e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC
20549-1004
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008
|
OR
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to
|
Commission file number 1-43
GENERAL MOTORS
CORPORATION
(Exact Name of Registrant as
Specified in its Charter)
|
|
|
|
|
|
STATE OF DELAWARE
(State or other jurisdiction
of
Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
38-0572515
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
300 Renaissance Center, Detroit, Michigan
(Address of Principal
Executive Offices)
|
|
48265-3000
(Zip
Code)
|
(313) 556-5000
Registrants telephone number, including area code
NA
(former name, former address and former fiscal year, if
changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated
filer. See definition of large accelerated filer,
accelerated filer and smaller reporting
company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated
filer þ
|
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
(Do not check if smaller reporting company)
|
|
Smaller reporting
company o
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
As of October 31, 2008, the number of shares outstanding of
the Registrants common stock was 610,463,321 shares.
Website
Access to Companys Reports
General Motors Corporations internet website address is
www.gm.com. Our annual reports on
Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q,
current reports on
Form 8-K,
and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act are available
free of charge through our website as soon as reasonably
practicable after they are electronically filed with, or
furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission.
GENERAL
MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX
PART I
Item 1. Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Net sales and revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automotive sales
|
|
$
|
37,503
|
|
|
$
|
43,002
|
|
|
$
|
117,120
|
|
|
$
|
131,076
|
|
Financial services and insurance revenue
|
|
|
438
|
|
|
|
700
|
|
|
|
1,466
|
|
|
|
2,530
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales and revenue
|
|
|
37,941
|
|
|
|
43,702
|
|
|
|
118,586
|
|
|
|
133,606
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automotive cost of sales
|
|
|
34,521
|
|
|
|
41,373
|
|
|
|
116,219
|
|
|
|
121,768
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expense
|
|
|
3,251
|
|
|
|
3,601
|
|
|
|
10,704
|
|
|
|
10,205
|
|
Financial services and insurance expense
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
640
|
|
|
|
1,475
|
|
|
|
2,334
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
652
|
|
|
|
350
|
|
|
|
4,136
|
|
|
|
925
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
38,824
|
|
|
|
45,964
|
|
|
|
132,534
|
|
|
|
135,232
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(883
|
)
|
|
|
(2,262
|
)
|
|
|
(13,948
|
)
|
|
|
(1,626
|
)
|
Equity in loss of GMAC LLC (Note 6)
|
|
|
(1,235
|
)
|
|
|
(809
|
)
|
|
|
(4,777
|
)
|
|
|
(874
|
)
|
Automotive and other interest expense
|
|
|
(542
|
)
|
|
|
(839
|
)
|
|
|
(2,037
|
)
|
|
|
(2,319
|
)
|
Automotive interest income and other non-operating income, net
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
572
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
1,775
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes, equity
income and minority interests
|
|
|
(2,582
|
)
|
|
|
(3,338
|
)
|
|
|
(20,597
|
)
|
|
|
(3,044
|
)
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
39,186
|
|
|
|
1,029
|
|
|
|
38,805
|
|
Equity income, net of tax
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
310
|
|
|
|
440
|
|
Minority interests, net of tax
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
(102
|
)
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
(361
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations
|
|
|
(2,542
|
)
|
|
|
(42,512
|
)
|
|
|
(21,264
|
)
|
|
|
(41,770
|
)
|
Discontinued operations (Note 3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
256
|
|
Gain on sale of discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,504
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,504
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,549
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,760
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(2,542
|
)
|
|
$
|
(38,963
|
)
|
|
$
|
(21,264
|
)
|
|
$
|
(38,010
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share, basic and diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(4.45
|
)
|
|
$
|
(75.12
|
)
|
|
$
|
(37.44
|
)
|
|
$
|
(73.82
|
)
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(4.45
|
)
|
|
$
|
(68.85
|
)
|
|
$
|
(37.44
|
)
|
|
$
|
(67.18
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding, basic and diluted
(millions)
|
|
|
571
|
|
|
|
566
|
|
|
|
568
|
|
|
|
566
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends per share
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
|
$
|
0.50
|
|
|
$
|
0.75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reference should be made to the notes to the condensed
consolidated financial statements.
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
15,831
|
|
|
$
|
24,549
|
|
|
$
|
24,402
|
|
Marketable securities
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
2,139
|
|
|
|
1,978
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash and marketable securities
|
|
|
15,898
|
|
|
|
26,688
|
|
|
|
26,380
|
|
Accounts and notes receivable, net
|
|
|
9,461
|
|
|
|
9,659
|
|
|
|
10,728
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
16,914
|
|
|
|
14,939
|
|
|
|
15,530
|
|
Equipment on operating leases, net
|
|
|
4,312
|
|
|
|
5,283
|
|
|
|
5,572
|
|
Other current assets and deferred income taxes
|
|
|
3,511
|
|
|
|
3,566
|
|
|
|
3,170
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
50,096
|
|
|
|
60,135
|
|
|
|
61,380
|
|
Financing and Insurance Operations Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
268
|
|
|
|
328
|
|
Investments in securities
|
|
|
273
|
|
|
|
215
|
|
|
|
209
|
|
Equipment on operating leases, net
|
|
|
2,892
|
|
|
|
6,712
|
|
|
|
7,856
|
|
Equity in net assets of GMAC LLC
|
|
|
1,949
|
|
|
|
7,079
|
|
|
|
6,852
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
2,034
|
|
|
|
2,715
|
|
|
|
3,910
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Financing and Insurance Operations assets
|
|
|
7,324
|
|
|
|
16,989
|
|
|
|
19,155
|
|
Non-Current Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in and advances to nonconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
2,351
|
|
|
|
1,919
|
|
|
|
2,031
|
|
Property, net
|
|
|
42,156
|
|
|
|
43,017
|
|
|
|
42,264
|
|
Goodwill and intangible assets, net
|
|
|
949
|
|
|
|
1,066
|
|
|
|
1,084
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
907
|
|
|
|
2,116
|
|
|
|
975
|
|
Prepaid pension
|
|
|
3,602
|
|
|
|
20,175
|
|
|
|
18,920
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
3,040
|
|
|
|
3,466
|
|
|
|
3,691
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current assets
|
|
|
53,005
|
|
|
|
71,759
|
|
|
|
68,965
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$
|
110,425
|
|
|
$
|
148,883
|
|
|
$
|
149,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS DEFICIT
|
Current Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable (principally trade)
|
|
$
|
27,839
|
|
|
$
|
29,439
|
|
|
$
|
30,514
|
|
Short-term borrowings and current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
7,208
|
|
|
|
6,047
|
|
|
|
5,263
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
33,959
|
|
|
|
34,822
|
|
|
|
33,927
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
69,006
|
|
|
|
70,308
|
|
|
|
69,704
|
|
Financing and Insurance Operations Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
1,890
|
|
|
|
4,908
|
|
|
|
5,962
|
|
Other liabilities and deferred income taxes
|
|
|
768
|
|
|
|
905
|
|
|
|
1,666
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Financing and Insurance Operations liabilities
|
|
|
2,658
|
|
|
|
5,813
|
|
|
|
7,628
|
|
Non-Current Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
36,057
|
|
|
|
33,384
|
|
|
|
34,670
|
|
Postretirement benefits other than pensions
|
|
|
33,714
|
|
|
|
47,375
|
|
|
|
48,336
|
|
Pensions
|
|
|
11,500
|
|
|
|
11,381
|
|
|
|
12,214
|
|
Other liabilities and deferred income taxes
|
|
|
16,484
|
|
|
|
16,102
|
|
|
|
17,019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current liabilities
|
|
|
97,755
|
|
|
|
108,242
|
|
|
|
112,239
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
169,419
|
|
|
|
184,363
|
|
|
|
189,571
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
945
|
|
|
|
1,614
|
|
|
|
1,700
|
|
Stockholders Deficit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, no par value, 6,000,000 shares authorized,
no shares issued and outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock,
$12/3
par value (2,000,000,000 shares authorized, 800,937,541 and
610,462,606 shares issued and outstanding at
September 30, 2008, respectively, 756,637,541 and
566,059,249 shares issued and outstanding at
December 31, 2007, respectively, and 756,637,541 and
565,877,391 shares issued and outstanding at
September 30, 2007, respectively)
|
|
|
1,017
|
|
|
|
943
|
|
|
|
943
|
|
Capital surplus (principally additional paid-in capital)
|
|
|
15,732
|
|
|
|
15,319
|
|
|
|
15,264
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(61,014
|
)
|
|
|
(39,392
|
)
|
|
|
(38,528
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(15,674
|
)
|
|
|
(13,964
|
)
|
|
|
(19,450
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders deficit
|
|
|
(59,939
|
)
|
|
|
(37,094
|
)
|
|
|
(41,771
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities, Minority Interests and Stockholders
Deficit
|
|
$
|
110,425
|
|
|
$
|
148,883
|
|
|
$
|
149,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reference should be made to the notes to the condensed
consolidated financial statements.
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
(Accumulated
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Stockholders
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Surplus
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
Deficit)
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
566
|
|
|
$
|
943
|
|
|
$
|
15,336
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
195
|
|
|
$
|
(22,126
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,652
|
)
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(38,010
|
)
|
|
|
(38,010
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38,010
|
)
|
Other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
563
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain on derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized loss on securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined benefit plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net prior service costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
212
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net actuarial gain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
673
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net transition asset / obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,523
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,523
|
|
|
|
1,523
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(36,487
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effects of accounting change regarding pension plan and OPEB
measurement-dates pursuant to SFAS No. 158, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(425
|
)
|
|
|
1,153
|
|
|
|
728
|
|
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting
principle adoption of FIN No. 48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
Stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
Cash dividends paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(425
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(425
|
)
|
Purchase of convertible note hedge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(99
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(99
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2007
|
|
|
566
|
|
|
$
|
943
|
|
|
$
|
15,264
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(38,528
|
)
|
|
$
|
(19,450
|
)
|
|
$
|
(41,771
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
566
|
|
|
$
|
943
|
|
|
$
|
15,319
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(39,392
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13,964
|
)
|
|
$
|
(37,094
|
)
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(21,264
|
)
|
|
|
(21,264
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,264
|
)
|
Other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(388
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized loss on derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(570
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized loss on securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(311
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined benefit plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net prior service costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,480
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net actuarial gain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,035
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net transition asset / obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,710
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,710
|
)
|
|
|
(1,710
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(22,974
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effects of GMAC LLC adoption of SFAS No. 157 and
No. 159 (Note 6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(76
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(76
|
)
|
Stock options and other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Common stock issued for settlement of Series D debentures
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
478
|
|
Cash dividends paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(283
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(283
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2008
|
|
|
610
|
|
|
$
|
1,017
|
|
|
$
|
15,732
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(61,014
|
)
|
|
$
|
(15,674
|
)
|
|
$
|
(59,939
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reference should be made to the notes to the condensed
consolidated financial statements.
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) continuing operating
activities
|
|
$
|
(9,661
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,641
|
|
Cash provided by discontinued operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
221
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
(9,661
|
)
|
|
|
3,862
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenditures for property
|
|
|
(5,527
|
)
|
|
|
(4,939
|
)
|
Investments in marketable securities, acquisitions
|
|
|
(3,209
|
)
|
|
|
(8,672
|
)
|
Investments in marketable securities, liquidations
|
|
|
5,139
|
|
|
|
6,801
|
|
Capital contribution to GMAC LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,022
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of business units/equity investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,354
|
|
Operating leases, liquidations
|
|
|
3,014
|
|
|
|
2,463
|
|
Other
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in continuing investing activities
|
|
|
(555
|
)
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
Cash used in discontinued investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(555
|
)
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
Cash flows from financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in short-term borrowings
|
|
|
(2,730
|
)
|
|
|
(3,732
|
)
|
Borrowings of long-term debt
|
|
|
5,581
|
|
|
|
1,919
|
|
Payments made on long-term debt
|
|
|
(847
|
)
|
|
|
(1,244
|
)
|
Cash dividends paid to stockholders
|
|
|
(283
|
)
|
|
|
(425
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) continuing financing
activities
|
|
|
1,721
|
|
|
|
(3,482
|
)
|
Cash used in discontinued financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
1,721
|
|
|
|
(3,487
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(315
|
)
|
|
|
292
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(8,810
|
)
|
|
|
607
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period
|
|
|
24,817
|
|
|
|
24,123
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period
|
|
$
|
16,007
|
|
|
$
|
24,730
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reference should be made to the notes to the condensed
consolidated financial statements.
4
GENERAL
MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Nature
of Operations
We (also General Motors Corporation, GM, the Corporation, our or
us) are primarily engaged in the worldwide production and
marketing of cars and trucks. We operate in two businesses
consisting of Automotive (GM Automotive or GMA) and Financing
and Insurance Operations (FIO). We develop, manufacture and
market vehicles worldwide through our four automotive segments
which consist of GM North America (GMNA), GM Europe (GME), GM
Latin America/Africa/Mid-East (GMLAAM) and GM Asia Pacific
(GMAP). Our finance and insurance operations are primarily
conducted through our 49% equity interest in GMAC LLC (GMAC),
which is accounted for under the equity method of accounting.
GMAC provides a broad range of financial services, including
consumer vehicle financing, automotive dealership and other
commercial financing, residential mortgage services, automobile
service contracts, personal automobile insurance coverage and
selected commercial insurance coverage.
Note 2. Basis
of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and
regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC) for interim financial information. Accordingly,
they do not include all of the information and footnotes
required by United States generally accepted accounting
principles (GAAP) for complete financial statements. In our
opinion, these condensed consolidated financial statements
include all adjustments, consisting of only normal recurring
items, considered necessary for a fair presentation of our
financial position and results of operations. The operating
results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of
results that may be expected for any other interim period or for
the full year. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated
financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2007 (2007
10-K) as
filed with the SEC.
The condensed consolidated financial statements include our
accounts and those of our subsidiaries that we control due to
ownership of a majority voting interest. In addition, we
consolidate variable interest entities for which we are the
primary beneficiary. Our share of earnings or losses of
nonconsolidated affiliates are included in our consolidated
operating results using the equity method of accounting when we
are able to exercise significant influence over the operating
and financial decisions of the affiliate. We use the cost method
of accounting if we are not able to exercise significant
influence over the operating and financial decisions of the
affiliate. All intercompany balances and transactions have been
eliminated in consolidation.
We have had significant losses from 2005 through the nine months
ended September 30, 2008, attributable to operations and to
restructurings and other charges such as support for Delphi and
future cost cutting measures. We have managed our liquidity
during this time through a series of cost reduction initiatives,
capital markets transactions and sales of assets. However, the
global credit market crisis has had a dramatic effect on our
industry. In the three months ended September 30, 2008, the
turmoil in the mortgage and overall credit markets, continued
reductions in U.S. housing values, historically high prices for
energy, the high likelihood that the United States and Western
Europe have entered into a recession and the slowdown of
economic growth in the rest of the world, created a
substantially more difficult business environment. Vehicle sales
in North America and Western Europe contracted severely and the
pace of vehicle sales in the rest of the world slowed. Our
liquidity position, as well as our operating performance, were
negatively affected by these economic and industry conditions
and by other financial business factors, many of which are
beyond our control. These conditions have generally worsened
during October 2008, with sales of vehicles for the U.S.
industry falling to 861,000 units, or a seasonally adjusted rate
of 10.9 million units, which was the lowest level for
October since 1982. We do not believe it is likely that these
adverse economic conditions, and their effect on the automotive
industry, will improve significantly in the near term,
notwithstanding the unprecedented intervention by the U.S. and
other governments in the global banking and financial systems.
5
GENERAL
MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
In the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we used
$9.7 billion of cash in operations and our liquidity
position deteriorated by $11.1 billion. Our cash flow
deteriorated primarily due to our significant operating loss,
increases in inventory balances of $2.0 billion and a
decrease in accounts payable and accruals of $2.5 billion.
We have taken far reaching actions to restructure our U.S.
business, but the effect of current global economic and credit
market conditions on the automotive industry require that we
obtain additional near-term liquidity support. Based on our
estimated cash requirements through December 31, 2009, we
do not expect our operations to generate sufficient cash flow to
fund our obligations as they come due, and we do not currently
have other traditional sources of liquidity available to fund
these obligations.
On July 15, 2008, we announced a plan for a combination of
operating and related initiatives, as well as asset sales and
capital market activities, both to conserve cash and to generate
incremental cash flows in a total amount of up to
$15 billion. Reflecting the priority of addressing
liquidity in the current financial environment, we announced
additional operating changes on November 7, 2008. We expect
these additional actions to provide an incremental
$5 billion of cash savings through December 31, 2009,
which combined with the previous initiatives announced on
July 15, 2008, would conserve or generate cash of up to
$20 billion. These various initiatives are described below,
and many of them, particularly asset sales and capital market
activities, will be very challenging given the current business
and credit market environments. Moreover, the full impact of
many of these actions will not be realized until the second half
of 2009 or later, even if they are implemented successfully. Our
plans also assume that we will not be required to provide
additional financial support to Delphi or GMAC beyond the level
previously agreed to and that our trade suppliers will continue
to conduct business with us on terms consistent with historical
practice.
Based on our most recently available information (updated after
the Form 8-K filed on November 7, 2008), even if we implement
the planned operating actions that are substantially within our
control, our estimated liquidity during the remainder of 2008
will be at or near the minimum amount necessary to operate our
business. Looking into the first two quarters of 2009, even with
our planned actions, our estimated liquidity will fall
significantly short of the minimum required to operate our
business unless economic and automotive industry conditions
significantly improve, we receive substantial proceeds from
asset sales, we take more aggressive working capital
initiatives, we gain access to capital markets and other private
sources of funding, we receive government funding under one or
more current or future programs, or some combination of the
foregoing. We are actively pursuing all of these possible
sources of funding, but there can be no assurance that they will
supply funds in amounts and timing sufficient to meet our
liquidity requirements in the first two quarters of 2009 and
perhaps in later periods.
Our financial statements have been prepared on a going concern
basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the
satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business.
Our ability to continue as a going concern is substantially
dependent on the successful execution of many of the actions
referred to above, on the timeline contemplated by our plan. Our
interim condensed financial statements do not include any
adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of
recorded asset amounts nor to the amounts and classification of
liabilities that may be necessary should we be unable to
continue as a going concern.
|
|
|
Management
Actions and Plans
|
From 2005 through 2007, we took a number of steps to restructure
our North American operations for sustainable profitability.
These included reducing structural costs by $9 billion per
year, with plans to eliminate additional annual structural costs
by 2011. In addition, we reached a historic agreement with the
UAW in 2007 that provided the basis for a fully competitive
manufacturing base in the United States by 2010. The UAW
agreement also provided for the funding of retiree health care
obligations by an independent VEBA trust, commencing in 2010. We
also modified our salaried employee and executive pension plans
and health care coverage to reduce our unfunded liability and
made significant reductions in North American manufacturing
capacity and headcount.
6
GENERAL
MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
During the period from 2005 to 2007, the U.S. total vehicle
market ranged from 16.5 million to 17.5 million units
per year, and as recently as May 2008, our operating plans were
based on a market assumption of more than 15.5 million
units in 2008 in the United States, which was in line with
industry analysts consensus at that time. As global
economic conditions deteriorated during 2008, we revised the
assumptions underlying our operating plans and recognized that
additional actions would be needed to position our operations
for the continuing decline in new vehicle sales. A decline in
vehicle sales and production results in outflows of cash greater
than collections of accounts receivables, which has a negative
impact on our working capital. This working capital impact has
the effect of reducing our operating cash flow at a higher rate
than the decline in vehicle unit volume.
On July 15, 2008, we announced new planning assumptions
based on a U.S. total vehicle market of 14.3 million units
in 2008 and 2009, which was at or below industry analysts
consensus, and a U.S. market share of 21% in those years.
Accordingly, we undertook a number of initiatives aimed at
conserving or generating approximately $15.0 billion of
cash on an incremental basis through the end of 2009. These
initiatives included approximately $10 billion of operating
actions that are substantially within our control, including
structural cost reductions, reducing capital spending, improving
working capital, reaching agreement to defer approximately
$1.7 billion of scheduled payments to the UAW VEBA, and
eliminating the dividend paid on our common stock. Further
information about these actions follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Salaried employment savings (estimated $1.5 billion
effect) We are executing salaried headcount
reductions in the U.S. and Canada through normal attrition,
early retirements, mutual separation programs and other tools.
In September 2008, we extended voluntary early retirement offers
under our Salaried Retirement Window Program (Salaried Window
Program) to certain of our U.S. salaried employees. Employees
accepting the Salaried Retirement Window Program were required
to do so no later than October 24, 2008, with the majority
of retirements taking place on November 1, 2008. As of
October 31, 2008, 3,460 employees had irrevocably accepted
the Salaried Retirement Window Program, which was in excess of
the 3,000 needed to achieve our financial target. In addition,
health care coverage for U.S. salaried retirees over 65 has been
eliminated, effective January 1, 2009. Furthermore, there
will be no new base compensation increases for U.S. and Canadian
salaried employees for the remainder of 2008 and 2009. We are
also eliminating discretionary cash bonuses for the executive
group in 2008.
|
|
|
GMNA structural cost reductions (estimated $2.5 billion
effect) Significant progress has been made
towards achieving GMNAs structural cost reduction target.
We have accelerated cessation of production at two assembly
facilities in addition to shift and line-rate reductions at
other facilities. Truck capacity is expected to be reduced by
300,000 vehicles by the end of 2009. Promotional and advertising
spending is being reduced by 25% and 20%, respectively, and
engineering spending is being curtailed as well. In addition, we
are implementing significant reductions in discretionary
spending (e.g., travel, non-core information technology projects
and consulting services).
|
|
|
Capital expenditure reductions (estimated $1.5 billion
effect) The major components of this reduction
are related to a delay in the next generation large
pick-up
truck and sport utility vehicle programs, as well as V-8 engine
development. There will also be reductions in non-product
capital spending. These reductions will be partially offset by
increases in powertrain spending related to alternative
propulsion, small displacement engines and fuel economy
technologies.
|
|
|
Working capital improvements (estimated $2.0 billion
effect) Actions are being taken to improve
working capital by approximately $1.5 billion in North
America and $0.5 billion in Europe by December 31,
2009, primarily by reducing raw material,
work-in-progress
and finished goods inventory levels as well as implementing lean
inventory practices at parts warehouses. All these initiatives
are on track for completion prior to December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
UAW VEBA payment deferrals (estimated $1.7 billion
effect) Approximately $1.7 billion of
payments that had been scheduled to be made to a temporary asset
account in 2008 and 2009 for the establishment of the New VEBA
has been deferred until 2010. The outstanding payable resulting
from this deferral will accrue interest at 9% per annum. The UAW
and Class Counsel have agreed that this deferral will not
constitute a change in or breach of the Settlement Agreement.
Within 20 business days of the Implementation Date,
approximately $7.0 billion of deferred payments, plus
interest plus additional contractual amounts will be due to the
New VEBA.
|
7
GENERAL
MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend suspension (estimated $0.8 billion
effect) Our Board of Directors has suspended
dividends on our common stock.
|
The remaining $5 billion of our July liquidity plan
included $2 billion to $4 billion of planned asset
sales and $2 billion to $3 billion of fundraising in
capital markets. We believed that these actions, together with
the availability of $4.5 billion under our secured credit
line, would provide sufficient liquidity for the balance of 2008
and 2009 as well. The status of these previously-announced
activities as of November 7, 2008, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Asset sales We are exploring the sale of the
HUMMER business, Strasbourg transmission plant and the AC Delco
business. We expect to shortly commence providing offering
materials to potential buyers for the HUMMER and AC Delco
businesses pursuant to appropriate confidentiality agreements
and have already commenced providing confidential offering
materials for the Strasbourg transmission plant to interested
parties. We are also in the process of monetizing idle or excess
real estate and several individual transactions are in various
stages of execution.
|
|
|
Capital market activities Our plan targeted
at least $2.0 billion to $3.0 billion of financing
during 2008 and 2009. However, due to the prevailing global
economic conditions and our current financial condition and
near-term outlook, we currently do not have access to the
capital markets on acceptable terms. In the three months ended
September 30, 2008, we executed $0.5 billion of
debt-for-equity
exchanges of our Series D convertible bonds due in June
2009. In addition, we have gross unencumbered assets of over
$20 billion, which could support a secured debt offering,
or multiple offerings, in excess of the initially targeted
$2.0 billion to $3.0 billion, if market conditions
recover. These assets include stock of foreign subsidiaries,
brands, our investment in GMAC and real estate.
|
|
|
|
November
2008 Initiatives
|
Since July, U.S. auto industry sales have continued to erode,
with light vehicle sales declining to a seasonally adjusted
annual rate of 10.9 million units in October 2008. In
addition to the general economic factors discussed above,
conditions in the credit markets caused GMAC, like many other
lenders, to suspend or severely curtail lease financing and
tighten credit standards for traditional retail financing, with
the result that consumers find it more difficult to finance
purchases of new vehicles. GMAC and other lenders also
increasingly restricted dealer financing. In light of the
continued deterioration of industry vehicle sales and generally
worsening economic conditions, we are now basing our operating
plans on what we believe to be a conservative assumption of a
14.0 million unit U.S. total vehicle market in 2008 and
12.0 million for 2009, and we have concluded that our July
2008 initiatives will not be sufficient to ensure adequate
liquidity through 2009 without further actions being taken.
As noted above, one consequence of the global economic downturn
and credit crisis has been that capital markets have for all
practical purposes been closed to GM for purposes of
implementing the $2 billion to $3 billion of
fundraising that was included in our July plan to bolster our
liquidity during the remainder of 2008 and the first half of
2009. We explored a number of potential transactions to issue
significant debt or equity capital during the three months ended
September 30, 2008, but were unable to do so on acceptable
terms. In the three months ended September 30, 2008, we
exchanged $0.5 billion of principal amount of our
outstanding Series D convertible bonds due in June 2009 for
newly issued GM common stock. As it is unlikely we will be able
to execute an additional capital markets transaction in the near
term, our ability to meet our liquidity needs relies on our
ability to successfully implement other initiatives in our
liquidity plans. The global credit market further deteriorated
in September with the failures of several large financial
institutions and the merger of others. Accordingly, on
September 24, 2008, in order to have certainty of access to
funding, we drew down the remaining $3.4 billion of funding
available under our secured revolving credit facility. We had
previously drawn $1.0 billion on August 1, 2008 to
assist in meeting our seasonal working capital needs.
Reflecting the priority of addressing liquidity, we announced
additional operating changes and other actions on
November 7, 2008. Taken together, we expect these actions
to provide an incremental $5.0 billion of cash savings
through December 31,
8
GENERAL
MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
2009, which combined with previous initiatives announced on
July 15, 2008, would conserve or generate cash of up to
$20.0 billion. These additional actions include:
|
|
|
|
|
Salaried employment savings (estimated $0.5 billion
effect) Additional salaried employment savings
will be achieved through incremental workforce reductions in
U.S. and Canada, including involuntary separation initiatives.
In addition, we have announced the suspension of our matching
contribution to certain defined contribution plans starting
November 1, 2008 as well as suspension of other
reimbursement programs for U.S. and Canadian salaried employees.
We also expect to realize salaried employment savings in Western
Europe in 2009 through a wage/salary freeze and other cost
reduction initiatives.
|
|
|
Additional GMNA structural cost reductions (estimated
$1.5 billion effect) We expect to reduce
GMNA structural cost by an additional $1.5 billion in 2009.
These additional reductions would result from the recently
announced acceleration of previously planned capacity actions
and other plant operating plan changes, additional efficiencies
in engineering resources aligned with further product plan
changes, continued marketing spending reductions aligned with
expected automotive industry conditions and intensified focus on
discretionary spending reductions.
|
|
|
Additional working capital reductions (estimated
$0.5 billion effect) GMNA is targeting
approximately $0.5 billion of additional working capital
reductions beyond the original 2008 target reduction level of
$1.5 billion. This additional target reduction is expected
to be achieved by continuing to focus on inventory reductions
and initiatives related to accounts payable.
|
|
|
Additional capital expenditure reductions (estimated
$2.5 billion effect) In the absence of
federal funding support, 2009 capital spending will be reduced
from the revised target of $7.2 billion announced on
July 15 to $4.8 billion. This reduction will be
achieved primarily through deferrals of selected programs (e.g.,
the Cadillac CTS coupe and the next generation Chevy Aveo for
the global market) and related capacity reduction projects.
However, we are still planning to increase global spending for
fuel economy improvements, and spending related to the Chevy
Volt will continue. Beyond 2009, capital expenditures will
stabilize in the $6.5 billion to $7.0 billion range
(excluding China, which is self funded with our joint venture
partner).
|
These actions are intended to conserve or generate cash of up to
$20.0 billion in response to deterioration in the global
economy, particularly the automotive industry, so that we can
preserve adequate liquidity throughout the period from
September 30, 2008 to December 31, 2009. However, the
full effect of many of these actions will not be realized until
later in 2009, even if they are successfully implemented. We are
committed to exploring all of the initiatives discussed above
because there is no assurance that industry or capital markets
conditions will improve within that time frame. Our ability to
continue as a going concern is substantially dependent on the
successful execution of many of the actions referred to above,
on the timeline contemplated by our plans.
|
|
|
Change
in Presentation of Financial Statements
|
We reclassified prior period results for the retroactive effect
of discontinued operations. Refer to Note 3. In the nine
months ended September 30, 2008, we reclassified immaterial
amounts related to a vehicle assembly agreement from Automotive
cost of sales to Automotive sales to report the arrangement on a
net basis for all periods presented. Certain reclassifications,
including inter-segment eliminations between Corporate and FIO,
have been made to the 2007 financial information to conform to
the current period presentation.
Change in
Accounting Principles
On January 1, 2008 we adopted Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements (SFAS No. 157), which provides a
consistent definition of fair value that focuses on exit price
and prioritizes, within a measurement of fair value, the use of
market-based inputs over company-specific inputs.
SFAS No. 157 requires expanded disclosures about fair
value measurements and establishes a three-level hierarchy for
fair value measurements based on the
9
GENERAL
MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
observable inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability at
the measurement date. The standard also requires that a company
consider its own nonperformance risk when measuring liabilities
carried at fair value, including derivatives. In February 2008
the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) approved FASB
Staff Position (FSP)
No. FAS 157-2,
Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157 (FSP
No. FAS 157-2),
that permits companies to partially defer the effective date of
SFAS No. 157 for one year for nonfinancial assets and
nonfinancial liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at
fair value in the financial statements on a nonrecurring basis.
FSP
No. FAS 157-2
does not permit companies to defer recognition and disclosure
requirements for financial assets and financial liabilities or
for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities that are
remeasured at least annually. SFAS No. 157 is
effective for financial assets and financial liabilities and for
nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities that are
remeasured at least annually for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal
years. The provisions of SFAS No. 157 are applied
prospectively. We have decided to defer adoption of
SFAS No. 157 for one year for nonfinancial assets and
nonfinancial liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at
fair value in the financial statements on a nonrecurring basis.
The effect of our adoption of SFAS No. 157 on
January 1, 2008 was not material and no adjustment to
Accumulated deficit was required. Refer to Note 6 for the
effect the adoption by GMAC of this standard had on our
financial condition. Refer to Note 13 for more information
regarding the effect of our adoption of SFAS No. 157
with respect to financial assets and liabilities. We are
currently unable to quantify the effect, if any that the
adoption of SFAS No. 157 for nonfinancial assets and
nonfinancial liabilities will have on our financial condition
and results of operations.
|
|
|
The
Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities Including an Amendment of
SFAS No. 115
|
On January 1, 2008 we adopted SFAS No. 159,
The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities Including an Amendment of FASB Statement
No. 115 (SFAS No. 159), which permits a
company to measure certain financial assets and financial
liabilities at fair value that were not previously required to
be measured at fair value. We have not elected to measure any
financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value which
were not previously required to be measured at fair value.
Therefore, the adoption of this standard has had no effect on
our results of operations. Refer to Note 6 for the effect
the adoption by GMAC of this standard had on our financial
condition.
|
|
|
Determining
the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That
Asset is Not Active
|
In October 2008 the FASB issued FSP
No. 157-3,
Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the
Market for That Asset is Not Active (FSP
No. 157-3),
which clarifies the application of SFAS No. 157 in a
market that is not active and provides an example to illustrate
key considerations in determining the fair value of a financial
asset when the market for that financial asset is not active.
The effect of applying the guidance in FSP
No. 157-3
at September 30, 2008 was not material.
|
|
|
Accounting
for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
|
On January 1, 2007 we adopted FASB Interpretation (FIN)
No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes an interpretation of FASB Statement
No. 109 (FIN No. 48), which supplements
SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes
(SFAS No. 109), by defining the confidence level that
a tax position must meet in order to be recognized in the
financial statements. FIN No. 48 requires that the tax
effect(s) of a position be recognized only if it is more
likely than not to be sustained based solely on its
technical merits as of the reporting date. The more likely than
not threshold represents a positive assertion by management that
a company is entitled to the economic benefits of a tax
position. If a tax position is not considered more likely than
not to be sustained based solely on its technical merits, no
benefits of the tax position are to be recognized. The more
likely than not threshold must continue to be met in each
reporting period to support continued recognition of a benefit.
With the adoption of FIN No. 48, companies were
required to adjust their financial statements to reflect only
those tax positions that are more likely than not to be
sustained. We adopted FIN No. 48 at January 1,
2007, and recorded a decrease to Accumulated deficit of
$137 million as a cumulative effect of a change in
accounting principle with a corresponding decrease to our
liability for uncertain tax positions.
10
GENERAL
MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Accounting
Standards Not Yet Adopted
In December 2007 the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R),
Business Combinations (SFAS No. 141(R)),
which retained the underlying concepts under existing standards
that all business combinations be accounted for at fair value
under the acquisition method of accounting. However,
SFAS No. 141(R) changes the method of applying the
acquisition method in a number of significant aspects.
SFAS No. 141(R) will require that: (1) for all
business combinations, the acquirer records all assets and
liabilities of the acquired business, including goodwill,
generally at their fair values; (2) certain pre-acquisition
contingent assets and liabilities acquired be recognized at
their fair values on the acquisition date; (3) contingent
consideration be recognized at its fair value on the acquisition
date and, for certain arrangements, changes in fair value be
recognized in earnings until settled;
(4) acquisition-related transaction and restructuring costs
be expensed rather than treated as part of the cost of the
acquisition and included in the amount recorded for assets
acquired; (5) in step acquisitions, previous equity
interests in an acquiree held prior to obtaining control be
re-measured to their acquisition-date fair values, with any gain
or loss recognized in earnings; and (6) when making
adjustments to finalize initial accounting, companies revise any
previously issued post-acquisition financial information in
future financial statements to reflect any adjustments as if
they had been recorded on the acquisition date.
SFAS No. 141(R) is effective on a prospective basis
for all business combinations for which the acquisition date is
on or after the beginning of the first annual period subsequent
to December 15, 2008, with the exception of the accounting
for valuation allowances on deferred taxes and acquired tax
contingencies. SFAS No. 141(R) amends
SFAS No. 109 such that adjustments made to valuation
allowances on deferred taxes and acquired tax contingencies
associated with acquisitions that closed prior to the effective
date of SFAS No. 141(R) should also apply the
provisions of this standard. Once effective, this standard will
be applied to all future business combinations.
|
|
|
Noncontrolling
Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements
|
In December 2007 the FASB issued SFAS No. 160,
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements, an Amendment of ARB 51
(SFAS No. 160), which amends Accounting Research
Bulletin (ARB) No. 51, Consolidated Financial
Statements (ARB No. 51), to establish new standards
that will govern the accounting for and reporting of
noncontrolling interests in partially owned consolidated
subsidiaries and the loss of control of subsidiaries. Also,
SFAS No. 160 requires that: (1) noncontrolling
interest, previously referred to as minority interest, be
reported as part of equity in the consolidated financial
statements; (2) losses be allocated to the noncontrolling
interest even when such allocation might result in a deficit
balance, reducing the losses attributed to the controlling
interest; (3) changes in ownership interests be treated as
equity transactions if control is maintained; (4) upon a
loss of control, any gain or loss on the interest sold be
recognized in earnings; and (5) the noncontrolling
interests share be recorded at the fair value of net
assets acquired, plus its share of goodwill.
SFAS No. 160 is effective on a prospective basis for
fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years,
beginning on or after December 15, 2008, except for the
presentation and disclosure requirements, which will be applied
retrospectively. We are currently evaluating the effects that
SFAS No. 160 will have on our financial condition and
results of operations.
|
|
|
Disclosures
about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133
|
In March 2008 the FASB issued SFAS No. 161,
Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities an Amendment of FASB Statement
No. 133 (SFAS No. 161), which expands the
disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 133,
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities (SFAS No. 133).
SFAS No. 161 requires additional disclosures
regarding: (1) how and why a company uses derivative
instruments; (2) how derivative instruments and related
hedged items are accounted for under SFAS No. 133; and
(3) how derivative instruments and related hedged items
affect a companys financial position, financial
performance, and cash flows. In addition, SFAS No. 161
requires qualitative disclosures about objectives and strategies
for using derivatives described in the context of a
companys risk exposures, quantitative disclosures about
the location and fair value of derivative instruments and
associated gains and losses, and disclosures about
credit-risk-related
11
GENERAL
MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
contingent features in derivative instruments.
SFAS No. 161 is effective for fiscal years and interim
periods within those fiscal years, beginning after
November 15, 2008.
|
|
|
Accounting
for Convertible Debt Instruments
|
In May 2008 the FASB ratified FSP No. APB
14-1,
Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be
Settled in Cash Upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash
Settlement) (FSP No. APB
14-1), which
requires issuers of convertible debt securities within its scope
to separate these securities into a debt component and an equity
component, resulting in the debt component being recorded at
fair value without consideration given to the conversion
feature. Issuance costs are also allocated between the debt and
equity components. FSP No. APB
14-1 will
require that convertible debt within its scope reflect a
companys nonconvertible debt borrowing rate when interest
expense is recognized. FSP No. APB
14-1 is
effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods
within those fiscal years, and shall be applied retrospectively
to all prior periods. We estimate that upon adoption, interest
expense will increase for all periods presented with fiscal year
2009 pre-tax interest expense increasing by approximately
$110 million based on our current level of indebtedness.
|
|
|
Participating
Share-Based Payment Awards
|
In June 2008 the FASB ratified FSP No EITF
03-6-1,
Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based
Payment Transactions are Participating Securities (FSP
No. EITF
03-6-1),
which addresses whether instruments granted in share-based
payment awards are participating securities prior to vesting
and, therefore, must be included in the earnings allocation in
calculating earnings per share under the two-class method
described in SFAS No. 128, Earnings per
Share (SFAS No. 128). FSP No. EITF
03-6-1
requires that unvested share-based payment awards that contain
non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend-equivalents be
treated as participating securities in calculating earnings per
share. FSP No. EITF
03-6-1 is
effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods
within those fiscal years, and shall be applied retrospectively
to all prior periods. We are currently evaluating the effects,
if any, that FSP No. EITF
03-6-1 may
have on our earnings per share.
|
|
|
Determination
of Whether an Equity-Linked Financial Instrument (or Embedded
Feature) is Indexed to an Entitys Own Stock
|
In June 2008 the FASB ratified EITF
No. 07-5,
Determining Whether an Instrument (or Embedded Feature) is
Indexed to an Entitys Own Stock (EITF
No. 07-5),
which requires that an instruments contingent exercise
provisions be analyzed first. If this evaluation does not
preclude consideration of an instrument as indexed to its own
stock, the instruments settlement provisions are then
analyzed. EITF
No. 07-5
is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods
within those fiscal years, with recognition of a cumulative
effect of a change in accounting principle for all instruments
existing at the effective date to the balance of retained
earnings. We are currently evaluating the effects, if any, that
EITF
No. 07-5
may have on our financial condition and results of operations.
|
|
|
Accounting
for Collaborative Arrangements
|
In December 2007 the FASB ratified EITF
No. 07-1,
Accounting for Collaborative Arrangements (EITF
No. 07-1),
which requires revenue generated and costs incurred by the
parties in the collaborative arrangement be reported in the
appropriate line in each companys financial statements
pursuant to the guidance in EITF
No. 99-19,
Reporting Revenue Gross as a Principal versus Net as an
Agent (EITF
No. 99-19),
and not account for such arrangements using the equity method of
accounting. EITF
No. 07-1
also includes enhanced disclosure requirements regarding the
nature and purpose of the arrangement, rights and obligations
under the arrangement, accounting policy, and the amount and
income statement classification of collaboration transactions
between the parties. EITF
No. 07-1
is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years, and shall
be applied retrospectively (if practicable) to all prior periods
presented for all
12
GENERAL
MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
collaborative arrangements existing as of the effective date. We
are currently evaluating the effects, if any, that EITF
No. 07-1
may have on the presentation and classification of these
activities in our consolidated financial statements.
|
|
|
Accounting
by Lessees for Nonrefundable Maintenance Deposits
|
In June 2008 the FASB ratified EITF
No. 08-3,
Accounting by Lessees for Nonrefundable Maintenance
Deposits (EITF
No. 08-3),
which specifies that nonrefundable maintenance deposits that are
contractually and substantively related to maintenance of leased
assets be accounted for as deposit assets. EITF
No. 08-3
is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2008, with recognition of a
cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle to the
opening balance of retained earnings for the first year
presented. We are currently evaluating the effects, if any, that
EITF
No. 08-3
may have on our financial condition and results of operations.
Note 3. Divesture
of Business
|
|
|
Sale
of Allison Transmission Business
|
In August 2007, we completed the sale of the commercial and
military operations of our Allison Transmission (Allison)
business. The results of operations and cash flows of Allison
have been reported in our condensed consolidated financial
statements as discontinued operations in the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2007. Historically, Allison was
reported within GMNA.
The following table summarizes the results of discontinued
operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
164
|
|
|
$
|
1,225
|
|
Operating income from discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
73
|
|
|
$
|
409
|
|
Income tax provision
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
$
|
148
|
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
$
|
45
|
|
|
$
|
256
|
|
Gain on sale of discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
$
|
3,504
|
|
|
$
|
3,504
|
|
As part of the transaction, we entered into an agreement with
the buyers of Allison whereby we may provide the new parent
company of Allison with contingent financing of up to
$100 million. Such financing would be made available if,
during a defined period of time, Allison was not in compliance
with its financial maintenance covenant under a separate credit
agreement. Our financing would be contingent on the stockholders
of the new parent company of Allison committing to provide an
equivalent amount of funding to Allison, either in the form of
equity or a loan, and, if a loan, such loan would be granted on
the same terms as our loan to the new parent company of Allison.
At September 30, 2008 we have not provided financing
pursuant to this agreement. This commitment expires on
December 31, 2010. Additionally, both parties have entered
into non-compete arrangements for a term of 10 years in the
United States and for a term of five years in Europe.
Note 4. Finance
Receivables and Securitizations
We generate receivables from sales of vehicles to our dealer
network domestically, as well as from service parts and
powertrain sales. In connection with the related trade accounts
receivables program, in September 2007 we renewed an agreement
to sell undivided interests in eligible trade receivables of up
to $600 million directly to banks and to a bank conduit.
Under this agreement, the receivables were sold at fair market
value and removed from our condensed consolidated balance sheet
at the time of sale. This agreement expired in September 2008.
13
GENERAL
MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
In September 2008, we entered into a one year revolving
securitization borrowing program that provides financing of up
to $197 million. The trade receivables, which serve as
security under this agreement, are isolated in wholly-owned
bankruptcy remote special purpose entities, which in turn pledge
the receivables to lending institutions. The pledged receivables
are reported in Accounts and notes receivable, net and
borrowings are reported as Short-term borrowings on the
condensed consolidated balance sheet. At September 30,
2008, $451 million of receivables were pledged and
borrowings of $180 million were outstanding under this
program.
Note 5. Inventories
The following table summarizes the components of inventory:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Productive material, work in process and supplies
|
|
$
|
6,477
|
|
|
$
|
6,267
|
|
|
$
|
6,434
|
|
Finished product, including service parts
|
|
|
11,897
|
|
|
|
10,095
|
|
|
|
10,550
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventories at FIFO
|
|
|
18,374
|
|
|
|
16,362
|
|
|
|
16,984
|
|
Less LIFO allowance
|
|
|
(1,460
|
)
|
|
|
(1,423
|
)
|
|
|
(1,454
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total automotive inventories
|
|
|
16,914
|
|
|
|
14,939
|
|
|
|
15,530
|
|
FIO off-lease vehicles, included in FIO Other assets
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
|
254
|
|
|
|
237
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventories
|
|
$
|
17,138
|
|
|
$
|
15,193
|
|
|
$
|
15,767
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 6. Investment
in Nonconsolidated Affiliates
The following table summarizes information regarding our share
of net income (loss) of our nonconsolidated affiliates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMAC
|
|
$
|
(1,235
|
)
|
|
$
|
(809
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,741
|
)
|
|
$
|
(874
|
)
|
GMAC Common Membership Interests impairments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,036
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Shanghai General Motors Co., Ltd and SAIC-GM-Wuling Automobile
Co., Ltd.
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
306
|
|
Others
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(1,185
|
)
|
|
$
|
(695
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,467
|
)
|
|
$
|
(434
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
GENERAL
MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
The following tables summarize financial information of GMAC:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total financing revenue
|
|
$
|
4,641
|
|
|
$
|
5,381
|
|
|
$
|
14,395
|
|
|
$
|
15,994
|
|
Depreciation expense on operating lease assets
|
|
$
|
1,412
|
|
|
$
|
1,276
|
|
|
$
|
4,209
|
|
|
$
|
3,530
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
$
|
2,906
|
|
|
$
|
3,715
|
|
|
$
|
8,953
|
|
|
$
|
11,122
|
|
Loss before income tax expense
|
|
$
|
(2,621
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,664
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,500
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,367
|
)
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
$
|
(98
|
)
|
|
$
|
(68
|
)
|
|
$
|
94
|
|
|
$
|
241
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(2,523
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,596
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,594
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,608
|
)
|
Net loss available to members
|
|
$
|
(2,523
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,649
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,594
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,765
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held for sale
|
|
$
|
11,979
|
|
|
$
|
20,559
|
|
|
$
|
23,992
|
|
Finance receivables and loans, net
|
|
$
|
109,290
|
|
|
$
|
124,759
|
|
|
$
|
143,612
|
|
Investment in operating leases, net
|
|
$
|
30,628
|
|
|
$
|
32,348
|
|
|
$
|
31,300
|
|
Other assets
|
|
$
|
26,152
|
|
|
$
|
28,255
|
|
|
$
|
27,570
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
211,327
|
|
|
$
|
248,939
|
|
|
$
|
278,778
|
|
Total debt
|
|
$
|
160,631
|
|
|
$
|
193,148
|
|
|
$
|
221,100
|
|
Accrued expenses, deposit and other liabilities
|
|
$
|
30,525
|
|
|
$
|
28,713
|
|
|
$
|
29,971
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
$
|
202,079
|
|
|
$
|
233,374
|
|
|
$
|
262,514
|
|
Redeemable preferred membership interests
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,226
|
|
Preferred interests
|
|
$
|
1,052
|
|
|
$
|
1,052
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
$
|
9,248
|
|
|
$
|
15,565
|
|
|
$
|
14,038
|
|
The following table summarizes information related to our
Preferred and Common Membership Interests in GMAC:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Preferred Membership Interests (shares)
|
|
|
1,021,764
|
|
|
|
1,021,764
|
|
|
|
1,555,000
|
|
Percentage ownership of Preferred Membership Interests issued
and outstanding
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
74
|
%
|
Carrying value of Preferred Membership Interests
|
|
$
|
43
|
|
|
$
|
1,044
|
|
|
$
|
1,594
|
|
Carrying value of Common Membership Interests
|
|
$
|
1,949
|
|
|
$
|
7,079
|
|
|
$
|
6,852
|
|
In the three month periods ended March 31 and June 30,
2008, we determined that our investment in GMAC Common
Membership Interests was impaired and in the three month periods
ended March 31, June 30 and September 30, 2008 that
our investment in GMAC Preferred Membership Interests was
impaired and that such impairments were other than temporary.
15
GENERAL
MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
The following table summarizes the impairment charges we have
recorded against our investment in GMAC Common and Preferred
Membership Interests:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
Ended September 30,
|
|
|
Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
GMAC Common Membership Interests
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,036
|
|
GMAC Preferred Membership Interests
|
|
|
251
|
|
|
|
1,001
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
251
|
|
|
$
|
3,037
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment charges are recorded in Equity in loss of GMAC LLC
and Automotive interest income and other non-operating income,
net for our investment in GMAC Common and Preferred Membership
Interests, respectively.
Our measurements of fair value were determined in accordance
with SFAS No. 157 utilizing Level 3 inputs of the
fair value hierarchy established in SFAS No. 157.
Refer to Note 13 for further information on the specific
valuation methodology.
In the nine months ended September 30, 2008, GMAC was not
required under the terms of the Preferred Membership Interests
to, and elected not to, pay a dividend on our Preferred
Membership Interests. We accrued dividends of $39 million
and $116 million in the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2007, respectively, related to our Preferred
Membership Interests and such dividends were subsequently paid
to us by GMAC.
On January 1, 2008 GMAC adopted SFAS No. 157 and
No. 159. As a result of its adoption of
SFAS No. 157, GMAC recorded an adjustment to retained
earnings related to the recognition of day-one gains on
purchased mortgage servicing rights and certain residential loan
commitments. As a result of its adoption of
SFAS No. 159, GMAC elected to measure, at fair value,
certain financial assets and liabilities including certain
collateralized debt obligations and certain mortgage loans held
for investment in financing securitization structures. As a
result, we reduced our Equity in net assets of GMAC LLC and
increased our Accumulated deficit by $76 million in the
nine months ended September 30, 2008 reflecting our
proportionate share of the cumulative effect of GMACs
adoption of SFAS No. 157 and No. 159.
Refer to Note 18 for a description of the related party
transactions with GMAC.
|
|
|
Electro-Motive
Diesel, Inc.
|
In April 2008 we converted a note receivable with a basis of
$37 million, which resulted from the sale of our
Electro-Motive Division in April 2005, into a 30% common equity
interest in Electro-Motive Diesel, Inc. the successor company
(EMD). We subsequently sold our common equity interest in EMD
for $80 million in cash and a note receivable of
$7 million, due in December 2008. In the nine months ended
September 30, 2008, we recognized a gain on the sale of our
common equity interest of $50 million, which is recorded in
Automotive interest income and other non-operating income, net.
16
GENERAL
MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 7. Depreciation
and Amortization
The following table summarizes depreciation and amortization,
including asset impairment charges, included in Automotive cost
of sales, Selling, general and administrative expense, and
Financial services and insurance expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Automotive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and impairment
|
|
$
|
1,175
|
|
|
$
|
1,237
|
|
|
$
|
3,580
|
|
|
$
|
3,725
|
|
Amortization and impairment of special tools
|
|
|
749
|
|
|
|
744
|
|
|
|
2,348
|
|
|
|
2,327
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,945
|
|
|
|
1,997
|
|
|
|
5,989
|
|
|
|
6,103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing and Insurance Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and impairment
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
297
|
|
|
|
519
|
|
|
|
1,010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated depreciation and amortization
|
|
$
|
1,968
|
|
|
$
|
2,294
|
|
|
$
|
6,508
|
|
|
$
|
7,113
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 8. Long-Term
Debt and Revolving Credit Agreements
In September 2008, we entered into agreements with a qualified
institutional holder of our 1.50% Series D convertible
senior debentures due in 2009 (Series D debentures).
Pursuant to these agreements, we issued an aggregate of
44 million shares of our common stock in exchange for
$498 million principal amount of our Series D
debentures. In accordance with the agreements, the amount of our
common stock exchanged for the Series D debentures was
based on the daily volume weighted average price of our common
stock on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) in the contractual
three- and
four-day
pricing periods.
We entered into the agreements, in part, to reduce our debt and
interest costs, increase our equity, and thereby improve our
liquidity. We did not receive any cash proceeds from the
exchange of our common stock for the Series D debentures,
which have been retired and cancelled. As a result of this
exchange, we recorded a settlement gain of $19 million in
Automotive interest income and other non-operating income, net
in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008.
On March 6, 2007, Series A convertible debentures in
the amount of $1.1 billion were put to us and settled
entirely in cash. At September 30, 2008 and 2007, the
principal amount of outstanding Series A convertible
debentures was $39 million.
|
|
|
Borrowings
Under Revolving Credit Agreements
|
On August 1, 2008 and September 24, 2008, we borrowed
$1.0 billion and $3.4 billion, respectively, against
our $4.5 billion standby revolving credit facility, which
terminates in 2011. Under the secured facility, borrowings are
limited to an amount based on the value of the underlying
collateral. At September 30, 2008, $4.4 billion was
outstanding under this facility, with no further availability.
17
GENERAL
MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 9. Product
Warranty Liability
The following table summarizes activity for policy, product
warranty, recall campaigns and certified used vehicle warranty
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
9,615
|
|
|
$
|
9,064
|
|
|
$
|
9,064
|
|
Warranties issued during period
|
|
|
3,351
|
|
|
|
5,135
|
|
|
|
3,742
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
(3,938
|
)
|
|
|
(4,539
|
)
|
|
|
(3,395
|
)
|
Adjustments to pre-existing warranties
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
|
(165
|
)
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
Effect of foreign currency translation
|
|
|
(190
|
)
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
301
|
|
Liabilities transferred in the sale of Allison (Note 3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(103
|
)
|
|
|
(103
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
9,041
|
|
|
$
|
9,615
|
|
|
$
|
9,512
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We review and adjust these estimates on a regular basis based on
the differences between actual experience and historical
estimates or other available information.
Note 10. Pensions
and Other Postretirement Benefits
The following tables summarize the components of Net periodic
pension and other postretirement benefits (OPEB) (income)
expense from continuing operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Plans
|
|
|
Non-U.S. Plans
|
|
|
U.S. Other
|
|
|
Non-U.S.
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Other Benefits
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
Components of (income) expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
122
|
|
|
$
|
155
|
|
|
$
|
113
|
|
|
$
|
134
|
|
|
$
|
54
|
|
|
$
|
92
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
1,398
|
|
|
|
1,216
|
|
|
|
310
|
|
|
|
279
|
|
|
|
845
|
|
|
|
901
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(2,006
|
)
|
|
|
(1,986
|
)
|
|
|
(234
|
)
|
|
|
(240
|
)
|
|
|
(325
|
)
|
|
|
(350
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost (credit)
|
|
|
207
|
|
|
|
1,686
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(494
|
)
|
|
|
(455
|
)
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
Amortization of transition obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized net actuarial loss
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
337
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
Curtailments, settlements and other
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
(3,192
|
)
|
|
|
(214
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Divestiture of Allison
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
216
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic pension and OPEB (income) expense from continuing
operations
|
|
$
|
(159
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,282
|
|
|
$
|
306
|
|
|
$
|
276
|
|
|
$
|
(2,996
|
)
|
|
$
|
527
|
|
|
$
|
72
|
|
|
$
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
GENERAL
MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Plans
|
|
|
Non-U.S. Plans
|
|
|
U.S. Other
|
|
|
Non-U.S.
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Other Benefits
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Components of (income) expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
412
|
|
|
$
|
475
|
|
|
$
|
315
|
|
|
$
|
363
|
|
|
$
|
199
|
|
|
$
|
278
|
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
3,993
|
|
|
|
3,648
|
|
|
|
943
|
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
|
2,678
|
|
|
|
2,704
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(6,120
|
)
|
|
|
(5,958
|
)
|
|
|
(730
|
)
|
|
|
(688
|
)
|
|
|
(1,010
|
)
|
|
|
(1,050
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost (credit)
|
|
|
615
|
|
|
|
1,946
|
|
|
|
388
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
(1,424
|
)
|
|
|
(1,378
|
)
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
Amortization of transition obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized net actuarial loss
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
630
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
490
|
|
|
|
1,016
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
Curtailments, settlements and other
|
|
|
3,313
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
237
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
(3,225
|
)
|
|
|
(213
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Divestiture of Allison
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic pension and OPEB (income) expense from continuing
operations
|
|
$
|
2,414
|
|
|
$
|
736
|
|
|
$
|
1,368
|
|
|
$
|
802
|
|
|
$
|
(2,292
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,568
|
|
|
$
|
216
|
|
|
$
|
203
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We recognize the funded status of our defined benefit plans in
accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 158,
Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and
Other Postretirement Plans, an amendment of FASB Statements
No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R) (SFAS No. 158).
Additionally, we elected to early adopt the measurement date
provisions of SFAS No. 158 at January 1, 2007.
Those provisions require the measurement date for plan assets
and obligations to coincide with the sponsors year end.
Using the two-measurement approach for those defined
benefit plans where the measurement date was not historically
consistent with our year end, we recorded an increase to
Accumulated deficit of $728 million, $425 million
after-tax, representing the net periodic benefit expense for the
period between the measurement date utilized in 2006 and the
beginning of 2007, which previously would have been recorded in
the three months ended March 31, 2007 on a delayed basis.
We also performed a measurement at January 1, 2007 for
those benefit plans whose previous measurement dates were not
historically consistent with our year end. As a result of the
January 1, 2007 measurement, we recorded a decrease to
Accumulated other comprehensive loss of $2.3 billion,
$1.5 billion after-tax, representing other changes in the
fair value of the plan assets and the benefit obligations for
the period between the measurement date utilized in 2006 and
January 1, 2007. These amounts are offset partially by an
immaterial adjustment of $390 million, $250 million
after-tax, to correct certain demographic information used in
determining the amount of the cumulative effect of a change in
accounting principle reported at December 31, 2006 to adopt
the recognition provisions of SFAS No. 158.
As a result of the Allison divestiture discussed in Note 3,
we recorded an adjustment to the unamortized prior service cost
of our U.S. hourly and salaried pension plans of
$18 million and our U.S. hourly and salaried OPEB plans of
$223 million in the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2007. Those adjustments were included in the
determination of the gain recognized on the sale of Allison. The
net periodic pension and OPEB (income) expenses related to
Allison were reported as a component of Discontinued operations.
All such amounts related to Allison are reflected in the tables
above, and the effects of those amounts are shown as an
adjustment to arrive at Net periodic pension and OPEB (income)
expense from continuing operations.
19
GENERAL
MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Significant
Plan Amendments, Benefit Modifications and Related
Events
|
In the nine months ended September 30, 2008 a number of
significant events related to our benefit plans occurred, many
of which required remeasurements of our various pension and OPEB
plans. The more significant events included:
|
|
|
|
|
The Settlement Agreement became effective, which transfers to
the UAW our obligation to provide retiree health care coverage
for GM-UAW retirees effective January 1, 2010. In
conjunction with the Settlement Agreement, we remeasured our UAW
hourly medical plan, our Mitigation Plan and our U.S. hourly
pension plan at September 1, 2008.
|
|
|
We implemented special attrition programs to further reduce the
number of hourly employees. These programs required that we
remeasure our U.S. hourly pension plan and UAW hourly medical
plan at May 31, 2008.
|
|
|
We amended our U.S. salaried retiree medical and pension plans
to eliminate health care coverage for U.S. salaried retirees
over age 65. These amendments required that we remeasure
our U.S. salaried retiree medical and U.S. salaried pension
plans at July 1, 2008.
|
|
|
We assumed certain pension and OPEB obligations for Delphi
employees, which required that we remeasure certain OPEB plans
and our U.S. hourly pension plan at September 30, 2008.
|
|
|
An agreement to increase pension benefits to certain Canadian
hourly workers and certain facility idlings required that we
remeasure our Canadian hourly and salaried pension plans and the
Canadian hourly retiree plan at May 31, 2008.
|
|
|
In the intervening time period, from May 31, 2008 to
September 30, 2008 we experienced actual plan asset losses
of $6.0 billion in our U.S. hourly pension plan based on
the foregoing remeasurements.
|
|
|
|
2008
GM-UAW Settlement Agreement
|
In October 2007, we signed a Memorandum of
Understanding Post-Retirement Medical Care (Retiree
MOU) with the International Union, United Automotive, Aerospace
and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (UAW), now
superseded by the settlement agreement entered into in February
2008 (Settlement Agreement). The Settlement Agreement provides
that responsibility for providing retiree healthcare will
permanently shift from us to a new retiree plan (New Plan)
funded by a new independent Voluntary Employee Beneficiary
Association (New VEBA). The United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Michigan (Court) certified the class and
granted preliminary approval of the Settlement Agreement and we
mailed notices to the class in March 2008. The fairness hearing
was held on June 3, 2008 and on July 31, 2008 the
Court approved the Settlement Agreement. Before it could become
effective, the Settlement Agreement was subject to the
exhaustion of any appeals of the July 31, 2008 Court
approval and the completion of discussions between us and the
staff of the SEC regarding the accounting treatment for the
transactions contemplated by the Settlement Agreement on a basis
we believe to be reasonably satisfactory.
On September 2, 2008 (Final Effective Date), the judgment
became final as the period to file appeals related to the
Courts order expired, with no appeals filed. In September
2008, we determined that discussions between us and the staff of
the SEC regarding the accounting treatment for the transaction
contemplated by the Settlement Agreement were completed on a
basis we believe to be reasonably satisfactory. Therefore, the
Settlement Agreement is now effective and under the terms of the
Settlement Agreement, on January 1, 2010 (Implementation
Date), our obligation to provide retiree healthcare coverage for
GM-UAW retirees and beneficiaries will terminate. The obligation
for retiree medical claims incurred on or after such date will
be the responsibility of the New Plan and New VEBA.
As a result of the Settlement Agreement becoming effective, we
remeasured the obligations and plan assets of our UAW hourly
medical plan and Mitigation Plan (as defined in the 2007
10-K) using
updated assumptions at September 1, 2008. The remeasured
accumulated postretirement benefit obligation (APBO) included:
(1) the expected benefit payments from the Final Effective
Date to the Implementation Date, discounted at a rate of 5.1%;
(2) the expected payments to the New VEBA, on or after the
Implementation Date, as agreed to in the Settlement Agreement,
discounted at the contractual discount rate of 9.0%; and
(3) a $450 million payment to the New VEBA which is
contingent upon substantial consummation of a plan of
reorganization (POR) by Delphi Corporation (Delphi). The
discount rate of 5.1% was determined based on the yield of an
optimized hypothetical portfolio of high-quality bonds rated AA
or higher by a recognized rating agency with maturities
20
GENERAL
MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
through December 31, 2009 sufficient to fully defease the
obligation for expected benefit payments before the
Implementation Date. Additionally, the expected payments to the
New VEBA after the Implementation Date assume that we will:
(1) be required to make all twenty annual shortfall
payments of $165 million to the New VEBA (discussed below);
(2) not elect to prepay any contributions to the New VEBA;
and (3) contribute the $450 million payment to the New
VEBA which is contingent upon Delphis POR. The
remeasurement of the UAW hourly medical plan resulted in a
reduction of our APBO of $13.1 billion from the
May 31, 2008 plan remeasurement, substantially all of which
was recorded as an actuarial gain in Other comprehensive loss
that will be amortized with other net actuarial gains and losses
over the remaining life expectancy of plan participants. The
decrease in APBO includes $1.7 billion of reduced retiree
healthcare benefits that were offset by a flat monthly special
lifetime benefit of $66.70 commencing January 1, 2010 to be
paid to plan participants out of the U.S. hourly pension plan
(discussed below). This has been recorded as an actuarial gain
in Other comprehensive loss and will be recognized as a
component of the settlement gain or loss for the UAW hourly
medical plan recorded at the Implementation Date. Additionally,
we recorded a $622 million benefit in the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2008 pursuant to the Settlement
Agreement for the reduction of our post-Implementation Date
liability related to our assumption of the Delphi healthcare
obligation for certain active and retired Delphi-UAW employees.
The remeasurement of the Mitigation Plan resulted in a
$200 million reduction of that plans APBO, which we
recorded as an actuarial gain in Other comprehensive loss that
will be subject to amortization with other net actuarial gains
and losses over the expected period of economic benefit for that
plan. Refer to Note 11 for additional information regarding
Delphi.
Also, as part of the September 1, 2008 plan remeasurements,
we recorded a net curtailment gain of $4.9 billion in the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, included in
Automotive cost of sales, representing the accelerated
recognition of the portion of net prior service credits which
had previously been scheduled for amortization after the
Implementation Date. The net curtailment gain was comprised of a
curtailment gain of $6.3 billion related to the UAW hourly
medical plan partially offset by a $1.4 billion curtailment
loss related to the Mitigation Plan.
From the Final Effective Date to the Implementation Date we will
record net periodic postretirement healthcare cost, including
service cost for UAW hourly medical plan participants working
toward eligibility and the amortization of remaining net prior
service credits. After the Implementation Date, no service cost
will be recorded for active UAW participants who continue to
work toward eligibility in the New Plan.
At the Implementation Date, we will account for the
establishment and funding of the New VEBA as a termination of
our UAW hourly medical plan and Mitigation Plan in accordance
with SFAS No. 106, Employers Accounting
for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions
(SFAS No. 106). The settlement gain or loss to be
recognized on the Implementation Date will include: (1) the
difference between fair value of the consideration to be
provided to the New VEBA and the carrying value of the UAW
hourly medical plan and Mitigation Plan obligations;
(2) the unamortized actuarial gains or losses remaining in
Accumulated other comprehensive loss at that date; and
(3) the cost of the increased pension benefit described
below.
The U.S. hourly pension plan was amended as part of the
Settlement Agreement to reflect a flat monthly special lifetime
benefit of $66.70 commencing January 1, 2010 to be paid to
plan participants to help offset the costs of monthly
contributions required under the terms of the New VEBA. As a
result, we remeasured our U.S. hourly pension plan at
September 1, 2008 to reflect this change in benefits using
a discount rate of 6.70%, which reflects a 25 basis point
increase from the May 31, 2008 plan remeasurement. The
remeasurement resulted in an increase to the projected benefit
obligation (PBO) of $563 million. The cost of the flat
monthly benefit, which was $2.7 billion at
September 1, 2008, has been recorded as a component of net
actuarial loss and will be recognized as a component of the
settlement gain or loss for the UAW hourly medical plan recorded
at the Implementation Date. We also experienced actual plan
asset losses of $2.1 billion at the September 1, 2008
remeasurement date since the previous measurement date of
May 31, 2008.
21
GENERAL
MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
In exchange for the transfer of our UAW hourly medical plan and
Mitigation Plan obligations to the New Plan, the terms of the
Settlement Agreement, as amended and agreed to by
Class Counsel, require us to make contributions to the New
VEBA as described below:
|
|
|
|
|
We may contribute $5.6 billion on the Implementation Date
or we may elect to make annual payments in varying amounts
between $421 million and $3.3 billion through 2020. At
any time after the Implementation Date we will have the option
to prepay all remaining payments at a discount rate of 9%.
|
|
|
In February 2008, we issued a $4.0 billion short-term note
(Short-Term Note) to LBK, LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company of which we are the sole member (LBK). The Short-Term
Note pays interest at a rate of 9.0% and matures on or before
the 20th business day after the Implementation Date. LBK will
hold the Short-Term Note until maturity at which point the
proceeds will be transferred to the New VEBA (or any other
holder of the Convertible Note).
|
|
|
In February 2008, we issued $4.4 billion principal amount
of our 6.75% Series U Convertible Senior Debentures due
December 31, 2012 (Convertible Note) to LBK. LBK will hold
the Convertible Note until it is transferred to the New VEBA.
The Convertible Note is convertible into 109 million shares
of our common stock. Interest on the Convertible Note is payable
semiannually. Interest payments of $296 million due in
2010, 2011 and 2012, after the Convertible Note is contributed
to the New VEBA, will be made directly to the New VEBA (or any
other holder of the Convertible Note).
|
|
|
In conjunction with the issuance of the Convertible Note, we
entered into certain cash-settled derivative instruments
maturing on June 30, 2011 with LBK that will have the
economic effect of reducing the conversion price of the
Convertible Note from $40 to $36 per share. These derivative
instruments will also entitle us to partially recover the
additional economic value provided if our common stock price
appreciates to between $63.48 and $70.53 per share by
June 30, 2011 and to fully recover the additional economic
value provided if our common stock price reaches $70.53 per
share or above by June 30, 2011. LBK will transfer its
interests in the derivatives to the New VEBA when the
Convertible Note is transferred from LBK to the New VEBA
following the Implementation Date.
|
|
|
Because LBK is a wholly-owned consolidated subsidiary, the
Short-Term Note, Convertible Note, derivatives and related
interest income and expense have been and will continue to be
eliminated in our condensed consolidated financial statements
until the Implementation Date.
|
|
|
Existing assets of the Mitigation Plan and a remaining
$1.0 billion contribution due in 2011.
|
|
|
Approximately $285 million of other payments to be made on
the Implementation Date.
|
|
|
We may be required to contribute $165 million per year
(Shortfall Payments), limited to a maximum of 20 payments, to
the New VEBA if annual cash flow projections show that the New
VEBA will become insolvent on a rolling
25-year
basis. When measuring our obligation at September 1, 2008,
we assumed we will be required to make all 20 payments. At any
time after the Implementation Date we will have the option to
prepay all remaining payments at a discount rate of 9%.
|
|
|
Effective January 1, 2008, we divided the existing internal
VEBA into two bookkeeping accounts. One account consists of the
percentage of the existing internal VEBAs assets that is
equal to the estimated percentage of our hourly OPEB obligation
covered by the existing internal VEBA attributable to non-UAW
represented employees and retirees, their eligible spouses,
surviving spouses and dependents (Non-UAW Related Account). The
second account consists of the remaining percentage of the
assets in the existing internal VEBA (UAW Related Account). No
amounts will be withdrawn from the UAW Related Account,
including its investment returns, until the transfer of assets
to the New VEBA. The UAW Related Account had a balance of
$13.4 billion at September 1, 2008.
|
The foregoing description of the required timing of the payments
reflects the deferral of $1.7 billion of payments which
were originally required to be contributed in 2008 and 2009, as
allowed by the Settlement Agreement and consented to by the
Class Counsel. This includes interest on the Convertible
Note, the Shortfall Payment of $165 million due in 2008 and
other of the required annual payments. These payments are
deferred until the Implementation Date and will be increased by
an annual interest rate factor of 9.0%.
22
GENERAL
MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
2008
Special Attrition Programs
|
In February 2008, we entered into agreements with the UAW and
the International Union of Electronic, Electrical, Salaried,
Machine and Furniture Workers of America
Communication Workers of America (IUE-CWA) regarding special
attrition programs which were intended to further reduce the
number of hourly employees. The UAW attrition program (2008 UAW
Special Attrition Program) offered to our 74,000 UAW-represented
employees consists of wage and benefit packages for normal and
voluntary retirements, buyouts or pre-retirement leaves for
employees with 26 to 29 years of service. In addition to
their vested pension benefits, those employees that are
retirement eligible will receive a lump sum payment, depending
upon job classification, that will be funded from our U.S.
hourly pension plan. For those employees not retirement
eligible, other buyout options were offered. The terms offered
to the 2,300 IUE-CWA-represented employees (2008 IUE-CWA Special
Attrition Program) are similar to those offered through the 2008
UAW Special Attrition Program. As a result of the 2008 UAW
Special Attrition Program and 2008 IUE-CWA Special Attrition
Program (2008 Special Attrition Programs), in the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 we recognized a curtailment loss
on the U.S. hourly pension plan in accordance with
SFAS No. 88, Employers Accounting for
Settlements and Curtailments of Defined Benefit Pension Plans
and for Termination Benefits (SFAS No. 88), of
$2.4 billion (measured at May 31, 2008) due to
the significant reduction in the expected aggregate years of
future service as a result of the employees accepting the
voluntary program. In addition, we recorded special termination
benefits of $800 million for irrevocable employee
acceptances in the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
The combined curtailment loss and other special termination
benefit charges of $3.2 billion were recorded in Automotive
cost of sales in the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
In addition to the expenses discussed above, the remeasurement
of the U.S. hourly pension plan at May 31, 2008 generated
an immaterial increase in net periodic pension income in the
nine months ended September 30, 2008, as compared to the
amount determined in connection with the December 31, 2007
remeasurement. The U.S. hourly pension plan remeasurement
resulted in an increase to the PBO of $842 million at
May 31, 2008, which includes the effect of other previously
announced facility idlings in the U.S. as well as changes in
certain actuarial assumptions. The discount rate used to
determine the PBO at May 31, 2008 was 6.45%. This
represents a 15 basis point increase from the 6.30% used at
December 31, 2007. The effect of this change is reflected
in Net periodic pension and OPEB (income) expense from
continuing operations.
In anticipation of the possibility of a curtailment as a result
of the 2008 UAW Special Attrition Program, we remeasured the UAW
hourly medical plan at May 31, 2008. Subsequent to the
remeasurement we determined that a curtailment did not occur;
however, as required by SFAS No. 106, we have recorded
the effects of the May 31, 2008 remeasurement of the UAW
hourly medical plan in our condensed consolidated financial
statements. This remeasurement resulted in an immaterial
adjustment to the APBO and Net periodic pension and OPEB
(income) expense from continuing operations. As a result of the
2008 Special Attrition Programs a number of smaller OPEB plans
were curtailed in accordance with SFAS No. 106. The
remeasurements of these plans in the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 resulted in a $104 million
curtailment gain. In addition, we recorded special termination
benefits and other costs of $68 million in the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 related to OPEB plans.
|
|
|
Salaried
Retiree Benefit Plan Changes
|
In July 2008, we amended our U.S. salaried retiree medical and
pension plans, effective January 1, 2009, to eliminate
healthcare coverage for U.S. salaried retirees over age 65.
Upon reaching age 65, affected retirees and surviving
spouses will receive a pension increase of $300 per month to
partially offset the cost of Medicare and supplemental
healthcare coverage. As a result of these plan changes, we
remeasured our U.S. salaried retiree medical and U.S. salaried
pension plans at July 1, 2008. For participants who are
age 65 or over on January 1, 2009, the elimination of
medical benefits, after considering the cost of the increased
pension benefits provided, resulted in a settlement loss of
$1.7 billion, which is substantially comprised of the
recognition of $1.8 billion of actuarial losses. The
$1.7 billion settlement loss was recorded in Automotive
cost of sales in the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008. For participants who are under the age
of 65, the future elimination of healthcare benefits upon their
turning age 65, and the increased pension benefits
provided, resulted in a negative plan amendment to the U.S.
salaried retiree medical plan and a positive plan amendment to
the U.S. salaried pension plan. The U.S.
23
GENERAL
MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
salaried retiree medical plan APBO was reduced by a net
$4.0 billion at the July 1, 2008 remeasurement date
from December 31, 2007, which included a $2.8 billion
reduction attributable to the settlement and a $900 million
reduction due to the negative plan amendment. The negative plan
amendment for the U.S. salaried retiree medical plan and the
positive plan amendment for the U.S. salaried pension plan will
both be amortized over seven years, which represents the average
remaining years to full eligibility for U.S. salaried retiree
medical plan participants. The U.S. salaried retiree medical
plan was remeasured using a discount rate of 6.75%, which
represents a 35 basis point increase from December 31,
2007. The U.S. salaried pension plan PBO increased by a net
$3.2 billion at the July 1, 2008 remeasurement date
from December 31, 2007, which included a $2.6 billion
increase attributable to the settlement and a $956 million
increase due to the positive plan amendment. We also experienced
actual plan asset losses of $700 million at the
July 1, 2008 remeasurement date since the previous
measurement. The pension plan was remeasured using a discount
rate of 6.60% which represents a 15 basis point increase from
December 31, 2007. As a result of the elimination of
healthcare benefits for participants age 65 and over in the
U.S. salaried retiree medical plan, all or almost all of the
participants in the plan are no longer inactive. Accordingly, we
have changed the U.S. salaried retiree medical plans
amortization period for plan amendments and actuarial gains and
losses effective with the July 1, 2008 remeasurement. Plan
amendments on or after July 1, 2008 will now be amortized
over the period to full eligibility and actuarial gains and
losses amortized over the average years of future service.
|
|
|
Salaried
Retirement Window Program
|
In September 2008, we extended voluntary early retirement offers
under our Salaried Retirement Window Program (Salaried Window
Program) to certain of our U.S. salaried employees as part of
our July 15, 2008 plan to reduce salary related costs.
Employees accepting the Salaried Window Program were originally
required to do so by October 24, 2008, however, the
acceptance period was subsequently extended to November 7,
2008, with the majority of retirements taking place on
November 1, 2008 and December 1, 2008. At
September 30, 2008, 600 employees irrevocably accepted the
Salaried Window Program, and as such, we recorded special
termination benefit charges of $47 million in Automotive
cost of sales in the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008 in accordance with SFAS No. 88
and SFAS No. 106. Because the offer period for the
Salaried Window Program extended into November 2008, additional
acceptances were received in the three months ending
December 31, 2008 and accordingly, additional amounts will
be expensed in those three months. Such amounts are expected to
be at least $231 million.
|
|
|
Delphi-GM
Settlement Agreements
|
As discussed in Note 11, we and Delphi reached agreements
in the three months ended September 30, 2008 with each of
Delphis unions regarding the plan to freeze the benefits
related to the Delphi Hourly-Rate Employee Pension Plan (Delphi
HRP); the cessation by Delphi of OPEB for Delphi hourly
union-represented employees and retirees; and transfers pursuant
to Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Code Section 414(l) of
certain assets and obligations from the Delphi HRP to our U.S.
hourly pension plan. As a result of assuming Delphi OPEB
obligations, we transferred liabilities from our Delphi related
accrual of $2.7 billion. We remeasured certain of our OPEB
plans at September 30, 2008 to include Delphi hourly
employees, the effects of other announced facility idlings in
the U.S., as well as changes in certain actuarial assumptions
that increased our APBO by $1.2 billion. These plans were
remeasured at September 30, 2008 using a weighted average
discount rate of 6.85%, which reflects a 45 basis point increase
from December 31, 2007.
The transfer of certain assets and obligations from the Delphi
HRP to our U.S. hourly pension plan pursuant to IRS Code
Section 414(l) resulted in a decrease in our Delphi related
accrual and an offsetting increase in the PBO of
$2.8 billion, which includes $100 million for our
obligation to provide for up to seven years of credited service
to certain Delphi employees. Accordingly, we remeasured our U.S.
hourly pension plan at September 30, 2008 to include assets
and liabilities of certain employees transferred in accordance
with the Settlement Agreement, our obligation under the Benefit
Guarantee to provide up to seven years of credited service to
Covered Employees, and the effects of other announced facility
idlings in the U.S., as well as changes in certain actuarial
assumptions including a discount rate of 7.10%, which reflects a
40 basis point increase from September 1, 2008. The
remeasurement including the above transfer of certain
obligations resulted in a net increase in the PBO
24
GENERAL
MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
of $1.1 billion from September 1, 2008. We also
experienced actual plan asset losses of $3.9 billion at the
September 30, 2008 remeasurement date since the previous
measurement date of September 1, 2008.
|
|
|
Canada
Facility Idlings and Canadian Auto Workers Union
Negotiations
|
In the three months ended June 30, 2008, we reached an
agreement with the Canadian Auto Workers Union (CAW) (2008 CAW
Agreement) which resulted in increased pension benefits.
Additionally, subsequent to reaching an agreement with the CAW,
we announced our plan to cease production at the Oshawa Truck
Facility (Oshawa) in Canada due to a decrease in consumer demand
for fullsize trucks which triggered a curtailment of the
Canadian hourly and salaried pension plans (Canadian Pension
Plans). Accordingly, we remeasured the Canadian Pension Plans at
May 31, 2008 using a discount rate of 6.0%, which reflects
a 25 basis point increase from December 31, 2007. Also
included in the remeasurement were the effects of other
previously announced facility idlings as well as changes in
certain other actuarial assumptions. In the nine months ended
September 30, 2008, the remeasurements resulted in a
curtailment loss of $177 million in accordance with
SFAS No. 88 related to the Canadian Pension Plans and,
before foreign exchange effects, an increase to the PBO of
$262 million. In addition, we recorded $37 million of
contractual termination benefits in the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 in Automotive cost of sales.
Prior to the 2008 CAW Agreement, we amortized prior service cost
related to our Canadian hourly defined benefit pension plan in
Canada over the remaining service period for active employees at
the time of the amendment, previously estimated to be
10 years. In conjunction with entering into the 2008 CAW
Agreement, we evaluated the 2008 CAW Agreement and the
relationship with the CAW and determined that the contractual
life of the labor agreements is a more appropriate reflection of
the period of future economic benefit received from pension plan
amendments negotiated as part of our collectively bargained
agreement. Therefore, we are amortizing these amounts over three
years. We recorded additional net periodic pension expense of
$334 million in the nine months ended September 30,
2008 related to the accelerated recognition of previously
unamortized prior service costs related to pension increases in
Canada from prior collectively bargained agreements. This
additional expense is primarily related to a change in the
amortization period of existing prior service costs at the time
of the 2008 CAW Agreement. The combined pension related charges
of $548 million were recorded in Automotive cost of sales
in the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
Additionally, we remeasured the Canadian hourly retiree medical
plan at May 31, 2008. The remeasurement reflected the plan
amendment in the 2008 CAW Agreement as well as the announced
capacity reductions and utilized updated actuarial assumptions,
including the discount rate. The discount rate used to determine
the APBO at May 31, 2008 was 6.0%. This reflects a 25 basis
point increase from the discount rate used at December 31,
2007. The remeasurement resulted in an immaterial adjustment to
the APBO and to Net periodic pension and OPEB (income) expense
from continuing operations in the nine months ended
September 30, 2008.
Note 11. Commitments
and Contingencies
We have provided guarantees related to the residual value of
certain operating leases. At September 30, 2008, the
maximum potential amount of future undiscounted payments that we
could be required to pay under these guarantees was
$127 million. These guarantees terminate during years
ranging from 2008 to 2035. Certain leases contain renewal
options. In May 2008, we purchased our headquarters building in
Detroit. Prior to the purchase, we leased the building under an
operating lease and had guaranteed $626 million related to
its residual value. We performed on the guarantee in conjunction
with the acquisition.
We have agreements with third parties that guarantee the
fulfillment of certain suppliers commitments and related
obligations. At September 30, 2008, the maximum potential
future undiscounted payments that we could be required to pay
under these guarantees was $559 million. Included in this
amount is $513 million which relates to a guarantee
provided to
25
GENERAL
MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
GMAC in Brazil in connection with dealer floor plan financing.
This guarantee is secured by a $565 million certificate of
deposit purchased from GMAC to which we have title. These
guarantees expire during years ranging from 2008 to 2017, or
upon the occurrence of specific events, such as a companys
cessation of business. At September 30, 2008 we have
recorded liabilities of $22 million related to these
guarantees.
In some instances, certain assets of the party whose debt or
performance we have guaranteed may offset, to some degree, the
cost of the guarantee. The offset of certain of our payables to
guaranteed parties may also offset certain guarantees, if
triggered.
We also provide payment guarantees on commercial loans made by
GMAC and outstanding with certain third parties, such as dealers
or rental car companies. At September 30, 2008, the maximum
commercial obligations we guaranteed related to these loans was
$110 million, and expire during years ranging from 2008 to
2012. We determined the value ascribed to the guarantees to be
insignificant based on the credit worthiness of the third
parties.
In connection with certain divestitures of assets or operating
businesses, we have entered into agreements indemnifying certain
buyers and other parties with respect to environmental
conditions pertaining to real property we owned. Also, in
connection with such divestitures, we have provided guarantees
with respect to benefits to be paid to former employees relating
to pensions, postretirement health care and life insurance.
Aside from indemnifications and guarantees related to Delphi or
a specific divested unit, both of which are discussed below, it
is not possible to estimate our maximum exposure under these
indemnifications or guarantees due to the conditional nature of
these obligations. No amounts have been recorded for such
obligations as they are not probable and estimable at this time.
In addition to the guarantees and indemnifying agreements
mentioned above, we periodically enter into agreements that
incorporate indemnification provisions in the normal course of
business. Due to the nature of these agreements, the maximum
potential amount of future undiscounted payments to which we may
be exposed cannot be estimated. No amounts have been recorded
for such indemnities as our obligations under them are not
probable and estimable at this time.
Refer to Note 18 for additional information on guarantees
that we provide to GMAC.
Our operations, like operations of other companies engaged in
similar businesses, are subject to a wide range of environmental
protection laws, including laws regulating air emissions, water
discharges, waste management and environmental cleanup. We are
in various stages of investigation or remediation for sites
where contamination has been alleged. We are involved in a
number of remediation actions to clean up hazardous wastes as
required by federal and state laws. Such statutes require that
responsible parties fund remediation actions regardless of
fault, legality of original disposal or ownership of a disposal
site.
The future effect of environmental matters, including potential
liabilities, is often difficult to estimate. We record an
environmental reserve when it is probable that a liability has
been incurred and the amount of the liability can be reasonably
estimated. This practice is followed whether the claims are
asserted or unasserted. We expect that the amounts reserved will
be paid over the periods of remediation for the applicable
sites, which typically range from five to 30 years.
For many sites, the remediation costs and other damages for
which we ultimately may be responsible cannot be reasonably
estimated because of uncertainties with respect to factors such
as our connection to the site or to materials there, the
involvement of other potentially responsible parties, the
application of laws and other standards or regulations, site
conditions, and the nature and scope of investigations, studies
and remediation to be undertaken (including the technologies to
be required and the extent, duration and success of
remediation). As a result, we are unable to determine or
reasonably estimate the amount of costs or other damages for
which we are potentially responsible in connection with these
sites, although that total could be substantial.
26
GENERAL
MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
While the final outcome of environmental matters cannot be
predicted with certainty, it is our opinion that none of these
items, when finally resolved, is expected to have a material
adverse effect on our financial position. However, it is
possible that the resolution of one or more environmental
matters could exceed the amounts accrued in an amount that could
be material to our results of operations in any particular
reporting period.
Like most automobile manufacturers, we have been subject to
asbestos-related claims in recent years. We have seen these
claims primarily arise from three circumstances:
|
|
|
|
|
A majority of these claims seek damages for illnesses alleged to
have resulted from asbestos used in brake components;
|
|
|
Limited numbers of claims have arisen from asbestos contained in
the insulation and brakes used in the manufacturing of
locomotives; and
|
|
|
Claims brought by contractors who allege exposure to
asbestos-containing products while working on premises we owned.
|
While we have resolved many of the asbestos-related cases over
the years and continue to do so for strategic litigation reasons
such as avoiding defense costs and possible exposure to
excessive verdicts, we believe that only a small proportion of
the claimants has or will develop any asbestos-related physical
impairment. Only a small percentage of the claims pending
against us allege causation of a disease associated with
asbestos exposure. The amount expended on asbestos-related
matters in any year depends on the number of claims filed, the
amount of pretrial proceedings and the number of trials and
settlements during the period.
We record the estimated liability associated with asbestos
personal injury claims where the expected loss is both probable
and can reasonably be estimated. In the three months ended
December 31, 2007, we retained Hamilton,
Rabinovitz & Associates, Inc. (HRA), a firm
specializing in estimating asbestos claims to assist us in
determining our potential liability for pending and unasserted
future asbestos personal injury claims. The analysis relies on
and includes the following information and factors:
|
|
|
|
|
A third party forecast of the projected incidence of malignant
asbestos-related disease likely to occur in the general
population of individuals occupationally exposed to asbestos;
|
|
|
Data concerning claims filed against us and resolved, amounts
paid, and the nature of the asbestos-related disease or
condition asserted during approximately the last four years
(Asbestos Claims Experience);
|
|
|
The estimated rate of asbestos-related claims likely to be
asserted against us in the future based on our Asbestos Claims
Experience and the projected incidence of asbestos-related
disease in the general population of individuals occupationally
exposed to asbestos;
|
|
|
The estimated rate of dismissal of claims by disease type based
on our Asbestos Claims Experience; and
|
|
|
The estimated indemnity value of the projected claims based on
our Asbestos Claims Experience, adjusted for inflation.
|
We reviewed a number of factors, including the analysis provided
by HRA and increased our reserve by $349 million in the
three months ended December 31, 2007 to record a reasonable
estimate of our probable liability for pending and future
asbestos-related claims projected to be asserted over the next
ten years, including legal defense costs. We will monitor our
actual claims experience for consistency with this estimate and
make periodic adjustments as appropriate.
We believe that our analysis was based on the most relevant
information available combined with reasonable assumptions, and
that we may prudently rely on its conclusions to determine the
estimated liability for asbestos-related claims. We note,
however, that the analysis is inherently subject to significant
uncertainties. The data sources and assumptions used in
connection with the analysis may not prove to be reliable
predictors with respect to claims asserted against us. Our
experience in the recent past includes substantial variation in
relevant factors, and a change in any of these
assumptions which include the source of the claiming
population, the filing rate and the value of claims
could significantly increase or decrease the estimate. In
27
GENERAL
MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
addition, other external factors such as legislation affecting
the format or timing of litigation, the actions of other
entities sued in asbestos personal injury actions, the
distribution of assets from various trusts established to pay
asbestos claims and the outcome of cases litigated to a final
verdict could affect the estimate.
At September 30, 2008, December 31, 2007 and
September 30, 2007, our liability recorded for
asbestos-related matters was $660 million,
$637 million and $531 million, respectively. The
reserve balance between September 30, 2007 and
December 31, 2007 increased primarily as a result of a
$349 million increase in the reserve for probable pending
and future asbestos claims, which was partially offset by a
reduction in the reserve for existing claims of
$251 million resulting from fewer claims and lower expenses
than previously estimated.
|
|
|
Contingent
Matters Litigation
|
Various legal actions, governmental investigations, claims and
proceedings are pending against us, including a number of
shareholder class actions, bondholder class actions, shareholder
derivative suits and class actions under the U.S. Employee
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (ERISA), and
other matters arising out of alleged product defects, including
asbestos-related claims; employment-related matters;
governmental regulations relating to safety, emissions, and fuel
economy; product warranties; financial services; dealer,
supplier and other contractual relationships and environmental
matters. In certain cases we are the plaintiff or appellant
related to these types of matters.
With regard to the litigation matters discussed in the previous
paragraph, we have established reserves for matters in which we
believe that losses are probable and can be reasonably
estimated. Some of the matters may involve compensatory,
punitive or other treble damage claims or demands for recall
campaigns, incurred but not reported asbestos-related claims,
environmental remediation programs or sanctions, that if
granted, could require us to pay damages or make other
expenditures in amounts that could not be reasonably estimated
at September 30, 2008. We believe that we have
appropriately accrued for such matters in accordance with
SFAS No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies
(SFAS No. 5), or, for matters not requiring accrual,
that such matters will not have a material adverse effect on our
results of operations or financial position based on information
currently available to us. Litigation is inherently
unpredictable, however, and unfavorable resolutions could occur.
Accordingly, it is possible that an adverse outcome from such
proceedings could exceed the amounts accrued in an amount that
could be material to us with respect to our results of
operations in any particular reporting period.
In July 2008 we reached a tentative settlement of the General
Motors Securities Litigation suit and recorded a charge of
$277 million in the nine months ended September 30,
2008. In the three and nine months ended September 30,
2008, we recorded $215 million as a reduction to Selling,
general and administrative expense associated with
insurance-related indemnification proceeds for previously
recorded litigation related costs, including the cost incurred
to settle the General Motors Securities Litigation suit.
Benefit
Guarantee
In 1999, we spun-off Delphi Automotive Systems Corporation
(DASC), which became Delphi. Delphi is our largest supplier of
automotive systems, components and parts, and we are
Delphis largest customer. At the time of the spin-off,
employees of DASC became employees of Delphi. As part of the
separation agreements, Delphi assumed the pension and other
postretirement benefit obligations for these transferred U.S.
hourly employees who retired after October 1, 2000 and we
retained pension and other postretirement obligations for U.S.
hourly employees who retired on or before October 1, 2000.
Additionally at the time of the spin-off, we entered into
separate agreements with the UAW, the IUE-CWA and the United
Steel Workers (USW) (individually, the UAW, IUE-CWA and USW
Benefit Guarantee Agreements and, collectively, the Benefit
Guarantee Agreements) providing contingent benefit guarantees
whereby we would make payments for certain pension benefits and
OPEB to certain former U.S. hourly employees that became
employees of Delphi (Covered Employees). Each Benefit
28
GENERAL
MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Guarantee Agreement contains separate benefit guarantees
relating to pension and OPEB obligations, with different
triggering events. The UAW, IUE-CWA and USW required through the
Benefit Guarantee Agreements that in the event that Delphi or
its successor companies ceases doing business or becomes subject
to financial distress we could be liable if Delphi fails to
provide the corresponding benefits at the required level. The
Benefit Guarantee Agreements do not obligate us to guarantee any
benefits for Delphi retirees in excess of the corresponding
benefits we provide at the time to our own hourly retirees.
Accordingly, any reduction in the benefits we provide our hourly
retirees reduces our obligation under the corresponding benefit
guarantee. In turn, Delphi entered into an agreement
(Indemnification Agreement) with us that required Delphi to
indemnify us if we are required to perform under the UAW Benefit
Guarantee Agreement. In addition, with respect to pension
benefits, our guarantee arises only to the extent that the
pension benefits provided by Delphi and the Pension Benefit
Guaranty Corporation fall short of the guaranteed amount.
We received notice from Delphi, dated October 8, 2005, that
it was more likely than not that we would become obligated to
provide benefits pursuant to the Benefit Guarantee Agreements,
in connection with its commencement on that date of
Chapter 11 proceedings under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. The
notice stated that Delphi was unable to estimate the timing and
scope of any benefits we might be required to provide under the
Benefit Guarantee Agreements but did not trigger the Benefit
Guarantee Agreements; however, in 2005, we believed it was
probable that we had incurred a liability under the Benefit
Guarantee Agreements.
In June 2007 we entered into a Memorandum of Understanding with
Delphi and the UAW (Delphi UAW MOU) that included terms relating
to the consensual triggering of the UAW Benefit Guarantee
Agreement as well as additional terms relating to Delphis
restructuring. Under the Delphi UAW MOU we also agreed to pay
for certain healthcare costs of Delphi retirees and their
beneficiaries in order to provide a level of benefits consistent
with those provided to our retirees and their beneficiaries from
the Mitigation Plan. We also committed to pay $450 million
to settle a UAW claim asserted against Delphi, which the UAW has
directed us to pay directly to either the Mitigation Plan or New
VEBA, depending upon the timing of the payment. This amount is
to be paid upon substantial consummation of a Delphi POR
consistent with the Delphi UAW MOU and the Delphi-GM Settlement
Agreements, as defined below. In August 2007, we entered into a
Memorandum of Understanding with Delphi and the IUE-CWA (Delphi
IUE-CWA MOU), and we entered into two separate Memoranda of
Understanding with Delphi and the USW (collectively the USW
MOUs). The terms of the Delphi IUE-CWA MOU and the USW MOUs are
similar to the Delphi UAW MOU with regard to the consensual
triggering of the Benefit Guarantee Agreements.
Delphi-GM
Settlement Agreements
In September 2007, as amended in October and December, 2007, we
entered into comprehensive settlement agreements with Delphi
(Delphi-GM Settlement Agreements) consisting of a Global
Settlement Agreement, as amended (GSA) and a Master
Restructuring Agreement, as amended (MRA). The GSA was intended
to resolve outstanding issues between Delphi and us that have
arisen or may arise before Delphis emergence from
Chapter 11. The MRA was intended to govern certain aspects
of our ongoing commercial relationship with Delphi. The
memoranda of understanding discussed in the preceding paragraph
were incorporated into these agreements.
On September 12, 2008 we amended the terms of the GSA
(Amended GSA) and MRA (Amended MRA) (collectively, Amended
Delphi-GM Settlement Agreements). On September 26, 2008,
the United States District Court for the Southern District of
New York entered an order approving the implementation of the
Amended Delphi-GM Settlement Agreements which then became
effective on September 29, 2008. In connection with the
Amended GSA, we and Delphi reached agreements with each of
Delphis unions regarding the plan to freeze benefits
related to the Delphi HRP, the cessation by Delphi of OPEB for
Delphi hourly union represented employees and retirees,
transfers pursuant to IRS Code Section 414(l) of net
liabilities from the Delphi HRP to our U.S. hourly pension plan,
and the release by the unions, their members and their retirees
of Delphi and us from claims related to such matters.
29
GENERAL
MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
In addition, the more significant items contained in the Amended
Delphi-GM Settlement Agreements include our commitment to:
|
|
|
|
|
Reimburse Delphi for its costs to provide OPEB to certain of
Delphis hourly retirees from December 31, 2006
through the date that Delphi ceases to provide such benefits and
will assume responsibility for OPEB going forward;
|
|
|
Reimburse Delphi for the normal cost of credited
service in Delphis pension plan between January 1,
2007 and the date its pension plans are frozen;
|
|
|
Transfer, under IRS Code Section 414(l), $2.1 billion
of net liabilities from the Delphi HRP to our U.S. hourly
pension plan on September 29, 2008 (First Hourly Pension
Transfer) and the remaining net liabilities, which are estimated
to be $1.3 billion at September 30, 2008, upon
Delphis substantial consummation of its POR consistent
with the Amended Delphi-GM Settlement Agreements (Second Hourly
Pension Transfer). Actual amounts of the Second Hourly Pension
Transfer will depend on, among other factors, the valuation of
the pension liability at transfer date and performance of
pension plan assets;
|
|
|
Reimburse Delphi for all retirement incentives and half of the
buyout payments made pursuant to the various attrition program
provisions and to reimburse certain U.S. hourly buydown payments
made to certain hourly employees of Delphi;
|
|
|
Award certain future product programs to Delphi, provide Delphi
with ongoing preferential sourcing for other product programs,
eliminate certain previously agreed upon price reductions, and
restrict our ability to re-source certain production to
alternative suppliers;
|
|
|
Reimburse certain U.S. hourly labor costs incurred to produce
systems, components and parts for us from October 1, 2006
through September 14, 2015 at certain U.S. facilities owned
or to be divested by Delphi (Labor Cost Subsidy);
|
|
|
Reimburse Delphis cash flow deficiency attributable to
production at certain U.S. facilities that continue to produce
systems, components and parts for us until the facilities are
either closed or sold by Delphi (Production Cash Burn Support);
|
|
|
Pay Delphi $110 million in both 2009 and 2010 in quarterly
installments in connection with certain U.S. facilities owned by
Delphi (Facilitation Support);
|
|
|
Temporarily accelerate payment terms for Delphis North
American sales to us upon substantial consummation of its POR,
until 2012;
|
|
|
Beginning January 1, 2009, reimburse Delphi for actual cash
payments related to workers compensation, disability,
supplemental employment benefits and severance obligations for
all current and former UAW-represented hourly active and
inactive employees; and
|
|
|
Guarantee a minimum recovery of the net working capital that
Delphi has invested in certain businesses held for sale.
|
Delphi agreed to provide us or our designee with an option to
purchase all or any of certain Delphi businesses for one dollar
if such businesses have not been sold by certain specified
deadlines. If such a business is not sold either to a third
party or to us or any affiliate pursuant to the option by the
applicable deadline, we (or at our option, an affiliate) will be
deemed to have exercised the purchase option, and the unsold
business, including materially all of its assets and
liabilities, will automatically transfer to the GM
buyer. Similarly, under the Delphi UAW MOU if such a
transfer has not occurred by the applicable deadline,
responsibility for the affected UAW hourly employees of such an
unsold business would automatically transfer to us or our
designated affiliate. Upon emergence, Delphi also agreed to
provide us with the right to access and operate four Delphi U.S.
manufacturing facilities under certain circumstances.
The Amended GSA also resolves all claims in existence as of the
effective date of the Amended Delphi-GM Settlement Agreements
(with certain limited exceptions) that either Delphi or we have
or may have against the other, including Delphis motion in
March 2006 under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code to reject certain
supply contracts with us. The Amended GSA and related agreements
with Delphis unions releases us and our related parties,
as defined, from any claims of Delphi and its related parties,
as defined, as well as any employee benefit related claims of
Delphis unions and hourly employees. Also pursuant to the
Amended GSA, we have released Delphi and its related parties, as
defined, from claims by us or our related parties, as defined.
30
GENERAL
MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Additionally, the Amended GSA provides that we will receive:
|
|
|
|
|
An administrative claim regarding the First Hourly Pension
Transfer of $1.6 billion, of which we will share equally
with the general unsecured creditors up to only the first
$600 million in recoveries in the event Delphi does not
emerge from bankruptcy;
|
|
|
An administrative claim for $2.1 billion for the total
Delphi HRP transfer (inclusive of the administrative claim for
the First Hourly Pension Transfer) to be paid in preferred stock
upon substantial consummation of Delphis POR in which
Delphi emerges with: (1) its principal core businesses;
(2) exit financing that does not exceed $3.0 billion
(plus a revolving credit facility); and (3) equity
securities that are not senior to or pari passu with the
preferred stock issued to us; and
|
|
|
A general unsecured claim in the amount of $2.5 billion
that is subordinated until general unsecured creditors receive
recoveries equal to 20% of their general unsecured claims after
which we will receive 20% of our general unsecured claim in
preferred stock, with any further recovery shared ratably
between us and general unsecured creditors.
|
The ultimate value of any consideration that we may receive is
contingent on the fair market value of Delphis assets in
the event Delphi fails to emerge from bankruptcy or upon the
fair market value of Delphis securities if Delphi emerges
from bankruptcy.
As a result of the implementation of the Amended Delphi-GM
Settlement Agreements, we paid $1.2 billion to Delphi in
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 in
settlement of the amounts accrued to date against our
commitments.
Delphi
POR
The Bankruptcy Court entered an order on January 25, 2008
confirming Delphis POR. On April 4, 2008, Delphi
announced that although it had met the conditions required to
substantially consummate its POR, including obtaining
$6.1 billion in exit financing, Delphis plan
investors refused to participate in the closing of the
transaction contemplated by the POR, which was commenced but not
completed because of the plan investors position. We
continued to work with Delphi and its stakeholders to facilitate
Delphis efforts to emerge from bankruptcy, including the
implementation of the Amended Delphi-GM Settlement Agreements.
On October 3, 2008 Delphi filed a modified POR, which
contemplates Delphi obtaining $3.8 billion in exit
financing to consummate its modified POR. Given the current
credit markets and the challenges facing the automotive
industry, there can be no assurance that Delphi will be
successful in obtaining $3.8 billion in exit financing to
emerge from bankruptcy.
In May 2008, we agreed to advance up to $650 million to
Delphi in 2008, which is within the amounts we would have owed
under the Delphi-GM Settlement Agreements had Delphi emerged
from bankruptcy in April 2008. In August 2008 we entered into a
new agreement to advance up to an additional $300 million.
This increased the amount we could advance to $950 million
in 2008, which is within the amounts we would owe under the
Delphi-GM Settlement Agreements if Delphi was to emerge from
bankruptcy in December 2008. Upon the effectiveness of the
Amended Delphi-GM Settlement Agreements, the original
$650 million advance agreement matured, leaving a
$300 million advance agreement. At September 30, 2008,
no amounts were outstanding under our advance agreement with
Delphi. Further, in October 2008, subject to Delphi obtaining an
extension or other accommodation of its
Debtor-in-Possession
(DIP) financing through June 30, 2009, we agreed to extend
the $300 million advance agreement through June 30,
2009 and to temporarily accelerate our North American payables
to Delphi in the three months ending June 30, 2009, which
is expected to result in additional liquidity to Delphi of
$100 million in each of April, May and June of 2009. The
potential temporary acceleration of payment terms, which was to
occur upon substantial consummation of Delphis POR under
the Amended Delphi-GM Settlement Agreements, is also subject to
Delphis actual liquidity requirements.
In the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, we
recorded charges in Other expenses of $652 million and
$4.1 billion, respectively, and charges in Automotive cost
of sales of $105 million and $444 million,
respectively. In the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2007, we recorded charges in Other expenses
of $350 million and $925 million, respectively. These
charges reflect our best estimate of our obligations associated
with the Benefit Guarantee Agreements and
31
GENERAL
MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
other amounts due under the Amended Delphi-GM Settlement
Agreements. The charge recorded in the three months ended
September 30, 2008 reflects our estimated obligations under
the Amended Delphi-GM Settlement Agreements, net of estimated
recoveries, updated to reflect current conditions related to the
credit markets and challenges in the auto industry. In addition,
the charge reflects a benefit of $622 million due to a
reduction in our estimated liability associated with Delphi OPEB
related costs for Delphi active employees and retirees, based on
the terms of the New VEBA as discussed in Note 10, who were
not previously participants in our plans. Changes in the
estimated OPEB liability for these individuals were recognized
in earnings. The terms of the New VEBA also reduced our
$3.6 billion OPEB obligation for Delphi employees who
flowed back to us and became participants in the UAW hourly
medical plan primarily in 2006, however, that benefit is
included in the actuarial gain recorded in our UAW hourly
medical plan as discussed in Note 10.
Since 2005, we have recorded total charges of $11.7 billion
in Other expenses in connection with the Benefit Guarantee
Agreements and Amended Delphi-GM Settlement Agreements which, at
September 30, 2008, reflects an estimate of no recovery for
our unsecured bankruptcy claims. Our commitments under the
Amended Delphi-GM Settlement Agreements for workers
compensation, disability, and supplemental employment benefits
are included in the amounts recorded in Other expenses. In
addition, our commitment for the Labor Cost Subsidy, Production
Cash Burn Support and Facilitation Support in the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2008 are included in the amounts
recorded in Automotive cost of sales and are expected to result
in additional expense of between $250 million and
$400 million annually in 2009 through 2015, which will be
treated as a period cost and expensed as incurred. Due to the
uncertainties surrounding Delphis ability to emerge from
bankruptcy it is reasonably possible that additional losses,
which may be substantial, could arise in the future, but we
currently are unable to estimate the amount or range of such
losses, if any.
|
|
|
Benefit
Guarantees Related to Divested Facilities
|
We have entered into various guarantees regarding benefits for
our former employees at two previously divested facilities that
manufacture component parts whose results continue to be
included in our consolidated financial statements in accordance
with FIN No. 46(R), Consolidation of Variable
Interest Entities an interpretation of ARB
No. 51 (FIN No. 46(R)). For these divested
facilities, we entered into agreements with both of the
purchasers to indemnify, defend and hold each purchaser harmless
for any liabilities arising out of the divested facilities and
with the UAW guaranteeing certain postretirement health care
benefits and payment of postemployment benefits.
In 2007, we recognized favorable adjustments of $44 million
related to these facility idlings, in addition to a
$38 million curtailment gain with respect to OPEB.
Note 12. Income
Taxes
In accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion
No. 28, Interim Financial Reporting (APB
No. 28), we adjust our effective tax rate each quarter to
be consistent with the estimated annual effective tax rate. We
also record the tax effect of unusual or infrequently occurring
discrete items including changes in judgment about valuation
allowances and effects of changes in tax laws or rates, in the
interim period in which they occur. In addition, jurisdictions
with a projected loss for the year or a year to date loss where
no tax benefit can be recognized are excluded from the estimated
annual effective tax rate. The effect of such an exclusion could
result in a higher or lower effective tax rate during a
particular quarter, based upon the mix and timing of actual
earnings versus annual projections.
We have established valuation allowances for deferred tax assets
based on a more likely than not threshold. Our
ability to realize our deferred tax assets depends on our
ability to generate sufficient taxable income within the
carryback or carryforward
32
GENERAL
MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
periods provided for in the tax law for each applicable tax
jurisdiction. We consider the following possible sources of
taxable income when assessing the realization of our deferred
tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
Future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences;
|
|
|
Future taxable income exclusive of reversing temporary
differences and carryforwards;
|
|
|
Taxable income in prior carryback years; and
|
|
|
Tax-planning strategies.
|
Concluding that a valuation allowance is not required is
difficult when there is significant negative evidence which is
objective and verifiable, such as cumulative losses in recent
years. We utilize a rolling three years of actual and current
year anticipated results as our primary measure of our
cumulative losses in recent years. However, because a
substantial portion of those cumulative losses relate to various
non-recurring matters and the implementation of our North
American Turnaround Plan, we adjust those three-year cumulative
results for the effect of these items. The analysis performed in
the three months ended September 30, 2007 and
March 31, 2008 indicated that in Canada, Germany, the
United Kingdom and the United States, we had cumulative
three-year losses on an adjusted basis. In Spain, we anticipated
being in a cumulative three-year loss position in the near-term.
This was considered significant negative evidence that is
objective and verifiable and therefore, difficult to overcome.
In addition our near-term financial outlook in these
jurisdictions had deteriorated. Furthermore, as it relates to
our assessment in the United States, many factors in our
evaluation are not within our control, particularly:
|
|
|
|
|
The possibility for continued or increasing price competition in
the highly competitive U.S. market;
|
|
|
Volatile fuel prices and the effect that may have on consumer
preferences related to our most profitable products, fullsize
pick-up
trucks and sport utility vehicles;
|
|
|
Uncertainty over the effect on our cost structure from more
stringent U.S. fuel economy and global emissions standards which
may require us to sell a significant volume of alternative fuel
vehicles across our portfolio;
|
|
|
Uncertainty as to the future operating results of GMAC; and
|
|
|
Turmoil in the mortgage and credit markets and continued
reductions in housing values.
|
Accordingly, in the three months ended September 30, 2007,
we concluded that the objectively verifiable negative evidence
of our historical losses combined with our challenging near-term
outlook out-weighed other factors and that it was more likely
than not that we would not generate sufficient taxable income to
realize our net deferred tax assets, in whole or in part in
Canada, Germany and the United States. As such, we recorded full
valuation allowances against our net deferred tax assets in
Canada, Germany and the United States of $39.0 billion in
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007.
In the three months ended March 31, 2008, we determined
that it was more likely than not that we would not realize our
net deferred tax assets, in whole or in part, in Spain and the
United Kingdom and recorded full valuation allowances of
$379 million against our net deferred tax assets in these
tax jurisdictions. The following summarizes the significant
changes occurring in the three months ended March 31, 2008,
which resulted in our decision to record these full valuation
allowances.
In the United Kingdom, we were in a three-year adjusted
cumulative loss position and our near-term and mid-term
financial outlook for automotive market conditions was more
challenging than we believed in the three months ended
December 31, 2007. Our outlook deteriorated based on our
projections of the combined effects of the challenging foreign
exchange environment and unfavorable commodity prices.
Additionally, we increased our estimate of the potential costs
that may arise from the regulatory and tax environment relating
to carbon dioxide
(CO2)
emissions in the European Union, including legislation enacted
or announced in 2008.
In Spain, although we were not in a three-year adjusted
cumulative loss position our near-term and mid-term financial
outlook deteriorated significantly in the three months ended
March 31, 2008 such that we anticipated being in a
three-year adjusted cumulative loss position in the near- and
mid-term. In Spain, as in the United Kingdom, our outlook
deteriorated based on our projections of the combined effects of
the foreign exchange environment and commodity prices, including
our estimate of the potential costs that may arise from the
regulatory and tax environment relating to
CO2
emissions.
33
GENERAL
MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
We currently have recorded full valuation allowances against our
net deferred tax assets in Brazil. Such valuation allowances
were initially recorded in 2005. In 2006, 2007 and in the nine
months ended September 30, 2008, we generated taxable
income in Brazil and accordingly, had reversed a portion of that
valuation allowance to offset the tax provision for income
earned in those periods. It is reasonably possible that our
Brazilian operations will generate taxable income in 2008 and
may show a forecast of future taxable income at that time, which
may result in a change in our judgment regarding the need for a
full valuation allowance in Brazil. However, global economic
conditions have become increasingly unstable and it is not
possible to objectively verify this information at
September 30, 2008. Accordingly, we have continued to
conclude that it is more likely than not that we will not
realize our net deferred tax assets in Brazil.
If, in the future, we generate taxable income in Brazil, Canada,
Germany, Spain, the United Kingdom, the United States or other
tax jurisdictions where we have recorded full valuation
allowances on a sustained basis, our conclusion regarding the
need for valuation allowances in these tax jurisdictions could
change, resulting in the reversal of some or all of such
valuation allowances. If our Canadian, German, Spanish, United
Kingdom, U.S. or operations in other tax jurisdictions generate
taxable income prior to reaching profitability on a sustained
basis, we would reverse a portion of the valuation allowance
related to the corresponding realized tax benefit for that
period, without changing our conclusions on the need for a full
valuation allowance against the remaining net deferred tax
assets.
In the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 we
recognized income tax expense on Loss from continuing operations
before income taxes, equity income and minority interests due to
the effect of no longer recording tax benefits for losses
incurred in Canada, Germany, Spain, the United Kingdom and the
United States, unless offset by pretax income from other than
continuing operations, based on the valuation allowances
established in the three months ended September 30, 2007
and March 31, 2008, as disclosed in our 2007
Form 10-K
and Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the three months ended March 31, 2008, respectively.
|
|
|
Tax
Examinations and Uncertain Tax Positions
|
At September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the
amount of consolidated gross unrecognized tax benefits before
valuation allowances was $3.1 billion and
$2.8 billion, respectively, and the amounts that would
favorably affect the effective income tax rate in future periods
after valuation allowances were $265 million and
$68 million, respectively. The increase in the amounts that
would favorably affect the effective tax rate is primarily
related to adjustments resulting from our annual review of
intercompany transfer pricing arrangements. At
September 30, 2007, the amounts of gross unrecognized tax
benefits before valuation allowances and the amount that would
favorably affect the effective income tax rate in future periods
after valuation allowances were $2.5 billion and
$50 million, respectively. These amounts consider the
guidance in FSP
No. FIN 48-1,
Definition of Settlement in FASB Interpretation
No. 48 (FSP
No. FIN 48-1).
At September 30, 2008, $2.2 billion of the liability
for uncertain tax positions is netted against deferred tax
assets relating to the same tax jurisdictions. The remainder of
the liability for uncertain tax positions is classified as a
non-current liability.
We file income tax returns in multiple jurisdictions and are
subject to examination by taxing authorities throughout the
world. In the U.S., our federal income tax returns for 2001
through 2003 have been reviewed by the IRS, and except for one
transfer pricing matter, this examination is expected to
conclude in 2008. We have submitted requests for Competent
Authority assistance on the transfer pricing matter. Competent
authorities interpret the implementation of treaties to achieve
the effect of eliminating double taxation. The IRS is currently
reviewing our 2004 through 2006 federal income tax returns. In
addition, our previously filed tax returns are currently under
review in Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Canada, Ecuador,
France, Germany, Hungary, India, Indonesia, Italy, Korea,
Mexico, New Zealand, Russia, Spain, Switzerland, Taiwan,
Thailand, Turkey, the United Kingdom and Venezuela. It is
reasonably possible that the reviews of our previously filed tax
returns in Korea will conclude in the three months ended
December 31, 2008 and it is possible that we will be
required to make cash payments as part of this settlement. Tax
audits in Greece, Mexico, the United Kingdom and certain U.S.
states concluded in 2008. The conclusion of these audits
resulted in the release of amounts accrued for interest and
penalties of $62 million and $23 million,
respectively, in the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
At September 30, 2008 it is not possible to reasonably
estimate the expected change to the total amount of unrecognized
tax benefits over the next twelve months.
34
GENERAL
MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
We have open tax years from 1999 to 2007 with various
significant taxing jurisdictions including the U.S., Australia,
Canada, Mexico, Germany, the United Kingdom, Korea and Brazil.
These open years contain matters that could be subject to
differing interpretations of applicable tax laws and regulations
as they relate to the amount, timing or inclusion of revenue and
expenses or the sustainability of income tax credits for a given
audit cycle. We have recorded a tax benefit only for those
positions that meet the more likely than not standard.
Note 13. Fair
Value Measurements
In September 2006 the FASB issued SFAS No. 157 and in
February 2007 issued SFAS No. 159. Both standards
address aspects of the expanding application of fair value
accounting. Effective January 1, 2008, we adopted
SFAS No. 157 and SFAS No. 159. In accordance
with the provisions of FSP
No. FAS 157-2,
we have decided to defer adoption of SFAS No. 157 for
one year for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities
that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial
statements on a nonrecurring basis. There was no adjustment to
Accumulated deficit as a result of our adoption of
SFAS No. 157. SFAS No. 159 permits a company
to measure certain financial assets and financial liabilities at
fair value that were not previously required to be measured at
fair value. We have not elected to measure any financial assets
or financial liabilities at fair value which were not previously
required to be measured at fair value.
SFAS No. 157 provides for the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell
an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly
transaction between market participants at the measurement date,
and establishes a framework for measuring fair value;
|
|
|
Establishes a three-level hierarchy for fair value measurements
based upon the observable inputs to the valuation of an asset or
liability at the measurement date;
|
|
|
Requires consideration of our nonperformance risk when valuing
liabilities; and
|
|
|
Expands disclosures about instruments measured at fair value.
|
SFAS No. 157 also establishes a three-level valuation
hierarchy for fair value measurements. These valuation
techniques are based upon observable and unobservable inputs.
Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent
sources, while unobservable inputs reflect our market
assumptions. These two types of inputs create the following fair
value hierarchy:
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1Quoted prices for identical instruments
in active markets;
|
|
|
Level 2Quoted prices for similar instruments
in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar
instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived
valuations whose significant inputs are observable: and
|
|
|
Level 3Instruments whose significant inputs are
unobservable.
|
Following is a description of the valuation methodologies we
used for instruments measured at fair value, as well as the
general classification of such instruments pursuant to the
valuation hierarchy.
We classify our securities within Level 1 of the valuation
hierarchy where quoted prices are available in an active market.
Level 1 securities include exchange-traded equities. We
generally classify our securities within Level 2 of the
valuation hierarchy where quoted market prices are not
available. If quoted market prices are not available, we
determine the fair values of our securities using pricing
models, quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics
or discounted cash flow models. These models are primarily
industry-standard models that consider various assumptions,
including time value and yield curve as well as other relevant
economic measures. Examples of such securities include U. S.
government and agency securities, certificates of deposit,
commercial paper, and corporate debt securities. We classify our
securities within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy in
certain cases where there is limited activity or less observable
inputs to the valuation. Inputs to the Level 3 security
fair value measurements consider various assumptions, including
time value, yield curve, prepayment speeds, default rates, loss
severity, current market and contractual prices for underlying
financial instruments as well as other relevant economic
measures. Securities classified within Level 3 include
certain mortgage-backed securities and other securities.
35
GENERAL
MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
The majority of our derivatives are valued using internal models
that use as their basis readily observable market inputs, such
as time value, forward interest rates, volatility factors, and
current and forward market prices for commodities and foreign
exchange rates. We generally classify these instruments within
Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy. Such derivatives
include interest rate swaps, cross currency swaps, foreign
currency derivatives and commodity derivatives. We classify
derivative contracts that are valued based upon models with
significant unobservable market inputs as Level 3 of the
valuation hierarchy. Examples include certain long-dated
commodity derivatives and interest rate swaps with notional
amounts that fluctuate over time. Models for these fair value
measurements include unobservable inputs based on estimated
forward rates and prepayment speeds.
SFAS No. 157 requires that the valuation of derivative
liabilities must take into account the companys own
nonperformance risk. Effective January 1, 2008, we updated
our derivative liability valuation methodology to consider our
own nonperformance risk as observed through the credit default
swap market and bond market and based on prices for recent
trades. Subsequent to September 30, 2008, credit market
volatility increased significantly, creating broad credit market
concerns. If this condition persists, it will affect our ability
to manage risks related to market changes in foreign currency
exchange rates, interest rates and commodity prices to which we
are exposed in the ordinary course of our business as some
derivative counterparties have been and may be unwilling to
enter into transactions with us due to our credit rating.
The following table summarizes the financial instruments
measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements on a Recurring Basis at September 30,
2008
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
$
|
317
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
338
|
|
United States government and agency
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
401
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
401
|
|
Mortgage-backed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,507
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,507
|
|
Commercial paper
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,490
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,490
|
|
Corporate debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
Derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cross currency swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
Foreign currency derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
566
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
566
|
|
Commodity derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$
|
317
|
|
|
$
|
12,303
|
|
|
$
|
123
|
|
|
$
|
12,743
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cross currency swaps
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
155
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
155
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
Foreign currency derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,448
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,448
|
|
Commodity derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
757
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
791
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,403
|
|
|
$
|
37
|
|
|
$
|
3,440
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36
GENERAL
MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
The tables below summarize the activity in our balance sheet
accounts for financial instruments classified within
Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy. When a determination is
made to classify a financial instrument within Level 3, the
determination is based upon the significance of the unobservable
inputs to the overall fair value measurement. Level 3
financial instruments typically include, in addition to the
unobservable or Level 3 components, observable components
which are validated to external sources.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3 Financial Assets and Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed
|
|
|
Interest Rate
|
|
|
Derivatives,
|
|
|
Corporate Debt
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total Net
|
|
|
|
Securities(a)
|
|
|
Swaps, Net
|
|
|
Net(b)
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Securities(a)
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
248
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
341
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
234
|
|
|
$
|
823
|
|
Total realized/unrealized gains (losses):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(103
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
(166
|
)
|
Included in other comprehensive income
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Purchases, issuances, and settlements
|
|
|
(146
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(251
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(173
|
)
|
|
|
(570
|
)
|
Transfer in
and/or out
of Level 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
79
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(13
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
86
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of total gains and (losses) for the period included in
earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains or
(losses) relating to assets still held at the reporting date
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(103
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(103
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Realized gains (losses) on marketable securities are recorded in
Automotive interest and other non-operating income, net. |
(b) |
|
Realized and unrealized gains (losses) on commodity derivatives
are recorded in Automotive cost of sales and changes in fair
value are attributable to changes in base metal and precious
metal prices. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3 Financial Assets and Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed
|
|
|
Interest Rate
|
|
|
Derivatives,
|
|
|
Corporate Debt
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total Net
|
|
|
|
Securities(a)
|
|
|
Swaps, Net(b)
|
|
|
Net(c)
|
|
|
Securities(a)
|
|
|
Securities(a)
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
283
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
257
|
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
|
$
|
258
|
|
|
$
|
828
|
|
Total realized/unrealized gains (losses):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
Included in other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Purchases, issuances, and settlements
|
|
|
(173
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(301
|
)
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
(181
|
)
|
|
|
(708
|
)
|
Transfer in
and/or out
of Level 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
79
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(13
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
86
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of total gains and (losses) for the period included in
earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains or
(losses) relating to assets still held at the reporting date
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
31
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
GENERAL
MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Realized gains (losses) and other than temporary impairments on
marketable securities are recorded in Automotive interest and
other non-operating income, net. |
(b) |
|
Reflects fair value of interest rate swap assets, net of
liabilities. |
(c) |
|
Realized and unrealized gains (losses) on commodity derivatives
are recorded in Automotive cost of sales. Changes in fair value
are attributable to changes in base metal and precious metal
prices. |
Unrealized securities holding gains and losses are excluded from
earnings and reported in Other comprehensive income until
realized. Gains and losses are not realized until an instrument
is settled or sold. On a monthly basis, we evaluate whether
unrealized losses related to investments in debt and equity
securities are other than temporary. Factors considered in
determining whether a loss is other than temporary include the
length of time and extent to which the fair value has been below
cost, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the
issuer and our ability and intent to hold the investment for a
period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery.
If losses are determined to be other than temporary, the loss is
recognized and the investment carrying amount is adjusted to a
revised fair value. Other than temporary impairment losses of
$29 million were recorded in the nine months ended
September 30, 2008. There were no other than temporary
impairment losses recorded in the three months ended
September 30, 2008.
The following table summarizes the financial instruments
measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in periods
subsequent to initial recognition:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets
|
|
|
Significant Other
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Identical
|
|
|
Observable
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
Total Losses
|
|
|
Total Losses
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in GMAC Common Membership Interests
|
|
$
|
1,949
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,949
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(2,036
|
)
|
Investment in GMAC Preferred Membership Interests
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
(251
|
)
|
|
|
(1,001
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,992
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,992
|
|
|
$
|
(251
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,037
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In accordance with the provisions of APB No. 18, The
Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common
Stock (APB No. 18), we review the carrying values of
our investments when events and circumstances warrant. This
review requires the comparison of the fair values of our
investments to their respective carrying values. The fair value
of our investments is determined based on valuation techniques
using the best information that is available, and may include
quoted market prices, market comparables, and discounted cash
flow projections. An impairment charge would be recorded
whenever a decline in fair value below the carrying value is
determined to be other than temporary.
At December 31, 2007 we disclosed that we did not believe
our investment in GMAC was impaired; however, there were many
economic factors which were unstable at that time. Such factors
included the instability of the global credit and mortgage
markets, deteriorating conditions in the residential and home
building markets, and credit downgrades of GMAC and GMACs
subsidiary, Residential Capital, LLC (ResCap).
Through June 30, 2008 the economic factors mentioned above
deteriorated beyond our previous expectations. The instability
in the global credit and mortgage markets increased in North
America and spread throughout Europe, and the
38
GENERAL
MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
residential and home building markets continued to deteriorate
in both continents. These factors were exacerbated by the
volatility in the cost of fuel, which led to a decline in
consumer demand for automobiles, particularly fullsize
pick-up
trucks and sport utility vehicles. This negatively affected
GMACs North American automotive business, as the decline
in certain residual values resulted in an impairment of vehicles
on operating leases, and an overall decline in automotive sales
resulted in a decline in the leasing and financing of vehicles.
In the three months ended September 30, 2008 the
instability of the financial and credit markets intensified in
North America and Europe and resulted in an extreme lack of
liquidity in the global credit markets resulting in prominent
North American financial institutions declaring bankruptcy,
being seized by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
(FDIC), or being sold at distressed valuations.
These economic factors negatively affected GMACs North
American automotive business as well as ResCaps
residential mortgage business, which resulted in significant
losses for both GMACs North American automotive operations
and ResCap. Additionally, it was necessary for GMAC to continue
to provide support to ResCap, and GMACs and ResCaps
credit ratings were each further downgraded several times.
In the three month periods ended March 31 and June 30,
2008, we determined that our investment in GMAC Common
Membership Interests was impaired and in the three month periods
ended March 31, June 30 and September 30, 2008
that our investment in GMAC Preferred Membership Interests was
impaired and that such impairments were other than temporary.
The following table summarizes the impairment charges we have
recorded against our investment in GMAC Common and Preferred
Membership Interests:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
GMAC Common Membership Interests
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,036
|
|
GMAC Preferred Membership Interests
|
|
|
251
|
|
|
|
1,001
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
251
|
|
|
$
|
3,037
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
GENERAL
MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
The following table summarizes the activity with respect to our
investment in GMAC Common and Preferred Membership Interests:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMAC Common
|
|
|
GMAC Preferred
|
|
|
|
Membership Interests
|
|
|
Membership Interests
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2008
|
|
$
|
7,079
|
|
|
$
|
1,044
|
|
Our proportionate share of GMACs losses
|
|
|
(302
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment charges
|
|
|
(1,310
|
)
|
|
|
(142
|
)
|
Other, primarily Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
(76
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2008
|
|
|
5,391
|
|
|
|
902
|
|
Our proportionate share of GMACs losses
|
|
|
(1,204
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment charges
|
|
|
(726
|
)
|
|
|
(608
|
)
|
Other, primarily Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2008
|
|
|
3,454
|
|
|
|
294
|
|
Our proportionate share of GMACs losses
|
|
|
(1,235
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(251
|
)
|
Other, primarily Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
(270
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
1,949
|
|
|
$
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment charges are recorded in Equity in loss of GMAC LLC
and Automotive interest income and other non-operating income,
net for our investment in GMAC Common and Preferred Membership
Interests, respectively.
Continued low or decreased demand for automobiles, continued or
increased instability of the global credit and mortgage markets,
the lack of available credit, or a recession in North America,
Europe, South America or Asia could further negatively affect
GMACs lines of business, and result in future impairments
of our investment in GMAC Common and Preferred Membership
Interests. Additionally, as GMAC provides financing to our
dealers as well as retail purchasers of our vehicles, further
deterioration in these economic factors could cause our vehicle
sales to decline.
In order to determine the fair value of our investment in GMAC
Common Membership Interests, we first determined a fair value of
GMAC by applying various valuation techniques to its significant
business units, and then applied our 49% equity interest to the
resulting fair value. Our determination of the fair value of
GMAC encompassed applying valuation techniques, which included
Level 3 inputs, to GMACs significant business units
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Auto Finance We obtained industry data, such as
equity and earnings ratios for other industry participants, and
developed average multiples for these companies based upon a
comparison of their businesses to Auto Finance.
|
|
|
Insurance We developed a peer group, based upon such
factors as equity and earnings ratios and developed average
multiples for these companies.
|
|
|
ResCap We previously obtained industry data for an
industry participant who we believe to be comparable, and also
utilized the implied valuation based on an acquisition of an
industry participant who we believe to be comparable. Due to
prevailing market conditions at September 30, 2008 we do
not believe that comparable industry participants exist;
however, we believe that previous data used, in conjunction with
certain publicly available information incorporated into our
analysis, results in an appropriate valuation at
September 30, 2008.
|
|
|
Commercial Finance Group We obtained industry data,
such as price and earnings ratios, for other industry
participants, and developed average multiples for these
companies based upon a comparison of their businesses to the
Commercial Finance Group.
|
40
GENERAL
MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
In order to determine the fair value of our investment in GMAC
Preferred Membership Interests, we applied valuation techniques,
which included Level 3 inputs, to various characteristics
of the GMAC Preferred Membership Interests as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Utilizing information as to the pricing on similar investments
and changes in yields of other GMAC securities, we developed a
discount rate for the valuation.
|
|
|
Utilizing assumptions as to the receipt of dividends on the GMAC
Preferred Membership Interests, the expected call date and a
discounted cash flow model, we developed a present value of the
related cash flows.
|
At June 30 and September 30, 2008 we adjusted our
assumptions as to the appropriate discount rate to utilize in
the valuation due to the changes in the market conditions which
occurred in these periods. Additionally, we adjusted our
assumptions as to the likelihood of payments of dividends and
expected call date of the Preferred Membership Interests.
Note 14. GMNA
Postemployment Benefit Costs
As previously discussed in our 2007
10-K, the
majority of our hourly employees working within GMNA are
represented by various labor unions. We have specific labor
contracts with each union, some of which require us to pay idled
employees certain wage and benefit costs. Costs to idle,
consolidate or close facilities and provide postemployment
benefits to employees idled on an other than temporary basis are
accrued based on our best estimate of the wage and benefit costs
to be incurred. Costs related to the idling of employees that
are expected to be temporary are expensed as incurred. We review
the adequacy and continuing need for these liabilities on a
quarterly basis in conjunction with our quarterly production and
labor forecasts. In the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008 we recorded $516 million and
$1.8 billion, respectively, of additional postemployment
benefit costs in accordance with SFAS No. 112,
Employers Accounting for Postemployment
Benefits an amendment of FASB Statements No. 5
and 43 (SFAS No. 112). In the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2008, we recorded
$470 million and $1.4 billion, respectively, related
to previously announced capacity actions while the remaining
$46 million and $407 million, respectively, resulted
from the 2008 Special Attrition Programs. Refer to Note 10.
The following table summarizes activity for postemployment
benefit costs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
858
|
|
|
$
|
1,269
|
|
|
$
|
1,269
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
1,840
|
|
|
|
364
|
|
|
|
294
|
|
Interest accretion
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
(611
|
)
|
|
|
(792
|
)
|
|
|
(655
|
)
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
2,118
|
|
|
$
|
858
|
|
|
$
|
920
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the number of employees included
in the idled or to be idled facilities and subject to special
attrition programs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Employees at idled or to be idled facilities
|
|
|
15,700
|
|
|
|
8,900
|
|
|
|
8,200
|
|
Employees subject to various attrition programs
|
|
|
3,200
|
|
|
|
3,800
|
|
|
|
4,400
|
|
41
GENERAL
MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 15. Restructuring
and Other Initiatives
We have executed various restructuring and other initiatives and
may execute additional initiatives in the future to align
manufacturing capacity to prevailing global automotive
production and to improve the utilization of remaining
facilities. Such initiatives may include facility idlings,
consolidation of operations and functions, production
relocations or reductions and voluntary and involuntary employee
separation programs. Estimates of restructuring and other
initiative charges are based on information available at the
time such charges are recorded. Due to the inherent uncertainty
involved, actual amounts paid for such activities may differ
from amounts initially recorded. Accordingly, we may revise
previous estimates.
The following table summarizes our restructuring and other
initiative charges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Automotive Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMNA
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
GME
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
349
|
|
GMLAAM
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
GMAP
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Automotive Operations
|
|
$
|
62
|
|
|
$
|
265
|
|
|
$
|
333
|
|
|
$
|
416
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refer to Note 14 for further discussion of postemployment
benefits costs related to hourly employees of GMNA, and
Note 10 for pension and other postretirement benefit
charges related to our hourly employee separation initiatives.
The following table summarizes the components of our
restructuring charges by segment in the three months ended
September 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMNA
|
|
|
GME
|
|
|
GMLAAM
|
|
|
GMAP
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Separation costs
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
62
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total restructuring charges
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the components of our
restructuring charges by segment in the nine months ended
September 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMNA
|
|
|
GME
|
|
|
GMLAAM
|
|
|
GMAP
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Separation costs
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
252
|
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
$
|
70
|
|
|
$
|
354
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total restructuring charges
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
231
|
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
$
|
70
|
|
|
$
|
333
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMNA recorded restructuring charges of $1 million and
$3 million in the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008, respectively. These charges related to
a U.S. salaried severance program, which allows involuntarily
terminated employees to receive ongoing wages and benefits for
no longer than 12 months.
42
GENERAL
MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
GME recorded net restructuring charges of $29 million and
$231 million in the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008, respectively. These charges were
related to the following restructuring initiatives:
|
|
|
|
|
In the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, GME
recorded restructuring charges in Germany of $22 million
and $122 million, respectively, for retirement programs,
along with additional minor separations under other current
programs. Approximately 4,600 employees will leave under early
retirement programs in Germany through 2013. The total remaining
cost for the early retirements will be recognized over the
remaining required service period of the employees.
|
|
|
In the three months ended June 30, 2007, GME announced
additional separation programs affecting 1,900 employees at the
Antwerp, Belgium facility. GME recorded $2 million and
$82 million for these programs in the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2008, respectively, having previously
recorded $353 million in 2007.
|
|
|
In the nine months ended September 30, 2008, GME recorded
restructuring charges of $16 million related to separation
programs at the Strasbourg, France facility, which were
announced in the three months ended June 30, 2008.
|
|
|
The remaining $5 million and $32 million in separation
charges reported in the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008, respectively, relate to the cost of
initiatives previously announced. These include voluntary
separations in Sweden and the United Kingdom.
|
|
|
Additionally, GME reversed accruals of $21 million in the
nine months ended September 30, 2008 associated with the
favorable resolution of claims by the government of Portugal
filed in conjunction with the facility closure in Azambuja in
2006.
|
GMLAAM recorded restructuring charges of $23 million and
$29 million in the three months and nine months ended
September 30, 2008, respectively. These charges related to
separation programs in South Africa and Chile.
GMAP recorded net restructuring charges of $9 million and
$70 million in the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008, respectively. These charges were
related to the following restructuring initiatives:
|
|
|
|
|
In the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, GMAP
recorded restructuring charges in Australia of $2 million
and $63 million, respectively, related to a facility idling
at GM Holden, Ltd. (GM Holden), which manufactures FAM II 4
cylinder engines. The program will affect 650 employees, who
will leave through December 2009, and has total estimated costs
of $67 million. The remaining cost of this program will be
recognized over the remaining required service period of the
employees.
|
|
|
In the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, GMAP
recorded restructuring charges in Australia of $7 million,
which were related to GM Holden implementing an early separation
program offered to salaried employees. The program was announced
in September 2008, will continue through December 2008 and has a
total estimated cost of $10 million.
|
The following table summarizes the components of our
restructuring charges by segment in the three months ended
September 30, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMNA
|
|
|
GME
|
|
|
GMLAAM
|
|
|
GMAP
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Separation costs
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
262
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
265
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total restructuring charges
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
262
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
265
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43
GENERAL
MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
The following summarizes the components of our restructuring
charges by segment in the nine months ended September 30,
2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMNA
|
|
|
GME
|
|
|
GMLAAM
|
|
|
GMAP
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Separation costs
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
349
|
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
|
$
|
42
|
|
|
$
|
416
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total restructuring charges
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
349
|
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
|
$
|
42
|
|
|
$
|
416
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMNA recorded restructuring charges of $2 million and
$7 million in the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2007, respectively. The charges were related
to a U.S. salaried severance program as described in more detail
above.
GME recorded restructuring charges relating to separation
programs of $262 million and $349 million in the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2007, respectively.
These charges were related to the following restructuring
initiatives:
|
|
|
|
|
In the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, GME
recorded charges in Germany of $33 million and
$103 million, respectively. These charges primarily related
to early retirement programs, along with additional minor
separations under other programs in Germany as described in more
detail above.
|
|
|
In the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, GME
recorded charges of $226 million and $229 million,
respectively, related to initiatives in Belgium.
|
|
|
The remaining $3 million and $17 million in separation
charges reported in the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2007, respectively, relate to initiatives
announced in Sweden and the United Kingdom.
|
GMLAAM recorded restructuring charges of $18 million in the
nine months ended September 30, 2007 for employee
separations at General Motors do Brasil Ltd. (GM do Brasil).
These initiatives were announced and completed in the three
months ended June 30, 2007 and resulted in the separation
of 600 employees.
GMAP recorded restructuring charges of $1 million and
$42 million in the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2007, respectively. The charges were related
to a voluntary employee separation program at GM Holden, which
was announced in the three months ended March 31, 2007.
This initiative reduced the facilitys workforce by 650
employees as a result of increased plant operational efficiency.
Note 16. Impairments
We periodically review the carrying value of our long-lived
assets to be held and used when events and circumstances warrant
and in conjunction with the annual business planning cycle. If
the carrying value of a long-lived asset or asset group is
considered impaired, an impairment charge is recorded for the
amount by which the carrying amount exceeds fair value. Fair
value is determined primarily using the anticipated cash flows
discounted at a rate commensurate with the risk involved.
Product-specific assets may become impaired as a result of
declines in profitability due to changes in volume, pricing or
costs. Impairment charges related to automotive assets are
recorded in Automotive cost of sales. Refer to Note 15 for
additional detail on restructuring and other initiatives.
Due to the current unstable global economy and credit markets,
it is reasonably possible that these conditions could
deteriorate further and negatively affect our anticipated cash
flows to such an extent that we could be required to record
impairment charges against our long-lived assets.
We periodically review the carrying value of our portfolio of
equipment on operating leases for impairment when events and
circumstances warrant and in conjunction with our quarterly
review of residual values and associated depreciation rates. If
the carrying value is considered impaired, an impairment charge
is recorded for the amount by which the carrying value exceeds
the
44
GENERAL
MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
fair value. Fair value is determined primarily using the
anticipated cash flows discounted at a rate commensurate with
the risk involved.
Our Automotive segments portfolio of equipment on
operating leases is primarily comprised of vehicles leased to
rental car companies, with lease terms of 11 months or
less. Our FIO segments portfolio of equipment on operating
leases is primarily comprised of vehicle leases to retail
customers with lease terms of up to 48 months. Impairment
charges are recorded in Automotive cost of sales by our
Automotive segment and in Financial services and insurance
expense by our FIO segment.
In addition, we test our goodwill for impairment annually and
when an event occurs or circumstances change such that it is
reasonably possible that impairment may exist. The annual
impairment test requires the identification of our reporting
units and a comparison of the fair value of each of our
reporting units to the respective carrying value. The fair value
of our reporting units is determined based on valuation
techniques using the best information that is available,
primarily discounted cash flow projections. If the carrying
value of a reporting unit is greater than the fair value of the
reporting unit then impairment may exist.
The following table summarizes our impairment charges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Long-lived asset impairments related to restructuring initiatives
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Other long-lived asset impairments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
FIO Equipment on operating leases, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
134
|
|
|
$
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMLAAM recorded long-lived asset impairment charges of
$1 million in the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008 related to restructuring initiatives at
our Arica City facility in Chile.
GMAP recorded long-lived asset impairment charges of
$28 million related to restructuring initiatives at GM
Holden in the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
FIO recorded impairment charges of $105 million related to
our portfolio of equipment on operating leases in the nine
months ended September 30, 2008. The impairment charge was
the result of our regular review of residual values related to
these leased assets. In the three months ended June 30,
2008, residual values of sport utility vehicles and fullsize
pick-up
trucks experienced a sudden and significant decline as a result
of a shift in customer preference to passenger cars and
crossover vehicles and away from sport utility vehicles and
fullsize
pick-up
trucks. This decline in residual values was the primary reason
for the impairment charges.
GMNA recorded long-lived asset impairment charges of
$70 million in the nine months ended September 30,
2007, for product-specific tooling assets.
GMAP recorded long-lived asset impairment charges of
$14 million in the nine months ended September 30,
2007, related to the cessation of production of VZ Commodore
passenger car derivatives at GM Holden.
45
GENERAL
MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 17. Loss
Per Share
Basic and diluted loss per share have been computed by dividing
Loss from continuing operations by the weighted average number
of shares outstanding in the period.
The following table summarizes the amounts used in the basic and
diluted loss per share computations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(2,542
|
)
|
|
$
|
(42,512
|
)
|
|
$
|
(21,264
|
)
|
|
$
|
(41,770
|
)
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding
|
|
|
571
|
|
|
|
566
|
|
|
|
568
|
|
|
|
566
|
|
Basic and diluted loss per share from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(4.45
|
)
|
|
$
|
(75.12
|
)
|
|
$
|
(37.44
|
)
|
|
$
|
(73.82
|
)
|
Due to net losses from continuing operations for all periods
presented, the assumed exercise of stock options had an
antidilutive effect and therefore was excluded from the
computation of diluted loss per share. The number of such
options not included in the computation of diluted loss per
share was 101 million and 107 million at
September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
No shares potentially issuable to satisfy the
in-the-money
amount of our convertible debentures have been included in the
computation of diluted loss per share for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 as our various
series of convertible debentures were not
in-the-money.
Note 18. Transactions
with GMAC
We have entered into various operating and financing
arrangements with GMAC as more fully described in our 2007
10-K. The
following tables summarize the financial statement effects of
our transactions with GMAC:
|
|
|
U.S.
Marketing Incentives and Operating Lease Residuals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Residual Support Program:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities recorded
|
|
$
|
599
|
|
|
$
|
118
|
|
|
$
|
422
|
|
Maximum obligations
|
|
$
|
1,451
|
|
|
$
|
1,062
|
|
|
$
|
903
|
|
Risk Sharing:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities recorded
|
|
$
|
385
|
|
|
$
|
144
|
|
|
$
|
130
|
|
Maximum amount guaranteed
|
|
$
|
1,434
|
|
|
$
|
1,118
|
|
|
$
|
978
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Total U.S. payments to GMAC, primarily related to marketing
incentives and operating lease residual program
|
|
$
|
3,079
|
|
|
$
|
3,404
|
|
46
GENERAL
MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Equipment
on Operating Leases Transferred to Us by GMAC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Note payable balance, secured by the assets transferred
|
|
$
|
35
|
|
|
$
|
35
|
|
|
$
|
373
|
|
In the three months ended June 30, 2008, residual values of
sport utility vehicles and fullsize
pick-up
trucks experienced a sudden and significant decline as a result
of a shift in customer preference to passenger cars and
crossover vehicles and away from fullsize
pick-up
trucks and sport utility vehicles. In addition, in the three
months ended September 30, 2008 residual values of fullsize
pick-up
trucks in Canada continued to decline significantly. This
decline in residual values is the primary factor responsible for
the impairment charges of $808 million and
$105 million recorded by GMAC and our FIO segment,
respectively, in the nine months ended September 30, 2008
related to equipment on operating leases. The determination of
vehicle residual values is a significant assumption in these
impairment analyses and in the determination of amounts to
accrue under the residual support and risk sharing agreements
discussed above. It is reasonably possible that vehicle residual
values could decline in the future and that we or GMAC may be
required to record further impairment charges, which may be
material. In addition, it is reasonably possible that such
declines in residual values may result in increases in required
payments under the residual support and risk sharing agreements
discussed above.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
U.S. exclusivity fee revenue
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
|
$
|
79
|
|
|
$
|
79
|
|
U.S. royalty revenue
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
On June 4, 2008, we, along with Cerberus ResCap Financing
LLC (Cerberus Fund) entered into a Participation Agreement
(Participation Agreement) with GMAC. The Participation Agreement
provides that we will fund up to $368 million in loans made
by GMAC to ResCap through a $3.5 billion secured loan
facility GMAC has provided to ResCap (ResCap Facility), and that
the Cerberus Fund will fund up to $382 million. The ResCap
Facility expires on May 1, 2010, and all funding pursuant
to the Participation Agreement is to be done on a pro-rata basis
between us and the Cerberus Fund.
We and the Cerberus Fund are required to fund our respective
portions of the Participation Agreement when the amount
outstanding pursuant to the ResCap Facility exceeds
$2.75 billion, unless a default event has occurred, in
which case we and the Cerberus Fund are required to fund our
respective maximum obligations. Amounts funded by us and the
Cerberus Fund pursuant to the Participation Agreement are
subordinate to GMACs interest in the ResCap Facility, and
all principal payments remitted by ResCap under the ResCap
Facility are applied to GMACs outstanding balance, until
such balance is zero. Principal payments remitted by ResCap
while GMACs outstanding balance is zero are applied on a
pro-rata basis to us and the Cerberus Fund.
The ResCap Facility is secured by various assets held by ResCap
and its subsidiaries, and we are entitled to receive interest at
LIBOR plus 2.75% for the amount we have funded pursuant to the
Participation Agreement. In addition, we and the Cerberus Fund
are also entitled to receive our pro-rata share of the 1.75%
interest on GMACs share of the total outstanding balance.
At
47
GENERAL
MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
September 30, 2008, ResCap had fully drawn down the maximum
amount pursuant to the ResCap Facility, and we had funded our
maximum obligation of $368 million, which is recorded as
Equity in and advances to nonconsolidated affiliates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unsecured
Exposure Contractual Limit
|
Based on an agreement between GMAC and us, our unsecured
obligations to GMAC cannot exceed $1.5 billion. These
unsecured obligations arise from certain operating and financing
arrangements within the United States. As a result of the market
developments, which occurred during the three months ended
June 30, 2008, including a decline in residual values of
sport utility vehicles and fullsize
pick-up
trucks, our estimated obligations at June 30, 2008 exceeded
the $1.5 billion contractual limit. In response, on
August 6, 2008, we paid GMAC $646 million representing
prepayment of the obligations included in the estimate of total
liabilities subject to the contractual limit. At
September 30, 2008 we had a prepaid balance with GMAC of
$428 million, which represents the amount of our
obligations we have paid in advance in order to remain at or
below the $1.5 billion contractual limit.
As disclosed above, it is reasonably possible vehicle residual
values could decline further and that we may be required to
record increases in our liabilities related to the residual
support and risk sharing agreements and accordingly make further
payments to GMAC under this agreement.
Balance
Sheet
The following table summarizes the balance sheet effects of our
transactions with GMAC:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts and notes receivable (a)
|
|
$
|
1,840
|
|
|
$
|
1,285
|
|
|
$
|
1,758
|
|
Other current assets (b)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
30
|
|
|
$
|
39
|
|
Equity in and advances to nonconsolidated affiliates (c)
|
|
$
|
368
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable (d)
|
|
$
|
421
|
|
|
$
|
548
|
|
|
$
|
643
|
|
Short-term borrowings and current portion of long-term
debt (e)
|
|
$
|
2,580
|
|
|
$
|
2,802
|
|
|
$
|
2,935
|
|
Accrued expenses (f)
|
|
$
|
1,269
|
|
|
$
|
2,134
|
|
|
$
|
1,573
|
|
Long-term debt (g)
|
|
$
|
99
|
|
|
$
|
119
|
|
|
$
|
284
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Represents wholesale settlements due from GMAC, amounts owed by
GMAC with respect to the Equipment on operating leases, net
transferred to us and the exclusivity fee and royalty
arrangement. |
(b) |
|
Primarily represents distributions due from GMAC on our
Preferred Membership Interests. |
(c) |
|
Represents amounts funded pursuant to the Participation
Agreement. |
(d) |
|
Primarily represents amounts accrued for interest rate support,
capitalized cost reduction, residual support and lease
pull-ahead programs and the risk sharing arrangement. |
(e) |
|
Represents wholesale financing, sales of receivable transactions
and the short-term portion of term loans provided to certain
dealerships which we own or in which we have an equity interest.
In addition, it includes borrowing arrangements |
48
GENERAL
MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
with GME locations and arrangements related to GMACs
funding of our company-owned vehicles, rental car vehicles
awaiting sale at auction and funding of the sale of our vehicles
in which we retain title while the vehicles are consigned to
GMAC or dealers, primarily in the United Kingdom. Our financing
remains outstanding until the title is transferred to the
dealers. This amount also includes the short-term portion of a
note provided to our wholly-owned subsidiary holding debt
related to the Equipment on operating leases, net transferred to
us from GMAC. |
(f) |
|
Primarily represents accruals for marketing incentives on
vehicles which are sold, or anticipated to be sold, to customers
or dealers and financed by GMAC in the U.S. This includes the
estimated amount of residual support accrued under the residual
support and risk sharing programs, rate support under the
interest rate support programs, operating lease and finance
receivable capitalized cost reduction incentives paid to GMAC to
reduce the capitalized cost in automotive lease contracts and
retail automotive contracts, and cost under lease pull-ahead
programs. In addition it includes interest accrued on the
transactions in (e) above. |
(g) |
|
Primarily represents the long-term portion of term loans and a
note payable with respect to the Equipment on operating leases,
net transferred to us mentioned in (e) above. |
Statement
of Operations
The following table summarizes the income statement effects of
our transactions with GMAC:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales and revenue (reduction) (a)
|
|
$
|
1,057
|
|
|
$
|
(657
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,128
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,520
|
)
|
Cost of sales and other expenses (b)
|
|
$
|
180
|
|
|
$
|
140
|
|
|
$
|
570
|
|
|
$
|
384
|
|
Automotive interest income and other non-operating income,
net (c)
|
|
$
|
94
|
|
|
$
|
109
|
|
|
$
|
266
|
|
|
$
|
321
|
|
Interest expense (d)
|
|
$
|
61
|
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
|
$
|
176
|
|
|
$
|
171
|
|
Servicing expense (e)
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
39
|
|
|
$
|
66
|
|
|
$
|
134
|
|
Derivative gain (loss) (f)
|
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
(5
|
)
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Primarily represents the reduction in net sales and revenue for
marketing incentives on vehicles which are sold, or anticipated
to be sold, to customers or dealers and financed by GMAC in the
U.S. This includes the estimated amount of residual support
accrued under the residual support and risk sharing programs,
rate support under the interest rate support programs, operating
lease and finance receivable capitalized cost reduction
incentives paid to GMAC to reduce the capitalized cost in
automotive lease contracts and retail automotive contracts, and
costs under lease pull-ahead programs. This amount is offset by
net sales for vehicles sold to GMAC for employee and
governmental lease programs and third party resale purposes.
During the three months ended September 30, 2008, net sales
and revenue were favorably affected by a reduction of
$0.7 billion in the accruals for residual support programs
for leased vehicles due to recent experience related to
dealer/lessee lease buy-outs and improvement in residual values
of fullsize pick-ups and sport utility vehicles. |
(b) |
|
Primarily represents cost of sales on the sale of vehicles to
GMAC for employee and governmental lease programs and third
party resale purposes. Also includes miscellaneous expenses for
services performed for us by GMAC. |
(c) |
|
Represents income on our Preferred Membership Interests in GMAC,
interest earned on amounts outstanding under the Participation
Agreement, exclusivity and royalty fee income and reimbursements
by GMAC for certain services we provided. Included in this
amount is rental income related to GMACs primary executive
and administrative offices located in the Renaissance Center in
Detroit, Michigan. The lease agreement expires on
November 30, 2016. |
(d) |
|
Represents interest incurred on term loans, notes payable and
wholesale settlements. |
(e) |
|
Represents servicing fees paid to GMAC on the automotive leases
we retained. |
(f) |
|
Represents gains and losses recognized in connection with a
derivative transaction entered into with GMAC as the
counterparty. |
49
GENERAL
MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 19. Segment
Reporting
We operate in two businesses, consisting of GMA and FIO. Our
four automotive segments consist of GMNA, GME, GMLAAM and GMAP.
We manufacture our cars and trucks in 35 countries under the
following brands: Buick, Cadillac, Chevrolet, GMC, GM Daewoo,
Holden, HUMMER, Opel, Pontiac, Saab, Saturn, Vauxhall and
Wuling. Our FIO business consists of our 49% share of
GMACs operating results, which we account for under the
equity method, and Other Financing, which is comprised primarily
of two special purpose entities holding automotive leases
previously owned by GMAC and its affiliates that we retained,
and the elimination of inter-segment transactions between GM
Automotive and Corporate and Other.
Corporate and Other includes the elimination of inter-segment
transactions, certain non-segment specific revenue and expenses,
including costs related to postretirement benefits for Delphi
and other retirees and certain corporate activities. Amounts
presented in automotive sales, interest income and interest
expense in the tables that follow principally relate to the
inter-segment transactions eliminated at Corporate and Other.
All inter-segment balances and transactions have been eliminated
in consolidation.
In the three months ended December 31, 2007, we changed our
measure of segment profitability from Net income (loss) to
income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes,
equity income, net of tax and minority interest, net of tax.
Amounts for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2007 have been revised to present these periods on a comparable
basis for these changes. In the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008, we reclassified immaterial amounts
related to a vehicle assembly agreement from Automotive cost of
sales to Automotive sales to report the arrangement on a net
basis. In addition, 2007 amounts have been reclassified for the
retroactive effect of discontinued operations due to the August
2007 sale of Allison as discussed in Note 3. Historically,
Allison was included in GMNA. Certain reclassifications,
including inter-segment eliminations between Corporate and FIO,
have been made to the 2007 financial information to conform to
current period presentation.
In the three months ended June 30, 2008 we determined that
GM Daewoo Auto & Technology Company (GM Daewoo), our
50.9% owned and consolidated Korean subsidiary, included in our
GMAP segment, had been applying hedge accounting to certain
derivative contracts designated as cash flow hedges of
forecasted sales without fully considering whether these sales
were at all times probable of occurring. In accordance with
SFAS No. 133, gains and losses on derivatives used to
hedge a probable forecasted transaction are deferred as a
component of other comprehensive income and reclassified into
earnings in the period in which the forecasted transaction
occurs. Gains and losses on derivatives related to forecasted
transactions that are not probable of occurring are required to
be recorded in current period earnings. In the three months
ended June 30, 2008, we corrected our previous accounting
by recognizing in Automotive sales losses of $407 million
($262 million in income (loss) from continuing operations
before income taxes and $150 million after-tax and after
minority interests) on these derivatives which had been
inappropriately deferred in Accumulated other comprehensive
loss. Of this amount, $250 million ($163 million in
income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes and
$93 million after-tax and after minority interests) should
have been recognized in earnings in the three months ended
March 31, 2008, and the remainder should have been
recognized in prior periods, predominantly in 2007. We have not
restated our condensed consolidated financial statements or
prior annual financial statements because we have concluded that
the effect of correcting for this item and other minor
out-of-period
adjustments is not material to the three months ended
June 30, 2008 and to each of the earlier periods.
50
GENERAL
MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMA
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
Excluding
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMNA
|
|
|
GME
|
|
|
GMLAAM
|
|
|
GMAP
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
GMA
|
|
|
& Other(a)
|
|
|
FIO
|
|
|
GMAC(c)
|
|
|
Financing(b)
|
|
|
FIO
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
At and for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automotive sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
External customers
|
|
$
|
21,529
|
|
|
$
|
7,115
|
|
|
$
|
5,588
|
|
|
$
|
3,271
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
37,503
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
37,503
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
37,503
|
|
Inter-segment
|
|
|
1,015
|
|
|
|
367
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
1,495
|
|
|
|
(2,970
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total automotive sales
|
|
|
22,544
|
|
|
|
7,482
|
|
|
|
5,681
|
|
|
|
4,766
|
|
|
|
(2,970
|
)
|
|
|
37,503
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,503
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,503
|
|
Financial services and insurance revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
438
|
|
|
|
438
|
|
|
|
438
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales and revenue
|
|
$
|
22,544
|
|
|
$
|
7,482
|
|
|
$
|
5,681
|
|
|
$
|
4,766
|
|
|
$
|
(2,970
|
)
|
|
$
|
37,503
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
37,503
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
438
|
|
|
$
|
438
|
|
|
$
|
37,941
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, amortization and impairment
|
|
$
|
1,255
|
|
|
$
|
447
|
|
|
$
|
65
|
|
|
$
|
145
|
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
|
$
|
1,930
|
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
$
|
1,945
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
|
$
|
1,968
|
|
Equity in loss of GMAC LLC
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,235
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,235
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,235
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
229
|
|
|
$
|
153
|
|
|
$
|
75
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
482
|
|
|
$
|
(374
|
)
|
|
$
|
108
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
128
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
$
|
509
|
|
|
$
|
198
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
$
|
55
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
777
|
|
|
$
|
(235
|
)
|
|
$
|
542
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
|
$
|
570
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes,
equity income and minority interest
|
|
$
|
(384
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,019
|
)
|
|
$
|
517
|
|
|
$
|
(115
|
)
|
|
$
|
(57
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,058
|
)
|
|
$
|
(131
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,189
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,476
|
)
|
|
$
|
83
|
|
|
$
|
(1,393
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,582
|
)
|
Equity income (loss), net of tax
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
Minority interests, net of tax
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
$
|
(395
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,003
|
)
|
|
$
|
514
|
|
|
$
|
(6
|
)
|
|
$
|
(57
|
)
|
|
$
|
(947
|
)
|
|
$
|
(129
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,076
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,476
|
)
|
|
$
|
78
|
|
|
$
|
(1,398
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,474
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in nonconsolidated affiliates
|
|
$
|
539
|
|
|
$
|
354
|
|
|
$
|
60
|
|
|
$
|
1,360
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,313
|
|
|
$
|
38
|
|
|
$
|
2,351
|
|
|
$
|
1,949
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,949
|
|
|
$
|
4,300
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
79,162
|
|
|
$
|
25,289
|
|
|
$
|
9,014
|
|
|
$
|
13,720
|
|
|
$
|
(12,483
|
)
|
|
$
|
114,702
|
|
|
$
|
(11,601
|
)
|
|
$
|
103,101
|
|
|
$
|
6,418
|
|
|
$
|
906
|
|
|
$
|
7,324
|
|
|
$
|
110,425
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
$
|
161
|
|
|
$
|
515
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
676
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
676
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
676
|
|
51
GENERAL
MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMA
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
Excluding
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMNA
|
|
|
GME
|
|
|
GMLAAM
|
|
|
GMAP
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
GMA
|
|
|
& Other(a)
|
|
|
FIO
|
|
|
GMAC(c)
|
|
|
Financing(b)
|
|
|
FIO
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
At and for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automotive sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
External customers
|
|
$
|
26,022
|
|
|
$
|
8,385
|
|
|
$
|
4,829
|
|
|
$
|
3,766
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
43,002
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
43,002
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
43,002
|
|
Inter-segment
|
|
|
585
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
1,514
|
|
|
|
(2,614
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total automotive sales
|
|
|
26,607
|
|
|
|
8,785
|
|
|
|
4,944
|
|
|
|
5,280
|
|
|
|
(2,614
|
)
|
|
|
43,002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,002
|
|
Financial services and insurance revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
700
|
|
|
|
700
|
|
|
|
700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales and revenue
|
|
$
|
26,607
|
|
|
$
|
8,785
|
|
|
$
|
4,944
|
|
|
$
|
5,280
|
|
|
$
|
(2,614
|
)
|
|
$
|
43,002
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
43,002
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
700
|
|
|
$
|
700
|
|
|
$
|
43,702
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, amortization and impairment
|
|
$
|
1,341
|
|
|
$
|
407
|
|
|
$
|
76
|
|
|
$
|
150
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
1,983
|
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
1,997
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
297
|
|
|
$
|
297
|
|
|
$
|
2,294
|
|
Equity in loss of GMAC LLC
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(809
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(809
|
)
|
|
$
|
(809
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
365
|
|
|
$
|
178
|
|
|
$
|
41
|
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
629
|
|
|
$
|
(277
|
)
|
|
$
|
352
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
36
|
|
|
$
|
36
|
|
|
$
|
388
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
$
|
747
|
|
|
$
|
197
|
|
|
$
|
58
|
|
|
$
|
61
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
1,064
|
|
|
$
|
(225
|
)
|
|
$
|
839
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
106
|
|
|
$
|
106
|
|
|
$
|
945
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes,
equity income and minority interests
|
|
$
|
(1,760
|
)
|
|
$
|
(406
|
)
|
|
$
|
375
|
|
|
$
|
168
|
|
|
$
|
(27
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,650
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,033
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,683
|
)
|
|
$
|
(773
|
)
|
|
$
|
118
|
|
|
$
|
(655
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,338
|
)
|
Equity income (loss), net of tax
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
Minority interests, net of tax
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(68
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(102
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
$
|
(1,766
|
)
|
|
$
|
(398
|
)
|
|
$
|
374
|
|
|
$
|
186
|
|
|
$
|
(28
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,632
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,031
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,663
|
)
|
|
$
|
(773
|
)
|
|
$
|
110
|
|
|
$
|
(663
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,326
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
$
|
45
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
45
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
45
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
45
|
|
Gain on sale of discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
$
|
3,504
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,504
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,504
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,504
|
|
Investments in nonconsolidated affiliates
|
|
$
|
327
|
|
|
$
|
437
|
|
|
$
|
64
|
|
|
$
|
1,167
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,995
|
|
|
$
|
36
|
|
|
$
|
2,031
|
|
|
$
|
6,852
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,852
|
|
|
$
|
8,883
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
92,377
|
|
|
$
|
27,655
|
|
|
$
|
6,611
|
|
|
$
|
14,860
|
|
|
$
|
(10,945
|
)
|
|
$
|
130,558
|
|
|
$
|
(213
|
)
|
|
$
|
130,345
|
|
|
$
|
12,413
|
|
|
$
|
6,742
|
|
|
$
|
19,155
|
|
|
$
|
149,500
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
$
|
188
|
|
|
$
|
575
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
763
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
763
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
763
|
|
52
GENERAL
MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMA
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
Excluding
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMNA
|
|
|
GME
|
|
|
GMLAAM
|
|
|
GMAP
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
GMA
|
|
|
& Other(a)
|
|
|
FIO
|
|
|
GMAC(c)
|
|
|
Financing(b)
|
|
|
FIO
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automotive sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
External customers
|
|
$
|
64,579
|
|
|
$
|
26,269
|
|
|
$
|
15,273
|
|
|
$
|
10,999
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
117,120
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
117,120
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
117,120
|
|
Inter-segment
|
|
|
2,328
|
|
|
|
1,701
|
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
|
4,221
|
|
|
|
(8,530
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total automotive sales
|
|
|
66,907
|
|
|
|
27,970
|
|
|
|
15,553
|
|
|
|
15,220
|
|
|
|
(8,530
|
)
|
|
|
117,120
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117,120
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117,120
|
|
Financial services and insurance revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,466
|
|
|
|
1,466
|
|
|
|
1,466
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales and revenue
|
|
$
|
66,907
|
|
|
$
|
27,970
|
|
|
$
|
15,553
|
|
|
$
|
15,220
|
|
|
$
|
(8,530
|
)
|
|
$
|
117,120
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
117,120
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,466
|
|
|
$
|
1,466
|
|
|
$
|
118,586
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, amortization and impairment
|
|
$
|
3,761
|
|
|
$
|
1,434
|
|
|
$
|
220
|
|
|
$
|
492
|
|
|
$
|
42
|
|
|
$
|
5,949
|
|
|
$
|
40
|
|
|
$
|
5,989
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
519
|
|
|
$
|
519
|
|
|
$
|
6,508
|
|
Equity in loss of GMAC LLC
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(4,777
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(4,777
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,777
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
721
|
|
|
$
|
492
|
|
|
$
|
235
|
|
|
$
|
80
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
1,529
|
|
|
$
|
(976
|
)
|
|
$
|
553
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
59
|
|
|
$
|
59
|
|
|
$
|
612
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
$
|
1,781
|
|
|
$
|
618
|
|
|
$
|
56
|
|
|
$
|
160
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
2,624
|
|
|
$
|
(587
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,037
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
111
|
|
|
$
|
111
|
|
|
$
|
2,148
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes,
equity income and minority interest
|
|
$
|
(10,513
|
)
|
|
$
|
(938
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,477
|
|
|
$
|
(272
|
)
|
|
$
|
(69
|
)
|
|
$
|
(10,315
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,659
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14,974
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,755
|
)
|
|
$
|
132
|
|
|
$
|
(5,623
|
)
|
|
$
|
(20,597
|
)
|
Equity income (loss), net of tax
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
309
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
310
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
310
|
|
Minority interests, net of tax
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
$
|
(10,553
|
)
|
|
$
|
(908
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,476
|
|
|
$
|
117
|
|
|
$
|
(69
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9,937
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,658
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14,595
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,755
|
)
|
|
$
|
115
|
|
|
$
|
(5,640
|
)
|
|
$
|
(20,235
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenditures for property
|
|
$
|
2,957
|
|
|
$
|
1,056
|
|
|
$
|
237
|
|
|
$
|
606
|
|
|
$
|
152
|
|
|
$
|
5,008
|
|
|
$
|
519
|
|
|
$
|
5,527
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,527
|
|
53
GENERAL
MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMA
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
Excluding
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMNA
|
|
|
GME
|
|
|
GMLAAM
|
|
|
GMAP
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
GMA
|
|
|
& Other(a)
|
|
|
FIO
|
|
|
GMAC(c)
|
|
|
Financing(b)
|
|
|
FIO
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automotive sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
External customers
|
|
$
|
82,311
|
|
|
$
|
25,511
|
|
|
$
|
12,555
|
|
|
$
|
10,699
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
131,076
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
131,076
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
131,076
|
|
Inter-segment
|
|
|
2,016
|
|
|
|
1,257
|
|
|
|
299
|
|
|
|
4,276
|
|
|
|
(7,848
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total automotive sales
|
|
|
84,327
|
|
|
|
26,768
|
|
|
|
12,854
|
|
|
|
14,975
|
|
|
|
(7,848
|
)
|
|
|
131,076
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131,076
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131,076
|
|
Financial services and insurance revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,530
|
|
|
|
2,530
|
|
|
|
2,530
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales and revenue
|
|
$
|
84,327
|
|
|
$
|
26,768
|
|
|
$
|
12,854
|
|
|
$
|
14,975
|
|
|
$
|
(7,848
|
)
|
|
$
|
131,076
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
131,076
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,530
|
|
|
$
|
2,530
|
|
|
$
|
133,606
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, amortization and impairment
|
|
$
|
4,170
|
|
|
$
|
1,219
|
|
|
$
|
227
|
|
|
$
|
428
|
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
|
$
|
6,076
|
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
$
|
6,103
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,010
|
|
|
$
|
1,010
|
|
|
$
|
7,113
|
|
Equity in loss of GMAC LLC
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(874
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(874
|
)
|
|
$
|
(874
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
916
|
|
|
$
|
499
|
|
|
$
|
107
|
|
|
$
|
119
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
1,642
|
|
|
$
|
(648
|
)
|
|
$
|
994
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
302
|
|
|
$
|
302
|
|
|
$
|
1,296
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
$
|
2,269
|
|
|
$
|
586
|
|
|
$
|
35
|
|
|
$
|
177
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
3,074
|
|
|
$
|
(755
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,319
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
561
|
|
|
$
|
561
|
|
|
$
|
2,880
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes,
equity income and minority interest
|
|
$
|
(2,069
|
)
|
|
$
|
(92
|
)
|
|
$
|
925
|
|
|
$
|
544
|
|
|
$
|
(35
|
)
|
|
$
|
(727
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,967
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,694
|
)
|
|
$
|
(753
|
)
|
|
$
|
403
|
|
|
$
|
(350
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,044
|
)
|
Equity income (loss), net of tax
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
335
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
438
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
440
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
440
|
|
Minority interests, net of tax
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
(270
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(354
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(353
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(361
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
$
|
(2,062
|
)
|
|
$
|
(79
|
)
|
|
$
|
924
|
|
|
$
|
609
|
|
|
$
|
(35
|
)
|
|
$
|
(643
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,964
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,607
|
)
|
|
$
|
(753
|
)
|
|
$
|
395
|
|
|
$
|
(358
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,965
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinuing operations, net of tax
|
|
$
|
256
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
256
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
256
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
256
|
|
Gain on sale of discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
$
|
3,504
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,504
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,504
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,504
|
|
Expenditures for property
|
|
$
|
3,480
|
|
|
$
|
620
|
|
|
$
|
138
|
|
|
$
|
630
|
|
|
$
|
30
|
|
|
$
|
4,898
|
|
|
$
|
39
|
|
|
$
|
4,937
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
4,939
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Corporate and Other recorded charges of $652 million and
$4.1 billion in the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008, respectively, to reflect our estimated
obligations under the Amended Delphi-GM Settlement Agreements,
net of any estimated recoveries, updated to reflect current
uncertainties related to the credit markets and challenges in
the automotive industry. These charges reflect a
$622 million benefit associated with the New VEBA, as
discussed in Note 10, that serves to reduce our estimated
liability associated with Delphi OPEB related costs for Delphi
active employees and retirees. Corporate and Other recorded
charges of $350 and $925 million in the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2007, respectively for our
estimated liabilities under the Benefit Guarantee Agreements and
Delphi-GM Settlement Agreements. |
(b) |
|
Other Financing also includes the elimination of intercompany
receivables from total assets. Receivables eliminated at
September 30, 2008 and 2007 were $4.5 billion and
$4.0 billion, respectively. |
(c) |
|
We sold a 51% equity interest in GMAC in November 2006. The
remaining 49% equity interest is accounted for under the equity
method and is included in the GMAC segments assets. Refer
to Notes 6 and 18 for summarized financial information of
GMAC at and for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008 and 2007. |
Note 20. Subsequent
Events
On October 22, 2008, members of the IUE-CWA ratified the
closure agreement for our Moraine, Ohio plant, which is our only
IUE-CWA represented plant. The agreement is contingent upon the
establishment of a new healthcare plan for GM IUE-CWA retirees
funded entirely by an independent VEBA (IUE-CWA VEBA) that would
assume responsibility for providing
54
GENERAL
MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
retiree medical benefits to GM IUE-CWA retirees. In this regard,
on October 8, 2008, we and the IUE-CWA agreed in principle
to a framework for establishing such a VEBA.
This Framework includes the following commitments:
|
|
|
|
|
We will pay retiree medical benefits through December 31,
2011 for eligible IUE-CWA retirees. The present value of this
commitment is approximately $850 million; effective
January 1, 2012 a new plan funded by the IUE-CWA VEBA will
become solely responsible for paying the cost of these retiree
medical benefits.
|
|
|
We will pay to the IUE-CWA VEBA four equal installments with a
combined present value of $700 million on January 2,
2012, 2013, 2014 and 2015. Each installment payment will be
$280 million.
|
|
|
On July 1, 2012, we will pay to the IUE-CWA VEBA the first
of two equal installments with a combined present value of
$664 million; we will pay to the IUE-CWA VEBA the second of
the two equal installments on July 1, 2013. Each
installment payment will be $510 million.
|
|
|
We will amend the pension plan for IUE-CWA current and future
retirees and surviving spouses effective January 1, 2010 to
provide a flat monthly special lifetime benefit of $133.40. This
special lifetime benefit is intended to serve as a cost
pass-through of an equivalent after-tax increase in the monthly
contribution regarding retiree medical benefits. At
January 1, 2010, each recipient of this pension increase
will be assessed an additional non-escalating monthly
contribution of $103.34 per month as a condition to their
receipt of retiree medical benefits. The present value of such
after-tax contributions is $236 million.
|
The agreement will permanently shift any obligation to provide
postretirement medical benefits from us to the IUE-CWA VEBA that
will be funded by these fixed and capped payments from us and
managed by an independent committee.
The agreement is conditional, among other factors, upon
obtaining a settlement with a class of GM IUE-CWA retirees,
class certification, court approval and our determination that
we believe the accounting treatment to be reasonably
satisfactory.
Under the terms of the agreement our obligation to provide
retiree healthcare coverage for IUE-CWA retirees and
beneficiaries will terminate on January 1, 2012. The
obligation for retiree medical claims incurred thereafter will
be the responsibility of the IUE-CWA VEBA. Funding for the
IUE-CWA VEBA will begin after the IUE-CWA final effective date.
We are in the process of evaluating the accounting treatment for
such an agreement.
|
|
|
Salaried
Benefit Program Modifications
|
On October 22, 2008, we announced the suspension of certain
U.S. and Canadian salaried employee benefit programs including,
most significantly, the suspension of the company matching for
stock savings contributions to our 401(k) plan in the U.S.
effective November 1, 2008 and other reimbursements such as
contributions for tuition assistance and other reimbursement
programs effective January 1, 2009. We estimate these
actions will reduce annual cash spending and expense by
approximately $131 million per year.
|
|
|
Salaried
Workforce Reductions
|
On October 22, 2008, we announced that we will initiate
involuntary separations in some areas of the business in the
three months ending December 31, 2008 and early 2009 for
our salaried workforce. We are currently assessing the size and
effect of these reductions. Additionally, on October 29,
2008, we announced the extension of the acceptance period for
the Salaried Window Program from October 24, 2008 to
November 7, 2008 for eligible employees that previously
declined the offer. The majority of the employees accepting the
extended Salaried Window Program will retire on December 1,
2008. Refer to Note 10 for additional information on the
Salaried Window Program.
55
GENERAL
MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Hourly
Retiree Benefit Changes
|
On November 3, 2008 we notified nine unions, other than the
UAW and IUE-CWE, that effective January 1, 2009, 5,000
retirees will be subject to revised healthcare benefits
requiring monthly healthcare contributions as well as
co-payments and deductibles. The changes are expected to
generate savings of $5 million to $10 million in 2009
and reduce the APBO of this plan by $100 million to
$150 million.
|
|
|
Future
North America Capacity Actions
|
On November 7, 2008, as a result of the declining demand in
the automotive industry, we announced additional actions to
scale back production at a number of our North American
facilities in the three months ending March 31, 2009. We
will reduce production at a number of our assembly operations,
as well as supporting headcount at stamping and powertrain
facilities. We expect this reduction will result in the idling
of 5,500 hourly employees. As a result of these capacity
actions, we anticipate recording a charge of at least
$300 million in Automotive costs of sales in the three
months ending December 31, 2008. We are in the process of
assessing the effect that these actions will have on our benefit
plan accounting.
56
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
Item 2.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
This Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A) should be read
in conjunction with the accompanying condensed consolidated
financial statements and in conjunction with our Annual Report
on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2007 (2007
10-K).
We operate in two businesses, consisting of Automotive (GM
Automotive or GMA) and Financing and Insurance Operations (FIO).
We are engaged primarily in the worldwide development,
production and marketing of automobiles. We develop, manufacture
and market vehicles worldwide through four automotive segments:
GM North America (GMNA), GM Europe (GME), GM Latin
America/Africa/Mid-East (GMLAAM) and GM Asia Pacific (GMAP).
Also, our FIO operations are primarily conducted through GMAC
LLC (GMAC). We own a 49% equity interest in GMAC that is
accounted for under the equity method of accounting. GMAC
provides a broad range of financial services, including consumer
vehicle financing, automotive dealership and other commercial
financing, residential mortgage services, automobile service
contracts, personal automobile insurance coverage and selected
commercial insurance coverage. FIO also includes Other
Financing, which includes two special purpose entities holding
automotive leases having a current net book value of
$2.0 billion, as well as the elimination of intercompany
transactions with GMA and Corporate and Other.
In the three months ended December 31, 2007, we changed our
measure of segment profitability from Net income (loss) to Loss
from continuing operations before income taxes, equity income
and minority interest. Amounts for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2007 have been revised to reflect these
periods on a comparable basis for the changes discussed above.
In the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, we
reclassified amounts related to a vehicle assembly agreement
from Automotive cost of sales to Automotive sales to more
appropriately report the arrangement on a net basis for all
periods presented. In addition, 2007 amounts have been
reclassified for the retroactive effect of discontinued
operations due to the August 2007 sale of Allison Transmission
(Allison) as discussed in Note 3 to the condensed
consolidated financial statements. Historically, Allison was
included in GMNA. Certain reclassifications, including
inter-segment eliminations between Corporate and FIO, have been
made to the 2007 financial information to conform to the current
period presentation.
Consistent with industry practice, our market share information
includes estimates of industry vehicle sales in certain
countries where public reporting is not legally required or
otherwise available on a consistent basis.
The following provides a summary of significant results and
events in the three and nine months ended September 30,
2008, as well as an update from our 2007
10-K of the
global automotive industry, including current market challenges,
2008 priorities, key factors affecting future and current
results and our North American Turnaround Plan.
|
|
|
Global
Automotive Industry
|
The global automotive industry has been severely affected by the
deepening global credit crisis, volatile oil prices and the
general economic slow down in North America and Western Europe.
The industry continued to show growth in Eastern Europe, the
Latin America/Africa/Mid-East region and in Asia Pacific,
although the growth in these areas moderated from previous
levels and is beginning to show the effects of the credit market
crisis which began in the United States and has since spread to
Western Europe and the rest of the world. Global industry
vehicle sales to retail and fleet customers were
16.2 million vehicles in the three months ended
September 30, 2008, representing a 6.7% decrease compared
to the corresponding period in 2007. In the nine months ended
September 30, 2008, global industry vehicles sales were
52.9 million vehicles representing a 0.4% decrease compared
to the corresponding period in 2007. We expect global industry
vehicle sales to be approximately 68.5 million vehicles in
2008 compared to 70.7 million vehicles in 2007.
Our global vehicle sales in the three months ended
September 30, 2008 were 2.1 million vehicles, down
from 2.4 million vehicles (or 11.4%) in the corresponding
period in 2007. Vehicle sales decreased in the three months
ended September 30, 2008 for GMNA by 228,000 vehicles (or
18.9%) and for GME by 64,000 vehicles (or 12.3%). These
decreases were offset by vehicle sales increases of 11,000
vehicles (or 3.4%) at GMLAAM and 8,000 vehicles (or 2.6%) at
GMAP.
57
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
In the nine months ended September 30, 2008, our global
vehicle sales were 6.7 million vehicles down from
7.1 million vehicles (or 5.8%) in the corresponding period
in 2007. Vehicle sales decreased in the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 for GMNA by 573,000 vehicles (or 16.5%)
and for GME by 33,000 vehicles (or 2.0%). These decreases were
offset by vehicle sales increases of 117,000 vehicles (or 13.1%)
at GMLAAM and 80,000 vehicles (or 7.6%) at GMAP.
The following table summarizes our global market share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
GMNA
|
|
|
23.4%
|
|
|
|
24.4%
|
|
|
|
21.7%
|
|
|
|
23.2%
|
|
GME
|
|
|
8.9%
|
|
|
|
9.5%
|
|
|
|
9.3%
|
|
|
|
9.5%
|
|
GMAP
|
|
|
6.9%
|
|
|
|
6.5%
|
|
|
|
6.9%
|
|
|
|
6.8%
|
|
GMLAAM
|
|
|
17.0%
|
|
|
|
17.4%
|
|
|
|
17.3%
|
|
|
|
16.9%
|
|
|
|
|
Near-Term
Market Challenges
|
The challenging market conditions that began to develop in 2007
in North America and Western Europe have continued to adversely
affect our financial results in the three months ended
September 30, 2008. In addition, we have begun to see a
slow down of growth in our GMLAAM and GMAP segments as the
effects of the turmoil in the global credit markets and the
continued slow down of economies in the United States and
Western Europe have begun to affect the global economy.
The turmoil in the mortgage and credit markets, which began in
2007, along with continued reductions in housing values,
volatile fuel prices and recessionary trends have continued to
negatively affect consumers willingness to purchase our
products. These factors have contributed to significantly lower
vehicle sales in North America and, combined with rapid shifts
in consumer preferences toward cars and away from fullsize
pick-up
trucks and sport utility vehicles, have negatively affected our
results as such larger vehicles are among our more profitable
products. At our Annual Stockholders Meeting in June 2008,
we announced several actions in response to changing industry
conditions:
|
|
|
|
|
Elimination of production shifts at certain North American
fullsize
pick-up
truck and sport utility vehicle facilities;
|
|
|
Increased production of small and midsize cars;
|
|
|
Cessation of production at four truck facilities, in Oshawa,
Canada, Moraine, Ohio, Janesville, Wisconsin and Toluca, Mexico;
and
|
|
|
Strategic review of the HUMMER brand.
|
Since the Annual Stockholders Meeting, U.S. market and
economic conditions have deteriorated dramatically and we do not
expect these difficult conditions to improve in the near future.
Of greatest concern is declining consumer confidence as a result
of the general slowdown in the economy, the lack of liquidity in
the credit markets and the price of oil, which, as stated above,
has led to rapid changes in the U.S. industry sales mix, and
which has required us to take further actions to position our
company for sustainable profitability and growth. In addition,
GMAC has announced that it is tightening its underwriting
standards, which will further limit the availability of credit
to certain of our customers. These changes, particularly
declining consumer demand for fullsize
pick-up
trucks and sport utility vehicles, have led us to accelerate the
cessation of production at our Janesville, Wisconsin and
Moraine, Ohio facilities originally anticipated at the end of
the 2010 model year to December 2008. In addition, we announced
the cessation of production in the fourth quarter of 2009 at our
Grand Rapids, Michigan stamping facility.
In July 2008 we announced a number of initiatives aimed at
conserving or generating approximately $15.0 billion of
cash through the end of 2009. These actions, discussed in detail
in Liquidity below, include:
|
|
|
|
|
Several structural cost actions in North America, including
further reductions in truck capacity and related component,
stamping, and powertrain capacity;
|
58
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
|
|
Reductions in U.S. and Canada salaried employment and retiree
expenses;
|
|
|
Limiting our capital expenditures;
|
|
|
Improving working capital in North America and Europe;
|
|
|
Deferring certain payments related to the Settlement Agreement;
and
|
|
|
Suspending future dividend payments.
|
We expect these actions to generate approximately
$10.0 billion of cumulative cash improvements by the end of
2009.
However, based on the further deterioration of the global
economy in the three months ended September 30, 2008, we
announced additional initiatives designed to generate additional
liquidity of approximately $5.0 billion. These actions are
discussed in detail in Liquidity and Capital
Resources.
We will continue to identify and develop additional sources of
liquidity, including a broad global assessment of our assets for
potential sale or monetization. We believe that we can raise
significant liquidity from asset sales without negatively
affecting our strategic direction. In addition to asset sales,
we will also continue to access global capital markets on an
opportunistic basis when the global capital markets are
available to access on terms which are acceptable.
On July 28, 2008 we took further actions to align our
production with the shift in consumer demand and overall softer
market demand based on the weak economy in North America. We
announced the elimination of shifts at our Moraine, Ohio and
Shreveport, Louisiana facilities and adjusting of production run
rates at certain of our facilities in North America. We estimate
that this will reduce our capacity by approximately 117,000
vehicles.
In the three months ended June 30, 2008, the residual
values of sport utility vehicles and fullsize
pick-up
trucks being returned from lease declined substantially. This
decline is primarily due to the shift in consumer preferences
away from these vehicles in favor of passenger cars and
crossover vehicles. As discussed more fully in this MD&A,
this decline was the primary factor contributing to a
$1.6 billion increase in our lease related reserves and a
$105 million impairment loss on our FIO segments
portfolio of equipment on operating leases. In the three months
ended September 30, 2008, the residual values of sport
utility vehicles and fullsize
pick-up
trucks have increased somewhat since June 30, 2008,
however, the residual values remain significantly below our
historical experience.
In addition, in the United States, our results for the nine
months ended September 30, 2008 were negatively affected by
a work stoppage at one of our suppliers, American
Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. (American Axle).
As a result of the work stoppage, approximately 30 of our
facilities in North America were idled. This work stoppage did
not negatively affect our ability to meet customer demand due to
the high levels of inventory at our dealers. However,
GMNAs results were negatively affected by
$0.8 billion as a result of the loss of approximately
100,000 production units in the first three months of 2008. In
the three months ended June 30, 2008, the American Axle
work stoppage resulted in the loss of an additional 230,000
production units and had an earnings before tax effect of
approximately $1.8 billion. The UAW ratified a new labor
agreement with American Axle on May 22, 2008. We anticipate
that lost production will not be fully recovered, due to the
current economic environment in the United States and to the
market shift away from the types of vehicles that have been most
strongly affected. As consideration for resolving the work
stoppage, we agreed with American Axle to provide them with
upfront financial support capped at $215 million, of which
$197 million has been accrued, to help fund employee
buyouts, early retirements and buydowns.
Several other GM facilities were also idled by other work
stoppages associated with finalizing local UAW agreements. These
work stoppages resulted in the loss of approximately 33,000
production units in the three months ended June 30, 2008,
and had an earnings before tax effect of approximately
$0.2 billion. Members of the local union at the Lansing
Delta Township facility in Lansing, Michigan ratified a new
local labor agreement and production resumed on May 19,
2008. Members of the local union at the Fairfax facility in
Kansas City, Kansas also ratified a new local labor agreement
and production resumed on May 22, 2008.
59
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
The European market was relatively flat in the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 compared to the corresponding period in
2007. This was driven by the continued growth in the emerging
markets of Eastern Europe including Russia. The Western European
markets in the aggregate declined, with particularly significant
reductions in Spain and Italy. While the German market grew from
lower levels in the corresponding period in 2007, pricing
conditions remain difficult due to intense competitive activity.
In general, we expect the Western European markets to face a
challenging environment in the near-term, due to challenging
credit and volatile foreign exchange markets and lower consumer
confidence. In addition, we expect recent emission legislation
in Western Europe to unfavorably affect our potential costs in
these markets.
|
|
|
Customer
and Dealer Financing
|
In October 2008, in response to continued deterioration in the
credit markets, GMAC announced it will tighten its lending
standards in the United States, limiting purchases of retail
contracts to customers with a credit score of 700 or above. In
addition, GMAC will restrict contracts with higher advance rates
and longer terms. GMAC provided retail financing for 34% and 30%
of our new vehicle sales in North America in the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2008.
We believe GMACs stricter underwriting standards will
reduce the availability of credit to a significant number of our
customers. We have increased our promotions to highlight to
potential customers that dealers have access to multiple
financial institutions to finance customers with different
needs. However, as this change to GMACs lending standards
was recently announced it is not possible to reasonably predict
the effect on our vehicle sales if our customers are unable to
obtain substitute financing from other lenders. While we believe
that this will adversely affect our vehicle sales and our market
share in the United States, it is not possible to estimate the
magnitude of the effect.
In addition, GMAC also announced it will cease retail
originations to customers in Czech Republic, Finland, Greece,
Norway, Portugal, Slovak Republic and Spain, effective
November 1, 2008, and Australia and New Zealand by
December 31, 2008.
The following table summarizes GMACs approximate share of
retail financing of our vehicle sales in these markets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2008
|
|
|
Australia
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
Czech Republic
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
Finland
|
|
|
28
|
%
|
Greece
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
New Zealand
|
|
|
36
|
%
|
Norway
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
Portugal
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
Slovak Republic
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
Spain
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
GMAC also will cease wholesale originations to dealers in
Australia and New Zealand by December 31, 2008 and
transition out of the business. GMAC provided approximately 29%
and 55% of new vehicle wholesale financing to GM Holden, Ltd.
(GM Holden) dealers in Australia and New Zealand, respectively,
in the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
We believe smaller dealers, dealers in rural locations and
customers and dealers in credit markets that are smaller and
more concentrated will face the most difficulty finding
alternative retail and wholesale financing. If our customers and
dealers are unable to obtain substitute financing, we believe
our vehicle sales in these markets will be adversely affected.
Retail leasing has recently declined as a component of the
overall percentage of vehicle purchases financed in the United
States and Canada across most vehicle manufacturers. We are
currently taking steps to reduce the percentage of our retail
60
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
business that is financed with lease financing, including
incentive programs to encourage consumers to purchase rather
than lease vehicles. We plan to continue to offer leasing
options, although they will more likely be targeted to certain
products and segments. GMAC, our largest provider of lease
financing, is implementing other initiatives to reduce the risk
in its lease portfolio, such as exiting incentive based lease
financing in Canada and reducing its lease volume in the United
States. Lease financing was used for 15.8% of our retail sales
in the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to
18.7% in the corresponding period in 2007. As this change is
currently developing, it is not possible to reasonably predict
what each vehicle manufacturer will do with its retail leasing
incentives. Accordingly, while we believe this will adversely
affect our revenue, it is not possible to estimate the magnitude
of these changes on our results of operations. GMACs more
restrictive lending policy has also affected sales.
As disclosed in our 2007
10-K, our
growth and profitability priorities are straightforward:
|
|
|
|
|
Continue to execute great products;
|
|
|
Build strong brands and distribution channels;
|
|
|
Execute additional cost reduction initiatives;
|
|
|
Grow aggressively in emerging markets;
|
|
|
Continue development and implementation of our advanced
propulsion strategy; and
|
|
|
Drive the benefits of managing the business globally.
|
The following summarizes the progress on these priorities in the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, as well as
changes in any key factors affecting our current and future
results and our North American Turnaround Plan.
|
|
|
Continue
to Execute Great Products.
|
In June 2008 we announced that we were implementing certain
strategic initiatives over the next few years to respond to
growing demand for more fuel efficient vehicles and to address
the economic and market challenges in North America. The
initiatives include a new global compact car program for our
Chevrolet brand, a next generation for the Chevrolet Aveo and a
high efficiency engine module for the U.S. market. In addition,
the Board of Directors authorized funds for production of the
Chevrolet Volt extended range electric vehicle. Further, in the
three months ended September 30, 2008, we announced the
replacement for the Chevrolet Cobalt, the Chevrolet Cruze, which
is based on a global architecture and will be introduced in
Europe in March 2009, followed by other global regions.
Recognizing the changes in consumer preferences, 18 of our next
19 new products are expected to be cars and crossover vehicles.
|
|
|
Build
Strong Brands and Distribution Channels.
|
As discussed above under Near-Term Market
Challenges, we are undertaking a strategic review of the
HUMMER brand to determine its fit within our portfolio. We are
considering all options, including a complete revamp of the
product lineup to a partial or complete sale of the brand.
|
|
|
Execute
Additional Cost Reduction Initiatives.
|
As discussed above under Near-Term Market Challenges
and below under Liquidity, we have initiated
significant actions to be implemented over the next two years to
address our cost structure in response to current economic
conditions. The expected cash expenditures for the 2008 Special
Attrition Programs are $0.4 billion, of which
$0.3 billion was incurred in the nine months ended
September 30, 2008. We expect total cash expenditures
related to the 2008 U.S. and Canada announced capacity actions
to be $1.4 billion, of which we plan to spend
$0.1 billion in 2008, $0.6 billion in 2009, and
$0.7 billion beyond 2009.
61
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
Grow
Aggressively in Emerging Markets.
|
Vehicle sales and revenue continue to grow globally, with the
strongest growth in emerging markets such as Russia, Brazil,
ASEAN region, India, the Mid-East and China. Although the
current global credit crisis has affected sales in these regions
we believe that growth in these emerging markets will continue
to help mitigate challenging near-term market conditions in
North America and Western Europe. As a result, even though we
are reducing costs in many portions of our business, we expect
to continue to expend previously planned levels of capital in
these emerging markets, particularly China.
|
|
|
Continue
to Develop and Implement our Advanced Propulsion
Strategy.
|
We continue to develop and advance our alternative propulsion
strategy, focused on fuel and other technologies, making energy
diversity and environmental leadership a critical element of our
ongoing strategy. In addition to continuing to improve the
efficiency of our internal combustion engines, we are focused on
the introduction of propulsion technologies which utilize
alternative fuels and have intensified our efforts to displace
traditional petroleum-based fuels. For example, we have entered
into arrangements with battery and biofuel companies to support
development of commercially viable applications of these
technologies. We anticipate that this strategy will require a
major commitment of technical and financial resources. Like
others in the automotive industry, we recognize that the key
challenge to our advanced propulsion strategy will be our
ability to price our products to cover cost increases driven by
new technology. Since the beginning of 2008, emissions
legislation was passed or enacted in a number of Western
European countries which we believe will increase our costs in
these markets.
|
|
|
Drive the
Benefits of Managing the Business Globally.
|
We continue to focus on restructuring our operations and have
already taken a number of steps to globalize our principal
business functions such as product development, manufacturing,
powertrain and purchasing to improve our performance in an
increasingly competitive environment. As we build functional and
technical excellence, we plan to leverage our products,
powertrains, supplier base and technical expertise globally so
that we can flow our existing resources to support opportunities
for highest returns at the lowest cost.
62
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated
Results of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2008 vs. 2007 Change
|
|
|
2008 vs. 2007 Change
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Net sales and revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automotive sales
|
|
$
|
37,503
|
|
|
$
|
43,002
|
|
|
$
|
117,120
|
|
|
$
|
131,076
|
|
|
$
|
(5,499
|
)
|
|
|
(12.8
|
)%
|
|
$
|
(13,956
|
)
|
|
|
(10.6
|
)%
|
Financial services and insurance revenue
|
|
|
438
|
|
|
|
700
|
|
|
|
1,466
|
|
|
|
2,530
|
|
|
|
(262
|
)
|
|
|
(37.4
|
)%
|
|
|
(1,064
|
)
|
|
|
(42.1
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales and revenue
|
|
|
37,941
|
|
|
|
43,702
|
|
|
|
118,586
|
|
|
|
133,606
|
|
|
|
(5,761
|
)
|
|
|
(13.2
|
)%
|
|
|
(15,020
|
)
|
|
|
(11.2
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automotive cost of sales
|
|
|
34,521
|
|
|
|
41,373
|
|
|
|
116,219
|
|
|
|
121,768
|
|
|
|
(6,852
|
)
|
|
|
(16.6
|
)%
|
|
|
(5,549
|
)
|
|
|
(4.6
|
)%
|
Selling, general and administrative expense
|
|
|
3,251
|
|
|
|
3,601
|
|
|
|
10,704
|
|
|
|
10,205
|
|
|
|
(350
|
)
|
|
|
(9.7
|
)%
|
|
|
499
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
%
|
Financial services and insurance expense
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
640
|
|
|
|
1,475
|
|
|
|
2,334
|
|
|
|
(240
|
)
|
|
|
(37.5
|
)%
|
|
|
(859
|
)
|
|
|
(36.8
|
)%
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
652
|
|
|
|
350
|
|
|
|
4,136
|
|
|
|
925
|
|
|
|
302
|
|
|
|
86.3
|
%
|
|
|
3,211
|
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(883
|
)
|
|
|
(2,262
|
)
|
|
|
(13,948
|
)
|
|
|
(1,626
|
)
|
|
|
1,379
|
|
|
|
61.0
|
%
|
|
|
(12,322
|
)
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
Equity in loss of GMAC LLC
|
|
|
(1,235
|
)
|
|
|
(809
|
)
|
|
|
(4,777
|
)
|
|
|
(874
|
)
|
|
|
(426
|
)
|
|
|
(52.7
|
)%
|
|
|
(3,903
|
)
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
Automotive interest and other expense, net
|
|
|
(464
|
)
|
|
|
(267
|
)
|
|
|
(1,872
|
)
|
|
|
(544
|
)
|
|
|
(197
|
)
|
|
|
(73.8
|
)%
|
|
|
(1,328
|
)
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes, equity
income and minority interests
|
|
|
(2,582
|
)
|
|
|
(3,338
|
)
|
|
|
(20,597
|
)
|
|
|
(3,044
|
)
|
|
|
756
|
|
|
|
22.6
|
%
|
|
|
(17,553
|
)
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
39,186
|
|
|
|
1,029
|
|
|
|
38,805
|
|
|
|
(39,118
|
)
|
|
|
(99.8
|
)%
|
|
|
(37,776
|
)
|
|
|
(97.3
|
)%
|
Equity income, net of tax
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
310
|
|
|
|
440
|
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
(56.1
|
)%
|
|
|
(130
|
)
|
|
|
(29.5
|
)%
|
Minority interests, net of tax
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
(102
|
)
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
(361
|
)
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
156.9
|
%
|
|
|
413
|
|
|
|
114.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations
|
|
|
(2,542
|
)
|
|
|
(42,512
|
)
|
|
|
(21,264
|
)
|
|
|
(41,770
|
)
|
|
|
39,970
|
|
|
|
94.0
|
%
|
|
|
20,506
|
|
|
|
49.1
|
%
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,549
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,760
|
|
|
|
(3,549
|
)
|
|
|
(100.0
|
)%
|
|
|
(3,760
|
)
|
|
|
(100.0
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Loss
|
|
$
|
(2,542
|
)
|
|
$
|
(38,963
|
)
|
|
$
|
(21,264
|
)
|
|
$
|
(38,010
|
)
|
|
$
|
36,421
|
|
|
|
93.5
|
%
|
|
$
|
16,746
|
|
|
|
44.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automotive cost of sales rate
|
|
|
92.0
|
%
|
|
|
96.2
|
%
|
|
|
99.2
|
%
|
|
|
92.9
|
%
|
|
|
(4.2
|
)%
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
%
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
Net margin from net loss
|
|
|
(6.7
|
)%
|
|
|
(89.2
|
)%
|
|
|
(17.9
|
)%
|
|
|
(28.4
|
)%
|
|
|
82.5
|
%
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
%
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
n.m. = not meaningful
|
|
|
Three
and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 Compared to Three
and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007
|
Our Total net sales and revenue decreased by $5.8 billion
(or 13.2%) in the three months ended September 30, 2008,
due to a decline in vehicle sales at GMNA and GME partially
offset by increased vehicle sales at GMLAAM and GMAP.
Our Operating loss improved by $1.4 billion (or 61.0%) to
$0.9 billion in the three months ended September 30,
2008 due to; (1) recording a net curtailment gain of
$4.9 billion, comprised of a curtailment gain of
$6.3 billion related to the UAW hourly medical plan
partially offset by a $1.4 billion curtailment loss related
to the Mitigation Plan; (2) a nonrecurring charge of
$1.3 billion in the corresponding period in 2007 related to
pension prior service costs; and (3) a $0.7 billion
reduction in the accrual for residual support programs for
leased vehicles due to our recent experience related to
dealer/lessee lease buy-outs and improvement in residual values
of fullsize
pick-ups and
sport utility vehicles. These are offset by: (1) the net
effect of changes in volume and product mix of
$2.4 billion; (2) expenses of $1.7 billion
related to the salaried post-65 healthcare settlement;
(3) charges of $0.7 billion related to Delphi; and
(4) $0.6 billion related to GMNA restructuring,
special attrition programs and facility idlings.
63
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Our Loss from continuing operations improved by
$40.0 billion (or 94.0%) to $2.5 billion in the three
months ended September 30, 2008, primarily as a result of
the valuation allowance of $39.0 billion established
against deferred tax assets in the U.S., Canada and Germany in
the corresponding period in 2007. The effect of the valuation
allowance was partially offset by losses related to our
investment in GMAC including our proportionate share of
GMACs loss of $1.2 billion and a $0.3 billion
impairment charge on our Preferred Membership Interests.
In the three months ended June 30, 2008 we determined that
GM Daewoo Auto & Technology Company (GM Daewoo), our
50.9% owned and consolidated Korean subsidiary, included in our
GMAP segment, had been applying hedge accounting to certain
derivative contracts designated as cash flow hedges of
forecasted sales without fully considering whether these sales
were at all times probable of occurring. In accordance with
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 133
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities (SFAS No. 133), gains and losses on
derivatives used to hedge a probable forecasted transaction are
deferred as a component of other comprehensive income and
reclassified into earnings in the period in which the forecasted
transaction occurs. Gains and losses on derivatives related to
forecasted transactions that are not probable of occurring are
required to be recorded in current period earnings. In the three
months ended June 30, 2008, we recognized in Automotive
sales losses of $442 million in Automotive sales
($285 million in Loss from continuing operations before
income taxes) on these derivatives. This included a correction
of our previous accounting by recognizing losses of
$407 million ($262 million in Loss from continuing
operations before income taxes and $150 million after-tax
and after minority interests) on these derivatives which had
been inappropriately deferred in Accumulated other comprehensive
income. Of this amount, $250 million ($163 million in
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes and
$93 million after-tax and after minority interests) should
have been recognized in earnings in the three months ended
March 31, 2008, and the remainder should have been
recognized in prior periods, predominantly in 2007. We have not
restated our condensed consolidated financial statements or
prior annual financial statements because we have concluded that
the effect of correcting for this item and other minor
out-of-period
adjustments is not material to the three months ended
June 30, 2008 and to each of the earlier periods.
Our Total net sales and revenue decreased by $15.0 billion
(or 11.2%) in the nine months ended September 30, 2008, due
to a decline in vehicle sales at GMNA and GME and charges of
$0.9 billion related to declining residual values on
fullsize
pick-up
trucks and sport utility vehicles at GMNA, partially offset by
increases in vehicle sales at GMLAAM and GMAP.
Our Operating loss increased by $12.3 billion to
$13.9 billion in the nine months ended September 30,
2008 due to: (1) changes in vehicle net volume and mix of
$6.7 billion; (2) charges of $5.5 billion related
to GMNA restructuring, special attrition programs, and facility
idlings; (3) charges of $4.1 billion related to
Delphi; (4) expenses of $1.7 billion related to the
salaried post-65 healthcare settlement; and
(5) $0.9 billion increase in the accrual for residual
support programs for leased vehicles due to the decline in
residual values of fullsize
pick-up
trucks and sport utility vehicles. The effect of these items was
mitigated by a net curtailment gain of $4.9 billion
comprised of a curtailment gain of $6.3 billion related to
the UAW hourly medical plan partially offset by a
$1.4 billion curtailment loss related to the Mitigation
Plan and a nonrecurring charge of $1.3 billion in the
corresponding period in 2007 related to pension prior service
costs.
Our Loss from continuing operations improved by
$20.5 billion (or 49.1%) to $21.3 billion in the nine
months ended September 30, 2008 primarily due to the
valuation allowance of $39.0 billion established against
deferred tax assets in the U.S., Canada and Germany in the
corresponding period in 2007. This was partially offset by the
items listed above related to the increase in our Operating loss
of $12.3 billion and losses related to our investment in
GMAC, including our proportionate share of GMACs losses of
$2.7 billion, a $2.0 billion impairment charge on our
Common Membership Interests and $1.0 billion impairment on
our Preferred Membership Interests.
Further details on the results of our businesses and segments is
presented later in this MD&A.
64
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
Changes
in Consolidated Financial Condition
|
|
|
|
Accounts
and Notes Receivable, Net
|
Accounts and notes receivable, net decreased by
$0.2 billion (or 2.0%) to $9.5 billion at
September 30, 2008 from $9.7 billion at
December 31, 2007. This overall decrease was due to:
(1) decreased dividends receivable at GMAP of
$0.3 billion; (2) a decrease of $0.1 billion at
GME due to declining sales volume; and (3) a
$0.1 billion decrease at GMNA due to the release of
Delphis obligation for warranty recovery. These items were
offset by increased receivables at Corporate of
$0.2 billion due to settlement funds receivable from
insurance companies and activity with Delphi.
Accounts and notes receivable, net decreased by
$1.3 billion (or 11.8%) to $9.5 billion at
September 30, 2008 from $10.7 billion at
September 30, 2007. This decrease resulted from lower
receivable balances at GMNA of $0.9 billion, primarily as a
result of a decrease in sales volume. GME decreased by
$0.4 billion primarily due to decreased Value Added Tax
(VAT) receivable.
Inventories increased by $2.0 billion (or 13.2%) to
$16.9 billion at September 30, 2008 from
$14.9 billion at December 31, 2007. GME increased by
$1.1 billion due to a $1.3 billion increase in
inventory build up as a result of normal seasonal fluctuations
from year end levels and the general economic slow down in
Western Europe offset by a $0.3 billion decrease from
Foreign Currency Translation. GMNA inventory increased by
$0.4 billion due to a $0.4 billion increase in
inventory produced for overseas delivery which was in transit at
September 30, 2008 and a $0.2 billion increase due to
Pontiac G8 2009 models manufactured but not yet released to
dealers offset by a $0.2 billion reduction in inventory at
our consolidated dealers. GMLAAM increased by $0.4 billion
due to increased finished vehicle and material inventories in
Brazil and Argentina in anticipation of increased demand in the
local markets, and GMAP increased by $0.1 billion,
primarily related to finished goods.
Inventories increased by $1.4 billion (or 8.9%) to
$16.9 billion at September 30, 2008 from
$15.5 billion at September 30, 2007. GME increased by
$0.6 billion primarily due to $0.9 billion from higher
levels of inventory as a result of the general economic slow
down in Western Europe offset by $0.2 Foreign Currency
Translation. GMAP increased by $0.4 billion due to
$1.0 billion increase in production and finished good
inventories, primarily related to GM Daewoo inventories in Korea
and Russia, offset by $0.6 billion from Foreign Currency
Translation. GMLAAM increased by $0.4 billion due to a
$0.5 billion increase in production volumes and finished
goods offset by $0.1 billion from Foreign Currency
Translation.
|
|
|
Financing
Equipment on Operating Leases, Net
|
Financing equipment on operating leases, net decreased by
$3.8 billion (or 56.9%) from $6.7 billion at
December 31, 2007 and by $5.0 billion (or 63.2%) from
$7.9 billion at September 30, 2007 to
$2.9 billion at September 30, 2008. The decreases are
due to the planned reduction of Equipment on operating leases,
net, which we retained after selling 51% of our equity interest
in GMAC (GMAC Transaction), and the effect of the
$105 million impairment charge discussed below.
The nine months ended September 30, 2008 include a
$105 million impairment charge related to our FIO
segments portfolio of equipment on operating leases. The
impairment charge was the result of our regular review of
residual values related to these leased assets. In the three
months ended June 30, 2008, residual values of fullsize
pick-up
trucks and sport utility vehicles experienced a sudden and
significant decline as a result of a shift in customer
preference to passenger cars and crossover vehicles and away
from fullsize
pick-up
trucks and sport utility vehicles, which was the primary reason
for the impairment charge.
|
|
|
Equity in
Net Assets of GMAC LLC
|
Equity in net assets of GMAC LLC decreased by $5.1 billion
(or 72.5%) to $1.9 billion at September 30, 2008 from
$7.1 billion at December 31, 2007. The decrease is due
to our proportionate share of GMACs losses of
$2.7 billion and impairment charges of $2.0 billion on
our Common Membership Interests.
65
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Equity in net assets of GMAC LLC decreased by $4.9 billion
(or 71.6%) to $1.9 billion at September 30, 2008 from
$6.9 billion at September 30, 2007. The decrease is
due to $3.5 billion of our proportionate share of
GMACs losses and impairment charges on our Common
Membership Interests recorded in the nine months ended
September 30, 2008, offset by a $0.5 billion increase
in our investment due to the 2007 conversion of Preferred
Membership Interests to Common Membership Interests.
|
|
|
Deferred
Income Tax Asset
|
Deferred income tax assets decreased by $1.2 billion (or
57.1%) to $0.9 billion at September 30, 2008 from
$2.1 billion at December 31, 2007. The decrease
resulted from establishing valuation allowances related to
long-term deferred tax assets in Spain and the United Kingdom.
Prepaid pension decreased by $16.6 billion (or 82.1%) to
$3.6 billion at September 30, 2008 from
$20.2 billion at December 31, 2007 and by
$15.3 billion (or 80.9%) from $18.9 billion at
September 30, 2007. These decreases are due to:
(1) losses of $6.3 billion on the hourly and salaried
pension plan asset portfolio; (2) recording a
$2.7 billion liability related to the Settlement Agreement;
(3) recording a $2.7 billion liability due to the
increase in the monthly pension benefit paid to salaried OPEB
plan participants as compensation for the elimination of post-65
healthcare benefits; (4) the transfer of $2.1 billion
of Delphi pension liabilities to us; and (5) recording a
$2.0 billion increase due to the 2008 UAW and IUE-CWA
Special Attrition programs.
|
|
|
Short-term
Borrowings and Current Portion of Long-term Debt
|
Short-term borrowings and current portion of long-term debt
increased by $1.2 billion (or 19.2%) to $7.2 billion
at September 30, 2008 from $6.0 billion at
December 31, 2007. The increase is primarily due to the
reclassification of $1.8 billion of debt from non-current
to current and net increases in secured debt of
$0.5 billion. These increases were offset by payments at
maturity of $0.5 billion and the exchange of
$0.5 billion of convertible debt for our common equity.
Short-term borrowings and current portion of long-term debt
increased by $1.9 billion (or 37.0%) to $7.2 billion
at September 30, 2008 from $5.3 billion at
September 30, 2007. The increase is primarily due to the
reclassification of $3.0 billion of debt from non-current
to current and the increase in secured debt of
$0.5 billion. These increases were offset by payments of
$1.1 billion and the exchange of $0.5 billion of
convertible debt for our common equity.
Financing debt decreased by $3.0 billion (or 61.5%) to
$1.9 billion at September 30, 2008 from
$4.9 billion at December 31, 2007 and by
$4.1 billion (or 68.3%) from $6.0 billion at
September 30, 2007. The decrease is due primarily to the
repayment of debt secured by Equipment on operating leases, net,
which we retained after selling 51% of our equity interest in
GMAC.
Long-term debt increased by $2.7 billion (or 8.0%) to
$36.1 billion at September 30, 2008 from
$33.4 billion at December 31, 2007. The increase is
due to increased borrowings of $4.4 billion under our
$4.5 billion secured revolving credit facility offset by
the normal reclassification of maturing debt of
$1.8 billion from non-current to current.
Long-term debt increased by $1.4 billion (or 4.0%) to
$36.1 billion at September 30, 2008 from
$34.7 billion at September 30, 2007. The increase is
due to increased borrowings of $4.4 billion under our
$4.5 billion secured revolving credit facility offset by
the normal reclassification of maturing debt of
$3.0 billion from non-current to current.
66
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
Postretirement
Benefits Other Than Pensions
|
Postretirement benefits other than pensions decreased by
$13.7 billion (or 28.8%) to $33.7 billion at
September 30, 2008 from $47.4 billion at
December 31, 2007 and by $14.6 billion (or 30.3%) from
$48.3 billion at September 30, 2007. Remeasurements
resulted in decreases of $9.5 billion for our hourly plans
and $3.9 billion for our salaried plans primarily as a
result of the finalization of the Settlement Agreement and the
termination of salaried post-65 healthcare in the three months
ended September 30, 2008.
GMA
Operations Financial Review
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2008 vs. 2007 Change
|
|
|
2008 vs. 2007 Change
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Total net sales and revenue
|
|
$
|
37,503
|
|
|
$
|
43,002
|
|
|
$
|
117,120
|
|
|
$
|
131,076
|
|
|
$
|
(5,499
|
)
|
|
|
(12.8
|
)%
|
|
$
|
(13,956
|
)
|
|
|
(10.6
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automotive cost of sales
|
|
|
35,248
|
|
|
|
41,058
|
|
|
|
116,887
|
|
|
|
121,339
|
|
|
|
(5,810
|
)
|
|
|
(14.2
|
)%
|
|
|
(4,452
|
)
|
|
|
(3.7
|
)%
|
Selling, general and administrative expense
|
|
|
3,202
|
|
|
|
3,300
|
|
|
|
9,920
|
|
|
|
9,578
|
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
|
|
(3.0
|
)%
|
|
|
342
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(947
|
)
|
|
|
(1,356
|
)
|
|
|
(9,687
|
)
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
409
|
|
|
|
30.2
|
%
|
|
|
(9,846
|
)
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
Automotive interest and other expense, net
|
|
|
(111
|
)
|
|
|
(294
|
)
|
|
|
(628
|
)
|
|
|
(886
|
)
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
62.2
|
%
|
|
|
258
|
|
|
|
29.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes, equity
income and minority interests
|
|
|
(1,058
|
)
|
|
|
(1,650
|
)
|
|
|
(10,315
|
)
|
|
|
(727
|
)
|
|
|
592
|
|
|
|
35.9
|
%
|
|
|
(9,588
|
)
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
Equity income, net of tax
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
309
|
|
|
|
438
|
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
(57.0
|
)%
|
|
|
(129
|
)
|
|
|
(29.5
|
)%
|
Minority interests, net of tax
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
(354
|
)
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
164.6
|
%
|
|
|
423
|
|
|
|
119.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
$
|
(947
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,632
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9,937
|
)
|
|
$
|
(643
|
)
|
|
$
|
685
|
|
|
|
42.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
(9,294
|
)
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,549
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,760
|
|
|
$
|
(3,549
|
)
|
|
|
(100.0
|
)%
|
|
$
|
(3,760
|
)
|
|
|
(100.0
|
)%
|
Automotive cost of sales rate
|
|
|
94.0
|
%
|
|
|
95.5
|
%
|
|
|
99.8
|
%
|
|
|
92.6
|
%
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)%
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
|
|
7.2
|
%
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
Net margin from continuing operations before income taxes,
equity income and minority interests
|
|
|
(2.8
|
)%
|
|
|
(3.8
|
)%
|
|
|
(8.8
|
)%
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)%
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
|
|
(8.2
|
)%
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Volume in thousands)
|
Production Volume (a)
|
|
|
2,039
|
|
|
|
2,156
|
|
|
|
6,496
|
|
|
|
6,906
|
|
|
|
(117
|
)
|
|
|
(5.4
|
)%
|
|
|
(410
|
)
|
|
|
(5.9
|
)%
|
Vehicle Sales (b)(c):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industry
|
|
|
16,223
|
|
|
|
17,389
|
|
|
|
52,864
|
|
|
|
53,070
|
|
|
|
(1,165
|
)
|
|
|
(6.7
|
)%
|
|
|
(206
|
)
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)%
|
GM
|
|
|
2,115
|
|
|
|
2,388
|
|
|
|
6,656
|
|
|
|
7,064
|
|
|
|
(273
|
)
|
|
|
(11.4
|
)%
|
|
|
(408
|
)
|
|
|
(5.8
|
)%
|
GM market share Worldwide
|
|
|
13.0
|
%
|
|
|
13.7
|
%
|
|
|
12.6
|
%
|
|
|
13.3
|
%
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)%
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)%
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
n.m. = not meaningful
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Production volume represents the number of vehicles manufactured
by our assembly facilities and also includes vehicles produced
by certain joint ventures. |
(b) |
|
Vehicle sales primarily represent sales to the ultimate customer. |
(c) |
|
Vehicle sales data may include rounding differences. |
67
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
This discussion highlights key changes in operating results
within GMA. The drivers of these changes are discussed in the
regional analyses that follow this section.
|
|
|
Three
and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 Compared to Three
and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
Industry
Global Vehicle Sales
|
Industry vehicle sales decreased in the three months ended
September 30, 2008 by 1.2 million vehicles (or 6.7%)
to 16.2 million vehicles. North America decreased by
766,000 vehicles (or 15.5%) to 4.2 million vehicles; Europe
decreased by 375,000 vehicles (or 6.8%) to 5.2 million
vehicles; and Asia Pacific region decreased by 134,000 vehicles
(or 2.7%) to 4.9 million vehicles. These decreases were
partially offset by industry sales increases in Latin
America/Africa/Mid-East (LAAM) region by 110,000 vehicles (or
5.8%) to 2.0 million vehicles.
Industry vehicle sales decreased in the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 by 206,000 vehicles (or 0.4%) to
52.9 million vehicles. North America decreased by
1.6 million vehicles (or 10.8%) to 13.3 million
vehicles and Europe decreased by 17,000 vehicles (or 0.1%) to
17.4 million vehicles. These decreases were offset by
industry sales increases in Asia Pacific region by 884,000
vehicles (or 5.7%) to 16.3 million vehicles and LAAM region
by 547,000 vehicles (or 10.3%) to 5.8 million vehicles.
Our global vehicle sales decreased in the three months ended
September 30, 2008 by 273,000 vehicles (or 11.4%) as sales
decreased at GMNA by 228,000 vehicles and GME by 64,000, offset
by increases of 11,000 vehicles at GMLAAM and 8,000 vehicles at
GMAP.
Our global vehicle sales decreased in the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 by 408,000 vehicles (or 5.8%) as sales
decreased at GMNA by 573,000 vehicles and at GME by 33,000
vehicles, offset by increases of 117,000 vehicles at GMLAAM and
80,000 vehicles at GMAP.
|
|
|
GM Global
Production Volume
|
Our global production volume decreased in the three months ended
September 30, 2008 by 117,000 vehicles (or 5.4%).
Production volume decreased at GMNA by 105,000 vehicles and GME
of 48,000 vehicles, offset by increases at GMLAAM of 25,000
vehicles and GMAP of 11,000 vehicles.
Our global production volume decreased in the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 by 410,000 vehicles (or 5.9%).
Production volume decreased at GMNA by 591,000 vehicles and GME
of 35,000 vehicles, offset by increases at GMAP of 127,000
vehicles and GMLAAM of 89,000 vehicles.
|
|
|
Total Net
Sales and Revenue
|
Total net sales and revenue decreased in the three months
September 30, 2008 by $5.5 billion (or 12.8%). This
decrease was driven by declines in Total net sales and revenue
of $4.1 billion at GMNA, $1.3 billion at GME,
$0.5 billion at GMAP and $0.4 billion of incremental
inter-segment eliminations offset by an increase of
$0.7 billion at GMLAAM.
Total net sales and revenue decreased in the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 by $14.0 billion (or 10.6%). This
decrease was driven by a decline in Total net sales and revenue
of $17.4 billion at GMNA as well as $0.7 billion in
incremental inter-segment eliminations. The decrease was offset
by increases of $2.7 billion at GMLAAM, $1.2 billion
at GME and $0.2 billion at GMAP.
68
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Automotive cost of sales decreased in the three months ended
September 30, 2008 by $5.8 billion (or 14.2%). This
resulted from decreases of $5.1 billion at GMNA, which
includes a $3.7 billion net gain resulting from
remeasurement of certain OPEB plans, $0.7 billion at GME,
$0.3 billion at GMAP and $0.3 billion of incremental
inter-segment eliminations offset by an increase of
$0.6 billion at GMLAAM.
Automotive cost of sales decreased in the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 by $4.5 billion (or 3.7%). This
decrease resulted from declines in Automotive cost of sales of
$8.5 billion at GMNA primarily related to the
$3.7 billion net gain resulting from remeasurement of
certain OPEB plans and $0.7 billion in incremental
inter-segment eliminations offset by increases of
$2.2 billion at GMLAAM, $1.7 billion at GME and
$0.8 billion at GMAP.
|
|
|
Selling,
General and Administrative Expense
|
Selling, general and administrative expense decreased in the
three months ended September 30, 2008 by $98 million
(or 3.0%). This decrease was the result of decreases of
$138 million at GMNA and $53 million at GME offset by
increases of $54 million at GMAP and $41 million at
GMLAAM.
Selling, general and administrative expense increased in the
nine months ended September 30, 2008 by $342 million
(or 3.6%). This increase was the result of increases of
$200 million at GMAP, $175 million at GME and
$66 million at GMLAAM, offset by a decrease of
$99 million at GMNA.
|
|
|
Automotive
Interest and Other Expense, Net
|
Automotive interest and other expense, net decreased in the
three months ended September 30, 2008 by $183 million
(or 62.2%). This decrease resulted primarily from lower net
interest expense at GMNA of $160 million reflecting lower
interest rates and a tax refund and favorable tax accrual
adjustments at GMLAAM of $79 million offset by lower net
interest income at GMAP of $33 million and higher net
interest expense at GME of $21 million.
Automotive interest and other expense, net decreased in the nine
months ended September 30, 2008 by $258 million (or
29.1%). This decrease resulted from lower interest expense at
GMNA of $372 million and higher interest income at GMLAAM
of $110 million, offset by increased net interest expense
at GME of $152 million and lower interest income at GMAP of
$68 million.
|
|
|
Equity
Income, Net of Tax
|
Equity income, net of tax, in the three months ended
September 30, 2008 decreased by $65 million (or 57.0%)
primarily as a result of $36 million in decreased equity
earnings from investments at GMAP and $32 million in
decreased equity earnings from investments at GMNA.
Equity income, net of tax, in the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 decreased by $129 million (or
29.5%) primarily as a result of $98 million in decreased
equity earnings from investments at GMNA and $47 million in
decreased equity earnings from investments at GMAP offset by
$17 million in increased equity earnings from investments
at GME.
|
|
|
Minority
Interests, Net of Tax
|
Minority interests, net of tax decreased in the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2008 by $158 million (or
164.6%) and $423 million (or 119.5%), respectively. These
decreases resulted from decreased earnings of consolidated
affiliates, most notably at GMAP of $127 million and
$371 million, respectively.
69
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
Income
from Discontinued Operations, Net of Tax
|
In August 2007, we completed the sale of the commercial and
military operations of Allison. Income from discontinued
operations, net of tax, was $3.5 billion and
$3.8 billion in the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2007, respectively.
Supplemental
Categories for Expenses
We evaluate GMA and make certain decisions using supplemental
categories for variable expenses and non-variable expenses. We
believe these categories provide us with useful information and
that investors would also find it beneficial to view the
business in a similar manner.
We believe contribution costs, structural costs and impairment,
restructuring and other charges provide meaningful supplemental
information regarding our expenses because they place GMA
expenses into categories that allow us to assess the cost
performance of GMA. We use these categories to evaluate our
expenses, and believe that these categories allow us to readily
view operating trends, perform analytical comparisons, benchmark
expenses among geographic segments and assess whether the North
American Turnaround Plan and globalization strategy for reducing
costs are on target. We use these categories for forecasting
purposes, evaluating management and determining our future
capital investment allocations. Accordingly, we believe these
categories are useful to investors in allowing for greater
transparency of the supplemental information that we use in our
financial and operational decision-making. These categories of
expenses do not include the results of hedging activities with
respect to interest rates, certain commodity prices and foreign
currency exchange rates and the effect of foreign currency
transactions and translation of financial assets and
liabilities, which are included in Automotive cost of sales but
are analyzed separately.
While we believe that contribution costs, structural costs and
impairment, restructuring and other charges provide useful
information, there are limitations associated with the use of
these categories. Contribution costs, structural costs,
impairment, restructuring and other charges may not be
completely comparable to similarly titled measures of other
companies due to potential differences between companies in the
exact method of calculation. As a result, these categories have
limitations and should not be considered in isolation from, or
as a substitute for, other measures such as Automotive cost of
sales and Selling, general and administrative expense. We
compensate for these limitations by using these categories as
supplements to Automotive cost of sales and Selling, general and
administrative expense.
The total of contribution costs, structural costs, impairment,
restructuring and other charges equals the total of Automotive
cost of sales and Selling, general and administrative expense
for GMA as summarized below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2008 vs. 2007 Change
|
|
|
2008 vs. 2007 Change
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in billions)
|
|
|
Contribution costs (a)
|
|
$
|
27.5
|
|
|
$
|
29.4
|
|
|
$
|
85.6
|
|
|
$
|
90.3
|
|
|
$
|
(1.9
|
)
|
|
|
(6.5
|
)%
|
|
$
|
(4.7
|
)
|
|
|
(5.2
|
)%
|
Structural costs (b)
|
|
|
11.8
|
|
|
|
13.1
|
|
|
|
37.8
|
|
|
|
38.3
|
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)
|
|
|
(9.9
|
)%
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)%
|
Impairment, restructuring and other charges (c)
|
|
|
(1.8
|
)
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
(3.5
|
)
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
80.0
|
%
|
Derivative and certain foreign currency related items (d)
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
(166.7
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
38.5
|
|
|
$
|
44.4
|
|
|
$
|
126.8
|
|
|
$
|
130.9
|
|
|
$
|
(5.9
|
)
|
|
|
(13.3
|
)%
|
|
$
|
(4.1
|
)
|
|
|
(3.1
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automotive cost of sales
|
|
$
|
35.3
|
|
|
$
|
41.1
|
|
|
$
|
116.9
|
|
|
$
|
121.3
|
|
|
$
|
(5.8
|
)
|
|
|
(14.1
|
)%
|
|
$
|
(4.4
|
)
|
|
|
(3.6
|
)%
|
Selling, general and administrative expense
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
9.9
|
|
|
|
9.6
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
(3.0
|
)%
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
38.5
|
|
|
$
|
44.4
|
|
|
$
|
126.8
|
|
|
$
|
130.9
|
|
|
$
|
(5.9
|
)
|
|
|
(13.3
|
)%
|
|
$
|
(4.1
|
)
|
|
|
(3.1
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Contribution costs are expenses that we consider to be variable
with production. The amount of contribution costs included in
Automotive cost of sales was $27.2 billion and
$29.1 billion in the three months ended September 30,
2008 and 2007, respectively, and those costs were comprised of
material cost, freight and policy and warranty expenses. The
amount of contribution costs classified in Selling, general and
administrative expenses was $0.3 billion in each of the
three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007,
respectively, and these costs were incurred primarily in
connection with our dealer advertising programs. The amount of
contribution costs included in Automotive cost of sales was
$84.8 billion and $89.6 billion in the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The amount
of contribution costs classified in Selling, general and
administrative expenses was $0.8 billion and
$0.7 billion in the nine months ended September 30,
2008 and 2007, respectively. |
(b) |
|
Structural costs are expenses that do not generally vary with
production and are recorded in both Automotive cost of sales and
Selling, general and administrative expense. Such costs include
manufacturing labor, pension and OPEB costs, engineering expense
and marketing related costs. Certain costs related to
restructuring and impairments that are included in Automotive
cost of sales are also excluded from structural costs. The
amount of structural costs included in Automotive cost of sales
was $8.9 billion and $10.1 billion in the three months
ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and the
amount of structural costs included in Selling, general and
administrative expense was $2.9 billion and
$3.0 billion in the three months ended September 30,
2008 and 2007, respectively. The amount of structural costs
included in Automotive cost of sales was $28.7 billion and
$29.4 billion in the nine months ended September 30,
2008 and 2007, respectively, and the amount of structural costs
included in Selling, general and administrative expense was
$9.1 billion and $8.9 billion in the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. |
(c) |
|
Impairment, restructuring and other charges are included in
Automotive cost of sales. |
(d) |
|
Derivative and certain foreign currency related items are
included in Automotive cost of sales. |
Contribution costs decreased in the three months ended
September 30, 2008 by $1.9 billion (or 6.5%) compared
to the corresponding period in 2007. The decrease in
contribution costs was driven by lower wholesale deliveries to
dealers, primarily in GMNA and GME, resulting in a reduction of
$2.8 billion. This decrease was offset as Foreign Currency
Translation, due primarily to the weaker U.S. Dollar, increased
costs by $0.5 billion and other factors increased
contribution costs $0.4 billion.
Contribution costs decreased in the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 by $4.7 billion (or 5.2%) compared
to the corresponding period in 2007. Contribution costs
decreased by $9.6 billion due to lower global volumes. This
decrease was partially offset as Foreign Currency Translation
increased contribution costs by $3.6 billion and other
factors, net of favorable material performance, increased
contribution costs by $1.3 billion.
Structural costs in the three months ended September 30,
2008 decreased $1.3 billion (or 9.9%) compared to the
corresponding period in 2007. This decrease was attributable to
savings of $0.6 billion in GMNA related to manufacturing,
retiree pensions and OPEB resulting from productivity
improvements and lower hourly employment levels. Other net cost
reductions of $0.7 billion resulted from several other
factors, including lower incentive compensation and operational
initiatives to defer or reduce overhead.
Structural costs in the nine months ended September 30,
2008 decreased $0.5 billion (or 1.3%) compared to the
corresponding period in 2007. Cost reductions of
$1.8 billion primarily from lower pension, OPEB, and other
manufacturing costs at GMNA were partially offset as foreign
currency translation increased structural costs by
$1.3 billion.
71
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
Restructuring
and Other Charges
|
We recorded certain charges and gains related to restructuring
and other initiatives, which are included in Automotive cost of
sales. Additional details regarding these charges and gains are
included in Notes 10, 14, 15 and 16 to our condensed
consolidated financial statements. The following table
summarizes these charges and gains:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Special attrition programs
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
|
$
|
3,500
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
Restructuring initiatives
|
|
|
620
|
|
|
|
387
|
|
|
|
2,017
|
|
|
|
618
|
|
Asset impairments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
Change in amortization period for pension prior service cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,310
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,310
|
|
Net curtailment gain
|
|
|
(3,684
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,684
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Salaried post-65 healthcare settlement
|
|
|
1,172
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,172
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
584
|
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(1,823
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,730
|
|
|
$
|
3,589
|
|
|
$
|
1,999
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amounts in the three months ended September 30, 2008
are related to the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Charges of $22 million for restructuring initiatives in
GMNA related to special attrition programs, including related
curtailment charges;
|
|
|
Charges of $620 million for restructuring initiatives as
follows: GMNA, $591 million; GME, $29 million;
|
|
|
$3.7 billion net curtailment gain related to the
accelerated recognition of unamortized net prior service credit
due to the Settlement Agreement for the UAW hourly medical plan
becoming effective in the three months ended September 30,
2008; and
|
|
|
Charges of $1.2 billion at GMNA for the settlement loss
associated with the elimination of healthcare coverage for U.S.
salaried retirees over age 65 beginning January 1,
2009 and $47 million of charges for the employees who have
accepted the voluntary Salaried Window Program.
|
The amounts in the three months ended September 30, 2007
are related to the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Charges of $33 million for restructuring initiatives in
GMNA related to special attrition programs, including related
curtailment charges;
|
|
|
Charges of $387 million for restructuring initiatives as
follows: GMNA, $125 million; GME, $262 million; and
|
|
|
Charges of $1.3 billion for additional pension expense
related to the accelerated recognition of unamortized prior
service cost.
|
The amounts in the nine months ended September 30, 2008 are
related to the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Charges of $3.5 billion for restructuring initiatives in
GMNA related to special attrition programs, including related
curtailment charges;
|
|
|
Charges of $2.0 billion for restructuring initiatives as
follows: GMNA, $1.7 billion; GME, $231 million; GMAP,
$98 million; and
|
|
|
$3.7 billion net curtailment gain specific to the
accelerated recognition of unamortized net prior service credits
due to the Settlement Agreement for the UAW hourly medical plan
becoming effective in the nine months ended September 30,
2008; and $1.2 billion of salaried post-65 healthcare
charges noted above; and
|
|
|
Charges of $340 million at GMNA related to our agreement
with the CAW, charges of $197 million at GMNA related to
support we provided to American Axle and charges of
$47 million related to the Salaried Window Program.
|
The amounts in the nine months ended September 30, 2007 are
related to the following:
|
|
|
|
|
$9 million net charge for costs related to the special
attrition programs at GMNA;
|
72
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
|
|
Charges of $618 million for restructuring initiatives as
follows: GMNA, $219 million; GME, $349 million; GMAP,
$50 million;
|
|
|
Charges of $109 million for product specific asset
impairments as follows: GMNA, $95 million; GMAP,
$14 million;
|
|
|
Charges of $1.3 billion for additional pension expense
related to the accelerated recognition of unamortized prior
service cost; and
|
|
|
$47 million adjustment in conjunction with cessation of
production at a previously divested business.
|
|
|
|
Derivative
and Foreign Currency Related Items
|
Results of hedging activities with respect to interest rates,
certain commodity prices and foreign currency exchange rates and
the effect of foreign currency transactions and translation,
with the exception of certain such items reported by GM Daewoo
in Automotive sales, are included in Automotive cost of sales,
but are excluded from structural and contribution costs. Such
costs increased $0.8 billion and decreased
$0.5 billion in the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008, respectively, compared to the
corresponding period in 2007. The increase in the three months
ended September 30, 2008 was the result of a drop in
commodities prices as a result of weakness in demand reflecting
increased risk aversion in the current financial market.
GMA
Regional Results
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2008 vs. 2007 Change
|
|
|
2008 vs. 2007 Change
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
Total net sales and revenue
|
|
$
|
22,544
|
|
|
$
|
26,607
|
|
|
$
|
66,907
|
|
|
$
|
84,327
|
|
|
$
|
(4,063
|
)
|
|
|
(15.3
|
)%
|
|
$
|
(17,420
|
)
|
|
|
(20.7
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automotive cost of sales
|
|
|
20,924
|
|
|
|
26,065
|
|
|
|
71,008
|
|
|
|
79,513
|
|
|
|
(5,141
|
)
|
|
|
(19.7
|
)%
|
|
|
(8,505
|
)
|
|
|
(10.7
|
)%
|
Selling, general and administrative expense
|
|
|
1,883
|
|
|
|
2,021
|
|
|
|
5,723
|
|
|
|
5,822
|
|
|
|
(138
|
)
|
|
|
(6.8
|
)%
|
|
|
(99
|
)
|
|
|
(1.7
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(263
|
)
|
|
|
(1,479
|
)
|
|
|
(9,824
|
)
|
|
|
(1,008
|
)
|
|
|
1,216
|
|
|
|
82.2
|
%
|
|
|
(8,816
|
)
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
Automotive interest and other expense, net
|
|
|
(121
|
)
|
|
|
(281
|
)
|
|
|
(689
|
)
|
|
|
(1,061
|
)
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
56.9
|
%
|
|
|
372
|
|
|
|
35.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes, equity
income and minority interests
|
|
|
(384
|
)
|
|
|
(1,760
|
)
|
|
|
(10,513
|
)
|
|
|
(2,069
|
)
|
|
|
1,376
|
|
|
|
78.2
|
%
|
|
|
(8,444
|
)
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
Equity income (loss), net of tax
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
|
|
(196.0
|
)%
|
Minority interests, net of tax
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
168.8
|
%
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
118.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
$
|
(395
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,766
|
)
|
|
$
|
(10,553
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,062
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,371
|
|
|
|
77.6
|
%
|
|
$
|
(8,491
|
)
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,549
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,760
|
|
|
$
|
(3,549
|
)
|
|
|
(100.0
|
)%
|
|
$
|
(3,760
|
)
|
|
|
(100.0
|
)%
|
Automotive cost of sales rate
|
|
|
92.8
|
%
|
|
|
98.0
|
%
|
|
|
106.1
|
%
|
|
|
94.3
|
%
|
|
|
(5.2
|
)%
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
|
|
11.8
|
%
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
Net margin from continuing operations before income taxes,
equity income and minority interests
|
|
|
(1.7
|
)%
|
|
|
(6.6
|
)%
|
|
|
(15.7
|
)%
|
|
|
(2.5
|
)%
|
|
|
4.9
|
%
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
|
|
(13.2
|
)%
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
73
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2008 vs. 2007 Change
|
|
|
2008 vs. 2007 Change
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(Volume in thousands)
|
Production Volume (a):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cars
|
|
|
436
|
|
|
|
367
|
|
|
|
1,178
|
|
|
|
1,168
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
18.8
|
%
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
Trucks
|
|
|
479
|
|
|
|
653
|
|
|
|
1,456
|
|
|
|
2,057
|
|
|
|
(174
|
)
|
|
|
(26.6
|
)%
|
|
|
(601
|
)
|
|
|
(29.2
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
915
|
|
|
|
1,020
|
|
|
|
2,634
|
|
|
|
3,225
|
|
|
|
(105
|
)
|
|
|
(10.3
|
)%
|
|
|
(591
|
)
|
|
|
(18.3
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vehicle Sales (b)(c):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industry North America
|
|
|
4,185
|
|
|
|
4,951
|
|
|
|
13,323
|
|
|
|
14,943
|
|
|
|
(766
|
)
|
|
|
(15.5
|
)%
|
|
|
(1,620
|
)
|
|
|
(10.8
|
)%
|
GMNA
|
|
|
978
|
|
|
|
1,206
|
|
|
|
2,889
|
|
|
|
3,462
|
|
|
|
(228
|
)
|
|
|
(18.9
|
)%
|
|
|
(573
|
)
|
|
|
(16.5
|
)%
|
GM market share North America
|
|
|
23.4
|
%
|
|
|
24.4
|
%
|
|
|
21.7
|
%
|
|
|
23.2
|
%
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)%
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)%
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
Industry U.S.
|
|
|
3,411
|
|
|
|
4,171
|
|
|
|
10,961
|
|
|
|
12,599
|
|
|
|
(760
|
)
|
|
|
(18.2
|
)%
|
|
|
(1,638
|
)
|
|
|
(13.0
|
)%
|
GM market share U.S. industry
|
|
|
24.3
|
%
|
|
|
25.1
|
%
|
|
|
22.2
|
%
|
|
|
23.6
|
%
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)%
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)%
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
GM cars market share U.S. industry
|
|
|
20.3
|
%
|
|
|
20.8
|
%
|
|
|
18.7
|
%
|
|
|
19.9
|
%
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)%
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)%
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
GM trucks market share U.S. industry
|
|
|
28.4
|
%
|
|
|
28.8
|
%
|
|
|
25.8
|
%
|
|
|
26.7
|
%
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)%
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)%
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
n.m. = not meaningful
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Production volume represents the number of vehicles manufactured
by our assembly facilities and also includes vehicles produced
by certain joint ventures. |
(b) |
|
Vehicle sales primarily represent sales to the ultimate customer. |
(c) |
|
Vehicle sales data may include rounding differences. |
|
|
|
Three
and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 Compared to Three
and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007
|
Industry vehicle sales in North America decreased in the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2008 by 766,000
vehicles (or 15.5%) and 1.6 million vehicles (or 10.8%),
respectively, principally due to weakness in the U.S. economy
resulting from a continued decline in the mortgage and credit
markets, further reductions in housing values and volatile fuel
prices. We expect that the weakness in the U.S. economy will
continue to result in challenging near-term market conditions in
GMNA. Refer to Near-Term Market Challenges in this
MD&A for further discussion.
|
|
|
Total Net
Sales and Revenue
|
Total net sales and revenue decreased in the three months ended
September 30, 2008 by $4.1 billion (or 15.3%) due to a
decline in volumes and unfavorable mix of $4.2 billion
resulting from the current market challenges. In addition, sales
of components, parts and accessories decreased
$0.3 billion. Net price was flat for the period reflecting
improved net pricing on retail sales, particularly on cars,
offset by higher costs associated with rental fleet sales. These
decreases were partially offset by a $0.7 billion reduction
in the accrual for residual support programs for leased vehicles
due to our recent experience related to dealer/lessee lease
buy-outs and improvement in residual values of fullsize
pick-ups and
sport utility vehicles.
Total net sales and revenue decreased in the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 by $17.4 billion (or 20.7%) due to
a decline in volumes and unfavorable mix of $16.1 billion.
In addition, we had a $0.9 billion increase in the accrual
for residual support programs for leased vehicles due to the
decline in residual values of fullsize
pick-up
trucks and sport utility vehicles, unfavorable pricing of
$0.6 billion, and lower sales of components, parts and
accessories of $0.2 billion. These factors were
74
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
partially offset by favorable Foreign Currency Translation of
$0.7 billion due to the strengthening of the Canadian
Dollar in relation to the U.S. Dollar.
The decrease in production volume in the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2008 of 105,000 vehicles (or 10.3%) and
591,000 vehicles (or 18.3%), respectively, was driven by a
reduction in U.S. industry sales volumes and the effect of our
declining market share in the United States.
The decline in our U.S. industry market share in the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2008 of 0.8 and
1.4 percentage points, respectively, reflects macroeconomic
factors including volatile fuel prices and a shift in customer
demand from fullsize
pick-up
trucks and sport utility vehicles to passenger cars and
crossover vehicles and a tightening of the credit markets making
it more difficult for our customers to finance vehicle
purchases. This shift in customer preference was the leading
contributor to the market share losses for us in the U.S. market.
In Canada, in the three months ended September 30, 2008,
industry sales decreased by 2,000 vehicles (or 0.4%) compared to
the corresponding period in 2007. The shift in the Canadian
industry to smaller vehicles coupled with inventory shortages of
small cars and the withdrawal of leasing by GMAC in August, 2008
led to a decrease in our Canada industry market share of 1.5
percentage points. In the nine months ended September 30,
2008, while industry sales were up in Canada by 18,000 vehicles
(or 1.4%), the shift to smaller vehicles and the associated
inventory shortage and the withdrawal of leasing by GMAC in
August, 2008 led to a decrease in our Canada industry market
share of 2.6 percentage points.
Total industry sales in Mexico decreased by 10,000 vehicles (or
3.8%) in the three months ended September 30, 2008, with
our Mexico industry market share remaining the same, due mainly
to growth in the economy and compact car segment. In the nine
months ended September 30, 2008, industry sales in Mexico
decreased slightly by 14,000 vehicles (or 1.7%), and our Mexico
industry market share also decreased slightly by
0.1 percentage points.
Automotive cost of sales decreased in the three months ended
September 30, 2008 by $5.1 billion (or 19.7%) due to:
(1) net curtailment gain of $3.7 billion related to
the Settlement Agreement; (2) decreased costs related to
lower production volumes and the mix of vehicles with lower
sales volume of $2.2 billion; (3) $1.3 billion of
pension prior service costs recorded in 2007;
(4) manufacturing, retiree pension and OPEB savings of
$0.6 billion from lower manufacturing costs and hourly
headcount levels resulting from attrition and productivity
improvements; and (5) favorable Foreign Currency
Translation effects of $0.2 billion. These decreases were
partially offset by: (1) expenses of $1.2 billion
related to the salaried post-65 healthcare settlement;
(2) unfavorable commodity
mark-to-market
adjustments of $1.0 billion; (3) increases in charges
associated with our special attrition program of
$0.5 billion; and (4) increased warranty expenses of
$0.2 billion. Refer to Key Factors Affecting Future
and Current Results in this MD&A for a discussion on
the specific factors related to the 2008 Special Attrition
Programs and facility idlings.
Automotive cost of sales decreased in the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 by $8.5 billion (or 10.7%)
primarily due to: (1) decreased costs related to lower
production volumes and the mix of vehicles with lower sales
volume of $9.4 billion; (2) net curtailment gain of
$3.7 billion related to the Settlement Agreement;
(3) manufacturing, retiree pension and OPEB savings of
$1.6 billion from lower manufacturing costs and hourly
headcount levels resulting from attrition and productivity
improvements; and (4) $1.3 billion of pension prior
service costs recorded in 2007. These decreases were partially
offset by: (1) charges related to restructuring and other
costs associated with our special attrition programs, certain
Canadian facility idlings and finalization of our negotiations
with the CAW of $5.3 billion; (2) expenses of
$1.2 billion related to the salaried post-65 healthcare
settlement; (3) increased Delphi-related charges of
$0.4 billion; (4) increased warranty expenses of
$0.4 billion; and (5) unfavorable commodity
mark-to-market
adjustments of $0.3 billion.
Automotive cost of sales rate decreased to 92.8% from 98.0% and
increased to 106.1% from 94.3% in the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2008, respectively. The three months
ended September 30, 2008 reflected the benefit of the net
curtailment gain recorded related to the Settlement Agreement.
The nine months ended September 30, 2008 reflected a
reduction in structural cost that did not fully offset the
effect of the significant volume decline on revenue.
75
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
Selling,
General and Administrative Expense
|
Selling, general and administrative expense in the three months
ended September 30, 2008 decreased by $138 million (or
6.8%) due to: (1) decreased administrative expenses of
$124 million primarily related to receipt of a
$100 million insurance settlement; (2) reductions in
incentive compensation costs of $69 million; offset by
(3) increased advertising, selling and sales promotion
expenses of $76 million.
Selling, general and administrative expense in the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 decreased by $99 million (or
1.7%) due to: (1) reductions in incentive compensation
costs of $283 million; offset by (2) increased net
legal expenses of $91 million, inclusive of the
$100 million insurance settlement mentioned above;
(3) increased advertising, selling and sales promotion
expenses of $84 million; and (4) less favorable
adjustments to the product liability reserve of $23 million.
|
|
|
Automotive
Interest and Other Expense, Net
|
Automotive interest and other expense, net in the three months
ended September 30, 2008 decreased by $160 million (or
56.9%) due to: (1) decreased interest expense of
$238 million reflecting lower interest rates;
(2) $48 million gain on the sale of our Oklahoma City
facility; offset by (3) decreased interest income of
$136 million driven by lower cash balances.
Automotive interest and other expense, net in the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 decreased by $372 million (or
35.1%) due to: (1) decreased interest expense of
$488 million reflecting lower interest rates;
(2) $48 million gain on the sale of our Oklahoma City
facility; offset by (3) decreased interest income of
$195 million driven by lower cash balances.
|
|
|
Equity
Income (Loss), Net of Tax
|
Equity income (loss), net of tax decreased by $32 million
and by $98 million (or 196.0%), respectively, in the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2008. The three months
ended September 30, 2008, reflected decreased income from
our investments in CAMI Automotive, Inc. (CAMI) as a result of
lower volume and unfavorable adjustment for a tax claim
liability. The nine months ended September 30, 2008,
reflected decreased income from our investments in CAMI as a
result of lower production volume, combined with losses on asset
disposals, and New United Motor Manufacturing, Inc. (NUMMI) as a
result of lower volume and launch related expenses associated
with the January 2008 introduction of the new Pontiac Vibe.
|
|
|
Income
from Discontinued Operations, Net of Tax
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax relates to the
commercial and military operations of Allison. Income from this
business of $3.5 billion and $3.8 billion has been
reported as discontinued operations in the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2007, respectively.
76
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2008 vs. 2007 Change
|
|
|
2008 vs. 2007 Change
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Total net sales and revenue
|
|
$
|
7,482
|
|
|
$
|
8,785
|
|
|
$
|
27,970
|
|
|
$
|
26,768
|
|
|
$
|
(1,303
|
)
|
|
|
(14.8
|
)%
|
|
$
|
1,202
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automotive cost of sales
|
|
|
7,829
|
|
|
|
8,487
|
|
|
|
26,596
|
|
|
|
24,875
|
|
|
|
(658
|
)
|
|
|
(7.8
|
)%
|
|
|
1,721
|
|
|
|
6.9
|
%
|
Selling, general and administrative expense
|
|
|
630
|
|
|
|
683
|
|
|
|
2,190
|
|
|
|
2,015
|
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
(7.8
|
)%
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
8.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(977
|
)
|
|
|
(385
|
)
|
|
|
(816
|
)
|
|
|
(122
|
)
|
|
|
(592
|
)
|
|
|
(153.8
|
)%
|
|
|
(694
|
)
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
Automotive interest and other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
(122
|
)
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
(100.0
|
)%
|
|
|
(152
|
)
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes, equity
income and minority interests
|
|
|
(1,019
|
)
|
|
|
(406
|
)
|
|
|
(938
|
)
|
|
|
(92
|
)
|
|
|
(613
|
)
|
|
|
(151.0
|
)%
|
|
|
(846
|
)
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
Equity income, net of tax
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
30.0
|
%
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
56.7
|
%
|
Minority interests, net of tax
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
$
|
(1,003
|
)
|
|
$
|
(398
|
)
|
|
$
|
(908
|
)
|
|
$
|
(79
|
)
|
|
$
|
(605
|
)
|
|
|
(152.0
|
)%
|
|
$
|
(829
|
)
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automotive cost of sales rate
|
|
|
104.6
|
%
|
|
|
96.6
|
%
|
|
|
95.1
|
%
|
|
|
92.9
|
%
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
Net margin from continuing operations before income taxes,
equity income and minority interests
|
|
|
(13.6
|
)%
|
|
|
(4.6
|
)%
|
|
|
(3.4
|
)%
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)%
|
|
|
(9.0
|
)%
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
|
|
(3.1
|
)%
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Volume in thousands)
|
Production Volume (a)
|
|
|
348
|
|
|
|
396
|
|
|
|
1,336
|
|
|
|
1,371
|
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
(12.1
|
)%
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
(2.6
|
)%
|
Vehicle Sales (b)(c):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industry Europe
|
|
|
5,158
|
|
|
|
5,533
|
|
|
|
17,353
|
|
|
|
17,370
|
|
|
|
(375
|
)
|
|
|
(6.8
|
)%
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)%
|
GM Europe
|
|
|
459
|
|
|
|
523
|
|
|
|
1,621
|
|
|
|
1,653
|
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
(12.3
|
)%
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
(2.0
|
)%
|
GM market share Europe
|
|
|
8.9
|
%
|
|
|
9.5
|
%
|
|
|
9.3
|
%
|
|
|
9.5
|
%
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)%
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)%
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
GM market share Germany
|
|
|
8.4
|
%
|
|
|
9.4
|
%
|
|
|
9.0
|
%
|
|
|
9.5
|
%
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)%
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)%
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
GM market share United Kingdom
|
|
|
14.9
|
%
|
|
|
14.8
|
%
|
|
|
15.2
|
%
|
|
|
15.2
|
%
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
GM market share Russia
|
|
|
9.5
|
%
|
|
|
9.1
|
%
|
|
|
10.9
|
%
|
|
|
9.4
|
%
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
n.m. = not meaningful
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Production volume represents the number of vehicles manufactured
by our assembly facilities and also includes vehicles produced
by certain joint ventures. |
(b) |
|
Vehicle sales primarily represent sales to the ultimate
customer, including unit sales of Chevrolet brand products in
the region. The financial results from sales of Chevrolet brand
products are reported as part of GMAP, because those vehicles
are sold by GM Daewoo. |
(c) |
|
Vehicle sales data may include rounding differences. |
|
|
|
Three
and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 Compared to Three
and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007
|
Industry vehicle sales decreased in the three months ended
September 30, 2008 by 375,000 vehicles (or 6.8%) which
primarily resulted from a 150,000 vehicle (or 34.5%) decrease in
Spain and decreases of 144,000 vehicles (or 18.5%) in the
77
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
United Kingdom, 72,000 vehicles (or 12.7%) in Italy and 22,000
vehicles (or 2.6%) in Germany. These decreases were partially
offset by a 70,000 vehicle (or 9.7%) increase in Russia.
Industry vehicle sales decreased in the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 by 17,000 vehicles (or 0.1%) which
primarily resulted from similar trends in the same markets with
a 343,000 vehicle (or 23.5%) decrease in Spain and decreases of
235,000 vehicles (or 11.0%) in Italy, and 157,000 vehicles (or
7.0%) in the United Kingdom primarily offset by an increase of
437,000 vehicles (or 22.9%) in Russia, 130,000 vehicles (or
32.3%) in Ukraine, 70,000 vehicles (or 3.7%) in France, and
43,000 vehicles (or 1.7%) in Germany.
|
|
|
Total Net
Sales and Revenue
|
Total net sales and revenue decreased in the three months ended
September 30, 2008 by $1.3 billion (or 14.8%) due to:
(1) unfavorable effect of $1.2 billion due to lower
volume; (2) unfavorable product mix of $0.3 billion
caused primarily by increasing relative volume of lower priced
vehicles such as the Opel Agila; offset by (3) favorable
effect of $0.4 billion in Foreign Currency Translation,
driven mainly by the strengthening of the Euro and Swedish Krona
versus the U.S. Dollar.
Total net sales and revenue increased in the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 by $1.2 billion (or 4.5%) due to:
(1) favorable effect of $2.5 billion in Foreign
Currency Translation, driven mainly by the strengthening of the
Euro and Swedish Krona versus the U.S. Dollar;
(2) increased remarketing revenue due to higher rental car
activity of $0.2 billion; offset by
(3) $0.9 billion due to lower volume; and
(4) unfavorable product mix of $0.7 billion due to the
same factors experienced in the three months ended
September 30, 2008 mentioned above.
GMEs wholesale sales, which exclude sales of Chevrolet
brand products sold by GM Daewoo, decreased by 66,000 vehicles
(or 15.3%) in the three months ended September 30, 2008.
Wholesale volumes decreased most significantly in the United
Kingdom, by 18,000 vehicles (or 16.2%), in Spain, by 17,000
vehicles (or 57.6%), and in Germany by 10,000 vehicles (or
14.1%), while wholesale volumes increased by 10,000 vehicles (or
50.3%) in Russia. The remainder of the change resulted from
smaller decreases in countries such as Italy and France, sales
to North America, and European sales of vehicles imported from
the United States.
GMEs wholesale sales, which exclude sales of Chevrolet
brand products sold by GM Daewoo, decreased by 41,000 vehicles
(or 3.0%) in the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
Wholesale volumes decreased most significantly in Spain, by
41,000 vehicles (or 39.0%), by 25,000 vehicles (or 17.2%) in
Italy, and by 21,000 vehicles (or 6.5%) in the United Kingdom,
while wholesale volumes increased by 35,000 vehicles (or 72.8%)
in Russia. The remainder of the change resulted from smaller
decreases in countries such as Ireland and the Netherlands, and
increased sales to North America.
Automotive cost of sales decreased in the three months ended
September 30, 2008 by $0.7 billion (or 7.8%) due to:
(1) $0.9 billion related to lower volume;
(2) favorable product mix of $0.2 billion due to the
movement away from higher cost vehicles; (3) favorable
material costs of $0.2 billion; (4) improvement in
manufacturing related costs of $0.1 billion; offset by
(5) unfavorable Foreign Currency Translation effect of
$0.8 billion.
Automotive cost of sales increased in the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 by $1.7 billion (or 6.9%) due to:
(1) unfavorable Foreign Currency Translation effect of
$2.9 billion; offset by (2) $0.7 billion related
to lower volume; and (3) favorable product mix of
$0.5 billion.
Automotive cost of sales rate worsened in the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2008 to 104.6% from 96.6% and to
95.1% from 92.9%, respectively, primarily due to the
disproportional effect of Foreign Currency Translation on Total
net sales and revenue and Automotive cost of sales.
78
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
Selling,
General, and Administrative Expense
|
Selling, general and administrative expense decreased in the
three months ended September 30, 2008 by $53 million
(or 7.8%) due to decreased sales and marketing expenses of
$75 million and other structural cost savings of
$7 million, partially offset by unfavorable Foreign
Currency Translation of $28 million.
Selling, general and administrative expense increased in the
nine months ended September 30, 2008 by $175 million
(or 8.7%) due primarily to unfavorable Foreign Currency
Translation of $172 million.
|
|
|
Automotive
Interest and Other Income (Expense), Net
|
Automotive interest and other income (expense), net decreased in
the nine months ended September 30, 2008 by
$152 million primarily related to a VAT refund received in
2007.
|
|
|
GM
Latin America/Africa/Mid-East
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2008 vs. 2007 Change
|
|
|
2008 vs. 2007 Change
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Total net sales and revenue
|
|
$
|
5,681
|
|
|
$
|
4,944
|
|
|
$
|
15,553
|
|
|
$
|
12,854
|
|
|
$
|
737
|
|
|
|
14.9
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,699
|
|
|
|
21.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automotive cost of sales
|
|
|
4,966
|
|
|
|
4,333
|
|
|
|
13,535
|
|
|
|
11,344
|
|
|
|
633
|
|
|
|
14.6
|
%
|
|
|
2,191
|
|
|
|
19.3
|
%
|
Selling, general and administrative expense
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
237
|
|
|
|
777
|
|
|
|
711
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
17.3
|
%
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
9.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
437
|
|
|
|
374
|
|
|
|
1,241
|
|
|
|
799
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
16.8
|
%
|
|
|
442
|
|
|
|
55.3
|
%
|
Automotive interest and other income, net
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
236
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
87.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes, equity
income and minority interests
|
|
|
517
|
|
|
|
375
|
|
|
|
1,477
|
|
|
|
925
|
|
|
|
142
|
|
|
|
37.9
|
%
|
|
|
552
|
|
|
|
59.7
|
%
|
Equity income, net of tax
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(11.1
|
)%
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(4.3
|
)%
|
Minority interests, net of tax
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(10.0
|
)%
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
$
|
514
|
|
|
$
|
374
|
|
|
$
|
1,476
|
|
|
$
|
924
|
|
|
$
|
140
|
|
|
|
37.4
|
%
|
|
$
|
552
|
|
|
|
59.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automotive cost of sales rate
|
|
|
87.4
|
%
|
|
|
87.6
|
%
|
|
|
87.0
|
%
|
|
|
88.3
|
%
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)%
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)%
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
Net margin from continuing operations before income taxes,
equity income and minority interests
|
|
|
9.1
|
%
|
|
|
7.6
|
%
|
|
|
9.5
|
%
|
|
|
7.2
|
%
|
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Volume in thousands)
|
Production Volume (a)
|
|
|
276
|
|
|
|
251
|
|
|
|
795
|
|
|
|
706
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
12.6
|
%
|
Vehicle Sales (b)(c):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industry LAAM
|
|
|
2,009
|
|
|
|
1,899
|
|
|
|
5,840
|
|
|
|
5,293
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
%
|
|
|
547
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
%
|
GMLAAM
|
|
|
342
|
|
|
|
330
|
|
|
|
1,012
|
|
|
|
895
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
13.1
|
%
|
GM market share LAAM
|
|
|
17.0
|
%
|
|
|
17.4
|
%
|
|
|
17.3
|
%
|
|
|
16.9
|
%
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)%
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
GM market share Brazil
|
|
|
19.8
|
%
|
|
|
20.9
|
%
|
|
|
20.2
|
%
|
|
|
20.4
|
%
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)%
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)%
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
n.m. = not meaningful
79
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Production volume represents the number of vehicles manufactured
by our assembly facilities and also includes vehicles produced
by certain joint ventures. |
(b) |
|
Vehicle sales primarily represent sales to the ultimate customer. |
(c) |
|
Vehicle sales data may include rounding differences. |
|
|
|
Three
and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 Compared to Three
and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007
|
Industry vehicle sales in the LAAM region increased in the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2008 by 110,000
vehicles (or 5.8%) and 547,000 vehicles (or 10.3%),
respectively, due to strong growth throughout the region.
In the three months ended September 30, 2008, growth was
attributable to increases in Brazil of 145,000 vehicles (or
22.1%), the Mid-East (excluding Israel) of 16,000 vehicles (or
4.0%), Peru of 14,000 vehicles (or 105.9%), Argentina of 12,000
vehicles (or 7.6%), and Ecuador of 12,000 vehicles (or 56.5%),
offset by declines in Venezuela of 75,000 vehicles (or 56.3%),
South Africa of 37,000 vehicles (or 23.2%), and in Colombia of
8,000 vehicles (or 12.6%).
In the nine months ended September 30, 2008, growth was
attributable to increases in Brazil of 470,000 vehicles (or
27.0%), the Mid-East (excluding Israel) of 64,000 vehicles (or
5.4%), Argentina of 52,000 vehicles (or 11.3%), Egypt of 49,000
vehicles (or 30.1%), and Peru of 34,000 vehicles (or 95.6%),
offset by declines in Venezuela of 133,000 vehicles (or 38.6%),
South Africa of 83,000 vehicles (or 17.7%), and in Colombia of
17,000 vehicles (or 9.0%).
|
|
|
Total Net
Sales and Revenue
|
Total net sales and revenue increased in the three months ended
September 30, 2008 by $0.7 billion (or 14.9%)
primarily due to: (1) favorable vehicle pricing of
$0.3 billion; (2) favorable product mix of
$0.2 billion; (3) favorable effect of Foreign Currency
Translation of $0.1 billion, primarily related to the
Brazilian Real and Colombian Peso; and
(4) $0.1 billion in increased volumes across GMLAAM
business units, including increased revenue in Brazil, Ecuador
and the Mid-East, offset by decreases in Venezuela, Colombia and
South Africa.
Total net sales and revenue increased in the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 by $2.7 billion (or 21.0%) due to:
(1) favorable effect of Foreign Currency Translation of
$0.8 billion, primarily related to the Brazilian Real and
Colombian Peso; (2) $0.7 billion in increased volumes
across most GMLAAM business units; (3) favorable vehicle
pricing of $0.6 billion; and (4) $0.5 billion of
favorable product mix in our vehicle portfolio.
Automotive cost of sales increased in the three months ended
September 30, 2008 by $0.6 billion (or 14.6%) due to:
(1) unfavorable product mix of $0.2 billion;
(2) increased content cost of $0.2 billion; and
(3) unfavorable Foreign Currency Translation effect of
$0.2 billion.
Automotive cost of sales increased in the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 by $2.2 billion (or 19.3%) due to:
(1) unfavorable Foreign Currency Translation of
$0.8 billion; (2) unfavorable product mix of
$0.4 billion; (3) increased volume in the region of
$0.3 billion; (4) increased content cost of
$0.3 billion; and (5) foreign exchange transaction
losses on purchases of Treasury bills in Venezuela resulting in
an increase of $0.1 billion.
Automotive cost of sales rate decreased in the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2008 to 87.4% from 87.6% and to
87.0% from 88.3%, respectively, due to higher pricing and
favorable product mix.
80
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
Selling,
General and Administrative Expense
|
Selling, general and administrative expense increased in the
three months ended September 30, 2008 by $41 million
(or 17.3%) due to: (1) increase of $20 million in
marketing, commercial and other administrative expenses across a
majority of business units throughout the region;
(2) unfavorable Foreign Currency Translation of
$14 million; and (3) unfavorable increase in the cost
of these expenses of $8 million.
Selling, general and administrative expense increased in the
nine months ended September 30, 2008 by $66 million
(or 9.3%), resulting from: (1) unfavorable Foreign Currency
Translation of $65 million; (2) increase of
$36 million in commercial and other administrative expenses
due to general market expansion throughout most of the region;
(3) unfavorable increase in the cost of these expenses of
$24 million; offset by (4) decrease of
$58 million in marketing, commercial and other
administrative expenses at General Motors do Brasil Ltd. (GM do
Brasil).
|
|
|
Automotive
Interest and Other Income, Net
|
Automotive interest and other income, net increased in the three
months ended September 30, 2008 by $79 million due to:
(1) net increase of $89 million at GM do Brasil
attributable to a net gain of $24 million from a favorable
tax case decision resulting in a refund of tax overpayments made
in prior years, a favorable tax accrual adjustment resulting in
a decrease of $20 million in tax expenses and a
non-recurring charge recorded in the corresponding period in
2007 of $45 million for potential taxes related to matters
concerning improperly registered material included in
consignment contracts; (2) increase of $9 million in
net interest income at General Motors Venezolana, C.A. (GM
Venezolana) from additional cash on hand; offset by
(3) increase of $17 million in interest expense across
the majority of business units throughout the region.
Automotive interest and other income, net increased in the nine
months ended September 30, 2008 by $110 million (or
87.3%) due to: (1) net increase of $89 million
attributable to the items mentioned above in the three months
ended September 30, 2008; (2) increase of
$28 million in net interest income at GM Venezolana from
additional cash on hand; (3) favorable effect of Foreign
Currency Translation of $19 million; offset by
(4) increase of $23 million in interest expense across
majority of business units throughout the region.
81
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2008 vs. 2007 Change
|
|
|
2008 vs. 2007 Change
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Total net sales and revenue
|
|
$
|
4,766
|
|
|
$
|
5,280
|
|
|
$
|
15,220
|
|
|
$
|
14,975
|
|
|
$
|
(514
|
)
|
|
|
(9.7
|
)%
|
|
$
|
245
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automotive cost of sales
|
|
|
4,447
|
|
|
|
4,765
|
|
|
|
14,226
|
|
|
|
13,433
|
|
|
|
(318
|
)
|
|
|
(6.7
|
)%
|
|
|
793
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
%
|
Selling, general and administrative expense
|
|
|
409
|
|
|
|
355
|
|
|
|
1,222
|
|
|
|
1,022
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
15.2
|
%
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
19.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(90
|
)
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
(228
|
)
|
|
|
520
|
|
|
|
(250
|
)
|
|
|
(156.3
|
)%
|
|
|
(748
|
)
|
|
|
(143.8
|
)%
|
Automotive interest and other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
|
|
(68
|
)
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes,
equity income and minority interests
|
|
|
(115
|
)
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
(272
|
)
|
|
|
544
|
|
|
|
(283
|
)
|
|
|
(168.5
|
)%
|
|
|
(816
|
)
|
|
|
(150.0
|
)%
|
Equity income, net of tax
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
335
|
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
(41.9
|
)%
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
(14.0
|
)%
|
Minority interests, net of tax
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
(68
|
)
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
(270
|
)
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
186.8
|
%
|
|
|
371
|
|
|
|
137.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income tax
|
|
$
|
(6
|
)
|
|
$
|
186
|
|
|
$
|
117
|
|
|
$
|
609
|
|
|
$
|
(192
|
)
|
|
|
(103.2
|
)%
|
|
$
|
(492
|
)
|
|
|
(80.8
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automotive cost of sales rate
|
|
|
93.3
|
%
|
|
|
90.2
|
%
|
|
|
93.5
|
%
|
|
|
89.7
|
%
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
Net margin from continuing operations before income taxes,
equity income and minority interests
|
|
|
(2.4
|
)%
|
|
|
3.2
|
%
|
|
|
(1.8
|
)%
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
|
|
(5.6
|
)%
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
|
|
(5.4
|
)%
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Volume in thousands)
|
Production Volume (a)(b)
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
489
|
|
|
|
1,731
|
|
|
|
1,604
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
7.9
|
%
|
Vehicle Sales (a)(c)(e):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industry Asia Pacific
|
|
|
4,871
|
|
|
|
5,005
|
|
|
|
16,348
|
|
|
|
15,464
|
|
|
|
(134
|
)
|
|
|
(2.7
|
)%
|
|
|
884
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
%
|
GMAP
|
|
|
336
|
|
|
|
327
|
|
|
|
1,134
|
|
|
|
1,054
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
%
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
7.6
|
%
|
GM market share Asia Pacific (d)
|
|
|
6.9
|
%
|
|
|
6.5
|
%
|
|
|
6.9
|
%
|
|
|
6.8
|
%
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
GM market share Australia
|
|
|
13.5
|
%
|
|
|
14.2
|
%
|
|
|
12.9
|
%
|
|
|
14.6
|
%
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)%
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
|
|
(1.7
|
)%
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
GM market share China (d)
|
|
|
12.2
|
%
|
|
|
11.5
|
%
|
|
|
12.0
|
%
|
|
|
12.1
|
%
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)%
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
n.m. = not meaningful
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes GM Daewoo, Shanghai GM and SAIC-GM-Wuling Automobile
Co., Ltd. (SGMW) joint venture production/sales. We own 34% of
SGMW and under the joint venture agreement have significant
rights as a member as well as the contractual right to report
SGMW sales in China as part of our global market share. |
(b) |
|
Production volume represents the number of vehicles manufactured
by our assembly facilities and also includes vehicles produced
by certain joint ventures. |
(c) |
|
Vehicle sales primarily represent sales to the ultimate customer. |
(d) |
|
Includes SGMW joint venture sales. |
(e) |
|
Vehicle sales data may include rounding differences. |
82
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
Three
and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 Compared to Three
and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007
|
Industry vehicle sales in the Asia Pacific region decreased in
the three months ended September 30, 2008 by 134,000
vehicles (or 2.7%) across all markets driven by volatile fuel
prices, inflation and the recent turmoil in the global credit
markets.
Industry vehicle sales decreased in the three months ended
September 30, 2008 by 44,000 vehicles (or 3.4%) in Japan,
32,000 vehicles (or 1.6%) in China, 23,000 vehicles (or 7.4%) in
South Korea, 16,000 vehicles (or 6.1%) in Australia and 15,000
vehicles (or 9.7%) in Thailand.
Industry vehicle sales in the Asia Pacific region increased in
the nine months ended September 30, 2008 by 884,000
vehicles (or 5.7%), driven by growth in China, Indonesia, India,
and Malaysia. However, general economic conditions have caused
the momentum to moderate.
Industry vehicle sales increased in the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 by 705,000 vehicles (or 11.3%) in China,
134,000 vehicles (or 42.2%) in Indonesia, 102,000 vehicles (or
6.9%) in India and 64,000 vehicles (or 17.8%) in Malaysia. These
increases were offset as Japan decreased by 100,000 vehicles (or
2.4%) and Taiwan decreased by 68,000 vehicles (or 27.2%).
|
|
|
Total Net
Sales and Revenue
|
Total net sales and revenue decreased in the three months ended
September 30, 2008 by $0.5 billion (or 9.7%) due to:
(1) unfavorable effect of $0.3 billion for the change
in fair value of foreign exchange derivatives not designated as
hedges at GM Daewoo; (2) unfavorable mix of
$0.1 billion mainly from deterioration in outside sales
volumes at GM Daewoo; and (3) unfavorable net pricing of
$0.1 billion at GM Daewoo.
Total net sales and revenue increased in the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 by $0.2 billion (or 1.6%) due to:
(1) $0.9 billion increase driven primarily by growth
in export volumes at GM Daewoo and GM Holden, along with higher
domestic volumes across most GMAP business units; offset by
(2) unfavorable effect of $0.3 billion for the change
in fair value of foreign exchange derivatives not designated as
hedges at GM Daewoo; and (3) unfavorable $0.4 billion
immaterial adjustment related to correcting our hedge accounting
practices. Refer to Note 19 to the condensed consolidated
financial statements for further information regarding our
hedging adjustment.
Automotive cost of sales decreased in the three months ended
September 30 2008 by $0.3 billion (or 6.7%) due to
favorable Foreign Currency Translation of $0.4 billion at
GM Daewoo partially offset by unfavorable Foreign Currency
Translation of $0.1 billion related to the Australian
Dollar. Increased volume of $0.1 billion at GM Holden and
our subsidiaries in Thailand was offset by a decline in GM
Daewoo export volumes.
Automotive cost of sales increased in the nine months ended
September 30 2008 by $0.8 billion (or 5.9%) driven by:
(1) unfavorable volume and mix of $1.0 billion;
(2) unfavorable Foreign Currency Translation of
$0.3 billion related to the Australian Dollar; and
(3) increased other expenses of $0.1 billion primarily
related to engineering expense at GM Daewoo; offset by
(4) favorable Foreign Currency Translation at GM Daewoo of
$0.6 billion.
Automotive cost of sales rate increased in the three months
ended September 30, 2008 to 93.3% from 90.2% as the
reduction in production cost from volume decline did not fully
offset the increase in structural cost included in Automotive
cost of sales.
Automotive cost of sales rate increased in the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 to 93.5% from 89.7% as increased
structural costs in Automotive cost of sales outpaced the
increase in Total net sales and revenue, which included an
unfavorable adjustment related to correcting our hedge
accounting practices mentioned above.
83
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
Selling,
General and Administrative Expense
|
Selling, general and administrative expense increased in the
three months ended September 30 2008 by $54 million (or
15.2%) due to increased selling expenses of $29 million,
primarily at GM Daewoo and GM Holden and increased general
administrative expenses of $24 million in line with the
expanded operations across various business units in the region.
Selling, general and administrative expense increased in the
nine months ended September 30 2008 by $200 million (or
19.6%) due to increased selling expenses of $111 million,
primarily at GM Daewoo and GM Holden and increased general
administrative expenses of $87 million in line with the
expanded operations across various business units in the region.
|
|
|
Automotive
Interest and Other Income (Expense), Net
|
Automotive interest and other income (expense), net decreased in
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 by
$33 million and $68 million, respectively, due to
lower interest income.
|
|
|
Equity
Income, Net of Tax
|
Equity income, net of tax decreased in the three months ended
September 30, 2008 by $36 million (or 41.9%) due to a
decline in our China joint ventures income resulting
primarily from decreased volume and mix of $35 million and
sales allowances of $24 million. These decreases in income
were partially offset by decreased material costs of
$24 million.
Equity income, net of tax decreased in the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 by $47 million or (14.0%) due to a
decline in our China joint ventures income resulting
primarily from sales allowances of $113 million and
unfavorable mix of $44 million. These decreases in income
were partially offset by decreased material costs of
$70 million, decreased contribution costs of
$24 million and increased volume of $23 million.
|
|
|
Minority
Interests, Net of Tax
|
Minority interests, net of tax decreased in the three and nine
months ended September 30 2008 by $0.1 billion (or 186.8%)
and $0.4 billion (or 137.4%) due to decline in GM Daewoo
income.
FIO
Financial Review
Our FIO business includes our share of the operating results of
GMACs lines of business consisting of Automotive Finance
Operations, Mortgage Operations, Insurance, and Other, which
includes GMACs Commercial Finance business and GMACs
equity investment in Capmark Financial Group. Also included in
FIO are two special purpose entities holding automotive leases
previously owned by GMAC and its affiliates that we retained in
connection with the divestiture of our 51% equity interest in
GMAC in fiscal year 2006.
At December 31, 2007 we disclosed that we did not believe
our investment in GMAC was impaired; however, there were many
economic factors which were unstable at that time. Such factors
included the instability of the global credit and mortgage
markets, deteriorating conditions in the residential and home
building markets, and credit downgrades of GMAC and GMACs
subsidiary, Residential Capital, LLC (ResCap).
Through June 30, 2008 the economic factors mentioned above
deteriorated beyond our previous expectations. The instability
in the global credit and mortgage markets increased in North
America and spread throughout Europe, and the residential and
homebuilding markets continued to deteriorate in both
continents. These factors were exacerbated by the increase in
the cost of fuel, which lead to a decline in consumer demand for
automobiles, particularly fullsize
pick-up
trucks and sport utility vehicles. This negatively affected
GMACs North American automotive business, as the decline
in certain residual values resulted in an impairment of vehicles
on operating leases, and an overall decline in automotive sales
resulted in a decline in the leasing and financing of vehicles.
84
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
In the three months ended September 30, 2008 the
instability of the credit markets intensified in North America
and Europe and resulted in an extreme lack of liquidity in the
global credit markets resulting in prominent North American
financial institutions declaring bankruptcy, being seized by the
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), or being sold at
distressed valuations.
These economic factors negatively affected GMACs North
American automotive business as well as ResCaps
residential mortgage business, which resulted in significant
losses for both GMACs North American automotive operations
and ResCap. Additionally, it was necessary for GMAC to continue
to provide support to ResCap, and GMACs and ResCaps
credit ratings were each further downgraded several times.
Based on these factors, we believed that a decline in value of
our investment in GMAC occurred in each of the three month
periods ended March 31, June 30 and September 30,
2008. Accordingly, we performed an assessment in accordance with
the provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion (APB)
No. 18, The Equity Method of Accounting for
Investments in Common Stock (APB No. 18), to
determine whether this decline in value was other than
temporary. We concluded that certain of the declines were
other than temporary and, accordingly, we reduced the carrying
value of our investments to fair value as determined in
accordance with SFAS No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements (SFAS No. 157). Our conclusions
were reached after considering the severity of the impairment
and whether the value would recover in a reasonable period.
Continued low or decreased demand for automobiles, continued or
increased instability of the global credit and mortgage markets,
the lack of available credit, or a recession in North America,
Europe, South America or Asia could further negatively affect
GMACs lines of business, and result in future impairments
of our investment in GMAC Common and Preferred Membership
Interests. Additionally, as GMAC provides financing to our
dealers as well as retail purchasers of our vehicles, further
deterioration in these economic factors could cause our vehicle
sales to decline. However, such declines may not result in
further impairment charges if we determine they are temporary.
The following table summarizes the impairment charges we have
recorded against our investment in GMAC Common and Preferred
Membership Interests:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
GMAC Common Membership Interests
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,036
|
|
GMAC Preferred Membership Interests
|
|
|
251
|
|
|
|
1,001
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
251
|
|
|
$
|
3,037
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
The following table summarizes the activity with respect to our
investment in GMAC Common and Preferred Membership Interests:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMAC Common
|
|
|
GMAC Preferred
|
|
|
|
Membership Interests
|
|
|
Membership Interests
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2008
|
|
$
|
7,079
|
|
|
$
|
1,044
|
|
Our proportionate share of GMACs losses
|
|
|
(302
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment charges
|
|
|
(1,310
|
)
|
|
|
(142
|
)
|
Other, primarily Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
(76
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2008
|
|
|
5,391
|
|
|
|
902
|
|
Our proportionate share of GMACs losses
|
|
|
(1,204
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment charges
|
|
|
(726
|
)
|
|
|
(608
|
)
|
Other, primarily Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2008
|
|
|
3,454
|
|
|
|
294
|
|
Our proportionate share of GMACs losses
|
|
|
(1,235
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(251
|
)
|
Other, primarily Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
(270
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
1,949
|
|
|
$
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the three months ended June 30, 2008, residual values of
sport utility vehicles and fullsize
pick-up
trucks experienced a sudden and significant decline as a result
of a shift in customer preference to passenger cars and
crossover vehicles and away from sport utility vehicles and
fullsize
pick-up
trucks. In addition, in the three months ended
September 30, 2008 residual values of fullsize
pick-up
trucks in Canada continued to significantly decline. This
decline in residual values is the primary factor responsible for
the impairment charge of $0.8 billion and $0.1 billion
recorded by GMAC and our FIO segment, respectively, in the nine
months ended September 30, 2008 related to Equipment on
operating leases, net. In addition to the impairment charges
recorded, GMNA increased residual support and risk sharing
accruals by $0.9 billion related to its obligations under
residual support and risk sharing agreements related to
Equipment on operating leases, net.
|
|
|
Three
and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 Compared to Three
and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007
|
FIO reported loss before income taxes of $1.4 billion in
the three months ended September 30, 2008 as compared to
loss before income taxes of $0.7 billion in the
corresponding period in 2007. FIO reported a loss before income
taxes of $5.6 billion in the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 compared to loss before income taxes of
$0.4 billion in the corresponding period in 2007. Refer to
the commentary below for a detailed discussion of the events and
factors contributing to this change.
GMAC reported a net loss of $2.5 billion and
$5.6 billion for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008, respectively, compared to
$1.6 billion in both corresponding periods in 2007. Results
during the three months ended September 30, 2008, were
attributable to a significant loss at ResCap, caused by
continued adverse conditions in the mortgage business, and
increased provision for credit losses related to deterioration
in used vehicle prices and weaker consumer and dealer credit
performance. Results were also adversely affected by realized
losses, and valuation adjustments on assets
held-for-sale
and certain investment securities as a result of illiquidity in
the credit and capital markets.
GMACs Global Automotive Finance operations experienced a
net loss of $294 million and $753 million in the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively,
compared to net income of $554 million and
$1.3 billion in the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2007, respectively. GMACs Global
Automotive Finance operations experienced an increase in credit
reserves as a result of continued deterioration in used vehicle
prices, which affected certain retail balloon contracts and
leases, as well as overall weakness in economic conditions
during 2008. Also, results were effected by an impairment
related to vehicle operating lease residual values, weaker
consumer and dealer credit performance, and valuation losses on
assets
held-for-sale
and certain investment securities due to weaker economic
conditions. Additionally, declines in new vehicle financing
originations due to tighter underwriting standards and lower
industry sales adversely affected results.
86
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
GMACs ResCap operations experienced net losses of
$1.9 billion and $4.6 billion in the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2008, respectively, compared to
net losses of $2.3 billion and $3.4 billion in the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2007,
respectively. The 2008 results were adversely affected by
continued pressure in the domestic housing markets and the
foreign mortgage and capital markets. The adverse conditions
resulted in lower net interest margins, high provisions for loan
losses, lower loan production, realized losses on sales of
mortgage loans, declines in fair value related to mortgage loans
held-for-sale
and trading securities and continued real estate investment
impairments. As market conditions persist, particularly in the
foreign markets, these unfavorable effects on ResCaps
results of operations may continue.
Net income from GMACs Insurance operations was
$97 million and $364 million for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2008, respectively, compared to
$117 million and $391 million in the corresponding
periods in 2007. Net income in the three months ended
September 30, 2008, decreased compared to the corresponding
period in 2007 primarily due to higher realized investment
losses, which were driven by an
other-than-temporary
impairment recognized on certain investment securities, losses
on sales of securities to reduce portfolio exposure to the
financial services sector, and unfavorable investment market
volatility. The decrease was partially offset by a favorable
settlement of a prior year tax return. Net income in the nine
months ended September 30, 2008 decreased compared to the
corresponding period in 2007 primarily due to an increase in
insurance and investment losses, partially offset by a favorable
resolution of a tax audit and the favorable settlement of a
prior year tax liability.
GMACs Other operations experienced a net loss of
$414 million and $574 million in the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2008, respectively, compared to
a net loss of $6 million and net income of $79 million
in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007,
respectively. The decrease for both periods was primarily due to
increased interest expense for corporate activities due to
increased borrowings,
other-than-temporary
impairment recognized on certain investment securities due to
adverse market conditions, decreased equity investment income
and expenses related to the repurchase of equity-based
compensation awards. The three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008, also included intercompany eliminations
of $19 million and $42 million, respectively, related
to the extinguishment of ResCap debt, which are ultimately
eliminated in consolidation. Other operations experienced equity
investment net losses of $13 million and $61 million
in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008,
respectively, compared to net income of $8 million and
$68 million in the corresponding periods in 2007. The
losses were primarily attributable to the decline in credit
market conditions and unfavorable asset revaluations.
FIOs Other Financing reported income before income taxes
of $78 million in the three months ended September 30,
2008 as compared to income before income taxes of
$110 million in the corresponding period in 2007. FIO Other
Financing reported income before income taxes of
$115 million in the nine months ended September 30,
2008 compared to income before income taxes of $395 million
in the corresponding period in 2007. The decrease in income
before income taxes in the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008 relates to the planned liquidation of
our portfolio of equipment on operating leases and a
$105 million impairment charge recorded on these operating
leases in the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
FIOs loss in the three and nine months ending
September 30, 2008 included the impairment charges related
to our investment in GMAC Common and Preferred Membership
Interests discussed above. In the nine months ended
September 30, 2008, we recorded impairment charges of
$2.0 billion related to our investment in GMAC Common
Membership Interests, and in the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008 we recorded impairment charges of
$0.3 billion and $1.0 billion, respectively, related
to our investment in GMAC Preferred Membership Interests.
87
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Corporate
and Other Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2008 vs. 2007 Change
|
|
|
2008 vs. 2007 Change
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Total net sales and revenue
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automotive cost of sales
|
|
|
(727
|
)
|
|
|
315
|
|
|
|
(668
|
)
|
|
|
429
|
|
|
|
(1,042
|
)
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
|
|
(1,097
|
)
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expense
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
301
|
|
|
|
784
|
|
|
|
627
|
|
|
|
(252
|
)
|
|
|
(83.7
|
)%
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
25.0
|
%
|
Other expense
|
|
|
707
|
|
|
|
405
|
|
|
|
4,300
|
|
|
|
1,125
|
|
|
|
302
|
|
|
|
74.6
|
%
|
|
|
3,175
|
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
(1,021
|
)
|
|
|
(4,416
|
)
|
|
|
(2,181
|
)
|
|
|
992
|
|
|
|
97.2
|
%
|
|
|
(2,235
|
)
|
|
|
(102.5
|
)%
|
Automotive interest and other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(102
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(243
|
)
|
|
|
214
|
|
|
|
(90
|
)
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
|
|
(457
|
)
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes, other
equity income and minority interests
|
|
|
(131
|
)
|
|
|
(1,033
|
)
|
|
|
(4,659
|
)
|
|
|
(1,967
|
)
|
|
|
902
|
|
|
|
87.3
|
%
|
|
|
(2,692
|
)
|
|
|
(136.9
|
)%
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
39,113
|
|
|
|
1,758
|
|
|
|
38,682
|
|
|
|
(39,045
|
)
|
|
|
(99.8
|
)%
|
|
|
(36,924
|
)
|
|
|
(95.5
|
)%
|
Equity income, net of tax
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(50.0
|
)%
|
Minority interests, net of tax
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(50.0
|
)%
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(100.0
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(197
|
)
|
|
$
|
(40,144
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,416
|
)
|
|
$
|
(40,646
|
)
|
|
$
|
39,947
|
|
|
|
99.5
|
%
|
|
$
|
34,230
|
|
|
|
84.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n.m. = not meaningful
Corporate and Other includes certain centrally recorded income
and costs, such as interest and income taxes, corporate
expenditures, the elimination of inter-segment transactions and
costs related to pension and OPEB for Delphi retirees and
retirees of other divested businesses for which we have retained
responsibility.
|
|
|
Three
and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 Compared to Three
and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007
|
Automotive cost of sales decreased in the three months ended
September 30, 2008 by $1.0 billion, due to: (1) a
net curtailment gain of $1.2 billion associated with the
finalization of the Settlement Agreement; (2) a
nonrecurring charge of $0.2 billion in the corresponding
period in 2007 for additional pension expense related to the
accelerated recognition of unamortized prior service cost; and
(3) favorable Foreign Currency Translation of
$0.1 billion. The effect of these items was partially
offset by a charge of $0.5 billion associated with the
salaried post-65 healthcare settlement. Automotive cost of sales
decreased in the nine months ended September 30, 2008 by
$1.1 billion. In addition to the above factors, legacy
related costs consisting primarily of pension and OPEB expenses
for GM and Delphi employees and retirees decreased an additional
$0.1 billion.
Selling, general and administrative expense decreased in the
three months ended September 30, 2008 by $0.3 billion
(or 83.7%) due to: (1) recovery of $0.1 billion
related to settlement of legal issues; (2) a charge of
$77 million in the corresponding period in 2007 for
additional pension expense related to the accelerated
recognition of unamortized prior service cost;
(3) resolution of various tax related matters of
$43 million; and (4) a decrease in other
administrative expenses of $24 million. Selling, general
and administrative costs in the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 increased $0.2 billion (or 25.0%)
primarily due to net charges for settlement of legal matters of
$0.2 billion.
Other expense increased in the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008 by $0.3 billion (or 74.6%) and
$3.2 billion, respectively, primarily due to additional
charges recorded for Delphi. In the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008, we recorded charges of
$0.7 billion and $4.1 billion, respectively, related
to the Benefit Guarantee Agreements and $0.1 billion and
$0.2 billion, respectively, related to transactions with
other FIO. In the corresponding periods in 2007, Other expenses
88
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
related primarily to charges of $0.4 billion and
$0.9 billion, respectively, in connection with the Benefit
Guarantee Agreements, and $0.1 billion and
$0.2 billion, respectively, related to transactions with
other FIO.
Automotive interest and other income (expense), net increased in
net expense in the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008 by $0.1 billion and
$0.5 billion, respectively, due to: (1) lower interest
income, driven by lower interest rates and cash balances, of
$0.1 billion and $0.2 billion, respectively;
(2) unfavorable interest of $0.2 billion recognized in
the three months ended June 30, 2007 in connection with
various tax related items; partially offset by (3) a gain
of $50 million from the sale of our common equity interest
in Electro-Motive Diesel, Inc., recorded in the nine months
ended September 30, 2008.
The decrease in Income tax expense (benefit) in the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2008 primarily resulted
from two factors: (1) no longer recognizing the income tax
benefit of losses in the United States, Canada, Germany, Spain
and the United Kingdom due to the effect of full valuation
allowances in these jurisdictions; and (2) the effect of
recording valuation allowances against our net deferred tax
assets in the United States, Canada and Germany in the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2007 and in Spain and the
United Kingdom as it relates to the nine months ended
September 30, 2008.
In the three months ended September 30, 2007, we concluded
that it was more likely than not that we would not generate
sufficient taxable income to realize our net deferred tax assets
in the United States, Canada and Germany, either in whole or in
part, and, accordingly, recorded full valuation allowances of
$39.0 billion against these net deferred tax assets. This
change was primarily due to a decline in actual results from our
previous forecast and a significant downward revision in our
near-term (2008 and 2009) financial outlook.
In addition, in the three months ended March 31, 2008, we
determined that it was more likely than not that we would not
realize our net deferred tax assets, in whole or in part, in
Spain and the United Kingdom and recorded full valuation
allowances of $0.4 billion against our net deferred tax
assets in these tax jurisdictions. The following summarizes the
significant changes occurring in the three months ended
March 31, 2008, which resulted in our decision to record
these full valuation allowances.
In the United Kingdom, we were in a three-year adjusted
cumulative loss position and our near-term and mid-term
financial outlook for automotive market conditions was more
challenging than we believed at December 31, 2007. Our
outlook deteriorated based on our projections of the combined
effects of the challenging foreign exchange environment and
unfavorable commodity prices. Additionally, we increased our
estimate of the potential costs that may arise from the
regulatory and tax environment relating to carbon dioxide
(CO2)
emissions in the European Union, including legislation enacted
or announced during 2008.
In Spain, although we were not currently in a three-year
adjusted cumulative loss position, our near-term and mid-term
financial outlook deteriorated significantly in the three months
ended March 31, 2008 such that we anticipated being in a
three-year adjusted cumulative loss position in the near- and
mid-term. In Spain, as in the United Kingdom, we were
unfavorably affected by the combined effects of the foreign
exchange environment, commodity prices and our estimate of the
potential costs that may arise from the regulatory and tax
environment relating to
CO2
emissions.
Based on our analysis, we concluded that it was more likely than
not that we would not realize our net deferred tax assets, in
whole or in part, in the United Kingdom and Spain and recorded
full valuation allowances. As a result of the full valuation
allowances, we did not record tax benefits for losses incurred
in these tax jurisdictions in the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008.
A description of our method to determine if our deferred tax
assets are realizable is included in Critical Accounting
Estimates Deferred Taxes later in this
MD&A.
89
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Key
Factors Affecting Future and Current Results
|
|
|
2008
GM-UAW Settlement Agreement
|
In February 2008, we entered into the Settlement Agreement with
the UAW and Class Counsel representing the class of GM-UAW
retirees regarding postretirement healthcare coverage. The
Settlement Agreement provides that responsibility for providing
retiree healthcare for GM-UAW retirees, their spouses and
dependents will permanently shift from us to a new retiree plan
(New Plan) funded by a new independent Voluntary Employee
Beneficiary Association trust (New VEBA). On July 31, 2008,
the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
Michigan (Court) approved the Settlement Agreement. The terms of
the Settlement Agreement stipulated that it would not become
effective until all appeals of the July 31, 2008 Court
approval had been exhausted and we had completed discussions
with the staff of the SEC regarding the accounting treatment for
the transactions contemplated in the Settlement Agreement on a
basis we believe to be reasonably satisfactory.
On September 2, 2008, (Final Effective Date), the judgment
became final as the period to file appeals related to the
Courts order expired, with no appeals filed. In September
2008, we determined that discussions between us and the staff of
the SEC regarding the accounting treatment for the transaction
contemplated by the Settlement Agreement were completed on a
basis we believe to be reasonably satisfactory. Therefore, the
Settlement Agreement is now effective and under the terms of the
Settlement Agreement, on January 1, 2010 (Implementation
Date), our obligation to provide retiree healthcare coverage for
GM-UAW retirees and beneficiaries will terminate. The obligation
for all retiree medical claims incurred on or after such date
will be the responsibility of the New Plan and New VEBA. At that
time, we will account for the establishment and funding of the
New VEBA as a termination of our UAW hourly medical plan and
Mitigation Plan in accordance with SFAS No. 106
Employers Accounting for Postretirement Benefits
Other Than Pensions (SFAS No. 106).
As allowed by the Settlement Agreement and consented to by the
Class Counsel, we are deferring $1.7 billion of
payments contractually required under the Settlement Agreement
to the New VEBA including interest on the 6.75% Series U
Convertible Senior Debentures due December 31, 2012
(Convertible Note), annual wage payments, annual base payment
and the Shortfall Payment of $165 million due in 2008 as
described below, which were originally required to be
contributed in 2008 and 2009. These payments are deferred until
the Implementation Date and will be increased by an annual
interest rate factor of 9.0%.
The following table summarizes our contractual contributions to
the New VEBA as required by the Settlement Agreement under the
assumption buyout options are not utilized:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,840
|
|
|
$
|
1,442
|
|
|
$
|
454
|
|
|
$
|
9,540
|
|
|
$
|
13,276
|
|
Cash settlement of Short-Term Note
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,768
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,768
|
|
Cash payment of Convertible Note
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
926
|
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
4,668
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,889
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual contributions (a)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,534
|
|
|
$
|
1,737
|
|
|
$
|
5,122
|
|
|
$
|
9,540
|
|
|
$
|
23,933
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Total contractual contributions exclude any potential shortfall
contributions (Shortfall Payments) as described below, other
than the 2008 required Shortfall Payment, which was deferred
until 2010. This table does not take into consideration the
$450 million payment we committed to pay directly to the
New VEBA to settle a UAW claim asserted against Delphi which is
contingent upon substantial consummation of a Delphi plan of
reorganization (POR). The table also assumes the Convertible
Note is not converted prior to maturity. |
The terms of the Settlement Agreement require us to make
contributions to the New VEBA as described below:
|
|
|
|
|
We may contribute $5.6 billion on the Implementation Date
or we may elect to make annual payments in varying amounts
between $421 million and $3.3 billion through 2020. At
any time after the Implementation Date, we will have the option
to prepay all remaining payments;
|
90
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
|
|
In February 2008 we issued a $4.0 billion short-term note
(Short-Term Note) to LBK, LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company of which we are the sole member (LBK). The Short-Term
Note pays interest at a rate of 9.0% and matures on or before
the 20th business day after the Implementation Date. LBK will
hold the Short-Term Note until maturity at which point the
proceeds will be transferred to the New VEBA;
|
|
|
In February 2008 we issued $4.4 billion principal amount of
our 6.75% Series U Convertible Senior Debentures due
December 31, 2012 to LBK. LBK will hold the Convertible
Note until it is transferred to the New VEBA. The Convertible
Note is convertible into 109 million shares of our common
stock. Interest on the Convertible Note is payable
semi-annually. Interest payments of $296 million due in
2010, 2011 and 2012, after the Convertible Note is contributed
to the New VEBA, will be made directly to the New VEBA (or any
other holder of the Convertible Note);
|
|
|
Existing assets of the Mitigation Plan and a remaining
$1.0 billion contribution due in 2011 to the New VEBA;
|
|
|
Approximately $285 million of other payments to be made on
the Implementation Date; and
|
|
|
We may be required to contribute Shortfall Payments of
$165 million per year, limited to a maximum of 20 payments,
to the New VEBA if annual cash flow projections show that the
New VEBA will become insolvent on a rolling
25-year
basis. As mentioned above, when measuring our obligation at
September 1, 2008, we assumed we would be required to make
all 20 payments.
|
|
|
At any time after the Implementation Date we will have the
option to prepay all remaining payments.
|
The minimum amount of contractual obligations that we are
required to pay under the terms of the Settlement Agreement is
$17.7 billion considering possible buyout options, with the
maximum undiscounted amount of potential payments being
$27.1 billion if all potential Shortfall Payments are made.
Refer to Note 10 to the condensed consolidated financial
statements for more details of the Settlement Agreement and
related accounting and to Note 11 for additional
information regarding Delphi.
|
|
|
2008
Special Attrition Programs and U.S. and Canada Facility
Idlings
|
In February 2008, we entered into agreements with the UAW and
the IUE-CWA regarding special attrition programs which were
intended to further reduce the number of hourly employees. The
2008 UAW Special Attrition Program offered to our 74,000
UAW-represented employees consisted of wage and benefit packages
for normal and voluntary retirements and buyouts for
pre-retirement employees with 26 to 29 years of service. In
addition to their vested pension benefits, those employees that
were retirement eligible will receive a lump sum payment,
depending upon job classification, that will be funded from our
U.S. hourly pension plan. For those employees not retirement
eligible, other buyout options were offered. The terms offered
to the 2,300 IUE-CWA represented employees are similar to those
offered through the 2008 UAW Special Attrition Program. As a
result of the 2008 Special Attrition Programs, we recognized
curtailment losses and other special termination benefits in the
nine months ended September 30, 2008 of $3.2 billion,
which were recorded in Automotive cost of sales. Refer to
Note 10 to the condensed consolidated financial statements
for additional details on the financial statement effects of the
2008 Special Attrition Programs.
Approximately 18,700 employees have elected to participate in
the 2008 Special Attrition Programs, with most employees leaving
active employment on or before July 1, 2008. The expected
cash expenditure for the 2008 Special Attrition Programs are
$0.4 billion of which $0.3 billion was incurred in the
nine months ended September 30, 2008. We expect total cash
expenditures related to the 2008 U.S. and Canada announced
capacity actions to be $1.4 billion, of which we plan to
spend $0.1 billion in 2008, $0.6 billion in 2009, and
$0.7 billion beyond 2009.
In October 2005, Delphi filed a petition for Chapter 11
proceedings under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code for itself and many
of its U.S. subsidiaries. Delphis financial distress and
Chapter 11 filing posed significant risks to us for two
principal reasons: (1) our production operations rely on
systems, components and parts provided by Delphi, our largest
supplier, and could be substantially disrupted if Delphi
rejected its supply agreements or its labor agreements with us
and thereby affected the
91
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
availability or price of the required systems, components or
parts; and (2) in connection with our 1999 spin-off of
Delphi, we provided limited guarantees of pension and OPEB
benefits for hourly employees represented by the UAW, the
IUE-CWA, and the United Steel Workers (USW) who were transferred
to Delphi from GM (Benefit Guarantee Agreements), which could
have been triggered in connection with the Chapter 11
proceedings.
Since the filing, we have continued to work with Delphi, its
unions and other interested parties to negotiate a satisfactory
resolution to Delphis Chapter 11 restructuring
process, including several interim agreements and the labor and
settlement agreements discussed below.
In June 2007, we entered into a Memorandum of Understanding with
Delphi and the UAW (Delphi UAW MOU) which included terms
relating to the consensual triggering of the UAW Benefit
Guarantee Agreement as well as additional terms relating to
Delphis restructuring. Under the Delphi UAW MOU we also
agreed to pay for certain healthcare costs of Delphi retirees
and their beneficiaries in order to provide a level of benefits
consistent with those provided to our retirees and their
beneficiaries from the Mitigation Plan VEBA, which was formed
pursuant to the Delphi UAW MOU. We also committed to pay
$450 million to settle a UAW claim asserted against Delphi,
which the UAW has directed us to pay directly to the Mitigation
Plan or New VEBA, depending upon the timing of the payment. We
also agreed that the applicable Benefit Guarantees will be
triggered for certain UAW employees if Delphi terminates its
pension plan, ceases to provide ongoing credited services, or
fails or refuses to provide postretirement medical benefits for
those UAW employees at any time before Delphis POR or a
similar plan is consummated.
In August 2007, we entered into a Memorandum of Understanding
with Delphi and the IUE-CWA (Delphi IUE-CWA MOU), and we entered
into two separate Memoranda of Understanding with Delphi and the
USW (collectively the USW MOUs). The terms of the Delphi IUE-CWA
MOU and the USW MOUs are similar to the Delphi UAW MOU with
regard to the consensual triggering of the Benefit Guarantee
Agreements.
|
|
|
Delphi-GM
Settlement Agreements
|
In September 2007, as amended in October and December, 2007, we
entered into comprehensive settlement agreements with Delphi
(Delphi-GM Settlement Agreements) consisting of a Global
Settlement Agreement, as amended (GSA) and a Master
Restructuring Agreement, as amended (MRA). The GSA was intended
to resolve outstanding issues between Delphi and us that have
arisen or may arise before Delphis emergence from
Chapter 11. The MRA was intended to govern certain aspects
of our ongoing commercial relationship with Delphi.
On September 12, 2008 we amended the terms of the GSA
(Amended GSA) and MRA (Amended MRA) (collectively, Amended
Delphi-GM Settlement Agreements). On September 26, 2008,
the United States District Court for the Southern District of
New York entered an order approving the implementation of the
Amended Delphi-GM Settlement Agreements which then became
effective on September 20, 2008. In connection with the
Amended GSA, we and Delphi reached agreements with each of
Delphis unions regarding the plan to freeze benefits
related to the Delphi Hourly-Rate Employees Pension Plan (Delphi
HRP), the cessation by Delphi of OPEB for Delphi hourly union
represented employees and retirees, transfers pursuant to
Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Code Section 414(l) of
certain net liabilities from the Delphi HRP to our U.S. hourly
pension plan, and the release by the unions, their members and
their retirees of Delphi and us from claims related to such
matters.
In addition, the more significant items contained in the Amended
Delphi-GM Settlement Agreements include our commitment to:
|
|
|
|
|
Reimburse Delphi for its costs to provide OPEB to certain of
Delphis hourly retirees from December 31, 2006
through the date that Delphi ceases to provide such benefits and
assume responsibility for OPEB going forward;
|
|
|
Reimburse Delphi for the normal cost of credited
service in Delphis pension plan between January 1,
2007 and the date its pension plans are frozen;
|
92
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
|
|
Transfer, under IRS Code Section 414(l), $2.1 billion
of net liabilities from the Delphi HRP to our U.S. hourly
pension plan on September 29, 2008 (First Hourly Pension
Transfer) and remaining net liabilities, which are estimated to
be $1.3 billion at September 30, 2008, upon
Delphis substantial consummation of its POR consistent
with the Amended Delphi-GM Settlement Agreements (Second Hourly
Pension Transfer). Actual amounts of the Second Hourly Pension
Transfer will depend on, among other factors, valuation of
liability at transfer date and performance of pension plan
assets;
|
|
|
Reimburse Delphi for all retirement incentives and half of the
buyout payments made pursuant to the various attrition program
provisions and to reimburse certain U.S. hourly buydown payments
made to certain hourly employees of Delphi;
|
|
|
Award certain future product programs to Delphi, provide Delphi
with ongoing preferential sourcing for other product programs,
eliminate certain previously agreed upon price reductions, and
restrict our ability to re-source certain production to
alternative suppliers;
|
|
|
Reimburse certain U.S. hourly labor costs incurred to produce
systems, components and parts for us from October 1, 2006
through September 14, 2015 at certain U.S. facilities owned
or to be divested by Delphi (Labor Cost Subsidy);
|
|
|
Reimburse Delphis cash flow deficiency attributable to
production at certain U.S. facilities that continue to produce
systems, components and parts for us until the facilities are
either closed or sold by Delphi (Production Cash Burn Support);
|
|
|
Pay Delphi $110 million in both 2009 and 2010 in quarterly
installments in connection with certain U.S. facilities owned by
Delphi (Facilitation Support);
|
|
|
Temporarily accelerate payment terms for Delphis North
American sales to us upon substantial consummation of its POR,
until 2012;
|
|
|
Beginning January 1, 2009, reimburse Delphi for actual cash
payments related to workers compensation, disability,
supplemental employment benefits and severance obligations for
all current and former UAW-represented hourly active and
inactive employees; and
|
|
|
Guarantee a minimum recovery of the net working capital that
Delphi has invested in certain businesses held for sale.
|
Delphi agreed to provide us or our designee with an option to
purchase all or any of certain Delphi businesses for one dollar
if such businesses have not been sold by certain specified
deadlines. If such a business is not sold either to a third
party or to us or any affiliate pursuant to the option by the
applicable deadline, we (or at our option, an affiliate) will be
deemed to have exercised the purchase option, and the unsold
business, including materially all of its assets and
liabilities, will automatically transfer to the GM
buyer. Similarly, under the Delphi UAW MOU if such a
transfer has not occurred by the applicable deadline,
responsibility for the affected UAW hourly employees of such an
unsold business would automatically transfer to us or our
designated affiliate. Upon emergence, Delphi also agreed to
provide us with the right to access and operate four Delphi U.S.
manufacturing facilities under certain circumstances.
The Amended GSA also resolves all claims in existence as of the
effective date of the Amended Delphi-GM Settlement Agreements
(with certain limited exceptions) that either Delphi or we have
or may have against the other, including Delphis motion in
March 2006 under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code to reject certain
supply contracts with us. The Amended GSA and related agreements
with Delphis unions releases us and our related parties,
as defined, from any claims of Delphi and its related parties,
as defined, as well as any employee benefit related claims of
Delphis unions and hourly employees. Also pursuant to the
Amended GSA, we have released Delphi and its related parties, as
defined, from claims by us or our related parties, as defined.
Additionally, the Amended GSA provides that we will receive:
|
|
|
|
|
an administrative claim regarding the First Hourly Pension
Transfer of $1.6 billion, of which we will share equally
with the general unsecured creditors up to only the first
$600 million in recoveries in the event Delphi does not
emerge from bankruptcy;
|
|
|
an administrative claim for $2.1 billion for the total
Delphi HRP transfer (inclusive of the administrative claim for
the First Hourly Pension Transfer) to be paid in preferred stock
upon substantial consummation of Delphis POR in which
Delphi emerges with: (1) its principal core businesses;
(2) exit financing that does not exceed $3.0 billion
(plus a revolving credit facility); and (3) equity
securities that are not senior to or pari passu with the
preferred stock issued to us; and
|
93
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
|
|
a general unsecured claim in the amount of $2.5 billion
that is subordinated until general unsecured creditors receive
recoveries equal to 20% of their general unsecured claims after
which we will receive 20% of our general unsecured claim in
preferred stock, with any further recovery shared ratably
between us and general unsecured creditors.
|
The ultimate value of any consideration that we may receive is
contingent on the fair market value of Delphis assets in
the event Delphi fails to emerge from bankruptcy or upon the
fair market value of Delphis securities if Delphi emerges
from bankruptcy.
The Bankruptcy Court entered an order on January 25, 2008
confirming Delphis POR. On April 4, 2008, Delphi
announced that although it had met the conditions required to
substantially consummate its POR, including obtaining
$6.1 billion in exit financing, Delphis plan
investors refused to participate in the closing of the
transaction contemplated by the POR, which was commenced but not
completed because of the plan investors position. We
continued to work with Delphi and its stakeholders to facilitate
Delphis efforts to emerge from bankruptcy, including the
implementation of the Amended Delphi-GM Settlement Agreements.
On October 3, 2008 Delphi filed a modified POR, which
contemplates Delphi obtaining $3.8 billion in exit
financing to consummate its modified POR. Given the current
credit markets and challenges facing the auto industry, there
can be no assurance that Delphi will be successful in obtaining
$3.8 billion in exit financing to emerge from bankruptcy.
In May 2008, we agreed to advance up to $650 million to
Delphi during 2008, which is within the amounts we would have
owed under the Delphi-GM Settlement Agreements had Delphi
emerged from bankruptcy in April 2008. In August 2008 we entered
into a new agreement to advance up to an additional
$300 million. This increased the amount we could advance to
$950 million in 2008, which is within the amounts we would
owe under the Delphi-GM Settlement Agreements if Delphi was to
emerge from bankruptcy in December 2008. Upon the effectiveness
of the Amended Delphi-GM Settlement Agreements, the original
$650 million advance agreement matured, leaving a
$300 million advance agreement. At September 30, 2008,
no amounts were outstanding under our advance agreement with
Delphi. Further, in October 2008, subject to Delphi obtaining an
extension or other accommodation of its
Debtor-in-Possession
(DIP) financing through June 30, 2009, we agreed to extend
the $300 million advance agreement through June 30,
2009 and to temporarily accelerate our North American payables
to Delphi in the three months ended June 30, 2009, which is
expected to result in additional liquidity to Delphi of
$100 million in each of April, May and June of 2009. The
potential temporary acceleration of payment terms, which was to
occur upon substantial consummation of Delphis POR under
the Amended Delphi-GM Settlement Agreements, is also subject to
Delphis actual liquidity requirement.
We continue to work with Delphi and its stakeholders to
facilitate Delphis efforts to emerge from bankruptcy.
|
|
|
Risks if
Delphi Cannot Emerge From Bankruptcy
|
If Delphi is not successful in emerging from bankruptcy, we
could be subject to some of the risks that we have reported
since Delphis 2005 bankruptcy filing. For example, we may
not be able to obtain the systems, components and parts that
Delphi currently supplies to us. This could materially disrupt
our operations including production of certain of our vehicles.
In addition, although we would still receive an administrative
claim for the First Hourly Pension Transfer, we would not
receive any preferred stock as set forth in the Amended GSA.
In the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 we
recorded charges in Other expenses of $652 million and
$4.1 billion, respectively, and charges in Automotive cost
of sales of $105 million and $444 million,
respectively. In the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2007, we recorded charges in Other expenses
of $350 million and $925 million, respectively. These
charges reflect our best estimate of our obligations associated
with the Benefit Guarantee Agreements and other amounts due
under the Amended Delphi-GM Settlement Agreements. The charge
recorded in the three months ended September 30, 2008
reflects our estimated obligations under the Amended Delphi-GM
Settlement Agreements, net of estimated recoveries, updated to
reflect current uncertainties related to the credit markets and
challenges in the auto industry. Since 2005,
94
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
we have recorded total charges of $11.7 billion in Other
expenses in connection with the Benefit Guarantee Agreements and
Amended Delphi-GM Settlement Agreements, which at
September 30, 2008, reflects an estimate of no recovery for
our unsecured bankruptcy claims. Due to the uncertainties
surrounding Delphis ability to emerge from bankruptcy it
is reasonably possible that additional losses could arise in the
future, but we currently are unable to estimate the amount or
range of such losses, if any.
As previously reported, we are cooperating with federal
governmental agencies in connection with a number of
investigations.
The SEC has issued subpoenas and information requests to us in
connection with various matters including restatements of our
previously issued financial statements in connection with our
accounting for certain foreign exchange contracts and
commodities contracts, our financial reporting concerning
pension and OPEB, certain transactions between us and Delphi,
supplier price reductions or credits and any obligation we may
have to fund pension and OPEB costs in connection with
Delphis proceedings under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code. In addition, the SEC has issued a subpoena in
connection with an investigation of our transactions in precious
metal raw materials used in our automotive manufacturing
operation.
We have produced documents and provided testimony in response to
the subpoenas and will continue to cooperate with respect to
these matters. A negative outcome of one or more of these
investigations could require us to restate prior financial
results, pay fines or penalties or satisfy other remedies under
various provisions of the U.S. securities laws, and any of these
outcomes could under certain circumstances have a material
adverse effect on our business.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Investors or potential investors in our securities consider cash
flows of the Automotive and Other business, which consists of
our four regional Automotive segments and Corporate and Other,
and FIO business to be relevant measures in the analysis of our
various securities that trade in public markets. Accordingly, we
provide supplemental statements of cash flows to aid users of
our condensed consolidated financial statements in the analysis
of liquidity and capital resources.
95
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
This information reconciles to the condensed consolidated
statements of cash flows after the elimination of Net
investing activity with Financing and Insurance Operations
and Net financing activity with Automotive and Other
Operations line items shown in the table below. Following
are such statements for the nine months ended September 30,
2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automotive and Other
|
|
|
Financing and Insurance
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) continuing operating
activities
|
|
$
|
(10,487
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,042
|
|
|
$
|
826
|
|
|
$
|
1,599
|
|
Cash provided by discontinued operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
221
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
(10,487
|
)
|
|
|
2,263
|
|
|
|
826
|
|
|
|
1,599
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenditures for property
|
|
|
(5,527
|
)
|
|
|
(4,937
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Investments in marketable securities, acquisitions
|
|
|
(3,146
|
)
|
|
|
(8,615
|
)
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
Investments in marketable securities, liquidations
|
|
|
5,124
|
|
|
|
6,764
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
Proceeds from sale of business units/equity investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,354
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital contribution to GMAC LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,022
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating leases, liquidations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,014
|
|
|
|
2,463
|
|
Net investing activity with Financing and Insurance Operations
|
|
|
1,198
|
|
|
|
721
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(324
|
)
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
|
|
352
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) continuing investing
activities
|
|
|
(2,675
|
)
|
|
|
(1,806
|
)
|
|
|
3,318
|
|
|
|
2,489
|
|
Cash used in discontinued investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(2,675
|
)
|
|
|
(1,828
|
)
|
|
|
3,318
|
|
|
|
2,489
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in short-term borrowing
|
|
|
257
|
|
|
|
(305
|
)
|
|
|
(2,987
|
)
|
|
|
(3,427
|
)
|
Borrowings of long-term debt
|
|
|
5,581
|
|
|
|
1,919
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments made on long-term debt
|
|
|
(847
|
)
|
|
|
(1,244
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net financing activity with Automotive and Other Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,198
|
)
|
|
|
(721
|
)
|
Cash dividends paid to stockholders
|
|
|
(283
|
)
|
|
|
(425
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) continuing financing
activities
|
|
|
4,708
|
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
(4,185
|
)
|
|
|
(4,148
|
)
|
Cash used in discontinued financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
4,708
|
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
|
|
(4,185
|
)
|
|
|
(4,148
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(315
|
)
|
|
|
292
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net transactions with Automotive/Financing Operations
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(8,718
|
)
|
|
|
628
|
|
|
|
(92
|
)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period
|
|
|
24,549
|
|
|
|
23,774
|
|
|
|
268
|
|
|
|
349
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period
|
|
$
|
15,831
|
|
|
$
|
24,402
|
|
|
$
|
176
|
|
|
$
|
328
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have had significant losses from 2005 through the nine months
ended September 30, 2008, attributable to operations and to
restructurings and other charges such as support for Delphi and
future cost cutting measures. We have managed our liquidity
during this time through a series of cost reduction initiatives,
capital markets transactions and sales of assets. However, the
global credit market crisis has had a dramatic effect on our
industry. In the three months ended September 30, 2008, the
turmoil in the mortgage and overall credit markets, continued
reductions in U.S. housing values, historically high prices
for energy, the high likelihood that the United States and
Western Europe have entered into a recession and the slowdown of
economic growth in the rest of the world, created a
substantially more difficult business environment. Vehicle sales
in North America and Western Europe contracted severely and the
pace of vehicle sales in the rest of the world slowed. Our
liquidity position, as well as our operating performance, were
negatively affected by these economic and industry conditions
and by other financial and business factors, many of which are
beyond our control. These conditions have generally worsened
during October 2008, with sales of vehicles for the
U.S. industry falling to 861,000 units, or a
seasonally adjusted rate of 10.9 million units, which was
the
96
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
lowest level for October since 1982. We do not believe it is
likely that these adverse economic conditions, and their effect
on the automotive industry, will improve significantly in the
near term, notwithstanding the unprecedented intervention by the
U.S. and other governments in the global banking and
financial systems.
In the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we used
$9.7 billion of cash in operations and our liquidity
position deteriorated by $11.1 billion. Our cash flow
deteriorated primarily due to our significant operating loss,
increases in inventory balances of $2.0 billion and a
decrease in accounts payable and accruals of $2.5 billion.
We have taken far reaching actions to restructure our
U.S. business, but the effects of current global economic
and credit market conditions on the automotive industry require
that we obtain additional near-term liquidity support. Based on
our estimated cash requirements through December 31, 2009,
we do not expect our current operations to generate sufficient
cash flow to fund our obligations as they come due, and we do
not currently have other traditional sources of liquidity
available to fund these obligations.
On July 15, 2008, we announced a plan for a combination of
operating and related initiatives, as well as asset sales and
capital market activities, both to conserve cash and to generate
incremental cash flows in a total amount of up to
$15 billion. Reflecting the priority of addressing
liquidity in the current financial environment, we announced
additional operating changes on November 7, 2008. We expect
these additional actions to provide an incremental
$5 billion of cash savings through December 31, 2009,
which combined with the previous initiatives announced on
July 15, 2008 would conserve or generate cash of up to
$20 billion. These various initiatives are described below,
and many of them, particularly asset sales and capital market
activities, will be very challenging given the current business
and credit market environments. Moreover, the full impact of
many of these actions will not be realized until the second half
of 2009 or later, even if they are implemented successfully.
We are confident in our ability to execute those operating
actions that are substantially within our control, including
reductions in spending and working capital improvements. The
success of our plans, however, necessarily depends on global
economic conditions and the level of automotive sales,
particularly in the United States and Western Europe. Our plans
also assume that we will not be required to provide additional
financial support to Delphi or GMAC beyond the level previously
agreed to, that our trade suppliers will continue to conduct
business with us on terms consistent with historical practice
and that no other material adverse developments occur. In
addition, our liquidity plans are subject to a number of other
risks and uncertainties, including those described below under
the heading Risk Factors, some of which are outside
our control.
Based on our most recently available information (updated after
the Form 8-K filed on November 7, 2008), even if we implement
the planned operating actions that are substantially within our
control, our estimated liquidity during the remainder of 2008
will be at or near the minimum amount necessary to operate our
business. Looking into the first two quarters of 2009, even with
our planned actions, our estimated liquidity will fall
significantly short of the minimum amount necessary to operate
our business unless economic and automotive industry conditions
significantly improve, we receive substantial proceeds from
asset sales, we take more aggressive working capital
initiatives, we gain access to capital markets and other private
sources of funding, we receive government funding under one or
more current or future programs, or some combination of the
foregoing occur. We are actively pursuing all of these possible
sources of funding, but there can be no assurance that they will
supply funds in amounts and timing sufficient to meet our
liquidity requirements through the first two quarters of 2009
and perhaps in later periods.
Our financial statements have been prepared on a going concern
basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the
satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business.
Our ability to continue as a going concern is substantially
dependent on the successful execution of many of the actions
referred to above, on the timeline contemplated by our plans.
Our interim condensed financial statements do not include any
adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of
recorded asset amounts nor to the amounts and classification of
liabilities that may be necessary should we be unable to
continue as a going concern.
97
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
Previous
Restructuring Actions
|
From 2005 through 2007, we took a number of steps to restructure
our North American operations for sustainable profitability.
These included reducing structural costs by $9 billion per
year, with plans to eliminate additional annual structural costs
by 2011. In addition, we reached a historic agreement with the
UAW in 2007 that provided the basis for a fully competitive
manufacturing base in the United States by 2010. The UAW
agreement also provided for the funding of retiree health care
obligations by an independent VEBA trust, commencing in 2010. We
also modified our salaried employee and executive pension plans
and health care coverage to reduce our unfunded liability and
made significant reductions in North American manufacturing
capacity and headcount.
Our North American restructuring also emphasized a commitment to
product excellence as evidenced by award-winning new product
launches such as the Chevrolet Malibu, the Cadillac CTS and the
Buick Enclave. In addition, we established a leadership position
in advanced propulsion technologies, including fuel efficiency,
biofuels, hybrids, electric vehicles and hydrogen fuel cells.
During the period from 2005 to 2007, the U.S. total vehicle
market ranged from 16.5 million to 17.5 million units
per year, and as recently as May 2008, our operating plans were
based on a market assumption of more than 15.5 million
units in 2008 in the United States, which was in line with
industry analysts consensus at that time. As global
economic conditions deteriorated during 2008, we revised the
assumptions underlying our operating plans and recognized that
additional actions would be needed to position our operations
for the continuing decline in new vehicle sales. As explained
below, a decline in vehicle sales and production results in
outflows of cash greater than collections of accounts
receivables, which has a negative impact on our working capital.
This working capital impact has the effect of reducing our
operating cash flow at a higher rate than the decline in vehicle
unit volume.
On July 15, 2008, we announced new planning assumptions
based on a U.S. total vehicle market of 14.3 million
units in 2008 and 2009, which was at or below industry
analysts consensus, and a U.S. market share of 21% in
those years. Accordingly, we undertook a number of initiatives
aimed at conserving or generating approximately
$15.0 billion of cash on an incremental basis through the
end of 2009. These initiatives included approximately
$10 billion of operating actions that are substantially
within our control, including structural cost reductions,
reducing capital spending, improving working capital, reaching
agreement to defer approximately $1.7 billion of scheduled
payments to the UAW VEBA, and eliminating the dividend paid on
our common stock. Further information about these actions
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Salaried employment savings (estimated $1.5 billion
effect) We are executing salaried headcount
reductions in the U.S. and Canada through normal attrition,
early retirements, mutual separation programs and other tools.
In September 2008, we extended voluntary early retirement offers
under our Salaried Retirement Window Program (Salaried Window
Program) to certain of our U.S. salaried employees.
Employees accepting the Salaried Retirement Window Program were
required to do so no later than October 24, 2008, with the
majority of retirements taking place on November 1, 2008.
As of October 31, 2008, 3,460 employees had
irrevocably accepted the Salaried Retirement Window Program,
which was in excess of the 3,000 needed to achieve our financial
target. In addition, health care coverage for U.S. salaried
retirees over 65 has been eliminated, effective January 1,
2009. Furthermore, there will be no new base compensation
increases for U.S. and Canadian salaried employees for the
remainder of 2008 and 2009. We are also eliminating
discretionary cash bonuses for the executive group in 2008.
|
|
|
GMNA structural cost reductions (estimated $2.5 billion
effect) Significant progress has been made towards
achieving GMNAs structural cost reduction target. We have
accelerated cessation of production at two assembly facilities
in addition to shift and line-rate reductions at other
facilities. Truck capacity is expected to be reduced by 300,000
vehicles by the end of 2009. Promotional and advertising
spending is being reduced by 25% and 20%, respectively, and
engineering spending is being curtailed as well. In addition, we
are implementing significant reductions in discretionary
spending (e.g., travel, non-core information technology projects
and consulting services).
|
|
|
Capital expenditure reductions (estimated $1.5 billion
effect) The major components of this reduction are
related to a delay in the next generation large
pick-up
truck and sport utility vehicle programs, as well as V-8 engine
development.
|
98
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
|
|
There will also be reductions in non-product capital spending.
These reductions will be partially offset by increases in
powertrain spending related to alternative propulsion, small
displacement engines and fuel economy technologies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working capital improvements (estimated $2.0 billion
effect) Actions are being taken to improve working
capital by approximately $1.5 billion in North America and
$0.5 billion in Europe by December 31, 2009, primarily
by reducing raw material,
work-in-progress
and finished goods inventory levels as well as implementing lean
inventory practices at parts warehouses. All these initiatives
are on track for completion prior to December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
UAW VEBA payment deferrals (estimated $1.7 billion
effect) Approximately $1.7 billion of payments
that had been scheduled to be made to a temporary asset account
in 2008 and 2009 for the establishment of the New VEBA has been
deferred until 2010. The outstanding payable resulting from this
deferral will accrue interest at 9% per annum. The UAW and
Class Counsel have agreed that this deferral will not
constitute a change in or breach of the Settlement Agreement.
Within 20 business days of the Implementation Date,
approximately $7.0 billion of deferred payments, plus
interest plus additional contractual amounts will be due to the
New VEBA.
|
|
|
Dividend suspension (estimated $0.8 billion
effect) Our Board of Directors has suspended
dividends on our common stock.
|
The remaining $5 billion of our July liquidity plan
included $2 billion to $4 billion of planned asset
sales and $2 billion to $3 billion of fundraising in
capital markets. We believed that these actions, together with
the availability of $4.5 billion under our secured credit
line, would provide sufficient liquidity for the balance of 2008
and 2009 as well. The status of these previously-announced
activities as of November 7, 2008, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Asset sales We are exploring the sale of the HUMMER
business, the Strasbourg transmission plant and the AC Delco
business. We expect to shortly commence providing offering
materials to potential buyers for the HUMMER and AC Delco
aftermarket parts businesses pursuant to appropriate
confidentiality agreements and have already commenced providing
confidential offering materials for the Strasbourg transmission
plant to interested parties. We are also in the process of
monetizing idle or excess real estate, and several individual
transactions are in various stages of execution.
|
|
|
Capital market activities Our plan targeted at least
$2.0 billion to $3.0 billion of financing during 2008
and 2009. However, due to the prevailing global economic
conditions and our current financial condition and near-term
outlook, we currently do not have access to the capital markets
on acceptable terms. In the three months ended
September 30, 2008, we executed $0.5 billion of
debt-for-equity exchanges of our Series D convertible bonds
due in June 2009. In addition, we have gross unencumbered assets
of over $20 billion, which could support a secured debt
offering, or multiple offerings, in excess of the initially
targeted $2.0 billion to $3.0 billion, if market
conditions recover. These assets include stock of foreign
subsidiaries, brands, our investment in GMAC and real estate.
|
|
|
|
Recent
Developments and November 2008 Initiatives
|
Since July, U.S. auto industry sales have continued to
erode, with light vehicle sales declining to a seasonally
adjusted annual rate of 10.9 million units in October 2008.
In addition to the general economic factors discussed above,
conditions in the credit markets caused GMAC, like many other
lenders, to suspend or severely curtail lease financing and
tighten credit standards for traditional retail financing, with
the result that consumers find it more difficult to finance
purchases of new vehicles. GMAC and other lenders also
increasingly restricted dealer financing. In light of the
continued deterioration of industry vehicle sales and generally
worsening economic conditions, we are now basing our operating
plans on what we believe to be a conservative assumption of a
14.0 million unit U.S. total vehicle market in 2008
and 12.0 million for 2009, and we have concluded that our
July 2008 initiatives will not be sufficient to ensure adequate
liquidity through 2009 without further actions being taken.
As noted above, one consequence of the global economic downturn
and credit crisis has been that capital markets have for all
practical purposes been closed to GM for purposes of
implementing the $2 billion to $3 billion of
fundraising that was included in our July plan to bolster our
liquidity during the remainder of 2008 and the first half of
2009. We explored a number of potential transactions to issue
significant debt or equity capital during the three months ended
September 30, 2008, but were unable to do so on acceptable
terms. In the three months ended September 30, 2008, we
exchanged $0.5 billion of principal amount of our
outstanding Series D convertible bonds due in June 2009 for
newly issued GM common stock. As it is unlikely we will be able
to execute an additional capital markets transaction in the near
term, our ability to meet our liquidity needs relies on
99
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
our ability to successfully implement other initiatives in our
liquidity plans. The global credit market further deteriorated
in September with the failures of several large financial
institutions and the merger of others. Accordingly, on
September 24, 2008, in order to have certainty of access to
funding, we drew down the remaining $3.4 billion of funding
available under our secured revolving credit facility. We had
previously drawn $1.0 billion on August 1, 2008 to
assist in meeting our seasonal working capital needs.
Reflecting the priority of addressing liquidity, we announced
additional operating changes and other actions on
November 7, 2008. Taken together, we expect these actions
to provide an incremental $5 billion of cash savings
through December 31, 2009, which combined with previous
initiatives announced on July 15, 2008, would conserve or
generate cash of up to $20 billion. These additional
actions include:
|
|
|
|
|
Salaried employment savings (estimated $0.5 billion effect)
Additional salaried employment savings will be
achieved through incremental workforce reductions in
U.S. and Canada, including involuntary separation
initiatives. In addition, we have announced the suspension of
our matching contribution to certain defined contribution plans
starting November 1, 2008 as well as suspension of other
reimbursement programs for U.S. and Canadian salaried
employees. We also expect to realize salaried employment savings
in Western Europe in 2009 through a wage/salary freeze and other
cost reduction initiatives.
|
|
|
Additional GMNA structural cost reductions (estimated
$1.5 billion effect) We expect to reduce GMNA
structural cost by an additional $1.5 billion in 2009.
These additional reductions would result from the recently
announced acceleration of previously planned capacity actions
and other plant operating plan changes, additional efficiencies
in engineering resources aligned with further product plan
changes, continued marketing spending reductions aligned with
expected automotive industry conditions and intensified focus on
discretionary spending reductions.
|
|
|
Additional working capital reductions (estimated
$0.5 billion effect) GMNA is targeting
approximately $0.5 billion of additional working capital
reductions beyond the original 2008 target reduction level of
$1.5 billion. This additional target reduction is expected
to be achieved by continuing to focus on inventory reductions
and initiatives related to accounts payables.
|
|
|
Additional capital expenditure reductions (estimated
$2.5 billion effect) 2009 capital spending will
be reduced from the revised target of $7.2 billion
announced on July 15 to $4.8 billion. This reduction will
be achieved primarily through deferrals of selected programs
(e.g., the Cadillac CTS coupe and the next generation Chevy Aveo
for the global market) and related capacity reduction projects.
However, we are still planning to increase global spending for
fuel economy improvements, and spending related to the Chevy
Volt will continue. Beyond 2009, capital expenditures will
stabilize in the $6.5 billion to $7.0 billion range
(excluding China, which is self funded with our joint venture
partner).
|
The actions announced in July and November are intended to
conserve or generate cash of up to $20 billion in response
to deterioration in the global economy, particularly the
automotive industry, so that we can preserve adequate liquidity
throughout the period from September 30, 2008 to
December 31, 2009. However, the full effect of many of
these actions will not be realized until later in 2009, even if
they are successfully implemented. We are committed to exploring
all of the initiatives discussed above because there is no
assurance that industry or capital markets conditions will
improve within that time frame. Our ability to continue as a
going concern is highly dependent on the successful execution of
many of the actions referred to above, on the timeline
contemplated by our plans.
Based on our most recently available information (updated after
the Form 8-K filed on November 7, 2008), even if we implement
the planned operating actions that are substantially within our
control, our estimated liquidity during the remainder of 2008
will be at or near the minimum amount necessary to operate our
business. Looking into the first two quarters of 2009, even with
our planned actions, our estimated liquidity will fall
significantly short of the minimum amount necessary to operate
our business unless economic and automotive industry conditions
significantly improve, we receive substantial proceeds from
asset sales, we take more aggressive working capital
initiatives, we gain access to capital markets and other private
sources of funding, we receive government funding under one or
more current or future programs, or some combination of the
foregoing occur. The success of our plans necessarily depends on
global economic conditions and the level of automotive sales,
particularly in the United States and Western Europe. Our plans
also assume that we will not be required to provide additional
100
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
financial support to Delphi or GMAC beyond the level previously
agreed to and that our trade suppliers will continue to conduct
business with us on terms consistent with historical practice.
Our suppliers could respond to an apparent weakening of our
liquidity position by requesting quicker payment of invoices or
other assurances. If this were to happen, our need for cash
would be intensified and we may be unable to make payments to
our suppliers as they become due.
In connection with their year-end audit of our annual financial
statements, our independent auditors assess whether a statement
should be included in their audit report related to the
existence of substantial doubt related to our ability to
continue as a going concern. If the report on our audited
financial statements included such a statement, we would not be
in compliance with the covenants in certain significant credit
agreements, including our $4.5 billion secured revolving
credit facility and $1.5 billion U.S. term loan, both
of which would be callable by the lenders. Additionally, we have
other significant obligations that include cross-default
provisions that could be triggered by a failure to comply with
those credit agreements. We would need to seek a waiver from the
lenders for any covenant breaches or cross defaults, or arrange
for substitute financing. There is no assurance that we could
cure a default, secure a waiver or arrange substitute financing
in such circumstances or that we would not incur significant
costs in doing so.
On November 5, 2008 the DOE issued regulations under the
EISA, which permit the DOE to lend up to $25 billion on
favorable terms to automobile manufacturers and suppliers. We
have analyzed the regulations on a preliminary basis, and we
believe that a significant number of our projects through
2014 may qualify for funding under this program. The DOE
will determine which projects qualify for support under the
EISA, and once approved, the timing of disbursements of loan
funding for these projects will depend upon the timing of the
spending on those projects. GM intends to submit its first loan
request before the end of 2008. The amount and timing of any
loan will be subject to the DOE review and approval process, but
we believe that it is likely that we will begin receiving
project funds during 2009.
We have engaged in discussions with various U.S. federal
government agencies and Congressional leaders about the large
and important role that the domestic automotive industry plays
in the U.S. economy and the need for immediate government
funding support given the economic and credit crisis and its
impact on the industry, including consumers, dealers, suppliers
and manufacturers. Many in the government have acknowledged the
important role of the industry in the national economy and our
discussions are ongoing; at this point, their outcome can not be
predicted with certainty.
In addition, we have recently explored the possibility of a
strategic acquisition that we believed would generate
significant cost reduction synergies and substantially
strengthen our financial position in the medium and long term,
while being neutral or modestly positive to cash flow even in
the near term. While the acquisition could potentially have
provided significant benefits, we have concluded that it is more
important at the present time to focus on our immediate
liquidity challenges and, accordingly, we have set aside
consideration of such a transaction as a near-term priority. We
frequently discuss matters of mutual interest with other auto
manufacturers and, as a matter of policy, we generally do not
comment on these private discussions, which in many cases do not
lead anywhere.
Our liquidity plans are subject to a number of risks and
uncertainties, including those described below under the caption
Risk Factors, some of which are outside our control.
If we are unable to make payments as they come due we could
default on our indebtedness, which would force us to seek
waivers of any covenant breaches on our indebtedness or
obligations or arrange for substitute financing. There is no
assurance that we could secure a waiver in such circumstances or
that we would not incur significant costs in doing so.
Additionally, we have significant obligations that include
cross-default provisions that could be triggered by a failure to
comply with certain significant credit agreements. We would need
to seek a waiver from the lenders for any covenant breaches or
cross defaults, or arrange for substitute financing. There is no
assurance that we could cure a default, secure a waiver or
arrange substitute financing in such circumstances or that we
would not incur significant costs in doing so. The success of
our plans necessarily depends on global economic conditions and
the level of automotive sales, particularly in the United States
and Western Europe. In addition, our liquidity plan is based on
assumptions that we are not required to provide additional
financial support to Delphi or GMAC beyond the level previously
agreed to, that our trade suppliers continue to conduct business
with us consistent with historical practice and that no other
material adverse developments occur.
101
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Automotive and Other (Automotive) available liquidity includes
cash balances, marketable securities, and readily available
assets of our VEBA trusts. At September 30, 2008, available
liquidity was $16.2 billion compared with
$21.0 billion at June 30, 2008, $27.3 billion at
December 31, 2007 and $30.0 billion at
September 30, 2007. The amount of consolidated cash and
marketable securities is subject to intra-month and seasonal
fluctuations and includes balances held by various business
units and subsidiaries worldwide that are needed to fund their
operations.
Although our cost reduction initiatives have reduced our ongoing
need for cash compared to prior periods, we still expect to have
substantial cash requirements going forward. Our future uses of
cash will include, among other possible demands:
|
|
|
|
|
Costs to implement long-term cost savings and restructuring
plans such as potential capacity reduction programs;
|
|
|
Continuing capital expenditures;
|
|
|
Scheduled U.S. term debt and lease maturities through 2009
of $2.3 billion;
|
|
|
Scheduled cash contributions of $7.2 billion in early 2010
for the benefit of the New VEBA trust for postretirement health
care established pursuant to the Settlement Agreement; and
|
|
|
Continuing use of cash in our operations as a result of lower
global industry sales.
|
As discussed above, we are experiencing a decline in vehicle
sales in the North American and Western European markets that
results in an unfavorable effect on working capital. In the
United States, we generally recognize revenue and collect the
associated receivable shortly after production, but pay our
suppliers approximately 47 days later. Accordingly, we
consistently have negative working capital. During periods of
declining sales and production this results in outflows of cash
greater than collections of accounts receivable, as we pay
suppliers for materials on which we have previously recognized
revenue and collected the associated receivable. When production
and sales stabilize, this effect reverses and we return to a
more regular pattern of working capital changes. If the volume
of our sales declines further, there will continue to be an
associated negative operating cash flow effect due to working
capital changes, and it could be significant. However, if the
downward trend of sales were to reverse, we would experience
positive operating cash flow effects attributable to a reduction
in working capital.
We manage our global liquidity centrally, which allows us to
optimize funding of our global operations. At September 30,
2008, approximately 45% of our available liquidity was held in
the U.S. In the nine months ended September 30, 2008,
our U.S. liquidity position deteriorated mainly due to
negative operating cash flow, payments to Delphi in connection
to the Global Settlement Agreement and the Master Restructuring
Agreement, and restructuring charges, partially offset by
borrowings on our secured U.S. credit facility. This
deterioration was particularly pronounced in the three months
ended September 30, 2008, due to unusually high sales
allowance reserves in North America related to our switch to
emphasizing cash rather than financing incentives for vehicle
sales. However, our U.S. operations have access to much of
our overseas liquidity through inter-company arrangements. The
following table summarizes our global liquidity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in billions)
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
15.8
|
|
|
$
|
24.6
|
|
|
$
|
24.4
|
|
Marketable securities
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
Readily-available VEBA assets
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available liquidity
|
|
|
16.2
|
|
|
|
27.3
|
|
|
|
30.0
|
|
Available under credit facilities
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
9.7
|
|
|
|
9.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liquidity
|
|
$
|
18.4
|
|
|
$
|
37.0
|
|
|
$
|
39.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
The following table summarizes our VEBA assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in billions)
|
|
|
Total VEBA assets
|
|
$
|
13.2
|
|
|
$
|
16.3
|
|
|
$
|
19.1
|
|
Readily-available VEBA assets
|
|
$
|
0.3
|
|
|
$
|
0.6
|
|
|
$
|
3.6
|
|
The decrease in the total VEBA assets since December 31,
2007 was due to negative asset returns during the period and a
$0.2 billion withdrawal of VEBA assets in the nine months
ended September 30, 2008. In connection with the Settlement
Agreement a significant portion of the VEBA assets have been
allocated to the UAW Related Account, which will also hold the
proportional investment returns on that percentage of the trust.
No amounts will be withdrawn from the UAW Related Account
including its investment returns from January 1, 2008 until
transfer to the New VEBA. Because of this treatment, we are
excluding any portion of the UAW Related Account from our
available liquidity at and subsequent to December 31, 2007.
At the Implementation Date, we will be required to transfer
$7.2 billion, including the deferred amounts discussed
below, subject to adjustment, to the New VEBA. Further, we may
either transfer an additional $5.6 billion, subject to
adjustment, to the New VEBA at that time, or we may instead opt
to make annual payments of varying amounts between
$421 million and $3.3 billion through 2020. At any
time after the Implementation Date we will have the option to
prepay all remaining payments.
At September 30, 2008, we had $2.2 billion of unused
credit capacity, of which $0.4 billion was available in the
U.S., $0.4 billion was available in other countries where
we do business and $1.4 billion was available in our joint
ventures. The components of our available credit and unused
credit capacity are discussed in the following paragraphs.
We have a $4.5 billion standby revolving credit facility
with a syndicate of banks, which terminates in July 2011. At
September 30, 2008, $4.4 billion was outstanding under
the credit revolver. In addition to the outstanding amount at
September 30, 2008, there were $13 million of letters
of credit issued under the credit facility. Under the
$4.5 billion secured facility, borrowings are limited to an
amount based on the value of the underlying collateral. In
addition to the $4.5 billion secured line of credit, the
collateral also secures certain lines of credit, automatic
clearinghouse and overdraft arrangements, and letters of credit
provided by the same secured lenders, of $1.6 billion. In
the event of work stoppages that result in the loss of a certain
level of production, the secured facility would be temporarily
reduced to $3.5 billion. At September 30, 2008, we had
no further availability under this facility.
In August 2007, we entered into a revolving credit agreement
expiring in August 2009 that provides for borrowings of up to
$0.9 billion at September 30, 2008. This agreement
provides additional available liquidity that we could use for
general corporate purposes, including working capital needs.
Under the facility, borrowings are limited to an amount based on
the value of underlying collateral. The underlying collateral
supported a borrowing base of $0.6 billion,
$1.3 billion, and $1.2 billion at September 30,
2008, December 31, 2007 and September 30, 2007,
respectively. At September 30, 2008, $0.5 billion was
outstanding under this agreement, leaving $27 million
available.
On September 23, 2008, we entered into a one-year revolving
on-balance sheet securitization borrowing program that provides
financing of up to $0.2 billion. The program replaced an
off-balance sheet trade receivable securitization facility that
expired on September 17, 2008. This new facility is in
addition to an existing on-balance sheet securitization
borrowing program that provides financing of up to
$0.5 billion. As a part of these programs certain trade
accounts receivables related to vehicle sales are isolated in
wholly-owned bankruptcy remote special purpose entities, which
in turn pledge the receivables to the lending institutions. The
receivables pledged are not reported separately from other trade
accounts receivables on the condensed consolidated balance
sheet. At September 30, 2008, the amount of receivables
pledged and borrowed under these programs was $1.0 billion
and $0.4 billion, respectively. The pledged receivables are
reported in Accounts and notes receivable, net and borrowings
are reported as Short-term borrowings.
103
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
In addition, our consolidated affiliates with non-GM minority
shareholders, primarily GM Daewoo, have a combined
$1.4 billion in undrawn committed facilities.
We have recorded significant non-cash charges (gains) related to
impairments in our investments in GMAC Common and Preferred
Membership interests, our FIO segments portfolio of
equipment on operating leases, recording valuation allowances
against our deferred tax assets, and the remeasurement of our
pension and OPEB plans. The following table summarizes our more
significant non-cash charges (gains):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Impairment of GMAC Common Membership Interest
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,036
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Impairment of GMAC Preferred Membership Interest
|
|
|
251
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,001
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of FIO Equipment on operating leases, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of long-lived assets
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
Net curtailment gain related to finalization of Settlement
Agreement
|
|
|
(3,684
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,684
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Salaried post-65 healthcare settlement
|
|
|
1,172
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,172
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in amortization period for pension prior service costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,310
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,310
|
|
Valuation allowances against deferred tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,032
|
|
|
|
379
|
|
|
|
39,032
|
|
Others
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(2,260
|
)
|
|
$
|
40,342
|
|
|
$
|
1,038
|
|
|
$
|
40,379
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease in available liquidity to $16.2 billion at
September 30, 2008 from $27.3 billion at
December 31, 2007 was primarily a result of negative
operating cash flow driven by reduced production in North
America and Western Europe, higher levels of capital
expenditures, and payments to Delphi in connection with the GSA
and the MRA.
Investments in marketable securities primarily consist of
purchases, sales, and maturities of highly-liquid corporate,
U.S. government, U.S. government agency and mortgage-backed debt
securities used for cash management purposes. In the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 we liquidated net
$2.0 billion of marketable securities.
In the nine months ended September 30, 2008, Automotive and
Other had negative cash flow from continuing operations of
$10.5 billion on a net loss from continuing operations of
$16.4 billion. That result compares with positive cash flow
from continuing operations of $2.0 billion and net loss
from continuing operations of $41.3 billion in the
corresponding period of 2007. Operating cash flow in the nine
months ended September 30, 2008 was unfavorably affected
primarily by lower volumes and the resulting loss in North
America and Western Europe.
Capital expenditures of $5.5 billion and $4.9 billion
were a significant use of investing cash in the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Capital
expenditures were primarily made for global product programs,
powertrain and tooling requirements.
Total debt, including capital leases, industrial revenue bond
obligations and borrowings from GMAC at September 30, 2008
was $43.3 billion, of which $7.2 billion was
classified as short-term or current portion of long-term debt
and $36.1 billion was classified as long-term. At
December 31, 2007, total debt was $39.4 billion of
which $6.0 billion was short-term or current portion of
long-term debt and $33.4 billion was long-term. This
increase in total debt was primarily a result of new debt,
104
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
including a secured revolving credit facility and other secured
borrowings, partially offset by the retirement of term debt,
convertible debt and capital leases.
At September 30, 2008 short-term borrowing and current
portion of long-term debt of $7.2 billion includes
$1.3 billion of debt issued by our subsidiaries and
consolidated affiliates and $2.6 billion of related party
debt, mainly dealer wholesale floor plan financing from GMAC. We
have various debt maturities other than current of
$0.6 billion in 2009, $0.4 billion in 2010,
$6.2 billion in 2011 and various debt maturities of
$28.9 billion thereafter.
In September 2008, we entered into agreements with a qualified
institutional holder of our 1.50% Series D convertible
senior debentures due in 2009 (Series D debentures).
Pursuant to these agreements, we issued an aggregate of
44 million shares of our common stock in exchange for
$0.5 billion principal amount of our Series D
debentures. We entered into the agreements, in part, to reduce
our debt and interest costs, increase our equity, and thereby,
improve our liquidity. We did not receive any cash proceeds from
the exchange of our common stock for the Series D
debentures, which have been retired and cancelled. As a result
of this exchange, we recorded a settlement gain of
$19 million in the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008.
Net debt, calculated as cash, marketable securities and
$0.3 billion of readily-available VEBA assets,
($0.6 billion at December 31, 2007), less the
short-term borrowings and long-term debt, was $27.1 billion
at September 30, 2008, compared with $12.1 billion at
December 31, 2007.
We believe that it is possible that issues may arise under
various other financing arrangements from our 2006 restatement
of prior consolidated financial statements. These financing
arrangements consist principally of obligations in connection
with sale/leaseback transactions, derivative contracts, and
other lease obligations, including off-balance sheet
arrangements, and do not include our public debt indentures. In
the current period, we evaluated the effect under these
agreements of our restatements and out of period adjustments
identified in the current period, including our legal rights
with respect to any claims that could be asserted, such as our
ability to cure. Based on our review, we believe that, although
no assurances can be given as to the likelihood, nature or
amount of any claims that may be asserted, amounts at
September 30, 2008 subject to possible claims of
acceleration, termination or other remedies requiring payments
by us are not likely to exceed $2.5 billion, consisting
primarily of off-balance sheet arrangements. Moreover, we
believe there may be economic or other disincentives for third
parties to raise such claims to the extent they have them. Based
on this review, we reclassified $257 million of these
obligations from long-term debt to short-term debt at
December 31, 2006. At September 30, 2008 and
December 31, 2007, the amount of obligations reclassified
from long-term debt to short-term debt based on this review was
$136 million and $212 million, respectively. To date,
we have not received any such claims and we do not anticipate
receiving any such claims.
Subsequent to September 30, 2008, credit market volatility
increased significantly, creating broad credit concerns. If this
condition persists it will affect our ability to manage risks
related to market changes in foreign currency exchange rates,
interest rates and commodity prices to which we are exposed in
the ordinary course of business as some derivative
counterparties have been and may be unwilling to enter into
transactions with us due to our credit rating.
In addition, based on the provisions of SFAS No. 157,
which require companies to consider nonperformance risk, as part
of the measurement of fair value of derivative liabilities, we
may record changes in the fair value of our derivative
liabilities based on our current credit standing. At
September 30, 2008 our derivative liabilities totaled
$3.4 billion.
|
|
|
GMAC
Participation Agreement
|
On June 4, 2008, we, along with Cerberus ResCap Financing
LLC (Cerberus Fund) entered into a Participation Agreement
(Participation Agreement) with GMAC. The Participation Agreement
provides that we will fund up to $0.4 billion in loans made
by GMAC to ResCap through a $3.5 billion secured loan
facility GMAC has provided to ResCap (ResCap Facility), and that
the
105
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Cerberus Fund will fund up to $0.4 billion. The ResCap
Facility expires on May 1, 2010, and all funding pursuant
to the Participation Agreement is to be done on a pro-rata basis
between us and the Cerberus Fund.
We and the Cerberus Fund are required to fund our respective
portions of the Participation Agreement when the amount
outstanding pursuant to the ResCap Facility exceeds
$2.75 billion, unless a default event has occurred, in
which case we and the Cerberus Fund are required to fund our
respective maximum obligations. Amounts funded by us and the
Cerberus Fund pursuant to the Participation Agreement are
subordinate to GMACs interest in the ResCap Facility, and
all principal payments remitted by ResCap under the ResCap
Facility are applied to GMACs outstanding balance, until
such balance is zero. Principal payments remitted by ResCap
while GMACs outstanding balance is zero are applied on a
pro-rata basis to us and the Cerberus Fund.
The ResCap Facility is secured by various assets held by ResCap
and its subsidiaries, and we are entitled to receive interest at
LIBOR plus 2.75% for the amount we have funded pursuant to the
Participation Agreement. In addition, we and the Cerberus Fund
are also entitled to receive our pro-rata share of the 1.75%
interest on GMACs share of the total outstanding balance.
At September 30, 2008, ResCap had fully drawn down the
maximum amount pursuant to the ResCap Facility, and we had
funded our maximum obligation of $0.4 billion.
|
|
|
Financing
and Insurance Operations
|
Prior to the consummation of the GMAC Transaction, GMAC paid a
dividend to us of lease-related assets, having a net book value
of $4.0 billion and related deferred tax liabilities of
$1.8 billion. This dividend resulted in the transfer to us
of two bankruptcy-remote subsidiaries that hold equity interests
in ten trusts that own leased vehicles and issued asset-backed
securities collateralized by the vehicles. GMAC originated these
securitizations and remains as the servicer of the
securitizations. In August 2007 we entered into a secured
revolving credit arrangement of up to $1.3 billion that is
secured by the equity interest on these ten securitization
trusts. In connection with this credit facility, we contributed
these two bankruptcy remote subsidiaries into a third bankruptcy
remote subsidiary. We consolidate the bankruptcy-remote
subsidiaries and the ten trusts for financial reporting purposes.
At September 30, 2008, in connection with these
bankruptcy-remote subsidiaries we had vehicles subject to
operating leases of $2.9 billion compared to
$6.7 billion at December 31, 2007, other assets of
$1.0 billion compared to $1.4 billion at
December 31, 2007, outstanding secured debt of
$1.8 billion compared to $4.9 billion at
December 31, 2007 and equity of $2.0 billion compared
to $3.3 billion at December 31, 2007. The value of
vehicles subject to lease under these bankruptcy remote
subsidiaries at September 30, 2008 includes an impairment
charge of $0.1 billion recorded by our FIO segment in the
nine months ended September 30, 2008, as a result of lower
vehicle residual values given the deterioration in sport utility
vehicle and fullsize
pick-up
truck residual values in the three months ended June 30,
2008.
The decrease in operating leases, secured debt and equity from
December 31, 2007 is the result of the termination of some
leases in the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and the
repayment of the related secured debt. The secured debt has
recourse solely to the leased vehicles and related assets. We
continue to be obligated to the bankruptcy-remote subsidiaries
for residual support payments on the leased vehicles in an
amount estimated to equal $0.5 billion at
September 30, 2008 and $0.9 billion at
December 31, 2007, respectively. However, neither the
securitization investors nor the trusts have any rights to the
residual support payments. We expect the operating leases and
related securitization debt to gradually amortize over the next
one to two years, resulting in the release to these two
bankruptcy-remote subsidiaries of certain cash flows related to
their ownership of the securitization trusts and related
operating leases.
The cash flow that we expect to realize from the leased vehicle
securitizations over the next one to two years will come from
three principal sources: (1) cash released from the
securitizations on a monthly basis as a result of available
funds exceeding debt service and other required payments in that
month; (2) cash received upon and following termination of
a securitization to the extent of remaining over
collateralization; and (3) return of the residual support
payments owing from us each month. In the nine months ended
September 30, 2008, the total cash flows released to these
two bankruptcy-remote subsidiaries was $1.1 billion. In
aggregate, since the consummation of the GMAC Transaction,
$2.1 billion have been released from these subsidiaries.
106
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Negative industry conditions in North America continue to
increase the risks and costs associated with vehicle lease
financing. The impairments and increases in residual support and
risk sharing accruals related to lease assets in the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 were the results of reduced
expectations of the cash flows from these lease arrangements.
We have already taken steps to reduce the percentage of our
business that is retail leasing, with emphasis on curtailing
high risk areas by reducing contracts with 24 to 27 month
lease terms. GMAC, our largest provider of lease financing for
our vehicles, is implementing other initiatives to reduce the
risk in its lease portfolio, such as exiting incentive based
lease financing in Canada and reducing its lease volume in the
United States. We plan to continue to offer leasing options,
though likely more narrowly targeted to certain products and
segments. We are developing incentive programs to encourage
consumers to purchase versus lease vehicles. Lease financing was
used for approximately 16% of retail sales in the nine months
ended September 30, 2008.
Our fixed income securities are rated by four independent credit
rating agencies: Dominion Bond Rating Services (DBRS),
Moodys Investor Service (Moodys), Fitch Ratings
(Fitch), and Standard & Poors (S&P). The
ratings indicate the agencies assessment of a
companys ability to pay interest, distributions,
dividends, and principal on these securities. Lower credit
ratings generally represent higher borrowing costs and reduced
access to capital markets for a company. Their ratings of us are
based on information we provide as well as other sources. The
agencies consider a number of factors when determining a rating
including, but not limited to, cash flows, liquidity,
profitability, business position and risk profile, ability to
service debt, and the amount of debt as a component of total
capitalization.
DBRS, Moodys, Fitch, and S&P currently rate our
credit at non-investment grade. The following table summarizes
our credit ratings at November 7, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rating Agency
|
|
Corporate
|
|
Secured
|
|
Senior Unsecured
|
|
Outlook
|
|
DBRS
|
|
CC
|
|
CCC (low)
|
|
CC
|
|
Negative
|
Fitch
|
|
CCC
|
|
B
|
|
CCC-
|
|
Credit Watch
|
Moodys
|
|
Caa2
|
|
B1
|
|
Caa3
|
|
Negative
|
S&P
|
|
CCC+
|
|
B
|
|
CCC+
|
|
Credit Watch
|
Rating actions taken by each of the credit rating agencies from
July 1, 2008 through November 7, 2008 are as follows:
DBRS: On August 18, 2008, DBRS downgraded our Corporate
rating to B (low) from B (high), initiated coverage on our
Secured rating at RR2/B (high), and confirmed our Senior
Unsecured rating at RR4/CCC (high). On November 7, 2008,
DBRS downgraded our Corporate rating to CC from B (low),
our Senior Unsecured rating to CC from CCC (high), and our
Senior Secured rating to CCC (low) from B (high). The
outlook is negative.
Fitch: On September 22, 2008, Fitch downgraded our
Corporate rating to CCC from B-, our Senior Secured rating to
B/RR1 from BB-/RR1, and our Senior Unsecured rating to CCC-/RR5
from CCC+/RR5. On November 7, 2008, Fitch placed GMs
rating on Credit Watch with negative implications. The outlook
is negative.
Moodys: On July 15, 2008, Moodys Investors
Service placed our ratings under review for possible downgrade
and lowered our Speculative Grade Liquidity rating to SGL-2 from
SGL-1. On August 13, 2008, Moodys Investors Service
downgraded our Corporate ratings to Caa1 from B3, our Senior
Secured rating to B1 from Ba3, and our Senior Unsecured to Caa2
from Caa1. On October 27, 2008 Moodys Investor
Service downgraded our Corporate rating to Caa2 from Caa1, our
Senior Unsecured rating to Caa3 from Caa2, and our Senior
Secured rating remains at B1. Our Speculative Grade Liquidity
rating was lowered to SGL-4 from SGL-2. The outlook is negative.
S&P: On October 9, 2008, Standard and Poors
Rating Services placed our ratings under Credit Watch with
negative implications. On November 7, 2008, S&P
downgraded our Corporate rating and Senior Unsecured rating to
CCC+ from B- and our Senior Secured rating to B from B+. The
outlook is negative.
107
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
While our non-investment grade ratings have increased our
borrowing costs and limited our access to unsecured debt
markets, we have mitigated these results by actions taken over
the past few years to focus on increased use of liquidity
sources other than institutional unsecured markets that are not
directly affected by ratings on unsecured debt, including
secured funding sources and conduit facilities. Further
reductions of our credit ratings could increase the possibility
of additional terms and conditions contained in any new or
replacement financing arrangements. As a result of specific
funding actions taken over the past few years, we believe that
we will continue to have access to sufficient capital to meet
our ongoing funding needs over the short- and medium-term.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, we believe that our current
ratings situation and outlook increase the level of risk for
achieving our funding strategy as well as the importance of
successfully executing our plans to improve operating results.
Fair
Value Measurements
On January 1, 2008, we adopted SFAS No. 157,
which addresses aspects of the expanding application of fair
value accounting. Refer to Note 13 to the condensed
consolidated financial statements for additional information
regarding the adoption and effects of SFAS No. 157.
Subsequent to September 30, 2008, credit market volatility
increased significantly, creating broad credit concerns. If this
condition persists it will affect our ability to manage risks
related to market changes in foreign currency exchange rates,
interest rates and commodity prices to which we are exposed in
the ordinary course of business as some derivative
counterparties have been and may be unwilling to enter into
transactions with us due to our credit rating.
In addition, based on the provisions of SFAS No. 157,
which require companies to consider nonperformance risk, as part
of the measurement of fair value of derivative liabilities, we
may record changes in the fair value of our derivative
liabilities based on our current credit standing. At
September 30, 2008 our derivative liabilities totaled
$3.4 billion.
|
|
|
Fair
Value Measurements on a Recurring Basis
|
In connection with the adoption of SFAS No. 157, we
used Level 3, or significant unobservable inputs to measure
1.0% of the total assets that we measured at fair value, and
1.1% of the total liabilities that we measured at fair value.
Level 3 inputs are estimates that require significant
judgment and are therefore subject to change.
The more significant assets, with the related Level 3
inputs, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities Level 3 inputs
utilized in the fair value measurement process include estimated
prepayment and default rates on the underlying portfolio which
are embedded in a proprietary discounted cash flow projection
model.
|
|
|
Corporate debt and other securities Significant
components of this security category include structured
investment vehicles, which trade in a market with limited
liquidity. Level 3 inputs utilized in the fair value
measurement process include estimated recovery rates on the
underlying portfolio which are embedded in a proprietary
discounted cash flow projection model.
|
|
|
Commodity derivatives Commodity derivatives include
purchase contracts from various suppliers that are gross settled
in the physical commodity. Level 3 inputs utilized in the
fair value measurement process include estimated projected
selling prices, quantities purchased and counterparty credit
ratings, which are then discounted to the expected cash flow.
|
We adopted SFAS No. 157 on January 1, 2008 and
had no transfers in or out of Level 3 in the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2008.
108
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
Fair
Value Measurements on a Nonrecurring Basis
|
The following tables summarize the financial instruments
measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in periods
subsequent to initial recognition:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets
|
|
|
Significant Other
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Identical
|
|
|
Observable
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
Total Losses
|
|
|
Total Losses
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in GMAC Common Membership Interests
|
|
$
|
1,949
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,949
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(2,036
|
)
|
Investment in GMAC Preferred Membership Interests
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
(251
|
)
|
|
|
(1,001
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,992
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,992
|
|
|
$
|
(251
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,037
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In accordance with the provisions of APB No. 18, we review
the carrying values of our investments when events and
circumstances warrant. This review requires the comparison of
the fair values of our investments to their respective carrying
values. The fair value of our investments is determined based on
valuation techniques using the best information that is
available, and may include quoted market prices, market
comparables, and discounted cash flow projections. An impairment
loss would be recorded whenever a decline in fair value below
the carrying value is determined to be other than temporary.
At December 31, 2007 we disclosed that we did not believe
our investment in GMAC was impaired; however, there were many
economic factors which were unstable at that time. Such factors
included the instability of the global credit and mortgage
markets, deteriorating conditions in the residential and home
building markets, and credit downgrades of GMAC and GMACs
subsidiary, ResCap.
Through June 30, 2008 the economic factors mentioned above
deteriorated beyond our previous expectations. The instability
in the global credit and mortgage markets increased in North
America and spread throughout Europe, and the residential and
homebuilding markets continued to deteriorate in both
continents. These factors were exacerbated by the volatility in
the cost of fuel, which lead to a decline in consumer demand for
automobiles, particularly fullsize
pick-up
trucks and sport utility vehicles. This negatively affected
GMACs North American automotive business, as the decline
in certain residual values resulted in an impairment of vehicles
on operating leases, and an overall decline in automotive sales
resulted in a decline in the leasing and financing of vehicles.
In the three months ended September 30, 2008 the
instability of the credit markets intensified in North America
and Europe and resulted in an extreme lack of liquidity in the
global credit markets resulting in prominent North American
financial institutions declaring bankruptcy, being seized by the
FDIC, or being sold at distressed valuations.
These economic factors negatively affected GMACs North
American automotive business as well as ResCaps
residential mortgage business, which resulted in significant
losses for both GMACs North American automotive operations
and ResCap. Additionally, it was necessary for GMAC to continue
to provide support to ResCap, and GMACs and ResCaps
credit ratings were each further downgraded several times.
As a result of these factors, we evaluated our investment in
GMAC Common and Preferred Membership Interests for possible
impairment at each quarterly reporting period in 2008, and as a
result recorded impairment charges in each of the three month
periods ended March 31, June 30, and
September 30, 2008.
109
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
The following table summarizes the impairment charges we have
recorded against our investment in GMAC Common and Preferred
Membership Interests:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
GMAC Common Membership Interests
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,036
|
|
GMAC Preferred Membership Interests
|
|
|
251
|
|
|
|
1,001
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
251
|
|
|
$
|
3,037
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continued low or decreased demand for automobiles, continued or
increased instability of the global credit and mortgage markets,
the lack of available credit, or a recession in North America,
Europe, South America or Asia could further negatively affect
GMACs lines of business, and result in future impairments
of our investment in GMAC Common and Preferred Membership
Interests. Additionally, as GMAC provides financing to our
dealers as well as retail purchasers of our vehicles, further
deterioration in these economic factors could cause our vehicle
sales to decline.
In order to determine the fair value of our investment in GMAC
Common Membership Interests, we first determined a fair value of
GMAC by applying various valuation techniques to its significant
business units, and then applied our 49% equity interest to the
resulting fair value. Our determination of the fair value of
GMAC encompassed applying valuation techniques, which included
Level 3 inputs, to GMACs significant business units
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Auto Finance We obtained industry data, such as
equity and earnings ratios for other industry participants, and
developed average multiples for these companies based upon a
comparison of their businesses to Auto Finance.
|
|
|
Insurance We developed a peer group, based upon such
factors as equity and earnings ratios and developed average
multiples for these companies.
|
|
|
ResCap We previously obtained industry data for an
industry participant who we believe to be comparable, and also
utilized the implied valuation based on an acquisition of an
industry participant who we believe to be comparable. Due to
prevailing market conditions at September 30, 2008 we do
not believe that comparable industry participants exist;
however, we believe that previous data used, in conjunction with
certain publicly available information incorporated into our
analysis, results in an appropriate valuation at
September 30, 2008.
|
|
|
Commercial Finance Group We obtained industry data,
such as price and earnings ratios, for other industry
participants, and developed average multiples for these
companies based upon a comparison of their businesses to the
Commercial Finance Group.
|
In order to determine the fair value of our investment in GMAC
Preferred Membership Interests, we determined a fair value by
applying valuation techniques, which included Level 3
inputs, to various characteristics of the GMAC Preferred
Membership Interests as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Utilizing information as to the pricing on similar investments
and changes in yields of other GMAC securities, we developed a
discount rate for the valuation.
|
|
|
Utilizing assumptions as to the receipt of dividends on the GMAC
Preferred Membership Interests, the expected call date and a
discounted cash flow model, we developed a present value of the
related cash flows.
|
At June 30 and September 30, 2008 we adjusted our
assumptions as to the appropriate discount rate to utilize in
the valuation due to the changes in the market conditions which
occurred in these periods. Additionally, we adjusted our
assumptions as to the likelihood of payments of dividends and
call date of the Preferred Membership Interests.
|
|
|
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
|
We use off-balance sheet arrangements where the economics and
sound business principles warrant their use. Our principal use
of off-balance sheet arrangements occurs in connection with the
securitization and sale of financial assets.
110
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
The financial assets we sold consist principally of trade
receivables that are part of a securitization program in which
we have participated since 2004. This program expired on
September 17, 2008 and was not renewed. As part of this
program, we sold receivables to a wholly-owned bankruptcy remote
special purpose entity (SPE). The SPE is a separate legal entity
that assumes the risks and rewards of ownership of those
receivables. Receivables sold under the program were sold at
fair market value and were excluded from our condensed
consolidated balance sheets. The loss on trade receivables sold
was included in Automotive cost of sales and was
$2.6 million and $2.4 million in the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The banks and
the bank conduits had no beneficial interest in the eligible
pool of receivables at September 30, 2008,
December 31, 2007 and September 30, 2007. We did not
have a retained interest in the receivables sold, but performed
collection and administrative functions. The gross amount of
proceeds received from the sale of receivables under this
program was $1.6 billion and $0.6 billion in the nine
months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007.
In addition to this securitization program, we participate in
other trade receivable securitization programs in Europe. Some
of our direct or indirect subsidiaries have entered into
factoring agreements to sell certain trade receivables to banks
and to factoring companies. Limits are based on contractually
agreed upon amounts
and/or on
the entities balance of participating trade receivables.
In 2008 the average facility limits for the participating
entities were $79 million in total. The banks and factoring
companies had a beneficial interest of $24 million,
$26 million, and $18 million in the participating pool
of trade receivables at September 30, 2008,
December 31, 2007 and September 30, 2007, respectively.
We lease real estate and equipment from various off-balance
sheet entities that have been established to facilitate the
financing of those assets for us by nationally prominent lessors
that we believe are creditworthy. These assets consist
principally of office buildings and machinery and equipment. The
use of such entities allows the parties providing the financing
to isolate particular assets in a single entity and thereby
syndicate the financing to multiple third parties. This is a
conventional financing technique used to lower the cost of
borrowing and, thus, the lease cost to a lessee such as us.
There is a well-established market in which institutions
participate in the financing of such property through their
purchase of ownership interests in these entities, and each is
owned by institutions that are independent of, and not
affiliated with, us. We believe that no officers, directors or
employees of ours or our affiliates hold any direct or indirect
equity interests in such entities.
The following table summarizes assets in off-balance sheet
entities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Assets leased under operating leases
|
|
$
|
1,384
|
|
|
$
|
2,164
|
|
|
$
|
2,181
|
|
Trade receivables sold
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,408
|
|
|
$
|
2,251
|
|
|
$
|
2,264
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantees
Provided to Third Parties
|
We have provided guarantees related to the residual value of
operating leases, certain suppliers commitments, and
commercial loans made by GMAC and outstanding with certain third
parties. The maximum potential obligation under these
commitments is $796 million. This amount includes a
guarantee provided to GMAC in Brazil in connection with dealer
floor plan financing, which is secured by a $565 million
certificate of deposit purchased from GMAC to which we have
title.
In connection with certain divestitures of assets or operating
businesses, we have provided guarantees with respect to benefits
to be paid to former employees relating to pensions,
postretirement health care and life insurance, the most
significant of which we provided to Delphi. Since 2005, we have
recorded charges of $11.7 billion related to the guarantees
provided to Delphi. Due to the uncertainties surrounding
Delphis ability to emerge from bankruptcy it is reasonably
possible that we could record additional charges in the future,
but we currently are unable to estimate the amount of range of
such losses, if any.
Refer to Note 11 to the condensed consolidated financial
statements for additional information on guarantees we have
provided.
111
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
Decrease
in Contractual Obligations
|
In our 2007
10-K, we
reported minimum commitments under contractual obligations,
which included obligations under our then current contractual
labor agreements in North America. Before the Settlement
Agreement could become effective, the Settlement Agreement was
subject to the exhaustion of any appeals of the July 31,
2008 approval by the United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Michigan and the completion of discussions
between us and the staff of the SEC regarding the accounting
treatment for the transactions contemplated by the Settlement
Agreement on a basis we believed to be reasonably satisfactory.
The Settlement Agreement became effective in September 2008.
The finalization of the Settlement Agreement decreased our
related contractual obligations by $13.4 billion in the
aggregate.
The following table summarizes the decreases, by period, in our
contractual obligations as a result of the Settlement Agreement:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009-2010
|
|
|
2011-2012
|
|
|
2013 and after
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Postretirement benefits (a)(b)
|
|
$
|
3,338
|
|
|
$
|
6,802
|
|
|
$
|
4,814
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
14,954
|
|
Less: VEBA assets (a)
|
|
|
(3,338
|
)
|
|
|
(6,802
|
)
|
|
|
(4,814
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,954
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net postretirement benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increases due to finalization of the Settlement Agreement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,590
|
|
|
|
12,015
|
|
|
|
19,605
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,590
|
|
|
$
|
12,015
|
|
|
$
|
19,605
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining balance postretirement benefits (a)
|
|
$
|
728
|
|
|
$
|
1,772
|
|
|
$
|
5,248
|
|
|
$
|
41,311
|
|
|
$
|
49,059
|
|
Less: VEBA assets (a)
|
|
|
(728
|
)
|
|
|
(621
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,349
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,151
|
|
|
|
5,248
|
|
|
|
41,311
|
|
|
|
47,710
|
|
Net increases (decreases) due to finalization of the Settlement
Agreement
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
(246
|
)
|
|
|
(3,636
|
)
|
|
|
(29,286
|
)
|
|
|
(33,003
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
165
|
|
|
$
|
905
|
|
|
$
|
1,612
|
|
|
$
|
12,025
|
|
|
$
|
14,707
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
As reported in our 2007
10-K prior
to the finalization of the Settlement Agreement. |
(b) |
|
Amounts include postretirement benefits under the current
contractual labor agreements in North America. The remainder of
the estimated liability for benefits beyond the current labor
agreement and for essentially all salaried employees, is
classified under remaining balance of postretirement benefits.
These obligations are not contractual. |
Dividends
On July 14, 2008, our Board of Directors voted to suspend
dividends on our common stock indefinitely.
Dividends may be paid on our common stock when, as, and if
declared by our Board of Directors in its sole discretion out of
amounts available for dividends under applicable law. Under
Delaware law, our Board may declare dividends only to the extent
of our statutory surplus (i.e., total assets minus
total liabilities, in each case at fair market value, minus
statutory capital), or if there is no such surplus, out of our
net profits for the then current
and/or
immediately preceding fiscal year.
Our policy is to distribute dividends on our common stock based
on the outlook and indicated capital needs of the business. Cash
dividends per share on common stock were $0.50 and $0.75 in the
nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively
($0.25 per quarter in the three months ended March 31, 2008
and June 30, 2008 and $0.25 per quarter in the three months
ended March 31, 2007, June 30, 2007 and
September 30, 2007.) At the February 5, 2008 and
May 6, 2008 meetings of our Board of Directors, the Board
approved the payment of a $0.25 quarterly dividend on common
stock in the three months ended March 31, 2008 and
June 30, 2008, respectively.
112
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Employees
At September 30, 2008, we employed 252,000 employees. The
following table summarizes our employment by region:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
GMNA (a)
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
GME
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
GMLAAM
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
GMAP
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
Other
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
267
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Of the approximately 3,400 employees who have elected to
participate in the Salaried Window Program a majority have left
active employment prior to November 1, 2008. |
Critical
Accounting Estimates
Our condensed consolidated financial statements are prepared in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America, which requires the use of estimates,
judgments and assumptions that affect the reported assets and
liabilities at the financial statement dates and the reported
revenue and expenses for the periods presented. Our significant
accounting policies and critical accounting estimates are
consistent with those described in Note 2 to the
consolidated financial statements and the MD&A section in
our 2007
10-K, and
are included in our 2007
10-K in
their entirety. There were no significant changes in our
application of our critical accounting policies in the nine
months ended September 30, 2008 with the exception that we
adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 157, as further
described in Note 13 to the condensed consolidated
financial statements. We believe the accounting policies related
to our defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefits
plans, sales incentives, deferred taxes, provision for policy,
warranty and recalls, impairment of long-lived assets,
derivatives and valuation of vehicle operating lease and lease
residuals are most critical to aid in fully understanding and
evaluating our reported financial condition and results of
operations.
We believe that the accounting estimates employed are
appropriate and resulting balances are reasonable; however,
actual results could differ from the original estimates,
requiring adjustments to these balances in future periods. We
have discussed the development, selection and disclosures of our
critical accounting estimates with the Audit Committee of our
Board of Directors, and the Audit Committee has reviewed the
disclosures relating to these estimates. Significant changes to
our critical accounting estimates regarding defined benefit
pension and other postretirement benefits plans, deferred taxes,
the valuation of cost and equity method investments and the
valuation of vehicle operating leases and lease residuals are
discussed below.
We account for our defined benefit pension plans in accordance
with SFAS No. 87, Employers Accounting for
Pensions (SFAS No. 87) as amended by
SFAS No. 158, Employers Accounting for
Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement
Plans an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87,
88, 106, and 132(R) (SFAS No. 158) which
requires that amounts recognized in the financial statements be
determined on an actuarial basis. This determination involves
the selection of various assumptions, including an expected rate
of return on plan assets and a discount rate. Certain of our
pension plans were remeasured in the three months ended
September 30, 2008.
The expected return on plan assets that is included in pension
expense is determined from periodic studies, which include a
review of asset allocation strategies, anticipated future
long-term performance of individual asset classes, risks using
standard deviations, and correlations of returns among the asset
classes that comprise the plans asset mix. While the
studies give appropriate consideration to recent plan
performance and historical returns, the assumptions are
primarily long-term, prospective rates of return. Accordingly,
due to the primarily long-term nature of this assumption we have
not revised it
113
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
for the remeasurements performed in the three months ended
September 30, 2008, and further our net pension expense is
based on the expected return on plan assets and not the actual
return on plan assets. Differences between the expected return
on plan assets and the actual return on plan assets are recorded
to Other comprehensive income (loss) as an actuarial gain or
loss, and subject to possible amortization into net pension
expense over future periods. Therefore, despite the multiple
remeasurements of our pension plans in the three months ended
September 30, 2008, the effect of the recent downturn in
the financial markets has not yet significantly affected our net
pension expense.
Another key assumption in determining our net pension expense is
the assumed discount rate to be used to discount plan
obligations. In estimating this rate, we use an iterative
process based on a hypothetical investment in a portfolio of
high-quality bonds rated AA or higher by a recognized rating
agency and a hypothetical reinvestment of the proceeds of such
bonds upon maturity using forward rates derived from a yield
curve until our U.S. pension obligation is defeased. We
incorporate this reinvestment component into our methodology
because it is not feasible, in light of the magnitude and time
horizon over which our U.S. pension obligations extend, to
accomplish full defeasance through direct cash flows from an
actual set of bonds selected at any given measurement date.
As discussed in Note 10 to the condensed consolidated
financial statements, our U.S. hourly pension plan projected
benefit obligation (PBO) increased by $2.7 billion at
September 1, 2008 pursuant to the Settlement Agreement and,
as discussed in Note 11 to the condensed consolidated
financial statements, increased $2.7 billion at
September 30, 2008 pursuant to the Delphi First Hourly
Pension Transfer. Additionally, our U.S. salaried pension plan
PBO increased by $3.6 billion at July 1, 2008 pursuant
to our increase in pension benefits for salaried retirees over
65 provided to offset the elimination of postretirement medical
benefits. Accordingly, our sensitivity analysis regarding
discount rates included in our 2007
Form 10-K
may have changed significantly as a result of the aforementioned
increases in PBO.
|
|
|
Other
Postretirement Benefits
|
We account for our OPEB in accordance with
SFAS No. 106 as amended by SFAS No. 158,
which requires that amounts recognized in financial statements
be determined on an actuarial basis. This determination requires
the selection of various assumptions, including a discount rate
and health care cost trend rates used to value benefit
obligations. In estimating the discount rate, we use an
iterative process based on a hypothetical investment in a
portfolio of high-quality bonds rated AA or higher by a
recognized rating agency and a hypothetical reinvestment of the
proceeds of such bonds upon maturity using forward rates derived
from a yield curve until our U.S. OPEB obligation is defeased.
We incorporate this reinvestment component into our methodology
because it is not feasible, in light of the magnitude and time
horizon over which our U.S. OPEB obligations extend to
accomplish full defeasance through direct cash flows from an
actual set of bonds selected at any given measurement date. We
develop our estimate of the health care cost trend rates used to
value benefit obligations through review of historical retiree
cost data and near-term health care outlook which includes
appropriate cost control measures we have implemented. Changes
in the assumed discount rate or health care cost trend rate can
have significant effect on our actuarially determined obligation
and related OPEB expense.
Due to the events discussed in Note 10 to the condensed
consolidated financial statements, we remeasured our U.S. OPEB
obligation plans at various dates throughout the three months
ended September 30, 2008. The following are the significant
assumptions used in the measurement of the accumulated projected
benefit obligations (APBO) for the various interim
remeasurements:
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed Health-Care Trend Rates
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Initial health-care cost trend rate
|
|
|
8.2%
|
|
Ultimate health-care cost trend rate
|
|
|
5.0%
|
|
Number of years to ultimate trend rate
|
|
|
6
|
|
The U.S. health care trend rates are consistent with the rates
used at December 31, 2007. Although the health care cost
trend rate used in the remeasurements of our retiree medical
plans in the three months ended September 30, 2008 was
consistent with the rate used at December 31, 2007, the
effect of the health care cost trend rate on the remeasurements
of the UAW retiree medical plan obligation in the three months
ended September 30, 2008 was largely eliminated as a result
of the accounting
114
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
recognition of the Settlement Agreement. Accordingly, the effect
of the health care cost trend rate on the valuation of our
retiree health care obligations is significantly reduced from
that disclosed in our 2007
Form 10-K.
The measurement of the APBO also requires the selection of a
discount rate. For the UAW retiree medical plan, the discount
rate used in the three months ended September 30, 2008 was
based on a yield curve of representative high-quality AA rated
bonds for the benefits to be paid for the period from the
Effective Date to the Implementation Date and the Settlement
Agreements discount rate of 9% for cash flows occurring
after the Implementation Date. In estimating the discount rate
for our other retiree medical plans, the discount rate used in
the three months ended September 30, 2008 was based on a
yield curve of representative high-quality AA rated bonds
developed through the methodology described above.
In accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for
Income Taxes, (SFAS No. 109) valuation
allowances have been established for deferred tax assets based
on a more likely than not threshold. Our ability to
realize our deferred tax assets depends on our ability to
generate sufficient taxable income within the carryback or
carryforward periods provided for in the tax law for each
applicable tax jurisdiction. We consider the following possible
sources of taxable income when assessing the realization of our
deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
Future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences;
|
|
|
Future taxable income exclusive of reversing temporary
differences and carryforwards;
|
|
|
Taxable income in prior carryback years; and
|
|
|
Tax-planning strategies.
|
Concluding that a valuation allowance is not required is
difficult when there is significant negative evidence which is
objective and verifiable, such as cumulative losses in recent
years. We utilize a rolling three years of actual and current
year anticipated results as our primary measure of our
cumulative losses in recent years. However, because a
substantial portion of those cumulative losses relate to various
non-recurring matters and the implementation of our North
American Turnaround Plan, we adjust those three-year cumulative
results for the effect of these items. The analysis performed in
the three months ended September 30, 2007 and
March 31, 2008 indicated that in Canada, Germany, the
United Kingdom and the United States, we had cumulative
three-year losses on an adjusted basis. In Spain, we anticipated
being in a cumulative three-year loss position in the near-term.
This was considered significant negative evidence that is
objective and verifiable and therefore, difficult to overcome.
In addition our near-term financial outlook in these
jurisdictions had deteriorated. Furthermore, as it relates to
our assessment in the United States, many factors in our
evaluation are not within our control, particularly:
|
|
|
|
|
The possibility for continued or increasing price competition in
the highly competitive U.S. market;
|
|
|
Volatile fuel prices and the effect that may have on consumer
preferences related to our most profitable products, fullsize
pick-up
trucks and sport utility vehicles;
|
|
|
Uncertainty over the effect on our cost structure from more
stringent U.S. fuel economy and global emissions standards which
may require us to sell a significant volume of alternative fuel
vehicles across our portfolio;
|
|
|
Uncertainty as to the future operating results of GMAC; and
|
|
|
Acceleration of tax deductions for OPEB liabilities as compared
to prior expectations due to changes associated with the
Settlement Agreement.
|
Accordingly, in the three months ended September 30, 2007,
we concluded that the objectively verifiable negative evidence
of our recent historical losses combined with our challenging
near-term outlook out-weighed other factors and that it was more
likely than not that we would not generate taxable income to
realize our net deferred tax assets, in whole or in part in
Canada, Germany and the United States. As such, we recorded full
valuation allowances against our net deferred tax assets in
Canada, Germany and the United States of $39.0 billion in
the three months ended September 30, 2007. In the three
months ended March 31, 2008, we concluded that the
objectively verifiable negative evidence of our recent
historical losses combined with our challenging near-term
outlook out-weighed other factors and that it was more likely
than not that we will not generate taxable income to realize our
net deferred tax assets, in whole or in part in Spain and the
United Kingdom. As such, we recorded full valuation allowances
against our net deferred tax assets in Spain and the United
Kingdom of $379 million in the three months ended
March 31, 2008.
115
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
With regard to Canada, Germany, Spain, the United Kingdom and
the United States, we continue to believe that full valuation
allowances are needed against our net deferred tax assets. Our
three-year adjusted cumulative loss in the United States in
September 30, 2008 has increased from that at
December 31, 2007. The factors leading to our decision to
record full valuation allowances against our net deferred tax
assets in Spain and the United Kingdom are discussed in
Corporate and Other operations in this MD&A.
We currently have recorded full valuation allowances against our
net deferred tax assets in Brazil. Such valuation allowances
were initially recorded in 2005. In 2006, 2007 and in the nine
months ended September 30, 2008, we have generated taxable
income in Brazil and accordingly, have reversed a portion of
that valuation allowance to offset the tax provision for income
earned in those periods. It is reasonably possible that our
Brazilian operations will generate taxable income in 2008 and
may show a forecast of future taxable income at that time, which
may result in a change in our judgment regarding the need for a
full valuation allowance in Brazil. However, global economic
conditions have become increasingly unstable and it is not
possible to objectively verify this information at this time.
Accordingly, we have continued to conclude that it is more
likely than not that we will not realize our net deferred tax
assets in Brazil.
If, in the future, we generate taxable income in Canada,
Germany, Spain, the United Kingdom the United States or other
tax jurisdictions where we have recorded full valuation
allowances, on a sustained basis, our conclusion regarding the
need for full valuation allowances in these tax jurisdictions
could change, resulting in the reversal of some or all of the
valuation allowances. If our Canadian, German, Spanish, United
Kingdom, U.S. operations or operations in other tax
jurisdictions generate taxable income prior to reaching
profitability on a sustained basis, we would reverse a portion
of the valuation allowance related to the corresponding realized
tax benefit for that period, without changing our conclusions on
the need for a full valuation allowance against the remaining
net deferred tax assets.
|
|
|
Valuation
of Cost and Equity Method Investments
|
Equity investees accounted for under the cost or equity method
of accounting are evaluated for impairment in accordance with
APB No. 18. An impairment charge would be recorded whenever
a decline in value of an equity investment below its carrying
amount is determined to be other than temporary. In determining
if a decline is other than temporary we consider such factors as
the length of time and extent to which the fair value of the
investment has been less than the carrying amount of the equity
affiliate, the near-term and longer-term operating and financial
prospects of the affiliate and our intent and ability to hold
the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for any
anticipated recovery.
When available, we use quoted market prices to determine fair
value. If quoted market prices are not available, fair value is
based upon valuation techniques that use, where possible,
market-based inputs. Generally, fair value is estimated using a
combination of the income approach and the market approach.
Under the income approach, estimated future cash flows are
discounted at a rate commensurate with the risk involved using
marketplace assumptions. Under the market approach, valuations
are based on actual comparable market transactions and market
earnings and book value multiples for comparable entities. The
assumptions used in the income and market approaches have a
significant effect on the determination of fair value.
Significant assumptions include estimated future cash flows,
appropriate discount rates, and adjustments to market
transactions and market multiples for differences between the
market data and the equity affiliate being valued. Changes to
these assumptions could have a significant effect on the
valuation of our equity affiliates.
In the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, we
recorded impairment charges related to our Common Membership
Interests in GMAC of $0 and $2.0 billion and to our
Preferred Membership Interests in GMAC of $251 million and
$1.0 billion, respectively. In addition, we have continued
to record our proportionate share of GMACs loss. At
September 30, 2008, the balance of investment in our Common
Membership Interests in GMAC was $1.9 billion and the
balance of our Preferred Membership Interests in GMAC was
$43 million. It is reasonably possible that in the
near-term our proportionate share of future equity method losses
related to our Common Membership Interests would reduce our
recorded investment in these interests to zero. If this occurs,
we would continue to record our proportionate share of future
equity method losses to the extent of the sum of our additional
investments in and advances to GMAC, which includes our
Preferred Membership Interests and the participation in
GMACs loan to ResCap, and our commitments to provide
additional financial support to GMAC, which include our
guarantees of the residual values of vehicles on operating
leases.
116
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
Valuation
of Vehicle Operating Leases and Lease Residuals
|
In accounting for vehicle operating leases, we must make a
determination at the beginning of the lease of the estimated
realizable value (i.e., residual value) of the vehicle at the
end of the lease. Residual value represents an estimate of the
market value of the vehicle at the end of the lease term, which
typically ranges from nine months to four years. The customer is
obligated to make payments during the term of the lease to the
contract residual. However, since the customer is not obligated
to purchase the vehicle at the end of the contract, we are
exposed to a risk of loss to the extent the value of the vehicle
is below the residual value estimated at contract inception.
Residual values are initially determined by consulting
independently published residual value guides. Realization of
the residual values is dependent on our future ability to market
the vehicles under the prevailing market conditions. Over the
life of the lease, we evaluate the adequacy of our estimate of
the residual value and may make adjustments to the extent the
expected value of the vehicle at lease termination declines. The
adjustment may be in the form of revisions to the depreciation
rate or recognition of an impairment charge. Impairment is
determined to exist if the undiscounted expected future cash
flows are lower than the carrying value of the asset.
Additionally, for operating leases arising from vehicles sold to
dealers, an adjustment may also be made to the estimate of
marketing incentive accruals for residual support and risk
sharing programs initially recognized when vehicles are sold to
dealers. When a lease vehicle is returned to us, the asset is
reclassified from Equipment on operating leases, net to
Inventory at the lower of cost or estimated fair value, less
costs to sell.
In the three months ended September 30, 2008, we decreased
our accrual for residual support and risk sharing by
$0.7 billion due to our recent experience related to
dealer/lessee lease buy-outs and improvement in residual values
of fullsize pick-ups and sport utility vehicles. In the nine
months ended September 30, 2008 we increased our accrual
for residual support and risk sharing by a net $0.9 billion
and we recognized impairment charges of $0.1 billion.
Our depreciation methodology related to Equipment on operating
leases, net considers our expectation of the value of the
vehicles upon lease termination, which is based on numerous
assumptions and factors influencing used automotive vehicle
values. The critical assumptions underlying the estimated
carrying value of automotive lease assets include:
(1) estimated market value information obtained and used in
estimating residual values; (2) proper identification and
estimation of business conditions; (3) our remarketing
abilities; and (4) our vehicle and marketing programs.
Changes in these assumptions could have a significant effect the
value of the lease residuals.
We record the estimated effect of sales incentives to our
dealers and customers as a reduction of revenue at the later of
the time of sale or when an incentive program has been announced
to our dealers. There may be numerous types of incentives
available at any particular time, including a choice of
incentives for a specific model. Incentive programs are
generally brand specific, model specific or regionally specific,
and are for specified time periods, which may be extended.
Significant factors used in estimating the cost of incentives
include the volume of vehicles that will be affected by the
incentive programs offered by product, product mix and the rate
of customer acceptance of any incentive program, and the
likelihood that an incentive program will be extended, all of
which are estimated based on historical experience and
assumptions concerning customer behavior and future market
conditions. Additionally, when an incentive program is
announced, we determine the number of vehicles in dealer
inventory that are eligible for the incentive program, and
record a reduction of our revenue in the period in which the
program is announced. If the actual number of affected vehicles
differs from this estimate, or if a different mix of incentives
is actually paid, the reduction in revenue for sales incentives
could be affected. As discussed above, there are a multitude of
inputs affecting the calculation of the estimate for sales
incentives, an increase or decrease of any of these variables
could have a significant effect on the reduction of revenue for
sales incentives.
Accounting
Standards Not Yet Adopted
Accounting standards not yet adopted are discussed in
Note 2 to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
117
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Forward-Looking
Statements
In this report and in reports we subsequently file with the SEC
on
Forms 10-K
and 10-Q and
file or furnish on
Form 8-K,
and in related comments by our management, our use of the words
expect, anticipate,
estimate, forecast,
initiative, objective, plan,
goal, project, outlook,
priorities, target, intend,
when, evaluate, pursue,
seek, may, would,
could, should, believe,
potential, continue,
designed, impact or the negative of any
of those words or similar expressions is intended to identify
forward-looking statements that represent our current judgment
about possible future events. All statements in this report and
subsequent reports which we may file with the SEC on
Forms 10-K
and 10-Q or
file or furnish on
Form 8-K,
other than statements of historical fact, including without
limitation, statements about future events and financial
performance, are forward-looking statements that involve certain
risks and uncertainties. We believe these judgments are
reasonable, but these statements are not guarantees of any
events or financial results, and our actual results may differ
materially due to a variety of important factors that may be
revised or supplemented in subsequent reports on SEC
Forms 10-K,
10-Q and
8-K. Such
factors include among others the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Our ability to maintain adequate liquidity and financing sources
and an appropriate level of debt;
|
|
|
Our ability to complete planned asset sales;
|
|
|
Continued economic and automotive industry instability or poor
economic conditions in the U.S. and global markets, including
the credit markets, or changes in economic conditions, commodity
prices, housing prices, currency exchange rates or political
stability in the markets in which we operate;
|
|
|
Our ability to realize production efficiencies, to achieve
reductions in costs as a result of the turnaround restructuring
and health care cost reductions, to achieve planned levels of
working capital reductions and to implement capital expenditures
at levels and times planned by management;
|
|
|
Shortages of and price increases for fuel;
|
|
|
Market acceptance of our new products including cars and
crossover vehicles;
|
|
|
The ability of our customers, dealers, distributors and
suppliers to obtain adequate financing on acceptable terms to
continue their business relationships with us;
|
|
|
Significant changes in the competitive environment, including as
a result of industry consolidation, and the effect of
competition in our markets, including on our pricing policies or
use of incentives;
|
|
|
Changes in the existing, or the adoption of new laws,
regulations, policies or other activities of governments,
agencies and similar organizations where such actions may affect
the production, licensing, distribution or sale of our products,
the cost thereof or applicable tax rates;
|
|
|
The effectiveness of recent or future actions by the U.S.
federal government, including the $25 billion loan program
for automobile manufacturers and suppliers and recently enacted
legislation relating to mortgage assets;
|
|
|
Costs and risks associated with litigation;
|
|
|
The final results of investigations and inquiries by the SEC;
|
|
|
The potential effect if we receive a going concern
statement in our auditors report on our 2008 financial
statements;
|
|
|
Changes in accounting principles, or their application or
interpretation, and our ability to make estimates and the
assumptions underlying the estimates, including the estimates
for the Delphi pension benefit guarantees, which could result in
an effect on earnings;
|
|
|
Negotiations and bankruptcy court actions with respect to
Delphis obligations to us and our obligations to Delphi,
negotiations with respect to our obligations under the benefit
guarantees to Delphi employees and our ability to recover any
indemnity claims against Delphi;
|
|
|
Labor strikes or work stoppages at our facilities or our key
suppliers such as Delphi or financial difficulties at our key
suppliers such as Delphi;
|
|
|
Additional credit rating downgrades and the effects thereof; and
|
|
|
Changes in relations with unions and employees/retirees and the
legal interpretations of the agreements with those unions with
regard to employees/retirees, including the negotiation of new
collective bargaining agreements with unions representing our
employees in the United States other than the UAW.
|
118
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
In addition, GMACs actual results may differ materially
due to numerous important factors that are described in
GMACs most recent report on SEC
Form 10-K,
which may be revised or supplemented in subsequent reports on
SEC
Forms 10-K,
10-Q and
8-K. The
factors identified by GMAC include, among others, the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Rating agencies may downgrade their ratings for GMAC or ResCap
in the future, which would adversely affect GMACs ability
to raise capital in the debt markets at attractive rates and
increase the interest that it pays on its outstanding publicly
traded notes, which could have a material adverse effect on its
results of operations and financial condition;
|
|
|
GMACs business requires substantial capital, and if it is
unable to maintain adequate financing sources, its profitability
and financial condition will suffer and jeopardize its ability
to continue operations;
|
|
|
The profitability and financial condition of its operations are
dependent upon our operations, and it has substantial credit
exposure to us;
|
|
|
Recent developments in the residential mortgage market,
especially in the nonprime sector, may adversely affect
GMACs revenue, profitability and financial condition;
|
|
|
Changes in the competitive markets in which GMAC operates,
including increased competition in the automotive financing,
mortgage
and/or
insurance markets or generally in the markets for
securitizations or asset sales, its margins could be materially
adversely affected.
|
We caution investors not to place undue reliance on
forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to update
publicly or otherwise revise any forward-looking statements,
whether as a result of new information, future events or other
factors that affect the subject of these statements, except
where we are expressly required to do so by law.
* * * * * *
Item 3.
Quantitative And Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk
Except as discussed below, there have been no significant
changes in our exposure to market risk since December 31,
2007. Refer to Item 7A in our 2007
10-K.
Subsequent to September 30, 2008, credit market volatility
increased significantly, creating broad credit concerns. If this
condition persists it will affect our ability to manage risks
related to market changes in foreign currency exchange rates,
interest rates and commodity prices to which we are exposed in
the ordinary course of business as some derivative
counterparties have been and may be unwilling to enter into
transactions with us due to our credit rating.
In addition, based on the provisions of SFAS No. 157,
which require companies to consider nonperformance risk, as part
of the measurement of fair value of derivative liabilities, we
may record changes in the fair value of our derivative
liabilities based on our current credit standing. At
September 30, 2008 our derivative liabilities totaled
$3.4 billion.
* * * * * *
Item 4.
Controls and Procedures
Disclosure
Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures designed to
ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports
filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(Exchange Act), is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported
within the specified time periods and accumulated and
communicated to our management, including our principal
executive
119
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
officer, principal operating officer and principal financial
officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding
required disclosure.
Our management, with the participation of our Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer (CEO) and our Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer (CFO), evaluated the effectiveness of
our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Rules 13a-15(e)
or 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Exchange Act), at
September 30, 2008. Based on that evaluation, our CEO and
CFO concluded that, at that date, our disclosure controls and
procedures required by paragraph (b) of Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15
or 15d-15 were not effective at a reasonable assurance level
because of the identification of material weaknesses in our
internal control over financial reporting, which we view as an
integral part of our disclosure controls and procedures. The
effect of such weaknesses on our disclosure controls and
procedures, as well as remediation actions taken and planned,
are described in Item 9A, Controls and Procedures, of our
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Remediation
and Changes in Internal Controls
We developed and are in the process of implementing remediation
plans to address our material weaknesses. In the three months
ended September 30, 2008 we hired a new Manager of Internal
Controls and Sarbanes-Oxley Compliance to lead our corporate
testing efforts and improve our internal control over financial
reporting. The following specific remedial actions have been put
in place to address our material weaknesses.
Employee Benefits material weakness:
|
|
|
|
|
Established and are currently executing against a project plan
using internal and external resources to redesign, enhance and
strengthen our roles and responsibilities and processes related
to the communication and accounting for employee benefits.
|
|
|
Made significant progress in the compilation and analysis of
world-wide benefit arrangements.
|
|
|
Made significant progress in strengthening the controls over the
completeness and accuracy of census data for the actuarial
valuation process.
|
Income Tax Accounting material weakness:
|
|
|
|
|
Continued to re-design and strengthen our tax accounting process
using internal and external resources.
|
|
|
Implemented key controls at corporate and regions for identified
critical work streams.
|
Period End Financial Reporting Process material weakness:
|
|
|
|
|
Implemented more stringent authorization and review procedures
for manual journal entries recorded at the corporate level.
|
|
|
Performed parallel testing and user training for a new
consolidation system.
|
|
|
Developed enhanced controls and user checklists to be used with
the new consolidation system and related processes.
|
As discussed in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the years ended December 31, 2007 and December 31,
2006, management concluded that controls over the period end
financial reporting process were not operating effectively and
that ongoing remediation is necessary to ensure that the
following processes are implemented: (1) improved analysis;
(2) continued review of complex accounting estimates and
transactions; (3) integration of personnel with appropriate
technical expertise into the close process; and
(4) improved monitoring controls at Corporate Accounting
and business units.
As previously noted, we augmented the resources in Corporate
Accounting, the Tax Department and other key departments by
utilizing 179 external resources for the quarter and implemented
additional closing procedures in 2008. As a result, we believe
that there are no material inaccuracies or omissions of material
fact and, to the best of our knowledge, believe that the
condensed consolidated financial statements at and for the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2008, fairly present in
all material respects our financial condition and results of
operations in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America.
120
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Other than as described above, there have not been any other
changes in our internal control over financial reporting in the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, which have
materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Limitations
on the Effectiveness of Controls
Our management, including our CEO and CFO, does not expect that
our disclosure controls or our internal control over financial
reporting will prevent or detect all errors and all fraud. A
control system cannot provide absolute assurance due to its
inherent limitations; it is a process that involves human
diligence and compliance and is subject to lapses in judgment
and breakdowns resulting from human failures. A control system
also can be circumvented by collusion or improper management
override. Further, the design of a control system must reflect
the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits
of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because
of such limitations, disclosure controls and internal control
over financial reporting cannot prevent or detect all
misstatements, whether unintentional errors or fraud. However,
these inherent limitations are known features of the financial
reporting process, therefore, it is possible to design into the
process safeguards to reduce, though not eliminate, this risk.
* * * * *
PART II
Item 1.
Legal Proceedings
Canadian
Export Antitrust Class Actions
In the previously reported antitrust class action consolidated
in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maine, In re
New Market Vehicle Canadian Export Antitrust Litigation
Cases, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
reversed the certification of the injunctive class and ordered
dismissal of the injunctive claim on March 28, 2008. The
U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit also vacated the
certification of the damages class and remanded to the U.S.
District Court for the District of Maine for determination of
several issues concerning federal jurisdiction and, if such
jurisdiction still exists, for reconsideration of that class
certification on a more complete record. The parties are now
briefing for the District Court the defendants various
motions for summary judgment and motions in limine, as well as
plaintiffs renewed motion for class certification.
* * * * * * *
Health
Care Litigation 2007 Agreement
In the previously reported class lawsuit brought in the U.S.
District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan by the UAW
and eight putative class representatives, UAW, et al. v.
General Motors Corporation, we completed settlement
negotiations and entered into the Settlement Agreement with the
UAW and the putative classes on February 21, 2008. The
Court certified the class and granted preliminary approval of
the Settlement Agreement on March 4, 2008. Notice of the
settlement was mailed to 520,000 class members, and the final
hearing to review the fairness of the Settlement Agreement was
held on June 3, 2008. On July 31, 2008, the Court
approved the Settlement Agreement. On September 2, 2008,
the judgment became final as the period to file appeals related
to the Courts order expired, with no appeals filed.
121
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
* * * * * * *
GM
Securities and Shareholder Derivative Suits
In the previously reported case, In re General Motors
Corporation Securities and Derivative Litigation, on
September 23, 2008 the United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Michigan preliminarily approved the proposed
settlement in the GM Securities litigation. The court set a
hearing for final approval for December 22, 2008.
With regard to the shareholder derivative suits pending in the
United States District Court for the Eastern District of
Michigan, on September 23, 2008 the district court
preliminarily approved the settlement. The Court set a hearing
for final approval for December 22, 2008. The Notice and
Stipulation of Settlement are available at www.gm.com.
In the previously reported case, Salisbury
v. Barnevik, et al., brought in the Circuit Court of
Wayne County, Michigan, the Court has continued the stay in the
proceedings until November 2008.
* * * * * * *
GMAC
Bondholder Class Actions
With respect to the previously reported litigation consolidated
under the caption J&R Marketing SEP, et al. v. General
Motors Corporation, et al., on October 9, 2008, the
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied
plaintiffs motion for rehearing and rehearing en banc.
* * * * * * *
ERISA
Class Actions
In connection with the previously reported case In re General
Motors ERISA Litigation, the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Michigan gave final approval to the
proposed settlement on June 5, 2008. In July 2008, one of
the objectors to plaintiffs attorneys fees award
filed an appeal with the United States Court of Appeals for the
Sixth Circuit. On September 18, 2008, the Court of Appeals
dismissed the appeal upon appellant-objectors motion.
In connection with the previously reported cases of Young, et
al. v. General Motors Investment Management Corporation, et
al. and Mary M. Brewer, et al. v. General Motors
Investment Management Corporation, et al., on March 24,
2008 the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New
York granted our motions to dismiss both of these cases on
statute of limitations grounds. Plaintiffs have appealed the
dismissal in both cases.
* * * * * * *
Patent
and Trade Secrets Litigation
In the previously reported case John Evans and Evans Cooling
Systems, Inc. v. General Motors Corporation, on
October 28, 2008, the parties reached an agreement on a
term sheet to settle the case. A definitive agreement is being
drafted.
122
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
* * * * * * *
Coolant
System Class Action Litigation
As previously reported, in October 2007 the parties reached a
tentative settlement that would resolve certain claims in the
putative class actions related to alleged defects in the engine
cooling systems in our vehicles. The settlement received final
approval from the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri on
September 5, 2008 and from the Superior Court in Almeida
County, California on October 23, 2008. The ruling of the
California court remains subject to appeal.
As also previously reported, parallel class action was initiated
in Canada alleging that 1995 to 2003 vehicles with 3.1, 3.4, 3.8
and 4.3 liter engines suffered from engine cooling system
defects. On August 28, 2008, the parties reached a
tentative settlement of the Canadian litigation on essentially
the same terms as in the U.S. On October 30, 2008, the
Superior Court in Ontario approved that settlement. The approval
order remains subject to potential appeal.
* * * * * * *
Pick-up
Truck Parking Brake Litigation
The Corporation has been named in four class action lawsuits
alleging that certain 1998 through 2004 C/K
pick-up
trucks have defective parking brakes. The cases are Bryant v.
General Motors Corporation, filed on March 11, 2005 in
the Circuit Court for Miller County, Arkansas; Hunter v.
General Motors Corporation, filed on January 19, 2005
in Superior Court in Los Angeles, California; Chartrand v.
General Motors Corporation, et al. filed on October 26,
2005 in Supreme Court, British Columbia, Canada; and
Goodridge v. General Motors Corporation, et al. filed on
November 18, 2005 in the Superior Court of Justice,
Ontario, Canada. The complaints allege that parking brake spring
clips wear prematurely and cause failure of the parking brake
system, and seek compensatory damages for the cost of correcting
the alleged defect, interest costs and attorneys fees. The
two Canadian cases also seek punitive damages and general
damages of $500 million. On August 15, 2006, the
Miller County Circuit Court in the Bryant case certified
a nationwide class consisting of original and subsequent owners
of 1999 through 2002 GM series 1500
pick-up
trucks and sport utility vehicles equipped with automatic
transmissions and registered in the United States. On
June 19, 2008, the Supreme Court of Arkansas affirmed the
certification decision. We intend to file a petition for
certiorari seeking review of the certification decision in the
U.S. Supreme Court.
* * * * * * *
Environmental
Matters
Greenhouse
Gas Lawsuit
In the case of California ex rel. Lockyer v. General Motors
Corporation, et al., which has been previously reported, the
State of California filed its appeal brief in January 2008, and
the defendants filed their responsive brief in March 2008.
Several groups filed amicus briefs in support of the defendants,
including the State of Michigan, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce
and the National Association of Manufacturers.
* * * * * * *
123
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
EPA
Environmental Appeal Board Remands Hazardous Waste Region V
Case, Affecting Regions II and III Enforcements
On June 22, 2008 the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Environmental Appeal Board reversed and remanded a 2006
Administrative Law Judge ruling that had found us liable for
violating hazardous waste rules in Region V for the handling and
storage of used solvents. As previously reported, EPA Regions
II, III and V have brought enforcement actions against several
of our assembly plants seeking penalties for alleged
noncompliance with the Resource Conservation Recovery Act (RCRA)
rules for the handling and storage of solvents used to purge
colors from paint applicators. In March 2006 an administrative
law judge found us liable for RCRA violations at three plants in
Region V and assessed a $568,116 penalty. We are preparing for a
fact hearing on remand.
* * * * * * *
Item 1A.
Risk Factors
Other than discussed below, there have been no material changes
to the Risk Factors as previously disclosed in Part I,
Item 1A Risk Factors in our 2007
10-K.
|
|
|
We are
dependent on asset sales and other operating initiatives and
cash flow transactions because in the current environment our
operations do not generate sufficient cash to fund our
obligations as they come due.
|
Based on our estimated cash requirements through
December 31, 2009, we do not currently expect our
operations to generate sufficient cash flow to fund our
obligations as they come due, and we do not currently have other
traditional sources of liquidity available to fund these
obligations. Accordingly, we are pursuing a combination of
operating and related initiatives, as well as asset sales and
capital market activities, to generate incremental cash flows as
discussed above under the heading Management Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Liquidity and Capital Resources.
These efforts will be very challenging given the current
business environment and we cannot assure you that they will be
sufficient to meet our short-term, medium-term and long-term
liquidity needs.
In particular, one consequence of the global economic downturn
and credit crisis has been an erosion of consumer confidence and
demand for new vehicles, with October 2008 sales of light
vehicles for the U.S. industry falling to their lowest
level for October since 1982. Due to the prevailing global
economic conditions as well as our current financial condition
and near-term outlook, we currently do not have access to the
capital markets on acceptable terms for purposes of implementing
the $2 billion to $3 billion of fundraising that was
included in our July 2008 liquidity plan and continues to be an
important component of our capital planning. In addition, as a
result of the global credit market crisis, conditions for asset
sales have become very difficult as tight global credit
conditions have adversely affected the ability of potential
buyers to finance such asset purchases. We do not believe that
these adverse conditions are likely to improve significantly in
the near future.
|
|
|
Inadequate
liquidity could materially and adversely affect our business
operations in the future.
|
We require substantial liquidity to implement long-term cost
savings and restructuring plans, continue capital spending to
support product programs and development of advanced
technologies, meet scheduled term debt and lease maturities,
make scheduled cash contributions to the New VEBA trust for
postretirement health care and to run our regular business
operations. If we continue to operate at or close to the minimum
cash levels necessary to support our regular business
operations, we may be forced to further curtail capital
spending, research and development and other programs that are
important to the future success of our business. Our suppliers
could respond to an apparent weakening of our liquidity position
by requesting quicker payment of invoices or other assurances.
If this were to happen, our need for cash would be intensified,
and we may be unable to make payments to our suppliers as they
become due.
124
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Our efforts to maintain our liquidity position will be very
challenging given the current business environment. Moreover,
the full effect of many of these actions will not be realized
until later in 2009, even if they are successfully implemented.
Our ability to maintain adequate liquidity through the end of
2008 and during the first half of 2009 will depend significantly
on the level of vehicle sales, completion of some of our planned
asset sales, curtailment of operating expenses and capital
spending even further than planned, generation of additional
working capital or the availability of funding under one or more
current or future federal government programs. We are committed
to exploring all of these options because there is no assurance
that industry or capital markets conditions will improve within
that time frame. Even if we implement the planned operating
actions that are substantially within our control, our estimated
liquidity during the remainder of 2008 will be at or near the
minimum amount necessary to operate our business. Looking into
the first two quarters of 2009, even with our planned actions,
our estimated liquidity will fall significantly short of the
minimum required to operate our business unless economic and
automotive industry conditions significantly improve, we receive
substantial proceeds from asset sales, we take more aggressive
working capital initiatives, we gain access to capital markets
and other private sources of funding, we receive government
funding under one or more current or future programs, or some
combination of the foregoing occur.
In connection with their year-end audit of our annual financial
statements, our independent auditor assesses whether a statement
should be included in their audit report related to the
existence of substantial doubt related to our ability to
continue as a going concern. If the report on our audited
financial statements included such a statement, we would not be
in compliance with the covenants in certain significant credit
agreements, including our $4.5 billion secured revolving
credit facility and $1.5 billion U.S. term loan, both
of which would be callable by the lenders. Additionally, if we
fail to make payments on our obligations as they become due we
could be in default on our indebtedness. In this connection, we
have other significant obligations that include cross-defaults
provisions that could be triggered by a failure to comply with
those credit agreements. We would need to seek a waiver from the
lenders of any covenant breaches or cross defaults, or arrange
for substitute financing. There is no assurance that we could
cure a default, secure a waiver or arrange substitute financing
in such circumstances or that we would not incur significant
costs in doing so.
|
|
|
Deterioration
in U.S. and global financial markets has had and may continue to
have a material adverse impact on consumers, dealers and
suppliers.
|
The recent unprecedented deterioration in the U.S. and
global credit markets and the financial services industry has
negatively impacted our operations in several ways. For
instance, market turmoil and tightening of credit, as well as
the recent and dramatic decline in the housing market in the
United States and Western Europe, has led to a lack of consumer
confidence and widespread reduction of business activity
generally and specifically to a rapid decline in vehicle
purchases, which reduces our automotive revenues and operating
cash flow. The recent decline in stock prices has also reduced
the availability of funds for customers, dealers and suppliers
that invested directly or indirectly in the stock market.
In addition, some of our suppliers are experiencing serious cash
flow problems due to the credit market crisis, which could be
aggravated by a reduction in production volumes not only by us
but also by our competitors, who frequently purchase from the
same suppliers that we do. When similar situations have occurred
in the past, our suppliers have attempted to increase their
prices, pass through increased costs, alter payment terms or
seek other relief. Some of our suppliers may be forced to reduce
their output, shut down their operations or file for bankruptcy
protection, which in some cases would make it difficult for us
to continue production of certain vehicles.
We do not expect that the difficult economic conditions, and
their effect on the automotive industry, are likely to improve
significantly in the near future, and any continuation or
worsening of the credit crisis, or even the fear of such a
development, could intensify the adverse effects of these
difficult market conditions.
|
|
|
Negative
developments in the availability or terms of consumer credit
through GMAC or other sources could adversely affect our
sales.
|
Based on our historical relationship, GMAC finances a
significant percentage of our vehicle sales and virtually all of
our U.S. sales involving subsidized financing such as sales
incentives. Due to the current conditions in credit markets,
GMAC is experiencing difficulty accessing new funding, and other
sources of financing are not readily available to fully replace
GMACs
125
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
role in supporting our dealers and their retail customers. GMAC
recently announced that it has raised credit standards for new
vehicle purchasers. In addition, GMAC has stopped leasing in
Canada and has almost eliminated the availability of vehicle
leases in the U.S. due to the scarcity of new funding and
the steep decline in residual values of leased vehicles. If
consumers are unable to obtain financing on a timely basis and
on reasonable terms, demand for our vehicles could be adversely
affected. Many of our competitors have captive finance
subsidiaries that are better capitalized than GMAC and so may be
able to offer credit to consumers on better terms than GMAC is
able to offer. Additionally, other lenders have tightened their
lending standards making it more difficult for consumers to
qualify for loans or to borrow money on a timely basis or
reasonable terms, which could reduce the demand for our vehicles.
Similarly, many of the dealers that sell our products rely on
GMAC financing to purchase our vehicles on a wholesale basis.
Any decline in the availability of GMAC wholesale dealer
financing, whether as a result of GMACs liquidity
constraints or otherwise, may cause dealers to modify, delay or
cancel their plans to purchase vehicles from us. Additionally,
any decline in the availability of other sources of dealer
financing could have a similar adverse effect.
|
|
|
Consolidation
within the automotive industry may provide our competitors with
a cost or strategic advantage.
|
The automotive industry is highly competitive and manufacturing
capacity currently exceeds demand, particularly in established
markets like the United States and Europe, which have
traditionally accounted for a significant portion of our sales
and profitability. Many analysts predict consolidation will
occur in the auto industry in response to the current industry
weakness. We recently explored the possibility of a strategic
acquisition that we believed would generate significant cost
reduction synergies and substantially strengthen our financial
position in the medium and long term, while being neutral or
modestly positive to cash flow even in the near term. While the
acquisition could potentially have provided significant
benefits, we have concluded that it is more important at the
present time to focus on our immediate liquidity challenges and,
accordingly, we have set aside consideration of such a
transaction as a near-term priority.
If industry consolidation occurs among our competitors, they may
be able to reduce their fixed costs, achieve higher levels of
penetration in the markets in which we compete, gain access to
new technologies and take advantage of other synergies. Such
consolidation by our competitors could lead to increased
competition with more efficient manufacturers in the markets in
which we operate and have an adverse affect on our business.
|
|
|
There
can be no assurance that the $25 billion loan program for
automobile manufacturers and suppliers will provide loans to us
on a timely or sufficient basis.
|
The EISA authorizes the DOE to lend up to $25 billion on
favorable terms to automobile manufacturers and suppliers. We
can provide no assurance, however, as to the amount or timing of
any loans that might be made available to us under the program.
Under the EISA, the DOE is authorized to select projects by
determining whether the loan recipient (1) is financially
viable without the receipt of the federal loan, (2) will
provide sufficient information to the DOE to ensure that the
funds are expended efficiently and effectively and (3) has
met other criteria that may be established by the DOE. In
addition, in order for an automobile manufacturer to be eligible
for a loan it must satisfy average fuel economy requirements set
forth in regulations promulgated by the DOE. These various
criteria and limitations could materially diminish our benefits
from this program.
Although we believe, based on our preliminary analysis of these
issued regulations, that a significant number of our projects
through 2014 may qualify for funding under this program,
the actual qualification of these projects will be subject to
DOE review and approval. In addition, we expect that many
vehicle manufacturers and their suppliers will apply for loans
and assistance under this program, so it is not clear how much
of the total $25 billion of authorized loans will be made
available to us. Furthermore, it is not clear how soon any loans
might be made available to us, and the timing of disbursements
of loan funding for any approved project would also depend upon
the timing of our expenditures for those projects.
|
|
|
There
can be no assurance that the global automobile market will not
suffer a significant further downturn.
|
The challenging automobile market conditions that began a few
years ago in North America have continued and in the most recent
quarter expanded to some of our other operating regions. While
the recent financial crisis and turmoil has affected our
126
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
vehicle sales in historically mature markets more severely than
our sales in emerging markets, all regions and countries around
the world are affected by the global turmoil caused by the
severe limitations on availability of credit, the threat of
global recession, the uncertainty of the global credit and
mortgage markets and the volatility of oil prices. These
world-wide economic problems could lead to a significant further
downturn in the global automobile market and adversely affect
our automotive sales in all of our operating regions.
|
|
|
We
have agreed to fund a trust pursuant to the Settlement Agreement
that will require us to contribute significant assets in a
relatively short time period.
|
If the arrangements contemplated by the Settlement Agreement are
implemented as expected in January 2010, we will be required to
pay or transfer more than $25 billion in assets to the New
VEBA in a relatively short time period. This amount includes
$7.5 billion in cash, the transfer of $4.4 billion in
convertible notes that were previously issued to a wholly-owned
subsidiary and will mature in December 2012, and the transfer of
amounts already funded by us in existing VEBAs. These payments
or transfers will be made in the first three months of 2010.
Further, in 2010, we may transfer an additional
$5.6 billion to the New VEBA, subject to adjustment, or we
may instead opt to make annual payments of varying amounts
between $421 million and $3.3 billion through 2020. We
may also contribute $1.6 billion immediately or opt to make
up to 19 contingent payments of $165 million as necessary
to support the New VEBAs future solvency. Based on our
estimated cash requirements through December 31, 2009, we
do not currently expect our operations to generate sufficient
cash flow to fund these obligations as they come due, and we do
not currently have other traditional sources of liquidity
available to fund these obligations. Accordingly, we are
pursuing a combination of additional operating and related
initiatives, as well as asset sales and capital market
activities, to generate incremental cash flows. There can be no
assurance, however, that we will be able to obtain all of the
necessary funding that has not been set aside in existing VEBA
trusts on terms that will be acceptable.
|
|
|
New
laws, regulations or policies of governmental organizations
regarding increased fuel economy requirements and reduced
greenhouse gas emissions, or changes in existing ones, may have
a significant negative effect on how we do
business.
|
We are affected significantly by a substantial amount of
governmental regulations that increase costs related to the
production of our vehicles and affect our product portfolio. We
anticipate that the number and extent of these regulations, and
the costs and changes to our product
line-up to
comply with them, will increase significantly in the future. In
the United States and Europe, for example, governmental
regulation is primarily driven by concerns about the environment
(including
CO2
emissions), vehicle safety and fuel economy. These government
regulatory requirements complicate our plans for global product
development and may result in substantial costs, which can be
difficult to pass through to our customers, and may result in
limits on the types of vehicles we sell and where we sell them,
which can affect revenue.
The Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) requirements mandated
by the U.S. government pose special concerns. In December
2007, the United States enacted the Energy Independence and
Security Act of 2007, a new energy law that will require
significant increases in CAFE requirements applicable to cars
and light trucks beginning in the 2011 model year in order to
increase the combined U.S. fleet average for cars and light
trucks to at least 35 miles per gallon by 2020, a 40%
increase. The estimated cost to the automotive industry of
complying with this new standard will likely exceed
$100 billion, and our compliance cost could require us to
alter our capital spending and research and development plans,
curtail sales of our higher margin vehicles, cease production of
certain models or even exit certain segments of the vehicle
market. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
(NHTSA) has issued a proposed rule to set the car and truck
standards for the 2011 2015 model years and to make
changes to the form of the standards and the associated credit
mechanism. In comments we and the Alliance of Automobile
Manufacturers, a trade association to which we belong, submitted
we urged NHTSA to consider our concerns about the accuracy of
the technology analyses used by NHTSA to estimate the costs and
benefits of the proposed standards, and consider revising its
overly aggressive rate of increase in the standards.
In addition, California and 12 other states have adopted a set
of rules establishing
CO2
emission standards that effectively impose similarly increased
fuel economy standards for new vehicles sold in those states (AB
1493 Rules). In addition, there are several other states
considering the adoption of such standards. If stringent
CO2
emission standards are imposed on us on a
state-by-state
basis, the result could be even more disruptive to our business
than the higher CAFE standards discussed above.
127
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
The automotive industry has filed legal challenges to these
state standards in California, Vermont and Rhode Island and
dealers have filed a similar challenge in New Mexico. On
September 12, 2007, the U.S. District Court for the
District of Vermont rejected the industrys position that
such state regulation of
CO2
emissions is preempted by federal fuel economy and air pollution
laws. While the plaintiffs including us have appealed this
decision and submitted opening briefs, there can be no assurance
that the lower courts order will be reversed. On
December 12, 2007, the U.S. District Court for the
Eastern District of California ruled against the federal
preemption arguments made by the automotive industry but did not
lift its order enjoining California from enforcing the AB 1493
Rules in the absence of a waiver by the EPA. The industry has
responded to that ruling by seeking a permanent injunction
against the AB 1493 Rules. A related challenge in California
state court is pending. On December 21, 2007, the
U.S. District Court for the District of Rhode Island denied
the states motion to dismiss the industry challenge and
announced steps for the case to proceed to trial. The defendants
in the Rhode Island case have moved for dismissal of our
complaint, and we are preparing a response. There can be no
assurance that these legal challenges to the AB 1493 Rules will
succeed.
On February 29, 2008, the EPA formally denied
Californias request for a waiver of federal preemption of
its AB 1493 Rules. As a result, at this time the AB 1493 Rules
cannot be enforced in California or any other state. California
and many other states and non-governmental organizations,
however, have filed actions in several federal courts to have
the EPAs denial overturned. The EPA and automotive
industry have filed to have these cases dismissed. In addition,
the two leading Presidential candidates have expressed support
for the AB 1493 Rules, and indicating that the EPAs
decision may be reversed in a future administration, thereby
permitting those Rules to be enforced in all the states that
have adopted or will adopt them. There can be no assurance that
the legal efforts to dismiss or deny the challenges to the
EPAs action will succeed. As a result of the failure of
the legal efforts, or a different decision by a successor EPA
Administrator, the AB 1493 Rules might become enforceable.
In addition, a number of countries in Europe are adopting or
amending regulations that establish
CO2
emission standards or other frameworks that effectively impose
similarly increased fuel economy standards for vehicles sold in
those countries, or establish vehicle-related tax structures
based on them.
|
|
|
Delphi
is unlikely to emerge from bankruptcy in the near-term and
possibly may not emerge at all.
|
In January 2008, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court entered an order
confirming Delphis POR and related agreements including
certain agreements with us. On April 4, 2008 Delphi
announced that, although it had met the conditions required to
substantially consummate its POR, including obtaining exit
financing, Delphis plan investors refused to participate
in a closing that was commenced but not completed on that date.
The current credit markets, the lack of plan investors and the
challenges facing the auto industry make it difficult for Delphi
to emerge from bankruptcy. As a result, it is unlikely that
Delphi will emerge from bankruptcy in the near-term, and it is
possible that it may not emerge successfully or at all. We
believe that Delphi will continue to seek alternative
arrangements to emerge from bankruptcy, but there can be no
assurance that Delphi will be successful in obtaining any
alternative arrangements. In October 2008 we agreed subject to
certain conditions to extend our outstanding $300 million
advance to June 30, 2009 and to accelerate our North
American payables to Delphi in the second quarter of 2009, so
that Delphi would have additional liquidity. We may choose to
assist Delphi further by providing additional financial support
to Delphi, receiving significantly less than the distributions
that we expect from the resolution of Delphis bankruptcy
proceedings or assuming some of Delphis obligations to its
workforce and retirees, if such support would be in our
interest. In addition, if Delphi is unable to successfully
emerge from bankruptcy in the near term, it may be forced to
sell all of its assets. As a result, we may be required to pay
additional amounts to secure the parts we need until alternative
suppliers are secured or new contracts are executed with the
buyers of Delphis assets. In addition the Benefit
Guarantee Agreements may be triggered, which would result in
additional liabilities to us. We may also be subject to
additional litigation regarding Delphi.
|
|
|
Financial
difficulties, labor stoppages or work slowdowns at key suppliers
could result in a disruption in our operations and have a
material adverse effect on our business.
|
We rely on many suppliers to provide us with the systems,
components and parts that we need to manufacture our automotive
products and operate our business. In recent years, a number of
these suppliers, including but not limited to Delphi, have
experienced severe financial difficulties and solvency problems
and some have reorganized under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.
This trend has intensified in recent months. Financial
difficulties or solvency problems at these or other suppliers
could
128
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
materially adversely affect their ability to supply us with the
systems, components and parts that we need, which could disrupt
our operations including production of certain of our higher
margin vehicles. It may be difficult to find a replacement for
certain suppliers without significant delay. Similarly, a
substantial portion of many of these suppliers workforces
are represented by labor unions. Workforce disputes that result
in work stoppages or slowdowns at these suppliers could also
have a material adverse effect on their ability to continue
meeting our needs.
|
|
|
Our
significant investment in new technology may not result in
successful vehicle applications.
|
We intend to invest approximately $4.8 billion in 2009 to
support our products and to develop new technology, and we have
announced that capital expenditures after 2009 will stabilize in
the range of $6.5 billion to $7.0 billion per year. In
some cases, such as hydrogen fuel cells, the technologies are
not yet commercially practical and depend on significant future
technological advances by us and by suppliers, especially in the
area of advanced battery technology. For example, we have
announced that we intend to produce by November 2010 the
Chevrolet Volt, an electric car, which requires battery
technology that has not yet proven to be commercially viable.
There can be no assurance that these advances will occur in a
timely or feasible way, that the funds that we have budgeted for
these purposes will be adequate or that we will be able to
establish our right to these technologies. Moreover, our
competitors and others are pursuing the same technologies and
other competing technologies, in some cases with more money
available, and there can be no assurance that they will not
acquire similar or superior technologies sooner than we do or on
an exclusive basis or at a significant price advantage. Finally,
if our announced plans to conserve and generate liquidity do not
succeed, we may be forced to reduce, delay or cancel our planned
investments in new technology in order to maintain adequate
liquidity to fund our business operations and meet our
obligations as they come due.
|
|
|
Our
indebtedness and other financial obligations are significant and
could negatively impact our operations in future
periods.
|
We have a substantial amount of indebtedness, which requires
significant interest and principal payments. At
September 30, 2008, we had approximately $45 billion
in outstanding debt. In addition, under the Settlement Agreement
with the UAW, we are obligated to pay more than
$7.5 billion in early 2010. Our plans to generate increased
liquidity include asset sales, curtailing operating and capital
expenditures, generating additional working capital, accessing
capital markets and obtaining government funding under one or
more programs. Any additional indebtedness we add to our current
debt levels through capital market activities, federal funding
or other transactions to enhance liquidity would increase the
impact of the related risks described below.
Our significant indebtedness may have several important
consequences, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Requiring us to dedicate a significant portion of our cash flow
from operations to the payment of principal and interest on our
indebtedness, which will reduce the funds available for other
purposes, such as product development;
|
|
|
Making it more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations with
respect to our outstanding loans payable, long-term indebtedness
and amounts due under the Settlement Agreement;
|
|
|
Impairing our ability to obtain additional financing for working
capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, refinancing
indebtedness or other purposes;
|
|
|
Limiting our ability to take advantage of business opportunities
as they arise;
|
|
|
Placing us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our
competitors that have less debt or are less leveraged;
|
|
|
Limiting our ability to withstand competitive pressures and
reducing our flexibility in responding to changing business and
economic conditions and
|
|
|
Increasing our vulnerability to interest rate increases, since
certain of our borrowings are at variable rates.
|
|
|
|
Our
business may be materially affected by decreases in the residual
value of off-lease vehicles.
|
In addition to the effect on GMAC of the residual value of
off-lease vehicles discussed in our 2007
10-K Risk
Factors, we are also negatively affected by decreases in the
residual value of off-lease vehicles through our residual
support programs, our ownership of lease-related assets and the
effect of leasing activity on our retail sales. We record an
estimate of marketing incentive accruals for residual support
and risk sharing programs when vehicles are sold to dealers. To
the extent the residual
129
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
value of off-lease vehicles decreases, we are required to
increase our estimate of the residual support required to be
provided to GMAC to subvent leases or increase risk sharing
payments to GMAC. We also own certain lease-related assets that
GMAC paid to us as a dividend prior to the consummation of the
GMAC Transaction, the value of which would be impaired by
decreases in the residual value of off-lease vehicles. In
addition, changes in expected lease residual values may affect
the cost of leasing transactions and the types of leasing
transactions available to end-use customers. Fewer financing
options could make purchasing a vehicle less attractive. Should
market conditions continue to drive further reduction in the
residual value of leased vehicles, we may suspend or eliminate
lease financing. The elimination of this financing alternative
could have a negative effect on our operations. Any one or more
of these consequences could have a material adverse effect on
our business.
Risks
related to our 49% equity interest in GMAC
Risks
Related to GMACs Business
|
|
|
GMACs
business and the businesses of its subsidiaries, including
ResCap, require substantial capital, and continued disruption in
its funding sources and access to the capital markets could
continue to have a material adverse effect on its liquidity and
financial condition.
|
GMACs liquidity and ongoing profitability are, in large
part, dependent upon its timely access to capital and the costs
associated with raising funds in different segments of the
capital markets. GMAC depends and will continue to depend on its
ability to access diversified funding alternatives to meet
future cash flow requirements and to continue to fund its
operations. GMACs funding strategy and liquidity position
have been significantly adversely affected by the ongoing stress
in the credit markets that began in the middle of 2007 and
reached unprecedented levels during recent months. The capital
markets remain highly volatile, and access to liquidity has been
significantly reduced. These conditions, in addition to the
reduction in its credit ratings, have resulted in increased
borrowing costs and its inability to access the unsecured debt
markets in a cost-effective manner. This has resulted in an
increased reliance on asset-backed and other secured sources of
funding. Some of these facilities have not renewed placing
additional pressure on its liquidity position. GMACs
inability to renew the remaining loans and facilities as they
mature could have a further negative impact on its liquidity
position. GMAC also has significant maturities of unsecured
notes each year. In order to retire these instruments, it either
will need to refinance this debt or generate sufficient cash to
retire the debt.
In addition, continued or further negative events specific to
GMAC or us, as GMACs 49% owner and largest customer, could
further adversely impact its funding sources. Furthermore, GMAC
has recently provided a significant amount of funding to ResCap
and may provide additional funding to ResCap in the future; as a
result, any negative events with respect to ResCap could serve
as a drain on GMACs financial resources and have an
adverse effect on its liquidity and consolidated financial
position. GMAC has not made, and is not making, any commitment
to continue to fund ResCap or to forgive ResCap debt and is
not subject to any contractual obligation to do so.
ResCaps liquidity has been significantly impaired, and may
be further impaired, due to circumstances beyond GMACs
control, such as adverse changes in the economy and general
market conditions. Continued deterioration in GMACs
business performance could further limit, and recent reductions
in ResCaps credit ratings have limited, ResCaps
ability to access the capital markets on favorable terms. During
recent volatile times in the capital and secondary markets,
especially since August 2007, access to aggregation and other
forms of financing, as well as access to securitization and
secondary markets for the sale of ResCaps loans, has been
severely constricted. Furthermore, GMACs access to capital
has been impacted by changes in the market value of its mortgage
products and the willingness of market participants to provide
liquidity for such products.
|
|
|
The
profitability and financial condition of GMACs operations
are heavily dependent upon our operations.
|
A significant portion of GMACs customers are our customers
and our dealers and employees. As a result, a significant
adverse change in our business, including significant adverse
changes in our liquidity position and access to the capital
markets, the production or sale of our vehicles, the quality or
resale value of our vehicles, our use of marketing incentives,
our relationships with our key suppliers, our relationship with
the UAW and other labor unions and other factors impacting us or
our employees could have a significantly adverse effect on
GMACs profitability and financial condition.
130
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
GMAC provides vehicle financing through purchases of retail
automotive and lease contracts with retail customers of
primarily our dealers. GMAC also finances the purchase of new
and used vehicles by our dealers through wholesale financing,
extends other financing to our dealers, provides fleet financing
for our dealers to buy vehicles they rent or lease to others,
provides wholesale vehicle inventory insurance to our dealers,
provides automotive extended service contracts through our
dealers and offers other services to our dealers. In 2007,
GMACs shares of our retail sales and sales to dealers were
35% and 82%, respectively, in markets where we operate. As a
result, our level of automobile production and sales directly
impacts GMACs financing and leasing volume, the premium
revenue for wholesale vehicle inventory insurance, the volume of
automotive extended service contracts and the profitability and
financial condition of our dealers to which GMAC provides
wholesale financing, term loans and fleet financing. In
addition, the quality of our vehicles affects GMACs
obligations under automotive extended service contracts relating
to such vehicles. Further, the resale value of our vehicles,
which may be impacted by various factors relating to our
business such as brand image or the number of new vehicles we
produce, affects the remarketing proceeds GMAC receives upon the
sale of repossessed vehicles and off-lease vehicles at lease
termination.
|
|
|
The
occurrence of recent adverse developments in the mortgage
finance and credit markets has adversely affected ResCaps
business, liquidity and capital position and has raised
substantial doubt about ResCaps ability to continue as a
going concern.
|
ResCap has been negatively impacted by the events and conditions
in the broader mortgage banking industry, most severely but not
limited to the nonprime and nonconforming mortgage loan markets.
Fair market valuations of mortgage loans held-for-sale, mortgage
servicing rights, securitized interests that continue to be held
by ResCap and other assets and liabilities it records at fair
value have significantly deteriorated due to weakening housing
prices, increasing rates of delinquencies and defaults of
mortgage loans. These same deteriorating factors have also
resulted in higher provision for loan losses on ResCaps
mortgage loans held-for-investment and real estate lending
portfolios. The market deterioration has resulted in rating
agency downgrades of asset- and mortgage-backed securities which
in turn has led to fewer sources of, and significantly reduced
levels of, liquidity available to finance ResCaps
operations. Most recently, the widely publicized credit defaults
and/or
acquisitions of large financial institutions in the marketplace
has further restricted credit in the United States and
international lending markets. ResCap is highly leveraged
relative to its cash flow and continues to recognize substantial
losses resulting in a significant deterioration in capital.
Furthermore, in light of the decline in ResCaps
consolidated tangible net worth, as defined, Fannie Mae has
requested additional security for some of ResCaps
potential obligations under its agreements with them. ResCap has
reached an agreement in principle with Fannie Mae, under the
terms of which ResCap will provide them additional collateral
valued at $200 million, and agree to sell and transfer the
servicing on mortgage loans having an unpaid principal balance
of approximately $12.7 billion, or approximately 9% of the
total principal balance of loans ResCap services for them.
Fannie Mae has indicated that in return for these actions, they
will agree to forbear, until January 31, 2009, from
exercising contractual remedies otherwise available due to the
decline in consolidated tangible net worth, as defined. Actions
based on these remedies could have included, among other things,
reducing ResCaps ability to sell loans to them, reducing
its capacity to service loans for them, or requiring it to
transfer servicing of loans ResCap services for them. GMAC
management believes that selling the servicing related to the
loans described above will have an incremental positive impact
on ResCaps liquidity and overall cost of servicing, since
it will no longer be required to advance delinquent payments on
those loans. Meeting Fannie Maes collateral request will
have a negative impact on ResCaps liquidity. Moreover, if
Fannie Mae deems ResCaps consolidated tangible net worth,
as defined, to be inadequate following the expiration of the
forbearance period referred to above, and if Fannie Mae then
determines to exercise their contractual remedies as described
above, it would adversely affect GMACs profitability and
financial condition. There continues to be a risk that ResCap
will not be able to meet its debt service obligations, default
on its financial debt covenants due to insufficient capital
and/or be in
a negative liquidity position in 2008. Additionally,
ResCaps ability to participate in any governmental
investment program or the TARP, either directly or indirectly
through GMAC, is unknown at this time.
In light of ResCaps liquidity and capital needs, combined
with volatile conditions in the marketplace, there is
substantial doubt about ResCaps ability to continue as a
going concern. If unanticipated market factors emerge
and/or GMAC
no longer continues to support ResCaps capital or
liquidity needs, or ResCap is unable to successfully execute its
other initiatives, it would have a material adverse effect on
GMACs business, results of operations and financial
position.
131
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
GMACs
profitability and financial condition has been materially
adversely affected by declines in the residual value of
off-lease vehicles, and the residual value of off-lease vehicles
may continue to decrease.
|
GMACs expectation of the residual value of a vehicle
subject to an automotive lease contract is a critical element
used to determine the amount of the lease payments under the
contract at the time the customer enters into it. As a result,
to the extent the actual residual value of the vehicle, as
reflected in the sales proceeds received upon remarketing at
lease termination, is less than the expected residual value for
the vehicle at lease inception, GMAC incurs additional
depreciation expense
and/or a
loss on the lease transaction. General economic conditions, the
supply of off-lease vehicles and new vehicle market prices
heavily influence used vehicle prices and thus the actual
residual value of off-lease vehicles. Also contributing to the
weakness in the used vehicle market are the historically low
consumer confidence levels, which influence major purchases, and
the weakening financial condition of auto dealers. The recent
sharp decline in demand and used vehicle sale prices for
sport-utility vehicles and trucks in the United States and
Canada has affected GMACs remarketing proceeds for these
vehicles, and has resulted in impairments of $716 million
and $93 million during the three months ended June 30,
2008, and September 30, 2008, respectively. Weak residual
values also contributed to the loss provision of
$109 million and $240 million during the three months
ended June 30, 2008, and September 30, 2008,
respectively, on GMACs balloon finance contract portfolio.
These trends may continue or worsen. Our brand image, consumer
preference for our products, and our marketing programs that
influence the new and used vehicle market for our vehicles also
influence lease residual values. In addition, GMACs
ability to efficiently process and effectively market off-lease
vehicles impacts the disposal costs and proceeds realized from
the vehicle sales. While we provide support for lease residual
values, including through residual support programs, our support
does not in all cases entitle GMAC to full reimbursement for the
difference between the remarketing sales proceeds for off-lease
vehicles and the residual value specified in the lease contract.
Differences between the actual residual values realized on
leased vehicles and GMACs expectations of such values at
contract inception could continue to have a negative impact on
its profitability and financial condition.
|
|
|
General
business and economic conditions may significantly and adversely
affect GMACs revenues, profitability and financial
condition.
|
GMACs business and earnings are sensitive to general
business and economic conditions in the United States and in the
markets in which it operates outside the United States. A
downturn in economic conditions resulting in increased short-
and long-term interest rates, inflation, fluctuations in the
debt capital markets, unemployment rates, consumer and
commercial bankruptcy filings or a decline in the strength of
national and local economies and other factors that negatively
impact household incomes could decrease demand for its financing
and mortgage products and increase mortgage and financing
delinquency and losses on its customer and dealer financing
operations. GMAC has been negatively impacted due to
(i) the significant stress in the residential real estate
and related capital markets in 2007 and 2008, and, in
particular, the lack of home price appreciation in many markets
in which it lends and (ii) decreases in new and used
vehicle purchases, which have reduced the demand for automotive
retail and wholesale financing.
If the rate of inflation were to increase, or if the debt
capital markets or the economies of the United States or
GMACs markets outside the United States were to continue
in their current condition or further weaken, or if home prices
or new and used vehicle purchases continue at the currently
reduced levels or experience further declines, GMAC could
continue to be adversely affected, and it could become more
expensive for it to conduct its business. For example, business
and economic conditions that negatively impact household incomes
or housing prices could continue in their current condition or
further decrease (i) the demand for its mortgage loans and
new and used vehicle financing and (ii) the value of the
collateral underlying its portfolio of mortgage and new and used
vehicle loans held for investment and interests that continue to
be held by GMAC, and further increase the number of consumers
who become delinquent or default on their loans. In addition,
the rate of delinquencies, foreclosures, and losses on
GMACs loans (especially its nonprime mortgage loans) as
experienced recently could be higher during more severe economic
slowdowns.
Any sustained period of increased delinquencies, foreclosures,
or losses could further harm GMACs ability to sell its
mortgage and new and used vehicle loans, the prices it receives
for its mortgage and new and used vehicle loans, or the value of
its portfolio of mortgage and new and used vehicle loans held
for investment or interests from its securitizations, which
could harm its revenues, profitability and financial condition.
Continued adverse business and economic conditions could, and in
the
132
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
near term likely will, further impact demand for housing, new
and used vehicles, the cost of construction, and other related
factors that have harmed, and could continue to harm, the
revenues and profitability of its business capital operations.
In addition, GMACs business and earnings are significantly
affected by the fiscal and monetary policies of the
U.S. government and its agencies and similar governmental
authorities in the markets in which it operates outside the
United States. GMAC is particularly affected by the policies of
the Federal Reserve, which regulates the supply of money and
credit in the United States. The Federal Reserves policies
influence the new and used vehicle financing market and the size
of the mortgage origination market, which significantly impacts
the earnings of its businesses and the earnings of its business
capital activities. The Federal Reserves policies also
influence the yield on its interest-earning assets and the cost
of its interest bearing liabilities. Changes in those policies
are beyond GMACs control and difficult to predict, and
could adversely affect its revenues, profitability and financial
condition.
Risks
Related to GMACs Becoming a Bank Holding Company
|
|
|
GMACs
business, financial condition and results of operations could be
adversely affected by new regulations to which it may become
subject as a result of becoming a bank holding company, by new
regulations or by changes in other regulations or the
application thereof.
|
GMAC is currently in discussions with the Federal Reserve System
regarding becoming a bank holding company under the
U.S. Bank Holding Company Act of 1956. Any application may
not ultimately be approved. If GMAC submits a formal application
that is approved, it expects to be able to continue to engage in
most of the activities in which it currently engages. However,
it is possible that certain of GMACs existing activities
will not be deemed to be permissible under applicable
regulations if its application is successful. In addition, if
GMAC successfully converts into a bank holding company, it will
be subject to the comprehensive, consolidated supervision of the
Federal Reserve System, including risk-based and leverage
capital requirements and information reporting requirements.
This regulatory oversight is established to protect depositors,
federal deposit insurance funds and the banking system as a
whole, not security holders.
The financial services industry, in general, is heavily
regulated. Proposals for legislation further regulating the
financial services industry are continually being introduced in
the U.S. Congress and in state legislatures. The agencies
regulating the financial services industry also periodically
adopt changes to their regulations. In light of current
conditions in the U.S. financial markets and economy,
regulators have increased their focus on the regulation of the
financial services industry. For instance, in October 2008,
Congress passed the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of
2008, which in turn created the TARP and the CPP. GMAC is
unable to predict how these programs will be implemented or in
what form or whether any additional or similar changes to
statutes or regulations, including the interpretation or
implementation thereof, will occur in the future. Any such
action could affect GMAC in substantial and unpredictable ways
and could have an adverse effect on its business, financial
condition and results of operations.
GMAC is also affected by the policies adopted by regulatory
authorities and bodies of the U.S. and other governments.
For example, the actions of the Federal Reserve System and
international central banking authorities directly impact
GMACs cost of funds for lending, capital raising and
investment activities and may impact the value of financial
instruments it holds. In addition, such changes in monetary
policy may affect the credit quality of its customers. Changes
in domestic and international monetary policy are beyond
GMACs control and difficult to predict.
* * * * * *
133
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 6.
Exhibits
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit Name
|
|
10(a)
|
|
General Motors Executive Retirement Plan, As Amended August 4,
2008
|
10(b)
|
|
Amended and Restated Global Settlement Agreement Between Delphi
Corporation and General Motors Corporation, Dated September 12,
2008
|
10(c)
|
|
Amended and Restated Master Restructuring Agreement Between
Delphi Corporation and General Motors Corporation, Dated
September 12, 2008
|
23
|
|
Consent of Hamilton, Rabinovitz and Associates
|
31.a
|
|
Section 302 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer
|
31.b
|
|
Section 302 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer
|
32.a
|
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
32.b
|
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
* * * * * * * *
134
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION
(Registrant)
(Nick S. Cyprus, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
Date: November 10, 2008
135
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit Name
|
|
10(a)
|
|
General Motors Executive Retirement Plan, As Amended August 4,
2008
|
10(b)
|
|
Amended and Restated Global Settlement Agreement Between Delphi
Corporation and General Motors Corporation, Dated September 12,
2008
|
10(c)
|
|
Amended and Restated Master Restructuring Agreement Between
Delphi Corporation and General Motors Corporation, Dated
September 12, 2008
|
23
|
|
Consent of Hamilton, Rabinovitz and Associates
|
31.a
|
|
Section 302 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer
|
31.b
|
|
Section 302 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer
|
32.a
|
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
32.b
|
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
136