UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

Commission File No. 001-31552

Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code):

(800) 331-0852

      Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.     Yes þ          No o

      Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).     Yes o          No þ

      Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).     Yes o          No þ

      The registrant had 32,128,917 common shares, par value $0.001, outstanding at September 1, 2005.

SMITH & WESSON HOLDING CORPORATION

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q

For the Quarter Ended July 31, 2005

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I: FINANCIAL INFORMATION

SMITH & WESSON HOLDING CORPORATION and Subsidiaries

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

As of:

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

SMITH & WESSON HOLDING CORPORATION and Subsidiaries

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

AND OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(UNAUDITED)

For the Quarters Ended:

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

SMITH & WESSON HOLDING CORPORATION and Subsidiaries

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(UNAUDITED)

For the Quarter Ended July 31, 2005

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

SMITH & WESSON HOLDING CORPORATION and Subsidiaries

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(UNAUDITED)

For the Quarters Ended:

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

SMITH & WESSON HOLDING CORPORATION and Subsidiaries

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the Quarters Ended July 31, 2005 and 2004

      The consolidated balance sheet as of July 31, 2005, the consolidated statement of operations and other comprehensive income for the quarters ended July 31, 2005 and 2004, the consolidated statement of changes in stockholders’ equity for the quarter ended July 31, 2005, and the consolidated statement of cash flows for the quarters ended July 31, 2005 and 2004 have been prepared by us, without audit. In our opinion, all adjustments, which include only normal recurring adjustments necessary to fairly present the financial position, results of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows at July 31, 2005 and for the periods presented have been included. All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated. The balance sheet as of April 30, 2005 has been derived from our audited financial statements.

      Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States have been condensed or omitted. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in our company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K.

      We were incorporated on June 17, 1991 in the state of Nevada. We were a development stage company for a number of years.

      Effective October 20, 1998, we acquired the assets of Saf-T-Hammer, Inc. and changed our name to Saf-T-Hammer Corporation. The acquisition was accounted for under the purchase method. We issued 1,331,250 shares of common stock in the Saf-T-Hammer acquisition, which resulted in a total of 1,864,038 shares of common stock being issued and outstanding.

      Smith & Wesson Corp. was incorporated under the laws of the state of Delaware on January 13, 1987. Smith & Wesson Corp. and its predecessors have been in business since 1852. Since its formation, Smith & Wesson Corp. has undergone several ownership changes. On June 9, 1987, Tomkins Corporation (“Tomkins”), a company organized under the laws of the state of Delaware that is a subsidiary of U.K.-based Tomkins PLC, acquired Smith & Wesson Corp. from Lear Siegler.

      On May 11, 2001, we purchased all of the outstanding stock of Smith & Wesson Corp. from Tomkins for $15,000,000. At a special meeting of stockholders held on February 14, 2002, our stockholders approved a change of our company’s name to Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation.

      Pursuant to a Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of May 11, 2001 between Tomkins and us, we acquired all of the issued and outstanding stock of Smith & Wesson Corp. As a result of the acquisition, Smith & Wesson Corp. became our wholly owned subsidiary. We paid $15,000,000 in exchange for all of the issued and outstanding shares of Smith & Wesson Corp. as follows:

SMITH & WESSON HOLDING CORPORATION and Subsidiaries

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

      In January 2005, we completed the refinancing of our existing debt utilizing our receivables, inventory and property, plant and equipment as collateral. The financing was obtained through BankNorth, with which we had previous loans. As a result of our refinancing, we were able to repay the Tomkins Note, which had an interest rate of 9% per year and restrictive covenants, along with the previously existing loans with BankNorth. We used the cash that was collateralizing our existing line of credit with BankNorth toward the repayment of the Tomkins Note.

      The new credit facility consists of the following:

SMITH & WESSON HOLDING CORPORATION and Subsidiaries

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

      A summary, stated at lower of first in, first out cost or market, is as follows:

      We expense advertising costs, consisting primarily of magazine advertisements and printed materials, as incurred. For the quarters ended July 31, 2005 and 2004, advertising expense amounted to approximately $1,772,000 and $1,136,000, respectively.

      We generally provide a lifetime warranty to the “original” purchaser of our firearms products. We provide for estimated warranty obligations for in the period in which we recognize the related revenue. We quantify and record an estimate for warranty related costs based on our actual historical claims experience and current repair costs. We make adjustments to accruals as warranty claim data and historical experience warrant. Should we experience actual claims and repair costs that are higher than the estimated claims and repair costs used to calculate the provision, our operating results for the period or periods in which such returns or additional costs materialize would be adversely impacted. Warranty expense for the quarters ended July 31, 2005 and 2004 amounted to $153,396 and $310,071, respectively.

      The change in accrued warranties for the quarters ended July 31, 2005 and the fiscal year ended April 30, 2005 was as follows:

      As of July 31, 2005 and April 30, 2005, we had reserves for workers’ compensation, product liability and medical/dental costs totaling $10,437,743 and $10,658,339, respectively, of which $6,528,351 and $6,723,637, respectively, have been classified as non-current and included in other non-current liabilities and the remaining amounts of $3,909,392 and $3,934,692, respectively, have been included in accrued other expenses on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. While we believe these reserves to be adequate, there exists a possibility that the ultimate liabilities will exceed such estimates. Amounts charged were $1,292,022 and $936,900 for the quarters ended July 31, 2005 and 2004.

      It is our policy to provide an estimate for loss as a result of expected adverse findings or legal settlements when we believe such losses are probable and are reasonably estimable. It is also our policy to accrue for

SMITH & WESSON HOLDING CORPORATION and Subsidiaries

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

reasonable estimable legal costs associated with defending such litigation. While such estimates involve a range of possible costs, we determine, in consultation with litigation counsel, the most likely cost within such range on a case-by-case basis. At July 31, 2005 and April 30, 2005, we had product liability reserves of approximately $7.8 million and $8.0 million, respectively, consisting entirely of expected legal defense costs. In addition, we had recorded receivables from insurance carriers related to these liabilities of $5.1 million and $5.4 million, of which, $3.9 million and $4.2 million, respectively, have been classified as other assets and the remaining amounts of $1.2 million and $1.2 million, respectively, have been classified as other current assets.

      We, together with other firearms manufacturers and certain related organizations, are a co-defendant in various legal proceedings involving product liability claims and are aware of other product liability claims, including allegations of defective product design, manufacturing, negligent marketing and/or distribution of firearms leading to personal injury, including wrongful death. The lawsuits and claims are based principally on the theory of “strict liability,” but also may be based on negligence, breach of warranty, and other legal theories. In many of the lawsuits, punitive damages, as well as compensatory damages, are demanded. Aggregate claimed amounts currently exceed product liability accruals and, if applicable, insurance coverage. We believe that, in every case, the allegations of defective product design are unfounded, and that the accident and any results from them were due to negligence or misuse of the firearm by the claimant or a third party and that there should be no recovery against us.

      In addition, we are a co-defendant in various legal proceedings brought by certain cities, municipalities, and counties against numerous firearms manufacturers, distributors, and dealers seeking to recover damages allegedly arising out of the misuse of firearms by third parties in shootings. The complaints by municipalities seek damages, among other things, for the costs of medical care, police and emergency services, public health services, and the maintenance of courts, prisons, and other services. In certain instances, the plaintiffs seek to recover for decreases in property values and loss of business within the city due to increased criminal violence. In addition, nuisance abatement and/or injunctive relief is sought to change the design, manufacture, marketing, and distribution practices of the various defendants. These suits allege, among other claims, strict liability or negligence in the design of products, public nuisance, negligent entrustment, negligent distribution, deceptive or fraudulent advertising, violation of consumer protection statutes, and conspiracy or concert of action theories.

      We monitor the status of known claims and the product liability accrual, which includes amounts for defense costs for asserted and unasserted claims. While it is difficult to forecast the outcome of these claims, we believe, after consultation with litigation counsel, that it is uncertain whether the outcome of these claims will have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. We believe that we have provided adequate reserves for defense costs. We do not anticipate material adverse judgments and intend to vigorously defend ourselves.

      At this time, the estimated range of reasonably possible additional losses, as that term is defined in SFAS No. 5, is zero. A range of reasonably possible losses relating to unfavorable outcomes cannot be made. However, in the product liability cases in which a dollar amount of damages is claimed, the amount of damages claimed, which totaled approximately $739,000 at July 31, 2005, are set forth as an indication of possible maximum liability that we might be required to incur in these cases (regardless of the likelihood or reasonable probability of any or all of this amount being awarded to claimants) as a result of adverse judgments that are sustained on appeal.

SMITH & WESSON HOLDING CORPORATION and Subsidiaries

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

      In the quarter ended July 31, 2005, we incurred no defense costs, net of amounts receivable from insurance carriers, relative to product liability and municipal litigation. During this period, we paid no settlement fees relative to product liability cases.

      We have recorded the liability for defense costs at a level before reimbursement from insurance carriers. We have also recorded the amount due as reimbursement under existing policies from the insurance carriers as a receivable shown in Other Current Assets and Other Assets.

      The SEC is conducting an investigation to determine whether there have been violations of the federal securities laws in connection with matters relating to the restatement of our consolidated financial statements for fiscal 2002 and the first three quarters of fiscal 2003. We continue to be in discussions with the SEC and intend to continue to cooperate fully with the SEC.

      We are subject to numerous federal, state, and local laws that regulate the discharge of materials into, or otherwise relate to the protection of, the environment. These laws have required, and are expected to continue to require, us to make significant expenditures of both a capital and expense nature. Several of the more significant federal laws applicable to our operations include the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (“CERCLA”) and the Solid Waste Disposal Act, as amended by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (“RCRA”).

      We have in place programs and personnel that monitor compliance with various federal, state, and local environmental regulations. In the normal course of our manufacturing operations, we are subject to occasional governmental proceedings and orders pertaining to waste disposal, air emissions and water discharges into the environment. We fund our environmental costs through cash flows from operating revenue and expect to do so in the future. We believe that we are in compliance with applicable environmental regulations in all material respects.

      We are required to remediate hazardous waste at our facilities. Currently, we own designated sites in Springfield, Massachusetts and are subject to five release areas that are the focus of remediation projects as part of the Massachusetts Contingency Plan, or MCP. Three of these sites are contained on property sold to the Springfield Redevelopment Authority or SRA. The MCP provides a structured environment for the voluntary remediation of regulated releases. We may be required to remove hazardous waste or remediate the alleged effects of hazardous substances on the environment associated with past disposal practices at sites not owned by us. We have received notice that we are a potentially responsible party from the Environmental Protection Agency, or EPA, and/or individual states under CERCLA or a state equivalent at one site.

      We have reserves of approximately $643,000 ($590,000 as non-current) for remediation of the remaining sites. The time frame for payment of such remediation for the remaining sites is currently indeterminable thus precluding any present value calculation. Our estimates of these costs are based upon presently enacted laws and regulations, currently available facts, experience in remediation efforts, existing technology, and the ability of other potentially responsible parties or contractually liable parties to pay the allocated portions of any environmental obligations. When the available information is sufficient to estimate the amount of liability, that estimate has been used; when the information is only sufficient to establish a range of probable liability and no point within the range is more likely than any other, the lower end of the range has been used. We do not have insurance coverage for our environmental remediation costs. We have not recognized any gains from

SMITH & WESSON HOLDING CORPORATION and Subsidiaries

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

probable recoveries or other gain contingencies. The environmental reserve was calculated using undiscounted amounts based on independent environmental remediation reports obtained.

      On February 25, 2003, we sold approximately 85 acres of company-owned property in the city of Springfield, Massachusetts to the SRA for $1.75 million, resulting in a net gain of $1.7 million. The terms of the sale included a cash payment of $750,000 at the closing and a promissory note for the remaining $1.0 million. The note is collateralized by a mortgage on the sold property. This note is due in 2022 and accrues interest at a fixed rate of 6.0% per annum.

      This property is excess land adjacent to our manufacturing and office facility. The 85 acres includes three of our five previously disclosed release areas that have identified soil and groundwater contamination under the MCP, specifically the South Field, West Field, and Fire Pond. This property was acquired by SRA as a defined “Brownfield” under the CERCLA. We believe that the SRA plans to create a light industrial and other commercial use development park on the property. SRA, with the support of the city of Springfield, has received governmental “Brownfield” grants or loans to facilitate the remediation and development of the property. The remediation of the property was completed during the quarter ended July 31, 2005. Consequently, we have reduced the reserve related to the property. This adjustment totaled approximately $3.1 million and is included as a reduction of operating expenses for the quarter.

      Based on information known to us, we do not expect current environmental regulations or environmental proceedings and claims to have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. However, it is not possible to predict with certainty the impact on us of future environmental compliance requirements or of the cost of resolution of future environmental proceedings and claims, in part because the scope of the remedies that may be required is not certain, liability under federal environmental laws is joint and several in nature, and environmental laws and regulations are subject to modification and changes in interpretation. There can be no assurance that additional or changing environmental regulation will not become more burdensome in the future and that any such development would not have a material adverse effect on us.

      Employment Agreements — We have entered into employment agreements with certain officers and managers to retain their services in the ordinary course of business.

      Other Agreements — We have distribution agreements with third parties in the ordinary course of business.

SMITH & WESSON HOLDING CORPORATION and Subsidiaries

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

      Net periodic post-retirement benefit expense (income) for the quarters ended July 31, 2005 and 2004 is as follows:

      Our expected contributions for the current fiscal year are approximately $49,000.

      The impact of The Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement Modernization Act of 2003 was not reflected as of July 31, 2005 as the plan has an immaterial amount of post-65 drug benefits, and likely would not qualify for the federal subsidy.

      During the quarters ended July 31, 2005 and 2004, options or warrants were exercised as follows:

      The following table provides a reconciliation of the income amounts and shares used to determine basic and diluted earnings per share for the quarters ended July 31, 2005 and 2004.

      Options to purchase shares of our common stock 675,000 and 225,000 were excluded in the quarters ended July 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, as the effect would be antidilutive.

SMITH & WESSON HOLDING CORPORATION and Subsidiaries

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Stock Warrants

      In fiscal 2002, we issued warrants related to the financing of debt used for the acquisition of Smith & Wesson Corp., as incentive bonuses to employees and directors, and as compensation to outside consultants.

      In consideration for past services to our company, including services rendered in connection with the acquisition of Smith & Wesson Corp., we issued a common stock purchase warrant, dated May 11, 2001 (approved by the Board of Directors on April 30, 2001) to Mitchell Saltz, formerly Chief Executive Officer and currently a director of our company (the “Saltz Warrant”). The Saltz Warrant, which contained a cashless exercise provision, entitles Mr. Saltz to purchase up to 5,000,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.89 per share, subject to adjustment as set forth therein, at any time from the date of issuance until five years from the date of issuance. We relied upon Section 4(2) of the Securities Act with respect to the issuance of the Saltz Warrant and the underlying shares.

      In consideration for past services to our company, including services rendered in connection with the acquisition of Smith & Wesson Corp., we issued a common stock purchase warrant, dated May 11, 2001 (approved by the Board of Directors on April 30, 2001) to Robert L. Scott, a former officer and current director of our company (the “Scott Warrant”). The Scott Warrant, which contained a cashless exercise provision, entitles Mr. Scott to purchase up to 5,000,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $.89 per share, subject to adjustment as set forth therein, at any time from the date of issuance until five years from the date of issuance. We relied upon Section 4(2) of the Securities Act with respect to the issuance of the Scott Warrant and the underlying shares.

      During May 2005, modifications to the Saltz and Scott Warrants were made, the most significant of which was the elimination of the net issuance rights (cashless exercise). The effect of these modifications were determined not to cause incremental compensation cost.

      The following outlines the activity related to the warrants for the periods indicated:

      We have two Employee Stock Option Plans (“the SOPs”): the 2001 Stock Option Plan and the 2004 Incentive Compensation Plan. New grants were not made under the 2001 Stock Option Plan following the approval of the 2004 Incentive Compensation Plan at our September 13, 2004 annual meeting of stockholders.

SMITH & WESSON HOLDING CORPORATION and Subsidiaries

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

All new grants covering all participants will be issued under the 2004 Incentive Compensation Plan. The 2004 Incentive Compensation Plan authorizes the issuance of the lesser of (1) 15% of the shares of our common stock outstanding from time to time or (2) 10,000,000 shares of our common stock, and is available for issuance pursuant to options granted to acquire common stock, the direct granting of restricted common stock and deferred stock, the granting of stock appreciation rights, and the granting of dividend equivalents. The Board of Directors or a committee established by the board administers the SOPs, selects recipients to whom options are granted, and determines the number of grants to be awarded. Options granted under the SOPs are exercisable at a price determined by the board or committee at the time of grant, but in no event less than fair market value. Grants of options may be made to employees and directors without regard to any performance measures. All options issued pursuant to the SOPs are nontransferable and subject to forfeiture. Unless terminated earlier by the Board of Directors, the 2004 Incentive Compensation Plan will terminate at such time as no shares of common stock remain available for issuance under the plan and our company has no further rights or obligations with respect to outstanding awards under the plan. Unless otherwise specified by the Board of Directors or board committee in the resolution authorizing such option, the date of grant of an option is deemed to be the date upon which the Board of Directors or board committee authorizes the granting of such option. Generally, options vest over a period of three years. During the quarters ended July 31, 2005 and 2004, we granted 670,000 options and 125,000 options, respectively. The number and weighted average exercise prices of options granted under the SOPs and separate grant for the quarters ended July 31, 2005 and 2004 were as follows:

      A summary of stock options outstanding and exercisable at July 31, 2005 follows:

      We have an Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“the ESPP”), which authorizes the sale of up to 10,000,000 shares of our common stock to employees. The ESPP commenced on June 24, 2002 and continues in effect for a term of 10 years unless sooner terminated. The ESPP was implemented by a series of offering

SMITH & WESSON HOLDING CORPORATION and Subsidiaries

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

periods of two years duration, with four six-month purchase periods in the offering period. The plan was amended in September 2004 such that future offering periods, commencing with the October 1, 2004 offering period, will be six months consistent with the six-month purchase period. The purchase price will be 85% of the fair market value of our common stock on the offering date or on the purchase date, whichever is lower. A participant may elect to have payroll deductions made on each payday during the offering period in an amount not less than 1% and not more than 20% (or such greater percentage as the board may establish from time to time before an offering date) of such participant’s compensation on each payday during the offering period. The last day of each offering period will be the purchase date for such offering period. An offering period commencing on April 1 ends on the next September 30. An offering period commencing on October 1 ends on the next March 31. The Board of Directors has the power to change the duration and/or the frequency of offering and purchase periods with respect to future offerings and purchases without stockholder approval if such change is announced at least five days prior to the scheduled beginning of the first offering period to be affected. The maximum number of shares an employee may purchase during each purchase period is 12,500 shares. All options and rights to participate in the ESPP are nontransferable and subject to forfeiture in accordance with the ESPP guidelines. In the event of certain corporate transactions, each option outstanding under the ESPP will be assumed or an equivalent option will be substituted by the successor corporation or a parent or subsidiary of such successor corporation. During the quarters ended July 31, 2005 and 2004, no shares were purchased under the ESPP.

      Under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), a fair value for our stock options and warrants is calculated using the Black Scholes method at the time the options and warrants are granted. That amount is then amortized over the vesting period of the option and warrant. With ESPP, a fair value is determined at the beginning of the purchase period and amortized over the term of the offering period. The following assumptions were used in valuing our options, warrants and ESPP:

      We estimate expected volatility using past historical volatility for the expected term. The fair value of each stock option or ESPP purchase was estimated on the date of the grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The weighted-average fair value of stock options granted during the quarter ended July 2005 and 2004 was $3.49 and $1.17, respectively. The weighted-average fair value of ESPP shares granted the quarter ended July 2005 and 2004 was $0.80 and $0.84, respectively.

SMITH & WESSON HOLDING CORPORATION and Subsidiaries

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

      During our fiscal 2005 year-end closing process, we determined that compensation cost for certain warrants issued to two former employees in May 2001, which included a cashless exercise feature, was not adjusted in subsequent periods through 2005 for increases or decreases in the quoted market value of our stock. In addition, in fiscal 2004 and 2005, we did not record compensation cost resulting from the modification of certain vested stock options for terminating employees. The pre-tax impact for the quarter ended July 31, 2004 on the statement of operations for these transactions under APB 25 was to decrease previously reported general and administrative expense by $1,400,000. The impact of the restatement under ABP 25 is disclosed below.

      During our fiscal 2005 year-end closing process, we also elected to early adopt Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment (Revised 2004)” (SFAS 123(R)), utilizing the modified retrospective application method for all periods for which Statement 123 was effective. The impact of the adoption of SFAS 123(R) on the quarter ended July 31, 2004 on operating expenses, income before income taxes, income tax expense, net income, cash flow from operations, cash flow from financing activities, and basic and fully diluted earnings per share is disclosed below.

      On August 9, 2005, our Board of Directors adopted a stockholder rights plan (the “Rights Plan”). Under the Rights Plan, we will make a dividend distribution of one preferred share purchase right (a “Right”) for each outstanding share of our common stock, par value $.001 per share (the “Common Stock”). The dividend

SMITH & WESSON HOLDING CORPORATION and Subsidiaries

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

is payable to stockholders of record at the close of business on August 26, 2005 (the “Record Date”). Each Right entitles the registered holder to purchase from us one one-thousandth of a share of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock, par value $.001 per share, at a price of $36.00 per one one-thousandth of a share of Preferred Stock (the “Purchase Price”), subject to adjustment. The description and terms of the Rights are set forth in a Rights Agreement dated as of August 25, 2005. Refer to our Form 8-K filed on August 26, 2005.

      On September 12, 2005, we completed the sale of an aggregate of 6,000,000 shares of our common stock (the “Shares”) and warrants to purchase an additional 1,200,000 shares of our common stock (the “Warrants”) at $5.33 per share. We received an aggregate of $26,160,000 in cash for the sale of the Shares. The proceeds from the private placement will be used to repurchase approximately 9,000,000 warrants to purchase our common stock held by Mitchell A. Saltz and Robert L. Scott, who are directors of our company, and for general working capital. We also entered into an agreement with Messrs. Saltz, Scott, and Colton R. Melby, another director of our company, pursuant to which Messrs. Saltz, Scott, and Melby have agreed to sell to us an aggregate of 1,200,000 shares of our common stock if requested by us, at a price per share of $5.33, in the event the warrants are exercised. Refer to our Form 8-K filed on September 13, 2005.

Overview

      Please refer to the Overview found in the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended April 30, 2005. This Overview sets forth key management objectives and key performance indicators used by us as well as key industry data tracked by us.

First Quarter Fiscal 2006 Highlights

      Net income for the quarter of $2,687,263 was $1,220,264, or 83.2% higher than net income of $1,466,999 for the quarter ended July 31, 2004. Net product sales were $31.8 million, which was $4.0 million higher than sales of $27.8 million for the quarter ended July 31, 2004. Firearms sales, our core business, increased for the quarter by $4.0 million, or 15.9%, compared with the quarter ended July 31, 2004.

      In February 2003, we sold 85 acres of excess land to the city of Springfield. As part of the terms of the agreement, the City agreed to remediate certain environmental issues on the property. We had reserves of approximately $3.1 million for remediation of this parcel of land. Because of concerns about potential liability if the city failed to remediate the property, we did not release the reserves at the time of sale and decided to wait until remediation was completed. In July 2005, we received notification from the city that the remediation process has been completed. Consequently, we have released the related reserves in the quarter ended July 31, 2005.

      In August 2003, we decided to amend various reports previously filed with the SEC to modify certain accounting matters related to our acquisition of Smith & Wesson Corp. We decided to restate our Form 10-KSB Report for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2002 as well as our Form 10-QSB Reports for the quarters ended July 31, 2001 and 2002, October 31, 2001 and 2002, and January 31, 2002 and 2003. The Form 10-KSB Report for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2003 was filed in December 2003 and included restated financial statements for fiscal 2002. The amended Form 10-QSB Reports for the July and October quarters were filed in January 2004, and the amended Form 10-QSB Reports for the January quarters were filed in March 2004. The SEC is conducting an informal investigation regarding the circumstances surrounding the restatement. We are cooperating fully with the SEC in this investigation. The investigation is still ongoing.

      In June 2005, we determined that our previously reported financial statements for 2002, 2003, 2004 and the first three quarters of 2005 required restatement to increase compensation expense for certain employee stock awards. We issued warrants to two former employees in May 2001 containing a cashless exercise feature, and, as a result, compensation expense should have been adjusted in subsequent periods through April 30, 2005 for increases or decreases in the quoted value of our stock. In addition, in fiscal 2004 and 2005, we should have recorded compensation expense resulting from the modification of certain vested stock options for terminating employees. For the year ended April 30, 2005, we decided to adopt Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment, (Revised 2004), (SFAS 123(R)), using the modified retrospective application method. We filed Form 8-K on July 1, 2005 describing the need to restate our previously issued financial statements to correct compensation expense and our decision to adopt FAS 123(R). The financial statements included in this Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2004 have been restated to correct compensation expense and to adopt SFAS 123(R). The effect of this restatement is described in Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Results of Operations

      The following table sets forth certain information relative to net product sales for the quarters ended July 31, 2005 and 2004:

      We recorded net product sales of $31,849,723 for the first quarter of fiscal 2005, an increase of $4,080,848, or 14.7%, over the quarter ended July 31, 2004. Firearms sales increased by $4,028,861, or 15.9%, over the comparable period last year. Non-firearm sales for the quarter ended July 31, 2005 increased by $51,987, or 2.1%, compared with the quarter ended July 31, 2004 as a result of higher handcuff sales.

      Revolver sales increased by $293,043, or 2.3%, for the quarter ended July 31, 2005 to $13,263,389. We commenced shipments of the Model 460 revolver in July. This model has generated a great deal of interest, and we had a backlog of over 6,600 units at July 31, 2005. The revolver order backlog was at $8,973,700 at July 31, 2005.

      Pistol sales of $9,450,149 were $3,841,622, or 68.5%, higher for the quarter ended July 31, 2005. The increase in pistol sales was primarily attributable to the continued demand for our Sigma VE pistols. Pistol unit sales increased by approximately 15,700 units to 35,400 units, an increase of 80.1%. The Sigma VE pistols accounted for 54.6% of total pistol sales compared with 37.9% for the quarter ended July 31, 2004. The pistol order backlog was at $2,447,084 at July 31, 2005.

      We are the exclusive U.S. distributor of Walther firearms. Walther firearms sales declined by $485,628 as a result of lower sales of the P22 and P99 pistols. The Walther order backlog was at $1,324,527 at July 31, 2005.

      Performance Center sales decreased by $596,578, or 26.6%, for the quarter ended July 31, 2005 to $1,647,489, compared with the comparable quarter last year. Delays in the introduction of the Model 460 variations were responsible for the decrease in sales. The Performance Center had an order backlog of $1,868,548 at July 31, 2005.

      Non-firearms sales increased by $51,978, or 2.1%, in the quarter ended July 31, 2005 as a result of higher handcuff sales, partially offset by lower Specialty Services revenue. The higher handcuff volume was a result of increased international demand. The lower Specialty Services resulted from our decision to focus more on the firearms business.

      The following table sets forth certain information relative to licensing revenue for the quarters ended July 31, 2005 and 2004:

      Licensing revenue for the quarter ended July 31, 2005 increased by $403,224, or 101.6%, over the comparable quarter in the previous year. An audit of an existing licensee revealed an underpayment in royalties for prior years totaling $350,000, which the licensee has agreed to pay. In addition, a contract extension with another licensee yielded an advance payment of $100,000.

      The following table sets forth certain information regarding cost of products, services sales, and licensing revenue and gross profit for the quarters ended July 31, 2005 and 2004:

      Gross profit for the quarter ended July 31, 2005 increased by $234,489, or 2.5%, over the quarter ended July 31, 2004. The increase in gross profit was attributable to the increased sales volume and improvements in efficiency. Cost of goods and services for the quarter ended July 31, 2004 included approximately $506,000 of favorable adjustments to the product liability and municipal reserves. Excluding these adjustments, gross profit as a percentage of net product and services sales and licensing revenue would have been 29.4% compared with 31.5% as report for the quarter ended July 31, 2004.

      Cost of goods and services for the quarter ended July 31, 2005 included an additional $333,000 in depreciation expense compared with the quarter ended July 31, 2004. In addition, gross profit was adversely impacted by discounts granted during the quarter as part of several sales promotions.

      The following table sets forth certain information regarding operating expenses for the quarters ended July 31, 2005 and 2004:

      Operating expenses for the quarter ended July 31, 2005 decreased by $1,793,895, or 27.3%, over the quarter ended July 31, 2004. The operating expenses for the quarter ended July 31, 2005 included a reduction in our environmental reserves of $3,087,810. Sales and marketing expenses were $1,089,027 higher for the quarter ended July 31, 2005 as compared to the quarter ended July 31, 2004. The increase in expenses

included $312,464 in additional salaries and fringes resulting from additional hires in sales and marketing, $593,167 in spending related to our NASCAR promotions, and $120,797 in expenses relative to the planned launch of our new pistol. General and administrative expenses for the quarter ended July 31, 2005 included an additional $250,000 in audit fees relative to the adoption of SFAS 123(R). Stock option expense for the quarter was $275,500 compared with $90,721 for the quarter ended July 31, 2004. Operating expenses as a percentage of net product and services sales and licensing revenue declined by 8.7%, to 14.6% for the quarter ended July 31, 2005, as a result of the reduction in our environmental reserve. Excluding this adjustment, operating expenses as a percentage of net product and services sales and licensing revenue would have been 24.1%.

      The following table sets forth certain information regarding operating income for the quarters ended July 31, 2005 and 2004:

      Operating income was $4,816,741 for the quarter ended July 31, 2005, a $2,028,384 or 72.7% increase, compared with operating income of $2,788,357 for the quarter ended July 31, 2004.

      Other income totaled $42,891 for the quarter ended July 31, 2005 compared with $314,993 for the quarter ended July 31, 2004. The other income in the quarter ended July 31, 2004 included a gain of $450,515 from the sale of our Identi-Kit business. This was partially offset by foreign exchange losses of $83,549.

      Interest income of $18,504 for the quarter ended July 31, 2005 represented a decline of $63,746 versus $82,250 for the quarter ended July 31, 2004 as a result of reduced cash available for investment.

      The following table sets forth certain information regarding interest expense for the quarters ended July 31, 2005 and 2004:

      Interest expense declined for quarter ended July 31, 2005 by $286,040 as a result of the refinancing that was completed in January 2005. Total debt outstanding as of July 31, 2005 was $19,726,837 compared with $40,929,480 on July 31, 2004.

      Income tax expense of $1,641,536 for the quarter ended July 31, 2005 is an increase of $758,312 compared with the income tax expense of $883,224 for the comparable quarter in fiscal 2004. The first quarter tax expense is being accrued at an effective rate of 37.92%, compared with 37.58% for the quarter ended July 31, 2004. This increase in the effective rate is primarily attributable to an increase in certain nondeductibale expenses.

      The American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (“AJCA”) provides a deduction for income from qualified domestic production activities (“QPA”), which is being phased in from 2005 through 2010. The QPA deduction is available to us in fiscal year 2006. As we have net operating loss carryforwards available, further analysis is required in order to determine the timing and impact of the QPA to our financial statements. Therefore we did not record any tax benefit related to QPA for the quarter ended July 31, 2005.

      The following table sets forth certain information regarding net income and the related per share data for the quarters ended July 31, 2005 and 2004:

      The increase in net income and net income per share for the quarter ended July 31, 2005 compared with the comparable quarter in fiscal 2004 resulted primarily from the release of the environmental reserve. Net income excluding the environmental reserve release was approximately $767,000 or $0.02 per share. Net income for the quarter ended July 31, 2004 included approximately $506,000 in product liability reserve adjustments and $450,000 form the sale of the Identi-Kit business.

      Our principal cash requirements are to finance the growth of our firearms and licensing operations and to service our existing debt. Capital expenditures for new products, capacity expansion, and process improvements represent important cash needs.

      In January 2005, we completed the refinancing of our existing debt utilizing our receivables, inventory, property, plant and equipment as collateral. The financing was obtained through BankNorth, which had a previous loan with us. As a result of our refinancing, we were able to repay the Tomkins note, which had a high interest cost and restrictive loan covenants. We used the cash that was collateralizing our existing line of credit with BankNorth, along with a seven-year $12.1 term loan and a ten-year $5.9 million term note, to repay the Tomkins note and the outstanding BankNorth loans. In addition, we have a $17,000,000 revolving line of credit to support letters of credit and working capital needs as well as a $5,000,000 line of credit available in fiscal 2006 to support capital expenditures. While we believe that our internal cash generation will support our capital spending requirements in fiscal 2006, the timing and size of the expenditures may require us to utilize this line of credit for a portion of the fiscal year.

      The following table sets forth certain information relative to cash flows for the quarters ended July 31, 2005 and 2004:

      Operating activities represent the principal source of our cash flow. The increase in the operating cash outflow versus the previous year’s quarter was primarily a result of a planned increase in inventory. Our production plan is level loaded, so we plan an increase in inventory to meet the demand in the traditionally stronger second and fourth quarters. In addition, our finished goods levels had declined to a level that was below what we believe is necessary to properly serve our customer base.

      Cash used for investing activities increased by $3,447,598 for the quarter ended July 31, 2005 compared with the quarter ended July 31, 2004. The increase was due to higher capital spending year over year and the maturity of marketable securities in the previous year. Capital spending totaled $2,299,620 for the quarter ended July 31, 2005, an increase of $1,607,248 over the comparable quarter last year. We have reviewed our capital requirements for fiscal 2006 and expect to spend approximately $12.0 million on capital expenditures.

The major capital expenditures will focus on new products, increasing production capacity to meet the higher demand, and various projects designed to increase throughput and upgrade manufacturing technology.

      The $3,366,550 increase in cash provided by financing activities for the quarter ended July 31, 2005 resulted from short-term bank borrowings totaling $2,500,000 and higher proceeds from the exercise of stock options and warrants.

      As of July 31, 2005, we had $1,231,986 in cash and cash equivalents on hand. We have a $22 million credit facility with BankNorth to support working capital needs, as well as capital expenditures.

Other Matters

      The preparation of financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant accounting policies are disclosed in Note 3 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended April 30, 2005. The most significant areas involving judgments and estimates are described in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended April 30, 2005, to which there have been no material changes. Actual results could differ form those estimates.

      In November 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 151, “Inventory Costs, an amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4” (FAS 151). FAS 151 clarifies the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs and wasted material. Additionally, FAS 151 requires that allocation of fixed production overhead to inventory be based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. The provisions of FAS 151 are applicable to inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. The adoption of this statement is not expected to have a material effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

      In December 2004, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, “Share-Based Payment” (revised 2004)(FAS 123(R)). We have adopted SFAS 123(R) using the modified retrospective application method, which resulted in the restatement of prior years (see Note 12).

      In December 2004, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 153, “Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets, an amendment to APB Opinion No. 29” (FAS 153). The statement eliminates the exception to measure exchanges at fair value for exchanges of similar productive assets and replaces it with a general exception for exchange transactions that do not have commercial substance. FAS 153 is effective for nonmonetary exchanges in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005. The adoption of this statement is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

      In March 2005, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 47, “Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 143” (FIN 47). This interpretation clarifies the timing of liability recognition for legal obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets when the timing and/or method of settlement of the obligation are conditional on a future event and where an entity would have sufficient information to reasonably estimate the fair value of an asset retirement obligation. FIN 47 is effective for conditional asset retirement obligations occurring during fiscal years ending after December 15, 2005. The adoption of this interpretation is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

      We do not enter into any market risk sensitive instruments for trading purposes. Our principal market risk relates to changes in the value of the Euro relative to the U.S. Dollar. A portion of our gross revenues during the quarter ended July 31, 2005 ($3.4 million, representing approximately 10.5% of aggregate gross revenues) came from the sale of goods that were purchased, wholly or partially from a European manufacturer, in Euros. Annually, we purchase approximately $10 million of inventory from a European supplier. This exposes us to risk from foreign exchange rate fluctuations. A 10% drop in the value of the U.S. Dollar in relation to the Euro would, to the extent not covered through price adjustments, reduce our gross profit on that $10 million of inventory by approximately $1 million. In an effort to offset our risks from unfavorable foreign exchange fluctuations, we entered into Euro participating forward options to purchase Euros used to pay the European manufacturer. As of July 31, 2005 we had three 750,000 euros option contracts remaining, with the last expiring in October 2005.

      Participating forward options provide full protection against the depreciation and partial benefit from the appreciation of the currency pair. If the Euro strengthens above the average rate, we will not pay more than the average rate. If the Euro weakens below the average rate, 50% of the Euros are at the average rate and the remaining 50% of the Euros are paid for at the spot rate. Each option, unless used on the expiration date, will be converted to a forward contract, due when needed during the month at a slight up charge in rate. During the three months ended July 31, 2005, we experienced a net loss of $126,338 on hedging transactions that we executed during the period in an effort to limit our exposure to fluctuations in the Euro/ Dollar exchange rate. As of July 31, 2005, we had forward participating options totaling 2.25 million Euros remaining which were reported as a liability of $136,244.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

      We have carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our “disclosure controls and procedures.” As defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act, disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. We formed a disclosure committee in the fall of 2002 that includes senior financial, operational, and legal personnel charged with assisting the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer in overseeing the accuracy and timeliness of the periodic reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act and in evaluating regularly our disclosure controls and procedures.

      Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the evaluation end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in that they were reasonably designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC. It should be noted that any system of controls, however well designed and operated, is based in part upon certain assumptions and can provide only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the system are met. There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or are reasonably likely to affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

      During the quarter ended July 31, 2005, we enhanced our controls in response to the material weakness disclosed in our Form 10-K for the year end April 30, 2005.

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

      The following describes material updates to previously reported cases since the filing of our Form 10-K for the year ended April 30, 2005; and our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2005.

NEW CASES

      No new cases of a material nature were filed against us since the filing of our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2005. The following describes material updates to cases previously reported by us.

CASES ON APPEAL

      The ruling in the following case is still subject to certain pending appeals.

      District of Columbia, et al.v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp., et al., in the Superior Court for the District of Columbia. The District of Columbia and nine individual plaintiffs seek an unspecified amount of compensatory and exemplary damages and certain injunctive relief. On December 16, 2002, the Superior Court for the District of Columbia granted defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings in its entirety. On January 14, 2003, plaintiffs filed their notice of appeal to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals. The court of appeals issued its decision, which affirmed the dismissal of plaintiffs’ common law negligence and public nuisance claims, but reversed the dismissal of the statutory strict liability count as to the individual plaintiffs. The court also reversed the dismissal of the statutory strict liability count as to the District of Columbia but only to the extent that the District seeks subrogated damages for named individuals for whom it has incurred medical expenses. Plaintiffs and defendants each filed separate petitions for rehearing on May 13, 2004. Oral argument was held before the D.C. Court of Appeals on January 11, 2005. On April 21, 2005, the D.C. Court of Appeals issued an opinion affirming its earlier decision. On July 20, 2005, defendants filed a Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Supreme Court. On August 15, 2005, defendants filed a motion to defer consideration of their petition for writ of certiorari. On August 26, 2005, respondents filed their opposition to defendants’ motion to defer.

PROTECTION OF LAWFUL COMMERCE IN ARMS ACT

      On July 29, 2005, the U.S. Senate passed Senate Bill 397, the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act. The bill is designed to prohibit civil liability actions from being brought or continued against manufacturers, distributors, dealers, or importers of firearms or ammunition for damages, injunctive, or other relief resulting from the misuse of their products by others. The U.S. House of Representatives has not yet voted on passage of the bill, although it voted to pass similar legislation in 2004. If the legislation passes the House and is signed by the President of the United States, it should result in the dismissal of the remaining municipal cases and preclude similar cases in the future. There can be no assurance that judges in existing proceedings will dismiss cases currently pending before them.

      (a) Exhibits:

      (b) Reports on Form 8-K:

SIGNATURES

      Pursuant to the requirements of the Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Dated: September 14, 2005

INDEX TO EXHIBITS