UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549


FORM 10-Q

 

 

(Mark One)

 

 

 

x

 

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006

OR

o

 

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from              to              .

Commission file number 0-16244

 


 

VEECO INSTRUMENTS INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

 

Delaware

11-2989601

(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)

(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)

 

 

100 Sunnyside Boulevard, Suite B

 

Woodbury, New York

11797-2902

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

(Zip Code)

 

 

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (516) 677-0200

 

 

Website: www.veeco.com

 


 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x    No o

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):

Large accelerated filer o    Accelerated filer x    Non-accelerated filer o

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes 
o    No x

30,728,321 shares of common stock, $0.01 par value per share, were outstanding as of the close of business on July 26, 2006.

 

 




 

SAFE HARBOR STATEMENT

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Report”) contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.  Discussions containing such forward-looking statements may be found in Items 2 and 3 hereof, as well as within this Report generally. In addition, when used in this Report, the words “believes,” “anticipates,” “expects,” “estimates,” “plans,” “intends,” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from projected results. These risks and uncertainties include, without limitation, the following:

·                  The cyclicality of the microelectronics industries we serve directly affects our business.

·                  We operate in an industry characterized by rapid technological change.

·                  We face significant competition.

·                  We depend on a limited number of customers that operate in highly concentrated industries.

·      Our quarterly operating results fluctuate significantly.

·                  We face securities class action and shareholder derivative lawsuits which could result in substantial costs, diversion of management’s attention and resources and negative publicity.

·                  Our acquisition strategy subjects us to risks associated with evaluating and pursuing these opportunities and integrating these businesses.

·                  Any difficulty or inability to attract, retain and motivate key employees could have a material adverse effect on our business.

·                  We are exposed to the risks of operating a global business and the requirement to comply with laws and regulations of various jurisdictions such as import/export controls, which may not apply to our non-U.S. competitors.

·                  We are subject to foreign currency exchange risks.

·                  Our success depends on protection of our intellectual property rights.

·                  We may be subject to claims of intellectual property infringement by others.

·                  We rely on a limited number of suppliers.

·                  Our outsourcing strategy could adversely affect our results of operations.

·                  Changes in accounting standards for stock-based compensation may adversely affect our stock price and our ability to attract, motivate and retain key employees.

·                  The implementation of a new information technology system may disrupt our operations.

·                  We may not obtain sufficient affordable funds to finance our future needs.

·                  We are subject to risks of non-compliance with environmental and safety regulations.

·                  We have adopted certain measures that may have anti-takeover effects which may make an acquisition of our company by another company more difficult.

·                  The other matters discussed under the heading “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” contained in this Report and in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 of Veeco Instruments Inc. (“Veeco” or the “Company”).

2




 

Consequently, such forward-looking statements should be regarded solely as the Company’s current plans, estimates and beliefs. The Company does not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect future events or circumstances after the date of such statements.

Available Information

We file annual, quarterly and current reports, information statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). The public may read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC also maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. The address of that site is http://www.sec.gov.

Internet Address

We maintain a website where additional information concerning our business and various upcoming events can be found. The address of our website is www.veeco.com. We provide a link on our website, under Investors — Financial Information — SEC Filings, through which investors can access our filings with the SEC, including our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and all amendments to those reports. These filings are posted to our Internet site, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with the SEC.

3




 

VEECO INSTRUMENTS INC.

INDEX

 

Page

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

 

 

 

Item 1.

Financial Statements (Unaudited):

 

 

 

 

 

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2006 and 2005

 

 

 

 

 

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2006 and 2005

 

 

 

 

 

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005

 

 

 

 

 

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2006 and 2005

 

 

 

 

 

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

 

 

 

 

Item 2.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 

 

 

 

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

 

 

 

 

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures

 

 

 

 

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

 

 

 

 

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings

 

 

 

 

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

 

 

 

 

Item 4.

Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

 

 

 

 

Item 6.

Exhibits

 

 

 

 

SIGNATURES

 

 

4




 

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(In thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)

 

 

 

Three Months Ended June 30,

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales

 

$

111,635

 

$

103,415

 

Cost of sales

 

61,923

 

59,989

 

Gross profit

 

49,712

 

43,426

 

Costs and expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

Selling, general and administrative expense

 

24,996

 

21,435

 

Research and development expense

 

15,252

 

15,863

 

Amortization expense

 

3,989

 

4,026

 

Other (income) expense, net

 

(132

)

70

 

Total operating expenses

 

44,105

 

41,394

 

Operating income

 

5,607

 

2,032

 

Interest expense, net

 

1,149

 

1,959

 

Income before income taxes

 

4,458

 

73

 

Income tax provision

 

1,433

 

522

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

3,025

 

$

(449

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss) per common share

 

$

0.10

 

$

(0.02

)

Diluted net income (loss) per common share

 

$

0.10

 

$

(0.02

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average shares outstanding

 

30,322

 

29,863

 

Diluted weighted average shares outstanding

 

31,254

 

29,863

 

 

See accompanying notes.

5




 

Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(In thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)

 

 

 

Six Months Ended June 30,

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales

 

$

205,553

 

$

197,265

 

Cost of sales

 

114,072

 

116,307

 

Gross profit

 

91,481

 

80,958

 

Costs and expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

Selling, general and administrative expense

 

46,326

 

41,606

 

Research and development expense

 

29,838

 

30,687

 

Amortization expense

 

8,004

 

8,516

 

Other expense (income), net

 

67

 

(28

)

Total operating expenses

 

84,235

 

80,781

 

Operating income

 

7,246

 

177

 

Interest expense, net

 

2,527

 

4,105

 

Gain on extinguishment of debt

 

(330

)

 

Income (loss) before income taxes

 

5,049

 

(3,928

)

Income tax provision

 

2,266

 

1,223

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

2,783

 

$

(5,151

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss) per common share

 

$

0.09

 

$

(0.17

)

Diluted net income (loss) per common share

 

$

0.09

 

$

(0.17

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average shares outstanding

 

30,208

 

29,859

 

Diluted weighted average shares outstanding

 

30,946

 

29,859

 

 

See accompanying notes.

6




 

Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands)

 

 

 

June 30,
2006

 

December 31,
2005

 

 

 

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets:

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

116,029

 

$

124,499

 

Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $2,306 in 2006 and $1,860 in 2005

 

88,673

 

89,230

 

Inventories

 

96,144

 

88,904

 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

12,002

 

9,640

 

Deferred income taxes

 

3,309

 

2,870

 

Total current assets

 

316,157

 

315,143

 

Property, plant and equipment at cost, less accumulated depreciation of $83,984 in 2006 and $77,954 in 2005

 

72,317

 

69,806

 

Goodwill

 

99,622

 

99,622

 

Purchased technology, less accumulated amortization of $58,341 in 2006 and $51,992 in 2005

 

49,235

 

55,776

 

Other intangible assets, less accumulated amortization of $24,199 in 2006 and $22,274 in 2005

 

20,670

 

22,413

 

Other assets

 

6,054

 

5,100

 

Total assets

 

$

564,055

 

$

567,860

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities and shareholders’ equity

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable

 

$

38,129

 

$

31,289

 

Accrued expenses

 

46,848

 

51,169

 

Deferred profit

 

685

 

537

 

Income taxes payable

 

2,145

 

2,123

 

Current portion of long-term debt

 

387

 

375

 

Total current liabilities

 

88,194

 

85,493

 

Deferred income taxes

 

1,671

 

1,048

 

Long-term debt

 

209,008

 

229,205

 

Other non-current liabilities

 

3,374

 

3,527

 

Shareholders’ equity

 

261,808

 

248,587

 

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

 

$

564,055

 

$

567,860

 

 

See accompanying notes.

7




 

Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)

 

 

Six Months Ended June 30,

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating activities

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

2,783

 

$

(5,151

)

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

14,594

 

15,080

 

Deferred income taxes

 

303

 

(101

)

Gain on extinguishment of debt

 

(330

)

 

Compensation expense for share-based payments

 

721

 

 

(Gain) loss on sale of property plant and equipment

 

(16

)

83

 

Other

 

21

 

 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts receivable

 

2,659

 

6,281

 

Inventories

 

(6,354

)

8,975

 

Accounts payable

 

6,765

 

2,953

 

Accrued expenses, deferred profit and other current liabilities

 

(1,576

)

(2,428

)

Other, net

 

(2,827

)

(1,598

)

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

16,743

 

24,094

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investing activities

 

 

 

 

 

Capital expenditures

 

(9,570

)

(4,550

)

Payments for net assets of businesses acquired

 

(3,161

)

(15,038

)

Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment and assets held for sale

 

35

 

2,178

 

Net maturities of investments

 

(80

)

(41

)

Other

 

(500

)

 

Net cash used in investing activities

 

(13,276

)

(17,451

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Financing activities

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from stock issuance

 

7,983

 

1,041

 

Repayments of long-term debt

 

(19,585

)

(176

)

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities

 

(11,602

)

865

 

Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents

 

(335

)

1,572

 

Net change in cash and cash equivalents

 

(8,470

)

9,080

 

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

 

124,499

 

100,276

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

 

$

116,029

 

$

109,356

 

 

See accompanying notes.

 

8




 

VEECO INSTRUMENTS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Note 1—Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation (consisting of normal recurring accruals) have been included. Operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2006.  For further information, refer to the financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.

Earnings (Loss) Per Share

The following table sets forth the reconciliation of weighted average shares outstanding and diluted weighted average shares outstanding:

 

 

Three months ended June 30,

 

Six months ended June 30,

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

2006

 

2005

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average shares outstanding

 

30,322

 

29,863

 

30,208

 

29,859

 

Dilutive effect of stock options and restricted stock awards

 

932

 

 

738

 

 

Dilutive weighted average shares outstanding

 

31,254

 

29,863

 

30,946

 

29,859

 

 

Net income and diluted net income per common share are computed using the weighted average number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding during the period. The effect of approximately 140,000 and 158,000 common equivalent shares for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, respectively, were anti-dilutive, and therefore are not included in the weighted average shares outstanding.

In addition, the effect of the assumed conversion of subordinated convertible notes into approximately 5.2 million and 5.3 million common equivalent shares is antidilutive, and therefore is not included in the weighted shares outstanding for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, respectively.  The effect of the assumed conversion of subordinated convertible notes into approximately 5.7 million common equivalent shares is antidilutive, and therefore is not included in the weighted average shares outstanding for the comparable prior year periods.

Share-Based Compensation

As of June 30, 2006, the Company has stock option and restricted stock plans, which are described more fully in Note 2. In addition, the Company assumed certain stock option plans and agreements in connection with various acquisitions, as also discussed in Note 2. Prior to 2006, the Company accounted for these stock option plans under the recognition and measurement principles of Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations and generally, no compensation expense was reflected in net income as all options granted under those plans had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment, which is a revision of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, supersedes APB No. 25 and amends SFAS No. 95, Statement of Cash Flows.  Generally, the approach in SFAS No. 123(R) is similar to the approach described in SFAS No. 123. However, SFAS No. 123(R) requires all share-based payments to employees and non-employee directors, including grants of stock options, to be recognized in the income statement based on their fair values. Pro forma disclosure is no longer an alternative.  SFAS No. 123(R) was adopted using the modified prospective method of application, which requires

9




 

Veeco to recognize compensation expense on a prospective basis. Therefore, prior period financial statements have not been restated. Under this method, in addition to reflecting compensation expense for new share-based awards, expense is also recognized to reflect the remaining service period of awards that had been included in the pro forma disclosures in prior periods.  SFAS No. 123(R) also requires the benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost to be reported as a financing cash flow, rather than as an operating cash flow as required under previous accounting literature, which  has the effect of reducing consolidated cash flows from operations and increasing cash flows from financing activities in periods after adoption. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, the Company did not recognize any amount of consolidated financing cash flows for such excess tax deductions.

Total share-based compensation expense is attributable to the remaining requisite service periods of stock options and restricted common stock awards. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, the Company granted 146,200 stock options and 198,250 restricted common stock awards to its directors, officers and employees. As a result of adopting SFAS No. 123(R), the Company’s net income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 was $0.2 million and $0.3 million lower, respectively,  than if it had continued to account for share-based compensation under APB No. 25. Net income per common share and diluted net income per common share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, are less than $0.01 and $0.01 lower, respectively, than if the Company had continued to account for share-based compensation under APB No. 25. As of June 30, 2006, the total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested stock awards and option awards is $5.1 million and $1.8 million, respectively, and the related weighted average period over which it is expected that such unrecognized compensation costs will be recognized is approximately 2.5 years for the nonvested stock awards and 2.4 years for option awards. Future share-based compensation expense will depend on levels of share-based awards granted in the future and, therefore, cannot be predicted at this time.

 Prior to the Company’s adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), SFAS No. 123 required that the Company provide pro forma information regarding net loss and loss per share as if compensation cost for the Company’s stock-based awards had been determined in accordance with the fair value method prescribed therein. In accordance with SFAS No. 123, the following table illustrates the effect on net loss and net loss per share if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions, under which compensation expense would be recognized as incurred, to stock-based employee compensation.

 

 

Three months ended
June 30, 2005

 

Six months ended
June 30, 2005

 

 

 

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss, as reported

 

$

(449

)

$

(5,151

)

Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax effects

 

(21,192

)

(25,216

)

Pro forma net loss

 

$

(21,641

)

$

(30,367

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss per common share:

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss and diluted net loss per common share, as reported

 

$

(0.02

)

$

(0.17

)

Net loss and diluted net loss per common share, pro forma

 

$

(0.72

)

$

(1.02

)

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB Interpretation No. (“FIN”) 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes.  FIN 48 clarifies the accounting and disclosure for income taxes by defining the threshold for recognizing the benefits of tax return positions in the financial statements as “more-likely-than-not” to be sustained by the taxing authority.  It also provides guidance on derecognition, measurement and classification of income tax uncertainties, along with any related interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition.  FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006.  The Company is currently assessing the impact of FIN 48 on its consolidated financial position and results of operations.

10




 

Note 2—Share-Based Payments

Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plans

The Company has several stock option and restricted stock plans. The Veeco Instruments Inc. 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended, (the “2000 Plan”), was approved by the Board of Directors and shareholders in May 2000. The 2000 Plan provides for the grant to officers and key employees of up to 8,530,000 options (1,776,524 options are available for future grants as of June 30, 2006) to purchase shares of common stock of the Company. Stock options granted pursuant to the 2000 Plan expire after seven years and generally become exercisable over a three-year period following the grant date. However, grants made under the 2000 Plan between June 17, 2005 and December 23, 2005 became exercisable on or before December 31, 2005, and are subject to a resale restriction which provides that the shares issuable upon exercise of the option may not be transferred prior to the second anniversary of the option grant date. In addition, the 2000 Plan provides for automatic annual grants of 5,000 shares of restricted stock to each member of the Board of Directors of the Company who is not an employee of the Company.  Up to 1,700,000 of the awards authorized under the 2000 Plan may be issued in the form of restricted stock (1,456,750 shares are available for future grants as of June 30, 2006). In June 2006, the Company granted 158,250 shares of restricted common stock to key employees, which vest over three years, and in May 2006, granted 40,000 shares of restricted common stock to the non-employee members of the Board of Directors, which vest over a period of one year.

A summary of the Company’s restricted stock awards as of June 30, 2006, is presented below:

 

 

Shares
(000’s)

 

Weighted-
Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value

 

Nonvested at beginning of year

 

45

 

$

15.60

 

Granted

 

198

 

24.32

 

Vested

 

 

 

Forfeited

 

 

 

Nonvested at June 30, 2006

 

243

 

$

22.71

 

 

The Veeco Instruments Inc. 2000 Stock Option Plan for Non-Officer Employees (the “Non-Officer Plan”) was approved by the Board of Directors in October 2000. The Non-Officer Plan provided for the grant of stock options to non-officer employees to purchase shares of common stock of the Company. Stock options granted pursuant to the Non-Officer Plan become exercisable over a three-year period following the grant date and expire after seven years.

The Veeco Instruments Inc. Amended and Restated 1992 Employees’ Stock Option Plan (the “1992 Plan”) provided for the grant to officers and key employees of stock options to purchase shares of common stock of the Company. Stock options granted pursuant to the 1992 Plan become exercisable over a three-year period following the grant date and expire after ten years.

The Veeco Instruments Inc. 1994 Stock Option Plan for Outside Directors, as amended, (the “Directors’ Option Plan”), provided for automatic annual grants of stock options to each member of the Board of Directors of the Company who is not an employee of the Company. Such options are exercisable immediately and expire after ten years.

The Non-Officer Plan, the 1992 Plan and the Directors’ Option Plan have been frozen; and, thus, there are no options available for future grant as of June 30, 2006 under these plans.

In addition to the plans described above, the Company assumed certain stock option plans and agreements relating to the merger in September 2001 with Applied Epi, Inc. (“Applied Epi”). These stock option plans do not have options available for future grants and expire after ten years from the date of grant. Options granted under two of the plans vested over three years and options granted under one of the plans vested immediately. As of June 30, 2006, there are 200,477 options outstanding under the various Applied Epi plans. In addition, Veeco assumed certain warrants related to Applied Epi, which were in effect prior to the merger with Veeco. These warrants expired in February 2006.

In May 2000, the Company assumed certain stock option plans and agreements related to CVC, Inc. and Commonwealth Scientific Corporation, a subsidiary of CVC, Inc., which were in effect prior to the merger with Veeco.

11




 

These plans do not have options available for future grants, the options granted thereunder generally vested over a three to five year period and expire five to ten years from the date of grant. As of June 30, 2006, there are 7,251 options outstanding under the various CVC, Inc. and Commonwealth Scientific Corporation plans.

With the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) on January 1, 2006, the Company is required to record the fair value of stock-based compensation awards as an expense. In order to determine the fair value of stock options on the date of grant, the Company applies the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Inherent in the model are assumptions related to expected stock-price volatility, option life, risk-free interest rate and dividend yield. While the risk-free interest rate and dividend yield are less subjective assumptions, typically based on factual data derived from public sources, the expected stock-price volatility and option life assumptions require a level of judgment which make them critical accounting estimates.

Beginning in the fourth quarter of 2005, the Company used an expected stock-price volatility assumption that is a combination of both historical and implied volatilities of the underlying stock, which are obtained from public data sources. Prior to that time, the Company based this assumption solely on historical volatility.

With regard to the weighted-average option life assumption, the Company considers the exercise behavior of past grants and models the pattern of aggregate exercises.

The fair value of each option granted during the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:

Weighted-average expected stock-price volatility

 

40%

 

Weighted-average expected option life

 

3 years

 

Average risk-free interest rate

 

4.99%

 

Average dividend yield

 

0%

 

 

The fair value of each option grant that was unvested as of January 1, 2006, was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:

Weighted-average expected stock-price volatility

 

60%

 

Weighted-average expected option life

 

4 years

 

Average risk-free interest rate

 

3.64%

 

Average dividend yield

 

0%

 

 

A summary of the Company’s stock option plans as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2006, is presented below:

 

Shares
(000’s)

 

Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price

 

Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value (000s)

 

Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual Life
(in years)

 

Outstanding at beginning of year

 

7,834

 

$

24.81

 

 

 

 

 

Granted

 

146

 

23.61

 

 

 

 

 

Exercised

 

(454

)

17.38

 

 

 

 

 

Forfeited (including cancelled options)

 

(292

)

23.49

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding at June 30, 2006

 

7,234

 

$

25.30

 

$

21,035

 

3.5

 

Options exercisable at June 30, 2006

 

6,982

 

$

25.45

 

$

20,350

 

3.4

 

 

The weighted-average grant date fair value of stock options granted for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 was $7.61.  The weighted-average grant date fair value of stock options granted for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 was $8.05 and $7.99,  respectively.  The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 was $2.8 million and $3.2 million, respectively.  The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 was less than $0.1 million and $0.1 million, respectively.

12




 

The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at June 30, 2006:

 

Options Outstanding

 

Options Exercisable

 

Range of Exercise
Prices

 

Number
Outstanding at
June 30, 2006
(000’s)

 

Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual Life
(in years)

 

Weighted-
Average
Exercise Price

 

Number
Outstanding at
June 30, 2006
(000’s)

 

Weighted-
Average
Exercise Price

 

$0.27

 

97

 

4.5

 

$

0.27

 

97

 

$

0.27

 

10.25-15.35

 

223

 

4.8

 

14.62

 

180

 

14.62

 

15.45-23.11

 

3,823

 

4.3

 

19.48

 

3,760

 

19.48

 

23.61-35.00

 

2,197

 

2.8

 

29.59

 

2,051

 

30.02

 

35.75-50.60

 

834

 

1.3

 

44.19

 

834

 

44.19

 

54.35-72.00

 

60

 

2.9

 

55.91

 

60

 

55.91

 

 

 

7,234

 

3.5

 

$

25.30

 

6,982

 

$

25.45

 

 

On April 12, 2005, the Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) of the Company’s Board of Directors approved the acceleration of vesting for unvested, out-of-the-money stock options granted under the Company’s stock option plans prior to September 1, 2004.  An option was considered out-of-the-money if the option exercise price was greater than the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the NASDAQ National Market on April 11, 2005 ($15.26), the last trading day before the Committee approved the acceleration.  As a result of this action, options to purchase approximately 2,522,000 shares of the Company’s common stock became immediately exercisable, including options held by the Company’s executive officers to purchase approximately 852,000 shares of common stock.  The weighted average exercise price of the options for which vesting was accelerated was $21.24.

The purpose of the accelerated vesting was to avoid future compensation expense of approximately $7.9 million in 2006 and $3.6 million in 2007 associated with these options that the Company would otherwise recognize in its Consolidated Statements of Operations upon the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) (see Note 1).  In addition, many of these options had exercise prices significantly in excess of current market values and were not providing an effective means of employee retention and incentive compensation.

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

Under the Veeco Instruments Inc. Amended and Restated Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESP Plan”), the Company is authorized to issue up to 2,000,000 shares of common stock to its full-time U.S. employees, nearly all of whom are eligible to participate. Under the terms of the ESP Plan, employees can choose to have up to 10% of their annual base earnings withheld to purchase the Company’s common stock. The purchase price of the stock as of June 30, 2006 was 95% of the end-of-offering period market price and qualifies as a noncompensatory employee stock purchase plan under Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Shares Reserved for Future Issuance

As of June 30, 2006, the Company has reserved the following shares for future issuance related to:

Issuance upon exercise of stock options and issuance of restricted stock

 

9,010,505

 

Issuance upon conversion of subordinated debt

 

5,193,456

 

Issuance of shares pursuant to the ESP Plan

 

1,453,582

 

Total shares reserved

 

15,657,543

 

 

Preferred Stock

The Board of Directors of the Company has authority under the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation to issue shares of preferred stock with voting and economic rights to be determined by the Board or Directors.

 

13




 

Note 3—Balance Sheet Information

Inventories

Inventories have been determined by lower of cost (principally first-in, first-out) or market.  Inventories consist of:

 

 

June 30, 2006

 

December 31, 2005

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Raw materials

 

$

51,932

 

$

45,357

 

Work in progress

 

32,469

 

33,307

 

Finished goods

 

11,743

 

10,240

 

 

 

$

96,144

 

$

88,904

 

 

Accrued Warranty

The Company estimates the costs that may be incurred under the warranty it provides and recognizes a liability in the amount of such costs at the time the related revenue is recognized.  Factors that affect the Company’s warranty liability include product failure rates, material usage and labor costs incurred in correcting product failures during the warranty period.  The Company periodically assesses the adequacy of its recognized warranty liability and adjusts the amount as necessary.  Changes in the Company’s warranty liability during the period are as follows:

 

 

Six Months Ended June 30,

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance as of January 1

 

$

6,671

 

$

6,771

 

Warranties issued during the period

 

3,353

 

2,833

 

Settlements made during the period

 

(3,264

)

(3,160

)

Balance as of June 30

 

$

6,760

 

$

6,444

 

 

Note 4—Segment Information

As of January 1, 2006, the Company changed its management structure in a manner that caused the composition of its reportable segments to change. The Company currently manages the business, reviews operating results and assesses performance, as well as allocates resources, based upon two separate reporting segments. The Company merged the former Ion Beam and Mechanical Process Equipment segment and the Epitaxial Process Equipment segment into one reporting segment. The new Process Equipment segment combines the etch, deposition, dicing and slicing products sold mostly to data storage customers and the molecular beam epitaxy and metal organic chemical vapor deposition products primarily sold to high brightness light emitting diode and wireless telecommunications customers. This segment includes production facilities in Plainview, New York, Ft. Collins, Colorado, Camarillo, California, St. Paul, Minnesota and Somerset, New Jersey. The Metrology segment remains unchanged and represents equipment that is used to provide critical surface measurements on products such as semiconductor devices and thin film magnetic heads and includes Veeco’s broad line of atomic force microscopes, optical interferometers and stylus profilers sold to semiconductor customers, data storage customers and thousands of research facilities and scientific centers. This segment includes production facilities in Santa Barbara, California and Tucson, Arizona.  Accordingly, the Company has restated segment information for the prior periods presented.

The Company evaluates the performance of its reportable segments based on income or loss from operations before interest, income taxes and amortization (“EBITA”). The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies. Items excluded from segment profit primarily consist of interest, amortization, income taxes, corporate expenses, as well as other unusual charges for purchased in-process technology, restructuring and asset impairment charges and merger-related costs. Corporate expenses are comprised primarily of general and administrative expenses.

 

14




The following tables present certain data pertaining to the reportable product segments of the Company and a reconciliation of EBITA to income (loss) before income taxes for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, and goodwill and total assets as of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 (in thousands):

 

 

 

Process
Equipment

 

Metrology

 

Unallocated
Corporate
Amount

 

Total

 

Three Months Ended June 30, 2006

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales

 

$

67,361

 

$

44,274

 

$

 

$

111,635

 

Income (loss) before interest, taxes, amortization and certain items (EBITA)

 

7,801

 

6,316

 

(4,521

)

9,596

 

Interest expense, net

 

 

 

1,149

 

1,149

 

Amortization expense

 

3,288

 

441

 

260

 

3,989

 

Income (loss) before income taxes

 

4,513

 

5,875

 

(5,930

)

4,458

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Three Months Ended June 30, 2005

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales

 

$

61,157

 

$

42,258

 

$

 

$

103,415

 

Income (loss) before interest, taxes, amortization and certain items (EBITA)

 

2,269

 

6,517

 

(2,728

)

6,058

 

Interest expense, net

 

 

 

1,959

 

1,959

 

Amortization expense

 

3,294

 

457

 

275

 

4,026

 

(Loss) income before income taxes

 

(1,025

)

6,060

 

(4,962

)

73

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Six Months Ended June 30, 2006

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales

 

$

120,552

 

$

85,001

 

$

 

$

205,553

 

Income (loss) before interest, taxes, amortization and certain items (EBITA)

 

9,677

 

11,928

 

(6,355

)

15,250

 

Interest expense, net

 

 

 

2,527

 

2,527

 

Amortization expense

 

6,576

 

895

 

533

 

8,004

 

Other items

 

 

 

(330

)

(330

)

Income (loss) before income taxes

 

3,101

 

11,033

 

(9,085

)

5,049

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Six Months Ended June 30, 2005

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales

 

$

111,519

 

$

85,746

 

$

 

$

197,265

 

(Loss) income before interest, taxes, amortization and certain items (EBITA)

 

(433

)

14,279

 

(5,153

)

8,693

 

Interest expense, net

 

 

 

4,105

 

4,105

 

Amortization expense

 

6,888

 

1,038

 

590

 

8,516

 

(Loss) income before income taxes

 

(7,321

)

13,241

 

(9,848

)

(3,928

)

 

15




 

 

 

 

Process
Equipment

 

Metrology

 

Unallocated
Corporate
Amount

 

Total

 

As of June 30, 2006

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Goodwill

 

$

70,254

 

$

29,368

 

$

 

$

99,622

 

Total assets

 

297,035

 

136,903

 

130,117

 

564,055

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2005

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Goodwill

 

$

70,254

 

$

29,368

 

$

 

$

99,622

 

Total assets

 

300,617

 

132,928

 

134,315

 

567,860

 

 

Corporate total assets are comprised principally of cash at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005.

Note 5—Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Total comprehensive income (loss) was $4.0 million and $4.5 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, and ($2.4) million and ($8.7) million for the three and six months ended 2005, respectively. The Company’s comprehensive income (loss) is comprised of net income (loss) and foreign currency translation adjustments.

Note 6—Other Matters

As of June 30, 2006, the Company has outstanding $200.0 million of 4.125% convertible subordinated notes.  During the first quarter of 2006, the Company repurchased $20.0 million of its notes, reducing the amount outstanding from $220.0 million to $200.0 million.  The repurchase amount was $19.5 million in cash, of which $19.4 million related to principal and $0.1 million related to accrued interest.  As a result of the repurchase, the Company recorded a gain from the early extinguishment of debt in the amount of $0.6 million, offset by a $0.3 million proportionate reduction in the related deferred financing costs for a net gain of $0.3 million.

In conjunction with a cost reduction plan announced by the Company in October 2005, the Company recognized a restructuring charge of approximately $1.2 million in the fourth quarter of 2005. The $1.2 million charge consisted of personnel severance costs for approximately 37 employees which included management, administration and manufacturing employees located at the Company’s Plainview, New York, Camarillo, California and Somerset, New Jersey Process Equipment operations and the Santa Barbara, California Metrology operations. As of June 30, 2006, approximately $1.0 million has been paid and approximately $0.2 million remains in accrued expenses. The Company expects to pay the remainder by the fourth quarter of 2006.

A reconciliation of the liability for the 2005 restructuring charge for severance costs is as follows (in millions):

 

Process
Equipment

 

Metrology

 

Total

 

Charged to accrual

 

$

0.8

 

$

0.4

 

$

1.2

 

Cash payments during 2005

 

0.2

 

0.1

 

0.3

 

Balance as of December 31, 2005

 

0.6

 

0.3

 

0.9

 

Cash payments during the six months ended June 30, 2006

 

0.5

 

0.2

 

0.7

 

Balance as of June 30, 2006

 

$

0.1

 

$

0.1

 

$

0.2

 

 

Note 7—Business Acquisition and Related Party Transaction

In May 2006, Veeco invested $0.5 million to purchase 19.9% of the common stock of Fluens Corporation (“Fluens”).  Approximately 31% of Fluens is owned by a Vice President of Veeco.  Veeco and Fluens plan to jointly develop a next-generation process for high-rate deposition of aluminum oxide for data storage applications.  If this development is successful and upon the satisfaction of certain additional conditions by May 2009, Veeco will be obligated to purchase the balance of the outstanding stock of Fluens for $3.0 million and pay an earn-out.  In April 2006, Veeco issued a $0.8 million purchase order to Fluens for a reactive sputtering deposition system.  Veeco had advanced approximately $0.4 million against this purchase order as of June 30, 2006.

 

16




Item 2.           Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Executive Summary:

Veeco designs, manufactures, markets and services a broad line of equipment primarily used by manufacturers in the data storage, scientific and industrial research, semiconductor, high-brightness light emitting diode (“HB-LED”) and wireless industries. These industries help create a wide range of information age products such as computer integrated circuits, personal computers, hard disk drives, network servers, digital cameras, wireless phones, TV set-top boxes, personal music/video players and personal digital assistants. The Company’s broad line of products features leading edge technology and allows customers to improve time-to-market of their next generation products. Veeco’s products are also enabling advancements in the growing fields of nanoscience, nanobiology and other areas of scientific and industrial research.

The Company currently manages the business, reviews operating results and assesses performance, as well as allocates resources, based upon two separate reporting segments.  As of January 1, 2006, the Company merged the former Ion Beam and Mechanical Process Equipment segment and the Epitaxial Process Equipment segment into one reporting segment. The new Process Equipment segment combines the etch, deposition, dicing and slicing products sold mostly to data storage customers and the molecular beam epitaxy (“MBE”) and metal organic chemical vapor deposition (“MOCVD”) products primarily sold to HB-LED and wireless telecommunications customers. The Metrology segment remains unchanged and represents equipment that is used to provide critical surface measurements on products such as semiconductor devices and thin film magnetic heads and includes Veeco’s broad line of atomic force microscopes (“AFMs”), optical interferometers and stylus profilers sold to semiconductor customers, data storage customers and thousands of research facilities and scientific centers. This equipment allows customers to monitor their products throughout the manufacturing process in order to improve yields, reduce costs and improve product quality. The Company’s metrology solutions are also key research instruments used by many universities, scientific laboratories and industrial applications.

Veeco currently maintains manufacturing facilities in Arizona, California, Colorado, Minnesota, New Jersey and New York, with sales and service locations around the world.  Each of Veeco’s products is currently manufactured in only one location, as management believes that the technological know-how and precision needed to make each of the Company’s products requires specialized expertise.

Highlights of the Second Quarter of 2006:

·                  Revenue was $111.6 million, an 8% increase over the second quarter of 2005.

·                  Orders were $143.2 million, up 21% from the second quarter of 2005.

·                  Gross margin was 44.5%, up from 42.0% for the second quarter of 2005.

·                  Net income was $3.0 million, or $0.10 per share, compared to a loss of ($0.4) million, or ($0.02) per share, in the second quarter of 2005.

Highlights of the First Half of 2006:

·                  Revenue was $205.6 million, a 4% increase over the first half of 2005.

·                  Orders were $269.9 million, up 24% from the comparable 2005 period.

·                  Gross margin was 44.5%, up from 41.0% for the first half of 2005.

·                  Net income was $2.8 million, or $0.9 per share, compared to a loss of ($5.2) million, or ($0.17) per share in the comparable prior year period.

 

17




Current Business Conditions/Outlook:

In the first half of 2006, Veeco’s revenues were $205.6 million, up $8.3 million from $197.3 million in the first six months of 2005.  Operating income for the first half of 2006 was $7.2 million, compared to $0.2 million in the prior year period.  Net income for the first six months of 2006 was $2.8 million, or diluted net income of $0.09 per share, compared to a net loss of ($5.2) million, or diluted net loss of ($0.17) per share, for the first six months of 2005.

Veeco’s orders for the first half of 2006 were $269.9 million, reflecting double digit market growth in data storage and in HB-LED/wireless. Within the strong order rate, Veeco’s data storage orders increased 34% from the prior year period to $141.8 million.  Another area of strength was in HB-LED/wireless, which reported orders of $51.7 million, up 90% from the prior year period.  The strong order rate for the first half of 2006 reflects market growth in embedded storage for consumer electronic applications, the hard drive industry’s investment in capacity requirements as well as technology changes such as perpendicular recording, and the beginning of HB-LED backlighting for emerging applications such as personal computers and flat panel televisions.

Veeco is continuing its strategy for growth as well as its focus on improving profitability and gross margin performance.  For the remainder of 2006, the Company has planned significant new product introductions in both the Process Equipment and Metrology business units, which are expected to provide an opportunity for revenue growth. Veeco has forecasted that 2006 revenues will grow by approximately 11-13% over  2005 to $455-$465 million.  In addition, consumer spending on many types of electronics has increased and various worldwide regions, such as the Asia-Pacific region, are experiencing growth. The Company reviews a number of indicators to predict the strength of its markets going forward, including plant utilization trends, capacity requirements and capital spending trends.  Many of these trends have remained positive through the current year.  However, Veeco currently anticipates its orders in the third quarter will decrease from the strong second quarter rate due to the seasonal buying patterns that the Company has experienced in recent years.  The Company believes that orders will recover again in the fourth quarter.

Technology changes are continuing in all of Veeco’s markets: the continued increase of 80 GB hard drives and investment in 120 GB hard drives in data storage; the increased use of “mini” drives in consumer electronic applications; the increased use of Veeco’s automated AFMs for 65 nanometer and below semiconductor applications; the opportunity for Veeco’s MOCVD and MBE products to further penetrate the emerging wireless and HB-LED markets. Veeco believes that these changes, together with the continued funding of nanoscience research, will prompt customers to seek the Company’s next-generation solutions to address their manufacturing and technology challenges.

The Company’s goal is to continue to increase gross margins in 2006, with improvements in both Process Equipment and Metrology. Veeco has forecasted that gross margins will increase from 42.4% in 2005 to approximately 45% in 2006 and has already realized gross margins of 44.5% for the first half of the year. Veeco anticipates that progress in this area will continue to come from increased sales volume, the introduction of new products with higher gross margins, and better supply chain management, including outsourcing of new products and development of common hardware and software platforms.

 

18




Results of Operations:

Three Months Ended June 30, 2006 and 2005

The following tables show selected items of Veeco’s Consolidated Statements of Operations, percentages of sales and comparisons between the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 and the analysis of sales and orders for the same periods by segment, industry and regions (in thousands):

 

 

 

Three Months ended
June 30,

 

Dollar

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

Change

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales

 

$

111,635

 

100.0

%

$

103,415

 

100.0

%

$

8,220

 

Cost of sales

 

61,923

 

55.5

 

59,989

 

58.0

 

1,934

 

Gross profit

 

49,712

 

44.5

 

43,426

 

42.0

 

6,286

 

Operating expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Selling, general and administrative expense

 

24,996

 

22.4

 

21,435

 

20.7

 

3,561

 

Research and development expense

 

15,252

 

13.7

 

15,863

 

15.3

 

(611

)

Amortization expense

 

3,989

 

3.5

 

4,026

 

3.9

 

(37

)

Other (income) expense, net

 

(132

)

(0.1

)

70

 

0.1

 

(202

)

Total operating expenses

 

44,105

 

39.5

 

41,394

 

40.0

 

2,711

 

Operating income

 

5,607

 

5.0

 

2,032

 

2.0

 

3,575

 

Interest expense, net

 

1,149

 

1.0

 

1,959

 

1.9

 

(810

)

Income before income taxes

 

4,458

 

4.0

 

73

 

0.1

 

4,385

 

Income tax provision

 

1,433

 

1.3

 

522

 

0.5

 

911

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

3,025

 

2.7

%

$

(449

)

(0.4

)%

$

3,474

 

 

 

 

Sales

 

Orders

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Three Months ended
June 30,

 

Dollar and
Percentage

 

Three Months ended
June 30,

 

Dollar and
Percentage

 

Book to Bill
Ratio

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

Change
Year to Year

 

2006

 

2005

 

Change
Year to Year

 

2006

 

2005

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Segment Analysis

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Process Equipment

 

$

67,361

 

$

61,157

 

$

6,204

 

10.1

%

$

94,309

 

$

68,387

 

$

25,922

 

37.9

%

1.40

 

1.12

 

Metrology

 

44,274

 

42,258

 

2,016

 

4.8

 

48,899

 

50,166

 

(1,267

)

(2.5

)

1.10

 

1.19

 

Total

 

$

111,635

 

$

103,415

 

$

8,220

 

7.9

%

$

143,208

 

$

118,553

 

$

24,655

 

20.8

%

1.28

 

1.15

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Industry Analysis

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Data Storage

 

$

53,105

 

$

47,370

 

$

5,735

 

12.1

%

$

71,446

 

$

60,391

 

$

11,055

 

18.3

%

1.35

 

1.27

 

HB-LED/wireless

 

18,424

 

13,905

 

4,519

 

32.5

 

27,405

 

13,278

 

14,127

 

106.4

 

1.49

 

0.95

 

Semiconductor

 

12,448

 

16,896

 

(4,448

)

(26.3

)

19,997

 

18,966

 

1,031

 

5.4

 

1.61

 

1.12

 

Research and Industrial

 

27,658

 

25,244

 

2,414

 

9.6

 

24,360

 

25,918

 

(1,558

)

(6.0

)

0.88

 

1.03

 

Total

 

$

111,635

 

$

103,415

 

$

8,220

 

7.9

%

$

143,208

 

$

118,553

 

$

24,655

 

20.8

%

1.28

 

1.15

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regional Analysis

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

US

 

$

32,244

 

$

29,842

 

$

2,402

 

8.0

%

$

51,812

 

$

31,360

 

$

20,452

 

65.2

%

1.61

 

1.05

 

Europe

 

16,095

 

23,006

 

(6,911

)

(30.0

)

9,648

 

22,728

 

(13,080

)

(57.6

)

0.60

 

0.99

 

Japan

 

11,297

 

20,769

 

(9,472

)

(45.6

)

19,596

 

19,060

 

536

 

2.8

 

1.73

 

0.92

 

Asia-Pacific

 

51,999

 

29,798

 

22,201

 

74.5

 

62,152

 

45,405

 

16,747

 

36.9

 

1.20

 

1.52

 

Total

 

$

111,635

 

$

103,415

 

$

8,220

 

7.9

%

$

143,208

 

$

118,553

 

$

24,655

 

20.8

%

1.28

 

1.15

 

 

Net sales of $111.6 million for the second quarter of 2006 were up $8.2 million compared to the second quarter of 2005. By segment, process equipment sales were up $6.2 million or 10.1%. The increase in process equipment sales is primarily due to an increase in sales to data storage customers driven by an increase in the production of data storage devices.  Metrology sales increased $2.0 million primarily due to increased AFM sales to the research and industrial markets.  By region, net sales increased by 74.5% and 8.0% in Asia-Pacific and the U.S., respectively, while sales in Japan and Europe declined by 45.6% and 30.0%, respectively. The Company believes that there will continue to be quarter-to-quarter variations in the geographic distribution of sales.

 

19




Orders of $143.2 million for the second quarter of 2006 increased by $24.7 million, or 20.8%, from the comparable 2005 period. By segment, the 37.9% increase in process equipment orders was primarily driven by continued market growth in the data storage and HB-LED/wireless sectors reflecting growth in embedded storage in consumer electronics, continued investment in perpendicular recording technology, and HB-LED backlighting of small area flat panel displays. The 2.5% decrease in metrology orders was due to a $4.5 million decrease in orders for optical metrology products, partially offset by a $3.2 million increase in orders for AFM products.

The Company’s book-to-bill ratio for the second quarter of 2006, which is calculated by dividing orders received in a given time period by revenue recognized in the same time period was 1.28.  The Company’s backlog as of June 30, 2006 is $159.1 million, compared to $114.1 million as of December 31, 2005. During the quarter ended June 30, 2006, the Company experienced backlog adjustments and order cancellations of $10.5 million, primarily in the HB-LED/wireless industry for MOCVD products.  The Company also experienced rescheduling of order delivery dates by customers.  Due to changing business conditions and customer requirements, the Company may continue to experience cancellations and/or rescheduling of orders.

Gross profit for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, was 44.5%, as compared to 42.0% in the second quarter of 2005.  Process equipment gross margins increased from 36.7% to 40.3%, primarily due to an increase in sales volume of $6.2 million, favorable product mix, cost reductions and improved supply chain management, which included outsourcing in this segment.  Metrology gross margins increased to 51.0% from 49.7%, principally due to higher sales volume and favorable product mix of optical metrology products.

Selling, general and administrative expenses were $25.0 million, or 22.4% of sales in the second quarter of 2006, compared with $21.4 million, or 20.7%, in the comparable prior year period.  The $3.6 million increase is primarily attributable to annual incentive compensation related expenses, including stock options, restricted shares, severance and cash incentives as well as annual salary increases.  In addition, selling, general and administrative expenses increased due to litigation related expenses for the securities class action and consolidated derivative action lawsuits  as well as expansion of field sales and marketing personnel to support the Company’s new product introductions and the Company’s Asia-Pacific operations.

Research and development expense totaled $15.3 million in the second quarter of 2006, a decrease of $0.6 million from the second quarter of 2005, primarily due to the timing of new product development efforts in AFM and MOCVD.  As a percentage of sales, research and development decreased in the second quarter of 2006 to 13.7% from 15.3% for the comparable prior year period.

Amortization expense remained flat at $4.0 million in the second quarter of 2006 compared with the second quarter of 2005.

Net interest expense in the second quarter of 2006 was $1.1 million compared to $2.0 million in the second quarter of 2005.  This reduction was due to an increase in interest rates and higher cash balances invested during the second quarter of 2006 compared to the comparable prior year period, as well as the reduction in interest expense related to the early extinguishment of debt.

Income tax provision for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 was $1.4 million compared to $0.5 million in the second quarter of 2005. The 2006 provision for income taxes included $1.1 million relating to Veeco’s foreign operations which continue to be profitable and $0.3 million relating to the Company’s domestic operations.  Due to significant domestic net operating losses, which are fully reserved by a valuation allowance, Veeco’s domestic operations are not expected to incur significant income taxes for the foreseeable future. The 2005 provision for income taxes of $0.5 million related to Veeco’s foreign operations, which were profitable.

20




Six Months Ended June 30, 2006 and 2005

The following tables show selected items of Veeco’s Consolidated Statements of Operations, percentages of sales and comparisons between the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, and the analysis of sales and orders for the same periods by segment, industry and regions (in thousands):

 

 

Six Months ended
June 30,

 

Dollar
Change

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales

 

$

205,553

 

100.0

%

$

197,265

 

100.0

%

$

8,288

 

Cost of sales

 

114,072

 

55.5

 

116,307

 

59.0

 

(2,235

)

Gross profit

 

91,481

 

44.5

 

80,958

 

41.0

 

10,523

 

Operating expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Selling, general and administrative expense

 

46,326

 

22.6

 

41,606

 

21.1

 

4,720

 

Research and development expense

 

29,838

 

14.5

 

30,687

 

15.5

 

(849

)

Amortization expense

 

8,004

 

3.9

 

8,516

 

4.3

 

(512

)

Other expense (income), net

 

67

 

 

(28

)

 

95

 

Total operating expenses

 

84,235

 

41.0

 

80,781

 

40.9

 

3,454

 

Operating income

 

7,246

 

3.5

 

177

 

0.1

 

7,069

 

Interest expense, net

 

2,527

 

1.2

 

4,105

 

2.1

 

(1,578

)

Gain on extinguishment of debt

 

(330

)

(0.2

)

 

 

(330

)

Income (loss) before income taxes

 

5,049

 

2.5

 

(3,928

)

(2.0

)

8,977

 

Income tax provision

 

2,266

 

1.1

 

1,223

 

0.6

 

1,043

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

2,783

 

1.4

%

$

(5,151

)

(2.6

)%

$

7,934

 

 

 

 

Sales

 

Orders

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Six Months ended
June 30,

 

Dollar and
Percentage
Change
Year to Year

 

Six Months ended
June 30,

 

Dollar and
Percentage
Change
Year to Year

 

Book to Bill
Ratio

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

0000

 

0000

 

2006

 

2005

 

0000

 

0000

 

2006

 

2005

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Segment Analysis

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Process Equipment

 

$

120,552

 

$

111,519

 

$

9,033

 

8.1

 %

$

177,802

 

$

123,812

 

$

53,990

 

43.6

 %

1.47

 

1.11

 

Metrology

 

85,001

 

85,746

 

(745

)

(0.9

)

92,100

 

93,678

 

(1,578

)

(1.7

)

1.08

 

1.09

 

Total

 

$

205,553

 

$

197,265

 

$

8,288

 

4.2

 %

$

269,902

 

$

217,490

 

$

52,412

 

24.1

 %

1.31

 

1.10

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Industry Analysis

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Data Storage

 

$

93,188

 

$

72,985

 

$

20,203

 

27.7

 %

$

141,832

 

$

105,694

 

$

36,138

 

34.2

 %

1.52

 

1.45

 

HB-LED/wireless

 

33,520

 

36,209

 

(2,689

)

(7.4

)

51,732

 

27,245

 

24,487

 

89.9

 

1.54

 

0.75

 

Semiconductor

 

23,757

 

34,250

 

(10,493

)

(30.6

)

30,095

 

33,394

 

(3,299

)

(9.9

)

1.27

 

0.98

 

Research and Industrial

 

55,088

 

53,821

 

1,267

 

2.4

 

46,243

 

51,157

 

(4,914

)

(9.6

)

0.84

 

0.95

 

Total

 

$

205,553

 

$

197,265

 

$

8,288

 

4.2

 %

$

269,902

 

$

217,490

 

$

52,412

 

24.1

 %

1.31

 

1.10

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regional Analysis

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

US

 

$

64,445

 

$

62,602

 

$

1,843

 

2.9

 %

$

88,388

 

$

68,624

 

$

19,764

 

28.8

 %

1.37

 

1.10

 

Europe

 

34,450

 

44,200

 

(9,750

)

(22.1

)

26,816

 

32,702

 

(5,886

)

(18.0

)

0.78

 

0.74

 

Japan

 

26,298

 

34,984

 

(8,686

)

(24.8

)

31,174

 

36,411

 

(5,237

)

(14.4

)

1.19

 

1.04

 

Asia-Pacific

 

80,360

 

55,479

 

24,881

 

44.8

 

123,524

 

79,753

 

43,771

 

54.9

 

1.54

 

1.44

 

Total

 

$

205,553

 

$

197,265

 

$

8,288

 

4.2

 %

$

269,902

 

$

217,490

 

$

52,412

 

24.1

 %

1.31

 

1.10

 

 

Net sales of $205.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 were up $8.3 million compared to the six months ended June 30, 2005. By segment, process equipment sales were up $9.0 million or 8.1%. The increase in process equipment sales is primarily due to sales to data storage customers driven by an increase in the production of data storage devices.  Metrology sales decreased $0.7 million, primarily due to decreased optical metrology sales.  By region, sales in Asia-Pacific increased by 44.8%, while sales in Japan and Europe declined by 24.8% and 22.1%, respectively.  The Company believes that there will continue to be period-to-period variations in the geographic distribution of sales.

21




Orders of $269.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 increased by $52.4 million, or 24.1%, from the comparable 2005 period. By segment, the 43.6% increase in process equipment orders was primarily driven by the continued strong data storage industry conditions resulting from the expanded use of hard drives in consumer electronics as well as improved conditions in the HB-LED/wireless market.  The 1.7% decrease in metrology orders was due to a $1.5 million decrease in optical metrology products and a $0.1 million decrease in AFM products.

The Company’s book-to-bill ratio for the six months ended June 30, 2006, which is calculated by dividing orders received in a given time period by revenue recognized in the same time period was 1.31.  The Company’s backlog as of June 30, 2006 is $159.1 million, compared to $114.1 million as of December 31, 2005. During the six months ended June 30, 2006, the Company experienced backlog adjustments and order cancellations of $19.3 million, primarily in the HB-LED/wireless industry for MOCVD products.  The Company also experienced rescheduling of order delivery dates by customers.  Due to changing business conditions and customer requirements, the Company may continue to experience cancellations and/or rescheduling of orders.

Gross profit for the six months ended June 30, 2006, was 44.5%, as compared to 41.0% in the comparable prior year period.  Process equipment gross margins increased to 39.3% from 33.6%, primarily due to an increase in sales volume of $9.0 million, favorable product mix, cost reductions and improved supply chain management, which included outsourcing in this segment.  Metrology gross margins increased to 51.9% from 50.7%, principally due to better product mix.

Selling, general and administrative expenses were $46.3 million, or 22.6% of sales in the six months ended June 30, 2006, compared with $41.6 million, or 21.1% of sales in the six months ended June 30, 2005. The $4.7 million increase is primarily attributable to annual incentive related compensation expenses, including stock options, restricted shares, severance and cash incentives as well as annual salary increases.  In addition, selling, general and administrative expenses increased due to litigation related expenses for the securities class action and consolidated derivative action lawsuits as well as expansion of field sales and marketing personnel to support the Company’s new product introductions and the Company’s Asia-Pacific operations.

Research and development expense totaled $29.8 million in the six months ended June 30, 2006, a decrease of $0.8 million from the comparable period of 2005, primarily due to the timing of new product development efforts.  As a percentage of sales, research and development decreased during the 2006 period to 14.5% from 15.5% for the comparable 2005 period.

Amortization expense totaled $8.0 million in the six months ended June 30, 2006, compared with $8.5 million in the prior year period, due to certain intangible assets becoming fully amortized.

During the six months ended June 30, 2006, the Company repurchased $20.0 million aggregate principal amount of its 4.125% convertible subordinated notes. As a result of this repurchase, the amount of convertible subordinated notes outstanding was reduced to $200.0 million, and the Company recorded a gain from the early extinguishment of debt in the amount of $0.6 million, offset by a $0.3 million proportionate reduction in the related deferred financing costs, for a net gain of $0.3 million.

Net interest expense in the six months ended June 30, 2006 was $2.5 million compared to $4.1 million in the prior year period.  This reduction was due to an increase in interest rates and higher cash balances invested during the six months ended June 30, 2006, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2005, as well as the reduction in interest expense related to the early extinguishment of debt.

Income tax provision for the six months ended June 30, 2006 was $2.3 million compared to $1.2 million in the prior year period.  The 2006 provision for income taxes included $1.7 million relating to Veeco’s foreign operations, which continue to be profitable, and $0.6 million relating to the Company’s domestic operations.  Due to significant domestic net operating losses, which are fully reserved by a valuation allowance, Veeco’s domestic operations are not expected to incur significant income taxes for the foreseeable future. The 2005 provision for income taxes of $1.2 million primarily related to Veeco’s foreign operations, which were profitable.

22




Liquidity and Capital Resources

Historically, Veeco’s principal capital requirements have included the funding of acquisitions and capital expenditures. The Company generates cash from operations, revolving credit facilities and debt and stock issuances. Veeco’s ability to generate sufficient cash flows from operations is primarily dependent on the continued demand for the Company’s products and services.

The Company had a net decrease in cash of $8.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 from December 31, 2005. Cash provided by operations was $16.7 million for this period, as compared to cash provided by operations of $24.1 million for the comparable 2005 period. Net income (loss) adjusted for non-cash items provided operating cash flows of $18.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006, compared to $9.9 million for the comparable 2005 period. Included in the net cash provided by operations for the six months ended June 30, 2006, was an increase in net operating assets and liabilities of $1.3 million. Accounts receivable decreased $2.7 million during the six months ended June 30, 2006, primarily due to an improvement in days sales outstanding.  Inventories increased by approximately $6.4 million during the same period, principally due to the ramp up for the expected increases in production for the third quarter.  Accounts payable increased by $6.8 million, as the Company managed its payables to increase days payable outstanding, as well as the increase in inventory purchases to support the production ramp.  Accrued expenses and other current liabilities decreased $1.6 million during the six months ended June 30, 2006, due to a reduction in incentive compensation under the Company’s annual bonus plans, reflecting the timing of the payments which occurred during the first quarter of the year.

Cash used in investing activities of $13.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006, resulted primarily from capital expenditures of $9.6 million and earn-out payments totaling $3.2 million to the former owners of TurboDisc and Nanodevices Inc. The Company expects to invest approximately $21.0 million in total during 2006 in capital projects primarily related to engineering equipment and lab tools used in producing Veeco’s products, enhanced manufacturing facilities and the continuing implementation of SAP and related computer systems.

Cash used in financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2006 totaled $11.6 million, primarily consisting of cash used in the repurchase of a portion of the Company’s outstanding 4.125% convertible notes, as discussed below, partially offset by $8.0 million of common stock issuances resulting from the exercise of employee stock options.

As of June 30, 2006, the Company has outstanding $200.0 million of 4.125% convertible subordinated notes.  During the first quarter of 2006, the Company repurchased $20.0 million of its notes, reducing the amount outstanding from $220.0 million to $200.0 million.  The repurchase amount was $19.5 million in cash, of which $19.4 million related to principal and $0.1 million related to accrued interest.  As a result of the repurchase, the Company recorded a gain from the early extinguishment of debt in the amount of $0.6 million, offset by a $0.3 million proportionate reduction in the related deferred financing costs, for a net gain of $0.3 million. The Company may engage in similar transactions in the future depending on market conditions, its cash position and other factors.

The Company believes that existing cash balances together with cash generated from operations and amounts available under the Company’s revolving credit facility will be sufficient to meet the Company’s projected working capital and other cash flow requirements for the next twelve months, as well as the Company’s contractual obligations, over the next three years. The Company believes it will be able to meet its obligation to repay the outstanding $200.0 million convertible subordinated notes that mature on December 21, 2008, through a combination of conversion of the notes outstanding, refinancing, cash generated from operations and/or other means.

The Company is potentially liable for earn-out payments to the former owners of certain acquired businesses based on revenue targets achieved by the acquired businesses.  During the first quarter of 2006, the Company paid an earn-out payment of $2.0 million to the former owner of TurboDisc.  During the second quarter of 2006, the Company paid approximately $1.2 million to the former shareholders of Nanodevices Inc. Both amounts were accrued at December 31, 2005. No additional payments will be required in the future to either set of former owners.  The Company is potentially liable for an earn-out payment to the former shareholders of Advanced Imaging, Inc. based on achieving revenue in excess of certain targets for 2006, which currently do not appear achievable.

23




In May 2006, Veeco invested $0.5 million to purchase 19.9% of the common stock of Fluens Corporation (“Fluens”).  Approximately 31% of Fluens is owned by a related party who is a Vice President of Veeco.  Veeco and Fluens plan to jointly develop a next-generation process for high-rate deposition of aluminum oxide for data storage applications.  If this development is successful and upon the satisfaction of certain additional conditions by May 2009, Veeco will be obligated to purchase the balance of the outstanding stock of Fluens for $3.0 million and pay an earn-out.  The Company will accrue liabilities that may arise from this transaction when management believes the outcomes of the relevant contingencies are determinable beyond a reasonable doubt.  In April 2006, Veeco issued a $0.8 million purchase order to Fluens for a reactive sputtering deposition system.  Veeco had advanced approximately $0.4 million against this purchase order as of June 30, 2006.

Application of Critical Accounting Policies

General:  Veeco’s discussion and analysis of its financial condition and results of operations are based upon the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S generally accepted accounting principles. The preparation of these financial statements requires Veeco to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. On an on-going basis, management evaluates its estimates and judgments, including those related to bad debts, inventories, intangible assets and other long lived assets, income taxes, warranty obligations, restructuring costs and contingent liabilities, including potential litigation. Management bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. The Company considers certain accounting policies related to revenue recognition, the valuation of inventories, the impairment of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets, the impairment of long-lived assets, warranty costs, the accounting for deferred taxes and share-based compensation to be critical policies due to the estimation processes involved in each.

Revenue Recognition:  The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with the SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 104, Revenue Recognition. Certain of Veeco’s product sales are accounted for as multiple-element arrangements in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) 00-21, Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables. A multiple-element arrangement is a transaction which may involve the delivery or performance of multiple products, services, or rights to use assets, and performance may occur at different points in time or over different periods of time. The Company recognizes revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the sales price is fixed or determinable and collectibility is reasonably assured. For products produced according to the Company’s published specifications, where no installation is required or installation is deemed perfunctory and no substantive customer acceptance provisions exist, revenue is recognized when title passes to the customer, generally upon shipment. For products produced according to a particular customer’s specifications, revenue is recognized when the product has been tested, it has been demonstrated that it meets the customer’s specifications and title passes to the customer. The amount of revenue recorded is reduced by the amount of any customer retention (generally 10% to 20%), which is not payable by the customer until installation is completed and final customer acceptance is achieved. Installation is not deemed to be essential to the functionality of the equipment since installation does not involve significant changes to the features or capabilities of the equipment or require the building of complex interfaces and connections. In addition, the equipment could be installed by the customer or other vendors and generally the cost of installation approximates only 1% to 2% of the sales value of the related equipment. For new products, new applications of existing products, or for products with substantive customer acceptance provisions where performance cannot be fully assessed prior to meeting customer specifications at the customer site, revenue is recognized upon completion of installation and receipt of final customer acceptance. Since title to goods generally passes to the customer upon shipment and 80% to 90% of the contract amount becomes payable at that time, inventory is relieved and accounts receivable is recorded for the amount billed at the time of shipment. The profit on the amount billed for these transactions is deferred and recorded as deferred profit in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. At June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, $0.7 million and $0.5 million, respectively, are recorded in deferred profit. Service and maintenance contract revenues are recorded as deferred revenue, which is included in other accrued expenses, and recognized as revenue on a straight-line basis over the service period of the related contract.

24




Inventory Valuation:  Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (principally first-in, first-out method) or market. Management evaluates the need to record adjustments for impairment of inventory on a quarterly basis. The Company’s policy is to assess the valuation of all inventories, including raw materials, work-in-process, finished goods and spare parts. Obsolete inventory or inventory in excess of management’s estimated usage for the next 18 to 24 month’s requirements is written-down to its estimated market value, if less than its cost. Inherent in the estimates of market value are management’s estimates related to Veeco’s future manufacturing schedules, customer demand, technological and/or market obsolescence, possible alternative uses and ultimate realization of excess inventory.

Goodwill and Indefinite-Lived Intangible Asset Impairment:  The Company has significant intangible assets related to goodwill and other acquired intangibles. In assessing the recoverability of the Company’s goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets, the Company must make assumptions regarding estimated future cash flows and other factors to determine the fair value of the respective assets. If it is determined that impairment indicators are present and that the assets will not be fully recoverable, their carrying values are reduced to estimated fair value. Impairment indicators include, among other conditions, cash flow deficits, an historic or anticipated decline in revenue or operating profit, adverse legal or regulatory developments, and a material decrease in the fair value of some or all of the assets. Assets are grouped at the lowest levels for which there are identifiable cash flows that are largely independent of the cash flows generated by other asset groups. Changes in strategy and/or market conditions could significantly impact these assumptions, and thus Veeco may be required to record impairment charges for those assets not previously recorded.

Long-Lived Asset Impairment:  The carrying values of long-lived assets are periodically reviewed to determine if any impairment indicators are present. If it is determined that such indicators are present and the review indicates that the assets will not be fully recoverable, based on undiscounted estimated cash flows over the remaining depreciation period, their carrying values are reduced to estimated fair value. Impairment indicators include, among other conditions, cash flow deficits, an historic or anticipated decline in revenue or operating profit, adverse legal or regulatory developments, and a material decrease in the fair value of some or all of the assets. Assets are grouped at the lowest level for which there is identifiable cash flows that are largely independent of the cash flows generated by other asset groups. Assumptions utilized by management in reviewing for impairment of long-lived assets could be affected by changes in strategy and/or market conditions which may require Veeco to record additional impairment charges for these assets, as well as impairment charges on other long-lived assets not previously recorded.

Warranty Costs:  The Company estimates the costs that may be incurred under the warranty it provides and records a liability in the amount of such costs at the time the related revenue is recognized. Estimated warranty costs are determined by analyzing specific product and historical configuration statistics and regional warranty support costs. The Company’s warranty obligation is affected by product failure rates, material usage and labor costs incurred in correcting product failures during the warranty period. As the Company’s customer engineers and process support engineers are highly trained and deployed globally, labor availability is a significant factor in determining labor costs. The quantity and availability of critical replacement parts is another significant factor in estimating warranty costs. Unforeseen component failures or exceptional component performance can also result in changes to warranty costs. If actual warranty costs differ substantially from the Company’s estimates, revisions to the estimated warranty liability would be required.

Deferred Tax Valuation Allowance:  As part of the process of preparing Veeco’s Consolidated Financial Statements, the Company is required to estimate its income taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which it operates. This process involves estimating the actual current tax expense, together with assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included within its Consolidated Balance Sheets. The carrying value of deferred tax assets is adjusted by a valuation allowance to recognize the extent to which the future tax benefits will be recognized on a more likely than not basis. Veeco’s net deferred tax assets consist primarily of net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards, and timing differences between the book and tax treatment of inventory and other asset valuations. Realization of these net deferred tax assets is dependent upon the Company’s ability to generate future taxable income.

25




Veeco records valuation allowances in order to reduce the Company’s deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized. In assessing the adequacy of recorded valuation allowances, management considers a variety of factors, including the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, future taxable income, and prudent and feasible tax planning strategies. Under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 109, factors such as current and previous operating losses are given significantly greater weight than the outlook for future profitability in determining the deferred tax asset carrying value.

At June 30, 2006, the Company had a valuation allowance of $71.5 million against substantially all of its domestic net deferred tax assets, which consist of net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards, as well as temporary deductible differences.  The valuation allowance was calculated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 109, which places primary importance on the Company’s historical results of operations. Although the Company’s results in prior years were significantly affected by restructuring and other charges, the Company’s historical loss and the losses incurred in 2005 and 2004 represent negative evidence sufficient to require a full valuation allowance under the provisions of SFAS No. 109. If the Company is able to realize part or all of the deferred tax assets in future periods, it will reduce its provision for income taxes with a release of the valuation allowance in an amount that corresponds with the income tax liability generated.

Share-Based Compensation:  Prior to 2006, the Company accounted for its stock option plans under the recognition and measurement principles of Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations and generally, no compensation expense was reflected in net income as all options granted under those plans had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment, which is a revision of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, supersedes APB No. 25 and amends SFAS No. 95, Statement of Cash Flows.  Generally, the approach in SFAS No. 123(R) is similar to the approach described in SFAS No. 123. However, SFAS No. 123(R) requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the income statement based on their fair values. Pro forma disclosure is no longer an alternative.  SFAS No. 123(R) was adopted using the modified prospective method of application, which requires Veeco to recognize compensation expense on a prospective basis. Therefore, prior period financial statements have not been restated. Under this method, in addition to reflecting compensation expense for new share-based awards, expense is also recognized to reflect the remaining service period of awards that had been included in the pro forma disclosures in prior periods.  SFAS No. 123(R) also requires the benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost to be reported as a financing cash flow, rather than as an operating cash flow as required under previous accounting literature, which has the effect of reducing consolidated net operating cash flows and increasing consolidated net financing cash flows in periods after adoption. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, the Company did not recognize any amount of consolidated financing cash flows for such excess tax deductions.

Total share-based compensation expense is attributable to the remaining requisite service periods of stock options and restricted common stock awards. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, the Company granted 146,200 stock options and 198,250 restricted common stock awards to its directors, officers and employees. As a result of adopting SFAS No. 123(R), the Company’s net income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 was $0.2 million and $0.3 million lower, respectively, than if it had continued to account for share-based compensation under APB No. 25. Net income per common share and diluted net income per common share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 are less than $0.01 and $0.01 lower, respectively, than if the Company had continued to account for share-based compensation under APB No. 25. As of June 30, 2006, the total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested stock awards and option awards is $5.1 million and $1.8 million, respectively, and the related weighted average period over which it is expected that such unrecognized compensation costs will be recognized is approximately 2.5 years for the nonvested stock awards and 2.4 years for option awards. Future share-based compensation expense will depend on levels of share-based awards granted in the future and, therefore, cannot be predicted at this time.

With the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) on January 1, 2006, the Company is required to record the fair value of stock-based compensation awards as an expense. In order to determine the fair value of stock options on the date of grant, the Company applies the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Inherent in the model are assumptions related to expected stock-price volatility, option life, risk-free interest rate and dividend yield. While the risk-free interest rate and dividend yield are less subjective assumptions, typically based on factual data derived from public sources, the expected stock-price volatility and option life assumptions require a level of judgment which make them critical accounting estimates. Beginning in the fourth quarter of 2005, the Company used an expected stock-price

26




volatility assumption that is a combination of both historical and implied volatilities of the underlying stock, which are obtained from public data sources. Prior to that time, the Company based this assumption solely on historical volatility. With regard to the weighted-average option life assumption, the Company considers the exercise behavior of past grants and models the pattern of aggregate exercises.

Other Recent Accounting Pronouncements:  In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB Interpretation No. (“FIN”) 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes.  FIN 48 clarifies the accounting and disclosure for income taxes by defining the threshold for recognizing the benefits of tax return positions in the financial statements as “more-likely-than-not” to be sustained by the taxing authority.  It also provides guidance on derecognition, measurement and classification of income tax uncertainties, along with any related interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition.  FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006.  The Company is currently assessing the impact of FIN 48 on its consolidated financial position and results of operations.

27




Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Veeco’s net sales to foreign customers represented approximately 71.1% and 68.6% of Veeco’s total net sales for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, respectively,  and 71.1% and 68.3% for the comparable 2005 periods, respectively. The Company expects that net sales to foreign customers will continue to represent a large percentage of Veeco’s total net sales. Veeco’s net sales denominated in foreign currencies represented approximately 16.4% and 16.5% of Veeco’s total net sales for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, respectively, and 17.1% and 19.2% for the comparable 2005 periods, respectively. The aggregate foreign currency exchange losses included in determining the consolidated results of operations was approximately $0.1 million and $0.4 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, respectively, and $0.1 million and $0.1 million for the comparable 2005 periods, respectively.  Included in the aggregate foreign currency exchange losses, were losses of approximately $0.1 million and gains of approximately $0.1 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, respectively, and gains of less than $0.1 million for each of the comparable 2005 periods. Veeco is exposed to financial market risks, including changes in foreign currency exchange rates. The changes in currency exchange rates that have the largest impact on translating Veeco’s international operating profit are the Japanese Yen and the Euro. Veeco uses derivative financial instruments to mitigate these risks. Veeco does not use derivative financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes. The Company enters into monthly forward contracts to reduce the effect of fluctuating foreign currencies on short-term foreign currency-denominated intercompany transactions and other known currency exposures. The average notional amount of such contracts was approximately $4.1 million and $3.9 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, respectively. As of June 30, 2006, the Company had entered into forward contracts for the month of July for the notional amount of approximately $23.9 million, which approximates the fair market value on June 30, 2006.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

The Company’s senior management is responsible for establishing and maintaining a system of disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15 and 15d-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)) designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms.  Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuer’s management, including its principal executive officer or officers and principal financial officer or officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

The Company has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures under the supervision of and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as of the end of the period covered by this report.  Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting them to material information required to be included in our periodic Securities and Exchange Commission filings.

The Company is presently in the process of implementing new company-wide integrated applications software and, to date, has completed the conversion to this new platform in approximately 70% of Veeco’s businesses with the remainder expected to be completed in the first half of 2007. As a result, certain changes have been made to the Company’s internal controls, which management believes will strengthen the Company’s internal control structure.  There have been no other significant changes in our internal controls or other factors during the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2006 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

28




Part II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.  Legal Proceedings.

In re Veeco Instruments Inc. Securities Litigation and Shareholder Derivative Litigation

Veeco and certain of its officers have been named as defendants in a consolidated securities class action lawsuit pending in federal court in the Southern District of New York (the “Court”).  The lawsuit arises out of the restatement in March 2005 of Veeco’s financial statements for the quarterly periods and nine months ended September 30, 2004 as a result of the Company’s discovery of certain improper accounting transactions at its TurboDisc business unit.  The plaintiffs in the lawsuit seek unspecified damages and assert claims against all defendants for violations of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and claims against the individual defendants for violations of Section 20(b) of the Exchange Act.  The Court has certified a plaintiff class for the lawsuit consisting of all persons who acquired the Company’s securities during the period from April 26, 2004 through February 10, 2005.  The parties are currently involved in the discovery process.  Although the Company believes this lawsuit is without merit and intends to defend vigorously against the claims, the lawsuit could result in substantial costs, divert management’s attention and resources from our operations and negatively affect our public image and reputation.

In addition, three shareholder derivative lawsuits have been consolidated and are also pending before the Court.  The plaintiffs in the consolidated derivative action assert that the Company’s directors and certain of its officers breached fiduciary duties in connection with the improper accounting transactions at the TurboDisc business unit.  The plaintiffs in the consolidated derivative action seek unspecified damages allegedly sustained by the Company and the return of all bonuses, restricted stock, stock options and other incentive compensation.  The parties are currently involved in the discovery process on this action.  An unfavorable outcome or prolonged litigation in these matters could materially harm the Company’s business.

Item 1A.  Risk Factors.

Information regarding risk factors appears in the “Safe Harbor Statement” at the beginning of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in Part I — Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.  There have been no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

The annual meeting of stockholders of the Company was held on May 5, 2006. The matters voted on at the meeting were: (a) the election of three directors: (i) Edward H. Braun, (ii) Richard A. D’Amore and (iii) Douglas A. Kingsley; and (b) ratification of the Board’s appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2006.  The terms of each of the following directors continued after the meeting: Heinz K. Fridrich, Roger D. McDaniel,  Irwin H. Pfister, Joel A. Elftmann, Paul R. Low and Peter J. Simone.  As of the record date for the meeting, there were 30,152,702 shares of common stock outstanding, each of which was entitled to one vote with respect to each of the matters voted on at the meeting. Each of the directors up for reelection was reelected and the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm was ratified by the required number of votes on each such matter.  The results of the voting were as follows:

Matter

 

For

 

Withheld

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(a)(i)

 

27,615,725

 

507,202

 

(a)(ii)

 

27,615,566

 

507,361

 

(a)(iii)

 

27,836,198

 

286,429

 

 

Matter

 

For

 

Against

 

Abstained

 

Broker
Non-Votes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(b)

 

27,119,197

 

968,777

 

34,952

 

 

 

29




Item 6. Exhibits.

Unless otherwise indicated, each of the following exhibits has been previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by the Company under File No. 0-16244.

Number

 

Description

 

Incorporated by Reference to the Following
Document:

 

 

 

 

 

10.1

 

Veeco Instruments Inc. 2006 Long-Term Cash Incentive Plan

 

*

 

 

 

 

 

10.2

 

Form of Amendment to Employment Agreement of Edward H. Braun and John F. Rein, Jr.

 

*

 

 

 

 

 

10.3

 

Form of Amendment to Letter Agreement of John K. Bulman, John P. Kiernan, Robert P. Oates and Jeannine M. Sargent

 

*

 

 

 

 

 

10.4

 

Veeco Instruments Inc. Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, effective July 20, 2006

 

*

 

 

 

 

 

31.1

 

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a — 14(a) or Rule 15d — 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

 

*

 

 

 

 

 

31.2

 

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a — 14(a) or Rule 15d — 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

 

*

 

 

 

 

 

32.1

 

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

*

 

 

 

 

 

32.2

 

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

*


*              Filed herewith

 

30




SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Date:  August 4, 2006

 

Veeco Instruments Inc.

 

 

 

 

By:

/s/ EDWARD H. BRAUN

 

 

Edward H. Braun
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

 

By:

/s/ JOHN F. REIN, JR.

 

 

John F. Rein, Jr.
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary

 

 

31




INDEX TO EXHIBITS

Unless otherwise indicated, each of the following exhibits has been previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by the Company under File No. 0-16244.

Number

 

Description

 

Incorporated by Reference to the Following Document:

 

 

 

 

 

10.1

 

Veeco Instruments Inc. 2006 Long-Term Cash Incentive Plan

 

*

 

 

 

 

 

10.2

 

Form of Amendment to Employment Agreement of Edward H. Braun and John F. Rein, Jr.

 

*

 

 

 

 

 

10.3

 

Form of Amendment to Letter Agreement of John K. Bulman, John P. Kiernan, Robert P. Oates and Jeannine M. Sargent

 

*

 

 

 

 

 

10.4

 

Veeco Instruments Inc. Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, effective July 20, 2006

 

*

 

 

 

 

 

31.1

 

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a — 14(a) or Rule 15d — 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

 

*

 

 

 

 

 

31.2

 

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a — 14(a) or Rule 15d — 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

 

*

 

 

 

 

 

32.1

 

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

*

 

 

 

 

 

32.2

 

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

*


*              Filed herewith