorded in earnings or changes in net assets for material Level 3 assets and liabilities for the three months ended June 30, 2008.
                                 
    Three Months Ended June 30,   Six Months Ended June 30,
    2008   2008
    Investment           Investment    
    Securities           Securities    
    Available for   Private Equity   Available for   Private Equity
(in thousands)   Sale   Investments   Sale   Investments
Total change in earnings, net of minority interest
  $       (234 )   $       3,577  
 
                               
Change in unrealized losses to assets and liabilities still held at June 30, 2008
  $ (53 )         $ (126 )      

14


Table of Contents

Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Non-recurring Basis
Loans under the scope of SFAS No. 114, “Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan” (SFAS No. 114), are evaluated for impairment using the present value of the expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, or as a practical expedient, a loan’s observable market price, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. The measurement of impaired loans using future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate rather than the market rate of interest is not a fair value measurement and is therefore excluded from the requirements of SFAS No. 157. Impaired loans measured by applying the practical expedient in SFAS No. 114 are included in the requirements of SFAS No. 157.
Under the practical expedient, Synovus measures the fair value of collateral-dependent impaired loans based on the fair value of the collateral securing these loans. These measurements are classified as Level 3 within the valuation hierarchy. All impaired loans are secured by real estate. The fair value of this real estate is generally determined based upon appraisals performed by a certified or licensed appraiser using inputs such as absorption rates, capitalization rates, and comparables. Management also considers other factors or recent developments which could result in adjustments to the collateral value estimates indicated in the appraisals such as changes in absorption rates or market conditions from the time of valuation. Impaired loans are reviewed and evaluated on at least a quarterly basis for additional impairment and adjusted accordingly, based on the same factors identified above.
The fair value of collateral-dependent impaired loans (including impaired loans held for sale) totaled $485.7 million at June 30, 2008, compared to $433.6 million at March 31, 2008, and $264.9 million at December 31, 2007.
Note 7 — Derivative Instruments
Synovus accounts for its derivative financial instruments as either assets or liabilities on the balance sheet at fair value through adjustments to either the hedged items, accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), or current earnings, as appropriate. As part of its overall interest rate risk management activities, Synovus utilizes derivative instruments to manage its exposure to various types of interest rate risk. These derivative instruments consist of interest rate swaps, commitments to sell fixed-rate mortgage loans, and interest rate lock commitments made to prospective mortgage loan customers. Interest rate lock commitments represent derivative instruments since it is intended that such loans will be sold.
Synovus originates first lien residential mortgage loans for sale into the secondary market and generally does not hold the originated loans for investment purposes. Mortgage loans are sold by Synovus for conversion to securities and the servicing is sold to a third party servicing aggregator, or the mortgage loans are sold as a whole loan to an investor either individually or in bulk.
At June 30, 2008, Synovus had commitments to fund primarily fixed-rate mortgage loans to customers in the amount of $72.0 million. The fair value of these commitments at June 30, 2008 resulted in an unrealized gain of $1.1 million, which was recorded as a component of mortgage banking income in the consolidated statements of income.
At June 30, 2008, outstanding commitments to sell primarily fixed-rate mortgage loans amounted to approximately $231.0 million. Such commitments are entered into to reduce the exposure to market risk arising from potential changes in interest rates, which could affect the

15


Table of Contents

fair value of mortgage loans held for sale and outstanding commitments to originate residential mortgage loans for resale.
The commitments to sell mortgage loans are at fixed prices and are scheduled to settle at specified dates that generally do not exceed 90 days. The fair value of outstanding commitments to sell mortgage loans at June 30, 2008 resulted in an unrealized gain of $877 thousand, which was recorded as a component of mortgage banking income in the consolidated statements of income.
Synovus utilizes interest rate swaps to manage interest rate risks, primarily arising from its core banking activities. These interest rate swap transactions generally involve the exchange of fixed and floating rate interest rate payment obligations without the exchange of underlying principal amounts. Entering into interest rate derivatives potentially exposes Synovus to the risk of counterparties’ failure to fulfill their legal obligations including, but not limited to, potential amounts due or payable under each derivative contract. Notional principal amounts are often used to express the volume of these transactions, but the amounts potentially subject to credit risk are much smaller.
The receive fixed interest rate swap contracts at June 30, 2008 are being utilized to hedge $850 million in floating rate loans and $1.38 billion in fixed-rate liabilities. A summary of interest rate swap contracts and their terms at June 30, 2008 is shown below. In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 133, the fair value (net unrealized gains and losses) of these contracts has been recorded on the consolidated balance sheets.
                                                         
            Weighted-Average                     Net  
                            Maturity                     Unrealized  
  Notional     Receive     Pay     In     Unrealized     Gains  
(Dollars in thousands)   Amount     Rate     Rate(*)     Months     Gains     Losses     (Losses)  
Receive fixed interest swaps:
                                                       
Fair value hedges
  $ 1,377,500       4.08 %     2.64 %     29     $ 13,276       (1,414 )     11,862  
Cash flow hedges
    850,000       7.86 %     5.00 %     30       31,440       (1,242 )     30,198  
                                   
Total
  $ 2,227,500       5.52 %     3.54 %     30     $ 44,716       (2,656 )     42,060  
                                   
 
(*)   Variable pay rate based upon contract rates in effect at June 30, 2008.
Synovus designates hedges of floating rate loans as cash flow hedges. These swaps hedge against the variability of cash flows from specified pools of floating rate prime based loans. Synovus calculates effectiveness of the hedging relationship quarterly using regression analysis for all cash flow hedges entered into after March 31, 2007. The cumulative dollar offset method is used for all hedges entered into prior to that date. As of June 30, 2008, cumulative ineffectiveness for Synovus’ portfolio of cash flow hedges represented a gain of approximately $20 thousand. Ineffectiveness from cash flow hedges is recognized in the consolidated statements of income as a component of other operating income.
Synovus expects to reclassify from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) approximately $11.7 million as net-of-tax income during the next twelve months, as the related payments for interest rate swaps and amortization of deferred gains (losses) are recorded.
Synovus designates hedges of fixed rate liabilities as fair value hedges. These swaps hedge against the change in fair market value of various fixed rate liabilities due to changes in the benchmark interest rate LIBOR. Synovus calculates effectiveness of the hedging relationships

16


Table of Contents

quarterly using regression analysis for all fair value hedges entered into after March 31, 2007. As of June 30, 2008, cumulative ineffectiveness for Synovus’ portfolio of fair value hedges represented a gain of approximately $1.3 million. Ineffectiveness from fair value hedges is recognized in the consolidated statements of income as other operating income.
Synovus also enters into derivative financial instruments to meet the financing and interest rate risk management needs of its customers. Upon entering into these instruments to meet customer needs, Synovus enters into offsetting positions in order to minimize the risk to Synovus. These derivative financial instruments are recorded at fair value with any resulting gain or loss recorded in current period earnings. As of June 30, 2008, the notional amount of customer related interest rate derivative financial instruments, including both the customer position and the offsetting position, was $3.76 billion, an increase of $799.3 million compared to December 31, 2007.
Synovus also enters into derivative financial instruments to meet the equity risk management needs of its customers. Upon entering into these instruments to meet customer needs, Synovus enters into offsetting positions in order to minimize the risk to Synovus. These derivative financial instruments are recorded at fair value with any resulting gain or loss recorded in current period earnings. As of June 30, 2008, the notional amount of customer related equity derivative financial instruments, including both the customer position and the offsetting position, was $10.7 million, unchanged from December 31, 2007.
Note 8 — Share-Based Compensation
General Description of Share-Based Compensation Plans
Synovus has various long-term incentive plans under which the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors has the authority to grant share-based compensation to Synovus employees. At June 30, 2008, Synovus had a total of 19,872,818 shares of its authorized but unissued common stock reserved for future grants under the 2007 Omnibus Plan. The general terms of each of these plans are substantially the same, permitting the grant of share-based compensation including stock options, non-vested shares, restricted share units, and stock appreciation rights. These plans generally include vesting periods ranging from three to five years and contractual terms ranging from five to ten years. Stock options are granted at exercise prices which equal the fair market value of a share of common stock on the grant date. Synovus historically issues new shares to satisfy share option exercises.
Share-Based Compensation Expense
Synovus’ share-based compensation costs are recorded as a component of salaries and other personnel expense in the consolidated statements of income. Share-based compensation expense is recognized for plan participants on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the vesting period or the period until reaching retirement eligibility. Share-based compensation expense from continuing operations recognized in income is presented below:
                                 
    Six Months Ended     Three Months Ended  
    June 30,     June 30,  
(In thousands)   2008     2007     2008     2007  
Share-based compensation expense:
                               
Stock options
  $ 2,360       5,084       1,223       2,559  
Non-vested shares
    5,399       3,463       2,883       1,697  
 
                       
Total share-based compensation expense
  $ 7,759       8,547       4,106       4,256  
 
                       

17


Table of Contents

Stock Option Awards
Synovus granted 3,090,911 and 48,000 options to purchase shares of Synovus common stock to certain key Synovus employees during the six and three months ended June 30, 2008, at a weighted-average exercise price of $13.17 and $12.50, respectively. At June 30, 2008, there were 31,601,244 options to purchase shares of Synovus common stock outstanding with a weighted-average exercise price of $10.87.
Non-Vested Shares and Restricted Share Units
During the six and three months ended June 30, 2008, Synovus awarded 122,309 and 27,600, respectively, restricted share units and 24,391 and 6,134, respectively, non-vested shares of non-transferable Synovus common stock to certain key employees and non-employee directors of Synovus. The weighted-average grant date fair value of both the awarded stock and the stock units for the six months ended June 30, 2008 was $12.93.
All holders of non-vested shares of Synovus common stock on December 31, 2007 received Total System Services, Inc. (TSYS) non-vested shares based on the distribution ratio applicable to all Synovus shares in connection with the spin-off of TSYS. At June 30, 2008, there were 1,028,223 non-vested Synovus shares and restricted share units outstanding and 426,087 non-vested shares of TSYS stock outstanding with a combined weighted-average grant date fair value of $25.67.
In addition, 12,677 non-transferable non-vested shares of Synovus common stock and 6,135 non-vested shares of TSYS common stock were awarded to a key Synovus executive from a 2005 authorized grant of 63,386 shares under a performance vesting schedule during the six-month period ended June 30, 2008, with a grant date fair value of $23.42.
Note 9 — Discontinued Operations
TSYS Spin-off
On December 31, 2007, Synovus completed the tax-free spin-off of its shares of TSYS common stock to Synovus shareholders. The distribution of approximately 80.6% of TSYS’ outstanding shares owned by Synovus was made to shareholders of record on December 18, 2007 (the “record date”). Each Synovus shareholder received 0.483921 of a share of TSYS common stock for each share of Synovus common stock held as of the record date. Synovus shareholders received cash in lieu of fractional shares for amounts of less than one share of TSYS common stock. Pursuant to the agreement and plan of distribution, TSYS paid on a pro rata basis to its shareholders, including Synovus, a one-time cash dividend of $600 million or $3.0309 per TSYS share based on the number of TSYS shares outstanding as of the record date. Based on the number of TSYS shares owned by Synovus as of the record date, Synovus received $483.8 million in proceeds from this one-time cash dividend. The dividend was paid on December 31, 2007.
In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” and SFAS No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities,” the historical consolidated results of operations of TSYS, as well as all costs associated with the spin-off of TSYS are now presented as a component of income from discontinued operations. The balance sheet for the periods ended June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 does not include assets and liabilities of TSYS.

18


Table of Contents

Transfer of Mutual Funds
During the three months ended June 30, 2007, Synovus transferred its proprietary mutual funds (Synovus Funds) to a non-affiliated third party. As a result of the transfer, Synovus received gross proceeds of $7.96 million and incurred transaction related costs of $1.07 million, resulting in a pre-tax gain of $6.89 million or $4.20 million, after-tax. The net gain has been reported as discontinued operations on the accompanying consolidated statements of income. Financial results of the business associated with the Synovus Funds for 2007 have not been presented as discontinued operations as such amounts are inconsequential. This business did not have significant assets, liabilities, revenues, or expenses associated with it.
The following amounts have been segregated from continuing operations and included in income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes and minority interest, in the consolidated statements of income:
                 
    Six Months     Three Months  
    Ended     Ended  
(In thousands)   June 30, 2007     June 30, 2007  
TSYS
               
TSYS revenues
  $ 903,155     $ 466,546  
 
               
TSYS income, net of minority interest and before taxes
    169,946       88,707  
Income tax expense
    (70,496 )     (35,603 )
 
           
Income from discontinued operations related to TSYS, net of income taxes
    99,450       53,104  
Spin-off related expenses incurred by Synovus, net of income tax benefit
    (363 )     (363 )
Gain on sale of mutual funds, net of income taxes
    4,200       4,200  
 
           
Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes and minority interest
  $ 103,287     $ 56,941  
 
           
Cash flows of discontinued operations for the six months ended June 30, 2007 are presented below.
         
    Six Months  
    Ended  
(In thousands)   June 30, 2007  
Cash provided by operating activities
  $ 119,506  
Cash used in investing activities
    (43,720 )
Cash used in financing activities
    (13,556 )
Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents
    841  
 
     
Cash provided by discontinued operations
  $ 63,071  
 
     
Note 10 — Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Under SFAS No. 142 (SFAS No. 142), “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” goodwill is required to be tested for impairment annually, or more frequently if events or circumstances indicate that there may be impairment. The combination of the income approach utilizing the

19


Table of Contents

discounted cash flow (DCF) method, the public company comparables approach, utilizing multiples of tangible book value, and the transaction approach, utilizing readily available market valuation multiples for closed transactions, is used to estimate the fair value of the reporting unit.
Impairment is tested at the reporting unit (sub-segment) level involving two steps. Step 1 compares the fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying value. If the fair value is greater than carrying value, there is no indication of impairment. Step 2 is performed when the fair value determined in Step 1 is less than the carrying value. Step 2 involves a process similar to business combination accounting where fair values are assigned to all assets, liabilities, and intangibles. The result of Step 2 is the implied fair value of goodwill. If the Step 2 implied value of goodwill is less than the recorded goodwill, an impairment charge is recorded for the difference. The total of all reporting unit fair values is compared for reasonableness to Synovus’ market capitalization plus a control premium.
Goodwill at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 was $492.1 million and $519.1 million, respectively. During the three months ended June 30, 2008, Synovus conducted its annual goodwill impairment evaluation. As a result of this evaluation, Synovus recognized a goodwill impairment charge of $27.0 million (pre-tax and after-tax) on one of its reporting units. The charge has been recorded as a component of non-interest expense. The goodwill impairment charge was primarily related to a decrease in valuation based on market trading and transaction multiples.
The goodwill impairment charge is preliminary and is subject to the finalization of the Step 2 calculation; however, based on preliminary Step 2 results, Synovus does not expect a significant change in the impairment charge.
Intangible assets (excluding goodwill) net of accumulated amortization as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively, are presented in the table below.
                 
    June 30,     December 31,  
(In thousands)   2008     2007  
Other intangible assets:
               
Purchased trust revenues
  $ 2,222       2,362  
Acquired customer contracts
    2,098       2,407  
Core deposit premiums
    19,998       22,668  
Other
    542       570  
 
           
Total carrying value
  $ 24,860       28,007  
 
           
Note 11 — Income Taxes
Synovus files income tax returns in the U.S. Federal jurisdiction and various state jurisdictions, and is subject to examinations by these taxing authorities unless statutory examination periods lapse. Synovus’ U.S. Federal income tax return is filed on a consolidated basis. Most state income tax returns are filed on a separate entity basis. Synovus is no longer subject to U.S. Federal income tax examinations for years before 2004 and Synovus is no longer subject to income tax examinations from state and local tax authorities for years before 2001. There is currently no Federal tax examination in progress. However, certain state tax examinations are in progress by the relevant state tax authorities. Although Synovus is unable to determine the ultimate outcome of these examinations, Synovus believes that its liability for uncertain tax positions relating to these jurisdictions for such years is adequate.
In connection with the spin-off of TSYS, Synovus entered into a tax sharing agreement with TSYS, which requires TSYS to indemnify Synovus from potential income tax liabilities that may

20


Table of Contents

arise in future examinations as a result of TSYS’ inclusion in Synovus’ consolidated tax return filings for calendar years prior to 2008.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows (1):
                 
    Six Months     Three Months  
    Ended     Ended  
(in thousands)   June 30, 2008     June 30, 2008  
Beginning balance
  $ 7,074     $ 8,207  
Current activity:
               
Additions based on tax positions related to current year
    493       322  
Additions for tax positions of prior years
    1,299        
Reductions for tax positions of prior years
    (337 )      
Settlements
           
 
           
Net, current activity
    1,455       322  
 
           
Ending balance
  $ 8,529     $ 8,529  
 
           
 
(1)   Unrecognized state tax benefits are not adjusted for the Federal tax impact.
Synovus recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized income tax benefits as a component of income tax expense. Accrued interest and penalties on unrecognized tax benefits totaled $1.1 million and $1.2 million as of December 31, 2007 and June 30, 2008, respectively. The total amount of unrecognized income tax benefits as of December 31, 2007 and June 30, 2008 that, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate is $5.4 million and $6.4 million (net of the Federal benefit on state tax issues), respectively, which includes interest and penalties of $745 thousand and $780 thousand.
Synovus is not able to reasonably estimate the amount by which the liability will increase or decrease over time; however, at this time, Synovus does not expect a significant payment related to these obligations within the next year. Synovus expects that approximately $450 thousand of uncertain tax positions will be either settled or resolved during the next twelve months.
Note 12 — Visa Initial Public Offering and Litigation Expense
Synovus is a member of the Visa USA network. Under Visa USA bylaws, Visa members are obligated to indemnify Visa USA and/or its parent company, Visa, Inc., for potential future settlement of, or judgments resulting from, certain litigation, which Visa refers to as the “covered litigation.” Synovus’ indemnification obligation is limited to its membership proportion of Visa USA. On November 7, 2007, Visa announced the settlement of its American Express litigation, and disclosed in its annual report to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2007 that Visa had accrued a contingent liability for the estimated settlement of its Discover litigation. During the second half of 2007, Synovus recognized a contingent liability in the amount of $36.8 million as an estimate for its membership proportion of the American Express settlement and the potential Discover settlement, as well as its membership proportion of the amount that Synovus estimates will be required for Visa to settle the remaining covered litigation.
Visa, Inc. completed an initial public offering (the Visa IPO) in March 2008. Visa used a portion of the proceeds from the IPO to establish a $3.0 billion escrow for settlement of covered

21


Table of Contents

litigation and used substantially all of the remaining portion to redeem class B and class C shares held by Visa issuing members. During the three months ended March 31, 2008, Synovus recognized a pre-tax gain of $38.5 million on redemption proceeds received from Visa, Inc. and reduced the $36.8 million litigation accrual recognized in the second half of 2007 by $17.4 million for its pro-rata share of the $3.0 billion escrow funded by Visa, Inc. The redemption of shares and reduction of the accrued liability following the Visa IPO resulted in a gain of $34.1 million, net of tax, or $0.10 per diluted share, for the six months ended June 30, 2008.
Note 13 — Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the FASB’s Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) reached a consensus on EITF Issue No. 06-4, “Accounting for Deferred Compensation and Postretirement Benefit Aspects of Endorsement Split-Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements” (EITF 06-4). EITF 06-4 requires an employer to recognize a liability for future benefits based on the substantive agreement with the employee. EITF 06-4 requires a company to use the guidance prescribed in SFAS No. 106, “Employers’ Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions” and Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 12, “Omnibus Opinion,” when entering into an endorsement split-dollar life insurance agreement and recognizing the liability. EITF 06-4 was effective for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2007. Synovus adopted the provisions of EITF 06-4 effective January 1, 2008 and recognized approximately $2.4 million as a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings.
In November 2006, the EITF reached a consensus on EITF Issue No. 06-10, “Accounting for Deferred Compensation and Postretirement Benefit Aspects of Collateral Assignment Split-Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements” (EITF 06-10). Under EITF 06-10, an employer should recognize a liability for the postretirement benefit related to a collateral assignment split-dollar life insurance arrangement. The recognition of an asset should be based on the nature and substance of the collateral, as well as the terms of the arrangement such as (1) future cash flows to which the employer is entitled and (2) employee’s obligation (and ability) to repay the employer. EITF 06-10 was effective for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2007. Synovus adopted the provisions of EITF 06-10 effective January 1, 2008. There was no impact to Synovus upon adoption of EITF 06-10.
In November 2006, the EITF reached a consensus on EITF Issue No. 06-11, “Accounting for Income Tax Benefits of Dividends on Share-Based Payment Awards” (EITF 06-11). Employees may receive dividend payments (or the equivalent of) on vested and non-vested share-based payment awards. Under EITF 06-11, the Task Force concluded that a realized income tax benefit from dividends (or dividend equivalents) that are charged to retained earnings and are paid to employees for equity classified nonvested equity shares, nonvested equity share units, and outstanding equity share options should be recognized as an increase in additional paid-in capital. Once the award is settled, the Company should determine whether the cumulative tax deduction exceeded the cumulative compensation cost recognized on the income statement. If the total tax benefit exceeds the tax effect of the cumulative compensation cost, the excess would be an increase to additional paid-in capital. EITF 06-11 was effective for fiscal periods beginning after September 15, 2007. The impact of adoption of EITF 06-11 was not material to Synovus’ financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In November 2007, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 109, “Written Loan Commitments Recorded at Fair Value Through Earnings,” (SAB 109). SAB 109 supercedes SAB 105, “Application of Accounting Principles to Loan Commitments.” SAB 109, consistent with SFAS No. 156, “Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets,” and SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities,” requires that the expected net

22


Table of Contents

future cash flows related to the associated servicing of the loan should be included in the measurement of all written loan commitments that are accounted for at fair value through earnings. A separate and distinct servicing asset or liability is not recognized for accounting purposes until the servicing rights have been contractually separated from the underlying loan by sale or securitization of the loan with servicing retained. The provisions of this bulletin were effective for derivative loan commitments issued or modified in fiscal quarters beginning after December 15, 2007. The impact of adoption of SAB 109 was an increase in mortgage revenues of approximately $1.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008.
In December 2007, the SEC issued SAB No. 110, “Share-Based Payment,” (SAB 110) SAB 110 allows eligible public companies to continue to use a simplified method for estimating the expected term of stock options if their own historical exercise data no longer provides a reasonable basis. Under SAB No. 107, “Share-Based Payment,” the simplified method was scheduled to expire for all grants made after December 31, 2007. The provisions of this bulletin were effective on January 1, 2008. Due to the spin-off of TSYS on December 31, 2007 and recent changes to the terms of stock option agreements, Synovus elected to continue using the simplified method for determining the expected term component for all share options granted during 2008.

23


Table of Contents

ITEM 2 — MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION
AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements made or incorporated by reference in this document which are not statements of historical fact, including those under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and elsewhere in this document, constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of, and subject to the protections of, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (Securities Act), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act). Forward-looking statements include statements with respect to Synovus’ beliefs, plans, objectives, goals, targets, expectations, anticipations, assumptions, estimates, intentions and future performance and involve known and unknown risks, many of which are beyond Synovus’ control and which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of Synovus or the commercial banking industry or economy generally, to be materially different from future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.
All statements other than statements of historical fact are forward-looking statements. You can identify these forward-looking statements through Synovus’ use of words such as “believes,” “anticipates,” “expects,” “may,” “will,” “assumes,” “should,” “predicts,” “could,” “should,” “would,” “intends,” “targets,” “estimates,” “projects,” “plans,” “potential” and other similar words and expressions of the future or otherwise regarding the outlook for Synovus’ future business and financial performance and/or the performance of the commercial banking industry and economy generally. Forward-looking statements are based on the current beliefs and expectations of Synovus’ management and are subject to significant risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from those contemplated by such forward-looking statements. A number of factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements in this document. Many of these factors are beyond Synovus’ ability to control or predict. These factors include, but are not limited to: (1) competitive pressures arising from aggressive competition from other financial service providers; (2) deteriorating credit quality, particularly in residential construction and development loans, may result in increased delinquencies and credit losses, which will adversely impact us; (3) declining values of residential and commercial real estate may increase our credit losses and negatively affect our financial results; (4) the concentration of our nonperforming assets in certain geographic regions and with affiliated borrower groups; (5) inadequacy of our allowance for loan loss reserve, or the risk that the allowance may prove to be inadequate or may be negatively affected by credit risk exposures; (6) changes in the interest rate environment which expand or reduce interest margins, impact funding sources or adversely affect critical estimates, as applied, and fair value of assets; (7) slower than anticipated rates of growth in non-interest income; (8) changes in the cost and availability of funding due to changes in the deposit market and credit market, or the way in which Synovus is perceived in such markets, including a reduction in our debt ratings; (9) inability to access the capital markets on terms that are satisfactory; (10) the strength of the U.S. economy in general and the strength of the local economies in which operations are conducted may be different than expected; (11) the effects of and changes in trade, monetary and fiscal policies, and laws, including interest rate policies of the Federal Reserve Board; (12) inflation, interest rate, market and monetary fluctuations; (13) restrictions or limitations on access to funds from subsidiaries, thereby restricting our ability to make payments on our obligations or dividend payments; (14) the effect of changes in governmental policy, laws and regulations, including proposed and recently enacted changes in

24


Table of Contents

the regulation of banks and financial institutions, or the interpretation or application thereof, including restrictions, limitations and/or penalties arising from banking, securities and insurance laws, regulations and examinations; (15) the costs and effects of litigation, investigations or similar matters, or adverse facts and developments related thereto, including, without limitation, the pending litigation with CompuCredit Corporation relating to CB&T’s Affinity Agreement with CompuCredit; (16) Synovus’ indemnification obligation in connection with the Visa covered litigation may be greater than expected; (17) the volatility of our stock price; and (18) other factors and other information contained in this document and in other reports and filings that Synovus makes with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Exchange Act.
All written or oral forward-looking statements that are made by or are attributable to Synovus are expressly qualified by this cautionary notice. You should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, since those statements speak only as of the date on which the statements are made. Synovus undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which the statement is made to reflect the occurrence of new information or unanticipated events, except as may otherwise be required by law.

25


Table of Contents

Executive Summary
The following financial review provides a discussion of Synovus’ financial condition, changes in financial condition, and results of operations.
Industry Overview
The first half of 2008 has been marked by challenging financial and credit markets, building on issues that began in the sub-prime mortgage market in the second half of 2007 and which led to declines in real estate and home values. Consumer confidence declined as rising costs fueled by unprecedented prices for crude oil have paralleled the downturns in housing and mortgage related financial services. The supply of housing has surged as new and existing home sales declined sharply and foreclosures reached record levels.
The Federal Reserve Bank (Federal Reserve) responded, lowering the federal funds rate by 200 basis points in the first quarter and another 25 basis points in the second quarter. Despite these rate cuts and other measures taken by the Federal Reserve to provide additional liquidity in financial markets, consumer confidence has remained weak.
The economic environment for the financial services industry as a whole has been affected in a variety of ways, as evidenced by heightened levels of credit losses, declining value of real property as collateral for loans, record levels of non-performing assets, charge-offs and foreclosures. While these factors have negatively influenced earning asset yields, the average cost of funds has risen in an intensely competitive market for deposits. As a result, financial institutions have experienced pressure on credit costs, loan yields, deposit and other borrowing costs, and capital.
About Our Business
Synovus is a financial services holding company, based in Columbus, Georgia, with approximately $34 billion in assets. Synovus provides integrated financial services including banking, financial management, insurance, mortgage, and leasing services through 35 wholly-owned subsidiary banks and other Synovus offices in Georgia, Alabama, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Florida. At June 30, 2008, our banks ranged in size from $113.1 million to $5.76 billion in total assets.
Our Key Financial Performance Indicators
In terms of how we measure success in our business, the following are our key financial performance indicators:
             
 
  Loan Growth   Credit Quality   Capital Strength
 
  Core Deposit Growth   Fee Income Growth    
 
  Net Interest Margin   Expense Management    
Financial Performance Summary
    Net income: $12.1 million, down 88.6%, and $93.1 million, down 54.9%, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively, as compared to income from continuing operations for the prior year periods.

26


Table of Contents

    Goodwill impairment: $27.0 million, or $0.08 per diluted share, for the six and three months ended June 30, 2008. Goodwill impairment is a non-cash charge and has no impact on Synovus’ tangible capital levels, regulatory capital ratios or on liquidity since goodwill is already excluded from these measures.
 
    Diluted earnings per share (EPS): $0.04 for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and $0.28 for the six months ended June 30, 2008, down 88.6% and 55.1%, respectively, from EPS from continuing operations for the same periods a year ago (EPS of $0.12 for the three months ended June 30, 2008, excluding the goodwill impairment charge of $27.0 million).
 
    Net interest margin: 3.57% and 3.64% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively, as compared to 4.00% and 4.03%, respectively, for the same periods in 2007 (on a sequential quarter basis, 3 basis points of the 14 basis point decrease in the margin are related to increased credit costs).
 
    Loan growth: 7.5% increase from June 30, 2007, 7.2% annualized increase from December 31, 2007, and 4.9% annualized sequential quarter growth.
 
    Credit quality:
    Non-performing assets ratio of 3.00%, compared to 2.49% at March 31, 2008 and 1.67% at December 31, 2007 (29 basis points of the sequential quarter increase was from the Atlanta market).
 
    Provision expense of $93.6 million and $184.7 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively, as compared to $20.3 million and $40.8 million for the same periods in 2007.
 
    Past dues over 90 days and still accruing interest as a percentage of total loans of 0.14%, compared to 0.16% at March 31, 2008 and 0.13% at December 31, 2007.
 
    Total past dues over 30 days and still accruing interest as a percentage of total loans of 1.33% compared to 1.39% at March 31, 2008 and 1.02% at December 31, 2007.
 
    Net charge-off ratio of 1.04% and 0.99% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively, compared to 0.25% and 0.19% for the same periods in the prior year.
 
    Core deposits (total deposits less brokered deposits): 0.7% decline compared to June 30, 2007, and 4.1% annualized sequential quarter growth.
    Non-interest income: up 11.8% for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 34.7% for the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the corresponding periods in the prior year (up 13.8% for the six months ended June 30, 2008 excluding the gain from redemption of Visa shares).
 
    Non-interest expense: up 34.6% for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 19.1% for the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the corresponding periods in the prior year (up 20.9% and 16.6% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively, excluding the reduction in the Visa litigation accrual and goodwill impairment charge).

27


Table of Contents

    Shareholder’s equity: $3.43 billion at June 30, 2008, or 10.02% of assets. The Tier I Capital Ratio was 8.91%, the Total Risk-Based Capital Ratio was 12.28%, and the Tangible Common Equity to Tangible Assets Ratio was 8.64%.
 
    Visa, Inc. completed an initial public offering (the Visa IPO) in March 2008. Visa used a portion of the proceeds from the Visa IPO to establish a $3.0 billion escrow for settlement of covered litigation and used substantially all of the remaining portion to redeem class B and class C shares held by Visa issuing members. During the three months ended March 31, 2008, Synovus recognized a pre-tax gain of $38.5 million on redemption proceeds received from Visa, Inc. and reduced the $36.8 million litigation accrual recognized in the second half of 2007 by $17.4 million for its pro-rata share of the $3.0 billion escrow funded by Visa. Inc. The redemption proceeds and reduction of the Visa litigation accrual resulted in a gain of $34.1 million, net of tax, or $0.10 per diluted share. Synovus currently holds 1.4 million Visa class B shares which are subject to certain restrictions on sale and have a carrying value of zero.
Critical Accounting Policies
The accounting and financial reporting policies of Synovus conform to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and to general practices within the banking industry. Synovus has identified certain of its accounting policies as “critical accounting policies.” In determining which accounting policies are critical in nature, Synovus has identified the policies that require significant judgment or involve complex estimates. The application of these policies has a significant impact on Synovus’ financial statements. Synovus’ financial results could differ significantly if different judgments or estimates are applied in the application of these policies.
Allowance for Loan Losses
Notes 1 and 6 to the consolidated financial statements in Synovus’ 2007 annual report contain a discussion of the allowance for loan losses. The allowance for loan losses at June 30, 2008 was $417.8 million.
The allowance for loan losses is determined based on an analysis which assesses the probable loss within the loan portfolio. The allowance for loan losses consists of two components: the allocated and unallocated allowances. Both components of the allowance are available to cover inherent losses in the portfolio. Significant judgments or estimates made in the determination of the allowance for loan losses consist of the risk ratings for loans in the commercial loan portfolio, the valuation of the collateral for loans that are classified as collateral-dependent impaired loans, and the loss factors.
Commercial Loans — Risk Ratings and Expected Loss Factors
Commercial loans are assigned a risk rating on a nine point scale. For commercial loans that are not considered impaired, the allocated allowance for loan losses is determined based upon the expected loss percentage factors that correspond to each risk rating.
The risk ratings are based on the borrowers’ credit risk profile, considering factors such as debt service history and capacity, inherent risk in the credit (e.g., based on industry type and source of

28


Table of Contents

repayment), and collateral position. Ratings 6 through 9 are modeled after the bank regulatory classifications of special mention, substandard, doubtful, and loss. Expected loss percentage factors are based on the probable loss including qualitative factors. The probable loss considers the probability of default, the loss given default, and certain qualitative factors as determined by loan category and risk rating. The probability of default and loss given default are based on industry data. Industry data will continue to be used until sufficient internal data becomes available. The qualitative factors consider credit concentrations, recent levels and trends in delinquencies and nonaccrual loans, and growth in the loan portfolio. The occurrence of certain events could result in changes to the expected loss factors. Accordingly, these expected loss factors are reviewed periodically and modified as necessary.
Each loan is assigned a risk rating during the approval process. This process begins with a rating recommendation from the loan officer responsible for originating the loan. The rating recommendation is subject to approvals from other members of management and/or loan committees depending on the size and type of credit. Ratings are re-evaluated on a quarterly basis. Additionally, an independent holding company credit review function evaluates each bank’s risk rating process at least every twelve to eighteen months.
Impaired Loans
Management considers a loan to be impaired when the ultimate collectibility of all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement are in doubt. A majority of our impaired loans are collateral-dependent. The net carrying amount of collateral-dependent impaired loans is equal to the lower of the loans principal balance or the fair value of the collateral (less estimated costs to sell) not only at the date at which impairment is initially recognized, but also at each subsequent reporting period. Accordingly, our policy requires that we update the fair value of the collateral securing collateral-dependent impaired loans each calendar quarter. Impaired loans, not including impaired loans held for sale, had a net carrying value of $479.3 million at June 30, 2008. Most of these loans are secured by real estate, with the majority classified as collateral-dependent loans. The fair value of the real estate securing these loans is generally determined based upon appraisals performed by a certified or licensed appraiser. Management also considers other factors or recent developments which could result in adjustments to the collateral value estimates indicated in the appraisals.
Estimated losses on collateral-dependent impaired loans are typically charged-off. At June 30, 2008, $424.5 million, or 67.8%, of non-performing loans consisted of collateral-dependent impaired loans for which there is no allowance for loan losses as the estimated losses have been charged-off. These loans are recorded at the estimated fair value of the underlying collateral net of selling costs. However, if a collateral-dependent loan is placed on impaired status at or near the end of a calendar quarter, management records an allowance for loan losses based on the loan’s risk rating while an appraisal is being obtained. At June 30, 2008, Synovus had $54.8 million in collateral-dependent impaired loans with a recorded allocated allowance for loan losses of $10.4 million, or 19.0% of the principal balance. The estimated losses on these loans will be recorded as a charge-off during the third quarter of 2008 after the receipt of a current appraisal or fair value estimate based on current market conditions, including absorption rates. Management does not expect a material difference between the current allocated allowance on these loans and the actual charge-off.

29


Table of Contents

Retail Loans — Expected Loss Factors
The allocated allowance for loan losses for retail loans is generally determined by segregating the retail loan portfolio into pools of homogeneous loan categories. Expected loss factors applied to these pools are based on the probable loss including qualitative factors. The probable loss considers the probability of default, the loss given default, and certain qualitative factors as determined by loan category and risk rating. Through December 31, 2007, the probability of default loss factors were based on industry data. Beginning January 1, 2008, the probability of default loss factors are based on internal default experience because this was the first reporting period when sufficient internal default data became available. Synovus believes that this data provides a more accurate estimate of probability of default considering the lower inherent risk of the retail portfolio and lower than expected charge-offs. This change resulted in a reduction in the allocated allowance for loan losses for the retail portfolio of approximately $19 million during the three months ended March 31, 2008. The loss given default factors continue to be based on industry data because sufficient internal data is not yet available. The qualitative factors consider credit concentrations, recent levels and trends in delinquencies and nonaccrual loans, and growth in the loan portfolio. The occurrence of certain events could result in changes to the loss factors. Accordingly, these loss factors are reviewed periodically and modified as necessary.
Unallocated Component
The unallocated component of the allowance for loan losses is considered necessary to provide for certain environmental and economic factors that effect the probable loss inherent in the entire loan portfolio. Unallocated loss factors included in the determination of the unallocated allowance are economic factors, changes in the experience, ability, and depth of lending management and staff, and changes in lending policies and procedures, including underwriting standards. Certain macro- economic factors and changes in business conditions and developments could have a material impact on the collectibility of the overall portfolio. As an example, a rapidly rising interest rate environment could have a material impact on certain borrowers’ ability to pay. The unallocated component is meant to cover such risks.
Income Taxes
Note 17 to the consolidated financial statements in Synovus’ 2007 Annual Report contains a discussion of income taxes. The calculation of Synovus’ income tax provision is complex and requires the use of estimates and judgments in its determination. As part of Synovus’ overall business strategy, management must consider tax laws and regulations that apply to the specific facts and circumstances under consideration. This analysis includes the amount and timing of the realization of income tax liabilities or benefits. Management closely monitors tax developments on both the state and federal level in order to evaluate the effect they may have on Synovus’ overall tax position. At June 30, 2008, Synovus concluded that it did not need a valuation allowance for its deferred income tax assets and had a net accrual of $6.4 million for unrecognized tax benefits.
Asset Impairment

Goodwill
Under SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” (SFAS No. 142) goodwill is required to be tested for impairment annually, or more frequently if events or circumstances indicate that there may be impairment. The combination of the income approach utilizing the

30


Table of Contents

discounted cash flow (DCF) method, the public company comparables approach, utilizing multiples of tangible book value, and the transaction approach, utilizing readily available market valuation multiples for closed transactions, is used to estimate the fair value of the reporting unit.
Impairment is tested at the reporting unit (sub-segment) level involving two steps. Step 1 compares the fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying value. If the fair value is greater than carrying value, there is no indication of impairment. Step 2 is performed when the fair value determined in Step 1 is less than the carrying value. Step 2 involves a process similar to business combination accounting where fair values are assigned to all assets, liabilities, and intangibles. The result of Step 2 is the implied fair value of goodwill. If the Step 2 implied value of goodwill is less than the recorded goodwill, an impairment charge is recorded for the difference. The total of all reporting unit fair values is compared for reasonableness to Synovus’ market capitalization plus a control premium.
Goodwill at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 was $492.1 million and $519.1 million, respectively. During the three months ended June 30, 2008, Synovus conducted its annual goodwill impairment evaluation. As a result of this evaluation, Synovus recognized a non-cash charge for impairment of goodwill of $27.0 million (pre-tax and after-tax) on one of its reporting units. The change has been recorded as a component of non-interest expense. The goodwill impairment charge was primarily related to a decrease in valuation based on market trading and transaction multiples.
The goodwill impairment charge is preliminary and is subject to the finalization of the Step 2 calculation; however, based on preliminary Step 2 results, Synovus does not expect a significant change in the impairment charge.
An extended period of future significant deterioration in credit and financial markets could result in additional impairment of Synovus’ goodwill.  
Long-Lived Assets and Other Intangibles
Synovus reviews long-lived assets, such as property and equipment and other intangibles subject to amortization, including core deposit premiums and customer relationships, for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the actual cash flows are not consistent with Synovus’ estimates, an impairment charge may result.
Discontinued Operations
Refer to Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements (unaudited) as of and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 for a discussion of discontinued operations.
Balance Sheet
During the first six months of 2008, total assets increased $1.21 billion. The more significant increases consisted of loans, net of unearned income, up $947.3 million and investment securities available for sale up $147.4 million.
The balance sheet growth during the first six months of 2008 was funded through an increase in brokered deposits of $834.8 million, core deposits of $233.8 million, and Federal Home Loan Bank advances (a component of long-term debt) of $232.3 million.

31


Table of Contents

Adoption of SFAS Nos. 157 and 159
SFAS No. 157 establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with U.S. GAAP, clarifies the definition of fair value within that framework, and expands disclosures about the use of fair value measurements. SFAS No. 159 permits entities to make an irrevocable election, at specified election dates, to measure eligible financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. Fair value is used on a recurring basis for certain assets and liabilities in which fair value is the primary basis of accounting. Fair value is used on a non-recurring basis for collateral-dependent impaired loans. Examples of recurring use of fair value include trading account assets, mortgage loans held for sale, investment securities available for sale, private equity investments, derivative instruments, and trading account liabilities. The extent to which fair value is used on a recurring basis was expanded upon the adoption of SFAS No. 159 during the first quarter, effective on January 1, 2008. At June 30, 2008, approximately $4.67 billion, or 13.7%, of total assets were recorded at fair value, which includes items measured on a recurring and non-recurring basis.
Fair value is the price that could be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. Fair value determination in accordance with SFAS No. 157 requires that a number of significant judgments be made. The standard also establishes a three-level hierarchy for fair value measurements based upon the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability as of the measurement date. Synovus has an established and well-documented process for determining fair values and fair value hierarchy classifications. Fair value is based upon quoted market prices, where available (Level 1). Where prices for identical assets and liabilities are not available, SFAS No. 157 requires that similar assets and liabilities are identified (Level 2). If observable market prices are unavailable or impracticable to obtain, or similar assets cannot be identified, then fair value is estimated using internally-developed valuation modeling techniques such as discounted cash flow analyses that primarily use as inputs market-based or independently sourced market parameters (Level 3). These modeling techniques incorporate assessments regarding assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or the liability. The assessments with respect to assumptions that market participants would make are inherently difficult to determine and use of different assumptions could result in material changes to these fair value measurements.
The following table summarizes the assets accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis by level within the valuation hierarchy at June 30, 2008.
                                                             
      June 30, 2008  
                          Investment                          
      Trading       Mortgage       securities                          
      account       loans held       available for       Private equity                  
(dollars in millions)     assets       for sale       sale       investments       Derivative assets       Total  
Level 1
      4 %                               6         %
Level 2
      96         100         96                 94         95  
Level 3
                      4         100                 5  
 
                                               
Total
      100 %       100 %       100 %       100 %       100 %       100 %
 
                                               
Total assets held at fair value on the balance sheet
    $ 20.2       $ 185.2       $ 3,814.4       $ 65.0       $ 109.2       $ 4,194.1  
 
                                                           
Level 3 assets as a percentage of total assets measured at fair value
                                                        4.77 %

32


Table of Contents

The following table summarizes the liabilities accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis by level within the valuation hierarchy at June 30, 2008.
                                         
      June 30, 2008  
      Brokered                          
      certificates of       Trading account       Derivative          
(dollars in millions)     deposit       liabilities       liabilities       Total  
Level 1
      %               10         4 %
Level 2
      100         100         90         96  
Level 3
                               
 
                               
Total
      100 %       100 %       100 %       100 %
 
                               
Total liabilities held at fair value on the balance sheet
    $ 90.7       $ 10.6       $ 66.1       $ 167.4  
 
Level 3 liabilities as a percentage of total liabilities measured at fair value
                                    %
In estimating the fair values for investment securities and most derivative financial instruments, independent, third-party market prices are the best evidence of exit price and, where available, Synovus bases estimates on such prices. If such third-party market prices are not available on the exact securities that Synovus owns, fair values are based on the market prices of similar instruments, third-party broker quotes, or are estimated using industry-standard or proprietary models whose inputs may be unobservable. When market observable data is not available, the valuation of financial instruments becomes more subjective and involves substantial judgment. The need to use unobservable inputs generally results from the lack of market liquidity for certain types of loans and securities, which results in diminished observability of both actual trades and assumptions that would otherwise be available to value these instruments. When fair values are estimated based on internal models, relevant market indices that correlate to the underlying collateral are considered, along with assumptions such as interest rates, prepayment speeds, default rates, and discount rates.
The valuation for mortgage loans held for sale (MLHFS) is based upon forward settlement of a pool of loans of identical coupon, maturity, product, and credit attributes. The model is continuously updated with available market and historical data. The valuation methodology of nonpublic private equity investments requires significant management judgment due to the absence of quoted market prices, inherent lack of liquidity, and the long-term nature of such assets. Private equity investments are valued initially based upon transaction price. Thereafter, Synovus uses information provided by the fund managers in the initial determination of estimated fair value. Valuation factors such as recent or proposed purchase or sale of debt or equity of the issuer, pricing by other dealers in similar securities, size of position held, liquidity of the market and changes in economic conditions affecting the issuer are used in the final determination of estimated fair value.
Valuation methodologies are reviewed each quarter to ensure that fair value estimates are appropriate. Any changes to the valuation methodologies are reviewed by management to confirm the changes are justified. As markets and products develop and the pricing for certain products becomes more or less transparent, Synovus continues to refine its valuation methodologies. For a detailed discussion of valuation methodologies, refer to Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements (unaudited) as of and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008.

33


Table of Contents

Trading Account Assets
The trading account assets portfolio, which had a balance of $20.2 million at June 30, 2008, is substantially comprised of mortgage-backed securities which are bought and held principally for sale and delivery to correspondent and retail customers of Synovus. Trading account assets are reported on the consolidated balance sheets at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses included in other operating income on the consolidated statements of income. Synovus recognized a net loss on trading account assets of $239 thousand for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and a net gain of $519 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2008, as compared to a net gain of $563 thousand and $801 thousand, respectively, for the same periods in the prior year.
Impaired Loans Held for Sale
Loans or pools of loans are transferred to the impaired loans held for sale portfolio when the intent to hold the loans has changed due to portfolio management or risk mitigation strategies and when there is a plan to sell the loans within a reasonable period of time. The value of the loans or pools of loans is primarily determined by analyzing the underlying collateral of the loan and the external market prices of similar assets. At the time of transfer, if the fair value is less than the cost, the difference attributable to declines in credit quality is recorded as a charge-off against the allowance for loan losses. Decreases in fair value subsequent to the transfer as well as losses from sale of these loans are recognized as a component of non-interest expense. During the three months ended March 31, 2008, Synovus transferred loans totaling $63.3 million to the impaired loans held for sale portfolio. At the time of the transfer, Synovus recognized a $21.0 million charge-off on these loans, which resulted in a new cost basis of $42.3 million at March 31, 2008. During the three months ended June 30, 2008, Synovus recognized a loss of $4.7 million from the sale of impaired loans held for sale and recognized additional write-downs of $5.4 million on the loans remaining in the portfolio. The $5.4 million write-down was based upon the estimated sales proceeds from a pending liquidation sale.
Other Real Estate
Other real estate, consisting of properties obtained through foreclosure or in satisfaction of loans, is reported at the lower of cost or fair value, determined on the basis of current appraisals, comparable sales, and other estimates of value obtained principally from independent sources, adjusted for estimated selling costs. At the time of foreclosure, any excess of the loan balance over the fair value of the real estate held as collateral is treated as a charge against the allowance for loan losses. Gains or losses on sale and any subsequent adjustments to the value are recorded as a component of non-interest expense.
The carrying value of other real estate was $197.3 million and $101.5 million at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. During the six and three months ended June 30, 2008, approximately $169.8 million of loans and $1.5 million of impaired loans held for sale were foreclosed and transferred to other real estate. The increased in other real estate is the result of negative migration in credit quality, the declining value of real estate in certain parts of Florida and the excess supply of residential real estate in the Atlanta area. During the six and three months ended June 30, 2008, Synovus recognized other real estate costs of $21.4 million and $13.5 million, respectively. These costs primarily relate to losses from the liquidation of other real estate through bulk sales and auctions as well as further write-downs due to declines in fair value subsequent to the date of foreclosure and, to a lesser degree, carrying costs associated with other real estate.

34


Table of Contents

Loans
The following table compares the composition of the loan portfolio at June 30, 2008, December 31, 2007, and June 30, 2007.
                                           
      Total Loans     Total Loans  
                      June 30,             June 30,  
                      2008 vs.             2008 vs.  
          Dec. 31,             June 30,  
(Dollars in thousands)     June 30,     Dec. 31,     2007     June 30,     2007  
Loan Type     2008     2007     % change(1)     2007     % change  
Multi-family
    $ 527,881     $ 452,163       33.7 %   $ 489,453       7.9 %
Hotels
      756,492       614,979       46.3       581,376       30.1  
Office buildings
      966,171       953,093       2.8       856,999       12.7  
Shopping centers
      965,130       834,025       31.6       712,210       35.5  
Commercial development
      909,965       961,271       (10.7 )     919,965       (1.1 )
Other investment property
      873,902       714,296       44.9       687,683       27.1  
 
                               
Total Investment Properties
      4,999,541       4,529,827       20.9       4,247,686       17.7  
 
                               
 
                                         
1-4 family construction
      1,971,819       2,238,925       (24.0 )     2,382,147       (17.2 )
1-4 family perm /mini-perm
      1,350,463       1,273,843       12.1       1,167,658       15.7  
Residential development
      2,227,709       2,311,459       (7.3 )     2,297,807       (3.1 )
 
                               
Total 1-4 Family Properties
      5,549,991       5,824,227       (9.5 )     5,847,612       (5.1 )
 
                               
 
                                         
Land Acquisition
      1,569,618       1,545,933       3.1       1,430,431       9.7  
 
                               
 
                                         
Total Commercial Real Estate (2)
      12,119,150       11,899,987       3.7       11,525,729       5.1  
 
                               
 
                                         
Commercial, financial, and agricultural
      6,788,276       6,420,689       11.5       6,240,987       8.8  
Owner-occupied
      4,367,743       4,226,707       6.7       4,095,800       6.6  
 
                               
Total Commercial and Industrial
      11,156,019       10,647,396       9.6       10,336,787       7.9  
 
                                         
Home equity
      1,632,551       1,543,701       11.6       1,417,681       15.2  
Consumer mortgages
      1,723,689       1,667,924       6.7       1,544,932       11.6  
Credit card
      299,850       291,149       6.0       280,805       6.8  
Other retail loans
      555,507       494,591       24.8       483,820       14.8  
 
                               
Total Retail
      4,211,597       3,997,365       10.8       3,727,238       13.0  
 
                               
Unearned Income
      (40,875 )     (46,163 )     (23.0 )     (48,012 )     (14.9 )
 
                               
 
                                         
Total
    $ 27,445,891     $ 26,498,585       7.2 %   $ 25,541,742       7.5 %
 
                               
 
(1)   Percentage changes are annualized.
 
(2)   Commercial real estate represents 44.2%, 44.9% and 45.1% of total loans at June 30, 2008, December 31, 2007 and June 30, 2007, respectively.

35


Table of Contents

At June 30, 2008, loans outstanding were $27.45 billion, an increase of $1.90 billion, or 7.5%, compared to June 30, 2007. On a sequential quarter basis, total loans outstanding grew by $328.4 million or 4.9% annualized.
At June 30, 2008, Synovus had 48 loan relationships with total commitments of $50 million or more (including amounts funded). The average funded balance of these relationships at June 30, 2008 was approximately $53 million.
Total loans as of June 30, 2008 for the five southeastern state areas in which Synovus’ banks are located are summarized in the following table:
                                         
                          Dec. 31,       June 30,  
      June 30, 2008       2007       2007  
                As a % of       As a % of       As a % of  
                Total Loan       Total Loan       Total Loan  
(Dollars in thousands)     Total Loans       Portfolio       Portfolio       Portfolio  
Georgia (1)
    $ 14,543,534         53.0 %       52.5         52.6  
 
                                       
Atlanta
      5,427,321         19.8 %       19.9         19.6  
Florida (1)
      3,593,893         13.1 %       13.6         14.0  
West Coast of Florida
      2,847,694         10.4 %       10.8         11.2  
South Carolina
      4,123,435         15.0 %       15.0         14.9  
Tennessee
      1,287,412         4.7 %       4.8         4.5  
Alabama
      3,897,617         14.2 %       14.1         14.0  
 
                               
 
                                       
Total
    $ 27,445,891         100.0 %       100.0         100.0  
 
                               
 
(1)   Loans in Georgia and Florida collectively represent 66.1% of our loan portfolio as of June 30, 2008.
At June 30, 2008, total loans in the Atlanta market were $5.43 billion, or 19.8% of the total loan portfolio, and increased $425.9 million, or 8.5%, compared to the same period in the prior year. The Atlanta market includes commercial real estate (CRE) loans of $3.10 billion (which includes $1.55 billion in 1-4 family properties) and commercial and industrial (C&I) loans of $1.91 billion at June 30, 2008. Compared to June 30, 2007, CRE loans and C&I loans in the Atlanta market increased by $122.8 million, or 4.1%, and $266.0 million, or 16.1%, respectively. On a sequential quarter basis, Atlanta market loans grew at an annualized rate of 1.8%, CRE loan growth declined at an annualized rate of 4.2%, and C&I loans grew at an annualized rate of 8.2%.
Total loans in the West Coast of Florida market were $2.85 billion, or 10.4% of the total loan portfolio at June 30, 2008, and decreased $1.8 million, or 0.06% compared to the same period in the prior year. The West Coast of Florida market includes CRE loans of $1.35 billion (which includes $496.1 million in 1-4 family properties) and C&I loans of $1.16 billion at June 30, 2008. Compared to June 30, 2007, CRE loans in the West Coast of Florida market decreased by $136.8 million, or 9.2%, and C&I loans increased by $101.3 million, or 9.6%. On a sequential quarter basis, loans within the West Coast of Florida market remained relatively flat, declining at an annualized rate of 0.5%, CRE loans declined at an annualized rate of 3.7%, and C&I loans grew at an annualized rate of 0.6%.

36


Table of Contents

Loans for investment property grew by $469.7 million, or 20.9% annualized, from December 31, 2007, and increased $751.9 million, or 17.7%, compared to June 30, 2007. The primary loan types which contributed to the growth within the investment property portfolio compared to December 31, 2007 were the hotels, office buildings, and other investment property (primarily leased warehouses) categories. The growth in the investment property portfolio during the first six months of 2008 is primarily due to advances on existing commitments. In addition, the continued impact of a lack of exit capabilities in the market place with commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS) has increased the duration of the investment property portfolio.
Commercial loans for 1-4 family properties at June 30, 2008 were $5.55 billion, down 9.5% annualized from December 31, 2007 and accounted for 20.2% of total loans outstanding as of June 30, 2008. The following table shows the composition of the 1-4 family portfolio as of June 30, 2008:
                                         
      June 30, 2008  
                % of Total                 % of Total  
      1-4 Family       1-4 Family       1-4 Family       1-4 Family  
(Dollars in thousands)     Portfolio       Portfolio       NPL       NPL  
Georgia
    $ 3,222,457         58.0 %     $ 290,791         71.2 %
 
                                       
Atlanta
      1,553,137         28.0 %       233,929         57.4 %
Florida
      648,510         11.7 %       70,319         17.3 %
West Coast of Florida
      496,121         8.9 %       66,629         16.3 %
South Carolina
      920,627         16.6 %       20,998         5.2 %
Tennessee
      178,285         3.2 %       20,259         5.0 %
Alabama
      580,112         10.5 %       5,264         1.3 %
 
                               
Total
    $ 5,549,991         100.0 %     $ 407,631         100.0 %
 
                               
Retail loans at June 30, 2008 totaled $4.21 billion, representing 15.3% of the total loan portfolio. Total retail loans grew by 13.0% compared to June 30, 2007 and grew at an annualized rate of 16.2% on a sequential basis, led principally by growth in home equity and consumer mortgage loans. The home equity loan portfolio consists primarily of loans with strong credit scores, conservative debt-to-income ratios, and appropriate loan-to-value ratios. The utilization rate (total amount outstanding as a percentage of total available lines) of this portfolio was approximately 59% at June 30, 2008, compared to 57% a year ago. These loans are primarily extended to customers who have an existing banking relationship with Synovus.
Credit Quality
Non-performing assets were $830.3 million at June 30, 2008, an increase of $150.9 million compared to March 31, 2008, which included increases of $111.3 million in non-performing loans, $75.6 million in other real estate (ORE), and was partially off-set by a decrease of $35.9 million in impaired loans held for sale. The increase in non-performing assets was significantly impacted by the Atlanta market, where non-performing assets increased by $81.4 million. The Atlanta market accounted for 45.9%, or $51.0 million, of the $111.3 million increase in non-performing loans during the three months ended June 30, 2008. Total loans within the Atlanta portfolio accounted for 145 basis points of the non-performing assets ratio at June 30, 2008, and 29 basis points of the sequential quarter increase.
The non-performing assets ratio (NPA ratio — non-performing loans plus impaired loans held

37


Table of Contents

for sale and other real estate divided by total loans, impaired loans held for sale, and other real estate) at June 30, 2008 was 3.00% compared to 1.67% at December 31, 2007 and 0.87% at June 30, 2007. The net charge-off ratio for the three months ended June 30, 2008 was 1.04% compared to 0.25% for the same period in the prior year and 0.46% for the year ended December 31, 2007. The net charge-off ratio for the six months ended June 30, 2008 was 0.99% compared to 0.19% during the same period in the prior year.
The following table shows the NPA ratio by state as of June 30, 2008, December 31, 2007, and June 30, 2007.
                               
      June 30,     December 31,     June 30,
      2008     2007     2007
Georgia
      3.76 %       1.70 %       0.88 %
Atlanta
      7.24         3.06         1.39  
Florida
      4.36         4.12         1.65  
West Florida
      5.24         5.11         2.01  
South Carolina
      1.35         0.55         0.33  
Tennessee
      2.64         0.63         0.83  
Alabama
      0.77         0.71         0.61  
 
                             
Consolidated
      3.00 %       1.67 %       0.87 %
 
                             
Net charge-offs for the three months ended June 30, 2008 were $70.7 million, an increase of $54.7 million compared to the same period a year ago. Net charge-offs for the three months ended June 30, 2008 included $22.9 million, or 33 basis points, of charge-offs from the Atlanta portfolio, and $12.0 million, or 17 basis points, of charge-offs from the West Coast of Florida portfolio. Net charge-offs for the six months ended June 30, 2008 were $134.5 million, an increase of $110.3 million compared to the same period in the prior year, and included $41.4 million, or 31 basis points, of charge-offs within the Atlanta portfolio, and $40.2 million, or 30 basis points, in charge-offs from the West Coast of Florida portfolio. The net charge-off ratio for the six months ended June 30, 2008 was 0.99% compared to 0.19% for the same period in 2007 and 0.46% for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Provision expense for the six months ended June 30, 2008 was $184.7 million, an increase of $143.9 million compared to the same period in the prior year. The Atlanta market accounted for $36.7 million of the total provision expense, while the West Coast of Florida market accounted for $46.2 million of the total provision expense for the six months ended June 30, 2008.
Total past due loans (and still accruing interest) were 1.33% of total loans at June 30, 2008 compared to 1.02% at December 31, 2007, and 0.64% at June 30, 2007. The year over year increase was primarily due to increases in the one to four family residential portfolios in the Atlanta and West Coast of Florida markets. Loans over 90 days past due and still accruing interest at June 30, 2008 were $39.6 million, or 0.14% of total loans, compared to 0.13% at December 31, 2007, and 0.09% at June 30, 2007.
The allowance for loan losses was $417.8 million, or 1.52% of net loans, at June 30, 2008 compared to $367.6 million, or 1.39% of net loans, at December 31, 2007, and $331.1 million, or 1.30% of net loans, at June 30, 2007. The allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans coverage was 66.68% at June 30, 2008, compared to 107.46% at December 31, 2007, and

38


Table of Contents

183.17% at June 30, 2007. The decline in the coverage ratio is impacted by the increase in collateral-dependent impaired loans, which have no allowance for loan losses as the estimated losses on these credits have been charged-off. Therefore, a more meaningful allowance for loan losses coverage ratio is the allowance to non-performing loans (excluding collateral-dependent impaired loans for which there is no related allowance for loan losses), which was 206.82% at June 30, 2008, compared to 337.49% at December 31, 2007 and 417.79% at June 30, 2007.
During times when non-performing loans are not significant, this coverage ratio – which measures the allowance for loan losses (which is there for the entire loan portfolio) against a small non-performing loans total – appears very large. As non-performing loans increase, this ratio will decline even with significant incremental additions to the allowance.
The allowance for loan losses allocated to non-performing loans (exclusive of collateral-dependent impaired loans which have no allowance, as the estimated losses on these loans have already been recognized) is as follows:
                               
                December 31,          
(Dollars in millions)     June 30, 2008       2007       June 30, 2007  
Non-performing loans, excluding collateral dependent impaired loans which have no allowance
    $ 202.0       $ 108.9       $ 79.3  
 
                       
Total allocated allowance for loan losses on above loans
    $ 41.2       $ 20.5       $ 22.9  
 
                       
Allocated allowance as a % of loans
      20.4 %       18.8 %       28.9 %
 
                       
Collateral-dependent impaired loans which have no allowance at June 30, 2008 (because they are carried at fair value net of selling costs) totaled $424.5 million, or 67.8% of non-performing loans. Net charge-offs recognized on collateral dependent impaired loans during the three months ended June 30, 2008 were $26.5 million.
As of June 30, 2008, the carrying value of impaired loans was $479.3 million. This balance reflects approximately $63.7 million in partial charge-offs (approximately 12.0% of the original unpaid principal balance) which we have recognized on these loans since they were placed on impaired status.

39


Table of Contents

The table below includes selected credit quality metrics.
                     
(Dollars in thousands)     June 30, 2008       December 31, 2007  
Non-performing loans (1)
    $ 626,571         342,082  
Impaired loans held for sale (2)
      6,365          
Other real estate
      197,328         101,487  
 
               
Non-performing assets
    $ 830,264         443,569  
 
               
 
                   
Net charge-offs – quarter
    $ 70,652         59,916  
 
               
Net charge-offs/Avg. loans – quarter (3)
      1.04 %       0.91 %
 
               
 
                   
Net charge-offs — YTD
    $ 134,465         117,055  
Net charge-offs/Avg. loans — YTD
      0.99 %       0.46 %
 
                   
Loans over 90 days past due and still accruing
    $ 39,614         33,663  
 
               
As a % of loans
      0.14 %       0.13 %
 
               
 
                   
Total past due loans and still accruing
    $ 365,046         270,496  
 
               
As a % of loans
      1.33 %       1.02 %
 
               
 
                   
Allowance for loan losses
    $ 417,813         367,613  
 
               
Allowance for loan losses as a % of loans
      1.52 %       1.39 %
 
               
Non-performing loans as a % of total loans
      2.29 %       1.29 %
 
               
Non-performing assets as a % of total loans, impaired loans held for sale, and ORE
      3.00 %       1.67 %
 
               
 
                   
Allowance to non-performing loans
      66.68 %       107.46 %
 
               
Allowance to non-performing loans, excluding impaired loans for which there is no related allowance for loan losses (4)
      206.82 %       337.49 %
 
               
 
(1)   Includes $424.5 million and $233.2 million at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively, of loans considered to be impaired (consisting of collateral-dependent loans) for which there is no related allowance for loan losses determined in accordance with SFAS No. 114, “Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan.” The allowance on these loans is zero because the estimated losses on collateral-dependent impaired loans have been charged-off, at the time these loans were considered to be impaired.
 
(2)   Represent impaired loans that are intended to be sold. Held for sale loans are carried at lower of cost or fair value.
 
(3)   Ratio is annualized.
 
(4)   Impaired loans for which there is no related allowance for loan losses as described in note (1).
Management continuously monitors non-performing and past due loans, to mitigate further deterioration regarding the condition of these loans. Management believes non-performing loans and loans past due over 90 days and still accruing include all material loans where known information about possible credit problems of borrowers causes management to have serious

40


Table of Contents

doubts as to the collectibility of amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement.
The following table shows the composition of the loan portfolio and non-performing loans (classified by loan type) as of June 30, 2008:
                                         
                                    % of  
                          Total       Total  
                % of       Non-       Non-  
(Dollars in thousands)               Total Loans       performing       performing  
Loan Type     Total Loans       Outstanding       Loans       Loans  
Multi-family
    $ 527,881         1.9 %     $ 1,552         0.2 %
Hotels
      756,492         2.8         766         0.1  
Office buildings
      966,171         3.5         3,119         0.5  
Shopping centers
      965,130         3.6         1,031         0.2  
Commercial development
      909,965         3.3         12,573         2.0  
Other investment property
      873,902         3.2                  
 
                               
Total Investment Properties
      4,999,541         18.3         19,041         3.0  
 
                               
 
                                       
1-4 family construction
      1,971,819         7.2         220,194         35.1  
1-4 family perm /mini-perm
      1,350,463         4.9         32,661         5.2  
Residential development
      2,227,709         8.1         154,776         24.7  
 
                               
Total 1-4 Family Properties
      5,549,991         20.2         407,631         65.0  
 
                               
 
                                       
Land Acquisition
      1,569,618         5.7         75,623         12.1  
 
                               
 
                                       
Total Commercial Real Estate
      12,119,150         44.2         502,295         80.1  
 
                               
 
                                       
Commercial, financial, and agricultural
      6,788,276         24.7         70,608         11.3  
Owner-occupied
      4,367,743         15.9         32,345         5.2  
 
                               
Total Commercial and Industrial Loans
      11,156,019         40.6         102,953         16.5  
 
                                       
Home equity
      1,632,551         5.9         6,771         1.1  
Consumer mortgages
      1,723,689         6.3         12,486         2.0  
Credit card
      299,850         1.1                  
Other retail loans
      555,507         2.0         2,066         0.3  
 
                               
Total Retail
      4,211,597         15.3         21,323         3.4  
Unearned Income
      (40,875 )       (0.1 )                
 
                               
 
                                       
Total
    $ 27,445,891         100.0 %     $ 626,571         100.0 %
 
                               

41


Table of Contents

Deposits
The following table presents the composition of deposits:
                               
                December 31,          
(in thousands)     June 30, 2008       2007       June 30, 2007  
Demand deposits
    $ 3,553,342         3,472,423         3,638,434  
Money market
      6,784,667         7,091,885         7,264,790  
NOW
      3,247,978         3,362,572         3,195,501  
Savings
      459,888         442,824         489,467  
Time deposits
      7,395,175         6,837,570         6,999,593  
 
                       
Total core deposits
    $ 21,441,050         21,207,274         21,587,785  
Brokered money market
      1,019,501         465,146         437,988  
Brokered time deposits
      3,567,801         3,287,396         3,275,948  
 
                       
Total deposits
    $ 26,028,352         24,959,816         25,301,721  
 
                       
Total deposits at June 30, 2008 were $26.03 billion, an increase of $1.07 billion, or 8.6% annualized, compared to December 31, 2007, and an increase of $726.6 million, or 2.9%, compared to June 30, 2007. Total deposits excluding brokered deposits (core deposits) increased $233.8 million, or 2.2% annualized, compared to December 31, 2007, and decreased $146.7 million, or 0.7%, compared to June 30, 2007. On a year over year basis, the decline was primarily related to a decline in money market accounts, which decreased $480.1 million, or 6.6%, compared to the same period in 2007. Actions currently being taken by Synovus to address deposit growth include modifications to the incentive compensation programs to include a significant component of actual incentives paid to be based on core deposit growth. On a sequential quarter basis, core deposits increased $218.9 million, or 4.1% annualized. The majority of the growth was within time deposit and non-interest bearing demand deposit accounts. On April 1, 2008, Synovus implemented a new company-wide sales campaign, which focused on growing non-interest bearing deposit accounts in both the commercial and retail customer bases. Synovus has also developed new money market and NOW account products that were offered to commercial and retail customers during the three months ended June 30, 3008.
Capital Resources and Liquidity
Synovus has always placed great emphasis on maintaining a strong capital base and continues to exceed regulatory capital requirements. Management is committed to maintaining a capital level sufficient to assure shareholders, customers, and regulators that Synovus is financially sound, and to enable Synovus to sustain an appropriate degree of leverage to provide a desirable level of profitability. Based on internal calculations and previous regulatory exams, each of the subsidiary banks is currently in compliance with regulatory capital guidelines and is considered well capitalized.

42


Table of Contents

The following table presents certain ratios used to measure Synovus’ capitalization:
                     
(in thousands)     June 30, 2008       December 31, 2007  
Total risk-based capital
    $ 3,987,595       $ 3,988,171  
Total risk-based capital to risk-weighted assets ratio
      12.29 %       12.66 %
Tier 1 capital ratio
      8.91 %       9.11 %
Leverage ratio
      8.70 %       8.65 %
Equity to assets ratio
      10.02 %       10.42 %
Tangible equity to tangible assets ratio (1)
      8.64 %       8.91 %
 
               
 
(1)   Excludes the carrying value of goodwill and other intangible assets from shareholders’ equity and total assets.
Continued credit deterioration and the resulting increases in non-performing assets and the allowance for loan losses and a corresponding decrease in Synovus’ net interest margin may adversely impact our liquidity position and capital ratios.
Synovus’ management, operating under liquidity and funding policies approved by the Board of Directors, actively analyzes and manages the liquidity position in coordination with the subsidiary banks. Management must ensure that adequate liquidity, at a reasonable cost, is available to meet the cash flow needs of depositors, borrowers, and creditors. Management constantly monitors and maintains appropriate levels of assets and liabilities so as to provide adequate funding sources to meet estimated customer deposit withdrawals and future loan requests. Subsidiary banks have access to overnight federal funds lines with various financial institutions, which can be drawn upon for short-term liquidity needs. Subsidiary banks’ utilization of this funding source increased modestly during the second quarter.
The Parent Company requires cash for various operating needs including payment of dividends to shareholders, acquisitions, capital infusions into subsidiaries, the servicing of debt, and the payment of general corporate expenses. The primary source of liquidity for the Parent Company is dividends from the subsidiary banks, which are governed by certain rules and regulations of various state and federal banking regulatory agencies. See the discussion of “Dividends Per Share” below in this report. As a short-term liquidity source, the Parent Company has access to a $25 million line of credit with an unaffiliated banking organization. There were no borrowings outstanding on this line of credit at June 30, 2008. The Parent Company has historically enjoyed a solid reputation and credit standing in the capital markets and has the ability to raise funds in the form of either short or long-term borrowings or equity issuances. Maintaining adequate credit ratings is essential to Synovus’ continued cost-effective access to these capital market funding sources. Given the weakened economy and current market conditions, there is no assurance that the Parent Company will, if it chooses to do so, be able to obtain new borrowings or issue additional equity on terms that are satisfactory. Synovus believes that the sources of liquidity discussed above are sufficient to meet its anticipated funding needs.
The consolidated statements of cash flows detail cash flows from operating, investing, and financing activities. For the six months ended June 30, 2008, operating activities provided net cash of $348.2 million, investing activities used $1.50 billion, and financing activities provided $1.15 billion, resulting in a decrease in cash and due from banks of $7.7 million.

43


Table of Contents

Earning Assets, Sources of Funds, and Net Interest Income
Average total assets of continuing operations for the first six months of 2008 were $33.4 billion, an increase of 7.8% compared to the first six months of 2007. Average earning assets increased 6.6% in the first six months of 2008 compared to the same period in 2007, and represented 91.7% of average total assets. Average deposits increased $589.4 million, average federal funds purchased and other short-term liabilities increased $567.8 million, average long-term debt increased $492.2 million, and average shareholders’ equity increased $668.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 as compared to the same period last year. This growth provided the funding for $1.80 billion growth in average net loans and $93.8 million growth in average investment securities (available for sale and trading securities).
Net interest income for the six months ended June 30, 2008 was $552.1 million, a decrease of $19.4 million, or 3.4%, compared to $571.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007. Net interest income for the three months ended June 30, 2008 was $273.4 million, a decrease of $15.1 million, or 5.2%, from $288.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007.
The net interest margin for the six months ended June 30, 2008 was 3.64%, down 39 basis points from 4.03% for the six months ended June 30, 2007. Compared to the six months ended June 30, 2007, earning asset yields decreased by 149 basis points. Loan yields declined by 174 basis points, primarily due to a 260 basis point decline in the average prime rate and higher levels of nonperforming loans and interest charge-offs. The decline in earning asset yields was partially offset by a 110 basis point decline in the effective cost of funds. The most significant decreases in funding costs were realized in core money markets, which declined by 189 basis points, and fed funds purchased and other short term liabilities, which declined by 232 basis points.
On a sequential quarter basis, net interest income decreased by $5.2 million, while the net interest margin decreased 14 basis points to 3.57%. The net interest margin decline included a 3 basis point decrease related to increased credit costs, which results from loans placed on non-accrual and the reversal of accrued interest on those loans at the time of their change to non-accrual status. The remainder of the decline was primarily due to lower average short-term rates and the continued very competitive deposit markets. Yields on earning assets declined by 73 basis points as loan yields decreased by 82 basis points. This decrease was driven by a 113 basis point decrease in the average prime rate and a higher level of non-performing loans and interest charge-offs. The effective cost of funds decreased by 59 basis points. This decrease was driven by a 83 basis point decrease in core money market yields and a 115 basis point decrease in the cost of federal funds purchased and other short-term liabilities.
The direction of the margin during the remainder of 2008 will be significantly influenced by deposit pricing competition, trends in credit costs, and any additional Federal Reserve Bank rate actions. Competitive deposit market conditions are not expected to moderate in the near term and could negatively impact the margin in the second half of this year.

44


Table of Contents

Quarterly yields earned on average interest-earning assets and rates paid on average interest-bearing liabilities for the five most recent quarters are presented below:
                                         
    2008   2007
    Second   First   Fourth   Third   Second
(dollars in thousands)   Quarter   Quarter   Quarter   Quarter   Quarter
     
Interest Earning Assets
                                       
Taxable investment securities
  $ 3,556,381       3,485,370       3,496,843       3,495,017       3,420,831  
Yield
    5.00 %     5.01       4.90       4.82       4.83  
Tax-exempt investment securities
  $ 137,606       154,408       164,587       170,211       178,183  
Yield
    7.34 %     7.00       6.82       6.72       6.75  
Trading account assets
  $ 26,531       36,652       29,698       56,217       59,311  
Yield
    5.88 %     6.96       7.05       7.15       6.47  
Commercial loans (1)
  $ 23,183,128       22,763,954       22,157,460       21,820,687       21,739,107  
Yield
    5.96 %     6.79       7.69       8.13       8.20  
Consumer loans
  $ 966,111       931,644       928,942       915,847       896,267  
Yield
    7.53 %     7.86       8.05       8.17       8.14  
Mortgage loans
  $ 1,252,275       1,241,018       1,237,962       1,152,621       1,110,754  
Yield
    6.54 %     6.84       7.04       7.10       7.03  
Credit card loans
  $ 291,143       296,428       285,410       277,445       275,105  
Yield
    8.60 %     9.65       10.26       10.96       10.64  
Home equity loans
  $ 1,605,601       1,557,852       1,517,510       1,444,411       1,407,005  
Yield
    5.31 %     6.48       7.34       7.80       7.82  
Allowance for loan losses
  $ (397,392 )     (381,695 )     (357,283 )     (335,406 )     (329,028 )
     
Loans, net
  $ 26,900,866       26,409,201       25,770,001       25,275,605       25,099,210  
Yield
    6.12 %     6.94       7.79       8.21       8.26  
Mortgage loans held for sale
  $ 157,049       121,806       108,044       176,448       163,364  
Yield
    5.86 %     5.57       6.12       6.91       6.18  
Federal funds sold and other short-term investments
  $ 201,081       128,381       110,745       85,094       131,029  
Yield
    1.83 %     3.41       4.63       5.76       5.37  
     
Total Interest Earning Assets
  $ 30,979,514       30,335,818       29,679,918       29,258,592       29,051,928  
Yield
    5.96 %     6.69       7.42       7.78       7.81  
     
 
                                       
Interest Bearing Liabilities
                                       
Interest bearing demand deposits
  $ 3,154,884       3,200,650       3,200,408       3,047,279       3,141,899  
Rate
    1.10 %     1.56       1.99       2.24       2.28  
Money market accounts
  $ 6,826,724       7,017,644       7,502,063       7,421,900       7,217,265  
Rate
    2.15 %     2.98       3.92       4.40       4.46  
Savings deposits
  $ 461,970       448,581       454,204       479,479       497,422  
Rate
    0.25 %     0.28       0.35       0.48       0.57  
Time deposits under $100,000
  $ 2,814,714       2,777,764       2,790,869       2,917,089       3,020,881  
Rate
    3.97 %     4.44       4.69       4.81       4.85  
Time deposits over $100,000 (less brokered time deposits)
  $ 4,316,454       4,171,716       4,006,350       4,029,091       4,118,221  
Rate
    4.09 %     4.69       4.98       5.12       5.19  
     
Total interest bearing core deposits
  $ 17,574,746       17,616,355       17,953,894       17,894,838       17,995,688  
Rate
    2.68 %     3.29       3.84       4.16       4.20  
Brokered money market accounts
  $ 1,082,805       854,385       467,346       476,377       426,988  
Rate
    2.54 %     3.50       4.89       5.34       5.45  
Brokered time deposits
  $ 3,495,947       3,300,677       2,941,592       3,188,310       3,175,161  
Rate
    3.64 %     4.35       4.98       5.19       5.05  
     
Total interest bearing deposits
  $ 22,153,498       21,771,417       21,362,832       21,559,525       21,597,837  
Rate
    2.82 %     3.46       4.02       4.33       4.35  
Federal funds purchased and other short-term liabilities
  $ 2,302,986       2,253,640       2,472,339       1,930,598       1,720,535  
Rate
    2.03 %     3.18       4.37       4.84       4.96  
Long-term debt
  $ 2,048,213       1,930,412       1,819,198       1,660,788       1,552,310  
Rate
    3.44 %     4.21       5.08       5.32       5.18  
     
Total Interest Bearing Liabilities
  $ 26,504,697       25,955,469       25,654,369       25,150,911       24,870,682  
Rate
    2.80 %     3.48       4.12       4.43       4.44  
     
 
Non-interest bearing demand deposits
  $ 3,448,794       3,338,106       3,422,684       3,405,622       3,428,246  
 
     
Net Interest Margin
    3.57 %     3.71       3.86       3.97       4.00  
     
 
(1)   Impaired loans held for sale are included in commercial loans.

45


Table of Contents

Yields earned on average interest-earning assets and rates paid on average interest-bearing liabilities for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 are presented below:
                 
    Six Months Ended June 30,
(dollars in thousands)   2008   2007
     
Interest Earning Assets
               
Taxable Investment Securities
  $ 3,520,875       3,361,314  
Yield
    4.99 %     4.78  
Tax-Exempt Investment Securities
  $ 146,007       181,579  
Yield
    7.16 %     6.78  
Trading Account Assets
  $ 31,592       61,744  
Yield
    6.40 %     6.01  
Commercial Loans
  $ 22,973,543       21,492,384  
Yield
    6.37 %     8.22  
Consumer Loans
  $ 948,878       912,173  
Yield
    7.69 %     8.07  
Mortgage Loans
  $ 1,246,646       1,096,337  
Yield
    6.69 %     7.01  
Credit Card Loans
  $ 293,785       272,787  
Yield
    9.14 %     10.90  
Home Equity Loans
  $ 1,581,726       1,396,069  
Yield
    5.89 %     7.76  
Allowance for Loan Losses
  $ (389,544 )     (323,533 )
       
Loans, Net
  $ 26,655,034       24,846,217  
Yield
    6.53 %     8.27  
Mortgage Loans Held for Sale
  $ 139,427       161,931  
Yield
    5.75 %     6.13  
Federal funds Sold and Other Short-Term Investments
  $ 164,731       139,397  
Yield
    2.40 %     5.42  
       
Total Interest Earning Assets
  $ 30,657,666       28,752,182  
Yield
    6.32 %     7.81  
       
 
               
Interest Bearing Liabilities
               
Interest Bearing Demand Deposits
  $ 3,177,767       3,127,793  
Rate
    1.33 %     2.29  
Money Market Accounts
  $ 6,922,184       7,098,269  
Rate
    2.57 %     4.46  
Savings Deposits
  $ 455,276       500,170  
Rate
    0.27 %     0.62  
Time Deposits under $100,000
  $ 2,796,239       3,029,301  
Rate
    4.20 %     4.82  
Time Deposits over $100,000 (less brokered time deposits)
  $ 4,244,085       4,109,892  
Rate
    4.38 %     5.17  
       
Total Interest Bearing Core Deposits
  $ 17,595,551       17,865,425  
Rate
    2.98 %     4.20  
Brokered Money Market Accounts
  $ 968,595       392,970  
Rate
    2.97 %     5.46  
Brokered Time Deposits
  $ 3,398,312       3,103,376  
Rate
    3.98 %     5.06  
       
Total Interest Bearing Deposits
  $ 21,962,458       21,361,771  
Rate
    3.01 %     4.25  
Federal funds Purchased and Other Short-Term Liabilities
  $ 2,278,313       1,710,475  
Rate
    2.56 %     4.88  
Long-Term Debt
  $ 1,989,312       1,497,083  
Rate
    3.75 %     5.08  
       
Total Interest Bearing Liabilities
  $ 26,230,083       24,569,329  
Rate
    3.14 %     4.43  
       
 
               
Non-Interest Bearing Demand Deposits
  $ 3,393,450       3,404,781  
 
               
       
Net Interest Margin
    3.64 %     4.03  
       

46


Table of Contents

The following table summarizes the components of net interest income for the six and three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, including the tax-equivalent adjustment that is required in making yields on tax-exempt loans and investment securities comparable to taxable loans and investment securities. The taxable-equivalent adjustment is based on a 35% Federal income tax rate.
                                         
      Six Months Ended       Three Months Ended  
      June 30,       June 30,  
(In thousands)     2008       2007       2008       2007  
Interest income
    $ 962,020         1,112,391         458,140         564,492  
Taxable-equivalent adjustment
      2,311         2,629         1,134         1,285  
 
                               
Interest income,
                                       
Taxable-equivalent
      964,331         1,115,020         459,274         565,777  
Interest expense
      409,950         540,967         184,719         276,017  
 
                               
Net interest income,
                                       
Taxable-equivalent
    $ 554,381         574,053         274,555         289,760  
 
                               
Non-Interest Income
The following table summarizes non-interest income for the six and three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007.
                                     
      Six months ended       Three months ended  
      June 30,       June 30,  
(In thousands)     2008     2007       2008     2007  
Service charges on deposit accounts
    $ 54,461       54,420         26,070       28,050  
Fiduciary and asset management fees
      25,519       25,129         12,898       12,657  
Brokerage and investment banking revenue
      17,693       15,259         9,206       7,809  
Mortgage banking income
      13,847       14,920         5,686       7,695  
Bankcard fees
      26,417       23,447         14,198       11,567  
Net gains on sales of available for sale investment securities
            705               258  
Other fee income
      21,266       19,838         10,081       10,411  
Other operating income
      33,744       30,116         13,373       17,883  
Proceeds from sale of MasterCard shares
      16,186               16,186        
Proceeds from redemption of Visa shares
      38,542                      
 
                           
Total non-interest income
    $ 247,675       183,834         107,698       96,330  
 
                           
Total non-interest income for the six months ended June 30, 2008 was $247.7 million, up 34.7%, from the same period in 2007. Excluding the $38.5 million gain on redemption of Visa shares, total non-interest income increased $25.3 million, or 13.8%, compared to same period a year ago. Total non-interest income for the three months ended June 30, 2008 was $107.7 million, up 11.8% compared to the same period in 2007.
Service charges on deposit accounts, the single largest component of fee income, were $54.5 million and $26.1 million, respectively, for the six and three months ended June 30, 2008, up 0.1% and down 7.1% from the same periods in 2007, respectively. Service charges on deposit

47


Table of Contents

accounts consist of non-sufficient funds (NSF) fees (which represent 63.4% and 60.2% of the total for the six and three months ended June 30, 2008), account analysis fees, and all other service charges.
NSF fees for the six and three months ended June 30, 2008 were $34.5 million and $15.7 million, down $3.1 million, or 8.4%, and $3.8 million, or 19.7% compared to the same periods in 2007. Account analysis fees were $11.5 million and $6.1 million for the six and three months ended June 30, 2008, respectively, and increased by $4.3 million, or 59.1%, and $2.4 million, or 66.5%, compared to the same periods in the prior year. The increase in account analysis fees was primarily due to lower earnings credits on commercial demand deposit accounts. All other service charges on deposit accounts, which consist primarily of monthly fees on retail demand deposit and saving accounts, were $8.5 million and $4.2 million for the six and three months ended June 30, 2008, respectively, down $1.1 million, or 11.4%, and $579 thousand, or 12.0%, compared to the same periods in 2007. The decline in all other service charges for the six and three months ended June 30, 2008 was largely due to a continued market emphasis of checking accounts with no monthly service charge and a decline on fees for check orders.
Financial management services revenues (which primarily consist of fiduciary and asset management fees, brokerage and investment banking revenue, and customer interest rate swap revenue which is included in other fee income) increased 13.1% to $51.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008, and increased 8.8% to $26.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008, as compared to the same periods in 2007. The financial management services revenue growth was led by increases in fees from customer interest rate swaps and brokerage and investment banking revenues.
Mortgage banking income decreased $1.1 million, or 7.2%, for the six months ended June 30, 2008, and decreased $2.0 million, or 26.1%, for the three months ended June 30, 2008 as compared to the same periods in 2007. The decline was primarily related to the decline in mortgage production, which declined $107.9 million, or 13.7% and $61.3 million, or 15.2%, for the six and three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same periods in the prior year. The results for the six months ended June 30, 2008 also included a $1.2 million increase in revenues due to the adoption of the SEC’s Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 109, “Written Loan Commitments Recorded at Fair Value Through Earnings.”
Other operating income increased $3.6 million, or 12.0%, and decreased $4.5 million, or 25.2%, for the six and three months ended June 30, 2008, as compared to the same periods in 2007, respectively. This increase included a $4.9 million gain in 2008 on increase in the fair value of private equity investments.
During the three months ended June 30, 2008, MasterCard conducted a conversion and sale program permitting the sale of a limited number of Class B shares, which are otherwise subject to restrictions on sale until 2010. Synovus recognized a gain of $16.2 million on the sale of a portion of its shares under the conversion and sale program.
Synovus recognized a pre-tax gain of $38.5 million on redemption of a portion of its membership interest in Visa, Inc. as a result of Visa’s initial public offering (the Visa IPO). The gain from the proceeds of the Visa IPO is reflected as a component of non-interest income for the six months ended June 30, 2008. For further discussion of Visa, see section titled “Non-Interest Expense” below.

48


Table of Contents

Non-Interest Expense
The following table summarizes non-interest expense for the six and three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007.
                                     
      Six months ended       Three months ended  
      June 30,       June 30,  
(In thousands)     2008     2007       2008     2007  
Salaries and other personnel expense
    $ 232,614       229,749         110,483       115,822  
Net occupancy and equipment expense
      61,340       54,860         31,130       27,572  
FDIC insurance and other regulatory fees
      12,250       4,698         6,172       2,315  
Impaired loans held for sale and other real estate costs
      31,502       1,150         23,621       577  
Goodwill impairment
      27,000               27,000        
Professional fees
      16,697       10,245         11,756       4,743  
Other operating expenses
      103,365       91,755         55,802       46,631  
Visa litigation expense
      (17,430 )                    
 
                           
Total non-interest expense
    $ 467,338       392,457         265,964       197,660  
 
                           
Non-interest expense increased by 19.1% and 34.6% for the six and three months ended June 30, 2008, compared to the same periods in the prior year. Excluding the reduction in the Visa litigation accrual and the charge for impairment of goodwill, non-interest expense increased by 16.6% and 20.9% for the six and three months ended June 30, 2008, respectively.
For the six and three months ended June 30, 2008, salaries and other personnel expenses increased by $2.9 million, or 1.2%, and decreased $5.3 million, or 4.6%, compared to the same periods in the prior year. The 2008 amounts reflect a reduction in accruals for performance-based pay. Total employees at June 30, 2008 were 7,275, down 56 compared to March 31, 2008, and down 26 compared to the prior year.
Net occupancy and equipment expense increased $6.5 million, or 11.8%, and $3.6 million, or 12.9%, for the six and three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same periods in the prior year. The increase in occupancy and equipment expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2008 include approximately $2.0 million in costs associated with the addition of new branch locations.
During 2007, the FDIC reinstituted the FDIC insurance assessment. In conjunction with the reinstituted assessment, the FDIC granted credits, which were fully utilized by early 2008. The increase in FDIC insurance and regulatory fees is substantially the result of expense recognized in 2008, following full recognition of credits, associated with the FDIC insurance assessment.
The increase in professional fees for both the six and three months ended June 30, 2008 include legal fees paid in connection with the FDIC investigation, which is discussed in Part II – Item 1: Legal Proceedings, and professional fees associated with Project Optimus, Synovus’ initiative to identify opportunities to increase revenues and reduce costs.
The increase in other operating expenses for the six and three months ended June 30, 2008 reflects the $2.4 million civil money penalty, discussed in Part II – Item 1: Legal Proceedings, and a $4.1 million provision for unfunded commitments. Synovus has historically assessed the

49


Table of Contents

loss exposure associated with unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit at each financial statement date. Previous assessments have resulted in inconsequential estimated loss exposure amounts. The negative credit migration that occurred during the second quarter of 2008 in certain credits resulted in an estimated loss exposure of $4.1 million.
During the second half of 2007, Synovus recognized litigation expenses of $36.8 million associated with indemnification obligations arising from Synovus’ ownership interest in Visa. During the six months ended June 30, 2008, Synovus reversed $17.4 million of the accrued litigation expense it recognized in the second half of 2007 as its proportionate share of the $3.0 billion escrow fund established by Visa to settle covered litigation out of the Visa IPO proceeds. For further discussion of Visa, see section titled “Non-Interest Income” above.
Income Tax Expense
Income tax expense was $53.0 million and $9.3 million based on income from continuing operations of $146.0 million and $21.4 million for the six and three months ended June 30, 2008. The effective income tax rate, which was impacted by non-deductible impairment of goodwill, was 36.3% for the six months ended June 30, 2008.
In the normal course of business, Synovus is subject to examinations from various tax authorities. These examinations may alter the timing or amount of taxable income or deductions or the allocation of income among tax jurisdictions. The total liability for uncertain tax positions under FIN 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes – an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” is $6.4 million and $6.9 million at June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Synovus is not able to reasonably estimate the amount by which the liability will increase or decrease over time; however, at this time, Synovus does not expect a significant payment related to these obligations within the next year.
Synovus continually monitors and evaluates the potential impact of current events and circumstances on the estimates and assumptions used in the analysis of its income tax positions, and, accordingly, Synovus’ effective tax rate may fluctuate in the future.
Dividends per Share
As a result of the TSYS spin-off, Synovus adjusted its cash dividend so that Synovus shareholders who retained their TSYS shares would initially receive, in the aggregate, the same cash dividends per share that were paid before the spin-off. As a result, Synovus adjusted its cash dividend per share for the six and three months ended June 30, 2008 to $0.3400 and $0.1700, respectively. Prior to the TSYS spin-off, Synovus paid a cash dividend for the six and three months ended June 30, 2007 of $0.4100 and $0.2050, respectively. The dividend payout ratio for the six months ended June 30, 2008 was 121.1%, as compared to 43.7% for the same period in 2007.
Management closely monitors trends and developments in credit quality, liquidity, financial markets and other economic trends, as well as regulatory requirements, all of which impact Synovus’ capital position, and will periodically review the dividend payout ratio to determine whether the payout ratio is appropriate in light of these factors.

50


Table of Contents

Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In December 31, 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141R, “Business Combinations.” SFAS No. 141R clarifies the definitions of both a business combination and a business. All business combinations will be accounted for under the acquisition method (previously referred to as the purchase method). This standard defines the acquisition date as the only relevant date for recognition and measurement of the fair value of consideration paid. SFAS No. 141R requires the acquirer to expense all acquisition related costs. SFAS No. 141R will also require acquired loans to be recorded net of the allowance for loan losses on the date of acquisition. SFAS No. 141R defines the measurement period as the time after the acquisition date during which the acquirer may make adjustments to the “provisional” amounts recognized at the acquisition date. This period cannot exceed one year, and any subsequent adjustments made to provisional amounts are done retrospectively and restate prior period data. The provisions of this statement are effective for business combinations during fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. Synovus is currently evaluating the impact that SFAS No. 141R will have on its financial position and results of operations and believes that such determination will not be meaningful until Synovus enters into a business combination.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements – An Amendment of ARB No. 51.” SFAS No. 160 requires non-controlling interests to be treated as a separate component of equity, not as a liability or other item outside of equity. Disclosure requirements include net income and comprehensive income to be displayed for both the controlling and noncontrolling interests and a separate schedule that shows the effects of any transactions with the noncontrolling interests on the equity attributable to the controlling interests. The provisions for this statement are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2008. This statement should be applied prospectively except for the presentation and disclosure requirements which shall be applied retrospectively for all periods presented. Synovus does not expect the impact of SFAS No. 160 on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows to be material.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities – An Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133.” SFAS No. 161 changes the disclosure requirements for derivative instruments and hedging activities. Disclosure requirements include qualitative disclosures about objectives and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about fair value amounts of and gains/losses on derivative instruments, and disclosures about credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative agreements. The provisions for this statement are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2009. The impact to Synovus will be additional disclosure in SEC filings.

51


Table of Contents

ITEM 3 — QUANTITATIVE AND
QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT
MARKET RISK
Interest rate risk is the primary market risk to which Synovus is potentially exposed. As of the end of the second quarter, the interest rate risk position of Synovus has changed modestly as compared to December 31, 2007. A further decline in short-term interest rates would be expected to have a modest negative impact on net interest income as implied rate floors are reached on lower cost core deposits. An expected increase in fixed rate asset prepayments would also negatively impact net interest income. This impact has been moderated somewhat by a significant amount of variable rate loans reaching a floor rate and effectively becoming fixed rate loans in a declining rate environment. A rising rate environment would be expected to have a moderately positive impact on net interest income. A rising rate environment would positively impact overall loan yields, as loan growth has been more concentrated in variable rate loans this year. Deposit rate repricing would be expected to lag somewhat in a rising rate environment and have a favorable impact on net interest income.
Synovus measures its sensitivity to changes in market interest rates through the use of a simulation model. Synovus uses this simulation model to determine a baseline net interest income forecast and the sensitivity of this forecast to changes in interest rates. These simulations include all of Synovus’ earning assets, liabilities, and derivative instruments. Forecasted balance sheet changes, primarily reflecting loan and deposit growth forecasts, are included in the periods modeled. Anticipated deposit mix changes in each interest rate scenario are also included in the periods modeled.
Synovus models its baseline net interest income forecast assuming an unchanged or flat interest rate environment. Synovus has modeled the impact of a gradual increase and decrease in short-term rates of 100 basis points to determine the sensitivity of net interest income for the next twelve months. The following table represents the estimated sensitivity of net interest income to these gradual changes in short term interest rates at June 30, 2008, with comparable information for December 31, 2007.
                 
    Estimated % Change in Net Interest Income
Change in Short-Term   as Compared to Unchanged Rates
Interest Rates   (for the next twelve months)
(in basis points)   June 30, 2008   December 31, 2007
+ 100
    1.2 %     (0.1 )%
- 100
    (2.2 )%     (1.5 )%
 
               
While these estimates are reflective of the general interest rate sensitivity of Synovus, local market conditions and their impact on loan and deposit pricing would be expected to have a significant impact on the realized level of net interest income. Actual realized balance sheet growth and mix would also impact the realized level of net interest income. Synovus also considers the interest rate sensitivity of non-interest income, primarily deposit account analysis fees, mortgage banking income, and financial management services income, in determining the appropriate net interest income sensitivity positioning.

52


Table of Contents

ITEM 4 – CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
We have evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report as required by Rule 13a-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer. Based on this evaluation, these officers have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting them to material information relating to Synovus (including its consolidated subsidiaries) required to be included in our periodic SEC filings. No change in Synovus’ internal control over financial reporting occurred during the period covered by this report that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

53


Table of Contents

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1 – LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Synovus and its subsidiaries are subject to various legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of its business. In the ordinary course of business, Synovus and its subsidiaries are also subject to regulatory examinations, information gathering requests, inquiries and investigations. Synovus establishes accruals for litigation and regulatory matters when those matters present loss contingencies that Synovus determines to be both probable and reasonably estimable. Based on current knowledge, advice of counsel and available insurance coverage, management does not believe that the eventual outcome of pending litigation and/or regulatory matters, including the regulatory matter described below, will have a material adverse effect on Synovus’ consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. However, in the event of unexpected future developments, it is possible that the ultimate resolution of these matters, if unfavorable, may be material to Synovus’ results of operations for any particular period.
As previously disclosed, the FDIC conducted an investigation of the policies, practices and procedures used by Columbus Bank and Trust Company (CB&T), a wholly owned banking subsidiary of Synovus Financial Corp. (Synovus), in connection with the credit card programs offered pursuant to its Affinity Agreement with CompuCredit Corporation (CompuCredit). CB&T issues credit cards that are marketed and serviced by CompuCredit pursuant to the Affinity Agreement. A provision of the Affinity Agreement generally requires CompuCredit to indemnify CB&T for losses incurred as a result of the failure of credit card programs offered pursuant to the Affinity Agreement to comply with applicable law. Synovus is subject to a per event 10% share of any such loss, but Synovus’ 10% payment obligation is limited to a cumulative total of $2 million for all losses incurred.
On June 9, 2008, the FDIC and CB&T entered into a settlement related to this investigation. CB&T did not admit or deny any alleged violations of law or regulations or any unsafe and unsound banking practices in connection with the settlement. As a part of the settlement, CB&T and the FDIC entered into a Cease and Desist Order and Order to Pay whereby CB&T agreed to: (1) pay a civil money penalty in the amount of $2.4 million; (2) institute certain changes to CB&T’s policies, practices and procedures in connection with credit card programs; (3) continue to implement its compliance plan to maintain a sound risk-based compliance management system and to modify them, if necessary, to comply with the Order; and (4) maintain its previously established Director Compliance Committee to oversee compliance with the Order. CB&T has paid the civil money penalty, and that payment is not subject to the indemnification provisions of the Affinity Agreement described above.
CB&T and the FDIC also entered into an Order for Restitution pursuant to which CB&T agreed to establish and maintain an account in the amount of $7.5 million to ensure the availability of restitution with respect to categories of consumers, specified by the FDIC, who activated Aspire credit card accounts issued pursuant to the Affinity Agreement on or before May 31, 2005. The FDIC may require the account to be applied under the following circumstances: (1) if CompuCredit is required by an order or other agreement with the FDIC or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), including an order or agreement issued or made pursuant to a settlement arrangement, to pay restitution to any consumers who activated their Aspire credit cards before May 31, 2005, and CompuCredit defaults, in whole or in part, on its obligation to make the required restitution, the FDIC may require the account to be applied to the extent of such default; or (2) if the FDIC and the FTC are unable to obtain an order or agreement requiring

54


Table of Contents

CompuCredit to pay restitution to any consumers who activated their Aspire credit cards before May 31, 2005, because of a reason other than the merits of their claims and despite making reasonable efforts to do so, the FDIC may require the account to be applied in full. This $7.5 million account represents a contingent liability of CB&T. At June 30, 2008, CB&T has not recorded a liability for this contingency. Any amounts paid from the restitution account are expected to be subject to the indemnification provisions of the Affinity Agreement described above. Synovus does not currently expect that the settlement will have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
On May 23, 2008, CompuCredit and its wholly owned subsidiary, CompuCredit Acquisition Corporation, sued CB&T and Synovus in the State Court of Fulton County, Georgia, alleging breach of contract with respect to the Affinity Agreement. CompuCredit seeks compensatory and general damages in an unspecified amount, a full accounting of the shares received by CB&T and Synovus in connection with the MasterCard and Visa initial public offerings and remittance of certain of those shares to CompuCredit, and the transfer of accounts under the Affinity Agreement to a third-party. CB&T and Synovus intend to vigorously defend themselves against these allegations. Based on current knowledge and advice of counsel, management does not believe that the eventual outcome of this case will have a material adverse effect on Synovus’ consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. It is possible, however, that in the event of unexpected future developments the ultimate resolution of this matter, if unfavorable, may be material to Synovus’ results of operations for any particular period.

55


Table of Contents

ITEM 1A – RISK FACTORS
In addition to the other information set forth in this Report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I under the caption “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, which could materially affect our business, financial position, results of operations or cash flows or future results. The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks facing Synovus. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial position, results of operations or cash flows or future results.
Other than the risk factors set forth below, there were no material changes during the period covered by this Report to the risk factors previously disclosed in the Synovus’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.
The current and further deterioration in the residential construction and commercial development real estate markets may lead to increased non-performing assets in our loan portfolio and increased provision expense for losses on loans, which could have a material adverse effect on our capital, financial condition and results of operations.
Since the third quarter of 2007, the residential construction and commercial development real estate markets have experienced a variety of difficulties and changed economic conditions. In particular, market conditions in the Atlanta and the West Coast of Florida markets, which combined represent 66% of non-performing assets at June 30, 2008, have experienced continued declines in credit quality since the end of 2007. Synovus’ non-performing assets were $830.3 million at June 30, 2008, compared to $443.6 million at December 31, 2007. Non-performing assets in the Atlanta area and West Coast of Florida markets represented 48% and 18%, respectively, of Synovus’ total non-performing assets at June 30, 2008. If market conditions continue to deteriorate, they may lead to additional valuation adjustments on our loan portfolios and real estate owned as we continue to reassess the market value of our loan portfolio, the loss severities of loans in default, and the net realizable value of real estate owned. Poor economic conditions could result in decreased demand for residential housing, which, in turn, could adversely affect the development and construction efforts of residential real estate developers. Consequently, such economic downturns could adversely affect the ability of such residential real estate developer borrowers to repay these loans and the value of property used as collateral for such loans. While Synovus believes that the severity of market conditions in the Atlanta and West Coast of Florida markets are related to factors which are specific to those individual markets, management continually monitors market conditions and economic factors throughout Synovus’ footprint for indications of change in other markets. Any further increase in our non-performing assets and related increases in our provision expense for losses on loans could negatively affect our business and could have a material adverse effect on our capital, financial condition and results of operations.
Our allowance for loan losses may not be adequate to cover actual losses, and we may be required to materially increase our allowance, which may adversely affect our capital, financial condition and results of operations.
We maintain an allowance for loan losses, which is a reserve established through a provision for loan losses charged to expense, which represents management’s best estimate of probable credit losses that have been incurred within the existing portfolio of loans, all as described under “Item

56


Table of Contents

2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Critical Accounting Policies – Allowance for Loan Losses.” The allowance, in the judgment of management, is necessary to reserve for estimated loan losses and risks inherent in the loan portfolio. The determination of the appropriate level of the allowance for loan losses inherently involves a high degree of subjectivity and requires us to make significant estimates of current credit risks using existing qualitative and quantitative information, all of which may undergo material changes. Changes in economic conditions affecting borrowers, new information regarding existing loans, identification of additional problem loans, and other factors, both within and outside of our control, may require an increase in the allowance for loan losses. In addition, bank regulatory agencies periodically review our allowance for loan losses and may require an increase in the provision for loan losses or the recognition of additional loan charge offs, based on judgments different than those of management. An increase in the allowance for loan losses results in a decrease in net income, and possibly risk-based capital, and may have a material adverse effect on our capital, financial condition and results of operations.
Synovus’ net interest income could be negatively affected by the lower level of short-term interest rates, recent developments in the credit and real estate markets and competition in our primary market area.
Net interest income, which is the difference between the interest income that we earn on interest-earning assets and the interest expense that we pay on interest-bearing liabilities, is a major component of our income. Our income is in turn our primary source of funding for our operations, including extending credit and reserving for loan losses. The Federal Reserve reduced interest rates on three occasions in 2007 by a total of 100 basis points, to 4.25%, and by another 225 basis points, to 2.00%, during the first four months of 2008. A significant portion of our loans, including residential construction and development loans and other commercial loans, bear interest at variable rates. The interest rates on these loans decrease when the Federal Reserve reduces interest rates, which may reduce our net interest income. In addition, in order to compete for deposits in our primary market areas, we may offer more attractive interest rates to depositors, and we may increasingly rely on out-of-market or brokered deposits as a source of liquidity.
Increased credit costs and the decrease in interest rates reduced our net interest income during the first six months of 2008 and could cause additional pressure on net interest income in future periods. This reduction in net interest income may also be exacerbated by the high level of competition that we face in our primary market area. Any significant reduction in our net interest income could negatively affect our business and could have a material adverse impact on our capital, financial condition and results of operations.

57


Table of Contents

ITEM 2 – UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY
SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
In prior periods, Synovus received previously owned shares of its common stock in payment of the exercise price of stock options and shares withheld to cover taxes on vesting for non-vested shares granted. No shares of Synovus common stock were delivered during the three months ended June 30, 2008.

58


Table of Contents

ITEM 4 – SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
The annual shareholders’ meeting was held on April 24, 2008. Following is a summary of the proposals that were submitted to the shareholders for approval and a tabulation of the votes with respect to each proposal.
Proposal I
The proposal was to elect nineteen directors of Synovus to serve until the 2009 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
                 
Nominee   Votes For   Withheld Authority to Vote
 
Daniel P. Amos
    2,715,097,418       31,136,914  
Richard E. Anthony
    2,712,382,683       33,851,649  
James H. Blanchard
    2,708,055,173       38,179,159  
Richard Y. Bradley
    2,615,162,411       131,071,921  
Frank W. Brumley
    2,714,679,132       31,555,200  
Elizabeth W. Camp
    2,718,859,561       27,374,771  
Gardiner W. Garrard, Jr.
    2,677,916,304       68,318,028  
T. Michael Goodrich
    2,717,176,836       29,057,496  
Frederick L. Green, III
    2,712,878,843       33,355,489  
V. Nathaniel Hansford
    2,712,601,676       33,632,656  
Alfred W. Jones, III (1)
    2,708,212,796       38,021,536  
Mason H. Lampton
    2,714,456,076       31,778,256  
Elizabeth C. Ogie
    2,711,057,152       35,177,180  
H. Lynn Page
    2,713,665,168       32,569,164  
J. Neal Purcell
    2,718,125,486       28,108,846  
Melvin T. Stith
    2,718,531,260       27,703,072  
Philip W. Tomlinson
    2,708,529,248       37,705,084  
William B. Turner, Jr.
    2,687,859,679       58,374,653  
James D. Yancey
    2,708,817,099       37,417,233  
 
 
(1)   Alfred W. Jones, III resigned from Synovus’ board of directors effective July 7, 2008.
Proposal II
The proposal was to ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as the independent auditor to audit the consolidated financial statements of Synovus and its subsidiaries for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008.
                         
    For   Against   Abstain
 
Votes
    2,717,676,955       23,926,119       4,631,257  
 

59


Table of Contents

ITEM 6 — EXHIBITS
     
(a) Exhibits   Description
 
3.1
  Articles of Incorporation of Synovus, as amended, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of Synovus’ Quarterly Report on Form 10- Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the SEC on May 10, 2006
 
   
3.2
  Bylaws, as amended, of Synovus, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of Synovus’ Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 24, 2008, filed with the SEC on July 28, 2008
 
   
10.1
  Form of Change of Control Agreements for executive officers
 
   
10.2
  Amended and Restated Synovus Financial Corp. Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan
 
   
10.3
  Second Amended and Restated Synovus Financial Corp. Deferred Compensation Plan
 
   
31.1
  Certification of Chief Executive Officer
 
   
31.2
  Certification of Chief Financial Officer
 
   
32
  Certification of Periodic Report

60


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
         
  SYNOVUS FINANCIAL CORP.
 
 
Date: August 08, 2008  BY:   /s/ Thomas J. Prescott    
    Thomas J. Prescott   
    Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer 
 
 

61


Table of Contents

INDEX TO EXHIBITS
     
Exhibit Number   Description
 
3.1
  Articles of Incorporation of Synovus, as amended, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of Synovus’ Quarterly Report on Form 10- Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the SEC on May 10, 2006
 
   
3.2
  Bylaws, as amended, of Synovus, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of Synovus’ Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 24, 2008, filed with the SEC on July 28, 2008
 
   
10.1
  Form of Change of Control Agreements for executive officers
 
   
10.2
  Amended and Restated Synovus Financial Corp. Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan
 
   
10.3
  Second Amended and Restated Synovus Financial Corp. Deferred Compensation Plan
 
   
31.1
  Certification of Chief Executive Officer
 
   
31.2
  Certification of Chief Financial Officer
 
   
32
  Certification of Periodic Report

62