UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007

OR

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from               to                      

Commission file number: 333-90273

FIDELITY D & D BANCORP, INC.

STATE OF INCORPORATION:

 

IRS EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NO:

PENNSYLVANIA

 

23-3017653

 

Address of principal executive offices:

BLAKELY & DRINKER ST.

DUNMORE, PENNSYLVANIA 18512

TELEPHONE:

570-342-8281

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subjected to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

x YES    o NO

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer.  See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.  (Check one):

Large accelerated filer o     Accelerated filer o     Non-accelerated filer x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

o YES    x NO

The number of outstanding shares of Common Stock of Fidelity D & D Bancorp, Inc. at July 31, 2007, the latest practicable date, was 2,067,620 shares.

               



FIDELITY D & D BANCORP, INC.

Form 10-Q June 30, 2007

Index

Part I. Financial Information

 

 

Item 1.

Financial Statements:

 

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2007
and December 31, 2006

 

Consolidated Statements of Income for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006

 

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity
for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006

 

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months
ended June 30, 2007 and 2006

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

 

Item 2.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations

 

 

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk

 

 

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures

 

 

Part II. Other Information

 

 

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings

 

 

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

 

 

Item 2.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

 

 

Item 3.

Defaults Upon Senior Securities

 

 

Item 4.

Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

 

 

Item 5.

Other Information

 

 

Item 6.

Exhibits

 

 

Signatures

 

 

Exhibit index

 

2




PART I – Financial Information

Item 1: Financial Statements

FIDELITY D & D BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

 

Consolidated Balance Sheets

 

 

 

June 30, 2007

 

December 31, 2006

 

 

 

(unaudited)

 

(audited)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and due from banks

 

$

12,096,955

 

$

13,732,137

 

Interest-bearing deposits with financial institutions

 

123,578

 

68,711

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total cash and cash equivalents

 

12,220,533

 

13,800,848

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Available-for-sale securities

 

106,712,776

 

98,841,364

 

Held-to-maturity securities

 

1,251,710

 

1,569,372

 

Federal Home Loan Bank Stock

 

4,151,900

 

3,795,100

 

Loans and leases, net (allowance for loan losses of $5,294,537 in 2007 and $5,444,303 in 2006)

 

420,153,494

 

417,199,048

 

Loans available-for-sale (fair value $208,896 in 2007; $123,156 in 2006)

 

204,800

 

122,000

 

Bank premises and equipment, net

 

13,331,402

 

11,324,465

 

Cash surrender value of bank owned life insurance

 

8,331,225

 

8,177,961

 

Other assets

 

4,587,944

 

4,788,105

 

Accrued interest receivable

 

2,546,684

 

2,502,576

 

Foreclosed assets held for sale

 

 

197,149

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total assets

 

$

573,492,468

 

$

562,317,988

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

Deposits:

 

 

 

 

 

Interest-bearing

 

$

349,263,741

 

$

336,592,620

 

Non-interest-bearing

 

72,067,616

 

73,741,975

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total deposits

 

421,331,357

 

410,334,595

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accrued interest payable and other liabilities

 

4,235,491

 

4,179,170

 

Short-term borrowings

 

29,601,083

 

33,656,150

 

Long-term debt

 

66,125,522

 

62,536,210

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total liabilities

 

521,293,453

 

510,706,125

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shareholders’ equity:

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred stock authorized 5,000,000 shares with no par value; none issued

 

 

 

Capital stock authorized 10,000,000 shares with no par value; issued and outstanding, 2,067,620 shares in 2007 and 2,057,433 shares in 2006

 

19,056,491

 

18,702,537

 

Retained earnings

 

35,170,129

 

33,874,118

 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

 

(2,027,605

)

(964,792

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total shareholders’ equity

 

52,199,015

 

51,611,863

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

 

$

573,492,468

 

$

562,317,988

 

 

See notes to consolidated financial statements

3




 

FIDELITY D & D BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

 

Consolidated Statements of Income

(unaudited)

 

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

Six Months Ended

 

 

 

June 30, 2007

 

June 30, 2006

 

June 30, 2007

 

June 30, 2006

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loans and leases:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Taxable

 

$

7,141,888

 

$

6,879,670

 

$

14,316,917

 

$

13,378,288

 

Nontaxable

 

118,352

 

121,462

 

227,869

 

253,620

 

Interest-bearing deposits with financial institutions

 

1,929

 

2,239

 

4,721

 

4,776

 

Investment securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. government agency and corporations

 

1,016,972

 

986,083

 

1,936,260

 

1,871,265

 

States and political subdivisions (nontaxable)

 

124,512

 

150,274

 

249,351

 

291,318

 

Other securities

 

280,523

 

230,802

 

526,422

 

429,212

 

Federal funds sold

 

202

 

638

 

54,654

 

36,126

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total interest income

 

8,684,378

 

8,371,168

 

17,316,194

 

16,264,605

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deposits

 

3,222,678

 

2,750,117

 

6,556,701

 

5,147,023

 

Securities sold under repurchase agreements

 

115,576

 

163,426

 

231,033

 

298,875

 

Other short-term borrowings and other

 

260,939

 

162,229

 

334,012

 

224,191

 

Long-term debt

 

762,629

 

1,029,972

 

1,567,702

 

2,098,783

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total interest expense

 

4,361,822

 

4,105,744

 

8,689,448

 

7,768,872

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net interest income

 

4,322,556

 

4,265,424

 

8,626,746

 

8,495,733

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Provision for loan losses

 

 

175,000

 

 

250,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net interest income after provision for loan losses

 

4,322,556

 

4,090,424

 

8,626,746

 

8,245,733

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Service charges on deposit accounts

 

761,922

 

635,054

 

1,394,239

 

1,266,781

 

Gain (loss) on sale of:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loans

 

31,171

 

26,858

 

67,896

 

41,843

 

Investment securities

 

 

2

 

 

(166

)

Premises and equipment

 

(22,924

)

 

73,633

 

1,560

 

Leased assets

 

 

100

 

 

15,154

 

Foreclosed assets held for sale

 

127,621

 

216

 

142,749

 

621

 

Fees and other service charges

 

431,324

 

421,722

 

864,260

 

886,984

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total other income

 

1,329,114

 

1,083,952

 

2,542,777

 

2,212,777

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Salaries and employee benefits

 

2,165,352

 

1,974,057

 

4,300,329

 

3,980,871

 

Premises and equipment

 

784,285

 

823,559

 

1,590,110

 

1,624,410

 

Advertising

 

183,620

 

159,904

 

342,625

 

288,277

 

Other

 

954,296

 

990,629

 

1,967,532

 

1,977,341

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total other expenses

 

4,087,553

 

3,948,149

 

8,200,596

 

7,870,899

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income before provision for income taxes

 

1,564,117

 

1,226,227

 

2,968,927

 

2,587,611

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Provision for income taxes

 

405,384

 

287,607

 

765,843

 

617,360

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

1,158,733

 

$

938,620

 

$

2,203,084

 

$

1,970,251

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Per share data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income - basic

 

$

0.56

 

$

0.45

 

$

1.07

 

$

0.96

 

Net income - diluted

 

$

0.56

 

$

0.45

 

$

1.07

 

$

0.96

 

Dividends

 

$

0.22

 

$

0.22

 

$

0.44

 

$

0.44

 

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

4




 

FIDELITY D & D BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

 

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity

For the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

other

 

 

 

 

 

Capital stock

 

Retained

 

comprehensive

 

 

 

 

 

Shares

 

Amount

 

earnings

 

income (loss)

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2005 (audited)

 

1,854,217

 

$

10,594,901

 

$

39,363,461

 

$

(1,112,333

)

$

48,846,029

 

Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net of tax

 

 

 

 

 

(343,717

)

 

 

(343,717

)

Total comprehensive income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

1,970,251

 

 

 

1,970,251

 

Change in net unrealized holding losses on available-for-sale securities, net of reclassification adjustment and tax effects

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1,235,511

)

(1,235,511

)

Comprehensive income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

734,740

 

Issuance of common stock through Employee Stock Purchase Plan

 

1,571

 

48,151

 

 

 

 

 

48,151

 

Dividends reinvested through Dividend Reinvestment Plan

 

7,638

 

283,819

 

 

 

 

 

283,819

 

Stock-based compensation expense

 

 

 

28,744

 

 

 

 

 

28,744

 

Cash dividends declared

 

 

 

 

 

(898,916

)

 

 

(898,916

)

Stock dividend declared

 

185,394

 

7,462,100

 

(7,469,548

)

 

 

(7,448

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, June 30, 2006 (unaudited)

 

2,048,820

 

$

18,417,715

 

$

32,621,531

 

$

(2,347,844

)

$

48,691,402

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2006 (audited)

 

2,057,433

 

$

18,702,537

 

$

33,874,118

 

$

(964,792

)

$

51,611,863

 

Total comprehensive income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

2,203,084

 

 

 

2,203,084

 

Change in net unrealized holding losses on available-for-sale securities, net of reclassification adjustment and tax effects

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1,034,092

)

(1,034,092

)

Change in cash flow hedge intrinsic value

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(28,721

)

(28,721

)

Comprehensive income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,140,271

 

Issuance of common stock through Employee Stock Purchase Plan

 

2,266

 

67,820

 

 

 

 

 

67,820

 

Dividends reinvested through Dividend Reinvestment Plan

 

7,921

 

279,176

 

 

 

 

 

279,176

 

Stock-based compensation expense

 

 

 

6,958

 

 

 

 

 

6,958

 

Cash dividends declared

 

 

 

 

 

(907,073

)

 

 

(907,073

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, June 30, 2007 (unaudited)

 

2,067,620

 

$

19,056,491

 

$

35,170,129

 

$

(2,027,605

)

$

52,199,015

 

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

5




 

FIDELITY DEPOSIT & DISCOUNT BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

 

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(unaudited)

 

 

 

Six Months Ended

 

 

 

June 30, 2007

 

June 30, 2006

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows from operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

2,203,084

 

$

1,970,251

 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation, amortization and accretion

 

586,199

 

669,504

 

Provision for loan losses

 

 

250,000

 

Deferred income tax (benefit) expense

 

(67,626

)

32,967

 

Stock-based compensation expense

 

6,958

 

28,744

 

Loss from investment in limited partnership

 

40,200

 

45,000

 

Proceeds from sale of loans available-for-sale

 

7,285,804

 

4,905,215

 

Originations of loans available-for-sale

 

(7,300,708

)

(4,630,167

)

Increase in cash surrender value of life insurance

 

(153,264

)

(141,133

)

Net gain on sale of loans

 

(67,896

)

(41,843

)

Net loss on sale of investment securities

 

 

166

 

Net gain on sale of foreclosed assets held-for-sale

 

(142,749

)

(621

)

Net gain on disposal of premises and equipment

 

(73,633

)

(1,560

)

Change in:

 

 

 

 

 

Accrued interest receivable

 

(44,108

)

(631,911

)

Other assets

 

(72,481

)

(235,411

)

Accrued interest payable and other liabilities

 

57,131

 

15,860

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

2,256,911

 

2,235,061

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows from investing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Held-to-maturity securities:

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from maturities, calls and principal pay-downs

 

317,077

 

210,027

 

Available-for-sale securities:

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from sales

 

 

1,537,337

 

Proceeds from maturities, calls and principal pay-downs

 

7,476,006

 

3,247,531

 

Purchases

 

(16,764,629

)

(22,776,490

)

Net (increase) decrease in FHLB stock

 

(356,800

)

69,800

 

Net increase in loans and leases

 

(3,199,446

)

(14,906,819

)

Proceeds from sale of premises and equipment

 

247,008

 

1,560

 

Acquisition of bank premises and equipment

 

(2,111,460

)

(419,654

)

Proceeds from sale of foreclosed assets held-for-sale

 

584,088

 

39,711

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net cash used in investing activities

 

(13,808,156

)

(32,996,997

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows from financing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Net increase in deposits

 

10,996,762

 

43,356,715

 

Net (decrease) increase in short-term borrowings

 

(4,055,067

)

2,886,109

 

Repayments of long-term debt

 

(16,410,688

)

(15,379,437

)

Proceeds from long-term debt advances

 

20,000,000

 

 

Proceeds from employee stock purchase plan

 

67,820

 

48,151

 

Dividends paid, net of dividends reinvested

 

(627,897

)

(615,097

)

Cash payments in lieu of fractional shares on stock dividend

 

 

(7,448

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net cash provided by financing activities

 

9,970,930

 

30,288,993

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents

 

(1,580,315

)

(472,943

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning

 

13,800,848

 

12,594,540

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents, ending

 

$

12,220,533

 

$

12,121,597

 

 

See notes to consolidated financial statements

6




FIDELITY D & D BANCORP, INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(unaudited)

1.      Nature of operations and critical accounting policies

Nature of operations

The Fidelity Deposit and Discount Bank (the Bank) is a commercial bank chartered in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Fidelity D & D Bancorp, Inc. (the Company or collectively, the Company).  Having commenced operations in 1903, the Bank is committed to provide superior customer service, while offering a full range of banking products and financial and trust services, to both our consumer and commercial customers from our main office located in Dunmore and other branches throughout Lackawanna and Luzerne counties.

Principles of consolidation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of the Company and the Bank have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) for interim financial information and with the instructions to this Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X.  Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnote disclosures required by GAAP for complete financial statements.  In the opinion of management, all normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the financial condition and results of operations for the periods have been included.  All significant inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.  Prior period amounts are reclassified when necessary to conform to the current period’s presentation.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reported periods.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.  For additional information and disclosures required under GAAP, refer to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.

Management is responsible for the fairness, integrity and objectivity of the unaudited financial statements included in this report.  Management prepared the unaudited financial statements in accordance with GAAP.  In meeting its responsibility for the financial statements, management depends on the Company’s accounting systems and related internal controls.  These systems and controls are designed to provide reasonable, but not absolute, assurance that the financial records accurately reflect the transactions of the Company, the Company’s assets are safeguarded and that the financial statements present fairly the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

In the opinion of management, the consolidated balance sheets as of June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 and the related consolidated statements of income for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 and changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 present fairly the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  All material adjustments required for a fair presentation have been made.  These adjustments are of a normal recurring nature.

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2006, and the notes included therein, included within the Company’s Annual Report filed on Form 10-K.

Critical accounting policies

The presentation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect many of the reported amounts and disclosures. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

A material estimate that is particularly susceptible to significant change is the determination of the allowance for loan losses (the allowance).  Management believes that the allowance, as of June 30, 2007, is adequate and reasonable.  Given the subjective nature of identifying and valuing loan losses, it is likely that well-informed individuals could make materially different assumptions, and could, therefore, calculate a materially different allowance value.  While management uses available information to recognize losses on loans, changes in economic conditions may necessitate revisions in the future.  In addition, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the Company’s allowance.  Such agencies may require the Company to recognize adjustments to the allowance based on their judgments of information available to them at the time of their examination.

7




Another material estimate is the calculation of fair values of the Company’s investment securities.  The Company receives estimated fair values of investment securities from an independent valuation service.  In developing these fair values, the valuation service uses estimates of cash flows, based on historical performance of similar instruments in similar interest rate environments.  Based on experience, management is aware that estimated fair values of investment securities tend to vary among valuation services.  Accordingly, when selling investment securities, management may obtain price quotes from more than one source.  Available-for-sale (AFS) securities are carried at fair value on the consolidated balance sheet, with unrealized gains and losses, net of income tax, reported separately within shareholders’ equity through accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).

The fair value of residential mortgage loans, classified as AFS, is obtained from the Federal National Mortgage Association or the Pennsylvania Housing Finance Authority.  To determine the fair value of student loans, classified as AFS, the Bank uses the pricing obtained from the most recent student loans sold from its AFS portfolio.  From time-to-time, the Bank may originate Small Business Administration (SBA) loans AFS.  The fair value of SBA loans, classified as AFS, is obtained from an outside pricing source.  The market to which the Bank sells mortgage and other loans is restricted and price quotes from other sources are not typically obtained.  As of June 30, 2007, the AFS loan portfolio consisted of residential mortgages.

2.      Earnings per share

Basic earnings per share (EPS) is computed by dividing income available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common stock outstanding for the period.  Diluted EPS is computed in the same manner as basic EPS but reflects the potential dilution that could occur if stock options to issue additional common stock were exercised, which would then result in additional stock outstanding to share in or dilute the earnings of the Company.  The Company maintains two share-based compensation plans that may generate additional potential dilutive common shares. Generally, dilution would occur if Company-issued stock options were exercised and converted into common stock.

In the computation of diluted EPS, the Company uses the treasury stock method to determine the dilutive effect of its granted but unexercised stock options.  Under this method, the assumed proceeds received from shares issued, in a hypothetical stock option exercise, are assumed to be used to purchase treasury stock.  Pursuant to the guidance of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 128, Earnings Per Share, proceeds include: proceeds from the exercise of outstanding stock options; compensation cost for future service that the Company has not yet recognized; and any “windfall” tax benefits that would be credited directly to shareholders’ equity when the grant generates a tax deduction (or a reduction in proceeds if there is a charge to equity).  For a further discussion on the Company’s stock option plans, see Note 3, below.

The following table illustrates the data used in computing basic EPS and a reconciliation to derive at the components of diluted EPS for the periods indicated:

Six months ended June 30,

 

2007

 

2006

 

Basic EPS:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income available to common shareholders

 

$

2,203,084

 

$

1,970,251

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted-average common shares outstanding

 

2,062,416

 

2,043,865

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic EPS

 

$

1.07

 

$

0.96

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diluted EPS:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income available to common shareholders

 

$

2,203,084

 

$

1,970,251

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted-average common shares outstanding

 

2,062,416

 

2,043,865

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dilutive potential common shares

 

1,080

 

2,024

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted-average common shares and dilutive potential shares

 

2,063,496

 

2,045,889

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diluted EPS

 

$

1.07

 

$

0.96

 

 

8




 

3.      Stock plans

The Company uses the fair value method of accounting for stock-based compensation provided under SFAS 123R, Share Based Payment.  SFAS 123R requires that the cost of share-based payment transactions (including those with employees and non-employees) be recognized in the financial statements.  SFAS 123R applies to all share-based payment transactions in which an entity acquires goods or services by issuing (or offering to issue) its shares, share options, or other equity instruments (except for those held by an ESOP) or by incurring liabilities (1) in amounts based (even in part) on the price of the entity’s shares or other equity instruments, or (2) that require (or may require) settlement by the issuance of an entity’s shares or other equity instruments.

The Company has two stock-based compensation plans (the stock option plans).  The stock option plans were shareholder-approved and permit the grant of share-based compensation awards to its directors, key officers and certain other employees.  The Company believes that these stock option plans better align the interest of its directors, key officers and employees with the interest of its shareholders.  The Company further believes that the granting of share-based awards, under the provisions of the stock option plans, is necessary to retain the knowledge base, continuity and expertise of its directors, key officers and certain employees.

The Company established the 2000 Independent Directors Stock Option Plan and has reserved 55,000 shares of its un-issued capital stock for issuance under the plan.  Under the 2000 Independent Directors Stock Option Plan, each outside director is awarded stock options to purchase 500 shares of the Company’s common stock on the first business day of January, each year, at the fair market value on date of grant.  No stock options were awarded during the first six months of 2007 or for the year ended December 31, 2006, due to the directors’ voluntary election to forego the award.  At June 30, 2007 there were 14,850 unexercised stock options outstanding under this plan.

The Company has also established the 2000 Stock Incentive Plan and has reserved 55,000 shares of its un-issued capital stock for issuance under the plan.  Under the 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, key officers and certain other employees are eligible to be awarded qualified stock options to purchase the Company’s common stock at the fair market value on the date of grant.  No stock options were awarded during the first six months of 2007.  During the first six months of 2006, 2,200 stock options were issued under this plan at a grant-date fair value of $6.21 per share.  The options vest over a six month period and for the six months ended June 30, 2006 approximately $14,000 of stock-based compensation expense was recorded and is included as a component of salaries and employee benefits in the consolidated statements of income.  As of June 30, 2007, there were 5,830 unexercised stock options outstanding under this plan.

In addition to the two stock option plans above, the Company has established the 2002 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the ESPP) and has reserved 110,000 shares of its un-issued capital stock for issuance under the plan.  The plan was designed to promote broad-based employee ownership of the Company’s stock.  Under the 2002 ESPP, employees may have automatic payroll deductions to purchase the Company’s capital stock at a discounted price based on the fair market value of the Company’s capital stock on either the commencement date or termination date.  At June 30, 2007, 8,317 shares have been issued under the ESPP.  The ESPP is considered a compensatory plan and, as such, is required to comply with the provisions of SFAS 123R.  The Company recognizes compensation expense on its ESPP Plan on the date the shares are purchased.  For the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, compensation expense related to the ESPP approximated $7,000 and $15,000, respectively, and is included as a component of salaries and employee benefits in the consolidated statements of income.

4.      Derivative instruments

As part of the Company’s overall interest rate risk management strategy, the Company has adopted a policy whereby the Company may periodically use derivative instruments to minimize significant fluctuations in earnings caused by interest rate volatility.  This interest rate risk management strategy entails the use of interest rate floors, caps and swaps.  During the fourth quarter of 2006, the Company entered into a three-year interest rate floor derivative agreement on $20,000,000 notional value of its prime-based loan portfolio.  The transaction required the payment of a premium by the Company to the seller for the right to receive payments in the event national prime drops below a pre-determined level (strike rate), essentially converting floating rate loans to fixed rate loans when prime drops below the contractual strike rate.  When purchased, the Company recorded an asset representing the fair value of the hedge at the time of purchase.  The Company has designated this agreement as a cash flow hedge pursuant to SFAS No. 133.  Accordingly, the change in the fair value of the instrument related to the hedge’s intrinsic value, or approximately -$29,000, is recorded as a component of other comprehensive income (OCI) in the consolidated statement of changes in shareholders’ equity and the portion of the change in fair value related to the time value expiration, or approximately $74,000, is recorded in the consolidated statements of income as a reduction of interest income for the six months ended June 30, 2007.  No gain or loss has been recognized in earnings due to hedge ineffectiveness as of June 30, 2007.  As of June 30, 2007, the Company does not expect to reclassify any amount from OCI to earnings over the next twelve months and no hedge has been discontinued.  Also, as of June 30, 2007, the fair value of the derivative contract approximated $122,000 and is a component of other assets in the consolidated balance sheet.

9




5.      Recent accounting pronouncements

In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN 48).  FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement 109, Accounting for Income Taxes.  FIN 48 is effective for the year ending December 31, 2007.

The Company adopted FIN 48 during the first quarter of 2007 and has evaluated its material tax positions as of June 30, 2007.  The adoption of FIN 48 does not have an immediate effect on its consolidated financial statements.  Under the “more-likely-than-not” threshold guidelines, the Company believes no significant uncertain tax positions exist, either individually or in the aggregate, that would give rise to the non-recognition of an existing tax benefit.  In periods subsequent to June 30, 2007, determinations of potentially adverse material tax positions will be evaluated to determine whether an uncertain tax position may have previously existed or has been originated.  In the event an adverse tax position is determined to exist, penalty and interest will be accrued, in accordance with the Internal Revenue Service guidelines, and recorded as a component of other expenses in the Company’s consolidated statements of income.

As of June 30, 2007, there were no unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would significantly affect the Company’s effective tax rate.  Also, as of June 30, 2007, there were no penalties and interest recognized in the consolidated statements of income as a result of the adoption of FIN 48, nor does the Company foresee a change in its material tax positions that would give rise to the non-recognition of an existing tax benefit during the forthcoming twelve months.

Item 2:  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following is management’s discussion and analysis of the significant changes in the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of June 30, 2007 compared to December 31, 2006 and the results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006.  Current performance may not be indicative of future results.  This discussion should be read in conjunction with the Company’s 2006 Annual Report filed on Form 10-K.

Forward-looking statements

This Interim Report on Form 10-Q contains a number of forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act.  These statements may be identified by the use of the words “anticipate,” “believe,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “outlook,” “plan,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” “should,” “will,” “would” and similar terms and phrases, including references to assumptions.  Forward-looking statements include risks and uncertainties.

Forward-looking statements are based on various assumptions and analyses made by us in light of management’s experience and its perception of historical trends, current conditions and expected future developments, as well as other factors management believes are appropriate under the circumstances.  These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors (many of which are beyond our control) that could cause actual results to differ materially from future results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.  These factors include, without limitation, the following:

·                  the timing and occurrence or non-occurrence of events may be subject to circumstances beyond our control;

·                  there may be increases in competitive pressure among financial institutions or from non-financial institutions;

·                  changes in the interest rate environment may reduce interest margins;

·                  changes in deposit flows, loan demand or real estate values may adversely affect our business;

·                  changes in accounting principles, policies or guidelines may cause our financial condition to be perceived differently;

10




·                  general economic conditions, either nationally or locally in some or all areas in which we do business, or conditions in the securities markets or the banking industry may be less favorable than we currently anticipate;

·                  legislative or regulatory changes may adversely affect our business;

·                  technological changes may be more rapid, difficult or expensive than we anticipate;

·                  success or consummation of new business initiatives may be more difficult or expensive than we anticipate;

·                  acts of war or terrorism; or

·                  natural disaster.

Management cautions readers not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which reflect analyses only as of the date of this document.  We have no obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this document.

Readers should review the risk factors described in other documents that we file or furnish, from time to time, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including Annual Reports to Shareholders, Annual Reports filed on Form 10-K and other current reports filed or furnished on Form 8-K.

General

The Company’s principal revenues are derived from interest, dividends and fees earned on its interest-earning assets, which are comprised of loans, securities and other short-term investments.  The Company’s principal expenses consist of interest paid on its interest-bearing liabilities, which are comprised of deposits, short- and long-term borrowings and operating and general expenses.  The Company’s profitability depends primarily on its net interest income. Net interest income is the difference between interest income and interest expense.  Interest income is generated from yields on interest-earning assets which consist principally of loans and investment securities. Interest expense is incurred from rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities, which consist of deposits and borrowings. Net interest income is dependent upon the interest-rate spread (i.e., the difference between the yields earned on its interest-earning assets and the rates paid on its interest-bearing liabilities) and the relative amounts of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities.  The interest rate spread is significantly impacted by: changes in interest rates and market yield curves and their related impact on cash flows; the composition and characteristics of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities; differences in the maturity and re-pricing characteristics of assets compared to the maturity and re-pricing characteristics of the liabilities that fund them and by the competition in our marketplace.

The Company’s profitability is also affected by the level of its non-interest income and expenses, provision for loan losses and provision for income taxes.  Non-interest income consists mostly of service charges on the Bank’s loan and deposit products, trust and asset management service fees, increases in the cash surrender value of the bank owned life insurance (BOLI), net gains or losses from sales of loans and securities AFS and from the sales of other real estate (ORE) properties.  Non-interest expense consists of compensation and related employee benefit expenses, occupancy, equipment, data processing, advertising, marketing, professional fees, insurance and other operating overhead.

The Company’s profitability is significantly affected by general economic and competitive conditions, changes in market interest rates, government policies and actions of regulatory authorities.  The Company’s loan portfolio is comprised principally of commercial and commercial real estate loans.  The properties underlying the Company’s mortgages are concentrated in Northeastern Pennsylvania.  Credit risk, which represents the possibility of the Company not recovering amounts due from its borrowers, is significantly related to local economic conditions in the areas the properties are located as well as the Company’s underwriting standards.  Economic conditions affect the market value of the underlying collateral as well as the levels of adequate cash flow and revenue generation from income-producing commercial and multi-family properties.

11




COMPARISON OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2007 AND JUNE 30, 2006

Overview

Net income for the second quarter of 2007 was $1,159,000, or a 23% increase compared to $939,000 recorded in the same quarter in 2006.  Diluted earnings per share were $0.56 and $0.45 for each of the respective periods.  For the six months ended June 30, 2007, net income was $2,203,000, or $1.07 per share compared to $1,970,000, or $0.96 per share for the six months ended June 30, 2006.  The increase in net income for both the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2007, compared to the prior year periods, was the result of increases in net interest income, non-interest income and a decrease in the provision for loan losses, partially offset by increases in non-interest expense and the provision for income taxes.

The increases in net income was the primary cause of the improvement in return on average assets (ROA) and return on average shareholders’ equity (ROE) to 0.82% and 8.79%, respectively, for the three months ended June 30, 2007 compared to 0.66% and 7.66%, respectively, for the same period in 2006.  For the six months ended June 30, 2007, ROA and ROE were 0.78% and 8.46% compared to 0.70% and 8.08% for the first half of 2006.

Net interest income and interest sensitive assets / liabilities

Net interest income increased $57,000 to $4,322,000 for the second quarter of 2007, from $4,265,000 recorded in the same period of 2006.  The increase was partially due to the restoration of some large commercial loans from non-performing to performing status during the second half of 2006.  During the second quarter of 2007, the yield on the commercial loan portfolio increased 29 basis points compared to the second quarter of 2006.  In addition, all other categories of earning assets were either originated or re-priced at higher rates in the second quarter of 2007 compared to the second quarter of 2006.  Compared to the second quarter of 2006, the yield on interest-earning assets increased 32 basis points during the second 2007 quarter.  As a result, total interest income increased $313,000, or 4%, during the three months ended June 30, 2007, compared to the three months ended June 30, 2006.  Partially offsetting the effect interest rates had on interest-earning assets was an increase in interest expense of $256,000, or 6%, caused mostly by increases in rates paid on interest-bearing deposits.  The blended rate paid on all interest-bearing deposits increased 48 basis points in the current year quarter compared to the comparative quarter of 2006.  The increase in rates paid was due to deposit-gathering strategies and competitive pressure in conjunction with the prolonged inverted-shaped interest rate yield curve.  The average balance of total interest-bearing deposits increased $6,800,000 during the second quarter of 2007 compared to the same quarter of 2006 and is also $4,200,000 higher on average than the average for the full year 2006.  The Bank will continue its quest to raise deposit levels and reduce its dependency on borrowings.  Interest expense on borrowings and repurchase agreements declined $216,000 in the second quarter of 2007, compared to the second quarter of 2006, due mostly to an $18,500,000 decline in the average balances.

During the second quarter of 2007, the Bank’s tax-equivalent margin and spread were 3.34% and 2.63%, respectively, compared to 3.26% and 2.64% during the second quarter of 2006.  The decline in spread was from interest costs outpacing the yields earned on assets.  The eight basis point improvement in margin is from higher net interest income on a lower level of interest-earning assets in the second quarter of 2007 compared to the second quarter of 2006.

Similar to the second quarter comparisons, the Bank’s tax-equivalent margin and spread for the six months ended June 30, 2007 were 3.35% and 2.65%, respectively, compared to 3.30% and 2.70% during the same period for 2006.  The decline in spread was from interest costs outpacing the yields earned on assets.  The cost of interest-bearing deposits increased 67 basis points during the first half of 2007 compared to the first half of 2006.  However, success in deposit gathering strategies has resulted in a $15,700,000 increase in average balances of interest-bearing deposits and enabled the Bank to reduce its position on high-cost borrowings by $22,600,000 on average.  As a result, interest expense increased $921,000, or 12%, for the six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2006.  Offsetting the increase in interest expense was an increase in interest income of $1,052,000, or 6%, for the comparable periods.  The migration of the large commercial loans to performing status as well as higher earning rates in the other loan categories and the investment portfolio helped increase the yield on interest-earning assets by 42 basis points during the first half of 2007 compared to the same 2006 period.  The five basis point improvement in the tax-equivalent margin is from higher net interest income which increased $131,000, or 2%, compared to the first half of 2006, on a similar level of interest-earning assets during the first half of 2007.

The interest rate environment has improved slightly during the past several months, but continues to remain challenging.  The yield curve which has recently become positively sloped still remains relatively flat, thereby limiting profitable growth opportunities.  The more positively-shaped yield curve and our successful deposit gathering strategies, debt reduction, and improved credit quality of the Bank’s earning assets will help position the Bank to optimize net interest income during this challenging rate environment and should be further enhanced when the shape of the yield curve returns to a steeper, more positive, normal slope.

12




The following tables set forth, a comparison of average balance sheet amounts and their corresponding fully tax-equivalent (FTE) interest income and expense and annualized tax-equivalent yield and cost for the periods indicated (dollars in thousands):

 

 

Three months ended

 

Six months ended

 

Year ended

 

 

 

June 30,

 

June 30,

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2007

 

2006

 

2007

 

2006

 

2006

 

Average interest-earning assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loans and leases

 

$

420,551

 

$

420,394

 

$

422,952

 

$

417,403

 

$

418,390

 

Investments

 

114,561

 

122,582

 

109,569

 

118,340

 

115,319

 

Federal funds sold

 

15

 

56

 

2,085

 

1,720

 

2,479

 

Interest-bearing deposits

 

190

 

203

 

201

 

241

 

240

 

Total

 

$

535,317

 

$

543,235

 

$

534,807

 

$

537,704

 

$

536,428

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average interest-bearing liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other interest-bearing deposits

 

$

196,513

 

$

184,461

 

$

198,328

 

$

178,658

 

$

185,786

 

Certificates of deposit

 

147,909

 

153,192

 

151,305

 

155,319

 

154,474

 

Borrowed funds

 

76,868

 

89,684

 

72,158

 

88,421

 

79,627

 

Repurchase agreements

 

18,336

 

24,042

 

18,106

 

24,414

 

23,391

 

Total

 

$

439,626

 

$

451,379

 

$

439,897

 

$

446,812

 

$

443,278

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest income (FTE):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loans and leases

 

$

7,321

 

$

7,064

 

$

14,662

 

$

13,763

 

$

28,357

 

Investments

 

1,494

 

1,454

 

2,856

 

2,760

 

5,612

 

Federal funds sold

 

1

 

1

 

55

 

36

 

123

 

Interest-bearing deposits

 

2

 

2

 

5

 

5

 

9

 

Total

 

$

8,818

 

$

8,521

 

$

17,578

 

$

16,564

 

$

34,101

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other interest-bearing deposits

 

$

1,554

 

$

1,324

 

$

3,184

 

$

2,374

 

$

5,467

 

Certificates of deposit

 

1,667

 

1,426

 

3,372

 

2,773

 

6,026

 

Borrowed funds

 

1,024

 

1,193

 

1,902

 

2,323

 

4,244

 

Repurchase agreements

 

116

 

163

 

231

 

299

 

624

 

Total

 

$

4,361

 

$

4,106

 

$

8,689

 

$

7,769

 

$

16,361

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net interest income (FTE)

 

$

4,457

 

$

4,415

 

$

8,889

 

$

8,795

 

$

17,740

 

 

13




 

 

 

Three months ended

 

Six months ended

 

Year ended

 

 

 

June 30,

 

June 30,

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2007

 

2006

 

2007

 

2006

 

2006

 

Yield on average interest-earning assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loans and leases

 

6.98

%

6.74

%

6.99

%

6.65

%

6.78

%

Investments

 

5.23

%

4.76

%

5.26

%

4.70

%

4.87

%

Federal funds sold

 

5.28

%

4.56

%

5.29

%

4.23

%

4.97

%

Interest-bearing deposits

 

4.07

%

4.42

%

4.75

%

3.99

%

3.82

%

Total

 

6.61

%

6.29

%

6.63

%

6.21

%

6.36

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rates on average interest-bearing liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other interest-bearing deposits

 

3.17

%

2.88

%

3.24

%

2.68

%

2.94

%

Certificates of deposit

 

4.52

%

3.73

%

4.49

%

3.60

%

3.90

%

Borrowed funds

 

5.34

%

5.33

%

5.31

%

5.30

%

5.33

%

Repurchase agreements

 

2.53

%

2.73

%

2.57

%

2.47

%

2.67

%

Total

 

3.98

%

3.65

%

3.98

%

3.51

%

3.69

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net interest spread

 

2.63

%

2.64

%

2.65

%

2.70

%

2.67

%

Net interest margin

 

3.34

%

3.26

%

3.35

%

3.30

%

3.31

%

 

In the tables above, interest income was adjusted to a tax-equivalent basis to recognize the income from the various tax-exempt assets as if the interest was fully taxable.  This treatment allows a uniform comparison among the yields on interest-earning assets.  The calculations were computed on a fully tax-equivalent basis using the corporate federal tax rate of 34%.  Net interest spread represents the difference between the yield on interest-earning assets and the rate on interest-bearing liabilities.  Net interest margin represents the ratio of net interest income to total average interest-earning assets.

Provision for loan losses

The provision for loan losses represents the necessary amount to charge against current earnings, the purpose of which is to increase the allowance for loan losses to a level that represents management’s best estimate of known and inherent losses in the Bank’s loan and lease portfolio.  Loans and leases determined to be uncollectible are charged off against the allowance for loan losses.

The required amount of the provision for loan losses, based upon the adequate level of the allowance for loan losses, is subject to ongoing analysis of the loan portfolio.  The Bank’s Special Asset Committee meets periodically to review problem loans and leases.  The committee is comprised of Bank management, including the chief risk officer, loan workout officers and collection personnel.  The committee reports quarterly to the Credit Administration Committee of the Board of Directors.

Management continuously reviews the risks inherent in the loan and lease portfolio.  Specific factors used to evaluate the adequacy of the loan loss provision during the formal process include:

·                  Specific loans that could have loss potential

·                  Levels of and trends in delinquencies and non-accrual loans

·                  Levels of and trends in charge-offs and recoveries

·                  Trends in volume and terms of loans

·                  Changes in risk selection and underwriting standards

·                  Changes in lending policies, procedures and practices

·                  Experience, ability and depth of lending management

·                  National and local economic trends and conditions

·                  Changes in credit concentrations

No provision for loan losses has been recorded during 2007.  The Bank’s non-performing loans, which consists of loans past due 90 days or more plus non-accruing loans, increased $1,060,000, or 31%, to $4,498,000 since December 31, 2006.  However, non-performing loans declined year-to-year by $3,252,000, or 42%, from $7,750,000 at June 30, 2006.  The non-accrual component of non-performing loans showed a $3,109,000 decline while the 90 day delinquencies showed a $143,000 decline in the same period.  The decrease from June 30, 2006 was mainly attributable to the collection and pay-offs of

14




non-performing loans.  The increase from December 31, 2006 was due mainly to commercial loan relationships that had migrated to delinquent status and were placed on non-accrual.  Because there is sufficient collateral that secured these loans, there have been fewer charge-offs, mild loan growth and the allowance for loan losses is deemed to be adequate to absorb the potential for future losses on existing problem loans, no provision for loan losses was required during the first half of 2007.  This compares with $175,000 and $250,000 recorded during the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2006.  After taking into account charge-offs and recoveries, the allowance was $5,295,000 at June 30, 2007 compared to $5,738,000 at June 30, 2006.

Other income

Total other (non-interest) income improved $245,000, or 23%, for the three months ended June 30, 2007 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2006.  The Bank recognized net gains of $127,000 from sales of foreclosed properties and experienced growth in deposit fees revenue of $127,000.  The gain from the sale of foreclosed properties was the result of excess collateral value compared to the net book value of sold foreclosed property.  The increase in deposit fees was caused by growth in debit card interchange and overdraft charges.

For the six months ended June 30, 2007 other income increased $330,000, or 15%, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2006.  Contributing to the increase were growth in deposit fees, gains from sales of foreclosed properties and a first quarter 2007 gain from the sale of an owned commercial facility previously leased to a non-related third party.

Other operating expenses

For the second quarter ended June 30, 2007, other (non-interest) expenses increased $139,000, or 4%, compared to the same 2006 quarter.  Salaries and related employee benefits increased $191,000, or 10%, due to annual merit pay increases, more full-time equivalent employees and interim recognition of performance-based incentives.  The $39,000 decline in premises and equipment was due to less equipment related maintenance costs required in 2007 compared to 2006.  Advertising expense increased $24,000 during the quarter ended June 30, 2007 compared to the quarter ended June 30, 2006, with the grand opening and relocation project of one branch office.  The $36,000 decline in the other component of other operating expenses was caused mostly by reductions in professional fees and the Bank’s FDIC assessment.

For the six months ended June 30, 2007, other expenses increased $330,000, or 4%, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2006.  Salary and related employee benefits increased $319,000, or 8%, due to pay increases and performance-based incentives.  Advertising increased $54,000, or 19%, during the period caused principally by the aforementioned activities associated with the branch relocation project and a winter deposit-gathering campaign earlier this year.

Income tax provision

Compared to 2006, income before provision for income taxes for the second quarter and first six months of 2007 increased $338,000 and $381,000, respectively.  The effective federal income tax rate was 25.9% and 25.8% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, compared to 23.5% and 23.9% for each of the respective 2006 periods.  The effective tax rate increase is attributable to higher pre-tax earnings and a decrease in tax-free interest income from municipal securities and tax-free loans, partially offset by an increase in the tax-free earnings from the BOLI, collectively representing a smaller portion of pre-tax earnings.

COMPARISON OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AT

JUNE 30, 2007 AND DECEMBER 31, 2006

Overview

Consolidated assets increased $11,174,000, or 2%, during the six months ended June 30, 2007.  The net asset increase in total assets was due to increases in total deposits of $11,000,000 and shareholders’ equity of $587,000 partially offset by a net reduction in borrowings of $466,000.

Investment securities

At the time of purchase, the Bank classifies investment securities into one of three categories: trading, AFS or held-to- maturity (HTM).  To date, management has not purchased any securities for trading purposes.  Management classifies most securities as AFS even though it has no immediate intent to sell them.  The AFS designation affords management the flexibility to sell securities and adjust the balance sheet in response to capital levels, liquidity needs, structuring strategies and/or changes in market conditions.  Securities AFS are carried at net fair market value in the consolidated balance sheet

15




with an adjustment to stockholders’ equity, net of tax, which is presented under the caption “Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).”  Securities designated as HTM are carried at amortized cost.

At June 30, 2007, the carrying value of investment securities totaled $107,965,000, or 19% of total assets compared to $100,411,000, or 18% of total assets at December 31, 2006.  Also as of June 30, 2007, approximately 46% of the carrying value of the investment portfolio was comprised of mortgage-backed securities that amortize and provide monthly cash flow.  Agency, corporate and municipal bonds comprised 30%, 12% and 11%, respectively, of the investment portfolio at June 30, 2007.

As illustrated in the following table of amortized cost and fair market value of investment securities, the portfolio is comprised of HTM and AFS securities with carrying values of $1,252,000 and $106,713,000, respectively.  At June 30, 2007, the AFS debt securities were recorded with a net unrealized loss in the amount of $3,231,000 and equity securities were recorded with an unrealized gain of $201,000 (dollars in thousands):

 

 

Amortized

 

Gross unrealized

 

Gross unrealized

 

Fair

 

 

 

cost

 

gains

 

losses

 

value

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Held-to-maturity securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mortgage-backed securities

 

$

1,252

 

$

14

 

$

1

 

$

1,265

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Available-for-sale securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. government agencies and corporations

 

$

33,162

 

$

 

$

1,057

 

$

32,105

 

Obligations of states and political subdivisions

 

12,286

 

1

 

200

 

12,087

 

Corporate bonds

 

13,209

 

42

 

28

 

13,223

 

Mortgage-backed securities

 

50,807

 

 

1,989

 

48,818

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total debt securities

 

109,464

 

43

 

3,274

 

106,233

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity securities

 

279

 

201

 

 

480

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total available-for-sale

 

$

109,743

 

$

244

 

$

3,274

 

$

106,713

 

 

16




The amortized cost and fair value of debt securities at June 30, 2007 by contractual maturity are as follows (dollars in thousands):

 

Amortized
cost

 

Market
value

 

Held-to-maturity securities:

 

 

 

 

 

Mortgage-backed securities

 

$

1,252

 

$

1,265

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Available-for-sale securities:

 

 

 

 

 

Debt securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Due in one year or less

 

$

1,000

 

$

985

 

Due after one year through five years

 

5,998

 

5,900

 

Due after five years through ten years

 

19,391

 

18,958

 

Due after ten years

 

32,268

 

31,572

 

Total debt securities

 

58,657

 

57,415

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mortgage-backed securities

 

50,807

 

48,818

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total available-for-sale debt securities

 

$

109,464

 

$

106,233

 

 

Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because issuers and borrowers may have the right to call or repay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalty.  Federal agency and municipal securities are included based on their original stated maturity.  Mortgage-backed securities, which are based on weighted-average lives and subject to monthly principal pay-downs, are listed in total.

Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment on a quarterly basis or more frequently when economic conditions or market conditions warrant such evaluation.  Consideration is given to (1) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, and (3) the intent and ability of the Company to retain its investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value.

At June 30, 2007, the AFS debt securities portfolio was carried at a net unrealized loss of $3,231,000 compared to a net unrealized loss of $1,656,000 at December 31, 2006, or a deterioration of $1,575,000.  A large portion of the unrealized losses was for a continuous period of more than 12 months.  Management believes the cause of these unrealized losses is directly related to changes in market interest rates.  As of June 30, 2007, however, most all of the deterioration of the AFS debt portfolio is from investments that are guaranteed by the U.S. government or one of its agencies.  In analyzing an issuer’s financial condition, management considers whether the securities are issued by the U.S. government, its agencies or other governments, whether downgrades by bond rating agencies have occurred and, if necessary, reviews of the issuer’s financial condition.  Because the decline in market values is attributable to changes in interest rates and not credit quality, and the Company has the ability and intent to hold those securities until recovery of fair value, which may be maturity, management views these unrealized losses to be temporary.

Excluding the net unrealized loss, the investment portfolio grew $9,121,000, or 9%, during the first six months of 2007.  The Company utilized growth in deposits to grow the portfolio as well as to reduce short-term borrowings. The current interest rate environment, essentially a sustained period of yield curve inversion, continues to preclude structured investment portfolio growth.  As such, the Company will attempt to replace investment securities that mature, pay-down, are called or amortize with bonds that provide incremental earnings above the Bank’s funding sources.  In addition, cash flows from investments may be used to repay debt and fund growth in the loan portfolio.

Loans available-for-sale (AFS)

Generally, upon origination, certain residential mortgages, the guaranteed portions of Small Business Administration loans and student loans are classified as AFS.  In the event of market rate increases, fixed-rate loans and loans not immediately scheduled to re-price would no longer produce yields consistent with the current market.  In a declining interest rate environment, the Bank would be exposed to prepayment risk and, as rates on adjustable rate loans decrease, interest income would be negatively affected.  To better manage prepayment and interest rate risk, loans that meet these conditions may be considered for sale in the secondary market.  Consideration is also given to the Company’s current liquidity position and

17




expected future liquidity needs.  Loans AFS are carried at the lower of cost or estimated fair value.  If the fair values of these loans fall below their amortized cost, the difference is written down and charged to current earnings.  Subsequent appreciation in the portfolio, if any, is credited to current earnings but only to the extent of previous write-downs.

At June 30, 2007, loans AFS amounted to $205,000 with a corresponding fair value of $209,000, compared to $122,000 and $123,000, respectively, at December 31, 2006.  During the second quarter of 2007, residential mortgage and student loans with principal balances of $3,251,000 were sold into the secondary market with combined net gains of approximately $31,000 recognized.

Loans and leases

The Bank originates commercial and industrial (commercial) and commercial real estate loans, residential, consumer, home equity and construction loans.  The relative volume of originations is dependent upon customer demand, current interest rates and the perception and duration of future interest levels.  The Bank continues to focus its efforts on the expansion of variable-rate commercial loan portfolios and origination of residential mortgage and consumer loans.  The broad spectrum of products provides diversification which helps manage, to an extent, interest rate risk and credit concentration risk.  Credit risk is further managed through underwriting policies and procedures and loan monitoring practices.  Interest rate risk is managed using various asset/liability modeling techniques and analyses.  The interest rates on most commercial loans are adjustable with reset intervals of five years or less.

The majority of our loan portfolio is collateralized, at least in part, by real estate in the greater Lackawanna and Luzerne Counties of Pennsylvania.  Commercial lending activities generally involve a greater degree of credit risk than residential lending because they typically have larger balances and are more affected by adverse conditions in the economy.  Because payments on commercial loans depend upon the successful operation and management of the properties and the businesses which operate from within them, repayment of such loans may be affected by factors outside the borrower’s control.  Such factors may include adverse conditions in the real estate market, the economy, the industry or changes in government regulations.  As such, commercial loans require more ongoing evaluation and monitoring which occurs with the Bank’s credit administration and outsourced loan review functions.

Gross loans increased $2,805,000, or 0.7% to $425,448,000 at June 30, 2007 compared to $422,643,000 at December 31, 2006.  The increase in consumer and home equity loans is from the successful sales campaign for home equity loans during the current year second quarter.  The composition of the loan portfolio at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, is summarized as follows:

 

June 30, 2007

 

December 31, 2006

 

 

 

Amount

 

%

 

Amount

 

%

 

Commercial and commercial real estate

 

$

218,439,536

 

51.3

 

$

218,213,216

 

51.6

 

Residential real estate

 

115,965,734

 

27.3

 

112,742,692

 

26.7

 

Consumer and home equity

 

79,028,349

 

18.6

 

77,729,520

 

18.4

 

Real estate construction

 

11,464,265

 

2.7

 

13,369,712

 

3.2

 

Direct financing leases

 

550,147

 

0.1

 

588,211

 

0.1

 

Gross loans

 

425,448,031

 

100.0

 

422,643,351

 

100.0

 

Allowance for loan losses

 

(5,294,537

)

 

 

(5,444,303

)

 

 

Net loans

 

$

420,153,494

 

 

 

$

417,199,048

 

 

 

 

18




Allowance for loan losses

Management continually evaluates the credit quality of the Bank’s loan and lease portfolio and performs a formal review of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses (the allowance) on a quarterly basis.  The allowance reflects management’s best estimate of the amount of credit losses in the loan portfolio.  Management’s judgment is based on the evaluation of individual loans, past experience, the assessment of current economic conditions and other relevant factors including the amounts and timing of cash flows expected to be received on impaired loans.  Those estimates may be susceptible to significant change.  The provision for loan losses represents the amount necessary to maintain an appropriate allowance.  Loan losses are charged directly against the allowance when loans are deemed to be uncollectible.  Recoveries from previously charged-off loans are added to the allowance when received.

Management applies two primary components during the loan review process to determine proper allowance levels.  The two levels are specific loan loss allocation for loans that are deemed impaired and a general loan loss allocation for those loans not specifically allocated.  The methodology to analyze the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses is as follows:

·                  Identification of specific problem loans by loan category;

·                  Calculation of specific allowances required based on collateral and objective and quantifiable evidence;

·                  Determination of homogenous pools by loan category and eliminating loans with specific allocations;

·                  Application of historical loss percentages (five-year average) to pools to determine the allowance allocation; and

·                  Application of qualitative factor adjustment percentages to historical losses for trends or changes in the loan portfolio.

Allocation of the allowance for different categories of loans is based on the methodology as explained above.  A key element of the methodology to determine the allowance is the Company’s credit risk evaluation process, which includes credit risk grading of individual commercial loans.  Commercial loans are assigned credit risk grades based on the Company’s assessment of conditions that affect the borrower’s ability to meet its contractual obligations under the loan agreement.  That process includes reviewing borrowers’ current financial information, historical payment experience, credit documentation, public information and other information specific to each individual borrower.  The changes in the allocations from period to period are based upon the credit risk grading assigned from periodic reviews of the loan and lease portfolios.

Net charge-offs for the six months ended June 30, 2007 were $150,000, compared to $496,000 for the same period in 2006.  Net charge-offs of commercial loans were $30,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to net charge-offs of $311,000 for the same six month period of 2006.  Real estate loans had net recoveries of $12,000 in the first six months of 2007 as compared to net charge-offs of $32,000 in the first six months of 2006.  Consumer loan net charge-offs were $132,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2007 as compared to $154,000 for the same period of 2006.  There were no lease financing charge-offs.

Management believes that the current balance in the allowance for loans losses of $5,295,000 is sufficient to withstand the identified potential credit quality issues that may arise and are inherent to the portfolio.  Currently, management is unaware of any potential problem loans that have not been reviewed.  Potential problem loans are those where there is known information that leads management to believe repayment of principal and/or interest is in jeopardy and the loans are neither on non-accrual status nor past due 90 days or more.  However, there could be instances which become identified over the year that may require additional charge-offs and/or increases to the allowance.  The ratio of allowance for loan losses to total loans was 1.24% at June 30, 2007 compared to 1.29% at December 31, 2006 and 1.36% at June 30, 2006.

19




The following tables set forth the activity in the allowance for loan losses and certain key ratios for the period indicated:

 

 

As of and for the

 

As of and for the

 

As of and for the

 

 

 

six months ended

 

twelve months ended

 

six months ended

 

 

 

June 30, 2007

 

December 31, 2006

 

June 30, 2006

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at beginning of period

 

$

5,444,303

 

$

5,984,649

 

$

5,984,649

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Provision charged to operations

 

 

325,000

 

250,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Charge-offs:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial

 

41,942

 

660,471

 

350,133

 

Residential real estate

 

1,586

 

109,164

 

31,626

 

Consumer

 

146,986

 

285,379

 

195,636

 

Lease financing

 

 

 

 

Total

 

190,514

 

1,055,014

 

577,395

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Recoveries:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial

 

12,415

 

64,173

 

39,197

 

Residential real estate

 

13,603

 

532

 

60

 

Consumer

 

14,730

 

124,763

 

41,759

 

Lease financing

 

 

200

 

200

 

Total

 

40,748

 

189,668

 

81,216

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net charge-offs

 

149,766

 

865,346

 

496,179

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at end of period

 

$

5,294,537

 

$

5,444,303

 

$

5,738,470

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total loans, end of period

 

$

425,652,831

 

$

422,765,351

 

$

423,465,087

 

 

 

 

As of and for the

 

As of and for the

 

As of and for the

 

 

 

six months ended

 

twelve months ended

 

six months ended

 

 

 

June 30, 2007

 

December 31, 2006

 

June 30, 2006

 

Net charge-offs to:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loans, end of period

 

0.04

%

0.20

%

0.12

%

Allowance for loan losses

 

2.83

%

15.89

%

8.65

%

Provisions for loan losses

 

x

2.66

x

1.98

x

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Allowance for loan losses to:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total loans

 

1.24

%

1.29

%

1.36

%

Non-accrual loans

 

1.21

x

1.62

x

0.77

x

Non-performing loans

 

1.18

x

1.58

x

0.74

x

Net charge-offs

 

35.35

x

6.29

x

11.57

x

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loans 30-89 days past due and still accruing

 

$

6,596,917

 

$

2,570,825

 

$

3,696,924

 

Loans 90 days past due and accruing

 

$

134,485

 

$

80,603

 

$

277,250

 

Non-accrual loans

 

$

4,363,589

 

$

3,357,718

 

$

7,472,830

 

Allowance for loan losses to loans 90 days or more past due and accruing

 

39.37

x

67.54

x

20.70

x

 

20




The $6,597,000 of loans in the 30-89 days past due category as of  June 30, 2007 consists of  a few relationships that migrated beyond the 30 days, but continue to make current payments although not in amounts sufficient to bring them to fully current status.  Of this amount, $1,000,000 was brought fully current subsequent to the quarter end.  The remainder are expected to be resolved in the third quarter.  The larger, problematic loans that entered into this category of delinquencies had been reflected in the allowance for loan loss allocation either through the general loan loss allocation, a specific reserve or through the qualitative factor adjustments.  Management believes the allocation of the allowance for loan losses on these loans is adequate to absorb the potential for losses and therefore did not require additional loan loss provisions.

Non-performing assets

The Bank defines non-performing assets as accruing loans past due 90 days or more, non-accrual loans, restructured loans, other real estate owned and repossessed assets.  As of June 30, 2007, non-performing assets represented 0.78% of total assets compared to 0.65% at December 31, 2006 and 1.36% at June 30, 2006.

The non-accrual loans increased by a net $1,006,000 during the first six months of 2007 to $4,364,000 at June 30, 2007.  Additions to the non-accrual loans component of the non-performing assets totaling $2,107,000 occurred during the first six months of 2007 as a few commercial loan relationships migrated to delinquent status and were placed on non-accrual.  These additions were partially offset by payoffs or pay downs of $591,000, $146,000 of loans returned to accruing status, charge-offs of $119,000 and $245,000 of loans that were transferred to other real estate owned.  The Bank’s Special Assets Committee has reviewed these loans and found the collateral to be adequate or made reserve allocations where deemed appropriate.

At June 30, 2007 the 90-day past due loans that were still accruing totaled $134,000, compared to $81,000 at December 31, 2006 and $277,000 at June 30, 2006.

There were no repossessed assets or other real estate owned at June 30, 2007.  All previously held real estate owned was sold.

Non-performing loans were $4,498,000 at June 30, 2007, an increase of $1,060,000 from year-end 2006, but a decline of $3,252,000 compared to June 30, 2006.  Declines occurred in the three portfolios: commercial loans, real estate and consumer.  The Special Assets Department had developed specific action plans for each of the Company’s non-performing loans and completed several of them.  The ratio of non-accrual loans to net loans was 1.04%, at June 30, 2007 compared to 1.79% at June 30, 2006.  It was up slightly from the year-end ratio of 0.80%.  At June 30, 2007, the ratio of non-performing loans to net loans was 1.07% compared to 0.82% at December 31, 2006 and 1.85% at June 30, 2006.  The ratio of non-performing assets to total assets was 0.78% at June 30, 2007 and 0.65% at December 31, 2006, both down from 1.36% at June 30, 2006.

The following table sets forth non-performing assets data as of the period indicated:

 

June 30, 2007

 

December 31, 2006

 

June 30, 2006

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loans past due 90 days or more and accruing

 

$

134,485

 

$

80,603

 

$

277,250

 

Non-accrual loans

 

4,363,589

 

3,357,718

 

7,472,830

 

Total non-performing loans

 

4,498,074

 

3,438,321

 

7,750,080

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Restructured loans

 

 

 

 

Other real estate owned

 

 

197,149

 

53,099

 

Repossessed assets

 

 

 

 

Total non-performing assets

 

$

4,498,074

 

$

3,635,470

 

$

7,803,179

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loans including AFS

 

$

420,358,294

 

$

417,321,048

 

$

417,921,996

 

Total assets

 

$

573,492,468

 

$

562,317,988

 

$

575,128,225

 

Non-accrual loans to net loans

 

1.04

%

0.80

%

1.79

%

Non-performing assets to net loans, foreclosed real estate and repossessed assets

 

1.07

%

0.87

%

1.87

%

Non-performing assets to total assets

 

0.78

%

0.65

%

1.36

%

Non-performing loans to net loans

 

1.07

%

0.82

%

1.85

%

 

21




Bank premises and equipment, net

Bank premises and equipment increased $2,007,000, or 18%, since December 31, 2006.  The increase was due mostly to the transfer of capitalized costs from other assets and current year capital expenditures, both in conjunction with the completion of the Company’s branch relocation project.  These items were partially offset by the sale and disposal of property and equipment including the sale of an owned commercial facility previously leased to a non-related third party.

Other assets

The decrease in other assets of $200,000, or 4%, from December 31, 2006 to June 30, 2007 was principally due to the net reduction of $681,000 in capitalized costs that were transferred to bank premises and equipment in conjunction with the completion of the Company’s branch relocation project.  This was partially offset by an increase in deferred tax assets related to the increase in the unrealized loss within the Company’s AFS investment portfolio.

Deposits

The Bank is a community-based commercial financial institution that offers a variety of deposit accounts with a range of interest rates and terms.  Deposit products include passbook and statement savings accounts, interest-bearing checking (NOW), money market, non-interest bearing, or demand deposit accounts (DDAs), and certificates of deposit accounts.  The flow of deposits is significantly influenced by general economic conditions, changes in prevailing interest rates, pricing and competition.  Most of the Bank’s deposits are obtained from the communities surrounding its 12 branch offices.  The Bank attempts to attract and retain deposit customers via sales and marketing efforts with new products, quality service, competitive rates, and maintaining long-standing customer relationships.  To determine deposit product interest rates, the Bank considers local competition, market yields and the rates charged for alternative sources of funding such as borrowings.  To be competitive in our markets and continue to bolster our deposit base, we have increased rates on most deposit products; however, we have not increased rates above market rates, as we only consider cost effective rate-setting tactics in all interest rate environments.

Compared to December 31, 2006 total deposits increased $10,997,000, or 3%, during the six months ended June 30, 2007.  The growth in total deposits was primarily due to increases in certificates of deposit and money market accounts partially offset by reductions in NOW, savings and DDAs.  The growth in the certificates of deposits was due to increases in the public fund sector which was largely offset by a decline in the NOW public fund accounts.  The increase in money market accounts of $9,781,000, or 14%, was due to the continued success in deposit-gathering strategies in conjunction with increased promotional interest rates, partially offset by a decrease in savings accounts.  The decline in DDAs was primarily from a decrease in official checks outstanding.

The following table represents the major components of deposits as of June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006:

 

June 30, 2007

 

December 31, 2006

 

 

 

Amount

 

%

 

Amount

 

%

 

Money market

 

$

82,140,255

 

19.5

 

$

72,359,157

 

17.6

 

NOW

 

60,843,396

 

14.4

 

65,121,770

 

15.9

 

Savings and club

 

43,223,666

 

10.3

 

45,300,838

 

11.0

 

Certificates of deposit

 

163,056,424

 

38.7

 

153,810,855

 

37.5

 

Total interest-bearing

 

349,263,741

 

82.9

 

336,592,620

 

82.0

 

Non-interest-bearing

 

72,067,616

 

17.1

 

73,741,975

 

18.0

 

Total deposits

 

$

421,331,357

 

100.0

 

$

410,334,595

 

100.0

 

 

Certificates of deposit of $100,000 or more aggregated $70,318,000 and $63,020,000 at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively.

Borrowings

Borrowings are used as a complement to deposit generation as an alternative funding source whereby the Bank will borrow under customer repurchase agreements in the local market and advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh (FHLB) and correspondent banks for asset growth and liquidity needs.  Borrowings included $66,126,000 and $62,536,000 in long-term advances from the FHLB at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively.  To help reduce the Bank’s

22




reliance on overnight funding, during the quarter $16,000,000 of advances that had matured or converted, and carried a weighted-average interest rate of 4.78%, were replaced with fixed- and capped floating- rate advances amounting to an aggregate of  $20,000,000 that mature in 2009 and carry an initial weighted-average interest rate of 5.40%.  Also included in borrowings were short-term repurchase agreements of $21,476,000 and $22,224,000, as of the respective periods.  Repurchase agreements are non-insured interest-bearing liabilities that have a security interest in qualified investment securities of the Bank and are offered in both sweep and fixed-term products.  A sweep account is designed to ensure that, on a daily basis, an attached DDA is adequately funded and excess DDA funds are transferred, or swept into an overnight interest-bearing repurchase agreement account.  The balance in customer repurchase agreement accounts can fluctuate daily because the daily sweep product is dependent on the level of available funds in depositor accounts.  In addition, short-term borrowings may include overnight balances which the Bank may require from time-to-time to fund daily liquidity needs.  As of June 30, 2007, the Bank had $7,110,000 in overnight balances compared to $10,395,000 at December 31, 2006.

Item 3.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk

Management of interest rate risk and market risk analysis

The Company is subject to the interest rate risks inherent in our lending, investing and financing activities.  Fluctuations of interest rates will impact interest income and interest expense along with affecting market values of all interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, except for those assets or liabilities with a short term remaining to maturity.  Interest rate risk management is an integral part of the asset/liability management process.  The Company has instituted certain procedures and policy guidelines to manage the interest rate risk position.  Those internal policies enable the Company to react to changes in market rates to protect net interest income from significant fluctuations.  The primary objective in managing interest rate risk is to minimize the adverse impact of changes in interest rates on net interest income along with creating an asset/liability structure that maximizes earnings.

Asset/Liability Management.  One major objective of the Company when managing the rate sensitivity of its assets and liabilities is to stabilize net interest income.  The management of and authority to assume interest rate risk is the responsibility of the Company’s Asset/Liability Committee (ALCO), which is comprised of senior management and members of the Board of Directors.  ALCO meets quarterly to monitor the relationship of interest sensitive assets to interest sensitive liabilities.  The process to review interest rate risk is a regular part of managing the Company.  Consistent policies and practices of measuring and reporting interest rate risk exposure, particularly regarding the treatment of non-contractual assets and liabilities, are in effect.  In addition, there is an annual process to review the interest rate risk policy with the Board of Directors which includes limits on the impact to earnings from shifts in interest rates.

Interest Rate Risk Measurement.  Interest rate risk is monitored through the use of three complementary measures:  static gap analysis, earnings at risk simulation and economic value at risk simulation.  While each of the interest rate risk measurements has limitations, taken together they represent a reasonably comprehensive view of the magnitude of interest rate risk in the Company and the distribution of risk along the yield curve, the level of risk through time and the amount of exposure to changes in certain interest rate relationships.

Static Gap. The ratio between assets and liabilities re-pricing in specific time intervals is referred to as an interest rate sensitivity gap.  Interest rate sensitivity gaps can be managed to take advantage of the slope of the yield curve as well as forecasted changes in the level of interest rate changes.

To manage this interest rate sensitivity gap position, an asset/liability model commonly known as cumulative gap analysis is used to monitor the difference in the volume of the Company’s interest sensitive assets and liabilities that mature or re-price within given periods.  A positive gap (asset sensitive) indicates that more assets will re-price during a given period compared to liabilities, while a negative gap (liability sensitive) has the opposite effect.  The Company employs computerized net interest income simulation modeling to assist in quantifying interest rate risk exposure.  This process measures and quantifies the impact on net interest income through varying interest rate changes and balance sheet compositions.  The use of this model assists the ALCO to gauge the effects of the interest rate changes on interest sensitive assets and liabilities in order to determine what impact these rate changes will have upon the net interest spread.  At June 30, 2007, the Company maintained a negative one-year cumulative gap of $60,715,000 or -10.6% of total assets.  The effect of this negative gap position provided a mismatch of assets and liabilities which may expose the Bank to interest rate risk during periods of rising interest rates.  Conversely, in a declining interest rate environment, net interest income could be positively impacted because more liabilities than assets will re-price downward during a one-year period.

Certain shortcomings are inherent in the method of analysis discussed above and presented in the next table.  Although certain assets and liabilities may have similar maturities or periods of re-pricing, they may react in different degrees to changes in market interest rates.  The interest rates on certain types of assets and liabilities may fluctuate in advance of

23




changes in market interest rates, while interest rates on other types of assets and liabilities may lag behind changes in market interest rates.  Certain assets, such as adjustable-rate mortgages, have features which restrict changes in interest rates on a short-term basis and over the life of the asset.  In the event of a change in interest rates, prepayment and early withdrawal levels may deviate significantly from those assumed in calculating the table.  The ability of many borrowers to service their adjustable-rate debt may decrease in the event of an interest rate increase.

The following table illustrates the Company’s interest sensitivity gap position at June 30, 2007 (dollars in thousands):

 

 

Three months

 

Three to

 

One to

 

Over

 

 

 

 

 

or less

 

twelve months

 

three years

 

three years

 

Total

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

198

 

$

 

$

 

$

12,023

 

$

12,221

 

Investment securities (1)(2)

 

15,221

 

7,079

 

23,104

 

66,712

 

112,116

 

Loans (2)

 

108,848

 

65,034

 

102,852

 

143,624

 

420,358

 

Fixed and other assets

 

 

8,331

 

 

20,466

 

28,797

 

Total assets

 

$

124,267

 

$

80,444

 

$

125,956

 

$

242,825

 

$

573,492

 

Total cumulative assets

 

$

124,267

 

$

204,711

 

$

330,667

 

$

573,492

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-interest-bearing transaction deposits (3)

 

$

 

$

7,206

 

$

19,818

 

$

45,044

 

$

72,068

 

Interest-bearing transaction deposits (3)

 

96,229

 

 

35,968

 

54,010

 

186,207

 

Certificates of deposit

 

45,698

 

72,982

 

40,332

 

4,044

 

163,056

 

Repurchase agreements

 

21,294

 

181

 

 

 

21,475

 

Short-term borrowings

 

8,126

 

 

 

 

8,126

 

Long-term debt

 

13,177

 

533

 

10,415

 

42,000

 

66,125

 

Other liabilities

 

 

 

 

4,236

 

4,236

 

Total liabilities

 

$

184,524

 

$

80,902

 

$

106,533

 

$

149,334

 

$

521,293

 

Total cumulative liabilities

 

$

184,524

 

$

265,426

 

$

371,959

 

$

521,293

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest sensitivity gap

 

$

(60,257

)

$

(458

)

$

19,423

 

$

93,491

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cumulative gap

 

$

(60,257

)

$

(60,715

)

$

(41,292

)

$

52,199

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cumulative gap to total assets

 

(10.51

)%

(10.59

)%

(7.20

)%

9.10

%

 

 

 


(1)   Includes FHLB stock and the net unrealized gains/losses on securities AFS.

(2)   Investments and loans are included in the earlier of the period in which interest rates were next scheduled to adjust or the period in which they are due.  In addition, loans are included in the periods in which they are scheduled to be repaid based on scheduled amortization.  For amortizing loans and mortgage-backed securities, annual prepayment rates are assumed reflecting historical experience as well as management’s knowledge and experience of its loan products.

(3)   The Bank’s demand and savings accounts are generally subject to immediate withdrawal.  However, management considers a certain amount of such accounts to be core accounts having significantly longer effective maturities based on the retention experiences of such deposits in changing interest rate environments.  The effective maturities presented are the recommended maturity distribution limits for non-maturing deposits based on historical deposit studies.

Earnings at Risk and Economic Value at Risk Simulations. The Company recognizes that more sophisticated tools exist for measuring the interest rate risk in the balance sheet beyond static re-pricing gap analysis.  Although it will continue to measure its re-pricing gap position, the Company utilizes additional modeling for identifying and measuring the interest rate risk in the overall balance sheet.  The ALCO is responsible for focusing on “earnings at risk” and “economic value at risk,” and how both relate to the risk-based capital position when analyzing the interest rate risk.

Earnings at Risk.  Earnings at risk simulation measures the change in net interest income and net income should interest rates rise and fall.  The simulation recognizes that not all assets and liabilities re-price one-for-one with market rates (e.g., savings rate).  The ALCO looks at “earnings at risk” to determine income changes from a base case scenario under an increase and decrease of 200 basis points in interest rate simulation models.

Economic Value at Risk.  Earnings at risk simulation measures the short-term risk in the balance sheet.  Economic value (or portfolio equity) at risk measures the long-term risk by finding the net present value of the future cash flows from the

24




Company’s existing assets and liabilities.  The ALCO examines this ratio quarterly utilizing an increase and decrease of 200 basis points in interest rates simulation models.  The ALCO recognizes that, in some instances, this ratio may contradict the “earnings at risk” ratio.

The following table illustrates the simulated impact of 200 basis points upward or downward movement in interest rates on net interest income, net income and the change in the economic value (portfolio equity).  This analysis assumed that interest-earning asset and interest-bearing liability levels at June 30, 2007 remained constant.  The impact of the rate movements was developed by simulating the effect of rates changing over a twelve-month period from the June 30, 2007 levels:

 

Rates +200

 

Rates -200

 

Earnings at risk:

 

 

 

 

 

Percent change in:

 

 

 

 

 

Net interest income

 

(10.0

)%

5.0

%

Net income

 

(29.1

)

14.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Economic value at risk:

 

 

 

 

 

Percent change in:

 

 

 

 

 

Economic value of equity

 

(27.4

)

8.4

 

Economic value of equity as a percent of total assets

 

(3.1

)

0.9

 

 

Economic value has the most meaning when viewed within the context of risk-based capital.  Therefore, the economic value may normally change beyond the Company’s policy guideline for a short period of time as long as the risk-based capital ratio (after adjusting for the excess equity exposure) is greater than 10%.  At June 30, 2007, the Company’s risk-based capital ratio was 13.9%.

The table below summarizes estimated changes in net interest income over a twelve-month period beginning July 1, 2007 under alternate interest rate scenarios using the income simulation model described above (dollars in thousands):

 

Net interest

 

$

 

%

 

Change in interest rates

 

income

 

variance

 

variance

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

+200 basis points

 

$

16,599

 

$

(1,848

)

(10.0

)%

+100 basis points

 

17,839

 

(608

)

(3.3

)

Flat rate

 

18,447

 

 

 

-100 basis points

 

19,213

 

766

 

4.2

 

-200 basis points

 

19,371

 

924

 

5.0

 

 

Simulation models require assumptions about certain categories of assets and liabilities.  The models schedule existing assets and liabilities by their contractual maturity, estimated likely call date or earliest re-pricing opportunity.  Mortgage-backed securities and amortizing loans are scheduled based on their anticipated cash flow including estimated prepayments.  For investment securities, the Bank uses a third-party service to provide cash flow estimates in the various rate environments.  Savings accounts, including passbook, statement savings, money market and NOW accounts, do not have a stated maturity or re-pricing term and can be withdrawn or re-priced at any time.  This may impact the margin if more expensive alternative sources of deposits are required to fund loans or deposit runoff.  Management projects the re-pricing characteristics of these accounts based on historical performance and assumptions that it believes reflect their rate sensitivity.  The model reinvests all maturities, repayments and prepayments for each type of asset or liability into the same product for a new like term at current product interest rates provided by management.  As a result, the mix of interest-earning assets and interest bearing-liabilities is not held constant.

Derivative Financial Instruments.  As part of the Bank’s overall interest rate risk management strategy, the Company has adopted a policy whereby the Bank may periodically use derivative instruments to minimize significant fluctuations in earnings caused by interest rate volatility.  This interest rate risk management strategy entails the use of interest rate

25




floors, caps and swaps.  The Bank entered into an interest rate floor agreement in 2006 and is reflected in the scenarios for earnings and economic value at risk and the net interest income in the two immediately preceding tables.

Liquidity

Liquidity management ensures that adequate funds will be available to meet customers’ needs for borrowings, deposit withdrawals and maturities and normal operating expenses of the Bank.  Current sources of liquidity are cash and cash equivalents, asset maturities and pay-downs within one year, loans and investments AFS, growth of core deposits, growth of repurchase agreements, increases in other borrowed funds from correspondent banks and issuance of capital stock.  Although regularly scheduled investment and loan payments are dependable sources of daily funds, the sales of both loans and investments AFS, deposit activity, and investment and loan prepayments are significantly influenced by general economic conditions and the level of interest rates.

As of June 30, 2007, the Company maintained approximately $12,221,000 in cash and cash equivalents, $106,713,000 of investments AFS and $205,000 of loans AFS.  In addition, as of June 30, 2007, the Company had approximately $127,162,000 available to borrow from the FHLB and $30,000,000 available from other correspondent banks.  This combined total of $276,301,000 represented 48% of total assets at June 30, 2007.  Management believes this level of liquidity to be strong and adequate to support current operations.

Capital

During the first half of 2007, shareholders’ equity increased from net income, stock issuance from the Company’s various sponsored stock plans, partially offset by an increase in the unrealized loss on AFS securities, a decrease in the intrinsic value of the Bank’s cash flow hedge and the declaration of cash dividends.  The Company is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies.  Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possible additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Company’s financial statements.  Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Company must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the Company’s assets, liabilities and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices.  The Company’s capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk-weightings and other factors.

Under these guidelines, assets and certain off-balance sheet items are assigned to broad risk categories, each with appropriate weights.  The resulting capital ratios represent capital as a percentage of total risk-weighted assets and certain off-balance sheet items.  The guidelines require all banks and bank holding companies to maintain a minimum ratio of total risk-based capital to total risk-weighted assets (Total Risk Adjusted Capital) of 8%, including Tier I capital to total risk-weighted assets (Tier I Capital) of 4% and Tier I capital to average total assets (Leverage Ratio) of at least 4%.

As of June 30, 2007, the Company and the Bank met all capital adequacy requirements to which it was subject.  The following table depicts the capital amounts and ratios of the Company and the Bank as of June 30, 2007:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

To be well capitalized

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For capital

 

under prompt corrective

 

 

 

Actual

 

 

 

adequacy purposes

 

action provisions

 

 

 

Amount

 

Ratio

 

Amount

 

Ratio

 

Amount

 

Ratio

 

Total capital

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(to risk-weighted assets)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated

 

$

59,579,254

 

13.9

³

$

34,423,338

³

8.0

%

N/A

 

N/A

 

Bank

 

$

59,252,490

 

13.8

³

$

34,417,303

³

8.0

³

$

43,021,629

³

10.0

%

Tier I capital

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(to risk-weighted assets)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated

 

$

54,194,168

 

12.6

³

$

17,211,669

³

4.0

%

N/A

 

N/A

 

Bank

 

$

53,948,927

 

12.5

³

$

17,208,651

³

4.0

³

$

25,812,977

³

6.0

%

Tier I capital

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(to average assets)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated

 

$

54,194,168

 

9.6

³

$

22,690,263

³

4.0

%

N/A

 

N/A

 

Bank

 

$

53,948,927

 

9.5

³

$

22,675,370

³

4.0

³

$

28,344,213

³

5.0

%

 

26




Item 4.  Controls and Procedures

The Company maintains controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or furnishes under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Based upon their evaluation of those controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officers of the Company concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were adequate.

The Company assesses the adequacy of its internal control over financial reporting quarterly and enhances its controls in response to internal control assessments and internal and external audit and regulatory recommendations.  Based on this assessment, the Company’s management concluded that there have been no changes in the Company’s internal controls or in other factors that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II - Other Information

Item 1.  Legal Proceedings

The nature of the Company’s business generates some litigation involving matters arising in the ordinary course of business.  However, in the opinion of the Company, after consulting with legal counsel, no legal proceedings are pending, which, if determined adversely to the Company or the Bank, would have a material effect on the Company’s undivided profits or financial condition.  No legal proceedings are pending other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to the business of the Company and the Bank.  In addition, to management’s knowledge, no governmental authorities have initiated or contemplated any material legal actions against the Company or the Bank.

Item 1A.   Risk Factors

Management of the Company does not believe there have been any material changes in the risk factors that were disclosed in the Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 20, 2007.

Item 2.     Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

None

Item 3.     Default Upon Senior Securities

None

Item 4.     Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

At the annual meeting of shareholders held on May 1, 2007, the judges of election made the report concerning the results of balloting.  Holders of 1,628,253 shares of common stock, representing 79% of the total number of shares outstanding, were represented in person or by proxy at the 2007 annual meeting of shareholders.

The following votes were cast:

Election of Class C Directors to serve for a three-year term:

 

For

 

Withhold authority

 

Abstain

 

Brian J. Cali

 

1,612,938

 

15,315

 

 

Patrick J. Dempsey

 

1,613,916

 

14,336

 

 

 

In addition to the above elected Class C Directors, at the conclusion of its annual meeting, the Company’s Board of Directors consisted of: Samuel C. Cali, Mary E. McDonald and David L. Tressler, Sr. as Class B Directors whose term expires in 2008; and Paul A. Barrett, John T. Cognetti and Michael J. McDonald as Class A Directors whose term expires in 2009.  Mr. Barrett passed away on May 14, 2007.

Ratification of independent certified public accountants:

 

For

 

Against

 

Abstain

 

Parente Randolph, LLC

 

1,620,487

 

7,234

 

 

 

27




Item 5.     Other Information

                           None

Item 6.    Exhibits

The following exhibits are filed herewith or incorporated by reference as a part of this Form 10-Q:

*10.1

 

Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement between Fidelity D & D Bancorp, Inc., The Fidelity Deposit and Discount Bank and Steven C. Ackmann, dated July 11, 2007.  Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 13, 2007.

 

 

 

 

 

11

 

Statement regarding computation of earnings per share.  Included herein in Note 2, “Earnings per share,”contained within the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, and incorporated herein by reference.

 

 

 

 

 

31.1

 

Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Principal Executive Officer, filed herewith.

 

 

 

 

 

31.2

 

Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Principal Financial Officer, filed herewith.

 

 

 

 

 

32.1

 

Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith

 

 

 

 

 

32.2

 

Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith.

 


* Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

FIDELITY D & D BANCORP, INC.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

FIDELITY D & D BANCORP, INC.

 

 

 

 

Date: August 6, 2007

/s/ Steven C. Ackmann

 

 

 

Steven C. Ackmann,

 

 

President and Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

 

Date: August 6, 2007

/s/ Salvatore R. DeFrancesco, Jr.

 

 

 

Salvatore R. DeFrancesco, Jr.,

 

 

Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer

 

28




EXHIBIT INDEX

 

Page

 

 

 

10.1 Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement between Fidelity D & D Bancorp, Inc., The Fidelity Deposit and Discount Bank and Steven C. Ackmann, dated July 11, 2007.  Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 13, 2007.

 

*

 

 

 

11 Statement regarding computation of earnings per share.  Included herein.

 

  8

 

 

 

31.1 Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Principal Executive Officer.

 

30

 

 

 

31.2 Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Principal Financial Officer.

 

31

 

 

 

32.1 Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

32

 

 

 

32.2 Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

32

 


* Incorporated by Reference

29