UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
[ X ] | Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010. |
OR
[ ] | Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the transition period from _____________ to _____________. |
Commission File Number: 001-32007
NEWALLIANCE BANCSHARES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE | 52-2407114 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
195 Church Street, New Haven, Connecticut | 06510 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant
(1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject
to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant
has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every
Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer | X | Accelerated filer | |||||
Non-accelerated filer | Smaller reporting company | ||||||
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). | [ ] | Yes | [ X] | No |
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Common Stock (par value $.01) | 105,077,475 | ||
Class | Outstanding at November 5, 2010 |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Part I FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
2
New Alliance Bancshares, Inc.
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
(In thousands, except per share data) (Unaudited) | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||
Assets | ||||||||
Cash and due from banks |
$ | 122,334 | $ | 96,927 | ||||
Short term investments |
50,000 | 50,000 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
172,334 | 146,927 | ||||||
Investment securities available for sale, at fair value (note 4) |
2,335,362 | 2,327,855 | ||||||
Investment securities held to maturity (note 4) |
298,495 | 240,766 | ||||||
Loans held for sale (includes $25,647 at September 30, 2010 and |
||||||||
$12,908 at December 31, 2009 measured at fair value) |
27,229 | 14,659 | ||||||
Loans, net (note 5) |
5,014,100 | 4,709,582 | ||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston stock |
120,821 | 120,821 | ||||||
Premises and equipment, net |
58,395 | 57,083 | ||||||
Cash surrender value of bank owned life insurance |
135,877 | 140,153 | ||||||
Goodwill (note 6) |
527,167 | 527,167 | ||||||
Identifiable intangible assets (note 6) |
29,501 | 35,359 | ||||||
Other assets (note 7) |
106,994 | 113,941 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 8,826,275 | $ | 8,434,313 | ||||
Liabilities | ||||||||
Deposits (note 8) |
||||||||
Non-interest bearing |
$ | 581,293 | $ | 534,180 | ||||
Savings, interest-bearing checking and money market |
3,097,792 | 3,008,416 | ||||||
Time |
1,459,775 | 1,481,446 | ||||||
Total deposits |
5,138,860 | 5,024,042 | ||||||
Borrowings (note 9) |
2,122,596 | 1,889,928 | ||||||
Other liabilities |
91,451 | 85,390 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
7,352,907 | 6,999,360 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies (note 13) |
||||||||
Stockholders Equity | ||||||||
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; authorized 38,000 shares; |
- | - | ||||||
none issued |
||||||||
Common stock, $0.01 par value; authorized 190,000 shares; |
||||||||
issued 121,486 shares at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 |
1,215 | 1,215 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
1,245,592 | 1,245,489 | ||||||
Unallocated common stock held by ESOP |
(85,977 | ) | (88,721 | ) | ||||
Unearned restricted stock compensation |
(7,326 | ) | (12,389 | ) | ||||
Treasury stock, at cost (16,409 shares at September 30, 2010 and |
||||||||
15,435 shares at December 31, 2009) |
(222,860 | ) | (211,582 | ) | ||||
Retained earnings |
512,678 | 486,974 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (note 17) |
30,046 | 13,967 | ||||||
Total stockholders equity |
1,473,368 | 1,434,953 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 8,826,275 | $ | 8,434,313 | ||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
NewAlliance
Bancshares, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Income
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||||
(In thousands, except per share data) (Unaudited) | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||||
Interest and dividend income | ||||||||||||||||||
Residential real estate loans |
$ | 30,288 | $ | 31,983 | $ | 89,561 | $ | 100,358 | ||||||||||
Commercial real estate loans |
18,994 | 17,791 | 55,909 | 52,855 | ||||||||||||||
Commercial business loans |
6,846 | 5,419 | 17,631 | 16,658 | ||||||||||||||
Consumer loans |
7,826 | 8,517 | 23,908 | 25,821 | ||||||||||||||
Investment securities |
24,420 | 28,495 | 75,759 | 85,070 | ||||||||||||||
Federal funds sold and other short-term investments |
46 | 63 | 112 | 342 | ||||||||||||||
Total interest and dividend income |
88,420 | 92,268 | 262,880 | 281,104 | ||||||||||||||
Interest expense | ||||||||||||||||||
Deposits |
12,007 | 18,930 | 38,353 | 63,048 | ||||||||||||||
Borrowings |
16,067 | 21,576 | 50,799 | 68,374 | ||||||||||||||
Total interest expense |
28,074 | 40,506 | 89,152 | 131,422 | ||||||||||||||
Net interest income before provision for loan losses |
60,346 | 51,762 | 173,728 | 149,682 | ||||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses | 4,000 | 5,433 | 14,300 | 14,533 | ||||||||||||||
Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
56,346 | 46,329 | 159,428 | 135,149 | ||||||||||||||
Non-interest income | ||||||||||||||||||
Depositor service charges |
7,210 | 7,270 | 21,375 | 20,175 | ||||||||||||||
Loan and servicing income, net |
689 | 322 | 1,357 | 498 | ||||||||||||||
Trust fees |
1,590 | 1,569 | 4,764 | 4,219 | ||||||||||||||
Investment management, brokerage and insurance fees |
1,319 | 1,700 | 4,135 | 5,514 | ||||||||||||||
Bank owned life insurance |
822 | 882 | 5,131 | 2,652 | ||||||||||||||
Other-than-temporary impairment losses on securities |
- | - | (30 | ) | (2,522 | ) | ||||||||||||
Less: Portion of loss recognized in other comprehensive income (before taxes) |
(378 | ) | - | (900 | ) | 1,896 | ||||||||||||
Net impairment losses on securities recognized in earnings |
(378 | ) | - | (930 | ) | (626 | ) | |||||||||||
Net gain on sale of securities |
799 | 2,029 | 1,549 | 6,139 | ||||||||||||||
Net securities gain |
421 | 2,029 | 619 | 5,513 | ||||||||||||||
Mortgage origination activity and loan sale income |
1,150 | 1,268 | 2,449 | 4,768 | ||||||||||||||
Net gain (loss) on limited partnerships |
399 | 284 | 3,103 | (375 | ) | |||||||||||||
Other |
1,018 | 1,125 | 2,971 | 3,039 | ||||||||||||||
Total non-interest income |
14,618 | 16,449 | 45,904 | 46,003 | ||||||||||||||
Non-interest expense | ||||||||||||||||||
Salaries and employee benefits (notes 10 & 11) |
25,606 | 22,443 | 71,809 | 65,281 | ||||||||||||||
Occupancy |
4,480 | 4,287 | 13,195 | 13,686 | ||||||||||||||
Furniture and fixtures |
1,487 | 1,419 | 4,258 | 4,348 | ||||||||||||||
Outside services |
4,279 | 4,779 | 14,146 | 14,584 | ||||||||||||||
Advertising, public relations, and sponsorships |
1,779 | 1,869 | 4,796 | 3,984 | ||||||||||||||
Amortization of identifiable intangible assets |
1,953 | 2,122 | 5,858 | 6,379 | ||||||||||||||
FDIC insurance premiums |
1,891 | 1,880 | 5,646 | 8,717 | ||||||||||||||
Merger related charges |
4,585 | 4 | 5,089 | 27 | ||||||||||||||
Other |
4,186 | 3,439 | 11,277 | 10,023 | ||||||||||||||
Total non-interest expense |
50,246 | 42,242 | 136,074 | 127,029 | ||||||||||||||
Income before income taxes |
20,718 | 20,536 | 69,258 | 54,123 | ||||||||||||||
Income tax provision (note 12) |
6,802 | 7,916 | 22,636 | 19,805 | ||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 13,916 | $ | 12,620 | $ | 46,622 | $ | 34,318 | ||||||||||
Basic earnings per share (note 18) |
$ | 0.14 | $ | 0.13 | $ | 0.47 | $ | 0.35 | ||||||||||
Diluted earnings per share (note 18) |
0.14 | 0.13 | 0.47 | 0.35 | ||||||||||||||
Weighted-average shares outstanding (note 18) |
||||||||||||||||||
Basic |
98,285 | 99,507 | 98,693 | 99,292 | ||||||||||||||
Diluted |
98,487 | 99,570 | 98,772 | 99,298 | ||||||||||||||
Dividends per share |
$ | 0.07 | $ | 0.07 | $ | 0.21 | $ | 0.21 |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
NewAlliance Bancshares, Inc.
Consolidated
Statement of Changes in Stockholders Equity
Unallocated | Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common | Par Value | Additional | Common | Other | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 | Shares | Common | Paid-in | Stock Held | Unearned | Treasury | Retained | Comprehensive | Stockholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands, except per share data) (Unaudited) | Outstanding | Stock | Capital | by ESOP | Compensation | Stock | Earnings | Income | Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance December 31, 2009 | 106,051 | $ | 1,215 | $ | 1,245,489 | $ | (88,721 | ) | $ | (12,389 | ) | $ | (211,582 | ) | $ | 486,974 | $ | 13,967 | $ | 1,434,953 | |||||||||||||||
Dividends declared ($0.21 per share) | (20,918 | ) | (20,918 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allocation of ESOP shares, net of tax | (313 | ) | 2,744 | 2,431 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Treasury shares acquired (note 16) | (974 | ) | (11,278 | ) | (11,278 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted stock expense | 5,063 | 5,063 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock option expense | 416 | 416 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
46,622 | 46,622 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income, net of tax (note 17) |
16,079 | 16,079 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
62,701 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance September 30, 2010 | 105,077 | $ | 1,215 | $ | 1,245,592 | $ | (85,977 | ) | $ | (7,326 | ) | $ | (222,860 | ) | $ | 512,678 | $ | 30,046 | $ | 1,473,368 | |||||||||||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
NewAlliance
Bancshares, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Nine Months Ended | ||||||||
September 30, | ||||||||
(In thousands) (Unaudited) | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||
Cash flows from operating activities | ||||||||
Net income | $ | 46,622 | $ | 34,318 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities | ||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
14,300 | 14,533 | ||||||
Net loss on OREO |
101 | 160 | ||||||
Restricted stock compensation expense |
5,063 | 4,482 | ||||||
Stock option compensation expense |
416 | 243 | ||||||
ESOP expense |
2,431 | 2,410 | ||||||
Amortization of identifiable intangible assets |
5,858 | 6,379 | ||||||
Net amortization/accretion of fair market adjustments from net assets acquired |
(1,220 | ) | (2,294 | ) | ||||
Net amortization/accretion of investment securities |
7,789 | 4,089 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
(2,894 | ) | (1,912 | ) | ||||
Depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment |
4,752 | 4,860 | ||||||
Net gain on securities |
(1,549 | ) | (6,139 | ) | ||||
Impairment losses on securities |
930 | 626 | ||||||
Mortgage origination activity and loan sale income |
(2,449 | ) | (4,768 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sales of loans held for sale |
211,202 | 408,122 | ||||||
Loans originated for sale |
(221,323 | ) | (412,742 | ) | ||||
(Gain) loss on sale of fixed assets |
(5 | ) | 20 | |||||
Net (gain) loss on limited partnerships |
(3,103 | ) | 375 | |||||
Increase in cash surrender value of bank owned life insurance |
(2,500 | ) | (2,652 | ) | ||||
Decrease in other assets |
4,475 | 2,545 | ||||||
Increase in other liabilities |
6,061 | 3,425 | ||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
74,957 | 56,080 | ||||||
Cash flows from investing activities | ||||||||
Purchase of securities available for sale |
(731,976 | ) | (1,041,439 | ) | ||||
Purchase of securities held to maturity |
(140,637 | ) | (22,431 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from maturity, sales, calls and principal reductions of |
||||||||
securities available for sale |
742,075 | 623,269 | ||||||
Proceeds from maturity, calls and principal reductions of |
||||||||
securities held to maturity |
82,535 | 69,657 | ||||||
Proceeds from sales of fixed assets |
6 | 32 | ||||||
Net (increase) decrease in loans held for investment |
(321,962 | ) | 140,458 | |||||
Proceeds from sales of other real estate owned |
3,393 | 2,468 | ||||||
Proceeds from bank owned life insurance |
6,776 | 263 | ||||||
Purchase of premises and equipment |
(6,004 | ) | (2,827 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(365,794 | ) | (230,550 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from financing activities | ||||||||
Net increase in customer deposit balances |
114,782 | 526,606 | ||||||
Net increase (decrease) in short-term borrowings |
128,510 | (50,727 | ) | |||||
Proceeds from long-term borrowings |
675,100 | 142,000 | ||||||
Repayments of long-term borrowings |
(569,952 | ) | (424,072 | ) | ||||
Book under/(over) tax benefit of stock-based compensation |
- | (84 | ) | |||||
Acquisition of treasury shares |
(11,278 | ) | (4,736 | ) | ||||
Dividends paid |
(20,918 | ) | (21,109 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
316,244 | 167,878 | ||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
25,407 | (6,592 | ) | |||||
Cash and equivalents, beginning of period |
146,927 | 153,131 | ||||||
Cash and equivalents, end of period |
$ | 172,334 | $ | 146,539 | ||||
Supplemental information | ||||||||
Cash paid for |
||||||||
Interest on deposits and borrowings |
$ | 90,418 | $ | 133,458 | ||||
Income taxes paid, net |
24,112 | 18,592 | ||||||
Noncash transactions |
||||||||
Loans transferred to other real estate owned |
3,349 | 3,860 |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
6
NewAlliance
Bancshares, Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
1. |
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies |
|
Financial
Statement Presentation |
||
The consolidated
financial statements of NewAlliance Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) have
been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting
of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have
been included. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been
eliminated in consolidation. Amounts in prior period financial statements are reclassified
whenever necessary to conform to the current year presentation. These consolidated
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated
financial statements and notes thereto included in the Companys Annual Report
on Form 10-K as of and for the year ended December 31, 2009. |
||
The preparation
of the consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and
expenses and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Actual results
could differ from those estimates. |
||
Material estimates
that are particularly susceptible to significant near-term change relate to the
determination of the allowance for loan losses, the obligation and expense for pension
and other postretirement benefits, and estimates used to evaluate asset impairment
including investment securities, income tax contingencies and deferred tax assets
and liabilities and the recoverability of goodwill and other intangible assets. |
||
Management
has determined that no subsequent events have occurred following the balance sheet
date of September 30, 2010 which requires recognition or disclosure in the financial
statements. |
||
Cash and
Cash Equivalents |
||
For purposes
of reporting cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand and due
from banks and short-term investments with original maturities of three months or
less. At September 30, 2010, included in the balance of cash and due from banks
were cash on hand of $122.3 million, which includes required reserves in the form
of deposits with the Federal Reserve Bank (FRB) of approximately $34.1
million. Short-term investments included money market funds of $50.0 million at September
30, 2010. |
||
Investment
Securities |
||
Marketable
equity and debt securities are classified as either trading, available for sale,
or held to maturity (applies only to debt securities). Management determines the
appropriate classifications of securities at the time of purchase. At September
30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Company had no debt or equity securities classified
as trading. Held to maturity securities are debt securities for which the Company
has the ability and intent to hold until maturity. All other securities not included
in held to maturity are classified as available for sale. Held to maturity securities
are recorded at amortized cost, adjusted for the amortization or accretion of premiums
or discounts. Available for sale securities are recorded at fair value. Unrealized
gains and losses, net of the related tax effect, on available for sale securities
are excluded from earnings and are reported in accumulated other comprehensive income,
a separate component of equity, until realized. Further information relating to
the fair value of securities can be found within Note 14 of the Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements. |
||
Premiums and
discounts on debt securities are amortized or accreted into interest income over
the term of the securities using the level yield method. In accordance with Financial
Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification
(FASB ASC) 320 Debt and Equity Securities, a decline in
market value of a debt security below amortized cost that is deemed other than temporary
is charged to earnings for the credit related other than temporary impairment (OTTI) resulting in the establishment of a new cost basis for the security,
while the non-credit related OTTI is recognized in other comprehensive income (OCI) if there is no intent to sell or will not be required to sell the
security. If an equity security is deemed other-than-temporarily impaired, the
full impairment is recorded as a charge to earnings. Gains and losses on sales of
securities are recognized at the time of sale on a specific identification basis. |
||
Federal
Home Loan Bank of Boston stock |
||
As a member
of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston, (FHLB Boston), the Bank is
required to hold a certain amount of FHLB Boston stock. This stock is considered
to be a non-marketable equity security reported at cost. The level of stock purchases
is determined by the Banks advances outstanding and the amount of residential
mortgage assets on the Banks balance sheet. The shares can only be purchased
and sold between the FHLB Boston and the Company at a par value of $100 per share. |
7
NewAlliance
Bancshares, Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Loans Held
for Sale |
||
The Company
currently sells the majority of originated fixed rate residential real estate loans
with terms of 15 years and over. Mortgage loans held for sale are carried at fair
value. Fair value is estimated using quoted loan market prices provided by government-sponsored
entities of Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA) and Federal
Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC). Further information regarding
the fair value measurement of mortgage loans held for sale can be found in Note
14 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Residential loans are sold
by the Company without recourse. The Company currently sells these loans servicing
released. |
||
The Company
is also involved in the Small Business Administration (SBA) loan secondary
market. The Company currently sells the guaranteed portion of SBA loans that meet
certain criteria and retains the unguaranteed portion and the right to service the
sold portion of the loan in its portfolio. Such loans are included in loans held
for sale on the balance sheet upon origination. SBA loans held for sale are valued
at the lower of cost (less principal payments received and net of deferred fees
and costs) or estimated fair value. Fair value is estimated using quoted market
prices from a secondary market broker. All other loan originations are classified
as loans held for investment. |
||
Loans Receivable
|
||
Loans are
stated at their principal amounts outstanding, net of deferred loan fees and costs
and fair value adjustments for loans acquired. |
||
Interest on
loans is credited to income as earned based on the rate applied to principal amounts
outstanding. Loans are placed on nonaccrual status when timely collection of principal
or interest in accordance with contractual terms is in question. The Companys
policy is to discontinue the accrual of interest when principal or interest payments
become 90 days delinquent or sooner if management concludes that circumstances indicate
borrowers may be unable to meet contractual principal or interest payments. If ultimately
collected, such interest is credited to income when received. Loans are removed
from nonaccrual status when they become current as to principal and interest and
when, in the opinion of management concern no longer exists as to the collectability
of principal and interest. |
||
Certain direct
loan origination fees and costs and fair value adjustments to acquired loans are
recognized over the lives of the related loans as an adjustment of interest using
the level yield method. When loans are prepaid, sold or participated out, the unamortized
portion is recognized as income or expense at that time. |
||
Allowance
for Loan Losses |
||
The adequacy
of the allowance for loan losses is regularly evaluated by management. Factors considered
in evaluating the adequacy of the allowance include previous loss experience, current
economic conditions and their effect on borrowers, the performance of individual
loans in relation to contract terms, and other pertinent factors. The provision
for loan losses charged to expense is based upon managements judgment of the
amount necessary to maintain the allowance at a level adequate to absorb probable
losses inherent in the loan portfolio. Loan losses are charged against the allowance
when management believes the collectability of the principal balance outstanding
is unlikely. |
||
In determining
the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, management reviews overall portfolio
quality through an evaluation of individual performing and impaired loans, the risk
characteristics of the loan portfolios, an analysis of current levels and trends
in charge offs, delinquency and nonperforming loan data, and the credit risk profile
of each component of the portfolio, among other factors. While management uses the
best available information to recognize losses on loans, future additions to the
allowance for loan losses may be necessary based on changes in economic conditions.
In addition, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination
process, periodically review the Banks allowance for loan losses. Such agencies
may require the Bank to recognize additions to the allowance based on their judgments
about information available to them at the time of their examinations. |
||
The allowance
for loan losses consists of a formula allowance following FASB ASC 450
Contingencies and FASB ASC 310 - Receivables, based on a variety of factors
including historical loss experience for various loan portfolio classifications,
and a specific valuation allowance for loans identified as impaired. The allowance
is an estimate, and ultimate losses may vary from managements estimate. Changes
in the estimate are recorded in the results of operations in the period in which
they become known, along with provisions for estimated losses incurred during that
period. |
||
A loan is
considered to be impaired when it is probable that the Company will be unable to
collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement.
Impaired loans, as defined, may be measured based on the present value of expected
future cash flows discounted at the loans original effective interest rate,
at the loans observable market price or the fair value of the collateral if
the loan is collateral dependent. When the measurement of the impaired loan is less
than the recorded investment in the loan, the impairment is recorded through a valuation
allowance. |
8
NewAlliance
Bancshares, Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements
Loan Servicing
Rights |
||
The Company
capitalizes servicing rights for loans sold based on the relative fair value which
is allocated between the servicing rights and the loans (without servicing rights). |
||
The cost basis
of loan servicing rights is amortized on a level yield basis over the period of
estimated net servicing revenue and such amortization is included in the consolidated
statement of income as a reduction of loan servicing fee income. Servicing rights
are evaluated for impairment by comparing their aggregate carrying amount to their
fair value. The fair value of loan servicing rights is estimated using a present
value cash flow model. The most important assumptions used in the valuation model
are the anticipated rate of loan prepayments and discount rates. All assumptions
are based on standards used by market participants. An independent appraisal of
the fair value of the Companys loan servicing rights is obtained as necessary,
but at least annually and is used by management to evaluate the reasonableness of
the fair value estimates. For interim quarters, management analyzes the current
variables and assesses the need for an independent appraisal. Impairment is recognized
as an adjustment to loan and servicing income. |
||
Premises
and Equipment |
||
Premises and
equipment are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation
and amortization are computed on the straight-line method using the estimated lives
of the assets. Estimated lives are 5 to 40 years for building and improvements and
3 to 10 years for furniture, fixtures and equipment. Amortization of leasehold improvements
is calculated on a straight-line basis over the terms of the related leases or the
life of the asset, whichever is shorter. The cost of maintenance and repairs is
charged to expense as incurred, whereas significant renovations are capitalized. |
||
Bank Owned
Life Insurance |
||
Bank owned
life insurance (BOLI) represents life insurance on certain employees
who have consented to allow the Bank to be the beneficiary of those policies. BOLI
is recorded as an asset at cash surrender value. Increases in the cash value of
the policies, as well as insurance proceeds received in excess of cash values, are
recorded in other non-interest income and are not subject to income tax. Management
reviews the financial strength of the insurance carriers on a quarterly basis and
BOLI with any individual carrier is limited to 15% of capital plus reserves. |
||
Goodwill
and Identifiable Intangible Assets |
||
The assets
(including identifiable intangible assets) and liabilities acquired in a business
combination are recorded at fair value at the date of acquisition. Goodwill is recognized
for the excess of the acquisition cost over the fair values of the net assets acquired
and is not subsequently amortized. Identifiable intangible assets are subsequently
amortized on a straight-line or accelerated basis, over their estimated lives. Management
assesses the recoverability of goodwill at least on an annual basis and all intangible
assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying
value may not be recoverable. If carrying amount exceeds fair value an impairment
charge is recorded to income. |
||
Income
Taxes |
||
The Company
files a consolidated federal tax return and various combined and separate Company
state tax returns. The Company uses the asset and liability method of accounting
for income taxes. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are established
for the temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and the tax
basis of the Companys assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets are also
recognized for available tax carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities
are measured using enacted tax rates expected to be in effect when temporary differences
and carryforwards are realized or settled. |
||
The deferred
tax asset is subject to reduction by a valuation allowance in certain circumstances.
This valuation allowance is recognized if, based on an analysis of available evidence,
management determines that it is more likely than not that some portion or all of
the deferred tax asset will not be realized. The valuation allowance is subject
to ongoing adjustment based on changes in circumstances that affect managements
judgment about the realization of the deferred tax asset. Adjustments to increase
or decrease the valuation allowance are charged or credited, respectively, to income
tax expense or in certain limited circumstances to equity. |
||
Income tax
expense includes the amount of taxes payable for the current year, and the deferred
tax benefit or expense for the period. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities
of a change in tax rates is recognized in income tax expense in the period that
includes the enactment date. |
||
The Company
is required to make a determination of an inventory of tax positions (federal and
state) for which the sustainability of the position, based upon the technical merits,
is uncertain. The Company regularly evaluates all tax positions taken and the likelihood
of those positions being sustained. If management is highly confident that the position
will be allowed and there is a |
9
NewAlliance
Bancshares, Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements
greater than
50% likelihood that the full amount of the tax position will be ultimately realized,
the company recognizes the full benefit associated with the tax position. Additionally,
interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions are included as a component
of income tax expense. |
||
Trust Assets
|
||
The Bank had
approximately $1.06 billion and $1.03 billion of assets under management at September
30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, in a fiduciary or agency capacity
for customers. These assets are not included in the accompanying consolidated financial
statements since they are not owned by the Bank. Trust income primarily consists
of management fees based on the assets under management. |
||
Pension
and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans |
||
The Company
has a noncontributory pension plan covering substantially all employees who meet
certain age and length of service requirements and who were employed by the Company
prior to January 1, 2008. Pension costs related to this plan are based upon actuarial
computations of current and future benefits for employees based on years of service
and the employees highest career earnings over a five-year consecutive period.
Costs are charged to non-interest expense and are funded in accordance with requirements
of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act and the Pension Protection Act of
2006. Contributions are intended to provide not only for benefits attributed to
service to date, but also for those expected to be earned in the future. |
||
In addition
to the qualified plan, the Company has supplemental retirement plans for certain
key officers. These plans, which are nonqualified, were designed to offset the impact
of changes in the pension plan that limit benefits for highly compensated employees
under qualified pension plans. |
||
The Company
also accrues costs related to postretirement healthcare and life insurance benefits,
which recognizes costs over the employees period of active employment. |
||
The discount
rate is set for the retirement plans by reference to high quality long-term fixed
income instrument yields. The discount rates were determined by applying the estimated
cash flows of the Companys retirement plans to the Citigroup Pension Liability
Yield Curve. The Moodys Aa long-term corporate bond index was also reviewed
as a benchmark. The expected long-term rate of return on the assets held in our
defined pension plan is based on market and economic conditions, the Plans
asset allocation and other factors. |
||
Based on our
review of rates at December 31, 2009, separate discount rates were chosen for each
type of benefit plan for the measurement of benefit obligations to better represent
the actual plans. Discount rates as of December 31, 2009 were 5.85% for the defined
benefit plan, 5.50% for the postretirement plan and 5.75% for the supplemental executive
retirement benefit plan. The expected long-term rate of return on the pension plan
assets was 7.75% for December 31, 2009. |
||
Stock-Based
Compensation |
||
The Company
accounts for stock option and restricted stock awards in accordance with FASB ASC
718 Compensation Stock Compensation. Pursuant to this
guidance, the fair value of stock option and restricted stock awards, measured at
grant date, is amortized to compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the
vesting period. |
||
Repurchase
Agreements |
||
Repurchase
agreements are accounted for as secured borrowings since the Company maintains effective
control over the transferred securities and the transfer meets the other criteria
for such accounting. Securities are sold to a counterparty with an agreement to
repurchase the same or substantially the same security at a specified price and
date. The Company has repurchase agreements with commercial or municipal customers
that are offered as a business banking service. Customer repurchase agreements are
for a term of one day and are backed by the purchasers interest in certain
U.S. Treasury Notes or other U.S. Government securities. The Company also has a
single dealer repurchase agreement that was initiated as a means to manage the Companys interest rate risk. The dealer repurchase agreement was issued for a term
of five years and matures in 2012. The dealer repurchase agreement is collateralized
by U.S. Government mortgage-backed securities. Obligations to repurchase securities
sold are reflected as a liability in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company
does not record transactions of repurchase agreements as sales. The securities underlying
the repurchase agreements remain in the available-for-sale investment securities
portfolio. |
||
Merger
Related Charges |
||
The Company
accounts for acquisitions in accordance with FASB ASC 805, Business Combinations.
Costs that do not meet the conditions for inclusion in the allocation of acquisition
cost, costs for contemplated acquisitions and recurring costs related to prior acquisitions
are expensed as incurred and are reported in other non-interest expense. These charges
consist primarily of |
10
NewAlliance
Bancshares, Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
consulting, legal, system conversion, printing and advertising costs associated with
acquired companies, acquisition targets and potential acquisition targets. Additionally,
merger related charges include costs associated with the impending acquisition of
the Company by First Niagara Financial Group, Inc. (First Niagara).
For acquisitions completed after January 1, 2009, pursuant to new business combination
accounting guidance, merger-related charges will also include acquisition related
transaction and restructuring costs which were previously capitalized as part of
the cost of the acquisition. |
||||
Related Party Transactions |
||||
Directors and executive officers of the Company and its subsidiaries and their associates
have been customers of and have had transactions with the Company, and management
expects that such persons will continue to have such transactions in the future. |
||||
Comprehensive Income |
||||
The purpose of reporting comprehensive income is to report a measure of all changes
in an entity that result from recognized transactions and other economic events
of the period other than transactions with owners in their capacity as owners. Comprehensive
income includes net income and certain changes in capital that are not recognized
in the statement of income (such as changes in net unrealized gains and losses on
securities available for sale). The Company has reported comprehensive income for
the nine months ended September 30, 2010 in the Consolidated Statement of Changes
in Stockholders Equity. The components of comprehensive income are presented
in Note 17 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. |
||||
Segment Reporting |
||||
The Companys only business segment is Community Banking. During the nine months
ended September 30, 2010 and the years ended 2009 and 2008, this segment represented
all the revenues and income of the consolidated group and therefore, is the only
reported segment as defined by FASB ASC 820, Segment Reporting. |
||||
Earnings
Per Share |
||||
Basic earnings per share (EPS) excludes dilution and is calculated by
dividing net income available to common stockholders by the weighted-average number
of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS is computed
in a manner similar to that of basic EPS except that the weighted-average number
of common shares outstanding is increased to include the number of incremental common
shares (computed using the treasury stock method) that would have been outstanding
if all potentially dilutive common shares (such as stock options and unvested restricted
stock) were issued during the period. Unallocated common shares held by the Employee
Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) are not included in the weighted-average
number of common shares outstanding for either basic or diluted earnings per share
calculations. |
||||
Earnings per share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009
can be found in Note 18 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. |
||||
2. |
Agreement and Plan of Merger |
|||
On August 18, 2010, the Company entered into a merger agreement whereby First Niagara
will acquire the Company in a stock and cash transaction valued at $1.5 billion.
If the merger agreement is approved and the merger is subsequently completed, NewAlliance
will become a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of First Niagara. The shares of NewAlliance
common stock owned by each NewAlliance stockholder will be converted, at the election
of such stockholder, but subject to certain agreed adjustment, election and allocations
procedures, into the right to receive one of the following: |
||||
|
for each NewAlliance
share owned by such stockholder, $14.28 in cash, without interest (the Cash
Consideration); |
|||
|
for each NewAlliance
share owned by such stockholder, 1.10 shares of First Niagara common stock (the
Stock Consideration); or |
|||
|
a combination
of the Cash Consideration and the Stock Consideration. |
|||
As a result of the elective option, the acquisition consideration each Company shareholder
elects to receive may be adjusted as necessary so that 86% of NewAlliance common stock will be converted to First Niagara common stock. |
||||
As a result of the merger, NewAlliance stockholders who receive Stock Consideration
will become stockholders of First Niagara. |
||||
The Merger Agreement has been unanimously approved by the board of directors of each
of the Company and First Niagara. Subject to the approval of the Companys
common stockholders of the Merger, the approval of First Niagaras common stockholders
of a stock issuance in connection with the Merger, regulatory approvals and other
customary closing conditions, the parties anticipate completing the merger early
in the second quarter of 2011. |
11
NewAlliance Bancshares, Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements
First Niagara
is a Delaware corporation that provides a wide range of retail and commercial banking
as well as other financial services. As of September 30, 2010, First Niagara had
approximately $21.0 billion of assets, $13.0 billion in deposits and 255 full service
branch locations across Upstate New York and Pennsylvania. |
||
3. |
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements |
|
Receivables
(Topic 310) |
||
In July 2010,
the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2010-20, Disclosures
about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses.
The statement is intended to improve the transparency of financial reporting by requiring
enhanced disclosures about a banks allowance for loan losses
and the credit quality of its financing receivables (generally defined as loans
and leases). The primary goal of the disclosure requirements is to provide more
information about the credit risk in a banks portfolio of loans and how that
risk is analyzed and assessed in arriving at the allowance for loan loss. The guidance
is effective for public entities for annual and interim reporting periods ending
on or after December 15, 2010. The adoption of ASU No. 2010-06 on December 31, 2010
will not have a material impact on the financial statements as it impacts disclosures
only. |
||
Fair Value
Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820) |
||
In February
2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-06, Improving Disclosures about Fair Value
Measurements. The amendment to Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,
requires additional disclosures about fair value measurements including transfer
in and out of Levels 1 and 2 and higher levels of disaggregation for the different
types of financial instruments. For the reconciliation of Level 3 fair values measurements,
information about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements should be presented
separately. The guidance was effective for annual and interim reporting periods
beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosure of information about
sales, issuances and settlements on a gross basis for assets and liabilities classified
as level 3, which is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15,
2010. The adoption of ASU No. 2010-06 on January 1, 2010 did not have a material
impact on the financial statements as it impacts disclosures only. |
||
Investments
Debt and Equity Securities (Topic 320) |
||
In April 2009,
the FASB issued new guidance on the Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary
Impairments (FASB ASC 320-10), which amends FASB ASC 320, Investments
Debt and Equity Securities, to make the other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI)
guidance more operational and to improve the presentation of other-than-temporary
impairments in the financial statements. This guidance replaced the existing requirement
that the entitys management assert it has both the intent and ability to hold
an impaired debt security until recovery with a requirement that management assert
it does not have the intent to sell the security, and it is more likely than not
it will not have to sell the security before recovery of its cost basis. When an
other-than-temporary impairment exists under this stated assertion, the amount of
impairment related to the credit loss component would be recognized in earnings
while the remaining amount would be recognized in other comprehensive income. This
guidance provides increased disclosure about the credit and noncredit components
of impaired debt securities that are not expected to be sold and also requires increased
and more frequent disclosures regarding expected cash flows, credit losses, and
an aging of securities with unrealized losses. Although this amendment does not
result in a change in the carrying amount of debt securities, it does require that
the portion of an other-than-temporary impairment not related to a credit loss for
a held-to-maturity security be recognized in a new category of other comprehensive
income and be amortized over the remaining life of the debt security as an increase
in the carrying value of the security. This new guidance does not amend existing
recognition and measurement guidance for other-than-temporary impairments of equity
securities. This guidance was effective for interim and annual periods ending after
June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15,
2009. The Company did not elect early application and the adoption resulted in a $1.0
million cumulative effect adjustment, net of taxes, to increase retained earnings
and decrease accumulated other comprehensive income as of April 1, 2009 for the
non-credit component of debt securities for which an other-than-temporary impairment
was previously recognized. Refer to Note 4 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements for further information on the Companys adoption of this guidance. |
12
NewAlliance
Bancshares, Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Transfers
of Financial Assets (Topic 860) |
||
In December
2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-16 codifying the new guidance issued in June
2009 regarding the Transfer of Financial Assets. This guidance requires entities
to provide more information about sales of securitized financial assets and similar
transactions, particularly if the seller retains some risk in the assets. The guidance
eliminates the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity, changes the requirements
for the derecognition of financial assets, and enhances the disclosure requirements
for sellers of the assets. This guidance was effective for the fiscal year beginning
after November 15, 2009. The adoption of ASU No. 2009-16 on January 1, 2010 did
not have a material impact on the financial statements. |
||
Consolidation
(Topic 810) |
||
In December
2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-17 codifying the new guidance issued in June
2009 regarding Consolidations. The guidance requires an enterprise to perform
an analysis to determine whether the enterprises variable interest or interests
give it a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity (which would
result in the enterprise being deemed the primary beneficiary of that entity and,
therefore, obligated to consolidate the variable interest entity in its financial
statements); to require ongoing reassessments of whether an enterprise is the primary
beneficiary of a variable interest entity; to revise guidance for determining whether
an entity is a variable interest entity; and to require enhanced disclosures that
will provide more transparent information about an enterprises involvement
with a variable interest entity. The guidance was effective for interim periods
as of the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning after November
15, 2009. The adoption of ASU No. 2009-17 on January 1, 2010 did not have a material
impact on the financial statements. |
||
Subsequent
Events (Topic 855) |
||
In February
2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-09 for amendments to certain recognition and disclosure
requirements. Among other things, this guidance retracts, for public entities, the
requirement to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated
and whether that date is the date the financial statements were issued or were available
to be issued. The portion of the ASU that addresses the disclosure of the date through
which subsequent events have been evaluated, and that impacts the Company, was effective
upon issuance. |
||
4. |
Investment
Securities |
|
The following
table presents the amortized cost, gross unrealized gains, gross unrealized losses
and estimated fair values of investment securities for the periods presented: |
September 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortized | unrealized | unrealized | Fair | Amortized | unrealized | unrealized | Fair | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | cost | gains | losses | value | cost | gains | losses | value | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Available for sale | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury obligations |
$ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 597 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 597 | ||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Government sponsored |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
enterprise obligations |
445,886 | 8,884 | (6 | ) | 454,764 | 198,692 | 1,621 | (583 | ) | 199,730 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate obligations |
8,108 | 764 | - | 8,872 | 8,139 | 378 | - | 8,517 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other bonds and obligations |
13,496 | 209 | (1,347 | ) | 12,358 | 14,625 | 127 | (1,518 | ) | 13,234 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Auction rate certificates |
- | - | - | - | 27,550 | - | (2,755 | ) | 24,795 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Marketable equity securities |
8,089 | 32 | - | 8,121 | 8,567 | 216 | - | 8,783 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trust preferred equity securities |
47,856 | 57 | (12,153 | ) | 35,760 | 48,754 | - | (15,458 | ) | 33,296 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Private label residential mortgage-backed securities |
20,459 | 22 | (1,102 | ) | 19,379 | 23,871 | - | (3,015 | ) | 20,856 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
1,720,767 | 75,341 | - | 1,796,108 | 1,951,297 | 68,393 | (1,643 | ) | 2,018,047 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total available for sale |
2,264,661 | 85,309 | (14,608 | ) | 2,335,362 | 2,282,092 | 70,735 | (24,972 | ) | 2,327,855 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Held to maturity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
288,785 | 11,589 | - | 300,374 | 230,596 | 11,360 | - | 241,956 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other bonds |
9,710 | 362 | - | 10,072 | 10,170 | 243 | (38 | ) | 10,375 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total held to maturity |
298,495 | 11,951 | - | 310,446 | 240,766 | 11,603 | (38 | ) | 252,331 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total securities |
$ | 2,563,156 | $ | 97,260 | $ | (14,608 | ) | $ | 2,645,808 | $ | 2,522,858 | $ | 82,338 | $ | (25,010 | ) | $ | 2,580,186 | ||||||||||||||||
The securities
portfolio is reviewed on a monthly basis for the presence of other-than-temporary
impairment (OTTI). In accordance with OTTI guidance issued by the FASB
in 2009, credit related OTTI for debt securities is recognized in earnings while
non-credit related OTTI is recognized in other comprehensive income (OCI)
if there is no intent to sell or will not be required to sell the security. If an
equity security is deemed other-than-temporarily impaired, the full impairment is
considered to be credit-related and a charge to earnings would be recorded. During
the second and third quarters of 2010, the Company recorded OTTI losses on a debt
security in accordance with this FASB guidance, as described below. |
13
NewAlliance
Bancshares, Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements
During the
three months ended September 30, 2010 and June 30, 2010, a pooled trust preferred
security, which had a previous credit related impairment charge during 2009, was
deemed to have additional credit related OTTI loss in the amount of $378,000 and $552,000,
respectively. These credit related impairments were based on further declines in
expected cash flows and were reclassified from other comprehensive income as they
were previously recognized as non-credit related. Management utilizes nine cash
flow scenarios received from the underwriter to analyze this security for potential
OTTI. The nine scenarios cover various default rates, recovery rates and prepayment
options over different time periods. Two of the nine cash flow analyses continue
to indicate impairment over the life of the security, the driver of which is the
recovery rate, modeled at 0%. Past history of the security indicates that there
have not been any recoveries to date from securities that have defaulted. Based
on these factors, management recorded a credit related impairment of $378,000 in
the third quarter. The credit impairments represent the average loss of the two
negative cash flow analyses at each period. After the write-down, the pooled trust
preferred security had an amortized cost and fair value of approximately $497,000
and $221,000, respectively. There is no intent to sell nor is it more likely than
not that the Company will be required to sell this security. |
||
The following
tables present the fair value of investments with continuous unrealized losses for
less than one year and those that have been in a continuous unrealized loss position
for more than one year as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009. Of the securities
summarized, two issues have an unrealized loss for less than twelve months and 31
have unrealized losses for twelve months or more at September 30, 2010. This compares
to a total of 72 issues that had an unrealized loss at December 31, 2009. |
September 30, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less Than One Year | More Than One Year | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair | Unrealized | Fair | Unrealized | Fair | Unrealized | |||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | value | losses | value | losses | value | losses | ||||||||||||||||||||
U. S. Government sponsored enterprise obligations | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 2,397 | $ | (6 | ) | $ | 2,397 | $ | (6 | ) | ||||||||||||
Corporate obligations | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other bonds and obligations | - | - | 6,729 | (1,347 | ) | 6,729 | (1,347 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Auction rate certificates | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||
Marketable equity securities | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||
Trust preferred equity securities | - | - | 33,203 | (12,153 | ) | 33,203 | (12,153 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Private label residential mortgage-backed securities | 409 | (1 | ) | 17,059 | (1,101 | ) | 17,468 | (1,102 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Residential mortgage-backed securities | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total securities with unrealized losses |
$ | 409 | $ | (1 | ) | $ | 59,388 | $ | (14,607 | ) | $ | 59,797 | $ | (14,608 | ) | |||||||||||
December 31, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less Than One Year | More Than One Year | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair | Unrealized | Fair | Unrealized | Fair | Unrealized | |||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | value | losses | value | losses | value | losses | ||||||||||||||||||||
U. S. Government sponsored enterprise obligations | $ | 83,108 | $ | (542 | ) | $ | 3,774 | $ | (41 | ) | $ | 86,882 | $ | (583 | ) | |||||||||||
Corporate obligations | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other bonds and obligations | 942 | (38 | ) | 6,558 | (1,518 | ) | 7,500 | (1,556 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Auction rate certificates | - | - | 24,795 | (2,755 | ) | 24,795 | (2,755 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Marketable equity securities | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||
Trust preferred equity securities | - | - | 33,296 | (15,458 | ) | 33,296 | (15,458 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Private label residential mortgage-backed securities | - | - | 20,856 | (3,015 | ) | 20,856 | (3,015 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Residential mortgage-backed securities | 246,600 | (1,643 | ) | - | - | 246,600 | (1,643 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Total securities with unrealized losses |
$ | 330,650 | $ | (2,223 | ) | $ | 89,279 | $ | (22,787 | ) | $ | 419,929 | $ | (25,010 | ) | |||||||||||
Management
believes that no individual unrealized loss as of September 30, 2010 represents
an other-than-temporary impairment, based on its detailed monthly review of the
securities portfolio. Among other things, the other-than-temporary impairment review
of the investment securities portfolio focuses on the combined factors of percentage
and length of time by which an issue is below book value as well as consideration
of issuer specific (present value of cash flows expected to be collected, issuer
rating changes and trends, credit worthiness and review of underlying collateral),
broad market details and the Companys intent to sell the security or if it
is more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the debt security
before recovering its cost. The Company also considers whether the depreciation
is due to interest rates or credit risk. The following paragraphs outline the Companys position related to unrealized losses in its investment securities portfolio
at September 30, 2010. |
||
The unrealized
loss on private label residential mortgage-backed securities is primarily concentrated
in one BBB rated private-label mortgage-backed security which is substantially
paid down, well seasoned and of an earlier vintage that has not been significantly
affected by high delinquency levels or vulnerable to lower collateral coverage as
seen in later issued pools. Widening in non-agency mortgage spreads since the date
purchased is the primary factor for the unrealized losses reported on |
14
NewAlliance
Bancshares, Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements
private label
residential mortgage-backed securities. None of the securities are backed by subprime
mortgage loans and none have suffered losses. Other than the BBB rated security,
there is one security rated AA and the remaining securities are AAA rated. Management
reviewed the above factors and issuer specific data and concluded that the private-label
mortgage-backed securities are not other-than-temporarily impaired. |
||
The unrealized
loss on other bonds and obligations primarily relates to a position in an adjustable
rate mortgage mutual fund. During 2009, the Company recorded an OTTI loss of $816,000
on this adjustable rate mortgage mutual fund due to a decrease in the credit quality
of the security coupled with a loss recognized by the fund. As of September 30,
2010, the investment carries a market value to book value ratio of 83.32%, a weighted
average underlying investment credit rating of AAA and it continues to pay normal
monthly dividends. There is no intent to sell nor is it more likely than not that
the Company will be required to sell these securities and management has therefore
concluded that the fund experienced no further OTTI in the nine months ended September
30, 2010. |
||
Trust preferred
securities include two pooled trust preferreds with an amortized cost of $5.2 million,
one of which is rated BB and the other is rated CC at September 30, 2010. During
2009, the Company recorded a credit related impairment of $581,000 on the CC rated
pooled trust preferred security based on a cash flow analysis and subsequent credit
related impairments of $930,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2010
as discussed above. The remaining $42.7 million of trust preferred securities are
comprised of twelve individual names issues with the following ratings: $15.6
million rated A to A-, $25.6 million rated BBB- to BBB and $1.5 million rated BB.
The unrealized losses reported for trust preferred securities relate to the financial
and liquidity stresses in the fixed income markets and in the banking sector and
are not reflective of individual stresses in the individual company names. The ratings
on all of the issues with the exception of the CC rated pooled security have improved
or remained the same since December 31, 2009. Additionally, there have not been
any disruptions in the cash flows of these securities and all are currently paying
the contractual principal and interest payments. A detailed review of the two pooled
trust preferreds and the individual names trust preferred equity securities
was completed by management. This review included an analysis of collateral reports,
cash flows, stress default levels and financial ratios of the underlying issuers.
Management reviewed the above factors and issuer specific data and concluded that
after the OTTI loss recorded on the CC rated pooled trust preferred security, these
securities are not other-than-temporarily impaired. |
||
The Company
has no intent to sell nor is it more likely than not that the Company will be required
to sell any of the securities contained in the table during the period of time necessary
to recover the unrealized losses, which may be until maturity. |
||
The following
table presents the changes in the credit loss component of the amortized cost of
debt securities available for sale that have been written down for other-than-temporary
impairment loss and recognized in earnings. The credit loss component represents
the difference between the present value of expected future cash flows and the amortized
cost basis of the security prior to considering credit losses. |
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||||
Balance, beginning of period | $ | 1,949 | $ | 626 | $ | 1,397 | $ | - | ||||||||||
Additions: | ||||||||||||||||||
Initial credit impairments which were not previously recognized |
||||||||||||||||||
as a component of earnings |
- | - | - | 626 | ||||||||||||||
Subsequent credit impairments |
378 | - | 930 | - | ||||||||||||||
Reductions: | ||||||||||||||||||
Securities sold |
- | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||
Balance, end of period | $ | 2,327 | $ | 626 | $ | 2,327 | $ | 626 | ||||||||||
As of September
30, 2010, the amortized cost and fair values of debt securities and short-term obligations,
by contractual maturity, are shown below. Expected maturities may differ from contracted
maturities because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with
or without call or prepayment penalties. |
15
NewAlliance
Bancshares, Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements
Available for Sale | Held to Maturity | |||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | Amortized cost | Fair value | Amortized cost | Fair value | ||||||||||||||
September 30, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||
Due in one year or less |
$ | 110,969 | $ | 110,229 | $ | 2,540 | $ | 2,565 | ||||||||||
Due after one year through five years |
107,505 | 110,992 | 6,170 | 6,507 | ||||||||||||||
Due after five years through ten years |
246,512 | 252,271 | - | - | ||||||||||||||
Due after ten years |
50,360 | 38,262 | 1,000 | 1,000 | ||||||||||||||
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
1,741,226 | 1,815,487 | 288,785 | 300,374 | ||||||||||||||
Total debt securities |
$ | 2,256,572 | $ | 2,327,241 | $ | 298,495 | $ | 310,446 | ||||||||||
Securities
with a fair value of $743.4 million and $673.8 million at September 30, 2010 and December
31, 2009, respectively, were pledged to secure public deposits, repurchase agreements
and Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston (FHLB) borrowings. |
||
The following
table presents information related to realized gains and losses on sales of securities
available for sale during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and
2009. |
Debt Securities | Equity Securities | |||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||
Realized gains | $ | 599 | $ | 2,050 | $ | 200 | $ | - | ||||||||
Realized losses | - | 21 | - | - | ||||||||||||
Debt Securities | Equity Securities | |||||||||||||||
Nine Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||
Realized gains | $ | 1,349 | $ | 6,192 | $ | 200 | $ | - | ||||||||
Realized losses | - | 53 | - | - | ||||||||||||
5. |
Loans |
|
The composition
of the Companys loan portfolio is as follows: |
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||||
(In thousands) | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||
Residential real estate | $ | 2,521,200 | $ | 2,382,514 | ||||||
Commercial real estate | 1,225,179 | 1,100,880 | ||||||||
Construction | ||||||||||
Residential |
17,359 | 13,789 | ||||||||
Commercial |
94,144 | 132,370 | ||||||||
Commercial business | 513,931 | 411,211 | ||||||||
Consumer | ||||||||||
Home equity and equity lines of credit |
684,007 | 705,673 | ||||||||
Other |
12,862 | 15,608 | ||||||||
Total consumer |
696,869 | 721,281 | ||||||||
Total loans |
5,068,682 | 4,762,045 | ||||||||
Allowance for loan losses |
(54,582 | ) | (52,463 | ) | ||||||
Total loans, net |
$ | 5,014,100 | $ | 4,709,582 | ||||||
As of September
30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Companys residential real estate loan,
residential construction loan, home equity loan and equity lines of credit portfolios
are collateralized by one-to-four family homes and condominiums, the majority of
which are located in Connecticut and Massachusetts. The commercial real estate loan
and commercial construction portfolios are collateralized primarily by multi-family,
commercial and industrial properties located predominately in Connecticut and Massachusetts.
A variety of different assets, including accounts receivable, inventory and property,
plant and |
16
NewAlliance
Bancshares, Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements
equipment,
collateralize the majority of the commercial business loan portfolio. The Company
does not originate or directly invest in subprime loans. |
||
Allowance
for Loan Losses |
||
The following
table provides a summary of activity in the allowance for loan losses for the periods
presented: |
At or For the Three Months | At or For the Nine Months | ||||||||||||||
Ended September 30, | Ended September 30, | ||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||
Balance at beginning of period | $ | 54,945 | $ | 51,502 | $ | 52,463 | $ | 49,911 | |||||||
Provisions charged to operations | 4,000 | 5,433 | 14,300 | 14,533 | |||||||||||
Charge-offs | |||||||||||||||
Residential real estate loans |
1,265 | 960 | 3,610 | 2,449 | |||||||||||
Commercial real estate loans |
1,301 | 392 | 3,295 | 2,389 | |||||||||||
Commercial construction loans |
- | 1,010 | 953 | 3,055 | |||||||||||
Commercial business loans |
1,678 | 3,166 | 4,084 | 5,317 | |||||||||||
Consumer loans |
388 | 490 | 921 | 903 | |||||||||||
Total charge-offs |
4,632 | 6,018 | 12,863 | 14,113 | |||||||||||
Recoveries | |||||||||||||||
Residential real estate loans |
4 | 3 | 15 | 140 | |||||||||||
Commercial real estate loans |
- | 538 | - | 538 | |||||||||||
Commercial construction loans |
- | - | - | - | |||||||||||
Commercial business loans |
235 | 228 | 556 | 519 | |||||||||||
Consumer loans |
30 | 34 | 111 | 192 | |||||||||||
Total recoveries |
269 | 803 | 682 | 1,389 | |||||||||||
Net charge-offs | 4,363 | 5,215 | 12,181 | 12,724 | |||||||||||
Balance at end of period | $ | 54,582 | $ | 51,720 | $ | 54,582 | $ | 51,720 | |||||||
Nonperforming
Assets |
||
Nonperforming
assets include loans that are 90 days or more past due, restructured loans due to
a weakening in the financial condition of the borrower, other loans which have been
identified by the Company as presenting uncertainty with respect to the collectability
of principal or interest and other real estate owned. All of the Companys
nonperforming assets do not accrue interest. |
||
The following
table provides a summary of nonperforming assets for the periods presented: |
September 30, | December 31, | ||||||||
(In thousands) | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Nonaccrual loans | $ | 68,293 | $ | 50,507 | |||||
Other real estate owned | 3,103 | 3,705 | |||||||
Total nonperforming assets |
$ | 71,396 | $ | 54,212 | |||||
Troubled debt restructured loans included in nonaccrual loans above | $ | 8,666 | $ | 3,294 | |||||
17
NewAlliance
Bancshares, Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements
6. |
Goodwill
and Identifiable Intangible Assets |
|
The changes
in the carrying amount of goodwill and identifiable intangible assets are summarized
as follows: |
Identifiable | |||||||||
Intangible | |||||||||
(In thousands) | Goodwill | Assets | |||||||
Balance, December 31, 2008 | $ | 527,167 | $ | 43,860 | |||||
Amortization expense | - | (8,501 | ) | ||||||
Balance, December 31, 2009 | 527,167 | 35,359 | |||||||
Amortization expense | - | (5,858 | ) | ||||||
Balance, September 30, 2010 | $ | 527,167 | $ | 29,501 | |||||
Estimated amortization expense for the year ending: | |||||||||
Remaining 2010 |
$ | 1,952 | |||||||
2011 |
7,556 | ||||||||
2012 |
7,556 | ||||||||
2013 |
7,461 | ||||||||
2014 |
3,617 | ||||||||
2015 |
982 | ||||||||
Thereafter |
377 | ||||||||
The Company completed its annual test for goodwill impairment during the first quarter of 2010 and no impairment charge was deemed necessary. There have been no impairments recorded for goodwill and identifiable intangible assets since inception. | ||
The components of identifiable intangible assets are core deposit and customer relationships and had the following balances at September 30, 2010: |
Original | Balance | ||||||||||||
Recorded | Cumulative | September 30, | |||||||||||
(In thousands) | Amount | Amortization | 2010 | ||||||||||
Core deposit and customer relationships |
$ | 86,908 | $ | 57,407 | $ | 29,501 | |||||||
7. | Other Assets
|
|
Selected components
of other assets are as follows: |
September 30, | December 31, | ||||||||
(In thousands) | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Deferred tax asset, net | $ | 8,113 | $ | 14,078 | |||||
Accrued interest receivable | 31,897 | 33,078 | |||||||
Investments in limited partnerships and other investments | 10,342 | 8,003 | |||||||
Receivables arising from securities transactions | 14,863 | 14,165 | |||||||
Prepaid FDIC assessments | 20,878 | 26,001 | |||||||
All other | 20,901 | 18,616 | |||||||
Total other assets |
$ | 106,994 | $ | 113,941 | |||||
18
NewAlliance
Bancshares, Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements
8. | Deposits | |
A summary
of deposits by account type is as follows: |
September 30, | December 31, | ||||||||
(In thousands) | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Savings | $ | 1,705,787 | $ | 1,817,787 | |||||
Money market | 993,570 | 790,453 | |||||||
NOW | 398,435 | 400,176 | |||||||
Demand | 581,293 | 534,180 | |||||||
Time | 1,459,775 | 1,481,446 | |||||||
Total deposits |
$ | 5,138,860 | $ | 5,024,042 | |||||
9. | Borrowings | |
The following
is a summary of the Companys borrowed funds: |
September 30, | December 31, | ||||||||
(In thousands) | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||
FHLB advances (1) | $ | 1,994,811 | $ | 1,755,533 | |||||
Repurchase agreements | 105,606 | 112,095 | |||||||
Mortgage loans payable | 1,044 | 1,165 | |||||||
Junior subordinated debentures issued to affiliated trusts (2) | 21,135 | 21,135 | |||||||
Total borrowings |
$ | 2,122,596 | $ | 1,889,928 | |||||
(1) | Includes fair value adjustments on acquired borrowings, in accordance with purchase accounting standards of $2.1 million and $3.1 million at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. The acquisition fair value adjustments (premiums) are being amortized as an adjustment to interest expense on borrowings over their remaining terms using the level yield method. | ||
(2) | The trusts were organized to facilitate the issuance of trust preferred securities. The Company acquired these subsidiaries when it acquired Alliance Bancorp of New England, Inc. and Westbank Corporation, Inc. (Westbank). The affiliated trusts are wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company and the payments of these securities are irrevocably and unconditionally guaranteed by the Company. |
FHLB advances
are secured by the Companys investment in FHLB stock, a blanket security agreement
and other eligible investment securities. This agreement requires the Bank to maintain
as collateral certain qualifying assets, principally mortgage loans. Investment
securities currently maintained as collateral are all U.S. Agency mortgage-backed
securities. At September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Bank was in compliance
with the FHLB collateral requirements. At September 30, 2010, the Company could
immediately borrow an additional $217.2 million from the FHLB, inclusive of a line
of credit of approximately $20.0 million. Additional borrowing capacity of approximately $1.51
billion would be available by pledging additional eligible securities as collateral.
The Company also has borrowing capacity at the Federal Reserve Bank of Bostons
discount window, which was approximately $94.4 million as of September 30, 2010,
all of which was available on that date. Repurchase agreements with commercial or
municipal customers or dealer/brokers are secured by the Companys investment
in specific issues of agency mortgage-backed securities and agency obligations of $23.5
million and $101.5 million, respectively, as of September 30, 2010. Repurchase agreement
lines of credit with four large broker-dealers totaled $200.0 million at September
30, 2010, with availability of $175.0 million. At September 30, 2010, all of the
Companys $1.99 billion outstanding FHLB advances were at fixed rates ranging
from 0.34 % to 8.17%. The weighted average rate for all FHLB advances at September
30, 2010 was 3.03%. |
||
10. | Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans | |
The Company
provides various defined benefit and other postretirement benefit plans (postretirement
health and life insurance benefits) to substantially all employees hired prior to
January 1, 2008. The Company also has supplemental retirement plans (the Supplemental
Plans) that provide benefits for certain key executive officers. Benefits
under the supplemental plans are based on a predetermined formula and are reduced
by other benefits. The liability arising from these plans is being accrued over
the participants remaining periods of service so that at the expected retirement
dates, the present value of the annual payments will have been expensed. Due to
the retirement of an executive officer, the Company recorded additional expense
of approximately $1.3 million for the supplemental executive retirement plans in
the third quarter of 2010. |
19
NewAlliance
Bancshares, Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements
The following table presents the amount of net periodic pension cost for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Supplemental | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Executive | Other Postretirement | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Qualified Pension | Retirement Plans | Benefits | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||
Service cost - benefits earned during the period | $ | 853 | $ | 809 | $ | 145 | $ | 112 | $ | 62 | $ | 55 | |||||||||||||
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation | 1,471 | 1,430 | 163 | 194 | 80 | 89 | |||||||||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets | (1,693 | ) | (1,741 | ) | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||
Amortization: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Transition |
- | - | - | - | 13 | 13 | |||||||||||||||||||
Prior service cost |
14 | 13 | 2 | 2 | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||
Loss (gain) |
324 | 204 | 1,322 | - | (40 | ) | (43 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Net periodic benefit cost |
$ | 969 | $ | 715 | $ | 1,632 | $ | 308 | $ | 115 | $ | 114 | |||||||||||||
The following table presents the amount of net periodic pension cost for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009. |
Supplemental | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Executive | Other Postretirement | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Qualified Pension | Retirement Plans | Benefits | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||
Service cost - benefits earned during the period | $ | 2,559 | $ | 2,426 | $ | 422 | $ | 338 | $ | 185 | $ | 164 | |||||||||||||
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation | 4,414 | 4,291 | 510 | 583 | 240 | 268 | |||||||||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets | (5,079 | ) | (5,224 | ) | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||
Amortization: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Transition |
- | - | - | - | 39 | 39 | |||||||||||||||||||
Prior service cost |
40 | 40 | 5 | 5 | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||
Loss (gain) |
972 | 612 | 1,322 | (1 | ) | (120 | ) | (129 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Net periodic benefit cost |
$ | 2,906 | $ | 2,145 | $ | 2,259 | $ | 925 | $ | 344 | $ | 342 | |||||||||||||
In connection with its conversion to a state-chartered stock bank, the Company established an employee stock ownership plan (ESOP) to provide substantially all employees of the Company the opportunity to become stockholders. The ESOP borrowed $109.7 million of a $112.0 million line of credit from the Company and used the funds to purchase 7,454,562 shares of common stock in the open market subsequent to the subscription offering. Loan payments are made quarterly principally from the Banks discretionary contributions to the ESOP. The unallocated ESOP shares are pledged as collateral on the loan which has a maturity date of March 31, 2034. |
|
At September 30, 2010, the loan had an outstanding balance of $95.7 million and an interest rate of 4.0%. The Company accounts for its ESOP in accordance with FASB ASC 718-40, Compensation Stock Compensation. Under this guidance, unearned ESOP shares are not considered outstanding and are shown as a reduction of stockholders equity as unearned compensation. The Company will recognize compensation cost equal to the fair value of the ESOP shares during the periods in which they are committed to be released. To the extent that the fair value of the Companys ESOP shares differs from the cost of such shares, this difference will be credited or debited to equity. The Company will receive a tax deduction equal to the cost of the shares released to the extent of the principal paydown on the loan by the ESOP. As the loan is internally leveraged, the loan receivable from the ESOP to the Company is not reported as an asset nor is the debt of the ESOP shown as a liability in the Companys financial statements. Dividends on unallocated shares are used to pay the ESOP debt. The ESOP compensation expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 was approximately $748,000 and $2.3 million. The ESOP compensation expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 was approximately $733,000 and $2.2 million. The amount of loan repayments made by the ESOP is used to reduce the unallocated common stock held by the ESOP. |
|
The ESOP shares as of September 30, 2010 were as follows: |
Shares released for allocation | 1,598,733 | |||
Unreleased shares | 5,855,829 | |||
Total ESOP shares |
7,454,562 | |||
Market value of unreleased shares at September 30, 2010 (in thousands) | $ | 73,901 |
20
NewAlliance
Bancshares, Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements
Under the terms of the merger agreement with First Niagara, the Company will terminate the ESOP immediately prior to the time the merger becomes effective. The Company will take all necessary actions to extinguish the balance of the ESOP loan as of the merger closing date. |
|
11. | Stock-Based Compensation |
The Company provides compensation benefits to employees and non-employee directors under its 2005 Long-Term Compensation Plan (the LTCP) which was approved by shareholders. The Company accounts for stock-based compensation using the fair value recognition provisions of FASB ASC 718, Compensation - Stock Compensation. Pursuant to this guidance, the fair value of stock option and restricted stock awards, measured at grant date, is amortized to compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting period or over the requisite service period for awards expected to vest. |
|
The LTCP allows for the issuance of up to 11.4 million Options or Stock Appreciation Rights and up to 4.6 million Stock Awards or Performance Awards. As of September 30, 2010, a mix of stock options, restricted stock and performance-based restricted shares were awarded to employees. Due to terms of the pending acquisition agreement with First Niagara, no further awards will be granted and outstanding unvested awards will become fully vested upon the effective time of the merger. |
|
Option Awards | |
Options awarded to date are for a term of ten years and total approximately 10.0 million shares. The majority of these options were awarded on the original award date of June 17, 2005 and these 2005 option awards had the following vesting schedule: 40% vested at year-end 2005 and 20% vested at year-end 2006, 2007 and 2008, respectively. Subsequent awards have vesting periods of either three or four years. The Company assumed a 2.9% average forfeiture rate on options granted subsequent to June 17, 2005 as the majority of the options were awarded to senior level management. Compensation expense recorded on options for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 was $167,000 and $416,000, respectively, or after tax expense of approximately $108,000 and $268,000, respectively. Compensation expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 was $111,000 and $243,000, respectively, or after tax expense of approximately $72,000 and $157,000, respectively, was recorded. The Company anticipates that it will record expense of $576,000 in 2010 and $1.5 million in 2011. The anticipated expense for 2011 factors in the full vesting of outstanding option awards. |
|
Options to purchase 416,568 shares and 473,109 shares were granted to employees during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009, respectively. Using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, the weighted-average grant date fair value was $2.10 and $2.37 per share for the options which were granted in 2010 and 2009, respectively. The weighted-average assumptions for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 are presented in the following table. |
2010 | 2009 | ||||||||
Risk-free interest rate | 2.59 | % | 2.64 | % | |||||
Expected dividend yield | 2.37 | % | 2.15 | % | |||||
Expected volatility | 19.83 | % | 19.32 | % | |||||
Expected life (years) | 6.25 | 6.25 | |||||||
A summary of option activity as of September 30, 2010 and changes during the period ended is presented below. |
Weighted- | ||||||||||||||
Weighted- | Average | Aggregate | ||||||||||||
Average | Remaining | Intrinsic | ||||||||||||
Exercise | Contractual | Value | ||||||||||||
Shares | Price | Term | ($000) | |||||||||||
Options outstanding at beginning of year | 7,884,801 | $ | 14.30 | |||||||||||
Granted | 416,568 | 11.81 | ||||||||||||
Exercised | - | - | ||||||||||||
Forfeited/cancelled | (23,722 | ) | 12.92 | |||||||||||
Expired | (800,264 | ) | 14.39 | |||||||||||
Options outstanding at September 30, 2010 | 7,477,383 | $ | 14.15 | 5.32 | $ | 467 | ||||||||
Options exercisable at September 30, 2010 | 6,603,499 | $ | 14.38 | 4.83 | $ | 16 | ||||||||
21
NewAlliance
Bancshares, Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements
The following table summarizes the nonvested options during the nine months ended September 30, 2010. |
|||||||
Weighted-average | |||||||
Grant-Date | |||||||
Shares | Fair Value | ||||||
Nonvested at January 1, 2010 | 631,154 | $ | 2.38 | ||||
Granted | 416,568 | 2.10 | |||||
Vested | (150,116 | ) | 2.39 | ||||
Forfeited / Cancelled | (23,722 | ) | 2.34 | ||||
Nonvested at September 30, 2010 | 873,884 | $ | 2.25 | ||||
Restricted Stock and Performance-Based Restricted Stock Awards | |
To date, approximately 4.0 million shares of restricted stock have been awarded under the LTCP. The majority of these shares were awarded in 2005 and these 2005 awards have a vesting schedule of 15% per year for six years and 10% in the seventh year. Subsequent awards have vesting schedules of three years, four years, or cliff vest after three years. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company granted approximately 262,000 restricted stock awards. |
|
Performance-based restricted stock shares were awarded to executive management and other key members of senior management during 2010. The vesting for these performance-based awards is conditional upon fulfillment of a market condition and on meeting a service period requirement. The actual number of performance shares to be earned will be based on performance criteria over a three-year performance period which began May 28, 2010 and ending May 31, 2013. Performance shares vest based on total shareholder return (TSR) (defined as share price appreciation from the beginning of the performance period to the end of the performance period, plus the total dividends paid on the common stock during the period) for the group of banks and thrifts listed on the SNL Thrift Index versus the Companys TSR (the TSR Percentage). The performance shares, if earned, will vest on May 31, 2013. A simulation model was used to provide a grant date fair value for the performance-based shares. Expense for the performance-based awards is recognized based on the probability of attaining the performance targets and over the service period similar to the recognition of the expense associated with the other restricted stock awards that only have a service condition. |
|
Total restricted stock compensation expense, including performance shares, for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 was approximately $1.9 million and $1.6 million or after tax expense of approximately $1.4 million and $1.2 million, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, compensation expense was $5.1 million and $4.5 million or after tax expense of approximately $3.9 million and $3.4 million was recorded. Due to the terms of the pending acquisition agreement with First Niagara, additional awards will not be granted. The Company anticipates that it will record expense of approximately $7.0 million during 2010 and $7.6 million in 2011. The anticipated expense for 2011 factors in the full vesting of outstanding stock awards. |
|
The following table summarizes the nonvested restricted stock and performance-based restricted stock awards during the six months ended September 30, 2010. |
Weighted-average | ||||||||
Grant-Date | ||||||||
Shares | Fair Value | |||||||
Nonvested at January 1, 2010 | 1,225,063 | $ | 14.37 | |||||
Granted | 261,755 | 13.39 | ||||||
Vested | (395,928 | ) | 14.29 | |||||
Forfeited / Cancelled | (58,185 | ) | 14.49 | |||||
Nonvested at September 30, 2010 | 1,032,705 | $ | 14.15 | |||||
12. | Income Taxes |
The Company has transactions in which the related tax effect was recorded directly to stockholders equity or goodwill instead of operations, including the tax effects of unrealized gains and losses on available for sale securities and excess tax benefits related to stock awards. Deferred taxes charged to goodwill were in connection with prior acquisitions. The Company had a net deferred tax asset of $8.1 million and $14.1 million at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. |
22
NewAlliance
Bancshares, Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements
As of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Company has a valuation allowance of $826,000 and $1.5 million, respectively, for the tax effect of capital loss carryforwards associated with realized and unrealized capital losses on capital assets, of which $467,000 and $462,000, respectively, was recorded as an adjustment to other comprehensive income and the remainder had an effect on continuing operations. |
|
The components of income tax expense are summarized as follows: |
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Current tax expense | |||||||||||||||||
Federal |
$ | 8,942 | $ | 9,877 | $ | 24,858 | $ | 21,202 | |||||||||
State |
250 | 191 | 672 | 515 | |||||||||||||
Total current |
9,192 | 10,068 | 25,530 | 21,717 | |||||||||||||
Deferred tax expense, net of valuation reserve | |||||||||||||||||
Federal |
(2,338 | ) | (2,152 | ) | (2,831 | ) | (1,912 | ) | |||||||||
State |
(52 | ) | - | (63 | ) | - | |||||||||||
Total deferred |
(2,390 | ) | (2,152 | ) | (2,894 | ) | (1,912 | ) | |||||||||
Total income tax expense |
$ | 6,802 | $ | 7,916 | $ | 22,636 | $ | 19,805 | |||||||||
The allocation of changes in net deferred tax assets involving items charged to income, items charged directly to shareholders equity and items charged to goodwill is as follows: |
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Deferred tax asset allocated to: | |||||||||||||||||
Stockholders equity, tax effect of net unrealized gain on investment securities available for sale, net of valuation allowance |
$ | (289 | ) | $ | 7,425 | $ | 8,860 | $ | 15,946 | ||||||||
Reclass as a result of adoption of new OTTI accounting pronouncement |
- | - | - | 578 | |||||||||||||
Income |
(2,390 | ) | (2,152 | ) | (2,894 | ) | (1,912 | ) | |||||||||
Total change in deferred tax assets, net |
$ | (2,679 | ) | $ | 5,273 | $ | 5,966 | $ | 14,612 | ||||||||
The Company accounts for uncertainty in income taxes in accordance with FASB ASC 740-10. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows: |
September 30, | |||||
(In thousands) | 2010 | ||||
Balance, beginning of period | $ | 400 | |||
Additions for tax positions of current year |
- | ||||
Additions for tax positions of prior year |
- | ||||
Reductions for tax positions of prior year |
(140 | ) | |||
Balance, end of period | $ | 260 | |||
Included in the balance at September 30, 2010 is $260,000 of tax positions for which the ultimate deductibility is highly uncertain and for which the disallowance of the tax position would affect the annual effective tax rate The Company recognizes interest and penalties accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits as a component of income tax expense. As of September 30, 2010, the Company has accrued approximately $65,000 in interest and penalties. |
|||||
The Company is generally no longer subject to federal, state or local income tax examinations by tax authorities for the years before 2006. In the third quarter of 2008, the IRS commenced an examination of the 2006 and 2007 tax years for Westbank. As of September 30, 2010, the IRS has completed the audits of the Westbank 2006 and 2007 tax years as well as the audit of the Companys 2006 and 2007 tax years. There were no adjustments to Westbanks or the Companys tax returns for the audited tax years. |
23
NewAlliance
Bancshares, Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements
13. | Commitments and Contingencies | |||||||
The Company is party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments consist primarily of commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to customers as long as there is no violation of any terms or covenants established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses that may require payment of a fee. The Company monitors customer compliance with commitment terms. Since many of the commitments could expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. These commitments consist principally of unused commercial and consumer lines of credit. Standby letters of credit generally are contingent upon the failure of the customer to perform according to the terms of an underlying contract with a third party. The credit risks associated with commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit are essentially the same as those involved with extending loans to customers and are subject to normal credit policies. Collateral may be obtained based on managements assessment of the customers creditworthiness. |
||||||||
The table below summarizes the Companys commitments and contingencies discussed above. | ||||||||
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
(In thousands) | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||
Loan origination commitments | $ | 252,801 | $ | 146,369 | ||||
Unadvanced portion of construction loans | 70,888 | 40,700 | ||||||
Standby letters of credit | 11,824 | 6,587 | ||||||
Unadvanced portion of lines of credit | 636,837 | 608,854 | ||||||
Total commitments |
$ | 972,350 | $ | 802,510 | ||||
Other Commitments | ||||||||
As of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Company was contractually committed under limited partnership agreements to make additional partnership investments of approximately $1.4 million which constitutes the Companys maximum potential obligation to these partnerships. The Company is obligated to make additional investments in response to formal written requests, rather than a funding schedule. Funding requests are submitted when the partnerships plan to make additional investments. |
||||||||
Legal Proceedings | ||||||||
In the ordinary course of business, we are involved in various threatened and pending legal proceedings. We believe that we are not a party to any pending legal, arbitration, or regulatory proceedings that would have a material adverse impact on our financial results or liquidity. Certain legal proceedings in which we are involved relate to the merger with First Niagara. A description of these legal proceedings can be found in Part II, Item 1. Legal Proceedings, of this report. |
||||||||
14. | Fair Value Measurements | |||||||
Fair value estimates are made as of a specific point in time based on the characteristics of the financial instruments and relevant market information. In accordance with FASB ASC 820, the fair value estimates are measured within the fair value hierarchy. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below: |
Basis of Fair Value Measurement | |||
Level 1 | Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities; |
||
Level 2 | Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability; |
||
Level 3 | Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (i.e. supported by little or no market activity). |
When available, quoted market prices are used. In other cases, fair values are based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques. These techniques involve uncertainties and are significantly affected by the assumptions used and judgments made regarding risk characteristics of various financial instruments, discount rates, estimates of future cash flows, future expected loss experience and other factors. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect these estimates. Derived fair |
24
NewAlliance
Bancshares, Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements
value estimates cannot be substantiated by comparison to independent markets and, in certain cases, could not be realized in an immediate sale of the instrument. |
|
Fair value estimates are based on existing financial instruments without attempting to estimate the value of anticipated future business and the value of assets and liabilities that are not financial instruments. Accordingly, the aggregate fair value amounts presented do not purport to represent the underlying market value of the Company and the difference could be material. |
Fair Value Option | |
FASB ASC 825-10 allows for the irrevocable option to elect fair value accounting for the initial and subsequent measurement for certain financial assets and liabilities on a contract-by-contract basis that may otherwise not be required to be measured at fair value under other accounting standards. The Company elected the fair value option as of January 1, 2009 for its portfolio of mortgage loans held for sale pursuant to forward loan sale commitments originated after January 1, 2009 in order to reduce certain timing differences and better match changes in fair values of the loans with changes in the value of the derivative forward loan sale contracts used to economically hedge them. The fair value option election relating to mortgage loans held for sale did not result in a transition adjustment to retained earnings and instead changes in the fair value have an impact on earnings as a component of noninterest income. |
|
At September 30, 2010, mortgage loans held for sale pursuant to forward loan sale commitments had a fair value of $25.6 million, which includes a positive fair value adjustment of $18,000. For the three months ended September 30, 2010, there were losses from fair value changes of $114,000 and there were gains of $239,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, there were gains from fair value changes of $684,000 and $103,000, respectively. The gains or losses were recorded in non-interest income as mortgage origination activity and loan sale income. |
|
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis | |
The following table details the financial instruments carried at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 and indicates the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques utilized by the Company to determine the fair value. There were no transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 measurements during the quarter ended September 30, 2010. |
September 30, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||
Quoted Prices in | ||||||||||||||||
Active Markets | Significant | Significant | ||||||||||||||
for Identical | Observable | Unobservable | ||||||||||||||
Assets | Inputs | Inputs | ||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | Total | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | ||||||||||||
Securities Available for Sale | ||||||||||||||||
Marketable equity securities |
$ | 8,121 | $ | 621 | $ | 7,500 | $ | - | ||||||||
Bonds and obligations |
475,994 | 450,869 | 25,125 | - | ||||||||||||
Auction rate certificates |
- | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
Trust preferred equity securities |
35,760 | - | 28,810 | 6,950 | ||||||||||||
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
1,815,487 | - | 1,815,487 | - | ||||||||||||
Total Securities Available for Sale | $ | 2,335,362 | $ | 451,490 | $ | 1,876,922 | $ | 6,950 | ||||||||
Mortgage Loans Held for Sale | 25,647 | - | 25,647 | - | ||||||||||||
Mortgage Loan Derivative Assets | 598 | - | 598 | - | ||||||||||||
Mortgage Loan Derivative Liabilities | (87 | ) | - | (87 | ) | - | ||||||||||
25
NewAlliance Bancshares, Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||||
Quoted Prices in | |||||||||||||||||
Active Markets | Significant | Significant | |||||||||||||||
for Identical | Observable | Unobservable | |||||||||||||||
Assets | Inputs | Inputs | |||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | Total | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | |||||||||||||
Securities Available for Sale | |||||||||||||||||
Marketable equity securities |
$ | 8,783 | $ | 1,283 | $ | 7,500 | $ | - | |||||||||
Bonds and obligations |
222,078 | 196,060 | 26,018 | - | |||||||||||||
Auction rate certificates |
24,795 | - | - | 24,795 | |||||||||||||
Trust preferred equity securities |
33,296 | - | 27,924 | 5,372 | |||||||||||||
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
2,038,903 | - | 2,038,903 | - | |||||||||||||
Total Securities Available for Sale | $ | 2,327,855 | $ | 197,343 | $ | 2,100,345 | $ | 30,167 | |||||||||
Mortgage Loans Held for Sale | 12,908 | - | 12,908 | - | |||||||||||||
Mortgage Loan Derivative Assets | 495 | - | 495 | - | |||||||||||||
Mortgage Loan Derivative Liabilities | (75 | ) | - | (75 | ) | - | |||||||||||
The following table presents additional information about assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis for which the Company utilized Level 3 inputs to determine fair value. |
Securities Available for Sale | |||||||||||||||||
For the three months ended | For the nine months ended | ||||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of period | $ | 18,592 | $ | 27,701 | $ | 30,167 | $ | 26,626 | |||||||||
Transfer into Level 3 |
- | - | - | - | |||||||||||||
Total gains (losses) - (realized/unrealized): |
|||||||||||||||||
Included in earnings |
- | - | - | - | |||||||||||||
Included in other comprehensive income |
425 | 197 | 4,385 | 1,356 | |||||||||||||
Settlements |
(12,050 | ) | - | (27,550 | ) | - | |||||||||||
Discount accretion |
4 | 4 | 12 | 11 | |||||||||||||
Principal payments |
(21 | ) | (181 | ) | (64 | ) | (272 | ) | |||||||||
Balance at end of period | $ | 6,950 | $ | 27,721 | $ | 6,950 | $ | 27,721 | |||||||||
The following
is a description of the valuation methodologies used for instruments measured at
fair value. |
|
Securities
Available for Sale: Included in the available for sale category are both debt
and equity securities. The Company utilizes Interactive Data Corp., a third-party,
nationally-recognized pricing service (IDC) to estimate fair value measurements
for 99.7% of this portfolio. The pricing service evaluates each asset class based
on relevant market information considering observable data that may include dealer
quotes, reported trades, market spreads, cash flows, the U.S. Treasury yield curve,
the LIBOR swap yield curve, trade execution data, market prepayment speeds, credit
information and the bonds terms and conditions, among other things, but these
prices are not binding quotes. The fair value prices on all investment securities
are reviewed for reasonableness by management through an extensive process. This
review process was implemented to determine any unusual market price fluctuations
and the analysis includes changes in the LIBOR / swap curve, the treasury curve,
mortgage rates and credit spreads as well as a review of the securities inventory
list which details issuer name, coupon and maturity date. The review resulted in
no adjustments to the IDC pricing as of September 30, 2010. Also, management assessed
the valuation techniques used by IDC based on a review of their pricing methodology
to ensure proper hierarchy classifications. The Companys Level 3 available
for sale debt securities include a pooled trust preferred security and an individual
named trust preferred security which were valued through means other than quoted
market prices due to the fact that these securities were not priced by the pricing
service. The fair value for these securities are based on Level 3 inputs in accordance
with FASB ASC 820. |
26
NewAlliance Bancshares, Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
The major categories of securities available for sale are: |
| Marketable Equity Securities: Included within this category are exchange-traded securities,
including common and preferred equity securities, measured at fair value based on
quoted prices for identical securities in active markets and therefore meet the
Level 1 criteria. Also included are auction rate preferred securities rated AAA,
which are priced at par and are classified as Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy. |
||
| Bonds and obligations: Included within this category are highly liquid government obligations
and government agency obligations that are measured at fair value based on quoted
prices for identical securities in active markets and therefore are classified within
Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. Also included in this category are municipal
obligations, corporate obligations and a mortgage mutual fund where the fair values
are estimated by using pricing models (i.e. matrix pricing) with observable market
inputs including recent transactions and/or benchmark yields or quoted prices of
securities with similar characteristics and are therefore classified within Level
2 of the valuation hierarchy. |
||
| Trust preferred equity securities: Included in this category are two pooled trust preferred securities
and individual name trust preferred securities of financial companies.
One of the pooled trust preferred securities of $3.0 million and an individual name
trust preferred security of $3.9 million are not priced by IDC, both of which are
classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy. The remaining securities are
at Level 2 and are priced by IDC based upon matrix pricing factoring in observable
benchmark yields and issuer spreads. The Company calculates the fair value of the
Level 3 pooled trust preferred security based on a cash flow methodology that uses
the Bloomberg A rated bank yield curve to discount the current expected cash flows.
In order to derive the fair value of the individual name security, the Company uses
the Bloomberg A rated insurance yield curve to discount the current expected cash
flows. Additionally, the low level of the three month LIBOR rate, the general widening
of credit spreads compared to when these securities were purchased and the reduced
level of liquidity in the fixed income markets, were all factors in the determination
of the current fair value market price. |
||
| Mortgage-Backed Securities: The Company owns residential mortgage-backed securities. As there are
no quoted market prices available, the fair values of mortgage backed securities
are based upon matrix pricing factoring in observable benchmark yields and issuer
spreads and are therefore classified within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy. |
||
| Auction Rate Certificates: Through June 30, 2010, the Company owned auction rate certificates
which were pools of government guaranteed student loans issued by state student
loan departments. At June 30, 2010, these securities were priced at par as the Company
tendered its three remaining positions to the underwriter at par as part of their
2008 settlement agreement. Previously, due to the lack of liquidity in the auction
rate market, the Company had been obtaining a price from the market maker that factored
in credit risk and liquidity premiums to determine a current fair value market price.
The auction rate certificates fell into the classification of Level 3 within the
fair value hierarchy. These securities were not priced by the pricing service. |
Mortgage
Loans Held for Sale: Fair values were estimated utilizing quoted prices for
similar assets in active markets. Any change in the valuation of mortgage loans
held for sale is based upon the change in market interest rates between closing
the loan and the measurement date. As the loans are sold in the secondary market,
the market prices are obtained from Freddie Mac and represent a delivery price which
reflects the underlying price Freddie Mac would pay the Company for an immediate
sale on these mortgages. |
|
Derivatives: Derivative instruments related to loans held for sale are carried at fair value.
Fair value is determined through quotes obtained from actively traded mortgage markets.
Any change in fair value for rate lock commitments to the borrower is based upon
the change in market interest rates between making the rate lock commitment and
the measurement date and, for forward loan sale commitments to the investor, is
based upon the change in market interest rates from entering into the forward loan
sales contract and the measurement date. Both the rate lock commitments to the borrowers
and the forward loan sale commitments to investors are derivatives pursuant to the
requirements of FASB ASC 815-10, however, the Company has not designated them as
hedging instruments. Accordingly, they are marked to fair value through earnings. |
27
NewAlliance Bancshares, Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
At September 30, 2010, the effects of fair value measurements for interest rate lock commitment derivatives and forward loan sale commitments were as follows (mortgage loans held for sale are shown for informational purposes only): |
September 30, 2010 | |||||||||
Notional or | |||||||||
Principal | Fair Value | ||||||||
(In thousands) | Amount | Adjustment | |||||||
Rate Lock Commitments | $ | 75,041 | $ | 598 | |||||
Forward Sales Commitments | 77,437 | (87 | ) | ||||||
Mortgage Loans Held for Sale | 25,629 | 18 | |||||||
The Company
sells the majority of its fixed rate mortgage loans with original terms of 15 years
or more on a servicing released basis and receives a servicing released premium
upon sale. The servicing value has been included in the pricing of the rate lock
commitments and loans held for sale. The Company estimates a fallout rate of approximately
10% based upon historical averages in determining the fair value of rate lock commitments.
Although the use of historical averages is based upon unobservable data, the Company
believes that this input is insignificant to the valuation and, therefore, has concluded
that the fair value measurements meet the Level 2 criteria. The collection of upfront
fees from the borrower is the driver of the Companys low fallout rate. If
this practice were to change, the fallout rate would most likely increase and the
Company would reassess the significance of the fallout rate on the fair value measurement. |
|
Assets
and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis |
|
The following
tables detail the financial instruments carried at fair value on a nonrecurring
basis as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 and indicate the fair value
hierarchy of the valuation techniques utilized by the Company to determine the fair
value: |
September 30, 2010 | |||||||||||||||||
Quoted Prices in | |||||||||||||||||
Active Markets | Significant | Significant | |||||||||||||||
for Identical | Observable | Unobservable | |||||||||||||||
Assets | Inputs | Inputs | |||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | Total | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | |||||||||||||
Loan Servicing Rights | $ | 1,707 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 1,707 | |||||||||
Other Real Estate Owned | 3,103 | - | - | 3,103 | |||||||||||||
Impaired Loans | 20,251 | - | - | 20,251 | |||||||||||||
December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||||
Quoted Prices in | |||||||||||||||||
Active Markets | Significant | Significant | |||||||||||||||
for Identical | Observable | Unobservable | |||||||||||||||
Assets | Inputs | Inputs | |||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | Total | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | |||||||||||||
Loan Servicing Rights | $ | 2,063 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 2,063 | |||||||||
Other Real Estate Owned | 3,705 | - | - | 3,705 | |||||||||||||
Impaired Loans | 16,733 | - | - | 16,733 | |||||||||||||
The following
is a description of the valuation methodologies used for instruments measured at
fair value. |
|
Loan
Servicing Rights: A loan servicing right asset represents the amount by which
the present value of the estimated future net cash flows to be received from servicing
loans are expected to more than adequately compensate the Company for performing
the servicing. The fair value of servicing rights is estimated using a present value
cash flow model. The most important assumptions used in the valuation model are
the anticipated rate of the loan prepayments and discount rates. Adjustments are
only recorded when the discounted cash flows derived from the valuation model are
less than the carrying value of the asset. As such, measurement at fair value is
on a nonrecurring basis. Although some assumptions in determining fair value are
based on standards used by market participants, some are based on unobservable inputs
and therefore are classified in Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy. |
28
NewAlliance Bancshares, Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Other
Real Estate Owned: The Company classifies property acquired through foreclosure
or acceptance of deed-in-lieu of foreclosure as other real estate owned in its financial
statements. Upon foreclosure, the property securing the loan is written down to
fair value. The writedown is based upon differences between the appraised value
and the book value. Appraisals are based upon observable market data such as comparable
sale within the real estate market, however assumptions made in determining comparability
are unobservable and therefore these assets are classified as Level 3 within the
valuation hierarchy. |
|
Impaired
Loans: Impaired loans are measured based on the present value of expected future
cash flows discounted at the loans original effective interest rate, at the
loans observable market price or the fair value of the collateral if the loan
is collateral dependent. Consequently, measurement at fair value is on a nonrecurring
basis. These loans are written down through a valuation allowance within the Banks total loan loss reserve allowance. The fair value of these assets are classified
within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy and are estimated based on collateral
values supported by appraisals. |
|
Disclosures
about Fair Value of Financial Instruments |
|
The following
methods and assumptions were used by management to estimate the fair value of each
class of financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value. |
|
Cash
and cash equivalents: Carrying value is assumed to represent fair value for
cash and due from banks and short-term investments, which have original maturities
of 90 days or less. |
|
Investment
securities: Refer to the above discussion on securities |
|
Federal
Home Loan Bank of Boston stock: FHLB Boston stock is a non-marketable equity
security which is assumed to have a fair value equal to its carrying value due to
the fact that it can only be redeemed back to the FHLB Boston at par value. |
|
Loans
held for sale: The fair value of residential mortgage loans held for sale is
estimated using quoted market prices provided by government-sponsored entities as
described above. The fair value of SBA loans is estimated using quoted market prices
from a secondary market broker. |
|
Accrued
income receivable: Carrying value is assumed to represent fair value. |
|
Loans:
The fair value of the net loan portfolio is determined by discounting the estimated
future cash flows using the prevailing interest rates and appropriate credit and
prepayment risk adjustments as of period-end at which similar loans would be made
to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for the same remaining maturities.
The fair value of nonperforming loans is estimated using the Banks prior credit
experience. |
|
Derivative
Assets: Refer to the above discussion on derivatives. |
|
Deposits:
The fair value of demand, non-interest bearing checking, savings and certain
money market deposits is determined as the amount payable on demand at the reporting
date. The fair value of time deposits is estimated by discounting the estimated
future cash flows using rates offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities
as of period-end. |
|
Borrowed
Funds: The fair value of borrowed funds is estimated by discounting the future
cash flows using market rates for similar borrowings. |
|
Derivative
Liabilities: Refer to the above discussion on derivatives. |
29
NewAlliance Bancshares, Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
The following
are the carrying amounts and estimated fair values of the Companys financial
assets and liabilities as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009: |
September 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||
Carrying | Estimated | Carrying | Estimated | ||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | Amounts | Fair Value | Amounts | Fair Value | |||||||||||||
Financial Assets | |||||||||||||||||
Cash and due from banks |
$ | 122,334 | $ | 122,334 | $ | 96,927 | $ | 96,927 | |||||||||
Short-term investments |
50,000 | 50,000 | 50,000 | 50,000 | |||||||||||||
Investment securities |
2,633,857 | 2,645,808 | 2,568,621 | 2,580,186 | |||||||||||||
Loans held for sale |
27,229 | 27,229 | 14,659 | 14,659 | |||||||||||||
Loans, net |
5,014,100 | 5,102,490 | 4,709,582 | 4,779,888 | |||||||||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston stock |
120,821 | 120,821 | 120,821 | 120,821 | |||||||||||||
Accrued income receivable |
31,897 | 31,897 | 33,078 | 33,078 | |||||||||||||
Derivative assets |
598 | 598 | 495 | 495 | |||||||||||||
Financial Liabilities | |||||||||||||||||
Interest and non-interest bearing checking, savings and money market accounts |
$ | 3,679,085 | $ | 3,679,085 | $ | 3,542,774 | $ | 3,542,774 | |||||||||
Time deposits |
1,459,775 | 1,488,533 | 1,481,446 | 1,498,126 | |||||||||||||
Borrowed funds |
2,122,596 | 2,158,905 | 1,889,928 | 1,919,918 | |||||||||||||
Derivative liabilities |
87 | 87 | 75 | 75 | |||||||||||||
15. | Derivative Financial Instruments |
The Company
accounts for derivatives in accordance with FASB ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging, which requires that all derivative instruments be recorded on the consolidated
balance sheets at their fair values. The Company does not enter into derivative
transactions for speculative purposes, does not have any derivatives designated
as hedging instruments, nor is party to a master netting agreement as of September
30, 2010. |
|
Loan
Commitments and Forward Loan Sale Commitments: The Company enters into interest
rate lock commitments with borrowers, to finance residential mortgage loans. Primarily
to mitigate the interest rate risk on these commitments, the Company also enters
into mandatory and best effort forward loan sale delivery
commitments with investors. The interest rate lock commitments and the forward loan
delivery commitments meet the definition of a derivative, however, the Company has
not designated them as hedging instruments. Upon closing the loan, the loan commitment
expires and the Company records a loan held for sale subject to the same forward
loan sale commitment. Prior to January 1, 2009, the Company accounted for loans
held for sale at the lower of cost or fair value in accordance with accounting guidance
for certain mortgage banking activities. Fluctuations in the fair value of loan
commitments, loans held for sale, and forward loan sale commitments generally move
in opposite directions, and the net impact of the changes in these valuations on
net income is generally inconsequential to the financial statements. |
|
The following
table summarizes the Companys derivative positions at September 30. |
2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||||||
Notional or | Notional or | ||||||||||||||||
Principal | Fair Value | Principal | Fair Value | ||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | Amount | Adjustment (1) | Amount | Adjustment (1) | |||||||||||||
Interest Rate Lock Commitments | $ | 75,041 | $ | 598 | $ | 25,330 | $ | 345 | |||||||||
Forward Sales Commitments | 77,437 | (87 | ) | 37,590 | (145 | ) | |||||||||||
(1) An
immaterial portion of these amounts was attributable to changes in instrument-specific
credit risk. |
|
The following
two tables present the fair values of the Companys derivative instruments
and their effect on the Statement of Income: |
30
NewAlliance Bancshares, Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Fair Values of Derivative Instruments |
Asset Derivatives | Liability Derivatives | |||||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, | December 31, | September 30, | December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Balance Sheet | Balance Sheet | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | Location | Fair Value | Fair Value | Location | Fair Value | Fair Value | ||||||||||||||||||
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate contracts |
Other Assets | $ | 598 | $ | 495 | Other Liabilities | $ | 87 | $ | 75 | ||||||||||||||
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments | $ | 598 | $ | 495 | $ | 87 | $ | 75 | ||||||||||||||||
Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Statement of Income | |||||||||||||||||||
For the Three | For the Nine | ||||||||||||||||||
Months Ended | Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | ||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||||||
Amount of Gain or (Loss) | Amount of Gain or (Loss) | ||||||||||||||||||
Location of Gain or (Loss) Recognized | Recognized in Income on | Recognized in Income on | |||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | in Income on Derivatives | Derivatives | Derivatives | ||||||||||||||||
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments | |||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate contracts |
Non-interest income | $ | 414 | $ | (907 | ) | $ | 91 | $ | 200 | |||||||||
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments | $ | 414 | $ | (907 | ) | $ | 91 | $ | 200 | ||||||||||
16. | Stockholders Equity |
At September
30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, stockholders equity amounted to $1.47 billion
and $1.43 billion, respectively, representing 16.7% and 17.0% of total assets, respectively.
The Company paid cash dividends totaling $0.21 per share on common stock during the
nine months ended September 30, 2010. |
|
Dividends | |
The Company
and the Bank are subject to dividend restrictions imposed by various regulators.
Connecticut banking laws limit the amount of annual dividends that the Bank may
pay to the Company to an amount that approximates the Banks net income retained
for the current year plus net income retained for the two previous years. In addition,
the Bank may not declare or pay dividends on, and the Company may not repurchase
any of its shares of its common stock if the effect thereof would cause stockholders equity to be reduced below applicable regulatory capital maintenance requirements
or if such declaration, payment or repurchase would otherwise violate regulatory
requirements. |
|
Treasury Shares | |
Share Repurchase Plan | |
On January
31, 2006, the Companys Board of Directors authorized a repurchase plan of
up to an additional 10.0 million shares or approximately 10% of the then outstanding
Company common stock. Under this plan the Company has repurchased 8,578,062 million
shares of common stock at a weighted average price of $12.80 per share as of September
30, 2010. During 2010, there were approximately 882,000 shares repurchased. There
is no set expiration date for this repurchase plan. Due to the First Niagara impending
acquisition, the Company is not initiating share repurchases. |
|
Other | |
Upon vesting
of shares under the Companys benefit plans, plan participants may choose to
have the Company withhold a number of shares necessary to satisfy tax withholding
requirements. The withheld shares are classified as treasury shares by the Company.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, approximately 91,000 shares were returned
to the Company for this purpose. |
|
Regulatory Capital | |
Capital
guidelines of the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
(FDIC) require the Company and its banking subsidiary to maintain certain
minimum ratios, as set forth below. At September 30, 2010, the Company and the Bank
were deemed to be well capitalized under the regulations of the Federal
Reserve Board and the FDIC, respectively, and in compliance with the applicable
capital requirements. |
|
The following
table provides information on the capital ratios. |
31
NewAlliance Bancshares, Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
To Be Well | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
For Capital | Capitalized Under | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adequacy | Prompt Corrective | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Actual | Purposes | Action Provisions | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | Amount | Ratio | Amount | Ratio | Amount | Ratio | |||||||||||||||||||
NewAlliance Bank | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, 2010 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets) |
$ | 792,652 | 9.7 | % | $ | 327,886 | 4.0 | % | $ | 409,858 | 5.0 | % | |||||||||||||
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) |
792,652 | 17.3 | 183,657 | 4.0 | 275,485 | 6.0 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) |
847,247 | 18.5 | 367,313 | 8.0 | 459,141 | 10.0 | |||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2009 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets) |
$ | 734,951 | 9.3 | % | $ | 317,623 | 4.0 | % | $ | 397,029 | 5.0 | % | |||||||||||||
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) |
734,951 | 16.7 | 176,043 | 4.0 | 264,064 | 6.0 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) |
787,510 | 17.9 | 352,085 | 8.0 | 440,107 | 10.0 | |||||||||||||||||||
NewAlliance Bancshares, Inc. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, 2010 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets) |
$ | 906,768 | 11.1 | % | $ | 328,196 | 4.0 | % | $ | 410,245 | 5.0 | % | |||||||||||||
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) |
906,768 | 19.7 | 183,987 | 4.0 | 275,981 | 6.0 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) |
861,364 | 20.9 | 367,975 | 8.0 | 459,969 | 10.0 | |||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2009 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets) |
$ | 878,553 | 11.1 | % | $ | 318,072 | 4.0 | % | $ | 397,590 | 5.0 | % | |||||||||||||
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) |
878,553 | 19.9 | 176,422 | 4.0 | 264,633 | 6.0 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) |
931,113 | 21.1 | 352,844 | 8.0 | 441,055 | 10.0 | |||||||||||||||||||
17. | Other Comprehensive Income |
The following
table presents the components of other comprehensive income and the related tax
effects for the periods presented: |
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 13,916 | $ | 12,620 | $ | 46,622 | $ | 34,318 | |||||||||
Other comprehensive income, before tax | |||||||||||||||||
Unrealized (losses) gains on securities |
|||||||||||||||||
Unrealized holding (losses) gains, arising during the period |
(866 | ) | 23,233 | 24,658 | 54,680 | ||||||||||||
Reclassification adjustment for gains, included in net income |
(421 | ) | (2,029 | ) | (619 | ) | (5,513 | ) | |||||||||
Non-credit unrealized loss on other-than-temporarily impaired debt securities | - | - | - | (1,896 | ) | ||||||||||||
Credit related other than temporary realized loss transferred out of other comprehensive income |
378 | - | 900 | - | |||||||||||||
Other comprehensive (loss) income, before tax | (909 | ) | 21,204 | 24,939 | 47,271 | ||||||||||||
Income tax benefit (expense), net of valuation allowance | 289 | (7,425 | ) | (8,860 | ) | (16,524 | ) | ||||||||||
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax | (620 | ) | 13,779 | 16,079 | 30,747 | ||||||||||||
Comprehensive income | $ | 13,296 | $ | 26,399 | $ | 62,701 | $ | 65,065 | |||||||||
18. | Earnings Per Share |
The following
table includes the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the periods
presented: |
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands, except per share data) | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 13,916 | $ | 12,620 | $ | 46,622 | $ | 34,318 | |||||||||
Average common shares outstanding for basic EPS | 98,285 | 99,507 | 98,693 | 99,292 | |||||||||||||
Effect of dilutive stock options and unvested stock awards | 202 | 63 | 79 | 6 | |||||||||||||
Average common and common-equivalent shares for dilutive EPS | 98,487 | 99,570 | 98,772 | 99,298 | |||||||||||||
Net income per common share: | |||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.14 | $ | 0.13 | $ | 0.47 | $ | 0.35 | |||||||||
Diluted |
0.14 | 0.13 | 0.47 | 0.35 | |||||||||||||
32
Forward-Looking Statements |
This report
may contain certain forward-looking statements as that term is defined in the U.S.
federal securities laws. |
Forward-looking
statements are based on certain assumptions and describe future plans, strategies,
and expectations of management and are generally identified by use of the word plan, believe, expect, intend, anticipate, estimate, project, or similar expressions. Managements ability to predict results or the actual effects of its plans or strategies
is inherently uncertain. Accordingly, actual results may differ materially from
anticipated results. |
Factors
that could have a material adverse effect on the operations of NewAlliance Bancshares,
Inc. (NewAlliance or the Company) and its subsidiaries include,
but are not limited to: |
| NewAlliances business could be negatively impacted if the merger agreement with First
Niagara were to be terminated; |
|
| Changes
in the interest rate environment may reduce the net interest margin and/or the volumes
and values of loans made or held as well as the value of other financial assets
held; |
|
| General economic
or business conditions, either nationally or regionally, may be less favorable than
expected, resulting in, among other things, a deterioration in credit quality and/or
a reduced demand for credit or other services; |
|
| Adverse
changes may occur in the securities markets impacting the value of NewAlliances
investments; |
|
| Competitive
pressures among depository and other financial institutions may increase significantly
and may decrease the profit margin associated with its business; |
|
| Recent
government initiatives including the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer
Protection Act is expected to have an effect on the financial services industry; |
|
| Other legislative
or regulatory changes, changes in accounting standards and FDIC initiatives, may
adversely affect the businesses in which NewAlliance is engaged; |
|
| Local,
state or federal taxing authorities may take tax positions that are adverse to NewAlliance; |
|
| Competitors
of NewAlliance may have greater financial resources and develop products that enable
them to compete more successfully than NewAlliance; and |
|
| Unfavorable
changes related to economic stress and dislocation may impact the Companys
vendors, counter-parties, and other entities on which the company has a dependence. |
Readers
are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which
speak only as of the date of this report. Except as required by applicable law or
regulation, management undertakes no obligation to update these forward-looking
statements to reflect events or circumstances that occur after the date on which
such statements were made. |
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations |
The following
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations (MD&A) is intended to help the reader understand NewAlliance
Bancshares, Inc., our operations and our present business environment. We believe
transparency and clarity are the primary goals of successful financial reporting.
We remain committed to increasing the transparency of our financial reporting, providing
our stockholders with informative financial disclosures and presenting an accurate
view of our financial disclosures, financial position and operating results. |
MD&A
is provided as a supplement toand should be read in conjunction withour
Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) and the accompanying notes thereto
contained in Part I, Item 1, of this report as well as our Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. The following sections are included in
MD&A: |
| Our
Business a general description of our business, our objectives and regulatory
considerations. |
| Critical
Accounting Estimates a discussion of accounting estimates that require
critical judgments and estimates. |
| Recent
Accounting Changes a discussion of recently adopted accounting pronouncements
or changes. |
| Operating
Results an analysis of our Companys consolidated results of operations
for the periods presented in our Consolidated Financial Statements. |
| Financial
Condition and Management of Market and Interest Rate Risk an overview
of financial condition and market and interest rate risk. |
33
Our Business |
General |
By assets,
NewAlliance is the third largest banking institution headquartered in Connecticut
and the fourth largest based in New England with consolidated assets of $8.83 billion
and stockholders equity of $1.47 billion at September 30, 2010. Its business
philosophy is to operate as a community bank with local decision-making authority.
NewAlliance delivers financial services to individuals, families and businesses
throughout Connecticut and Western Massachusetts through its 88 banking offices,
104 ATMs and internet website (www.newalliancebank.com). NewAlliance common stock
is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol NAL. |
NewAlliance
has a relentless commitment to improve the financial well-being of the people and
businesses in the markets we serve, and to invest in the communities where they
reside and work. We accomplish this by operating a community banking business model
with a commitment to be a leader in our markets by seeking to continually deliver
superior value to our customers, shareholders, employees and communities. |
The Companys results of operations depend primarily on net interest income, which is the
difference between the income earned on its loan and securities portfolios and its
cost of funds, consisting of the interest paid on deposits and borrowings. Results
of operations are also affected by the Companys provision for loan losses,
income and expenses pertaining to other real estate owned, gains and losses from
sales of loans and securities and non-interest income and expenses. Non-interest
income primarily consists of fee income from depositors, wealth management services,
mortgage origination and loan sale income and increases in cash surrender value
of bank owned life insurance (BOLI). Non-interest expenses consist principally
of compensation and employee benefits, occupancy, data processing, amortization
of acquisition related intangible assets, marketing, professional services, FDIC
insurance assessments and other operating expenses. |
Results
of operations are also significantly affected by general economic and competitive
conditions and changes in interest rates as well as government policies and actions
of regulatory authorities. Future changes in applicable laws, regulations or government
policies may materially affect the Company. |
Our Objectives |
NewAlliance
seeks to continually deliver superior value to its customers, stockholders, employees
and communities through achievement of its core operating objectives which are to: |
| Grow and
retain primary households to increase core deposit relationships with a focus on
checking, savings and money market accounts; |
|
| Build high
quality, profitable loan portfolios using organic and purchase strategies; |
|
| Build and
diversify revenue streams through development of banking-related fee income and
growth in wealth management services; |
|
| Maintain
expense discipline and improve operating efficiencies; |
|
| Invest
in technology to enhance superior customer service and products; and |
|
| Maintain
a rigorous risk identification and management process. |
Significant
factors management reviews to evaluate achievement of the Companys operating
objectives and its operating results and financial condition include, but are not
limited to: net income and earnings per share, performance of acquisitions and integration
activities, return on equity and assets, net interest margin, non-interest income,
operating expenses related to total assets and efficiency ratio, asset quality,
loan and deposit growth, capital management, liquidity and interest rate sensitivity
levels, customer service standards, market share and peer comparisons. |
Regulatory Considerations |
NewAlliance
and its subsidiaries are subject to numerous examinations by federal and state banking
regulators, as well as the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Financial
Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). Please refer to NewAlliances
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 for additional disclosures
with respect to laws and regulations affecting the Companys businesses. |
NewAlliance
is also subject to recent government initiatives. In July the U.S. Senate passed
and the President signed into law, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer
Protection Act. Although NewAlliances asset size is below the threshold for |
34
some of
the new reforms such as regulation by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) and the Durbin Amendment on interchange fees, the legislation could
have a significant effect on the Company. The change in the FDIC assessment formula
will probably be neutral for the Company and, in addition to being compliant with
existing rules for corporate governance and executive compensation practices, the
Company is also already in compliance with many of the new rules. NewAlliance would
be subject to any new rules written by the CFPB governing all banks and compliance
costs are expected to rise. The Company will continue to analyze the impact of this
act as more information becomes available. Until such time, the Company is unable
to fully analyze the impact that the act will have on its financial results. |
Critical Accounting Estimates |
Our Consolidated
Financial Statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America. In connection with the preparation of
our financial statements, we are required to make assumptions and estimates about
future events, and apply judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities,
revenue, expenses and the related disclosures. We base our assumptions, estimates
and judgments on historical experience, current trends and other factors that management
believes to be relevant at the time our Consolidated Financial Statements are prepared.
On a regular basis, management reviews the accounting policies, assumptions, estimates
and judgments to ensure that our financial statements are presented fairly and in
accordance with GAAP. However, because future events and their effects cannot be
determined with certainty, actual results could differ from our assumptions and
estimates, and such differences could be material. We believe that our most critical accounting policies, and those which involve the most complex subjective decisions or assessments relate to income taxes, pension and other postretirement benefits, goodwill and intangible assets, the allowance for loan losses and other-than-temporary impairment of investments. None of the Companys critical accounting estimates have changed during the quarter. A brief description of our current policies involving significant management judgment follows: |
Other-Than-Temporary Impairment of Investments |
We conduct
a periodic review of our investment securities portfolio to determine if the value
of any security has declined below its cost or amortized cost, and whether such
decline is other-than-temporary. For equity securities, if such decline is deemed
other-than-temporary, the security is written down to a new cost basis and the resulting
loss is reported within non-interest income in the consolidated statement of income.
For debt securities, if such decline is deemed other-than-temporary, the investment
is written down for the portion of the impairment related to the estimated credit
loss within non-interest income and the non-credit related impairment is recognized
in other comprehensive income unless required to sell or there is intent to sell,
in which case the entire loss would be recorded within non-interest income. Factors
considered by management include, but are not limited to: percentage and length
of time which an issue is below book value, the financial condition and near-term
prospects of the issuer including their ability to meet contractual obligations
in a timely manner, ratings of the security, whether the decline in fair value appears
to be issuer specific or, alternatively, a reflection of general market or industry
conditions, whether the decline is due to interest rates and spreads or credit risk,
the value of the underlying collateral and our intent and ability to retain the
security for a period of time sufficient to allow for the anticipated recovery in
market value or more likely than not will be required to sell a debt security before
its anticipated recovery which may be until maturity. Adverse changes in the factors
used to determine that a security was not other-than-temporarily impaired could
lead to additional impairment charges. |
Allowance for Loan Losses |
The allowance
for loan losses reflects managements best estimate of probable losses inherent
in the loan portfolio. The adequacy of the allowance is determined based upon a
detailed evaluation of the portfolio and sub-portfolios through a process which
considers numerous factors, including levels and direction of delinquencies, non-performing
loans and assets, risk ratings, estimated credit losses using both internal and
external portfolio reviews, current economic and market conditions, concentrations,
portfolio volume and mix, changes in underwriting, experience of staff, historical
loss rates over the business cycle and current economic trends. All of these factors
may be susceptible to significant change. |
Income Taxes |
Management
uses the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes in which deferred
tax assets and liabilities are established for the temporary differences between
the financial reporting basis and the tax basis of the Companys assets and
liabilities. |
Significant
management judgment is required in determining income tax expense and deferred tax
assets and liabilities. Some judgments are subjective and involve estimates and
assumptions about matters that are inherently uncertain. In determining the valuation
allowance, we use forecasted future operating results, based upon approved business
plans, including a review of the eligible carryforward periods, tax planning opportunities
and other relevant considerations. Management believes that the accounting estimate
related to the valuation allowance is a critical accounting estimate because the
underlying assumptions can |
35
change from
period to period. For example, tax law changes or variances in future projected
operating performance could result in a change in the valuation allowance. The reserve for tax contingencies contains uncertainties because management is required to make assumptions and to apply judgment to estimate the exposures associated with our various tax positions. The effective income tax rate is also affected by changes in tax law, entry into new tax jurisdictions, the level of earnings and the results of tax audits. |
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits |
Management
uses key assumptions that include discount rates, expected return on plan assets,
benefits earned, interest costs, mortality rates, increases in compensation, and
other factors. The two most critical assumptionsestimated return on plan assets
and the discount rateare important elements of plan expense and asset/liability
measurements. These critical assumptions are evaluated at least annually on a plan
basis. Other assumptions are evaluated periodically and are updated to reflect actual
experience and expectations for the future. |
Goodwill and Identifiable Intangible Assets |
We evaluate
goodwill and identifiable intangible assets for impairment annually or whenever
events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of the goodwill or
identifiable intangible assets may be impaired. We complete our impairment evaluation
by performing internal valuation analyses based on discounted cash flow modeling
techniques, considering publicly available market information and using an independent
valuation firm, as appropriate. These types of analyses contain uncertainties because
they require management to make assumptions and to apply judgment to estimate industry
economic factors and the profitability of future business strategies. A complete discussion of critical accounting estimates can be found in the Companys most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K (fiscal year ended December 31, 2009). |
Recent Accounting Changes |
We have adopted
the following new accounting pronouncements and authoritative guidance during 2010.
Except as indicated, the adoption of the following pronouncements did not have a
material impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements. |
FASB ASU 2010-06,
Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements. This guidance amends
Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. The guidance requires
additional disclosures about fair value measurements including transfer in and out
of Levels 1 and 2 and higher levels of disaggregation for the different types of
financial instruments. For the reconciliation of Level 3 fair values measurements,
information about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements should be presented
separately. |
FASB ASU 2009-16,
an update to Topic 860 Transfer of Financial Assets. This guidance
requires entities to provide more information about sales of securitized financial
assets and similar transactions, particularly if the seller retains some risk in
the assets. The guidance eliminates the concept of a qualifying special-purpose
entity, changes the requirements for the derecognition of financial assets, and
enhances the disclosure requirements for sellers of the assets. |
FASB ASU No.
2009-17, an update to Topic 810 Consolidations. The guidance requires
an enterprise to perform an analysis to determine whether the enterprises
variable interest or interests give it a controlling financial interest in a variable
interest entity (which would result in the enterprise being deemed the primary beneficiary
of that entity and, therefore, obligated to consolidate the variable interest entity
in its financial statements); to require ongoing reassessments of whether an enterprise
is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity; to revise guidance for
determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity; and to require enhanced
disclosures that will provide more transparent information about an enterprises
involvement with a variable interest entity. |
FASB ASU 2010-09,
an update to Topic 855 Subsequent Events. The guidance updates certain
recognition and disclosure requirements. Among other things, this guidance retracts,
for public entities, the requirement to disclose the date through which subsequent
events have been evaluated and whether that date is the date the financial statements
were issued or were available to be issued. |
36
Operating Results |
Executive Overview |
The Company
entered into a merger agreement on August 18, 2010, whereby First Niagara Financial
Group Inc. (First Niagara) will acquire the Company in a stock and cash
transaction. The merger agreement has been unanimously approved by the board of
directors and upon all other required approvals and customary closing conditions,
the Company anticipates the merger to be complete early in the second quarter of
2011. In reaching its conclusion to adopt the merger agreement, the Companys
board of directors considered a number factors, including, among others, the following: |
| the boards understanding of, and the presentations of the Companys management
and its financial advisor regarding each of NewAlliances and First Niagaras business, operations, management, financial condition, asset quality, earnings
and prospects; |
|
| the boards knowledge of the current and prospective environment in which the Company
operates; |
|
| the boards conclusion that First Niagaras earnings and prospects make it more
likely that the combined company will have superior future earnings and prospects
compared to the Companys earnings and prospects on a stand-alone basis; |
|
| managements view that the merger will allow for enhanced opportunities for NewAlliances clients and customers; and |
|
| First Niagaras commitment to continue a significant presence in Connecticut. |
Further
information about the merger agreement can be found in the Note 2 in the Notes to
Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements located under Part I, Item I, Financial Statements. |
The Companys strategy until the acquisition is closed will be business as usual, focusing
on core deposit account generation and originating quality loans while maintaining
credit quality and prudent risk management practices. The Company is also committed
to the integration process to ensure a smooth and seamless transition for all of
its customers. |
Third quarter
results reflect the continued momentum in asset growth and earnings that the Company
has experienced all year. Earnings for the third quarter of 2010 were $13.9 million,
or $0.14 per diluted share, compared to $12.6 million, or $0.13 per diluted share,
for the third quarter in 2009. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and
2009 the Company recorded earnings of $46.6 million, or $0.47 per diluted share,
and $34.3 million, or $0.35 per diluted share, respectively. Additionally, in the
third quarter, the Company had a significant increase in due-diligence and merger
related costs in the amount of $3.0 million, net of tax, or $0.030 per diluted share.
Without these costs, third quarter earnings would have been a record of $16.9 million,
or $0.17 per diluted share. |
On a year-to-date
basis, earnings have been incremently accentuated by a second quarter gain on a
limited partnership investment of $2.6 million, or $1.7 million net of tax, and
a gain of $2.6 million from the receipt of tax-exempt life insurance proceeds in
the first quarter. Excluding these two gain items as well as due-diligence and merger
related costs, earnings for the nine months ended would have been $45.7 million,
or $0.46 per diluted share. The limited partnership gain was primarily related to
an underlying investment in one of the partnerships which completed an initial public
offering in June and merger related costs primarily concern the First Niagara merger. |
The Companys net interest margin for the three months ended September 30, 2010 was 3.08%,
an increase of 37 basis points over the prior year quarter of 2.71%. The net interest
margin for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was 3.02% compared to 2.63%
for the same period in 2009. The current year trends impacting the margin have been
growth in the average balance of interest-earning assets and reductions in the Companys cost of funds, particularly deposits. The reduction in the cost of funds
has been the foremost driver of the increase in net interest income and the margin,
mainly due to repricing or maturing of interest-bearing liabilities outpacing interest-earning
assets and the change in the mix of deposits from higher cost time deposits to core
deposits. For both the current quarter and year-to-date periods, the average cost
of deposits and borrowings has declined by more than double that of the decline
in the average yield earned on interest-earning assets. A sustained period of low
interest rates is anticipated, therefore, as interest-earning assets continue to
originate or reprice downward, the net interest margin could be adversely affected. |
The Companys balance sheet growth has been due in part to targeted marketing efforts.
Total loans increased from December 31, 2009 by $306.6 million primarily due to
commercial business loans, residential real estate and commercial real estate loans
increasing $102.7 million, $142.3 million and $86.1 million, respectively. The Company
had record loan originations of $597.6 million for the quarter and $1.52 billion
year to date. The increase in commercial business loans was primarily due to the
Companys asset based lending business which began in the fourth quarter of
2009. Core deposit generation also continues to be strong for the Company, increasing
$136.5 million from December 31, 2009. Total deposits increased $114.8 million from
year-end 2009. |
37
The asset
quality of our loan portfolio has remained strong even as the leading economic indicators
have provided mixed results as evidenced in part by the continued high unemployment
and foreclosure rates throughout the country. The Company has been adversely impacted
by these trends but not to the severity experienced nationally. The allowance for
loan losses to total loans ratio was 1.08% and 1.10% and the ratio of nonperforming
loans to total loans was 1.35% and 1.06% at September 30, 2010 and December 31,
2009, respectively. Net charge-offs for the three months ended September 30, 2010
were $4.4 million, or 0.35% of total average loans compared to $5.2 million, or
0.43% of average loans for the quarter ended September 30, 2009. For the nine months
ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, net charge-offs were $12.2 million and $12.7
million, respectively, and as a percent to total average loans were 0.33% and 0.34%,
respectively. A provision for loan losses of $4.0 million was recorded for the current
quarter compared to $5.4 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2009. |
Selected financial data, ratios and per share data are provided in Table 1. |
Table 1: Selected Data | ||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands, except share data) | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||
Condensed Income Statement | ||||||||||||||||
Interest and dividend income | $ | 88,420 | $ | 92,268 | $ | 262,880 | $ | 281,104 | ||||||||
Interest expense | 28,074 | 40,506 | 89,152 | 131,422 | ||||||||||||
Net interest income before provision for loan losses | 60,346 | 51,762 | 173,728 | 149,682 | ||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses | 4,000 | 5,433 | 14,300 | 14,533 | ||||||||||||
Net interest income after provision for loan losses | 56,346 | 46,329 | 159,428 | 135,149 | ||||||||||||
Non-interest income | 14,618 | 16,449 | 45,904 | 46,003 | ||||||||||||
Operating expenses | 45,661 | 42,238 | 130,985 | 127,002 | ||||||||||||
Merger related charges | 4,585 | 4 | 5,089 | 27 | ||||||||||||
Income before income taxes | 20,718 | 20,536 | 69,258 | 54,123 | ||||||||||||
Income tax provision | 6,802 | 7,916 | 22,636 | 19,805 | ||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 13,916 | $ | 12,620 | $ | 46,622 | $ | 34,318 | ||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding | ||||||||||||||||
Basic |
98,284,937 | 99,506,517 | 98,693,007 | 99,292,067 | ||||||||||||
Diluted |
98,486,667 | 99,569,908 | 98,771,797 | 99,298,399 | ||||||||||||
Earnings per share | ||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.14 | $ | 0.13 | $ | 0.47 | $ | 0.35 | ||||||||
Diluted |
0.14 | 0.13 | 0.47 | 0.35 | ||||||||||||
Financial Ratios | ||||||||||||||||
Return on average assets (1) | 0.64 | % | 0.59 | % | 0.72 | % | 0.54 | % | ||||||||
Return on average equity (1) | 3.79 | 3.57 | 4.28 | 3.27 | ||||||||||||
Net interest margin (1) | 3.08 | 2.71 | 3.02 | 2.63 | ||||||||||||
Dividend payout ratio | 50.00 | 53.85 | 44.68 | 60.00 | ||||||||||||
Average equity to average assets ratio | 16.77 | 16.57 | 16.92 | 16.51 | ||||||||||||
Non-GAAP Ratios | ||||||||||||||||
Efficiency ratio (2) | 67.29 | 63.61 | 62.64 | 66.30 | ||||||||||||
Tangible common equity ratio (3) | 11.09 | 10.82 | 11.09 | 10.82 | ||||||||||||
Per share data | ||||||||||||||||
Book value per share | $ | 14.02 | $ | 13.39 | $ | 14.02 | $ | 13.39 | ||||||||
Tangible book value per share | 8.72 | 8.09 | 8.72 | 8.09 | ||||||||||||
(1) | Annualized. |
(2) | The efficiency
ratio represents the ratio of non-interest expenses, net of OREO expenses, to the
sum of net interest income before provision for loan losses and non-interest income,
excluding security and limited partnership net gains or losses. The efficiency ratio
is not a financial measurement required by accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America. However, management believes such information is
a useful tool to investors in evaluating how effectively the Company generates revenue. |
(3) | The tangible
common equity ratio excludes goodwill and identifiable intangible assets. This ratio
is not a financial measurement required by accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America. However, management believes such information is
useful to analyze the relative strength of NewAlliances capital position and
is useful to investors in evaluating Company performance due to the importance that
analysts placed on the ratio since the introduction of TARP. |
38
Average Balances, Interest, Average Yields/Cost and Rate/Volume Analysis |
Tables
2 and 3 below set forth certain information concerning average interest-earning
assets and interest-bearing liabilities and their associated yields or rates for
the periods indicated. The average yields and costs are derived by dividing annualized
income or expenses by the average balances of interest-earning assets or interest-bearing
liabilities, respectively, for the periods shown and reflect annualized yields and
costs. Average balances are computed using daily balances. Yields and amounts earned
include loan fees and fair value adjustments related to acquired loans, deposits
and borrowings. Loans held for sale and nonaccrual loans have been included in interest-earning
assets for purposes of these computations. |
Table 4
below presents the extent to which changes in interest rates and changes in volume
of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities have affected the Companys interest income and interest expense during the periods indicated. Information
is provided in each category with respect to: (i) change attributable to change
in volume (change in volume multiplied by prior rate), (ii) change attributable
to change in rate (change in rate multiplied by prior volume); and (iii) the change
attributable to rate and volume (change in rate multiplied by change in volume),
which is prorated between the changes in rate and volume. |
Table 2: Average Balance Sheets for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 |
Three Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Average | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Yield/ | Average | Yield/ | |||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | Balance | Interest | Rate | Balance | Interest | Rate | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest-earning assets | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential real estate |
$ | 2,548,169 | $ | 30,288 | 4.75 | % | $ | 2,462,668 | $ | 31,983 | 5.19 | % | ||||||||||||
Commercial real estate |
1,290,757 | 18,994 | 5.89 | 1,212,759 | 17,791 | 5.87 | ||||||||||||||||||
Commercial business |
498,386 | 6,846 | 5.49 | 437,842 | 5,419 | 4.95 | ||||||||||||||||||
Consumer |
699,089 | 7,826 | 4.48 | 737,405 | 8,517 | 4.62 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total loans |
5,036,401 | 63,954 | 5.08 | 4,850,674 | 63,710 | 5.25 | ||||||||||||||||||
Fed funds sold and other short-term investments |
81,825 | 46 | 0.22 | 87,864 | 63 | 0.29 | ||||||||||||||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston stock |
120,821 | - | - | 120,821 | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||
Securities |
2,598,638 | 24,420 | 3.76 | 2,579,856 | 28,495 | 4.42 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total
securities, short-term investments |
2,801,284 | 24,466 | 3.49 | 2,788,541 | 28,558 | 4.10 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total interest-earning assets |
7,837,685 | $ | 88,420 | 4.51 | % | 7,639,215 | $ | 92,268 | 4.83 | % | ||||||||||||||
Non-interest earning assets |
924,054 | 899,599 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 8,761,739 | $ | 8,538,814 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing liabilities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deposits |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Money Markets |
$ | 950,315 | $ | 2,109 | 0.89 | % | $ | 621,017 | $ | 2,419 | 1.56 | % | ||||||||||||
NOW |
383,105 | 210 | 0.22 | 366,770 | 280 | 0.31 | ||||||||||||||||||
Savings |
1,741,628 | 2,255 | 0.52 | 1,878,458 | 5,701 | 1.21 | ||||||||||||||||||
Time |
1,460,894 | 7,433 | 2.04 | 1,512,703 | 10,530 | 2.78 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing deposits |
4,535,942 | 12,007 | 1.06 | 4,378,948 | 18,930 | 1.73 | ||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase agreements |
102,960 | 348 | 1.35 | 127,307 | 375 | 1.18 | ||||||||||||||||||
FHLB advances and other borrowings |
1,986,248 | 15,719 | 3.17 | 1,988,712 | 21,201 | 4.26 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
6,625,150 | 28,074 | 1.69 | % | 6,494,967 | 40,506 | 2.49 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Non-interest-bearing demand deposits |
582,066 | 532,766 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other non-interest-bearing liabilities |
85,407 | 96,393 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities |
7,292,623 | 7,124,126 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity |
1,469,116 | 1,414,688 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and equity |
$ | 8,761,739 | $ | 8,538,814 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest-earning assets |
$ | 1,212,535 | $ | 1,144,248 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income |
$ | 60,346 | $ | 51,762 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate spread |
2.82 | % | 2.34 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest margin (net interest income |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
as a percentage of total interest-earning assets) |
3.08 | % | 2.71 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Ratio of total interest-earning assets |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
to total interest-bearing liabilities |
118.30 | % | 117.62 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
39
Table 3: Average Balance Sheets for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 |
Nine Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Average | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Yield/ | Average | Yield/ | |||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | Balance | Interest | Rate | Balance | Interest | Rate | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest-earning assets | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential real estate |
$ | 2,456,576 | $ | 89,561 | 4.86 | % | $ | 2,522,403 | $ | 100,358 | 5.30 | % | ||||||||||||
Commercial real estate |
1,271,457 | 55,909 | 5.86 | 1,213,877 | 52,855 | 5.81 | ||||||||||||||||||
Commercial business |
449,952 | 17,631 | 5.22 | 443,564 | 16,658 | 5.01 | ||||||||||||||||||
Consumer |
707,867 | 23,908 | 4.50 | 739,600 | 25,821 | 4.65 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total loans |
4,885,852 | 187,009 | 5.10 | 4,919,444 | 195,692 | 5.30 | ||||||||||||||||||
Fed funds sold and other short-term investments |
80,437 | 112 | 0.19 | 93,336 | 342 | 0.49 | ||||||||||||||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston stock |
120,821 | - | - | 120,821 | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||
Securities |
2,574,568 | 75,759 | 3.92 | 2,456,203 | 85,070 | 4.62 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total securities, short-term investments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
and federal home loan bank stock |
2,775,826 | 75,871 | 3.64 | 2,670,360 | 85,412 | 4.26 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total interest-earning assets |
7,661,678 | $ | 262,880 | 4.57 | % | 7,589,804 | $ | 281,104 | 4.94 | % | ||||||||||||||
Non-interest earning assets |
924,097 | 889,869 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 8,585,775 | $ | 8,479,673 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing liabilities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deposits |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Money Markets |
$ | 912,554 | $ | 6,651 | 0.97 | % | $ | 515,048 | $ | 6,500 | 1.68 | % | ||||||||||||
NOW |
380,160 | 710 | 0.25 | 360,717 | 777 | 0.29 | ||||||||||||||||||
Savings |
1,780,461 | 8,496 | 0.64 | 1,729,690 | 19,125 | 1.47 | ||||||||||||||||||
Time |
1,433,546 | 22,496 | 2.09 | 1,617,893 | 36,646 | 3.02 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing deposits |
4,506,721 | 38,353 | 1.13 | 4,223,348 | 63,048 | 1.99 | ||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase agreements |
104,368 | 1,038 | 1.33 | 142,383 | 1,302 | 1.22 | ||||||||||||||||||
FHLB advances and other borrowings |
1,881,762 | 49,761 | 3.53 | 2,109,595 | 67,072 | 4.24 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
6,492,851 | 89,152 | 1.83 | % | 6,475,326 | 131,422 | 2.71 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Non-interest-bearing demand deposits |
556,865 | 510,430 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other non-interest-bearing liabilities |
83,768 | 94,222 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities |
7,133,484 | 7,079,978 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity |
1,452,291 | 1,399,695 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and equity |
$ | 8,585,775 | $ | 8,479,673 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest-earning assets |
$ | 1,168,827 | $ | 1,114,478 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income |
$ | 173,728 | $ | 149,682 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate spread |
2.74 | % | 2.23 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest margin (net interest income |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
as a percentage of total interest-earning assets |
3.02 | % | 2.63 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Ratio of total interest-earning assets |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
to total interest-bearing liabilities |
118.00 | % | 117.21 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
40
Table 4: Rate/Volume Analysis
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, 2010 | September 30, 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Compared to | Compared to | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, 2009 | September 30, 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Increase (Decrease) | Increase (Decrease) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Due to | Due to | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | Rate | Volume | Net | Rate | Volume | Net | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest-earning assets | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential real estate |
$ | (2,778 | ) | $ | 1,083 | $ | (1,695 | ) | $ | (8,230 | ) | $ | (2,567 | ) | $ | (10,797 | ) | |||||||
Commercial real estate |
55 | 1,148 | 1,203 | 526 | 2,528 | 3,054 | ||||||||||||||||||
Commercial business |
632 | 795 | 1,427 | 731 | 242 | 973 | ||||||||||||||||||
Consumer |
(257 | ) | (434 | ) | (691 | ) | (825 | ) | (1,088 | ) | (1,913 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total loans |
(2,348 | ) | 2,592 | 244 | (7,798 | ) | (885 | ) | (8,683 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Fed funds sold and other short-term investments |
(13 | ) | (4 | ) | (17 | ) | (188 | ) | (42 | ) | (230 | ) | ||||||||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston stock |
- | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||
Securities |
(4,281 | ) | 206 | (4,075 | ) | (13,261 | ) | 3,950 | (9,311 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Total securities, short-term investments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
and federal home loan bank stock |
(4,294 | ) | 202 | (4,092 | ) | (13,449 | ) | 3,908 | (9,541 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Total interest-earning assets |
$ | (6,642 | ) | $ | 2,794 | $ | (3,848 | ) | $ | (21,247 | ) | $ | 3,023 | $ | (18,224 | ) | ||||||||
Interest-bearing liabilities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deposits |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Money market |
$ | (1,288 | ) | $ | 978 | $ | (310 | ) | $ | (3,497 | ) | $ | 3,648 | $ | 151 | |||||||||
NOW |
(81 | ) | 11 | (70 | ) | (107 | ) | 40 | (67 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Savings |
(3,058 | ) | (388 | ) | (3,446 | ) | (11,174 | ) | 545 | (10,629 | ) | |||||||||||||
Time |
(2,747 | ) | (350 | ) | (3,097 | ) | (10,322 | ) | (3,828 | ) | (14,150 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total interest bearing deposits |
(7,174 | ) | 251 | (6,923 | ) | (25,100 | ) | 405 | (24,695 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Repurchase agreements |
51 | (78 | ) | (27 | ) | 107 | (371 | ) | (264 | ) | ||||||||||||||
FHLB advances and other borrowings |
(5,456 | ) | (26 | ) | (5,482 | ) | (10,544 | ) | (6,767 | ) | (17,311 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
$ | (12,579 | ) | $ | 147 | $ | (12,432 | ) | $ | (35,537 | ) | $ | (6,733 | ) | $ | (42,270 | ) | |||||||
Increase in net interest income | $ | 5,937 | $ | 2,647 | $ | 8,584 | $ | 14,290 | $ | 9,756 | $ | 24,046 | ||||||||||||
Net Interest Income Analysis
Net interest income is the amount that interest and fees on earning assets (loans and investments) exceeds the cost of funds, primarily interest paid to the Companys depositors and interest on external borrowings. Net interest margin is the difference between the income on earning assets and the cost of interest-bearing funds as a percentage of average earning assets.
As shown in Tables 2 and 4, net interest income increased $8.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2009. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, as shown in Tables 3 and 4, net interest income was $173.7 million, an increase of $24.0 million, compared to the same period in 2009. These increases were primarily due to: a) repricing or maturing interest-bearing liabilities outpacing interest-earning assets during the period, thereby allowing us to reduce our cost of funds at a faster pace and b) the average balance of interest-earning assets outpacing the growth in interest-bearing liabilities by $68.3 million and c) the shift in the mix of funding sources from higher cost time deposits and borrowings to core interest and non-interest bearing deposits which was a factor in reducing the cost of funds. The net interest margin increased 37 and 39 basis points for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2010, respectively, from the 2009 comparative periods. The net interest margin for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 was 3.08% and 3.02%, respectively.
Comparison of Quarter-to-Date September 2010 and September 2009
Interest and dividend income
decreased $3.8 million to $88.4 million at September 30, 2010 compared to $92.3
million at September 30, 2009 primarily due to lower asset yields. Partially offsetting
this decrease was growth in interest-earning assets with average balances increasing
$198.5 million from the same period a year ago primarily due to the loan portfolio.
The increase in income attributable to the loan portfolio was $244,000, of which $2.6 million was due to net average balance growth, however, it was mostly offset by a decrease of $2.3 million due to lower yields. The increase in interest income attributable to the average balance was primarily in real estate loans and asset based lending, partially offset by continued declines in the purchased residential loan portfolio. The decline in the average yield of 17 basis points was primarily in organic residential mortgage loans as homeowners have been taking advantage of refinancing opportunities at lower rates throughout
41
2009 and 2010. Loan yields have also been negatively impacted by the increase in nonperforming loans of $19.2 million from September 2009.
Earnings on the investment securities portfolio decreased $4.1 million primarily due to the decline in the average yield. The low level of market interest rates has pushed the average yield down 61 basis points causing interest expense to decline $4.3 million.
The cost of funds for the three months ended September 30, 2010 decreased $12.4 million, or 30.7% to $28.1 million, compared to $40.5 million for the same period a year ago. The decrease in the cost of funds was primarily due to a shift to a more favorable funding mix of interest bearing liabilities which resulted in the cost of funds being reduced by 80 basis points.
The Companys continued strategy has been to reduce deposit costs through disciplined pricing while maintaining a focus on the continued growth of core interest and non-interest-bearing deposits. While the average interest-bearing deposit balances increased $157.0 million, deposit costs declined $6.9 million. The Company experienced a decrease of $7.2 million in deposit interest expense due to a reduction of 67 basis points on the average rate paid and was attributable to all deposit categories, especially savings, time and money markets deposits. Deposit interest expense increased $251,000 due to the net increase of the average balance of interest-bearing core deposits of $208.8 million, partially offset by a decrease of $51.8 million in the average time deposit balances. Through our continued emphasis on building core deposit relationships and migration from maturing time deposits as they repriced at reduced rates, the Company has been able to grow core deposit average balances. The main driver of this growth has been money market accounts with an average balance increase of $329.3 million. Additionally, when combined with the decline in the average rate paid of 67 basis points, interest expense decreased by $310,000 for this product.
A further benefit of the low interest rate environment has been the decline in the average rate paid on borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB). FHLB advances and other borrowing costs decreased $5.5 million due to the decline in the average rate paid of 109 basis points. The Company was able to replace maturing advances with new advances at substantially lower rates.
Comparison of Year-to-Date
September 2010 and September 2009
Interest and dividend income decreased
$18.2 million to $262.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared
to $281.1 million at September 30, 2009 and was due to lower yields earned reducing
income by $21.2 million, partially offset by a $3.0 million increase due to the
volume of interest-earning assets. The decline of 37 basis points in the average
yield was primarily due to the decline in loan and investment yields due to lower
market interest rates and, to a lesser extent, the increased level of nonperforming
loans. The increase in organic loans and investment securities helped to relieve
some of the interest rate pressure as the Company, with ready liquidity, was able
to grow these portfolios. Similar to the quarter-to-date discussion, the interest
income decline in the loan portfolio related to the average balance was primarily
due to the decrease in the average balance of the purchased loan portfolio.
The cost of funds for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 decreased $42.3 million
to $89.2 million, compared to $131.4 million for the same period a year ago, primarily
resulting from the Companys diligence in bringing deposit costs down while
continuing to increase core deposit balances. As shown in Table 4, deposit costs
were reduced by $25.1 million due to a decrease in the average rate paid of 86 basis
points, partially offset by an increase of $405,000 due to the increase in the average
balances of $283.4 million. The $24.7 million net decrease in deposit interest costs
has been accomplished in tandem with growth in all core deposits of $514.2 million.
Supported by the growth in deposits, the Company has been able to pay down higher
cost borrowings as they mature or replace them with new advances at substantially
lower rates and reduce its overall reliance on borrowings.
Provision for Loan Losses
The provision for loan losses (provision) is based on managements periodic assessment
of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses (allowance) which,
in turn, is based on such interrelated factors as the composition of the loan portfolio
and its inherent risk characteristics, the level of nonperforming loans and charge-offs,
both current and historic, local economic conditions, the direction of real estate
values, and regulatory guidelines.
Management performs a monthly review of the loan portfolio, and based on this review determines the level of the provision necessary to maintain an adequate allowance for loan losses. Management recorded a provision for loan losses of $4.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010. The primary factors that influenced managements decision to record this provision were increases in nonperforming loans since December 31, 2009 of $17.8 million, or 35.2%, an increase in total delinquencies since December 31, 2009 of $15.2 million, or 20.8%, primarily in residential mortgages, net charge-offs of $4.4 million for the current quarter and to support estimated credit losses embedded in the portfolio. A provision for loan losses of $5.4 million was recorded for the three months ended September 30, 2009 based on the level of delinquencies, net charge-offs and nonperforming loans at that time.
42
For the year to date period ending September 30, 2010, the provision for loan losses was $14.3 million compared to $14.5 million for the same period ended September 30, 2009. Future provisions for loan losses may be deemed necessary if economic conditions do not improve or continue to deteriorate. Further details about nonperforming loans can be found in the Asset Quality and Allowance for Loan Losses sections beginning on page 49.
At September 30, 2010, the allowance for loan losses was $54.6 million, which represented 1.08% of total loans and 79.92% of nonperforming loans. This compared to the allowance for loan losses of $52.5 million at December 31, 2009 which represented 1.10% of total loans and 103.87% of nonperforming loans.
Table 5: Non-Interest Income
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, | Change | September 30, | Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | 2010 | 2009 | Amount | Percent | 2010 | 2009 | Amount | Percent | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depositor service charges | $ | 7,210 | $ | 7,270 | $ | (60 | ) | (1 | ) % | $ | 21,375 | $ | 20,175 | $ | 1,200 | 6 | % | |||||||||||||||
Loan and servicing income | 689 | 322 | 367 | 114 | 1,357 | 498 | 859 | 172 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trust fees | 1,590 | 1,569 | 21 | 1 | 4,764 | 4,219 | 545 | 13 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment management, brokerage & insurance fees | 1,319 | 1,700 | (381 | ) | (22 | ) | 4,135 | 5,514 | (1,379 | ) | (25 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Bank owned life insurance | 822 | 882 | (60 | ) | (7 | ) | 5,131 | 2,652 | 2,479 | 93 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net gain on securities | 421 | 2,029 | (1,608 | ) | (79 | ) | 619 | 5,513 | (4,894 | ) | (89 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage origination activity & loan sale income | 1,150 | 1,268 | (118 | ) | (9 | ) | 2,449 | 4,768 | (2,319 | ) | (49 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net gain (loss) on limited partnerships | 399 | 284 | 115 | 40 | 3,103 | (375 | ) | 3,478 | 927 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Other | 1,018 | 1,125 | (107 | ) | (10 | ) | 2,971 | 3,039 | (68 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total non-interest income |
$ | 14,618 | $ | 16,449 | $ | (1,831 | ) | (11 | ) % | $ | 45,904 | $ | 46,003 | $ | (99 | ) | (0 | )% | ||||||||||||||
Non-Interest Income
Comparison of Quarter-to-Date September 2010 and September 2009
As displayed in Table 5, non-interest income decreased $1.8 million to $14.6
million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 compared to $16.4 million
for the prior year period. The decreases were primarily in investment management,
brokerage and insurance fees and net security gains, partially offset by an increase
in loan and servicing income.
| Investment management, brokerage and insurance fee income decreased due to the low interest rate environment as well as customer preference for deposit products over other investment alternatives. |
||
| Net gain on securities decreased $1.6 million due to higher prior year gains recorded on the sale of mortgage backed securities. The net gain of $421,000 recorded in the third quarter of 2010 was due to the sale of residential mortgage-backed securities and gains recognized on the call of U.S Agency notes and preferred stock. These gains were partially offset by an impairment write-down on an investment in a pooled trust preferred security based on a cash flow analysis. Residential mortgage-backed securities were sold during the current year quarter to reduce pre-payment buy-out risk. Further information related to the impairment can be found in Footnote 4 of the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements. |
||
| Loan and servicing income increased due to commercial real estate loan prepayment fees and an increase in loan fees associated with the commercial finance lending business. |
Comparison of Year-to-Date September
2010 and September 2009
As displayed in Table 5, non-interest income decreased
$99,000 to $45.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 from the prior
year period. The main drivers of the decrease were investment management, brokerage
and insurance fees, net security gains and mortgage origination activity and loan
sale income. These decreases were offset by increases in depositor service charges,
loan and servicing income, trust fees, bank owned life insurance (BOLI)
and net gain on limited partnerships.
| The decreases in net security gains and investment management, brokerage and insurance fees from a year ago are similar to those outlined in the quarterly discussion above. |
||
| Mortgage origination activity and loan sale income decreased due to a lower number of mortgage loans originated for sale and sold in the secondary market and the effect of originations that were in the pipeline under commitments to be sold at September 30, 2010 compared to September 30, 2009. Although the Company has had higher residential mortgage originations of $878.9 million during the year, the majority were originated for portfolio. |
||
| Depositor service charges increased due to overdraft fee income, merchant services income and check card fees. Growth of fee income is attributable to an increase in consumer spending and the growth in retail and business core deposits. The increase in depositor service charges was partially offset by the negative impact of the new federal |
43
banking regulations which restricted overdraft fees. These new rules prohibit financial institutions from charging customers fees for paying overdrafts on automated teller machine and debit card transactions, unless a consumer consents to the overdraft service for those types of transactions. During the quarter, the Company launched a campaign to raise awareness of our customers about the recent regulation change and has received positive customer consents to opt-in, however, depositor service charges may continue to be negatively impacted by this regulation change. |
|||
| Loan and servicing income increased primarily as a result of a prior year write-down of approximately $510,000 on the Banks mortgage servicing asset as well as increased prepayment fees and an increase in fees associated with the commercial finance lending business. |
||
| Trust fees increased due to the overall improvement in market conditions during the period. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, average assets under management were consistently ahead of 2009, and averaged $1.04 billion compared to $917.1 million for the prior year period, a 14% overall increase, evidencing the continued market corrections. |
||
| BOLI income increased as the Company recorded a gain of approximately $2.6 million related to tax-exempt life insurance proceeds. This increase was partially offset by a decline in the average yield earned as a result of current market interest rates and a reduction in the BOLI asset. |
||
| Net gain on limited partnerships increased $3.5 million due primarily to the net increase in the carrying value on certain limited partnerships. Approximately a $2.6 million increase in the carrying value and a realized gain of $529,000 resulted from the initial public offering (IPO) of an underlying portfolio company in a limited partnership. The realized gain represents the Companys allocated income on 25.0% of the shares sold by the partnership in the IPO. The increase in the carrying value was due to the year to date equity method adjustment for the remaining shares. The net increase in 2010 compares to a net loss and an impairment write down recorded in the prior year period. |
Table 6: Non-Interest Expense
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, | Change | September 30, | Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | 2010 | 2009 | Amount | Percent | 2010 | 2009 | Amount | Percent | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Salaries and employee benefits | $ | 25,606 | $ | 22,443 | $ | 3,163 | 14 | % | $ | 71,809 | $ | 65,281 | $ | 6,528 | 10 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Occupancy | 4,480 | 4,287 | 193 | 5 | 13,195 | 13,686 | (491 | ) | (4 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Furniture and fixtures | 1,487 | 1,419 | 68 | 5 | 4,258 | 4,348 | (90 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Outside services | 4,279 | 4,779 | (500 | ) | (10 | ) | 14,146 | 14,584 | (438 | ) | (3 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Advertising, public relations, and sponsorships | 1,779 | 1,869 | (90 | ) | (5 | ) | 4,796 | 3,984 | 812 | 20 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of identifiable intangible assets | 1,953 | 2,122 | (169 | ) | (8 | ) | 5,858 | 6,379 | (521 | ) | (8 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Merger related charges | 4,585 | 4 | 4,581 | 114,525 | 5,089 | 27 | 5,062 | 18,748 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
FDIC insurance premiums | 1,891 | 1,880 | 11 | 1 | 5,646 | 8,717 | (3,071 | ) | (35 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other | 4,186 | 3,439 | 747 | 22 | 11,277 | 10,023 | 1,254 | 13 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total non-interest expense |
$ | 50,246 | $ | 42,242 | $ | 8,004 | 19 | % | $ | 136,074 | $ | 127,029 | $ | 9,045 | 7 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Non-Interest Expense
Comparison of Quarter-to-Date September 2010 and September 2009
As displayed in Table 6, non-interest expense increased $8.0 million to $50.2
million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 from $42.2 million for the
same period a year ago. The main drivers of the increase were salaries and employee
benefits, merger related charges and other expense, partially offset by a decrease
in outside services.
| Salaries and employee benefits increased mainly as a result of a) general merit increases and increased bonus accruals, b) the addition of the commercial finance lending business c) increases in restricted stock and option expense due to additional grant awards, d) increased expense for the Companys pension due to changes in assumptions for 2010 and e) an additional expense in the quarter related to the supplemental executive retirement plan of approximately $1.3 million resulting from the retirement of an executive officer in January 2010. |
||
| Merger related charges increased due primarily to legal and consulting expenses associated with the proposed First Niagara acquisition of the Company and to a lesser extent expenses associated with due diligence efforts for an acquisition that was not completed by the Company. |
||
| Other expense increased in various categories including OREO expense, telephone and supplies as well as an increase in other losses and expense related to a sales and use tax audit. |
||
| Outside services decreased primarily due to prior year consulting costs for a performance optimization project, partially offset by an increase in data processing fees. |
44
Comparison of Year-to-Date September
2010 and September 2009
As displayed in Table 6, non-interest expense increased
$9.0 million to $136.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 from
$127.0 million for the same period a year ago. The main drivers of the increase
were salaries and employee benefits, advertising, public relations, and sponsorships,
merger related charges and other expense. These increases were partially offset
by decreased occupancy expense, outside services, amortization of identifiable intangible
assets and FDIC insurance premiums.
| The increase in salaries and employee benefits, merger related charges and other expenses and the decrease in outside services were primarily due to the same reasons as outlined in the quarterly discussion above. Additionally salaries and employee benefits increased due to a decrease in capitalized salaries due to a decline in the number of residential and commercial loan originations. |
||
| Advertising, public relations and sponsorships increased primarily due to advertising expenses associated with new marketing campaigns. These campaigns include expenses associated with TV commercials, radio, print and online advertising, branch merchandising and collateral pieces, select sponsorships and are expected to continue throughout the remainder of the year. |
||
| FDIC insurance premium expense decreased $3.1 million primarily due to the special assessment of $4.0 million during the second quarter of 2009. The decrease was partially offset by an increase of approximately one basis point in the base assessment rate for 2010, compared to 2009 based on new assessment rates implemented by the FDIC in April 2009. Additionally, the Bank was able to offset some of the first quarter 2009 assessment costs through the exhaustion of the one-time credit established by the FDIC Reform Act of 2005. |
||
| Occupancy expenses declined primarily due to reduced maintenance costs throughout the branch network. |
||
| Amortization of identifiable intangible assets decreased due to less amortization on core deposit intangibles from using the accelerated method of accounting, therefore, there was more amortization expense in 2009 compared to 2010. |
Income Tax Provision
For the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, income tax expense was $6.8 million and
$7.9 million and the effective tax rate for these periods was 32.8% and 38.5%, respectively.
The decrease in the effective tax rate for the three months ended September 30,
2010, as compared to the 2009 period, was primarily due to the reduction of unrecognized
tax benefits and related interest for tax positions of prior years resulting from
the conclusion of the IRS audit in the third quarter of 2010 and the increase in
2009, for the excess remuneration pursuant to Internal Revenue Code 162(m).
For the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, income tax expense was $22.6 million and $19.8 million and the effective tax rate for these periods was 32.7% and 36.6%, respectively. The decrease in the effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, as compared to the 2009 period, was primarily due to an increase in the favorable permanent differences relating to a $2.6 million gain on tax exempt bank owned life insurance proceeds, the decrease in the valuation allowance related to capital loss carryforwards, the reduction of unrecognized tax benefits and related interest for tax positions of prior years resulting from the settlement of the IRS audit in 2010, and the increase in 2009, for the estimate of excess remuneration pursuant to Internal Revenue Code 162(m).
The projected effective rate for the year ended December 31, 2010 is 33.4%.
45
Financial Condition
Financial Condition
Summary
From December 31, 2009 to September 30, 2010, total assets
and total liabilities increased $392.0 million and $353.5 million, respectively,
due mainly to increases in loans, investments, deposits and borrowings. Stockholders equity increased $38.4 million.
Investment Securities
The following table presents the amortized cost and fair value of
investment securities at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
Table 7: Investment Securities
September 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||
Amortized | Fair | Amortized | Fair | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | cost | value | cost | value | ||||||||||||
Available for sale | ||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury obligations |
$ | - | $ | - | $ | 597 | $ | 597 | ||||||||
U.S. Government sponsored enterprise obligations |
445,886 | 454,764 | 198,692 | 199,730 | ||||||||||||
Corporate obligations |
8,108 | 8,872 | 8,139 | 8,517 | ||||||||||||
Other bonds and obligations |
13,496 | 12,358 | 14,625 | 13,234 | ||||||||||||
Auction rate certificates |
- | - | 27,550 | 24,795 | ||||||||||||
Marketable equity securities |
8,089 | 8,121 | 8,567 | 8,783 | ||||||||||||
Trust preferred equity securities |
47,856 | 35,760 | 48,754 | 33,296 | ||||||||||||
Private label residential mortgage-backed securities |
20,459 | 19,379 | 23,871 | 20,856 | ||||||||||||
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
1,720,767 | 1,796,108 | 1,951,297 | 2,018,047 | ||||||||||||
Total available for sale |
2,264,661 | 2,335,362 | 2,282,092 | 2,327,855 | ||||||||||||
Held to maturity | ||||||||||||||||
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
288,785 | 300,374 | 230,596 | 241,956 | ||||||||||||
Other bonds |
9,710 | 10,072 | 10,170 | 10,375 | ||||||||||||
Total held to maturity |
298,495 | 310,446 | 240,766 | 252,331 | ||||||||||||
Total securities |
$ | 2,563,156 | $ | 2,645,808 | $ | 2,522,858 | $ | 2,580,186 | ||||||||
At September 30, 2010, the Company had total investments of $2.63 billion, or 29.8% of total assets. The increase of $65.2 million, from $2.57 billion at December 31, 2009 was primarily in U.S Government agency obligations and held to maturity residential mortgage-backed securities partially offset by a decrease in available-for-sale residential mortgage-backed securities. While the Company prefers lending as the primary use of its excess cash flows, the investment portfolio serves a secondary role in generating revenue while managing interest-rate risk and liquidity.
The available for sale and held to maturity securities portfolios are primarily composed of mortgage-backed securities. At September 30, 2010, mortgage-backed securities comprised 77.7% and 96.7% of the total available for sale and held to maturity securities portfolios, respectively, the majority of which are issued by Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA) or (Fannie Mae) and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC) or (Freddie Mac). The duration of the mortgage-backed securities portfolio was 1.46 years at September 30, 2010 compared to 1.62 years at December 31, 2009.
The Companys underlying investment strategy has been to purchase FNMA and FHLMC short-term sequential collateralized mortgage obligations and seasoned 15 and 20 year Government Sponsored Enterprise (GSE) fixed rate mortgage-backed securities. The Company has focused on the purchases of these securities due to their attractive spreads versus funding costs and for their monthly cash flows that provide the Company with liquidity. This strategy is also supplemented with select purchases of bullet, callable and step-up coupon agency debentures. The average life for mortgage-backed securities, when purchased, would range between two and four years and the maturity dates for Agency obligations would range between one and seven years depending upon the rate structure of the bond.
FASB guidance for the accounting of Investments - Debt and Equity Securities, requires the Company to designate its securities as held to maturity, available for sale or trading depending on the Companys intent regarding its investments at the time of purchase. The Company does not currently maintain a portfolio of trading securities. As of September 30, 2010, $2.34 billion, or 88.7% of the portfolio, was classified as available for sale and $298.5 million of the portfolio was classified as held to maturity. Securities available for sale are carried at estimated fair value. Additional information about fair value measurements can be found in Note 14 of the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.
46
During the three months ended September 30, 2010 and June 30, 2010, a pooled trust preferred security, which had a previous credit related impairment charge during 2009, was deemed to have additional credit related OTTI loss in the amount of $378,000 and $552,000, respectively. These credit related impairments were based on further declines in expected cash flows and were reclassified from other comprehensive income as they were previously recognized as non-credit related. Management utilizes nine cash flow scenarios received from the underwriter to analyze this security for potential OTTI. The nine scenarios cover various default rates, recovery rates and prepayment options over different time periods. Two of the nine cash flow analyses continue to indicate impairment over the life of the security, the driver of which is the recovery rate, modeled at 0%. Past history of the security indicates that there have not been any recoveries to date from securities that have defaulted. Based on these factors, management recorded a credit related impairment of $378,000 in the third quarter. The credit impairments represent the average loss of the two negative cash flow analyses at each period. After the write-down, the pooled trust preferred security had an amortized cost and fair value of approximately $497,000 and $221,000, respectively. There is no intent to sell nor is it more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell this security.
The net unrealized gain on securities classified as available for sale as of September 30, 2010 was $70.7 million compared to an unrealized gain of $45.8 million as of December 31, 2009. All investment categories except marketable equity securities experienced positive movement in the mark to market since December 31, 2009. The appreciation in the market value of securities available for sale was primarily due to the increase in the fair value of mortgage-backed securities due to the decrease in intermediate LIBOR/Swap rates and the slight tightening in mortgage spreads. Mortgage spreads tightened due to increased bank demand for mortgages due to the continued low interest rate environment. Additionally, the auction rate certificates were tendered at par and the trust preferred equity securities have experienced improvement in market value. The changes in unrealized gains and losses on the investment portfolio were also due to credit spreads, liquidity and fluctuations in market interest rates during the period.
The net unrealized gain on residential mortgage-backed securities is primarily from agency mortgage-backed securities issued by FNMA and FHLMC resulting from the general decline in interest rates and the tightening in mortgage-backed security spreads since date of purchase. Although the Federal Reserve Bank mortgage-backed securities purchase program ended on March 31, 2010, mortgage rates and spreads continue to remain at relatively low levels.
The unrealized loss on private label residential mortgage-backed securities is primarily concentrated in one BBB rated private-label mortgage-backed security which is substantially paid down, well seasoned and of an earlier vintage that has not been significantly affected by high delinquency levels or vulnerable to lower collateral coverage as seen in later issued pools. Widening in non-agency mortgage spreads since the date purchased is the primary factor for the unrealized losses reported on private label residential mortgage-backed securities. None of the securities are backed by subprime mortgage loans and none have suffered losses. Other than the BBB rated security, there is one security rated AA and the remaining securities are AAA rated. Managements review concluded that the private-label mortgage-backed securities are not other-than-temporarily impaired.
The unrealized losses on other bonds and obligations primarily relates to a position in an adjustable rate mortgage mutual fund. During 2009, the Company recorded an OTTI loss of $816,000 on this adjustable rate mortgage mutual fund due to a decrease in the credit quality of the security coupled with a loss recognized by the fund. As of September 30, 2010, the investment carries a market value to book value ratio of 83.32%, a weighted average underlying investment credit rating of AAA and it continues to pay normal monthly dividends. There is no intent to sell nor is it more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell these securities and management has therefore concluded that the fund experienced no further OTTI in the nine months ended September 30, 2010.
Trust preferred securities are comprised of two pooled trust preferreds with an amortized cost of $5.2 million, one of which is rated BB and the other is rated CC at September 30, 2010. During 2009, the Company recorded a credit related impairment of $581,000 on the CC rated pooled trust preferred security based on a cash flow analysis and subsequent credit related impairments of $930,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 as discussed above. The remaining $42.7 million of trust preferred securities are comprised of twelve individual names issues with the following ratings: $15.6 million rated A to A-, $25.6 million rated BBB- to BBB and $1.5 million rated BB. The unrealized losses reported for trust preferred securities relate to the financial and liquidity stresses in the fixed income markets and in the banking sector and are not reflective of individual stresses in the individual company names. The ratings on all of the issues with the exception of the CC rated pooled security have improved or remained the same since December 31, 2009. Additionally, there have not been any disruptions in the cash flows of these securities and all are currently paying the contractual principal and interest payments. A detailed review of the two pooled trust preferreds and the individual names trust preferred equity securities was completed by management. This review included an analysis of collateral reports, cash flows, stress default levels and financial ratios of the underlying issuers. Management concluded that after the OTTI loss recorded on the CC rated pooled trust preferred security, these securities are not other-than-temporarily impaired.
47
The Company has no intent to sell nor is it more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell any of these securities within the time necessary to recover the unrealized losses, which may be until maturity. The Company does not own or plan on investing in securities backed by subprime mortgage collateral.
Lending Activities
The Company makes
residential real estate loans secured by one-to-four family residences, commercial
real estate loans, residential and commercial construction loans, commercial business
loans, home equity loans and lines of credit and other consumer loans. Table 8 displays
the balances of the Companys loan portfolio as of September 30, 2010 and December
31, 2009.
Table 8: Loan Portfolio
September 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||
Percent | Percent | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | Amount | of Total | of Total | |||||||||||
Residential real estate | $ | 2,521,200 | 49.7 | % | $ | 2,382,514 | 50.0 | % | ||||||
Residential real estate construction | 17,359 | 0.3 | 13,789 | 0.3 | ||||||||||
Total residential real estate |
2,538,559 | 50.0 | 2,396,303 | 50.3 | ||||||||||
Commercial real estate | 1,225,179 | 24.2 | 1,100,880 | 23.1 | ||||||||||
Commercial real estate construction | 94,144 | 1.9 | 132,370 | 2.8 | ||||||||||
Total commercial real estate |
1,319,323 | 26.1 | 1,233,250 | 25.9 | ||||||||||
Commercial business | 513,931 | 10.1 | 411,211 | 8.6 | ||||||||||
Home equity and equity lines of credit | 684,007 | 13.5 | 705,673 | 14.9 | ||||||||||
Other consumer | 12,862 | 0.3 | 15,608 | 0.3 | ||||||||||
Total loans |
$ | 5,068,682 | 100.0 | % | $ | 4,762,045 | 100.0 | % | ||||||
As shown in Table 8, gross loans were $5.07 billion, up $306.6 million, at September 30, 2010 from December 31, 2009. The Company experienced increases in residential real estate, commercial real estate and business loans partially offset by a decline in home equity and other consumer loans.
Residential real estate loans continue to represent the largest segment of the Companys loan portfolio as of September 30, 2010, comprising 50.0% of total loans. The increase of $142.3 million from December 31, 2009 was primarily due to origination volume partially offset by the net impact of prepayments. The Company had significant originations of both adjustable and fixed rate mortgages of $878.9 million during the first nine months of the year, with approximately $661.0 million originated for portfolio and the remainder was sold in the secondary market. The Company currently sells the majority of all originated fixed rate residential real estate loans with terms of 15 years or more. During the third quarter of 2009 the Company began to retain in its portfolio 30 year jumbo fixed rate residential mortgage originations and in 2010 the Company originated and retained $93.8 million of these mortgages. The strong mortgage origination activity resulted from low market interest rates, competitive pricing and increased marketing campaigns. The residential real estate loan portfolio has a weighted average FICO score of 748 and a current estimated weighted loan to value ratio of 62%. Included in residential real estate is a purchased portfolio, which is made up of prime loans individually re-underwritten by the Company to our underwriting criteria, and includes adjustable-rate and 10 and 15 year fixed-rate residential real estate loans with property locations throughout the United States with no significant exposure in any particular state. At September 30, 2010 the Companys purchased portfolio had an outstanding balance of approximately $395.3 million with the largest concentration in our footprint of Connecticut and Massachusetts at 19.1%, followed by New York at 13.9% and California at 12.1%.
Commercial real estate loans increased $86.1 million from December 31, 2009, as the Bank has experienced increased demand in refinancing commercial real estate loans. Mid-sized businesses continue to look to regional community banks for relationship banking and personalized lending services. The commercial construction portfolio of $94.1 million includes $22.6 million of loans to commercial borrowers for residential housing development, of which approximately $8.2 million are for condominium projects. The decrease in commercial construction is mainly the result of transfers of construction to permanent loans to the commercial real estate portfolio as well as a drop in residential housing development loans.
The Company originates loans with interest reserves on certain commercial construction credits depending on various factors including, but not
limited to, quality of credit, interest rate and project type. At September 30, 2010 the Company has four performing commercial construction loans representing approximately 2.0% of the total commercial real estate portfolio balance with outstanding interest
reserves of approximately $4.8 million.
The Companys long term strategy continues to be that
of building a larger percentage of the Companys assets in commercial loans
including real estate and other business loans, such as asset based lending. In
the fourth quarter of 2009, the Company formed an asset based lending business.
Asset based lending expands the Banks business lending offerings to include
revolving lines of credit and term loans secured by accounts receivable, inventory,
and other assets. An asset based loan is collateralized with a customers balance
sheet assets, which are considered the primary source of loan repayment. This type
of financing is 48 particularly attractive to start-up and
growth companies, as well as those in restructuring, turn-around, or other financially
distressed situations that result in the inability to secure traditional commercial
lending. Commercial business loans increased $102.7 million from December 31,
2009, primarily due to asset based lending. As of September 30, 2010, the asset
based lending portfolio was $115.1 million or 2.3% of total loans. The Company remains
an active commercial lender and will continue promoting strong business development
efforts to obtain new business banking relationships, while maintaining strong credit
quality and profitability. We believe that our status as a healthy regional community
bank focused on relationship banking bodes well for us to retain customers and to
be a potential source of credit for new businesses. Home equity loans and lines
of credit decreased $21.7 million from December 31, 2009 to September 30, 2010.
The Company continues to offer competitive pricing and is committed to growing this
loan segment while maintaining credit quality. However, as a result of the continuing
interest rate environment, consumer demand has shifted to residential mortgages
and away from home equity products, attributing to the year-to-date decline in the
portfolio. The weighted average FICO score and current estimated weighted combined
loan to value ratio for home equity loans and lines of credit is 749 and 66%, respectively.
Lending has been from organic originations in the Companys market area, none
of which is subprime. Higher-Risk Loans Within the residential
portfolio, management uses an early warning technique to more closely monitor credit
deterioration and potential nonperforming loans. The Company uses a matrix to identify
where the concentration of outstanding loans fall in the risk continuum. This matrix
is constructed using estimated current loan-to-value ranges (current balance LTV
adjusted for estimated appreciation or depreciation in the appraised value) and
the latest available FICO score ranges (rescored quarterly). The Company considers
loans with an estimated current loan-to-value ratio above 80% and a FICO score less
than 620 to be higher-risk. Once identified, the higher-risk loans are then reviewed
by the Special Assets department to determine what, if any, action should be taken
to mitigate possible loss exposure. At September 30, 2010, higher-risk loans comprised
approximately $49.3 million, or 2.5% of the residential real estate portfolio. Additionally, the Company also tracks loans that have a FICO score that has declined
20 points or more and are below 660. As of September 30, 2010 loans meeting this
criteria represent approximately $47.2 million, or 1.9% of the residential portfolio.
Asset Quality As displayed in Table 9, nonperforming
assets at September 30, 2010 increased to $71.4 million compared to $54.2 million
at December 31, 2009. The increase is primarily due to loans secured by residential
one-to-four family loans and commercial real estate loans. The increase in nonperforming
residential loans of $18.0 million was due to current economic conditions including
factors such as continued high unemployment rates and softness in the real estate
market impacting customers ability to make loan payments. There are 215 loans in
the residential nonperforming category totaling $49.1 million, representing 1.94%
of the total residential portfolio, just over half of which have property locations
in Connecticut and Massachusetts. The Company routinely updates FICO scores and
LTV ratios and continues to originate loans with superior credit characteristics.
Through continued heightened account monitoring, collections and workout efforts,
the Bank is committed to mortgage solution programs to assist homeowners to remain
in their homes. As has been its practice historically, the Company does not originate
subprime loans. Included in nonperforming residential loans are approximately $4.9
million in restructured loans which have been modified from their original contractual
terms. The increase in nonperforming commercial real estate loans primarily relates
to one loan totaling $3.7 million which has been restructured, partially offset
by a decrease of $1.7 million due to a note sale. In the course of resolving nonperforming
loans, the Bank may choose to restructure the contractual terms of certain real
estate loans. Terms may be modified to fit the ability of the borrower to repay
in line with their current financial status which may be a reduction in interest
rate to market rate or below, a change in the term, movement of the past due amounts
to the back end of the loan or refinance. Loans are placed on nonaccrual 49 status upon being restructured, even if
they were not previously. The Banks policy to restore a restructured loan
to performing status is dependent on the receipt of regular payments, generally
for a period of six months. While the economic data indicates the worst of the
recession is over, if unfavorable economic and real estate market conditions persist
or deteriorate further, there will be added stress on our loan portfolios. The Company
believes, however, that its historical practice of prudent underwriting, the relatively
modest size of its residential construction portfolio and strong average FICO scores
combined with low weighted average loan to value ratios associated with its residential
portfolio are significant advantages in keeping asset quality manageable. Nonperforming
loans as a percent of total loans outstanding at September 30, 2010 were 1.35%,
compared to 1.06% at December 31, 2009. Table 9: Nonperforming Assets Real
estate loans Residential
(one- to four- family) Commercial
real estate loans Commercial
construction Total
real estate loans Commercial
business Consumer
loans Home
equity and equity lines of credit Other
consumer Total
consumer loans Total
nonperforming loans Total
nonperforming assets Total
nonperforming loans as a percentage of total loans (2) Total
nonperforming assets as a percentage of total assets Troubled
debt restructured loans included in nonaccruing loans above Nonperforming
loans, except guaranteed U.S. Government certificates totaling $1,000 and $477,000
at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, include all loans 90
days or more past due, restructured loans due to a weakening in the financial condition
of the borrower and other loans which have been identified by the Company as presenting
uncertainty with respect to the collectability of principal or interest. All of
the Companys non-performing loans do not accrue interest. Total loans
are stated at their principal amounts outstanding, net of deferred loan fees and
net unamortized premiums on acquired loans. Allowance for Loan Losses The Company has a loan loss allowance of $54.6 million, or 1.08%
of total loans as compared to a loan loss allowance of $52.5 million, or 1.10% of
total loans at December 31, 2009. Management believes that the allowance for loan
losses is adequate and consistent with asset quality indicators and that it represents
the best estimate of probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio. To achieve
this estimate, numerous factors are evaluated and applied to the allowance for loan
loss calculation. The allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans ratio
at September 30, 2010 was 79.92% compared to 103.87% at December 31, 2009 and 105.36%
at September 30, 2009. This ratio has declined because growth in the allowance is
not proportionate to growth in nonperforming loans as the result of the following:
1) the majority of the Companys nonperforming 50 loans are secured by real estate collateral
and while the entire loan is classified as nonperforming, only the amount of estimated
losses would have been captured in the allowance for loan losses; 2) growth in nonperforming
loans has been concentrated in residential real estate loans in which a significant
loss in event of default is relatively low; 3) certain nonperforming loans have
already been partially charged-off to the expected net realizable value; and 4)
a portion of the allowance is to cover losses established under FASB ASC 450,
Contingencies, for performing loans. The increase in total loans since December
31, 2009 has been concentrated in well secured residential mortgage and asset based
loans. Additionally, there has been a continued reduction in the construction loan
portfolio. The increase in residential real estate nonperforming loans has been
the main driver of the overall increase in total nonperforming loans. Nonperforming
loans increased $17.8 million, or 35.2%, since December 31, 2009, of which $18.0
million, or 101.2%, was in residential real estate loans. The residential portfolio
presents a low risk of significant loss due to the Companys conservative underwriting
standards and low LTV ratios. Additionally, the Company has analyzed the majority
of its nonperforming loans for specific reserves and its on-going reappraisal process
continued to support high collateral levels and coverage. Although increased
from December 2009, total nonperforming loans remained at the same level as in the
prior quarter, while total delinquencies and criticized loans have only had slight
increases and adversely classified loans have decreased. The Company employs
a formal quarterly process to assess the adequacy of the Companys allowance
for loan losses. The process is designed to adequately capture inherent losses in
the loan portfolio. The Company continues to aggressively address and dispose of
impaired and adversely classified assets particularly as it relates to loans with
a potentially higher risk of loss. Net charge-offs and overall loan portfolio performance
continues to remain well within expected ranges. Table 10: Schedule of Allowance
for Loan Losses Residential real estate loans Commercial real estate loans Commercial construction loans Commercial business loans Consumer loans Total charge-offs Residential real estate loans Commercial real estate loans Commercial
construction loans Commercial
business loans Consumer loans Total recoveries Loans Held for Sale
Goodwill and Identifiable Intangible Assets 51 Identifiable
intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line or accelerated basis, over their
estimated lives. Management assesses the recoverability of intangible assets subject
to amortization whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their
carrying value may not be recoverable. If the carrying amount exceeds fair value,
an impairment charge is recorded to income. Goodwill is
not amortized, but instead is reviewed for impairment on an annual basis and more
frequently if circumstances exist that indicate a possible reduction in the fair
value of the business below its carrying value. For purposes of goodwill impairment
evaluation, the Bank is identified as the reporting unit. The Company engaged an
external third party to assist with the annual test for goodwill impairment during
the first quarter of 2010. The analysis performed evaluated the fair value of the
reporting unit using a combination of four valuation methodologies including; the
Public Market Peers approach, the Comparable Transactions approach, the Control
Premium approach and a Discounted Cash Flow approach. Based on the analysis, the
Company concluded that the reporting unit was not at risk of failing Step 1 of the
impairment test; therefore, an impairment charge was not deemed necessary. No events
or circumstances subsequent to the analysis through September 30, 2010 indicate
that the carrying value of the Companys goodwill may not be recoverable. Cash flows
from deposits, loan and mortgage-backed securities repayments, securities sales
proceeds and maturities, borrowings and earnings are the primary sources of the
Companys funds available for use in its lending and investment activities
and in meeting its operational needs. While scheduled loan and securities repayments
are a relatively stable source of funds, deposit flows and loan and investment security
prepayments are influenced by prevailing interest rates and local and economic conditions
and are inherently uncertain. See Note 9 of Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements contained elsewhere within this Report for borrowings information. The Company
attempts to control the flow of funds in its deposit accounts according to its need
for funds and the cost of alternative sources of funding. A Loan and Deposit Pricing
Committee meets weekly to determine pricing and marketing initiatives. It influences
the flow of funds primarily by the pricing of deposits, which is affected to a large
extent by competitive factors in its market area and asset/liability management
strategies. The Company
receives retail and commercial deposits through its main office and 87 additional
banking offices throughout Connecticut (76 locations) and Massachusetts (12 locations).
Customers can also access their accounts through ATMs, internet banking and telephone
banking. Customer deposits generated through the NewAlliance banking network are
the largest source of funds used to support asset growth. Total
deposits As displayed
in Table 11, deposits increased $114.8 million compared to December 31, 2009. The
Companys strategy has been to increase core deposits and reduce rates paid
on interest bearing deposits, particularly on time deposits, in order to improve
the net interest margin and the interest rate spread while continuing to build core
relationships. Through well-designed product offerings, the Company has been able
to grow core deposits by $136.5 million, particularly through the Companys
money market products which have grown $203.1 million since year end. The Company
has executed several marketing programs, including telephone and direct mail campaigns
to retain valued, higher-balance deposit accounts through the cross-sell strategy
of offering our highest tier of banking products Premium and Platinum Checking
and their companion accounts Premium and Platinum Savings and Premium and
Platinum Money Market. Also, and keeping in line with the Companys overall
deposit strategy throughout the year, the Company has reduced its cost of interest
bearing deposits, which has led to decreases in savings and time deposits of $112.0
million and $21.7 million, respectively. However, the Company was able to retain
a portion of these deposit accounts through our premium level money market products
that offer competitive interest rates. 52 NewAlliance
also uses various types of short-term and long-term borrowings in meeting funding
needs. While customer deposits remain the primary source for funding loan originations,
management uses short-term and long-term borrowings as a supplementary funding source
for loan growth and other liquidity needs when the cost of these funds are favorable
compared to alternative funding, including deposits. The Company
is a member of the FHLB of Boston which is part of the Federal Home Loan Bank System.
Members are required to own capital stock in the FHLB and borrowings are collateralized
by certain home mortgages or securities of the U.S. Government and its agencies. Total
borrowings Borrowings
were $2.12 billion at September 30, 2010, an increase of $232.7 million from the balance
recorded at December 31, 2009, and were mainly in FHLB advances. This increase represents
the Company taking advantage of reduced rates offered by the FHLB for advances that
were competitive with current market deposit rates. Combined with the growth in
our core deposits, the advances assist the Company with the growth in our loan portfolio,
to invest in securities and meet other liquidity needs, while effectively managing
interest rate risk. At September 30, 2010, all of the Companys outstanding
FHLB advances were at fixed rates ranging from 0.34% to 8.17%. Total stockholders equity equaled $1.47 billion at September 30, 2010, an increase of $38.4 million
compared to $1.43 billion at December 31, 2009. The increase was primarily due to
earnings of $46.6 million and the increase in the fair market value of available-for-sale
investment securities of $16.1 million, net of tax. The increase in equity was partially
offset by the acquisition of treasury stock totaling $11.3 million and $20.9 million
for the payment of cash dividends declared on our common stock during the nine months
ended September 30, 2010. For information regarding our compliance with applicable
capital requirements, see Liquidity and Capital Position below. Dividends
declared during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 were $0.21 per
share. On October 26, 2010, we declared a $0.07 per share cash dividend payable on
November 16, 2010 to shareholders of record on November 5, 2010. This will be the
Companys 26th consecutive quarterly dividend payment. Book value per share
amounted to $14.02 and $13.53 at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively,
and tangible book value amounted to $8.72 and $8.23 at the same dates, respectively. 53 Market risk
is the exposure to losses resulting from changes in interest rates, foreign currency
exchange rates, commodity prices and equity prices. The Company has no foreign currency
or commodity price risk. Credit risk related to investment securities is mitigated
as the majority are government agency securities. There is no direct subprime mortgage
exposure in the investment portfolio. The chief market risk factor affecting financial
condition and operating results is interest rate risk. Interest rate risk is the
exposure of current and future earnings and capital arising from adverse movements
in interest rates and spreads. This risk is managed by periodic evaluation of the
interest rate risk inherent in certain balance sheet accounts, determination of
the level of risk considered appropriate given the Companys capital and liquidity
requirements, business strategy, performance objectives and operating environment
and maintenance of such risks within guidelines approved by the Board of Directors.
Through such management, the Company seeks to reduce the vulnerability of its net
earnings to changes in interest rates. The Asset/Liability Committee, comprised
of numerous senior executives, is responsible for managing interest rate risk. On
a quarterly basis, the Board of Directors reviews the Companys gap position
and interest rate sensitivity exposure described below and Asset/Liability Committee
minutes detailing the Companys activities and strategies, the effect of those
strategies on the Companys operating results, interest rate risk position
and the effect changes in interest rates would have on the Companys net interest
income. The extent of movement of interest rates is an uncertainty that could have
a negative impact on earnings. The principal
strategies used to manage interest rate risk include (i) emphasizing the origination,
purchase and retention of adjustable rate loans, and the origination and purchase
of loans with maturities matched with those of the deposits and borrowings funding
the loans, (ii) investing in debt securities with relatively short maturities and/or
average lives and (iii) classifying a significant portion of its investment portfolio
as available for sale so as to provide sufficient flexibility in liquidity management.
By its strategy of limiting the Banks risk to rising interest rates, the Bank
is also limiting the benefit of falling interest rates. The Company
employs two approaches to interest rate risk measurement; gap analysis and income
simulation analysis. The matching
of assets and liabilities may be analyzed by examining the extent to which such
assets and liabilities are interest rate sensitive and by monitoring
a banks interest rate sensitivity gap. An asset or liability is
deemed to be interest rate sensitive within a specific time period if it will mature
or reprice within that time period. The interest rate sensitivity gap
is defined as the difference between the amount of interest-earning assets maturing
or repricing within a specific time period and the amount of interest-bearing liabilities
maturing or repricing within that same time period. At September 30, 2010, the Companys cumulative one-year interest rate gap (which is the difference between the
amount of interest-earning assets maturing or repricing within one year and interest-bearing
liabilities maturing or repricing within one year), was positive $562.9 million,
or 6.38% of total assets. The Banks approved policy limit is plus or minus
20%. A gap is considered positive when the amount of interest rate sensitive assets
exceeds the amount of interest rate sensitive liabilities. A gap is considered negative
when the amount of interest rate sensitive liabilities exceeds the amount of interest
rate sensitive assets. During a period of rising interest rates, a negative gap
would tend to adversely affect net interest income while a positive gap would tend
to result in an increase in net interest income. Conversely, during a period of
falling interest rates, a negative gap would tend to result in an increase in net
interest income while a positive gap would tend to adversely affect net interest
income. Income simulation
analysis considers the maturity and repricing characteristics of assets and liabilities,
as well as the relative sensitivities of these balance sheet components over a range
of interest rate scenarios. Tested scenarios include instantaneous rate shocks,
rate ramps over a six-month or one-year period, static rates, non-parallel shifts
in the yield curve and a forward rate scenario. The simulation analysis is used
to measure the exposure of net interest income to changes in interest rates over
a specified time horizon, usually a three-year period. Simulation analysis involves
projecting a future balance sheet structure and interest income and expense under
the various rate scenarios. The Companys internal guidelines on interest rate
risk specify that for a range of interest rate scenarios, the estimated net interest
margin over the next 12 months should decline by less than 12% as compared to the
forecasted net interest margin in the base case scenario. However, in practice,
interest rate risk is managed well within these 12% guidelines. For the base
case rate scenario the yield curve as of September 30, 2010 was utilized. This yield
curve was utilized due to the recent excessive volatility in the rate markets as
well as due to the comments from various Federal Reserve Bank (FRB)
officials that interest rates would likely remain flat for an extended period. As
of September 30, 2010, the Companys estimated exposure as a percentage of
estimated net interest income for the next twelve-month period as compared to the
forecasted net interest income in the base case scenario are as follows: 54 As of September
30, 2010, a downward rate shock of 25 basis points was a realistic representation
of the risk of falling rates as the FRB has reduced the overnight lending rate target
to a range between 0.00% and 0.25%. For an increase in rates, an upward rate shock
of 100 basis points is also a relevant representation of potential risk given the
recent beginnings of an economic rebound both here in the U.S. as well as overseas
and the expansion of the FRBs balance sheet. Based on the
scenarios above, net interest income would increase slightly in the 12-month period
after an upward movement in rates, and would decrease slightly after a downward
movement in rates. Computation of prospective effects of hypothetical interest rate
changes are based on a number of assumptions including the level of market interest
rates, the degree to which non-maturity deposits react to changes in market rates,
the expected prepayment rates on loans and investments, the degree to which early
withdrawals occur on time deposits and other deposit flows. As a result, these computations
should not be relied upon as indicative of actual results. Further, the computations
do not reflect any actions that management may undertake in response to changes
in interest rates. Liquidity
is the ability to meet current and future short-term financial obligations. The
Company further defines liquidity as the ability to respond to the needs of depositors
and borrowers as well as maintaining the flexibility to take advantage of investment
opportunities. The Companys primary sources of funds consist of deposit inflows,
loan repayments and sales, maturities, paydowns and sales of investment and mortgage-backed
securities, borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank and repurchase agreements. The Companys most liquid assets are cash and due from banks, short-term investments and
debt securities. The levels of these assets are dependent on the Companys
operating, financing, lending and investment activities during any given period.
At September 30, 2010, cash and due from banks, short-term investments and debt
securities maturing within one year amounted to $437.7 million, or 4.84% of total
assets. The Company
manages liquidity by determining its cash position daily. The Investment Department
compiles reports detailing the Companys cash activity and cash balances occurring
at its various correspondents and through its various funding sources. The Investment
Department then settles all correspondent and bank accounts by either investing
excess funds or borrowing to cover the projected shortfall. Factors affecting
liquidity include loan origination volumes, loan prepayment rates, maturity structure
of existing loans, core deposit growth levels, time deposit maturity structure and
retention, investment portfolio cash flows, the market value of investment securities
that can be used to collateralize FHLB advances and repurchase agreements. The liquidity
position is influenced by general interest rate levels, economic conditions and
competition. For example, as interest rates decline, payments of principal from
the loan and mortgage-backed securities portfolio accelerate, as borrowers are more
willing to prepay. Additionally, the market value of the securities portfolio generally
increases as rates decline, thereby increasing the amount of collateral available
for funding purposes. The Company
has used borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston to fund loan growth
while managing interest rate risk and liquidity. At September 30, 2010, total borrowings
from the Federal Home Loan Bank amounted to $1.99 billion, exclusive of $2.1 million
in purchase accounting adjustments, and the Company had the immediate capacity to
increase that total to $2.23 billion. Additional borrowing capacity of approximately $1.51
billion would be readily available by pledging eligible investment securities as
collateral. Depending on market conditions and the Companys liquidity and
gap position, the Company may continue to borrow from the Federal Home Loan Bank
or initiate borrowings through the repurchase agreement market. At September 30,
2010 the Companys repurchase agreement lines of credit with four large broker
dealers totaled $200.0 million, $175.0 million of which was available on that date.
Agreement terms vary based on the collateral submitted. NewAlliances main source of liquidity at the parent company level is dividends from NewAlliance
Bank. The main uses of liquidity are payments of dividends to common stockholders,
repurchase of NewAlliances common stock, the payment of principal and interest
to holders of trust preferred securities, and help fund acquisitions. There are
certain restrictions on the payment of dividends. See Note 16 of Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements contained elsewhere within this report for further information
on dividend restrictions. 55 56 Since the
first action was commenced, nine additional lawsuits have been filed against NewAlliance,
First Niagara, Merger Sub, and/or the NewAlliance directors and certain officers
of NewAlliance. The plaintiffs in the additional lawsuits are: Southwest Ohio Regional
Council of Carpenters Pension Plan (NNH-CV10-6014110); Cynthia J. Kops (NNH-CV10-6014155);
Joseph Caldarella (NNH-CV10-6014192); Michael Rubin (NNH-CV10-6014328); Arlene H.
Levine and Gertrude M. Nitkin (NNH-CV10-6014477); Port Authority of Alleghany County
Retirement & Disability Allowance Plan for Employees Represented by Local 85
of the Amalgamated Transit Union (NN-CV10-6014634); Alan Kahn (Case No. 5785); Moses
Eilenberg (Case No. 5796); and Erie County Employees Retirement System (Case
No. 5831). The latter three lawsuits were filed in the Court of Chancery of the
State of Delaware and the remainder were filed in the Connecticut Superior Court.
The claims in the nine additional lawsuits are substantially the same as the claims
in the first lawsuit and seek, among other things, to enjoin the proposed merger
on the agreed upon terms. Certain of the new actions, however, also seek attorneys and experts fees and actual and punitive damages if the merger is completed. On September
28, 2010, the three Delaware actions were consolidated into In re NewAlliance Bancshares,
Inc. Shareholders Litigation (No. 5785-VCP), and the plaintiffs in the consolidated
action filed an amended complaint which adds allegations challenging the accuracy
of disclosures in the preliminary Form S-4, a motion to preliminarily enjoin the
defendants from taking any action to consummate the merger and a motion seeking
expedited discovery. On October 22, the court granted the plaintiffs motion
for expedited discovery and tentatively scheduled a preliminary injunction hearing
for December 1, 2010. On October
19, 2010, the seven Connecticut actions were transferred to the complex litigation
docket in the Judicial District of Stamford. The cases were consolidated on October
20 and, on October 22, the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint which adds allegations
challenging the accuracy of disclosure in the preliminary Form S-4. The plaintiffs
in the Connecticut actions also have indicated that they intend to seek a preliminary
injunction and expedited discovery. On October
18 and 19, 2010, the defendants filed motions in the seven Connecticut actions and
in the consolidated Delaware action requesting that the courts direct the plaintiffs
in all the actions to confer and agree on a single forum in which to litigate their
claims, or if the plaintiffs are unable to agree, that the courts confer and designate
a single forum, and that the cases in the other forum be stayed. The defendants motions are pending. In addition
to the risk factors described in the Companys Annual report on Form 10K for
the year ended December 31, 2009, management believes the following risks and uncertainties
could materially affect the Company. The Merger
Agreement May Be Terminated in Accordance with Its Terms and the Merger May Not
Be Completed. In addition,
certain circumstances exist whereby NewAlliance may choose to terminate the merger
agreement, including if First Niagaras share price declines to below $10.22
(subject to customary anti-dilution adjustments) as of the first date when all regulatory
approvals for the merger have been received, combined with such decline being at
least 20% greater than a corresponding decline in the value of the NASDAQ Bank Index. If this situation occurs,
the agreement allows First Niagara the ability to make an adjustment to the exchange ratio, pursuant to a specified
formula, to cure any shortfall caused by the decline in share price as previously described.
There can be no assurance that the conditions to closing of the
merger will be fulfilled or that the merger will be completed. Termination
of the Merger Agreement Could Negatively Impact NewAlliance. NewAlliances businesses may have been adversely impacted by the failure to pursue other
beneficial opportunities due to the focus of management on the merger, without realizing
any of the anticipated benefits of completing the merger; and the market
price of NewAlliance common stock might decline to the extent that the current market
price reflects a market assumption that the merger will be completed. 57 If the merger
agreement is terminated and NewAlliances board of directors seeks another
merger or business combination, NewAlliance stockholders cannot be certain that
NewAlliance will be able to find a party willing to offer equivalent or more attractive
consideration than the consideration First Niagara has agreed to provide in the
merger. NewAlliance
Will Be Subject to Business Uncertainties and Contractual Restrictions While the
Merger is Pending. The Merger Agreement Limits NewAlliances
Ability to Pursue Alternatives to the Merger. Lawsuits
Have Been Filed against NewAlliance Challenging the Merger, and an Adverse Judgment
in Such Lawsuits or any Future Similar Lawsuits May Prevent the Merger from Becoming
Effective or from Becoming Effective within the Expected Timeframe. NewAlliance,
the members of the NewAlliance board of directors, certain NewAlliance officers,
First Niagara and Merger Sub are named as defendants in a number of purported class
action lawsuits brought by various NewAlliance stockholders, both in the Superior
Court of New Haven County in Connecticut and in the Court of Chancery in the State
of Delaware, challenging the proposed merger and seeking, among other things, to
enjoin the defendants from completing the merger on the agreed-upon terms and rescission
of the merger to the extent it has been completed. One of the
conditions to the closing of the merger is that no judgment, decree, injunction
or other order (whether temporary or permanent) that prohibits the completion of
the merger be in effect. As such, if any plaintiff were successful in obtaining
an injunction prohibiting the NewAlliance or First Niagara defendants from completing
the merger on the agreed upon terms, then such injunction may prevent the merger
from becoming effective or from becoming effective within the expected timeframe. Following
Completion of the Merger, First Niagara Will Face Risks Different from Those Faced
by First Niagara Today, which May Affect the Market Price of the Shares of First
Niagara Common Stock. 58 (1) Merger Agreement.
Incorporated herein by reference is Exhibit 2.1 filed with the Companys Current
Report on Form 8-K, filed August 20, 2010. Amended and
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of NewAlliance Bancshares, Inc. Incorporated
herein by reference is Exhibit 3.1 filed with the Companys Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q, filed August 13, 2004. Amended and
Restated Bylaws of NewAlliance Bancshares, Inc. Incorporated herein by reference
is Exhibit 3.2 filed with the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K, filed November
2, 2007. See Exhibit
3.1, Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation and Exhibit 3.2, Bylaws of
NewAlliance Bancshares, Inc. Intentionally
omitted. Amended and
Restated NewAlliance Bank Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan. Incorporated herein
by reference is Exhibit 10.2 filed with the Companys Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q, filed November 7, 2008. NewAlliance
Amended and Restated Employee Stock Ownership Plan Supplemental Executive Retirement
Plan. Incorporated herein by reference is Exhibit 10.3 filed with the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed November 7, 2008. The NewAlliance
Bank Amended and Restated 401(k) Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan. Incorporated
herein by reference is Exhibit 10.4 filed with the Companys Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q, filed November 7, 2008. 59 NewAlliance
Bank Executive Incentive Plan approved by shareholders on April 17, 2008, as amended.
Incorporated herein by reference is Exhibit 10.5 filed with the Companys Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q, filed August 7, 2009. Employee Change
of Control Severance Plan. Incorporated by reference is Exhibit 10.6 filed with
the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed November 8, 2007. Amended and
Restated Employment Agreement among NewAlliance Bancshares, Inc., NewAlliance Bank
and Peyton R. Patterson, effective December 15, 2009. Incorporated herein by reference
is Exhibit 10.7.1 filed with the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed
February 26, 2010. Intentionally
omitted. Amended and
Restated Employment Agreement among NewAlliance Bancshares, Inc., NewAlliance Bank
and Gail E.D. Brathwaite, effective December 15, 2009. Incorporated herein by reference
is Exhibit 10.7.1 filed with the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed
February 26, 2010. Intentionally
omitted. Intentionally
omitted. Intentionally
omitted. Intentionally
omitted. Amended and
Restated Employment Agreement between NewAlliance Bank and Donald T. Chaffee, effective
December 15, 2009. Incorporated herein by reference is Exhibit 10.7.8 filed with
the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 26, 2010. Amended and
Restated Employment Agreement between NewAlliance Bank and Paul A. McCraven, effective
December 15, 2009. Incorporated herein by reference is Exhibit 10.7.9 filed with
the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 26, 2010. Amended and
Restated Employment Agreement between NewAlliance Bank and Koon-Ping Chan, effective
December 15, 2009. Incorporated herein by reference is Exhibit 10.7.10 filed with
the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 26, 2010. Amended and
Restated Employment Agreement between NewAlliance Bank and Mark Gibson, effective
December 15, 2009. Incorporated herein by reference is Exhibit 10.7.11 filed with
the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 26, 2010. Amended and
Restated Employment Agreement among NewAlliance Bank, NewAlliance Bancshares, Inc.
and Cecil Eugene Kirby, Jr., effective December 15, 2009. Incorporated herein by
reference is Exhibit 10.7.12 filed with the Companys Annual Report on Form
10-K, filed February 26, 2010. Employment
Agreement among NewAlliance Bank, NewAlliance Bancshares, Inc. and Glenn I. MacInnes,
dated as of October 12, 2009. Incorporated herein by reference is Exhibit 10.7.13
filed with the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K, filed October 14, 2009. Form of Stock
Option Agreement for conversion awards (for outside directors). Incorporated herein
by reference is Exhibit 10.8.1 filed with the Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q, filed August 9, 2005. Form of Stock
Option Agreement for conversion awards (for employees, including senior officers).
Incorporated herein by reference is Exhibit 10.8.2 filed with the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed August 9, 2009. Form of Restricted
Stock Award Agreement for conversion awards (for outside directors). Incorporated
herein by reference is Exhibit 10.9.1 filed with the Companys Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q, filed August 9, 2005. Form of Restricted
Stock Award Agreement for conversion awards (for employees, including senior officers).
Incorporated herein by reference is Exhibit 10.9.2 filed with the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed August 9, 2005. NewAlliance
Bancshares, Inc. 2005 Long-Term Compensation Plan. Incorporated herein by reference
is Exhibit 4.3 filed with the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-8,
filed November 4, 2005. (Intentionally
omitted) Form of Indemnification
Agreement for Directors and Certain Executive Officers. Incorporated herein by reference
is Exhibit 10.12 filed with the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed
March 1, 2007. General Severance
Plan. Incorporated herein by reference is Exhibit 10.13 filed with the Companys
Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 27, 2009. Form of Performance
Share Award Agreement (for senior officers). Incorporated herein by reference is
Exhibit 10.14 filed with the Company Current Report on Form 8-K, filed June 1, 2009. Form of Restricted
Stock Award Agreement (for senior officers). Incorporated herein by reference is
Exhibit 10.15 filed with the Company Current Report on Form 8-K, filed June 1, 2009. Form of Stock
Option Award Agreement (for senior officers). Incorporated herein by reference is
Exhibit 10.16 filed with the Company Current Report on Form 8-K, filed June 1, 2009. Form of Stock
Option Agreement for annual awards (for outside directors). Incorporated herein
by reference is Exhibit 10.17 filed with the Companys Annual Report on Form
10-K, filed February 26, 2010. Form of Restricted
Stock Agreement for annual awards (for outside directors). Incorporated herein by
reference is Exhibit 10.18 filed with the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K,
filed February 26, 2010. 60 Code of Ethics
for Senior Financial Officers. Incorporated herein by reference is Exhibit 14 filed
with the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-KT, filed March 30, 2004. Subsidiaries
of NewAlliance Bancshares, Inc. and NewAlliance Bank. Incorporated herein by reference
is Exhibit 21 filed with the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March
1, 2007. Consent of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. Incorporated herein by reference is Exhibit 23.1 filed
with the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 26, 2010. Certification
of Peyton R. Patterson pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (filed herewith). Certification
of Glenn I. MacInnes pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (filed herewith). Certification
of Peyton R. Patterson pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith). Certification
of Glenn I. MacInnes pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith). The following
financial information from NewAlliance Bancshares, Inc.s quarterly report
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, formatted in XBRL: (i) the
Consolidated Statement of Income, (ii) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iii) the
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders Equity, (iv) the Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows, and (v) the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements tagged as blocks of text (furnished herewith). 61 62
The loan
portfolio segments that we consider to be higher risk are construction loans to
commercial developers for residential development and a small segment of our residential
real estate loans. The Company has a carrying value of $22.6 million of commercial
construction loans for residential development. All of these loans are collateralized
and carry a reserve allocation of $2.0 million. This segment has total delinquencies
of $2.9 million, all of which are in the over 90 day category.
Loans are placed on nonaccrual if
collection of principal or interest in full is in doubt, if the loan has been restructured,
or if any payment of principal or interest is past due 90 days or more. A loan may
be returned to accrual status if it has demonstrated sustained contractual performance
or if all principal and interest amounts contractually due are reasonably assured
of repayment within a reasonable period.
September 30,
December 31,
(Dollars in
thousands)
2010
2009
Nonperforming
loans (1)
$
49,133
$
31,140
8,053
6,136
2,898
2,459
60,084
39,735
5,667
8,497
2,517
2,187
25
88
2,542
2,275
68,293
50,507
Other real
estate owned
3,103
3,705
$
71,396
$
54,212
1.35
%
1.06
%
0.81
0.64
$
8,666
$
3,294
(1)
(2)
Deteriorating market conditions have adversely impacted the loan
portfolios since the latter part of 2007. As displayed in Table 10 below, the Company
recorded net charge-offs of $4.4 million during the three months ended September
30, 2010, compared to net charge-offs of $5.2 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2009. Net charge-offs of $1.3 million, $1.3 million and $1.4 million
were recorded against the residential, commercial real estate and commercial business
portfolios, respectively. The majority of the charge-offs in the residential category
were adjustments based on current appraisals which continue to show the depression
in home values while persistent adverse economic and housing pressures are affecting
charge-off levels in the commercial real estate and commercial business portfolios.
To support net charge-offs, reserve requirements for impaired loan classifications
and losses inherent in the portfolio, a provision for loan losses of $4.0 million
was recorded for the three months ended September 30, 2010 compared to $5.2 million
for the three months ended September 30, 2009. For the nine months ended September
30, 2010, net charge-offs were $12.2 million compared to $12.7 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 and were primarily in the residential and commercial
portfolios.
At or For the Three Months
At or For the Nine Months
Ended September 30,
Ended September 30,
(Dollars in
thousands)
2010
2009
2010
2009
Balance at
beginning of period
$
54,945
$
51,502
$
52,463
$
49,911
Provision
for loan losses
4,000
5,433
14,300
14,533
Charge-offs
1,265
960
3,610
2,449
1,301
392
3,295
2,389
-
1,010
953
3,055
1,678
3,166
4,084
5,317
388
490
921
903
4,632
6,018
12,863
14,113
Recoveries
4
3
15
140
-
538
-
538
-
-
-
-
235
228
556
519
30
34
111
192
269
803
682
1,389
Net charge-offs
4,363
5,215
12,181
12,724
Balance at
end of period
$
54,582
$
51,720
$
54,582
$
51,720
Net charge-offs
to average loans (annualized)
0.35
%
0.43
%
0.33
%
0.34
%
Allowance
for loan losses to total loans
1.08
1.08
1.08
1.08
Allowance
for loan losses to nonperforming loans
79.92
105.36
79.92
105.36
Net charge-offs
to allowance for loan losses
7.99
10.08
22.32
24.60
Total recoveries
to total charge-offs
5.81
13.34
5.30
9.84
The Company currently sells the majority of its originated fixed rate
residential real estate loans with terms of 15 years or more. Loans held for sale
were $27.2 million at September 30, 2010, an increase of $12.5 million from $14.7
million at December 31, 2009. The increase is primarily due to a drop in market
interest rates during the third quarter. Year-to-date, the Company originated $218.0
million mortgage loans for sale with approximately half being originated in the
current quarter. The Company originates both fixed-rate mortgage loans and small
business loans (SBA) for sale in the secondary market.
At September 30,
2010, the Company had intangible assets of $556.7 million, a decrease of $5.8 million,
from $562.5 million at December 31, 2009. The decrease is due to year-to-date amortization
expense for core deposit and customer relationships.
Sources of Funds
Deposits
Table 11: Deposits
September 30,
December 31,
(In thousands)
2010
2009
Savings
$
1,705,787
$
1,817,787
Money market
993,570
790,453
NOW
398,435
400,176
Demand
581,293
534,180
Time
1,459,775
1,481,446
$
5,138,860
$
5,024,042
Borrowings
The following
table summarizes the Companys recorded borrowings at September 30, 2010.
Table 12:
Borrowings
September 30,
December 31,
(In thousands)
2010
2009
FHLB advances (1)
$
1,994,811
$
1,755,533
Repurchase
agreements
105,606
112,095
Mortgage loans
payable
1,044
1,165
Junior subordinated
debentures issued to affiliated trusts (2)
21,135
21,135
$
2,122,596
$
1,889,928
(1)
Includes fair
value adjustments on acquired borrowings, in accordance with purchase accounting
standards of $2.1 million and $3.1 million at September 30, 2010 and December 31,
2009, respectively. The acquisition fair value adjustments (premiums) are being
amortized as an adjustment to interest expense on borrowings over their remaining
terms using the level yield method.
(2)
The trusts
were organized to facilitate the issuance of trust preferred securities. The Company
acquired these subsidiaries when it acquired Alliance Bancorp of New England, Inc.
and Westbank Corporation, Inc. The affiliated trusts are wholly-owned subsidiaries
of the Company and the payments of these securities are irrevocably and unconditionally
guaranteed by the Company.
Stockholders Equity
Management
Of Market And Interest Rate Risk
General
Gap Analysis
Income Simulation Analysis
Percentage change in
estimated net interest income
over twelve months
100 basis
point upward shock in interest rates
4.33
%
25 basis point
downward shock in interest rates
-1.21
%
Liquidity and Capital Position
Item 1A. Risk Factors
The merger agreement is subject to a number of conditions
which must be fulfilled in order to complete the merger. Those conditions include:
approval of the merger agreement by NewAlliance stockholders, approval of the issuance
of First Niagara common stock in connection with the merger by First Niagara stockholders,
regulatory approvals, absence of orders prohibiting the completion of the merger,
effectiveness of the registration statement of which this joint proxy statement/prospectus
is a part, approval of the shares of First Niagara common stock to be issued to
NewAlliance stockholders for listing on the NASDAQ Global Select Market, the continued
accuracy of the representations and warranties by both parties and the performance
by both parties of their covenants and agreements, and the receipt by both parties
of legal opinions from their respective tax counsels.
If the merger
agreement is terminated, there may be various consequences, including:
Uncertainty about the effect of the merger on employees
and customers may have an adverse effect on NewAlliance and consequently on First
Niagara. These uncertainties may impair NewAlliances ability to attract, retain
and motivate key personnel until the merger is completed, and could cause customers
and others that deal with NewAlliance to seek to change existing business relationships
with NewAlliance. Retention of certain employees may be challenging during the pendency
of the merger, as certain employees may experience uncertainty about their future
roles. If key employees depart because of issues relating to the uncertainty and
difficulty of integration or a desire not to remain with the business, First Niagaras business following the merger could be negatively impacted. In addition,
the merger agreement restricts NewAlliance from making certain acquisitions and
taking other specified actions until the merger occurs without the consent of First
Niagara. These restrictions may prevent NewAlliance from pursuing attractive business
opportunities that may arise prior to the completion of the merger.
The merger agreement contains no-shop provisions that, subject
to limited exceptions, limit NewAlliances ability to initiate, solicit, encourage
or knowingly facilitate any inquiries or competing third-party proposals, or engage
in any negotiations, or provide any confidential information, or have any discussions
with any person relating to a proposal to acquire all or a significant part of NewAlliance.
In addition, NewAlliance has agreed to pay First Niagara a termination fee in the
amount of $60 million in the event that First Niagara terminates the merger agreement
for certain reasons. These provisions might discourage a potential competing acquirer
that might have an interest in acquiring all or a significant part of NewAlliance
from considering or proposing that acquisition even if it were prepared to pay consideration
with a higher per share market price than that proposed in the merger, or might
result in a potential competing acquirers proposing to pay a lower per share
price to acquire NewAlliance than it might otherwise have proposed to pay. Until
the merger agreement is adopted by NewAlliance stockholders, NewAlliance can consider
and participate in discussions and negotiations with respect to an alternative unsolicited
bona fide acquisition proposal (subject to its obligation to pay a termination fee
under certain circumstances) so long as the NewAlliance board of directors determines
in good faith (after consultation with legal counsel) that failure to do so would
result in a violation of its fiduciary duties to NewAlliance stockholders under
Delaware law and that such alternative acquisition proposal constitutes a superior
proposal or would reasonably be likely to result in a superior proposal. NewAlliance
shall also keep First Niagara appraised of developments, discussions and negotiations
relating to any such acquisition proposal.
Upon completion of the merger, NewAlliance will
become a direct wholly owned subsidiary of First Niagara, and certain holders of
NewAlliance common stock will become holders of First Niagara common stock. Some
of First Niagaras current businesses and markets differ from those of NewAlliance
and, accordingly, the results of operations of First Niagara after the merger may
be affected by factors different from those currently affecting the results of operations
of NewAlliance.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
(a) None.
(b) Not applicable.
(c) The following
table sets forth information about the Companys stock repurchases for the
three months ended September 30, 2010.
(a) Total
Number
of Shares
Purchased(b) Average
Price Paid per
Share (includes
commission)(c) Total
Number of Shares
Purchased as Part of
Publicly Announced Plans
or Programs(d) Maximum
Number (or
Approximate Dollar Value) of
Shares that may Yet Be
Purchased Under the
Plans or
Programs
Period
July 1-31,
2010
0
$
-
0
1,421,938
August 1-31,
2010
(1)
2,065
$
12.18
0
1,421,938
September 1-30, 2010
0
$
-
0
1,421,938
Total
2,065
0
1,421,938
Represents
shares of common stock withheld by the Company to satisfy tax withholding requirements
on the vesting of shares under the Companys benefit plans.
Exhibit
Number
2.1
3.1
3.2
4.1
10.1
10.2
10.3
10.4
10.5
10.6
10.7.1
10.7.2
10.7.3
10.7.4
10.7.5
10.7.6
10.7.7
10.7.8
10.7.9
10.7.10
10.7.11
10.7.12
10.7.13
10.8.1
10.8.2
10.9.1
10.9.2
10.10
10.11
10.12
10.13
10.14
10.15
10.16
10.17
10.18
14
21
23.1
31.1
31.2
32.1
32.2
101
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant
has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
NewAlliance
Bancshares, Inc.
By:
/s/ Glenn
I. MacInnes
Glenn I. MacInnes
Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Date:
November 4,
2010